alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61381-61382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26662]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0459]


Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 
(44 U.S.C., 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Veterans 
Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs, has 
submitted the collection of information abstracted below to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA 
submission describes the nature of the information collection and its 
expected cost and burden; it includes the actual data collection 
instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 16, 2000.
    For Further Information or a Copy of the Submission Contact: Denise 
McLamb, Information Management Service (045A4), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8030 
or FAX (202) 273-5981. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0459.''

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Property Management Consolidated Invoice, VA Form 26-8974.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0459.
    Type of Review: Reinstatement, with change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Abstract: The Consolidated Property Management Invoice is computer-
generated by VA and sent to management brokers monthly to obtain 
management brokers' bills for reimbursement of expenses and payment of 
fees associated with management of VA-acquired properties.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published on November 29, 1999, at page 66696.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 44,000 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 10 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Monthly.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,080.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 22,000.
    Send comments and recommendations concerning any aspect of the 
information collection to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Allison Eydt, OMB 
Human Resources and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 
12035, Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-4650. Please refer to ``OMB 
Control No. 2900-0459'' in any correspondence.

    Dated: September 20, 2000.


[[Page 61382-61742]]


    By direction of the Acting Secretary.
Donald L. Neilson,
Director, Information Management Service.
[FR Doc. 00-26662 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

The undersigned officer of The Stride Rite Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended May 28, 2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose
whatsoever.



Date:       July 8, 2004            Name:       /s/ Frank A. Caruso
      ------------------------            ------------------------------------
                                    Title:      Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26371]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on August 4, 2000, Irix 
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 101 Technology Place, Florence, South Carolina 
29501, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of 
methylphenidate (1724), a basic class of controlled substance listed in 
Schedule II.
    The firm plans to manufacture methylphenidate for demonstration 
purposes and for dosage form development and stability studies.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than December 12, 2000.

    Dated: September 28, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-26371 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Exhibit
13.1





CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Lingo Media Corporation (the
“Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and





2.
            The
      information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Registrant.




Date:
July 18, 2008




/s/
      Michael KraftMichael
      Kraft
                President & Chief Executive
      Officer




This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of
this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




This
certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 99.7




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of YM BioSciences Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leonard Vernon, Vice President, Finance and Administration of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Leonard VernonLeonard VernonVice President, Finance and Administration





September 22, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, James M. Papada, III, Chief Executive Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 27,
      2003 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2)   information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Technitrol, Inc.

Dated: July 30, 2003


                                               /s/ James M. Papada, III
                                               ------------------------
                                               James M. Papada, III

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be retained by Technitrol, Inc., and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered as filed
as part of the Form 10-Q.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC,

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD, and 6:20-cv-00507-ADA

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Neonode Smartphone LLC

6/22/23

SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.

1301 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10019

(212) 336-8340

William Jeffrey Melsheimer (24126417)

jmelsheimer@susmangodfrey.com

(212) 729-2060

/s/ William Jeffrey Melsheimer

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 85 Filed 06/22/23 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Edward M. Carriero, Jr., Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunair Services Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 14, 2008                                                                  /s/  Edward M. Carriero, Jr.   Edward M. Carriero, Jr.   *Interim Chief Financial Officer*
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION





I, Robert Y. Newell, certify that;



1.     I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Cardica, Inc.; and



2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                       | /s/ Robert Y. Newell                                                                                         
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 28, 2014 |                                                                                                              
|                       | Robert Y. Newell
Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### UNITED COUNTY MUT. FIRE INS. CO. v. TALLEY.

No. 2868.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

May 26, 1951.

*467John Touchstone, George C. Cochran, Dallas, for appellant.

Ely Straus, Dallas, for appellee.

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 414 provides that an appellant shall file briefs in the Court of Civil Appeals within 30 days after the filing therein of the transcript and statement of facts. The transcript and statement of facts were filed in the Court of Civil Appeals on September 6, 1950. R.C.P. 415 provides that when an appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless good cause is shown for such failure and that appellee has not suffered material injury thereby.

Appellant has not filed briefs, nor has it offered any excuse for such failure. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Thrasher, Tex.Civ. App., 190 S.W.2d 596; Willacy County Water Control and Imp. Dist. No. 1 v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 101 S.W.2d 373; Dixieland Petroleum Corporation v. Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 216 S.W.2d 235.

The appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunair Services Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on August 14, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Synnott B. Durham, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.         /s/ Synnott B. Durham   Synnott B. Durham   Chief Financial Officer   August 14, 2006
#### In the Matter of Hank Ross, Petitioner, v Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, Respondent.

Mahoney, P. J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to Education Law § 6510-a [4]) to review a determination of respondent which, *inter alia,*found petitioner guilty of professional misconduct in the practice of medicine.

Petitioner is a physician licensed to practice in this State. He was charged with a single specification of professional misconduct alleging that he prepared the wrong leg of a patient on which an operation was performed. Petitioner acknowledged that he knew the left leg was to be operated on and prepped the right leg. The sole issue presented is whether this conduct constitutes gross negligence as required for a finding of professional misconduct. The Hearing Committee recommended that petitioner’s actions did not rise to the level of gross negligence. The Commissioner of Health, however, recommended a finding of gross negligence with censure and reprimand. The Regents Review Committee unanimously recommended a finding of gross negligence but, by a split vote, *570recommended that petitioner receive a one-year stayed suspension with probation. The Board of Regents found petitioner guilty of gross negligence and ordered his censure and reprimand. After respondent entered an appropriate order, this proceeding ensued.

In *Matter of Spero v Board of Regents*(158 AD2d 763), we held that the Board’s conclusion that the physician who supervised the operation at issue herein had committed gross negligence was rationally based. Likewise here, we cannot say that the Board, which is charged with determining what constitutes gross negligence *(see, supra,*at 764), acted irrationally in finding that petitioner’s conduct in propping the wrong leg constituted gross negligence. Despite his acknowledged familiarity with the patient’s condition, petitioner prepped the wrong leg without alerting any of the other physicians involved. Such conduct certainly can be characterized as “egregious” as required for gross negligence under Education Law § 6509 (2) *(see, Matter of Yong-Myun Rho v Ambach,*74 NY2d 318, 322). We also find the censure and reprimand imposed not to be disproportionate to the misconduct.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

DIANE REED BRIGHT, INDIVIDUALLY, 

AND AS THE PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF 

DECEDENT, JAMES SCOTT REED;

 Plaintiff

-vsCITY OF KILLEEN, ANTHONY R 

CUSTANCE, RICHARD A HATFIELD, JR., 

FRED L BASKETT, CHRISTIAN SUESS,

 Defendants

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

W-20-CV-00431-ADA

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 

Jeffrey C. Manske. ECF No. 50. The Report recommends that this Court deny in part Officers 

Basket, Hatfield, and Suess’s Motion to Dismiss all claims against them with respect to the Fourth 

Amendment excessive force claim and invocation of qualified immunity but grant in part as to the 

§ 1983 and § 1985 conspiracy claims. The Report and Recommendation was filed on May 11, 

2021.

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations 

of the magistrate judge within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report and 

recommendation, thereby securing de novo review by the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 72(b). A district court need not consider “[f]rivolous, conclusive, or general objections.” 

Battle v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 834 F.2d 419, 421 (5th Cir. 1987) (quoting Nettles v. Wainwright, 

677 F.2d 404, 410 n.8 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc), overruled on other grounds by Douglass v. United 

States Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996)). 

Case 6:20-cv-00431-ADA-JCM Document 56 Filed 09/27/21 Page 1 of 2
Defendants timely filed objections on May 17, 2021 and May 27, 2021. ECF No. 51, 54, 

55. Plaintiff similarly filed timely objections and a response in opposition to Defendants’

objections on May 20, 2021. ECF No. 52, 53. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the 

motion to dismiss, the responses, the report and recommendation, the objections to the report and 

recommendation, and the applicable laws. After that thorough review, the Court is persuaded that 

the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendation should be adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States 

Magistrate Judge Manske, ECF No. 50, is ADOPTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Christian Suess is DISMISSED from the 

case as all claims against Officer Suess are dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s remaining objections are OVERRULED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22) is

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART in accordance with the Report and 

Recommendation. 

SIGNED this 27th day of September, 2021.

Case 6:20-cv-00431-ADA-JCM Document 56 Filed 09/27/21 Page 2 of 2