alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*David L. De Lancett, Defendant.

County Court, Jefferson County,

March 12, 1958.

*Frederic S. Kendall*for defendant.

*Angus Q. Saunders, District Attorney,*for plaintiff.

Milton A. Wiltse, J.

The defendant, David L. De Lancett, above named, through his attorney, Frederic S. Kendall, Esq., moves for an order granting permission to inspect the Grand Jury minutes upon which the indictment herein is based, and also moves for a dismissal of the indictment against said *1022defendant, David L. De Lancett, alleging that testimony produced before the Grand Jury was insufficient to support the said indictment as a matter of law.

The indictment in question was returned by the February, 1958 Grand Jury of Jefferson County, held in connection with a Trial Term of the Supreme Court in and for said county, and was thereafter transferred to the County Court of Jefferson County, by order duly entered in the office of the Clerk of said county, for further proceedings.

A transcript of the testimony that was considered by the said Grand Jury has been read and examined by the court, and all specifications relied upon by counsel, as grounds for said application, have been carefully considered.

The evidence here presented to the Grand Jury, with respect to the defendant, appears to fall short of the requirements under the law with respect to the indictment returned. The record does not substantiate that there was sufficient or legal testimony, before the Grand Jury which returned the said indictment, to warrant the finding of the same.

Although the motion herein was primarily for the inspection of the Grand Jury minutes, preparatory to moving to dismiss the indictment, it appears that where the indictment has been found without sufficient evidence, or upon illegal testimony, the court has inherent power to dismiss the indictment without passing upon the motion for an order to inspect the Grand Jury minutes. *(People*v. *Walsh,*92 Misc. 573; *People*v. *Hirschberg,*37 N. Y. S. 2d 861.)

That being the situation in the instant matter, and the defendant having also moved to dismiss the indictment as above mentioned, the indictment as to David L. De Lancett, the defendant herein, is dismissed, with leave to the District Attorney to resubmit the matter to another Grand Jury, upon application to the proper court within statutory limits of time, the motion to inspect the Grand Jury minutes being not passed upon.
#### NORTH v. STATE.

No. 23789.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 12, 1947.

Fryer & Milstead, of El Paso,- for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for procuring with a fine of $100 and three months in the county jail.

The appellant and one other person were charged by separate complaint with the offense of procuring. The prosecuting witness was a young woman who had been brought to El Paso by the other party and immediately placed in contact with appellant. Their operations thereafter were in accordance with an understanding between them, and sufficiently involved appellant to warrant the jury verdict. The revolting evidence need not be reviewed.

We find in the record twenty-one bills of exception, which we have carefully examined. With the qualifications given by the court, and fully substantiated by the statement of facts, we do not think that any of them reflect error or raise a question of sufficient importance to require a discussion.

We find no reversible error and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
The undersigned officer of The Stride Rite Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended February 27, 2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose
whatsoever.



Date:       April 8, 2004           Name:       /s/ David M. Chamberlain
      ------------------------            ------------------------------------

                                    Title:      Chairman and CEO
                                           -----------------------------------
EXHIBIT
32.B


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2008, of Southern Natural Gas Company (the “Company”) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, John R. Sult, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Controller certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ John
      R. SultJohn
      R. SultSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)Southern
      Natural Gas CompanyAugust
      8, 2008















































A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Southern Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Southern Natural Gas
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Azhar M. Chaudhary v. Victoria A. Mora and Kristie R. Salter

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00352

- CV

Trial court case number: 18

- DCV

- 254442

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

The motion for r e hearing is denied

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Peter Kelly

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Goodman, and Guerra.

Date: December 13, 2022
EXHIBIT 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, James E. Laurent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sunair Electronics,
Inc.;

1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

3. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.


DATE: May 17, 2004

/s/ James E. Laurent
-------------------------------------
James E. Laurent
President and Chief Executive Officer
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1129

___________ Bluett Reginald Cameron, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 23, 1997 Filed: July 1, 1998

___________ Before MCMILLIAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Bluett Reginald Cameron pleaded guilty in 1992 to cocaine distribution an d unlaw fuluse of a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime, and receive d consecutive sentences of 121 and 60 months' impri sonment for the respective offenses. Heno w brings a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, seeking to vacate his sentence on th e firearm conviction, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Bailey v. United States , 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995). The district court denied his petition for relief, and CameronTh is case has been considered by the panel under the terms of Eighth Circui t 1 Rule 47E. -2- appeals. Because of the Supreme Court's decision in Bousley v. United States , 118 S. Ct. 1604 (1998), we reverse and remand to the district court for further consideration. 1 A true copy. ATTEST: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2778 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2778

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify eligibility for 
                         the child tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2013

Mr. Kingston (for himself, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Posey, Mr. Pitts, Mr. 
Brady of Texas, Mrs. Bachmann, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Flores, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. 
 Barton, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Brooks of Alabama, and Mr. Broun of Georgia) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify eligibility for 
                         the child tax credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Tax Credit Integrity 
Preservation Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR CHILD TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (e) of section 24 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``under this section to a 
taxpayer'' and all that follows and inserting ``under this section to 
any taxpayer unless--
            ``(1) such taxpayer includes the taxpayer's valid 
        identification number (as defined in section 6428(h)(2)) on the 
        return of tax for the taxable year, and
            ``(2) with respect to any qualifying child, the taxpayer 
        includes the name and taxpayer identification number of such 
        qualifying child on such return of tax.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Marvin E. HEINRICHS v. STATE.

No. 26593.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 11, 1953.

No attorney for appellant. ■

. Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin,- for the State. .

DAVIDSON, .Commissioner,.

The opinion in the case of Heinrichs v. State; Tex.Cr.App., 263 S.W.2d *777,*this day decided, and also that of Phillips v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 263 S.W.2d 159, are in all things here applicable and controlling, and adopted as the opinion in this case.

For the reasons there stated, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Charles M. Weaver, certify that:

     1.   I have  reviewed  this  annual  report on Form 10-K in  respect of the
          Corporate Backed Trust Certificates,  Motorola Debenture-Backed Series
          2002-14  Trust (the  "Trust")  and all reports on Form 8-K  containing
          distribution  or  servicing  reports of the Trust  filed in respect of
          periods  included  in the year  covered by this  annual  report of the
          Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge,  the  information in these reports,  taken as a
          whole,  does not contain any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the  statements  made,
          in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
          report;

     3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  distribution  or  servicing  information
          required  to be  provided to the  Depositor  by the Trustee  under the
          pooling and  servicing or similar  agreement,  for  inclusion in these
          reports is included in these reports; and

     4.   I am  responsible  for  reviewing  the  activities  performed  by  the
          Depositor  and the Trustee  under the pooling and servicing or similar
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
          required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
          the Depositor and Trustee have each  fulfilled its  obligations  under
          that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 21, 2007


         /s/ CHARLES M. WEAVER
----------------------------------------
Charles M. Weaver, Senior Vice President
1 

4050020-1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

BRYNNE SOUKUP, ) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-648-RP 

v. ) 

) 

FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. and ) 

FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS, LLC, ) 

Defendants. ) 

ORDER 

Considering the foregoing Joint Motion to Continue the Parties’ Expert Report Deadlines; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Motion to Continue the Parties’ Expert 

Report Deadlines is GRANTED. Plaintiff Brynne Soukup’s deadline to serve expert reports is 

extended until May 11, 2021, and Defendant Flight Services & Systems, LLC’s deadline to serve 

expert reports is extend until June 11, 2021. 

Austin, Texas, this ______ day of ____________, 2021. 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 34-1 Filed 03/23/21 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS REPORTED ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,526,774
<SECURITIES>                                20,173,151
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,056,481
<PP&E>                                          54,903
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,295,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,975,004
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       207,206
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,113,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,295,832
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,594,914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             344,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,199,586)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,199,586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,199,586)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.48)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32**

 

**NORTHERNGROWERS, LLC**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned, RobertNarem, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of NorthernGrowers, LLC (the “Company”), has executed this Certification in connectionwith the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”).

 

The undersigned herebycertifies that:

 

•                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

•                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certification as of the 26th day of May, 2005.

 

 
|   | /s/  Robert Narem                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Robert Narem                                         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

d0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

140059

LEWIS C. HART, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140059 COA: 286879 Jackson CC: 08-001951-AH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 3, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 11

Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-12 Filed 03/17/21 Page 1 of 7
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-12 Filed 03/17/21 Page 2 of 7
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-12 Filed 03/17/21 Page 3 of 7
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-12 Filed 03/17/21 Page 4 of 7
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-12 Filed 03/17/21 Page 5 of 7
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-12 Filed 03/17/21 Page 6 of 7
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-12 Filed 03/17/21 Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT 13.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Nevada Geothermal Power, Inc., a company organized under the British Columbia Company Act (the Company), on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Brian D. Fairbank, President/CEO of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and result of operations

of the Company.



/s/ Brian D. Fairbank

Brian D. Fairbank, President/CEO





Date: January 12, 2006
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5537 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain warp knit fabrics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. YOUNG of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain warp knit 

fabrics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WARP KNIT FABRICS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Warp knit fabrics (including those made on galloon 

knitting machines), other 

than those of headings 

6001 to 6004: Of synthetic 

fibers: Printed (provided 

for in subheading 

6005.34.00) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5537 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS