alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Dennis OBrien, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Silver Mines, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-a5(f)) for the Registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within this entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 13, 2009

By:    /s/ Dennis OBrien



Dennis OBrien, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer
# 2011 Utica Shale Production

Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management 2045 Morse Rd. Bldg. F-2, Columbus Oh 43229-6693 Production Period : January 01, 2011 To December 31, 2011

Data Refreshed: 05/02/14

**Prod Year**  **Owner Name County**  **Permit Number Civil Township**  **Well Name/Well Number Oil (Barrels)**  **Gas (MCF) Brine (Barrels)**  **Days in Production**  **Date First**

**Production** 2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC HARRISON34067210570100 ARCHER NORTH AMERICAN COAL ROYALTY CO BUELL 8H 13472 1523465 8937 198 6/14/2011 2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC CARROLL34019220730100 AUGUSTA MANGUN 22-15-5 8H 12334 322435 23585 206 7/24/2011 2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC CARROLL34019220850000 CENTER 833530 BURGETT 7-15-6 8H-RS 654 0 2010 5 1/17/2012 2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC CARROLL34019220810100 CENTER SHAW20-14-5 5H 818 0 10263 11 1/17/2012 2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC CARROLL34019220740000 EAST 833124 BUCEY 3H 2167 137192 2403 53 10/16/2011 2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC MAHONING34099231350100 MILTON GEATCHES MAH 3H 758 0 8389 79 7/21/2011 2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC PORTAGE34133244200100 SUFFIELD HOSEY POR 6H-X 583 0 1796 20 2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC CARROLL34019220760100WASHINGTON HARVEY 16-14-5 8H 6096 183142 9102 92 9/30/2011 2011 CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA LLC CARROLL34019220750000WASHINGTON 833129 NEIDER 3H 9444 395290 9519 130 8/25/2011

1 of 1
1 

WEST\302755422.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

§ 

§ 

§

v. § 

§

Civil No. 6:20-cv-00507-ADA 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD, and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.,

§ 

§ 

§

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

 Defendant. §

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

The following attorney files this Notice of Change of Address and requests that the 

Court’s docket in the above-styled cause be updated accordingly. 

Tiffany C. Miller 

DLA Piper LLP (US) 

4365 Executive Drive, Suite 1100 

San Diego, CA 92121 

Telephone: 858.677.1400 

Facsimile: 858.677.1401 

Date: May 9, 2023 

 Respectfully submitted, 

By:

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

/s/ John M. Guaragna 

John M. Guaragna 

Texas Bar No 24043308 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

303 Colorado Street, Suite 3000 

Austin, TX 78701-4653 

Tel: 512.457.7125 

Fax: 512.457.7001 

john.guaragna@dlapiper.com

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 80 Filed 05/09/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

WEST\302755422.1

Mark D. Fowler (Pro hac vice) 

Bar No. 124235 

mark.fowler@dlapiper.com 

Erik Fuehrer (Pro hac vice) 

Bar No. 252578 

Erik.fuehrer@dlapiper.com 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 

Tel: 650.833.2000 

Fax: 650.833.2001 

Tiffany Miller (Pro hac vice) 

Tiffany.miller@dlapiper.com 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

401 B Street, Suite 1700 

San Diego, CA 92101-4297 

Tel: 619.699.2700 

Fax: 619.699.2701 

Zachary Loney (Pro hac vice) 

DLA Piper LLP (US) 

303 Colorado St., Suite 3000 

Austin, TX 78701 

Tel: 512.457.7000 

Zachary.loney@us.dlapiper.com 

Benjamin Mueller (Pro hac vice) 

Benjamin.mueller@dlapiper.com 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

444 West Lake Street, Suite 900 

Chicago, IL 60606-0089 

Tel: 312.368.4000 

Fax: 312.236.7516 

ATTORNEYS FOR SAMSUNG 

ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. and SAMSUNG 

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document was filed electronically on May 9, 2023, pursuant to 

Local Rule CV-5(a) and has been served on all counsel whom have consented to electronic 

service. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class U.S. mail on this same date. 

 /s/ John M. Guaragna 

 John M. Guaragna 

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 80 Filed 05/09/23 Page 2 of 2
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00364-CR

GARY LEE REID,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-2323-C2

ORDER

An Anders brief was filed by appellant’s counsel on January 21, 2014. No motion 

to withdraw was filed with the Anders brief. A motion to withdraw must be filed before 

we can proceed further with this appeal. In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 412 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2008). 

Further, the Court has not been presented with an adequate basis to determine 

that counsel has complied with his “educational burdens” and fully informed the 

appellant of the right to review the appellate record, to file a brief or other response, 
Reid v. State Page 2

and to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. See Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 

689 n. 23 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (discussion of counsel’s “educational burdens” when 

filing an Anders brief); Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 671 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (right 

to file pro se pdr); Sowels v. State, 45 S.W.3d 690, 693 (Tex. App. —Waco 2001, no pet.), 

overruled in part on other grounds, Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 689 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2006) (right to review record and file a brief or other response). 

Accordingly, counsel is ordered to file a motion to withdraw within 14 days from 

the date of this order. Counsel is also ordered to provide to the Court, within 14 days 

from the date of this order, some form of indication that counsel has provided appellant 

with a copy of the motion to withdraw and fully informed the appellant of the right to 

review the appellate record, the right to file a brief or other response, and the right to 

file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Compliance with these “educational 

burdens” may be in the form of a certificate attached to the motion to withdraw.

The failure to comply with the Court’s order will result in the striking of 

appellant’s Anders brief.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed January 30, 2014
From: "Timothy A. Blubaugh" <tblubaugh@emamail.org>

To: Byron Bunker/AA/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/09/2010 09:59 PM Subject: Vehicle Nomenclature

Hey Byron, During your presentation on Friday you said there were debates about what to call the Class 7 & 8 tractors in the GHG program. You settled on semi

- trucks/combination tractors, which sounds like the perfect bureaucratic compromise: it makes no sense. Ther e is not such thing as a “semi

- truck.” A semitrailer is a trailer constructed so that some part of its weight rests upon the towing vehicle. It may be compared to a full trailer that is constructed so that no part of its weight, except the towing device, rests on the towing vehicle. Further, there is no such thing as a “combination tractor.” A tractor is a truck designed primarily for drawing another vehicle, and not so constructed as to carry a load other than a part of the weight of the vehicle and th e load so drawn (primarily, tractors tow semitrailers). A combination vehicle is, descriptively, any combination of other vehicles (e.g., truck + full trailer, tractor + semitrailer, etc.). You can read more about these exciting definitions at 49 C.F.R. § 390.5 and § 571.3. I think the category only includes “tractors.” As long as you are talking about on

- highway tractors, and not agricultural nonroad tractors, I don’t think there is much room for confusion. (I might argue that the category actuall y should only include “long

- haul tractors” or “over

-the

- road tractors,” and not “vocational tractors,” but that is another debate.) Hoping this is helpful,
Tim 

### Timothy A. Blubaugh Truck Manufacturers Association 333 West Wacker Drive ▪ Suite 810 Chicago, IL ▪ 60606 312.929.1972 direct ▪ 312.208.0948 mobile 312.929.1975 fax tblubaugh@truckmfgs.org ▪ www.truckmfgs.org Please consider the environment before printing this email. Confidentiality

Notice : This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender b y reply

e -mail and immediately

delete it and any

attachments without copying or further transmitting the same.
EXHIBIT 99.3


                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

I, James E. Laurent, President and Chief Executive Officer of Sunair
Electronics, Inc. (the "Company"), have executed this certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003
(the "Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this certificate as of the
13th day of May 2003.

/s/ James E. Laurent
-------------------------------------
James E. Laurent
President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3040 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3040

  To provide for the minimum size of crews of freight trains, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2013

   Mr. Michaud (for himself and Ms. Pingree of Maine) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the minimum size of crews of freight trains, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Freight Act''.

SEC. 2. FREIGHT TRAIN CREW SIZE.

    (a) Amendment.--Subchapter II of chapter 201 of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 20168. Freight train crew size
    ``Effective 30 days after the date of enactment of the Safe Freight 
Act, no freight train or light engine used in connection with the 
movement of freight may be operated unless it has a crew consisting of 
at least 2 individuals, one of whom is certified under regulations 
promulgated by the Federal Railroad Administration as a locomotive 
engineer pursuant to section 20135, and the other of whom is certified 
under regulations promulgated by the Federal Railroad Administration as 
a conductor pursuant to section 20163.''.
    (b) Table of Sections Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 
201 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
the following new item:

``20168. Freight train crew size.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### McCUMBER v. STATE.

No. 22014.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 18, 1942.

Schlesinger, Goodstein & McGuire, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of receiving and concealing stolen property, and given two years in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exceptions in the record, and appellant’s insistence upon the insufficiency of the testimony is his sole contention.

We think the testimony is reasonably clear that Mr. Ben Davis lost a black white-faced cow by means of theft sometime the latter part of December, 1940. In order to affix the charged offense of receiving and concealing such animal upon the appellant, the State used three confessed accomplices who testified as to the theft of this animal and its sale to appellant. These three men were Mexicans who were themselves under a number of indictments for various charged thefts in the county, and one of whom was on parole from the penitentiary at the time of this alleged offense.

The testimony of such accomplices, and they were charged as such by the trial court, was also required by such court in his charge to be corroborated in order for a conviction in this cause to be had. The only effort at such corroborative testimony found in the record was a statement in the nature of a confession made by the appellant. It seems that appellant, when arrested by the sheriff, was taken to San Antonio, and there subjected to a trial by a “lie-detector” machine, but such machine failed to work when applied to appellant. True, he did there make a statement to the officers, which statement was introduced in evidence, but which is of such an inconclusive and unsatisfactory nature as to be useless as a matter of corroboration. It finally and merely says that: “I don’t want to say that I did not buy this above described stock and I don’t wánt to say that I am positive that I did buy them. * * * Since both of these deals was supposed to have happened in December of 1940 and as above stated, I was not keeping any records at that time, I just can’t remember if I bought this stock or not.”

This above statement is the only corroboration, if such it is, of the testimony of the three confessed accomplices, and in our opinion it falls short of the measure demanded by the law. Tt is not an admission at least of the fact that he received such black white-faced cow from these *74three witnesses, knowing the same to have been stolen, nor does it seem to us that it tendg to show the truth of the three witnesses’ statement of the cow’s sale to appellant; especially is this so in view of the good reputation proven by appellant by many witnesses. See Art. 718, C.C.P.; Robinson v. State, 141 Tex.Cr.R. 380, 148 S.W.2d 1115; Colley v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 34, 143 S.W.2d 597; Clark v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 1, 95 S.W.2d 1309.

On account of the lack of any corroboration of the three confessed accomplices, this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1997 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       927748
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     129783
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          216794
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         19671
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  367105
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1661101
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       225943
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             556717
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  782660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            501388
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    15890
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  361163
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1661101
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       127987
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             12898
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       87829
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      100727
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          27260
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                1658
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   28918
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         10507
<NET-INCOME>                                     18411
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    18411
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         13625
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           44195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
       (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                              United States Code)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC, as
Servicer of DaimlerChrysler Master Owner Trust (the "Trust"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Trust's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: March 30, 2004                 /s/ Juergen H. Walker
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Juergen H. Walker
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer,
                                     DaimlerChrysler Services North
                                     America LLC, as Servicer of
                                     DaimlerChrysler Master Owner Trust

Date: March 30, 2004                 /s/ Paul E. Knauss
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Paul E. Knauss
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
                                     DaimlerChrysler Services North
                                     America LLC, as Servicer of
                                     DaimlerChrysler Master Owner Trust

A signed original of the this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
Title 18, United States Code) has been provided to DaimlerChrysler Master Owner
Trust and will be retained by DaimlerChrysler Master Owner Trust and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.