alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1776

In Re: RONALD E. HARMON,

Debtor.

_________________________

RONALD E. HARMON,

Debtor - Appellant,

versus

FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, f/k/a

Atlantic National Bank of Florida,

Plaintiff - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge.

(CA-98-131-Y, BK-95-58325-JS, AP-97-5357-JS)

Submitted: January 19, 1999 Decided: March 19, 1999

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald E. Harmon, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Blair Hill, Bethesda,

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald E. Harmon appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s determination that a debt owed to

First Union National Bank of Florida was nondischargeable in

Harmon’s bankruptcy case. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See First Union

Nat’l Bank v. Harmon, Nos. CA-98-131-Y; BK-95-58325-JS; AP-97-5357-

JS (D. Md. Apr. 20, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### BOYKIN v. STATE.

No. 22382.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 3, 1943.

H. S. Beard, of Waco, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for negligent homicide in the first degree. The punishment is assessed at a fine of $500.

No notice of appeal appears in the record, in the absence of which this court is without any authority to consider the appeal. See Art. 827, C.C.P., and cases cited under said article in Vernon’s Ann.Tex. C.C.P.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
San Joaquin Valley m

AIR POLLUTIflil CflilTRfll DISTRICT HEALTHY AIR LIVINGJune 21,2013

Mr. Mike Guzzetta, Manager

Rule Evaluations Section

California Air Resources Board

P.O. Box 2815

Sacramento, CA 95812

Dear Mr. Guzzetta

Attached is the Rule Action Package for Rule 9610 (State lmplementation Plan

Credit for Emission Reductions Generated through Incentive Programs), adopted

by the District's Governing Board on June 20,2013. We request the California

Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit this rule and the appropriate documentation

to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a SIP revision.

lncluded with this Rule Action Package are the following attachments

1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist

2. ARB APCD/AQMD Rule Evaluation Form

3. Rule 9610

4. Governing Board Resolution

5. Governing Board Memo

6. Evidence of Public Hearing

7. Final Staff Report with appendices

8. 2013 Annual Demonstration Report

lf you have any questions, please contact Anna Myers at (559) 230-6100 or by email at anna.myers@valleyair.org. The District thanks you and your staff for your

assistance.

r of Strategies and lncentives

Attachments

Seyed Sadredln

Executive 0irectorlAir Pollution Control 0fficer

fllorthorn Region

4800 Enterprise Way

Modesr0, cA 95356.8718

Tel: {2091 557.6400 FAX:12091 557.6475

Central Region (Main 0ffice)

1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue

Fresno, CA 53726-0244

Tel: (559) 230.6000 FAX: {5591 230-6061

Southern Region

34946 Flyover Court

Bakersfield, CA 93308.9725

Tel 661.392-5500 FAX: 681.392.5585

www.valleyair.org www.healthyairliving.com Prhtd il rryclåd på0d. úl
1 From: Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 7:02 PM To: RedHill Subject: Fuel Tank Leakage Concern

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged



## We join the Board of Water Supply in urging effo rts by the Navy to ensure safe drinking water for Hawaii by taking the necessary steps to preven t further leakage from fuel tanks and to clean up the fuel that has already leaded out. We en joy Hawaii’s great water, but its sources need protection.

Save our water! Thank you,
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99(A)

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nautica Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies that:

         (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended August 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      By: s/ Harvey Sanders
                                          -------------------------------------
                                            Harvey Sanders
                                            Chief Executive Officer


Date:  October 11, 2002
     ----------------------------
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 12

                         ADVANTA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                THREE MONTHS ENDED
($ IN THOUSANDS)                                     MARCH 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  2004      2003
------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>       <C>
Net income                                       $ 9,439   $ 5,905
Income tax expense                                 6,163     3,696
------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings before income taxes                      15,602     9,601
Fixed charges:
  Interest on debt and deposits                    9,242    11,271
  Interest on subordinated debt payable
    to preferred securities trust(2)               2,289         0
  One-third of all rentals                           634       640
  Preferred stock dividend of consolidated
    subsidiary trust(2)                                0     2,248
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Total fixed charges                             12,165    14,159
------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings before income taxes and
  fixed charges                                   27,767    23,760
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(1)               2.28 x    1.68 x
------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

(1)      For purposes of computing these ratios, "earnings" represent income
         before income taxes plus fixed charges. "Fixed charges" consist of
         interest expense, one-third (the portion deemed representative of the
         interest factor) of rental expense on operating leases, and preferred
         stock dividends of subsidiary trust.

(2)      Our adoption of FIN 46, as revised, resulted in the deconsolidation of
         the subsidiary trust that issued our trust preferred securities
         effective December 31, 2003. As a result of the deconsolidation of that
         trust, the consolidated income statement includes interest expense on
         subordinated debt payable to preferred securities trust beginning
         January 1, 2004, as compared to periods through December 31, 2003 that
         included payments on the trust preferred securities classified as
         minority interest in income of consolidated subsidiary.
#### CERDA v. STATE.

No. 22904.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 14, 1944.

Milton J. Baird, of Edinburg, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a seduction case; the punishment, two years in the state penitentiary.

A statement of the facts is not deemed called for.

In cases of his character, the prose-cutrix is an accomplice and must be corroborated. Art. 709, C.C.P. The corroboration must extend to both the promise of marriage and the act of sexual intercourse. Mumford v. State, 120 Tex.Cr.R. 566, 47 S.W.2d 832; Kennedy v. State, 104 Tex.Cr.R. 152, 282 S.W. 813; Brewer v. State, 93 Tex.Cr.R. 213, 246 S.W. 663; Slaughter v. State, 86 Tex.Cr.R. 527, 218 S.W. 767.

In the instant case, the charge upon the subject of necessary corroboration did not comply with this rule, but, to the contrary, the corroboration required was only that of “other testimony tending -to connect the defendant with the offense charged.”

It is apparent that the charge as given was insufficient. Although no exception or objection pointing out this defect was reserved to the charge, yet there do appear two special requested charges, which were refused, which are deemed sufficient to call the trial court’s attention to the necessity of requiring corroboration of the prosecutrix in the two particulars mentioned.

For the error mentioned, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3068 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3068

 Relating to members of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa 
                          Indians of Michigan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2013

 Mr. Benishek introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Relating to members of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa 
                          Indians of Michigan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL REFERENCE AND REPORT.

    Pursuant to the findings and conclusions contained in the Report 
issued by the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the 
Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of money not otherwise 
appropriated, to members of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and 
Chippewa Indians of Michigan, the sum of $ ____, and to the Grand 
Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians of Michigan, the sum of $ 
____.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice #3345]


Advisory Committee on Labor Diplomacy; Notice of Meeting

    The Advisory Committee on Labor Diplomacy (ACLD) will hold a 
meeting from 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on November 8, 2000, in room 1107, 
U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW, Washington, DC 20520. 
Committee Chairman Thomas Donahue, former President of the AFL-CIO, 
will chair the meeting.
    The ACLD is comprised of prominent persons with expertise in the 
area of international labor policy and labor diplomacy. The ACLD 
advises the Secretary of State and the President on the resources and 
policies necessary to implement labor diplomacy programs efficiently, 
effectively and in a manner that ensures U.S. leadership before the 
international community in promoting the objectives and ideals of U.S. 
labor policies in the 21st century. The ACLD will make recommendations 
on how to strengthen the Department of State's ability to respond to 
the many challenges facing the United States and the federal government 
in international labor matters. These challenges include the protection 
of worker rights, the elimination of exploitative child labor, and the 
prevention of abusive working conditions.
    The agenda for the November 8 meeting includes discussion of the 
interagency process on international labor policy formulation.
    Members of the public are welcome to attend the meeting as seating 
capacity allows. As access to the Department of State is controlled, 
persons wishing to attend the meeting must be pre-cleared by calling or 
faxing the following information, by close of business November 6, to 
Eric Barboriak at (202) 647-4327 or fax (202) 647-0431 or email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a383b28383528333b313f371a292e3b2e3f743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cfadaebdada0bda6aea4aaa28fbcbbaebbaae1a8a0b9">[email protected]</span></a>: name; company or organization affiliation (if 
any); date of birth; and social security number. Pre-cleared persons 
should use the 23rd Street entrance to the State Department and have a 
driver's license with photo, a passport, a U.S. Government ID or other 
valid photo identification.
    Members of the public may, if they wish, submit a brief statement 
to the Committee in writing. Those wishing further information should 
contact Mr. Barboriak at the phone and fax numbers provided above.

    Dated: October 13, 2000.
Michael E. Parmly,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and 
Labor, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-27071 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 117 Filed 11/03/22 Page 1 of 2
Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 117 Filed 11/03/22 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 28, 2019 s0520

Order 

Clerk

May 28, 2019

157985(35) 

In re MANWELL

_________________________________________

JONATHAN ERNEST MANWELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 157985

COA: 341965

MACOMB CIRCUIT COURT,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 4, 

2019 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from consolidated
statements of income and consolidated balance sheets.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              18
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      876
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         19
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,451
<PP&E>                                           4,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,793
<BONDS>                                            976
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,633
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,579
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    114
<INCOME-TAX>                                        37
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 77
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        77
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the consolidated financial statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
2404 Superior Drive, Arlington, TX 76013 www.txps.com Telephone 817 794 0068 Toll Fr ee 800 211 9690 Fax 817 795 3474 FAA Repair Station T4XR853J FAA Repair Station TF0R552Y May 16 , 2011

Docket Operations M

– 30
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.

Room W12

– 140
West Building Ground Floor
Washington, DC 20590

– 0001 Submitted Electronically via : www.regulations.gov

RE: Comments to Docket No. FAA

– 2010

– 1167

Public comment period extension request

To Whom It May Concern:
Texas Pneumatic Systems, Inc. (TPS) and Turbine Fuel Systems, Inc. (TFS)

, respectfully submit th is request for additional time to submit comments on the proposed A irworthiness D irective (AD) interpretation published in the Feder al Register on April 14, 2011

. 1

TPS is an FAA repair s tation specializing in the repair/overhaul of pneumatic components for the military and commercial airline industry worldwide. Its sister company, TFS, specializes in the repair and overhaul of fuel components for all turbine

- powered commercial and military aircraft

. As such, both TPS and TFS are directly impacted by the matters addressed in the proposed interpretation.

T he scope and extent of the proposed interpretation warrants an extended comment period

. The interpretation requires strict compliance with any document incorporated by reference in an AD and thus has far

- reaching negative implications that must be carefully considered in order to advance a practical and legal alternative.

1 76 FR 208982404 Superior Drive, Arlington, TX 76013 www.txps.com Telephone 817 794 0068 Toll Fr ee 800 211 9690 Fax 817 795 3474 FAA Repair Station T4XR853J FAA Repair Station TF0R552Y Extending the comment period would ensure full participation by companies , such as TPS and TFS, most directly impacted by the proposed interpretation . Consequently, we ask that the date be extended to August 16, 2011

. We look forward to your favorable res ponse and the opportunity to provide meaningful comment to the proposed interpretation

. Respectfully submitted,

Bernard E. Rookey President/CEO
#### GRUMBLES v. STATE.

No. 21882.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 21, 1942.

J. Mitch Johnson, of San Saba, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by the jury and sentenced to pay a fine of $100 for a violation of the local option laws of this State.

The testimony shows that on March 1, 1941, three boys presented themselves at appellant’s home and requested him to sell them some whisky. He agreed to do so, and handed one of them a bottle of whisky, and one of the boys reached over towards .the appellant and handed him some “metal”, as testified to by one of them; however the two witnesses that testified, both said they could not swear that they saw anyone pay appellant for the whisky; about this time in the transaction the sheriff and another drove up and took the whisky into their possession. The sheriff searched the boys’ car, which search was objected and excepted to, but found nothing therein, but upon a search of the boys they found the bottle of whisky. There was naught found in the car, therefore nothing to address an objection to in so far as the car was concerned.

The matter of a sale was at issue herein, and the evidently reluctant witnesses only testified to circumstances from which the main fact could be inferred, and that is, of a sale; and there being no further testimony thereto, the case rested upon circumstantial evidence. See Branch’s Penal Code, p. 1341.

The fact of whether or not this was a sale was also a matter made an issue by *72the State’s witnesses in that the State was not able to show directly that any funds were passed nor any payment made or promised to be made for such whisky. True it is that such could be shown by means of circumstances, but it is also true that a sale should be shown, and we think the court should have defined in his charge the term “sale” under the facts herein shown.

Appellant presented the court with properly prepared charges on both a sale and circumstantial evidence, and the failure to give same is made the basis of separate bills of exceptions.

For the failure to give such charges this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Flagstar Capital Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Carrie,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


Dated: March 28, 2003                      by:  /s/ Michael W. Carrie

                                                Michael W. Carrie
                                                Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer