alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.A** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Stephen C. Beasley, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company;     2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this Report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this Report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this Report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 6, 2006 /s/  *Stephen    C. Beasley*    Stephen C. Beasley    President    (Principal Executive Officer)    Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000095676
<NAME>                        Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  AUG-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                                 712
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (544)
<INVENTORY>                                          8,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    21,439
<PP&E>                                              21,835
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (5,996)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      48,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               16,520
<BONDS>                                             17,393
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               299
<OTHER-SE>                                          11,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        48,611
<SALES>                                             11,755
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    40,730
<CGS>                                               (7,067)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       (7,067)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    (3,206)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (843)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        581
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (227)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    354
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           354
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.11




</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

AND EMC CORPORATION, 

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00478-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

LETTER OF REQUEST FOR FOREIGN DISCOVERY
1

Defendants Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., and EMC Corporation, (collectively 

“Defendants”) seek foreign discovery from third party witnesses residing in Canada. Defendants 

have attached Appendices with Letters of Request which include Document Requests and

Deposition Topics. Defendants respectfully request that the Court execute the Letters of Request

attached as Appendices H, J, L, and Q. Defendants further request that, after the Court has signed 

the Letters of Request, the Clerk of this Court authenticate the Court’s signature under the seal of 

this Court, and return the original signed and sealed executed Letters, and two certified copies of 

the signed and sealed executed Letters, to Defendants’ counsel, Barry K. Shelton, for delivery to 

the proper authority.

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, indicated 

that it reserves the right to serve its own foreign discovery in the future.

Dated: November 6, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Attorneys for Defendants
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 6, 2020, all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the 

Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2840 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2840

   To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to exclude raisins from 
                     agricultural marketing orders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2013

  Mr. Radel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to exclude raisins from 
                     agricultural marketing orders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF RAISINS FROM AGRICULTURAL MARKETING ORDERS.

    (a) Exclusion.--
            (1) In general.--Section 8c(2)(A) of the Agricultural 
        Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c(2)(A)), reenacted with amendments 
        by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, is amended 
        by striking ``and the products of honeybees'' and inserting 
        ``the products of honeybees, and raisins''.
            (2) Conforming amendments.--Such Act is further amended by 
        striking ``raisins,'' each place it appears in the following 
        provisions:
                    (A) Section 8c(6)(I) (7 U.S.C. 608c(6)(I)).
                    (B) Section 8e(a) (7 U.S.C. 608e-1).
    (b) Existing Orders.--Effective on the date of the enactment of 
this Act, no order issued by the Secretary pursuant to section 8c of 
the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c), as in effect prior to 
such enactment, shall have any force or effect with respect to raisins.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6638

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM C. BREWSTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 98-6964

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM C. BREWSTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan,

Senior District Judge. (CR-95-143-5, CA-97-303-4)
2

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William C. Brewster, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

William C. Brewster seeks to appeal two district court orders

dismissing his claims and denying his motion filed under 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation

of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brewster,

Nos. CR-95-143-5; CA-97-303-4 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 6, 1998; June 19,

1998). We further deny Brewster’s motion for bail pending appeal as

moot, and his motion for the preparation of transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**SEAN P. BUCKLEY**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM RETIRED STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 83 DB 2015 (No. 54 RST 2015)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 42320** 

**(Out of State)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 21 st**  **day of August, 2015, the Report and Recommendation o f**  **Disciplinary Board Member dated August 10, 2015, is app roved and it is ORDERED**  **that Sean P. Buckley, who has been on Retired Status, h as never been suspended or**  **disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and**  **learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is,**  **hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Ba r of this Commonwealth. The**  **expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall**  **be paid by the Petitioner.**
#### LEDFORD v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 21, 1952.

O. J. Cockrell, Jackson, for appellant.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

CLAY, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of knowingly receiving stolen goods, and was given a penitentiary sentence. On this appeal her only ground for reversal is that the jury which tried her was not summoned and selected according to law.

The trial was held in the Powell Circuit Court. The court had ordered the jury selected from Wolfe County, and the panel was summoned by the sheriff of that county. When the case was called for trial and this fact appeared, the court discharged the panel. The sheriff of Powell County was then directed to summon another panel from Wolfe County. He thereupon summoned the same jurors who had just been discharged.

Section 194 of the Criminal Code of Practice provides that where it appears impractical to obtain an unbiased jury in the county where a prosecution is pending, the court is authorized to order the sheriff of that county to summon jurors from adjoining counties. In Neal v. Commonwealth, 233 Ky. 533, 26 S.W.2d 23, we held that the jury must be summoned by an officer of the court trying the case, and that a sheriff of another county, unless duly sworn for the purpose, cannot summon the jury. This was the reason the first panel was discharged.

Thereafter section 194 was complied with. The sheriff of Powell County actually summoned the Wolfe County jurors. The fact that they were not in Wolfe County at the time is immaterial. See Benson v. Commonwealth, 249 Ky. 328, 60 S.W.2d 941. We find nothing illegal in the method of selecting this panel.

The judgment is affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-50286

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES EDWARD MURPHY,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-99-CR-92-1

--------------------

April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Counsel appointed to represent Charles Edward Murphy has

moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Murphy has received a copy of

counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2871 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2871

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to modify the composition of the 
     southern judicial district of Mississippi to improve judicial 
                   efficiency, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REALIGNMENT OF SOUTHERN JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI.
    Section 104(b) of title 28, United States Code, is amended to read 
as follows:

                          ``Southern District

    ``(b) The southern district comprises four divisions.
        ``(1) The Northern Division comprises the counties of Copiah, 
    Hinds, Holmes, Issaquena, Kemper, Lauderdale, Leake, Madison, 
    Neshoba, Newton, Noxubee, Rankin, Scott, Simpson, Sharkey, Smith, 
    Warren, and Yazoo.
Court for the Northern Division shall be held at Jackson.
        ``(2) The Southern Division comprises the counties of George, 
    Greene, Hancock, Harrison, Jackson, Pearl River, and Stone.
Court for the Southern Division shall be held at Gulfport.
        ``(3) The Eastern Division comprises the counties of Clarke, 
    Covington, Forrest, Jasper, Jefferson Davis, Jones, Lamar, 
    Lawrence, Marion, Perry, Wayne, and Walthall.
Court for the Eastern Division shall be held at Hattiesburg.
        ``(4) The Western Division comprises the counties of Adams, 
    Amite, Claiborne, Franklin, Jefferson, Lincoln, Pike, and 
    Wilkinson.
Court for the Western Division shall be held at Natchez.''.
SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.
    This Act and the amendment made by this Act shall take effect on 
the date of the enactment of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,362,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,530,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,247
<INVENTORY>                                  1,139,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,120,991
<PP&E>                                         551,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,672,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,599,368
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,695,236
<COMMON>                                     3,703,195
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,672,166
<SALES>                                      2,703,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,703,644
<CGS>                                        1,118,306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,118,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,952,440
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,490
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,259,388
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,259,388
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,259,388
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16


</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER THOMAS HUGHES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1074

[March 22, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; James W. McCann, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

562015CF002567AXXXXX.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David John McPherrin, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. 

Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32 Section 1350
Certifications.

---

# Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Tidelands Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The annual report of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  March 20, 2006 |  | By:   /s/  Robert E. Coffee, Jr.
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|                      |  | Robert E. Coffee, Jr.           
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer         

|Date:  March 20, 2006 |  | By:   /s/  Alan W. Jackson
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------
|                      |  | Alan W. Jackson           
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Joint Application of 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC., 

 ALITALIA - COMPAGNIA AEREA ITALIANA 

 S.p.A., et al.

for statements of authorization pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. 212 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

) 

Docket DOT-OST-2001-10417 

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARING

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to: 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director – Government Affairs 

 & Associate General Counsel 

Jeff Morgan 

Regional Director – Government Affairs 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 

1212 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Tel: (202) 842-4184 

Email: sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

Richard D. Mathias 

David M. Endersbee 

Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, L.L.P. 

888 Seventeenth Street, NW, Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20006 

Tel: (202) 973-7917 

Fax: (202) 342-0683 

Email: rdmathias@zsrlaw.com 

 dmendersbee@zsrlaw.com 

Counsel for Alitalia - Compagnia Aerea 

Italiana S.p.A. 

March 16, 2012
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Joint Application of 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC., 

 ALITALIA - COMPAGNIA AEREA ITALIANA 

 S.p.A., et al.

for statements of authorization pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. 212 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

) 

Docket DOT-OST-2001-10417 

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARING

Pursuant to the blanket statements of authorization granted to Delta Air Lines, 

Inc. (“Delta”), Alitalia - Compagnia Aerea Italiana S.p.A. (“Alitalia”), and their respective 

affiliates, the carriers hereby notify the Department that, on or after 30 days from today, 

Alitalia’s “AZ” designator code will be displayed on flights operated by Delta between 

Alitalia’s authorized gateways in the United States and Santo Domingo, Dominican 

Republic (SDQ). 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director, Government Affairs & 

Associate General Counsel 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 

/s/ Richard D. Mathias 

_____________________ 

Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, L.L.P. 

Counsel for Alitalia - Compagnia Aerea 

Italiana S.p.A.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 A copy of the foregoing Notice has been served this 16th day of March, 2012, upon 

the following persons via email: 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

dan.weiss@united.com 

oracio.marquez@united.com 

jonathan.linde@united.com 

howard.kass@usairways.com 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com 

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov 

info@airlineinfo.com