EXHIBIT K

Case 6:20-cv-00453-ADA Document 1-11 Filed 06/01/20 Page 1 of 9
U.S. Patent No. 10,375,215 – Google LLC 

Claim 1 

Jenam Tech LLC (“Jenam”) provides evidence of infringement of Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 10,375,215 (her

Google LLC (“Google”). In support thereof, Jenam provides the following claim charts. 

“Accused Instrumentalities” as used herein refers to at least one or more websites or web addresses in

www.google.com, stored and/or hosted on one or more servers owned or under the control of Google. These claim infringement, and provide notice of such infringement, by comparing each element of the asserted claims to correspondinfeatures of the Accused Instrumentalities. These claim charts are not intended to constitute an expert report on infrininclude information provided by way of example, and not by way of limitation. 

The analysis set forth below is based only upon information from publicly available resources regarding the Infringin

Google has not yet provided any non-public information. An analysis of Google’s (or other third parties’) technical docsource code may assist in fully identify all infringing features and functionality. Accordingly, Jenam reserves the right tinfringement analysis once such information is made available to Jenam. Furthermore, Jenam reserves the right to revisas appropriate, upon issuance of a court order construing any terms recited in the asserted claims. 

 Unless otherwise noted, Jenam contends that Google directly infringes the ’215 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 

to sell, making, using, and/or importing the Infringing Instrumentalities. The following exemplary analysis demonstrate

otherwise noted, Jenam further contends that the evidence below supports a finding of indirect infringement under 35 Uconjunction with other evidence of liability under one or more of those subsections. Google makes, uses, sells, imports

United States, or has made, used, sold, imported, or offered for sale in the past, without authority, or induces others to m

for sale in the United States, or has induced others to make, use, sell, import, or offer for sale in the past, without authoriservices that infringe Claim 1 of the ’215 patent, including without limitation, the Accused Instrumentalities. 

 Unless otherwise noted, Jenam believes and contends that each element of each claim asserted herein is literally 

provision of the Infringing Instrumentalities. However, to the extent that Google attempts to allege that any asserted cla

met, Jenam believes and contends that such elements are met under the doctrine of equivalents. More specifically, in its the Infringing Instrumentalities, Jenam did not identify any substantial differences between the elements of the patent cla

features of the Infringing Instrumentalities, as set forth herein. In each instance, the identified feature of the Infringing I

least substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve substantially the same result as the corresp

To the extent the chart of an asserted claim relies on evidence about certain specifically-identified Accused In

that, on information and belief, any similarly-functioning instrumentalities also infringes the charted claim. Jenam res

infringement analysis based on other products made, used, sold, imported, or offered for sale by Google. Jenam also reinfringement analysis by citing other claims of the ’215 patent, not listed in the claim chart, that are infringed by the Accufurther reserves the right to amend this infringement analysis by adding, subtracting, or otherwise modifying content in thcolumn of each chart. 

Case 6:20-cv-00453-ADA Document 1-11 Filed 06/01/20 Page 2 of 9
CLAIM CHARTS

BASED ON INFRINGEMENT ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE

U.S. Patent No. 10,375,215

2 of 8

June 1, 2020

Claim 1 Accused Instrumentalities

A computer‐implemented method,

comprising: at a server node:causing data to be sent to a client

node; and providing access, to the

client node, to code that, in

response to being used by the

client node, causes the client node

to:

receive, by the client node, a

transmission control protocol

(TCP)‐variant packet,

Google owns or controls a server node that performs a method including: at the se

data (e.g., in HTML pages, etc.) to be sent to a client node (e.g., device that receive

etc.); and providing access, to the client node, to code (e.g., also in the HTML page

response to being used by the client node, causes the client node to carry out the 

functionality. Specifically, Google incorporates code into their HTML pages that, w

node, causes the client node to communicate with one or more servers using the Q

See excerpt(s) below, for example (emphasis added, if any):

Note: Below is a web page of Google (https://www.google.com/) .

Case 6:20-cv-00453-ADA Document 1-11 Filed 06/01/20 Page 3 of 9
CLAIM CHARTS

BASED ON INFRINGEMENT ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE

U.S. Patent No. 10,375,215

3 of 8

June 1, 2020

Note: As set forth below, QUIC is a “variant” of TCP.

“On the surface, QUIC is very similar to TCP+TLS+HTTP/2 implemented on UDP. ...

built on top of UDP, it suffers from no such limitations.” https://www.chromium.o

Note: As set forth below, a QUIC negotiation packet is received by the client node 

Note: As set forth below, prior to a QUIC connection being established, the QUIC c

using the aforementioned handshake.

Case 6:20-cv-00453-ADA Document 1-11 Filed 06/01/20 Page 4 of 9
CLAIM CHARTS

BASED ON INFRINGEMENT ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE

U.S. Patent No. 10,375,215

4 of 8

June 1, 2020

detect an idle time period

parameter field in the TCP‐variant

packet;

Google owns or controls the server node that performs the method including: at t

providing access, to the client node, to the code (e.g., in the HTML pages, etc.) tha

used by the client node, causes the client node to: detect an idle time period para

timeout parameter field, etc.) in the TCP‐variant packet (e.g., QUIC negotiation pa

See excerpt(s) below, for example (emphasis added, if any):

Note: As set forth below, a QUIC negotiation packet includes transport parameter

timeout parameter that is detected by a recipient of such packet.

Case 6:20-cv-00453-ADA Document 1-11 Filed 06/01/20 Page 5 of 9
CLAIM CHARTS

BASED ON INFRINGEMENT ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE

U.S. Patent No. 10,375,215

5 of 8

June 1, 2020

Case 6:20-cv-00453-ADA Document 1-11 Filed 06/01/20 Page 6 of 9
CLAIM CHARTS

BASED ON INFRINGEMENT ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE

U.S. Patent No. 10,375,215

6 of 8

June 1, 2020

identify metadata in the idle time

period parameter field for an idle

time period, during which, no

packet is communicated in a TCP‐variant connection to keep the

TCP‐variant connection active; and

Google owns or controls the server node that performs the method including: at t

providing access, to the client node, to the code (e.g., in the HTML pages, etc.) tha

used by the client node, causes the client node to: identify metadata (e.g., a value

period parameter field (e.g., idle timeout parameter field, etc.) for an idle time pe

packet is communicated in a TCP‐variant connection to keep the TCP‐variant conn

See excerpt(s) below, for example (emphasis added, if any):

Note: As set forth below, the metadata includes a value in seconds that is encoded 

integer.

Note: As set forth below, there is “no activity” while the connection is idle.

Case 6:20-cv-00453-ADA Document 1-11 Filed 06/01/20 Page 7 of 9
CLAIM CHARTS

BASED ON INFRINGEMENT ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE

U.S. Patent No. 10,375,215

7 of 8

June 1, 2020

determine, based on the metadata,

a timeout attribute associated with

the TCP‐variant connection.

Google owns or controls the server node that performs the method including: at t

providing access, to the client node, to the code (e.g., in the HTML pages, etc.) tha

used by the client node, causes the client node to: determine, based on the metad

the idle timeout parameter field, etc.), a timeout attribute associated with the TCP

See excerpt(s) below, for example (emphasis added, if any):

Note: As set forth below, since the idle_timeout value sets the duration of idlenes

connection is shutdown, a timeout attribute of the connection is necessarily modif

value received in the idle_timeout field of the connection negotiation packet.

Case 6:20-cv-00453-ADA Document 1-11 Filed 06/01/20 Page 8 of 9
CLAIM CHARTS

BASED ON INFRINGEMENT ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE

U.S. Patent No. 10,375,215

8 of 8

June 1, 2020

Caveat: The notes and/or cited excerpts utilized herein are set forth for illustrative purposes only and are not meant to be 

For example, the notes and/or cited excerpts, may or may not be supplemented or substituted with different exc

reference(s), as appropriate. Further, to the extent any error(s) and/or omission(s) exist herein, all rights are reserved 

connection with any subsequent correlations.

Case 6:20-cv-00453-ADA Document 1-11 Filed 06/01/20 Page 9 of 9