alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Swank, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  August 12, 2003 | /s/ John A. Tulin             
|----------------------- | ------------------------------
|                        |                               
|                        | John A. Tulin, President      
|                        | (Chief Executive Officer)     
|                        |                               
|                        |                               
|Dated:  August 12, 2003 | /s/ Jerold R. Kassner         
|                        |                               
|                        | Jerold R. Kassner, Senior Vice
|                        | President and Treasurer       
|                        | (Chief Financial Officer)     





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Swank, Inc. and will be retained by Swank, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
ONGOING and Past SATISFACTION SURVEYS UNDER 1845-0045

Dated 6/21/2013

1

Annual Direct Loan School Customer Satisfaction Survey

Training Information Services Division – TISD Training and follow-up surveys

FAFSA on the Web (FOTW) Survey

Loan Choice for FFEL Borrowers Survey

Tools for School Training Survey

Federal Student Aid Awareness Survey

Student Aid and Applicant Services Survey

FFEL Borrower Servicing Survey

Long Beach Awareness Survey

EDExpress Use Survey 

EDExpress Basics Survey 

Quality Assurance Program Survey

Editorial Services Customer Satisfaction Survey

Fall Conference Survey

Defaulted Loan Survey

Social Media Survey

Multiple Servicers Satisfaction Survey (3)

Fundamentals of Title IV Training Survey

Ombudsman Customer Satisfaction Survey

FSA for Counselors Training Survey

Student Aid on the Web (SAOTW) Survey

Enterprise Operational Change Management Customer Satisfaction Survey

SA Pubs Focus Group Feedback Guide

FSA Communications Messaging Customer Service Survey
ONGOING and Past SATISFACTION SURVEYS UNDER 1845-0045

Dated 6/21/2013

2

Customer Satisfaction Survey for the Quality Assurance Program

Ease of Doing Business with FSA-School Partners Customer Satisfaction Survey

Creative Review Focus Groups

Online Interviews to Evaluate Website and Social Media Site

Website Usability Testing

Leadership and Management Seminar Evaluation

Optional Point-of-Service Online Customer Satisfaction Survey for Accenture Use with School Services’ 

and Applicant Services’ Customers: January 2013

MSURSD -Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Utilization Survey

Federal Student Aid 2013 Awareness and Outreach Survey (Peers, Trainer, and Customer)

Pell Grant Experiments School Satisfaction Survey 

Integrated Student Experience Web Experience Focus Group

In School Survey

School Partners Survey

Financial Awareness Counseling Tool (FACT) Survey

Federal Student Aid Information Center (FSAIC) Survey

Borrowers in Grace Survey
1

Schaeffer, John

From: Lin, Chuantung

Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:00 AM

To: Schaeffer, John; Boethling, Bob

Cc: Lewis, Paul; Williamson, Tracy; Christian, Myrta

Subject: RE: 22527-63-5 HPV 3 submissions -- M/FP BP VP WS Log P biodeg

Hi John, 

I have reviewed the submitted test data (Freezing Point, Boiling Point, Vapor Pressure, Log P, and Water 

Solubility endpoints) for the HPV3 chemical, 22527-63-5. All these data and test methods are adequate and 

acceptable to EPA. However, it needs to be noted that the test sample used for these testings was not a 100 

% pure substance. Instead, it was a mixture chemicals which contained: 

1) Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3-(benzoyloxy)-2,2,4-trimethylpentyl ester [22527-63-5] (68.8 %) - This 

chemical is the titled HPV3 Test substance

2) 1,3-Pentanediol, 2,2,4-trimethyl-, 1 ,3-dibenzoate [68052-23-3] (19.5 %) 

3) 2,2,4-trimethyl-1 ,3-pentanediol, diisobutyrate [6846-50-0 ] (7 %) 

4) Misc. esters (4.2 %) 

5) Volatiles (0.5%) 

If I remembered correctly that ICB had provided comments before on the proposed test sample (a mixture of 

three chemicals (#1 -#3) listed above) that the Sponsor proposed to be used for the HPV3 Test Rule 

requirements for all these five endpoints. However, I am not sure whether EPA has finally agreed and 

accepted on such approach (i.e. using the mixture of the three chemicals) to fulfill the testing requirements 

for this HPV 3 Test Chemical. 

Please let me know if you have other question. 

Thanks! 

Daniel 

From: Schaeffer, John 

Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:59 AM 

To: Lin, Chuantung; Boethling, Bob 

Cc: Lewis, Paul 

Subject: 22527-63-5 HPV 3 submissions -- M/FP BP VP WS Log P biodeg 

Daniel, Bob, good morning. 

Attached for your respective reviews are physical-chemical properties endpoint studies and a ready biodegradation 

study for the HPV3 test rule chemical Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3-(benzoyloxy)-2,2,4-trimethylpentyl ester (CASRN 

22527-63-5). The submissions contain the following: 

Physical Chemical Properties 

• Freezing Point (OECD 102) 

• Boiling Point (ASTM E 1719-05) 

• Vapor Pressure (ASTM E 1782-08) 
2

• Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient (ASTM E 1147-92) 

• Water Solubility (40 FR 799.6784) 

Environmental Fate – Ready Biodegradation 

• Ready Biodegradation (ISO 9408:1999(E)) 

Please review these for data adequacy/acceptability by EPA. Please also let me know when we can anticipate receiving 

your reviews. 

Thank you. 

John Schaeffer 

Senior Biologist 

USEPA/OPPT/CCD/CITB 

1201 Constitution Ave, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Mail Code: 7405M 

Phone: 202-564-8173
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of AXT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wilson W. Cheung,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”),that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: March 18, 2005 | /s/ WILSON W.  CHEUNG     |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|
|                      | Wilson W. Cheung          |
|                      | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 

for the 

PUBLIC HEARING and SUBMISSION 

Hearing held on May 24, 2007 in Elkton, Maryland 

in relation to: 

Cecil County, Maryland 8-Hour OZtlne State Implementation Plan.and Base Year 

Inventory 

NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED AT THE HEARING OR DURING THE 

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD 

1
EXHIBIT 10.25

January 29,
2002

Ms. Michelle
Moratti
21 Jean Court
Greenlawn, New York 11740

Dear
Michelle,

This
letter confirms the agreement between TenFold Corporation ("TenFold") and Michelle Moratti
("Moratti") to amend the Employment Agreement, entered into as of August 1, 2001, between TenFold and Moratti (the
"Agreement"), as follows (capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned thereto in the Agreement):

Section 4(i) of
the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

"DEPOSITED FUNDS. The Company agrees to deposit into a separate Company bank account one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) (the "Deposited Funds"). In
the event that prior to August 20, 2002, (a) a voluntary receiver, voluntary trustee, or other voluntary custodian is applied for, consented to, or appointed for the Company or its
assets, (b) an involuntary application proceeding for a receiver, trustee or other custodian for the Company is initiated by a third party, and such involuntary application proceeding is not
dismissed within 60 days after the initiation thereof, (c) the Company becomes insolvent or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, (d) the Company is liquidated or
dissolved, (e) or any proceedings are commenced by or against the Company under any bankruptcy, insolvency or debtor's relief law, (f) or the Company begins to take action to effect any
of the foregoing (collectively, a "Release Condition"), Employee shall be entitled to the Deposited Funds and such Deposited Funds shall be deemed a signing bonus under the terms of this Agreement.
Employee's right to the Deposited Funds and the Company's obligation to maintain such a separate Company bank account expire if a Release Condition has not occurred by August 21, 2002."

Except
as expressly amended by this letter agreement, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. All references to the Agreement in the Agreement or any other
document executed or delivered in connection therewith shall, from and after the effective date of this letter agreement, be deemed to be references to the Agreement, as amended hereby, unless the
context expressly requires otherwise.

Please
acknowledge your agreement to the terms of this letter by countersigning this letter in the space provided below and returning one original to TenFold. The other original is for your retention.

Sincerely,

Nancy
M. Harvey
President and CEO

ACKNOWLEDGED
AND AGREED:

|Michelle Moratti |  | 
|---------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.A








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James C. Yardley, Chairman of the Board and President, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ James C. YardleyJames C. YardleyChairman of the Board and President(Principal Executive Officer)Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company






August 7, 2009
















A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and will be retained by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 205 (Monday, October 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27098]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-40-000]


Cove Point LNG Limited Partnership; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 17, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 11, 2000, Cove Point LNG Limited 
Partnership (Cove Point) filed in compliance with Order No. 587-L.
    Cove Point states that it is a natural gas storage facility and has 
no imbalance provisions. Cove Point states that pursuant to Order 
Granting Clarification, issued September 28, 2000, in Docket No. RM96-
1-016, Cove Point is not required to implement imbalance trading on its 
system.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance 
with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and 
Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance 
with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm 
(call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27098 Filed 10-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order: 2014-6-5

Issued June 11, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 11th day of June, 2014

 Essential Air Service at

 INTRA ALASKA BUSH MAIL RATES

Under 49 U.S. C. § 41901 et seq.

 DOCKET DOT-OST-2003-14694

 

 

Order Establishing Effective Dates

Summary

By Order 2014-5-16, issued on May 30, 2014, the Department made final the terminal and 

line-haul rates tentatively set by Order 2014-4-11, issued on April 10, 2014. However, we 

neglected to set an effective date, which is typically the second Saturday after the issuance of 

the Order. Therefore, by this Order, we are setting the effective dates as June 7, 2014.

Final Line-Haul Rates per Revenue Ton Mile (RTM) and Terminal Rates per Ton Enplaned. 

ACCORDINGLY,

1. We make final the rate of $5.1992 per mail revenue ton mile for regular1 19-seat Part 121 

operations, effective June 7, 2014, until the next annual update;

2. We make final the rate of $15.3414 per mail revenue ton mile for Part 135 aircraft and 

aircraft having fewer than 19-seats, effective June 7, 2014, until the next annual update;

 1 As discussed in Order 2006-8-27 and 2006-11-15, if an air carrier introduced 19-seat Part 121 operations with 

STOL aircraft, it will receive the Part 135 rate until we have sufficient data to calculate the appropriate SR-121 rate.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Fuel Nonfuel Total Fuel Nonfuel Total Fuel Nonfuel Total

Part 121 $ 1.4876 $ 4.2600 $ 5.7476 $ 1.3092 $ 3.8900 $ 5.1992 -11.99% -8.69% -9.54%

Part 135 $ 4.5191 $10.4150 $ 14.9341 $ 4.4950 $10.8464 $ 15.3414 -0.53% 4.14% 2.73%

Seaplane $ 6.3505 $26.2478 $ 32.5983 $ 6.8840 $24.1305 $ 31.0145 8.40% -8.07% -4.86%

Terminal NA NA $ 850.03 NA NA $ 878.26 NA NA 3.32%

Previous Rate Final Rate Percent Change
3. We make final the rate of $31.0145 per mail revenue ton mile for seaplane operations, 

effective June 7, 2014, until the next annual update;

4. We make final the rate of $878.26 per mail ton enplaned for bush aircraft operations, 

effective June 7, 2014, until the next annual update; and

6. We will serve this Order on the parties to this proceeding. 

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of this Order under the Department’s

Regulations, 14 CFR Part 385.31(a), must file such petitions within seven (7) days after the date 

of service of this Order.

This Order will be effective immediately, and the filing of a petition for review shall not 

preclude its effectiveness.

By:

 TODD M. HOMAN 

Director 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

(SEAL)

 An electronic version of this document is available at

 http://www.regulations.gov
# National Forest Products Week, 2000

In the early years of the 20th century, President Theodore Roosevelt challenged his fellow citizens to begin the vital task of conserving the precious natural resources with which America has been so abundantly blessed. As part of his notable conservation achievements, he consolidated 65 million acres of Federal forest reserves into the National Forest System and created the United States Forest Service to provide wise stewardship of these lands for future generations.

Today, the National Forest System comprises more than 190 million acres of forests and grasslands, a priceless remnant of the great wilderness that once stretched across our country. Whether sustaining ecosystems, supplying water, providing lumber, or offering recreation, these precious areas benefit millions of Americans.

We must continue to sustain the health and beauty of the forestlands President Roosevelt first set aside for us so many decades ago. I am proud that my Administration has made significant progress in improving the management of Federal forestlands. With science-based planning and research, we have sought to achieve a balance between strengthening protections for wildlife and water quality and providing a steady, sustainable supply of the building materials, paper products, and other commodities we need to meet the challenges of our growing economy.

America's forests have always offered us unique and irreplaceable benefits. They are a treasured inheritance, and we must ensure in this new century that our policies and actions sustain this precious legacy for the prosperity and well-being of generations to come.

To recognize the importance of our forests in ensuring the long-term welfare of our Nation, the Congress, by Public Law 86-753 (36 U.S.C. 123), has designated the week beginning on the third Sunday in October of each year as “National Forest Products Week” and has authorized and requested the President to issue a proclamation in observance of this week.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim October 15 through October 21, 2000, as National Forest Products Week. I call upon all Americans to observe this week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 00-27112

Billing code 3195-01-P
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12-15297

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00048-SDM-TGW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIE C. TONEY, 

a.k.a. Anthony Toney, 

a.k.a. Tony, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(August 12, 2013)

Before HULL, MARCUS and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 12-15297 Date Filed: 08/12/2013 Page: 1 of 3 
2

Willie Toney appeals his 262-month sentence for possessing a firearm as a 

convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(e), arguing it is 

substantively unreasonable in light of the record and the sentencing factors set 

forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). After careful review, we affirm.

We review the substantive reasonableness of a sentence for an abuse of

discretion. United States v. Irey, 612 F.3d 1160, 1188-89 (11th Cir. 2010) (en 

banc). “The party challenging the sentence bears the burden to show it is 

unreasonable in light of the record and the § 3553(a) factors.” United States v. 

Tome, 611 F.3d 1371, 1378 (11th Cir. 2010).

Toney has not met his burden of demonstrating that his sentence was 

unreasonable. His sentence was within his guidelines range and we ordinarily 

expect a guidelines sentence to be reasonable. See United States v. Talley, 431 

F.3d 784, 788 (11th Cir. 2005). The court considered the statutory factors and 

discussed several of them in detail, including: the nature and circumstances of 

Toney’s offense (threatening his girlfriend, punching her pregnant daughter in the 

face, pointing a knife at his girlfriend’s niece, and firing two gunshots in front of 

his girlfriend’s residence); Toney’s history and characteristics, including his prior 

convictions for several violent offenses; and the need for a lengthy sentence to 

promote respect for the law, deter Toney’s criminal conduct, and protect the 

public. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Although Toney contends that his advanced age 

Case: 12-15297 Date Filed: 08/12/2013 Page: 2 of 3 
3

and history of mental health issues warranted a below-guidelines sentence, the 

district court considered these arguments and concluded the countervailing 

considerations required a longer term of imprisonment. We cannot say this 

determination was an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Amedeo, 487 F.3d 

823, 832 (11th Cir. 2007) (“The weight to be accorded any given § 3553(a) factor 

is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the district court, and we will not 

substitute our judgment in weighing the relevant factors.” (alterations and internal 

quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 12-15297 Date Filed: 08/12/2013 Page: 3 of 3