February 18, 2016

John Manning 279 E. Pace Lane North Salt Lake , UT 84 054 (801) 979 - 9 229 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE Wa shington, DC 20590 RE: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. §§ Part 21; 45.23(b); 61.113(a)&(b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b) (2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 91.119; 91.151(a); 91.203(a)&(b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409(a) (1) (2); 91.417(a)&(b) Dear Sir or Madam: I, John Manning , am writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. 11, to request that I, John Manning , an owner and operator of small unmanned aircrafts, be exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) listed below so that I, John Manning may operate my small light-weight unmanned aircraft system (“UAS”) commercially in airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”). I, John Manning , have over 15 years of commercial aviation experience . I currently hold an ATP certificate #3314756 with a First class medical . Using the DJI Phantom 2 Vision + 1 , I, John Manning , intend to provide videography, cinematography and photography services in the areas of building inspections, real estate, site surveys, aerial mapping, special events to include but not limited to weddings, private or public parties/events, geological surveying, environmental studies, outdoor recreational facilities and landscapes. I, John Manning , am committed to safety with each flight. My, John Manning’s , exemption request would permit operation of a UAS(s) in areas away from the general public, airports, heliports and vehicular traffic for community videos, and within property bound aries for individual homeowner real estate listing videos/photos.

1 Attachment – DJI Phantom 2 Vision + Specifications**I. Contact Information:**  John Manning 279 E. Pace Lane North Salt Lake City , UT 84 054 (801) 979 - 9229 johnm@iheartrchobby.com , or johnm@iheartutahrealestate.com **II. The Specific Sections of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations From**  **Which John Manning**  **Requests Exemption are:**

• 14 CFR Part 21; • 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); • 14 CFR 61.113(a) & (b); • 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a); • 14 C.F.R. 91.9(b) (2); • 14 C.F.R. 91.103(b); • 14 C.F. R. 91.109; • 14 C.F.R. 91.119; • 14 C.F.R. 91.121; • 14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b); • 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a); • 14 C.F.R. 91.405(a); • 14 CFR 407(a) (1); • 14 CFR 409(a) ( 1) & (a) (2); • 14 CFR 417(a) & (b) **III. The Extent of Relief**  **John Manning Seeks and the Reason He Seeks Such**  **Relief:** I, John Manning , am writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. 11, to request that I, John Manning , an owner and operator of small unmanned aircraft, be exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) listed below so that I may operate my small light weight unmanned aircraft system (“UAS”) commercially in airspace re gulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”). The Reform Act in Section 332 provides for such integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into our national airspace system as it is in the public’s interest to do so. My, John Manning’s , light-weight UAS meets the definition of “small unmanned aircraft” as defined in Section 331 and therefore the integration of my light-weight UAS is expressly contemplated by the Reform Act. The Reform Act guides the Secretary in determining the types of UAS's th at may operate safely in our national airspace system. Considerations include: The weight, size, speed and overall capabilities of the UAS's, whether the UAS will be operated near airports or heavily populated areas; and, whether the UAS will be operated b y line of sight 112 P.L. 95 § 333 (a). Each of these items reflect in favor of an exemption for me, John Manning
. My UAS utilizes four (4) counter- rotating propellers for balance, control and stability andis equipped with a GPS and auto return safety tec hnology. W eighing less than five (5)

pounds (far below the maximum 55 pound limit); including camera with gimbal. I, John Manning , will operate the Phantom 2 Vision + in a safe manner, using the following checklists as well as operating procedures to determine that the aircraft is physically and electronically ready for safe flight and that permission from the property owner/representative is received: **Pre -** **flight Ch ecklist:**  • Survey the property for hazards, such as trees, utility poles and other elements that might compromise the flight then make a judgment as to whether to proceed. • Check the weather for wind speed, cloud cover and any forecast changes that might ad versely affect flight safety and performance. • Examine the aircraft- looking at connections and searching for cracks and loose parts. • Determine that the electronic elements are performing correctly (receiving GPS signals along with calibration of the magn etic compass). • Determine that the barometric altimeter reflects approximately 0 feet AGL. • Following takeoff, hover at an altitude of approximately 10 feet to assure that the Home Point is solid. Then exercise all controls to confirm their functionality, if one of the controls is not functioning, the flight will be terminated immediately. • Give right- of-way to any manned aircraft. • Stay clear of FAA controlled airspace at airports (generally a five nautical mile radius) as well as restricted and prohibited zones. • Fly no higher than 400' and no further than 1000' from the Home Point, recognizing that the primary responsibility is to safely keep the aircraft safely within VLOS. • Stay clear of clouds and fog (500' vertically and 2,000' horizontally). **Post -** **flight Checklist:** • Inspect the Phantom 2 Vision + to determine its physical and electronic condition. • Examine the aircraft- looking at connections and searching for cracks and loose parts.
**IV. How**  **John Manning’s Request Will Benefit the Public as A**  **Whole:** Aerial videography and photography has been around for a long time through manned fixed wing aircraft and helicopters. For small budget companies and individuals, the expense of such aerial videography and photo graphy is cost prohibitive. Only large companies and high - income individuals can afford to absorb such expense. Manned aircraft pose a threat to the public through potential catastrophic crashes resulting in a potential loss of life. My, John Manning’s , UAS poses no such threat since size and lack of combustible fuel alleviates any potential threat to the public. Congress hasalready proclaimed that it is in the public’s interest to integrate commercially flown UAS’

into the national airspace system, hence the passing of the Reform Act. My, John Manning , light- weight UAS is battery powered and creates no emissions that can harm the environment. **V. Reasons**  **John Manning’s Exemption Will Not**  **Ad versely**  **A ffect Safety** 

**Or How the Exemption Will Provide a Level of Safety**  **A t Least Equal To Existing Rule:**  My, John Manning’s , exemption will not adversely affect safety. • My UAS weighs less than 5 pounds complete with a small ligh t- weight high definition (HD) camera. • I only operate my UAS below 400 feet (well within the 400 foot permissible ceiling set by the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012). • I land my UAS prior to manufacturer recommended minimum level of battery power . • I pilot my UAS through remote control/FPV only by line of sight. • My UAS has GPS with a flight safety feature whereby it hovers and then slowly lands if communication with the remote control pilot is lost. • I only operate in reasonably safe environments that are strictly controlled. • I conduct extensive pre -flight inspections and protocol, during which safety carries primary importance. • I always obtain all necessary permissions prior to operation. **VI. A**  **Summary the FAA M**  **ay Publish in the Federal Register:**  A. 14 C.F.R. § 21, 14 C.F.R. § 91 and 91.151: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and the Like 14 C.F.R. § 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for procurement of necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR § 91.203(a) (1). The size, weight and enclosed operational area of my, John Manning’s , UAS permi ts exemption from Part 21 because my UAS meets (and exceeds) an equivalent level of safety pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraft from the airworthiness certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 44 701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA to exempt UAS's from the airworthiness certificate requirement in consideration of the weight, size, speed, maneuverability and proximity to areas such as airports and de nse populations. My, John Manning ’s, current and projected UAS’ meet or exceed each of the elements. 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an airworthiness certificate. As no such certificate will be applicable in the form contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation is inapplicable.14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As there

are no on board pilots or passengers, and given the size of the UAS, this Regulation is inapplicable. An equ ivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining a safety/flight manual delineating areas of where safety can be defined. The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167 , 10167A, 10602, 10700 and 32827. 14 C.F.R. § 91.121 regarding altimeter settings is inapplicable insofar as my UAS utilizes electronic global positioning systems with a barometric sensor. 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a) with the condition that the PIC does not begin a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, land the UA wit h 30% battery power remaining. 14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) and (b) provides for the carrying of civil aircraft certifications and registrations. They are inapplicable for the same reasons described above. The equivalent level of safety will be achieved by m aintaining any such required certifications and registrations by me, John Manning
. B. 14 C.F.R. § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes 14 C.F.R. § 91.119 prescribes safe altitudes for the operation of civil aircraft. It allows helicopters to be operated at lower altitudes in certain conditions. My UAS will never operate at an altitude greater than 400 AGL; safely below the standard of 400 AGL. I, John Manning , will however operate my UAS in safe areas away from public and traffic, providing a level of safety at least equivalent to or below those in relation to minimum safe altitudes. Given the size, weight, maneuverability and speed of my UAS, an equivalent or higher level of safety will be achieved. C. 14 C.F.R. § 91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (1) & (2); 417 (a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections The above - cited Regulations require, amongst other things, aircraft owners and operators to have the aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter. These Regulations onl y apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. They will not, therefore, apply to my, John Manning ’s, UAS. However, as a safety precaution, I, John Manning , inspect my UAS before and after each flight.A Summary the FAA May Publish in the Federa l Register: A. 14 C.F.R. 21 and 14

C.F.R. 91: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and the Like. 14 C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for procurement of necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR § 91.203(a)(1). The size, weight and enclosed operational area of my UAS permit exemption from Part 21 because my, John Manning ’s, UAS meets an equivalent level of safety pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraft from the airworthiness certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA to exempt UAS’ from the airworthiness certificate requirement in consideration of the wei ght, size, speed, maneuverability and proximity to areas such as airports and dense populations. My UAS meets or exceeds each of the elements. 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an airworthiness certificate. As no such certi fi cate will be applicable in the form contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation is inapplicable. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As there are no pilots or passengers, and given the size of the UAS’, this Regulat ion is inapplicable. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining a manual. The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, maintenance program that involves regular software updates and curative measures for any damaged hardware. Therefore, an equivalent level of safety will be achieved. **In summary ,**  **John Manning seeks an exemption from the follow**  **ing Regulations:** 14 C.F.R. § 21, Subpart H; 14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b); 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.7 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.103 (b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.119; 14 C.F.R. § 91.121; 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) and (b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.405 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.407 (a) (1); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a) (2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a) (1); and, 14 C.F.R. § 91.417 (a) & (b) I, John Manning , am requesting this exemption for the purposes of aerial photography, cinematography, videography, inspections and other flight operations. The reason for such a general and broad based request is that I, John Manning , wish to utilize a business strategy that capitalizes on opportunities as they may arise in the future. My, John Manning , business model is based on the idea of offering ad hoc small UAS services to individuals or companies who wish to employ these services as a safe, effective, and legal option to enhance their business or hobby. Granting my, John Manning’s , request for exemption will reduce current risk levels and thereby enhance safety. My UAS craft does not contain potentially explosive fuel, is sm aller, lighter and more maneuverable than conventional video and photographic aircraft. Further, I operate at lower altitudes and in controlled airspace eliminating potential public risk flying to and from established air fields. There are no personnel on board my, John Manning ’s, UAS and therefore the likelihood of death or serious bodily injury is significantly diminished. My, John Manning ’s, operation of my UAS, weighing less than 5 pounds and travelling at lower speeds within limited areas will provide anequivalent level of safety as that achieved under current FARs. Accordingly I, John

Manning , respectfully request that the FAA grant my exemption. Respectfully submitted, John Manning 279 E. Pace Lane North Salt Lake City , UT 84054 (801) 979 - 92 29 johnm@iheartrchobby.com or johnm@iheartutahrealestate.com Attachment: DJI Phantom 2 Vision + Specifications DJI PHANTOM 2 Vision + TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS D JI only utilizes safe and reliable UASs. DJI is an industry leader in small UAS production. DJI UASs are loaded with ground breaking software enabling the user to set parameters which will not allow flight into controlled airsp ace. Parameters can also be set to limit flight to no higher than a predetermined and set altitude as well as limit flight to a predetermined and set distance. In addition, DJI software provides real -time altitude and location information to the PIC via th e linked monitor (smart phone/tablet devices) 2.1 DJI Phantom 2 Vision + 2.1.1 Aircraft 2.1.1.1 Supported Battery – DJI 5200 mAh LiPo 2S 2.1.1.2 We ight (Battery & Propellers Included) – 1 16 0 g 2.1.1.3 Hover Accuracy (Ready to Fly) – Vertical: 10cm; Hori zontal: 1m 2.1.1.4 Max Ascent Speed – 5m/s 2.1.1.5 Max Descent Speed – 3m/s 2.1.1.6 Max Flight Speed – 16m/s (ATTI mode, no wind) 2.1.2 Gimbal 2.1.2.1 Controllable Range – Pitch: - 90 + 30 2.1.2.2 Stabilization – 3 - zxis (pitch, roll, yaw) 2.1.3 Camera 2.1.3.1 Sensor – Sony EXMOR 2.1.3.2 Sensor Size – 1/2.3” 2.1.3.3 Effective Pixels – 12.4M 2.1.3.4 Video Recording Mode – 4096x2160p, 3840x2160p, 1920x1080p, 1280x720p 2.1.4 Remote Controller 2.1.4.1 Operating Frequency – 5.728GHz
- 5.8GHz2 .1.4.2 Max Dista nce – 2000m 2.1.4.3 Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER) - 101dBm+/- 2dBm 2.1.4.4 Transmitter Power (EIRP) – FCC: 20dBm, CE: 16dBm 2.1.4.5 Wo rking Voltage – 12A@7.4V