alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HUNT et al. v. WICHITA COUNTY WATER IMPROVEMENT DIST. NO. 2 et al.

No. 14902.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Jan. 9, 1948.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 30, 1948.

E. W. Napier, of Wichita Falls, for appellants.

O. R. Tipps and Britain & Connell, all of Wichita Falls, for appellees.

HALL, Justice.

On April 9, 1941, appellant, Marie Anchor Hunt, filed a petition in the form of a bill of review for the purpose of setting aside an adverse judgment rendered against her in the District Court of Wichita County, Texas, in the year 1930, and in favor of appellee, Wichita County Water Improvement District No. 2, based on a claim for delinquent taxes due the appellee by appellant, which resulted in the foreclosure of the judgment lien upon the lands in question owned by appellant.

On July 7, 1941, the appellee filed its answer setting up as a defense the judgment of the trial court in cause No. 23042-C and judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Anchor v. Wichita County Water Improvement District No. 2, 129 Tex. 70, 103 S.W.2d 135, 112 A.L.R. 70, in bar of the allegations in the instant suit and filed other exceptions to appellant’s original petition.

On June 14, 1947, appellant filed her first amended original petition and again on June 24 of the same year filed her second amended original petition. To these petitions the appellee filed its various exceptions, which were sustained by the court, and on July 9, 1947 the court, after sustaining such exceptions, dismissed the suit with prejudice, from which judgment the appellant did not give notice of appeal.

On July 14, 1947 the appellant requested the court to grant her leave to file her third amended original petition. This was some five days after the court had entered its final judgment. The court having that in mind refused to grant such privilege and entered the following order, to-wit: “The plaintiff’s request for leave to file her Third Amended Original Petition herein *704is hereby refused. This the 14th day of July, 1947. To which action the plaintiff excepted and gave notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District sitting at Fort Worth, Texas. H. W. Fillmore, Judge.”

We find therefore that the appellant gave notice of appeal from the order disallowing the filing of her third amended original petition and that she did not give notice of appeal from the final judgment in the case. She submits as a basis for her appeal the following:

> “1. The plaintiffs’ Second -Amended Original Petition stated a cause of action, and the court, therefore, erred in sustaining the exceptions and in dismissing the case.

> "2. The court erred in dismissing the case without affording the plaintiffs an opportunity to amend.”

Since we have found that no notice of appeal was given from the final judgment and that such notice of appeal is mandatory, the appellate court acquired no jurisdiction other than to .dismiss the appeal. Rule 353, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and Backus v. Roper, Tex.Civ.App., 195 S.W.2d 261.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                         
<ARTICLE>                      5                    
<LEGEND>                                                       
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>                                                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000    
                                                               
<S>                                        <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS                 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-25-1996          
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-25-1995           
<CASH>                                          29,517            
<SECURITIES>                                         0            
<RECEIVABLES>                                  331,238            
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,409             
<INVENTORY>                                    276,306             
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               678,155             
<PP&E>                                         647,061             
<DEPRECIATION>                                 369,898            
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,255,442             
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          329,119             
<BONDS>                                        153,334             
<COMMON>                                       226,017             
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0             
<PREFERRED>                                          0             
<OTHER-SE>                                     423,885             
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,255,442             
<SALES>                                              0             
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               844,620             
<CGS>                                                0             
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  489,250             
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0             
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0             
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,989             
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 69,972             
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,992             
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,980             
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0             
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0             
<CHANGES>                                            0             
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,980             
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47          
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.47             
                                                               

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 23.01 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3
(No. 33-77008) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-63393, 333-77879, 333-86069, 333-86071, 333-30512, and
333-119152) of CSK Auto Corporation of our report dated May 2, 2005 relating to the consolidated
financial statements, financial statement schedules, managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
May 2, 2005
#### Merriel JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 25481.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 10, 1951.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The appeal is from a conviction of murder. The punishment was assessed by the jury at IS years in the penitentiary.

The record contains an affidavit, in proper form, requesting that the court dismiss, the appeal. Appellant’s request is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

MAURICE HARPER, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 98 EM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 6th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2926 

To prohibit the revocation or withholding of Federal funds to programs 

whose participants carry out voluntary religious activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Mr. ALEXANDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit the revocation or withholding of Federal funds 

to programs whose participants carry out voluntary religious activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom to Pray Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON WITHHOLDING FEDERAL FUNDS 

6 TO PROGRAMS WHOSE PARTICIPANTS CON7 DUCT VOLUNTARY RELIGIOUS ACTIVITIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for the Fed9 eral Government to revoke or withhold Federal financial 

10 assistance that would otherwise be provided to any recipiVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:37 Aug 06, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2926.IH H2926

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2926 IH

1 ent of such assistance on the basis of religious activities 

2 that are conducted voluntarily and initiated by partici3 pants in a program or activity carried out by such recipi4 ent. 

5 (b) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

6 shall be construed to authorize the United States or any 

7 State or political subdivision thereof— 

8 (1) to sponsor a religious activity; 

9 (2) to prohibit a recipient of Federal financial 

10 assistance from ensuring that a religious activity 

11 does not materially and substantially interfere with 

12 the orderly conduct of the program or activities car13 ried out by such recipient; 

14 (3) to require any person to participate in pray15 er or other religious activity; or 

16 (4) to compel any employee or agent of a pro17 gram or activity that is carried out by a recipient of 

18 Federal financial assistance to participate in an ac19 tivity if the content of the speech at the activity is 

20 contrary to the beliefs of the employee or agent. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2977 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2977

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
  coverage, as supplies associated with the injection of insulin, of 
 containment, removal, decontamination and disposal of home-generated 
    needles, syringes, and other sharps through a sharps container, 
   decontamination/destruction device, or sharps-by-mail program or 
         similar program under part D of the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2013

 Mr. Whitfield (for himself and Ms. DeGette) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 
  in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
  coverage, as supplies associated with the injection of insulin, of 
 containment, removal, decontamination and disposal of home-generated 
    needles, syringes, and other sharps through a sharps container, 
   decontamination/destruction device, or sharps-by-mail program or 
         similar program under part D of the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Safe Needle Disposal 
Coverage Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF CONTAINMENT, REMOVAL, DECONTAMINATION AND DISPOSAL 
              OF HOME-GENERATED NEEDLES, SYRINGES, AND OTHER SHARPS 
              THROUGH A SHARPS CONTAINER, DECONTAMINATION/DESTRUCTION 
              DEVICE, OR SHARPS-BY-MAIL PROGRAM OR SIMILAR PROGRAM 
              UNDER MEDICARE PART D.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860D-2(e)(1)(B) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-102(e)(1)(B)) is amended by inserting after 
``regulations of the Secretary'' the following: ``and including devices 
approved for home use by the Food and Drug Administration for the safe 
and effective containment, removal, decontamination and disposal of 
home-generated needles, syringes, and other sharps through a sharps 
container, decontamination/destruction device, or sharps-by-mail 
program or similar program''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on January 1, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
From: Culligan, Kevin [mailto:Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:13 AM
To: Higgins, Cortney
Cc: Wayland, Robertj Subject: Re: Current version of 111(d) preamble

I am working on getting you a timeframe on both TSDs. The RE is a stand-alone document.

From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:09:09 AM
To: Culligan, Kevin
Cc: Wayland, Robertj Subject: RE: Current version of 111(d) preamble

Specifically, there is a reference to an Alternat ive RE Approach TSD. When will we see that TSD, or has it been incorporated into the abatement TSD already (and if so, where)?

Thanks on the legal memo.

From: Culligan, Kevin [mailto:Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:07 AM
To: Higgins, Cortney
Cc: Wayland, Robertj Subject: Re: Current version of 111(d) preamble

We are working as hard as we can on the legal TSD. As early tomorrow as possible.

I will get you a page number shortly, but the RE discussion is in Section VI.From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:04:35 AM
To: Culligan, Kevin
Cc: Wayland, Robertj Subject: RE: Current version of 111(d) preamble

Hi Kevin,

Where can readers find the new RE approach referenced in 2?

Also, I left you a voicemail, but any idea on when the revised legal memo will be ready/shared with us?

Regards, Cortney

From: Culligan, Kevin [mailto:Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:16 PM
To: Higgins, Cortney
Cc: Wayland, Robertj Subject: Current version of 111(d) preamble

I believe this addresses most of the big ticket items:

1. take comment on new 2025 option that is more stringent 2. take comment on new RE approach 3. request comment on new NGCC as BSER 4. remove requested langauge related to 75% in the above 70% option.

We are working on a version with bubble responses and a response to the list of written comments. Will get as soon as possible.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
10QSB REPORT FOR THE QUARTER AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10QSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000095898
<NAME> SWISS CHALET , INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,755,501
<SECURITIES>                                 1,004,642
<RECEIVABLES>                                  243,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     37,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,072,349
<PP&E>                                       5,849,503
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,882,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,107,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          735,264
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       700,581
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,613,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,107,641
<SALES>                                      1,069,226
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,174,401
<CGS>                                           19,192
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               866,674
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                288,535
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            288,535
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   288,535
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      In connection with the quarterly report of Tecumseh Products Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
James S. Nicholson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:   August 6, 2004               BY:         /s/ JAMES S. NICHOLSON
                                          --------------------------------------
                                              James S. Nicholson
                                                 Vice President, Treasurer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 26228.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 28, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*401DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The offense is the driving, while intoxicated, upon a public highway; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001051904
<NAME>                        FRISBY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,171,579
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,909,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (60,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    1,097,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,677,884
<PP&E>                                         1,030,023
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (425,102)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,419,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,721,079
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,748
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,272,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,419,847
<SALES>                                        5,528,437
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,237,900
<CGS>                                          4,490,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,196,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,847,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (178,679)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,628,306)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,628,306)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,628,306)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.01)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2720]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 3, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Central Financial Corporation, Hutchinson, Kansas; to acquire 
8.34 percent of the voting shares of NorthStar Bancshares, Inc., 
Riverside, Missouri, and thereby acquire shares of NorthStar Bank, 
N.A., Kansas City, Missouri.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, 
Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 
94105-1579:
    1. FNB Bancorp, Layton, Utah; to become a bank holding company by 
acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of First National Bank of 
Layton, Layton, Utah.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 2, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-2720 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P