alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
steam_record - Re: Questionaire for Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent 

Guidelines:Extension Request 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Hoang, Boi V" <HoangBV@gru.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Hoang, Boi V" <HoangBV@gru.com> 

Date: 07/01/2010 12:10PM 

cc: "Klemans, Robert W" <KLEMANSRW@gru.com>, "Regan, Edward J" <REGANEJ@gru.com> 

Subject: Questionaire for Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines:Extension Request

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Hoang, Boi V" <HoangBV@gru.com>

Date: 7/2/2010 7:52 PM

Subject: Re: Questionaire for Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines:Extension Request

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2E4395DO... 4/25/2011
Dear Ms. Alicea,

The City of Gainesville, Gainesville Regional Utilities, has studied the USEPA’s Questionnaire for the Steam 

Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines sent to our power generating stations, JR Kelly (Plant ID 4211) 

and Deerhaven (Plant ID 2623). Due to the volume of questions requiring extensive data collection, calculations, 

competing projects and timelines, we request an extension of 180 days. Please advise if this request is 

approved.

Thank you in advance for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Boi Hoang

Utility Design Engineer

Strategic Planning

Gainesville Regional Utilities (GRU) 

P.O. Box 147117 

A136

Gainesville, FL 32614-7117 

Phone: 352-393-1304

Fax: 352-334-3151

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2E4395DO... 4/25/2011
CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Lingo Media Corporation (the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Date: May 4, 2010
 
 /s/ Michael KraftMichael Kraft

President & Chief Executive Officer
 
 This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
From: John Mietus [mailto:john@mietuslaw.com]

Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 7:14 PM

To: Finamore, Robert (OST) Subject: FW: POLL: Aeromexico Mexico City

- Orlando (scheduled, combination)

Bob, I’ve completed the poll of the US carriers shown, and there are no objections to the attached
application.

Best regards, John

From: John Mietus

Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 3:27 PM

To: 'carl.nelson@aa.com'; 'robert.wirick@aa.com'; 'sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com'; 'jeff.morgan@delta.com'; 'bkeiner@crowell.com'; 'lhalloway@crowell.com'; 'gmurphy@crowell.com'; 'dan.weiss@united.com'; 'jonathan.linde@ united.com'; 'steve.morrissey@united.com'; 'howard.kass@usairways.com'; 'benjamin.slocum@usairways.com'; 'nssparks@fedex.com'; 'gbleopard@fedex.com'; 'jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com'; 'jcanny@amerijet.com'; 'anita.mosner@hklaw.com'; 'pmurphy@ggh

- airlaw.co m'; 'sharfst@usa3000airlines.com';

'slachter@lachter

- clements.com'; 'efaberman@wrf.com'; 'bob.kneisley@wnco.com'; 'jyoung@yklaw.com'; 'dkirstein@yklaw.com'; 'msinick@ssd.com'; 'agoerlich@ggh

- airlaw.com'; 'urskr@state.gov'; 'john.allen@faa.gov'; 'robert.fin amore@dot.gov'; 'info@airlineinfo.com' Subject: POLL: Aeromexico Mexico City

- Orlando (scheduled, combination)

Dear all, attached please find an Aeromexico exemption application for Mexico City

- Orlando scheduled,
combination authority. A prompt response w ith your carrier's position on the application will be greatly
appreciated.

Best regards, John

POLL LIST:
carl.nelson, robert.wirick@aa.com
sascha.vanderbellen, jeff .morgan@delta.com
bkeiner, lhalloway, gmurphy@crowell.com for United
dan.weiss, jonathan.linde, steve.morrissey@united.com
howard.kass, benjamin.slocum@usairways.com nssparks, gbleopard@fedex.com
jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com + jcanny@amerijet.com
anita.mosner@hklaw.com for UPS
pmurphy@ggh

- airlaw.com for USA 3000
sharfst@usa3000airlines.com
slachter@lachter

- clements.com for Astar
efaberman@wrf.com for Frontier and Airtran

bob.k neisley@wnco.com for AirTran
jyoung, dkirstein@yklaw.com for Spirit
msinick@ssd.com for Alaska agoerlich@ggh

- airlaw.com for R yan Int'l

_________________________ John MietusLaw Office of John Mietus, LLC 6701 Democracy Blvd Ste 300 Bethesda, MD 20817

- 7500 (202) 747

- 5212 (240) 396

- 5362 fax john@mietuslaw.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this e

- mail and any attachments may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected
from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not review, use, disclose, distribute or copy the information it contains; destroy this e

- mail and notify the sender by reply e

- mail or an e

- mail to admin@mietuslaw.com

. Thanks.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5525 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5525

To suspend temporarily the duty on forged steel crankshafts other than 
for vehicles of chapter 87, each measuring 1868 millimeters or more in 
                                length.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on forged steel crankshafts other than 
for vehicles of chapter 87, each measuring 1868 millimeters or more in 
                                length.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORGED STEEL CRANKSHAFTS OTHER THAN FOR VEHICLES OF CHAPTER 
              87, EACH MEASURING 1868 MILLIMETERS OR MORE IN LENGTH.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Forged steel        Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          crankshafts other                                                 12/31/2015
                          than for vehicles
                          of chapter 87,
                          each measuring
                          1868 mm or more
                          in length and
                          weighing 453 kg
                          or more, with a
                          stroke radius of
                          95 mm or more
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8483.10.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 26013.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is misdemeanor theft; the punishment, 30 days in jail.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment is affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2016

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2016

151134(56)

TAMIKA HARRELL,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 151134

v COA: 318744

Wayne CC: 12-003939-NF

TITAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 15, 

2016 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. </LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                         275,276
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,126
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,831)
<INVENTORY>                                    166,860
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               775,806
<PP&E>                                         241,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                (132,874)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 931,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          293,633
<BONDS>                                        147,649
<COMMON>                                       110,009
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     361,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   931,061
<SALES>                                        305,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               305,010
<CGS>                                          273,976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  273,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,859
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,175
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,481
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,165
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,165
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        








</TABLE>
#### STATE BOARD OF INSURANCE COMMISSIONERS OF TEXAS, Petitioner, v. Mrs. Glenn FULTON et al., Respondents.

No. A-2755.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 1, 1950.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1950.

For former opinion see 229 S.W.2d 652.

Price Daniel, Atty. Gen., Texas, William S. Lott, Asst. Atty. Gen., Joe H. Reynolds, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Moore & Spivey, Bryan, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The application for writ of error is Refused No Reversible Error, but without thereby affirming the holding that the cause was moot
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Norman McFarlane, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Genesee County Court, Morton, J.—criminal possession of controlled substance, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cytation Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard Fisher, Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard
Fisher                            Richard
FisherChairman of the Board and Chief Financial Officer

November 17, 2005
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40911

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

BLAIR FREDERICK BRADLEY ,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 772

Filed: November 27, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS I S AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sev enth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bonneville County. Hon. Joel E. Tingey , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of eight years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years , for felony driving under the influence

, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellat e Public Defender; Sally J. Cooley, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appell ant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before LANSING, Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Blair Frederick Bradley was convicted of felony driving under the influence , Idaho Code

§§ 18

- 8004, 18

- 8005(6), 18

- 8008. The district court sentenced Bradley to a unified term of eight

years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years , suspended the sentence, and placed

him on probation. Bradley appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well establ ished and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.2 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 71 0 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Bradley ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elizabeth Arden, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Scott Beattie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Stephen J. Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge: 

(i)**      **The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii)**      **The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
#### Rollie CARROLL, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 10, 1954.

William Lewis, W. J. Weaver, Lewis & Weaver, London, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., William F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of unlawfully trafficking in alcoholic beverages in local option territory, and his punishment was fixed at 60 days in jail and a $100 fine.

Finding no error in the record, the appeal is denied and the judgment is affirmed.
Order entered September 12, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00699-CV

BOBBY JOE EVENS, Appellant

V.

VEDA MICHELLE EVENS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-24977

ORDER

In light of the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS appellee’s motion for proper 

name usage.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR THE

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

JASON LEE VAN DYKE, §

§

Plaintiff, §

v. § Case No. 1:20-MC-657-LY

§ 

THOMAS CHRISTOPHER §

RETZLAFF, a/k/a DEAN §

ANDERSON, d/b/a BV FILES, VIA §

FILES, L.L.C., and VIAVIEW §

FILES, §

§

Defendant. §

UNITED STATES’ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on June 23, 2020, a true copy of the United States’ Amended Motion to 

Quash and Transfer (Dkt. 5) with attachments was served on all counsel of record by way of the 

Court’s CM/ECF system and that service was made by certified mail to the pro se litigant:

James McGibney

4305 Ridgebend Dr.

Round Rock, TX 78665

I further certify that on July 1, 2020, a true copy of the United States’ Amended Motion to 

Quash and Transfer, with attachments, was served by certified mail (FedEx) and email to:

Thomas C. Retzlaff

2402 E. Esplanade Ln.

PO Box 46424

Phoenix, AZ 85063-6424

Jeffrey L. Dorrell

14201 Memorial Drive

Houston, Texas 77079

jdorrell@hanszenlaporte.com

Jason Lee Van Dyke

PO Box 2618

Decatur, TX 76234 

All litigants were in receipt of the motion on the day it was filed.

Case 1:20-mc-00657-LY-ML Document 22 Filed 07/01/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

By: /s/ Kristina S. Baehr

Kristina S. Baehr

Assistant United States Attorney

Bar No. _ 24080780 _____________

903 San Jacinto, Suite 334

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 916-5858 (phone)

(512) 916-5854 (fax)

Kristina.baehr@usdoj.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on July 1, 2020, a true copy of this Certificate of Service was served on all 

counsel of record by way of the Court’s CM/ECF system and that service was made by certified 

mail to:

James McGibney

4305 Ridgebend Dr.

Round Rock, TX 78665

Jason Lee Van Dyke

PO Box 2618

Decatur, TX 76234

Thomas C. Retzlaff

2402 E. Esplanade Ln.

PO Box 46424

Phoenix, AZ 85063-6424

Jeffrey L. Dorrell

14201 Memorial Drive

Houston, Texas 77079

jdorrell@hanszenlaporte.com 

By: /s/ Kristina S. Baehr

Kristina S. Baehr

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 1:20-mc-00657-LY-ML Document 22 Filed 07/01/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.30

                                [STORAGETEK LOGO]


September 30, 2002



PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

Mr. Pierre I. Cousin
2439 Targhee Point
Lafayette, CO 80026

Dear Mr. Cousin:

As you know the Letter Agreement we entered into with you regarding your
employment arrangement with Storage Technology Corporation (the "Company"),
dated July 31, 2001, will terminate effective August 31, 2002, unless extended
by the Company pursuant to Section 4 of the Letter Agreement.

This letter shall serve as written confirmation that the Company hereby extends
this Letter Agreement to December 1, 2002 or an earlier date as mutually agreed
by you and the Company. This letter supersedes the previous letter of extension
dated August 28, 2002.


STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION



By:
         -------------------------------
         Roger Gaston

Title:   Corporate Vice President/Human Resources



By:
         -------------------------------
         Pierre I. Cousin

Title:   Vice President/General Manager, Storage Area Networks
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Luqman Khan, Chief Financial Officer of Amarc Resources Ltd.
(the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

(i)     the Annual
Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 (the
"Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)     the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
    July 28, 2016By:
    Luqman KhanTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer


This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---