alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 00-70]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 00-70 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 60629)          ( print page 60630)          ( print page 60631)          ( print page 60632)    
 

 

 

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[FR Doc. 00-26171 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              14
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         45
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,401
<PP&E>                                           4,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,363
<BONDS>                                            984
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,295
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,383
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    106
<INCOME-TAX>                                        41
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 65
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        65
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR
ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50728

Summary Calendar

 

IRA “JIM” M. HOMEWOOD ET AL.,

 Plaintiffs,

IRA “JIM” M. HOMEWOOD; RUFUS L. HUDGINS;

CLETON SHANNON, JR.; DAVID T. LEVAN;

KIM L. HILL; CARLOS JUAREZ; CAROLYN CURNOW,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

TEXAS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, INC.,

doing business as Gary Job Corps,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-96-CV-569

- - - - - - - - - -

May 25, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Plaintiffs appeals the summary judgment dismissal of

their claims brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named

Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The

Plaintiffs argue that the district court erred in determining
No. 97-50728

-2-

that Texas Educational Foundation, Inc., was not a state actor. 

Inasmuch as plaintiff Juarez does not challenge the district

court’s decision with regard to his Title VII claims, they are

waived. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813

F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs and

AFFIRM the district court’s judgment for essentially the same

reasons set forth by the district court. Homewood et al. v.

Texas Educational Foundation, Inc., A 96-CA-569 SS (W.D. Tex.

July 23, 1997). 

 AFFIRMED.
## INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS CMRTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS NOV 182015 THE STATE OF TEXAS, § *._..' 

### AbelAcosta,Clerk VS. § APPEAL NO. 01-15-00096-CR 

### JAMES WILLS BEN, § FILEDIN 

## APPELLANT'SFTRSTMOYIONFORASIXTYDAYEXTENSIONo$°TI^OFCR!M,NALAPPEALS TOFILEHIS PETTnOlFORDISCRETIONARYREVIEW ' fcOV 182ii.J TO THE HONORABLEJUSTICES OF SAID COURT: AbelAcosta C|er!< GOMES NOW, JAMES WILLS BEN, Appellant herein now proceeding pro se and in support of this motion will show this Honorable Court the following:
I. The Honorable First District Court of Appeals rendered its opinion in this 

### case on October 22, 2015. Therefore, Appellant's PDR is presently due to be filed
on orbefore November 21, 2015. Appellant had been represented by court 

### appointed attorney, Thomas A. Martin. His representation'was concluded with the court issuing there opinion. Applicant has no formal.training in the law, in fact hehas a below average 10. At this time Appellant is on aunit that has no 

### ground floor access":o the law library. Appellant is forced to use a cane to walk with and wear special medical shoes, as such he can not climb stairs. The law library on this unit is on the second floor to obtain access a 

### prisoner must climb the stairs. Therefore, Appellant's ability to conduct reseaech is severally limited at its best. The Doctor on this unit just last 

### recommended Appellant to be transferred to aground floor unit. Appellant needs this extra time to do research so he can file a well researched and well written 

### PDR. If this motion is granted Appellant's brief will be due to be filed on or before December 21. 2015.WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this Honorable Court 

### grant this motion for. a sixty day extension of time thereby making Appellant's PDR due to be filed on or before December 21, 2015.
Respectfully submitted,

James Wills Ben #543889 Wayne Scott Unit 6999 Retrieve Rd Angleton, Texas 77515

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, .hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this motion has been sent to the Crimina]. District Attorney addressed to: Devon Anderson, 1201 Franklin, Suite 600, Houston, Texas 77002, byplacing a true and correct copy in the 

### U.S. Mail postage prepaid on this 7iuk day of November, 2015.

James Wills Ben
#### HOLDRIDGE v. STATE.

No. 21865.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 21, 1942.

Williamson & Nordyke, of Stephenville, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of unlawfully carrying a pistol. The punishment assessed is a fine of $100.

Appellant’s only complaint is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction, but he has failed to present to this court a statement of the facts adduced at the trial, in the absence of which we cannot determine the question presented by him.

Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of .the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
EX-4.5
       ADDENDUM TO CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE AND WARRANT TO PURCHASE
                              COMMON STOCK

                    ADDENDUM TO CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE
                   AND WARRANT TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK

This Addendum to Convertible Debenture and Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock ("Addendum") is entered into as of the 27th day of January 2006
by and between RMD Technologies, Inc., a California corporation
("RMD"), and La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc., a California corporation
("LJCI").

WHEREAS, LJCI and RMD are parties to that certain 7 _ % Convertible
Debenture dated as of January 27, 2006 ("Debenture"); and

WHEREAS, LJCI and RMD are parties to that certain Warrant to Purchase
Common Stock dated as of January 27, 2006 ("Warrant"); and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Debenture and Warrant in
certain respects.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Blue and GGI
agree as follows:

1.  All terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have
the definitions set forth in the Debenture or the Warrant.

2.  The second sentence of section 3.1(a) of the Debenture is amended
to read as follows: "The number of shares into which this
Debenture may be converted is equal to the dollar amount of the
Debenture being converted multiplied by 110, minus the product of
the Conversion Price multiplied by 100 times the dollar amount of
the Debenture being converted, and the entire foregoing result
shall be divided by the Conversion Price."

3.  The Exercise Price of the Warrant shall be $1.09. The Warrant
shall be exercised in an amount equal to 100 times the amount of
the Debenture being converted.

4.  Except as specifically amended herein, all other terms and
conditions of the Debenture and Warrant shall remain in full
force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, RMD and LJCI have caused this Addendum to be
signed by its duly authorized officers on the date first set forth above.

RMD Technologies, Inc.                 La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc.


By: /s/  Patrick A. Galliher           By: /s/  Travis W. Huff
Patrick A. Galliher                    Travis W. Huff
Title: President                       Title: Portfolio Manager
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,006
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                       319
<INVENTORY>                                      5,982
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,501
<PP&E>                                          13,134
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,804
<BONDS>                                          7,617
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,147
<SALES>                                         50,004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,004
<CGS>                                           20,710
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,489
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,815
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,298
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,298
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
        

</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3105 

To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to exempt from such Act 

animals accidentally included in shipments of aquatic species produced 

in commercial aquaculture, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 

Mr. CRAWFORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to exempt 

from such Act animals accidentally included in shipments 

of aquatic species produced in commercial aquaculture, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aquaculture Risk Re5 duction Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3105 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM LACEY ACT OF ANIMALS INAD2 VERTENTLY INCLUDED IN SHIPMENTS BY 

3 COMMERCIAL FISH FARMERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2 of the Lacey Act 

5 Amendments of 1981 (16 U.S.C. 3371) is amended in 

6 paragraph (a)— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘The term’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

8 Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term’’; 

9 and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(B) Such term does not include any animal ac12 cidentally included in a shipment of an aquatic spe13 cies produced in commercial aquaculture for human 

14 consumption or for use for recreational or orna15 mental purposes.’’. 

16 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub17 section (a) shall apply beginning on the date of the 

18 issuance of final regulations under subsection (c). 

19 (c) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 90 days after the 

20 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 

21 Interior, acting through the United States Fish and Wild22 life Service, shall issue regulations implementing the 

23 amendment made by subsection (a). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                               CERTIFICATE OF CEO

      I, Dwight B. Grizzell, Chief Executive Officer of Mountain National
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1)   the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant, to which this
      certificate is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.


Dated: March 30, 2004                /s/ Dwight B. Grizzell
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Dwight B. Grizzell, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26735]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE


Notice of Public Meeting

DATE: Friday, November 10, 2000, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

PLACE: La Costa Hotel, Carlsbad, CA.

Matters to be Considered: Consideration of proposals submitted for 
Institute funding and internal Institute business.

Portions Open to the Public: Consideration of proposals submitted for 
Institute funding.

Portions Closed to the Public: Discussion of internal personnel 
matters.

Contact Person: David Tevelin, Executive Director, State Justice 
Institute, 1650 King Street, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22314, (703) 
684-6100.

David I. Tevelin,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 00-26735 Filed 10-13-00; 2:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-SC-M
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3096 

AN ACT 

To designate the building occupied by the Federal Bureau 

of Investigation located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, as the ‘‘Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening 

Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3096 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The building occupied by the Federal Bureau of In3 vestigation located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, 

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Michael D. Resnick 

5 Terrorist Screening Center’’ during the period in which 

6 the building is occupied by the Federal Bureau of Inves7 tigation. 

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

9 During the period in which the building referred to 

10 in section 1 is occupied by the Federal Bureau of Inves11 tigation, any reference in a law, map, regulation, docu12 ment, paper, or other record of the United States to that 

13 building shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Michael 

14 D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3096 

AN ACT 

To designate the building occupied by the Federal 

Resnick Terrorist Screening Center’’. Lane, Vienna, Virginia, as the ‘‘Michael D. Bureau of Investigation located at 801 Follin
Order entered July 31 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 00122 - CV ADDISON URBAN DEVELO PMENT PARTNERS, LLC, Appellant V. ALAN RITCHEY MATERIA LS COMPANY, LC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 10 - 03902 - C 

### O RDER We GRANT appellee’s July 15, 2013 unopposed motion for leave to file a sur

- reply brief. We ORDER the sur

- reply brief attached to appellee’s motion filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ C AROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,273-01

EX PARTE BILLY WAYNE MARCY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR01988-HC-1 IN THE 6th DISTRICT COURT

FROM RED RIVER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of evading arrest

and sentenced to two years’ in state jail. 

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed

to timely file a notice of appeal. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte
2

Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. 

As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is

the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order counsel to respond to

Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

was denied his right to a meaningful appeal because Applicant’s counsel failed to timely file a notice

of appeal. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it

deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: November 19, 2014

Do not publish
exv10w49



 









Exhibit 10.49




Adjustments to Senior Executive Officer Salaries



On December 13, 2005, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
Applied Materials, Inc. (“Applied”) approved the annual base salaries for Applied’s senior executive
officers. The indicated salaries are effective December 19, 2005. The salaries for Franz Janker,
Nancy H. Handel and Farhad Moghadam have increased from the prior level; the salaries for Michael
R. Splinter, Mark R. Pinto and Thomas St. Dennis have not changed. The salaries are as follows:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Executive Officer	 	Salary
	Michael R. Splinter
	 	$	945,000	 
	Franz Janker
	 	$	500,000	 
	Nancy H. Handel
	 	$	440,000	 
	Farhad Moghadam
	 	$	475,000	 
	Mark R. Pinto
	 	$	416,160	 
	Thomas St. Dennis
	 	$	450,000