alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

Mr. Jurgen von Heyden                            SCHADE GmbH & Co. KG
Am Buschhauschen
42115 Wuppertal
Germany

                                                           November 26, 1997

YOUR RETIREMENT PENSION

Dear Mr. Von Heyden,

In our letter dated 15 July 1997, we informed you of our agreement to provide a
company retirement pension for you. With regard to the indexation of pensions,
pension entitlements in the event of invalidity and a widow's/orphan's pension,
this commitment shall be amended as follows:

1. INDEXATION OF ONGOING PENSION PAYMENTS

Ongoing pension payments shall be examined every three years. As a rule,
payments shall be adjusted to reflect the rise in the cost-of-living index over
the same period of time.

2. BENEFITS IN THE EVENT OF INVALIDITY (THROUGH NO FAULT OF ONE'S OWN)

Pensions shall also be paid in the case of invalidity (where this was caused
through no fault of the individual in question). In the case of occupational
disability, the invalidity pension shall correspond to the level of pension
payment. In the case of partial invalidity (50% and over), a percentage of the
pension shall be paid depending on the degree of invalidity at issue. Income
received other than invalidity pension may be taken into account. In cases where
invalidity is brought about by a third party, all claims for compensation must
be assigned to Schade before a pension can be granted on the grounds of
invalidity.

3. WIDOW'S AND ORPHAN'S PENSION

Widow's and /or orphan's pensions shall be granted on condition that the
deceased had, at the time of his/her death, a non-forfeitable pension
entitlement and that the following conditions are met:

1. CONDITIONS FOR WIDOW'S PENSION:

-That the widow/widower co-habited with the deceased at the time of his/her
death

-That the widow/widower is no more that 15 years younger than the deceased

-That the marriage existed for at least five years during the time in which the
deceased was in the employ of the company in question.

-That the marriage was contracted before the 60th birthday of the deceased

-That the widow/widower did not remarry

<PAGE>

2. CONDITION'S FOR ORPHAN'S PENSION

-That the child/children are not provided for (e.g. at school/university, etc)
and

-That the child/children who are not provided for are not older than 25 years

The widow's pension shall amount to 60% of the non-forfeitable pension
entitlement, the orphan's pension to 10% of the entitlement if the child has
still one remaining parent and 20% if the child has no remaining parents. The
sum total of the widow's and orphan's pension shall not exceed the total of the
non-forfeitable pension entitlement.

We hope that we have succeeded in clarifying all issues relating to your
retirement pension.

Best Regards

/s/ Dr. Iber-Schade      /s/ H. Hammerstein       /s/ Dr. Heyn
-------------------      ------------------       ------------
Dr. Iber-Schade          H. Hammerstein           Dr. Heyn


/s/ Jurgen von Heyden
---------------------
Jurgen von Heyden
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5609 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5609

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electric wine bottle 
                                openers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Ellison introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electric wine bottle 
                                openers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ELECTRIC WINE BOTTLE OPENERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Electric wine       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          bottle openers                                                    12/31/2015
                          incorporating a
                          rechargeable
                          battery (provided
                          for in subheading
                          8509.80).........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27198]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Advisory Group on Electron Devices, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group A (Microwave Devices) of the DoD Advisory Group 
on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Wednesday, December 13, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, Inc. 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 
22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Cox, AGED Secretariat, 1745 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 
22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced 
Research Projects Agency (ARPA) and the Military Departments in 
planning and managing an effective and economical research and 
development program in the area of electron devices.
    The Working Group A meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development programs which the Military Departments propose to 
initiate with industry, universities or in their laboratories. This 
microwave device area includes programs on developments and research 
related to microwave tubes, solid state microwave devices, electronic 
warfare devices, millimeter wave devices, and passive devices. The 
review will include details of classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. Sec. 10(d) (1994)), it has been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) 
(1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the 
public.

    Dated: October 17, 2000.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-27198 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3098 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to enhance the treatment of certain 

small business concerns for purposes of Department of Veterans Affairs 

contracting goals and preferences. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 

Mr. MCNERNEY (for himself, Mr. GARAMENDI, and Ms. BROWN of Florida) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to enhance the 

treatment of certain small business concerns for purposes 

of Department of Veterans Affairs contracting goals and 

preferences. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service Disabled Vet5 eran Owned Small Business Relief Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3098 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF TREATMENT UNDER CON2 TRACTING GOALS AND PREFERENCES OF DE3 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8127(h) of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘rated as’’ 

7 and all that follows through ‘‘disability.’’ and insert8 ing a period; and 

9 (2) in paragraph (2), by amending subpara10 graph (C) to read as follows: 

11 ‘‘(C) The date that— 

12 ‘‘(i) in the case of a surviving spouse of a 

13 veteran with a service-connected disability rated 

14 as 100 percent disabling or who dies as a result 

15 of a service-connected disability, is 10 years 

16 after the date of the veteran’s death; or 

17 ‘‘(ii) in the case of a surviving spouse of a 

18 veteran with a service-connected disability rated 

19 as less than 100 percent disabling who does not 

20 die as a result of a service-connected disability, 

21 is three years after the date of the veteran’s 

22 death.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

24 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 180 

25 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3098 IH

1 apply with respect to contracts awarded on or after such 

2 date. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### FANTHAM et al. v. GOODRICH et al.

No. A-3209.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 28, 1951.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1952.

*511William C. Perry, Jr., and Butler, Binion, Rice & ’Cook, all of Houston, for petitioners.

Bell, Dyche & Bell, Hirsch & Westheimer, Bennett Lay, Edgar Bottler, Carl & Lee and Frank Heard, Jr., Houston, for respondents.

GRIFFIN Justice.

The facts of this case and the prior disposition thereof are fully set out by the Court of Civil Appeals in its opinion found in 238 S.W.2d 572.

From an examination of the record herein it is apparent to us that the trial court disposed of this cause upon the theory that the deeds in question were not ambiguous, and that he did not consider the evidence introduced on the trial as to the facts and circumstances surrounding the parties at the time of the execution of the deeds and showing the actions and conduct of the parties. In our opinion, the deeds on their faces are ambiguous and parol evidence is properly admitted to show the facts and circumstances surrounding the parties and the execution of the deeds.

The evidence which was introduced and on which the trial court made no findings, and which the trial court refused to consider in rendering his judgment was conflicting and raised controverted issues of fact. This court cannot resolve such conflicts and they must be resolved by a jury or by the trial court. We are not holding all of the evidence heard by the trial court was admissible, and he can rule on admissibility of that offered on another trial in accordance with law governing admission Of testimony to explain ambiguous instruments.

Therefore, it becomes necessary to reverse the judgments of both courts below and remand this cause to the proper district court of Harris County for a trial consistent with our view as herein expressed.
June 9, 2015

Kenneth Shelton Ken Shelton Photography

7546 Trillium Blvd. Sarasota, FL 34241

Dear Mr. Shelton:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 26, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Ken Shelton Photography into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0791), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### W. E. BUTLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 23572.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1946.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant’s motion to withdraw the appeal is granted and the clerk is directed to so certify.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                               J. CREW GROUP, INC.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                       Name Under Which
Name of Subsidiary                  State of Incorporation             Subsidiary Does Business
------------------                  ----------------------             ------------------------
<S>                                 <C>                                <C>
J. Crew Operating Corp.             Delaware                           J. Crew Operating Corp.
J. Crew Inc.                        New Jersey                         J. Crew Inc.
Clifford & Wills, Inc.              New Jersey                         Clifford & Wills, Inc.
Grace Holmes, Inc.                  Delaware                           (J. Crew Retail Stores)
H. F. D. No. 55, Inc.               Delaware                           (J. Crew Factory Stores)
C & W Outlet, Inc.                  New York                           C & W Outlet, Inc.
J. Crew International, Inc.         Delaware                           J. Crew International, Inc.
J. Crew Services, Inc.              Delaware                           J. Crew Services, Inc.
J. Crew Virginia, Inc.              Virginia                           J. Crew Virginia, Inc.
</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3087 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the receipt of bonuses 

by Department of Veterans Affairs employees who violate Federal civil 

laws or regulations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 

Mr. ROE of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the receipt of bonuses by Department of Veterans Affairs employees who violate Federal civil laws or regulations, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Affairs Em5 ployee Accountability Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3087 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON BONUSES FOR DEPARTMENT OF 

2 VETERANS AFFAIRS EMPLOYEES WHO VIO3 LATE FEDERAL CIVIL LAWS OR REGULA4 TIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new section: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 713. LIMITATION ON BONUSES. 

9 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—(1) The Secretary shall ensure 

10 that no employee of the Department who, during any year, 

11 knowingly violates any law, regulation, or policy described 

12 in paragraph (2) receives a bonus for or during that year. 

13 ‘‘(2) A law, regulation, or policy described in this 

14 paragraph is any of the following: 

15 ‘‘(A) A Federal civil law or Federal regulation, 

16 including such civil laws or regulations covered 

17 under the Federal Acquisition Regulation and the 

18 Veterans Affairs Acquisition Regulation. 

19 ‘‘(B) An internal policy of the Department. 

20 ‘‘(b) CERTIFICATION.—The Secretary shall annually 

21 certify to Congress that each bonus awarded by the Sec22 retary during the previous year was awarded in accord23 ance with subsection (a)(1). 

24 ‘‘(c) BONUS DEFINED.—For purposes of this section, 

25 the term ‘bonus’ includes— 

26 ‘‘(1) a retention incentive; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3087 IH

1 ‘‘(2) a retention incentive payment; 

2 ‘‘(3) a retention incentive award; and 

3 ‘‘(4) any other incentive requiring approval 

4 from the Central Office Human Resource Service, 

5 the Chief Business Office Workforce Management, 

6 or the Corporate Senior Executive Management Of7 fice.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

9 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following new item: 

‘‘713. Limitation on bonuses’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of J.Crew Group, Inc., J. Crew Intermediate LLC and J.Crew Operating Corp. (collectively, the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ended January 31, 2004 (the "Report"), Millard S. Drexler and Nicholas Lamberti, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, each certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

Dated:
April 29, 2004

|/s/MILLARD S. DREXLERMillard S. Drexler
Chief Executive Officer     
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/NICHOLAS LAMBERTINicholas Lamberti
Acting Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*ISSAC COUNCIL

*Donald D. Dakers,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Bruce R. Lockwood,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided July 2, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 919 (AC 17281), is denied.
#### William Earl MALONE v. STATE.

No. 26089.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 16, 1952.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was found guilty of assault with intent to murder. His punishment was assessed at ten years in the penitentiary.

The transcript contains appellant’s motion to withdraw the appeal. The request is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40893 Summary Calendar

__________________ JOE RICHARD RANDLE, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus SALLY CANNON, CO. III, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:94-CV-525
- - - - - - - - - - February 23, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Joe Richard Randle, Jr., appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court dismissed his action for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). This dismissal was an abuse of discretion as Randle had not engaged in any delay or contumacious conduct. McNeal v. Papasan , 842 F.2d 787, 790 (5th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, the dismissal is VACATED and the case REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         251,458                       0
<SECURITIES>                                   169,306                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  322,303                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               824,650                       0
<PP&E>                                          17,343                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,863,586                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          442,505                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,989                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,246,705                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,863,586                       0
<SALES>                                      2,991,801               2,887,049
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,991,801               2,887,049
<CGS>                                        2,501,273               2,370,711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,501,273               2,370,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                490,528                 516,338
<INCOME-TAX>                                   205,000                 166,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            285,528                 350,338
<DISCONTINUED>                                  51,459                  54,643
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   336,987                 404,981
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17                    0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                    0.18
        

</TABLE>