alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tektronix, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 25, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Colin
L. Slade, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 5, 2006

/s/ COLIN L. SLADE
-----------------------------------------------------
Colin L. Slade
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

In connection with the Annual Report of Downside Up, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Angelo Luca,
Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Angelo Luca
---------------
Angelo Luca
Vice-President


                                       23
**Exhibit
      32**





**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of RadioShack Corporation
      (the
“Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Julian C. Day, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, and James F. Gooch, Chief Financial Officer
      of
      the Company, certify to our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Julian C.
      Day





Julian
      C.
      Day


Chief
      Executive
      Officer


April
      30,
      2007








/s/
      James F.
      Gooch





James
      F.
      Gooch


Chief
      Financial
      Officer


April
      30,
      2007








A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.17

October 7,
2004

Mr. Paul
Fusco
[address omitted]

Dear
Paul:

This
letter will confirm our understanding of the arrangements under which your employment with the Company is terminated. The terms and conditions of the termination of your employment
with the Company are set out below.

---







2

---





3

---



If
the foregoing correctly reflects our understanding, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter agreement, whereupon it will become a binding agreement between us.

| |  | J. CREW OPERATING CORP.
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | By:                    

|Agreed to and accepted:
|-----------------------
|By:                    
|Dated: 10/18, 2004     
|Acknowledgment         

|STATE OF    New York)  |    
|---------------------- | ---
|                       | ss:
|COUNTY OF    New York) |    

On
the 18th day of October, 2004, before me personally came Paul Fusco who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at [address omitted], and
did acknowledge and represent that he has had an opportunity to consult with attorneys and other advisers of his choosing regarding the Agreement set forth above, that he has reviewed all of the terms
of the Agreement and that he fully understands all of its provisions, including without limitation, the general release and waiver set forth therein.

|/s/ROSEMARY RODRIGUEZNotary Public |         
|---------------------------------- | --------
|Date:                              | 10/18/04

4

---



QuickLinks
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

____________ No. 22

- 30698 Summary Calendar

____________ Willie E. Berry, Jr.,
Plaintiff

— Appellant ,

versus
Nicholas J. Sanders, Major , Defendant

— Appellee

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:17

- CV

- 318

______________ ________________ Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : * William E. Berry, Jr., Louisiana prisoner # 354431 , sued Nicholas J. Sanders, an employee of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections (DPSC), under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Sanders had used excessive force. A jury rendered a verdict in Sanders’s favor. Berry moved for a new trial, alleging that during discover y , DPSC had produced two

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir

. R

. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 11, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-30698 Document: 00516854935 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/11/2023No. 22

- 30698

2 v ersions of the same logbook that differed in material ways, including as to the identities of officers assigned to hi s unit on the day of the incident. See generally Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(a). The district court denied relief, concluding that Berry had not s hown that the jury’s verdict was against the clear weight of the evidence , because he brought the discrepancies to the jury’s attention at trial and its verdict was based on a credibility determination. Berry appeals the denial of postjudgment relief . He does not challenge the jury’s verdict. Berry fails to show that the district court abused its discretion. See Seibert v. Jackson Cnty., Mississippi , 851 F.3d 430, 438 (5th Cir. 2017). Critically, Berry does not identify any error in the distr ict court’s dispositive finding that he could not show prejudice because the jury was aware of the discrepant records when it rendered its verdict or otherwise explain how he was prejudiced

. T he judgment is accordingly AFFIRMED

. Case: 22-30698 Document: 00516854935 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/11/2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26866]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Clinical Center; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Governors of the Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: Board of Governors of the Warren Grant 
Magnuson Clinical Center Executive Committee.
    Date: November 17, 2000.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center Medical 
Board Room, 2C115, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Maureen E. Gormley, Executive Secretary, Warren 
Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 
Building 10, Room 2C146, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/496-2897.

    Dated: October 12, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-26866 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CertificationPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, John J. Nicola, Chief FinancialOfficer of K-Sea General Partner GP LLC, as general partner of K-Sea GeneralPartner L.P., the general partner of K-Sea Transportation Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”),hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)         The Partnership’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|                                | /s/ JOHN J.  NICOLA |
|--------------------------------|---------------------|
| Dated: September 6,  2006 | Name:               | John J. Nicola |
|                           | Title:              | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM TECHSYM'S THIRD QUARTER 1996 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          27,353
<SECURITIES>                                     6,415
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     83,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234,003
<PP&E>                                          48,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 329,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           791
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   329,477
<SALES>                                         88,110
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           60,163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,261
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,696
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,297
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,297
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS REPORTED ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1999
<CASH>                                       5,577,430
<SECURITIES>                                 9,099,268
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,882,248
<PP&E>                                         267,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                 258,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,667,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,656,269
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          143,020
<PREFERRED>                                  6,150,000
<COMMON>                                           137
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,717,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,667,371
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,208,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (128,830)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,079,285)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,079,285)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (4,240,000)<F1>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,319,285)<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)<F1>
        
<FN>
<F1> Reflects preferred stock preference amounts equal to $4,240,000, and (0.31)
per share.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Exhibit
31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Robert W. Cook, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of MELA Sciences, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed
under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation;

d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operations of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b)
any fraud whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.



| |                                  
| | ---------------------------------
| | /s/
    Robert W. Cook           
| | Robert
    W. Cook               
| | Chief
    Financial Officer      
| | (Principal
    Financial Officer)

Date:
April 28, 2015
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Triple Net Properties, LLC, the Manager of NNN 2002 Value Fund,
LLC (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that: (i)
the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/   Anthony W. ThompsonAnthony W. ThompsonChief Executive Officer
Triple Net Properties, LLC,
the Manager of NNN 2002 Value Fund, LLC Date: August 1, 2005 A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The
foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys
Form 10-K/A for the period
ended December 31, 2004 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless
of any general information language in such filing.
#### CONWAY v. STATE.

No. 23266.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 9, 1946.

*736R. Lee Davis, of Orange, and Baskett & Parks, of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCPIAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a sentence of two years in the penitentiary on a charge of perjury.

Appellant and her stepfather had been indicted, by a previous grand jury, on charges of incest. At the time of the return of that indictment appellant was out of the county and was not available for examination by the grand jury. The subsequent session, according to the evidence of the district attorney and the foreman, desired to know what she would testify in the two cases pending against her and her stepfather. She was called and sworn and she denied emphatically that her stepfather had ever had sexual intercourse with her, in Orange County or any other place, at any time. This testimony is the basis for the indictment of perjury in the instant case.

When this case was called for trial appellant filed a motion to quash. Inasmuch as the indictment did not show the purpose for which she was called before the grand jury as above stated, the court properly refused to quash the indictment at that time. Later the foregoing evidence was produced and it is our conclusion that the procedure then described by the district attorney and the foreman of the grand jury was such that an indictment for perjury would not lie. The court should have granted the motion in arrest of judgment.

On the trial of the case the State relied, for conviction on statements made by appellant to other parties to the effect that her stepfather had been having sexual intercourse with her. Such statements would come under the classification of extrajudicial confessions. They were not corroborated and were, therefore, insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. Article 723, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., and citations thereunder; Brooks v. State, 29 Tex.App. 582, 16 S.W. 542; Waters v. State, 30 Tex.App. 284, 17 S.W. 411; Agar v. State, 29 Tex.App. 605, 16 S.W. 761; Miles v. State, 73 Tex.Cr.R. 493, 165 S.W. 567; King v. State, 112 Tex.Cr.R. 425, 16 S.W.2d 1072.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed on the facts, with a suggestion that, under the circumstances described by the foreman of the grand jury and the district attorney, a serious question has arisen as to the validity of the indictment. Ex parte Richards, 109 Tex.Cr.R. 387, 4 S.W.2d 974, and authorities there discussed; Carpenter v. State, 81 Tex.Cr.R. 298, 195 S.W. 199.
Exhibit99.1



INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REPORT





Board of Directors

The Standard Register Company

Dayton, Ohio



We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of March 28, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the thirteen weeks ended March 28, 2004 and March 30, 2003.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.



We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.



Based upon our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of December 28, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 6, 2004, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 28, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/S/

BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP



BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP







April 20, 2004