alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(h), of the receipt of exempt and prohibited off-the-record communications.

Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission decisional employees, who make or receive an exempt or a prohibited off-the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested on-the-record proceeding, to deliver a copy of the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any oral communication, to the Secretary.

Prohibited communications will be included in a public, non-decisional file associated with, but not part of, the decisional record of the proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited communication and any responses thereto should become part of the decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant such requests only when it determines that fairness so requires.

Exempt off-the-record communications will be included in the decisional record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR 385.2201(e)(1)(v).

The following is a list of exempt and prohibited off-the-record communications received in the Office of the Secretary within the preceding 14 days. The documents may be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-2649 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Form 10-Q of Worldwide Biotech & Pharmaceutical Company
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Peiyi Tian, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











/s/ Peiyi
Tian


Peiyi
Tian


Principal
Accounting Officer


May 15,
2009
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2712 

To provide certain requirements for the licensing of commercial nuclear 

facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2013 

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself and Mr. ENGEL) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide certain requirements for the licensing of 

commercial nuclear facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Power Licens5 ing Reform Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 

8 U.S.C. 2133) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection b., by inserting ‘‘, including 

10 that the facility does not pose an unreasonable 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2712 IH

1 threat to persons or the environment because of 

2 safety or security vulnerabilities (including vulner3 ability to terrorist attacks), and that there exist ade4 quate evacuation plans for emergency events and 

5 that those plans have been approved by the relevant 

6 Federal agencies and States within 50 miles of the 

7 facility’’ after ‘‘by rule establish’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection c., by adding at the end the 

9 following: ‘‘Any such renewal shall be subject to the 

10 same criteria and requirements that would be appli11 cable for an original application for initial construc12 tion, and the Commission shall ensure that any 

13 changes in the size or distribution of the sur14 rounding population, or seismic or other scientific 

15 data not available at time of original licensing, have 

16 not resulted in the facility being located at a site at 

17 which a new facility would not be allowed to be 

18 built.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Marianne Molleur, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StockerYale, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer
and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in
this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: May 15, 2007     
|                       
|/s/ Marianne Molleur   
|Marianne Molleur       
|Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

TERRY BLACK’S BARBECUE, LLC and § 

TERRY BLACK’S BARBECUE DALLAS, § 

LLC, § 

§ 

Plaintiffs, § 

§ 

v. § 1:20-CV-665-RP

§ 

STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL § 

INSURANCE COMPANY and § 

RUCKER-OHLENDORF INSURANCE § 

AGENCY, § 

§ 

Defendants. § 

FINAL JUDGMENT

On this date, the Court issued an order granting Defendant State Automobile Mutual 

Insurance Company’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. As nothing remains to 

resolve, the court renders Final Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. 

IT IS ORDERED that the case is CLOSED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party bear its own costs. 

SIGNED on January 21, 2021. 

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00665-RP Document 32 Filed 01/21/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Storage Technology Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick
J. Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Patrick J. Martin

Patrick J. Martin
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002
Exhibit 99.9

























Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers


We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and reports evaluating OPTI Canada Inc.’s petroleum and natural gas reserves as of December 31, 2009, and the information derived from our reports, as described or incorporated by reference in OPTI Canada Inc.’s Annual Report on  Form 40-F for the year ended
December 31, 2009, filed with the United states Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended as applicable.
  Sincerely,
  McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd.
      graphicP. A. Welch, P. Eng.
President & Managing Director

Calgary, Alberta
March 15, 2010
SMR/MOATT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

DONALD J. TRUMP; U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY; ELAINE C. DUKE.

______________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

DONALD J. TRUMP; U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY; ELAINE C. DUKE, in her

official capacity as Acting Secretary of the

Department of Homeland Security

,

Petitioner s

,

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO

,

Respondent,

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA; JANET NAPOLITANO,

In her official capacity as President of the

University of California; STATE OF

CALIFORNIA; STATE OF MAINE;

STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF

MARYLAND; CITY OF SAN JOSE;

DULCE GARCIA; MIRIA M GONZALEZ

AVILA; VIRIDIANA CHABOLLA

MENDOZA; NORMA RAMIREZ;

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA; No. 17

- 72917

D.C. No s

. 3:17

- cv

- 05211

- WHA

3:17

- cv

- 05235

- WHA

3:17

- cv

- 05329

- WHA

3:17

- cv

- 05380

- WHA

3:17

- cv

- 05813

- WHA

Northern District of California,

San Francisco

ORDER 

# FILED

NOV 18 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL SSMR/MOATT 2

SERVICE EMPLOYEES

INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 521;

JIRAYUT LATTHIVONGSKORN;

SAUL JIMENEZ SUAREZ

,

Real Parties in Interest.

Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

The court has received the government’s November 17, 2017 emergency

stay motion . The response to the motion is due Monday, November 20, 2017

, at

12:00 p.m. PST, and the optional reply i s due Monday, November 20, 2017

, at

5:00 p.m. PST.

In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in the response and

reply, the parties shall address whether this court has jurisdiction to grant a stay of

proceedings, or whether the motion for a stay should instead be filed in the district

cour t. See Ellis v. U.S. Dist. Court , 360 F.3d 1022 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JERRY LEE ADAMS, a/k/a Clown,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-94-248)

Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Lee Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Lee Adams appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for resentencing. Our review of the record and the

district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United

States v. Adams, No. CR-94-248 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CONSENT OF MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.

The Board of Directors
Paramount Energy Operating Corp., as Administrator of 
 Paramount Energy Trust

We hereby consent to the reference to us in the Form 40-F of Paramount Energy Trust for the period ended December 31, 2005 and to the incorporation by reference therein of our reports dated March 4, 2005.

McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd.

signed by P. A. Welch

________________________________ P. A. Welch, P. Eng.
President & Managing Director

March 15, 2006 
 Calgary, Alberta







Suite 2200, Bow Valley Square 3, 255-5thAvenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta T2P 3G6
Tel: (403) 262-5506 Fax: (403) 233-2744 Email: mcdaniel@mcdan.com Website: www.mcdan.com

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  December  28,  1996 and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                Mar-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                   Mar-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                     Dec-28-1997
<CASH>                                            17,070,387
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     48,654,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                       1,829,815
<INVENTORY>                                       66,314,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 115,663,759
<PP&E>                                            15,791,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                     6,195,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   138,837,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             39,506,354
<BONDS>                                           41,343,009
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                           3,695,508
<OTHER-SE>                                        49,934,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     138,837,985
<SALES>                                          241,580,695
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 241,580,695
<CGS>                                            187,862,921
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    228,622,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   1,055,010
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,403,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   11,554,933
<INCOME-TAX>                                       4,592,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                6,962,933
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                       6,962,933
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .96
        


</TABLE>
#### BLACKMAN v. STATE.

No. 25385.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 3, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for violation of the liquor law and assessed a fine of $250, from which he appeals.

It is stipulated in the record that the complaint, as well as the information, originally filed charged appellant’s name as Willie Blackburn. The court permitted the county -attorney to ámehd both the complaint and information by changing the name of the accused and making it charge Willie Blackman.

When this was- done the complaint was vitiated. The instrument signed by the affiant, Roy E. Hillin, ceased to be a complaint. See Patillo v. State, 3 Tex.App. 442; Phariss v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 504, 126 S.W.2d 981; Hedspeth v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 627, 160 S.W.2d 928, hnd’the authorities discussed therein.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is dismissed.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 13

- 225 V

Filed: March 10, 2015

Not for P ublication

*************************************

PEGGY A. COFFEY, *

as Personal Representative of the Estate of *

WOODROW COFFEY, JR.

, *

*

Petitioner

, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision b ased on

* s tipulation of f act

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Lisa A. Roquemore

, Irvine, CA

, for petitioner.

Glenn A. MacLeod

, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On March 9 , 2015 , the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

Petitioner submitted a draft application for attorne ys’ f ees and costs to respondent

. During informal discussions, respondent ra ised objections t o certain items in petitioner’ s

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master’ s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special master s will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of priva cy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.application

. Based on these objections, petitioner amend s her application for attor ne ys’ fees and

costs to $ 38,507.93

. I n accordance with t he General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts that

she incurred $792.07 in costs to pursue her petition. Respondent does not object to these

amount s

. The undersigned fin ds these amount s to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court

awards :

a. $ 38,507.93 , representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award

shall be in the form of a chec k payable jointly to petitioner and Law Office of Lisa A.

Roquemore in the am ount of $ 38,507.93 ; and

b. $792.07 , representing reimbursement for petitioner’s costs. The award shall be in the

form of a check payable to petitioner in the amount of $792.07.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the cl erk of the

court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2015 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2
# Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent
Public Accounting Firm

---

# Exhibit 23

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.  333-121716  of  Tidelands
Bancshares,  Inc. on Form S-8,  pertaining to the Tidelands  Bancshares,  Inc.  2004 Stock  Incentive  Plan, of our
report,  dated March 19, 2007, that is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Tidelands  Bancshares,  Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ Elliott Davis, LLC

Elliott Davis, LLC
Columbia, South Carolina March 23, 2007