62634 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 203 / Thursday, October 19, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

responsibilities among the various

levels of government, as specified in

Executive Order 13132, entitled

Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,

1999). Executive Order 13132 requires

EPA to develop an accountable process

to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input

by State and local officials in the

development of regulatory policies that

have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies

that have federalism implications’’ is

defined in the Executive Order to

include regulations that have

‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,

on the relationship between the national

government and the States, or on the

distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government.’’ This final rule

directly regulates growers, food

processors, food handlers and food

retailers, not States. This action does not

alter the relationships or distribution of

power and responsibilities established

by Congress in the preemption

provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4).

V. Submission to Congress and the

Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides

that before a rule may take effect, the

agency promulgating the rule must

submit a rule report, which includes a

copy of the rule, to each House of the

Congress and to the Comptroller General

of the United States. EPA will submit a

report containing this rule and other

required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives, and

the Comptroller General of the United

States prior to publication of this final

rule in the Federal Register. This final

rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by

5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Dated: October 6, 2000.

Peter Caulkins,

Acting Director, Registration Division, Office

of Pesticide Programs.

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is

amended as follows:

PART 180— [AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 180

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), (346a) and

371.

§ 180.284 [Amended]

2. In § 180.284, amend paragraph (b)

by revising the date ‘‘8/1/01’’ to read ‘‘2/

1/03.’’

[FR Doc. 00–26914 Filed 10–18–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[OPP–301070; FRL–6749–5]

RIN 2070–AB78

Tebuconazole; Extension of

Tolerances for Emergency Exemptions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This regulation extends timelimited tolerances for residues of the

fungicide tebuconazole in or on barley

grain at 2.0 parts per million (ppm),

barley hay at 20.0 ppm, barley straw at

20.0 ppm, hops at 4.0 ppm, sunflower

oil at 0.4 ppm, sunflower seed at 0.2

ppm, wheat hay at 15.0 ppm, and wheat

straw at 2.0 ppm for an additional 1-

year period. These tolerances will

expire and are revoked on December 31,

2001. This action is in response to

EPA’s granting of emergency

exemptions under section 18 of the

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and

Rodenticide Act authorizing use of the

pesticide on barley, hops, sunflowers

and wheat. Section 408(l)(6) of the

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

requires EPA to establish a time-limited

tolerance or exemption from the

requirement for a tolerance for pesticide

chemical residues in food that will

result from the use of a pesticide under

an emergency exemption granted by

EPA under section 18 of the Federal

Insecticide. Fungicide, and Rodenticide

Act.

DATES: This regulation is effective

October 19, 2000. Objections and

requests for hearings, identified by

docket control number OPP–301070,

must be received by EPA on or before

December 18, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Written objections and

hearing requests may be submitted by

mail, in person, or by courier. Please

follow the detailed instructions for each

method as provided in Unit III. of the

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. To ensure

proper receipt by EPA, your objections

and hearing requests must identify

docket control number OPP–301070 in

the subject line on the first page of your

response.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By

mail: Stephen Schaible, Registration

Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide

Programs, Environmental Protection

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC 20460; telephone

number: 703 308–9362; and e-mail

address: schaible.stephen@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

You may be affected by this action if

you are an agricultural producer, food

manufacturer, or pesticide

manufacturer. Potentially affected

categories and entities may include, but

are not limited to:

Categories NAICS

codes

Examples of potentially affected entities

Industry ... 111 Crop production.

112 Animal production.

311 Food manufacturing.

32532 Pesticide manufacturing.

This listing is not intended to be

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide

for readers regarding entities likely to be

affected by this action. Other types of

entities not listed in the table could also

be affected. The North American

Industrial Classification System

(NAICS) codes have been provided to

assist you and others in determining

whether or not this action might apply

to certain entities. If you have questions

regarding the applicability of this action

to a particular entity, consult the person

listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Additional

Information, Including Copies of this

Document and Other Related

Documents?

1. Electronically. You may obtain

electronic copies of this document, and

certain other related documents that

might be available electronically, from

the EPA Internet Home Page at http://

www.epa.gov/. To access this

document, on the Home Page select

‘‘Laws and Regulations,’’ ‘‘Regulations

and Proposed Rules,’’ and then look up

the entry for this document under the

‘‘Federal Register—Environmental

Documents.’’ You can also go directly to

the Federal Register listing at http://

www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.

2. In person. The Agency has

established an official record for this

action under docket control number

OPP–301070. The official record

consists of the documents specifically

referenced in this action, and other

information related to this action,

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 203 / Thursday, October 19, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 62635

including any information claimed as

Confidential Business Information (CBI).

This official record includes the

documents that are physically located in

the docket, as well as the documents

that are referenced in those documents.

The public version of the official record

does not include any information

claimed as CBI. The public version of

the official record, which includes

printed, paper versions of any electronic

comments submitted during an

applicable comment period is available

for inspection in the Public Information

and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB),

Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson

Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA, from 8:30

a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,

excluding legal holidays. The PIRIB

telephone number is (703) 305–5805.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

EPA issued a final rule, published in

the Federal Register of June 20, 1997

(62 FR 33550) (FRL–5725–7), which

announced that on its own initiative

under section 408 of the Federal Food,

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21

U.S.C. 346a, as amended by the Food

Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA)

(Public Law 104–170) it established

time-limited tolerances for the residues

of tebuconazole in or on barley grain at

2.0 ppm, barley hay at 20.0 ppm, barley

straw at 20.0 ppm, wheat hay at 15.0

ppm, and wheat straw at 2.0 ppm, with

an expiration date of June 30, 1998.

EPA issued a final rule, published in

the Federal Register of October 29, 1997

(62 FR 56089) (FRL–5752–4), which

announced that on its own initiative

under section 408 of the Federal Food,

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21

U.S.C. 346a, as amended by the Food

Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA)

(Public Law 104–170) it established

time-limited tolerances for the residues

of tebuconazole in or on sunflower oil

and sunflower seed at 0.4 ppm and 0.2

ppm, respectively, with an expiration

date of September 30, 1998.

EPA issued a final rule, published in

the Federal Register of December 2,

1998 (63 FR 66449) (FRL–6036–3),

which announced that on its own

initiative under section 408 of the

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

(FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a, as amended

by the Food Quality Protection Act of

1996 (FQPA) (Public Law 104–170) it

established a time-limited tolerance for

the residues of tebuconazole in or on

hops at 4.0 ppm, with an expiration date

of December 31, 2000.

EPA established these tolerances

because section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA

requires EPA to establish a time-limited

tolerance or exemption from the

requirement for a tolerance for pesticide

chemical residues in food that will

result from the use of a pesticide under

an emergency exemption granted by

EPA under section 18 of the Federal

Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide

Act (FIFRA). Such tolerances can be

established without providing notice or

period for public comment.

EPA received requests to extend the

use of tebuconazole on barley, hops,

sunflowers and wheat for this year’s

growing season due to continued nonroutine situations for growers of these

crops. Idaho, Oregon and Washington

requested emergency exemptions to

control stripe rust in barley, and Oregon

also requested the use of tebuconazole

to control stripe and leaf rust in wheat;

currently registered alternatives do not

allow application at a sufficiently late

stage of growth to control the disease.

Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota and

South Dakota requested emergency

exemptions to control Fusarium head

blight in barley and/or wheat, as the

disease continues to be a problem for

growers in those states. Buildup of rust

inoculum and continued wet and cool

weather creates a potential emergency

situation for sunflower growers in

Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska and North

Dakota. Idaho, Oregon and Washington

requested the use on hops to control

powdery mildew as it is claimed there

are no effective alternatives currently

registered. After having reviewed these

submissions, EPA concurs that

emergency conditions exist. EPA has

authorized under FIFRA section 18 the

use of tubconazole on barley, hops,

sunflowers and wheat for control of the

above pests in the states listed above.

EPA assessed the potential risks

presented by residues of tebuconazole

in or on barley, hops, sunflowers and

wheat. In doing so, EPA considered the

safety standard in FFDCA section

408(B)(2), and decided that the

necessary tolerances under FFDCA

section 408(l)(6) would be consistent

with the safety standard and with

FIFRA section 18. The data and other

relevant material have been evaluated

and discussed in the final rules of June

20, 1997; October 29, 1997; and

December 2, 1998. Based on those data

and information considered, the Agency

reaffirms that extension of the timelimited tolerances will continue to meet

the requirements of section 408(l)(6).

Therefore, the time-limited tolerances

are extended for an additional 1-year

period. EPA will publish a document in

the Federal Register to remove the

revoked tolerances from the Code of

Federal Regulations (CFR). Although

these tolerances will expire and are

revoked on December 31, 2001, under

FFDCA section 408(l)(5), residues of the

pesticide not in excess of the amounts

specified in the tolerances remaining in

or on barley grain, barley hay, barley

straw, hops, sunflower oil, sunflower

seed, wheat hay, and wheat straw after

that date will not be unlawful, provided

the pesticide is applied in a manner that

was lawful under FIFRA and the

application occurred prior to the

revocation of the tolerances. EPA will

take action to revoke these tolerances

earlier if any experience with, scientific

data on, or other relevant information

on this pesticide indicate that the

residues are not safe.

III. Objections and Hearing Requests

Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as

amended by the FQPA, any person may

file an objection to any aspect of this

regulation and may also request a

hearing on those objections. The EPA

procedural regulations which govern the

submission of objections and requests

for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.

Although the procedures in those

regulations require some modification to

reflect the amendments made to the

FFDCA by the FQPA of 1996. EPA will

continue to use those procedures, with

appropriate adjustments, until the

necessary modifications can be made.

The new section 408(g) provides

essentially the same process for persons

to ‘‘object’’ to a regulations for an

exemption from the requirement of a

tolerance issued by EPA under new

section 408(d), as was provided in the

old FFDCA sections 408 and 409.

However, the period for filing objections

is now 60 days, rather than 30 days.

A. What Do I Need to Do To File an

Objection or Request a Hearing?

You must file your objection or

request a hearing on this regulation in

accordance with the instructions

provided in this unit and in 40 CFR part

178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,

you must identify docket control

number OPP–301070 in the subject line

on the first page of your submission. All

requests must be in writing, and must be

mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk

on or before December 18, 2000.

1. Filing the request. Your objection

must specify the specific provisions in

the regulation that you object to, and the

grounds for the objections (40 CFR

178.25). If a hearing is requested, the

objections must include a statement of

the factual issue(s) on which a hearing

is requested, the requestor’s contentions

on such issues, and a summary of any

evidence relied upon by the objector (40

CFR 178.27). Information submitted in

connection with an objection or hearing

request may be claimed confidential by

marking any part or all of that

62636 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 203 / Thursday, October 19, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

information as CBI. Information so

marked will not be disclosed except in

accordance with procedures set forth in

40 CFR part 2. A copy of the

information that does not contain CBI

must be submitted for inclusion in the

public record. Information not marked

confidential may be disclosed publicly

by EPA without prior notice.

Mail your written request to: Office of

the Hearing Clerk (1900), Environmental

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. You

may also deliver your request to the

Office of the Hearing Clerk in Rm. C400,

Waterside Mall, 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, DC 20460. The Office of

the Hearing Clerk is open from 8 a.m.

to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,

excluding legal holidays. The telephone

number for the Office of the Hearing

Clerk is (202) 260–4865.

2. Tolerance fee payment. If you file

an objection or request a hearing, you

must also pay the fee prescribed by 40

CFR 180.33(i) or request a waiver of that

fee pursuant to 40 CFR 180.33(m). You

must mail the fee to: EPA Headquarters

Accounting Operations Branch, Office

of Pesticide Programs, P.O. Box

360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. Please

identify the fee submission by labeling

it ‘‘Tolerance Petition Fees.’’

EPA is authorized to waive any fee

requirement ‘‘when in the judgment of

the Administrator such a waiver or

refund is equitable and not contrary to

the purpose of this subsection.’’ For

additional information regarding the

waiver of these fees, you may contact

James Tompkins by phone at (703) 305–

5697, by e-mail at

tompkins.jim@epa.gov, or by mailing a

request for information to Mr. Tompkins

at Registration Division (7505C), Office

of Pesticide Programs, Environmental

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.

If you would like to request a waiver

of the tolerance objection fees, you must

mail your request for such a waiver to:

James Hollins, Information Resources

and Services Division (7502C), Office of

Pesticide Programs, Environmental

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.

3. Copies for the Docket. In addition

to filing an objection or hearing request

with the Hearing Clerk as described in

Unit III.A., you should also send a copy

of your request to the PIRIB for its

inclusion in the official record that is

described in Unite I.B.2. Mail your

copies, identified by docket control

number OPP–301070, to: Public

Information and Records Integrity

Branch, Information Resources and

Services Division (7502C), Office of

Pesticide Programs, Environmental

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. In

person or by courier, bring a copy to the

location of the PIRIB described in Unit

I.B.2. You may also send an electronic

copy of your request via e-mail to: oppdocket@epa.gov. Please use an ASCII

file format and avoid the use of special

characters and any form of encryption.

Copies of electronic objections and

hearing requests will also be accepted

on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 file

format or ASCII file format. Do not

include any CBI in your electronic copy.

You may also submit an electronic copy

of your request at many Federal

Depository Libraries.

B. When Will the Agency Grant a

Request for a Hearing?

A request for a hearing will be granted

if the Administrator determines that the

material submitted shows the following:

There is a genuine and substantial issue

of fact; there is a reasonable possibility

that available evidence identified by the

requestor would, if established resolve

one or more of such issues in favor of

the requestor, taking into account

uncontested claims or facts to the

contrary; and resolution of the factual

issue(s) in the manner sought by the

requestor would be adequate to justify

the action requested (40 CFR 178.32).

IV. Regulatory Assessment

Requirements

This final rule extends the expiration

date of time-limited tolerances under

FFDCA section 408. The Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) has

exempted these types of actions from

review under Executive Order 12866,

entitled Regulatory Planning and

Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993).

This final rule does not contain any

information collections subject to OMB

approval under the Paperwork

Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et

seq., or impose any enforceable duty or

contain any unfunded mandate as

described under Title II of the Unfunded

Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)

(Public Law 104–4). Nor does it require

any prior consultation as specified by

Executive Order 13084, entitled

Consultation and Coordination with

Indian Tribal Governments (63 FR

27655, May 19, 1998); special

considerations as required by Executive

Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to

Address Environmental Justice in

Minority Populations and Low-Income

Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,

1994); or require OMB review or any

Agency action under Executive Order

13045, entitled Protection of Children

from Environmental Health Risks and

Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23,

1997). This action does not involve any

technical standards that would require

Agency consideration of voluntary

consensus standards pursuant to section

12(d) of the National Technology

Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995

(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section

12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since

tolerances and exemptions that are

established on the basis of a FIFRA

section 18 petition under FFDCA

section 408, such as the tolerances in

this final rule, do not require the

issuance of a proposed rule, the

requirements of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et

seq.) do not apply. In addition, the

Agency has determined that this action

will not have a substantial direct effect

on States, on the relationship between

the national government and the States,

or on the distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government, as specified in

Executive Order 13132 entitled

Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,

1999). Executive Order 13132 requires

EPA to develop an accountable process

to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input

by State and local officials in the

development of regulatory policies that

have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies

that have federalism implications’’ is

defined in the Executive Order to

include regulations that have

‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,

on the relationship between the national

government and the States, or on the

distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government.’’ This final rule

directly regulates growers, food

processors, food handlers and food

retailers, not States. This action does not

alter the relationships or distribution of

power and responsibilities established

by Congress in the preemption

provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4).

V. Submission to Congress and the

Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides

that before a rule may take effect, the

agency promulgating the rule must

submit a rule report, which includes a

copy of the rule, to each House of the

Congress and to the Comptroller General

of the United States. EPA will submit a

report containing this rule and other

required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives, and

the Comptroller General of the United

States prior to publication of this final

rule in the Federal Register. This final

rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by

5 U.S.C. 804(2).

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 203 / Thursday, October 19, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 62637

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Dated: October 3. 2000.

James Jones,

Director, Registration Division, Office of

Pesticide Programs.

Therefore, 40 CFR Chapter I is

amended as follows:

PART 180—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 180

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), (346a) and

371.

§ 180.474 [Amended]

2. In § 180.474, the table in paragraph

(b)(1), the entries for ‘‘barley, grain’’;

‘‘barley, hay’’; ‘‘barley, straw’’; ‘‘hops’’;

‘‘sunflower oil’’; ‘‘sunflower seed’’;

‘‘wheat, hay’’; and ‘‘wheat, straw’’,

revise the ‘‘Expiration/revocation date’’,

‘‘12/31/00’’ to read ‘‘12/31/01.’’

[FR Doc. 00–26915 Filed 10–18–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M

GENERAL SERVICES

ADMINISTRATION

41 CFR Chapter 301

[FTR Amendment 94]

RIN 3090–AH28

Federal Travel Regulation; Maximum

Per Diem Rates

AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide

Policy, GSA.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

SUMMARY: This document corrects

entries listed in the prescribed

maximum per diem rates for locations

within the continental United States

(CONUS) contained in a final rule

appearing in Part IV of the Federal

Register of Friday, September 1, 2000

(65 FR 53472).

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joddy P. Garner, Office of

Governmentwide Policy (MTT),

Washington, DC 20405, telephone 202–

501–4857.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In rule

document 00–22077 beginning on page

53472 in the issue of Friday, September

1, 2000, make the following corrections:

Appendix A to Chapter 301—

[Corrected]

1. On page 53477, under the State of

Florida, city of Ocala, column two

(County and/or other defined location)

is corrected to read ‘‘Marion’’.

2. On page 53482, under the State of

New Jersey, city of Edison, column two

(County and/or other defined location)

is corrected to read ‘‘Middlesex (except

Piscataway)’’.

3. On page 53482, under the State of

New Jersey, cities of Piscataway/Belle

Mead, column two (County and/or other

defined location) is corrected to read

‘‘Somerset; and City limits of

Piscataway’’.

4. On page 53483, under the State of

New York, city of Monroe, column two

(County and/or other defined location)

is corrected to read ‘‘Orange (except

West Point)’’.

5. On page 53484, under the State of

North Carolina, city of New Bern,

column two (County and/or other

defined location) is corrected to read

‘‘City limits of New Bern’’.

6. On page 53485, under the State of

Rhode Island, a new entry is added

prior to the city of East Greenwich, to

read (column one) ‘‘Block Island’’;

(column two) ‘‘Block Island only’’;

(column three) ‘‘55’’; (column four)

‘‘30’’; (column five) ‘‘85’’.

7. On page 53485, under the State of

Rhode Island, city of Newport, column

two (County and/or other defined

location) is corrected to read ‘‘Newport

(except Block Island)’’.

8. On page 53485, under the State of

Rhode Island, city of North Kingstown,

column two (County and/or other

defined location) is corrected to read

‘‘Washington’’.

9. On page 53487, under the State of

Virginia, city of Virginia Beach, the

seasonal dates in column one are

corrected to read ‘‘(April 1–October 31)

(November 1–March 31)’’.

10. On page 53488, under the State of

Wisconsin, city of Sheboygan, column

two (County and/or other defined

location) is corrected to read

‘‘Sheboygan’’.

Pages 53477, 53482, 53483, 53484,

53485, 53487, and 53488, as corrected,

read as follows:

Appendix A to Chapter 301—

Prescribed Maximum Per Diem Rates

for CONUS

* * * * *

BILLING CODE 6820–34–P