alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

of

Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John G. Drosdick, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Sunoco, Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Sunoco, Inc.



|                     |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: August 2, 2006 |  | /s/ John G. Drosdick                           
|                     |  | John G. Drosdick                               
|                     |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 10.1


 


THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS


 


OF


 


CANNABICS PHARMACEUTICALS INC.


 


 


The following is a true copy
of the resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of this Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting having been
waived, held on this 3rd day of September, 2021;


 


The Board of Directors which was present for this
meeting & took active part therein was:


 


Eyal Barad


Gabriel Yariv


Gil Feiler


Dr. Inbar Maymon Pomeranchik


 


WHEREAS the Board of the Company
decided to create the position of Executive Chair,


 


NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED
that the majority of Directors having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who voice a preference in the issue
and pursuant to NRS 78.315, have unanimously decided and RESOLVED that:


 


GABRIEL YARIV shall retain his
position as Director, and Chief Operational Executive, as well as now being the Executive Chair of the Company.


 


Said Motion is hereby passed
and the corporate books, records and the Secretary shall file this Resolution in the corporate records


 


 


DATED: 3rd September, 2021


 


 


/s/ David E. Price                                      


David E. Price, Secretary, Corp Counsel
WEGO CHEMICAL & MINERAL CORP. 239 Great Neck Road • Great Necl{, NY 11021 LtsiL Lontrol Numoer Telephone: (516) 487-3510

Fax: (516) 487-3794 E-mail: sales@wegochem.com Website: www.wegochem.com 359316April3, 2014 Document Control Office (7407) Office of pollution Prevention and Toxics (MC 7405M) USEPA Headquarters, Ariel Rios Building**fJ,t,t.·~-** "'1-<? 1200 Pennsylivania Avenue, N.W. Washington DC20460 Lewis.paul@epa.gov ; Schaeffer.John@epa.gov Attn: TSCA Section 4

Re: 40 CFR part 790, subpart E- Test Rule Exemption Application Docket ID No.- EPA-HQ-OPPT -2009-0112

Wego Chemical & Mineral Corp.- CASRN 127-68-4 Dear Sirs:

,...., <:::::)..z:.-;!::oo-o::::0I-.l;:o..:I:Cf:'0 This letter serves as· an Application for Exemption in compliance with 40 CFR 790.80 and CFR 790.82. Test Rule Identification: 76 FR 65385 Chemical testing requirements for third group of high production volume chemicals (HPV3) Firm sponsoring test: Wego Chemical & Mineral Corp. Contact Person: 239 Great Neck Road, Great Neck, NY 11021 Cuthbert Frederick (Regulatory Manager) Great Neck, NY 11021 Ph # 516 487 3510 x122 Email: cfrederick@wcgochem.com Substance for Testing: Benzenesulfonic acid, 3-nitro-, sodium salt (1:1) CASRN 127-68-4 Testing Categories: Class 1 -Required tests A3, F2 Basis for Exemption: Tests required by test rule were completed and submitted by Tiarco Chemical. State of financial responsibility (40 CFR 790.99): Wego Chemical & Mineral Corp. understands that if this application is granted before the reimbursement period described in Section 4(C)(3)(B) ofTSCA expires, we will pay our fair and equitable share of the cost of complying with this requirement to submit the data and to Tiarco Chemical upon whose data the granting of the

application was based RECEIVED f. 00 1!:;**""'.~.**

EPA DOCKET CENTER

C.."");c:J -orr,-o ('""Ji-irn("') :::.::**CDr~~1**oCJ ·=z alO 1:10:::**~<(** E:::r:::a.en GIS ••**a!~**2(1)BcnO-WEGO CHEMICAL & MINERAL CORP. 239 Great Neck Road- Great Neck, NY 11021 Tel: (516) 487-3510 ext. 122 Fax: (516) 487-3794 E-mail: cfrederick@wegochem.com

1(Jel4/te: f(!(QQI.,**~·** e<JM
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


      I, Harold F. Zagunis, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Sequoia
Residential Funding, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of the
Certificates for periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
reports;

      4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the
terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed in the
reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement; and

      5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement, that is included
in these reports.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter Credit Corporation, as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.,
as Servicer, Cendant Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, Bank of America, N.A.,
as Servicer, GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, and Countrywide Home Loans,
Inc., as Servicer.


Date: March 31, 2005


/s/ Harold F. Zagunis
------------------------------------
Signature
Name: Harold F. Zagunis
Title: Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
##### 



Exhibit 99.4  (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPTERS LOGO)PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
350 S. Grand Ave.
Los Angeles CA 90071
Telephone (213) 236 3000
  Report of Independent Auditors  To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of GreenPoint Financial
Corporation:  We have examined managements assertion about GreenPoint Financial
Corporation and its subsidiaries, including GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.
(the Company) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of Americas Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers(USAP) as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2003 included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I).
Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
managements assertion about the Companys compliance based on our examination. Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the minimum
servicing standards. In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.  -s- PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP  March 25, 2004




---



##### 



Exhibit I  Managements Assertion Regarding Compliance
With Minimum Servicing Standards  As of and for the year ended
December 31, 2003, GreenPoint Mortgage
Funding, Inc. (the Company), a wholly-owned subsidiary of GreenPoint
Financial Corporation, has complied in all material respects with the minimum
servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of Americas
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period, GreenPoint Financial Corporation
maintained on behalf of the Company, errors and omissions and employee fidelity
bond insurance policies in the amount of $20,000,000 and $50,000,000,
respectively.  March 25, 2004 -s- Becky PoissonBecky Poisson
Executive Vice President of
Operations and Technology-s- Nathan HieterNathan Hieter
Controller-s- David PetriniDavid Petrini
Chief Financial Officer-s- S.A IbrahimS.A. Ibrahim
Chief Executive Officer
Mr. A. W. Carothers 

County Attorney 

Loving County 

Mentone, Texas 

Dear Mr. Carothers: 

February 27, 1939 

Opinion No. O-377 

Re: Whether or not It is legal.. 

to issue bonds to build road 

if petition ena oi+er for 

election state road runs 

through only two commissioners1 

precincts 

This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of February 15, 1939, which reads as follows: 

"Loving County is desirous of putting In a 

r&d from Mentone to the county line east, which 

road will run through commlssLonetisl precincts Nos. 

1 and 4 only, and does not Fun through commissioners1 

precincts Nos. 2 and 3 at all. 

"Would it be legal to vote bonds for the 

county to build this road If we desLgnate in the 

petition and order for the election that the'road 

for which the proceeds of the bonds are to be used 

runs through only two coimnlssioners' precincts?" 

It is our underatandlng from your letter that yoii are 

InterListed in the proper purpose clause to be used in your petition and order for election. The purpose clause should be worded as follows; 

'%or the purpose of the construction, maint'enance and operation of macadamlzed, graveled or 

paved roads-and turnpikes, or in aid thereof". 

Article 752a, R.C,S., Article .3, Section 52, Constitution of the State of Texas. 

-If you want to designate, in addition to he above 

purpose clause, in your petition and election order the exact 

route of the road and show that It will only mn through two 

cbmmlssioners 1 precincts, we know of no objections that we could 

mske'to your transcript for that reason. 
Mr. A.M. Carothers, February 27, 1939, Page #2 C-377 

Rowever,a statement of the road to be constructed, 

the route, and the amount to be expended for each tgpe of.cbtistructlon, Is unnecessary, undesirable and has no proper place 

in the petition, the selection order and other proceedings. The 

hoinmisslone~s’ CoUrt can cover all of these matters in a aeparate order to be passed at any time befotie the election. The 

&urtsYheve ruled that isn order of this natur'e constltiitei a 

valid and binding contract between the court and the taxpayers. 

Black vs. Strength, 246 S.W. 7~9. 

Trusting that this answers your question, we remain 

Very tntly sours 

ATT'ORNEY GENERAL ~W TEXAS 

By s/Clauae”o. Boothman 

Assistant 

COB:s:wc 

Approved: 

s/Gerald C. Mann 

ATTORNFX GENERAL OF TEXAS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2147

JOHN RYAN SCHLAMP, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND; ISMAEL CANALES, Detective 

#1891, Prince George's County Police Department, 

 Defendants – Appellees, 

 and 

GLENN F. IVEY, Prince George's County States Attorney's 

Office; FRANCIS LONGWELL, Prince George's County States 

Attorney's Office; ELAINE MOORE, Captain, Prince George's 

County Police Department; BUTLER, Corporal #1891, Prince 

George's County Police Department; MELVIN C. HIGH, Chief of 

Police, Prince George's County Police Department; STEPHEN C. 

ORENSTEIN, Legal Advisor, Prince George's County Police 

Department; RONALD SCHIFF, Judge, Prince George's County 

Courts; ROSS BOGASH, PFC, University of Maryland Police; 

MARY BROCK, Corp., University of Maryland Police Department, 

 Defendants. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. 

(1:06-cv-01644-DKC) 

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

John Ryan Schlamp, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Bock Karpinski, 

KARPINSKI, COLARESI & KARP, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

John Ryan Schlamp appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we deny Schlamp's motion for appointment of counsel 

and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Schlamp v. Prince George's County, Maryland, No. 1:06-cv-01644-

DKC (D. Md. Sept. 11, 2008).* We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

 *

 We decline to consider issues Schlamp raises for the first 

time on appeal.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration 

          - [Docket No. 94G-0267] 

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a petition (GRASP 4G0407) proposing to affirm that the use of a triglyceride containing behenic and oleic acids is generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a tempering aid and as an antibloom agent in chocolate and chocolate coatings. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Parvin M. Yasaei, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3023. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In a notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 17, 1994 (59 FR 42278), FDA announced that a petition (GRASP 4G0407) had been filed by Fuji Oil Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan. This petition proposed that the use of a triglyceride containing behenic and oleic acids as a tempering aid and as an antibloom agent in chocolate and chocolate coatings be affirmed as GRAS. Fuji Oil Co., Ltd., has now withdrawn the petition without                           ( print page 60969)                        prejudice to a future filing (21 CFR 171.7).                 

Dated: September 27, 2000. 

Alan M. Rulis, 

Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. 

[FR Doc. 00-26252 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated June 21, 2000, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on July 3, 2000 (65 FR 41093), ISP Freetown Chemicals, Inc., 2328 South Main Street, Assonet, Massachusetts 02702, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below: Drug
ScheduleAmphetamine (1100)
IIPhenylacetone (8501)
II
 The firm plans to bulk manufacture amphetamine for a customer and to bulk manufacture the phenylacetone for the manufacture of the amphetamine. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of ISP Freetown Chemicals, Inc. to manufacture the listed controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated ISP Freetown Chemicals, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. This investigation included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the a basic classes of controlled substances listed above is granted. Dated: October 4, 2000. John H. King, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 00-26369  Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06-14-00030-CV

Progressive Transportation, LLC

v.

Republic National Industries of Texas, LP, and Republic Corporation

(No. 2013-9369 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF HARRISON COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51 FEE

INDIGENT

CLERK'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD

$10.00

$100.00

$20.00

$50.00

$25.00

$516.00

$465.00

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

JADD F MASSO

STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP

STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP

STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP

STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP

STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP

SHACKELFORD, MELTON

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE 

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct 

copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, 

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, 

witness my hand and the Seal of 

the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Sixth District of Texas, this 

April 23, 2015.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___________________________

Deputy
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00630-CR

EX PARTE Juan Esteban VAZQUEZ-BAUTISTA

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CRB000723L1

Honorable Leticia Martinez, Judge Presiding1

BEFORE THE EN BANC COURT

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order denying habeas 

relief is REVERSED, and this cause is REMANDED TO THE TRIAL COURT WITH 

INSTRUCTIONS to discharge Juan Esteban Vazquez-Bautista from bail and dismiss the 

information in the underlying proceeding with prejudice.

SIGNED December 6, 2023.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

1

The Honorable Hugo D. Martinez is the judge of the Webb County Court at Law Number One. Associate Judge 

Leticia Martinez signed the order denying the habeas corpus relief at issue in this appeal.
#### HANCOCK v. STATE.

No. 22304.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 2, 1942.

Lawrence L. Barber, of Seagraves, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is theft. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for life.

It was, in substance, charged in the indictment that on or about the 9th day of February, 1941, W. A. Hancock, in Gaines County, Texas, did unlawfully and fraudulently take from the possession of R. R. Sims eleven horses, etc. It was further charged therein that on the 20th day of May, 1939,. he, the said W. A. Hancock, was duly and legally convicted in the District Court of Runnels County of a felony less than capital, to-wit, theft; and that on the ISth day of June, 1939, he was duly and legally convicted in the District Court of Tarrant County of a felony, to-wit,. swindling, etc.

There are no bills of exception in the re~-ord complaining of any error in the trial' of the case. The evidence introduced, as. reflected by the statement of facts, fully sustains the allegations in the indictment and the verdict of the jury.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-21129 Conference Calendar

LAWRENCE STEPHEN MAXWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CV-623

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lawrence Stephen Maxwell appeals from the district court’sdismissal of his petition to quash four administrative thirdparty summonses issued by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Maxwell argues that the district court erred by refusing to quash the summonses because the summonses were issued outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, Acts Of Congress are not applicable to the independent State of Texas, he was not subject to the administrative authority of the United StatesNo. 96-21129 -2- Federal Corporation, the summonses were issued in violation of the regulations promulgated under the Administrative Procedures Act, and the United States did not have the authority to prosecute him for activities investigated by the IRS. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.