alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5631 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5631

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rolling travel bags with a 
                     removable backpack or daypack.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

  Mr. Polis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rolling travel bags with a 
                     removable backpack or daypack.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ROLLING TRAVEL BAGS WITH A REMOVABLE BACKPACK OR 
              DAYPACK.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Travel bags of      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          manmade fibers,                                                   12/31/2015
                          with wheels, a
                          telescoping
                          handle, stowable
                          shoulder straps,
                          and a removable
                          separate backpack
                          or daypack
                          attached by
                          zipper or other
                          means, valued
                          over $30, not to
                          exceed 85 liters
                          in volume, and
                          removable
                          separate backpack
                          or daypack not to
                          exceed 26 liters
                          in volume
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          4202.12.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5648 

To repeal an obsolete provision in title 49, United States Code, requiring 

motor vehicle insurance cost reporting. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. OWENS (for himself and Mr. HARPER) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal an obsolete provision in title 49, United States 

Code, requiring motor vehicle insurance cost reporting. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL. 

4 Section 32302(c) of title 49, United States Code, is 

5 repealed. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Ex parte CARSON.

No. 23237.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 17, 1945.

Baskett & Parks, of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Mrs. Carson and Mrs. Jordan lived in adjoining houses but the evidence indicates that they were not neighborly. In August, 1944 Mrs. Jordan filed with a justice of the peace an affidavit seeking to have Mrs. Carson put under a peace bond. Officers were called and investigated the circumstances upon which the affidavit was predicated, but made no arrest. The magistrate had no trial upon such affidavit until in May, 1945. Nine months had elapsed during which time Mrs. Carson was under no restraint so far as any peace bond would have effected. Upon the trial in May, 1945, the magistrate required relator to give a peace bond in the sum of $10,000. In default of such bond she was placed in jail, whereupon she applied to the district judge for a writ of habeas corpus asking release upon the ground that the evidence did not warrant the requirement of a peace bond. Upon a hearing the district judge declined to discharge relator but required of her a peace bond in the sum of $2,000. From such order this appeal was taken.

It would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state to recite the evidence which re-fleets an unhappy situation beween people whom circumstances had made neighbors. We have reviewed the evidence and think it fails to meet the requirements demanded under Arts. 79 and 80, C.C.P., as construed in Ex parte Schmidt, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 303, 167 S.W.2d 1026; Ex parte Allen, 113 Tex.Cr.R. 73, 19 S.W.2d 58; Ex parte Wilkerson, 102 Tex.Cr.R. 336, 278 S.W. 426.

The judgment is reversed and relator is ordered discharged.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5622 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Captan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. LATHAM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Captan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPTAN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 N-((Trichloromethyl)thio)- 

4-cyclohexene-1,2- 

dicarboximide (Captan) 

(CAS No. 133–06–2) and 

formulations thereof (provided for in subheadings 

2930.90.43 and 

3808.92.15) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5622 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1343-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Ohio, (FEMA-1343-DR), dated September 26, 2000, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 4, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster for the State of Ohio is hereby amended to include Public Assistance for the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 26, 2000: 

Greene County for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance). 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

James L. Witt, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 00-26532 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit 10.41  vertis  To:
  
  [Named
  Individual]From:
  
  Don RolandDate:
  
  March 3,
  2004Re:
  
  Fiscal Year
  2004 EIP  memo I am pleased
to confirm your participation in the Vertis 2004 Executive Incentive Plan.  Your personal EIP target incentive is
    % of your base salary as of December 31, 2004.  In 2004, we
are implementing a solid business plan focused on revenue generation, margin
improvement and operational excellence. 
Our strong leadership team is one of our most important strategic advantages.
As a member of that team, you set an example of the commitment and leadership
that will enable Vertis to meet and exceed our 2004 goals. We are united in our
commitment to be world class in everything we do, and in our determination to
live the Vertis Vision.  Consistent
with our 2004 business plan and the Vertis Vision, we are implementing a single
incentive plan for all Vertis EIP participants in 2004.  The plan is based on corporate-wide EBITDA,
which must improve significantly as we recover from last years significant
declines.  This is a change from last
years plan which had other components in addition to EBITDA.  2004 EBITDA Target  100%
of your EIP incentive will be based on Vertis EBITDA, Earnings Before
Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization  before EIP.  The companys
EBITDA target for which you will achieve 100% or your incentive (before EIP) is
$224.0 million.  If
Vertis EBITDA for 2004 is 90% of target or below, there will be no EBITDA
payout.  For
approximately every 1% of EBITDA achieved over 90%, the plan will pay out 10%,
up to 200% maximum at 110.7% of the EBITDA target.  250 West
  Pratt Street
  18th
  Floor
  Baltimore,
  MD 21201
  T
  [410.528.9800]
  F
  [410.528.9287]
  www.vertisinc.com
  [VERTIS LOGO]
  The center of targeted
  advertising and marketing  
   Our Executive
Incentive Plan design aligns with our One Vertis concept.  The plan rewards overall achievement through
the efforts of the entire leadership team. 
As part of that team, you play a major role in influencing others and in
ensuring the companys success.  Thank
you for your commitment to our vision and for your diligence in working toward
our goals.  2004 Plan Payout Chart:  EBITDA
  ComponentAttainment
  to
  Goal
  
  % Payout90.0%
  
  0%90.9%
  
  10%91.9%
  
  20%92.8%
  
  30%93.7%
  
  40%94.6%
  
  50%95.7%
  
  60%96.8%
  
  70%97.9%
  
  80%98.9%
  
  90%100.0%
  
  100%101.1%
  
  110%102.1%
  
  120%103.2%
  
  130%104.3%
  
  140%105.4%
  
  150%106.4%
  
  160%107.5%
  
  170%108.6%
  
  180%109.6%
  
  190%110.7%
  
  200%
  2
**Promissory
      Note**





$96,000.00
            June
                16,
                2005








For
      value
      received, **ST.
      JOSEPH, INC.** ,
      of
      Tulsa, Oklahoma, (herein referred to as ‘maker’) promises to pay to the order of **JOHN
      H. SIMMONS** ,
      (herein
      referred to as ‘payee’) at such place within Denton County, Texas as payee
      designates in writing, in lawful money of the United States of America, the
      principal sum of Ninety-Six Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($96,000).





Payment
      of this note shall be as follows: The $96,000 loan will bear a 10% per annum
      interest rate paid quarterly. Loan will be repaid by St. Joseph, Inc. at its
      discretion on or before June 16, 2006.





Maker
      may
      prepay this note in whole or in whole or in part with out penalty or surcharge
      at any time prior to the maturity date.





Maker
      hereby severally waives presentment for payment, notices of nonpayment, protest
      and notice of protest, and agrees that extensions of the time for payment may
      be
      granted without notice. In case of legal proceedings to collect this note,
      maker
      agrees to pay all court costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, to payee as
      prevailing parties in the suit.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is signed this 16 th day of
      June 2005




/s/
              Kenneth L. JohnsonKenneth L. Johnson, SecretarySt. Joseph, Inc.4870 S. Lewis, Ste. 250Tulsa,
                OK 74105
**Exhibit 32**

 

**NORTHERN GROWERS, LLC**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

Theundersigned, Robert Narem, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief FinancialOfficer of Northern Growers, LLC (the “Company”), has executed thisCertification in connection with the filing with the Securities and ExchangeCommission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2005 (the “Report”).

 

Theundersigned hereby certifies that:

 

•                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

•                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 16thday of March, 2006.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert  Narem                                     |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert  Narem                                         |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

1

----
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 96-3686

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United

* States District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Vincent B. Edwards, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

Submitted: June 10, 1997

Filed: June 24, 1997

_____________

Before BOWMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Vincent B. Edwards appeals his convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) for

being a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition. He contends that the search

of his vehicle and the seizure of the guns and ammunition during a traffic stop violated

his Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights and that the trial court erred by admitting Rule

404(b) evidence of his presence at a gun show three months prior to his arrest.
The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendation of The

Honorable David D. Noce, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of

Missouri.

-2-

We conclude that the District Court did not err in determining that Edwards

1

voluntarily consented to the search of his vehicle and that Edwards's motion to suppress

the seized evidence should be denied. We also conclude that the District Court did not

abuse its discretion in admitting the Rule 404(b) evidence. Accordingly, the challenged

convictions are 

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000590

30-AUG-2017

08:37 AM
#### SPARREN v. STATE.

No. 26405.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 29, 1953.

No attorney for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State-.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our re-viewf the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 15

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have conducted a review of the condensed consolidated financial statements of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2008 and for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and issued our report thereon dated October 24, 2008. We are aware
that such financial statements and our above-mentioned report appearing in the Form 10-Q of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 are being incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(File No. 33-105906, effective June 6, 2003) and that such report pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 is not considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of
Paragraphs 7 and 11 of that Act.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
|                      
|Tampa, Florida        
|October 24, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                   175,130
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,822,130
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              4,810,209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         7,587,987
<PP&E>                                   3,728,418
<DEPRECIATION>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           20,996,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,402,092
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                                 2,568
<OTHER-SE>                               11,480,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             20,996,606
<SALES>                                  8,227,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         8,227,525
<CGS>                                    5,139,564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            3,476,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       272,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (660,561)
<INCOME-TAX>                             (185,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (475,561)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                             (475,561)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (.19)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
13.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C.
§1350,
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of YM BioSciences Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
20-F for the year ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David G.P. Allan, Chairman and
CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:
  (1)           The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           The information
contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  March 3,
      2010
              
              /s/
      David G. P. AllanDavid
      G. P. AllanChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, James M. Papada, III, Chief Executive Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 1, 2005
      (the "Periodic Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Technitrol, Inc.

Dated: May 4, 2005
       -----------

                                        /s/ James M. Papada, III
                                        ------------------------
                                        James M. Papada, III

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be
retained by Technitrol, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of
the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Stephan Co. (the
"Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, David Spiegel, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



/s/ David A. Spiegel
__________________________________
David A. Spiegel
Chief Financial Officer
May 21, 2007