alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, James M. Papada, III, Chief Executive Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31,
      2006 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2)   information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Technitrol, Inc.


Dated: May 9, 2006                                    /s/ James M. Papada, III
       -----------                                    ------------------------
                                                      James M. Papada, III

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be
retained by Technitrol, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of
the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
#### MOON v. STATE.

No. 26419.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 6, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State,

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The’appellant was convicted for the offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $50.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 17, 2013

NO. 03-11-00700-CV

Revel Thom, Appellant

v.

Rebel’s Honky Tonk; Rainbow Cattle Company, Inc., and Zack Truesdell, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED ON MOTION FOR REHEARING -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the district court’s summary 

judgment. IT IS THEREFORE ordered that appellant Revel Thom’s motions for rehearing and 

reconsideration en banc are denied; that the opinion and judgment dated August 30, 2012, are 

withdrawn; and that the summary judgment of the district court is in all things affirmed. It is 

FURTHER ordered that the appellant pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and 

the court below; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                              J. CREW GROUP, INC.

                               State of          Name Under Which
Name of Subsidiary             Incorporation     Subsidiary Does Business
------------------             -------------     ------------------------

J. Crew Operating Corp.        Delaware          J. Crew Operating Corp.
J. Crew Inc.                   New Jersey        J. Crew Inc.
ERL, Inc.                      New Jersey        ERL, Inc.
Grace Holmes, Inc.             Delaware          (J. Crew Retail Stores)
H.F.D. No. 55, Inc.            Delaware          (J. Crew Factory Outlet Stores)
C & W Outlet, Inc.             New York          C & W Outlet, Inc.
J. Crew International, Inc.    Delaware          J. Crew International, Inc.
J. Crew Services, Inc.         Delaware          J. Crew Services, Inc.
#### Sam MAINOUS, appellant, v. J. S. MARCUM, appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 15, 1954.

Wm. A. Hamm, London, for appellant.

Pleaz Wm. Mobley, Roy W. House, Manchester, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a $1,500 judgment in appellee’s favor for damage to a coal truck arising out of an accident on the highway. Having considered the grounds of reversal urged by the appellant, in our opinion the case was properly submitted to the jury and the damages awarded are not excessive.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### RICE v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 19, 1953.

Don A. Ward and Sam M. Ward, Hazard, for appellant.

*441J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. 'Gen., and Squire N. Wi-lliams, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

SIMS, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Junior Rice, was convicted of storehouse breaking and his punishment was fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year. He assigns but one ground for reversal of the judgment, the court erred in instructing the jury.

The indictment charged Rice alone committed the crime. The proof showed several persons broke into the storehouse of Ajax Coal Company on the occasion in question and the court after instructing the jury they should convict Rice if they believed beyond a reasonable doubt that he broke into the storehouse, in a second instruction permitted the jury to convict him if he was “present aiding and abetting such other person or persons in the commission of the crime”.

In a long and unbroken line of decisions, this court has consistently held that where an indictment charged one alone with the commission of a crime, it is error to instruct that he may be convicted if he aided and abetted another in its commission. Mulligan v. Com., 1886, 84 Ky. 229, 1 S.W. 417; Bailey v. Com., 1943, 295 Ky. 441, 174 S.W.2d 719.

The learned assistant attorney general who briefed the case admits this is the law. Also, he admits the rule in this jurisdiction is that an accused does not have to’ object or except to an instruction at the time it is given and it is sufficient if he raises the question for the first time in his motion for a new trial. Skidmore v. Com., 311 Ky. 176, 223 S.W.2d 739. However, he cites us to a text and to several foreign cases to the effect that an accused to save his exception to an instruction must object at the time it is given, 3 Am.Jur. “Appeal and Error”, § 378, p. 108; 53 Am.Jur. “Trial”, § 824, p. 604; State v. Wyman, 118 Conn. 501, 173 A. 155, 93 A.L.R. 913; State v. Capiro, 27 N.M. 265, 199 P. 1012, 18 A.L.R. 914; State v. Francis, 152 S.C. 17, 149 S.E. 348, 70 A.L.R. 1133, and he asks us to change our rule.

This invitation we must decline as we think the rule is salutary which puts the burden on the trial court to give the whole law of a criminal case without requiring the accused to question the correctness of the instructions before filing his motion for a new trial.

The judgment is reversed for this error in the instructions. All other questions are reserved.
Exhibit 23.3
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
  We refer to our report entitled "Report on Reserves Data by Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor" dated March 21, 2011 evaluating the reserves attributable to Sonde Resources Corp. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2010 (the "Report").
  We hereby consent to references to our name and to the Report in the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We also confirm that we have read the Annual Information Form included in the Annual Report on Form 40-F and that we have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained in it that are derived from the Report or that are within our knowledge as a result of the services we performed in connection with the Report.
  Yours truly,GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD./s/ John H. StillingJohn H. Stilling, P. Eng.Vice-President
 
 Calgary, Alberta
 March 25, 2011
(LOGO)FT MORTGAGE COMPANIES

2974 LBJ FREEWAY  ATLANTIC COAST MORTGAGE  MNC MORTGAGE
DALLAS, TX 75234  CARL I. BROWN MORTGAGE   HOMEBANC MORTGAGE
972 484-5600

FIRST TENNESSEE MORTGAGE
SUNBELT NATIONAL MORTGAGE


Arthur Andersen LLP
Suite 1100
100 Peabody Place
Memphis, Tennessee 38103

Dear Sirs:

As of and for the year ended  December 31, 1997,  FT Mortgage  Companies and its
wholly-owned  subsidiary First Tennessee Mortgage Services, Inc. (the "Company")
has  complied in all  material  respects,  except for the matters  disclosed  in
Exhibit  I, with the  minimum  servicing  standards  set  forth in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE
BANKERS. As of and for this same period,  the Company had in effect a fidelity
bond policy in the amount of $70,000,000  and an errors and omissions  policy in
the amount of $25,000,000.


                                                       /s/Gary B. Klinger
                                                       Gary B. Klinger
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                                          February 20, 1998



                                                                      EXHIBIT I

MATTER #1:

The Company is required to maintain a loan  servicing file for each of the loans
it services.  During an inventory  of files in prior  years,  the Company  noted
several missing files. The situation reported in the prior year still exists.

MANAGEMENT CORRECTIVE ACTION

The  Company  maintains   collateral   documentation  files  with  the  document
custodians. Internal loan servicing fries will be recreated as necessary.

MATTER #2:

The Company is required to analyze  escrow  balances  for all loans on an annual
basis.  Testing  in prior  years  revealed  a group of loans on which an  escrow
analysis  had not been  performed  in the  preceding  12 months.  The  situation
reported in the prior year still exists.

MANAGEMENT CORRECTIVE ACTION

Management  was made aware of the issue in the prior year and  performed  escrow
analyses on a large  number of the loans  identified  and is  currently  working
through the remainder of the loans
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By Notice dated March 23, 2000, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 30, 2000, (65 FR 16963), Lilly Del Caribe, Inc., Chemical Plant, Kilometer 146.7, State Road 2, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico 00680, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of dextropropoxyphene (9273), a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule II.                

The firm plans to bulk manufacture product for distribution to its customers.

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Lilly Del Caribe, Inc., to manufacture dextropropoxyphene is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Lilly Del Caribe, Inc. on a regular basis to ensure that the company's continued registration is consistent with the public interest. This investigation included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, audits of the company's records, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed above is granted.

      ( print page 63891)    
Dated: October 16, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-27427  Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
# Checklist **Pre -** **flight**  Review flight area on Google Earth  Condition of airframe  Condition of power plant / propellers  Ensure antennas are attached  All batteries charged  Camera charged and functioning **Flight Set -**  **up**  Set up GPS for home / landing point  Checks weather (Winds, Visibility, Ceiling)  Advise anyone in the landing / launch site 50’ radius for safety **Flight**  Monitor GPS signal and battery level frequently  Stay clear of air traffic and obstacles  Check/clear the landing site 50’ radius before landing **Pos t**  **- Flight**   Turn power off camera, aircraft, and controller  Verify on damage occurred during the flight **Emergency**  Unstable or unsafe flight, land immediately.  Lost connect occurs, attempt to reconnect signal rapidly

# Customer Sign **- Off**  As the customer of this engagement you understand and agree that Cate Aerial Services will be flying over your property while record ing pictures and videos . We will operate under the F AA rules and the following company rules to ensure the safety of the public and their privacy.  **We will not fly above 200’ of the launch elevation**  **We will not fly if the area is unsafe for people, property, or aircraft**  **We will land aircraft immediate ly if**  **any technical issues occur during flight**   **We will land air**  **craft if any safety issue occur during flight**  **If neighbors have a privacy concern, we will not fly until it is resolved**  **Any pictures/ videos have privacy concerns they will not be**  **made available**  **You agree to limiting the people within the launch/landing site**  Customer Signature X____________________________________ Date

_____________________ Site Address

_____________________________________

_____________________________________

_____________________________________
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AXT, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|Date: March 14, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/WILSON W. CHEUNG                     
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                     |  |     |  | Wilson W. Cheung Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
Directors Compensation



 Exhibit 10.25 
  
 HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC. 
  

DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION FOR 2005 AND 2006 SUMMARY SHEET 
  

				
	 ANNUAL BOARD RETAINER1
	  	$	40,000
	 (Paid in 4 installments)
	  	 	 
		
	 ANNUAL COMMITTEE CHAIRMANSHIP RETAINER1
	  	 	 
	 (Paid in 4 installments)
	  	 	 
		
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	10,000
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	7,500
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
	  	$	7,500
		
	 BOARD MEETING FEE
	  	$	1,000
		
	 COMMITTEE MEETING FEE
	  	$	1,000


			
		
	 EQUITY RETAINER2
	  	 
	 Grant of Restricted Common Stock Upon Appointment
	  	15,000 Shares
	 Annual Grant of Restricted Common Stock
	  	5,700 Shares



	1	Annual retainers are prorated to reflect the portion of the year that the director serves on the board. The annual board retainer was increased from $20,000 to
$40,000 effective July 1, 2005. 


	2	On October 1, 2005, independent directors, except for Mr. John Moody, received a one-time catch-up grant of 5,050 shares of restricted common stock and the
annual grant of 5,700 shares of restricted common stock. Mr. John Moody, who was appointed to the board on November 8, 2005, received a grant of 15,000 shares of restricted common stock on December 1, 2005. These awards vest
pro-ratably over a three-year period on the first day of each quarter beginning on January 1, 2006.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62739-62740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26870]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group Subcommittee F--Manpower & Training.
    Date: November 15-17, 2000.
    Time: 8:00 am to 12:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Georgetown Holiday Inn, 2101 Wisconsin Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: Mary Bell, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National 
Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, PHS, DHHS, 6116 
Executive Boulevard, Room 8113, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, 301-496-
7978.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 62740]]


    Dated: October 11, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-26870 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 23.1

        Consent of UHY LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
GSV, Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements on
Form S-8 (Nos.  333-75159 and  333-91575) of GSV, inc. of our report dated March
29, 2007, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of GSV, Inc. as of December
31, 2006, and the related  consolidated  statement of operations,  stockholders'
equity,  and cash flows for the year then  ended,  which  report  appears in the
December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-KSB of GSV, Inc.

New Haven, Connecticut
March 30, 2007
Opinion issued July 16, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00437-CV

———————————

IN RE 247 FREIGHT SERVICES, LLC AND ADEWALE OLUBUMMO, 

Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, 247 Freight Services, LLC and Adewale Olubummo, have filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the trial court to reverse 

its order denying relators’ motion to strike intervention.

1

 

1 The underlying case is 247 Freight Services, LLC and Adewale Olubummo v. A.H. 

United Carriers, Inc., Henry Godwin and Adebayo Smith, cause number 

2017-80440, pending in the 125th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the 

Honorable Kyle Carter presiding.
2

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Hightower.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         752,618
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  972,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,900
<INVENTORY>                                  2,370,132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,059,700
<PP&E>                                       5,101,189
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,711,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,184,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,678,891
<BONDS>                                      1,215,111
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,303
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,635,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,184,303
<SALES>                                      2,083,419
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,083,419
<CGS>                                        1,395,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,529,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,238
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                110,912
<INCOME-TAX>                                    39,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             71,512
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (893)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,619
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .026
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .025
        

</TABLE>