alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2923 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2923

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require the Secretary of 
   the Treasury to disclose certain taxpayer rights in the letter of 
    acknowledgment of receipt of an application to be treated as an 
              organization described in section 501(c)(3).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2013

 Mr. Marchant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require the Secretary of 
   the Treasury to disclose certain taxpayer rights in the letter of 
    acknowledgment of receipt of an application to be treated as an 
              organization described in section 501(c)(3).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disclosure of Taxpayer Rights Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF TAXPAYER RIGHTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 508 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Disclosure of Taxpayer Rights.--The letter of acknowledgment 
of receipt of an application to be treated as an organization described 
in section 501(c)(3) shall include a notice of the right under section 
7428 to obtain a declaratory judgment relating to status and 
classification as such an organization.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to applications submitted after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered June 4, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01368-CV

FREDIS BENITEZ, MARGARITA BENITEZ, AND ROBERTO VIERA-SEGURA DBA 

VIERA'S BODY SHOP/VIERA'S KUSTOMS/VIERA'S KUSTOMZ, Appellants

V.

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-03671

ORDER

The City’s motion to strike appellants’ reply brief is GRANTED. Appellants’ reply 

brief, filed on February 12, 2014, is ORDERED stricken.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
#### League for Preservation of Civil Rights & Internal Tranquility, Inc., Appellant, *v.*City of Cincinnati et al., Appellees.

(No. 28109

Decided April 24, 1940.)

*Mr. John D. Driscoll*and *Mr. John A. Thorburn,*for appellant.

*Mr. John D. Ellis,*city solicitor, and *Mr. Nathan Solinger,*for appellee, City of Cincinnati.

*Mr. John P. Goldsberry,*for appellee, The Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Company.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of . right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers. Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-26-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-26-2000
<CASH>                                         742,909<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                    37,228
<RECEIVABLES>                                  195,401
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,574
<INVENTORY>                                    123,088<F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,074,805
<PP&E>                                         421,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                 241,509
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,501,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          288,542
<BONDS>                                        150,337
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       210,646
<OTHER-SE>                                     774,433<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,501,696
<SALES>                                        278,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               278,191
<CGS>                                          133,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  133,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,357
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,201
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,770
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,431
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,431
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56
<FN>
<F1> Amount includes $203,438 of short-term investments.
<F2> Amount represents net inventories.
<F3> Amount includes retained earnings and other comprehensive income.
</FN>


</TABLE>
TELEPHONE CONTACT SUMMARY

Brick and Structural Clay Products

FROM: Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International

DATE OF CONTACT: June 2 , 2015

ORGANIZATION CONTACTED:

Boral Bricks Inc.

PERSON CONTACTED: Terry Schimmel

334

- 480

- 2488

PURPOSE OF CONTACT: To obtain additional information regarding green brick mercury testing results

.

SUMMARY OF CONTACT:

The Br ick Industry Association (BIA) provided the EPA with a spreadsheet of mercury green
brick testing results with the intent to add a mercury raw mate rial variability factor to the
Mercury MACT floor limit. In order to incorporate this raw material data, the EPA need ed to know a little bit more about the general location of the clay deposits being used by the facilities :

- What is the clay deposit name being used by the facility?

- What is the geological age of the deposit?

- Is the location of the facility approximately the same location as the deposit?

Mr. Schimmel indicated that Boral Bricks Inc. could provide th e additional information
regarding the deposit information in correlation to the green brick mercury testing results.

Mr. Schimmel indicated that he would provide a spreadsheet of the Boral Bricks Inc. facilities
that provided green brick testing results to EPA via BIA and fill in the : Name of Clay Deposit,
Geological Age of the Deposit, and Latitude/Longitude of the Clay Deposit.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                 STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER FURNISHED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of
Citizens South Banking Corporation (the "Company").

        This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004 (the "Report").

        By execution of this statement, I certify that:

                A)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                        1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

                B)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
                        for the periods covered by the Report.

        This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report
so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

March 10, 2005                                        /s/ Gary F. Hoskins
Dated                                                 --------------------------
                                                      Gary F. Hoskins
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

                                       412
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 279 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 279

  To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the 
 Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian tribes, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2013

   Mr. Cole introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the 
 Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian tribes, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY REAFFIRMED.

    (a) Reaffirmation.--Section 19 of the Act of June 18, 1934 
(commonly known as the ``Indian Reorganization Act''; 25 U.S.C. 479), 
is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``The term'' and inserting 
                ``Effective beginning on June 18, 1934, the term''; and
                    (B) by striking ``any recognized Indian tribe now 
                under Federal jurisdiction'' and inserting ``any 
                federally recognized Indian tribe''; and
            (2) by striking the third sentence and inserting the 
        following: ``In said sections, the term `Indian tribe' means 
        any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, 
        village, or community that the Secretary of the Interior 
        acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly known as 
the ``Indian Reorganization Act''; 25 U.S.C. 479), on the date of 
enactment of that Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### WALKER v. STATE.

No. 24370.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 12, 1949.

*625Dick Harbin, Dublin, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, Tyler, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

At a former term, the appeal in the instant case was dismissed, 220 S.W.2d 168, because no final judgment appeared to have been entered.

Thereafter, at the motion of the State and on the 27th day of June, 1949, a judgment was entered nunc pro tunc. From this judgment appellant gave notice of appeal to this Court.

The entry of the judgment nunc pro tunc was authorized and in keeping with established precedents. See art. 772, C.C.P.; 12 Tex.Jur., Criminal Law, Sec. 352; Ex parte Beard, 41 Tex. 234.

Appellant moves to reinstate his appeal and to have the supplemental transcript evidencing the nunc pro tunc proceedings considered in connection with and as a part of the record in the case, or, in the alternative, to withdraw the statement of facts from this record in order that same may be filed with and as a part of an entirely new record in the case.

We see no useful purpose to be served by requiring the preparation of a new transcript in this case.

The motion is granted and the appeal is reinstated to be considered in the light of the record before us, as supplemented by the judgment of conviction entered nunc pro tunc.

The statement of facts in this case cannot be considered because it is entirely in question and answer form. Under the express and mandatory provisions of 5ec. 1 of Art. 760, C.C.P., as amended, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. art. 760, subd. 1, the statement of facts in a criminal case must, be in narrative form.

Appellant’s contention relative to the failure of the -trial court to charge upon the law of circumstantial evidence and to the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction cannot be appraised in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2880 

To require the Secretary of Education to use the excess revenue generated 

from the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program to carry out 

the Federal Pell Grant Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2013 

Mr. KIND introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Education to use the excess 

revenue generated from the William D. Ford Federal 

Direct Loan Program to carry out the Federal Pell 

Grant Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPLYING EXCESS REVENUE TO FEDERAL 

4 PELL GRANTS. 

5 The Secretary of Education shall— 

6 (1) as soon as practicable after the end of a fis7 cal year, determine whether during such fiscal year 

8 the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2880 IH

1 under part D of title IV of the Higher Education 

2 Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.) generated 

3 any revenue in excess of the amount that was nec4 essary to cover the costs of carrying out such Pro5 gram for such fiscal year; and 

6 (2) if such excess revenue was generated, use 

7 such excess revenue to carry out the Federal Pell 

8 Grant Program under subpart 1 of part A of title 

9 IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

10 1070a) for the succeeding fiscal year. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We haveissued our reports dated March 15, 2007, accompanying theconsolidated financial statements and management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingincluded in the Annual Report of Horizon Offshore, Inc. on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the RegistrationStatements of Horizon Offshore, Inc. on Forms S-3 (FileNo. 333-47246, effective October 11, 2000, FileNo. 333-62356, effective June 11, 2001, FileNo. 333-130724, effective February 7, 2006, and FileNo. 333-131780, effective April 10, 2006) and on Forms S-8(File No. 333-62630, effective June 8, 2001, FileNo. 333-98243, effective August 16, 2002, FileNo. 333-110167, effective October 31, 2003, FileNo. 333-128306, effective September 14, 2005 and FileNo. 333-136276, effective August 3, 2006)./s/ GRANT THORNTON LLPHouston, Texas
**Exhibit
      23**





**Consent
      of Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.**





The
      Board
      of Directors


Citizens
      South Banking Corporation


Gastonia,
      North Carolina







We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 333-103218, 333-77657 and 333-111228) of Citizens South Banking
      Corporation of our report dated March 14, 2008, related to the audits of the
      consolidated statements of condition as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and
      the
      related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in
      stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the three year period ended December 31,
      2007 and of our report dated March 14, 2008, on the effectiveness of internal
      control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which are included
      in
      the December 31, 2007, Annual Report on Form 10-K of Citizens South Banking
      Corporation.







/s/
      Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.





Gastonia,
      North Carolina


March
      14,
      2008
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 18, 2019

No. 04-19-00595-CV

Rudolph RESENDEZ, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, et al.,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-10-00236-CVK

Honorable H. Paul Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s record in this appeal has been filed. The clerk’s record shows 

appellant is appealing from a trial court cause number 15-10-00236-CVK. This 

court dismissed appellant’s previous appeal from this cause number, because the 

record does not contain a final appealable judgment and this court accordingly 

lacked appellate jurisdiction. 

The clerk’s record in this appeal does not contain a final appealable 

judgment. In order for this court to have jurisdiction, an appealable judgment 

must be written and signed by the trial court. In re M.R.G., No. 04-17-00623-CV, 

2017 WL 4938422, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 1, 2017, no pet.) (mem. 

op.). It therefore appears to the court that the order or judgment appellant desires 

to appeal is not appealable. 

We ORDER appellant to show cause in writing to this court within 10 

days of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

If a supplemental clerk’s record is required to demonstrate our jurisdiction, 

appellant must (a) ask the trial court clerk to prepare the record, and (b) notify this 

court that such a request was made. We further order the appellate deadlines 

suspended until further order of this court. If appellant fails to file a satisfactory 

response by the date ordered, the appeal will be dismissed.
_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001052971
<NAME> IHLLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          94,325
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    254,750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               410,329
<PP&E>                                          84,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 875,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          482,130
<BONDS>                                        200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   875,337
<SALES>                                      1,213,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,213,526
<CGS>                                          991,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,172,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,820)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,835
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,414
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,937
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,477
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,477
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 11, 2000, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Advanced Micro Devices, Inc./ObjectSpace, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, KLA-Tencor Corp., San Jose, CA has acquired the Fab Solutions Division of ObjectSpace, Inc., Dallas, TX and has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc./ObjectSpace, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On December 19, 1997, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc./ObjectSpace, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 24, 1998 (63 FR 39901).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-27172 Filed 10-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M