alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MACHENS et al. v. MACHENS.

No. 43851.

Supreme Court of Missouri. Division No. 1.

April 12, 1954.

*652Wm. Waye, Jr., B. H. Dyer, St..Charles, for appellant.

Robert V. Niedner, Paul F. Niedner, Niedner & Niedner, St. Charles, for respondents.

HYDE, Presiding Judge.

Appeal from order of the Circuit Court of Warren County, suspending letters testamentary as executor of the will of Henry Machens, deceased, granted to Andrew Machens, Jr. by the Probate Court of St. Charles County and appointing Andrew Machens, Sr. as administrator pendente lite of the estate of Henry Machens, deceased, because of a will contest brought in the Circuit Court of St. Charles County. This same action had been taken by the Probafe Court of St. Charles County and Andrew Machens, Jr. appealed to the Circuit Court. The case went to Warren County on change of venue.

Appellant raised the question of the validity of the order on two principal grounds: That the order of the Probate Court was without due process of law having been made without notice or hearing; and that the statute, Section 461.090 RSMo1949, V.A.M.S., by authority of which the orders were made, was unconstitutional because of failure to comply with Sec. 23, Art. 3, 1945 Constitution, Sec. 28,.Art. 4, 1875 Const. V.A.M.S., requiring the subject to be clearly expressed in the title of the bill by which it was enacted. However, both appellant and respondents now agree that this, case has become moot because of our decision affirming the judgment of the circuit court finding the, will invalid. Machens v. Machens, Mo.Sup., 263 S.W.2d 724. The question upon which they do not agree is: Who should have to pay the costs ?

Appellant cites State ex rel. Myers v. Shinnick, Mo.Sup., 19 S.W.2d 676, in which w« dismissed an .appeal as moot but ordered that appellant recover his costs, up to the date when the case became moot by reason of an order of the Kansas City Board of Zoning Appeals' granting.him the relief he was seeking. However, in that case, by making the order, it was conceded- that appellant’s contentions were correct and that he was entitled to what he sought and he was given the relief which was the subject matter of his action. That is not the situation in this case. Instead respondents have continued to claim that appellant was not entitled to the relief he sought and were successful as contestants in obtaining a final judgment setting aside the will under which appellant claimed the right to act as executor. Thus respondents have successfully maintained their claim that appellant never did have any right at all to act as executor. Under these circumstances we think the costs of this case should be assessed against appellant and we so hold.

It is, therefore, ordered .that the appeal be dismissed and the costs be assessed against appellant.

All concur.
Exhibit 23.2
 
 CONSENT OF
 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  To the Board of Directors
  SONDE RESOURCES CORP.
  We hereby consent to the use in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of our Auditors’ Report dated April 29, 2009 (except as to Note 6 which is as of March 25, 2011) with respect to the consolidated statement of operations, comprehensive loss, and deficit and cash flows of Sonde Resources Corp. (formerly Canadian Superior Energy Inc.) (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is contained in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
  /s/ Meyers Norris Penny LLP
 
 Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 Calgary, Canada
 March 25, 2011
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2768 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that a duty of 

the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is to ensure that Internal Revenue 

Service employees are familiar with and act in accord with certain taxpayer rights. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2013 

Mr. ROSKAM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

that a duty of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue 

is to ensure that Internal Revenue Service employees 

are familiar with and act in accord with certain taxpayer 

rights. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Bill of 

5 Rights Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2768 IH

1 SEC. 2. DUTY TO ENSURE THAT IRS EMPLOYEES ARE FA2 MILIAR WITH AND ACT IN ACCORD WITH CER3 TAIN TAXPAYER RIGHTS. 

4 Section 7803 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

5 is amended by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph 

6 (4) and by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 

7 paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(3) EXECUTION OF DUTIES IN ACCORD WITH

9 TAXPAYER RIGHTS.—In discharging his duties, the 

10 Commissioner shall ensure that employees of the In11 ternal Revenue Service are familiar with and act in 

12 accord with taxpayer rights as afforded by other 

13 provisions of this title, including— 

14 ‘‘(A) the right to be informed, 

15 ‘‘(B) the right to be assisted, 

16 ‘‘(C) the right to be heard, 

17 ‘‘(D) the right to pay no more than the 

18 correct amount of tax, 

19 ‘‘(E) the right of appeal, 

20 ‘‘(F) the right to certainty, 

21 ‘‘(G) the right to privacy, 

22 ‘‘(H) the right to confidentiality, 

23 ‘‘(I) the right to representation, and 

24 ‘‘(J) the right to a fair and just tax sys25 tem.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

JASON LEE VAN DYKE §

Plaintiff §

§

v. § Case No. 1:20:MC-657-LY

§

THOMAS CHRISTOPHER RETZLAFF §

a/k/a Dean Anderson d/b/a BV Files, Via §

View Files L.L.C., and ViaView Files §

Defendant §

NOTICE OF CONSENT TO TRANSFER

TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES JUDGE:

Movant James McGibney has reviewed Dkt. 5 within Case No. 1:20:MC-657-

LY and concurs with the motion of the United States to transfer Movants Motion to 

Quash, Dkt. 1 and their motion to quash and transfer, Dkt. 5, to EDTX. 

I. PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Movant prays that this Court 

enters an order transferring Movants Motion to Quash, Dkt. 1 and the United States 

Motion to Quash, Dkt. 5 to the Eastern District of Texas.

Case 1:20-mc-00657-LY Document 17 Filed 06/29/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James McGibney

James McGibney

4305 Ridgebend Dr

Round Rock, TX 78665

Phone: 408-601-0685

Email: james@bullyville.com

Movant, Pro Se

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of this motion was sent to Plaintiff Jason Lee Van Dyke,

Attorney for Defendant, Jeffrey Lee Dorrell and AUSA Kristina Baehr via email on Monday, 

6-29-2020. 

/s/ James McGibney

JAMES MCGIBNEY

Case 1:20-mc-00657-LY Document 17 Filed 06/29/20 Page 2 of 2
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

June 7, 2024 SC-2024-0178 Ex parte Arthur Corte Dyas PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: Arthur Corte Dyas v. Ellen Hunter Dyas) (Baldwin Circuit Court: DR-18-900248.01; Civil Appeals: CL-2022-1134). CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on June 7, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Mitchell, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Bryan, and Mendheim, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                       107
<INVENTORY>                                      6,699
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,285
<PP&E>                                           9,954
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,749)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,733
<BONDS>                                          1,683
<COMMON>                                         2,842
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,885
<SALES>                                          4,537
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,537
<CGS>                                            2,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     6
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (226)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (233)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (233)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
Note - EPS information has been prepared in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, and basic and diluted EPS have been
entered in place of primary and fully diluted, respectively.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            41754
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     68755
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                       62897
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 179371
<PP&E>                                           131358
<DEPRECIATION>                                    56699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   299054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             95219
<BONDS>                                           28884
<COMMON>                                           2023
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                       165936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     299054
<SALES>                                          328985
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 328985
<CGS>                                            224738
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    224738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   40201
<INCOME-TAX>                                      14968
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               25233
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      25233
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.56
        

</TABLE>
## NO. 12

- 18

- 00305

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:
MARTIN REYNOLDS, JR. ,
RELATOR §

§

§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM On November 5, 2018, Martin Reynolds, J r. filed this original proceeding to challenge Respondent’s failure to sign and file a written order granting or denying his pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus. 1 The Real Party in Interest, the State of Texas, subsequently filed a response to Reynolds’s petition and informed this Court that Respondent signed and filed an order denying Reynolds’s application for writ of habeas corpus. In her order, Respondent determined that Reynolds’s application for writ of habeas corpus is premature, rejected his constitutional c hallenge to Section 9.31(b)(5)(A) of the Texas Penal Code, and denied both the application and motion to quash the indictment. The order is dated November 5, 2018. Thus, Reynolds has obtained the relief sought in his petition for writ of
mandamus. Accord ingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot

. Opinion delivered December 12, 2018. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

1 Respondent is the Honorable Christi J. Kennedy, Judge of the 114th District Court in Smith County, Texas.2 

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

DECEMBER 12 , 2018

NO. 12

- 18

- 00305

- CR

MARTIN REYNOLDS, JR. ,

Relator V.

HON. CHRISTI J. KENNEDY ,

Respondent

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Martin Reynolds, Jr.; who is the relator in Cause No. 114

- 0005

- 18, pending on the docket of the 114th
Judicial District Court of Smith County , Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having be en filed herein on November 5, 2018, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue , it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed

as moot

. By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
F r

o m : B r i a n Sh r

a g er /R T P / U S E PA / U S T o :" H i gg i n s, C o r t n e y" < C o r t n e y

_ H i gg i n s @ o mb

. e o p

. g o

v> C c : R o b er t

J W a y l a n d /R T P

/ U S E PA / U S D at e : 11/ 0 2/2 0 11 0 5 : 11 P M S u b j e c t : D R A F T M

AC T F l oo r M

e m o

C o r t n e y ,

Per y o u r re q u e s t

, atta ch e d i s t h e n ew d r a f t M AC T f l o o r m e m o a l o n g w

i t h t h e f i n a l r u l e m e m o t h at

pr o v i d e s c o mp l e t e d e s c r i p t i o n s o f s t

at i s t i c a l

m e t h o d s

. T h e n ew m e m o pr o v i d e s a n u pd at

e b u t d o e s n o t

repe at i n f

o r m a t i o n t h a t h a s n o t ch a n g e d

.

T h a n k s !

B r i a n

( S e e atta ch e d f

i l e : M AC T F l o o r M

e m o 11

- 0

1

- 11

. d o c x )( S ee att

a c h e d f i l e : R e v i s e d M AC T F l o o r A n a l y

s i s ( 2 0 11 ) f o r t h e I n d u s t r i a l

, C o mm er c i a l

, a n d I n s t i t u t i o n a l B o i l er

s a n d Pr o c e s s H e at er s N E SH AP * M

a j o r S o u r c e v 2

. pd f )



### P a g e 1 o f 1
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
  Pursuant to the requirement set forth
in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), Dustin M. Shindo, Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Hoku Scientific, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “ Company
”) hereby certifies that, to
the best of his knowledge, as follows:
  The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2009,
to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “ Periodic
Report ”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  INWITNESSWHEREOF,
      the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 15th day of June,
      2009.
  By:
              
              /s/
      DUSTIN M. SHINDODustin
      M. ShindoChairman
      of the Board of Directors,President
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been provided to
Hoku Scientific, Inc. and will be retained by Hoku Scientific, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of Hoku Scientific, Inc. under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5485 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5485

    To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain narrow woven 
                                fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain narrow woven 
                                fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN NARROW WOVEN FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Narrow woven        Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          fabrics (other                                                    12/31/2015
                          than ribbons),
                          not pile, of man-
                          made fibers, not
                          containing by
                          weight 5% or more
                          of elastomeric
                          yarn or rubber
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          5806.32.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26960]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetics and Digestive and Kidney 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB 4J1.
    Date: November 29-30, 2000.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 7 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The San Luis Resort and Conference Center, 5222 Seawall 
Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77551.
    Contact Person: William E. Elzinga, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA NIDDK, Room 647, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600; 
(301) 594-8895.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 13, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-26960 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
H. R. 272 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense joint 

outpatient clinic to be constructed in Marina, California, as the ‘‘Major General 

William H. Gourley VA–DOD Outpatient Clinic’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAME OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AND 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE JOINT OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 

MARINA, CALIFORNIA. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Affairs and 

Department of Defense joint outpatient clinic to be constructed 

at the intersection of the proposed Ninth Street and the proposed 

First Avenue in Marina, California, shall be known and designated 

as the ‘‘Major General William H. Gourley VA–DOD Outpatient 

Clinic’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, regulation, map, 

document, record, or other paper of the United States to the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense joint outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 

a reference to the ‘‘Major General William H. Gourley VA–DOD 

Outpatient Clinic’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.