alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
				
<ARTICLE> 5				
       				
<S>                      	<C>			
<PERIOD-TYPE>             	9-MOS 	
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        		DEC-31-1997		
<PERIOD-END>		               SEP-30-1997 	
<CASH>		                          55,579		
<SECURITIES>		                       		0		
<RECEIVABLES>		               	  374,480		
<ALLOWANCES>			                    7,253		
<INVENTORY>			                   290,343		
<CURRENT-ASSETS>		               731,428		
<PP&E>				                       131,506		
<DEPRECIATION>			                 72,963		
<TOTAL-ASSETS>		              	1,607,747		
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>	        	  345,790		
<BONDS>		                           			0		
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               			0		
<PREFERRED>		                        		0		
<COMMON>			                       95,076		
<OTHER-SE>	                  		1,166,881		
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  	1,607,747		
<SALES>		                    		1,609,146		
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	             	1,617,615		
<CGS>		                      		1,203,199		
<TOTAL-COSTS>	               		1,203,199
<OTHER-EXPENSES>	                    		0		
<LOSS-PROVISION>	                    		0		
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		                 965		
<INCOME-PRETAX>		 	             (255,911)		
<INCOME-TAX>		                       		0		
<INCOME-CONTINUING>	                 		0		
<DISCONTINUED>		                     		0		
<EXTRAORDINARY>		                    		0		
<CHANGES>	                          			0 		
<NET-INCOME>		                	 (255,911)		
<EPS-PRIMARY>			                   (0.03)		
<EPS-DILUTED>		   	                (0.03)	 	
        				

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of National Equipment Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, F. Duffield Meyercord, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|Date: March 30, 2004 | /s/F. DUFFIELD MEYERCORDF. Duffield Meyercord Interim
Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO CESAR MORENO-HEREDIA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-72427

Agency No. A079-543-611

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2011**

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Julio Cesar Moreno-Heredia, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his third

motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen.

FILED

MAR 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-72427

He v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1128, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2007). We deny the petition for

review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Moreno-Heredia’s third

motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred where the motion was filed

nearly five years after the BIA’s final administrative order, see 8 C.F.R. §

1003.2(c)(2), and Moreno Heredia failed to establish changed circumstances in

Peru to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time and numerical bar for filing

motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); see also Malty v. Ashcroft, 381

F.3d 942, 945 (9th Cir. 2004) (“The critical question is . . . whether circumstances

have changed sufficiently that a petitioner who previously did not have a legitimate

claim for asylum now has a well-founded fear of future persecution.”). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000095779
<NAME> SWANK, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              17
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,143
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,429
<INVENTORY>                                     44,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,237
<PP&E>                                          28,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,128
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,690
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,537
<SALES>                                        110,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,862
<CGS>                                           68,992
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (11)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (281)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (130)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 42
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        42
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
#### McINTURFF v. STATE.

No. 25933.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 8, 1952.

Reynolds & Hardin, Shamrock, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the theft of a week-old calf, and the jury assessed his punishment at 2 years in the penitentiary.

The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is not questioned.

In his brief, appellant urges that his conviction should be reversed because the state failed to establish venue, and because the district attorney “established or inferred” by his cross-examination of appellant that he had stolen hogs as well as the calf in question.

The venue question was not made an issue in the trial court, and under the statute, Art. 847, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., this Court must presume that venue was established.

We are unable to appraise the complaint concerning the questions directed to appellant on cross-examination in the absence of a bill of exception. However, we observe nothing improper in the cross-examination.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2854 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 

deduction of State and local general sales taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2013 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington (for himself, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. COOPER, Mr. CONAWAY, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. DUNCAN

of Tennessee, Mr. FINCHER, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. HALL, Mr. HECK of 

Washington, Mr. HECK of Nevada, Mr. HINOJOSA, Ms. HERRERA

BEUTLER, Mr. KILMER, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. NUGENT, 

Mr. RADEL, and Mr. ROE of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the deduction of State and local general sales 

taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2854 IH

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION OF 

2 STATE AND LOCAL GENERAL SALES TAXES. 

3 Subparagraph (I) of section 164(b)(5) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘, and be5 fore January 1, 2014’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27280]



[[Page 63581]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-289-002]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 18, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 13, 2000, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, Sub Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 26, 
and Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 1, to with an effective date August 1, 
2000.
    Tennessee states that the attached tariff sheets are submitted in 
compliance with the Commission's Order issued September 28, 2000, in 
Docket No. RP00-289-001 (September 28th Order). Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company, et al., 92 FERC 61,275 (2000). In the September 28th Order, 
the Commission directed Tennessee, within 15 days of issuance of the 
order, to (1) file Sub Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 26 with the deleted 
footnote No. 3 from Rate Schedule NET, (2) file Eleventh Revised Sheet 
No. 1 showing the correct page number for Rate Schedule NET 284 on the 
Table of Contents.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27280 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
September 4, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOCKQUAIL PIERRE MCC ALL , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00671

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the
ap peal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.
We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
| | Exhibit 99.1
| | ------------





|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Swank, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report"), the undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated:  November 13, 2002 | /s/ John Tulin                
|------------------------- | ------------------------------
|                          |                               
|                          | John A. Tulin, President      
|                          | (Chief Executive Officer)     
|                          |                               
|                          |                               
|Dated:  November 13, 2002 | /s/ Jerold R. Kassner         
|                          |                               
|                          | Jerold R. Kassner, Senior Vice
|                          | President and Treasurer       
|                          | (Chief Financial Officer)
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I,John B. Simmons, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresas of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report; and

 

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors:

 

a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|   | Date:   December 5, 2003 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |                                         |
|   |                                         |
|   | /s/ John B. Simmons                          |
|   | John B. Simmons                              |
|   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   |
|   | (Principal Financial Officer)                |

 

----
11/19/2021

5:20-cv-571-OLG

R&R (DOC #74)

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 75 Filed 11/19/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-50838

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DANA HUDGINS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:11-CR-156-2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Dana Hudgins has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Hudgins has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 16, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-50838 Document: 00512021418 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/16/2012
No. 11-50838

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-50838 Document: 00512021418 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/16/2012
FAA - 2011 - 0908
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-3983]

Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Public Law 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment assistance, hereinafter called NAFTA-TAA and in accordance with section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC 2331), an investigation was initiated on June 22, 2000, in response to a petition filed on the same date by a company official, on behalf of workers at Four Seasons of Georgetown, Georgetown, South Carolina.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of October, 2000.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-26728  Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RIDGE PETROLEUM, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

ENERGY OPS, LLC,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00078

- CV

Appeal from the

109th District Court

of Winkler County, Texas

(TC# DC18

- 17380)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment o f the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and it’s sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5, on the judgment and all

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2020.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MEREDITH DESHAWN PENN,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 772 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-0269

_____________________________

LETREL SMALL,

Appellant,

v.

C & S WHOLESALE/CCMSI,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Robert A. Arthur, Judge.

Date of Accident: March 1, 2018. 

May 31, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

_____________________________

Letrel Small, pro se, Appellant.

Jennifer T. Reimsnyder and Laura A. Buck of McConnaughhay, 

Coonrod, Pope, Weaver & Stern, P.A., Ocala, for Appellees.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BUYWADE A. BABORAM
, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM

, o/b/o GABRIELLA D.M. JOSEPH
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1375

[October 17, 2018 ]

Administrative appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Program, DOAH Case No. 18

- 001105

- CS and CSP Case No. 1279877235.

Buywade Baboram, Mirimar, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Toni C. Bernstein,

S enior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee Department

of Revenue.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1980).

W ARNER

, M AY and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Dennis OBrien, director and Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer of Superior Silver Mines, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 4, 2010

By    /s/ Dennis OBrien



Dennis OBrien, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer