alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 23, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127129 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices v SC: 127129 

 COA: 245835 

Macomb CC: 2002-001210-FH 

GENNARO JOSEPH PISCOPO,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of April 7, 2005, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2004 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v 

Jackson (Docket No. 125250). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on 

February 9, 2007, 477 Mich 1019 (2007), the application is again considered, and it is 

GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the 

rape-shield statute, MCL 750.520j, bars the admission of evidence of past sexual assault; 

(2) whether the rape-shield statute bars the admission of evidence of imaginary sexual 

activity; (3) whether the rape-shield statute bars the admission of unsubstantiated 

allegations of prior sexual assault; (4) what procedures and standards a trial court should 

employ to determine whether the rape-shield statute applies to otherwise admissible 

evidence involving unsubstantiated allegations of sexual assault or evidence of imaginary 

sexual activity; (5) what party has the burden of proof at each stage of the process of 

determining the applicability of the rape-shield statute; (6) whether barring the admission 

of evidence of actual past sexual assault in this case would constitute a denial of the 

constitutional right to confrontation or the right to present a defense; and (7) whether the 

trial court erred in barring the admission of evidence regarding the questionnaire filled 

out by the complainant prior to the church ritual. 

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys 

Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups 

interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court 

for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. 

t0516 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 23, 2007 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 200 (Monday, October 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26492]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Advisory Committee Meeting Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC).

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-9463), announcement is made of the following 
meeting:
    Name of Committee: Distance Learning/Training Technology 
Subcommittee of the Army Education Advisory Committee.
    Date: 1-2 November 2000.
    Place: Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA) Alexandria, Virginia.
    Time: 0800-1630 on 1 November 2000; 0800-1400 on 2 November 2000.
    Proposed Agenda: Discussions will Include: The Army University 
Access Online Program and Distance Learning, how the two programs are 
mutually supportive; the National Guard and Distance Learning; Army 
Research Institute (ARI), recent results on the long term effectiveness 
of DL and plans for collaborative learning in online training 
environments; Update on the status of the development and delivery of a 
learning (student) management system to support DL.
    Purpose of the Meeting: The members will advise the Assistant 
Deputy Chief of Staff (ADCST), HQ Training and Doctrine Command 
(TRADOC), on matters pertaining to education and training technologies.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: All communications regarding this 
subcommittee should be addressed to Mr. Richard Karpinski, at 
Commander, Headquarters TRADOC, ATTN: ATTG-CF (Mr. Karpinski), Fort 
Monroe, VA 23651-5000; telephone number (757) 728-5531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meeting of the advisory committee is open to 
the public. Because of restricted meeting space, attendance will be 
limited to those persons who have notified the Advisory Committee 
Management Office in writing at least five days prior to the meeting of 
their intention to attend. Contact Mr. Karpinski (757-728-5531) for 
meeting agenda and specific locations.
    Any member of the public may file a written statement with the 
committee before, during, or after the meeting. To the extent that time 
permits, the committee chairman may allow public presentations or oral 
statements at the meeting.

Robert E. Seger,
Senior Executive Service, Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff for Training.
[FR Doc. 00-26492 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

. . AUSTIN 

GROVER SELLERS 

Al-roRNEr OCNERIL 

tsrioreble i&rry i&;~ge Srozier 

Cualmwn axld Exeoutive Director 

'Texss Unemployment Colnpensatiqn Co~~~nission 

Brown Building 

Au8tin, Texas 

Dear Sir: Opinion 240. O-7503 

on ttke two que 

191 of tne Dopartmultaf 

th LegielRture apply to 

he Taxa Unemployment 

ither the husband or the 

6 employed by another 

erntmnt of Texas? 

vember 16, 1946, the United State8 

rioti till be returned to the State 

d will booom a part of the organimTexas Unemploymukt G~pSnaatiOn Corninission. Xi11 the above referred to seation of 

the Wpartmental ApWopriatiori Bill apply to 

tiioae persons now employed by the Unfted States 

Smployment %rvica when that merger is completed? 
308
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Michael Benstock     
|Michael Benstock         
|Chief Executive Officer  
|                         
|/s/ Andrew D. Demott, Jr.
|Andrew D. Demott, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer  

Date: July 24, 2009
EXHIBIT 23**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 2-74613 on Form S-16and No. 33-66474 on Form S-8 of EnergySouth, Inc. (the “Company”), as successor to Mobile GasService Corporation, No. 333-02271 on Form S-3, and No. 333-103713 on Form S-8 of the Company, ofour reports dated December 13, 2007, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Companyfor the year ended September 30, 2007.     /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP         DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP    Atlanta, Georgia    December 13, 2007
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2795 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from imposing excessive fees for 

the use of Army-controlled real property at water resources development 

projects with respect to concessionaires operating facilities making restaurant, gasoline, or marine engine sales at marinas, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2013 

Mr. COLLINS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from imposing excessive fees for the use of Army-controlled real property 

at water resources development projects with respect to 

concessionaires operating facilities making restaurant, 

gasoline, or marine engine sales at marinas, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Marina Operator Tax 

5 Obligation Relief Act of 2013’’ or the ‘‘MOTOR Act of 

6 2013’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2795 IH

1 SEC. 2. LEASES FOR FACILITIES MAKING RESTAURANT, 

2 GASOLINE, AND MARINE ENGINE SALES AT 

3 MARINAS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning 1 year after the date 

5 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army may 

6 not impose a fee under a lease entered into with a conces7 sionaire for the use of Army-controlled real property (and 

8 the facilities thereon) at a water resources development 

9 project if— 

10 (1) the lease is for the operation of a facility 

11 making restaurant, gasoline, or marine engine sales 

12 in connection with a marina; and 

13 (2) the amount of the fee exceeds 1 percent of 

14 the gross revenues of the facility. 

15 (b) MODIFICATION OF EXISTING LEASES.—The Sec16 retary shall modify leases entered into before the date of 

17 enactment of this Act as necessary to comply with the re18 quirements of subsection (a). 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Restaurant Training Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Hume, Treasurer, Secretary and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
29th day of March, 2004.



/s/ Michael Hume
-------------------------------
Michael Hume
Treasurer, Secretary and Director
Restaurant Training Corporation
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5666 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5666

       To suspend temporarily the duty on Topramezone technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on Topramezone technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TOPRAMEZONE TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        [3-4,5-dihydro-     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          isoxazol-3-yl)-4-                                                 12/31/2015
                          methylsulfonyl-2-
                          methylphenyl](5-
                          hydroxy-1-methyl-
                          1H-pyrazole-4-
                          yl)methanone
                          (Topramezone
                          technical) (CAS
                          No. 210631-68-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2934.99.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.3




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS




We refer to our report entitled "Report on Reserves Data by Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor" dated March 18, 2010 evaluating the reserves attributable to Canadian Superior Energy Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2009 (the "Report").




We hereby consent to references to our name and to the Report in the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We also confirm that we have read the Annual Information Form included in the Annual Report on Form 40-F and that we have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained in it that are derived from the Report or that are within our knowledge as a result of the services we performed in connection with the Report.






Yours truly,GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD./s/ John H. Stilling, P. Eng.Vice–President




Calgary, Alberta, Canada


March 29, 2010
#### Ex parte ALLEN et al.

No. 23190.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 28, 1945.

Joseph F. Greathouse, of Fort Worth, for appellants.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Relators were taken into custody on the charge that they were affected with a venereal disease.

A writ of habeas corpus was secured and upon a hearing relators were remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Tarrant County, from which order relators appealed.

It now appears from an affidavit on file that since this appeal was perfected relators have been discharged and are no longer in custody. A motion by our State’s Attorney calls attention to said affidavit which renders moot the question presented, and prays that under the circumstances the appeal be dismissed.

The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
SJV Interpollutant calculations.xls2009 IPTCountyIP RatioGeologic andConstructionTire and BrakeWear Vegetative BurningAmmoniumNitrateincludingassociatedwaterAmmoniumSulfateincludingassociatedwaterMarine UnassignedKern0.2553 0.6945 3.3798 0.1964 1.3031 0.02890.1130 0.0244Nitrate 2.6285530.0747 0.4425Sulfate 0.443886Fresno0.1786 1.2520 2.4050 0.3293 0.9292 0.01660.1796 0.0528Nitrate 2.5092260.1312 0.5134Sulfate 0.641428Kings0 19291 07051 41780 33920 89470 0228Organic CarbonPrimary SecondaryMobile ExhaustPrimary SecondaryNumbers represent the amount of observed particulate per ton of emissions for the various categories of emissions.Interpollutant ratio is the comparison of organic carbon primary particulate (from industrial emissions) to nitrate or sulfate.Interpollutant RatioProjected to 20090.19291.07051.41780.33920.89470.02280.1367 0.0401Nitrate 2.233480.1519 0.5363Sulfate 0.63257Tulare0.1969 1.9999 2.5945 0.3364 0.9261 0.02320.2086 0.0387Nitrate 2.244130.1499 0.4171Sulfate 0.806442
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2682]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

DATE AND TIME:  Tuesday, February 29, 2000 at 2:00 P.M. (Eastern Time). 
(This Meeting was rescheduled from Tuesday, January 25, 2000)

PLACE:  Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of the EEOC Office Building, 
1801 ``L'' Street, NW, Washington, DC 20507.

STATUS:  The meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   

Closed Session

    Review of Pending Litigation.


    Note: Any matter not discussed or concluded may be carried over 
to a later meeting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC 
Commission meetings in the Federal Register, the Commission also 
provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future 
Commission sessions). Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and 
(202) 663-4074 (TTD) at any time for information on these meetings.


CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:  Frances M. Hart, Executive 
Officer on (202) 663-4070.

    Dated: February 2, 2000.
Frances M. Hart,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 00-2682 Filed 2-2-00; 1:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 6750-06-M
July 23 , 2015

M r. Brian Morson

12135 Sand Pebble Way

Orlando, FL 32824

Dear Mr. Mrson :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your May 21

, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-

1766 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, h ow it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional i nformation, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any ques tions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany N ewton

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Mark W. Blodgett, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StockerYale, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 14, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark W. Blodgett                 
|Mark W. Blodgett                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
<Page>

                                                                       Exhibit 5

KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants
1200 205 - 5th Avenue SW
Calgary AB T2P 4B9



                   ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
CANADIAN SUPERIOR ENERGY INC.

We consent to the use of our report dated May 10, 2004, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of Canadian Superior Energy Inc. as at December
31, 2003, and the consolidated statements of operations and retained earnings
(deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended and our report dated May 19,
2004 on the related supplemental note entitled "Reconciliation of United
States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles", included in this annual
report on Form 40-F.

/S/ KPMG LLP

Calgary, Canada
May 19, 2004
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code), I, John J. Nicola, Chief Financial Officer ofK-Sea General Partner GP LLC, as general partner of K-Sea General Partner L.P.,the general partner of K-Sea Transportation Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”),hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)         The Partnership’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|                                | /s/ JOHN J.  NICOLA |
|--------------------------------|---------------------|
| Dated: September 13, 2005 | Name:               | John J. Nicola |
|                           | Title:              | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----