alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Publicatieblad C 27A/27 j

| | ISSN 1977-0995 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 27A |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 58e jaargang27 januari 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0995

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 27A

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

58e jaargang27 januari 2015

---

| Nummer | Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rectificaties |
| 2015/C 027A/01 | Rectificatie van de oproep tot het indienen van blijken van belangstelling — Tijdelijke arbeidscontractanten administrateurs-onderzoekers (functiegroep IV) op het gebied van parlementair onderzoek — (PB C 55 A van 26 februari 2014 ) | 1 |

Nummer

Inhoud

Bladzijde

Rectificaties

2015/C 027A/01

Rectificatie van de oproep tot het indienen van blijken van belangstelling — Tijdelijke arbeidscontractanten administrateurs-onderzoekers (functiegroep IV) op het gebied van parlementair onderzoek — (PB C 55 A van 26 februari 2014 )

(PB C 55 A van 26 februari 2014 )

1

---

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

Rectificaties

| 27.1.2015 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CA 27/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2015

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CA 27/1

---

Rectificatie van de oproep tot het indienen van blijken van belangstelling — Tijdelijke arbeidscontractanten administrateurs-onderzoekers (functiegroep IV) op het gebied van parlementair onderzoek

(Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie
  C 55 A van 26 februari 2014
  )

(2015/C 027 A/01)

Bladzijde 4, titel VIII, laatste zin:

in plaats van:

„Het contract wordt opgesteld overeenkomstig de artikelen 3 bis, 84 en 85 van de RAP.”,

te lezen:

„Het contract wordt opgesteld overeenkomstig de artikelen 3 ter, 84 en 88 van de RAP.”.

---
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CHARLIE J. JACKSON,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________

2024-1292

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 23-3623, Chief Judge Margaret C. 

Bartley, Judge William S. Greenberg, and Judge Joseph L. 

Toth.

______________________

Before DYK, WALLACH, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

In response to the court’s January 22, 2024 show cause 

order, Charlie J. Jackson urges the court to excuse his untimely-filed notice of appeal. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs has not responded.

The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans 

Claims entered final judgment in this case on October 6, 

Case: 24-1292 Document: 7-1 Page: 1 Filed: 03/22/2024
2 JACKSON v. MCDONOUGH

2023. The Veterans Court received Mr. Jackson’s notice of 

appeal 74 days later on December 19, 2023.

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 60 

days of the entry of judgment. See 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 

U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); Fed. Cir. R. 

1(a)(1)(D). As with appeals from district courts, the statutorily prescribed time for filing appeals from the Veterans 

Court is jurisdictional, meaning that we cannot take account of individual circumstances for the untimely filing. 

See Wagner v. Shinseki, 733 F.3d 1343, 1348 (Fed. Cir. 

2013); see also Henderson v. Shinseki, 562 U.S. 428, 438–

39 (2011) (indicating jurisdictional restrictions on the time 

for taking an appeal under section 7292(a)). Because Mr. 

Jackson’s notice of appeal was not filed within 60 days of 

the judgment of the Veterans Court, this court lacks jurisdiction and must dismiss.*

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

* The court notes that Mr. Jackson’s notice of appeal, 

filed with the Veterans Court within 30 days after the time 

to appeal expired, appears to argue that he was not timely 

served with the Veterans Court’s judgment. ECF No. 1-2 

at 1. We deem it appropriate to transmit this order to the 

Veterans Court for it to consider whether Mr. Jackson’s 

submission could be construed as a motion for that court to 

extend the time to appeal and, if so, whether such relief is 

appropriate. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(c), Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(5); cf. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a).

Case: 24-1292 Document: 7-1 Page: 2 Filed: 03/22/2024
JACKSON v. MCDONOUGH 3

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit a copy of 

this order and ECF No. 1-2 to the United States Court of 

Appeals for Veterans Claims for its consideration.

March 22, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

cc: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

 

Case: 24-1292 Document: 7-1 Page: 3 Filed: 03/22/2024
#### In the Matter of W. Horace Williams, Jr., Petitioner, against Williams-McWilliams Industries, Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

December 19, 1957.

*783*A. Edward Masters, David Hartfield, Jr.*and *Edward Wolfe*for petitioner.

*Thomas G. Platt, Jr.,*for respondent.

Matthew M. Levy, J.

Petitioner seeks an order compelling respondent, a Delaware corporation of which petitioner is a director, to allow him and his representatives to examine respondent’s stock books and stock records, to make extracts therefrom or copies thereof, and to direct respondent to furnish petitioner, at petitioner’s expense, a certified copy of the stockholders’ list of the corporation. The respondent has cross-moved to dismiss the petition as a matter of law. Respondent’s application has been grounded on the contention that the petition *“*fails to state facts sufficient to entitle Petitioner to the relief sought in his petition and that this Court has no jurisdiction to grant the relief sought herein ”.

The basis for the first ground, as argued by respondent, is that there has been no refusal by it to comply with petitioner’s demand *(Matter of Davis*v. *Keilsohn Offset Co.,*273 App. Div. 695; *Matter of Smith*v. *Republic Pictures Corp.,*144 N. Y. S. 2d 142, affd. 286 App. Div. 1000, motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied 286 App. Div. 1089). However, it is alleged in the petition that a request was made by letter directed to respondent’s secretary that petitioner be sent a complete list of stockholders. The response was that the matter will be brought to the attention of the board of directors at its next meeting. The board met and this item was on its agenda, but no action was taken. In my view, inaction for the period here involved — September 13 to November 18, 1957 — is refusal enough *(People ex rel. Miles*v. *Montreal & Boston Copper Co.,*40 Misc. 282; cf. *People ex rel. Muir*v. *Throop,*12 Wend. 183).

*784The basis for the second ground — that the court is without jurisdiction — is nowhere stated by respondent in its notice of motion or in its several memoranda. I myself can conceive of none, in view of the allegations contained in paragraph *“*2 ” of the petition — that respondent (although a Delaware corporation) has an office in New York City, that its stock is listed and traded on a stock exchange in New York City, that its sole agent for the transfer of its stock is located in New York City, that the sole registrar for its stock is located in New York City, and that in the last year and more most of its directors’ meetings have been held in New York City (see *Matter of Newmark*v. *C. & C. Super Corp.,*3 A D 2d 823, affd. 3 N Y 2d 790; *Matter of Lavin*v. *J. C. Lavin Co.,*264 App. Div. 205).

The cross motion to dismiss is denied, with leave to respondent to answer the petition within five days after service of the copy of the order hereon with notice of entry.
To the Board of Directors of Paramount Energy Operating Company

as Administrator of Paramount Energy Trust





We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of:

•

our audit report dated March 6, 2007 on the consolidated balance sheets of Paramount Energy Trust as at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidatedstatements of earnings and deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2006,

•

our audit report on the reconciliation to United States GAAP dated March 7, 2007,

•

our Comments by Auditors for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting Differences, dated March 7, 2007,

•

our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 7, 2007 on Managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,

each of which is contained in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Trust for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.



Signed KPMG LLP



Chartered Accountants

Calgary, Canada

March 13, 2007
#### Ex parte MOORE.

No. 26321.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 25, 1953.

No attorney on appeal.

Henry Wade, Criminal Dist. Atty., William Alexander and Charles S..Potts, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is an extradition case.

Relator in the court below,, appellant here, is under'arrest by virtue of the executive warrant of the Governor of this State upon the requisition of the Governor of the State of Wisconsin, where relator stands charged by complaint with the. crime of selling mortgaged property.

By writ of habeas corpus before the Judge of the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, relator sought his discharge from such arrest and custody. After hearing, the relief prayed for was denied. Hence this appeal.

The requisition and accompanying papers were in all things sufficient to warrant the Governor of this State to honor the demand and issue his executive warrant. In addition thereto, witnesses from the State of Wisconsin identified relator not only as th.e person charged with the alleged crime but as the guilty party.

If we understand relator’s contention, it is that he was not furnished with copies of a complete set of the instruments accompanying the requisition, as provided by Section 3 of art. 1008a, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P., known as the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act.

The applicable provisions of said section 3 of said Act read as f ollows: -

> “The indictment, information, or affidavit made before the magistrate must substantially charge the person demanded with having committed a crime under the law of that state; and the copy of indictment, information, affidavit, judgment of conviction or sentence must be authenticated by *104the Executive Authority making the demand; provided, however, that all such copies - of the afofesaid instruments shall he in duplicate, one complete set of such instruments to be delivered to the , defendant or to his attorney.”

This provision of the statute is directory only, and becomes mandatory only when request has been made -by the alleged fugitive for the -copies of the instruments mentioned.

As we understand the instant record, relator was, upon his request, furnished the copies of the instruments mentioned. The provisions of the statute were therefore complied with. ,

The governor of the asylum state is 'not required to grant a hearing to the alleged fugitive before recognizing the requisition and issuing this executive warrant (22 Am.Jur., Extradition, -Sec. 44, p. 281), but may do so at his discretion.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-573-000]

Take notice that on September 27, 2000, Southern Natural Gas Company, as successor-in-interest to South Georgia Natural Gas Company (Southern Natural), tendered for filing a report of refunds totaling $551,679 to true up fuel over and under collection for the 15-month period ending July 31, 2000. These refunds are allocated among all shippers based on deliveries for the same 15-month period.

Southern Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to all shippers and interested state commissioners for the South Georgia facilities.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before October 11, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-25848  Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
----

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**STOCKERYALE, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of StockerYale, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark W. Blodgett, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

- (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  
- (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of the Company. 

This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgatedunder the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this Certification (A) shall not be deemed"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filingunder the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

| Date: August 16, 2004 | Name:  | /s/ Mark W. Blodgett                       |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Mark W. Blodgett                           |
|                  |   |                                       |
|                  | Title: | Chairman and       Chief Executive Officer |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to StockerYale, Inc. and will be retained by      StockerYale, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Exhibit 32.1  /  STKR   END2004 Form 10-Q
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 24739.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 5, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is murder without malice; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

*521The record is Ibefore us without a statement of facts or hills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Opinion approved 'by the Court.
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on
our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Michael Benstock         
|Michael Benstock             
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
|                             
|/s/ Andrew D. Demott, Jr.    
|Andrew D. Demott, Jr.        
|Executive Vice President,    
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
|                             
|Date: April 21, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

The notes to the condensed  consolidated  financial  statements  are an integral
part of such statements and the condensed  consolidated financial informtaion in
this schedule. Figures below are in thousands, except per-share data.

</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-03-2000
<CASH>                                           3,851
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,806
<INVENTORY>                                    106,521
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               246,693
<PP&E>                                         116,577
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 337,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,052
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,237
<OTHER-SE>                                     233,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   337,421
<SALES>                                        151,663
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151,663
<CGS>                                           96,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   722
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,062
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,575
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,487
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,487
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CA-650-1430-01; CALA014410]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Road closure. 

# SUMMARY:

Temporary Closure of Road to ensure public safety and continued reliability of the First Los Angeles Aqueduct until the required emergency maintenance and rehabilitation of the Aqueduct is completed. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 20, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peter Graves, Ridgecrest Field Office, BLM, 300 South Richmond Road, Ridgecrest, CA 93555, (760) 384-5429. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Bureau of Land Management, Ridgecrest Field Office hereby announces that the road between Grapevine Canyon and Sand Canyon will be temporarily closed effective October 9, 2000 to July 31, 2001. This action is taken pursuant to Title 43 Code of Federal Regulations part 8364. The reason for the closure is to ensure public safety and the continued reliability of the First Los Angeles Aqueduct until the Los Angeles Department of Water & Power (LADWP) completes emergency repairs and rehabilitation to the Aqueduct. Access on the subject road is prohibited without the express written consent of LADWP. Access across the road may be arranged by calling Robert Chaney of LADWP at (661)-824-7901. For more information, contact Peter G. Graves, Resource Management Specialist, at (760) 384-5429. 

Dated: October 5, 2000. 

Hector A. Villalobos,

Field Office Manager.

[FR Doc. 00-27026 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MOSES ALVAREZ,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-11-00160-CR

Appeal from

432nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 1126294D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

Antcliff, J., not participating