alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GARCIA v. STATE.

No. 21891.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 21, 1942.

W. R. Parker, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Murder is the offense; the punishment, twenty-five years in the state penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts. Certain exceptions were reserved to the court’s charge, as shown by a bill of exception. In the absence of a statement of facts, such exceptions to the charge cannot be appraised.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
# Documents in Support of a Significant New Use Rule for Premanufacture Notice (PMN) P-14-0476

Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0220

# Table of Contents

1. Sanitized SAT Report for P-14-0476 2. Sanitized Engineering Report for P-14-0476 3. Sanitized Exposure Report for P-14-0476

# Sanitized SAT Report for P-14-0476POTW removal (%) = 0 Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg ≥ mo Sorption to soils/sediments = low Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 21 hrs Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 14 da Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 1.5 hr via OH radical PBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = rapid

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is moderate through the skin, absorbed through the lung and GI tract ( p che m ). There is concern for irritation/corrosion to all tissues based on Uncertain concern for developmental and neurotoxicity based on the

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 6.5 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.877 green algal 96-h EC50 0.561 fish

_ chronic value 0.255 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.082

algal

_ chronic value 0.204

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for SAR chemical class = ; log Kow = 3.1 (EPI); solid with mp unknown (P); S = 1060 mg/L (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 20

SARs SAR Class Ecotox Category

Ecotox Factors Comments:SAT Chair: Viktor Morozov

# Sanitized Engineering Report for P-14-0476

# Sanitized Exposure Report for P-14-0476
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tektronix, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 27, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Colin L. Slade, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  January 5, 2005

/s/ COLIN L. SLADE
-------------------------------------------------
Colin L. Slade
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the quarterly report of Tecumseh Products Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
James S. Nicholson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (3)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (4)  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 7, 2008                BY: /s/ JAMES S. NICHOLSON
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         James S. Nicholson
                                         Vice President, Treasurer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### ROMING v. STATE.

No. 24727.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 17, 1950.

*628H. S. Beard, Waco, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant has filed additional argument, in his motion for rehearing, on the question of the sufficiency of the evidence. Apparently he is encouraged by the statement in the original opinion that the case is not free from difficulties. This statement is correct and at the same time we do not think there is doubt as to the correctness of the conclusion reached.

When the nature of the instrument is not shown we frequently find some difficult question. Among the cases relied on by appellant for reversal are Dodd v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 26, 113 S.W.2d 540; Pleasant v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 267, 144 S.W.2d 545; and Ammann v. State, 174 Tex.Cr.R. 34, 165 S.W.2d 744.

In Dodd v. State, supra, a reversal was had because there was no evidence showing the nature of the instrument used, as limited by the court’s charge. The prosecuting witness sustained no'injuries of any character. Consequently, there was no basis for a conclusion on the two elements essential in a prosecution for assault to murder.

In Pleasant v. State, supra, we find a similar situation to that in the Dodd case. There is no evidence of the seriousness of the wound and' none as to the size of the knife involved. Even though the defendant had expressed an intention to kill, it was there held that a threat did not, under the circumstances, supply the elements necessary to be found by the jury to support a conviction for assault to, murder.

In Ammann v. State, supra, it was held that because the weapon used in committing the assault was not shown to be deadly and the wound not shown to be serious, a conviction for assault to murder could not stand, though the accused had made a threat to kill.

The evidence quoted in the original opinion distinguishes the instant case from the three cases herein discussed, and all others relied upon by appellant. The testimony of the attending physician in this case is amply sufficient to support the finding of the jury. The seriousness of the wound supports the further finding that the instrument used was sufficient to produce death and, thereby, supports the jury’s finding on the question of intention under all of the circumstances of this case. It is not necessary to restate the evidence.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
1 

### Schaeffer, John

From: Lin, Chuantung Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:00 AM To: Schaeffer, John; Boethling, Bob Cc: Lewis, Paul; Williamson, Tracy; Christian, Myrta Subject: RE: 22527-63-5 HPV 3 submissions -- M/FP BP VP W S Log P biodeg



### Hi John,

I have reviewed the submitted test data (Freezing P oint, Boiling Point, Vapor Pressure, Log P, and Wat er Solubility endpoints) for the HPV3 chemical, 22527- 63-5. All these data and test methods are adequat e and acceptable to EPA. However, it needs to be noted that the test sample used for these testings was not a 100 % pure substance. Instead, it was a mixture chemic als which contained:

1) Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3-(benzoyloxy)-2,2,4-tri methylpentyl ester [ 22527-63-5 ] (68.8 %) - This
chemical is the titled HPV3 Test substance 2) 1,3-Pentanediol, 2,2,4-trimethyl-, 1 ,3-dibenzoate [68052-23-3] (19.5 %) 3) 2,2,4-trimethyl-1 ,3-pentanediol, diisobutyrate [68 46-50-0 ] (7 %) 4) Misc. esters (4.2 %) 5) Volatiles (0.5%)

If I remembered correctly that ICB had provided com ments before on the proposed test sample (a mixture of three chemicals (#1 -#3) listed above) that the Spo nsor proposed to be used for the HPV3 Test Rule requirements for all these five endpoints. However, I am not sure whether EPA has finally agre ed and accepted on such approach (i.e. using the mixture o f the three chemicals) to fulfill the testing requi rements for this HPV 3 Test Chemical.

Please let me know if you have other question.

Thanks!

Daniel

From: Schaeffer, John
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:59 AM
To: Lin, Chuantung; Boethling, Bob Cc: Lewis, Paul Subject: 22527-63-5 HPV 3 submissions -- M/FP BP VP WS Log P biodeg

Daniel, Bob, good morning.

Attached for your respective reviews are physical-c hemical properties endpoint studies and a ready bio degradation study for the HPV3 test rule chemical Propanoic aci d, 2-methyl-, 3-(benzoyloxy)-2,2,4-trimethylpentyl ester (CASRN 22527-63-5). The submissions contain the following :

Physical Chemical Properties • Freezing Point (OECD 102) • Boiling Point (ASTM E 1719-05) • Vapor Pressure (ASTM E 1782-08)2 • Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient ( ASTM E 1147-92) • Water Solubility (40 FR 799.6784)

Environmental Fate – Ready Biodegradation • Ready Biodegradation (ISO 9408:1999(E ))

Please review these for data adequacy/acceptability by EPA. Please also let me know when we can antic ipate receiving your reviews.

Thank you.

John Schaeffer Senior Biologist USEPA/OPPT/CCD/CITB 1201 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460 Mail Code: 7405M Phone: 202-564-8173
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-130]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Earth Science Data and Information 
Systems and Services Advisory Subcommittee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Earth Systems Science 
and Applications Advisory Committee.

DATES: Monday, November 13, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; and Tuesday, 
November 14, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street SW, Room MIC 6B, Washington, 
DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Martha Maiden, Code YS, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-
1078.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--EOSDIS: What were learning and where we need to go
--ESE Data needs and Innovative Answers for Science and Applications
--SWAMP SDWG Study and Beyond
--ESE Outreach
--Digital Earth
--Data Centers of the DAAC Alliance
--Federation Report
--New DISS Status
--Points for Comment, Recommendations from Day One
--Reconvene with Technology Subcommittee for Joint Session
--Introductions and Joint Objectives
--Overview of Information Technology (IT) within the ESE Technology 
Program
--Infusion of IT into ESE Data/Information Systems
--Near Term Roadmaps and AIST Projects
--ESE Vision Era activity
--Intelligent Systems Program
--SBIR, IT Emphasis in Next Call
--Former UPN 632-- Recent IT Selections
--Software Framework requirements of HPCC/ESS Cooperative Agreement 
Notice
--Joint Committee Discussions
--ESDISSAS Reconvenes: Recommendations, Wrap-up

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: October 19, 2000.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-27315 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
1

Blythe, Andrew Philip

From: Barry Shelton <bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com>

Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 1:46 PM

To: Mark Siegmund

Subject: RE: WSOU v. Dell: Protective order

Mark, any progress on your end?

Barry

From: Barry Shelton  

Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 9:36 PM

To: Mark Siegmund <mark@waltfairpllc.com>

Subject: RE: WSOU v. Dell: Protective order

Thanks – if not, we need to tee it up for Judge Albright.  

From: Mark Siegmund <mark@waltfairpllc.com>  

Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 10:15 PM

To: Barry Shelton <bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com>

Subject: Re: WSOU v. Dell: Protective order

If only. I’ll take a look and see if I can do anything

On Jun 29, 2021, at 8:44 PM, Barry Shelton <bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com> wrote:

  

Mark,

  

I was hoping better lawyers than me were going to knock this out while I was in the Amazon trial, but

apparently no such luck. Here’s a redline and clean copy of the PO for your consideration, let me know if

you have time this week to discuss. Thanks,

  

Barry

  

Barry K. Shelton | Partner  

Shelton Coburn LLP

311 RR 620 S, Suite 205

Austin, Texas 78734‐4775

T: (512) 263‐2165 | F: (512) 263‐2166 | M: (512) 517‐9998

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com | www.sheltoncoburn.com

  

<WSOU Dell Proposed PO ‐ June 29, 2021 Proposal [CLEAN].docx>

<REDLINE ‐ Defendants' Proposed PO (6.29.21) against WSOU Compromise Proposal (6.5.21).pdf>

Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 122-2 Filed 11/19/21 Page 1 of 1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

NATURAL RESOURCES

CONSERVATION SERVICE,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-35988

D.C. No. 3:10-cv-01205-HZ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Marco A. Hernandez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 13, 2014** 

Portland, Oregon

Before: GOODWIN, IKUTA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Audubon Society of Portland (“Audubon”) appeals following the district

court’s judgment in Audubon’s action against the U.S. Natural Resources

Conservation Service, assigning error to the order awarding Audubon attorneys’

FILED

MAY 19 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
fees. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of

discretion. See Barjon v. Dalton, 132 F.3d 496, 500 (9th Cir. 1997). We affirm.

The district court’s award of attorneys’ fees was not an abuse of discretion. 

Courts calculate attorneys’ fees according to the prevailing market rates in the

relevant community. See id. “Generally, the relevant community is the forum in

which the district court sits.” Id. Although the district court is located in Portland,

Oregon, its jurisdiction includes the entire state of Oregon. Because Audubon did

not provide satisfactory evidence showing that Portland was the appropriate

community for purposes of establishing its attorneys’ hourly rates, the district court

did not abuse its discretion by applying Oregon statewide rates.

AFFIRMED. 

2
**Exhibit 15**

Superior Uniform Group, Inc. 

10055 Seminole Boulevard 

Seminole, Florida 33772 

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), theunaudited interim financial information of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, as indicated in our report dated July 23, 2009; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed noopinion on that information. 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2009 is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-105906, effective June 6, 2003). 

We also areaware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Tampa, Florida 

July 23, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2763 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2763

 To reauthorize appropriations for the National Women's Rights History 
                              Project Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2013

   Ms. Slaughter (for herself, Mr. Reed, Mr. Maffei, and Mr. Hanna) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize appropriations for the National Women's Rights History 
                              Project Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) Votes for Women's Trail.--Section 1602 of Title XVI of Public 
Law 96-607 (16 U.S.C. 410 ll-1) is amended in subsection (f)(2) by 
striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2018''.
    (b) National Women's Rights History Project Registry and the 
National Women's Rights History Project Partnership Network.--Section 
7111 of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-
11) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(5) by striking ``2013'' and inserting 
        ``2018''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(4) by striking ``2013'' and inserting 
        ``2018''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-47-000]

Take notice that on October 13, 2000, Viking Gas Transmission Company (Viking), tendered for filing a request for exemption from Order No. 587-L, Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, FERC Regulations, Preambles 31,100 (2000) in compliance with the Commission's September 28, 2000 “Order Granting Clarification” issued in Docket No. RM96-1-016.

Viking states that copies of this filing have been served on all Viking's jurisdictional customers and to affect state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before October 25, 2000 considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27272 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust-Series A
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<CIK>               1051822
<NAME>              World Monitor Trust-Series A

<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1999

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          26,587,416

<SECURITIES>                    924,338

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                27,511,754

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  27,511,754

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,528,165

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      24,983,589

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    27,511,754

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                (3,514,892)

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,696,568

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (5,211,460)

<EPS-BASIC>                   (27.31)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Qiao Xing Universal Telephone,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Calvin Chong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ CALVIN CHONG       
| |  |                        
| |  | Calvin Chong           
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | July 31, 2003