alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Date: October 1, 2015

Subject: Minutes of the conference calls with representa tives of the Aerospace Industries

Association to discuss comments on proposed amendments to the Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities NESHAP on September 2, 3, and 25, 2015.

I. Introduction

Representatives of the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) and the requested a conference call with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) staff on September 2, 2015. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss comments on the proposed rule amendments for the Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework NESHAP (40 CFR 63, subpart GG) publishe d on February 17, 2015 (80 FR 8392). The meeting ran long and was continued (and concl uded) during a subsequent conference call on September 3, 2015. The AIA also requeste d and held a final conference call with the EPA on September 25, 2015 to provide additional in formation as a follow up to the calls on September 2 and 3. This memorandum summarizes the majo r topics discussed during all three

conference calls.

II. Participants

Shannon Broome, Katten Munchin Rosenman (AIA) Chuck Knauss, Katten Munchin Rosenman (AIA) Julie Cress, Katten Munchin Rosenman (AIA) Carl Jacobsen, Lockheed Martin George Jung, Northrop Grumman Chris Santucci, Pratt & Whitney Dave Moore, The Boeing Company Matt Iwicki, The Boeing Company Kim Teal, USEPA/OAQPS Keith Barnett, USEPA/OAQPS Brian Palmer, ERG John Carter, ERG

III. Discussion

The purpose of this meeting was to discuss AIA’s comments o n the aerospace rule relative to NESHAP exemptions. The AIA provided comments and suggested e dits to the rule text related to the following requested changes to subpart GG that were also included in their comments submitted on the proposed rule:

• Exemption from all requirements for specialty coatings us ed in low volumes and for specialty coatings that are HAP-free;

• Exemption from inorganic HAP limitations for certain t ypes of coating application methods and in certain situations;

• Exemption from organic HAP limits for coatings used in c ertain situations; and

• Exemption from application equipment requirements for ce rtain types of coatings; and2

• Allowing certain types of coating application equipment w ithout having to demonstrate equivalency to the currently allowed high-efficiency equip ment.

A copy of document provided by the AIA with their suggested ed its to the rule text with AIA's comments are attached to this summary of the meeting. AIA explained their position on each issue and provided input from industry members who were also participating in the calls. In response to the issues raised by AIA’s comments, EPA ei ther acknowledged the input provided by AIA, provided some basic feedback to AIA on the issue, or responded that EPA understood the comments and would respond accordingly in the final versi on of the rule.
EXHIBIT 99.7



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 15D-14B AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Susan L. Riddell Rose, Chief Executive Officer of Paramount Energy Operating Corp. in its capacity as Administrator of Paramount Energy Trust (the "Trust"), hereby certifies, to her knowledge, that the Trusts annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of and for the periods presented.



March 21, 2006

Calgary, Alberta

Per:

signed



Susan L. Riddell Rose

Chief Executive Officer

Paramount Energy Operating Corp.

in its capacity as Administrator of Paramount Energy Trust
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2737 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2737

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 
            gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2013

   Mr. Lewis (for himself, Ms. Norton, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Rangel, Mr. 
 Ellison, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Shea-Porter, 
 and Ms. DeLauro) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 
            gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Segal AmeriCorps Education Award Tax 
Relief Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF AMERICORPS EDUCATIONAL AWARDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 117 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to qualified scholarships) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(e) AmeriCorps Educational Awards.--Gross income shall not 
include any national service educational award described in subtitle D 
of title I of the National and Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 
12601 et seq.).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5645 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing Azadirachtin A. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. GOSAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing 

Azadirachtin A. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING AZADIRACHTIN A. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5645 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures containing Dimethyl (2aR, 3S, 4S, 

4aR,5S,7aS,8S,10R, 

10aS,10bR)-10-(acetyloxy)- 

3,5- dihydroxy-4- 

[(1aR,2S,3aS,6aS, 

7S,7aS)-6a-hydroxy-7amethyl- 3a,6a,7,7atetrahydro-2,7- 

methanofuro[2,3- 

b]oxireno[e] oxepin1a(2H)-yl]-4- methyl-8- 

{[(2E)-2-methylbut-2- 

enoyl]oxy} octahydro-1Hnaphtho[1,8a-c:4, 5- 

b’c’]difuran-5,10a(8H)- 

dicarboxylate (Azadirachtin 

A) (CAS No. 11141–17–6) 

(provided for in subheading 3808.91.50) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0517

DCN:_____07479A22__________________________ 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT, AT HOUSTON

No. 14-14-00294-CV

City of Galveston, Dorothy Palumbo, City Attorney and Sterling W. Patrick, 

Director of Grants and Housing

v.

CDM Smith, Inc.

(No. 13-CV-0844 IN 56TH DISTRICT COURT OF GALVESTON COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

SUPP CLK RECORD

CLK RECORD

RPT RECORD

STATEWIDE EFILING

FILING

$10.00

$15.00

$15.00

$10.00

$10.00

$66.00

$779.00

$144.00

$20.00

$175.00

05/06/2015

05/06/2015

04/15/2015

12/17/2014

11/24/2014

05/05/2014

04/29/2014

04/28/2014

04/23/2014

04/23/2014

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

APE

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals Houston, Texas 

are $1,244.00.

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, CLERK OF THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF 

APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing 

is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 
FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the 

above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness 

my hand and the Seal of the COURT 

OF APPEALS for the Fourteenth District 

of Texas, December 11, 2015.
#### Societe Metallurgica Italiana, Appellant, *v.*Grace Line Inc., Respondent, and American Export Lines, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

April 25, 1957.

*359
      *David L. Maloof*for appellant.

*Alfred J. Skidmore*for respondent.

*M. E. De Orchis*for respondent-appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment dismissing the complaint against the defendant Grace Line Inc. and dismissing the cross complaint of defendant American Export Lines, Inc., against Grace Line, Inc. is supported by the record and is therefore affirmed. However the stipulation upon which defendant American Export Lines, Inc., relies to relieve it of liability to the plaintiff is not broad enough to accomplish such a result. Plaintiff proved that American Export finally delivered 3,976 cathodes or 13 short of the number delivered by plaintiffs to Grace, the initial carrier.

Pursuant to subdivision (2) of section 3 of the United States Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (U. S. Code, tit. 28, § 1303, subd. [2]) the last carrier is required to prove that it discharged the same quantity of goods at destination as originally received by it. Having admitted short delivery, American Export was obliged to overcome the presumption that it was responsible for the loss and it offered no proof that it received only 3,976 cathodes from Grace in New York.

Consequently the judgment dismissing the complaint against American Export Lines, Inc., was improper and should be reversed and a new trial had between plaintiff and defendant American Export Lines, Inc.

The judgment should be modified by reversing judgment in favor of American Export Lines, Inc. against plaintiff and a new trial ordered between said parties, with $25 costs to plaintiff, and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to respondent Grace Line Inc.

Hofstadter, Stbuer and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment modified, etc.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 4/25/96 TENTH CIRCUIT SUSAN D. PYTEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 95-1354 v. (D.C. No. 94-C-1421) H. RICKEY WELLS and KN ENERGY, INC., (D. Colo.)

Defendants - Appellees.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. We affirm for the reasons provided by the district court. Plaintiff, acting pro se and in forma pauperis, also filed a request for emergency injunctive relief (and petition2

for an extraordinary writ) against the Defendants H. Rickey Wells and KN Energy, Inc., in this case. Plaintiff is currently in residence at the Colorado Mental Health Institute, and she is challenging her institutionalization through her request/petition. We cannot grant the relief Plaintiff is requesting against the defendants she has listed. Therefore, Plaintiff’s request for emergency relief and/or an extraordinary writ is denied. Plaintiff’s motion to supplement the record and her petition for an extraordinary writ regarding disability checks are also denied.

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

GOOGLE LLC

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00571-ADA

ORDER CANCELLING TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case having been set

for TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE on Friday, October 16, 2020 at 01:30

PM is hereby CANCELLED until further order of the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of October, 2020.

______________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 25 Filed 10/16/20 Page 1 of 1
#### FRITZ v. STATE.

No. 22626.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 15, 1943.

Bert G. Ashby, of Dallas, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is the possession of whisky in a container to which no stamp was áffixed showing the payment of the tax due thereon to the State of Texas. The punishment assessed is a fine of $500.

The record discloses that on the first day of May, 1943, appellant appeared in the office of 'the county judge, which is located in the court house of Lamar County, waived a jury and entered a plea of guilty to the charge. The court received his plea and assessed his punishment as above stated. The term of the court expired at midnight of the same day. Thereafter, on the 28th day of May, appellant filed a motion protesting the entry of a judgment nunc pro tunc on the ground that the judgment pronounced against him by the court on the first day of May was void and of no force and effect inasmuch as his trial was had in the private office of the judge and not in the regular court room. The court overruled the motion *188and entered the judgment nunc pro tunc, to which appellant excepted and brings the matter to this court for review by a bill of exception. The court qualified the bill with the statement that his office, where appellant entered the plea of guilty, was located in the court house of Lamar County; that no one was ever denied admittance to his office during the proceedings.

The question here presented was this day decided by this court adversely to appellant’s contention. See Tischmacher v. State, 176 S.W.2d 188. For the reasons therein stated the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation. 

# ACTION:

Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Public Law 95-541. 

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On August 29, 2000, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of permit applications received. Permits were issued on October 5, 2000 to the following applicants:                

Terry J. Wilson Permit No. 2001-009 

Mahlon C. Kennicutt Permit No. 2001-012 

Brenda Hall Permit No. 2001-013 

William Swanson Permit No. 2001-019 

Richard M. Jones Permit No. 2001-020 

Nadene G. Kennedy, 

Permit Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-26647 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5660 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Reactive Red 267. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Reactive Red 

267. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REACTIVE RED 267. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5660 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,4-Benzenedisulfonic acid, 

2,2’-[(1-methyl-1,2- 

ethanediyl)bis[imino(6- 

fluoro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2- 

diyl)imino(1-hydroxy-3- 

sulfo-6,2- 

naphthalenediyl)azo]]bis[5- 

methoxy-, sodium salt (Reactive Red 267) (CAS No. 

155522–07–9) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.16.30) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of Downside Up, Inc.
(the  "Company")  for the  period  ended  April  30,  2004,  as  filed  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, the
undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date  indicated  below,  hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     a)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     b)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     Date:  June 23, 2004                        By:  /s/ James B. Wiegand
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     James B. Wiegand,
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-5131

ROBERTA B.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

Albert L. Sanders, Jr. , Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, of Washington,

DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was W. Randolph Teslik

.

Harold D. Lester, Jr. , Assistant Director, Commerc ial Litigation Branch, Civil

Division, United States Depa rtment of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for

defendant-appellee. On the brief were Peter D. Keisler , Assistant Attorney General,

Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, Patricia M. McCarthy , Assistant Director, and Andrew P.

Averbach , Trial Attorney.

Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims

Senior Judge John P. WieseNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-5131

ROBERTA B.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.



## JUDGMENT

ON APPEAL from the United Stat es Court of Federal Claims

In CASE NO(S). 03-CV-1871

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, RADER, and PROST, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: August 17, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Foxx: 

On June 24, 2014, the communities of Franklin and Oil City, and the Venango County Regional 

Airport, were served with the Department of Transportation Order 2014-6-6; Terminating EAS 

Eligibility and Establishing Waiver Procedures for possible continuation or reinstatement of 

commercial air service to the region. 

For several years, the Airport Manager at Venango County Regional airport has worked to restore 

service to Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT), which is the preferred and regular connector for 

airline passengers from this region. There is now an opportunity to regain service to PIT with an 

airline carrier committed to the local communities through an effective business model which 

has a proven track record of implementation in smaller regions. 

On behalf of Joy Global employees in the Oil Heritage Region whom utilize air services provided 

by the Venango County Regional Airport, I am writing to express my support for a waiver for the 

Franklin and Oil City communities so they may have an opportunity to assess more dependable 

travel options and for timely commercial air service to PIT. Joy Global is the second largest 

employer in Venango County and the restoration of the connection to PIT will be a crucial part of 

the area's economic landscape for future growth and prosperity. 

Thank you for your time. 

Sincerely, 

Cinda Richards 

Human Resource Manager, Global Engineering 

Cc: Senator Bob Casey 

Congressmen Glenn Thompson 

Governor Tom Corbett 

Penn Dot Secretary Barry Scoch 

Commissioners, County of Venango 

File 

120 liberty Street I Franklin, PA 16323 

+1814 432 1751
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00167-CV

City of McAllen, Texas and Mike R. Perez, In His Official Capacity as City Manager

v.

Othal E. Brand

On Appeal from the

398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-1763-12-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERED. Costs of the 

appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 2, 2015