alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
Exhibit 12

                         ADVANTA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                THREE MONTHS ENDED                SIX MONTHS ENDED
($ IN THOUSANDS)                                                     JUNE 30,                          JUNE 30,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               2003            2002            2003            2002
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                          <C>             <C>             <C>              <C>
Income from continuing operations                            $ 6,281         $ 7,124         $12,186          $11,358
Income tax expense                                             3,932           4,459           7,628            7,110
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings before income taxes                                  10,213          11,583          19,814           18,468
Fixed charges:
  Interest                                                    13,111          12,369          24,382           25,479
  One-third of all rentals                                       664             437           1,304              923
  Preferred stock dividend of subsidiary trust                 2,248           2,248           4,495            4,495
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Total fixed charges                                         16,023          15,054          30,181           30,897
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges               $26,236         $26,637         $49,995          $49,365
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(1)                           1.64 x          1.77 x          1.66 x           1.60 x
</TABLE>

(1)      For purposes of computing these ratios, "earnings" represent income
         before income taxes plus fixed charges. "Fixed charges" consist of
         interest expense, one-third (the portion deemed representative of the
         interest factor) of rental expense on operating leases, and preferred
         stock dividends of subsidiary trust.
|Exhibit 32


Written
Statement of the Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350


Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Teltronics, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify,
based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Ewen R. Cameron
Ewen R. CameronChief Executive
Officer
/s/ Patrick G. Min
Patrick G. MinChief Financial
Officer
Date:   November 14, 2003
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

James Boylan, Program Manager 

Planning and Support Program 

Air Protection Branch 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

JAN 3 0 2015 

Georgia Environmental Protection Division 

4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 

Atlanta, Georgia 30354 

Dear Mr. Boylan: 

Thank you for the letter from Jimmy Johnston dated December 23, 2014, transmitting a prehearing 

package regarding Georgia's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal addressing the 110(1) 

demonstration for the Georgia Fuel Rules. We understand that this submittal is the subject of a public 

hearing on January 30, 2015, if requested, with written comments due by the close ofbusiness on 

January 30, 2015. We have completed our review of the prehearing submittal and have one comment at 

this time. 

Effective January 1, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency began implementation of the CrossState Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) requiring states to significantly improve air quality by reducing 

power plant emissions that contribute to ozone and/or fine particle pollution in other states. The EPA is 

currently evaluating CSAPR implementation considerations and as such may need to provide subsequent 

guidance to EPD on the contingency measures documented in Georgia's SIP revision in the future. 

We look forward to continuing to work with you and your staff. If you have any questions, please 

contact Ms. Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Air Regulatory Management Section, at (404) 562-9040, or have 

your staff contact Mr. Richard Wong at 404-562-8726. 

Sincerely, 

~MW R. Scott Davis 

Chief 

Air Planning Branch 

cc: Elisabeth Munsey, Georgia Environmental Protection Division 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recyled/Recyclable • Printed w1th Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
#### ROACH v. STATE.

No. 25255.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 28, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted for passing as true a certain alleged forged instrument and assessed a term of two years in the *state penitentiary, and he appeals.*

After this cause was tried and the appeal perfected to this court, it is made to appear by a proper affidavit that the appellant, who was confined in jail, made his escape therefrom and has remained at large since the night of February 1, 1951. Therefore, the State’s Attorney moves to dismiss this appeal, which motion is accordingly granted. See Art. 824, Vernon’s Ann.C.CJ?.

*The*appeal is *dismissed.*
#### RAMEY & MATHIS, Incorporated, v. PITTS, Chief Justice, et al.

No. 6021.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

June 20, 1950.

Underwood, Wilson, Sutton, Heare & Boyce, Amarillo (H. A. Berry, Amarillo, of counsel), for appellant.

Carrington, Gowan, Johnson & Walker, Dallas, and R. C. Marshall, Borger, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the trial court sustained a plea of privilege filed by defendant, D. W. Page, in the original cause out of which this action grew and ordered the case transferred to Hutchinson County, Texas, and the judgment was affirmed by this court for the reasons stated in its opinion, published in Tex.Civ.App., 228 S.W.2d 976, styled Ramey & Mathis, Inc., v. Page; and it further appearing that thereafter on May 31, 1950, the Supreme Court of Texas, 230 S.W.2d 211, held that both the trial court and this court erred in sustaining the said plea of privilege and authorized the issu-*687anee of a writ of mandamus to compel this court to certify to it a controlling question in the case unless this court voluntarily conforms its ruling and decision in the matter to the said opinion of the Supreme Court;

Therefore, as a result of the holding made in this cause by the Supreme Court of Texas, this court does voluntarily conform its ruling and decision in the matter to the opinion and holdings of the Supreme Court and does, by reason of such opinion and holding of the Supreme Court, direct the trial court to overrule the plea of privilege filed by D. W. Page in the original cause and try the original case on its merits in the 108th District Court of Potter County, Texas.
----

| a)   | all      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,      process, summarize and report financial information;  and |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b)   | any      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control      over financial reporting. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | May 9, 2008 | /s/ Ronald H.      Braam     |
|--------|-------------|------------------------------|
|   |        | Ronald      H. Braam         |
|   |        | Chief      Executive Officer |

----

| a)   | all      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,      process, summarize and report financial information;  and |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b)   | any      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control      over financial reporting. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | May 9, 2008 | /s/ Gregory M.      Bowie    |
|--------|-------------|------------------------------|
|   |        | Gregory      M. Bowie        |
|   |        | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before November 27, 2000 to be assured of consideration. 

## Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) 

*OMB Number:*                     1512-0539.                 

*Form Number:*                     None.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     Statement of Process-Marking of Plastic Explosives for the Purpose of Detection.                 

*Description:*                     The information contained in the statement of process is required to ensure compliance with the provisions of Public Law 104-132. This information will be used to ensure that plastic explosives.                 

*Respondents:*                     Business or other for-profit.                 

*Estimated Number of Respondents:*                     8.                 

*Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent:*                     30 minutes.                 

*Frequency of Response:*                     Quarterly.                 

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                     16 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     Frank Bowers (202) 927-8930, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Room 3200, 650 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20226.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                 

Lois K. Holland, 

Departmental Reports Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-27472 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Stone
Container Corporation and Subsidiaries' March 31, 1998 Consolidated Balance
Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Operations and Accumulated Deficit and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             108
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      692
<ALLOWANCES>                                        26
<INVENTORY>                                        722
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1625
<PP&E>                                            4859
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1084
<BONDS>                                           4051
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        115
<COMMON>                                           971
<OTHER-SE>                                       (870)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5832
<SALES>                                           1265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1265
<CGS>                                             1047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (4)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (106)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (37)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (69)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (69)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.71)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          26,646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  672,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,107
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,923,906
<PP&E>                                         350,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                 270,746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,267,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,138,920
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    18,135,240
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,267,632
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               629,221
<CGS>                                          444,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,657,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,515
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,515
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.001
        

</TABLE>
#### SHIRLEY v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 15, 1952.

Sidney Baer, Louisville, for appellant.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

COMBS, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of involuntary manslaughter as a result of the death of Marilyn Kleier. Miss Kleier died from injuries received by her when a truck driven by appellant left the street and knocked *456down a telephone pole which 'struck her. The sentence is one year in jail and a fine of $500. Appellant has filed motion for appeal.

The case was tried prior to this Court’s decision in Marye v. Commonwealth, Ky., 240 S.W.2d 852, and the instruction on involuntary manslaughter is substantially the same as the one held to be erroneous in that case. The judgment must be reversed for the reason stated in the Marye case.

Appellant also contends he was entitled to a directed verdict, and in the alternative to an instruction on “sudden emergency.” We do not agree. The substance of the testimony is that the accident occurred when appellant attempted to pass a vehicle in front of him. There is also evidence that he was intoxicated. There is sufficient evidence to submit to the jury on both voluntary and involuntary manslaughter, and the facts do not entitle him to an instruction on sudden emergency.

The motion for an appeal is sustained, and the judgment is reversed for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

     In connection with the quarterly report of Tecumseh Products Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Todd
W. Herrick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 8, 2005                   BY: /s/ TODD W. HERRICK
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Todd W. Herrick
                                            President and Chief Executive
                                            Officer
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2011

p0620 

# Order

June 28, 2011

142755

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142755 COA: 293233 RUSSELL DUANE WHITE, Muskegon CC: 08-056801-FH Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.