alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
consolidated condensed balance sheets and statement of income.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000095676
<NAME>                        Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         635,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,872,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,277,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,681,600
<PP&E>                                      28,925,200
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,253,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,082,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,355,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,072,900
<COMMON>                                       291,300
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,229,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,082,900
<SALES>                                     29,663,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,663,300
<CGS>                                       18,843,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,612,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (74,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,928,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,803,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   367,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            265,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,436,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.69)
        



</TABLE>
#### Webb et al., Appellants, *v.*Fairchild et al., Exrs., et al., Appellees.

(No. 27714

Decided November 15, 1939.)

*Mr. Walter Dressel*and *Messrs. Mouser é Mouser,*for appellants.

*Messrs. Wilhelm S Robinson*and *Mesérs. Olds é McCarty,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
RUSTY TABAIS MIMS-OLIVER, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5832

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 3, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Ross Goodman, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2775 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2775

To condition the provision of premium and cost-sharing subsidies under 
  the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act upon a certification 
that a program to verify household income and other qualifications for 
         such subsidies is operational, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2013

  Mrs. Black introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To condition the provision of premium and cost-sharing subsidies under 
  the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act upon a certification 
that a program to verify household income and other qualifications for 
         such subsidies is operational, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONDITIONING PROVISION OF ACA PREMIUM AND COST-SHARING 
              SUBSIDIES UPON CERTIFICATION THAT A PROGRAM TO VERIFY 
              HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND OTHER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THOSE 
              SUBSIDIES IS OPERATIONAL.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no premium tax credits 
shall be allowed under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
and no reductions in cost-sharing shall be allowed under section 1402 
of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18071) 
before the date that the Secretary of Health and Human Services 
certifies to the Congress that there is in place a program that 
verifies, consistent with section 1411 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 18081), 
the household income and coverage requirements of individuals applying 
for such credits and cost-sharing reduction.
                                 <all>
```
# White Cane Safety Day, 2000

Last month at the Olympic Games in Sydney, American runner Marla Runyan made history in the women's 1500-meter race. She was not considered a favorite in the event and won no medals, placing ninth in the final competition. But as the first legally blind athlete ever to qualify for and compete in an Olympic event, Marla set an extraordinary precedent and proved to millions of people across the globe that disability need not be a limitation on achievement or a barrier to success.

Marla Runyan's accomplishment reflects the spirit of two historic pieces of legislation whose milestone anniversaries we celebrate this year. Ten years ago, the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law to guarantee access to public accommodations and services and to outlaw workplace discrimination for people with disabilities. Twenty-five years ago, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act became law, ensuring that people with disabilities have access to a free and appropriate public education. Both of these laws have made a significant impact on the lives of millions of Americans with disabilities by allowing them to pursue their dreams and make their own contributions to our society.

But even before passage of these landmark laws, the white cane was helping to open doors of opportunity for many blind and visually impaired Americans. With proper training, people using the white cane can enjoy greater mobility and safety by determining the location of curbs, steps, uneven pavement, and other physical obstacles in their path. The white cane has given them the freedom to travel independently to their schools and workplaces and to participate more fully in the life of their communities.

The white cane is a simple tool, but, like Marla Runyan's accomplishments, it reminds us that the only barriers against people with disabilities are discriminatory attitudes and practices that our society has too often placed in their way. As we observe White Cane Safety Day, let us reaffirm our commitment to building a society where we embrace the talents, energy, and contributions of every individual.

To honor the many achievements of blind and visually impaired citizens and to recognize the white cane's significance in advancing independence, the Congress, by joint resolution approved October 6, 1964, has designated October 15 of each year as “White Cane Safety Day.”

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim October 15, 2000, as White Cane Safety Day. I call upon the people of the United States, government officials, educators, and business leaders to observe this day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.                          ( print page 62990)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 00-27113

Billing code 3195-01-P
Group 1 – Google’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief 

(Civil Case Nos. 6:20-cv-00571-ADA, 6:20-cv-00578-ADA, 6:20-cv-00583-ADA, and 6:20-

cv-00584-ADA) 

EXHIBIT #5 

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 2 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 3 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 4 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 5 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 6 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 7 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 8 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 9 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 10 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 11 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 12 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 13 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 38-5 Filed 02/12/21 Page 14 of 14
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ Project No.: 0172.07.029.040 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1 _ of __1

_

Project Name: Steam Electric Rulemaking

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call Date: 01/21/2010 Time: 3:00 pm EST

Company Name: Headwaters Resources, Inc. Contact Name: Lance Staron

Phone No.: 801-984-9453

Name: Kurt Blohm, Elizabeth Sabol Eastern Research Group

GENERAL SUBJECT : Potential Changes to the As h Handling Part of the Steam Electric ICR

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

Kurt Blohm and I contacted Lance Staron, Headwaters Re sources, Inc., on Thursday, January 21, to discuss the potential changes that EPA was considering making to Pa rt C (Ash Handling) of the questionnaire. We talked with Mr. Staron regarding his thoughts about these potential changes. Below is a summary of the call.

Mr. Staron stated that he th inks the ash handling system-level approach for Part C is a good id ea. He stated that this change would avoid some confusi on for plants in cases where one system services more than one unit or vice versa. Mr. Staron agreed that plan ts usually identify ash handling system s on a system level, not an electric generating unit level.

Mr. Staron stated that he is unaware of any systems that pneumatically transfer and/or stor e both fly and bottom ash together. However, he made it clear that he main ly deals with fly ash hand ling systems and does not know all options regarding the bottom ash indus try. He explained that facilities us ually handle fly ash separately so they can market the ash. If a facili ty combined everything (i.e., bottom/ec onomizer ash) with fly ash, the value would decrease drastically a nd the ash would fail the ASTM standard test for beneficial reuse. The combination of fly and bottom ash also changes the class of the as h. Mr. Staron explained the di fferences between Class C

and Class F ash.

Mr. Staron stated that during his review of the questionnai re, he did not see the request for the class of the fly ash. He suggested that we include a re quest for the class of the ash in Part C to help distinguish some of the properties of the ash. For example, he explained that Class C ash has more calcium and is hard to handle (especially if wet) than Class F ash.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1213** 

In re: MYRON RODERICK NUNN , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 1:10

- cv - 00164

- CCE

- LPA )

Submitted : June 16 , 2011 Decided: June 20, 2011

Before NI EMEYER and GREGORY , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Myron Roderick Nunn, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Myron R oderick Nunn petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition . He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Nunn’s petition on June 7, 2011 **.** Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Nunn’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentio ns are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3096 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3096

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 2013

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To designate the building occupied by the Federal Bureau of 
  Investigation located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, as the 
           ``Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building occupied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation 
located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center'' 
during the period in which the building is occupied by the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    During the period in which the building referred to in section 1 is 
occupied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, any reference in a 
law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to that building shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
----

----

| 1.   | The Report      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |   | TELTRONICS,      INC.                                                             |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   |   /s/      Ewen R. Cameron                                              |
|   August      14, 2008 |   | Ewen R.      Cameron                                                              |
|                        |   | Director,      President, Chief Executive OfficerAnd      Chief Financial Officer |
|                        |   |                                                                              |
2154 78TH STREET . BLAIRSTOWN . IOWA . 52209 1

Mr. Kurt Gustafson

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

1310L St. NW, Washington, DC 20005

May 24th 2012

Re; Fiberight MSW separation plan – Reporting and Compliance Requirements

Dear Mr. Gustafson

This letter serves as an addendum to Fiberight's MSW separation plan, 

originally submitted to EPA on October 11th 2011, and incorporates supplemental

information requested by your office. Specifically, Fiberight affirms that it will 

provide ongoing reporting to EPA to demonstrate verification that there is 

separation of recyclable paper, cardboard, plastics, rubber, textiles, metals and 

glass wastes as detailed in the MSW separation plan.

Fiberight’s MSW separation plan is subject to compliance with relevant 

regulations of the East Central Iowa Council of Governments (ECICOG) solid 

waste management comprehensive plan (“comp plan”), and is further overseen 

by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). Fiberight’s obligations 

under these regulations include, but are not limited to, the following reporting 

requirements;

“b) Fiberight agrees to provide ECICOG with a copy of their semi-annual reports 

to the Iowa Department of Natural Resources, including the following information;

• Tonnage figures, origin, and final disposition of all waste/recyclable materials 

accepted/processed at Fiberight’s facility

• Tonnage figures and final disposition of residual materials

• Documentation of waste diversion activities such as copies of print material 

and/or advertising etc. that concern waste reduction, recycling, and waste 

diversion.

Fiberight hereby affirms that it will provide copies of all semi-annual reports 

sent to ECICOG and IDNR, to EPA.

Sincerely

Craig Stuart-Paul

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tektronix, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 1, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
H. Wills, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 14, 2003


/s/ RICHARD H. WILLS
-------------------------------------
Richard H. Wills
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### CHILDS v. STATE.

No. 23556.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 22, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is burglary. The penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for twelve years.

The indictment and all matters of procedure appear to be in regular form. The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 23
 
 
   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
  The Board of Directors
 Citizens South Banking Corporation
 Gastonia, North Carolina
   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-103218, 333-77657 and 333-111228) of Citizens South Banking Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated March 12, 2010, related to the audits of the consolidated statements of condition as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which are included in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Citizens South Banking Corporation and subsidiaries.
   /s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.
  Gastonia, North Carolina
 March 12, 2010
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Brian J. Martin,
President (chief executive officer) of the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor TrustSeries C (Series C), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 996 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Cs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series C.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                         |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 
|/s/ BRIAN J. MARTIN                                                      |  |  |  | 
|                                                                         |  |  |  | 
|President (chief executive officer) of the Managing Owner March 29, 2004 |  |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**MELISSA MARIE SPRING,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 191 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 6th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**