alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2714 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow taxpayers to assign 

to another taxpayer the amount of the unused charitable deduction 

for qualified conservation contributions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2013 

Mr. MEADOWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow taxpayers to assign to another taxpayer the amount of the 

unused charitable deduction for qualified conservation 

contributions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Conservation 

5 Empowerment Act of 2013’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2714 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO ASSIGN UNUSED CHARITABLE DE2 DUCTION FOR QUALIFIED CONSERVATION 

3 CONTRIBUTIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 170 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to carryover 

6 of excess contributions) is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(3) EXCESS QUALIFIED CONTRIBUTION CON9 TRIBUTIONS.— 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any amount of the ex11 cess qualified conservation contributions for any 

12 taxable year may be assigned by the taxpayer to 

13 any other person. 90 percent of the amount so 

14 assigned shall be treated as contributions made 

15 by such other person and not by the taxpayer, 

16 and the remainder of the amount so assigned 

17 shall not be treated as charitable contributions. 

18 ‘‘(B) EXCESS CONSERVATION CONTRIBU19 TIONS.—For purposes of this paragraph, the 

20 term ‘excess conservation contributions’ means, 

21 with respect to any taxable year, the lesser of— 

22 ‘‘(i) the amount which would, by rea23 son of this subsection or any other provi24 sion of this section, be treated as a chari25 table contribution paid in a succeeding tax26 able year, over 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 2714 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) the qualified conservation con2 tributions paid (or treated as paid) during 

3 the taxable year.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Gerald
      McIlhargey, President and Chief Executive Officer of St. Joseph, Inc., certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report
      on
      Form 10-KSB/A of St. Joseph, Inc., for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007,
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Annual Report on
      Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of St. Joseph, Inc.




Date:
      September 9, 2008





By: */s/* Gerald McIlhargey


Name:
      Gerald McIlhargey


Title:
      President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The notes to the condensed  consolidated  financial  statements  are an integral
part of such statements and the condensed  consolidated financial information in
this schedule. Figures below are in thousands, except per-share data.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                          11,552
<SECURITIES>                                    36,270
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,838
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,034
<INVENTORY>                                    107,383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               284,947
<PP&E>                                          81,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 357,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,412
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,237
<OTHER-SE>                                     243,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   357,284
<SALES>                                        131,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,805
<CGS>                                           85,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,795
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   837
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,435
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,315
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,120
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,120
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas S. Smith, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Silver Mines, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting for the Registrant and we have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 11, 2008

By:      /s/ Thomas S. Smith



Thomas S. Smith, President and Director
Exhibit 31.2
              CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, David Walters, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Monarch Staffing,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.  The small business issuers other certifying officer and I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the
audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 5, 2006        /s/ David Walters
                              ---------------------------------------
                                  David Walters
                                  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, James M. Papada, III, Chief Executive Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended July 1, 2005
      (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2)   information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Technitrol, Inc.

Dated:  August 9, 2005
        --------------

                                            /s/ James M. Papada, III
                                            ------------------------
                                            James M. Papada, III

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be
retained by Technitrol, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of
the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 21 M tO AUSTIN DIVISION 

MICHAEL C. DEMARQUIS § 

PLAINTIFF, § 

§ 

V. § § ALORICA, INC., § 

DEFENDANT. § 

CAUSE NO. 1:20-CV-634-LY 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF 

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Before the court in the above-styled and numbered cause of action are Defendant Alorica, 

Inc.'s ("Alorica") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed September 18, 2020 

(Doc. #16), Plaintiff Michael C. DeMarquis's response filed October 23, 2020 (Doc. #19), and 

Alorica's reply filed November 5, 2020 (Doc. #20). 

This motion was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for report and 

recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Loc. R. W.D. Tex. App'x C, R. 1(d). 

The magistrate judge signed a report and recommendation on May 12, 2021 (Doc. #22), 

recommending that this court grant Alorica's motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 1 2(b)(6) and dismiss DeMarquis' s complaint without prejudice. The magistrate judge 

further recommended that the court set a deadline by which DeMarquis may file an amended 

complaint. 

A party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and 

recommendations of a magistrate judge within 14 days after being served with a copy of the report 

and recommendation and thereby secure de novo review by the district court. See 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). A party's failure to timely file written objections to the 

proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation in a report and recommendation bars that 

Case 1:20-cv-00634-LY Document 23 Filed 06/21/21 Page 1 of 2
party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed 

factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court. See Douglass v. United 

Services AutoAss'n, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996) (enbanc). 

The record shows that all parties had notice of the report and recommendations by May 13, 

2021, and that objections were due on or before May 27, 2021. To date, no objections have been 

filed. The court, having reviewed the entire record and finding no plain error, accepts and adopts 

the report and recommendation filed in this cause for substantially the reasons stated therein. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 

(Doc. #22) is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED by the court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Alorica's motion to dismiss (Doc. #16) is GRANTED. 

DeMarquis's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that DeMarquis may file an amended complaint to cure the 

deficiencies in his allegations regarding Alorica' s status as a "debt collector" under the Fair Debt 

.1-i 

Collection Practices Act or the Texas Debt Collection Act on or before 

2021. 

SIGNED this day of June, 2021. 

UNI DSTATESD 

Case 1:20-cv-00634-LY Document 23 Filed 06/21/21 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7155

DOMINICO L. LEE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (2:07-cv-00262-JBF)

Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 18, 2007

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dominico L. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Dominico L. Lee seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude Lee has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
The graph below uses CEMS data to illustrate why a longer term average results in a lower limit.

In essence, longer term averages allow particularly high (or low) measurements to be averaged with ma ny more measurements closer to the mean. This results in the highest averages from a longer term averaging period (e.g. 90 days) being lower than the highest averages in a shorter term averaging period. (e.g. 30 days). We have illustrated this concept by taking Hg CEMS data and calculating rolling 30 day a verages (in blue) and rolling 90 day averages (in green). As you can see, the 30 day averages have greater variability and thus higher peaks and valleys. The 90 day average has less variability, therefore the sam e unit is able to meet a tighter 90 day lim it.
#### Martha ELLIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27171.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 17, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Thu conviction is for a violation of the liquor law in Navarro County. The penalty assessed is a fine of $200.

The State’s Attorney before this court has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the record reflects that the appellant has failed to enter into a recognizance during term time or to execute an appeal bond after the adjournment of the term of court at which the conviction was had. In the absence of such recognizance or appeal bond in the record, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. It is therefore dismissed.
Exhibit
31.1





Rule
13a - 14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer





I, Wenxia
Guo, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-Q of Worldwide Biotech & Pharmaceutical
Company;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
small business issuer and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and





5. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.








Date: May
19, 2008





/s/
Wenxia Guo


Wenxia
Guo


Chief
Executive Officer