alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.B

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ending March 31, 2003, of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                  /s/ GREG G. GRUBER
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      Greg G. Gruber
                                          Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                                  Officer and Treasurer
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)

                                          June 20, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and will be retained by
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### ALLEN et al. v. CRANE.

No. 12538.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

March 25, 1953.

Rehearing Overruled April 29, 1953.

*358Harvey L. Hardy and James V. Mondin, San Antonio, for appellants.

Lacy & Montemayor, San Antonio, for appellee.

POPE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment setting aside and cancelling an order of the Civil Service Commission of the City of San Antonio, and concerns Sections 16 and 18 of Article 1269m, Vernon’s Ann.Civ. Stats.

On July 15, 1952, appellee was indefinitely suspended from the San Antonio Police Department by an order of the Chief of Police. Within the required time, he perfected his statutory appeal to the Firemen’s and Policemen’s Civil Service Commission. On August 7, 1952, that Commission issued an order reciting and finding as a fact that appellee unjustifiably struck a named person and then stated:

> “It is the opinion of the Board that the said indefinite suspension should be confirmed. Therefore, we are this date instigating procedure to remove you from the Police Department and the payroll.”

Appellee then undertook to appeal from that order within ten days, that being the time required by Section 18 of Article 1269m. He asserted that the order of the Commission was void because it did not include certain mandatory orders required by Section 16 of Article 1269m. That section states, among other matters: “Said decision shall state whether or not the suspended officer or employee shall be permanently or temporarily dismissed from the Fire or Police Department or be restored to his former position or status in the classified service in the department.” The order did not so state, and whether the officer was dismissed is undetermined. The trial court upheld appellee’s contention and stated that the Commission’s order “is merely an expression of an opinion of the said Civil Service Commission,” and held further that the order was not a final decision, as expressly required by the law.

However, that status, rather than constituting reasons to nullify the Commission’s decision as was ordered by the trial court, was proof of the nonexistence of a final decision. “Final decision” means a decision which leaves nothing open to dispute. So long as matters remain open, unfinished or inconclusive, there is no final decision. See Holdsworth v. U. S., 1 Cir., 179 F.2d 933, 935. A final decision by the Commission was a necessary predicate to *359an appeal to the district should take steps to procure such a final appealable order from the Commission. Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Company, 304 U.S. 375, 58 S.Ct. 963, 82 L.Ed. 1408. court. Appellee

Since the appeal from the Commission to the district court was a nullity, the appeal to this Court is void. The judgment is reversed and the cause dismissed, leaving this matter pending before the Civil Service Commission for final disposition.
#### BRUNETTE v. STATE.

No. 25853.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 7, 1952.

*488No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a fine of $50 on a charge of driving on a public highway while intoxicated.

We find no statement of facts in the record. There" is one bill of exception which shows on its face to be without merit and need not be discussed.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tektronix, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 29, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard H. Wills, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:    January 9, 2004


/s/ RICHARD H. WILLS
-------------------------------------
Richard H. Wills
President and Chief Executive Officer
# AGENCY:

 Federal Highway Administration, Coast Guard, DOT.

# ACTION:

 Notice of public hearings; correction.

# SUMMARY:

 This document contains corrections to the notice of public hearings which was published January 6, 2000 (65 FR 801). The notice announced the dates and locations of two public hearings to receive information concerning the environmental and navigational impacts of the replacement of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge, but the notice did not contain the snow dates for these meetings.

# DATES:

 This correction is effective on February 7, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Mr. John Gerner, Project Manager (FHWA), Woodrow Wilson Bridge Center, 1800 Duke Street, Suite 200, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 (703 519-9800); Mr. N.E. Mpras, Chief, Office of Bridge Administration, Commandant (G-OPT), U.S. Coast Guard, 2100 Second Street, SW, Washington, DC 20593 (202 267-0368); or Ms. Ann Deaton, Chief, Bridge Administration Branch, Fifth Coast Guard District, Federal Building, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704-5004 (757 398-6222).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Need for Correction

The Federal Highway Administration and the Coast Guard published a document in the Federal Register of January 6, 2000 (65 FR 801), which announced the dates and location of two public hearings to receive information concerning the environmental and navigational impacts of the replacements of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge. That document failed to publish alternative snow dates for these meetings. This document corrects that oversight.

                    In notice FR Doc. 00-258 published on January 6, 2000 (65 FR 801), make the following corrections: On page 801, second column, under                     **DATES:**                     correct the first sentence to read “The hearing will start 7 p.m. on Tuesday, February 8, (snow date February 15) and Thursday, February 10, 2000, (snow date February 16) and display materials will be available beginning at 5:30 p.m. on these dates.”                

Dated: February 2, 2000.

Terry M. Cross,

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Director of Operations Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-2694  Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
INTAKE COPY 

HUNG FEE RECEWF COPY 

Court Name: TEXAS WESTERN 

Division: 5 Receipt Number: 500054682 

Cashier ID: cigarci 

Transaction Date: 06L24/2020 

Payer Name: RODR100 LANTIJ CIVIL FILING FEE 

For: MELODY CANTUDR. RODRIGO CANTU 

Amount: $460.00 

PAPER CHECK 

Check/Money Order Num: 119 

Amt Tendered: $400.00 

Total Due: $400.00 

Total Tendered: $400.00 

Change Amt: $0.00 

5:20-CV-748. MELODY JOY GANTU AND 

DR. RODRIGO CANTU V. DR. SANDRA 

GUERRA AND DIGITAL FORENSICS 

CORPORATION. 

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 1-2 Filed 06/24/20 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q DATED
JUNE 27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<CIK> 0000094673
<NAME> STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-27-1997
<CASH>                                       473,358
<SECURITIES>                                 127,918
<RECEIVABLES>                                496,402 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  263,698
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,361,376
<PP&E>                                       310,776 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,946,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        499,816
<BONDS>                                       21,455
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      12,454
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,385,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,946,801
<SALES>                                      667,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             955,619
<CGS>                                        365,198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                524,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              96,958
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,664
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              128,273
<INCOME-TAX>                                  34,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           93,573
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  93,573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.75
<FN>
   <F1> Asset values for the interim period represent
        net amounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1

                    SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

        THIS  SECOND  AMENDMENT  (the  "Second  Amendment")  to  the  Employment
Agreement  dated as of the 1st day of  October,  1998,  and as amended  June 16,
1999, is entered into as of the 21st day of February,  2001, by and between Tech
Laboratories,  Inc., with its principal place of business at 955 Belmont Avenue,
North  Haledon,  NJ (the  "Company"),  and Bernard M.  Ciongoli,  residing at 17
Liberty Ridge Trail, Totowa, NJ (the "Executive"). The Company and the Executive
are individually  referred to as a "Party" and  collectively  referred to as the
"Parties."

        WHEREAS,  the  undersigned  are the Parties to an  Employment  Agreement
dated as of  October  1, 1998,  as  amended  on June 16,  1999 (the  "Employment
Agreement"); and

        WHEREAS,  under Paragraph 16 of the Employment Agreement the Parties may
amend the Employment Agreement in a writing signed by the Parties;

        NOW,  THEREFORE,  the Parties hereby amend the  Employment  Agreement as
follows:

        Paragraph  2 of said  Employment  Agreement  is  hereby  deleted  in its
entirety and the following new paragraph is hereby inserted in lieu thereof:

        Subject to the terms and conditions  hereinafter set forth,  the Company
hereby employs the Executive,  and the Executive hereby agrees to enter into the
employ of the Company, or any parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of the Company as
the Company shall from time to time select, for an employment term commencing as
of the 1st day of October,  1998, and continuing for a period of seven (7) years
from such date (the "Term of  Employment").  At the end of the  initial  Term of
Employment,  this  Agreement  shall  automatically  be renewed for an additional
three (3) year period,  unless either Party provides at least one hundred eighty
(180) days written notice of its decision not to renew the Agreement.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment
to be entered into as of the date and year herein above first set forth.

TECH LABORATORIES, INC.



By: /s/ Earl M. Bjorndal
   ---------------------
Name:   Earl M. Bjorndal
Title:  Vice President



EXECUTIVE

   /s/ Bernard M. Ciongoli
-------------------------
   Bernard M. Ciongoli
**Exhibit 32(ii)**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connect with the quarterly report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2005 to be filed with Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.



|Date:	April 13, 2005 | By: | /s/ Mark V. McDonough                      
|-------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------
|                     |     | Mark V. McDonough,
 Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the annual report of Qiao Xing Universal Telephone, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rui Lin Wu, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ RUI LIN WURui Lin WuChief Executive OfficerJune 30, 2005
#### DODD v. STATE.

No. 23937.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 25, 1948.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*641GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for aggravated assault. The penalty assessed is confinement in the county jail for one month and a fine of $100.

The indictment and all other matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts and bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. MT01-2-000]

Take notice that on October 11, 2000, Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern) tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1 the following tariff sheets to be effective October 11, 2000:

Third Revised Sheet No. 219

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 220 

Northern states that the purpose of this filing is to remove Sections 17(a) and 17(b) of Northern's General Terms and Conditions of its Tariff in accordance with Order No. 637 which required that shared personnel and shared facilities be posted on a pipeline's internet website, update the reporting structure for its Pipeline Sales Division, and update the reference to electronic bulletin board personnel.

Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon Northern's customers and interested State Commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27089  Filed 10-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# AGENCY:

 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. 

# ACTION:

 Notice of meetings. 

# SUMMARY:

 This document announces the dates of the public meetings of the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee on the development of recommended amendments to the existing NHTSA regulations (49 CFR Part 567, 568) governing the certification of vehicles built in two or more stages to the Federal motor vehicle safety standards (49 CFR Part 571). The Committee was established under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. 

# DATES:

 The meetings are scheduled as follows: 

1. February 9-10, 2000. 

2. March 7-8, 2000. 

3. April 11-12, 2000. 

4. May 17-18, 2000. 

5. June 21-22, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

 The first meeting of the advisory committee will take place at the Hotel Washington, 515 Fifteenth Street, NW., and will begin at 10 on February 9th. Information on the location of subsequent meetings may be obtained from NHTSA two weeks before the relevant meeting is to take place. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

For non-legal issues, you may call Charles Hott, Office of Crashworthiness Standards, at 202-366-4920. 

For legal issues, you may call Rebecca MacPherson, Office of the Chief Counsel, at 202-366-2992. 

You may send mail to both of these officials at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

## I. Background 

On May 20, 1999, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) published a notice of intent to establish an advisory committee (Committee) for a negotiated rulemaking to develop recommendations for regulations governing the certification of vehicles built in two or more stages. The notice requested comment on membership, the interests affected by the rulemaking, the issues that the Committee should address, and the procedures that it should follow. The reader is referred to that notice (64 FR 27499) for further information on these issues. 

On December 14-15, 1999, interested parties attended a public meeting in Washington, DC. As part of that meeting, the schedule of specific dates for holding meetings of the Advisory Committee was agreed upon. Meetings of the Committee will be open to the public so that individuals who are not part of the Committee may attend and observe. Any person attending the Committee meetings may address the Committee, if time permits, or file statements with the Committee. 

## II. Authority

                        5 U.S.C. sections 561                         *et seq.*, delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50.                     

Start Printed Page 5848
Issued on: February 2, 2000. 

Stephen R. Kratzke, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Safety Performance Standards. 

[FR Doc. 00-2717 Filed 2-2-00; 4:34 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4910-59-P