alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 288 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 288

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 
     children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2013

 Mr. Michaud (for himself and Mr. Walz) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 
     children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CHAMPVA Children's Protection Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE FOR CHILDREN ELIGIBLE FOR MEDICAL CARE 
              UNDER CHAMPVA PROGRAM.

    (a) Increase.--Section 1781(c) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``twenty-three'' and inserting ``twenty-
        six''; and
            (2) by striking ``twenty-third birthday'' and inserting 
        ``twenty-sixth birthday''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to medical care provided on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

WALTER MITCHELL STEWART, Jr., 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-30086

D.C. No. 1:12-cr-00086-DWM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2016** 

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. 

Walter Mitchell Stewart, Jr., appeals from the district court’s amended

judgment reimposing on remand a special condition of supervised release that

prohibits him from residing in the home or being in the company of any child

under the age of 18, with the exception of his own children, without the prior

FILED

DEC 19 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
written approval of the United States Probation Office. Stewart contends that the

condition is unreasonable because it unnecessarily interferes with his right to

associate with his children and grandchildren and delegates too much authority to

the probation officer. 

We review the district court’s imposition of a condition of supervised release

for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Wolf Child, 699 F.3d 1082, 1089 (9th

Cir. 2012). In light of Stewart’s history of sexual misconduct with underage

family members, the district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing the

condition to deter future misconduct and to protect the community, including

Stewart’s grandchildren. See id. at 1090. Further, under the circumstances of this

case, the district court did not abuse its discretion by delegating to the probation

office the implementation of this condition. See United States v. Blinkinsop, 606

F.3d 1110, 1121-22 (9th Cir. 2010). 

AFFIRMED. 

2 15-30086
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2795 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2795

To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from imposing excessive fees for 
the use of Army-controlled real property at water resources development 
 projects with respect to concessionaires operating facilities making 
restaurant, gasoline, or marine engine sales at marinas, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2013

    Mr. Collins of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from imposing excessive fees for 
the use of Army-controlled real property at water resources development 
 projects with respect to concessionaires operating facilities making 
restaurant, gasoline, or marine engine sales at marinas, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Marina Operator Tax Obligation 
Relief Act of 2013'' or the ``MOTOR Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. LEASES FOR FACILITIES MAKING RESTAURANT, GASOLINE, AND MARINE 
              ENGINE SALES AT MARINAS.

    (a) In General.--Beginning 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of the Army may not impose a fee under a lease 
entered into with a concessionaire for the use of Army-controlled real 
property (and the facilities thereon) at a water resources development 
project if--
            (1) the lease is for the operation of a facility making 
        restaurant, gasoline, or marine engine sales in connection with 
        a marina; and
            (2) the amount of the fee exceeds 1 percent of the gross 
        revenues of the facility.
    (b) Modification of Existing Leases.--The Secretary shall modify 
leases entered into before the date of enactment of this Act as 
necessary to comply with the requirements of subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00129

- CV

K

ALEB R AY R USSELL A / K / A K ALEB

R

AY S ANDERSON

, Appellant

V

.

A SHTON P AIGE W EAVER

, Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Court at

Law No. 1

of Parker County ( CIV

- 22

- 0041 )

July 7, 2022

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

JUDGMENT

This court ha s considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 240.13a-14 or
240.15d-14

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

I, Paul J. Mellett, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: January 6, 2017



/s/ Paul J. MellettPaul J. MellettChief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

STANDING ORDER REGARDING

UPDATED ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS – PATENT CASES

On November 5, 2020, the Court published its latest Order Governing Proceedings for 

Patent Cases (OGP version 3.2).1 To improve judicial efficiency, the Court ORDERS that OGP 

version 3.2 shall apply retroactively to the Markman briefing in patent cases that are at least one 

week before the filing of the opening Markman brief. 2 The parties are directed to file an 

amended proposed scheduling order based on OGP version 3.2.

SIGNED this 9th day of November, 2020.

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 Available at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/wpcontent/uploads/Standing%20Orders/Waco/Albright/Sample%20Order%20Governing%20Proce

edings%20-%20Patent%20Cases110520.pdf

2

In other words, if the deadline for the parties’ opening Markman briefs is more than a week 

after the date of this standing order, the Markman briefing shall be governed by OGP version 

3.2.

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 31 Filed 11/09/20 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP99-324-003]

Take notice that on October 5, 2000, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company (Koch) filed additional information regarding its annual cash-out report in compliance with the Commission's August 3, 2000 letter order requiring Koch to provide additional information to support the activity in the Report. 

Koch states that copies of the filing have been served upon each party designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in the above captioned proceeding. 

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before October 18, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of the filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-222 for assistance). 

David P. Boergers, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-26700  Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                               |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Frank              F.              Ferola                                                 |   |   |   |
| Frank                F. FerolaChief                Executive OfficerAugust                14, 2008 |   |   |        |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00571-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00572-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00573-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00574-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00575-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00576-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00577-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00578-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00579-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00580-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00581-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00582-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00583-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00584-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00585-ADA

JOINT MOTION TO ENTER DISPUTED SCHEDULING ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s Order to meet and confer in advance of the Rule 16 Case 

Management Conference and the Court’s Order Governing Proceedings (“OGP”), the Parties have 

reached agreement concerning the Scheduling Order on everything except for one issue

highlighted in the attached Proposed Scheduling Order is attached as Exhibit A.

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 27 Filed 10/30/20 Page 1 of 3
Date: October 30, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge 

Texas Bar No. 24059147 

Ryan S. Loveless 

Texas Bar No. 24036997 

Brett A. Mangrum 

Texas Bar No. 24065671 

Travis L. Richins 

Texas Bar No. 24061296 

Jeff Huang 

Etheridge Law Group, PLLC 

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324 

Southlake, TX 76092 

Tel.: (817) 470-7249 

Fax: (817) 887-5950 

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Jeff@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

/s/ Michael E. Jones 

Michael E. Jones (Texas Bar No. 10929400)

Patrick C. Clutter (Texas Bar No. 24036374)

Potter Minton, P.C.

110 North College, Suite 500

Tyler, Texas, 75702

+1 (903) 597-8311

+1 (903) 593-0846 facsimile

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 27 Filed 10/30/20 Page 2 of 3
mikejones@potterminton.com

patrickclutter@potterminton.com

Tharan Gregory Lanier (pro hac vice)

Jones Day

1755 Embarcadero Road

Palo Alto, California, 94303

+1 (650) 739-3939

+1 (650) 739-3900 facsimile

tglanier@jonesday.com 

Matthew S. Warren (pro hac vice)

Jen Kash (pro hac vice)

Warren Lex LLP

2261 Market Street, No. 606

San Francisco, California, 94114

+1 (415) 895-2940

+1 (415) 895-2964 facsimile

matt@warrenlex.com

jen@warrenlex.com

Attorneys for Defendant Google LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered 

electronically via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, 

on this the 30th day of October 2020.

/s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge 

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 27 Filed 10/30/20 Page 3 of 3
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Vice President of Trustee of Treasure Island Royalty Trust
pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed the accompanying annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006 of Treasure Island Royalty Trust, for which U.S. Bank National Association, acts as
trustee;2.
    
    based on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by the annual report;3.
    
    based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
the annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in the annual report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), or for causing such controls and
procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and
procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the annual
report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in the annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the
annual report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  Date:  March 26, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Steven A. FinkleaSteven A. FinkleaVice President
U.S. Bank National Association
February 4 , 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DANIEL E. SUPKINS, J R., M.D. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00018

- CV V.

THE METHODIST HOSPIT AL , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard the parties ’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on September 23, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Richard JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 25477.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 10, 1951.

Ño attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner. ■

The appeal is from a conviction of felony theft. The punishment was assessed' by the court at 2 years in the penitentiary.

The record contains an affidavit, in proper form, requesting that the court dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s request is granted. The - appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63081-63082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26966]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselors, NHLBI.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, including consideration of personnel 
qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual 
investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

[[Page 63082]]

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NHLBI.
    Date: December 7-8, 2000.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 7S235, 
9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Elizabeth G Nabel, Scientific Director for 
Clinical Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 
Division of Intramural Research, Building 10, Room 8C103, MSC 1754, 
Bethesda, MD 20892; 301/496-1518.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 13, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-26966 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                                ENERGYSOUTH, INC.


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Percent of Voting          State of
        Subsidiary                 Securities Owned         Incorporation
        ----------                 -----------------        -------------
<S>                                <C>                      <C>
Mobile Gas Service Corporation            100%                 Alabama

MGS Storage Services, Inc.                100%                 Alabama

EnergySouth Services, Inc.                100%                 Alabama

MGS Marketing Services, Inc.              100%                 Alabama
</TABLE>



                PARTNERSHIPS IN WHICH REGISTRANT OWNS AN INTEREST


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                    Partnership                          Equity Ownership
                    -----------                          ----------------
<S>                                                      <C>
Bay Gas Storage Company, Ltd.                                 87.5%(1)

Southern Gas Transmission Co.                                  51%
</TABLE>



(1)      As of September 30, 2000; as of the date hereof, equity
         ownership is 90.9%
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Terrence P. Gill, Chief Financial Officer of K-Sea General Partner GP LLC, as general partner of K-Sea
General Partner L.P., the general partner of K-Sea Transportation Partners L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:



Dated: September 13, 2010

/s/ TERRENCE P. GILLName:

Terrence P. GillTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks