alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.28    
    


Summary of Named Executive Officers Salaries for 2006  



        On February 21, 2006, the Board of Directors of The Allstate Corporation, upon recommendation from the Compensation and Succession Committee of the Board
of Directors, approved the following 2006 annual base salaries: Edward M. Liddy, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, $1,225,000; Danny L. Hale, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, $587,004;
Eric A. Simonson, President, Allstate Investments, LLC, $580,008; Casey J. Sylla, President, Allstate Financial, $610,008; and Thomas J. Wilson, II, President and Chief Operating Officer, $835,008.
These salaries are effective as of April 1, 2006 and may be changed at any time at the discretion of the Board. These five executives include the chief executive officer and the other four most
highly compensated executive officers based on 2005 annual base salaries and annual bonuses with respect to 2005 expected to be approved by the Committee in March. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.28
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Western District of Texas

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

6:20-cv-00571-ADA

GOOGLE LLC,

Google LLC

c/o Corporation Service Company

211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620

Austin, TX 78701-3218

James L. Etheridge

Etheridge Law Group, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120• 324

Southlake, TX 76092

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 6 Filed 06/30/20 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

6:20-cv-00571-ADA

0.00

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 6 Filed 06/30/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 145 (Monday, July 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 45515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18152]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Availability of the Fiscal Year 2012 Inventory of Contracts for 
Services

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD announces the availability of the Inventory of Contracts 
for Services for Fiscal Year 2012 pursuant to section 2330a of title 
10, United States Code. Inventory is available to the public.

DATES: Comments should be submitted by August 16, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to: Office of the Director, Defense 
Procurement and Acquisition Policy, ATTN: OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/CPIC, 3060 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Comments also may be 
submitted by email to Jeffrey.Grover@osd.mil

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Grover, telephone 703-697-9352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 2330a of title 10 
United States Code, the Office of the Deputy Director, Defense 
Procurement and Acquisition Policy, Contract Policy and International 
Contracting (DPAP/CPIC) will make available to the public the annual 
inventory of contracts for services. The inventory is posted to the 
Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy Web site at: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/cpic/cp/acquisition_of_services_policy.html

Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2013-18152 Filed 7-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, SPORES.                    

*Date:*                         October 25-27, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8 AM to 6 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn—Georgetown, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20007.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Brian E. Wojcik, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8019, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/402-2785.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 12, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-26854  Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### THOMPSON v. STATE

No. 22429.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 10, 1943.

Tom Davis, of Haskell, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a fine of $25 upon conviction of a charge of failing to stop and render aid.

The case is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. The procedure appears to be regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
**Exhibit99.10**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Canadian SuperiorEnergy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the fiscal year ended December31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory S. Noval, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 16, 2007
|        | By:    | /s/ GREGORY S.  NOVAL |                    |
|--------|--------|-----------------------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Name:                 | Gregory S. Noval        |
|   |   | Title:                | Chief Executive Officer |
|        |        |                       |                         |  |

 

----
# Iris Oifigiúil C NaN/27 E

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | Eagrán Speisialta (
  1
  ) |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 5827 Eanáir 2015 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

Eagrán Speisialta (
  1
  )

1

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

5827 Eanáir 2015

---

| | Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Ceartúcháin |
| 2015/C /01 | Ceartúchán ar an nGlao ar léiriú spéise – Riarthóirí taighde – gníomhairí conarthacha (grúpa feidhmeanna IV) i réimse an taighde pharlaimintigh — (IO C 55 A, 26.2.2014 ) | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

Ceartúcháin

2015/C /01

Ceartúchán ar an nGlao ar léiriú spéise – Riarthóirí taighde – gníomhairí conarthacha (grúpa feidhmeanna IV) i réimse an taighde pharlaimintigh — (IO C 55 A, 26.2.2014 )

(IO C 55 A, 26.2.2014 )

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Faoin tagairt C 27 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh. |

---

(1)   Faoin tagairt C 27 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh.

1

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

Ceartúcháin

| 27.1.2015 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | 1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2015

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

1

---

Ceartúchán ar an nGlao ar léiriú spéise – Riarthóirí taighde – gníomhairí conarthacha (grúpa feidhmeanna IV) i réimse an taighde pharlaimintigh

(Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
  C 55 A an 26 Feabhra 2014
  )

Leathanach 4, Teideal VIII, an abairt deiridh:

In ionad:

“Is i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3a, Airteagal 84 agus Airteagal 85 de CFSE a tharraingeofar suas an conradh.”,

Léitear:

“Is i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 3b, Airteagal 84 agus Airteagal 88 CFSE a tharraingeofar suas an conradh.”.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements as reported on Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,504,096
<SECURITIES>                                10,533,383
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,674,418
<PP&E>                                         264,024
<DEPRECIATION>                               (187,898)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,523,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,528,859
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        271
<COMMON>                                       130,269
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,393,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,523,773
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,898,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (251,050)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,647,905)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,647,905)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,647,905)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**
CERTIFICATION
I, Charles P. Huffman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of EnergySouth, Inc.(the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation;and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 c) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably which are likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  d) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 17, 2004 /s/ Charles P. Huffman   Charles P. Huffman
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 28, 2011 

h1219 

Order 

 

December 28, 2011 

143765 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143765 

 COA: 305049 

REGINALD DEMARCUS WILLIAMS, Saginaw CC: 05-026525-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 

____________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 22, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. A-1-CA-36580

5 MARIO MATA ACOSTA,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY

8 Gary L. Clingman, District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General

10 Santa Fe, NM

11 for Appellee

12 Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender

13 Nina Lalevic, Assistant Public Defender

14 Santa Fe, NM

15 for Appellant

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 VIGIL, Judge.

18 {1} Defendant Mario Mata Acosta appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, of

19 the unlawful taking of a motor vehicle, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-16D-
2

1 1(A)(1) (2009). In this Court’s notice of proposed disposition, we proposed to

2 summarily affirm. Defendant filed a memorandum in opposition (MIO), which we

3 have duly considered. Remaining unpersuaded, we affirm.

4 {2} Defendant continues to argue that his statement should have been suppressed

5 as it was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. [MIO 2] However, Defendant has

6 not asserted any new facts or presented any authority or arguments to persuade this

7 Court that our notice of proposed disposition was erroneous. [See MIO 2-5; see also

8 MIO 4 n.1] See Hennessy v. Duryea, 1998-NMCA-036, ¶ 24, 124 N.M. 754, 955 P.2d

9 683 (“Our courts have repeatedly held that, in summary calendar cases, the burden is

10 on the party opposing the proposed disposition to clearly point out errors in fact or

11 law.”); State v. Mondragon, 1988-NMCA-027, ¶ 10, 107 N.M. 421, 759 P.2d 1003

12 (stating that a party responding to a summary calendar notice must come forward and

13 specifically point out errors of law and fact, and the repetition of earlier arguments

14 does not fulfill this requirement), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in

15 State v. Harris, 2013-NMCA-031, ¶ 3, 297 P.3d 374. We therefore refer Defendant

16 to our analysis in our notice of proposed disposition.

17 {3} Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition and

18 herein, we affirm Defendant’s conviction.

19 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED.
3

1 ____________________________________

2 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

3 WE CONCUR:

4 ___________________________

5 EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge

6 ___________________________

7 DANIEL J. GALLEGOS, Judge
#### CHAMBERS v. STATE.

No. 23346.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 8, 1946.

Rehearing Denied June 12, 1946.

*775Wright Stubbs, of Austin, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of misdemeanor theft, and by a jury given a sentence of six months in jail.

There is neither a statement of facts nor any bills of exceptions found in the record.

Appellant urges in a brief filed herein that fundamental error is shown by the record in that the complaint which initiates this prosecution is sworn to before an officer who does not exist, and therefore is in fact no complaint such as is contemplated by law.

The jurat attached to such complaint shows that an affidavit was made by F. L. Estepp before Perry L. Jones, *Assistant*County Attorney, Travis County, Texas, on August 13, 1945.

There appears in the transcript furnished us herein a certified copy of the bond of Perry L. Jones as County Attorney of Travis County, Texas, and his oath of office, both executed on January 1, 1945, showing that Perry L. Jones took the oath of office as County Attorney of Travis County, Texas, on January 1, 1945, and again a statement of the County Clerk of Travis County that the records of the County Clerk do not show the appointment of any assistants by said Perry L. Jones.

These two statements from the County Clerk being shown to have been made at the request of the defendant (appellant herein), but no file mark appearing thereon; they have no place in the transcript; they are ex parte matters, not offered in proof at the trial, nor on the motion for a new trial, and should not have been included in the transcript. They have neither been filed nor introduced upon the trial nor disposition of this case, and we cannot consider such as a part of this record.

These matters do not appear to have been called to the attention of the trial court, nor the opposing counsel, but appear to have been brought here in this court without notice or reason. They should not have been incorporated in the transcript.

The proceedings given consideration herein appear to be regular, and with nothing further properly presented for review, the judgment is affirmed.