alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 29, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00657

- CV

IN RE Mary Melinda Palacio AKA Melinda PALACIO

,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PC2950

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

S itting : Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Bernard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On October 10, 2017, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The Court is of the

tentative opinion that a serious question concerning the requested relief requires further

consideration. Therefore, the Court requests the filing of a response on or before December 20,

2017

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b)(1).



### PER CURIUM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.5

As of March 31, 2008

StockerYale, Inc.

32
Hampshire Road

Salem, New Hampshire 03079

Attention:        Chief Financial Officer



| | Re: | Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Warrant No. 12082004-1
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------

(Issue Date: December 8, 2004)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to (a) that certain Common Stock Purchase Warrant No. 12082004-1 issued by StockerYale, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the Company) on December 8, 2004 in favor
of PSource Structured Debt Limited (as partial assignee of Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.) (the Holder), providing for the purchase of up to an aggregate amount of 95,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company (the
Warrant) and (b) that certain lockup agreement dated as of the date hereof, made by the Holder in favor of the Company with respect to the Securities defined therein. Capitalized terms used herein that are not defined shall
have the meanings given to them in the Warrant.

In consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree that Expiration Date (as defined in the Warrant) is hereby amended such that Expiration Date shall hereafter mean December 8, 2016.

This letter agreement shall become effective upon receipt by the Holder of a copy of this letter agreement executed by the Company.

Except as specifically amended herein, the Warrant shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and confirmed. The
execution, delivery and effectiveness of this letter agreement shall not operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of the Holder, nor constitute a waiver of any provision of the Warrant. This letter agreement shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]



---

This letter agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in one or more counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Any signature delivered by a party by facsimile transmission shall be deemed to be an original signature hereto.



Very truly yours,PSOURCE STRUCTURED DEBT LIMITEDBy:

Laurus Capital Management, LLC, its investment
managerBy:

/s/ Scott BluesteinName:

Scott BluesteinTitle:

Authorized Signatory




|                         |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|CONSENTED AND AGREED TO:
|                        
|STOCKERYALE, INC.       
|                         | 
|By:                      |  | /s/ Mark W. Blodgett                 
|Name:                    |  | Mark W. Blodgett                     
|Title:                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

AMENDMENT TO WARRANT NO.

(ISSUE DATE: DECEMBER 8, 2004)
Exhibit 31.1
              CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                        PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, David Walters, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Monarch Staffing,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the
audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 18, 2006            /s/ David Walters
                              ---------------------------------------
                                  David Walters
                                  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 00-1331EA

_____________ Jimmy Lee Butler, * * Appellant, * * On Appeal from the United v. * States District Court * for the Eastern District Smith, Captain, Pulaski County Jail; * of Arkansas. Cummings, Miss, Pulaski County Jail; * Ann Ardria, Miss, Finance Office, * [Not To Be Published] Pulaski County Jail; Randy Johnson, * Sheriff, Pulaski County Jail, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 2, 2000 Filed: March 13, 2000

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 TheHonorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Federal inmate Jimmy Lee Butler appeals from the District Court & s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915A order dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three Pulaski County, Arkansas jail officials and an employee in the jail’s financing office, complainingthat he was wrongly charged for meals while he was housed at the jail. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Cooper v. Schriro , 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), we conclude dismissal was proper because Butler has an adequate post-deprivation remedy in state court. See Hudsonv. Palmer , 468 U.S. 517, 530-37 (1984) (when state actor deprives individual of personal property, individual does not have § 1983 claim if state law provides adequate post-deprivation remedy); Ark. R. Crim. P. 15.2 & 15.5 (1999) (providing that motion for return of seized items can be filed or other civil remedies can be pursued); McQuillanv. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp. , 961 S.W.2d 729, 732 (Ark. 1998) (“Conversion is a common-law tort action for the wrongful possession or disposition of another’s property.”).
As to Butler's complaint that the Magistrate Judge lacked authority to “decide” this case, we note that the Magistrate Judge and the District Court Judge followed the procedures outlined in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) in handling the case. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 200 (Monday, October 16, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 61087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26525]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 00-ACE-22]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Elkhart, KS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Elkhart, KS.

DATES:  The direct final rule published at 65 FR 45707 is effective on 
0901 UTC, November 30, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on July 25, 2000 
(65 FR 45707). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on November 30, 2000. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this document confirms that this direct final rule 
will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on September 28, 2000.
Herman J. Lyons, Jr.,
Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 00-26525 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26868]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Small Grants Program for Behavioral Research in Cancer 
Control.
    Date: November 20, 2000.
    Time: 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Ramada Inn Rockville, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Mary Jane Slesinski, Phd Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review and Resources Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8045, Bethesda, 
MD 20892, 301/594-1566.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 11, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-26868 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23 - 0110

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. FRANK WAYNE REINKE,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Appellant Frank Wayne Reinke was granted an extension of time to file and serve the opening brief on or before August 21 , 2023 . The opening brief is now overdue. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file , and serve the opening brief on ap peal no later than September 28 , 2023 . Failure to file the brief within that time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 29 2023

08/29/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0110
Exhibit 10.19


 


Explanatory Note: This document has been translated
from the Chinese-language original for reference purposes only. While this English translation is believed to be generally accurate, it
is subject to, and qualified by, in its entirety, the Chinese-language original. Such Chinese-language original shall be the controlling
document for all purposes.


 


Purchase Advance Payment Contract


 


Party A (payer): Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party B (Payee): Zhenya Xu


 


Party B is Party A’s raw material supplier. In order to reduce
operating costs and enhance the partnership between the two parties, Party A agrees to prepay certain prices for the purchase of corresponding
raw materials for Party B’s obligation to provide Party A with Camellia seeds. After full negotiation by both parties, the following
contracts have been concluded:


 


1. Purpose of advance payment: Party B can only use the advance payment
paid by Party A to purchase camellia seed raw materials, and shall not use it for other purposes.


 


2. Prepaid amount: RMB 6,000,000


 


3. As Party B’s business scope also involves Camellia seed oil,
Party A may also provide Party B with Camellia seed oil of the same value as the advance payment to offset the advance payment. The price
of Camellia seed oil shall be in accordance with Party A’s regulations.


 


4. Repayment method: Party B will deduct the advance payment in the
form of Camellia seeds or equivalent currency to Party A. The repayment period shall not exceed twelve months per year, and special circumstances
shall be negotiated separately.


 


5. Party B promises to provide Party A with Camellia Seeds at a price
that is 2% lower than the actual price of Camellia Seeds on the actual delivery date. After the prepayment is deducted, the settlement
will be based on the actual market price.


 


6. If Party B fails to use the advance payment as required by the agreement,
Party A has the right to recover the advance payment and impose a penalty interest of three thousandths per day for the breached part.


 


7. For matters not covered, the two parties can negotiate and conclude
a supplementary contract. The supplementary contract has the same legal effect as this contract. Any party who fails to negotiate can
bring a lawsuit to the people's court in China.


 


8. This contract is valid for one year, and it will automatically terminate
when it expires.


 


9. This contract has two copies, with each party holding one copy,
and it will take effect from the date of signing.


 


/s/ Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party A: Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Date: May 20, 2020


 


/s/ Zhenya Xu 


Party B: Zhenya Xu


Date: May 20, 2020
Exhibit 99.9


Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers
   We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and reports evaluating OPTI Canada Inc.’s petroleum and natural gas reserves as of December 31, 2010, and the information derived from our reports, as described or incorporated by reference in OPTI Canada Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the United states Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended as applicable.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd.
 
 
 /s/ P. A. WelchP. A. Welch, P. Eng.President & Managing DirectorCalgary, AlbertaMarch 15, 2011
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cytation Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Richard Fisher, Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

     (2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 198 (Thursday, October 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26227]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 6, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Cynthia C. Goodwin, Vice 
President) 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Red Level Financial Corporation, Red Level, Alabama; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
The Peoples Bank of Red Level, Red Level, Alabama.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Calumet Bancorporation, Inc., Chilton, Wisconsin; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of State Bank of Stockbridge, Stockbridge, 
Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 6, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-26227 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-389-010]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate 
Filing

October 4, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) the following Amendment Agreement to 
a recently filed negotiated rate transaction:

Amendment Agreements to ITS-2 Service Agreement No. 69314 between 
Columbia Gulf Transmission Company and Dynegy Marketing and Trade 
dated August 30, 2000, as Amended September 27, 2000.

    Transportation service which was scheduled to commence September 5, 
2000 and terminate September 30, 2000. The parties have executed an 
Amendment Agreement extending the term through October 31, 2000. All 
other terms and provisions remain unchanged and in full force and 
effect.
    Columbia Gulf states that copies of the filing have been served on 
all parties on the official service list created by the Secretary in 
this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission Docket No. RP96-389-010 and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on 
the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26065 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M