alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,212
<SECURITIES>                                     4,104
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,507
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,184
<INVENTORY>                                      6,824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,583
<PP&E>                                          40,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,470
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,267
<OTHER-SE>                                         804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,434
<SALES>                                         25,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,725
<CGS>                                           15,248
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,190
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    70
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (113)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,625)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,694)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,738)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,931)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.56)


</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000888

27-MAR-2018

08:03 AM
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-23-00096-CV

__________________

JUAN ENRIQUE HURTADO, Appellant

V.

PATTI JONES, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 284th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 17-07-09255-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Juan Enrique Hurtado (Hurtado) filed a notice of appeal from an order 

directing the clerk to release funds from the registry of the trial court. 

On April 25, 2023, the District Clerk notified the Court that Hurtado had failed 

to pay or to arrange to pay for the clerk’s record in his appeal. On that same day, we 

notified the parties that the clerk’s record had not been filed and we warned Hurtado

that we would dismiss the appeal unless he arranged to pay the fee required to file 
2

the clerk’s record or he explained that he needed additional time to do so by May 

25, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On May 16, 2023, through a notice issued by the Clerk of the Court, we 

warned the parties that Hurtado had not remitted the filing fee and that unless he 

paid the fee, the Court would dismiss the appeal without further notice on any date 

after May 31, 2023. Hurtado neither paid the filing fee nor asserted that he was 

unable to afford payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 20.1. None of the parties 

responded to the Court’s notices.

In the absence of a satisfactory explanation justifying the appellant’s failure 

to pay the filing fee for the appeal or to arrange to pay for a clerk’s record to support 

his appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

37.3(b), 42.3, 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on June 28, 2023

Opinion Delivered June 29, 2023

Before Horton, Johnson and Wright, JJ.
r--- EPNF-1 I I Raw Material Sto<age (Partlaly Enclosed) EPN BP-2 I r-- EPN BP-2 I <-'< EPN EPN EPN EPN BP-3 PR-1 through PR-7 EPNCS KS-1 though KS-4 KC-1 through KC-4 I t I t t r- --r-------l

I

I I I

I I I

I I I

I I I

I I I

I I I

I I I I I 1 1 1 L ----l L ___r ___J

I I I I 1 I 1 __________I ________ -j I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I - **____j__~]** : : : : : I ,· · J -1 ·- H .:.. 1-1 **,~..**I **~**... **~**.... 1-1 **~ H~** .... **~-.1** l ___**~** EPN BP-S I I **~** L:f-J EPN PR-10, PR-11, PR-12, PR-13 I EPNCS-8 I EPNKDA&KDB I I I I I I I I -- **{~**--· -1 **~**-H -_- H- :. H **~~-·**I

EPNKSA1,KSA2, KSB1, KSB2 EPN KCA 1, KCA2, KCB1, KCB2 I I L_____J **<~ c~~** H **s~**& **P~~**I DwQ-No· Process Flow Diagram NSR Permit Amendment Application Dallas County American Marazzl Tile Inc. 208-004 208-004-8003
.-I'.-I..QJ1150...ffiflj(J)1'-ru"'"(S)UJE0LLL.-I"'""'".-Iru.-II1'-(S)I0::crEGwynethRoodnlckFrom:Sent:To:Cc:Subject:FAXto+1.202.493.2251GwynethRC>OOnickWed,06March201316:41ChrisRobinson;GwynethRoodnickScottCarmichaelFAAAD,i\l,,'"_ji'.;..·1•·rE;51[DocketNo.DirectorateIdentifier2011-NE-30-AD;Amendment39-17373;AD2013-0S-01]SBA298-77-082.1SBA298-77-0822EASAAD2012-0231FAAAD2013-QS-01Makiia1A2,N2.SensorHarness,withSNListMakila1A-1Al,N2SensorHarness,withSNlistmandatingMakila1A2andListmandatoryMakila1A2andbothlistsWeagreebothSNlistsshouldbeincludedastheFAAADdid.However,theeffectivityshouldbeMakila1(includingMakilalA,lAl,ancl1A2),notjustMakila1A2.TheN2.SensorHarness,PN0301520010isusedinterchangeablyonallMakila1engines.Kindregards,GwynethRoodnickEnginesManagerCHCHelicopterDirect:+1.604.232.7358Mobile:+1.778.999.2887gwyneth.roodnick@chc.caskype:gwyneth.roodnick.chcww....•.chc.caOf(·'Thei.--rformationcontainedmthismessageiscanfidentialandisintendedfortheaddresseecmly.Ifyounavereceivedthisinerrol'orthereareanyproblemspleasenotJfytheoriginoforimmediately.Theunauthoriseduse,disclosure,copyingorairerationofthismessageisstrictlyforbidden.
#### The State, ex rel. McDonald-Coolidge *&*Co., *v.*Curry et al., County Commrs. of Cuyahoga County, et al.

(No. 27988

Decided February 21, 1940.)

*323*Mr. Thomas M. Miller,*for relator.

*Mr. FrcmJc T. Cullitan,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Ralph W. Edwards,*for respondents.

By the Court.

The sole question raised in this proceeding is whether the power to issue additional bonds has been affected by the lapse of time intervening between the authorization by the election and the proposed issuance.

There is no constitutional time limitation and at the date when the electorate approved this bond issue the General Assembly had placed no time limit within which voted bonds could be issued.

Section 2293-23&, General Code (115 Ohio Laws, 442), effective October 4, 1933, placed a time limit upon the power to issue voted bonds and subsequent amendments of that section extended the time limit to January 1, 1941 (117 Ohio Laws, 867).

It has been stated in argument that prior to beginning the present mandamus action a taxpayer of Cuyahoga county made written demand that the prose*324cuting attorney institute an action to enjoin the commissioners from issuing and delivering the bonds on the ground that since an unreasonable length of time had elapsed between the election and the attempted exercise of power, the authority conferred by the election had become stale and the power had lapsed.

The legislative branch of the government having ex- • tended the time when voted bonds may be issued, this court cannot say that an unreasonable length of time had elapsed and that the authority conferred by the election had lapsed when exercised within the period prescribed by statute.

The demurrer to the petition will be overruled and, respondents not desiring to plead further, a writ of mandamus will be allowed.

*Writ allowed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur. i
Exhibit
      4.2

    


    


    


    


    


    February
      27, 2006

    


    Omicron
      Master Trust

    650
      Fifth
      Avenue

    24th
      Floor

    New
      York,
      New York

    USA
      10019

    Attention:         Brian
      Daly

    


    


    Dear
      Sirs:

    


    
      	
              Re:

            	
              Generex
                Biotechnology Corporation

              -
                Amendments to
                Warrants

            


    

    


    We
      make
      reference to (a) the common stock purchase warrant issued by Generex
      Biotechnology Corporation (the “Company”)
      to
      Omicron Master Trust (“Omicron”)
      on
      October 27, 2005 pursuant to which the Company granted to Omicron the
      entitlement to purchase up to 609,756 shares of the Company’s common stock at
      $1.25 per share, (b) the common stock purchase warrant issued by the Company
      to
      Omicron on October 27, 2005 pursuant to which the Company granted to Omicron
      the
      entitlement to purchase up to 304,878 shares of the Company’s common stock at
      $1.25 per share, (c) the common stock purchase warrant issued by the Company
      to
      Omicron on January 20, 2006 pursuant to which the Company granted to Omicron
      the
      entitlement to purchase up to 952,381 shares of the Company’s common stock at
      $1.05 per share, and (d) the common stock purchase warrant issued by the Company
      to Omicron on July 22, 2005 pursuant to which the Company granted to Omicron
      the
      entitlement to purchase up to 243,902 shares of the Company’s common stock at
      $0.82 per share (collectively, the “Warrants”).

    


    The
      Initial Exercise Date (as that term is defined in each of the Warrants) of
      each
      of the Warrants is expressed therein as the 181st
      day
      after the date thereof. The Company hereby confirms that, in consideration
      of
      the exercise by Omicron of not less than 100% of the Warrants and the delivery
      to the Company of Notices of Exercise in respect thereof on or before the close
      of business on February 27, 2006, the Company has agreed to abridge the Initial
      Exercise Dates and to honor the aforementioned Notices of
      Exercise.


    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    


    


    In
      addition, the Company will grant to Omicron an additional common stock purchase
      warrant pursuant to which the Company will grant to Omicron the entitlement
      to
      purchase up to 1,055,459 shares of the Company’s common stock at $3.00 per share
      exercisable for a period of five years from and after August 27,
      2006.

    


    Yours
      truly,

    


    Generex
      Biotechnology Corporation

    


    


    /s/
      Mark A. Fletcher                

    Mark
      A.
      Fletcher

    Executive
      Vice-President, General Counsel

    maf:hs
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26295]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

October 3, 2000.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before November 13, 
2000 to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1546.
    Revenue Procedure Number: Revenue Procedure 97-33.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: EFTPS (Electronic Federal Tax Payment System).
    Description: Some taxpayers are required by regulations issued 
under Sec. 6302(h) of the Internal Revenue Code to make Federal Tax 
Deposits (FTDs) using the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System 
(EFTPS). Other taxpayers may choose to voluntarily participate in 
EFTPS. EFTPS requires that a taxpayer complete an enrollment form to 
provide the information the IRS needs to properly credit the taxpayer's 
account. Revenue 97-33 provides procedures and information that will 
help taxpayers to electronically make FTDs and tax payments through 
EFTPS.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Individuals or 
households, Not-for-profit institutions, Farms, Federal Government, 
State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: 557,243.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Recordkeeper: 30 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, 
Semi-annually, Annually, Biennially.
    Estimated Total Recordkeeping Burden: 278,622 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 
5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-26295 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-226-002]

Take notice that on October 13, 2000, Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, LLC (MCGP) tendered for filing the following tariff sheets with a proposed effective date of October 1, 2000: 

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 27

Substitute Original Sheet No. 27A

Original Sheet No. 27B 

MCGP states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with an Order on Supplemental Filings issued on September 29, 2000, by the Commission in Docket No. RP00-226-001.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27336 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7243
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GUSTAV W. KLOSZEWSKI, a/k/a Jay Denmark, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:91-cr-00057; 5:92-cr-00023; 5:95-cr-00008; 5:95-cr-00021) Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 16, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gustav W. Kloszewski, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Gustav W. Kloszewski appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Kloszewski , Nos. 5:91-cr-00057; 5:92-cr-00023; 5:95-cr-00008; 5:95-cr-00021 (W.D.N.C. May 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










In connection with the Report of Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period from April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the period indicated. This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.








Dated: June 29, 2010


/s/ Kenneth K. Westbrook


Kenneth K. Westbrook


Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0729

_________________

JAMIE NORRIS,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

RICK L. OLSEN d/b/a A&O SHEET METAL,

 Defendant, Appellee and 

 Cross-Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the 

Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellee’s answer and 

cross-appeal brief filed electronically on June 19, 2023, this Court has determined that 

the brief does not comply with Rule 12 and must be supplemented as provided below.

Pursuant to M. R. App. P. 12(1)(i) and 12(4), cross-appellants must attach an

appendix that includes the relevant judgment, orders, findings of fact, conclusions of law,

jury instructions, rulings, or decisions from which the appeal is taken. Appellee’s

appendix did not contain the relevant documents. Accordingly, while the Court accepts 

filing of Appellee’s answer and cross-appeal brief, the Court requests Appellee 

electronically file the relevant document from which he appeals.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, the Appellee 

shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court the relevant judgment or order from

which the appeal is taken, and that copies of the relevant judgment or order be served on 

all parties of record; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained 

in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the relevant judgement or order.

The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to the Appellee and to all 

parties of record. Electronically signed by:

Dirk Sandefur

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 21 2023

06/21/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0729
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1455

MARIA LAURA SALINAS DE HERNANDEZ; A.J.S.H.,

Petitioners,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: January 17, 2024 Decided: February 14, 2024

Before GREGORY and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Abdoul A. Konare, KONARE LAW, Frederick, Maryland, for Petitioners. 

Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, 

Assistant Director, Joseph A. O’Connell, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1455 Doc: 27 Filed: 02/14/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Maria Laura Salinas De Hernandez and her son, natives and citizens of El Salvador, 

petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing their appeal 

from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying Salinas De Hernandez’s applications for 

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. 

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the Petitioners’ claims and conclude that the 

evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings,

see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief,

see Diaz de Gomez v. Wilkinson, 987 F.3d 359, 362 (4th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, we deny 

the petition for review.*

 In re Salinas De Hernandez (B.I.A. Apr. 10, 2023). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

* The Petitioners’ brief did not raise any issues particular to A.J.S.H. and this opinion 

has no bearing on any independent claims for relief advanced by him.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1455 Doc: 27 Filed: 02/14/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: September 15, 2010
    /s/ John R. KoelmelJohn R. Koelmel
President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: September 15, 2010
    /s/ Michael W. HarringtonMichael W. HarringtonChief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer