61158 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 200 / Monday, October 16, 2000 / Notices

Committee’s knowledge concerning

other energy-related statistical matters.

Tentative Agenda

Thursday, November 2, 2000

A. Opening Remarks by the Chair, Room

8E–089

B. Major Topics

1. Opening Remarks by EIA’s Acting

Administrator, Room 8E–089

2. A Briefing: EIA’s New Approach to

Long-Term International Energy

Forecasting, 8E–089

3. Some Challenges in Long-Term

International Energy Modeling,

Room GH–019

4. Implementing a New Sampling

Technique for Monthly Electric

Power Data Collections , GH–027

5. Survey Design for Residential and

Commercial Consumption Surveys,

GH–035

6. Summary of the Previous Three

Break-Out Sessions by EIA

Presenters, 8E–089

7. New Ways to Process, Store and

Make EIA Data Accessible, 8E–089

8. Estimating Procedures to Reduce

Data Reporting Lags, 8E–089

9. Interactive Session: Cognitive

Testing of Potential EIA Graphic

Standards Redesign, 8E–089

Friday, November 3, 2000

C. Major Topics

1. Monte Carlo Analysis of

Uncertainty in CO2 Emissions,

Room 8E–089

2. Optimization and Visualization of

the North American Eastern

Interconnect Power Market, Room

8E–089

3. The Feasibility Study for Surveying

Industrial Natural Gas Consumers,

Room 8E–089

4. A Briefing: Winter Energy

Assessment for the U.S., 8E–089

5. Public Comment, 8E–089

D. Closing Remarks by the Chair, 8E–

089

Public Participation: The meeting is

open to the public. The Chair of the

Committee is empowered to conduct the

meeting in a fashion that will facilitate

the orderly conduct of business. Written

statements may be filed with the

committee either before or after the

meeting. If there are any questions,

please contact Mr. William I. Weinig,

EIA Committee Liaison, at the address

or telephone number listed above.

Minutes: Available for public review

and copying at the Public Reading

Room, (Room 1E–190), 1000

Independence Avenue, SW,

Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586–3142,

between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,

Monday through Friday.

Issued at Washington, DC, on October 11,

2000.

Rachel M. Samuel,

Deputy Advisory Committee Management

Officer.

[FR Doc. 00–26457 Filed 10–13–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EL00–109–001]

Alternate Power Source, Inc.,

Complainant v. ISO New England, Inc.,

Respondent; Notice of Amendment to

Complaint

October 10, 2000.

Take notice that on October 4, 2000,

Alternate Power Source, Inc. (APS),

tendered for filing an Amended

Complaint under Section 206 and 306 of

the Federal Power Act in which APS

petitions the Commission for an order

directing ISO New England, Inc. (ISO–

NE) to suspend the April, 2000 ICAP

auction ‘‘clearing price’’; cease and

desist from requiring APS to pay into

escrow $700,000 for the month of April,

2000; refund all late fees and interest

charges regarding the disputed April

ICAP deficiency charge; cease and desist

from ‘‘settling’’ the ICAP prices for the

months of May, June and July, 2000, and

from requiring any payments into

escrow until a thorough investigation of

all conduct and actions is completed;

and if, after an investigation, there is a

finding of anomalous conduct in the socalled ICAP auction ‘‘market’’ for the

months April through July, 2000, direct

ISO–NE to mitigate ICAP prices for

those months.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest this filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

in accordance with Rules 211 and 214

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

385.214). All such motions or protests

must be filed on or before October 16,

2000. Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room. This filing may

also be viewed on the Internet at http:/

/www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call

202–208–2222) for assistance. Answers

to the complaint shall also be due on or

before October 16, 2000.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–26443 Filed 10–13–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP00–40–002]

Florida Gas Transmission Company;

Notice of Application

October 10, 2000.

Take notice that on September 29,

2000, Florida Gas Transmission

Company (FGT), 1400 Smith Street, P.O.

Box 1188, Houston, Texas 77251–1188,

filed in Docket No. CP00–40–002 an

amendment to its application in Docket

Nos. CP00–40–000 and 001, pursuant to

Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act

(NGA) and Part 157 of the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission’s

(Commission) Regulations, to: (1) Reroute approximately six miles of the

Bayside Lateral, in Hillsborough

County, FL; (2) eliminate approximately

24 miles of the previously proposed

mainline Loops D and E in Suwannee,

Columbia, Bradford, Clay, and Putnam

Counties, FL, and, instead, increase the

horsepower installed at Compressor

Station No. 17, in Marion County, FL;

(3) make minor modifications to the

beginning of West Leg Loop J, in

Gilchrist County, FL, and the ending of

West Leg Loop K, in Levy County, FL;

and (4) slightly decrease the horsepower

to be installed at Compressor Stations

15A, 16, 26, and 27, in Taylor, Bradford,

Citrus, and Hillsborough Counties, FL,

respectively, all as more fully set forth

in the application which is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection. This filing may be viewed

on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/

online/rims.htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance).

FGT continues to request that the

Commission find that the costs of the

proposed Phase V Expansion can be

rolled-in to establish rates for service

under its incrementally priced Rate

Schedule FTS–2. FGT states that the

maximum rates applicable to Rate

Schedule FTS–2 are expected to be

lower as a result of such rolling-in of

costs and thus, will not require

subsidies from existing shippers.

FGT states that the proposed revisions

to facilities will result in no changes to

the proposed service, but are made in

order to reduce the environmental