alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Ranny Liang, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Navstar Media Holdings,
Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls or procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
     being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
     fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: April 22, 2008

/s/ Ranny Liang
----------------
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
#### Francis LOFTUS v. STATE.

No. 25597.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 17, 1951.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a penalty of two years in the penitentiary on his conviction for passing a forged instrument.

The transcript contains appellant’s motion to withdraw the appeal. Same is properly executed and his motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.
Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 18-1 Filed 09/11/20 Page 1 of 1
#### Max Winkeeper, Appellant, *v.*General Welding Supply Corp. et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

February 24, 1958.

*Leo A. McGinity*for appellant.

*Luke A. Burke*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The plaintiff made out a prima facie case by establishing use and occupation of the premises by the respective defendants and the illegal storage by those defendants upon their premises of tanks of highly explosive and inflammable gas, with the consequent destruction of the plaintiff’s property by reason of the explosion of those tanks during the course of a debris fire upon the premises. The defendants, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have foreseen that those tanks so stored would, in the event of a fire upon the premises, explode and cause damage to adjoining property. Their failure to have so foreseen constitutes negligence. It is immaterial as to who caused the fire upon the premises or how it was started *(Keizor*v. *City of New York,*303 N. Y. 649). The defendants did not cross-examine the plaintiff’s witnesses nor did they offer any evidence on their case. They rested entirely upon the plain*963tiff’s testimony. Having done so, “ the defendant’s silence was properly accepted by the court as an assurance that he had nothing more to say or to offer.” *(Deeley*v. *Heintz,*169 N. Y. 129, 134.) Pursuant to the power vested in this court by section 584 of the Civil Practice Act judgment on the facts and law is rendered in favor of the plaintiff. Having elected to rest upon the plaintiff’s testimony, the defendants cannot now be given a second opportunity to present evidence which they could have done at the first trial.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to the plaintiff and judgment directed for the plaintiff in the sum of $725, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Pette, Hart and Di Giovanna, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 92-8155

_______________

IN RE:

BOB SLAGLE,

Petitioner.

_________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus to

the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

_________________________ (May 11, 1992)

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

CERTIFICATE OF QUESTION

FROM COURT OF APPEALS

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1254(3)

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The underlying matter involves three redistricting cases

concerning the reapportionment of Texas's legislative and congressional districts, Terrazas v. Richards

, Nos. A-91-CA-425, A-91-CA426, and A-91-CA-428 (W.D. Tex). The three-judge district court

has entered various substantive orders and judgments that effectively require the State of Texas to conduct elections under a

court-ordered, interim redistricting p lan. S ee Terrazas v.2

Richards

, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19860 (Dec. 24, 1991). The orders

have been appealed to the United States Supreme Court and are

pending as No. 91-1270, Richards v. Terrazas

, and No. 91-1546,

Slagle v. Terrazas

.

Petitioner Bob Slagle, Chairman of the Texas Democratic Party,

filed two motions asking the Honorable James Nowlin, a member of

the three-judge panel, to recuse and raised the recusal issue again

in a motion to vacate. Judge Nowlin individually denied the

motions. The petitioner also filed a motion requesting the full

three-judge court to review Judge Nowlin's failure to recuse. That

motion was not acted upon by the three-judge court; instead, Judge

Nowlin individually denied it.

On A pril 1, 1992, the petitoner filed in this court, as No.

92-8155, a petition for writ of mandamus asking the court to compel

Judge Nowlin to disqualify himself from participating in the

ongoing district court proceedings. This court s ua sponte has

raised the question of whether mandamus lies in the court of

appeals or instead in the Supreme Court.

QUESTION CERTIFIED

Where an individual judge, who is a member of a three-judge

district court panel, has denied a motion to disqualify him, does

a petition for writ of mandamus to compel his disqualification lie

in the United States Court of Appeals or, instead, in the United

States Supreme Court?3 REASON FOR THE CERTIFICATE

This question is res nova. Appeals from the orders of threejudge district courts lie in the Supreme Court, but no reported

authority has considered where a petition for writ of mandamus

regarding disqualification lies. In light of the fact that appeals

on the merits in this matter are pending in the Supreme Court, the

Court may wish to address the jur isdictional issue regarding

disqualification.

QUESTION CERTIFIED.
# Službeni list C 27A/27.

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 27A |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Svezak 58.27. siječnja 2015. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 27A

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Svezak 58.27. siječnja 2015.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Ispravci |
| 2015/C 027A/01 | Ispravak Poziva na iskazivanje interesa – Ugovorni djelatnici administratori-istraživači (funkcijska skupina IV) u području parlamentarnog istraživanja — (SL C 55 A, 26.2.2014 .) | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

Ispravci

2015/C 027A/01

Ispravak Poziva na iskazivanje interesa – Ugovorni djelatnici administratori-istraživači (funkcijska skupina IV) u području parlamentarnog istraživanja — (SL C 55 A, 26.2.2014 .)

(SL C 55 A, 26.2.2014 .)

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Ispravci

| 27.1.2015 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CA 27/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2015

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CA 27/1

---

Ispravak Poziva na iskazivanje interesa – Ugovorni djelatnici administratori-istraživači (funkcijska skupina IV) u području parlamentarnog istraživanja

(Službeni list Europske unije
  C 55 A od 26. veljače 2014
  .)

(2015/C 027 A/01)

Na stranici 4., u odjeljku VIII., zadnja rečenica:

umjesto:

„Ugovor se potpisuje u skladu s člancima 3.a, 84. i 85. Uvjeta zaposlenja.”;

treba stajati:

„Ugovor se potpisuje u skladu s člancima 3.b, 84. i 88. Uvjeta zaposlenja.”

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of H&E Equipment Services L.L.C. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leslie S. Magee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/ Leslie S. MageeLeslie S. Magee Chief Financial Officer |  |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 

September 28,
2005

---



QuickLinks
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 49 Filed 04/01/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 49 Filed 04/01/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 49 Filed 04/01/21 Page 3 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 49 Filed 04/01/21 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 10.1


 


 






    	 	1	 



     

    

 


 






    	 	2	 



     

    

 


 






    	 	3	 



     

    

 


 






    	 	4	 



     

    

 


 






    	 	5	 



     

    

 


 






    	 	6	 



     

    

 


 






    	 	7
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



The Manager and Member
DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-106332) on Form S-3 of CARCO Auto Loan Master Trust of our report dated
March 26, 2004, relating to the statements of assets, liabilities and equity
arising from cash transactions of DaimlerChrysler Master Owner Trust (the
"Trust") as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of cash
receipts and disbursements for the year ended December 31, 2003 and the period
June 1, 2002 (inception) through December 31, 2002, which report appears in the
December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of the Trust.

Our report dated March 26, 2004 contains an explanatory paragraph stating that
the financial statements were prepared on the basis of cash receipts and
disbursements, which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 30, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-4798

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BENJAMIN DELANO KIRBY, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CR-99-

463-AMD)

Submitted: March 13, 2003 Decided: March 26, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Smith, Jr., SMITH & GARRETT, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Harvey E.

Eisenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Kirby appeals his conviction and 188-month sentence

imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to

possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine, in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000). Because we conclude that Kirby’s

waiver of his appellate rights was knowing and voluntary, we

dismiss his appeal. See United States v. Attar, 38 F.3d 727, 731

(4th Cir. 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

ALEX PROIMOS, § 

§ 

Plaintiff, § 

§ 

v. § 1-20-CV-662-RP

§ 

THRIVEWORKS SOLUTIONS, LLC, § 

§ 

Defendant. § 

 

ORDER

 Before the Court is the parties’ stipulation extending Defendant Thriveworks Solutions, 

LLC’s (“Thriveworks”) deadline to respond to Plaintiff Alex Proimos’s (“Proimos”) complaint. 

(Dkt. 1). The parties have agreed to extend the deadline for Thriveworks to respond to Proimos’s 

complaint until October 5, 2020. (Id.).

A stipulation to extend a deadline set by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is ineffective 

without court approval. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b); 4A Charles A. Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal 

Practice and Procedure § 1165 at 488 (“A stipulation by the parties for an extension of time is 

ineffective if it is not also embodied in an order of the district court.”). The Court will, however, 

construe the parties’ stipulation as a joint motion for extension of time, and it will grant that motion. 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Thriveworks shall file an answer or otherwise respond 

to Proimos’s complaint on or before October 5, 2020. The parties shall seek future extensions of 

time in the form of a motion. 

 SIGNED on August 21, 2020. 

_____________________________________

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00662-RP Document 7 Filed 08/21/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1
 
  1)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 28,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended June 28, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Carl H. Guild, Jr.

Carl H. Guild, Jr.
    
    
    
    /s/ Michael P. Malone

Michael P. MalonePresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 11, 2008
    
    
    
    Date: August 11, 2008
NATASHA MERIERI LOVOLD

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5191

___ _________________________/

Opinion filed March 18, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Scott Duncan , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appella nt.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, CLARK, and WETHERELL

, J J

. , CONCUR.
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Movie Star, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated: November 10, 2005                           /s/ Melvyn Knigin
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Melvyn Knigin
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 10, 2005

                                                   /s/ Thomas Rende
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Thomas Rende
                                                   Chief Financial Officer and
                                                   Principal Accounting Officer
```
##### 



Exhibit 99.1 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
CREDIT CORPORATION Michael J. GillespieAccounting Director Officers Certificate Pursuant to the Servicing Agreement between Morgan Stanley Dean Witter
Credit Corporation, formerly known as NOVUS Financial Corporation, as
seller and servicer (referred to herein in such capacity as the
Servicer , and Redwood Trust, Inc., as Owner, the undersigned, hereby
states that: (1) A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its
performance under the
Servicing Agreement during the calendar year ended December 31,
2003 has been made
under may supervision; and (2) To
the best of may knowledge, based on such review, the
Servicer has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period. MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
CREDIT CORPORATIONBy
    

-s-
Douglas J. BushDouglas J. BushTitle
    
    DirectorDated as of December 31, 2003By
    

-s-
David BianucciDavid BianucciTitle
    
    Vice PresidentDated as of December 31, 2003
 2500 Lake Cook Road, J
East, Riverwoods, Illinois 60015 Tel (224) 405-1903
EXHIBIT 99.8



CERTIFICATION



I, Cameron R. Sebastian, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Paramount Energy Trust;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



---



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.





November 29, 2005

Calgary Alberta

Per:

(signed by) Cameron R. Sebastian

Cameron R. Sebastian

Vice-President, Finance and

Chief Financial Officer

Paramount Energy Operating Corp.

in its capacity as Administrator of Paramount Energy Trust
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-30 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Dennis OBrien, director and Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer of Superior Silver Mines, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 13, 2008



By    /s/ Dennis OBrien



Dennis OBrien, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer