alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         33,927
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  21,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,000
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,631
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 59,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (121,084)
<BONDS>                                        (445,306)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       274,961
<OTHER-SE>                                     410,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   59,494
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               656,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,108,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,764,932)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,764,932)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                2,056,474
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   291,543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .01
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems (1190).                    

*Date and Time:*                         November 20, 2000; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 530, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Stefan T. Thynell, Program Director, Thermal Transport & Thermal Processing, Division of Chemical & Transport Systems, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 525, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 292-8371.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate nominations for the FY 2000 Career Panel of proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a                               ( print page 63103)                            proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                     

Dated: October 16, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-26982  Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 12 - 0051 6 - CR
Ex parte Dwight Ervine Brown § § § § § From t he 158th District Court

o f Denton County ( F

- 90

- 57 8

- B ) December 21, 2012
P er C uriam (nfp) 

### JUDGMENT
This court has c onsidered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM2 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEX AS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 12 - 00515 - CR NO. 02 - 12 - 00516 - CR NO. 02 - 12 - 00517 - CR NO. 02 - 12 - 00518 - CR

EX PARTE DWIGHT ERVI NE BROWN

----------

FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Dwight Ervine Brown pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea bargain to the felony offense s of burglary of a habitation , aggravated robbery, and two counts of aggravated sexual assault

. He subsequently filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court “seeking to o btain a copy of his complete trial records without cost.” The district clerk returned the application to Brown because it did not comply with rule of appellate procedure 73.1. See Tex. R. App. P. 73.1 (requiring use of specific form for application for p ost
- conviction

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.3

habeas corpus relief from felony case ). In his notice of appeal, Brown state d that he considered the application denied by operation of law. As one of our sister courts recently observed, This court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals only when expressly granted by law. No statute vests this court with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for a free copy of the trial record when such a request is not presented in conjunction with a timely filed direct appeal. Fu rthermore, an intermediate court of appeals has no jurisdiction over post

- conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. Williamson v. State , Nos. 10

- 12

- 00146

- CR, 10

- 12

- 00147

- CR, 10

- 12

- 00148

- CR,
10

- 12

- 00149

- CR, 2012 WL 2353684, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Waco Ju ne 13, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (citations omitted). On October 29, 2012, we notified Brown of o ur concern that this court lacked jurisdiction over these appeals, and we informed him that unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeals file d with the court, on or before November 19, 2012, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals, the appeals would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. We have received no response. According ly, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL , J

. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )
DELIVERED: December 21 , 201 2
---

Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Drew A. Moyer, Principal Financial Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 26, 2010 (the “Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and





(2)
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Technitrol, Inc.





Dated:  May 4, 2010
/s/ Drew A. MoyerDrew A. Moyer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be retained by Technitrol, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32



Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer



Certification of Periodic
Financial Report



Richard S. Cupp and Hwa
Kyung Kim hereby certify as follows:



1. They are
the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, respectively, of Center Financial Corporation.



2. The Form 10-K of Center Financial Corporation for the Year Ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Center Financial
Corporation.



|                     |  |                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 3, 2011 |  | /s/ Richard S. Cupp                                              
|                     |  | Richard S. Cupp                                                  
|                     |  | President & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|                     | 
|Dated: March 3, 2011 |  | /s/ Hwa Kyung Kim                                                
|                     |  | Hwa Kyung Kim                                                    
|                     |  | Vice President & Controller
(Principal Financial Officer)
P.1 

OAR Box 1781 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

90) IV-C-4 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/29/2008 10:46:22 AM Sheet 90 of 142 
P.2 

\ 

a SEZJ 

<P 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711 

DEC 8 I998 

OFFICE OF 

AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

AND STANDARDS 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

Ms. Josephine S. Cooper 

Vice President, Regulatory Affairs 

American Forest & Paper Association 

1111 Nineteenth Street, NW, Suite 800 

Washington, DC 20036 

Dear Ms. Cooper: 

Thank you for your letter of November 4,1998 that recapped the meeting between the 

American Forest and Paper Association (AFPA) and Bob Perciasepe on October 22,1998. In the 

meeting and in your letter, you stated that new source review (NSR) as is currently being 

implemented threatens your industry's ability to remain competitive. In your letter, you provided 

examples of several types of projects that are either under consideration or have been undertaken 

by the forest and paper industry and that are, or have been, subjected to NSR. You also asserted 

that the contemplated changes to NSR applicability regulations as described in the July 24,1998 

Notice of Availability would "make the PSD program more overinclusive and less clear." 

As you know, we intend for NSR Reform to be a balanced rulemaking that provides 

industry with considerable relief and flexibility for making modifications to existing sources 

without triggering NSR. To this end, we proposed provisions for plantwide applicability limits, a 

simplified test for pollution control projects, and a longer look-back period of 10 years for 

establishing a historical actual emissions baseline. We also proposed to extend the actual-tofuture actual test allowed for certain changes at utilities to all industry. In addition, in the July 

1998 notice of availability, we explained our current thinking that it may be necessary to require 

that actual emissions projection be made enforceable for 10 years in order to ensure that 

modifications to existing units do not result in significant increases in emissions. 

Notwithstanding the present rulemaking effort, you may be aware that in a meeting on 

November 20,1998, with litigants in CMA v. EPA. No. 79-1112 (D.C.Cir.) which includes 

challenges to the 1992 "WEPCO Rule," EPA discussed the possibility of resuming a full 

stakeholder process to reexamine issues of NSR applicability. Bill Pedersen and Tammy Wiles 

represented AFPA in that meeting. Consequently, in the coming weeks, EPA will be evaluating, 

with input from all stakeholders, the prospect of future discussions to consider some new 

approaches to NSR applicability in addition to those proposed in NSR reform. We will carefully 

consider your comments and examples within the context of this effort. 

Recycled/Recyclable . Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (40% Postcorisumer) 

/ 
P.3 

* 

We look forward to exploring these issues with you and other stakeholders in the 

upcoming months. 

Sincerely, 

vJohn'S. Seitz 

l-Director 

Office i)f Air Quality Planning 

and Standards 

2 -
Exhibit 15

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited
interim financial information of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, as indicated in our report dated October 21, 2010; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no
opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010 is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-105906, effective June 6, 2003).

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
|                      
|Tampa, Florida        
|October 21, 2010
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Dennis OBrien, director and Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer of Superior Silver Mines, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 14, 2009



By    /s/ Dennis OBrien



Dennis OBrien, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5693 

To extend the suspension of duty on perfluorocarbon amines. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. PAULSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on perfluorocarbon amines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERFLUOROCARBON AMINES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.90 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 perfluorocarbon amines) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 20.2

[ERNST & YOUNG LETTERHEAD]



Independent Auditors Report on Compliance

Board of Directors
WFS Financial Inc

We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated financial statements of WFS Financial Inc and subsidiaries
(WFS) as of December 31, 2002 and for the year then ended, and have issued our report thereon dated January 21, 2003.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our
attention that caused us to believe that WFS failed to, in all material respects, comply with
the terms, covenants, provisions or conditions of the Sale and
Servicing Agreement among WFS Financial 2002-2 Owner Trust, WFS Receivables Corporation and WFS Financial
Inc, dated May 1, 2002 insofar as they relate to accounting matters. However, it should be noted that our audit was not directed primarily
toward obtaining knowledge of noncompliance.

This report is intended for the use and information of the Board of Directors and management of WFS, Deutsche Bank Trust Company of Americas,
as Indenture Trustee, Chase Manhattan Bank, as Owner Trustee,
Financial Security Assurance Inc., as Insurer, Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poors, and should not be used for any other purposes.

/s/   ERNST & YOUNG LLP



January 21, 2003
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this accompanying Quarterly Report of Tech Laboratories, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005, I, Donna
Silverman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended June 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Tech Laboratories, Inc.


/s/ Donna Silverman
--------------------
Donna Silverman
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 12, 2005
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Dennis OBrien, director and Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer of Superior Silver Mines, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 12, 2010

By    /s/ Dennis OBrien



Dennis OBrien, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-21131 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROSENDO CARRILLO-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-516-ALL

-------------------- November 14, 2002 Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rosendo Carrillo-Cruz appeals his bench-trial conviction for illegal reentry after deportation following an aggravated felony. He first argues that the dismissal of the original indictment for Speedy Trial Act violations should have been with prejudice. The district court properly considered the s tatutory factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3162(a)(2), and its supporting factual findings were not

c learly in error. U nited States v. Taylor , 487 U.S . 326, 3372 g:\opin-sc\01-21131.opn.wpd (1988). Accordingly, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the first indictment without prejudice
and in permitting reindictment. S ee United States v. Blevins , 142 F.3d 223, 224 (5th Cir. 1998). Carrillo-Cruz also avers that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b), which was used to enhance his sentence based on his prior aggravated felony conviction, is unconstitutional. Carrillo-Cruz acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s dec ision in
Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998 ), but he seeks to p reserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90, 496; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). CarrilloCruz’s argument is foreclose d. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 22, 2020

No. 04-19-00192-CR & 04-19-00193-CR

John Joe AVALOS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CR-7068 & 2016-CR-10374

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On August 10, 2020 the Appellant filed a motion for rehearing en banc. The Court 

requests the State file a response on or before October 10, 2020.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of September, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court