alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: July 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 142)]
[Notices]               
[Page 43518]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26jy10-48]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 
 Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Science, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Advanced Scientific 
Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC). Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these 
meetings be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Tuesday, August 24, 2010, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Wednesday, August 
25, 2010, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: American Geophysical Union, (AGU), 2000 Florida Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20009-1277.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melea Baker, Office of Advanced 
Scientific Computing Research; SC-21/Germantown Building; U. S. 
Department of Energy; 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20585-1290; Telephone (301) 903-7486, (E-mail: 
Melea.Baker@science.doe.gov).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Meeting: The purpose of this meeting is to provide 
advice and guidance with respect to the advanced scientific computing 
research program.
    Tentative Agenda: Agenda will include discussions of the following:

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

ASCR program update.
ARRA update.
ASCAC Exascale Subcommittee report.
Public Comment.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

ASCAC COV report.
Update on GTL Knowledge Base.
Public Comment.

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do 
so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact 
Melea Baker via FAX at 301-903-4846 or via e-mail 
(Melea.Baker@science.doe.gov). You must make your request for an oral 
statement at least 5 business days prior to the meeting. Reasonable 
provision will be made to include the scheduled oral statements on the 
agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee will conduct the meeting to 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Public comment will follow 
the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 30 days at the Freedom of Information Public 
Reading Room; 1G-033, Forrestal Building; 1000 Independence Avenue, 
SW., Washington, DC 20585; between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except holidays.

    Issued in Washington, DC on July 21, 2010.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-18207 Filed 7-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
HISTORI 

c:== Paine l=ield, 

May 29, 2012 

BY FEDERAL EXPRESS 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Y.~" .J U A 'n 1u: 25 

Re: Request for Extension, Docket Number FAA-201 0-0392, Exemption 10092 

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: 

On behalf of Historic Flight Foundation, this is to request extension of 

Exemption 10092 (Docket Number FAA-2010-0392) from 14 CFR Part 119.21 

(a); 119.5 (g); 91.315; and 91.319 (a)(2). 

The name, address and contact information of the exemption holder are 

as follows: 

Historic Flight Foundation ("HFF") 

Attn: John T. Sessions, CEO 

1 0719 Bernie Webber Drive 

Mukilteo, WA 98275 

425.348.3200 or 206.587.4040 

joh 11_@ h istor!cfl_igbt,Qig 

The specific sections of 14 CFR from which HFF seeks exemption are set 

forth above. 

The purpose of this request is to extend the exemption for an additional 

term such that the flight experience program covered by the exemption may be 

continued. In its initial two years, the program has allowed HFF to demonstrate 

the flying characteristics the world's oldest B-25 Mitchell bomber with patrons 

aboard and in doing so, sustain its educational mission. The public interest is 

served through preservation of aviation heritage and dynamic presentation of 

American history. 

In the first two years of operation, the conditions of exemption have been 

fulfilled and all flights have been safely conducted. HFF expects this safety 

record to continue. 

107"19 Bernie Webber Drive • Mukilteo, WA 98275-5011 • 425-348-3200 
Letter to U.S. Department of Transportation 

May 29, 2012; page 2 

In summaty, this is to request extension of Exemption 10092 (Docket 

Number FAA-2010-0392) from 14 CFR Part 119.21 (a); 119.5 (g); 91.315; and 

91.319 (a)(2) to allow Historic Flight Foundation continuation of its flight 

experience program in its North American B-250, N88972. The public interest is 

served through preservation of aviation heritage and dynamic presentation of 

American history. Historic Flight Foundation's high standards have resulted in an 

unblemished record of safe flights. 

This request for extension of exemption is limited to the territory of the 

United States. 

Please contact the undersigned should you have questions or further 

requirements. Thank you for your consideration. 

JTS:mm
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2842 

To create competition in the Department of Agriculture’s canned tuna purchasing program to strengthen the Department’s buying power, increase 

the availability of canned tuna to school lunch, child nutrition, and 

other Federal nutrition programs, and create jobs in the domestic canning industry. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2013 

Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California (for herself, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mrs. 

NAPOLITANO, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. ISSA, Mr. SALMON, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. 

BARROW of Georgia, and Mr. PETERS of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in 

addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To create competition in the Department of Agriculture’s 

canned tuna purchasing program to strengthen the Department’s buying power, increase the availability of 

canned tuna to school lunch, child nutrition, and other 

Federal nutrition programs, and create jobs in the domestic canning industry. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2842 IH

1 SECTION 1. IMPROVED COMPETITION IN THE DEPART2 MENT OF AGRICULTURE CANNED TUNA PUR3 CHASING PROGRAM. 

4 Not later than 90 days after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act, the Secretary shall revise the Agricul6 tural Marketing Service Master Solicitation and Supple7 ment specifications for the purchase of canned tuna to re8 quire that— 

9 (1) all such tuna be landed by United States 

10 flagged fishing vessels; 

11 (2) not less than 75 percent of the value of 

12 such tuna be produced in the United States; and 

13 (3) all such tuna be canned in the United 

14 States, including the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, 

15 the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Is16 lands, or territories or possessions of the United 

17 States. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### TRAVIS v. STATE.

No. 22385.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 3, 1943.

J. R. Bogard, of San Augustine, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Hog theft is the offense; the punishment, two years in the state penitentiary.

No bills of exception accompany the record.

There appears, what is denominated, a statement of facts, but such is not subject to be considered by us because same is neither signed nor approved by the trial judge.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 10.32


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


 


 


This FIRST AMENDMENT, made
and entered into as of this 22nd day of December, 2005, supplements,
forms part of, and is subject in all respects to, that certain Consulting
Agreement dated as of January 1, 2002, by
and between Waddell & Reed, Inc. (the “Company”) and Robert L. Hechler (“Consultant”)
(the “Agreement”).  Capitalized terms
used herein, unless otherwise defined, have the meanings specified in the Agreement.


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Consultant entered into the Agreement
whereby the Company engaged Consultant as an independent consultant to assist
with the daily business and affairs of the Company; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Agreement commenced on January 1, 2002 (the “Effective Date”) and is effective
for five (5) successive years beginning on the Effective Date; and


 


WHEREAS, the Agreement terminates on December 31, 2006
(the “Termination Date”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company wishes to retain Consultant’s
services for an additional year beyond the Termination Date; and


 


WHEREAS, Company and Consultant wish to extend the terms
of the Agreement and amend the Agreement to provide for an extension of the Termination
Date.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in recognition of the mutual promises herein,
and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.                                       The first sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement
is amended to read as follows:


 


The term of this Agreement is six (6) successive years beginning on the
Effective Date, unless terminated earlier as set forth in this Section 2.


 


2.                                       That all other terms of the Agreement will remain
in full force and effect without amendment or interruption.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
each of the parties to this Agreement has caused this Agreement to be executed
as of the date first above written.


 


	
  WADDELL
  & REED, INC.

  	
  CONSULTANT

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Daniel P. Connealy

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Robert L. Hechler

  	
   

  
	
  Daniel P. Connealy

  	
  Robert L. Hechler

  
	
  Senior Vice President
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                           [KPMG LOGO AND LETTERHEAD]

The Board of Directors
Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-76229) of Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd. of our
report dated February 5, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000
and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the three year
period ended December 31, 2000 and the related schedule, which report appears
in the December 31, 2000 Form 10-K of Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd.

/s/KPMG

KPMG
Hamilton, Bermuda
March 12, 2001

[KPMG LOGO]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM TECH-SYM CORPORATION FORM 10-Q SECOND QUARTER 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          31,963
<SECURITIES>                                     1,819
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,017
<ALLOWANCES>                                       742
<INVENTORY>                                     20,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,662
<PP&E>                                          81,679
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,878
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           815
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,033
<SALES>                                         87,298
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,298
<CGS>                                           62,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,485)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,602
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,983
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,619
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,619
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|                                                |  |                                              
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Subsidiary                                      |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|                                                |  |                                              
|Midwest Bank and Trust Company                  |  | Illinois                                     
|Midwest Bank of Western Illinois                |  | Illinois                                     
|Porter Insurance Agency, Inc.                   |  | Illinois                                     
|Midwest Bank Insurance Services, L.L.C          |  | Illinois                                     
|MBHI Capital Trust I                            |  | Delaware                                     
|MBHI Capital Trust II                           |  | Delaware                                     
|MBTC Investment Company                         |  | Nevada                                       
|Midwest Financial and Investment Services, Inc. |  | Illinois
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63846-63847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Systems 
Technology for the Future U.S. Strategic Posture will meet in closed 
session on November 13-14, 2000, at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska. 
This Task Force will review the likely nature and evolution of 
potential future strategic challenges to the U.S., advanced 
technologies for nuclear weapons systems and non-nuclear strategic 
weapons systems, and advanced C4ISR technology applications for 
strategic contingencies.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this 
meeting, the Defense Science Board Task Force will consider the extent 
to which technologies and systems currently being developed and applied 
for regional contingencies are relevant and applicable to future 
strategic contingencies; take into account

[[Page 63847]]

affordability and arms control constraints; look at possible further 
future ballistic missile defense technology to the extent that 
ballistic missile defense relates to the overall future strategic 
posture; and consider strategies for using the national strategic 
technology base to deal with, or hedge against, the uncertainties and 
ambiguities inherent in the nature and timing of emergence of possible 
strategic threats, including possible dissuasion of such threats; and, 
consider the capability of the technology and industrial base to 
respond in time to long-term strategic warning in various forms, 
including the adequacy and responsiveness of DoD's science and 
technology programs.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that this Defense Science Board meeting concerns 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly 
these meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: October 19, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-27320 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed August 23, 2021 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00153-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF A.D.A., C.R.A., J.M.A., CHILDREN 

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-05934 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

When appellant Jose Arevalo failed to request the reporter’s record, we 

ordered this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and appellant’s brief due 

by July 21, 2021. When no brief was filed, we notified appellant by postcard dated 

July 26, 2021 and directed him to file his brief and a motion for an extension of time 

by August 5, 2021. We cautioned appellant that the failure to file a brief by that date 

would result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.8(a)(1). 

To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), 

(c). 

210153F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF A.D.A., 

C.R.A., J.M.A., CHILDREN 

No. 05-21-00153-CV 

 On Appeal from the 330th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-05934. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns. Justices Molberg and 

Goldstein participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered August 23, 2021
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">   <br>2015-987 N CIvery Bell, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Greg Estevez, Doing Business as GREG HOME IMPROVEMENT, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Nassau County, First District, (Joy M. Watson, J.), entered December 5, 2014. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $2,575.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover the sum of $5,000 which plaintiff had paid defendant for work to be performed by defendant under a construction contract, but which work had allegedly not been performed. Following a nonjury trial, the District Court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $2,575. Defendant appeals.</p><p>In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (UDCA 1807; <i>see</i> UDCA 1804; <i>Ross v Friedman</i>, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000]). Furthermore, the determination of a trier of fact as to issues of credibility is given substantial deference, as a trial court's opportunity to observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses affords it a better perspective from which to assess their credibility (<i>see Vizzari v State of New York</i>, 184 AD2d 564 [1992]; <i>Kincade v Kincade</i>, 178 AD2d 510, 511 [1991]). This deference applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court (<i>see Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d at 126). </p><p>Upon a review of the record, we find that the District Court's determination is supported by the record and provided the parties with substantial justice (<i>see</i> UDCA 1804, 1807).</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.</p><p>Iannacci, J.P., and Brands, J., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: October 31, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### MARTIN v. STATE.

No. 22077.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 15, 1942.

Hoover, Hoover & Cussen, of Canadian, and R. T. Correll, of Perryton, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell., State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for murder, punishment assessed being four years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record. Appellant filed a number of objections to the court’s instructions to the jury, but in the absence of the facts we are in no position to appraise said obj ections.

The judgment is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Joytoto USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Seong Yong
      Cho, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                April 15, 2008
            /s/
                Seong Yong ChoBy:
                Seong Yong ChoIts:
                Chief Executive Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Joytoto USA, Inc. and will be retained by Joytoto USA, Inc. and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.