alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3047 

To authorize borrowers of loans under the William D. Ford Federal Direct 

Loan Program to modify the interest rate of such loans to be equal 

to the interest rate for such loans at the time of modification. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2013 

Mr. POCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To authorize borrowers of loans under the William D. Ford 

Federal Direct Loan Program to modify the interest 

rate of such loans to be equal to the interest rate for 

such loans at the time of modification. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BORROWER MODIFICATION OF INTEREST 

4 RATES UNDER THE WILLIAM D. FORD FED5 ERAL DIRECT LOAN PROGRAM. 

6 Section 455(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

7 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(b)) is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new paragraph: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3047 IH

1 ‘‘(10) BORROWER MODIFICATION OF INTEREST

2 RATE.— 

3 ‘‘(A) MODIFICATION.—Notwithstanding 

4 the preceding paragraphs of this subsection, the 

5 borrower of a Federal Direct Stafford Loan, a 

6 Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford Loan, a 

7 Federal Direct PLUS Loan, or a Federal Di8 rect Consolidation Loan may elect to modify the 

9 interest rate of the loan to be equal to the in10 terest rate that would be applicable to such loan 

11 if such loan were first disbursed (or in the case 

12 of a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan, first 

13 applied for) on the date on which such borrower 

14 elects to modify the interest rate of such loan. 

15 ‘‘(B) FIXED RATE.—Except as provided in 

16 subparagraph (C), an interest rate elected 

17 under subparagraph (A) for a loan shall be 

18 fixed for the life of the loan. 

19 ‘‘(C) CONTINUING AUTHORITY TO MOD20 IFY.—A borrower may elect to modify the inter21 est rate of a loan in accordance with subpara22 graph (A) at any time during the life of the 

23 loan.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-56194, 333-129083, 333-131522, 333-131523 and 333-62008 on Form S-8 of our reportdated April 19, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Pathmark Stores, Inc., and subsidiaries (the“Company”), which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’sadoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”, as revised,and SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – as amendment ofSFAS No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)”, and our report dated April 19, 2007 relating to management's report on the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PathmarkStores, Inc. for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York

April 19, 2007
Exhibit ‘E’

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 110-5 Filed 10/14/22 Page 1 of 5
D 000110
D 000111
D 000112
D 000113
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the quarterly report of Tecumseh Products Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
James J. Bonsall, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 9, 2007                   BY: /s/ JAMES J. BONSALL
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            James J. Bonsall
                                            President and
                                            Chief Operating Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

STANDING ORDER REGARDING

UPDATED ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS – PATENT CASES

On November 5, 2020, the Court published its latest Order Governing Proceedings for 

Patent Cases (OGP version 3.2).1 To improve judicial efficiency, the Court ORDERS that OGP 

version 3.2 shall apply retroactively to the Markman briefing in patent cases that are at least one 

week before the filing of the opening Markman brief. 2 The parties are directed to file an 

amended proposed scheduling order based on OGP version 3.2.

SIGNED this 9th day of November, 2020.

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 Available at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/wpcontent/uploads/Standing%20Orders/Waco/Albright/Sample%20Order%20Governing%20Proce

edings%20-%20Patent%20Cases110520.pdf

2

In other words, if the deadline for the parties’ opening Markman briefs is more than a week 

after the date of this standing order, the Markman briefing shall be governed by OGP version 

3.2.

Case 6:20-cv-00455-ADA Document 33 Filed 11/09/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Stephan Co. (the
"Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, David Spiegel, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



/s/ David A. Spiegel
__________________________________
David A. Spiegel
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2006
#### PEDDERSEN v. STATE.

No. 26490.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 17, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

William H. Scott, Crim. Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of assault with intent to murder; the penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

*211Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged and waived a jury upon the trial. All matters of procedure appear to be in regular form. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence thereof, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
exv10w65



 






Exhibit 10.65




	 	 	 
	 

	 	December 8, 2004






Mr. Matthew K. Rose

Chairman

Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp.

2650 Lou Menk Drive

Fort Worth, TX 76131




Dear Matt:




          This will confirm the following agreement relating to the deferral of your director’s fees in
2005.



          1. All director’s fees and retainers (“Fees”) payable to you in connection with your service
on the boards of directors (including committees of such boards) of AMR Corporation and American
Airlines, Inc. for the period January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, will be deferred and paid
to you in accordance with this letter agreement.



          2. Fees will be converted to Stock Equivalent Units in accordance with the Directors’ Stock
Equivalent Purchase Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Plan”).



          3. Within 30 days of the date when you cease to be a Director of AMR Corporation, the Stock
Equivalent Units accrued in 2005 pursuant to the Plan will be converted to cash and paid to you by
multiplying the number of such Stock Equivalent Units by the arithmetic mean of the high and the
low of AMR stock during the month when you ceased to be a Director of AMR Corporation.



          4. In the event of your death, the cash payment contemplated by paragraph 3 will be made to
your named beneficiary under the Director’s Term Life Insurance Policy maintained by the
Corporation.




 









 








          If the foregoing is satisfactory to you, please indicate by signing one of the originals (two
are enclosed) and returning it to me.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 		 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Charles D. MarLett

Corporate Secretary	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Accepted and agreed:
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Matthew K. Rose
 


	 	 
	 	 
	Matthew K. Rose
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	12/21/2004
 


	 	 
	 	 
	Date
1 

WEST\291822263.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD, and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC., 

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00507-ADA 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF DEFENDANTS SAMSUNG 

ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. 

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants Samsung 

Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”) and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“SEA”), by and through 

their undersigned counsel, state as follows: 

1. SEC is a publicly held corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of 

Korea. SEC has no parent corporation and no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of 

SEC’s stock; and 

2. SEA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SEC. No other publicly held corporation 

owns 10% or more of SEA’s stock. 

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 13 Filed 09/25/20 Page 1 of 3
2 

WEST\291822263.1

Dated: September 25, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ John M. Guaragna 

John M. Guaragna 

Texas Bar No 24043308 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2500 

Austin, TX 78701-3799 

Tel: 512.457.7125 

Fax: 512.457.7001 

john.guaragna@dlapiper.com 

ATTORNEY FOR SAMSUNG 

ELECTRONICS CO. LTD, and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC. 

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 13 Filed 09/25/20 Page 2 of 3
3 

WEST\291822263.1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that on this 25th day of September 2020, all counsel of record 

who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this 

document through the Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). Any other counsel 

of record will be served by a facsimile transmission and/or first class mail. 

/s/ John M. Guaragna 

John M. Guaragna 

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 13 Filed 09/25/20 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Maritime Administration

[Docket No. MARAD-2000-7798]


Criteria for Granting Waivers of Requirement for Exclusive U.S.-
Flag Vessel Carriage of Certain Export Cargoes

AGENCY: Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Maritime Administration (MARAD) is hereby giving notice 
that the closing date for comments in Docket No. MARAD-2000-7798, 
proposed policy revision relating to the criteria for granting waivers 
of requirement for exclusive U.S.-flag vessel carriage of certain 
export cargoes, has been extended to close of business (5:00 p.m. est) 
November 13, 2000. The notice of application in Docket No. MARAD-2000-
7798 was published in the Federal Register of August 21, 2000 (65 FR 
50732-50740).

    Dated: October 16, 2000.

    By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-26890 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
1

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Docket Index for

[EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0746]

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

Approval, Disapproval, and Limited Approval and Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation 

Plans; California; Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District; Stationary Source 

Permits

Category I. State Implementation Plan Revision Submittals and Related Materials 

I-A SIP submittal letter from CARB dated May 8, 2001

I-B Monterey Bay Staff Report dated December 13, 2000

I-C Rule 200 amended on December 13, 2000 

I-D Rule 208 amended on December 13, 2000 

I-E SIP submittal letter from CARB dated May 31, 2001

I-F Monterey Bay Staff Report dated March 21, 2001

I-G Rule 204 amended on March 21, 2001 

I-H Rule 206 amended on March 21, 2001 

I-I SIP submittal letter from CARB dated December 12, 2002

I-J Monterey Bay Staff Report dated October 16, 2002

I-K Rule 203 amended on October 16, 2002

I-L Rule 212 amended on October 16, 2002

I-M SIP submittal letter from CARB dated May 12, 2011

I-N Monterey Bay Staff Report dated April 20, 2011

I-O Rule 207 amended on April 20, 2011 

Category II. Federal Register Notices Cited in the Proposed Rule1

II-A 52 FR 26148, dated July 13, 1987 

II-B 64 FR 35577, dated July 1, 1999

II-C 65 FR 5433, dated February 4, 2000

Category III. Other Relevant Documents

III-A TSD for NPRM for Monterey Bay Rule Revisions, dated September 29, 2014

III-B MBUAPCD SIP Rule 200, Permits Required, SIP approved July 1, 1999

III-C MBUAPCD SIP Rule 204, Cancellation of Applications, SIP approved July 1, 1999

III-D MBUAPCD SIP Rule 206, Standards for Granting Applications, SIP approved July 13, 

 

1 All notices dated after 1994 are available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=FR All 

other Federal Register notices listed are provided in the electronic docket. 
2

1987

III-E MBUAPCD SIP Rule 207, Review of New or Modified Sources, SIP approved February 4, 

2000

III-F MBUAPCD SIP Rule 208, Standards for Granting Permits to Operate, SIP approved July 

13, 1987

III-G MBUAPCD SIP Rule 212, Public Availability of Emission Data, SIP approved July 13, 

1987

IV. EPA Rulemaking Documents

IV-A Federal Register Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, dated 10-15-14

IV-B Federal Register Notice of Final Rulemaking

Note: Items in Red font have been added to the Index since the proposed rulemaking action.
EXHIBIT 32.2
Certification of CFO pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Michael J. Draper, Chief Financial Officer of America First Apartment Investors, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that:
(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: May 3, 2005   /s/ Michael J. Draper    Michael J. Draper  Chief Financial Officer  
*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AmericaFirst Apartment Investors, Inc. and will be retained by America First Apartment Investors, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
#### LENOX v. STATE.

No. 24796.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 31, 1950.

Rehearing Denied June 21, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*720BEAUCHAMP, Judge. .

Upon his plea of guilty before the court, appellant was found guilty of the offense of carrying a pistol and his punishment assessed at a fine of $100.00 and six months in jail.

The record before us contains no bills of exception nor statement of facts. The proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.,

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,509
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (278)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,815
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,729
<PP&E>                                          10,494
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,568)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           737
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,935
<SALES>                                         25,052
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,052
<CGS>                                           18,616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,923
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,185
<INCOME-TAX>                                       569
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                616
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       616
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of Vertis, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that: The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004(the Report)
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.  Dated: February 25, 2005
  /s/ DONALD E. ROLANDName:
  Donald E. RolandTitle:
  Chief Executive Officer  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.13

                             SECOND WAIVER EXTENSION

         WAIVER, dated as of November 6, 1998 (this "Waiver Extension"), to the
Master Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of May 15, 1998 (as amended,
supplemented or otherwise modified prior to the date hereof, the "Loan
Agreement"), between CHASTAIN CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Georgia corporation (the
"Borrower"), and MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a New York Banking
corporation (the "Lender").

                                    RECITALS

         The Borrower has requested the Lender to agree to extend the
expiration of the Waiver, dated as of October 22, 1998 between the Borrower and
the Lender (the "Waiver"). The Lender is willing to agree to extension, but
only on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Waiver.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Borrower and the Lender hereby agree as follows:

         1.       Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined
in the Loan Agreement are used herein as therein defined.

         2.       Waiver Extension. The Lender hereby agrees to extend the
termination date of the Waiver to 6:00 p.m., New York City time, on November
12, 1998, at which time the Waiver shall automatically terminate, without
notice.

         3.       Effectiveness. This Waiver shall become effective upon
execution by the Lender and receipt by the Lender of evidence satisfactory to
the Lender that this Waiver has been executed and delivered by the Borrower.

         4.       No Other Amendments or Modifications. Unless expressly
amended herein, all terms, conditions and other provisions of the Waiver shall
remain in full force and effect and shall not be deemed amended or modified
hereby.

         5.       Counterparts. This Waiver may be executed by one or more of
the parties hereto on any number of separate counterparts and all of said
counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same
instrument.

         6.       Applicable Law. THIS WAIVER SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND
CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICTS OF LAW RULES.


                                      -1-
<PAGE>   2

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Waiver
Extension to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first above
written.


                                      MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF 
                                      NEW YORK, as Lender



                                      By:
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Name:
                                         Title:


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

CHASTAIN CAPITAL CORPORATION



By:
   ---------------------------
Name:
Title:



                                      -2-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DEMETRICE HERRON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 331 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

Cross-Petitioner

v.

DEMETRICE HERRON,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 332 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of February, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.