alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 264 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 264

    To provide for semiannual actuarial studies of the FHA mortgage 
  insurance program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 
 during periods that the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund does not meet 
                  minimum capital ratio requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2013

  Mr. Lynch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for semiannual actuarial studies of the FHA mortgage 
  insurance program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 
 during periods that the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund does not meet 
                  minimum capital ratio requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FHA Enhanced Oversight Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. SEMIANNUAL ACTUARIAL STUDIES OF MMIF DURING PERIODS OF CAPITAL 
              DEPLETION.

    Paragraph (4) of section 202(a) of the National Housing Act (12 
U.S.C. 1708(a)(4)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by inserting ``except as 
        provided in subparagraph (B),'' after ``to be conducted 
        annually,'';
            (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ``, except as 
        provided in subparagraph (B),'' after ``annually'';
            (3) by striking the paragraph designation and heading and 
        all that follows through ``The Secretary shall provide'' and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(4) Independent actuarial study.--
                    ``(A) Annual study.--The Secretary shall provide''; 
                and
            (4) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(B) Semiannual studies during periods of capital 
                depletion.--During any period that the Fund fails to 
                maintain sufficient capital to comply with the capital 
                ratio requirement under section 205(f)(2)--
                            ``(i) the independent study required by 
                        subparagraph (A) shall be conducted 
                        semiannually and shall analyze the financial 
                        position of the Fund as of September 30 and 
                        March 31 of each fiscal year during such 
                        period; and
                            ``(ii) the Secretary shall submit a report 
                        meeting the requirements of subparagraph (A) 
                        for each such semiannual study.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                ENERGYSOUTH, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     1998       1997       1996 
                                                    ------     ------     ------
<S>                                                 <C>        <C>        <C>   
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:(1)

Earnings applicable to common stock                 $8,417     $8,126     $8,631

Weighted average common shares outstanding           4,865      4,844      4,826

Basic earnings per share                            $ 1.73     $ 1.68     $ 1.79


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:(1)

Earnings applicable to common stock                 $8,417     $8,126     $8,631

Weighted average common shares outstanding           4,865      4,844      4,826

Incremental shares resulting from assumed
    exercise of stock options                           61         37         12

Weighted average common shares outstanding,
    assuming dilution                                4,926      4,881      4,838

Diluted earnings per share                          $ 1.71     $ 1.66     $ 1.78
</TABLE>


(1)  Restated to reflect the three-for-two conversion of Mobile Gas common stock
     into EnergySouth common stock effective February 2, 1998.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          22,136
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          33,688
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    250,209
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        861,257
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,220,267
<DEPOSITS>                                     872,340
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,780
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             17,669
<LONG-TERM>                                    239,091
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           678
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,709
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,220,267
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,934
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  220
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 3,720
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,874
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,149
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,741
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,984
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       41
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,004
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,004
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,709
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.11
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,250
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    14
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,708
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,147
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     (61)
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,294
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,052
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,242


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61010-61011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of 
October 16, 2000.
    A closed meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 17, 2000 at 10:30 
a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(4), 
(8), (9)(A) and (10), permit consideration for the scheduled matters at 
the closed meeting.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting scheduled Tuesday, 
October 17, 2000 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and

[[Page 61011]]

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: October 10, 2000.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26461 Filed 10-11-00; 11:29 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5726 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Lanthanum phosphate for use in the 

production of fluorescent lamps. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Lanthanum phosphate 

for use in the production of fluorescent lamps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LANTHANUM PHOSPHATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5726 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Lanthanum phosphate 

phosphor, activated by cerium and terbium, inorganic used as luminophores 

(CAS Nos. 13778–59–1, 

13454–71–2, and 13863– 

48–4 or 95823–34–0) 

(provided for in subheading 2846.90.80) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-15695

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 0:13-cv-60957-RLR

ELIZABETH JENKINS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GRANT THORNTON LLP, 

GRANT THORNTON LLP HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN,

et al.

 Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(July 11, 2016)

Before WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges, and WOOD,∗ District 

Judge.

 ∗ Honorable Lisa Godbey Wood, United States District Chief Judge for the Southern District 

of Georgia, sitting by designation.

Case: 14-15695 Date Filed: 07/11/2016 Page: 1 of 2 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Plaintiff-Appellant Elizabeth Jenkins appeals the district court’s partial grant 

of a motion to dismiss and entry of summary judgment for Defendants-Appellees 

Grant Thornton LLP (GT); Grant Thornton LLP Health and Welfare Benefits Plan 

(the Health Plan); and Grant Thornton LLP Employees’ Retirement Plan (the 

Pension Plan). Jenkins, proceeding pro se, filed suit under the Employee 

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., to 

recover long-term disability benefits she believes are due to her under the Health 

Plan, retirement benefits she believes are due to her under the Pension Plan, and 

document penalties for GT’s alleged failure to provide her with the plan documents 

she requested. Additionally, Jenkins seeks equitable relief on behalf of the Health 

Plan for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. 

On appeal, Jenkins argues that the district court: (1) erred in dismissing 

several counts of her amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which 

relief may be granted; (2) abused its discretion in denying her motion to quash 

certain subpoenas and in issuing discovery sanctions against her; and (3) erred in 

granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 

After reviewing the record and having had the benefit of oral argument, we 

conclude the district court did not commit reversible error as to any issue.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-15695 Date Filed: 07/11/2016 Page: 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC 

 

v. Case No.: 6:20-cv-00475-ADA 

 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ET AL 

ORDER 

BE IT REMEMBERED on this day, there was presented to the Court the Motion for Admission 

Pro Hac Vice filed by Nathaniel R. Scharn (“Applicant”), counsel for Dell Inc., Dell Technologies 

Inc., EMC Corporation, and the Court, having reviewed the motion, enters the following order: 

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED, and Applicant 

may appear on behalf of Dell Inc., Dell Technologies Inc., EMC Corporation in the above case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately 

tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local 

Court Rule AT-1(f)(2). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the corresponding Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice was 

e-filed, the attorney who filed the Motion on behalf of the Applicant is directed to notify the Applicant 

of this order. 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Applicant, pursuant to the Administrative Policies and 

Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal cases in the Western District of Texas, shall 

register as a filing user within 10 days of the date of this Order, if he/she has not previously done so on 

a prior case in this District. 

SIGNED this the 15th day of November, 2021. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 120 Filed 11/15/21 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7243

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GUSTAV W. KLOSZEWSKI, a/k/a Jay Denmark,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,

Senior District Judge. (5:91-cr-00057; 5:92-cr-00023;

5:95-cr-00008; 5:95-cr-00021)

Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 16, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gustav W. Kloszewski, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gustav W. Kloszewski appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United

States v. Kloszewski, Nos. 5:91-cr-00057; 5:92-cr-00023;

5:95-cr-00008; 5:95-cr-00021 (W.D.N.C. May 31, 2006). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0082

CITY OF BILLINGS,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KATRINA LYNN HOFMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 28, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 19 2020

11/19/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0082
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarter Report of Solar Wind Energy TowerInc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald W. Pickett, Chief Financial Officer of Solar Wind Energy Tower, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  

 

/s/ Ronald W. Pickett

Ronald W. Pickett

Chief Financial Officer

 

Date:  May 13, 2013
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23 - 0262

_________________ IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: CARLA CRUZ,

Petitioner and Appellee, and CARLOS A. CRUZ HERNANDEZ,

Respondent and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Leslie Halligan , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 8 2023

11/08/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0262
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Drew A. Moyer, Principal Financial Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31,
      2006 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2)   information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Technitrol, Inc.


Dated: May 9, 2006                                     /s/ Drew A. Moyer
       -----------                                     -------------------
                                                       Drew A. Moyer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be
retained by Technitrol, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of
the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stone Container Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles A. Hinrichs, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/CHARLES A. HINRICHSCharles A. Hinrichs Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 14, 2003 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Stone Container Corporation and will be retained by Stone Container Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
#### FOX v. STATE.

No. 24501.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 16, 1949.

*481O. H. Woodrow, Sherman, Cox & Cox, Sherman, for appellant.

Ralph Elliott, County Attorney, Sherman, Rayburn Nall, Asst. County Attorney, Sherman, Hal Rawlins, Asst. County Attorney, Sherman, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is possession of whiskey in a dry area for the purpose of sale. The punishment assessed is a fine of $250.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to justify and sustain his conviction. The record reflects that on the 10th day of July, 1948, officers, armed with a search warrant, went to the home of appellant with the purpose of searching the same for intoxicating liquor. Upon their arrival at his home, they found that he was absent but his wife was there. They handed her a copy of the search warrant and then began their search, and in a kitchen cabinet they found one unopened pint of Bourbon DeLux whiskey. They then went over into a 6-acre pasture in which a barn was located and near the barn buried in the ground they found a milk can which contained nine pints of Bourbon DeLux whiskey. They took possession of this whiskey, carried it to the sheriff’s office, and then made a complaint against appellant. The testimony of the defendant as well as that of the widow of Rat Cox,, deceased, and other witnesses is to the effect that the pasture and barn was separated from appellant’s home by a fence; that Rat Cox had rented it from appellant; that Cox had the possession of the pasture and barn and had control thereof at the time the whiskey was found by the searching officers; that Rat Cox was a notorious bootlegger. This testimony is uncontra-dicted by any fact or circumstance. Moreover, a Negro by the name of Brown testified that he worked for Rat Cox about the time in question; that at the direction of Rat Cox he buried a milk can in the shed part of the barn located in the pasture near appellant’s home and placed the whiskey therein. This is, in substance, all of the evidence introduced by both the state and the defendant. It occurs to us that the evidence in this case wholly fails to connect appellant with the possession of the whiskey in question since he was not in possession of the premises where the whiskey was found, nor is there any evidence that he exercised any control over it or the premises. The evidence barely raises a suspicion, but suspicious circumstances do not justify a conviction for a penal offense. In support of the opinion here expressed, we refer to the following authorities : Gonzales v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 48, 156 S.W.2d 988; George v. State, 144 Tex.Cr.R. 183, 162 S.W.2d 110; Frazier v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 334, 158 S.W.2d 809; and Crutchfield v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 569, 132 S.W.2d 855.

From what we have said it follows that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and remanded, and it is so ordered.

Opinion approved by the Court