alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000,000
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            $    48
<SECURITIES>                                           89
<RECEIVABLES>                                         527
<ALLOWANCES>                                            4
<INVENTORY>                                            61
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      906
<PP&E>                                             14,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                      4,344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     12,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 909
<BONDS>                                               675
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                            55
<COMMON>                                              167
<OTHER-SE>                                          6,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       12,391
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    2,145
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       1,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (54)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       588
<INCOME-TAX>                                          214
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   374
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                          374
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        

</TABLE>
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF BEM SYSTEMS, INBC. DOCKETNO. FAA-2016-4264 (Civil Penalty Action) Case No. 2015NM730029 Served: December 6, 2016

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL Please take NOTICEthat the undersigned FAAAttorney herein makes his appearance on behalfofthe Complainant in the matter. As such, please direct all further communications inthis matter to Attorney Jeanine C. Gotimer as setforth below. Respectfully submitted this 61 h day ofDecember 2016.
Naomi Tsuda Assistant ChiefCounsel

for Enforcement
By:



# Je:Q~~ Senior Attorney Enforcement Division, Northeast Team 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 email: jeanine.gotimer@faa.gov Telephone: (718) 553-3272 (direct) (718) 995-5699 (fax)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### I certify that the foregoing Notice of Appearance IN THE MATTER OF BEM SYSTEMS, INC., 

### DOCKET NO. FAA-2016-4264 (Civil Penalty Action), Case No. 2015NM730029 has been sent this date by FedEx Mail to: BEM Systems, Inc. 

### Respondent ATTN: MarkMurset, CFO 1

00 Passaic Avenue Chatham, NJ 07928 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 Washington, DC 20591
And via Facsimile The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,

### AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 FAX: StaffAssistant (202) 366-7536 

# tQ!.



# /<~-v "-fJ.-L

. aHooks Management & 

### Program Analyst December 6, 2016 Date:
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS AEROSTAFF SERVI CES, I NC., and MI DSOUTH CONSTRUCTI ON, I NC ./L UI S F . CI SNE RO S, Ap pe lla

nts /Cr os s- Ap pe lle e s,
v.
L UI S F. C I S NER OS / AER OS TAFF SERVI CES, I

NC., and MI DSOUTH CONSTRUCTI ON, I

NC., Ap pe lle e /Cr os s- Ap pe lla nt. §

§ § § § § No. 08-08-00106- CV

Appea l from the County Court at L aw No. F ive of El Pa so County , T e xas (TC#2004-1617)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION Pe nd ingbe fo re the Court

is the joi nt

m o t i o n b y A p p e l l a nt / C r o s s - A p p e l l e e Ae ro sta ff

Se rv ic e s, I nc. , Ap pel lan t/ Cr os s-A pp ell ee Mi ds ou th Co ns tr uct io n, I nc. , an d Ap pel lee /C ros s-A pp ell ant Lui s F. Cisneros to dismi ss this appeal pursua nt to T EX . R. A PP . P. 42 .1 (a )( 1) . T he pa rtie s jo int ly

re qu e st that e a c h p art

y be or de re d to bea

r its ow n co sts
. We g ra

nt the mot ion

and dis mis s th e a

pp e a l, w ith the c os ts o f a

pp e a l taxed

a g a ins t th e pa

rt y tha t in c ur re d th e m.
KENNET H R. CARR, J ustice J uly 31, 2008 B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l u r e , a n d C ar r , JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5594 

To suspend temporarily the duty on plastic mesh for filters. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. ELLISON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on plastic mesh for filters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PLASTIC MESH FOR FILTERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Woven mesh of 

perfluoroalkoxy copolymer 

resin with fibers measuring 

100 to 120 microns in diameter, for use in manufacturing filters of heading 

8421 (provided for in subheading 5407.71.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5594 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

COURTNEY COX,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 434 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26460]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Government in the Sunshine Meeting Notice

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Wednesday, October 18, 2000.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: October 11, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-26460 Filed 10-11-00; 11:28 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 199 / Friday, October 13, 2000 / Presidential Documents 60835

Proclamation 7361 of October 10, 2000

General Pulaski Memorial Day, 2000

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Each year on October 11, we solemnly pause to honor the life and achievements of Casimir Pulaski, a true hero whose devotion to liberty has inspired

the gratitude of the American people for more than 200 years.

Born to wealth and privilege in Poland, Pulaski sacrificed both by joining

his father and brothers in the fight against tyranny and foreign oppression

in his beloved homeland. His battlefield exploits earned him a leading

position among Polish patriotic forces as well as renown and admiration

throughout Europe. After years of braving insurmountable odds, however,

Pulaski and his fellow freedom fighters were overwhelmed by enemy forces.

Undaunted, he continued to battle for Poland’s freedom while in exile

in Turkey and France.

Impressed by Pulaski’s military record and reverence for freedom, Benjamin

Franklin wrote from his post in Paris to George Washington and succeeded

in helping Pulaski secure a commission in the Continental Army. As a

result of Pulaski’s brave and able conduct at the battle of Brandywine

Creek in 1777, the Continental Congress granted him a Brigadier General

commission and the command of all Continental Army cavalry forces. For

the next 2 years, General Pulaski contributed much to the American cause

in the Revolutionary War through his battlefield expertise, mastery of cavalry

tactics, and extraordinary courage. On October 9, 1779, Pulaski was gravely

wounded at the siege of Savannah while leading patriot forces against fire

from enemy batteries. He died 2 days later, far from his beloved homeland

and mourned by the brave Americans whose cause he had made his own.

Today, as both the United States and Poland enjoy freedom and growing

prosperity and look forward to a bright future as friends and NATO allies,

we remember with profound appreciation Casimir Pulaski’s resolve and

sacrifice and the generations of Poles and Americans like him who valiantly

fought to secure the peace and liberty we enjoy today.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Wednesday, October

11, 2000, as General Pulaski Memorial Day. I encourage all Americans to

commemorate this occasion with appropriate programs and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this tenth day of

October, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence

[FR Doc. 00–26540

Filed 10–12–00; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.

œ–
Exhibit 99.1    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   Board of Directors The Standard Register Company Dayton, Ohio  We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company as of April 4, 2010, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and the related consolidated statement of cash flows for the thirteen week periods ended April 4, 2010 and March 29, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.  Based upon our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company as of January 3, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 11, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of January 3, 2010 is fairly stated, in all material respects.   /S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP   Dayton, Ohio May 3, 2010
Order entered September 11 , 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00240

- CV

TIFFANY POLLARD, IND IVIDUALLY AND AS TRU STEE OF THE

M ARIE MERKEL CHILDREN ’S TRUST, App ellant

V.

RUPERT M. POLLARD, Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 12515



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 10, 2019 unopposed motion for an extension of

time to file her reply br ief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to October 17, 2019

.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### GANT v. STATE.

No. 26382.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 22, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for assault with intent to murder without' malice; the punishment one year in the penitentiary.

Appellant shot his wife with a .22 pistol, one shot striking her in the arm and the other penetrating her intestines.

The jury -rejected appellant’s claim of self-defense and lack of intent to- kill, but resolved the issue of malice against the state and assessed the minimum punishment.

The sole exception relates to the closing argument of state’s counsel, the contention being that certain testimony was misquoted.

In the light of the evidence adduced and the -punishment assessed the- argument, if improper, would not call for. reversal. -

The judgment is affirmed. -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Third Quarter 1998 Financial Data Schedule
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              41
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      375
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   923
<PP&E>                                          32,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,633
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,519
<BONDS>                                          2,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               28
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,179
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,961
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    169
<INCOME-TAX>                                        82
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 87
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        87
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99(i)(1)


           CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of 7-Eleven, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, James W. Keyes, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, as required by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



                              /s/ James W. Keyes
                              ---------------------
                              James W. Keyes
                              President and Chief Executive Officer
                              7-Eleven, Inc.

















                                   Tab 3
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Charles M. Weaver, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Motorola Debenture-Backed Series
          2002-12 Trust (the "Trust") and all reports on Form 8-K containing
          distribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed in respect of
          periods included in the year covered by this annual report of the
          Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
          report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
          pooling and servicing or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
          reports is included in these reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
          required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
          the Depositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
          that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 21, 2007


         /s/ CHARLES M. WEAVER
----------------------------------------
Charles M. Weaver, Senior Vice President
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10076

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DUSTIN PULIDO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-249-4

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Dustin Pulido raises an 

argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Hernandez, 633 

F.3d 370, 374 (5th Cir. 2011), which held that a sentence within the statutory 

maximum that is based upon judge-found facts does not violate the Sixth 

Amendment. Accordingly, the unopposed motion for summary disposition is 

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 4, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-10076 Document: 00512825384 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2667 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2667

To delay the application of the employer health insurance mandate, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2013

    Mr. Griffin of Arkansas (for himself, Mr. Young of Indiana, Mr. 
  Boustany, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mrs. Black, Mr. Camp, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. 
  Roskam, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Sam 
  Johnson of Texas, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Price of 
 Georgia, Mr. Reichert, Mr. Renacci, Ms. Jenkins, Mr. Schock, Mr. Ryan 
of Wisconsin, Mr. Reed, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Paulsen, and Mrs. Blackburn) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To delay the application of the employer health insurance mandate, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Authority for Mandate Delay Act''.

SEC. 2. DELAY IN APPLICATION OF EMPLOYER HEALTH INSURANCE MANDATE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1513(d) of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act is amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2014''.
    (b) Reporting Requirements.--
            (1) Reporting by employers.--Section 1514(d) of the Patient 
        Protection and Affordable Care Act is amended by striking 
        ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2014''.
            (2) Reporting by insurance providers.--Section 1502(e) of 
        the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is amended by 
        striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2014''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the provision of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act to which they relate.
                                 <all>
```