alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         173,887
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5785466
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    4304963
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              10997214
<PP&E>                                        24192800
<DEPRECIATION>                                  523570 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                37022216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         11506405
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       2500000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    13078076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  37022216
<SALES>                                        7461246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7917766
<CGS>                                          7655049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8080840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                165393
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              260398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (163074)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   ( 61968)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (101106)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (101106)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (   .04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (   .04)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of The Stephan Co. (the "Company) on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert C. Spindler,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Robert C. Spindler


Robert C.
Spindler


Chief
Financial Officer


December
7, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,977
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  205,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,412)
<INVENTORY>                                    757,210
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               968,671
<PP&E>                                         256,973
<DEPRECIATION>                               (134,051)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,127,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          334,232
<BONDS>                                        295,717
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       163,718
<OTHER-SE>                                     306,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,127,377
<SALES>                                        797,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               797,100
<CGS>                                          677,788
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  677,788
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               109,874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,438
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,215
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2647 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2647

     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
     Assistance Act to provide eligibility for public broadcasting 
   facilities to receive certain disaster assistance, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2013

   Mr. Higgins (for himself, Mr. Palazzo, Ms. Granger, Mr. Cole, Mr. 
Gibson, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Sires, and Mr. Young of Alaska) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
     Assistance Act to provide eligibility for public broadcasting 
   facilities to receive certain disaster assistance, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Information Improvement 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF PUBLIC BROADCASTING FACILITIES FOR CERTAIN 
              DISASTER ASSISTANCE.

    (a) Private Nonprofit Facility Defined.--Section 102(11)(B) of the 
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 5122(10)(B)) is amended by inserting ``public broadcasting 
facilities,'' after ``workshops,''.
    (b) Critical Services Defined.--Section 406(a)(3)(B) of the Robert 
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
5172(a)(3)(B)) is amended by striking ``communications,'' and inserting 
``communications (including broadcast and telecommunications),''.
    (c) Applicability.--The amendments made by this section shall apply 
to a major disaster declared by the President under the Robert T. 
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 
et seq.) on or after October 28, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
j ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 23-0575 

RIKKI HELD; LANDER B., by and through his 

guardian Sara Busse; BADGE B., by and through 

his guardian Sara Busse; SARIEL SANDOVAL; 

KIAN T., by and through his guardian Todd 

Tanner; GEORGIANNA FISCHER; KATHRYN 

GRACE GIBSON-SNYDER; EVA L., by and 

through her guardian Mark Lighthiser; MIKA K., 

by and through his guardian Rachel Kantor; 

OLIVIA VESOVICH; JEFFREY K., by and 

through his guardian Laura King; NATHANIEL 

K., by and through his guardian Laura King; 

CLAIRE VLASES; RUBY D., by and through her 

guardian Shane Doyle; LILIAN D., by and through 

her guardian Shane Doyle; TALEAH 

HERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiffs and Appellees, 

v. 

STA'1E OF MONTANA, GOVERNOR GREG 

GIANFORTE, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, MONTANA 

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 

AND CONSERVATION, and MONTANA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 

Defendants and Appellants. 

ORDER 

F %LEO 

IAA 2E1 2024 

reenvv000 

Clerk. of 

SuprCi

eme 

Court 

state of 

is/Winter-1P 

Andrew B. Cashmore, of Boston, Massachusetts, has petitioned for permission to 

appear pro hac vice before this Court in the above-entitled cause. 

Having reviewed the application and having determined that, as required by our Rules 

for Admission to the Bar of Montana, Petitioner is currently in good standing with another 

state jurisdiction in which Petitioner is adrnitted to the practice of law, Montana counsel 

03/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0575
listed in the application is in good standing with the State Bar of Montana, and this is the 

first appearance of Petitioner and the first appearance of Petitioner's firm under the pro hac 

vice rules, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application of Andrew B. Cashmore to appear 

pro hac vice in the above-entitled cause is GRANTED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Andrew B. Cashmore, to all 

counsel of record in this appeal, and to the State Bar of Montana. 

DATED this 26th day of March 2024. 

For the Court, 

By
**EXHIBIT 3.2**

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**OF**

**ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**CENTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION**

**SEONHONG KIM** and **YONG HWA KIM** certify: 

1. That they are President and Secretary, respectively, of Center Financial Corporation, aCalifornia corporation. 

2. That ARTICLE THREE of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation shall be amended to read in full as follows:

**“ARTICLE THREE. AUTHORIZED STOCK:** This Corporation is authorized to issue two (2) classes of stock: one class of sharesto be called “Common Stock”; the second class of shares to be called “Serial Preferred Stock.” The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is Fifty Million (50,000,000), of which FortyMillion (40,000,000) shall be Common Stock and Ten Million (10,000,000) shall be Serial Preferred Stock. When this amendment to the Articles of Incorporation has been filed with the Secretary of State, each share of Common Stock issued andoutstanding on the filing date shall be split up and converted into two (2) shares.” 

“The Serial Preferred Stock may beissued from time to time in one or more series. The Board of Directors is hereby authorized to fix or alter the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon any wholly unissued series of preferred shares, and thenumber of shares constituting any such series and a designation thereof, or any of them; and to increase or decrease the number of shares of any series subsequent to the issue of shares of that series, but not below the number of such series thenoutstanding. In case the number of shares of any series shall be so decreased, the shares constituting such decrease shall resume that status which they had prior to the adoption of the resolution originally fixing the number of shares of suchseries.” 

3. That the foregoing amendment has been duly approved by the Board of Directors at a special meeting held onJanuary 28, 2004. 

4. That the primary purpose of said amendment when approved and filed, as set forth by the Board of Directors, isto split each issued and outstanding share of Common Stock into two (2) shares. This amendment is one which may be approved by the Board of Directors alone without shareholder action pursuant to Section 902(c) of the CaliforniaCorporations Code. The Corporation has only one class of shares outstanding and the amendment effects only a stock 

split and the increase in the authorized number of shares provided in the amendment in proportion to the split. 

We further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the matters set forth herein are true and correct of our ownknowledge. Executed at Los Angeles, California on January 28, 2004. 

 
 /s/ Seon Hong Kim **SEON HONG KIM, President** /s/ Yong Hwa Kim **YONG HWA KIM, Secretary**
 

2
#### FERDINAND KALKBRENNER v. TOWN OF AUGUSTA and Another.1

October 13, 1911.

Nos. 17,231—(56).

Highway.

In an action to enjoin defendants from constructing a graded roadway over plaintiff’s land, the finding that there was not a public highway at the place described was supported by the evidence, and the findings sustain the judgment. [Reporter.]

• Action in the district court for Lae qui Parle county for an injunction restraining defendants from trespassing upon certain land or constructing an embank-, •ment for the use of a highway thereon. The answer denied' that defendants ever entered upon plaintiff’s land or that they made embankments, culverts or grades thereon, except upon a public highway. The case was tried before Powers> J., who made findings of fact and as conclusion of law ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order, defendants appealed.

Affirmed.

*Borgendale é Bclmle,*for appellants.

*J. H. Driscoll,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 133 N. W. 1134.

*539Pee Curiam.

Appeal from a judgment permanently enjoining tlie defendants from constructing a graded roadway over plaintiff’s land. The supervisors of the town of Augusta, having undertaken to grade and adapt for use as a road a four-rod strip of land along a section line, and having entered upon the land and begun the work, the owner of the land on one side of the section line brought this action to restrain the town and the road overseer from further prosecution of the work.

Upon the trial, the sole issue presented and tried was whether the strip of land in question was a public road, the town claiming that it.became a road in one or all of three ways: By the action of the town board in 1882 under authority of G. S. 1878, c. 13, § 73, by a later dedication on the part of the then owner of the land and an acceptance by the public, and by continuous public use for a period of ■over thirty years.

The testimony submitted in support of these claims was not convincing, and the trial court found: “That there is not, and was not at any time mentioned in the complaint, a public highway upon or along the north and south line between sections 1 and 2, township 118, range 46, in said town, of Augusta, nor at the place where the defendants committed the trespass and did the work hereinafter mentioned.”

Such finding is fairly in accord with the evidence and, with the other findings, including one that the defendants were about" to continue the unlawful work, sustains the judgment appealed from.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Marianne Molleur, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StockerYale, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report.

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Marianne Molleur   
|Marianne Molleur       
|Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ERIC FLORES,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00133-CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20110D01621)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We 

further order this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley JJ.
Take notice that on January 19, 2000, Potomac Electric Power Company tendered for filing a correction to Amendment No. 1 to its electric service agreement with Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc.

The requested effective date of January 1, 2000, for Amendment No. 1, a rate reduction was not changed.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before February 11, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-2661 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE   CONTAINS   SUMMARY   FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM
SOUTHWESTERN  BELL TELEPHONE  COMPANY'S  JUNE 30, 1998 FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS ON
FORM 10-Q AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>                                              
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                  65
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                            46
<INVENTORY>                                              0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     2,666
<PP&E>                                              31,986
<DEPRECIATION>                                      19,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      15,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,317
<BONDS>                                              4,585
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1
<OTHER-SE>                                           3,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        15,561
<SALES>                                                  0<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     5,449
<CGS>                                                    0<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        63
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,278
<INCOME-TAX>                                           474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    804
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           804
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
<FN> 
<F1> THIS AMOUNT IS IMMATERIAL.
<F2> NET SALES OF  TANGIBLE  PRODUCTS  IS NOT MORE THAN 10% OF TOTAL  OPERATING
     REVENUES AND  THEREFORE  HAS NOT BEEN STATED  SEPARATELY  IN THE FINANCIAL
     STATEMENTS  PURSUANT  TO  REGULATION  S-X,  RULE  5-03(B).  THIS AMOUNT IS
     INCLUDED IN THE "TOTAL REVENUES" TAG.
<F3> COST OF TANGIBLE  GOODS SOLD IS INCLUDED IN COST OF SERVICES  AND PRODUCTS
     IN  THE  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND  THE  "TOTAL-COST"  TAG,  PURSUANT  TO
     REGULATION S-X,RULE 5-03(B).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------

<PAGE>

                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP

                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER

                                  CWABS, INC.
                    ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2005-2
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-2

     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

/s/ Craig Baingo                       Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT


/s/ Kevin Meyers                       Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION