alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

      ( print page 62742)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         October 27, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 pm to 2:30 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate proposals.                    

*Place:*                         6100 Executive Blvd., 5th Floor, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hameed Khan, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health, and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 12, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-26867 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Amos ELLIOTT, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 22680.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 13, 1943.

No counsel for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for robbery by assault. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of fifteen years.

Since perfecting his appeal, appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified, requesting the privilege of withdrawing the same. The request is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion by the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1607

TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL, and minor child,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY; MCCLATCHY INVESTMENT COMPANY; 

MCCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS, INC.; THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY, d/b/a 

The Charlotte Observer; DOES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00166-FDW-DSC)

Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 22, 2022

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1607 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the court’s prior order denying McDaniel’s 

application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), and dismissing McDaniel’s civil action 

without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. The court denied McDaniel leave to 

proceed IFP and afforded her 21 days to pay the filing fee, which she did not. Because the 

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying McDaniel’s application to proceed IFP, 

see Dillard v. Liberty Loan Corp., 626 F.2d 363, 364 (4th Cir. 1980) (providing standard 

of review), and McDaniel did not advance a viable basis for the Rule 60(b) motion, we 

discern no error in the court’s order dismissing without prejudice McDaniel’s civil action 

for failing to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. McDaniel 

v. The McClatchy Co., No. 3:22-cv-00166-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. May 23, 2022). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1607 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.01 ** 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Swank, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”), the undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

| Dated: May 14, 2009 | /s/ John Tulin                      |  |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------|--|
|                | John Tulin, Chief Executive Officer |

| Dated: May 14, 2009 | /s/ Jerold R. Kassner                                     |  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--|
|                | Jerold R. Kassner, Executive Vice President and Treasurer |
|                     | (Chief Financial Officer)                                 |

                                                                                  

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Swank, Inc. and will be retained by Swank, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

19
# ........ ____________________ SERVED: JUNE 4, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC IN THE MATTEROF COMAIR, INC. DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0318 

### (Civil PenaltyAction) 

### NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011S0271015)

### hasbeenassignedto Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings andothercommunications regardingthisproceeding shallbe served ontheJudge, the FAA

### Hearing Docket, andthe other persons onthe attached ServiceList.

Attachment - Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL . ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. · Washington, DC 20591 Attention: · Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 Ryan Gumm, VP of Flight Operations Comair, Inc., Respondent 82 Comair Blvd. Erlanger, KY 41018 James McClain Delta Air Lines, Inc.

P.O. Box 20706 Dept. 982 Atlanta, GA 30320

ONE COPY

Robert P. Silverberg, Respondent's Counsel .1101 30th Street,N.W. Suite 120 . Washington, DC 20007 Christopher R. Stevenson, Complainant's Counsel Office of the Regional Counsel,·AS0;.7 Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region 1701 Columbia Avenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20 U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536

Docket No. FAA-2014-0318 (Civil Penalty Action) 1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For serv'ice in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal · Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. -2-
Exhibit 10.3

Schedule 2.1 to the Directors Deferred Compensation and Benefits Trust Agreement

Benefit Plans and Other Arrangements Subject to Trust

(1) Sunoco, Inc. Directors Deferred Compensation Plan I;

(2) Sunoco, Inc. Directors Deferred Compensation Plan II;

(3) The entire funding for all the Indemnification Agreements with the directors set forth below shall be Five Million Dollars
($5,000,000.00) in the aggregate upon a Potential Change in Control, and an amount upon a Change in Control calculated on the basis of the Indemnification Agreements with the following directors:



|                              |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | 
|(a)    Robert J.
Darnall4     |  | 
|(b)    John G.
Drosdick1      |  | 
|(c)    Gary W. Edwards        |  | 
|(d)    Ursula O. Fairbairn    |  | 
|(e)    Thomas P.
Gerrity5     |  | 
|(f)     Rosemarie B. Greco    |  | 
|(g)    John P. Jones, III     |  | 
|(h)    James G. Kaiser        |  | 
|(i)     R. Anderson
Pew2      |  | 
|(j)     G. Jackson
Ratcliffe3 |  | 
|(k)    John W. Rowe           |  | 
|(l)     John K. Wulff         |  | 

(4) Benefits payable to former directors of the Company (or their beneficiaries) in pay status as
of the date of termination of the Sunoco, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Retirement Plan.





NOTES:

| | 1. | Mr. Drosdick resigned as a Director of Sunoco, Inc., effective December 31, 2008.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Mr. Pew did not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting on May 7, 2009, due to Sunoco, Inc.s mandatory retirement policy for directors.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Mr. Ratcliffe did not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting on May 7, 2009, due to Sunoco, Inc.s mandatory retirement policy for directors.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | Mr. Darnall will not be standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting on May 6, 2010, due to Sunoco, Inc.s mandatory retirement policy for directors.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 5. | Dr. Gerrity will not be standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting on May 6, 2010, and will be retiring from the Sunoco, Inc. Board at that time.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John R. CLUCK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 76-2895

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 16, 1976.

*196Roland E. Dahlin, II, Fed. Public Defender, Karen K. Friedman, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Houston, Tex., Juan E. Gavito, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Brownsville, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Edward B. McDonough, Jr., U. S. Atty., Anna E. Stool, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before AINSWORTH, CLARK and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see *Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al.,*5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

John R. Cluck appeals from his conviction for importing a stolen firearm into the United States from Mexico. He testified in his own behalf, attempting to explain that the firearm was not stolen. On cross-examination the Assistant United State Attorney asked him, over defense objection:

> “Now you are the same John Rexford Cluck that was charged in Beaumont, Texas for unlawfully carrying a weapon on 12-31-75?”

> “Yes sir.”

> “Are you the same John Rexford Cluck that was charged in Beaumont, Texas, on 12-31-75 for possession of stolen property?”

> “No sir.”

The district court then instructed the jury that the questions were asked for the sole purpose of testing the credibility of the witness.

The government then called as a rebuttal witness a Beaumont policeman who testified that appellant was arrested in Beaumont on December 31, 1975, for possession of stolen property. There is no evidence of the disposition of either charge.

Appellant contends that it was error to admit, for impeachment purposes, evidence of his arrest and accusation of crimes for which there was no evidence of convictions. The government has filed no brief, but it has advised this Court that it does not oppose the appellant’s request for reversal and a new trial.

It is error to attack a witness’s credibility by using extrinsic evidence of his conduct that has not resulted in conviction of a crime. Fed.R.Evid. 608(b) (1975). The government makes no argument that the error here was harmless. We therefore hold that permitting the testimony of the Beaumont policeman to be introduced was reversible error. *Cf., United States v. Musgrave,*483 F.2d 327, 338 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*414 U.S. 1023, 94 S.Ct. 447, 38 L.Ed.2d 315 (1973).

The conviction is reversed and the cause remanded to the district court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 243

EX PA R TE C A LV I N JAM A L JO N ES , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 6 3 4 3 9 I N T HE 2 6 4 DI S TR I CT COURT TH FROM BELL CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty and wa s convicted of burg lary

of a ha bit a tio n and sen te nc e d to te n y e a rs ’ i mpr iso nme nt. He did no t a pp e a l his conviction. Ap pli c a nt c on te nd s th at hi s p le a wa s re nd e re d in vo lun tary be c a us e Ap pli c a nt p le a de d g uil ty pursuant to an a g ree ment that he would be se nt to b o o t ca m p . Ap plicant was ne ver g iven the opportunity

to attend boot camp . The trial court deter mined, and the r ecor d ref

lects, that Applica

nt’s2

plea wa s pursuant to an a g ree ment that he wo u l d b e sent to boot camp, which w as not followed throug h no fault of Applica nt. The trial cour

t rec ommends g ranting relief
. Relief is g rante d. The judg ment in Cause No. 63439 in the 264 J udicial District Court of th B e ll County

is s e t a sid e , a

nd Ap pli c a nt is re mand e d to the c us tod y of the sh e ri ff

of B e ll County

to
a ns we r t he c ha rg e s a s se t out in

the ind ic tme nt. Copies of this opinion s h al l b e s en tt o t h e T ex as De p ar t m en to f C ri m i n al J u s t i ce
– C o rr ec t ional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Octobe r 21, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SERGIO MEDINA

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3005

[ October 26, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; James W. McCann

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09CF000901A

.

Sergio Medina, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, T AYLOR and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### COFFEE v. STATE.

No. 23366.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 29, 1946.

Jimmie MacNicoll, of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*779KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the failure to stop and render aid. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment and all other procedural matters appear to he regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Statement of Chief Financial Officer Furnished
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the “Company”).
 
 This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”).
 
 By execution of this statement, I certify that:
 
 A)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
 
 B)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
 
 
 
 March 14, 2011                                                                          /s/ Gary F. Hoskins
 Dated                                                                          Gary F. Hoskins
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Dennis OBrien, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Silver Mines, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting for the Registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within this entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 11, 2008

By:      /s/ Dennis OBrien



Dennis OBrien, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer