p.1 

OAR Box 1413 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

72) 11-1-72 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/9/2008 3:11:23 PM Sheet 72 of 114 
P.2 

Jp-Z-72 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY REPORT 

AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM, OHIO 

October 10, 1997 

Project No. 455-12-1002 

• i .-., r • 

r°Ar.iH:.;*o,sr.r 

Prepared for: 

American Standard 

605 South Ellsworth Avenue 

Salem, Ohio 44460 

Prepared by: 

Optimal Technologies, Incorporated 

575 William Pitt Way 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238 

(412) 828-7330 
P.3 

Addendum 

Destruction Efficiency Report ofthe Polyad VOC Abatement System 

Conducted at American Standard, Inc., Salem, Ohio on September 16, 1997 

Capture Efficiency 

A capture efficiency determination for each ofthe 4 sources discharging to the abatement 

system was required so that an overall control efficiency could be calculated. The 

sources were designed to provide 100% capture of VOCs. In the presence of North 

Ohio Valley Air Authority (NOVAA) officials, American Standard demonstrated 100% 

capture of VOCs by utilizing a hand-held device that propels talc dust in the form ofa 

cloud. Every opening in each source was under negative pressure while normal 

production activities were occurring. This reduced the control efficiency determination 

to a destruction efficiency measurement. 

Production Rates 

NOVAA requested that the 4 sources discharging to the abatement system be operated at 

100% capacity for the destruction efficiency test. While American Standard does not 

claim that the sources operated at theoretical maximum capacity for this test, they were 

operated at the highest level that could be achieved with current resources. A table 

showing the production rate for each source for each test run is given below: 

SOURCE 

NO. 

R008 

P008 

R018 

P009 

RUN 

#1 

22 

units 

22 

units 

1 coat 

1 batch 

RUN 

#2 

19 

units 

19 

units 

1 coat 

1 batch 

RUN 

#3 

21 

units 

21 

units 

1 coat 

1 batch 

AVERAG 

E 

20.67 

20.67 

1 

1 

R008 average coating weight/unit = 48 lbs 

P008 accelerates curing of coating applied in R008 

R018 average coating weight/coat = 100 lbs 

P009 batch size = 1500 lbs 

The average hourly controlled emission rate for the 4 combined sources was 2.43 lbs/hr. 

.'-) 

<->-
P.4 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 

SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2 

Run No. 1.! 2 

Run No. 2 2 

Run No. 3 2 

2.0 TEST PROCEDURES 3 

3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE 4 

ATTACHMENTS 

1. Sample Stream Flow Calculations and Total Hydrocarbon Analyzer Measurements 

2. Field Data Sheets and Process Information 

3. Quality Assurance 

4. Laboratory Results 
P.5 

American Standard 

Salem, OH Facility 

DRAFT DE Report 

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

American Standard operates an acrylic and fiberglass bathing vessel manufacturing facility in 

Salem, Ohio. During the manufacturing and coating processes, volatile organic compounds 

(VOCs) either evaporate into the air or are driven off while inside ovens. The VOCs emitted by 

these processes are collected by hoods or booths and are directed to the control device. 

It was the intent of American Standard to perform Destruction Efficiency (DE) testing for the 

bathing vessel manufacturing process lines at its Salem, OH facility. The purpose of DE testing 

was to detennine the destruction efficiency of the captured volatile organic compound (VOC) 

emissions in the control system (incinerator). 

Optimal Technologies, Inc. (Optimal) was hired by American Standard to perform Destruction 

Efficiency (DE) testing at this facility. This report describes specific test procedures followed 

during DE testing-on American Standard's control device. Where practical, the principals of 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 2 through 4 were utilized to 

measure the volumetric flow rate, oxygen (02), carbon dioxide (C02), and moisture content of 

the gas streams. Optimal performed DE testing utilizing total hydrocarbon (THC) analyzers with 

flame ionization detectors (FIDs) complying with the test guidelines described in U.S. EPA's 

Method 25A, Determination of Total Gaseous Organic Concentration Using a Flame Ionization 

Analvzer. During the DE testing, appropriate process lines were operating under required 

conditions. Optimal also collected one gas stream sample from the inlet and outlet for each test 

run to determine methane and acetone concentrations. Tedlar® bags were used to contain the gas . \Vi*\/ 

stream samples. The samples were sent to two qualified air quality laboratories for analyses of _ 'r„' 

methane and acetone content. The results of the~analysis enabled Optimal to subtract off any [ ^ (-„; 

methane and acetone contribution to FID concentration outputs. .-, .\'' 

The .average of tliree runs the incinerator DE is 94.7%. All results are reported as/propane;1 

equivalent*. ^ ' ' './ - . 

r\ 
P.6 

American Standard 

Salem, OH Facility 

DRAFT DE Report 

SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

Run No. 1 

Average Inlet Concentration (as propane) 245 ppm 

Average Outlet Concentration (as propane) 17 ppm 

Inlet Methane Concentration (as propane) 1.5 ppm 

Outlet Methane Concentration (as propane) 1.2 ppm 

Inlet Acetone Concentration (as propane) 18.8 ppm 

Outlet Acetone Concentration (as propane) 4.8 ppm 

Destruction Efficiency (with methane/acetone compensation) 94.4% 

Run No. 2 

Average Inlet Concentration (as propane) 248 ppm 

• Average Outlet Concentration (as propane) ; 19 ppm 

Inlet Methane Concentration (as propane) 0.6 ppm 

Outlet Methane Concentration (as propane) 1.3 ppm 

Inlet Acetone Concentration (as propane) 3.7 ppm 

Outlet Acetone Concentration (as propane) 5.5 ppm 

Destruction Efficiency (with methane/acetone compensation) .. 94.9% 

Run No. 3 

Average Inlet Concentration (as propane) 275 ppm 

Average Outlet Concentration (as propane) ;.• 20 ppm 

Inlet Methane Concentration (as propane) 3.6 ppm 

Outlet Methane Concentration (as propane) 4.0 ppm 

Inlet Acetone Concentration (as propane) 2.5 ppm 

Outlet Acetone Concentration (as propane) 2.4 ppm 

Destruction Efficiency (with methane/acetone compensation) 94.7% 

Refer to Tables 1 and 2 for the DE calculations as well as methane and acetone concentrations. 

L 
P.7 

American Standard 

Salem, OH Facility 

DRAFT DE Report 

2.0 TEST PROCEDURES 

This section describes specific test procedures followed during preliminary DE testing on the 

incinerator. During the DE testing, the process lines were operating at full capacity. The 

principals of EPA Methods 2 through 4 were utilized to measure the volumetric flow rate, 

oxygen (02), carbon dioxide (C02), and moisture content ofeach ofthe five inlet gas streams and 

the single outlet gas streams. 

To determine the DE of the incinerator, measurement of the inlet and outlet (incinerated) THCs 

took place inside the ductwork , before and after the incineration process. Two THC analyzers 

with FIDs with heated sample trains continuously measured the THCs entering and exiting the 

incinerator. Clean stainless steel probes were inserted into the gas streams (inlet and outlet) and 

attached to the heated sample lines (HSLs). This sampling procedure followed the principals 

described in EPA Method 25A. Optimal utilized JUM Model VE7 FIDs. One FID/HSL sample 

train measured the THCs in the sample stream from the inlet of the control device. The other 

FID/HSL sample train measured THCs in the sample stream exiting the outlet of the control 

device. The concentrations were continuously measured and recorded every thirty seconds by a 

datalogger. Each FID was calibrated to propane as described in the method. DE test sampling 

was performed over three 1-hour sampling runs. Spreadsheets in Attachment 1 list the THC 

emission concentrations for each test run. Attachments 2 and 3 contain the field data sheets and 

quality assurance information, respectively. 

Tedlar® bags were used to collect gas stream samples to be analyzed JOT ..methane and acetone 

content. Optimal sent the gas samples to experienced and qualified laboratories to be analyzed 

for methane content and acetone. The samples were analyzed within 72 hour's of collection. The 

gas samples were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) which has ari FID calibrated with 

methane calibration gas. Optimal's JUM Model VE7 FIDs have a 43.2% response factor for 

methane when calibrated with propane. Therefore, concentrations of methane (calibrated as 

methane) will be converted to an "as propane" response and subtracted from the average FID 

outputs. Optimal's JUM Model VE7 FIDs have a 120% response factor for acetone when 

calibrated with propane. Therefore, concentrations of acetone (calibrated as acetone) will be 

converted to an "as propane" response and subtracted from the average FID outputs. 

Attachment 4 contains laboratory analyses results. 

I 

Iv 
P.8 

American Standard 

Salem, OH Facility 

DRAFT DE Report 

3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE 

Quality assurance of the FID was determined by initial calibrations, sample bias checks, 

calibration drift checks, and determination of response times. Each FID was calibrated prior to 

the test run with zero air from a specialty gas supplier and up to three certified concentrations 

(low, middle, and high range) of propane. Secondly, a sample bias check was performed by 

comparing the calibration gas response through the sample train and directly into the instrument. 

Response times for one sample line (per instrument) was determined prior to the first test run and 

recorded. At the end of each test, zero air and one representative calibration concentration was 

introduced to each FID to determine calibration drift. All calibration data is contained in 

Attachment 3. -

'1 
P.9 

TABLE 1 

AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

September 16,1997 

Destruction Efficiency Results 

v/l methane and acetone compensation 

Point j 

rrib-iir. '••-

in 

IOI 

in 

101 

m 

101 

/OC Destruct 

Point j 

ID# 

III 

101 

III 

101 

III 

IOI 

Point 

Name 

Incinerator Inlet 

Incinerator Outlet 

* 

Incinerator Inlet 

Incinerator Outlet 

Incinerator Inlet 

Incinerator Outlet 

on Efficiencies From Each Inc 

Point 

Name 

Incinerator Inlet 

Incinerator Outlet 

Incinerator Inlet 

Incinerator Outlet 

Incinerator Inlet 

Incinerator Outlet 

Test 

Run 

1 

1 

2 

2 

3 

3 

inerator (kg/kg 

Test 

Run 

1 

1 

2 

2 

3 

3 

CO) 

(ppm) 

224.7 

11 

243.7 

12.2 

268.9 

13.6 

) 

C(Fj) 

219.0 

10.0 

236.2 

11.7 

262.9 

13.0 

C(DO) 

1 

0.6 

1 

0.4 

-2 

0.15 

Q(Fj) 

738.18 

873.06 

831.62 

851.75 

784.42 

847.33 

C(DH) 

505.5 

25.9 

508.5 

25.1 

507 

25.4 

T(F) 

60 

60 

60 

60 

60 

60 

C(H) 

494 

24.4 

494 

24.4 

494 

24.4 

K(l) 

1.83E-06 

1.83E-06 

Run #1 DE= 

I.83E-06 

1.83E-06 

Run WI DE= 

1.83 E-06 

' I.83E-06 

C(Fj) > 

(ppm) 

219.0 

10.0 

236.2 

11.7 

262.9 

13.0 

F(Bj) 

(kg) 

17.8 

1.0 

94.4% 

21.6 

1.1 

94.9% 

22.6 

1.2 

Run #3 DE= 94.7% 

AVERAGE DE = 

WHERE: 

C(Fj) = corrected average VOC concentrations of emissions at point j , ppm propane 

C(j) = corrected (for methane and acetone) average VOC concentrations measured at point j , ppm propane 

C(DO) = average system drift check concentration for zero concentration gas, ppm propane 

C(DI I) = average measured concentration for the drift check calibration gas, ppm propane 

C(H) = actual concentration of the drift check calibration gas, ppm propane 

C(Fj)= (C(j)-C(DO)] x |[C(H)/[C(DH)-C(DO)]J 

F(Bj) = total VOC content of emissions from point j , kg = C(Fj)xQ(Fj)xT(F)xK(l) 

Q(I'j) = average effluent volumetric flow rate corrected to standard conditions at point j , m3/min=dscfm x 0.0283 

T(F) = total duration of sampling run, min. 

K( 1) = 1.83 x IOE-6 kg/(m3-ppm) (factor for propane) 

94.7% 

'I 
P.10 

TABLE 2 

AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

' September 16,1997 

Destruction Efficiency Results 

methane and acetone consentrations 

FID Response 

Methane 

Acetone 

Run No. 1 

Methane 

Acetone 

Run No. 2 

Methane 

Acetone 

Run No". 3 

Methane 

Acetone 

Factors 

=43% 

=120% 

Concentration (ppm) 

Concentration (ppm) 

Concentration (ppm) 

Concentration (ppm) 

Concentration (ppm) 

Concentration (ppm) 

Lab Results 

Inlet 

3.5 

15.6 

1.5 

3.1 

8.4 

2.1 

Outlet 

2.7 

4.0 

3.1 

4.6 

9.3 

2.0 

(O ('•l 

as Propane 

Inlet Outlet 

1.5 1.2 

18:8, 4.8 

0.6 ..i 1.3 

3.7 *v 5.5 

3.6 4.0 

2.5 2.4 

a 
P.11 

ATTACHMENT 1 

SAMPLE STREAM FLOW CALCULATIONS AND 

TOTAL HYDROCARBON ANALYZER 

MEASUREMENTS 
P.12 

AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

September 16,1997 

Run No. 1 

DATE/TIME 

09/16/97 10:09:16 

09/16/97 10:09:46 

09/16/97 10:10:16 

09/16/97 10:10:46 

09/16/97 10:11:16 

09/16/97 10:11:46 

09/16/97 10:12:16 

09/16/97 10:12:46 

09/16/97 10:13:16 

09/16/97 10:13:46 

09/16/97 10:14:16 

09/16/97 10:14:46 

09/16/97 10:15:16 

09/16/97 10:15:46 

09/16/97 10:16:16 

09/16/97 10:16:46 

09/16/97 10:17:16 

09/16/97 10:17:46 

09/16/97 10:18:16 

09/16/97 10:18:46 

09/16/97 10:19:16 

09/16/97 10:19:46 

09/16/97 10:20:16 

09/16/97 10:20:46 

09/16/97 10:21:16 

09/16/97 10:21:46 

09/16/97 10:22:16 

09/16/97 10:22:46 

09/16/97 10:23:16 

09/16/97 10:23:46 

09/16/97 10:24:16 

09/16/97 10:24:46 

09/16/97 10:25:16 

09/16/97 10:25:46 

09/16/97 10:26:16 

09/16/97 10:26:46 

09/16/97 10:27:16 

09/16/97 10:27:46 

09/16/97 10:28:16 

09/16/97 10:28:46 

09/16/97 10:29:16 

09/16/97 10:29:46 

09/16/97 10:30:16 

09/16/97 10:30:46 

09/16/97 10:31:16 

09/16/97 10:31:46 

09/16/97 10:32:16 

09/16/97 10:32:46 

09/16/97 10:33:16 

09/16/97 10:33:46 

09/16/97 10:34:16 

09/16/97 10:34:46 

09/16/97 10:35:16 

09/16/97 10:35:46 

09/16/97 10:36:16 

09/16/97 10:36:46 

09/16/97 10:37:16 

09/16/97 10:37:46 

09/16/97 10:38:16 

09/16/97 10:38:46 

09/16/97 10:39:16 

INLET 

THCs 

(ppm) 

247 

232 

217 

170 

222 

308 

-- 249 

212 

162 

287 

254 

283 

221 

245 

289 

250 

221 

169-

137 

179-

291 

242. 

191. 

172 

245-

275-

292 

203 

239 

248 

279 

254 

212 

260 

286 

324 

288 

209 

194 

217 

292 

281 

253 

235 

247 

240 

334 

305 

300 

270 

227 

335 

341 

298 

243 

345 

238 

345 

300 

313 

225 

OUTLET 

THCs 

(ppm) 

9 

10 

9 

9 

10 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

10 10 10 10 11 15 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 23 24 24 22 24 24 23 23 23 

K 
AMERICA

N STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

September 16,1997 

Run No. 1 

P.13 

i 

DATE/TIME I 

09/16/97 10:39:46 I 

09/16/97 10:40:16 ! 

09/16/97 10:40:46 

09/16/97 10:41:16 

09/16/97 10:41:46 ) 

09/16/97 10:42:16 i 

09/16/97 10:42:46 

09/16/97 10:43:16 

09/16/97 10:43:46 

09/16/97 10:44:16 

09/16/97 10:44:46 

09/16/97 10:45:16 

09/16/97 10:45:46 

09/16/97 10:46:16 

09/16/97 10:46:46 

09/16/97 10:47:16 

09/16/97 10:47:46 

09/16/97 10:48:16 

09/16/97 10:48:46 

09/16/97 10:49:16 

09/16/97 10:49:46 

09/16/97 10:50:16 

09/16/97 10:50:46 

09/16/97 10:51:16 

09/16/97 10:51:46 

09/16/97 10:52:16 

09/16/97 10:52:46 

09/16/97 10:53:16 

09/16/97 10:53:46 

09/16/97 10:54:16 

09/16/97 10:54:46 

09/16/9710:55:16 

09/16/97 10:55:46 

09/16/97 10:56:16 

09/16/97 10:56:46 

09/16/97 10:57:16 

09/16/97 10:57:46 

09/16/97 10:58:16 

09/16/97 10:58:46 

09/16/97 10:59:16 

09/16/97 10:59:46 

09/16/97 11:00:16 

09/16/97 11:00:46 

09/16/97 11:01:16 

09/16/97 11:01:46 

09/16/97 11:02:16 

09/16/97 11:02:46 

09/16/97 11:03:16 

09/16/97 11:03:46 

09/16/97 11:04:16 

09/16/97 11:04:46 

09/16/97 11:05:16 

09/16/97 11:05:46 

09/16/97 11:06:16 

09/16/97 11:06:46 

09/16/97 11:07:16 

09/16/97 11:07:46 

09/16/97 11:08:16 

09/16/97 11:08:46 

Averages 

INLET 

THCs 

(ppm) 

179 

155 

221 

274 

337 

258 

181 

161 

161 

263 

248 

289 

176 

233 

222 

290 

338 

272 

197 

396 

293 

262 

180 

239 

248 

242 

209 

238 

177 

352 

305 

274 

247 

181 

150 

133 

218 

301 

262 

224 

164 

135 

342 

269 

226 

211 

216 

155 

253 

269 

306 

239 

177 

294 

328 

306 

195 

161 

138 

245 

OUTLET 

THCs 

(ppm) 23 23 24 24 24 23 22 21 22 23 23 23 22 21 21 22 23 22 22 21 22 23 23 23 23 24 23 22 22 22 22 22 21 20 20 22 22 21 21 20 19 18 19 20 20 19 18 17 17 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 17 18 17 17 

1 
P.M 

AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

September 16,1997 

Run No. 2 

DATE/TIME 

09/16/97 11:21:43 

09/16/97 11:22:13 

09/16/97 11:22:43 

09/16/97 11:23:13 

09/16/97 11:23:43 

09/16/97 11:24:13 

09/16/97 11:24:43 

09/16/97 11:25:13 

09/16/97 11:25:43 

09/16/97 11:26:13 

09/16/97 11:26:43 

09/16/97 11:27:13 

09/16/97 11:27:43 

09/16/97 11:28.13 

09/16/97 11:28:43 

09/16/97 11:29:13 

09/16/97 11:29:43 

09/16/97 11:30:13 

09/16/97 11:30:43 

09/16/97 11:31:13 

09/16/97 11:31.43 

09/16/97 11:32:13 

09/16/97 11:32:43 

09/16/97 11:33:13 

09/16/97 11:33:43 

09/16/97 11:34:13 

09/16/97 11:34:43 

09/16/97 11:35:13 

09/16/97 11:35:43 

09/16/97 11:36:13 

09/16/97 11:36:43 

09/16/97 11:37:13 

09/16/97 11:37:43 

09/16/97 11:38:13 

09/16/97 11:38:43 

09/16/97 11:39:13 

09/16/97 11:39:43 

09/16/97 11:40:13 

09/16/97 11:40:43 

09/16/97 11:41:13 

09/16/97 11:41:43 

09/16/97 11:42:13 

09/16/97 11:42:43 

09/16/97 11:43:13 

09/16/97 11:43:43 

09/16/97 11:44:13 

09/16/97 11:44:43 

09/16/97 11:45:13 

09/16/97 11:45:43 

09/16/97 11:46:13 

09/16/97 11:46:43 

09/16/97 11:47:13 

09/16/97 11:47:43 

09/16/97 11:48:13 

09/16/97 11:48:43 

09/16/97 "11:49::i3" " 

09/16/97 11:49:43 

09/16/97 11:50:13 

09/16/97 11:50:43 

09/16/97 11:51:13 

09/16/97 11:51:43 

INLET 

THCs 

(ppm) 

287 

249 

330 

241 

323 

363 

314 

237 

177 

236 

162 

228 

200 

251 

269 

251 

180 

311 

267 

346 

222 

309 

345 

417 

332 

295 

238 

333 

388 

327 

276 

211 

• 293 

308 

321 

321 

249 

227 

215 

192 

252 

165 

142 

244 

185 

290 

281 

311 

240 

322 

183 

399 

308 

275 

264 

"" 305 

206 

343 

272 

355 

236 

OUTLET 

THCs 

(ppm) 15 17 18 18 17 17 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 17 18 17 18 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 20 21 21 21 20 . 21 21 22 21 21 21 21 20 21 21 20 20 19 20 19 19 19 19 20 21 21 21 21 22 21 22 22 22 

•J) 
P.15 

AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

September 16,1997 

Run No. 2 

DATE/TIME 

09/16/97 11:52:13 

09/16/97 11:52:43 

09/16/97 11:53:13 

09/16/97 Yi :53:43" 

09/16/97 i 1:54:13 

09/16/97 11:54:43 

09/16/97 11:55:13 

09/16/97 11:55:43 

09/16/97 11:56:13 

09/16/97 11:56:43 

09/16/97 11:57:13 

09/16/97 11:57:43 

09/16/97 11:58:13 

09/16/97 11:58:43 

09/16/97 11:59:13 

09/16/97 11:59:43 

09/16/97 12:00:13 

09/16/97 12:00:43 

09/16/97 12:01:13 

09/16/97 12:01:43 

09/16/97 12:02:13 

09/16/97 12:02:43 

09/16/97 12:03:13 

09/16/97 12:03:43 

09/16/97 12:04:13 

09/16/97 12:04:43 

09/16/97 12:05:13 

09/16/97 12:05:43 

09/16/97 12:06:13 

09/16/97 12:06:43 

09/16/97 12:07:13 

09/16/97 12:07:43 

09/16/97 12:08:13 

09/16/97 12:08:43 

09/16/97 12:09:13 

09/16/97 12:09:43 

09/16/97 12:10:13 

09/16/97 12:10:43 

09/16/97 12:11:13 

09/16/97 12:11:43 

09/16/97 12:12:13 

09/16/97 12:12:43 

09/16/97 12:13:13 

09/16/97 12:13:43 

09/16/97 12:14:13 

09/16/97 12:14:43 

09/16/97 12:15:13 

09/16/97 12:15:43 

09/16/97 12:16:13 

09/16/97 12:16:43 

09/16/97 12:17:13 

09/16/97 12:17:43 

£9/16/97 12:18:13 

09/16/97 12:18:43 

[09/16/97 12:19:13 

09/16/97 12:19:43 

09/16/97 12:20:13 

09/16/97 12:20:43 

09/16/97 12:21:13 

Averages 

INLET ! 

THCs j 

(ppm) j 

176| 

287 

283 

253 j 

207'j 

184 

241 

183 

358 

292 

260 

177 

291 

261 

253 

325 

195 

241 

384 

297 

255 

255 

168 

298 

301 

256 

287 

206 

164 

134 

279 

278 

282 

177 

259 

169 

137 

118 

145 

366 

292 

238 

154" 

196 

293 

267 

333 

194 

150 

126 

115 

101 

. 91 

102 

137 

110 96 

233 

249 

248 

OUTLET 

THCs 

(ppm) 23 

22'. 

22 22 21 

~2T 

21" 

" 2'i 21 21 21 20 19 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 16 16 16 16 17 17 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 20 19 19 

H 
P.16 

AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

September 16,1997 

Run No. 3 

I 

DATE/TIME 

09/16/97 13:03:38 I 

09/16/97 13:04:08 

09/16/97 13:04:38 " 

09/16/971305:08 i 

09/16/97 13:05:38 ! 

09/16/97 13:06:08 

09/16/97 13:06:38 

09/16/97 '13:07:08" 

09/16/97 13:07:38"" " 

09/16/97 13:08:08 

09/16/97 13:08:38 

09/16/97 13:09:08 

09/16/97 13:09:38 

09/16/97 13:10:08 

09/16/97 13:10:38 

09/16/97 13:11:08 

09/16/97 13:11:38 

09/16/97 13:12:08 

09/16/97 13:12:38 

09/16/97 13:13:08 

09/16/97 13:13:38 

09/16/97 13:14:08 

09/16/97 13:14:38 

09/16/97 13:15:08 

09/16/97 13:15:38 

09/16/97 13:16:08 

09/16/97 13:16:38 

09/16/97 13:17:08 

09/16/97 13:17:38 

09/16/97 13:18:08 

09/16/97 13:18:38 

09/16/97 13:19:08 

09/16/97 13:19:38 

09/16/97 13:20:08 

09/16/97 13:20:38 

09/16/97 13:21:08 

09/16/97 13:21:38 

09/16/97 13:22:08 

09/16/97 13:22:38 

09/16/97 13:23:08 

09/16/97 13:23:38 

09/16/97 13:24:08 

09/16/97 13:24:38 

09/16/97 13:25:08 

09/16/97 13:25:38 

09/16/97 13:26:08 

09/16/97 13:26:38 

09/16/97 13:27:08 

09/16/97 13:27:38 

09/16/97 13:28:08 

09/16/97 13:28:38 

09/16/97 13:29:08 

09/16/97 13:29:38 

09/16/97 13:30:08 

09/16/97 13:30:38 

09/16/97 13:31:08 

09/16/97 13:31:38 

09/16/97 13:32:08 

09/16/97 13:32:38 

09/16/97 13:33:08 

09/16/97 13:33:38 

INLET 

THCs 

(ppm) 

285 

175 

"124" 

291 

243 

282 

177 

397' 

312 

270 

166 

262 

256 

312 

178 

239 

161 

344 

297 

271 

167 

285 

288 

279 

303 

180 

133 

357 

282 

379 

.179 

370 

292 

389 

235 

163 

133 

193 

128 

208 

150 

413 

. 301 

367 

191 

459 

367 

319 

309 

336 

309 

379 

269, 

193 

438 

389 

350 

439 

313 

458 

404 

OUTLET 

THCs 

(ppm) 

8 

10 

9 

9 

9 

10 11 

. 13 13 13 13 14 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 17 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 17 

. 17 18 18 18 18 19 19 22 21 19 18 17 18 18 21 21 22 21 24 23 23 22 23 23 23 22 21 23 

I K. 
P.17 

AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

September 16,1997 

Run No. 3 

DATE/TIME 

09/16/97 13:34:08 

09/16/97 13:34:38 " T 

09/i 6/97 13:35:08 

09/16/97 13:35:38 , 

09/16/97 13:36:08 

09/16/97 13:36:38 

09/16/97 13:37:08 

09/16/97 13:37:38 

09/16/97 13:38.08 

09/16/97 13:38:38 

09/16/97 13:39:08 

09/16/97 13:39:38 

09/16/97 13:40:08 

09/16/97 13:40:38 

09/16/97 13:41:08 

09/16/97 13:41:38 

09/16/97 13:42:08 

09/16/97 13:42:38 

09/16/97 13:43:08 

09/16/97 13:43:38 

09/16/97 13:44:08 

09/16/97 13:44:38 

09/16/97 13:45:08 

09/16/97 13:45:38 

09/16/97 13:46:08 

09/16/9713:46:38 

09/16/97 13:47:08 

09/16/97 13:47:38 

09/16/97 13:48:08 

09/16/97 13:48:38 

09/16/97 13:49:08 

09/16/97 13:49:38 

09/16/97 13:50:08 

09/16/97 13:50:38 

09/16/97 13:51:08 

09/16/97 13:51:38 

09/16/97 13:52:08 

09/16/97 13:52:38 

09/16/97 13:53:08 

09/16/97 13:53:38 

09/16/97 13:54:08 

09/16/97 13:54:38 

09/16/97 13:55:08 

09/16/97 13:55:38 

09/16/97 13:56:08 

09/16/97 13:56:38 

09/16/97 13:57:08 

09/16/97 13:57:38 

09/16/97 13:58:08 

09/16/97 13:58:38 

09/16/97 13:59:08 

09/16/97 13:59:38 

09/16/97 14:00:08 

09/16/97 14:00:38 

09/16/97 14:01:08 

09/16/97 14:01:38 

09/16/97 14:02:08 

Averages 

INLET | OUTLET 

THCs THCs 

(ppm) (ppm) 

488 

314 

253 

266 

247 

356 

401 

321 

248 

315 

280 

307 

236 

167 

218 

174 

298 

360 

283 

268 

323 

211 

265 

374 

299 

293 

219 

177 

372 

314 

283 

381 

206 

248 

327 

432 

331 

276 

272 

189 

142 

127 

203 

140 

116 

240 

328 

278 

248 

188 

296 

344 

275 

296 

188 

147 

121 

275 

24 24 25 24 25 26 27 25 24 23 23 24 25 24 23 23 24 23 22 21 21 21 22 23 22 23 23 22 22 24 23 23 21 22 24 23 24 24 22 22 23 25 24 24 23 22 20 20 20 19 19 20 22 22 22 23 22 20 

i£ 
AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

September 16,1997 

OXIDIZER INLET FLOWS 

RUN NO. 1 

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 

North South 

Tooling Cure Spray Spray 

Booth Oven Mixer Booth Booth 

fr6:l,*fiOsW! 

0.330 

82.0 ^ 

0.00 

'. 20.00 

180.00 

28.96 

-0.03 

28.96 -

0.99 

28.10 

0.370 

88.0^''* 

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

0.60 

29.00--

0.99 

12.00 

SQRT(dP = Average of square roots of pitot pressure, in. water 

Ts = Average stack temperature, deg. F 

C02 = C02 in stack gas, % 

02 = 02 in stack gas, % 

CO+N2 = CO and N2 in stack gas, % ' 

Pbar = Barometric pressure, in. Hg. 

Pa = Static pressure, in. water 

Ps = Stack pressure (absolute), in. Hg. 

Cp = Pitot correction factor, dimensionless 

Ds = Diameter of stack, in. 

Bws = Moisture content ofthe gas stream, % 

CALCULATED VALUES 

As = Area ofthe stack, sq. ft. 

Md = Dry molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis, lb/lb-mo

 : 

Ms = Molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis, lb/lb-mole 

GAS FLOW , 

Vs = Stack velocity, ft/sec = 22.61 25.45 

Qs = Stack gas flow, acfm = 5842 . 1199 

Qsd = Stack gas flow, dscfm = 5393 1100 

TOTAL FLOW OF ALL INLET SOURCES, dscf = 26084 

1.140 

85.054' 

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

6.30 

29.42-

0.99 

6.00 

1.9-^ 

. / • 

0.1964 

" 28JW. 

"28.59 

77.66 

915 

855 

0.340 

' 76.0-' 

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

-0.30 

28.94 * 

0.99 

34.00 

1.9 

63050' 

28.80 

28.59 

23.16 

876 r 

8189 

0.440 

80.0^?° 

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

-0.40 

28.93-

0.99 

34.00 

2.0-^ 

6.3C 

28.80 

'28.58}/ ^ 

30.09 

11383 

10547 

TJ 

co 
AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

September 16,1997 

OXIDIZER OUTLET FLOWS 

RUN NO. 1 

GAS FLOW 

\ lI OK 7 X 

Y\ 

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 

SQRT(dP = Average of square roots of pitot pressure, in. water 

Ts = Average stack temperature, deg. F = 

C02 = C02 in stack gas, % 

02 = 02 in stack gas, % 

C0+N2 = CO and N2 in stack gas, % 

Pbar = Barometric pressure, in. Hg. = 

Pa = Static pressure, in. water = 

Ps = Stack pressure (absolute), in. Hg. = 

Cp = Pitot correction factor, dimensionless = 

Ds = Diameter of stack, in. = 

Bws = Moisture content ofthe gas stream, % = 

CALCULATED VALUES 

As = Area ofthe stack, sq. ft. = 

Md = Dry molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis, Ib/lb-mo = 

Ms = Molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis, lb/lb-mole = 

Incinerator 

Outlet 

106.0^ > 

0.00 

. 20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

(28.96^ r t 

"6.99 

43.00 

B>"V5 1-5 „ 

_/&> 

.10.08473 A •> 

' -20 0 "S^- 0 0 

2&64"2?f.8'Z- A*: 

GAS FLOW 

Vs = Stack velocity, ft/sec 

Qs = Stack gas flow, acfm 

Qsd = Stack gas flow, dscfm 

^ 3 3 5 6 -I* 

34689 

.30850 ^oiy? 

CO 
AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

September 16,1997 

OXIDIZER INLET FLOWS 

RUN NO. 2 

O 

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 

SQRT(dP = Average of square roots of pitot pressure, in. water 

Ts = Average stack temperature, deg. F 

C02 = C02 in stack gas, % 

02 = 02 in stack gas, % 

CO+N2 = CO and N2 in stack gas, % 

Pbar = Barometric pressure, in. Hg. 

Pa = Static pressure, in. water 

Ps = Stack pressure (absolute), in. Hg. 

Cp = Pitot correction factor, dimensionless 

Ds = Diameter of stack, in. 

Bws = Moisture content ofthe gas stream, % 

CALCULATED VALUES 

As = Area ofthe stack, sq. ft. 

Md = Dry molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis, lb/lb-mo

 : 

Ms = Molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis, lb/lb-mole 

GAS FLOW 

Vs = Stack velocity, ft/sec 

Qs = Stack gas flow, acfm 

Qsd = Stack gas flow, dscfm 

TOTAL FLOW OF ALL INLET SOURCES, dscf = 29386 

Tooling 

Booth 

0.350 

84.0-j1-! 

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

0.31 

28.98 v/ 

0.99 

28.10 

2.1 

•*.•-•£ 

C" 43667 

28.80 

28,57 

24.01 

6204 

5711 

Cure 

Oven Mixer 

0.370 1.080 

L

* 92.0

 CJC

y 92.0 -''' 

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.94 

0.38 

28.97^' 

0.99 

12.00 

1.9 

.-5 ' 

0.7854 

28.80 

28.59 

25.57 

1205 

1095 

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

6.30 

29.42" 

0.99 

6.00 

1.9 

0.1964 

28.80 

28.59 

74.04 

872 

805 

North 

Spray 

Booth 

0.430 

"-'Jm 80.0 5 ' 

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

-0.48 

28.92 -

0.99 

34.00 

1.8 

.

 ;H' 

63050 

28.80 

28.61 

29.40 

11122 

10324 

South 

Spray 

Booth 

0.480 

^ se^o y

i / ? 

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

-0.52 

28.92 ^ 

0.99 

34.00 

1.9 

* ' • • > 

6.3050 "' 

28.80 

28.59 

33.01 

12488 

11451 

ho 
AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

September 16,1997 

V lOXIDIZER OUTLET FLOWS 

RUN NO. 2 

GAS FLOW 

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 

Incinerator 

Outlet 

SQRT(dP = Average of square roots of pitot pressure, in. water 

Ts = Average stack temperature, deg. F 

C02 = C02 in stack gas, % 

02 =02 in stack gas, % 

C0+N2 = CO and N2 in stack gas, % 

Pbar = Barometric pressure, in. Hg. 

Pa = Static pressure, in. water 

Ps = Stack pressure (absolute), in. Hg. 

Cp = Pitot correction factor, dimensionless 

Ds = Diameter of stack, in. 

Bws = Moisture content ofthe gas stream, % 

CALCULATED VALUES 

As = Area ofthe stack, sq. ft. 

Md = Dry molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis, lb/lb-mo

 : 

Ms = Molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis, lb/lb-mole 

0.800-4P 

106.0 5&'-: 

V-z 

GAS FLOW 

Vs = Stack velocity, ft/sec 

Qs = Stack gas flow, acfm 

Qsd = Stack gas flow, dscfm 

45,93 Cfi& 

33842 

20O97 yx^ 

ho 
AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

September 16,1997 

OEXIDIZER INLET FLOWS 

RUN NO. 3 

-J 

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 

SQRT(dP = Average of square roots of pitot pressure, in. water 

Ts = Average stack temperature, deg. F 

C02 = C02 in stack gas, % 

02 =02 in stack gas, % 

CO+N2 = CO and N2 in stack gas, % 

Pbar = Barometric pressure, in. Hg. 

Pa = Static pressure, in. water 

Ps = Stack pressure (absolute), in. Hg. 

Cp = Pitot correction factor, dimensionless 

Ds = Diameter of stack, in. 

Bws = Moisture content ofthe gas stream, % 

CALCULATED VALUES 

As = Area ofthe stack, sq. ft. 

Md = Dry molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis, lb/lb-mo

 : 

Ms = Molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis, lb/lb-mole 

GAS FLOW 

Vs = Stack velocity, ft/sec 

Qs = Stack gas flow, acfm 

Qsd = Stack gas flow, dscfm 

TOTAL FLOW OF ALL INLET SOURCES, dscf = 27718 

Tooling 

Booth 

0.280 

Cure 

Oven Mixer 

0.330 _ 

86.(X/^ 96.0 £5'--

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

-0.05 

28.96" 

0.99 

~28iio 

- M\ 

E 4.3067 

28.80" 

28.57' 

J-9.25 

4974 

4558 

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

0.56 

29.00 " 

0.99 

12.00 

!fa 

0.7854 

28.80 

. 28.63 

22.86 

1077 

976 

1.150 

91.0* 

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

6.40 

29.43' 

0.99 

6.00 

1.8 

0.1964 

28.80 

28.61 

78.73 

928 

859 

North 

Spray 

Booth 

0.420 

y so.o^1 

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

-0.48 

28.92-

0.99 

34.00 

1.8 

6.3050 

28.80 

28.61 

28.71 

10861 

10082 

South 

Spray 

Booth 

0.470 . 

^ 84.0^ ( ( 

0.00 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

-0.41 

28.93' 

0.99 

34.00 

1.8 

•"'iJ. 

6.3050 

28.80 

28.61 

32.25 

12200 

11243 
AMERICAN STANDARD 

SALEM OHIO FACILITY 

DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

September 16,1997 

\ 

'•• i '. 

< --'.>' ( -

- .y 

i • 

OXIDIZER OUTLET FLOWS 

RUN NO. 3 

GAS FLOW 

S> 

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 

SQRT(dP = Average of square roots of pitot pressure, in. water 

Ts = Average stack temperature, deg. F 

C02 = C02 in stack gas, % 

02 = 02 in stack gas, % 

CO+N2 = CO and N2 in stack gas, % 

Pbar = Barometric pressure, in. Hg. 

Pa = Static pressure, in. water 

Ps = Stack pressure (absolute), in. Hg. 

Cp = Pitot correction factor, dimensionless 

Ds = Diameter of stack, in. 

Bws = Moisture content ofthe gas stream, % 

CALCULATED VALUES 

As = Area ofthe stack, sq. ft. 

Md = Dry molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis, Ib/lb-mo

 : 

Ms = Molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis, lb/lb-mole 

Incinerator 

Outlet 

IO.SOOV-V 

112.0 r."'-' 

o.oo 

20.00 

80.00 

28.96 

-0.03 

•'.28796 V" . 

0.99 

43.00 

1-5, „ . 

10.0847 V 

28:80

 :? ° • " 

-28:64 ~:\<3/lsP.'. 

GAS FLOW 

Vs = Stack velocity, ft/sec 

Qs = Stack gas flow, acfm 

Qsd = Stack gas flow, dscfm 

-56,23 $ £ 1° 

34024 

29941 
P.24 

ATTACHMENT 2 

FIELD DATA SHEETS AND 

PROCESS INFORMATION 

• - > 
Polyad Monitoring Log 

September 16,1997 

480 

460 

440 

420 

400 

380 

360 

340 

320 

300 

280 

260 

240 

220 

200 

180 

160 

140 

-fa—Oxidizer Temp. 

*• Desorber Inlet Temp. 

-Desorber Outlet Temp. 

•Desorber Diff. Pressure 

3 

2 

& 

E 

,**-*: 0_ *.~*-*<.0m<>!--\_s*s.m. ">"Q y^ w ii^i'-^f,*I I ' * •• 

Sr 

fe ^ 

120 

100 

0 -kiiiMiiiiiuiiiii^ 

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o 

oooooooooooooooooooooooooo o 

iHuscocno^N^'-ViHtosacho^Nn^ifliosooid^Nn ^ 

T". Ci '?? T*-. f. Tt Ci f?. f. T>P . ^NO^ro^N n •»wo-^wrtuio^wrt-*-oo^TM-»ino-r-M<o-*ino*- ; 

i'oii'ijjisshSNi'oooorooia'o-jiiidd o 

Time 

American Standard Co.'s 

ro 

Ol 
P.26 

gf>A &.0-V [' f~^Lr^ 

<?// ^/*- 7 ^ •r^^rj -WsJi* T:ff/lML 

'/>. ^ C^1^^p,_ 

5r: ?j r 3 7 

55 <. •?/ .' 10 

y 

A*-Jr 

y-yS" 

X.Q7S' 

? £ 7 $ 

XC^Ji 

2.C.7S 

1 1 (r. B-^. 

*-T_~ ^ v ? /.~ot>fc<„ - /;V ^ 

^'-'it'Mf &*j. *- £6ay 7< ? 

1: t7Uo 

%JTS 

1 m.tC 

ij.r 

n 5 
P.27 

9!/y^3 fU^ jx.lJ.Co 

7.i.?:z 5 5.A*/*. fir-pro^ ui-/~f£&^ 

iy I'.aY ty^ 

T. Mey ( ^^ _ 

?;te:*( fry. 

v.iyAH ^ 

? - ^fv 30 f~^-p^ Qo Cd 

y.¥z: 52- ' x6& ( 

?'. 5'oiz 7 /e^ , 2L£G^ 

/t>: 00:0^ fUmJ^ 

^^Jj flc^C-1 V-Jt. 

•y ft: yy RJ^. 

/. : 3fr\ 00 peg9 

to '„ti y^ K$$ 

i'O: *??<£-* ^6 7 5' 

0 to \ V?.' i f A£75 

X-
P.28 

5 / •' :• 5 *: / •¥ /S^, 

5 /;.

 c ^ / 3> /-^ - ; 

6' /r. D6;^7 &^ -

?2_ // ; ^ f • ^ •*- -^ ^ . 

* * y 

5' 3 A '2.^; 0*> (^p S-TM*-

Ti ir.r-^'. JY ^' / ^ ^ 

?<? /nijtfZr- .<*f 

fr ayo'-^n- /&*. 

7 ? - //:?£.!$4 /yp 

9 7 1 i.(iry iz.r fc*. 

?ff /y,(/y1 fu^. H=* 

vc yln< -*-( £yp 

< i ,x.\ ?-*• $7 !~^ ^c£7 ' ' *-

/ ? n. ?*:zs Py^r 
P.29 

'OG )?>:#<) I Zm-T fZe^,. fx_y ^ 

•ol ,^-^-<*r<L , ' $ oi roc p^c~ 

fo'j /:t>7i >s- /u^ /iB3? /% ^ W/£~ 

/ / * I'. Of! 3,0 /^ , , ?;> 

/// ji/z'.rx-o /e^ . 

/ / £ /;r ^ : 36 /c^. 

//J / :< 7- z-i &?, 

It 4 ) : xfi?4 A ^ 

I(y /!x6)z*. fy jU^ 

IPO ttl3:>L ^ 

r^ 3 I:HSA2.H r^, . 

/ * * /:$'*:?£ - <£&, •? 3, 

/xf ^'.c^ion A&cr-^r^ ^r ?^J-$-p~<^., &',^JU~ 

1x7 ' 

1 30 

131 

rl-*-

/i* 

! 34 

n p 

C }< 

J '••J y^ td 
P.30 

RAVI.NSr POINI LOCA! ION ION RECIANGUI.AH OUCIS 

L^nlo _....9-J.Xr_9f^.... _ 

\ 

4 Sampling location 

Duel wkllli. Inclir?s 2)3$ '' 

Inside ol Inr wnll lo outside ol nipple.... 

Inside ol nnni wnll lo outside ol nipple (nipple tftngllf)' 

Duel l.enqlh. Indies 7 A U 

""'•'«W

 ,**r

"" 

i E(|ulvnlenl dlmncloi « 2 x L x W / (L •»• W) 

t 

4,. 

j 

3^-77 Inches 

Distance dowtislieam hom llow disluibance (Ulslance B): 

y \A **SrJ.y.*i. .Inches / equivalent diameter = ^> o dd 

Dlslanco upstieam fiom llow dlslmbanco (Dlslonce A): 

y\\ *\^r 3 i • Inches / equivalent dlameler = 1»@ dd 

Calculated by 

v/ 

Tji 

~J&~~ 

,^0.1 . unAuc' 

u<Mv<i( u"" 

:- IITI 

JS OlSM/IUANCf 

l 

W 

• ^^f'^ 

T£) >£ Vl<SU>-

SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION 

inAVLRSE 

POINT 

NO. ron 

EACH PORT 

-* k _XL__. 

J 

£. . 

1 

1 

rnAcriou 

or 

LENGTH 

1 

UHCIII 

(In.) 

-3.1 

\ Lo 

32-9 

vb-A 

PRODUCT or 

COLUMNS Z ANO 3 * 

(TO NEAREST J/8 In.) 

NIPPLE 

LEHOIII 

(fn.) 

• 1 

TRAVERSE POINr 

LOCATION SUM OF 

COLUMNS 4 AND 9 

IP NO POM IS. CAICOIA1E DISIANCES PROM STACK WALLS POll POf 11 LOCA! IONS 

N O. or 

ron is 

TRACTION 

or 

WIDTH 

WIOIII 

(In.) 

paTr 

LOCATION » PRODUCT 

OF COLUMNS 2 MU 3 M 

(TO NEAREST 1/8 In.) 

l\ (AC. I'i. 

/ . 

'All polnls or poils should bo an equal distance liom each other (D) and one-halt ol Ihal distance 

Itom tho slack walls (D/2), wlwro D •- WkJtli / No. ol points or polls. 

.'-) c 1 
P.31 

Plant ft^^HCft'A S*fovi<WV. 

Dale Q - / flC^T 

Sampling location Tap * lift-Si fi«»ftt4*K -^vfU 4 ** ' 

Insldo ol lar won to ouis'de oi nipple *—•—-

Inside ol near wall io ouir.nJe ol nipple (nipple len-yili): 

Slack inside diameier, inches QLQ t I 

DIslance downstream hom llow disturbance (Distance 8): 

A A Hiw-' inciies / diamelei •= ' '• ' dd 

DIslance upstream liom |low dislurbance (Distance A): 

<*> o ' Indies./ diameter - I.O dd 

Calculaled by M. 

) -/0'1IU«»*NC( 

U|IIIII|V|I I 

:• nn 

([oi»'c 

. H-unz.et'f.jxf P*-tf~ 

. On B-oe-A 

r^ y 

SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION 

TRAVERSE 

fOIKl 

HVK8EII 

1 

2-

3 

V 

3 

C 

fRACTIOK 

or STACK 1.0. 

Qin-i-A 

''iN* > 

O , "J. •*'/1/ 

J

 , 10' 

0 . -y,r\ ' 

°;q<.# 

MACK 1.0. 

J . _ 

TROOUCT or 

COI WNS J AKO 1 

nO*(ARUTMIHCH| 

1,2 -

w,/\ 

<+y 

IHA 

PH.O 

. 7M . 

HIPPIE 

I.EI'GTH 

1—•——— — 

.-

. 

-

TRAVERSE r-OIKT LOCATION 

TRCWOimiOEOf KlPfLt 

am or COLUKKJ I I $I 

tape* 

°?0 
Planl rJ**\4V*\tcM 'SkivtAaiAi 

Date ^-/T-q ^ 

Sampling location 

Insldo ol lar wan to outside o' nipple — 

Inside ol near wall to outside ot nipplo (nipple lenyih): 

Slack Inside diameier. inches ia,ofr 

Distance downstream hom llow disturbance (Distance B): 

^ ^.zjt^. inches / diamelei •= H'*. \ T*> dd 

Distance upstream hom How disturbance (Distance A): 

^

a

 oll O Indies./ diameter.. I i"Vr dd 

Calculated by PT 

,y/oiiTu* 

U|»IV«I«(«I 

:• HK 

I OUIU-MANCI 

J 

SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION 

TRAVERSE 

POIKT 

NUMBER 

I 

z 

~

J

J> 

l ~ 

s . 

1/ 

1 1 

TRACTION 

Of STACK 1.0. 

O.&A'A 

<y\Hb 

i), 2.^1 (A 

n.'/cH . 

o. >yy 

V. (\-:.u. 

•• 

STACK I.O. 

, 

TROOUCT or 

COLUMNS J AKO 1 

nOREARUT I' l IRCHI 

c>.£^— l.O 

1. ST. 

3. U 

«.H 

y>,7-

. H.^lhD 

HIPPIE 

LECGTH 

—-t — •• 

.-

• ' 

TRAVERSE MIRT LOCATION 

rnotioimioEor hirrtt 

(SIM or C0LUKKS 1 t S| 

.Jt\ 

.'.V 

\ 1, { v< 

?n 
P.33 

Plant /Wf& M .Ste^cfo^ -

Dale 9-/5-9 7 

Sampling locaHon 

Insldo ol lar wail to outs*de o' nipple " 

Inside ot near wall to ouisnJo ol nipplo (nipple lenoih): 

Slack Inside diameier, inches & • 0 l l 

Distance downstream hom Mow disturbance (Distance B) 

>\£ oLOO j nche s 7 (jiamelei •* '•-• " ^ dd 

Distance upstream hom (low disluibance (Distance A): 

11 Indies./ diameter «• o'**- dd 

Calculated by . 9T 

ra 

i 

O'llVUNCI 

ui tivmuoi 

:• mt 

i lomuN SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION 

TRAVERSE 

fOINT 

NUMBER 

1 

I 

3 

«•» 

" 

' 

m—mmm. r+. 

TRACTION 

or STACK 1.0. 

0,vij-] 

^ t I b>is 

& . 7 ••'." y 

.'"» r-i—. -

STACK 1.0. 

rROOUCT or 

COLUMNS J AKO J 

nOREARUT 1/1 INCH! 

O.M. ^l. c 

. I;£ : 

«^.r *.o 

• 

NIPPLE 

I.EI'GTH 

. —-|— ' • . 

.-

. 

TRAVERSE rOIRT LOCATION 

rAo* oimioE or nirrLC 

(SIM Or COLUKhS 1 l Jl 

a. 

y 
fl/lllfl.L'LI\li ir 

P.34 

Plant n^rm* " S^^avic l 

Dale <-V-ij"-Ql 

Sampling location hJOr-f^ Sprc^y {ho it , * «•/ 

Inside ol lar wan to outside oi nipple ~ 

Inside ol near wall to ouis'do ol nippio (nipple lenyili): 

Slack Inside diameicr, inches 3 ^ Q 

Distance downstream ho m How disturbance (Distance B): 

<A<4. '~s~^ ' ^ inches / diamelei -= O ' / dd 

DIslance upstream Horn (low disluibance (Distance A): 

i<-/ -J Inches./ diameter « O '<•> dd 

Calculaled by Per 

R^ 

}Ttf~ 

^ 

ra 0'lll/«»t«C I 

U(«IV«|U(I I 

:• IIK 

| OIlH/NiNCI SCH-LMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION 

TRAVERSE 

roim . 

NIW8ER 

1 

r*. 

JL 

r

< 

f 

f C 

z ?> 

<? 

10 

ff 

— ,-

FRACTION 

or STACK 1.0. 

>o2.\ 

-OG-r 

.»1? 

.m .ATO 

.3<5S 

MiH 

'ISO 

>&Z 

. 1^2 

.<?3.> 

STACK 1.0. 

•5 V 

TROOUCT or 

COLUMNS J ANO J 

PORCARUT 1/1 IRCHI 

O,7-^/.0 

'<*.3 

t • '_• 

/t,o9.K 

. 12. | 

•11 . 7 

^ sV5 

•<?7i? 

2.&ZP 

3^/(9 

'-s'l.7 

^,i^?,o 

NIPPLE 

LECGTH 

..,,._. 

.-

. 

TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION 

rRO* oimioc or Nirrtt 

aw or COLUKW 11 si 

v 

•[•-..;.< l"T"\ M...'. .?«'.*' 4-

r-

• y 

5> 
P.35 , 

VELOCIIY 1RAVERSEOATA 

...... "i&'O'b:. 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

DATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE ID : 

STATIC PRESSURE, (in! watei): 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (in. llg) 

JJr./.fc5rt:._ 

i 

. _ / 1 -{•.... 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

r 

1. 

— 

— 

— 

— 

1 

t-r 

r 

cr 

AVERAGE 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

In.waler 

+ 0£L 

0.33 V 

TEMPERATURE 

Ts 

d e 0 f 

. & . 

& > 

te. 

Air 

£X 

%x 

| lux, 

;^v- i.s-^7 

COFT^B TO 

2-1% 

3 K 
P.36 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

DATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE ID : 

STATIC PRESSURE, (i^waler): 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (in. I Ig): 

VELOCIl Y T RAVERSE DATA 

/'nor 

I TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

5 * 

rr> 

.... H 

...mJ...^.. . 

.jf... 

_£_./. 

y 

U 

AVERAGE 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

In.water 

TT 

wr-

'JUL. 

4.L 

UOalk. 

o^feq 

TEMPERATURE 

TB 

deg.F 

U 

JxL. 

..J2JJLK 

MS. 

C 

W 

V ?>7< 

^ 
P.37 

VEl 0CI1 Y I RAVERSE OATA 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

DATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE ID: 

STATIC PRESSURE, (in! wnioij: "" 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (In. I Ig): 

COn . ba 

.. I oo a _..__., j_ 

H-jy ' ~ 

2L 

3^5 

^-JU/ 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

..£JL__ 

2. 

......3 

f_ 

::i:v 

AVERAGE 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

In.water 

|..'3Y 

TEMPERATURE 

Ts 

deB- F 

i.._-,'-, 

[ ^ 

? • * 

J 
P.38 

VELOCITY TRAVERSE OATA 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

DATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE ID : 

STATIC PRESSURE, (in. water) 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (in. 

..... '.£p.a... _ 

S.Q.O. fh> .. S.OCO.AJ \^OiJ2.k\0....... * 

n. 

.k£Ij PX. '7.'~.._..._Z1_1J 

Hg): 

.- o- l l xm± 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

5.1 

z 

3 

1. 

"7 

..£_ 

10. 

Z L 

; - ^ 

2_ 

_i 

4 --

../I?. 

M 

/-z 

AVERAGE 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

In.water 

_.r /3, 

_.._•/_£ 

._/_ZO. 

_J?.3 

„..^. > 

, 2) 

/ £<9-

o,H3cf 

TEMPERATURE 

Ts 

deg.F 

......m. 

s& 

63 

_©_ 

^ b 

^ z 

_2^L 

so 

_SL^ 

i©. 

10 

<fD 

sa 

_ ^ 

_2£_ 

SlAex-. 

IOi^ 

bs£T 

T^>^-

! • 

0'' 

y J 
VEl OCRY TRAVERSE OATA 

P.39 

CLIENT: E'-i •|'>\ M; V ' 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

DATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE ID : 

STATIC PRESSURE, (in! water): 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (in. llg) 

Cr... ; ; 

I 

..•iji. 

K ' T 

r£^^..j=J2..£>S 

•zfr/is 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

/.: 

<( 

r . 

c 

C f 

AVERAGE 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

In.water 

...__0_.'.i?X-..' 

/., O 

„.&J^ 

QXZLL._ 

: J2/.J2l _ 

-O/JJLSL 

o,U9-

-JQL&JU 

0.5?, > 2 -

-.M 

-j?y 

.-OjmSLLm. 

o.u\ 

TEMPERATURE 

Ts 

d e fl- F 

1.0a ^. 

.I.OL2 

...lib. 

AJZ&. 

)CJb 

MM 

$f & L 

WLL 

ML 

iDti 

MX 

IQb 

IOG 

^ 
P.40 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

DATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE I I): 

STATIC PRESSURE, (in! wntoij: 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (in. My): 

VEl OCIIY I RAVERSE DAIA 

tLi&lXk^ U/3A^I tkl&tk.. 

Z-0j.2>.Q. 

iyyiM-.. 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

^ / 

Z 

3 

1 

l> 

i 

_..._S..-. 

In. 

y 

.? 

a 

_J2, 

AVERAGE 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

In.waler 

. 16 

*/7 

,(% 

ui 

..JJ... 

..,y.i_ 

jL. 

ny 

-+J3. 

..J3_._ 

-> /PTEMPERATURE 

Ts 

.-"7...fe 

7<*. 

7fe._ 

7; 

' < > 

J2-*: 

^ 

"V 

.3^. 

__^4. 

2£-

.1: 

.. . 7^ 

<4 V 

10-30 ^ 

7 ^ 

%\°l* 
P.41 

VELOCIIY TRAVERSE OATA 

CLIENT: p:^-v , . ,.-• 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: O-'..7- • 

DATE: p_ 7L 

RUN No: ~ " I 

OPERATORS: Z Z ': *" 1 

PITOT TUBE ID : '_ '_ 

STATIC PRESSURE, (in! water): 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (in. llg): 

<*> - Q.O'7\ 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

0 \ 

•v 

c 

.

rA. L 

_ 

v_ 

1 -. 

i . ' 

> 

c 

1 

' • / 

"\ 

1 

AVERAGE 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

fn.water 

fe<^Z (ll37 

Q.S03 

^ 
P.42 

VELOCIT Y T RAVERSE OAT A 

QftTf ? fun 

. JOG 2 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

OATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE ID: 

STATIC PRESSURE, (In. water): 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (in. llg): 

S-tun/iato^ 

/C/Vc ? • / 

JdrlbirM-yl ..._ _ 

Zb. ..jlox 

Z SMI 

?z\qiy 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

In.water 

TEMPERATURE 

Ts 

l2-',(< 

^ 
P.43 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

OATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE ID: 

STATIC PRESSURE, (in:"wator): 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (In. llg): 

VELOCITY TRAVERSE OATA 

_:. /odj. •-

it cC... 'J/.^7lSynhJ.C£T 

-/y-^y 

3-.,,..__ _ 

^k-Jb)75- - \}\ 

5& 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

S...L 

2 

...... j.. 4.._ 

.£_/. 

_a^ 

__3.t.. 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

In.waler 

__L_S _. 

\y...:... 

i-*> 

Q.,. 

TEMPERATURE 

Ts 

deg. F 

_£Z. 

-22 ^&J^ • I ]^7 

•13% 

AVERAGE l.6i qr ? i 

t\Z 
P.44 

VELOCIIY TRAVERSE OATA 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

DATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE ID : 

STATIC PRESSURE," (iti! water j : 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (In. llg) 

ICQ:T::/:JS. 

JCuR.M/ia —. 9-:M^~^.. 

TZiki 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

.s.../__ 

z 

'3 

JLL _ 

"r> 

y 

rx 

U 

AVERAGE 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

In.waler 

13 

*J.& 

.\hJi 

i§__ 

O^lY 

TEMPERATURE 

Ts 

15U 

^ 

90-

\-X\ Q\z 

ft 
P.45 

VELOCIl Y 1 RAVERSE OAT A 

.-..Ty--4>*<i.jyy.y. 

-.V... •' . :• Y> - •/ 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

OATE: 

RUN No:

 i"T

5; 

OPERATORS: r ;' ,;.. 

PITOT TUBE ID :

 :" " ^1 

STATIC PRESSURE, (in!"waier): 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (in. llg): 

i!V:/-/- O 

1-kL... 

y~s/ 

-.-jj±.jj:u^ 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

f 

6 

I 

f 

AVERAGE 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

In.water 

..G-J..I .., 

0J3r 

.bai 

0.3 W*? 

TEMPERATURE 

Ts 

deg. F 

2JJL 

'vhiuuxh ; ||.4<; 

^ \ 
PAS 

VELOCIIY TRAVERSE OATA 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

DATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE I D _ 

STATIC PRESSURE^ (iiirwator): 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (In. llg) 

Cimtr i ?<k. o Si&nd*' • ^-^ 

....... LO.O > .. ..... 

S <2.o rh SoftX u.. _ E> o.o±h r+*J 

..-..S=J--*S-£2 A _ 

J2- _ 

XdxJ HZ ."7 Z" 7ZZZ 

- O,- S9 -

•A' 
P.47 

VEl OCIIY TRAVERSE OATA 

CLIENT: fi,A.<\sf.tKo,.~: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: G'CX ;r "* 

DATE: " y .-,-:.:j 

RUN No: " ~ < 

OPERATORS: "" p'"- *. W" 

PITOT TUDE ID: " TM 

STATIC PRESSURE, (in! waieij: 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (in. llg): 

y^* do 

.r_S*_C23.— 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

•mi 

c 

D 

v/ 

N 

_ £ 

1 

c o 

-J 

L

! 

s 

J) 

0 

i 

3> 

6" 

AVERAGE 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

In.waler 

Qf.a> ... 

D7P . 

J^m 

y2.an.. 

&,A<L. 

-J&J2CL 

Asa. 

0r<% 

mCb^l 

J27j£-

.JiQjJlTL-

...ail.. 

_.._0,SB.. 

TEMPERATURE 

Ts 

deg. F 

aa 

az.. 

Z7Z 

u.i=_„ 

.L).^._ _ 

w 

IL 

m~-

iuJLLL 

11 

ILL 

il 1^ 

-lAJLzi-

..7Z_^_ 

.jJ-.ly 

112^ 

JlAr. 

/JJ~ 

Q*r*j e0.&0 

J\^ 

tkAjLHjJy'-

3-\ 

i I 

7^ 

xry 
P.48 

VELOCITY TRAVERSE OATA 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

DATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE ID : _ 

STATIC PRESSURE, (in;"wa(oij: 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (in. llg): 

^r/.J^r. $7.. -. 

./-AJ 

......-fcj^4 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

Sl 

9-

7 3 

_ 7 

a./ 

a 

...3 

AVERAGE 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

In.water 

M3b^. 

_._£! . 

_ 

_ ^c_ . 

TEMPERATURE 

Ts 

deg. F 

o£o-Z- V^Stg 

y 
P.49 

VELOCIIY TRAVERSE OATA 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

OATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE I D: 

STATIC PRESSURE, (in! watorj: 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (in. Hg): 

tirrrricfr/i. _^oid.^'-y. 

JUjJt OfmX.?J.u57JL 

...yLr/MzA-? -

—^- _-3 ^ 

-jC&m.^T 

JzjQSrul' 

iotk JmdJf Jl 

) - ^ 

H '«$ 
VEL OCI 1 Y T RAVERSE OATA 

P.50 

lis .-< '• yl'\ 

• •" . ** * 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

DATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PIFOTTUBEID: 

STATIC PRESSURE, (in-watorj: 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (in. Hg): 

rM';'.^' 

'•-I 

TZZMTZIZTI"' 

-Q^JO$7 

| TRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

8 

•M 

AVERAGE 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

in.waier 

...oes 

sAP3. 

Q,07... 

0- or 

_£..QZL. 

_i2z.Q£z 

D,.^-_._._. 

^.OJ S 

&ai 

^/^j > 

TEMPERATURE 

Ts 

deg. F 

-0 

£&> 

j£t ^ 

- ^ % 

Zi 
P.51 

CLIENT: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

DATE: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE ID : 

STATIC PRESSURE, (iiiMwaiorj: 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (in. Hg): 

VELOCIIY TRAVERSE DATA 

Oin nd./1('fin ^JiXrVfCc/J^ 

[OD Z. . „ 

5 o ^ "Tyyuy. &.ODJ^. •-

U ^ 

J-JOoTjJpJ'y 

~±L£l 

\ 

be 
P.52 

Cl TEN I: 

PROJECT No: 

LOCATION: 

DA1E: 

RUN No: 

OPERATORS: 

PITOT TUBE ID : 

STATIC PRESSURE, (in! waiorj: '"" ' 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (In. llg): 

VELOCIIY TRAVERSE OATA 

Omentum SiuM&/cyIOOL _ 

Ki.Qr.Hn TxpfOud BoD£r>^4-

-~Q.~iy~.giJ _ 

..._CDT / .sr:77:zzz 

.Zn*i£-

IRAVERSE 

POINT 

No. 

S 

1 

3 

•H 

t> 

u 

"7" 

§ X io... 

LU 

JZ. 

J2U _ 

Z_ 

AVERAGE 

VELOCITY 

DELTA P 

In.water 

e_ 

.rz-\ 

,21. 

2.4. 

"' Jb 

-ASL. 

-/s> 

JS.. 

^2. 

^ZSl 

= # . 

TEMPERATURE 

Ts 

d c »F 

^ u l /;/ o ptp. 

/.a* 

5/ 
P.53 

i - i ; 

ATTACHMENT 3 

QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS 

> 

r-i.. 
DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

INSTRUMENTATION CALIBRATION DATA 

P.54 

Client 

Location 

Parameter 

Sourcelncinerator Outlet 

Operator 

American Std. 

Salem, OH 

THCs 

WAS 

Project No. 

Test Date 

Instrument 

Response Time 

Range (ppm) 

1002 

09/16/97 

JUM VE7 

52 

100 

PRETEST CALIBRATION 

Standard 

Concentration 

(ppm) 

Nitrogen 

85.5 

24.4 

5.03 

24.4 

Sample 

via 

Instrument 

Instrument 

Instrument 

Instrument 

Sample Line 

Instrument 

Response 

0.0 

85.0 

24.5 

5.1 

24.3 

Recorder 

Response 

0.0 

85.5 

24.6 

5.1 

24.4 

Calibration 

Error 

% 

NA 

0.0 

0.2 

0.1 

0.0 

INSTRUMENT DRIFT CHECKS 

Run No. 1 

Cal. Gas 

Cone. 

Zero 

24.4 

Before Run 

Instrument 

0.9 

26.6 

Recorder 

0.9 

26.7 

After Run 

Instrument 

0.4 

25.0 

Recorder 

0.4 

25.1 

Drift 

% y/y-

-0.5 ' 

-1.6 

Run No. 

Cal. Gas 

Cone. 

Zero 

24.4 

2 

Before Run 

Instrument 

0.4 

25.0 

Recorder 

0.4 

25.1 

After Run 

Instrument 

0.3 

25.0 

Recorder0.3 -. 

25.1 

Drift 

% 7jy 

-0.1 

0.0 

Run No. 

Cal. Gas 

Cone. 

Zero 

24.4 

3 

Before Run 

Instrument 

0.3 

25.0 

Recorder 

0.3 

25.1 

After Run 

Instrument 

-0.2 

25.6 

Recorder 

-0.3 

25.7 

Drift 

%

 l? •.(>>>* 

-0.6 

0.6 

5'3 
DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TEST 

INSTRUMENTATION CALIBRATION DATA 

P.55 

Client American Std. 

Location Salem, OH 

Parameter THCs 

Source Incinerator Inlet 

Operator WAS 

Project No. 

Test Date 

Instrument 

Response Time 

Range (ppm) 

1002 

09/16/97 

JUM VE7 

48 sec. 

1000 

PRETEST CALIBRATION 

Standard 

Concentration 

(ppm) 

Nitrogen 

846 

494 

85.5 

494 

Sample 

via 

Instrument 

Instrument 

Instrument 

Instrument 

Sample Line 

Instrument 

Response 

0.0 

845.0 

500.0 

87.0 

503.0 

Recorder 

Response 

0.0 

846.0 

501.0 

88.0 

504.0 

Calibration 

Error 

% 

NA 

0.0 

0.7 

0.3 

1.0 

INSTRUMENT DRIFT CHECKS 

Run No. 1 

Cal. Gas 

Cone. 

Zero 

494 

Run No. 

Cal. Gas 

Cone. 

Zero 

494 

Run No. 

Cal. Gas 

Cone. 

Zero 

494 

Before Run 

Instrument 

0.0 

511.0, 

Recorder 

1.0 

512.0 

2 

Before Run 

Instrument 

1.0 

498.0 E 

Recorder 

1.0 

499.0 

3 

Before Run 

Instrument 

-0.1 

498.0 

Recorder 

-0.2 

499.0 

After Run 

Instrument 

1.0 

498.0 

Recorder 

1.0 

499.0 

After Run 

Instrument 

-0.1 

517.0 

Recorder * 

-0.2 

518.0 

After Run 

Instrument 

-2 

515 

Recorder 

-3 

515 

Drift 

% 

0.0 

-1.3 

' 

Drift 

% 

-0.1 

1.9 

Drift 

% 

-0.3 

1.6 
i-or lecnnicai inTormanon oaii 

1-800-752-1597 PRODUCTS X= i 

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. * 12722 S. Wentworth Avenue, Chicago, IL 60628 ISO CERTIFICATION: 9002 

CEFrriie)t!6WA^ 

PERFORMED ACCORDING TO EPA TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL FOR ASSAY AND CERTIFICATION OF GASEOUS CALIBRATION STANDARDS (PROCEDURE *G1j 

Customer : 

APCI- CP 

FREEPORT RD, ROUTE 2 8 

CREIGHTON PA 15030 -

Orde r No : 148-014213-0 7 

Batc h No : 861-3811 6 

PO: 

Release : 

Cylinde r No : SG9133459BAL 

B a r Cod e No : BXH313 

Cylinde r Pressure* : 200 0 psi g 

Certificatio n Date : 03/10/9 7 

Expiratio n Date : 03/10/0 0 

CERTIFIE D CONCENTRATIO N 

Component 

PROPANE 

Certifie d 

Concentratio n 

846 ±4.0 PPM 

REFERENC E STANDARD S 

Cylinde r 

Number 

SG9128533BAL 

Standard 

Type 

GHIS 

Standard 

Concentration 

1027 PPM 

ANALYTICA L INSTRUMENTATIO N 

Instrumen t 

Hake/Hodel 

Gow-Mac 750 

Seria l 

Number 

59405U 

Last 

Calibratio n 

03/05/9 7 

Measurement 

Principa l 

GC-FI0 

NITROGEN Balance Gas 

' ^ Notes 

* STANDARD SHOULD NOT BE USED BELOW 15 0 PSIG 

Analyst: Approved By: 

Richard Fry 

(16921) Pub. No. 32Q-9702 

O) 
i-or lecnnicai inTormauon oan 

1-800-752-1597 PRODUCTS 

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. * 12722 S. Wentworth Avenue, Chicago, IL 60628 ISO CERTIFICATION: 9002 

GERTIIilC^BiifflMlSiSlIlE 

PERFORMED ACCORDING TO EPA TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL FOR ASSAY AND CERTIFICATION OF GASEOUS CALIBRATION STANDARDS (PROCEDURE «G1; 

Customer: 

APCI- CP 

FREEPORT RD, ROUTE 28 

CREIGHTON PA 15030-

Order No: 148-014388-01 

Batch No: 861-27209 

PO: 

Release: 

Cylinder- No: 

Bar Code No: 

Cylinder Pressure*: 

Certification Date: 

Expiration Date: 

SG9162729BAL 

DDP901 

2000 psig 

08/31/95 

08/31/98 

CERTIFIE D CONCENTRATIO N 

Component 

PROPANE 

Cert i fie d 

Concentrat io n 

£9-4 *3. 0 PPM 

REFERENC E STANDARD S 

Cylinde r 

Number 

SG91?863SBAL 

Standard 

Type 

GHIS 

Standard 

Concentratio n 

503.9 PPM 

ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTATION 

Instrument 

Make/Model 

Gow-M3c 750 

Seria l 

Number 

59405U 

Last 

Calibratio n 

CS/IS/95 

Measurement 

Principa l 

GC FIO 

NITROGEN Balance Gas 

TT" * STANDARD SHOULD NOT BE USED BELOW 15 0 PSIG 

Notes: 

Analyst: 

James Laas 

Approved Bv; \LM^ %Xu^^/Lji 

Robert HcNear 

(16921) Pub. No. 320-9702 
P.58 

|H Scott Specialty Gases 

6141 EASTON ROAD. P O BOX 310. PLUMSTEADVILLE. PA 18949O310 (215)766-8861 FAX: (215) 76&O320 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS 

Customer 

Oplim.il Tivhnoloftios lm 

575 William Pill Way 

Pillsl-nirj'.h, PA 15238 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION 

Assay Laboratory 

Scotl Specially Gases, Inc.. 

6141 Easlon Road 

P.O. Box EMI) 

Plunislciuivillo, PA 18949-0310 

Purchase Order 532512 

Scott Project # 01-71905-001 

litis certification was performed according to EPA iraccability Protocol For Assay & Certification of Caseous Calibration Standards; 

1 Procedure «C7, Section Number 3.0.4; September, 7.W.L 

Cylinder Number ALM032640 Certification Date 10-05-95 Expiration Date 10-05-97 

Cylinder Pressure 21XX1 psig+ Previous Certification Dates None 

ANALYZED CYLINDER 

Components 

Propane 

Balance Gas: Nitrogen 

Certified Concentration 

24.4 ppm 

Analytical Uncertainty* 

± 1% NIST Traceable 

+ Do not use when cylinder is less than 150 psig. 

•Analytical uncertainly is inclusive of usual known error sources which al least includes reference standard error & precision of the measurement processes. 

REFERENCE STANDARD 

Type Expiration Date 

SRM1667B 11-15-97 

Cylinder Number 

CLMM5278 

Concentration 

47.3 ppm C3H« in N2 

INSTRUMENTATION 

Instrumenl/Model/Serial # 

C3H8: Varian/ VA3300/7945 

Last Dale Calibrated 

10-21-95 

Analytical Principle 

FID 

ANALYZER READINGS (Z=Zero Gas R=Reference Cas T=Test Gas r=Correlation Coefficient) 

Components First Triad Analysis 

Propane 

Second Triad Analysis Calibration Curve 

Special Notes: 

Dale: 10-05-95 Response Units: Area 

7.1=000000 Rl=510118 Tl=264368 

R2=510113 Z2=000000 T2=264055 

Z3=00O000 13=263560 R3=512152 

Avfj. Cone, of CusL Cyl. 24.4 ppm 

Concentraiion:3 

r=l .00000 

Constants: 

B=1.0172E-04 

D=0.0000£+00 

A+Bx+Cx2+Dx3+Ex4 

NTRM1668 

, A=-9.9237E-03 

C=0.00OOE+00 

E=0.0000£+00 

r-)J^ 

valyst James T. Kraus 

Jl 
For Technical Information Call 

1-800-752-1597 PRODUCTS 

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. * 12722 S. dentworth Avenue, Chicago, IL 60628 ISO CERTIFICATION: 9002 

liitilliMii^^ 

i-ERFGRMED ACCORDING TO EPA TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL FOR ASSAY AND CERTIFICATION OF GASEOUS CALIBRATION STANDARDS ..PROCEDURE -G 1 

Customer : 

AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. 

1020 2 STRANG ROAD 

LA PORTE TX 7757 1 

Orde r No : SRP-573952-0 5 

Batc h No: 861-3596 4 

PO: 

Release : 

Cylinde r No : SG9132935BAL 

B a r Code No : DDJ689 

Cylinde r Pressure* : 200 0 psi g 

Certificatio n Date : 12/04/9 6 

Expiratio n Date : 12/04/9 9 

* 0 

CERTIFIE D CONCENTRATIO N 

Component 

PROPANE 

Certifie d 

Concentratio n 

85.5 i0.5 6 PPM 

REFERENC E STANDARD S 

Cylinder 

Number 

SG9128479BAL 

Standard 

Type 

GMIS 

Standard 

Concentratio n 

100.7 PPM 

ANALYTICA L INSTRUMENTATIO N 

Instrument 

Make/Model 

Gow-Mac 750 

Seria l 

Number 

59405U 

Last 

Calibratio n 

11/12/96 

Measurement 

Principa l 

GC-FID 

NITROGEN Balance Gas 

* STANDARD SHOULD NOT BE USED BELOW 15 0 PSIG 

Notes: 

Analyst: Approved By: 

Richard Fry 

• it"!'.." I: Piih Mr.. 320 0702 

Ul 

co 
P.60 

SPECTRA GASES 

277 Colt St.- Itvinglon. NJ 07111 USA Tel.: (201) 372-2060 • (800) 932-0624 • Fax: 201) 372-6551 

Shipped From: 80 Industrial Drive • Alpha. N.J. 08865 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS EPA PROTOCOL MIXTURE 

PROCEDURE n: G1 

CUSTOMER: 

SGI ORDER # : 

ITEM# : 

P.O.# : 

Optimal Technologies 

126136 

1 

P43622 

CYLINDER # : SG91060348AL 

CYLINDER PRES; 1300 PSIG 

CGA OUTLET: 350 

CERTIFICATION DATE: 7/25/97 

EXPIRATION DATE: 7/25/2000 

CERTIFICATION HISTORY 

COMPONENT 

Propane 

DATE OF 

ASSAY 

7/25/97 

MEAN 

CONCENTRATION 

5.03 ppm 

CERTIFIED 

CONCENTRATION 

5.03 ppm 

ANALYTICAL 

ACCURACY 

+/-1% 

BALANCE 

REFERENCE STANDARDS 

Nitrogen 

COMPONENT 

Propane 

SRM/NTRM# 

SRM-2643A 

CYLINDER* 

SX20148 

CONCENTRATION 

99.1 ppm 

INSTRUMENTATION 

COMPONENT 

Propane 

MAKE/MODEL 

H. Packard-6690 

SERIAL # 

US00001434 

DETECTOR 

GC - FID 

CALIBRATION 

DATE(S) 

6/26/97 

THIS STANDARD WAS CERTIFIED ACCORDING TO THE EPA PROTOCOL PROCEDURES. 

DO NOT USE THIS STANDARD IF THE CYLINDER PRESSURE IS LESS THAN 160 PSIQ. 

ANALYST: yu <\_ DATE: 7/25/97 

TED NEEME 

7°i 
P.61 

•>0 (0 sc 100 no ; 

DRY BULB TEMPERATURE. °F 

F i y.i.» r e 08 . Pv/c h rome t r i c ch:»i l expressin g volu!:> 

GC 
P.62 

?ff'r 

?(& 

K^£<^^ J Tirxs-t^ <zi^y. 

2- FK)/ 

4 /*>o-

^ O ^ 5^/^ J f

/ y 

/ U^-(^<.^f- C/^L< ^ 

A 

SU &-. /ooz_ 

.Qtr^-iJ" =• ck-# B o-^voo ^*f^ 

m 

i t O 

JJjbJ erf-i^ 

\* -=o 

ltu/y\ i 

f**f9#*- U^ J/^ 

a? 

&**. kv T ef 

b A T &>- <-c ^ 5f«^ r $uJl e 

afV^i^orUr t oc*LV«V 

8: os 

e 

^•^i^^ ^ 

cw 

* 

tr 

- <r 
P.63 

: i 

^ 

'JyJ^i^^^C-A __JJodl 

W2. 

er<7 

Co? 

3LA 

ML 

P /& / c'-crV) t> u 

0-oo \ co^ 

5~>oo 

0.8 ? 

8-qc 

o-oU 

Rb z- (j^r) DU 

.1 ^' L / r 

Flbfc/. 

( (4S9 t>u 

69. <T 

0 -°"° O-O^ O -erpr

 ~ O. 

•T 

5^3 \ 5 ^ 

'o-ir 1 -

P.-ZU 

o -xT 

%1« 4 

?..'*/^ 

-ftl -\y tf 

o -OH 

3J$1§> 

Q'Olr 4-0.3 

2.CI. 

6'2^ 
7" 

P.64 

\ /OOX - n 

/oez ^ 1 

K U A S 

/0; z~ 

^'5r 

t0e2_-O3 -P I $'./<< y>/)'.ZL} 

f ©z. 

'

f

*«' f^C«k4M ^ 

/VVT 9 Q 

^ e>o3 

Zr.) 

O/o0> 

C4r\Cyir~y 

Q-Zt( 

6 9 

© 

< 

...j 

--* 

...J? 
P.65 

ATTACHMENT 4 

LABORATORY RESULTS 

(J\ 
P.66 

AIR QUALITY SERVICES, INC. 

4527 Clairton Boulevard 

Pittsburgh, PA 15236 

(412) 881-5630 

TABLE I 

ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FOR ACETONE/METHANOL AND METHANE CONTENT 

OPTIMAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

575 WILLIAM PITT WAY 

PITTSBURGH, PA 15238 

PURCHASE ORDER #19077 

SAMPLES RECEIVED: SEPTEMBER 17, 1997 

OPTIMAL 

SAMPLE 

ID 

=========== 

I-l 

9-16-97 

1025 

1-2 

9-16-97 

1155 

0-1 

9-16-97 

1035 

0-2 

9-16-97 

1154 

AQS 

LABORATORY 

NUMBER 

================== 

AQS-76430 

AQS-76431 

AQS-76432 

AQS-76433 

ACETONE 

PPM 

— — — — =;:=: = = = = :: 

15.6 

3.1 

4.0 

• 

4.6 

METHANOL 

PPM 

============ 

<0.1 

<0.1 

<0.1 

<0.1 

METHANE 

PPM 

3.5 

1.5 

2.7 

3.1 

THE SAMPLES WERE ANALYZED BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY USING A FLAME 

IONIZATION DETECTOR. 

-•4ry-7,;:;/ />--Af-.ih/r 

AIR QUALITY SERVICES, INC, 

JOB 5769 

REPORTED: SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 

fr > 
P.67 

blectro-Anaiyticai 

Group 

Environmental Consultants • Certified laboratories 

Ie$fr Results bv Sample 

iample: 01A 

Aethano 

tee tone 

> tyrene 

inknowns* 

•ample: 02A 

tethane 

icetone 

etrahydrofuran 

ityrone 

Inknowns* 

10Q2-O3 Outlet Stream 

Rejufts 

2.8 

1.8 

53 

2.9 

Reporting 

limit 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1002-13 Inlet Stream 

Results 

26 

1.6 

1.1 

78 

32 

Reporting 

Limit 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

Units 

ppm as propane 

ppm as propane 

ppm as propane 

ppm as propane 

Units 

ppm as propane 

ppm as propane 

ppm as propane 

ppm as propane 

ppm as propane 

Analyzed 

9/19/97 

9/19/67 

9/19/97 

9/19/97 

Analyzed 

9/19/97 

9/19/97 

9/19/97 

9/19/97 

9/19/97 

lotdir: 

Eesufts ere reported "as propane" 

amples analyzed by GC/FID, confirmed by GC/MS 

Unknown peaks probable Identification as Isomers of divinylbenzene 

3o/<*7 UM AJjCLA/* @ ^^iAX^C-C^^v S^lxJ. Lys* 

i^iit.H^u^/A c*, h©-*^<_ 

l/IA^ r^e^A< 8-M 

/^QJt^i^WjC X~ [ 

9.1 

^ 0 

fcO 
American Staiidard Inc. "'" "' •- K-VK-.I-.-J !•.**» 

U.S. Plumbing Products 

60S Sou * EJIswonb Avenue 

S<xlern OH 44460 

Telephone 216 332-S954 

•J'O.ly ?., 3.95*C> 

Bruce Weinberg 

Performance* Tea Liuy S«clivii 

Division of Air PoUution Control 

Ohio EPA 

Dear Mr. Weinberg: 

In a meeting with Karold Stiohrocy?r st MCVAA today, we discussed 

d:i f ferem: options for deteminii-.g capture efficiency for sever;-1 air 

emissions sources st this facility. Wv buv© reviewed Methods <04 

through 204F in U.S. EPA's January 199S Guidance Document. Mr. 

Strehnoyer suggested that we contact: yoii .if we> wanted to propo;* «•> an 

alternative method for determining capture efficiency. 

There are -1 sources for which w*a must determine a capture efficiency. 

Two of these sources do hot meet the criteria for a permanent total 

enclosure defined by Method 204. Cue source is a PeVilbiss paint spray 

booth recently i.o stalled her-,*. This booth is a totally enclosed tunnel 

except for a 4ft. by 8ft. conveyor opening at each end to ^Ho v i.ha 

passage of products. The other source is a low temperature cu;ing oven 

which is. also a tunnel with a 4ft. by 1 -6ft. opening at each ene (seo 

attached drawings). 

With regard to the curing oven, 1 was told by a consultant thai it would 

not be necessary to cos" capture efriciency ir we could show ar inward 

movement of air at each end. 1 would like to verify if thia ii true. 

The Deviibiss -spray booth was designed »o achieve 100% capture 

erriciency. It meets all cie criteria foi -a fe±-M(dii««t tvlol wxlysw e 

except for one. The natural draft openings whero the products enter and 

exit are too close to the VOC-smitting ppints. 1 om proposing to cover 

che area between the e«-it end of the spray booth and the entrat.ee end ot 

r.he cure over, with a permanent enclosure. At tho on trance ond vC tho 

spray booth, 1 am proposing to add an automatic door that open! when the 

conveyor belt starts advancing th« product into tho booth then closes 

when the conveyor belt stops. This would create a very small i aturul 

draft op«nin<3 -at Lh* -?ni.r<(rrt of the hooi-h nnring rh<? spray operation. 

With these modifications, can J assume J00% capture cCf.ioicncy for these 

two souccos'? 

T must have those sources tested by August 15. Therefore, I mist file 

an Intent to Test form by July 3 5. Jf you aro available, I wot Id like 

to call you tomorrow (Wednesday) to discuss this proposal. Yoi. may 

contact me by phone at (330) 337-2224 or fax at (330) 337-2203. 

,4frrMawSfarmi<ktmi 

(rl 

Sincerely, 

QVCMA-A GoOf 
P.69 

£3 i_ l 

< 

O 

(/• ) 

y 

tfr 

E3 

.1 

Og 

• 6 * 
P.70 

4