alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.7


                                AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                      TO
                   EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT

      This Amendment No. 1 to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement (this
"Agreement") is made as of the 1st day of April, 2000, by and between Horizon
Offshore, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Bill J. Lam (the
"Employee").

                             W I T N E S S E T H:

      WHEREAS, the Company has entered into an Employment and Non-Competition
Agreement with the Employee dated as of January 1, 1998 (the "Employment
Agreement"); and

      WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee have agreed to certain changes to
the Employment Agreement, effective April 1, 2000, as set forth herein.

      NOW THEREFORE, the Company and the Employee agree as follows:

      Section 1.  AMENDMENTS.

            (a) Paragraph 2(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to
read in its entirety as follows:

      "2. TERM. (a) Subject to the provisions for termination as hereinafter
      provided, Employee's employment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement
      shall be for the period expiring on June 30, 2003. Such period of
      employment is referred to herein as the "Employment Term.""

      Section 2. (b) Paragraph 4 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended
to read in its entirety as follows:

      "4. COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS. The Company will provide or will cause to
      be provided to Employee a minimum annual base salary of $300,000
      appropriately pro rated for periods of less than a full calendar year. The
      Employee shall be entitled to all benefits and perquisites provided to
      similarly situated employees of the Company."

      2. MISCELLANEOUS.

            (a) Except as expressly set forth herein, this Amendment shall not
      by implication or otherwise alter, modify, amend or in any way affect any
      of the terms, conditions, obligations, covenants or agreements contained
      in the Employment Agreement, all of which are ratified

                                       1
<PAGE>
      and affirmed by the Company and the Employee in all respects and shall
      continue in full force and effect.

      (b) This Amendment, including the validity hereof and the rights and
obligations of the parties hereunder, shall be construed in accordance with and
governed by the laws of the State of Texas.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed and signed as of the date indicated above.

                                    HORIZON OFFSHORE, INC.



                                    By:_____________________________
                                             David W. Sharp
                                          Executive Vice President

                                    EMPLOYEE:



                                    _________________________________
                                              Bill J. Lam


                                       2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26569]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel Comparative Medicine.
    Date: October 24, 2000.
    Time: 3 pm to 4 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 
6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Sybil A. Wellstood, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research 
Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7965, 301-435-0814.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 
93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: October 5, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-26569 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Nevada Geothermal Power Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   |                                                                                                                                                                            
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                                   
|2. | The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nevada Geothermal Power Inc.



Date: January 15, 2007

/s/ Don J.A. SmithDon J.A. Smith
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Nevada Geothermal Power Inc. and will be retained by Nevada Geothermal Power Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

MELODY JOY CANTU and

DR. RODRIGO CANTU, 

Plaintiffs

V.

DR. SANDRA GUERRA and

DIGITAL FORENSICS 

CORPORATION, LLC

Defendants

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO 5:20-CV-00746-JKP (HJB)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO QUASH 

SUBPOENAS FOR MEDICAL RECORDS

On this date came on to be considered Plaintiffs’ Motion to Quash Subpoenas for Medical 

Records [Doc. 90] (the “Motion”). Upon due consideration of the Motion and Defendant, Dr. 

Sandra Guerra’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Quash Subpoenas for Medical Records 

[Doc. ___ ], the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED in its entirety. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Quash Subpoenas for Medical 

Records is DENIED in all respects. 

It is so ORDERED.

Dated: ____________________ __________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 93-3 Filed 07/20/22 Page 1 of 1
From: Chuck French [mailto:French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:26 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Ann Johnson; Phil Mulrine; Marinshaw, Richard; Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: Re: RIN 2060

- AQ60

- Chromium RTR

-- Requested Documents

Hi Cortney,

Attached is the surface tension memo. We'll send the other documents soon.

Thanks.

Chuck

Phone: 919

- 541

- 7912

(See attached file: Cr Electroplating Surface Tension Memo_7.5.12.docx)

"Higgins, Cortney"

--- 07/17/2012 0 9:16:30 AM

--- Hi Chuck, I hope you had a good weekend.

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Ann Johnson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/17/2012 09:16 AM

Subject: RIN 2060

- AQ60

- Chromium RTR

-- Requested Documents

Hi Chuck,

I hope you had a good weekend.

Can you please send the following documents referenced in the preamble:

- Development of Revised Surface Tension Limits for Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Tanks

Controlled wit h Wetting Agent Fume Suppressants document (p 18)

- Revised Procedures for Determining Control Costs and Cost Effectiveness for Chromium

E ectroplating and Anodizing (p. 26)

- Responses to Comments (RTC) document (p 26)

- Emissions Reductions and Cost Effectiveness of HEPA Filter Retrofits for Chromium Electroplating,

and Emissions Reductions and Cost Effectiveness of Composite Mesh Pads for Chromium

Electroplating (p 54)

- “cost analysis technical memo” (p 61)

- Procedures for Determining Control Costs and Cost Effectiveness for Chromium Electroplating

Supplemental Proposal memorandum (p 77) (It’s not clear this is the same as the document cited on

page 26).

- Information on non

- PFOS Fume Suppressants in Minnesota Chromium Electroplating Faciliti es

memorandum (p 78)

- Economic Impact Analysis for Risk and Technology Review: Chromium Electroplating (p 97)

- Risk Assessment (and supporting documents)

– can you please provide a redline comparison of the

risk assessment main document compared to t he proposal (not the appendices)? Can you also send

this as a word document.

- EJ or Demographics analysisPlease let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,

Cortney

________________________________________________ Cortney Higgins

Policy Analyst

OMB/OIRA/NRE

202.395.7856

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
#### McDANIEL v. STATE.

No. 22299.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 2, 1942.

Roy A. Scott, of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*139GRAVES, *Judge.*

Appellant was convicted of false imprisonment, and by the jury assessed a fine of $150, from which he appeals.

There are neither bills of exceptions nor statement of facts in the record. The sole question presented to us is the sufficiency of the complaint and information.

Art. 1169 of the Penal Code reads as follows: “False imprisonment is the wilful detention of another against his consent and where it is not expressly authorized by law, whether such detention be effected by an assault, by actual violence to the person, by threats or by any other means which restrains the party so detained from removing from one place to another as he may see proper.”

The complaint and information allege that: “* * * one Robert Lee McDaniel did then and there willfully and without authority of law, and against the consent of Martha Heil, detain the said Martha Pleil by means of refusing to stop the motor vehicle which the said Robert Lee McDaniel was driving and in which the said Martha Heil was riding and by driving said motor vehicle at such a rate of speed that it would endanger the life of the said Martha Heil to alight from said vehicle, thereby restraining the said Martha Heil from removing from one place to another as she might see proper.”

It is contended that such a charge evidences no violation of the law, and that therefore the information and complaint should be quashed. We do not agree with this contention.

In the case of Matterson v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 250, 152 S.W.2d 352, 354, the ■ accused .was riding in a truck with the deceased, and when the same was stopped she attempted to get out and the deceased grasped her by the arm and refused to allow her to alight until she promised not to tell what happened “the other night”. Upon the accused’s refusal to make such promise the deceased still held accused’s arm, whereupon she shot him, so she testified, to relieve herself from such detention. We held therein that: “We are of the opinion that appellant’s testimony was sufficient to raise the issue of an illegal restraint on the part of the deceased which entitled her to an appropriate instruction from the court upon the law of her legal right to resort to such means as appeared to her at the time to be reasonably necessary to extricate herself from such restraint, if any, taking into consideration the age, size and relative strength of the parties.”

We are of the opinion that the complaint and information contain sufficient allegations to evidence an unlawful detention of Martha Heil, and that they therefore allege a false imprisonment as defined by Art. 1169, P. C.

Thus believing, and this being the only question here presented, the judgment is affirmed.
09!1012009 16 :02 2872872814 MAINE:DEP PAGE 82 

SEP-i0-20e5 09 :24 12072676545 P.002/002 

Rule-Making Cover Sheet 

TO : Secretary of State 

ATTN: Administrative Procedure Officer 

State House Station 10'I, Augusta, Maine 04333 

1 . Agency: Department of rEnvironmental Protection 

2. Agency umbrella and unit number: 06-09G 

3. Title of rule: Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt 

4. Chapter number assigned to the rule: 131 

(prior t0 LegISLpdvQ review) 

S. Date(s)lmethod(s) of notice: On May 16, 2009 in the Kennebec Journal and 

on May 27, 2009 in the liennebce Journal, Portland Press Herald, Bangor Daily 

News, Lewiskon Sun Journal and Waternrille Moming Sentinel. 

G. Uate(s)Iplace(s) of hearing(s): June 18, 2009 9:00 AM 

Holiday Inn/Ground Round 

Augusta, Maine 

7. Type: _ - new rule X partial amendment(s) of existing rule 

-suspension of existing rule repeal of rule _emergency rule 

_ repeal and replace: complete replacement of existing chapter, with 

former version simultaneously repealed. 

8. Namelphone of agency contact person : Carolyn Wheeler (207) 287-2437 

5. if a major substantive rule under Title S, c. 375, sub-CII-A, check one of the 

following : 

L] Provisional adoption 11 Final adoption 

Emergency adoption of major-substantive rule 

10. Certification Statemen 

true copy of the rul 

Environmental 

Signatu 

P. Littell, hereby certifjr that th 

ove and lawfully adopt 

iugust 20, 2009. 

~.~ ~~t 1'1c'~ .f 

~Y1ni 

Prirtted name 8 title : David P. LittEll, Commissioner 

7~1, Approved as to form and legality by the Attorney General on _fkol? 

(date) Signature: _ 141.A~ /V 

(aiglnal sigrnOtuFa, pprsonally signed by !he hpad of agenoy) 

'Printed name & title : S~'~~~ ~ ~ Rti J 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE 

AUGUSTA, MAINE 

TOTAL P.002
Slip Op. 03 - 109



## UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

____________________________________ AMERI CAN SI

LICON TECHNOLOG

IES, : ELKEM METAL S COMPANY, : GLOBE METAL

LURGI CAL, I

NC. and : SKW METALS & AL

LOYS, I NC., :

: Plaintiff s, :

: v. : Before: MUS GRAVE, JUDGE : UNITED STATES : Consolidated Court No. 97-02-00267 : Defend ant, :

: and : : COMPANHI

A BRASI LEI RA : CARBURETO DE CALCIO, : COMPANHIA FERROL IGAS : MINAS GERI

AS-MINASLIGAS and : RIMA I NDUSTRIAL

S/A, :

: Defend ant-I nterven ors. : ____________________________________: ORDER
Inview of the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Fe deral Circuit, American S ilic on Technologies v. United States , 3 34 F. 3d 10 33 (F ed . C ir . 2 00 3) , i t i s h er eb y ORDERED that, the Depa rtment of Commerce ’s Remand R esultsare remanded again for a determination consistent with the appellate decision; and it is further
ORDERED that

Commerce s hall have 90 day s to submit its remand determination. The parties shall then

have 30 d

ay s to submit c omm ent s on the remand determination. Any rebuttal comments shall be submitted within 15 days thereaf ter.

__________________________________________

R. KENTON MUSGRAVE, JUDGE Dated: August 25, 2003 New York, New York
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN TCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000096903
<NAME> TCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               7
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      274
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          12,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         14,491
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              232
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,305
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,554
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,482
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (353)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (93)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (260)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (260)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
  4.19

AMENDMENT AGREEMENT TO
GEOTHERMAL OPTION AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT dated for reference the 12th day of January, 2005. BETWEEN:

NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER INC. (NGP) and NORAMEX CORP.("Noramex"), both of 900 - 409 Granville Street, Vancouver, BC, V6C 1T2;

AND:

INOVISION SOLUTIONS INC. ("ISI"),of 304 - 850 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 231;

(the Purchaser)

WHEREAS:

A.

NGP, Noramex and ISI entered into an Option Agreement dated October 12, 2004, (the Agreement) whereby ISI was granted the option to earn a 50% interest in certain geothermal leases located in Humboldt County, Nevada, commonly known as the Pumpernickel Property;



B.

ISI is in default of section 3.8 of the Agreement (the Default); and



C.

The parties wish to amend the terms of the Agreement in the manner set forth below. The parties to this Amendment Agreement therefore agree:





1.

NGP hereby agrees to waive the Default and grant a three month extension for ISI to obtain Exchange acceptance to the Agreement, provided that:

(a)

the initial $10,000 payment due under subsection 3.2 (a) (i) of the Agreement is made by ISI to NGP by the close of business on January 15, 2005; and

(b)

the dates from which all of the cash payment, work commitment and share issuance obligations of ISI are determined in section 3.2 of the Agreement shall be December 15, 2004, unless otherwise indicated herein.

2.

That sub-section 1.1 (g) of the Agreement is amended to delete the words the date of Exchange acceptance for this Agreement and insert in their place the words December 15, 2004.

3.

That sub-section 3.2 (a) (i) of the Agreement is amended to delete the words the Option Date and insert in their place the words or before January 15, 2005.

4.

That sub-section 3,2 (c) (i) of the Agreement is amended to delete the words Option Date and insert in their place the words "date of Exchange acceptance for this Agreement.

5.

That section 3.8 of the Agreement is amended to delete the words December 15, 2004 and insert in their place the words March 15, 2005.

6.

That except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement is hereby ratified, approved and confirmed to be in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Amendment Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER INC.By:Authorized SignatoryNORAMEX CORP.By:Authorized SignatoryINOVISION SOLUTIONS INC.By:Authorized Signatory
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26730]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,100]


Farah/Savane Intl., El Paso, TX; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on September 18, 2000 in response to a petition filed on 
behalf of workers at Farah/Savane Intl., El Paso, Texas.
    The petitioning group of workers is subject to an ongoing 
investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued (TA-W-
37,999). Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve 
no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 25th day of September, 2000.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-26730 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
## BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT, AT HOUSTON

No. 14

- 14

- 00294

- CV

City of Galveston, Dorothy Palumbo, City Attorney and Sterling W. Patrick, Director of Grants and Housing

v.

CDM Smith, Inc.

(No. 13

- CV

- 0844 IN 56TH DISTRIC T C OURT OF GALVESTON CO UNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

SUPP CLK RECORD

CLK RECORD

RPT RECORD

STATEWIDE EFILING

FILING $10.00

$15.00

$15.00

$10.00

$10.00

$66.00

$779.00

$144.00

$20.00

$175.00 05/06/2015

05/06/2015

04/15/2015

12/17/2014

11/24/2014

05/05/2014

04/29/2014

04/28/2014

04/23/2014

04/23/2014 E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

E

- P AID

E

- PAID ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

APE

ANT

ANT



### The costs incurred on appeal to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals Housto n, Texas

are $ 1

, 2 44 .00

.

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, CHRISTOPH ER A. PRINE, CLERK OF THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

### FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and pa yments, in the

above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT

OF APPEALS for the Fo urteenth District of Texas, December 11, 2015

.