alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31188 Summary Calendar

PAUL GARDEN,
Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-399

- - - - - - - - - - April 28, 1998 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Paul Garden appeals the district court’s order dismissing for

lack of jurisdiction his petition for review of the BIA’s decision

dismissing his appeal of his deportation order. Garden argues

that his petition was a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 federal habeas petition

over which the district court had jurisdiction. Because Garden’s

petition sought review of the BIA’s decision and a stay of the

deportation order, the district court did not err in dismissing the

petition for lack of jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a. Garden’s

motion for extraordinary relief is DENIED.No. -2-

AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF DENIED.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- ) ) Technologists Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W917PM-07-D-0016 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59011

Ms. Badria Azimi

Operations Director.

and Corporate Officer Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney James D. Stephens, Esq.

Assistant District Counsel U.S. Army Engineer District, Middle East Winchester, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 8April 2014

# ~~# Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59011, Appeal ofTechnologists Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      In connection with the quarterly report of Tecumseh Products Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Todd
W. Herrick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:   April 30, 2004                     BY:    /s/  TODD W. HERRICK
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Todd W. Herrick
                                                   Chairman, President and Chief
                                                   Executive Officer
exv10w50



 






Exhibit 10.50




Compensation of Non-Employee Directors



On December 13, 2005, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors (the “Board”) of Applied Materials, Inc. approved changes to the cash compensation to
be paid to certain non-employee members of the Board who serve as the Chairs of certain of the
Board’s standing Committees. The changes are effective for fiscal year 2006. The annual retainer
for the Chair of the Audit Committee will be $35,000. The annual retainer for the Chair of the
Human Resources and Compensation Committee will be $30,000. The annual retainer for the Chair of
the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will be $25,000. If a director holds more than
one chair, he or she will receive only the single retainer payable for the highest paying position
held but will not receive a retainer for any other chair. The retainer amounts indicated include
the retainer otherwise payable to the individual for serving as a member of the Board.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Dennis OBrien, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Silver Mines, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-a5(f)) for the Registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within this entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 13, 2010

By:    /s/ Dennis OBrien



Dennis OBrien, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 200 (Monday, October 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61210]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26495]



[[Page 61210]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Publice Notice No. 3435]


Shipping Coordinating Committee, Subcommittee on Ship Design and 
Equipment; Meeting Notice

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee will conduct an open meeting at 
9:30 am on Thursday, November 16, 2000, in Room 6319, at U.S. Coast 
Guard Headquarters, 2100 2nd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001. 
The purpose of the meeting is to prepare for the forty-fourth session 
of the Subcommittee on Ship Design and Equipment of the International 
Maritime Organization (IMO) which is scheduled for March 5-9, 2001, at 
IMO Headquarters in London, England.
    Among other things, items of particular interest are: revision of 
resolutions MEPC.60(33) and A.586(14) regarding pollution prevention 
equipment; asbestos-related problems on board ships; casualty analysis; 
development of guidelines for ships operating in ice-covered waters; 
low-powered radio homing devices for liferafts on ro-ro passenger 
ships; use of desalinators on liferafts and lifeboats; improved thermal 
protection; amendments to resolution A.744(18) regarding guidelines on 
the enhanced program of inspections during surveys of bulk carriers and 
oil tankers; revision of the Interim Standards for ship 
maneuverability; and guidelines under Annex VI of the International 
Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL).
    IMO works to develop international agreements, guidelines, and 
standards for the marine industry. In most cases, these form the basis 
for class society rules and national standards/regulations. Such an 
open meeting supports the U.S. Representative to the IMO Subcommittee 
in developing the U.S. position on those issues raised at the IMO 
Subcommittee meetings. This open meeting serves as an excellent forum 
for the public to express their ideas and participate in the 
international rulemaking process. All members of the public are 
encouraged to attend or send representatives to participate in the 
development of U.S. positions on those issues affecting your maritime 
industry and remain abreast of all activities ongoing within the IMO.
    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing: Mr. Wayne Lundy, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, Commandant (G-
MSE-3), 2100 2nd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling: 
(202) 267-2206.

    Dated: October 10, 2000.
Stephen Miller,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee.
[FR Doc. 00-26495 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-U
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

          - [516 DM 1-15]

# AGENCY:

Department of the Interior.

# ACTION:

Extension of time. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice is for the sole purpose of granting the public an extension of time to review our August 28, 2000, publication of the above named procedures. The publication appears at 65 FR 52211-52241. The Department of the Interior will now accept comments from the public through close of business on November 13, 2000.

Willie R. Taylor,

Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance.

[FR Doc. 00-26998  Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-RG-M
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1376

_____________________________

K.O., A Child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Suzanne Bass, Judge.

December 12, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### McCLUSKEY v. McGREGOR.

No. 2660.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Feb. 13, 1948.

. Marshall, King & Rodgers, of Graham, for appellant.

Brooks, Duke & Templeton, of Abilene, for appellee.

LONG, Justice.

McGregor sued McCluskey for damages growing out of an automobile collision in the City of Abilene. McCluskey filed a plea of privilege to be sued in Young County, where he resides. McGregor controverted such plea and sought to hold venue in Taylor County under Subdivision 9 of Article 1995 of Revised Civil Statutes on the ground, among others, that McCluskey was operating his automobile at the time of the' collision while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Upon a hearing before the court without a jury, the plea of privilege was overruled. McCluskey has appealed.

’McCluskey contends that there is, as a matter of law, no evidence to sustain the •court’s judgment overruling the plea of privilege. We do not agree with this contention. McGregor, with his wife and son nine years of age, had stopped in his automobile at about 8:00 o’clock on the evening of September 12, 194-6, at a stop light at the intersection of Sayles Boulevard and South First Street in the City' of Abilene. The traffic on that occasion at that place was very heavy. McCluskey,. with two companions, was travelling west on South First Street about thirty miles per hour on his way to a ball game. McCluskey was driving the car. Without any apparent excuse, McCluskey drove his car into the rear of McGregor’s car and as a result thereof, the car was badly damaged and McGregor received a serious injury to his arm at the left elbow. It is undisputed that McCluskey had been drinking 'intoxicating liquor that afternoon. Immediately after the collision, he walked over to Mc-Gregor’s car and said to McGregor’s wife, “Darling, are you hurt?”

McCluskey was detained by the City Police at the City Hall for some three hours after the collision.' No complaint was filed against him. However, it is our view that the trial court was justified in finding from the facts and circumstances in evidence that McCluskey at the time of the collision was driving his automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, in violation of Art. 802/ P.C. Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 802, and that same was a proximate cause of the collision in question and Me-*689Gregor’s damages resulting . therefrom. The trial court did not err in overruling the plea of privilege.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

July 18, 2001


Board of Directors
Superior Uniform Group, Inc.
Seminole, Florida

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. and subsidiary for the periods ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000, as indicated in our report dated July 16, 2001; because
we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 2-85796 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.




/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP

Certified Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
Order entered January 12 , 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 01233
- CV
DALLAS POLICE AND FI RE PENSION SYSTEM, Appellant
V. MIKE RAWLINGS, SCOTT GRIGGS, ADAM M EDRANO, CASEY THOMAS , II, CAROLYN KING ARNOLD, RICKEY D. CALLAHAN, MONICA R. ALONZO, TIFFINNI YOUNG, ERIK WILSON, MARK CLAYTON , ADAM MCGOUGH, LEE KLEINMAN, SANDY GREY SON, JENNIFER GATES, PHILLIP KINGSTON, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 199th Judicia l District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199
- 03434
- 2016



### O RDER T he reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By postc ard dated November 28, 2016, we notified the court reporter for the 199 th Judicial District Court that the reporter’s record was overdue. We directed the court reporter to file the reporter’s record within thirty days. To date the reporter’s record has not been filed. Accordingly, we order Sheri J. Vecera, official court reporter for the 199 th Judicial
District Court t o file, within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order either (1) the reporter’s record; (2) written verification no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant has not requested, paid for, or made arrangements to pay for the record. We notifyappellant that if we receive verification the reporter’s record has not been requested, or that

appellant has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, we will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c).
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to:
Honorable Angela Tucker Presiding Judge 199 th Judicial District Court
Sheri J. Vecera Official Court Reporter 199 th Judicial District Court

All parties

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
**Exhibit      99.7**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED **

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|            |                                           |   |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
| By:   | /s/                Len Vernon             |   |
|            | Len VernonDirector, Finance and Administration |   |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tektronix, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 27, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
H. Wills, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: October 5, 2005

/s/ RICHARD H. WILLS
-------------------------------------
Richard H. Wills
President and Chief Executive Officer
Group 4 – Google’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief 

(Civil Case Nos. 6:20-cv-00572-ADA, 6:20-cv-00581-ADA, and 6:20-cv-00582-ADA) 

EXHIBIT #3 

Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 2 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 3 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 4 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 5 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 6 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 7 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 8 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 9 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 10 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 11 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 12 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 13 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 02/12/21 Page 14 of 14
Exhibit 32.A
 
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Norman G. Holmes, President, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Norman G. HolmesNorman G. HolmesPresident(Principal Executive Officer)Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyNovember 5, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and will be retained by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FESTUS TILLMAN III

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 0 100

_____ ________________________/

Opinion filed May 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela Cox , Judge

.

Festus Tillman III , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CU RIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, CJ., LEWIS and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.