alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26721]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-04003]

Wallowa Forest Products, Wallowa, Oregon; Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reopening

    On August 22, 2000, the Department issued a Negative Determination 
Regarding Worker Eligibility to apply for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance applicable to workers of Wallowa Forest Products, Wallowa, 
Oregon. The notice was published in the Federal Register on September 
12, 2000 (65 FR 55050).
    By letters of September 21 and October 5, 2000, the company 
requested administrative reconsideration regarding the Department's 
denial and provided information about customer purchases of imported 
stud lumber that the Department had not previously considered.
    Workers at the subject firm were engaged in employment related to 
the production of stud lumber. The workers are not separately 
identifiable by product line.
    Sales, production and employment at the Wallowa facility declined 
during the relevant time period; the facility closed in June 2000.
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
because there was no shift in production to Mexico or Canada and the 
company did not purchase imported stud lumber from Mexico or Canada. In 
addition, the Department conducted a survey of major customers which 
revealed that customers of the subject firm were not increasing their 
purchases of imported stud lumber.
    The customer information provided by the company in its request for 
administrative reconsideration, and verified by the Department, revels 
that a major customer increased purchases of imported stud lumber from 
Canada while reducing purchases from the subject firm.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the facts obtained on reconsideration, I 
conclude that increased imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with stud lumber contributed importantly to the declines in 
sales or production and to the total or partial separation of workers 
of Wallowa Forest Products, Wallowa, Oregon. In accordance with the 
provisions of the Trade Act, I make the following certification:

    ``All workers of Wallowa Forest Products, Wallowa, Oregon who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
June 27, 1999 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 
of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 6th day of October 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-26721 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
#### KEETON v. STATE.

No. 26833.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 17, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for selling whisky in a dry area; the punishment, thirty days in jail.

The information charges only that appellant did, in a dry area, “sell whiskey.”

The name of the alleged purchaser is not stated, nor is there an allegation that the purchaser was unknown.

Such an information is fatally defective. Barnett v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 396, 242 *738S.W.2d 885; Wilson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 242 S.W.2d 886; Arts. 406 and 416, C.C.P.

The information being fatally defective, a conviction may not be predicated thereon.

The judgment is reversed and .the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,that:

 

(1) The accompanyingAnnual Report on Form10-KSB for the period ended November 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date:  February 27, 2004 |   | /s/ Michael J. Aylesworth        |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Michael J. Aylesworth            |
|                          |   | President                        |
|                          |   | (*Principal Executive Officer*)  |
|                          |   |                             |
|                          |   |                             |
| Date:  February 27, 2004 |   | /s/ Kenneth L. Torbet            |   |
|                          |   | Kenneth L. Torbet                |
|                          |   | Treasurer                        |
|                          |   | (*Principal  Financial Officer*) |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Navstar Media
Holding, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ranny Liang, Executive Chairwoman of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Ranny Liang Ranny Liang 

Executive Chairwoman       

Date:  July 10, 2006

---
**Exhibit 99.5**

 

**Consent of Meyers Norris Penny LLP, CharteredAccountants**

 

To the Boardof Directors

CANADIANSUPERIOR ENERGY INC.

 

Dears Sirs:

 

We herebyconsent to the use in this Annual Report on form 40-F of Canadian SuperiorEnergy Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005 of our report dated March 10,2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Canadian SuperiorEnergy Inc., as at and for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 
| /s/ MEYERS  NORRIS PENNY LLP |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| MEYERS  NORRIS PENNY LLP     |
| Chartered  Accountants       |

 

Calgary,Canada

March 31, 2006

 

----
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Storage Technology Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 27, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Patrick J. Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Patrick J. Martin
---------------------
Patrick J. Martin
Chief Executive Officer
November 11, 2002
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Dennis OBrien, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Silver Mines, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-a5(f)) for the Registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within this entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 13, 2008

By:    _/s/ Dennis OBrien



Dennis OBrien, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer



---
Filed 9/20/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2017 ND 226

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Jake Wyatt Doornek, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20170020

City of Grand Forks, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Jake Wyatt Doornek, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20170027

Appeals from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald Hager, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Haley L. Wamstad (argued), Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee State of North Dakota.

Kristi P. Venhuizen (on brief), City Prosecutor, Grand Forks, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee City of Grand Forks.

Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, N.D., for defendant and appellant.

State v. Doornek

Nos. 20170020 and 20170027

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Jake Doornek appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of one count of theft of property and two counts of assaulting a peace officer.  Doornek argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to sever the trial of the theft charge from the trial of the assault charges, a motion he did not renew at the close of evidence.  Doornek failed to meet his burden under N.D.R.Crim.P. 52(b).  See State v. Neufeld, 1998 ND 103, ¶ 15, 578 N.W.2d 536 (“Severance is only required when a defendant has made a convincing showing he has both important testimony to give concerning one count and a strong need to refrain from testifying in another.”); see also State v. Tresenriter, 2012 ND 240, ¶ 12, 823 N.W.2d 774 (noting that to “constitute obvious error, the error must be a clear deviation from an applicable legal rule under current law”).  Doornek also argues that the district court erred by denying his motion for acquittal.  We conclude that sufficient evidence exists in the record to sustain his conviction.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10840 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARIO ALBERTO PAZZI-DE HOYOS, Defendant-Appellant.

Consolidated with No. 06-10841 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARIO ALBERTO PAZZI-DE HOYOS, also known as Mario Alberto Mendoza-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-53-ALL USDC No. 5:06-CR-13-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *No. 06-10840 c/w No. 06-10841 -2- Mario Alberto Pazzi-De Hoyos pleaded guilty to illegal entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pazzi-De Hoyos’ supervised release with respect to a prior conviction was also revoked. Pazzi-De Hoyos appeals his conviction and revocation, arguing that (1) venue in the Northern District of Texas was improper with respect to his illegal reentry guilty plea conviction and (2) the district court erred when it used his prior aggravated felony conviction to enhance his illegal reentry
sentence. Pazzi-De Hoyos’ physical presence as well as the illegal status of his presence was discovered by immigration authorities when he was within the Northern District of Texas. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1326, venue was proper in the Northern District. See United States v. Asibor , 109 F.3d 1023, 1037 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Santana-Castellano , 74 F.3d 593, 598 ( 5th Cir. 1996). Pazzi-De Hoyos also challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. Pazzi-De Hoyos’ constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Pazzi-De Hoyos contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we haveNo. 06-10840 c/w No. 06-10841 -3- repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that AlmendarezTorres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 41 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir. 2005). Pazzi-De Hoyos properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 13.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Annual Report of First Point Minerals Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Teresa Cheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Teresa Cheng Teresa Cheng Chief Financial Officer September 29, 2006
aitta

NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.'



### A-Lt At..771. 1 , C.J. Hardesty CI.S trw , J. Parraguirre 

# AdeutU f , J. Pickering cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Gordon Silver Eighth District Court Clerk 'In light of this order, we vacate our January 8, 2015, order granting a temporary stay. We also necessarily deny as moot petitioner's stay request, real party in interest's January 23, 2015, motion, and petitioner's January 26, 2015, motion.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
#### S. E. WADE et ux. v. EDWARDS et al.

No. 14109.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

July 8, 1949.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 16, 1949.

Ruth Felton Muir and Jerome Chamberlain, both of Dallas, for appellants.

Andress & Ramsey, of Dallas, for appel-lees.

YOUNG, Justice.

This is an appeal from a temporary mandatory injunction. It appears that in April 1948, appellants sold to appellee Varina Hawkins Derrick, a widow, a house and lot located at 4000 Bowser Avenue for the sum •of $23,500, payable $3,500 cash, and two notes, a first lien for $14,000 payable to Acacia Mutual Life Insurance Company, .the proceeds of which were to be delivered to appellants; and a second lien for $6,000 payable to Jewell Wade, appellant. In paying the proceeds of the $14,000 note, Acacia retained $2,000 under a written memorandum, until appellee Varina Hawkins Derrick made certain repairs.

After a controversy arose between the parties to this action, appellants filed suit August 2, 1948 for debt and foreclosure, based on the balance due on the $6,000 second lien note and the alleged failure of appellee to make the repairs necessary to release the $2,000 held by Acacia to the appellant Jewell Wade. Appellees, Mrs. J. C. Edwards, nee Varina Hawkins Derrick, and her husband, J. C.' Edwards, filed an amended answer December 23, 1948, seeking affirmatively a rescission of the original sale as well as other relief.

On March 22, 1949 appellees filed motion for an injunction, in substance setting up that at the inception of the suit they were in possession of the property involved; that about March 16, 1949, because of the pregnancy of Varina Edwards, they temporarily vacated one of the apartments in the house involved and went to her mother’s in Fort Worth; that, at the same time, they had rented the apartment to another family, and such other family was to occupy the space by moving in the next day; that before the other family moved in, appellants forcibly entered such apartment and at time of the filing of the motion were .occupying same, threatening appellees, etc.; and prayed for a mandatory injunction to vacate the premises and restore the status quo; and for injunction against re-entry pending final hearing.

Prior to the instant suit, defendants had acquired actual possession of the property in controversy by purchase from Wade. This constituted the status quo, as between the parties, which appellants appear to have disturbed during the litigation and which the trial court has merely seen fit to restore pending final disposition of the cause. In the ruling made, though mandatory in effect, requiring such status to be preserved pendente lite we find no abuse of discretion on part of the district court. The judgment under review is therefore in all things affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN TCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              51
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      382
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          10,654
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         12,643
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              232
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       (462)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,290
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,987
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   724
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (32)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        41
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (73)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (73)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>