alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 15, 2014

NO. 03

- 11

- 00613

- CR

John Richard Ahrens, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBE RTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment s of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and t he parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment s . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment s of conviction

.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of cos ts is made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K DATED
DECEMBER 26, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<CIK> 0000094673
<NAME> STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-26-1997
<CASH>                                       256,319
<SECURITIES>                                  77,275
<RECEIVABLES>                                645,905
<ALLOWANCES>                                  17,924
<INVENTORY>                                  205,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,269,611
<PP&E>                                       794,853
<DEPRECIATION>                               489,731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,740,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        608,405
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      10,800
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,101,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,740,017
<SALES>                                    1,541,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           2,144,656
<CGS>                                        838,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,171,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             209,526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              316,117
<INCOME-TAX>                                  84,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          231,817
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 231,817
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.89

        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the annual report of Shaka Shoes, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ James Scott
James ScottChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)  Dated: July 13, 2011
Exhibit 99.1         
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002      
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sequa Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Norman E. Alexander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:    
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.            
/s/  NORMAN E. ALEXANDER   
Norman E. Alexander   
Chief Executive Officer   
November 14, 2002
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0359. GARRETT LEE BAILEY v. THE STATE.

A jury found Garrett Lee Bailey guilty of malice murder, and the trial court

sentenced him to life in prison. After Bailey withdrew his motion for new trial, he

filed this appeal. Under our Constitution, however, the Supreme Court has appellate

jurisdiction over “[a]ll cases in which a sentence of death was imposed or could be

imposed.” See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8). Because a penalty

of death can be imposed for the crime of murder, jurisdiction is proper in the Supreme

Court. See OCGA § 17-10-30 (b); Neal v. State, 290 Ga. 563, 572 (722 SE2d 765)

(2012) (Hunstein, C. J., concurring); see also State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524 (1) (322

SE2d 711) (1984) (directing this Court to transfer “all cases in which either a

sentence of death or of life imprisonment has been imposed upon conviction of

murder”). Accordingly, this is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for

disposition. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/04/2015

November 04, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2693 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2693

  To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit a report to 
     Congress on security screening by the Transportation Security 
   Administration of veterans and other passengers with amputations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 16, 2013

  Mr. Cook (for himself, Mr. Runyan, and Mr. O'Rourke) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                                Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit a report to 
     Congress on security screening by the Transportation Security 
   Administration of veterans and other passengers with amputations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Screening Amputees and Veterans with 
Efficiency and Dignity Act'' or the ``Save Dignity Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON TSA SCREENING OF VETERANS AND OTHER PASSENGERS WITH 
              PROSTHESES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a 
report to Congress by not later than 6 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act on security screening by the Transportation 
Security Administration of veterans and other passengers with 
amputations, with or without prosthesis.
    (b) Contents.--The report shall include analysis of--
            (1) the disparities that exist between airports in the 
        screening of such passengers;
            (2) identification of the airports at which the 
        Administration uses procedures and methods for such screening 
        that are efficient, safe, timely, and respectful of such 
        passengers, and airports at which the Administration does not 
        use such procedures and methods; and
            (3) description of actions that will be taken by the 
        Administration to implement such procedures and methods at all 
        airports at which the Administration performs security 
        screening of passengers.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PATHMARK
STORES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 39 WEEKS ENDED
NOVEMBER 1, 1997 AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                           8,352
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,400)
<INVENTORY>                                    202,803
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               274,920
<PP&E>                                         968,210
<DEPRECIATION>                               (417,912)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 928,075
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          394,809
<BONDS>                                      1,259,681
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,076,531)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   928,075
<SALES>                                      2,755,138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,755,138
<CGS>                                        1,985,552
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,985,552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   148
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (122,920)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (45,544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,167
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,377)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (7,488)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,865)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.23



AMENDMENT 1
Contract for Services Dated May 20, 2005



Under the existing contract, NGP and DJF have agreed that the total fee for the assignment covered by the Contract wi11 not exceed $5,000. There has now been a change of circumstances by which NGP has been requested by Sierra Pacific to negotiate a Long Term Firm Power Purchase Agreement and Renewable Energy Credit Purchase Agreement for a geothermal power plant which NGP intends to develop at Blue Mountain, Nevada. NGP has requested that DJF be a participant on the negotiating team for the successful execution of those contracts and DJF has agreed to so participate.

Currently the Professional Fees section of the May 20th contract has a $5,000 limit. NGP and DJF wish to eliminate the $5,000 limit on the total fees by deleting Total fees for this assignment are not to exceed $5,000 from this contract. NGP and DJF wish to insert Fees are to be billed as they occur at the end of each month. Total fees will not exceed $12,500, until such time that NGP and DJF renegotiate the agreement.

Further, NGP and DJF wish to acknowledge that the expenses involved in performing the assignment will exceed $500. Consequently expenses in excess of $250 for any single item are to be pre-approved by NGP.







/s/ Brian D. Fairbank
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2769 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2769

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To impose a moratorium on conferences held by the Internal Revenue 
                                Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Playing on Citizens' Cash 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON IRS CONFERENCES.

    The Internal Revenue Service shall not hold any conference until 
the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration submits a report 
to Congress--
            (1) certifying that the Internal Revenue Service has 
        implemented all of the recommendations set out in such 
        Inspector General's report titled ``Review of the August 2010 
        Small Business/Self-Employed Division's Conference in Anaheim, 
        California'', and
            (2) describing such implementation.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2769

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To impose a moratorium on conferences held by the Internal Revenue 
                                Service.
```
Exhibit 23.1              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM    We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries for the period ended October 1, 2006, as indicated in our report dated October 25, 2006; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements File No.'s 333-02683, 333-05231, 333-15851, 333-43055, 333-51189, 333-51181, 333-57779, 333-84483 and 333-86492.  We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.     /S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP    Dayton, Ohio October 31, 2006
#### Gilbert BROCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 23775.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 15, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

' Conviction is for burglary, punishment assessed being four years in the penitentiary.

Upon the overruling of appellant’s motion for new trial he gave notice of appeal. He now files his personal affidavit advising this court that he desires to prosecute his appeal no further, and at his request the appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 2-74613 on Form S-16and No. 33-66474 on Form S-8 of EnergySouth, Inc. (the “Company”), as successor to Mobile GasService Corporation, No. 333-02271 on Form S-3, and No. 333-103713 on Form S-8 of the Company, ofour report dated November 30, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company forthe year ended September 30, 2005.   /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP   DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP  Atlanta, Georgia  December 14, 2005
KPMG**KPMG**LLP**Chartered
                  Accountants**
              
              Telephone
                  (416) 228-7000Yonge
                  Corporate Centre
              
              Telefax
                  (416) 228-71234100
                  Yonge Street, Suite 200
              
              www.kpmg.caNorth
                  York, ON M2P 2H3





**Consent
                of Independent Registered Public Accounting
                Firm**







The
      Board
      of Directors of YM BioSciences Inc.:







We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
      333-134410) on Form S-8 and in the registration statement (No. 333-120153)
      on
      Form F-3 of YM Biosciences Inc. (the “Company”) of our audit report dated
      September 15, 2008 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the
      Company. as at June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated statements
      of
      operations and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in
      the
      three-year period ended June 30, 2008 and our report dated September 15,
      2008 **** on
      the
      effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
      June 30, 2008, which reports are included in the annual report on Form 20-F
      of
      the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.













Chartered
      Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants




Toronto,
      Canada




September
      18, 2008
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
(A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,


UNITED
STATES CODE)




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Annual
Report for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-K”) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




Dated: November 26, 2010
              /s/ Nadav KidronNadav Kidron, President and Chief Executive OfficerDated: November 26, 2010
              /s/ Yifat ZommerYifat Zommer, Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 3, 2015

s0223 

# Order

Clerk March 3, 2015

149533

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149533

COA: 321933

Wayne CC: 96

- 503804

- FH

JAMES M. JOHNSTON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2014 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. TM99-1-22-010]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

February 1, 2000.
    Take notice that on January 27, 2000, CNG Transmission Corporation 
(CNG), filed as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 
1, the following revised tariff sheets:

Eighth Substitute 17th Revised Sheet No. 31
Fourth Substitute 19th Revised Sheet No. 35

    CNG requests an effective date of November 1, 1998, for Eighth 
Substitute 17th Revised Sheet No. 31 and an effective date of January 
1, 1999, for Fourth Substitute 19th Revised Sheet No. 35.
    CNG states that the purpose of its filing is to correct two 
inadvertent and recently discovered errors appearing on two tariff 
sheets filed on November 10, 1999, in Docket No. TM99-1-22-008. CNG 
also states that the changes do not affect the amounts billed to CNG's 
customers.
    CNG states that copies of its filing are being served upon the 
parties listed on the Official Service List of the proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-2656 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5738 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2012 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 15285 Samohin Drive in Macomb, Michigan, 

as the ‘‘Lance Cpl. Anthony A. DiLisio Clinton-Macomb 

Carrier Annex’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

HR 5738 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. LANCE CPL. ANTHONY A. DILISIO CLINTON2 MACOMB CARRIER ANNEX. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 15285 Samohin Drive in 

5 Macomb, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Lance Cpl. Anthony A. DiLisio Clinton-Macomb Carrier 

7 Annex’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lance Cpl. Anthony 

12 A. DiLisio Clinton-Macomb Carrier Annex’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 28, 

2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with