alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2926 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2926

To prohibit the revocation or withholding of Federal funds to programs 
      whose participants carry out voluntary religious activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2013

Mr. Alexander introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the revocation or withholding of Federal funds to programs 
      whose participants carry out voluntary religious activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom to Pray Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON WITHHOLDING FEDERAL FUNDS TO PROGRAMS WHOSE 
              PARTICIPANTS CONDUCT VOLUNTARY RELIGIOUS ACTIVITIES.

    (a) In General.--It shall be unlawful for the Federal Government to 
revoke or withhold Federal financial assistance that would otherwise be 
provided to any recipient of such assistance on the basis of religious 
activities that are conducted voluntarily and initiated by participants 
in a program or activity carried out by such recipient.
    (b) Rules of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed 
to authorize the United States or any State or political subdivision 
thereof--
            (1) to sponsor a religious activity;
            (2) to prohibit a recipient of Federal financial assistance 
        from ensuring that a religious activity does not materially and 
        substantially interfere with the orderly conduct of the program 
        or activities carried out by such recipient;
            (3) to require any person to participate in prayer or other 
        religious activity; or
            (4) to compel any employee or agent of a program or 
        activity that is carried out by a recipient of Federal 
        financial assistance to participate in an activity if the 
        content of the speech at the activity is contrary to the 
        beliefs of the employee or agent.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.17(4)

January 29, 2004

Technitrol, Inc.
1210 Northbrook Drive, Suite 385
Trevose, PA  19053

AMI Doduco, Inc.
Murray Corporate Park
1003 Corporate Drive
Export, PA  15632

Gentlemen:

Upon your acceptance of the terms of this letter agreement as evidenced by your
execution and delivery to Fleet Previous Metals Inc. (the "Consignor"), on or
before the date hereof, of a copy of this letter, Technitrol, Inc. and AMI
Doduco, Inc. (f/k/a Advanced Metallurgy, Incorporated) (collectively, the
"Customer") and the Consignor agree, effective as of the date hereto to amend
the fifth sentence of Paragraph 1 of that certain Consignment Agreement dated as
of November 18, 1997, by and between the Consignor and the Customer, as the same
may have been heretofore amended (as amended, the "Consignment Agreement"), to
read as follows:

            At no time shall the value of consigned commodities exceed (i)
            $30,000,000; (ii) such limit as the parties may agree upon; or (iii)
            such limit as Consignor may approve in its sole discretion
            ("Consignment Limit").

Except as amended hereby, the Consignment Agreement and all agreements securing
the Consignment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are in all
respects hereby ratified and affirmed.

                                           Sincerely,

                                           FLEET PRECIOUS METALS, INC.
                                           Consignor


                                           By:   /s/ Richard M. Seufert
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                   Richard M. Seufert
                                                   Senior Vice President

<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.17(4)

Technitrol, Inc.
AMI Doduco, Inc.
January 29, 2004
Page 2


ACCEPTED AND AGREED AS OF THE
29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2004.


TECHNITROL, INC.
Customer


By:      /s/ Thomas Considine
   ---------------------------------------
         Thomas J. Considine, Jr.
          Vice President and Treasurer


AMI DODUCO, INC.
Customer


By:   /s/ Thomas Considine
   ---------------------------------------
        Thomas J. Considine, Jr.
         Treasurer


The above signatory has the authority to execute the above amendment on behalf
of Technitrol, Inc.


TECHNITROL, INC.


By:     /s/ Drew A. Moyer
   ---------------------------------------
         Drew A. Moyer
         Secretary

The above signatory has the authority to execute the above amendment on behalf
of AMI Doduco, Inc.


By:     /s/ Drew A. Moyer
   ---------------------------------------
          Drew A. Moyer
          Secretary
#### Ray WHITE v. STATE.

No. 26125.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 15, 1952.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The offense is assault to murder; the punishment, three years’ confinement in.the penitentiary.

Accompanying the record is an affidavit in proper form, executed by appellant, requesting the dismissal of the appeal.

The request is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#





















Exhibit 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Lingo Media Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael P. Kraft, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Michael P. Kraft____________________

Michael P. Kraft,

Chief Executive Officer

June 30, 2004



































CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Lingo Media Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Khurram R. Qureshi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Khurram R. Qureshi______________

Khurram R. Qureshi,

Chief Financial Officer

June 30, 2004























#
Exhibit 10.29



 Exhibit 10.29 
 Current Director Compensation Arrangements 
 Mr. Gerald Birnbach, the only director employed by
the Company, is paid a fee of $500 per regular meeting attended. Non-employee directors are paid $2,500 per regular meeting attended. No fees are paid to directors for attending special meetings of the Board or for their service on Board committees.
The Chairman of the Audit Committee is paid an annual fee of $10,000. Directors are also eligible to receive stock option grants under the Company’s 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. In addition, each of Directors Harvey I. Ptashek, Charles
T. Rosen, Keith J. Rowe, Silver J. Silver and Gerald O. Woodlief are participants in the Executive Medical Reimbursement Plan, which provides reimbursement for out-of-pocket costs incurred under the Company’s general health insurance plan.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10510

____________

Monica Lynn MacConnell McReynolds, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Bell Textron, Incorporated, 

Defendant—Appellee.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CV-194

______________________________

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Monica Lynn MacConnell McReynolds brought employment 

discrimination and various state-law claims against her former employer, Bell 

Textron. The district court dismissed McReynolds’s claims with prejudice. 

McReynolds appealed. We have carefully considered the appeal in light of 

the briefs, opinion of the district court, and pertinent portions of the record. 

Having done so, we find no reversible error of fact or law. AFFIRMED.

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 12, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10510 Document: 65-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2024
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00615-CV

The State of Texas

v.

Alvaro Aguilera

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 1 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CL-16-2785-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed as appellant 

is exempt from payment. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 15, 2018
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Michael Benstock     
|Michael Benstock         
|Chief Executive Officer  
|                         
|/s/ Andrew D. Demott, Jr.
|Andrew D. Demott, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer  

Date: October 25, 2007
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Marlton  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Robert B.
Ginsburg,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  and Stephen P. Rolf,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on their
knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ Robert B. Ginsburg                       /s/ Stephen P. Rolf
-----------------------                      -------------------
Robert B. Ginsburg                           Stephen P. Rolf
Chief Executive Officer                      Chief Financial Officer

August 12, 2005                              August 12, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2995 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2995

 To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to eliminate 
   the limitation on deductibles for employer-sponsored health plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2013

  Mr. Reed (for himself, Mr. Thompson of California, and Mr. Tiberi) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to eliminate 
   the limitation on deductibles for employer-sponsored health plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Unnecessary Cap Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF LIMITATION ON DEDUCTIBLES FOR EMPLOYER-SPONSORED 
              HEALTH PLANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1302(c) of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148; 42 U.S.C. 18022(c)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (2); and
            (2) in paragraph (4)(A), by striking ``paragraphs (1)(B)(i) 
        and (2)(B)(i)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1)(B)(i)''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 2707(b) of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-6(b)) is amended by striking ``paragraphs 
(1) and (2)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall be 
effective as if included in the enactment of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148).
                                 <all>
```
TKP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0302

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

BRANDON JAMES LEWIS TOLLIE, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including November 12, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file the 

State’s response.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

October 8 2021

10/08/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0302
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              18
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      337
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        397
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   817
<PP&E>                                             421
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              423
<BONDS>                                            222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                         482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,628
<SALES>                                            389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   389
<CGS>                                              257
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     55
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 35
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        35
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### BELL v. STATE.

No. 24718.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 17, 1950.

No appearance for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, States’ Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing reads as follows:

“Now comes the appellant and moves the Court to set aside the judgment of affirm-anee rendered and entered herein on March 29, 1950, and grant a rehearing of this cause, for the following reasons, to-wit: That the Appellant’s'attorney wishes to appear before this Honorable Court in person and argue this case before this Honorable Court,”

Nothing is presented by such motion for review, and. no attorney has appeared or filed brief or argument in support of the request for rehearing.

The case has been properly disposed of and appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

Opinion approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marlton Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert B.
Ginsburg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen P. Rolf, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on their
knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



-------------------------------           ------------------------------
Robert B. Ginsburg                        Stephen P. Rolf
Chief Executive Officer                   Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2005                              May 13, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel Planning Grants: In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging 
Centers.
    Date: November 13, 2000.
    Time: 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Kenneth L. Bielat, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 8043, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-7576.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 11, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-26864 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### GARCIA v. STATE.

No. 26213.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 28, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

A jury having been waived, appellant was convicted by the court for the offense of driving a motor vehicle while intoxi*390cated; the punishment assessed at a fine of $100.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular.

The judgment is affirmed.