alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION

BRYNNE SOUKUP,

Plaintiff, 

Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-648-RP 

v. 

FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. and 

FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS, LLC, 

Defendants. 

________________________________/

ORDER

Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Substitute Counsel is hereby granted. Brett 

C. Beeler is hereby substituted as attorney-in-charge for Plaintiff, BRYNNE 

SOUKUP.

SIGNED AND ENTERED this ______ day of ____________________, 

2021.

__________________________________

ROBERT L. PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 40-1 Filed 08/03/21 Page 1 of 1
|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of                the Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                           |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/              Michael J.              Cavaleri                                                              |   |   |        |
| Michael                J. CavaleriChief                Executive OfficerChief                Financial Officer |   |   |        |

----
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of J.Crew Group, Inc.



|                           |  |                        |  |                                          
|-------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary         |  | State of Incorporation |  | Name under which Subsidiary Does Business
|J. Crew Operating Corp.    |  | Delaware               |  | J.Crew Operating Corp.                   
|J. Crew Inc.               |  | New Jersey             |  | J.Crew Inc.                              
|Grace Holmes, Inc.         |  | Delaware               |  | J.Crew Retail Stores                     
|H.F.D. No. 55, Inc.        |  | Delaware               |  | J.Crew Factory Stores                    
|Madewell, Inc.             |  | Delaware               |  | Madewell Retail Stores                   
|J.Crew Virginia, Inc.      |  | Virginia               |  | J.Crew Virginia, Inc.                    
|J.Crew International, Inc. |  | Delaware               |  | J.Crew International, Inc.               
|C&W Outlet, Inc.*          |  | New York               |  | C&W Outlet, Inc.                         
|ERL, Inc.*                 |  | New Jersey             |  | ERL, Inc.                                



|* | Inactive subsidiary
|- | -------------------
IB 

Union Calendar No. 185 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2871 

[Report No. 113–258] 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to modify the composition of the 

southern judicial district of Mississippi to improve judicial efficiency, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2013 

Mr. COBLE (for himself, Mr. WATT, Mr. HOLDING, and Mr. THOMPSON of 

Mississippi) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

NOVEMBER 12, 2013 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2871 RH

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to modify the composition of the southern judicial district of Mississippi 

to improve judicial efficiency, and for other purposes. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2871 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REALIGNMENT OF SOUTHERN JUDICIAL DIS4 TRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. 

5 Section 104(b) of title 28, United States Code, is 

6 amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘Southern District 

8 ‘‘(b) The southern district comprises four divisions. 

9 ‘‘(1) The Northern Division comprises the coun10 ties of Copiah, Hinds, Holmes, Issaquena, Kemper, 

11 Lauderdale, Leake, Madison, Neshoba, Newton, 

12 Noxubee, Rankin, Scott, Simpson, Sharkey, Smith, 

13 Warren, and Yazoo. 

14 Court for the Northern Division shall be held at Jackson. 

15 ‘‘(2) The Southern Division comprises the coun16 ties of George, Greene, Hancock, Harrison, Jackson, 

17 Pearl River, and Stone. 

18 Court for the Southern Division shall be held at Gulfport. 

19 ‘‘(3) The Eastern Division comprises the coun20 ties of Clarke, Covington, Forrest, Jasper, Jefferson 

21 Davis, Jones, Lamar, Lawrence, Marion, Perry, 

22 Wayne, and Walthall. 

23 Court for the Eastern Division shall be held at Hatties24 burg. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 2871 RH

1 ‘‘(4) The Western Division comprises the coun2 ties of Adams, Amite, Claiborne, Franklin, Jeffer3 son, Lincoln, Pike, and Wilkinson. 

4 Court for the Western Division shall be held at Natchez.’’. 

5 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

6 This Act and the amendment made by this Act shall 

7 take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 185 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2871 

[Report No. 113–258] 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to modify 

for other purposes. of Mississippi to improve judicial efficiency, and the composition of the southern judicial district 

NOVEMBER 12, 2013 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration


Working Group on Phased Retirement Advisory Committee on Employee 
Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public meeting will be held on Monday, November 13, 2000, of the 
Working Group on Phased Retirement of the Advisory Committee on 
Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans.
    The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 1 p.m. to 
approximately 3:30 p.m. in room N-5437 A-C, U.S. Department of Labor 
Building, Second and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210, is 
for working group members to finalize the recommendations they will 
include in their report to the Secretary of Labor.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to the topic by submitting 20 copies on or before November 
6, 2000, to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory 
Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5677, 200 Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210. Individuals or representatives of 
organizations wishing to address the Working Group should forward their 
request to the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral 
presentations will be limited to 10 minutes, but an extended statement 
may be submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities, who 
need special accommodations, should contact Sharon Morrissey by 
November 6, at the address indicated in this notice.
    Organizations or individuals also may submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above 
address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the 
meeting if received on or before November 6.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 19th day of October 2000.
Leslie Kramerich,
Acting Assitant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-27261 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27270]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-48-000]


Egan Hub Partners, L.P.; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 18, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 13, 2000, Egan Hub Partners, L.P. 
(Egan) tendered for filing in compliance with Order No. 587-L, Final 
Rule, issued on June 30, 2000, in Docket No. RM96-1-014, and the 
Commission's subsequent order granting clarification issued on 
September 28, 2000 in Docket No. RM96-1-016. The order granting 
clarification stated that ``pipelines seeking an exemption from the 
imbalance trading requirement are required to file within 15 days of 
the order to show why they should not be required to implement 
imbalance trading.''
    Egan states that copies of the filing were mailed to all affected 
customers of Egan and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before October 25, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27270 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 6

Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-14 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-14 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-14 Filed 03/05/21 Page 3 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-14 Filed 03/05/21 Page 4 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-14 Filed 03/05/21 Page 5 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-14 Filed 03/05/21 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

of

Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Thomas W. Hofmann, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sunoco, Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Sunoco, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |                          
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: October 31, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas W. Hofmann    
|                       |  |  |  | Thomas W. Hofmann        
|                       |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. as of
March 31, 1997, and for the three months ended, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          55,862
<SECURITIES>                                    38,236
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,484
<INVENTORY>                                     32,795
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               318,228
<PP&E>                                       2,824,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                 879,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,315,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          654,268
<BONDS>                                        983,911
<COMMON>                                        61,223
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              279
<PREFERRED>                                     28,720
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,942,406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,315,866
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               318,178
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  275,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,838
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,617
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 3.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**OF**

**AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**BOSTON LIFE SCIENCES, INC.**

 

**Pursuant to Section 242 of the**

**Delaware General Corporation Law**

 

BOSTONLIFE SCIENCES, INC. (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY: 

 

1. The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed in the office of the Secretary ofState of Delaware on March 29, 1996 and amendments thereto were subsequently duly filed and recorded (the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation together with such amendments shall be hereinafter referred to as the“Certificate”). 

 

2. That the Board of Directors ofthe Corporation duly adopted resolutions proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Certificate: 

 

RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors hereby approves and recommends to the Company’s stockholders that the first sentence of Article FOURTH of theCertificate be, and it hereby is, subject to stockholder approval at the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Corporation, amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

 

“FOURTH: The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 81,000,000 to be dividedinto (a) 80,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, (b) 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of which 25,000 are designated Series A Preferred Stock, 500,000 are designated Series D Preferred Stock, and800 are designated Series E Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, with the powers, preferences and other rights as described in the Certificate of Designations related thereto.” 

 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that all other provisions of the Certificate, as heretofore amended, and all exhibits, attachments andcertificates to the Certificate shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 

 

3. That thereafter a majority of the holders of the stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon voted in favor of the Amendment at a meeting of the stockholders duly held on July 30, 2004. 

 

4. That the foregoing amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation was dulyadopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Boston Life Sciences, Inc. has caused this Certificate to be executed by its duly authorized officers this 5th day of August, 2004.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2867 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for the recognition 

of attending physician assistants as attending physicians to serve hospice 

patients. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2013 

Mr. TERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for the recognition of attending physician assistants as 

attending physicians to serve hospice patients. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Hospice Care 

5 Access Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2867 IH

1 SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF ATTENDING PHYSICIAN ASSIST2 ANTS AS ATTENDING PHYSICIANS TO SERVE 

3 HOSPICE PATIENTS. 

4 (a) RECOGNITION OF ATTENDING PHYSICIAN AS5 SISTANTS AS ATTENDING PHYSICIANS TO SERVE HOS6 PICE PATIENTS.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(dd)(3)(B) of 

8 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(dd)(3)(B)) 

9 is amended— 

10 (A) by striking ‘‘or nurse’’ and inserting ‘‘, 

11 the nurse’’; and 

12 (B) by inserting ‘‘, or the physician assist13 ant (as defined in such subsection)’’ after ‘‘sub14 section (aa)(5))’’. 

15 (2) CLARIFICATION OF HOSPICE ROLE OF PHY16 SICIAN ASSISTANTS.—Section 1814(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) of 

17 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

18 1395f(a)(7)(A)(i)(I)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or a 

19 physician assistant’’ after ‘‘a nurse practitioner’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall apply to items and services furnished on 

22 or after January 1, 2014. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc.
Santa Ana, California

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc.'s 2006
Stock Incentive Plan, of our report dated June 26, 2009 relating to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Integrated Healthcare
Holdings, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended March 31, 2009. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph
regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Costa Mesa, California
June 26, 2009
# State of Alaska

40 CFR Part 52 - Subpart C

State Implementation Plan

Materials Incorporated by Reference

40 CFR 52.70(c) and (d)

March 4, 2014

US EPA Region 10

Office of Air, Waste and Toxics

1200 Sixth Avenue

Seattle, WA 98101
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONALD LEWIS DAVIS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

BARBARA BLANCKENSEE; HUGH J. 

HURWITZ, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-15626 

D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00385-JGZ-PSOT 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2021**

Before: FERNANDEZ, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Donald Lewis Davis appeals pro se from the district court’s 

judgement dismissing for failure to state a claim his action regarding his prison 

orientation and loss of good time credits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 

§ 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Davis’s action because Davis failed to 

allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 

341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are construed liberally, a 

plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim); see also Wolff v. 

McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-68 (1974) (due process requirements for prison 

disciplinary proceedings); Cousins v. Lockyer, 568 F.3d 1063, 1070 (9th Cir. 2009) 

(failure to follow internal prison policy does not amount to a constitutional 

violation).

To the extent that Davis challenged the loss of good time credits, the district 

court properly dismissed Davis’s claim because he failed to allege facts sufficient 

to show that the disciplinary proceeding resulting in the loss of good time credits 

had been invalidated. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994) (if “a 

judgment in favor of the plaintiff would necessarily imply the invalidity of his 

conviction or sentence . . . the complaint must be dismissed unless the plaintiff can 

demonstrate that the conviction or sentence has already been invalidated”); see 

also Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 648, (1997) (extending Heck to prison 

disciplinary proceedings resulting in the loss of good-time credits).

AFFIRMED.
#### PARKER v. STATE.

No. 23786.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 21, 1948.

Hubert Bookout and O. H. Woodrow, both of Sherman, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is murder. The punishment assessed is confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of four years.

Appellant brings forward fifteen bills of exception which we are unable to properly appraise in view of the fact that the statement of facts was not approved by the trial court until the 5th day of June which was 91 days after notice of appeal was given. Therefore, we cannot consider the same. The clerk of the court was not authorized to file the same .before the trial court had approved it. In support of the opinion here expressed, we refer to the following authorities: Brady v. State, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 368, 187 S.W.2d 224; McHenry v. State, 141 Tex.Cr.R. 118, 147 S.W.2d 488; and Hollingsworth v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 205 S.W.2d 604. The State’s attorney suggests that the statement of facts be stricken, which is accordingly done.

The indictment seems to be in due form, therefore, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

PER CURIAM. .

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.