alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of StockerYale, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark W.
Blodgett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark W. Blodgett                 
|Mark W. Blodgett                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|August 10, 2007
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LICENSE AGREEMENT
 Amendment Amendment Effective
Date Alseres th BA Parties
 Background
 License Agreement
 Option Agreement Option
    Definitions
 Minimum Terms
 Sublicense Agreement
 Sublicense Period




---



##### 



Diligence
    Sublicense Period
  Reporting and Cooperation




---



##### 



Financial Provisions
 Sublicense Income
 Termination
   Default
  Failure to Enter Sublicense Agreement




---



##### 



Effect of Termination
 Option Agreement.




---



##### 



Releases Released Parties
 Public Announcements
 Miscellaneous




---



##### 








---



##### 



ALSERES PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:
    /s/ Kenneth L. Rice, Jr.Title: EVP and CFOBIOAXONE THERAPEUTIC, INC.By:
    /s/ illegibleTitle:  Founder and Board Member
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-571-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Please take notice that attorney Brian M. Koide of the law firm ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, 

PLLC appears as counsel of record for Plaintiff WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT. Mr. Koide hereby requests that all notices required to be 

given, and all papers required to be served in the above-entitled and numbered cause, be copied 

to and served upon him.

Dated: November 3, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Brian M. Koide

Brian M. Koide 

Virginia Bar No. 46,329

ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Telephone: (703) 565-2852

Facsimile: (817) 887-5950 

brian@etheridgelaw.com

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 29 Filed 11/03/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document was served upon all counsel of record via the 

Court's CM/ECF electronic filing system in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure on November 3, 2020.

/s/ Brian M. Koide

Brian M. Koide

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 29 Filed 11/03/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of 99 Cent Stuff, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Raymond Zimmerman, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Barry Bilmes, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-OxlEy Act of 2002, that, to the
best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Raymond Zimmerman
---------------------
Name:  Raymond Zimmerman
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 25, 2004

/s/ Barry Bilmes
----------------
Name:  Barry Bilmes
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 25, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 26689.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 16, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.-

*723BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted upon two separate counts in the complaint and information for the unlawful sale of whiskey in a dry area, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $125 on each count.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
  SECTION
            906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 I,
        Kenneth L. Johnson, Treasurer of St. Joseph, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of St. Joseph, Inc.,
        for the
        fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements
        of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
        78m or
        78o(d)) and that information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of St. Joseph, Inc.
 Date:
                  April 17, 2007By:*/s/*Kenneth L. Johnson
                
                Name:
                  Kenneth L. JohnsonTitle:
                  Treasurer
  28
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,847
<PP&E>                                          43,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,662)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,468
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            91
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,702
<SALES>                                          6,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,264
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,909
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,627
<INCOME-TAX>                                       965
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,662
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Howard Simmons, Appellant.

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:ACACP Implementation of 2014 Recommendations And Update on 2012 Recommendations, Department of Transportation Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6194
EDSON FURTADO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:07-cv-02755-RDB) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Furtado’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. Montgomery County, Md. , No. 1:07-cv-02755-RDB (D. Md. filed Jan. 14, 2008 & entered Jan. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
WARRANT AMENDMENT – B WARRANTS
​
This WARRANT AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) entered into as of the ___ day of August, 2021 by and between GENERAL CANNABIS CORP, a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), and the party set forth in the signature line below (“Holder”).
​
Recitals:
​
WHEREAS, pursuant to a warrant previously issued in connection with the Company’s 15% note offering (“Warrant Agreement”), the Company granted to Holder warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), in the amount set forth in the signature block below (“B Warrants”).
​
WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend certain terms and conditions of the B Warrants as provided herein.
​
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and other good and valuable consideration, the Company and Holder hereby agree as follows:
​
		1.	Defined Terms.  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Warrant Agreement.

​
		2.	Extension of Expiration Date.  The Expiration Date is hereby amended to be December 31, 2024.

​
		3.	Purchase Price.  The Purchase Price is hereby amended to be $1.00 per Warrant Share.

​
		4.	Adjustments/Anti-Dilution.  For the purpose of clarity, notwithstanding anything contained in the Warrant Agreement or any other agreement (oral or written), the only permitted adjustments to the Purchase Price or the number of Warrant Shares issuable to Holder shall be as expressly set forth in Section 3 or 3.1 of the Warrant Agreement, as applicable – “Stock Dividends, Splits” and no ‘anti-dilution’ or other similar adjustments (whether pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Warrant Agreement or otherwise) shall be permitted or applicable to the B Warrants as amended herein.

​
		5.	Remaining Provisions.  All terms and conditions contained in the Warrant Agreement not amended pursuant to this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect as set forth therein.

​
		6.	Miscellaneous.  This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Colorado without giving effect to principles of conflicts or choice of laws thereof.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed and original, and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.  This Amendment may be executed and delivered via email PDF or similar electronic delivery.

​



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above and with respect to the number of B Warrants set forth below.
​
GENERAL CANNABIS CORP
​
​
By:  _____________________________
Name:Adam Hershey
Title:Interim CEO
​
​
Holder:
​
​
____________________________
​
Print Name:
Address:
​
​
​
Number of B Warrants:  ____________
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 48969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20118]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURE TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  10 a.m., Friday September 28, 2012.

PLACE:  1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-
5084.

Sauntia Warfield
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-20118 Filed 8-13-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               5
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1377
<PP&E>                                             509
<DEPRECIATION>                                     137
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              200
<BONDS>                                              2
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         15
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                        1485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1757
<SALES>                                            869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   869
<CGS>                                              408
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    212
<INCOME-TAX>                                        82
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                131
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       131
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
File attached to email: Goldsborough_Marin_PM25_Monitoring_2010-11_MemoFigs.doc
#### GOODMAN v. STATE.

No. 23113.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 2, 1945.

Letcher D. King, of Abilene, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for driving while intoxicated, with a sentence of thirty days in the county jail.

The appellant had a collision with a taxi cab in Abilene on July 29, 1944. H. E. Sanderson, the owner of the taxi cab company, was called as a witness and testified that he went to the scene of the accident, talked with the appellant, and observed his conduct. It was his opinion that the accused was intoxicated. An officer who was called to the scene gave like testimony. The evidence sufficiently supports the jury’s verdict.

 We find one bill of exception in the record complaining of the action of the court in overruling appellant’s second motion for continuance. By it the appellant sought a continuance for the purpose of securing the attendance of a witness who had permanently removed from the county and who admittedly had not established another place of residence. His whereabouts was unknown. There was no representation that he would be able to have the evidence of the witness at' a subsequent term of court. Whether or not he used diligence in securing the evidence of the absent witness was a matter for the determination of the trial court under the circumstances of the case. The action of the trial court in overruling the motion for continuance was justified under the circumstances.

We find no irregularities in the trial of the case and, accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

SAMUEL YAZZIE WEBB, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 18-0684 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2009-157140-001

The Honorable Joseph C. Kreamer, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Samuel Yazzie Webb, Tucson

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Diane M. Johnsen, Judge Michael J. Brown and Judge 

Jennifer M. Perkins delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 1-17-2019
STATE v. WEBB

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Samuel Yazzie Webb seeks review of the superior 

court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's first 

petition. 

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 

2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. Petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. 

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review but deny relief.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 
 
 *Title:*
                     Annual Survey of Refugees (ASR). *OMB No.:*
                     0970-0033. *Description:*
                     The Refugee Act of 1980, and the Refugee Assistance amendments enacted in 1982 and 1986, stress the achievement of employment and self-sufficiency by refugees as soon as possible after their arrival in the U.S. The Annual Survey of Refugees collects information on the economic circumstances of a random sample of refugees, Amerasians, and entrants who arrived in the U.S. during the previous five years focusing on their education, training, labor force participation, and welfare utilization rates. From their responses, ORR reports on the economic adjustment of refugees to the American economy. These data are used by Congress in its annual deliberations of refugee admissions and funding and by program managers in formulating policies for the future direction of the Refugee Resettlement Program. *Respondents:*
                     Approximately 2,000 refugees. Annual Burden Estimates
Instrument
Number of 
                             respondents
Number of 
                             responses per respondents
Average burden hours per response
Total burden hoursASR Telephone Survey
2,000
1
40 minutes
1,350Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:



1,350
 *Additional Information:*
                     Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. *OMB Comment:*
                     OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attn: Desk Officer for ACF. Dated: October 11, 2000. Bob Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. 00-26657  Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-M