alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tektronix, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 29, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Colin L. Slade, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: January 9, 2004


/s/  COLIN L. SLADE
-------------------------------------------------
Colin L. Slade
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, John F. Burke, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-K"), fully complies with requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date: April 15, 2003
                                        /s/ John F. Burke
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        John F. Burke,
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7242

MAURICE MCCAIN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

CHIEF WARDEN GARRITY, Greensville Federal

Corrections Facility,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-02-435)

Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 20, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joan Augusta Harvill, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

 Because McCain was convicted in a District of Columbia

court, he is required to obtain a certificate of appealability in

order to proceed with this § 2241 petition. See Modley v. United

States Parole Comm’n, 278 F.3d 1306 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 123

S. Ct. 515 (2002).

2

PER CURIAM:

Maurice McCain, a District of Columbia prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition

filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). An appeal may not be taken

from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.* 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a

§ 2241 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of

appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate

both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether

the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional

right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable

whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’”

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 318

(2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons

stated by the district court that McCain has not made the requisite

showing. See McCain v. Garrity, No. CA-02-435 (E.D. Va. July 16,

2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. In addition, we grant McCain’s counsel’s motion
3

to withdraw. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[LOGO] BANK OF AMERICA                                    AMENDMENT TO DOCUMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                      AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT

     This Amendment No. 1 (the "Amendment") dated as of November 4, 1997, is
between Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association (the "Bank") and
Tab Products Co. (the "Borrower").

                                       RECITALS

     A.   The Bank and the Borrower entered into a certain Business Loan 
Agreement dated as of August 26, 1996 (the "Agreement").

     B.   The Bank and the Borrower desire to amend the Agreement.


                                      AGREEMENT

     1.   DEFINITIONS.   Capitalized terms used but not defined in this
Amendment shall have the meaning given to them in the Agreement.

     2.   AMENDMENTS.  The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

          2.1  In Paragraph 7.10, the amount "Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000)"
is substituted for the amount "Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars
($3,500,000)."

     3.   EFFECT OF AMENDMENT.   Except as provided in this Amendment, all of 
the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and 
effect.

          This Amendment is executed as of the date stated at the beginning of
this Amendment.



BANK OF AMERICA
NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION
                                             TAB PRODUCTS CO.


X   /s/  C.P. Giannotti
  ------------------------------------
By: Chris P. Giannotti, Vice President        X   R.J. Sexton
                                                -------------------------------
                                              By: TREASURER



                                              X   John M. Palmer
                                                -------------------------------

                                              By: VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                     -1-
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHN DAVID POSTA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-852

[April 1, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael A. Usan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 18-7014CF10A.

Fred Haddad of Fred Haddad, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. Hernandez, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
D-6.i

APPENDIX D-6. METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE INPUT ENERGY

CONSUMPTION OF SIDE ARM GAS STORAGE WATER HEATER DESIGNS
D-6.1

in

p in amb

on

Q amb

vol dens CT T

RE

UA T T

P = UA T T ⋅ ⋅⋅ − ⋅ −

 ⋅ −



 



 +⋅ ⋅ −

() ( ( ) tank tank 1 24 tank

Qout = ⋅⋅ − M CT T p in ( ) tank

in

out out amb

on

Q amb

Q

RE

Q UA T T

RE P = − UA T T ⋅⋅ −

⋅ +⋅ ⋅ −

( ) ( ) tank 24 tank

APPENDIX D-6. METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE INPUT ENERGY

CONSUMPTION OF SIDE ARM GAS STORAGE WATER HEATER DESIGNS

Because the TANK simulation model cannot simulate the performance of water heaters

equipped with side arm heaters, the WHAM energy calculation method was used to estimate its

energy performance.1

 If both the energy factor and recovery efficiency are known, WHAM can

determine the UA of the water heater and, in turn, its energy consumption. According to the WHAM

energy calculation method, the equation for determining the average daily energy input is as follows:

where;

Qin = average daily energy input,

RE = recovery efficiency from test procedure,

UA = standby heat loss coefficient from test procedure,

Pon = rated input,

vol = average volume of water drawn in 24 hr,5

dens = density of water,

Cp = specific heat of water,

Ttank = tank thermostat set point,

Tin = inlet water temperature, and

Tamb = ambient air temperature surrounding the water heater

Because the energy output (the energy delivered to the water) can be expressed as

where;

Qout = daily energy output, and

M = vol # dens,

the daily energy input can be expressed as follows:
D-6.2

UA

P

RE

EF

RE P

on

on

=

⋅ −





 





⋅ ⋅⋅ −





 





1

67 5

24

41094 . 1

EF

RE P

P UA RE P

on

on on

= ⋅

+⋅ ⋅ ⋅⋅ −





 



 67 5

24

41094 . 1

The energy factor (EF) is the ratio of the energy output (Qout) to the energy input (Qin). Thus,

using the above expression for Qin, as well as DOE test procedure values of 135(F (57.2(C), 67.5(F

(19.7(C), and 41094 Btu (43356 kJ) for Ttank, Tamb, and Qout, the energy factor can be expressed with

the following equation:

Solving the above expression for UA yields the following equation:

Thus, knowing EF and RE and assuming DOE test procedure values for Ttank, Tamb, and Qout,

the UA can be determined. With UA established, the daily energy input, Qin, can be calculated. This

was the procedure used for establishing the total daily energy input for water heaters equipped with

side arm heaters. 
D-6.3

REFERENCE

1. Lutz, J., C. D. Whitehead, A. Lekov, D. Winiarski, and G. Rosenquist, WHAM: A

Simplified Energy Consumption Equation for Water Heaters. In 1998 ACEEE Summer Study

on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. 1998. Asilomar, CA, August 23-28, 1998: American

Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. 1: p. 1.171-1.183.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Drew A. Moyer, Principal Financial Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 26, 2009 (the “Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and





(2)
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Technitrol, Inc.





Dated:  August 5, 2009
/s/ Drew A. MoyerDrew A. Moyer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be retained by Technitrol, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Schedule re Change of Control Agreements



 Exhibit 10.2 
 CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENTS 
 C.R. Dwiggins, Jr. 
 Russell N. Fairbanks, Jr. 
 David C. Godwin 
 Steven M.
Helmbrecht 
 Philip E. Mezey 
 Randi L. Neilson 
 Robert D. Neilson 
 LeRoy D. Nosbaum 
 Jemima G. Scarpelli 
 Douglas L. Staker
 Malcolm Unsworth 
 Russell E. Vanos 
 Robert W. Whitney
Alabama DepartmentofEnvironmentalManagementadem.alabama.gov1400ColiseumBlvd.36110-2400PostOfficeBox301463Montgomery,Alabama36130-1463(334)271-7700FAX(334)271-7950July31,2010Mr.A.Stanley MeiburgRegional AdministratorU.S.EPA,Region4AtlantaFederalCenter61ForsythStreet,S.W.Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960DearMr.Meiburg:On May 13,2010,theU.S.Environmental ProtectionAgency(EPA)issuedthe greenhouse gas(GHG)tailoringrule, whichaddresses greenhouse gas emissionsfromstationarysources underthe CleanAir Act(CAA)permittingprograms.Thepurpose ofthisletteristoprovidetheinformation forAlabamarequestedby EPAinthepreambleforthefinaltailoringrule.ADEMhasstatutory andadministrativeauthoritytoregulateGlIGemissionsinitsPSI)andTitleVpermittingprogramswhenGl-iGemissions became designatedasregulated pollutants undertheCAA.Norevisionsneedtobemadetoregulationsforthispurpose.However,ourPSD regulationswill needtoberevisedtobeconsistentwithEPA'stailoringrulethresholds.Inordertoaccomplishthis, weplantobeginthe rulemakingprocess by August22,2010.Therevised rules shouldbeconsideredfor adoptionbytheEnvironmentalManagement Commission(EMC)intheDecembertimeframe.IftheEMCadoptsthe proposed rule revisionsinDecember,thefinalruleswill besubmittedtoEPAinJanuary2011.We haverequested,andour understandingisthat EPAhas agreedtoparallelprocessingfor thisSIPrevisionsothatthe revisionscanbecomeeffectiveinthe AlabamaSIPatthesame timetheyare effectiveinour stateregulations.WealsointendtoreviseourTitleVregulationsinaseparate rulemakingactionata laterdate.WethankEPAforprovidingcommentsondraft revisions to our PSDregulations.Ourunderstandingisthatifweresolve thesecomments,therewill be noobstacles tofinalEPAapproval ofthisSIPrevision.Shouldyourequire additional information, please contactmeat(334)271-7868.Sincerely,RonaldW.Gore,ChiefAir Divisioncc:Beverly Banister, EPACarolL.Kemker,EPABlnnlngharn&an&DecaturBranch110Vulcan Road2715SandlinRoad,S.W.Birmingham,AL352044702Decatur.AL356031333(205)942-6168(256)353-1713(205)941-1603(FAX)(256)340-9359(FAX)MoWteBlanchMoMleCoastal2204PerimeterRoad4171CommandersDriveMobile,AL36615-1131Mobile,AL366151421(251)45Ck3400(251) 432-6533(251)4792593(FAX)(251) 432-6598(FAX)
H. R. 3096 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the building occupied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation located 

at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, as the ‘‘Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The building occupied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation 

located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, shall be known and 

designated as the ‘‘Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center’’ 

during the period in which the building is occupied by the Federal 

Bureau of Investigation. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

During the period in which the building referred to in section 

1 is occupied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, any reference 

in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of 

the United States to that building shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6378

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROGER BUTLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CR-94-68-4-2, CA-97-117-4-H)

Submitted: May 29, 1998 Decided: August 25, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States

Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We find that even if the district court’s entry of the amended judgment on September 16, 1996,

triggered the one-year limitation period of § 2255 and the motion

was therefore timely filed, Butler is still not entitled to any

relief under § 2255. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26899]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Radiological Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory 
Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). At least one 
portion of the meeting will be closed to the public.
    Name of Committee: Radiological Devices Panel of the Medical 
Devices Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on November 6, 2000, 10 
a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Location: Corporate Bldg., conference room 020B, 9200 Corporate 
Blvd., Rockville, MD.
    Contact Person: Robert J. Doyle, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health (HFZ-470), Food and Drug Administration, 9200 
Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-594-1212, or FDA Advisory 
Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the 
Washington, DC area), code 12526. Please call the Information Line for 
up-to-date information on this meeting.
    Agenda: The committee will discuss, make recommendations, and vote 
on a premarket approval application for an embolic radiation therapy 
device.
    Procedure: On November 6, 2000, from 10 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., and 
from 1 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., the meeting is open to the public. Interested 
persons may present data, information, or views, orally or in writing, 
on issues pending before the committee. Written submissions may be made 
to the contact person by October 26, 2000. Oral presentations from the 
public will be scheduled between approximately 10:15 a.m. and 10:45 
a.m., and for an additional 30 minutes near the end of the committee 
deliberations. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. 
Those desiring to make formal oral presentations should notify the 
contact person before October 26, 2000, and submit a brief statement of 
the general nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, 
the names and addresses of proposed participants, and an indication of 
the approximate time requested to make their presentation.
    Closed Committee Deliberations: On November 6, 2000, from 12:30 
p.m. to 1 p.m., the meeting will be closed to the public to permit 
discussion and review of trade secret and/or confidential commercial 
information (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4)) regarding pending and future agency 
issues.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: October 13, 2000.
Linda A. Suydam,
Senior Associate Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 00-26899 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         In connection with the quarterly report of Tecumseh Products Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
David W. Kay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  August 1, 2003                   BY:   /s/ DAVID W. KAY
       --------------------------            -----------------------------------
                                               David W. Kay
                                                Vice President, Treasurer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 21.01

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     NAME                                   JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION          ALSO DOES BUSINESS AS
     ----                                   -----------------------------          ---------------------
<S>                                         <C>                                 <C>
Subsidiaries of Registrant:
     CSK Auto, Inc. ("Auto")                            Arizona                 Checker Auto Parts, Kragen Auto
                                                                                Parts, Schuck's Auto Supply

Subsidiaries of Auto:
     CSKAUTO.COM, Inc.                                 Delaware
     Automotive Information Systems,                   Minnesota                Identifix
     Inc.
</TABLE>