alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Meeting of the ACRS 
Subcommittee on Materials and Metallurgy


Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Materials and Metallurgy will hold a 
meeting on November 16, 2000, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Thursday, November 16, 2000-8:30 a.m. until 12 Noon

    The Subcommittee will discuss the proposed draft regulatory guide 
DG-1053, ``Calculational and Dosimetry Methods for Determining Pressure 
Vessel Neutron Fluence.'' The purpose of this meeting is to gather 
information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and to formulate 
proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the 
full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff engineer named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    During the initial portion of the meeting, the Subcommittee, along 
with any of its consultants who may be present, may exchange 
preliminary views regarding matters to be considered during the balance 
of the meeting.
    The Subcommittee will then hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of the NRC staff and other interested 
persons regarding this review.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the 
meeting has been canceled or rescheduled, and the Chairman's ruling on 
requests for the opportunity to present oral statements and the time 
allotted therefor, can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS 
staff engineer, Mr. Noel F. Dudley (telephone 301/415-6888) between 
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting 
are urged to contact the above named individual one or two working days 
prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the 
agenda, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: October 19, 2000.
James E. Lyons,
Associate Director for Technical Support, ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. 00-27444 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3081 

To amend the Missing Children’s Assistance Act to better enable law 

enforcement to identify, locate, and recover child victims of sex trafficking. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2013 

Mr. WALBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Missing Children’s Assistance Act to better 

enable law enforcement to identify, locate, and recover 

child victims of sex trafficking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE MISSING CHILDREN’S AS4 SISTANCE ACT. 

5 Section 404(b)(1) of the Missing Children’s Assist6 ance Act (42 U.S.C. 5773(b)(1)) is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (R) by striking at the end 

8 ‘‘and’’; 

9 (2) in subparagraph (S) by striking the period 

10 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 


EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3081 IH

1 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(T) provide technical assistance to law 

3 enforcement agencies and first responders in 

4 identifying, locating, and recovering victims of 

5 child sex trafficking.’’. 

Æ 


EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
CAUSE NO. 2013-74337

RSM PRODUCTION CORP., § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF and JACK GRYNBERG, § § Plaintiffs, § §
VS. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS § GLOBAL PETROLEUM GROUP, § LTD., TRICON GEOPHYSICS, INC., § SEABIRD EXPLORATION, § AMERICAS, INC., and BLACKWATER § SUBSEA, LLC, § § Defendants. § 189 TH DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

Plaintiffs, RSM Production Corp. and Jack Grynberg file this Notice of

Interlocutory Appeal, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1, and show the

Court as follows:

1. This appeal is from the 189th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas,

the Honorable William Burke presiding.

2. The style of the cause in the trial court is: RSM Production Corp., et al. v.

Global Petroleum Group, Ltd., et al. ; Cause Number 2013-74337.

3. Plaintiffs desire to appeal from the Court’s Order Sustaining Global

Petroleum Group, Ltd.’s Special Appearance in this matter, signed September 22, 2015.

4. This interlocutory appeal is taken pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and

Remedies Code § 51.014 (a)(7) and is an accelerated appeal. 10/9/2015 3:40:32 PM Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County

Envelope No. 7316780 By: Deandra Mosley
Filed: 10/9/2015 3:40:32 PM

ACCEPTED
01-15-00866-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS
10/15/2015 10:34:18 AM
CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK2 5

. This appeal is taken to either the First or Fourteenth Court of Appeals in

Houston, Texas.

Respectfully submitted,



### /s/ Randall C. Owens
Howard L. C lose

State Bar No. 04406500
Randall C. Owens

State Bar No. 15380700 Bradley W. Snead

State Bar No. 24049835

A ndrew C. Nelson

State Bar No. 24074801

W RIGHT 

### & C LOSE



### , LLP One Riverway, Suite 2200 Houston, Texas 77056 Telephone: (713) 572

- 4321
Facsimile: (713) 572

- 4320

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, RSM Production Corp. and Jack Grynberg3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVI CE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this document was served on the following attorneys by electronic service on this 9 th day of October 2015 :

Brian F. Antweil Katten Muchin Rosenman UK, LLP 1301 McKinney Street, Suite 3000 Houston, TX 77010

- 3033

Attorneys for Defendants, Global Petroleum Group, Ltd., Tricon Geophysics, Inc. and Blackwater Subsea, LLC

Chris Hanslik
Chris T. J ames Boyar Miller 4265 San Felipe, Suite 1200 Houston, Texas 77027

Attorneys for Defendant, SeaBird Exploration Americas, Inc.



### /s/ Randall C. Owens
Randall C. Owens
#### In re Estate of Chambers.

(No. 27795

Decided November 22, 1939.)

*Mr. Clifford B. Curtner,*for appellant, The Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company.

*Messrs. Cowden $*Cowden, for appellees, Margaret J. Schieble and others.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

’Weygandt, 0. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2927 

To prevent the implementation of certain tax and fee provisions of the 

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act until the Secretary of the 

Treasury certifies that reporting requirements relating to employer status 

and employee income levels and health care status may be made with 

100 percent accuracy and without fraud. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prevent the implementation of certain tax and fee provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

until the Secretary of the Treasury certifies that reporting requirements relating to employer status and employee income levels and health care status may be made 

with 100 percent accuracy and without fraud. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2927 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Taxation Without 

3 Verification Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CERTIFICATION THAT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 

5 RELATING TO EMPLOYER STATUS AND EM6 PLOYEE INCOME LEVELS AND HEALTH CARE 

7 STATUS MAY BE MADE WITH 100 PERCENT 

8 ACCURACY AND WITHOUT FRAUD. 

9 No tax or fee imposed by, and no reduction in a de10 duction, exclusion or other tax benefit made by, the Pa11 tient Protection and Affordable Care Act (including any 

12 amendments therein) shall be implemented for any period 

13 before the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary’s 

14 designee, certifies that the reporting requirements relating 

15 to employer status and employee income levels and health 

16 care status may be made with 100 percent accuracy and 

17 without fraud. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-3570

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Robert J. Lacher, *

* [Unpublished]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 7, 2005

Filed: April 13, 2005

___________

Before BYE, RILEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Robert Lacher challenges the sentence the district

court1

 imposed after he pleaded guilty to a felon-in-possession charge. He argues that

(1) Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), precluded the district court from

finding that his second-degree burglary conviction of a commercial building was a

crime of violence; and (2) the conviction is not a crime of violence, and this court
-2-

should revisit United States v. Hascall, 76 F.3d 902 (8th Cir.) (holding burglary of

commercial structure is crime of violence), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 948 (1996).

These arguments fail. During the pendency of this appeal, the Supreme Court

held in United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738, 756, 765-67 (2005), that the

reasoning in Blakely applies to the federal Sentencing Guidelines, and therefore that

“any fact (other than a prior conviction) which is necessary to support a sentence

exceeding the maximum authorized by the facts established by a plea of guilty . . .

must be admitted by the defendant or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Thus, the Court reaffirmed that, consistent with the Sixth Amendment, a court may

find the fact of a prior conviction, see id. at 756, and the fact of a prior conviction

includes the determination whether the conviction is of a type that enhances the

defendant’s sentence, see United States v. Kempis-Bonola, 287 F.3d 699, 703 (8th

Cir. 2002). We also find that the court properly determined that Lacher’s conviction

was a “crime of violence,” see Hascall, 76 F.3d at 904 (second-degree burglary of

commercial building “involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of

physical injury to another” and is therefore a crime of violence), and only this court

en banc may revisit its holding in Hascall, see United States v. Yell, 18 F.3d 581, 583

(8th Cir. 1994). Lacher raises no argument based on Booker that the sentence

imposed was unreasonable.

Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2623]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: February 15-17, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 AM to 6 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: One Washington Circle Hotel, Conference Center, One 
Washington Circle, Washington, DC 30037.
    Contact Person: Lawrence E. Chaitkin, PHD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Rm. 6138, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-6470.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist 
Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, 
Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: January 28, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-2623 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ N o. 02

- 20

- 00008

- CV

__ _________________________

On Ap p eal from the 16th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010

- 11156

- 16 Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ. Mem orandum Opinion by Justice Gabriel 

### C LARENCE 

### J EDUSS 

### W ASHINGTON 

### , Appellant
V


### . C ATHERINE 

### G RACE 

### R UBIO 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Clarence Jed uss Washington attempts to appe al the trial court ’ s

“ C ommitment O rder ” committing him to county jail for 180 days after a finding of contempt for his failure to make court

- order e d child support payments. On January 10, 2020 , w e sent Washington a letter ex pressing our concern that

we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the “ Commitment Order ” is not a final ju dgment or an appealable interlocutory order. See In re O f fice of Attorney Gen. of Tex

. , 215 S.W.3d 91 3, 915 (Tex. App.

— Fort Wo rth 2 007, orig. proceeding) ( “ D ecisions in contempt proceedings cannot be reviewed on appeal because contempt orders are not appealable, even when appealed along with a judgment that is

a ppealable. ” ) ; Cad

le Co. v. Lobin

gier , 50 S.W.3d 662, 671 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2001, pets. denied) ( en banc) (stating the same and explaining that a “ contempt judgment is reviewable only via a petition for writ of habea s corp us (if the contemnor is confine d )

or a petition for writ of mandam us (if no confinement is involved) ” ) ; Anders on v. Burleson , 583 S.W.2d 467, 467 (Tex. App.

— Hous ton [1st Dist.] 1979, no writ) ( “ T h ere is no provision in Texas statutes for an appeal from an a djudication and commitment for contempt . ” )

. We informed Washington t h at unless he filed a respo ns e sho w ing grounds for continui ng the appeal, we would dismiss it. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. Washington has n ot file d a response. Accordi ngly, we dismiss his appeal for want of jurisdiction

. See Tex. R. App. P. 4 3.2 ( f) ; In re O ffice of Attorney Gen. of T

ex . , 215 S.W.3d3

at 9 15 ; Cadle Co. , 50 S.W.3d at 671 ; Kristopher v. State , No

. 14

- 98

- 1042

- C R , 1998 WL 725812, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 8, 1998, no pet. ) (not de signated for publica tion) ( “ We ar e unable to consider these appeals becau s e orders o f contempt and commitment ar e unappealable, inte rlocutory orders. ” )

. /s/ L e e Gabriel Lee Gabriel Justice Delivered: F ebruary 13, 2020
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-51056 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS ORTEGA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-196-ALL

-------------------- Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos OrtegaHernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### JONES v. STATE.

No. 26764.

Court of 'Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 17, 1954.

Walter B. Conway, Houston, for appellant.

William H. Scott, Ewing Werlein, Dist. Attys., Houston, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant’s counsel on appeal ask leave to file motion to reinstate the appeal and also seek to have the mandate heretofore issued withdrawn.

It is alleged that said attorneys were employed to prosecute the appeal and arranged for the transcript to be forwarded to this court; that due to error of the clerk of the trial court in omitting the name of counsel on appeal from the transcript, they were not notified of the disposition of the appeal until the time for filing motion for rehearing had passed.

It is further alleged that appellant is now in the Harris'County jail. Whether he is held solely because of the mandate from this court, or to await the final disposition of the appeal does not appear, nor is it shown by affidavit that he is confined in jail.

Assuming that he is in jail awaiting the appeal, we have examined the record for the purpose of determining whether or not the mandate should be recalled.

Appellant was found in possession of 20 marijuana cigarettes.

The sole claim of error is predicated upon the contention that his arrest was illegal and the evidence as to the marijuana cigarettes was unlawfully obtained and therefore inadmissible.

The arresting officers were informed a" short time prior to the arrest “that a negro would meet another one in the 2600 block of Leeland at the railroad tracks; that he would come out the back door of a house four or five houses down the railroad track; would have on a tan hat, a blue checkered shirt and tan pants and that he *could*have the marijuana in his possession”, *“would*have marijuana in his possession.”

This information was received by Police Officer Sidney Smith about 6:20 in the afternoon and, according to the information, the described person would appear at 6:30 P.M.

The officers proceeded to the site mentioned and when appellant, dressed “in a tan hat, blue checkered sport shirt and tan pants” appeared he was searched and 20 marijuana cigarettes were found in his pocket.

*723The officers being informed that the' described person was in possession of marijuana, were authorized to search his person, the information constituting probable cause for the search and there not being sufficient time to secure a warrant.

It would avail appellant nothing if we reinstated the appeal'and affirmed the judgment at this late hour.

The motion to recall the mandate and for permission to file motion to reinstate the appeal is refused.
#### FERGUSON v. STATE.

No. 26221.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 28, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The offense is the driving, while intoxicated, upon a public highway; the punishment, a fine of $50.

The record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

## Deletion of Agenda Item From the October 12 Open Meeting

The following item has been deleted from the list of agenda items scheduled for consideration at the October 12, 2000, Open Meeting and previously listed in the Commission's Notice of October 5, 2000.

Item No. 3. 

*Bureau:*                     Wireless Telecommunications.                

*Title:*                     Promotion of Competitive Networks in Local Telecommunications Markets (WT Docket No. 99-217); Wireless Communications Association International, Inc., Petition for Rule Making to Amend Section 1.4000 of the Commission's Rules to Preempt Restrictions on Subscriber Premises Reception or Transmission Antennas Designed to Provide Fixed Wireless Services; Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (CC Docket No. 96-98); and Review of Sections 68.104, and 68.213 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Connection of Simple Inside Wiring to Telephone Network (CC Docket No. 88-57).                

*Summary:*                     The Commission will consider a First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making in WT Docket No. 99-217, a Fourth Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order in CC Docket No. 96-98, and a Memorandum Opinion and Order in CC Docket No. 88-57), regarding obstacles to consumer's choice of telecommunications providers in multiple tenant environments.                

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26781  Filed 10-13-00; 2:49 pm]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M