alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Atli . REGION 10

A 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101-3140

.t. -

MAY I 5 2015

Stu Clark

Air Quality Program Manager

Washington State Department of Ecology

P.O. Box 47600

Olympia, WA 98504-7600

Re: Completeness Determination for the "Interstate Transport of Lead. Nitrogen Dioxide. and

Ground-Level Ozone" SIP Submission

Dear Mr. Clark:

This letter is in response to your May 1 I, 201, 5 submission "Interstate Transport of Lead,

Nitrogen Dioxide, and Ground-Level Ozone." This submission is intended to demonstrate that

the State of Washington meets the Clean Air Act (CAA) section t I 0(a)(2)(D)(i) interstate

transport requirements for the 2008 lead (Pb), 2008 ozone, and 2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2)

national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) promulgated by the EPA. The EPA has

determined that the submission is complete for these NAAQS.

If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (206) 553-1271 or have your staff

contact Debra Suzuki, Air Planning Unit Manager. at (206) 553-0985 or Jeff Hunt, staff lead. at

206-553-0256.

OFFICE OF

AIR, WASTE AND TOXICS

ePrinted on Recycted Paper
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Dennis OBrien, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Silver Mines, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-a5(f)) for the Registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within this entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 12, 2010

By:    /s/ Dennis OBrien



Dennis OBrien, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          38,249
<SECURITIES>                                    11,813
<RECEIVABLES>                                  359,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,985
<INVENTORY>                                    267,477
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               681,093
<PP&E>                                       1,134,429
<DEPRECIATION>                                 658,037
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,615,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          382,149
<BONDS>                                        502,217
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        797
<COMMON>                                        11,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     620,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,615,714
<SALES>                                      1,356,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,356,473
<CGS>                                        1,082,976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,273,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (6,236)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,010
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,488
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,288
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,288
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.50
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Thomas S. Smith, President and a Director of Superior Silver Mines, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 14, 2009

By:    /s/ Thomas S. Smith

Thomas S. Smith, President and Director



---
EXH 10.18

                                      March 1, 1999


Mr. John J. Quicke
11 Stony Hollow Road
Chappaqua, NY 10514

Dear John:

     Reference is made to your Employment Agreement dated April 1,
1993, as amended by letter agreement dated March 1, 1995 and as
further amended by letter agreement dated September 26, 1996 (the
"Agreement").  This shall confirm that the term of the Agreement as
specified in Paragraph 6(a) thereof is hereby extended for an
additional three (3) year period commencing as of January 1, 2000
and expiring December 31, 2002.  The foregoing is expressly subject
to provisions of subparagraphs 6(b) and 6(c) of the Agreement.

     This shall also confirm that the first sentence of Paragraph
2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:

     "In full consideration of all of the services to be rendered
     by you under this Agreement, the Company will pay to you a
     base salary at the rate of Five Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars
     ($560,000) per year (that being the effective rate commencing
     March 1, 1999) during the term of your employment hereunder,
     payable in equal bi-weekly installments."

     Except as set forth above, this letter shall not amend or
affect your Agreement; said Agreement, as hereby amended, shall
remain in full force and effect.  If the above is in accordance
with your understanding, please sign the enclosed duplicate of this
letter and return it to the undersigned.  Upon our receipt of such
fully executed copy, this shall constitute a binding agreement
between us.

                                  SEQUA CORPORATION



                                  By:_________________________________
                                      Norman E. Alexander
                                      Chairman and Chief Executive 

Officer
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:



By:___________________________Date:___________
        John J. Quicke
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 3A


                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF
                       DAIMLERCHRYSLER MASTER OWNER TRUST

            THIS Certificate of Trust of DaimlerChrysler Master Owner Trust (the
"Trust") has been duly executed and is being filed by Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, a national banking association, as trustee, to create a
business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C., Section 3801
et seq.).

            1.    Name. The name of the business trust created hereby is
DaimlerChrysler Master Owner Trust.

            2.    Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee
of the Trust in the State of Delaware are Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National
Association, c/o JPMorgan Chase Bank, 500 Stanton Christiana Road, Fl. 3/OPS4,
Newark, Delaware 19713, Attention: Corporate Trust Department.

            3.    Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
on June 11, 2002.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, has executed this Certificate
of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Delaware Business Trust Act.

                                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                                            NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in
                                            its individual capacity
                                            but solely as Owner Trustee



                                            By:     /s/ Denis Kelly
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Name:  Denis Kelly
                                                 Title: Assistant Vice President
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 13



STOCK

The equity securities of VIB Corp consist of one class of common stock. At 
December 31, 1998 there were 8,158,209 shares outstanding, held by 
approximately 2,079 shareholders of record. VIB Corp's common stock traded 
over-the-counter prior to August 25, 1997 and was listed on the NASDAQ National 
Stock Market, trading under the symbol "VAIB" as of that date. It is currently 
traded under the symbol "VIBC". Although the VIB Corp is legally able to pay 
cash dividends, it is the Company's present policy to retain earnings to 
support growth.

The quarterly market trend price ranges for each of the last two years are 
shown in the following table. The market price of the Bank's common stock was 
$12.00 at December 31, 1998 compared to $14.70 at December 31, 1997. On 
December 31, 1996 the market price was $10.50. The following information is 
provided by Hoefer & Arnett, Inc. and Sutro & Company, Inc. for the period 
prior to August 25, 1997 and by NASDAQ thereafter.


                                 SALES PRICE(1)


QUARTER ENDED                         HIGH        LOW          SHARES TRADED
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 31, 1997                       $11.17      $ 9.83           203,418
June 30, 1997                         12.25       12.00           253,211
September 30, 1997                    15.20       13.00           173,984
December 31, 1997                     15.30       13.20           118,588(2)
March 31, 1998                        14.70       12.90           163,754
June 30, 1998                         14.40       12.40           423,379
September 30, 1998                    14.13       10.75           250,474
December 31, 1998                     13.63       11.00           230,552


(1) Does not include nominal amounts traded directly by shareholders or through
    other dealers. The figures have not been adjusted to reflect the 2% stock
    dividends effective December 26, 1997, the 3% stock dividend effective
    December 11, 1998 and has been adjusted for the six-for-five stock split
    effective May 9, 1997 and the five-for-four stock split effective June 12,
    1998.

(2) Does not include the 631,763 shares issued pursuant to the Bank's unit 
    offering.
#### Syracuse Supply Company, Appellant, v Seaboard Surety Company, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and cross motion granted. Memorandum: We reverse the judgment insofar as appealed from and grant plaintiff supplier’s cross motion for summary judgment on the cause of action asserted against the surety, Seaboard Surety Company (Seaboard). Liability on a payment bond required pursuant to State Finance Law § 137 was not intended to be contingent upon the existence of a lienable fund *(Chittenden Lbr. Co. v Silberblatt & Lasker,*288 NY 396, 404). "The 'benefits’ which the Legislature, by the enactment of section 137, intended to grant to laborers and materialmen, are found in the guarantee of payment afforded by the bond in those instances where there is no fund, or an insufficient fund, due the contractor or subcontractor on a State public improvement, against which the enforcement of valid and existing liens may lead to the payment thereof’ *(Chittenden Lbr. Co. v Silberblatt & Lasker, supra,*at 404). Section 137 supplements those provisions of the Lien Law and Labor Law which facilitate payment for labor and material furnished for a municipal public improvement. The statutory construction advanced by Seaboard must be rejected because it would provide to those who supply labor and materials on public contracts no greater assurance of payment than they had before the enactment of the statute. Under the circumstances of this case, "[t]he remedy on the payment bond is in the nature of a third-party beneficiary recovery. It is dependent neither on the existence of a lien fund or a Lien Law trust fund for its utilization or enforcement” *(Tri-City Elec. Co. v People,*96 AD2d 146, 150, *affd*63 NY2d 969). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hayes, J.—summary judgment.) Present—-Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
#### HOUSTON v. STATE.

No. 22418.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 3, 1943.

*185Rollie Fancher, of Seymour, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The unlawful possession of whisky and wine for the purpose of sale in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $100.

Peace officers had information that appellant had a load of whisky in his car. They found the car parked near where a dance was in progress, and could see a bottle of liquor lying on the front seat. The car was locked. They waited for a while, when appellant, accompanied by others, came to the car and took the bottle therefrom and drank of its contents. The officers then searched the car and found therein two full pints and a half pint of whisky and two pints of wine.

One of the parties present, who accompanied appellant to the dance, claimed the half pint of whisky, and testified, upon the trial of the case, that appellant was in no manner responsible therefor or connected with the possession thereof.

The appellant did not testify as a witness in his own behalf.

In submitting the case to the jury, the trial court made an application of the prima facie evidence rule, Art. 666-23a, § 2, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., to the effect that possession of more than one quart of liquor in a dry area constituted prima facie evidence of possession thereof for the purpose of sale.

Appellant contends that the charge was erroneous because the prima facie evidence rule applies only to the possession of more than a quart of both whisky and wine, and that the charge should have so instructed the jury. A proper and sufficient exception was reserved to the charge to raise the question.

If we understand appellant’s position correctly, it is that, so long as he did not have in his possession more than a quart of whisky, and more than a quart of wine, the prima facie evidence rule is not applicable.

It will be noted that the prima facie evidence statute applies to the possession of more than a quart of “liquor”. No designation as to its kind or character is made therein. The term “liquor”, as defined by Art. 666-3a, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., includes both whisky and wine.

It is the quantity of liquor possessed that controls the application of the prima facie evidence rule and that covers the possession of all liquors within the statutory definition of that term.

It follows that appellant’s position is untenable.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO

______________________________________ 

MELODY JOY CANTU AND DR. RODRIGO 

CANTU,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

DR. SANDRA GUERRA and DIGITAL 

FORENSICS CORPORATION, LLC,

 Defendants.

5:20-CV-0746 JKP – HJB

______________________________________

Proposed Order for Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion for an Ends of Justice Continuance 

of Trial

Upon due consideration of Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion for an Ends of Justice 

Continuance, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the current trial date in the above captioned 

matter of September 11, 2023, be moved to _______________.

It is so ORDERED.

Dated: _________________ _________________________________

HON. JUDGE JASON K. PULLIAM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 125-3 Filed 08/08/23 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code(18 U.S.C. §1350), Bernard A. Hausen, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of Cardica, Inc. (the“Company”), and Robert Y. Newell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his or her knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2006, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and**2.**The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.**InWitness Whereof**, the undersigned have set their hands hereto asof the 14th day of September,2006.     /s/ Bernard A. Hausen, M.D., Ph.D. Bernard A. Hausen, M.D., Ph.D.   /s/ Robert Y. Newell Robert Y. NewellChief Executive Officer   Chief Financial OfficerThis certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofCardica, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit
99.3








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of OPTI Canada Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher Slubicki,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




By:           /s/ Chris
Slubicki


Christopher Slubicki


President and Chief Executive
Officer




June
3, 2009
EXHIBIT W 

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-15 Filed 11/14/22 Page 1 of 11
GUERRA 000098

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-15 Filed 11/14/22 Page 2 of 11
GUERRA 000099

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-15 Filed 11/14/22 Page 3 of 11
GUERRA 000100

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-15 Filed 11/14/22 Page 4 of 11
GUERRA 000101

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-15 Filed 11/14/22 Page 5 of 11
GUERRA 000102

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-15 Filed 11/14/22 Page 6 of 11
GUERRA 000103

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-15 Filed 11/14/22 Page 7 of 11
GUERRA 000104

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-15 Filed 11/14/22 Page 8 of 11
GUERRA 000105

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-15 Filed 11/14/22 Page 9 of 11
GUERRA 000106

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-15 Filed 11/14/22 Page 10 of 11
GUERRA 000107

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-15 Filed 11/14/22 Page 11 of 11