alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex parte SANDERS.

No. 25080.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 1, 1950.

*503Letts & Mathis, Houston, for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Crim. Dist. Atty., E. T. Branch, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., Houston, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Honorable Frank Williford, Jr., Judge of the Criminal District Court of Harris County, refusing appellant’s application for discharge based upon his contention that he had served the time of his sentence of six months in the county jail.

It is shown by the record that he was committed on the 26th day of September, 1949, but that his sentence has been interrupted by successive reprieves issued by the Governor so that the actual time served was fifty-eight days, up to the 22nd day of August, 1950. The court heard the evidence on the application and so determined.

It is further recited that the second reprieve, dated January 18, 1950, expiring on March 22nd, 1950, provided that on said date the defendant would voluntarily return to said jail to finish out said term of six months, “which he did not do.”

The court relied on Ex parte Underwood, 94 Tex.Cr.R. 157, 248 S.W. 551; Ex parte Black, 123 Tex.Cr.R. 472, 59 S.W.2d 828; and Ex parte Wyatt, 29 Tex.App. 398, 16 S.W. 301. We are of the opinion that the court made the proper order and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           OCT-2-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-2-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-3-1999
<CASH>                                       2,554,772
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,075,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                    70,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,206,946
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,735,380
<PP&E>                                       4,841,393
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,986,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,717,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,094,399
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       129,454
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,237,907
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,717,802
<SALES>                                      2,318,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,451,473
<CGS>                                          940,234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,561,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,489
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,121,717)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (280,429)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (841,288)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (841,288)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.63)
        

</TABLE>
2011 Utica Shale Production

Ohio Department of Natural Resources

Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management

2045 Morse Rd. Bldg. F-2, Columbus Oh 43229-6693

Production Period : January 01, 2011 To December 31, 2011

Data Refreshed: 05/02/14

Prod 

Year Owner Name County Permit Number Civil Township Well Name/Well Number Oil (Barrels) Gas (MCF) Brine (Barrels)

Days in 

Production

Date First 

Production

2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC HARRISON 34067210570100 ARCHER NORTH AMERICAN COAL ROYALTY CO BUELL 8H 13472 1523465 8937 198 6/14/2011

2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC CARROLL 34019220730100 AUGUSTA MANGUN 22-15-5 8H 12334 322435 23585 206 7/24/2011

2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC CARROLL 34019220850000 CENTER 833530 BURGETT 7-15-6 8H-RS 654 0 2010 5 1/17/2012

2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC CARROLL 34019220810100 CENTER SHAW 20-14-5 5H 818 0 10263 11 1/17/2012

2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC CARROLL 34019220740000 EAST 833124 BUCEY 3H 2167 137192 2403 53 10/16/2011

2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC MAHONING 34099231350100 MILTON GEATCHES MAH 3H 758 0 8389 79 7/21/2011

2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC PORTAGE 34133244200100 SUFFIELD HOSEY POR 6H-X 583 0 1796 20

2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC CARROLL 34019220760100 WASHINGTON HARVEY 16-14-5 8H 6096 183142 9102 92 9/30/2011

2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC CARROLL 34019220750000 WASHINGTON 833129 NEIDER 3H 9444 395290 9519 130 8/25/2011

1 of 1
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**982 KA 13-01585**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BARRY WYZYKOWSKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (LYLE T. HAJDU OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MATTHEW B. POWERS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), rendered July 25, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sexual act in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sexual act in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50 [4]). To the extent that defendant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing survives his guilty plea, we conclude that it lacks merit ( see People v LaCroce , 83 AD3d 1388, 1388, lv denied 17 NY3d 807). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that Supreme Court erred in failing to recuse itself ( see People v Prado , 4 NY3d 725, 726, rearg denied 4 NY3d 795; People v Dewiel , 100 AD3d 1524, 1525, lv denied 20 NY3d 1010). In any event, that contention is without merit ( see generally People v Glynn , 21 NY3d 614, 618; People v Moreno , 70 NY2d 403, 405-406; People v Williams , 57 AD3d 1440, 1441, lv denied 12 NY3d 789).

Entered: September 26, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 32(ii)**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

                In connect with the quarterly report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2010 to befiled with Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

                (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

                (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

                It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| Date: October 13, 2010        | By: | /s/ Mark V. McDonough      |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                  |     | Mark V. McDonough,Chief Financial Officer           |
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  annual  report  of Rosedale Decorative Products,
Ltd(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Sidney  Ackerman,  President  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date: January 25, 2006                             By: /s/ SIDNEY ACKERMAN
                                                   ----------------------
                                                   Sidney Ackerman
                                                   President
----

**Exhibit      32**

**Written      Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial      Officer**

**Pursuant      to      18 U.S.C. §1350**

|  /s/              Ewen R. Cameron                                                                                                                                    |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ewen                R.                Cameron                                                                                                                             |   |
| Chief                Executive Officer                                                                                                                                    |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
|  /s/              Russell R. Lee III                                                                                                                                 |   |
| Russell                R.                Lee III                                                                                                                          |   |
| Chief                Financial Officer                                                                                                                                    |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
| Date:                      November                14, 2007 |   |

----
Presidential Documents

5407

Federal Register

Vol. 65, No. 24

Friday, February 4, 2000

Title 3—

The President

Presidential Determination No. 2000–10 of January 31, 2000

Determination Pursuant to Section 523 of the Foreign

Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs

Appropriations Act, 2000, as Contained in the Consolidated

Appropriations Act for FY 2000 (Public Law 106–113)

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to section 523 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and

Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2000, as Contained in the Consolidated

Appropriations Act for FY 2000 (Public Law 106–113), I hereby certify

that withholding from international financial institutions and other international organizations and programs funds appropriated or otherwise made

available pursuant to that Act is contrary to the national interest.

You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal

Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, January 31, 2000.

œ–

[FR Doc. 00–2684

Filed 2–3–00; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
## 05/07/2007: EPA Personnel Deployedto Greensburg, Kansas, for Tornado Response Page 1 of2 

# EP 

# : United States Environmental 

# Prote

# etten QeIlCY

News Releases By 

# State 

# EPA Personnel Deployed to Greensburg, Kansas, for Tornado Response Release date: 05/07/2007 Contact Information: Beckie Himes, (816) 896-0027, himes.beckie@epa.gov or Dianna Whitaker, (913) 909-5788, whitaker.dianna@epa.gov

Environmental News FOR IMMEDIATE'RELEASE (Kansas City, Kan., May 7, 2007) - On-scene coordinators (OSCs) from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are in Greensburg, Kan., to respond to potential hazardous materials from tornado damage. EPA also deployed the mobile command post from its Region 7 office in Kansas City, Kan. The command post enables the OSCs to establish communications via satellite link, and use on-board monitoring equipment to respond to hazardous materials. EPA Region 7 Administrator John B. Askew said, "EPA regional personnel will remain available as long as necessary to respond to this disaster." EPA has been on scene since May 5 assessing fuel releases, chlorine cylinders, anhydrous ammonia tanks, propane tanks, and other hazardous materials issues. EPA is also involved in reviewing polychlorinated biphenyl contamination related to damaged transformers. OSCs have assessed chlorine tanks at the city well house and helped stabilize a chlorine tank at the well house that was damaged by the tornado. EPA and local officials responded to a release from a large anhydrous ammonia-filled storage tank that had been damaged by the tornado. The release forced everyone within about five blocks of the tank to be evacuated for a short time. 

### ###

S_earch This Collection 

## I Search All Collections


## http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/8b770facf5edf6f1852573 59003fb6ge/cOb3098 5df... 2/3/2010
#### Nathan M. Klein, Plaintiff, *v.*Long Island Railroad Company, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

December 2, 1957.

*487
      *Otto M. Buerger*for defendant.

*Louis Stechel, Louis Schultz*and *Sidney Koenig*for plaintiff.

Cortland A. Johnson, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss, as failing to state a cause of action and for the court’s lack of jurisdiction of the subject of the action, the complaint purporting to plead a single cause of action herein, which appears .to seek a declaratory judgment (1) that article 7 of the Railroad Law is for various reasons unconstitutional and (2) that defend-.ant has forfeited its status under that daw. Assuming what may be doubtful, that plaintiff pleads facts entitling him to-maintain this action, an examination of the pertinent provisions - of the Constitution and the acts of public bodies called to the court’s attention upon the argument of the motion, leads the court to the conclusion that the statute attacked is not unconstitutional as a private rather than a general law; that it .does not violate the due process clause; that it deprives the Public Service Commission of no power guaranteed it by the State Constitution; nor is any fact pleaded conferring upon the court any power to declare a forfeiture of defendant’s status heretofore acquired under the statute mentioned.

The motion to dismiss is accordingly granted.

Submit order.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3042 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3042

  To prohibit the use of the social cost of carbon in any regulatory 
  impact analysis until a Federal law is enacted authorizing such use.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2013

  Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in 
    addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the use of the social cost of carbon in any regulatory 
  impact analysis until a Federal law is enacted authorizing such use.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taking Hold of Regulations to 
Increase Vital Employment In Energy Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF SOCIAL COST OF CARBON IN ANALYSIS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law or any 
executive order, no Federal agency may use the social cost of carbon in 
order to incorporate any social benefits of reducing carbon dioxide 
emissions in any regulatory impact analysis unless and until a Federal 
law is enacted authorizing such use.
    (b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``social cost of 
carbon'' means the social cost of carbon as described in the technical 
support document entitled ``Technical Support Document: Technical 
Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis 
Under Executive Order 12866'', published by the Interagency Working 
Group on Social Cost of Carbon, United States Government, in May 2013, 
or any successor or substantially related document, or any other 
estimate of the monetized damages associated with an incremental 
increase in carbon dioxide emissions in a given year.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 63824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27311]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-117162-99]
RIN 1545-AY23


Tax Treatment of Cafeteria Plans; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to proposed regulations 
that were published in the Federal Register on Thursday, March 23, 2000 
(65 FR 15587) relating to tax treatment of cafeteria plans.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine L. Keller, (202) 622-6080 
(not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The notice of proposed rulemaking that is the subject of this 
correction is under section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the proposed regulations contain an error that may 
prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the proposed regulations (REG-
117162-99), that were the subject of FR Doc. 00-5818, is corrected as 
follows:
    On page 15587, column 2, the regulation heading in the middle of 
the column, line 5, the ``RIN 1545-AX59'' is corrected to read ``RIN 
1545-AY23''.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special Counsel (Modernization and 
Strategic Planning).
[FR Doc. 00-27311 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the annual report of Qiao Xing Universal Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rui Lin Wu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    RUI LIN WURui Lin WuChief Executive Officer


July 15, 2011
High Desert Power Project

EPA-R09-OAR-2010-0129 

### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IX

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

HIGH DESERT POWER PROJECT (HDPP)

PSD PERMIT (SE 98-01)
Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2010-0129

DOCKET INDEX

Docket Section or Item Date of Item FDMS

I. Documents Submitted by Applicant

 Proposed Revisions/Administrative Changes to Condit ions in PSD Permit NSR 4-4-4, SE 98-01 to Gerardo Rios 4/6/04 √

 Proposed Revisions/Administrative Changes to Condit ions in PSD Permit NSR 4-4-4, SE 98-01 to Gerardo Rios 9/20/06 √

 Proposed Revisions/Administrative Changes to Condit ions in PSD Permit NSR 4-4-4, SE 98-01 to Deborah Jordan 12/5/07 √

 Proposed Revisions/Administrative Changes to Condit ions in PSD Permit NSR 4-4-4, SE 98-01, regarding Startup/Shutdown Provisions to Anita Lee 12/5/07 √

 Information to Support Request to Revise PSD Permit SE 98-01, including copy of Toshiba Turbine Operation Instruction Manual and CEMS Monitoring Plan to Anit a Lee 4/7/08 √

 Email Response from Jon Boyer to Anita Lee 4/22/08 √

 Email Response from Jon Boyer to Anita Lee 4/25/08 √

 Information to Support Request to Revise PSD Permit SE
98-01 to Anita Lee 7/28/08 √

 Administrative Order of Consent to HDPP 10/31/08 √

 Email from Jon Boyer to Anita Lee 9/25/09 √

II. California Energy Commission (CEC) Documents

 Request for US EPA Concurrence Regarding Two Air Quality Amendment Requests from Terrence O’Brien to
Deborah Jordan 10/26/07 √

 Staff Analysis of Proposed Modifications of Air Qua lity Conditions Relating to Source Test Intervals and Ot her Administrative Changes 4/8/08 √High Desert Power Project

EPA-R09-OAR-2010-0129 III. Initial Permit Documents

 Initial PSD Permit (SE 98-01) 2/01 √

 Ambient Air Quality Impact Report (NSR 4-4-4, SE 98 -01) 2/01 √

IV. Correspondence from EPA

 Response to CEC Request for US EPA Concurrence Regarding Two Air Quality Amendment Requests from
Gerardo Rios to Terrence O’Brien 1/10/08 √

V. Notice of the Proposed Draft Permit

 Cover Letter to HDPP re: proposed PSD permit 2/5/10 √

 Proposed PSD Permit Revision (SE 98-01) 2/10 √

 Statement of Basis and Appendix 1 and 2 2/10 √

 Public Notice 2/10 √

 Aviso al Publico 2/10 √

VI. Final Permit Documents

 Cover Letter to HDPP 3/10 √

 Final PSD Permit 3/10 √