alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2965 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow nontaxable employer 

matching contributions to section 529 college savings plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Mr. PITTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow nontaxable employer matching contributions to section 529 

college savings plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Help Kids Save for 

5 College Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NONTAXABLE EMPLOYER MATCHING CONTRIBU7 TIONS TO SECTION 529 COLLEGE SAVINGS 

8 PLANS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap10 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2965 IH

1 items specifically excluded from gross income) is amended 

2 by inserting after section 139D the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 139E. EMPLOYER MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS TO 

4 SECTION 529 COLLEGE SAVINGS PLANS. 

5 ‘‘(a) EXCLUSION.—Gross income of an employee does 

6 not include amounts paid during the taxable year by the 

7 employer to a qualified tuition program for the benefit of 

8 a designated beneficiary if such amounts are paid pursu9 ant to a college savings assistance program. 

10 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—The amount excluded from the 

11 gross income of an employee under subsection (a) for any 

12 taxable year with respect to each designated beneficiary 

13 shall not exceed the lesser of— 

14 ‘‘(1) $1,000, or 

15 ‘‘(2) the amount paid by the employee during 

16 such year to such program for the benefit of such 

17 beneficiary. 

18 ‘‘(c) COLLEGE SAVINGS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.— 

19 For purposes of this section, a college savings assistance 

20 program is a separate written plan of an employer for the 

21 exclusive benefit of such employer’s employees— 

22 ‘‘(1) under which the employer makes payments 

23 to qualfied tuition programs for the benefit of des24 ignated beneficiaries, and 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2965 IH

1 ‘‘(2) which meets requirements similar to the 

2 requirements of paragraphs (2), (3), (5), and (6) of 

3 section 127(b). 

4 ‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section, 

5 terms used is this section which are also used in section 

6 529 shall have the respective meanings given such terms 

7 by section 529.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

9 for such part III is amended by inserting after the item 

10 relating to section 139D the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 139E. Employer matching contributions to section 529 college savings 

plans.’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Page | 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,

LTD. and HUAWEI 

TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00533-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00534-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00535-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00536-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00537-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00538-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00539-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00540-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00541-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00542-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00543-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00544-ADA

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE REGARDING 

DISCLOSURE OF EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s Version 3.2 of the Court’s Order Governing proceedings entered 

November 9, 2020, and in accordance with the Court’s Scheduling Order, Plaintiff hereby notifies 

the Court Plaintiff has disclosed the extrinsic evidence it intends to rely upon concerning claim 

construction on Defendants Huawei Technologies Co., LTD and Huawei Technologies USA Inc. 

via electronic mail on January 15, 2021.

Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 2
Page | 2

DATED: January 15, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Mark D. Siegmund_____ 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered 

electronically via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, 

on this the 15th day of January 2021.

/s/ Mark D. Siegmund

Mark D. Siegmund

Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10319]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, May 4, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-10319 Filed 4-25-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-42-000]

Take notice that on October 11, 2000, Mississippi River Transmission Corporation (MRT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective November 10, 2000:

Third Revised Sheet No. 21

Third Revised Sheet No. 33

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 249

Original Sheet No. 249A

MRT states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect the implementation of non-discriminatory waiver of fuel charges for a transaction on an MRT non-contiguous lateral that does not use fuel.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Davis P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27100  Filed 10-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
      4.3

    


    


    


    


    


    February
      27, 2006

    


    Iroquois
      Capital LP

    641
      Lexington Avenue

    26th
      Floor

    New
      York,
      New York

    USA
      10022

    Attention:         Joshua
      Silverman

    


    


    Dear
      Sirs:

    


    
      	
              Re:

            	
              Generex
                Biotechnology Corporation

              -
                Amendments to
                Warrants

            


    

    


    We
      make
      reference to (a) the common stock purchase warrant issued by Generex
      Biotechnology Corporation (the “Company”)
      to
      Iroquois Capital LP (“Iroquois”)
      on
      October 20, 2005 pursuant to which the Company granted to Iroquois the
      entitlement to purchase up to 609,756 shares of the Company’s common stock at
      $1.20 per share, (b) the common stock purchase warrant issued by the Company
      to
      Iroquois on October 27, 2005 pursuant to which the Company granted to Iroquois
      the entitlement to purchase up to 304,878 shares of the Company’s common stock
      at $1.25 per share, and (c) the common stock purchase warrant issued by the
      Company to Iroquois on January 20, 2006 pursuant to which the Company granted
      to
      Iroquois the entitlement to purchase up to 952,381 shares of the Company’s
      common stock at $1.05 per share (collectively, the “Warrants”).

    


    The
      Initial Exercise Date (as that term is defined in each of the Warrants) of
      each
      of the Warrants is expressed therein as the 181st
      day
      after the date thereof. The Company hereby confirms that, in consideration
      of
      the exercise by Iroquois of not less than 100% of the Warrants and the delivery
      to the Company of Notices of Exercise in respect thereof on or before the close
      of business on February 27, 2006, the Company has agreed to abridge the Initial
      Exercise Dates and to honor the aforementioned Notices of
      Exercise.


    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    


    


    In
      addition, the Company will grant to Iroquois an additional common stock purchase
      warrant pursuant to which the Company will grant to Iroquois the entitlement
      to
      purchase up to 933,508 shares of the Company’s common stock at $3.00 per share
      exercisable for a period of five years from and after August 27,
      2006.

    


    Yours
      truly,

    


    Generex
      Biotechnology Corporation

    


    


    


    /s/
      Mark A. Fletcher                


    Mark
      A.
      Fletcher

    Executive
      Vice-President, General Counsel

    maf:hs
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26838]



[[Page 62716]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2413-040]


Georgia Power Company; Notice of Availability of Draft 
Environmental Assessment

October 13, 2000.
    An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. 
The EA analyzes the environmental impacts of approving Georgia Power 
Company's (licensee for the Wallace Dam Project, FERC No. 2413) request 
to permit the Reynolds Plantation to increase the rate of water 
withdrawal 3 MGD, about 4.6 cubic feet per second (cfs), to 14.125 MGD, 
about 21.9 cfs. No additional construction is required at either site.
    The Reynold plantation would increase the water withdrawal at the 
Rees Jones intake facility from 0.75 million gallons per day (MGD) from 
Lake Oconee to 10.75 MGD. The Reynolds Plantation also would increase 
the rate of water withdrawal at the National Course facility from 0.75 
MGD to 1.875 MGD.
    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Energy Projects, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. In the EA, Commission staff 
conclude that approving the licensee's request to permit the Reynold 
plantation to increase it's water withdrawals from Lake Oconee would 
not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the 
quality of the human environment. Copies of the EA can be viewed on the 
web at www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm. Call (202) 208-2222 for 
assistance. Copies are also available for inspection and reproduction 
at the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street 
NE, Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371.
    Anyone may file comments on the EA. The public, federal and state 
resource agencies are encouraged to provide comments. All written 
comments must be filed within 30 days of the issuance date of this 
notice shown above. Send an original and eight copies of all comments 
marked with the docket number P-2413-040 to: The Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact 
Sean Murphy at telephone: (202) 219-2964.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26838 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

### Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

### As Adopted Pursuant to

### Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

---

In connection with the quarterly report of Pathmark
Stores, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Frank G. Vitrano, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in  all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

| |                      | /s/ Frank G. Vitrano                                                   
| | -------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:    Title:Date: | Frank G. VitranoPresident and Chief Financial Officer
December 10, 2003
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 1, 2019

Order 

Clerk

February 1, 2019

156849(89)

RAFAELI, LLC, and ANDRE OHANESSIAN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

SC: 156849

v COA: 330696

Oakland CC: 2015-147429-CZ

OAKLAND COUNTY and ANDREW MEISNER,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for the temporary admission of out-ofstate attorney Lawrence G. Salzman to appear and practice in this case under MCR 

8.126(A) is GRANTED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

Sublease Agreement

This underlease is dated the 25th day of November 1998 and is made between 
Annuity and Life Reassurance Ltd. having its office at Cumberland House,
1 Victoria St. Hamilton, Bermuda the lessor and Global Markets Access Ltd. 
"Lessee".


Leasehold

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, Lessor subleases to 
Lessee, and Lessee subleases from Lessor, that certain office space located at 
Cumberland House, 1 Victoria Street, Hamilton HM AX, Bermuda. This space shall 
consist of 4 offices and 3 workstations. Each office and workstation shall have 
no less than one 1 functional phone.


Term

The initial term on this sublease shall be from Wednesday November 25, 1998, 
until Thursday December 31, 1998. At any time before December 31, 1998, this 
sublease may be renewed on a month-to-month basis by the consent of both Lessor 
and Lessee.


Rent

Initial term: Lessee shall pay Lessor as rent, for the possession and use of the
Premises, the sum BD$5,200 plus utilities for the initial term as described
above. This rent shall be paid in full on or before December 31, 1998. Rent is
payable at the address of Lessor at Cumberland House, 1 Victoria Street,
Hamilton HM AX, Bermuda.

Month-to-month: Should this sublease continue on a month-to-month basis, Lessee 
shall pay Lessor as rent, for the possession and use of the Premises, the sum 
of BD$4,500 per month plus utilities in advance. Rent is payable at the address 
of Lessor at Cumberland House 1 Victoria Street, Hamilton HM AX, Bermuda.


Use of the Premises

Use and Restrictions on Use: Lessee shall use the premises for general office 
purposes only, and for no other use. Lessee shall not use or allow the Premises 
to be used for a purpose or in a manner that is unlawful, illegal, or likely to 
cause damage to the Premises, to adjourning property, or would cause a nuisance 
to any member of the public or to any other Lessee of the building.

This sublease is executed on this 25th day of November, 1998, in the City of 
Hamilton, Bermuda.


/s/ Lawrence S. Doyle
--------------------------------------
Lawrence S. Doyle
President and Chief Executive Officer
Annuity and Life Reassurance, Ltd.


/s/ Donald J. Matthews
--------------------------------------
Donald J. Matthews
President and Chief Executive Officer
Global Markets Access Ltd.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6788
In Re: RODNEY T. WILLIAMS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-02-648) Submitted: July 9, 2003 Decided: August 11, 2003 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney T. Williams, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rodney T. Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-1159V Filed: February 15, 2017

UNPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * LISA STUFFLE, *

* Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; v. * Influenza (“ Flu”); Shoulder Injury

* Related to Vaccine Administration SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Ronald Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. Jennifer Reynaud, U.S. Department of Ju stice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On October 9, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensat ion Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she received an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 15, 2013, and subsequently suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Offi ce of Special Masters.

On February 14, 2017, respondent filed hi s Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compen sation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent agrees t hat petitioner’s claim satisfies the requirements set forth in Althen v. HHS , 418 F.3d 1274, 1278 (Fed. Cir. 2005), and that her alleged injury was caused- in-fact by a vaccination. Id. at 4. Respondent further

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reaso ned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Cour t of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 agrees that petitioner has satisfied all le gal prerequisites for compensation under the

Vaccine Act. Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master