alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Take notice that on January 27, 2000, Florida Gas Transmission Company (FGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to become effective March 1, 2000:

Twenty-Ninth Revised Sheet No. 8A.01

                    FGT states that on August 5, 1997, FGT filed a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (Settlement) in Docket Nos. RP96-366,                     *et al.*                     resolving all issues in this rate proceeding. Pursuant to Article XIII, the Settlement became effective upon the first day of the first month following the issuance of a final Commission order. On September 24, 1997, the Commissiion issued an order approving the Settlement. Because no party requested rehearing as of October 24, 1997, the Settlement became effective November 1, 1997.                

FGT states that the Settlement, among other provisions, provided that the Rate Schedule FTS-2 rates for transportation service through FGT's incremental expansion capacity would be tiered the filed rate would be effective from March 1, 1997 through February 28, 1999 with decreases becoming effective March 1, 1999 and March 1, 2000. Tariff Sheet 8A.01, which contains the Rate Schedule FTS-2 rates, reflected the Settlement rates for all three periods for FTS-2 service, with the decreases becoming effective March 1, 1999 and March 1, 2000 contained in a footnote.

FGT states that it is making the instant filing to replace the FTS-2 rates which are effective from March 1, 1999 through February 28, 2000 with the reservation and usage rates which become effective March 1, 2000. The reservation and usage rates which become effective March 1, 2000 are contained in footnote 1 on the currently effective sheet No. 8A.01.

                    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make                     Start Printed Page 5864                    protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-2659 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit ‘D’

Subject to Protective Order. Provided to Court for in camera review pursuant to 

Order. 

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 110-4 Filed 10/14/22 Page 1 of 1
Document

EXHIBIT 10.1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AWARD NOTICE
AND
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
CHEWY, INC.
2019 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN


July 22, 2021
    This First Amendment to the Award Notice and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, by and between Chewy, Inc. (the “Company”) and J.K. Symancyk (the “Participant”), is entered into as of the date hereof, pursuant to the Chewy, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). Capitalized terms used herein but otherwise defined have the meaning assigned to them in the Plan. 
    WHEREAS, on June 18, 2019, Participant was granted an award of Restricted Stock Units pursuant to the Plan under that certain Award Notice and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of June 18, 2019, by and between the Company and the Participant (the “Agreement”); and
    WHEREAS, the Participant and the Company hereby desire to amend certain provisions of the Agreement.
    NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Participant agree as follows: 
1.Section 1 of the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement portion of the Agreement is amended to add the following definitions in proper alphabetical order: 
“Service” or “Service with the Company” means (i) the period during which the Participant is employed by the Company or PetSmart LLC, or its subsidiaries, parents or successors (“PetSmart”), whether or not PetSmart is an Affiliate of Chewy, or (ii) the period during which the Participant is a member of the Board of Directors.
2.Except as otherwise provided herein, the Agreement shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect. 


1






    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first written above. 
CHEWY, INC.


												
		By:		/s/ Sumit Singh
	 	 	 	Sumit Singh
	 	 	 	Chief Executive Officer
				




 Acknowledge and agreed as of the date first written above:


												
	/s/ J.K. Symancyk			
	Participant Signature: J.K. Symancyk 			
	 			
				


2
#### FLOWERS v. STATE.

No. 23639.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1947.

*540For former opinion, see 202 S.W.2d 462.

H. S. Beard and Joe W. Taylor, both of Waco, for appellant.

Gene Maddin, Dist. Atty., and Stansell Bryan, Sp. Pros., both of Waco, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant has filed a motion praying that the judgment and sentence in this cause be reformed and corrected. He has pointed out that the judgment and sentence do not follow the verdict of the jury, which found him guilty as charged in the second count of the indictment and assessed his punishment at five years in the penitentiary; whereas, the judgment of the court and the sentence declare him to be guilty of driving an automobile upon a public highway in McLennan County while intoxicated. The judgment should have found him guilty of killing Elizabeth Phillips while driving an automobile in an intoxicated condition. In accordance with the prayer to this effect, it is hereby ordered that the judgment and sentence be reformed to show the proper offense for which conviction is had.

It is further contended that under the operation of Article 44 of the Penal Code, appellant could only be given a two-year sentence. We call attention to the fact that appellant was tried under a special statute, being Article 802c, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., which provides that he shall receive the punishment assessed for the felony actually committed. Under the doctrine that a special statute controls over a general statute, the jury had a right to assess a penalty of five years in the penitentiary and the judgment and sentence will not be changed as to the length of time liá-is to serve.
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

July 12, 2024 SC-2024-0303 Ex parte Leonard Lamar Gravesande. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: Leonard Lamar Gravesande v. State of Alabama) (Mobile Circuit Court: CC-18-2242; Criminal Appeals: CR-2023-0157).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on July 12, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Shaw, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Bryan, Mendheim, and Mitchell, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5648 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5648

   To repeal an obsolete provision in title 49, United States Code, 
           requiring motor vehicle insurance cost reporting.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Owens (for himself and Mr. Harper) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal an obsolete provision in title 49, United States Code, 
           requiring motor vehicle insurance cost reporting.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    Section 32302(c) of title 49, United States Code, is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
1 

3853034-1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

BRYNNE SOUKUP § 

Plaintiff § 

§ 

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-648-RP 

§ 

FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. and § 

FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS, LLC § 

Defendants § 

§ 

O R D E R

BE IT REMEMBERED on this ____ day of _____________, 2021, there was presented to 

the Court the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed by Thomas P. Marotta (“Applicant”), 

counsel for Flight Services & Systems, LLC and the Court, having reviewed the motion, enters the 

following order: 

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED, and 

Applicant may appear on behalf of Flight Services & Systems, LLC in the above case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if Applicant has not already done so, shall, 

in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2), immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made 

payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, pursuant to the Administrative Policies and 

Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal cases in the Western District of Texas, shall 

register as a filing user within 10 days of the date of this Order. 

Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 38-1 Filed 06/15/21 Page 1 of 2
2 

3853034-1 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Applicant’s Pro Hac Vice status shall not become 

effective until Applicant has complied with all provisions of this Order. 

SIGNED this ____ day of __________, 2021. 

__________________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 38-1 Filed 06/15/21 Page 2 of 2
*

After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is

unnecessary.  Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record.  See FED. R. APP. P.

34(a)(2).

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted December 8, 2009*

  Decided December 8, 2009

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 09‐1973

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

BRIAN K. MCMUTUARY,

Defendant‐Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 97 CR 25‐1

Elaine E. Bucklo,

Judge.

O R D E R

Brian McMutuary helped two accomplices rob the bank where he worked of

$277,000.  McMutuary had access to the vault and knew when currency shipments arrived,

so the district court assessed a 2‐level upward adjustment for abuse of a position of trust.

See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3.  The court sentenced McMutuary to a total of 195 months’

imprisonment, and we affirmed the judgment on direct appeal.  See United States v.

McMutuary, 217 F.3d 477 (7th Cir. 2000).  McMutuary later filed a motion under 18 U.S.C.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

 Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 09‐1973 Page 2

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduced sentence; he claimed that after Amendment 580, which revised the

commentary to § 3B1.3, he no longer would be subject to the increase for abuse of a position

of trust.  The district court concluded that it lacked authority to grant relief, and McMutuary

appeals that decision.

Amendment 580 took effect in 1998 after McMutuary’s sentencing.  The amendment

resolved a circuit split and adopted the majority view that defendants who deceived their

victims by pretending to hold positions of trust they did not occupy are equally deserving

of the 2‐level increase.  See U.S.S.G. app. C, vol. 2 at 12‐13 (2003) (Amendment 580).  The

Sentencing Commission also used the opportunity to sharpen the language of the existing

commentary; one change was to say that § 3B1.3 “does not”—instead of “would

not”—apply to an ordinary bank teller.  Id.  The substitution of would for does, says

McMutuary, made the adjustment inapplicable to him.

That contention is frivolous, but also irrelevant.  The Sentencing Commission alone

decides which amendments will apply retroactively, see 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and the

Commission exercises that power by listing retroactive amendments exhaustively in

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c).  Braxton v. United States, 500 U.S. 344, 348 (1991); United States v.

Cunningham, 554 F.3d 703, 708 (7th Cir. 2009).  Amendment 580 is not listed, and thus

McMutuary cannot benefit from it.

AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 23, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 23, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0031. ANITA-RAE PANKEY JOYNER AS TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CAESAR-TITUS ALLEN PANKEY v. NAVICENT HEALTH BALDWIN, INC et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 20SCCV091781
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 18-0138V 

 Filed: May 28, 2019 

UNPUBLISHED 

STEVEN STREETER, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Respondent. 

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; 

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) 

   

Patricia Ann Finn, Patricia Finn, P.C., Nanuet, NY, for petitioner. 

Mollie Danielle Gorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On January 29, 2018, Steven Streeter (“petitioner”) filed a petition for 

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 

§300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he received an 

influenza (“flu”) vaccine on January 19, 2016, and subsequently suffered from GuillainBarré syndrome (“GBS”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special 

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On May 28, 2019, respondent filed a combined Rule 4(c) report and Proffer on 

Damages in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. 

Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report/Proffer at 1. Specifically, respondent states that 

                                                            

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This 

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine 

Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the 

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned 

agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from 

public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in 

accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management 

and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. 
2

“[b]ased on the medical records . . . petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the 

revised Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation, which 

afford petitioners a presumption of causation if onset of GBS occurs between three and 

forty-two days after receipt of a seasonal flu vaccination and there is no apparent 

alternative cause.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that the medical records 

demonstrate that petitioner has experienced the residual effects of his GBS for more 

than six months and therefore, has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation 

under the Act. Id. 

 In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of The Stephan Co. (the "Company) on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert C. Spindler,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      Robert C. SpindlerRobert
      C. SpindlerChief
      Financial OfficerDecember
      7,
2009
#### WELLS v. STATE.

No. 26002.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*199GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area. The punishment assessed is a fine of $500.

The complaint and information, as well as all other matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 12.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, James Ratcliffe, Chairman of Ineos Group Limited, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Ineos Group Limited; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant, as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis annual report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisannual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the periodcovered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this annual report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summariseand report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
**Date:**  **June 25, 2004**        /s/ James Ratcliffe James Ratcliffe  Chairman
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
CREDIT CORPORATION Michael J. Gillespie



Accounting Director Officers Certificate  Pursuant to the Servicing Agreement between Morgan
Stanley Dean Witter Credit Corporation, formerly
known as NOVUS Financial Corporation, as seller
and servicer (referred to herein in such capacity
as the Servicer, and Redwood Trust, Inc., as
Owner, the undersigned, hereby states that: (1) A review of the activities of the
Servicer and of its performance under the
Servicing Agreement during the calendar year
ended December 31, 2003 has been made
under my supervision; and (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on
such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement
throughout such period. MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 
CREDIT CORPORATIONBy
    /s/ Douglas J. Bush

      Douglas J. BushTitle
    DirectorDated as of December 31, 2003
 BY

    /s/ David Bianucci
      David BianucciTitle

    Vice PresidentDated as of December 31, 2003
 2500 Lake Cook Road, J
East, Riverwoods, Illinois 60015 Tel (224) 405-1903