alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3096 

To designate the building occupied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation 

located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, as the ‘‘Michael D. Resnick 

Terrorist Screening Center’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 

Mr. CONNOLLY (for himself, Mr. HANNA, Mr. WOLF, and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the building occupied by the Federal Bureau 

of Investigation located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, as the ‘‘Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening 

Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The building occupied by the Federal Bureau of In5 vestigation located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Michael D. Resnick 

7 Terrorist Screening Center’’ during the period in which 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3096 IH

1 the building is occupied by the Federal Bureau of Inves2 tigation. 

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

4 During the period in which the building referred to 

5 in section 1 is occupied by the Federal Bureau of Inves6 tigation, any reference in a law, map, regulation, docu7 ment, paper, or other record of the United States to that 

8 building shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Michael 

9 D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 99

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying annual report of The Lionshare Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, George E. Weast, principal executive officer and principal accounting officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By:  /s/George E. Weast
     ------------------
     George E. Weast

     October 25, 2002




<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7715
TIMOTHY LLOYD, a/k/a Luxurious X, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus BARTON VINCENT, Deputy General Counsel; JUDY C. ANDERSON, Director of Program Services; RICHARD E. SMITH, Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution; JOSEPH COUNTS, Associate Warden; HERB JOHNS, Institution Grievance Coordinator; DEBBIE N. MANESS, Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-03-1546-4) Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 16, 2005 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. William Benson Darwin, Jr., HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, PA, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Timothy Lloyd appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lloyd v. Vincent , No. CA-03-1546-4 (D.S.C. Sept. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tektronix, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Colin L. Slade, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:      October 14, 2003



/s/  COLIN L. SLADE
--------------------
Colin L. Slade
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0242%205(e)/p120242.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:05:20 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0242

Focus Ready Draft 4/9/2012

ENGINEER: Avcin \ JD \ JAS

 
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0242%205(e)/p120242.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:05:20 PM]

 

 

SAT (concerns) (03/30/2012):

Migration to groundwater: PMN negl; Incin Pdt rapid

PBT rating: P3B2T2 PMN: P3B1T1, Health 1-2, Eco 1 //

Incin Pdt: P3B2T2, Health 2, Eco, 3

Health: 2 Drinking Water, Inhalation, Inhalation for per-F

acid

Eco: 3 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0242%205(e)/p120242.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:05:20 PM]

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0242
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0242%205(e)/p120242.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:05:20 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0242
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0242%205(e)/p120242.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:05:20 PM]
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0242%205(e)/p120242.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:05:20 PM]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50064

Summary Calendar

 

FREDA SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-02-CV-458 

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Freda Smith seeks reversal of the district court’s decision

to affirm the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to

deny Smith Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. The ALJ

found that Smith was not disabled, could perform a limited range

of sedentary work, and that there are a significant number of

such jobs in the national economy. Smith argues that the ALJ did

not properly evaluate her symptoms, pain, credibility, or

residual functional capacity. She asserts that the ALJ merely
No. 04-50064

-2-

stated that he considered all of the evidence in reaching his

conclusion, rather than analyzing the evidence. Smith asserts

that the ALJ should have recognized that she has an impairment

due to severe depression, that she is required to lie down

frequently, and that she cannot sustain employment on a regular

basis.

Our review is limited to determining whether the ALJ applied

the correct legal standards and whether the decision is supported

by substantial evidence. Falco v. Shalala, 27 F.3d 160, 162 (5th

Cir. 1994). We find that the ALJ adequately considered Smith’s

symptoms and professed limitations and properly analyzed his

findings in light of her contentions and the medical evidence. 

See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1529; Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 237-

40 (5th Cir. 1994). The record provides substantial evidence

supporting the conclusion that Smith is not disabled within the

meaning of the Social Security Act. 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard H. Wills, certify that:

        (1)     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tektronix,
Inc., for the fiscal quarter ending February 26, 2005;

        (2)     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

        (3)     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

        (4)     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

                (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

                (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

        (5)     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                (a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

                (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:   April 6, 2005


/s/ RICHARD H. WILLS
-------------------------------------
Richard H. Wills
President and Chief Executive Officer
From: "Cain, Randy D." <RCAIN2@alleghenyenergy.com> To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Cannon, William E." <WCA NNON@alleghenyenergy.com>, "Lapcevic, Joseph P." <JLAPCEV@alleghenyene rgy.com> Date: 07/06/2010 11:39 AM Subject: Steam Electric Power Generating ICR - Pleasants Power Station (08281) - Extension Request

July 6, 2010

Jezebele Alicea USEPA 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code: 4303TWashington, DC 20460 RE: Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines Allegheny Energy Pleasants Power Station – Plant ID 08281

Dear Ms. Alicea: Allegheny Energy’s Pleasants Power Station received the EPA Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines on Friday, June 18, 2010. We have reviewed the ICR questionnaire (Version 2) and believe its breadth and depth of information require more time to complete. In accord with the instructions on the EPA cover lett er, Allegheny Energy respectfully requests an additional 30 days to provide responses. There are two reasons for this time extension request. First, Allegheny Energy initiated a merger with FirstEnergy of Akron, Ohio, on February 11, 2010. In order to support the merger and thoroughly explore the resulting synergies of the combined company numerous employees of Allegheny Energy were sent to Akron at the end of May for approximately a three month period. This has decreased an already lean staff to continue conducting business as usual in addition to responding to such inquiries as this ICR. Compounding the problem is potential attrition of Allegheny En ergy Corporate Services staff in anticipation of job loss associated with the combination of the two companies. Already, one key engineer that would have extensively worked on the ICR as left the company. In addition, the unprecedented issuance of a number of new regulatory proposals (e.g. CCRs, GHG MRR, GHG Ta iloring Rule), al ong with other ICRs (i.e. HAPs MACT and PCB) by EPA and state regulatory agencies has also added to the difficulty to provide thorough and meaningful responses by our limited staff. An additional 30 days would allow for Allegheny Energy and power station staffs to not only gather the necessary data required to support the ICR, but also would provide time to review the submittal for completeness and consistency. This additional 30 days in the response time will most likely lessen the needfor further inquiry by EPA’s contractor (ERG) for purpose of explanation of the responses provided and possibly supplemental information request to aide clarification. Thank you for considering this request. Sincerely, Randy Cain

Randy Cain Environmental Affairs Manager Allegheny Energy 800 Cabin Hill Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 phone: 724-838-6004 fax: 724-830-7711 e-mail: rcain2@alleghenyenergy.com
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3040 

To provide for the minimum size of crews of freight trains, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2013 

Mr. MICHAUD (for himself and Ms. PINGREE of Maine) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide for the minimum size of crews of freight trains, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Freight Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FREIGHT TRAIN CREW SIZE. 

6 (a) AMENDMENT.—Subchapter II of chapter 201 of 

7 title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following new section: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3040 IH

1 ‘‘§ 20168. Freight train crew size 

2 ‘‘Effective 30 days after the date of enactment of the 

3 Safe Freight Act, no freight train or light engine used in 

4 connection with the movement of freight may be operated 

5 unless it has a crew consisting of at least 2 individuals, 

6 one of whom is certified under regulations promulgated 

7 by the Federal Railroad Administration as a locomotive 

8 engineer pursuant to section 20135, and the other of 

9 whom is certified under regulations promulgated by the 

10 Federal Railroad Administration as a conductor pursuant 

11 to section 20163.’’. 

12 (b) TABLE OF SECTIONS AMENDMENT.—The table of 

13 sections for chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, 

14 is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘20168. Freight train crew size.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Azhar M. Chaudhary v. Victoria A. Mora and Kristie R. Salter

Appellate case number: 01-21-00352-CV

Trial court case number: 18-DCV-254442

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

The motion for rehearing is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Peter Kelly

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Goodman, and Guerra.

Date: December 13, 2022
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________

THE PAW WASH, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. PAW PLUNGER, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant,

__________________________
2012-1240

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missour i in case no. 08-CV-0113, Judge Gary A. Fenner.

__________________________ Decided: December 14, 2012

__________________________
R ICHARD L. B ROPHY , Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, of St Louis, Missouri, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was J ENNIFER E. H OEKEL

.

D AVID L. R EIN , J R ., Finch & Campbell, LLP, of Kansas City, Missouri, argued for defendant-appellant.

__________________________ Before D YK , P LAGER , and C LEVENGER , Circuit Judges

.PAW WASH v. PAW PLUNGER 2

P ER C URIAM

. In this case, based on a certain settlement agreement between the parties, the district court, on November 15, 2011, issued a permanent injunction enjoining Paw Plunger, LLC (“Paw Plunger”) “from infringing the ‘391 patent by making, using, offe ring for sale, and/or selling in the United States of importing into the United States the ‘Paw Plunger’ and any other products that infringe one (1) or more claims of the ‘391 patent.” Paw Plunger appeals. We affirm the decision of the district court with one exception. The injunction granted by the district court should have been limited to Claim 17 of the ‘391 patent. Thus, the permanent injunction must be revised to read as follows:
ORDERED Defendant and each of its agents affiliates, successors, servants, and employees, and any and all other persons or entities acting under Defendant’s authority, are hereby permanentlyenjoined from infringing the ‘391 patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States or importing into the United Statesthe “Paw Plunger” and any other products that infringe Claim 17 of the ‘391 patent. In light of this decision, we vacate the district court’s ruling and remand to the dist rict court so that it may enter an appropriate order. AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART

C OSTS Costs to appellee.
Exhibit 32(i)  CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In
connect with the quarterly report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 to be filed with Securities and
Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas P.
Taylor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that: (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods covered by the Report. It is
not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Date: January 4,
      2009
    By:
    /s/ Douglas P.
      TaylorDouglas P. Taylor,Chief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Stone Container Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick J. Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|/s/PATRICK J. MOOREPatrick J. Moore
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 6, 2004 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in
typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Stone Container Corporation and will be retained by Stone Container Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
10QSB REPORT FOR THE QUARTER AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10QSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000095898
<NAME> SWISS CHALET , INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,964,121
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  319,139
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,235
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,381,718
<PP&E>                                       6,568,596
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,105,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,970,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          709,378
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       700,581
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,438,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,970,040
<SALES>                                      2,720,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,047,177
<CGS>                                           52,999
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,936,797
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,057,381
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,057,381
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,057,381
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.75


</TABLE>