alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12.2****CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)**I, Albert Leung, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Qiao Xing Universal Telephone, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annualreport that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditorsand the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: June 20, 2006       /s/ ALBERT LEUNG Albert Leung,    Chief Financial Officer
#### O’REAR v. STATE.

No. 22743.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 2, 1944.

W. E. Martin, of Abilene, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The record is before us without bills of exception and without statement of facts. The procedure is regular. Nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
In The Matter Of:

EPA Bristol Bay Hearing, Atrium, Anchorage, Alaska v

August 12, 2014

Midnight Sun Court Reporters

511 W. 9th Ave.

Anchorage, AK 99501

Ph. 907-258-7100

Fax 907-276-6727

To open files, click on the desired file type in bookmark on left.

For quick saving or searching multiple files, click attachments tab (or paperclip) on left.

For best viewing/searching, use Adobe Reader/Acrobat ver. 9 or higher

(www.adobe.com).
#### In the Matter of Sharon L. Somogye, Appellant, v Thomas F. Somogye, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in *Matter of Somogye v Somogye*([appeal No. 1] 167 AD2d 873 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Sedita, Jr., J.—modify maintenance.) Present—Den-man, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1997
THIRD QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       997002
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     139900
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          187864
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         26557
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  409498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1760821
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       225943
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             575942
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  801885
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            478842
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   90000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    39045
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  351049
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1760821
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       416165
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             41797
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      282961
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      324758
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          91407
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                3720
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   95127
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         30240
<NET-INCOME>                                     64887
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    64887
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         40875
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          148576
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of Pathmark Stores, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank G. Vitrano, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |  |        |  | /s/FRANK G. VITRANO                  
| |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  |  | Frank G. Vitrano                     
| |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Financial Officer
| |  | Date:  |  | September 11, 2003                   

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32(ii)**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connect with the quarterly
report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended August 31, 2005 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.



|Date: October 13, 2005 | By: | /s/ Mark V. McDonough                     
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Nevada Geothermal Power Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for
the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and                                    
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                               
|2. | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      andresults of operation of the Company.
|  

Date: January 15,
2008

By: /s/ Brian D. Fairbank   Name: Brian D. Fairbank    Title: Chief
Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Nevada
Geothermal Power Inc. and will be retained by Nevada Geothermal Power Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            7784
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   115768
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2543
<INVENTORY>                                      39307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                203809
<PP&E>                                          359125
<DEPRECIATION>                                (148976)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  420249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           226340
<BONDS>                                          68569
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            10887
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       86026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    420249
<SALES>                                         168157
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                168157
<CGS>                                            59419
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    59419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  38191
<INCOME-TAX>                                     13940
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              24251
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     24251
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
        

</TABLE>
#### Charlotte Mintz et al., Copartners Doing Business as Mint Factors, Appellants, *v.*Robert Karpe, Defendant, and Sol Klayminc, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 14, 1957.

*Edward Collins*for appellants.

*Murray Rafslty*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The lending of money on the security of a chattel mortgage does not violate section 131 of the Banking Law *(Antipyros Co.*v. *Samuel Breiter & Co.,*N. Y. L. J., June 24, 1957, p. 4, col. 7; *Williams-Dexter Co.*v. *Dowland Realty Corp.,*259 N. Y. 581; General Corporation Law, § 18; *Wolf*v. *Aero Factors Corp.,*126 F. Supp. 872, affd. 221 F. 2d 291; *Empire Factors Corp.*v. *1305 Brook Ave. Inc.,*N. Y. L. J., Sept. 12, 1956, p. 10, col. 4). Moreover, section 131 of the Banking Law is not applicable to individuals and the prohibitions therein presented apply only to corporations. The first affirmative defense is therefore insufficient as a matter of law.

The second affirmative defense, even if otherwise available to the defendant, pleads no facts but mere conclusions, and is therefore insufficient.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted, with leave to defendant-respondent to replead the second defense.

Hofstadter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.
#### Randall, Appellant, *v.*Kroeger, Appellee.

(No. 27698

Decided October 4, 1939.)

*Messrs. Conners $ Clarice*and *Mr. Henry J. Zetzer,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Bulhley & Butter,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams and Matthias, JJ., concur.
#### Adolph WESLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22721.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 1, 1943.

H. R. Bishop, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant has filed an affidavit in accordance with the statute, with the request for permission to withdraw the appeal, which is accordingly done.

The appeal is dismissed.
Ex-10.30



 





 




    Exhibit 10.30



 




    TriPath
    Imaging, Inc. 2006 Bonus Plan



 



    On January 26, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the
    Board of Directors of TriPath Imaging, Inc. (the
    “Company”) approved the terms of a bonus plan for
    fiscal year 2006 (the “2006 Bonus Plan”). All
    employees (other than employees who are covered by a sales
    compensation or commission-based plan) are eligible to
    participate in the 2006 Bonus Plan, including all of the
    Company’s executive officers.



 



    Under the 2006 Bonus Plan, the payment of bonus compensation, if
    any, will be based on the achievement of objective corporate
    goals. The objective corporate performance goals for each
    participant will be based on the Company’s 2006 revenues,
    as well as quarterly and annual earnings per share. Bonuses will
    be payable in cash, options or a combination thereof.



 



    Under the 2006 Bonus Plan, the potential payout of bonus
    compensation may range from 0% to a maximum of 100% of the bonus
    target. The bonus target for participants in the 2006 Bonus Plan
    will be based on a percentage of base salary dependent on the
    level of responsibility within the Company. The bonus target for
    each of the Company’s executive officers is set forth below.



 


	 	 	 	 	 
	
 
	
 
	
    Bonus Target

    
	
 

	

    Executive Officer


	
 
	
    (% of Base Salary)
	
 

	 

	

    Paul R. Sohmer, M.D. 
    


	
 
	
 
	
    60
	
    %

	

    President and Chief Executive
    Officer
    


	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	

    Stephen P. Hall
    


	
 
	
 
	
    40
	
    %

	

    Senior Vice President, Chief
    Financial Officer
    


	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	

    Ray W. Swanson, Jr. 
    


	
 
	
 
	
    50
	
    %

	

    Senior Vice President of
    Commercial Operations
    


	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	

    Johnny D. Powers, Ph.D. 
    


	
 
	
 
	
    50
	
    %

	

    Senior Vice President and General
    Manager of TriPath Oncology
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences (BIO) (1110).                    

*Date and Time:*

November 16, 2000; 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.

November 17, 2000; 8:30 a.m.-3 p.m.

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 1235, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Mary E. Clutter, Assistant Director, Biological Sciences, Room 605, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8400.                    

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         The Advisory Committee for BIO provides advice, recommendations, and oversight concerning major program emphases, directions, and goals for the research-related activities of the divisions that make up BIO.                    

*Agenda:*                         GPRA Performance Evaluation and Planning Discussion.                    

Dated: October 16, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-26981 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of National Equipment Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael D. Milligan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|Date: March 30, 2004 | /s/MICHAEL D. MILLIGANMichael D. Milligan Chief
Financial Officer
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAMIR VUCIC,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 23-1662

D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00332-KJD-NJK-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Damir Vucic appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for 

early termination of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1). We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

We need not resolve the parties’ dispute over whether this appeal is barred 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-1662

by the appeal waiver in Vucic’s plea agreement because, even assuming that the

waiver does not apply, Vucic has not shown he is entitled to relief. 

Contrary to Vucic’s contention, the district court expressly considered his 

arguments, including his substantial compliance while on supervision and his 

difficulty finding employment. The court concluded that early termination was 

nonetheless unwarranted in light of Vucic’s delinquent restitution payments, the 

probation officer’s assessment of his personal life as unstable, and the nature and 

circumstances of the underlying armed robbery offense. The court sufficiently 

explained its reasons for denying Vucic’s motion and did not abuse its broad

discretion in denying relief. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1); United States v. Emmett, 

749 F.3d 817, 819-21 (9th Cir. 2014). 

AFFIRMED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2937 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act with respect to the 

guidelines for specification of certain disposal sites for dredged or fill material. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Mr. HURT (for himself, Mr. GRIFFITH of Virginia, Mr. HANNA, and Mr. 

OWENS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act with 

respect to the guidelines for specification of certain disposal sites for dredged or fill material. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commonsense Permit5 ting for Job Creation Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GUIDELINES FOR SPECIFICATION OF CERTAIN DIS7 POSAL SITES. 

8 Section 404(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Con9 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1344(b)) is amended by adding at the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2937 IH

1 end the following new sentence: ‘‘Such guidelines may not 

2 prohibit the specification of a site due to the lack of a 

3 final site plan resulting from the lack of an identified end 

4 user or industry or industrial classification for the site 

5 when determining whether there is a practicable alter6 native to a proposed discharge that would result in less 

7 adverse impact on the aquatic ecosystem.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS