CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

Rule No(s): Solvent cleaning portion of Rule s 4603, 4604, 4605, 4606, 4607, 4612, 4653, 4661, 4662, 4663, 4684

Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: September 20, 2007

Rule Title(s): Rule 4603 (Surface Coating of Metal Pa rts and Products); Rule 4604 (Can and Coil Coating Operations);

Rule 4605 (Aerospace Assembly and Component Coating Operations); Rule 4606 (Wood Products and Coating

Operations); Rule 4607 (Graphic Arts); Rule 4612 (Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations -

Phase II); Rule 4653 (Adhesives); Rule 4661 (Organic Solvents); Rule 4662 (Organic Solvent Degreasing

Operations); Rule 4663 (Organic Solvent Cleaning, St orage, and Disposal); Rule 4684 (Polyester Resin

Operations).

Date Submitted to ARB: October 20, 2007

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Rule 4603 - May 18, 2006; Rule 4604 - January 15, 2004; Rule

4605 - December 20, 2001; Rule 4606 - December 20, 2001; Rule 4607 - December 20, 2001; Rule 4612 - September

21, 2006; Rule 4653 December 20, 2001; Rule 4661 - May 16, 2002; Rule 4662 - December 20, 2001; Rule 4663 -

December 20, 2001; Rule 4684 - December 20, 2001.

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Sandra Lowe-Leseth Phone Number: 559-230-5834 E-mail Address: sandra.loweleseth@valleyair.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: 1.3 tons VOC per day

Inventory Year Used to Calcul ate Changes in Emissions: 1999 Area Affected: District-wide

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the C ontrol Measure: 4.9 tons VOC per day

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: 1.3 tons VOC per day

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): 9.0 tons VOC per day

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): 3.3 tons VOC per day

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: N/A

Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A %

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: N/A Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) Section 5.0 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achi eving Emission Reductions are: N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): Section 5.0 Work Practice Standards in Section(s): Section 5.0

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): Section 6.0 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): Section 6.0CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: This rule is a control meas ure in the District's 1-hour Extreme Ozone Plan. While 3.3 tons of VOC per day

would be removed from the emissions inv entory as a result of this rule proj ect, computer modeling of the reductions

shows that VOC only weakly impacts attain ment. Therefore, District staff expec t no significant impact on attainment of

the 1-hour ozone standard.