SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (In accordance with 40 CFRPart 51

- App. V)
SIP Submitted by: Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection

Date Submitted: September 24, 2012 Subject: 2008 LeadNational Ambient Air Quality Standard 110(a)(2) Infrastructure SIP Completeness Review Completed by: Ruth Knapp

## J$~ Date Completed: January 29,2013
Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE

- - - 

## I · EPA REQUIREMENT 

# I STATE SUBMITTAL 

# I (X) 

# I
1. A formal letter ofsubmittal from the Governor orhis 

### 1. SIP transmittal letter dated September 24, 2012 from X designee, requesting EPA approval ofthe plan orrevision Michael L. Krancer, Secretary PADEP to Shawn M. thereof. Garvin ofEPA.



## - 2. Evidence that the State has adopted the planinthe State code 2. Applicable portions of 11O(a)(2) are found inthe PA X prbody ofregulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent SIP at 40 CFRPart 52 or in the state code/body of**~greement** in final form. That evidence shall include the date regulations. ofadoption or final issuance as well as the effective date ofthe tplan, ifdifferent from the adoption/issuance date. Checkto see ifthe regulation, permit, order or consent decree has a sunset or expiration date. Ifso it is not acceptable as a SIP submission. 3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority 3. Pennsylvania's Air Pollution Control Act provides X under State lawto adopt and impJement the plan. authority to adopt and implement the plan. 4. A copy ofactual regulation, or document submitted for 4. The infrastructure submittal which references other**~pproval** and incorporation byreference into the plan, including rules already in the SIP is dated September 2012. X**~ndicatio.n** ofthe changes made to the existing approved plan,--- - EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) !Where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy ofthe official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the**~ppropriate** State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date ofthe regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself.

_ 

# 15. Evidence thatthe State followed all ofthe procedural 

# 5. Yes the transmittal letter and additional materials X requirements ofthe State's laws and constitution in conducting indicate that Pennsylvania followed the procedural

Iand completing the adoption/issuance ofthe plan. requirements for adoption ofthe plan. 6 Public notice dated June 9, 2012 indicated a public comment 16. Evidence thatpublic notice was given ofthe proposed period lasting until July 13, 2012 was provided. X

ichange consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date ofpublication ofsuch notice. 

# 17. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance 

# 7. Yes a public hearing was held as per the public notice ofthe X with the information provided in the public notice and the hearing and commentperiod. State's laws and constitution, ifapplicable. 8. Compilation ofpublic comments and the State's response 8. Public comments and the Commonwealth's response are X hereto. included. Technical Materials 1. Identification ofall regulated pollutants**affect~d** by the plan. 1 The plan pertains to Lead. X 2. Identification ofthe locations ofaffected sources including 2. Generally the plan affects sources statewide and a map of X the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation ofthe locations lead sources is provided.

1and the status ofthe attainment plan for the affected area(s). 

### 13. Quantification ofthe changes in plan allowable emissions 

### 3. No changes will occur to emissions since no newregulations X from the affected sources; estimates ofchanges in current are included in this plan.**~ctual** emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification ofchanges in actual emissions from affected

1sources through calculations ofthe differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result ofthe revision. 

### ,14. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air 4. Since the plan does not modify emissions it will not effect XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) quality standards, prevention ofsignificant deterioration these items. As applicable, air protectionprograms are certified increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and and discussed in the plan. rvisibility, as applicable, are protected ifthe plan is approved**~d** implemented. 5. Modeling information required to support the proposed 5 No actual modeling is required but the ability to do modeling is discussed inthe planunder element K. x trevision, including input data, output data, models used, !ambient monitoring dataused, meteorological data used,**~ustification** for use ofoffsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the I determination ofadequacy ofthe modeling analysis. 6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are 6 This information is found in the PennsylvaniaSIP under X based on continuous emission reduction technology. applicable portions of40 CPR Part 52. I
7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 7. This information is found in the Pennsylvania SIP under X practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, applicable portions of40 CPR Part 52. I !Where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how 8 This information is found inthe Pennsylvania 1SIP under X jcompliance will be determined inpractice. applicable portions of40 CPRPart 52. I 9. Special economic and technologicaljustifications required by 9.NA any applicable EPA policies. (Ifa policy is not appropriate, explain why.)

. 10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a 10.NA maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant I NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.