alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2915 

To amend section 2423 of title 18, United States Code, to eliminate a 

defense, to a criminal prosecution under that section, based on the 

state of mind of the defendant as to the age of the minor engaging 

in, or intended to engage in, a commercial sex act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Mr. COTTON (for himself and Mr. GOWDY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 2423 of title 18, United States Code, 

to eliminate a defense, to a criminal prosecution under 

that section, based on the state of mind of the defendant 

as to the age of the minor engaging in, or intended 

to engage in, a commercial sex act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Children from 

5 Sex Tourism Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2915 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF DEFENSE BASED ON THE DEFEND2 ANT’S STATE OF MIND AS TO THE AGE OF 

3 THE MINOR ENGAGING IN, OR INTENDED TO 

4 ENGAGE IN, A COMMERCIAL SEXUAL ACT. 

5 Subsection (g) of section 2423 of title 18, United 

6 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(g) In a prosecution under this section based on il8 licit sexual conduct, as defined in subsection (f)(2), the 

9 Government need not prove that the defendant knew the 

10 minor engaging in, or intended to engage in, a commercial 

11 sex act had not attained the age of 18 years.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
AAM-11-415-E August 22, 2011

Exemption No. 10337 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0841

Mr. John Tomaino American Helicopters 612 West Kearney Boulevard Fresno, CA 93706

Dear Mr. Tomaino:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated August 3, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of American Helicopters for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if gr anted, would allow American Helicopters, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to American Helicopters.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant American Helicopters an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow American Helicopters, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to

the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of American Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the American Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on August 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00256

- CV

IN RE STEVE MOSHER D /B/A MOSHER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING TRIAL COURT NO. 180, 607

- C

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

The co urt has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus , the

response filed by the real parties in interest, relator’s reply, and the reporter’s

record and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s

petition for writ of mand amus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT , GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DELIVERED: September 17, 2015

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).
**Exhibit 10.28**

 

 

AMENDMENT NUMBER 1

TO

SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment Number 1 to Supplemental Retirement Agreement is made and entered into as of the 25th day of March, 2004, by and between PATHMARK STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Marc A. Strassler (the “Executive”), residing at 10 Georgian Bay Drive, Morganville, New Jersey 07751.

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to the Supplemental Retirement Agreement between the Company and the Executive dated as of June 1, 1994 (the “Agreement”);

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to make certain amendments to the Agreement, as hereinafter set forth;

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

 (1)         Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following Section 1.2A to read as follows:

1.2A    “Applicable Dollar Amount” means $100,000; provided, however, that such amount shall be increased to $150,000 on the earliest to occur of (i) January 1, 2008, (ii) death, (iii) Disability, or (iv) a Change of Control, in each case so long as Executive is employed by the Company on such date.

 (2)         Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following Section 1.5A to read as follows:

1.5A    “Change of Control” means a Change of Control as defined in the Pathmark Stores, Inc. 2000 Employee Equity Plan as amended as of June 13, 2002.

|   | (3) | Section 2.a. of the Agreement is amended to read in its entirety as follows: |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

a.           “Unreduced Supplemental Retirement Benefit” is equal to the sum of 30% of the Executive’s Average Final Compensation after completion of 10 years of Vesting Service, plus 1% of the Executive’s Average Final Compensation multiplied by each additional year of Vesting Service in excess of 10; provided, however, that in no event shall the Executive’s Unreduced Supplemental Retirement Benefit exceed the lesser of (i) 40% of his Average Final Compensation, or (ii) the Applicable Dollar Amount; and

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have caused this Amendment Number 1 to Supplemental Retirement Agreement to be executed effective as of the 25th day of    March, 2004.

 

|                |   | PATHMARK STORES, INC. |
|---------------------|--------|-----------------------|
| ATTEST:             |   |                  |   |
|                |   |                  |   |
| /s/ David C. Cherna |   |                  |   |
| David C. Cherna     |   | By                    | /s/ Eileen R. Scott |
| Secretary           |   |                  | Eileen R. Scott |
|                |   |                  | Chief Executive Officer |
|                |   |                  |   |
|                |   |                  | /s/ Marc A. Strassler |
|                |   |                  | Executive |
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xplore Technologies Corp. (the "Company") for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Philip S. Sassower, as Chief Executive Office of the Company, and Michael J.
Rapisand, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of each such officer's knowledge:



By:

/s/ PHILIP S. SASSOWERPhilip S. SassowerChief Executive OfficerDate: June 9, 2010By:

/s/ MICHAEL J. RAPISANDMichael J. RapisandChief Financial OfficerDate: June 9, 2010


---



QuickLinks
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9456-9457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03526]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD

Meetings

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) plans to hold its regular committee and Board meetings 
in Washington, DC, Monday through Wednesday, March 10-12, 2014 at the 
times and location listed below.

DATES: The schedule of events is as follows:

Monday, March 10, 2014

10:15-11:30 a.m. Ad Hoc Committee Meetings: Closed to public
11:30-Noon Budget Committee
1:30-2:30 p.m. Ad Hoc Committee Meetings: Closed to public
3:00-4:00 p.m. Ad Hoc Committee on Frontier Issues

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

9:30-11:30 a.m. Guest Speaker Presentations
11:30-Noon Technical Programs Committee
1:30-2:00 p.m. Planning and Evaluation Committee
2:00-4:00 Ad Hoc Committee: Closed to Public

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

9:30-11:00 a.m. Board Meeting

ADDRESSES: Meetings will be held at the Access Board Conference Room, 
1331 F Street NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding the 
meetings, please contact David Capozzi, Executive Director, (202) 272-
0010 (voice); (202) 272-0054 (TTY).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the Board meeting scheduled on the 
morning of Wednesday, March 12, 2014, the Access Board will consider 
the following agenda items:

 Approval of the draft January 15, 2014 meeting minutes (vote)
 Ad Hoc Committee Reports: Self-Service Transaction Machines; 
Information and Communications Technologies; Classroom Acoustics; 
Passenger Vessels; Medical Diagnostic Equipment; Accessible Design in 
Education; Public Rights-of-Way and Shared Use Paths; Frontier Issues; 
and Transportation Vehicles
 Budget Committee
 Technical Programs Committee
 Planning and Evaluation Committee
 Election Assistance Commission Report
 Election of Officers
 Executive Director's Report

    All meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. An 
assistive listening system, Communication Access Realtime Translation 
(CART), and sign language interpreters will be available at the Board 
meeting and committee meetings. Persons attending Board meetings are 
requested to refrain from using perfume, cologne, and other fragrances 
for the comfort of other participants (see www.access-board.gov/

[[Page 9457]]

the-board/policies/fragrance-free-environment for more information).

David M. Capozzi,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-03526 Filed 2-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
```
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________
No. 95-30100 Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL NELSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. CR-93-55-A

- - - - - - - - - - November 9, 1995 Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant appeals from his jury convictions for conspiracy to
possess with the intent to distribute cocaine base and two counts

of distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§

841(a)(1) and 846. He argues that the district court erred by

sentencing him to 235 months' imprisonment, that the court abused

its discretion by denying his motions for a new trial, and that his

case should be remanded for resentencing in light of a proposedNo. 95-30100 -2-

amendment to the senten cing guidelines. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the reasons given by

the district court. U nited States v. Nelson
, No. CR-93-55-A (E.D.

La. Dec. 16, 1994); United States v. Nelson , No. CR-93-55-A (E.D.

La. Jan. 25, 1995). Appellant's p r o se motions to strike his

appellate bri ef and to proceed p ro se on appeal are DENIED as
untimely.

AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-27-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-26-2000
<CASH>                                         849,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,675<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    110,611
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,173,783
<PP&E>                                         445,069
<DEPRECIATION>                                 254,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,593,651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          429,865
<BONDS>                                        150,523
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       157,211
<OTHER-SE>                                     776,756<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,593,651
<SALES>                                        819,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               819,062
<CGS>                                          451,330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  451,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,960)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,145)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,815)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 336,312
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   317,497
<EPS-BASIC>                                       6.74<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.68<F4>
<FN>
<F1>Amount represents net accounts receivable.
<F2>Amount includes retained earnings and other comprehensive income.
<F3>Amount includes earnings per common share from discontinued operations of
$7.14.
<F4>Amount includes earnings per common share from discontinued operations of
$7.08.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC,

 Plaintiff 

-vHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., 

LTD., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES 

USA INC. 

 Defendants 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

W-20-CV-00533 

W-20-CV-00534 

W-20-CV-00535 

W-20-CV-00536 

W-20-CV-00537 

W-20-CV-00538 

W-20-CV-00539 

W-20-CV-00540 

W-20-CV-00541 

W-20-CV-00542 

W-20-CV-00543 

W-20-CV-00544 

1

ORDER APPOINTING TECHNICAL ADVISOR 

The Court hereby appoints Dr. Joshua J. Yi to serve as the Technical Advisor for the Court 

in this case. Dr. Yi’s contact information is as follows: 

Dr. Joshua J. Yi 

13492 Research Blvd; Ste. 120 – #445 

Austin, TX 78750-2254 

josh@joshuayipatentlaw.com 

Dr. Yi will assist the Court with technical issues related to the claim construction process 

and advise the Court regarding preliminary and final claim constructions. Because a technical 

advisor serves essentially as a law clerk to the Court and will be familiar with the claim 

construction issues in this case, Dr. Yi may also assist the Court in drafting a claim construction 

order. 

The parties are instructed to mail a paper copy of the claim construction briefs and a USB 

drive with any exhibits and/or technology tutorials to the above address no later than at least 10 

days before the claim construction hearing. 

Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 51 Filed 04/01/21 Page 1 of 2
Finally, depending on the needs of the case, Dr. Yi may also assist the Court with motions 

for summary judgment, Daubert motions, at trial, and with post-trial motions. 

SIGNED this 1st day of April, 2021. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 51 Filed 04/01/21 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of J.Crew Group, Inc. and J.Crew Operating Corp. (collectively, the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended January 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), we, Millard S. Drexler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James S. Scully, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of each of our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: June 13, 2006    
|                       
|/s/ MILLARD S. DREXLER 
|Millard S. Drexler     
|Chief Executive Officer



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/s/ JAMES S. SCULLY                                 
|James S. Scully                                     
|Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63067-63068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27023]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-3457-000]


Badger Generating Company, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

October 17, 2000.
    Badger Generating Company, LLC (Badger) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Badger will engage in wholesale electric power and 
energy transactions at market-basked rates. Badger also requested 
waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, Badger 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by Badger.
    On October 10, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Badger should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Badger is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued

[[Page 63068]]

approval of Badger's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is November 9, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27023 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Ex parte Thomas C. KNIGHT.

No. 24051.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 31, 1948.

Ted Chilcote and Joseph E. Jackson, both of Tyler, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Relator has filed in this court his request, properly acknowledged and sworn to, requesting this court to dismiss his appeal herein.

The request will be granted, and the' appeal is hereby dismissed.