### Name: Al Scobee

Title: Power Plant Superintendent Company: City of Hamilton Sign Date: 9/7/2010 Name: Carl Vineyard Title: Utility MACT Program Manager Company: Grace Consulting, Inc. Sign Date: 9/7/2010 Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date 

## City of Hamilton, Unit 9 Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Thursday, January 27, 2011 Page 1 of 13

### City of Hamilton, Unit 9

9/7/2010 Facility Information: City of Hamilton
960 North Third Street

Hamilton OH 45011
Contact: Al Scobee
Phone: 513-785-7450
Fax: 513-867-7343
Email: scobeea@ci.hamilton.oh.us Testing Company: Grace Consulting, Inc.

510 Dickson Street

Wellington OH 44090
Contact: Carl Vineyard
Phone: 440-647-6672
Fax: 440-647-6673
Email: carlvineyard@gcitest.com

Air Permit Number:
110000392110 Permitted Source ID/Name: City of Hamilton, Unit 9 2917
Permitted Maximum Process Rate: 729 mmBtu/hr (50 MW Unit) Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:
400 mmBtu/hr Target Process Test Rate 475 mmBtu/hr

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram: Unit 9 (Combustion Engineering Coal-Fired Boiler #9): Pulverized, dry bottom coal-fired boiler (tangential, bituminous coal), having a rated heat input capacity of 729 MMBtu/hr and controlled with a lime injection/dry scrubber system, baghouse and electrostatic precipitator. See attached process flow diagram. Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #: 3901700011 FRS #: 110000392110

SCC / Description 10100212 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal - Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Tangential) (Bituminous Coal)

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width
Unit 9 Stack 123.6 360 720 4 12

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 180 0 Refer to "Run Data Details-Point Data" tab in the ERT for "Sample Points" information. Unit 9 Stack Regulation Description Compound Limit Unit
Section 114 Clean Air Act HAPS.



### Thursday, January 27, 2011 Page 2 of 13

### City of Hamilton, Unit 9

9/7/2010

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates. The HCN was sampled using CTM 033 with 2 Normal NaOH and an additional impinger for one hour per the clarification given by the USEPA.

Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 180 0 Refer to "Run Data Details-Point Data" tab in the ERT for "Sample Points" information. Unit 9 Stack

O2 Method 3A O2 3 180 0 Refer to "Run Data Details-Point Data" tab in the ERT for "Sample Points" information. Unit 9 Stack

Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 180 0 Refer to "Run Data Details-Point Data" tab in the ERT for "Sample Points" information. Unit 9 Stack

Sulfur Dioxide Method 6C 3 180 0 Refer to "Run Data Details-Point Data" tab in the ERT for "Sample Points" information. Unit 9 Stack

Nitrogen oxides (NOx) Method 7E 3 180 0 Refer to "Run Data Details-Point Data" tab in the ERT for "Sample Points" information. Unit 9 Stack



### Thursday, January 27, 2011 Page 3 of 13

### City of Hamilton, Unit 9

9/7/2010 Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary



### Location Unit 9 Stack - Method 26A Average
Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 5/26/2010 5/26/2010 5/26/2010
Run Start Time 7:05:00 AM 11:34:00 AM 3:17:00 PM

Run Finish Time 10:22:00 AM 2:56:00 PM 6:33:00 PM Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 111.553 122.319 100.634 111.502 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 8.26 7.59 9.37 8.407 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 57.61 59.20 57.64 58.150 Carbon Dioxide, % 11.9 12.2 12.4 12.167 Oxygen, % 8.9 8.5 8.8 8.733 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 184.94 186.19 184.97 185.367 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 147,321.5 146,358.7 134,472.7 142,717.633 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 198,675.4 196,325.7 183,577.2 192,859.433 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 98.1 108.2 96.9 101.067 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9667 9451 9442 9,520.000
Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000



### Location Unit 9 Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average
Run Number

Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Thursday, January 27, 2011 Page 4 of 13

### City of Hamilton, Unit 9

9/7/2010

Location Unit 9 Stack - Method 3A O2 Average
Run Number

Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Location Unit 9 Stack - Method 6C Average
Run Number

Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Thursday, January 27, 2011 Page 5 of 13

### City of Hamilton, Unit 9

9/7/2010

Location Unit 9 Stack - Method 7E Average
Run Number

Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Thursday, January 27, 2011 Page 6 of 13

### City of Hamilton, Unit 9

9/7/2010 Emissions Summary

Process Run Data 

### Location: Unit 9 Stack - Method 26A Compound: Hydrogen Chloride Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.308 0.446 0.28 0.345 lb/mmBtuO2 1.02E-04 1.28E-04 1.00E-04 0.000


### Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.337 lb/mmBtuO2 1.10E-04 9.76E-05 1.21E-04 0.000



### Location: Unit 9 Stack - Method 6C Compound: Sulfur Dioxide Average Run 1 2 3 lb/mmBtuO2 9.90E-01 8.78E-01 9.39E-01 0.936
ppm 3.54E+02 3.31E+02 3.46E+02 343.667 ppm@7%O2 4.10E+02 3.71E+02 3.97E+02 392.667



### Location: Unit 9 Stack - Method 7E Compound: Nitrogen oxides (NOx) Average Run 1 2 3 lb/mmBtuO2 3.10E-01 3.20E-01 3.25E-01 0.318
ppm 1.54E+02 1.68E+02 1.67E+02 163.000 ppm@7%O2 1.78E+02 1.88E+02 1.92E+02 186.000



### Thursday, January 27, 2011 Page 7 of 13

### City of Hamilton, Unit 9

9/7/2010
Process Run Data

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data 

### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 Heat Input 482.9 Million Btus/hr 475



### 1 Steam Flow 425.7 Klb/hr 400

1 MW 50.5 MW 45

2 Heat Input 486.9 Million Btus/hr 475



### 2 Steam Flow 425.7 Klb/hr 400

2 MW 50.3 MW 45

3 Heat Input 481.5 Million Btus/hr 475



### 3 Steam Flow 425.7 Klb/hr 400

3 MW 50.1 MW 45



### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 LOW NOX BURNERS



### 1 OVERFIRE AIR

1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR



### 1 FLUID BED DRY SCRUBBER

1 BAGHOUSE

1



### Thursday, January 27, 2011 Page 8 of 13

### City of Hamilton, Unit 9

9/7/2010
Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail



### Location Unit 9 Stack - Method 26A Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 5/26/2010 5/26/2010 5/26/2010 Run Start Time 7:05:00 AM 11:34:00 AM 3:17:00 PM Run Finish Time 10:22:00 AM 2:56:00 PM 6:33:00 PM Net Traversing Points 36 36 36 Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.001 1.001 1.001 1.001 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.56 29.56 29.56 29.560 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.50 2.24 1.26 1.667 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 119.143 133.625 110.913 121.227 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 99.78 113.61 117.31 110.233 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 111.553 122.319 100.634 111.502 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 213.3 213.3 221.1 215.900 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 10.04 10.04 10.41 10.163 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 8.26 7.59 9.37 8.407 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 57.61 59.20 57.64 58.150 Dry Mole Fraction 0.9174 0.9241 0.9063 0.916 Carbon Dioxide, % 11.9 12.2 12.4 12.167 Oxygen, % 8.9 8.5 8.8 8.733 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.2 79.3 78.8 79.100 Fuel Factor 1.01 1.02 0.98 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.26 30.29 30.34 30.297 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.25 29.36 29.18 29.263 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.300 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.54 29.54 29.54 29.540 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 184.94 186.19 184.97 185.367 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.4103236947 23213 0.401318308

683315 0.349431883

161815 0.387

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 39.74 39.27 36.72 38.577 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 83.323 83.323 83.323 83.323 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 147,321.5 146,358.7 134,472.7 142,717.633 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 198,675.4 196,325.7 183,577.2 192,859.433 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 98.1 108.2 96.9 101.067 Percent Excess Air, % 74.1 68.4 73.3 71.933 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9667 9451 9442 9,520.000 Round Duct Diameter, inches 123.6 123.6 123.6 Rectangular Duct Width, inches Rectangular Duct Length, inches Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000



### Thursday, January 27, 2011 Page 9 of 13

### City of Hamilton, Unit 9

9/7/2010

Location Unit 9 Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Thursday, January 27, 2011 Page 10 of 13

### City of Hamilton, Unit 9

9/7/2010

Location Unit 9 Stack - Method 3A O2 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Thursday, January 27, 2011 Page 11 of 13

### City of Hamilton, Unit 9

9/7/2010

Location Unit 9 Stack - Method 6C Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Thursday, January 27, 2011 Page 12 of 13

### City of Hamilton, Unit 9

9/7/2010

Location Unit 9 Stack - Method 7E Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Thursday, January 27, 2011 Page 13 of 13