alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40494

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JORGE LUIS GUTIERREZ-QUINTANILLA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:06-CR-121-ALL

Before SMITH, STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Luis Gutierrez-Quintanilla (Gutierrez) appeals his sentence on

remand following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry in violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1326. The district court determined that Gutierrez’s second state law

conviction for possession of marijuana qualified as an “aggravated felony” under

U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 5, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40494

2

Gutierrez contends that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Lopez

v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47 (2006), and because the Government did not satisfy the

procedural requirements of 21 U.S.C. § 851, his second state law conviction does

not qualify for an aggravated felony enhancement. We recently rejected the

same arguments in United States v. Cepeda-Rios, 530 F.3d 333, 334-36 (5th Cir.

2008).

Gutierrez also argues that district court’s ruling is contrary to the

legislative intent of Congress and the Sentencing Commission, but this

argument is also unavailing in light of Cepeda-Rios. See id. at 335 (discussing

Congressional intent in adopting relevant statutory provisions); § 2L1.2,

comment. (n.3(A)) (adopting the definition of “aggravated felony” contained in

8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43) for purposes of § 2L1.2).

AFFIRMED.
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Alaska Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Alaska Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2      | 1,057  | 719   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1,091  | 154    | 2,225  | 306    | 907    | 523    | 185    | 718    | 796    | 227   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,065  | 795    | 177    | 679    | 244    | 562    | 202    | 1,809  | 169    | 3,577 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 300    | 233    | 141    | 427    | 632    | 293    | 2,853  | 2,147  | 184    | 1,868 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 622    | 928    | 752    | 153    | 266    | 76     | 844    | 3,178  | 2,067  | 1,030 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 17     | 67,355 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

of

Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Terence P. Delaney, Interim Chief Financial Officer of Sunoco, Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Sunoco, Inc.



|                  |  |  |  |                                
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Terence P. Delaney         
|                  |  |  |  | Terence P. Delaney             
|                  |  |  |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.****4**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Robert Y. Newell, certify that;

 

1.     I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Dextera Surgical Inc.; and 

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 

|  

Date: October 27, 2017 | /s/ Robert Y. Newell                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           | Robert Y. Newell

Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

(Principal Financial Officer) |
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00468

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022

- 005474

- 1

Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### S HAVAUN 

### S MILEY 

### , Appellant

V



### .

5644 R IVERWALK 

### , LLC , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On May 17, 2023, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the
appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dis miss
the appeal for want of prosecution unless , within ten days, appellant filed with the

court a n appellant ’ s brief and a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the
brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered : June 22, 2023
Exhibit 32

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Jae Whan
Yoo and Lonny D. Robinson hereby certify as follows:

1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of Center Financial Corporation.

2. The Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Center Financial Corporation for
the year ended December 31, 2009 complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Center Financial Corporation.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 7, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jae Whan Yoo                                 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Jae Whan Yoo                                     
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: April 7, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Lonny D. Robinson                            
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Lonny D. Robinson                                
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | and Chief Accounting Officer
... 

# t<.ECEIVEO JUN
- 

### 6

## 2012 

# HEARING DOCKET

FEDERALAVIATION ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHJNGTON, D.C.

In the Matter ofDiamond

### Air Charter, Inc. FAA DocketNo. CPIOEA0004 DMS No. FAA-2010-0620 Judge Sullivan AGENCY'S SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by counsel, and hereby submits its procedural schedule. Counsel for Respondent has indicated that he concurs in this proposed schedule, which contains the following deadlines: September 1, 2012: Filing discovery requests. October 1, 2012: Filing discovery responses. November 1, 2012: Witness list/Evdientiary Exchange due date December 1, 2012: Dispositive motions: December 16, 2012: Answer to dispositive motion December 26, 2012: Reply of moving party February 3, 2013: Telcon re dispositive motion March 3, 2013: Filing pre-hear briefApril 2013-Hearing. 

### Respectfully submitted, AlfredR.**Johnso~** Jr. 

### Regional CoWISel

## ~ 

# s( ? I (

# (?., By:

# Zachary~ U Attorney Federal AviationAdministration 1Aviation Plaza 

### Jamaica, NY 11434 718 553-3258 718 995-5699

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency's Submission of Proposed Procdural Schedule has been sentviafirst class mail and e-mail to the following: Gregory S. Winton Aviation Law Experts , LLC One Research Court, Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850 Email: Greg@AviationLawExperts.Com
The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Judge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 Washington, DC 20590 Email: Diane.Mays@DOT.GOV I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency's Submission of Proposed Procedural Schedule has been sentvia first class mail to the following: Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWrightBuilding, Suite 2W1000 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Room924A Washington, D.C. 20591

Date: 

### JUN - 1 2012



### ------

# ~'d-{_ · saHooks Paralegal Specialist Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434
3
|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of                the Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/              Angelo Luca             |   |   |        |
| Angelo                LucaVice-President |   |   |        |

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Thomas S. Smith, President and a Director of Superior Silver Mines, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  November 4, 2010

By:    /s/ Thomas S. Smith

Thomas S. Smith, President and Director



---
Page | 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00571-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00572-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00573-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00574-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00575-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00576-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00577-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00578-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00579-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00580-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00581-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00582-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00583-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00584-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00585-ADA

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE REGARDING 

EXCHANGE OF PROPOSED CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s Version 3.2 of the Court’s Order Governing proceedings entered 

November 9, 2020, and in accordance with the Court’s Scheduling Order, Plaintiff hereby notifies 

the Court Plaintiff has served its proposed claim constructions on Defendant Google LLC via 

electronic mail on January 8, 2021.

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 35 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 2
Page | 2

DATED: January 8, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Mark D. Siegmund_____ 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered 

electronically via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, 

on this the 8th day of January 2021.

/s/ Mark D. Siegmund

Mark D. Siegmund

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 35 Filed 01/08/21 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                            4264
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 10091258
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                   12018446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              23092883
<PP&E>                                        23670014
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1109744 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                48463033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         21090216
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       2500000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    15334199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  48463033
<SALES>                                       29149561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              30511396
<CGS>                                         26021795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 27031999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                399518
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              610686
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3479397
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1322170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2157227
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2157227
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

October 24, 20 22

No. 04

- 22

- 00312

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.R.P

. , a Child

From the 225th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021

- PA

- 00799 Honorable Kimberly Burley , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On October 17, 2022, appellant filed a petition for review in the Texas Supreme Court. Later that same day, appellant filed a motion for rehearing in this court. “A party may not file a motion for reheari ng or en banc consideration in the court of appeals after that party has filed a petition for review in the Supreme Court unless the court of appeals modifies its opinion or judgment after the petition for review is filed.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.11. According ly, appellant’s motion for rehearing is DENIED

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.3.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 24th da y of October, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26661]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0394]


Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 
(44 U.S.C., 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Veterans 
Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs, has 
submitted the collection of information abstracted below to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA 
submission describes the nature of the information collection and its 
expected cost and burden; it includes the actual data collection 
instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 16, 2000.
    For Further Information or a Copy of the Submission Contact: Denise 
McLamb, Information Management Service (045A4), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8030 
or FAX (202) 273-5981. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0394.''

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Certification of School Attendance--REPS, VA Form 21-8926.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0394.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Abstract: VA Form 21-8926, Certification of School Attendance--REPS 
is used to verify that an individual who is receiving REPS benefits 
based on schoolchild status is in fact enrolled full-time in an 
approved school and is otherwise eligible for continued benefits. The 
program pays VA benefits to certain surviving spouses and children of 
veterans who died in service prior to August 13, 1981 or who died as a 
result of a service-connected disability incurred or aggravated prior 
to August 13, 1981.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published on July 14, 2000 at page 43838.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 300 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,200.
    Send comments and recommendations concerning any aspect of the 
information collection to VA's Desk Officer, OMB Human Resources and 
Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, 
DC 20503 (202) 395-7316. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0394'' 
in any correspondence.

    Dated: September 22, 2000.

    By direction of the Acting Secretary.
Donald L. Neilson,
Director, Information Management Service.
[FR Doc. 00-26661 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6164

CHRISTOPHER SHAWN BOLLING,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:17-cv-00298-GEC-RSB)

Submitted: June 14, 2018 Decided: June 19, 2018

Before TRAXLER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Shawn Bolling, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Shawn Bolling seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief 

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. 

The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner 

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district 

court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When 

the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both 

that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bolling has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED