alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3079 

For the relief of Jesus Garcia Flores. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 

Mr. PASTOR of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Jesus Garcia Flores. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR JESUS 

4 GARCIA FLORES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Jesus Garcia Flores shall be eligible for issuance of 

8 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of 

9 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 

10 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa 

11 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status 

12 to lawful permanent resident. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3079 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Jesus Garcia Flo2 res enters the United States before the filing deadline 

3 specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have 

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi5 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Jesus Garcia Flores, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3079 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Jesus Garcia Flores shall 

2 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

3 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              17
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      326
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   858
<PP&E>                                             444
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              413
<BONDS>                                            222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                         536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,675
<SALES>                                          1,262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,262
<CGS>                                              830
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    208
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                133
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       133
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                              |                                                            |                             |
|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                                              | **Worldwide              Biotech & Pharmaceutical Company** |
|                                         |                                                       |                        |
| Date: May              26,              2006 | By:                                                   | /s/ Wenxia              Guo |
|                                              |                                                                 |
|                                              | Chief              Executive Officer                            |
Summary of Phone Conversations with the South Coast Air Quality Management District 

Prepared by Nicole Law 

March 23, 2011 

Phone conversation between Nicole Law (EPA) and Eugene Teszler (SCAQMD) on March 22, 2011. 

This conversation was for Nicole to get more information regarding flare minimization plans (FMPs) 

under Rule 4311 at SCAQMD. Nicole requested copies of various facility FMPs and the district 

stated that not every facility was required to submit them. Nicole then asked if every facility 

submitted reports under Rule 1118 (c)(2)(B) and (c)(2)(C). The district stated that facilities only 

submitted FMPs when the SOx emission targets were exceeded, but every facility was required to 

submit documentation required under Rule 1118 (c)(2)(B) and (c)(2)(C). Eugene Teszler then 

gave Nicole the contact information for staff in the compliance division who could obtain the 

requested documents.

Phone conversation between Nicole Law (EPA) and Melesio Hernandez (SCAQMD) on March 23, 

2011. 

The purpose of this discussion was for EPA to determine which documents required under Rule 1118 

were most appropriate to request. The district stated that since the inception of the flare 

minimization plan submittal requirements, only one facility has actually been required to submit a 

FMP and that was Ultramar/Valero Refinery. Nicole then mentioned she was interested in viewing 

the kinds of flare minimization documents that the smaller refineries submitted. It was agreed that 

Melesio would email Nicole the FMP for Ultramar /Valero Refinery and required submittals under 

Rule 1118 (c)(2)(B) and (c)(2)(C) for the smaller Paramount Petroleum and Tesoro Refinery.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06931**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 06931\06931_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06931\06931_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06931\06931_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06931\06931_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06931\06931_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06931\06931_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06931\06931_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06931\06931_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06931\Certification Statement_06931.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 06931\Supporting Documentation\06931_PPLCorette_CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06931\Supporting Documentation\06931_PPLCorette_EA_PIC_Sept_26_2006.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06931\Supporting Documentation\06931_PPLCorette_MAP-091010_Final.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06931\Supporting Documentation\06931_PPLCorette_POND-1_091010_Final.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06931\Supporting Documentation\06931_PPLCorette_WB-1_091010_Final.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 28.1

                                  [LETTERHEAD]
                                     NuVell
                            Financial Services Corp.



March 30, 1999


Dave Plante
Advanta Auto Finance Corporation
800 Ridgeview Drive
Horsham, PA  19044

RE:     Sale and Servicing Agreement dated December 1, 1997, between Advanta
        Automobile Receivables Trust 1997-2 ("Issuer"), and other parties.


Dear Mr. Plante,

A review of the activities of Nuvell Financial Services Corp. (the
"Sub-Servicer") during the preceding calendar year and of its performance under
this Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision and pursuant to
Section 4.10(a) of the Agreement. To the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Sub-Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this
Agreement during the preceding calendar year.

We understand that Advanta may provide a copy of this letter to the Trustee,
the Owner Trustee, the Trust Collateral Agent and the Insurer pursuant to
Section 4.10(a) of the Agreement.


Sincerely,


J. Robert Hardesty
Executive Vice President

cc: General Counsel




                                       15
First Amendment of the Sky Financial Group, Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock Plan



 Exhibit 10.26 
  
 FIRST
AMENDMENT 
 OF THE 
 SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 2004 RESTRICTED
STOCK PLAN 
  
 WHEREAS, this corporation maintains the Sky Financial Group, Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock Plan (the “Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of
Directors has determined that amendment of the Plan is necessary and desirable. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that, pursuant to the power reserved to the Company by Article VI
of the Plan, the Plan be and is hereby amended, effective as of the date of adoption, by substituting the following for Section 3.3 of the Plan: 
  
 “SECTION 3.3. RESTRICTED STOCK CERTIFICATES. 
  
 Restricted Stock (other than Deferred
Restricted Stock) granted under the Plan may be evidenced by one or more certificates registered in the name of the Participant and bearing an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Restricted
Stock. The Company shall retain physical possession of any such certificate, and each Participant awarded such Restricted Stock shall deliver a stock power to the Company, endorsed in blank, relating to the Restricted Stock, during the Restricted
Period. Certificates for shares of unrestricted Stock may be delivered to the Participant promptly after, and only after, the Restricted Period shall have expired without forfeiture in respect of such shares of Restricted Stock. To the extent the
Plan or any Award Agreement provides for issuance of stock certificates to reflect the issuance of shares of Common Stock, the issuance may be effected on a noncertificated basis, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law or the applicable
rules of any stock exchange.” 
  
 *        *        * 
  
 I, W Granger Souder, Jr., Secretary of Sky Financial Group, Inc., hereby certify that the foregoing is a correct copy of resolutions duly
adopted by the Board of Directors of said corporation on February 16, 2005, and that the resolutions have not been changed or repealed. 
  

			
		
	 	 	 /s/ W. Granger Souder, Jr.


	 	 	 Secretary as Aforesaid
 (Corporate Seal)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3001 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3001

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
permit commercial applicators of pesticides to create, retain, submit, 
 and convey pesticide application-related records, reports, data, and 
                 other information in electronic form.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2013

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
permit commercial applicators of pesticides to create, retain, submit, 
 and convey pesticide application-related records, reports, data, and 
                 other information in electronic form.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``21st Century Pest Management Records 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWING COMMERCIAL APPLICATORS OF PESTICIDES TO USE ELECTRONIC 
              RECORDS TO COMPLY WITH RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING 
              REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 1491 of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act 
of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 136i-1) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(h) Electronic Recordkeeping and Reporting.--Notwithstanding any 
contrary provision of Federal, State, or local law, commercial 
applicators of pesticides, including commercial applicators of 
restricted use pesticides, may create, retain, submit, and convey a 
pesticide application-related record, report, data, or other 
information in electronic form in order to satisfy any requirement for 
such creation, retention, submission, or conveyance, respectively, 
under any Federal, State, or local law.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.4

Section 302 Certification

  I, David W. Sharp, certify that: 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report of Form 10-K for the year 2003 ofHorizon Offshore, Inc.; 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

 

Date: March 15, 2004

 

/s/ David W. Sharp                                      

David W. Sharp

Executive Vice President and 

Chief Financial Officer

Horizon Offshore, Inc.
#### STATE ex rel. TODD v. MARTINEAU et al.

No. 16117.

Supreme Court of Texas.

July 14, 1943.

Gerald C. Mann, Atty. Gen., and R. W. Fairchild, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

J. D. Todd, Jr., of Corpus Christi, pro se.

Paul A. Martineau and Kemp, Lewright, Dyer & Sorrell, all of Corpus Christi, for appellee.

SHARP, Justice.

In an opinion delivered May 26, 1943, this Court held that a district attorney had no lawful authority to file a quo warranto petition in the Supreme Court to test the right or title of a district judge to his office, and for that reason the order of this Court permitting such petition to be filed in this Court was set aside, and the permission to file such petition was denied and same was dismissed without prejudice. The Attorney General was not a party to this suit at that time. 171 S.W.2d 856. The Attorney General has now filed a motion to reinstate the above-styled cause heretofore dismissed without prejudice.

We will *supplement our*original opinion with the following essential facts: It is shown that on March 1, 1943, Paul A. Martineau was elected Special Judge of the 94th Judicial District Court in Nueces County, to preside over that court in the place of the Honorable Allen Wood. Thereafter, on April 5, 1943, the said Paul A. Martineau was again elected Special District Judge of said court. It is further shown that he was regularly elected and qualified as such special judge as provided for in Article 1887 et seq., Revised Civil Statutes 1925.

Article 199, Serial No. 94, of Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., defines the jurisdiction and powers of the 94th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, and provides for the terms of such court in the following language: “Sec. 3. The terms of the 94th District Court shall begin on the first Mondays, respectively, in February, April, June, August, October, and December of each year, and each term may continue for eight (8) weeks.”

It appears from the record before us that the last term for which Paul A. Martineau was elected as special district judge expired in May, 1943. It also appears that the term of the 94th Judicial District Court lasts only eight weeks, and if he should be reelected it would be practically impossible for this question to be presented and determined by this Court within the limited time prescribed by the statute defining the terms of that court.

Article 6253 et seq. of the Revised Civil Statutes furnish in detail the means and method of determining if a district judge has forfeited his office. Whether such articles furnish the exclusive method for determining such question we are not called upon here to decide.

Therefore the motion of the Attorney General is overruled.
log Fish BCF = 0.83 (E)

log Fish BAF = 0.66 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk

Sorption to soils/sediments = low

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl – slow due to biodeg

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is good all routes, based on analogs; expected 

to for disulfides in the body. There is concern for irritation and possible corrosion to all tissues, 

based on disulfide formation. There is also concern for mutagenicity based on various small 

thiols. There are also concerns for blood toxicity (accelerated clotting), liver and kidney 

toxicities and neurotoxicity based on analogs. Also concern for sensitization based on the 

possibility of disulfide bond formation. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 7.1

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.74

green algal 96-h EC50 0.50

fish _ chronic value 0.86

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.083

algal _ chronic 

value

0.20

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for thiols; SAR chemical class = 

thiol; MW 134; log Kow = 1.77 (EPI); liquid with unknown mp (P); pH7; effective 

concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness 

<150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb) 

Acute 

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb) Chronic

8

SARs thiols
SAR Class thiol

New Chemcial Category Thiols

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: