alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.18(3)

                               Standard Chartered

                                THE MOCATTA GROUP

                                                              November 3, 1997

Advanced Metallurgy, Inc.
Murray Corporate Park
1003 Corporate Drive
Export, PA  15362
Attention:  Vice President of Purchasing and Distribution

      RE:   Silver Lease Agreement dated April 9, 1996 (as last amended
            February 14, 1997)

Gentlemen:

Reference is made to the above Silver Lease Agreement between Standard Chartered
Bank, Mocatta Bullion - New York and Advanced Metallurgy, Inc.

Please be advised that we have agreed to make the following amendment to the
above Silver Lease Agreement as follows:

Paragraph 2. NATURE OF TRANSACTIONS change "two million (2,000,000)" to "two
million six hundred thousand (2,600,000)"

All other terms and conditions remain intact.

<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.18(3)

Please return a signed copy of this letter to us at the address shown below to
indicate your agreement to the above amendment.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    STANARD CHATERED BANK,
                                    MOCATTA BULLION - NEW YORK


                                    By:  /s/ Timothy P. Dinneny
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Timothy P. Dinneny
                                    Title: Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/ Randy M. Weinerman
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                    Name: Randy M. Weinerman
                                    Title: Vice President

AGREED:

ADVANCED METALLURGY, INC.


By:   /s/ Raymond J. Matsey
   -------------------------------
Name:  Raymond J. Matsey
Title: Material Control Manager
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

      ( print page 61367)    

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

# DATE:

Weeks of October 16, 23, 30, November 6, 13, and 20, 2000.

# PLACE:

Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

# STATUS:

Public and Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

## Week of October 16

### Tuesday, October 17

11:25 a.m.

Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (If needed)

## Week of October 23—Tentative

### Monday, October 23

1:55 p.m.

Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (If needed)

## Week of October 30—Tentative

There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of October 30.

## Week of November 6—Tentative

There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of November 6.

## Week of November 13—Tentative

### Friday, November 17

9:25 a.m.

Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (If needed)

9:30 a.m.

Briefing on Risk-Informed Regulation Implementation Plan (Public Meeting) (Contact: Tom King, 301-415-5790)

                    This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address:                     *www.nrc.gov/​live.html.*

## Week of November 20—Tentative

There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of November 20.

The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)—(301) 415-1292. 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Bill Hill (301) 415-1661.

The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet at: http://www.nrc.gov/​SECY/​smj/​schedule.htm.

This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, Washington, DC 20555 (301-415-1661). In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to wmh@nrc.gov or dkw@nrc.gov.

Dated: October 13, 2000.

William M. Hill, Jr., 

Secy Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26783 Filed 10-13-00; 3:04 p.m.]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
Exhibit ‘M’

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 110-13 Filed 10/14/22 Page 1 of 3
GUERRA 000953

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 110-13 Filed 10/14/22 Page 2 of 3
GUERRA 000954

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 110-13 Filed 10/14/22 Page 3 of 3
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA
- 2010
- 127 6 SNPRM **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010
-NM
- 09 2
- AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.
Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA
- IR
- M
- 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

**For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:

**ASE Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
| (1)   | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-127966), pertaining to the 2002 Stock Plan, 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, and 2005 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan of Hoku Scientific, Inc.; |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | Registration Statement (Form S-8 333-144465), pertaining to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2005 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan of Hoku Scientific, Inc.; |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (3)   | Registration Statement (Form S-8 333-151895), pertaining to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2005 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan of Hoku Scientific, Inc.; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (4)   | Registration Statement (Form S-8 333-161225), pertaining to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2005 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan of Hoku Scientific, Inc. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5496 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5496

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to make a 
 technical correction relating to sanitary towels (pads) and tampons, 
       diapers and diaper liners for babies and similar articles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mrs. Schmidt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to make a 
 technical correction relating to sanitary towels (pads) and tampons, 
       diapers and diaper liners for babies and similar articles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SANITARY TOWELS (PADS) AND TAMPONS, DIAPERS AND DIAPER 
              LINERS FOR BABIES AND SIMILAR ARTICLES.

    (a) Technical Correction.--Heading 9619.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking subheadings 
9619.00.05 through 9619.00.90 and inserting the following new 
subheadings, with the article descriptions for subheadings 9619.00.10 
and 9619.00.20 having the same degree of indentation as the article 
description for subheading 9617.00.60:

``            9619.00.10   Diapers of cotton, other than           9.3%   Free (BH, CA, CL, IL,          90%
                            knitted or crocheted.............              JO, MA, MX, OM, P, PE,
                                                                           SG) 3% (AU)
              9619.00.20   Other.............................      Free   ........................       35%  ''
                                                                                                               .

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### HARRISON v. STATE.

No. 22344.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 6, 1943.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 17, 1943.

Eugene N. Catlett, of McAllen, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction under Art. 63, P.C., commonly known as the habitual criminal statute. The punishment affixed is life imprisonment in the penitentiary.

Said Article reads as follows: “Whoever shall have been three times convicted of a felony less than capital shall on such third conviction be imprisoned for life in the penitentiary.”

The two previous convictions relied upon in the instant case were alleged to have occurred in 1932 and 1935, respectively. With reference to the second conviction, the indictment fails to allege that the offense for which the appellant was then convicted was committed subsequent to the conviction in 1932, or the first conviction.

For the State to invoke the provisions of Art. 63, P.C., it is necessary that each succeeding conviction be subsequent to the previous conviction, both in point of time of the commission of the offense as well as the conviction therefor. The indictment must so allege. Ellis v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 346, 115 S.W.2d 660; Childress v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 504, 116 S.W.2d 396; Gammill v. State, 135 Tex. Cr.R. 52,117 S.W.2d 790; Mullins v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 261, 144 S.W.2d 565; Square v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 493, 154 S.W.2d 852.

An approved form of indictment covering prosecutions under Art. 63, P.C., will be found in the Childress case.

The indictment being insufficient to support a conviction as an habitual criminal, appellant’s objection to the submission thereof to the jury should have been sustained.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The State filed a motion for rehearing in this case in which the contention is made that it is not necessary to allege that one of the two prior offenses was committed after the conviction in the other in order to comply with Article 63 of the Penal Code. This is a contention that the court has been in error in all of the cases cited in the original opinion. We can not sustain the contention.

In view of the status of this case in which we find an indictment with twenty-seven counts, it is considered appropriate to say that the indictment is without fault *244in alleging the offense for which the party was tried >and also alleging one prior conviction for a similar offense. Trial may be had under it and proof admitted of a former conviction for the purpose of enhancing the penalty but it will not sustain a life sentence.

The Staté’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
[LETTERHEAD
      OF STAF*TEK]








**PROMISSORY
      NOTE**


TO


MRS.
      PHYLLIS L. BELL







$35,000.00
            April
                1,
                2005





For
      value
      received, STAF*TEK SERVICES, INC., of Tulsa, Oklahoma, (herein referred to
      as
‘maker’) promises to pay to the order of PHYLLIS L. BELL, (herein referred to as
‘payee’) on or before April 8, 2005 the principal sum of Thirty Five Thousand
      and No/100 Dollars ($35,000.00) plus $125.00.





Payment
      of this note shall be as follows: One lump sum payment of $35,000.00 plus
      $125.00 interest.





Maker
      may
      prepay this note in whole or in part without penalty or surcharge at any time
      prior to the maturity date.





The
      maker
      hereby severally waives presentment for payment, notice of nonpayment, protest
      and notice to protest, and aggress that extensions of the time for payment
      may
      be granted without notice. In case of legal proceedings to collect this note,
      maker agrees to pay all court costs including reasonable attorneys’ fees to
      payee as prevailing parties in the suit.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is signed the 1 st day of
      April, 2005.







/s/
              Shelia Hobens
            
            /s/
              John H. SimmonsShelia Hobens
            
            John H. Simmons, President,
              C.E.O.Staf*Tek Services, Inc.4870 S. Lewis St., Ste. 250Tulsa,
                Oklahoma 74105
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00576-CR

Thomas Spruill, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-10-207164, THE HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Thomas Spruill seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for forgery. 

See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 32.21 (West 2011). The trial court has certified that: (1) this is a plea

bargain case and Spruill has no right of appeal, and (2) Spruill waived the right of appeal. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton, and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: October 28, 2011

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

I, Gilad Gat, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of GSV, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [intentionally omitted];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and to the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2005


                                                /s/ Gilad Gat
                                                -------------------------------
                                                    Gilad Gat
                                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.A****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ending March 31, 2006, of Tennessee GasPipeline Company (the “Company”) as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Stephen C. Beasley, Chairman of the Boardand President,certify (i) that the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ Stephen C. Beasley           Stephen C. Beasley *Chairman of the Board and President* *(Principal Executive Officer)*       May 5, 2006A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Tennessee Gas PipelineCompany and will be retained by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
Exhibit 10.34
​
AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Amendment To Executive Employment Agreement (“Amendment”), effective June 30, 2021, hereby amends the Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated July 1, 2010, as amended to date, between Reprints Desk, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Research Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Research Solutions”), and Marc Nissan (“Executive”).
WHEREAS, the parties have complied with the terms of the Agreement until the date hereof; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the terms of the Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, for the mutual promises and other consideration described herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.Section 1(d) Term is amended as follows:
Term. The term of employment of Executive by the Company pursuant to this Employment Agreement shall be for the period commencing on the Commencement Date and ending on June 30, 2022, or such earlier date that Employee’s employment is terminated in accordance with the provisions of this Employment Agreement.
Except as expressly amended or modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved and shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between this Amendment and the Agreement, this Amendment shall govern.
This Amendment and all acts and transactions pursuant hereto and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed, construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law.
This Amendment may be executed and delivered by facsimile signature and in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
​
[Signature Page Follows]



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.
​
REPRINTS DESK, INC.:

By:​ ​
Name and Title:  Alan Urban, CFO
​
​
RESEARCH SOLUTIONS, INC.:

By:​ ​
Name and Title:  Alan Urban, CFO
​
EXECUTIVE:
​
​
By:​ ​
Name:  Marc Nissan