alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered April 2 2 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01115

- CV

MIDWEST COMPRESSOR S YSTEMS LLC D/B/A LRS , Appellant

V.

HIGHLAND IMPERIAL, I NC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 002

- 02584

- 2017

ORDER

Befor e the Court is appellee’s April 21, 2020 unopposed second motion to

extend time to file its brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellee’s brief

be filed no later than May 22, 2020.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000096988
<NAME> MARLTON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<CURRENCY> DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                       1,767,180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,583,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                   404,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,654,642
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,010,886
<PP&E>                                       7,410,498
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,077,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,145,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,841,563
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    30,687,447
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,826,977)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,145,388
<SALES>                                     68,725,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            68,725,833
<CGS>                                       52,714,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,714,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (752,062)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,272,196
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,306,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,966,196
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,966,196
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5562 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5562

   To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on certain sports footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on certain sports footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SPORTS FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Sports footwear     Free            47 cents/pr.   No change      On or before     ''.
                          with outer soles                    + 10.5%                       12/31/2015
                          and uppers of
                          rubber or
                          plastics, valued
                          over $6.50 but
                          not over $12/
                          pair, the
                          foregoing not for
                          men (provided for
                          in subheading
                          6402.19.70)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### HARDIN v. STATE.

No. 25817.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 7, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The appellant in this case was indicted for robbery by assault.

The defense of insanity was interposed. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury returned the following verdict:

> “We, the jury, find the defendant to have been sane at «the time the act is alleged to have .been committed but insane at the time of this trial.”

The judgment of the court recited the above verdict and ordered “that all further proceedings herein against him be and are suspended until he becomes sane”, rémand-ed the accused to the custody of the sheriff and certified the proceedings to the county judge for his information and action in accordance with Article 932a, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P.

The State contends that this Court is without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.

The accused has not here been found guilty of anything, and no punishment has been assessed; therefore, this is "not a “criminal case” within the meaning of Article 5, Section 5 of the Constitution, Vernon’s Ann.St., which defines the jurisdiction of this Court. Griffin v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 306, 29 S.W.2d 349.

The appeal is dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 191 (Monday, October 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 61134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25453]

[[Page 61134]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7623]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Ethiopia

    Pursuant to Section 7086(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. 
L. 111-117) as carried forward by the Full-Year Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2011 (Div. B, Pub. L. 112-10) (``the Act''), and 
Department of State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby 
determine that it is important to the national interest of the United 
States to waive the requirements of Section 7086(c)(1) of the Act with 
respect to Ethiopia and I hereby waive such restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 11, 2011.
Thomas Nides,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011-25453 Filed 9-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
```
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT
      TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002




In
      connection with theQuarterlyReport
      of The Steak n Shake Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Qfor
      the period ended
      April 8,
      2009as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), each of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






/s/Sardar
      Biglari


Sardar
      Biglari, Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President


May
      18, 2009




/s/
      Duane E. Geiger


Duane
      E. Geiger,Interim Chief
      Financial Officer, Vice President and Controller


May
      18, 2009
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of National Equipment Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Gullion, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



/s/
JOSEPH M. GULLION

Joseph M.
Gullion
Chief Executive Officer
April 15, 2003

---

QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51303

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS VERGARA-TORRES

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-1271

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Vergara-Torres

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 2, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51303

2

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-506-002]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 13, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 6, 2000, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest) submitted supplemental information in support of its 
partial capacity turnback proposal in this proceeding.
    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's Order, dated September 22, 2000, which directed 
Northwest to file such supplemental information.
    Northwest states that it has served a copy of this compliance 
filing upon each person designated on the official service list 
compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before October 
20, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the 
Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online.rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26833 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5888-5889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2610]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Boston Harbor Islands Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (PL 92-463) that the Boston Harbor Islands Advisory 
Council will meet on Thursday, March 2, 2000. The meeting will convene 
at 6:00 PM at the University Club, University of Massachusetts, 100 
Morrissey Boulevard, Healey Library, 11th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts.
    The Advisory Council was appointed by the Director of National Park 
Service pursuant to Public Law 104-333. The 28 members represent 
business, educational, cultural, and environmental entities; 
municipalities surrounding Boston Harbor; and Native American 
interests. The purpose of the Council is to advise and make 
recommendations to the Boston Harbor Islands Partnership with respect 
to the development and implementation of a management plan and the 
operation of the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area.
    The Agenda for this meeting is as follows:
    1. Approval of minutes from February 10, 2000
    2. Present and review annual report

[[Page 5889]]

    3. Nomination for Advisory Council seats.
    4. Election of officers
    5. Discussion on the draft General Management Plan
    The meeting is open to the public. Further information concerning 
Council meetings may be obtained from the Superintendent, Boston Harbor 
Islands. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Council or file written statements. Such requests should be made at 
least seven days prior to the meeting to: Superintendent, Boston Harbor 
Islands NRA, 408 Atlantic Ave., Boston, MA, 02110, telephone (617) 223-
8667.

    Dated: January 24, 2000.
George E. Price, Jr.,
Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA.
[FR Doc. 00-2610 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1711

DONALD VAN METER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; WILLIAM WETOZINS; V. KATHERINE VAN METER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-364-A) Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 29, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Van Meter, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Paul Cooley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Fairfax, Virginia; Lisette Pedre Mestre, LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donald Van Meter appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Van Meter v. Commonwealth of VA , No. CA01-364-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 23.2**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (FileNos. 333-47246, 333-62356 and 333-114341) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-62630, 333-98243 and333-110167) of Horizon Offshore, Inc. of our report datedMarch 12, 2004 relating to theconsolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003 and therelated consolidated statments of operations, stockholders’equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2003 and2002 of Horizon Offshore, Inc. which appears in this form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Houston, Texas
-----~--------------------------

KAREN LONG, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RICHARD SARLES, 

Defendant. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

FEB 11 2011 

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of Columbia 

11 0395 

The Clerk of Court received 51 pro se complaints from plaintiff, each accompanied by an 

application to proceed in forma pauperis, on December 29,2010. The Court consolidates these 

52 filings for purposes of this Memorandum Opinion. 

The court must dismiss a complaint if it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim 

upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.c. § 1915( e )(2)(B)(i). In Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 

319 (1989), the Supreme Court states that the trial court has the authority to dismiss not only 

claims based on an indisputably meritless legal theory, but also claims whose factual contentions 

are clearly baseless. Claims describing fantastic or delusional scenarios fall into the category of 

cases whose factual contentions are clearly baseless. !d. at 328. The trial court has the discretion 

to decide whether a complaint is frivolous, and such finding is appropriate when the facts alleged 

are irrational or wholly incredible. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992). 
The court is mindful that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent 

standards than those applied to forn1al pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 

u.s. 519, 520 (1972). The Court has reviewed plaintiffs complaints and finds each to be 

incomprehensible. Some contain nothing more than disjointed phrases; others demand millions 

of dollars in damages for claims that the Court cannot discern. Accordingly, the Court deems the 

complaint frivolous and will dismiss this action under 28 U.S.c. § 1915(a)(2)(B)(i). 

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. 

DATE:U. ~ ADjl 

United States District Judg 

2
Exhibit 99.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, CIT Capital Trust I Securities-Backed Series 2002-15 Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
          servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report of the Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
          provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
          under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion
          in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
          based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
          Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.



Date:  March 26, 2004


         /s/ David J. Kolibachuk
------------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President



                                      8
Exhibit 4.1 -



Exhibit 4.1


MONTEGU RESOURCES CORP.

INCORPORATION UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

AUTHORIZED SHARES $0.00001 PAR VALUE


	
NUMBER 
	
SHARES

	 	
CUSIP 

	 	
See Reverse

	 	
For Certain Definitions





THIS CERTIFIES THAT


Is The Owner of


FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF $0.00001 PAR VALUE COMMON STOCK OF


MONTEGU RESOURCES CORP.


Transferable only on the books of the Company in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.  This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Company has caused this Certificate to be executed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the facsimile seal of the Company.


	
Dated:

	 
	
_______________________
	 	
_________________________

	
Secretary
	
SEAL
	
President



 

 

 

 





 

MONTEGU RESOURCES CORP.


TRANSFER FEE: $20.00 PER NEW CERTIFICATE ISSUED


The following abbreviations when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable law or regulations:


TEN COM - as tenants in common

TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties

JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common

UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - __________ Custodian ___________ (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act ____________ (State)


Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.


For Value Received, _________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto _______________ (Please insert Social Security or other identifying number of Assignee). 

_________________________________________________________________

(Please print or typewrite name and address, including zip code of Assignee)

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________ Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint _______________________ attorney-in-fact to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises.


Dated: _________________


 


 _____________________________________________

Notice: The signatures to this Assignment must correspond with the name(s) as written upon the face of the certificate in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever.








Signature(s) Guaranteed:


___________________________

The signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions with membership in an approved signature guarantee Medallion Program), pursuant to S.E.C. Rule 17Ad-15.


 

 

 

 

 - 2 -