alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### McGLAMMERY v. STATE.

No. 25323.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 20, 1951.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 1951.

Samuel K. Wasaff, El Paso, for appellant.

William E. Clayton, Dist. Atty., El Paso, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for the offense of assault with intent to murder without malice; the punishment 3 years confinement in the penitentiary.

The evidence shows that appellant inflicted serious injuries upon David Thurston with a knife, which injuries included a long cut on the upper chest which penetrated the right chest cavity and which apparently collapsed the right lung; a cut that penetrated the abdominal cavity and perforated the intestines, and various other wounds of a less serious nature.

■ Appellant.admitted having inflicted such wounds on, Thurston who.pi he had never seen ¡be,fore, but testified, .that he. did s.o while acting in self-defense against an assault made upon him by Thurston with.- a knife which resulted, in. appellant’s arm being, cut open.

The jury rejected the claim, of self-defense, and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain, the verdict is not questioned.

The motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given on February 21, 1951,, and appellant was granted-60 days in which to file his bills of exception.

The time so allowed expired on April 22, 1951, and the one bill of exception presented to the trial court was filed on April 23, 1951. .

This bill was qualified by the trial judge and appellant excepted to such qualifications. It was then refused as incorrect and the court filed his own bill. The court’s bill was likewise filed on April 23, 1951.

The bill of exception, not having been filed within the time allowed .by the court’s order, cannot be considered. See Huber v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 306, 207 S.W.2d 383; Muniz v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 565, 170 S.W.2d 767; and Wilson v. State, 98 Tex.Cr.R. 319, 265 S.W. 697.

However, we have examined the court’s bill and it shows no error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Appellant insists that the bill of exception prepared by the trial court' reflects error.

From this bill of exception it appears that the appellant sought, upon cross-examination of the injured party, to show that he had at one time been charged in á justice court with felony theft. ■

The trial court certifies that the complaint was dismissed for the want of sufficient evidence, and the, charge was neyer presented to the grand jury. '

*430The charge, having been dismissed in the justice court and not having resulted in an indictment, was not the subject of proof, even for impeachment purposes. 45 Tex.Jur., Witnesses, Sec. 246, p. 108; Norton v. State, 120 Tex.Cr.R. 557, 47 S.W.2d 610; Brown v. State, 105 Tex.Cr.R. 605, 289 S.W. 386; Bridges v. State, 99 Tex. Cr.R. 627, 271 S.W. 87.

The action of the trial court in sustaining the state’s objection to proof of such fact was proper.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

Opinion approved by the court.
**Exhibit 32.A****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ending June 30, 2006, of Tennessee GasPipeline Company (the “Company”) as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Stephen C. Beasley, Chairman of the Boardand President,certify (i) that the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ Stephen C. Beasley           Stephen C. Beasley *Chairman of the Board and President* *(Principal Executive Officer)*       August 7, 2006A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Tennessee Gas PipelineCompany and will be retained by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.B****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ending March 31, 2006, of Tennessee GasPipeline Company (the “Company”) as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, John R. Sult, Senior VicePresident, Chief Financial Officer and Controller, certify(i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ John R. Sult           John R. Sult *Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer* *and Controller* *(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)*   May 5, 2006A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Tennessee Gas PipelineCompany and will be retained by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard H. Wills, certify that:

        (1)     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tektronix,
Inc., for the fiscal quarter ending November 27, 2004;

        (2)     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

        (3)     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

        (4)     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

                (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

                (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

        (5)     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                (a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

                (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:  January 5, 2005

/s/ RICHARD H. WILLS
-------------------------------------
Richard H. Wills
President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 12
                               PACIFIC TELECOM, INC.
                 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                           (Dollar amounts in millions)
<CAPTION>
                                  
                                  Nine Months
                                     Ended               Year Ended December 31,      
                                                  _____________________________________
                                  Sept. 30, 1997  1996    1995    1994     1993    1992     
                                  ______________  ____    ____    ____     ____    ____  
<S>                                  <C>        <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>    
Earnings, as defined*:
Income from continuing operations
  before income taxes                 $106.7     $122.7  $186.6  $122.2   $ 82.9  $ 99.8  

Add:
 Fixed charges                          35.2       46.5    54.5    48.6     59.5    63.2    
 Equity losses of less than 50%
   owned persons                          -          -       -       -        -      0.9     
 Minority interest                       2.8        2.4     1.3     1.0      0.6     0.1      
                                       _____      _____   _____   _____    _____   _____   

  Total earnings                      $144.7     $171.6  $242.4  $171.8   $143.0  $164.0  
                                       _____      _____   _____   _____    _____   _____
                                       _____      _____   _____   _____    _____   _____
Fixed charges:
  Interest                             $30.2      $40.8   $42.3   $34.7    $44.3  $ 52.1   
  Interest portion of 
    rental expense                       5.0        5.7    12.2    13.9     15.2    11.1    
                                        ____       ____    ____    ____     ____    ____   

    Total fixed charges                $35.2      $46.5   $54.5   $48.6    $59.5   $63.2   
                                        ____       ____    ____    ____     ____    ____
                                        ____       ____    ____    ____     ____    ____

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       4.1        3.7     4.4     3.5      2.4     2.6    
                                        ____       ____    ____    ____     ____    ____
                                        ____       ____    ____    ____     ____    ____
</TABLE>
[FN]
* For  the  purpose of  computing  these ratios, "earnings" represents the 
  aggregate of (a) income from  continuing operations before income taxes, 
  (b) fixed charges,(c) equity  losses of less than 50% owned persons and
  (d) minority interest. Equity losses of less than 50% owned persons are 
  added to income from continuing operations before income taxes since the 
  Company  does not guarantee the debt of such  persons.  "Fixed Charges"
  consist of  interest  charges  and an  estimated amount representing the
  interest portion of rental expense.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26983]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Networking and Infrastructure 
Research; Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meetings of the Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Networking 
and Infrastructure (1207):

    1. Date/Time: November 7, 2000; 8:00 AM-5:00 PM.
    Place: Room 220, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.

    2. Date/Time: November 13-14, 2000; 8:00 AM-5:00 PM.
    Place: Room 1120, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA.

    3. Date/Time: November 15, 2000; 8:00 AM-5:00 PM.
    Place: Room 1120, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA.

    4. Date/Time: November 21, 2000; 8:00 AM-5:00 PM.
    Place: Room 1175, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA.

    5. Date/Time: December 4-5, 2000; 8:00 AM-5:00 PM.
    Place: Room 1150, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA.

    6. Date/Time: December 6, 2000; 8:00 AM-5:00 PM.
    Place: Room 220, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.

    Type of Meetings: Closed.
    Contact Person: Karen Sollins, Division of Advanced Networking 
Infrastructure Research, Room 1175, National Science Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone (703) 292-8950.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the 
Networking Research and Special Projects Programs as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Purpose of Meetings: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals.
    These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 16, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-26983 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27022]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-3758-000]


Coyote Springs 2, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

October 17, 2000.
    Coyote Springs 2, LLC (Coyote) submitted for filing a rate schedule 
under which Coyote will engage in wholesale electric power and energy 
transactions at market-based rates. Coyote also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, Coyote requested that 
the Commission grant blanket approval of 18 CFR part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Coyote.
    On October 12, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Coyote should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Coyote is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Coyote's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is November 13, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, 
DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27022 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of StockerYale, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Marianne Molleur, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Marianne Molleur   
|Marianne Molleur       
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|November 13, 2006
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSE ANGEL ENRIQUEZ, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00325-CR

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20120D05490)

O R D E R

The Court has considered the agreed motion to consolidate, and concludes the motion 

should be GRANTED. The above styled and numbered cause shall be consolidated with cause 

number’s 08-15-00322-CR, 08-15-00323-CR, and 08-15-00324-CR, Styled Jose Angel Enriquez 

v. The State of Texas, for purposes briefing and oral argument only

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of June, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
# Appendix C

Modeling Analysis Protocol

and Quality Assurance Project Plan

Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation

Division of Air Pollution Control

9 th Floor L&C Annex

401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243

## Introduction

The regional haze modeling was coordinated by th e southeastern regional planning organization, Visibility Improvement - State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS), which is comprised of the ten southeast states (Alabama , Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia) and the local programs and tribal agencies located within these states. VISTAS contracted with ENVIRON International Corp., Alpine Geophysics, LLC and the Univers ity of California Riverside to perform the emissions and air quality modeling for the regional haze state and tribal implementation plans.



### Appendix C.1 contains the modeling protocol submitted by the contractors entitled Modeling Protocol for the VISTAS Phase II Regional Haze Modeling. The modeling protocol documents the meteorological model, emissions model and air quality model that was used for this project. It discusses in detail the configuration of the models, modeling domains, quality assurance objectives, etc.



### Appendix C.2 contains the quality assurance project plan that was developed by the modeling contractors to outline the quality assurance procedures that were used in the modeling process.



### Appendix C.3 contains an article from Atmospheric Environment published in 2006. The article

contains details of modifications made to the secondary organic aerosols (SOA) module in CMAQ, by ENVIRON, to better quantify SOA. This was necessary as preliminary modelingruns showed organic carbon was significantly under-predicted in the summer and this underprediction was determined to be unacceptable because organic carbon is a major contributor to PM mass and visibility impairment in the southeastern United States. The modified SOA module in CMAQ incorporates additional SOA formation based on emissions data from pine forests in Durham, NC. Full details of the SOA module are included in section 4 of the article.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2860 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2860

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the Inspector 
  General of the Office of Personnel Management may use amounts in the 
    revolving fund of the Office to fund audits, investigations, and 
              oversight activities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``OPM IG Act''.
SEC. 2. USE OF OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT REVOLVING FUND FOR 
AUDITS, INVESTIGATIONS, AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES.
    Subsection (e) of section 1304 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
        (1) in paragraph (1), by adding before the period at the end of 
    the first sentence the following: ``, and for the cost of audits, 
    investigations, and oversight activities, conducted by the 
    Inspector General of the Office, of the fund and the activities 
    financed by the fund''; and
        (2) in paragraph (5)--
            (A) by striking ``The Office'' and inserting ``(A) The 
        Office''; and
            (B) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(B) Such budget shall include an estimate from the Inspector 
    General of the Office of the amount required to pay the expenses to 
    audit, investigate, and provide other oversight activities with 
    respect to the fund and the activities financed by the fund.
        ``(C) The amount requested by the Inspector General under 
    subparagraph (B) shall not exceed .33 percent of the total 
    budgetary authority requested by the Office under subparagraph 
    (A).''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```