alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5733 

To suspend temporarily the duty on instant print film for analog photography. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. MALONEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on instant print film for 

analog photography. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INSTANT PRINT FILM FOR ANALOG PHOTOG4 RAPHY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Instant print film of a kind 

used for analog photography 

in mirrored reflex cameras 

for frontal exposure on a negative base (provided for in 

subheading 3701.20.0030) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5733 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
---

Exhibit 8.1



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



The following companies are subsidiaries of Nevada Geothermal Power Inc. as of January 5, 2009:



|                                        |                               |          
|--------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | ---------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                      | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION | OWNERSHIP
|Blue Mountain Power Company             | British Columbia, Canada      | 100%     
|Nevada Geothermal Operating Company LLC | Delaware                      | 100%     
|Nevada Geothermal Power Company         | Nevada                        | 100%     
|Desert Valley Gold Co.                  | Nevada                        | 100%     
|NGP Blue Mountain Holdco LLC            | Delaware                      | 100%     
|NGP Blue Mountain Holdco II LLC         | Delaware                      | 100%     
|NGP Blue Mountain Holdco III LLC        | Delaware                      | 100%     
|NGP Blue Mountain Holdco IV LLC         | Delaware                      | 100%     
|NGP Blue Mountain I LLC                 | Delaware                      | 100%     
|NGP Blue Mountain II LLC                | Delaware                      | 100%     
|NGP Blue Mountain III LLC               | Delaware                      | 100%     
|NGP Blue Mountain IV LLC                | Delaware                      | 100%     

For details see Item 4-C Information on the Company







---
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Stephan Co. (the "Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Frank F. Ferola, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



/s/ Frank F. Ferola
__________________________________
Frank F. Ferola
Chief Executive Officer
November 22, 2004



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Farash Construction Corporation, Appellant, v Perticone Electric, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Doyle, J. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Doyle, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TIMOTHY LEE JACOBS JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 6 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1
   Certification of CEO and CFO
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of Sonde Resources Corp. (the "Registrant") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jack W. Schanck, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant and Kurt Nelson, as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 /s/ Jack W. SchanckName:
Jack W. SchanckTitle:
President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
March 25, 2011/s/ Kurt NelsonName:
Kurt NelsonTitle:
Interim Chief Financial OfficerDate:
March 25, 2011
 
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 3.1
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
CAVIUM NETWORKS, INC.
  Cavium Networks, Inc. Corporation
 First:
 Second :
 Third:
 I.
  II.
  III.
  IV.
 A.
 B.
 1




---



##### 



.
 C. provided, however
 V.
  A.
 1. Management of Business
  2. Board of Directors
 a.
 2




---



##### 



b.
 c.
  3. Removal of Directors
 a.
 3




---



##### 



b.
 4. Vacancies
 a.
 b.
 (i)
 (ii)
 B.
 1. Bylaw Amendments
 .
 4




---



##### 



2. Ballots
  3. Action by Stockholders
  4. Advance Notice
  VI.
 A.
 B.
 C.
 VII.
 A.
 B.
  5




---



##### 



Four :
 Five :
 6




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof , th
 /s/ Syed AliSyed AliPresident and Chief Executive Officer 7
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1667

LAN LIN ZAORSKI , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:18

- cv - 00234

- D )

Submitted : September 24, 2019 Decided: September 26, 2019

Before WYNN and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Lan Lin Zaorski, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Bryan Royster, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinio ns are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lan Lin Zaorski appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her
civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s
conclusion that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the suit, as Zaorski failed to establish standing to raise her claims. ∗ See Spokeo , Inc. v. Robins , 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1547

- 48 (2016) ( describing injury

- in

- fact requirement ); Lujan v. Defs

. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 55 5,
560

- 61 (1992) ( discussing elements of standing ); see also Myers v. Loudoun C t y . Pub

. Sch

. , 418 F.3d 395, 400 (4th Cir. 2005) (“The right to litigate for oneself . . . does not create a coordinate right to litigate for others .”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

∗ Insofar as Zaorski alle ges that the district court was biased in favor of the Government in resolving her suit, we find her allegations wholly unsupported by the record. See Liteky v. United States , 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994) (“[J]udicial rulings alone almost never constitute a v alid basis for a bias or partiality motion.”).
#### WILSON v. STATE.

No. 25964.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1952.

Bill Snow, Big Lake, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is swindling; the punishment, five years.

Our able State’s Attorney has confessed error herein.

Appellant was indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced on the same day. He plead guilty before the court without the intervention of a jury and without the benefit of counsel.

The learned trial court apparently did not familiarize himself with the terms of Article 10a, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., which provides in part as follows: “Provided, that before a defendant who has no At*198torney can agree to waive a Jury, the Court *must*appoint an Attorney to represent him.”

In Hernandez v. State, 138 Tex. Cr.R. 4, 133 S.W.2d 584, in discussing the above-quoted portion of the act, we said:

> “This provision of the statute seems to be mandatory, and before a person charged with a felony can waive this valuable right of a trial by jury, provided he has no attorney representing him, we hold it is the duty of the trial court to appoint one for him. Such an appointment should have been made by the trial court.”

The trial court should have granted appellant’s motion for new trial.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 I, James M.
Papada, III, Chief Executive Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
the
  quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 28, 2008 (the
  Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and(2)
information
  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the financial condition and results of operations of Technitrol, Inc.  Dated: May 5, 2008
/s/ James M.
  Papada, IIIJames M.
  Papada, III A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be
retained by Technitrol, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies
the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-31-000]

Take notice that on October 6, 2000, USG Pipeline Company (USGPC) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 51, with an effective date of November 1, 2000.

USGPC states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the Commission's Order No. 587-L issued June 30, 2000 in Docket No. RM96-1-014. USGPC requests waiver of the Commission's regulations to permit the tariff sheet to become effective November 1, 2000.

USGPC states that copies of this filing are being provided to its sole customer and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26687 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC,

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD, and 6:20-cv-00507-ADA

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Neonode Smartphone LLC

4/27/23

SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.

1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 654-6666

Bryce T. Barcelo (24092081)

bbarcelo@susmangodfrey.com

(713) 651-9366

/s/ Bryce T. Barcelo

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 76 Filed 04/28/23 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000095366
<NAME> SUNAIR ELECTRONICS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,544,584
<SECURITIES>                                 3,153,256
<RECEIVABLES>                                  475,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                  7,264,394
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,353,228
<PP&E>                                       4,111,922
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,157,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,460,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          240,404
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       393,237
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,991,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,460,855
<SALES>                                      1,148,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,212,613
<CGS>                                          827,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  827,296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               287,480
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 97,837
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

of

Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Thomas W. Hofmann, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sunoco, Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sunoco, Inc.



|                     |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 2, 2006 |  | /s/ Thomas W. Hofmann                            
|                     |  | Thomas W. Hofmann                                
|                     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26306]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-130-2810-HT; GP1-0004]


Fire Closure Regulated and Public Lands Restrictions Lifted: 
Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District.

NOTICE: Notice of Regulated Fire Closure and Restrictions For Bureau of 
Land Management Public Lands in the State of Washington are Lifted.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 43 CFR 9212 and the Federal Register Notice dated 
July 28, 2000 (FR-0307), fire restrictions are lifted on public lands 
within the Spokane District, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) including 
Juniper Forest/Juniper Dunes Recreation Area, and areas surrounding Hog 
Canyon, Miller Ranch/Fishtrap, Pacific Lake, Twin Lakes, Coffeepot, 
Yakima River Canyon, Douglas Creek, Chopaka/Palmer Mountain, Split 
Rock, Liberty, Saddle Mountains, Lakeview Ranch/Lake Creek, Boundary 
Dam, and Escure Ranch/Rock Creek recreation sites.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Boyd, Fire Management Officer, 
Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District Officer, 1103 N. Fancher 
Road, Spokane Washington, 99212; or call (509) 536-1200.

    Dated: October 6, 2000.
Joseph K. Buesing,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-26306 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The notes to the condensed  consolidated  financial  statements  are an integral
part of such statements and the condensed  consolidated financial information in
this schedule. Figures below are in thousands, except per-share data.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-27-1998
<CASH>                                           3,342
<SECURITIES>                                     6,450
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,198
<INVENTORY>                                    120,087
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               261,135
<PP&E>                                          89,341
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 337,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,781
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,237
<OTHER-SE>                                     229,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   337,083
<SALES>                                        128,985
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,985
<CGS>                                           82,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   496
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,943
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,542
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,401
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,401
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00084-CR

Julian BAZAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR1157

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 16, 2022

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

The trial court imposed sentence on October 17, 2019. Because appellant did not file a 

motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on November 18, 2019. TEX. R. APP.

P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on December 2, 

2019. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until February 9, 2022. 

“A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.” Taylor v. 

State, 424 S.W.3d 39, 43 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). “A defendant’s notice of appeal is timely if 

filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended, or within ninety days after 
04-22-00084-CR

- 2 -

sentencing if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial.” Id. (citing TEX. R. APP. P.

26.2(a)(1)). Because appellant did not timely file a notice of appeal, it appeared we lacked

jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, on February 28, 2022, we ordered appellant to show cause 

why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

On March 3, 2022, appellant’s appointed appellate counsel filed a response stating he could 

not show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Therefore, we 

dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish