alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
2-74613 on Form S-16 and No. 33-66474 on Form S-8 of EnergySouth, Inc. (the
"Company"), as successor to Mobile Gas Service Corporation, and No. 333-02271 on
Form S-3 of the Company, of our report dated October 29, 1999, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 30, 1999.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
December 29, 1999
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a,

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT

Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00571-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00572-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00573-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00575-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00576-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00579-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00580-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00583-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00584-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00585-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE 

ORDER REQURING WITHDRAWAL OF SUBPOENAS 

AGAINST NONPARTIES BP FUNDING AND TERRIER SSC

This Court, having considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order Requiring 

Withdrawal of Subpoenas Against Nonparties BP Funding and Terrier SSC (the “Motion”), hereby 

ORDERS the following:

The Motion is GRANTED. Defendant Google LLC is hereby ORDERED to withdraw its 

subpoenas to BP Funding and Terrier SSC, as well as its motions to compel against those entities

in the following civil actions: Google, LLC v. Terrier SSC, LLC, C.A. No. 21-mc-419-MN (D. 

Del.) and Google, LLC v. BP Funding Trust, C.A. No. 21-mc-440-MN (D. Del.).

SIGNED this _____ day of October 2021.

____________________________________

HONORABLE ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 61-8 Filed 10/20/21 Page 1 of 1
7/8/2015 Request for Information ­ Ruben E Carlos (FAA­2015­1404)

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABFvqQJAFf5SI8crGhIsEIyBwD3qfMUO7BCQ74YBi9P12... 1/1

Request for Information ­ Ruben E Carlos (FAA­2015­1404)

9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions (FAA)

Sent:Wednesday, July 08, 2015 3:13 PM

To: Ruben.E.Carlos@gmail.com

Dear Mr. Carlos:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA­2015­1404).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove

closed‐set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested

response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want

us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 7/22/15. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267­4264.

Sincerely,

Dan Ngo

FAA Office of Rulemaking
SERVED AUGUST 31, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v'S f rWSrinllQ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS """" ' ^^^tHAIIUNb 

WASHINGTON, DC 2010 SEP - I P |: 3M 

IN THE MATTER OF 

COMLUX AVIATION SERVICES, LLC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10GL0003 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0317 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter referred to as "Complainant") filed a 

Complaint dated April 20, 2010. Comlux (hereinafter referred to as "Respondent") filed an Answer 

dated June 15,2010. 

Respondent filed a Request to withdraw Request for Hearing dated August 25, 2010. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may 

withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent of 

the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party 

withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss 

the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Request to Withdraw Request for Hearing having been read 

and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Request to Withdraw Request for Hearing be and is hereby granted; and 

This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

joodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachments - Service List 
FAA DOCKET NO. CP10GL0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Mark A. Nelson, Vice President 

Comlux Aviation Services, LLC, Respondent 

Formerly, Comlux Completion USA 

2640 S. Cargo Drive 

Indianapolis, IN 46241 

TEL: 317-472-7370 

FAX: 317-472-7389 

Chris G, Zurales, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 

TEL: 847-294-7713 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

•The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2823 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and 

the Secretary of Energy to conduct a fuel system requirements harmonization study, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2013 

Mr. TERRY (for himself, Mr. LATTA, and Mrs. WALORSKI) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Secretary of Energy to conduct 

a fuel system requirements harmonization study, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gas Accessibility and 

5 Stabilization Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY. 

7 Section 211(c)(4)(C) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 7545(c)(4)(C)) is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2823 IH

1 (1) in clause (ii)(II), by inserting ‘‘a problem 

2 with distribution or delivery equipment that is nec3 essary for the transportation or delivery of fuel or 

4 fuel additives,’’ after ‘‘equipment failure,’’; 

5 (2) in clause (iii)(II), by inserting ‘‘(except that 

6 the Administrator may extend the effectiveness of a 

7 waiver for more than 20 days if the Administrator 

8 determines that the conditions under clause (ii) sup9 porting a waiver determination will exist for more 

10 than 20 days)’’ before the semicolon at the end; 

11 (3) by redesignating the second clause (v) (re12 lating to the authority of the Administrator to ap13 prove certain State implementation plans) as clause 

14 (vi); and 

15 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(vii) PRESUMPTIVE APPROVAL.—Notwithstanding 

17 any other provision of this subparagraph, if the Adminis18 trator does not approve or deny a request for a waiver 

19 under this subparagraph within 3 days after receipt of the 

20 request, the request shall be considered to be approved as 

21 received by the Administrator and the applicable fuel 

22 standards shall be waived for the period of time re23 quested.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2823 IH

1 SEC. 3. FUEL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS HARMONIZATION 

2 STUDY. 

3 Section 1509 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub4 lic Law 109–58; 119 Stat. 1083) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting 

7 ‘‘biofuels,’’ after ‘‘oxygenated fuel,’’; and 

8 (B) in paragraph (2)(G), by striking ‘‘Tier 

9 II’’ and inserting ‘‘Tier III’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘2014’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.B
 
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Sult, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ John R. SultJohn R. SultExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyAugust 6, 2010
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and will be retained by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2008-0288 Directorate ID: 2006-SW-25-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., Model 214B, 214B-1, 214ST Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 12 Model 214B/B-1 and 24 Model 214ST Helicopters

in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent failure of the spindle and subsequent loss 

of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $39,806 for both spindles for a Model 214B or 214B-1

$40,802 for both spindles for a Model 214ST

Labor per Helicopter

(1 work-hour x $85/workhour for the recordkeeping)

(24 work-hour x $85/workhour for the replacement)

$85

$2,040

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter

(recordkeeping & replacement)

$41,931 for a Model 214B or 214B-1

$42,927 for a Model 214ST

Total US Fleet Cost $3,060 for recordkeeping

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Martin Crane
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27116]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date:  10 a.m., Wednesday, October 25, 2000.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20551.

Status:  Closed.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information:  Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information:  You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: October 18, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-27116 Filed 10-18-00; 11:00 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 10.11


 


Explanatory Note: This document has been translated
from the Chinese-language original for reference purposes only. While this English translation is believed to be generally accurate, it
is subject to, and qualified by, in its entirety, the Chinese-language original. Such Chinese-language original shall be the controlling
document for all purposes.


 


Purchase Advance Payment Contract


 


Party A (payer): Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party B (Payee): Huasheng Farmers Professional Cooperative of Shucheng
County


 


Party B is Party A’s raw material supplier. In order to reduce
operating costs and enhance the partnership between the two parties, Party A agrees to prepay certain prices for the purchase of corresponding
raw materials for Party B’s obligation to provide Party A with Camellia seeds. After full negotiation by both parties, the following
contracts have been concluded:


 


1. Purpose of advance payment: Party B can only use the advance payment
paid by Party A to purchase camellia seed raw materials, and shall not use it for other purposes.


 


2. Prepaid amount: RMB 12,000,000


 


3. As Party B’s business scope also involves Camellia seed oil,
Party A may also provide Party B with Camellia seed oil of the same value as the advance payment to offset the advance payment. The price
of Camellia seed oil shall be in accordance with Party A’s regulations.


 


4. Repayment method: Party B will deduct the advance payment in the
form of Camellia seeds or equivalent currency to Party A. The repayment period shall not exceed twelve months per year, and special circumstances
shall be negotiated separately.


 


5. Party B promises to provide Party A with Camellia Seeds at a price
that is 2% lower than the actual price of Camellia Seeds on the actual delivery date. After the prepayment is deducted, the settlement
will be based on the actual market price.


 


6. If Party B fails to use the advance payment as required by the agreement,
Party A has the right to recover the advance payment and impose a penalty interest of three thousandths per day for the breached part.


 


7. For matters not covered, the two parties can negotiate and conclude
a supplementary contract. The supplementary contract has the same legal effect as this contract. Any party who fails to negotiate can
bring a lawsuit to the people's court in China.


 


8. This contract is valid for one year, and it will automatically terminate
when it expires.


 


9. This contract has two copies, with each party holding one copy,
and it will take effect from the date of signing.


 


/s/ Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party A: Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Date: May 7, 2020


 


/s/ Anhui Yami Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd.


Party B: Huasheng Farmers Professional Cooperative of Shucheng County


Date: May 7, 2020
Exhibit D

Case 6:20-cv-00544-ADA Document 31-4 Filed 10/30/20 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., 

LTD. and HUAWEI 

TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00533-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00534-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00535-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00536-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00537-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00538-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00539-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00540-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00541-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00542-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00543-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00544-ADA

[DRAFT] MARKMAN PROCEDURE

Pursuant to the Court’s Order Governing Proceedings, and the limits on the number of claim 

terms to be construed and page limits for Markman briefs contained therein, the following 

grouping of the twelve cases and the patents asserted therein will apply for purposes of the 

Markman proceedings, as if the groups below were individual cases:

 Group 1:

The -537 and -539 cases;

 Group 2:

The -541 and -544 cases;

 Group 3:

The -540, -543, -533, and -535 cases;

 Group 4

The -534, -538, -536, and -542 cases.

Case 6:20-cv-00544-ADA Document 31-4 Filed 10/30/20 Page 2 of 2
#### DANIELS v. STATE.

No. 26710.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 20, 1954.

No attorney on appeal.

David Moore, Criminal Dist. Atty., Paul J. McClung, Asst. Criminal Dist. Atty., Longview, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Appellant, an employee of a dress shop in the city of Kilgore, was seen to leave the shop, cross the street, get into an automobile, and place something in the glove compartment thereof. Upon examination, the glove compartment revealed a lady’s dress, ■of the value of $35, which had been taken from the store. Upon being questioned, appellant admitted having stolen the dress.

Upon this testimony, appellant was convicted, of misdemeanor theft, with punishment’assessed at a fine of $50 and thirty days in jail.

No bills of exception appear.

1⁄8' By'-motion, "appellant'challenged- the jury panel, alleging ifregularities’in-thé'selection and summoning of the jurors for the week.

The allegation that the jurors had not been drawn and listed by the clerk' in open -court passed out of the -case when the trial court stopped- the proceedings and had. the clerk draw, the list as appellant insisted,-it should -be drawn.

The other contentions are deemed not before us, because there is no showing that the jury which tried the case and rendered the verdict was selected from the claimed defective'list of jurors. '

■ No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,585
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     70,186
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               152,885
<PP&E>                                          61,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 218,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,659
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,365
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   218,780
<SALES>                                         40,392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,392
<CGS>                                           38,817
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,440
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,989)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,989)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,996)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,665)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.11)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Swank, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), the undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 10 , 2004 |  | /s/ John Tulin                          
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                        |  |                                         
|                        |  | John Tulin, President                   
|                        |  | (Chief Executive Officer)               
|                        |  |                                         
|                        |  |                                         
|Dated:  August 10, 2004 |  | /s/ Jerold R. Kassner                   
|                        |  |                                         
|                        |  | Jerold R. Kassner, Senior Vice President
|                        |  | and Treasurer                           
|                        |  | (Chief Financial Officer)               



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Swank, Inc. and will be retained by Swank, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.