alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(LOGO)

ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE



                                March 31, 1998

I, DANIEL L. PERL,  Chairman,  President and CEO of Life Bank (the  "Servicer"),
pursuant to the provisions of the Section Servicing Agreement dated September 1,
1997, (the "Agreement"),  by and among Norwest Bank,  Minnesota,  Life Financial
Home Loan Owner Trust 1997-2 and the Servicer, do hereby certify as follows:

(i)      the Servicer has fully complied with the provisions of the Agreement

(ii)     a  review  of  activities  of the Servicer  during the  preceding  year
         and  of the  Servicer's  performance  under the Agreement has been made
         under my supervision; and

(iii)    to the best of my knowledge,  based on the  review referred  to in (ii)
         above, the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of  its obligations, duties and
         responsibilities    under   the   Agreement  throughout  the  preceding
         quarterly period,  and unless otherwise specified on Schedule I hereto,
         no Servicer Default exists.



         Capitalized  terms used but not  otherwise  defined  herein  shall have
meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  executed this  certificate  this 31st day of March
1998.

                                                       SERVICER:
                                                       By:/s/Daniel L. Perl
                                                       Daniel L. Perl
                                                       Chairman, President & CEO


                                    LIFE BANK
 A LIFE FINANCIAL COMPANY 10540 MAGNOLIA AVE., SUITE B, RIVERSIDE, CA 92505-1814
 (888) 388-5433   (909) 637-4000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Southwest Oregon PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on October 31, 2000 in North Bend, Oregon, at the Coos Bay Bureau of Land Management Office at 1300 Airport Lane. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and continue until 4:30 p.m. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Province Implementation Monitoring 2000; (2) Public Comment; (3) Province Large Wood Implementation; (4) Rogue Basin Technical Team Update; (5) BLM Third-Year Monitoring Evaluation; and (6) Current issues as perceived by Advisory Committee members.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Roger Evenson, Province Advisory Committee Coordinator, USDA, Forest Service, Umpqua National Forest, 2900 NW Stewart Parkway, Roseburg, Oregon 97470, phone (541) 957-3344.

Dated: October 16, 2000.

Don Ostby,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 00-26975 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Exhibit 23.1
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  (1)
    
    Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-132155 and 333-139134) pertaining to the 1997
Equity Incentive Plan and the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan of Cardica, Inc.,(2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-148196) pertaining to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan
of Cardica, Inc., and(3)
    
    Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-144443 and 333-146708) of Cardica, Inc. and in the
related Prospectuses,
  /s/ Ernst & Young LLPPalo Alto, CaliforniaSeptember 5, 2008
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretory of Transportation 

# Memorandum

Subject: Notice of Comm...Luv...... L...,L DOT-OST-2010-001 Date: U.S.-Haneda '--'VHH ..._._••L._... From: The Secretary Reply to Attn. of: To: In accordance with Department rules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporting the following communication. On October 5, 2012, during a call with Senator Orrin Hatch ofUtah, the Senator expressed his support for the application ofDelta Air Lines to operate between Seattle and Tokyo's Haneda International Airport. I informed the Senator that, while I appreciated his interest in this case, I could not comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active consideration by the Department. Please place this memorandum in the appropriate file and in the Docket.

CC: Senator Orrin Hatch
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, included
herein, dated January 11, 2002, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2001 and 2000 and for the years then ended in the two Registration Statements on
Form S-8 for the "Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan" and
"Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. Employees' Retirement Plan" filed by the Company
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 7, 1998 and July 10, 1998,
respectively.


                                          /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Oak Brook, Illinois
March 27, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26973]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NORTHEAST DAIRY COMPACT COMMISSION


Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Northeast Dairy Compact Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Compact Commission will hold its regular monthly meeting 
to consider matters relating to administration and enforcement of the 
price regulation, including the reports and recommendations of the 
Commission's standing Committees.

DATES: The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, November 1, 
2000.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Centennial Inn, Armenia 
White Room, 96 Pleasant Street, Concord, New Hampshire.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Smith, Executive Director, 
Northeast Dairy Compact Commission, 34 Barre Street, Suite 2, 
Montpelier, VT 05602. Telephone (802) 229-1941.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7256.

    Dated: October 16, 2000.
Daniel Smith,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 00-26973 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1650-01-M
<Page>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                SUBSIDIARIES OF NATIONAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC.
          (Each Subsidiary is wholly-owned, directly or indirectly, by
                       National Equipment Services, Inc.)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                    State or Jurisdiction of
                                                                   Subsidiary's Incorporation
Subsidiary                                                               or Organization
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                <C>
NES Equipment Services Corp. f/k/a Falconite, Inc.                             IL
NES Indiana Partners, Inc.                                                     IN
NES Traffic Safety L.P.                                                        IN
NES Equipment Rental L.P.                                                      DE
Rebel Studio Rentals, Inc.                                                     CA
NES Shoring Acquisition, Inc.                                                  DE
NES Partners, Inc. f/k/a Plank Management, Inc.                                TX
NES Companies L.P.                                                             DE
NES Rental Services LLC                                                        DE
NES Equipment Services, Inc. (Canada)                                        Canada
NES Management Service Corp.                                                   IL
Falconite Rebuild Center, Inc.                                                 KY
</Table>
HPV4 CHEMICAL DATA ADEQUACY REVIEW

The documents contained in this Data Set are data adequacy reviews for the 23 High 

Production Volume chemicals listed for testing in the Test Rule for: Certain High Production 

Volume Chemicals; Test Rule and Significant New Use Rule; Fourth Group of Chemicals
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as 

State ex rel. Dawson v. Gentzler Tool & Die Corp., Slip Opinion No. 2014-Ohio-3957.] 

NOTICE

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in 

an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested 

to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 

65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or 

other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be 

made before the opinion is published. 

SLIP OPINION NO. 2014-OHIO-3957 

THE STATE EX REL. DAWSON, APPELLANT, v. GENTZLER TOOL & DIE CORP.

ET AL., APPELLEES. 

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, 

 it may be cited as State ex rel. Dawson v. Gentzler Tool & Die Corp., 

Slip Opinion No. 2014-Ohio-3957.] 

Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 

(No. 2012-1814—Submitted August 19, 2014—Decided September 17, 2014.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, 

No. 11AP-1017, 2012-Ohio-4418. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons 

stated in the opinion of the court of appeals. 

__________________ 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,

FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

 Richard L. Williger Co., L.P.A., and Richard L. Williger, for appellant. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

 Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Lydia M. Arko, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. 

________________________
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00274

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 360th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 360

- 703239

- 21

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### O CTAVIOUS 

### W ILLIAMS 

### , J R



### . , Appellant

V



### .
P AYTON 

### W ILLIAMS 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On July 13, 2022, and July 2 8 , 2022, we notified A ppellant, in accordance with

Texas R ule of A ppellate P rocedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless

A ppellant paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. Appellant ha s
not done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because A ppellant ha s not complied with a procedural requirement and the Texas Supreme Cou rt’s order of August 28, 2015, 1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f). Appellant must pay all costs of th is app eal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: August 18, 2022

1 See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- District Litigation , Misc. Docket No

. 15

- 9158 (Au g. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

BRYANT C. JONES,

Petitioner, 

v. 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 

Respondent. 

____________________ 

2010-3074 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in 

Case No. CH0752090905-I-1. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

GREGORY T. MITCHELL, Law Office of Gregory T. 

Mitchell, of Homewood, Illinois, argued for petitioner. 

DAVID S. BROOKS, Attorney, Office of the General 

Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, 

DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were 

JAMES M. EISENMANN, General Counsel, and KEISHA 

DAWN BELL, Deputy General Counsel. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 
 PER CURIAM (BRYSON, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 2, 2010 

—————————— 

Date 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

—————————— 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk
Order entered January 27 , 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00824

- CR

DELONZE ALLEN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judi cial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F21

- 34145

- N

O RDER

The State’s motion for extension of time to file the State’s brief is

GRANTED , and we ORDER the State’s brief received with the motion filed as of

the date of this order.

/s / DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.1

Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

I, Gilad Gat, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of GSV, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based   on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures  to be designed  under my  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)[intentionally omitted];

(c)Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures  and presented in this report my  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's  fourth fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably
likely to materially  affect,  the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial  reporting,  to the small business  issuer's auditors and to the audit
committee  of the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2007


                                By:/s/ Gilad Gat
                                   -------------
                                   Gilad Gat
                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

     Exhibit 23.1

     Consent of Independent Public Accountants

     Independent Accountants' Consent

     The Board of Directors
     TenFold Corporation:

        We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
     No. 333-79053 on Form S-8 of TenFold Corporation and in the registration
     statement No. 333-55910 on Form S-8 of TenFold Corporation, of our report
     dated April 9, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of TenFold
     Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
     related results of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and
     comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the
     three-year period ended December 31, 2000, and related schedule, which
     report appears in the December 31, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of
     TenFold Corporation.

        Our report dated April 3, 2001, contains an explanatory paragraph that
     states that the Company suffered a significant loss from operations during
     the year ended December 31, 2000, has a substantial deficit in working
     capital and stockholder's equity at December 31, 2000, had negative cash
     flow from operations for the year ended December 31, 2000 and is involved
     in significant legal proceedings that raise substantial doubt about its
     ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial
     statements and related financial statement schedule do not include any
     adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

                                                  KPMG LLP


     Salt Lake City, Utah
     April 9, 2001
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

DARLENE M. BROUGHTON
, Petitioner

,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD
, Respondent

.

______________________

2014

- 3063

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF

- 0752

- 13

- 0101 -I- 1.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R
The Department of the Veterans Affairs (“Department”) moves to reform the official caption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) as the proper respondent, and to set the due date for the Board’s brief as 21 days from the date of disposition of this motion.

Pursua nt to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is desi gnated as the respondent when the Board's decision co ncerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The Case: 14-3063 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 03/12/2014BROUGHTON v. MSPB 2

employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Broughton’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.
Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion s to reform the caption are granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.
(2) The Board should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s2 1 Case: 14-3063 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 03/12/2014
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.A

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ending March 31, 2003, of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John W. Somerhalder II, Chairman of the Board, certify (i) that
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                              /s/ JOHN W. SOMERHALDER II
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                  John W. Somerhalder II
                                                  Chairman of the Board
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)

                                          June 20, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and will be retained by
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.