.--" I , -~ ~:~ r:. - r • .-; '.'J~""';"'_ ;., .....: ~.- '-' '-' "._. ..;... 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

DMSION OF AIR QUALITY 

:-':onnan H. Bangerter 

Governor. 

Kenneth L. Alkema 

ExecutIve Director 

1950 West Norm Temole 

Salt lake C,:y. U:ar, 

"<eoly:o State 0: L.;tan 

Dl\fJS10.'"1 of AIr Q~ailty

F. Burneil Cordner (801) 536·4000 Deoartmem 01 EnVIronmental Q~a:lry

Director (801) 536-4099 Fax Sal,laKE City. L.;tan 8411 ':-4820 

DAQE-4l6-92 

April	 28, 1992 

James R. Van Orman 

Director of Environmental Hanagement 

Department of the Air Force 

Hill A.F.B., Utah 84056-5990 

Re:	 Approval Order for Indus~rial Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge Dryers, 

Building 577 

Davis	 County CDS Al NA 

Dear Hr. Van Orman: 

The above-referenced project has been evaluated and found to be consistent with 

the requirements of the Utah Air Conservation Rules (UACR) and the Utah Air 

Conservation Act. A 30-day public comment period was held and all comments 

received were evaluated. The conditions of this Approval Order (AO) reflect any 

changes to the proposed conditions which resulted from the evaluation of the 

commen~s received. This air quality AO au~horizes the project with the following 

conditions and failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a 

violation of this order: 

1.	 Hill Air Force Base, shall install and operate the Industrial 

Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge Dryers in Building 577 according to 

the information submitted in the Notice of Intent dated September 4, 

1991. 

A copy of this AO shall be posted on site and shall be available to 

the employees who operate the air emission producing equipment. All 

employees who operate the air emission producing equipment shall 

redeive instruction as to their responsibilities in operating the 

equipment in compliance with all of the relevant conditions. 

4.2.4-713 
Mr. Van Orman -


April 2B, 1992 

Page 2 

2. The approved inst:allations shall consist of the following equipment: 

A.	 Two JWI Metal Hydrox~de Sludge Volume Reducers 

Model: J360G 

Heat source: Natural gas 

Burner rating: 400,000 BTU/hr 

Gas consumption: 400 CFH 

B.	 Two JWI single speed wet venturi scrubbers 

Scrubber water usage: 3 GPM 

Dry gas: 79.93 SCFM 

Humidity: 51\ 

Saturation Temp: IB4°F 

Discharge Volume: 293 ACFM 

3.	 Emissions to the atmosphere of NOx from the sludge dryer exhaust 

stacks shall not exceed the following rates and concentrations: 

A.	 200 ppmdv (7\ oxygen, dry) 

B.	 0.47 lb/hr (per st:ack) 

4.	 Stack testing to show compliance with the emission limitations in 

condition #3 shall be performed as specified below: 

Emission Point Pollutant	 Testing Retest 

Status 

Dryer	 exhaust stacks s *** 

Testing Status (To be applied above) 

§	 The stacks shall be tested for NOx emissions compliance within 

30 days of start-up using a portable testing instrument 

approved by the Executive Secretary 

***	 The dryer stacks shall be retest:ed every 30 dryer operating 

days ± 10 days. The maximum time between tests shall be 35 

dryer operating days. 

5.	 Test Procedure 

Dryer stack emissions testing shall be performed by the following 

procedure or an approved equivalent. Equivalency shall be determined 

by the Executive Secretary and approved prior to tests being .-... 

conducted. 

4.2.4-714 
","-

Mr. Van Orman 

April	 28, 1992 

Page 3 

A. - Sample Port 

A sampling port shall be installed in each dryer exhaust stack in 

accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix 8, Performance Specification #2 

or as	 approved by the Executive Secretary. The sample ports shall be 

safely accessible to the tester, operator, or inspector in accordance 

with OSHA standards. 

8. - Operating Rate 

The steam production or operating rate during testing shall be 

performed under three operating rates; 90%, 70\ and 50\ (all ±10\) of 

the dryers' rated capacities. 

C. - Test Instrument 

The test procedure shall be conducted using a portable testing 

instrument approved by the Executive Secretary. The testing 

instrument shall be calibrated on site with a suitable N8S referenced 

or traceable calibration gas in accordance with the instruction of 

the test instrument. 

D. - Test Procedure 

The test shall be conducted in the following manner: 

(1)	 The dryers shall be: 

a)	 operated at the designated production rate .­

Condition #58 

b)	 allowed to stabilize for a minimum of 5 minutes. 

(2)	 The gas sample shall be drawn according to the 

instructions of the test instrument being used. 

(3)	 The sample value shall be determined from the test 

instrument, appropriate calculations made, and the data 

recorded. 

E. - Failed Dryer Status 

(1 ) If a dryer is unable to attain the emission limitation in 

Condition #3, at anyone of the operating ~ates specified 

in condition #58, the dryer shall be taken out of service 

until the unit has been repaired or maintenance performed 

and a successful retest completed. 

4.2.4-715 
Mr. Van Orman 

April 28, 1992 

Page 4 

(2 ) Maintenance and repairs of any dryer that fails the 

periodical test shall be performed within 15 days, or 

dryer shall be idled. 

the 

a) If a dryer that has failed a test is repaired and 

successful retest completed according to the 

limitations of Condition 13 within 15 days, the 

dryer shall be determined to not have been in 

violation. 

a 

b) A dryer that fails the retest after repair shall be 

idled until further repairs are made and a 

successful retest completed. If the dryer demand 

requires the dryer to be operated, it shall be base 

loaded at the rate that will result in the lowest 

emissions rate possible until the dryer can be 

repaired and shown in compliance by the above test. 

c) Operation of a dryer that 

"retest after repair" may 

violation of this AO. 

has failed the above 

be determined to be a 

-. 

F. - Reports 

A copy of all test reports containing the test results, any 

calculations required, and the test instrument calibration data shall 

be retained by the owner/operator for two years. The reports shall 

be made available to the Executive Secretary or his agent upon 

request. An annual summary report of all the test results with a 

--_.. -~ ~~~ _c_;_~'_~l -n----_ e~~" be submitted to the Executive 

Secretary no later ~.. _,anuary.)l of each year for the previous 

calendar year. 

6.	 Visible emissions from any point or fugitive emission source 

associated with the installation or control facilities in this NOI 

shall not exceed 10% ooacitv. Opacity observations of emissions from 

stationary sources shall be conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A, Method 9. 

7.	 The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as a primary fuel in 

the two sludge dryers located in Building 577. If any other fuel is 

to be used, an AO shall be required in accordance with R307-l-3.l, 

UAC. 

8.	 All records referenced in ~his AO or in an applicable NSPS or 

NESHAPS, which are required to be kept by the owner/operator, shall 

be made available to the Executive Secretary or his representative 

upon request. 

4.2.4-716 
Mr. Van Orman 

April 28, 1992 

Page 5 

9.	 All installations and facilities authorized by this AO shall be 

adequately and properly maintained. ~he owner/operator shall comply 

with R307-1-3.5 and 4.7, UAC. R307-1-3.5, UAC addresses emission 

inventory reporting requirements. R307-1-4.7, UAC addresses 

unavoidable breakdown reporting requirements. The owner/operator 

shall calculate/estimate the excess emissions whenever a breakdown 

occurs. The sum total of excess emissions shall be reported to the 

Executive Secretary for each calendar year no later than January 31 

of the following year. 

le.	 Th~ Execu~ive Secretary shall be notified in writing upon start-up of 

the installation, as an initial compliance inspection is required. 

Eighteen months from the date of this AO the Executive Secretary 

shall be notified in writing of the status of installation if 

installation is not completed. At that time the Executive Secretary 

shall require documentation of the continuous installation of the 

operation and may revoke the AO in accordance with R307-l-3.l.5, UAC. 

Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must also be 

approved in accordance with R307-l-3.l.1, UAC. 

This AO in no way releases the owner or operator from any liability for 

compliance with all other applicable federal, state, and local regulations 

including the Utah Air Conservation Rules. 

Annual emissions for this source (the wastewater treatment plant sludge dryers in 

building 577) are currently calculated at the following values: 

A.	 1. 026 tons/yr for Particulate 

B.	 0.453 tons/yr for PH10 

c.	 0.002 tons/yr for 502 

D.	 2.050 tons/yr for NOx E.	 1. 328 tons/yr for VOC 

F.	 0.149 tons/yr for CO 

These calculations are for the purposes of determining the applicability of PSD 

and nona~tainment area major source requirements of the UACR. 

Sincerely, 

: ! . 
 

\'/;1 1,-: 1 ; r J. !/~Ll,l;rl "­ 1	 \...t L-'-. ,

f l ". . v' v l'\ ' " 

F. Burnell Cordner, Executive Secretary 

Utah Air Quality Board 

FBC:HGN:cl 

cc:	 EPA Region VIII, Hike Owens 

Davis County Health Department 

4.2.4-717 
UTAH DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
 

NEW/MODIFIED SOURCE PLAN REVIEW
 

James R. Van Orman 

Director of Environmental Management 

Department of the Air Force 

Hill A.F.B .• Utah 84056-5990 

RE:	 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge 

Dryers, Building 577 

Davis County CDS Al NA 

ENGINEER:	 Herman G. Nellestein 

DATE:	 February 12, 1992 

NOTICE OF INTENT DATED:	 September 4, 1991 

PLANT CONTACT:	 Jay Guptc. 

PHONE NUMBER:	 (801) 777-6917 

PLANT LOCATION:	 Building 577, Hill Air ?orce Base, Utah 

FEES: 

Filing Fee S 1500.00 

Review Engineer - XX hours at SSO.OO/hour S 0.00 

Modeler - 00 hours at SSO.OO/hour S 000.00 

Computer Usage Fee S 000.00 

Notice to Paper S 00.00 

Travel - 00 miles at SO.23/mile S 000.00 

Total S 1500.00 

APPROVALS: 

Engineering Unit Manager ~~~~/~~_·~\----~~~--~/-·~----~;r--~--~-~-------

Applicant Contact Made 81\
 

1 

4.2.4-718 
T

.... NSPS - NO PSD - NO ~ESHAPS - ~O

TOXICS - NO TITLE V - NO TOXIC MAJOR - NO 

NONATT MAJOR - NO 

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 

Hill AFB has submitted a Notice of Intent dated September 4, 1991 to replace 

two electric batch sludge dryers in Building 577. These dryers were not 

permitted. The replacement dryers are conti~uous natural gas fired sludge 

dryers. The purpose of the sludge dryers is to process the wastewater 

produced throughout the base, remove the water, and compact the sludge. 

Sludge from the Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant Clarifier is pumped to 

sludge holding tanks in sludge drying Building 577. Raw sludge is treated 

with lime and pumped to a filter press for dewatering to 70 percent solids. 

Dewatered sludge is then fed to a sludge dryer feed hopper via a dump trolley. 

Sludge is dried to 5 - 107. moisture in two JWI Hodel J360G continuous moving 

belt gas fired sludge dryers at a temperature of about 550°F. 

Dried granular sludge is emptied into a dumpster via a screw conveyor for 

disposal. The dried sludge is disposed by an outside vendor at a proper 

disposal site. Off gas from the dryers is treated in venturi scrubbers 

before being exhausted to the atmosphere. The scrubbers are 95 - 98% 

effective in removing emissions. Manufacturers' bulletins on dryers are 

contained in the NOI. 

II. EMISSION SUMMARY 

The emissions from this source (sludge dryers) will be as follows: 

Total Emissions 

Particulate 1.026 ton/yr 

PM10 0.453 

S02 0.002 

NO,;: 2.050 

CO 0.149 

VOC non meth 1.328 

VOC meth 0.001 

Metals 0.131 

III. BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (BACT) ANALYSIS 

HAFB has chosen to use natural gas to supply heat in the dryers. The dryers 

are to be equipped with ~igh efficiency venturi impactor scrubbers and 

cyclonic separators. Removal efficiency of 95 - 98% is achieved with 6 - 8 

inches water column pressure drop across :~e scrubber. 

Specifications of the scrubbers are as fo:lows: 

Dry gas: 79.93 SCFM 

Humidity: 51% 

2 

4.2.4-719
 
Saturation Temp.:
 

Discharge Volume:
 

Two stacks each eight inches in diameter will exhaust approximately 300 acfm. 

The point of discharge is approximately 30 feet above grade. There are no 

sampling points provided. Normally, dryers are operated during the day shift. 

However, in the event of sludge back-up, they may be operated in other shifts. 

All emission calculations were based on 24 hour-per-day operations. 

No other systems were investigated. The selected system, operating on natural 

gas and the use of venturi scrubbers is considered BACT by HAFB. The 

Engineering Section recommends the following limits as BACT: 

A.	 10% opacity 

B.	 NOx - ZOO ppm (7% oxygen dry) 

IV.	 APPLICABILITY OF FEDERAL AND UT~q AIR CONSERVATION RULES (UACRl 

This Notice of Intent is for a minor modi:ication of a major source. It is 

not a new major source or a major modification. The following federal 

regulations and state rules have been examined to determine their 

applicability to this Notice of Intent: 

1.	 R-446-1-3.1 - Notice of Intent required for a modified source. 

This rule applies. 

2.	 R-446-1-3.1.7 (a) - Notice of Intent not required for fuel burning 

equipment with a rated capacity of less than 5 x 106 BTU per hour 

using no other fuel than natural gas. This rule does not apply to 

sludge dryers even if fired by natural gas. 

3.	 R-446-1-3.1.8(A) - Application of best available control 

technology (BACT) required at all emissio~ points. This rule 

applies. 

4.	 R-446-1-3.1.8(D) - Enforceable offset of 1.2:1 required for new 

sources or modifications which would produce an emission increase 

greater than or equal to 50.00 tons per year of any combination of 

PM10 , S02' and NOx ' This is required in Salt Lake, Davis, and Utah 

Counties and in any area that impacts these three counties as 

defined in the rule. The effective date is November 15, 1990. 

This rule will not apply to this NOI. 

5.	 R-446-1-3.1.8(D) - Enforceable offset of 1:1 required for new 

sources or modifications which would produce an emission increase 

greater than or equal to 25.00 tons per year of any combination of 

PM10 ' 502' and NOx ' This is required in Salt Lake, Davis, and Utah 

:ounties and in any area that impacts these three counties as 

defined in the rule. The effective date is November 15, 1990. 

This rule will not apply to this NOI. 

3 

4.2.4-720 
6.	 R-446-1-3.1.9 - Rules for relocation of temporary sources. This 

source is a permanent source. Therefore, this rule does not 

apply. 

7.	 R-446-1-3.1.12 - Requirement for installation of low-NOx burners 

on all existing sources whenever existing fuel combustion burners 

are replaced, unless the replacement is not physically practical 

or cost effective. The effective date is November 15, 1990. This 

rule applies. ~owever, ~~sLalla~ion may not be COSL effecLive. 

8.	 R-446-1-3.2.1 - Particulate emission limitations for existing 

sources which are located in a nonattainment area. This rule has 

been superseded by the PM10 SIP, except for Weber County. The 

effective date is August 14, 1991. The sources listed in Weber 

County are as follows: 

A.	 Farmers Grain Coop 

B.	 Fife Rock Products 

C.	 Interpace Corporation 

D.	 Parsons Asphalt Plant 

E.	 Pillsbury Company 

F.	 Teledyne Incinerator 

G.	 Gibbons and Reed Asphal: 

HAFB is not listed in the SIP. This rule does not apply. 

9.	 R-446-1-3.3.2 - Review requirements for new major sources or major 

modifications which are located in a nonattainment area or which 

impact a nonattainment area. This Notice of Intent does not 

represent a new major source or a major modification. Therefore, 

this rule will not apply. 

10.	 R-446-1-3.5 - Emission inventory reporting requirements. This 

rule requires any source which emits 25 tons or more per year of 

any pollutant to submit an emission inventory to the Division of 

Air Quality at least every third year or as determined necessary 

by the Executive Secretary. This source does not emit 25 tons per 

year of any pollutant. Therefore, HAFB must comply with this 

rule. 

11.	 R-446-1-3.6.3 - PSD Increment Consumption - This rule lists the 

allowable PSD increment consumption. Under the PSD rules, the 

entire state has been Lriggered for TSP, S02' and NO ' The x
 

allowable increments are 2S ~ollows:
 

TSP 

A.	 Class I areas 

1) 5 ~g/m3 (annual) 

2) 10 ~g/m3 (24 hour) 

4 

4.2.4-721 
B.	 Class II areas 

1) 19 ~g/m3 (annual) 

2) 37 ~g/m3 (24 hour) 

A.	 Class I areas 

1) 2 ~g/m3 (annual) 

2) 5 ~g/m3 (24 hour) 

3 )	 25 ~g/m3 (3 hour) 

B.	 Class II areas 

1) 20 f.Lg/ m3 (annual) 

2) 91 f.Lg/ m3 (24 hour) 

3 ) 512 ~g/m3 (3 hour) 

A.	 Class I areas - 2.5 f.Lg/m3 (annual) 

B.	 Class ~I areas - 25 f.Lg/m3 (annual) 

There are also Class III increments, which do not apply in Utah. 

The above increments apply at all locations, unless the area is 

already nonattainment. The entire increment may not be available 

at all locations due to previously permitted sources consuming 

increment. 

12.	 R-446-1-3.6.5(b) - Prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) 

review requirements for new major sources or major modifications. 

This Notice of Intent does not represent a new major source or a 

major modification under PSD rules. Therefore, this rule does not 

apply. 

13.	 R-446-1-3.6.6 Increment violations. This rule requires the DACC· 

to promulgate a plan and implement rules to eliminate any PSD 

increment violations which occur in the sLate. No known 

violations have yet occurred. These sludge dryers will consume no 

increment. They are existing (they are being replaced) but were 

never approved. 

14.	 R-446-l-3.8 - Stack height rule. This rule limiLS the creditable 

height of SLacks to that height determined to be good engineering 

practice. The formulas used to determine good engineering 

practice are found in 40 CFR 51.100. A deminimus height of 65 

meters (213.2 feet) is allowed. Building 577, Hill AFB, has no 

stacks which exceed 65 meters in height. It is in compliance with 

this rule. 

5 

4.2.4-722 
15.	 R-446-1-3.11 - Visibili~y screening analysis requirements. This 

rule requires all new major sources or major modifications to 

undergo a visibility screening analysis to determine visibility 

impact on any mandatory Class area. This Notice of Intent does 

~ot represent a new major source or a major modification under 

UACR rules. Therefore, this rule does not apply. 

16.	 R-446-1-4.1.2 - 20% opacity limitation at all emission points 

unless a more stringeD~ :imitctiou is required by New Source 

Performance Standards (~SPS) or BACT or National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS). In this case an 

opacity limitation of 15% is recommended as BACT. 

17.	 R-446-1-4.1.9 - EPA Method 9 to be used for visible emission 

observations. This rule applies. 

18.	 R-446-1-4.2.1 - Sulfur content limitations in oil and coal used 

for combustion. This emission point does not use oil or coal for 

combustion. This rule does not apply. 

19.	 R-446-1-4.6 - Conti~~ous Emission Monitoring Systems Program ­

Reporting and technical requirements for continuous emission 

monitoring systems. :t covers breakdowns and quarterly repor~s

for continuous monitoring systems. Section 4.6.5 states that this 

regulation applies to the following: 

A.	 Sources required to install CEMS as required by the 

following documents; 

1) NSPS 

2) State Implementation Plan 

3) Approval Order 

4) Consent Decree 

5) Administrative Orders and Agreements 

B.	 Any source that constructs after the promulgation of this 

rule two or more emission points, which may interfere with 

VEO's, shall install an opacity monitor on each stack. 

20.	 R-446-1-4.7 - Unavoidable jreakdown repor~ing requirements. This 

rule applies. Section 4.7.1 disc~sses repor·:-:, -equirements. A 

breakdown for any period longer t;-,an 2 hours rr,l..';; ... be reported to 

the Executive Secretary within 3 hours of the beginning of the 

breakdown, if reasonable. but ir. no case longer than 18 hours 

after the beginning of the breakdown. A written report is 

required within 7 calendar days. The report shall include the 

estimated quantity of pollutants (total and excess). Section 

4.7.2	 discusses penalties. 

21.	 R-446-1-4.9 - Review requirements for vola~i1e organic compound 

(VOC) sources located ir. a r.or.attai~~ent area for ozone 

constructed in 1980 or earlier. This process is not covered in 

6 

4.2.4-723 
:-- ... _ ........ .. I..:..
 

22.	 R-446-1-5 Emergency episode requirements. This rule applies. 

23.	 R-446-1-7 - Air Pollution Episode Plan - This plan provides the 

basis for taking action to prevent air pollu~ant concentrations 

from reaching levels which could endanger the public health. or to 

abate such concentrations should they occur. All sources in a 

:.o:-.c.':.~o.i.u,men'':' &:-ea 0:- impact.::' ...:, c. nonat~ainment. c.l'c.:i ::'l'... st submit 3. 

plan outlining what they will do in an emergency episode. This 

regulation applies to Salt Lake, Davis, and Utah Counties. 

24.	 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) - There is no NSPS for 

this industrial process. 

25.	 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) 

- There is no NESHAPS for this indust.rial process. 

26.	 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) - This source is 

locat.ed in Davis County, which is a nonattainment area for ozone. 

The Division of Air Quality guidelines do no~ call for this source 

to be modeled for any pollutant. The Division has found through 

experience that, because of the small quantity of emissions 

involved and the conservative predictions made by modeling, a 

source or emission point of this small size is very unlikely to 

cause a new violation of the NAAQS. 

27.	 40 CFR 60.14, Definition of Modification - Any physical or 

operational change to an existing facility which results in an 

increase in the emission rate to the atmosphere of any pollutant 

to which an NSPS standard applies. The following are not by 

themselves considered modifications: 

1)	 Maintenance, repair, and replacement 

2)	 An increase in'production rate of an existing facility, if 

that increase can be accomplished without a capital 

expenditure on that facility 

3)	 An increase in the hours of operation 

4)	 Use of an alternative fuel or raw material if, prior t.o the 

date any standard under this part becomes applicable to that 

source type, as provided by 60.1, t.he existing facility was 

designed to accommodate chat alternative use 

S)	 The addition or use of any system or device whose primary 

function is the reduction of air pollutants 

6)	 Relocation or change in ownership 

Also see Section 1.92, which is the State's definition. It is a 

7 

4,2.4-724
 
28. 40 CFR 60.15, Definition of Reconstruction - the replacement of 

components of an existing facility to such an extent that: 

1)	 The fixed capital cost of the new components exceeds 50% of 

the fixed capital cost that would be required to construct a 

comparable entirely new facility and 

2)	 It is technologically and economically feasible to meet the 

applicable standards set forth in this part 

This Notice of Intent is not a reconstruction. 

29.	 R-446-1-1.89, Definition of Maior Modification - It means any 

physical change in or change in the method of operation of a major 

source that would result in a significant net emission increase of 

any pollutant. A net emissions increase that is significant fo~

VOC shall be considered significant for ozone. A physical change 

or change in the method of operation shall not include: 

A.	 Routine maintenance, repair, or replacement 

B.	 Use of an alternative fuel or raw material by reason of an 

order under Section 2a and b of the ESECA of 1974 or by 

reason of a natural gas curtailment plan pursuant to the 

Federal Power Act 

C.	 Use of an alternative fuel by reason of an order unde~

Section 125 of the CAA 

D.	 Use of an alternative fuel at a steam generating unit to the 

extent that the fuel is generated from municipal solid waste 

E.	 Use of an alternative fuel or raw material by a source: 

1)	 which the source was capable of accommodating before 

January 6, 1975, unless such change would be 

prohibited under any enforceable permit condition 

2)	 which the source is otherwise approved to use 

F.	 An increase in the hours of operation or the production ~ate

unless such change woule be prohibited under any enforceable 

permit condition 

G.	 Any change in ownership at a source 

This Notice of Intent is not a majo~ modification. 

V. RECOMMENDED APPROVAL ORDER CONDITIONS 

8 

4.2.4-725 
~.	 ~~_~~ nl~ &~~~c D~S~, saa~~ lns~~~~ ana op~ra~~ ~Ll~

Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge Dryers in 

Building 577 according to the information submitted in the 

Notice of Intent dated September 4,	 1991. 

A copy of this Approval Order shall	 be posted on site and 

shall	 be available to the employees who operate the air 

emission producing equipment. All employees who operate the 

air emission projuci~.g eq'.lip:ne::.t shaLe :",,-<::':-v,,, ~~,,;~ru-..:~_v .. 

as to	 their responsibilities in operating the equipment in 

compliance with all of the relevant	 conditions. 

2.	 The approved installations shall consist of the following 

equipment: 

A.	 Two JWI Metal Hydroxide Sludge Volume Reducers 

Model:	 J360G 

Heat source:	 Natural gas 

Burner rating: 400,000 BTU 

Gas consumption: 400 CFH 

B.	 Two JWI single speed wet venturi scrubbers 

Scrubber water usage: 3 GPM 

Dry gas: 79.93 scm 

Humidity: 51% 

Saturation Temp: 184 of 

Discharge Volume: 293 ACFM 

3.	 Emissions to the atmosphere of NO from the sludge dryer x 

exhaust stacks shall not exceed the following rates and 

concentrations: 

A.	 200 ppmdv (7% oxygen. dry) 

B.	 0.47 lb/hr 

4.	 Stack testing to show compliance with the emission 

limitations of condition 83 shall be performed as specified 

below: 

Emission Point Pollutant	 Testing Retest
 

Status
 

Dryer	 exhaust stacks § *** 

Testing Status (To be applied above) 

§	 The stack shall be tested for NO x emissions 

compliance within 30 days of start-up using a 

portable testing instrument approved by the 

9 

4.2.4-726 
Executive Secretary 

***	 The dryer stack shall be retested every 30 dryer 

operating days ± 10 days. The maximum time 

between tests shall be 35 dryer operation days. 

5.	 Test Procedure 

~ryer s~ack emissions testing shall be perrormed by t~e

following procedure or an approved equivalent. Equivalency 

shall be determined by the Executive Secretary and approved 

prior to tests being conducted. 

A. - Sample Port 

A sampling port shall be installed in each dryer exhaust 

stack	 in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, Performance 

Specification #2 or as approved by the Executive Secretary. 

The sample port shall be safely accessible to the tester, 

operator or inspector i~ accordance with OSHA standards. 

B. - Operating Rate 

The steam production or operating rate during testing shall 

be performed under three operating rates; 90Z, 70Z and 50Z 

(all ±lOZ) of the dryer's rated capacity. 

C. - Test Instrument 

The test procedure shall be conducted using a portable 

testing instrument approved by the Executive Secretary. The 

testing instrument shall be calibrated on site with a 

suitable NBS referenced or traceable calibration gas in 

accordance with the instruction of the test instrument. 

D. - Test Procedure 

The test shall be conducted in the following manner: 

(1)	 The dryer shall be: 

a)	 operated at the designated production rate 

in Condition S.B 

b)	 allowed to stabilize for a minimum of 5 

minutes. 

(2)	 The gas sample shall be drawn according to the 

instructions of the test instrument being used. 

(3)	 The sample value shall be determined from the 

test instrument, appropriate calculations made, 

10 

4.2.4-727 
and the daca recorded. 

E. - Failed Dryer Status 

(1)	 If the dryer is unable to attain the emission 

limitation in Condition 93, at anyone of the 

operating rates specified in condition sB, the 

dryer shall be taken out of service until the 

~r:~L has b~=n repaired or mai2~~:~a~__ ~erfo=ms~

and a successful retest completed. 

(2)	 Maintenance and repairs of any dryer that fails 

the periodical test shall be performed within 15 

days. or the dryer shall be idled. 

a)	 If a dryer that has failed a test is 

repaired and a successful retest completed 

according to the limitations of Condition 

13 within 15 days, the dryer shall be 

determined to not have been in violation. 

b)	 A dryer thac fails the retesc after repair 

shall be idled until further repairs are 

made and a successful retest completed. 

If the dryer demand requires the dryer co 

be operated. it shall be base loaded at 

the rate that will result in the lowest .. 

emissions rate possible u~til the dryer 

can be repaired and shown in compliance by 

the above test. 

c)	 Operation of a dryer that has failed the 

above "retest after repair" may be 

determined to be a violation of this 

Approval Order. 

F. - Reports 

A copy of all test reports containing the test results, any
 

calculations required. and che test instrument calibration
 

data shall be retained by the owner/operator for 2 years.
 

The reporcs shall be made available to the Executive
 

Secretary or his agent upon request. An annual summary
 

report of all the test results with a copy of the periodical
 

reports shall be submitted to the Executive Secretary no
 

later than January 31 of each year for the previous calendar
 

year.
 

6.	 Visible emissions from any point or fugitive emission source 

associated with the installation or concrol facilities in 

~his NOI shall not exceed 10% opacicy. Opacicy observacions 

of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted in 

11 

4.2.4-728 
accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. 

7.	 The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as a primary 

fuel in the two sludge dryers located in Building 577. If 

any other fuel is to be used, an Approval Order shall be 

required in accordance with R446-1-3.1, UAC. 

B.	 All records referenced in this Approval Order or in an 

the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Executive 

Secretary or his representative upon request. 

9.	 All installations and facilities authorized by this Approval 

Order shall be adequately and properly maintained. 

10.	 The owner/operator shall comply with R446-1-3.5, UAC. 

Section 3.5 addresses emission inventory reporting 

requirements. 

11.	 The owner/operator shall comply with R446-1-4.7, UAC. 

Section 4.7 addresses unavoidable breakdown reporting 

requirements. The owner/operator shall calculate/estimate 

the excess emissions whenever a breakdown occurs. The sum 

total of excess emissions shall be reported to the Executive 

Secretary for each calendar year ~o later than January 31 of 

the following year. 

12.	 The Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing upon 

start-up of the installation, as an initial compliance 

inspection is required. Eighteen months from the date of 

this Approval Order the Executive Secretary shall be 

notified in writing of the status of installation if 

installation is not completed. At that time the Executive 

Secretary shall require documentation of the continuous 

installation of the operation and may revoke the Approval 

Order in accordance with R-446-l-3.1.5, UAC. 

Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must 

also be approved in accordance with R-446-1-3.1.1, UAC. 

This Approval Order in no way releases the owner or operator from any 

liability for compliance with all other applicable federal. state, and 

local regulations including the Utah Air Conservation Rules. 

Annual emissions for this source (the wastewater treatment plant sludge 

dryers in building 577) are currently calculated at the following 

values: 

A.	 1.026 tons/yr for Particulate 

B.	 0.453 tons/yr for PM10 

c.	 0.002 tons/yr for S02 

D.	 2.050 tons/yr for NOx 

12 

4.2.4-729 
E. 1.328 tons/yr for VOC 

F. 0.149 tons/yr for CO 

These calculations are for the purposes of determining the applicabil~ty

of PSD and nonattainment area major source requirements of the UACR. 

K:\ ... \DUTCH\WP\HILL577A.RVW o~

13 

4.2.4-730 
..f"'/·e:d ,{~;.r ,r/.!/,:';'e /? 

"7;'? - ..:;.?.;.,"7 

) -­ !--? 

::/' /;' ~,'~./fA! .~

/ ?, if ,,.:z :;? /,7 ,., pr;/ey .. _....-__...1...... • 

;::) ," /.,' / "

/3.../:~ ,-~O /,;/" 

.. s~ ...7'~~/·r/7 ... / ,:,'1-.,:0. 

/8/ .~/-1//~.'", ,~(..,o!)

ftS:>c..-oO'// -? :97;:;0 /,-/c ~.,/~.~.yT~P :J, 2. 3 {.? .~/

/ 

r,~ = --' 

'" /,' /. -2 zt :f /-{;, ~er o.;,.?;' ,,::;:/7;,/ i!~:,1;/ (j" 

J() f ::J, -:'::.5 T r:J' . '-

­ ~.

p/r .;) 

::; - I":~ 1 ,-= - j ," -

.,. =-,' / 9 ? / 

-:::--­ ..:__ ~f/ .r· 'I"-:r ­ r .'" ,/ , _ 0/ I'/, • F:/, .../ :;.. ': ,. _0 _ 

-v ! ~::/~. ~/~J~ _ 

'l./;r¥' 

/./nCr1 

".-_.­-) -~ .~.' .. 

.-..-­ _,.,.1 .t;' I." : ...... , TP(

PrY!/0 ] .J / - '--' 

r

/./;'-rJj::: 2 0::;-0 

-
-. ;~ , 'c··?­

-, 

../ I ?;! 6// ;:/ 

::0 ".~,

/ ::; I r / E S --­ r /:: /.-

l 

-; I .. ? 

.:= 4.2.4-731 
--- d/,r'/_.7/":- .........
 ... / 

\­

_._­

, -' " '-'­ -

~., ;}//. 

/ 

= 

,-; ;,' 

- -- -­~-----

,/ ~/:-:""'_/: r ;~

?::/ 

:)/ ::J(J'/3 T?~r. \ 

(0,0 lB6 rP!.fT~~.j

(0,00(''2.. TPf ToJ"./') 

--­.-. ,';;,~J

.,-,,"j 

'-'" ..../ 

/// ;/// /'?{. ~.

'v .:i 

:; , - .~, .... ,~:' :.-' 

-, 

,",..-.. '.. ,." _/ 

4.2.4-732
 
r, ~15 / /6 ~:"'1­

J 

c4.2.4-733
 
i 

c~\ DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

RECEIVED HEADQUARTERS OGDEN AIR LOGISTICS CENTER (AFLCl 

HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH 84056-5990 

SEP 'O,6J991 

4 SEP 1991 Al~~;' J 

Mr F. Burnell Cordner, Executive Secretary 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Division of Air Quality 

1950 W North Temple 

Salt Lake City UT 84114-4820 

Re~ Notice of Intent to Construct Industrial Wastewater 

Treatment Plant Sludge Dryers, Bldg 577 

Dear Mr Cordner 

Building 577 had two electric batch sludge dryers. These sources 

were not permitted. We replaced these electric dryers with 

continuous gas fired sludge dryers. Technical information and 

emission rates from these dryers is attached. 

If this office can provide additional information, please cfeel 

free to contact Jay Gupta at 777 6917. 

JAMES R. VAN ORMAN 1 Atch
 

Director 01 Environmental Management Notice of Intent to Construct
 

4.2.4-734 

A:::'C- COMBAT STRENGTH THROUGH LOGISTICS 
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSTRUCT 

1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 

Sludge from the Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant 

Clarifier is pumped to sludge holding tanks in sludge drying 

building 577. Raw sludge is treated with lime and pumped to 

filter press for dewatering to 70 percent solids. Dewatered 

sludge is then fed to sludge dryers feed hoppers via a dump 

trolley. $ludge is dried to 5-10 percent moisture in JWI Model 

J360G continuous moving belt gas fired sludge dryers at a 

temperature of about -550°F. Dried granular sludge is emptied 

into a dumpster via a - sc-rew conveyor for disposal. There are two 

continuous gas fired sludge dryers. Off gas from the dryers i~

treated in venturi scrubbers before being exhausted to the 

atmosphere. Manufacturers' bulletin on dryers is Atch 1. 

Equipment schematic is Atch 2. Design data and exhaust gas flow 

rate calculations are as follows: 

Data Each Dryer (Two Required) : 

working capacity - water removal rate - 188 Lbs/hr 

Heat source - Gas 

Heat rate - 400,000 BTU/hr 

Natural gas heating value - 1,000 BTU/SCF 

Gas consumption - 400 SCFH 

Operating temperature - 550'-6000F 

Water rate to Venturi Scrubber - 2-4 GPM 

Water pressure - 40-50 PSIG 

Venturi Scrubber pressure drop - 5-8" w.e. 

Exhaust Gas Flow Rate and Moisture Balance: 

Water evaporation rate - 188 Lbs/hr 

Moisture content of sludge - 30% 

Filter Press 

Moisture content of sludge - 5% 

exiting dryer 

Water in wet sludge entering dryer - 188 X 1.05 = 197.4 

Lbs/hr 

Bone dry sludge - 70/30 X 197.4 

460.6 Lbs/hr 

Wet sludge entering dryer - 460.6 + :97.~

658 Los /:-.~

Water in sludge leaving dryer - 197.4 - 188 9.4 

Lbs/hr 

Sludge	 leaving dryer - 460.6 + 9.4 = 

470 Lbs/hr 

4.2.4-735 

r/j ::f 
Gas Volume Leaving Dryer: 

P, atmosphere -	 12.42 PSiA 

Products of combustion from Natural Gas (15% excess air): 

Standard Volume	 - Factor S X MM BTU/hr input X 

1/60 

Factor S for Natural Gas - 11,990 

Standard volume - 11,990 X 0.4 X 1/60 = 79.93 

SCFM 

Temperature correction - (460 + 550)/~60 + 60) = 1. 942 

Pressure correction - 1 + (Altitude/1,000 X .0375) 

- 1 + (4,500/1,000 X .0375) = 

1.169 . 

Actual volume - 79.93 X 1.942 X 1.169 

- 181.4 ACFM @ 550op, 12.42 

PSiA 

Evaporation - 188 Lbs/hr 

- 188 Lbs/hr X Lb Mole/18.02 

Lb X 379 SCF/Lb Mole X 

Hr/60 Min 

- 65.9 SCFM 

Actual Volume - 65.9 X 1.942 X 1.169 = 

149.6 ACFM 

Total	 gas leaving dryer - 181.4 + 149.6 = 331 ACFM @ 

550°F, 12.42 PSiA 

Gas volume leaving Venturi Scrubber: 

Dry Gas	 - 79.93 SCFM 

- 79.93 SCF/Min X Lb Mole/ 

379 SCF X 29 Lb/Lb Mole X 

60 Min/hr 

- 366.9 Lb/hr 

Inlet gas humidity (H) - 188/366.9 = 0.51 Lb Water 

Vapor/Lb Dry Air
 

Prom Pschyrometeric Chart @ - 550°F H = 0.51
 

Dry bulb temp
 

Adiabatic Saturation temp
 

(Tsat) 

Saturated Volume - 48 cu ft/Lb dry air 

- 48 X 366.9/60 = 293.5 ACFM 

Discharge Volume, each dryer: 293 ACFM @ 184°F 

2. AIR EMISSIONS: 

The plume comprises mostly of water vapor eV2.por2.'t.ed =~Ol':\
 

wet sludge. Some particulate a~d hydrocarbon emissions may also
 

be present. Emissions from natural gas combustion are
 

negligible. Base upon vendor testing of the smaller dryer on
 

metal hydroxide slUdge, a total particulate discharge of O.O~2
 

pounds per hour was observed.
 

4.2.4-736 
/ 

Assuming carryover to be 1% of bone dry solids, 

particulate in air stream entering venturi - 4.6 Lbs/hr 

Per vendor, venturi impactor scrubber - 95-98% 

efficiency 

Particulate emission rate 4.6 X .05 = 0.23 

Lb/hr 

PM-IO emission rate - 0.1 Lb/hr 

From sludge composition, metals content - 13% 

Metals emission rate - .23 X .13 = 

0.03 Lb/hr 

Hydrocarbon emissions: Some hydrocarbon emissions may be present 

depending on oil and grease content of wet sludge. A preliminary 

test of stack gas showed hydrocarbon concentration of 

approximately 500 PPMV. 

EXhaust gas from each dryer - 79.93 + 65.9 = 145.83 SCFM 

Hydrocarbon emission rate - 500/106 X 145.83 = .0729 SCFM 

Hydrocarbon emissions - .0729 X 16/379 X 60 

(as methane)
 

- 0.18 Lb/hr
 

These emission rates are estimates only. 

3. AIR CLEANING DEVICES: 

r 

Particulate emissions will be controlled by venturi impactor 

scrubber and cyclonic separator. Removal efficiency of 95-98% is 

achieved with 6-8" W.C. pressure drop across the scrubber. 

4. EMISSION POINTS: 

Two stacks each 8" diameter will exhaust approximately 300 

cubic feet per minute. Point of discharge is approximately 30 

feet above grade. 

5. SAMPLING POINTS: 

No sampling points are provided. 

6. OPERATING SCHEDULE: 

Normally, dryers are operated during the day shift. 

However, in the event of sludge back-up, they may be operated in 

other shifts. 

4.2.4-737
 

•••••• 

Continuous J-MatesTM.••• The Final Step 

.-in Metal HydroxideSludge Volume Reduction 

The J-Mate, by JWI. has been designed to take over 

where filter presses, vacuum filters and centrifuges leave 

off. While these mechanical dewatering units can reduce sludge volume by upto 20:1, a substantial amount 

of water still remains in the material. The J-Mate units use 

gas or electric infrared heatfor rapid, effective water 

removal which results in reduced sludge volume ... changing the material to a dry. granularform. The result 

is a further volume reduction ofabout 4: 1. One fourth the 

waste volume ... one fourth the handling and disposal 

costs. So effective is the J-Mate. that 6 month paybacks 

ore possible (depending on local disposal costs). 

Features and Benefits: 

• Payback within 6 months possible." 

• Designed specifically for metal hydroxide sludge. 

• Installation flexibility. Simple loading and unloading.
 

No additional labor required.
 

r -. '11v automatic processing cycle. Minimal operator 

,- tion reqUired. 

•ess steel construction of all internal wetted parts in . trig chamber. All other portsare carborl steel-sand 

ulasted, and polyurethane primed and pointed. 

• Ruggedly built for continuous use and long seNice life. 

• Sludge volume reduction ranges by a factor of about 

2:1 to.5:1 

• Highly efficient infrared heaters keep energy
 

costata minimum.
 

• Available in either LP or natural gas.
 

Smaller models available in electric.
 

• Extruded filter cake for maximum weight and volume
 

reduction with a minimum of BTU's.
 

• No direct flame torching matena/. 

• No material build up or clogging problems. 

• Electronic ignition used ... no pilot light. 

•	 All models include a stainless steel venturi-type wet
 

scrubber to maintain high air quality.
 

• A~l,j::: oerlormonce is 0 fu"'CtlOr"l of IOCOI energy
 

O:lC':: SOOSOi costs ona lnitlOI sludge sallas co~cenrrOTlon
 

The J·Press'f Continuous J-Mate' Combination 

The J-Mate. used in conjunction with JWl's filter press (or other brand of filter 

oressesl orovides a caoobil'h; t~ c-:o::;...::.s ;:; meta, hyoroxiae slurry by a rarlO ot 

SO: 1. E:ghty barrels ot slurry, fJiterec one dewatered In a tiller cress is redusee ::: 

'our carrels of filter caKe. While this represents a substantial reduction In waSTe 

volume. even greater savings can be realized With a J-Mate Since 60 to 80% of 

rem!";.... material is still water. These four barrels of dewatered sludge. when proSE' rough the Continuous J-Mate con be further redUCed to only one Darrel ..c- clular, moisture free material for handling and disposal. The dumpster 

aceiving the filter cake from the J-Press can also be used to transfer and 

( Ihe cake into the J-Mate. Ifdesiree. drums can be handled in a similar 

",-- .;1. Thus. no additional labor is needed for waste disposal. Labor may even 

:>e reduced due to the smaller volumes of end product. 

one J\M Dewatenng combination ... an 80: 1 reduction in your waste disposal 

:l:oblemc 

Eighty Borrels Filter Press Four Barrels 

4.2.4-739 

Receiver Hepper: Includes cake breaker 

bars WhiCh facilitates material continually 

being fea to extruder 

loodlng System: Three mounting locatlOf1S available. The 

optional hyClraulicallyoperated looding system is designea to till the J·Mate receiving hopperbyoufomaticoII, 

raising andemptying drums ordumpsters. The drums or 

dumpsters are used to tronsportSludge from ttle mechanical dewatering devices to the Continuous J-Mate. 

Extruder System: Receives filter cake whiCh 

has been brOken down bv the bridge 

breaker In fhe receiver hOpper The wIper 

blades force the sludge through holes In 

the stamless steel drum. This prOduces 

pelleT-like particles with moximum surface 

orea lor drymg. The ex/rudeamatenal foils 

onto 0 continuous sTamless steel mesh con· 

veyor for passage under a se(Jes ofhighly 

eftlc/enr mfrared heatdrymg elements 
Heater Options: Allenergy for drying in Ihe J·Mate comes from infrared healmg 

elements. Heating energy opl,ons ore natural orLP gas on all models wilh elec· 

Iric available on ModelsJ·120E. J·180EandJ·360E. Ambienfairis drown 

through the heal chamber by the ton mounted on the outletatthe wetscruooer. 

The J-Mate heatcl1amber andscrubber are protected from higl1 temperalure 

levels byon exhaustOlf temperature monitor. Infrared heat is known 10be the 

mostefficient source ofheatavailable for drying applications. 

Stolnle$S Sleel Construction: All inrernol 

parts In orymg cnomoer exoosed 10 wer 

sludge are STeinless sleel for corrosion 

res/slonce ona long service Me. 

Discharge System: As Ihe moleflOI reaches Ine 

deSlreo reduction Idryness}. the ary, granular 

material is empTlee mTo a oog. :;orrel or (Jumpsler 

fardtsposal 

Specifications 

A1r-Hondllno fqulpment: EveryJ·Mate uml is supplied wilh a Single 

speed, wet scrubber. Ail extloustoir tram the J-Mate enrers the 

scrubber where the partIculate maNer IS combined for removal 

with on atomiZed stream atwoter. The scruooer uses no mOying 

parts and utiliZes tl1e classic high-energy ventufl type scrubber 

design. Stojnle~steel consfTucfion anO Slfr,ple design contlibules 

lolong·term. highlyreliobleseNlCe. A 1-2 GPM blawdown stream 

is over98 %efficient! The blower. mounted on lop of the scrubber 

, 'AlOnc.,t'\Q cooocr.-.- ­ ... 'NOter Rem?vOl ROle :It. 

remoyes solids 10 tl1e waste treormenl SYSTem. The scruboer 

package. provides 0/1 at the alfmovement through Ihe 

entire J-Mote svstem 

Unit Includes:. HQPPel'. Cake Bleaker • Extruder. Drive Gearmotor • Wet SCrubber 

[eXhaust ducting notincluded). Control Panel. 

Prewired with all Operational Controls. Infrared 

HeatChamber Mounted on Rugged Frome • Dried Sludge Unloading Chute. One (1) Copy 

of on InstaliationlOperationlMaintenance Mon· 

ual.• Moving StainlessSteel Grating Type Ben 

Optional Equipment:. Dumpsters. Barrel 

Loader. DumpsterLooder. One Way Disposable Bags. Optional Hydraulic 

Dumping Mechanism for Dumpster. Special 

Hopper Designs and Sizes • Custom Support 

Structures Available to Elevate Filter Press for 

Direct Disposal into J-Mate. 

J120G J12GE 

:::-'·:.,Gas :..... .....eo· SOurce Gas 

ConlTol COnsole: Provides finger-tip controlatall 

J·Mote tunctions: including extruder teed rate. 

dryingchaml:>er l:>eft rote, svstem on-offandmain 

disconnect. 

Power ReoulremenTS ­

I~Clvall'~ Dump ur:· 

'30\,306OCY 20A :.~,,» eo"'Y DUty, long life Motor: TE;C IncJuslflolmolor L8Qv 30 60CY lOA ~~~ :lOA ..~: :;." , '" 65A 'ovldes years of momtenonce tree operalion. 

::\~~ICHe-ol

""IIO"...O~ 31.5KW 

Gas 5..Jfne~ Rcrilng 125.000fffiJ . 200.000 BTU 

. ..:'~ -.' 

........ "200CfH ':; .~CfH

Gcs CO-.SoJ~OflOI"l

lOO~

14GPH ,,, UGI'H.· _.:3USPH 

-----. 

I SPIol
 

Scruooer Drel;'"!
 

170" 170" 

46" 46" 

73' 78" 

~Ig:"l~ ($:'1IDprng)
 

~Ncmc~LJ::)
 

10.7 cu. ft. lO.7cu.ll g.::.,;.

':""~~

175 175 ··';"~·i·

·70" 

"78" 

f,:'<~~tls. r'--··- ..•. 

MCllenciS 01 ConslfUC1<Cn' 304 SS CortlOn Slee\. PotY\l,etnone Mntsn 

J·Mote One Barrel • $eMce 10 De eJe1f!rm.ne<1 OV lacel elecmcol coae reQulremenrs,
 

"50sea on us"'g 2125 BTU 10 r.",ove 110 01 H,O BTU reoultemenrmeyvcryWirn mOlenaIS 4.2.4-740
 HOT: .Io'OC'~9CZ5comD()"lelY5"COf':'l:-"MmFUOf'I(JlRrflliOUl1e.'NIf'7lS
__Figure _______________ your disposal costs and savings with these charts. -=--__0 

Annual Generation (Tons) 

$200.,.--,----...------------,------r-------, 

2:1 

-

l); $1 001-----+-----t---:7"!-:....---::::OO~__::7'<J/!!::--~,.;....:~---_:
 

8.. Weight
 6 Reduction 

Ratio
 

ro
 

;:e S50+-----~l""S~~;..rc::::-----+-----+-----i

C 

< 

O+------I-------+----f------+------I 

o S20 $40 $60 $80 $100 

Annual Savings (SOOO) 

=-JII r=z::n--,--.':
 

4.2.4-741 

JWI, Inc. J 2155 112th Ave.
 

Holland, Michigan 49424 U.S.A.
 

616·m·9011 J FAX 61&-n2-4516 Printed In U.S.A.
 

1-800-245-3006 JWI 01 51905M
 

800 1000 1200

Use lOP figure to determine 

Annual Disoosal Costs. 

Bottom figure will show your 

annual savings with a J-Mat",. 

600 

Annual 

Disposal 

Costs 

200 400

$250 H;-\--\--J~-~-:lk_----+----'------i---~

c 

$200 +-+-\--'\-l~....--~-~.---__+-----'------+-------1

iii 

o

(,) $150 +-+-4----Jk--~*__+-....3oo",.---__+~...."...-----_+_-------"

ro 

III 

o

lir $1 00 +-_-\--_~-~.,__~~-=__-+_-..=-d_---==-..l----.....; 

o 

$300rT..:.r,,:.....rT-r-T-..:r--....,..--------,---~---,..-----

')O+-----+----~----___+---,,£:-l--~---

3:1 

4:1 

5:1 
--

RECOUUENDED EQJJST VENT 

USE 6" Ov... PIPE WITH , 00- RECOUUENDED
 

lDlGTIi Of" RUN. WIlH
 

OPTlOH ONLY. (PIPE BY
 

CUSTO~ER TO FURNISH
 

SERVlCE IN ACCORDANCE
 

APPUCf<.BLE lOCAl N-lD
 

CODES.
 j 

PIPING INSTAUATION 

SCRUBBrn 

OTHERS) 

ELECTRICAL 

WTTH 

NATIONAL 

1-------- 10a.00 ----­

'\J -

-

\ I I 

~~

~~

-

- 1------------- 110..00­ ­

MODEL A B C D E F WORJOHG 

C!oPN:lr( fT. 3/HR 

HOPPER \IOf...lJWE: 

(CUBIC Fm) 

0f'1l0fW... 

HOPf'£R VOlJJWE 

wecHT 

(UlS.) 

120 ~.oo 25.00 .'.00 31.00 ~.OO 30.00 1 - 1.5 10.7 24.7 3000 

'180 52.00 31.00 47.00 37.00 ~.OO 311.00 1.5 - 3 13 2e 3700 

3llO 52.00 48.00 102.00 SS.OO eg.oo 54.00 3 - 6 17 33 4400 

4.2.4-742
 
..J 

I I 

~O

~C~~,\' n.~!'!..f'Oott..V"-' .~"...., ..... ­

vv..... I t:R OR e.-AA£L 

WI'ni ONE OF THREE 

UOUIffiNG POSlTlONS AVAlL'BLE 

• NOTE: R)GHf twlO DU1lP LOCATION HOT AV~u:.
 

ON WOO€l. J-UATES.
 

rs: 

• 

MODElS J-120, J-1aO, &: J-360 

8..ECTRlCAL CONSUMTlON (GAS FIRED) 

[]RlV£ MOTORS 2.wJ.3PH. ~OV. 3PH. 

120 20AMPS 10Al,lPS 

UODEl...= 180 20AMPS 1OAMPS 

360 30AMPS 1SAMPS 

El.£CTRIC HEAT MODELS (+SOV. 3PH.) 

MODEL: 120: SOAMPS 

180: 65AMPS 

~INIMUM CPS REQUIREMENTS (GAS FlRm ONLY) 

NATIJRAL GAS SUPPLY 0 r -2f!' W.C. 

MODEl..; 120: 125 crn (125.000 EmJ~ 180: 200 CFH (200.000 BW 

360: 400 CFH (4D0.000 BTU 

PROPANE CPS SUPPLY: 

MODEl..;	 120: 42 ern. 1.1 GPH
 

lao: 68 CFH, 1.9 GPH
 

:':'C. ;35 ":Fi-i. ...).1 CPH
 

114.00 llc.OO 

-----;.--- IQ.OO --~

CONTlNUOUS J-....UE 

G.A. 

4.2.4-743
 

J-MATE 9/89 10 

AT£U-2