alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 28, 2014 The Honorable Anthony Fo xx Secretary of Transportation U.S. Department
of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Foxx:

OV GLOBAL Cinda Richards H umanResource Ma n ager,G

l oba

l E n gi neerin g Underground Mining Frank

li n,PA On June 24, 2014, the communities

of Franklin and Oil City, and the Venango County Regional Airport, wereserved with the Department
of Transportation Order 2014-6-6; Terminating EAS Eligibility and Establishing Waiver Procedures for possible continuation
orreinstatement

of commercial air service tothe region. For several years,the Airport Manager at Venango County Regional airport has worked torestore service to Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT), which is the preferred and regular connector for airline passengersfrom this region. There
is nowan opportunity
to regain service toPIT with an airline carrier committed
tothe local communities through aneffective business model which has a proventrack record of implementation

in smaller regions. On behalf of Joy Global employees

in the Oil Heritage Region whom utilize air services provided by the Venango County Regional Airport,

I am writing to express my supportfor awaiver for the Franklin and Oil City communities
so they mayhave an opportunity
toassessmore dependable travel options and for timely commercial air service toPIT. Joy Global
is the second largest employer

in Venango County and the restoration
of the connection
toPIT will be acrucial partof the area's economic landscape for future growth and prosperity. Thank youfor yourtime. Sincerely, Cinda Richards Human Resource Manager

,Global Engineering Cc: Senator Bob Casey Congressmen Glenn Thompson Governor Tom Corbett Penn Dot Secretary Barry Scoch Commissioners, County of Venango File

120 liberty Street

I Frank lin, PA 16323 +1814 432 1751
### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (Mailcode 7101 M) Washington, D.C. 20460

OPPTS-RCS-OMB-7f (revised 11/15/2010) If you have any questions about this regulatory action or this documentation, please call the contact: Name: eMail: Phone: 

### Title of Action: 

## Documentation of Changes Made During Review Under Executive Order 12866

Docket #: EPA-HQ- FRL#: RIN: 2070-

This action was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). According to section 6(a)(3)(E) of the Executive Order, whenever the Agency makes publicly available an action that was reviewed under Executive Order 12866, the Agency is also required to:

(1) Make available to the public a copy of the information that was provided to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review under the Executive Order, i.e., the text of the draft action and, if applicable, an assessment of the potential costs and benefits; as well as additional information required for those actions that are determined to be economically significant under section 3(f) of the Executive Order (see section 6(a)(3)(B) & (C)); (2) Identify for the public any substantive changes made to the draft submitted to OMB, using a method that is complete, clear and simple; and (3) Identify for the public those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OIRA/OMB. 

### For this action, were substantive changes made during the review? [Check the appropriate answer.]
Yes. [The information identified in items 1-3 below is included in the docket, as applicable.] No. [Only the information identified in item 1 below is included in the docket.] 

### Accordingly, the Agency has included the following information in the public docket for this action: [Check the appropriate box(es).]
(2) Documentation of any substantive changes that were made to the draft document that was submitted to OIRA/OMB for review, when compared with what completed review, using one of the following methods (select one): (1) A copy of the information that was submitted to OIRA for review under the Executive Order.

(3) Documentation of those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OMB , if any, are identified in the document using one of the following methods (select one): (a) A copy of the draft document submitted, with redline and strikeout to show all the substantive changes that were made during the review. (b) A document that identifies the substantive changes that were made during the review, with page and paragraph references to the draft document that was submitted.

(a) Through attributions to OMB in the redline and strikeout version or other document identifying the changes made at OMB's recommendation. (c) Other (please describe):

(b) Other (please describe):

Ellie Clark clark.ellie@epa.gov 202-564-2962 

### Toluene Diisocyanate (TDI) And Related Compounds Action Plan
OPPT-2011-0180 (n/a) ZA14

The redlined changes were all made at OMB's recommendation.
# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Correction. 

# SUMMARY:

This action corrects Public Land Order No. 7427, 65 FR 2423-2424, published January 14, 2000, as FR Doc. 00-937.

On page 2423, third column, paragraph 1, under the total areas described, which reads “8,970.59 acres in Eddy County,” is hereby corrected to read “8470.59 acres in Eddy County.”

Dated: January 27, 2000.

Carsten F. Goff,

Deputy State Director. 

[FR Doc. 00-2698  Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000095676
<NAME>                        Meridian Medical Technologies
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.0
<CASH>                                         295,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,684,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   247,800
<INVENTORY>                                    8,541,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,859,000
<PP&E>                                         15,286,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 874,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 45,660,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,223,000
<BONDS>                                        15,739,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       294,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,404,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   45,660,000
<SALES>                                        10,723,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,723,000
<CGS>                                          6,388,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,852,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (186,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             676,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                993,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   354,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   639,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.19
        




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                        68
<INVENTORY>                                     12,975
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,697
<PP&E>                                         202,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,247
<BONDS>                                        137,461
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,879
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   214,587
<SALES>                                        103,673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,822
<CGS>                                           95,063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,979)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,979)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,006)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,985)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
1

Tong, Stanley

From: Michael Morris <mmorris@aqmd.gov>

Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 2:08 PM

To: Tong, Stanley

Subject: RE: Asphalt release agent?

Hi Stan, 

Yes, we are working on regulating asphalt release agents. PR 1161 is scheduled to be heard in January. Very optimistic 

projection. We have Dr. Cocker at UCR looking at the relative evaporation rates of diesel and soy at elevated 

temperatures (to release the hot mix). That should be done end of Q1 in 2016. If the soy doesn’t evaporate then we 

likely will allow the hot mix and just limit the VOC of the release agent. 

Let me know if you have questions or comments. 

Regards, 

Mike 

P.S. On a side note, SCAQMD M313 would be perfect for this rule 

From: Tong, Stanley [mailto:Tong.Stanley@epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 3:41 PM 

To: Michael Morris 

Subject: Asphalt release agent? 

Mike, 

I saw your name on the following report. Is SC considering regulating asphalt release agents? 

And if so, which rule? 

(Another State asked us if EPA prohibits diesel fuel as an asphalt release agent) 

http://www.irta.us/reports/Finalscaqmdmoldrelrept.pdf 

Alternative Low-VOC Release Agents and Mold Cleaners for Industrial Molding, Concrete Stamping and Asphalt 

Applications 

Is there interest in encouraging the use of warm mix asphalt as an option to hot mix? 

Stan 

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

Stanley Tong 

US EPA Region IX 

Air Division - Rules Office (AIR 4) 

75 Hawthorne St. 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

tong.stanley@epa.gov

415 947 4122 (w) 

415 947 3579 (f)
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

The following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive
Officer of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. on the basis of such officers knowledge
and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2003 (the Report), I,
Brad A. Luecke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and                   
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ Brad A. Luecke     
| |  |                        
| |  | Name: Brad A. Luecke   
| |  | Title:  President and  
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | Date: April 16, 2003
Order entered November 7 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00634
- CV TODD PRUETT, Appellant
V. MICHAEL PITTMAN, M.D . , Appellee On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 07463 

### O RDER Before the Court are appellant’s October 31, 2013 motion to document that his amended brief was mailed and his October 22, 2013 motion to add newly discovered information to his appellate brief. In response to appellant’s mo tion to document that his amended brief was mailed, the Court received appellant’s third amended brief on October 30, 2013.
We GRANT appellant’s motion to add newly discovered information. Appellant’s third amended brief incorporates the additional argume nt. The Court will not accept any further amended briefs from appellant. Appellee’s brief is due on November 20, 2013.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3044 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3044

   To approve the transfer of Yellow Creek Port properties in Iuka, 
                              Mississippi.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2013

Mr. Nunnelee (for himself, Mr. Harper, Mr. Palazzo, and Mr. Thompson of 
 Mississippi) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To approve the transfer of Yellow Creek Port properties in Iuka, 
                              Mississippi.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF YELLOW CREEK PORT PROPERTIES.

    In accordance with section 4(k) of the Tennessee Valley Authority 
Act of 1933 (16 U.S.C. 831c(k)), Congress approves the conveyance by 
the Tennessee Valley Authority, on behalf of the United States, to the 
State of Mississippi of the Yellow Creek Port properties owned by the 
United States and in the custody of the Authority at Iuka, Mississippi, 
as of the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### WYNNE v. STATE.

No. 24065.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 2, 1948.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State,

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The -offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, thirty days’ confinement in the county jail.

*757The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for the consideration of this court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tektronix, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Colin
L. Slade, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: October 4, 2002


/s/ COLIN L. SLADE
-------------------------------------------------
Colin L. Slade
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable L R. Thom;lson 

county Auditor 

Taylor County 

'hbileno, Texas 

Dear sir: Opinion No. 04968 

Her I8 it lo& for the County 

&wlltor to leous a warrant 

to tlls County Tax A8sessQrColleato* &u paymnt ol 

aoilaage Wand from Auntin 

on burrirur9i oonneotod rith 

his orrice, and a related 

question? 

Your letter of September 11, 1941, requn&Ang an 

opinion of this depnrtsesnt, reada in part a@ follows: 

"18 It legel tar the aouaty audLtor to 

issue a warrant tn the county tax asremsorcolleator in payment of railerg to and from 

Austin on buaineae aonneated with him offloe? 

Y3ueh a, bill har been presented to me 

ati I want your opinion before lesulng euah 

warrant. 

wAlao, ia it legal to Iraue the tax 

aseessor-aolleotor a rmrrant in payxtent for 

mllea:..;e used in collseting bad checks?" 

mie county offlalale of Taylor Coutltg ore cgtensated for their esrviaes on an annual salcry baste. - 

tioh b of Article 3899 Vrrnon's Annotated Civil Statuterr, 

provides that euch offIce-rare empowered and pellfiitted to 

;;urohase and hrve charged to t~heir reepeative eotitiee all 

reasonabla expanses necessary in the pro;rer enll legal oonCuct of thir respective 0:floes 88 authorized by said stati 
BooorabLLr L. R. Thou&son, Page 2 

ute. This de~art;rent hae reaeetedly mled thst in the abBcmCCI of Q vari:: #i?tatute, tke Comd3alon8rs~ Court has no 

authority to allcw eny sum of noney to 1:s members ior 

tr~.vel.ing expenees. Thici tI8partmat has held, ~180, &hat 

0 County iRzcge was not ont:tld to mfleage or expense5 incurre& on trips to kitstin on oEfiaia1 bueiness. (Oee opinions Wo. O-EC% and C47Cil cad tke opinions of thle departient zzentioned therein. ) 

V;S do :iot think that Seotion b, kticle ja99, l p r a , 

authorizes the Fyment nf nileaae to the County keee80rColleator of Taxes to and from Au&In, altho~h auoh trip or 

trip la made on 0sriem business. Ye fail to find any statute authorlzin& the payment of expenses for or la oonnaation 

with either of the above aentloned trenmotione. Thoretore, 

in the absence of such a statute, we respe~~ly an6wec both V 

of the above stated questions la the negative. 

Trueting th&t the foregoing fully answer8 your fs- 

&ry , we are 

Yours very truly 

A’lTORliXT CkSNERhL OS! TNiAS 

hv?tco APPROVEDSEP 23. 1941 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
On December 1, 1999, the United States lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, No. G-99-731, in                     *United States of America*                     v.                     *GAF Corp., et al.,*                     pursuant to Sections 104 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9604 and 9607. The proposed Consent Decree resolves civil claims of the United States against thirty-five                     *de minimis*                     generator Defendants for the Tex Tin Superfund Site located in Texas City and La Marque, Texas. The Defendants will pay a total of approximately $1.5 million in reimbursement of response costs at the Site.                

                    On December 16, 1999 a Notice was published which advised that the Department of Justice would receive comments relating to the proposed Consent Decree for 30 days following publication of the Notice. Notice is hereby given that the period during which the Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the proposed Consent Decree has been extended at the request of a member of the public. The Department of Justice will continue to accept comments through the 30th day following publication of this Notice. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, United States Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to                     *United States of America*                     v.                     *GAF Corp., et al.,*                     DJ No. 90-11-3-1669/1. The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Texas, Houston, Texas, and the Region VI Office of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained by mail from the Department of Justice Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check for reproduction costs (at 25 cents per page) in the amount of $14.75 for the Decree, payable to the Consent Decree Library.                

Joel M. Gross,

Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 00-2702 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Exhibit 99.1

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bear Island Paper
Company, L.L.C. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Peter M. Brant, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Edward D.
Sherrick, as Vice President of Finance of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Peter M. Brant
------------------------------
Name: Peter M. Brant
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 31, 2003



/s/ Edward D. Sherrick
------------------------------
Name: Edward D. Sherrick
Title: Vice President of Finance
Date: March 31, 2003



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Bear Island Paper Company, L.L.C. and will be retained by Bear
Island Paper Company, L.L.C. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.