alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5643 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Imidan Technical. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. GOSAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Imidan Technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMIDAN TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2- 

(dimethoxyphosphinothioylsulfanylmethyl)isoindole1,3-dione (Imidan Technical) (CAS No. 732–11– 

6) (provided for in subheading 2930.90.10) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5643 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5138 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5138

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain plastic lamp-
                            holder housings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain plastic lamp-
                            holder housings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASTIC LAMP-HOLDER HOUSINGS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.29 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain plastic lamp-holder 
housings) is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2724 

To exclude from gross income compensation provided for victims of the 

March 29, 2013, pipeline oil spill in Mayflower, Arkansas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2013 

Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas (for himself, Mr. WOMACK, Mr. CRAWFORD, and 

Mr. COTTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To exclude from gross income compensation provided for 

victims of the March 29, 2013, pipeline oil spill in 

Mayflower, Arkansas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mayflower Oil Spill 

5 Tax Relief Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MAYFLOWER, ARKANSAS OIL SPILL COMPENSATION 

7 EXCLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME. 

8 For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 

9 1986— 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2724 IH

1 (1) the March 29, 2013, pipeline rupture and 

2 oil spill in Mayflower, Arkansas, shall be treated as 

3 a qualified disaster under section 139(c) of such 

4 Code, and 

5 (2) any compensation provided to or for the 

6 benefit of a victim of such disaster shall be treated 

7 as a qualified disaster relief payment under section 

8 139(b) of such Code. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5581 

To suspend temporarily the duty on chlorophyllin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on chlorophyllin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHLOROPHYLLIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Chlorophyllin (CAS No. 

11006–34–1) (provided for in 

subheading 3203.00.80) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5581 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Henry Bowman, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Albert Williams, J.), rendered on June 17, 1988, convicting defendant of attempted burglary in the third degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of *Wz*to 3 years, is unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that court and by submitting such application to the clerk of that court or to a Justice of the *224Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro and Milonas, JJ.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-057-AD

Costs:

Labor per airplane (3 work hours x $85/hour) $ 255

Parts per airplane $ + N/A

Cost per airplane $ 255

Number of U.S.-registered airplanes 

x

 0

Total fleet cost $0

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.7 (BANK OF AMERICA LOGO) Bank of America
475 CrossPoint Parkway
PO Box 9000
Getzville, NY 14068-9000
 Compliance Certificate Pursuant
to the terms of the Servicing Agreement, the undersigned
officer certifies to the following:  Each officer has reviewed the activities and performance of the
Seller/Servicer during the preceding calendar year and to the
best of each officers knowledge, based on such review, the
Seller/Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement for the year ending 2003. Certified By:
    
    /s/ Cynthia A. MechCynthia A. MechVice President
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.53    
  


LIBERATE TECHNOLOGIES 1999 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN  


NOTICE OF STOCK OPTION GRANT  


        You have been granted the following option to purchase Common Stock of Liberate Technologies (the "Company"): 



	Name of Optionee:	 	«Name»
	
 Total Number of Shares Covered by This Option:	
 	

«TotalShares»
	
Exercise Price Per Share:	
 	

«PricePerShare»
	
Date of Grant:	
 	

«DateGrant»
	
Vesting Commencement Date:	
 	

«VestDay»
	
Vesting Schedule:	
 	

This option shall vest in equal monthly installments over 48 months commencing with the vesting commencement date.
	
Acceleration:	
 	

Fifty percent (50%) of the then-unvested portion of this grant will vest immediately in the event of a Change in Control that results in (i) your termination, (ii) a material reduction in the scope, level, or nature of your responsibilities,
 or (iii) a reduction in your title. "Change in Control" is defined as (i) a proposed sale, transfer, or disposition of all or substantially all of the Company's assets, or (ii) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the
Company with or into another entity or any other corporate reorganization, if persons who own less than 50% of the Company immediately prior to such merger, consolidation, or other reorganization own immediately after such merger, consolidation, or
other reorganization 50% or more of the voting power of the outstanding securities of each of (i) the continuing or surviving entity and (ii) any direct or indirect parent corporation of such continuing or surviving entity. A transaction
will not constitute a Change in Control if its sole purpose is to change the state of the Company's incorporation or to create a holding company that will be owned in substantially the same proportions by the persons who held the Company's securities
immediately before such transaction.
	
Expiration Date:	
 	

«ExpDate»





        By
your signature and the signature of the Company's representative below, you and the Company agree that this option is granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the
1999 Equity 





 




Incentive Plan (the "Plan") and the Stock Option Agreement, both of which are attached to and made a part of this document. 



	OPTIONEE:	 	LIBERATE TECHNOLOGIES
	

	
 	

By:	
 	


	 	 	 	 	Title: Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




2









QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.53
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                         105,057
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  172,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (11,740)
<INVENTORY>                                    189,186
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               504,911
<PP&E>                                         284,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                (171,298)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 640,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          212,338
<BONDS>                                         57,747
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,780
<OTHER-SE>                                     304,086
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   640,822
<SALES>                                        808,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               808,499
<CGS>                                          677,808
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  677,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                86,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,903
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,867
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,867
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.84


</TABLE>
#### GALLEGOS v. STATE.

No. 25987.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 29, 1952.

*163George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Upon a plea of guilty before the court, appellant was convicted for the unlawful sale of whisky in a dry area and his punishment assessed at thirty days in jail.

This court has no jurisdiction over the instant appeal since the record reflects that no notice of appeal was given and entered of record, as required by Art. 827, C.C.P. Bunn v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 236 S.W.2d 137.

The state’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
NO. 07-03-0231-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

MARCH 15, 2004

______________________________

HENRY F. SMITH AND KRONGTHONG SMITH, APPELLANTS

V.

BRUCE R. MCALISTER AND SHIRLEY MCALISTER, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 411TH DISTRICT COURT OF POLK COUNTY;

NO. 17,388; HONORABLE ROBERT H. TRAPP, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Henry F. Smith and Krongthong Smith filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal

on March 1, 2004.

No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our
-2-

mandate will issue forthwith. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. All costs are assessed to appellants.

 

James T. Campbell

 Justice
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Lingo Media Corporation (the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 30, 2014



|/s/ Michael Kraft                                 |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Michael Kraft
President & Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | 



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Kronos International, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  Report),  I, Dr.  Lawrence A.
Wigdor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.




/s/  Dr. Lawrence A. Wigdor
----------------------------
     Dr. Lawrence A. Wigdor
     Chief Executive Officer

March 26, 2003

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Kronos  International,   Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Kronos
International,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5724 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5724

 To suspend temporarily the duty on on Barium magnesium aluminum oxide 
            for use in the production of fluorescent lamps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2012

Mr. Davis of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on on Barium magnesium aluminum oxide 
            for use in the production of fluorescent lamps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BARIUM MAGNESIUM ALUMINUM OXIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Compound of barium  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          magnesium                                                         12/31/2015
                          aluminate
                          phosphor,
                          activated by
                          europium or
                          manganese, of a
                          kind used as
                          luminophores (CAS
                          Nos. 63774-55-0
                          and 1308-96-9)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3206.50.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40084 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GILBERTO BERMUDEZ-OLIVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-383-1

--------------------- August 24, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Gilberto Bermudez-Olivarez (“Bermudez”) has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Bermudez was sent a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a
response . Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous point for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
From: Steve Thorson [mailto:sthorson@watertownsd.us]

sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 9:50 AM

To: Schlemmer, Kevin (OST)

Cc: Chuck Howell

Subject: Watertown SD

Good afternoon Kevin,

Thank you for the hard work you have been doing for small communities around the nation. Mr. Chuck

Howell of Great Lakes Aviation

contacted me a short time ago to share his plan of action to help with the pilot shortage. His suggestion

to Watertown SD was to have a flight from MSP to DEN with stops in Watertown and Pierre SD. Mr.

Howell also plans to include a flight from DEN to MSP with stops in Pierre and Watertown SD. On

behalf of the City of Watertown, I can assure you we are absolutely on board with this plan of

action. We hope his plan will help improve flight reliability given the current pilot shortage.

Steve Thorson

Mayor

City of Watertown, SD

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

This information contained in this email is privileged

and is therefore only intended for the use of the individual

or entity named above. If the reader of this message is

not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any

dissemination, duplication or distribution of this communication

is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error,

please notify us immediately by telephone. Thank you.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Jeremiah J. Cronin, Jr., et al., Defendants.

Court of General Sessions of County of New York,

June 3,1957.

*174
      *Frank 8. Hogan, District Attorney (Eugene A. Leiman*of1 counsel), for plaintiff.

*Carson De Witt*for defendant.

Thomas Dickehs, J.

The particular defendant, Jeremiah J. Cronin, Jr., brings this motion to dismiss the several indictments as to himself, asserting as the reason lack of prosecution under section 668 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The defendant’s contention for the claim of lack of prosecution, is that the indictments have been pending for 33 months without a trial. Such being the state of the record, defendant Cronin insists that this court is, therefore, required to dismiss these indictments. In support of this contention, he relies heavily *on People*v. *Prosser*(309 N. Y. 353) for authority.

The *Prosser*case lays down the general rule that the burden rests upon the prosecution to see that a defendant receives a speedy trial. Nevertheless, this rule, within the reasoning of the *Prosser*case, holds good only where a defendant is ready at all times to go to trial. Where, however, a defendant consents to a postponement either actually or by implication or seeks an adjournment or is present in court for the purpose of trial but fails to assert his right to an immediate trial, he brings himself outside the strict application of the general rule. (See, also, *People*v. *Knowles,*7 Misc 2d 222, 224.)

These exclusions from the general rule enunciated in the *Prosser*case, hold true in the case at bar.

The People’s affidavit discloses that the defendant Cronin was present on numerous occasions when postponements were had and at such times failed to interpose any objection or insist upon an immediate trial. These instances and other material incidents related in the People’s affidavit, indicate persuasively that defendant’s alleged grievance is without merit.

Accordingly, this motion is denied.