alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Mark W. Blodgett, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StockerYale, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: August 15, 2005                
|                                     
|/s/ Mark W. Blodgett                 
|Mark W. Blodgett                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elizabeth Arden, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Scott Beattie, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Stephen J. Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(i)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Date:  November 8, 2007 |  | /s/ E. Scott Beattie                                                 
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |                                                                      
|                        |  | E. Scott Beattie
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer     
|                        |  |                                                                      
|                        |  |                                                                      
|Date:  November 8, 2007 |  | /s/ Stephen J. Smith                                                 
|                        |  |                                                                      
|                        |  | Stephen J. Smith
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  |                                                                      





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5617 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5617

  To extend the temporary reduction of duty on certain footwear with 
                      uppers of vegetable fibers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

 Ms. Jenkins introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary reduction of duty on certain footwear with 
                      uppers of vegetable fibers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR WITH UPPERS OF VEGETABLE FIBERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.13.92 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain footwear with uppers 
of vegetable fibers) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
2/27/1012 Morongo Comment Letter - received 4/9/2012 Elizabeth Palma to: palma.elizabeth 04/10/2012 01:20 PM

Correspondence and Comment Letter for Docket No: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476 Morongo Band of Mission Indians regarding intended designation of areas of Indian Country for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS

From: Colleen McKaughan/R9/USEPA/US To: Kristin Riha/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Anita Lee/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Gwen Yoshimura/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, JohnJ Kelly/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Ken Israels/R9/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 04/10/2012 10:58 AM Subject: Fw: Morongo comment letter

We got the missing letter from Liz Bodanski of Morongo yesterday. This is the first time that we have seen it. Consequently, I would put her email and the attached letter in the record. The email documents that we received the letter from the tribe yesterday, not on February 27th.

Colleen W. McKaughan Associate Director, Air Division USEPA, Region 9 (520) 498-0118

----- Forwarded by Colleen McKaughan/R9/USEPA/US on 04/10/2012 07:52 AM -----

From: Liz Bogdanski <LBogdanski@morongo-nsn.gov> To: Colleen McKaughan/R9/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Jeff R. Keohane" < j eff@gformanlaw.com>, JohnDunlap < j ohn@dunlapgrp.com>, "Mark St. Angelo" <MStAngelo@morongo-nsn.gov>, Wienke Tax/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Jefferson Wehling/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, James Payne <JPayne@morongo-nsn.gov> Date: 04/09/2012 03:32 PM Subject: Morongo comment letter

Hi Colleen, Please find attached Morongo’s comment letter dated February 27, 2012 regarding EPA’s revised eight hour ozone standards for your records.

Liz Bogdanski, Director Morongo Environmental Protection Department 12700 Pumarra Road Banning, CA 92220 951

‐ 755

‐ 5271 951

‐ 316

‐ 1024 cell http :// morongonation

. morongo

. org
Exhibit
10.16


 


Explanatory
Note: This document has been translated from the Chinese-language original for reference purposes only. While this English translation
is believed to be generally accurate, it is subject to, and qualified by, in its entirety, the Chinese-language original. Such Chinese-language
original shall be the controlling document for all purposes.


 


Purchase
Advance Payment Contract


 


Party
A (payer): Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party
B (Payee): Wulongshan Family Farm of Tangchi Town, Shucheng County


 


Party
B is Party A’s raw material supplier. In order to reduce operating costs and enhance the partnership between the two parties, Party
A agrees to prepay certain prices for the purchase of corresponding raw materials for Party B’s obligation to provide Party A with
Camellia seeds. After full negotiation by both parties, the following contracts have been concluded:


 


1.
Purpose of advance payment: Party B can only use the advance payment paid by Party A to purchase camellia seed raw materials, and shall
not use it for other purposes.


 


2.
Prepaid amount: RMB 8,000,000


 


3.
As Party B’s business scope also involves Camellia seed oil, Party A may also provide Party B with Camellia seed oil of the same
value as the advance payment to offset the advance payment. The price of Camellia seed oil shall be in accordance with Party A’s
regulations.


 


4.
Repayment method: Party B will deduct the advance payment in the form of Camellia seeds or equivalent currency to Party A. The repayment
period shall not exceed twelve months per year, and special circumstances shall be negotiated separately.


 


5.
Party B promises to provide Party A with Camellia Seeds at a price that is 2% lower than the actual price of Camellia Seeds on the actual
delivery date. After the prepayment is deducted, the settlement will be based on the actual market price.


 


6.
If Party B fails to use the advance payment as required by the agreement, Party A has the right to recover the advance payment and impose
a penalty interest of three thousandths per day for the breached part.


 


7.
For matters not covered, the two parties can negotiate and conclude a supplementary contract. The supplementary contract has the same
legal effect as this contract. Any party who fails to negotiate can bring a lawsuit to the people’s court in China.


 


8.
This contract is valid for one year, and it will automatically terminate when it expires.


 


9.
This contract has two copies, with each party holding one copy, and it will take effect from the date of signing.


 


/s/
Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party
A: Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Date:
May 15, 2020


 


/s/
Wulongshan Family Farm, Tangchi Town, Shucheng County


Party
B: Wulongshan Family Farm of Tangchi Town, Shucheng County


Date:
May 15, 2020
#### HOBBS v. STATE.

No. 24676.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 8, 1950.

Allen Locke & Kouri, and W. Taz Locke, Wichita Falls, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Two complaints were filed against appellant, each of which contains two counts. In Cause No. 30,871, J. L. Coleman signed a complaint charging that appellant made an assault on him by shooting at him with a pistol. The second count in the same complaint alleges that appellant rudely displayed a deadly weapon, to-wit: a pistol in a public place.

In Cause No. 30,876 it is alleged that appellant made an assault on J. D. Chandler by shooting at him with a pistol. A second count charges him with rudely displaying a weapon in the same language.

When the cases were called for trial appellant asked that the two cases be consolidated and tried together. A jury was empaneled and, at the close of the evidence, the court instructed the jury, submitting to them both counts in each of the two complaints. The jury returned its verdict in which they assessed the maximum penalty of $25.00 fine on each of the two assault charges and $50.00 on each of the two charges under the second counts of the complaints. We think that each of the two complaints correctly charged an assault and that each is sustained by the evidence of the case.

The second count in each complaint charges that the pistol was rudely displayed in and near Lake Wichita Pavilion. This is not a public place per se and the State offered no evidence to show that the public resorted to such place. In fact, no evidence was offered whatsoever as to the nature of the place and it is not made clear as to any fact supporting such allegation. Consequently, the conviction on the two counts of rudely displaying a pistol at a public place is not sustained by the evidence.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as to the two counts assessing a fine of $25.00 each, for assault, and is reversed as to the two counts charging that he rudely displayed a pistol in a public place.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1993
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1993
<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              209
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          233
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
                                               


</TABLE>
Partner

 Exhibit 4.9
​
AMENDMENT TO
TIMBER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
2020 OMNIBUS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
 
Dated: April 20, 2021
 
This Amendment amends the Timber Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2020 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.
 
R E C I T A L S
 
WHEREAS, Section 17.2 of the Plan reserves to the Board of Directors (“Board”) of Timber Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) the right to amend the Plan from time to time; and
 
WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan in the manner hereinafter provided subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders.
 
NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
 
1.    Amendments.
 
1.1  Section 4.1(a) of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:
 
“(a)    Subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 4.3 and any other applicable provisions hereof, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued under all Awards granted to Participants under the Plan shall be 4,668,319 shares; all of which may, but need not, be issued in respect of Incentive Stock Options.”
 
1.2  The last sentence of Section 17.2 of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:
 
“The Plan will continue in effect until terminated in accordance with this Section 17.2; provided, however, that no Award will be granted hereunder on or after the 10th anniversary of the date of the Board’s adoption of the initial Plan amendment (the “Expiration Date”); but provided further, that Awards granted prior to such Expiration Date may extend beyond that date.”
​
2.    No Other Changes.    Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect without modification.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Company, has executed this Amendment as of the date first above written as evidence of its adoption by the Company.
 
	 
	TIMBER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ John Koconis

	 
	 
	Name: John Koconis

	 
	 
	Title:   Chief Executive Officer

	​
	​
	​



​

​
<PAGE>



                        SEQUA CORPORATION

     AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 1998 KEY EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION PLAN



     This Amendment No. 2 ("Amendment No. 2"), dated as of March 30, 2000, to
     the 1998 Key Employees Stock Option Plan, effective as of February 26,
     1998 (the "Plan"), as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Plan, effective as
     of May 1, 1998 (the Plan, as so amended is hereinafter referred to as
     the "Plan").

                           WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS, Sequa Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company")
     maintains the Plan; and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan and may amend the Plan
     pursuant to Section 8 thereof;

     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of March 30, 2000, subject to the approval of
     these Amendments by a majority of votes cast at the annual meeting of
     stockholders of the Company held in 2000, provided that the total vote
     cast represents over fifty percent (50%) in interest of all stock of
     the Company entitled to vote, the Company hereby amends the Plan, as
     set forth below.

     1.   Section 3 is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by the
          following:

          "Except as provided in subparagraph 7(h) and paragraph 8 hereof, the
          number of shares that may be issued or transferred pursuant to the
          exercise of options shall not exceed 950,000 shares of the
          Company's Class A Common Stock, no par value ("Class A Common
          Stock").  Such shares may be authorized and unissued shares or
          previously issued shares acquired or to be acquired by the
          Company and held in treasury.  Any share subject to an option
          which for any reason expires or is terminated unexercised as to such
          share may again be subject to an option under the Plan."


<PAGE>


     2.   Section 7(g) is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by the
          following:

          "(g) Maximum Option Grants.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary,
          but

               ---------------------
          except as provided in subparagraph 7(h) hereof, in no event shall the
          maximum aggregate number of shares granted hereunder to any employee
          exceed 200,000 shares during the term of the Plan."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 to the Plan is hereby executed as
     of the date first written above.


                                   SEQUA CORPORATION




                                   By:/s/ Howard M. Leitner___________
                                      ---------------------
                                      Howard M. Leitner
                                      Senior Vice President
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-10443

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00293-WS-C-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

CAMERON BRYANT HARRIS, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(October 21, 2013)

Before CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 13-10443 Date Filed: 10/21/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Cameron Harris in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that 

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Harris’s conviction and sentence 

are AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-10443 Date Filed: 10/21/2013 Page: 2 of 2
#### PEDDERSEN v. STATE.

No. 26491.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 17, 1953.

*223No attorney on appeal for appellant.

William H. Scott, Crim. Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Upon his plea of guilty before the court of the offense of robbery, appellant’s punishment was fixed at twenty years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts or bills of exception accompany the record.

The proceedings necessary to waive trial by jury and to enter a plea of guilty before the court appear to have been complied with.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.