alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26860]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel Innovative Technologies for the Molecular Analyses of Cancer 
and their Applications.
    Date: November 8-10, 2000.
    Time: 7:00 PM to 5:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Gaithersburg Hilton Hotel, 620 Perry Parkway, 
Gaithersburg, MD 20877.
    Contact Person: Sherwood Githens, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer 
Institute, Special Review, Referral and Resources Branch, 6116 
Executive Boulevard, Room 8068, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1822.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 11, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-26860 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
---

Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION  1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Strateco  Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,  2009 (the “Report”), We, Guy Hébert, President and Chief Executive Officer and  Ingrid Martin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18  U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



March 16, 2010

/s/ Guy Hébert
__________________
Guy   Hébert 
President and Chief Executive Officer



March 16, 2010

/s/ Ingrid Martin,
__________________
Ingrid Martin, CA
Chief Financial Officer

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 27, 2013

NO. 03

- 12

- 00661

- CV

Noel D. Ischy, Appellant

v.

M.P. McCammon; McCammon Oil & Gas, Inc.; Nosivad Oil, Inc.; Van Davison;

Dawn Davison; Tejon Exp loration; Doralex Energy, Inc.; Mansefeldt Investment Corp.; Fred Harendt; Debbie Harendt; Leffel’s Inc.; William R. Guffey; Jimmy Davison;

Annette Davison; Topaz Exploration Company; Phillip W. Davison; Becky Davison; Tonopah Energy, L.L.C.; O.H.B., Inc.; Eileen Pratt; Dustin Pratt, J.W. King; and George Alexander, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF CONCHO COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON AGREED MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS DAY came on to be submitted to this Court the parties ’ agreed motion to dismiss the

appeal in the above cause, and the Court having fully considered said motion, and being of the

opinion that same should be granted: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered

that said motion is granted, and that the appeal is dismissed. It is FURTHER ordered that each

party shall p ay the costs of appeal incurred by that party , both in this Court and the court below;

and that this decision be certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM TECH SYM'S 3RD QUARTER 1997 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,045
<SECURITIES>                                     5,802
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     93,714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               248,480
<PP&E>                                          45,553
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 328,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,566
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           798
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   328,322
<SALES>                                        216,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          150,480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  209,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,954
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,236)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,718
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: May 21, 2015 519576 

________________________________

In the Matter of ROBERT LOGAN, 

Petitioner, 

v

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting 

Commissioner of Corrections 

and Community Supervision, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: March 31, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________

Robert Logan, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H.

Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington

County) to review a determination of respondent which found

petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding

challenging a tier III determination finding him guilty of

violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney

General has advised this Court that the determination has been

administratively reversed, all references thereto have been

expunged from petitioner's institutional record, and the

mandatory $5 surcharge has been ordered refunded to petitioner's

inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has

received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is

dismissed as moot (see Matter of Shepherd v Fischer, 122 AD3d
-2- 519576 

1229, 1229 [2014]). 

Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without

costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

###### [Notice (00-128)] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Prospective Patent License. 

# SUMMARY:

NASA hereby gives notice that Cyrospace Technologies, of Houston, Texas has applied for an exclusive license to practice the inventions disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,651,079 and 5,963,683 both entitled “Photonic Switching Devices Using Light Bullets” which are assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to the prospective grant of a license should be sent to Ames Research Center. 

# DATES:

Response to this notice must be received on or before December 19, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rob Padilla, Patent Counsel, NASA Ames Research Center, Mail Stop 202A-3, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, telephone (650) 604-5104. 

Dated: October 13, 2000. 

Edward A. Frankle, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 00-26977 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-KSB
Year ended December 31, 2005
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
  [This paragraph intentionally left blank.]
   5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   By:
    
    /s/ Edward J. McKeon
    
    Date: March 24, 2006Edward J. McKeon, President and CEO
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Drew A. Moyer, Principal Financial Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 26,
      2004 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2)   information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Technitrol, Inc.

Dated: April 27, 2004


                                        /s/ Drew A. Moyer
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Drew A. Moyer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be
retained by Technitrol, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered as filed
as part of the Form 10-Q.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Bo
Chen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report
on Form 10-K/A of Bodisen Biotech, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Bodisen Biotech,
Inc.




Dated:
      October 27, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Bo ChenBo
      ChenChief
      Executive Officer





I, Junyan
Tong certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report
on Form 10-K/A of Bodisen Biotech, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Bodisen Biotech,
Inc.




Dated:
      October 27, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Junyan TongJunyan
      TongChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10(c)25


 


BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


 


GEORGIA POWER COMPANY


 


Effective as of March 1, 2006 the following are the annual base salaries of the Chief Executive Officer and certain other executive officers of Georgia Power Company (the “Company”).


 



	
            Michael D. Garrett

President and Chief Executive Officer
 	
            $586,000
 
	
            James H. Miller, III

Senior Vice President and General Counsel
 	
            $312,279
 
	
            Mickey A. Brown

Executive Vice President
 	
            $305,103
 
	
            Christopher C. Womack

Senior Vice President
 	
            $306,129
 



 


William C. Archer, III will serve as Executive Vice President of the Company until his retirement effective March 19, 2006.  Mr. Archer’s annual base salary for the year ended December 31, 2005 was $294,790.


 


C. B. Harreld, Executive Vice President of Southern Company Services, Inc., served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of the Company until March 17, 2005.  Mr. Harreld’s annual base salary for the year ended December 31, 2005 was $291,285.
#### DABNEY v. STATE.

No. 25918.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1952.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 15, 1952.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*537DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Upon his plea of guilty before the court of the offense of driving and operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated, appellant was convicted and assessed a fine of $125.

The record before us contains neither a ■statement of facts nor bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
#### MOSLEY v. STATE.

No. 26010.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The state has filed a motion, duly verified, asking that the appeal in this case be abated on account of the death of the appellant. A certificate of death accompanies the motion. The appeal is accordingly abated.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26861]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Cooperative Human Tissue Network.
    Date: November 6, 2000.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Boulevard, 
Conference Room J, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Lalita D. Palekar, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review, Referral and Resources Branch, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8066, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7405, (301) 496-7575.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 11, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-26861 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### HOLLINGSWORTH v. STATE.

No. 23785.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 12, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is murder. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

Appellant was charged by indictment under Article 802c, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., with unlawfully driving and operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway of this state while intoxicated, and did then and there, in the execution of said unlawful act, through mistake and accident kill Gleri Edward Gartner, Jr., by then and there driving said automobile into and causing it to collide with and strike said Glen Edward Gartner, Jr.

The statement of facts in this case, according to the certificate of the presiding judge of the court, shows that notice of appeal was given April 11, 1947, and the statement of facts was presented to the trial court for approval on August 7, 1947, more than ninety days after notice of appeal was given. Hence, the same cannot ibe considered by this Court. Appellant filed a motion for continuance which was overruled but no exception was taken thereto. He then filed a motion to first try the case of the State of Texas v. Roy Winfrey, who was separately charged by indictment with being an accessory aftér the fact, an offense growing out of the same transaction. This motion was also overruled and no exception taken. Hence, the same cannot be considered.

In view of the fact that the statement of facts was not presented to the trial court for approval until long after the period of time in which the same might be filed had expired, this Court is not authorized to consider the same, and his complaint relating to the court’s action in declining to submit to the jury his specially requested charge cannot be reviewed.

No reversible error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60038 Conference Calendar

GEORGE T. CALLICUTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAMES ANDERSON; FRED CHILDS; I. A. GILMORE; TONY COMPTON; TERRY HOLLOWAY; NATHANIEL CANNON; JAMES HOLMAN; NORS KENNEDY, Captain; CALVIN PHIPPS, Captain; EARNEST LEE; LETHA NATHAN, Captain, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:00-CV-46-LN

-------------------- August 21, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * George T. Callicutt, Mississippi prisoner no. 84125, seeks monetary and injunctive relief in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 concerning conditions of his incarceration. Callicutt has filed a notice of interlocutory appeal from the district court’s refusal to reconsider its denial of his motion for summary judgment. The district court’s order is not a final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 or 28 U.S.C. § 1291. It is notNo. 01-60038 -2- an appealable interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a), and the district court did not certify its order as appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). This court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. The appeal is DISMISSED. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(A); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Second Amendment of the Sky Financial Group, Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock Plan



 Exhibit 10.27 
  
 SECOND
AMENDMENT 
 OF THE 
 SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 2004 RESTRICTED STOCK
PLAN 
  
 WHEREAS, this corporation maintains the Sky Financial Group, Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock Plan (the “Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors has delegated authority to amend the Plan to the Compensation
Committee (the “Committee”), and the Committee has determined that amendment of the Plan is necessary and desirable. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that,
pursuant to the power reserved to the Company by Article VI of the Plan, and by virtue of the authority delegated to the Committee, the Plan be and is hereby amended, effective as of February 1, 2005, by substituting the following for the
definition of “Retirement” in Article I of the Plan: 
  
 “Retirement. ‘Retirement’ shall mean the termination of a Participant’s employment after age 55, except in the case of a Just Cause Termination.” 
  
 *        *        * 
  
 I, W. Granger Souder, Jr., Secretary of Sky Financial Group, Inc., hereby certify that the foregoing is a correct copy of resolutions duly
adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of said corporation on December 13, 2005, and that the resolutions have not been changed or repealed. 
  

			
		
	 	 	 /s/ W. Granger Souder, Jr.


	 	 	 Secretary as Aforesaid
 (Corporate Seal)