alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GOBER v. STATE.

No. 22889.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 14, 1944.

Tom M. Miller, of Graham, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for possessing whisky for ■¡the purpose of sale in Throckmorton Coun:ty which is alleged to be a dry area.

Appellant urges that the State failed to prove that the order of the Commissioners’ Court declaring the result of the local option election in said county was in favor of prohibition had been published as required by the statute in force when the election was held.

We find in the record the order of the Commissioners’ Court ordering a local option election, and the order declaring the result to have been in favor of prohibition, but there is an entire absence of proof that the result of said election was published. Local option did not become effective until such publication was made. The reasons for such holding are apparent from the cases of Chenowith v. State, 50 Tex.Cr.R. 238, 96 S.W. 19; Watson v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 632, 122 S.W.2d 311; Brooks v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 526, 137 S.W.2d 768. It is not necessary to elaborate on the question again. See Sweeten v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 445, 120 S.W.2d 1074 and cases therein cited.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
**Exhibit 32.A****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ending June 30, 2005, of Tennessee Gas PipelineCompany (the “Company”) as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Stephen C. Beasley, President,certify (i) that the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ Stephen C. Beasley           Stephen C. Beasley *Chairman of the Board and President* *(Principal Executive Officer)*August 5, 2005A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Tennessee Gas PipelineCompany and will be retained by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          May-27-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Nov-27-1999
<CASH>                                          57,860
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  128,637 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    120,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               742,802 <F2>
<PP&E>                                         525,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                 271,479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,191,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          349,743
<BONDS>                                        150,596
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       142,608
<OTHER-SE>                                     478,983 <F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,191,294
<SALES>                                        542,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               542,018
<CGS>                                          297,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  297,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               240,721
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,054)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (78)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,976)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   8,680
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,704
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14 <F4>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14 <F4>
<FN>
<F1> Amount represents net accounts receivable.
<F2> Amount includes net assets of discontinued operations of $341,799.
<F3> Amount includes retained earnings and other comprehensive income.
<F4> Amounts include earnings per common share from discontinued operations of
     $0.18.
</FN>


</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2899 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the quarterly 

wages paid threshold for classification as an agricultural labor employer 

for purposes of unemployment taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2013 

Mr. WELCH (for himself and Mr. HANNA) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the quarterly wages paid threshold for classification as 

an agricultural labor employer for purposes of unemployment taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Growing Small Farms 

5 Act of 2013’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2899 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN QUARTERLY WAGES PAID THRESHOLD 

2 FOR CLASSIFICATION AS AGRICULTURAL 

3 LABOR EMPLOYER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

5 3306(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘$20,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$40,000’’. 

7 (b) EMPLOYMENT.—Clause (i) of section 

8 3306(c)(1)(A) of such Code is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘$20,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$40,000’’. 

10 (c) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Paragraph (2) of sec11 tion 3306(a) of such Code, as amended by subsection (a), 

12 is amended— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘In the case of agricultural 

14 labor’’ and inserting ‘‘(A) In the case of agricultural 

15 labor’’, 

16 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and 

17 (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively, and moving 

18 such clauses 2 ems to the right, and 

19 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub20 paragraph: 

21 ‘‘(B) In the case of any year beginning after 

22 2014, the dollar amounts contained in subparagraph 

23 (A) and subsection (c)(1)(A)(i) shall each be in24 creased by an amount equal to— 

25 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2899 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment deter2 mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar 

3 year in which the taxable year begins, deter4 mined by substituting ‘calendar year 2013’ for 

5 ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) 

6 thereof. Any increase determined under the pre7 ceding sentence shall be rounded to the nearest 

8 multiple of $100.’’. 

9 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to remuneration 

11 paid after December 31, 2013, for services performed 

12 after such date. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### SUTTON v. STATE.

No. 23763.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 4, 1947.

*674No appearance for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Criminal Dist Atty., and E. T. Branch, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., both of Houston, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, *Judge.*

Appellant was sentenced to the penitentiary for the term of 10 years upon a conviction for murder.

The State has filed a motion to strike the statement of facts from this record. It appears that the same was filed on the 94th day after the motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given. Upon this showing the state’s motion to strike the statement of facts is granted, and same will not be considered.

The record before us contains no bills of exception. The procedure is in every way regular. No brief has been filed calling our attention to any error and we have found none.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 135298 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. GWAN JUN KIM, Stephen J. Markman,
Justices Claimant-Appellant,

v SC: 135298 COA: 277254 Montcalm CC: 06-008269-AE DEPARTMENT OF LA BOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH, Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 21, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

d0211 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 19, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit 32.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**In connection with the quarterly report of Tecumseh Products Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, James S. Nicholson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to my knowledge: (3) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (4) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated:      November 5, 2009 BY: /s/ James S. Nicholson    James S. Nicholson    Vice President, Treasurer andChief Financial Officer
|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                
|Alabama Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                
|Alabama Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 10     | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 1      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 20     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 99.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

I, James M. Papada, III, Chief Executive Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 28,
      2003 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2)   information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Technitrol, Inc.

Dated: May 1, 2003


                                                   /s/ James M. Papada, III
                                                   ------------------------
                                                   James M. Papada, III

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be retained by Technitrol, Inc., and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

AND EMC CORPORATION, 

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00475-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

LETTER OF REQUEST FOR FOREIGN DISCOVERY
1

Defendants Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., and EMC Corporation, (collectively 

“Defendants”) seek foreign discovery from third party witnesses residing in the Netherlands.

Defendants have attached an Appendix with a Letter of Request which includes Document 

Requests and Deposition Topics. Defendants respectfully request that the Court execute the Letter 

of Request attached as Appendix C. Defendants further request that, after the Court has signed the 

Letter of Request, the Clerk of this Court authenticate the Court’s signature under the seal of this 

Court, and return the original signed and sealed executed Letter, and two certified copies of the 

signed and sealed executed Letters, to Defendants’ counsel, Barry K. Shelton, for delivery to the 

proper authority.

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, indicated 

that it reserves the right to serve its own foreign discovery in the future.

Dated: November 6, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Attorneys for Defendants
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 6, 2020, all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the 

Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

FutureNet Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62066

)

Under Contract No. W912P6

- 12

- C

- 0024 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Kevin M. Cox, Esq.

Camardo Law Firm, P.C.

Auburn, NY

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Kevin J. Jerbi, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: September 9, 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62066

, Appeal of FutureNet Group,

Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: September 9, 2021 J. REID PROUTY

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT V 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00505-ADA Document 27-22 Filed 11/05/20 Page 1 of 2
Cases Filters HIDE

Judges

Case Status

EDIT FILTERS

Related Filters

Judges

Courts

Patents

Patent Types

Determinations

Remedies

Case Filing Date

Case Termination Date

Case Outcome

Document Filing Date

William H. Alsup

Active

Open filter drawer by default

PRINT Cases 13 Results

Google LLC v. Sonos, Inc.

3-20-cv-06754 (NDCA)

Sep. 28, 2020

Uniloc 2017 LLC et al v. Google LLC

4-20-cv-05333 (NDCA)

Aug. 03, 2020

Acorn Bay v. CamelBak Products, LLC et al

3-20-cv-05214 (NDCA)

Jul. 29, 2020

California Beach Co., LLC v. Exqline, Inc. et al

3-20-cv-01994 (NDCA)

Mar. 20, 2020

Fluidigm Corporation et al v. Ionpath, Inc.

3-19-cv-05639 (NDCA)

Sep. 06, 2019

Illumina, Inc. et al v. BGI Genomics Co., Ltd et al

3-19-cv-03770 (NDCA)

Jun. 27, 2019

Uniloc USA Inc et al v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al

3-18-cv-02913 (NDCA)

May. 17, 2018

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.

3-18-cv-00572 (NDCA)

Jan. 26, 2018

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.

3-18-cv-00360 (NDCA)

Jan. 17, 2018

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.

3-18-cv-00365 (NDCA)

Jan. 17, 2018

Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Network, Inc.

3-17-cv-05659 (NDCA)

Sep. 29, 2017

Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

3-17-cv-00939 (NDCA)

Feb. 23, 2017

Porto Technology Co., LTD v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al

4-16-cv-01429 (NDCA)

Mar. 23, 2016

FILTERS OPTIONS VIEW

Case Case Filing Date

Binder Information

Add New Tab

Table of Contents

Summary

Time to Milestones

Cases

Cases by Year

Timeline

Orders

Motion Pendency

Determinations

Claim Constructions

Remedies

Motion Success for Preliminary

Injunction

Motion Success for Stay Pending

IPR

Motion Success for Early

Challenges

Motion Success for Personal

Jurisdiction

Motion Success for MSJ by

Patentee

Motion Success for MSJ by

Challenger

© 2008 - 2020 Hopkins Bruce Publishers Terms of Use Report an Issue

FILE Judge William H. Alsup Case 6:20-cv-00505-ADA Document 27-22 Filed 11/05/20 Page 2 of 2
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-11-0487 SAT Date: 7/19/2011 Print Date: 5/1/2013
Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:
Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1 Health: PMN ; Eco: 2 3 Health: Incin Pdt ; Eco: high ocncern for toxicity of incomplete incinerati o p roducts to terrestrial organisms Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 1 1 PMN 3 3 2 Deg. Pdt.

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; PMN slow; Deg. Pdt. rapid

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: N o Commen t Keywords : Keywords: IRR-E,S,L,MM LUNG UNCERT MUTA

LIVER BLOOD MALE REPROIMMUNO ONCO AQUATOX -A,C Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: P-11-0487

S = Disp. VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 0 Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = PMN strong; Deg. Pdt low PBT Potential: PMN P3B1; Deg. Pdt. P3B3 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN slow; Deg. Pdt. rapid
Health : Health Summary: Absorption of the low molecular weight fraction is poor all routes, based on physical/chemical properties. There are concerns for irritation to all exposed tissues and for adverse effects on the lung, based on surfactant p roperties of the PMN substance and information in the PMN MSDS. There also is uncertain concern for mutagenicity, based on compounds. For the potential incineration product, based on test data for the analog concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and male reproductive toxicity [rat 28-day oral N OAEL = 50 mg/kg, LOAEL = 150 mg/kg with liver toxicity; rat 90-day oral LOAEL = 10 mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all doses and liver toxicity and anemia at 200 mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 males in the 90-day oral study that were judged by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential for male reproductive toxicity. There is also concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity based on data for
Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 >100 daphnid 48-h LC50 >100 green algal 96-h EC50 >100 fish

_ chronic value >10 daphnid

_ chronic >10value algal

_ chronic value >10 Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _
Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR chemical class = p olyme r -nonionic- effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations ; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1000
SARs nonionic polyemrs SAR Class p olyme r -nonionicEcotox Category Ecotox Factors Comments: SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Pollex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Seong Sam Cho, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 13, 2010
/s/ Seong Sam ChoBy: Seong Sam ChoIts: Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pollex, Inc. and will be retained by Pollex, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.