alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Approved Tribal-State Compact. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish, in the                         **Federal Register**                        , notice of approved Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved the Tribal-State Compact between the State of California and the Pauma Band of Mission Indians, which was executed on May 1, 2000.                     

# DATES:

This action is effective October 19, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC, 20240 (202) 219-4066. 

Dated: October 6, 2000. 

Kevin Gover, 

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 00-26881 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
**TKP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 0 - 0 302 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRANDON JAMES LEWIS TOLLIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 -day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including Novem

ber 12 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response .

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court October 8 2021

10/08/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0302
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40815

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALEJANDRO SOLIS-TENEYUCA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:14-CR-314-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Alejandro Solis-Teneyuca has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Solis-Teneyuca has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as SolisTeneyuca’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 8, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40815 Document: 00513410571 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/08/2016
No. 15-40815

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-40815 Document: 00513410571 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/08/2016
# AGENCY:

 Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

 Notice of comment period extension and additional public hearing.

# SUMMARY:

 On August 13, 1999, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Notice of Availability (64 FR 44200) of its Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada (DOE/EIS-0250-D) and announced a 180-day public comment period ending February 9, 2000. Based on input from the public, DOE is now announcing an additional public hearing in San Bernardino, California. The comment period is being extended to February 28, 2000.

# DATES:

 The additional public hearing will be held on February 22, 2000, from 11:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m. and from 6:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m. The comment period for the Draft EIS is extended to February 28, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

 The additional public hearing will be held at the following location: Radisson Hotel, 295 North E. Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401.

                        Written comments on the Draft EIS should be directed to: Ms. Wendy R. Dixon, EIS Program Manager, M/S 010, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office, P.O. Box 30307, North Las Vegas, NV 89036-0307. Comments may also be transmitted by facsimile to 1-800-967-0739 and should include the following identifier: “Yucca Mountain Draft EIS.” Comments may be submitted over the Internet via the Yucca Mountain Project website at                         *http://www.ymp.gov*, under the listing “Environmental Impact Statement.”                    

# INVITATION TO COMMENT: 

The public is invited to provide comments on the Draft EIS during the comment period that ends on February 28, 2000. DOE will consider comments received during the comment period in preparation of the Final EIS. Comments received after February 28, 2000 will be considered to the extent practicable.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Ms. Wendy R. Dixon, EIS Program Manager, M/S 010, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office, P.O. Box 30307, North Las Vegas, NV 89036-0307, Telephone 1-800-967-3477, Facsimile 1-800-967-0739. Copies of the document may also be requested by telephone (1-800-967-3477) or over the Internet via the Yucca Mountain Project website at                         *http://www.ymp.gov*, under the listing “Environmental Impact Statement”; the Draft EIS also may be viewed on this website.                    

Issued in Washington, DC, February 2, 2000.

Ivan Itkin,

Director, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management.

[FR Doc. 00-2714 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 15

October 22, 2001

Board of Directors
Superior Uniform Group, Inc.
Seminole, Florida

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. and subsidiary for the periods
ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, as indicated in our report dated October 22,
2001; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 2-85796 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP

Certified Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TenFold Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nancy M. Harvey, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Nancy M. Harvey                                                                              
|Nancy M. Harvey President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer February 28, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2974 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2974

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the eligibility 
   for beneficiary travel for veterans seeking treatment or care for 
    military sexual trauma in specialized outpatient or residential 
 programs at facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2013

  Mrs. Walorski (for herself and Ms. Kuster) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the eligibility 
   for beneficiary travel for veterans seeking treatment or care for 
    military sexual trauma in specialized outpatient or residential 
 programs at facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENEFICIARY TRAVEL FOR VETERANS SEEKING TREATMENT OR CARE 
              FOR MILITARY SEXUAL TRAUMA IN SPECIALIZED OUTPATIENT OR 
              RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS.

    (a) Eligibility.--Section 111 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1), by adding at the end the 
        following subparagraph:
            ``(G) A veteran whose travel to a specialized outpatient or 
        residential program at a Department facility is in connection 
        with treatment or care for military sexual trauma.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) In this section:
            ``(1) The term `military sexual trauma' means psychological 
        trauma, which in the judgment of a Department mental health 
        professional, resulted from a physical assault of a sexual 
        nature, battery of a sexual nature, or sexual harassment which 
        occurred while the veteran was serving on active duty or active 
        duty for training.
            ``(2) The term `sexual harassment' means repeated, 
        unsolicited verbal or physical contact of a sexual nature which 
        is threatening in character.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to travel occurring after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1 ONE BLOOD, INC./FCCI

INSURANCE GROUP

,

Appellant s

,

v.

ONE BLOOD, INC./ZENITH

INSURANCE COMPANY

Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4063

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 19, 2017.

An appeal from an order of Judge of Compensation Claims

. Wilbur W. Anderson, Judge.

Date of Accident: March 13, 2012

.

Thomas G. Portuallo of Eraclides, Gelman, Hall, Indek, Goodman, Waters &

Traverso, Jacksonville , for Appellant s

.

William H. Rogner, Winter Park , for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR, JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### ATHEY v. STATE.

No. 24064.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 2, 1948.

No attorney for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is an aggravated assault. The punishment assessed is a fine of $250.-00 and confinement in the county jail for a period of one month.

The record is before us without any bills of exception or a statement of facts. The *751complaint and information seem to be in due form. Consequently, there is nothing presented for review;

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 10.5



Sequa Corporation



200 Park Avenue

New York,  NY  10166

212-956-5500







May 10, 2006







Mr. John J. Dowling III

8557 Colonial Lane

Ladue,   MO   63124



Re:

Employment Agreement Extension



Dear John:



Reference is hereby made to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of May 31, 2005 by and between Sequa Corporation and you (the Employment Agreement).  Terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement.



This letter shall confirm that the Employment Term as set forth in Section 3 of the Employment Agreement shall be extended for an additional two (2) years from and after May 31, 2006 through May 31, 2008.



All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified by Executive and Company.



If the foregoing confirms your agreement and understanding, please so indicate by signing in the space provided below and returning one (1) original of this letter to me.







Very truly yours,



Sequa Corporation



/s/ Martin Weinstein

Martin Weinstein

Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



Acknowledged and Agreed

this 12th day of May, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ John J. Dowling III

John J. Dowling III
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting of the Invasive Species Advisory Committee. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given of meeting of the Invasive Species Advisory Committee. The purpose of the Advisory Committee is to provide advice to the Council, as authorized by Executive Order 13112, on a broad array of issues related to preventing the introduction of invasive species and providing for their control and minimizing the economic, ecological, and human health impacts that invasive species cause. The meeting on October 24 will be a joint meeting of the Advisory Committee and various Federal Agency Officials. The meeting on October 25 will consist of the Advisory Committee only. Both meetings will be open to the public. Attendance will be limited to space available. 

# DATES:

Meeting of Invasive Species Advisory Committee and Federal Agencies: 8:00 a.m.-4:15 p.m., Tuesday October 24, 2000; Meeting of Advisory Committee only: 8:30 a.m.-3:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 25, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Conservation Training Center, Shepherdstown, WV. The October 24th meeting will be held in the Auditorium. The October 25th meeting will be held in the Instructional West Building, Room 170. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kelsey Passé, National Invasive Species Council Program Analyst; E-mail:  kelsey_passe@ios.doi.gov; Phone: (202) 208-6336; Fax: (202) 208-1526. 

      ( print page 62366)    
Dated: October 16, 2000. 

Lori Williams, 

Executive Director, National Invasive Species Council. 

[FR Doc. 00-26927 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 24, 2022

No. 04-22-00312-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.R.P., a Child

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-PA-00799

Honorable Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice 

Beth Watkins, Justice 

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On October 17, 2022, appellant filed a petition for review in the Texas Supreme Court. 

Later that same day, appellant filed a motion for rehearing in this court. “A party may not file 

a motion for rehearing or en banc consideration in the court of appeals after that party has 

filed a petition for review in the Supreme Court unless the court of appeals modifies its 

opinion or judgment after the petition for review is filed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 49.11. Accordingly, 

appellant’s motion for rehearing is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.3.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of October, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of National Equipment Services, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February
18, 1999, except as to Note 14, which is as of March 31, 1999, on our audits
of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of
National Equipment Services, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for
the two years in the period ended December 31, 1998 and the period June 4,
1996 (inception) to December 31, 1996, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Chicago, IL
March 31, 1999
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Dennis OBrien, director and Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer of Superior Silver Mines, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 13, 2010



By    /s/ Dennis OBrien



Dennis OBrien, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer
**EXHIBIT 15**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED**

**PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Securities and Exchange Commission 

Washington, D.C. 20549 

We have conducted a review of the condensed consolidated financial statements of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. and subsidiary (“the Company”) as ofMarch 31, 2007 and for the three-month period ended March 31, 2007 in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and issued our report thereon dated May 7, 2007 (which reportcontains an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes*). We are aware that such financialstatements and our above-mentioned report appearing in the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 are being incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-105906, effectiveJune 6, 2003) and that such report pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 is not considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within themeaning of Paragraphs 7 and 11 of that Act. 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Tampa, Florida 

May 7, 2007
<PAGE>
 
                                   Exhibit 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
Registrant
----------

SouthBanc Shares, Inc.
 
                                            Percentage         Jurisdiction or
Subsidiaries (a)                           of Ownership     State of Incorporation
----------------------------------------  ---------------   ----------------------
<S>                                       <C>               <C>  
Perpetual Bank, A Federal Savings Bank                100%          United States
                                                                
United Service Corporation of                                   
 Anderson, Inc.(b)                                    100%         South Carolina
                                                                
United Investments Services, Inc.(c)                  100%         South Carolina
 
Mortgage First Service Corporation(b)                 100%         South Carolina
 
-------------------------
</TABLE>
(a)  The operations of the wholly owned subsidiaries of the Registrant are
     included in the Registrant's Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
     the Annual Report attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
(b)  Wholly-owned by the Savings Bank.
(c)  Wholly-owned by United Service Corporation of Anderson, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

May 25, 2001

Before

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

No. 00-3895 v.

LITTO PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United

States District Court

for the Northern

District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 00 CR 301

Milton I. Shadur,

Judge.

Order

The opinion of this court dated April 16, 2001 is amended as

follows: Page 2, first full paragraph, line 4, the cite should be

“65 Fed. Reg. 66,792 (Nov. 7, 2000).”