alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30624 Summary Calendar

ROBERT DEEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ROXIE F. GOYNES-CLARK; KIMBERLY LEMAIRE; WILLIAM L. KLINE; JOHNNY CREED; RICHARD L. STALDER, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections; STATE SELF INSURANCE FUND, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-648-C

-------------------- February 4, 2000 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Robert Deemer, Louisiana state prisoner #120219, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights suit as frivolous. He argues that the defendants filed false documents in a state-court proceeding, that defendant Stalder subjected him to rules that Stalder lacked the authority to enact, that he was denied access to the Administrative Remedy Procedure, that Stalder violated his right to equal protection under the law byNo. 99-30624 -2- discriminating against him because he was housed in extended lockdown, that his good-time credits were improperly revoked, and that defendant Creed improperly failed to take administrative action and sanctioned the taking of Deemer’s property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Deemer’s complaint as frivolous. See Siglar v. Hightower , 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Swank, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report"), the undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 11, 2005  |  | /s/ John Tulin                          
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                        |  |                                         
|                        |  | John Tulin, President                   
|                        |  | (Chief Executive Officer)               
|                        |  |                                         
|                        |  |                                         
|Dated:  August 11, 2005 |  | /s/ Jerold R. Kassner                   
|                        |  |                                         
|                        |  | Jerold R. Kassner, Senior Vice President
|                        |  | and Treasurer                           
|                        |  | (Chief Financial Officer)               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Swank, Inc. and will be retained by Swank, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### LEWIS v. STATE.

No. 21856.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 21, 1942.

Harvey W. Lindsay, of Dallas, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record before us shows no notice of appeal. Such 'notice is indispensable to give this court jurisdiction. See Art. 827, C.C.P., and cases cited in Note 2 under said article.

The appeal is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         308,534
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,664,522
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (110,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,007,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,126,069
<PP&E>                                       8,966,331
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,600,358)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,500,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,426,828
<BONDS>                                      3,335,655
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        125
<COMMON>                                         3,606
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,734,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,500,608
<SALES>                                      6,824,986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,824,986
<CGS>                                        3,529,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,085,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (114,275)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             311,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,513
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 72236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30245]

[[Page 72236]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7693]

Foreign Affairs Policy Board Meeting Notice; Closed Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 10(a)(2), the Department of State 
announces a meeting of the Foreign Affairs Policy Board to take place 
on December 19, 2011, at the Department of State, Washington, DC.
    The Foreign Affairs Policy Board reviews and assesses: (1) Global 
threats and opportunities; (2) trends that implicate core national 
security interests; (3) tools and capacities of the civilian foreign 
affairs agencies; and (4) priorities and strategic frameworks for U.S. 
foreign policy. Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has 
been determined that this meeting will be closed to the public as the 
Board will be reviewing and discussing matters properly classified in 
accordance with Executive Order 13526.
    For more information, contact Samantha Raddatz at (202) 647-2372.

     Dated: November 16, 2011.
Dan Kurtz-Phelan,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-30245 Filed 11-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Thomas S. Smith, President and a Director of Superior Silver Mines, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 12, 2010

By:    /s/ Thomas S. Smith

Thomas S. Smith, President and Director



---
Exhibit 23.1

                     INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

To the Board of Directors
GSV, Inc. and subsidiaries
Westport, Connecticut

We hereby  consent to  incorporation  by  reference  in  Registration  Statement
Numbers  333-75159  and 333-91575 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 29, 2006
on the  consolidated  balance sheet of GSV, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December
31, 2005 and the  related  consolidated  statements  of  operations,  changes of
stockholders'  equity and cash flows for the years ended  December  31, 2005 and
2004, which appear in the December 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of GSV,
Inc.

Comiskey & Company, P.C.
Denver, Colorado
March 31, 2006
#### NUTT v. STATE.

No. 22197.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 17, 1942.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for cattle theft, the punishment assessed being two years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

*198The record is before us without statement of facts or hills of exception. All matters of procedure appear regular. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial co'urt is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the ■ Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131380 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131380 COA: 259720 Monroe CC: 04-033590-FC RENODDA DARR ELL HICKS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 25, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
#### DOMINGUEZ v. STATE.

No. 22862.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 17, 1944.

Letcher D. King, of Abilene, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty to the offense of unlawfully carrying a pistol, appellant was aásessed punishment at a fine of $100.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 31.2
   (1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Technical
Communications Corporation;(2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
 (5)
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ Michael P. Malone

Michael P. Malone
Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 11, 2008
Amendment to Code of Requlations



 EXHIBIT 10.03 
 The board of directors of The E. W. Scripps Company approved the following resolution on February 23, 2006. 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to allow for uncertificated share registration of shares by shareholders as an alternative to receiving a stock certificate; 
 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the company’s Code of Regulations, Article VI (Certificates for Shares), shall be amended to read as follows: 
 Section 1. Form and Execution. 
 (A) Certificates for shares, certifying the number of full-paid shares owned, shall be issued to each shareholder who chooses to receive a
certificate, in such form as shall be approved by the board of directors. Such certificates shall be signed by the chairman of the board of directors or the president or a vice president and by the secretary or an assistant secretary or the
treasurer or an assistant treasurer; provided, however, that if such certificates are countersigned by an incorporated transfer agent or registrar the signatures of any of such officers and the seal of the Corporation upon such certificates may be
facsimiled, engraved, stamped or printed. If any officer or officers who shall have signed, or whose facsimile signature shall have been used, printed or stamped on any certificate or certificates for shares, shall cease to be such officer or
officers, because of death, resignation or otherwise, before such certificate or certificates shall have been delivered by the Corporation, such certificate or certificates if authenticated by the endorsement thereon of the signature of a transfer
agent or registrar shall nevertheless be as effective in all respects when delivered as though signed by a duly elected, qualified and authorized officer or officers, and as though the person or persons who signed such certificate or certificates,
or whose facsimile signature or signatures shall have been used thereon, had not ceased to be an officer or officers of the Corporation. 
 (B) As an alternative to receiving a stock certificate, a shareholder may choose to have shares registered through an uncertificated share registration system. 
 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company be, and they are hereby, authorized, empowered and directed to take all further action or to do
all other things that they deem necessary and desirable in connection with or to effectuate the foregoing resolution. 
  

 8
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-KSB
Year ended December 31, 2006
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
  [This paragraph intentionally left blank.]
   5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   By: /s/ Cynthia A. Mahl
    
    Date: March 29, 2007Cynthia A. Mahl, Senior Vice President and CFO
exv10w11



 



 






Exhibit 10.11




Summary of 2006 Compensation for Named Executive Officers




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Executive Officer	 	Salary (1)	 	Bonus (2)	 	Stock Options (3)	 	Performance
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Award (4)
	 	 	($)	 	($)	 	Value at grant ($)	 	Value at grant ($)
	Sidney Taurel
	 	$	1,650,333	 	 	$	2,062,917	 	 	$	3,600,000	 	 	$	3,600,000	 
	Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	John C. Lechleiter, Ph.D.
	 	$	1,112,000	 	 	$	1,112,000	 	 	$	2,340,000	 	 	$	2,340,000	 
	President and Chief
Operating Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Steven M. Paul, M.D.
	 	$	916,167	 	 	$	778,742	 	 	$	1,200,000	 	 	$	1,200,000	 
	Executive Vice
President, Science
and Technology
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Charles E. Golden
	 	$	857,700	 	 	$	729,045	 	 	$	1,100,000	 	 	$	1,100,000	 
	Executive Vice
President and Chief
Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Robert A. Armitage
	 	$	701,657	 	 	$	526,243	 	 	$	900,000	 	 	$	900,000	 
	Senior Vice President
and General Counsel
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 





 






	(1)	 	Expected base salary for the full year 2006 assuming individual is employed for the full
year. However, it is noted that Charles E. Golden has announced his intent to retire as of
April 30, 2006, in which event his salary, bonus and performance award would be reduced
accordingly and his 2006 stock option would terminate without vesting.
	 
	(2)	 	Target bonus under the Eli Lilly and Company Bonus Plan for 2006 assuming individual is
employed for the full year. Actual bonuses earned may vary from zero to 200 percent of the
target amount, depending on the company’s 2006 results relative to predetermined corporate
performance measures that are based 25 percent on sales growth and 75 percent on
earnings-per-share growth (adjusted for unusual items in accordance with predetermined
criteria).
	 
	(3)	 	The options will vest three years from the grant date and expire ten years from the grant
date. The exercise price is the market value of Lilly stock on the grant date. The number of shares
granted will be determined as of the grant date based on the values listed
above, the share price on the grant date, and the company’s lattice valuation method for stock
options.
	 
	(4)	 	Target payout under the performance award program for 2006. Actual payouts earned for 2006
may vary from zero to 200 percent of the target amount, depending on the growth in the
company’s 2006 earnings per share (adjusted for unusual items in accordance with predetermined
criteria). The
present values listed above will be converted to shares based on 100 percent of the market value
of Lilly stock on the grant date. The shares will be paid in the form of restricted stock
vesting in 2008.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Charles M. Weaver, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
            Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, CIT Capital Trust I
            Securities-Backed Series 2002-15 Trust (the "Trust") and all
            reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports
            of the Trust filed in respect of periods included in the year
            covered by this annual report of the Trust;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
            a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
            or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered
            by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
            required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
            pooling and servicing or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
            reports is included in these reports; and

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or
            similar agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual
            compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
            disclosed in the reports, the Depositor and Trustee have each
            fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.



Date: March 28, 2005


         /s/ Charles M. Weaver
--------------------------------------------
Charles M. Weaver, Vice President