alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Noranda Aluminum, Inc.

Testing Performed During 

Primary Particulate, Fluoride and POM Results

2010

Phase Run Nbr Date

or 

Scrubber

Sampled

POM 

Emission 

(lbs/ton 

Green 

Anode)

POM 

Emission 

(lbs/hr)

Total 

Particulate 

Conc.

(grains per 

SCF)

Total 

Particulate 

Emission 

(lbs/hr)

Total

POM 

Conc. 

(grains per 

SCF)

Green 

Anode 

Material 

Used 

(tons/hr)

Fluoride 

Emission 

(lbs/hr)

Total 

Fluoride 

Emission 

(lbs/ton)

Total

Fluoride

Conc. 

(grains per 

SCF)

Location Method

Avg. 

Aluminum 

Production 

Rate

(tons/hr)

161 3 1 November 5 & 13 0.0006 0.000124 0.224 6.18 1.00 0.036

162 3 1 June 5 & 13 0.0010 0.000159 0.302 5.93 1.91 0.051

CARBON BAKE 1 5 & 13 0.0208 0.000530 0.179 0.000927 0.355 19.99 7.72 0.009 0.018

Potroom 1 1 1 March 5 & 13 0.0007 0.000131 0.436 10.12 2.43 0.043

Potroom 2 2 1 December 5 & 13 0.0008 0.000249 0.856 10.30 2.81 0.083

Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26912]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6887-3]


Gulf of Mexico Program Policy Review Board; Notice of Charter 
Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Charter for the Environmental Protection Agency's Gulf of 
Mexico Program Policy Review Board (GMPPRB) will be renewed for an 
additional two-year period, as a necessary committee which is in the 
public interest, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App section 9(c). The purpose 
of GMPPRB is to provide advice and recommendations to the Administrator 
of EPA on issues associated with environmental management and policy of 
the Gulf of Mexico.
    It is determined that GMPPRB is in the public interest in 
connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Agency by law.
    Inquiries may be directed to Gloria Car, U.S. EPA, Building 1103, 
Room 202, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529.

    Dated: October 10, 2000.
Gloria D. Car,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-26912 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2783 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for continued 

eligibility for the health care tax credit for PBGC pension recipients 

eligible for the credit at the end of 2013. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2013 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio (for himself, Mr. TURNER, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. 

O’ROURKE, and Mrs. DAVIS of California) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for continued eligibility for the health care tax credit 

for PBGC pension recipients eligible for the credit at 

the end of 2013. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUED ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH CARE 

4 TAX CREDIT FOR CERTAIN PBGC PENSION 

5 RECIPIENTS AFTER 2013. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 35 of the 

7 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at 

8 the end the following new paragraph: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2783 IH

1 ‘‘(3) EXCEPTION.— 

2 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) shall 

3 be applied without regard to subparagraph (B) 

4 thereof for months after 2013 for so long as 

5 there is not a break in coverage in the case of 

6 an eligible PBGC pension recipient for whom 

7 December 2013 is an eligible coverage month. 

8 ‘‘(B) COORDINATION.—If, for any month, 

9 subparagraph (A) applies and the individual is 

10 an eligible individual— 

11 ‘‘(i) such month shall not be taken 

12 into account under section 36B, 

13 ‘‘(ii) no penalty shall be imposed 

14 under section 5000A with respect to the el15 igible individual or any family member who 

16 is covered by qualified health insurance, 

17 and 

18 ‘‘(iii) the eligible individual shall not 

19 be treated as an eligible insured for pur20 poses of section 1402 of the Patient Pro21 tection and Affordable Care Act (relating 

22 to reduced cost-sharing for individuals en23 rolling in qualified health plans). 

24 ‘‘(C) ELECTION.—Subparagraph (A) shall 

25 not apply with respect to an eligible individual 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2783 IH

1 if the individual elects not to have a month 

2 treated as an eligible coverage month. Such 

3 election, once made, shall be irrevocable, and 

4 the individual may not thereafter be treated as 

5 an eligible individual for purposes of this sec6 tion.’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall apply to months after December 2013. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2922 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2922

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 2013

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the authority of the Supreme Court Police to protect court 
             officials away from the Supreme Court grounds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SUPREME COURT POLICE TO PROTECT 
              COURT OFFICIALS OFF SUPREME COURT GROUNDS.

    Section 6121(b)(2) of title 40, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2019''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 12, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62371-62372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26723]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA--04155]


Alstom Power, Inc., Heat Recovery Steam Generators, Kings 
Mountain, NC; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (Public Law 103-182) concerning transitional 
adjustment assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in 
accordance with section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of 
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation 
was initiated on September 14, 2000 in response to a petition filed on 
behalf of workers at Alstom Power, Incorporated, Heat Recovery Steam 
Generators, Kings Mountain, North Carolina.
    The petitioner requested that the petition for NAFTA-TAA be 
withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve 
no purposes, and the investigation has been terminated.


[[Page 62372]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of October, 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-26723 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### LOVETT v. STATE.

No. 26461.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 27, 1953.

Ash & Abbott, by Dan Abbott, Abilene, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.

In view of our disposition of this cause, a recitation of the facts will not be necessary.

Bills of exception Nos. 1 and 2 relate to the cross-examination of appellant’s fact witness Michael. Appellant had not placed his reputation as a law-abiding citizen in issue. The prosecutor asked the witness if he knew appellant’s reputation for being a peaceable and law-abiding citizen. Appellant objected. The prosecutor assured the court that by taking the stand the appellant had placed such reputation in issue. The court overruled the objection. Further on in the cross-examination, the prosecutor asked the witness, “You don’t know whether he has paid a fine one time before for driving while intoxicated?” Appellant then moved for a mistrial.

In the bill relating to this latter question, the court certified “that the continued persistence of the County Attorney in directly inferring by improper questioning of the witness, that the Defendant had been convicted of a prior offense of driving while intoxicated, which, incid *ently,*was not true; was highly 'inflammatory and prejudicial and could have .had the effect of causing the ju'ry to, find a verdict of guilty when they otherwise would have found the Defendant not guilty; and that the persistence of the County Attorney in so improperly questioning the witness resulted in the Defendant not having a fair and impartial trial.”

The court did not in any way attempt to qualify the above statement.'

In Lovett v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 483, 228 S.W.2d 855, we reversed a conviction under a- similar, situation.

*336It will be noted that the appellant had not placed his reputation as a law-abiding citizen in issue. Under such a situation, the State was precluded from putting the same in issue. Branch’s Ann. P.C., sec. 148, p. 84.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          31,129
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             522
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    503,442
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         552,604
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           532,617
<LOANS>                                        646,455
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,256,462
<DEPOSITS>                                     970,954
<SHORT-TERM>                                    18,925
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,650
<LONG-TERM>                                    177,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,256,462
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 52,272
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               31,511
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   363
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                84,146
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              36,730
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,262
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           39,884
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,203
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 459
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 25,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,641
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,750
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,891
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.75
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,567
<LOANS-PAST>                                       806
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,576
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,417
<RECOVERIES>                                       205
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,567
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,567
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.32
​
AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Amendment To Executive Employment Agreement (“Amendment”), effective June 30, 2021, hereby amends the Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated November 3, 2011, as amended to date, between Reprints Desk, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Research Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Research Solutions”), and Alan Urban (“Executive”).
WHEREAS, the parties have complied with the terms of the Agreement until the date hereof; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the terms of the Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, for the mutual promises and other consideration described herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.Section 1(d) Term is amended as follows:
Term. The term of employment of Executive by the Company pursuant to this Employment Agreement shall be for the period commencing on the Commencement Date and ending on June 30, 2022, or such earlier date that Employee’s employment is terminated in accordance with the provisions of this Employment Agreement.
Except as expressly amended or modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved and shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between this Amendment and the Agreement, this Amendment shall govern.
This Amendment and all acts and transactions pursuant hereto and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed, construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law.
This Amendment may be executed and delivered by facsimile signature and in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
​
[Signature Page Follows]



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.
​
REPRINTS DESK, INC.:
​
​
By:​ ​
Name and Title:  Roy W. Olivier, Interim CEO & President
​
​
RESEARCH SOLUTIONS, INC.:
​
​
By:​ ​
Name and Title:  Roy W. Olivier, Interim CEO & President
​
​
EXECUTIVE:
​
​
By:​ ​
Name:  Alan Urban
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0091 SAT Date: 12/3/2013 Print Date: 1/31/2014
Related cases : Health related cases: Ecotox related cases :
Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ;

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: N o Commen t Keywords : Keywords: IRR-E,MM LUNG AQUATOX-A,C Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0089-92 FATE: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) S = Dispersible VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 0-50 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = mo Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate PBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = moderate
Health : Health Summary: Absorption s poor through the skin, moderate through the GI tract, and good through the lung, based on analogs. There is concern for irritation to the eye and mucous membranes, as well as concern for adverse lung effects, based on p roperties of the PMN substance.
Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 5.1 green algal 96-h EC50 2.5 fish

_ chronic value 0.87 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.53 algal

_ chronic value 1.0 Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical class = ; MW 760; S = dispersible (P); liquid with unknown mp (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; DW hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DW TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 53

SARs SAR Class Ecotox Category
Ecotox Factors Comments:SAT Chair: J. Kwiat, 564-7653
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Washburn, Anne" <Anne.Washburn@PacifiCorp.com>

Date: 7/22/2010 3:20 PM

Subject: Re: Request for Extension of Effluent Guideline Questionnaire

Attachments: pic30665.gif; 2010-07-09 Signed DJ Request for Extension.PDF

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the Dave Johnston plant. The deadline for

your plant to submit Version 1 of the completed questionnaire is

extended to October 15, 2010. Please note that the deadline for Part G,

if applicable, is unchanged and remains 120 days after receipt of the

questionnaire.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic30665.gif)

 

 From: "Washburn, Anne" <Anne.Washburn@PacifiCorp.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "Dugan, Alan" <Alan.Dugan@PacifiCorp.com>, "Tripp, Rick" <Rick.Tripp@PacifiCorp.com>, 

"Lawson, Bill"

 <Bill.Lawson@PacifiCorp.com>, "Doak, James" <James.Doak@PacifiCorp.com>

 

 Date: 07/09/2010 01:50 PM 

 Subject: Request for Extension of Effluent Guideline Questionnaire

Ms. Alicea,

Please find the attached request for extension of the due date for our

response to the Effluent Guideline Questionnaire. In summary, we

received the questionnaire June 18, 2010, and we are requesting a 30-day

extension for a due date of October 16, 2010.

Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

Anne Washburn

Environmental Analyst
Dave Johnston Plant

Phone: 307-995-5055

Fax: 307-995-5025

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.

This e-mail, and attached files, may contain attorney-client

confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended

recipient. Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is

strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or

authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please

contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this

message.

 (See attached file: 2010-07-09 Signed DJ Request for Extension.PDF)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000095676
<NAME>                        Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  AUG-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    OCT-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                                             611
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (335)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,171
<PP&E>                                          20,179
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4,060)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,759
<BONDS>                                         18,288
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           299
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,513
<SALES>                                         10,850
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,850
<CGS>                                           (6,673)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   (6,673)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,980)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (838)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    359
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (93)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                266
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       266
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        



</TABLE>
Order filed April 2, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00774-CV

____________

GILCHRIST COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Appellant

V.

COUNTY OF GALVESTON, TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court No. 2

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-0076026

ORDER

The court has concluded there is a final appealable judgment in this case and 

a notice of appeal was timely filed. The appeal was reinstated on March 19, 2020, 

pursuant to our order of February 13, 2020. Appellant’s brief is due April 20, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain.