alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Statement of Chief Executive Officer Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

          The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the “Company”).

          This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”).

          By execution of this statement, I certify that:

|   | A)     | the Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.   78m(a) or 78o(d)) and                                                              |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | B)     | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,   in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations   of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report. |

| March 13, 2007 |   | /s/ Kim S. Price                      |
|----------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                |   |                                       |
| Dated          |   | Kim S. Price                          |
|           |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

----
#### BURCH v. LADY, Warden.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 30, 1952.

Charlie C. H. Burch, Pro Se.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., W. Owen Keller, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

The appellant, Charlie C. H. Burch, is a prisoner in the Kentucky State Reformatory under two judgments of the Fayette Circuit Court and one judgment of the Bell Circuit Court. This Court denied his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in Burch v. Whaley, 311 Ky. 53, 223 S.W.2d 355.

In January, 1952, appellant filed a petition in the Bell Circuit Court for a writ of error coram nobis. It was denied, hence, this appeal.

Appellant appears here pro se, urging numerous grounds for reversal of the judgment which have been thoroughly examined by the court and found to *be*without merit. However, inasmuch as he insists that his constitutional rights have been violated by denial of due process of law, we find it expedient to briefly set forth the court’s proceedings about which he complains.

The record reflects that on November 12, 1945, appellant shot and killed Bill Hopper. He waived examining trial and was indicted on the charge of murder. On the day his case was set for trial, appellant appeared represented by counsel and announced ready for trial. After the jury was accepted by appellant, he, in person, and by his attorney, waived arraignment and entered a plea of guilty. Thereupon the jury found him guilty and fixed his punishment at life imprisonment. Several days later appellant was again brought into court and informed of the nature of the indictment, plea and verdict entered in his case and was asked if he .had legal cause to show why judgment of the court should not be pronounced against him. He offered none. He did not enter a motion for a new trial, nor file an appeal, but accepted the judgment of the conviction.

Under the state of the record we fail to find wherein appellant was denied due process of law under the Federal Constitution, or under the constitution and laws of this 'Commonwealth. Harrod v. Whaley, Ky., 242 S.W.2d 750.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3110 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 369
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3110

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 29, 2014

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To allow for the harvest of gull eggs by the Huna Tlingit people within 
           Glacier Bay National Park in the State of Alaska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Huna Tlingit Traditional Gull Egg 
Use Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITED AUTHORIZATION FOR COLLECTION OF GULL EGGS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this 
Act as the ``Secretary'') may allow the collection by members of the 
Hoonah Indian Association of the eggs of glaucous-winged gulls (Laurus 
glaucescens) within Glacier Bay National Park (referred to in this Act 
as the ``Park'') not more frequently than twice each calendar year at 
up to 5 locations within the Park, subject to any terms and conditions 
that the Secretary determines to be necessary.
    (b) Applicable Law.--For the purposes of sections 203 and 816 of 
the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 410hh-2, 
3126), the collection of eggs of glaucous-winged gulls within the Park 
in accordance with subsection (a) shall be considered to be a use 
specifically permitted by that Act.
    (c) Harvest Plan.--The Secretary shall establish schedules, 
locations, and any additional terms and conditions that the Secretary 
determines to be necessary for the harvesting of eggs of glaucous-
winged gulls in the Park, based on an annual harvest plan to be 
prepared by the Secretary and the Hoonah Indian Association.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 369

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3110

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To allow for the harvest of gull eggs by the Huna Tlingit people within 
           Glacier Bay National Park in the State of Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 29, 2014

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
Amendment to Olin Supplemental Contributing Employee Ownership Plan



 Exhibit 10(d)(1) 
 BENEFIT PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF OLIN CORPORATION 
 AMENDMENT TO THE OLIN CORPORATION

 SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRIBUTING EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP PLAN 
 (As amended and restated effective January 1, 2005) 
 Olin Corporation (the “Company”)
currently maintains the Olin Corporation Supplemental Contributing Employee Ownership Plan (the “Plan”). In Section 7.1 of the Plan, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan. Pursuant to the authority granted to the Benefit
Plan Review Committee of Olin Corporation (“the Committee”), the Committee hereby amends the Plan in the following manner: 
  

	1.	Article IV of the Plan is amended by adding the following Section 4.7: 

 “4.7. Effective May 27, 2005, the Plan is amended to add a Participation Termination Provision, provided that such provision
shall be subject to the following requirements: (i) the Company, in its sole discretion, consents to each election, (ii) the Company determines the form and terms of any termination election (which form and terms may vary among
participants), (iii) in accordance with the 409A Guidance, the SCEOP Participant shall receive his accrued but unpaid Plan benefit as soon as administratively feasible following such termination, provided that such payment(s) will be made on or
before December 31, 2005, or if later, the taxable year in which the amount is earned and vested, and (iv) only SCEOP Participants who terminate employment with the Company on or before December 31, 2005 are eligible to elect to
terminate their Plan participation (subject to the Company consent contained in item (i)). Subject to other terms and conditions of the Plan, a SCEOP Participant terminating participation under this Section 4.7 remains eligible for the Excess
Company Matching Contribution payable with respect to any 2005 SCEOP Participant Contributions, if and when paid. 
 “Participation Termination Provision” shall mean an election to terminate participation in the Plan upon a Participant’s termination of employment on or before December 31, 2005, consistent with applicable Internal
Revenue Service guidance for Code Section 409A, including without limitation, IRS Notice 2005-1, as amended (referred to herein as the “409A Guidance”). 
 Effective as of May 27, 2005, this Section 4.7 is further amended so that no SCEOP Participant other than Anthony W. Ruggiero
may make a termination election under this Section 4.7.”
WCI Comments to US EPA concerning Subpart W

Applicable Subpart W sections: the comments which follow concern two rule

sections:

1) §98.233(q) Leak detection and leaker em ission factors, Equation W-18, 2) §98.233(r) Population count and em ission factors, Equation W-19.

Issue: The variable GHG i for some sources is set equal to 1. This assumption is

valid for CH 4 but in the case of CO 2 , assuming a value of 1 will result in a significant overestimation of CO 2 emissions. This is because the concentration

of CO 2 in sweet (processed) gas is typically around 1% (GHG i = 0.01), not 100% (GHG i = 1).

Suggested regulation modifications: In Equations W-18 and W-19 where GHG i is defined, add language to require that reporters use the actual CO 2 concentration in processed gas.

Example: additional suggested language is shown in italics.

§98.233(q)

GHG i = For onshore natural gas processing fa cilities, concentration of GHG i,

CH 4 or CO 2 , in the total hydrocarbon of the f eed natural gas; for other facilities listed in §98.230(a)(3) through (a)(8), GHG i equals 1 for CH 4 . Reporters shall

use the concentration of CO 2 in either processed natural gas or LNG for CO 2 GHG i in these other facilities.

§98.233(r)

Similar changes in the definition of GHG i for CO 2 would be required here as well.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         120,560
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,282,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (135,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,375,188
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,219,991
<PP&E>                                       4,601,538
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,297,538
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,429,753
<BONDS>                                      1,949,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        125
<COMMON>                                         3,417
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,914,849
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,297,538
<SALES>                                     19,433,247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,433,247
<CGS>                                       11,008,112
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,287,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,280,939)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                55,082
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             627,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                735,636
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            735,636
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   735,636
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>