alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

JEROME CORSI AND LARRY § 

KLAYMAN, § 

PLAINTIFFS, § 

§ 

V. § 

§ 

INFO WARS, LLC; FREE SPEECH § 

SYSTEMS, LLC; ALEX E. JONES; § 

DAVID JONES; OWEN SHROYER; § 

AND ROGER STONE, § 

DEFENDANTS. § 

s) 1 i) a 

FtLEt: 

2121SEP16 PM 3:32 

u Et4A OI' TLXA. 

CAUSE NO. 1:20-CV-298-LY 

Before the court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration filed June 25, 2021 (Doc. #124).' 

Plaintiffs Jerome Corsi and Larry Klayman seek reconsideration of this court's June 25, 2021 order 

adopting the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doe. #122). Plaintiffs also seek 

reconsideration of the court's Final Judgment dismissing Plaintiffs' claims with prejudice for 

failure to state a claim (Doc. #123). 

Motions for reconsideration are made pursuant to Rule 5 9(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. See Templet v. HydroChem Inc., 367 F.3d 473, 478-79 (5th Cir. 2004). Rule 59(e) 

"serve[s] the narrow purpose of allowing a party to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to 

present newly discovered evidence." Waitman v. International Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468, 473 (5th 

Cir. 1989) (internal quotations omitted). Additionally, relief under Rule 59(e) is appropriate when 

there has been an intervening change in the controlling law. Schiller v. Physicians Res. Group, 

Plaintiffs initially filed a "Motion for Reconsideration and Reply to the Infowars 

Defendants' Response to Objections to Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrew 

W. Austin" in a single document. The clerk of this court issued a deficiency notice advising 

Plaintiffs to file the reply separately from the motion for reconsideration. 

Case 1:20-cv-00298-LY-DH Document 155 Filed 09/16/21 Page 1 of 2
Inc., 342 F.3d 563, 567 (5th Cir. 2003). A motion for reconsideration is not the proper vehicle for 

rehashing evidence, legal theories, or arguments that could have been offered or raised before the 

entry of the court's order. See Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1159 (5th Cir. 1990). 

Reconsideration of an order is an extraordinary remedy that should be used sparingly. See Templet, 

367 F.3d at 479. 

Having considered the arguments raised in the motion for reconsideration, the court finds 

that there has been no showing that the court's June 25, 2021 order and final judgment included 

any manifest errors of law or fact or that there has been presented any newly discovered evidence. 

Further, the court concludes that the magistrate judge rendered thorough findings and conclusions 

in the Report and Recommendation, which this court approved and adopted. Thus, the court will 

deny Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration filed June 

25, 2021 (Doc. #124) is DENIED. 

Signed this day of September, 2021. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:20-cv-00298-LY-DH Document 155 Filed 09/16/21 Page 2 of 2
#### STOW v. STATE.

No. 23965.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 10, 1948.

No attorney for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated, punishment assessed at a fine of $50.00.

The complaint and information properly charge the offense. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bill of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT
10.12


 


Second
AMENDMENT TO REAL PROPERTY PURCHASE AND SALE
AGREEMENT


 


THIS
SECOND AMENDMENT TO REAL PROPERTY PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of this 17th day of
August, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), by and between VetaNova, Inc. (“Purchaser”) and GrowCo, Inc. (“Seller”).


 


The
Seller and Purchaser agree to the following:


 


	 	1.	Section
    2.01 of the Agreement is changed to read as follows: The purchase price to be paid by Purchaser to Seller for the Property is Five
    Million (5,000,000) Common Shares, par value $0.0001 of the Company (the “Purchase Price” or “Shares”) and
    cash of $131,579. The shares will be issued in book entry form no later than December 31, 2021. The cash will be paid no later than
    December 31, 2022. The cash amount will bear interest at 6% per year from August 17, 2021 until paid.
	 	2.	The
    Closing Date in Section 5.01 is hereby changed to August 17, 2021.
	 	3.	Section
    5.03 of the Agreement is deleted.
	 	4.	All
    other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.


 


	 	PURCHASER
	 	 
	 	VetaNova
    Inc., a Nevada corporation
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    John McKowen
	 	 	John
McKowen, President and CEO
	 	 	 
	 	SELLER
	 	 
	 	GrowCo,
    Inc., a Colorado corporation
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    John McKowen
	 	 	John
    McKowen, CEO
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1257, -1266 DORBEST LIMITED, RUI FENG WOODWORK (DONGGUAN) CO., LTD., and RUI FENG LUMBER DEVELOPMENT (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and AMERICAN FURNITURE MANUFACTURERS COMMITTEE FOR LEGAL TRADE,

and VAUGHAN-BASSETT FURNITURE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and CABINET MAKERS, MILLMEN AND INDUSTRIAL CARPENTERS LOCAL 721, UBC SOUTHERN COUNCIL OF INDUSTRIAL WORKERS LOCAL 2305, UNITED STEEL WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 193U, CARPENTERS INDUSTRIAL UNION LOCAL 2093, TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS LOCAL 991,

and IUE INDUSTRIAL DIVISION OF CWA LOCAL 82472, Plaintiffs,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee, and DONGGUAN LUNG DONG and DON HE,

Defendants-Appellees, and ART HERITAGE INTERNATIONAL LTD., SUPER ART FURNITURE CO., LTD., ARTWORK METAL & PLASTIC CO., LTD., JIBSON INDUSTRIES LTD., ALWAYS LOYAL INTERNATIONAL, FORTUNE GLORY LTD. (HK LTD.), NANHAI JIANTAI WOODWORK CO., FINE FURNITURE (SHANGHAI) LTD., COASTER

COMPANY OF AMERICA, COLLEZIONE EUROPA USA, INC.,FINE FURNITURE DESIGN & MARKETING LLC, GLOBAL FURNITURES, INC.,

HILLSDALE FURNITURE, LLC, KLAUSSNER INTERNATIONAL, LLC, MAGNUSSEN HOME FURNISHINGS, INC., L. POWELL COMPANY,

RIVERSEDGE FURNITURE COMPANY, WOODSTUFF MANUFACTURING, INC. (doing business as Samuel Lawrence),

SCHNADIG CORPORATION, GOOD COMPANIES, and STANDARD FURNITURE MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in case no. 05-00003, Judge Donald C. Pogue.

ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the appellants' unopposed motion for a 14 day extension of time, until June 1, 2009, to file their opening briefs, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT



### MAY - 7 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date Jan Horbaly Clerk Mita

# lar

UIT POR

cc: J. Michael Taylor, Esq. Jeffrey S. Grimson, Esq. Kristin Heim Mowry, Esq. Robert G. Gosselink, Esq. Carrie A. Dunsmore, Esq. s8 MAY 

### -7 2009 JAW HORBALY CLERK

- 2 - 2009-1257, -1266
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, William Fox,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K,and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reportsfiled in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual reportof Lehman ABS Corporation, on behalf of Corporate Backed Trust Certificates,Motorola Debenture-Backed Series 2002-14 Trust****(the“Trust”);

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, the information in thesereports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicinginformation required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under thepooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports isincluded in these reports; and

 

4.               I am responsible for reviewing the activitiesperformed by the Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing, orsimilar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance reviewrequired under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, theDepositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National Association, asTrustee.

 

Date:  July 22, 2009

 

 
| By:    | /s/ William Fox |                                     |
|--------|-----------------|------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:           | William Fox                              |   |
|   | Title:          | Chief Financial  Officer, Controller and |   |
|   |            | Senior Vice President                    |   |

 

----
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**Annual Servicer Compliance Certificate**

**pursuant to**

**Section 3.9 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement**

**and**

**Item 1123 ofRegulation AB**

 

 

USAA AUTO OWNER TRUST 2016-1

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer ofUSAA Federal Savings Bank, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 21, 2016 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time totime, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), by and among USAA Auto Owner Trust 2016-1, USAA Acceptance, LLC, the Servicer and U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee, does herebycertify that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 throughDecember 31, 2018, and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was conducted under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in allmaterial respects under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout such period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executedthis Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this 27th day of March, 2019. 

 
/s/ Brett Seybold
Name: Brett Seybold

Title:  Senior Vice President-Treasurer and

           Senior Officer in Charge ofSecuritization
**
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2860 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2860

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 15, 2014

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the Inspector 
 General of the Office of Personnel Management may use amounts in the 
   revolving fund of the Office to fund audits, investigations, and 
             oversight activities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``OPM IG Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT REVOLVING FUND FOR 
              AUDITS, INVESTIGATIONS, AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES.

    Subsection (e) of section 1304 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by adding before the period at the 
        end of the first sentence the following: ``, and for the cost 
        of audits, investigations, and oversight activities, conducted 
        by the Inspector General of the Office, of the fund and the 
        activities financed by the fund''; and
            (2) in paragraph (5)--
                    (A) by striking ``The Office'' and inserting ``(A) 
                The Office''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) Such budget shall include an estimate from the 
        Inspector General of the Office of the amount required to pay 
        the expenses to audit, investigate, and provide other oversight 
        activities with respect to the fund and the activities financed 
        by the fund.
            ``(C) The amount requested by the Inspector General under 
        subparagraph (B) shall not exceed .33 percent of the total 
        budgetary authority requested by the Office under subparagraph 
        (A).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 14, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
|   | (1) | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-127966), pertaining to the 2002 Stock Plan,      2005 Equity Incentive Plan, and 2005 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option      Plan of Hoku Scientific, Inc.; |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-150855), pertaining to a $110 million offering      of common stock, preferred stock, warrants, senior debt securities and      subordinated debt securities of Hoku Scientific,  Inc; |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (3) | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-149599), pertaining to an offering of      2,893,519 shares of common stock of Hoku Scientific, Inc.;    and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 333-144465), pertaining to the 2005 Equity Incentive      Plan and the 2005 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan of Hoku      Scientific, Inc. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (5) | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 333-151895), pertaining to the 2005 Equity Incentive      Plan and the 2005 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan of Hoku      Scientific, Inc. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Washington F., Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Dwyer, J.), rendered May 31, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and the facts, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence is granted, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.

At the suppression hearing, the People’s sole witness was the arresting officer, who testified, in relevant part, that the defendant was arrested based on a radio bulletin from an undercover police officer. According to the arresting officer, during the undercover police officer’s radio transmission, she stated that she had observed the defendant, who was carrying a small brown paper bag, hand "something out” to another individual, who gave some money to the defendant. Contrary to the hearing court’s determination, the transmitted description of the transaction, which took place in a drug-prone location, did not provide the "requisite assurance that the observer ha[d] witnessed an illicit [drug] dealing rather than an innocent encounter” *(People v McRay,*51 NY2d 594, 604; *see, People v Batista,*156 AD2d 455; *People v Mills,*145 AD2d 578). The cases relied upon by the hearing court are clearly distinguishable since in those cases, the police officers had observed a "tell-tale” sign of a drug transaction under attendant circumstances which gave rise to a conclusion that an illegal drug transaction had taken place *(see, People v McRay, supra; People v Bittner,*97 AD2d 33). In this case, in addition *555to the fact that the undercover officer did not relay to the arresting officer that she had observed a "tell-tale” sign of a drug transaction, the attendant circumstances testified to at the suppression hearing did not give rise to a conclusion that an illegal drug transaction had taken place.

Since the People failed to present sufficient proof that the defendant’s arrest was based on probable cause, the defendant’s application to suppress the drugs found on his person by the arresting officer should have been granted, and the indictment dismissed.

In light of our determination, we need not address the defendant’s other contentions. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.9


 


SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT


 


TO:      The Director of Blockchain Moon Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”).


 


The undersigned hereby subscribes for 2,875,000 shares of common stock,
par value $0.0001 per share (the “Shares”) of the Company. In consideration for the issue of the Shares, the undersigned hereby
agrees and undertakes to pay $25,000 to the Company.


 


The undersigned agrees to take the Shares subject to the Certificate
of Incorporation of the Company and authorizes you to enter the following name and address in the stockholder ledger of the Company:


 


	 	Name:	Jupiter Sponsor LLC
	 	 	 
		Address:	c/o Alpha Sigma Capital, 4651 Salisbury Road, Suite 400, Jacksonville FL, 32256



 


	Jupiter Sponsor LLC	 
	 	 
	Signed:	/s/ Fiorenzo A. Villani	 
	Name:	Fiorenzo A. Villani	 




 


 


Dated:     February 3 , 2021


 


Accepted:


 


	Blockchain Moon Acquisition Corp.	 
	 	 
	Signed:	/s/ Fiorenzo A. Villani	 
	Name:	 Fiorenzo A. Villani	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 




 


 


Dated:     February 3 , 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          68,257
<SECURITIES>                                    25,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  327,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,999
<INVENTORY>                                    248,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               675,578
<PP&E>                                       1,078,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                 621,529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,590,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          368,160
<BONDS>                                        510,229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        797
<COMMON>                                        10,915
<OTHER-SE>                                     575,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,590,861
<SALES>                                      1,158,119
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,158,119
<CGS>                                          934,666
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,096,476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (7,283)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,464
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,129
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,729
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.18
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00737

- CR

Susan WILCUT

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 398965

Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED May 6, 2015.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice