alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 28,
2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of SFX
Entertainment, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 1999, in each of the following:

     1.  Registration Statement No. 333-88741 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1999
         Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan;

     2.  Registration Statement No. 333-58737 on Form S-8 pertaining to the
         1998 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan;

     3.  Registration Statement No. 333-88473 on Form S-8 pertaining to the
         Director Deferred Stock Ownership Plan;

     4.  Registration Statement No. 333-76123 on Form S-3 pertaining to 118,000
         shares of Class A Common Stock; and

     5.  Registration Statement No. 333-57511 on Form S-1 pertaining to
         2,618,448 shares of Class A Common Stock.


                                                  Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York
April 28, 2000
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

C AMPUS EYE MANAGEMENT,
LLC

,

Defendant Below, Appellant,

v.

E. BRUCE DIDONATO

,

Plaintiff Below

, Appellee

. § § No. 93 , 20 2 4 § § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. 20 2 3

- 0671 § § § § §

Submitted: A pril 2 , 20 2 4
Decided: April 12 , 20 2 4

Before VALIHURA

, TRAYNOR

, and LEGROW

, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of th e notice to show cause and the response s , it appears

to the Court that :

(1) In this action under 6 Del. C. § 18

- 110 concerning management of a

limited liability company, the Court of Chancery awarded summary judgment in

favor of the appellee, E. Bruce DiDonato, holding that DiDonato is the manager of

Campus Eye Management, LLC (the “MSO”) . The court also held the MSO in

contempt for violating a status quo order and ordered that DiDonato was entitled to

recover the reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses that he incurred in bringing the

contempt motion. The court directed the parties to “confer on a schedule for2

submissions to resolve the fees and expenses DiDonato may recover as a sanction

for the MSO’s contempt.” 1

(2) The MSO appealed. T he Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing

the MSO to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to comply

with Supreme Court Rule 42 when taking an appeal from an apparent interlocutory

order

. In response to the notice to show cause, the MSO argues that the Court of

Chancery’s decision is final and appealable because the issue of fees is a collateral

matter and DiDonato has not timely filed a fee application.

(3) Absent compliance with Supreme Court Rule 42, the appellate

jurisdiction of this Court is limited to the review of final orders. 2 “ A n order is

deemed final and appealable if the trial court has declared its intention that the order

be the court’s final act in disposing of all justiciable matters within its jurisdiction.” 3

T he Court of Chancery directed the parties to take further action in the case , and the

amount of attorneys’ fees for which the MSO is responsible remains unresolved

.

The appeal is therefore interlocutory and must be dismissed. 4

1 DiDonato v. Campus Eye Mgmt., LLC , 2024 WL 368112 , at *11 (Del. Ch. Jan. 31, 2024).

2 Salzberg v. Sciabacucchi , 2019 WL 549039 , at *1 (Del. Feb. 12, 2019) ; see also id. (stating that it was for the Court of Chancery to decide in the first instance whether a motion for fees was timely filed)

. 3 Wollner v. PearPop, Inc. , 2022 WL 2903103 , at *1 (Del. July 21, 2022) ; see also Gaffin v. Teledyne, Inc. , 1991 WL 181488, at *1 (Del. Aug. 23, 1991) (“An order is final and ripe for appeal when the trial court has clearly declared its intention that the order be the court’s final act in a case.” (internal quotations omitted)).

4 See, e.g.

, W

ollner , 2022 WL 2903103 (dismissing appeal as interlocutory where the amount of a fee award remained unresolved).3

N OW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor
Justice
Exhibit 32.1

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Norman G. Maxwell, the Chief Financial Officer of Rosedale Decorative
Products Ltd. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

     (1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year
          ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: August 30, 2004



                                           /s/ NORMAN G. MAXWELL
                                           ------------------
                                           Name: Norman G. Maxwell
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

Directorate Identifier: 2011

- NM

- 057

- AD

**Costs:** Labor per airplane ( 3 work hours x $8 5 /hour) $ 255 Parts per airplane $ + N/A Cost per airplane $ 255 Number of U.S.

- registered airplanes x 0 Total fleet cost $ 0

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a signifi cant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska , where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

The Board of Directors 

J. Crew Group, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration statement onForm S-8 for the J. Crew Group, Inc. 2003 Equity Incentive Plan of our report dated April 24, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of J. Crew Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 28, 2006 and January 29, 2005,and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and changes in stockholders’ deficit for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 28, 2006, and the related financial statement schedule, which reportappears in the January 28, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K/A of J. Crew Group, Inc. 

 

Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” in the thirdquarter of fiscal 2003. 

 

New York, New York 

June 13, 2006
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Annual Report of Midwest Banc Holdings,    Inc. (the “Company”) on    Form 10-K    for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with    the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2007    (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify,    pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted    pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,    that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.       /s/  James    J. Giancola    Name:   James J. Giancola    Title:     President and              Chief    Executive Officer     Date: March 15, 2007       /s/  Name:    Daniel R. Kadolph    Name:   Daniel R. Kadolph    Title:     Executive Vice President and              Chief    Financial Officer     Date: March 15, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JANUARY 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                              12
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       22
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                        203
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   294
<PP&E>                                             166
<DEPRECIATION>                                      56
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              151
<BONDS>                                            298
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              130
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       (202)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       422
<SALES>                                            823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   834
<CGS>                                              465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    21
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     7
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (32)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (5)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (27)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (5)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (31)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### DRIGGS v. STATE.

No. 26381.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 29, 1953.

Freels, Elliott & Nall, by Rayburn Nall, Sherman, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*312BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the unlawful possession of- intoxicating liquor in: a dry area; -punishment assessed at a fine of $100.

On September 27, 1952, two members of the Police Department’of the City of Deni-son were parked on Washington Street in' that city when appellant drove by in his automobile between 30 and 35 miles per hour. They started following him and appellant increased the speed of his car to between 70 and 80 miles per hour, and ran a stop sign while the officers were in pursuit. The officers were in sight of him at all times and, after travelling some nine blocks, appellant drove into the driveway at his home with the officers stopping the police car immediatley behind appellant’s in the driveway. There were two men in each car and, as the cars came to a stop, the four men got out of the cars .at. approximately the same time.

Louis Winchester, the driver of the police car, met appellant, at the rear of. appellant’s car and told appellant' at that time that he was under arrest. The police officers then searched appellant’s car and found therein eight one-half pint bottles of whiskey, which were later introduced in evidence. - ■

Upon the admitted absence of a''search warrant, appellant contends that- the court erred in admitting..in evidence the whiskey found upon the search of his automobile, on the ground that the search was not authorized as incident to his arrest for a traffic violation,-nor was probable cause shown authorizing such search and seizure. '

The propriety of the admission of this testimony is not before us, since the appellant reserved no exception to the ruling of the court, and since the appellant proved by his own witness, Murrell Stanford, that the whiskey' was in the car.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27066]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Notice of Availability of A Novel Quantum-Well for Exclusive, 
Partially Exclusive or Non-Exclusive Licenses

AGENCY: U.S. Army Research Laboratory, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the general availability 
of exclusive, partially exclusive or non-exclusive licenses relative to 
a novel quantum-well technology as described in the U.S. Patent 
#5,579,331; ``Delta-strained quantum-well semiconductor lasers and 
optical amplifiers''; Shen, et al.; November 26, 1996. Licenses shall 
comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael D. Rausa, U.S. Army Research 
Laboratory, Office of Research and Technology Applications, ATTN: 
AMSRL-CS-TT/Bldg 459, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21005-5425, 
Telephone: (410) 278-5028.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-27066 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
```
---

July 24,
2013

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Amarc Resources Ltd. (the "Company")
|--- | ------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 20-F          
|    | Consent of Expert                   

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
20-F annual report for the year ended March 31, 2013 (the Annual Report), to
be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC).

I, Reno Pressacco, P.Geo., hereby consent to the use of my name
in connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the
resource estimate in the following technical report (the "Technical Report"):

- Technical Report on the Initial Mineral Resource Estimate for the Newton
  Project, Central British Columbia, Canada, amended December 19, 2012

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Report related to me in the Annual
Report.

Yours truly,

|(Signed) | **Reno
      Pressacco** | 
|-------- | -------------------------- | 
|         |                            | 
|Name:    | Reno Pressacco, P.Geo.     | 
|Title:   | Principal Geologist        | 
|         | RPA Inc.                   | 

|                                                                                              |               
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------
|RPA Inc.55 University Ave. Suite 501 | Toronto, ON,
      Canada M5J 2H7 | T+1 (416) 947 0907 | www.rpacan.com

---
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 288 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 

children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2013 

Mr. MICHAUD (for himself and Mr. WALZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

maximum age for children eligible for medical care under 

the CHAMPVA program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CHAMPVA Children’s 

5 Protection Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE FOR CHILDREN ELIGI7 BLE FOR MEDICAL CARE UNDER CHAMPVA 

8 PROGRAM. 

9 (a) INCREASE.—Section 1781(c) of title 38, United 

10 States Code, is amended— 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 288 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘twenty-three’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘twenty-six’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘twenty-third birthday’’ and in4 serting ‘‘twenty-sixth birthday’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to medical care pro7 vided on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
DENY; and Opinion Filed October 14, 2013. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 01350

- CV
IN RE TODD PRUETT , Relator
On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 014518


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lewis Relator contends the trial judge erred in granting a motion to dismiss. The facts and

issues ar e well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

- 40 (Tex. 1992) ( orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

131350F.P05 /David Lewis/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Tooke, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of AmeriFirst
Fund I, LLC (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended
      December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

April 14, 2005
                                       /s/ John Tooke
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John Tooke Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to AmeriFirst Fund I, LLC and will be
retained by AmeriFirst Fund I, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5493 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain artificial filament 

single yarn. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

artificial filament single yarn. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ARTIFICIAL FILAMENT SINGLE YARN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.26.12 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 artificial filament single yarn (other than sewing thread), 

7 not put up for retail sale, of viscose rayon, untwisted or 

8 with a twist not exceeding 120 turns/m) is amended by 

9 striking the date in the effective period column and insert10 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5493 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Continuity Agreement - Paul R. Shlanta


    
      

      

    

     

    EXHIBIT
      10.7

    


    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

    To: Paul
      R.
      Shlanta

    


    From: D.
      Raymond Riddle

     

    
      Re: 
        Notice
        Regarding and Amendment to Your Continuity Agreement Dated December 1,
        2003

    

    


    Date: February
      24, 2006

    


    Pursuant
      to Section 2.1 of the Continuity Agreement among you, AGL Resources Inc. and
      AGL
      Services Company, dated December 1, 2003 (the “Agreement”) this notice is being
      furnished to inform you that the Agreement will not be extended beyond the
      last
      date of its now current Term, November 30, 2007. 

    


    Furthermore,
      pursuant to Section 7.6 of the Agreement, and in consideration of ten dollars
      ($10.00) to be paid to you and other good and valuable consideration, the
      receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Section 1.16(b) of
      the
      Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

    


    (b)
      any
      adverse change in the Executive's rate of annual base salary or annual incentive
      compensation opportunity (i.e., annual cash bonus opportunity under the Annual
      Incentive Plan or a successor plan) from the rate of annual base salary and
      annual incentive compensation opportunity in effect as of the earliest of the
      date of the Announcement, the date of a Change in Control or the date of the
      Consummation of a Change in Control Transaction;

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have executed this Amendment and
      Notice to be effective as of the date and year first written above.

    


    COMPANY:

    


    AGL
      RESOURCES, INC.


    


    By:
       /s/
      D.
      Raymond Riddle   

    Title:
      Interim President and Chief Executive Officer

    


    


    EXECUTIVE:

    


    /s/
      Paul R. Shlanta    

    SIGNATURE
      

    


    [THIS
      DOCUMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE.]