alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

MEMORANDUM

Date: July 30, 2012

Subject: EPA – EMI – Felman Corporation Teleconference Summary (July 2, 2012)

From: Beth Friedman, EC/R Incorporated

To: Conrad Chin, OAQPS/SPPD/MMG (D243-02)

I. Introduction:

A conference call was held on July 2, 2012 to discuss the possibility of testing additional 

pollutants, performing fenceline monitoring, and hosting plant visits at Eramat Marietta 

(EMI) and Felman Production. This memo provides an overview of the issues discussed.

II. Participants:

Beveridge & Diamond: Amy Lincoln (counsel for Felman)

Jones Day: John Rego (counsel for EMI)

EPA/OAQPS: Conrad Chin, Chuck French, Ray Merrill

EC/R Incorporated (Contractor for EPA): Beth Friedman, Brad Nelson

III.Summary of Discussions:

The following topics were discussed.

EPA asked the plants if it would be possible in include testing for polychlorinated 

biphenyls (PCBs) and dioxins in the July 2012 compliance tests. Both plants 

replied that there is not enough time to change the test plan and still obtain the 

needed compliance tests in this short period. The test contractors are already 

booked, and there is not enough time to conduct more testing given their 

availability. 

The plants agreed that they could conduct testing for PCBs and dioxins in the 

proposed next round of tests to occur early in 2013, if EPA obtains an extension 

to the court-ordered promulgation date. Then, additional time would be needed 

to transmit the results to EPA and for EPA to analyze the data and prepare the 

final rule.

EPA asked if the plants were still considering fenceline monitoring as an 

alternative option and if they could collect “baseline” data. The plants responded 
2

that they would need more information to respond to this question. EPA agreed 

to prepare a proposed fenceline monitoring protocol for review by the plants. 

EPA asked the plants if an EPA observer could attend one or both tests. The 

plants said that this would not be a problem. 

EPA said that Mr. Chin and Mr. French were planning to meet with local 

community groups in Ohio (that meeting has since been postponed). While in the 

area, they might want to visit one or both plants. Also, the Sierra Club 

representatives would also like to visit the plants. The plants responded that EPA 

should put in a formal request regarding the Sierra Club visitors. 

The plants said that they would like to have more certainty regarding an extension 

past December 2012.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: December 10, 2012

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0334

FROM: Penny Lassiter, EPA

SUBJECT: Documentation of U.S. EPA Discussion with American Chemistry Council 

(ACC) Regarding Title V Permit Applicability

The purpose of this memorandum is to document a telephone conversation between Penny 

Lassiter of EPA and Leslie Hulse and Lorraine Gershman at ACC. On December 10, 2012, Ms. 

Lassiter called to follow up with ACC about the email that Ms. Gershman sent to EPA on 

December 6, 2012 regarding applicability of title V. That email and attachments are attached to 

this memorandum.
THe STATer &f text* . ^ 

### (AoTIpa) "Poa. CLERKS Recofcfr/ ftcfbgiat RecofcS To T&£ foocft.fc"SL£ SosTlcei Cfc JSkvb U>o*J\ 

## CotAESrtou); ?*W1L iWoc*fA£p*lLIfro <*_ "u* <L-. fcUt*. s>fyfc-i kv^jL aJOVaW^A ca*?ic- ©r «mAvod a-a! C'Acs *tV^ <vu>rw»* tor JttoeMntL
1.



## "^rodfie.1 Cdos ^V**~ "^* An^SCr^tr is N*2e_ieJ- £>/ iv/i e.&acV»C- Li^Sfc. 

## Df WfJtJ. . V.-Ur i/» NlortU (phoU* ^(04 0*^. ZU.,12-7 G<H() IE. 

## \ \" i! * v^ ^^ ^^^ ^E*"s ^ t:> ^ f^0^ iv*. ^i,wV t°W\"-\ °^ L^ S^^ *^e\\«vV J>roa^. IV^ll^ A\rt-\aW^ i\JU -IVvc Vx«A CourV U^^ oA P»^e^| no- \>lbd.-H*^^^Ot, ^ &jU*lly ^"(ei 

## -U> "biDc-H-ioisio. iu^4>^r ^pJlftJt e^c^^ 1U. fcc^^l 4o ^CL«L U\.ftfucs» l;^VA,>vi oi 0V Ok-lots'-2SC. 

## {WU<Jc W Or:4U- V^ 1U T*wlv koX VrwWct 6U,k H k/«JLi U TU^ CooA Ce*WH- ft ) *> Aoauv-V IM. loir **1 

## bft^toorV 4^^ DcV. XI, 1o& ^ufS^-V W Toe.?-ft»p.fr. tM.U



## Utt"Cit"PO^€ ^E^VS&S CDtZUb&LZb , -tU Af|>ell**A f>r<vfS "fUV iU. &>0r^ CreA^T Ttas. (AoTio^ "Foe- /weULtfTE: £eco£4 p^l $u^o

### Vroc^A^o^ *«A 4oT V»~r -U> \a*- ^>ev;k -Cre-*- "H—«- T^^i* Coo^y LtNAjtrvV -£ov>A$ ^ TL*. fc*w©u-vT S^T 4-W lL<. Av**V. toi;rr' hgX..£-


# £**<uAri o^> "tVJ* 1_ 4*y cA ^v^W ^ 1W ^*,r Z^IT. 

# a> -^ -^ k^ <A Zoi^ , L*^ 4o U. U-^ 1 <L« *^>JJawAx> fllolio^ "Foe, ileum'5 to.oe.fr /tePoeTeg-. g.ELp£h

Q^^Vvt-^- ^ftSI i-«-^V 

### ± T-oVT-

### Court ofAppeals THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547 www.ixcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx (512) 463-1733
JEFFL. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE SCOTTK. FIELD, JUSTICE CINDYOLSONB0URLAND, JUSTICE Mr. PatrickHeaney TDCJ ID #1987843 Dominguez Unit 6535 Cagnon Road San Antonio, TX 78252 August 10,2015

RE: Court ofAppeals Number: 03-15-00470-CR Trial Court Case Number: D-1 -DC-14-205206 Style: PatrickHeaney v. The State ofTexas Dear Mr. Heaney: 

## A

In response to your correspondence dated August 6,2015, please be advised that in all criminal cases, the clerk and reporter must file the record in duplicate, and the record mustbe retained by the trial court clerk. The trial court clerk is required to furnish a copy ofthe record if Tcquestedbyaproselitigant. SeeTex.R. App. P^343(gXand34.6(h). Appellantshouidmakea written request to the districtclerk and send it to the following address: Honorable Velva Price Travis County District Clerk P.O. Box 679003 Austin, Texas 78767-9003 Very truly yours, JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK BY: &. ,!%*&** LizTalerico, Deputy Clerk cc: The Honorable Rosemary Lehmberg

## Cos)A A A^eJtx cWk- /Jo\*~-L>T l^ ~L.°uT



# frlk,T^ ^ y^ /<ou^t.

—

T 

### J^-i «j v»y - /'bri'- - - — — a "7 

## fr*AtT *fl fr*_$*-.

NOV 0 5 2015 #*V 

## X** rwW;,(lA jq.g>ii:z^•si 0) •siHHw in •si •si
#### PARKER v. STATE.

No. 22578.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 23, 1943.

Rehearing Denied Oct 13, 1943.

J. S. Bracewell, of Houston, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty before the court, appellant was convicted of aggravated assault and his punishment assessed at six months’ imprisonment in the county jail.

The information appears to be in proper form. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exceptions. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice No. 3437] 

The Advisory Panel to the United States Section of the North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission will meet on October 29, 2000, at the Imperial Hotel, 1-1-1, Uchisaiwaicho, Chiyoda-ky, Tokyo 100-8558, Japan. This session will involve discussion of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission, to be held on October 30—November 2, 2000. The discussion will begin at 7:00 p.m. and is closed to the public. 

The members of the Advisory Panel will examine various options for the U.S. position at the Eighth Annual Meeting. These considerations must necessarily involve review of sensitive matters, the disclosure of which would frustrate U.S. participation at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, the determination has been made to close the 7:00 p.m. meeting pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. Section 552b(c)(9). 

Requests for further information on the meeting should be directed to Ms. Sally Cochran, International Relations Officer, Office of Marine Conservation (OES/OMC), Room 5806, U.S. Department of State, Washington, D.C. 20520-7818. Ms. Cochran can be reached by telephone on (202) 647-2883 or by FAX (202) 736-7350. 

Dated: October 11, 2000. 

Mary Beth West, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Fisheries, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 00-26775 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
[Cite as State v. Gold, 2013-Ohio-5813.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO 

STATE OF OHIO, : O P I N I O N 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, :

CASE NO. 2012-P-0134

 - vs - :

KANDI R. GOLD, :

 Defendant-Appellee. :

Criminal Appeal from the Portage County Municipal Court, Ravenna Division, Case No. 

R2012 TRC 07082. 

Judgment: Reversed and remanded. 

Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, and Pamela J. Holder, Assistant 

Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellant). 

Brian L. Coffman, 159 South Main Street, Suite 808, Akron, OH 44308 (For 

Defendant-Appellee). 

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J. 

{¶1} This accelerated calendar appeal is from an order of the Portage County 

Municipal Court, Ravenna Division, granting the motion to suppress the results of a 

breath test performed on an Intoxilyzer 8000. Appellant, the State of Ohio, contends 

that the trial court erred in allowing appellee, Kandi R. Gold, to raise a general attack 

upon the reliability of the breath test machine, and assigns the following error: 
 2

{¶2} “The Portage County Municipal Court erred as a matter of law by 

permitting a general attack on the scientific reliability of the Intoxilyzer 8000 contrary to 

Ohio statutes and well-established case law.” 

{¶3} As a threshold matter, we note that appellee styled her challenge to the 

reliability of the breath test machine as a motion in limine rather a motion to suppress. 

“The determination of whether a motion is a ‘motion to suppress’ or a ‘motion in limine’ 

does not depend on what it is labeled. It depends on the type of relief it seeks to 

obtain.” State v. Davidson, 17 Ohio St.3d 132, 135 (1985). Thus, despite the caption, 

our review of appellee’s motion to exclude the Intoxilyzer 8000 results indicates that it 

was, in fact, a motion to suppress, which if granted, would diminish appellant’s ability to 

prosecute her. Id. 

{¶4} Pursuant to this court’s en banc judgment and opinion in State v. 

Bergman, 11th Dist. Portage 2012-P-0124, 2013-Ohio-___, appellant’s assignment of 

error has merit. The trial court’s judgment is reversed, and remanded for further 

proceedings. 

TIMOTHY P. CANNON, P.J., 

COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J., 

concur.
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 31
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marlton Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert B.
Ginsburg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen P. Rolf, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on their
knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ Robert B. Ginsburg                            /s/ Stephen P. Rolf
-----------------------                           -------------------
Robert B. Ginsburg                                Stephen P. Rolf
Chief Executive Officer                           Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2003                                   August 12, 2003
# GPS ERV, Inc.

621 Brookhaven Drive · Orlando, FL 32803 Toll Free 888·782·1997 · Local 407·601·5816 · Fax 407·601·5826 February 24, 2016
U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Application for Amendment to Exemption 12231, GPServ, Inc., FAA Docket 2015- 1914

Dear Sir or Madam: On May 12, 2015 and supplemented on June 12, 2015, GPServ, Inc. (hereinafter “GPSI”), applied for the issuance of an exemption under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (“Reform Act”) based upon Exemption 11110 issued to Trimble Navigation Limited (“Trimble”) on December 10, 2014, as amended on May 7, 2015 with issuance of Exemption 11110A in FAA Docket 2014-0367. On July 30, 2015 the FAA issued Exemption 12231 to GPSI for the operation of the Trimble UX5 and UX5 hp unmanned aircraft with updated standard terms and conditions. This letter is a further request for an amendment to add the following aircraft to the amended Exemption 12231 for commercial use in aerial data collection:


### Trimble ZX5 The Trimble ZX5 is a rotorcraft weighing a maximum of 11 lbs. at takeoff (in any event, less than 55 lbs.), with payload. It will not operate at a speed greater than 87 knots. Preflight maintenance will be accomplished as set forth in the Operations Manual submitted confidentially with this application. The listed aircraft will be operated in accordance with the procedures set forth in the manuals listed above and submitted confidentially. The FAA has issued exemption grants in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in this petition. In Exemption No. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No. FAA

### − 2014 

### − 0352), No. 11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA 

### − 2014 

### − 0507), No. 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see Docket No. FAA 

### − 2014 

### − 0382), and No. 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA

### − 2014 

### − 0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (“UA”) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gave the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation at issue was in the public interest.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6645]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Publicly Available Consumer Product 
Safety Information Database

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety Commission (Commission) is 
announcing that a collection of information entitled Publicly Available 
Consumer Product Safety Information Database has been approved by the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Glatz, Division of Policy and 
Planning, Office of Information Technology and Technology Services, 
Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
MD 20814; telephone: (301) 504-7671 or by e-mail to lglatz@cpsc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of May 24, 2010, 75 
FR 29156, the agency announced that the proposed information collection 
had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 
3501-3520. A final rule was published in the Federal Register of 
December 9, 2010, 75 FR 76832. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, 
and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information 
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now 
approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 
3041-0146. The approval expires on January 31, 2014. A copy of the 
supporting statement for this information collection is available on 
the Internet at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-6645 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
#### R. L. BROCK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27135.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 20, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of unlawfully operating a motor vehicle upon a . public highway while .under the influence of intoxicating liquor; the penalty assessed is a fine of $60 and confinement in the county jail for three days.

Since perfecting his appeal the appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified, requesting the dismissal thereof. The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed:
# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Correction. 

# SUMMARY:

This order corrects Public Land Order No. 7416, 65 FR 67295-67297, published December 1, 1999, as FR Doc. 99-31202. .

                        On page 67297, in the first column, under T. 24 S., R. 15 W., remove sec. 5, lot 1 and SE                        1/4                        NE                        1/4                        , and after T. 24 S., R. 15 W., sec. 23, NE                        1/4                        NW                        1/4                        , add T. 24 S., R. 15 E., sec. 5, lot 1 and SE                        1/2                        NE                        1/4                        .                    

Dated: January 28, 2000.

Carsten F. Goff,

Deputy State Director. 

[FR Doc. 00-2699  Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. M ANU SORENSEN, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-10389

D.C . No. 1:14-c r-00030-LEK M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ha

wa ii Le slie E . Koba

y a shi, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d April 13, 2016 ** B e fore : FARRIS, TALLM AN, a n d B YB EE, C i rc uit Judge s. M anu Sore nse n a

ppe a ls from

the re v oc ation of supervise d re le a se and the 11-m onth se nte nc e im

pose d upon re voc ation. Pursua n t to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Sorense n’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f sta ting tha t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

w a s c o unse l of re c ord. W e have



# FIL ED APR 18 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).provide d Sore nse n the opportunity to file a pro se supple m e n ta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Our inde pe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua n t to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 1 0 3 8 9 2
Exhibit 99.1



                                      13
<PAGE>




COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-2


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
     such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                   Dated: March 27, 2003

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT
AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER


/s/ Mark Wong                              Dated: March 27, 2003

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT






                                      14
<PAGE>
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5738 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 15285 Samohin Drive in Macomb, Michigan, 

as the ‘‘Lance Cpl. Anthony A. DiLisio Clinton-Macomb 

Carrier Annex’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5738 EH

1 SECTION 1. LANCE CPL. ANTHONY A. DILISIO CLINTON2 MACOMB CARRIER ANNEX. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 15285 Samohin Drive in 

5 Macomb, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Lance Cpl. Anthony A. DiLisio Clinton-Macomb Carrier 

7 Annex’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lance Cpl. Anthony 

12 A. DiLisio Clinton-Macomb Carrier Annex’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 28, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5738 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostA. DiLisio Clinton-Macomb Carrier Annex’’. Macomb, Michigan, as the ‘‘Lance Cpl. Anthony al Service located at 15285 Samohin Drive in
MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 399TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on October 15, 2014, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment between

Carli McGaa, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-14-00052-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2013CR1004

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the 

trial court is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth 

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, 

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on March 9, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853