alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL 

INC., EMC CORPORATION, AND 

VMWARE, INC.

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-482-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Please take notice that attorney Brian M. Koide of the law firm ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, 

PLLC appears as counsel of record for Plaintiff Uniloc 2017. Mr. Koide hereby requests that all 

notices required to be given, and all papers required to be served in the above-entitled and 

numbered cause, be copied to and served upon him.

Dated: November 2, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Brian M. Koide

Brian M. Koide 

Virginia Bar No. 46,329

ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Telephone: (703) 565-2852

Facsimile: (817) 887-5950 

brian@etheridgelaw.com

Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 41 Filed 11/02/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document was served upon all counsel of record via the 

Court's CM/ECF electronic filing system in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure on November 2, 2020.

/s/ Brian M. Koide

Brian M. Koide

Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 41 Filed 11/02/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 185 (Friday, September 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24430]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than October 10, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, 
Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 
94105-1579:
    1. Tehama Bancorp, Red Bluff, California; to acquire convertible 
preferred shares of Central Pacific Mortgage Company, Folsom, 
California, and thereby engage in originating and selling mortgage 
loans, pursuant to Sec. 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 19, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-24430 Filed 9-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99(b)

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nautica Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies that:

        (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended November 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

        (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                               By: s/ Wayne A. Marino
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                   Wayne A. Marino
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)

Date:  January 10, 2003
     ------------------
<PAGE>   1






                                                                   EXHIBIT 12(a)

           UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY
                             AND AFFILIATE COMPANIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Three Months Ended September 30,
                                                                    --------------------------------
Millions of Dollars Except Ratios                                         2000             1999
---------------------------------                                   --------------    --------------
<S>                                                                 <C>               <C>

Earnings:
   Net Income ...................................................   $          274    $          234
   Undistributed equity earnings ................................              (16)              (14)
                                                                    --------------    --------------
   Total ........................................................              258               220
                                                                    --------------    --------------
Income Taxes ....................................................              159               146
                                                                    --------------    --------------
Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense including amortization of debt discount .....              146               158
   Portion of rentals representing an interest factor ...........               44                48
                                                                    --------------    --------------
   Total fixed charges ..........................................              190               206
                                                                    --------------    --------------
Earnings available for fixed charges ............................   $          607    $          572
                                                                    --------------    --------------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (Note 6) .....................              3.2               2.8
                                                                    --------------    --------------
</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0583

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TAYLOR JAY DAMM,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until January 12, 2024, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

December 11 2023

12/11/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0583
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-1608

Lower Tribunal No. 2020-CA-7589-O

_____________________________

NICOLE INGRAM and CHRIS INGRAM, individually and as parent of A.I., a minor,

Appellants, 

v.

VISTANA MANAGEMENT, INC.,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Reginald K. Whitehead, Judge.

April 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, SMITH and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Alan D. Sackrin, of Sackrin & Tolchinsky, P.A., Hallandale Beach, for Appellants.

Lissette Gonzalez, of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5449 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5449

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of lambda-
                              cyhalothrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Mr. Meehan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of lambda-
                              cyhalothrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF LAMBDA-CYHALOTHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.09 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures of lambda-
cyhalothrin) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JEREMY SHERRILL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-973

[June 6, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey Colbath, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 502010CF003996A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale 

Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
|                                                                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                                              
|No chart available.                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                 
|Kentucky Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | W      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF TREASURER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Kenneth L. Johnson, Treasurer of St. Joseph, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of St. Joseph, Inc.





By:
              /s/KENNETH L. JOHNSONName:  Kenneth
      L. JohnsonTitle:  TreasurerDate:  March
      30, 2010
#### JOHN V. GOBERSHOCK v. McLEOD COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY.1

June 23, 1911.

Nos. 17,136—(172).

Sagging of telephone wire — question of negligence.

In an action for personal injury caused by plaintiff, while riding on the top oi a box car, coming in contact with defendant’s wire, the court did not err in submitting to the jury the question of negligent maintenance of the wire,, and a verdict of $3,000 was not excessive. [Reporter.]

Action in the district court for McLeod county to recover $25,000 for personal injuries. The answer was a general denial. The ease was tried before Morrison, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $3,000. From an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, it appealed.

Affirmed.

*G. M. Tijft*and *W. G. Odell,*for appellant.

*Larrabee & Davies,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 131 N. W. 1133.

Per Curiam.

Defendant strung its telephone wire over and across the tracks of the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company at Glencoe. Plaintiff was in the employ of the railroad company as a freight conductor. On approaching Glencoe on a regular trip of his train, plaintiff was upon the top of the one of the box cars therein, and was caught by the wire of the telephone company and injured. The wire came in contact with his face and upon the bridge of his nose, extending across his left eye; the principal injury being to that organ, particularly td *530tlie nerves thereof. He subsequently brought this action to recover for the injuries so received. A verdict was returned in his favor for $3,000. ■ Defendant appealed from an order denying a new trial. A careful examination of the record presents no reversible error.

The complaint 'alleged a negligent construction of the wire over the tracks, and also a negligent maintenance thereof. The evidence tended to show that, although properly constructed and at a sufficient height above the track to avoid1 contact with railroad employees when upon box ears, it had become out of order and sagged down so low as to endanger the safety of the railroad men, and that it had remained in that condition for. ten days or .two weeks prior to the accident to plaintiff. We discover no error in submitting the question of improper and negligent maintenance of the wire to the jury. It was sufficiently charged in the complaint. The evidence made a case for the jury upon the facts.

Defendant was out of employment in consequence of his injury for about a year, and this, in connection with such suffering as he endured and the expense» incident to his treatment, precludes a holding by this court that the verdict is, excessive.

Order affirmed.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SAWGRASS MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-3061

TERRY MONE AND DIANE MONE,

Appellees.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 18, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Volusia County,

Dennis Craig, Judge.

Jack R. Reiter and Robert D. Peters, 

of GrayRobinson, P.A., Miami, 

for Appellant.

Mark A. Nation and Paul W. Pritchard, 

of The Nation Law Firm, Longwood, 

for Appellees.

UPON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

Our prior opinion of September 2, 2016, was disapproved by the Florida Supreme 

Court “to the extent it is inconsistent with [the Florida Supreme] Court’s opinion in Joyce 

v. Federated Nat’l Ins. Co., 228 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. 2017),” and the case was remanded to 
2

this court “for instructions not inconsistent with th[e] Court’s opinion in Joyce.” See Mone 

v. Sawgrass Mut. Ins. Co., 43 Fla. L. Weekly S185 (Fla. Apr. 20, 2018). Upon 

reconsideration, we affirm the final judgment awarding attorney’s fees, including the trial 

court’s application of a multiplier to the attorney’s fees award. Based upon Appellees’

prior concession of error, we reverse the award of $26,918.43 in court costs regarding 

the services provided by two of Appellees’ expert witnesses, Nettles & Associates and 

Reliable Field Services of Central Florida, Inc. On remand, the trial court is directed to 

strike this amount from the final judgment.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED, with instructions.

COHEN, C.J., LAMBERT, J., and LEMONIDIS, R.C., Associate Judge, concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5429 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5429

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain non-women's footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

Mr. Huelskamp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain non-women's footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN NON-WOMEN'S FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Other tennis        Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          shoes, basketball                                                 12/31/2015
                          shoes, and the
                          like, with outer
                          soles of rubber,
                          plastic, leather,
                          or composition
                          leather and
                          uppers of
                          leather, not
                          covering the
                          ankle, valued
                          more than $2.50/
                          pair, other than
                          house slippers
                          and work
                          footwear, the
                          forgoing for
                          persons other
                          than women
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          6403.99.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### CASSELL v. STATE.

No. 24697.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 8, 1950.

None on appeal ifor appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, -for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is the selling of whisky in a dry area and the punishment, a fine of $400.

The record is before us without statement of facts- o.r bills of exception. Nothing is presented 'for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
1 Home Campus
Des Moines, IA 50328-0001

Management Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, Wells Fargo Home
Mortgage Inc. has complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period, Wells Fargo
Home Mortgage Inc. had in effect a fidelity bond along with an
errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $100 million
and $20 million, respectively.

February 25, 2003

/s/ Pete Wissinger

-----------------
Peter Wissinger
Chief Execucutive Officer


/s/ Michael J. Heid

--------------------

Michael J. Heid
Chief Financial Officer
Executive Vice President


/s/ Robert Caruso

------------------
Robert Caruso
Senior Vice President
Loan Servicing
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

David Duane Bryant , Appellant

No. 06

- 21

- 00152

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 29164 ). Memorandum Opinio n delivered by Chief Justice Morriss

, Justice Stevens and Justice van Cleef participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the app ellant, David Duane Bryant , has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 8, 2022 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk