alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
05/05/2010 14:2G FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS iaoOI/002 

i?i Ur li .uHiAl ATIHM 

KFORE TUE 

DEPARTMEN I OF 

FEDJERAL AVIATION 

U^ftTED SI ATES 

TI ANSPORTATION 

ADMINISTRATION 

In Ihc Matter of 

FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. 

Docket No. FAA-2009-1040 

FAA Case No- 2008NM21()C)20 

FAA Docket No. CP09NM0013 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FOR HEARING 

Pursuant to 14 CFR 13.215, Respondent Frontier Airlines, Inc. ("Frontier") hereby 

withdraws its request for hearing in the above referenced matter. On April 29, 2010, the parties 

agreed to settle the matter, and the request is now moot. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Kenneth P.' )uir 

J cmnfcrJE, J "rock 

PILksffyRY WINTHROP 

SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

2300 N Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C 20037 

Tel: (202) 663-8000 

Fax:(202) 663-8007 

E-mail: kquinn@pillsburylaw.com 

jtroek@pillsburylaw.com 

Counsel for Frontier Airlines, Inc. 

Dated: April 30,2010 
05/05/2010 14:2G FAX 2024935142 FAA + OMS 12002/002 

CERTIFTCAl E OF SERVICE 

1, Timothy C. Gerhcim, hereby certify that I have this, the 30th day of April, 2010, caused a copy 

of the foregoing document to be served to the following persons via facsimile and U.S. First 

Class mail: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attention; Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20.'>91 

FAX: 202-493-5142 

(Original and one copy) 

Scott R. Morris, Attorney 

Federal Aviation Admini.strati on 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

1601 Lind Avenue S.W. 

Ronton, W A 98057-3356 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor 

RoomEl2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Timothy C. Gerhcim 

Pillsbury Wintlirop Shaw Pittman LLP 

2300 N St. NW 

Washington. DC 20037
### NUMBER 13

- 1 4

- 00 3 1 0

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

GRAY, RITTER & GRAHA M, PC; WOLF Appellants,

HALDENSTEIN ADLER FR EEMAN &

HERZ, LLC; NEBLETT B EARD &

ARSENAULT, LLP; DON M. DOWNING;

AND ADAM J. LEVITT

,

v

.

GOLDMAN PHIPPS PLLC F/K/A

GOLDMAN PENNEBAKER & PHIPPS,

PC; MIKAL C. WATTS, PC; AND

MURRAY LAW FIRM

, A ppellees.

On Appellants’ Emergency Motion to

Stay All Proceedings in the Underlying Lawsuit

.



## ORDER2



### Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellants Gray, Ritter & Graham, PC

, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz,

LLC

, Neblett Beard & Arsenault, LLP

, Don M. Downing

, and Adam J. Levitt perfected an

interlocutory appeal from an order rendered by the County Court at Law Number 3 of

Nueces County, Texas

, in trial court cause number 2012

- CCV

- 62122

- 3

, denying

appellants ’ special appearance

. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 51.014( a)(7)

(West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (authorizing interlocutory appeal of order granting

or denying special appearance). Appellants have filed a n “Emergency M otion to S tay A ll

P ro ceedings in the U nderlying Lawsuit” during the pendency of the appeal. Appellees

Goldman Phipps PLLC f/k/a Goldman Pennebaker & Phipps, PC

, Mikal C. Watts, PC

,

and Murray Law Firm filed a response to the motion.

Having reviewed appellants’ motion and appellees’ response, we hereby GRANT

the motion in part and DENY it in part. We order all proceedings in trial court cause

number 2012

- CCV

- 62122

- 3 STAYED until further order of this Court , EXCEPT that the

stay shall not apply to discovery requests propounded upon any party that is not named

as a n appellant in this appeal

. Any such discovery requests shall proceed during the

pendency of this appeal according to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Order d elivered and filed the

2 5th day of September , 201 4

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0660 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. JOSHUA DUANE WOLFBLACK,

Defendant and Appellant,

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time until March 20 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 22 2024

02/22/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0660
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00039-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.E.G., B.M.A. Jr., and A.G.A., Children

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-PA-00239

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA, JUSTICE WATKINS, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order of Termination 

is AFFIRMED. Because appellant is indigent, no costs of this appeal are assessed against 

appellant.

SIGNED May 25, 2022.

_____________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP98-43-013]

                    Take notice that on May 18, 2000, Anadarko Gathering Company (AGC) tendered for filing its 1999 Kansas Ad Valorem Tax Annual Report in the above-referenced docket pursuant to the Commission's Order Denying Petitions for Adjustment and Establishing Procedures for the Payment of Refunds, issued September 10, 1997, in Docket No. RP97-369-000,                     *et. al.*                     (September 10, 1997 Order).                

AGC states that the information provided in the May 1999 Annual Report has not changed in the past twelve months. Thus AGC incorporates by reference therein the May 1999 Annual Report and respectfully requests that the Commission accept its letter filing as being in compliance with the Ordering Paragraph (E) of the September 10, 1997 Order.

AGC states that copies of its filing have been provided to all parties and the Kansas Corporation Commission.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before October 23, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26699  Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Ex parte MEZA.

No. 23086.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 14, 1945.

J. Meek Hawkins, of Houston, for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Cr. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Brancn, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., both of Houston, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Relator was at large under a conditional pardon granted him by the Governor of this State on September 25, 1944, and was paroled to Harris County, Texas. It is evident from the record that it was reported to the Governor that relator had violated some of the conditions of this pardon, and upon such report the Governor issued his proclamation revoking such pardon, and ordering the reincarceration of relator in the penitentiary. Acting under such order, the sheriff of Harris County took relator into his custody, and thereaft-erwards relator sued out a writ of habeas *445corpus, which was granted by and heard before Hon. Frank Williford, Jr., Judge of the Criminal District Court of Harris County. Upon such hearing the relator was remanded to the custody of the sheriff of that county to be transferred to the State penitentiary for the purpose of serving the remaining portion of his sentence. To this action of the court relator appeals.

Undoubtedly the Governor has the right to issue a conditional pardon, placing therein such conditions as deemed by him advisable, and when such pardon is accepted by the convict, he is bound by such conditions. See Ex parte Frazier, 91 Tex.Cr.R. 475, 239 S.W. 972.

It is evident from the revocation proclamation that relator had violated the terms and conditions of his pardon, and under such pardon the Governor had the power to revoke the same, he being the sole arbiter as to the wisdom thereof. See Ex parte Ferdin, Tex.Crim.App., 183 S.W. 2d 466.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### The State, ex rel. Ahrens, Appellant, *v.*Zupnik et al., Appellees.

(No. 27677

Decided December 13, 1939.)

*157*Messrs. Gurry <& McCabe*and *Mr. A. F. Gallagher,*for appellant.

*Mr. Henry 8. Brainard,*director of law, and *Mr. Charles W. White,*for appellees.

By the Court.

Appellant claims to be entitled to a pension by virtue of Section 23(a) of the Rules and Regulations of the Board of Trustees of the Cleveland Police Relief Fund, which provides: “If any *member of the division of police*shall have died from any cause not directly attributed to an injury or injuries sustained in line of duty, and shall leave a widow (as herein defined) or minor child or children ** * **such widow or minor child or children shall be placed upon the police relief roll and receive the following amounts monthly * * (Italics ours.)

Nowhere in the petition is it alleged that appellant is the widow of a “member of the division of police.” It affirmatively appears that she is not the widow of such a member, for the petition alleges her deceased spouse was appointed and served as a patrolman until “he was persuaded and induced by coercion and duress, to tender his resignation in the division of police.”

This court at page 427 of the opinion in the former case did not approve the theory of appellant that Roy Ahrens never eeased to be a member of the division of police.

The Court of Appeals did not err in rendering judg*158ment on authority of *State, ex rel. Ahrens,*v. *City of Cleveland, supra.*

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Day, J., dissents.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunair Electronics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 14, 2005 (the Report), I, Synnott B. Durham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Synnott B. DurhamSynnott B. DurhamTreasurer and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 14, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary of Defense

# AGENCY:

Advisory Group on Electron Devices, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Working Group A (Microwave Devices) of the DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held at 0900, Wednesday, December 13, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research Services, Inc. 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Cox, AGED Secretariat, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The mission of the Advisory Group is to provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) and the Military Departments in planning and managing an effective and economical research and development program in the area of electron devices.

The Working Group A meeting will be limited to review of research and development programs which the Military Departments propose to initiate with industry, universities or in their laboratories. This microwave device area includes programs on developments and research related to microwave tubes, solid state microwave devices, electronic warfare devices, millimeter wave devices, and passive devices. The review will include details of classified defense programs throughout.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, (5 U.S.C. App. § 10(d) (1994)), it has been determined that this Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: October 17, 2000.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-27198  Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         127,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  489,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,754
<INVENTORY>                                    393,727
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,008,437
<PP&E>                                         153,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                 108,192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,813,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          315,049
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,326
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,402,489
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,813,864
<SALES>                                        651,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               651,259
<CGS>                                          425,558
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  425,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,442)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,442)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,442)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FRIM

     We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-126211) of Zone 4 Play, Inc. of our report dated
April 14, 2008, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements
of the Company as of December 31, 2007, which report appears in this Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Zone 4 Play, Inc. Our report contains an explanatory
paragraph regarding the company's ability to continue as a going concern.

                                             /s/ Ziv Haft
                                             --------------
                                             Ziv Haft
                                             Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
                                             BDO Member Firm
Tel-Aviv, Israel
April 14, 2008
```
Exhibit 32.1





Statement of Chief Executive Officer Furnished


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the “Company”).





This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”).





By execution of this statement, I certify that:





A)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and





B)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.





March 31, 2011
/s/ Kim S. PriceDated
Kim S. PricePresident and Chief Executive Officer







This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1396 J.J., a minor, by her parents and next friends, G.J. and J.A.; J.A.; G.J., Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY; JERRY D. WEAST, in his official capacity as Superintendent, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA02-491-PJM) Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: June 18, 2004 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeanne Asherman, ASHERMAN LAW & MEDIATION OFFICE, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellants. Edmund W. Law, Zvi Greismann, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: J.J., a disabled child, by and through her parents, appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants on her complaint filed pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2000), as well as the district court’s order denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See J.J. v. Board of Educ. of Montgomery Co. , No. CA-02-491-PJM (D. Md. Mar. 26, 2003 & Feb. 10, 2003). Given this disposition, we also deny counsel’s motions to withdraw from representation and for the appointment of new counsel. We grant the Appellees’ motion to submit this appeal on the briefs, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED