1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

PARKERVISION, INC.,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00562-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

SCHEDULING ORDER

In an attempt to narrow the issues in this above-captioned case (the “-562 

Case”) and the related action, ParkerVision v. Intel, 6:20-CV-00108-ADA (the “-108 

Case”), the parties met and conferred, and agreed to reduce the number of patentsat-issue in the two actions and proceed with two trials, the first trial involving Intel’s 

accused cellular products and the second trial involving Intel’s accused Bluetooth 

and Wi-Fi chips. This present motion and proposed schedule address the parties’ 

second trial. As indicated in the proposed schedule below, the parties’ second trial 

would proceed in the above-captioned case against Intel’s accused Wi-Fi and 

Bluetooth products and will include claims from the following patents: 6,580,902; 

9,246,736; 9,118,528; 8,588,725; 9,444,673; and 7,539,474, and 7,050,508. U.S. Patent 

Nos. 6,049,706, 6,266,518, 7,110,444, 8,109,108, and 8,660,513 are hereby dismissed 

with prejudice. 

Case 6:20-cv-00562-ADA Document 111 Filed 01/24/23 Page 1 of 4
2 

Accordingly, in view of the parties’ agreement to narrow the issues in the 

pending two actions between them, Plaintiff ParkerVision Inc. and Defendant Intel 

Corporation jointly move to modify the schedule up to and including the trial of this 

matter as follows:

Proposed 

Deadline

Event

108/562 Cases – Second Trial1

Accused Wi-Fi and Bluetooth products

 (U.S. Patent No. 6,580,902; 9,246,736; 9,118,528; 8,588,725; 9,444,673; and 

7,539,474, and 7,050,5082) 

3/24/2023 Deadline to serve Final Infringement Contentions. After this date, leave 

of Court is required for any amendment to Final Infringement 

Contentions. 

4/28/2023 Deadline to serve Final Invalidity Contentions. After this date, leave of 

Court is required for any amendment to Final Invalidity Contentions.

6/9/2023 Deadline for ParkerVision to select no more than 16 asserted claims

6/16/2023 Close of Fact Discovery

1 The parties have agreed and hereby stipulate to the following regarding claims and defenses at the 

Second Trial. Subject to the Court’s rulings on claim narrowing, ParkerVision may assert any claims that 

have been preserved in its Final Infringement Contentions and expert reports for the Second Trial, 

provided that any such claim was not invalidated at the First Trial. For any claim that ParkerVision 

asserted at the First Trial, Intel may assert as part of a § 102 or § 103 invalidity argument any prior art 

reference disclosed in its Invalidity Contentions and expert reports for the Second Trial, that was not used 

as a § 102 or § 103 reference at the First Trial, and present any theory that a claim term is indefinite, not 

enabled, or lacks written description under § 112 unless that identical theory was presented at the First 

Trial with respect to that claim and the claim was not determined to be invalid in a final judgment. For 

any claim that ParkerVision did not assert at the First Trial, Intel may present any invalidity theory 

preserved in its Final Invalidity Contentions and expert reports for the Second Trial. For the avoidance of 

doubt, Intel shall not be precluded from offering at the Second Trial any evidence relating to prior 

independent development, motivation to combine, and/or the background state of the art, even if similar, 

or identical evidence was presented at the First Trial.

2 The parties have agreed and hereby stipulate that the Court’s claim constructions from the -108 Case 

apply to the -562 Case for patents that are asserted in both cases and/or at both trials.

Case 6:20-cv-00562-ADA Document 111 Filed 01/24/23 Page 2 of 4
3 

7/14/2023 Opening Expert Reports

8/25/2023 Rebuttal Expert Reports

9/22/2023 Close of Expert Discovery 

9/29/2023 Deadline for ParkerVision to select no more than 10 asserted claims for 

trial. 

10/20/2023 Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert motion deadline. 

See General Issues Note #9 regarding providing copies of the briefing to 

the Court and the technical adviser (if appointed).

1/17/2023 Responses to dispositive motions and Daubert motions due. (See Rule 

CV-7.D.2.)

12/1/2023 Replies in support of dispositive motions and Daubert motions due. (See

Rule CV-7.E.2 

12/15/2023 Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions, exhibits lists, witness lists, 

discovery and deposition designations) 

1/5/2024 Serve objections to pretrial disclosures/rebuttal disclosures.

1/19/2024 Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures and File Motions in Limine. 

Parties to jointly email the Court’s law clerk (See OGP at 1) to confirm 

their pretrial conference and trial dates.

1/26/2024 File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions (jury instructions, 

exhibits lists, witness lists, discovery and deposition designations); file 

oppositions to motions in limine.

1/26/2024 File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time Reporting. If a 

daily transcript or real time reporting of court proceedings is requested 

for trial, the party or parties making said request shall file a notice with 

the Court and e mail the Court Reporter, Kristie Davis at 

kmdaviscsr@yahoo.com 

Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining objections and 

disputes on motions in limine. 

2/9/2024 File joint notice identifying remaining objections to pretrial disclosures 

and disputes on motions in limine. 

Case 6:20-cv-00562-ADA Document 111 Filed 01/24/23 Page 3 of 4
4 

2/12/2024 Final Pretrial Conference

3/4/2024 Jury Selection/Trial 

SIGNED this 24th day of January, 2023. 

Case 6:20-cv-00562-ADA Document 111 Filed 01/24/23 Page 4 of 4