1

MINISTERIO DE LA PRODUCCIÓN 

(MINISTRY OF PRODUCTION) 

SECRETARIA DE AGRICULTURA, GANADERIA, PESCA Y ALIMENTOS 

(SECRETARIAT OF AGRICULTURE, LIVESTOCK, FISHERIES AND FOODSTUFFS) 

SERVICIO NACIONAL DE SANIDAD Y CALIDAD AGROALIMENTARIA 

(NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND AGRIFOOD QUALITY SERVICE) 

SENASA 

INFORMATION PROVIDED BY SENASA TO ATTAIN 

RECOGNITION OF ARGENTINA ́S PATAGONIA AS A REGION, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 92.2, TITLE 9, OF THE 

CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS FOR 

FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE (FMD) 

REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA 

July 2003 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

2

NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND AGRIFOOD QUALITY SERVICE 

(SENASA) 

RISK ANALYSIS UNIT 

QUESTION 1: 

AUTHORITY, ORGANIZATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE OF 

THE VETERINARY SERVICES IN THE REGION 

July 2003 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

3

1- AUTHORITY, ORGANIZATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE VETERINARY 

SERVICES IN THE REGION. 

¿WHAT HUMAN RESOURCES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE REGION TO CARRY OUT 

CONTROL PROGRAMS FOR LIVESTOCK DISEASES? 

In Argentina, SENASA (National Animal Health and Agrifood Quality Service) is the 

government agency responsible for carrying out animal health control programs. 

SENASA has its own budget within the Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries 

and Foodstuffs. 

The organizational charts and maps included in Annex I illustrate the structure and organization of SENASA and the Argentine Animal Health System. 

Decree # 1585/96 defines the organizational structure of the new SENASA after the 

former SENASA (National Animal Health Service) merged with IASCAV (Argentine 

Plant Health and Quality Institute). The new SENASA is responsible for ensuring the 

health of animal and plant products to protect the health of consumers, animals and 

plants, and conducting quality controls of local and imported products. 

SENASA is also responsible for establishing animal and plant health and quality policies, and ensuring compliance with the applicable current regulations. In addition, 

SENASA is responsible for all movements of animals within the country and the inspection of imported and exported animals, animal and plant products and byproducts, 

agriproducts, pharmacological and veterinary products, agrochemicals and fertilizers. 

SENASA's staff totals 3536 officials. In Animal Health, there are 4 main areas that report directly to the President of SENASA. These areas are: 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

4

• NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH OFFICE (DNSA) 

• NATIONAL AGRIFOOD INSPECTION OFFICE (DNFA) 

• QUARANTINE, BORDERS AND CERTIFICATIONS UNIT (CCFyC) 

• LABORATORIES AND TECHNICAL CONTROL OFFICE (DILACOT) 

NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH OFFICE (DNSA) 

DNSA is specifically responsible for animal health control and eradication programs, 

including the necessary preventive, control and eradication actions to ensure compliance with current statutes. The actions defined by DNSA are carried out by the 316 Local Offices located throughout the country which are staffed by 237 veterinary physicians, 436 animal technicians, and 181 administrative employees. The Local Offices 

report to DNSA through 25 REGIONAL SUPERVISORS. The EPIDEMIOLOGY OFFICE 

of DNSA is responsible for carrying out, coordinating, assessing and overseeing the 

FMD program. DNSA is also responsible for strategic prevention activities, and surveillance and assessment of the vaccination programs. The organization and operational 

structure of DNSA is defined in SENASA Resolution # 274/2002. 

In addition to the Official Veterinary Services (at the Federal, Provincial and Municipal 

levels of government), the animal health system is strengthened by the support of a participatory structure based on 349 Local Animal Health Offices that were created in 1989 

for the FMD Eradication Program, 10 of these are located at the Patagonia region. 

These Local Offices that represent various local organizations, have technical Subcommittees chaired by official or private veterinary physicians that practice in the area 

that work very closely with SENASA. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

5

At a Regional level, there are 23 Provincial Animal Health Committees (COPROSAS) 

that participate in the National FMD Eradication Committee (CONALFA) which constitutes a forum for consensus where the provincial governments, SENASA, and representatives of the farmers' associations define the operational strategies to carry out the 

zoosanitary policies defined by SENASA. 

Diseases for which notification is mandatory must be reported to SENASA authorities 

(Section 4 of the Animal Health Law Enforcement Authority Act - # 3959 enacted in 

1902 - states: "All owners or persons who in any manner are responsible for providing 

care or assistance to animals affected by a contagious disease or suspect animals, 

must immediately report the condition to the local authority stated in the Animal Health 

Regulations"). 

The system of Local Animal Health Offices is an important source of information because their trained staff visits all livestock operations at least twice a year to vaccinate 

the animals, and the information they gather serves to strengthen the official inspection 

system of livestock operations, movements of animals, and livestock concentration 

markets. 

There are approximately 5,750 private veterinary physicians working in rural areas that 

by law, are required to report epizootic diseases (Act # 3959). In addition, these professionals participate in the technical subcommittees of the Regional and Local Animal 

Health Offices that strengthen the eradication programs. 

The National Farming Technology Institute (INTA) which is part of SAGPyA, has a network of experimental and extension facilities in rural areas that receive updated information on the health status of the herds. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

6

The private laboratories accredited by SENASA that participate in the Network of Laboratories are required to immediately report all epizootic diseases. Non-compliance with 

current regulations implies severe penalties. 

NATIONAL AGRIFOOD INSPECTION SERVICE (DNFA). 

At a national level, DNFA is responsible for ensuring that slaughtering plants, processing plants, and/or storage facilities for animal and plant products and byproducts 

(whether edible or inedible), comply with hygiene and health requirements. At the 

slaughtering plants approved for export, these controls are performed by the Veterinary 

Inspection Service. 

QUARANTINE, BORDERS AND CERTIFICATIONS UNIT (CCFyC). 

CCFyC is responsible for the ANIMAL AND PLANT QUARANTINE UNIT, the INTERNATIONAL MOVEMENTS UNIT, and the BORDERS AND SANITARY BARRIERS 

UNIT that operates the control posts at the inland sanitary barriers and border crossings 

(ports, airports, and border crossings). 

LABORATORIES AND TECHNICAL CONTROL OFFICE (DILACOT) 

DILACOT - which has two Units - the Laboratory for Animal Products and Byproducts 

and the Laboratory for Plant Products and Byproducts - is the National Reference Laboratory for food safety and animal and plant health. In addition, DILACOT has Regional 

Laboratories and manages a countrywide Network of Laboratories accredited by 

SENASA. DILACOT: 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

7

• Establishes the methods and test protocols to be used at the Central Laboratory 

and the laboratories that participate in SENASA's National Network of Laboratories. 

• Intervenes in dispute resolution. 

• Confirms positive test results issued by the laboratories that participate in the 

Network of Laboratories. 

• Carries out and participates in interlaboratory tests. 

• Periodically audits the Network of Laboratories. 

• Provides assistance to other SENASA offices to assess analytical results. 

• Participates in reviewing regulations in its field of action and attends International 

Fora (Codex Alimentarius, MERCOSUR, O.I.E., etc.). 

Table 1: Animal Health Structure of the Argentine Patagonia below paralell 42. 

Chubut Santa Cruz Tierra del TOTAL 

SENASA ́s 

local offices

6 3 2 11 

Commisions* 26 4 - 30 

SENASA ́s 

 veterinarians 

7 3 2 12 

SENASA ́s 

technicians 

12 6 2 20 

SENASA ́s 

Administrative 

Personnel 

3 2 2 7 

Provincial 

veterinarians 

6 11 2 19 

Private 

veterinarians 

145 31 26 202 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

8

WHICH ARE THE PROCEDURES FOR SPECIMEN COLLECTION? 

The procedures for specimen collection are described in Annex II. 

WHAT DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES AND TECHNIQUES ARE ROUTINELY 

FOLLOWED FOR EACH DISEASE AGENT OF CONCERN? 

The following techniques for diagnosis and identification of the FMD virus are used in 

Argentina: 

• Antibody identification by ELISA testing 

• Typing by ELISA testing 

• Complement Fixation 

• Virus isolation (in lactating mice and cell tissues) 

• Virus identification by monoclonal antibodies 

• Virus neutralization 

• Seroprotection 

• VIAA - IDGA 

• 3 ABC ELISA 

• EITB 

• PCR 

• Sequencing 

• Inoculation in bovines under stringent biosafety conditions 

The above techniques are consistent with those listed in Chapter 2.1.1 - Foot and Mouth Disease - of the 

O.I.E. Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines - rev. 2000, and are included in SENASA's 

Operational Procedures and Instructions Manual (Virology Unit - SENASA - 2001). 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

9

The techniques used in Argentina for non-vesicular diseases are: 

Isolation of Bovine Herpes Virus in cell lines or in primary BFT or BFR cultures collected 

by vaginal, vulva or penis swabbing, or from lesions of virus infected animals, or necropsy samples (lungs, brain, kidneys, etc.). 

Isolation of Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD) in cell lines or in primary BFT or BFR cultures, 

from samples of secretions or necropsy (guts, ganglia, brain, etc.). 

Immunofluorescence of non-cytopathic BVD strains. 

Techniques to measure antibodies: 

For IBR and BVD: serum neutralization. ELISA test - commercial kit. 

For Blue Tongue in sheep and cattle: immunodiffusion (PANAFTOSA, PAHO), ELISA 

test (PANAFTOSA, PAHO). 

Vaccine Controls: 

For virus strains such as BHV-1, BVD: 

Specific safety in cell lines and non-specific safety in guinea pigs, toxicity in mice, serum 

conversion in guinea pigs. 

WHAT LAWS, REGULATIONS AND POLICIES ARE IN EFFECT? (FOR EXAMPLE IS 

WASTE FEEDING OR WASTE-CONTAINING FEED PERMITTED AND, IF SO, WHAT 

RESTRICTIONS APPLY) 

See Annex III 

WHAT SECURITY MEASURES ARE IN PLACE AT PORTS OF ENTRY TO CONTROL IMPORTATION OF MATERIALS THAT MIGHT CARRY DISEASE AGENTS OF 

CONCERN? 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

10

The procedures and criteria applied by Argentina for imported live animals, their genetic 

material, and animal products and byproducts, are based on the principles of Risk 

Analysis, Regionalization and Equivalence included in the SPS Agreement of the World 

Trade Organization (WTO), and the rules approved by the Office International des Epizooties (O.I.E.) 

The permits to import live animals, their genetic material and animal products and byproducts must be approved by SENASA's Central Office. 

Prior to importing live animals, their genetic material, and animal products and byproducts, the importer must apply for an import permit which is only issued if all the applicable zoosanitary requirements stated in SENASA regulations are met. 

The import permit may be issued after an analysis and assessment of: 

• The type of product that will be imported. 

• The health status of the exporting country. 

• Approval of the slaughtering or processing plant in the country of origin. 

• Type of shipment. 

• Transit of the product through other countries. 

• Border post at the point of entry into Argentina. 

• Expected use of the product. 

Annex IV includes a detailed description of the procedures required at the port of entry. 

The products authorized for import shall be safe and shall not constitute a possible 

source of the FMD virus, as stated in the O.I.E. recommendations. 

At the point of entry, the imported products or animals are subject to a physical inspec-
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

11

tion, verification of correct labelling, and documentation check, even though a complete 

zoosanitary risk assessment is required prior to the issuance of the pertinent import 

permit. 

In addition, at the Authorized Border Posts with cross-border traffic, vehicles, passengers, and luggage are inspected to identify products that may represent a zoophytosanitary risk. 

All imported live animals must be placed in quarantine. SENASA has a Quarantine Facility in the City of Buenos for this purpose. The required quarantine period and quarantine conditions are in accordance with international recommendations. At the end of the 

quarantine period, the imported animals are placed under observation at the farm of 

destination for a period of sixty (60) days. After this period, the local SENASA veterinary 

physician must issue a report certifying that the post-quarantine period has been completed. Ruminant breeding animals and their genetic material are included in the Epidemiological Surveillance System to avoid entry of bovines affected by Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE). 

Measures have been adopted to reduce the risk and the reintroduction of FMD virus. 

These measures are principally centered on mitigating the external risk and maintaining 

adequate internal controls to promptly detect FMD cases. To this end, specific rules and 

sanitary actions have been put in place that reduces the possibility of the FMD virus 

entering our country. 

SENASA Resolution # 32/2000 defines the mission and functions of the QUARANTINE, 

BORDERS AND CERTIFICATIONS UNIT and SENASA Resolution # 511/2001 assigns 

responsibility for coordinating and supervising the controls of imported products at the 

various points of entry. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

12

SENASA Resolutions # 816/2002 and # 1354/1994 define pre-importation procedures 

and controls, and health certificates requirements for animal products and byproducts, 

and for live animals and their reproductive material, respectively. 

Resolution # 398/1999 states the requirements to import FMD susceptible animals, and 

animal products and byproducts, as well as all other risk material for FMD. 

SENASA Resolution # 99/1999 establishes the creation of the Brigade of Beagle dogs 

to operate at the main airports. The dogs are trained to detect organic products carried 

by passengers or in luggage. In addition, scanners to identify any type of organic material were installed at the main Authorized Border Crossing Points. 

AFIP (Federal Administration of Government Revenues) Resolution # 636/1999 and 

SENASA Resolution # 760/99 jointly approve the Customs Declaration and Affidavit for 

imported animals, plants, and farm products, which must be completed by all persons 

entering the country. 

At the points of entry into the country, posters and brochures provide information to create awareness about the products that are banned for entry into Argentina for zoosanitary and phytosanitary reasons. 

Several agreements with law enforcement authorities (Border Patrol, Coast Guard, and 

National Aeronautical Police) were signed to have their collaboration in performing the 

controls at the borders and other points of entry. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

13

NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND AGRIFOOD QUALITY SERVICE 

(SENASA) 

RISK ANALYSIS UNIT 

QUESTION 2: 

DISEASE STATUS, i.e., IS THE RESTRICTED DISEASE AGENT KNOWN TO EXIST 

IN THE REGION? IF YES, AT WHAT PREVALENCE? IF NO, WHEN WAS THE 

MOST RECENT DIAGNOSIS? 

July 2003 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

14

2- DISEASE STATUS, i.e., IS THE RESTRICTED DISEASE AGENT KNOWN TO EXIST IN THE REGION? IF YES, AT WHAT PREVALENCE? IF NO, WHEN WAS THE 

MOST RECENT DIAGNOSIS? 

Patagonia is a region free from FMD without vaccination. The lasts outbreaks in Patagonia were registered in 1976 (Chubut province), 1971 (Santa Cruz province), and 1967 

(Tierra del Fuego province). 

IS REPORTING THE PEST OR DISEASE AGENT REQUIRED IN THE REGION? 

Act # 24,305/93 and pertinent regulations require immediate and mandatory reporting of 

FMD cases in the Republic of Argentina. As stated in the FMD statutes, SENASA has 

authority to apply severe penalties when a person or company does not report the disease. 

IF THE PEST OR DISEASE AGENT WAS PRESENT AND SUBSEQUENTLY ERADICATED, WHAT METHODS WERE USED FOR ERADICATION? 

The disease eradication strategy was based on the quick detection of outbreaks and 

eradication of the infection source by stamping-out policy and depopulation of the affected areas. Systematic vaccination has never been used. 

Sanitary rifle and burial of all of the susceptible animals in the affected area premises 

have been used in the last outbreaks in Tierra del Fuego and Santa Cruz (years 1967 

and 1971 respectively). 

Restriction in the movement of animals and ring vaccination has been used in the last 

outbreak in the province of Chubut. It was the only case in which sanitary rifle has not 

been used. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

15

WHAT GEOGRAPHIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EXPORTING REGION MAY INFLUENCE THE PREVALENCE OF THE PEST OR DISEASE AGENT? 

FMD in Argentina has proven to be highly sensitive to the variety and size of the livestock ecosystems in the country. The parameters of the patterns which were identified 

with the epidemiological studies differ significantly between the various regions of the 

country. 

The climate and the environment in Patagonia make sheep to be almost the only livestock and the prevailing livestock activity (Patagonia has almost 60 % of the sheep 

stock of Argentina). 

Sheep population in Patagonia is aproximately, 9 million sheep and produces more than 

72 % of the best wool of the country. Livestock density is less than 1 animal per hectare. 

Contact between sheep and bovines exists mostly in Central and Mesopotamia regions, 

where prevailing livestock is bovine cattle, but this is not the case in Patagonia, where 

the contact is negligible. 

Low density of animals and ovine breeding conditions in Patagonia diminish the possibility for the virus to contaminate the environment in a persisting way and to produce the 

infection of other animals by spray or fomites. Due to the low number of ovine movements there is low probability of contact between them and other susceptible species of 

distant populations or sub-populations. 

Patagonia is under a very restrictive policy and due to this the trade of products that 

may represent a risk of transmission of FMD virus from other places of Argentina or 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

16

from other countries is forbidden. The whole Patagonia territory constitutes a region 

which may be considered as FMD very low risk and this is historically verifiable. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

17

NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND AGRIFOOD QUALITY SERVICE 

(SENASA) 

RISK ANALYSIS UNIT 

QUESTION 3: 

STATUS OF ADJACENT REGIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE AGENT 

July 2003 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

18

3- STATUS OF ADJACENT REGIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE AGENT. 

FOR EACH RELEVANT HAZARD, IS THE PEST OR DISEASE AGENT KNOWN TO 

EXIST, OR HAS IT EXISTED PREVIOUSLY, IN ANY REGION ADJACENT TO THE 

REGION PROPOSING THE TRADE? 

IF YES, AT WHAT PREVALENCE? 

IF NO, WHEN WAS THE MOST RECENT DIAGNOSIS? 

The FMD status of neighboring countries is stated in O.I.E. - HANDISTATUS, November 2002. 

Chile: 

FMD free with no vaccination. Chile stopped vaccinating in June 1980 and was recognized by the O.I.E. as an FMD free country with no vaccination in January 1981. The 

last outbreak reported to the O.I.E. was in August 1987. 

North of Argentine Patagonia, above Parallel 42: 

The North of Argentine Patagonia, above Parallel 42 is divides into two zones, North A 

and B Patagonia, and they represent a Buffer zone and a surveillance zone respectively, and they prevent the introduction of FMD into Patagonia. 

North B Patagonia region is the Surveillance Zone required by the OIE as protection to 

the South zone declared “Free from FMD where vaccination is not practiced”. In this 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

19

region vaccination is not practiced, and it is epidemiologically equivalent to South Patagonia Region regarding not occurrence of FMD. The last FMD outbreak took place in 

1994, and then sanitary rifle and depopulation of the affected area was applied. 

Vaccination is practiced in North A Patagonia region and it is separated from the previous region by the Negro river. All of the accesses have sanitary barriers controlling the 

entering and transit of products and by-products of animal and vegetal origin. The lasts 

registries of the disease in the zone happened during the year 2001, with 7 outbreaks, 

all of them Type A virus. Sanitary measures included immobilization of animals of the 

zone and ring vaccination. 

ARE THERE ANY RELEVANT FACTORS ABOUT THE ADJACENT REGIONS THAT 

SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT (E.G., SIZE, DISTANCE FROM ADJACENT 

BORDER TO AFFECTED HERDS OR ANIMALS)? 

This region is bounded with FMD free regions without vaccination. Possibilities of introduction of FMD virus to the region through frontiers can be considered as negligible. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

20

NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND AGRIFOOD QUALITY SERVICE 

(SENASA) 

RISK ANALYSIS UNIT 

QUESTION 4: 

EXTENT OF AN ACTIVE DISEASE-CONTROL PROGRAM, IF ANY, IF THE AGENT 

IS KNOWN TO EXIST IN THE REGION 

July 2003 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

21

4- EXTENT OF AN ACTIVE DISEASE-CONTROL PROGRAM, IF ANY, IF THE 

AGENT IS KNOWN TO EXIST IN THE REGION. 

This point is not answered as the agent is not present in the region. 

WHAT IS THE EXTENT OF AN ACTIVE DISEASE-CONTROL PROGRAM, IF ANY, IF 

THE PEST OR DISEASE AGENT IS KNOWN TO EXIST IN THE REGION OR RECENTLY EXISTED IN THE REGION? 

ARE INFECTED OR EXPOSED ANIMALS OR PREMISES QUARANTINED? IF SO, 

FOR HOW LONG? 

ARE AFFECTED PREMISES MONITORED, AND IF SO, HOW?

WHAT TESTS ARE PERFORMED PRIOR TO RELEASING THE QUARANTINE? 

IF DEPOPULATION IS USED, HOW ARE CARCASSES DISPOSED OF (ARE THEY 

SALVAGED AT ABATTOIRS)? 

IS INDEMNITY PAID ON DESTROYED ANIMALS? 

HAVE PREMISES, THOUGHT TO HAVE BEEN CLEANED UP, LATER BEEN 

FOUND TO STILL BE AFFECTED?
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

22

NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND AGRIFOOD QUALITY SERVICE 

(SENASA) 

RISK ANALYSIS UNIT 

QUESTION 5: 

VACCINATION STATUS OF THE REGION. WHEN WAS THE LAST VACCINATION? 

WHAT IS THE EXTENT OF VACCINATION IF IT IS CURRENTLY USED, 

AND WHAT VACCINE IS BEING USED? 

July 2003 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

23

5- VACCINATION STATUS OF THE REGION. WHEN WAS THE LAST VACCINATION? WHAT IS THE EXTENT OF VACCINATION IF IT IS CURRENTLY USED, AND 

WHAT VACCINE IS BEING USED? 

WHEN WAS THE LAST VACCINATION? 

In Patagonia, below parallel 42, vaccination has never been applied. Surveillance zone 

(North B Patagonia) is not vaccinated either. 

IS THE ADMINISTRATION OF SERUM PERMITTED? IF SO, BY WHOM AND UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS? 

Administration of serum is not permitted. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

24

NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND AGRIFOOD QUALITY SERVICE 

(SENASA) 

RISK ANALYSIS UNIT 

QUESTION 6: 

DEGREE TO WHICH THE REGION IS SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT REGIONS 

OF HIGHER RISK THROUGH PHYSICAL OR OTHER BARRIERS 

July 2003 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

25

6-. DEGREE TO WHICH THE REGION IS SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT REGIONS OF HIGHER RISK THROUGH PHYSICAL OR OTHER BARRIERS 

South Patagonia Region is located at the south extreme of the National Territory and 

comprises the provinces of Chubut, Santa Cruz, Tierra del Fuego, Islas del Atlántico 

Sur and Antártida with a surface of 490.200 ks.2. (the west region of Isla Grande of 

Tierra del Fuego is the only insular part included) 

This region is delimited (SENASA Resolution 58/01) by the political borders of the 

above mentioned provinces, except for the north border which is delineated as follows: 

by parallel 42° from the Atlantic ocean to the Piltriquitrón mountains (cordilleran zone), 

following to the north by the mentioned mountains to the Serrucho mountains (East border), to the Villegas and Manso rivers (North border) and the border with Chile (West 

border). 

South Patagonia Region is separated from the more risky National Territory regions by 

the North B Patagonia Region, which acts as a Surveillance zone (without vaccination) and it comprises the province of Neuquén (except for part of the confluent department) and the area of the province of Río Negro to the south of the Negro river. This 

region has the same sanitary restrictions for susceptible animals and risk products entrance as South Patagonia Region. 

Complementing the mentioned region there can be found North A Patagonia which 

acts as a buffer zone and comprises the other part of the province of Río Negro and the 

Patagones Department in the province of Buenos Aires and part of the confluent department of the province of Neuquén. Vaccination is practiced in this region and there 

are restrictions for the entrance of animals and risk products from other regions of the 

country. 

In all cases prohibitions and restrictions for entering to regions are established by 

SENASA Resolutions N° 58/01 and 1051/02, and complementary decrees. 

To strengthen the surveillance and control mechanisms of all of the documentation regarding transit and movement of marketable livestock and other susceptible and products of animal origin or agricultural which could be carry the FMD virus to the Patagonia 

region, and complying with the international standards, SENASA has implemented 

Sanitary Barriers acting as supervisor or delegating duties to other official offices, or not 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

26

official entities with whom SENASA has agreements of cooperation and delegation of 

duties. 

To explain what was previously mentioned, charts are attached which show the number 

of terrestrial and air points in the sanitary barriers in this regions, diagrams with their 

location and the number of personnel working. 

See diagram N° 1.- 

SANITARY BARRIERS 

1.- TERRESTRIAL POINTS 

SANITARY BARRIERS Geographical location TERRESTRIAL 

POINTS 

NORTH A Patagonia Sanitary Region 

Colorado river 10 

NORTH B Patagonia Sanitary Region 

Neuquén (Barrancas river) 

Neuquén (Confluencia 

Dep.) 

Río Negro (on Negro river 

and National route 250) 

04 

16 

04 

SOUTH Patagonia Sanitary Region 

Parallel 42 and Piltriquitrón 

mountains 

3 

NUMBER OF TERRESTRIAL 

POINTS 

 37 

2.- AIR POINTS 

SANITARY REGION AIRPORTS 

North A Patagonia 3 (Viedma-G. Roca-Neuquén) 

North B Patagonia 2 (R. Sauces, Bariloche) 

South Patagonia 9 (Pto. Madryn, Rawson, C. Rivadavia, Trelew, Esquel, Río Gallegos, 

Calafate, Río Grande and Ushuaia 

TOTAL AIR POINTS 14 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

27

3.- HUMAN RESOURCES 

COORDINATION 

/ 

SANITARY 

REGIONS 

Professional 

Coordinator 

Barrier 

Provincial 

link 

SENASA 

Local link 

SENASA 

Supporting 

profession 

/ Technicians 

Point Chief 

Supervisor 

/ auxiliary 

Administratives 

NORTH A 

PATAGONIA 

Colorado river 

barrier

2 1 1 3 72 17 

NORTH B 

PATAGONIA 

Terrestrial points 

- Airports 

1 2 3 4 82 -- 

SOUTH PATAGONIA 

Terrestrial points 

- airports 

-- 3 -- 5 42 -- 

TOTALS 3 6 4 12 196 17 

Professionals: 25 

Technicians: 196 

Administrative auxiliaries: 17 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

28

SOUTH PATAGONIA REGION 

Detailed description 

Land entry and control posts 

Arroyo Verde Post. 

It is located on one of the two land paved communication ways to enter the region, 

which is National Route No 3. 

Said route is the main communication way of Patagonia region Atlantic coast. It is used 

for most commercial vehicular circulation and transit of passengers, neighbors, tourists 

or residents. 

It is the mandatory point of entry for all the provisioning of the region. The cities of 

Puerto Madryn, Trelew, Rawson and Comodoro Rivadavia can be found by the route 

side, being the centers of provincial political power and main tourism and production 

activities (fishing and oil extraction). 

These cities conform the core of highest population density with higher purchasing capacity and installed commercial capacity for storage and distribution of inputs and goods 

in the province. 

Río Villegas Post 

It is located in “Nahuel Huapi” National Park area, on National Route # 258. This 

route leads to the cordilleran zone of South Patagonia Sanitary Region. 

Similar to National Route #3, Route # 258 is the main road used for extra-regional transit, whether commercial, of passengers or tourists. El Bolsón and Esquel are the main 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

29

human settlements and constitute one of the links of the tourism chain of Bariloche city 

and surrounding areas. Its population density, commercial, industrial and tourism characteristics are similar to those described for Arroyo Verde area. 

 El Maitén Post 

It is located in the crossing of National Route No 40 and provincial Route #6. 

These are old soil access roads that lost their commercial relevance as a result of the 

construction of National Route No258. 

These communication ways are used only by area settlers with similar social and 

cultural characteristics (indigenous settlements). 

Characteristics of Patagonia table-land in Parallel 42 influence area. 

Main factors or variables that contribute to region sanitary preservation. 

Population: 

Two main adjoining Departments located on Parallel 42 have a more than scarce stable population. That is: 

Gastre Department: 1650 inhabitants. Density per square Km.: 0,1 inhabitant 

Telsen Department: 1398 inhabitants. Density per square r Km, 0,1 inhabitant 

Topography 

Patagonia table-land is formed by arid soil, almost completely deprived of vegetation, 

with thorned and stunted bushes . 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

30

Climate 

Weather conditions in Patagonia are cold, windy and snowy winters and dry and windy 

summers. 

Economy 

Table-land is not fit for cropping. Sheep production and wool production are the main 

agricultural products of the region. 

Road infrastructure 

It has land and stone roads with no maintenance. Many of them turned into paths and 

depressions difficult to transit except when using double-wheel drive. Moreover there is 

an absolute lack of road signals and helping services (garages, oil, telephones, security, 

etc.) 

In unfavorable weather conditions, rain, snow, ice and wind turn the roads dangerous 

and risky. 

Population cultural and economic characteristics . 

The main population settlements lack of telephones, electric light at all times, with a 

level of income per person below the line of poverty. 

Sheep are the main meat suppliers for human consumption, and they have a price of 

approximately $ 1.5 to 1.7 per Kilo, any cut, when a maturated bovine meat cut varies 

from $ 9 to $ 13. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

31

Institutional Characteristics 

- A significant integration of provincial authorities with regional SENASA officers 

has taken place, who work in tandem. 

- To that purpose, provincial authorities and the National Office of Agricultural 

Commercial Control (ONCCA) participate in a plan for fiscal and sanitary regularization of slaughter plants. 

- A Sanitary Plan for Scab and Parasitic Insect Control is in place. This allows interaction with producers. 

- Other plans, such as Wool and Mohair, strengthen contact and interrelation. 

- The provincial Agricultural Social Plan addressed to small producers or livestock 

holders and the program of assistance to indigenous populations allow awareness on sanitary measures adopted in the region. 

- The presence of different regional authorities related to agricultural activities, e.g. 

Magistrate’s Court, Sheriff, Animal Health Committees (COPROSA ́s), gives 

place to more active participation and to an additional source of information and 

observation on regional news. 

Short reference regarding borders: 

 The Cordillera of Los Andes forms a natural border line of about 1.900 km. between South Patagonia region and Chile. Chile and this region of Argentina share the 

same sanitary status, both recognized by the OIE. 

 There are three SENASA-approved border crossings in the region for trade activities with Chile, i.e. Los Huemules, Cohayque and Integración Austral. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

32

 The rest of the region limits with the Atlantic Ocean and approved border crossings are located at ports, the main activity of which is the export of fishing products. The 

operation of international airports is related, basically, to tourism activities or domestic 

flights. 

 With regard to these and other international border crossings with Chile, approved for the transit of residents from other regions or tourists and control of passengers, luggage and means of transport, SENASA has issued sanitary rules listing the 

products that may be introduced into the country without sanitary risks (SENASA Resolution 295/99) along with the pertinent procedure manual (SENASA Resolution 299/99). 

In addition, an Assistance and Cooperation Agreement has been executed with official 

agencies with offices in border areas, such as the National Border Patrol, the Argentine 

Coast Guard, the National Aeronautic Police and the General Customs Bureau. 

Location map: 

 ARGENTINA Map 1 shows different Sanitary Regions into which Patagonia region is divided (North A Patagonia region, North B Patagonia region and South Patagonia region). Map 2 contains land barriers, air posts and border posts. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

33

Map 1 

R egi ón P atagonic a N orte “ A”

R egi ón P atagonic a N orte “ B”

R egi on P atagonic a “S ur”
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

34

Map 2 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

35

NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND AGRIFOOD QUALITY SERVICE 

(SENASA) 

RISK ANALYSIS UNIT 

QUESTION 7:

EXTENT TO WHICH MOVEMENT OF ANIMALS AND ANIMAL PRODUCTS IS CONTROLLED FROM REGIONS OF HIGHER RISK, AND LEVEL OF BIOSECURITY REGARDING SUCH MOVEMENTS 

July 2003 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

36

7-. EXTENT TO WHICH MOVEMENT OF ANIMALS AND ANIMAL PRODUCTS IS 

CONTROLLED FROM REGIONS OF HIGHER RISK, AND LEVEL OF BIOSECURITY 

REGARDING SUCH MOVEMENTS. 

FROM WHAT COUNTRIES OR REGIONS DOES THE REQUESTING REGION IMPORT PRODUCTS THAT COULD POTENTIALLY CARRY PEST OR DISEASE 

AGENTS OF CONCERN? 

ANIMALS FROM OTHER REGIONS OF THE COUNTRY 

Import of FMD susceptible animals to South and North B (surveillance) Patagonia regions from other regions of the country is forbidden (Resolution N° 1051/2002, dated 

31/12/2002). Import of FMD susceptible animals to South Patagonia region from North 

B Patagonia region is allowed if they comply with the requirements stated by the same 

rules (negative double serology and Probang test). 

SUSCEPTIBLE ANIMALS FROM OTHER COUNTRIES 

Import of susceptible animals from FMD Free countries or zones where vaccination is 

not practiced, recognized by the OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES (OIE) is 

authorized. Previous to import and Import Authorization, containing the sanitary requirements to be complied with by the foreign Veterinary Service must be approved. 

Documentary, physical and identity controls will be carried out at the entrance point to 

the authorized National Territory, granting, if pertinent, the Internment Permit with the 

destination previously approved, and after the quarantine, if appropriate. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

37

PRODUCTS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN 

Import of products of animal origin considered as possible carriers of the FMD virus to a 

free FMD zone and from other regions or countries with a lower sanitary status is established by the technical principles of the Office International des Epizooties. 

Thus, introduction of products considered as risky is forbidden or subjected to risk mitigation processes. The following are the specific sanitary standards established by 

SENASA for these cases: 

- SENASA Resolution N° 816/02 stating the procedures to authorize the import from 

third countries of products under this Service jurisdiction (this rule abolished 

SENASA Resolution N° 630/95). 

- SENASA Resolution N° 58/01 and complementary related rules, establishing prohibitions and restrictions of introduction of products of animal origin considered as 

risky to North A, B Patagonia and South Patagonia sanitary regions. 

- SENASA Resolution N° 1051/02 authorizing and ruling the import of semen and embryos of FMD susceptible species animals to South and North B Patagonia regions. 

Every shipping of these merchandises must only be made from Official Establishments 

under SENASA control, in authorized vehicles, previously sealed and with the corresponding health certificate stating that the products being carried comply with the sanitary requirements for their marketing in the Patagonia Region. 

At the barrier, each vehicle is subjected to documentary, physical and identity controls, 

authorizing, if pertinent, its entrance after registering its passing, sealing the vehicle for 

a second time and leaving constancy of the intervention in the sanitary documentation. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

38

The market for imported live animals susceptible to FMD in Argentina is currently limited 

due to health status requirements and the possibility of accessing better genetics with 

imported semen and embryos, among other reasons. 

Import procedures and requirements established by SENASA are in line with O.I.E. recommendations. 

Argentina requires a risk analysis for all imports of live animals to determine the epidemiological status of the country or region of origin, the existence of national or regional 

campaigns for the disease, the specific capabilities of the laboratories or quarantine facilities and their staff, and other factors that minimize the risk of importing exotic or high 

risk diseases into the country. For animal products, Argentina requires risk assessment 

and risk mitigation to minimize potential risks associated with the importation of some 

products. 

The Table included in Annex V lists the countries that export products that could potentially carry the FMD virus. 

TO WHAT EXTENT IS THE MOVEMENT OF SUCH PRODUCTS CONTROLLED 

FROM REGIONS OF HIGHER RISK, AND WHAT IS THE LEVEL OF BIOSECURITY 

REGARDING SUCH MOVEMENTS? 

All products and live animals that require approval from SENASA must meet similar security requirements. 

Import requirements may be summarized as shown below: 

a) Pre-importation authorization. 

b) Verification of the health certificate issued by the country of origin. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

39

c) Physical inspection, document control, and verification of the identity of the imported 

products. 

d) A Restricted Transit Permit for shipments of animal products to processing plants 

with official SENASA veterinary inspection. Live animals must be placed in quarantine at the Official Quarantine Facility. 

e) After inspection, the imported products are sampled for the purpose of the CREHA1

program and the document authorizing the release of the products is issued. In the 

case of live animals, said document is issued at the end of the quarantine period, if 

no pathology is found. With this document, the importer may collect the imported 

goods. 

The Customs Office, the Aeronautical Police, Border Patrol and the Coast Guard work 

with SENASA in performing the controls. 

In addition, international luggage check procedures are in place to identify and confiscate products that could represent a zoosanitary or phytosanitary risk for the country. 

SENASA has a Procedures Manual for Authorized Border Posts that describes the actions required at the border posts. The manual includes: 

- The Legal Framework 

- The National and International Zoosanitary Status 

- A Glossary

- The list of officials are authorized to sign the International Certificates and a List of 

Authorized Border Control Posts throughout the country.

- An epidemiological description of the Border Posts. (being implemented )

- Importation Procedures

 

1

 National Residue Control in Food Products and Hygiene Program 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

40

- Exportation Procedures

WHAT TEST PROCEDURES ARE USED? 

The diagnostic tests used by SENASA are those recommended by the O.I.E. for each 

agent. 

ARE IMPORT PERMITS AND HEALTH CERTIFICATES REQUIRED? 

Yes, import permits are required before the imported goods arrive in the country. 

The Import Permits are approved by the competent areas at the Central SENASA Office. 

The procedures to assess the risk, approve processing plants and processes in the 

country of origin, etc. are stated in Resolution No 816/02. Other SENASA requirements 

for imported animals include a health certificate signed by the Animal Health Service in 

the exporting country. Examples of these certificates are attached as Annex VI. 

WHAT OTHER PROCEDURES ARE USED? 

Other procedures require an approval of the exporting countries based on a technical 

audit in the exporting countries. The audit also includes abattoirs and food processing 

plants in the exporting countries, as required in Resolution No 816/02. 

ARE IMPORTED ANIMALS QUARANTINED? 

IF YES, FOR HOW LONG AND WHERE? 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

41

Imported animals are placed in SENASA's Quarantine facility "Lazareto Capital". The 

animals that require special conditions or treatment are placed in special quarantine 

facilities (e.g. zoo animals, ornamental birds or fish). 

The duration of the quarantine period varies to allow sufficient time to complete the 

various tests required, and according to the species and its origin. The quarantine period is between 15 and 60 days. 

See Annex VII. 

Annexes referring to Border Controls in Argentina: 

Annex VII A: Control Posts authorized by SENASA 

Annex VII B: Quantity of products condemned at border posts under SENASA control. 

Annex VII C: Quantity of products condemned at border posts authorized by SENASA 

(Border Patrol Authority and Coast Guard). 

Annex VII D: Inspection of animal shipments (September 2001 to September 2002).

Annex VII E: Legal Framework. 

- SENASA Resolution No 1505/2000 – States the actions that must be carried out in 

response to a sanitary warning. 

- SENASA Resolution No 32/2001 – Establishes the QUARANTINE, BORDERS AND 

CERTIFICATIONS UNIT (CCFyC) 

- SENASA Resolution No 501/2001 – Approves the Border Post Procedures Manual. 

- SENASA Resolution No 511/01 -– Appoints officials to the border control posts authorized by SENASA 

- SENASA Resolution No 462/01 and 538/02 – Describes the procedures for residue 

disposal and waste management at the border posts. 

- SENASA Resolution No 819/02 – Lists the border posts authorized by SENASA. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

42

- Guidelines to Inspect Animal Shipments. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

43

NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND AGRIFOOD QUALITY SERVICE 

(SENASA) 

RISK ANALYSIS UNIT 

QUESTION 8: 

LIVESTOCK DEMOGRAPHICS AND MARKETING PRACTICES IN THE REGION 

July 2003 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

44

8-.LIVESTOCK DEMOGRAPHICS AND MARKETING PRACTICES IN THE REGION 

HOW MANY HERDS, FLOCKS, ETC., OF EACH RELEVANT SPECIES ARE IN THE 

REGION?

Table 2: Number of livestock and Establishments in Patagonia Argentina below parallel 

42 (year 2002), per province 

PROVINCE ESTABLISHMENTS BOVINES OVINES 

Chubut 8836 136,559 4,022,771

Santa Cruz 1686 46,798 2,333,526

Tierra del Fuego 52 23,525 515,171

Total of the Region 10574 206,882 6,871,468
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

45

HOW ARE THEY DISTRIBUTED (E.G., HERD DENSITY, ETC.)?

Due to the arid characteristics of the region, one of the only possible livestock activity is 

the extensive sheep breeding for wool production. Prevailing breeds are Merino and 

Corriedale. Production systems are characterized by developing in large farms with important flock of sheep, but with a very low density per animal. 

Average livestock density in the region is 14 sheep per km2, being Santa Cruz the province with the lower value (9.5 animals per km2

). 

Bovine production is secondary, with approximately 175,000 animals in the whole region 

WHERE ARE THE MAJOR LIVESTOCK MARKETING CENTERS? 

There are no fairs or livestock concentration markets in South Patagonia region. There 

are annual exhibitions-fairs for selling of ovine breeders in Santa Cruz (Río Gallegos) 

and Chubut (Comodoro Rivadavia, Trelew and Esquel). Each of them auctions approximately 400 rams. 

Moreover, large farms carry out their annual breeders auctions in their own premises. 

There are no livestock concentration markets for fattening and slaughter. Trade is carry 

out directly from the establishment to the slaughterhouse. 

WHAT ARE THE PATTERNS OF LIVESTOCK MOVEMENT WITHIN THE REGION? 

Movements of animals within the region are limited. Due to the production systems 

which characterize the patagonic establishments movement of animals is limited to buying of male breeders once a year and direct selling of discard animals and lambs to 

coldstore plants (the last ones for export). 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

46

HOW ARE THE ANIMALS TRANSPORTED AND HANDLED DURING MARKET 

TRANSACTIONS? 

Animals are transported on special vehicles serving only for this purpose. The vehicles 

must comply with SENASA Resolution # 97/99 which requires approval of the vehicle by 

SENASA, and SENASA Resolution # 809/82 which states hygiene and sanitation requirements. 

Commercialization of animals is carried out, in general, directly from the establishment 

to the coldstore plant or to other establishments. As it was previously mentioned there 

are no livestock concentrations (fair auctions). Buying of breeders is carried out in fairs 

or in other farms, directly. 

To market or move animals, the farmers must be registered and have a RENSPA number (National Register of Farmers as defined in Resolution # 417/97 of the former Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Foodstuffs - see copy of the RENSPA 

in Annex VIII -). Shipment of animals to any destination requires a DTA (Animal Transit 

Document) (SENASA Resolution # 848/98), and a Provincial Transit Certificate (Guía) 

that is issued by provincial authorities. A copy of the DTA is attached in Annex IX. 

The Local SENASA Offices keep a record of the movements of susceptible animals and 

report this information on a monthly basis to the statistics unit of DNSA (Monthly Statistics - I.E.M.), and to the Technical Management Unit (S.G.S.). and the QUARANTINE, 

BORDERS AND CERTIFICATIONS UNIT (CCFyC) 

To better control animal shipments and guarantee an adequate follow-up of the animals, 

Resolution # 178/01 requires mandatory individual branding of the animals, correct 

identification of the transportation vehicles, and establishes joint liability for the Official 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region, as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

Risk Analysis Unit 

47

staff that issues the health certificate, the owners or persons responsible for the animals, the shippers and the slaughtering plants. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

48

NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND AGRIFOOD QUALITY SERVICE 

(SENASA) 

RISK ANALYSIS UNIT 

QUESTION 9: 

TYPE AND EXTENT OF DISEASE SURVEILLANCE IN THE REGION, E.G., IS IT 

PASSIVE AND/OR ACTIVE, AND WHAT IS THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF 

SAMPLING AND TESTING 

July 2003 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

49

9- TYPE AND EXTENT OF DISEASE SURVEILLANCE IN THE REGION, E.G. IS IT 

PASSIVE AND/OR ACTIVE, AND WHAT IS THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF 

SAMPLING AND TESTING 

The epidemio-surveillance system in Argentina is applied at three levels: central, regional and local. 

1) CENTRAL LEVEL

The central level includes the National Animal Health Office (DNSA), the Epidemiology 

Office and the National FMD Eradication Committee (CONALFA). The central level analyzes the information, defines strategies and general actions, and issues reports. 

Most of the information is provided by other areas of SENASA, government agencies 

and international organizations. SENASA issues two reports: a national report and an 

international report with the information submitted to SENASA's International and Institutional Affairs Office. The international report is distributed to other countries and international bodies such as PAHO/WHO and the O.I.E. 

2) REGIONAL LEVEL: 

The regional level includes SENASA's Regional Supervisors and the Provincial Animal 

Health Committees (COPROSAS). This level functions as liaison between the central 

level and the local offices. It also manages and assesses health documentation, and 

supports the Local Animal Health Offices with human and economic resources. The regional level is also responsible for managing and harmonizing the national strategies. 

3) LOCAL LEVEL:
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

50

The local level is the operational level and primary source of data (animal health protocols, reports suspect cases, remits samples to the laboratory, etc.). This level includes 

the local SENASA offices and the animal health NGOs. 

Active and passive surveillance systems are in place. 

Passive Surveillance: 

Notification and recording of outbreaks and suspect cases of vesicular diseases: Section 9 of Act # 24,305 states that FMD must be reported immediately by individuals 

and/or companies that know about, or suspect the presence of the disease. Sections 

46, 47, 48, 49 and 50 of Regulatory Decree # 643/96 of the FMD Act require mandatory 

reporting and describe the reporting process. After a case is reported to the Local 

SENASA Office and the official veterinarian visits the farm, said official prepares the 

protocol (Resolution # 383/2001), and faxes it to the Epidemiology Office within 24 

hours. 

The Analysis and Outbreak Recording Unit of the Epidemiology Office analyses and 

classifies the health reports into one of the following categories: outbreak, suspect case 

of vesicular disease, or notification of an FMD compatible disease. 

SENASA's Central Laboratory receives and tests the samples remitted by the Local 

SENASA Offices. The test results are sent by fax to the Epidemiology Office and the 

Local SENASA Office that sent the samples. The test results are also sent by e-mail to 

the Regional Supervisors. 

LABORATORY TESTING OF SUSPICIOUS ANIMALS. IF YES, WHAT PROCEDURES AND TO WHAT EXTENT (E.G., WHAT PROPORTION OF SUSPICIOUS 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

51

CASES ARE EVALUATED USING EACH OF THE SPECIFIC LABORATORY PROCEDURES)? 

When the Veterinary Physician of the Local SENASA Office receives a report of a suspect case and his diagnosis does not confirm the absence of the FMD virus, the veterinarian collects samples for virus identification purposes. 

If the Official Veterinarian considers that the quantity or quality of the samples do not 

meet the minimum standards, blood or esophageal-pharyngeal fluid samples from approximately 16 animals of the herd are required; the animals must be identified and bled 

again after twenty or thirty days. 

Epithelium and esophageal-pharyngeal fluid samples are tested by ELISA for virus typing. Blood samples are tested by 3 ABC ELISA to identify non-structural antibodies for 

the FMD virus and the test results are confirmed with EITB. 

ARE QUARANTINES IMPOSED ON PREMISES WITH SUSPICIOUS CASES, PENDING FINAL DIAGNOSIS? 

Yes, premises are quarantined until the final diagnosis is issued. 

ARE SERUM SURVEYS CONDUCTED, AND IF SO, HOW FREQUENTLY, WHAT 

SAMPLE SIZES ARE USED, AND WHAT HAS BEEN FOUND? 

Yes, active epidemio-surveillance actions include serum surveys to identify and measure viral activity. Serology is a tool used regularly that provides a legitimate measure 

and interpretation of the progress of the National Program. The design of the survey 

(e.g. sample size, regions and subregions into which the country is divided, etc.), is 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

52

based on the epidemiological status at the time the survey is conducted and the goals 

that were set. 

Samplings are performed in areas where FMD outbreaks have never occurred and 

where vaccination has never been applied (Northern Patagonia B and Southern Patagonia). 

Southern Patagonia is the region located to the South of latitude 42 and has been recognized by the O.I.E. as an FMD free area with no vaccination. 

Seroepidemiological Surveillance in 2001: 

A serological survey comprising the Patagonia Regions was conducted in 2001 to determine the presence of the FMD virus. The survey included two studies: one targeted 

the animal population and the other, the operations that, until 2000, received susceptible animals from the northern part of the country at the time the country was recognized 

as FMD free with no vaccination. 

Sampling of the population was conducted in two stages. The prevalence for infected 

herds was estimated at 1% and for infected animals in the herds, at 15%, with a 99% 

confidence level. Both bovines and sheep were sampled as the area is FMD free and 

the animals are not vaccinated. 507 operations and 11,136 animals were sampled. 

Targeted sampling included operations that received susceptible animals between June 

2000 and June 2001. The prevalence estimated for each one of these operations was 

5% with a 95% confidence level (Cannon and Roe, 1982). The sampling included 70 

operations and 3302 animals. Seven of the operations had at least one reactor and 11 

animals that tested positive. Complementary studies confirmed the absence of the FMD 

virus. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

53

Epidemio-Surveillance in 2002: 

Within the framework of the annual National FMD Surveillance System, a serum sampling was conducted in 2002 in the Southern and Northern Patagonia B regions where 

the animals are not vaccinated for FMD. 

DESIGN FOR THE SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN PATAGONIA B REGIONS 

GOAL 

 To rule out the presence of antibodies against non-structural proteins (NSP) of 

the FMD virus (FMDV) in cattle as sheep, as an indicator of infection. 

 The animals in the Regions are not vaccinated. 

 Absence of clinical cases (FMD free area with no vaccination and Surveillance 

Area with no vaccination). 

 Includes the Southern and Northern Patagonia B Regions, identified in the annual sampling as Region C. Each region was subdivided into 5 subregions (C1 to 

C5). See Map 1. 

Species Sampled: bovines (subregions C1 and C2) and sheep (C1, C2, C3, C4 and 

C5). 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

54

Map 1 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

55

Number of samples collected per operation: 

Region C: 

 28 bovines, 6 - 24 months of age 

 28 sheep / goats 

ASSUMPTIONS 

Sampling was conducted in two stages: 

Estimated prevalence of infected operations: 2%. 

Estimated prevalence of infected animals on the operations: 10%. 

Confidence level: 95%. 

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES 

For bovine serum samples: 3 ABC ELISA (screening) and EITB (for confirmation). 

For ovine serum samples: VIAA / AGID tests. 

Criteria to read test results: 

- Positive test result of a bovine sample: a sample that tests positive by 3 

ABC ELISA and EITB. 

- Positive test result of an ovine/caprine sample: a sample that tests positive 

by VIAA. 

- Positive operation: An operation where at least one bovine, or ovine / caprine sample tested positive. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

56

NUMBER OF SAMPLES TESTED 

Table : Total number of samples tested in the Region. 

AREA BOVINES SHEEP / GOATS TOTAL 

C 5,292 17,990 23,282

RESULTS 

Table: Test results for bovines 

AGE GROUP 

SPECIES AREA 6 TO 12 MONTHS 1 TO 2 YEARS 

% PREVALENCE C.I. % PREVALENCE C.I. 

BOVINE C 0.16 0.02 - 0.30 0.34 0.00-0.78

Table: Test results for sheep / goats 

SPECIES AREA % PREVALENCE C.I. 

OVINE / CAPRINE C 0.00 -

Of the 709 operations sampled in both regions, only 9 tested positive (1.3%) with a 95% 

confidence interval between 0.5 and 2.15. 

CONCLUSIONS 

- The samples that were collected and tested served to estimate the parameters 

with a high degree of precision. 

- The absence of viral activity in free areas was confirmed. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

57

SAMPLING IN 2003

Within the framework of the annual sampling for the National FMD Surveillance System, 

a serological sampling of cattle and sheep was conducted in the Southern and Northern 

Patagonia B Regions in 2003. 

GOAL 

To rule out the presence of infection caused by the FMD virus (FMDV) in cattle and 

sheep. 

ASSUMPTIONS (Southern and Northern Patagonia B Regions) 

The sampling was conducted in two stages: 

Estimated prevalence on infected farms: 1% 

Estimated prevalence of infected animals on the farms: 10% 

Confidence level: 95% 

OPERATIONS TO BE SAMPLED 

The design requires sampling of 459 operations in these regions. 

ANIMALS TO BE SAMPLED

Ten sheep of any category and age must be sampled on each operation. In the entire 

region, the total number of animals to be sampled is 4590. 

TESTS 

Samples collected from the animals included in the study in these regions (sheep) must 

be tested with liquid phase ELISA for virus types O1 Campo and A 2001. 

PROGRESS OF THE SAMPLING

At present, the samples are being collected in the field. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

58

IS REPORTING OF SICK ANIMALS MANDATORY, AND IF SO, WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE (BY WHOM AND TO WHOM) AND WHAT PENALTIES ARE INVOLVED 

FOR FAILURE TO REPORT? 

Act # 24,305 requires immediate and mandatory reporting of Foot and Mouth Disease in 

Argentina. As stated in the FMD rules, SENASA has authority to apply severe penalties 

to any individual or company that fails to report an FMD case. 

Awareness among farm owners was clearly demonstrated in March 2001 when over 

300 cases or suspect FMD cases were reported. 

As stated in the Animal Health Law Enforcement Act (# 3959) all veterinarians in private 

practice that work in rural areas (5,752) must report epizootic diseases. In addition, as 

these professionals sit on the board of the technical subcommittees of the Regional and 

Local Animal Health Committees they are highly motivated and support the national 

eradication programs. Private diagnostic laboratories must also immediately report epizootic diseases. Failure to comply with statutory requirements is subject to severe penalties. 

On the farms, the owner or person in charge sees the animals every day. As a result, 

they are well aware of FMD symptoms, reporting requirements, and available resources 

to avoid the disease. Twice a year, the staff of the Local Animal Health Offices visits the 

farms to assist the farmers with the vaccination of cattle. At the time, they physically 

inspect the animals, collect data on the animal population, provide information about 

preventive measures, and generate awareness about the plan, contributing to the efficiency of the surveillance system. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

59

The INTA (National Farming Technology Institute) has a network of Experimental and 

Extension facilities in rural areas that works with the farmers and receives updated information on the health conditions of the herds. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

60

NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND AGRIFOOD QUALITY SERVICE 

(SENASA) 

RISK ANALYSIS UNIT 

QUESTION 10: 

DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY CAPABILITIES 

July 2003 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

61

10- DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY CAPABILITIES 

WHAT DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY CAPABILITIES ARE THERE? 

In Argentina, SENASA has one diagnostic laboratory with biosafety level NBS3 Ag that 

was approved in 1997. The laboratory is authorized to manipulate FMDV and other microorganisms risk 3 or lower, and meets SENASA and O.I.E. biosafety requirements. It 

is located at 1653 Fleming Av., Martínez, Buenos Aires. 

In 2001, the FMD Unit of the Laboratories and Technical Control Office (DILACOT) focused on the sanitary emergency which resulted by the re-importation of the disease in 

2000. 

For the sanitary emergency, the Central Laboratory focused on: 

• Diagnosis. 

• Vaccine control. 

• Serum sampling. 

Diagnosis:

Diagnostic work included testing of all epithelium samples collected from FMD outbreaks and suspect cases of vesicular diseases (there have never been any outbreaks 

in the Patagonic region), typing and identification of actuating strains which, in that year 

were two different type A FMDV strains which, after identification, were named A Argentina 2000 and A Argentina 2001. 

Vaccine Control:

Immunity testing to identify the most appropriate oil-base FMD vaccine for the existing 

emergency conditions. The findings indicated that the vaccine should contain O1 

Campo, A 24 Cruzeiro, A ARGENTINA 2000 and A ARGENTINA 2001. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

62

The Central Laboratory also audited and inspected the critical production points at the 

vaccine manufacturer's facilities, and tested all the series of vaccines used during the 

year, as required in Resolution # 195/01. 

Ninety-three series with a total production of 11,639.277.593 - 2 ml doses of the vaccine 

were tested. 

DILACOT also tested an additional 15 series (16,406,120 doses) that were exported to 

other countries. 

Serum Sampling:

Serum samples of different susceptible species were tested, as required by the 2001 

serum survey designed by the Epidemiology Office to determine the level of viral activity 

and immunity in different regions of the country. 

To determine viral activity, non-structural protein antibodies of the FMDV were tested in 

8810 bovine samples with 3 ABC ELISA and EITB. The protection level in bovines on 

premises with no viral activity was measured in 6215 samples from 494 operations. 

Ovine serum samples (6140 samples) were tested with VIAA to measure viral activity. 

In the 2002 serum survey 42,000 bovine samples and 27,000 ovine samples were 

tested 

Audits:

In 2000, the laboratory was audited by foreign inspectors from the European Union and 

the Pan American FMD Center - PAHO, among others. The scope of the audits included working procedures, quality programs, and biosafety conditions. The findings 

were satisfactory. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

63

ARE THERE LABORATORIES APPROVED FOR AGENT ISOLATION, IDENTIFICATION, AND TYPING? (IF YES, INDICATE THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF 

EACH). 

All tissue, organ, esophageal-pharyngeal fluid, and other samples of suspect cases of 

vesicular diseases must be remitted to SENASA's Central Laboratory (Operational Procedures and Working Instructions Manual - Virology Unit - SENASA 2001. Former 

SENASA Resolution # 219/95 - Annex X). 

WHAT SECURITY MEASURES ARE IN PLACE IN LABORATORIES WITHIN THE 

REGION TO PREVENT ESCAPE OF BIOLOGICAL AGENTS? 

SENASA's laboratory with NBS3 Ag biosafety level includes: 

• Restricted and controlled access; 

• Airtight compartments and mandatory showering; 

• Negative air flow with two HEPA filters; 

• Heat treatment of liquid effluents (100°C during 1 hour); 

• Border autoclave; 

• Airlock with formaldehyde spraying; 

• Category II biosafety booths; 

• Electric energy generator. 

The Argentine biosafety requirements to manipulate the FMD virus are stated in former 

SENASA Resolution # 219/95. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

64

WHAT KIND OF TRAINING HAVE THE DIAGNOSTIC PERSONNEL HAD REGARDING THE SPECIFIC DISEASE AGENTS OF CONCERN? 

The staff of SENASA's Central Laboratory is trained in manipulating and diagnosing the 

FMD virus. The 5 veterinarians and 8 laboratory technicians of the FMD Unit have a 

high level of expertise in diagnosing vesicular diseases and testing FMD vaccines. 

The Virology Advisory Committee was established in 1992. Its members include professionals from the INTA (National Farming Technology Institute) and the Animal Virology 

Center (CEVAN) of the National Council for Technical and Scientific Research (CONICET). The Virology Advisory Committee, that continuously provides support to 

SENASA, has the best technical and human resources in the country. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

65

NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND AGRIFOOD QUALITY SERVICE 

(SENASA) 

RISK ANALYSIS UNIT 

QUESTION 11: 

POLICIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE FOR ANIMAL DISEASE CONTROL IN THE 

REGION, i.e., EMERGENCY RESPONSE CAPACITY 

July 2003 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

66

11- POLICIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE FOR ANIMAL DISEASE CONTROL IN THE 

REGION, i.e., EMERGENCY RESPONSE CAPACITY 

WHAT POLICIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE EXIST FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE 

TO OUTBREAK SITUATIONS? 

The outbreaks which occurred as of October 2001 were managed in accordance with 

an eradication strategy that required stamping out2

, among other measures, to preserve 

the health status of the FMD free areas. All the measures included in the strategy comply with the recommendations stated in the FMD Chapter of the International Animal 

Health Code of the O.I.E. 

By Decree # 394/2001 that updated Decree # 1585/1996, the President of SENASA has 

authority to take prompt actions to respond to emergency situations involving animal 

health. SENASA has special policies, logistics and a budget for zoosanitary and phytosanitary emergency situations. 

The National Animal Health Emergency System (SINAESA) defines the responsibilities 

and functions to control FMD in emergency situations. The SINAESA operates at three 

levels: Central, Regional and Local. 

At the central level, there is a Central Animal Health Emergency Committee that is responsible for describing the emergency scenario, defining the control measures, financing mechanisms and responsibilities, and assigning the human and other resources required for the eradication operations. 

 

2

 Stamping-out is required in risk situations such as: clinical cases of FMD, importation of animals or 

products from infected areas or areas presumed to be infected, inadequate coverage of the vaccine.
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

67

At the regional level, the actions required by SINAESA are carried out by SENASA's 

regional resources. The Regional Animal Health Emergency Team, that is coordinated 

by the Epidemiology Office of DNSA at SENASA headquarters (DNSA Collective # 

30/20), constitutes the functional unit of the system. The team includes SENASA professionals, technicians and administrative staff specialized in responding to emergency 

situations. The members of the team were especially selected for their technical and 

psychophysical profile because, in cases of emergency, they must be continuously 

available and able to respond immediately. An alternate person was appointed for each 

member of this team in the event one member is unable to respond. Each Regional 

Animal Health Emergency Team operates within the jurisdiction of the corresponding 

SENASA Regional Supervisor although, in the event of an emergency, one team may 

provide collaboration to others. 

In all cases, the staff of the Local SENASA Office in the affected area collaborates with 

the group of Field Technicians to provide support. 

The Local SENASA Office is required to: 

1. Provide a primary response to suspect cases (collection and remittance of samples, 

description of the operation, and implementation of preliminary measures). 

2. Notify the Regional Supervisor. 

3. Submit a status report to the Local Animal Health Emergency Committee. 

4. Carry out the actions defined by the chief of operations. 

In addition, the Local SENASA Office must: 

a. Supply updated maps of their area, including cadastre drawings. 
Information provided by SENASA for recognition of Argentina ́s Patagonia as a region as defined in 

Section 92.2, Title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Risk Analysis Unit 

68

b. Keep updated records on the characteristics of the production system in their area, 

including a geographic description. 

c. Keep updated information on local suppliers and service suppliers such as: mobile 

telephone companies, equipment suppliers, transportation and rental companies of said 

equipment, trucks, etc. 

d. Keep updated information on the livestock population, inventory of other products, 

shippers of animal products and byproducts, cattle dealers, other professionals related 

to the farming sector (veterinarians, agronomists, cattle buyers, dairy farm inspectors, 

etc.) 

e. Keep updated records of the local authorities such as: Municipal, Law Enforcement 

Authorities, Fire brigade, veterinarians in private practice, and others in the area). 

f. Oversee the surveillance and repopulation of farming operations. 

Regulatory Framework for Emergency Animal Health Situations: 

In the event of an outbreak of an exotic or endemic disease that represents a hazard for 

the health of the national livestock herd, and if the Official Service determines a stamping-out policy, SENASA's actions and level of involvement are defined in Resolutions # 

1410/2000 and 488/2002. These actions are listed in Resolution # 779/1999 by which 

the National Animal Health Emergency System, as authorized by Act # 24,305 enacted 

in 1993, Decrees # 1585 (1996) and #643 (1996), and the Animal Health Law Enforcement Act (#3959) enacted in 1902, was created.