alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Leland KINNAMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 23742.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 11, 1947.

No appearance, for appellant.

Ernest S. G.oens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for assault with intent to murder, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary. .

Appellant has filed with this court his personal affidavit advising that he no longer desires to prosecute his appeal, and at his request same is dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4759

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ERIC CHRISTOPHER LOCKLEAR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CR-03-32)

Submitted: May 25, 2005 Decided: June 15, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Geoffrey Wuensch Hosford, HOSFORD & HOSFORD, Wilmington, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney,

Anne M. Hayes, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States

Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Eric Christopher Locklear, a federal prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release

and imposing a 24-month term of imprisonment. We conclude that

Locklear’s notice of appeal is untimely. A notice of appeal in a

criminal case must be filed within ten days of the entry of

judgment being appealed. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1). The district

court, upon a finding of excusable neglect or good cause, may

extend the time period for filing a notice of appeal an additional

thirty days. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4). The appeal periods

established by Rule 4 are mandatory and jurisdictional. Browder v.

Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978); United States v.

Raynor, 939 F.2d 191, 197 (4th Cir. 1991). Locklear’s judgment

revoking supervised release and imposing a 24-month term of

imprisonment was entered on July 24, 2003. He did not file a

notice of appeal until, at the earliest, August 18, 2003, outside

the ten-day appeal period. The district court found that Locklear

did not show excusable neglect or good cause to excuse the late

filing. Thus, Locklear’s appeal is untimely. Accordingly, we

dismiss Locklear’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 18



Mr. Stephen L. Clanton
Chief Financial Officer
DESA Holdings Corporation
236 Public Square, Suite 103
Franklin, Tennessee 37064

Dear Mr. Clanton:

Note  1  of  Notes  to  Consolidated   Financial  Statements  of  DESA  Holdings
Corporation  included  in its Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended March 3, 2001
describes a change in the method of accounting for inventories from the last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method to the first-in,  first-out (FIFO) method.  There are no
authoritative  criteria for determining a "preferable"  inventory costing method
based on the particular circumstances;  however, we conclude that such change in
the method of accounting is to an acceptable  alternative method which, based on
your  business  judgment  to make this  change  and for the stated  reasons,  is
preferable in your circumstances.

                                                     Very truly yours,

                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                     Ernst & Young LLP

Nashville, Tennessee
April 13, 2001
May 12, 2005


Mr. Robert Ginsburg
Marlton Technologies, Inc.
2828 Charter Road
Philadelphia, PA 19154

Re:  Employment Agreement dated November 20, 2001

Dear Bob:

      Confirming the actions of the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of Marlton Technologies, Inc. ("Company"):

      Effective January 1, 2005, your annual base salary was changed to $200,000
based on your commitment to devote not less than 80% of your business time to
Marlton, subject to further adjustment, based on an annual rate of $250,000 for
100% of your business time, if and when you devote more or less of your business
time to the Company.

      As described in Note 7 of the Item 11 Summary Compensation Table included
in the Company's Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, you
have waived (i) your rights to the salary reductions described in Notes 2, 3 and
6 of such Table, and (ii) except as contemplated by Note 4 to such Table, your
entitlement pursuant to your Employment Agreement to parity with Scott Tarte and
Jeffrey Harrow in salary and bonus for all periods through December 31, 2004.

      The following phrase shall be added to the end of the last sentence of
Section 5(a) of your Employment Agreement: ", subject to proportionate reduction
in the event the Employee devotes less than 100% of his business time to the
Company."

      The Company shall provide you with reimbursement of life and disability
insurance premiums of up to $9,500 per year.

      You have waived the requirement under your Employment Agreement and under
the Stockholders' Agreement dated November 20, 2001 that the Company and its
Board of Directors use their best efforts to cause you to be elected and
re-elected to the Company's Board of Directors, as long as the Company provides
you with Board observer rights allowing you to receive notice and all materials
for Board meetings as provided to Board members and the right to attend Board
meetings without voting rights.

      The provisions of your Employment Agreement relating to the above subject
matter are superseded by this amendment; otherwise the Employment Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms and shall
constitute the legal, valid and binding agreement of the Company.


                                       ---------------------------------
                                       Richard Vague
                                       Chairman of Compensation Committee

Agreed this _____ day of May, 2005.


----------------------------------
       Robert B. Ginsburg
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRUCE ALLEN HASKINS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 430 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRUCE ALLEN HASKINS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 431 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of March, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (3) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                March 28, 2006 | By:*/s/*Yiliang                Lai     |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                | Yiliang                Lai             |
|                                | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
The Board of Directors

Norfolk SouthernRailway Company:

 

 

Re:  Registration Statement No. 333-114795 on FormS-4.

 

With respect to the subjectregistration statement, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of ourreport datedJuly 27, 2004related to our reviews of interim financial information.

 

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under theSecurities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of aregistration statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a reportprepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11of the Act.

 

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Norfolk,Virginia

July 29, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CO-600-01-1220-AL-1784]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice; Southwest Resource Advisory Council meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the Southwest Resource Advisory Council (Southwest RAC) will meet in November 2000 in Montrose, Colorado. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Thursday, November 9, 2000. 

      ( print page 63092)    

# ADDRESSES:

For additional information, contact Roger Alexander, Bureau of Land Management, 2465 South Townsend Avenue, Montrose, Colorado 81401; phone 970-240-5335; TDD 970-240-5366; e-mail roger_alexander@co.blm.gov. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The November 9, 2000 meeting will be held at the Bureau of Land Management—North Building Conference Room, 2465 South Townsend, Montrose, Colorado. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and end at approximately 4:30 p.m. The agenda will include presentations on BLM's fire management program and the Uncompahgre Plateau Habitat Project, and BLM business updates (recreation guidelines, BLM organizational changes in western Colorado, etc.). General public comment is scheduled for 9:15 a.m. 

Summary minutes for Council meetings are maintained in BLM's North Building in Montrose and on the World Wide Web at www.co.blm.gov/​swrac/​swrac.htm and are available for public inspection and reproduction within thirty (30) days following each meeting. 

Dated: October 16, 2000. 

Roger Alexander, 

Public Affairs Specialist. 

[FR Doc. 00-27051 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
Joint Stipulation of Dismissal Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

DOUBLE T INTERESTS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF AUSTIN,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-646-RP

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Double T. Interests, LLC and Defendant City of Austin file this 

stipulation of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 

1. Plaintiff is Double T Interests, LLC; Defendant is City of Austin.

2. Plaintiff filed an Original Petition, Cause No. D-1-GN-20-000899 in the 

250th Judicial District Court, Travis County, Texas on February 13, 2020.

3. Defendant City of Austin filed a Notice of Removal to remove the action 

to the United States Court for the Western District on June 19, 2020.

4. Plaintiff moves to dismiss the suit without prejudice.

5. Defendant City of Austin, who has answered, agrees to the dismissal. 

6. This case is not a class action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, 

a derivative action under Rule 23.1, or an action related to an unincorporated 

association under Rule 23.2. 

7. This case is not governed by any federal statute that requires a court 

order for dismissal of the case. 

8. A receiver has not been appointed in this case. 

Case 1:20-cv-00646-RP Document 45 Filed 06/21/21 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice Page 2

9. This dismissal is without prejudice. 

Date: June 21, 2021 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

/s/ John R. McConnell

John R. McConnell

Texas Bar No. 24053351

THOMAS WILLIAMS MCCONNELL PLLC

1100 Norwood Tower

114 West 7th Street

Austin, Texas 78701

Telephone: (512) 495-1471

Facsimile: (512) 499-0094

Email: jm@twmattorneys.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

DOUBLE T INTERESTS, LLC

/s/ Hannah M. Vahl

Hannah M. Vahl

Assistant City Attorney

State Bar. No. 24082377

CITY OF AUSTIN LAW DEPARTMENT

P.O. Box 1546

Austin, Texas 78767-1546

Telephone: (512) 974-2346

Facsimile: (512) 974-1311

Email: hannah.vahl@austintexas.gov

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

CITY OF AUSTIN

Case 1:20-cv-00646-RP Document 45 Filed 06/21/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas S. Smith, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Silver Mines, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and we have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 13, 2009

By:    /s/ Thomas S. Smith



Thomas S. Smith, President and Director



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>                    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             12
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     332
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                       470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  876
<PP&E>                                            490
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             493
<BONDS>                                           216
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           38
<OTHER-SE>                                        506
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,735
<SALES>                                           975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  975
<CGS>                                             640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   166
<INCOME-TAX>                                       58
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               108
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.87
        

</TABLE>
Related cases: 

Health related cases: 

Concem levels: 

Type of Concern: 

Level of Concern: 

Health 

1-2 

Persistence 

1 

1 

3 

Exposure Based Review: 

Health: 

Ecotox:No 

Routes of exposure: 

Keywords: 

SAT Report 

PMN Number: P-15-0109 

SAT Date: 12/12/2014 

Print Date: 10/1/2015 

- Yes 

Eco Comments 

2 

Bioaccum 

1 

1 

1 

Toxicity 

2 

2 

2 

Comments 

Health: Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water 

Fate: · 

Keywords: RETINOPATHY; DEVEL; MUTA; ONCO; AQUATOX 

Summary of Assessment: 

Fate: 

log Kow = 1.23 (E) 

log Koc = 1.50 (E) 

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) 

log Fish BAF = 0.09 

FATE: Estimations 
log Kow = 2.39 (E) 

log Koc = 2.40 (E) 

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) 

log Fish BAF = 0.54 

FATE: Estimations 

log Kow = 1.59 

log Koc = 3.33 (E) 

log Fish BCF = 0.72 (E) 

log Fish BAF = 0.60 (E) 

PMN Substance: Solid 

S > 1 giL at 25 oc (E) 

VP < 1.0E-6 ton at 25 oc (E) 

BP > 400 oc (E) 

H < 1.00E-8 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 

Health: 

Health Summary: Not absorbed from the skin, moderate absmption from 

the GI tract and good absmption from the lung . Concem for · , mutagenicity, 

oncogenicity, ty for the ; developmental 

toxicity for the - . 

Ecotox: 

Test Test Test End Predicted Measured Comments 

Organism Type Point 

fish 96-h LC50 >100 

daphnid 48-h LC50 7.3 

green algal 96-h EC50 10.4 

fish chronic 0.58 - value 

daphnid chronic 0.11 - value 

algal - chronic 2.6 

value 

~ 3-h EC50 - lud ~ 
ewag~ 

Sludg 

I Chronic I 

Value 

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for--SAR 

chemical class=-- solid with unknown mp(P); log Kow = 1.6 

(P,- S = > 1000 mg/L at 20 C (P, _.-pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% 

active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaC03; and 

TOC <2.0 mg/L; 

Comments 

• 

• . I • • • 

I I 

I I I I • I I 

••• I I 

• I 

• I 

. I 

"' !I 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

SAT Chair: 

Fate assessor:
**Exhibit 32(ii)**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

                In connect with the quarterly report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedFebruary 28, 2011 to befiled with Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

                (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

                (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

                It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| Date: April 14, 2011     | By: | /s/ Mark V. McDonough      |
|----------------------------------------------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |     | Mark V. McDonough,Chief Financial Officer           |
##### 



Exhibit 10.45
   
   Appendix A Appendix
A
 [signature page follows]




---



##### 



CSK AUTO, INC.By:
    
    /s/ LAWRENCE N. MONDRYName: Lawrence N. MondryTitle: President and Chief Executive OfficerCSK AUTO CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ LAWRENCE N. MONDRYName: Lawrence N. MondryTitle: President and Chief Executive OfficerEXECUTIVERandi Morrison/s/ RANDI VAL MORRISON




---



##### 




    
    All work-related utilities and home office cable/internet
    
    Payment for work-related equipment (e.g., phones, computer, internet service, printer, fax
machine and overnight mail service) at your residence in Los Angeles, California
    
    All work related office supplies
    
    Cab fare, rental car or company car for your use while in Phoenix, Arizona
    
    Weekly travel (such reimbursement consistent with past practices and the Companys existing
travel policy) between Phoenix, Arizona and your residence in Los Angeles, California