alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,600 and NAFTA-03998]

                    By letter of September 25, 2000 the petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance, applicable to petition numbers TA-W-37,600 and NAFTA 03998, respectively. The denial notices were signed on August 16, 2000 and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 12, 2000 (65 FR 55049 and 55050, respectively).                

The petitioner provided additional information about imports of coal cars which should have been considered by the Department in its survey of customers.

###  Conclusion

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC this 4th day of October 2000.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-26729 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<PAGE>
                                                  EXHIBIT 18.1
November 12, 1997



Sequa Corporation
Three University Plaza
Hackensack, New Jersey  07601

Re:  Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended September 30, 1997

Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K
calling for a letter from a registrant's independent accountants
whenever there has been a change in accounting principle or
practice.

We have been informed that, as of July 1, 1997, the Company
changed from the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method of accounting
for certain inventories to the first-in, first-out method. 
According to the management of the Company, this change was made
to conform all non-contract inventories to the same method of
valuation and to reduce the costs incurred in administering the
current LIFO system.  The accounting change had an immaterial
impact on the financial position and results of operations of the
Company.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards
for determining the preferability of accounting principles among
acceptable alternative principles has not been established by the
accounting profession.  Thus, we cannot make an objective
determination of whether the change in accounting described in
the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method.  However, we
have reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to
financial reporting, in this particular case on a subjective
basis, and our opinion stated below is based on our determination
made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of
accounting is to an acceptable alternative method of accounting,
which, based upon the reasons stated for the change and our
discussions with you, is also preferable under the circumstances
in this particular case.  In arriving at this opinion, we have
relied on the business judgment and business planning of your
management.

We have not audited the application of this change to the
financial statements of any period subsequent to December 31,
1996.  Further, we have not examined and do not express any
opinion with respect to your financial statements for the nine
months ended September 30, 1997.


Very truly yours,

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
May 25, 2001 

### Before
Hon . F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK , Circuit Judge 

### Hon . K ENNETH F. R IPPLE , Circuit Judge 

### Hon . ANN C LAIRE W ILLIAMS , Circuit Judge

UNITED S TATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff-Appellee , 

### No . 00-3895 v. L ITTO P EREZ , Defendant-Appellant . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 00 CR 301 Milton I. Shadur, Judge .

Order The opinion of this court dated April 16, 2001 is amended as follows: Page 2, first full paragraph, line 4, the cite should be “65 Fed. Reg. 66,792 (Nov. 7, 2000).”
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:                     | /s/ David      G.P. Allan        |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    | David      G.P. Allan                                               |
|                    | Chairman      and CEO                                          |
| September      24, 2009 |

----
EXHIBIT 13.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Nevada Geothermal Power, Inc., a company organized under the British Columbia Company Act (the Company), on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Don J. A. Smith, Secretary/CFO of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and result of operations

of the Company.



/s/ Don J. A. Smith

Secretary/CFO





Date: January 12, 2006
#### AKLES v. STATE.

No. 26264.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 18, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful transportation of beer in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $500.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### COMMONWEALTH ex rel. KECK, Commissioner of Highways, v. SHOUSE.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 18, 1952.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., C. J. Waddill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Jo M. Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. D. Ruark, County Atty., Morganfield, for appellant.

King & 'Craig, Henderson, for appellee.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the Commonwealth's petition after a demurrer had been sustained thereto in an action against an adjoining property owner for cutting trees on a highway right of way. The Commonwealth contends that the petition stated a cause of action. We concur in this view.

The land on which the trees were cut was acquired by the Commonwealth for the purpose of constructing Highway 60 through Union County. The deed provided that the land should revert to the grantors in case it ceased to be used as a highway. Subsequent to the construction of Highway 60 the appellee acquired title to the adjoining property. A row of trees was planted along the highway within approximately one foot of the appellee’s land. The roots and the limbs of the trees extended over on the appellee’s land. The appellee cut down 19 of the trees, claiming that they were depleting his property. The Commonwealth then filed the action seeking to recover $1,000 for the destruction of the trees.

It has been pointed out by this Court frequently in such cases that the abutting landowneK has title to the center of the highway; that he has the right of reasonable ingress and egress; and that he may make reasonable use of the soil so long as it does not interfere with the full enjoyment of the easement acquired by the public. Town of LaGrange v. Overstreet, 141 Ky. 43, 132 S.W. 169, 31 L.R.A.,N.S., 951; Goodloe v. City of Richmond, 250 Ky. 608, 63 S.W.2d 785 and cases cited therein.

Among other things, KRS 433.750 provides that anyone who cuts trees from a highway right of way without first having obtained permission in writing from the engineer having charge of the maintenance of the highway shall be subjected to a fine. The statute makes no exception for an adjoining property owner.

It may well be said that trees form an integral part of a modern highway. They *442serve useful as well as ornamental purposes. The legislature lias declared wisely that they shall not be subject to indiscriminate destruction. California has a statute similar to KRS 433.750. In the case of Santa Barbara County v. More, 175 Cal. 6, 164 P. 895, L.R.A. 1917F, 385, it was held that an adjoining property owner could not remove trees from the highway right of way even though he had planted them.

It is true that KRS 433.750 is a penal statute, but KIRS 446.070 provides that any person who has sustained damages because of the violation of a statute by another may recover from the offender. KRS 446.010 provides that the word “person” may extend and be applied to bodies politic.

Judgment reversed with directions to set it aside and for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
#### FORTUNE v. STATE.

No. 25685.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 30, 1952.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Justin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The penalty assessed is a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear to be in regular form.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                               J. CREW GROUP, INC.


                               State of         Name Under Which
Name of Subsidiary             Incorporation    Subsidiary Does Business
------------------             -------------    ------------------------

J. Crew Operating Corp.        Delaware         J. Crew Operating Corp.
J. Crew Inc.                   New Jersey       J. Crew Inc.
Clifford & Wills, Inc.         New Jersey       Clifford & Wills, Inc.
Grace Holmes, Inc.             Delaware         (J. Crew Retail Stores)
H.F.D. No. 55, Inc.            Delaware         (J. Crew Factory Outlet Stores)
C & W Outlet, Inc.             New York         C & W Outlet, Inc.
J. Crew International, Inc.    Delaware         J. Crew International, Inc.
J. Crew Services, Inc.         Delaware         J. Crew Services, Inc.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5667 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil 

(Bromacil). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6- 

methyluracil (Bromacil). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 5-BROMO-3-SEC-BUTYL-6-METHYLURACIL 

4 (BROMACIL). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 5-Bromo-3-sec-butyl-6- 

methyluracil (Bromacil) 

(CAS No. 314–40–9) (provided for in subheading 

2933.59.18) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5667 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 35.1

Annual Servicer Compliance Certificate

pursuant to

Section 3.9 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement

and

Item 1123 of
Regulation AB





USAA AUTO OWNER TRUST 2016-1





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of USAA
Federal Savings Bank, as servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 21, 2016 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time,
the Sale and Servicing Agreement), by and among USAA Auto Owner Trust 2016-1, USAA Acceptance, LLC, the Servicer and U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout such period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this 28th day of March, 2018.



/s/ Thomas CianelliName: Thomas CianelliTitle:   Senior Vice President, Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 200 (Monday, October 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26538]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Findings of Scientific Misconduct

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research Integrity 
(ORI) and the Assistant Secretary for Health have taken final action in 
the following case:
    Randall P. French, Ph.D., Fox Chase Cancer Center: Based on the 
report of an investigation conducted by the Fox Chase Cancer Center 
(FCCC) and additional analysis conducted by ORI in its oversight 
review, the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) finds that Dr. French, 
postdoctoral associate, FCCC, engaged in scientific misconduct by 
fabricating published research supported by National Cancer Institute 
(NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grants T32 CA09035 and P30 
CA06927.
    Specifically, Dr. French fabricated research results published in 
Developmental Biology 217:62-76, 2000, by falsely claiming in the text 
and Table 1 that he had assayed mouse embryos transgenic for a modified 
DNA construct (cG5/lacZ-F) for a study on the expression of cGATA-5 
transcription factor during heart development in mice. An erratum 
replacing the fabricated data was published by the authors in 
Developmental Biology 223:463, 2000.
    Dr. French has accepted the PHS finding and has entered into a 
Voluntary Exclusion Agreement with PHS in which he has voluntarily 
agreed for a period of three (3) years, beginning on September 28, 
2000:
    (1) To exclude himself from serving in any advisory capacity to 
PHS, including but not limited to service on any PHS advisory 
committee, board, and/or peer review committee;
    (2) That any institution that submits an application for PHS 
support for a research project on which Dr. French's participation is 
proposed or that uses Dr. French in any capacity on PHS supported 
research, or that submits a report of PHS-funded research in which Dr. 
French is involved, must concurrently submit a plan for supervision of 
his duties to the funding agency for approval. The supervisory plan 
must be designed to ensure the scientific integrity of Dr. French's 
research contribution. The institution must also submit a copy of the 
supervisory plan to ORI.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Division of Investigative 
Oversight, Office of Research Integrity, 5515 Security Lane, Suite 700, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 443-5330.

Chris Pascal,
Director, Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. 00-26538 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-P
Exhibit 31.3



CERTIFICATION





I, Bernard A. Hausen, M.D., Ph.D., certify that;



1.     I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Cardica, Inc.; and



2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                       | /s/ Bernard A. Hausen                                                                                                              
|---------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 28, 2014 |                                                                                                                                    
|                       | Bernard A. Hausen, M.D., Ph.D.
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Medical
Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT99(B)

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION ANNUALCOMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

I, John Weisickle, do hereby certifythat I am the Vice President/Finance of American Honda FinanceCorporation, a California corporation (the"Company"), and further certify on behalf ofthe Company in its capacity as servicer (the"Servicer") under the Sale and ServicingAgreement (the "Agreement") dated as of July1, 2002 among the Servicer, American Honda Receivables Corp., asSeller, Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as OwnerTrustee of Honda Auto Receivables 2002-3 Owner Trust and U.S. BankNational Association, as Indenture Trustee asfollows:

|           |                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (i)  | A review of the activities ofthe Servicer during the twelve month period ended March 31, 2005, andof its performance under the Agreement has been made under mysupervision; |

|            |                                                                                                                                                                  |
|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (ii)  | To the best of my knowledgeand information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled allits obligations under the Agreement throughout such period;and |

|             |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (iii)  | To the best of my knowledge andinformation, no Event of Default nor any event which with the giving ofnotice or lapse of time, or both, would become an Event of Defaultunder the Agreement, has occurred or is continuing. |

Thiscertificate is being delivered to the Trustee pursuant to Section 3.11of the Sale and Servicing Agreement effective July 1, 2002, which termsand conditions are incorporated in the Agreement.

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of June,2005.

/s/ John Weisickle Name: JohnWeisickle Title: Vice President/Finance

----
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew Roth, the President of RTR, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the  Company for the fiscal year ended
September  30, 2002 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 8, 2003

/s/ Andrew Roth
--------------------------
Andrew Roth
President




                                       15