alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 I, James M. Papada, III, Chief Executive Officer of Technitrol,
Inc.,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March
 27, 2009 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully
 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and(2)
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
 Technitrol, Inc.  Dated: May
4, 2009
/s/ James M.
 Papada, IIIJames M.
 Papada, III A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will
be retained by Technitrol, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates,
is
not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5681 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Reactive Yellow 7459. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Reactive 

Yellow 7459. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REACTIVE YELLOW 7459. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.46 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Reactive Yellow 7459) is amended by striking the date in 

7 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5681 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 63044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26947]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2324, MM Docket No. 00-201, RM-9919]


Digital Television Broadcast Service; Portsmouth, VA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Viacom 
Broadcasting of Seattle, Inc., licensee of station WGNT-TV, NTSC 
channel 27, Portsmouth, Virginia, requesting the substitution of DTV 
channel 50 for station WGNT-TV's assigned DTV channel 19. DTV Channel 
50 can be allotted to Portsmouth, Virginia, in compliance with the 
principle community coverage requirements of Section 73.625(a) at 
reference coordinates (36-48-43 N. and 76-27-49 W.). As requested, we 
propose to allot DTV Channel 50 to Portsmouth with a power of 800 and a 
height above average terrain (HAAT) of 296 meters.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before December 8, 2000, and reply 
comments on or before December 26, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with 
the FCC, interested parties should serve the petitioner, or its counsel 
or consultant, as follows: Raymond A. White, Viacom Broadcasting of 
Seattle, Inc., c/o Paramount Stations Group, Inc., 5202 River Road, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20816 (Counsel for Viacom Broadcasting of Seattle, 
Inc.).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 00-201, adopted October 
16, 2000, and released October 17, 2000. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-26947 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Dennis OBrien, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Silver Mines, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-a5(f)) for the Registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within this entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 4, 2010

By:    /s/ Dennis OBrien



Dennis OBrien, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer



---
NO. 07-05-0226-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL B JANUARY

25, 2006

______________________________ IN RE P. L. L. , a Minor C hild

_________________________________ FROM THE 140 th DISTRIC T COURT O F LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 97-558,673; HON. PATRICIA MOSELY, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Memorandum Opinion

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Eddie Lee W iggins (Wiggins) appeals from an order confirming a non-agreed child support review

order in w hich he was ordered to pay

additional ch ild support. His two issues revolve around the lack of a reporter’ s record of the he aring w hich he had requested and the absence of ev idence supporti ng the decisio n to increase his support obl igation. W e overrule each and aff irm the trial court’s order. Regarding the absence of a repor ter’s reco rd, Wiggins argues that through no fault of his own, there is none. Thus, he wasdeprived o f an effective appeal. While there is no reporter’s record, the t rial court ’s order indicated on i ts face that an audio recording was made of the hearing. Also of recor d is an affidavi t from the administr ative assi stant to the associate judge indi cating thatthe audio recor ding actuall y exis ts. Furthermore, Wiggins alludes to the e xistence o f the recording in his appell ate brief. Acourt reporter is not required in a hearing before an asso ciate judge in a suit2

affecting the parent/child relat ionship unless the judge pr

esides over

a jury t rial or a final termination hearin g. T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN
. §201.009(a) (Ver non 2002); In re B.R.G., 48 S.W.3d 812, 816-17 (Tex . App.–El Paso 2001 , no pet.). No one a rgues that the case before us arose from a final termination hear ing or a jury trial. And, when a reporter is not present, the record may be preserved by any other m eans approved by the assoc iate judge. T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN
. §201.009(b)&(c ) (Vernon 2002) ; In re B.R.G., 48 S.W.3d at 817. Moreover , statute entitl es a party to obtain the pre sence of a repo rte r if one is not provided by

the court. T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN . § 201.009(b) ( Vernon 2002). W hile Wiggins may have a sked, sever al weeks before the hearing, that a reporter be present, he fail s to direct us t o anywher e in the recor

d where he ob

jected to the absence of one. Nor does he direct us to anything of record ill ustrating that he was denied opportunity

to obtain his own reporter as allow ed by statute. And, he fails to e xplain w hy the audio recordi ng made of the evidence does not suffice . Under these circumstances,
we can neither find that the lack of a r epor ter’s rec ord was er ror nor that appellant was harmed even if s uch error oc curred. As to t he want of evi dence supporting the court’s decision, w e find the matter waived

. Wiggins did not ex plain why the evidenc e captured on the a udio record ing was insufficient. Nor did he cite us to any portion of that r

ecord. Thus, t he matte r was insufficiently

briefed and, therefor

e, waiv ed. Accordingl y, we affirm the order of the tr ial court.

Per Curiam
Exhibit 32.01




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biglari Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 13, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Sardar BiglariSardar Biglari

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 May 20, 2011
 
 
 
 /s/ Duane E. GeigerDuane E. Geiger

Interim Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Controller
 May 20, 2011
ONLINE COMMENTS TEMPLATE

The deadline to submit a comment is July 27, 2015.

Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2015

- 0111

Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mailcode: 2822T 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

To Whom It May Concern:

My name is Kyle Nixon and I live in Omaha

, NE

. I am the Gener al Manager for Novozymes at our plant

in Blair Nebraska. We provide enzymes solely for ethanol plants. I am writing in support of the

Renewabl e Fuel Standard (RFS) and I hope you will consider my comments when making your decision.

I support a strong federal RFS because we need more alternatives to our transportation fuel supply. A diverse transportation fuel supply means lower greenhouse gas emissions, greater economic

devel opment and jobs here in America. It also means lower gas prices and greater national security

.

On May 29, the EPA released its proposed rule for 2014, 2015 and 2016 renewable volume obligations under the RFS. The EPA has p roposed reducing the oil industry’s obligation to blend renewable fuel in to gasoline

.

That directly contradicts the EPA’s other efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

. This proposal would increase g reenhouse gas emissions by almost 10 million metric tons , the same effect as putting

2.1 million more cars on the road

.

In the final rule, EPA should require obligated partie s to comply with the law by blend ing increasing

volumes of renewable fuel s

.

Novozymes chose Blair Ne over several different locatio ns globally. The reason was simple. There was a market for enzyme s in the ethanol indu stry and Blair is in a centralized location

close to our customers. One of the drivers of that market is the RFS. Because of that market

, Novozymes has invested over $200 million into our new plant in Blair. I was there from the beginning and watched as we built this plant from the ground up and now have over 115 employees. Those employees came to Novozymes to better their lives and work for a Company

that cares abou t the environment. At Novozymes we strive daily to reduce our use of water and energy and have made this a goal for all of our pla nts globally. As a company we strive to support our local communities. We help with funding to our local community college s o that students in Blair and the surrounding communities have choices when they graduate. We support local events and want to be an integral part of our community. I see how our employees care about our Company and appreciate where they work and where th ey live. I have witnessed how we have changed lives and improved the economy for the city of Blair and for the State of Nebraska. We also built this plant for growth but that is only possible if the market continues to

grow. The RFS plays a strong role in continuing what we started.

Please change the final proposal so that it complies with the existing law and continues to diversify our national fuel supply with low carbon, sustainable biofuels

.

Sincerely,

Kyle Nixon
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          76,506
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  282,987
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,548
<INVENTORY>                                    333,444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               698,862
<PP&E>                                       1,172,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                 693,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,688,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          320,258
<BONDS>                                        569,960
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        797
<COMMON>                                        11,009
<OTHER-SE>                                     655,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,688,408
<SALES>                                        427,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               427,793
<CGS>                                          343,464
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  343,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   820
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   332
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,222
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,222
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               4
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      253
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   335
<PP&E>                                           4,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              548
<BONDS>                                          1,354
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,061
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   360
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  61
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    129
<INCOME-TAX>                                        43
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 86
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        86
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the consolidated financial statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

### Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

### As Adopted Pursuant to

### Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

---

In connection with the
quarterly report of Pathmark Stores, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended May 1, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the  Report), I, Frank G. Vitrano, President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:



| | (1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in  all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this
written statement required by  Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the  signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written  statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained  by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon  request.

| |                      | /s/ Frank G. Vitrano                                              
| | -------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:    Title:Date: | Frank G. VitranoPresident and Chief Financial Officer
June 7, 2004
#### Henry Thomas POWERS, alias Buck Powers, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27315.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 27, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for the offense of rape; the punishment, ten years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has now filed his personal affidavit requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The request is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 3, 2013

t0826

Order 

Clerk

September 3, 2013

146992

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146992

COA: 309492

Eaton CC: 10-020234-FH

CHARLES PATRICK CRATTY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.