alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page | 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00571-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00572-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00573-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00574-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00575-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00576-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00577-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00578-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00579-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00580-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00581-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00582-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00583-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00584-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00585-ADA

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE REGARDING 

DISCLOSURE OF EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s Version 3.2 of the Court’s Order Governing proceedings entered 

November 9, 2020, and in accordance with the Court’s Scheduling Order, Plaintiff hereby notifies 

the Court Plaintiff has disclosed the extrinsic evidence it intends to rely upon concerning claim 

construction on Defendant Google LLC via electronic mail on January 13, 2021.

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 36 Filed 01/14/21 Page 1 of 2
Page | 2

DATED: January 14, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Mark D. Siegmund_____ 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered 

electronically via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, 

on this the 14th day of January 2021.

/s/ Mark D. Siegmund

Mark D. Siegmund

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 36 Filed 01/14/21 Page 2 of 2
#### Sam Scott, Doing Business as Aluminum and Stainless Steel Products, Respondent, *v.*Robert M. Erdman et al., Defendants, and Carol M. Erdman, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

December 13, 1957.

*Melvin Sacks*and *Irving Koufax*for appellant.

*Francis S. Furey*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The promise to complete the draperies to the entire satisfaction of the defendant does not impute merely a reasonable satisfaction. The determination of the question as to whether the services of the plaintiff under the contract were satisfactory, belonged entirely to the defendant subject to no control from the courts *(Ginsberg*v. *Friedman,*146 App. Div. 779, revg. 125 N. Y. S. 473; *Diamond*v. *Mendelsohn,*156 App. Div. 636). The personal satisfaction of the purchaser in this case was a compelling factor in the placing of the order with plaintiff and plaintiff agreed to complete the draperies to the satisfaction of the defendant. Plaintiff’s agreement to perform involved taste, fancy and personal satisfaction and he was duty bound to comply with the terms of his contract *(Crawford*v. *Mail & Express Pub. Co.,*163 N. Y. 404).

The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, judgment granted to the appellant on her counterclaim in the sum of $200, with interest, together with $30 costs

Pette, Hart and Di Gtovanna, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP-99-301-008]

Take notice that, on October 10, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, to be effective August 28, 2000.

Substitute Original Sheet No. 14O

Substitute Original Sheet No. 14P

ANR states that this filing is made in compliance with the Commission's Order dated September 27, 2000 in the captioned proceeding.

ANR states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all affected customers and state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26837 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Patrick J. Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 
|   | /s/ Patrick J. Moore                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Patrick J. Moore                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | May 9, 2005                           |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Smurfit-StoneContainer Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
#### McKISSICK v. STATE.

No. 23599.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 26, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for assault with intent to rape, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

*780No statement of facts is in the record, and only one bill of exception. It reflects that the State requested and was granted permission to ask prosecutrix leading questions because she was a child, and inexperienced in court procedure. The bill shows nothing further than that appellant obj ected to this action of the court. In the absence ■of a statement of facts this bill can not be appraised, and under the authorities it is insufficient. The following is quoted from Sec. 159, p. 91, Branch’s Ann.Tex. P. C.: “A bill of exceptions taken because of leading questions must affirmatively exclude any idea that under the peculiar circumstances of the particular case the court was justified in permitting the State to ask leading questions, and if it does not do so no error is shown.” A number of cases are cited as supporting the text, amoung them, Carter v. State, 59 Tex.Cr.R. 73, 127 S.W. 215.

The judgment is affirmed.
<u 

c f5 D) 

1/1 

o 3 

3 " 0) 

3 ^- •O < 

c 

• « (D 

3 (D ro Q . *> =5 

cm" 3 - in OJ 

3 Q . n> 

3 

O 

O 

c at 

m 

m •< 

o 

c r+ 

O o

-

3 ' oa cr 

(1) 

o 

CTQ 3 -

o 

3 fD fD ^ r 

m 

3 Q. 

n — 3- c 3 ' TO 

w 

I 

n o" 

S 

(OH 0)-n 

a 

o 

n 

SO w O 73 ? '^ O 3 -

3 3 ' 

< i " _ ^ g. € Q. 

^'^ 5" O (g 

ft) 7 r 

(0 • < °- € S' ft> O in Oi O ig r j fl) ° ;5 5? ? D . _ § i ?. ? fD o ^ TM "= SI ? =^ 5- ? fT 

i-f- ^ 

O 03 

(/> -3 g . re E . n> ro re ^ s 

I-+ o in re in 3 i2. 3 TO O Q] C 3 2, 5- o > c o- -> re •< S 

3 

re 3-

< 

re 

3 QJ 

3 

• < 

re 

< 

3 •< 

>aco 

re < 3 3 tU CL •< << 

re CO 

re re 3 3 S « 3 re o 

w '3 3 

^^ cr'=3 O f> 05 

00:1 = 

^~'- w o § 

- ;• 3 

-^ w CO 9 o i 

I Q. 

re 

re 

3 in p. 

c 

D (D 

< 

fi) 

< 

D 

O 

3 

3 w" 

O (0 

d 

< 5 

i j O 

X) 

o 

0
Exhibit 32.1
                      Statement Furnished Pursuant to
               Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



     The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Monarch Staffing, Inc. (the "Company"). This Certificate is made
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This
Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "10-KSB Report").   The
undersigned certify that the 10-KSB Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the 10-KSB Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods
presented therein.


Date: October 20, 2006               /s/ Joel Williams
                                     ------------------------------
                                         Joel Williams
                                         Chief Executive Officer


Date: October 20, 2006               /s/ David Walters
                                     ------------------------------
                                         David Walters
                                         Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Monarch Staffing, Inc. and will be retained by Monarch
Staffing, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.



                               End of Filing
#### Leo Daniel LUTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. (Two cases).

Nos. 27348, 27349.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct 27, 1954.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Burglary is the offense; the punishment, eight years in the penitentiary.

Accompanying the record is the affidavit of appellant requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The request is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.01




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biglari Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 14, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Sardar Biglari
 Sardar Biglari, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
 August 13, 2010
 
 
 
 /s/ Duane E. Geiger
 Duane E. Geiger, Interim Chief Financial Officer
 August 13, 2010
<PAGE>

                               SEQUA CORPORATION

            AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 1998 KEY EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION PLAN


      This Amendment No. 1 to the 1998 Key Employees Stock Option Plan,
      effective as of February 26, 1998 (the "Plan"),

                                  WITNESSETH:

      WHEREAS, Sequa Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company")
      maintains the Plan; and

      WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to conform to the
      requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and
      the relevant provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
      amended; and

      WHEREAS, the Company may amend the Plan pursuant to Section 8 thereof;

      NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of May 1, 1998, the Company hereby amends
      the Plan, as set forth below.

      1.    The first paragraph of Section 2 is hereby deleted and replaced in
            its entirety by the following:

            "The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee
            (the "Committee") appointed from time to time by the Board of
            Directors of the Company, which Committee shall consist of not
            less than two (2) members of such Board of Directors.  The
            members of the Committee shall not be eligible to receive
            options and shall be "Non-Employee Directors" as defined in
            Rule 16b-3(b)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
            as amended."

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan is hereby executed
      on this 2nd day of March, 2000.

                                     SEQUA CORPORATION




                                     By: /s/ Stuart Z. Krinsly__________
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Stuart Z. Krinsly
                                          Senior Executive Vice President and
                                          General Counsel
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Triple Net Properties, LLC, the Manager of NNN 2002 Value Fund,LLC (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Scott D. Peters     Scott D. Peters  *Chief Financial Officer*  Triple Net Properties, LLC,  the Manager of NNN 2002 Value Fund, LLCDate: March 28, 2006       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.     The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2005 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general information language in such filing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2013

t0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2013

147184

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147184

COA: 304647

Wayne CC: 10

- 012247

- FC

JAJUAN LAMARR McFARLAND,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 12, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 12, 2016

No. 04-16-00463-CR

IN RE Robert MARTINEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On July 26, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, contending the trial court 

has not ruled on motions he has filed with the trial court. This court is of the opinion that a 

serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the 

petition in this court no later than August 29, 2016. Any such response must conform to 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

It is so ORDERED on August 12, 2016.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013CR6698, styled State of Texas v. Robert Martinez, pending in the 

186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jefferson Moore presiding.
#### HINES v. STATE.

No. 22142.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 20, 1942.

Alex P. Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of driving while intoxicated and assessed a penalty of fifty dollars.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The procedure appears to be regular and there is nothing presented for the consideration of this Court. The judgment of the trial court is, accordingly, affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 15, 2016

t0406

Order 

Clerk

April 15, 2016

151134

TAMIKA HARRELL,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151134

COA: 318744

Wayne CC: 12-003939-NF

TITAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On April 6, 2016, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to 

appeal the January 20, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, 

the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
10.36


 


ON
DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	$
    67,500	 	SMDMM
    FUNDING, LLC	 	November
    4, 2020 
	Amount	 	Lender	 	Date


 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the Undersigned acknowledges that he is indebted to the Lender in the amount stated herein and promises to pay on demand
to the order of SMDMM Funding, LLC a Wyoming limited liability company, with its principal place of business at 3124 Brother
Blvd. Ste 104 Bartlett, TN 38133 (the “Lender”), the principal sum of sixty seven thousand five hundred ($67,500)
together with interest thereon from the date hereof to maturity at with a 10% interest fee.


 


Said
principal sum is due on demand, and in the absence of any demand is due ten years from the date hereof. All installments, prepayments,
and other payments of principal and interest are payable to Lender at 3124 Brother Blvd. Ste 104 Bartlett, TN 38133 or at such other
place as the Lender or holder may hereafter and from time to time designate in writing.


 


This
Note may be prepaid, in whole or in part, without penalty at any time. At maturity, or upon demand or default or failure to pay any installment
of principal and interest required herein, the entire balance shall be immediately due and payable. Any remedy of Lender or holder upon
default of the Undersigned shall be cumulative and not exclusive and choice of remedy shall be at the sole election of Lender or holder.
The Undersigned agrees to pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney’s fees, whether or not any suit, civil action,
or other proceeding at law or in equity, is commenced. The Undersigned waives demand, presentment for payment, protest and notice of
protest and nonpayment of this Note and expressly agrees to remain bound for the payment of principal, interest and other sums provided
for by the terms of this Note, notwithstanding any extension or extensions of the time of, or for the payment of, said principal. No
delay or omission on the part of the Lender or holder in exercising any rights shall operate as a waiver of such right. This Note shall
be governed by the laws of the State of Tennessee, and each party hereto agrees to venue and jurisdiction in the federal and state courts
located in Shelby County, Tennessee.


 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 






    	On Demand Promissory Note Page 1 of 2



    	 



    




 


Executed
on November 4, 2020.


 





	 	 	UNDERSIGNED:
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Printed
    Name: 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Authorized Representative of:	
      Surge Holdings, Inc.
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	WITNESS:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Printed
    Name	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Signature	 	 	 


 




    	On Demand Promissory Note Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2000)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 5407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2684]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2000 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 5407]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2000-10 of January 31, 
                2000

                
Determination Pursuant to Section 523 of the 
                Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related 
                Programs Appropriations Act, 2000, as Contained in the 
                Consolidated Appropriations Act for FY 2000 (Public Law 
                106-113)

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to section 523 of the Foreign Operations, 
                Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations 
                Act, 2000, as Contained in the Consolidated 
                Appropriations Act for FY 2000 (Public Law 106-113), I 
                hereby certify that withholding from international 
                financial institutions and other international 
                organizations and programs funds appropriated or 
                otherwise made available pursuant to that Act is 
                contrary to the national interest.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                determination in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, January 31, 2000.

[FR Doc. 00-2684
Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-M
```