60472 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 11, 2000 / Notices

(B) The Licensee respond in writing to

the Notice pursuant to the provisions of

10 CFR 2.201 within 30 days of the date

of this Order addressing: (1) Admission

or denial of the alleged violations, (2)

the reasons for the violations if

admitted, and if denied, the reasons

why, (3) the corrective steps that have

been taken and the results achieved, (4)

the corrective steps that will be taken to

avoid further violations, and (5) the date

when full compliance will be achieved.

This response shall also be addressed to

the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The Licensee may request a hearing

within 30 days of the date of this Order.

Where good cause is shown,

consideration will be given to extending

the time to request a hearing. A request

for extension of time must be made in

writing to the Director, Office of

Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555,

and include a statement of good cause

for the extension. A request for a

hearing should be clearly marked as a

‘‘Request for an Enforcement Hearing’’

and shall be submitted to the Secretary,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications

Staff, Washington, DC 20555. Copies

also shall be sent to the Director, Office

of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555, to

the Assistant General Counsel for

Materials Litigation and Enforcement at

the same address, and to the Regional

Administrator, NRC Region II, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 61

Forsyth St., SW, Suite 23T85, Atlanta,

GA 30303.

If a hearing is requested, the

Commission will issue an Order

designating the time and place of the

hearing. If the Licensee fails to request

a hearing within 30 days of the date of

this Order (or if written approval of an

extension of time in which to request a

hearing has not been granted), the

provisions of this Order shall be

effective without further proceedings. If

payment has not been made by that

time, the matter may be referred to the

Attorney General for collection.

In the event the Licensee requests a

hearing as provided above, the issues to

be considered at such hearing shall be:

(a) Whether the Licensee was in

violation of the Commission’s

requirements as set forth in Part I of the

Notice referenced in Section II above,

and

(b) Whether, on the basis of such

violation, this Order should be

sustained.

Dated this 29th day of September 2000.

R. William Borchardt,

Director, Office of Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 00–26009 Filed 10–10–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

Consideration of License Amendment

Request for the Nuclear Fuels

Services, Inc., and Opportunity for

Hearing

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of availability of

Environmental Assessment and Finding

of No Significant Impact and

Opportunity to Request a Hearing on

Amendment of Materials License SNM–

124, Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission is considering the

amendment of Special Nuclear Material

License SNM–124 at the Nuclear Fuel

Services, Inc. facility located in Erwin,

TN.

Environmental Assessment

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Background

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC) staff has evaluated the

environmental impacts of the

amendment request from Nuclear Fuel

Services, Inc. (NFS) to change liquid

effluent action levels and reporting

commitments in Materials License

SNM–124 in accordance with 10 CFR

20.1302. This Environmental

Assessment (EA) has been prepared

pursuant to the Council on

Environmental Quality (CEQ)

regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500–1508)

and NRC regulations (10 CFR Part 51)

which implement the requirements of

the National Environmental Policy Act

(NEPA) of 1969. The purpose of this

document is to assess the environmental

consequences of the proposed license

amendment.

The NFS facility in Erwin, TN is

authorized under SNM–124 to possess

nuclear materials for the fabrication and

assembly of nuclear fuel components.

The facility produces nuclear fuel for

the U.S. Naval Reactor Program. The

principle operations include: (1) the

processing of highly enriched uranium

[greater than 90 weight percent 235U]

into a classified fuel product; and (2) the

processing of scrap materials containing

highly enriched uranium (HEU) to

recover uranium.

1.2 Review Scope

In accordance with 10 CFR Part 51,

this EA serves to (1) present information

and analysis for determining whether to

issue a Finding of No Significant Impact

(FONSI) or to prepare an Environmental

Impact Statement (EIS); (2) fulfill the

NRC’s compliance with the National

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) when

no EIS is necessary; and (3) facilitate

preparation of an EIS if one is necessary.

Should the NRC issue a FONSI, no EIS

would be prepared and the license

amendment would be granted.

1.3 Proposed Action

The proposed action is to amend NRC

Materials License SNM–124 to change

liquid effluent action levels and

reporting commitments in accordance

with 10 CFR 20.1302. Currently, NFS

uses 20.1302(b)(2) to demonstrate

compliance. NFS proposes to use

20.1302(b)(1) to demonstrate

compliance.

1.4 Need for Proposed Action

Licensees are required to comply with

the annual dose limits in 10 CFR

20.1301. The applicable dose limit in

20.1301(a)(1) states that the licensee

shall conduct operations so that the

total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) to

individual members of the public from

the license operation does not exceed

100 mrem in a year, exclusive of dose

contribution from background radiation,

from medical procedures, or from the

licensee’s disposal of radioactive

material into sanitary sewerage. In

accordance with 10 CFR 20.1302,

compliance can be demonstrated by

either of two ways: (1) the licensee can

demonstrate, by measurement or

calculation, that the TEDE to the

individual likely to receive the highest

dose from the licensed operation does

not exceed the annual dose limit; or (2)

the licensee may show that the annual

average concentrations of radioactive

material released in the gaseous and

liquid effluents at the boundary of the

restricted area do not exceed values

specified in Table 2, ‘‘Effluent

Concentrations,’’ of Appendix B to 10

CFR Part 20 in conjunction with other

measurements.

Amending the NFS license to allow

effluent discharge compliance to be

reported as dose provides the licensee

with the flexibility to continue

operating the Waste Water Treatment

Facility (WWTF) in case a sample is

suspect and needs to be re-analyzed.

NFS has previously demonstrated

compliance with the annual dose limit

in 10 CFR 20.1301 for releases to the

Nolichucky River from the WWTF by

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 11, 2000 / Notices 60473

meeting the concentration values in 10

CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table 2. If a

sample was suspected of exceeding the

values in 10 CFR Part 20, the WWTF

shut down until the sample was reanalyzed. NFS proposes to ensure

compliance by demonstrating, through

calculation, that the annual TEDE from

liquid effluents will remain below 10

mrem to the maximally exposed off-site

receptor.

1.5 Alternatives

The alternatives available to the NRC

are:

Alternative 1—Deny the amendment

request (no action alternative); or

Alternative 2—Approve the license

amendment request as submitted.

2.0 Affected Environment

The affected environment for

Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 would

be the NFS site, the Nolichucky River,

and the near downstream area of the

river. A full description of the affected

area and its characteristics is given in

the 1999 Environmental Assessment for

the Renewal of the NRC license for NFS.

3.0 Effluent Releases and Monitoring

Effluents from the NFS facility

include discharges of sanitary wastes to

the City of Erwin sanitary sewer,

effluents to air, and liquid effluents to

Banner Spring Branch, Martin Creek,

and the Nolichucky River. A full

description of the NFS Environmental

Monitoring Program is given in the 1999

Environmental Assessment for Renewal.

Alternative 1

The WWTF treats liquid effluents

generated by the various site operations,

including fuel production, low-enriched

and high-enriched uranium recovery,

mixed-waste treatment, laboratory

operations, laundry, building

decommissioning, and site remediation.

These liquid waste streams are pH

adjusted and ammonia is removed by a

stripping tower or by breakpoint

chlorination, as appropriate. Waste

water is treated by lime precipitation to

remove fluoride, uranium, and other

metals. After the lime is precipitated,

the waste water is filtered, neutralized,

and discharged into the Nolichucky

River through outfall 001, under the

National Pollutant Discharge

Elimination System (NPDES) permit.

The precipitate is dewatered in a filter

press, and the filter press cake is

packaged for off-site disposal at a lowlevel waste disposal facility.

During operation of the WWTF, each

batch is analyzed for gross alpha and

gross beta radioactivity prior to

discharge. Also, a monthly composite

sample is analyzed for isotopes of

uranium. The monthly composite is

analyzed for other radionuclides if

materials, in addition to uranium, are

suspected to be present in process waste

water at levels exceeding 10% of the

concentration values in Appendix B,

Table 2, Column 2, 10 CFR Part 20. The

chemical parameters prescribed in the

State of Tennessee NPDES permit are

also analyzed at the frequency specified

in the permit. Samples of the treated

waste water are collected from the final

neutralization or storage tank prior to

discharge.

If an action level is exceeded, the

following actions occur: (1) The

Environmental Protection Function

Manager and the responsible process

engineering control personnel are

notified, (2) an investigation is

undertaken to identify the cause of the

exceedance, and (3) appropriate

corrective actions are initiated to reduce

observed levels that are above the action

levels, and to minimize the likelihood of

a recurrence. No discharge is authorized

by the NFS Environmental Protection

Function Manager that would result in

a 12 month average concentration

exceeding the applicable level specified

in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table

2, Column 2. Corrective actions are

documented. If necessary, the

Environmental Protection Function

manager may order processing activities

in an area to be halted until appropriate

corrective actions are implemented.

Alternative 2

Each calender quarter, WWTF liquid

effluent data will be compiled and used

to calculate the maximum concentration

of radioactive materials at the location

of the maximally exposed off-site

receptor and the dose (TEDE) to the

maximally exposed off-site receptor due

to discharge of WWTF liquid effluents.

This quarterly assessment will typically

be completed within 60 days of

receiving all sample results necessary to

perform the assessment. If any sample

results are pending, a preliminary

assessment may be performed if

necessary to meet the semi-annual

reporting condition.

If the resulting TEDE to the maximally

exposed off-site receptor exceeds 2.5

mrem/quarter, appropriate corrective

action will be identified and

implemented to reduce future dose

levels. Each calender quarter, the dose

for the four previous (consecutive)

quarters will be calculated. If the

calculated TEDE to any member of the

public for this four quarter period

exceeds the 10 mrem per year action

level, NFS will implement corrective

actions and the NRC will be notified of

the event, in writing, within 30 days.

Assessment of the maximum

concentration and TEDE to the

maximally exposed off-site receptor will

be performed using: (1) National

Council on Radiation Protection and

Measurements (NCRP) Report No. 123,

‘‘Screening Models for Releases of

Radionuclides to Atmosphere, Surface

Water, and Ground,’’ or (2) pathway

analysis models that consider all

exposure pathways and accurately

reflect site conditions and simulate

exposure to members of the public. Sitespecific characteristics of the surface

waters receiving liquid effluents will be

accurately assessed. NFS will follow

written procedures to perform these

calculations. Parameter values will be

based on information contained in

NCRP Report No. 123, data collected

during the assessment period, publicly

available information (e.g., stream flow

data compiled by the U.S. Geological

Survey), previous monitoring history, or

the professional judgement of the NFS

Environmental Protection Function

Manager.

In accordance with 10 CFR 70.59,

NFS is required to submit a semi-annual

effluent report. If the semi-annual

average activity concentration for

WWTF effluents exceed concentrations

listed in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B,

Table 2, Column 2, results of an

assessment of the TEDE to the

maximally exposed off-site receptor

from these effluents will be included in

the semi-annual effluent report to the

NRC.

4.0 Environmental Impacts of

Proposed Action and Alternatives

4.1 Public Health

Alternative 1

The impacts of normal operation are

provided in the 1999 Environmental

Assessment for the Renewal of the NRC

license for NFS. The analysis assumes

that an individual along the Nolichucky

River and the surrounding population

out to a distance of 50 miles uses this

potentially contaminated water. Liquidrelease exposure pathways include

ingestion of drinking water, fish, and

irrigated crops and external exposure

during recreational activities. The total

effective dose estimate (TEDE) for the

maximally exposed individual was

estimated as 0.10 mrem/yr from liquid

releases.

Alternative 2

NFS is proposing a maximum TEDE

of 10 mrem/yr for liquid releases. This

is 10% of the 10 CFR Part 20 limit of

100 mrem/yr from all pathways. NFS’

60474 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 11, 2000 / Notices

commitment to a 10 mrem action level

will provide reasonable assurance that

the facility will continue to operate

within the regulatory limits.

4.2 Occupational Health

Alternative 1 and Alternative 2

The dose to the workers at the NFS

site has been analyzed in the Safety

Evaluation Report for the Renewal,

dated July 2, 1999. This dose will not

increase as a result of Alternative 2

because there will be no changes to the

treatment process. NFS is committed to

keeping doses as low as reasonable

achievable (ALARA) by maintaining a

radiation protection program that

minimizes radiation exposures and

releases of radioactive material to the

environment.

4.3 Water Resources and Biota

Alternative 1 and Alternative 2

Liquid effluents are released directly

or indirectly into the Nolichucky River.

Small creeks receiving portions of the

liquid discharge, Banner Spring Branch

and Martin Creek, are not used as a

drinking water supply for area residents.

The nearest drinking water intake on the

Nolichucky River is 8 miles downstream

from the NFS outfall (NFS, 1996). Since

the amount of radioactivity entering

Banner Spring Branch, Martin Creek

and the Nolichucky River does not

exceed the allowable limits in 10 CFR

Part 20 for either alternative, there will

be no significant impact on water

quality or biota. NFS will continue to

meet the requirements for effluent

discharge in their NPDES permit.

4.4 Geology, Soils, Air Quality,

Demography, Cultural and Historic

Resources

Alternative 1 and Alternative 2

The NRC staff has determined that the

neither alternative will impact geology,

soils, air quality, demography, or

cultural or historic resources at or near

the NFS site. A full description of these

parameters is given in the 1999

Environmental Assessment for Renewal.

4.5 Alternatives

The action that the NRC is

considering is approval of an

amendment request to a Materials

license issued pursuant to 10 CFR Part

70. The proposed action is to amend

NRC Materials License SNM–124 to

change liquid effluent action levels and

reporting commitments in accordance

with 10 CFR 20.1302. The alternatives

available to the NRC are:

1. Deny the amendment request; or

2. Approve the license amendment

request as submitted.

Based on its review, the NRC staff has

concluded that the environmental

impacts associated with the proposed

action are minimal. Although the TEDE

might increase from 0.010 mrem to 10

mrem for the liquid release pathway,

there is reasonable assurance that the 10

CFR 20.1301 dose limit of 100 mrem/yr

from all pathways will not be exceeded.

The staff considers that Alternative 2 is

the appropriate alternative for selection

and recommends approval of the license

amendment.

5.0 Agencies and Persons Contacted

The NRC contacted a representative

from the State of Tennessee, Department

of Health in correspondence dated

August 10, 2000. The State had no

comments.

6.0 References

Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc., December,

1999, ‘‘Environmental Report for Renewal of

Special Nuclear Material License No. SNM–

124.’’

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC), January, 1999, ‘‘Environmental

Assessment for Renewal of Special Nuclear

Material License SNM–124.’’

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC), July 2, 1999, ‘‘Safety Evaluation

Report for the Renewal of Special Nuclear

Material License SNM–124 for Nuclear Fuel

Services, Inc.’’

7.0 Conclusions

Based on an evaluation of the

environmental impacts of the

amendment request, the NRC has

determined that the proper action is to

issue a FONSI in the Federal Register.

The NRC staff considered the

environmental consequences of

amending NRC Materials License SNM–

124 to change liquid effluent action

levels and reporting commitments in

accordance with 10 CFR 20.1302, and

have determined that the approval of

this request will have no significant

effect on public health and safety or the

environment.

Finding of No Significant Impact

The Commission has prepared an

Environmental Assessment related to

the amendment of Special Nuclear

Material License SNM–124. On the basis

of the assessment, the Commission has

concluded that environmental impacts

associated with the proposed action

would not be significant and do not

warrant the preparation of an

Environmental Impact Statement.

Accordingly, the Commission is making

a Finding of No Significant Impact.

The Environmental Assessment and

the documents related to this proposed

action are available for public

inspection and copying at the

Commission’s Public Document Room

at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,

Maryland between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15

p.m. on federal workdays.

Opportunity for a Hearing

Based on the Environmental

Assessment and Finding of No

Significant Impact, and a staff safety

evaluation to be completed, NRC is

preparing to amend License SNM–124.

The NRC hereby provides that this is a

proceeding on an application for

amendment of a license falling within

the scope of Subpart L, ‘‘Informal

Hearing Procedures for Adjudication in

Materials Licensing Proceedings,’’ of

NRC’s rules and practice for domestic

licensing proceedings in 10 CFR Part 2.

Pursuant to Section 2.1205(a), any

person whose interest may be affected

by this proceeding may file a request for

a hearing in accordance with Section

2.1205(d). A request for a hearing must

be filed within thirty (30) days of the

date of publication of this Federal

Register notice.

A request for hearing or petition for

leave to intervene must be filed with the

Secretary of the Commission, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission either:

1. By delivery to the Rulemakings and

Adjudications Staff of the Secretary at

One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville

Pike, Rockville, MD 20852–2738; or

2. By mail or telegram addressed to

the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555–

0001. Attention: Rulemakings and

Adjudications Staff.

In addition to meeting other

applicable requirements of 10 CFR Part

2 of the NRC’s regulations, a request for

a hearing filed by a person other than

an applicant must describe in detail:

1. The interest of the requester in the

proceeding;

2. How that interest may be affected

by the results of the proceeding,

including the reasons why the requestor

should be permitted a hearing, with

particular reference to the factors set out

in Section 2.1205(h).

3. The requester’s areas of concern

about the licensing activity that is the

subject matter of the proceeding; and

4. The circumstances establishing that

the request for a hearing is timely in

accordance with Section 2.1205(d).

In accordance with 10 CFR Section

2.1205(f), each request for a hearing

must also be served, by delivering it

personally or by mail to:

1. The applicant, Nuclear Fuel

Services ; and

2. The NRC staff, by delivering it to

the Executive Director for Operations,

One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville

Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, or by mail,

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 11, 2000 / Notices 60475

addressed to the Executive Director for

Operations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555.

The NRC contact for this licensing

action is Mary Adams. Ms. Adams may

be contacted at (301) 415–7249 or by email at mta@nrc.gov for more

information about this licensing action.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 4th day

of October, 2000.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Philip Ting,

Chief, Fuel Cycle Licensing Branch, Division

of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office

of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.

[FR Doc. 00–26010 Filed 10–10–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste

Procedures for Meetings

Background

This notice describes procedures to be

followed with respect to meetings

conducted pursuant to the Federal

Advisory Committee Act by the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s)

Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste

(ACNW). These procedures are set forth

so that they may be incorporated by

reference in future notices for

individual meetings.

The ACNW advises the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission on nuclear

waste disposal issues. This includes

facilities covered under 10 CFR Parts 61

and the proposed Part 63 and other

applicable regulations and legislative

mandates, such as the Nuclear Waste

Policy Act, the Low-Level Radioactive

Waste Policy Act and amendments, and

the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation

Control Act, as amended. The

Committee’s reports become a part of

the public record.

The ACNW meetings are normally

open to the public and provide

opportunities for oral or written

statements from members of the public

to be considered as part of the

Committee’s information gathering

process. The meetings are not

adjudicatory hearings such as those

conducted by the NRC’s Atomic Safety

and Licensing Board Panel as part of the

Commission’s licensing process. ACNW

meetings are conducted in accordance

with the Federal Advisory Committee

Act.

General Rules Regarding ACNW

Meetings

An agenda is published in the Federal

Register for each full Committee

meeting and is available on the Internet

at http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW and

is updated as changes are made. During

an ACNW meeting there may be a need

to make changes to the agenda to

facilitate the conduct of the meeting.

The Chairman of the Committee is

empowered to conduct the meeting in a

manner that, in his/her judgment, will

facilitate the orderly conduct of

business, including making provisions

to continue the discussion of matters

not completed on the scheduled day

during another meeting. Persons

planning to attend the meeting may

contact the Designated Federal Official

specified in the individual Federal

Register Notice prior to the meeting to

be advised of any changes to the agenda

that may have occurred. This individual

can be contacted between 7:30 a.m. and

4:15 p.m., Eastern Time.

The following requirements shall

apply to public participation in ACNW

meetings:

(a) Persons wishing to submit written

comments regarding the agenda items

may do so by sending a readily

reproducible copy addressed to the

Designated Federal Official specified in

the Federal Register Notice for the

individual meeting in care of the

Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555. Comments

should be in the possession of the

Designated Federal Official at least five

days prior to the meeting to allow time

for reproduction and distribution.

Comments should be limited to topics

being considered by the Committee.

Written comments may also be

submitted by providing a readily

reproducible copy to the Designated

Federal Official at the beginning of the

meeting.

(b) Persons desiring to make oral

statements at the meeting should make

a request to do so to the Designated

Federal Official. If possible, the request

should be made five days before the

meeting, identifying the topics to be

discussed and the amount of time

needed for presentation so that orderly

arrangements can be made. The

Committee will hear oral statements on

topics being reviewed at an appropriate

time during the meeting as scheduled by

the Chairman.

(c) In addition to the ACRS/ACNW

Internet web site, information regarding

topics to be discussed, changes to the

agenda, whether the meeting has been

canceled or rescheduled and the time

allotted to present oral statements can

be obtained by contacting the

Designated Federal Official between

7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m., Eastern Time.

(d) During the ACNW meeting

presentations and discussions,

questions may be asked only by ACNW

members, Committee consultants, NRC

staff, and the ACNW staff.

(e) The use of still, motion picture,

and television cameras will be

permitted at the discretion of the

Chairman and subject to the condition

that the physical installation and

presence of such equipment will not

interfere with the conduct of the

meeting. The Designated Federal

Official will have to be notified prior to

the meeting and will authorize the

installation or use of such equipment

after consultation with the Chairman.

The use of such equipment will be

restricted as is necessary to protect

proprietary or privileged information

that may be in documents, folders, etc.,

in the meeting room. Electronic

recordings will be permitted only

during those portions of the meeting

that are open to the public.

(f) A transcript is kept for certain open

portions of the meeting and will be

made available to the public through the

NRC’s Public Document Room, One

White Flint North, Room O–1F21, 11555

Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852–

2738, or from the Publicly Available

Records (PARS) component of NRC’s

document system (ADAMS) which is

accessible from the NRC Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/

index.html (the Public Electronic

Reading Room). A copy of the certified

minutes of the meeting will be available

at the same location on or before three

months following the meeting. Copies

may be obtained from the PDR upon

payment of appropriate reproduction

charges. ACNW meeting agenda,

meeting transcripts, and letter reports

are available for downloading or

viewing on the Internet at http://

www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

(g) Videoteleconferencing service is

available for observing open sessions of

some ACNW meetings. Those wishing

to use this service for observing ACNW

meetings should contact Mr. Theron

Brown, ACNW Audio Visual

Technician, (301–415–8066) between

7:30 a.m. and 3:45 p.m., Eastern Time at

least 10 days before the meeting to

ensure the availability of this service.

Individuals or organizations requesting

this service will be responsible for

telephone line charges and for providing

the equipment and facilities that they

use to establish the

videoteleconferencing link. The

availability of videoteleconferencing

services is not guaranteed.

ACNW Working Group Meetings

ACNW Working Group meetings will

also be conducted in accordance with

these procedures, as appropriate. When