alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the annual report of Qiao Xing Universal Telephone,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Rui Lin Wu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that: (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ RUI LIN WU
Rui Lin Wu
Chief Executive OfficerJune 30, 2004
Exhibit 8.1

List of Significant Subsidiaries

The following table lists the Registrant's significant subsidiaries, as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X, as at
December 31, 2003. The table includes the legal name of the subsidiary and its jurisdiction of incorporation

NameCall Tel Corporation (Panama)GFN Comunicaciones, S. A. (Dominican Republic)TCN Dominicana, S. A. (Dominican Republic)TRICOM Centroamérica, S. A. (Panama)TRICOM Latinoamérica, S. A. (Cayman Islands)TRICOM USA, Inc. (Delaware)


---



QuickLinks
#### HALL et al. v. RESERVE LIFE INS. CO.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 15, 1954.

*934V. R. Bentley, Pikeville, for appellants.

Hobson & Scott, Pikeville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants instituted this action against the appellee to recover some $700 on a medical benefits and accident policy. The insuring clause of the policy contained the following exclusion provision:

> “(b) resulting from sickness which originates while this policy is in effect and more than fifteen days after the date hereof, hereinafter referred to as such sickness; * *

The trial judge gave a peremptory instruction in favor of the appellee because the operation showed that Mrs. Hall’s disease was one which could not have originated much less than a year before the policy was issued. We think that ruling was correct.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32
 Certification pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: February 27, 2009
    
    /s/ John R. KoelmelJohn R. KoelmelPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: February 27, 2009
    
    /s/ Michael W. HarringtonMichael W. HarringtonChief Financial Officer
Director Compensation


    Exhibit
      10.1

    


    


    Compensation
      Summary

    (As
      reported in The Hershey Company’s

    Current
      Report on Form 8-K, filed

    December
      7, 2005)

    


    


    On
      December 6, 2005, the Board of Directors of The Hershey Company approved an
      increase in non-employee director compensation effective January 1, 2006. The
      increase was approved following a review of competitive data that disclosed
      the
      need to adjust director compensation upward to be at the mid-point of
      compensation paid to directors at a peer group of food, beverage and consumer
      packaged goods companies the Board uses for benchmarking non-employee director
      compensation.

    


    The
      charts below show non-employee director compensation in 2005 and as approved
      for
      2006. 

    


    2005
      Directors’ Compensation

    
      	
              Annual
                Retainer

            	
              $55,000

            
	
              Annual
                Restricted Stock Unit Grant

            	
              $80,000

            
	
              Annual
                Retainer for Committee Chairs

            	
              $  5,000

            


    

    


    2006
      Directors’ Compensation

    
      	
              Annual
                Retainer

            	
              $ 
                65,000

            
	
              Annual
                Restricted Stock Unit Grant

            	
              $100,000

            
	
              Annual
                Retainer for Committee Chairs (except Audit Committee
                Chair)

            	
              $   
                5,000

            
	
              Annual
                Retainer for Audit Committee Chair

            	
              $ 
                10,000

            


    

    


    Except
      as
      provided above, all other terms and conditions regarding director compensation
      remain as outlined in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting
      of Stockholders, filed March 10, 2005. Information regarding director
      compensation will also be provided in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2006
      Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed in March
      2006.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00175-CR

MANUEL PENA

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2009-CR-1438-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 25, 2015
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Statement      of Chief Financial Officer Furnished**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|  | A) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))                and |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | B) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the                Report. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |                                                                     |                                                   |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                                |                                              |
| March                14, 2008 |                                                                     | /s/ Gary                F.                Hoskins |
| Date:                    | Gary                  F. HoskinsChief                  Financial Officer |
|                          |                                                                     |

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3048 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study of economically 

beneficial uses of the rights-of-way associated with certain highways, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2013 

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study 

of economically beneficial uses of the rights-of-way associated with certain highways, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maximize Our High5 ways Act of 2013’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3048 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY OF ECONOMICALLY BENEFICIAL USES OF 

2 THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY ASSOCIATED WITH CER3 TAIN HIGHWAYS. 

4 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Transportation shall 

5 conduct a study of economically beneficial uses of the 

6 rights-of-way associated with highways constructed with 

7 Federal assistance, which shall include— 

8 (1) the identification of economically beneficial 

9 activities that may be carried out with respect to 

10 those rights-of-way to ensure that— 

11 (A) those rights-of-way are used in the 

12 most economically beneficial manner compatible 

13 with transportation purposes; and 

14 (B) economic underutilization of those 

15 rights-of-way is minimized to the extent pos16 sible; 

17 (2) an analysis of the costs and benefits, includ18 ing with respect to safety, of carrying out the eco19 nomically beneficial activities identified under para20 graph (1); 

21 (3) an analysis of barriers to carrying out the 

22 economically beneficial activities identified under 

23 paragraph (1); and 

24 (4) an analysis of the revenue that may be gen25 erated by carrying out the economically beneficial 

26 activities identified under paragraph (1) and how 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3048 IH

1 that revenue may be used to support transportation 

2 infrastructure. 

3 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

4 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 

5 Congress and make available to States a report on the 

6 results of the study conducted under subsection (a), which 

7 shall include legislative recommendations based on the re8 sults. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            40601
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           235
<OTHER-SE>                                      (40836)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 13044
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (13044)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (13044)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)


</TABLE>
#### JARMON v. STATE.

No. 22104.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 6, 1942.

Rehearing Denied June 3, 1942.

*112Alex P. Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

■ Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., . of Austin, for the State.’ ■

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Driving an automobile on a public highway while intoxicated is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $50.

A policeman of the City of Tyler, who arrested appellant while driving his automobile upon one of the streets of that city, testified that, at the time, he smelled the odor of, alcohol on appellant’s breath; and that he saw and observed appellant’s conduct and conversation, by reason of which he was able to say that appellant was under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

Almost a full gallon of wine was found in appellant’s car.

Appellant, testifying as a witness in his own behalf, denied that he was drunk or under the influence of intoxicating liquor at the time. He said that the wine found in the car belonged to another person, and that he (appellant) had not drunk any of it. He admitted that, several hours before the arrest, he drank one bottle of beer.

The disputed issue of fact thus presented was for the jury; it was within their province to accept the testimony of the policeman. The facts are, therefore, sufficient to support the conviction.

The sole complaint here presented is to the trial court’s failure to give appellant’s special requested charge, the effect of which was that the jury be instructed that, if they entertained a reasonable doubt as to whether the appellant was drunk or under the influence of intoxicating liquor at the time, they should acquit him, even though they might believe that he had been drinking.

We perceive no legal distinction between such a charge and that given by the trial court, wherein the jury were instructed that, if they entertained a reasonable doubt as to whether the appellant was drunk or under the influence of intoxicating liquor, at the time, they should acquit him.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by' the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0242%205(e)/p120242.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:05:20 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0242 Focus Ready Draft 4/9/2012 ENGINEER: Avcin \ JD \ JASfile:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0242%205(e)/p120242.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:05:20 PM] SAT (concerns) (03/30/2012): Migration to groundwater: PMN negl; Incin Pdt rapid PBT rating: P3B2T2 PMN: P3B1T1, Health 1-2, Eco 1 // Incin Pdt: P3B2T2, Health 2, Eco, 3 Health: 2 Drinking Water, Inhalation, Inhalation for per-F acid Eco: 3 No releases to Water OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0242%205(e)/p120242.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:05:20 PM] EXPOSURE -BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0242file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0242%205(e)/p120242.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:05:20 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0242file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0242%205(e)/p120242.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:05:20 PM]file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0242%205(e)/p120242.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:05:20 PM]
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 10331 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JASON DAVON LAURENSON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:18

- CR

- 6

- 38

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Jason Davon Laurenson has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Laurenson h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 14, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-10331 Document: 00515199006 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/14/2019No. 19

- 10331

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further re sponsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-10331 Document: 00515199006 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/14/2019
10 Appendix

Exhibit A Affidavit of David R. Dow Exhibit B Notice of Clerk of the Southern District Exhibit C Attorney Admissions Email, March 19, 2015

# Exhibit A

# Exhibit B

# Exhibit CHouston-Atty-Adm/TXSD/05/USC OURTS

03/19/2015 12:20 PM To: ddow@uh.edu

cc: Subject

: Membership in the Southern District of Texas

---------- Sent by: Claire Cassady/TXSD/05/USCOURTS

Mr. Dow:

The Attorney Admissions Committee has recommended that your petition for reinstatement with the Southern District of Texas be approved. The Court has accepted the Committee’s recommendation and the suspension of your membership to the Southern District of Texas has been lifted.

Your CM/ECF login has been reinstated. Your login is: drdow Your password has been reset to: SDtx0319

Our records show that your membership to the Southern District of Texas expired on August 21, 2012. To be reinstated, please log in to your DISTRICT CM/ECF account and follow the directions below:

From the blue ribbon across the top of the page, choose Civil. Under the Other Filings group, choose Admissions.

Choose Request for Renewal After Expiration.

Your attorney's Admission case number is: 4:00-mc- 27991

You must attach a brief letter explaining the lapse in membership and requesting reinstatement. Your letter will be reviewed and you will be notified of the decision and provided further instructions, if
necessary.

Please continue through all the screens, including the payment screen ($25 renewal fee), until you receive the Notice of Electronic Filing that indicates your renewal request has been docketed.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you, Attorney Admissions United States District Court Southern District of Texas Case 4:00-mc-27991 Document 8 Filed in TXSD on 03/19/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 13.1



     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Annual Report on December 31, 2003 for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code.

Jose Salim Mattar Junior, the Chief Executive Officer, and Roberto Antonio
Mendes, the Principal Financial Officer of Localiza Rent A Car S.A., each
certifies that, to the best of their respective knowledge:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Localiza
     Rent A Car S.A.


Belo Horizonte, June 29, 2004


                               By:      /s/ Jose Salim Mattar Junior
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Jose Salim Mattar Junior
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer-President
                                       Date:  June 29, 2004


                               By:      /s/ Roberto Antonio Mendes
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Roberto Antonio Mendes
                                       Title: Principal Financial Officer
                                       Date:  June 29, 2004
---

Exhibit 4.141

|                     |                               | 
|-------------------- | ----------------------------- | 
|[exhibit4140001.jpg] | Nevada Geothermal Power Inc. 
|                     |                              
|Suite 900            | Tel: 604-688-1553            
|409 Granville St.    | Fax: 604-688-5926            
|Vancouver, B.C       | Toll: 866-688-0808           
|Canada VC6 1T2       | Web: www.nevadageothermal.com









AMENDMENT TOEMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WALENCIAK,EFFECTIVE AS OF APRIL16, 2007

THISAMENDMENT TOEMPLOYMENTAGREEMENT(Agreement) is made andentered into effective as of April 16, 2008 (the Effective Date), by and between Nevada Geothermal Power Company, a Nevada corporation (the Company) and Max Walenciak (Employee), with reference to the following: THE ABOVE REFERENCED

AGREEMENT IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Clause 4.1(c) is amended as follows: For the additional period up to December 31, 2009, the Company will pay $1,100.00 per month towards the cost of interim Reno rental accommodation.

2. Clause 4.1(d) is amended by extending the period of time for reimbursement of moving expenses to December 31, 2009.





THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.

---

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT  WALENCIAKPage 2

In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

| |                                      | 
| | ------------------------------------ | 
| | NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER CO.          | 
| |                                      | 
| | Per:Signed                           | 
| | Authorized Signatory: Brian Fairbank | 
| | President & CEO                      | 

|                                  |   |               | 
|--------------------------------- | - | ------------- | 
|SIGNED, SEALED and DELIVERED by   | ) |               | 
|MAX WALENCIAK in the presence of: | ) |               | 
|                                  | ) |               | 
|                                  | ) |               | 
|Sharon L. DeSimoni                | ) |               | 
|                                  | ) |               | 
|February 02, 2009                 | ) | Signed        | 
|                                  | ) | Max Walenciak | 
|                                  | ) |               | 
|                                  | ) |               | 
|                                  | ) |               | 
|                                  | ) |               | 
|                                  | ) |               | 
|Signed                            | ) |               | 

---