alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Joel Williams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Monarch Staffing,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I am responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:


(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 10, 2007        /s/ Joel Williams
                              ---------------------------------------
                                  Joel Williams
                                  Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code) Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Sterling Bancorp, a New York corporation (the Company), hereby certifies
that: The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008 (the Report)
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company. Dated:
August 11, 2008
/s/ John W. TietjenName: John W. TietjenTitle: Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 50
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. 

and HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA 

INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-533-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-534-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-535-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-536-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-537-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-538-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-539-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-540-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-541-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-542-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-543-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-544-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS

Having considered Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss Defendants’ Counterclaims and the 

briefing on the motion, the Court finds the motion should be GRANTED. Defendants’ 

counterclaims for non-infringement and invalidity are HEREBY DISMISSED.

Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 23-1 Filed 10/06/20 Page 1 of 1
Docket Number: FAA-2013-0626
Exhibit 99.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

         I, Andres E. Serrano, Vice President of The Bank of New York, acting as
trustee under the trust agreement described below, hereby certify that pursuant
to the Core Investment Grade Bond Trust I Trust Agreement, dated as of November
20, 2002, among Core Bond Products LLC, as Depositor, The Bank of New York, as
Trustee and Securities Intermediary (the "Trustee") and Banc of America
Securities LLC, as Administrative Agent (the "Trust Agreement"), the Trustee has
complied with all servicing obligations and all distribution obligations
pursuant to the Trust Agreement for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002.
The undersigned notes, however, that because no distributions were required
under the Trust Agreement for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, no such
servicing or distribution obligations arose during such period.


                                    By:  /s/ Andres E. Serrano
                                         --------------------------
                                    Name:    Andres E. Serrano
                                    Title:   Vice President
                                    Date:    March 15, 2004
#### Moses SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee (three cases).

Nos. 27154, 27159, 27160.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 10, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM. , ;

The offense is the unlawful sale of whiskey in a dry area; the punishment, one day in jail.

: The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for-our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 27019.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 2, 1954.

*676No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The offense is the unlawful possession of wine and beer for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $225.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, without which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26636]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Florida Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Florida Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1 p.m. 
and adjourn at 5 p.m. on Tuesday, November 14, 2000, at the Wyndham 
Orlando Hotel, 8001 International Drive, Orlando, Florida 32819. The 
purpose of the meeting is to provide new member orientation and discuss 
such topics as affirmative action in Florida, the Governor's ``One 
Florida Plan,'' immigration, education, and other current civil rights 
issues.
    Persons desiring additional information or planning a presentation 
to the Committee should contact Bobby D. Doctor, Director of the 
Southern Regional Office, 404-562-7000 (TDD 404-562-7004). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, October 11, 2000.
Lisa M. Kelly,
Special Assistant to the Staff Director, Regional Programs Coordination 
Unit.
[FR Doc. 00-26636 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PHILLIP TAVARRIS COPELAND

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1063

[ March 14, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; John S. Kastrenakes , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502015CF007782AXXXMB

.

Jack A. Fleischman of Fleischman & Fleischman, P.A., West Palm

Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P.

Picard, Assistant Attorney General, Wes t Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., T AYLOR and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### OLDS v. BURTON et al.

No. 2448.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

May 5, 1944.

Rehearing Denied June 2, 1944.

*119S. M. Adams, of Nacogdoches, for appellant.

McAlister & Tucker, of Nacogdoches, for appellees.

GRISSOM, Justice.

In June, 1943, Bobbie Olds obtained a ■divorce from her husband, Troy Olds. In the divorce case she was awarded custody •of their six year old son, except from the 10th of June to the 31st of August of each year, during which time the father was to have custody of the boy. Thereafter, Mrs. Olds married Ted Burton and is now a resident of California The custody of the child was so awarded, with the consent of Troy Olds. Troy Olds had agreed in writing that his wife might have custody of their son “in whatever place she may reside in the United States.” On the 30th of August, 1943, one day prior to the time when, under the judgment in the divorce case, he was required to deliver his son to Mrs. Burton, Troy Olds instituted a proceeding to readjudicate the custody of the child, alleging a change in conditions since the former judgment materially affecting the welfare of the child. Upon the trial the court refused to change the former order. Troy Olds has appealed.

But one question is presented on this appeal. Appellant contends that the court erred in sustaining objections to testimony offered by him tending to show that his former wife was cruel to the child and guilty of misconduct prior to the rendition of the judgment in the divorce case, which conduct he alleges was unknown to him at that time. The law seems to be definitely settled in Texas that under such circumstances proof of misconduct prior to the rendition of the original judgment is not ordinarily admissible in a subsequent proceeding of this nature. Wilson v. Elliott, 96 Tex. 472, 73 S.W. 946, 97 Am.St.Rep. 928, and Wilson v. Elliott, 96 Tex. 472, 75 S.W. 368, 97 Am.St.Rep. 928. See also Lakey v. McCarroll, 134 Tex. 191, 199, 134 S.W.2d 1016; Evans v. Taylor, Tex.Civ.App., 128 S.W.2d 77, 79; Goldsmith v. Salkey, 131 Tex. 139, 145, 112 S.W.2d 165, 116 A.L.R. *1293;*Conley v. St. Jacques, Tex.Civ.App, 110 S.W.2d 1238, 1241; Brillhart v. Brillhart, Tex.Civ.App., 176 S.W.2d 229; and 15 Tex.Jur. 682. There is an exception to this rule. Evidence of misconduct prior to the original decree is admissible for the purpose of corroborating testimony of subsequent similar misconduct. The exception is inapplicable here. There is no evidence of such subsequent misconduct. The trial court did not err in refusing to admit the proffered testimony. The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Robin J. Harvey, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Rival Technologies Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.  Date:   July 6, 2007/s/ Robin J. Harvey
Robin J. Harvey
Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 12

Computation of Ratio of Earnings
to Fixed Charges
Cellco Partnership (d/b/a Verizon Wireless)

|                                                   |  | Year
    Ended December 31,
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|(in millions,
    except ratio)                    |  |                            
|                                                   |  |                            
|                                                  
|                                                   |  |                            
|Income from continuing operations
before provision |  |                            
|for income taxes and
 cumulative effect of a       |  |                            
|change in accounting
 principle                    |  | $                          
|Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated entities |  |                            
|Interest expense                                   |  |                            
|Amortization of debt issuance costs                |  |                            
|Portion of rent expense representing interest      |  |                            
|Amortization of capitalized interest               |  |                            
|Distributions from unconsolidated entities         |  |                            
|                                                   |  |                            
|Income, as adjusted                                |  | $                          
|                                                   |  |                            
|                                                   |  |                            
|Fixed Charges:                                     |  |                            
|Interest expense                                   |  | $                          
|Capitalized interest                               |  |                            
|Amortization of debt issuance costs                |  |                            
|Preferred return requirement of a consolidated     |  |                            
|subsidiary                                         |  |                            
|Portion of rent expense representing interest      |  |                            
|                                                   |  |                            
|Fixed charges                                      |  | $                          
|                                                   |  |                            
|                                                   |  |                            
|                                                   |  |                            
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 |  |                            
|                                                  

---
June 25, 2015 

Mr. Justin Quigley 

Birdseye Productions, LLC 

2413 S. Lillian Avenue 

Sioux Falls, SD 57106 

Dear Mr. Quigley: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 9, exemption request on behalf of Birdseye Productions, LLC into the 

public docket (No. FAA-2015-2195), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 200 (Monday, October 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61148-61149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26411]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Domestic Advisory Panel (DAP) on Early Intervention and Education 
for Infants, Toddlers, Preschool Children, and Children With 
Disabilities

AGENCY: Department of Defense Domestic Dependent Elementary and 
Secondary Schools (DDESS)

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. app. II), 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that a 
meeting of the Domestic Advisory Panel (DAP) on Early Intervention and 
Education for Infants, Toddlers, Preschool Children, and Children with 
Disabilities is scheduled to be held from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. on November 
14-15, 2000. The meeting is open to the public and will be held at the 
Hilton Arlington Hotel, 950 N. Stafford Street, Arlington, VA 22203. 
The purpose of the meeting is to: (1) review the response to the 
panel's recommendations from its May 2000

[[Page 61149]]

meeting; (2) review and comment on data and information provided by the 
Department of Defense Domestic Dependent Elementary and Secondary 
Schools; and (3) establish subcommittees as necessary. Persons desiring 
to attend the meeting or desiring to make oral presentations or submit 
written statements for consideration by the panel must contact Dr. 
David V. Burket at (703) 696-4354, extension 1455.

    Dated: October 10, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-26411 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
EXHIBIT 10

Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-18 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-18 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-18 Filed 03/05/21 Page 3 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-18 Filed 03/05/21 Page 4 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-18 Filed 03/05/21 Page 5 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-18 Filed 03/05/21 Page 6 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-18 Filed 03/05/21 Page 7 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-18 Filed 03/05/21 Page 8 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-18 Filed 03/05/21 Page 9 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-18 Filed 03/05/21 Page 10 of 10
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rodobo International, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Yanbin Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  December 21, 2010
By:
/s/ Yanbin WangName: Yanbin WangTitle:  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer