alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q DATED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<CIK> 0000094673
<NAME> STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000


<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                            228,467
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     482,586 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       231,575
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,066,485
<PP&E>                            301,016 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,565,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             655,705
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           10,084
<OTHER-SE>                        872,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,565,925
<SALES>                           301,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  459,669
<CGS>                             196,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     305,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  199,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  6,325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (60,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                      (21,300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (39,538)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (39,538)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.39)

<FN>
<F1> Asset values for the interim period represent net amounts.
</FN>


</TABLE>
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2768 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

that a duty of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue 

is to ensure that Internal Revenue Service employees 

are familiar with and act in accord with certain taxpayer 

rights. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2768 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Bill of 

3 Rights Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DUTY TO ENSURE THAT IRS EMPLOYEES ARE FA5 MILIAR WITH AND ACT IN ACCORD WITH CER6 TAIN TAXPAYER RIGHTS. 

7 Section 7803 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

8 1986 is amended by redesignating paragraph (3) as para9 graph (4) and by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol10 lowing new paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(3) EXECUTION OF DUTIES IN ACCORD WITH

12 TAXPAYER RIGHTS.—In discharging his duties, the 

13 Commissioner shall ensure that employees of the In14 ternal Revenue Service are familiar with and act in 

15 accord with taxpayer rights as afforded by other 

16 provisions of this title, including— 

17 ‘‘(A) the right to be informed, 

18 ‘‘(B) the right to be assisted, 

19 ‘‘(C) the right to be heard, 

20 ‘‘(D) the right to pay no more than the 

21 correct amount of tax, 

22 ‘‘(E) the right of appeal, 

23 ‘‘(F) the right to certainty, 

24 ‘‘(G) the right to privacy, 

25 ‘‘(H) the right to confidentiality, 

26 ‘‘(I) the right to representation, and 
3 

•HR 2768 EH

1 ‘‘(J) the right to a fair and just tax sys2 tem.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2768 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

accord with certain taxpayer rights. Service employees are familiar with and act in nal Revenue is to ensure that Internal Revenue clarify that a duty of the Commissioner of Inter-
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5472 

To suspend temporarily the duty on preformed iodide pellets or powder 

composed of iodides of dysprosium, thallium sodium, holmium, thulium 

and calcium. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on preformed iodide pellets 

or powder composed of iodides of dysprosium, thallium 

sodium, holmium, thulium and calcium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PREFORMED IODIDE PELLETS OR POWDER 

4 COMPOSED OF IODIDES OF DYSPROSIUM, 

5 THALLIUM SODIUM, HOLMIUM, THULIUM 

6 AND CALCIUM. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5472 IH

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Preformed iodide pellets or 

powder composed of 

iodides of dysprosium, 

thallium sodium, holmium, 

thulium and calcium (CAS 

Nos. 7681–82–5, 7790– 

30–9, 15474–63–2, 

13813–41–7, 13813–43–9, 

and 10102–68–8) (provided for in sub-heading 

2827.60.51) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Forwarded by Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/06/2010 08:51 PM

| From:      |

  |Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US                                                               

|

| To:        |

  |Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov                                                               

| Cc:        |

  |Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven Silverman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Susan

Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA                                  |

  

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐>

| Date:      |

|

  |07/29/2010 05:56 PM                                                                       

|

| Subject:   |

||PCA and Ash Grove Meetings                                                                 

Dear Courtney:

I am sure you already understand this but I wanted to go on the record on some of

the things said during the meeting with PCA and Ash Grove.  I do not generally

comment during those meetings because I see them as opportunities for

stakeholders (industry and otherwise) to present their views to OMB.  I get lots

of opportunities to talk to OMB, so I don't want t use up their time.  Several

times in both meeting statements were made that implied I would be in agreement

with what was said.  The fact that I remained silent did not signify agreement.

I will be glad to provide our opinions on  any of the issues raised by PCA or Ash

Grove with you in the next call.

Keith W. Barnett

USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

Mail Code D243‐02

Research Triangle Park, NC  27711

919‐541‐5605

barnett.keith@epa.gov
Exhibit 99.1


                                                                May 14, 2004

Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Trust Company
1251 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020
Attention: Corporate Trust Administration

Wilmington Trust Company
Rodney Square North
1100 North Market Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001
Attention: W. Chris Sponenberg

           Re:  2002 Annual Statement as to Compliance

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     I, Hideyuki Kitamura, certify that:

     (1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of MMCA Auto Owner
Trust 2002-5;

     (2) Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

     (3) Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

     (4) Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in
accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under the servicing agreement; and

     (5) The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.


Sincerely,

MMCA AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST II


By:      /s/ Hideyuki Kitamura
         _____________________________
         Name: Hideyuki Kitamura
         Title: Secretary & Treasurer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-31088

Summary Calendar

In The Matter Of: BAINE SMITH TRANSPORT, INC.,

Debtor.

BAINE SMITH,

Appellant,

VERSUS

BARRY KUPERMAN,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana

(95-CV-25)

May 8, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the United States

District Court for the Western District of Louisiana which affirmed
2

the judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western

District of Louisiana wherein the bankruptcy judge held that a 1989

Corvette was property of the bankruptcy estate under 11 U.S.C. §

541(a). We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts

and relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated

by the United States district judge in his memorandum ruling filed

September 27, 1995, we affirm the judgment filed September 27,

1995, which affirms the earlier judgment of the bankruptcy court.

AFFIRMED.
Order entered Nov e mber 20 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 01423
- CV
IN RE CALIBER HOME L OANS, INC., Relator Original Proceeding from the 95th District Cour t

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 19
- 08719



### O RDER Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s October 31, 2019 order compelling it to participate in non

- binding arbitration. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.1.
A fter signing the order, respondent judge, the Honorable David Evans , ceased to hold office as the presiding judge of the 95th Judicial Distr i ct Court of Dallas County. Under rule 7.2 of the appellate rules, when a judge ceases to hold office and the case is an original proceeding under rule 52 , we must abate the proceeding to allow the successor judge to reconsider the original judge’s decision. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 7.2(b); see also In re Gonzales , 391 S.W.3d 251, 252 (Tex. App.

— Austin 201 2 , orig. proceeding)

. Accord i ngly, we STAY the trial court’s October 31, 2019 order until further order of this Court. W e ABATE this mand amus petition and instruct the successor judge to reconsider the October 31, 2019 order and send to this Court within forty

- five (45) days after appointment, hisor her written ruling o n the applicable motions. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.10(b) (appellate court

may grant any just temporary relief pending its action on mandamus petition).

/s/ ERIN NOWEL L JUSTICE
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 10

- 00913

- CV

Ricardo OLIVARES and Erika Olivares,

Appellants

v.

Alberto Luis BARAJAS and AB Homes, L.L.C.,

Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CVQ001713

- D1

Honorable Jose A

. Lopez , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 27, 2011

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

The parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2). Costs of appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 23, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01211-CV 

PACK PROPERTIES XIV, LLC AND T&T REALTY CORP., Appellants 

V. 

REMINGTON PROSPER, LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 471-04301-2021 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Pedersen, III, and Justice Goldstein 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal from three summary judgment 

orders as the orders did not, individually or in combination, appear to dispose of all 

claims and parties. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) 

(generally, appeal may only be taken from final judgment that disposes of all parties 

and claims). At our request, the parties filed jurisdictional letter briefs. 
 –2– 

After appellants’ letter brief was filed,1

 the trial judge signed an order that 

clarified that parties and claims remain pending. Accordingly, because claims 

remain pending, we lack jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a); Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195. 

221211F.P05 

 

1

 In their letter brief, appellants argued that, based on a “306a letter” that the district clerk had sent them 

following the signing of the summary judgment orders and that informed them that “an appealable order or 

other final order disposing of the case” had been signed, it appeared the trial court intended the summary 

judgment orders to be final. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a(3) (requiring court clerk to immediately give parties 

notice when final judgment or other appealable order is signed); see also Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 205 (when 

no conventional trial on the merits has occurred, order or judgment is final and appealable if it clearly shows 

trial court intended to completely dispose of entire case). Appellants requested that, in the event we were 

uncertain, we abate the appeal for the trial court to clarify its intent. See id. at 206. 

Appellee informed the Court in its letter brief of the clarifying order. 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

PACK PROPERTIES XIV, LLC 

AND T&T REALTY CORP., 

Appellants 

No. 05-22-01211-CV V. 

REMINGTON PROSPER, LLC, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 471st Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 471-04301-

2021. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns, Justices Pedersen, III and 

Goldstein participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

 We ORDER that appellee Remington Prosper, LLC recover its costs, if any, 

of this appeal from appellants Pack Properties XIV, LLC and T&T Realty Corp. 

Judgment entered February 23, 2023.
Order entered October 19 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01570
- CR RANDOLPH GLENN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Jud icial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14
- 76290
- M



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On September 19, 2016, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the appellant’s brief had not been filed. We ADOPT the Oc tober 11, 2016 findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by counsel Lawrence Mitchell who has not abandoned the appeal; (3) counsel’s back surgery resulted in his inability to work for a period of time; and (4) he requests sixty additional days to file the brief.
We ORDER appellant to file his brief no later than December 19, 2016.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

MELODY JOY CANTU and

DR. RODRIGO CANTU, 

Plaintiffs

V.

DR. SANDRA GUERRA and

DIGITAL FORENSICS 

CORPORATION, LLC

Defendants

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO 5:20-CV-00746-JKP (HJB)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL

On this date came on to be considered Plaintiffs’ Motion to Substitute Counsel (Document 

No. 129) and Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Substitute Counsel 

(Doc. No. ______). The Court has carefully considered the motion and response and finds that 

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Substitute Counsel should be DENIED in its entirety. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Substitute Counsel 

(Document No. 129) is DENIED in all respects.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rain Levy Minns is not permitted to withdraw as 

counsel of record for Plaintiffs in this matter at this time.

It is so ORDERED.

Dated: _______________________ _________________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 130-1 Filed 08/22/23 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunair Electronics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May
16, 2005 (the Report), I, John J. Hayes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ John J. HayesJohn J. HayesPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 16, 2005
 - 24 -
Group 4 – Google’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief 

(Civil Case Nos. 6:20-cv-00572-ADA, 6:20-cv-00581-ADA, and 6:20-cv-00582-ADA) 

EXHIBIT #13 

Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 2 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 3 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 4 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 5 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 6 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 7 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 8 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 9 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 10 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 11 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 12 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 13 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 14 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 15 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 16 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 17 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 18 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 19 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 20 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 21 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 22 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 23 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 24 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 25 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 26 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 27 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 28 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 29 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 30 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 31 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 32 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 33 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 34 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 35 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 36 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 37 of 38
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-13 Filed 02/12/21 Page 38 of 38
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00913-CV

Ricardo OLIVARES and Erika Olivares,

Appellants

v.

Alberto Luis BARAJAS and AB Homes, L.L.C.,

Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CVQ001713-D1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 27, 2011

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

The parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). Costs of appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5726 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5726

 To suspend temporarily the duty on Lanthanum phosphate for use in the 
                    production of fluorescent lamps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2012

Mr. Davis of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on Lanthanum phosphate for use in the 
                    production of fluorescent lamps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANTHANUM PHOSPHATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Lanthanum           Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          phosphate                                                         12/31/2015
                          phosphor,
                          activated by
                          cerium and
                          terbium,
                          inorganic used as
                          luminophores (CAS
                          Nos. 13778-59-1,
                          13454-71-2, and
                          13863-48-4 or
                          95823-34-0)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2846.90.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```