alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2845 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2845

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow retail 
 community pharmacies to deliver diabetic testing supplies to Medicare 
                             beneficiaries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2013

  Mr. Welch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow retail 
 community pharmacies to deliver diabetic testing supplies to Medicare 
                             beneficiaries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Diabetic Testing Supply Access Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR RETAIL COMMUNITY PHARMACIES TO DELIVER DIABETIC 
              TESTING SUPPLIES TO MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1847(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395w-3(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(8) Nothing in this section shall be construed as 
        authorizing the Secretary (through regulation, guidance, 
        instruction, or otherwise) to restrict or eliminate an 
        individual's option of electing, regardless of delivery method 
        (except by mail), to have diabetic testing supplies delivered 
        to the individual by a retail community pharmacy (as defined in 
        section 1927(k)(10)), including a retail community pharmacy 
        that contracts with a long-term care facility, assisted living 
        facility, group home, or other type of residential setting 
        recognized by the State. This paragraph shall not be construed 
        as changing the amount of payment made under this part for 
        diabetic testing supplies, but only as authorizing delivery of 
        such supplies to individuals through retail community 
        pharmacies.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to diabetic testing supplies delivered on or after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2834 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2834

 To include under Federal laws granting rights and responsibilities to 
    married couples other couples in other legal unions similar to 
      marriage, including domestic partnerships and civil unions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2013

   Mr. Holt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To include under Federal laws granting rights and responsibilities to 
    married couples other couples in other legal unions similar to 
      marriage, including domestic partnerships and civil unions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Benefits Equality Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE.

    (a) In General.--Section 7 of title 1, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows--
``Sec. 7. `Marriage' as including civil unions and domestic 
              partnerships; `spouse' as including members of such 
              unions
    ``In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, the term 
`marriage' includes a marriage, a domestic partnership, a civil union, 
or any other similar legal union between 2 individuals that is 
recognized by a State, the District of Columbia, a territory or 
possession of the United States, or a federally recognized Indian 
tribe, and the word `spouse' refers to either member of such a legal 
union.'' .
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The item for section 7 in the table of 
sections at the beginning of chapter 1 is amended to read as follows:

``7. `Marriage' as including civil unions and domestic parnerships; 
                            `spouse' as including members of such legal 
                            unions.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7446

HENRY ALLEN BECKMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SCDC; MICHAEL MOORE; WILLIAM CATOE; JAMES

HARVEY; GEORGE T. HAGAN; ANTHONY PADULA;

WILLIAM HAYES; CHRISTOPHER ALAN DAVIS; SHIRLEY

BROWN; HENRY A. LANGSTON; DONALD SAMPSON;

MARCIE MYERS; ROBIN PACHAK; JUDITH SAWYER;

FLORENCE CHRETIAN; J. ALEXANDER, Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-97-2798-2-23AJ)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Allen Beckman, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr.,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Henry Allen Beckman appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Beckman v. SCDC, No. CA-97-2798-2-23AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133515 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan CHASE EQUIPMENT LEASING, INC., Successor in interest to National Bank of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133515 COA: 272281 Ct of Claims: 04-000238-MT DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 13, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, John J. Hayes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunair Services Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2007                                                       /s/ JOHN J. HAYES   John J. Hayes   *President and Chief Executive Officer*
### Request for Information D' Avion LLC (FAA-2015-3755) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Davis:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is miss ing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

− 2015

− 3755). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administrati on (FAA) to process your p etition. Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 3:14 PM To: c.davis@davisaviation.com

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Op erations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional informati on (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, plea se also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we mu st receive the information described above by November 27, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999 .

FAA Office of Rulemaking
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26754]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Leadership Initiatives Advisory 
Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that two 
meetings of the Leadership Initiatives Advisory Panel (AccessAbility 
and Arts Education sections) to the National Council on the Arts will 
be held on October 20, 2000 and October 25, 2000 respectively. The 
panels will meet by teleconference as follows:

    AccessAbility Section: from 1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. in Room 528
    Arts Education Section: from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. in Room 703 
at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, 
DC, 20506.

    These meetings are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, 
evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the 
National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In 
accordance with the determination of the Chairman of May 12, 2000, 
these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection 
(c)(4),(6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, 
National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506, or call 202/
682-5691.

    Dated: October 13, 2000.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 00-26754 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-U
**EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3A(Nos. 333-123603 and 333-36564) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-125191, 333-132491 and 333-134180) ofMidwest Banc Holdings, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2007 relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPChicago, Illinois
First Amendment of Purchase and Sale Agreement



 Exhibit 10.21 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT OF PURCHASE 
 AND SALE AGREEMENT 
  
 First
Amendment of Purchase and Sale Agreement (this “Amendment”), made and entered into this I7th day of
February, 2006, by and between General America Corporation, a Washington corporation (“Seller”) and Microsoft Corporation, a Washington corporation (“Purchaser”). 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 A. Seller and Purchaser are the parties to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions effective as of January 13, 2006 (the
“Agreement”). 
  
 B. The parties desire to extend the “Inspection
Period” as defined in the Agreement. 
  
 AGREEMENTS

  
 1. Extension of Inspection Period. The first sentence of Section
5.1 (a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the words “the date that is thirty (30) days after the Effective Date” and substituting the words “February 17th, 2006”. 
  
 2. No Other Amendments. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect. 
  

			
	SELLER:
	
	GENERAL AMERICA CORPORATION, a Washington corporation
		
	By	 	 /s/ Stephanie Daley-Watson


	Its	 	Vice President & Secretary
	
	PURCHASER:
	
	 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a
 Washington
corporation

		
	By	 	 /s/ James Ableson


	Its	 	Director, Real Estate & Facilities
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2802 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2802

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 418 Liberty Street in Covington, Indiana, as the ``Fountain County 
                    Veterans Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FOUNTAIN COUNTY VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 418 Liberty Street in Covington, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Fountain County Veterans Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Fountain 
County Veterans Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 23.1**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP,Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-105550 and 333-110966) andrelated Prospectuses, and also in the Registration Statements(Form S-8 Nos. 333-60207, 333-101673 and 333-114531) of ourreports dated March 4, 2005, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of United DefenseIndustries, Inc. (“United Defense”), United Defensemanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of United Defense,included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2004./s/ Ernst & Young LLPMcLean, VirginiaMarch 4, 2005
50
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Restaurant Training Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Victoria Z. Carlton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of April, 2005.




/s/ Victoria Z. Carlton
-------------------------------
Victoria Z. Carlton
President and CEO
Restaurant Training Corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             466
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     65,548
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,524
<PP&E>                                          65,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          152,043
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,365
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,155
<SALES>                                         13,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,655
<CGS>                                           13,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,926
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,916
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,829)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,829)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (55)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,884)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2010 

d0222 

Order 

 

February 26, 2010 

140059 

LEWIS C. HART, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140059 

 COA: 286879 

Jackson CC: 08-001951-AH 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 3, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.