alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

p0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142755 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142755 

 COA: 293233 

RUSSELL DUANE WHITE, Muskegon CC: 08-056801-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Department of Energy

Washington, DC 20585

November 25, 1998

DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS TEST PROCEDURE

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

A

On November 12, 1998, the Department published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding on test

procedures for electric distribution transformers. The Department is convening a public hearing on

January 6, 1999, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. to gather information, data, and comments regarding the

electric distribution transformers test procedures rulemaking. The hearing will be held at the

U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave, SW., Washington, D.C. 20585, in

Room 1E-245.

The Department is particularly interested in receiving comments and views of interested parties

concerning the following, but participants need not limit their statements to these topics:

® The alternative test procedures proposed;

® Adequacy of TP 2 to meet the requirements of users, such as utilities and contractors who

specify transformers for commercial and industrial applications (e.g., retail, industrial, and

office buildings);

® Distribution transformers not subject to the test procedures;

® Grouping of transformers for testing purposes, as manifested by the definition of a basic model;

and

• The sampling plan for compliance (The Department is particularly interested in discussing how

small populations should be handled.)

In addition, the less than and greater than symbols on Table 3 of the proposed rule, 63 FR 63366, were

inadvertently reversed. We expect a correction notice to be published in the Federal Register

correcting this error. Copies of the draft agenda (enclosure 1), the proposed rule (enclosure 2) and the

corrected Table 3 (enclosure 3) are provided.

Requests to speak at the hearing and written copies of statements, must be received by the Department

no later than 4:00 p.m., December 23, 1998. The Department requests that a computer diskette

(WordPerfect' 6.1) of each statement also be provided at that time. Please send ten (10) written

copies of statements and computer diskette to U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency

and Renewable Energy, EE-43, Docket No. EE-DET-97-550, Room 1J-018, 1000 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. If you have any questions, please call Ms. Kathi Epping

at (202) 586-7425. If you plan to attend the hearing, please contact Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones at

(202) 586-2945. Also, please see the section on "Public Hearing", section IV. B. under

"Supplementary Information", in the enclosed Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

Sincerely,

Michael JfMcCabe, Director

Office of Codes and Standards

Building Technology, State and

Community Programs

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Enclosures

Printed with soy Ink on recycled paper

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 12B
EXHIBIT R 

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-10 Filed 11/14/22 Page 1 of 3
GUERRA 000197

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-10 Filed 11/14/22 Page 2 of 3
GUERRA 000198

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-10 Filed 11/14/22 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.01

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Swank,  Inc.
(the  "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report"),
the undersigned  each hereby  certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with
the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934,  as  amended;  and (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: November 10,  2005              /s/ John Tulin
                                       ----------------------------
                                       John Tulin, President
                                       (Chief Executive Officer)

Dated:  November 10,  2005             /s/ Jerold R. Kassner
                                       ----------------------------
                                       Jerold R. Kassner, Senior Vice President
                                       and Treasurer
                                       (Chief Financial Officer)

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Swank, Inc. and will be retained by Swank, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5223 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5223

 To suspend temporarily the duty on hand operated globe type valves of 
 steel, having an opening less than approximately 7.62 cm. in diameter 
  and certified by the importer as meeting ASME B16.34 certification 
        requirements as approved for use in nuclear facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Mulvaney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on hand operated globe type valves of 
 steel, having an opening less than approximately 7.62 cm. in diameter 
  and certified by the importer as meeting ASME B16.34 certification 
        requirements as approved for use in nuclear facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HAND OPERATED GLOBE TYPE VALVES OF STEEL, HAVING AN OPENING 
              LESS THAN APPROXIMATELY 7.62 CM. IN DIAMETER AND 
              CERTIFIED BY THE IMPORTER AS MEETING ASME B16.34 
              CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AS APPROVED FOR USE IN NUCLEAR 
              FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Hand operated       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        globe type valves                                                  31/2015.......
                        of steel, having
                        an opening less
                        than
                        approximately
                        7.62 cm. in
                        diameter and
                        certified by the
                        importer as
                        meeting ASME
                        B16.34
                        certification
                        requirements as
                        approved for use
                        in nuclear
                        facilities
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8481.80.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Tech
Laboratories, Inc., for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2004, I, Bernard Ciongoli,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Tech Laboratories, Inc.
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
          2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended June 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Tech Laboratories, Inc.

Dated:  August 13, 2004

TECH LABORATORIES, INC.

By: /s/ Bernard Ciongoli
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
#### STEWART v. STATE.

No. 26123.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 17, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP,. Judge. •

Appellant was charged with robbery by assault, the indictment further alleging a prior conviction of an offense of like character. He was found guilty and assessed a penalty of life in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be in order and nothing is presented for review by this court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
NUMBER 13-09-00524-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JESUS ARMANDO CANO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 25th District Court

of Gonzales County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jesus Armando Cano, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having
2

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the 

18th day of February, 2010.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7744
ERIC D. HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusPAMELA ANNE SARGENT, Assistant Attorney General; NANCY P. DERRICK, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Vi rginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-537-3) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 26, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric D. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. Sargent , No. CA-95-537-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tektronix, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 25, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Colin
L. Slade, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: January 3, 2007

/s/  COLIN L. SLADE
-------------------------------------------------
Colin L. Slade
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### WHITMAN v. STATE.

No. 26207.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 28, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty.* Austin, for the State.

*394BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.00.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. All the proceedings appear regular, therefore nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### HAMPTON v. STATE.

No. 22172.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1942.

Reid & Reid, of Abilene, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Upon appellant’s plea of guilty of the offense of possessing for the purpose of sale whisky in a dry area, and the waiver of a trial by jury, the court assessed his penalty at a fine of $200.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of - exceptions. The complaint and information seem to be in proper form. All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment will be affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas S. Smith, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Silver Mines, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and we have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 14, 2009

By:    /s/ Thomas S. Smith



Thomas S. Smith, President and Director



---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the  disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel, Comparative Medicine.                    

*Date:*                         October 27, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sybil A. Wellstood, PHD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965, 301-435-0814.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 4, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-26573  Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 10.7
  SECOND AMENDMENT TO DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
  R E C I T A L S
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 A.
    
    Definitions. Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms in this Amendment shall
have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Distribution Agreement.
 B.
    
    Amendment to Section 1.3. Section 1.3 of the Distribution Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following provision:
   1




---



##### 



C.
    
    Amendment to Section 3. Section 3 of the Distribution Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following provision:
  D.
    
    Amendment to Section 8.6. Section 8.6 of the Distribution Agreement is hereby amended to
remove all references to the Distal Device in this Section.
 E.
    
    Schedule 1, Products and Prices. Schedule 1 of the Distribution Agreement, Products and
Prices, is hereby deleted and replaced with a new Schedule 1, attached hereto.
 F.
    
    Entire Agreement. Except as specifically modified or amended hereby, the Distribution
Agreement and the First Amendment to Distribution Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect and, as modified or amended, is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved. This Second
Amendment, the First Amendment and the Distribution Agreement constitute the entire and final
agreement between the Parties on the subject matter hereof and supersede any and all prior
oral or written agreements or discussions on the subject matter hereof. This Amendment and
the Distribution Agreement may not be modified in any respect except in a writing which states
the modification and is signed by both Parties hereto.
 G.
    
    Conflicts. This Amendment shall be governed by all the terms and conditions of the
Distribution Agreement. In the event of any conflict between the terms of the Distribution
Agreement and the terms of this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall control.
   2




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 COMPANY:
 CARDICA, INC.
 /s/ Bernard HausenName: Bernard HausenTitle: President and CEO
 DISTRIBUTOR:
 CENTURY MEDICAL, INC.
 /s/ Toshio KonishiName: Toshio Konishi 
Title: President & CEO
  3




---



##### 



Schedule 1
 
    
    $[*] FCA per Pas-Port, Proximal Device.
In accordance with Section 8.1 of the Distribution Agreement, as amended, this price shall be valid until June 17, 2010.
   4