alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joint Advisory to the Court Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

SOUTH TEXAS FRAC LLC §

Plaintiff §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-cv-00678

V. §

§

PHOENIX PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO. § 

Defendant §

JOINT ADVISORY TO THE COURT REGARDING 

MOTIONS SET FOR HEARING ON OCTOBER 4, 2021

The parties provide this Joint Advisory to the Court regarding the motions set for 

hearing on October 4, 2021. 

1. Counsel for the parties conferred on South Texas Frac LLC’s and WI Texas Frac 

LLC’s Motion to Hold Phoenix Process Equipment Co. in Contempt of Court, Motion for 

Sanctions, Motion for Protective Order, Motion to Vacate, Motion to Compel, and Request for 

Expedited Hearing [Dkt. No. 110]. Phoenix has agreed to provide dates for the deposition of 

Alex Embry in October or November, dependent on Mr. Embrey’s availability, and has agreed 

to provide Mr. Embry’s contact information to counsel for South Texas Frac and WI Texas 

Frac. There is no need for a hearing on this motion.

2. Counsel for the parties also had a lengthy conference regarding the numerous 

motions between the parties seeking to exclude the other parties’ experts [Dkt. Nos. 106, 

113, 115, 119, 122, 123, 124, and 126]. Despite their best efforts, the parties were unable to 

reach a resolution on these motions and require a hearing before the Court. 

3. The parties further request the Court’s assistance in securing a new trial date 

for this matter. The parties are also conferring on potentially extending some scheduling 

order dates but will file a motion with the Court if the Court’s assistance is needed.

Case 5:20-cv-00678-OLG-HJB Document 156 Filed 10/01/21 Page 1 of 3
Joint Advisory to the Court Page 2

Respectfully submitted,

POPE, HARDWICKE, CHRISTIE, SCHELL, KELLY &

TAPLETT, LLP

 By: /s/ Robert L. Florance, IV

Robert L. Florance, IV

State Bar No. 24087520

rflorance@popehardwicke.com 

500 West Seventh Street, Suite 600

Fort Worth, Texas 76102-4751

Phone: (817) 332-3245

Fax: (817) 877-4781

/s/ Michael McCrum

Michael McCrum

Texas State Bar No. 13493200

MCCRUM LAW OFFICE

404 East Ramsey Rd., Suite 102

San Antonio, Texas 78216

Phone: (210) 225-2285

Fax: (210) 225-7045

michael@mccrumlegal.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

SOUTH TEXAS FRAC LLC AND 

COUNTER-DEFENDANT WI TEXAS FRAC, LLC

And

BENJAMIN, VANA, MARTINEZ & CANO, LLP

By: _/s/ Stephen K. Luxton __________________

Matthew B. Cano

State Bar No. 03757050

Email: mcano@benlawsa.com

Stephen K. Luxton

State Bar No. 24087953

Email: sluxton@benlawsa.com

3600 Bee Caves Road, Suite 201

Austin, Texas 78746

Phone: (512) 732-1880 

Fax: (210) 881-0668

Case 5:20-cv-00678-OLG-HJB Document 156 Filed 10/01/21 Page 2 of 3
Joint Advisory to the Court Page 3

Ricardo G. Cedillo

State Bar No. 04043600

Email: rcedillo@lawdcm.com

Brian L. Lewis

State Bar No. 24060166

Email: blewis@lawdcm.com

McCombs Plaza, Suite 250

755 E. Mulberry Avenue

San Antonio, Texas 78212

Telephone: (210) 822-6666

Telecopier: (210) 660-3795

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT PHOENIX

PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO.

Case 5:20-cv-00678-OLG-HJB Document 156 Filed 10/01/21 Page 3 of 3
Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Nevada Geothermal Power Inc., a company organized under the British Columbia Company Act (the "Company") on Form 20-F, Amendment #1 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Jack W. Mulligan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and result of operations

of the Company.



/s/  Jack W. Milligan

Jack W. Milligan, Chief Financial Officer





Date: July 14, 2005





#
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Patrick J. Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Patrick J. Moore    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Patrick J. Moore        |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| August 10, 2009    |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc.and will be retained by Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, !v!-30 

West Building ground floor 

Room Wl2-140 

1200 New Jersey A venue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Extension of exemption from 14 CPR, Part 65.75(a) allowing the Aviation Mechanic General (~¥G) ~~~ii·~:·:) 

tests to be ad.rninistered after completing the corresponding portion of the curriculum. Exemption No. !65:25. ~~~U.Iatocy 

Docket No. F AA-2012-0363 t.)J 

Dear Sir or Madam, /0 

Del Mar College (OM C) operates an P AA approved Aviation Maintenance Technician School (AMTS), in Corpus Christi, 

TX under Air Agency Certificate D18T094K. 

PETITION: 

DMC is requesting an extension of the exemption from 14 CPR, Part 65.75(a) that expires on May 31, 2014 and allows the 

Aviation Mechanic General written tests (AMG) to be administered after completing the corresponding portion of the 

curriculum, prior to meeting experience requirements of §65. 77. 

Person(s) to be covered by the exemption: DMC, Air Agency Dl8T094K and students enrolled in its AMTS program in 

the Airframe, Powerplant, or Airframe and Powerplant curricula. 

Information, views, or arguments to support the action soug.l}t: There has been no change in t.l}e C{)nditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. The requested extension of the 

exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to DMC and the 

students served by it. 

Si~....t:"\.~ 

~\,.;:::. 

Program Director - Aviation Maintenance Technology Program 

Del Mar College 

101 Baldwin Blvd 

Corpus Christi, Texas 78404 

cc: Harry Kiter, PMl, San Antonio FSDO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 00-71]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 00-71 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 60634)          ( print page 60635)          ( print page 60636)    
 

 

 

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[FR Doc. 00-26172 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
Group 3 – Google’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief 

(Civil Case Nos. 6:20-cv-00573-ADA, 6:20-cv-00575-ADA, 

6:20-cv-00577-ADA, and 6:20-cv-00585-ADA) 

EXHIBIT #1 

Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 2 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 3 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 4 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 5 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 6 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 7 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 8 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 9 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 10 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 11 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 12 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 13 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 14 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 15 of 16
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 16 of 16
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 7, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1420 Lower Tribunal No. 22-11450

________________ 

### Juan Enrique Madiedo , Appellant,
vs. 

### Kimberly Whitaker, etc.,

Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Migna Sanchez-Llorens, Judge. Hernandez Law, P.L., and Andy R. Hernandez, for appellant. Krinzman Huss Lubetsky Feldman & Hotte, Michael I. Feldman and Lynette Ebeoglu McGuinness, for appellee. Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27008]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to Sections 104 and 
107 of CERCLA

    Notice is hereby given that on September 22, 2000, the United 
States lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the United States District 
Court for the Southern District of Texas, in United States of America 
v. Advanced Resin Systems, Inc., No. H-99-4357, pursuant to sections 
104 and 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation 
and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9604 and 9607. The 
proposed Consent Decree resolves civil claims of the United States 
against twenty-three separate parties in connection with the Archem 
Site, located in Houston, Texas. The settling parties will pay a total 
of $1,070,000 to the United States in reimbursement of response costs 
incurred at the Site by the Environmental Protection Agency.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, United 
States Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, 
Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to United States of America 
v. Advanced Resin Systems, Inc., DJ No. 90-11-2-1328/1.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney for the Southern District of Texas, 515 Rusk, 
Ste. 3300, Houston, Texas 77002, and the Region VI Office of the United 
States Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, 
Texas, 75202. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained by 
mail from the Department of Justice Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 
7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In requesting a copy, please enclose a 
check for reproduction costs (at 25 cents per page) in the amount of 
$10.25, payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Walker B. Smith,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-27008 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
#### David M. Gelman, Appellant, v Herbert Kliegerman et al., Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to retain an interest in a certain limited partnership, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.), entered May 26, 1989, which, *inter alia,*granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, denied the plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint, and declared, *inter alia,*that the plaintiff was not entitled to retain the partnership interest in question.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We concur with the Supreme Court’s finding that paragraph 10.4 of the governing partnership agreement unambiguously provides that, in the event that a partner should die, the partnership "shall purchase his interest” in exchange for a purchase price to be calculated according to a stated formula. Since the written agreement is, in relevant part, free of any ambiguity *(see generally, Chimart Assocs. v Paul,*66 NY2d 570, 572-573; *Teitelbaum Holdings v Gold,*48 NY2d 51, 56), and since the plaintiff, who is the executor of a deceased

*509partner, failed to offer evidentiary proof so as to create an issue of fact as to whether the agreement should be reformed, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendants. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.B


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2004, of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Director, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Greg G. Gruber
                                           Senior Vice President, Chief
                                           Financial Officer, Treasurer
                                             and Director
                                           (Principal Financial
                                             and Accounting Officer)

                                           November 12, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and will be retained by Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Randgold Resources Limited(the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the yearended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, D. Mark Bristow, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                  |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ D. Mark Bristow D.Mark Bristow Chief Executive Officer October 27,2005

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2727 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2727

 To amend the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 to provide 
that not less than 40 percent of amounts available from the fund under 
 that Act shall be available for the Land and Water Conservation Fund 
                       State Assistance Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2013

 Mr. McKinley (for himself, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, and 
Mr. Lowenthal) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 to provide 
that not less than 40 percent of amounts available from the fund under 
 that Act shall be available for the Land and Water Conservation Fund 
                       State Assistance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR THE LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND 
              STATE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 5 of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 
U.S.C. 460l-7) is amended by inserting ``and not less than 40 per 
centum of such appropriations shall be available for the Land and Water 
Conservation Fund State Assistance Program'' after ``Not less than 40 
per centum of such appropriations shall be available for Federal 
purposes''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Form 10-Q of Worldwide Biotech & Pharmaceutical Company
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Peiyi Tian, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
Peiyi Tian


Peiyi
Tian


Principal
Accounting Officer


May 19,
2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 D0 11 3

. D A NNY O. NEAL v . FEDERAL HOME LOAN M ORTGAGE CORP.

Th i s cas e b eg an as a di s p o s s es s o ry p ro ceed i n g i n m ag i s t rat e co u rt

. Fo l l o wi n g

an ad v ers e ru l in g, Dan ny O. Neal fi l ed a p et i ti o n fo r a wri t o f cert i o rari i n t h e s u p eri o r

co u rt

. On Sep t em

b er 27 , 2 0 16 , t h e s u per i o r c o u rt i s s u ed an o rd er d ecl i n i n g to

s an ct i o n Neal ’ s p et i t i o n

. N eal fi l ed t h is ap p l i ca t i o n f o r d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew o n Oct o b er 5 , 2 0 1 6 . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i on

. Gen eral ly
, an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret io n ary rev i ew m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 day s

o f en t ry o f th e o rd er s o u gh t t o b e ap p eal ed

. See O CGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ). Th e un d erl y i n g

s u b ject m at t er o f an ap p eal
, h o wev er, co n t ro ls o v er t h e rel i ef s o u g h t in d et erm i n i n g
t h e pro per ap p el l at e pro ced u re. See Re b i c h v

. Mi l es , 2 6 4 Ga. 4 6 7 , 4 6 7 -4 6 8 (4 4 8 SE2 d 1 9 2 ) (1 9 9 4). Th e un d erl y i n g s u b ject m at t er h ere i s a d is po s s es s o ry ju d g m en t

. Un d er O CGA § 4 4

- 7

- 5 6 , a n ap p eal fro m a d i s p o s s es s ory ju d g m en t m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n s ev en d ay s o f t h e dat e t he ju d g m en t was en t ered

. See Ra y M. W r i gh t , In c. v. Jo n es , 2 3 9 Ga. Ap p

. 5 2 1 , 5 2 2 -5 2 3 (5 2 1 SE 2 d 4 5 6 ) (1 9 9 9 ). Neal ’ s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

ap peal i s u n t i m el y , as i t was fi led ei g h t d ay s aft er t h e s u peri o r co urt ’ s

o rd er w as en t ered

. Acco r d i ng l y , we l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n t o rev i ew t hi s ap p l i cat i o n, wh i ch i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED. November 04, 2016C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/04/2016