alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Subsidiaries’ or Affiliate’s Name                                                                |         | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization |         | Percentage of Ownership       |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------------|-------------------------------|
| Bodisen Holdings, Inc. (“BHI”)                                                              |         | Delaware                                      |         | 100% by Bodisen Biotech, Inc. |
| Yang Ling Bodisen Agricultural Technology Co. Ltd. (“Bodisen Agriculture”)                  |         | PRC                                           |         | 100% by Bodisen Biotech, Inc. |
| Yang Ling Bodisen Biology Science and Technology Development Company Limited (“Yang Ling”)  |         | PRC                                           |         | 100% by Bodisen Agriculture   |
| Xinjiang Bodisen Agriculture Material Co. Ltd.                                                               |    | PRC                                           |    | 100% by Yang Ling             |

----
EX-10.1





 Exhibit 10.1 

INFORMATION IN THIS EXHIBIT IDENTIFIED BY BRACKETS IS CONFIDENTIAL AND HAS BEEN EXCLUDED PURSUANT TO ITEM 601(B)(10)(IV) OF REGULATION S-K BECAUSE IT (I) IS NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO FEDEX IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED. 
  





 
  

			
	Subject:	  	Option Aircraft
		
	Reference:	  	Purchase Agreement No. 3712 (Purchase Agreement) between The Boeing Company (Boeing) and Federal Express Corporation (Customer) relating to Model 767-3S2F aircraft
(Aircraft)
		
		  	Letter Agreement FED-PA-03712-LA-1106156R5 to the Purchase Agreement
(the Option Aircraft Letter Agreement)

 Dear McKenzie: 
 Please allow
this letter to amend and restate the letter covering the same subject matter previously agreed to between Boeing and FedEx on or about May 28th, 2021. 

This letter provides you notice of our intent to exercise all ten (10) of our FY24 Aircraft Options. Furthermore, without waiving any rights under the Purchase
Agreement or the Option Aircraft Letter Agreement, this letter also provides you notice of our intent to exercise all ten (10) of our FY25 Aircraft Options. For purposes of this letter, the FY24 and FY25 Aircraft Options shall be referred to,
collectively or individually, as the “Aircraft Options” as such Aircraft Options are defined in the Option Aircraft Letter Agreement. Pursuant to the Option Aircraft Letter Agreement, [*]. 

[*]. Because of [*], we propose the following: 
  

	 	1.	 [*]. 


  

	 	2.	 [*]. 


  

	 	3.	 [*]. 


  

	 	4.	 The additional payments due Boeing as a result of SA16 would be paid within one week of execution of SA16 so as
to allow time for internal processing of the payments. 


 The sequence of events outlined above will allow both parties to remain
compliant with the terms of the Purchase Agreement and the Option Aircraft Letter Agreement and also remain consistent with past practices. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties have also agreed as part of SA16 that: [*]. The FedEx signature block
is intended to represent our agreement to the matters set forth in this letter. In order to confirm and memorialize your agreement with the matters set forth in this letter, please sign beneath the FedEx signature block. 

 

	*	 Blank spaces contained confidential information that has been excluded pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of
Regulation S-K because it (i) is not material and (ii) would likely cause competitive harm to FedEx if publicly disclosed. 














 Yours Truly, 
  

	
	 /s/ Kevin Burkhart

	Kevin Burkhart


	
	Vice President –Aircraft Acquisitions and Fleet Planning

  

			
	Agreed to by Boeing:
		
	By:	 	 /s/ McKenzie Kuckhahn

	Name:	 	McKenzie Kuckhahn
	Title:	 	Regional Director, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Contracts
	Date:	 	June 8, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2880 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2880

    To require the Secretary of Education to use the excess revenue 
generated from the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program to carry 
                  out the Federal Pell Grant Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2013

   Mr. Kind introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Secretary of Education to use the excess revenue 
generated from the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program to carry 
                  out the Federal Pell Grant Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLYING EXCESS REVENUE TO FEDERAL PELL GRANTS.

    The Secretary of Education shall--
            (1) as soon as practicable after the end of a fiscal year, 
        determine whether during such fiscal year the William D. Ford 
        Federal Direct Loan Program under part D of title IV of the 
        Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.) 
        generated any revenue in excess of the amount that was 
        necessary to cover the costs of carrying out such Program for 
        such fiscal year; and
            (2) if such excess revenue was generated, use such excess 
        revenue to carry out the Federal Pell Grant Program under 
        subpart 1 of part A of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 
        1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a) for the succeeding fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-031-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 99.7
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of OPTI Canada Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Travis Beatty, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
 
 March 15, 2010




By:
(signed) Travis BeattyTravis Beatty
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Superior Uniform Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Michael Benstock     
|Michael Benstock         
|Chief Executive Officer  
|                         
|/s/ Andrew D. Demott, Jr.
|Andrew D. Demott, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer  



Date:
November 7, 2005
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RICHARD HERNANDEZ, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-3008

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 14, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; William Fuente, 

Judge.

Rachael E. Bushey of O'Brien Hatfield, 

P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
First Amendment to the Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Compensation Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.12(a) 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 CENTENE CORPORATION NON-EMPLOYEE 
 DIRECTORS DEFERRED STOCK 
 COMPENSATION PLAN 
  
 This Plan Amendment executed this 28th day of December, 2005, by Centene Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Centene”): 
  
 WITNESSETH: 
  
 WHEREAS, Centene originally adopted the Centene Corporation Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Compensation Plan effective September 15, 2004.

  
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of Centene believes that
it is in the best interests of Centene to amend the Plan. 
  
 NOW,
THEREFORE, Centene amends the Plan effective July 1, 2005 as follows: 
  
 1. Section VI.2, Timing of Election, is deleted in its entirety and substituted in lieu thereof is the following: 
  
 VI.2 Timing of Election. Each Non-Employee Director who is serving on the Board on the Effective Date may make a Deferral Election at any
time prior to the Effective Date for Fees for services rendered and payable on or after the Effective Date. Any person who is not then serving as a Non-Employee Director may make a Deferral Election within thirty (30) days after commencing to
serve as a Non-Employee Director, effective for Fees for services performed subsequent to the date such Deferral Election is made. 
  
 In the event a Non-Employee Director does not timely make a Deferral Election pursuant to the preceding paragraph for the first year of eligibility, such
Deferral Election shall be effective for Fees paid for the calendar quarter in which such Deferral Election is made to the extent described in the subsequent sentence. The Deferral Election will apply to the portion of the Fees equal to the total
amount of Fees for such calendar quarter multiplied by the ratio of the number of days remaining in the calendar quarter over the total number of days in the calendar quarter. 
  
 A Non-Employee Director who does not make a Deferral Election during the first calendar year of eligibility may make a
Deferral Election at such time before the first day of any subsequent calendar year. Such Deferral Election shall be effective in accordance with administrative procedures established with respect to the Plan. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Centene has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer or
representative. 
  

			
	CENTENE CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David L. Steward


	 	 	David L. Steward
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert K. Ditmore


	 	 	 Robert K. Ditmore
 Chairman, Compensation
Committee



  

 - 2 -
[Cite as State ex rel. Williams v. Sieve, 130 Ohio St.3d 207, 2011-Ohio-5258.]

T HE S TATE EX REL . W ILLIAMS , A PPELLANT , v. S IEVE , J UDGE , A PPELLEE . [Cite as State ex rel. Williams v. Sieve, 130 Ohio St.3d 207, 2011-Ohio-5258.] Civil procedure—Disqualification of m agistrate—Mandamus to conduct hearing denied—Adequate remedy by appeal. (No. 2011-0959—Submitted October 5, 2011—Decided October 18, 2011.)

A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-110179.

__________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Daniel J. Williams Jr., for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division Judge Jon Sieve, to follow procedural law by hearing and considering oral arguments before ruling on Williams’s motion to disqualify a court magistrate in a divorce case. Removal of a magistrate is within the judge’s discretion, In re Disqualification of Wilson (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 1250, 674 N.E.2d 360, and mandamus will not lie to control judicial discretion, even if that discretion is
abused. State ex rel. Avery v. Union Cty. Court of Common Pleas , 125 Ohio St.3d 35, 2010-Ohio-1427, 925 N.E.2d 969, ¶ 1. Williams has an adequate remedy by appeal to raise any claims of error in the domestic-relations case. Judgment affirmed.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , C UPP , and M C G EE B ROWN , JJ., concur.

__________________ Daniel J. Williams Jr., pro se.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Pr osecuting Attorney, and Charles W. Anness, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

______________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,971
<SECURITIES>                                    10,033
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,544
<PP&E>                                           8,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,959
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,879
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,903
<SALES>                                         80,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,132
<CGS>                                           40,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   277
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (299)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,112
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,813
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,299
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,299
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1





                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, included
herein, dated January 12, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2000 and 1999 and for the years then ended in the two Registration Statements on
Form S-8 for the "Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan" and
"Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. Employees' Retirement Plan" filed by the Company
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 7, 1998 and July 10, 1998,
respectively.




                                          /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Oak Brook, Illinois
March 29, 2001
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Open Energy Corporation (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Saltman,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





/s/
      David Saltman


David
      Saltman


Chief
      Executive Officer





October
      5, 2006
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10148 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSARO DARLINGTON ASEMOTA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:93-CR-349-G

- - - - - - - - - - August 15, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Osaro Darlington Asemota appeals the district court’s refusal to grant a downward departure in his sentence on the basis of the collateral consequences of his status as a deportable alien and the imminent deportation proceedings facing him upon completion of his sentence. “Collateral consequences, such as the likelihood of deportation or ineligibility for more lenient conditions of imprisonment, that an alien may incurNo. 97-10148 - 2 - following a federal conviction are not a basis for downward departure.” United States v. Nnanna , 7 F.3d 420, 422 (5th Cir. 1993). The district court did not err in concluding that it lacked the authority to award a downward departure. Id
. AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Bruce Burgwin, Appellant.

Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Appellate Part, Second Department,

February 11, 1958.

*Frank D. O’Connor, District Attorney (Morton Greenspan*of counsel), for respondent.

*Henry Albert*for appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The record here is devoid of any proof of (1) that the defendant frequented or loitered about a public place for the purpose of committing the crime specified in subdivision 8 of section 722 of the Penal Law, or (2) that the defendant solicited anyone for any purpose whatsoever; (3) that there was an intention on the part of the defendant to provoke a breach of the peace and (4) that the defendant’s alleged acts, charged to have been committed behind closed doors of cubicles, may have occasioned or had occasioned a breach of the peace.

Accordingly, the complaint charging the defendant with disorderly conduct, pursuant to the above subdivision and section should be dismissed. *(People*v. *Humphrey,*111 N. Y. S. 2d 450; *People*v. *Strauss,*114 N. Y. S. 2d 322.)

*471The judgment of conviction should be reversed and complaint dismissed and fine remitted.

Kozicke, Kozinn and Molloy, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2699 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2699

   To extend the hold harmless provisions of the Ryan White HIV/AIDS 
        Program pending reauthorization of the overall program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 16, 2013

 Mr. Pallone introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the hold harmless provisions of the Ryan White HIV/AIDS 
        Program pending reauthorization of the overall program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RYAN WHITE HIV/AIDS PROGRAM TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.

    For any fiscal year after fiscal year 2013 for which appropriations 
are made to carry out title XXVI of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 300ff-11 et seq.) but for which the authorizations of 
appropriations to carry out such title have not been extended--
            (1) sections 2603(a)(4)(C) and 2618(a)(2)(H)(v) of such Act 
        (42 U.S.C. 300ff-13(a)(4)(C), 300ff-28(a)(2)(H)(v)) shall not 
        apply; and
            (2) sections 2603(a)(4)(A), 2610(c)(2)(B)(ii), and 
        2618(a)(2)(H)(iii) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 300ff-13(a)(4)(A), 
        300ff-20(c)(2)(B)(ii), 300ff-28(a)(2)(H)(iii)) shall apply in 
        the same manner as such respective sections apply for fiscal 
        year 2013.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26979]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering and Environmental 
Systems; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering and Environmental 
Systems (1189).
    Date and Time: November 8, 2000, 8 a.m.-5 p.m.
    National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 380, 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: A. Frederick Thompson and Nicholas L. Clesceri, 
Program Directors, Division of Bioengineering and Environmental 
Systems, National Science Foundation; 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, Virginia 22230; Telephone: (703) 292-8320.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Environmental Engineering 2001 
CAREER Proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 16, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-26979 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M