alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                            ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

         I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates,
Motorola Debenture-Backed Series 2002-12 Trust (the "Trust"), certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the Trust
         and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing
         reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in respect of
         periods included in the year covered by this annual report of the
         Trust;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
         provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
         under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in
         such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

     4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee
         under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my
         knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has
         fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.



Date: March 26, 2008


/s/ David J. Kolibachuk
--------------------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
#### OWEN v. LONGUEMARE et al.

No. 5061.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

June 3, 1954.

Frank Owen, III, El Paso, in pro per.

Ernest Guinn, El Paso, for Longuemare, et al.

H. T. Faulk, El Paso, for intervenor, Blair.

W. W. Bean, Austin, for intervenor, Escobar.

PER CURIAM.

Relator has filed an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the Chairman of the County Democratic Executive Committee to place his name on the primary ballot for the primary election to be held on July 24th. It is uncontroverted that Relator filed his request to have his name placed on such primary ballot within the time prescribed by law and that he has paid to the Democratic Chairman the assessment required for having his name placed on such ballot. It further appears that the Democratic Chairman has evidenced his intention not to place such name on the primary ballot for the reason that it has been made known to him that the Relator did not file his sworn statement of all gifts, loans and payments made and all debts incurred by him as required by Art. 14.08 of the Election Code, V.A.T.S., at the time therein specified.

Intervenor Anita Blair has intervened in this matter, adopting the Relator’s petition and alleging that she has paid the filing fee as set by law, and filed her application as provided by law.

Intervenor Jose Escobar has filed his petition asking mandamus to now require the County Chairman to place his name on the ballot under the provisions of Article 1312.

In our opinion such Code does not place the responsibility upon the Chairman of the Committee or the Committee, or authorize him or it to determine whether or not Art. 14.08 of the Election Code, V.A.T.S. has been violated, and to refuse to place the same of Relator on the ballot. In our *702opinion the provision of Article 14.09 of the Election Code, V.A.T.S., providing for a quo warranto proceeding to enforce the provisions of the statute is exclusive, and such provision has not been here invoked or complied with.

It Is Therefore Ordered that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue to Charles A. Longuemare, Democratic Chairman, requiring him to place Relator’s name and the name of Intervenor Anita Blair on the primary ballot. It is further ordered that the plea in intervention of Jose Escobar be in all things denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 16, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00110

- CV

Mary MOCZYGEMBA,

Appellant

v.

Thomas J . MOCZYGEMBA and Harry Lee Moczygemba,

Appellee s

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 10

- 0573

- CVW

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

A ppellant Mary Moczygemba’s Motion for En Banc Reconsideration is DENIED.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 23509.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 26, 1947.

Seaberry & Hagman, by Ben. J. Hagman, all of Weatherford, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Sam L. Cleveland, Dist. Atty., of Steph-enville, Attys. for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Judgment in this case was affirmed on December 18, 1946, and motion for rehearing overruled on February 12, 1947. In his motion filed February 19, 1947, appellant calls attention to an error of the trial court in applying the indeterminate sentence statute. Art. 775, C.C.P. Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. art. 775.

Punishment for the offense of failing to stop and render aid, Art. 1150, P.C., is imprisonment in the penitentiary “not to exceed five years or in jail not exceeding one year or by fine not exceeding five thousand dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment.”

In applying the indeterminate sentence statute the trial court directed appellant’s imprisonment in the penitentiary to be not less than one year nor more tiran two years. It should have been for not less than one hour nor more than two years. Bevil v. State, 139 Tex.Cr.R. 513, 141 S.W.2d 362; Martinez v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 434, 128 S.W.2d 398, 131 S.W.2d 971.

Appellant’s motion to correct sentence is. granted, and it is now ordered that the sentence be reformed and corrected to direct that appellant be confined in the penitentiary not less than one hour nor more than two years.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40753

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDUARDO MARQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-02-CR-65-1

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eduardo Marquez (“Marquez”) pled guilty to possession of

cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). He argues that the district court

plainly erred by assigning an initial offense level of 28 for

possession of 1.2 kilograms of cocaine and that the drug type and

quantity provisions of § 841(a) and (b) are unconstitutional

under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).
No. 02-40753

-2-

Though the district court may have failed to properly select

the initial offense level, this court’s rule for correcting

sentencing range errors is clear: even where clear error exists,

the error will not be corrected as plain error if the original

sentence could be imposed on remand. United States v. Leonard,

157 F.3d 343, 346 (5th Cir. 1998). As Marquez concedes, his

second argument is foreclosed by United States v. Slaughter, 238

F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1045

(2001). In the absence of any convincing argument, the sentence

imposed by the district court is AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Annual Report of Midwest Banc Holdings,    Inc. (the “Company”) on    Form 10-K    for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with    the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2008    (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify,    pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted    pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,    that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,    as amended; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.       /s/  James    J. Giancola    Name:   James J. Giancola     Title:         President and    Chief Executive Officer     Date: March 14, 2008       /s/  Jan    R. Thiry    Name:   Jan R. Thiry     Title:         Senior Vice President and    Chief Accounting Officer     Date: March 14, 2008
EXHIBIT 13

Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-21 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 4
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40084

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GILBERTO BERMUDEZ-OLIVAREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-99-CR-383-1

---------------------

August 24, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Gilberto Bermudez-Olivarez

(“Bermudez”) has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant

to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Bermudez was sent

a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a

response. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the

record discloses no nonfrivolous point for appeal. Accordingly,

the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT D

Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-6 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 7
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-6 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 7
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-6 Filed 03/05/21 Page 3 of 7
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-6 Filed 03/05/21 Page 4 of 7
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-6 Filed 03/05/21 Page 5 of 7
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-6 Filed 03/05/21 Page 6 of 7
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 46-6 Filed 03/05/21 Page 7 of 7
Exhibit
10.11


 


NuAxess
2, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Quad M Solutions, Inc., enters

into a Binding Term Sheet with Mammoth Life and ReInsurance LLC . for a Joint Venture;

Definitive Closing Agreements to Follow


 


Quad
M Solutions, Inc., through its wholly owned subsidiary, Nu Axess 2, Inc. (the “Company”), has entered into a Binding Term
Sheet with Mammoth Life and ReInsurance LLC (“Mammouth”). Pursuant to the Binding Term Sheet, the Company is to receive 60
% and Mammoth is to receive 40 % of the stop loss captive underwriting profitability of all Quad M and its subsidiaries’ business
that Quad M brings to Mammoth throughout the prior year. For example, all revenue coming from any business conducted between the two
companies less referral fees given to mammoth, and prior to any reinsurance fees given to mammoth less operating expense and less medical
claims.


 


Quad
M Solutions, Inc. will contract with Mammoth Life and ReInsurance LLC. to be either a full or partial stop loss provider and group life
insurance provider to Quad M Solutions, Inc. and subsidiary’s insurance plans.


 


Mammoth
shall be paid NuAxess’s standard referral rate for new business.


 


Signatures


 


	/s/:
    Joseph Frontiere, CEO	 	/s/:
    Paul Ford, CEO
	Quad
    M Solutions Inc.	 	Mammoth
    Life and Reinsurance LLC


 


Dated:
September 25, 2021
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
2-74613 on Form S-16 and No. 33-66474 on Form S-8 of EnergySouth, Inc. (the
"Company"), as successor to Mobile Gas Service Corporation, and No. 333-02271 on
Form S-3 of the Company, of our report dated November 2, 2000 (December 20, 2000
as to Note 10), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended September 30, 2000.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
December 29, 2000
#### O’NEAL v. STATE.

No. 23861.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 17, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Cfi. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., both of Houston, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is an assault with intent to rape. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 30 years. ' • '

The record is before us without any bills of exception or statements of facts.. The indictment appears to be in- due form. Consequently, there is nothing presented! for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court
**EXHIBIT 32.1  **

**STOCKERYALE, INC.    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

        In connection with the Annual Report of StockerYale,    Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark W. Blodgett,    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
(2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K   ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with   clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this Certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject   to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or   the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Date: May 14, 2004Name:/s/ Mark W. Blodgett      Mark W. Blodgett        Title:Chairman andChief Executive Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to StockerYale, Inc. and will be retained by StockerYale, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Exhibit 32.1  /  STKR   END2004 Form 10-Q
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                       1,331,107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,090,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                    53,445
<INVENTORY>                                  3,372,923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,975,964
<PP&E>                                       4,427,708
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,133,166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,117,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,232,388
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       127,370
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,757,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,117,180
<SALES>                                      9,139,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,139,532
<CGS>                                        3,818,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,340,395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,121,004)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (280,205)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (840,799)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (840,799)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.66)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40359 Summary Calendar
JOHNNY CRAWFORD, JR Plaintiff-Appellee v. DOUG DRETKE Defendants-Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas,

Corpus Christi USDC No. 2:04-CV-335 Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * For reasons explained by the United States Supreme Court in Johnson v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304, 319-20 (1995), we dismiss this appeal for lack ofappellate jurisdiction. DISMISSED

. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D February 11, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, SPORES.
    Date: October 25-27, 2000.
    Time: 8 AM to 6 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Georgetown, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: Brian E. Wojcik, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 8019, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/402-2785.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 12, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-26854 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**PROMISSORY
        NOTE**
 TO
 MRS.
        PHYLLIS L. BELL
 
 
 $40,000.00
              January
                  6, 2005
 
 
 For
        value
        received, **STAF
        TEK SERVICES, INC.,** of
        Tulsa,
        Oklahoma, (herein referred to as ‘maker’) promises to pay to the order of **PHYLLIS
        L. BELL** ,
        (herein
        referred to as ‘payee’) on or before January 31, 2005, the principal sum of
        Forty Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($40,000.00), plus twelve and one-half
        percent
        (12 1⁄2%) interest annually from this date to the maturity date of January 31,
        2005.
 
 Payment
        of this note shall be as follows: One lump sum payment of $40,000 plus $342.50
        interest, totaling $40,342.50.
 
 Maker
        may
        prepay this note in whole or in part without penalty or surcharge at any
        time
        prior to the maturity date.
 
 The
        maker
        hereby severally waives presentment for payment, notice of nonpayment, protest
        and notice to protest, and aggress that extensions of the time for payment
        may
        be granted without notice. In case of legal proceedings to collect this note,
        maker agrees to pay all court costs including reasonable attorneys’ fees to
        payee as prevailing parties in the suit.
 
 IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is signed this 6 th day of
        January, 2005.
 
 
 /s/
                  John H. SimmonsJohn
                  H. Simmons, President, C.E.O.StafTek
                  Services, Inc.4870
                  S. Lewis St., Ste. 250Tulsa,
                  Oklahoma 74105