alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles A. Hinrichs, SeniorVice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Charles A. Hinrichs                            |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Charles A. Hinrichs                                |   |
| Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| August 6, 2008                                |   |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc.and will be retained by Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

VOXER, INC. and VOXER IP LLC,

 Plaintiffs, 

vs.

META PLATFORMS, INC. f/k/a 

FACEBOOK, INC. and INSTAGRAM 

LLC, 

 Defendants. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 1:20-cv-00655 [DAE]

ORDER ASSESSING COSTS AND ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“the Report”) 

(Dkt. # 437) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower. After 

reviewing the Report, the Court ADOPTS Judge Hightower’s recommendations 

and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs Voxer, Inc. and Voxer 

IP LLC (“Voxer”) Motion in Support of its Bill of Costs. (Dkt. # 391.) 

Voxer’s motion seeks an award of $229,042.35 as the prevailing party 

in this cause of action.

1

 (See Dkts. ## 382, 391.) Defendants Meta Platforms, Inc. 

f/k/a Facebook, Inc. and Instagram LLC (“Meta”) hereby object to the costs 

1 Initially, Voxer sought an award of $255,190.05. However, following discussions 

and negotiations between the parties, Voxer has agreed to withdraw certain costs 

associated with deposition transcripts, resulting in a final total of $229,041.35.

Case 1:20-cv-00655-DAE Document 440 Filed 10/26/23 Page 1 of 3
2 

associated with deposition transcripts, video depositions, and copying expenses. 

(Dkt. # 398.) In her Report, Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower thoroughly 

analyzed each of the disputed costs. (See Dkt. # 437.) Upon thorough review, 

Judge Hightower recommended that the Court award Voxer a total of $138,004.95

in costs. (Id. at 5) Objections to the Report were due within 14 days after being 

served with a copy. None of the parties in this case filed any objections.

Where, as here, none of the parties objected to the Magistrate 

Judge’s findings, the Court reviews the Report for clear error. United States v. 

Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). After careful consideration, the 

Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report. The Court finds that the Magistrate 

Judge's exclusion regarding Voxer's incidental deposition transcript costs and

Voxer's request for videography costs are all reasonable and absent of clear error.

The Court also finds that the Magistrate Judge’s award of 50% of all Voxer’s 

copying cost is reasonable and absent of clear error. Therefore, the Court 

determines that the Magistrate Judge’s conclusions and recommendations are 

neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Dkt. # 437) as the opinion of the Court, and GRANTS IN 

PART and DENIES IN PART Voxer’s Motion in Support of its Bill of Costs (Dkt. 

# 391). It is ORDERED that Premier be awarded $138,004.95 in costs.

Case 1:20-cv-00655-DAE Document 440 Filed 10/26/23 Page 2 of 3
3 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: Austin, Texas, October 26, 2023. 

______________________________________

David Alan Ezra

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00655-DAE Document 440 Filed 10/26/23 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 32.2**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connect with the quarterly
report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended November 30, 2003 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on
or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

|Date: January 13, 2004 | By: | /s/ Mark V. McDonough                     
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 10.18**

 

 

**200 Milik Street, Carteret, New Jersey 07008**

**(732) 499-3930 • Telecopier (732) 499-6891**

 

November 28, 2006

 

Mr. Kenneth Martindale

Two 14th Street, Apt. 1111

Hoboken, NJ  07030

 

Dear Ken:

 

This letter amends the Employment Agreement dated December 14, 2005 between you and Pathmark Stores, Inc. (the “Agreement”).  The Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except that the following item in the Agreement has been amended as follows:

 

1.            Effective as of November 28, 2006, Section3.(e)(iii) shall be deleted in its entirety and the following inserted in lieu thereof:

 

“(iii)   The Company shall pay or promptly reimburse the reasonable cost of temporary housing for you and your family within commuting distance of the Company’s executive offices in New Jersey.”

 

Please acknowledge your agreement by executing and returning this original signed amendment.

 

|   | Very truly yours,     |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   |                  |
|   | PATHMARK STORES, INC. |
|   |                  |   |
|   |                  |   |
|   | By:                   | /s/ John T. Standley |
|   |                  | John T. Standley |
|   |                  | Chief Executive Officer |

 

Agreed to and accepted

this 28th day of November, 2006.

 

 

| /s/Kenneth Martindale |
|-----------------------|
| Kenneth Martindale    |
**Exhibit 32(ii)**

 

**CERTIFICATION****OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connect with the quarterly report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form10-QSB for the period ended February 29, 2008 to be filed with Securities and ExchangeCommission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodscovered by the Report.

            It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2892 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2892

 To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to preclude law firms 
  and licensed attorneys from the definition of a debt collector when 
                        taking certain actions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2013

 Mr. Perlmutter (for himself and Mr. Bachus) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to preclude law firms 
  and licensed attorneys from the definition of a debt collector when 
                        taking certain actions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Debt Collection Practices 
Technical Clarification Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL PROCEEDING EXCEPTION.

    Section 803(6) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (12 U.S.C. 
1692a(6)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraph (F) as subparagraph (G); 
        and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following:
                    ``(F) any law firm or licensed attorney--
                            ``(i) serving, filing, or conveying formal 
                        legal pleadings, discovery requests, or other 
                        documents pursuant to the applicable rules of 
                        civil procedure; or
                            ``(ii) communicating in, or at the 
                        direction of, a court of law or in depositions 
                        or settlement conferences, in connection with a 
                        pending legal action to collect a debt on 
                        behalf of a client; and''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Form 10-QSB of Worldwide Biotech & Pharmaceutical
      Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Wenxia Guo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.














/s/
      Wenxia Guo


Wenxia
      Guo


Chief
      Executive Officer


August
      1,
      2006





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The electric power sector contributes a third ofthe total US greenhous e gas emis sions
. One-third. I don't get how that number isn't big enough. Is it the hamburger effect? Somehow a quarter pounder seems more immense. Perhaps, it's been awhile since we've all had a math lesson. Now, I don ' t think
. The Count ever covered fractions on Sesame ' s Street, but I can see why he avoided thirds.

- 1/3 of the world's population lack sufficient access to safe drinking water

- l/3 of Americans over 20 are obese -1/3 of Americans have delinquent debt No, the Count never taught thirds , because terrible things happen in thirds. Maybe half could be better? One Half: can't be that threatening, right? Milk comes in half gall ons? Half off clearance items are pretty cool. So- what else comes in halves? Lungs. According to the American Lung Association half of children under 18 experienced an asthma attack. Breathing comes in half! Half! Imagine the Count reviewi ng that. "Now kids, half of my bats can 't breathe" Quite literally wouldn' t fly. Not the bats, not on PBS programming, and certa inly not for real (thankfu ll y still alive) children. I don't know ifyou've ever had an asthma attack. But, that is probably something they have to cover on Sesame Street by now, given it ubiquitous presence among our youth. If yo u aren't familiar allow me to give you a quick primer. Imagine your wind pipe tightening --not j ust one third its size--- but say a 1/8. Your diaphragm is pumping up and down- convulsion desperately trying to get air to your lungs. You are heav ing the best you can, each breath exhausts you, i t 's like drowning on dry land. Wide-eyed and terrified you, you start to knock things over, wave your hands,because if you are lucky to have anyone around to help you, you sure as hell can shout out to them. Your entire body flushes with panic as you mind tries to coax your body into breathing
. I know that feeling all too well. And I am here today, because I don't want that feeling for anyone else, not in America, not on this Earth
. I am sick of people telling me America is the best nation
. America is the world ' s leader. America this. America that. America-needs to quit it, with our self

-glorifying propaganda and actual act as a world leader. And that can start with you. Everyone here before you. Everyone you have listened to over the past two days, we are the people being the statisticsTake action against antiquated industry that is hurting the American people, take action to prevent carbon emissions.
Exhibit 31.2
 WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-K
Year ended December 31, 2008
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   By:
    
    /s/ Cynthia A. Mahl
    
    
    
    Date: March 30, 2009Cynthia A. Mahl, Executive Vice President and CFO
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### AUG 6 2002 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

FRED RAYMOND WALLACE and MARILYN JOYCE WALLACE,

Plaintiffs - Appellants, No. 02-8032
v. ( D.C. No. 01-CV-180-J) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (D. Wyoming)

Defendant - Appellee.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before KELLY , McKAY , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record , this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would notmaterially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without ora l argument. The underlying action from which this appeal stems was filed in state court framed as a quiet title action attacking a lien fil ed by the Internal Revenue Service. Notwithstanding Plaintiffs’ objections, i t was properly removed to-2-

federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442 because it was against federal officers or agencies. After reviewing Plaintiffs’ many pleadings and clai ms, the trial court properly determined that the case was simply an att empt to challenge the validity of federal tax assessments and resulting liens. Th e trial court properly concluded that Plaintiffs had not satisfied the necessary pre requisites to qualify for the limited waiver of federal sovereign immunity provid ed for in tax refund cases by 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1). The trial court was also c orrect in concluding that Plaintiffs could not rely on 26 U.S.C. § 7433(a) be cause they failed to allege exhaustion of administrative remedies. Likewise, i t properly held that 28 U.S.C. § 2410 does not permit a taxpayer to collaterally attack the merits of a tax assessment. The trial court’s final obviously corr ect blow to Plaintiffs’ action was its holding that the case should be dismissed f or lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U. S.C. § 7421, bars injunctive relief as to the collection activities of the Internal Revenue Service. The claims on appeal are various ways of raising th e same claims. Therefore, after full review, we conclude that the trial court’s order dismissing the complaint for lack of jurisdiction and its deni al of a variety of post-judgment-3-

motions are correct. Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Condit ional Petition for Declaratory Relief is denied. The trial court’s judgment of di smissal is AFFIRMED

. Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
```

[Federal Register: October 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 206)]
[Notices]               
[Page 65703]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26oc10-145]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

 
Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending October 2, 2010

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations(See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.).
    The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to 
ModifyScope are set forth below for each application. Following the 
Answer periodDOT may process the application by expedited procedures. 
Such proceduresmay consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a 
tentative order, or inappropriate cases a final order without further 
proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0242.
    Date Filed: September 28, 2010.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope:October 19, 2010.
    Description:
    Application of Compass Airlines, Inc. (``Compass'') requesting the 
Department ofTransportation disclaim jurisdiction over the corporate 
reorganization of Compass inwhich Compass will be converted from a 
Delaware corporation to a Delaware limitedliability company bearing the 
name Compass Airlines, LLC, and immediately thereaftertransfer 
Compass's certificate of public convenience and necessity, exemptions, 
designations,and any related operating authorities to Compass Airlines 
LLC, a Delaware Limited LiabilityCompany.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations,Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-27022 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Registrant
----------
SouthBanc Shares, Inc.

                                            Percentage         Jurisdiction or
  Subsidiaries (a)                         of Ownership     State of Incorporation
----------------------------------------  ---------------   ----------------------
<S>                                       <C>               <C>
Perpetual Bank, A Federal Savings Bank                100%      United States

Heritage Federal Bank                                 100%      United States

United Service Corporation of
 Anderson, Inc.(b)                                    100%      South Carolina

United Investments Services, Inc.(c)                  100%      South Carolina

Mortgage First Service Corporation(b)                 100%      South Carolina

-------------
</TABLE>
(a) The operations of the wholly owned subsidiaries of the Registrant are
    included in the Registrant's Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
    the Annual Report attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
(b) Wholly-owned by Perpetual Bank.
(c) Wholly-owned by United Service Corporation of Anderson, Inc.