alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Pathmark
Stores, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Operations for the 39 weeks ended October
30, 1999 and Consolidated Balance Sheet as October 30, 1999 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                                8,678
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        16,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                         (1,044)
<INVENTORY>                                         166,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    290,573
<PP&E>                                              893,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (412,496)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      873,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               372,750
<BONDS>                                           1,268,608
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (1,160,980)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        873,320
<SALES>                                           2,742,039
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,742,039
<CGS>                                             1,961,106
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,961,106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       (234)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (120,958)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (29,221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            (27)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (29,248)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (29,248)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0



</TABLE>
#### Columbus Titles, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Thatcher, Aud., et al., Appellees.

(No. 27663

Decided October 4, 1939.)

*26
      *Mr. Carl H. Valentine,*for appellant.

*Mr. Ralph J. Bartlett,*prosecuting attorney, *Mr. Robert P. Barnhart*and *Mr. Edmund B. Paoston,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
Order filed November 13, 2015

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00864-CV

____________

In the Interest of B.M.S., Child

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-04457J

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the 

termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue. Appellant's brief was due 

November 12, 2015. No brief has been filed. 

Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be 

brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. 

See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (effective May 1, 2012). This accelerated schedule 

requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines. 

Therefore we order appellant’s appointed counsel William M. Thursland, to 

file appellant’s brief no later than November 23, 2015. If the brief is not filed by 

that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in 
contempt of court. In addition, the court may require appointment of new counsel 

due to the failure to timely file appellant’s brief. 

PER CURIAM
#### McAllen SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 23773.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 4, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of three years.

Upon the application of the appellant, duly verified, in which he requests this Court to dismiss his appeal, the application is granted and the appeal of the appellant is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
#### THOMAS J. WALCZYK *v.*BARBERINO REALTY AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ET AL.

*Eugene P. Falco,*in support of the petition.

*Robert J. Reeve,*in opposition, which was adopted by *James E. Hayes*and *Kerry R. Callahan.*

Decided May 15, 1998

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 911 (AC 17055), is denied.

CALLAHAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a

BRAZOS LICENSING AND

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 6:20-cv-573-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT UNDER RULE 7.1 OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE LLC

Under Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Google LLC discloses 

that Google LLC is a subsidiary of XXVI Holdings Inc., which is a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. 

Alphabet Inc. is publicly traded; no publicly traded company holds more than 10% of its stock.

Date: September 11, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Michael E. Jones

Michael E. Jones (Texas Bar No. 10929400)

Patrick C. Clutter (Texas Bar No. 24036374)

Potter Minton, P.C.

110 North College, Suite 500

Tyler, Texas, 75702

+1 (903) 597-8311

+1 (903) 593-0846 facsimile

mikejones@potterminton.com

patrickclutter@potterminton.com

Tharan Gregory Lanier (pro hac vice)

Jones Day

1755 Embarcadero Road

Palo Alto, California, 94303

+1 (650) 739-3939

+1 (650) 739-3900 facsimile

tglanier@jonesday.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Google LLC

Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 17 Filed 09/11/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 11, 2020, I electronically filed this document 

with the Clerk of Court via the Court’s CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 

to all counsel of record, all of whom have consented to electronic service in this action.

/s/ Michael E. Jones 

Michael E. Jones 

Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 17 Filed 09/11/20 Page 2 of 2
#### COTHRUM v. STATE.

No. 22838.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 17, 1944.

Robert L. Hurt, of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of forgery, and by the jury assessed a penalty of two years in the State penitentiary.

The record fails to show that appellant has ever been sentenced as is required by Art. 769, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P., and cases there cited, the conviction being for a felony less than capital.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Michael Benstock     
|Michael Benstock         
|Chief Executive Officer  
|                         
|/s/ Andrew D. Demott, Jr.
|Andrew D. Demott, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer  
|                         
|Date: October 24, 2008
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1

                   LETTER RE CHANGE IN CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

March 9, 2001

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549
Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We were previously the principal accountants for AmerUs Group Co. and,
under the date of February 5, 2001, we reported on the consolidated financial
statements of AmerUs Group Co. and subsidiaries as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2000 and 1999. On February 19, 2001, we were notified by the
management of AmerUs Group Co. that the client-auditor relationship would cease
upon completion of our audit of AmerUs Group's consolidated financial statements
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000, and the issuance of our report
thereon. We have read AmerUs Group Co.'s statements included under Item 9 of its
Form 10-K dated March 9, 2001, and we agree with such statements, except that we
are not in a position to agree or disagree with AmerUs Group Co.'s statement
that the change was recommended by the audit committee of the board of directors
and approved by the board of directors.

                                          KPMG LLP
#### Earl G. MATHEWS, Appellant, v. STATE.

No. 26288.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 11, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for murder, the jury having assessed the punishment at 50 years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his motion stating under oath that he desires to dismiss his appeal.

The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

Voxer, Inc. and Voxer IP LLC 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Facebook, Inc. and Instagram LLC 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00655-ADA 

Jury Trial Demanded 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS FACEBOOK, INC. AND INSTAGRAM LLC’S 

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(C) 

 BEFORE THE COURT is Defendants Facebook, Inc. and Instagram LLC’s Motion for 

Judgment on the Pleadings Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(C). After consideration of said motion, the 

Court finds that Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED and Counts I 

and IV of Plaintiffs’ Complaint are dismissed with prejudice. 

SIGNED on this _______ day of _______________________, 2021. 

__________________________________ 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:20-cv-00655-LY Document 85-1 Filed 03/29/21 Page 1 of 1
**STOCKERYALE, INC.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

        In connection with the  Quarterly  Report of StockerYale, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard P. Lindsay, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 
| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of the Company. |

This certification is provided solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K  ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended  (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii)  of Item 601(b)(32), this Certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for  purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the  liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by  reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except  to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
| Date: November 15, 2004 | Name:  | /s/**Richard P. Lindsay                    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Richard P. Lindsay                         |
|                    |   |                                       |
|                    | Title: | Chief Financial Officer and      Treasurer |

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 has been provided to StockerYale, Inc. and will be  retained by StockerYale, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request. 

 Exhibit 32.2  /  STKR END2004 Form 10-Q
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2003 of Horizon Offshore, Inc. (the Company)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report).

I, Bill J. Lam, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

--------------------------------------
Bill J. Lam
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 15, 2004
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Patrick J. Moore, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Patrick J. Moore    |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Patrick  J. Moore        |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| November 5,  2010   |   |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided toSmurfit-Stone Container Corporation and will be retained by Smurfit-StoneContainer Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit 21.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**
| **Name of  Subsidiary**               | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Organization** |
|---------------------------------------|------------|------------|------------|----------------------------------|
| K-Sea OLP GP LLC                      |       | Delaware   |
| K-Sea Operating  Partnership L.P.     |       | Delaware   |
| K-Sea Transportation  Inc.            |       | Delaware   |
| Norfolk Environmental  Services, Inc. |       | Delaware   |
| Inversiones Kara Sea SRL              |       | Venezuela  |
| K-Sea Acquisition1, LLC               |       | Delaware   |
| K-Sea Acquisition2, LLC               |       | Delaware   |

 

----
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0773 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2009-SW-71-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Exhibit 99.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

     I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, Motorola Debenture-Backed Series 2002-14 Trust (the "Trust"),
certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
         Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
         servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in
         respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report
         of the Trust;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
         omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
         in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
         not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
         annual report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
         provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
         under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in
         such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

     4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
         based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
         Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.



Date: March 29, 2004


      /s/ David J. Kolibachuk
---------------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President



                                      8
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Melinda S. Urion, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer of AmerUs Group Co., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AmerUs Group Co.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 15(e) and 15d – 15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Dated: March 12, 2004     By /s/ Melinda S. Urion       Melinda S. Urion   Executive Vice President,   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   AmerUs Group Co.