UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 2771 1 

OFFICE OF 

AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

AND STANDARDS 

MEMORANDUM 

Subject: Documentation of Future Year Ozone and Annual PM2.5 Design Values 

From: and Standards 

The purpose of this memo is to provide projected future year ozone and annual PM2.5 

desim values for monitors in the Western United States based on the air quality modeling in 

support of EPA's recently proposed Federal Implementation Plans to ~edice iterstate ~&s~ort 

of Particulate Matter and Ozone (Transport ~ule).' The memo further describes how these 

projected design values can be used to establish which monitors should be further evaluated to 

determine if emissions from other states significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere 

with maintenance at these sites. 

The proposed Transport Rule addresses actions that States must take in order to 

eliminate transport of emissions that significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with 

maintenance of the 1997 %hour ozone and 1997 PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS), as well as the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, in other states. The air quality modeling EPA 

used in support of the Transport Rule is documented in the "Air Quality Modeling Technical 

Support Document: Transport Rule Proposal" (hereafter referred to as the "TSD"). The 

document can be found at htta://www.eva.gov/airaualitv/tran~vort/tech.html. 

The transport rule modeling specifically evaluated eastern States' contribution to 

nonattainment or interference with maintenance to areas in other States. The transport rule did 

not evaluate the contribution to nonattainment or the interference with maintenance of states in 

the western portion of the continental United States. These western States were, however, 

included in the Transport Rule modeling domain. Therefore, the modeling results from the 

I The Transport Rule webpage can be found here: httD://www.eaa.~ov/airtransvort The Transport Rule 

NPR Federal Register notice can be found here: 75 FR 45,2010 (Aug. 2,2010) 

Internet Address (URL) . hHp://www.epa.gov 

RecycledlReoyclable Printed wlh Vegetable 01 Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Mlnlmum 25% Postconsumer) 
western portion of the modeling domain can be used to project future air quality at monitors in 

these western States. 

The Transport Rule modeling TSD contains detailed information on the model setup, 

emissions, meteorology, and model results for the Transport Rule modeling. The air quality 

model used for the Transport Rule was the CAMx photochemical model (http:llcamx.com/). 

EPA performed air quality modeling for a 2005 base year and a 2012 "no CAIR" base case.' 

The modeling for 2005 was used as the base year for projecting air quality at monitors to the 

future. The 2012 base case modeling was used to identify future nonattainment and maintenance 

monitor locations and to quantify the contributions of emissions from sources in upwind states to 

concentrations of PM2,5, and 8-hour ozone at downwind monitoring receptors. 

The CAMx modeling was completed using a 36 km Continental U.S. modeling domain 

and a nested 12 km Eastern U.S. domain. Figure 1 shows the location of the domain boundaries 

and Table 2 provides details on the horizontal and vertical grid specifications. Additional details 

on model setup and performance can be found in the TSD. 

Figure 1. Transport Rule air quality modeling domains. 

? In support of tlie Transport Rule, EPA performed additional modeling for a 2014 ''no CAIR base case, 

and a 2014 control case that reflects tlie en~issions reductions expected fsom the Transport Rule etnissions 

budgets (i.e., the "remedy" scenario). EPA used the 2014 remedy case tnodeling as part of the analysis to 

quantify the air quality and health benefits from the rule. 
3 

Table 1. Specifications of the air quality modeling domains. 

EPA analyzed out-of-state contributions to monitors projected to show nonattainment and 

maintenance problems in 2012 for the 38 States that were fully contained in the 12 km Eastern 

U.S. domain. In the Transport Rule, EPA made no specific findings for Western States, 

including those that were not fully contained within the Eastern U.S. 12 km d~main.~ The 

modeling TSD contains information on the future year design value projection methodology 

(Section 111) as well as the projected ozone and PM2.j design values for each monitoring site in 

the 12 km modeling domain (Appendix B). 

Map Projection 

Grid Resolution 

Coordinate Center 

True Latitudes 

Dimensions 

Vertical extent 

The future year projection methodology used the CAMx air quality modeling results in a 

"relative" sense to project future concentrations of ozone and PM2.5 at monitors. Rather than use 

the absolute model-predicted future year ozone and PM2.5 concentrations, EPA used the base 

year and future year predictions to calculate a (relative) percent change in ozone and PM2.5 

concentrations. In this approach, the ratio of future year model predictions to base year model 

predictions are used to adjust ambient measured data up or down depending on the relative 

(percent) change in model predictions for each location. The use of ambient data as part of the 

calculation helps to constrain the future year design value predictions, even if the absolute model 

concentrations are over-predicted or under-predicted. I11 other words, anchoring the future 

predictions to monitored values in the base case, helps to mitigate model performance issues. As 

described in the TSD, the procedures for projecting PMzj and 8-hour ozone concentrations 

conform to the methodologies contained in the modeling guidance for attainment demonstration 

modeling4. 

Nonattainment and Maintenance Receptors 

36 x 36 km Domain 

' EPA did not conduct a contribution analysis or make any specific findings for New Mexico, Colorado, 

Wyoming, and Montana since they are only partially contained within the 12km modeling domain. 

12 x 12 km Domain 

4 U.S. EPA, 2007: Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of 

Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM2,5, and Regional Haze; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 

Research Triangle Park, NC. htt~:llww.e~a.~ov/ttn/scram/~uidance/~uide/final-O3-pm-r11- 

~uidance.pdf 

Lalnbert Conformal Projection 

36 km 12 km 

97 deg W, 40 deg N 

33 deg N and 45 deg N 

148x112~14 279x240~ 14 

14 Layers: Surface to 100 millibar level 

(see Table 11-3) 
The Transport Rule proposal identifies states whose emissions contribute significantly to 

lionattainment andlor interfere with maintenance of the 1997 ozone and PM2 5 NAAQS in other 

states. I11 order to make these findings, EPA needed to address how to define "nonattainment" 

and "maintenance" and to identify the monitors that would be suitable for evaluation. For the 

Transport Rule proposal, EPA defined nonattainment and maintenance as follows: 

Design values of ozone and PMzs in 2012 were estimated by applying the 2005 to 2012 

relative change in model-predicted ozone or PM2.5 species5 concentrations to the measured 

(2003-2007) ozone or PM2.5 species concentrations. For each ozone or PM2.5 monitoring site, all 

valid design values (up to 3) from this period were averaged together. Because 2005 is included 

in all three design value periods, this has the effect of creating a 5-year weighted average, where 

the middle year is weighted 3 times, the 2'ld and 4"' years are weighted twice, and the lS' and 5"' 

years are weighted once. EPA referred to this as the "5-year weighted average" concentration 

(or 5-year weighted average design value). 

EPA then used the 5-year weighted average design values to project ambient 

concentrations for the 2012 scenario in order to determine which monitoring sites are expected to 

be nonattainment for the future year scenario. We also projected 2012 design values for each of 

Lhe individual 3-year design value periods (i.e., 2003-2005,2004-2006, and 2005-2007). The 

projection of design values for these individual three year periods was used to determine sites 

expected to have maintenance problems in the 2012 base case. 

For annual average PM2.5 concentrations, any value that is greater than or equal to 15.05 

l.lglni3 is rounded to 15.1 l.lg/m3 and is considered to be violating the NAAQS. This approach is 

consistellt with the truncation and rounding procedures for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. 

Thus, monitor sites with future year annual PM2.5 design values of 15.05 l.lg/m3 or greater, based 

on the projection of 5-year weighted average concentrations, are predicted to be nonattainment 

sites. Sites with future year maxi~lium design values (based on the highest of the three design 

values projected to 2012, as described above) of 15.05 &m3 or greater are predicted to be 

maintenance sites. We use the term "nonattainment sites" to refer to those sites that are 

projected to exceed the NAAQS based on both the average and maximum design values. Those 

sites that are projected to be attainment based on the average design value but exceed the 

NAAQS based on the maximum design value are referred to as maintenance sites. 

The future year ozone design values are truncated to integers6 in units of ppb. This 

approach is consistent with the truncation and rounding procedures for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS. Future year design values that are greater than or equal to 85 ppb are considered to be 

violating the NAAQS. Sites with future year 5-year weighted average ozone design values of 85 

5 The PM2,~ species include sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, particle bound water, elemental carbon, salt, other 

primaly PM2.5, and organic aerosol mass (by difference). Organic aerosol mass by difference is defined 

as the difference between FRM PM2.s and the sum of the other components. 

6 The documented ozone design values include values to the tenths digit. Therefore, based on truncation 

to an integer, any value that is less than or equal to 84.9 ppb is < 85 ppb. Any value that is greater than or 

equal to 85.0 ppb is violating the NAAQS. 
ppb or greater are predicted to be nonattainment. Sites with future year maximum design values 

of 85 ppb or greater are predicted to be future year maintenance sites. 

2012 Model Results for the West 

We have used the approach of the proposed Transport Rule to identify monitors in the 

West that are projected to show nonattainment or maintenance problems in 2012. EPA did not 

evaluate the contribution of the western states to other states in the proposed Transport Rule. 

However, as shown in Figure 1, the western states are within the scope of the 36 km modeling 

domain. Therefore, future year projected design values for western states can be calculated from 

the modeling. Using the same approach as used in the transport rule, we are able to evaluate 

whether monitors in these western states should be considered maintenance receptors for 

purposes of other section 110(a)(2)(D) actions. 

Appendix A and B contain the model projected 2012 design values for 8-hour ozone and 

annual average PM2.5 for the West. This includes design values for the States of Montana, 

Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, Idaho, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, and 

California. The 2012 design values for the rest of the continental U.S. is documented in 

Appendix B of the Transport Rule Air Quality Modeling TSD. 

Appendix A contains projected 2012 annual PM2.5 (1997 NAAQS) design values based 

on the average ambient design values and the maximum ambient design values. Appendix B 

contains projected 2012 8-hour ozone (1997 NAAQS) design values based on the average 

ambient design values and the maximum ambient design value. As noted above, sites with 2012 

average design values above the NAAQS are considered nonattainment sites. Sites with 2012 

maximum design values above the NAAQS are considered maintenance sites. 

Additional ozone information is included in Appendix C. Appendix C contains design 

value information for ozone monitoring sites in the West where 2012 projected design values 

could not be calculated from the Transport Rule modeling results. This was due to a limited 

number of "high" modeled ozone days. The Transport Rule ozone design value projection 

methodology followed the recommended procedure from the ozone modeling guidance. In order 

to calculate a valid future year design value, the relative change in modeled ozone must be based 

on the average of at least 5 modeled days with base year co~lcentrations of >= 70 ppb. No future 

year design values were calculated for sites which did not meet this criteria. Consistent with the 

modeling guidance and the Transport Rule, future year ozone design values were not calculated 

for sites which did not meet the minimum data requirements. Appendix C contains the sites 

which have valid base year design value data (at least one complete design value in the 2003- 

2007 period), but no valid 2012 projected design value. 

Note: There are nutnerous monitoring sites in the States of New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, 

and Monta~~a which are in both the 36 km and 12 km CAMx modeling domains. Only thc 12km 

results for these sites are included in Appendix A and B. The appendices notc where the design 

values were extracted fiom the 12 km model results. 
Appendix A 

Base year 2003-2007 and Future Year 2012 Annual Average PM2.5 

Design Values- Western States 
Average 

Design 

Value 

2003-2007 

(uglm3) 

7 

6.49 

8.94 

12.17 

12.59 

9.97 

6.04 

5.85 

7.77 

5.71 

12.94 

9.44 

9.34 

12.73 

7.77 

7.39 

9:47 

16.99 

16.38 

17.17 

12.71 

8.39 

9.2 

5.25 

18.94 

18.68 

19.17 

17.28 

4.62 

17.03 

18.19 

18 

15.35 

17.66 

17.92 

15.36 

16.62 

15.21 

8.42 

6.46 

14.78 

6.96 

5.16 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2012 

(uglm3) 

6.97 

6.64 

8.68 

11.78 

11 92 

9.6 

5.9 

5.73 

8.06 

5.66 

13.43 

9.83 

10.15 

12.65 

7.33 

7.14 

9.95 

15.86 

14.93 

15.68 

12.36 

8.33 

9.14 

5.22 

17.11 

17.37 

18.11 

15.83 

4.78 

16.94 

18.25 

18.14 

14.52 

17.54 

17.93 

15.6 

16.19 

14.29 

8.26 

6.64 

13.85 

6.93 

4.94 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2003-2007 

(uglm3) 

7.06 

6.87 

8.98 

12.54 

12.59 

10.23 

6.18 

6 

8.37 

5.92 

13.69 

9.67 

9.6 

13.51 

7.82 

7.39 

9.8 

17.44 

16.4 

17.23 

12.9 

8.61 

9.43 

5.52 

19.21 

19.56 

20.31 

17.56 

4.81 

18.19 

19.68 

19.61 

15.35 

18.73 

19.17 

16.78 

17.27 

15.21 

8.91 

6.83 

14.96 

7.01 

5.25 

Modeling 

results 

from 

12km 

domain? 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2012 

(uglm3) 

6.9 

6.28 

8.65 

11.43 

11 92 

9.35 

5.77 

5.59 

7.49 

5.45 

12.7 

9.6 

9.87 

11.92 

7.3 

7.13 

9.62 

15.46 

14.91 

15.64 

12.18 

8.12 

8.92 

4.98 

16.86 

16.6 

17.1 

15.59 

4.59 

15.86 

16.87 

16.66 

14.52 

16.54 

16.77 

14.28 

15.59 

14.29 

7.81 

6.28 

13.69 

6.88 

4.84 
Monitor ID 

6057100? 

60590007 

60592022 

60610006 

6063100Ei 

60631 009 

60651003. 

60652002 

60658001 

-- 60670006 

60670010 

60674001 

60710025 

60710306 

60712002 

60718001 

6071 9004 

60730001 

60730003 

60730006 

60731002 

- 60731010 

60750005 

60771002 

60792006 

60798001 

6081 1001 

6083001 1 

60850005 

-- 60852003 

60890004 

60950004 

60970003 

60990005 

61010003 

61072002 

611 10007 

61 110009 

61112002 

61113001 

61131003 

80010006 

80050005 

80130003 

State 

Caiifornia 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

Caiifornia 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

Caiifornia 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

Caiifornia 

Caiifornia 

California 

California 

California 

California 

Caiifornia 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

California 

Colorado 

Colorado 

Colorado 

County 

Nevada 

Oranqe 

Orange 

Placer 

Plumas 

Plumas 

Riverside 

Riverside 

Riverside 

Sacramento 

Sacramento 

Sacramento 

San Bernardino 

San Bernardino 

San Bernardino 

San Bernardino 

San Bernardino 

San Diego 

San Dig0 

San Diego 

San Diego 

San Diego 

San Francisco 

San Joaquin 

San Luis Obispo 

San Luis Obispo 

San Mateo 

Santa Barbara 

Santa Clara 

Santa Clara 

Shasta 

Solano 

Sonoma 

Stanislaus 

Su tter 

Tulare 

Ventura 

Ventura 

Ventura 

Ventura 

Yolo 

Adams 

Arapahoe 

Boulder 

Monitor 

Latitude 

39.33861 

33.83062 

33.63003 

38.74583 

39.93722 

39.80833 

33.94603 

33.70853 

33.99958 

38.61417 

38.55833 

38.55583 

34.03722 

34.51 

34.10002 

34.26444 

34.10688 

32.63123 

32.79119 

32.83646 

33.12771 

32.70149 

37.766 

37.95083 

35.25661 

35.49139 

37.4829 

34.42778 

37.3485 

37.3062 

40.54972 

38.1027 

38.4435 

37.64167 

39.13889 

36.33222 

34.21 

34.40461 

34.2775 

34.255 

38.66194 

39.82601 

39.6044 

40.16458 

Monitor 

Longitude 

-120.1703 

-1 17.9385 

-1 17.6759 

-121.2653 

-120.9378 

-120.4717 

-1 17.4006 

-116.2154 

-1 17.4160 

-121.3669 

-121.4919 

-121.4572 

-1 17.6900 

-117.3306 

-117.4920 

-1 16.8644 

-117.2741 

-117.0591 

-116.9421 

-117.1287 

-1 17.0753 

-117.1497 

-122.3991 

-121.2675 

-120.6689 

-120.6681 

-122.2034 

-1 19.6903 

-121.8950 

-121.8489 

-122.3792 

-122.2382 

-122.7100 

-1 20.9936 

-121.6175 

-1 19.2903 

-118.8694 

-1 18.8100 

-1 18.6847 

-119.1425 

-121.7278 

-104.9374 

-105.0195 

-105.1009 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2003-2007 

(uglm3) 

6.71 

15.75 

11.33 

9.8 

9.75 

11.46 

18.91 

10.31 

20.95 

11.88 

11.44 

10.53 

19.67 

10.29 

19.14 

10.77 

19.01 

11.92 

12.27 

10.59 

12.79 

13.38 

9.62 

12.94 

6.92 

7.94 

9.03 

10.37 

11.38 

10.32 

7.41 

9.99 

8.21 

14.21 

9.85 

18.51 

10.68 

9.74 

11.68 

10.69 

9.03 

10.06 

7.96 

8.32 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2003-2007 

(uglm3) 

7.06 

16.32 

11.9 

9.98 

9.75 

11.84 

20.45 

10.85 

22.6 

12.02 

11.57 

10.54 

21.15 

10.7 

20.28 

10.77 

20.45 

12.16 

12.82 

10.69 

13.45 

13.85 

9.87 

13.08 

7.02 

8.01 

9.22 

10.57 

11.7 

10.32 

7.72 

10.19 

8.34 

14.56 

10.25 

19.32 

11.25 

10.1 

12.63 

11.19 

9.37 

10.16 

8.1 

8.54 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2012 

(ugIm3) 

6.26 

14.73 

10.81 

9.31 

9.22 

10.75 

17.73 

9.85 

19.64 

11.28 

10.92 

10.04 

18.41 

9.58 

17.96 

10.25 

17.84 

11.61 

11.95 

10.31 

12.62 

13.04 

10.08 

12.52 

6.78 

7.63 

9.53 

10.26 

12.06 

10.42 

6.93 

9.97 

8.28 

13.22 

9.19 

16.75 

10.42 

9.38 

11.15 

10.34 

8.7 

9.63 

7.64 

7.91 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2012 

(uglm3) 

6.58 

15.26 

11.35 

9.48 

9.22 

11.1 

19.18 

10.37 

21.19 

11.42 

11.06 

10.04 

19.8 

9.96 

19.03 

10.25 

19.19 

11.84 

12.48 

10.42 

13.27 

13.5 

10.34 

12.66 

6.89 

7.7 

9.73 

10.46 

12.39 

10.42 

7.22 

10.17 

8.41 

13.54 

9.56 

17.48 

10.97 

9.71 

12.05 

10.82 

9.03 

9.73 

7.77 

8.13 

Modeling 

results 

from 

12km 

domain? 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 
Monitor ID 

80130012 

80290004 

80310002 

80310023 

80390001 

80410008 

80410011 

80690009 

80770017 

-- 81010012 

81 130004 

81230006 

- 81230008 

160010011 

- 160050015 

160090010 

160270004 

160410001 

160490003 

160790017 

300870307 

301111065 

300131026 

- 300290009 

300290047 

300310013 

300470013 

300470028 

300490018 

300530018 

300630031 

300810007 

300890007 

300930005 

320030022 

320030298 

320030561 

320031019 

- 320032002 

320310016 

350010023 

350010024 

350050005 

State 

Colorado 

Colorado 

Colorado 

Colorado 

Colorado 

Colorado 

Colorado 

Colorado 

Colorado 

Colorado 

Colorado 

Colorado 

Colorado 

ldaho 

ldaho 

ldaho 

idaho 

ldaho 

ldaho 

ldaho 

Montana 

Montana 

Montana 

Montana 

Montana 

Montana 

Montana 

Montana 

Montana 

Montana 

Montana 

Montana 

Montana 

Montana 

Nevada 

Nevada 

Nevada 

Nevada 

Nevada 

Nevada 

New 

Mexico 

New 

Mexico 

New 

Mexico 

County 

Boulder 

Deita 

Denver 

Denver 

Elbert 

El Paso 

El Paso 

Larimer 

Mesa 

Pueblo 

San Miguel 

Weld 

Weld 

Ada 

Bannock 

Benewah 

Canyon 

Franklin 

ldaho 

Shoshone 

Rosebud 

Yellowstone 

Cascade 

Flathead 

Flathead 

Gallatin 

Lake 

Lake 

Lewis and Cla 

Lincoln 

Missouia 

Ravalli 

Sanders 

Silver Bow 

:lark 

Slark 

Slark 

Slark 

Slark 

Nashoe 

3ernaliilo 

3ernalillo 

>haves 

Monitor 

Latitude 

40.021 1 

38.73921 

39.75118 

39.78108 

39.23138 

38.89598 

38.82804 

40.57129 

39.0638 

38.26306 

37.93787 

40.41488 

40.20939 

43.6361 1 

42.87673 

47.31667 

43.5624 

42.01333 

46.2094 

47.53639 

45.62333 

45.80194 

47.50222 

48.39972 

48.2025 

44.65778 

47.52694 

47.69222 

46.60389 

48.38417 

46.87491 

46.24552 

47.59639 

46.0024 

36.39078 

36.05222 

36.16399 

35.78563 

38.19111 

39.52508 

35.1343 

35.0631 

33.39694 

Monitor 

Longitude 

-1 05.2634 

-108.0731 

-104,9876 

-1 04.9567 

-104,6348 

-104.7613 

-104.8277 

-105.0797 

-108.5612 

-104.6121 

-107.8131 

-104.7069 

-104,8241 

-1 16.2703 

-1 12.4603 

-1 16.5703 

-1 16.5632 

-1 11.8092 

-1 16.0275 

-1 16.2367 

-1 06.6681 

-108.4261 

-1 11.2789 

-1 14.3336 

-114,3056 

-1 11.0908 

-114.1006 

-114.1622 

-1 12.0353 

-115.5481 

-113.9953 

-114.1598 

-1 15.3236 

-1 12.5009 

-1 14.9068 

-1 15.0569 

-115.1139 

-115.3571 

-115.1222 

-1 19.8077 

-106.5852 

-106.5788 

-104,5236 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2003-2007 

(uglm3) 

6.96 

7.44 

9.37 

9.76 

4.4 

6.73 

7.94 

7.33 

9.28 

7.45 

4.65 

8.19 

8.78 

8.41 

7.66 

9.59 

8.46 

7 7 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2003-2007 

(uglm3) 

7.06 

7.62 

9.74 

9.76 

4.54 

6.73 

8.11 

7.4 

9.48 

7.65 

4.81 

8.35 

9.28 

8.51 

7.74 

9.69 

8.64 

7.7 

9.58 

12.13 

6.58 

8.18 

5.8 

10.16 

8.55 

4.31 

9.06 

9 

8 

15.12 

10.27 

8.58 

6.85 

10.53 

4.07 

5.8 

9.44 

3.78 

8.79 

8.15 

7.13 

6.81 

6.58 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2012 

(uglm3) 

6.67 

6.97 

8.97 

9.34 

4.23 

6.34 

7.49 

7.02 

8.78 

7.08 

4.48 

7.73 

8.31 

8.09 

7.37 

9.37 

7.98 

7.24 

9.43 

11.77 

6.48 

7.89 

5.39 

9.49 

8.09 

4.17 

8.76 

8.7 

7.7 

14.31 

9.85 

8.33 

6.54 

9.5 

3.85 

5.46 

8.84 

3.51 

7.98 

7.59 

6.59 

6.22 

6.29 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2012 

(uglm3) 

6.77 

7.14 

9.32 

9.34 

4.37 

6.34 

7.65 

7.09 

8.97 

7.28 

4.64 

7.89 

8.77 

8.2 

7.45 

9.47 

8.15 

7.24 

9.43 

11.82 

6.48 

7.92 

5.61 

9.77 

8.18 

4.22 

8.76 

8.7 

7.76 

14.49 

9.9 

8.36 

6.7 

10.16 

3.91 

5.5 

8.84 

3.6 

8.26 

7.64 

6.68 

6.39 

6.33 

Modeling 

results 

from 

12km 

domain? 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 
Monitor ID 

350130017 

350130025 

350431003 

35043901 1 

350450006 

350490020 

- 350171002 

410290133 

410291001 

410350004 

410390060 

410391007 

410391009 

410392013 

410510080 

410510246 

410610119 

481410037 

-- 490030003 

490050004 

4901 10004 

490350003 

490351001 

490353006 

490353007 

490353008 

490490002 

490494001 

490495008 

490495010 

490570002 

490570007 

490571003 

530330024 

530330057 

530330080 

530530029 

53061 1007 

530630016 

560050877 

560050892 

State 

New 

Mexico 

New 

Mexico 

New 

Mexico 

New 

Mexico 

New 

Mexico - 

New 

Mexico 

New 

Mexico 

Oregon - 

Oregon 

Oregon - 

Oregon 

Oregon 

Oregon 

Oregon 

Oregon 

Oregon 

Oregon 

Texas 

Utah 

Utah 

Utah 

Utah 

Utah 

Utah 

Utah 

Ulah 

Utah 

Utah 

Utah 

Utah 

Utah 

Utah 

Utah 

Washington 

Washington 

Washington 

Washington 

Washington 

Washington 

Wyoming 

Wyoming 

county 

Dona Ana 

Dona Ana 

Sandoval 

Sandoval 

San Juan 

Santa Fe 

Grant 

Jackson 

Jackson 

Klamath 

Lane 

Lane 

Lane 

Lane 

Multnomah 

Multnomah 

Union 

El Paso 

Box Elder 

Cache 

Davis 

Salt Lake 

Salt Lake 

Salt Lake 

Salt Lake 

Salt Lake 

Utah 

Utah 

Utah 

Utah 

Weber 

Weber 

Weber 

King 

King 

King 

Pierce 

Snohornish 

Spokane 

Campbell 

Campbell 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2003-2007 

(ugim3) 

9.95 

6.31 

Monitor 

Latitude 

31.79583 

32.32194 

35.23806 

35.5064 

36.7275 

35.671 11 

32.78444 

42.31408 

42.5361 1 

42.18889 

44.02631 

43.8345 

44.0467 

43.74435 

45.49667 

45.5613 

45.33897 

31.76828 

41.49278 

41.731 11 

40.90297 

40.64667 

40.70861 

40.73639 

40.70444 

40.51795 

40.25361 

40.34139 

40.43028 

40.13639 

41.20639 

41.17972 

41.30368 

47.755 

47.5632 

47.56833 

47.1864 

48.05556 

47.66074 

43.67694 

44.09889 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2003-2007 

(uglm3) 

10.4 

6.35 

5.02 

8.34 

6.08 

4.81 

5.93 

10.66 

5.55 

11.37 

8.92 

6.35 

7.73 

12.37 

9.45 

8.57 

8.52 

9.09 

8.66 

12.22 

10.6 

11.94 

9.56 

11.62 

12.22 

8.68 

10.04 

10.73 

9.11 

8.91 

11.45 

9.54 

9.54 

9.27 

11.24 

8.13 

10.78 

10.35 

10.19 

6.29 

5.04 

Monitor 

Longitude 

-106.5575 

-106.7678 

-106.6494 

-106.7222 

-108.2208 

-105.9536 

-108.2717 

-122.8792 

-122.8750 

-121.7225 

-123.0837 

-123.0353 

-123.0177 

-122.4805 

-122.6022 

-122.6788 

-1 18.0945 

-106.5013 

-112.0181 

-1 11.8375 

-1 11.8845 

-1 11.8497 

-112.0947 

-1 11.8722 

-1 11.9686 

-112.0231 

-1 11.6631 

-1 11.7136 

-1 11.8039 

-111.6597 

-1 11.9747 

-111.9831 

-111.9871 

-122.2806 

-122.3405 

-122.3081 

-122.4517 

-122.1758 

-1 17.3581 

-105.2358 

-105.3428 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2012 

(ugim3) 

9.55 

6.03 

4.69 

7.74 

5.75 

4.59 

5.79 

9.94 

5.28 

10.69 

8.46 

6.23 

7.4 

11.6 

8.9 

8.14 

8.08 

8.73 

7.9 

10.86 

9.83 

10.93 

8.78 

10.73 

11.4 

7.86 

9.32 

9.8 

8.36 

8.18 

10.51 

8.73 

8.8 

9.06 

11.1 

8.04 

10.45 

9.77 

9.31 

6.16 

4.91 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2012 

(ugim3) 

9.97 

6.07 

4.71 

8.08 

5.91 

4.64 

5.79 

10.27 

5.42 

10.86 

8.74 

6.23 

7.57 

12.03 

9.21 

8.36 

8.24 

8.73 

8.13 

11.48 

10.11 

11.17 

9.11 

11.03 

11.63 

8.19 

9.35 

9.99 

8.57 

8.31 

10.77 

8.98 

8.97 

9.17 

11.1 

8.04 

10.68 

10.21 

9.52 

6.16 

4.95 

Modeling 

results 

from 

12km 

domain? 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 
Monitor ID 

560050899 

560090819 

560131003 

560210001 

560330002 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2003-2007 

(uglm3) 

5.37 

3.52 

8.17 

4.48 

9.7 

State 

Wyoming 

Wyoming 

Wyoming 

Wyoming 

Wyoming 

Value Value 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2012 

(uglm3) 

5.37 

3.48 

8.21 

4.48 

9.54 

Monitor Monitor 

Modeling 

results 

from 

12km 

domain? 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Campbell 

Converse 

Fremont 

Laramie 

Sheridan 

44.46597 

43.42667 

42.84105 

41.13998 

44.83327 

-105.5517 

-105.3858 

-108.7363 

-104.8178 

-106.9646 
Appendix B 

Base year 2003-2007 and Future Year 2012 8-Hour Average Ozone 

Design Values- Western States 
Monitor ID 

40070010 

40130019 

40131004 

40131010 

.- 40132001 

40132005 

40133002 

40133003 

40134003 

-. 401 34004 

40134005 

40134008 

40134010 

4013401 1 

40137003 

40137020 

40137021 

40139508 

40139702 

40139704 

40139706 

40139997 

-- 40213001 

40213003 

- 4021 3009 

40213010 

40217001 

- 40218001 

60010007 

60050002 

60070002 

60070007 

60090001 

60111002 

60130002 

60131002 

60133001 

60170010 

60170020 

60190007 
Monitor ID 

60190008 

60190242 

60194001 

60195001 

60210002 

60250004 

60250005 

60250006 

60251003 

60254003 

60254004 

60290007 

60290008 

60290010 

6029001 1 

60290014 

60290232 

60295001 

60296001 

6031 1004 

60370002 

60370016 

603701 13 

60371002 

60371 103 

60371201 

60371701 

60372005 

60376012 

60379033 

60390004 

60430006 

60470003 

60531003 

60570005 

60570007 

60591003 

60592022 

60610002 

60610004 

60610006 

60650012 

60652002 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2003- 

2007 

(PP~) 

98.3 

96.3 

93.7 

91.3 

65.5 

70 

74.7 

76.7 

85 

83.7 

73 

98.7 

89.3 

88 

87 

97.7 

95.7 

110 

89 

85.7 

91.7 

102 

73.7 

89 

74 

101.7 

100.3 

91.3 

114 

96.3 

79.3 

83.7 

89.3 

55.7 

96.3 

65 

68 

84.3 

91.3 

94 

88 

112.3 

91 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2012 

(PP~) 

89.5 

88.6 

87.3 

84.1 

63 

65.8 

72.2 

72.2 

78.6 

79.7 

67.7 

89.1 

80.7 

80.2 

80.1 

88.2 

85.6 

98.3 

81.1 

79.1 

91.1 

101.7 

74.9 

86.3 

73.7 

101.9 

105.1 

90.2 

108.5 

89.8 

74.2 

79.2 

86 

54.9 

90.3 

79.2 

71 

81.5 

85.7 

89.4 

83.3 

106.9 

86.1 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2003-2007 

(PP~) 

99 

98 

96 

93 

67 

72 

79 

79 

86 

87 

74 

100 

91 

90 

90 

99 

96 

113 

90 

88 

94 

105 

78 

89 

76 

106 

102 

93 

120 

98 

82 

87 

95 

58 

98 

86 

73 

86 

93 

97 

89 

119 

95 

Modeling 

results 

from 

12km 

domain? 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2012 

(PP~) 

88.9 

87.1 

85.2 

82.6 

61.5 

64 

68.3 

70.1 

77.7 

76.6 

66.8 

88 

79.2 

78.4 

77.5 

87.1 

85.3 

95.7 

80.2 

77 

88.8 

98.8 

70.8 

86.3 

71.7 

97.7 

103.3 

88.5 

103.1 

88.2 

71.7 

76.2 

80.8 

52.7 

88.7 

78.3 

66.1 

79.9 

84.2 

86.7 

82.3 

100.9 

82.4 
Monitor Monitor 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2003- 

2007 

(PP~) 

102.3 

98.3 

108.7 

101 

62.3 

80.7 

90.7 

75.7 

82.3 

97.3 

76 

94.3 

68 

75 

84.7 

123.3 

98 

85 

91.7 

106.3 

80.7 

114.3 

100.7 

119.3 

103.7 

115.7 

66.7 

71.7 

72.3 

69 

73.3 

87.7 

73 

59.3 

63 

75.3 

62.3 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2003-2007 

(PP~) 

104 

100 

112 

104 

63 

82 

92 

78 

83 

98 

76 

96 

68 

76 

85 

127 

100 

85 

94 

108 

83 

118 

104 

123 

105 

116 

68 

73 

74 

70 

74 

89 

76 

61 

65 

77 

67 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2012 

(PP~) 

92.1 

90.3 

109.4 

92.8 

57 

75.5 

84.9 

71.2 

78.8 

91 

71.5 

88.2 

64.3 

71.1 

76.7 

116.7 

92.7 

77.1 

86.8 

109.5 

72.2 

115 

95.3 

120 

93.8 

116.4 

64.3 

69.1 

69.7 

66.9 

68.3 

81.2 

69.1 

57.2 

60.8 

71.7 

58.7 

Maximum Modeling 

Design results 

Value from 

2012 12km 

(PP~) domain? 

93.7 

91.9 

112.7 

95.6 

57.6 

76.7 

86.1 

73.3 

79.4 

91.7 

71.5 

89.8 

64.3 

721 

77 
Monitor ID 

6083001 1 

60831014 

60831021 

60831025 

6083201 1 

60833001 

60850002 

60851001 

60852005 

60852006 

60870006 

60870007 

60890004 

60890007 

60950005 

60953003 

60990005 

60990006 

61010003 

61010004 

61030004 

61070006 

61070009 

- 61072002 

61090005 

611 10007 

611 10009 

61111004 

61 112002 

61112003 

61113001 

61 130004 

61131003 

80013001 

80050002 

8013001 1 

80310002 

80310014 

80350004 

80590002 

80590005 

80590006 

8059001 1 

Monitor Monitor 

Latitude Longitude 

34.4278 -1 19.6903 

34.5417 -119.7915 

34.4028 -1 19.4575 

34.4897 -120.0469 

34.4455 -1 19.8284 

34.6084 -120.0747 

37.0000 -121.5744 

37.2269 -121.9786 

37.4019 -121.8425 

37.0794 -121.5992 

37.0522 -122.0125 

36.9840 -121.9883 

40.5497 -122.3792 

40.4531 -122.2978 

38.2269 -122.0758 

38.3584 -121.9500 

37.6417 -120.9936 

37.4883 -120.8358 

39.1389 -121.6175 

39.2056 -121.8204 

40.2622 -122.0928 

State 

Zalifornia 

Zalifornia 

Zaiifornia 

Zaiifornia 

Zaiifornia 

Zaiifornia 

2aiifornia 

Zaiifornia 

:alifornia 

Zalifornia 

Zalifornia 

Zalifornia 

:alifornia 

Zalifornia 

Zalifornia 

Zalifornia 

zalifornia 

Zalifornia 

Zalifornia 

:alifornia 

Zalifornia 

:alifornia 

:alifornia 

Zalifornia 

:alifornia 

Zaiifornia 

:aiifornia 

Zaiifornia 

:alifornia 

:alifornia 

:alifornia 

:alifornia 

:alifornia 

:olorado 

Zolorado 

Zolorado 

Zolorado 

:olorado 

:olorado 

Zolorado 

:oiorado 

Zoiorado 

:oiorado 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2003- 

2007 

(PP~) 

60.5 

76 

60.7 

73.3 

62.7 

65.3 

70.3 

71 

59 

75.3 

61.3 

54.7 

78 

79.3 

67.7 

72.7 

84.7 

84.7 

74 

82 

82.7 

96 

103.7 

92 

80 

79 

84 

88.3 

89.7 

65 

63 

74 

78.7 

69 

78.7 

77 

56 

73 

83 

76.3 

70.3 

81.7 

80.7 

County 

Santa Barbar; 

Santa Barbar; 

Santa Barbar; 

Santa Barbar; 

Santa Barbar; 

Santa Barbar; 

Santa Clara 

Santa Clara 

Santa Clara 

Santa Clara 

Santa Cruz 

Santa Cruz 

Shasta 

Shasta 

Solano 

Solano 

Stanislaus 

Stanislaus 

Sutter 

Sutter 

Tehama 

Tulare 

Tulare 

Tulare 

Tuolumne 

Ventura 

Ventura 

Ventura 

Ventura 

Ventura 

Ventura 

Yolo 

Yoio 

Adarns 

Arapahoe 

Boulder 

Denver 

Denver 

Douglas 

Jefferson 

Jefferson 

Jefferson 

Jefferson 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2003-2007 

(PP~) 

62 

78 

64 

74 

64 

68 

71 

73 

59 

76 

63 

57 

80 

84 

69 

74 

86 

86 

74 

83 

83 

97 

105 

93 

81 

83 

87 

90 

91 

68 

66 

75 

80 

70 

81 

81 

56 

75 

84 

79 

75 

85 

82 

Average 

Design 

Value 

0 

2012 

57 

71.6 

56.7 

69.1 

59.1 

61.5 

66.5 

68.5 

56.9 

72.2 

59.2 

52.8 

70.9 

72.1 

65.5 

68.1 

78.5 

77.7 

68.4 

77.1 

75.6 

87.3 

94.3 

82.9 

74.8 

77.1 

75.9 

80.1 

86.2 

60.7 

57.1 

69.6 

74 

66.8 

76 

73.4 

54.2 

70.7 

79.3 

73.9 

67.9 

78.1 

78.2 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2012 

(PP~) 

58.4 

73.5 

59.8 

69.7 

60.3 

64.1 

67.2 

70.5 

56.9 

72.8 

60.8 

55 

72.7 

76.4 

66.7 

69.4 

79.7 

78.9 

68.4 

78 

75.9 

88.2 

95.5 

83.8 

75.8 

81 

78.6 

81.7 

87.4 

63.6 

59.9 

70.5 

75.2 

67.7 

78.2 

77.2 

54.2 

72.6 

80.3 

76.6 

72.4 

81.3 

79.5 

Modeling 

results 

from 

12km 

domain? 

yes 

yes 

yes 

yes 

yes 

yes 

yes 

yes 

yes 

yes 
Monitor ID 

80691004 

81230009 

80410013 

80410016 

80690007 

320030007 

320030020 

320030022 

320030043 

320030071 

320030072 

320030073 

320030075 

320030538 

320030601 

320031019 

320031 021 

320032002 

350130008 

350130017 

350130021 

350130022 

350450009 

350451 005 

350010019 

350010023 

350010024 

350010027 

350011013 

35001 1014 

350431003 

350450009 

350451005 

490030003 

4901 10004 

490350003 

490352004 

490353006 

490353007 

490353008 

490450003 

490490002 

490495008 

Average 

Design Maximum 

Value Design 

2003- Value 

2007 2003-2007 

(PPW (PP~) 

72.3 74 

76.7 78 

73.3 74 

73 74 

76 78 

76 77 

78.7 79 

78 79 

80.3 82 

83.7 86 

83.3 84 

82.7 83 

83.7 85 

77.7 78 

76 76 

80.7 81 

75.3 78 

79.7 81 

70.7 72 

71.3 72 

75.3 77 

72.7 74 

69.7 72 

71.3 72 

72.3 73 

71 71 

72.3 73 

71.7 72 

73.7 75 

70.3 71 

73.3 74 

69.7 72 

71.3 72 

76 78 

81.3 85 

81 83 

State 

Zolorado 

Zolorado 

Zoiorado 

Zolorado 

Zolorado 

Uevada 

Uevada 

Uevada 

Uevada 

Uevada 

Uevada 

Uevada 

Uevada 

Uevada 

Uevada 

Uevada 

'ievada 

Uevada 

'iew Mexico 

'iew Mexico 

'iew Mexico 

Uew Mexico 

Uew Mexico 

Uew Mexico 

Uew Mexico 

Uew Mexico 

Uew Mexico 

qew Mexico 

qew Mexico 

qew Mexico 

qew Mexico 

qew Mexico 

qew Mexico 

Jtah 

Jtah 

Jtah 

Jtah 

Jtah 

Jtah 

Jtah 

Jtah 

Jtah 

Jtah 

Average 

Design 

Value 

0 

2012 

68.4 

72.7 

68.8 

68.5 

71.3 

68.6 

71 

70.6 

72.1 

75.2 

74.8 

74.3 

75.8 

70.1 

66.8 

71.8 

68 

72 

66.9 

67.3 

71 

68.5 

66.4 

68.1 

66.1 

65 

66.1 

65.6 

67.4 

64.3 

67.1 

66.1 

67.7 

70.1 

74.6 

74.9 

75 

71.9 

72.5 

72.1 

72.6 

68.7 

70.3 

County 

Larimer 

Weld 

El Paso 

El Paso 

Larimer 

Clark 

Clark 

Clark 

Clark 

Clark 

Clark 

Clark 

Clark 

Clark 

Clark 

Clark 

Clark 

Clark 

Dona Ana 

Dona Ana 

Dona Ana 

Dona Ana 

San Juan 

San Juan 

Bernalillo 

Bernalillo 

Bernalillo 

Bernalillo 

Bernalillo 

Bernalillo 

Sandoval 

San Juan 

San Juan 

BOX Elder 

Davis 

Salt Lake 

Salt Lake 

Salt Lake 

Salt Lake 

Salt Lake 

Tooele 

Utah 

Utah 

Monitor 

Latitude 

40.5775 

40.3864 

38.9583 

38.8531 

40.2772 

36.0289 

36.2453 

36.3908 

36.1081 

36.1703 

36.2247 

36.1731 

36.2724 

36.1431 

35.9789 

35.7856 

36.1205 

36.1911 

31.9306 

31.7958 

31.7961 

31.7878 

36.7422 

36.7967 

35.1073 

35.1343 

35.0631 

35.1539 

35.1932 

35.2022 

35.2381 

36.7422 

36.7967 

41.4928 

40.9030 

40.6467 

40.7364 

40.7364 

40.7044 

40.5179 

40.5434 

40.2536 

40.4303 

Monitor 

Longitude 

-105.0789 

-104.7374 

-104.8172 

-104.9013 

-105.5450 

-1 14.9889 

-1 15.0922 

-114.9068 

-115.2536 

-115.2614 

-115.2667 

-115.3317 

-1 15.2382 

-115.0517 

-1 14.8442 

-1 15.3571 

-115.1300 

-115.1222 

-106.6306 

-106.5575 

-106.5839 

-106.6828 

-107.9769 

-108.4725 

-106.5636 

-106.5852 

-106.5788 

-106.6972 

-106.6138 

' -106.6493 

-106.6494 

-107.9769 

-108.4725 

-112.0181 

-1 11.8845 

-1 11.8497 

-112.2103 

-1 11.8722 

-111.9686 

-112.0231 

-1 12.2988 

-1 11.6631 

-1 11.8039 
Count 

490570007 Utah Weber 1 41.1797 / -111.9831 

490571003 Utah / Weber 41.3037 / -111.9871 

Average 

Design Maximum Average 

Value Design Design 

2003- Value Value 

2007 2003-2007 2012 

(PP~) (PP~) (PP~) 

76.7 78 70.9 

78.3 81 71.7 

80.3 83 73.5 

Value 

domain? 
Appendix C 

Base year 2003-2007 %Hour Average Ozone Design ValuesWestern State Monitors Where a Future Year Design Value Could Not Be 

Calculated 
Average 

Design Maximum 

Value Design Average Maximum 

2003- Value Design Design 

Monitor Monitor 2007 2003-2007 Value Value 

Monitor ID State County Latitude Longitude (ppb) 
Monitor 

County Latitude 

San Mateo 37.4829 

Santa Barbara 34.9492 

Santa Barbara 34.7256 

Santa Barbara 34.5274 

Santa Barbara 34.6378 

Santa Barbara 34.5961 

Santa Clara 37.3485 

Sanla Clara 37.3553 

Santa Cruz 37.0119 

Santa Cruz 36.9333 

Shasta 40.5369 

Siskiyou 41.7283 

Solano 38.1027 

Sonoma 38.4435 

.a Plata 37.1022 

Uontezuma 37.1983 

4da 43.5895 

;anyon 43.7056 

flmore 43.2866 

<oolenai 47.7889 

-lathead 48.5103 

,'ellowstone 45.9426 

:lark 36.8081 

Uashoe 39.5251 

Uashoe 39.4696 

Uashoe 39.4000 

Uashoe 39.5405 

Nashoe 39.2506 

Nashoe 39.6455 

Nhite Plne 39.0053 

:arson City 39.1731 

3ernalillo 35.0171 

3ernalillo 35.1852 

lona Ana 31.9306 

Jona Ana 31.7958 

Jona Ana 32.0411 

Jona Ana 31.7961 

lona Ana 31.7878 

lona Ana 32.3175 

idd 32.3800 

;rant 32.6919 

32.7267 

jandoval 35.2994 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2003-2007 

(PP~) 

57 

53 

70 

60 

56 

69 

63 

64 

52 

56 

72 

64 

60 

49 

66 

73 

77 

66 

63 

67 

57 

59 

71 

71 

71 

69 

71 

65 

71 

73 

66 

69 

77 

72 

72 

72 

77 

74 

67 

69 

66 

71 

70 

Monitor 

Longitude 

-122.2034 

-120.4367 

-120.4278 

-120.1965 

-120.4575 

-120.6303 

-121.8950 

-122.0514 

-122.1933 

-121.7958 

-121.5725 

-122.6344 

-122.2382 

-122.7100 

-107.8694 

-108.4903 

-1 16.2235 

-1 16.6232 

-1 15.8532 

-1 16.8045 

-1 13.9956 

-108.3510 

-1 14.0608 

-1 19.8077 

-1 19.7753 

-1 19.7396 

-119.7469 

-119.9564 

-119.8399 

-114.2158 

-1 19.7592 

-106.6574 

-1 06.5082 

-106.6306 

-106.5575 

-106.4092 

-106.5839 

-106.6828 

-106.7678 

-104.2622 

-108.1244 

-103.1229 

-106.5483 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2012 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

Average 

Design 

Value 

2003- 

2007 

(ppb) 

53.7 

50.7 

66.3 

56.7 

54 

65.3 

61.7 

59 

51 

54.7 

69.7 

63.5 

57 

47.7 

63.7 

72 

76 

66 

63 

67 

56.3 

59 

70 

70 

70.7 

67.3 

70.7 

65 

67.7 

72.3 

65 

69 

69.3 

70.7 

71.3 

70.7 

75.3 

72.7 

66.5 

69 

66 

69.5 

67.7 

Maximum 

Design 

Value 

2012 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 

-9 
Average 

Design Maximum 

Value Design Average Maximum