UASolutions Group, Inc. 2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa FL 32926 Tel: (321) 261

- 2547
kellyneubecker@uasolutionsgroup.com

September 9
, 2015
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re : Summary Grant Petition for an Exemption to Conduct Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (s UAS ) Operations Allowed by Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 , 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

A. Summary
On behalf of our client
, Green Drone Inspections , LLC ( Green Drone Inspections ) and

p ursuant to Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (“FMRA”) , Subs ec ti on ( f ) of 49 U

. S

. C

. § 44701
, and 14 C.F.R. Part 11
, Green Drone Inspections
, ( hereafter known as the “Petitioner”)
, s eeks exemption from the following listed Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) to allow commercial operation of the previously approved DJI Phantom Series
, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee
within the N ational A irspace System (NAS) for controlled, low

- risk
, aerial photography and

survey, data collection for industrial inspections including p ipe line, p ower lines, w ind turbines,

s olar f arms, f lare stack, and offshore platforms
, and first responder/emergency management
conducted within and under the conditions outline d herein, or as may be established by the FAA, as required by Section 333 requirements. As described more fully below, the requested exemption would permit the operation of
the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee s UAS by
Petitioner under controlled conditions in predetermined airspace that is 1) Limited in scope 2 )2

Controlled as to access by mission essential personnel only

. Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportati on’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities to “...establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system” as stated within Section 333(c) of the FMRA. In making this determination, the Secretary is required to determine which types of s UAS do no t create a hazard
to users of t h e NAS or the public or pose a threat to national security in light of the aircraft’s size, weight, speed and operational capability; Operation of the s UAS in close proximity to airports and population centers; Operation of a s UAS within visual line of sight of the operator.
Grant of t h e requested exemption is in the public interest based upon the concise direction expressed within section 333 of the reform act; the added auth ority granted by the Act, as amended; an equivalent level of safety regarding flight operations as expressed herein, and significant cost savings achieved by transitioning from traditional manned aerial resources to

s UAS . The petitioner respectfully reques ts that the FAA grant the requested exemption without delay. Petitioner will operate the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee sUAS s while keeping the documents required by the regulations at the ground control station and immediately accessible to the P ilot i n C ommand (PIC) and by modification of
the required markings (registration n umber) of the s UAS to be displayed on the fuselage of the
unmanned aircraft.

The name and address of the Petitioner is:

Green Drone Inspections , LLC
The primary contact for this petition, with a copy to me at the address above is :

Kevin A. Coward Green Drone Inspections , LLC 220 Ravenglass Way Colorado Springs, CO 80906

B. Regulations

– Exemptions Requested

a. 14 C.F.R. 45.23 (b) b. 14 C.F.R. 61.23
, c. 14 C.F.R. 61.101 (e)( 4) &(5) d

. 14 C.F.R

. 61.113(a) and (b),

e. 14 C.F.R. 61.315(a), f

. 14 C.F.R

. 91.7(a), g

. 14 C.F.R

. 91.105,3

h

. 14 C.F.R

. 91.119 (c) i

. 14 C.F.R. 91.121, j

. 14 C.F.R

. 91.151 (a) (b), k

. 14 C.F.R

. 91.405(a), l

. 14 C.F.R

. 9 1.407(a)(1),

m

. 14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(1) and ( 2 ), and

n

. 14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) and (b).

C

. Background
Green Drone Inspections is a Colorado based company providing a complete line of sUAS and unmanned solutions with the operational infrastructure to provide low

- risk, a erial photography and survey, data collection for industrial inspections including pipe line, power lines, wind turbines, solar farms, flare stack, and offshore platforms, and first responder/emergency management in different geographical locations throughout the United
States i n a safe, convenient, and legal manner.

The sUAS s for the purposes of this petition is the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee

. Each of these aircraft meet the requirements for determination of Summary Grant for exemption as each platform has been previously approved by the FAA in numerous other Petitions. All pertinent operational and maintenance manuals have been previously submitted
, reviewed , and approved by the FAA for each of the requested platforms

. Petitioner w ill operate only within v isual line of sight (VLOS) and during daylight hours
in Visual Fli ght Rules (VFR) conditions. Additionally
, Petitioner will operate only within the parameters defined in the blanket Certificate of Authorization (COA) issued by the FAA under
the new interim policy. In the event any Green Drone Inspections operation exceeds the 200 foot limitation imposed by the policy, a separate COA specific to the airspace required for that operation will be obtained prior to flight operations. Such requirements will insure that the
sUAS will “not create a hazard to user s of the national airspace system or the “public” as stated
in Section 333 of the FMRA.

D. Airworthiness A critical element of consideration for grant of the petition is evidence of an equivalent level of safety for airworthiness of the s UAS

. The FAA has been authorized to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an actual airworthiness certificate in accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of PL 112

- 95 in reference to 49 USC 44704, in consideration of4

the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation. , Also, in accordance with FAA N 8900.291, Petitioner ha s an established inspection and maintenance program for the continued airworthiness of the aircraft in accordance with the
manufacture’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for
the aircraft and aircraft components.
Green Drone Inspection ’ s standard operating procedures are detailed within the Flight Operation Limitations and Safety section on page 7

. E

. Operational Capabilities

Petitioner seeks an exemption to operate the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee for limited approved com mercial pu r poses within the
NAS 1

. The se aircraft are all comprised of the UA and a transportable GCS. The y do not carry any flammable propellant or fuel. The sUAS s also ha ve integrated GPS system s that
calculates the s UAS's position and height and relays that information via a secure connection to the operator. Additionally, the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee
, have the capability to operate safely after experiencing certain in

- flight

co ntingencies or failures and uses an auto

- pilot system to maintain stability and control. The y

are also able to respond to a loss of GPS or a lost

- link event with pre

- coordinated automated flight maneuvers.

` F. Regulatory Basis for Petition

Petitioner
, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § § 11. 6 1 (b), 11.81, 2 and the FAA Modernization and
Reform Act of 2012 ( “ FMRA ” ) , Section 333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems ( “ Section 333 ” )
, hereby respectfully petitions the Administrator for an exemption from
the requirements of 14 C.F.R. 45.23 (b), 14 C.F.R. 61.23
, 14 C.F.R. 61.101 (e)( 4) &(5), 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) and (b), 14 C.F.R. 61.315(a), 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a), 14 C.F.R. 91.105, 14 C.F.R. 91.119(c)
, 14 C.F.R. 91.121, 14 C.F.R. 91.151 (a) (b), 14 C.F.R. 91.405(a), 14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1), 14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) and (b).

1 Green Drone Inspections will submit Aircraft Registration Applications as required, upon the grant of the exemptions sought by this petition. 2 14 C.F.R. § 11. 6 1 (b) (“ Using a petition for exemption, you may ask FAA to grant you relief from current regulations in 14 C.F.R.”) , 14 C.F.R. § 11.81 (“ What information must I include in my petition for an exemption ”) ?5

1. Section 333 Congress identifies Section 333 of the FMRA, as a pathway for “ expedited operational
authorization ” of certain sUAS in the NAS

. Section 33 3 (b)(1) ( “ expedited operational
authorization. ” )

. 3 Under Section 333 Congress mandates that the FAA “ shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion
of the plan and rulemaking required by S ection 332 of this Act or the guidance required by
section 334 of this Act ” ( Section 33 3(a) ) upon consider ation of its “ size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation w ithin visual line of sig ht

. ”
Section 333(b) (1 ). I f the FAA makes such a determination, the FAA “ shall [also] establish requirements for the safe operation

. ” Section 33 3(c)

. T he FAA further may find that the sUAS does not require “ airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code

. ” Section 333(b) (2)

. 2. 49 U.S.C. § 44701
T he FAA is further authorized to grant exemptions from its safety regulations and
minimum standards under 49 U.S.C. § 44701 ( “ Section 44701 ” ) “ if the Administrator finds the exemption is in the public interest. ” Section 44701(f) 4 (authorizing the grant of exemptions from safety regulations and minimum standards under S ection 44701(a) and (b) and
S ections 44702

- 44716). 5
For the reasons addressed herein
, this Petition q ualifies for expedited approval of
Petitioner ’s request for exemption under both Section 333 of the FMRA and 49 U.S.C § 44701

.
G. Statutory Criteria for Exemption under Section 333

G iven their small size, light weight, slow speed, limited load capacity, superior operational capabilities
, and that the operations will be conducted only during the day, under visual meteorological conditions ( “ VMC ” ), within V LOS of the PIC, with the assistance of a

3 See also www.faa.gov/ sUAS /legislative_programs /section_333/ (noting that Section 333 grants the FAA “the statutory flexibility to expedite requirements for the safe operation of certain aircraft systems in the NAS.”).

4 U n d er 4 9 U

. S

. C

. § 4 47 0 1( f )
, t h e “ A d m

i n i s t r at o r m a y g r a n t an e x e m p ti o n f r o m a r e q u i r e m e n t

o f a r e g u lati o n pr e s c r i b ed un d er su b s ecti o n ( a ) o r ( b ) o f t h is s ecti o n o r a n y o f s ecti o n s 44702

- 447 1 6 o f [ T i t le 49 ] if t h e A d m i n i s t r at o r f i n d s t h e e x e m

p ti o n is i n t h e p u b lic i n te r e s t

. ” 5 See e.g. 49 US C §44711 ( a )(1) prohibiting operations without airworthiness certificate; (2) prohibiting serving as airman without airman’s certificate; (5) prohibiting commercial operations in violation of regulations) ; 49 US C §44 7 04 (issuance of airworthiness certificate); 14 C.F.R. §91

. 203 ( a ) ( 1 ) (carry airworthiness certificate)).6

visual safety observer ( “ VO ” )
, and confined within the boundaries of a consenting landowner’s
property and not in the proximity of populated areas , the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee are the very category of sUAS that qualifies for expedited approval under Section 333

. 1

. Proximity to Airports/Populat ion Centers or A reas

F light o pe r a t i ons pursuant to t h i s Petition w i l l be t i g h t l y con t r o ll ed and restricted to
low risk a reas and in accordance with the blanket 200

- foot COA requirements at an altitude of no more than 200 feet above ground level (AGL). In the event a Green Drone Inspections operation is required to exceed the 200

- foot limitation imposed by the policy, a separate COA specific to the airspace required for that operation will be obtained prior to operations at an altitude of no more
than 400 feet AGL. All altitudes reported to ATC will be in AGL when r equired and a ny operations conducted within 5 nautical miles (NM) of the geographic center of a non

- towered airport will obtain a Letter of Agreement with the appropriate airport management and made
available to FAA upon request. In addition, a ccess to any property will be limited to persons
associated with and necessary to flight operations.

2

. Visual Line

- of

- Sight The minimum crew for each operation will consist of a PIC and VO . The VO will be used as an additional mitigation to sati sfy the VLOS requirement, but the PIC will always
maintain VLOS with the sUAS

. T he aircraft will at all times be flown by Petitioner only in the daytime (not at night) under VMC
, within VLOS of the PIC
, with the further assistance of the
VO with whom the PIC will have the ability for direct and continuous two

- way verbal
communication s 6 so as to ensure that the flight operations remain w i t h i n the PIC’s VLOS and prescribed flight boundaries and de

- conflict with objects in the air and on the ground. Thus
, pursuant to the FAA Order 8900.1 Volume 16, Chapter 1, Section 3, the proposed operations
will provide an approved method of control and collision avoidance to sati sfy the “ see and
avoid ” requirement of 14 C

. F

. R

. § 91.113 : Only qualified and current PIC’s and VOs will be used

.
3

. Other Factors

6 PIC and VO are within speaking distance and all communications between PIC and VO will be without communications equipment7 a. Petitioner proposes that requirements should take into account the
characteristics of th ese particular s UAS s

. The DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee are all characterized by a high degree of pre

- programmed control,
various built

- in technical capabilities that limit the potential for operation outside of the operating conditions as set forth below, and many built

- in functional, safety and redundancy
features to ensure a safe and reliable operation. At a minimum: geo

- fencing at a maximum ceiling of 200’or 400' AGL, flight programming capabilities, a flight termination link available to the operator to prevent a "fly away," and safe abort procedures. If the DJI P hantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee loses communications or their GPS signal, they will return to a pre

- determined location and land or be recovered in accordance with
the User’s Manual. The airframes will have markings identifying the serial number and identification (N

- number) markings as large as practicable. Further, Green Drone Inspections operation s will comply with all manufacturer Safety Bulletins.

b

. Safety Management System A Safety Management System (SMS) approach will regulate Petitioner ’s operation of
the sUASs and will significantly contribute to maintaining the level of safety contemplated by
the airworthiness certificate requirements from which Petitioner now seeks relief.
Pursuant to the S MS and 14 C.F.R. § 43.13, entitled Performance Rules (general)
, each

person performing maintenance, alteration, or preventive maintenance on the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee
, motor, propeller, or appliance
shall use the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the current manufacturer's User’s
Manual or Instructions for Continued Airworthiness prepared by its manufacturer, or other methods, techniques, and practices acceptable to the Administrator. Each person shall use the
tools and e quipment necessary to assure completion of the work in accordance with accepted industry practices.

c. Flight Operation L imitations and Safety In seeking this exemption, Petitioner proposes to operate all sUAS pursuant to the following specific operating limitations : 1. The DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly
eBee all weigh less than 55 pounds, fully loaded.
2. The aircraft shall only be operated at or below 2 00 ft

. AGL , unless a separate
COA specific to the airspace required for that operation is obtained prior to8 operations at an altitude of no more than 400 feet AGL.
3. All aircraft will be operated within VLOS of the PIC and safety VO.
4. The radio frequencies used for operations and control of the UAS (2.4GHz) will comply with the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements.
5. Operations shall be conducted p ursuant to Day Visual Flight Rules (VFR) in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) and only during daylight hours ( i.e. between the
end of morning civil twilight and the beginning of evening civil twilight, as published in the American Air Almanac, converted to local time).
6. The DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee
shall operate from on

- site takeoff/landing locations directly next to the PIC and co

located VO. The PIC and the VO shall be able to verbally communicate during all operations.
7. Operations shall be conducted by certificated airmen who possess either a commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate

. 8. The PIC will be a FAA licensed airman and will hold a current airman medical certificate or valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a state, the District of Colombia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal government. The PIC will also meet the flight review requirements specified in 14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.
9. The PIC shall have succes sfully completed the training and qualification process in
accordance with DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly
eBee Pilot Training Guide s . PIC qualification flight hours and currency will be logged
in a manner consistent with 14 CFR § 61.51(b). Training operations will only be conducted during dedicated training sessions.
10. A minimum of three take

- offs and three landings in the preceding 90 days will be required by the PIC to maintain currency, such log of which shall be made available to the Administrator upon request.
11. All op era tions will util i z e a VO. The UA will be op e ra t e d within the V L O S o f the
P I C a nd VO a t a ll tim e s. The VO m a y be u s e d to s a ti sfy the V L OS re q u i re m e nt a s lo n g a s the P I C a lw a y s m a int a ins V L O S ca p a bili t y . T h e VO a nd P I C will be a ble

to c ommuni ca te v er

b a l l y a t a ll tim e s; e l ec t r onic m e s s a g ing o r t e x ting is not9 p er mitt e d du r ing f

l i g ht op e r a tions. The P I C will be d e si g n a t e d b e f o r e t h e f li g ht a nd

c a nnot t ra n sfer his or h e r d e s i g n a tion f o r the du ra tion of the f

l i g ht. T h e P I C will

e nsu r e th a t the VO c a n p e r f o r m the d u ti e s re qui re d of t h e VO.
12. The s UA Ss will be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman
medical certificate or U.S. driver ’s license.
13. If a pilot certificate holder other than the PIC, who possesses the necessary PIC qualifications, is also present during flight operations, that person can also be designated as PIC and will follow the necessary p rocedures to assume control.
14. A briefing will be conducted in regard to the planned o perations prior to each flight

. It will be mandatory that all personnel who are performing duties within the boundaries of the flight operations safety perimeter be present for the briefing.
15. Petitioner will obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued COA prior to conducting any actual flight operations

. Green Drone Inspections will only operate within the guidelines of the blanket 200

- foot COA under the FAA’s interim policy. For flights above 200 feet AGL, Green Drone Inspections will operate in a confined geographic area as defined by a separate approved ATO
issued COA.
16. Petitioner will file a NOTAM fo r each flight at least 24 h ours in advance of each flight with the appropriate FSDO.
17. Any operations that will be conducted within 5 nautical miles (NM) of the geographic center of a non

- towered airport will obtain a Letter of Agreement with the appropriate airport management and made available to FAA upon
request.
18. Prior to flight operations, Petitioner shall coordinate 1 hour ahead of the proposed flight a communication with the nearest local Air Traffic Control facility indicating location, altitude and du ration of the proposed flight.
19. A ny r equired permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate governmental agencies at least 12 hours in advance of an y flight10 operation

. 20. The DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee shall be marked with an identification (N

- Number) in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 45.23, such markings to be as large as practicable pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 45.29(f), and identified by a serial number registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 47.
21. All flights will remain clear and yield the right of way to all other manned operations and activities at all times, including, but not limited to: ultralight
vehi cles, parachute activities, parasailing activities, hang gliders, etc.
22. Flights will not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the
PIC.
23. The DJI Phantom Ser ies, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee
shall be operated at an airspeed not to exceed 87 knots.
24. Any time the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee is operating, all documents required under 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 and §
91.203 shall be available to the PIC at the GCS. Such documents shall be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.
25. Operations shall no t occur directl y over any person, except authorized and consenting personnel required for f light/ imaging operations,
26. The radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control of the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee shall comply wit h the requirements of users manuals

. T he aircraft s hall at all time s be operated to

ensure a safe distance away from all participating and non

- participating personnel
, at least 500 feet away from persons not involved in the flight operations (non

participating persons) unless:

 Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating

persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator

must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety of nonpartic ipating persons

.

 The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted11 permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and
determined that it does not present an undue hazard.
27. The flight will be terminated at 20% battery power reserve

. 28. Prior to each flight
, the PIC shall inspect the aircraft, including any inoperable components, items or equipment, to ensure it i s in a n airworthy condition for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects flight readiness or safe operations, the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee shall not be operated until the necessary maintenance has been pe rformed and it is found to be in a condition for safe flight. Any discrepancies and all maintenance or alterations shall be doc umented in the aircraft records, such records to be made available to the Administrator upon
request.
29. Except as may be designated otherwise for Fail

- Safe operations, t he aircraft shall
take off and land at a location within the boundaries of the subject property next to
the PIC.
30. Upon loss of communication or GPS signal, all sUAS shall return to a predetermined location within the boundaries of the landowner’s property and
land or be recovered in accordance with the User’s Manual

. 31. In the event of an emer gency or unanticipated obstacle to planned operations, the operation shall be aborted and the sUAS if airborne, shall return to a predetermined location.
32. The DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee
shall be maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and aircraft components and in accordance with FAA N 8900.291.
33. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled

- access property with permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.
34. Any incident, accident or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA shall be12 reported to the FAA’s UAS Integration Office within 24 hours. Accidents shall also be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Further flight operations shall not be conducted until the incident, accident or transgression is reviewed by the UAS Integration Office and authorization to resume operations is provide d.

d

. Privacy
All Green Drone I nspections s UAS operations will be conducted in accordance with applicable F ederal, S tate, and local laws regarding privacy. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled

- access property with permission from the land/building owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from land owner/controller or authorized representa tive will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

e

. Physical Security
In order to ensure its safe and proper us e , Petitioner will be the operator of the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee and the aircraft will
remain in Petitioner ’s custody during operations

. 4

. . Lack of Threat to the NAS, Public, or National Security For the reasons previously addressed, in cluding meeting Section 333( b)(1) criteria,
Petitioner ’s record of safety and the small size of the s UAS involved and the controlled sterile area within which they will operate, Petitioner falls squarely within that zone of safety (an equivalent level of safety) in which Congress envisioned that the FAA must, by exemption, allow commercial operations of s UAS s to commence immediately. Petitioner will operate the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee in accordance with the aforementioned flight limitations without creating a hazard to other aircraft or persons or property on the ground . T he fact that each PIC will be required to be screened by the Department of Homeland Security, approval of the petition presents no threat to national security

. Further, given their small size and limit load capacity, the aircraft are incapab le of carrying any substantial external load, including e x p l os i v e m a t e r i a l s or f l a mm ab l e li q u i ds. For all of these reasons, Petitioner ’s proposed operations using the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee qualify for expedited approval of the sought exemption pursuant to Section 333 for the specified uses and under the proposed operating requirements and restrictions.13

H

. Public Interest Benefits Granting Petitioner ’s request for exemption would benefit the public and have no adverse effect on safety for the following reasons

. 1. Public Interest Generally The grant of the requested exemption is in the public interest based on the clear direction in Section 333 and 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), the equivalen t and enhanced level of safety of the proposed operations, the significant public benefit, and cost savings to be realized as a result of
the use of sUAS for product demonstration and training services. Moreover, the FAA has previously granted identical e xemptions for sUAS

. 7 The DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee are battery powered s UAS s that serves as a safe r , more efficient, and economical alternative to larger and heavier manned aircraft carrying flammable liquid fuels
, traditionally use for aerial photography or aerial surveying

. This will provide for a n added superior level of safety to persons and property in the air and on the ground than that provided by manned aircraft performing the same operations. No p ilot or cre w need be airborne
and g ranting the exemption would also decrease the number of manned aircraft in the NAS and, as a result, reduce congestion as well as the environmental impact of such operations

. Using
the se aircraft also provides the benefit of greater operational flexibility and reduced cost when compared to manned aircraft.

a

. Increased Aircrew Safety and Reduced Risk to P ersons/ Property o n G

round
Because the platforms are unmanned, the proposed operations eliminate the risk to pilot and

crew associated with flying such aerial

- surveying missions in confined airspace at low altitude

. Further, g iven its small size and weight and low air speed
, using the se platforms also reduces the risk of damage or injury to persons or property on the ground , and in the air, were there to be a n unforeseen mishap

.

b

. Reduced Environmental Impact
U sing s UAS instead of manned aircraft also benefit s the public by eliminating or greatly reducing air and noise pollution associated with traditional aerial imaging operations

. Because they are battery power ed and uses electric motors, the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS,

7 Green DroneInspections r e q u e s ts t h at t h e F AA n ot solicit p u b lic c o mm e n t o n i t s petition b eca us e it w o u ld n o t s et a ny new pr ece d e n t a n d b eca u s e t h e r elief r e q u e s ted is i d e n tic a l to e x e m p ti o n s g r a n ted pr e v i o us l y . 1 4 C

. F

. R

. § 11.87.14

Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee s UAS consumes no fuel
, generates no air pollution
, and

creates very little noise . As a result, the public is benefited as a result of reduced enviro nmental impact, r educed operator and other human exposure , and greater fuel conservation, which

serves additionally to su pport our G overnment’s specific effort s to reduce the U.S.’s carbon footprint. 8

c

. Fewer Manned Aircraft i n the NAS and Reduced Need for ATC Handling
The DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee also
does not require a runway or helipad to takeoff or land and will not be operated within the close proximity of any airports without prior FAA approval

. As such , fewer aircraft will need to be
handled by a ir t raffic c ontrol during ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases. Operations pursuant to this Peti tion will further reduce the number of manned aircraft flying or transiting at or above 500’ AGL to and from the areas of imaging operations as well as congestion around airports due to aircraft arrival and departure.

d

. Superior Aerial Imagery and Increased Benefit to U.S. E conomy
B etter aerial footage can also be obtained using the se small and nimble platforms than can be
obtained using manned aircraft or other ground

- based methods

. Due to its small size and superior flight performance characteristics, the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee allows for images to be taken from certain locations and angles and with better precision than using manned air craft

. As a result, less time is needed in the air to obtain the desired footage
, which in addition to providing the benefit of fewer aircraft in the NAS and associated
reduced risk to objects and persons and property in the air and on the ground, reduced noise, etc., allows for the production of surveys , which benefit s consumers

. This additionally ensures that organizations such as Green Drone Inspections and its customers remain competitive and profitable, thereby providing their employees greater job stability, which ultimately contributes
further to the U.S. econom y through increased consumer spending

.

e

. Increased Operational Flexibility and Reduced Cost Using sUAS also provides the benefit of greater operational flexibility and reduced cost
when compared to manned aircraft. Instead of each time having to hire a manned aircraft at thousands of dollars/hour, subject to the pilot’s schedule and availability, Petitioner can operate
the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee
, at lower combined

8 Reducing the U.S.’s carbon footprint is a high priority and consistent with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s regulatory efforts to phase out the use of fossil fuels

.15

cost , innumerable times and at the convenience of Petitioner ’s and its customer ’ s schedules

. 2

. No Adverse Safety Effects Granting this Petition will also not adversely affect aviation safety or pose any undue
risks to the public. The operations pursuant to this Petition will be in accordance with approved processes and checkli st s an d in c o m p li ance w i t h all applicable FAA safety policies and guidance. Accordingly, and as detailed herein, g ranting the requested exemption would not adversely affect safety. Indeed
, as detailed below
, operations pursuant to the limitations and guidelines addressed herein and the safety procedures, Petitioner w ill provide a n equivalent
level of safety to those regulations from which Petition er seeks exemption

. The FAA has also recently set precedence by granting exemptions with similar purposes in all material respects,

to those presented herein

. For these reasons
, Petitioner’s operations pursuant to this Petition also qualify for an exemption

.
I. Exemption s Sought By Petitioner a nd Reasons f or t he Requested Relief
Pursuant to Section 333, Petitioner seeks an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R. 45.23 (b),14 C.F.R. 61.23, 14 C.F.R. 61.101 (e)(4) & (5),14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) and (b), 14 C.F.R. 61.315(a), 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a), 14 C.F.R. 91.105, 14 C.F.R. 91.119(c), 14 C.F.R. 91.121, 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a) (b), 14 C.F.R. 91.405(a), 14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1), 14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) and (b).

1. 14 C.F.R 45.23(b) Applicable codes of Federal Regulation require aircraft to be marked according to certain specifications. UASs are, by definition, unmanned. They therefore do not have a cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which to mark certain words or phrases. Further, two inch lettering is difficult to place on such small aircraft. Regardless, Green Drone Inspections will mark its UAS in the largest possible lettering by placing the "N" number on its fuselage as required by 14 CF R 45.29 (f) so that the pilot, technician, spotter and others working with the UAV will see the markings.

2. 14 C.F.R. 61.23 (a) &(c) Relief from the requirements of Section 61.23(a) and (c) is requested by
Petitioner w ho is seeking the approval to use a valid state issued driver’s license in lieu of
FAA issued Medical Certificate. The FAA has previously routinely approved the use of a valid state driver’s license as part of the “summary grant” exemptions.16

3. 14 C.F.R. 61.101 (e)(4) &(5)
Petitioner requests from this Section to enable the PIC to perform duties utilizing a recreational pilot’s license. The FAA has routinely approved the use of a recreational pilot license as part of the “summary grant” exemptions.

4. 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) and (b).
Petitioner seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) and (b). Section 61.113,
entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command
, subsections (a) and (b) state (emphasis added): (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (h) of this section, no person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as pilot in command of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for compens ation or hire, act as pilot in command of an aircraft

. (b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as pilot in command of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employ ment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or
hire. In general, subs ec t i ons 61

. 113 ( a ) and ( b ) prohibit a p r i v a t e p il o t from conducting

co m m e r c i al ope r a t i on s . Petitioner seeks exemption from the subsections because t he DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee w i l l not ca rr y a p il o t , passe n g e r s or property (other than a camera). As addressed, the platforms are very light, remotely controlled s UAS s with no persons or property on board. Each f li g h t is p l anned and fully coo r d i na t ed i n a d v ance in accordance with those procedures provided in the SOP

. Thus

t he r i s k assoc i a t ed w i t h the proposed ope r a t i on s is so d i m i n i shed fr om that ass o c i a t ed w i t h

co m m e r c i al ope r a t i ons con t e m p l a t ed by P a r t 61, t hat a ll o w i ng a PI C having a private pilot
certificate , rather than a commercial certificate, met the minimum flight hour and qualification criteria, and operating according to the limitations and guidelines provided herein
, provides a level of safety that e x ceeds t hat p r o v i ded by a pilot having a co mm e r c i al ce r t i f i ca t e op e r a t i n g a

con v en t i onal a i r c r a f

t as required under the regulations

. T he FAA has already set precedence by previously granted e x e m p t i ons in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein

.17

5. 14 C.F.R. 61.315(a)
Petitioner requests exemptions from this Section to enable the PIC to perform duties utilizing a recreational or sport pilot’s license. The FAA has routinely approved the use of a recreational or sport pilot license as part of the “summary grant” exemptions.
6. 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) Either finding that Petitioner meets the Section 333 criteria or exemption from the airworthiness certification requirement under 14 C. F.R. Part 21 renders subsection 91.7(a) inapplicable.
Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness
, subsection (a ) states (emphasis added):

“ No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition .” T here is no FAA standard by which such a determination of airworthiness can be made. Nonetheless, given t he limitations and procedures , as con t a i ned herein, the S afety Procedures contained within the
SOP , and the Maintenance Manual
, for maintaining the aircraft and checking it before each flight to ensure that it is in peak operational condition, an e q u i v a l ent l e v e l o f s a f e t y w il l be

p r o v i ded.
7. 14 C.F.R 91.105
Petitioner seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. 91.105. Section 91.105, entitled Flight
crewmembers at stations
, states (emphasis added): (a) During takeoff and landing, and while en route, each required flight
crewmember shall

— (1) Be at the crewmember station unless the absence is necessary to perform duties in connection with the operation of the aircraft or in connection with physiological needs; and (2) Keep the safety belt fastened while at the crewmember station.
(b) Each required flight crewmember of a U.S.

- registered civil aircraft shall, during takeoff and landing, keep h is or her shoulder harness fastened while at his or her assigned duty station . This paragraph does not apply if

— (1) The seat at the crewmember's station is not equipped with a shoulder harness; or
, (2) The crewmember would be unable to perform require d duties with the
shoulder harness fastened.18

In general, S ec t i on 91

. 105 requires pilot and crew to be at their duty stations and harnessed during flight

. Petitioner seeks exemption from the Section 91.105 because the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee s UA S are by their
d efinition unmanned aircraft, having neither pilot nor crew so as to be stationed or harnessed as required by the regulation. An e q u i v a l ent or even higher l e v el of s a f e t y can be provided instead by using an unmanned aircraft controlled by a PIC who at all times is located at and controls the
sUAS from the GCS.
8. 14 C.F.R. 91.119 (c)
Petitioner seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. 91.119(c). Section 91.119, entitled Minimum safe altitudes: General
, subsection (d) states (emphasis added): Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes:
(c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface
, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or

structure.

S ec t i on 91

. 119(c) e s t ab li shes s a f e a l t i t ud e s f

or ope r a t i on o f c i v i l a i r c r a f t over other than congested areas

. Petitioner seeks exemption from subsection 91.119(c) because, pursuant to this Petition, t he sUAS w il l at times be ope r a t ed either at or below 200 or 4 00 feet A G L

. An e q u i v a l ent or even higher l e v el of s a f e t y can be provided instead by, as provided herein, ope r a t ing so as to de

- conflict with manned vehicles operating above 500 feet AGL , within
the VLOS of the PIC with the assistance of a VO so as to ensure the safety of and de

- confliction with any persons or property in the air and on the ground , including participating and non

participating personnel, 100 feet and 500 feet, respectively, away from who the UA would generally be restricted . Furthe r, flight operations will be m on i t o r ed at all times by bo t h t he
PIC and VO and will be i n c o m p li ance w i t h l ocal pub li c s a f e t y r e q u i r e m en t s , so as to prevent

access to t he restricted a r eas o f ope r a t i on. The FAA has set precedence by previously granted e x e m p t i ons in circumstances similar,
in all material respects, to those presented herein

.
9

. 14 C.F.R. 91 .121
Petitioner seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. 91.121

. Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter19

settings , requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.” Petitioner seeks exemption from S ection 91.121 because the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee s UAS do n ot use or have on board a typical barometric altimeter as contemplated by the regulation.

Note: An equivalent level of safety will be provided instead, by operating the s UAS at
or below 400 feet AGL
, within the VLOS of the PIC (with the assistance of a VO)
, with altitude
information downlinked from the sUAS to the PIC to maintain altitude and ensure safety. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude/AGL will be established at the launch site, as confirmed for accuracy by the PIC.

10

. 14 C.F.R. 91 .151(b)
Petitioner seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. 91.151(b). Section 91.151(b), entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions
, states (emphasis added): (b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at lea st 20 minutes

.
The DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee are unmanned aircraft, and thus would not begin a flight with a person in it as the regulation contemplates . To t he extent the regulation applies to some of the rotor craft contemplated by
Green Drone Inspections , the maximum flight duration is 1 8 minutes
, depending upon atmospheric conditions and type of camera or sensor. A n e q u i v a l ent l e v el of s a f e t y can be ach i e v ed by terminating the flight at 20% battery

power reserve

. Given that the sUAS will be operated within the VLOS of the PIC, within the confines of the particular landowner’s property with prior written consent of the landowner and participating and non

- participating personnel, this restriction would provide more than enough battery reserve to accommodate a safe return to the landing zone from anywhere in the operating area with no adverse effect on the safety of persons and property in the air or on the ground.
The FAA has set precedence by previously granted e x e m p t i ons in circumstances similar,
in all material respects, to those presented herein

.20

11

. 14 C.F.R. 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), 91.417(a) and (b)
Section 91.405(a) , entitled Maintenance required
, states: Each owner or operator of an aircraft

— (a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescr ibed in part 43 of this chapter ;

Section 91.407(a)(1) , entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding,
or alteration
, states: (a) No person may oper ate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless

— (1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7 of this chapter;

Section 91.409 (a)(2) , entitled Inspections , states: (a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had

— (1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or (2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 of this chapter

. No inspection performed u nder paragraph (b) of this section may be substituted for any inspection required by this paragraph unless it is performed by a person authorized to perform annual inspections and is entered as an “annual” inspection in the required maintenance records.

Section 91.417(a) and (b) , entitled Maintenance records
, state: (a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413 , each registered owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (b) of this section: (1) Records of the maintenance, preventive mainte nance, and alteration and
records of the 100

- hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved21

inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records must include

— (i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the work performed; and (ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and (iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the
aircraft for r eturn to service.
(2) Records containing the following information: (i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller,
and each rotor. (ii) The current status of life

- limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, an d appliance. (iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis. (iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the last inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained. (v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives including, for each, the method of compliance, th e AD or safety directive number and revision date. If the AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required. (vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances.
(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed: ( 1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is performed.22

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and

tran sferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. (3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this chapter shall be retained u ntil the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for return to service.
In general, t hese r e g u l a t i ons r e q u i r e t h a t an airworthy certificated a i r c r a f t be i nspec t ed as
p r e s c r i bed i n 14 C.F.R. Part 91, S ubpa r t E (Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, and Alterations), any d i sc r epanc i es be r e pa i r ed and the aircraft be approved for return to service a s prescribed in Part 43 (Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding, and Alterations) and that any work on the ai rcraft be recorded and such records maintained. Petitioner seeks an exemption because, as addressed, the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee sUAS s will operate pursuant to this Petition without airworthiness certification. An equivalent level of safety can be provided instead by requiring, as provided herein, that inspections and maintenance be accomplished according to the inspection, maintenance, and preflight sections IAW the manufacturer’s guidance in the
associated User’s Manual. Among other things, the aircraft will be inspected prior to each flight to confirm that it is in good working order. Any maintenance or repairs will be perform and
l ogged, and, upon any work being performed , the aircraft will be checked and approved for flight by personnel before being returned to service.
The FAA has already set precedence by previously granted exemptions in circumstances similar, in all material r espects, including airframe types, to those presented herein.
J. Conclusion As set forth in the document above, the following summary is provided for publication in the Federal Register. Petitioner seeks an exemption pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA
M odernization and Reform Act of 2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 to permit safe operation of the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly
eBee sUAS commercially, for the purposes of low

- risk, aerial photography and survey, data collection for industrial inspections including pipe line, power lines, wind turbines, solar farms, flare stack, and offshore platforms, and first responder/emergency management

. By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfil ling the Congressional mandate of Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to expedite approval of operations of certain sUAS in the NAS, while also advancing the interests of the public.23

WHEREFORE , in accordance with the Title 49 of the United States Code, the Code of Federal Regulations, and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R. 45.23 (b),1 4 C.F.R. 61.23, 14 C.F.R. 61.101 (e)(4) &(5),14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) and (b), 14 C.F.R. 61.315(a), 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a), 14 C.F.R. 91.105, 14 C.F.R. 91.119(c), 14 C.F.R. 91.121, 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a) (b), 14 C.F.R. 91.405(a), 14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1), 14 C.F.R. 91.40 9(a)(1) and (2), and 14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) and (b).

Respectfully Submitted, 

# Kelly Neubecker
Kelly J. Neubecker CEO UASolutions Group, Inc.

cc: Kevin A. Coward