### 56684 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Proposed Rules

(f) Compliance

Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done.
(g) Bonded Plug Installation

Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD: Drill a hole in stringers S–34L and S–35L, remove the plugs, and install and bond new plugs, in the forward EE bay of the lower lobe cargo compartments, as applicable, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB530024–00, Issue 001, dated May 15, 2014.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office.

(3) If the service information contains steps that are labeled as RC (Required for Compliance), those steps must be done to comply with this AD; any steps that are not labeled as RC are recommended. Those steps that are not labeled as RC may be deviated from, done as part of other actions, or done using accepted methods different from those identified in the specified service information without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the steps labeled as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in a serviceable condition. Any substitutions or changes to steps labeled as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(i) Related Information

(1) For more information about this AD, contact Francis Smith, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917– 6596; fax: 425–917–6590; email: francis.smith@faa.gov.

(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 12, 2014. Jeffrey E. Duven, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–22622 Filed 9–22–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0469; FRL–9912–66- Region 9]** 

**Revisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan; State Stationary**  **Source Rules**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions include two State statutes and certain State rules that govern stationary sources under the jurisdiction of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and that establish definitions and other general provisions; ambient air quality standards and area designations; and emissions limitations and other requirements for certain type of stationary sources. Generally, approval of these revisions updates and replaces previously approved provisions in the Arizona SIP, but EPA is also approving a few rules that are new to the Arizona SIP and a few rescissions that remove certain other rules from the Arizona SIP without replacement. The EPA is approving these revisions because they meet all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

**DATES :**  Any comments on this proposal must arrive by October 23, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA–R09– OAR–2014–0469, by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions.

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email. www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105–3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the **FOR**
**FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** section.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Christine Vineyard, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–4125, vineyard.christine@epa.gov.


### 56685 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Proposed Rules

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This proposal addresses the statutes and rules in the following table: Submitted Arizona Statutes and Rules Approved in This Action

Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) Section No. Title State effective date Submitted

49–402 ..................................... State and county control .......................................................... Amended through Laws 2002, Ch. 110, § 1. 10/29/12

49–426 (excluding paragraphs

D, E.1, F, I, J, and M) 1

. Permits; duties of director; exceptions; applications; objections; fees. Amended through Laws 1997, Ch. 178, § 5. 07/28/11

Arizona Administrative Code (AAC) Rule No. Title Effective date Submitted

R18–2–101 [excluding definitions (2), (20), (32), (87), (109), and (122)] 2

. Definitions ................................................................................. Various .................................... 10/29/12

R18–2–102 .............................. Incorporated Materials ............................................................. 08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12 R18–2–201 .............................. Particulate Matter: PM 10 and PM 2.5 ......................................... 08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12 R18–2–202 .............................. Sulfur Oxides (Sulfur Dioxide) ................................................. 08/07/12 . ................................. 10/29/12R18–2–203 .............................. Ozone: One-hour Standard and Eight-hour Averaged Standard. 08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12

R18–2–204 .............................. Carbon monoxide ..................................................................... 09/26/90 .................................. 07/28/11 R18–2–205 .............................. Nitrogen Oxides (Nitrogen Dioxide) ......................................... 08/07/12 ..... ............................. 10/29/12 R18–2–206 .............................. Lead ......................................................................................... 08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12R18–2–210 .............................. Attainment, Nonattainment, and Unclassifiable Area Designations. 08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12

R18–2–215 .............................. Ambient air quality monitoring methods and procedures ........ 09/26/90 ................... ............... 10/29/12R18–2–216 .............................. Interpretation of Ambient Air Quality Standards and Evaluation of Air Quality Data. 03/07/09 .................................. 10/29/12

R9–3–218 (rescission) ............ Violations .................................................................................. 08/07/12 (repeal) .................... 07/28/11 R18–2–601 .............................. General ..................................................................................... 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 R18–2–604 .............................. Open Areas, Dry Washes, or Riverbeds ................................. 11/15/93 ........... ....................... 07/15/98 R18–2–605 .............................. Roadways and Streets ............................................................. 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 R18–2–606 .............................. Material Handling ..................................................................... 11 /15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 R18–2–607 .............................. Storage piles ........................................................................... . 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 R18–2–608 .............................. Mineral Tailings ........................................................................ 03/07/09 .................................. 07/28/11 R18–2–614 .............................. Evaluation of nonpoint source emissions ................................ 08/07/12 ......... ......................... 07/15/98 R18–2–701 .............................. Definitions ................................................................................. 08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12 R18–2–703 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Fossil-fuel Fired Steam Generators and General Fuel-burning Equipment. 03/07/09 .................................. 07/28/11

R18–2–704 .............................. Standards of Performance for Incinerators .............................. 08/04/07 ......... ......................... 07/28/11 R18–2–706 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Nitric Acid Plants ....... 11/15/93 ................. ................. 07/15/98 R18–2–707 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Sulfuric Acid Plants ... 11/15/93 ................... ............... 07/15/98R9–3–509 (rescission) ............ Standards of Performance for Existing Petroleum Refineries Not yet repealed but no applicable sources. 07/15/98

R18–2–714 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Sewage Treatment Plants. 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98

R18–2–715(F), (G) and (H) ..... Standards of Performance for Existing Primary Copper Smelters: Site-Specific Requirements. 03/07/09 .................................. 07/28/11

R9–3–518 (rescission) ............ Standards of Performance for Existing Kraft Pulp Mills .......... 08/04/07 (repeal) ............. ....... 07/28/11 R18–2–719 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Stationary Rotating Machinery. 03/07/09 .................................. 07/28/11

R18–2–720 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Lime Manufacturing Plants. 03/07/09 .................................. 07/28/11

R18–2–723 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Concrete Batch Plants 11/15/93 .................... .............. 07/15/98 R18–2–724 .............................. Standards of Performance for Fossil-fuel Fired Industrial and Commercial Equipment. 03/07/09 .................................. 07/28/11

R18–2–726 .............................. Standards of Performance for Sandblasting Operations ......... 11/15/93 ................... ............... 07/15/98 R18–2–728 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Ammonium Sulfide Manufacturing Plants. 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98

R18–2–729 .............................. Standards of Performance for Cotton Gins ............................. 08/04/07 ........... ....................... 07/28/11 R18–2–730 .............................. Standards of Performance for Unclassified Sources ............... 03/07/09 ................ .................. 07/28/11R18–2–732 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators. 08/04/07 .................................. 07/28/11

Appendix 2 .............................. Test Methods and Protocols .................................................... 10/03/05 . ................................. 07/28/11 Appendix 10 (rescission) ......... Evaluation of Air Quality Data .................................................. 03/07/09 (repeal) .................... 07/28/11 Appendix 11 (rescission) ......... Allowable Particulate Emissions Computations ....................... 03/07/09 (repeal) .......... .......... 07/28/11 Not applicable .......................... Arizona Testing Manual for Air Pollutant Emissions, Revision F, March 1992, Section 1. March 1992 ............................. 07/28/11

1 The EPA will be taking action on ARS section 49–426(F) in a separate rulemaking action that will relate to Arizona’s amended New Source Review program. ADEQ does not intend the other paragraphs that are listed (i.e., D, E.1, I, J, and M) to be part of the Arizona SIP.

2 The EPA will be taking action on the following six definitions in R18–2–101 in a separate rulemaking action that will relate to Arizona’s amended New Source Review program: ‘‘actual emissions,’’ ‘‘begin actual construction,’’ ‘‘construction,’’ ‘‘net emissions increase,’’ ‘‘potential to emit,’’ and ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant.’’


### 56686 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Proposed Rules

In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we are approving these statutes and rules in a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further information, please see the direct final action.

Dated: May 30, 2014. Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX.

Editorial Note: This document was received for publication by the Office of Federal Register on September 17, 2014.

[FR Doc. 2014–22479 Filed 9–22–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR**

**Fish and Wildlife Service**

**50 CFR Part 17**

**[Docket No. FWS–R5–ES–2014–0021; FXES11130900000C6–123–FF09E30000]** 

**RIN 1018–AY83**

**Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Rule To Remove**  **the Delmarva Peninsula Fox Squirrel From the List of Endangered and**  **Threatened Wildlife**

**AGENCY :**  Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule; availability of draft post-delisting monitoring plan.

**SUMMARY :**  Under the authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to remove the Delmarva Peninsula fox squirrel ( Sciurus niger cinereus), more commonly called the Delmarva fox squirrel (DFS), from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife due to recovery. This proposed action is based on a thorough review of all available information, which indicates that the subspecies is now sufficiently abundant and distributed to withstand current and foreseeable threats to its long-term viability and thus no longer meets the definition of a threatened species or an endangered species under the Act.

We are also providing notification that a draft post-delisting monitoring (PDM) plan is available for public review. We are seeking information and comments from the public on this proposed rule and the PDM plan.

**DATES :**  We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before November 24, 2014. Comments submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see

**ADDRESSES** below) must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date. We must receive requests for public hearings, in writing, at the address shown in **FOR FURTHER**
**INFORMATION CONTACT** by November 7,
2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments by one of the following methods:

Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments to Docket No. FWS–R5–ES–2014–0021. Then, in the Search panel on the left side of the screen, under the Document Type heading, click on the Proposed Rules link to locate this document. You may submit a comment by clicking on ‘‘Send a Comment or Submission.’’

By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: Public Comments Processing, Attn: FWS–R5–ES–2014– 0021, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Headquarters, MS: BPHC, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–3803.

We will post all comments on http:// www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any personal information you provide (see the Public Comments section below for more information).

Copies of Documents: The proposed rule, draft post-delisting monitoring plan, and primary supporting documents are available on http:// www.regulations.gov. In addition, the supporting file for this proposed rule will be available for public inspection, by appointment during normal business hours, at the Chesapeake Bay Field Office, 177 Admiral Cochrane Dr., Annapolis, MD 21401, 410–573–4573, and on the Chesapeake Bay Field Office Web site at: http://www.fws.gov/ chesapeakebay /. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Services (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Questions or requests for additional information may be directed to Genevieve LaRouche, Field Supervisor, by telephone at 410–573–4573, or Cherry Keller, Wildlife Biologist, by electronic mail at cherry

_keller@fws.gov or by telephone 410–573–4532. Individuals who are hearing-impaired or speech-impaired may call the Federal Relay Service at 800–877–8337 for TTY assistance.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Executive Summary Purpose of Regulatory Action

We propose to remove the Delmarva fox squirrel from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife (50 CFR 17.11) due to recovery. This proposed action is based on a thorough review of the best available scientific and commercial information as assessed in two 5-year status reviews conducted in 2007 and 2012. These reviews, along with additional information that has become available since 2012, indicate that current threats to the Delmarva fox squirrel have been sufficiently abated and that the subspecies is now sufficiently abundant and widely distributed to withstand any foreseeable threat to its long-term viability. It therefore no longer meets the definition of a threatened species or an endangered species under Act. This document thus consists of: (1) A proposed rule to delist the Delmarva fox squirrel; and (2) anotice of availability of a draft postdelisting monitoring plan. Basis for Finding

Under the Endangered Species Act, a species may be determined to be endangered or threatened based on any of five factors: (A) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D) the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or (E) other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence. We must consider the same factors in delisting a species. We may delist a species if the best scientific and commercial data indicate the species is neither threatened nor endangered for one or more of the following reasons: (1) The species is extinct, (2) the species has recovered and is no longer threatened or endangered, or (3) the original scientific data used at the time the species was classified were in error.

The Delmarva Peninsula fox squirrel was listed as federally endangered in 1967, because its distribution had