alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00396-CV

MELCHOR JESUS B. ACOSTA, 

M.D.

APPELLANT

V.

GINA KAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF TAMSEY LYNORA 

MOORE, DECEASED

APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the parties= AJoint Motion To Dismiss,@ requesting 

that we render judgment to effectuate their settlement agreement, abate this 

case until the trial court’s proceedings to effectuate the settlement agreement are 

complete, and remand this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

accordance with the parties’ agreement. It is the court=s opinion that the motion 

should be granted in part and denied in part.2 Accordingly, without regard to the 

merits, we set aside the trial court=s judgment and remand this case to the trial 

court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties= settlement 

agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d); Innovative Office Sys., 

Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995). 

Appellant’s request that this appeal be joined with appellate cause number 

02-11-00365-CV, styled TRISUN Healthcare, LLC d/b/a The Plaza At Mansfield 

v. Gina Kay, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Tamsey Lynora 

Moore, Deceased, is dismissed as moot. All other requested relief is denied.

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. 

DELIVERED: November 3, 2011

 

2

That is, the parties ask us to render judgment effectuating the parties=

agreement and to abate this case until the trial court’s proceedings to effectuate 

this settlement agreement are complete and to remand this case to the trial court 

for rendition of judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), (B), (C). Rule 

42.1(a)(2), however, permits us to render judgment effectuating the parties=

agreement or to set aside the trial court=s judgment and remand the case to the 

trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement or to abate 

the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement; 

we cannot do all three or portions of all three. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), 

(B); see also Cunningham v. Cunningham, No. 02-08-00362-CV, 2008 WL 

5479677, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Oct. 30, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.).
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 22, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00192

- CR & 04

- 19

- 00193

- CR

John Joe AVALOS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CR

- 7068 & 2016

- CR

- 10374

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On August 10, 2020 the Appellant filed a motion for rehearing en banc. The Court

requests the S ta t e file a response on or before October 10, 2020.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of September, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 15


May 3, 2002


Board of Directors
Superior Uniform Group, Inc.
Seminole, Florida

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. for the periods ended March 31,
2002 and 2001, as indicated in our report dated April 24, 2002; because we did
not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 2-85796 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Certified Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2694]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

Federal Highway Administration


Woodrow Wilson Bridge; Potomac River, District of Columbia and 
Prince George's County, MD

AGENCY:  Federal Highway Administration, Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION:  Notice of public hearings; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This document contains corrections to the notice of public 
hearings which was published January 6, 2000 (65 FR 801). The notice 
announced the dates and locations of two public hearings to receive 
information concerning the environmental and navigational impacts of 
the replacement of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge, but the notice did not 
contain the snow dates for these meetings.

DATES:  This correction is effective on February 7, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Mr. John Gerner, Project Manager 
(FHWA), Woodrow Wilson Bridge Center, 1800 Duke Street, Suite 200, 
Alexandria, Virginia 22314 (703 519-9800); Mr. N.E. Mpras, Chief, 
Office of Bridge Administration, Commandant (G-OPT), U.S. Coast Guard, 
2100 Second Street, SW, Washington, DC 20593 (202 267-0368); or Ms. Ann 
Deaton, Chief, Bridge Administration Branch, Fifth Coast Guard 
District, Federal Building, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 
23704-5004 (757 398-6222).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Need for Correction

    The Federal Highway Administration and the Coast Guard published a 
document in the Federal Register of January 6, 2000 (65 FR 801), which 
announced the dates and location of two public hearings to receive 
information concerning the environmental and navigational impacts of 
the replacements of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge. That document failed to 
publish alternative snow dates for these meetings. This document 
corrects that oversight.
    In notice FR Doc. 00-258 published on January 6, 2000 (65 FR 801), 
make the following corrections: On page 801, second column, under 
DATES: correct the first sentence to read ``The hearing will start 7 
p.m. on Tuesday, February 8, (snow date February 15) and Thursday, 
February 10, 2000, (snow date February 16) and display materials will 
be available beginning at 5:30 p.m. on these dates.''

    Dated: February 2, 2000.
Terry M. Cross,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Director of Operations Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-2694 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 15, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 15, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19A0394. IN RE ESTATE OF CHARLES ANTHONY MOORE.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6619

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ROBERTO ANTOINE DARDEN, a/k/a Dizz

- e, a/k/a Javon , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 4:11

- cr - 00052

- AWA

- LRL

- 1 )

Submitted : June 17, 2022 Decided: August 15, 2022

Before DIAZ, THACKER, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Roberto Antoine Darden, Appellant Pro Se. Jacqueline Romy Bechara, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-6619 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/15/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Roberto Antoine Darden seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district court’s prior order denying relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion

. The order i s not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B )

. See generally United
States v. McRae , 793 F.3d 392, 400 & n.7 (4th Cir. 2015) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court ’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is deb atable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude tha t Darden has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Darden’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequ ately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 21-6619 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/15/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-76229) of Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd. of our
report dated February 8, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999
and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the two year period
ended December 31, 1999 and the related schedule, which report appears in the
December 31, 1999 Form 10-K of Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd.

/s/ KPMG
-------------------------

KPMG
Hamilton, Bermuda
March 27, 2000
#### Liezin, Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant.

(No. 27847

Decided March 20, 1940.)

*404
      *Mr. Charles Auerbach,*for appellee.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. E. P. FelJcer,*for appellant.

By the Court.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of paragraph one of the syllabus in *Welsh*v. *Industrial Commission, ante,*387, and *Garner, Gdn.,*v. *B. F. Goodrich Co., ante,*397, this day decided.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Day, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-555-001]

Take notice that on October 6, 2000, Dominion Transmission, Inc. (DTI) (formerly CNG Transmission Corporation) tendered for filing revised sheets to resubmit certain tariff sheets and to correct errors appearing on certain tariff sheets filed on September 22, 2000, in this proceeding. The purpose of the original filing was to reflect DTI's corporate name change which became effective April 11, 2000.

DTI states that copies of the filing have been served on DTI's customers and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing must be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27096 Filed 10-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2923 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require the Secretary 

of the Treasury to disclose certain taxpayer rights in the letter of 

acknowledgment of receipt of an application to be treated as an organization described in section 501(c)(3). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Mr. MARCHANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

the Secretary of the Treasury to disclose certain taxpayer 

rights in the letter of acknowledgment of receipt of an 

application to be treated as an organization described 

in section 501(c)(3). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disclosure of Taxpayer 

5 Rights Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2923 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF TAXPAYER RIGHTS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 508 of the Internal Rev3 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

4 following: 

5 ‘‘(g) DISCLOSURE OF TAXPAYER RIGHTS.—The let6 ter of acknowledgment of receipt of an application to be 

7 treated as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) 

8 shall include a notice of the right under section 7428 to 

9 obtain a declaratory judgment relating to status and clas10 sification as such an organization.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall apply to applications submitted after the 

13 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### WEBB v. STATE.

No. 25863.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 8, 1952.

J. P. Williams, Denver City, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a fine of $100 on a charge of driving on a public highway while intoxicated.

The appeal comes to this court with an attack upon the complaint based on the contention that it does not specifically allege the county in which the driving was *540done, as provided under Article 802 of the Penal Code, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 802.

Upon examining the record it appears to us that the allegation is identical with that fully discussed in Baggett v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 618, 229 S.W.2d 801. In that case the holding of the court was contrary to the contention made for reversal of the instant case. We believe that the affirmance of the Baggett case was in accordance with law and it will be followed in the instant case.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### Aukland, Appellee, *v.*Aukland, Appellant.

(No. 28015

Decided February 14, 1940.)

*397
      *Mr. Horace S. Kerr,*for appellee.

*Mr. Don H. Sclmeemilch,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. *J.,*Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Form 10-Q of Worldwide Biotech & Pharmaceutical Company
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Wenxia Guo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:








(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Wenxia
Guo


Wenxia
Guo


Chief
Executive Officer


May 19,
2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the Florida Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1 p.m. and adjourn at 5 p.m. on Tuesday, November 14, 2000, at the Wyndham Orlando Hotel, 8001 International Drive, Orlando, Florida 32819. The purpose of the meeting is to provide new member orientation and discuss such topics as affirmative action in Florida, the Governor's “One Florida Plan,” immigration, education, and other current civil rights issues. 

Persons desiring additional information or planning a presentation to the Committee should contact Bobby D. Doctor, Director of the Southern Regional Office, 404-562-7000 (TDD 404-562-7004). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, October 11, 2000. 

Lisa M. Kelly, 

Special Assistant to the Staff Director, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 00-26636 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32 (a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Northland Cable Television, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, John
Whetzell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that;

          (1)  The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
               (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
               78m or 78(d)); and

          (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

DATE: 3-30-04

/s/  JOHN S. WHETZELL
     -----------------------------------
     John S. Whetzell
     Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Northland Cable Television, Inc. and will be retained by Northland
Cable Television, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

                                       50
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      In connection with the quarterly report of Tecumseh Products Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Todd
W. Herrick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: May 6, 2005                   BY: /s/  TODD W. HERRICK
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Todd W. Herrick
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer