alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       9,973,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,026,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                   231,635
<INVENTORY>                                 14,774,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,826,287
<PP&E>                                       4,866,115
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,842,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,251,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,902,486
<BONDS>                                     10,981,916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,259
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,634,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,251,133
<SALES>                                     17,692,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,312,109
<CGS>                                        9,537,348
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,537,348
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,621,792
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                70,407
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             434,025
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,152,969
<INCOME-TAX>                                   809,026
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,343,943
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,343,943
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29


</TABLE>
Table 2. Distribution of TIN Costs and Benchmarks - All TINs with 1+ EPs

5% 10%

Cost per Capita 137,694 $9,690 $7,778 $52 $1,999 $3,099

Specialty-Adjusted Benchmark

weighted by % EPs 137,694 $10,153 $7,890 $53 $2,274 $3,590

weighted by % Charges 137,694 $10,173 $7,884 $53 $2,277 $3,605

Specialty-Adjusted Cost per Capita

weighted by % EPs 137,694 $10,079 $1,026 $6,381 $7,677 $8,923

weighted by % Charges 137,694 $10,056 $1,069 $6,381 $7,677 $8,658

TIN Measure # TINs Mean StDev Min
25% 50% 75% 90% 95% 99%

$5,794 $8,860 $11,426 $15,525 $20,153 $37,804 $314,472

$6,437 $9,268 $11,815 $15,949 $20,574 $38,619 $322,778

$6,480 $9,288 $11,843 $15,938 $20,562 $38,660 $322,778

$9,792 $10,435 $10,702 $10,767 $10,993 $12,434 $14,064

$9,775 $10,438 $10,716 $10,767 $10,993 $12,506 $14,064

Percentiles

Max
**Exhibit 32.B****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ending June 30, 2005, of Tennessee Gas PipelineCompany (the “Company”) as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior VicePresident, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify(i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Greg G. Gruber           Greg G. Gruber *Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer* *and Treasurer* *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)*August 5, 2005A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Tennessee Gas PipelineCompany and will be retained by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
Note - EPS information has been prepared in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, and basic and diluted EPS have been
entered in place of primary and fully diluted, respectively.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>               1000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                30511
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         59026
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                           49115
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     143223
<PP&E>                                                98527
<DEPRECIATION>                                        45079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       218202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 66071
<BONDS>                                               35125
<COMMON>                                               2013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                           107697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         218202
<SALES>                                               92207
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      92207
<CGS>                                                 63292
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         63292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       10079
<INCOME-TAX>                                           3557
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    6553
<DISCONTINUED>                                          281
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                           6834
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .42
        

</TABLE>
### Contacts.With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  2/6/14 **Regional Airline Association** 2/6/14 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association**  **Robert Hackman** 2/6/14 **Airlines for America Robert Ireland**  2/6/14
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04690

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04690\04690_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04690\04690_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04690\04690_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04690\04690_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04690\04690_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04690\04690_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04690\Supplemental Documents\04690_SCHILLER FLY ASH BLOCK DIAGRAM 11x17.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04690\Supplemental Documents\04690_WB-1 SCHILLER DIAGRAM(11x17).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04690\Supplemental Documents\04690_WB-2 SCHILLER BLOCK DIAGRAM(11x17).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04690\Supplemental Documents\MAP-1 Schiller Station Facility Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04690\04690_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04690\04690_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

04690\Supplemental Documents\04690_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Filed 7/11/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2018 ND 163

Charles Bradford Odom, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20180089

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Bobbi L. Weiler, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Julie A. Lawyer, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Odom v. State

No. 20180089

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Charles Bradford Odom appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Odom argues the district court erred in denying his application because the recently amended N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23(1)(a)(2) is a change in substantive law that should be applied retrospectively in the interest of justice. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), see State v. Iverson, 2006 ND 193, ¶ 8, 721 N.W.2d 396 (holding a statute lessening punishment may not be applied retroactively to final convictions because it would constitute an invalid exercise by the Legislature of the executive pardoning power).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26981]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences (BIO) (1110).
    Date and Time:

November 16, 2000; 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
November 17, 2000; 8:30 a.m.-3 p.m.

    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 
1235, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Mary E. Clutter, Assistant Director, 
Biological Sciences, Room 605, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8400.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: The Advisory Committee for BIO provides 
advice, recommendations, and oversight concerning major program 
emphases, directions, and goals for the research-related activities 
of the divisions that make up BIO.
    Agenda: GPRA Performance Evaluation and Planning Discussion.

    Dated: October 16, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-26981 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### In the Matter of John Costa et al., Petitioners, against Robert C. Weaver, as State Rent Administrator, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

November 18, 1957.

*787
      *Edward J. McCann*for petitioners.

*Nathan Heller*for respondent.

Thomas E. Morrissey, Jr., J.

Proceeding to review the determination of respondent denying a certificate of eviction.

On April 26,1957 petitioners filed an application for a certificate of eviction to obtain possession of the tenant’s apartment for use and occupancy by their daughter, her husband and their two children, on the ground of an immediate and compelling necessity in that the building in which the daughter and her family presently resided had been condemned by the city for a school site and was to be demolished, and that title vested in the city on April 17, 1957. The tenant opposed the application on the ground that it was not made in good faith. On June 27, 1957 the local rent administrator denied the application on the ground that the landlords had failed to establish the existence of an immediate and compelling necessity, such denial being without prejudice to the renewal of the application after the city had taken definite steps to remove the landlords’ daughter. The landlords’ protest was denied on September 18, 1957, almost five months after the application was filed. It is thus seen that considerable time elapsed between the filing of the application and the determination thereof. In the meantime, the landlords’ daughter and her family must reside in a building which has been condemned and the city may serve a removal notice at any time. The fact is the building has been condemned, title is vested in the city and the occupants of said building may be ordered to remove at the city’s pleasure. In such case petitioners must-institute a new proceeding, which, notwithstanding respondent’s indication that it would lie expedited, would take some time to process through the local rent administrator and thereafter respondent on a protest, probable application for a review to this court and the possible appeal from a denial of such review by this court. Furthermore, petitioners would be unable to institute summary proceedings to oust the tenant until all of ’the legal proceedings were completed with the tenant possibly obtaining a stay of the warrant of dispossess.

*788Under all the circumstances, the determination of respondent is arbitrary and capricious. The petition is granted and respondent directed to issue a certificate of eviction to petitioners.

Settle order on notice.
#### Luzadder, Appellant, *v.*Stark, Appellee.

(No. 27993

Decided February 7, 1940.)

*Mr. Willard D. Campbell,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Scott S Scott*and *Messrs. Hauxhurst, Inglis, Sharp $ Cull,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development 
(#1199).
    Date and Time: October 24, 2000: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; 
October 25, 2000: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Hilton Arlington and Towers, 950 North Stafford Street, 
Arlington, VA 22203.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Larry S. Scadden, Program Directors, Human 
Resource Development Division, Room 815, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 
(703) 292-8636.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate formal proposals submitted to the 
Program for Persons with Disabilities.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 16, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-26984 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Judy Bailey, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of Dewanda Bailey, an Infant, Appellant, v Gary Bottomley, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (White, J.), entered November 30, 1989 in Montgomery County, which granted defendant Gary Bottomley’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against him.

Upon the evidence before it, which was sufficient on this summary judgment motion *(see, James v Gloversville Enlarged School Dist.,*155 AD2d 811, 812), Supreme Court properly determined that defendant Gary Bottomley was not liable for the injuries to plaintiff’s daughter caused by Melissa Green. Absent a special relationship between Bottomley and Green *(see, Purdy v Public Adm’r of County of Westchester,*72 NY2d 1, 8) or a showing that he had undertaken a duty to supervise the children’s activities *(see, Nadeau v Stack,*87 AD2d 943, 944), Bottomley’s liability is limited to his status as a landowner *(see, Basso v Miller,*40 NY2d 233, 241; *Gordon v Harris,*86 AD2d 948). However, even if Bottomley breached his duty by failing to properly maintain the handrails on the porch steps, Green’s intervening act was sudden and unforeseeable, thereby relieving Bottomley of any liability he may have had *(see, O’Britis v Peninsula Golf Course,*143 AD2d 123, 125).

Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
#### LANDRUM v. STATE.

No. 23938.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 25, 1948.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of carrying a pistol and assessed a fine of $100.

The record is brought forward without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The proceedings appear regular and nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<MULTIPLIER>       1000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             67305
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      52907
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                        48809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  172617
<PP&E>                                            104476
<DEPRECIATION>                                     45207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    253440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              81033
<BONDS>                                            29050
<COMMON>                                            2016
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                        133786
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      253440
<SALES>                                           298261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  298261
<CGS>                                             203013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     203013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (169)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    33528
<INCOME-TAX>                                       11937
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                21591
<DISCONTINUED>                                     11760
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       33351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       2.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       2.07
        

</TABLE>
#### In re Wysong.

(No. 27842

Decided December 20, 1939.)

*Mr. Joseph W. Sharis,*for appellant, Drewey H. Wysong.

*Mr. Harry P. Jeffrey*and *Mr. Robert G. Knee,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said causé.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, J J., concur.
**MP D**  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 2 - 0 543 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. JUSTIN GUY ZENO SHAWN WOLF MASON ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including February 16 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court January 11 2024

01/11/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0543
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.A


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2004, of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John W. Somerhalder II, Chairman of the Board and Director,
certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ John W. Somerhalder II
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John W. Somerhalder II
                                           Chairman of the Board and Director
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

                                           May 14, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and will be retained by Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.