alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ R u b e n E C a r l o s ( F A A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 1 4 0 4 )

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : W e d n e s d a y

, J u l y 0 8

, 2 0 1 5 3 : 1 3 P M

T o : R u b e n

. E

. C a r l o s @ g m a i l

. c o m

D e a r M r

. C a r l o s :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 1 4 0 4 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r

8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e

c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y

o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y

o u r i n t e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t e d

r e s p o n s e d a t e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 7 / 2 2 / 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f

e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 4 2 6 4

.

S i n c e r e l y ,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

MATTHEW DUNLEAVY

v.

THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RAMC TRUST,

SERIES 2016

- CTT

PETITION OF: MATTHEW DUNLEAVY :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 19 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of August, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
H. R. 2754 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To amend the Hobby Protection Act to make unlawful the provision of assistance 

or support in violation of that Act, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Collectible Coin Protection Act’’. 

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE OR SUPPORT. 

The Hobby Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 2101 et seq.) is amended— 

(1) in section 2— 

(A) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘, or the sale in 

commerce’’ after ‘‘distribution in commerce’’; 

(B) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e) 

and inserting after subsection (c) the following: 

‘‘(d) PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE OR SUPPORT.—It shall be a violation of subsection (a) or (b) for a person to provide substantial 

assistance or support to any manufacturer, importer, or seller if 

that person knows or should have known that the manufacturer, 

importer, or seller is engaged in any act or practice that violates 

subsection (a) or (b).’’; and 

(C) in subsection (e) (as so redesignated), by striking 

‘‘and (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b), and (d)’’; 

(2) in section 3— 

(A) by striking ‘‘If any person’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) IN

GENERAL.—If any person’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘or has an agent’’ and inserting ‘‘, 

has an agent, transacts business, or wherever venue is 

proper under section 1391 of title 28, United States Code’’; 

and 

(C) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(b) TRADEMARK VIOLATIONS.—If the violation of section 2 (a) 

or (b) or a rule under section 2(c) also involves unauthorized use 

of registered trademarks belonging to a collectibles certification 

service, the owner of such trademarks shall have, in addition to 

the remedies provided in subsection (a), all rights provided under 

sections 34, 35, and 36 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. 

1116, 1117, and 1118) for violations of such Act.’’; and 

(3) in section 7, by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(8) The term ‘collectibles certification service’ means a 

person recognized by collectors for providing independent certification that collectible items are genuine. 

‘‘(9) The term ‘Trademark Act of 1946’ means the Act 

entitled ‘An Act to provide for the registration and protection 
H. R. 2754—2 

of trademarks used in commerce, to carry out the provisions 

of certain international conventions, and for other purposes’, 

approved July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.).’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6619

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERTO ANTOINE DARDEN, a/k/a Dizz-e, a/k/a Javon,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:11-cr-00052-AWA-LRL-1)

Submitted: June 17, 2022 Decided: August 15, 2022

Before DIAZ, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roberto Antoine Darden, Appellant Pro Se. Jacqueline Romy Bechara, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6619 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/15/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Roberto Antoine Darden seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district court’s prior order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). See generally United 

States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 400 & n.7 (4th Cir. 2015). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner 

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 

759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Darden has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We deny Darden’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6619 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/15/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
September 27, 2011

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01)

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Subject: Meeting with American Electric Power (AEP)

Attendees :

Peter Tsirigotis, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD Kevin Culligan, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD Robert J. Wayland, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD Bill Maxwell, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD John McManus, AEP John Hendricks, AEP Scott Weaver, AEP Janet Henry, AEP Paul Jackson, AEP Frank Blake, AEP Bruce Brain, AEP

Discussion :

A general discussion was held of the comment s submitted by AEP on the proposed Mercury and

Air Toxics Standards.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 30, 2021

NO. 03-19-00286-CR

Jaime Villanueva Castro, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 390TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was partial reversible error in 

the trial court’s judgment. The Court affirms the trial court’s judgment in part and vacates in 

part. A double-jeopardy violation exists, therefore the Court vacates Castro’s conviction on 

Count 2 for the second-degree felony offense of indecency with a child by sexual contact and the 

related prison sentence, and otherwise affirms the district court’s judgment of conviction on 

Count 1 for the first-degree felony offense of aggravated sexual assault of a young child.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of J.Crew Group, Inc.



|                           |  |                        |  |                                          
|-------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary         |  | State of Incorporation |  | Name under which Subsidiary Does Business
|J.Crew Operating Corp.     |  | Delaware               |  | J.Crew Operating Corp.                   
|J.Crew Inc.                |  | Delaware               |  | J.Crew Inc.                              
|Grace Holmes, Inc.         |  | Delaware               |  | J.Crew Retail Stores                     
|H.F.D. No. 55, Inc.        |  | Delaware               |  | J.Crew Factory Stores                    
|Madewell, Inc.             |  | Delaware               |  | Madewell Retail Stores                   
|J.Crew Virginia, Inc.      |  | Virginia               |  | J.Crew Virginia, Inc.                    
|J.Crew International, Inc. |  | Delaware               |  | J.Crew International, Inc.               
|C&W Outlet, Inc.*          |  | New York               |  | C&W Outlet, Inc.                         
|ERL, Inc.*                 |  | New Jersey             |  | ERL, Inc.                                



|* | Inactive subsidiary
|- | -------------------
EX-10.6
                            PROMISSORY NOTE

                            PROMISSORY NOTE

Principal amount $10,000.00                        Date: February 6, 2004

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, RMD Technologies, Inc. hereby promise to
pay to the order of Patrick A. Galliher the sum of Ten Thousand
Dollars, together with interest thereon at the rate of 1% per month on
the unpaid balance. Said sum shall be paid upon demand.

     This note shall at the option of any holder thereof be
immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of any of the
following:  1) Breach of any condition of any security interest,
mortgage, loan agreement, pledge agreement or guarantee granted as
collateral security for this note. 2) Breach of any condition of any
loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage, if any, having a
priority over any loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage on
collateral granted, in whole or in part, as collateral security for
this note. 3) Upon the death, incapacity, dissolution or liquidation
of any of the undersigned, or any endorser, guarantor to surety
hereto. 4) Upon the filing by any of the undersigned of an assignment
for the benefit of creditors, bankruptcy or other form of insolvency,
or by suffering an involuntary petition in bankruptcy or receivership
not vacated within thirty (30) days.

     In the event this note shall be in default and placed for
collection, then the undersigned agree to pay all reasonable attorney
fees and costs of collection. All payments hereunder shall be made to
such address as may from time to time be designated by any holder.

     The undersigned and all other parties to this note, whether as
endorsers, guarantors or sureties, agree to remain fully bound until
this note shall be fully paid and waive demand, presentment and
protest and all notices hereto and further agree to remain bound,
notwithstanding any extension, modification, waiver, or other
indulgence or discharge or release of any obligor hereunder or
exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as
security for this note. No modification or indulgence by any holder
hereof shall be binding unless in writing; and any indulgence on any
one occasion shall not be an indulgence for any other or future
occasion. Any modification or change in terms, hereunder granted by
any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon each of the
undersigned, notwithstanding the acknowledgement of any of the
undersigned, and each of the undersigned does hereby irrevocably grant
to each of the others a power of attorney to enter into any such
modification on their behalf. The rights of any holder hereof shall be
cumulative and not necessarily successive. This note shall take effect
as a sealed instrument and shall be construed, governed and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

RMD Technologies, Inc.


By: /s/  Pat Galliher
Pat Galliher, President
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 205 (Monday, October 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27173]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


President's Commission on the Celebration of Women in American 
History

AGENCY: General Services Administration.

ACTION: Meeting notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the President's Commission on the 
Celebration of Women in American History will hold an open meeting from 
1:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Wednesday, November 15, 2000, at the George 
Washington University, Marvin Center Room 403.

PURPOSE: To discuss the Commission's final report and how to elaborate 
its message to the President.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Davis (202) 501-0705, Assistant 
to the Associate Administrator for Communications, General Services 
Administration. Also, inquiries may be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84e9e5f6f0ece5aae0e5f2edf7c4e3f7e5aae3ebf2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c2afa3b0b6aaa3eca6a3b4abb182a5b1a3eca5adb4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 17, 2000.
Beth Newburger,
Associate Administrator for Communications.
[FR Doc. 00-27173 Filed 10-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## Patricia A. Larson Attorney at Law P. O. Box 13921 Palm Desert, CA 92255 Phone: (760) 360 - 9869 Fax: (760) 772 - 0107 Email: ucla1949@aol.com SBN: 149047 January 31, 2013 To: **Ken Israels**
– Grants and Program Integration Office

75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Re: **Docket ID No. EPA -** **OAR -**  **2012 -** **0936 Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes;**  **California; Morongo Band of Mission Indians**  **Comments for the Record on the above Docket**  From: **Patricia A. Larson** First let me introduce myself: I have lived in the Coachella Valley for over 59 years. Iserved as the 4th District Supervisor for Riverside County fo r 3 terms starting in 1983. I only found out about this special interest proposal yeste rday. N othing has been in the newspapers that I have seen. Yet comment period ends tomorrow. I have read Barry Wallerstein’s (SCAQMD) letter of 1 - 25 - 2013 to you and wish, for the sake of time, to incorporate his points on the matter within my comments here. As we ll, I support the CVAG points in its comment letter sent to you on January 28 th

. Lastly, I would point out that the proposed district would be small and wo uld be dominated by a single, major entity which could control the decision - makers, in effect, regulating its own development interests. If instead of “Morongo Tribe”, we substituted “XYZ Corporation”, would this arrangement be tolerated? The small area has major air quality impacts in all directions affecting large populations. It makes no sense except for the special interest.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62365-62366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26927]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Invasive Species Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting of the Invasive Species Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, notice is hereby given of meeting of the Invasive Species Advisory 
Committee. The purpose of the Advisory Committee is to provide advice 
to the Council, as authorized by Executive Order 13112, on a broad 
array of issues related to preventing the introduction of invasive 
species and providing for their control and minimizing the economic, 
ecological, and human health impacts that invasive species cause. The 
meeting on October 24 will be a joint meeting of the Advisory Committee 
and various Federal Agency Officials. The meeting on October 25 will 
consist of the Advisory Committee only. Both meetings will be open to 
the public. Attendance will be limited to space available.

DATES: Meeting of Invasive Species Advisory Committee and Federal 
Agencies: 8:00 a.m.-4:15 p.m., Tuesday October 24, 2000; Meeting of 
Advisory Committee only: 8:30 a.m.-3:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 25, 
2000.

ADDRESSES: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Conservation 
Training Center, Shepherdstown, WV. The October 24th meeting will be 
held in the Auditorium. The October 25th meeting will be held in the 
Instructional West Building, Room 170.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelsey Passe, National Invasive 
Species Council Program Analyst; E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e48f818897819dbb9485979781a48d8b97ca808b8dca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="573c323b24322e082736242432173e38247933383e79303821">[email protected]</span></a>; 
Phone: (202) 208-6336; Fax: (202) 208-1526.


[[Page 62366]]


    Dated: October 16, 2000.
Lori Williams,
Executive Director, National Invasive Species Council.
[FR Doc. 00-26927 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Storage Technology Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 27, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Robert S. Kocol, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Robert S. Kocol
-------------------
Robert S. Kocol
Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2002
Exhibit 10-I Description of Matching Gift Program for Non-Employee Directors.**


    Exhibit
      10-I

    


    Description
      of Matching Gift Program and 

    Vehicle
      Evaluation Program for Non-Employee Directors

    


    Effective
      November 1, 2005, the matching gift program was discontinued. Under that
      program, non-employee directors could give up to $25,000 per year to certain
      tax-exempt organizations under the Ford Fund Matching Gift Program. For each
      dollar given, the Ford Motor Company Fund contributed two dollars. The Company
      also provides directors with the use of company vehicles at an estimated average
      value for 2005 of approximately $28,000 per director. The directors are expected
      to provide evaluations of the vehicles to the Company.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER AND N OTICE OF I NTENT TO D ISMISS

Appellate case name: Elizabeth Copeland v. Barry Copeland

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00680

- CV

Trial court case number: 2012

- 39055

Trial court: 311t h District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed February 4, 2015 is

GRANTED , with no further extensions . Appellant’s brief is due March 6, 2015.

Appellant has previously been informed that no further exten sions will be granted. If

appellant’s brief is not filed by March 6, 2015, this case may be dismissed for want of

prosecution without further notice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a); 42.3(b), (c).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/

_ Rebeca Huddle

X Ac ting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 12, 2015
#### In re Rubenstein. (Two cases.)

(Nos. 28011 and 28012

Decided February 14, 1940.)

*Mr. Martin J. Monahen,*for appellants, Joseph Rubenstein and Charles Rubenstein.

*342
      *Mr. Charles Auerbach, Mr. James B. Dolphin*and *Mr. George Brown,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said causes.

*Appeals dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03536

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
#### SCOTT v. STATE.

No. 27033.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 2, 1954.

*673No attorney on appeal.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of the liquor law in Lubbock County. The punishment assessed is a fine of $250.

No notice of appeal appears m the record. In the absence thereof this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.