alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TERONE WOODS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-605

[May 6, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09014480CF10A.

Fred Haddad of Fred Haddad, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Catherine Linton, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See D.S. v. State, 122 So. 3d 482, 483 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)

(“Where, by objective standards, probable cause to arrest for a certain 

offense exists, the validity of an arrest does not turn on the fact that an 

arrest was effected on another charge.”). 

STEVENSON, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2673 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to provide that residential mortgage 

loans held on portfolio qualify as qualified mortgages for purposes of 

the presumption of the ability to repay requirements under such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2013 

Mr. BARR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to provide that residential mortgage loans held on portfolio qualify as qualified 

mortgages for purposes of the presumption of the ability 

to repay requirements under such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Portfolio Lending and 

5 Mortgage Access Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2673 IH

1 SEC. 2. LOANS HELD ON PORTFOLIO TREATED AS QUALI2 FIED MORTGAGES. 

3 Section 129C(b)(2) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 

4 U.S.C. 1639c(b)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(F) LOANS HELD ON PORTFOLIO.—The 

7 term ‘qualified mortgage’ includes a residential 

8 mortgage loan made by a creditor so long as 

9 such loan appears on the balance sheet of such 

10 creditor.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


              CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS

        This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

        The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certify
as follows:

        The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company (the "Report"), which
accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

        Dated this 31st day of March, 2005.


                                        /s/ Robert M. Behringer
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert M. Behringer, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Gary S. Bresky
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Gary S. Bresky, Chief Financial Officer
                                        and Treasurer
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

30 32 34 36 38 40 42 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
D-6.i APPENDIX D-6. METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE INPUT ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF SIDE ARM GAS STORAGE WATER HEATER DESIGNSD-6.1 in p in amb

on amb 

### Q vol dens CT T RE UA T T P UA T T = ⋅ ⋅⋅ −

⋅ − ⋅ −       +⋅ ⋅ − () ( ( ) tank tank tank 

### 1 24

out p in 

### Q M CT T = ⋅⋅ − ( ) tank

in out out amb

on amb 

### Q Q RE Q UA T T RE P UA T T = − ⋅⋅ −

⋅ +⋅ ⋅ − ( ) ( ) tank tank 

### 24 APPENDIX D-6. METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE INPUT ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF SIDE ARM GAS STORAGE WATER HEATER DESIGNS Because the TANK simulation model cannot simulate the performance of water heaters equipped with side arm heaters, the WHAM energy calculation method was used to estimate its energy performance. 1 If both the energy factor and recovery efficiency are known, WHAM can determine the UA of the water heater and, in turn, its energy consumption. According to the WHAM energy calculation method, the equation for determining the average daily energy input is as follows:

where; Q in= average daily energy input, RE = recovery efficiency from test procedure, UA = standby heat loss coefficient from test procedure, Pon = rated input, vol= average volume of water drawn in 24 hr, 5 dens = density of water, C

p = specific heat of water, T

tank = tank thermostat set point, T

in = inlet water temperature, and T

amb = ambient air temperature surrounding the water heater Because the energy output (the energy delivered to the water) can be expressed as

where; Q out = daily energy output, and M = vol # dens , the daily energy input can be expressed as follows:D-6.2 

### UA P RE EF RE P on

on 

### = ⋅ −      

⋅ ⋅⋅ −

      1 67 5 24 41094 1

. EF RE P P UA RE P on

on on 

### = ⋅ +⋅ ⋅ ⋅⋅ −       67 5 24 41094 1

. The energy factor (EF ) is the ratio of the energy output ( Q out) to the energy input ( Q in). Thus, using the above expression for Q in , as well as DOE test procedure values of 135 ( F (57.2 ( C), 67.5 ( F (19.7 ( C), and 41094 Btu (43356 kJ) for T tank , T amb, and Q out , the energy factor can be expressed with the following equation:

Solving the above expression for UA yields the following equation:

Thus, knowing EF and RE and assuming DOE test procedure values for T tank , T amb, and Q out , the UA can be determined. With UA established, the daily energy input, Q in , can be calculated. This was the procedure used for establishing the total daily energy input for water heaters equipped with side arm heaters.D-6.3 REFERENCE 1. Lutz, J., C. D. Whitehead, A. Lekov, D. Winiarski, and G. Rosenquist, WHAM: A Simplified Energy Consumption Equation for Water Heaters. In 1998 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings . 1998. Asilomar, CA, August 23-28, 1998: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. 1: p. 1.171-1.183.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.B


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2004, of Southern Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Director, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Greg G. Gruber
                                           Senior Vice President, Chief
                                           Financial Officer, Treasurer
                                             and Director
                                           (Principal Financial
                                             and Accounting Officer)

                                           November 12, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Southern Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Southern
Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
|                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                          
|                                                                                                       
|Texas--RRC District 1 Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                       
|Texas--RRC District 1 Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 1      | 95     | 107    | 33     | 72     | 27     | 50     | 68     | 74    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 64     | 5      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-500-001]

Take notice that on October 5, 2000, Chandeleur Pipe Line Company (Chandeleur) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to be effective October 1, 2000.

Second Revised Sheet No. 3A

                    Chandeleur asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the                           ( print page 62339)                        Commission's Letter order issued September 25, 2000 in Docket No. RP00-500-000.                

Chandeleur states that it is correcting a pagination error in Sheet No. 3A as directed by the Commission. No content changes have been made to the Sheet No. 3A other than the pagination change as requested.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26683  Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# ß."S

# sleù¿*

LEHIGH

¡{E IDELBERG CEM ENT Group
March 

### 21,2007
Overnight Mr. Peter Tsirigotis Director, Sector Policies 

### and Programs Division United States 

### Environmental Protection Agency Research 

### Triangle Park, 

### NC 27711 

## Re: Lehigh 

### Cement Company Mason 

### City, lowa Plant Mercury Stack Testing
Dear Mr.Tsirigotis:

Lehigh 

### Cement Company is in receipt of

### your March 

### 15,2007 letter regarding new source standards for 

### the Portland Cement 

### Manufacturing lndustry 

### for mercury based on the performance of a

### wet

### scrubber. The letter states 

### that ifthe 

### test protocol is 

### approved in a

### timely manner, 

### that Lehigh anticipates 

### submittingthe 

### test data results to EPA byJune 

### 30,

### 2007. Lehigh is unaware 

### of howthis Ç4te

### wasderived, butwe will strive 

### to send the 

### test data 

### to EPA as soon as practical.T [-o 

### that extent, please be aware that 

### the Mason 

### City Plant

### will be shutting down 

### fqrlits annual 

### winter maintenance 

### outage beginning 

### April 1

### ,2007. This outage is

### an unusu-ally long one and 

### will last at least seven weeks and conclude 

### around May 

### 26,2007. The reason for 

### the long outage is Lehigh 

### will be installing 

### a new clinker cooler and its

### associated new baghouse as 

### approved under our 

### current NSR/PSD 

### permit. Once 

### the kiln is back 

### on line, any and all 

### start-up problems 

### are resolved, and steady state 

### operation isachieved for two weeks, Lehigh will conduct 

### the mercury stack 

### testing. As you 

### can see, it is not possible 

### to meet the 

### June 

### 30,2007 submittal date.

Thank you and 

### we look fon¡vardto working 

### withthe 

### Agency inthis effort. Sincerely, 

# ñAa

Timothy L. Matz 

### Corporate Environmental Manager 

### TLM/jmt 

# c: G. McKervey

# - Mason City 

### R. Dunn

## - Mason City Lehigh Cement Company CORPORATE OFFICE 7660 lmperial Way Allentown, PA 18195-1040 Phone (610) 366-4600 Fax (610) 366-4851 www.lehighcement.com
[LETTERHEAD
        OF STAF*TEK]
 
 
 **PROMISSORY
        NOTE**
 TO
 MRS.
        PHYLLIS L. BELL
 
 
 $40,000.00
              May
                  19, 2005
 
 
 For
        value
        received, STAF*TEK SERVICES, INC., of Tulsa, Oklahoma, (herein referred to
        as
‘maker’) promises to pay to the order of PHYLLIS L. BELL, (herein referred to as
        ‘payee’) on or before May 31, 2005 the principal sum of Forty Thousand and
        No/100 Dollars ($40,000.00) plus $100.00.
 
 Payment
        of this note shall be as follows: One lump sum payment of $40,000.00 plus
        $100.00 interest.
 
 Maker
        may
        prepay this note in whole or in part without penalty or surcharge at any
        time
        prior to the maturity date.
 
 The
        maker
        hereby severally waives presentment for payment, notice of nonpayment, protest
        and notice to protest, and aggress that extensions of the time for payment
        may
        be granted without notice. In case of legal proceedings to collect this note,
        maker agrees to pay all court costs including reasonable attorneys’ fees to
        payee as prevailing parties in the suit.
 
 IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is signed the 19 th day of
        May, 2005.
 
 
 /s/
                  Shelia Hobens
              
              /s/
                  John H. SimmonsShelia
                  Hobens
              
              John
                  H. Simmons, President, C.E.O.Staf*Tek
                  Services, Inc.4870
                  S. Lewis St., Ste. 250Tulsa,
                  Oklahoma 74105
Exhibit 23


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-110552 and 333-131455) and S-8 (Nos. 333-160867 333-114897 and 333-118771) of Access National Corporation and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 29, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of Access National Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.


/s/ BDO USA, LLP





BDO USA, LLP


Richmond, Virginia


March 29, 2011
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

The undersigned officerof StockerYale, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’squarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 
| Date:  November 8, 2002 | Name:  | /s/**Francis J. O’Brien            |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Francis J. O’Brien                 |
|                    |   |                                    |
|                    |   |                                    |
|                    | Title: | Chief  Financial Officer and  Treasurer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1831

FRANKLIN TEDONGOH FORLEMU,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A97-187-124)

Submitted: April 7, 2006 Decided: May 3, 2006

Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D.

Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Leslie McKay, Senior

Litigation Assistant, Janet A. Bradley, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION

LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Franklin Tedongoh Forlemu, a native and citizen of

Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the immigration

judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

In his petition for review, Forlemu challenges the

determination that he failed to establish his eligibility for

asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility

for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was

so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the

requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S.

478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and

conclude that Forlemu fails to show that the evidence compels a

contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that he

seeks.

Additionally, we uphold the denial of Forlemu’s request

for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for

withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the

facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is

ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of

removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft, 378

F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because Forlemu fails to show that
- 3 -

he is eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for

withholding of removal. 

We also find that substantial evidence supports the

finding that Forlemu fails to meet the standard for relief under

the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an

applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that he

or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of

removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2005). We find that Forlemu

failed to make the requisite showing before the immigration court.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



                                               Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Stephan Co. (the "Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Frank F. Ferola, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Frank F. Ferola
__________________________________
Frank F. Ferola
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003