alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Robert Y. Newell, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cardica, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:September 14, 2006 /s/ Robert Y. Newell     Robert Y. Newell    Vice President, Finance & Operations and ChiefFinancial Officer    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
P.1 

OAR Box 1796 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

50) VI-B-1 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:37 PM Sheet 50 of 107 
-P_2 

A-90-37 

VI-B-1 

This document has been moved to IV-B-02 at the request of the project officer. It was 

incorrectly categorized originally. 

NOV t 81999 

EPAMROOCKft
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANTHONY BRUNSON

, Appellant,

v.

HOWARD FOULKE

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2964

[ April 25, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; David Haimes , Judge; L.T. Case No. 14

- 016607 (08)

.

Anthony Brunson, Madison, pro se.

Alyssa M. Reiter and Lindsey A. Hicks of Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy

& Ford, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6315

DEWEY KEITH VENABLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; GENE JOHNSON, V.D.O.C. Regional Director; PAGE TRUE, Warden; B. TRENT, Assistant Warden; B. CABELL, Assistant Warden; VILLARS, Counselor; MIXCELL, Counsel; LIPES, C/O; L. RIDDICK, C/O; CRENSHAW, C/O; RIDDICK, Sgt. (Currently a Lieutenant), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:05-cv-00821-JRS) Submitted: August 13, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007 Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dewey Keith Venable, Appellant Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Dewey Keith Venable appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Venable v. Dep’t of Corr. , No. 3:05-cv-00821-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### ADCOCK v. STATE.

No. 22141.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 20, 1942.

Alex P. Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for- the unlawful sale of liquor in a dry area. The penalty assessed is a fine of $100.

The complaint and information appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Hence nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
# AGENCY:

 Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

 Notice; Southwest Resource Advisory Council Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

 Notice is hereby given that the Southwest Resource Advisory Council (Southwest RAC) will meet in March, 2000 in Paonia, CO.

# DATES:

 The meeting will be held on Thursday, March 9, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

 For additional information, contact Roger Alexander, Bureau of Land Management, Southwest Center, 2465 South Townsend Avenue, Montrose, CO 81401; phone 970-240-5335; TDD 970-240-5366; e-mail Roger_Alexander@co.blm.gov.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 The March 9, 2000 meeting will be held at the Paonia Senior Citizens Center, 106 Third Street, Paonia CO. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and end no later than 4:30 p.m. The agenda will include updates on the North Fork Coal Leasing EIS, the Gunnison Gorge and Anasazi Heritage Center recreation fee demonstration projects, the proposed recreation fee for Yankee Boy Basin, Colorado's RACs' proposed recreation guidelines and the Anasazi Area of Critical Environmental Concern. A presentation on the Delta-Montrose Public Lands Partnership proposed Uncompahgre Plateau project is also scheduled. General public comment is scheduled for 9:15 a.m.

Summary minutes for Council meetings are maintained in the Southwest Center Office and on the World Wide Web at http://www.co.blm.gov/​mdo/​mdo_​sw_​rac.htm and are available for public inspection and reproduction within thirty (30) days following each meeting.

Dated: January 31, 2000.

Roger Alexander,

Public Affairs Specialist.

[FR Doc. 00-2685 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Dennis OBrien, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Silver Mines, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-a5(f)) for the Registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within this entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 14, 2009

By:    /s/ Dennis OBrien



Dennis OBrien, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer



---
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAR 8 2001

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DARIAN LEE HOLTSMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-5053

(D.C. No. 99-CR-127-C)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO, ANDERSON , and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

Defendant Holtsman pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d). The district court, after denying his 

motion for downward departure, found that the defendant had a total offense
-2-

level of twenty-seven and a criminal history category of I, giving a sentencing

range of seventy to eighty-seven months. The defendant was sentenced to eighty

seven months imprisonment followed by five year of supervised release, and

ordered to pay $2,911.80 in restitution.

Counsel for the defendant has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and has requested leave to withdraw. Counsel’s

brief acknowledges that “[t]here are no facts to support an argument by Mr.

Holtsman that the district court failed to depart because it erroneously interpreted

the guidelines as depriving it of the power to depart based on the proffered

circumstances.” Id. at 5. 

Upon the filing of counsel’s Anders brief, the defendant was given an

opportunity to respond. He failed to do so.

It is well settled that "[a]bsent the trial court's clear misunderstanding of its

discretion to depart, or its imposition of a sentence which violates the law or

incorrectly applies the guidelines, we have no jurisdiction to review a refusal to

depart." United States v. Coddington, 118 F.3d 1439, 1441 (10th Cir. 1997)

(citations omitted). After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief,

the court finds that the district court properly applied the guidelines and

understood its authority when it denied the defendant’s motion for a downward

departure. Therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the discretionary
-3-

decision of the district court not to depart from the guidelines.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. The motion by counsel for the

defendant to withdraw is GRANTED. The mandate will issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Stephen H. Anderson 

Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Bo
Chen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report
on Form 10-K/A of Bodisen Biotech, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Bodisen Biotech,
Inc.




Dated:
      September 15, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Bo ChenBo
      ChenChief
      Executive Officer





I, Junyan
Tong certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report
on Form 10-K/A of Bodisen Biotech, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Bodisen Biotech,
Inc.




Dated:
      September 15, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Junyan TongJunyan
      TongChief
      Financial Officer
NO. 12-13-00386-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AT TYLER, TEXAS

WILLIE OWENS III., Appellant
V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

ON APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. 2013-0215 IN THE 159TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

STATE’S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION (UNOPPOSED)

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THIS COURT: Appellee, State of Texas, moves for a 7-day extension of time to file its
brief.
I. Under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the general deadline to file an appellee’s brief is 30 days after the date the appellant’s brief was filed. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(b). In this matter, Appellant filed a brief on December 15, 2014. The State’s brief was due Wednesday January 14, 2015. ACCEPTED 12-13-00386-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 1/14/2015 4:09:07 PM CATHY LUSK CLERKThe State of Texas now requests a 7-day extension of time in which to file

its brief.
II. Good cause exists for allowing the State additional time to file its brief for the following reasons:
1. Counsel for the State was preparing for a jury tria l in State v. Hernandez , Cause No.: 2014-0629 which was scheduled for jury selection on January 12, 2015.
2. Counsel for the State is simultaneously working on briefs in Willie Owens III. V. State of Texas , No.: 12-13-00386-CR, Joshe Johnson v. State of
Texas , No.: 12-14-00160-CR, Joseph Finley v. State of Texas , No.: 12-14-00005- CR, and Jock Dominey v. State of Texas , No.: 12-14-00226-CR, as well as handling a full felony caseload.
3. This motion for a 7 day extension is unopposed by a ppellant.
III. From the above-listed reasons, the State has demon strated that good cause for the failure to be able to submit its brief by t he Court’s deadline. This is the State’s second motion for extension, and it is not brought for purposes of delay or harassment, but to see that justice is done.WHEREFORE, Appellee State of Texas prays that the C ourt grant its

requested 7-day extension to file its State’s Brief in this matter and order that the response filed on October 10, 2013 be deemed filed. Respectfully Submitted,
____/s/April Ayers-Perez______ APRIL AYERS-PEREZ Assistant District Attorney Angelina County D.A.’s Office P.O. Box 908 Lufkin, Texas 75902 (936) 632-5090 phone (936) 637-2818 fax State Bar No. 24090975
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE STATE OF TEXASCertificate of Service

I do certify that on January 14, 2105, a true and correct copy of the above document has been served electronically to appellan t’s counsel, Albert Charanza, Jr., via e-filing.
___/s/April Ayers-Perez__________ APRIL AYERS-PEREZ

Certificate of Conference I do certify that on January 14, 2015, counsel for state conferred with Albert Charanza, Jr., counsel for appellant, via the telep hone and he was unopposed to this motion.
_/s/April Ayers-Perez____________ APRIL AYERS-PEREZ
Certificate of Compliance I certify that this document contains 289 words, c ounting all parts of the document except those excluded by Tex. R. App. P. 9 .4(i)(1). The body text is in 14 point font, and the footnote text is in 12 point font.
_/s/April Ayers-Perez_____________ APRIL AYERS-PEREZ
Order entered January 28, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00306-CR

KAREN PATRICIA BOWIE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-81418-2011

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On January 6, 2014, we granted the motion of William L. Schultz to withdraw as counsel 

and ordered the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in the appeal. We have 

received the trial court’s order appointing Jessie R. Allen as appellant’s new attorney. We 

DIRECT the Clerk to add Jessie R. Allen as appellant’s appointed attorney of record.

We ORDER appellant to file her brief by MARCH 14, 2014.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 

counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

J OSE L. SILVA

- SMITH AND

JONATHAN G. SILVA

- SMITH

,

Appellant s,

v.

DARLENE E. SMITH,

Appellee. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 22

- 00 088

- C V

Appeal from the

205 th District C ourt

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 201 9

- DCV

- 4636 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Appell ants’ attorney, Stephen G. Peters , to

withdraw as counsel. T he Appell ants have not filed an objection with the Court. The motion is

GRANTED. The Appellants’ brief i s due to be filed on August 29, 2022

. The Court requests that

Appell ants notify the Court immediately if they retain appellate counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27 th day of Ju ly , 20 22

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley

, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         341,343
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,497,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                    46,212
<INVENTORY>                                  1,196,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,073,341
<PP&E>                                       2,516,411
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,268,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,321,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          970,636
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,063,149
<COMMON>                                     3,202,685
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,321,735
<SALES>                                      5,094,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,094,842
<CGS>                                        2,506,798
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,506,798
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,278,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,808
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                231,250
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            231,250
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   231,250
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit12**

Dated: June 26, 2006

 

I, David Balai, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and allreports on Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed inrespect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, ofPermanent Financing (No. 2) PLC, Permanent Funding (No. 1)Limited and Permanent Mortgages Trustee Limited;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as awhole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as o thelast day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing informationrequired to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling andservicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these repots is included inthese reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and upon representations made to me by theservicer, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilledits obligations under the servicing agreement; and

 

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to theservicer’s compliance with the minimum servicing standards based uponrepresentations made to me by the servicer.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties;Halifax plc.

 

Date: June 26, 2006

 

By:  /s/ DavidBalai       

Title: Director,Permanent Funding (No. 1) Limited

----