alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   Board of Directors The Standard Register Company Dayton, Ohio  We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2007 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.  Based upon our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 6, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.   /S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP   Dayton, Ohio October 31, 2007
Vivek V. Krishnan

Winston & Strawn LLP

35 W. Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60601

Re: Civil Case No. W-20-cv-500-ADA Unification Technologies LLC v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al

Dear Mr. Krishnan,

Our records indicate that you are not admitted to practice in this Court. Western District 

of Texas Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(1) states: 

In General: An attorney who is licensed by the highest court of a state or 

another federal district court, but who is not admitted to practice before this 

court, may represent a party in this court pro hac vice only by permission of 

the judge presiding. Unless excused by the judge presiding, an attorney is 

ordinarily required to apply for admission to the bar of this court.

If you are representing a party, please submit a motion requesting the Court’s permission 

to appear in the above captioned case. If you wish to file an application to be admitted in the 

Western District of Texas, the application forms and the Local Rules for the Western District of 

Texas are available on our website www.txwd.uscourts.gov. If you are an attorney who 

maintains his or her office outside of the Western District of Texas, the judge may require you to 

designate local counsel. (Local Rule AT-2). 

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact our office. 

Sincerely,

Akeita Michael

Deputy Clerk

JEANNETTE J. CLACK

CLERK OF COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS PHILIP J. DEVLIN

OFFICE OF THE CLERK CHIEF DEPUTY

800 FRANKLIN AVE., ROOM 380

WACO, TX 76701

July 1, 2020

Case 6:20-cv-00500-ADA Document 18 Filed 07/01/20 Page 1 of 1
# ACTION:

 Notice and request for comments.

# SUMMARY:

 The Federal Emergency Management Agency has submitted the following proposed information collection to the Office of Management and Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507).

*Title:*                        Request for Site Inspection, Landowners Authorization/Ingress/Egress Agreement.                    

*Type of Information Collection:*                        Reinstatement without change of a previously approved collection.                    

*OMB Number:*                        3067-0222.                    

*Abstract:*                        Public Law 93-288, as amended by Public Law 100-707, the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Section 408, authorizes the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to provide Temporary Housing Assistance. Mobile homes, travel trailers, or other forms of readily fabricated housing are used to provide housing to eligible victims of federally declared disasters. The collection of this information is required to determine the site feasibility for the placement of a temporary housing unit on the land, and rights of ingress and egress for the unit. FEMA Form 90-1, Request for Site Inspection, is designed to ensure sites for temporary housing units will accommodate the home and comply with local, State and Federal regulations regarding the placement of the temporary housing units; FEMA Form 90-31, Landowner's Authorization/Ingress-Egress Agreement, ensures the landowner (if other than the recipient of the home) will allow the temporary housing unit to be placed on the property; and ensure that routes on ingress and egress to and from the main property are maintained.                    

*Affected Public:*                        Individuals or households.                    

*Number of Respondents:*                        1,000.                    

*Estimated Time per Respondent:*                        10 minutes for each form.                    

*Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*                        333.                    

*Frequency of Response:*                        On Occasion.                    

## Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the proposed information collection to the Desk Officer for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 on or before March 8, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection should be made to Muriel B. Anderson, FEMA Information Collections Officer, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Room 316, Washington, DC 20472. Telephone number (202) 646-2625. FAX number (202) 646-3524.

Dated: January 13, 2000.

Mike Bozzelli,

Acting Director Program Services Division, Operations Support Directorate.

[FR Doc. 00-2665 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 195 (Friday, October 6, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59796-59797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25737]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2213, MM Docket No. 00-182, RM-9957]


Digital Television Broadcast Service; Sumter, SC

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by 
McLaughlin Broadcasting, Inc., licensee of Station WQHG-TV, NTSC 
Channel 63, Sumter, South Carolina, proposing the substitution of DTV 
Channel 39 for Station WQHB-TV's assigned DTV Channel 38. DTV Channel 
39 can be allotted to Sumter, South Carolina, in compliance with the 
principle community coverage requirements of Section 73.625(a) at 
reference coordinates (34-06-33N. and 80-44-35 W.). As requested, we 
propose to allot DTV Channel 39 to Sumter with a power of 500 and a 
height above average terrain (HAAT) of 269 meters.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before November 27, 2000, and reply 
comments on or before December 12, 2000.

[[Page 59797]]


ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 
TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the 
FCC, interested parties should serve the petitioner, or its counsel or 
consultant, as follows: Gene A. Bechtel, Bechtel and Cole, Chartered, 
Suite 250, 1901 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036 (Counsel for 
McLaughlin Broadcasting, Inc.).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 00-182, adopted October 
3, 2000, and released October 4, 2000. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-25737 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Document

Exhibit 10.1

ROSS STORES, INC.
NOTICE OF GRANT OF PERFORMANCE SHARES


The Participant has been granted an award of Performance Shares (the “Award”) pursuant to the Ross Stores, Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and the Performance Share Agreement attached hereto (the “Agreement”), as follows:
															
	Participant:	[•]
	Employee ID: [•]
	Award/Grant #: [•]

	Grant Date:	[•]
		
	Target Number of Performance Shares:	

[•], subject to adjustment as provided by the Agreement.

	Maximum Number of Performance Shares:	

200% of the Target Number of Performance Shares.

	Fiscal Year 2021 Performance Goal Achievement	The determination of Vested Performance Shares under this award will be determined based on a 50/50 weighting of the levels of achievement of: (1) the full-year target for adjusted pre-tax profit* as stated below (quantitative measure); and (2) 2021 Key Business Priorities (qualitative measure) as assessed by the Committee.

	*Adjusted Pre-Tax Profit Target
(50% of performance goal achievement)
	$[•]

	Performance Period:	Company fiscal year beginning [•] and ending [•].

	Performance Share Vesting Date:	
[•], except as provided by the Agreement.

	Vested Performance Shares:	Provided that the Participant’s Service has not terminated prior to the Performance Share Vesting Date, except as provided by the Agreement, on the Performance Share Vesting Date the number of Vested Performance Shares (not to exceed the Maximum Number of Performance Shares) shall be determined by multiplying the Target Number of Performance Shares by the following formula: the Adjusted Pre-tax Profit Multiplier (as defined by the Agreement) multiplied by 0.5, plus the achievement percentage level of the 2021 Key Business Priorities (as determined by the Committee) multiplied by 0.5.

	Settlement Date:	The Performance Share Vesting Date, except as otherwise provided by the Agreement.

	Vested Common Shares:	Except as provided by the Agreement and provided that the Participant’s Service has not terminated prior to the relevant date, the number of Vested Common Shares shall cumulatively increase on each respective date set forth below by the Vested Percentage set forth opposite such date, multiplied by the actual number of Vested Performance Shares, as follows:

	Common Share Vesting Date	Vested Percentage
	Settlement Date	30%
	[•]
	30%
	[•]
	40%
	Employment Agreement:	Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and the Participant, as in effect at any applicable time.







			
	By your electronic acceptance, you agree that this Award is granted under and governed by the terms of the Plan, as amended, and the Agreement, all of which are made a part of this document.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.3

      Agreement to Extend "First Amendment to Boston Life Sciences, Inc.
               Warrants for Purchase of Shares of Common Stock"

This agreement is meant to extend the previous "First Amendment" signed on May
27, 2001 by Mr. Yves Martignier, Pictet Global Sector Fund-Biotech, which
extended the "Reset" of Pictet's Boston Life Sciences, Inc. Warrants from June
1, 2001 to June 15, 2001.

The extension granted hereby will be June 25, 2001.  Exactly the same provisions
of the previous amendment shall apply to this extension and no other changes of
any kind shall apply to the provision of the Warrants which shall remain
unmodified and of full force and effect as originally set forth.


Accepted and Agreed

Pictet Global Sector Fund-Biotech       Boston Life Sciences, Inc.


/s/ Yves Martignier                     /s/ David Hillson
---------------------------------       ---------------------------------
Yves Martignier, Director               David Hillson, President &
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 13, 2001                     Date: June 13, 2001
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
Section 1350

                             As Adopted Pursuant to

                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, David Kalenuik, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Larrea
            BioSciences Corporation;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
            untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
            necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
            under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
            to the period covered by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
            information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
            material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
            cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
            in this annual report.

Date:  August 13, 2004                      /s/David Kalenuik
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David Kalenuik
                                            Chief Executive Officer
ALAN TROY SIKES ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4678

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 1, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County.

Gregory S. Parker, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

 RAY, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 99(c)

 

 

	Certificate as to Compliance
 

	I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of Household Finance Corporation (the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 20, 2002 among HFC Revolving Corporation, as Depositor, Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2002-2, Master Servicer and J.P.Morgan Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as Bank One, National Association), as Indenture Trustee, that:

	1.  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from January 1 through December 31, 2003 (the "Year") and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

	2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the Year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 25th day of March, 2004.                              

 

						/s/ Steven H. Smith		
					Steven H. Smith

					Servicing Officer

 

HEL 2002-2
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 26014.

Court of Criminal Appeals *of*Texas.

Nov. 5, 1952.

*197No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant pleaded guilty before the court to the offense of theft of property of the value of over $5 and under $50, and her punishment was assessed at 30 days in jail.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC. 

AND ZTE (TX), INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00487-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00488-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00489-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00490-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00491-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00492-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00493-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00494-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00495-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00496-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00497-ADA

[PROPOSED] DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS UNTIL 

RESOLUTION OF FEDERAL CIRCUIT RULING ON VENUE

Came on for consideration Defendant’s Motion to Stay All Proceedings Until 

Resolution of the Federal Circuit Ruling on Venue. The Court having considered the Motion, 

the authorities cited therein, and any response thereto, finds that the Motion should be 

GRANTED.

It is therefore ORDERED that all case activity is stayed until a decision in In re ZTE 

Corporation, No. 122-2022, (Fed. Cir. Jan. 20, 2022) (“In re ZTE”).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED AND ENTERED this _______ day of ___________________, 2022.

________________________________

ALAN D. ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00490-ADA-DTG Document 154-1 Filed 01/25/22 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                         AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT
                                     BETWEEN
                                  ORGANIX, INC.
                                       AND
                           BOSTON LIFE SCIENCES, INC.,
                          EFFECTIVE AS OF JULY 1, 2000
                            RE: HARVARD CASE NO: 1382
                                 (THE "LICENSE")

Article 1.12, the definition of "PATENT RIGHTS," shall be amended to read as
follows: U.S. Patent No. 5,948,933 filed July 11, 1997 entitled "Tropane Analogs
and Methods for Inhibition of Monoamine Transport," the U.S. Patent Application
Serial No. 60/327,963 filed October 9, 2001 entitled "Tropane Analogs and
Methods for Inhibition of Monoamine Transport," the U.S. Patent Application
Serial No. 10/033,621 filed December 27, 2001 entitled "Tropane Analogs and
Methods for Inhibition of Monoamine Transport," the U.S. Patent Application
Serial No. 60/368,382 filed March 28, 2002 entitled "Tropane Compounds," the
U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 60/375,505 filed April 25, 2002 entitled
"Tropane Compounds," the U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 10/400,825 filed
March 27, 2003 entitled "Tropane Compounds," and any foreign (Non-U.S.)
counterparts including continuations, divisions or extensions and all patents
which issue therefrom in any country. It also includes continuations-in-part of
the above-listed applications for which Drs. Paul Blundell, Zhengming Chen,
Bertha Madras, and/or Peter Meltzer, are legally listed among the inventive
entity and any foreign (Non-U.S.) counterparts including continuations,
divisions or extensions and all patents which issue therefrom in any country.

All other terms and conditions of the License shall remain unchanged. This
amendment shall become effective on April 1, 2007.

BOSTON LIFE SCIENCES, INC.              ORGANIX, INC.


/s/ Kenneth L. Rice                     /s/ Peter Meltzer
-------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
Name: Kenneth L. Rice, Jr.              Name: Peter Meltzer
Position: EVP & CFO                     Position: President
Date: 3/23/07                           Date: 4/4/07
#### GAINES v. STATE.

No. 27078.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 26, 1954.

Reid & Reid, by J. W. Reid, Abilene, for appellant. ... *'■*

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The appeal is from a- conviction for selling beer in a dry area, a fine of $100 and 30 days in jail having been assessed as punishment.

The complaint in this cause was sworn to on October 3, 1953. It alleged that appellant sold beer to. James L. Douglas on or about October 17, -1953.

The complaint having been sworn to before the offense was ’ allegedly committed, the conviction cannot stand. Gaines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 269 S.W.2d 679.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6087** 

BRYAN KEITH RICHARDSON , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. RUSSELL PERDUE , Respondent

– Appellee , and R. PERDUE, Warden; SMITH, A.W.; DOES 1 THRU 8 , Respondents
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling
. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 5:14

- cv - 00061

- FPS

- JSK )

Submitted : April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Bryan Keith Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bryan Keith Richardson , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denyin g relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) p etition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Perdue , No. 5:14

- cv - 00061

- FPS

- JSK (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 8, 2015) . We dispense with oral argument because th e facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED