Stack Analysis, 

Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

1400 S. Mahoning Ave. 

Alliance, Ohio 44601 

Report 

Performed Velocity, Temperature, Moisture, Particulate, Sulfur Dioxide, 

Hydrochloric Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid, Chlorine and Mercury Emissions Testing 

Sampling performed on the Swindel Kiln Outlet 

P004 

Alliance, OH 44601 

Test Date: 09/20/2011 & 09/21/2011 
Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

1400 S. Mahoning Ave. 

Alliance, Ohio 44601 

Performed Velocity, Temperature, Moisture, Particulate, Sulfur Dioxide, Hydrochloric Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid, Chlorine and Mercury Emissions Testing 

Sampling performed on the Swindel Kiln Outlet 

P004 

Alliance, OH 44601 

Test Date: 09/20/2011 & 09/21/2011 

•ustom Stack Analysis, LLC. 
REPORT CERTIFICATION 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. has used its professional experience and best 

professional efforts in performing this compliance test. have reviewed the results of 

these tests and to the best of my knowledge and belief they are true and correct. 

•)atee..s /.•.i. K. Gray 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cenfield St NI,• Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330-525-7908 E-mail: stacks@,customstackanalysL•,.com 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. conducted emissions sampling using USEPA 

Methods 1-5, 8 & 29. Testing was conducted for velocity, temperature, moisture, particulate, sulfur dioxide, hydrochloric acid, hydrofluoric acid, chlorine and mercury 

emissions on September 20 th and 21 st, 2011. The testing was conducted for 

compliance purposes. The Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. test crew consisted of Mr. Jim 

Gray, Mr. Joe Crowe, Mr. Jeff Pittman, and Mr. Carlos Javier. The testing procedures 

were coordinated by Mr. John Miller from Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company. All 

testing procedures were witnessed by Mrs. Jana Gannon of the Ohio EPA Northeast 

District. 

Pollutant Average Test Result 

Particulate 3.75 Ibs/hr 

Sulfur Dioxide 48.13 Ibs/hr 

Hydrochloric Acid 0.076 Ibs/hr 

Hydrofluqric Acid 1.050 Ibs/hr 

Chlorine 0.077 Ibs/hr 

Mercury 6.19 10 .4 Ibs/hr 

A description of the testing protocol is included on pages 5-9. All testing calculations are located on pages 14-16. Appendix 1 includes field test data. Appendix 2 contains laboratory data from Custom Stack Analysis, LLC and Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. Appendix 3 contains calibration data for the equipment used on test day. 

Appendix 4 contains process data. Test results are located on pages 2-4. 

Custom Stack AnalysL•', LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cenfield St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone." 330-525-5119 l•'ax." 330-525-7908 E-mail: stacks@cu.•'tomstackanalysL•., corn 

Page 1 
Test Results 

9/20/2011 

PM/SO2 

Run #1. Run #2 Run #3 

Stack Gas Velocity (ft/sec) 35.41 32.84 31.27 

Standard Cubic Feet an Hour 742,575 703,817 659,643 

Actual Cubic Feet.per Minute 23,113 21,440 20,414 

Stack Temperature (F) 390 381 384 

Moisture % (Measured) 10.66% 9.79% 10.88% 

Moisture % (Saturated) 1454.26% 1319.21% 1354,09% 

Isok|nicity % 100.23% 101.38% 103.22% 

Carbon Dioxide % 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 

Oxygen % 17.00% 17.00% 17.00% 

Nitrogen % 80.00% 80.00% 80.00% 

Particulate (Ibslhr) 3,87 3.26 4.14 3,75 

Particulate (Ibsldscf) 5.21176E-06 4.62682E-06 6.27238E-06 5o37033E-06 

Particulate (grldscf) 0.03648 0.03239 0,04391 0.03759 

SO2 (Ibslhr) 

S02 (Ibsldscf) 

47.71 46.46 50.21 48.13 

6.43E-05 6.60E-05 7.61 E-05 6.88E-05 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O, Box 3750 14614 CenfieM St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330-525-7908 E-mall: stacks@customstackanalysls.Com 

Page 2 
Test Results 

Mercury 

9/21/2011 

Run #1 Run #2 Run #3_ Stack Gas Veloclty (ffJsec) 34.29 34,66 34.48 

Standard Cubic Feet an Hour 708,534 722,830 724,535 

Actual Cubic Feet per Minute 22,388 22,626 22,507 

Stack Temperature (F) 382 383 379 

Moisture % (Measured) 12.92% 11.85% 11.73% 

Isoklnlclty % 99.97% 100,70% 98.91% 

Carbon Dioxide % 3,00% 3,00% 3.00% 

Oxygen % 17.00% 17.00% 17.00% 

Nitrogen % 80.00% 80,00% 80.00% 

Mercur• (mgldscm) 0.014 0,006 0.020 0.014 

Mercuw (Ibslhr) 6.41E-04 2o89E-04 9.26E-04 6.19E-04 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cenfield St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330-525-7908 E-mall: stacks@customstackanalysis.Com 

Page 3 
Stack Gas Velocity (ft/sec) 

Standard Cubic Feet an Hour 

Actual Cubic Feet per Minute 

Stack Temperature (F) 

Moisture % (Measured) 

Isokinlcity % 

Carbon Dioxide % 

Oxygen % 

Nitrogen % 

Hydrochloric Acid (Ibslhr) 

Hydrochloric Acid (Ibsldscf) 

Hydrochloric Acid (ppm) 

Chlorine (Ibalhr) 

Chlodne (Ibsldscf) 

Chlorine (ppm) 

Hydrofluoric acid (Ibslhr) 

Hydrofluoric acid (Ibeldscf) 

Hydrofluoric acid (ppm) 

Test Results 

HCL/C2/HF 

9/21/2011 

Run #1 Run #2 Run #•3 • 

33.04 34.87 33.82 

670,887 726,468 708,960 

21.566 22,765 22,076 

385 382 376 

14.06% 12.03% 12.20% 

105.07% 102,02% 101.24% 

3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 

17.00% 17.00% 17.00% 

80.00% 80.00% 80.00% 

0.072 0.074 0.083 0.076 

1.07E-07 1.02E-07 1.17E-07 1.09E-07 

1.13 1.08 1.25 1.15 

0.002 0.004 0.003 0.003 

2.52E-09 5.33E-09 4.76E-09 4.20E-09 

0.014 0.029 0.026 0.023 

0.962 1.039 1.148 1.050 

1.43E-06 1.43E-06 1.62E-06 1.49E-06 

27.7 27.7 '31.3 28.9 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cenfield St NIi Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330-525-7908 F.-mail: stacks@customstackanalysis.com 

Page 4 
METHOD 1 

Sample and velocity traverses for stationary sources. To aid in the 

representative measurement of pollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow rate 

from a stationary source, a measurement site where the effluent stream is flowing in a 

known direction is selected, and the cross-section of the stack is divided into a number 

of equal areas. A traverse point is then located within each of the•e equal areas. 

METHOD 2 

Determination of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate. The average gas 

velocity in a stack is determined from the gas density and from measurement of the 

average velocity head with a Type S (Sta, usscheibe or reverse type) pitot tube. 

METHOD 3 

Gas analysis for the determination of dry molecular weight. This method is 

applicable for determining carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations and dry molecular 

weight of a sample from a gas stream of a fossil-fuel combustion p,rocess. 

METHOD 4 

Determination of moisture content'in stack gases. A gas sample is extracted at a 

constant rate from the source. It is determined either volumetrically or gravimetrically. 

Custom Stack Analy.•is, LLC P. O. Box 3750 14614 C¢J•fieM St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330-525-7908 E-mail: stacks@cuslomstaekanalysig,com 

Page 5 
METHOD 8 TESTING DESCRIPTION 

Sulfur Dioxide and Particulate Matter samples were collected following EPA 

Methods 1-5 & 8. The equipment used for testing consisted of a Custom Stack Analysis 

Sampling Apparatus (EPA type). A type "S" pitot and a heated sampling probe were 

used with the sampling train. All equipment was calibrated in the laboratory prior to the 

test. The sampling nozzle and the pitot tubes were measured on the day of the test. All 

calibrations can be found in the appendix. The dust laden gases are passed through a 

pyrex probe. The first and third impingers were the standard Greenburg-Smith type and 

the second and fourth one were a modified Greenburg-Smith type. The first impinger 

contained 100 ml of 80% isopropanol. The gases leaving the first impinger are passed 

through a four inch filter holder containing Gelman Type A-E fiberglass filter media. The 

second and third impinger contained 100 ml of 3% Hydrogen Peroxide. The fourth 

impinger is used as a dry trap. After leaving the fourth impinger the gases passed 

through a "Drierite" column containing about 500 grams of calcium ,sulfate (CaSO4) 

desicant to remove any remaining.water vapor.- The dry gas then passed through the 

hose portion of the umbilical cord to an Custom Stack Analysis Sampling Apparatus. In 

the module the gas was moved through the system by a leakless air pump to a 

Rockwell 175-S dry test meter. The dry t6st meter exhausted to a calibrated orifice to 

measure the flow rate of the gases passing through the sampling apparatus. A type "S" 

pitot tube was attached to the sheath of the heated probe and nozzle. The orifice 

pressure taps and the pitot tube were connected to a Dwyer duel i0 inch combination 

inclined-well type manometer. One half of the manometer measured the orifice 

differential pressure (^H) and the other half measured the flue gas velocity head (^P). 

The temperature of the flue gas was measured by a type "K" thermocouple connected 

to a Marlin Digital Temperature Indicator. 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 (•enfield St NE Alliance Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330.525-7908 l,.Lmail: s/acks@customstackanalysL•.. 

Page 6 
METHOD 26A TESTING DESCRIPTION 

Samples were collected following EPA Method 26A. The equipment used for 

testing consisted of a Custom Stack Analysis Sampling Apparatus (EPA type). A type 

"S" pitot and a heated sampling probe was used with the sampling train. All equipment 

was calibrated in the laboratory prior to the test. The sampling nozzle and the pitot 

tubes were measured on the day of the test. All calibrations can be found in the 

appendix. The gases are passed througl• a heated pyrex probe an•i a heated glass four 

inch filter holder containing Pallflex TX40H145 filter media. The gases leaving the filter 

were collected in a series of six impingers packed in ice. The first, second and third 

impinger shall be of the Greensburg-Smith design with a standard tip. The first two 

impingers contained 100 ml of 0.1 N H2SO4. The next impinger contained 100 ml of 0.1 

N NaoH and the last impinger was left empty. After'passing through the fourth impinger the gases pass through a "Drierite" column containing about 500 grams of calcium 

sulfate (CaSO4) desicant to remove the remaining water vapor. The dry gas then 

passed through the hose portion of the umbilical cord to a Custom Stack Analysis Model 

#3000 stack sampling module. In the module the gas was moved through the system by 

a leakless air pump to a Rockwell 175-S dry test meter. The dry test meter exhausted to 

a calibrated orifice to measure the flow rate of the gases passing through the sampling 

apparatus. A type "S" pitot tube was attached to the sheath of the heated probe and 

nozzle. The orifice pressure taps and the pitot tube were connected to a Dwyer dual 10 

inch combination inclined-well type manometer. One half of the manometer measured 

the orifice differential pressure (^H) and, the other half measured the flue gas velocity head (^P). The temperature of the flue gas was measured by a type "K" thermocouple 

connected to a Marlin Digital Temperature Indicator. The C02 and 02 levels were 

determined using a Fyrite. 

Sample recovery was performed according to USEPA Method 26A section 6.2. 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 C.et!fieM St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330-525-7908 E-mail: stacks@cttstomstuckanalysis.com 

Page 7 
METHOD 29 TESTING DESCRIPTION 

Samples were collected following EPA Method 29. Each point was sampled for 

10 minutes for a total of a 120 minute test. The equipment used for testing consisted of 

a Burrell Model B orsat analyzer and a Alliance Pollution Control Stack Train Sampler 

(EPA type). A type "S" pitot and a heated sampling probe was used with the sampling 

train. All equipment was calibrated in the laboratory prior to the test. The sampling 

nozzle and the pitot tubes were measured on the day of the test. All calibrations can be 

found in the appendix. The gases are passed through a heated pyrex probe and a 

heated glass four inch filter holder containing Gelman Type A-E fiberglass filter media. 

The gases leaving the filter were collected in a series of six impingers packed in ice. 

The first, second, fourth, fifth, and sixth impingers were the modified Greenburg-Smith 

type and the third one was .a standard Greenburg-Smith type. The first impinger is left 

empty. The second and third impinger'contained 100 ml each of HNO3/ H202. The 

gases then pass through the fourth impinger which is left empty. After leaving the fourth 

impinger the gases passed through a fifth and sixth impinger containing 100 ml each of 

acidified KMnO4. They then pass through a "Drierite" column containing about 500 

grams of calcium sulfate (CaSO4) desicant to remove any remaining water vapor. The 

dry gas then passed through the hose portion of the umbilical cord to an Alliance 

Pollution Control "Stack Sampler" module. In the module the gas was moved through 

the system by a leakless air pump to a Rockwell 175-S dry test meter. The dry test 

meter exhausted to a calibrated orifice to measure the flow rate of the gases passing 

through the sampling apparatus. A type "S" pitot tube was attached to the sheath of the 

heated probe and nozzle. The orifice pressure taps and the pitot tube were connected 

to a Dwyer dual 10 inch combination inclined-well type manometer. One half of the 

manometer measured the orifice differential pressure (^H) and the other half measured 

the flue gas velocity head (^P). The temperature of the flue gas was measured by a type 

"K" thermocouple connected to a Marlin digital temperature controller. The C02 and 02 

levels were collected into teddlar bags,and brought back to the laboratory for orsat 

analysis. Sampling train recovery was conducted as follows: Container No. 1 contained 

the filter. Container No. 3 contained the probe nozzle, probe fitting, probe liner, and front 

half of the filter holder with 100 ml of 0.1 N HNO3. Container No. 4 consisted of 

impingers 1 through 3, connecting glassware and back half of filter holder being rinsed 

with 100 ml of 0.1 N HNO3. Container No. 5A was the fourth impinger being rinsed with 

100 ml of 0.1 N HNO3. Container No. 5B consisted of the fifth and sixth impinger with 

acidified KmnO4 being rinsed three times with a total of 100 ml of acidified KmnO4. They 

are then rinsed with 100 ml of water. Container No. 

Cttstom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Ce/•field St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 l'hone: 330-525-5l 19 I•?tx: 330-525'-7908 E-mail: stacks@customstackanalysis.com 

Page 8 
METHOD 29 TESTING DESCRIPTION CONT. 

5C was the fifth and sixth impinger being rinsed with 25ml of 8 N HCL to remove any 

remaining deposits. The container is initially filled with 200 ml of water. Container No. 6 

contains the spent calcium sulfate. Cont, ainer No. 8A contained 300 ml of 0.1 N Nitric 

acid solution used in the sample recovery. Container No. 8B contained 100 ml of 

distilled water used in the sample recovery. Container No. 9 contained 200 ml of fresh 

Hn03/H202 solution that was used in the impingers. Container No. 10 contained 100 ml 

of fresh acidified potassium permanganate solution. Container No. 11 contained 200 ml 

of distilled water plus 25 ml of 8N HCL. Container No. 12 contained 3 unused blank 

filters from the same lot as the sampling filters. 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cen.fieM St NF. Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330-525-7908 E-mail: .•'tacks@customstackanalysis.com 

Page 9 
8 Sampling System 

(Following the procedures in USEPA Method 6 section 6.1.1 for particulate collection) 

TEMPERATURE SENSOR 

./• 

IMPINGER TRAIN OPTIONAL, MAY • REPLACED 

•" • 

BY AN EQUIVALENT CONDENSER 

PITOT TUBE 

i' ST^CKWALL THERMOMErER 

TEMPERATURE HEATED AREA 

SENSOR 

\ PROBE ",, '-• 

\, --•'m----• 

MOMETER 

--• L.J / --.• i_ ,T. CHEC•V•.VE 

•-iZ::•:: • ••.:----•: •: ':•.11• 

• r------J| FILTER {;l•j •.j (,,• VACUUM 

REVERSE'TYPE !1 I•, .'--E---•l HOLDER 

MANOMETER 

L 

ORIFICE 

L 

ORIFICE 

MANOMETER 

THERMOMETERS 

IMPiNGER$ 

•RYPASS MAIN VACUUM 

VALVE VALVE (•') GAUGE 

AIR 

PUMP 

LINE 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cenfield St HE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330-525-7908 E-mail: ,•'tacks@customstackanalysis.com 

Page 10 
26A Sampling System 

O•ic¢ Fi•e "• 

•omct=" Mere" • 

Custom Stack AnalysL•', LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 C.enfield St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330-525-7908 E-maih stacks@c:ustomstackanalysis.com 

Page 11 
29 Sampling System 

Glass Probe 

Temperature 

Sensor 

Glass Probe 

Liner 

Glass Filter 

Holder 

Heated Area 

Manometer 

Odfice 

B•-pnss Main 

alve Valve 

Alr-l"ight 

Pump 

Temperature 

Gauge 

Line 

Custom Stack AnalysL•', LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 CenfieM St HE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330-525-7908 E-mail: stacks@customstackanalysis.com 

Page 12 
Sampling Point Locations 

• • • • 

• • • • 

• • • • 

• • • • 

• • • • 

Location Outlet 

Upstream 69.5" 

Downstream 237" 

Stack Diameter 43.5 X 36 Inches 

Stack Point # 1 4.4 Inches 

2 13.1 

3 21.8 

4 30.5 

5 39.2 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 17. O. Box 3750 14614 Cet!l•eld St NE Alliance, Ohto 4460l Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330-525-7908 E-mail: xtacks@cuxtomstackanalysi.•.com 

Page 13 
CALCULATIONS 

Outlet 

RUN #•1 RUN #2 _RUN #3 

1. Vm (std) 37.00 35.47 33.85 VM 17.64 PBAR + 13.6 Y 

Tm 

Vm (std) Volume of gas collected, corrected to standard conditions, cult. 

Vm Volume of gas sampled at meter box, cuft 

17.64 Standard temperature, 528 Rankine st, d pressure, 29.92. 

Tm Average dry gas meter temperature, 460 Rankine. 

Pbar Barometric pressure, inches of mercury (Hg) 

^H Average pressure differential across orifice. 

13,6 Specific gravity of mercury. 

Y Calibration factor of meter box. 

RUN #1 RUN#2 RUN #3 

37.00 35.47 33.85 

38.57 37.20 35,80 

17.64 17.64 17.64 

532.55 536.6 540.5 

28.85 28.91 28.88 

1.467 1.2955 1.165 

13.6 13.6 13.6 

RUN #I _RUN #2 RUN #__3 

Vw (std) 4.42 3.85 4.13 

VIc 

P H20 

M H20 

R 

Tstd 

Pstd 

K2 

Volume of water and silica colected. 

Density of water, 0.002201 Ib/ml. 

Molecular weight of water, 18.01 Ib/Ib-mole. 

Ideal gas constant, 21.85 in..hg ft3/R-Ib-mole. 

Standard absolute temperature, 528 R. 

Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 in. Hg. 

0.0471 ft3 ml. 

VIc P H20 

Mh20 

RTstd K2 Vie 

Pstd 

.RUN #1 RUN #____•2 _RUN #3 

93.7 81.7 87.7 

0.002201 0.002201 0.002201 

18,01 18.01 18.01 

21.85 21.85 21.85 

528 528 528 

29.92 29.92 29.92 

0.0471 0.0471 0.0471 

3. BWS 

Bw$ 

Vw(std) 

Vm(std) 

4. Md 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 

RUN #._._.._•1 RUN #•2 _RUN #3 

0.1066154 0.0979091 0.108813 

Water vapor in the gas stream, proportion. 

Volume of water vapor in the gas sample, scf. 

Volume of gas sampled at meter box, scf. 

_RUN #1 RUN #....•_.•2 RUN #_.__.__•3 

29.16 29.16 29.16 

Md Dry molecular weight, Ib Ib-mole. 

0.44 Molecular weight of CO2 divided by 100. 

0.32 Molecular weight of O2 divided by 100. 

0.28 Molecular weight of N2 or CO divided by 100. 

Co2, 02, N2, and CO are in percent by volume, dry basis. 

Vw(std) 

Vm(std)+ Vw(std)I 

RUN#1 RUN#2 RUN#3 

0.1066154 0.0979091 0.108813 

4.42 3.85 4.13 

37.00 35.47 33.85 

10.44 (%CO2) +, 0.32 (%O2) + 0.28 (%N2) %CO) 

RUN #_1 RUN #2 RUN #3 

29.16 29.16 29.16 

0.44 0,44 0.44 

0.32 0.32 0.32 

0.28 0.28 0.28 

P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cenfield St NF, Alliance. Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330.525-7908 E-tnail: stacks@customstackanalysis.com 

Page 14 
5o 

Ms 

Ms 

M H20 

RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 

27.97 28.07 27.95 

Molecular weight of gas, wet basis, Ib/Ib-mole. 

Molecular weight of water, 18 Ib Ib-mole. 

RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 

V$ 35.41 32,84 31.27 

Vs Average stack gas velocity, ft sec. 

85,49 Pitot tube constant, ft /sec. 

Cp Pitot tube coefficient, dimensionless, 

^P Velocity head of stack gas, avg, sq rt. 

Ts Temperature of stack gas, 460 (Rankine). 

Ps Absolute stack gas pressure, barometric static, 

Ms Molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis. 

RUN #1 RUN #•2 R__UN #3 

ACFM 23113.293 21440.242 20413.602 

Y$ 

Isokiniclty 

K4 

Ts 

Vmstd 

Ps 

Vs 

An 

Min. 

Bws 

Average stack gas velocity, ft sec. 

RUN #1 _RUN #2 RUN #3 

100.2267 101.38068 103.21538 

0,09450 for English units. 

Stack temperature •60 R. 

Volume of gas collected, scf. 

Stack pressure, inches Hg. 

Stack velocity, ft /sec. 

Area of the sampling nozzle, cuff. 

Minutes of test. 

Water vapor in the gas.stream, propo•ion, 

IMd (l-Bws) + M H20 (Bws) 

RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 

27.97 28,07 27.95 

18 18 18 

85.49 

--v Ps Ms 

RUN#1 RUN #2 RUN #3 

35.41 32.84 31,27 

85.49 85.49 85.49 

0.84 0.84 0.84 

0.4805549 0.4491937 0.4-259911 

849.65 841.4 843.55 

28.86 28.92 28.89 

27.97 28.07 27.95 

IStackAraa 60 Vs 

RUN #_.__..•1 R__UN #2 RUN #3 

35.41 32.84 31.27 

Ps 

K4 Ts Vmstd 

Vs An Min (1-Bws) 

RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 

0.0945 0.0945 0.0945 

849.65 841,4 843.55 

37.00 35.47 33,85 

28.86 28.92 28.89 

35.41 32.84 31.27 

0.0005412 0.0005412 0.0005412 

60 60 60 

0.1066154 0.0979091 0.108813 

Custom Stack Analysis, I,LC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cen.field St NF. Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330-525-7908 E-mail: s/acks@cu.•'tomstackanalysis.com 

Page 15 
RUN #1 

Lbs/Hr 3.87' 

2,205 E-E 

Mn 

scfh 

Vm std 

RUN #1. 

GrlDscf 0.0364825 

0.0154 

Vm std 

Mn 

RUN #1 

SCFH 742575.38 

3600 

Bws 

A 

Ts• 

Ps• 

Ts 

PS 

VS 

RUN #2 RUN #•3 

3.26 4.14 

Conversion from mg to lbs. 

2,205 

Weight gain of filter and wash minus blank. 

Standard stack volumetric flow rate, 

Volume of air sampled, at s, tp, 

Mn 

E-6 scfh 

Vm std 

RUN #•1 RUN #2_ RUN #3 

2,205 E-6 2.205 E-6 2.205 E-6 

87.65 74.6 96.5 

742575.38 703817.13 659643.43 

37.00 35.47 33.85 

RUN #2 RUN #_..___•3 

0.0154 

Mn 

0.0323877 0.0439066 *• 

Vmstd 

Conversion to grains from mg. 

Volume of air sampled at stp. 

RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 

0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 

Weight gain of filter and wash minus blank. 

37.00 35.47 33.85 

87.65 74.6 96.5 

RUN #__2 RUN #__3 

703817.13 659643,43 

Tstd Ps 

3600 (1 Bws Vs A *---- 

Ts Pstd 

RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN_• 

Seconds per hour. 3600 3600 3600 

Watervapor in the gas stream, proportion. 0.1066154 0.0979091 0.108813 

Area of stack in sq ft. 10.88 10.88 10.88 

Standard absolute temperature, 528 R. 528 528 528 

Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 in. Hg. 29.92 29.92 29,92 

Temperature of stack gas, 460 (Rankine), 849.65 841.4 843.55 

Absolute stack gas pressure, barometric + static. 28.85 28.91 28.88 

Average stack gas velocity, ft /sec, 35.41 32.84 31.27 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cen.field St NE Alliance, O, hio 44601 P/tone: 330-525-5119 Fax: 330-525-7908 E-maih stack.•.@customstackanalysis.com 

Page 16 
Test Data 
TEST DATA 

COMPANY NAME 

ADDRESS 

CITY Dover 

STATE OH 

ZIP •6103 

TEST METHODS Methos 1-4 

CREW MEMBERS ,|eft P,Joe C 

LOCATION Outlet 

SOURCE P004 Outlet 

CONTROL 

Whitacre- Creer Fireproofin• P004 Outlet 

2411 State Route 516 NW 

]Bashouse 

RUN#1 RUN#2 RUN#3 

DATE 

TIME 

RUN LENGTH (min) 

VOLUME (cubic feet) 

Y FACTOR 

BAROMETRIC 

METER TEMP. (R) 

STACK TEMP. (R) 

AVERAGE ^P 

AVERAGE ^H 

IMPINGER VOLUME 

PITOTCOEF. 

STATIC PRESSURE 

STACK AREA 

NOZZLE SlZE(sq/ff) 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

OXYGEN 

NITROGEN 

WEIGHTS 

INITIALPROBE#1 

POST PROBE#1 

TOTAL 

INITIAL PROBE #2 

POST PROBE #2 

TOTAL 

AVG Probe Weight 

INITIAL FILTER #t 

POST FILTER #1 

TOTAL 

INITIAL FILTER #2 

POST FILTER #2 

TOTAL 

AVG Filter Weight 

9/20/2011 9/20/2011 9/20/2011 

"8:55-9:59 10:37-11:43 12:32-13:36 

60 60.00 60.00 

38.573 37.20 35.804 

28.85 28.9'1 28.88 

532.55 536.60 540.50 

849.65 841.40 843.55 

0.48 0.45 0.43 

1.30 1.17 

81.70 87.70 

1.47 

93.70 

0.84 0.84 0.84 

0.10 0.10 0.10 

10.88 10.88 10.88 

0.0005412 0.000541 0.000541 

3.00 3.00 

17.00 17.00 17.00 

80 80 80 

3.00 

117027.1 119427.4 100994.8 

119453.2 101043.1 

57.6 

117057.1 

30 25.8 48.3 

117027 119427.3 100994.8 

1t7057.t 119453.2 101043.1 

30.1 25.9 48.3 

30.05 25.85 48.3 

20101.0 20474 20103.9 

20158.6 20522.7 20152.1 

57.6 48.7 48.2 

20101 20473.9 20103.9 

20158.6 20522.7 20152.1 

57.6 48.8 48.2 

48.75 48.2 
TEST,RESULTS 

OUTLET 

RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 

VM (std) 

VW (std) 

BWS (measured) 

MD 

MS 

VS (ft/sec) 

SCFH 

ACFM 

DCFM 

ISOKINETIC % 

PARTICULATE 

LBS/HR 

G•DSCF 

LBS/DSCF 

37.00 35.47 33.85 

4.42 3.85 4.13 

0.107 0.098 0.109 

29.16 29.16 29.16 

27.97017207 28.06733409 27.9456472 

35.41 32.84 31.27 

742575.3812 703817.1293 659643.431 

23113.29346 21440.2425 20413.602 

12376.25635 11730.28549 10994.0572 

t00.2267001 101.380682 103.215384 

3.870142536 3.256432577 4.13753185 

0.036482488 0.032387714 0.04390663 

5.21178E-06 4.62682E-06 6.27238E-06 

Vm (std) Volume of gas sampled at standard conditions. 

Vw (std) Volume of water vapor collected at standard conditions. 

Bws Stack moisture content. 

Md Determination of dry molecular weight of stack gas. 

Ms Determination of stack gas molecular weight. 

Vs Average gas stack velocity. (ftJsec.) 

ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute of gas velocity. 

DCFM Dry standard cubic feet per minute of gas velocity. 

L:r;IDII;:2;•II iii •°:•iandard Cubic feet. 
TEST DATA 

OUTLET 

RUN #t RUN #2 RUN #3 

METHOD 8 

Vtb (ml) 

Vt (ml) 

Vsoln 

Va 

N 

0.1 0.1 0.1 

33.5 

1000 

33 

1000 

36.3 

1000 

10 10 10 

0.01008 0.01008 0.01008 

Vtb Volume of barium perchlorata titrant used for the blank, ml. 

Vt Volume of barium perchlorate t!trant used for the sample, ml (average or rdpli• 

Vsoln Total volume of solution in which the sulfur dioxide sample is contained, 

Va Volume of sample aliquot titrated, ml. 

N Normality of barium perchlorate titrant, milliequivalentJml. 

TEST RESULTS 

OUTLET 

RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 

METHOD 8 

SO2 (Lbs/DSCF) 

SO2 (Lbs/Hr) 

6.42518E-05 6.6015tE-05 7.6123E-05 

47.71177452 46.46256953 50.2142141 

Cso2 7.061"10-5 

(Vt-Vtb)(Vsoln/Va)*N 

Vm(std) 

Cso2 Concentration of sulfur dioxide, dry basis corrected to standard conditions 
Run 

Whitacre- Crecr Fireproofing- PO04 Outlet 

MeterBox,d: MB-18 ProbelO 4p-I Cold 

Test Date 9/20/2011 

Observer: Jana Gannon Northeast District 

10.88 28.85 O.lO 28.86 

Avg. Ts F CO2 Fco= 02 N2+C 

390 3.00 17.00 80.00 

Md Ms 

29.]6 28.04 

Bws S Bws 

0.107 •4.543 

IAssumed Bws: 10.000 

PitotCk 

OK 

1.0000 2,004 0.84 38,573 93.70 72.55 36.999 4.410 

0.48 35.36 13,$35 23,083 

Qsd dscfl• Points Dn 

7.42E+05 20 0.315 

Total Test time Time @ point 

60 3.00 

Leak Ck 

0.999 6"(•0 

Avg. DIh Test Time 

1.467000 8:55-9:59 

TRUE 

Time Point No. Me•r •0 dl "p" ITarget dl "h' Actual dl "h" Ts F F 

0.00 397.44 0.19 1.20 1.20 374 70 

3.00 399.160 0.21 1.32 1.30 378 70 

6.00 401.130 0.20 1.25 1.30 383 71 

9.00 403.020 0,22 1,37 1,40 385 71 

12.00 404.950 0.15 0.94 0.94 383 71 

15.00 406.550 0.19 1.20 1.20 375 71 

18.00 408.310 0.22 1.37 1.40 386 72 

21.00 410.260 0.25 1.56 1.60 389 72 

24.00 412.390 0.26 1.61 1.60 391 72 

27.00 414.460 0.26 1,61 1.60 394 72 

30•0 416.140 &21 1.18 1.20 484 73 

33.00 417.930 0.23 1.43 1.40 393 73 

36.00 419,$70 0.24 1.49 1.50 394 73 

39.00 421,850 0.25 1.55 1.60 396 73 

42.00 423.790 0.27 1.67 1.70 396 74 

45.00 425,830 0.18 1.13 1.10 383 74 

48.00 427.480 0.20 1.26 1.30 380 74 

51•0 429.220 0;27 1.6• 1.70 392 75 

54.00 431.270 0.26 1.62 1.60 392 75 

57.00 433.610 0.41 2.71 2.70 345 75 

60.00 436.017 

XAD Cond Temp F FilterTemp F ProbeTemp F Vacuum 

61 248 261 

50 248 260 

45 249 261 

44 249 260 

43 247 261 

42 248 264 

43 247 •62 

43 249 262 

44 249 262 

45 250 262 

45 249 261 

46 247 262 

48 248 264 

49 251 265 

48 248 264 

48 248 265 

49 250 263 

50 247 262 

51 246 260 

51 250 264 

Imp. Liquid Collected 

Wt. (end) Wt. (start) 

568.7 577.9 

679.0 633.2 

601,7 580.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

888.6 853.2 

Isoklnetics 100.3 

Test Date 912012011 

-9.2 

45.8 

21.7 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

35.4 

Page 
Run 2 

pO04 Outlet 

Y •"' ce Vmcf Vie [Av•.TmF Vmstd Vwstd 

1.0000 2.004 0.84 37.201 81.70 76.60 35"4711 3.846 

Avg. Sqrt # Sample 

Dip v, sefm wet aefm Qsd dsefh Points Dn 

o..9 32.86 13,o09 21,449 7.04E+051 20 0.315 

TRUE 

Time Point No. Meter(c 0 dl "p" Target AH Actual dl AH TsF tm F (in) XAD 

0.00 446,469 0.15 0.95 0.95 377 74 

3.00 448,250 0.12 0.76 0.76 382 74 

6.00 449.680 0.17 1.07 I. 10 383 74 

9.00 451.370 0,19 1.19 1.20 387 74 

12.00 453.160 0,20 1.25 1.30 388 75 

1£,00 454.950 0.19 1.21 1.20 375 75 

18.00 456,810 0.22 1.38 1.40 386 75 

21.00 458.730 0.20 1.25 1.30 390 76 

24.00 460.490 0.23 1.43 1.40 393 76 

27.00 462.380 0.25 1.56 1.60 395 76 

30.00 464.330 0.20 1.26 1.30 388 77 

33.00 466.250 0.27 1.70 1.70 385 77 

36.00 468.270 0.26 1.64 1.60 387 78 

39.00 470.420 0•22 1.41 A0 372 78 

42.00 472,330 0,25 1.60 1.60 377 78 

45.00 474.510 0.16 1.03 1.00 370 79 

48.00 2 476.220 0.19 1.22 1.20 370 79 

51.00 477.970 0.20 1.28 1.30 374 79 

54.00 479.920 0.21 1.35 1.40 375 79 

57.00 481.830 0.19 1.22 1.20 374 79 

60.00 0 483.670 

Test Date 9/20/2011 

EPA Observer: Jana Gannon Northeast District 

N2+C Md 

80.00 29.16 

Bws S Bws 

0.098 13.192 0.999 

Assumed Bws: 10.000 

Total Test time Time @ point 

60 3.00 

Ms Pitot Ck 

28.04 OK 

Leak Ck 

@.003 

1.295500 

Cond Temp F Filter Temp F Probe Temp F Vacttum 

52 246 263 

46 248 262 

43 248 260 

42 250 263 

40 249 266 3 

39 251 267 

39 247 266 3 

41 249 264 

42 250 268 3 

42 246 262 

43 249 266 

44 251 262 

46 247 268 

50 249 269 

51 246 267 

47 247 264 

48 245 266 

SO 252 263 

52 256 261 

51 260 26£ 

Imp. Liquid Collected 

Wt. (end Wt. (start) Ic 

604.9 620.2 -I 5.3 

619,5 588.4 31.1 

616.0 588.2 27.8 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

905.5 867.4 38.1 

lsokinetles 101.3 

Test Date 9/20/201 

3 

3 

Page 
Run 3 

Creer Fireprpofln•- p004 Outlet 

•ox Id: MB-18 Probe ID 4p-I Cold BoxlD: 10 

As ft^2 Pbar P' Av,.TsF O' 

•o.s• :•.s• •.•0 :•.•9 3•. 3.00 •.00 

Loooo •.004 0.•4 •.s04 s?.•o •0.•0 33.•4• 4. 28 

TRUE 

Time Point No. Meter 

0.00 497.43 

3.00 499.120 

6,00 500.810 

9.00 502.570 

12.00 504.220 

15.00 506.190 

18.00 2 507.920 

21.00 509.770 

24.00 511.690 

27.00 513.540 

30.00 515.610 

33.00 517.390 

36.00 519,310 

39.00 521.330 

42.00 523.380 

45.00 525.330 

48.00 526,920 

51.00 528,520 

54.O0 530,140 

57.00 531.620 

60.00 533.235 

dl"p" target dl"h" Actual dl"h' Ts F tmF(in) 

0.16 1,04 I.O0 361 78 

0.15 0.97 0,97 363 78 

0.17 1.09 1.10 372 78 

0,14 0.90 0.90 376 79 

0,20 1.28 1.30 378 79 

0.19 1.22 1,20 371 79 

0.[r8 1.14 1.10 384 79 

0+21 1.32 1,30 390 80 

0.22 1,39 1.40 387 80 

0.25 1.58 1,60 389 81 

0.19 1.22 1.20 378 81 

0.22 1.39 1.40 388 81 

0.25 1.58 1,60 392 81 

0.24 t:52 1.50 392 82 

0.20 1,26 1.30 392 82 

0,14 0,89 0.89 384 82 

0.15 0.95 0.95 393 82 

0.14 0.88 0.88 3•3 82 

0.12 0.76 0.76 393 83 

0.15 0.95 0.95 395 83 

XAD 

Test Date 9/20/201 

Observer: Jana Gannon Northeast District 

N2+C Md Ms Pitot Ck 

80.00 29,16 28.04 OK 

Bws S Bws I•eak Ck 

0.109 13.541 0.999 60 

Assumed Bws: 0.000 

Total Test time 

60 3.00 1.165000 

Cond Temp F FilterTemp F ProbeTemp F Vacuum 

51 247 262 

47 250 264 

44 261 261 

45 262 259 3 

46 264 260 

45 265 262 

46 265 259 

46 264 265 

46 266 264 

47 263 264 

48 264 260 

50 264 263 

50 266 265 

51 263 265 

53 266 266 

54 268 269 

55 264 260 

48 265 261 

46 266 258 

47 267 261 2 

Imp. Liquid Collected 

Wt. (end• Wl. •slart) Ic 

579.9 573.0 6.9 

658.1 619.3 38.8 

603.0 596,3 6.7 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0,0 0.0 0.0 

829.8 794.5 35.3 

Isokinefics 103.4 

Test Date 9/20/201 

Page 
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 

SOURC• NAME 

ADDRESS 

CITY 

PHONE 

CONTROL EQUIPMENT 

OPERA TING MO•E 

OPERA TING MODE 

DESCRIBE EMISSION POINT 

START f•.6t' S•.[L STOP :•n'4. 

fiT. ABOVE GROUND LE•'EL tiT, RELAT/VE TO OBSERVER 

STARTA• STOP •P•"YXA. START"•.•) [ STOP •{. 

DISTANCE roOM OBSERVER DIRECTION roOM •OBSERVER 

'SESCRmE BA C/<6RouND 

BA CKGROUND COLOR 

START •J&'• STOP,• 

WIND SPEED 

START d STOP 

STOP •.,rM • 6 

:PLUME TYP E CONTINUOUS_. I7 

IF WA TER' DROPLET PLUME -'--t"9 

A TTA CHED DETACHED 

OPACITY WAS DETERMINED 

STOP 

NORTH ARROW 

ADDITIONAL INFORMA T/ON 

O•SER VAtION 

SEC 0 

MIN 

7 

•0 

15 30 

START TiME STOP TIME 

,• SE__ !' o • 

20 50 

22 52 

23 •3 

24 •4 

25 55 

26 66 

• 57 

28 58 

29 59 

30 60 

AVERAGE OPAC/TY FQ• NUMBER OF READ/NGS 

H/GHEST PERIOD • ABOVE • % WERE 

RANGE OF. OPA CITY R•4D/NGS 

•MINIMUM •AXIMUM 

OBSERVER'S NAME (PRINT) 

VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 

ADDRESS 

CITY -.. •TDTE U ZiP 

PHONE SOURCE ID NUMBER 

PROCESS EQUIPMENT OPERA TING MODE 

OPERA T/NO MODE 

STOP 

HT. RE• TIVE TO O•SERVEk 

CONTROL EQUIPMENT 

HT. ABOVE GROUND LEVEL 

START "•'•} STOP•..t't%J•. START'•• STOP 

'DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER DIRECTION FROM "OBSERVER 

OESCR/BE EMISS/•NS 

START" •'•. STOP • 

WATER DROPLETS PRESENT 

NO •.. YES 

PT.'IN THE PLUME A T WHICH 

DESCRi#E BA'CKGROUND" 

BACKGROUND COLOR 

START •J*'•f•TOP •..fY•L. 

IT WATER DROPLET PLUME 1-'•'9 

ATTACHED DETACHED• 20 

OPACITY WAS DETERMINED 

STOP •,'t• 

STOP 

SKY CONDITIONS 

START#4• STOP 

WIND SPEED 

START •/)\•ksToP 

AMBIENT TEMPERA TURE 

s ,-,.,', 4".....• Wind 

Plume & Stack<' 

WIND DmECTION 

START 5 STOP: •. 

W#T BULB TEMPt RH percent 

DRAW NORTH ARROW 

•ssion POint 

•r•ers Position 

Sun Loc•tio•e, 

ADDIT/ON•4L INFOR/•A T/ON 

6O 

STOP TIME 

,/.; • •- •. 

15 30 45 

NUMBER OF REA DINGS 

Ot• DATE START TIME 

MIN 

O0"U 

UDO 

 (gD 

49 

22 

23 

24 54 

25 55 

26 56 

2• •7 

28 58 

A VERA •E OPA CiTY FOR 

•/SHEST PERIOD •) A•OVE 0 • Ws•S O 

RANGE OF OPA CITY REA DINGS 

OBSER •ER'S NAME fPR/NTJ 

VERIFIED BY 
TEST DATA 

COMPANY NAME Whitacre-Greer Outlet Meth 26a 

ADDRESS 2411 State Route 516 NW 

CITY Dover 

,TATE OH 

ZIP 66103 

TEST METHODS Methos 1-4 

CREW MEMBERS JeffP,Joe C 

LOCATION 

SOURCE 

CONTROL 

Outlet 

Outlet Meth 26a 

la•house 

RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 

9/21/2011 9/21/2011 9/21/2011 

7:17-8:25 9:41-9:47 12:06-12:12 

60 60.00 60.00 

36.3 38.25 37.23 

28.88 28.85 28.88 

DATE 

TIME 

RUN LENGTH (min) 

VOLUME (cubic feet) 

Y FACTOR 

BAROMETRIC 

METER TEMP. (R) 

STACK TEMP. (R) 

AVERAGE ^P 

AVERAGE ^H 

IMPINGER VOLUME 

PITOTCOEF. 

STATIC PRESSURE 

STACK AREA 

NOZZLE SIZE(sq•) 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

OXYGEN 

NITROGEN 

529.30 530.15 533.30 

844.95 842.30 836.25 

0.45 0.47 0.46 

1.17 1.34 1.29 

121.70 106.90 105.20 

0.84 0.84 0.84 

0.10 0.10 0.10 

10.88 10.88 10.88 

0.0005412 0.000541 0.000541 

3.00 3.00 3.00 

17.00 17.00 17.00 

80 80 80 
TEST DATA 

OUTLET 

RUN #'1 RUN #2 RUN #3 

METHOD 26A 

•.ICL (rag) 

CHLORINE (rag) 

HF (rag) 

1.7 1,7 

0;0•1 

22.8 

1.9 

0.089 0.077 

23.9 26.2 
TEST RESULTS 

OUTLET 

RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 

VM (std) 

VW (std) 

BWS (measured) 

MD 

MS 

VS (fUsec) 

SCFH 

ACFM 

DCFM 

ISbKINETIC % 

35.04 36.84 35.68 

5.73 5.04 4.96 

0.141 0.120 0.122 

29.16 29.16 29.16 

27.59047926 27.81765723 27.7986472 

33.04 34.87 33.82 

670887,3996 726467.9832 708959.728 

21566.16667 22764.5617 22076.1938 

11181,45666 12107.79972 11815.99•5 

105.070328t 102.0167672 101.240784 

HC._•L 

LBS/HR 0.071765087 0.073913156 0.083242 

LBS/DSCF 1.0697E-07 1.01743E-07 1.17414E-07 

PPM 1.134603212 1.079159643 1.24537845 

PPM (• 7% 02 4.043842215 3.846235652 4.43865653 

CHLORINE 

LBS/HR 0.00168859 0.003869571 0.00337349 

LBS/DSCF 2.51695E-09 5.32655E-09 4.75837E-09 

PPM 0.013727572 0.029051291 0.02595238 

H..ZF 

LBS/HR 0.962496465 1.039t32022 1.14786332 

LBSIDSCF 1.43466E-06 1.43039E-06 1.61908E-06 

PPM 27.73364994 27.65105913 31,298688 

Vm (std) Volume of gas sampled at standard conditions. 

Vw (std) Volume of water vapor collected at standard conditions, 

Bws Stack moisture content. 

Md Determination of dry molecular weight of stack gas. 

Ms Determination of stack gas molecular weight. 

Vs Average gas stack velocity. (ft/sec.) 

ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute of gas velocity. 

DCFM Dry standard cubic feet per minute of gas velocity. 

LbslHr Pounds per Hour. 

GrlDscf Grains per dry standard cubic feet. 
Run 

Whilacre-Greer- Oullel Moth 26a 

Box ld: ProbelO 4P-I ColdBoxID: EPAOb 

10.88 28.88 0.10 28.89 385 3.00 17.00 80.00 

0.9990 1,941 0.84 36,300 121.70 69.30 35.007 5.728 0.141 

Assumed Bws: 

Avg. Sqrt Vs scfm acfm Qsd dscflt Points Dn Total Test llme 

0.447 32.77 12.906 21,391 6.65E+05 20 0.315 60 

Test Date 9/21/2011 

Md Ms Pitot Ck 

29.16 28.04 OK 

S Bws LeakCk 

13.763 0.999 4"@0 

10.000 

Av•. DIh Test T, ime 

3.00 1.171500 7:17-8:25 

Time (•, point 

TRUE 

Time Point No. Meter led d[ "p" Target dl "h" Actual dl "h" Ts F F lin) 

0,00 473.21 0.14 0,84 0.82 388 68 

3.00 474.760 0.24 1.47 1.40 367 68 

6.00 476.770 0.21 1.27 1.20 377 68 

9.00 478.610 0.20 1.21 1.20 380 68 

12.00 480.380 0.21 .28 1.20 377 69 

15.00 482.260 O. 13 0.79 0.77 380 69 

18.00 483.820 O. 18 1.09 I. [0 3.77 69 

2LO0 485.560 0.20 1.21 I,[0 384 69 

24.00 487.420 0.22 1.32 1,30 388 69 

27.00 489.320 0.24 1.44 1.40 388 69 

30.00 491.320 0.16 0.96 0.94 386 70 

33,00 492.830 O. 19 1, [5 1. 384 70 

36.00 494.590 0.17 1.02 1.00 388 70 

39.00 496.270 0.21 1.26 1.20 390 70 

42.00 498.230 0.24 1.44 1.40 390 70 

45.00 500.230 0.20 1.20 1.2,0 392 70 

48.00 501.960 0.23 1.38 1.30 391 70 

51.00 503.840 0.25 1.50 1.50 388 70 

54.00 505.880 0.21 |,26 1.20 390 70 

57.00 507.8 l0 O. 19 I. 13 I. 10 394 70 

60.00 509.510 

XAD Cond Temp F Fil•rTemp F Probe Temp F Vacuum 

50 257 266 

48 266 269 

48 269 269 

45 268 266 

46 269 258 

47 269 260 

47 257 258 

48 260 259 

49 263 257 

50 265 255 

46 266 258 

45 260 255 

46 262 254 

48 260 257 

47 262 259 

48 265 258 

50 266 255 

51 269 25• 

53 260 259 

54 259 264 

Imp. Liquid Collected 

Wt. (end) Wt. (start) 

620.0 564.7 55.3 

644,3 590.0 54,3 

577.9 576.8 1.1 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

845.4 834.4 11.0 

Isokinefics 105.8 

Test Date 9/21/2011 

Page 
Run 2 

Whltaere-Greer- Outlet Meth 26a 

MeterBoxld:] ProbelD 4P-I Cofd0oxlO: 15 EPAOb 

AS f'^2 Pba, Pq (static) Ps Avl[. Ts F CO2- Fcm OZ N2+C 

10.88 28.85 0.10 28.86 382 3,00 17.00 80.00 

Y AH: Cp Vm cf Vie Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws 

0.9990 1.94 0.84 38.250 106.90 70. 36.806 5.032 0.120 

Assumed Bws: 

Avg. Sqrl Sample 

Dip Vs scfmwet acfm qsddscfh Points Dn TotalTesttlmeJ 

0.474 34.73 13,708 22,673 7.24E+05 20 0,315 60 

Test Date 

Md 

29.16 

S Bws 

13,359 

I0.000 

Time (• point 

3.00 

9/21/2011 

Ms PitotCk 

28.04 OK 

Leak Ck 

0.999 6"@c004 

Avg. DIh Test Time 

1.335000 9:4'-•:47 

TRUE 

Time Point No. Meter(c0 dl "p" Target AH Actual dl AH TsF F/in 

0,00 511.910 0,22 1.33 1,30 379 69 

3.00 2 513.830 0.25 1.50 1,• 388 69 

6.00 515.920 0.21 1.26 1.20 388 69 

9.00 517.680 0.23 1,38 1.40 389 70 

12.00 519.550 0.28 1.73 1.70 367 70 

15.00 521.720 0,20 1.25 1.20 355 70 

18.00 523.490 0.25 1.52 1.50 377 70 

21.00 525,480 0.26 1.58 1,50 380 70 

24.00 527.560 0.23 1.39 1.40 381 70 

27.00 529.370 0.25 1.51 1.50 382 70 

30.00 531.420 0.19 1.16 1.10 377 70 

33.00 533.260 0.21 1,27 1.20 384 70 

36.00 534,990 0.24 1.45 1,40 385 70 

39.00 537.140 0.25 1.50 1.50 388 70 

42.00 539.220 0.24 1.45 1.40 385 7l 

45.00 541.030 0.18 1.09 1.10 38,7 71 

48.00 2 542.690 0.20 1.20 1.20 390 71 

SI.00 544.380 0.19 1.15 1.10 386 71 

54.00 4 546.270 0.22 1.32 1.30 390 71 

57.00 548.390 0.21 1.26 1.20 388 71 

60.00 0 550.160 

XAD Cond Temp F Filter Temp F Probe Temp F Vacuum Imp. Liquid Collected 

47 258 260 

44 267 261 

45 262 260 

46 268 261 

46 266 262 

45 262 264 

47 265 261 

48 264 263 

50 266 264 

49 267 261 

49 256 260 

51 261 259 

5Z 266 26 

53 262 265 

55 259 264 

56 261 267 

58 266 269 

51 263 266 

51 260 268 

52 260 265 

Wt, (end) Wt. (start) Ic 

620.0 572.0 48.0 

638.5 596,9 41.6 

3 594.1 591.8 2.3 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

890.5 875.5 15.0 

Isokinetics 102.3 

3 Test Date 9/21/20l 

3 

3 

3 

Page 
Run 3 

Whitacre-Greer- Outlet Moth 26a Test Date 

Id: Observer: 

As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 Fco O2 N2+C Md 

10.88 28.88 0.10 28.89 376 3.00 17.00 80.00 29.16 

0.9990 1.941 0.84 37.230 105.20 73.30 35.646 4.952 0.122 12.429 

•,ssumed Bws: 10.000 

DIp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfll Points Dn Total Test time Time C• point 

0.461 33.67 13,399 21,979 7.06E+05 '•0 0.315 60 3.00 

9/21/2011 

Ms Pitot Ck 

28.04 OK 

Leak Ck 

0.999 8"(•0 

Avg. DIh Test Time 

1.290000 12:06-12:12 

TRUE 

Time Point No, Meter (c0 dl "p" Target dl "h' Actual dl "h" Ts F tm F (in) 

0.00 551.18 0.17 1.05 1.00 372 72 

3.00 552.820 0.19 1.16 l.li 379 72 

6.00 554.480 0.16 0.98 0.95 379 72 

9.00 556,120 0.16 0.97 0.95 381 72 

12.00 557,850 0,19 1.15 1.10 385 72 

15.00 559.620 0.18 1.11 1.10 373 72 

18.00 2 561.420 0.20 1.22 1.20 380 73 

ZI,O0 563.330 0.22 1.34 1.30 380 73 

24.00 565.080 0.20 1.22 1.20 382 73 

•7.00 567.090 0.23 1.40 1.40 381 73 

)0.00 568.970 0.17 1.05 1.00 372 74 

)3.00 2 570.630 0.27 1.70 1.70 354 74 

)6.00 572.590 0,24 1.49 1,50 369 74 

)9.00 4 574.660 0.25 1,54 1.50 376 74 

12.00 576.810 0.28 1.72 1.70 378 74 

t5.00 578.850 0.21 1.31 1.30 365 74 

18.00 580.610 0.25 1.53 1.50 378 74 

31.00 582.620 0.26 1.59 1.60 379 74 

34.00 584.790 0.24 1.47 1.40 382 75 

37.00 586.570 0.22 1.35 1.30 380 75 

$0.00 0 588.410 

XAD Cond Temp F Filter Temp F Probe Temp F Vacuum Imp. Liquid Collected 

3 Wt. (end) Wt. (start) 

3 620.0 572.5 

604.7 569.7 

602.2 597.1 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

869.9 852.3 

3 

lsoklnetics 101.6 

Test Date 9/21/2011 

47.5 

35.0 

5.1 

0,0 

0.0 

17.6 

55 262 267 

47 265 269 

44 266 266 

45 263 2•4 

46 262 267 

45 262 261 

43 267 268 

43 265 265 

42 263 265 

43 261 267 

44 266 269 

46 265 264 

47 268 264 

46 263 261 

45 260 266 

40 258 263 

41 261 265 

43 259 267 

42 265 2•5 

44 261 262 

Page 
TEST DATA 

COMPANYNAME Whitacre-Greer Outlet Meth 29 

ADDRESS 24'] State Route 516 NW 

CITY Dover 

STATE OH 

ZIP i6103 

TEST METHODS Methos 1-4 

CREW MEMBERS Jeff P,Joe C 

LOCATION Outlet 

SOURCE Outlet Meth 29 

CONTROL 

DATE 

TIME 

RUN LENGTH (min) 

VOLUME (cubic feet) 

Y FACTOR 

BAROMETRIC 

METER TEMP. (R) 

STACK TEMP. (R) 

AVERAGE ^P 

AVERAGE ^H 

IMPINGER VOLUME 

PITOT COEF. 

STATIC PRESSURE 

STACK AREA 

NOZZLE SIZE(sq/ff) 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

OXYGEN 

NITROGEN 

Ba•house 

RUN#1 :•UN #2 

9/21/2011 

RUN #3 

9/21/2011 9/21/2011 

7:15-9:22 9:40-11:48 12:05-14:12 

120 120.00 120.00 

72.75 75.47 74.71 

28.88 28.85 28.88 

528.00 532.50 536.00 

841.60 843.05 

0.47 

80 80 

838.65 

0.47 0.47 

1.29 1.32 1.34 

221.70 206.50 201.00 

0.84 0.84 0.84 

0.10 0.10 0.10 

10.88 10.88 10.88 

0.0005412 0.000541 0.000541 

3.00 3.00 3.00 

17.00 17.00 17.00 

80 
TEST RESULTS 

VM (std) 

VW (std) 

BWS (measured) 

MD 

MS 

VS (ft/sec) 

SCFH 

ACFM 

DCFM 

ilSOKINETIC % 

OUTLET 

RUN#1 RUN#2 RUN#3 

70.42, 72.37 71.25 

10.45 9.73 9.47 

0.129 0.119 0.117 

29.16 29.16 29.16 

27.71832703 27.83726651 27.8505118 

34.29 34.66 34.48 

708534.3468 722829.7044 724534.502 

22387.61077 22625.53021 22606.7947 

11808.90578 12047.16174 12075.575 

99.96902046 100.6982794 98.9076957 

Vm (std) Volume of gas sampled at standard conditions. 

Vw (std) Volume of water vapor collected at standard conditions. 

Bws Stack moisture contenL 

Md Determination of dry molecular weight of stack gas. 

Ms Determination of stack gas molecular weight. 

Vs Average gas stack velocity. (ftJsec.) 

ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute of gas velocity. 

IDCFM Dry standard cubic feet per'minute of gas velocity. 
TEST DATA 

COMPANY NAME Whitacre-Greer Outlet Meth 29 

ADDRESS 2411 State Route 516 NW 

CITY Dover 

STATE OH 

ZIP 66103 

TEST METHODS Methos 1-4 

CREW MEMBERS JeffP,Joe C 

LOCATION Outlet 

SOURCE Outlet Meth 29 

CONTROL Bag•aouse 

DATE 

TIME 

RUN LENGTH (min) 

VOLUME (cubic feet) 

Y FACTOR 

BAROMETRIC 

METER TEMP, (R) 

STACK TEMP. (R) 

AVERAGE ^P 

AVERAGE ^H 

IMPINGER VOLUME 

PITOT COEF. 

STATIC PRESSURE 

STACK AREA 

NOZZLE SIZE (sqlft) 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

OXYGEN 

NITROGEN 

RUN #1 

9/21/2011 

:•UN #2 

9/21/2011 

RUN #3 

9/21/2011 

7:15-9:22 9:40-11:48 12:05-14:12 

120 120.00 120.00 

72.75 75.47 74.71 

28.85 

532.50 

28.88 

528.00 

841.60 843.05 

0.47 0.47 

1.29 1.32 

221.70 206.50 

0.84 

28.88 

536.00 

838.65 

0.47 

1.34 

201.00 

0.84 0.84 

0.10 0.10 0.10 

10.88 10.88 10.88 

0.0005412 0.000541 0.000541 

3.00 3.00 

17.00 

3.00 

17.00 17.00 

80 80 80 
TEST RESULTS 

VM (std) 

vw (std) 

BWS (measured) 

MD 

MS 

VS (ft/sec) 

SCFH 

ACFM 

DCFM 

ISOKINETIC % 

OUTLET 

RUN#t RUN#2 

70.42 72.37 

34.29 

•UN #3 

71.25 

10.45 9.73 9.47 

0.129 0.119 0.117 

29,16 29.16 29.t6 

27.71832703 27.83726651 27.8505118 

34.66 34.48 

708634,3468 722829.7044 724534.502 

22387.61077 22625.53021 22506.7947 

11808.90578 12047.16174 12075.575 

99.96902046 100.6982794 98.9076957 

Vm (std) Volume of gas sampled at standard conditions. 

Vw (std) Volume of water vapor collected at standard conditions. 

Bws Stack moisture content. 

Md Determination of dry molecular weight of stack gas. 

Ms Determination of stack gas molecular weight. 

Vs Average gas stack velocity. (ft/sec.) 

ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute of gas velocity. 

IDCFM Dry standard cubic feet per minute of gas velocity. 
TEST DATA 

RUN #1 

METHOD 29 

!Mercury ..(mg) 0,0289 

RUN #2 RUN #3 

0.0131 0.0413 

TEST RESULTS 

OUTLET 

RUN #1 

METHOD 29 

Mercury (mg/dscm) 

Mercury ,(mg/dscm @ 7% 02) 

0.014491 

0.051646 

RUN #2 RUN #3 

0.00639 0.0205 

0.02278 0.0729 

mgldscm Cs 

Mtl K4 

Vmstd 

Cs Concentration of a metal in the stack gas, mgldscm; 

K4 10-3 mg/ug. 

Mt Total mass of that metal collected in the sampling train, ug0 

Vmstd Volume of gas sample as measured by the dry gas meter, corrected to 

dry standard conditions, dscm. 
TEST RESULTS 

Lbs/Hr 

2.205 10 • 

scfh 

Vm std 

Mt 

2,205 10 ^-6 

Conversion from mg to Ibs. 

Standard stack volumetric flow rate. 

Volume of air sampled at stp. 

Total mass of that metal collected in the sampling traln, mg 

Mt 

scfh 

Vmstd 

RUN #1 .RUN #2. RUN #•3 

2.205,* 10^-6 2.205 lO^-6 2.205 lO^-6 

708534.35 722829.7 724534.5 

70.42 72.37 71.25 

Mercury 0.000641131 0.000288512 0.00092605 
TEST RESULTS 

Ibs/dscf 

Mercury 

RUN #1 

9.04869E-10 

RUN #2 

3.99142E-10 

RUN #3 

1.27813E-09 

mg/dscm 

Vm std 

Mt 

Cs 

Volume of air sampled at stp. 

Total mass ,of that metal collected in the sampling train, ug. 

Mt 10 ^-3 

Vm std .02832 

RUN #1 

70.423977 

RUN#2 

72.368946 

RUN #____•3 

71.249752 
Run 

•hitacre-Greer. Outlet Meth 29 

MeterBoxld: MB-I8 ProbelD 4p-2 ColdSoxlo:J EPAOb 

10.88 28.88 0.10 28.89 382 3.00 17.00 80,00 

1.0000 2.004 0.84 72.750 221.70 68.00 70.424 10.435 0.129 

Assumed Bws: 

Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfl• Points Dn Total Test time 

0.466 34,10 13,482 22,257 7.05E+05 20 0.315 120 

Tost Dale 9/21/201 

Md 

29.16 

Bws 

13.237 

I0,000 

Time @ point 

6.00 

Ms Pitot Ck 

28.04 OK 

Leak Ck 

0.999 5"(•.•.002 

Ave. DIh Test Time 

1.291500 7:15-9:22 

TRUE 

Time Point No. Meter Ic 0 dl "p" Target dl "h' Actual dl "h" TsF F (in) 

0.00 546,17 0.16 0.99 0.93 386 66 

6.00 549.280 0,25 1.58 1.50 367 66 

12.00 553.160 0.23 1.43 L40 378 66 

18.00 556.790 0.22 1.37 1.30 376 66 

24.00 560.390 0.25 1.56 1,50 380 67 

30.00 564,270 0,19 I. 18 1. 381 67 

36.00 567.580 0.18 1.12 1,20 381 67 

42.00 570.810 0.20 1.24 1.20 384 67 

48.00 574.340 0,21 1.30 1.20 386 68 

54.00 577.940 0.23 1.42 1.30 388 68 

60.00 581.960 0.18 1. I. 10 390 68 

66.00 585,330 0.22 1.36 1.30 385 68 

72.00 588,950 0.24 1,48 1.40 388 68 

78.00 592.680 0.26 1.63 1.50 378 68 

84.00 596.580 0.28 1.75 1.70 381 70 

90.00 600.670 0,24 1.50 1.40 380 70 

96.00 604.490 0.21 1.31 .20 381 70 

102.00 607.950 0.19 1.19 1.10 379 70 

108.00 611,530 0.20 1.25 1.20 3•1 70 

114.00 615.250 0.22 1,37 1.30 382 70 

120.00 618.920 

XAD Cond ,Temp F Filter Temp F Probe Temp F Vacuum 

49 250 255 

42 255 257 

39 257 258 

40 253 259 

42 255 261 

44 255 263 

45 258 264 

47 256 265 

48 259 266 

50 260 269 

53 262 266 

53 264 267 

•4 265 269 

55 267 270 

57 262 265 

52 266 269 

51 265 270 

49 268 266 

47 265 268 

45 266 269 

Imp. Liquid Collected 

Wt. (end) Wt. (start) Ic 

720.0 564.7 155.3 

644.3 590.0 54.3 

577.9 576.8 1. 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0,0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

845.4 834.4 11.0 

Isoklneti•s lOO.S 

Test Dale 9/21/20] 

Page 
Run 2 

Whltacre-Greer- Outlet Meth 29 

Meter•ox•d: M•-IS ProbelD 4p.2 comsox=o: EPAObserver: 

As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps .Avg. Ts F CO2 Fcm 02 N2+C 

I0.88 28.85 0.10 28,86 383 3.00 17.00 80.00 

Y AH Cp Vm cf VIc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws 

1.0000 2,004 0.84 75,470 206. 50 72.50 72.369 9,720 O. 118 

Assumed Bws: 

Avg. Sqrt #Sample 

mp vs scfm wet acfm qsd dsefl= Points Dn 

0.471 34.53 13,617 22,542 7,20E+05 20 0.315 120 

TRUE 

Time Point No. Meter (ct) dl "p" Target AH Actual dl All Ts F F (in) XAD 

0.00 619.520 0.20 1,24 1.20 388 71 

6.00 622.910 0.22 1.38 1.3 383 71 

12.00 626.810 0.26 1.62 1.50 384 71 

18.00 630.720 0.29 1.85 1.70 368 71 

24.00 634.980 0.24 1.51 1.40 377 71 

30.00 638.820 0.23 1,45 1,40 378 72 

36.00 642.690 0,26 1.63 1.50 380 72 

t2.00 646.580 0,22 1,38 1.30 381 72 

tS.00 650.180 0.20 1.25 1.20 383 72 

•4.00 653.490 0.19 1.19 1.10 384 72 

•0.00 657,360 0.23 1.44 1.40 386 73 

•6.00 660.950 0.25 1.56 1.50 388 73 

72.0,0 664,880 0.24 1.49 1.40 390 73 

78.00 668.590 0.19 1.18 I. 10 389 73 

•4.00 672.360 0.17 1.06 1.00 390 73 

•0.00 676.020 0.21 1.31 1.20 388 74 

•6.00 680.050 0.22 1.38 1.30 385 74 

02.00 684.070 0.26 1.62 1.50 390 74 

08.00 687.920 0.20 1.27 1.20 374 74 

14.00 691,920 0.18 I. 14 1.10 375 74 

20.00 694.990 

Test Date 9/2112011 

Total Test time 

Cond Temp F 

Md Ms Pilot Ck 

29.16 28.04 OK 

S Bws Leak Ck 

13.476 0.999 5"(•.00 

10.000 

Time (• point Avg. DIh Test Time 

6.00 1.315000 9:40-11:48 

Filter Temp F Probe Temp F Vacuum Imp. Liquid Collected 

60 

55 

52 

255 259 

257 263 

252 258 

48 256 260 

47 254 262 

45 255 260 

44 258 263 

46 259 265 

46 260 

47 257 

45 258 

268 

264 

265 

40 261 268 

40 263 269 

41 257 262 

40 259 266 

40 261 264 

39 263 267 

40 262 269 

41 258 265 

40 255 266 

Wt. (end) Wt. (start) Ic 

719.6 572.0 147.6 

638.5 596.9 41.6 

594.1 591.8 2.3 

0,0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

890.5 875.5 15.0 

l,oklnellcs 101.0 

Test Date 9/21/2011 

Page 
Run 3 

Outlet Meth 29 

Meteraoxld: MB-18 Pr°belD 4P-2 co•o•o:l •p•o6 

A,f,^2 Vber IPq('tet01 •' •vg.T, FICO•-•o,I O• 

•o.ss zs.ss o,•o •s.s• • •.oo 1•.oo so.oo 

v •": cp Vm•r •* Avg. Tm F Vmstd Vwstd Bws 

1,0000 2.•4 0.84 74.710 201.00 76.00 71.250 9.461 0.117 

Assumed 

Avg. Sq, g Sample 

DIp Vs scfm acfm Qsd dsc• Points Dn TotaIT•t time 

0.470 34.36 13,634 22,429 7.22E•5 20 0.315 120 

TRUE 

Test Date 

Md 

29.16 

S Bws 

12.786 

10.000 

Time,point 

6.00 

9/21/2011 

Ms Pitot Ck 

28.04 OK 

Leak Ck 

0.999 •0 

Avg. DIh Test Time 

1.335000 2:05-14:2 

Time Point No. Meter (cO dl '"p" Target dl %" Actual dl "h" Ts F F (in) 

0.00 695.67 0.23 1.47 1.40 372 75 

6.00 699.310 0.20 1.27 1.2 378 75 

12.00 703.050 0.24 1:51 1.40 382 75 

18.00 706.870 0.26 1.64 1,60 383 75 

Z4.00 710.690 0,23 1.45 1.40 383 75 

30.00 714.340 0.15 0.96 0.90 374 75 

36.00 717.480 0.21 1.37 1,.30 355 75 

42.00 720.940 0.20 1.28 1,20 370 76 

48.00 724.090 0.24 1.54 1.50 370 76 

54.00 728.390 0.22 1.40 1.30 376 76 

60.00 732.610 0.26, •66 1.60 375 76 

66.00 736.510 0.25 1.57 1.50 379 76 

72.00 740.350 0.20 1.27 1.20 381 76 

78.00 4 743,820 0.23 1.46 1.40 380 77 

84.00 747.250 0.20 1.27 1.20 382 77 

90.00 751.390 0.22 1.39 1.30 383 77 

96.00 755,020 0.26 1.64 .,50 387 77 

102.00 759.470 0.24 1.51 1.40 389 77 

108.00 763.240 0.21 1.32 1.30 388 77 

14.00 766.71 O, O. 19 1.20 1.10 386 77 

120.00 0 770.380 

XAD Cond Temp F Filter Temp F Probe Temp F Vacuum Imp. Liquid Collected 

Wt. (end) Wt. (start) Ic 

715.8 572.5 143.3 

604.7 569.7 35.0 

602.2 597. 5. 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

869.9 852.3 17.6 

isoklnetics 99.2 

Test Date 9/21/2011 

58 255 262 3 

52 259 267 

45 260 265 

45 257 26• 

43 253 267 • 

42 252 261 

43 255 263 

43 256 266 3 

44 256 269 

45 257 261 

48 252 263 4 

47 258 265 4 

49 257 265 

46 254 266 

47 256 264 3 

48 259 267 

49 2S5 263 

51 257 268 

• 260 266 

55 262 264 3 

Page 
Laborator Data 
Lab Data Sheet For. Whitacre- Creer Fireproofing P004 Outlet By: 

Moisture Weights Moisture 

ml ml ml ml ml ml rams 

Box ID 2 3 4 5 6 (•ri•dte 

568.7 679.0 601.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 888.6 

577.9 633.2 580.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 853.2 

-9.2 45.8 21.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.4 

Rea•lent H20 H20 H20 H20 

mLs 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 

Intial Imp mL 300.0 

ml ml 

Box ID 2 

604.9 619.5 

2 620.,2 588.4 

-15.3 31,1 

Rea•tent H2,O H20 

mLs 100.0 100.0 

mL mL 

Impin•ler Total 58.3 Total 93.7 

ml ml ml ml rams 

3 4 5 6 I•rietite 

616,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 905.5 

588.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 867.4 

27, 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.1 

H20 H20 

100.0 100.0 

Intial Imp mL 300,0 Impin•ler Total 

mL mL mL ml 

Box ID 2 3 4 

Gross 579.9 658.1 603.0 0.0 

Tare 10 573.0 619.3 596.3 0.0 

Net 6.9 38.8 6.7 0.0 

Rea•lent H20 H20 H20 H20 

mLs 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 

mL mL 

43.6 Total 81.7 

ml ml rams 

5 6 "l•rierite 

0.0 0.0 829.8 

0,0 0.0 794.5 

0.0 0.0 35.3 

Intial Imp mL 300.0 

mL mL 

Impinger Total 52,4 Total 87.7 

Joe Crowe 

Scale Serial # 1203240794 

Conditions: 

Initial 

Post 

Temp RH Date Pb 

66 49 911912011 28.73 

79 52 9/20/2011 28.88 
TITRATION DATA SHEET 

SAMPLE LOCATION $'•,.,'./•/ /Z,'/,-, •9•,//•/-- 

DATE 

TITRATION FOR 

STANDARD aS:• 

•AN• • .! 2 ./ 3 

2 • •2_ 3 2• 2_ 

SAMPLE 

RUN 

2. 

3 

TOTAL 

VOLUME 

ALOQUOT 

QOLUME 

/0 

TITRANT 

VOLUME 

33,0 

REMARKS 
Lab Data Sheet For: Whitacre- Creer Fireproofing P004 Outlet By: Joe Crowe 

Probe Rinse Wei•lht 

Run # Temp RH Bammetd(• Time Date Gross Temp RH Barometric Time Date Tare Net Gain 

59 55 25.14 / 8:19 1011312011 117057.1 59 50 28.59 ,t 5:15 19/23/20111117027.11 30 

72 84 28.•0 / 17:17 1011312011 117087.1 •1 53 28.• ] 14:22 •z•o• •70•7 •0.• 

AVG 30.05 

• se ss 2•'•4 •:22 •o/•20•l•e4s3.21 6• so •8'so s:•7 10/2•20•1•427.41 2s.s 

2 72 64 28.20 1•:19 1011312011 119453.2 71 63 28.• 14:25 912312011 119427.3 25.9 

AVG 25.85 

3 69 56 28,14 8:23 1011312011 101043.1 69 60 28.59 8:19 9/2312011 100994.8 48,3 

3 72 64 28.20 17:20 10/13/2011 101•3,1 71 63 28.• 1•:27 9123/2011 1009•.8 48.3 

AVG 48.3 

S•le Serial # 08204 Total Gain 104,2 
Lab Data Sheet For:. Whitacre- Creer Fireproofin•l P004 Outlet By: Joe Crowe 

Filter Weight 

Run# ID# Temp RH IBaromevi• Time Date Gross Temp RH Barometdc• Time Date Tare NetGain 

1758 69 56 28.14 | 8:15 10/13/2011 201•8,6 68 53 28.64 | 8:23 9/6/2011 20101 57.6 

175• 72 64 28.20 | 17:32 10/13/2011 20158.6 73 58 28.65 | 16:45 91612011 20101 57,6 

AVG 57.6 

2 1753 69 56 28.14 8:17 1011 •/2011 20522.7 68 53 28.64 8:00 91612011 20474 48.7 

2 1753 72 64 28.20 17:35 10/13/2011 20522.7 73 58 28.65 16:27 9/6/2011 '20473.9 48.8 

AVG 48.75 

3 1738 69 56 28.14 8:13 1011312011 20152.1 68 52 28.63 5:50 811912011 20103.9 482 

3 1738 72 64 28.20 17:30 10/1•/2011 20152.1 73 58 28.56 1'4:13 8•19/2011 201•)3.9 48.2 

AVG 48.2 

Scale Sedal # 08204 Total Gain 154.55 
Lab Data Sheet For: Whitacre-Greer Outlet Meth 26a By: Joe Crowe 

Moisture Weights 

ml ml 

Box ID 2 

Gross 620.0 644.3 

Tare 5 564.7 590.0 

Net 55.3 54.3 

Intial Imp mL 200,0 

ml ml 

Box ID 2 

Gross 620.0 638.5 

Tare 8 572.0 596.9 

Net 48.0 41.6 

Intial Imp mL 200.0 

mL mL 

Box ID 2 

Gross 620.0 604.7 

Tare 0 572.5 569.7 

Net 47,5 35.0 

Intial Imp mL 200.0 

Moisture 

ml ml ml ml "ares 

3 4 5 6 Drierite 

577.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 845.4 

576.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 834.4 

1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 

mL mL 

Impinger Total 110.7 Total 121.7 

ml ml ml ml rams 

3 4 5 6 l•rierite 

594.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 890.5 

591.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 875.5 

2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 

mL mL 

Impin•er Total 91.9 Total 106.9 

mL ml ml ml rams 

3 4 5 6 I•dedte 

602.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 869.9 

597.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 852.3 

5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 

mL mL 

Impinger Total 87.6 Total 105.2 
Lab Data Sheet For: Whitacre-Greer Outlet Meth 29 By: Joe Crowe 

Moisture Weights 

ml ml 

Box ID 2 

Gross 720.0 644.3 

Tare 5 564.7 590.0 

Net 155.3 54.3 

Intial Imp mL 200.0 

ml ml 

Box ID ,1 2 

=• Gross 719.6 638.5 

z 

D Tare 8 572.0 596.9 

Net 147.6 41,6 

Intial Imp mL 200.0 

mL mL 

Box ID 2 

Gross 715.8 604.7 

Tare 0 572.5 569.7 

Net 143.3 35.0 

Intial Imp mL 200.0 

Moisture 

ml ml ml ml rams 

3 4 5 6 Drier•e 

577.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 845.4 

576.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 83,4.4 

1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 

mL mL 

Impin•ler Total 210.7 Total 221.7 

ml ml ml ml 'ams 

3 4, 5 6 Drierite 

5,94.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 89.0.5 

59!,• 0.0 0.0 0.0 875.5 

2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 

mL mL 

Impin•ler Total 191.5 Total 206.5 

mL ml ml ml rams 

3 4 5 6 Drierite 

602.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 8,69.9 

597.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 852.3 

5,1 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 

mL mL 

Impinger Total 183.4 Total 201 
Columbia 

Analytical Services 1317 S. 13 Avenue, Kelso, WA 98626 360.577.7222 360.636.1068 (fax) www.caslab.com 

November 4, 20! Analytical Report for Service Request No: KI 109036 

Walt Mummert III 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 

14614 Cenfiled St. N.E. 

Alliance, OH 44601 

RE: Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Dear Walt: 

Enclosed are the results of the samples submitted to our laboratory on September 23, 201 l. For your 

reference, these analyses have been assigned our service request number K1109036. 

Analyses were performed according to our laboratory's NELAP-approved quality assurance program. 

The test results meet requirements &the current NELAP standards, where applicable, and except as 

noted in the laboratory case narrative provided. For a specific list ofNELAP-accredited anatytes, refer 

to the certifications section at www.caslab.com. All results are intended to be considered in their 

entirety, and Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. (CA.S) is not responsible for use of less than the 

complete report. Results apply only to the items submitted to the laboratory for analysis and individual 

items (samples) analyzed, as listed in the report. 

Please call if you have any questions. My extension is .3291. You may also contact me via Email at 

EWallace@caslab. co m. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Columbia Analytical ServiCes, Inc. 

Project Chemist 

t W/jw Page of 
ASTM 

A2LA 

CARB 

CAS Number 

CFC 

CFU 

DEC 

DEQ 

DHS 

DOE 

DOH 

EPA 

ELAP 

GC 

GC/MS 

LUFT 

M 

MCL 

MDL 

MPN 

MRL 

NA 

NC 

NCASI 

ND 

NIOSH 

PQL 

RCRA 

SIM 

TPH 

Acronyms 

American Society for Testing and Materials 

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation 

California Air Resources Bom'd 

Chemical Abstract Service registry Number 

Chlorofluorocarbon 

Colony-Forming Unit 

Department of Environmental Conservation 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Department of Health Services 

Department of Ecology 

Department of Health 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program 

Gas Chromatography 

Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry 

Leaking Underground Fuel Tank 

Modified 

Maximum Contaminant Level is the highest permissible concentration of a 

substance allowed in drinking water as established by the USEPA. 

Method Detection Limit 

Most Probable Number 

Method Reporting Limit 

Not Applicable 

Not Calculated 

National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement 

Not Detected 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 

Practical Quantitation Limit 

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 

Selected Ion Monitoring 

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 

Trace level is the concentration of an analyte that is less than the PQL but greater 

than or equal to the MDL. 

2 
Inorganic Data Qualifiers 

The result is an outlier. See case narrative. 

# The control limit criteria is not applicable. See narrative. 

B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result defined by 

the DOD NELAC standards. 

E The result is an estimate amount because the value exceeded the instrument calibration range. 

J The result is estimated value. 

LI The analyte was analyzed tbr, but was not detected ("Non-detect") at or above the MRIdMDL. 

DOD-QSM 4. definition Analyte was not detected and is reported as less than the LeD or as defined by the project. The 

detcetionlimit is adiusted for dilution. 

The MRUMDL LOQ/LOD is elevated due to a matrix interference. 

X See case narrative. 

Q see case narrative. One quality control criteria was outside the limits. 

H The holding time for this test is immediately following sample collection. The samples analyzed possible after 

receipt by the laboratory. 

Metals Data Qualifiers 

# The control limit criteria is not applicable. See case narrative. 

J The result is estimated value. 

E The percent difference for the serial dilution was gn'•ter than 10%, indicating possible matrix interference in the sample. 

M The duplicate injection precision was not met. 

N The Matrix Spike sample recovery is not within control limits. Sce case narrative. 

$ The reported value was determined by the Method of Standard Additions (MSA).. 

L1 The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Non-detect") at or above the MRL/MDL, 

DOD-QSM 4. definition Analyte was not detected and is reported as less than the LeD or as defined by the project. The 

detection limit is adjusted for dilution. 

W The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits, while sample absorbance is less than 50% of spike 

absorbance. 

The MRLtMDL or LOQ/LOD is elevated due to matrix interference. 

X Sac ease narrative. 

+ The correlation coefficient for the MSA islesa than 0.995. 

Q See case narrative. One or more quality control criteria outside the limits. 

Organic Data Qualifiers 

The result is an outlier. Se• case narrative. 

# The control limit criteria is not applicable. See narrative. 

A A tentatively identified compound, a suspected aldol-condensation product. 

B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result as defined by 

the DOD or NELAC standards. 

C The analyte was qualitatively confirmed using GC/MS techniques, pattern recognition, or by comparing to historical data. 

D The reported result is from dilution. 

E The result is an estimated value. 

J The result is an estimated value. 

N The result is presumptive. The analyte tentatively identified, but confirmation analysis was not performed. 

The GC HPLC confirmation criteria was exceeded. The relative percent difference is greater than 40% between the two P 

analytical results. 

U The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detaeted ("Non-detaet") at or above the MRL/MDL. 

DOD-QSM 4.1 definition Analyte was not detected and is reported less than the LeD or as defined by the project. The 

detection limit is adiusted for dilution. 

The MR.I./MDL or LOQ/LOD is elevated due to a chromatographic interference. 

X See ease narrative. 

Q See case narrative. One or more quality control criteria was outside the limits. 

Additional Petroleum Hydrocarbon Specific Qualifiers 

F The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample matches the elution pattern of the calibration standard. 

L The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates the presence of 

greater amount of lighter molecular weight constiluents than the calibration standard. 

I-] The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resamble• a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates the presence of 

greater amounl of heavier molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard. 

O The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles an oil, but does not match the calibration standard. 

Y The chromatographic finkerprint of the sample resembles petroleum product eluting in approximately the con'ect carbon 

range, but the elution pattern does not match the calibration standard. 

Z The chromatographic fingerprint does not resemble pen'oleum product. 

3 
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. 

Kelso, WA 

State Certifications, Accreditations, and Licenses 

Agency 

Alaska DEC UST 

Arizona DHS 

Arkansas DEQ 

California DHS 

Number 

UST-040 

AZ0339 

88-0637 

2286 

Florida DOH E87412 

Hawaii DOH 

Idaho DHW 

Indiana DOH C-WA-01 

Louisiana DEQ 3016 

Louisiana DHH LA050010 

Maine DHS WA0035 

Michigan DEQ 9949 

Minnesota DOH 053-999-368 

Montana DPHHS CERT0047 

Nevada DEP 

New Jersey DEP 

New Mexico ED 

North Carolina DWQ 

Oklahoma DEQ 

Oregon DEQ 

South Carolina DHEC 

Washington DOE 

Wisconsin DNR 

Wyoming (EPA Region 8) 

WA35 

WA005 

6O5 

9801 

WA100010 

61002 

C1203 

998386840 

ACIL 
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

Client: Custom. Stack Analysis Service Request No.: K1109036 

Project: Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company Date Received: 9/23/11 

Sample Matrix: Water 

CASE NARRATIVE 

All analyses were pertbm, ed consistent with the qtmli.W assunmce program of Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. 

(CAS). This report contains analytical results for samples designated for Tier II data deliverables. Wh.en appropriate to 

the method, method bl'ank results have been reported with each maalytic•fl test. Additional quality control analyses 

reported herein include: Labom.to .ry Duplicate (DUP), Matrix Spike (MS), and Laboratory. Control Sample (LCS). 

,S.•un pie Receipt 

Thirty-two samples were received for an.ab, sis at Columbia Analytical. Services on 9/23/11. The samples were 

received in good condition and consistea•t with the accompanying chain of custody form. Tile smnples were stored 

at room temperature upon receipt at the laboratory. 

Gener:d Chemistry P,'u'ameters 

No anomalies with lhe analysis of these samples were observed. 

T!!tal Metals 

Matrix Spike Recovery Exceptions: 

The control criteria, for malrix spike recovery of Mercury for sample Wbitacre-Greer Back l-k•lf Run 2 (Analytical 

Fraction 2B) were uot applicable. The analsCe concen•afion in the sample was sigaaificantly higher them the added spike 

concentration, preventing accurate evaluation of the spike recover).,. 
x x x x x x Method 29: Mercury 

Each Run is a separate sample. They are no_.Jt to be combine{ 
X 

Each Run is a 

separate sample. 

They are o__._•t n to 

be combined. 

/ 

0 

m 

Method 26A: HCL, 

Hydrofluoric Acid and Chlorine 
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. 

/• 'l_ ([• Cooler Receipt and Preservation Form 

Received:" b)l•.•l i Opened:- q/•zq]] .fi•rvic•RequestKll / 

..•"-• , By:..//-f Unloaded: •'/•.'/ ,y:• 

I. Smnples were received via? Mail •• UPS DHL/ PDX Courier Ha•td Delivered 

2. Samples were received in: (circle) •• Box Envelope •her NA 

3. Were custody seals on coolers? NA Y @ If yes, how m•y •d where? 

If present, were custody seals in•ct? Y N • preseng were flaey signed •d •ted? Y N 

7. Pacing n•tefial used. Insets Baggies Gel Packs W• Ice Sle•es Other 

8. Were custody papers properly filled out (i•, si•ed, etc.)? NA • N 

9. Did all bottles •ve in good condition (•broken)? Indicate in the table below. NA • N 

10. Were all smnple labels complete (i.e •ysis, prese•adon, etc.)? NA • N 

11. Did •1 smnple labels •d tags agee wifla custody papers? Indicate major discrepancies in the tab& on page 2. NA Y • 

12. Were appropriate bottles/containers •d volumes received for fl•e tests in,cared? NA • N 

13. Were fl•e pH-prese•ed bo•les (see SMO GEN SOP) received at •e appropdate pH? Indicate in the table below • Y N 

14. Were VOA vials received wiflmut headspace? Indicate in the table below. • Y N 

15. Was C12•es ne•five? Y N 

Notes, Discrepancies, & Resolutions: 

Page 1 of_ 
Client: 

Project: 

Sample Matrix: 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

AnMyfic.al Repot1 

Custom Stack Analysi,s. LLC. 

Whilacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Water 

Service Request: K1109036 

Date Collected: 9/21:201 

Date Received: 9/23/2011 

Date Ext|'aeted: NA 

h•organic Paramelcrs 

Unils: Total milligrams 

Analylo: 

EPA Molhod: 

Mothod Roporling Limit: 

Dalo Analyzod: 

Volume of Bottle Chloride 

26 

10/312¢} 

Sample Name 

Whitacre-Greer Conl#4 Run# 

Whitacre-Greer Conl#4 Rtm#2 

Whitaere-Greer Cont#4 R.un#3 

Whila+re-Grcer Conttl7 20Oral .IN NAOH BI,ANK 

Method Blank 

Lab Code 

K 109036.028 

K 109036.029 

K1109036-030 

K 11 ¢19036.032 

K1109036-MB 

248 

246 

248 

196 

0,040 

0J)89 

0.077 

-::0.020 

AD•,W0•I •;94 

q 
Client; 

Project: 

Sample Matrix: 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

Analylical Reporl 

Custom Slack Analysis. LLC. 

Whilacre-Orecr Fireproofing Company 

Water 

Service Request: K1109036 

Date Collected: 9/211201 

Date Received: 9/23i201 

Date Extracted: NA 

Inorganic Parameters 

Uuils: Toial milligrams 

Anal)ae: 

EPA Mcll•od: 

Mclhod Rcporli|•g Limil: 

Dale Analyzed: 

Volume of Bottle HCL 

26 

oi3/2()1 

Sample Name 

Whilacre-Greer Conlfl3 Run# 

Whitacrc.Grcer Contfl3 Runfl2 

Whilacrc-Orccr Coal//3 Run/t3 

Whilacre-Greer Coal//6 2011ml. N H2SO4 BLANK 

Method Blank 

Lab Code 

KI109036-025 

KI109036-026 

KII09036-027 

KI109036-031 

KII09036-MB 

246 

248 

249 

200 

1.7 

1.7 

1.9 

-"0.02 

--:0.020 

Kllflgn36wekls.I Te*'ls 11/912f111 
Client: 

Project: 

LCS Matrix: 

Analyte 

Chloride 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES• INC. 

QA/QC Report 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC, 

Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Water 

Service Request: K 1109036 

Dat,e Collected: NA 

Date Received: NA 

Date Extracted: NA 

Date Analyzed: 10/03/11 

Laboratory Control Sample Summary 

Chloride 

EPA Method 26 

Units: mg/L (ppm) 

EPA True 

Method Value Result 

Percent 

Recovery 

CAS 

Percent 

Recovery 

Acceptance 

Limits 

26 •.1 6.55 92 85-115 

LCS/102194 

l•110¢)036weLBI LC$ 101412011 

10 

P,• No.- 
Client: 

Project: 

Sample Matrix: 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC, 

Analytioal Report 

Custom Stack Az•alysis, LLC. 

Whitacre-Oreer Fireproofing Company 

Water 

Service Request: K1109036 

Date Collected: 9/21/201 

Date Received: 9/23/2011 

Date Extracted: NA 

Inorganic Parameters 

Units: Total milligrams 

Analyte: 

Standard Method: 

Method Reporling Limit: 

Date Analyzed: 

Volume of Bottle HF 

4500-F-C 

11/8/2011 

Sample Name 

Whilaore-Oreer Coal#3 Run#1 

Whitaoro-Greor Coat#3 Run#2 

Whitaore-Groer Conff/3 Run#3 

Whitaore-Groer Coat#6 200ml .IN H2SO4 BLANK 

Method Blank 

Lab Code 

KI109036-025 

K1109036-026 

KII09036-027 

K1109036.031 

KlI09036-MB 

248 

246 

248 

196 

22.8 

23.9 

26.2 

<0.04 

<0.04 

3A DW/061694 

g110903t•wal.l•2 3_']'¢• 1/9/2011 
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

Client: 

Project: 

Sample Matrix: 

QA/QC Roporl 

Cuslom Slack Analysis. LLC. 

Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Water 

Serwice Request: 

Date Collected: 

Date Received: 

Date Extracted: 

Date Analyzed: 

Duplicate Summer 3, 

Fluoride 

Standard Method 4500-F-C 

Unils: Tolal milligrams 

K 1109036 

9/21/2011 

09/23/11 

NA 

11/08/I 

Sample Name 

Whitacre-Greer Cont#3 Run# 

Lab Code 

K 09036-t325I)UP 

MRL 

0.04 

Sample 

Result 

22,8 

Duplicate 

Sample 

Result 

22.9 

Average 

22.8 

Relative 

Percent 

Difference 

<1 

DUPIA/10219/1 

Ki 109036wel,ls2 DUP 111912011 Page No.: 
Client: 

Project: 

Sample Matrix: 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

QA/QC Repor! 

Custom Stack Analysis. LLC. 

Whilaere-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Water 

Matrix Spike Summary 

Fluoride 

Standard Method 4500-F-C 

Units: Tola] milligrams 

Sample Name 

Whitacre-Greer Cont#3 Run# 

Lab Code 

109036-025MS 

MRL 

<0.04 

Spike 

Level 

12.9 

Sample 

Result 

22.8 

Spiked 

Sample 

Result 

35.2 

Service Request: 

Date Collected: 

Date Received: 

Date Extracted: 

Date Analyzed: 

Percent 

Recovery 

96 

K 1109036 

9/21/2O 11 

9/23/20 

NA 

11/8/2011 

CAS 

Percent 

Recovery 

Acceptance 

Limits 

75-t25 

MSIMI02194 

K1109036wel,ls] MS 1119/2011 Pa.•e Nn.. 
Client: 

Project: 

LCS Matrix: 

Analyte 

Fluoride 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

QA/QC Report 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 

Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Water 

Service Request: K 109036 

Date Collected: NA 

Date Received: NA 

Date Extracted: NA 

Date Analyzed: 11/08/11 

Laboratory Control Sample Summary 

Fluoride 

Standard Method 4500-F-C 

Units: mg/L (ppm) 

True Percent 

Value Result Recovery 

CAS 

Percent 

Recovery 

Acceptance 

Limits 

1.0 11.2 102 85-115 

I,('S,'102 Iq4 

K It]•lfx•el Ix2 LCTS I/OI201 

Pa,,ae No 
Client: 

Project: 

Sample Matrix: 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

Analytical Report 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 

Whitacre-G•'eer Fireproofing Company 

Misc. 

Service Request: 

Date Collected: 

Date Received: 

Date Extracted: 

Date Analyzed: 

Total Mercury 

EPA Method 29/7470A 

Units: Micrograms (l•g) 

(Field Blank Corrected) 

K1109036 

09/21/I 

09/23/11 

09/24-10/15/11 

10/07-17/11 

Sample Name 

Whitacre-Greer Front Half- Run 

(Analytical Fraction B) 

Whitaere-Greer Back Half- Run 

(Analytical Fraction 2B) 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 

(Analytical Fraction 3A) 

Whitaere-Greer Back Half- Run 

(Analytical Fraction 3B) 

Whitaere-Greer Back Half- Run 

(Analytical Fraction 3C) 

Lab Code 

K1109036-001,-004 

Kl109036-007 

Kli09036-010 

K1109036-013 

Kl109036-016 

MRL 

0.05 

0.2 

0.02 

0.I 

0.1 

Result 

ND 

9.8 

0.04 

1.9 

17.2 

Total Back Half- Run 

Total Back Half+ Front Half- Run 

0.42 

0.47 

28.9 

28.9 

K11090361CP,jel Hg Run 1/03/I 
Client: 

Project: 

Sample Matrix: 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

Analytical Report 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 

Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Misc. 

Service Request: K1109036 

Date Collected: 09/21/11 

Date Received: 09/23/11 

Date Extracted: 09/24-10/15/ 

Date Analyzed: 10/07-I 7/11 

Total Mercury 

EPA Method 29/7470A 

Units: Micrograms (•tg) 

(Field Blank Corrected) 

Sample Name 

Whitacre-Greer Front Half- Run 2 

(Analytical Fraction B) 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 2 

(Analytical Fraction 2B) 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 2 

(Analytical Fraction 3A) 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 2 

(Analytical Fraction 3B) 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 2 

(Analytical Fraction 3C) 

Lab Code 

K1109036-002,-005 

K1109036-008 

Kl109036-011 

KLI09036-014 

Kl109036-017 

MRL 

0,05 

0.2 

0.02 

0.1 

0.1 

Result 

0.10 

8.8 

0.30 

ND 

3.9 

Total Back Half- Run 2 

Total Back Half+ Front Half- Run 2 

0.42 

0.47 

.13.0 

13.1 

K11090361CP.jel Hg Run 11103111 
Client: 

Project: 

Sample Matrix: 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

Analytical Report 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 

Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Misc. 

Service Request: 

Date Collected: 

Date Received: 

Date Extracted: 

Date Analyzed: 

Total Mercury 

EPA Method 29/7470A 

Units: Micrograms (•g) 

(Field Blank Corrected) 

K1109036 

09/21/11 

09/23/11 

09/24-10/15/11 

10/07-17/11 

Sample Name 

Whitacre-Greer Front Half- Run 3 

(Analytical Fraction B) 

Whitacre-Greer Front Half- Run 3 

(Analytical Fraction 2B) 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 3 

(Analytical Fraction 3A) 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 3 

(Analytical Fraction 3B) 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 3 

(Analytical Fraction 3C) 

Lab Code 

K1109036-003,-006 

K1109036-009 

K1109036-012 

Kl109036-015 

Kl109036-018 

MRL 

0.05 

0.2 

0.02 

0.1 

0.1 

Result 

0.13 

19.0 

0.26 

0.3 

21.6 

Total Back Half- Run 3 

Total Back Half+ Front Half- Run 3 

0.42 

0.47 

41.2 

41.3 

K11090361CP.jcl I-Ig Run 11103111 Page No.: 
Client: 

Project: 

Sample Matrix: 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

Analytical Report 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 

Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Misc. 

Service Request: Kl109036 

Date Collected: 09/21/11 

Date Received: 09/23/11 

Date Extracted: 09/24-10/15/1 

Date Analyzed: 10/07-17/11 

Total Mercury 

EPA Method 29/7470A 

Units: Micrograms (/.tg) 

Sample Name 

Whitacre-Greer Front Half Blank 

(Analytical Fraction B) 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half Blank 

(Analytical Fraction 2B) 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half Blank 

(Analytical Fraction 3A) 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half Blank 

(Analytical Fraction 3B) 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half Blank 

(Analytical Fraction 3C) 

Lab Code 

K1109036-019,-024 

K1109036-019,-02! 

K1109036-019 

K1109036-020,-022 

K1109036-023 

MRL 

0.05 

0.2 

0.02 

0.1 

0.1 

Result 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

0.1 

K11090361CP,jel H• Field Blks 11/03/I Pnge N<•.: 

14 
Client: 

Project: 

Sample Matrix: 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

Analytical Report 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 

Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Misc. 

Total Mercury 

EPA Method 29/7470A 

Units: Micrograms (p.g) 

Service Request: K1109036 

Date Collected: NA 

Date Received: NA 

Date Extracted: 09/24-10/15/11 

Date Analyzed: 10/07-17/11 

Sample Name 

Front Half- Method Blank 

(Analytical Fraction B) 

Back Half- Method Blank 

(Analytical Fraction 2B) 

Back Half- Method Blank 

(Analytical Fraction 3A) 

Back Half- Method Blank 

(Analytical Fraction 3B) 

Back Half- Method Blank 

(Analytical Fraction 3C) 

Lab Code 

KI 109036-MBF 

K1109036-MBB1 

K1109036-MBB2 

K1109036-MBB3 

K1109036-MBB4 

MRL 

0.05 

0.2 

0.02 

0.1 

0.I 

Result 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

g11090361CP,jcl Ilg Metl•od Blks 1/03/I 
Client: 

Project: 

Sample Matrix: 

Sample Name: 

Lab Code: 

Analyte 

Mercury 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 

Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Misc. 

QA/QC Report 

Duplicate Summary 

Total Metals 

Units: Micrograms (•tg) 

(Field Blank Corrected) 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 2 (Analytical Fraction 2B) 

KI 109036-008D 

EPA Sample 

Method MRL Result 

29/7470A 0.2 8.8 

Duplicate 

Sample 

Result 

9.4 

Service Request: 

Date Collected: 

Date Received: 

Date Extracted: 

Date Analyzed: 

Average 

9.1 

K 1109036 

09/21/11 

09/23/11 

10/14/11 

10/15/11 

Relative 

Percent 

Difference 

K11090361CP•i¢1 DIJP 1/03/I Page 
Client: 

Project: 

Sample Matrix: 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 

Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Misc. 

QA/QC Repo• 

Matrix Spike Summary 

Total Metals 

Units: Micrograms (•tg) 

(Field Blank Corrected) 

Service Request: K1109036 

Date Collected: 09/21/11 

Date Received: 09/23/11 

Date Extracted: 10/14/11 

Date Analyzed: 10/15/II 

Sample Name: 

Lab Code:. 

Analyte 

Mercury 

Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 2 (Analytical Fraction 2B) 

KI 109036-008MS 

MRL 

0.2 

Spike Sample 

Level Result 

Spiked 

Sample 

Result 

CAS 

Percent 

Recovery 

Percent Acceptance 

Recovery Limits 

0.9 8.8 9.2 NA 70-130 

K 1090361CP•ic Spike 1103111 Page No.: 

17 
Client: 

Project: 

LCS Matrix: 

Source: 

Analyte 

Mercury 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

QA/QC Report 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 

Whitaere-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Water 

Service Request: K1109036 

Date Collected: NA 

Date Received: NA 

Date Analyzed: 10/15/11 

Laboratory Control Sample Summary (Front Half) 

Total Metals 

Units: •tg/L (ppb) 

CAS Spike Solution 

EPA 

Method 

29/7470A 

True 

Value 

l0 

Result 

11.1 

Percent 

Recovery 

111 

CAS 

Percent 

Recovery 

Acceptance 

Limits 

85-115 

K Iflt10361CP,j¢l I.CSW-Fron! 11/03/I Page No.: 
Client: 

Project: 

LCS Matrix: 

Soul'ce: 

Analyte 

Mercury 

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 

Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing Company 

Water 

CAS Spike Solution 

QA/QC Report 

Service Request: K1109036 

Date Collected: NA 

Date Received: NA 

Date Analyzed: 10/15/I1 

Laboratory Con.trol Sample Summary (Back Half) 

Total Metals 

Units: •tg/L (ppb) 

EPA 

Method 

29/7470A 

True 

Value 

5.0 

Result 

5.27 

Percent 

Recovery 

105 

CAS 

Percent 

Recovery 

Acceptance 

Limits 

85-115 

K110g0361CI•.jcl. I,CSW-Back 11/03/11 

19 
Calibration Data 
C.S.A. co. 

STACK SAMPLER CALIBRATION SHEET 

Customer Order No. 

Date 07/30/11 Serial No. 003 CSA Unit No. 003 

Pump OK Pump Oil CHNG Clean Quick Disconnects YES 

Maometers OK DryTest Meter OK Thermometers SEE CALSHT 

Lights OK Electrical Check OK Varlac OK 

Vacuum Guage OK Leak Check @ 27" Hg Vacuum NO LEAKS 

Remarks 8.1" NO LEAKS 

Barometer (Pb) 29.55 

K N DH CFw CFd Tw Itd Otd TD t H Y 

0.0158 0.0368 0.5 5 5.00 72 72 72 72 12.98 1.917 0.999 

0.0317 0.0737 1,O 5 4.96 72 72 72 72 9.26 1.957 1.005 

0.0634 0,1470 2.0 10 9.96 72 72 72 72 13.00 1.929 0.999 

0.1268 0.2490 4.0 10 10.00 72 72 72 72 9.23 1.945 0.991 

0.1902 0.4310 6.0 10 9.87 72 72 72 72 7.58 1.967 0,998 

0.2536 0.5880 8.0 10 9.80 72 72 72 72 6.50 1.929 1.000 

Tolerances H 1.6 1.8___•4-2.1 Y 0.99 1.0___QO 1.01 

H K/Pb (Otd + 460))) ((( Tw + 460) t / CFw )= 

Y (CFw Pb Td avg. + 460 )) / CFd (Pb + N Tw + 460)) 

DH Orifice pressure drop in. H20 

£Fw= Volume wet test meter F • 

CFd= Volume dry test meter F • 

Tw= Temp. wettest meter 

Itd= Inlet temperature dry test meter 

Otd= Outlet temperature dry test meter 

Td avg, Averagetemperature dry test meter 

t= Time minutes 

Pb= Barometer press. 

DIALTHERMOMETER CALIBRATION 

Precision Lab Thermometer 

Meter Thermometers 

Impinger Outlet Thermometer 

ICE WATER 

0 

ITd 0 OTd 0 

(1) 0 

(2) 0 

STACK DIGITAL TEMPERATURE INDICATORS 

NBS TRACABLE FROM FACTORY. 2 UNITS CALIBRATEDAGAINST EACH OTHERPyroMation 

ALL THERMOCOUPLES ARE CALIBRATED BY OVEN FROM 100 TO 500F AGAINST A CMS 

LAB THERMOMETER (No. 227-934). ANY THERMOCOUPLE THAT IS MORE THAN +_2% 

FROM STANDARD IS DISCARDED. 

Delta H 1.941 

Y: 0.999 

BOILING WATER 

0 

ITd 0 OTd 0 

0 

0 
C.S,A, Co. 

STACK SAMPLER CALIBRATION SHEET 

Customer 

Date 07/22/11 Serial No. MB 18 CSA Unit No. 

Pump OK Pump Oil CHNG Clean Quick Disconnects 

Maometers OK DryTest Meter OK Thermometers 

Lights OK Electrical Check OK Variac 

Vacuum Guage OK Leak Check @ 27" Hg Vacuum NO LEAKS 

Remarks 8.9" NO LEAKS 

Order No, 

018 

YES 

SEE CALSHT 

OK 

Barometer (Pb) 28.55 

K N DH CFw CFd Tw Itd Otd TD H Y 

0.0158 0.0368 0,5 5 5,00 81 82 81 81.5 12.90 1,985 1.000 

0,0317 0,0737 1.0 5 4.98 81 82 81 81,5 9,17 2,012 1.002 

0,0634 0,1470 2,0 10 9,82 81 82 82 82 12,93 1,996 1.015 

0,1268 0,2490 4,0 10 9,95 81 82 82 82 9,14 1,995 0.998 

0.1902 0.4310 6.0 10 9.94 82 82 82 82 7•2 1.980 0.991 

0.2536 0.5880 8.0 10 9.86 82 82 82 82 6.55 2.057 0,994 

Tolerances H 1.6 1.84 -2.1 Y 0.99 1.0__.Q- 1.01 

H K / Pb (Otd + 460))) (({ Tw + 460) t / CFw )2 

Y (CFw Pb Td avg, + 460 )) / CFd (Pb + N Tw + 460)) 

DH Orifice pressure drop in, H20 

CFw-- Volume wet test meter F a 

CFd= Volume dry test meter F 

Tw= Temp, wet test meter 

Itd= Inlet temperature dry test meter 

Otd= Outlet temperature dry test meter 

Td avg. Averagetemp.erature dry test meter 

t= Time minutes 

Pb= Barometer press. 

DIAL THERMOMETER CALIBRATION 

Precision Lab Thermometer 

Meter Thermometers 

Impinger Outlet Thermometer 

ICE WATER 

0 

ITd 0 OTd 0 

(1) 0 

(2) o 

STACK DIGITAL TEMPERATURE INDICATORS 

NSSTRACABLE FROM FACTORY. 2 UNITS CALIBRATEDAGAI ,NST EACH OTHERPyroMation 

ALL THERMOCOUPLES ARE CALIBRATED BY OVEN FROM 10OTO 500F AGAINST A CMS 

LAB THERMOMETER (No. 227-934). ANY THERMOCOUPLE THAT IS MORE THAN +2% 

FROM STANDARD IS DISCARDED. 

Delta H 2.004 

Y: 1.000 

BOIUNG WATER 

0 

ITd 0 OTd 0 

0 

O 
Nozzle Calibration Data 

Location: 

Method: 

Date: 

Source: 

Analyst: 

Run #1 

Run #2 

Tic" :•/• 

Run #3 

Mean 

Mean 

.7/? 

Mean 

,7/.s 7/¢ ] 
Method: 

Nozzle Calibration Data 

Date:, 

Source: 

Analyst: 

Run #1 

Run #2 

•/ y I, t/;. 

Mean 

Mean 

:•/5 

Mean 

:•/Y 
d 

o• 

_J 

LU 

W 

o 

_z 

•A 

© 

.._1 

13_ 

W 
ILl 

Z 

0 

l-- 

Z 

C• 

o 

•) 

LIJ 

W 

0 

LL 

...I 

W 
d 

8 
Calibration complies with leO 9001 

ISO/IEC 17025 AND ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 

Cert. No.: 1870-3593474 

Calibration 

C.•rtilicale No. 1750.01, 

Traceable@ Certificate of CaBbration for Digital Barometer Module 

Instrument Identification: 

Custom St•ck Analysis, LLC, 14614 Cenfield St NE, At'm: Joe Crowe, Alliance, OH 44601 U.S.A. RMA:959814 

Model: 1870 S/N: 90724105 Manufacturer Control Company 

Standards/Equipment: 

Description Serial Number Due Date 

Digital Barometer D4540001 8/19/11 

Chilled Mirror Hygrometer 3187.4/H2048MCR 7126111 

Digital Thermometer 90758953 9115/11 

NIST Traceable Reference 

1000283861 

8493 

4000,3167760 

••rtificate Information: 

Technician: 57 Procedure: CAL-31 

Test Conditions: 25.0°C 43.0 %RH 1009 mBar 

Col Date: 4/15/11 Cal Due: 10/15/11 

Calibration 

Unit(s) 

mb/hPa 

mblhPa 

mb/hPa 

%RH 

Data: 

NominaI..___L As. Foun.•d ]. In__•ToI.•! 

1 81o 

• 41 Y 

Nominal' 

1,006.27 

25.273 

---45.710 

AsL 

810 Y 

912 Y 

1,007 Y 

25 Y 

43 Y 

Min Max 

795 816 

898 919 

996 1,017 

24 26 

36 56 

+U TUR 

1.20 >4:1 

1.20 >4:1 

0.580 1.7:1 

1.300 >4:1 

This Instrument was calibrated usirig Instruments Traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology. 

A Teal Uncertainty Ratio Of at least 4:1 is maintained unless OtFk•rwia• stated anclte calculated u•ng tim expanded measurement uncertainty. UnceriainlY evgl,3ati•n InclUdeS It'm instrument 

teal and is calculated in accordance with the ISO "Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty Measurement" (GUM), "The uncerlainty represents expended 14ncertainty using covecage taclo¢k 2 

approximale 95% confidence level. In tolerance conditions based test rssUlts'falllng v•thin specified limitl with reduction by the uncertaintY of the measurement. The rssulls conlalned 

herein relate only I0 the item calibrated. This ce•lJficate shatl not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of Control C•mpany. 

Neminal=Standa•d's Reading; As Left=Instrument's Reading; In Tot=In Tolerance: MinJMax=Acoeptance Range; ±u=Expanded Measurement Uncertainly: TUR=TSSt Uncedainly Ratio: 

Acouracy=±(Max-Min)/2; Min Nominal(Rounded) Tolerance; Max Nominal(Rounded) Tolerance; Date=MM/DD/YY 

Nicel Rodrtguez, Quality Manager Wallace Boi'w, Technical IVlanagef 

Maintaining Accuracy: 

In opinion once calibrated your Digital Barometer Module should maintain its accuracy, There is exact way Io determine how long calibration will be maintained. Digital Be/omelet Modules 

change little, any at all. blJt be affected by aging, temperature, shock, and contamination. 

Recalibration: 

For factory calibl'alior, and re-certification traceable to National Institute of Slandards and Technology co.tact Conb'ol Company. 

CONTROLCOMPANY 4455 Rex Road Friendswood, TX 77546 USA 

Phone 281 482-1714 Fax 281 482-9448 servlce@control3.com w•v.control3.com 

Control Company is ISO 17025:2005 Calibration Laboratoey Accredited by (A2LA) American Association for Laboratory Acoredltadon. Certl/icate No. 1750.01. 

Conlrol Company is ISO 9001:2008 Quality Certified by (DNV) Det Norska V•itas, Certificate No. CERT-01805-2006..AQ-HOU-ANAB. 

Internat{o•al Laborato• Acoradttation Coopetallon (ILAC) Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MRA). 
Calibration complies with ISO 9001 

ISO/IEC 17025 AND ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 

",,,,,,,,,'" c•,,r•on 

Cert. No.: 3415-3076895 

Ce.rfific•ls No. 1750.01 

Traceable® Certificate of Calibration for Digital Calipers 

Instrument Identification: 

Model: 3415 S/N: 101856179 Manufacturer" Control Company 

Standards/Equipment: 

Description Serial'Number Due Date NIST Traceable Reference 

Gage Block Set 99146223 9t22/10 1000267588 

Certificate Information: 

Technician: 57 Procedure: CAL-05 Cal Date: 8/03/10 Cal Due: 8103112 

Test Conditions: 24.5°C 42.0 %RH 1019 mBar 

cafibrati•n-D•ta: (New Instrument)- 

Unit(s) Nominal As Found In Tol 

in 

in N.A. 

in 6e•th N.A. 

in inside •_. N.A. 

Nominal 

0.0000 

As Left 

0.0000 

0.1000 0.1000 

2.0000 2.0005 

4.0000 4.0000 

6.0000 6.0005 

2.0000 1.9995 

1.0000 1.0000 

In Tol Min 

-0.0010 

Max ±u TUR 

0.0010 0.0003 3.3:1 

0.1010 0.0003 3.3:1 

0,0004 

0.0990 

1.9980 2.0020 0.0003 >4:1 

3.9960 4.0040 0.0004 >4:1 

5.9940 6.0060 >4:1 

2.0020 0.0003 >4:1 

1.0010 0.0003 3.2:1 

1.9980 

0.9990 

This Instrument was calibrated using Instruments Traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology. 

A Test Urcedainty Ralio of at least 4:1 •s maintained unless otherwise stated and is calculated using the expandod measurement uncertainty, Uncodainty evaluation includes the instr•nent under 

and is calcuisled In z•.ordance with the ISO "Guide to the Expression of Uncerta•nt• in Measurement" (GUMJ. The unce•ainty represents expanded uncertainty using coverage fastot ks2 

to approximate 95% confidence level. In tolerance conditinnt based test results fallin= wlt•n specified limits with rm:|ucllon by the uncertainty of the mossuram0nt. The results contained 

herein relate only to the item calibrated. Thee certificate shell not be regroduced excopt in fur, without written approval of Control Comp•'•y. 

Nomtnal=Standerd's Reading; As Left=Instrument's Reading; In Tol=th Tolerance; MinfMax=AccePtance Range; ±U=Expanded Measurement Uncedeinty; TUR=Ta•t Uncertainty Ratio; 

Accuracy=+{Msxq¢liny'2; Min Nominal{Rounded} Tolerance; Max Nominal(Rocmded) Tolerance; DaT•=MM/OD/YY 

Nicol Rodr•guez, Quality Manager Wallace Bern/, Ted'micel Manager 

Maintaining ",•.••i 

th apron calioreled your Digital Calipers should maintain its accuracy. There is axec.t way 1o determine how tong calibration will be maintained. Digital Cel•perss change little, any al 

all, but be affected by aging, lemperature. =hock. and contamination. 

Recalibration: 

For factory calibrslion and re-.certifcabon traceable to National Inslilu•te of Stsr',dards and Technology contact Control Compaoy. 

CONTROL COMPANY 4455 Rex Road Friendswood, TX 77546 USA 

Phone 281 482-1714 Fax 281 482-9448 servlce•control3.com www.control3.com 

Co¢ltrol Company is leO 17025'.2005 C=dibration Laboratory Accredited by (/k?.LA} Amedcen Association lot Laboratory Accreditation, Certi•cate No. 1750.01, 

Control Company Is ISO 9001:2008 Quality' Cettilrisd by {DNV) Det Notre Ve¢ilas, Cedtr•,•ats No. CERT-01 B05.2006-AO-HOU-ANAB. 

International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC} Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MRA). 

Page of Trace•bl¢• ii registered ttldtm•rk orconttol Company (• 2009 Contro• Company 
• ••_ Calibration complies with iSO 9001 

•• • ISO/IEC 17025 AND ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 

',•,,,,•,'" C•,brat•on 

Cert. No.: 3415-3757006 

Ce.rlillcnle No. 1750.01 

Traceable® Certificate of Calibration for Digital Calipers 

Manufactured for and distributed by: VWR International, Inc., 1310 Goshen Parkway, West Chester, P.A. 19380 U.S.A. 

Instrument Identification: 

Custom St•ck Analysis, LLC, 14614 Cenfield St NE, At'm: Walt Mumme•, Nliance, OH •601U-S'•" RMA:962285 

Model: 62379-531 S/N: 51055322 Manufacturer: Control Company 

Standards/Equipment: 

Description Serial Nurnbe.r Due Date 

Gage Block Set 99146223 10/01/11 

NIST Traceable Reference 

1000286154 

Certificate Information: 

Technician: 57 Procedure: CAL-05 

Test Conditions: 24.0°C 41.0 %RH 1014 mBar 

Calibration Data: 

Unit(s) Nominal 'As Found In Tel Nominal 

in --61•6 6T••-6--] • o.oooo 

in •',:1"•-• "0-•" '|"-:-• • 

0.1000 

in •.-.•0• 1,999•-5 "• 2.0000 

•n 4.0000 3.9990 Y 4.0000 

in 6.0000 5.9980 Y 6.0000 

in depth 2.0000 1.9990 •_•.•! 2.0000 

in inside 1.0000 0.9990 1.0000' 

Cal Date: 7/07/11 Cal Due: 7/07112 

As Left 

0.0000 

0.0995 

1.9990 Y 

3.9990 Y 

5.9980 Y 

1.9990 Y-- 

0,9990 Y 

In Tel Min 

Y -0.0010 

Y 0.0990 

Max 

0.0010 

0.1010 

1.9980 2.0020 

3.9960 4.0040 

5.9940 6.0060 

1.9980 2.0020 

0.9990 1,0010 

+U TUR 

0 0003 3.3:1 

!0.0003 3'.3:1 

0.0003 •4:1 

0.0004 :•4:1 

0,0004 •4:1 

0,0003' •4:1 

0,0003 3.1:1 

This Instrument was calibrated using Instruments Traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology. 

A Teat Uncertainly Ratio of at leaal 4:1 is maintained unless otherwise stated and is calculated using Ihe expanded measurement unce•lainty. Uncertainty eveluetio• inc•ude• the instrument urger 

lest and calculated in accordance wi• the ISO "Guide to the E•.oras=ion of Uncertainty in Measurament" (GUM}. The uncertainty represents expr•nded uncertainty using co'•rage factor k=2 

to approximate 95% confidence level. In toleranCe conditions based test results falling within specified limits with reduction by/he uncertainty of •he messyernest. The result• contained 

herein relate onJy to the item calibrated. This certihcata shall nct be reproduced except in full, w•thout v•ltlen approval of Control Company. 

Nominal=Standard's Reading; As Left=Instrument's Reading; In Tel=in Tolerance; Min/Max=Accep•ance Range; ±U=Expandod Measurement Uncertainty;, TUR=Test Unc•lainty Ratio; 

Accuracy=¢|Max-Min)r2; Min Nominal(Rounded) Tolerance: Max Nominal(Rounded) Tolerance; Data=MM/DDfYY 

N/col Rodriguez, Quality Manager Wallace Berry, Technical M•nager 

Maintaining Accuracy: 

In opinion once calibrated y•ur D•gital Calipers should maintain its accuracy. There is exact way Io determine how long calibration will be maintained. Digital Caliperss change little, if any at 

all, • be affected by aging, temperature, shock, and contamination. 

Recalibration: 

For factory calibration and re-ce•tificalion traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology contact Control Company. 

CONTROL COMPANY 4455 Rex Road Frlendswood. TX 77546 USA 

Phone 281 482-1714 Fax 281 482-9448 service@control3.com www.control3.com 

Conlrol Company is ISO 17025:2005 Calibration L•boratory Accrodil•:l by (A2LA) Amorlcan Association for Laboratory Accreditation, Certificate No, 1750,01. 

Control Company is ISO 9001 ;2008 Quality Certified by (.DNV) Dot Norske Veritas, Certificate No. CERT-O1805-2006-AQ-HOU-ANAB. 

International Laboratory Accreditation Cool, oration (ILAC) Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MRA). 

P=B¢ or" T•=ccablL'• is reglstcrcd tradczn•J,: el'Central Comp=my ID 2009 Coat,el Comp=sy 
Calibration complies with ISO 900t 

ISO/IEC 17025 AND ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 

Ca•ibra•on Cert, No.: 3461-3773982 

Certilicale No. 1750,01 

Traceable®.Certificate of Calibration for ManometedPressure/Vacuum Gauge 

Manufactured for and distributed by: VWR International, Inc., 1310 Goshen Parkway, West Chester, P.A. 19380 U.S.A. 

Instrument Identification: 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC, 14614 Canfield St NE, Attn: Walt Mummert, Alliance, OH 44601 U.S.A. RMA:962285 

Model: 33500-084 S/N: 72018122 Manufacturer: Control Company 

Standards/Equipment: 

Description, 

Pressure Calibrator 

Serial Number Due Date NIST Traceable Reference 

8 e00010402 7113112 1000301003 

Certificate Information: 

Technician: 61 Procedure: CAL-346X 

Test Conditions: 23.0°C 46.0 %RH 1011 mBar 

Cal Date: 7/15/11 Cal Due: 7/15/12 

Calibration Data: 

This Instrument was calibrated uslng Instrumen• Traceable to •a•onal Instltute of S•ndards and Technology. 

Ni•l R•riguoZ, Quality M•ger Walla• Be•, T•ni=l M•ager 

Maintaining Accuracy: 

In opinion calibrated your Manomeler/Pt'essureNacuum Gauge shou•l maintain ies accuracy. Tt•aro is exac• way to determine how long calibration wilt be maintained. 

ManomaterfPrassureNacuum Gauges •hanga little, tf any at all. but be affected by aging, temperature, shock, and contamination. 

Recalibration: 

For factory c.at•ralion end re-certification traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology cantact Control Company. 

CONTROL COMPANY 4455 Rex Road Friendswood, TX 77546 USA 

Phone 281 482o1714 Fax 281 482.9448 service@control3.com wv/w.control3.com 

Control Company is ISO 17025:2005 Calibration Laboratory Ac•'ediled by (A2LA) Amedcan Association for Laboratory Aco'editalion, Certificate No. 17•0.01. 

Control Company is ISO 9001:2008 Quality Certified by (DIN) Det No•ke Varitas, Certificate No. CERT-0160•2006-AQ-HOU-ANA•. 

Internalional Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MRA), 

Page of Traccabl'•0 is registered Imdemtrk el'Control Company © 2009 Control Company 
Calibration complies with ISO 9001 

ISO/IEC 17025 AND ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 

"',t,.I.•," Calibr,•tion Cert. No.: 1870-3759307 

Certificale Na. 1750.01 

Traceable@ Certificate of Calibration for Digital Barometer Module 

Instrument Identification: 

Custorn Stack Analysts, LLC, 14614 Cenfield St NE, Attn: Walt Mummed, Alliance, OH 44601U-S-•.. RMA:962285 

Model: 1870 S/N: 90724105 Manufacturer: Control Company 

Description Serial Number Due Date 

Digital Barometer, D4540001 8/19]11 

Chilled Mirror Hygro .meter 31874/H2048MCR 5/12/12 

Digital Thermometer 90758953 9t15/11 

NIST Traceable Reference 

100o283861 

9193 

4000-3167760 

Certificate Information: 

Technician: 57 Procedure: CAL-31 

Test Conditions: 24.0°C 43.0 %RH 1011 mBar 

Cal Date: 7/08/11 Cal Due: 7108/12 

Calibration Data: 

mb/hPa 909.20 

mb]hP• 1,010.30 

;C 23.969 

%RH • 43,980 

As Found -i In Tel 

912 

1,012 Y 

41 

Nominal As Left 

805.10 809 

910.30 913 

1,010.52 1,012 

25.565 25 

40.97• 39 

Min Max L ±U 

795 • 

900 921 • 1.20 

1,000 1,021 • 

25 2•7 0.580 

TUR 

>4:1 

>4:1 

>•,:1 

This Instrument was calibrated using Instruments Traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology. 

A Test Uncertainty Ratio o! at teest 4:1 is maintained untet• otherwise stated and is calcu•terJ us(rig th• expanded measLcement uncertainty. Uncertainty •valuation includes the insthJme•t under 

test and is calculated in acc•dance with Ihe I$O "Guide the Expression of Uncertainly in Meesurernont" {GUM), Ttto uncertainty represents expanded uncertain•y using ¢ovetage•actot k=2 

approximate 95% conrCdance level. In tolerance conditions based test results fallir•g within specified limits with reduction by the uncertainty/of the measurement. •be result• contained 

herein relate only to •e item calibrated, This certificate shall not be rap•educa¢l except in full, wi|hoat written approval of Control Company. 

Nominat=Standa•'d's Reading; As Left=Instrument's Reading, In Tel=In Tolerance; Min/Max=Acceptance Range; :•.l=Expanded Measurement Uncertainly; TUR=Test Uncertainty Ratio;. 

Acc•racy=:l:(Max-Min)t2; Min Nominal(Rounded) Tolerance; Max Nominal(Rounded) Tolerance; Dete=MM/DD/W 

Nicol Rodr/guez, Quality Manager Wallace Berry, Technical Manager 

Maintaining Accuracy: 

In opinion calibrated you.r Digita] Beromot#t Module should maintain its accuracy. There is exact way to determine how long calibration will be maintained. Digital Barometer Modules 

change little, if any at all, but can'bo affected by aging, tempensture, shack, and corltarn[na•Jon 

Recalibration: 

For •actory calibration and re-cerllf•caflon traceable to National Instilute o• Standards and Technology contact Control Company. 

CONTROL COMPANY 4455 Rex Road Friendswood, TX77546 USA 

Phone 281 482o1714 Fax 281 482-9448 service@control3.com www, control3.com 

Control Company is ISO 17025:2005 Calibration Laboratory Acc/edlt•d by (A2.LA) American Association fat Laboratory Ac•editotion, Certificate No, 1750.01. 

Control Company is ISO 900• :2008 Quality CertirP•d by {DNV) DeS Norska Vedtas, Certificate No. CERT.01805-2006-AQ.HOU-ANAB. 

International Laboratory Aco,'editetion Cooperation (ILAC)- Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MRA). 

P.F.¢ at" Tr•ceabl• is r¢sistercd tr•¢n•rk o•'C0.1•ol Comp=• • 200• Co.lrol Company 
Calibration complies with ISO 9001 

ISO/IEC 17025 AND ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 

"/"/.h, •''•" Calibration Cert. No.: 1870-3759301 

Ceriilicale No. 1750.01 

Traceable® Certificate of Calibration for Digital Barometer Module 

Manufactured for and distributed by: VWR International, Inc., I310 Goshen Parkway, West Chester, P.A. 19380 U.S.A. 

Instrument Identification: 

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC, 14614 Cenfield St NE, Attn: Walt Mumme• Alliance, OH 44601U-S-A" RMA:962285 

Model: 23609-208 S/N: 61542879 Manufacturer: Control Company 

Standards/Equipment: 

Description Serial Number Due Date 

Digital Barometer D4540001 8/19/11 

Chilled Mirror Hygrometer 31874/H2048MCR 5/12112 

Digital Thermometer 90758953 9/15/11 

NIST Traceable Reference 

1000283861 

9193 

4000-3167760 

Certificate Information: 

Technician: 57 Procedure: CAL-31 

Test Conditions: 24.0°C 43.0 %RH 1011 mBar, 

Cal Date: 7/08/11 Cal Due: 7/08/12 

Calibration Data: 

Unit(s) Nominal 

mb/hPa 804,90 

mb/hPa 909.20 

mb/hPa 1,010.30 

°C 23.969 

%RH 43.980 

802 805.10 

As Left In Tel Min 

802 Y 795 

§08' Y 900 

1,0'09 Y ii00b', 

25 Y 25 

37 Y 31 

816 1.20 >4:1 

921 1.20 >•4:1 

1,021 1.20 >4:1 

27 0.580 1;7:1 

51 1.300 >;4:1 

Thls Instrument was calibrated using Instruments Traceable to'National Institute of Standards and Technology. 

A Test Unceelairlly Ratio of at least 4:1 is maintained unless other•vise stated and is oalculaled using the expa.,'•dec• measurement uncertainty. Uncertainty evaluation indude• the insl•ument under 

teal and is calculated in acc•dance with the ISO "Guide the Expression of Unoartainty in Measurement" [GUM). The uncerlainty represents expended unced•inty using caverage #actor k=2 

approximate 95% ccefiden, level. In tolerance condilions based test results felling within specified limllswilh reduction by the uncertainty of the measurement. The resull•i contained 

•erein relate only te Ihe item celtbraled. This cortificet• shall hal be relzoduced except in full. wilhout wdlten approval of Control Company. 

Nomlnal=Slandard's Reading; As Lefl.=lnstrumenl's Reading; In Tel=In Tolerance: MirYM•x=AcCeplanCe Range; +U=Expended Measurement Uncertainty; TUR=Test Unce•ainly Ratio; 

Accuracy=±(Max-MinV2; Mln Nominal(Rounded) Tolerance; Max Nominal{Rounded) Tolerance; Dale=MM/DDPfY 

Niool Rodr/ouez. Quality Manager Wallace Berry, Technical Manager 

Maintaining Accuracy: 

In opinion calibralad your Digital Barometer Module should maintain its accuraw• There is exact way to determine how long callbralion will be maintained. Digital Barometer Modules 

change tittle, any el all, but be affected by eg=ng, temperature, shock, and contamlnalion. 

Recalibration: 

For factory calibration and re-certificatlon traceable to National Institute of Standards and TecJrmology contact Conlrol Company. 

CONTROL COMPANY 4455 Rex Road Friendswood,'lX 77546 USA 

Phone 281 482-1714 Fax 281 482-9448 service@control3.com www.control3.com 

Control Corn•any Is ISO 17025:2005 Calibrat/on Laborato•//•¢•zedited by (A2LA) Amartcer• Association for Laboratory Accreditation, Ce•ficate No. 1750.01 

Conlrol Company is leo 9001:2008 Quality Certlr=ed by (DNV) Del N0rske Veritas, Certificate No. CERT-01805-2006-AQ-HOU-ANAB, 

International LaboraloG Acc•edilalinn Ccepe•allon {ILAC) Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MRA). 

Page or Traceablc•gs is rcg;•ltred trademark of Centre| Colaplny O 2rl0O Con{•'•l Compan.v 
THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATIONS FOR SOURCE SAMPLING APPARATUS 

FACILITY 

UNIT NO SERIAL NO. Pb 

CALIBRATED IN ICE WATERiAND BOILING WATER USING A CMS PRECISION GLASS THERMOMETER NO. 229-054, ASTM NO. •3F FOR ICE WATER AND CMS NO. 

229-088, ASTM NO. 66F FOR' BOILING WATER. 

TC • TC • TC 

CONDENSOR THERMOCOUPLES 

r,:..t 32 •,2.•- 32 ,2-,/// 

32 

'ROBE THERMO_COUPLES 

32 • 212 

32 -• 212 

32 • 212 

32 

212 

3p.2 32 

212 

32 

212 

32 

212 

•p.• 32 

•t•:• 32 

32 

32 

212 

212 

212 

212 

6_P_d 32 

• 32 

• 32 

6P-4 32 

212 

212 

212 

212 

•,. 32 212 

32 212 

TMERMOCOUPLE TEMPERATURES ARE READ ON THE DTI USED DURING TEST. 

DTI CALIBRATED BY ALTEK 22 TC SOURCE S# 243783 PRIOR TO TC CAL. 
THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATIONS FOR SOURCE SAMPLING APPARATUS 

UNIT NO, SERIAL NO. Pb 

CALg'IRATED IN ICE WATER AND BOILING WATER US/,NG A CM$ PRECISION GLASS "/HERMOME'[ER NO. 229-054, AS'I'M NO. 63F FOR ICE WATER AND CM$ NO 

229•1•8. AS'I•,I NO C•F FOR BOILING WATER. 

32 212 

o• 

32 '• • 212 •/7.2-. 

o.:-• 32 2._ 7,)"-" 

O• 

32 212 

212 

32 

32 /2-- 

212 

212 

212 

212 

32 212 

3S .2 32 212 

32 212 

32 

32 

-IS-2 

32 

32 

4,.s.:l. 

32 

32 

32 

212 

2Y2' 

21-2 

•'I2" 

212 

Zl.Z 

212 

212 

212 

•s._3 32 212 

•-IER/dOCOUPLF. TEMPERA'RJRES ARE READ ON THE D'I'I USED DURING 

OTi CAI.I•it:IATEO •9•" AI.TI•.K 22 rC gOURCG .• 2437113 PRIOR TO TC'CAL 
THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATIONS FOR SOURCE SAMPLING APPARATUS 

UNIT NO SERIAL NO. Pb 

CALIBRATED IN ICE WATER AND BOILING WATER USING A CMS PRECISION GI•ASS THERMOMETER NO. 229-054, ASTM NO, 63F FOR ICE WATER AND CMS NO. 

229-088, ASTM NO, 66F FOR BOILING WATER 

|•;•,_VY_•_.,P=• BOILING WATER 

TC P_B.EGJ•O.U TC • TC 

STACK THERMOCOUPLE 

=ROBE THERMOCOUPLES 

IdLe_:! 32 73 212 _2/,• 

•2e-Z 32 212 

•Ze.9. 32 212 

.M_E_T_ER rHERMOCOUPLES UNIT ool 

• 

32 212 

M-.Z 32 212 

•,•..•R THERMQCQI•PIwES.- UNIT O0• 

M-• 32 7.•.-. • 

212 2 /£2-- 

• 32 • 3:2- I• 212 

•I•]'ER THE RMOC•O_U•PL • 

M-• 32 "-•,,2-, 212 

ME•ER THE•.M._O_C_OU.PLE$ UNIT 004 

.METER TJ-JF•'•MOCQUPLES UNIT 17 

• 3• ,• • •, 212 

212 

.METER THERMOCOUPLES U, NIT 18 

THERMOCOUPLE TEMPERATURES ARE READ ON THE DTI USED DURING TEST• 

CALIBRATED BY ALTEK 22 TC SOURCE S# 243783 PRIOR TO TC CAL. 
Client: 

Pitot Tube Inspection 

Date: 

Level and Perpendicular 

Obstruction? 

Damaged? 

a; (-lO < a,< +1o.) 

b, (-5 <b:< +5 •) 

A (Pa {- Pb) 

Zs= A tan Y (< 0.125") 

Ws= A tan 0 (< 0.03"125") 

Dt (0.1875" < Dt < 0.375") 

P. (1.05 D• < P.• < 1.5 D,) 

P•.. (1.05 D• P, < 1.5 DI) 

• •- Pb • "0-•0"6-3 •' 

Probe Minimum l.nterf'ercnces 

x (> .75") | X/D,, (>= 1.5") 

Zp (>= .75") [ 

D• 

Zs 

ws 

al 

a2 

bl 

b2 

X 

Zp 

Y 

P,• • Pb 

Distance between where pilots adjoin to lip of pilol (Must be between 1.05 & 1,50 times O.D. of tubing) 

Distance between wl]ere pilols adjoin to li•) of pilot (Musl be between 1.05 & 1.50, times O.D, of tubing) 

Diamete• of pilot tube (0.375 inches on all pilols) 

Distance between the tip of the impact an'd static line along (he length of the pilot (Must be <1/8 inch(0.1250)) 

Spacing between Pilot lubes where welded together (Must be <1/32 inch (0.0313)) 

Angle across opening of Pilot tube from side [o side or perpendicular to length of probe (Must be <10 Deg) 

Angle across opening of Pitot tube from side to side or perpendicular to lenglh of probe (Must be <10 Deg) 

Angle across opening of Pilot tube from side to side or perpendicular to length of probe (Must be <5 Deg) 

Angle across opening of Pilot tube from side to side or perpendicular to length of probe (Must be <5 Deg) 

Distance between side of nozzle and side of pilot tube (Must be >3t4 inch) 

Distance from center of pilot opening back to lip of thermal couple (Must be >--3/4 inch (0.75)) 

Distance from center of pilot opening back to probe (Must be >=3 inches) 

W 

;:,':O:,XO D) &,< I.(-.'. O L) 

zP 
Nozzle Calibration Data 

Facility: 

Location: 

Method: • •'/• 

Date: 

Analyst: 

Run #1 

,,•/#s 

Run #2 

Run #3 

•I_• 's_z• 

Mean 

Mean 

Mean 
Client: 

Pitot Tube Inspection 

Date: 

Probe/Pilot Number 

Level and Perpendicular 

Obstruction? 

Damaged? 

al (-10 < a•< +10o) 

a:, (-10 < a•< +10 °) 

b, (-5 < b•< +5 

A (Pa + Pb) 

Zs= A tan Y (< 0.125") 

Ws= A tan 0 (< 0.03125") 

D, (0.1875" < D• < 0.375") 

P. (1.05 D, < P. < 1.5 D•) 

Pb (1.05 D• < P, < 1.5 D•) 

Pa Pb ,•_; 0.063" 

b• (-5" < b•< +5 °) 0 

Probe ('vlii•imum Intcrf'¢renccs 

Y (>= 3.0") 

X (> .75") X tD. (>= 1.5") 

"Zp (>= .75") 

Pa 

Pb 

DI 

Zs 

Ws 

al 

a2 

b• 

b2 

X 

Zp 

Y 

Distance between where pilols adjoin to tip of pilot (Must be between 1.05 & 1,50 times O.D. of tubing) Distanue between where pilots adjoin to lip of pilot (Must be between 1.05 & 1.50 times O.D. of tubing) Diameter of pilot tube (0.375 inches on all pilots) 

Dislance between the tip of the impact and static line along the length of the pltot (Must be <1/8 inch(0.1250)) Spacing between Pilot tubes where welded together (Must be <1/32 inch (0.0313)) 

Angle across opening of Pilot tube from side to side or perpendicular" to tenglh of probe (Must be <10 Deg) 

Angle across opening of Pilot tube from side to side or perpendicular to length of probe (Must be <10 Deg) 

Angle across opening of Pitot tube from side to side or perpendloular te length of probe (Must be <5 Deg) 

Angle across opening of Pilot tube from side to side or perpendicular to }ength of probe (Must be <5 Deg) 

Distance between side of nozzle and side of pilot tube (Must be >3/4 Inch) 

Distance from center of pilot opening back to tip of thermal couple (Must be >=3/4,inch (0.75)) 

Distance from center of pilot opening bac}¢ to probe (Must be >=3 Inches) 

el & a2 

w 

ma 6 Pb {:' O5 O D) & (': 
Production Data