alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001051191
<NAME> RAM ENERGY INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,248,421
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,147,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                   438,819
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,795,874
<PP&E>                                      76,196,265
<DEPRECIATION>                            (15,622,566)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,727,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,368,076
<BONDS>                                     62,127,442
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,270
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,010,258)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,727,369
<SALES>                                     23,736,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,815,552
<CGS>                                        6,769,028
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,928,067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                91,303
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,158,955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,188,810)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,188,810)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,188,810)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

### Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

### As Adopted Pursuant to

### Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

---

In connection with the quarterly report of Pathmark
Stores,  Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended  July 30,
2005,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
Report),  I, John T.  Standley,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,
hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the
Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the
information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  represents,  in all  material  respects,
the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A  signed  original  of  this  written  statement
required  by  Section  906,  or  other  document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or
otherwise  adopting the  signature  that appears in typed form within the  electronic
version of this  written  statement  required  by Section  906,  has been  provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |                      | /s/ John T. Standley                                     
| | -------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:    Title:Date: | John T. StandleyChief Executive Officer
September 8, 2005
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3060 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

232 Southwest Johnson Avenue in Burleson, Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant 

William Moody Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2013 

Mr. WILLIAMS (for himself, Mr. BARTON, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. BURGESS, 

Mr. CARTER, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. 

FLORES, Mr. GOHMERT, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. HALL, Mr. HENSARLING, 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. OLSON, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SMITH of 

Texas, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. 

CASTRO of Texas, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. AL

GREEN of Texas, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. HINOJOSA, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. O’ROURKE, Mr. 

VEASEY, and Mr. VELA) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 232 Southwest Johnson Avenue in Burleson, 

Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant William Moody Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3060 IH

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT WILLIAM MOODY POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 232 Southwest Johnson Avenue 

5 in Burleson, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Sergeant William Moody Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant William 

11 Moody Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3011 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3011

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to require any person 
subject to accounting principles or standards under the securities laws 
 to show all transactions of such person on the balance sheet of such 
                                person.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2013

 Mr. Capuano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to require any person 
subject to accounting principles or standards under the securities laws 
 to show all transactions of such person on the balance sheet of such 
                                person.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nothing Off Balance Sheet Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. ALL TRANSACTIONS REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN ON BALANCE SHEET.

    (a) In General.--In establishing accounting principles or standards 
for purposes of the securities laws (as defined in section 3(a) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a))), the Securities and 
Exchange Commission shall require any person subject to such principles 
or standards to show all transactions of such person on the balance 
sheet of such person.
    (b) Regulations.--The Securities and Exchange Commission shall 
promulgate regulations to implement subsection (a) not later than the 
date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered March 20, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00195-CV

AEG POWER SOLUTIONS GMBH, Appellant/Cross-Appellee

V.

CREATION TECHNOLOGIES TEXAS LLC, Appellee/Cross-Appellant

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-15065

ORDER

This appeal and cross-appeal stem from separate trial court orders in the same underlying 

suit. The underlying suit was filed by Creation Technologies Texas LLC against AEG Power 

Solutions GMBH (“AEG Germany”), AEG Power Solutions B.V. (“AEG”), and others. The 

appeal challenges the denial of AEG Germany’s special appearance; the cross-appeal challenges 

the granting of AEG’s special appearance. AEG Germany did not request the reporter’s record, 

and its brief on the merits was timely filed within twenty days of the filing of the clerk’s record. 

Creation Technologies’ combined appellee’s and cross-appellant’s brief is currently due April 2, 

2019. 
Because different orders and different parties are at issue in the appeal and cross-appeal, 

Creation Technologies has moved to separate the appeals. AEG Germany and AEG oppose the 

motion.

We GRANT the motion and DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to assign a new appellate 

cause number to Creation Technologies’ appeal. The new appeal shall be styled “Creation 

Technologies Texas LLC v. AEG Power Solutions B.V.” As the clerk’s record filed in this 

appeal contains a copy of the order granting AEG’s special appearance, we further DIRECT the 

Clerk of the Court to include in the new appeal a copy of the clerk’s record. 

We note the docketing statement filed by Creation Technologies reflects it requested the 

reporter’s record February 14, 2019. As of this date, however, the record has not been filed. 

Accordingly, we ORDER Diane L. Robert, Official Court Reporter of the 14th Judicial District 

Court, to file the record no later than April 1, 2019. The record shall be filed in the new appeal. 

Creation Technologies’ brief in the new appeal shall be filed within twenty days of the 

filing of the reporter’s record. Its brief in this appeal remains due April 2nd.

We DIRECT the clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Robert and the 

parties. 

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5                    
<LEGEND>                                                       
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>                                                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000    
                                                               
<S>                                        <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS                 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997          
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1997           
<CASH>                                         133,521            
<SECURITIES>                                         0            
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,168            
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,022             
<INVENTORY>                                    249,382             
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               716,614             
<PP&E>                                         706,280             
<DEPRECIATION>                                 356,282            
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,282,614             
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          255,883             
<BONDS>                                        150,923             
<COMMON>                                       230,101             
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0             
<PREFERRED>                                          0             
<OTHER-SE>                                     559,011             
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,282,614             
<SALES>                                              0             
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               481,274             
<CGS>                                                0             
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  280,001             
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0             
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0             
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,435             
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,874             
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,158             
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,716            
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0             
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0             
<CHANGES>                                            0             
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,716             
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80          
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80             
                                                               

</TABLE>
#### DOUGLAS BUSTER *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

*David B. Rozwaski,*in support of the petition.

*Richard F. Jacobson,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided May 15, 1998

The petitioner Douglas Buster’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 910 (AC 17374), is denied.
#### X-Cel Dairy, Inc., Appellant, *v.*City of Akron, Appellee.

(No. 27851

Decided February 7, 1940.)

*Messrs. Buckingham, Doolittle S Thomas,*for appellant.

*Mr. Wade DeWoody,*director of law, and *Mr. Nathan Koplin,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
#### SCOTT v. STATE.

No. 24428.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 22, 1949.

W. J. Alexander, Caldwell, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for carrying a pistol, with a penalty of 30 days in jail.

*609Both the complaint and information charge that appellant “ * * * did then and there unlawfully have on or about his person a pistol.” The appeal attacks the sufficiency of the complaint and information because of the use of the disjunctive conjunction “or” instead of “and.”

This question has been passed upon so many times by this Court that it would seem unnecessary to cite authorities to sustain appellant’s contention. We said in Wilson v. State, 209 S.W.2d 598:

“An indictment which charges that the accused did carry on or about his person a pistol does not charge the unlawful carrying of a pistol, because the use of the word ‘or’ rather than the word ‘and’ renders such allegation uncertain and the indictment defective. Branch’s P.C. Sec. 967; Evage v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 318, 125 S.W.2d 295; Jenkins v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 515, 159 S.W.2d 885.”

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.
#### James CLAY, Committee for Clyde Hutchinson, Incompetent, Appellant, v. John CLARKE, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 17, 1954.

William R. Redwine, Sandy Hook, for appellant.

Diederich & Lycan, Ashland, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal ‘ from a judgment of the Boyd Circuit Court which dismissed the complaint, because the judgment declaring Clyde Hutchinson to be incompetent, and the order appointing a committee for Hutchinson, were both void. The questions raised, authorities cited and the applicable law have been carefully considered by the court, and we find the judgment entered by the circuit court dismissing the complaint was correct.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	5
<LEGEND>	
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE	
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS	
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	
</LEGEND>	
<MULTIPLIER>                                    	1,000
       	
<S>	                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   	6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         	MAY-30-1998	
<PERIOD-END>                              	NOV-29-1997	
<CASH>                                        	137,232
<SECURITIES>                                        	0	
<RECEIVABLES>                                 	282,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                    	3,421
<INVENTORY>                                   	229,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              	721,504
<PP&E>                                        	742,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                	371,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              	1,319,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         	325,423
<BONDS>                                       	151,006
<COMMON>                                      	228,387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               	0	
<PREFERRED>                                         	0	
<OTHER-SE>                                    	524,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                	1,319,883
<SALES>                                             	0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            	1,010,320
<CGS>                                               	0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 	617,052
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    	0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    	0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              	4,318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 	8,207
<INCOME-TAX>                                    	2,708
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             	5,499
<DISCONTINUED>                                      	0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     	0
<CHANGES>                                           	0
<NET-INCOME>                                    	5,499
<EPS-PRIMARY>	                                    0.11 
<EPS-DILUTED>	                                    0.11 
        	

</TABLE>
[Cite as State v. Brinker, 2017-Ohio-5504.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 BUTLER COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2016-07-129 

 : D E C I S I O N 

 - vs - 6/26/2017 

 : 

BRYAN LEE BRINKER, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. CR2011-04-0501 

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Lina N. Alkamhawi, Government 

Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011-6057, for plaintiff-appellee 

Scott N. Blauvelt, 315 South Monument, Hamilton, OH 45011, for defendant-appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of 

the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Bryan Brinker, has filed a brief with this court 

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that 

a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the 
Butler CA2016-07-129 

trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be 

predicated; (2) lists five potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 

744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to 

determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant 

on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief 

and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that 

it is wholly frivolous. 

HENDRICKSON, P.J., S. POWELL and RINGLAND, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

      ( print page 63104)    
In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meetings of the Advisory Panel for Methods, Cross-Directorate and Science and Society (1760):

*Date/Time:*                     December 4-5, 2000, 8 a.m.-5 p.m.                

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 920, Arlington, VA.                

*Contact Person:*                     Bonney H. Sheahan, Program Director for Cross Directorate Programs; National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8763.                

*Agenda:*                     To review and evaluate REU proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                

*Date/Time:*                     December 13-15, 2000; 8 a.m.-5 p.m.                

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm. 365/920, Arlington, VA.                

*Contact Person:*                     Paul Chapin, Program Director for Cross Directorate Programs; National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-1733.                

*Agenda:*                     To review and evaluate Infrastructure proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                

# TYPE OF MEETINGS:

Closed.

# PURPOSE OF MEETINGS:

To provide advice and recommendations concerning support for research proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support.

# REASON FOR CLOSING:

The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

Dated: October 16, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-26985 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M