# Ohio Air Monitoring Network 20 1 1

- 20 1 2 6/1 7 /11

Requirements

As required by 40 CFR 58.10

, Ohio EPA is providing an annual monitoring network plan for

public review and comments. Ohio EPA will submit this plan with comments to the US EPA

Region V Regiona l Administrator. There will be a 30 day comment period for the public to

make comments on the plan and those comments will also be submitted to Region V. The

Ohio Air Monitoring Network as it exists as of July 1 , 20 1 1 is included in the accompanying

tabl e.

Changes

The plan for Ohio’s Air Monitoring Network for 20 1 1

- 20 1 2 is to make changes as required

or necessary for the air monitoring network. In 2011 Ohio and other states were required to

consider addition al lead sampling sites based upon modeling r esults of Ohio facilities with

emissions of one half

- ton of airborne lead emissions per year

. The results of that modeling

and the requests for waivers from sampling are included in a separate report under Ohio Lead

Monitoring Plans 2011

- 2012 at:

h ttp://ww w.epa.state.oh.us/portals/27/ams/plans/OhioLeadMonitoring.pdf

The Lead Monitoring Plans were made available to the public on May 11, 2011 for review

and comment.

For sites that monitor for very fine particulate matter or PM2.5, Ohio EPA expects to

conti nue with monitoring or sampling for the PM2.5 Federal Reference Method at most of

the sites as they existed at the beginning of 20 1 1

. Some changes that are not noted in these

plans that will be posted by July 1, 2011 could occur based upon the change in f unding from

103 funds to 105 funds. Some Ohio local air agencies and the state district office PM2.5

sampling may result in fewer sites or monitors to operate because of reduced funding

availability.

The ozone monitoring sites will have only a few chan ges for 20 1 1

. While we anticipate that

the NAAQS for ozone will be made more stringent in 2011 an analysis of ozone sites made

by the Lakes Area Director’s Consortium (LADCO) in 2010 show s that Ohio already has

more than enough ozone monitoring sites to co ver current requirements.

Th e LADCO analysis showed that PM10 sampling in Ohio has more than adequate coverage.

Reductions for PM10 could be made in Ohio although it is recognized that significant

reductions in costs won’t result from PM10 site and samp ler reductions.

Changes occur to the network each year that are unplanned. C hanges or temporary

interruptions of sampling may occur because of events such as building or roof maintenance,

construction, change of ownership of the site or other changes at t he site that require moving

the instruments. Some changes that are planned may include adding additional sites for

complaint areas or for some new or proposed facility. Other changes that are planned may

not actually happen because a new site cannot be s ecured or because of budget constraints.

## New Federal requirements for monitoring for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and carbon

monoxide air pollutants were set in 2009. These requirements will not take effect in 2012

but will take effect January 1, 201 3. Those requirements include near

- roadside monitors for

NO2 at 6 sites in Ohio plus 2 additional ozone sites and several sites for SO2 in specific

counties named by US EPA. Again those are plans that will need to be determined in 2012

for set

- up in 2013.

Three new National Core Monitoring Network ( NCORE ) sites have started operating in Ohio

in recent years in Cincinnati, Cleveland and Dayton agency jurisdictions. These NCORE

sites monitor for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide at trace c oncentration

levels were required to start January 1, 2011 but all started earlier than that date

. Th ose sites

will add lead samplers t o their sites to begin January 1, 2012

.

All site and parameter changes are made in consultation with and approval of t he US EPA

Region 5 air monitoring staff.

Guidance and Priorities

Ohio EPA follows the f

ederal general guidance for air monitoring according to 40 CFR 58

Appendix D to monitor in areas of 1) expected high concentrations, 2) areas of high

population density , 3) areas with significant sources

, 4) general background concentration

sites and 5) areas of regi onal transport of a pollutant. Not all air pollutants have sites for all

of these categories.

In addition to the above guidance in 2010 the A ir D irector s in the Region 5 states of Ohio,

Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota listed air monitoring objectives as :

1) Areas of high concentration and high population, provide timely air quality data to

the public, support compliance with NAAQS and control strategy development and

support air pollution research studies

2) Multi

- pollutant monitoring such as the NCore sites

3) Source

- oriented monitoring such as required monitoring for lead, nitrogen dioxide

and sulfur dioxide

4) Rur al monitoring and medium size city monitoring

5) Environmental justice monitoring

6) School air toxics monitoring

An important consideration of all air monitoring projects and sites is that funding resources

be available to operate and maintain the sites and equipment, to provide sample analys e s and

for data collection and reporting. An important funding change coming for very fine

particulates or PM2.5 is that the funding is changing from a Section 103 grant that is fully

federally funded to a part ial Section 105 grant that requires a state or local agency matching

amount. This change may limit the types and numbers of PM2.5 sampling that the state or

local is able to support

. Current plans are for funding in 2012 at 75% Section 103 funding

and 25% for Section 105 funding.

## A s of the time of publication of this list Ohio EPA plans to discontinue monitoring or has

already discontinued monitoring at locations as shown in the table at:

3 very fine particulate matter or PM2.5 sites

, Akron (2), HCDES

1 ozone site

, Akron

1 CO site, Akron

1 SO2 site, Akron

1 NO2 site, Akron

1 carbonyl toxics site, CDO

6 PM10 industrial sites, NWDO

Ohio EPA has moved or started sit es and instruments for:

4 PM2.5 sites

, 1 Portsmouth

, 1 Lake, 1 MTAPCA , 1 Toledo

3 PM2.5 FRM sites, Akron, MTAPCA, Lake

3 PM2.5 continuous sites, Cleveland, MTAPCA, Lake

2 PM10 site s

, Cleveland , Portsmouth

4 sulfur dioxide site s

, Portsmouth , SEDO 3, Portsmouth

2 ozone site s

, Akron, Portsmouth

2 TSP for metals site s, Cleveland, MTAPCA

3 NCore sites, Cleveland, HDCOES, RAPCA

For new requirements from July , 2009 for sulfur dioxide monitoring sites to be in place by

January 1, 2013 Ohio EPA has tentative plans to either continue SO2 monitor monitoring

sites or add / restart new SO2 monitoring sites as follows:

2 sites in Cincinnati to continue

2 sites in Cleveland to continue

1 site operated by West Virginia to continue, 1 SO2 monitor in

Marietta/SEDO may be added

1 site to continue in Steubenville

1 site to be added or restarted in Columbus

1 site to be added or restarted in Toledo

1 site to be added or moved near Point Pleasant/SEDO

1 site to be added or restarted in Dayton

1 site to continue in Akron

Depending upon new monitoring requirements for ozone sites to be in place possibly in

2013, Ohio EPA has tentative plans to add ozone monitoring sites as follows:

1 site in Mansfield/NWDO

1 site in Sandusky/NWDO

These plans are dependent upon securing adequate levels of funding to support the changes

to the air monitoring network. All of the plans are subject to approval by US EPA.

## For questions about the Ohio Air Monitoring Network plea se contact:

Gary Engler at 614

- 644

- 3623

.

Comments about the Ohio Air Monitoring Network may be emailed to:

gary.engler@epa.state.oh.us

Fax number 614

- 644

- 3681

Address:

Ohio EPA

Air Monitoring Section

Division of Air Pollution Control

P.O. Box 1049, 50 West Town St.

Columbus, OH 43215

### Ohio Air Monitoring Network

– 200 1 1

- 20 1 2

6/ 1 7 /2011

AQS ID #

Air Agency County

Address Latitude Long itude 

### Sampling

Method Analysis Schedule Monitoring

Objective Spatial

Sc ale Comments

Akron Medina Co.

39

- 103

- 0003 Deerview Ln Layfayete T wp 41.102778

- 81.911667 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Urban Ended 12/31/2010

PM2.5 TEOM FDMS Oscillating crystal Continuous Population Urban “

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Regional Ended 10/31/2010

39

- 103

- 0004 Ballash Rd. 41.0604

- 81.9239 Carbon monoxide Inf r ared Continuous Ended 7/31/2010

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Florencence Continuous “

Nitrogen dioxide Chemiluminescence Continuous “

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban Restart Apr. 1, 2011

PM2.5

- FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Urban Start 1/1/2011

PM2.5 BAM Beta attenuation Continu ous Population Urban Instrument repair

Portage. Co.

39

- 133

- 0002 531 Washington Ave. Ravenna 41.164167

- 81.235000 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

39

- 133

- 1001 1570 Ravenna Rd.,Kent 41.182500

- 81.330278 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Highest conc. Urban

Summit Co.

39

- 153

- 0014 177 S. Broadway St. 41.0792

- 81.5167 Wind speed/wind dir.

39

- 153

- 0017 East High S ch ., Akron 41.06 5278

- 81.468611 PM2.5 Seq FRMCol o Gravimetric 1 in 1 day Population Neighborhood Everyday sampler

PM2.5 BAM Beta attenuation Continuous Population Neighborhood Changed to BAM

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Highest conc. Neighborhood

39

- 153

- 0020 800 P atterson Ave, Akron 41.106111

- 81.503889 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban

Carbon monoxide Inf r ared Continuous Population Neighborhood

39

- 153

- 0022 177 Broadway, Akron 41.080278

- 81.516389 Carbon monoxide Inf r ared Continu ous Highest conc. Microscale

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Neighborhood

39

- 153

- 0023 660 W. Exchange St. Akron 41.088056

- 81.541667 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

Chemical sp eciation Ion Chromatograph 1 in 6 day SIP information

URG carbon spec?Canton Stark Co.

39

- 151

- 0016 515 25 th St., Malone College 40.827778

- 81.378611 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Neighb orhood

Wind speed/wind dir. Propeller/vane

39

- 151

- 0017 1330 Dueber Ave.,Fire Station 40.786667

- 81.394444 PM2.5 BGI FRMCol Gravimetric 1 in 1 day Highest conc. Neighborhood Everyday sampler

Chemical speciation Ion Chromatograph 1 in 6 day SIP information

URG carbon spec ?

TSP

– lead ICP 1 in 6 day Source

- oriented

39

- 151

- 0020 420 Market Ave., Canton 40.800556

- 81.373333 PM2.5 BGI FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

Carbon monoxid e Inf r ared Continuous Population Middle

PM2.5 TEOM Oscillating crystal Continuous Population Neighborhood

39

- 151

- 002 2 45 S. Wabash Ave., S.R. 93 40.708685

- 81.601256 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Background Urban Start 4/1 /2010

From Wilderness site

39

- 151

- 4005 1175 W. Vine St. Alliance 40.930833

- 81.123611 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Highest conc. Urban

Toledo Lucas Co.

39

- 095

- 0024 348 Erie St., Toledo 41.644167

- 83.546667 PM2.5 TEOM Oscillating crystal Continuous Highest conc. Neighborhood

PM2.5 SeqFRMColo Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Highest conc. Neighborhood

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Neighborhood

Wind speed/wind dir. Propeller/v ane

39

- 095

- 0025 600 Collins Park, Toledo 41.661944

- 83.479444 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood Site moved

39

- 095

- 002 8 600 Collins Park, Toledo 41.662283

- 83.468005 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 d ay Population Neighborhood New site/no. for 0025

39

- 095

- 0026 2550 Airport Highway 41.620556

- 83.641389 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Highest conc. Neighborhood

Chemical speciation Ion Chromatograph 1 in 6 day

URG carbon sp ec?

39

- 095

- 0027 200 S. River Road, Waterville 41.494722

- 83.718611 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Neighborhood

39

- 095

- 0034 306 N. Yondota, Low Service 41.675556

- 83.306944 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Highes t conc. Urban

39

- 095

- 0081 2930 131 st St., Toledo 41.719444

- 83.475000 Wind speed/wind dir. Propeller/vane

39

- 095

- 1003 Lee & Front St., Toledo 41.719444

- 83.475000 PM10 TEOM Oscillating crystal Continuous Population Neighborhoo dHamco DES Butler Co.

39

- 017

- 0003 Verity HS, Middletown 39.493611

- 84.353889 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 SC FRMColo Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood Discontinued 12/31/10

VOCs GC MS 1 in 12 day

39

- 017

- 0004 Schuler & Bender Ave, Hamltn 

### 39.383333

- 84.54416 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban

39

- 017

- 0015 3 9 01 Lefferson, Middletown 39.489167

- 84.357778 PM10

- Colo Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Popula tion Neighborhood

TSP lead

- metals ICP 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood

39

- 017

- 0016 400 Nilles Rd., Fairfield 39.338333

- 84.566389 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Urban

39

- 017

- 0018 Hook Field Airport, Middl etwn 39.52944

- 84.39345 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban Relocated frm 017

- 1004

39

- 017

- 0019 Amanda School 39.47885 84.40767 PM10 Gravimetric Population Neighborhood Started 6/1/11

PM2.5 FRM Gravimetric Population Neigh borhood Started 6/1/11

PM2.5

– BAM Beta attenuation Continuous Population Neighborhood Starting 6/30/11

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Florescence Continuous Population Neighborhood Starting 6/30/11

VOC Starting 6/30/11

39

- 017

- 0020 Ya nkee Road 39.47240 84.39498 PM10 Gravimetric Population Neighborhood Started 6/1/11

PM2.5 FRM Gravimetric Population Neighborhood Started 6/1/11

PM2.5

– BAM? Beta attenuation Continuous Population Neighborhood Starting 6/30/11

Sulfur dioxi de Pulsed Florescence Continuous Population Neighborhood Starting 6/30/11

VOC Starting 6/30/11

39

- 017

- 1004 Hook Field Airport 39.530000

- 84.392500 PM2.5 BAM Beta attenuation Continuous Highest conc. Urban Discontinued Mar.2010

Ch emical speciation Ion Chromatograph 1 in 6 day SIP information Discontinued Mar.2010

Chemical speciation Frequent SIP information URG

- 3000 carbon Disc.

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Neighborhood Discontinued March

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban Moved to 017

- 0018

Wind speed/wind dir. Sonic Discontinued Mar.2010

Clermont Co.

39

- 025

- 0022 2400 Clermont Drive, Batavia 39.083056

- 84.144167 PM2.5 Seq.FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Po pulation Neighborhood Discontinue FRM

PM2.5 TEOM FDMS Oscillating crystal Continuous Population Neighborhood

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Highest conc. Urban

Wind speed/wind dir. Sonic

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Conti nuous Source oriented Possible new SO2 mon

Hamilton Co.

39

- 061

- 0001 Public Library, Vine St. 39.1047

- 84.5136 TSP metals ICP 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood Discontinued 12/31/1039

- 061

- 0006 11590 Grooms Rd. ,Sycamore 39.279444

- 84.366389 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 BAMS Beta Attenuation Continuous Population Neighborhood Restarted 3/1/11

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Highest conc. Urban

Nitrogen dioxide Chemiluminescenc e Continuous AQI forecast Possible new monitor

39

- 061

- 0010 6950 Ripple Rd. Colerain 39.216389

- 84.699722 Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Neighborhood NC ore moved to 0040

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Populatio n Urban

Carbon monoxide Inf r ared Continuous Population Middle NC ore moved to 0040

NOy Chemiluminescence Continuous NC ore moved to 0040

PM2.5 Continuous

PM2.5 FRM

39

- 061

- 0014 Carthage Fire, Seymour/Vine 39.194167

- 84.478889 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Highest conc. Middle

PM2.5 SeqFRM Colo Gravimetric 1 in 1 day Population Neighborhood Everyday sampler

VOCs GC MS 1 in 12 day

Wind speed/wind dir.

39

- 061

- 0021 Federal Bldg.,100 E.5 th St.Cinti 39.101944

- 84.509722 Carbon monoxide Inf r ared Continuous Highest conc. Microscale To discontinue, low conc

39

- 061

- 0040 250 Taft Rd. Cincinnati 39.128611

- 84.504167 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood Discontinued 12 /31/10

PM10 TEOM Oscillating crystal Continuous Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 S C FRM

- colo Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 TEOM /FDMS Oscillating crystal Continuous Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 speciation Ion Chro matograph 1 in 6 day SIP info

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Neighborhood

NO2 Chemiluminescence Continuous Population Neighborhood

Wind speed/wind dir Sonic

Haze camera

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Neighborhood NC ore moved frm 0010

Carbon monoxide Inf r ared Continuous Population Middle NC ore moved frm 0010

NOy Chemiluminescence Continuous NC ore moved frm 0010

39

- 061

- 0042 Lower Price Hill, 8 t h St. Cinti 39.105000

- 84.551111 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

39

- 061

- 5001 Wyoming & Cooper, Lockland 39.226389

- 84.453889 PM10

– Colo Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood

39

- 061

- 7001 2059 Sherman Ave. Norwood 39.160000

- 84.457778 PM2.5 SC FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood Discontinued 12/31/10

39

- 061

- 8001 300 Murray Rd. 39.180278

- 84.491944 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Highest conc. Neighbo rhood Discontinued 2/7/201039

- 061

- 8001 PM2.5 speciation Ion Chromatograph 1 in 6 day SIP info

Warren Co.

39

- 165

- 0007 416 Southeast St. , Lebanon 39.427900

- 84.202200 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood Discontinu e FRM

PM2.5 TEOM Oscillating crystal Continuous Population Neighborhood

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Max ozone Urban

Wind speed/wind dir.

Cleveland Cuyahoga Co.

39

- 035

- 0034 891 E. 152 St. 41.555000

- 81.575000 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Highest conc. Urban

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Neighborhood

39

- 035

- 0038 St. Theodosius, St. Tikon St. 41.476944

- 81.681944 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Highest conc. Neighborhood

PM2.5 SeqFRMColo Gravimetric 1 in 1 day Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 TEOMFDMS Oscillating crystal Continuous Population Neighborhood Restarted 10/15/2010

TSP lead

- metals ICP 1 in 6 day Highest conc. Neighborhood

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Highest conc. Neighborhood

PM2.5 speciation Ion Chromatograph 1 in 6 day SIP info

Carbon spec iation URG

- 3000

Wind speed/dir

39

- 035

- 0042 Fire Station 4, 3136 Lorain 41.482222

- 81.708889 TSP

- met als Colo ICP 1 in 6 day Highest conc Middle

39

- 035

- 0045 FS 13, 4950 Broadway Ave. 41.471667

- 81.657222 PM10 Colo Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 Seq.FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

Sulfur dio xide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Neighborhood

39

- 035

- 0049 Ferro Corp. E. 56 th St. 41.446667

- 81.651111 TSP

- lead metals Colo ICP 1 in 6 day Highest conc. Neighborhood

39

- 035

- 0051 Galler ia, E. Ninth & St. Clair 41.504444

- 81.690278 Carbon monoxide Inf r ared Continuous Highest conc. Microscale

39

- 035

- 0053 4160 Pearl Rd. ,Broadview 41.441667

- 81.703889 Carbon monoxide Inf r ared Continuous Highest conc. Microscale

39

- 035

- 0060 GT Craig, E. 14 th & Orange 41.491944

- 81.678333 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood Restart 9/1/10

PM10 TEOM Oscillating crystal Continuous Neighborhood

PM2.5 Seq.FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 TEOM FDMS Oscillating crystal Continuous Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 spec

. Colo Ion Chromatograph 1 in 3 day SIP info

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Neighborhood Start 7/28/09 by US EPA39

- 035

- 0060 VOCs GC MS 1 in 1 2 day

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous NC ore start 1/1/11

NO y Chemiluminescence Continuous “

Carbon monoxide Carbon monoxide Inf r ared “

PM10

- 2.5 Coarse Gravimetric 1 in 3 day “

Wind speed/wind dir. Sonic

39

- 035

- 0061 South side W. 3 rd St. 41.472222

- 81.675278 TSP

- lead

- metals ICP 1 in 6 day Source

- oriented Middle

39

- 035

- 0064 390 Fair St. Berea BOE 41.361667

- 81.864722 Ozone U.V. Photome tric Continuous Highest conc. Neighborhood

39

- 035

- 0065 4600 Harvard Ave Newburgh 41.446389

- 81.661944 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Highest conc. Neighborhood

PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

Sulfur dioxi de Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Highest conc. Neighborhood

39

- 035

- 0068 7629 Broadway 41.454791

- 81.634757 VOCs GC MS 1 in 12 day

39

- 035

- 0069 Fire S. 22, 7300 Superior 41.519181

- 81.637939 VOCs GC MS 1 in 12 day

39

- 035

- 0072 26565 Miles Rd.,Warrensville 41.42585

- 81.49078 TSP

- Lead ICP 1 in 6 day Source oriented Neighborhood New lead site

39

- 035

- 1002 16900 Holland Road 41.395556

- 81.818056 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood

PM2. 5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

39

- 035

- 5002 6116 Wilson Road, Mayfield 41.536667

- 81.459167 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban

RAPCA Clark Co.

39

- 023

- 0001 5171 Urbana Rd., Spring field 40.000833

- 83.804444 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Highest conc. Urban

39

- 023

- 0003 5400 Spangler Rd., Enon 39.855556

- 83.997500 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Highest conc. Neighborhood

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Con tinuous Population Neighborhood

39

- 023

- 0005 350 N. Fountain Rd,Springfield 39.928889

- 83.809722 PM2.5 Sharp Beta attenuation Continuous Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 BGI FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

Greene Co.

39

- 057

- 0005 100 Dayton Rd. YellowSprings 39.808056

- 83.886944 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 BGI FRM Gravimetric 1in 3 day Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 Sharp Beta attenuation Continuous Population Neighborhoo d

39

- 057

- 0006 541 Ledbetter Rd., Xenia 39.665556

- 81.249444 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Highest conc UrbanMiami Co.

39

- 109

- 0005 3825 N. Rt. 589, Castown 40.084722

- 84.114722 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Highe st conc Urban

Montgomery Co

39

- 113

- 0028 901 W. Fairview, Dayton 39.787222

- 84.226111 Carbon monoxide Inf r ared Continuous Population Neighborhood

39

- 113

- 0032 215 E. 3 rd St., Dayton Library 39.760278

- 84.187778 PM2.5 FRM

- Colo Gravim etric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 Sharp Beta attenuation Continuous Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 speciation Ion Chromatograph 1 in 6 day SIP information

Chem speciation Carbon speciation Not operating

VOCs GC MS 1 in 12 day

39

- 113

- 0034 117 S. Main St., Dayton 39.757778

- 84.191667 Carbon monoxide Inf r ared Continuous Highest conc Microscale

39

- 113

- 0037 1401 Harshman Rd., Dayton 39.7850

- 84.1345 Ozone U.V. Photometric Con tinuous Population Urban

39

- 113

- 7001 2728 Viking Lane, Moraine 39.714167

- 84.218056 PM10

– Colo Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Highest conc Neighborhood

Preble Co.

39

- 135

- 1001 St. Rt. 40, New Paris 39.835556

- 84.720833 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravim etric 1 in 3 day Population Regional

PM2.5 Sharp Beta attenuation Continuous Regional trasprt Urban

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Regional

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous NCore start 1/1/2011

C arbon monoxide Infr ared Continuous “

NOy Chemiluminescence Continuous “

PM10

- 2.5 Coarse Gravimetric “

PM10

– LC Gravimetric

MTAPCA Mahoning Co.

39

- 099

- 0005 Elm & Madison,F ire Station #7 41.111111

- 80.645278 PM10

- colo Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 SeqFRM Colo Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood

39

- 099

- 0006 Superior & Oakland, Fire St. 5 41.116667

- 80.669722 PM10

- colo Gravi metric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood

39

- 099

- 0013 345 Oakhill Ave. Youngstown 41.096111

- 80.658611 Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Neighborhood

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Neighbor hood

39

- 099

- 0014 345 Oakhill Ave. Youngstown 41.095868

- 80.658426 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 TEOM Oscillating crystal Continuous Population Neighborhood

39

- 099

- 0014 Chem Speciation Ion Chroma tograph 1 in 6 day SIP info

Trumbull Co.

39

- 155

- 0005 540 Laird Ave., Warren 41.230833

- 80.801944 PM10

- Colo Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Source

- oriented Middle39

- 155

- 0005 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood From 155

- 0 007

PM2.5 TEOM Oscillating crystal Continuous Population Neighborhood From 155

- 0007

39

- 155

- 0006 Warren Water Treatment Plant 41.201944

- 80.810550 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood From 155

- 0007

39

- 155

- 0009 Kin sman Township Bldg, SR87 41.453889

- 80.591667 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Highest conc. Urban

39

- 155

- 0011 St. Rt. 193, Vienna , TCSEG 41.240077

- 80.663142 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Reg. transport Urban

39

- 155

- 0012 26 00Elmwood Dr.,Hubbard 41.17279

- 80.422500 TSP

- Lead ICP 1 in 6 day Source oriented Urban New required lead site

Lake Co. Geauga Co.

39

- 055

- 0004 Notre Dame School, Munson 41.515000

- 81.249444 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban

Lake Co.

39

- 085

- 0003 Jefferson School, Eastlake 41.673056

- 81.422500 Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Neighborhood

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Highest conc. Neighborhood

39

- 085

- 0006 8443 Mentor Ave. , Mentor 41.666667

- 81.339167 Carbon monoxide Inf r ared Continuous Highest conc. Microscale

39

- 085

- 0007 177 Main St., Painesville 41.726811

- 81.242156 PM2.5SeqFRMColo Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Highest conc. Urban Replaced Site 085

- 3002

PM2.5 TEOM FDMS Oscillating crystal Continuous Highest conc. Urban Restarted 10/27/10

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Source

- oriented Middle

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Highest conc. Urban

39

- 085

- 1001 Fairport High Sc hool, Fairport 41.755000

- 81.273056 PM10

- Colo Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Highest conc. Neighborhood Complaint area

Portsmouth Adams Co.

39

- 001

- 0001 Adams Cnty Hosptal, W.Union 38.795000

- 83.535278 PM2.5 TA

- BAM Beta attenuation Continuous Population Neighborhood Restarted 2/1/2011

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Neighborhood

Lawrence Co.

39

- 087

- 0006 Ironton Health Dept., Eighth St 38.520278

- 82.666667 Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Po pulation Neighborhood Moved to 087

- 0012

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Neighborhood Moved to 087

- 0012

39

- 087

- 0011 St. Rt. 141, Wilgus 38.629167

- 82.457500 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Highest conc. Urban

39

- 087

- 0012 ODOT Garage, Commerce Dr. 38.5081 14

- 82.6593 01 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood Replaced site 087

- 0010

PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 TA

- BAM Beta attenuation Continuous Population Neighborhood

Chem Spec Ion Chromatograph 1 in 6 day

Carbon speciation URG

- 3000

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Neighborhood From site 087

- 000639

- 087

- 0012 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Neig hborhood From site 087

- 0006

Scioto Co.

39

- 145

- 0013 Portsmouth Water Treat. Ports. 38.754167

- 82.917500 PM10

- Colo Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Highest conc. Middle

PM2.5 SeqFRMColo Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Highest conc. Neighborhood

Sulfur di oxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Highest conc. Middle

39

- 145

- 0019 Portsmouth City Annex, Ports 38.735000

- 82.998889 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood

39

- 145

- 0020 2840 Back Rd.FranklinFurnace 38.609048

- 82.82 2911 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood Required by permit

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Neighborhood Required by permit

VOCs GC

- MS 1 in 12 day Required by permit

39

- 145

- 0021 2446GalliaPik e,FranklnFurnac 38.600611

- 82.829762 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Background Neighborhood Required by permit

VOCs GC

- MS 1 in 12 day Required by permit

39

- 145

- 0022 1740GalliaPike,FranklnFurnac 38.588034

- 82.834973 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Background Neighborhood Required by permit

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Background Neighborhood Required by permit

VOCs GC

- MS 1 in 12 day Required by permit

CDO Delaware Co.

39

- 041

- 0002 359 Main Rd., Delaware 40.356 944

- 83.063 889 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban

Franklin Co.

39

- 049

- 0005 1585 Morse Rd., Columbus 40.060000

- 82.976944 Carbon Monoxide Inf r ared Continuous Highest conc. Middle

39

- 049

- 0024 State Fair grounds, Columbus 39.998333

- 82.993056 PM10

- Colo Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Highest conc. Neighborhood

PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

39

- 049

- 0025 580 E.Woodrow Av. Columbus 39.928056

- 82.981111 PM2.5 FRM

- Colo Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Highest conc. Neighborhood

TSP

- lead

- metals ICP Neighborhood

39

- 049

- 0029 New Albany HS, New Albany 40.086667

- 82.815556 PM2.5 BAM Oscillating crystal Continuous Population Neighborhood BAM replaced TEOM

Ozon e U.V. Photometric Continuous Highest conc. Neighborhood

39

- 049

- 0034 State Fairgrounds, Korbel Ave. 40.002500

- 82.994444 PM2.5 TEOM Oscillating crystal Continuous Population Neighborhood Replaced TEOM 1/24/10

VOCs GC MS 1 in 12 day

Carbonyl sampler 1 in 6 day Discontinued

39

- 049

- 0037 Franklin Park, Broad St. 39.965278

- 82.958056 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Middle

39

- 049

- 0081 Fire Station, Maple Canyon 40.087778

- 82.959722 Ozone U.V. Pho tometric Continuous Highest conc. Urban

PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Highest conc. Neighborhood39

- 049

- 0081 Chemical speciation Ion Chromatograph 1 in 6 day SIP information

Chemical speciation Carbon speciation URG

- 3000

Kn ox Co.

39

- 083

- 0002 Fire Station , Centerburg 40.309722

- 82.691944 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban

Licking Co.

39

- 089

- 0005 Heath School, Heath 40.025833

- 82.432778 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban

Madison Co.

39

- 097

- 0007 Madison School, London 39.788611

- 83.475833 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban

NEDO Ashtabula Co.

39

- 007

- 1001 Conneaut Water Plt., Conneaut 41.959444

- 80.572500 Sulfur dioxide Pulsed F luorescence Continuous Population Urban

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban

Columbiana Co.

39

- 029

- 0019 Columbiana PortAuthority,E.L. 40.631111

- 80.546944 TSP

- lead

- metals ICP 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood

3 9

- 029

- 0020 Water Treat. Plant, E.Liverpool 40.639722

- 80.523889 TSP

- lead

- metals ICP 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood

PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Microscale

Wind speed/direction Sonic

39

- 029

- 0022 500 Maryland Ave,E.L iverpool 40.635000

- 80.546667 TSP

- lead metals

- Colo ICP 1 in 6 day Population Microscale School Air Toxics site

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Microscale

PM10 Colocated Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Microscale

Lora in Co.

39

- 093

- 0018 Fire Station, Sheffield 41.420882

- 82.095729 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Neighborhood

39

- 093

- 3002 Barr School, Sheffield 41. 463056

- 81. 114444 PM10 Colocated Gravimetric 1 in 6 day

PM2.5Seq. FRMColo Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Source

- oriented Neighborhood

PM2.5 TEOMFDMS Oscillating crystal Continuous Source

- oriented Neighborhood

Chemical speciation Ion Chromatograph

Chemical speciation Carbon speciation URG

- 3000

NWDO Allen Co.

39

- 003

- 0002 Bath High. School, Lima 40.772222

- 84.051944 Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Urban

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban

PM2.5 FRM Gravimetric 1 in 6 da y Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 TEOM FDMS Oscillating crystal Continuous AQI Neighborhood

39

- 003

- 0006 Nat.Lime/Stone,FindlyRdLima 40.752500

- 84.085556 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood Discontinued 3/31/11

3 9

- 003

- 0007 Nat.Lime/Stone,RouchRd Lima 40.752500

- 84.070000 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood “39

- 003

- 0008 Nat.Lime/Stone, NorthStLima 40.744167

- 84.093889 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood Discontinued 3/31/11

Fulton Co.

39

- 051

- 0001 Van Buren St., Delta 41.575278

- 83.996389 TSP

- lead metals C olo ICP 1 in 6 day Highest conc. Microscale “

Hancock Co.

39

- 063

- 0002 Nat.Lime/Stone,CR313Findlay 41.010 556

- 83.688056 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood “

39

- 063

- 0003 Nat.Lime/Stone,CR313Findlay 41.012778

- 83.696944 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood “

39

- 063

- 000 4 Nat.Li me/Stone,CR144Findlay 41.023611

- 83.685556 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood “

Marion Co.

39

- 101

- 0003 Nucor Steel, Hawthorne Ave. 42.57141

- 83.13556 TSP

- lead ICP 1 in 6 day Source

- oriented Neighborhood New requir ed site

Ottawa Co.

39

- 123

- 0014 Brush Wellman, Elmore TSP

– beryllium ICP 7daysample

Sandusky Co.

36

- 143

- 0019 Clyde 41.30556

- 82.97961 TSP

- lead/metals ICP 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood Special cancer study

Wood Co.

39

- 173

- 0003 NWDO Office,Bowling Green 41.378056

- 83.611667 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Other Urban

SEDO Athens Co.

39

- 009

- 0003 St. Rt. 377, Gifford Forest 39.442500

- 81.908611 PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Background R egional Background 2.5 site

Belmont Co.

39

- 013

- 3002 E. 40 th St. Shadyside Treatment 39.968056

- 80.747500 Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Neighborhood

Jefferson Co.

39

- 081

- 0001 1004 3 rd St., Brilliant 40.26138 9

- 80.633611 PM10 Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Population Neighborhood

39

- 081

- 0017 618 Logan St. , Steubenville 40.366104

- 80.615002 Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Neighborhood

PM10

- colo Gravimetric 1 in 6 day Populat ion Neighborhood

PM2.5 Seq. FRM Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

PM2.5 TEOM FDMS Oscillating crystal Continuous AQI Neighborhood BAM to replace TEOM

Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Neighborhood

VOCs GC MS 1 in 12 day

39

- 081

- 1001 City Hall, Mingo Junction 40.321944

- 80.606389 PM2.5 Seq. FRM colo Gravimetric 1 in 3 day Population Neighborhood

Carbon speciation SIP info URG

- 3000

Chem Speciation Ion Chromatograph 1 in 6 day SIP info

VOCs GC MS 1 in 12 day

39

- 081

- 0018 3487 Cnty Rd. 19, Brilliant Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Started 1/1/11

39

- 081

- 0019 Landfill Access Rd., Brilliant WS,WD Continuous Started 1/1/11

Sulfur dio xide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous39

- 081

- 0020 1469 Third St., Brilliant WS,WD Continuous Started 1/1/11

Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Started 1/1/11

Meigs Co.

39

- 105

- 1 00 1 Veterans Hospital, Pomeroy 3 9.037778

- 82.045556 Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Urban Gavin power plant

Morgan Co.

39

- 115

- 0004 St. Rt. 83, Hackney 39.634221

- 81.670038 Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Source

- oriented Urban Musk.River power plant

Tuscarawas Co.

39

- 157

- 0006 527 Crescent Drive, Sugarcreek 40.511416

- 81.639149 Sulfur dioxide Pulsed Fluorescence Continuous Population Neighborhood

Washington Co.

39

- 167

- 0004 2000 4 th St. Marietta Water 39.4 31667

- 81.460278 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Neighborhood

39

- 167

- 0008 R 676WashingtonCareerCenter 39.433611

- 81.502500 TSP

- lead metals ICP I in 6 day Population Urban

39

- 167

- 0009 Blue Knob, Washington Co. 39.37680 0

- 81.537300 TSP

- lead

- metals Gravimetric I in 6 day Population Neighborhood

39

- 167

- 0010 Ohio Valley Educa.. Center 39.413694

- 81.475089 TSP

- leadmetals

- colo ICP I in 6 day Population Neighborhood

SWDO Clinton Co.

39

- 027

- 1 002 Laurel OaksSchool,Wilmington 39.430000

- 83.788611 Ozone U.V. Photometric Continuous Population Urban

Logan Co.

39

- 091

- 0006 Richard Ave., Bellefontaine 40.341111

- 83.757778 TSP

- lead

- metals ICP 1 in 6 day Highest conc. Neighborhood Sampling c ontinue d



### Notes /Explanations :

AQS is the Air Quality System maintained by US EPA for air quality data. In the AQS ID# t he first 2 digits refer to the state. 39 is Ohio. The next 3

digits are the county wit hin Ohio. The last 4 digits designate a specific site within the county.

All PM2.5 Seq. FRM sites , BGI FRM sites and BAMS sites are comparable to the PM2.5 NAAQS.

All Ozone site s are comparable to the NAAQS

.

All s ulfur dioxide

, carbon monoxide and nit rogen dioxide sites are comparable to the NAAQS

.

PM is Particulate Matter. PM10 means particulate matter of 10 microns in diameter or smaller. A micron is one millionth of a meter.

### PM2.5 is particulate matter 2.5 millionths of a meter in diameter or s maller. PM10 is fine particulate matter and PM2.5 is very fine particulate matter.

Monitoring instruments used for comparing to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards are designated as Federal Reference M ethods (FRM) or

Equivalent Methods.

PM2.5 Seq. FRM are samplers that sample for PM2.5 can hold multiple samples for Sequential sampling and are F ederal R eference M ethods (FRM)

.

Colocated or colo indicates a site with duplicate samplers for Quality Assurance purposes. Data is statistically compa red from the two samplers for the

same days

. Duplicate samplers may sample at a I in 6 day schedule or possibly at a 1 in 12 day schedule.

Chem. Speciation sites are sites and samplers that collect PM2.5 samples that are analyzed for the chemical speciat ion make

- up of the PM2.5 particulate

matter.

U.V. Photometric indicates ultra

- violet photometric, a method of detection for ozone concentrations

.

U.V. fluorescence indicates ultra

- violet fluorescence, a method of detection for sulfur dioxide concentrat ions.

VOCs are Volatile Organic Compounds . The method of collecting and analyzing whole air samples for VOCs is in Ohio is TO

- 1 5 . The collection

utilizes a stainless steel canister for subsequent analysis by gas chromatograph

- mass spectromet e r. There are approximately 72 compounds scanned for

in the analysis.

TSP

– metals is the method of collecting T otal S uspended P articulate by drawing an air sample through a filter media that is then analyzed at a laboratory

for airborne metals including lead, ars enic, cadmium, chromium, nickel, zinc, manganese and beryllium and sometimes particulate mercury . Analysis is

by ICP or Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectroscopy or Graphic Furnace Atomic Absorption

.

BAM indicates a Beta Attenuation Monitor, a me thod of detection for very fine particulates.

TEOM indicates a Tapered Element Oscillating M i cro balance, a method of detection for very fine particulates.

SIP is State Implementation Plan that details how the state will implement controls that will bring the area into attainment status for a particular National

Ambient Air Quality Standard. Chemical speciation sampling and analysis for PM2.5 aids helps to determine what control measures and plans will best

control fine particulates.

### Ohio Air Monitor ing Agencies

The following organizations perform ambient air quality sampling in Ohio within specific areas of the state:

Akron Regional Air Quality Management District

146 South High St.

Akron, Ohio 44308

(330) 375

- 2480

Medina, Portage, Summit counties City of Toledo

Division of Environmental Services

348 South Erie St.

Toledo, Ohio 43604

(419) 936

- 3015

Lucas County

Air Pollution Control Division

Canton City Health Department

420 Market Ave. North

Canton, Ohio 44702

- 1544

(330) 489

- 3385

Stark County M ahoning

- Trumbull APC Agency

345 Oak Hill Ave.

Youngstown, Ohio 44502

(330) 743

- 3333

Mahoning, Trumbull counties

Hamilton County Dept. of Environmental Services

250 William Howard Taft Road

Cincinnati, Ohio 44702

- 1544

(330)

- 489

- 3385

Hamilton, Butler, Warr en, Clermont counties Ohio EPA

Central District Office

50 West Town St.

Columbus, Ohio 43604

(614) 728

- 3778

Cleveland Department of Public Health & Welfare

Division of the Environment

1925 St. Clair Ave.

Cleveland, Ohio 44114

(216) 664

- 2324

Cuyahoga Count y Ohio EPA

Southeast District Office

2195 Front St.

Logan, Ohio 43138

(740) 385

- 8501

Regional Air Pollution Control Agency

Montgomery C ounty Health Department

117 S outh Main St.

P.O. Box 972

Dayton, Ohio 45422

- 1280

(937) 225

- 4435

Montgomery, Preble, Darke , Miami, Clark, Greene Ohio EPA

Northeast District Office

2110 Aurora Rd.

Twinsburg, Ohio 44087

(330) 425

- 9171

### Air Pollution Unit

Portsmouth City Health Department

605 Washington Street

Portsmouth, Ohio 45662

(740) 353

- 5156

Brown, Adams, Scioto, Lawrence Ohio EPA

Southwest District Office

401 East Fifth St.

Dayton, Ohio 45402

- 2911

(937) 285

- 6357

## Public Notice

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Ohio Lead Air Monitoring Network 2011-2012

Notice is hereby given that the Director of the Ohio Envi ronmental Protection Agency,

(Ohio EPA) as required by 40 CFR 58.10 is making the Lead Air Monitoring Network

2011-2012 plans for ambient air monitoring available for a 30-day public comment

period. The plans include the new sampling network for monitoring airborne lead based

upon the revised National Ambient Air Qualit y Standard for lead with added plans for

facilities with 0.5 ton per y ear of lead emissions. The new standard for lead of 0.15

micrograms per cubic meter of air as a ro lling 3-month average required a US EPA

approved lead monitoring network that began sampling Januar y 1, 2010. All plans for

the monitoring of lead, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone and

fine particulates are subject to approval by the United St ate Environmental Protection

Agency (U.S. EPA).

These air monitoring plans must be noticed to allow public comment and to satisfy U.S.

EPA requirements for public in volvement in air monitoring activities. This notice

addresses Ohio EPA’s reliance on air monito ring as evidence of attainment and

maintenance and the commitment to instit ute contingency measures if ambient

exceedances or violations trigger the contingency plan requirements. Written

comments will be received on or before June 11, 2011 at the following address:

E-mail: gary.engler@epa.state.oh.us

Mailing address: Gary Engler

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, DAPC

Lazarus Government Center

P.O. Box 1049

Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049

Phone: (614)- 644-3623

### 1 | Page 

## Ohio Lead Monitoring Plans 2011-2012

The US EPA issued a new National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for airborne

lead in 2008. The new lead st andard is set at 0.15 ug/m3 as a rolling 3-month average.

As a result of that action Ohio EPA, district offices, and contractual agencies

implemented a new lead monitori ng network of seven require d samplers on January 1,

2010. Those seven sites were at locations near facilities that were modeled by the Ohio

EPA Division of Air Polluti on Control State Implementat ion Plan (SIP) Section as

discussed in the following Revised Lead Monitoring Network 2011-2012 . Site

information about the initial seven samplers that began sampling in early 2011 is

included in this notice.

US EPA has determined an additional need for fa cilities with emissions over 0.5 ton per

year (tpy) to be modeled for possible impacts of airborne t he lead. The SIP Section has

modeled facilities with emissions exceeding 0.5 tpy of lead. The results of the modeling

at three facilities in Ohio are specifica lly discussed in the Revised Lead Monitoring

Network 2011-2012.

In addition to the identified fa cilities with lead emissions of over 0.5 tpy there are three

new National Core Monitoring (NCore) Stations in Ohio to sample for airborne lead.

The contractual agencies in Hamilton County (HC DES), Montgomery County (Regional

Air Pollution Control Agency) and Cuyahoga County (Clevel and Department of Public

Health, Division of Air Quality) are operat ing NCore sites. Lead sampling is one of the

requirements for NCore monitori ng sites and required to start on or before December

27, 2011.

Agencies with NCore sites that are located in areas not likely to show significant lead

concentrations are permitted to request to move the required sampler to a location more

likely to show measureable lead concentrations . The main RAPCA NCore site is located

in rural Preble Co. The RAPCA agency ha s already sought and was granted permission

to set up a lead site in Mora ine in Montgomery County.

Details of the locations of the NCore lead si tes follow the information about the facilities

in Ohio that have more than 0.5 tpy of lead emissions.

### 2 | Page 

## Revised Lead Monitoring Network 2011-2012

As part of implementation of the newly re vised 2008 National Ambient Air Quality

Standards for lead, the lead monitoring network was revised and expa nded beginning in

2010. Beginning in 2010, facilities with emissi ons of lead greater than one ton per year

(tpy) were required to be monitored and facilit ies with emissions of lead greater than 0.7

tpy were required to be modeled to determi ne if they impacted 50% of the new lead

standard. If these sources did impact 50% of the new lead standard they also required

a monitor. U.S. EPA did provid e a waiver option for a facility emitting over one tpy. If

the state performed mode ling to show the source would no t impact 50% of the new land

standard, a waiver could be submitted for t he monitoring requireme nt. The new lead

standard was set at 0.15 ug/m3.

On December 14, 2010 U.S.EPA finalized ru le changes to again expand the nation's

lead monitoring network to better assess compli ance with the 2008 lead standard. U.S.

EPA is now requiring all facilities with emi ssions of lead greater than 0.5 tpy to be

monitored. U.S. EPA also retained the option for the state to perform modeling and

submit a waiver for these s ources, if applicable. This se ction will discuss Ohio EPA’s

proposed revised lead monitoring network, as it relates to facility specific monitoring of

lead emissions.

As a part of this effort, Ohio EPA began an extensive review of lead emissions

inventories. Based on the inventories, Ohio EPA consulted with several facilities

regarding their reporting history. In some cases Ohio EPA found discrepancies where

facilities have reported erroneously. Because the facility based lead monitoring network

is based upon actual lead emissions from Oh io sources, it was essential to gather

accurate information regarding lead emissions in order to effectively develop the lead

monitoring network. Once Ohio EPA finalized the accurate emission inve ntories, any

source (not already monitored) with lead em issions greater than 0.5 tpy were selected

for modeling 1 

## to determine if their impact on ambient air would necessitate a monitor.

This section contains a discussion of the results of this modeling and the determination

as to whether a monitor would be necessary.

Ohio EPA found three facilitie s with lead emissions exceedi ng 0.5 tpy, not currently

being monitored. All information regarding the modeling performed by Ohio EPA can be

found in the attached waiver request (see page 6).

1 

### Unless otherwise noted, all modeling was based upon the highest emissions rates that correspond to the highest

ton per year emissions reported, in either the National Emissions Inventory or the Toxic Release Inventory, by the

facility between 2007 and 2009, as guided by USEPA.

### 3 | Page 

## National Core Monitoring Stations Lead Sampling

In addition to sampling for lead near facilitie s with lead emissions, there is a requirement

for airborne lead sampling at National Core Monitoring Stations (NCore). There are

three NCore sites in Ohio; The Hamilton C ounty Division of Environmental Services

operates one NCore site in Hamilton County, The Regional Air Pollution Control Agency

(RAPCA) in Dayton operates one site in Preble County , and the Cleveland Department

of Public Health, Division of Air Qualit y operates one site in Cuyahoga County.

Agencies with NCore sites that are located in rural areas of anticipated low lead

concentrations may request permission thr ough the Regional Director to move the

required monitor to a location more likely to detect lead concentrations. The RAPCA

NCore site is located in rural Preble Co . The RAPCA agency has already sought and

was granted permission to locate their requi red lead site in Mo raine in Montgomery

County.

Details of the locations of the NCore lead si tes follow the information about the facilities

in Ohio that have more than 0.5 tpy of l ead emissions. The lead sampling at NCore

sites are required to start on or before Dece mber 27, 2011. If possible those sites will

begin in November in order to obtain a co mplete 2012 sampling year with a 3-month

rolling average beginning in January 2012.

All of Ohio Current a nd New Ohio Lead Monito ring Sites for 2011-2012

Historical Lead Sites that Ohio will continue to operate

Middletown 39-017-0015 Bu tler 39.489900 -84.364067

Columbiana Port 39-029-0019 Columbiana 40.631111 -80.546944

Michigan Ave. 39-029-0020 Co lumbiana 40.639722 -80.523889

Maryland 39-029-0022 Colu mbiana 40.635000 -80.546667

St. Tikhon 39-035-0038 Cu yahoga 41.476944 -81.681944

Fire Sta. 4 39-035-0042 Cuyahoga 41. 482222 -81.708889

MM South 39-035-0061 Cuy ahoga 41.472222 -81.675278

### 4 | Page 

## Woodrow 39-049-0025 Fr anklin 39.928056 -82.981111

Marietta 39-167-0008 Wash ington 39.433611 -81.502500

Marietta 39-167-0010 Wash ington 39.413694 -81.470589

These sites are for sources that currently hav e monitors in place and will continue to

monitor the source.

Source AQS Number County Latitude Longitude

Name

Ferro 39-035-0049 Cuy ahoga 41.446667 -81.651111

Bunting Bearing 39-051-0001 Fulton 41. 575278 -83.996389

Daido 39-091-0006 Logan 40.341111 -83.757778

These new sites began sampling in 2010 in addition to those above at locations that are

based on emissions and modeling.

Source AQS Number County Latitude Longitude

Name

Am Spring Wire 39-035-0072 Cuyahoga 41. 426897 -81.490767

Nucor Steel 39-101-0003 Marion 40.571892 -83.137341

Timken 39-151-0017 St ark 40.785406 -81.397506

Ellwood 39-155-0012 Trum bull 41.186422 -80.557893

These are the new NCore lead sites t hat will begin sampling later in 2011.

### 5 | Page 

## Name AQS Number County Latitude Longitude

G.T. Craig 39-035-0060 Cuyahoga 41.492117 -81.678449

Moraine FH 39-113-7001 Montgomery 39.714167 -84.218056

Taft 39-061-0040 Ham ilton 39.128611 -84.504167

### 6 | Page 

## Ms. Cheryl Newton

Air and Radiation Division

U.S. EPA Region 5

77 West Jackson Blvd A-18J

Chicago, IL 60604-3590

Re: Request for Lead Monitoring Wa ivers near Ohio Industrial Sources

On November 12, 2008, U.S. EPA substantially strengt hened the National Ambient Air

Quality Standards (NAAQS) for lead by revising the leve l of the primary standard from

1.5 ug/m3 to 0.15 ug/m3. In conjunction with strengthening the lead standard in 2008,

U.S. EPA promulgated new monitoring requi rements including new design requirements

for the lead monitoring network. Under th is proposal, monitoring requirements stated

there must be one source-oriented lead monito r located near each lead source that

emits one or more tons per year (TPY) to measure the maximum contribution in ambient

air, unless a wavier was granted by the U. S. EPA Regional Administrator. Ohio EPA

submitted its monitoring plan at that time but did not submit an y waivers under this

original proposal.

Subsequently, on December 27, 2010, U.S. EPA revised the original monitoring

requirements from 2008. New monitoring re quirements state there must be one sourceoriented lead monitor located near each lead source than emits 0. 5 or more TPY to

measure the maximum contribution in ambient air, unless a wavier is granted by the

U.S. EPA Regional Administrator. Ac cording to 40 CFR Pa rt 58, Appendix D,

paragraph 4.5(a), a state may apply for a monito ring waiver if they can demonstrate that

a particular source will not contribute to a maximum lead concen tration (based on a

maximum 3-month rolling average over three years of monitori ng data) in ambient air in

### 7 | Pag e 

## excess o

air disp e

followin g

1

2

3

This let t

Facility (

County

Trumbu l

Americ a

Facility

A EP G a

foothills

foreste d

above s

are sho w

e 

## o f 0.075 u g

e rsion mod

g :

) A formal

necessa r

) The det a

) A ny sup p

full air q u

t er is a req u

( herein ref e

and Seve

l l County.

a n Electri c

Backgrou

a vin is loca

of the Ap p

d . Elevatio n

s ea level.

w n by the g /m3 or 50 %

eling, or o t

letter that

r y at a giv e

a iled model

p orting do c

u ality datas

u est for su c

e rred to as

r stal Whe e

c Power – J

nd

t ed along t

p alachian M

s range fr o

AEP Gavi n

symbol. % of the le a

t her mean s

summariz e

n facility,

i ng results

c umentatio n

et with ma p

c h waivers

“AEP Gav

e ling, Inc.

J ames A. G

t he Ohio R

M ountains.

o m 163 to 2

n is show n a d NAAQS

,

s . To apply

e s the ratio

or historic a

n , as noted

p showing m

for Ameri c

i n”) in Galli

(herein re f

G avin Faci

iver in Gal l

Surroundi n

2 78 meter s

n by the , based on

for a wai v

nal for wh y

a l monitori n

above for

m onitor loc a

c an Electri c

i a County,

f erred to a

lity

lia County.

n g terrain i s

s , with sou r

symbol. historical m

v er, U.S. E P

y monitorin g

n g data an a

modeling o

ations.

c Power – J

I. Schuma n

a s “Severs

Gallia C o

s gently rol l

rce elevati o

Surroundi n m onitoring d

P A require s

g should n o

a lysis, and

o r providin g

J ames A. G

n n in Cuya h

tal Warre n

o unty sits i n

l ing and h e

o ns 173 m e

n g lead so u d ata,

s the

o t be

g the

G avin

h oga

n ”) in

n the

e avily

e ters

u rces

### 8 | Pag e 

## Emissi o

There a

the sou t

smaller

since 2 0

e 

## o n Source s

re two oth e

t h is the O h

insignifica n

0 05, from 0 s and Tre n

e r sources o

h io Valley E

n t source.

.73 TPY to n ds

o f lead em i

E lectric Cor p

Lead emis s

0.32 TPY i i ssions wit h

p . - Kyger C

s ions from

n 2009. h in the vici n

C reek Stati o

AEP Gavi n n ity of AE P

o n. Furthe

n have ste a P Gavin. J u

r southwes

a dily decre st to

t is a

ased

### 9 | Page 

## TPY

Emission

s NEI TRI State EI

2005 200

5 200

6 200

7 200

8 200

9 200

5 200

6 2007 2008 2009

AEP

Gavin 2 

## 0.02 0.73 0.53 0.63 0.69 0. 34 0.73 0.53 0.63 0.68 0.32

Kyger

Creek <0.0

0 0.21 0.28 0.22 0.21 0.21 NR NR NR 0.34 0.34

Holzer

Medical

Center <0.0

0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR <0.0

0 <0.0

0 <0.0

0

Table 1: Lead Emi ssions from 2005- 2009

(NR = not reported)

2 

### In 2009 Ohio EPA and AEP Gavin responded regarding over reporting of historic lead emissions in the State EI.

AEP Gavin clarified that the TRI values more accurately represent emissions due to a more robust calculation

method compared to that used in the State EI. Beginning in 2008, AEP Gavin used the more accurate calculation

method in the State EI. 2005, 2006 and 2007 State EI emissions in the table above are corrected per previous

communications with U.S. EPA.

### 10 | Page 

## Source Parameters

The modeled emissions rates correspond to highest reported typ in the National

Emissions Inventory (NEI), Toxics Release In ventory (TRI) or Stat e Emissions Inventory

(State EI). The emission rates per unit were provided by the facility. The total typ

modeled for AEP Gavin is 0.8 TPY.

All lead emission sources ar e stacks. Table 2 shows all the modeled source

parameters.

Sourc

e ID Eastin

g (m) Northin

g (m) Base

Elevatio

n (m) Stack

Height

(m) Temperatu

re (K) Exit

Velocit

y (m/s) Stack

Diamet

er (m) Emissio

n Rate

(TPY)

UNIT

1 40326

0 430991

0 172.82 252.98

4 328.15 14.863 12.801

6 0.42135

6

UNIT

2 40333

0 431004

0 172.82 252.98

4 328.15 14.863 12.801

6 0.39726

6

Table 2 – Source Parameters

Modeling

The sources were modeled using Beeline Softw are’s BEEST Model. This utilizes U.S.

EPA’s American Meteorologic al Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory

Model (AERMOD) model, version 07026. All modeling was completed prior to the

release of AERMOD version 11059. Surface data and upper air data from Huntington

West Virginia (NWS Station 03860) were determined to be r epresentative of the facility

site. AERSURFACE was run using one sector and four seasons. All lead emission

### 11 | Page 

## sources are stacks. Table 2 shows all the modeled source parameters. Two receptor

grids were modeled surrounding this facility. Receptor grid spaci ng is as follows: 100

meters extending out 10km from the facili ty, and 200 meters extending out 16km from

the facility.

Modeling Results

The lead post processor, written and provided by U.S. EPA, was used to calculate a 3-

month rolling average of the lead concentrations. AERMOD modeling output files were

used as input files into the post processo r. The overall maximum 3-month averaged

concentration calculated by the post processor is 0.00 ug/m3 (maximum modeled

monthly average impact at 0. 0012 ug/m3). Due to the tall stacks, it is believed that

modeled concentrations are so low due to great dispersement. This calculated

concentration does not exceed 50% of the NAAQS. Figure 1 shows the maximum

concentration and the concentration gradi ent surrounding the facility.

### 12 | P a g 

## Figur e

Impact A

As indi c

The onl y

Howev e

Creek h

would b e

g e 

## e 1: Maxi m

A nalysis

ated in Ta b

y other so u

e r, Kyger C

h as similarl

e greatly di m um conc e

b le 1 abov e

u rce in the

C reek’s emi

y tall stac k

spersed a s e ntration a

A EP G

e , there ar e

area of p o

ssions are

k s. Ther e

s seen in th nd the co n

G avin Faci l

e two other

o tential sig

significant

e fore, it is

e results fr o n centratio n

l ity

sources in

nificance i s

t ly lower th

believed t

o m the AE P n gradient

the vicinit y

s the Kyge

an AEP G

t hat any p o

P Gavin m o surroundi

y of AEP G

r Creek fa c

avin and K

o tential im p

o deling. ng

avin.

c ility.

K yger

p acts

### 13 | Page 

## Regardless, to be conservative, a backgrou nd value could be added to the results. The

nearest monitor that would represent a backg round value is located in Washington

County near R.H. Gorsuch power plant and the Eramet Marietta facility. This monitor

would likely over-represent ba ckground in the AEP Gavin area.

To determine an appropriate and conservati ve background value, Ohio EPA looked at

the 3-month average concentrations from monitor 39-167-0008 (State Route 676,

Washington Career Center, Marietta, OH ) from 2008 to 2010. The 3-month average

concentrations for each year were averag ed and the highest of the three years was

used as a background value. This value is 0.0073 ug/m3 (see the attached monitor

summary for the computation).

To be conservative, the maximum modeled monthly average impact was added to the

background because rolling 3-month averages were too low for the U.S. EPA lead post

processor to calculate. A total potential im pact considering a co nservative background

value is seen in Table 3:

Post Processor

3-month

Averaged

Concentration

(ug/m3) Maximum

Monthly

Modeled Impact

(ug/m3) Background

(ug/m3) Total Predicted

Concentration

(ug/m3)

0.00 0.00012 0. 0073 0.00742

Table 3: Maximum predic ted lead concentration

This value is well below 50% of the NAAQS, or 0.075 ug/m3.

### 14 | P a g 

## Severs t

Facility

Severst a

County s

residen t

from 25 7

Warren

symbol.

g e 

## t al Warren

Backgrou

a l Warren

s its along t

t ial neighb o

7 to 300 m

is shown b nd

is located w

he Ohio-P e

o rhoods a n

eters, with

b y the w ithin the

e nnsylvani a

n d farm la n

source el e

symbol. S town of W

a border. T h

n d. The te r

e vations 26 7

S urroundin g arren in T r

h e surroun d

r rain is ma

7 meters a

g lead sou r umbull Co

d ing area i s

inly flat. E

a bove sea l e

rces are s unty. Tru m

s predomin

levations r a

evel. Sev e

hown by t h m bull

ately

a nge

e rstal

h e

### 15 | P a g 

## Emissi o

There a

Just to t

one sy m

Further

emissio n

to 0.00 T

g e 

## o n Source s

re six oth e

he southe a

m bol on th e

north are

n s from S e

T PY in 200 s and Tre n

e r sources

a st is one s

e above m a

two addi t

e verstal W a

9. n ds

of lead e m

ource and

a p due to c

ional sour c

a rren have m issions wi t

directly no r

c lose proxi m

c es, again

steadily d e t hin the vi c

r th are thre

mity) all w i

with insi g

e creased s i c inity of Se

e sources (

i th insignifi c

g nificant e m

ince 2005, verstal W a

( represent e

c ant emiss

m issions. L

from 0.58 a rren.

e d by

ions.

Lead

TPY

### 16 | Page 

## TPY

Emission

s NEI TRI State EI

2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 200

5 200

6 200

7 2008 2009

Severstal

Warren <0.0

0 0.54 0.58 0.39 0.35 0.00 0.58 0.57 0.48 0.18 0.00

BFI

Medical

Waste/

Stericycle <0.0

0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02

Trumbull

Memorial

Hospital <0.0

0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.00 0.00 NR NR NR

General

Motors

Lordstow

n <0.0

0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.00 0.00 0.00 <0.0

0 <0.0

0

U.S.

Defense

Warren

Depot <0.0

0 <0.0

0 <0.0

0 <0.0

0 <0.0

0 <0.0

0 NR NR NR NR NR

GE

Lighting

Ohio

Lamp 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 <0.0

0 NR NR NR NR NR

Tecnocap <0.0

0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.00 0.00

Table 4: Lead Emi ssions from 2005- 2009

(NR = not reported)

### 17 | Page 

## Source Parameters

The modeled emissions rates correspond to highest reported typ in the National

Emissions Inventory (NEI), Toxics Release In ventory (TRI) or Stat e Emissions Inventory

(State EI). The emission rates per unit were confirmed by the facility. The total typ

modeled for Severstal Wa rren is 0.58 TPY.

All lead emission sources are stacks and volume sources. The volume sources were

modeled to account for the fugitive lead emi ssions from the blast furnaces (BOFs).

Tables 5 and 6 show all m odeled source parameters.

Source

ID Easting

(m) Northing

(m) Base

Elevation

(m) Stack

Height

(m) Temperature

(K) Exit

Velocity

(m/s) Stack

Diameter

(m) Emission

Rate

(TYP)

BOF1 515904 4562144 267 48.77 39 9.82 13.99 5.18 0.300

BOF2 515904 4562144 267 48.77 39 9.82 13.99 5.18 0.280

Table 5: Point Source Parameters for Severstal Warren

### 18 | Page 

## Source

ID Easting

(m) Northing

(m) Base

Elevation

(m) Release

Height

(m) Emission

Rate

(TYP)

BOF1 515925 4562254 267 59.74 6.12E03

BOF2 515925 4562254 267 59.74 5.71E03

Table 6: Volume Source Parameters for Severstal Warren

Modeling

The sources were modeled using Beeline Softw are’s BEEST Model. This utilizes U.S.

EPA’s American Meteorologic al Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory

Model (AERMOD) model, version 07026. All modeling was completed prior to the

release of AERMOD version 11 059. Surface data from the Youngstown Municipal

Airport (NWS Station 14852) and upper air dat a from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (NWS

Station 94823) were determined to be represent ative of the facility site. AERSURFACE

was run using twelve sectors and four seas ons. One receptor grid was modeled.

Receptors were spaced 50 meters apart ext ending out 23 km, surrounding the facility.

Modeling Results

The lead post processor, written and provi ded by U.S. EPA, was used to calculate a

three-month rolling average of the lead concentrations. AERMOD modeling output files

were used as input files into the post processor. The overall maximum 3-month

averaged concentration calculated by the po st processor is 0.01ug/m3. The maximum

modeled concentration was at 319077.00E, 4493219. 00N, east north east of the facility.

Figure 2 shows the maximum concentration and the concentration gradient surrounding

the facility.

### 19 | P a g 

## Figur e

Impact A

A s indi c

Warren.

Regardl

nearest

part of t

approxi m

g e 

## e 2: Maxi m

A nalysis

c ated in Ta

All of the s

ess, to be

monitor th a

t he first m o

m ately 13 m um conc e

ble 4 abo v

s e sources

c onservati v

a t could re

o nitoring n e

m iles sout h e ntration a

Seversta

v e, there a r

have negli g

v e, a back g

present a b

e twork eva

h east of S e nd the co n

l Warren f a

r e six othe

g ible lead e

g round val u

b ackgroun d

luation un d

e verstal W n centratio n

a cility

r sources i

e missions.

u e could b e

d value is a

d er the ne w

W arren nea r n gradient

i n the vici n

e added to t

a new mon

w standard

r the Ellwo surroundi

n ity of Sev e

t he results

.

n itor install e

. It is lo c

od Engine e ng

e rstal

. The

e d as

c ated

e ring

### 20 | Page 

## facility. Six months of m onitoring data from 2010 is available for this site. To be

conservative, the highest mont hly value during those six mo nths will be used as a

background value. This value is 0.0170 ug /m3 (see the attached monitor summary for

the computation).

The monitor at Ellwood Engineering, which is a 2.49 TPY lead source, was within the

area of highest modeled concentration. Ther efore, this should provide more than

conservative results as a background for this site.

Because there is limited data fr om the Ellwood Engine ering monitor, an alternative was

considered. There are three monitors loca ted in East Liverpool, Columbiana County.

These three monitors serve the area around the Von Roll facility. To determine an

appropriate and conservative background va lue, Ohio EPA look ed at the 3-month

average concentrations from eac h of these monitors from 2008 to 2010. The 3-month

average concentrations for each year were av eraged and the highest of the three years

was used as a background value. This value is 0.0166 ug/m3 (see the attached monitor

summary for the computation) for monitor 39 -029-0019. This monitor is located across

from the Von Roll facility in East Liverpool. Predominant wind directions for this area

indicates emissions from the Von Roll facility would blow directly towards the monitor,

as shown in Figure 3.

### 21 | P a g 

## A total

backgro

g e



## potential i

und monit o F

mpact co n

r as descri igure 3: Pi t

n sidering a

bed above tsburgh W i

conserva t

is seen in T i nd Rose

t ive backg

Table 7: round val u e using e ither

### 22 | P a g 

## These v

I. Schu m

Facility

I. Shu m

Oakwo o

County.

The ter

elevatio n

sym b

g e 

## Post Pr o

month A

Conc e

(u g

0

0

T

v alues are w

m ann

Backgrou

m ann is loc a

o d by the S

Surroun d

rain is m a

n s all appr o

b ol. Surro u o cessor 3-

A veraged

e ntration

g /m3)

.01

.01

T able 7: M

w ell below 5

nd

a ted south e

S ummit C o

d ing area i

a inly flat. E

o ximately 3

u nding lea d Back g

(ug /

0.0

0. 1

aximum p r

5 0% of the

e ast of Cl e

o unty bord

s predomi n

E levations

3 10 meters

d sources a g round

/ m3)

170

1 66

r edicted l e

NAAQS, o r

e veland in

er. Lake

n ately nei g

range fro m

above sea

re shown b Tota l

Concent

0

0

e ad conce n

r 0.075 ug/

Cuyahoga

Erie lies t o

g hborhood s

m 284 to

level. I. S

b y the s y l Predicte d

ration (ug /

0 .0270

0 .0266

n tration

m3.

County n e

o the nort h

s , industry

351 mete r

S chumann

y mbol. d

/ m3)

e ar the to w

h of Cuya h

and farm

r s, with s o

is shown b y w n of

h oga

land.

o urce

y the

### 23 | P a g 

## Emissi o

There a

to the s

sources

north h a

Schum a

from 0. 5

TPY wh

g e 

## o n Source s

re five oth e

s outhwest i

, two of w h

a ve slightl y

a nn. Lea d

5 5 TPY to 0

en viewing s and Tre n

e r sources

i s one so u

h ich have i n

y higher e

d emission s

0 .40 TPY i n

State EI r e n ds

of lead e m

u rce with i n

n significan t

e missions b

s from I. S c

n 2009 wh e

e porting. m issions wit

n significant

t emission s

b ut still in s

c humann h

e n viewing hin the vic i

emission s

s . The re m

s ignificant

h ave stead

TRI repor t i nity of I. S

s . Directly

m aining tw o

compared

ily decrea s

t ing and fr o chumann.

north are

o sources t o

to those

s ed since 2

o m 0.79 to Just

four

o the

of I.

2 005,

0.69

### 24 | Page 

## TPY

Emissions NEI TRI State EI

200

5 200

5 200

6 200

7 200

8 200

9 200

5 200

6 200

7 200

8 200

9

I. Schumann 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.45 0. 45 0.40 NR NR NR 0.7

9 0.6

9

Ford Motor

Walton Hills

Stamping <0.0

0 <0.0

0 <0.0

0 <0.0

0 <0.0

0 <0.0

0 NR NR NR NR NR

Commonwea

lth Aluminum <0.0

0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR

Federal

Metals 0.17 0.17 0.19 0.23 0.04 0. 03 NR NR NR NR NR

Hukill

Chemical <0.0

0 NR NR NR 0.00 NR 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0

Morgan

Electro

Ceramics 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0. 05 0.04 NR NR NR 0.0

0 0.0

0

Table 8: Lead Emi ssions from 2005- 2009

(NR = not reported)

Source Parameters

The modeled emissions rates correspond to highest reported typ in the National

Emissions Inventory (NEI), Toxics Release In ventory (TRI) or Stat e Emissions Inventory

### 25 | Page 

## (State EI). The emission rates per unit were confirmed by the facility. The total typ

modeled for I. Schumann is 0.79 TPY.

All lead emission sources are stacks. Tabl e 9 show all modeled source parameters.

Source

ID Easting

(m) Northing

(m) Base

Elevation

(m) Stack

Height

(m) Temperature

(K) Exit

Velocity

(m/s) Stack

Diameter

(m) Emission

Rate

(TYP)

STACK1 456535.7 4578571 310.23 17.22 352.59 13.14938 1.905 0.233205

STACK2 456588.4 4578508 310.99 7.7114 344.26 16.73617 0.9662 0.007008

STACK3 456517 4578587 309.97 9.1745 372.59 11.22415 1.524 0.003942

STACK4 456533.2 4578551 310.08 17.0688 352.59 14.98833 1.6246 0.448

Table 9: Point Source Parameters for I. Schumann

Modeling

The sources were modeled using Beeline Softw are’s BEEST Model. This utilizes U.S.

EPA’s American Meteorologic al Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory

Model (AERMOD) model, version 07026. A ll modeling was completed prior to the

release of AERMOD version 11059. Surfac e data from the Cleveland International

Airport (NWS Station 14820) and upper air data from Buffalo, New York (NWS Station

14733) were determined to be r epresentative of the facility site. AERSURFACE was

run using twelve sectors and four seasons . Two receptor grids were modeled

surrounding this facility. Receptor grid spac ing is as follows: 100 meters extending out

1km from the facility, and 250 meters ex tending out 2.5km fr om the facility.

### 26 | P a g 

## Modeli n

The lea d

month r o

used a s

concent

concent

maximu

Figur e

g e 

## n g Results

d post pro c

o lling aver a

s input file s

ration calc u

ration was

m concent r

e 4: Maxim u c essor, writ t

a ge of the l

s into the p

u lated by t h

at 456658

.

r ation and t

u m conce n t en and pr o

ead conce n

p ost proce s

h e post pr o

5E, 45786 2

t he concen t

n tration a n

Schu m o vided by U

n trations. A

s sor. The o

o cessor is 0

2 1.0N, nor t

t ration gra d

n d the con c

m ann facil U .S. EPA, w

A ERMOD m

o verall ma x

0 .05 ug/m 3

t h of the fa c

d ient surro u

c entration

ity w as used t

m odeling o

x imum 3- m

3 . The ma x

cility. Fig u

u nding the f

gradient s o calculat e

o utput files w

m onth aver a

x imum mo d

u re 4 show s

f acility.

s urroundi n e a 3-

w ere

a ged

d eled

s the

n g I.

### 27 | P a g 

## Impact A

A s indi c

Schum a

years al

historic a

wind dir e

g e 

## A nalysis

c ated in T

a nn. All of

though tw o

a l years. I n

e ction are s T able 8 a b

these sou r

o sources d

n addition,

s hown in F i

Fi

b ove, ther e

r ces have i

d id have e m

these faci l

i gure 5.

gure 5: Cl e e are five

i nsignifican

m issions re p

l ities are u

e veland W other so u

n t lead emi s

p orted in t h

pwind of I

.

W ind Rose u rces in t h

s sions duri

h e 0.1 to 0

.

. Schuman h e vicinity

ng more r e

. 2 TPY ran g

n. Predom of I.

e cent

e in

inate

### 28 | P a g 

## Regardl

There a

A ny of t

for I. Sc h

The Fir e

monitor

industri a

located

conserv

g e 

## ess, to be

re several

hese moni t

h umann. M

e Station 4

for I. Sc h

a lized area

than wher e

ative back g conserva t

monitors l o

t ors would

M onitors in

Fig u

monitor ( 3

h umann.

and close

e I. Schu m

g round for t t ive, a bac

o cated wit h

conservati v

this indust r

u re 5: Cle v

3 9-035-004 2

This mon

r to the la r

m ann is loc a

t his facility. kground v a

h in the hea

v ely ove r -r e

r ialized are a

v eland Are a

2 ) in Cleve

itor is in

r ge industr

a ted. The r a lue could

a vily indust r

e present a

a are depi c

a Monitor s

e land was c

a more r e

r ial comple x

refore this be added

r ialized are

backgroun

c ted below:

s

c hosen as t

e sidential

x where le

monitor s e to the re s

a of Cleve

d concentr

t he backgr o

section of

ad source s

e rves as a s ults.

land.

ation

o und

this

s are

very

### 29 | Page 

## To determine an appropriate and conservati ve background value, Ohio EPA looked at

the 3-month average concentrati ons from this monitor from 2008 to 2010. The 3-month

average concentrations for each year were av eraged and the highest of the three years

was used as a background value. This value is 0.0176 ug/m3 (see the attached monitor

summary for the computation).

A total potential impact considering a c onservative background value using the

background monitor above is seen in Table 10:

Post Processor 3-

month Averaged

Concentration

(ug/m3) Background

(ug/m3) Total Predicted

Concentration (ug/m3)

0.05 0.0176 0.0676

Table 10: Maximum predicted lead concentration

This value is below 50% of the NAAQS, or 0.075 ug/m3.

Conclusion

This letter addresses the items necessary to apply for a waiver of monitoring

requirements for American Electric Power – Ja mes A. Gavin Facility, Severstal Warren,

and I. Schumann.

The reported emissions from Am erican Electric Power – James A. Gavin Facility were

0.8 TPY but modeling did not identify any loca l areas of high impact around the facility.

Therefore, Ohio requests that U.S. EPA waive the requirement to monitor at this

location.

### 30 | Page 

## The reported emissions from Severstal Wa rren were 0.58 TPY but modeling did not

identify any local areas of high lead impacts around the facility. Therefore, Ohio

requests that U.S. EPA waive the requirem ent to monitor at this location.

The reported emissions from I. Schumann were 0.79 TPY but modeling did not identify

any local areas of high lead impacts around t he facility. Therefore, Ohio requests that

U.S. EPA waive the requirement to monitor at this location.

If you have any questions regarding this r equest, please contact Jennifer Hunter,

Manager, SIP Section, Divis ion of Air Pollution C ontrol at 614-644-3696.

Sincerely,

Robert Hodanbosi

Chief, Division of Air Pollution Control