alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|    |                                                                                               |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of First Niagara Financial Group, Inc.; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;                                  |

|                      |
|----------------------|
|                      |  |
| Date: April 29, 2016 | /s/ Gary M. Crosby |
|                 | Gary M. Crosby |
|                 | President and Chief Executive Officer |
#### BEASLEY v. STATE.

No. 22212.

Court of Criminal. Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 21, 1942.

Alex P. Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for murder, punishment being three years in the penitentiary.

The original transcript contained no notice of appeal. Upon having his attention called to this the District Clerk sent up a supplemental transcript which contains the following memorandum:

> “The State of Texas vs. J. L. Beasley. In the District Court of Cherokee County, Texas.

> “Notice of appeal filed Feb. 2, 1942.

> “Defendant’s motion for new trial overruled, defendant excepts, and is given 90 days in which to perfect record for appeal.

> “J. W. Chandler,

> “Judge Presiding, Cherokee County,

> “2nd Judicial District, Texas.”

There is nothing in the foregoing to show that a notice of appeal was given and carried forward into the court minutes as is required by Art. 827, C.C.P. See cases annotated under said article in Volume 3, Vernon’s Tex.C.C.P. It has been held many times that even a docket entry of notice of appeal is not sufficient.

If the foregoing memorandum, or whatever it may be termed, was only signed by the trial judge and filed with the papers in the cause, it would not be a compliance with said Art. 827, even if it contained a notice of appeal, which it does not.

The appeal is dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-KSB
Year ended December 31, 2007
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:
     5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   By:
    
    /s/ Cynthia A. Mahl
    
    Date: March 28, 2008Cynthia A. Mahl, Senior Vice President and CFO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0369

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

MALCOLM JOSEPH NEWROBE, SR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until February 24, 2021, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 12 2021

01/12/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0369
#### COX et al. v. PALACIOS.

No. 11521.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 13, 1945.

Perkins *&*Floyd, of Alice, for appellants.

Lloyd & Lloyd, of Alice, for appellee.

*689NORVELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a plea of privilege. The plea was properly overruled under the provisions of exception 14 of Article 1995, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats. The opinion of this Court in the recent case of Cox et al. v. Chapa, Tex.Civ.App., 188 S.W.2d 217, is controlling here. The allegations of Pala-cios’ petition with reference to damages to land are practically identical with those contained in the petition in the Chapa case. Under exception 14, the venue fact which must be established by evidence is that the land is situated in the county where the suit is brought. That was done in this case. Whether or not a suit is one for the “recovery of lands or damages thereto” is a matter to be determined by allegations of the petition. The venue inquiry under exception 14 is restricted to the nature or character of the suit, and is not directed to the question of whether or not a cause of action exists in fact. In this particular, exception 14 differs from certain other exceptions set out in Article 1995. In order to maintain venue in Duval County, Pala-cios was not called upon to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he had in fact suffered an injury to his land. He alleged that he did and his right to maintain the suit in the county where the land is situated was not defeated by his failure to prove upon the plea of privilege hearing that his land had in fact been damaged.

The order appealed from is affirmed.
Table 2. Distribution of TIN Costs and Benchmarks - All TINs with 1+ EPs

5% 10%

Cost per Capita 137,694 $9,690 $7,778 $52 $1,999 $3,099 Specialty-Adjusted Benchmark weighted by % EPs 137,694 $10,153 $7,890 $53 $2,274 $3,590 weighted by % Charges 137,694 $10,173 $7,884 $53 $2,277 $3,605 Specialty-Adjusted Cost per Capita weighted by % EPs 137,694 $10,079 $1,026 $6,381 $7,677 $8,923 weighted by % Charges 137,694 $10,056 $1,069 $6,381 $7,677 $8,658 Percentiles TIN Measure # TINs Mean StDev Min25% 50% 75% 90% 95% 99%

$5,794 $8,860 $11,426 $15,525 $20,153 $37,804$314,472

$6,437 $9,268 $11,815 $15,949 $20,574 $38,619 $322,778 $6,480 $9,288 $11,843 $15,938 $20,562 $38,660$322,778

$9,792 $10,435 $10,702 $10,767 $10,993 $12,434 $14,064 $9,775 $10,438 $10,716 $10,767 $10,993 $12,506 $14,064

Percentiles Max
exv10w1



 






	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.1 Summary Sheet: Named Executive Officer Base Salaries 2006




Base Salaries for 2006 for the Named Executive Officers




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Title	2006 Base Salary
	William J. Oddy

	 	Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	682,500	 
	James W. Noyce

	 	Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Administrative Officer
	 	$	461,100	 
	Stephen M. Morain

	 	Senior Vice President and General
Counsel
	 	$	428,200	 
	Bruce A. Trost

	 	Executive Vice President – P/C

Companies
	 	$	355,100	 
	JoAnn W. Rumelhart

	 	Executive Vice President – Farm

Bureau Life
	 	$	348,400	 






4
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3027 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3027

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 442 Miller Valley Road in Prescott, Arizona, as the ``Barry M. 
                        Goldwater Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BARRY M. GOLDWATER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 442 Miller Valley Road in Prescott, Arizona, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Barry M. Goldwater Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Barry M. 
Goldwater Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the quarterly report of Tecumseh Products Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
Edwin L. Buker, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: May 8, 2008                      BY: /s/ EDWIN L. BUKER
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Edwin L. Buker
                                            Chairman, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                        National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group Subcommittee F—Manpower & Training.                    

*Date:*                        November 15-17, 2000.                    

*Time:*                        8:00 am to 12:00 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                        Georgetown Holiday Inn, 2101 Wisconsin Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20007.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mary Bell, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, PHS, DHHS, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8113, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, 301-496-7978.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 62740)    
Dated: October 11, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-26870  Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 52 
          - [MO 110-1110a; FRL-6889-9] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Proposed action. 

# SUMMARY:

EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the state of Missouri pertaining to the adoption of a statewide visible emissions rule, and the rescission of four areawide visible emissions rules. 

                        In the final rules section of the                         **Federal Register**                        , EPA is approving the state's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no relevant adverse comments to this action. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated in relation to this action. If EPA receives relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.                     

# DATES:

Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by November 27, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

Comments may be mailed to Wayne Kaiser, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wayne Kaiser at (913) 551-7603. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    See the information provided in the direct final rule which is located in the rules section of the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated: October 6, 2000. 

William Rice, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

[FR Doc. 00-27145 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

AUGUST 24, 2015 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b). 

1. Case No. SD33445 

 Re: DARRELL TINDLE, 

 Appellant, 

 vs. 

 STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Respondent.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense.


Change in Meeting Date of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron 
Devices

AGENCY: Advisory Group on Electron Devices, Department of Defense

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group B (Microelectronics) of the DoD Advisory Group 
on Electron (AGED) announces a change to a closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Thursday, November 30, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elise Rabin, AGED Secretariat, 1745 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, 
Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E), 
and through the DDR&E, to the Director Defense Advanced Research 
Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and managing 
an effective research and development program in the field of electron 
devices.
    The Working Group B meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development programs which the military proposes to initiate with 
industry, universities or in their laboratories. The microelectronics 
area includes such programs on semiconductor materials, integrated 
circuits, charge coupled devices and memories. The review will include 
classified program details throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. Sec. 10(d)(1994)), it has been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(1)(1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to 
the public.

    Dated: October 17, 2000.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-27200 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
#### Hubbuch, Appellant, *v.*City of Springfield et al., Appellees.

(No. 27771

Decided November 15, 1939.)

*Messrs. Anderson, McKee & ScJmer, Mr. Harry Kohn*and *Mr. William Wasserstrom,*for appellant.

*Mr. Fred N. Carpenter,*city solicitor, and *Mr. Jerome A. Nevius,*prosecuting attorney, for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2730 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to minimum levels 

of financial responsibility for the transportation of property, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2013 

Mr. CARTWRIGHT (for himself, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. 

SIRES, Mr. LEWIS, Mr. FATTAH, and Mr. SCOTT of Virginia) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to 

minimum levels of financial responsibility for the transportation of property, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe And Fair Envi5 ronment on Highways Achieved through Underwriting 

6 Levels Act of 2013’’ or the ‘‘SAFE HAUL Act of 2013’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2730 IH

1 SEC. 2. MINIMUM FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRANS2 PORTING PROPERTY. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 31139(b)(2) of title 49, 

4 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘$750,000.’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘$4,422,000 and the Secretary, in consulta6 tion with the Bureau of Labor Statistics, shall adjust such 

7 amount annually for inflation relating to medical care.’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall take effect on the date that is 180 days 

10 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### GARZA v. STATE.

No. 23063.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 14, 1945.

Nago L. Alanis, of San Diego, and J. Earl Barnhouse, of Alice, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

■ The offense is theft of chickens. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of one year and a day.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, and the indictment appears to be in due form. Consequently there is nothing presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.