alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex parte LEATHERWOOD.

No. 23185.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 28, 1945.

G. Q. Youngblood, of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Relator was arrested and confined by the Sheriff of Dallas County by virtue of an executive warrant issued by the Governor of this state in response to an extradition warrant from the Governor of the State of California, where she was charged by complaint in the Municipal Court of the City of Long Beach, State of California, with the offense of murder. After being taken into custody by the sheriff aforesaid, she applied to the Honorable Winter King, Judge of the Criminal District Court of Dallas County, Texas, for a writ of habeas corpus and prayed that upon a hearing thereof she be discharged from the custody of the sheriff. The writ was issued as prayed for. She then filed a motion in said court in which it was alleged that she was a female under the age of seventeen years and requested that she be tried as a juvenile or that her case be transferred to a court having jurisdiction of juveniles. The motion was overruled, and upon the hearing she was remanded to the Sheriff of Dallas County to be delivered by him to Les Johnson, Ethel Walling and Anna L. Shreve, the designated agents of the State of, California, to be removed to said state and there dealt with as provided by the laws of said state. She excepted to the ruling of the court and gave notice of appeal to this court for the desired relief.

The only question presented for review is whether her status as a criminal should be determined by the laws of this state or the laws of the demanding state. She contends that under the laws of this state she could not be guilty of a crime — an extraditable offense. Whether or not she could have been guilty of a crime in this state is not the question. She was charged in the demanding state with the offense of murder for which she could be extradited under Art. *997,*C.C.P., State of Texas, and Section 2 of Article 4 of the Federal Constitution and the laws enacted by Congress in pursuance thereof. Consequently she is subject to be extradited. She wants the courts of this state to determine her status as to whether or not she is a juvenile under the laws of this state and whether or not she is guilty of a crime. This we are not willing to do because that is a matter for the courts of the demanding state to determine.

Believing that the case was properly disposed of, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 99.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

      I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, Motorola Debenture-Backed Series 2002-14 Trust (the "Trust"),
certify that:

    1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
        Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing
        reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in respect of
        periods included in the year covered by this annual report of the
        Trust;

    2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
        whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
        omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
        in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
        not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
        report;

    3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
        provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
        under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in
        such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

    4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee
        under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my
        knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has
        fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.



Date: March 28, 2005


         /s/ David J. Kolibachuk
----------------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
EXHIBIT 10

Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 3 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 4 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 5 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 6 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 7 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 8 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 9 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 10 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 11 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 12 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 13 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 14 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 15 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 16 of 17
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-17 Filed 03/05/21 Page 17 of 17
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-34-000]


Overthrust Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

October 12, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 10, 2000, Overthrust Pipeline Company 
(Overthrust) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1-A, First Revised Sheet No. 67D, First Revised 
Sheet No. 67E, Original Sheet No. 67F and Original Sheet No. 67G, to be 
effective November, 1, 2000.
    Overthrust states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
Order No. 587-L issued June 30, 2000, in Docket No. RM96-1-014, which 
established November 1, 2000, as the implementation date for interstate 
pipeline companies to include, in their FERC Gas Tariff, a provision to 
permit shippers to net and trade imbalances.
    Overthrust states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
its customers, the Public Service Commission of Utah and the Public 
Service Commission of Wyoming.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26690 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Physics (1208).                    

*Date and Time:*                         November 1-3, 2000 at 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 1020, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. John Lightbody, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-4628.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning pre-proposals submitted in response to the Physics Centers proposal solicitation (NSF 00-108).                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate pre-proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The pre-proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; information on personnel and proprietary date for present and future subcontracts. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: October 10, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-26321  Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 5.2  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the annual report of Canadian Superior Energy Inc.
(the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert A. Pilling, Vice President and Secretary,  the principal financial officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.  Dated:  May 20,  2003  /s/  Robert
  A. PillingName: Robert PillingTitle:  Vice President and
  Secretary  A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Canadian
Superior Energy Inc. (the Company) and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Gramercy Park Dental Services, P. C., Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Yesawich, Jr., J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 28, 1989, which assessed Gramercy Park Dental Services, P. C. for additional unemployment insurance contributions.

On March 27, 1986, the Commissioner of Labor issued Gramercy Park Dental Services, P. C., which provides space, equipment and support services for dentists, a "Notice of Determination of Contributions Due” under Labor Law § 571. After a formal hearing, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) found the dentists to be independent contractors and overturned the Commissioner’s determination. That decision was mailed and duly filed on March 13, 1987. Some 14 months later, on June 29, 1988, Gramercy received notice of the Commissioner’s appeal. Despite Gramercy’s request to have the appeal denied as untimely, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board rescinded the decision and remanded the matter for a hearing de novo because the tape recording of the hearing held 14 months earlier had been misplaced.

A second hearing was conducted before another ALJ. The dentists were again found to be independent contractors and the Commissioner’s determination was again overruled. The *786Commissioner timely and successfully appealed this latter determination; the Board imposed liability upon Gramercy. However, neither the second ALJ nor the Board addressed Gramercy’s timeliness objection. Gramercy has appealed.

Labor Law § 621 (2) provides: "Within twenty days after the mailing or personal delivery of notice of the decision after a hearing on contested determinations, rules or orders by the commissioner * * * the commissioner may * * * within such period take an appeal to the board by giving written notice thereof to the employer”. It is undisputed that Gramercy never received notice of the Commissioner’s first appeal until well after the statutory period had expired *(cf., Matter of Lebron [Ross],*72 AD2d 886). This is an incurable infirmity. The copy of the Commissioner’s notice of appeal, bearing a filing date of March 13, 1987, which was apparently served on the ALJ "section” on March 31, 1987, does not remedy the situation for it confirms that a copy of the notice of appeal was not sent to Gramercy, as the alleged employer. Even assuming that document was part of the record, an assumption vigorously disputed by Gramercy, the fact remains that the Commissioner has not demonstrated that he timely provided a written notice of appeal to Gramercy as statutorily required *(see, Matter of Chapman [Roberts]*138 AD2d 866, 867). Inasmuch as the Board had no jurisdiction to rescind the first ALJ’s decision *(cf., Matter of Askew [Levine],*50 AD2d 647), the Board’s decision and the second ALJ’s decision must be vacated and the ALJ’s decision of March 13, 1987 reinstated.

Decision vacated, without costs, and decision of the Administrative Law Judge dated March 13, 1987 reinstated. Kane, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 10.3(e)**

**STOCKERYALE, INC.**

**AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE2000 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN**

             This AMENDMENT NO. 1 dated as ofMarch 19, 2001 (this “Amendment”) to the StockerYale, Inc. 2000 Stock Optionand Incentive Plan, as approved by the Board of Directors of StockerYale, Inc.(the “Company”) as of March 19, 2001 (the “Plan”), is adopted by the Board ofDirectors, subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company, on thedate hereof.  All capitalized terms usedand not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in thePlan.

             Pursuant to Section 15 of the Plan,the Board of Directors hereby amends the first sentence of Section 3(a) of thePlan by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
|   | (a) | Stock  Issuable.  The maximum number of  shares of Stock reserved and available for issuance under the Plan shall be  2,800,000 shares of Stock, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3(b);  provided that not more than 200,000 shares shall be issued in the form of  Unrestricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Awards, or Performance Share  Awards except to the extent such Awards are granted in lieu of cash  compensation or fees. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

             Except as so amended, the Plan inall other respects is confirmed and ratified and shall remain and continue infull force and effect.

Adopted by the Board of Directors: March 19, 2001

Approved by theStockholders:  May 24, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q DATED SEPTEMBER 29, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<CIK> 0000094673
<NAME> STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000


<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-29-2000
<CASH>                            221,613
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     464,119 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       229,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,038,605
<PP&E>                            262,297 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,518,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             604,833
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           10,175
<OTHER-SE>                        891,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,518,261
<SALES>                           975,308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,458,763
<CGS>                             578,502
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     887,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  588,974
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 13,617
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (50,217)
<INCOME-TAX>                      (17,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (32,617)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (32,617)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.32)

<FN>
<F1> Asset values for the interim period represent net amounts.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF


INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to the use of our reports, dated March 29, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Canadian Superior Energy Inc. (which audit report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes a separate report titled Comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants on Canada-United States of America Reporting Difference relating to changes in accounting principles) and the effectiveness of Canadian Superior Energy Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Canadian Superior Energy Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.




/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP




Independent Registered Chartered Accountants




Calgary, Canada


March 29, 2010
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q DATED
MARCH 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<CIK> 0000094673
<NAME> STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              QUARTER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-28-1997
<CASH>                                       521,651
<SECURITIES>                                  16,962
<RECEIVABLES>                                420,979 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  289,339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,248,931
<PP&E>                                       328,138 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,867,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        484,195
<BONDS>                                       21,692
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      12,400
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,326,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,867,122
<SALES>                                      297,670
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             438,595
<CGS>                                        165,405
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                241,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              45,699
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               54,289
<INCOME-TAX>                                  14,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           39,589
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  39,589
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.32

<FN>
   <F1> Asset values for the interim period represent
        net amounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>