alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

703 

CA 14-02109 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CARNI, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

RICHARD E. ROLLS, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

(CLAIM NO. 119923.) 

 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL),

FOR CLAIMANT-APPELLANT. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (KATE H. NEPVEU OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Richard E. Sise,

A.J.), entered July 22, 2014. The order denied the motion of claimant

for partial summary judgment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously reversed on the law without costs, and the motion is

granted. 

Memorandum: Claimant commenced this action seeking damages for

injuries he sustained when a state-owned vehicle driven by defendant’s

employee pulled out in front of him at an intersection where claimant

had the right-of-way. Claimant, who was riding a motorcycle, braked

and swerved to avoid colliding with the vehicle, and the motorcycle

tipped over. Claimant was not subject to any traffic control devices

at the intersection, but defendant’s employee was subject to a stop

sign.

The Court of Claims erred in denying claimant’s motion for

partial summary judgment on the issue of negligence. “It is well

settled that a driver ‘who has the right[-]of[-]way is entitled to

anticipate that [the drivers of] other vehicles will obey the traffic

laws that require them to yield’ ” (Lescenski v Williams, 90 AD3d

1705, 1705, lv denied 18 NY3d 811). Here, claimant met his initial

burden on the motion by establishing as a matter of law that the sole

proximate cause of the accident was the failure of defendant’s

employee to yield the right-of-way to him at the intersection (see

Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1142 [a]; 1172 [a]). In support of the

motion, claimant submitted evidence demonstrating that he was

traveling at a speed of approximately 50 miles per hour in a 55 mile

per hour zone. As he approached the intersection, claimant began to

brake when he saw defendant’s employee roll forward at the stop sign. 
-2- 703 

CA 14-02109 

Claimant released the brakes when defendant’s employee stopped at the

stop sign but, when claimant was within 25 feet of the intersection,

defendant’s employee suddenly pulled out in front of him, causing

claimant to brake, swerve, and tip over (see Guadagno v Norward, 43

AD3d 1432, 1433; Wallace v Kuhn, 23 AD3d 1042, 1043).

In response, defendant failed to “raise[] a triable issue of fact

whether [claimant] ‘was at fault in the happening of the accident or

whether he could have done anything to avoid the collision’ ”

(Wallace, 23 AD3d at 1043). Defendant’s contention that claimant

failed to take action to avoid the accident is “ ‘based on speculation

and is insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment’ ”

(Liskiewicz v Hameister, 104 AD3d 1194, 1195).

Entered: June 19, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

The Air University Board of Visitors will hold an open meeting on November 12-15, 2000, with the first business session beginning at 8 a.m. in the Air University Conference Room at Headquarters Air University, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama (five seats are available). 

The purpose of the meeting is to give the board an opportunity to review Air University educational programs and to present to the Commander, a report of their findings and recommendations concerning these programs. 

For further information on this meeting, contact Dr. Dorothy Reed, Chief of Academic Affairs, Air University Headquarters, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6335, telephone (334) 953-5159. 

Janet A. Long, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-26099 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
#### FERGUSON v. STATE.

No. 26001.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $250.

The State has filed a motion to strike the statement of facts and the bill of exception on the grounds that they were filed too late.

The motion for new trial was overruled on March 31, 1952.

The statement of facts and bill of exception were filed on June 30, 1952, and hence were filed too late.

For an exhaustive discussion of the identical fact situation here presented, attention is directed to Bichon v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 230 S.W.2d 812.

The State’s motion is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1257, -1266

DORBEST LIMITED, RUI FENG WOODWORK (DONGGUAN) CO., LTD.,

and RUI FENG LUMBER DEVELOPMENT (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and

AMERICAN FURNITURE MANUFACTURERS COMMITTEE FOR LEGAL TRADE,

and VAUGHAN-BASSETT FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and

CABINET MAKERS, MILLMEN AND INDUSTRIAL CARPENTERS LOCAL 721,

UBC SOUTHERN COUNCIL OF INDUSTRIAL WORKERS LOCAL 2305,

UNITED STEEL WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 193U,

CARPENTERS INDUSTRIAL UNION LOCAL 2093,

TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS LOCAL 991,

and IUE INDUSTRIAL DIVISION OF CWA LOCAL 82472,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DONGGUAN LUNG DONG and DON HE,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

ART HERITAGE INTERNATIONAL LTD., SUPER ART FURNITURE CO., LTD.,

ARTWORK METAL & PLASTIC CO., LTD., JIBSON INDUSTRIES LTD.,

ALWAYS LOYAL INTERNATIONAL, FORTUNE GLORY LTD. (HK LTD.),

NANHAI JIANTAI WOODWORK CO., FINE FURNITURE (SHANGHAI) LTD., COASTER

COMPANY OF AMERICA, COLLEZIONE EUROPA USA, INC.,
FINE FURNITURE DESIGN & MARKETING LLC, GLOBAL FURNITURES, INC.,

HILLSDALE FURNITURE, LLC, KLAUSSNER INTERNATIONAL, LLC,

MAGNUSSEN HOME FURNISHINGS, INC., L. POWELL COMPANY,

RIVERSEDGE FURNITURE COMPANY,

WOODSTUFF MANUFACTURING, INC. (doing business as Samuel Lawrence),

SCHNADIG CORPORATION, GOOD COMPANIES,

and STANDARD FURNITURE MANUFACTURING CO., INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in

case no. 05-00003, Judge Donald C. Pogue.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the appellants' unopposed motion for a 14 day extension of

time, until June 1, 2009, to file their opening briefs,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

MAY - 7 2009

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk MitalarUITPOR

cc:	J. Michael Taylor, Esq.

Jeffrey S. Grimson, Esq.

Kristin Heim Mowry, Esq.

Robert G. Gosselink, Esq.

Carrie A. Dunsmore, Esq.

s8

MAY -7 2009

JAW HORBALY

CLERK

2009-1257, -1266 - 2 -
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Storage Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 25, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Patrick J. Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ PATRICK J. MARTIN 
Patrick J. MartinChief Executive Officer August 2, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 21, 2011

h1114

Order 

November 21, 2011

142930 & (21)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142930

COA: 298508

RITA WILSON, Wayne CC: 88-007896-FC

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion for remand is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5679 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5679

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of 5-methyl-5-
(4-phenoxyphenyl)-3- (phenyl-amino)-2,4-oxazolidinedione](famoxadone), 
     2-cyano-N-[(ethylamino)- carbonyl]-2-(methoxyimino)acetamide 
                 (Cymoxanil) and application adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of 5-methyl-5-
(4-phenoxyphenyl)-3- (phenyl-amino)-2,4-oxazolidinedione](famoxadone), 
     2-cyano-N-[(ethylamino)- carbonyl]-2-(methoxyimino)acetamide 
                 (Cymoxanil) and application adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF 5-METHYL-5-(4-PHENOXYPHENYL)-3- (PHENYL-AMINO)-
              2,4-OXAZOLIDINEDIONE](FAMOXADONE), 2-CYANO-N-
              [(ETHYLAMINO)- CARBONYL]-2-(METHOXYIMINO)ACETAMIDE 
              (CYMOXANIL) AND APPLICATION ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.45 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures of 5-methyl-5-(4-
phenoxyphenyl)-3- (phenyl-amino)-2,4-oxazolidinedione](famoxadone), 2-
cyano-N-[(ethylamino)- carbonyl]-2-(methoxyimino)acetamide (Cymoxanil) 
and application adjuvants) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-571, -

572, -573-, -574, -575, -576, -577, -

578, -579, -580, -581, -582, -583, -

584, -585

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development files this 

disclosure statement pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and states the 

following: WSOU Investments, LLC is a private corporation whose parent is WSOU Holdings, 

LLC. Neither entity is public traded.

Dated: June 29, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge

Texas State Bar No. 24059147 

Ryan S. Loveless

Texas State Bar No. 24036997 

Travis L. Richins

Texas State Bar No. 24061296

ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Telephone: (817) 470-7249

Facsimile: (817) 887-5950

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 3 Filed 06/29/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document was served upon all counsel of record via the Court's 

CM/ECF electronic filing system in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on June 

29, 2020.

/s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge

Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 3 Filed 06/29/20 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999<F1>
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                       0
<CASH>                                         739,863
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 745,747
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     460,839<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   745,747
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                  0
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                           0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (154,365)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY IS CURRENTLY USING LIQUIDATION ACCOUNTING
<F2>NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
</FN>



</TABLE>
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION





I, Khurram R. Qureshi, Chief Financial Officer of Lingo Media Inc., certify that:



I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Lingo Media Inc.



Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.



Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in the report.



I and the other certifying officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the Company.



I and the other certifying officers have designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information is made known to us, particularly during the period in which the periodic report is being prepared.



I and the other certifying officers have evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report; and



I and the other certifying officers have presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required evaluation as of that date.



I and the other certifying officers have disclosed to the Companys auditors and to the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):



(i)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



(ii)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and



I and the other certifying officers have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Dated:  July 14, 2005







BY: /s/ KHURRAM R. QURESHI

Khurram R. Queshi

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

March 29, 2004


        Management Report on Internal Control over the administration of
       the Chase Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2002-5 (the "Owner Trust")

Management of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the "Bank") is responsible for
establishing and maintaining effective internal control over its Administration
of the Certificates held by the Owner Trust and the Notes issued by the Owner
Trust ("Administration" of the Owner Trust), which is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the proper Administration of the Owner Trust. The
Bank's internal control system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions
are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in any internal control, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls.
Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to Administration of the Owner Trust. Further, because of
changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

Management of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. assessed its internal control over
its Administration of the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003 in relation to the
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management
believes that Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained effective internal
control over the Administration of the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003,
based on the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ Keith Schuck
-------------------------
Keith Schuck
Senior Vice President/CFO
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.

/s/ Patricia Garvey
-------------------------
Patricia Garvey
Senior Vice President
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1427 

KA 13-01907 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

MARK M. UTLEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

NORMAN P. EFFMAN, PUBLIC DEFENDER, WARSAW (GREGORY A. KILBURN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

DONALD G. O’GEEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WARSAW (VINCENT A. HEMMING OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Mark H. Dadd,

J.), rendered July 22, 2013. The judgment revoked defendant’s

sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court