alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elizabeth Arden, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Scott Beattie, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Stephen J. Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(i)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Date:  February 9, 2009 |  | /s/ E. Scott Beattie                                                 
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |                                                                      
|                        |  | E. Scott Beattie
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer     
|                        |  |                                                                      
|                        |  |                                                                      
|Date:  February 9, 2009 |  | /s/ Stephen J. Smith                                                 
|                        |  |                                                                      
|                        |  | Stephen J. Smith
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  |                                                                      





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul K. Kaufmann, SeniorVice President and Corporate Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Paul K. Kaufmann |   |
|----------------------|--------|

Paul K. KaufmannSenior Vice President and Corporate ControllerMay 5, 2010

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc.and will be retained by Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Delaware 2008 Base Year Emissions Inventory Supporting Files

Delaware submitted approximately 55 emissions inventory files, whose cumulative size is over 

50 MB. Many of these files are multi-spreadsheet EXCEL files or model input and output files 

that are not easily converted to the pdf format for uploading to www.regulations.gov. Because of 

the large number of files and the format of these file, they are not available for download from 

www.regulations.gov. Copies of these files are available for public inspection at the EPA 

Region III address listed in the Federal Register Proposed Rule document. For further 

information, EPA Region III's point of contact (POC) is listed in this docket.

Folder Structure & File Names for Delaware’s 2011 Ozone Base Year Emissions Inventory 

Files in Delaware’s “2011 BY Inv” CD

2011 BY Inv for 08 O3 NAAQS

Nonpoint

Ag Burning 2011 9-16-13 Final.xlsx

Ag Pesticides 2011 3-28-14 Final.xlsx

AIM Coatings 2011 Final 11-26-13.xlsx

Asphalt Paving 2011 11-26-13.Final.xlsx

Auto Refinishing 2011 11-27-13 Final.xlsx

CMV Pet Evap 3-25-2014 final.xlsx

Commercial & Consumer Products 2011 12-2-13 Final.xlsx

Commercial Cooking 2011 - Final 12-11-13.xlsx

Commercial Fuel Combustion 2011 final 3-27-14.xlsx

Dry Cleaners 2011 Final 3-6-14.xlsx

Gasoline Marketing 2011 Final 3-28-14.xlsx

Graphic Arts 2011 - Final 12-17-13.xlsx

Industrial Adhesives 2011 12-27-13 final.xlsx

Industrial Fuel Combustion 2011 final 3-28-14.xlsx

Industrial Surface Coatings 2011 Final 8-6-13.xlsx

Land Cleaning Debris Open Burning 2011 Final 12-27-13.xlsx

Prescribed Burning 2011 1-15-14 Final.xlsx

Residential Fuel Combustion 2011 final 3-26-14.xlsx

Residential Open Burning 2011 Final 2-27-13.xlsx

Residential Wood Combustion 2011 3-31-14 Final.xlsx

Solvent Cleaning 2011 Final 8-6-13.xlsx

Structure Fires 2011 1-16-14 Final.xlsx

Traffic Markings 2011 Final 2-19-14.xlsx

Vehicle Fires 2011 2-19-14 Final.xlsx

Wild Fires 2011 2-20-14 Final.xlsx

Offroad

NONROAD Input

NCCAU11.opt

NCCSD11.opt

NCCSP11.opt

NCCSU11.opt

NCCWN11.opt
SXAU11.opt

SXSD11.opt

SXSP11.opt

SXSU11.opt

SXWN11.opt

NONROAD Output

NCCAU11.OUT

NCCSD11.OUT

NCCSP11.OUT

NCCSU11.OUT

NCCWN11.OUT

NONROAD BY2011 for Ozone.xlsx

SXAU11.OUT

SXSD11.OUT 

SXSP11.OUT

SXSU11.OUT

SXWN11.OUT

Aircraft 2011 FINAL 5-13-14 for Ozone BY.xlsx

Dredging 3-25-2014 2011 final.xlsx

Ferries 5-23-2013 2011 final.xlsx

Locomotives 2011 5-14-14 FINAL for Ozone BY.xlsx

OGV Exhaust 4-22-2013 final 2011.xlsx

Tows and Tugs 5-23-2013 final 2011.xlsx

Onroad

NCC 2011 MOVES Inputs - FINAL.xlsx

Sussex 2011 MOVES Inputs - FINAL.xlsx

Point

2011 - Point - NC & Sussex - CO NOX VOC.xlsx
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DANIEL GERARD LACEY,

Petitioner,

v.

OP 20-0142

THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT,

HON. GREGORY R. TODD,

District Court Judge,

Respondent.

MAR 2 It 2020

Bowen G

t

reenwood

Eeme Court

°ttaille o ontana

(..irttGINAL

Daniel Gerard Lacey petitions this Court for a writ of supervisory control over the

Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, and the Honorable Gregory R.

Todd. Lacey seeks relief here because the District court issued an Order denying his writ

of habeas corpus on December 23, 2019, and stated that "Lacey's remedy under a Writ of

Habeas Corpus is not available to him . . . " because "[h]e does not get another bite of the

Habeas apple." Lacey contends that his "Fundamental Constitutional Rights" have been

violated because of this procedural bar. Lacey puts forth that supervisory control is

necessary because he cannot appeal a denial of a habeas corpus petition.

Supervisory control is an extraordinary remedy. "Supervisory control is appropriate

`when urgency or emergency factors exist making the normal appeal process inadequate,

when the case involves purely legal questions, and when one or more of three enumerated

circumstances exist. M. R. App. P. 14(3)." City ofBillings ex rel. Huertas v. Billings Mun.

Court, 2017 MT 261, ¶ 2, 389 Mont. 158, 404 P.3d 709.

We do not find the existence of urgency or emergency factors, and we conclude that

supervisory control is not warranted because the District Court is not proceeding upon a

mistake of law causing a gross injustice. M. R. App. P. 14(3). Lacey's fundamental

constitutional rights have not been violated nor is the writ of habeas corpus suspended.

03/24/2020

Case Number: OP 20-0142
A district court's denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus in a criminal

proceeding is not appealable to this Court. Morrison v. Mahoney, 2002 MT

21, ¶ 8, 308 Mont. 196, 41 P.3d 320 (citing Coble v. Magone, 229 Mont. 45,

46, 744 P.2d 1244, 1245 (1987), in turn citing In re Hart, 178 Mont. 235,

583 P.2d 411 (1978)). This is so because a writ of habeas corpus may be

granted by either a district court or this Court and, as a result, the denial of

such a writ by a district court is not res judicata because it does not divest us

of jurisdiction to grant a subsequent petition. Morrison, ¶ 8 (citing Hart, 178

Mont. at 241, 583 P.2d at 414, and § 46-22-202(1), MCA).

Thomas v. Doe, 2011 MT 283, ¶ 3, 362 Mont. 454, 266 P.3d 1255. While Lacey may not

be able to appeal the court's decision, he is not precluded frorn seeking habeas corpus relief

with this Court. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Lacey's Petition for a Writ of Supervisory Control is

DENIED and DISMISSED.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to the Honorable Gregory R.

Todd, Thirteenth Judicial District Court; to Terry Halpin, Clerk of District Court,

Yellowstone County, under Cause No. DV- 19-1645; to counsel of record; and to Daniel

Gerard Lacey personall .

DATED this *Z-Lt day of March, 2020.

Chief Justice

Justices
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26680]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-355-003]


Baltimore Gas and Electric Company; Notice for Extension of 
Waiver and Request for Expedited Consideration

October 12, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 3, 2000, Baltimore Gas and Electric 
(BGE) tendered for filing a request to extend BGE's current ``shipper 
must have title'' policy waiver and a request for expedited 
consideration.
    BGE requests an effective date of November 1, 2000, for the 
extended waiver.
    BGE states that copies of the filing have been served on Columbia 
Gas Transmission Corporation and Dominion Transmission, Inc. (formerly 
CNG Transmission Corporation).
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before October 19, 2000. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be 
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-
208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26680 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06008**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 06008\06008_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06008\06008_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06008\06008_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06008\06008_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06008\06008_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06008\06008_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06008\Certification Statement Plant ID 06008.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 06008\Supplemental Documents\06008_Plant Diagrams.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 06008\06008_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 27, 2019

NO. 03

- 18

- 00744

- CV

Catherine Powell, Appellant

v.

Jose Rocha III d/b/a Rocha III Contractors, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF CALDWELL COUNT Y

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KER, AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on October 2, 2018

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. A ppellant shall pay al l

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
#### Thomas GUERRERO, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 22570.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 19, 1943.

J. A. Collier, of Houston, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder with malice aforethought, and his punishment assessed at twenty years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

We find incorporated in the transcript appellant’s application, duly verified, asking that the appeal be withdrawn, which request is granted and the appeal ordered dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 4027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1671]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

DOE/NSF High Energy Physics Advisory Panel

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Science.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the DOE/NSF High Energy 
Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP). The Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these 
meetings be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Monday, March 12, 2012; 10 a.m.-6 p.m. and Tuesday, March 13, 
2012; 9 a.m.-1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hotel Palomar, 2121 P Street NW., Washington, DC 20037.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Kogut, Executive Secretary; High 
Energy Physics Advisory Panel; U.S. Department of Energy; SC-25/
Germantown Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20585-1290; Telephone: (301) 903-1298.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of Panel: To provide advice and guidance to the Department 
of Energy and the National Science Foundation on scientific priorities 
within the field of high energy physics research.
    Tentative Agenda: Agenda will include discussions of the following:

Monday, March 12, 2012 and Tuesday, March 13, 2012

     Discussion of Department of Energy High Energy Physics 
Program
     Discussion of National Science Foundation Elementary 
Particle Physics Program
     Reports on and Discussions of Topics of General Interest 
in High Energy Physics
     Public Comment (10-minute rule)
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do 
so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any of these items on the agenda, you should 
contact John Kogut by phone at: (301) 903-1298 or by email at: 
John.Kogut@science.doe.gov. You must make your request for an oral 
statement at least 5 business days before the meeting. Reasonable 
provision will be made to include the scheduled oral statements on the 
agenda. The Chairperson of the Panel will conduct the meeting to 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Public comment will follow 
the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available on the High 
Energy Physics Advisory Panel Web site at: http://science.energy.gov/hep/hepap.

    Issued at Washington, DC on January 20, 2012.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-1671 Filed 1-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-50403

JAMES FULTON, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:13-CV-47

Before SMITH, WIENER, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

James Fulton, Jr., Texas prisoner # 1770265, has filed a notice of appeal 

that is untimely with respect to the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application 

challenging his conviction for murder. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A). It also is 

untimely with respect to the denial of his motion seeking to reopen the time 

for appeal. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (c)(1). Alternatively, his request to 

the district court to reopen the time for appeal was untimely, so his appeal of 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 13, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-50403 Document: 00514383848 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2018
No. 17-50403

2

that denial is without merit. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. See 

Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chicago, 138 S. Ct. 13, 16-17 (2017); 

28 U.S.C. § 2107(a), (c). The motions for a certificate of appealability and leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED.

 Case: 17-50403 Document: 00514383848 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/13/2018
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Upstream
Biosciences Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that:

| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
      period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                     

|Dated: December 19, 2008 | By: /s/ Tim Fernback                      
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------
|                         | Tim Fernback                              
|                         | Chief Financial Officer                   
|                         | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
|                         | Accounting Officer)                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Upstream
Biosciences Inc. and will be retained by Upstream Biosciences Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Robert Marsh, Respondent, v David Phillips et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in *Marsh v Phillips*([appeal No. 1] 167 AD2d 905 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Cite as 2015 Ark. 385



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Opinion Delivered October 22, 2015

IN RE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT COMMI SSION ON CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND FAMILIES

PER CURIAM Representative David Meeks, Dr. Karen Farst, and Mary Claire Hyatt are appointedto the Arkansas Supreme Court Commission on Children, Youth, and Families for threeyear terms to expire on December 31, 2018. We reappoint Judge Wiley Branton, Jr., Judge Ken Coker, Jr., Dr. Sherece West, and Ms. Claire Babineaux-Fontenot for th ree-year terms to expire on December 31, 2018. We recognize Johnny Key, Commissioner of Education, as a standing member of the commission. We thank all of them for their willingness to serve on this important committee. We designate Justice Rhonda K. Wood to succeed Retired

Chief Ju stice Jim Hannah as chair. The court expresses its gratitude to outgoing members: Retired Chief Justice Jim Hannah, Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Dr. Tony Woods, John Selig, Senator Missy Irvin, Representative Stephanie Malone, Dr. Jonathan Bates, and Ms. Sedella White for their years

of valuable service to this commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This section contains summary financial information extracted from the Standard
Register Company financial statements for the three months ended April 2, 2000,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                          62,021
<SECURITIES>                                       380
<RECEIVABLES>                                  244,294
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,847
<INVENTORY>                                    140,972
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               465,835
<PP&E>                                         510,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                 172,219
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 964,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,586
<BONDS>                                        203,520
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,208
<OTHER-SE>                                     510,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   964,722
<SALES>                                        313,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               314,241
<CGS>                                          194,083
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  297,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   973
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,211)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,296)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,915)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,915)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>