alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# G **OOD** 

# N **EIGHBOR** 

# E **NVIRONMENTAL** 

# B **OARD F**  **IFTH -**  **FLOOR CONFERENCE ROO M**  **W OODROW**  **W ILSON**  **I NTERNATIONAL**  **C ENTER FOR**  **S CHOLARS**  Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

One Woodrow

Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 **June 1 7, 2010**  **OVERVIEW OF REPORT (3:00**  **- 4:00 PM)**  **Welcome and Introductions** Dolores Wesson, EPA and Designated Federal Officer, GNEB Paul Ganster, San Diego State University and Chair, GNEB **Council on Environmental Quality** Nancy Sutley, Chair C EQ **Environmental Protection Agency** Michelle DePass, Assistant Administrator, OITA **United States of Mexico** Ambassador Arturo Sarukhan **Questions and answers from the press and the public R** **OUNDTABLE D**  **ISCUSSION :**  **A F**  **EDERAL ,**  **S TATE AND**  **L OCA** **L S**  **TAKEHOLDER P**  **ERSPECTIVE (4:00**  **- 5:30PM)**  **M ODERATOR**  **:** Duncan Wood, Director , Department of International Relations, Instituto Tecnólogico Autónomo de México (ITAM); Senior Associate, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS); and

Senior Advisor, Renewable Energy Initiative, Woodrow Wilson Center **Departm ent of State, Office of Mexican Affairs**  Russell Frisbie, Washington Liaison, IBWC **Texas Commission on Environm ental Quality**  Steve Niemeyer, Manager for Border Affairs **Gila Re sources Information Project, New Mexico**  Allyson Siwik , Executive Director **Sonora Environmental Research Institute, Arizona** Ann Marie A. Wolf, President **Cam eron County, Texas**  John Wood, County Commissioner, Precinct 2
Order entered February 13, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01472-CR

ROY RODGERS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1158855-Y

ORDER

The Court GRANTS court reporter Sharon Hazlewood’s February 10, 2013 request for 

an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We ORDER Ms. Hazlewood to file the 

complete reporter’s record by MONDAY, MARCH 4, 2013. 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Sharon 

Hazlewood, official court reporter, Criminal District Court No. 7, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Nancy M. Harvey, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of TenFold Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Nancy M. Harvey                                                                              
|Nancy M. Harvey President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer February 28, 2005
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Triple Net Properties, LLC, the Manager of NNN 2002 Value Fund,LLC (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Anthony W. Thompson     Anthony W. Thompson  *Chief Executive Officer*  Triple Net Properties, LLC,  the Manager of NNN 2002 Value Fund, LLCDate: March 28, 2006       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.     The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2005 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general information language in such filing.
ACTIO N
Pettiford , Mari e (OST > From : Sent : To : Cc : Subject : _ X SlO-110114-02 1
Jeanni e Blak e [jeannieblake@gmail.com ] Thursday

. Januar y13 , 201 1 10:2 5 P M LaHood , Ra y(OST ) Kurland , Susa n (OST) ; Devany , Denni s (OST) ; Sean.pamell@alaska.go v Continuatio n o f Alask a Airlin e Docke t OST-1998-489 9

Dea r Secretary LaHood , I woul dlike t o expres s m y stron g support

for th e selectio n o f

Alask aAirline s t o continu e t o provid e essential ai r servic e t o Cordova , Alaska

. Alaska' s curren t

pattern o f

service , usin g je t

aircraft , meet s crucia l need s that woul db e difficult , i f

no t impossible , t o mee t

withan y othe r

typ e o f servic e o r

aircraf t type : Alaska' s servic e connect s Southeas t Alask apassenger s t o on e o r mor e majo r

communitie s o f

interest , wit

h single-plan e servic e t o Anchorage , Juneau , Ketchika n o r Seattle

. Fro mthes e hubs , ou r community ca

n acces s th e airline' s extensiv e rout e syste man dbenefi t fromit s marketin g relationship s withothe r carriers

. Th e 737-40 0 combinatio n ("combi" ) passenge r an dcarg o aircraft , whic hAlask aAirline s propose s t o continu e usin g on this route , provide s freight , mai l an dcarg o capacity that anon-je t carrie r simpl y canno t

provide

. Further , th e 737

- 40 0 comb i aircraf

t i s equippe dwit hRequire dNavigatio n Performanc e Technolog y precisio n technology,whic h enable s th e airlin e t o reliabl y acces s th e airport durin g inclemen t

weather , thu s reducin g diversion s an d cancellation s and , in turn , enablin g peopl e an dproduct s t o dependabl y reac hth e community

. I n sum , Alaska' s je t servic e i s critical t o th e economi c wel l bein g o f ou r community

. W e are acommercia l fishing famil y an dw e us e Alask aAirline s t o transport ou r direc t marke t salmo n t o Anchorage , Seattle , California , an dArizona

. Alask aAirline s service s ou r busines s need s efficientl y an d professionally

. Cordov ai s asmal l community an dw e mus t trave l t o Anchorag e for

man y medica l needs

. Ai r transportatio n i s crucial

. Fo r thes e reasons , w e respectfiill y urg e th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n t o selec t

Alask aAirline s t o continu e t o provid e essential ai r

servic e t o Southeas t

Alaska , a s th e airlin e ha s successfiill y don e for more tha n thirty years Sincerely , Kor y & Jeanni e Blak e P O Bo x 112 2 Cordova , A K

9957 4 907-424-719 4

U

e n C O
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Dawson v. Gentzler Tool & Die Corp., Slip Opinion No. 2014-Ohio-3957.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

S LIP O PINION N O . 2014-O HIO -3957
T HE S TATE EX REL . D AWSON , A PPELLANT , v . G ENTZLER T OOL & D IE C ORP .
ET AL ., A PPELLEES . [Until this opinion appears in the Oh io Official Reports advance sheets,

it may be cited as State ex rel. Dawson v. Gentzler Tool & Die Corp., Slip Opinion No. 2014-Ohio-3957.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2012-1814—Submitted August 19, 2014—Decided September 17, 2014.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 11AP-1017, 2012-Ohio-4418.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the court of appeals.

__________________ O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , and O’N EILL , JJ., concur.

__________________ Richard L. Williger Co., L.P.A., and Richard L. Williger, for appellant.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 Michael DeWine, Attorney Genera l, and Lydia M. Arko, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

________________________
#### Michael Costagliola, Plaintiff, *v.*Prudential Steamship Corporation, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Kings County,

October 28, 1957.

*Vincent*J. *Lumia,*former attorney for plaintiff, petitioner in person.

*Philip P. Di Gostan&o,*successor attorney, for plaintiff.

*Stapleton, Flynn & Lilly*for defendant.

Louis L. Friedman, J.

Petitioner moves for an order imposing a lien upon the proceeds of this action. He alleges that he is a former attorney for the plaintiff, having been retained in January, 1956. The papers indicate that sometime in May of 1955, the plaintiff had retained still another attorney to represent him in connection with an action for personal injuries which was to be instituted against the defendant herein. When petitioner was retained in 1956, he represented the plaintiff before the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Employees’ Compensation, and there submitted a notice of election to sue defendant as a third party. In May, 1956, suit was instituted in behalf of plaintiff against this defendant in the Federal court by reason of the same accident and injury which was the basis of the retainer of the other attorney in May of 1955. Notwithstanding that two previous attorneys have been engaged, plaintiff in September of 1956, retained his present attorney. The action was instituted by said attorney in this court and is presently pending. In May of 1957, the last attorney moved in the Federal District Court action for an order substituting himself as the attorney in place and stead of the present petitioner, that the petitioner’s fees for services rendered be determined, and that the action itself be consolidated into the present Supreme Court action. Upon examination of the facts, the United States District Court found that there was no diversity of citizenship between plaintiff and defendant and thereupon, on its own motion, dismissed the entire action. The right to an attorney’s lien depends upon the language of section 475 *617of the Judiciary Law, and unless petitioner can bring himself within the terms of that statute, he is not entitled to any relief. Under section 475, the statutory lien of an attorney accrues only to the attorney of record in an action or special proceeding *(Johnson*v. *Jahr,*1 A D 2d 579) and will not attach otherwise even though the attorney may have performed preliminary services for the client *(Matter of Feuerman,*199 Misc. 936). Petitioner not being “ the attorney who appears for a party *”*cannot, accordingly, impress any lien on this action. Any lien which he may have had in the action in the Federal District Court expired upon the dismissal of the said action *(Matter of Cooper [McCauley],*291 N. Y. 255).

Submit order.
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT


To the Board of Directors of
NovaStar Mortgage, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion about NovaStar Mortgage, Inc., and
subsidiaries, (the "Company"), (a wholly owned subsidiary of NovaStar Financial,
Inc.), compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002
included in the accompanying assertion. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's
compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with
the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standard as of and for the year ended December
31, 2002, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Company, and
investors in loans serviced by the Company and their independent auditors for
their evaluation of the Company's compliance with applicable servicing
agreements, and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other
than these specified parties.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
February 14, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 273 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 273

 To eliminate the 2013 statutory pay adjustment for Federal employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2013

  Mr. DeSantis (for himself, Mr. Issa, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. Mica, Mr. 
 Duncan of Tennessee, Mr. Jordan, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Meadows, 
Mr. Yoho, Mr. Massie, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Woodall, Mr. Radel, Mr. Williams, 
 Mr. Lankford, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Rice of South Carolina, Mr. Mullin, Mr. 
   Wenstrup, Mr. Graves of Georgia, Mr. Labrador, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. 
Stewart, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Bentivolio, Mr. Rothfus, Mr. Hall, Mr. Cotton, 
and Mr. Gowdy) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To eliminate the 2013 statutory pay adjustment for Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF 2013 PAY ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 147 of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 
2011 (Public Law 111-242; 5 U.S.C. 5303 note), as amended by section 
114(a) of the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2013 (Public Law 
112-175; 126 Stat. 1316), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking the matter after 
        ``ending on'' and before ``shall be made'' and inserting 
        ``December 31, 2013,''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking the matter after 
        ``ending on'' and before ``no senior executive'' and inserting 
        ``December 31, 2013,''.
    (b) Elimination of Delayed Adjustment.--Section 114(b) of the 
Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2013 is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANASTATEOFMONTANA,v.No.DA22-0353Plaintiff/Appelle,Defendant/Appellant.ROBERTEARLSTAUDENMAYER,MOTIONFOREXTENSIONOFTIMECOMESNOW,RobertEarlStaudenmayer,inproproiapersona,("hereinafterStaudenmayer"),andrespectfullyrequestanextensionoftimeuntilOctober15,2022,inwhichtoprepareandfile,servetheAppellant'sopeningbriefintheabove-entitledmatter.ThisisAppellant'sfirstrequestforan.extension.Staudenmayer'sopeningbriefwasfirstdueSeptember15,2022.Thebasisforthisrequestisduetosaffetyandsecurityissuesoccurringattheprion,combinedwithcovid-19,staffshortageshereatCrossroadsCorrectionalCenter.Opposingcounselhasbeencontactedandhasnotresponded.Theabovesworntounderthepanaltyofperjury.DATEDthis6thofSeptember,2022.By;Rober'tEarlStaudenmayer,perAppellant09/16/2022Case Number: DA 21-0390Cerificate

of service This

is
to certify

that

the above

and foregoing

was duly served upon oppossing counsel

of record

by deposisting

a true and accurate

copy thereof

in the

US mails

on the 1st day of septemebr,2022,

in the prison
mail box, postage prepaidand addressed

to as follows
below to-wit: Attorney General

of Montana Hon. Austin Knudsen,Esq P.O.Box 201401 Helena,Montana 59620-1401 Respondent

By: Robert
Earl StaudenmayerIN THE SUPREME
COURT

OF THE STATE

OF MONTANA No.

DA 22-0353 STATE

OF MONTANA, Plaintiff/Appelle, V. ROBERT
EARL STAUDENMAYER, Defendant/Appellant.

ORDER Upon consideration

of Appellant's

motion

for extension

of time,

and good cause appearing. IT
IS HEREBY ORDERED

that Appellant

is granted

an extension of time

to and including October 15th,2022,within

which

to prepare,file

and serve Appellant's
opening brief

on appeal. By: Supreme CourtJustice
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q DATED
SEPTEMBER 26, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<CIK> 0000094673
<NAME> STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                       454,535
<SECURITIES>                                 246,010
<RECEIVABLES>                                492,689 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  276,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,469,241
<PP&E>                                       301,857 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,031,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        531,701
<BONDS>                                       20,352
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       6,223
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,441,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,031,736
<SALES>                                    1,038,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,480,787
<CGS>                                        567,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                810,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             149,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              203,003
<INCOME-TAX>                                  54,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          148,103
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 148,103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   2.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   2.37
<FN>
   <F1> Asset values for the interim period represent
        net amounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Note: All Price Estimates are based on a minimum of 4 months rental per year.

40

Estimated Temporary Cooling Cost Chart

32

34

36

38

24

26

28

30

16

18

20

22

8

10

12

14

Flow per unit ~ 6945gpm

2

4

6

Gallons/Day Gallons/Minute $'s / Month Estimated # of VTECT-ID3000's

20,000,000 13,889

40,000,000 27,778

60,000,000 41,667

80,000,000 55,556

100,000,000 69,445

120,000,000 83,334

140,000,000 97,223

160,000,000 111,112

180,000,000 125,000

200,000,000 138,889

220,000,000 152,778

240,000,000 166,667

260,000,000 180,556

280,000,000 194,445

300,000,000 208,334

320,000,000 222,223

340,000,000 236,112

360,000,000 250,000

400,000,000 277,778

$120,400.00

380,000,000 263,889

$240,800.00

$361,200.00

$481,600.00

$602,000.00

$722,400.00

$1,565,200.00

$1,685,600.00

$842,800.00

$963,200.00

$1,083,600.00

$1,204,000.00

$1,324,400.00

$1,444,800.00

$2,287,600.00

$2,408,000.00

$1,806,000.00

$1,926,400.00

$2,046,800.00

$2,167,200.00
#### In the Matter of City of Buffalo Street Sanitation Department, Ash and Garbage Division, Petitioner, v Douglas H. White, as Commissioner of Human Rights, et al., Respondents.

Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The determination of respondent that petitioner discriminated against complainants because of their sex in denying them seasonal employment with the Street Sanitation Department was supported by substantial evidence. The award of $10,000 to claimant Julia Remington for humiliation and mental anguish, however, is *979excessive and not supported by the evidence. We modify the determination, therefore, by reducing the award to claimant Julia Remington for humiliation and mental anguish to $5,000, as recommended by the Administrative Law Judge. (Executive Law § 298 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.