alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2702]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Extension of Time To Submit Comments on Consent Decree 
Lodged Pursuant to Sections 104 and 107 of CERCLA

    On December 1, 1999, the United States lodged a proposed Consent 
Decree with the United States District Court for the Southern District 
of Texas, No. G-99-731, in United States of America v. GAF Corp., et 
al., pursuant to Sections 104 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9604 and 
9607. The proposed Consent Decree resolves civil claims of the United 
States against thirty-five de minimis generator Defendants for the Tex 
Tin Superfund Site located in Texas City and La Marque, Texas. The 
Defendants will pay a total of approximately $1.5 million in 
reimbursement of response costs at the Site.
    On December 16, 1999 a Notice was published which advised that the 
Department of Justice would receive comments relating to the proposed 
Consent Decree for 30 days following publication of the Notice. Notice 
is hereby given that the period during which the Department of Justice 
will receive comments relating to the proposed Consent Decree has been 
extended at the request of a member of the public. The Department of 
Justice will continue to accept comments through the 30th day following 
publication of this Notice. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
United States Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin 
Station, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to United States 
of America v. GAF Corp., et al., DJ No. 90-11-3-1669/1. The proposed 
Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United States 
Attorney for the Southern District of Texas, Houston, Texas, and the 
Region VI Office of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 
1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202. A copy of the proposed Consent 
Decree may be obtained by mail from the Department of Justice Consent 
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a 
copy, please enclose a check for reproduction costs (at 25 cents per 
page) in the amount of $14.75 for the Decree, payable to the Consent 
Decree Library.

Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-2702 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2445]

Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification have been filed in the Commission's rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITC, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by November 1, 2000. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired.

*Subject:*                     Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service (CC Docket No. 96-45), Western Wireless Corporation Petition for Preemption of an Order of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission.                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     2.                

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26600  Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
****

****

**Exhibit 31(ii)**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

	I,  Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer of  Taylor Devices, Inc., certify that:

        1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Taylor Devices, Inc.;

        2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

        3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

        4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))  [omitted]  for the small business issuer and have:

                (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

                (b)	[NOT REQUIRED]

                (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and

                (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer'sinternal control over financial reporting; and

        5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and theaudit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

                (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

                (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3029 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise certain rules 

relating to the status of qualified prepaid tuition programs under the 

securities laws. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2013 

Mr. HURT (for himself and Mr. DELANEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise 

certain rules relating to the status of qualified prepaid 

tuition programs under the securities laws. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘College Savings En5 hancement Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATUS OF QUALIFIED PREPAID TUITION PRO7 GRAMS. 

8 (a) REVISION OF RULES.—Not later than 270 days 

9 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Securities and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3029 IH

1 Exchange Commission shall revise its regulations con2 tained in— 

3 (1) section 230.144A(a)(1) of title 17, Code of 

4 Federal Regulations, to include qualified prepaid tui5 tion programs under the definition of a qualified in6 stitutional buyer; and 

7 (2) section 230.501 of such title, to include 

8 qualified prepaid tuition programs that have total 

9 assets in excess of $5,000,000 as accredited inves10 tors. 

11 (b) QUALIFIED PREPAID TUITION PROGRAM DE12 FINED.—For purposes of the revisions required by sub13 section (a), the term ‘‘qualified prepaid tuition program’’ 

14 means a qualified tuition program (as defined in section 

15 529(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 

16 U.S.C. 529(b)(1)(A)(i))) established and maintained by a 

17 State or agency or instrumentality of a State, and that 

18 satisfies the other requirements of such section 529. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Dennis OBrien, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Silver Mines, Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.  The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting for the Registrant and have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within this entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.  The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 12, 2008

By:      /s/ Dennis OBrien



Dennis OBrien, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

  


Advisory Committee on Women Veterans, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under Public Law 
92-463 that a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Women Veterans will 
be held on October 24-26, 2000, at the Department of Veterans Affairs, 
810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. All meetings will be held in 
conference room 230.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs regarding the needs of women veterans with respect to health 
care, rehabilitation, compensation, outreach, and other programs and 
activities administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs designed 
to meet such needs. The Committee will make recommendations to the 
Secretary regarding such activities.
    All sessions will be open to the public. Those who plan to attend 
should contact Ms. Maryanne Carson, Department of Veterans Affairs, 
Center for Women Veterans, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 
20420, at (202) 273-6193. Tentative agenda follows:

Tuesday, October 24

8:30a: Welcome and Introduction of New Members, Ms. Joan Furey
9:00a: Presentation of Appointment Certificates, The Honorable Hershel 
Gober, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Tentative)
9:30a-12n: Completion of 2000 Report
12n: Lunch
1:30p: Review of Agenda, Chair, Karen Ray, Col., USA (Ret)
2:00p: Role of the Advisory Committee in the Development of VA Programs 
for Women, Princess Aisha of Jordan (Tentative)
2:45p: Break
3:00p: Committee Update, Col. Ray
3:30p: Center for Women Veterans Update, Ms. Furey
4:15p: General Discussion, Committee
5:00p: Adjourn

Wednesday, October 25

8:30a: Persian Gulf Research Initiatives, Dr. Kelly Brix
9:15a: Veterans Health Administration, Ms. Carole Turner, Director, 
Women Veterans' Health Programs
10:15a: Break
10:30a: Veterans Benefits Administration, Ms. Lynda Petty, Women 
Veterans Coordinator
11:00a: Women Veterans Homeless Initiative, Ms. Gay Koerber and Dr. 
Robert Rosenheck
12n: Lunch
1:30p: Services for Women, Dr. Alfonso Batres, Director, Readjustment 
and Counseling Service
2:15p: Providing Services for African American Women Veterans: Factors 
to Consider, Col. Ray
3:00p: Break
3:15p: Providing Services for Hispanic Women Veterans: Factors to 
Consider, Committee Members: Ms. Consuelo Kickbusch and Ms. Bertha Cruz 
Hall
4:00p: General Discussion, Committee
5:00p: Adjourn

Thursday, October 26

9:00a: Planning Session: Committee
    <bullet> Review 2000 Report
    <bullet> FY 2001 Objectives
    <bullet> Subcommittee Assignments
    <bullet> Site Visit Designation
    <bullet> Set Date for Next Meeting
1:00p: Adjourn

    By direction of the Secretary.

    Dated: October 10, 2000.
Marvin R. Eason, By direction of the Secretary.
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-26665 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62356-62357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26777]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Revocations

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following ocean transportation intermediary

[[Page 62357]]

licenses have been terminated pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping 
Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission 
pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 
effective on the corresponding dates shown below:
    License Number: 2696N.
    Name: Burnham Service Company, Inc.
    Address: P.O. Box 7966, Columbus, GA 31829
    Date Revoked: September 22, 2000.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 0916F.
    Name: J.D. Smith Co., Inc.
    Address: Brooklyn Navy Yard, Building #3, 11th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 
11205.
    Date Revoked: September 18, 2000.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 00-26777 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 September 6 , 2005 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-10178

Non-Argument Calendar

 

D.C. Docket No. 04-00008-CR-HL-6

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CELSO SALAZAR CASTILLO,

 Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

 

(September 6, 2005)

Before BLACK, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Rick D. Collum, appointed counsel for Celso Salazar Castillo, in this direct
2

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit

of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no

issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Castillo’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2678 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

10360 Southwest 186th Street in Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘Larcenia 

J. Bullard Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2013 

Mr. GARCIA (for himself, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. SOUTHERLAND, Mr. 

YOHO, Mr. CRENSHAW, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. DESANTIS, Mr. 

MICA, Mr. POSEY, Mr. GRAYSON, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. 

NUGENT, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, 

Mr. ROSS, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. ROONEY, Mr. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. 

RADEL, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. DEUTCH, Ms. FRANKEL of Florida, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mr. DIAZBALART, and Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 10360 Southwest 186th Street in Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘Larcenia J. Bullard Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LARCENIA J. BULLARD POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 10360 Southwest 186th Street 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2678 IH

1 in Miami, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Larcenia J. Bullard Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Larcenia J. Bullard 

7 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2892 

To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to preclude law firms 

and licensed attorneys from the definition of a debt collector when 

taking certain actions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2013 

Mr. PERLMUTTER (for himself and Mr. BACHUS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to preclude 

law firms and licensed attorneys from the definition of 

a debt collector when taking certain actions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Debt Collection 

5 Practices Technical Clarification Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LEGAL PROCEEDING EXCEPTION. 

7 Section 803(6) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices 

8 Act (12 U.S.C. 1692a(6)) is amended— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2892 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (F) as sub2 paragraph (G); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(F) any law firm or licensed attorney— 

6 ‘‘(i) serving, filing, or conveying for7 mal legal pleadings, discovery requests, or 

8 other documents pursuant to the applicable 

9 rules of civil procedure; or 

10 ‘‘(ii) communicating in, or at the di11 rection of, a court of law or in depositions 

12 or settlement conferences, in connection 

13 with a pending legal action to collect a 

14 debt on behalf of a client; and’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS