alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2854 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2854

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
           deduction of State and local general sales taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2013

 Mr. Hastings of Washington (for himself, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mrs. 
    Blackburn, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Conaway, Ms. DelBene, Mr. Duncan of 
Tennessee, Mr. Fincher, Ms. Granger, Mr. Hall, Mr. Heck of Washington, 
Mr. Heck of Nevada, Mr. Hinojosa, Ms. Herrera Beutler, Mr. Kilmer, Mrs. 
Lummis, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Nugent, Mr. Radel, and Mr. Roe of Tennessee) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
           deduction of State and local general sales taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION OF STATE AND LOCAL GENERAL 
              SALES TAXES.

    Subparagraph (I) of section 164(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``, and before January 1, 2014''.
                                 <all>
```
Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the amended Annual Report of Nevada Geothermal Power, Inc., a company organized under the British Columbia Company Act (the Company), on Form 20-F/A as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Don J. A. Smith, Secretary/CFO of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Don J. A. Smith

Secretary/CFO





Date: April 20, 2006
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gerald
McIlhargey, Chief Executive Officer of St. Joseph, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of St. Joseph, Inc.





By
                /s/GERALD MCILHARGEYName:  Gerald
      McIlhargeyTitle:  Chief
      Executive Officer and PresidentDate:  March
      31, 2009
DRAFT (Revised 3-9-05) 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 03-0865 EER: Hall\JB 

PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Yes Label: No 

General Eqpt: 

nd 

Respirator: 

Health Effects:

n 

TLV/PEL 

CRSS (10/14/2003): 

Chemical Name: 

S-H20: 

VP: 

MW: 

Phys State

Consumer Use: 

SAT (10/15/2003): 

Related cases: 

Migration to groundwater: Negligible 

PBT rating: P1B1T1 

Health: 1-2 (Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 2 (all releases to water) 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 7EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 7
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 2 

PMN: 03-865 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: T STEER 

(07/24/03 version). 

POLLU

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 7EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 7
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 3 

PMN: 03-865 

MFG: 

Site/Location: 

Days/yr: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

 

rom: 

basis: 

Note: 

:

basis: 

 

 
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 4 

PMN: 03-865 

MFG: continued 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES E

Tot. # of workers:

Days/yr: 

INHALATION: 

DERMAL: 

basis: s 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 7EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 7
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 5 

PMN: 03-865 

USE: 

Sites/Location:

Days/yr: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

from:

basis: 

Note: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 7EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 7
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 6 

PMN: 03-865 

USE: continued 

ENVIR TAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY: continued 

from: 

basis: 

 

: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 7EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 7
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 7 

PMN: 03-865 

USE: continued 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Tot. # of workers: 

Days/yr: 

INHALATION: 

DERMAL: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 7EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 7
| Date   | May      6, 2010 |   | /S/      Douglas A. Starrett                              |
|--------|------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |             |   | Douglas      A. StarrettChief      Executive Officer      |
|   |             |   |                                                      |
| Date   | May      6, 2010 |   | /S/      Francis J. O’Brien                         |
|   |             |   | Francis      J. O’BrienChief      Financial Officer |

----
EXHIBIT 3

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 61-3 Filed 10/20/21 Page 1 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 61-3 Filed 10/20/21 Page 2 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 61-3 Filed 10/20/21 Page 3 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 61-3 Filed 10/20/21 Page 4 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 61-3 Filed 10/20/21 Page 5 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 61-3 Filed 10/20/21 Page 6 of 6
Essential Air Service At Thief River Falls MN

OST-2001-10642 January 28, 2014 At the request of the Thief River Falls Regional Airport, TransportAzumah has prepared adraft schedule and cost for an emergency interim busservice between Thief River Fallsand Grand Forks International Airport. We will designate this option to be "Thief River FallsOption 2". The following markets would receive emergency interim bus service beginning on orjust after February 1: TransportAzumah Emergency Interim BusService Market Hub Round Trips PerDay 3Month Subsidy Thief River FalisMN GFK S $209,920 Sample bus schedules are provided below. They are subject to change: 

### Thief River Falls MN - GFK Thief River Falls MN 

### >Grand Forks ND (Daily) Thief River FallsMN 

## I 545a 

## I 945a 245p 630p 1015p Grand Forks ND 

## I 700a 1l00a 400p 745p 1130p

Grand Forks ND

### >Thief River Falls MN (Daily) Grand Forks ND 700a lOOp 500p 745p 1130p Thief River FallsMN 815a 215p 615p 900p 1245a In light of the short timeframe available to avoid uninterrupted service, we request expedited consideration of our request. Dueto the length of this contract, we will also need modified payment arrangements. Please contact usassoon aspossible sothat we can start on orjust after February 1, 2014.

Contact: Joel Anabilah-Azumah, jazumah@transportazumah.com. 347-927-0750



## •
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 3, 2017

NO. 03-17-00046-CV

Matthew Bialaszewski, Appellant

v.

Amanda Bialaszewski, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND GOODWIN

REVERSED AND RENDERED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order granting appellee’s petition for bill of review,

signed on November 10, 2016. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the 

Court holds that there was reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial 

court’s order and arrearage finding and renders judgment denying appellee’s petition for bill of 

review. The order challenged by appellee remains in full force and effect. Appellee shall pay all 

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5262 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5262

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bis(4-tbutylcyclohexyl) 
                           peroxydicarbonate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Olson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bis(4-tbutylcyclohexyl) 
                           peroxydicarbonate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BIS(4-TBUTYLCYCLOHEXYL) PEROXYDICARBONATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.59 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Bis(4-tbutylcyclohexyl) 
peroxydicarbonate) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc | Suite 501, 55 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5J 2H7T(416) 947-0907 F(416) 947-0395 www.scottwilson.com | [exhibit23002.gif]
|----------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------



CONSENT OF EXPERT

United States

Securities and Exchange Commission100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549-7010



Autoritédesmarchés financiersDirection des Marche des Capiteaux 800, Square Victoria, 22e etage Tour de la Bourse,C.P. 246

Montreal (Quebec) H4Z 1G3

Alberta Securities Commission4thFloor, 300  5thAvenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 3C4



Ontario Securities Commission20 Queen Street West, Suite 1903 Toronto, Ontario M5H3S8



British Columbia Securities CommissionP.O. Box 10142, Pacific Centre

701 West Georgia Street

Vancouver, British Columbia V7Y 1L2



Re: Strateco Resources Inc.



I, R. Barry Cook, M.Sc., P.Eng., of Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc., as an author of reports entitled



·

Technical Report on the Mineral Resource Update for the Matoush Uranium Project, Central Quebec, Canada,NI 43-101 Technical Report dated September 16, 2008.



·

Technical Report on the Apple Project, James Bay Area, NorthwesternQuébec,Canada, NI 43-101 Technical Report dated June 2, 2008.



·

Technical Report on the Preliminary Assessment of the Matoush Project, CentralQuébec,Canada NI 43-101 Technical Report dated December 17, 2008.



(the Reports).I do hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the Reports and the summary of, or the extracts from, the Reports in Form 10K being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, .and Form 10K being filed as Annual Information Form and Management Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Autorité des marchés financiersand the Alberta, Ontario and British Columbia Securities Commission on March 16, 2009.



I also confirm that I have read the written disclosure being filed and that it fairly and accurately represents the information in the Reports that supports the above-named disclosure



Dated this 16th day of March 2009



(Signed) R. Barry Cook



R. Barry Cook, M.Sc., P.Eng. Associate Consulting Geologist



Email: barry.cook@scottwilson.com
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A142
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Stephan Kuppenheimer, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch
Depositor, Inc., on behalf of PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of
New York and its officers and agents.

Date: March 27, 2006
                                                  /s/ Stephan Kuppenheimer
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  President
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 12

- 15297 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:10

- cr - 00048

- SDM

- TGW

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus WILLIE C. TONEY, a.k.a. Anthony Toney, a.k.a. Tony, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United Stat es District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (August 12, 2013) Before HULL , MARCUS and KRAVITCH , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 12-15297 Date Filed: 08/12/2013 Page: 1 of 32 Willie Toney appeals his 262

- month sentence for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S .C. §§ 922(g) and 924(e), arguing it i s substantively unreasonable in light of the record and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). After careful review, we affirm. We review the substantive reasonableness of a sentence for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Irey , 612 F.3d 1160, 1188

- 89 (11th Cir. 2010) ( en banc ). “The party challenging the sentence bears the burden to show it is unreasonable in light of the record and the § 3553(a) factors.” United States v.
Tome , 611 F.3d 1371, 1378 (11th Cir. 2010). Toney has not met his burden of demonstrating that his sentence was unreasonable. H is sentence was within his guidelines range and we ordinarily expect a guidelines sentence to be reasonable. See United States v. Talley , 431 F.3d 784, 788 (11th Cir. 2005). T he court considered the statutory factors and discussed several of them in detail , including : the nature and circumstances of Toney’s offense (threatening his girlfriend, punching her pregnant daughter in the face, pointing a knife at his girlfriend’s niece, and firing two gunshots in front of his girlfriend’s residence); Toney’s history and characteristics, including his prior convictio ns for several violent offenses; and the need for a lengthy sentence to promote r espect for the law, deter Toney’ s criminal conduct , and p rotect the public. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Although Toney contends that his advanced age

Case: 12-15297 Date Filed: 08/12/2013 Page: 2 of 33 and history of mental health issues warranted a below

- guidelines sentence, the district court considered these arguments and concluded the countervailing considerations required a longer term of imprisonment . We cannot say this determination was an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Amedeo , 487 F.3d 823, 832 (11th Cir. 2007) (“The weight to be accord ed any given § 3553(a) factor is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the district court, and we will not substitute our judgment in weighing the relevant factors.” (alteration s and internal quotation marks omitted)). AFFIRMED. Case: 12-15297 Date Filed: 08/12/2013 Page: 3 of 3
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 20

- 11745 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:19

- cr - 00316

- VMC

- CPT

- 3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus
DECIO VIVEROS GRANJA, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ ( May 20, 2021 ) Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIA M:

USCA11 Case: 20-11745 Date Filed: 05/20/2021 Page: 1 of 32 Decio Viveros Granja appeals from his conviction for conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine while on board of a vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, in violation of 46 U.S.C. §§ 70503(a), 70506(a) and (b), and 21 U.S.C. § 960(b)(1)(B)(ii) , and sentence of 121 months’ imprisonment

. Granja’s appointed counsel in this direct criminal appeal has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967) (when counsel determines that a criminal defendant’s case is “wholly frivolous,” counsel must “so advise the court and request permission to withdraw”). As required, his counsel filed a brief sett ing out any irregularities or other potential errors in Granja’s plea and sentencing processes that might arguably be meritorious. See United States v. Blackwell , 767 F.2d 1486, 1487

– 88 (11th Cir. 1985) (per curiam). His counsel notes the existence of a valid appeal waiver in the plea agreement and says the record does not reveal that any exception to that waiver applies . He also
notes that Granja received a below

- guidelines sentence. He concludes that he was unable to find the existence of any meritori ous argument on appeal. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

USCA11 Case: 20-11745 Date Filed: 05/20/2021 Page: 2 of 33 motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Granja’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

USCA11 Case: 20-11745 Date Filed: 05/20/2021 Page: 3 of 3
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Anna A. Wexler et al., as Executors of Adolf Wexler, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

January 15, 1951.

*Harry I. Stein*and *Louis Engelberg*for executors.

*George Bosling,*special guardian for infant parties.

*Bachrach, Bachrach <& Bisgyer*for Jewish Sanitarium and Hospital for Chronic Diseases.

*Nathaniel E. Wheeler*for Royal Indemnity Co., as surety.

*Gcmson J. Baldwin*for New England Mutual Life Ins. Co.

*Houghton Bell*for Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York.

*736*Sidney F. Strongin*for Brooklyn Hebrew Home & Hospital for the Aged.

*Galli S Locker*for Travelers Insurance Co.

E. Ivan Bubenstein, S.

The compensation requested by the attorneys for the executors appears to be reasonable and is allowed in such amount. Such compensation is inclusive of all legal services heretofore rendered, and to be rendered in the entry of a decree judicially settling the account of said executors and in the supervision of the distribution to be made thereunder. The amount heretofore paid to them on account is to be credited against such total compensation. The compensation requested by the coexecutor, who as a certified public accountant, rendered services in connection with certain questions of tax liability affecting the decedent individually, and certain corporations of which he was a major stockholder, appears to be reasonable, and is allowed in such amount. He was the accountant for the decedent in his lifetime; was familiar with his affairs; and was described in the will as ‘ ‘ my good friend and accountant.” Under these circumstances the court deems it proper for the remaining executors to have retained him to appear before the Federal tax authorities, and to perform the particular services, which were not those ordinarily required to be performed by an executor. The manner of computation of the prorata shares of the Federal and New York State estate taxes allocable to the proceeds of the several policies of life insurance appears to be correct and is adopted by the court. The insurance carriers are directed to pay to the executors the prorata share of the taxes so allocated to each policy, and the beneficiaries thereof are directed to surrender their certificates of interest to the respective insurance carriers for appropriate indorsement, or in exchange for new certificates, which will, in either case, reflect the payment of the respective tax contributions and evidence the recomputed amounts due thereunder. Submit decree, on notice, accordingly.