alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5491 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5491

  To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain viscose rayon 
                                 yarn.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Mr. Rothman of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain viscose rayon 
                                 yarn.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN VISCOSE RAYON YARN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.54.03 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to single yarn of viscose 
rayon, untwisted or with a twist not exceeding 120 turns/m) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 16

- 2692

_____________

THEODORE HAYES;

AQEELA FOGLE,

Appellants

v.

PHILIP E. HARVEY

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eas tern District of Pennsylvania

District Court No . 2

- 15

- cv

- 02617

District Judge: The Honorable Nitza I. Quinones Alejandro

ORDER SUR PETITION

FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Present: SMITH, Chief Judge , McKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN

HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE,

RESTREPO, BIBAS, and FISHER ∗

, Circuit Judges

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above

captioned case, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The Clerk of

this Court shal l list the case for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the Court. The

opinion and judgment entered October 18, 2017 are hereby vacated.

BY THE COURT,

s/ D. Brooks Smith

C hief Judge

Dated: December 29, 2017

∗ Will participate as a member of the en banc court pursuant to 3d Cir. I.O.P. 9.6.4

.tmm/cc: All Counsel of Record
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of St. Joseph, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John H. Simmons, as
President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

            (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date:  January 4, 2005

/s/ John H. Simmons
-----------------------------------------
John H. Simmons
President and Principal Executive Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-77,090

RUBEN GUTIERREZ, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM THE COURT’S ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

RECALL ORDER SETTING EXECUTION DATE AND WARRANT OF

EXECUTION FILED IN CAUSE NO. 98-CR-1391-A

IN THE 107 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

TH

CAMERON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

This is a direct appeal of the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to recall

the order setting an execution date and warrant of execution filed in the 107 Judicial

th

District Court of Cameron County, Cause No. 98-CR-1391-A styled The State of Texas

v. Ruben Gutierrez. Appellant has acknowledged that he cannot appeal this order and has

“withdraw[n] his notice of appeal related to this matter filed in the trial court September
Gutierrez – 2

19, 2019.” The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Do not publish

Delivered: October 11, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO

______________________________________

MELODY JOY CANTU AND DR. RODRIGO 

CANTU,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DR. SANDRA GUERRA AND DIGITAL 

FORENSICS CORPORATION, LLC,

Defendants.

5:20-CV-0746 JKP – HJB

______________________________________

NOTICE OF INTENT TO TAKE ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF 

DR. SANDRA GUERRA

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP-HJB Document 91 Filed 07/14/22 Page 1 of 4
1

NOTICE OF INTENT TO TAKE THE ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED 

DEPOSITION OF DR. SANDRA GUERRA

TO: Dr. Sandra Guerra, by and through her counsel of record Ricardo G. Cedillo, Email: 

rcedillo@lawdcm.com and Brandy Peery, Email: bpeery@lawdcm.com, DAVIS, 

CEDILLO & MENDOZA, INC. 755 E. Mulberry, Suite 250, San Antonio, Texas 78212.

Please take notice that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30 and the Scheduling 

Order Dkt. 89, regarding the discovery period, Plaintiffs Melody Joy Cantu and Dr. Rodrigo 

Cantu, intent to take the oral and/or videotaped deposition of Defendant, DR. SANDRA 

GUERRA, before a notary public pr some other officer authorized by law to administer oaths, at 

9:00 a.m. on Thursday, July 21, 2022, by remote means via a videoconferencing platform.

The deposition, when taken, may continue from day to day until completed, and will be 

taken by stenographic means and videoconferencing examination with the answers to be used in 

the final trial of the above-styled and numbered cause. You are invited to have counsel present 

for purposes of cross-examination.

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP-HJB Document 91 Filed 07/14/22 Page 2 of 4
2

NOTICE OF INTENT TO TAKE THE ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED 

DEPOSITION OF DR. SANDRA GUERRA

Dated: July 14, 2022 Stipulated and respectfully submitted,

/s/ Tor Ekeland

Tor Ekeland (NY Bar No. 4493631)

Pro Hac Vice

Tor Ekeland Law, PLLC

30 Wall Street, 8th Floor

New York, NY 

t: (718) 737 - 7264

f: (718) 504 - 5417

tor@torekeland.com

and

/s/ Rain Levy Minns

Rain Minns

State Bar No. 24034581

Minns Law Firm, P.C.

d/b/a Rain Minns Law Firm

4412 Spicewood Springs Rd., Suite 500

Austin, Texas 78759-8583

Tel.: 512-372-3222

Fax: 512-861-2403

rain@rainminnslaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs Melody Joy Cantu 

and Dr. Rodrigo Cantu

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP-HJB Document 91 Filed 07/14/22 Page 3 of 4
3

NOTICE OF INTENT TO TAKE THE ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED 

DEPOSITION OF DR. SANDRA GUERRA

Certificate of Service

I certify that on this 14th of July 2022, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was electronically 

filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send electronic 

notification of such filing to the parties on record.

/s/ Tor Ekeland

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP-HJB Document 91 Filed 07/14/22 Page 4 of 4
#### Ex parte CARROLL.

No. 24307.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 12, 1949.

*581GRAVES, Judge.

Relator was held under a warrant of the Governor of this state as a fugitive from the State of Alabama. Under a writ of habeas corpus before Judge A. P. Mays at Corsicana, he was remanded to the custody of the sheriff to be by him delivered to the agent of the State of Alabama to be taken there to answer a certain criminal accusation. This judgment of the District Judge is here attacked as erroneous.

The recitations set forth in the proclamation of' the Governor of Texas are entitled to be taken as having been shown unless the contrary appears by proof. This proclamation says in substance that it has been made known to the Governor of Texas that relator stands charged by affidavit and warrant of arrest before the proper authorities with a criminal offense and that he has taken refuge in this state and that the Governor of Alabama has demanded that relator be arrested and delivered to the agent to be conveyed to the State of Alabama.

It is contended that the executive warrant is insufficient in that a copy of the affidavit is not attached thereto. We note that the warrant itself sets forth the fact that “said demand is accompanied by copy of said Affidavit and Warrant of Arrest duly ^certified as authentic by the Governor of said State” (Alabama). Therefore, we th(nk that reliance can be had upon the truth of the statement of our Governor that such affidavit and warrant were here present. See Ex parte Noble, Tex.Cr.App., 198 S.W.2d 893; Ex parte Alvey, Tex.Cr.App., 204 S.W.2d 838; Ex parte Wright, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 312, 174 S.W.2d 601, and cases there cited.

Relator claims that he was not a fugitive from Alabama, although his own testimony shows him to have been within such state on September 4, 1948, the date claimed in such affidavit, but that he did not flee therefrom; that he was not guilty, .of the charge preferred against him. .The word “fugitive” as used herein does not import an intentional. flight from a known deed but merely that a person is not present in the home state when wanted to 'answer a criminal accusation. See Ex parte Morris, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 596, 101 S.W.2d 259; Ex parte Beeth, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 511, 154 S.W.2d 484; Ex parte Robertson, Tex.Cr.App., 210 S.W.2d 593. See also *42*Tex.Dig., page 249, and cases there cited.

We find certain hearsay evidence relative to the affidavit accompanying the request of the Governor of Alabama, same being but a statement of a conversation had with an employee of the Texas Secretary of State over the telephone. This being but hearsay and inadmissible for any purpose, the proposition prevails that the learned trial judge did not consider same in this trial before him.

The matters presented herein appear to be regular upon their face, and no irregularity being shown, the sheriff is directed to deliver relator to the agent fo,r the State of Alabama to be there dealt with according to law, and the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------




                                      13
<PAGE>


COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                  CWABS MASTER TRUST, SERIES 2002-A SUBTRUST,
         REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET BACKED NOTES, SERIES 2002-A


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (the "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further
certify pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

      (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
      preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
      under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

      (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
      Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
      throughout such year.




/s/Joseph M. Candelario                         Dated: March 27, 2003

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT
AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER


/s/ Mark Wong                                   Dated: March 27, 2003

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT


                                      14
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

July Term 2014

HENRY PAUL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-647

[September 3, 2014]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara McCarthy, 

Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 10-14696CF10B and 11-4431CF10A.

Henry Paul, Wewahitchka, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Angela E. Noble, 

West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s rule 3.800(a) 

motion to correct illegal sentence. Appellant claims that he received 

consecutive youthful offender sentences which exceed the six-year 

statutory cap and which are illegal under Allen v. State, 526 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 

1988). He also claims that his written sentence is inconsistent with the 

court’s oral pronouncement in some unspecified way. We conclude that 

“review of the record establishes that the defendant did not satisfy the 

burden of showing entitlement to relief on the face of the record.” Johnson 

v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045, 1051 n.2 (Fla. 2011); see also Williams v. State, 

957 So. 2d 600, 604 (Fla. 2007) (holding that the movant has the burden 

of demonstrating an entitlement to relief in a rule 3.800(a) proceeding). 

Affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to file a sworn and 

sufficient rule 3.850 motion within the time remaining under the rule or 

to file a rule 3.800(a) motion that demonstrates an entitlement to relief 

from the face of the record.
2

WARNER, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 99.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Paramount Energy Trust (the Trust) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Susan L. Riddell Rose, President and Chief Executive Officer of Paramount Energy Operating Corp., who performs the same function for the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/Susan L. Riddell Rose

Susan L. Riddell Rose
President and Chief Executive Officer of Paramount Energy Operating Corp.

March 13, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
TRANSMITTING STV GROUP'S THIRD QUARTER 10Q.  PERIOD ENDING 06/30/97.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000095045
<NAME> STV GROUP, INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         360,000
<SECURITIES>                                   889,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,878,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   290,000
<INVENTORY>                                 15,322,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,987,000
<PP&E>                                      11,755,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,304,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,442,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,714,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,921,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,989,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,442,000
<SALES>                                     69,684,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            69,684,000
<CGS>                                       48,269,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,192,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,035,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,190,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   621,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            569,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   569,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

s0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

139698

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139698 COA: 292994 Oakland CC: 1973-017115-FX LEON DOUGLAS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 24, 2009 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Exhibit 4.6





OPTION AMENDMENT AGREEMENT



THIS AGREEMENT dated for reference the 7th day of August, 2002.

BETWEEN

CONTINENTAL RIDGE RESOURCES INC., a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, having its head office at 900 - 409 Granville Street, Vancouver, BC, V6C 1T2;



(KRI)

OF THE FIRST PART

AND

BLUE MOUNTAIN POWER COMPANY INC., a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, having its registered office at 1000 - 840 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2M1;

(BMP)

OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS:

A.

KRI and BMP entered into an Option Agreement dated June 19, 2001, whereby BMP granted KRI the option to earn up to a 60% interest in certain geothermal leases located in Nevada, USA (the Agreement); and

B.

KRI and BMP wish to amend the terms of the Agreement in the manner set forth below. The parties to this Option Amendment Agreement therefore agree:

1.

That the definition of Work Program in sub-section 1.1 (m) of the Agreement be deleted and replaced with the following:

Work Program means exploration expenditures incurred and funded by KRI with respect to the Property including geological, geophysical and geochemical work, drilling and all payments and expenses incurred in connection with keeping the Property in good standing, excluding all exploration expenditures financed by funds provided by the Department of Energy, of the federal government of the United States of America.

2.

That the definition of SHAIF Policy in sub-section 1.1 (1) of the Agreement be deleted and replaced with the following:

Instrument 45-102 means Multilateral Instrument 45-102 Resale of Securities, and any successor instrument.

3.

That all references in the Agreement to "SHAIF Policy" be deleted and replaced with Instrument 45-102.

4.

That the due date of obligations of KRI to make the payment described in sub-section 3.2(a)(ii), and to complete the Work Programs described in sub-section 3.2(b)(i) of the Agreement be extended until December 31, 2002.

5.

Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.







---







IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Option Amendment Agreement as of the day and year first above written



CONTINENTAL RIDGE RESOURCES INC





|                     
|---------------------
|/s/                  
|Authorized Signatory:





BLUE MOUNTAIN POWER COMPANY INC.





|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Brian D. Fairbank
|Authorized Signatory
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Marco Taglietti, certify that:

 

|    |                                                                  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-/A of SCYNEXIS, Inc.; and |

 

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

 

|   | Date: April 28, 2020 |
|--------|----------------------|

|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |
| /s/ Marco Taglietti, M.D.                      |
| Marco Taglietti, M.D.

Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I, James M. Papada, III, Chief Executive Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006 (the “Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Technitrol, Inc. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| Dated:  August 4, 2006 |  | /s/ James M. Papada, III |
|------------------------|--|--------------------------|
|                        |  | James M. Papada, III     |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be retained by Technitrol, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

 

----