alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
LICENSE, DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION AGREEMENT
 Second Amendment th Agreement Cook Cardica th Second Amendment
Effective Date
   7.1 Technology Transfer.
 A.
    
    Testing and Development. Cardica will continue to supply to Cook, upon Cooks
request and at a cost of $250.00 per unit, such additional units of the Product over the
number of units described in Phase 4 of the Development Plan as Cook may reasonably request
for the further testing and development of the Product.B.
    
    Commercialization.Upon Cooks request, to enable Cook or a third party designated
by Cook to manufacture such Product, or at Cooks option at any other time with respect
to any Product, whether or not such Product is ready for commercialization or the stage
of its development, Cardica will transfer to Cook or the designated third party, at no
additional cost, all equipment, including all pre-production tooling, and Cardica
Know-How, including but not limited to, all trade secret, manufacturing and supplier
information included therein, related to the Products that is reasonably necessary for
Cook or a third party to manufacture such Product (Transferred Product). Upon request
from Cook at any time, Cardica will provide, at no additional cost, reasonable technical
assistance to Cook for the Transferred Product based on the mutual availability of the
parties, which assistance may include at Cooks request: i) training of Cook personnel or
personnel of the designated third party in connection with the manufacture of Transferred
Product, ii) advice concerning the manufacture of Transferred Product, and iii) testing
of sample Transferred Product to verify that such Transferred Product complies with
applicable specifications established by the Development Committee or, at Cooks option,
specifications established by Cook to confirm successful transfer of technology to Cook
or the designated third party hereunder. Additionally, on Cooks request, the parties
will negotiate the terms under which Cardica may provide engineering services to assist
Cook or the designated third party in the design and modification of Transferred Product
to meet customer and regulatory requirements. Cardica agrees not to sue Cook, any of
Cooks customers, or any third party acting on Cooks behalf under any intellectual
property right of Cardica in connection with Cooks use of information provided by
Cardica under this Section 7.1.
 Rights upon Termination by Cook for
Convenience or Termination by Cardica for Material Breach by Cook




---



##### 



(E) Termination by Cook for Material Breach of Cardica
  Amended Agreement)
  COOK INCORPORATED
    
    
    
    CARDICA, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Brian Bates
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ R Y. NewellName:
    
    Brian Bates
    
    
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    R Y. NewellTitle:
    
    Sr. V.P. Business Development
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    CFODate:
    
    6/29/09
    
    
    
    
    
    Date:
    
    6/29/09
CERTIFICATION OF
          PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Tech
Laboratories, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, I, Bernard
Ciongoli, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Tech
Laboratories, Inc. hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

      1.    Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
            30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
            for the period ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Tech Laboratories, Inc.

Dated:  November 19, 2004

TECH LABORATORIES, INC.

By: /s/ Bernard Ciongoli
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996M AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          29,176
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,706,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,930,434
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,084,795
<PP&E>                                       3,143,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,168,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,643,035
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,713
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,278,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,168,613
<SALES>                                      8,071,392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,071,392
<CGS>                                        5,081,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,972,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             450,007
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (432,513)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (87,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (344,713)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (344,713)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
#### Roberts, Appellant, *v.*Rumpke et al., Partners, et al., Appellees.

(No. 28108

Decided April 24, 1940.)

*Mr. B. T. Dickerson*and *Mr. George Luedeke,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Ratterman, Cowell & Fletcher,*for appellees, William Rumpke and others, partners.

*Mr. Edward A. Schott,*for appellee, Industrial Commission of Ohio.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 61255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26770]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 17, 2000 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 61255]]

                Proclamation 7362 of October 12, 2000

                
Death of American Servicemembers Aboard the 
                United States Ship Cole

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                As a mark of respect for those who died on the United 
                States Ship COLE, I hereby order, by the authority 
                vested in me as President of the United States by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, that the flag of the United States shall be 
                flown at half-staff upon all public buildings and 
                grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and 
                on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the 
                District of Columbia and throughout the United States 
                and its Territories and possessions until sunset, 
                Monday, October 16, 2000. I also direct that the flag 
                shall be flown at half-staff for the same length of 
                time at all United States embassies, legations, 
                consular offices, and other facilities abroad, 
                including all military facilities and naval vessels and 
                stations.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                twelfth day of October, in the year of our Lord two 
                thousand, and of the Independence of the United States 
                of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.

                    (Presidential Sig.)

[FR Doc. 00-26770
Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
```
##### 



|               |  |             
|-------------- |  | ------------
|March 22, 2002 |  | Exhibit 99.1

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth St. NW
Washington, D.C. 20549-0305

United Defense Industries owns a 51% interest in a joint venture in Saudi
Arabia and a joint venture in Turkey. The Saudi Arabia joint venture is audited
by Arthur Andersen & Co., an affiliate of Arthur Andersen and the Turkey joint
venture is audited by Aktif Analiz S.M.M.M. A.S., also an affiliate of Arthur
Andersen. Each of the auditors opinion related to the joint ventures is
included in the December 31, 2001 Form 10-K.

Arfan K. Ayass of Saudi Arabia and Ethem Kutucular of Turkey have each
represented to us that the audit was subject to Andersens International
quality control system for the accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of personnel
working on audits. Also, Arfan K. Ayass and Ethem Kutucular had access to
Andersens national office for consultation, if such consultation was required
or needed.

United Defense Industries, Inc.

|                                                |  |                                        
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|By:                                             |  | /s/ Thomas W. Rabaut
  Thomas W. Rabaut
|President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
Panel Member Roster for July 29- July 31, 2014

Meeting of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Scientific 

Advisory Panel (SAP) on New High Throughput Methods to Estimate Chemical Exposure

Docket Number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0331

FIFRA SAP Session Chair

James L. McManaman, Ph.D.

Professor and Chief

Section of Basic Reproductive Sciences

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Physiology

and Biophysics

University of Colorado Denver

Aurora, CO

Designated Federal Official

Fred Jenkins, Jr., Ph.D.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Science Coordination and Policy

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel

EPA East Building, MC 7201M

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460

Phone (202) 564-3327

Fax (202) 564-8382

jenkins.fred@epa.gov

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Members

Dana Barr, Ph.D.

Research Professor

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health

Rollins School of Public Health

Emory University

Atlanta, GA

Kenneth Delclos, Ph.D.

Research Pharmacologist

Division of Biochemistry Toxicology

National Center for Toxicological Research

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Jefferson, AR
Marion Ehrich, Ph.D., D.A.B.T., A.T.S.

Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology

Department of Biomedical Science and Pathobiology

Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Blacksburg, VA

David Jett, Ph.D.

Program Director

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

National Institutes of Health

Bethesda, MD

FQPA Science Review Board Members

James Chen, Ph.D.

Senior Mathematical Statistician

Division of Biometry and Risk Assessment

National Center for Toxicological Research

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Jefferson, AR

Mark Cronin, Ph.D.

Professor of Predictive Toxicology

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences

Liverpool John Moores University

Liverpool, United Kingdom

Panagiotis Georgopoulos, Ph.D.

Professor

Exposure Science Division

Environmental and Occupation Health Sciences Institute 

Robert Wood Johnson Medical School

Rutgers University

Piscataway, NJ

William Hayton, Ph.D.

Professor Emeritus

Division of Environment Health Science

College of Pharmacy, School of Medicine and Public Health

Ohio State University

Columbus, OH
Peter Macdonald D.Phil., P.Stat.

Professor Emeritus of Mathematics and Statistics

McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario Canada

Cheryl Anne Murphy, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor

Department of Fisheries and Wildlife

Lyman Briggs College

Michigan State University

East Lansing, MI

Thomas Potter, Ph.D.

Research Chemist

U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Station (USDA-ARS)

USDA-ARS, Coastal Plain Experiment Station

Southeast Watershed Research Lab 

Tifton, GA

Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D.

Professor of Aquatic Ecotoxicology and Environmental Toxicology

Department of Environmental Sciences 

University of California, Riverside 

Riverside, CA
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3079 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3079

                 For the relief of Jesus Garcia Flores.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 10, 2013

Mr. Pastor of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Jesus Garcia Flores.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR JESUS GARCIA FLORES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Jesus Garcia Flores shall 
be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Jesus Garcia Flores enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Jesus Garcia Flores, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Jesus Garcia 
Flores shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### CITY OF HARRODSBURG v. YEAST.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 21, 1952.

Errol W. Draffen, W. A. Wickliffe, City Atty., Harrodsburg, for appellant.

W. Earl Dean, W. H. Phillips, Har-rodsburg, for appellee.

COMBS, Justice.

A jury awarded appellee $500 for damages caused by the intermittent overflowing of a city sewer line and the deposit of sewage on her property. The City contends it was entitled to a peremptory instruction and, in the alternative” that the instructions to the jury were erroneous.

There is evidence that the condition had existed since 1944 and that the overflow from the sewer deposited sewage on appellee’s property six or seven times a year. It was for the jury to decide whether the condition was caused by the City’s negligence or indifference and the City was not entitled to a peremptory instruction.

 The court instructed the jury, in substance, to find for the plaintiff if her property was damaged by overflow from the sewer line, and if the City knew or, by the exercise of ordinary care, could have known such damage was likely to occur, and by the exercise of ordinary care could have prevented the overflowing and resulting damage.

It seems to us the instructions adequately presented the issues. The City contends the jury should have been instructed to find for it i'f the damage was caused by an “unavoidable occurrence,” or “act of God.” It is sufficient to say on this point that no such instruction was requested. High Splint Coal Co. v. Cowans, 288 Ky. 66, 155 S.W.2d 488.

*384It is also argued that under the instructions the jury was permitted to speculate on what caused the overflowing of the sewer. It will be noted, however, that the instruction authorized a finding for appellee only in the event the City could have discovered and prevented the overflowing by the exercise, of ordinary care. Since the jury returned a verdict for ap-pellee, it must be assumed it found a lack of ordinary care on the part of the City with resulting damage to appellee. We think there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict.

This case’ is closely analogous to City of Louisville v. Cope, *296*Ky. 207, 176 S.W.2d 390, where a judgment was affirmed for $1,000 damages to a residence caused by the accumulation of backwater from a sewer.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I, Drew A. Moyer, Principal Financial Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006 (the “Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Technitrol, Inc. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| Dated:  August 4, 2006 |  | /s/ Drew A. Moyer |
|------------------------|--|-------------------|
|                        |  | Drew A. Moyer     |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be retained by Technitrol, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.        

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

AURENTHIEL GENE YOUNGBLOOD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1944 

[February 21, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Steven J. Levin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017CF001912 C.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.