alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GOTTSCHALK v. STATE.

No. 25729.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 7, 1952.

Dally & Alexander, by Jack Alexander,. Borger, E. T. Miller, Amarillo, for appellant.

Robert G. Gallaway, Dist. Atty., Borger,. George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction under the fondling statute, Art. 535d, Vernon’s P.C., with punishment assessed at ten years in the penitentiary.

The decision, Tex.Cr.App., 248 S.W.2d 473 is applicable and controlling here, and' will be read in connection with this opinion.

Here, the prosecuting witness Hatfield, a boy, lacked only about a month of being fourteen years of age. He lived about a block and a half from the appellant in the same community with other teenage boys including those specifically named and referred to in the other opinion. He heard the boys “talking how nice he (appellant) was, so I asked one of the boys to-introduce me: so David Reese took me over there.” This introduction occurred on May 23, 1951, or about two weeks prior to the commission of the offense charged. Afterward, Hatfield made frequent visits in appellant’s home. On one occasion, his father accompanied him, at which time appellant took the boy’s picture.

At about five o’clock the afternoon of June 6, 1951, Hatfield and .Reese went to appellant’s home., Reese went home shortly thereafter, and Holder, another boy,, came into the house, but stayed only a short while. Hatfield was seated on the divan with appellant, looking at comic books-After a time, appellant showed him a book containing photographs of a nude woman and also some cartoon books. Appellant then inquired of Hatfield relative to his sex life, asking him if he “had any hairs.” Hatfield asked appellant if “he wanted fo-see” and thereupon, at appellant’s suggestion, pulled down his trousers. Then appellant told the boy to “come on to the bedroom,” where appellant fondled Hatfield’s sex organ. Hatfield then left to go home, and made no mention of the occur*477rence to his parents or to anyone else until about the time of appellant’s arrest some twelve days thereafter. Hatfield admitted that as he was leaving appellant’s home after the act mentioned, he agreed with appellant that they were “still buddies.”

The foregoing facts, upon which the conviction of appellant rests, are from the testimony of Hatfield, alone.

The similarity between the facts here presented and those in the other case against appellant is apparent. In fact, here, there appears to be more testimony of Hatfield’s participation in and consent to the unlawful act than that of the witness in the other case. Under the authorities cited and the conclusion reached in the other case, the conclusion is also here expressed that the witness Hatfield was an accomplice and that his testimony would have had to be corroborated in order for the conviction to be sustained.

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court
##### 



Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Annual Report of CSK Auto Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ending
February 1, 2004 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d -14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code.

Maynard L. Jenkins, the Chief Executive Officer and Don W. Watson, the Chief
Financial Officer of CSK Auto Corporation, each certifies that to the best of
their knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of CSK Auto
Corporation.



|/s/ Maynard L.
Jenkins  |  | April 14,
2004
|----------------------- |  | --------------
|                        |  |               
|Maynard L. Jenkins      |  |               
|Chief Executive Officer |  |               
|                        |  |               
|                        |  |               
|/s/ Don W. Watson       |  | April 14,
2004
|                        |  |               
|Don W. Watson           |  |               
|Chief Financial Officer |  |               

Page 61
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

For the following periods the registrant had no securities that were dilutive
for the calculation of earnings per share.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Weighted average number of
Summary from unaudited             Basic and diluted loss            basic and diluted common
financial statements                     per common share            stock shares outstanding
----------------------             ----------------------      ------------------------------
<S>                                <C>                         <C>
Six months ended 11/30/2000                (0.08)                          12,428,043

Six months ended 11/30/1999                (0.06)                          10,145,153
</TABLE>
1 

### Werner, Christopher Subject: Feb. 24 Interagency call with OMB and other Federal agencies on Regional Haze Rule Revisions Location: RTP-C500C-Max20/RTP-Bldg-C Start: Wed 2/24/2016 3:00 PM End: Wed 2/24/2016 4:00 PM Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Meeting organizer Organizer: Werner, Christopher Required Attendees: Jones, Rhea; Lorang, Phil; Beaver, Melinda; Marks, Matthew; Anderson, Lea; VanLare, Paula; Greenglass, Nora; aaron_l_szabo@omb.eop.gov; Wood, Anna; Smith, Kristi Resources: RTP-C500C-Max20/RTP-Bldg-C Categories: Regional Haze



### Materials attached.
#### MARSHALL et al. v. WALTERS.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 5, 1954.

Earl R. Cooper, Salyersville, for appellants.

Marcus Mann, Salyersville, for appellee.

MORRIS, Commissioner.

This appeal is by the Board of Education and County Superintendent from a judgment directing them to grant appellee a continuing contract to teach in the high school. The Court- overruled appellants’ demurrer; they declined to plead further, and the Court granted the relief sought by appellee. Walters’ petition failed to allege that his contract specified the school and class of position in which he was to be employed. Precisely the same situation existed as to appellee here in Marshall v. Conley, Ky., 258 S.W.2d 911, wherein we held that the school authorities could transfer a teacher from one school or class of position to another, if the teacher’s contract did not specify as above stated.

Counsel for both parties agree that this case is a “companion” to the Conley case, and counsel for appellee has lodged with this record a memorandum declining to file brief because of our adverse decision in the Conley case. We reversed that case with direction to the Court to set aside the judgment and overruling order, and enter an order sustaining appellants’ demurrer. A like order will be entered and issued in this case.

Judgment reversed.
ACCEPTED

01-15-00188-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

9/11/2015 12:31:36 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/11/2015 12:31:36 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 1, 2014

t0325

Order 

Clerk

April 1, 2014

148062

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148062

COA: 311042 

Sanilac CC: 12-006940-FC

JOSEPH LEE BROCKITT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 26, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 This certification is provided pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, and accompanies Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 of
Horizon Offshore, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report). I, David W. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ David W. Sharp David W. Sharp
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
April 28, 2005
Affected Class I Areas - Number of Deciviews by Which Baselines Exceed Natural Conditions

Montana Class I Area

2000-

2004 

Baseline 

(dv)

2064 

Natural 

Conditio

ns (dv)

Difference between 

baseline and 

natural conditions 

(dv)

2000-

2004 

Baseline 

(dv)

2064 

Natural 

Conditions 

(dv)

Anaconda-Pintler WA 13.41 7.43 5.98 2.58 1.12

Bob Marshall WA 14.48 7.73 6.75 3.85 1.48

Cabinet Mountains WA 14.09 7.52 6.57 3.62 1.48

Gates of the Mountains 

WA 11.29 6.38 4.91 1.71 0.32

Glacier NP 22.26 9.18 13.08 7.22 2.42

Medicine Lake WA 17.72 7.89 9.83 7.26 2.96

Mission Mountain WA 14.48 7.73 6.75 3.85 1.48

Red Rock Lakes WA 11.76 6.44 5.32 2.58 0.43

Scapegoat WA 14.48 7.73 6.75 3.85 1.48

Selway-Bitterroot WA 13.41 7.43 5.98 2.58 1.12

U.L. Bend WA 15.14 8.16 6.98 4.75 2.45

Yellowstone NP 11.76 6.44 5.32 2.58 0.43

20% Worst Days 20% Best Days
tural Conditions

Difference 

between baseline 

and natural 

conditions (dv)

1.46

2.37

2.14

1.39

4.8

4.3

2.37

2.15

2.37

1.46

2.3

2.15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1744786
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   297141
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     724125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6719459
<PP&E>                                        13269985
<DEPRECIATION>                                  752125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                21261309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1702789
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       2500000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    12462638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  21261309
<SALES>                                       14525872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              14768113
<CGS>                                         12015435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 12616310
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                600875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              200112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2151803
<INCOME-TAX>                                    817685
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1334118
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1334118
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0010

_________________ IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: DAWN E. PHILLIPS,

Petitioner and Appellee, and FRANK M. BUCKNUM,

Respondent and Appellant. O R D E R

_ ________________ Counsel for Appellant has filed an unopposed motion for extension to file an opening brief , because the parties have not been able to participate in mediation . Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extens ion is GRANTE D. Appellant has until June 12, 2020, within which to file the opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 6 2020

04/06/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                       3,262,138
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  564,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                    70,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,908,002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,576,578
<PP&E>                                       4,833,634
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,084,129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,345,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,330,516
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       129,454
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,635,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,345,305
<SALES>                                      3,680,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,851,351
<CGS>                                        1,598,165
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,749,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,447
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,074
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,913,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (478,405)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,435,216)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,435,216)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.07)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CO-930;1430-ET; COC-1661] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice sets forth the schedule and agenda for a forthcoming meeting on the Fish and Wildlife Service proposal for expansion of the Browns Park National Wildlife Refuge. This meeting will provide the opportunity for public involvement concerning this proposed action as required by regulation. All comments will be considered when a final determination is made on whether this land should be withdrawn. 

# DATES:

Meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 28, 2000, from 12:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. This will be an open house type of meeting with representatives of Fish and Wildlife Service and of the Bureau of Land Management to answer questions and accept written or oral comments or objections. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Craig City Hall, 300 W. 4th Street, Craig, Colorado 81625. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Doris E. Chelius, BLM Colorado State Office, (303) 239-3706. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Notice of Proposed Withdrawal for the Browns Park National Wildlife Expansion which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 11, 2000, (65 FR 42720, 42721), is hereby modified to schedule a public meeting as provided by 43 U.S.C. 1714, and 43 CFR 2310.                 

This meeting will be open to all interested persons, those who desire to be heard in person and those who desire to submit written comments on this subject. Comments can also be submitted to the Colorado State Director, Bureau of Land Management, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7093. 

Herbert K. Olson,

Acting Realty Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-27114 Filed 10-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26681]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-325-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Technical Conference

October 12, 2000.
    On June 15, 2000, Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG) filed in 
compliance with Order No. 637. A technical conference to discuss the 
various issues raised by CIG's filing was held on October 3, 2000.
    Take notice that a second technical conference to discuss the issue 
of segmentation on CIG's system, and remaining issues raised by CIG's 
filing, will be held Thursday, October 26, 2000, at 9 am in a room to 
be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    All interested persons and Staff are permitted to attend.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26681 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Burrell, Appellant.

(No. 28050

Decided March 6, 1940.)

*Mr. Robert E.*Fuller, prosecuting attorney, for appellee.

*Mr. Fred R.*Hover, for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Williams and Matthias, JJ., concur.
#### Bauer, Appellant, *v.*The Chesapeake *&*Ohio Ry. Co., Appellee.

(No. 27755

Decided November 15, 1939.)

*Messrs. Daily, Moats S Wills,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Bannon, Bannon <& Lynn*and *Mr. W. H. Middleton,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                          WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
                                   FORM 10-KSB
                          YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Cynthia A. Mahl, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                   /s/ Cynthia A. Mahl
                                   Cynthia A. Mahl
                                   Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
                                   March 30, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

# AGENCY:

General Services Administration.

# ACTION:

Meeting notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the President's Commission on the Celebration of Women in American History will hold an open meeting from 1:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Wednesday, November 15, 2000, at the George Washington University, Marvin Center Room 403.

# PURPOSE:

To discuss the Commission's final report and how to elaborate its message to the President.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Martha Davis (202) 501-0705, Assistant to the Associate Administrator for Communications, General Services Administration. Also, inquiries may be sent to                         *martha.davis@gsa.gov.*

Dated: October 17, 2000.

Beth Newburger,

Associate Administrator for Communications.

[FR Doc. 00-27173  Filed 10-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 17, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00532

- CV

FRANKLIN ADVISERS, INC. , on behalf of certain investment funds managed by it; Oz Management LP, on behalf of certain investment funds managed by it, Oz Management II LP, on behalf of certain investment funds managed by it; and Benefit Street Partners, LLC

, Appellant s

v.

IHEARTCOMMUNICATIONS INC. , f/k/a Clear Channel Communication, Inc., Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- CI

- 04006 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellants ’ and appellee's joint motion to correct reporter's record by striking erroneously included exhibit is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of February, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court