# Q

U.S . Departmen t ?.° ° '."""Ef^l^^f^n^^ H ®•^ • o f Transportatio n Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Washington , D.C . 2069 1 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Novembe r

4,201 0 Mr . Antoni o M . Sabin o Soa r Minden , Inc. , & Minde n Aviation , Inc . P O Bo x 176 4 113 8 Airport

Road Minden , N V 8942 3 Re : Soar

Minden . Inc. . & Minde n Aviation . Inc. . v . Dougla s Count y Airport . FA A Docke t

No . 16-10-0 6 Dea r Mr . Sabino : Th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ('TAA" ) receive dyour lette r submitte da s you r

Par t 1 6 Complain t

date dOctober

27,2010 . Th e lette r

an dattachment s ar e bein g returne dt o yo u an d you r complain t

i s dismisse dpursuan t

t o 1 4 CF R§ 16.27 becaus e i t

i s incomplete an dyou r submission s d o no t

mee t th e requirement s under

1 4 CF RPar t 1 6 t o serv e a s acomplaint . Specifically , th e complaint :

• Wa s no t

serve db y th e prope r

metho da s require db y 1 4 CFR§16.13(b ) i n tha t i t wa s no t sen t b y persona l delivery , mail , o r facsimil e followe db y personal deliver o r mai l to th e proper

parties .

• Does no t

hav e o n th e fii^t

pag e o f th e Complaint

alis t informatio n o f

th e person(s ) t o receiv e servic e a s require db y 1 4 CFR§ 16.13(f) .

• Doe s no t

contai n aCertificate o f

Servic e a s require db y 1 4 CFR§16.15 .

• Does no t

contai n sufficien

t informatio n t o sho w tha

t th e Complainant

initiate d an dengage di n goo dfait

h effort s t o resolv e th e dispute dmatter informall y wit

h thos e individual s or

entitie s beUevedresponsibl e fo r th e noncomplianc e a s require db y 1 4 CF

R§ 16.21(a) , Mediatio n i n arelate ddistric t cour t proceedin g i s no t considere dinforma

l resolutio n require dunder thi s Part ,

• Does no t

certif y tha t substantial an dreasonabl e goo dfait h effort s t o resolv e th e dispute dmatter

wer e mad e informally prio r t o filing th e complain t

an dtha t ther e appear s n o reasonabl e prospec t fo r timel y resolutio n o f

th e dispute . Further , i t doe s not includ e abrie f

descriptio n o f

th e party' s efforts t o obtai n informa l resolutio n a s requu-e db y 1 4 CF R§16.21(b) .• Doe s no t state th e nam e an daddres s o f eac h perso n wh o i s th e subjec t o f th e complain t and , with respec t

t o eac h person , ^ e specifi c provision s o f eac h Ac t that th e complainan t

believe s wer e violate das require db y 1 4 CFR§16.23(b)(l) . • Doe s no t

sho w tha t th e Complainan t

serve dth e proper

partie s involve da s require db y 1 4 CFR§ 16.23(b)(2) . • Doe s not

provid e aconcis e bu t

complet e statement

o f th e fact s relie dupo n t o substantiat e eac h allegatio n a s require db y 1 4 CFR§16.23(b)(3) . • Doe s no t

describ e ho w th e complainant wa s directi y andsubstantiall y affecte db y th e thing s don e o r

omitte dt o b e don e b y th e respondent s a s require db y 1 4 CFR §r6.23(b)(4) . Accordingly , th e complaint i s dismisse dwithou t

prejudic e a s incomplete unde r 1 4 C.F.R . § 16.2 7 t o allo w th e Complainant s th e opportunit y t o correc t

th e deficiencie s note dabove . Par t 1 6 Docke t No . 16-10-0 6 i s hereb y closed . Yo u ma y file ane w complaint

consisten t

with th e requirement s o f

Par t 16 . Shoul dyo u hav e any question s o n thi s matter , pleas e cal l m e a t 202-267-9676 . Sincerely ,

aymondVeatc h Attorney , Airport

La w (AGC-610 ) Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D.C . 2059 1 enclosures : you r

complain t

an dit s attachment s cc : ACO-lO O (withou t enclosures ) Part 1 6 Docke t

Cler k (withou t enclosures )