alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Allan Block, hereby certify that the annual report on Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.


                                                    /s/  Allan  Block
                                                    ---------------------
                                                      Allan  Block
                                                    Managing Director
                                                     March 27, 2003


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 905 has
been provided to Block Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Block
Communications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissions or
its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               5
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         79
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1426
<PP&E>                                             539
<DEPRECIATION>                                     145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              191
<BONDS>                                              2
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         15
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                        1570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1833
<SALES>                                           1377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1377
<CGS>                                              647
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    350
<INCOME-TAX>                                       135
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                215
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       215
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
· · ·. OUT · · HT . . 

·-

20~fS' .. 'AIRCRAFT i AIRCRAFT· . R . E OF FUG .· DUAAnoN. :CAT

MAK! I · ··· ....... ·· · ·· · --~ ............. ,................ . ·· . . 

- DATI MODEL IDENT · FROM l TO OF FUGHT Af:R

tjr D~ ·. ivi~\Cl"'t U!Of~ ~ct · . • • , · · · .

.. ::> : ;.(., ,. , . ""'(,.. .. . "\ ' . . 

.. --~ .... -.... ~.·-~····~· .. ·.··~J·.:...· .. - ·'--~·!·· .... ~; ...... _,. .... +·-.... 4:.. ..... ................. " ._ ................. _,_ .. , ... ~t---~ ........ --.. ~·-~----... ·--·.·~·"·~------~·-,~--,... .. ~··---., 

.. l

1i 

::~( 

1'-"~~a..t 

E\.~ 

~vt> ·. \ L 1; . · 

i . . 

. I 

ft=J : , t . Y'fi-Y 

..... , .. _ ... , ................. ~ ................ , -... ,,,.,,_.~ ........ , ....... , . ., ........... --~-. 'ti!J~-· ·.q-~ ~· .. ·e:: ·-----~ -~·-·- .-~----~--..,.._., .... ~. ···---~-··

! \f'\ it)~\ ;V~~t.lw.'l + 

0 r A~, . 4 ' · 

1 . . : •vvt· i 

)/fo jt:>~ \ \v~~d-.t · ~~ \~t\ 

'•""~ ....... ~,·-·. _,,_ •-'"•l:."N"·'" .. ..-'.'>'• ·.•,• ·-·"" _._.,,,_ .. ,,_,.,l,',_,_,._,,._,, •..•. ,,V~~ .. ---.- _.,.,,,,._ ··-~--~~~- - < . , ...

., 'D•\ IVL.'- "\t- t,;;..... ' 

-, tL.. 1 · u\ t ~~,~-"{ ..-~ 

J 1 : · .11'\. u~ 

! \ ~ ' 

\li,;- T\5\~f-·--Tv-;si~+ c:o ~. c · -

1 ~ ; w~ ' 

. 

\/'···5·~-·····"-·"~'T"t) .. \ .. ,-.......... ~·-,u-\St&\it- ~-~~"'~\c.. o~L<'(·~ ---·

, .._) r ~ 

i .; 

I 

i 

··~-------

I ' 

..... ,... ........ .........,....._ .. ,_.~~ ...... ~.OJ''<' .... •t'Jo' .. ,..,..:'\ ........... --l-...... .A.~" ... ~ ...... ~~·-·-....._ ......... _..., .. -.~ I ) 

.t l 

i l 

..,~~··-~·-·--~t·"'·'·---....... 

·-:--···-··"'·-----··t--·~--·-··---~-·----~-~ 

I I 

THlS RECORD IS CERTIFIED 

TRUE AND CORRECT 

-

...... -·~-~·-., •. ....,.. ... -_. • ..w,._ ..... _ ................. :... ....... ., .. ..,.. .... _____ ._ .. ._,_. ... _, ....... .... --- ~~-~-

-

...... - -~ t 

' 

• 

~-·...-•----- tt ,... 

t 

. • 

---~--- ........u-~ .....1..- 

1 

PAGE TOTALS t 

I 

I t. l 

.... -.---... .. ~--- ....... ,..,._~'lo."--...-....,_.,.. .... ~~--_,.._-............. .....,..~~ -· .. "'* II!'!+ 

PREVIOUS TOTALS ·f I ' 

~··-·-~-~~----~----.;.~ .. ~- ··--~~~ ... ----U...-.-.-...__.f .... II . . . ·-

la.lf!"Ull ... ..._ ... a I A •
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                                                                    PO Box 84013
                                                          Columbus GA 31908-4013
                                                              Tel.  800.784.5566

                                                      [GREENPOINT MORTGAGE LOGO]

TO : RWT HOLDINGS, INC.

      Re : Annual Statement as to Compliance by the Seller

      Pursuant to Section 6.04 of the Mortgage Loan Flow Purchase, Sale, and
Servicing Agreement between GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. as Seller (the
"Seller") and RWT Holdings, Inc. as Purchaser, dated as of August 1, 2002 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned officer of the Seller, hereby certifies as to the
following:

            (i) a review of the activities of the Seller during the calendar
      year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Applicable Period") and of the Seller's
      performance under the Agreement has been made under the direct supervision
      of the undersigned officer; and

            (ii) to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such
      review, the Seller has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      Agreement throughout the Applicable Period, and there has been no known
      default in the fulfillment of the Seller's obligations throughout such
      Applicable Period.

                                          Very Truly Yours

                                          GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.
                                          as Seller

                                          /s/ Roy Briggs
                                          ----------------------
                                          Name: Roy Briggs
                                          Title: Vice President

                AVISO IMPORTANTE PARA LAS PERSONAS HABLA ESPANOL
               Si usted no endendo el contenido do esta carta por
                   favor obtonga uno troduccion immediamente

                  2300 BROOKSTONE CENTRE PKWY COLUMBUS GA 31904
       CUSTOMER SERVICE HOURS: MONDAY - FRIDAY, 8:30 AM - 8:00 PM, EASTERN
                            www.greenpointservice.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000095254
<NAME> CASPEN OIL INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         124,570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  151,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               275,654
<PP&E>                                      20,023,132
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,295,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,813,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,204,829
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          600,000
<PREFERRED>                                    425,000
<COMMON>                                       210,922
<OTHER-SE>                                   (627,549)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,813,202
<SALES>                                        139,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,381
<CGS>                                           35,979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  242,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               269,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (383,306)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### ABERCROMBIE V. STATE,

No. 26835.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 17, 1953.

C. L. Harris, Lubbock, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for two sales of whisky in a dry area, as alleged in separate counts of the information; the punishment, six months in jail and a fine of $500.

Appellant testified and denied that he made any sale of whisky to the two agents of the Texas- Liquor Control Board, and denied that he was present at the time the agents testified they had bought whisky from him at his home. He claimed an alibi and offered evidence in support thereof.

Bill of Exception No. 2 relates to the cross-examination of appellant wherein he was required to testify that he was convicted of burglary and given a 2-year suspended sentence.

. Appellant was 33 years of age at the time of the trial. The two year suspended sentence for burglary occurred some 13 years before the present trial, at which time he was 20 years of age, and there is no showing that appellant had since been convicted of a felony or of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude.

The court and counsel for the state were apprised of the remoteness of the conviction by objection made in the absence of the jury. The objection should have been sustained. See Branch’s Ann.P.C., p. 101, Sec. 167; 45 Tex.Jur., p. 111, Sec. 250.

The testimony was of a prejudicial nature and its admission shows an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court and calls for reversal of the conviction.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Exhibit 31.2

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S.
Bank Trust National Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Motorola Debenture-Backed Series 2002-14 Trust (the Trust), certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed by
Lehman ABS Corporation in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report of the Trust;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or
similar agreement for inclusion in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my knowledge, except as
disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    |  | 
|----------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2011               
|                                   
|/s/ David J. Kolibachuk            
|David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
#### WILLIAMSON v. STATE.

No. 22659.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 8, 1943.

G. Q. Youngblood, of Dallas, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

A penalty of three years was assessed on a charge of burglary.

The proceeding is regular and we find no bills of exception or statement of fact in the record. There is nothing for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

of

Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Lynn L. Elsenhans, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Sunoco, Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sunoco, Inc.



|                  |  |  |  |                                                
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Lynn L. Elsenhans                          
|                  |  |  |  | Lynn L. Elsenhans                              
|                  |  |  |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
EXHIBIT 3

Case 6:20-cv-00478-ADA Document 88-3 Filed 03/17/21 Page 1 of 2
AGREED CONSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ’921 PATENT

Claim Term Agreed Construction 

“computing means for control of the nodes” 

(Claim 1)

“computing means for controlling the node” 

(Claims 9 & 17)

Subject to means-plus-function construction. 

Function: control of the nodes

Structure: CPU 206; and equivalent 

structures

“means for fast propagation of node related 

information between the data plane means in 

each node and forwarding the information to 

the computing means in the network” (Claim 

1) 

“means for fast propagation of node related 

information to and from the data plane means 

in other nodes in the network and forwarding 

the information to the computing means” 

(Claims 9 & 17)

Subject to means-plus-function construction. 

Function: fast propagation of node related 

information between the data plane means in 

each node and forwarding the information to 

the computing means in the network 

Structure: 3:19-52 (switching fabric 214 and 

link interface 216; wherein the link interface 

comprises a fast link state processor (FSLP) 

218 and a link failure database (LFDB) 

structure 228), 4:1-4, 7:18-20 (forwarding to 

CPU over link 236); and equivalent structures

“means for fast propagation of link state 

information”

(Claims 1, 9 & 17)

Subject to means-plus-function construction.

Function: fast propagation of link state 

information

Structure: 7:60-8:3 (Fast Link State 

Processor (FLSP) 218, Fabric Interface 226 

and Switch Fabric 214 structure), 8:21-27; 

and equivalent structures

“the data, plane means” (Claim 9) “the data plane means”

Case 6:20-cv-00478-ADA Document 88-3 Filed 03/17/21 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles A. Hinrichs, SeniorVice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Charles A.  Hinrichs                           |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Charles A.  Hinrichs                               |
| Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
| November 7,  2005                             |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc.and will be retained by Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM TECH-SYM CORPORATION FORM 10-Q FIRST QUARTER 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          30,846
<SECURITIES>                                     1,818
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                       336
<INVENTORY>                                     20,069
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,280
<PP&E>                                          85,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,662
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,497
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           815
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,989
<SALES>                                         42,593
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,593
<CGS>                                           30,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,293
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,409)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  67
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,642
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,917
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,725
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,725
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81


</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 10424 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
KENDRICK CHAPPLE , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12

- CR

- 273

- 2

Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Kendrick Chapple has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Chapple has filed a response requesting an extension of tim e to respond to various orders to show cause issued by th is court , and to investigate his counsel’s performance

.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 17, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-10424 Document: 00512665913 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2014No. 13

- 10424

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Chapple ’s response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Chapple ’s claim of ine ffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice t o collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). Chapple’s motion for an extension of time is DENIED as unnecessary because counsel has adequately satisfied each order to show

cause. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review because the defendant validly agreed to waive appeal . Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2.

2 Case: 13-10424 Document: 00512665913 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2014