alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3093 

To exclude individuals who receive health insurance coverage pursuant to 

the terms of a collective bargaining agreement from tax credits and 

reductions in cost-sharing under the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 

Mrs. BLACK (for herself, Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, Mr. WESTMORELAND, 

Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. CRAWFORD, and Mr. DUNCAN

of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 

on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To exclude individuals who receive health insurance coverage 

pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement from tax credits and reductions in cost-sharing 

under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Union Bailout Preven5 tion Act of 2013’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3093 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON SUBSIDIES FOR INDIVIDUALS IN 

2 COLLECTIVELY BARGAINED HEALTH PLANS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sion of law, no premium tax credits shall be permitted 

5 under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

6 and no reductions in cost-sharing shall be permitted under 

7 section 1402 of the Patient Protection and Affordable 

8 Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18071) with respect to an individual 

9 for health insurance coverage provided pursuant to the 

10 terms of a collective bargaining agreement involving one 

11 or more employers. 

12 (b) QUALIFIED PLANS.—Section 1301(a) of the Pa13 tient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 

14 18021(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(5) COLLECTIVELY BARGAINED PLANS.—The 

16 term ‘qualified health plan’ shall not include health 

17 insurance coverage provided pursuant to the terms 

18 of a collective bargaining agreement involving one or 

19 more employers.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<CIK>                            0001051827
<NAME>                           MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-19-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-26-1997
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                          85
<COMMON>                                             15
<OTHER-SE>                                         (100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          0
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                          0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        


</TABLE>
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 16, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Raymond A. Low                                                                                                        |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Raymond A. LowChief Financial Officer andCorporate Secretary(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer) |

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2667]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1248-DR]


U.S. Virgin Islands; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major 
Disaster Declaration

AGENCY:  Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-1248-DR), dated September 24, 1998, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  January 20, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Notice is hereby given that, in a letter 
dated January 20, 2000, the President concurred with the Director's 
recommendation to adjust the cost sharing arrangements concerning 
Federal funds provided under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 51521 et seq.), 
and the Insular Areas Act (10 U.S.C. 1469a(d) in a letter to James L. 
Witt, Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in the U.S. Virgin Islands, 
resulting from Hurricane Georges on September 19-22, 1998, is of 
sufficient severity and magnitude that special conditions are 
warranted regarding the cost sharing arrangements for Federal funds 
provided under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act, P.L. 93-288, as amended (``the Stafford Act'').
    Therefore, I concur with your recommendation to amend my 
declaration of September 24, 1998 to authorize Federal funds for the 
Individual and Family Grant, Public Assistance, and Hazard 
Mitigation Grant Programs at 90 percent of total eligible costs.
    Please notify the Federal Coordinating Officer of this amendment 
to my major disaster declaration.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-2667 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### LOLLER v. STATE.

No. 21955.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 25, 1942.

W. E. Martin, of Abilene, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The unlawful sale of whiskey in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The commencement of the complaint upon which the information was based reads as follows:

“In the Name and by the Authority of the State of Texas:

> “Before me, the undersigned authority, in and for Runnels County, Texas, on this day personally appeared A. P. Mercer who after being by me first duly sworn, says upon his oath, that he has reason to believe, and does believe and charge, that J. H. Loller ** **

It is claimed that such complaint is fatally defective in failing to use the word “good” in connection with the terms “reason to believe.” It is contended that, under the terms of Art. 222, C.C.P., a valid complaint based upon belief of the affiant must allege that the affiant “has *good*reason to believe, and does believe.”

 A substantial compliance with the provisions of the statute mentioned is all that is required. Brown v. State, 11 Tex.App. 451; Pittman v. State, 14 Tex.App. S76; Bell v. State, 18 Tex.App. 53, 51 Am.Rep. 293; Smith v. State, 103 Tex.Cr. R. 228, 280 S.W. 581. Under the above authorities, the complaint is sufficient.

No other question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of CSK.
  April 17, 2008
    
    /s/ LAWRENCE N. MONDRYLawrence N. MondryChief Executive OfficerApril 17, 2008
    
    /s/ JAMES D. CONSTANTINEJames D. ConstantineChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3071 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3071

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to provide that 
  no Government contribution may be made toward the cost of Exchange 
      coverage for any Member of Congress or congressional staff.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2013

    Mr. Gingrey of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to provide that 
  no Government contribution may be made toward the cost of Exchange 
      coverage for any Member of Congress or congressional staff.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Special Treatment for Congress 
Act''.

SEC. 2. GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTION NOT PERMITTED.

    Section 1312(d)(3)(D) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
Act (42 U.S.C. 18032(d)(3)(D)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and
            (2) by inserting after clause (i) the following:
                            ``(ii) Government contribution not 
                        permitted.--Notwithstanding any provision of 
                        chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, or 
                        of any other law, no Government contribution 
                        under such chapter may be made for health 
                        benefits obtained by any Member of Congress or 
                        congressional staff in accordance with clause 
                        (i).''.
                                 <all>
```
2006 Executive Officer Cash Compensation Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.33 
 COMPENSATION INFORMATION FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 The table below provides information regarding the 2005 cash bonus
awarded to, and the 2006 annual base salary of, each executive officer of Conor Medsystems, Inc. 
  

							
	 Executive Officer
	  	2005 Cash Bonus	  	2006 Annual Base Salary1
	 Frank Litvack, CEO
	  	$	190,000	  	$	350,000
	 Michael Boennighausen, CFO
	  	$	100,000	  	$	235,000
	 Azin Parhizgar, COO
	  	$	110,000	  	$	260,000
	 Jeff Shanley, CTO
	  	$	100,000	  	$	230,000



	1	Effective as of March 1, 2006. 

  

 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of Vertis, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Reporton Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005**(the “Report”) of the Company fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  March 27,  2006 | /s/ STEPHEN E. TREMBLAY |                    |
|------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                         | Name:                   | Stephen E.  Tremblay    |
|                         | Title:                  | Chief Financial Officer |
|                              |                         |                         |  |  |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not beingfiled as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

The undersigned officer of The Stride Rite Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 3, 2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose
whatsoever.



Date:       July 13, 2005           Name:       /s/ Frank A. Caruso
      ------------------------            ------------------------------------
                                    Title:      Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.11
                             PROMISSORY NOTE

                             PROMISSORY NOTE

Principal amount $4,000.00                          Date: June 17, 2004

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, RMD Technologies, Inc. hereby promise to
pay to the order of Patrick A. Galliher the sum of Four Thousand
Dollars, together with interest thereon at the rate of 1% per month on
the unpaid balance. Said sum shall be paid upon demand.

     This note shall at the option of any holder thereof be
immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of any of the
following:  1) Breach of any condition of any security interest,
mortgage, loan agreement, pledge agreement or guarantee granted as
collateral security for this note. 2) Breach of any condition of any
loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage, if any, having a
priority over any loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage on
collateral granted, in whole or in part, as collateral security for
this note. 3) Upon the death, incapacity, dissolution or liquidation
of any of the undersigned, or any endorser, guarantor to surety
hereto. 4) Upon the filing by any of the undersigned of an assignment
for the benefit of creditors, bankruptcy or other form of insolvency,
or by suffering an involuntary petition in bankruptcy or receivership
not vacated within thirty (30) days.

     In the event this note shall be in default and placed for
collection, then the undersigned agree to pay all reasonable attorney
fees and costs of collection. All payments hereunder shall be made to
such address as may from time to time be designated by any holder.

     The undersigned and all other parties to this note, whether as
endorsers, guarantors or sureties, agree to remain fully bound until
this note shall be fully paid and waive demand, presentment and
protest and all notices hereto and further agree to remain bound,
notwithstanding any extension, modification, waiver, or other
indulgence or discharge or release of any obligor hereunder or
exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as
security for this note. No modification or indulgence by any holder
hereof shall be binding unless in writing; and any indulgence on any
one occasion shall not be an indulgence for any other or future
occasion. Any modification or change in terms, hereunder granted by
any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon each of the
undersigned, notwithstanding the acknowledgement of any of the
undersigned, and each of the undersigned does hereby irrevocably grant
to each of the others a power of attorney to enter into any such
modification on their behalf. The rights of any holder hereof shall be
cumulative and not necessarily successive. This note shall take effect
as a sealed instrument and shall be construed, governed and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

RMD Technologies, Inc.


By: /s/  Pat Galliher
Pat Galliher, President
#### LA EACE v. CINCINNATI, NEWPORT & COVINGTON RY. CO., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 30, 1952.

Walter J. Burke, Newport, for appellant.

Arthur J. Daly, Cincinnati, Ohio, for ap-pellee.

LATIMER, Justice.

The sole question presented is whether a wife may recover for loss of consortium due to an injury negligently inflicted on her husband.

Appellant’s husband, George LaEace, sustained personal injuries while a passenger on a bus operated by appellee. Appellant seeks $5,000 damages for loss of consortium, alleging the injuries suffered by her husband resulted from appellee’s negligence and were the proximate cause of her loss of that consortium. Appellee’s general! demurrer to the petition was sustained. Having declined to plead further, appellant’s petition was dismissed.

The issue presented is not novel. In Cravens v. Louisville & N. R. Co, 195 Ky. 257, 242 S.W. 628, we denied the wife the right of recovery when the injury to the-husband was a result of negligence. This decision was, and is, in line with the overwhelming weight of authority. 27 Am. Jur, Husband and Wife, section 514, page 114; Nash v. Mobile & O. R. Co, 149 Miss. 823, 116 So. 100, 59 A.L.R. 680, Restatement of Torts, volume III, section 695. _ *535Appellant frankly concedes that such is the prevailing rule.

However, appellant ably argues that this principle of law should now be overruled hy this court. As authority for her position she cites Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., 87 U.S.App.D.C. 57, 183 F.2d 811, in which the U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals analyzed the cases propounding the rule and proceeded to adopt an opposite position. Appellant’s argument is further supported by Mr. Prosser, in his work on Torts, and by Mr. Kinnaird in his article in 35 Ky.LJ. 220.

The reasons given for the adoption of the existing rule have been clearly set out and reiterated by this court and the courts of other jurisdictions. We think the reasoning therein sound and see no reason for adopting a rule utterly at variance therewith.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>  U.S. $

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,294)
<INVENTORY>                                    625,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               729,587
<PP&E>                                         279,259
<DEPRECIATION>                               (118,698)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,035,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          272,993
<BONDS>                                         81,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           278
<OTHER-SE>                                     134,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,035,652
<SALES>                                      1,231,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,231,455
<CGS>                                          636,239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,144,607
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,548
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,436
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,112
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (741)
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,371
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.96


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(ii)  CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connect with the quarterly report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "'Company"') on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2009 to be filed with Securities and
Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "'Report"'), I, Mark V.
McDonough, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods covered by the Report. It is not intended that this statement be
deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.  Date: October 14,
      2009
    By:
    /s/Mark V.
      McDonoughMark V. McDonough,Chief
      Financial Officer