alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.a
                                CERTIFICATIONS

I, Douglas A. Starrett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The L.S. Starrett
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
(b) [Intentionally Omitted]
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial report;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date:  November 4, 2004             /s/  Douglas A. Starrett
                                    Douglas A. Starrett
                                    Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              14
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         36
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,373
<PP&E>                                           4,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,325
<BONDS>                                            984
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,836
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,474
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,346
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    126
<INCOME-TAX>                                        49
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 77
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        77
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR
ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# OAR Box 1413 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 109)11-1-11 0 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/9/20083:11:25PM Sheet 109of 114 P. 1Burea

uo f Labo r Statistic s Dat a 

# a-i-no P. 2 http://146.142.4.24/cgi-bin/surveymos t



### Dat a extracte

don : January

20,200 0 (05:1 6 PM )

Produce r Pric e Index-Commoditie s Serie s Catalog : Serie s I D : WPUSOP290 0 No t Seasonall yAdjuste d 

# |3A N* 9

# ?m

EPAAI RDOCKE T Grou p : Stag e o f processin g Ite m: Intermediat e material s les s foo d an denerg y Bas e Dat e : 820 0 Data : Year , 1990 , 1991 , 1992 , 1993 , 1994 , 1995 , 1996 , 1997 , 1998 , 1999 , 2000 , Jan,Feb,Mar,Apr,May,Jun,Jul,Aug,Se p 120.0,120.0,120.3,120.6,120.7,120. 5 122.4,122.2,121.8,121.6,121.4,121.4 121.1,121.4,121.6,121.8,121.9,122. 0 122.9,123.5,123.9,124.1,123.8,123.7 124.8,124.9,125.2,125.4,125.7,126. 3 132.6,133.8,134.4,135.2,135.6,1 3 5. 7 134.8,134.4,134.1,133.9,134.1,134. 0 134.1,134.2,134.2,134.2,134.2,134.2 134.3,134.2,134.1,134.1,133.9,133. 6 131.9,131.8,131.9,132.1,132.5,132. 9 N o dat a availabl e fo r thi s year.,, , Oct , 120 . 121 . 122 . 123 . 126 . 136 . 133 . 134 . 133 . 133 . Nov,Dec , 6,120.8 , 1,120.9 , 1,122.2 , 6,123.8 , 7,127.3 , 1,136.1 , 6,133.6 , 2,134.2 , 6,133.4 , 4,133.7 ,

An n 121 . 121 . 122 . 123 . 128 . 136 . 133 . 134 . 133 . 133 . 4,122.0 , 0,121.0 , 4,122.3 , 9,124.0 , 3,129.2 , 1,135.8 , 9,133.6 , 3,134.2 , 1,132.7 , 7(P ) ,13 4 12 2

12 1 12 2 12 4 13 0 13 5 13 3 13 4 132. 4 • 2(P ) ,12 2 ,12 1 ,12 2 ,12 4 ,13 0 ,13 5 ,13 3 ,13 4 ,13 2 ,13 4 0,120. 9 0,121. 4 4,122. 0 4,123. 8 .9,127. 1 1,135 . 9,134 . 3,134 . 1,133 . .4(P),134 . IIIII I Preliminary . Al l indexe s ar e subjec t t o revisio nfou r month s afte r origina l pu b

= 1= ia. o _EG.CC C 

### Produce rPric eIndexe s Hom ePag e

DataHom ePag e

BL S Hom ePag e Bureauof Labor Statistics catron_b(a),bls. sov

1 o f 1 1/20/005:1 5 P M
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, James
M. Papada, III, Chief Executive Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 25,
      2009 (the “Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
  and





(2)
            information
      contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Technitrol,
      Inc.





Date:November 4,
      2009
            /s/
      James M. Papada, IIIJames
      M. Papada, III







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be retained by
Technitrol, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.





This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of
the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00302

- CR

Robert Len WHITE

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR10291

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 25 , 2018.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
#### Lester C. SHAW, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 22583.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 9, 1943.

John L. Poulter, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for murder, punishment assessed being five years in the penitentiary. Appellant has filed his affidavit advising the court that he does not desire to further prosecute his appeal, and requests that same he dismissed, and it is accordingly so ordered.
#### The State, ex rel. Messenger, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio.

(No. 27715

Decided November 29, 1939.)

*Mr. G. W. Schwemer*and *Mr. E. B. Wetherill,*for relator.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. E. P. Felker,*for respondent.

The court finds, by consent of counsel, that at the time of the filing of the petition herein the relator was entitled to the relief prayed for; that since the filing of the petition a final order was made and entered in claim *Nó.*6295-27 by said respondent and for that reason no final order is required.

It is therefore by consent of counsel the order of this court that the prayer of the relator for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to make and enter a final order in said claim No. 6295-27 be denied and the petition be dismissed at the cost.of the respondent, the Industrial Commission of Ohio.

*Writ denied.*
#### VICK v. STATE.

No. 25889.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 18, 1952.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 15, 1952.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The offense is the driving, while intoxicated, of a motor vehicle upon a public highway, with punishment assessed at ten days’ confinement in jail and a fine of $500.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception, without which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tektronix, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 25, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
H. Wills, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: January 3, 2007

/s/ RICHARD H. WILLS
---------------------------------------
Richard H. Wills
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Public Accountants

Independent Accountants' Consent

The
Board of Directors
TenFold Corporation:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 333-79053 on Form S-8 of TenFold Corporation and in the registration
statement No. 333-55910 on Form S-8 of TenFold Corporation, of our report dated April 4, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of TenFold
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related results of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and related schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2001, annual report on
Form 10-K of TenFold Corporation.

Our
report dated April 4, 2002, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company suffered a significant loss from operations during the year ended
December 31, 2001, has a substantial deficit in working capital and stockholder's equity at December 31, 2001, had negative cash flow from operations for the year ended
December 31, 2001 and is involved in significant legal proceedings that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements and
related financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

| |  | KPMG LLP
| |  | --------

Salt
Lake City, Utah
April 12, 2002

---

QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7219

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CRAIG DOCKERY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (7:01-cr-00046-F; 7:04-cv-00092-F)

Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 7, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig Dockery, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*In addition to the reasons stated by the district court,

Dockery’s claim filed pursuant to Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S.

296 (2004), is not cognizable, as such a claim does not apply

retroactively to cases on collateral review. See United States v.

Morris, 429 F.3d 65, 72 (4th Cir. 2005). Moreover, his ineffective

assistance of counsel claims based on counsel’s failure to object

pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and United

States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and failure to bring him a

tape recorder so Dockery personally could hear the taped evidence

against him prior to pleading guilty are without merit as Dockery

failed to establish error and prejudice, as required by Strickland

v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 694 (1984).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Craig Dockery seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dockery has not

made the requisite showing.* Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
- 3 -

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                           DA CONSULTING GROUP, INC.

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of DA Consulting Group, Inc. on Form S-1 (File No. 333-43989), on Forms S-8
(File No. 333-71987 and 333-93091), of our report dated March 24, 2000, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of DA Consulting Group, Inc. as
of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998
and 1997, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
March 30, 2000
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5604 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain polycrystalline fibers 

designed for use in pollution control devices for motor vehicles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. ELLISON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain 

polycrystalline fibers designed for use in pollution control 

devices for motor vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN POLYCRYSTALLINE FIBERS DE4 SIGNED FOR USE IN POLLUTION CONTROL 

5 DEVICES FOR MOTOR VEHICLES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5604 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Polycrystalline fibers consisting of greater than 

70% alumina and less than 

30% silica, in bulk, roll or 

blanket form (provided for 

in subheading 6806.10.00), 

the foregoing designed for 

use in pollution control devices for motor vehicles ..... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### North Bronx Theatres, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Daniel Houlihan Corporation, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 27, 1957.

*Monroe E. Stein*for appellant.

*James R. Eyttle*for respondent.

*329Per *Curiam.*

The assignment of mortgage defendant tendered plaintiff together with a Supreme Court order directing cancellation of the mortgage upon filing a satisfaction piece with the order, was ineffectual. Section 322 of the Real Property-Law authorizes only a cancellation of the lost mortgage upon filing of the satisfaction piece with the court order. Since the mortgage was lost by defendant’s agent, as defendant claims, plaintiff is entitled to the extra expense it incurred in recording a new consolidated mortgage.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint, with costs.

Hecht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
Plum Consulting

DJI sUAS Preflight 

Arrival:

1. Remove case and place on level surface

2. Check distance to nearest airport and or 

controlled airspace using maps, 

smartphone or tablet.

3. If required us VHF aviation transceiver or 

phone to contact tower of field if closer 

than 5 NM.

4. Inform tower/ CTAF of UAS ops, location, 

and max height of flight, if required.

Preflight checklist:

1. Remove transmitter

2. Router - On

3. Transmitter - On

4. Toggle Switches - Full Up

5. Video Monitor - On

6. Remove UAS from case.

7. Gimbal Lock & Lens Cap - Removed

8. Micro-SD Card - Inserted

9. UAS Battery - Inserted

10. Place UAS in clear and safe launch zone 

and recovery position if it returns to 

home.

11. UAS Battery - On

12. Wifi connection to Monitor - Verified

13. DJI Application - Load

14. DJI Application - Connect to Camera

15. SD Card - Formatted

16. Camera - Full Up

17. Satellite Connections - Verified

18. Charge Levels - Safe for Flight 

19. Video Recording - Start

20. Verify area clear of hazards

21. Takeoff

After Takeoff Checklist

1. Hover approximately ten feet above the 

ground to confirm UAS is under control

2. All sticks operate correctly while in hover 

-Verified

Pre-Landing Checklist

1. Camera - Full Up

2. Video Recorder - Stop

3. Landing Zone - Clear/ Safe

Post-Landing Checklist - Returning to 

Flight Immediately

1. Battery - Remove & Replace

2. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified

3. DJI application - Connect to Camera

4. Verify area near of hazards

5. Takeoff

End of Ops Checklist

1. Battery - Off

2. Transmitter - Off

3. Router - Off

4. Notify Tower/CTAF - End of Ops