alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        SEP-30-1998                  
<PERIOD-START>                           OCT-01-1997        
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1998        
<CASH>                                     1,498,549        
<SECURITIES>                               3,146,088        
<RECEIVABLES>                                971,890        
<ALLOWANCES>                                     600        
<INVENTORY>                                6,851,717        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           9,380,422        
<PP&E>                                     4,178,184        
<DEPRECIATION>                             3,180,771        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            13,523,923        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        383,314        
<BONDS>                                            0        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        385,737        
<PREFERRED>                                        0        
<COMMON>                                           0        
<OTHER-SE>                                11,925,972        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              13,523,923        
<SALES>                                    2,369,173        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           2,497,373        
<CGS>                                      1,739,652        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,739,652        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             601,414        
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 600        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,831        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              156,307        
<INCOME-TAX>                                  48,500        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          107,807        
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0        
<CHANGES>                                          0        
<NET-INCOME>                                 107,807        
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .03        
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .03        
                                                      
                                                      


</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**
 **PURSUANT
        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of YM BioSciences Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        20-F for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David G.P. Allan, Chairman and
        CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
        of
        my knowledge:
  1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  By: */s/
        David G.P. Allan*
 David
        G.P. Allan
 Chairman
        and CEO
  September
        22, 2008
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Stephan Co. (the
"Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank F. Ferola, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Frank F. Ferola
__________________________________
Frank F. Ferola
Chief Executive Officer
November 21, 2005
**Exhibit 15**

Superior Uniform Group, Inc. 

10055 Seminole Blvd. 

Seminole, FL 33772 

We have reviewed, inaccordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, asindicated in our report dated April 21, 2011; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information. 

We areaware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-105906, effectiveJune 6, 2003). 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is notconsidered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act. 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Tampa, Florida

April 21, 2011
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Cynthia McIntosh, Respondent.

Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), entered July 12, 1988, as, upon granting that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to preclude the People from offering into evidence an inculpatory statement made by her on the ground of the People’s failure to provide notice pursuant to CPL 710.30, *sua*
      *430
      *sponte,*dismissed Dutchess County indictment No. 23/88, charging her with grand larceny in the second degree, misuse of food stamps, and deliberate concealment of a material fact to obtain public assistance, on the ground of insufficient evidence.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Dutchess County, for further proceedings.

The record reveals that, after the County Court reviewed the Grand Jury minutes and found the indictment to be based on legally sufficient evidence, it granted the defendant’s motion to preclude the use of her inculpatory statement at trial due to the prosecution’s failure to provide timely notice under CPL 710.30 of its intent to offer the statement into evidence at the trial. The court then, *sua sponte,*reassessed the evidence before the Grand Jury without considering the excluded statement and, finding the evidence to be legally insufficient, dismissed the indictment pursuant to CPL 210.20 (1) (b). This was error. The defendant’s statement was prima facie competent and the indictment was supported by legally sufficient evidence presented to the Grand Jury. The court’s subsequent exclusion of the statement for purposes of the trial does not render that evidence insufficient or otherwise invalidate the indictment *(see, People v Oakley,*28 NY2d 309; *People v Kersch,*135 AD2d 570; *People v Blase,*112 AD2d 943; *People v Vega,*80 AD2d 867; *People v Mauceri,*74 AD2d 833). Moreover, the court failed to follow the proper procedure in dismissing the indictment *sua sponte (see, People v Sullivan,*142 AD2d 695; *People v Jack,*117 AD2d 753; *People v Vega, supra).*Accordingly, the indictment must be reinstated.

We do not consider the defendant’s alternative contention that dismissal of the indictment pursuant to CPL 210.20 (1) (h) is warranted since it was not advanced before the County Court. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
#### KEATON v. STATE.

No. 23766.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for aggravated assault, punishment 30 days in jail.

It was charged by complaint and information that appellant, an adult male, committed an aggravated assault upon Mrs. O. B. Anderson, a female.

Appellant was tried before the court without a jury. The evidence shows that appellant and his wife occupied a house belonging to Mrs. Anderson. On the occasion of the difficulty Mrs. Anderson and her son George had gone to the house occupied by the Keatons to insist on the latter vacating the house. The Keatons claimed Mrs. Anderson was demanding more rent. The testimony for the State shows that appellant drew his knife and made an assault with it upon George and cut him severely; that his mother went to George’s assistance and that appellant cut her with the knife several times. It was appellant’s contention, supported by his testimony and that of his wife that George began the difficulty and assaulted appellant, and that the latter was acting in self-defense against such assault, and that if he cut Mrs. Anderson it was without his knowledge and was unintentional.

The State’s evidence supports the judgment, and where a case is tried before the court his findings upon the facts are binding upon this court as would be a jury verdict if tried before a jury.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

of

Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Brian P. MacDonald, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sunoco, Inc., certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Sunoco, Inc.



|                  |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Brian P. MacDonald                           
|                  |  |  |  | Brian P. MacDonald                               
|                  |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### McKINNEY v. STATE.

No. 26003.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1952.

*212No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Under an indictment charging the primary offense of nighttime burglary of a private residence, together with two prior felony convictions, appellant was convicted and his punishment assessed at life .imprisonment in the penitentiary, under the provisions of Art. 63, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.

The record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(No. 333-58649 and No. 333-58899) on Form S-8 of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. ofour report dated January 17, 2003, except for notes 12 and 27, as to which thedate is April 14, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements ofMidwest Banc Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and forthe two years then ended, which report is incorporated by reference in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2003.
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Oak Brook, Illinois
Exhibit 12.1  Vertis, Inc. Computation
of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Deficiency
of Earnings Available to Cover Fixed Charges  (Dollars in thousands)  Years Ended December 31,2007
  
  2006
  
  2005
  
  2004
  
  2003Net Earnings
  
  $
  (326,745
  )
  $
  (26,195
  )
  $
  (173,230
  )
  $
  (11,133
  )
  $
  (95,925
  )Add:Income tax provision (benefit)
  
  388
  
  (1
  )
  (8,070
  )
  (66,053
  )
  48,436Loss (gain) from discontinued operations, net
  
  251
  
  (21,600
  )
  143,389
  
  6,210
  
  (3,577
  )Cumulative effect of accounting change
  
  
  
  
  
  1,600Amortization of previously capitalized interest
  
  941
  
  780
  
  717
  
  764
  
  571Fixed charges per (B) below
  
  144,018
  
  140,677
  
  138,449
  
  139,985
  
  135,232Deduct:Interest capitalized during period
  
  1,667
  
  1,250
  
  929
  
  798
  
  832Earnings, as adjusted (A)
  
  $
  (182,814
  )
  $
  92,411
  
  $
  101,926
  
  $
  68,975
  
  $
  83,905Fixed charges:Portion of rents representative of an interest factor
  
  $
  8,729
  
  $
  8,542
  
  $
  8,792
  
  $
  8,641
  
  $
  9,356Interest expense on all indebtedness, including amortization of debt
  expense
  
  135,289
  
  132,135
  
  129,657
  
  131,344
  
  125,876Fixed charges for
  computation purposes (B)
  
  $
  144,018
  
  $
  140,677
  
  $
  138,449
  
  $
  139,985
  
  $
  135,232Ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges (A) / (B)Deficiency of earnings
  available to cover fixed charges
  
  $
  (326,832
  )
  $
  (48,266
  )
  $
  (36,523
  )
  $
  (71,010
  )
  $
  (51,327
  )
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 277 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 277

 To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
System Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond 
       Unit RI-06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI-07 in Rhode Island.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2013

Mr. Cicilline introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
System Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond 
       Unit RI-06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI-07 in Rhode Island.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--The map subtitled ``Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, 
Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond Unit RI-06, Hazards Beach Unit RI-
07'', included in the set of maps entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal 
Barrier Resources System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal 
Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to certain John 
H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System units in Rhode Island, is 
hereby replaced by another map relating to the units entitled ``John H. 
Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, 
Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond Unit RI-06, and Hazards Beach Unit 
RI-07'' and dated September 30, 2009.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with the provisions of section 4(b) of the 
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Report of Strateco Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10K-SB/A1 for the period ending December 31, 2006, which contains the Companys financial statements audited for the year ended December 31, 2005 and audited for the year ended 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Guy Hébert, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Guy Hébert __________________ Guy Hébert President and Chief Executive Officer  June 21, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                        National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Cooperative Human Tissue Network.                    

*Date:*                        November 6, 2000.                    

*Time:*                        8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                        National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Boulevard, Conference Room J, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                        Lalita D. Palekar, Scientific Review Administrator, Special Review, Referral and Resources Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8066, Bethesda, MD 20892-7405, (301) 496-7575.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 11, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-26861  Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
exv10w47



 






Exhibit 10.47




	 	 	 
	 

	 	November 29, 2005






Mr. Philip J. Purcell

1 North Wacker Drive

Suite 4140

Chicago, IL 60606




Dear Phil:




          This will confirm the following agreement relating to the deferral of your director’s fees in
2006.



          1. All director’s fees and retainers (“Fees”) payable to you in connection with your service
on the boards of directors (including committees of such boards) of AMR Corporation and American
Airlines, Inc. for the period January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006, will be deferred and paid
to you in accordance with this letter agreement.



          2. Fees will be converted to Stock Equivalent Units in accordance with the Directors’ Stock
Equivalent Purchase Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Plan”).



          3. On the 30th business day after the date when you cease to be a
Director of AMR
Corporation, the Stock Equivalent Units accrued in 2006 pursuant to the Plan will be converted to
cash and paid to you by multiplying the number of such Stock Equivalent Units by the arithmetic
mean of the high and the low of AMR stock (“fair market value”) during the month when you ceased to
be a Director of AMR Corporation.



          4. In the event of your death, the number of Stock Equivalent Units as of your date of death
will be multiplied by the fair market value of AMR stock during the calendar month immediately
preceding your death, and the amount paid to Anne Purcell. The payment contemplated by this
paragraph 4 will be made on the 30th business day following the date of your death.



 









 





          If the foregoing is satisfactory to you, please indicate by signing one of the
originals (two are enclosed) and returning it to me.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Charles D. MarLett

Corporate Secretary	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Accepted and agreed:
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Philip J. Purcell
 


	 	 
	 	 
	Philip J. Purcell
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	12/02/2005
 


	 	 
	 	 
	Date
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 279 

To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the 

Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian tribes, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2013 

Mr. COLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to take land into 

trust for Indian tribes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY REAFFIRMED. 

4 (a) REAFFIRMATION.—Section 19 of the Act of June 

5 18, 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘Indian Reorganization 

6 Act’’; 25 U.S.C. 479), is amended— 

7 (1) in the first sentence— 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 279 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘The term’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘Effective beginning on June 18, 1934, the 

3 term’’; and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘any recognized Indian 

5 tribe now under Federal jurisdiction’’ and in6 serting ‘‘any federally recognized Indian tribe’’; 

7 and 

8 (2) by striking the third sentence and inserting 

9 the following: ‘‘In said sections, the term ‘Indian 

10 tribe’ means any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, 

11 band, nation, pueblo, village, or community that the 

12 Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an 

13 Indian tribe.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall take effect as if included in the Act of 

16 June 18, 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘Indian Reorga17 nization Act’’; 25 U.S.C. 479), on the date of enactment 

18 of that Act. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with