alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# AGENCY:

 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

# ACTION:

 Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

 This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-1248-DR), dated September 24, 1998, and related determinations.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

 January 20, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                     Notice is hereby given that, in a letter dated January 20, 2000, the President concurred with the Director's recommendation to adjust the cost sharing arrangements concerning Federal funds provided under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 51521*et seq.*), and the Insular Areas Act (10 U.S.C. 1469a(d) in a letter to James L. Witt, Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, as follows:                

I have determined that the damage in the U.S. Virgin Islands, resulting from Hurricane Georges on September 19-22, 1998, is of sufficient severity and magnitude that special conditions are warranted regarding the cost sharing arrangements for Federal funds provided under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, P.L. 93-288, as amended (“the Stafford Act”).

Therefore, I concur with your recommendation to amend my declaration of September 24, 1998 to authorize Federal funds for the Individual and Family Grant, Public Assistance, and Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs at 90 percent of total eligible costs.

Please notify the Federal Coordinating Officer of this amendment to my major disaster declaration.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

James L. Witt,

Director.

[FR Doc. 00-2667 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### CITY OF MINERAL WELLS, Appellant, v. Ralph K. ALEXANDER et al., Appellees.

No. 14396.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

May 14, 1943.

W. P. Smith and W. O. Gross, both of Mineral Wells, for appellant.

Grindstaff, Zellers & Hutcheson, of Weatherford, for appellees.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

In view of the opinion of the Supreme Court, delivered on April 7, 1943, in City of Mineral Wells v. Hon. Atwood McDonald, Chief Justice et ah, 170 S.W.2d 466, the judgment heretofore rendered by this court on June 12, 1942, is hereby set aside, and our former opinion, reported *in*163 S.W.2d 721, is hereby withdrawn, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and judgment is here rendered sustaining the plea of privilege filed by the City of Mineral Wells.
1 ... T h i s pr oce edi n g a r i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. N M 054859, s t y l ed St at e of Texas v. Larr

y H aynes , in th e 2 9 0 th Jud i ci al D i st ri ct C o urt , B exar C o unt y , T exas, t he H o no rable Sharo n M acR ae p res i d i ng. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -1 0- 00 36 9- CR IN RE L ar

r y HA YN ES Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice

Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J une 2, 2010 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On May 12, 2010, relator L arr

y Hay nes filed a petition for writ of manda mus, complaining of the tr ia l c ourt ’s fa ilure to r ule on his va ri ou s pro se mot ion s. Howeve r, counse l has bee n appointed to repr esent re lator in the cr iminal procee ding pe nding in t he tr ia l court fo r w hic h h e is c ur re ntl y c on fi ne d. A c ri min a l de fe nd ant i s n ot e nti tle d to hy br id
r e p r e s e n tati o n. See Ro bin so n v . S tat e , 2 40 S.W. 3d

91 9, 92 2 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 07 ); Patrick v. Sta te , 906 S.W .2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A t rial cour t has no leg al duty

to rule on a pr o
se motion filed with reg ard to a criminal proc eedingin which the def endant is re p resented by counsel. See Robinson , 240 S.W .3d at 922. Consequently , the trial cour t did not abuse its discretion04
- 10
- 00 36 9- CR

- 2- by de c lin ing to ru le on

re la tor ’s va

ri ou s pr o s e mot ion s f

ile d in the c ri min a l pr oc e e din g pe nd ingin the trial cour

t. Accor dingly , re l at o r’ s p eti tion for writ of manda mus is denied. T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a)
. PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                         275,732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,491,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,300
<INVENTORY>                                  2,286,916
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,398,082
<PP&E>                                       4,786,571
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,561,478
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,320,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,064,126
<BONDS>                                      1,353,111
<COMMON>                                        66,639
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,056,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,320,977
<SALES>                                      4,235,660
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,235,660
<CGS>                                        2,793,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,886,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (13,934)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                285,050
<INCOME-TAX>                                    59,740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            225,310
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  9,104
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   234,414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .088
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .084
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           33784
<SECURITIES>                                      3983
<RECEIVABLES>                                   163625
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3544
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                326133
<PP&E>                                          318799
<DEPRECIATION>                                  174567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  619779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           221023
<BONDS>                                          24681
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         17731
<OTHER-SE>                                      293533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    619779
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                856752
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   810650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 77687
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   990
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (35201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (12793)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (22408)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   6787
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (15621)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.17)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1



Annual Servicer Compliance Certificate

pursuant to

Section 3.9 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement

and

Item 1123 of Regulation AB










USAA AUTO
OWNER TRUST 2015-1





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of USAA Federal Savings
Bank, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July
29, 2015 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing
Agreement”), by and among USAA Auto Owner Trust 2015-1, USAA Acceptance, LLC, the Servicer and U.S. Bank National Association,
as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from July 29, 2015 through December 31, 2015, and of its performance
under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                             

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects
under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout such period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate
on behalf of the Servicer this 30th day of March, 2016.



| | /s/ Martha Leiper            
| | -----------------------------
| | Name:  Martha Leiper         
| | Title:  Senior Vice President
#### Murray Mass, Appellant, *v.*Viemont Rug and Carpet Cleaning Company, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

January 7, 1958.

*Solomon B. Terkeltaub*for appellant.

*Henry Gallop*and *S. Frederick Placer*for respondent,

*960
      *Per Curiam.*

Defendant on cross-examination conceded that the color of the fabric had run. He had made a test patch before shampooing the sofa which should have advised him that in this instance shampooing would be a negligent manner of doing the work; that this particular sofa called for dry cleaning. Either his work was negligent or his test patch was negligent. In any event, in addition to negligence, there was a breach of warranty and plaintiff’s motion to conform the pleadings to the proof should have been granted in view of the fact that defendant could not be surprised because the bill of particulars had expressly contained the information about the test patch and defendant’s representations.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law and the facts, with $30 costs to plaintiff, and judgment granted in favor of the plaintiff for $350, with costs.

Pette, Hart and Di Giovanna, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-2676EM

_____________ Mark Dotzler; * * Plaintiff, * * Kevin Laughlin; Edward Dyck; * Carrie Alspaw, * * Plaintiffs-Appellants, * * v. * * Ross Perot; The Perot Petition * Committee; Mark Alan Blahnik; The * Calahan & Gibbons Group; U.S. * Datalink, Inc.; * * Appeals from the United States Defendants-Appellees, * District Court for the Eastern District * of Missouri. Equifax Credit Information Services; * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant, * * TRW, Inc.; * * Defendant-Appellee, * * Russ Melbye; Sandra Stone McClure, * * Defendants. *

____________________ * *-2-

Kevin Laughlin; Edward Dyck; * Carrie Alspaw, * * Plaintiffs-Appellants, * * v. * * Ross Perot; The Perot Petition * Committee; Mark Alan Blahnik; The * Calahan & Gibbons Group; U.S. * Datalink, Inc.; * * Defendants-Appellees, * * Equifax Credit Information Services; * * Defendant, * * TRW, Inc.; * * Defendant-Appellee, * * Russ Melbye; Sandra Stone McClure, * * Defendants. *

_____________ No. 96-2677EM

_____________ Mark Dotzler; * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * Kevin Laughlin; Edward Dyck; * Carrie Alspaw, *-3- Plaintiffs, * * v. * * Ross Perot; * * Defendant-Appellee, * * The Perot Petition Committee; Mark * Alan Blahnik; * * Defendants, * * The Calahan & Gibbons Group; U.S. * Datalink, Inc.; * * Defendants-Appellees, * * Equifax Credit Information Services; * * Defendant, * * TRW, Inc.; * * Defendant-Appellee, * * Russ Melbye; Sandra Stone McClure, * * Defendants. *

____________________ * * Kevin Laughlin; Edward Dyck; * Carrie Alspaw, * * Plaintiffs, * * v. *-4-

Ross Perot; * * Defendant-Appellee, * * The Perot Petition Committee; Mark * Alan Blahnik; * * Defendants, * * The Calahan & Gibbons Group; U.S. * Datalink, Inc.; * * Defendants-Appellees, * * Equifax Credit Information Services; * * Defendant, * * TRW, Inc.; * * Defendant-Appellee, * * Russ Melbye; Sandra Stone McClure, * * Defendants. *

_____________ Submitted: August 21, 1997

Filed: August 26, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM.-5-

KevinL aughlin, Edward Dyck, Carrie Alspaw, and Mark Dotzler appeal the district court's orders dismissing for lack of personal jurisdiction their claims agains t Ross Per ot, Mark Alan Blahnik, and The Calahan & Gibbons Group, and granting summary judgment in favor of U.S. Datalink, Inc. and TRW, Inc. S ee Dotzler v. Perot , 899 F. Supp. 416 (E.D. Mo. 1995); Dotzler v. Perot , 914 F. Supp. 328, 330 (E.D. Mo. 1996). Although the district court's rulings did not dispose of a ll the claims and parties, the district court entered final judgment for t hese appellees under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Having carefullyreviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we find noerrors of law in the district court's analysis. We thus affirm the district court' s rulings. See8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny the appellants' motions to supplement the record on appeal, and deny all other motions on appeal as moot. A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 24

                             CHAPMAN HOLDINGS, INC.
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned Directors and 
Executive Officers of Chapman Holdings, Inc., incorporated in the State of 
Maryland, hereby constitute and appoint Nathan A. Chapman, Jr. and Earl U. 
Bravo, Sr., and either of them, the true and lawful agents and 
attorney-in-fact of the undersigned with full power and authority in either 
said agent and attorney-in-fact, to sign for the undersigned and in their 
respective names as Directors and/or Executive Officers of Chapman Holdings, 
Inc., the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, and any and all further amendments 
to said report, hereby ratifying and confirming all acts taken by such agent 
and attorney-in-fact, as herein authorized.

Dated as of: March 6, 1998



/S/ NATHAN A. CHAPMAN, JR.                    /S/ DONALD V. WATKINS
----------------------------------------      -------------------------------
Nathan A. Chapman, Jr., President,            Donald V. Watkins, Director,
Chairman of Board of Directors and
Director (Principal Executive Director)



/S/ EARL U. BRAVO, SR.,                       /S/ LOTTIE H. SHACKELFORD
----------------------------------------      -------------------------------
Earl U. Bravo, Sr., Director                  Lottie H. Shackelford, Director



/S/ M. LYNN BALLARD
----------------------------------------
M. Lynn Ballard, Treasurer and Controller
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Account Officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**



In connect with the quarterly
report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended February 29, 2004 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on
or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

|Date: April 13, 2004 | By: | /s/ Mark V. McDonough                     
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                     |     | Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer
13th Amendment to the AARP Health Insurance Agreement



 Exhibit 10.ll 
  
 THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE AARP HEALTH INSURANCE AGREEMENT: 
  
 PHIP EXTENSION 
  
 This Thirteenth Amendment to the AARP Health Insurance Agreement
(“Thirteenth Amendment” or “Amendment”), effective as of December 21, 2005 (the “Effective Date”), is made by and between AARP Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ASI”) and United HealthCare
Insurance Company, a Connecticut corporation (“United”). The parties hereto shall collectively be referred to as the “Parties”. 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 WHEREAS, AARP, the Trustees of the AARP Insurance Plan (“Trustees”), and United are parties to a certain AARP Health Insurance Agreement dated
as of February 26, 1997 (the “Original Agreement”). 
  
 WHEREAS, by subsequent amendment and assignment on December 28, 1999, AARP, AARP Trust and United agreed to the assignment to and assumption by ASI of certain rights and obligations (the “Third Amendment”). 
  
 WHEREAS, various other amendments have been made to the Original Agreement
(collectively, the “Agreement”). 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant
to the Ninth Amendment to the Agreement, the Parties have successfully piloted a program offering comprehensive insurance products for AARP members age 50 to 64 (“50-64 Plan”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the Pilot Period, as defined in the Agreement, expires on December 31, 2005; and 
  

 1 








 WHEREAS, the parties wish to extend the Pilot Period through February 28, 2006. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	A.	Article 2 of the Agreement is amended by amending section 2.134 to read as follows: 

  

	 	  	“2.134. Pilot Period means January 1, 2004 until February 28, 2006. The Pilot Period may be changed upon mutual written agreement. Any 50-64 Plan sales
effective as of the end of 2003 and their experience will be included as part of the Pilot Period.” 

  

	 	B.	No later than the end of the Pilot Period, the parties shall complete negotiations in good faith and reach agreement on new terms or a new agreement governing the 50-64 Plan, if the
parties decide to offer the 50-64 Plan beyond the Pilot Period. 

  

	 	C.	Except as amended hereby, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This amendment may be executed in two counterparts, each of which
need not contain the signature of more than one party. Both counterparts taken together shall constitute one and the same amendment. 

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first above written. 
  
  
  

			
	AARP Services, Inc.	  	United HealthCare Insurance Company
	 	  	 
	 	  	 
	 By: /s/ Dawn M. Sweeney
 Title:
	  	 By: /s/ Thomas H. Lindquist
 Title: COO, Ovations


  
  

 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 17, 2017

No. 04-16-00532-CV

FRANKLIN ADVISERS, INC., on behalf of certain investment funds managed by it; Oz 

Management LP, on behalf of certain investment funds managed by it, Oz Management II LP, on 

behalf of certain investment funds managed by it; and Benefit Street Partners, LLC,

Appellants

v.

IHEARTCOMMUNICATIONS INC., f/k/a Clear Channel Communication, Inc.,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-04006

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants’ and appellee's joint motion to correct reporter's record by striking 

erroneously included exhibit is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of February, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court