alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXH 10.19

                                  March 1, 1999

Dr. Martin Weinstein
111 Sheffield Drive 
San Antonio, TX 78218

Dear Marty:

     Reference is made to the Employment Agreement dated as of
October 1, 1991 between Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corporation and you,
as amended by Agreement dated as of June 1, 1993, as further
amended by letter agreement dated as of February 23, 1995 and as
further amended by Agreement dated as of June 1, 1996 (the
"Agreement").  This shall confirm that the term of the Agreement as
specified in Paragraph 1(a) thereof is hereby extended for an
additional three (3) year period commencing as of  January 1, 2000
and expiring December 31, 2002.  The foregoing is expressly subject
to the provisions of Paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Agreement.

     This shall also confirm that the first sentence of Paragraph
2(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety
as follows:

     Aa salary (ABase Salary@) at the rate of $530,700 a year (that
     being the effective rate commencing March 1, 1999) payable in
     approximately equal installments no less frequently than bi-
     weekly, and subject to annual review in the same manner as
     reviews are held for other executive officers of Sequa;@

     Except as set forth above, this letter shall not amend or
affect your Agreement; said Agreement, as hereby amended, shall
remain in full force and effect.  If the above is in accordance
with your understanding, please sign the enclosed duplicate of this
letter and return it to the undersigned.  Upon our receipt of such
fully executed copy, this shall constitute a binding agreement
between us.

                                  CHROMALLOY GAS TURBINE CORPORATION



                                  By:_________________________________
                                      Norman E. Alexander, Director
                                      

                                  By:_________________________________
                                      Stuart Z. Krinsly, Vice President

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

By:___________________________Date:___________
        Martin Weinstein
#### GORDON v. STATE.

No. 27046.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 16, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of forgery and his punishment was assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

*677The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

Our statutes providing for appeals in felony cases during term time require the entering into a recognizance instead of an appeal bond, as was done in this case. Art. 818, C.C.P. An appeal bond filed during the term of court does not give this court jurisdiction.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

The record herein'does not present anything for review, therefore no motion to re-instate the appeal will be entertained.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PATHMARK
STORES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 6 WEEKS ENDED
OCTOBER 28, 2000 AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET ON OCTOBER 28, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                          13,114
<SECURITIES>                                    46,447
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (965)
<INVENTORY>                                    198,704
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               371,673
<PP&E>                                         493,980
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,458)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,782,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          273,440
<BONDS>                                        444,638
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           301
<OTHER-SE>                                     636,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,782,270
<SALES>                                        437,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               437,727
<CGS>                                          315,050
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  315,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8,817)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,466)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.97)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2817 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2817

  To amend title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act to remove the 
   non-discrimination requirements relating to health care providers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2013

  Mr. Harris introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act to remove the 
   non-discrimination requirements relating to health care providers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Patient Access to Quality 
Health Professionals Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. REMOVING NON-DISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO HEALTH 
              CARE PROVIDERS.

    Section 2706 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-5) 
is amended by striking ``non-discrimination in health care'' and all 
that follows through ``The provisions of section 1558'' and inserting 
the following: ``non-discrimination in health care.
    ``The provisions of section 1558''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ex parte LANCASTER.

No. 26157.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 10, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty. and Charles S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, George P„ Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Criminal District Court of Dallas County refusing to discharge appellant on his application fot writ of habeas corpus and re*386manding him to the custody of the Sheriff, with instructions to deliver him to the agent of the demanding State.

The State established a prima facie case.

Appellant did not testify nor offer any witnesses in his behalf. Therefore, no issue was made as to his identity, and the trial court acted properly in remanding appellant to the custody of the Sheriff.

No bills of exception appear in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26964]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hearby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: October 25, 2000.
    Time: 11:00 am to 12:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E01, Rockville, MD 20852 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jon M. Ranhand, PhD, Scientist Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5E03, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the re view and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: October 13, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-26964 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 31.2**
CERTIFICATION
I, Charles P. Huffman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of EnergySouth, Inc. (the“Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation;and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 c) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably which are likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  d) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: December 3, 2004 /s/ Charles P. Huffman     Charles P. Huffman   Senior Vice President and
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the First Amended Annual Report of Joytoto USA, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Seong Yong Cho, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                May 8, 2008
            /s/
                Seong Yong ChoBy:
                Seong Yong ChoIts:
                Chief Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Joytoto USA, Inc. and will be retained by Joytoto USA, Inc. and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2835 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the amendments 

made by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act which disqualify 

expenses for over-the-counter drugs under health savings accounts and 

health flexible spending arrangements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2013 

Ms. JENKINS (for herself, Mr. BARROW of Georgia, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, and Mr. HARRIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the amendments made by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act which disqualify expenses for overthe-counter drugs under health savings accounts and 

health flexible spending arrangements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Access to 

5 Medication Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2835 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DISQUALIFICATION OF EXPENSES FOR 

2 OVER-THE-COUNTER DRUGS UNDER CERTAIN 

3 ACCOUNTS AND ARRANGEMENTS. 

4 (a) HSAS.—Subparagraph (A) of section 223(d)(2) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik6 ing the last sentence. 

7 (b) ARCHER MSAS.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

8 220(d)(2) of such Code is amended by striking the last 

9 sentence. 

10 (c) HEALTH FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS

11 AND HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS.—Sec12 tion 106 of such Code is amended by striking subsection 

13 (f). 

14 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to expenses incurred after Decem16 ber 31, 2013. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6369

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN ALPHONZO HUYGHUE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CA-01-309; CA-04-531)

Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 16, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Alphonzo Huyghue, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Albert Jamison

Lang, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Winston-Salem, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John Alphonzo Huyghue seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) as

untimely. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

§ 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Huyghue has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis,

deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal as

untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26699]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP98-43-013]


Anadarko Gathering Company; Notice of Refund Report

October 12, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 18, 2000, Anadarko Gathering Company (AGC) 
tendered for filing its 1999 Kansas Ad Valorem Tax Annual Report in the 
above-referenced docket pursuant to the Commission's Order Denying 
Petitions for Adjustment and Establishing Procedures for the Payment of 
Refunds, issued September 10, 1997, in Docket No. RP97-369-000, et. al. 
(September 10, 1997 Order).
    AGC states that the information provided in the May 1999 Annual 
Report has not changed in the past twelve months. Thus AGC incorporates 
by reference therein the May 1999 Annual Report and respectfully 
requests that the Commission accept its letter filing as being in 
compliance with the Ordering Paragraph (E) of the September 10, 1997 
Order.
    AGC states that copies of its filing have been provided to all 
parties and the Kansas Corporation Commission.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before October 23, 2000. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be 
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-
208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26699 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1 

### MEMORANDUM

**Tetra Tech, Inc. 10306 Eaton Place, Suite 340**  **Fairfax, VA 22030 phone**  **703 -** **385 -** **6000 fax**  **703 -** **385 -** **6007** TO : Paul Shriner and Jan Matuszko, EPA FROM : Kelly

Meadows DATE: November 10, 2009 SUBJECT: Distribution of Closed

- Cycle Cooling Systems EPA requested that Tetra Tech examine the distribution of closed

- cycle cooling across several types of facility

characteristics. This memo summarizes Tetra Tech’s analys is of the data. Electric Generators Generating Capacity MW Facilities with Towers (n=174) All Generators (n=671) 0
- 100 8.2% 13.4% 100
-250 11.2% 13.7% 250
- 500 11.3% 14.8% 500
- 750 14.5% 14.5% 750
- 1000 8% 8.3% 1000
- 1500 15.6% 13.1% 1500
-2000 14.9% 9.5% 2000
- 3000 12.8% 7.5% >3000 1.7% 1% Note that there are 27 retired facilities (according to Abt data) and some that are combustion turbines

--these won't show up as having any steam generating capacity
. Waterbody

Ty pe Waterbody

Ty pe Facilities with Towers

(n=174) All Generators (n=671) Freshwater River 72.6% 52% Lake 15.8% 20%2

Estuary 8.2% 17.5% Great Lake 3.4% 7.2% Ocean 0% 3.4% EPA Region EPA Region Facilities with Towers (n=174) All Generators (n=671) R1 3% 5.4% R2 2.5% 7.5% R3 18.4% 11.6% R4 24.8% 20.2% R5 17.2% 23.1% R6 16.7% 15.6% R7 4.6% 7.2% R8 9.3% 4.2% R9 1.8% 4% R10 1.7% 1% Flow DIF (mgd) Facilities with

Towers (n= 174) Fully CCRS Facilities (n=112) All Generators

(n=671) 2
-20 32.3% 44.4% 9.8% 20
- 30 6.9% 8.9% 2.8% 30
-40 7% 10.9% 3.1% 40
- 50 4% 4.5% 1.8% 50
- 75 5.2% 7.1% 4.4% 75
- 100 5.2% 5.4% 3.9% 100
-200 14% 14.5% 13.4% 200
-400 8% 2.7% 16.2% 400
- 800 7% 1% 21.6% 800
-2000 9.2% 1% 19.2% >2000 1.1% 0% 3.9% The first column includes combination facilities. CUR CUR Facilities with Towers (n=174) All Generators (n=671) 0
- 15% 8.9% 15.2% 15
- 50% 6.9% 15% 50
- 75% 9.3% 19.7% 75
- 90% 60% 42.9% >90% 9.8% 7.2% Fuel Type Fuel Type Facilities with Towers All Generators3 (n=174) (n=671) C oal 64% 55.4% Nuclear 13.8% 9.3% O il 2.3% 5.1% Gas 18.6% 29.3% Other 1.9% 1% Manufacturers Waterbody

Ty pe Waterbody

Ty pe Facilities with Towers

(n=210) All Manufacturers (n=592) Freshwater River 78.1% 76.7% Lake 8% 7% Estuary 7.7% 6.6% Great Lake 6.1% 7.8% Ocean 0% 1.8% EPA Region EPA Region Facilities with Towers (n=210) All Manufacturers (n=592) R1 2 % 5. 9 % R2 2. 5 % 11.1 % R3 15.9 % 12.8 % R4 35.9 % 18.1 % R5 12.7 % 24 % R6 21.9 % 15.4 % R7 2.5 % 1.9 % R8 4.2 % 2.9 % R9 0 % 1.5 % R10 2.1 % 6 % Flow DIF (mgd) Facilities with

Towers (n=210) Fully CCRS Facilities (n=97 ) All Manufacturers

(n=592) 2
-20 37.4 % 57 % 39.6 % 20
- 30 13.2 % 21.4 % 13.3 % 30
-40 14.1 % 10. 6 % 12.6 % 40
- 50 5.5 % 5.7 % 7.2 % 50
- 75 13.7 % 1 .7 % 9.2 % 75
- 100 4.8 % 1.1 % 5 % 100
-200 5.5 % 2.3 % 7.4 % 200
-400 3 % 0 % 3.2 % 400
- 800 2.6 % 0 % 1.7 %4

800
-2000 0 % 0 % 0.5 % >2000 0 % 0% 0.3 % The first column includes combination facilities. Industry Sector Industry Sector Facilities with Towers

(n=210) All Manufacturers (n=592) Metals 14% 14.9% Chemicals 31.5% 31.3% Paper 30% 37.8% Petroleum 16% 6.6% Other 8.4% 9.5%
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACOACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00497-ADA

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA), INC., §

ZTE (TX), INC.

Defendant

ORDER SETTING Discovery DISCOVERY HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is SETET for

DISCOVERY HEARING, in U.S. Magistrate Court, Courtroom No. 2, Third Floor, 800 Franklin

Avenue, Waco,aco Texas, on November 01, 2022 at 01:30 PM.

28th day of October, 2022.

Derek T. Gilliland

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA-DTG Document 240 Filed 10/28/22 Page 1 of 1