alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Rose Crane, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MELA Sciences, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. [Reserved];

4. The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operations of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)
any fraud whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/    Rose CraneRose CranePresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: April 1, 2014
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0113. DANNY O. NEAL v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE

CORP.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following

an adverse ruling, Danny O. Neal filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the superior

court. On September 27, 2016, the superior court issued an order declining to

sanction Neal’s petition. Neal filed this application for discretionary review on

October 5, 2016. We lack jurisdiction.

Generally, an application for discretionary review must be filed within 30 days

of entry of the order sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The underlying

subject matter of an appeal, however, controls over the relief sought in determining

the proper appellate procedure. See Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448

SE2d 192) (1994). The underlying subject matter here is a dispossessory judgment. 

Under OCGA § 44-7-56, an appeal from a dispossessory judgment must be filed

within seven days of the date the judgment was entered. See Ray M. Wright, Inc. v.

Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521, 522-523 (521 SE2d 456) (1999). Neal’s application for

discretionary appeal is untimely, as it was filed eight days after the superior court’s

order was entered. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review this application,

which is hereby DISMISSED.

November 04, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/04/2016
#### The State, ex rel. Wheeling Steel Corp., *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio.

(No. 27801

Decided January 24, 1940.)

*242
      *Mr. Gordon B. Kinder,*for relator.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. E. P. Felker,*for respondent.

By the Court.

The Industrial Commission is empowered in the first instance to determine whether an application for compensation has been made by a claimant.

It is well established by this court that the extraordinary writ of prohibition may not be employed as a convenient short cut to the final determination of the rights of litigants in place of the available ordinary, adequate remedies or to prevent an anticipated er*243roneous judgment. 32 Ohio Jurisprudence, 572, 586, Sections 9 and 24; *State, ex rel. Norris,*v. *Hodapp, Judge,*135 Ohio St., 26, 18 N. E. (2d), 984, and cases cited therein.

Should the Industrial Commission find that an application for compensation was made within two years after the injury as required by Section 1465-72», General Code, and award compensation, an adequate remedy at law is provided under Section 1465-74, General Code, whereby the relator, when sued for the compensation so fixed, may contest all jurisdictional facts necessary to he determined by the commission before maidug an award. *Pittsburg Coal Co.*v. *Industrial Commission,*108 Ohio St., 185, 140 N. E., 684.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained and a writ of prohibition denied.

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Day, J., not participating.
Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 114-3 Filed 10/28/22 Page 1 of 6
GUERRA 000141

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 114-3 Filed 10/28/22 Page 2 of 6
GUERRA 000142

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 114-3 Filed 10/28/22 Page 3 of 6
GUERRA 000143

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 114-3 Filed 10/28/22 Page 4 of 6
GUERRA 000144

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 114-3 Filed 10/28/22 Page 5 of 6
GUERRA 000145

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 114-3 Filed 10/28/22 Page 6 of 6
Amendment to the Charles Schwab Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.285 
  
 AMENDMENT 
 TO THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION 
 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 Section 9(a) of The Charles Schwab Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan
(the “LTIP”) is amended in its entirety to read as follows, effective for target awards made on or after July 19, 2004: 
  

	 	“(a)	Death or Disability. If a Participant’s employment is terminated as a result of death or disability at any time after the first two years of a Performance Period (and
before completion of the Performance Period), such Participant or Participant’s estate shall be entitled to receive the entire Award such Participant would have been entitled to, based on Company performance and payable at the time Awards are
paid to all other Participants for such Performance Period. If a Participant’s employment is terminated as a result of death or disability at any time during the first two years of a Performance Period (and before completion of the Performance
Period), such Participant shall be entitled to receive a pro-rated Award, based on the number of whole months in the Performance Period prior to the Participant’s termination and payable at the time Awards are paid to all other Participants for
such Performance Period.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (IDENTIFY
SPECIFIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS HERE) THE ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,668
<SECURITIES>                                     3,001
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                       218
<INVENTORY>                                      5,017
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,804
<PP&E>                                          14,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,112
<BONDS>                                             67
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,799
<SALES>                                         50,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,689
<CGS>                                           25,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,021
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   341
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (692)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,462)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,462)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            67305
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     52907
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                       48809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 172617
<PP&E>                                           104476
<DEPRECIATION>                                    45207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   253440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             81033
<BONDS>                                           29050
<COMMON>                                           2016
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                       133786
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     253440
<SALES>                                          298261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 298261
<CGS>                                            203013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    203013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   33528
<INCOME-TAX>                                      11937
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               21591
<DISCONTINUED>                                    11760
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      33351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      2.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      2.07
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000

<CASH>                                         1,858,874
<SECURITIES>                                   61,453
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                   10,000
<INVENTORY>                                    951,362
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,048,867
<PP&E>                                         489,266
<DEPRECIATION>                                 314,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,235,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          160,223
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       39,379
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,035,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,235,512
<SALES>                                        264,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               264,410
<CGS>                                          96,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,487
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                39,244
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            39,244
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   39,244
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.01



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6841

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT FERDINAND ANNEHEIM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CR-99-20, CA-01-1-5)

Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 5, 2002

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Ferdinand Anneheim, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon,

Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Ferdinand Anneheim seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in

forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss

the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States

v. Anneheim, Nos. CR-99-20; CA-01-1-5 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### SUTTON v. STATE.

No. 25366.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 3, 1951.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was charged with receiving and concealing stolen property of the value in excess of $5 and less than $50 and was assessed a penalty of thirty days in jail.

The State’s Attorney, in his brief, admits doubt as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support conviction. We think it is definitely insufficient: The state relies upon the evidence of an accomplice witness and no effort was made to corroborate the same. We find in the record reference to a statement being signed by appellant but it is not included in the statement of facts and there is nothing to show its contents. Other defects in- the record need not be discussed.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


The Board of Directors
Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-76229) of Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd. of our
report dated March 24, 2003 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002
and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
(loss) income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 and the related schedule,
which report appears in the December 31, 2002 Form 10-K of Annuity and Life Re
(Holdings), Ltd.

Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule have been
prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As
discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has
suffered a significant loss from operations and experienced liquidity demands
that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's plans with regard to these matters are also described in Note 2.
The consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for derivative
financial instruments and hedging activities as of January 1, 2001.

KPMG
Hamilton, Bermuda
April 15, 2003
1

Mears, Gilbert

From: benita campbell <b_j_campbell@yahoo.com>

Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 7:45 PM

To: Mears, Gilbert

Subject: Close TRI Loophole

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

You must stand up to the fossil fuel industry and protect the public and the living ecosystems that sustain us. 

Communities' rights must take precedence over corporate rights to be greedy. Our present lives and future lives of our 

progeny depend on it. 

CLOSE THE TRI LOOPHOLE!
EXHIBIT 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Colin L. Slade, certify that:

     (1)   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tektronix,
Inc., for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2004;

     (2)   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     (3)   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     (4)   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

           (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

           (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

           (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     (5)   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

           (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

           (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Dated:  April 12, 2004

/s/ COLIN L. SLADE
-------------------------------------------------
Colin L. Slade
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Southwest Oregon Province Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC) 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southwest Oregon PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on 
October 31, 2000 in North Bend, Oregon, at the Coos Bay Bureau of Land 
Management Office at 1300 Airport Lane. The meeting will begin at 9:00 
a.m. and continue until 4:30 p.m. Agenda items to be covered include: 
(1) Province Implementation Monitoring 2000; (2) Public Comment; (3) 
Province Large Wood Implementation; (4) Rogue Basin Technical Team 
Update; (5) BLM Third-Year Monitoring Evaluation; and (6) Current 
issues as perceived by Advisory Committee members.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Roger Evenson, Province Advisory Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Forest Service, Umpqua National Forest, 2900 NW Stewart Parkway, 
Roseburg, Oregon 97470, phone (541) 957-3344.

    Dated: October 16, 2000.
Don Ostby,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 00-26975 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M