alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 12-20-00239-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF D.B.I.,

A JUVENILE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 273RD 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SHELBY COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant, D.B.I., filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by 

Appellant and Appellant’s counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, 

Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a).

Opinion delivered March 18, 2021. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MARCH 18, 2021

NO. 12-20-00239-CV

IN THE MATTER OF D.B.I., A JUVENILE

Appeal from the 273rd District Court

of Shelby County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 17NJ640)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration

                    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the Working Group of the Advisory Committee on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans studying benefit continuity after organizational restructuring will hold an open public meeting on Tuesday, November 14, 2000, in Room N-5437                           ( print page 63625)                        A-C, U.S. Department of Labor Building, Second and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington D.C. 20210.                

The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 9:30 a.m. to approximately noon, is for Working Group members to finalize the recommendations to be included in their report.

Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement pertaining to the topic by submitting 20 copies on or before November 6, 2000, to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5677, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20210. Individuals or representatives of organizations wishing to address the Working Group should forward their request to the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations will be limited to 10 minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities, who need special accommodations, should contact Sharon Morrissey by November 6,  at the address indicated in this notice.

Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the meeting  if received on or before November 6.

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 19th day of October, 2000.

Leslie Kramerich,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-27259 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 09

- 00158

- CR

No. 10

- 09

- 00159

- CR

EX PARTE WILLIAM JOH NSON

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No s

. 24632 and 24634

MEMORANDUM OPINION

We withdraw the opinion and judgment issued in t hese proceedings dated July

22, 2009, and issue this opinion and judgment dated August 5, 2009

.

William Johnson filed notices of appeal with this Court regarding two writ of

habeas corpus proceedings filed in the trial court. After the notice s of appeal were filed,

the Court was informed that Johnson received all the relief he requested by the petitions

for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court. If Johnson received the relief requested, it

would make the appeals moot and we would be without jurisdicti on to decide any

issue.

The Clerk of this Court notified Johnson by letter that we questioned our

jurisdiction. In the same letter, the Clerk warned Johnson that the Court would dismissEx parte Johnson Page 2

the appeal s unless, within 21 days from the date of the letter, a re sponse was filed

showing grounds for continuing the appeal s . Johnson has not provided a response.

Accordingly, th ese appeal s are dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 44.3.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeals dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 5 , 2009

Do not publish

[CR25]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM TECH-SYM CORPORATION FORM 10-Q SECOND QUARTER 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,390
<SECURITIES>                                       139
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (178)
<INVENTORY>                                     27,370
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,775
<PP&E>                                          73,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,349
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           807
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,737
<SALES>                                         73,327
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,327
<CGS>                                           54,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   412
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,001)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (320)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (681)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (19,146)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (19,827)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (3.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.29)


</TABLE>
#### The State, ex rel. Upper Scioto Drainage & Conservancy District, *v.*Ferguson, Aud. of State.

(No. 27832

Decided November 8, 1939.)

*Mr. Hamilton E. Hoge*and *Messrs. Stillings & Hanna,*for relator.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, for respondent.

Writ allowed by agreement of counsel.

*Writ allowed.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP01-44-000]

Take notice that on October 13, 2000, Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. (Iroquois) tendered for filing a request for an exemption from the imbalance trading requirement established in Order No. 587-L. 

Iroquois states that its request is made pursuant to the Commission's September 28, 2000 Order in Docket No. RM96-1-016 (92 FERC ¶ 61,266). 

Iroquois states that copies of its filing were served on all jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions. 

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before October 25, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www/​ferc./​fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 

David P. Boergers 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-27267  Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01­-M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3068 

Relating to members of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa 

Indians of Michigan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2013 

Mr. BENISHEK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

Relating to members of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa 

and Chippewa Indians of Michigan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL REFERENCE AND REPORT. 

4 Pursuant to the findings and conclusions contained 

5 in the Report issued by the chief judge of the U.S. Court 

6 of Federal Claims, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 

7 pay, out of money not otherwise appropriated, to members 

8 of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa In9 dians of Michigan, the sum of $ llll, and to the 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3068 IH

1 Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians 

2 of Michigan, the sum of $ llll. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[No. 35360.

Department One.

April 7, 1960.]

#### James E. Bunch *et al., Appellants,*v. Leo Gutzwiler *et al., Respondents.**1*

*Chaffee & Aiken,*for appellants.

*Blechschmidt & McKenzie,*for respondents.

1

Reported in 350 P. (2d) 1015.

Per Curiam.

— This appeal presented a single question of fact for decision. The plaintiffs predicated their action upon the defendant Leo Gutzwiler being their agent. The trial court dismissed the action upon the ground that he was not their agent. The plaintiffs appeal.

The background of this action is that the business of supplying bees for pollenization of fruit trees in the Wenatchee and Yakima orchards was begun in the early 1930s. The first suppliers of bees were C. H. Schader, who operated around Yakima, and Paul and Urban Mangold, who worked out of Wenatchee. Schader’s chief . operation was the growing and supplying of bees to distributors, while the Mangolds rented most of their bees and distributed them to orchardists.

In 1941, Schader orally agreed to supply the Mangolds with all the bees they needed. This informal arrangement continued for over fifteen years.

Urban Mangold died in 1951, and Paul Mangold turned the business over to his nephew, respondent Leo Gutzwiler, in 1953. The following year, Schader sold his business to the appellants. The appellants continued to supply bees to the respondent Leo Gutzwiler. These parties did not enter into a written contract, but the prior long-standing arrangement worked satisfactorily until 1958, when respondent Leo Gutzwiler became dissatisfied with the quality of the appellants’ bees. Finally, on April 11, 1959, he informed the appellants that he was going to discontinue renting bees from them and would procure his future supply from the respondent Lyle Hibbard.

Thereupon, the appellants took the position that respondent Leo Gutzwiler was their agent and, upon that basis, sought, by this action, to enjoin him from renting bees from anyone other than the appellants and to require him to turn over all his business records and customer lists, which he held as their agent. They also sought to enjoin respondent Lyle Hibbard from renting bees to respondent Leo Gutzwiler on the theory that he had conspired to deprive the appellants of their business.

The trial court found that the respondent Leo Gutzwiler was not the agent of the appellants; that he was engaged in his own business; that his relationship to the appellants was that of an independent contractor; and that there was no conspiracy. The findings are supported by the *964record. It follows, as a correct conclusion of law, that the appellants are not entitled to any of the relief prayed for.

The judgment is affirmed.

June 17, 1960. Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 10.2(p)

                     RULES OF GENERAL APPLICATION UNDER THE
                           CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC. 1993
                         STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN
                               (Adopted 2/9/2006)


Rule 4.   This  Rule  applies  to stock  options  granted  to  employees  of the
Corporation and its subsidiaries by, or under the authority of, the Compensation
and Management Development Committee (the "Committee").

     The  provision in certain  options which states that the last date on which
     the option may be exercised  after the  termination of employment by reason
     of  death,  disability  or  retirement  on or after age 55 with ten or more
     years of service  shall be "until one year after the last date on which any
     options  granted  to  you  by  the  Company,  which  are  not  subsequently
     cancelled,  become fully  exercisable"  shall be interpreted to mean "until
     one year after the last date on which any options or SARs granted to you by
     the  Company,   which  are  not   subsequently   cancelled,   become  fully
     exercisable."

This Rule does not apply options granted on or after February 9, 2006.
# Memorandum

To: Line Department Personnel 

### CC: Steve Desrosiers, Kevin Putnam From: 

### Mike Del..aria 

### Date: 

### 4/24/2014 Re: Policy Regarding Taxi-Lane Object Free Areas (Gate 2. Gate 3, North /South Taxi-Lane
The policy regarding the Object free areas is 

### as follows; Every business o'vner. aircraft owner andior chiefpilot on Norwood Municipal Airport is aware that parking and leaving 

### an aircraft within the taxi-lanes (gate 

### 2, gate 

### 3 or the north/south taxi-lane). whether for fuel or otherwise, is prohibited. 

### It is the responsibility ofFiightLevel to ensure that this policy is strictlyenforced, and that no fueling will take place in any ofthe above mentioned areas. Due to d1e imp01tance ofthis matter FlightLevel has instituted the fbllowing Policy effective immediately. 

### Ifany FlightLevel Line Person knowingly disregards this policy and after managements review and findings, the following actions be 

### may be levied againstthat individual after 

### all the facts have been reviewed.. First Offense -· Two week suspension without pay Second Offense - Immediate termination.



### 1
EXHIBIT A

Case 1:20-cv-00662-RP Document 1-1 Filed 06/25/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-00662-RP Document 1-1 Filed 06/25/20 Page 2 of 2
#### IN RE EDEN F. ET AL.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15965.

*Benjamin*Zivyon, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition.

*Roger E. Bunker,*in opposition.

Decided July 2, 1998

The petition by the commissioner of children and families for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 290 (AC 16417), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) the petitioner, the commissioner of children and families, was required to prove that she had made reasonable efforts to reunite both children with the respondent mother; and (2) the trial court’s findings in this respect were clearly erroneous?”
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 297 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 297

   To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize support for 
      graduate medical education programs in children's hospitals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2013

   Mr. Pitts (for himself, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Burgess, and Mrs. Capps) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize support for 
      graduate medical education programs in children's hospitals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Children's Hospital GME Support 
Reauthorization Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM OF PAYMENTS TO CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS THAT OPERATE 
              GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 340E of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 256e) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``through 2005 and each 
        of fiscal years 2007 through 2011'' and inserting ``through 
        2005, each of fiscal years 2007 through 2011, and each of 
        fiscal years 2013 through 2017'';
            (2) in subsection (f)(1)(A)(iv), by inserting ``and each of 
        fiscal years 2013 through 2017'' after ``2011''; and
            (3) in subsection (f)(2)(D), by inserting ``and each of 
        fiscal years 2013 through 2017'' after ``2011''.
    (b) Report to Congress.--Section 340E(b)(3)(D) of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256e(b)(3)(D)) is amended by striking ``Not 
later than the end of fiscal year 2011'' and inserting ``Not later than 
the end of fiscal year 2016''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned President & Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies that, to their knowledge:



1) the Companys Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December 27, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2) the information contained in the Companys Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended December 27, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                       |  |  |  |                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       |  |  |  |                                                        
|                                                       |  | 
|/s/    CARL H. GUILD, JR.                              |  |  |  | /s/    MICHAEL P. MALONE                               
|                                                       |  |  |  |                                                        
|Carl H. Guild, Jr. President & Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Michael P. Malone Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                       |  | 
|Date: February 9, 2004                                 |  |  |  | Date: February 9, 2004
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER TO R EINSTATE

Appellate case name: James L. Menefee v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 09

- 00090

- CR ; 01

- 09

- 00091

- CR

Trial court case number: 1153928 ; 1153929

Trial court: 183rd District Court of Harris County

Th e s e case s w ere abated and remanded to the trial court on July 20, 2012. In the order of

abatement, we ordered the trial court to appoint appellate counsel to represent appellant. The

trial court held a hearing on our order of abatement on August 20, 2012, and the court reporter

has filed a record of the hearing. The reporter’s record shows that the trial court appointed

Thomas Lewis to represent appellant. Accordingly, we REINSTATE th e s e case s on the Court’s

active docket.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed no later than September 19, 2012

. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the filing of

appellant’s brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Jim Sharp, Jr.

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 22, 2012