alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62343-62344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26685]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP00-634-000 and CP97-193-004]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

October 12, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Transcontinental Gas Pipe 
Line Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets 
listed on Appendix A to the filing, with an effective date of November 
1, 2000.
    Trancso states that the filing is being filed to adjust the initial 
reservation rate surcharge authorized by the Commission's Preliminary 
Determination on Non-Environmental Issues'' issued May 30, 1997 in 
Docket No. CP97-193-000. The May 30 Order and Exhibit P to the 
application required Transco to file to adjust the surcharge effective 
no later than three years from the date of the last adjustment, to 
reflect changes in the reserve for depreciation, deferred income taxes, 
associated state and federal income taxes, and firm transportation 
billing determinants under the firm transportation service agreements 
between Transco and Piedmont, if Transco has not placed into effect a 
general change in system rates pursuant to a rate proceeding under the 
NGA within any three-year period during the term of the surcharge. 
Therefore in order to comply with the approved reservation rate 
surcharge methodology, Transco states that it is including in the 
filing an adjustment to the surcharge, as discussed above, to be 
effective November 1, 2000.
    Transco states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each 
of its

[[Page 62344]]

SouthCoast customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26685 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001051556
<NAME>                        ViaGrafix Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         10,046
<SECURITIES>                                   3,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,861
<ALLOWANCES>                                   148
<INVENTORY>                                    1,909
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,448
<PP&E>                                         4,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,316
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 25,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,382
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       59
<OTHER-SE>                                     22,834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   25,216
<SALES>                                        18,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,285
<CGS>                                          4,545
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             54
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,601
<INCOME-TAX>                                   354
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,246
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .21
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE J. CREW
GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME FROM THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                             
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         9,643
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  156,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             223,216
<PP&E>                                       184,327
<DEPRECIATION>                                64,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               358,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        115,882
<BONDS>                                      282,695
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        150,548
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      70,380
<OTHER-SE>                                 (306,153)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (235,773)
<SALES>                                      816,221
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             824,258
<CGS>                                        460,592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                818,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            39,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (23,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   8,162
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           15,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  15,380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0 
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.A****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ending September 30, 2005, of Tennessee GasPipeline Company (the “Company”) as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Stephen C. Beasley, President,certify (i) that the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ Stephen C. Beasley           Stephen C. Beasley *Chairman of the Board and President* *(Principal Executive Officer)*      November 4, 2005A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Tennessee Gas PipelineCompany and will be retained by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2015

- 8131

Directorate Identifier: 2015NM073AD

737

- 57

- 1296, R1

--- 09/26/2012

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/ 05/2008
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2628 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2628

 To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to United States 
            Route 78 in Mississippi, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2013

Mr. Nunnelee (for himself, Mr. Harper, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, and 
 Mr. Palazzo) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to United States 
            Route 78 in Mississippi, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNITED STATES ROUTE 78 IN MISSISSIPPI.

    Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(j) United States Route 78 in Mississippi.--If any segment of 
United States Route 78 in Mississippi is designated as part of the 
Interstate System, no limit established under this section may apply to 
that segment with respect to the operation of any vehicle that could 
have legally operated on that segment before such designation.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### FOSTER v. BUCHANNAN.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 12, 1952.

*378Robert D. Foster, pro se.

W. Owen Keller, Frankfort, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, serving a sentence on a charge of forgery, is seeking to have this court hold that he is illegally confined in the Eddyville penitentiary. He proceeds in his proper person, but the record on which he submits his cause is neither proper in form nor sufficient in substance. The filing consists of a copy of a petition which he says was filed in the circuit court making application for a writ of habeas corpus. It fails to bear indorsement showing it was there filed. There is also an exhibit which evidences no filing except with the clerk of this court. There is no copy of a judgment disposing of his application, nor a transcript of evidence, or a recital thereof, if any was presented to the trial court. There is no sufficient notice of appeal.

Section 429-1, Criminal Code of Practice, provides that a party to a habeas corpus proceeding may appeal by filing with the clerk of -the Court of Appeals the original record and transcript of evidence, with timely notice of appeal served on the other parties. We have consistently held that where there is failure of compliance with the Code provisions, section 429-1 this court is without jurisdiction. Gulley v. Whaley, 314 Ky. 99, 234 S.W.2d 499; Wyatt v. Goodlett, 311 Ky. 583, 227 S.W.2d 406.

The papers and documents presented to us by petitioner constitute nothing more than an original application for a writ of habeas corpus. This court is not vested by law with such jurisdiction. Shepherd v. Rich, 214 Ky. 684, 283 S.W.2d 1006.

Under authority of the cases above cited the action is dismissed.
#### TIPPITT v. STATE.

No. 22306.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 2, 1942.

W. E. Martin, of Abilene, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Possessing beer in a dry area for the purpose of sale is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $125.

Peace officers, upon searching appellant’s home, situated in a dry area, found therein seven cases of beer. To the officers the appellant admitted the ownership of the beer.

The appellant did not testify as a witness in her own behalf, nor did she offer any affirmative defense.

The facts are sufficient to show appellant’s guilt.

The sole question presented for review is the sufficiency of the search warrant to authorize the search. The ground of objection is that the search warrant did not name or describe the appellant as the owner or occupant of the premises to be searched.

The search warrant described the premises to be searched as *“A*certain private dwelling, located in Taylor County, Texas, described as (a) 1101 Plum Street, Abilene, Texas, and being the premises of and occupied by persons whose names and descriptions are unknown to affiants * * Such a description was sufficient. Rathert v. State, 126 Tex.Cr.R. 484, 72 S.W.2d 276, and authorities there cited. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court ©f Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 2:58 PM

To: 'crothwell76@hotmail.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha (FAA); Cooper, Thuy (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information: Skyview Media Productions, LLC

January 21, 2015 

Mr. Charles Rothwell 

Skyview Media Productions, LLC 

11100 Shirley Lane 

North Fort Myers, FL 33917 

Dear Mr. Rothwell: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAAFAA-2014-0837). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process 

your petition. 

 Your petition references the materials listed below, however the materials were not submitted for the 

record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials: 

o Operator’s Manual 

o Operator’s Checklist 

o Aircraft Manual or URL link to aircraft manual 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to nia.daniels@faa.gov. If 

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by February 

5, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-7626. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (115)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,906
<PP&E>                                           9,871
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,598)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,546
<BONDS>                                          1,610
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,842
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,638
<SALES>                                         16,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,010
<CGS>                                           11,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    44
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (397)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (723)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (724)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (724)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sequa Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth J. Binder, Senior Vice President, Finance (acting chief financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Kenneth J. Binder

Kenneth J. Binder

Senior Vice President, Finance

(acting chief financial officer)





Dated:  November 7, 2006
#### Ex parte ALONZO.

No. 24025.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 25, 1948.

Bob Huff and Mack Wassell, both of Lamesa, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s A tty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant is under indictment for murder. Upon his application, bail was fixed by the judge at $10,000. Being unable to make such bond, the order was amended, fixing bail at the sum of $6,000. The appeal is from this order.

Since appellant’s right to bail has been recognized, that question is not before us. The sole question, then, relates to the amount of bail.

It affirmatively appears that after bail ad been fixed at the sum of $10,000 appel-nt obtained twenty-nine signers as sureties *j*that bond. The sheriff, however, would not approve that bond, deeming the sureties insufficient. We find nothing in this record showing what effort appellant has put forth to make the $6,000 bond. There is no showing that the sureties upon the $10,000 bond would not be acceptable for the $6,000 bond.

Before seeking a reduction of bail, an accused is under the burden of showing that he cannot make the bail fixed. Art. 281, C.C.P., and authorities listed under note 3 thereof; Ex parte Burleson, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 75, 109 S.W.2d 200; Ex parte Cascio, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 288, 144 S.W.2d 886; Ex parte Crenshaw, Tex.Cr.App., 200 S.W. 2d 826.

If appellant is unable to make the $6,000 bail, he should apply to the trial judge for a further reduction.

As the record is here presented, we are unable to say that the trial judge abused his discretion in fixing bail for the sum of $6,000.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRUCE ALLEN HASKINS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 430 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRUCE ALLEN HASKINS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 431 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
^l^^-t5^jS»c»^X<-» , C V 

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 

^OT- OST- QOO^-O-^II 

June 18, 2010 - -c;5 

t o 

Dennis DeVany 

Aviation & International Affairs 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Dennis: 

On behalf of the Paducah Area Chamber of Commerce, thank you for meeting with our 

business and community leaders in Washington D. C, on June 15-16, 2010. 

The Paducah, McCracken County, and Jackson Purchase Region strive to work together 

as a team. We are very proud of our regional cooperation and ask for your support of our 

priority projects (lists attached). 

If the Paducah Chamber can ever be of assistance to you, please feel free to contact me 

(270) 443-1746 or espalding@paducahchamber.org. 

Sincerely, 

^i^U^u 

Elaine Spalding 

President 

JEAnUCAU 401 KENTUCKY AVENUE P.O. BOX 810 • PADUCAH, KENTUCKY 42002-0810 

"A^^^^'AWTR''"" 270.443.1746 • FAX 270.442.9152 • info@paducahchamber.org • www.paducahchamber.org ^ - UNBRI UDLE i D SPIRIT 
Paducah/McCracken County, Kentucky 

2010 Agenda: Energy & the Environment 

Federal Priorities 

I. Support Nuclear Energy & Re-Industrialization of PGDP Site 

II. Public Health & Safety 

a. Paducah Flood Protection System Repairs 

b. DOE Cleanup Funds 

c. Disaster and Emergency Services Facility 

III. Economic Development 

a. Downtown Riverfront Development 

b. Riverport West Intermodal Park 

c. Purchase Area Regional Industrial Park 

IV. Transportation 

a. Marine Industry ~ support IMTS Capital Projects Business Model 

• Kentucky Lock 

• Olmsted Dam 

• Paducah / McCracken County Riverport Container-on-Barge Facility 

b. Barkley Regional Airport 

c. Interstate Highways -1-66 & 1-69 

Number One State Policy Issue: 

• Advocate for lifting the moratorium on nuclear projects 

State Funding Priorities 

I. Education projects — $27 million 

K-12 

• Paducah Middle School - $ 17 mil. Bonding ($ 1.2 mil. in 2010) 

Post Secondary 

• WKCTC - Paducah School of Art - $9 mil. 

• Murray State University/Extension Campus - $ 1.7 mil. 

n . Economic Development 

• Riverport West Intermodal Park - $6 mil. 

• Purchase Area Regional Industrial Park 

lU. Transportation 

• Surface Roads and Highway Projects 

IV. Community Development 

• River Discovery Center 

6-4-10