alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PALMER v. STATE.

No. 24479.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 1, 1950.

H. G. Woodruff, Decatur, L. W. Sampson, Decatur, M. W. Burch, Decatur, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of murder with malice in the killing of Louis Drain by shooting him with a gun. The jury rejected appellant’s claim of self-defense, and declined to favorably act on his application for suspension of sentence. His punishment was assessed at eight years in the penitentiary.

The killing occurred on Christmas Day in 1947 in the town of Newark in Wise County.

The state offered in evidence the coat worn by the deceased, which had two holes in the -back. Appellant’s objection to the introduction in evidence of the coat and to its being exhibited to the jury was overruled, but the court, in admitting the evidence, limited it to the showing of the powder marks on the garment about the two holes identified as bullet holes.

Many of appellant’s bills of exceptions were qualified by the trial judge, and a majority of those qualified show that appellant duly excepted to such qualifications. Such exception has the effect of destroying the qualification and in the absence of bills filed by the court as his own, we are required to consider appellant’s bill as approved without qualification. See Winfrey v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 670, 65 S.W.2d 297, 298; and Chinn v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 555, 177 S.W.2d 68.

As so considered, appellant’s Bill of Exception No. 8 relating to the introduction and exhibition of the coat presents error; in fact, it certifies that prejudicial error was committed by the trial court.

The trial judge in this bill certifies that the coat was introduced over the objection of the appellant; that it was exhibited in the presence and view of the jury; that it was in a dirty, filthy and bloodstained condition; that the ruling of the court in so admitting the coat for such limited purpose was error “for the reason that there was no issue in the case which could be solved by such exhibition, testimony and evidence, such action was highly damaging, harmful and prejudicial to the rights of the defendant;” that the 'limitation attempted to be placed on the purpose of the evidence was insufficient to remove the injury, damage and prejudice done to appellant.

Such certification of error requires that the case be reversed. See Ross v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 225 S.W.2d 189; and cases there cited.

*635Under the facts here, testimony, that on a prior occasion a gun was taken by the sheriff from a car in which appellant was riding should not have been admitted.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2789 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2789

  To delay enrollment in qualified health plans in State or Federally 
  facilitated Exchanges until 1 year after final rules are published 
   establishing the verification and other procedures to be used to 
 implement section 1411 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
  Act and carrying out sections 6055 and 6056 of the Internal Revenue 
                             Code of 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2013

 Mrs. Ellmers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To delay enrollment in qualified health plans in State or Federally 
  facilitated Exchanges until 1 year after final rules are published 
   establishing the verification and other procedures to be used to 
 implement section 1411 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
  Act and carrying out sections 6055 and 6056 of the Internal Revenue 
                             Code of 1986.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``DEFECT Act (Delaying Enrollment in 
Federal Exchanges to Certify Trust) of 2013''.

SEC. 2. DELAY ENROLLMENT IN QUALIFIED HEALTH PLANS IN STATE OR 
              FEDERALLY FACILITATED EXCHANGES UNTIL 1 YEAR AFTER 
              PUBLICATION OF RULES ESTABLISHING VERIFICATION AND OTHER 
              EXCHANGE PROCEDURES AND CARRYING OUT COVERAGE REPORTING 
              REQUIREMENTS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no individual may be 
enrolled in a qualified health plan offered through an Exchange under 
section 1311 or 1321 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
(42 U.S.C. 18031, 18041) until 1 year after the date that there is 
published in the Federal Register--
            (1) a final rule that establishes the verification and 
        other procedures to be used to implement section 1411 of such 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 18081); and
            (2) a final rule to carry out sections 6055 and 6056 of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE ARREAGA GONZALEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 70873

Agency No. A200

- 098

- 024

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 8, 2020 * *

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Jorge Arreaga Gonzalez

, a native and citizen of Mexico

, petitions for review

of the Board of Imm igration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT” ). We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 70873

agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir.

2006). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Arreaga

Gonzalez failed to establish the harm he experienced or fears was or would be on

account of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir.

2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by

theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”).

Thus, Arreaga Gonzalez’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Arreaga Gonzalez failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico

. See

Aden v. Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009) ; see also Guo v. Sessions

, 897

F.3d 1208, 1217 (9th Cir. 2018) (insufficient likelihood of torture).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
Exhibit 31

                            Section 302 Certification

I, Douglas K. Johnson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
     8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period
     included in the year covered by this annual report, of Allstate Life Global
     Funding Trust 2005-7;

2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
     does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
     material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
     the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
     to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
     servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included
     in these reports;

4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor
     and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and
     based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under
     that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and
     trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5.   The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
     compliance by the trustee and the depositor with the minimum servicing or
     similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
     accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
     Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set
     forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included
     in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Allstate Life Insurance
Company and J.P. Morgan Trust Company National Association and their respective
officers and agents.

Date:    March 28, 2006

By:      /s/ Douglas K. Johnson
         -----------------------------------
         Name:  Douglas K. Johnson
         Title:  President
Exhibit 31.2

                            ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

      I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates,
Motorola Debenture-Backed Series 2002-14 Trust (the "Trust"), certify that:

   1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the Trust
      and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports
      of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in respect of periods
      included in the year covered by this annual report of the Trust;

   2. Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a whole,
      does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
      a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
      circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
      the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

   3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
      provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee under
      the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in such
      distribution reports is included in such reports; and

   4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee
      under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my
      knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has fulfilled
      its obligations under that agreement.



Date: March 26, 2008

/s/ David Kolibachuk
-----------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
#### In re Estate of Fetzer: Clausen, Appellant, *v.*Fetzer, Exr., et al., Appellees.

(No. 28053

Decided March 6, 1940.)

*Messrs. Halle, Hater, Berick & McNulty*and *Mr. Ben P. Ratt,*for appellant.

*Mr. Harvey E. Elliott,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
#### Burse et al., Appellees, *v.*Harold et al., Appellants.

(No. 27803

Decided December 20, 1939.)

*Mr. Clarence H. Royan*and *Mr. H. M. Goldwasser,*for appellees.

*Mr. Alexander H.*Martin, for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS**

**. .**  **AUSTIN**

**GROVER**

**SELLERS Al-roRNEr** 

**OCNERIL**

tsrioreble

i&rry i&;~ge

Srozier Cualmwn axld

ExeoutiveDirector 'Texss Unemployment

Colnpensatiqn

Co~~~nission Brown Building Au8tin, Texas

Dear Sir: Opinion 240. O-7503

on ttke two que
191 of tne Dopartmultaf th LegielRture

apply to he Taxa Unemployment ither the husband or the 6 employedby another erntmnt of Texas?

vember 16, 1946, the United State8 rioti till **be** returnedto the State **d** will booom a part of the organimTexas Unemploymukt G~pSnaatiOn Corninission.Xi11 the above referred to seation of the Wpartmental ApWopriatiori Bill apply to tiioae persons now employedby the Unfted States Smployment%rvica when that merger is completed?

### 308
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                             163
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         25
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,839
<PP&E>                                           2,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,946
<BONDS>                                            454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,867
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,206
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     87
<INCOME-TAX>                                        35
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 52
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        52
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the consolidated financial statements or notes
thereto.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, CIT Capital Trust I Securities-Backed Series 2002-15 Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
            Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
            servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in
            respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
            report of the Trust;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as
            a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
            or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered
            by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
            provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
            under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion
            in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
            based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
            Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

Date: March 28, 2005



         /s/ David J. Kolibachuk
------------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1345-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Florida, (FEMA-1345-DR), dated October 4, 2000, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 6, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the Public Assistance program to the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of October 4, 2000: 

Miami-Dade and Broward Counties for Public Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

Larry Zensinger, 

Division Director, Human Services Division. 

[FR Doc. 00-26535 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 00-77] 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 00-77 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: October 5, 2000.

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 60648)          ( print page 60649)          ( print page 60650)          ( print page 60651)    

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[FR Doc. 00-26176  Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C