alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Transmitting STV Group's First Quarter 10Q.  Period ending 12/31/95.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000095045
<NAME> STV GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         187,000
<SECURITIES>                                   136,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,820,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    90,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,693,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,714,000
<PP&E>                                      12,016,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,371,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,811,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,927,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,921,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,443,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,811,000
<SALES>                                     22,983,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,983,000
<CGS>                                       16,121,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,750,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             428,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                254,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   151,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            103,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   103,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7848

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KATHY NELSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CR-90-280-6, CA-96-696-6)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 20, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kathy Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Nelson, Nos. CR-90-280-6; CA96-696-6 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 74

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Paxton Benjamin Heywood, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20210259

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial 

District, the Honorable Pamela A. Nesvig, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Anna A. Argenti, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and 

appellee; submitted on brief.

Joshua L. Weatherspoon and Aaron D. Pulanco, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant 

and appellant; submitted on brief.

FILED 

IN THE OFFICE OF THE 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

APRIL 14, 2022 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1

State v. Heywood

No. 20210259

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Paxton Heywood appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury 

found him guilty of gross sexual imposition. Heywood argues the district court 

erred by granting the State’s motion to amend the information, and the jury 

verdict was not supported by sufficient evidence. Viewing the evidence in the 

light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude substantial evidence exists that 

could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of conviction. We also 

conclude the court did not abuse its discretion by granting the State’s motion 

to amend the information. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) 

and (4).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8178-8179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3452]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Application of Rugby Aviation LLC D/B/A Northwest Sky Ferry for 
Commuter Air Carrier Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2010-2-7) Docket OST-2009-
0188.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Rugby

[[Page 8179]]

Aviation, LLC d/b/a Northwest Sky Ferry fit, willing, and able, and 
awarding it commuter air carrier authority to conduct scheduled 
commuter service.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
February 26, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket DOT-OST-2009-0188 and addressed to Docket Operations, (M-30, 
Room W12-140), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey 
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the 
parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine O'Toole, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56, Room W86-489), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9721.

    Dated: February 16, 2010.
Susan L. Kurland,
Assistant Secretary For Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010-3452 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIRNA IRENE VAZQUEZ VITAL,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72189

Agency No. A075-763-039

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Mirna Irene Vazquez Vital, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for

FILED

SEP 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-72189

cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that

Vazqez Vital failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her

qualifying relatives. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th

Cir. 2005).

Vazquez Vital’s contention that the IJ’s alleged bias deprived her of due

process is not supported by the record, and her remaining due process challenge is

unpersuasive.

We reject Vazquez Vital’s contention that the BIA issued a boilerplate

decision without reviewing the record, because she has not overcome the

presumption that the BIA did review the record. See Larita-Martinez v. INS, 220

F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (9th Cir. 2000).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, included
herein, dated January 15, 1999, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
1998 and for the year then ended in the two Registration Statements on Form S-8
for the "Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan" and "Midwest Banc
Holdings, Inc. Employees' Retirement Plan" filed by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 7, 1998 and July 10, 1998,
respectively.


                                     /s/  Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Oak Brook, Illinois
March 24, 1999
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00383-CV

Denise Trauth in Her Official Capacity and Individual Capacity as 

President of Texas State University, Appellant

v.

David Wiley, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

NO. 19-1229, THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellee David Wiley has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this interlocutory 

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Wiley informed the Court that he has filed in the trial court a

notice of nonsuit without prejudice of the underlying lawsuit, nonsuiting his entire case against 

appellant and the other defendant in the case, which renders this appeal moot. The Texas 

Supreme Court has held that the nonsuit of all claims in the trial court between the parties to an 

interlocutory appeal deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction over the appeal. See University 

of Tex. Med. Branch at Galveston v. Estate of Blackmon, 195 S.W.3d 98, 100-01 (Tex. 2006)

(per curiam).
2

Accordingly, we grant Wiley’s motion. We vacate the trial court’s order because 

the nonsuit has rendered the case moot, and we dismiss the case for want of jurisdiction. See

Houston Mun. Emps. Pension Sys. v. Ferrell, 248 S.W.3d 151, 153, 157 (Tex. 2007); see also

Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(e).

__________________________________________

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: September 27, 2019
II 

Calendar No. 369 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3110 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2014 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To allow for the harvest of gull eggs by the Huna Tlingit 

people within Glacier Bay National Park in the State 

of Alaska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Huna Tlingit Tradi5 tional Gull Egg Use Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITED AUTHORIZATION FOR COLLECTION OF 

7 GULL EGGS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior (re9 ferred to in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’) may allow the 

10 collection by members of the Hoonah Indian Association 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3110 PCS 

1 of the eggs of glaucous-winged gulls (Laurus glaucescens) 

2 within Glacier Bay National Park (referred to in this Act 

3 as the ‘‘Park’’) not more frequently than twice each cal4 endar year at up to 5 locations within the Park, subject 

5 to any terms and conditions that the Secretary determines 

6 to be necessary. 

7 (b) APPLICABLE LAW.—For the purposes of sections 

8 203 and 816 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Con9 servation Act (16 U.S.C. 410hh–2, 3126), the collection 

10 of eggs of glaucous-winged gulls within the Park in ac11 cordance with subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 

12 use specifically permitted by that Act. 

13 (c) HARVEST PLAN.—The Secretary shall establish 

14 schedules, locations, and any additional terms and condi15 tions that the Secretary determines to be necessary for 

16 the harvesting of eggs of glaucous-winged gulls in the 

17 Park, based on an annual harvest plan to be prepared by 

18 the Secretary and the Hoonah Indian Association. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 369 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3110 

AN ACT 

To allow for the harvest of gull eggs by the Huna 

in the State of Alaska. Tlingit people within Glacier Bay National Park 

APRIL 29, 2014 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Reader’s Guide for Nicosulfuron CRM: Andrea Mojica

EPA/OCSPP/OPP/PRD

Reader’s Guide to Nicosulfuron Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0372

Publication Date: June 20, 2012

The Agency is providing the “Readers Guide” to allow the reader to more easily access and navigate the various entries cont ained in the nicosulfuron docket.

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents:

Docket Item 1. Federal Register Notice: Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened

for Review and Comment and Other Docket Actions.

Docket Item 2. Reader’s Guide to the Nicosu lfuron Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0372.

Docket Item 3. Nicosulfuron Preliminary Work Plan Registration Review: Initial Docket

Case 7227 June 2012.

Human Health Documents fo r Registration Review

Docket Item 4. Nicosulfuron Revised Human Health Assessment Scoping Document in Support of Registration Review. June 11, 2012.

This document evaluates the status of the human health assessments to determine the scope of work necessary to support the registration review of nicosulfuron.

Docket Item 5. Nicosulfuron: Review of Human Incidents. February 14, 2012.

This report summarizes the human health incide nts in the United States from 2006 to 2011 for nicosulfuron.

Environmental Fate and Effects Document for Registration Review

Docket Item 6. Registration Review: Preliminary Problem Formulation for Environmental Fate, Ecological Risk, Endangered Species, and Human Health Drinking Water Exposure Assessments for Nicosulfuron. June 7, 2012.

This document evaluates the status of the en vironmental fate and e ffects assessments to determine the scope of work necessary to s upport the registration re view of nicosulfuron.Use and Usage Information for Registration Review

Docket Item 7. BEAD Chemical Profile for Registrati on Review: Nicosulfuron (129008). November 30, 2011.

This document provides usage information and an overview of the pest management role of nicosulfuron.

Docket Item 8. PRD Label Data Report: Food/Feed & Non-Food/Non-Feed Uses Considered in Registration Revi ew Work Planning. Nicosulfuron (129008). December 1, 2011.

This table lists the food/feed and non-f ood/non- feed uses for nicosulfuron.

Docket Item 9. Nicosulfuron (129008) Screen Level Usage Analysis (SLUA). August 4,

2011.

This document provides estimates of nicosulf uron usage on agricultural crops in the United

States.
WHITING PETROLEUM
CORPORATION
SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 




		
Effective February 1, 2006

			Committee Service

		Board Service
	Audit
	Compensation
	Nominating
and Governance

	Annual Retainer	 	 		$36,000	 	 		 	 		 	 		 
	Restricted Stock, vesting over three years	 	 	 	1,800 shares	 	 		 	 		 	 		 
	Committee Chair Annual Retainer	 	 	 		 		$20,000	 		 $15,000	 		 $15,000	 
	Committee Chair Restricted Stock, vesting	 	 	 		 	 		 	 		 	 		 
	  over three years	 	 	 		 	 	    1,000	 	 	      750	 	 	      750	 
	Committee Member Annual Retainer	 	 	 		 		  $  5,000	 		  $  3,000	 		  $  3,000	 
	Meeting fee, including telephonic meetings of	 	 	 		 	 		 	 		 	 		 
	   over one hour	 	 		$  1,500	 		$  1,500	 		$  1,500	 		$  1,500	 
	Telephonic meetings of one hour or less	 	 		$     750	 		$     750	 		$     750	 		$     750	 









Non-employee directors are also
eligible to receive health insurance coverage from Whiting Petroleum Corporation.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, theChief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Tidelands Bancshares, Inc.(the “Company”), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of thiscertification:

 

1.               The annual report of the Company for theperiod ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert E. Coffee, Jr. |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert  E. Coffee, Jr.    |   |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer       |   |
|   | March 17, 2008            |   |
|   |                           |   |
|   |                           |   |
|   | /s/ Alan W. Jackson            |   |
|   | Alan  W. Jackson               |   |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer       |   |
|   | March 17, 2008            |   |

 

----
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-11498

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEMORRIS ADAMS, 

a.k.a. Mario, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00021-LAG-TQL-2

USCA11 Case: 22-11498 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 01/11/2023 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-11498

____________________

Before ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Jenifer Enterante Cummings, appointed counsel for 

DeMorris Adams in this appeal from his convictions and total 

sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and 

distribution of methamphetamine, has filed a motion to withdraw 

on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the 

entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit 

of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion 

to withdraw is GRANTED, and Adams’s conviction and sentence 

are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 22-11498 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 01/11/2023 Page: 2 of 2
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation and Benefits



 Exhibit 10.2 
 NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION 
 Non-Employee Director
Compensation and Benefits 
  

				
	 Description
	  	Amount
	 Attendance Fees (per meeting)
	  		
		
	 Board or Committee Meeting
	  	$	1,500
		
	 Annual Cash Retainer
	  		
		
	 Payable quarterly in arrears
	  	$	50,000
		
	 Audit Committee Retainer
	  		
		
	 Payable quarterly in arrears
	  	$	5,000
		
	 Lead Director Retainer
	  		
		
	 Payable quarterly in arrears
	  	$	15,000
		
	 Annual Award of Common Stock or Director Stock Units
	  	$	75,000

 On the day following election/re-election as a director by the stockholders or on the day
following appointment as a director by the Board, each non-employee director shall be entitled to receive Director Stock Units (“DSUs”) with respect to common stock of Newmont Mining Corporation having a fair market value as of the day
following election or appointment of U.S.$75,000. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each non-employee director may elect to receive the award in the form of shares of the Corporation’s common stock, in lieu of DSUs, in respect of any year upon
prior written notice to the Corporation’s Corporate Secretary. Such awards will be made, on terms and conditions as determined by the Board, to those non-employee directors so elected, re-elected or appointed. 
 Committee Chairman Retainers 
 The Chairman of each
standing committee of the Board will receive an annual cash retainer, paid quarterly in arrears, in the amount of $15,000 for the Chairman of the Audit Committee and $5,000 for the Chairman of each of the other committees. 







 Charitable Gift Programs 
  

			
	 Matching Charitable Gift Program
	  	
	 Qualified cultural or charitable organizations or hospitals
	  	$ 2,500 per year
	 Qualified educational organization
	  	$ 5,000 per year
	 Non-Matching Charitable Gift Program
	  	
	 Contribution to be made in your name by Newmont to a qualified educational or charitable organization
	  	$ 2,500 per year

 Retirement 
 On retirement, at any time after attaining age 65, a director who was serving on the Board on January 27, 1999, and who is not entitled to a pension under Newmont’s pension plan, and who has served for at
least ten consecutive years as a director of Newmont Mining Corporation or Newmont Gold Company, is entitled to be paid an annual sum of $50,000 for life. 
 Effective February 24, 2006 
  

 2
WCI Comments to US EPA concerning Subpart W 

Applicable Subpart W sections: the comments which follow concern two rule 

sections: 

1) §98.233(q) Leak detection and leaker emission factors, Equation W-18, 

2) §98.233(r) Population count and emission factors, Equation W-19. 

Issue: The variable GHGi for some sources is set equal to 1. This assumption is 

valid for CH4 but in the case of CO2, assuming a value of 1 will result in a 

significant overestimation of CO2 emissions. This is because the concentration 

of CO2 in sweet (processed) gas is typically around 1% (GHGi = 0.01), not 100% 

(GHGi = 1). 

Suggested regulation modifications: 

In Equations W-18 and W-19 where GHGi is defined, add language to require 

that reporters use the actual CO2 concentration in processed gas. 

Example: additional suggested language is shown in italics. 

§98.233(q) 

GHGi = For onshore natural gas processing facilities, concentration of GHG i, 

CH4 or CO2, in the total hydrocarbon of the feed natural gas; for other facilities 

listed in §98.230(a)(3) through (a)(8), GHGi equals 1 for CH4. Reporters shall 

use the concentration of CO2 in either processed natural gas or LNG for CO2

GHGi in these other facilities. 

§98.233(r) 

Similar changes in the definition of GHGi for CO2 would be required here as well.
#### Harbage, Appellee, *v.*Tracy, Aud., et al.; Bittinger, Speaker, Appellant. Harbage, Appellee, *v.*Tracy, Aud., Appellant, et al.

(Nos. 28061 and 28062

Decided March 27, 1940.)

*Mr. Gilbert Bettman*and *Mrs. Agnes B. Dickinson,*for appellee.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, *Mr. E. G. Schuessler*and *Mr. David M. Spriggs,*for Joseph Tracy, auditor of state. '

*Messrs. Eagleson & Laylin,*for J. Freer Bittinger, speaker of House of Representatives.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said causes.

*Appeals dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.