alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Louis J. Cappelli, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 of Sterling Bancorp (the "Company");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

                                     Date: 8/9/04


                                     /s/ Louis J. Cappelli
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Louis J. Cappelli
                                     Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                                       87
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50589

Conference Calendar

 

EARL S. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CV-677

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Earl S. Williams appeals from the district court’s judgment

affirming the denial of his application for disability insurance

benefits. He argues that substantial evidence did not support

the Commissioner’s decision that he was not disabled. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

the judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated by

the magistrate judge and adopted by the district court. Williams

v. Commissioner, No. A-95-CA-677 JN (W.D. Tex. July 9, 1996).
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         095676
<NAME>                        Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         AUG-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                          APR-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                             1.000
<CASH>                                                        445
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               7,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 (570)
<INVENTORY>                                                10,204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           20,374
<PP&E>                                                     22,673
<DEPRECIATION>                                             (6,989)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             46,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      13,968
<BONDS>                                                    17,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                      299
<OTHER-SE>                                                 12,685
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               46,551
<SALES>                                                    37,889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           37,889
<CGS>                                                      22,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              22,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           10,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          2,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             1,927
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  675
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         1,252
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 1252
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0.39


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11

                STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       QUARTER ENDED
                                             --------------------------------
                                                March 26,            March 27,
                                                  1999                  1998
                                             --------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>                     <C>
BASIC  (A)
Earnings:
    Net income                                 $  5,813              $ 40,570
                                                =======               =======


Shares:
    Weighted average shares outstanding          99,804               106,627
                                                =======               =======


Earnings per share:
    Basic earnings per share                   $   0.06              $   0.38
                                                =======               =======



DILUTED  (A)
Earnings:
    Net income                                 $  5,813              $ 40,570
                                                =======               =======


Shares:
    Weighted average shares outstanding          99,804               106,627
    Dilutive effect of outstanding options
      (as determined under the treasury
      stock method)                               2,178                 2,634
                                                -------               -------
    Weighted-average and dilutive
      potential shares                          101,982               109,261
                                                =======               =======


Earnings per share:
    Diluted earnings per share                 $   0.06              $   0.37
                                                =======               =======



(A)  Earnings per common share has been  restated to reflect the effect of the 
     2-for-1 stock split in the form of a stock dividend on June 26, 1998.


</TABLE>
Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P. 

Attorneys and Counselors 

2273794v1 

10939.002 

Andrew L. Johnson 

Direct Dial: (713) 403-8205 

ajohnson@thompsoncoe.com 

Austin 

Dallas 

Houston 

Los Angeles 

Saint Paul 

September 4, 2015

Via Efile 

Clerk of Court 

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

301 Fannin Street 

Houston, Texas 77002-2066 

Re: Court of Appeals Number: 01-15-00757-CV; Agri-Fine Corporation v. GLNX 

Corporation; in the Court of Appeals – First District of Texas 

 

To whom it may concern: 

 

 Please be advised that this letter is being filed to electronically pay the $205.00 filing fee

to prosecute the above referenced appeal. 

 

 If you have any questions, please email or call. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 /s/ Karen Lovely

 Karen Lovely 

 Assistant to Andrew L. Johnson 

/kl 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00757-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

9/4/2015 3:01:30 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:30 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
SHERRY RADACK

 CHIEF JUSTICE

TERRY JENNINGS

EVELYN KEYES

LAURA CARTER HIGLEY

JANE BLAND

MICHAEL MASSENGALE

HARVEY BROWN

REBECA HUDDLE

RUSSELL LLOYD

 JUSTICES

Court of Appeals

First District of Texas

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT

JANET WILLIAMS

 CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

PHONE: 713-274-2700

FAX: 713-755-8131

 www.txcourts.gov/1stcoa.aspx

September 3, 2015

Andrew McCluggage

Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P.

1 Riverway Ste 1400

Houston, TX 77056-1934

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

William Richards Moye

Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P.

One Riverway Ste 1600

Houston, TX 77056

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Kevin F. Risley

Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P.

One Riverway, Ste 1a00

Houston, TX 77056

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Andrew Johnson

Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LLP

One Riverway, Suite 1400

Houston, TX 77056

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-15-00757-CV Trial Court Case Number: 2014-01353

Style: Agri-Fine Corporation

v.

GLNX Corporation

As of the date of this NOTICE, appellant(s) has not paid the required $205 filing fee to

prosecute this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees at time of filing, unless excused);

see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041

(Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in

the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,

Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees

in court of appeals).

This is NOTICE to the appellant that this appeal is subject to dismissal, if the filing fee has not

been paid within 20 days of this NOTICE. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3

(allowing involuntary dismissal).Sincerely,

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court

FILE COPY
#### Ex parte CRAVENS.

No. 24420.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 18, 1949.

G. H. Crane, Dallas, for appellant.

Will R. Wilson, Jr., Crim. Dist. Atty.,, Dallas, George P. Blackburn, First Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Thomas C. Unis, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Ernest S. Goens, State’s. Atty., Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was indicted by -the grand' jury of Dallas County for the offense ofc *468robbery by assault, a noncapital offense. She was subsequently arrested by the sheriff of said county and placed in jail. She immediately applied to the Honorable Henry King, Judge of Criminal District Court No. 2, of Dallas County, for a writ of habeas corpus.

In her application, she alleged that she is .a white woman; that there was no woman ■on the grand jury which indicted her, although there were many women in Dallas ■County who were qualified for grand jury .■service; that the grand jury was composed ■of twelve men; that this constituted an unjust discrimination against her and therefore the indictment returned by said grand jury was illegal and void.

It seems that on the hearing of the application the state, by and through its district attorney, agreed with appellant that bail in the sum of $1500 would be reasonable and sufficient; that the only issue in the case was whether or not the indictment returned against her by a grand jury ■composed of twelve men was valid. The ■court, by virtue of the stipulation aforesaid, ■set the amount of her bail at $1500 -and remanded her to the custody of the sheriff pending the making of said bond. She excepted to the order of the court, gave notice of appeal to this court, and entered into a recognizance 'in said sum of $1500. If she is at large under the recognizance, the ■question of her restraint has become moot since the release on bail generally destroys the writ. See Tex.Jur., Vol. 21, p. 422, Sec. 5.

Her contention that the indictment is void because it was returned by a grand jury of twelve men is without merit. Art. 5, Section 13, of our Constitution, Vernon's Ann.St., provides as follows : “Grand and petit juries in the District Courts shall be composed of twelve men * * It will be noted that under the provisions of the constitution a legal grand jury is composed of twelve men. This court has heretofore held that a grand jury composed of ten men and two women is an illegal grand jury. See Harper v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 252, 234 S.W. 909; Stroud v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 286, 235 S.W. 214; and Riddle v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 548, 236 S.W. 725. It occurs to us that under the constitution here quoted and the authorities cited, the trial court made and entered the proper order. Appellant cannot utilize the writ of habeas corpus in a case of this nature to test the validity of the indictment.

From what we have said it follows that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Opinion -approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32.2


                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

I, Synnott B. Durham, Treasurer and Chief Financial officer of Sunair
Electronics, Inc. (the "Company"), have executed this certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
(the "Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this certificate as of the
12th day of August 2003.

/s/ Synnott B. Durham
-------------------------------------
Synnott B. Durham
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP-99-301-008]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 13, 2000.
    Take notice that, on October 10, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, to be effective 
August 28, 2000.

Substitute Original Sheet No. 14O
Substitute Original Sheet No. 14P

    ANR states that this filing is made in compliance with the 
Commission's Order dated September 27, 2000 in the captioned 
proceeding.
    ANR states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26837 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26724]



[[Page 62370]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,607 and TA-W-37,607A]


Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc., Now Known as Durango Apparel 
Manufacturing, Inc., Bruceton, TN and New York, NY; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on May 16, 2000, applicable to 
workers of Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc., Bruceton, Tennessee. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on June 8, 2000 (65 FR 36469).
    At the request of the petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of men's and women's jeans, slacks and shorts. 
Findings show that the Department incorrectly set the worker 
certification impact date at April 30, 2000 for the New York, New York 
location. The impact date should be June 30, 1999, one year prior to 
the date of the petition.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-37,607 and TA-W-37,607A is 
hereby issued as follows:


``All workers of Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc., now known as Durango 
Apparel Manufacturing, Inc., Bruceton, Tennessee (TA-W-37,607) who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
April 30, 2000 through May 16, 2002 and ``all workers of Henry I. 
Siegel Co., Inc. now known as Durango Apparel Manufacturing, Inc., 
New York, New York (TA-W-37,607A) who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after June 30, 1999 through May 16, 
2002 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 
223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''


    Signed at Washington, DC this 4th day of October, 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-26724 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of operations and consolidated balance sheet and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000094679
<NAME> STORER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,650
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,671)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         662,701
<DEPRECIATION>                               (293,823)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,936,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        127,148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,238,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,936,664
<SALES>                                        115,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,782
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (101,943)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,176)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,163
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,137)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,026
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,026
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The company utilizes an unclassified balance sheet. As a result, a zero value
is reported for both current assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00216-CV

IN RE BRANCH/MCGOWEN VENTURES LLP a/k/a BMV Retail; 

Ester Branch and Theldon R. Branch, III

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 23, 2014

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay. The 

court is of the opinion that relief should be denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relators’

petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay are denied. Relators shall pay all costs incurred 

in this proceeding.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011CVF000180 D2, styled HK2 IAH LLC d/b/a HK Style and HK Global 

Trading Ltd. v. Branch/McGowen Ventures, LLP a/k/a BMV Retail, et al., pending in the 111th Judicial District Court, 

Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Monica Z. Notzon presiding.