alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Tambrands Inc.
FORM 10-Q
PART II, Item 6., Exhibit 12
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Unaudited)

The following table sets forth the Company's ratio of earnings to fixed charges
for the periods indicated.
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                 Nine months ended          Three months ended 
                                                                   September 30,               September 30,
                                                              ------------------------     ----------------------   
(in thousands, except ratios)                                    1995         1994            1995       1994 
                                                              ------------------------     ----------------------   
<S>                                                              <C>         <C>           <C>          <C> 

Earnings:
  Income before income taxes                                     $103,153    $106,468      $42,934      $39,719
  Fixed charges                                                     8,581       7,397        3,107        2,497
                                                              -----------------------      ----------------------  
    Earnings                                                     $111,734    $113,865      $46,041      $42,216
                                                              =======================      ======================


Fixed charges:
  Interest portion of operating
    lease expense:
      Operating lease expense                                      $4,549      $2,971       $1,730         $942
      Assumed interest factor                                        0.33        0.33         0.33         0.33
                                                              -----------------------      ---------------------- 

        Interest portion of operating
          lease expense                                             1,501         980          571          311
  Interest expense                                                  7,080      $6,417        2,536        2,186
                                                              -----------------------      ---------------------- 
    Fixed charges                                                  $8,581      $7,397       $3,107       $2,497
                                                              =======================      ======================


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                   13.0        15.4         14.8         16.9
                                                              =======================      ======================
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 205 (Monday, October 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27084]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463), announcement is made of the 
following National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of 
November 2000.

    Name: Maternal and Child Health Research Grants Review 
Committee.
    Date and Time: November 15-17, 2000; 8:00 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: Ramada Inn Bethesda, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20814.
    The meeting is open to the public on Wednesday, November 15, 
2000, from 9 a.m.-10:00 a.m., and closed for the remainder of the 
meeting.
    Purpose: To review research grant applications in the program 
areas of maternal and child health, administered by the Maternal and 
Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration.
    Agenda: The open portion of the meeting will cover opening 
remarks by the Director, Division of Research, Training and 
Education, who will report on program issues, congressional 
activities, and other topics of interest to the field of maternal 
and child health. The meeting will be closed to the public on 
Wednesday, November 15, 2000, from 10:00 a.m. through the remainder 
of the meeting for the review of grant applications. The closing is 
in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), 
Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination by the Associate Administrator 
for Management and Program Support, Health Resources and Services 
Administration, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, minutes of 
meetings, or other relevant information should write or contact 
Gontran Lamberty, Dr. P.H., Executive Secretary, Maternal and Child 
Health Research Grants Review Committee, Room 18A-55, Parklawn 
Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone 
(301) 443-2190.

    Dated: October 16, 2000.
Jane M. Harrison,
Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 00-27084 Filed 10-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 27A/27 g

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 27A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 58° anno27 gennaio 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 27A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

58° anno27 gennaio 2015

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rettifiche |
| 2015/C 027A/01 | Rettifica dell’Invito a manifestare interesse — Agenti contrattuali amministratori-ricercatori (gruppo di funzioni IV) nel settore della ricerca parlamentare — (GU C 55 A del 26.2.2014 ) | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

Rettifiche

2015/C 027A/01

Rettifica dell’Invito a manifestare interesse — Agenti contrattuali amministratori-ricercatori (gruppo di funzioni IV) nel settore della ricerca parlamentare — (GU C 55 A del 26.2.2014 )

(GU C 55 A del 26.2.2014 )

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

Rettifiche

| 27.1.2015 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 27/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2015

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 27/1

---

Rettifica dell’Invito a manifestare interesse — Agenti contrattuali amministratori-ricercatori (gruppo di funzioni IV) nel settore della ricerca parlamentare

(Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea
  C 55 A del 26 febbraio 2014
  )

(2015/C 027 A/01)

A pagina 4, titolo VIII, ultima frase:

anziché:

«Il contratto sarà stipulato conformemente agli articoli 3 bis, 84 e 85 del RAA.»,

leggi:

«Il contratto sarà stipulato conformemente agli articoli 3 ter, 84 e 88 del RAA.».

---
#### Selznick, Appellant, *v.*The Toledo Edison Co., Appellee.

(No. 28037

Decided March 6, 1940.)

*Mr. M. L. Ohm*and *Mr. Willard G. Hetzel,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Welles, Kelsey, Gob own S Harrington*and *Mr. Fred A. Smith,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the rea*425son no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
EPA/NAIMA Meeting December 6, 2012 Kansas City, Kansas Participants

NAIMA Members

• Steve Aldridge, Knauf Insulation

• Lauren Alterman, CertainTeed Corporation

• Chris Bulls, Owens Corning

• Carlos Davis, CertainTeed Corporation

• Ken Gould, Owens Corning

• Sherri Livengood, Johns Manville

• Mike Pettis, Owens Corning

• Grover Thomas, Guardian Fiberglass

• Brent Tracy, Johns Manville

NAIMA Staff

• Angus Crane

• Chris Martin

• Denise Radinovic

EPA

• Keith Barnette

• Stephanie Dolan

• Susan Fairchild

• Hugh McCullough

• Dave Reeves

- RTI
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2840 

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to exclude raisins from 

agricultural marketing orders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2013 

Mr. RADEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to exclude raisins 

from agricultural marketing orders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF RAISINS FROM AGRICULTURAL 

4 MARKETING ORDERS. 

5 (a) EXCLUSION.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 8c(2)(A) of the Ag7 ricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c(2)(A)), re8 enacted with amendments by the Agricultural Mar9 keting Agreement Act of 1937, is amended by strikVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:52 Jul 30, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2840.IH H2840

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2840 IH

1 ing ‘‘and the products of honeybees’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘the products of honeybees, and raisins’’. 

3 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such Act is 

4 further amended by striking ‘‘raisins,’’ each place it 

5 appears in the following provisions: 

6 (A) Section 8c(6)(I) (7 U.S.C. 608c(6)(I)). 

7 (B) Section 8e(a) (7 U.S.C. 608e–1). 

8 (b) EXISTING ORDERS.—Effective on the date of the 

9 enactment of this Act, no order issued by the Secretary 

10 pursuant to section 8c of the Agricultural Adjustment Act 

11 (7 U.S.C. 608c), as in effect prior to such enactment, shall 

12 have any force or effect with respect to raisins. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### BROCK v. STATE.

No. 22018.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 18, 1942.

Sanders & Letts, of Houston, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and was fined the sum of $200.

No statement of facts or bills of exceptions appear in the record, hence no question is presented for our review.

All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27002]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA'')

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, 38 FR 19029, 
and 42 U.S.C. 9622(d)(2), notice is hereby given that on September 28, 
2000, a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. American Cyanamid 
Company, et al., Civil Action No. 00-Civ.-6015 (LMM), was lodged with 
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. 
The proposed consent decree resolves the United States' claims for past 
and future costs against John Giannattasio, the principal officer and 
shareholder of Haul-A-Way and J&G Refuse Company for the Sarney Farm 
Superfund Site under Section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9607. 
Under the terms of the proposed consent decree, the settler will pay 
$482,000 to the United States as reimbursement for the costs the United 
States incurred or will incur at the Sarney Farm Superfund Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, 
DC 20044-7611, and should refer to United States v. American Cyanamid 
Company, et al., D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-854/1.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at EPA Region II, 
Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, 
New York 10007-1866. A copy of the consent decree may also be obtained 
by mail from the Department of Justice Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 
7611, Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a copy, with the attachment, 
please enclose a check in the amount of $11.75 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Bruce S. Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-27002 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Exhibit
32.2


WESTERN
RESERVE BANCORP, INC.


FORM
10-K


Year
ended December 31, 2009




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Cynthia A. Mahl, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Cynthia A. MahlCynthia
      A. MahlExecutive
      Vice President/Chief Financial OfficerMarch
      23, 2010
SMR/MOATT 

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

DONALD J. TRUMP; U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY; ELAINE C. DUKE. 

______________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

DONALD J. TRUMP; U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY; ELAINE C. DUKE, in her

official capacity as Acting Secretary of the

Department of Homeland Security,

Petitioners,

 v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO,

Respondent,

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA; JANET NAPOLITANO,

In her official capacity as President of the

University of California; STATE OF

CALIFORNIA; STATE OF MAINE;

STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF

MARYLAND; CITY OF SAN JOSE;

DULCE GARCIA; MIRIAM GONZALEZ

AVILA; VIRIDIANA CHABOLLA 

MENDOZA; NORMA RAMIREZ;

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA;

No. 17-72917

D.C. Nos. 3:17-cv-05211-WHA

 3:17-cv-05235-WHA

 3:17-cv-05329-WHA

 3:17-cv-05380-WHA

 3:17-cv-05813-WHA

Northern District of California,

San Francisco

ORDER

FILED

NOV 18 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
SMR/MOATT 2 

SERVICE EMPLOYEES

INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 521;

JIRAYUT LATTHIVONGSKORN;

SAUL JIMENEZ SUAREZ,

Real Parties in Interest.

Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

The court has received the government’s November 17, 2017 emergency 

stay motion. The response to the motion is due Monday, November 20, 2017, at 

12:00 p.m. PST, and the optional reply is due Monday, November 20, 2017, at 

5:00 p.m. PST.

In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in the response and 

reply, the parties shall address whether this court has jurisdiction to grant a stay of 

proceedings, or whether the motion for a stay should instead be filed in the district 

court. See Ellis v. U.S. Dist. Court, 360 F.3d 1022 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc).
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our reports dated March 9, 2006, accompanying theconsolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report ofHorizon Offshore, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of saidreports in the Registration Statements of Horizon Offshore, Inc. onForms S-3 (File No. 333-47246, effective October 11, 2000, File No.333-62356, effective June 11, 2001, and File No. 333-130724,effective February 9, 2006) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-62630,effective June 8, 2001, File No. 333-98243, effective August 16,2002, File No. 333-110167, effective October 31, 2003, and File No.333-128306, effective September 14, 2005)./s/ Grant Thornton LLPHouston, Texas
## MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

RESPONSE TO CO:\1MENTS for the 

## PUBLIC HEARING and SUBl\HSSION

Hearing held on December /4, 1006 in Ballimore, Maryland in relarion 10:**~'i ion**  to 

### Maryland's Transportation Conformity State Implementation Plan

N

O COM.'\IEl'iT S WERE RECEIVED AT THE HEARIl'i'G OR D U Rll'iG THE P U BLIC C OMMENT PERIOD
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2709 

To extend the Generalized System of Preferences. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2013 

Mr. CAMP (for himself, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. NUNES, and Mr. RANGEL) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the Generalized System of Preferences. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF 

4 PREFERENCES. 

5 Section 505 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

6 2465) is amended by striking ‘‘July 31, 2013’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘September 30, 2015’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

 The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-1793 

___________

Robert Terrence Jackson, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Southern District of Iowa.

*

State of Iowa, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 12, 2005

Filed: December 16, 2005

___________

Before BYE, BEAM, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Robert Terrence Jackson appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of his habeas

petition. We affirm.

Jackson placed his petition in the prison mail system on October 19, 2003, and

it was filed with the district court on October 28, 2003. Jackson’s “maximum

discharge date” from supervised release was October 30, 2003. The district court, in
-2-

review of Jackson’s habeas petition, found Jackson was discharged from his term of

supervised release on September 30, 2003. 

Federal jurisdiction exists over petitions for habeas relief only when such relief

is sought by persons “in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of

the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). A federal district

court is without jurisdiction to address the merits of a section 2254 petition where the

habeas petitioner – who has served his state sentence and has been discharged from

supervised release – is no longer “in custody” for his state conviction. Charlton v.

Morris, 53 F.3d 929, 929 (8th Cir. 1995). Upon finding Jackson was discharged from

supervised release prior to the filing of his habeas petition, the district court dismissed

the petition. This appeal followed.

In habeas cases, we review the district court’s findings of fact for clear error

and its legal conclusions de novo. Reagan v. Norris, 365 F.3d 616, 621 (8th Cir.

2004). “A district court’s choice between two permissible views of evidence cannot

be clearly erroneous.” Estate of Davis v. Delo, 115 F.3d 1388, 1393-94 (8th Cir.

1997).

The district court based its finding Jackson was discharged from supervised

release on September 30, 2003, based upon a September 30, 2003, entry by Jackson’s

parole officer which notes the officer informed Jackson he was discharged from

parole, the file was purged, and the case closed. The entry also indicates the officer

had not received Jackson’s discharge papers as of September 30, 2003. 

Jackson does not challenge the accuracy or authenticity of the case note entry.

Instead, he asserts he was not discharged until he signed the discharge papers. We do

not find this argument compelling. Jackson was never informed his discharge from
-3-

parole was dependent upon signing the discharge papers. Accordingly, we conclude

the district court’s finding Jackson was discharged from supervised release on

September 30, 2003, is not clearly erroneous. As such, the district court correctly

determined it did not have jurisdiction to entertain the habeas petition. We therefore

affirm the district court’s dismissal of Jackson’s habeas petition.

______________________________
C2ae 

Lansing • Grand Rapids 

Gaylord • Escanaba 

725 Prudden Slreel 

Lansing, Ml .38906 

P-517.371.1200 

F. 517 371.2013 

infofe'C2ae.com 

www C2ae com 

[ OF 

;PORTMiOM 

"OPEl'iAilOtiS 

rr; P Ub 

February 6-2012 

Docket Management Faciliiy 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

West Building Ground Floor. Room WI2-I4 0 

Washinglon.be 20590 

"RerSiinXoiInir y Slot E.\emption - Docket Number FAA-2012-0089 ~ ' "' " 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Sun Country has requested an exemption from the slot limit for' Ronald Reagan Washmgton National 

Airport (l^CA) set forth in §93. i 23(a), to permit tlie FA A to create air carrier slots during certain 

limited hours for Sun Country's use. The proposed air cairier slots would replace two slot exemptions 

under DOTOrder 20IO-!2-l6 awarded to Sun Country. On January 6. 2012. (he United Stales Court 

of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the DOT Order, and Sun Country will lose its 

exisiing'service between DCA and Lansing's Capital Region Intemationai Airport. SpeciFically, Sun 

Countrj' desires one daily slot during each of the 1000 and 1100 hours The proposed exemption 

would permit Sun Country lo continue operating ils existing services and avoid an inequitable result of 

the Court's order. 

C2AE and its' over 100 employees desire lo maintain Sun Cotmliy's service in and out of Capital 

Region International Airport in Lansing, Michigan. The removal ol this Hight has a significant 

negative impact on our local economy, since both the airlines and the airport have spent signitlcanl 

funds promoting and operating the service successfully. Access to major airport hubs, such as 

Washington Reagan and Minneapolis/Sl. Paul are vital to our business travel as \veli as our employee's 

personal travel. • • •• '•. • •.: :.• "•' . 

The Sun Country DCA service is essential to the economic growth of the Greater Lansing Region. The 

daily service is the only large aircraft (737-800") service lo Washington Reagan Airport, in the stale of 

Michigan outside of Detroit. Prior to Sun Cournry, the regional communiiy had requested ihe 

introduction ofthisscrvice from-numerous other airline operators-without-successr-.Accordinglyritis—-

critical that (he FAA lake the necessary steps to ensure Ihe continuation of the Sun Counlr\' slots at the 

established flight times in support of Greater Lansing's business and economic growth. 

Your immediate approval of this exemption, so that Sun Country can begin to enter Hights schedules 

for sale for the balance of 2012. will be greatly appreciated. 

• . !•••.• • 

William J 

President CEO 

;-_ ' ; _ (;,• ! •,;(;' • 

A R C 11 I "I" t C T LI R F, 

E N G I N F, [ R [ N G 

PLANNIN G 

;•' '-'". } ! ' ',y.^^ 

• p \'. , •.,••.!, : I. 1<!,'L;'1, : 

It''S " f' H H' r'E'O P L E