alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Tandycrafts,
Inc.'s form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             913
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,226
<INVENTORY>                                     36,349
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,346
<PP&E>                                          55,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,351
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,528
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,206
<SALES>                                        119,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,115
<CGS>                                           81,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,404)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (463)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (941)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (5,767)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,708)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.56)


</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00129-CV

KALEB RAY RUSSELL A/K/A KALEB 

RAY SANDERSON, Appellant

V.

ASHTON PAIGE WEAVER, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at 

Law No. 1

of Parker County (CIV-22-0041)

July 7, 2022

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Bo
Chen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report
on Form 10-K of Bodisen Biotech, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Bodisen Biotech,
Inc.




Dated:
      March 31, 2009
            By:
            /s/ Bo ChenBo
      ChenChief
      Executive Officer





I, Junyan
Tong certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report
on Form 10-K of Bodisen Biotech, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Bodisen Biotech,
Inc.




Dated:
      March 31, 2009
            By:
            /s/ Junyan TongJunyan
      TongChief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.3


AWARD
AGREEMENT


 


UNDER THE
ALLIANCE


COMMISSION
SUBSTITUTION PLAN


 


You have been granted an Award under the
Alliance Commission Substitution Plan (the “Plan”), as specified below:


 


Participant (“you”):


 


Projected Amount of Award:


 


Date of Grant:


 


In connection with your grant of the Award,
you and the Company agree as set forth in this agreement (the “Agreement”).  The Plan provides a description of the terms
and conditions governing the Award.  If
there is any inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and the terms of
the Plan, the Plan’s terms completely supersede and replace the conflicting
terms of this Agreement.  All capitalized
terms have the meanings given them in the Plan, unless specifically stated
otherwise in this Agreement.


 


It is expressly understood that the Committee
is authorized to administer, construe, and make all determinations necessary or
appropriate to the administration of the Plan and this Agreement, all of which
shall be binding upon you.  The Committee
is under no obligation to treat you or your Award consistently with the
treatment provided for other participants in the Plan. It is further expressly
understood and agreed by you that:


 


(a)                                  This Agreement does
not confer upon you any right to continuation of employment by a Company, nor
does this Agreement interfere in any way with a Company’s right to terminate
your employment at any time.


 


(b)                                 This Agreement will be
subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations.


 


(c)                                  This Agreement will
be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the state of New
York (without regard to conflict of law provisions).


 


(d)                                 This Agreement and the
Plan constitute the entire understanding between you and the Company regarding
this Award.  Any prior agreements,
commitments or negotiations concerning this Award are superseded.


 


1

















 


This Agreement may be amended only by another written agreement, signed
by both parties.


 


BY SIGNING BELOW, YOU AGREE TO ALL OF THE
TERMS AND CONDITIONS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND IN THE PLAN.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
caused this Agreement to be executed effective as of  .


 


	
   

  	
  Alliance Capital Management L.P.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name: Robert H Joseph, Jr.

  
	
   

  	
  Title: CFO, Senior Vice President

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Participant

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  
					



 


2
#### Gus CHANDLER, Appellant v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 24643.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 31, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of. Austin, for the state.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

It now appears that by special requested charge, the trial court did, in.fact, instruct’ the jury upon the law of aggravated assault and intent to kill.

It was upon the failure to instruct upon these defenses that we ordered a reversal, of the case.

Being in error in the conclusion reached,, the state’s motion for rehearing is granted, • the former opinion granting appellant’s-1 motion for rehearing is withdrawn, and appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.’

Opinion approved by the court.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26997]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-930-1220-EB]


Campground Fees for BLM-Administered Campgrounds in Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Supplementary rules.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is establishing recreation 
use fees for campgrounds that did not have existing supplementary rules 
related to recreation use fees. BLM is also reaffirming existing 
supplementary rules for BLM-administered campgrounds throughout 
Colorado. We are taking this action to authorize the collection of fees 
from those who use the campgrounds. This action has the effect of 
requiring campground users to pay fees for the use of certain 
designated campgrounds.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 20, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tina McDonald, BLM Colorado State 
Office (CO-930), 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215, 
(303) 239-3716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The authority for these Supplementary Rules 
is contained in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 43, Sec. 8365.1-
6, Supplementary Rules. Violation of any supplementary rule by a member 
of the public, except for the provisions of Sec. 8365.1-7, are 
punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or imprisonment not to 
exceed 12 months. (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 43, Sec. 8360.0-
7.)
    Violations of supplementary rules authorized by Sec. 8365.1-7 are 
punishable in the same manner.

Existing BLM Campgrounds in Colorado

    This supplementary rule authorizes the establishment and re-
affirmation of recreation fees at all existing fee campgrounds on BLM 
administered lands in Colorado. The following campgrounds are subject 
to recreation fees:

Gunnison Field Office: Mill Creek, Red Bridge, The Gate
San Juan Field Office: Bradfield Bridge
Royal Gorge Field Office: Shelf Road Recreation sites, Sand Gulch, The 
Banks
Grand Junction Field Office: Mud Springs
Kremmling Field Office: Pumphouse, Radium
Glenwood Springs Field Office: Gypsum, Wolcott
Saguache Field Office: Penitente Canyon
Uncompahgre Field Office: All campsites within the Gunnison Gorge 
National Conservation Area

Dave Strunk,
Deputy State Director, Resource Services (Acting).
[FR Doc. 00-26997 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
Exhibit 32.2

### Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

### As Adopted Pursuant to

### Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

---

In connection with the quarterly report of Pathmark
Stores,  Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended  July 30, 2005,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  Report),
I, Frank G.  Vitrano,  President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the
Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the
information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  represents,  in all  material  respects,
the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A  signed  original  of  this  written  statement
required  by  Section  906,  or  other  document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or
otherwise  adopting the  signature  that appears in typed form within the  electronic
version of this  written  statement  required  by Section  906,  has been  provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |                      | /s/ Frank G. Vitrano                                                   
| | -------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:    Title:Date: | Frank G. VitranoPresident and Chief Financial Officer
September 8, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60972-60973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26307]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-130-1020-XU; GP1-0008]


Notice of Meeting; Resource Advisory Councils; Eastern Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District, Interior.

NOTICE: Notice of the Meeting of the Eastern Washington Advisory 
Council;

[[Page 60973]]

November 2, 2000, in Spokane, Washington.

SUMMARY: A meeting of the Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Council 
will be held on November 2, 2000. The meeting will convene at 9 a.m., 
at the Spokane District Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1103 North 
Fancher Road, Spokane, Washington, 99212-1275. The meeting will adjourn 
upon conclusion of business, but no later than 4 p.m. Public comments 
will be heard from 10 a.m. until 10:30 a.m. If necessary, to 
accommodate all wishing to make public comments, a time limit may be 
placed upon each speaker. At an appropriate time, the meeting will 
adjourn for approximately one hour for lunch. Topics to be discussed 
include welcome of new members, FY2000 accomplishments, FY2001 work 
priorities, and development of the FY2001 meeting schedule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Spokane 
District Office, 1103 N. Fancher Road, Spokane, Washington, 99212; or 
call 509-536-1200.

    Dated: October 6, 2000.
Joseph K. Buesing,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-26307 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
^l^^-t5^jS»c»^X<-» , C V



### CHAMBE RO FCOMMERC E 

# ^OT - OST - QOO^-O-^I I

Jun e 18 , 201 0

- -c; 5 t o 

### Denni s DeVan y Aviatio n & Internationa l Affair s Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Dea r Dennis : O n behal f o f th e PaducahAre aChambe r o f Commerce , than k

yo u for meetin g withour busines s an dcommunit y leader s i n Washingto n D . C , o n Jun e 15-16 , 2010 . Th e Paducah , McCracke n County , an dJackso n Purchas e Regio n striv e t o wor k togethe r a s ateam . W e ar e very prou do f ou r regiona l cooperatio n an das k for you r support o f our priority project s (list s attached) . If th e PaducahChambe r

can eve r b e o f assistanc e t o you , pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t me (270 ) 443-174 6 o r

espalding@paducahchamber.org . Sincerely , 

# ^i^U^ u Elain e Spaldin g Presiden t



## JEAnUCAU 40 1 KENTUCK YAVENU E P.O . BO X 81 0 • PADUCAH , KENTUCK Y42002-081 0 "A^^^^'AWTR''" " 270.443.174 6 • FA X 270.442.915 2 • info@paducahchamber.or g • www.paducahchamber.or g ^ - UNBRI i UDLE D SPIRI T

## Paducah/McCracke n County , Kentuck y 201 0 Agenda : Energ y & th e Environmen t Federa l Prioritie s I . Suppor t

Nuclea r Energ y & Re-Industrializatio n o f PGD PSit e II . Publi c Healt h& Safet y a . PaducahFloo dProtectio n Syste mRepair s b . DO ECleanu p Fund s c . Disaste r

an dEmergenc y Service s Facilit y III . Economi c Developmen t a . Downtow n Riverfron t Developmen t b . Riverport

Wes t Intermoda l Par

k c . Purchas e Are aRegiona l Industria l Par k IV . Transportatio n a . Marin e Industr y ~ suppor t IMT S Capita l Project s Busines s Mode l • Kentuck y Loc k • Olmste dDa m • Paduca h/

McCracke n County Riverport Container-on-Barg e Facilit y b . Barkle y Regiona l Airpor t c . Interstat e Highway s -1-6 6 & 1-6 9 Numbe r On e Stat e Polic y Issue :

• Advocat e for

liftin g th e moratoriu mo n nuclear project s Stat e Fundin g Prioritie s I . Educatio n project s —$2 7 millio n K-1 2 • PaducahMiddl e Schoo l - $ 1 7 mil . Bondin g ( $ 1. 2 mil . i n 2010 ) Pos t Secondar y • WKCT C - Paduca hSchoo l o f Ar t - $ 9 mil . • Murra y Stat e University/Extensio n Campu s - $ 1.7 mil . n . Economi c Developmen t • Riverpor t

Wes t Intermoda l Park

- $ 6 mil . • Purchas e Are aRegiona l Industria l Par k lU . Transportatio n

• Surfac e Road s an dHighwa y Project s IV . Communit y Developmen t

• Rive r Discover y Cente r 6-4-1 0
#### FRANK v. STATE.

No. 22017.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 18, 1942.

Leon D. Lusk, of Houston, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of aggravated assault and assessed a penalty of ninety days in jail.

The procedure appears to be regular. No statement of facts or bills of exception are presented, and there is nothing for this court to review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BRIAN EDWARDS, Appellant,

vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 69822



# FILED APR 2 7 2016

TRACIE K. LNDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By 

### _cAtt 4 J-S.,_ DEPUTY CLERIC 

### ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a purported decision denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Stefany Miley, Judge.

Appellant filed his notice of appeal on January 27, 2016. In his notice of appeal, appellant states that he is appealing from a decision entered on December 18, 2015. The documents before this court do not indicate that any decision was entered in the district court on that date. To the extent that appellant appeals from the order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus entered on July 6, 2015, that order was already appealed in Docket No. 68257, and this court entered an order of affirmance on December 18, 2015.' Because appellant 'To the extent appellant is attempting to appeal from this court's December 18, 2015, order of affirmance in Docket No. 68257, the proper avenue to challenge that decision would have been to file a petition for rehearing in that appeal pursuant to NRAP 40. However, the time to file a petition for rehearing in Docket No. 68257 has now passed and the remittitur has issued in that appeal. 

### See NRAP 40(a)(1); NRAP 41.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 

### e I (o- 1 32?7failed to designate an appealable order, we lack jurisdiction over this

appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Douglas

cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge Brian Edwards Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A (sagjr„) 2
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas S. Smith, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Silver Mines, Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.  The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting for the Registrant and have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within this entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.  The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 12, 2008

By:      /s/ Thomas S. Smith



Thomas S. Smith, President and Director
From: David Putney/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com, ksands@centuryky.com, jvanmatre@centurywv.com, danny.carroll@riotinto.com, 

kisnerj@noralnm.com, John.Reggi@ormet.com, Henk.VanDerMeyden@alcoa.com

Cc: cjohnson@aluminum.org

Date: 05/11/2011 05:36 PM

Subject: Application of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LL standards to PAL facilities during shutdown and/or malfunction periods

Hello all,

Back in CY2010 the PAL industry sector and the EPA were able to resolve issues associated with the 

vacatur of 40 CFR §63.6(f)(1) and §63.6(h)(1) [i.e. the portion of the general provisions which previously 

exempted sources subject to MACT standards from meeting those standards during periods of start-up, 

shutdown, or malfunction (SSM)] for sources subject to MACT standards in 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LL 

(Subpart LL) at PAL reduction facilities during periods of start-up. The concern was due to the relatively 

long start-up periods for PAL reduction facilities. However, to my knowledge, periods of shutdown and/or 

malfunction were not addressed at that time. The purpose of this email is to solicit feedback from the PAL 

industry on any concerns you might have on meeting the applicable Subpart LL MACT standards during 

periods of shutdown and/or malfunction.

Based on earlier conversations I believe that the relatively long averaging periods of the Subpart LL 

MACT standards (compared to the amount of time it would take to shutdown a PAL source during a 

period of shutdown and/or malfunction) would minimize your concerns during periods of shutdown and/or 

malfunction. However, if this is not the case, please let me know. Do any of you have any concern over 

application of the Subpart LL MACT standards during periods of shutdown and/or malfunction? If so, 

please explain your concerns so we can discuss them further.

Thanks,

David Putney, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-2016 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: putney.david@epa.gov