alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J UL I O C E S ARMOR E NO - HE R E DI A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72427 A ge nc yN o. A 079- 543- 611 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 8, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jul i o C e s arM or e no- H e r e di a , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of P e ru, pe t i t i ons pr o s e f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s thi rd mo t i o n t o r e o p e n r e mo v a lp r o c e e d i n g s . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. § 1252. W e r e vi e w f

orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the B I A ’ s de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n. 

# FI LED MA R 21 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72427 2 H e v . G on zales , 501 F . 3d 1128, 1130- 31 ( 9th C i r . 2007) . W e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng M oreno-H er edi a’ s thi rd m ot i on t o reopen as unt i m el y and nu m er i ca l l y barre d w here the m ot i on w as fi l ed n e ar lyf iv e y e ar s a f

te rth e B I A ’s f

in a l a d m in is tr a tiv e o r d e r , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 2 ) , an dM o r e n o H e r e d iaf a ile dto e s tab lis h c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s in P e ru t o qua l i f

yf orthe r e gul a t orye xc e pt i on t o the t i m e and num e r i c a l barf orf i l i ng m o tio n s to r e o p e n . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; s e e a ls o M a ltyv . A s h c r o

ft , 381 F . 3d 94 2, 94 5 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( “ T he cr i t i ca l qu es t i on i s . . . w hether c i rc um st ance s h a v e c h an g e ds u f

f ic ie n tlyth a t ap e titio n e rw h o p r e v io u s lyd idn o t h a v e ale g itim a te c la im f o ra s y lu m n o w h a s aw e ll- f o u n d e df e aro f f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n .” ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-51-000]

Take notice that on October 13, 2000, Crossroads Pipeline Company (Crossroads) tendered for filing a request for a temporary waiver for implementing the Commission's regulation at 18 CFR 284.12(c)(2)(ii) by November 1, 2000 as set forth in Order No. 587-L issued June 30, 2000 in Docket No. RM96-1-014. Order No. 587-L required interstate pipelines to file tariff sheets implementing imbalance netting and trading by November 1, 2000. Crossroads incorporated this requirement in the tariff sheets it filed on June 15, 2000 in compliance with Order No. 637 in Docket No. RP00-333-000. Therefore, Crossroads is requesting a temporary waiver of the Commission's regulation at 18 CFR 284.12(c)(2)(ii) until the effective date of the tariff sheets in Docket No. RP00-333-000.

Crossroads states that copies of this filing have been sent to Crossroad's shippers and interested state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before October 25, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27273 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Ex parte Norma BRIDGES.

No. 26291.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 4, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Judge of the 107th Judicial District Court remanding relator to the custody of the Sheriff of Cameron County for delivery to the agent of the State of Florida.

Relator has filed her affidavit to withdraw her appeal herein.

The same is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
Proposed Rule: Change to the Reporting Date for Inputsto Emission Equations under the GHG Reporting RuleMeeting Documentation: NEDA/CAP, June 9, 2011Date EPA Staff ContactInformation (Name, email,phone #)Name of Organization (Attach list of allattendees’ names and emails if possible)Summary of Discussion(e.g.,applicability, reportingrequirements, etc.)Written CommentsProvided?Did they alsosubmit to Docket?Date sent to EPACCD6/9/11Jessica GordonGordon.jessica@epa.govJennifer BohmanBohman.jennifer@epa.govBenjamin Grawe, Johnson Controls/Gonzalez Saggio Harlan LLPAl Collins, Occidental Petroleum Corp.Leslie Ritts, Ritts Law GroupMike Palazzolo, Alcoa Inc.Jeffrey J. Lettrich, Alcoa Inc.Mike Babos, Merck & Co., Inc.Steve Woock, Weyerhaeuser Co.Rob Kaufmann, Koch Company PublicSector LLCBarbara Bankoff, Eli Lilly & Co.Maxine Dewbury, Proctor & GambleDoug Deason, ExxonMobilJenna Martin, ExxonMobilLinda Farrington, Eli LillySteve Zuiss, Invista SARL- timing of the finaldeferral rule- basis for reclassifyingcertain data elements asCBI rather than inputs toemission equationsWrittencommentssubmitted toDocket EPA-HQOAR-2010-09293/7/11
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                                February 23, 2006

CONFIDENTIAL
Board of Directors
LSB Corporation

Dear Members of the Board:

I would be comfortable performing my duties as President and Chief Executive
Officer of LSB Corporation and Lawrence Savings Bank (the "Company") without the
security of an employment agreement. In light of the Boards' action on January
10, 2006, not to renew all other existing employment agreements, I think it
appropriate that we mutually agree to terminate my Employment Agreement, dated
November 1, 2005.

Following such termination, I shall continue to perform the duties of President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to your appointment, and
subject to removal by you at any time.

Until changed by you, my compensation will remain as at present. In all other
respects I will be subject to and governed by the Bank's benefits, policies and
procedures applicable to senior officers and employees generally.

If the foregoing is acceptable to the Company, kindly so indicate by signing and
dating the enclosed duplicate original copy of this letter, which shall be kept
in the permanent records and minute books of the Company to memorialize the
termination of the Employment Agreement.

Very truly yours.


/S/ GERALD T. MULLIGAN
---------------------------------------
Gerald T. Mulligan
President & Chief Executive Officer

Enclosure

Accepted and Agreed

LSB CORPORATION
LAWRENCE SAVINGS BANK


By /S/ THOMAS J. BURKE
   ----------------------------------------
   Thomas J. Burke, Chairman of the Board

Dated: February 23, 2006
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2979 

To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to preserve the 

eligibility of a child for kinship guardianship assistance payments when 

the guardian is replaced by a successor legal guardian named in the 

kinship guardianship assistance agreement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2013 

Mr. DOGGETT (for himself, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. BASS, Mr. 

LEWIS, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. MCDERMOTT, and Mr. BLUMENAUER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act 

to preserve the eligibility of a child for kinship guardianship assistance payments when the guardian is replaced 

by a successor legal guardian named in the kinship 

guardianship assistance agreement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guardians for Children 

5 Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2979 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRESERVATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR KINSHIP 

2 GUARDIANSHIP ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS 

3 WITH A SUCCESSOR GUARDIAN. 

4 Section 473(d)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 673(d)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(C) ELIGIBILITY NOT AFFECTED BY RE8 PLACEMENT OF GUARDIAN WITH A SUCCESSOR

9 GUARDIAN.—In the event of the death or inca10 pacity of the relative guardian, the eligibility of 

11 a child for a kinship guardianship assistance 

12 payment under this subsection shall not be af13 fected by reason of the replacement of the rel14 ative guardian with a successor legal guardian 

15 named in the kinship guardianship assistance 

16 agreement referred to in paragraph (1) (includ17 ing in any amendment to the agreement), not18 withstanding subparagraph (A) of this para19 graph and section 471(a)(28).’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Secretary

In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and Office of Management and Budget Circular A-63—of March 1974, and after consultation with GSA, the Secretary of Labor has determined that the renewal of the Advisory Committee on Veterans' Employment and Training is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Department by section 4110 of title 38, United States Code.

The Advisory  Committee on Veterans' Employment and Training shall: Assess the employment and training needs of veterans; determine the extent to which the programs and activities of the Department of Labor are meeting such needs; carry out such other activities that are necessary to make the recommendations required by law and, at such times as the Committee may determine, report to the Secretary of Labor on the employment and training needs of veterans.

The Committee shall consist of at least 12, but not more than 18, individuals appointed by the Secretary of Labor to serve as members of the Advisory Committee, consisting of: representatives nominated by veterans' organizations that are chartered by Federal law and have a national employment program, and not more than 6 individuals who are recognized authorities in the fields of business, employment, training,  rehabilitation, or labor and who  are not employees of the Department of Labor.

The Advisory Committee will report to the Assistant Secretary for Veterans' Employment and Training. It will function solely as an advisory body and in compliance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and its charter will be filed under the Act.

For further information contact Ms. Polin Cohanne, Chief of Staff, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Veterans' Employment and Training, U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210, telephone (202) 693-4741.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 19th day of October, 2000.

Alexis M. Herman,

Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 00-27398  Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-79-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7275

JAVAN FREDRICK MAYS, a/k/a Von Frederick Mayes,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN SCOTT LEWIS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:18-cv-03234-JFA)

Submitted: May 29, 2020 Decided: June 11, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Javan Fredrick Mays, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Javan Fredrick Mays seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2018). The magistrate judge recommended that 

relief be denied and advised Mays that failure to file timely, specific objections to this 

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the 

recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is 

necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the 

parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v. Duffy, 858 

F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 846-47 (4th Cir. 1985); 

see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154-55 (1985). Although Mays received proper 

notice and filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation, he has waived 

appellate review because the objections were not specific to the particularized legal 

recommendations made by the magistrate judge. See Martin, 858 F.3d at 245 (holding 

that, “to preserve for appeal an issue in a magistrate judge’s report, a party must object to 

the finding or recommendation on that issue with sufficient specificity so as reasonably to 

alert the district court of the true ground for the objection” (internal quotation marks 

omitted)).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 
3

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Bombay Company, Inc. quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended May 2, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000096287
<NAME> THE BOMBAY COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                           40666
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      87787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                144066
<PP&E>                                           91356
<DEPRECIATION>                                   52469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  192901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            31368
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         38129
<OTHER-SE>                                      116500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    192901
<SALES>                                          68343
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 68343
<CGS>                                            52634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    75372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (617)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6412)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2531)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3881)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3881)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,038
<SECURITIES>                                     3,770
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                       994
<INVENTORY>                                      7,160<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,972
<PP&E>                                          53,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,163
<BONDS>                                          3,898
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           53,049
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,887)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,124
<SALES>                                         28,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,994
<CGS>                                           17,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    63
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,551
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,271
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,280
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,280
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.44
<FN>
<F1>Inventory detail at August 31, 1999 was finished goods $2,605; work in process
$402; raw materials $4,153.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit
23.1








Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (File Nos. 333-43531, 333-136099, 333-129898) and Form S-3 (File No.
333-156802) and related prospectus of Community West Bancshares of our report
dated March 26, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Community West Bancshares included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008.





/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP





Los
Angeles, California


March 26,
2009







1
AMENDMENT TO PLEDGE AGREEMENT


This Amendment to Pledge Agreement, dated as of May 18, 1999, is entered into by
and between SCNV Acquisition Corp., a corporation incorporated under the laws of
the  State  of  Delaware,   (the  "Lender");   and  Elecmatec   Electro-Magnetic
Technologies  Ltd.,  a company  organized  under the laws of the State of Israel
("Pledgor").


WHEREAS: The parties have entered into a Pledge Agreement,  dated as of December
30,  1998,  a copy of  which  is  attached  hereto  as  Exhibit  A (the  "Pledge
Agreement"); and

WHEREAS: The parties wish to amend the Pledge Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1.  Section 7 of the  Pledge  Agreement  shall be deleted  in its  entirety  and
replaced with the following:

     "7. The pledge shall become void, and the Lender shall promptly execute all
documents necessary to release the pledge upon repayment of all amounts pursuant
to  the  terms  of the  Loan  Agreement  and  the  Future  Loan  Agreements  and
termination of all guarantees  made by the Lender pursuant to the Loan Agreement
and the Future Loan Agreements."

2. All other sections of the Pledge Agreement shall remain unchanged.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Pledge Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto
as of the date first above written.


Elecmatec Electro-Magnetic Technologies Ltd.     SCNV Acquisition Corp.



By: /s/ Arik El-Boher                            By: /s/ Shaul Lesin
    -------------------------                        ---------------------
Name:   Arik El-Boher                            Name:   Shaul Lesin
Title:  CEO                                      Title:   E.V.P.
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

Washington, D.C. 20549 

 

We have made a review of the condensed consolidated financial statements of Superior UniformGroup, Inc. and subsidiary (“the Company”) as of June 30, 2004 and for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, andissued our report thereon dated July 20, 2004. We are aware that such financial statements and our above-mentioned report appearing in the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 are being incorporated by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-105906, effective June 6, 2003) and that such report pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 is not considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountantor a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Paragraphs 7 and 11 of that Act. 

 

GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

Tampa, Florida 

July 20, 2004