alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit ‘E’

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 120-5 Filed 07/17/23 Page 1 of 6
Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 120-5 Filed 07/17/23 Page 2 of 6
Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 120-5 Filed 07/17/23 Page 3 of 6
Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 120-5 Filed 07/17/23 Page 4 of 6
Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 120-5 Filed 07/17/23 Page 5 of 6
Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 120-5 Filed 07/17/23 Page 6 of 6
**
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe Annual Report of CytoDyn Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended May 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

 
/s/ Nader Z. Pourhassan  /s/ Michael D. Mulholland
Nader Z. Pourhassan, Ph. D.

President and ChiefExecutive Officer

September 28, 2018
  
Michael D. Mulholland

Chief FinancialOfficer

September 28, 2018

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CytoDyn Inc. and will beretained by CytoDyn Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
Record of Discussion

Docket No. FAA-2013-0205 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-226-AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design

Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc.)

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED

ATA Joe White 11/5/12 No response.

Boeing Barry Bannister 11/5/12 No response.

Other/Additional Information:
#### G. W. MASON, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

Na. 24062.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 26, 1948.

Nielsen & McCormick, of Raymondville, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a companion case to that of W. W. Grayson, Jr. v. State, 211 S.W.2d 749.

For the reasons there stated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Lingo Media Corporation, formerly Lingo Media Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.  Date:  March 11, 2008  By: /s/  Michael P. Kraft _____________________ Michael P. Kraft President and Chief Executive Officer    Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Lingo Media Corporation, formerly Lingo Media Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.  Date:  March 11, 2008  By: /s/  Khurram R. Qureshi _______________________ Khurram R. Qureshi Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a §

BRAZOS LICENSING AND §

DEVELOPMENT § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-573[ADA]

§

v. §

§

GOOGLE LLC §

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT GOOGLE LLC TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND

Before the Court is Defendant Google LLC’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to 

Answer or Otherwise Respond. After consideration of said unopposed motion, the Court finds that 

it should be GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Google LLC has up to and including September 11, 

2020 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing 

and Development’s Original Complaint for Patent Infringement.

SIGNED this ______ day of ______________, 2020.

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 13-1 Filed 07/20/20 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of StockerYale, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark W.
Blodgett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark W. Blodgett                 
|Mark W. Blodgett                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|May 15, 2008
Opinion issued August 17 , 2021

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 19
- 00779
- CV

——————————— CORINA ELLIOTT A/K/A CORINA GARCIA, MERRITT ELLIOTT,

AND CORINA MENDEZ , Appella nt s

V. ROB A. COTY , Appell e e

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 1

Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2019
- 001766
- 1

MEMORANDU M OPINION Appellant s have failed to timely file a brief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant s did not respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecutio n for failure to timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Countiss.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-14767

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 0:06-cr-60248-FAM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

STANLEY MCCRAY, 

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(May 29, 2014)

Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Stanley McCray appeals pro se the denial of his post-judgment motion to 

amend and correct his presentence investigation report. McCray argues that the 

Case: 13-14767 Date Filed: 05/29/2014 Page: 1 of 3 
2

presentencing investigation report erroneously stated that he had been convicted of 

aggravated assault when he instead had pleaded guilty to a lesser-included charge

and that his sentence should not have been enhanced under the Armed Career 

Criminal Act. McCray filed his motion nearly seven years after his criminal 

conviction became final. We vacate and remand with instructions to dismiss for 

lack of jurisdiction. 

We review de novo jurisdictional issues. United States v. Lopez, 562 F.3d 

1309, 1311 (11th Cir. 2009). 

The district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain McCray’s motion several

years after his sentence was imposed. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 

governs the preparation of presentencing reports, but it provides no jurisdiction for 

correcting a report after a judgment of conviction and sentence has been entered. 

Fed. R. Crim. P. 32; United States v. Fischer, 821 F.2d 557, 558 (11th Cir. 1987). 

An error in the report may instead be challenged on direct appeal. United States v. 

Peloso, 824 F.2d 914, 915 (11th Cir. 1987). Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

35 permits a district court to correct a sentence for an arithmetical, technical, or 

other clear error, but only within 14 days of sentencing. Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). 

And Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 permits a district court, at any time, to 

correct a clerical error or an error in the record arising from oversight or omission. 

Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. But a motion under Rule 36 may not be used to make 

Case: 13-14767 Date Filed: 05/29/2014 Page: 2 of 3 
3

substantive alterations to a sentence. United States v. Portillo, 363 F.3d 1161, 

1164 (11th Cir. 2004). And a defendant cannot challenge the accuracy of his 

presentencing investigation report for the first time in a collateral attack. Simmons 

v. United States, 777 F.2d 660, 661–62 (11th Cir. 1985). Moreover, a collateral 

attack by McCray would be barred as successive unless he first obtained 

permission from this Court to file his motion. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Because the 

district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain McCray’s motion, we vacate and 

remand with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 

VACATED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Case: 13-14767 Date Filed: 05/29/2014 Page: 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                                                                    PO Box 84013
                                                          Columbus GA 31908-4013
                                                               Tel. 800.784.5566

                                                     [GREENPOINT MORTGAGE LOGO]

TO : RWT HOLDINGS, INC.

      Re : Annual Statement as to Compliance by the Seller

      Pursuant to Section 6.04 of the Mortgage Loan Flow Purchase, Sale, and
Servicing Agreement between GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. as Seller (the
"Seller") and RWT Holdings, Inc. as Purchaser, dated as of August 1, 2002 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned officer of the Seller, hereby certifies as to the
following:

            (i) a review of the activities of the Seller during the calendar
      year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Applicable Period") and of the Seller's
      performance under the Agreement has been made under the direct supervision
      of the undersigned officer; and

            (ii) to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such
      review, the Seller has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      Agreement throughout the Applicable Period, and there has been no known
      default in the fulfillment of the Seller's obligations throughout such
      Applicable Period.

                                            Very Truly Yours

                                            GREENPOINT MORTGAGE
                                            FUNDING, INC.
                                            as Seller

                                            /s/ Roy Briggs
                                            ----------------------
                                            Name: Roy Briggs
                                            Title: Vice President

                AVISO IMPORTANTE PARS LAS PERSONAS HABLA ESPANOL

Si usted no entiendo el contenido de esta coarts profavor obtonga unotroduction
                                  immedianente

                 2300 BROOKSTONC CENTRE PKWY COLUMBUS GA 31904
      CUSTOMER SERVICE HOURS: MONDAY - FRIDAY, 8:30 AM - 8:00 PM, EASTERN
                           WWW.GREENPOINTSERVICE.COM
Exhibit 1.5



|         |               
|-------- | --------------
|BRITISH  | NUMBER: 494759
|COLUMBIA |               









|                                 |                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|-------------------------------- | --------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATE                     
|OF                              
|CHANGE OF NAME                  
|COMPANY ACT                     
|                                 | I Hereby Certify that | I hereby certify that the within Instrument is a true and correct copy of the Instrument of which it purports to be a true copy.
Given under my hand and seal of office this 11THday ofMarch A.D 2005

/s/ Gregory Smith
A Notary Public in and for the Province of British Columbia
|                                
|CONTINENTAL RIDGE RESOURCES INC.
|                                
|                                
|                                
|has this day changed its name to
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER INC.    
|                                







Issuedunder my hand at Victoria, British Columbia
On May 13, 2003

/s/ John S. Powell

JOHN S. POWELL
Registrar of Companies
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
CANADA
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00321

- CR

Tyler James Layton

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 355th District Court

o f Hood County (CR13017 )

Fe bruary 25, 2016

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SE COND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
**Exhibit99.11**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the AnnualReport of Canadian Superior Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger Harman, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 16, 2007
|        | By:    | /s/ ROGER HARMAN |                    |
|--------|--------|------------------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Name:            | Roger Harman            |
|   |   | Title:           | Chief Financial Officer |
|        |        |                  |                         |  |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00552-CR

Lisa D. Wall

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From County Criminal Court No. 4

of Denton County (CR-2012-01008-

D)

May 7, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker____________________

 Justice Sue Walker
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

 SAN ANTONIO DIVISION 

MELODY JOY CANTU and § 

DR. RODRIGO CANTU, § 

 § 

 Plaintiffs, § 

§ 

v. § SA-20-CV-746-JKP (HJB) 

§ 

DR. SANDRA GUERRA and § 

DIGITAL FORENSICS CORPORATION, § 

 § 

 Defendants. § 

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER 

Before the Court is the Continuance Request on Consent of All Parties. (Docket Entry 42.) 

It is hereby ORDERED that the parties’ request to continue the Scheduling Order deadlines is 

GRANTED, and the following dates are entered to further control the course of this case: 

1. The parties shall file a report on alternative dispute resolution in compliance with 

Local Rule CV-88(b) on or before March 15, 2021. 

2. Parties asserting claims for relief shall submit a written offer of settlement to 

opposing parties on or before March 15, 2021, and each opposing party shall respond, in writing 

on or before April 1, 2021. All offers of settlement are to be private, not filed. The parties are 

ordered to retain the written offers of settlement and response as the Court will use these in 

assessing attorneys’ fees and costs at the conclusion of the proceedings. If a settlement is reached, 

the parties should immediately notify the Court so the case may be closed.

3. Parties asserting claims for relief shall file their designation of testifying experts 

and serve on all parties, but not file, the materials required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

26(a)(2)(B) on or before March 17, 2021. 

4. On or before April 16, 2021, the parties shall file any motion seeking leave to 

amend pleadings or join parties. 

 

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 43 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 2
2 

5. Parties resisting claims for relief shall file their designation of testifying experts 

and serve on all parties, but not file, the materials required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

26(a)(2)(B) on or before May 3, 2021. 

6. Parties shall file all designations of rebuttal experts and serve on all parties the 

material required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) for such rebuttal experts, to the 

extent not already served, within fourteen days of receipt of the report of the opposing expert. 

7. Parties shall initiate all discovery procedures in time to complete discovery on or 

before June 17, 2021. 

8. Counsel shall confer and file a joint report setting forth the status of settlement 

negotiations on or before June 30, 2021. 

9. All dispositive motions must be filed by July 16, 2021. Dispositive motions, and 

responses to dispositive motions, must be limited to 20 pages in length which is the standard page 

limit for this Court. (See WDTX, SA Div., Local Rule CV-7(h).)

10. The District Court will set dates for trial and the final pretrial conference after 

receiving and reviewing filed dispositive motions or after the deadline for such motions passes 

without a pertinent filing. At that time, it will likewise set appropriate deadlines for trial and pretrial 

conference matters.

SIGNED on February 12, 2021. 

 

Henry J. Bemporad 

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 43 Filed 02/12/21 Page 2 of 2
Docket No: FAA

- 2015

- 4810 Dir ID: 2015

- NM

- 090

- AD

. Contacts. With w h om o u tsi d e the F A A has t h is pr o p os al be en dis c u s se d ?

Org a ni z a t i on Per s on C o nta c ted Da t e Re sp on s e

Nat i onal Bus i ness Aircraft As s o ciat i o n Eli Cotti 6 / 4 / 1 5

R e gio n al Airline As s o ci a ti o n 6 / 4 / 15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 6 / 4 / 1 5

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 6 / 4 / 1 5
#### Ex parte LUCAS.

No. 24824.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 5, 1950.

See also 211 S.W.2d 222; 216 S.W.2d 820.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

. PER CURIAM.

Insofar as the attached petition for the writ of habeas corpus seeks redress because of the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel for relator, in the two cases mentioned, the records of this Court reflect that in one of the cases relator was represented by counsel, while the other is. not of such nature or character as would require the appointment of counsel in order to preserve due process.

Other allegations in the petition attempting to .assert a denial of due process are so vague, indefinite, and uncertain as to be meaningless.

For the reasons stated, the petition for the writ of habeas corpus is, refused.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-6611-6]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564-7167 or www.epa.gov/​oeca/​ofa

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements 

Filed October 02, 2000 Through October 06, 2000 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. 

EIS No. 000345, FINAL EIS, COE, DE, Fenwick Island Feasibility Study, Storm Damage Reduction, Delaware Coast from Cape Henlopen to Fenwick Island, Protective Berm and Dune Construction, Community of Fenwick Island, Sussex County, DE, Due: November 13, 2000, Contact: Steve Allen (215) 656-6555. 

EIS No. 000346, FINAL EIS, NPS, CA, Anacapa Island Restoration Project, Implementation, Channel Islands National Park, Ventura County, CA, Due: November 13, 2000, Contact: Alan Schmierer (415) 427-1441.

## Amended Notices

                    EIS No. 000338, DRAFT EIS, STB, SD, WY, MN, Powder River Basin Expansion Project, Construction of                           ( print page 60940)                        New Rail Facilities, Finance Docket No. 33407 Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern Railroad, SD, WY and MN, Due: January 05, 2001, Contact: Victoria Rutson (202) 565-1545. Revision of FR notice published on 10/06/2000: CEQ Comment Date corrected from 11/20/2000 to 01/05/2001.                 

Dated: October 10, 2000.

Joseph C. Montgomery,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 00-26386 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P