alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2769 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2769

  To impose a moratorium on conferences held by the Internal Revenue 
                                Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2013

  Mr. Roskam introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To impose a moratorium on conferences held by the Internal Revenue 
                                Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Playing on Citizen's Cash 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON IRS CONFERENCES.

    The Internal Revenue Service shall not hold any conference until 
the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration submits a report 
to Congress--
            (1) certifying that the Internal Revenue Service has 
        implemented all of the recommendations set out in such 
        Inspector General's report titled ``Review of the August 2010 
        Small Business/Self-Employed Division's Conference in Anaheim, 
        California'', and
            (2) describing such implementation.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3095 

To ensure that any new or revised requirement providing for the screening, 

testing, or treatment of individuals operating commercial motor vehicles 

for sleep disorders is adopted pursuant to a rulemaking proceeding, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 

Mr. BUCSHON (for himself, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. RADEL, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. 

YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. HANNA, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. RIBBLE, Mr. MEEHAN, 

and Mr. SOUTHERLAND) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To ensure that any new or revised requirement providing 

for the screening, testing, or treatment of individuals 

operating commercial motor vehicles for sleep disorders 

is adopted pursuant to a rulemaking proceeding, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3095 IH

1 SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATOR RE2 QUIREMENTS RELATING TO SLEEP DIS3 ORDERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transportation 

5 may implement or enforce a requirement providing for the 

6 screening, testing, or treatment (including consideration 

7 of all possible treatment alternatives) of individuals oper8 ating commercial motor vehicles for sleep disorders only 

9 if the requirement is adopted pursuant to a rulemaking 

10 proceeding. 

11 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall not apply 

12 to a requirement that was in force before September 1, 

13 2013. 

14 (c) SLEEP DISORDERS DEFINED.—In this section, 

15 the term ‘‘sleep disorders’’ includes obstructive sleep 

16 apnea. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. as of
September 30, 1996, and for the nine months ended, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         112,748
<SECURITIES>                                    37,445
<RECEIVABLES>                                  137,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,410
<INVENTORY>                                     19,569
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               362,026
<PP&E>                                       2,362,609
<DEPRECIATION>                                 802,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,933,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          370,492
<BONDS>                                        890,545
<COMMON>                                        61,088
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              359
<PREFERRED>                                     29,038
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,963,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,933,418
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               878,262
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  756,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (136,588)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,343
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                227,546
<INCOME-TAX>                                   111,496
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            116,050
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   116,050
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.89
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 22-0005 

IN RE THE MOTION OF JESSICA M. McKEE 

FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE 

STATE OF MONTANA 

FiLL 

NOV 22 2022 

Bowf-n Gt '4enwood 

c le-, Court 

0 R.DER' 

Jessica M. McKee has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of 

Montana pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar 

Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the 

Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that McKee has provided the necessary 

documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion 

under Rule V. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Jessica M. McKee may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of 

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk 

of the Montana Supreme Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this day of November, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

(-xtt-/-

11/22/2022

Case Number: PR 22-0005
2 

Justices
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

BRYNNE SOUKUP,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. and 

FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS, 

LLC

Defendants. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-648-RP

PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT DISCLOSURE

TO: FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS, LLC

Plaintiff, BRYNNE SOUKUP, by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby 

serve this Expert Disclosure and state:

The Plaintiff hereby designates Daniel B. Ross and Trenton N. Lacy, or their 

designee, as an expert on the issue of attorney’s fees and costs and all factors related to an 

award of reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees and costs.

Daniel B. Ross

Texas State Bar No. 00789810

dan@rosslawgroup.com

Trenton N. Lacy

Texas State Bar No. 24106176

trenton@rosslawgroup.com

ROSS SCALISE LAW GROUP

1104 San Antonio Street

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 474-7677 Telephone

OPINION PROVIDED: Reasonableness and amount of attorney’s fees and costs to be 

recovered by Plaintiff should Plaintiff prevail.

Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 36 Filed 05/11/21 Page 1 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served via email 

and U.S. Mail, on May 11, 2021, to:

Sarah Voorhies Myers 

Amy L. McIntire 

CHAFFE McCALL, L.L.P. 

2300 Energy Centre

1100 Poydras Street

New Orleans, LA 70163

myers@chaffe.com

mcintire@chaffe.com

H. Michael Bush 

CHAFFE McCALL, L.L.P. 

1100 Poydras Street, Suite 2300 

New Orleans, LA 70163-2300 

Tel: 504-585-7000 

Fax: 504-585-7075

 

E-mail: bush@chaffe.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS, LLC 

ROSS SCALISE LAW GROUP

1104 San Antonio Street

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 474-7677 Telephone

/s/ Trenton N. Lacy

Daniel B. Ross

Texas State Bar No. 00789810

dan@rosslawgroup.com

Trenton N. Lacy

Texas State Bar No. 24106176

trenton@rosslawgroup.com

Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 36 Filed 05/11/21 Page 2 of 3
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 36 Filed 05/11/21 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41274

 

SIERRA CLUB; WILDERNESS SOCIETY; TEXAS COMMITTEE ON NATURAL

RESOURCES

Plaintiffs-Appellees

versus

R MAX PETERSON, ET AL

Defendants

DANIEL GLICKMAN, In his official capacity as the Secretary of the

Department of Agriculture; GLORIA MANNING, In her official

capacity as the Acting Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service,

Region 8; MICHAEL DOMBECK, In his official capacity as Chief,

U.S. Forest Service; RONALD RAUM, In his official capacity as the

Forest Supervisor, National Forests and Grasslands in Texas

Defendants-Appellants

TEXAS FORESTRY ASSOCIATION; SOUTHERN TIMBER PURCHASERS COUNCIL

Intervenors-DefendantsAppellants

- - - - -

Appeals from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

- - - - -

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 16, 1999, 5 Cir., 1999, _____F.3d____)

(January 21, 2000)

Before KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, 

SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, 

BENAVIDES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested

a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc and a majority of

the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a

rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the

court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. 

The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of

supplemental briefs. 

_______________________________________

*Judge Parker is recused and did not participate in this matter.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ALISHA JOHNSON,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 56 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID LOPEZ,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00058-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20110D03070)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant David Lopez has filed a motion to dismiss his own appeal. The Court grants

Appellant’s motion and dismisses this appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2 (governing voluntary 

dismissals in criminal cases).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

October 31, 2019

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
#### Ex parte MASSINGILL.

No. 23850.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 15, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*838GRAVES, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Judge of the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, remanding relator to the custody of the sheriff of said county to be delivered by him to an agent from the State of Wisconsin pursuant to an extradition warrant issued by the Governor of this state upon the requisition of the Governor of Wisconsin, in which state relator is charged with the crime of robbery.

The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
exv10w6



 






Exhibit 10.6




Rules for Payment of Meeting Fees, Retainers and Expenses

To The

Board of Directors of FBL Financial Group, Inc.





	1.	 	Non-management Class B directors receive an annual retainer of $10,000. Non-management
Class A directors receive an annual retainer of $24,000. Unless other arrangements are
requested, one-fourth of the annual retainer will be paid to directors on a quarterly
basis.
	 
	2.	 	Additionally, non-management directors receive a fee of $1,250 for each board meeting
attended in person.
	 
	3.	 	Non-management directors receive a fee of $500 for telephonic meetings or telephonic
participation in a regular meeting.
	 
	4.	 	Non-management committee members receive a fee of $500 for the Class B Nominating
Committee meetings attended in person and $250 for telephonic meetings.
	 
	5.	 	Non-management committee members receive a fee of $1,000 for each of the following
committee meetings attended in person and $500 for telephonic meetings: Compensation,
Finance, Executive, and Class A Nominating and Governance.
	 
	6.	 	Audit committee members receive a fee of $1,000 for all committee meetings.
	 
	7.	 	The chair of a committee receives an additional 100 percent in meeting fees per
committee meeting, equal to 200 percent of the non-chair committee members of the
respective committee. With the exception of the chair of the Class B Nominating Committee
who receives an additional 50 percent of the non-chair committee members.
	 
	8.	 	Non-management directors receive annually 4,000 stock options in FBL Financial Group
Class A Common Stock.
	 
	9.	 	Directors are reimbursed for travel expenses incurred in attending board or committee
meetings. Mileage is paid at the Internal Revenue Service reimbursement rate, to and from
the meeting site or to and from the airport.
	 
	10.	 	The Internal Revenue Service requires receipts on items such as lodging, air travel and
other major expenses in order to classify these expenses as a reimbursable to directors
instead of income.
	 
	11.	 	Retainers, meeting fees and expenses are paid quarterly, initiated by the corporate
office. Expense forms need to be completed and submitted by each director for reimbursement
of their expenses.





Effective: 1/01/06
Exhibit
10.2


 


Schedule
Required by Instruction 2 to Item 601

of Regulation S-K 


 


	
  Name of Executive Officer

  Signing Waiver Letter

  
	
   

  
	
  Leonard Shaykin

  
	
  Gordon Link

  
	
  Kai Larson

  



 


Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc


4840 Pearl East Circle, Suite 300W


Boulder, CO 80301


 


Re:  Employment Agreement of
October 1, 2001 (the “Employment Agreement”)


 


Gentlemen:


 


I refer you to paragraph 6(f) of the Employment Agreement. Capitalized
terms not defined in this letter have the meanings given them in that
Employment Agreement.


 


Please be advised that the undersigned Executive hereby waives any
right to assert that he has Good Reason to resign from employment with the
Company if the Company fails to comply with section 6(f)ii of the Employment
Agreement. This waiver is limited solely to any Change of Control that may be
deemed to have occurred as a result of the acquisition of beneficial ownership
of securities of the Company by investors (the “Investors”) in the private
placement described in the preliminary proxy statement of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2006.


 


This waiver shall not apply to any other acquisition of stock or other
transaction that results in a Change of Control, including a Change of Control
that results from the acquisition of beneficial ownership of additional securities
of the Company by an Investor. Furthermore, this waiver shall be null and void
if, in the reasonable opinion of the Executive, any Investor takes action to change
the Company’s business or management in a manner materially detrimental to either
the Company’s business and operations or to the Executive’s interest as an
employee of the Company. Such action could include, without limitation, any action
affecting the Company’s strategic direction, management, corporate governance, compensation
or personnel. For the avoidance of doubt, the exercise by SSF of its right to
designate up to two persons for election to the Company’s board of directors
shall not of itself constitute the taking any such action


 


Executive shall give the Company notice promptly if he determines that
action has been taken rendering this waiver to be null and void.


 


Very truly yours,


 


 


[Executive]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5665 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5665

 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1-propanone, 2-methyl-1-[4-
              (methylthio)phenyl]-2-(4-morpholinyl)-(9ci).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1-propanone, 2-methyl-1-[4-
              (methylthio)phenyl]-2-(4-morpholinyl)-(9ci).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-PROPANONE, 2-METHYL-1-[4-(METHYLTHIO)PHENYL]-2-(4-
              MORPHOLINYL)-(9CI).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1-propanone, 2-     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          methyl-1-[4-                                                      12/31/2015
                          (methylthio)pheny
                          l]-2-(4-
                          morpholinyl)-
                          (9ci) (CAS No.
                          71868-10-5)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2934.99.39)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as amended by OSRA 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued1227F
Fast Shipping Co., 201 Sevilla Avenue, Suite 306, Coral Gables, FL 33134
August 13, 2000.4130NF
GSG Investment Inc. d/b/a Worldwide Logistics Company, 8801 Bellanca Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90045
September 7, 2000.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 00-27435 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### GIVENS v. STATE.

No. 26210.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 28, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### Ex parte LERMA.

No. 23098.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1945.

Rehearing Granted March 28, 1945.

*351Roy A. Scott, of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Relator was charged by complaint in the justice court of Nueces County with the offense of murder. Upon an examining trial, after hearing evidence, he was remanded without bail to the custody of the sheriff to await the action of the grand jury. He, thereafter, made application to the district judge for a writ of habeas corpus, which was granted, and, upon the hearing of such writ, bail was again denied him, and he appeals.

There was an agreement by and between relator’s attorneys and the State that the testimony taken on the examining trial in the justice court, and which was in writing, should be used in its entirety in this present case, and we find same in this record, filed as a statement of facts. This 'statement is entirely in question and answer form, in the first place, and again same is not approved by the trial judge, and same has no file mark thereon evidencing the fact that it was filed in the court below. Under this array of objections thereto we are convinced that such a purported statement of facts should not be considered by this court. See Art. 760, Subdiv. 1, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., and note 23 thereunder.

There being no statement of facts before this court which we can consider, it will be presumed that the judgment remanding relator without bail was supported by the evidence and in accordance with law. Ex parte Adams, Tex.Cr.App., 13 S.W.2d 842; Ex parte Welburn, 70 Tex.Cr.R. 464, 157 S.W. 154; Ex parte Wair, 130 Tex.Cr.R. 204, 93 S.W.2d 160.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

Since writing the above opinion, relator has furnished this court with a statement of facts in narrative form, properly approved by the trial judge, and filed in proper time, and we now consider the same.

Under the facts herein shown we are of the opinion that relator is entitled to bail, and this cause is therefore reversed and bail fixed in the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars, to be conditioned as required by law.