alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL ARMAND DELORME,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1510

[March 4, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562011CF000962 A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

CONNER, J.

Appellant, Michael Armand Delorme, appeals the denial of his motion 

to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 

3.800(b)(2). In the motion, Appellant argued that he was sentenced on a 

violation of probation based on an incorrect scoresheet. Specifically, he 

alleged that there were seventeen counts of third-degree grand theft 

erroneously listed on the scoresheet as “additional offense(s).” The State 

agrees that the trial court erred. Because Appellant completed his 

sentences for those seventeen counts of third-degree grand theft prior to 

the time he violated his probation, and therefore, those counts were not 

“pending before the court for sentencing at the time of the primary 

offense,” we agree the scoresheet was scored improperly. See § 

921.0021(1), Fla. Stat. (2011) (defining “[a]dditional offense” as “any 

offense other than the primary offense for which an offender is convicted 

and which is pending before the court for sentencing at the time of the 

primary offense” (emphasis added)); see also Sanders v. State, 35 So. 3d 

864, 866 (Fla. 2010) (“Offenses over which the trial court no longer has 
2

jurisdiction cannot be scored as additional offenses during a sentencing 

proceeding following a violation of probation because they do not fit the 

definition of ‘additional offense’ set out in section 921.0021, Florida 

Statutes (1999).”); Somps v. State, 183 So. 3d 1090, 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 

2015) (“An offense should not be scored as an additional offense following 

the revocation of a defendant’s probation if the defendant completed his 

sentence as to that offense before the VOP occurred.”). Accordingly, we 

reverse and remand for resentencing. 

Reverse and remand for resentencing.

MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 4.5

AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LOAN AGREEMENT

This Amendment to AMENDED AND RESTATED LOAN
AGREEMENT (Amendment) is made as of the May 8, 2006 and is an amendment to that certain Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, by and between WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, (Lender) whose address is 10
South Jefferson Street  VA7391, Roanoke, Virginia 24011, and SUPERIOR UNIFORM GROUP, INC.,a Florida corporation, (together with all Subsidiaries, as hereinafter defined, and all Affiliates, as hereinafter defined,
(Borrower), with its principal executive offices located at, and having a mailing address of, 10055 Seminole Boulevard, Seminole, Florida 33772 dated as of April 27, 2004 (the Agreement). All of the terms defined
in the Agreement shall have the same definition in this Amendment unless specifically stated to the contrary.

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, Borrower desires Lender to revise some of the covenants in the Agreement and Lender is willing to make such revisions as
follows:



| | 1. | Section 7.1 (d), Minimum Tangible Net Worth is hereby deleted.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Section 7.1 (e) is hereby deleted and the following inserted into its place:
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

at all times, maintain a ratio of Total Liabilities to Tangible Net Worth of not more than 0.75 to 1.00.

In all other respects, the terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending to be legally bound hereby, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by the undersigned as of the day and
year specified at the beginning hereof.



BORROWER:SUPERIOR UNIFORM GROUP, INC.,A Florida CorporationBy:Andrew D. Demott, Jr.,As a Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial OfficerLENDER:WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:Timothy J. CoopAs a Senior Vice President
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
2-74613 on Form S-16 and No. 33-66474 on Form S-8 of EnergySouth, Inc. (the
"Company"), as successor to Mobile Gas Service Corporation, and No. 333-02271 on
Form S-3 of the Company, of our report dated November 2, 2001, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2001.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
December 14, 2001
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04690**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04690\04690_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04690\04690_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04690\04690_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04690\04690_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04690\04690_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04690\04690_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04690\Supplemental Documents\04690_SCHILLER FLY ASH BLOCK DIAGRAM 11x17.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04690\Supplemental Documents\04690_WB-1 SCHILLER DIAGRAM(11x17).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04690\Supplemental Documents\04690_WB-2 SCHILLER BLOCK DIAGRAM(11x17).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04690\Supplemental Documents\MAP-1 Schiller Station Facility Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04690\04690_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04690\04690_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 04690\Supplemental Documents\04690_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26790]



[[Page 62755]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration

[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2000-49; Exemption Application Nos. 
D-10879]


Actuarial Sciences Associates, Inc. (ASA) and ASA Fiduciary 
Counselors Inc. (ASA) Counselors), Located in Alexandria, VA

AGENCY: Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, U.S. Department of 
Labor (the Department).

ACTION: Notice of Technical Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On October 11, 2000, the Department published in the Federal 
Register (65 FR 60454) an individual exemption which permits a 
transaction between a party in interest with respect to the Plumbers 
and Pipe Fitters National Pension Fund (the Fund) and an account that 
holds certain assets of the Fund managed by ASA or ASA Counselors, 
while serving as independent named fiduciary in connection with 
Prohibited Transaction Exemption 99-46 (64 FR 61944, November 15, 
1999).
    On page 60454 of the grant notice, the Prohibited Transaction 
Exemption (PTE) number was erroneously listed as 2000-47. The PTE 
number for this exemption is 2000-49. Therefore, the Department hereby 
corrects such error by designating the exemption as PTE 2000-49.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Angelena LeBlanc of the Department 
at (202) 219-8883. (This is not a toll-free number.)

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 13th day of October, 2000.
Ivan L. Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations, Pension and Welfare Benefits 
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 00-26790 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
**Exhibit 23.2**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors

Hoku Scientific, Inc. 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333 - 127966) on Form S-8 of Hoku Scientific, Inc. of our report dated April 18, 2005 except as to the first paragraph of note 5, which is as of July 2, 2005 andthe second paragraph of note 7(b) and the sixth paragraph of note 7(d), which are as of July 12, 2005, with respect to the balance sheet of Hoku Scientific, Inc. as of March 31, 2005, and the related statements of operations,stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended March 31, 2005, which report appears in the March 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Hoku Scientific, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Honolulu, Hawaii 

June 27, 2006
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1129

___________

Bluett Reginald Cameron, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* District of Minnesota.

United States of America, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: October 23, 1997

Filed: July 1, 1998

___________

Before MCMILLIAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Bluett Reginald Cameron pleaded guilty in 1992 to cocaine distribution and

unlawful use of a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime, and received

consecutive sentences of 121 and 60 months' imprisonment for the respective offenses.

He now brings a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, seeking to vacate his sentence on the

firearm conviction, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Bailey v. United States,

116 S. Ct. 501 (1995). The district court denied his petition for relief, and Cameron
This case has been considered by the panel under the terms of Eighth Circuit

1

Rule 47E.

-2-

appeals. Because of the Supreme Court's decision in Bousley v. United States, 118 S.

Ct. 1604 (1998), we reverse and remand to the district court for further consideration.1

A true copy.

 ATTEST:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
JASON HUNT

1825 pinnacle point, Holts Summit Mo 65043 | 573-521-

7154 | jhunt@freshideasfood.com

SUMMARY

To obtain certified waiver under section 333 for use of UAS for commercial business 

purposes. 

USES

Primary 

· Real Estate Videography under 100 feet

· Real Estate Photography under 500 feet

· Event Videography under 300 feet 

· Event Photography under 300 feet

· Ariel Photography under 500 feet 

· Agriculture Surveying 

UAS System/Software

· DjI Phantom 3 advanced 

· DjI Inspire 

Our rural area has a great demand for the business aspect. Small businesses in my, and surrounding 

communities would benefit greatly from the marketing and business expansion alone. I will greatly appreciate 

the opportunity to be one of the first in my area to bring this to the customers that want it. 

Thank You for your consideration.

Jason Hunt 

1825 Pinnacle point 

Holts Summit, MO 65043

573-521-7154

Jhunt@freshideasfood.com
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT


The Board of Directors
American Honda Finance Corporation

Members of the Board:

We have examined management's assertion about American Honda Finance
Corporation's (the Company's) compliance with the minimum servicing standards
set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, as they relate to the servicing of
retail automobile loan contracts, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2003
included in the accompanying management's assertion. The minimum servicing
standards not considered by the Company to be applicable to the servicing of
retail automobile loans include procedures 2, 3 and 4 of section I - Custodial
Bank Accounts, procedures 1, 2, 3 and 4 of section III - Disbursements and
procedures 2, 3 and 4 of section V - Mortgage Loan Accounting. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, including
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

Our examination disclosed the following material noncompliance with insurance
requirements applicable to the Company as of and for the year ended March 31,
2003. The Company was not in compliance with minimum servicing standards for
maintaining an errors and omissions policy effective during the year ended March
31, 2003.

In our opinion, except for the material noncompliance described in the third
paragraph, American Honda Finance Corporation has complied, in all material
respects, with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended March 31, 2003.


/s/ KPMG LLP


September 25, 2003
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


September 28, 2021


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2089


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, NY 10286


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2089 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined the Registration
Statement File No. 333-257064 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references
to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	 /s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
(LOGO) DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Suite 1200
695 Town Center Drive
Costa Mesa, California 92626-1924
Telephone: (714) 436-71O0 Facsimile: (714) 436-7200


INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

To LIFE Financial Corporation:

We have  examined  management's  assertion  about LIFE  Financial  Corporation's
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE
BANKERS (USAP) as of, and for the year ended, December 31, 1997, included in the
accompanying management assertion.  Management is responsible for LIFE Financial
Corporation's   compliance   with  those  minimum   servicing   standards.   Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion  on  management's  assertion  about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence  about  LIFE  Financial  Corporation's
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our examination does
not provide a legal  determination  on LIFE Financial  Corporation's  compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion,  management's assertion that LIFE Financial Corporation complied
with the  aforementioned  minimum  servicing  standards  as of, and for the year
ended, December 31, 1997 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/S/Deloitte & Touche LLP
February 27, 1998
Exhibit 31.1
               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I, Joel Williams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Monarch Staffing,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.  The small business issuers other certifying officer and I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2007           /s/ Joel Williams
                              ---------------------------------------
                                  Joel Williams
                                  Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 3.1
 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
ACCESS NATIONAL CORPORATION
 I. NAME
  II. PURPOSE
  III. CAPITAL STOCK
 Section 1
 Section 2
 Section 3
 Section 4
 IV. NO PREEMPTIVE RIGHTS
  V. DIRECTORS
 Section 1
 Section 2




---



##### 



Class I
    
    Class II
    
    Class IIIServing until 2003
    
    Serving until 2004
    
    Serving until 2005Michael W. Clarke
    
    Robert C. Shoemaker
    
    Jacques RebiboJames L. Jadlos
    
    Thomas M. Kody
    
    John W. EdgemondJ. Randolph Babbitt
 Section 3
 Section 4
 VI. LIMIT ON LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION
 Section 1
 Section 2
 Section 3
 Section 4
 Section 5 .
 Section 6




---



##### 



Section 7
 VII. INITIAL REGISTERED OFFICE AND AGENT
 rd
  /s/ Jacob A. Lutz III




---



##### 



Access National Corporation
 ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT OF ACCESS NATIONAL CORPORATION
  ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
 th from
 st
 th
 /s/ Michael W. Clarke
    
    Date: 11/25/03Michael W. ClarkePresident & CEO703-871-2100Certified By:/s/ Robert C. ShoemakerRobert C. ShoemakerSecretaryAccess National Corporation




---



##### 



Access National Corporation
 ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
     /s/ Michael W. Clarke
    
    Date: 11/29/2005Michael W. ClarkePresident, CEOAccess National CorporationCertified By:/s/ Sheila M. LintonSheila M. LintonSecretaryAccess National Corporation
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00365-CV

WELLINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY and Richard Barkkume,

Appellants

v.

Victor BANUELOS,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CVF001922D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

REVERSED and judgment is RENDERED granting the motion for summary judgment filed by 

appellants Wellington Insurance Company and Richard Barkkume. Costs of the appeal are taxed 

against appellee Victor Banuelos.

SIGNED January 31, 2018.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Exhibit
10.18


 


Explanatory
Note: This document has been translated from the Chinese-language original for reference purposes only. While this English translation
is believed to be generally accurate, it is subject to, and qualified by, in its entirety, the Chinese-language original. Such Chinese-language
original shall be the controlling document for all purposes.


 


Purchase
Advance Payment Contract


 


Party
A (payer): Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party
B (Payee): Yuhuan Wang


 


Party
B is Party A’s raw material supplier. In order to reduce operating costs and enhance the partnership between the two parties, Party
A agrees to prepay certain prices for the purchase of corresponding raw materials for Party B’s obligation to provide Party A with
Camellia seeds. After full negotiation by both parties, the following contracts have been concluded:


 


1.
Purpose of advance payment: Party B can only use the advance payment paid by Party A to purchase camellia seed raw materials, and shall
not use it for other purposes.


 


2.
Prepaid amount: RMB 8,000,000


 


3.
As Party B’s business scope also involves Camellia seed oil, Party A may also provide Party B with Camellia seed oil of the same
value as the advance payment to offset the advance payment. The price of Camellia seed oil shall be in accordance with Party A’s
regulations.


 


4.
Repayment method: Party B will deduct the advance payment in the form of Camellia seeds or equivalent currency to Party A. The repayment
period shall not exceed twelve months per year, and special circumstances shall be negotiated separately.


 


5.
Party B promises to provide Party A with Camellia Seeds at a price that is 2% lower than the actual price of Camellia Seeds on the actual
delivery date. After the prepayment is deducted, the settlement will be based on the actual market price.


 


6.
If Party B fails to use the advance payment as required by the agreement, Party A has the right to recover the advance payment and impose
a penalty interest of three thousandths per day for the breached part.


 


7.
For matters not covered, the two parties can negotiate and conclude a supplementary contract. The supplementary contract has the same
legal effect as this contract. Any party who fails to negotiate can bring a lawsuit to the people’s court in China.


 


8.
This contract is valid for one year, and it will automatically terminate when it expires.


 


9.
This contract has two copies, with each party holding one copy, and it will take effect from the date of signing.


 


/s/
Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party
A: Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Date:
May 19, 2020


 


/s/
Yuhuan Wang


Party
B: Yuhuan Wang


Date:
May 19, 2020