alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

|   |
|--------|

 

| In connection with the annual report of Pathmark Stores, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John T. Standley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
| A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.                                                |

 

 

 

|   |       | **/s/ John T. Standley**    |
|--------|------------|-----------------------------|
|   |       |                        |   |
|   | **Name:**  | **John T. Standley**        |
|   | **Title:** | *Chief Executive Officer*** |
|   | **Date:**  | April 19, 2007              |
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(Nos. 333-127957 and 333-122668) and Form S-8 (No. 333-117251)of K-Sea Transportation Partners L.P. of our report dated August 15, 2006relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears inthis Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPFlorham Park, New JerseySeptember 6, 2006

----
**Exhibit 99.10**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theannual report of Canadian Superior Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-Ffor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Craig McKenzie,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  March 30, 2008

 

 
|   | By:    |       /s/  CRAIG MCKENZIE |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Craig McKenzie                                          |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer                                 |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of YM BioSciences Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 40-F for the year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Len
Vernon, Director, Finance and Administration (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

      By:  /s/ Len Vernon
           ------------------------------------
           Len Vernon
           Director, Finance and Administration
           (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

November 12, 2004
#### BAKER v. STATE.

No. 24693.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 8, 1950.

E. A. Blair, Lubbock, Boling, Smith & Allen, S. P. Boling, Lubbock, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was charged with the offense of possession of whiskey, gin and beer in a dry area for the purpose of sale. The jury found him guilty and assessed his punishment at-a fine of One Hundred Dollars and thirty days in jail.

Officers searched two barns or outhouses located to the rear of a vacant house some 100 yards south of the Brownfield Highway in Lubbock County, stipulated to be a dry area.

There was a driveway leading from said highway passing the house and on by the barns or outhouses to another street, which driveway showed to have been used for travel by motor vehicles.

The officers testified that they searched the two outhouses and found in each a large quantity of whiskey, gin and beer, all of which was under lock. Some of the officers then barricaded the passage way at a point past the outhouses and laid in wait for some one to come to the liquor.

• Soon appellant drove up to the bam and, leaving his car in said driveway a few feet from one of the barns, walked toward such building.

He was immediately placed under arrest by the officers.

No liquor was found in the car or on the person of appellant, and the keys to the locks on the barns were not found as a result of the officers’ search therefor. Other keys were found on appellant’s person, and the officers tried them on the locks, but none would fit.

Two deeds were taken from the glove compartment of appellant’s car, but neither deed described the premises where the liquor was found.

This was the proof relied upon to show appellant’s possession of the liquor found.

In the absence of evidence in the record sufficient to show that appellant had some character of ownership, possession or control of the vacant house or barns, or of the liquor therein found, we sustain appellant’s contention that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction.

The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

### Public Announcement

Pursuant To The Government In the Sunshine Act (Public Law 94-409) [5 U.S.C. Section 522b].

*Agency Holding Meeting:*                     Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission.                

*Time and Date:*                     9:30 a.m., Tuesday, October 17, 2000.                

*Place:*                     5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.                

*Status:*                     Open.                

*Matters to be Considered:*                     The following matters have been placed on the agenda for the open Parole Commission meeting:                

1. Approval of minutes of previous Commission meeting.

2. Reports from the Chairman, Commissioners, Legal, Chief of Staff, Case Operations, and Administrative Sections.

3. Discussion of the proposed Interim Rules for District of Columbia Supervised Release.

*Agency Contact:*                     Sam Robertson, Case Operations, United States parole Commission, (301) 492-5962.                

Dated: October 10, 2000.

Michael A. Stover,

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-26564 Filed 10-12-00; 11:04 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
Exhibit 35.1

Annual Servicer Compliance Certificate

pursuant to

Section 3.9 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement

and

Item 1123 of
Regulation AB





USAA AUTO OWNER TRUST 2014-1





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of USAA Federal Savings Bank, as servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) under the Sale and
Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2014 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Sale and Servicing Agreement), by and among USAA Auto Owner Trust 2014-1, USAA Acceptance, LLC, the Servicer and U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout such period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this 30th day of
March, 2017.



/s/ Thomas CianelliName: Thomas CianelliTitle: Senior Vice President, Treasurer
Exhibit 99.9

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Paramount Energy Trust (the
Trust) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cameron R. Sebastian, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
of Paramount Energy Operating Corp., who performs the same function for the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Cameron R. Sebastian                                                               
|Cameron R. Sebastian                                                                   
|Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Paramount Energy Operating Corp.

March 9, 2010
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Michael T. DuBose, certify that:

1.        I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Vertis, Inc.;

2.        Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.        Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.        The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:



5.        The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



| |  | /s/MICHAEL T. DUBOSEName: Michael T. DuBoseTitle: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 3, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit ‘O’

Subject to Protective Order. Provided to Court for in camera review pursuant to 

Order. 

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 112-15 Filed 10/27/22 Page 1 of 1
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO

______________________________________

MELODY JOY CANTU AND DR. RODRIGO 

CANTU,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DR. SANDRA GUERRA and DIGITAL 

FORENSICS CORPORATION, LLC,

Defendants.

5:20-CV-0746 JKP – HJB

______________________________________

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

DEFENDANT DR. SANDRA GUERRA’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS

On this date came on to be considered Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Defendant Dr. 

Sandra Guerra’s Amended Counterclaims (Doc. No. 38) (the “Motion”). Upon due consideration 

of the Motion and Reply in Support thereto (Doc. No. 40), the Court finds that the Motion should 

be GRANTED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Defendant Dr. 

Sandra Guerra’s Amended Counterclaims is GRANTED in all respects. 

It is so ORDERED.

Dated: _________________ _____________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 41-1 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          43,237
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  301,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,053
<INVENTORY>                                    283,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               637,551
<PP&E>                                       1,117,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                 659,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,587,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          298,391
<BONDS>                                        500,032
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        797
<COMMON>                                        11,002
<OTHER-SE>                                     650,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,587,868
<SALES>                                        840,446
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               840,446
<CGS>                                          673,368
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  673,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (7,357)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,230
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,983
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,289
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,889
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,889
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.53


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Governors of the Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center.

The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

*Name of Committee:*                         Board of Governors of the Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center Executive Committee.                    

*Date:*                         November 17, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center Medical Board Room, 2C115, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maureen E. Gormley, Executive Secretary, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 2C146, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/496-2897.                    

Dated: October 12, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-26866  Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### McDONALD v. CALHOUN et al.

No. A-2758.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 21, 1950.

C. C. Small and Dan Moody, Austin, for relator.

George Sergeant, Dallas, Creekmore Fath, Austin, Gilbert T. Adams, Beaumont, Woodville J. Rogers, San Antonio, J. E. Wheat, Woodville, R. E. Schneider, Jr., George -West, and J. H. Sullivan, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This is an original petition for mandamus by which relator, Ji E. McDonald, seeks to compel respondents, John C. Calhoun et al. as officers arid members of the State Executive Committee of the Democratic Party of Texas and as chairmen of the several county executive committees of that party, to certify his name as a candidate for the Democratic nomination for the office of Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Texas in the coming Democratic primary and to print his name on the ballot in all the counties in this State as such candidate. Although relator in due form tendered his application for a place on the ballot as such candidate and paid his fee, the State Committee refused to certify his name as a candidate on the ground that he was not acting in good faith in his offer to take the party pledge to support the nominees of the 1950 primary because he had supported the Republican national ticket in 1940, 1944, and 1948, had voted for the Republican candidate for U. S. Senator in 1948, had, in April, 1950, “visited-the Panhandle of Texas and there conferred with and gave aid and comfort to the Republican candidate for Congress”, and had testified before the Committee on June 12, 1950, when asked, “Mr. McDonald if Mr. Truman is nominated for President of the United States in the 1952 election will you support him” that “I don’t know.”

All the issues thus raised are foreclosed by the decision of this Court in Love v. Wilcox, 119 Tex. 256, 28 S.W.2d 515, 70 A.L.R. 1484, rendered in 1930. That case construed Art. 3107, Vernon’s Ann.Civ. *657Stat., directly contrary to the contentions of respondents. Although the Legislature has since been, in biennial general session ten times, that construction has not been altered by any amendment of Art. 3107. It follows, therefore, that Love v. Wilcox announces the settled law of this State, and the writ of mandamus will issue in all things as prayed by relator.

Because of the fact that but few days remain for the ballots to be printed for the July primary, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and none may be filed. Rule 515, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.