alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5733 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5733

   To suspend temporarily the duty on instant print film for analog 
                              photography.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2012

 Mrs. Maloney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on instant print film for analog 
                              photography.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INSTANT PRINT FILM FOR ANALOG PHOTOGRAPHY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Instant print film  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        of a kind used                                                     31/2015.......
                        for analog
                        photography in
                        mirrored reflex
                        cameras for
                        frontal exposure
                        on a negative
                        base (provided
                        for in subheading
                        3701.20.0030)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26616]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL01-1-000]


California Municipal Utilities Association, Complainant

October 11, 2000.
    California Municipal Utilities Association, Complainant, v. All 
Jurisdictional Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services Into The Energy 
and Ancillary Services Markets Operated by the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation and the California Power Exchange; 
California Independent System Operator Corporation; and California 
Power Exchange Corporation, Respondents. San Diego Gas & Electric 
Company, Investigation of Practices of the California Independent 
System Operator and the California Power Exchange, California 
Electricity Oversight Board, Public Meeting in San Diego, California; 
Notice of Complaint
    Take notice that on October 6, 2000, the California Municipal 
Utilities Association submitted a Complaint, Request to Institute Cost-
Base Rates, and Motion To Consolidate. CMUA alleges that the markets 
for energy and ancillary services operated by the California Power 
Exchange Corporation (the PX) and the California Independent System 
Operator Corporation (the ISO) are not workably competitive and that 
the prices in those markets are unjust and unreasonable. Further, CMUA 
requests that the Commission order all sellers into those markets to 
tender cost-based filings, and that the Commission consolidate this 
docket with other dockets captioned above.
    Copies of the filing were served upon the ISO, the PX, and the 
service lists in the above-captioned dockets, and transmitted 
electronically through ISO-compiled electronic mail lists.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before October 26, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the complaint 
shall also be due on or before October 26, 2000.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26616 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
(Note: This tab copied from EPA Tech Analysis PVC Process Vents 02-24-12 EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0037-0202)

MACT Floor - Vinyl Chloride RDL Analysis - ALL FACILITIES

PIVOT - Determine Top 5 Best Performing Sources for Vinyl Chloride (All Subcategories)

HAP

HAP_Cat_Name

Inlet_Outlet

Compound_Std

Control Device

Colocated with with EDC/VCM (0=No,1=Yes)

Compounds via Multiple Test Methods (0= Multiple Results Excluded)

Test Representative of Normal Op. Conditions (Yes=1, 0=No)

Test Included Streams Other Than PVC (0=No, 1=Yes)

Test Included Streams Other Than PVC/VCM/EDC (0=No, 1=Yes)

Exclude Previous Test Data (1=data excluded)

Std Facility

SHTFP

OVLADP

SHTA

FPC DE

FPC TX

POH

POP

Average MDL of Top 5 Best Performing Sources = RDL

3 X RDL = 

Average of yellow cells=

3X RDL =
2002-0037-0202)

HAP

(All)

Outlet

(Multiple Items)

(All)

(All)

0

(All)

(All)

(All)

1

Data

ERG_Method

Run 1 

NonDetect?

Run 2 

NonDetect?

Run 3 

NonDetect?

Run 1 

(ppmvd@3%O2

)

Run 2 

(ppmvd@3%O2

)

EPA 320 1 1 1 0.005 0.005

EPA 18 1 1 1 0.193 0.193

EPA 320 0 0 0 0.343 0.292

EPA 320 1 1 1 0.269 0.232

EPA 18 1 1 1 0 0.44

EPA 18 0 0 0 0.960947368 2.055185185

EPA 18 0 0 0 3.358882353 2.381478261

0.184083333 ppmvd @ 3% O2

0.55225 ppmvd @ 3% O2

0.200818182 ppmvd @ 3% O2

0.602454545 ppmvd @ 3% O2

VI Analysis: EPA's average MDL of the Top 5 is based on the yellow high

cells and the green highlighted cell that had a 0 entry. The 0 entry is a m

there was no data for VC for that run (See tab with VC Data) and that da

should not have been used. When you exclude the 0 entry and just use 

highlighted data, the new average calculates to be 0.201 and 3X DL now 

0.6. See Reference Document " Tech Analysis of PVC Process Vents" Tab 

Analyis EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0037-0202.
RANK

Run 3 

(ppmvd@3%O2

)

Avg 

(ppmvd@3%O2

)

0.005 0.005 1

0.193 0.193 2

0.094 0.243 3

0.234 0.245 4

0.44 0.44 5

3.511809524 2.175980692

2.24824 2.662866871

 Top 5 is based on the yellow highlighted 

t had a 0 entry. The 0 entry is a mistake as 

See tab with VC Data) and that data point 

u exclude the 0 entry and just use the yellow 

culates to be 0.201 and 3X DL now becomes 

Analysis of PVC Process Vents" Tab VC-DL 

.
#### GREEN v. STATE.

No. 22267.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 4, 1942.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 13,1943.

Mel Janes, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in Scurry County, a dry area. Upon a plea of guilty before the court appellant’s punishment was assessed at a fine of $200.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception, in which condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

The record in this cause is the same as in No. 22263, 167 S.W.2d 183, against the same appellant, save that in the present record the precise date of the judgment on appellant’s plea of guilty is not shown. The case was tried at the March term, 1942, of the county court, and the delays in perfecting the record are the same as in No. 22263.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 00-25132) published on page 
58771 of the issue for Monday, October 2, 2000.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City heading, the entry 
for Sturm Financial Group, Inc., Denver, Colorado, is revised to read 
as follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Sturm Financial Group, Inc., Denver, Colorado; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Sturm 
Banks of Colorado, Inc., Denver, Colorado, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Bank of Cherry Creek N.A., Boulder, Colorado, Bank of Cherry 
Creek N.A., Denver, Colorado, Mesa National Bank, Grand Junction, 
Colorado, Western National Bank of Colorado, Colorado Springs, 
Colorado; Sturm Banks of Wyoming, Inc., Denver, Colorado, and thereby 
indirectly acquire American National Bank of Cheyenne, Cheyenne, 
Wyoming, Wyoming Bank & Trust Company N.A., Buffalo, Wyoming, 
Stockgrowers State Bank N.A., Worland, Wyoming, Bank of Laramie N.A., 
Laramie, Wyoming; and Sturm Banks of Kansas City, Inc., Denver, 
Colorado, and thereby indirectly acquire Premier Bank, Lenexa, Kansas.
    In connection with this application, Applicant also has applied to 
acquire Community First Data Services, Inc., Cheyenne, Wyoming, and 
thereby engage in data processing activities, pursuant to 225.28(b)(14) 
of Regulation Y.
    In addition to this application, Sturm Financial Group, Inc., 
Denver, Colorado and Sturm Banks of Kansas City, Inc., Denver, Colorado 
also have applied to engage in lending activities, pursuant to 
225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.
    Comments on this application must be received by October 26, 2000.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 11, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-26541 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 61352)    
                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, September 26, 2000, 12:30 p.m. to September 26, 2000 2:30 p.m., NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 21, 2000, 65 FR 57201-57202.                 

The meeting will be held October 24, 2000, from 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 6, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-26577 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5400 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5400

    To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on p-Toluenesulfonamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Ms. Hochul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on p-Toluenesulfonamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. P-TOLUENESULFONAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        p-                  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Toluenesulfonamid                                                 12/31/2015
                          e (CAS No. 70-55-
                          3) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2935.00.95)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free.

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

8/19/13

Mr. David K. Paylor, Director

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

629 East Main Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

Dear Director Paylor:

On July 26, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the 

Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

(VADEQ) pertaining to the 2013 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards

(NAAQS). EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is 

reviewing it to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice (DFRN) action. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ellen Schmitt, Air 

Program Planning, at (215) 814-5787, or at schmitt.ellen@epa.gov. She is the principal contact for this 

rulemaking. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division 

cc: Mr. Michael G. Dowd, Air Division Director

 Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
#### NICHOLS v. STATE.

No. 23409.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1946.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The unlawful possession of whisky for the purpose of sale in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $100.

Prior to announcing ready for trial, appellant filed a motion for severance, asking that one K. P. Jones — -who was then under separate accusation for an offense growing out of the same transaction as that charged against appellant — be first tried. The motion complied with the statutory prerequisites. Art. 651, C.C.P.

Appellant’s exception to the. action of the trial court in overruling the motion is preserved by a proper *bill*of exception, unqualified and unexplained by the trial court.

Under the facts stated, appellant was entitled to the severance and the motion should have been granted. Willis v. State, 141 Tex.Cr.R. 297, 148 S.W.2d 397.

In the absence of explanatory testimony, we are unable to see the materiality of the figures and notations found in a small book upon appellant’s person after arrest. This suggestion is made in view of another trial.

For the error in overruling the motion for severance, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

Ms. Jennifer Sass, Ph.D. Ms. Mae Wu Natural Resources Defense Council 1200 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20005 Mr. Karl Tupper Pesticide Action NetworkNorth America 49 Powell Street, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94102 OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

Re: Petitions requesting cancellation ofuses ofand revocation oftolerances for endosulfan Dear Ms. Sass, Ms. Wu, and Mr. Tupper: EPA is writingto inform you ofthe Agency's actions taken in relationto the subject matter of your petition, in which you requested thatthe Agency cancel all uses ofthe pesticide endosulfan under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and revoke all Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)tolerances for endosulfan. EPA has addressed yourrequestto cancel endosulfan registrations and to revoke the endosulfan tolerances through the following actions. OnNovember 10, 2010, EPA issued a cancellation order granting requests for voluntary cancellation ofendosulfan registrations. 75 Fed. Reg. 69065 (Nov. 10, 2010). That order laid out a detailed phase-out schedule for the cancellation ofall endosulfan products with various cancellation and stop use dates, the latest date for the final set ofuses beingJuly 31, 2016. Then, on September 14, 2011, EPA issued a final rule establishingrevocation dates for all endosulfan tolerances. 76 Fed. Reg. 56648 (Sept. 14, 2011). Again, the latest revocation date is July 31,2016. Finally, in response to an objection filed concerningthe revocation ofthe tolerance for residues of endosulfan on imported tea, EPAwill be publishing, within the next few weeks, an orderreestablishing a time-limited tolerance for endosulfan residues on tea. Thattime-limited tolerance will be setto expire on July 31,2016.

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled PaperAtthis time, EPA considers your petitionto be addressed. Ifyouhave any further questions, please contact me at 202-564-2892 orhuskey.angela@epa.gov.

cc: Rick Keigwin, OPP Eric Miederhoff, OPP Sincerely,
Ange a Huskey, Attorney Office ofGeneral Counsel Pesticides and Toxic Substances Law Office

2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5660 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5660

      To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Reactive Red 267.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Reactive Red 267.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REACTIVE RED 267.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1,4-                Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Benzenedisulfonic                                                 12/31/2015
                          acid, 2,2'-[(1-
                          methyl-1,2-
                          ethanediyl)bis[im
                          ino(6-fluoro-
                          1,3,5-triazine-
                          4,2-diyl)imino(1-
                          hydroxy-3-sulfo-
                          6,2-
                          naphthalenediyl)a
                          zo]]bis[5-methoxy-
                          , sodium salt
                          (Reactive Red
                          267) (CAS No.
                          155522-07-9)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3204.16.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2737 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 

gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2013 

Mr. LEWIS (for himself, Ms. NORTON, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, 

and Ms. DELAURO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exclusion from gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Segal AmeriCorps 

5 Education Award Tax Relief Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF AMERICORPS 

7 EDUCATIONAL AWARDS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 117 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified scholarships) is 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2737 IH

1 amended by adding at the end the following new sub2 section: 

3 ‘‘(e) AMERICORPS EDUCATIONAL AWARDS.—Gross 

4 income shall not include any national service educational 

5 award described in subtitle D of title I of the National 

6 and Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12601 

7 et seq.).’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.9



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 15D-14B AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Susan L. Riddell Rose, Chief Executive Officer of Paramount Energy Operating Corp. in its capacity as Administrator of Paramount Energy Trust (the "Trust"), hereby certifies, to her knowledge, that the Trusts annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with the exception that the Report has not been timely filed,and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of and for the periods presented.



November 29, 2005

Calgary, Alberta

Per:

(signed by) Susan L. Riddell Rose

Susan L. Riddell Rose

Chief Executive Officer

Paramount Energy Operating Corp.

in its capacity as Administrator of Paramount Energy Trust