T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

* * T he H onor abl e S ha r on L . G l e a s on, U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A l a s ka , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on.

NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. MAR T I N G AR C I A, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 35820 D . C. N o s . 1 : 0 9 - c v - 0 0 1 0 3 - RFC 1: 04 -c r- 00 08 7-R F C -1

ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont a na R i c ha r d F . C e bul l , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r6, 2012

S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B ef ore: T A L L M A N and W A T F O R D , C i rc ui tJudg es , and G L E A S O N , D i stri ct Judg e. ** F e de r a l pr i s one rM a r t i n G a r c i aappe a l s the di s tr i c tc our t ’ s de ni a l of hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2255 m ot i on c ha l l e ngi ng hi s j ury c onvi c t i on a nd 720- m onth s e nt e nc e f or 

# FI LED DE C 19 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

m u ltip le c o u n ts in c lu d in g c o n s p ir a c y to p o s s e s s w ith in te n t to d is tr ib u te m etham ph et am i ne; po ss es si on w i th i nt entt o d i stri bu t e m etham ph et am i ne; po ss es si on of m etham ph et am i ne, usi ng or ca rryi ng a f i re arm i n furthera nce of a d ru g tr a f f ic k in g c r im e ; a n d m o n e y la u n d e r in g . G ar ci a c l ai m s thatun der N a p u e v . I llin o is , 360 U . S . 264 ( 1959) , hi s due p ro ce ss rig h ts w er e v io lated at h is trial i n tw o re sp ec ts. F irst, th e G o v er n m en t’ s m ai n w i tness , G w ynne B l ac k, had rece i ved u se i m m un i ty butt es t i fi ed attri al that s he c oul d notr e c a l l r e c e i vi ng a ny pr om i s e s f r om the G ove rnm e nti n e xc ha nge f or h e rt e s t i mo n y . Th e p r o s e c u t o rf a i l e d t o c o rr e c tth i s f

a l s e h o o d . G a r c i aa l s o c l a i ms the G ov ernm entvi ol at ed hi s due proces s r i gh t s by f ai l i ng t o exp ose i ncon si st enci es betw ee n p ri or st at em ent s gi ven and tri al t es t i m on y provi ded b y both B l ac k and her m o th e r , P a tr ic iaP r e m . G ar ci a a l so al l eges thathi s tri al coun se l re nd er ed i neff ec t i ve as si st ance b ecau se h e fai l ed t o i m p each B l ack w i th th e i m m u n i ty l ett ers an d fai l ed t o ex p o se i ncon si st enci es i n the grand j ury t es t i m on y, F . B . I. form 30 2 st at em ent s, and tri al te s tim o n y o f

b o th B la c k a n d P r e m . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 5 , a n d w e a f f i rm. W i th r e s pe c tt o the f

i r s ta l l e ge d N

ap ue vi ol a t i on, G a r c i ae s t abl i s he d a nd the G ove rnm e ntc onc e de s tha ta due pr oc e s s vi ol a t i on oc c urr e d w he n the pr os e c ut or3

f a ile d to c o rr e c t B la c k ’s te s tim o n y r e g a r d in g th e u s e im m u n ity s h e h a d r e c e iv e d . B utt o o bt ai n rel i ef

on thi s bas i s, G ar ci a m ustal so show thatthe vi ol at i on w as

“ m a t e r i a l , ” tha ti s , he m us ts how a“ r e a s onabl e l i ke l i hood tha tthe f a l s e t e s t i m ony coul d h ave a ff

ec t ed the j ud gm entof the j ury. ” H a y e s v . Br o wn , 399 F . 3d 972, 985 (9th C i r. 20 05 )( en banc). H er e, B l ac k’ s f al se t es t i m on y w as subst ant i al l y c orre ct ed du ri ng her c ross exam i nat i on , w hen she confi rm ed thatshe had no tbeen charged f e d e r a lly w ith o f

f e n s e s th a t c o u ld h a v e c a rr ie d a s e n te n c e o f 2 5 y e a r s o rm o r e in p r is o n , a n d a c k n o w le d g e d th a t in s te a d s h e h a d b e e n p e rm itte d to p le a d g u ilty to offe nses i n st at e c ou rtfor w hi ch she s erved o nl y one m on th i n j ai l . B l ac k agreed w i th de f e ns e c ouns e l tha ts he w a s r e c e i vi ng a“ r a the rl a r ge be ne f i t ” f ort e s t i f y i ng a ga i ns tG a r c i a . B e c a us e the j ury he a r d the s e a ddi t i ona l f a c t s on c r os s - e xa m i na t i on, the r e i s no r e a s onabl e l i ke l i hood tha tB l a c k’ s f a l s e t e s t i m ony on di r e c ta f f e c t e d the ju ry ’s v e r d ic t. A s t o the s e c ond a l l e ge d N apue vi ol a t i on, G a r c i aha s nots how n tha tthe G ove rnm e nt ’ s a l l e ge d f a i l ur e a ttr i a l t o r e ve a l i nc ons i s t e nc i e s be tw e e n the pr i or s t a t e m e nt s a nd tr i a l t e s t i m ony of tw o G ove rnm e ntw i tne s s e s vi ol a t e d G a r c i a ’ s r i ght t o due pr oc e s s . R a the r , thi s C our ta gr e e s w i th the di s tr i c tc our t ’ s f i ndi ng tha tthe di s c r e pa nc i e s i n the i rt e s t i m ony “ a r e e a s i l y unde r s t ood a s unr e m a rkabl e tr i c ks of m em ory, no tou tri gh tl i es , ” a nd that“ B l ac k’ s t es t i m on y w as corr ob orat ed i n k ey4

r e s pe c t s e s t abl i s hi ng G a r c i a ’ s gui l tbe y ond a r e a s onabl e doubton the c ount s of conv i ct i on . ” W i th res pectt o G ar ci a’ s i neff ec t i ve as si st ance cl ai m un der Stri cklan d v. W as hi ngton , 46 6 U . S . 66 8 (19 84 ), the di stri ctcourtdet erm i ned aft eran evi dent i ary h e a r in g th a t G a r c iah a d f a ile d to d e m o n s tr a te th a t h is S ix th A m e n d m e n t r ig h t to coun se l w as vi ol at ed. W e a gree . G ar ci a has no tshow n thattri al coun se l w as d e f ic ie n t f o rf a ilin g to im p e a c h B la c k w ith th e im m u n ity le tte r s , o rin f a ilin g to p o i n to u tv ari o u s i n co n si st en ci es i n B l ack ’ s an d P rem ’ s t est i m o n y o n cro ssexam i nat i on . R ather, G ar ci a’ s a tt orney m ade asoun d stra t egi c dec i si on that gr e a t e rha rm c oul d ha ve be e n done by s uc h c r os s e xa m i na t i on, a s i tw oul d ha ve al l ow ed tho se tw o w i tness es t o res t at e or e m ph as i ze the t es t i m on y i ni t i al l y e l i ci t ed i n di r e c te xa m i na t i on tha ts uppor t e d the G ove rnm e nt ’ s the ory tha tG a r c i aw a s the tru e s o u r c e o f

th e m e th a m p h e ta m in e , a n d n o t “A le x .” G a r c iah a s a ls o f a ile d to sh o w th ath e su ffered p rej u d i ce as a resu l to f an y o f th ese al l eg ed d efi ci en ci es. AF F I RME D.