alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Frank F. Ferola, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of The
Stephan Co.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter

                                     1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (continued)


(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 21, 2007

/s/ Frank F. Ferola
__________________________________
Frank F. Ferola
Chief Executive Officer













                                     2
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




The Manager and Member
DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-73570) on Form S-3 of CARCO Auto Loan Master Trust (the "Trust") of our
report dated March 20, 2003, relating to the statement of assets, liabilities
and equity arising from cash transactions of DaimlerChrysler Master Owner Trust
as of December 31, 2002 and the related statement of cash receipts and
disbursements for the period June 1, 2002 (inception) through December 31, 2002,
which report appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of the
Trust.

Our report dated March 20, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph stating that
the financial statements were prepared on the basis of cash receipts and
disbursements, which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



/s/  KPMG LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 28, 2003
#### GRADY v. STATE.

No. 25911.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 22, 1952.

Marvin H. Miller, New Boston, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for assault with intent to murder, the punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

Under a charge submitting assault with intent to murder with and without malice, and aggravated assault, the jury returned the following verdict:

> “We the jury find the defendant guilty of assault with intent to murder and assess his punishment at confinement in the State penitentiary for two' years.”

The verdict is assailed as being indefinite and uncertain in that it cannot be ascertained therefrom whether the conviction was for the offense of assault with intent to murder with or without malice, thereby rendering impossible an application of the indeterminate *sentence*law.

The authorities of Brooks v. State, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 98, 178 S.W.2d 865, and Jordan v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 238, 144 S.W.2d 274, which are cited by appellant, and Harrell v. State, 153 Tex.Cr.R. 141, 218 S.W.2d 466, sustain his contention. However, in the case of Ex parte Byrd, Tex.Cr.App., 251 S.W.2d 537, 538, the doctrine upon-which the Harrell, Brooks, and Jordan cases rested — that is, that assault with intent to murder with malice and assault with intent to murder without malice are separate and distinct offenses — was expressly overruled. Therefore, the cases mentioned and all -others were overruled in so far as they may be inconsistent with that holding.

It is apparent, then, under the holding in the Byrd case, that the verdict here is not vague or indefinite. Accordingly, the sentence is reformed so as to read “not less than one nor more than two years” in the penitentiary.

*200Where the jury’s verdict is silent on the question of malice, -we will construe such verdict as a finding of guilty of assault with intent to murder without malice, if the punishment is less than three years.

As so reformed, the conviction is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
#### Daviro Corporation, Respondent, v Aras Corporation, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order granting plaintiff summary judgment on its claim for $63,357 in compensatory damages. The court did not grant summary judgment on any of the theories expressly pleaded, but read the complaint as stating a claim for goods sold and delivered and granted plaintiff summary judgment on that theory. The court’s analysis and resolution of the case were proper. In support of its motion, plaintiff made an evidentiary showing that defendant ordered the goods from plaintiff’s principal, that defendant took possession of them, that defendant did not pay for the goods, and that plaintiff was consequently charged for the goods on its own account. Defendant failed to rebut plaintiff’s evidentiary showing, and in essence conceded that it was obligated to pay for the goods. We thus adopt the court’s analysis interpreting plaintiff’s complaint as stating a contract claim and granting summary judgment on that basis. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, Christ, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. PR00-9-000]

                    Take notice that a Staff Panel shall be convened in accordance with the Commission order [1]                                          in the above-captioned docket to allow opportunity for written comments and for the oral presentation of views, data, and arguments regarding the fair and equitable rates to be established for transportation service under section 311 of the Natural Policy Act of 1978 on PG&E Texas Pipeline, L.P.'s system. The Staff Panel will not be a judicial or evidentiary-type hearing and there will be no cross-examination of persons presenting statements. Members participating on the Staff Panel before whom the presentations are made may ask questions. If time permits, Staff Panel members may also ask such relevant questions as are submitted to them by participants. Other procedural rules relating to the panel will be announced at the time the proceeding commences.                

                    The Staff Panel will be held on Friday, October 13, 2000, at 10 a.m. in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory                           ( print page 60928)                        Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             See PG&E Texas Pipeline, L.P., 93 FERC ¶ 61,012 (2000).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-26286  Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.'1350

Solely for the purposes of
complying with 18 U.S.C.'1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Michael Benstock     
|Michael Benstock         
|Chief Executive Officer  
|                         
|/s/ Andrew D. Demott, Jr.
|Andrew D. Demott, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer  
|                         
|Date: August 3, 2006
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of The Stephan Co. (the "Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank F. Ferola, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Frank F. FerolaFrank
      F. FerolaChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      18, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 200 (Monday, October 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT-020-1010-AA]


Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Montana, Billings and Miles 
City Field Offices, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Eastern Montana Resource Advisory Council will have a 
meeting on November 16 at the Hampton Inn Conference Room, 5110 
Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana starting at 8 a.m. Primary agenda 
topics include updates on coalbed methane development, Pompeys Pillar, 
Weatherman Draw, continued discussion on access, and an update on the 
fire season.
    The meeting is open to the public and the public comment period is 
set for 11 a.m. The public may make oral statements before the Council 
or file written statements for the Council to consider. Depending on 
the number of persons wishing to make an oral statement, a per person 
time limit may be established. Summary minutes of the meeting will be 
available for public inspection and copying during regular business 
hours.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn Krause, Public Affairs 
Specialist, Miles City Field Office, 111 Garryowen Road, Miles City, 
Montana 59301, telephone (406) 233-2831.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Council is to advise the 
Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning 
and management issues associated with public land management. The 15 
member Council includes individuals who have expertise, education, 
training or practical experience in the planning and management of 
public lands and their resources and who have a knowledge of the 
geographical jurisdiction of the Council.

    Dated: October 4, 2000.
Aden L. Seidlitz,
Associate Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-26424 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
Exhibit 10.13


 


Explanatory
Note: This document has been translated from the Chinese-language original for reference purposes only. While this English translation
is believed to be generally accurate, it is subject to, and qualified by, in its entirety, the Chinese-language original. Such Chinese-language
original shall be the controlling document for all purposes.


 


Purchase
Advance Payment Contract


 


Party
A (payer): Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party
B (Payee): Huoshan Hongying Trading Company


 


Party
B is Party A’s raw material supplier. In order to reduce operating costs and enhance the partnership between the two parties, Party
A agrees to prepay certain prices for the purchase of corresponding raw materials for Party B’s obligation to provide Party A with
Camellia seeds. After full negotiation by both parties, the following contracts have been concluded:


 


1.
Purpose of advance payment: Party B can only use the advance payment paid by Party A to purchase camellia seed raw materials, and shall
not use it for other purposes.


 


2.
Prepaid amount: RMB 10,000,000


 


3.
As Party B’s business scope also involves Camellia seed oil, Party A may also provide Party B with Camellia seed oil of the same
value as the advance payment to offset the advance payment. The price of Camellia seed oil shall be in accordance with Party A’s
regulations.


 


4.
Repayment method: Party B will deduct the advance payment in the form of Camellia seeds or equivalent currency to Party A. The repayment
period shall not exceed twelve months per year, and special circumstances shall be negotiated separately.


 


5.
Party B promises to provide Party A with Camellia Seeds at a price that is 2% lower than the actual price of Camellia Seeds on the actual
delivery date. After the prepayment is deducted, the settlement will be based on the actual market price.


 


6.
If Party B fails to use the advance payment as required by the agreement, Party A has the right to recover the advance payment and impose
a penalty interest of three thousandths per day for the breached part.


 


7.
For matters not covered, the two parties can negotiate and conclude a supplementary contract. The supplementary contract has the same
legal effect as this contract. Any party who fails to negotiate can bring a lawsuit to the people's court in China.


 


8.
This contract is valid for one year, and it will automatically terminate when it expires.


 


9.
This contract has two copies, with each party holding one copy, and it will take effect from the date of signing.


 


/s/
Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party
A: Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Date:
May 8, 2020


 


/s/
Huoshan Hongying Trading Company


Party
B: Huoshan Hongying Trading Company


Date:
May 8, 2020
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2668]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1310-DR]


Kentucky; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY:  Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Kentucky, (FEMA-1310-DR), dated January 10, 2000, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  January 24, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The notice of a major disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Kentucky is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of January 10, 2000:

    Hancock and Henderson Counties for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 00-2668 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### JONES v. STATE.

No. 26394.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 29, 1953.

John W. Carlisle, Houston, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY,. Judge. -

This conviction is‘for violation of Art. 1379, P.C., Vernon’s Ann.P:C. art. 1379, in cutting merchantable-titnber;- the punishment five years in the penitentiary.

■ Appellant.is-the same Earl Jones -whose probation of a prior six year sentence, was revoked, -the revocation being upheld by this court in Jones v. State, No. 26165, Tex. Cr.R.,-S.W.2d-. The commission of the offense here charged was the basis of such revocation.

No effort was made to cumulate the present sentence with the former sentence, and it appears doubtful that appellant will profit from a reversal hereof. He, however, is entitled, to. have the conviction reviewed by this court, and to another trial if the record shows reversible error.

We find it unnecessary to discuss the several contentions of appellant since the case must be reversed because of the fact that appellant was- permitted tp .waive a jury and .plead guilty before the court without being represented by counsel,- by appointment df the court or otherwise.

Article 10a, V.A.C.C.P., providing for the waiver of a trial by jury in a felony case less than capital, requires that before a defendant who has no attorney can agree to waive a jury, the court must appoint an *302attorney to represent him. The requirement is mandatory. See Hernandez v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 4, 133 S.W.2d 584; Wilson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 252 S.W.2d 197.

We construe the provision “who has no attorney” to mean ah attorney who is available for the purpose of advising- and consulting the accused with reference to the cause in which he is about to waive a jury, and not an attorney whose sole responsibility and employment is in relation to other legal matters or litigation.

The testimony on motion for new trial shows that Judge Lewis, who represented appellant on the revocation of probation, did not accept employment, advise or counsel with appellant in regard to the present case, but declined to do so.

That the court offered to appoint an attorney is immaterial. Appellant could not “waive” the appointment of an attorney, and then “waive” a jury trial without counsel.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.02

DEER VALLEY CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of Deer Valley Corporation (the Company), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John S. Lawler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ John S. Lawler     
|John S. Lawler         
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 11, 2010
#### S.R. HAYNES, Appellant, v. O. E. RIPPE-TOE, county Judge, Comanche County, Texas, Appellee.

No. 2600.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

June 20, 1947.

Rehearing Denied July 16, 1947.

Holmes & Nicholson, of Comanche, for appellant.

O. E. Rippetoe, of Comanche, for appel-lee.

LONG, Justice.

This is a companion case to Haynes v. Rippetoe, County Judge, Tex.Civ.App., 203 S.W.2d 628. Our holding in that case is equally applicable here as the same questions are involved. The District Court was correct in refusing to grant a Writ of Mandamus as prayed for.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.0



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-79869 on Form S-8 of SouthBanc Shares, Inc. of our report dated November 12,
1999 appearing in the Annual Report to Stockholders of SouthBanc Shares, Inc.
for the year ended September 30, 1999 incorporated by reference in this Form
10-K.

ELLIOTT, DAVIS & COMPANY, LLP

/s/ ELLIOTT, DAVIS & COMPANY, LLP

Greenville, South Carolina
December 28, 1999