# Patent

## Title
Purification, cloning and biochemical characterization of XendoU, endoribonucleasic activity involved in small nuclear RNA splicing-independent biosynthesis in Xenopus laevis

## Abstract

Cloning and characterization of the gene for Mn++ dependent RNA-sc endoribonucleasic activity able to generate 2′-3′ cyclic phosphate and 5′OH ends.

## Background
Endoribonucleases play essential role in RNA metabolism participating both in “degradative” pathways, such as mRNA decay (Schoenberg and Chemokaiskaya, 1997), and in “maturative” pathways, to generate functional RNA molecules from primary transcripts. Only a few endoribonucleases have been isolated in eukaryotes, most of them being involved in biosynthesis of translation apparatus components. Among these, there are ribonucleoprotein enzymes, such as RNase P and RNase MRP, which act as site-specific endoribonucleases; RNase P is involved in generation of the 5′ end of tRNAs (Nashimoto, 1995), whereas RNase MRP is implicated in processing of pre-rRNA (Lygerou et al., 1996). Other endonucleolytic activities, as 3′-tRNase, tRNA splicing endonuclease and members of RNase III family (Trotta et al., 1997; Bujnicki and Rychlewski, 2000; Zamore, 2001) are protein enzymes. 3′-tRNase is an eukaryotic spermidine-dependent endoribonuclease which precisely removes the 3′-end tail from tRNA precursors (Castano et al., 1985; Nashimoto, 1995). tRNAs splicing endoribonucleases are required for the intron removal from pre-tRNAs: it is an Mg++-dependent enzyme and cleaves pre-tRNAs at 5′ and 3′ splice sites, releasing products having 2′-3′ cyclic phosphate and 5′OH ends (Peebles et al., 1983) RNases III are endoribonucleases acting on double-strand RNA found in bacteria and eukaryotes: they were first isolated in E. coli (Court, 1993; Nicholson, 1997) and subsequently eukaryotic orthologs were identified on the basis of sequence similarity. S. cerevisiae RNase III (Rnt1p), was shown to be involved in several biosynthetic events such as pre-rRNAs, snRNAs and snoRNAs processing (Elela et al., 1996; Kufel et al., 1999; Chanfreau et al., 1997; Allmang et al., 1999; Chanfreau et al., 1998). Recently it was shown that Rnt1p is also involved in the release of the intron-encoded snoRNAs, U18 and snR38 from their pre-mRNAs (Giorgi et al., 2001). Furthermore, a new member of eukaryotic RNAses III family, named “Dicer”, has been identified in metazoa (Bemstein et al., 2001). It is known to be involved in interference (RNAi) pathway, generating 21-23 nt small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) from longer partially double stranded precursors. These processing products act in RNA-mediated gene regulation (Ambros, 2001). Cleavage by Rnase III releases 3′OH and 5′ phosphate ends and it is Mg++-dependent.
The authors of the invention previously demonstrated that an endoribonucleolytic activity plays a key role in the biosynthesis of the box C/D U16 snoRNA, encoded in the third intron of the L4 ribosomal protein gene in X. laevis (Caffarelli et al., 1994). The authors already showed that U16 processing from the host intron is alternative to the splicing reaction: thereby, synthesis of the L4 mRNA is alternative to the production of U16 snoRNA (Caffarelli et al., 1996). In this context the biosynthetic mechanism of U16, per se, regulates the expression of L4 gene at the post-transcriptional level.
The authors now purified to homogeneity from X. laevis oocyte nuclear extracts (ONE) and characterized the endonucleolytic activity (XendoU, GenBank TM/EBI Data Bank AJ507315) responsible for the processing of U16 snoRNA from its host intron. Partial protein sequencing allowed to clone XendoU cDNA, to express it and to study features of the enzyme. This protein represents a novel endoribonucleasic activity, being: i) poly-U specific, ii) single filament specific, iii) Mn++-dependent and iv) able to release cleavage products with 5′ OH and 2′-3′ cyclic phosphate ends.
Furthermore the protein represents an useful biotechnological tool showing additional advantages in comparison to known RNases like, for example, selective but non stringent substrate specificity and opportunity to obtain amounts of the recombinant protein.
Finally the inclusion of XendoU protein with endoribonucleasic activity in pharmaceutical kits containing other RNases already known for molecular analysis of nucleic acids, particularly RNA, or for the preparation of biological macromolecules, like, for example, c-DNA, genomic DNA, plasmids, recombinant proteins, allows to remedy to the limited number of commercially available Rnases and to increase selectivity and efficiency of said kits.
It is therefore an object of the present invention a nucleic acid encoding for a protein with endoribonucleasic activity which is poliU sequences and single filament specific, Mn++-dependent and releases as cleavage products molecules having 2′-3′ cyclic phosphate and 5′OH ends. Preferably nucleic acid includes substantially SEQ ID NO: 1 nucleotide sequence, functional homologs thereof or complementary sequence thereto.
It is a further object of the invention a recombinant vector able to express effectively the inventive nucleic acid in prokaryotes.
It is a further object of the invention a recombinant vector able to express effectively the inventive nucleic acid in eukaryotes.
Those skilled in the art will be able to recognize the most suitable vectors also considering the host organism in order to express the inventive nucleic acid.
It is a further object of the invention a protein with endoribonucleasic activity which is poly-U sequences and single filament specific, Mn++-dependent and releases RNA molecules bearing 2′,3′ cyclic phosphate and 5′OH ends as cleavage products, or functional portions thereof. Preferably the protein is encoded by inventive SEQ ID NO: 1 nucleic acid, more preferably protein substantially has SEQ ID NO: 2 amino acid sequence. Advantageously the protein is produced by synthetic or recombinant route using methods known by those skilled in the art. It is a further object of the present invention the use of the protein with endoribonucleasic activity in analytical or synthetic applications. Particularly analytical applications can be selected from the group including RNA sequencing, point mutation detection, RNA molecular digital fingerprinting determination, RNA structural analysis, Rnase protection assays.
Among the synthetic applications of the protein with endoribonucleasic activity according to the present invention there is RNA degradation for the preparation of biological molecules and particularly c-DNA, plasmid DNA, genomic DNA and recombinant proteins.
A further object of the present invention is the use of the protein with endoribonucleasic activity for the preparation of pharmaceutical kits for molecular analysis of nucleic acids, particularly RNA and synthesis of biological macromolecules, particularly c-DNA, plasmid DNA, genomic DNA and recombinant proteins.
Therefore pharmaceutical kits, including the protein with endoribonucleasic activity according to the present invention, suitable for the molecular analysis of nucleic acids, particularly RNA and synthesis of biological macromolecules, particularly c-DNA, plasmid DNA, genomic DNA and recombinant proteins are object of the present invention.
The invention will be now described without any limitation thereof referring to experimental procedures wherein reference will be made to the following figures:



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows activity assay and purification of XendoU. A, schematic representation of U16 snoRNA processing. P indicates U16-containing precursor (003 RNA); I-1a and I-1b represent the products generated by cleavage upstream from U16 while I-2a and I-2b represent their 3′ complementary molecules thereto; 1-3 depicts the product originated from cleavage downstream from U16 while 1-4 represent its 3′ respective complementary molecule; pre-U16 represents U16 precursor with additional 5′ and 3′ flanking sequences. Cap structure is shown as a black dot, exons as boxes, the intron as a continuous line and U16 snoRNA coding region as a thicker line. Large arrows localise the major sites of cleavage and small arrows the minor ones. B, in vitro U16 processing in unfractionated oocyte nuclear extracts (ONE) and with purified XendoU (XendoU). 32P-labelled 003 RNA was incubated for the times indicated below; RNA was then extracted and separated by 6% polyacrilamide-7M urea gel. The specific cleavage products are indicated aside. C, scheme of procedure employed for XendoU purification from ONE. D, proteins from the active fractions during the purification were separated on SDS-PAGE and visualised by Blue Coomassie staining. Numerals below refer to the corresponding purification steps schematised in panel C. The arrow points to the purified enzyme with an apparent molecular mass of 37 kDa.
FIG. 2 shows XendoU cleavage which requires Mn++ cations. 32P-labelled 003 RNA was incubated in oocyte nuclear extract (ONE) or with purified XendoU (XendoU, GeneBank TM/EBI Data Bank AJ507315) in the presence of different metal ions at a concentration of 6 mM. After 30 min, the reaction was stopped and the processing products analysed on 6% polyacrilamide-7M urea gel. In the lane—the RNA substrate was incubated with XendoU in the absence of ions. The specific cleavage products are schematised on the left side.
FIG. 3 shows that the XendoU activity is U-specific and produces 2′-3′ cyclic phosphate. A, 32P ATP labelled synthetic oligoribonucleotide PI, SEQ ID NO: 3, containing the distal cleavage site upstream from U16, and its mutant derivatives (P2, SEQ ID NO: 4; P3, SEQ ID NO: 5) were incubated with the unfractionated extract (lanes 2) or with purified XendoU (lanes 3), under standard conditions for 30 min. RNA molecules were extracted and analysed on 10% polyacrylamide-7M urea gel. In lanes 1 untreated RNA is shown, in lane M-RNA marker generated by alkaline digestion of P1 (SEQ ID NO: 3) is shown; arrows indicate cleavage sites. On the right side the sequences of the oligoribonucleotides are reported. B, The 32P-labeled 1-1 molecules, schematically represented on the left side, generated by incubation of U16-containing precursor in ONE (ONE), with purified XendoU (XendoU) or after injection in oocytes (in vivo), were gel purified, and their 3′end analysed. The molecules were incubated with 1 unit of alkaline phosphatase (lane 1) or with 10 mM HCl (lanes 2) or with alkaline phosphatase after acid treatment (lanes 3). After incubation the RNAs extracts were analysed by electrophoresis on 10% polyacrylamide-7M urea gel. Untreated molecules were run as control in lanes 4.
FIG. 4 shows cDNA (SEQ ID NO: 1) and amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO: 2) of XendoU. Nucleotides of the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions are shown in small letters, nucleotides of the ORF in capital letters. Above each codon the corresponding amino acid is shown. The sequence portions determined by automated Edman degradation and mass mapping experiments (see “Experimental Procedures”) are indicated by numbers 1, 2 and 3. The stop codon is identified by an asterisk. Numbers on the right side of diagram correspond to the amino acid residues. Underlined are the amino acid sequences identified by MALDI-mapping experiments.
FIG. 5 shows the functional analysis of in vitro translated XendoU A, SDS-PAGE analysis of [35S] Methionine-labelled XendoU (lane 2) and of control luciferase (lane 1) produced by in vitro transcription and translation. The arrow points to XendoU protein. B, 003 RNA was incubated, in the presence of Mn++ ions, in ONE (ONE), with XendoU produced by reticulocyte lysate (ret-XendoU/+Mn), or with reticulocyte lysate as such (lane ret/+Mn). As control 003 RNA was incubated, in the absence of Mn++ ions, with XendoU produced by reticulocyte lysate (lanes ret-XendoU/−Mn). The numbers below indicate incubation times: 0 min (lane 1), 45 min (lanes 2).
FIG. 6 shows that XendoU is involved in U86 snoRNA biosynthesis. A, U86 processing is analysed in vivo by injection of 32P-labelled U86-containing precursor (P) in X. laevis oocytes (lanes in vivo), or in vitro by incubation of the RNA precursor in ONE (ONE), or with purified XendoU (XendoU). The numbers below indicate different incubation times: 0 min (lane 1), 10 min (lanes 2), 45 min (lanes 3), 3 hours (lanes 4), 16 hours (lanes 5). RNA was then extracted and loaded on a 6% polyacrilamide-7M urea gel. The processing products are schematised aside. Arrows indicate specific XendoU cleavages. B, 32P-labelled UhindIII primer, depicted below, was reacted with unlabelled 1-4 molecules obtained after 10 min of incubation in oocytes (lane in vivo), 45 min of incubation in ONE (ONE) or 45 min of incubation with purified XendoU (XendoU). The products of primer extension were run in parallel with the sequence (lane G, A, T, and C) performed with the same oligonucleotide on U86. The sequence is reported on the left side (SEQ ID NO: 10): the arrow points to the XendoU cleavage sites. C, U86-containing precursor was incubated, in the presence of Mn++ ions, in ONE (ONE), with XendoU produced by reticulocyte lysate (ret-XendoU/+Mn), or with reticulocyte lysate as such (lanes ret/+Mn). As control, pre-mRNA was incubated with XendoU produced by reticulocyte lysate in the absence of Mn++ ions (ret-XendoU/−Mn\ The numbers below indicate incubation times: 0 min (lane 1), 45 min (lanes 2).



EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Massive Isolation of Oocyte Germinal Vesicles and Nuclear Extract Preparation
X. laevis germinal vesicles were isolated following the procedure by Gandini-Attardi et al. (Gandini-Attardi et al., 1990) and the nuclear extracts were prepared as already described (Caffarelli et al., 1994).
Purification of XendoU Activity
XendoU was purified from oocyte nuclear extracts (ONE). ONE was fractionated by ammonium sulphate precipitation. Solid ammonium sulphate (280 mg/ml) was slowly added to the nuclear extract up to 45% saturation and the suspension was stirred for 30′ at 4° C. and then centrifuged at 12.000 rpm for 30′ at 4° C. The supernatant was made 70% saturated by a further addition of ammonium sulphate (240 mg/ml). The suspension was stirred and centrifuged as above. The resulting pellet was dissolved in ONE buffer (25 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCI, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol) and then applied onto an hydroxyapatite column (CHT-II Econocolumn, Biorad). Column was washed with ONE buffer and then eluted with 5 column volumes of 100 mM Na-phosphate pH 7 in ONE buffer. The eluate was collected in 1 ml fractions next tested for the endonuclease activity. Selected fractions were pooled, diluted with 3 volumes of ONE buffer and applied on a Blue Sepharose column (Blue Sepharose Fast Flow Pharmacia). The column was washed with ONE buffer and then eluted with 5 column volumes of 0.2 M NaCI in ONE buffer. The eluate was then collected in 1 ml fractions; those displaying the specific activity were pooled and dialysed against ONE buffer. Protein mixture was subjected to a second fractionation on hydroxyapatite column. The elution was performed with 10 column volumes of a linear gradient 0-100 mM Na-phosphate pH 7 in ONE buffer. Collected fractions were tested and those with activity were pooled and concentrated by means of ultrafiltration device (CENTRICOMTM C10, Millipore). The concentrated fractions were then applied on a gel-filtration column (Pharmacia) previously equilibrated in ONE buffer. Elution was monitored collecting 0.5 ml fractions which were tested for specific activity.
Considering the yield of purified protein it can be assumed that XendoU represents no more than 1/1000 of the protein mass present in nuclear extract. To obtain enough protein for sequencing and characterization the described procedure was carried out on several ONE samples of 15-20 ml collecting together the final purified fractions.
Preparation and Isolation of Tryptic Peptides
Protein bands from SDS-PAGE analysis (5 μg) stained with Coomassie Blue R250 were excised, reduced with dithiothreitol and carboxamidomethylated. Gel pieces were equilibrated in 25 mM NH4HCO3, pH 8 and finally digested in situ with trypsin at 37° C. for 18 h. Peptides were extracted by sonication with 100 μl of 25 mM NH4HCO3/acetonitrile 1:1 v/v, pH 8 (twice). Peptide mixture was fractionated by reverse-phase HPLC on a VYDACTM C18 column 218TP52 (250×1 mm), 5 μm, 300 Å pore size (The Separation Group, USA) by using a linear gradient from 5% to 60% of acetonitrile in 0.1% TFA over 60 min, at flow rate of 90 μL/min. Individual components were manually collected and lyophilised.
Peptide Sequencing and Mass Spectrometry Analysis
Sequence analysis was performed using a PROCISETM 491 protein sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA) equipped with a 140C microgradient apparatus and a 785A UV detector (Applied Biosystems, USA) for the automated identification of PTH-amino acids.
Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectra were recorded using a Voyager DE-PRO mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, USA); an analytical mixture containing α-cyano-4-hydroxy-cinnamic acid was applied to the sample plate and allowed to be dried. Mass calibration was performed using the molecular ions from peptides produced by tryptic auto-proteolysis and the matrix as internal standards.
In Vitro RNA Synthesis and Oocyte Microinjection
U16-containing precursor (003 RNA), including the third intron of the L4 r-protein gene of X. laevis, was transcribed from plasmid 003 digested with HindIII (Caffarelli et al., 1994). U86-containing precursor was obtained as already described (Filippini et al., 2001). In vitro transcription reactions were performed in the presence of (32P) αUTP as described (Caffarelli et al., 1998) and pre-mRNAs were injected into nuclei of stage V1 oocytes as already described (Caffarelli et al., 1994).
In Vitro Processing Reactions
ONE assay: as described by (Caffarelli et al., 1994).
XendoU assay: the reaction mixture (25 μl) contained 3×104 cpm of (32P) labelled pre-mRNA, 6 mM MnCl2, 50 mM NaCl, 25 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT, 10 μg of E. coli tRNA, 20 U of RNAse inhibitor (PROMEGA) and 1 ng of purified XendoU. Reaction mixtures were incubated with RNA substrates at 24° C. for indicated times. The products of the reactions were analysed on 6% polyacrylamide-7M urea gels.
Substrate Specificity
The oligoribonucleotides








P1 (5′-GGAAACGUAUCCUUUGGGAG-3′),
SEQ ID NO: 3;


 


P2 (5′-GGAAACGUAUCCUUGGGAGG-3′),
SEQ ID NO: 4;


 


P3 (5′-GGAAACGUAUCCUCUGGGAG-3′),
SEQ ID NO: 5;


 


P4 (5′-GGAAACGUAUCCUGUGGGAG-3′),
SEQ ID NO: 6;






were 5′ labelled: 10 pmol of each synthetic substrate were incubated at 37° C. for 30 min, in the presence of 10 units of Polynucleotide Kinase (Roche), and 10 μCi of (32P)Y-ATP. The reaction was terminated at 65° C. for 5 min, primers were gel purified on 10% polyacrylamide-7M urea and incubated for 30 min in the presence of ONE or purified XendoU as described above. RNA was extracted and analysed on 10% polyacrylamide-denaturing gel. RNA ladder was obtained by incubation of P4 oligo (200.000 cpm) in 500 mM NaHCO3 at 90° C. for 20 min.
Analysis of 3′ Ends of Cleavage Products
32P-labelled and gel purified I-1 molecules (I-1a and I-1b generated by cleavages at the major sites a and b upstream from U16, see scheme of FIG. 1A), obtained in vitro after incubation of 003 RNA with ONE or XendoU, or in vivo after oocyte microinjection, were incubated in 10 μl of 10 mM HCl at 25° C. for 2 hours to open the cyclic phosphate as described by Forster (Forster et al., 1990). The phosphate was then removed by incubation of the RNA in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5, 0,1 mM EDTA in the presence of 1 U of calf intestine Alkaline Phosphatase at 50° C. for 60 min. The enzyme was inactivated by adding 1/10 volume of 0.2 M EGTA and the mixture heated at 65° C. for 10 min. RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform and analysed on 10% polyacrylamide-7M urea gel.
Isolation of XendoU cDNA
A X. laevis stage 28 embryo cDNA library, constructed in λZAP II vector, was screened using a specific probe obtained by PCR amplification on X. laevis cDNA with degenerated oligonucleotides (MAHs 5′-ATGGCICAYGAYTAYYTIGT-3′, SEQ ID NO: 7 and IGTa 5′-ACIGGRTAIGCIGTICCIAT-3′, SEQ ID NO: 8) designed on peptides obtained by tryptic digestion of purified XendoU.
XendoU cDNA Expression in Reticulocyte Lysate
XendoU Open Reading Frame (ORF) was cloned into BLUE SCRIPTTM vector and 35(S)Methionine-labelled protein was produced by in vitro transcription and translation using the TnT-coupled Reticulocyte Lysate System Kit (PROMEGATM) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Translational products were analysed on 10% SDS-PAGE.
Primer Extension Analysis
In vitro transcribed U86-containing precursor was obtained from a standard T7 reaction, but in the presence of 500 μM unlabelled UTP. The transcript was injected into X. laevis oocytes or incubated in ONE or with purified XendoU. The processing product I-4 RNA was gel-purified and reverse transcribed (SS pre-amplification system—GIBCO) with the 5′ terminally labeled oligonucleotide UHindIII (5′-AAGCTTCTTCATGGCGGCTCGGCCAAT-3′, SEQ ID NO: 9) complementary to 19 nucleotides at the 3′ end of the downstream exon. The elongated products were run in parallel with the sequence obtained with the same primer on U86-containing precursor.
Results
Purification of XendoU from X. laevis Oocyte Nuclear Extracts
The authors previously developed an in vitro system able to reproduce the release of U16 snoRNA from its host intron (Caffarelli et al., 1994). When 32P-labelled U16-containing precursor is incubated in X. laevis oocyte nuclear extract, in the presence of Mn++ ions, specific products, originating from endonucleolityc cleavages, are found (FIGS. 1A and 1B): the I-2 and I-1 molecules derive from cleavage upstream from U16 coding region, while I-3 and I-4 molecules are produced by cleavage downstream from U16. When double cleavage occurs on the same pre-mRNA molecule, pre-U16 products accumulate, which are then converted to the mature snoRNA by exonucleotidic digestion.
The procedure of biochemical characterization is indicated in FIG. 1C, while the protein content of the fractions displaying XendoU activity is shown in FIG. 1D. After several chromatographic steps, a single protein of 37 kDa molecular mass was obtained as showed in FIG. 1D, lane 6. The elution of XendoU activity during the last purification step on gel filtration column is consistent with a monomeric protein of 37 kDa. The assay for testing the presence of XendoU activity was performed by incubating 32P-labelled U16-containing precursor with aliquots of the different fractionation steps. FIG. 1B shows the comparison of XendoU activity of unfractionated nuclear extracts (ONE) with that of the gel filtration column (XendoU). Since previously it was demonstrated the dependence of XendoU activity on Mn++ ions, this cofactor is always present in the reaction: in both cases the same primary cleavage products, I-2 and I-3 and their complementary molecules I-1 and I-4, are generated. Primer extension analysis performed on cleavage products I-2 and I-4 revealed that the purified enzyme cleaves intronic sequences at the same U-rich in vivo recognized areas (Caffarelli et al., 1994).
Characterization of XendoU Cleavage
The analysis of the ion dependence of cleavage was carried out by incubating 32P-labelled U16 containing precursor with ONE or with purified XendoU in the presence of different cations as shown in FIG. 2. In both cases Cd++, Zn++, Ni++, Co++ and Pb++ do not activate cleavage; whereas Mn++, and to a minor extent Mg++, produce the appearance of the specific cleavage products. These results indicate a Mn++ ion requirement for XendoU full activity.
The substrate selectivity of XendoU was further addressed by incubating the purified enzyme with synthetic oligoribonucleotide (P1, SEQ ID NO: 3), containing the distal XendoU cleavage site (site d, FIG. 1A), localised upstream from U16, and with mutated derivatives thereof (P2, SEQ ID NO: 4 and P3, SEQ ID NO: 5). The obtained results, shown in FIG. 3A, indicate that XendoU displays the same selectivity observed in vivo and that the minimal consensus cleavage site is an uracyl dimer.
The incubation of the enzyme with double stranded oligoribonucleotides, of 21 nucleotides, containing U-rich sequences demonstrated that only single stranded RNAs are recognized by XendoU.
The chemistry of XendoU cleavage was then assessed by determining the chemical nature of the ends of the cleaved products; To this aim we analysed the ends of 32P-labelled I-1a and I-1b molecules produced with ONE or with the purified XendoU: these molecules were gel purified and treated with alkaline phosphatase, HCl, or both. FIG. 3B shows that a slight decrease in migration, due to the loss of a negative charge, is obtained when the alkaline phosphatase treatment follows the HCl treatment (lanes 3). This result is obtained both with ONE (lanes ONE) and purified XendoU (lanes XendoU) and indicates that the 3′ end of the molecules bears a phosphate group which is present in a 2′-3′ cyclic form (Lund and Dahiberg, 1992; Forster et al., 1990). In fact, only after the acidic treatment the phosphate group can be removed by phosphatase resulting in a slight electrophoresis delay. This effect is observed both for the I-1a and I-1b molecules obtained with unfractionated oocyte nuclear extract and with XendoU. As previously reported (Caffarelli et al., 1996), the products of primary cleavage such as I-1 molecules, are in vivo unstable being rapidly degraded, after cleavage. Nevertheless, after very short incubation times, little amounts of I-1b molecules can be purified and subjected to the same treatment as described above. FIG. 3B (lanes in vivo) indicates that also in this case a slight delay in migration is obtained (lane 3), demonstrating that the products of the in vivo reaction display 2′-3′ cyclic phosphates as well.
Isolation of cDNA for XendoU
After purification, protein samples from SDS-PAGE were reduced, alkylated and digested with trypsin as reported in the experimental section. The resulting peptide mixture was resolved by R-HPLC and selected peptide fractions were submitted to automated Edman degradation. The three sequence portions determined are reported in FIG. 4 (indicated as 1, 2 and 3). From these amino acid sequences, degenerated oligonucleotides were derived and employed in different combinations and different orientation in PCR amplification reactions on cDNA from polyA+ RNA extracted from X. laevis oocytes. Only the reaction performed with sequence 1 (forward) and sequence 3 (reverse) resulted in an amplification product (500 bp). Sequencing of this product indicated the presence of an Open Reading Frame containing peptide 2. This cDNA probe was then utilised for the screening of a X. laevis stage 28 embryo cDNA library, allowing the isolation of a full-length cDNA (SEQ ID NO: 1). The amino acid sequence determined was confirmed by MALDI-MS spectra of the tryptic peptides. In fact, signals observed at m/z 565.29, 814.45, 1004.48, 10025.54, 1132.59, 1190.60, 1490.78, 1504.80, 1520.70, 1729.91, 1758.82, 1988.08, 2000.00, 2014.01, 2076.99, 2162.98, 2234.14, 2238.05, 2394.15, 2432.26, 3058.51 and 3370.66 were ascribed to peptides 196-200, 126-132, 117-124, 6-14, 117-125, 41-52, 114-125, 260-271, 15-26, 137-149, 53-67, 256-271, 53-69, 275-292, 204-220, 150-169, 133-149, 171-188, 170-188, 117-136, 6-31 and Ac4-31. This result allowed to cover 65% of the entire sequence, explaining the reluctance of a blotted protein sample to Edman degradation.
Cloning and Expression of XendoU cDNA
XendoU ORF, 876 bp, was cloned into Blue Script vector and the protein was produced by in vitro transcription and translation using reticulocyte lysate. The translational product was analysed on SDS-PAGE revealing a protein of 37 kDa molecular mass (FIG. 5 A). In order to assess the nature of the 37 kDa protein, enzymatic activity was assayed by incubating the 32P-labelled RNA substrate in reticulocyte lysate expressing XendoU ORF. The activity assay was carried out in parallel with the unfractionated extract: FIG. 5B shows that the cleavage products generated by the translated 37 kDa protein (lane ret-XendoU/+Mn) exactly match those obtained with the extract (lanes ONE). Furthermore, the lack of cleavage when Mn++ ions are not added to the reaction mixture (lane ret-XendoU/−Mn) confirms the specific ion requirement for XendoU and suggests that the binding to the cofactor is reversible. As negative control the activity assay was carried out by incubating RNA substrate in reticulocyte lysate as such in the presence of Mn++ ions (lane ret/+Mn).
XendoU also Participates to U86 snoRNA Biosynthesis
The authors previously identified a snoRNA, named U86, encoded by an intron of Nop56 gene of X. laevis. It was also shown that U86 has homologs both in human, where it displays the same genomic organization, and in yeast where it is embedded in the ORF of Rib1 gene (Filippini et al., 2001). As U16 snoRNA, also U86 is contained in a very poorly spliceable intron and its biosynthesis appears to be alternative to that of the co-transcribed mRNA. The injection of 32P-labelled U86-containing precursor into X. laevis oocytes generates the truncated products I-2 and I-3 and their 5′ and 3′ complementary molecules, 1-1 and 1-4, by means of upstream and downstream cleavages from U86 coding region (FIG. 6A, lanes in vivo).
Processing of U86-containing precursor with purified XendoU (FIG. 6A, lanes XendoU) or with the reticulocyte lysate expressing XendoU ORF (FIG. 6C, lane ret-XendoU/+Mn) demonstrates that the enzyme is responsible for the occurring cleavage downstream from U86 coding region. The effector of the cleavage upstream from U86, that produces I-2 and I-1 molecules, is not yet known and it is lost in oocyte nuclear extracts (FIG. 6A, lanes ONE). The XendoU cleavage sites, downstream from U86, were determined by primer extension on 1-4 molecules and correspond to two U-rich sequences (FIG. 6B).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Allmang, C., KufEL, J., Chanfreau, G., Mitchell, P., Petfaiski E. and Tollervey, D. (1999) Functions of the exosome m rRNA, snoRNA and snRNA synthesis. EMBO J. 18, 5399-5410.
Ambros. V. (2001) Dicing up RNAs. Science 293, 811-813
Bachellerie, J. P., Cavaille, J. and Qu, L. H. (2000) Nucleotide modifications of eukaryotic rRNAs: the worid of small nucleolar RNA guides revisited. The Ribosome: structure, function, antibiotics, and cellular interactions. (2000 ASM Press, Washington, D.C.) pp. 191-203.
Bachmann, M., Messer, R., Trautmann, F. and Muller, W. E. G. (1984) 12S small nuclear ribonucleoprotein-associated acidic and pyrimidine-specific endoribonuclease from calf thymus and L5178y cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 783, 89-99.
Bernstein, E., Caudy, A. A., Hammond, S. M. and Hannon, G. J. (2001) Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the intiation step of RNA interference. Nature 409, 363-366.
Bujnicki, J. M., and Rychlewski, L. (2000) Prediction of a common fold for all four subunits of the yeast tRNA splicing endonuclease: implications for the evolution of the EndA/Sen family. FEBS Lett. 486, 328-9.
Caffarelli, E., Losito, M., Giorgi, C., Fatica, A., and Bozzoni, I; (1998) in vivo identification of nuclear factors interacting with the conserved elements of box C/D small nucleolar RNAs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 1023-1028.
Caffarelli, E., Arese, M., Santoro, B., Fragapane, P., and Bozzoni, I. (1994) Invitro study of processing of the intron-encoded U16 small nucleolar RNA in Xenopus laevis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 2966-2974
Caffarelli, E., Fatica, A., Prislei, S., De Gregorio, E., Fragapane, P., and Bozzoni, I. (1996) Processing of the intron-encoded U16 and U18 snoRNAs: the conserved c and D boxes control both the processing reactions and the stability of the mature snoRNA. EMBO J. 5, 1121-1131.
Castano, J. G., Tobian, J. A., and Zasloff, M. (1985) Purification and characterization of an endonuclease from Xenopus laevis ovaries which accurately processes the 3′ terminus of human pre-tRNA-Met(i) (3′ pre-tRNase). J. Biol. Chem. 260, 9002-9008
Chanfreau. G., Elela, S. A., Ares, M. Jr., and Guthrie, C. (1997) Alternative 3′-end processing of U5 snRNA by RNase III. Genes Dev. 11, 2741-2751
Chanfreau, G., Legrain, P., and Jacquier, A. (1998) Yeast RNase III as a key processing enzyme in small nucleolar RNAs metabolism. J. Mol. Biol. 284, 975-88.
Cirino, N. M., Cameron, C. E., Smith, J. S., Rausch, J. W., Roth, M. J., Benkovic, S. J. and Le Grice, S. F. (1995) Divalent cation modulation of the ribonuclease functions of human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase. Biochemistry 34, 9936-9943.
Court, D. (1993) Rnase III: a double-strand processing enzyme. In: Brawerman, G. and Belasco, J, eds Control of mRNA stability. (New York, Academic, Press), pp. 70-116.
Dange, V., Van Atta, R. B. and Hecht, S. M. (1990) A Mn2(+)-dependent ribozyme. Science 248, 585-588.
Deutscher, M. P. (1985) E. coli RNAses: making sense of alphabet soup. Cell 40, 731-732.
Deutscher, M. P. (1993) Ribonuclease multiplicity, diversity, and complexity, J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13011-13014
Eder, P. S. and Walder, J. A. (1991) Ribonuclease H from K562 human erythroleukemia cells. Purification, characterization, and substrate specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 6472-6479,
Elela, S. A., Igel, H., and Ares. M. Jr. (1996) Rnase III cleaves eukaryotic preribosomal RNA at a U3 snoRNP-dependent site. Cell, 85, 115-124.
Filippini, D., Renzi, F., Bozzoni, I., and Caffarelli. E. (2001) U86, a novel snoRNA with an unprecedented gene organisation in yeast. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 288, 16-21
Forster, A. C., Davies, C., Hutchins, C. J. and Symons R. H. (1990) Characterization of self-cleavage of viroid and virusoid RNAs. Methods Enzymol. 181, 583-607
Fragapane, P., Prislei, S., Michienzi, A., Caffarelli, E. and Bozzoni I. (1993) A novel small nucleolar RNA (U16) is encoded inside a ribosomal protein intron and originates by processing of the pre-mRNA. EMBO J. 12, 2921-2928.
Freemont, P. S., Friedman, J. M., Beese, L. S., Sanderson M. R. and Steitz, T. A. (1988) Cocrystal structure of an editing complex of Klenow fragment with DNA Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 8924-8928.
Gandini-Attardi, D., Margarit, I. and Tocchini-Valentini, G. P. (1985) Structural alteration in mutant precursors of the yeast tRNA3Leu gene which behave as detective substrates for a highly purified splicing endoribonuclease. EMBO J. 4, 3289-3297.
Gandini-Attardi, D., Baldi, I. M., Mattoccia, E., and Tocchini-Valentini G. P. (1990) Transfer RNA splicing endonuclease from Xenopus laevis. Methods Enzymol. 181, 510-517.
Giorgi, C., Fatica, A., Nagel, R., and Bozzoni, I. (2001) Release of U18 snoRNA from its host intron requires interaction of Nop1p with the Rnt1p endonuclease. EMBO J. 20, 6856-65.
Hirose, T., and Steitz J. A. (2001) Position within the host intron is critical for efficient processing of box C/D snoRNAs in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12914-12919.
Kazakov, S. and Altman, S. (1992) A trinucleotide can promote metal ion-dependent specific cleavage of RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 7939-7943.
Kufel, J., Dichtl, B., and Tollervey, D. (1999) Yeast Rntip is required for cleavage of the pre-ribosomal RNA in the 3′ ETS but not the 5′ ETS. RNA 5, 909-917
Lygerou. Z., Allmang, C., Tollervey, D., and Seraphin, B. (1996) Accurate processing of a eukaryotic precursor ribosomal RNA by ribonuclease MRP in vitro. Science 272, 268-270
Lund, E. and Dahlberg J. E. (1992) Cyclic 2′,3′-phosphates and nontemplated nucleotides at the 3′end of spliceosomal U6 small nuclear RNA's. Science 255, 327-330
Maxwell, E. S. and Fournier, M. J. (1995) The small nucleolar RNAs. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 897-934
McDowall, K. J., Kaberdin, V. R., Wu, S. W., Cohen, S. N. and Lin-Chao, S. (1995) Site specific RNase E cleavage of oligonucleotides and inhibition by stem-loops. Nature 374, 287-290
Nashimoto, M., (1995) Conversion of mammalian tRNA 3′ proessing endoribonuclease to four-base-recognising RNA cutters. Nucl. Acids Res. 23, 3642-3647
Nicholson, A. W. (1997) in Ribonucleases: structures and functions, eds. D'Alessio, G. and Riordan, J. F. (Academic New York), pp. 1-49
Pan, T., Long, D. M. and Uhlenbeck. O. C. (1993) The RNA World, ed. R. F. Gesteland and J. F. Atkins, CSHL Press, 271-302.
Peebies, C. L., Gegenheimer, P., and Abelson, J. (1983) Precise excision of intervening sequences from precursor tRNAs by a membrane-associated yeast endonuclease. Cell 32, 525-536.
Prislei, S., Sperandio, S., Fragapane, P., Caffarelli, E., Presutti, C. and Bozzoni, I. (1992) The mechanisms controlling ribosomal protein L1 pre-mRNA splicing are maintained in evolution and rely on conserved intron sequences. Nucl. Acids Res. 17, 4473-4479
Prislei, S., Fatica, A., De Gregorio, E., Arese, M., Fragapane, P., Caffarelli, E., Presutti, C. and Bozzoni, I. (1995) Self-cleaving motifs are found in dose proximity to the sites utilised for U16 snoRNA processing. Gene 163, 221-226.
Rauhut, R., Green, P. R., and Abelson, J. (1990). Yeast tRNA-splicing endonuclease is a heterotrimeric enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 18180-18184.
Schoenberg, D. R., and Chemokaiskaya, E. (1997) Ribonucleases involved in eukaryotic mRNA turnover, p. 217-240. In J. Harford and D. R. Morris (ed.), mRNA metabolism and post-transcriptional gene regulation. Wiley, New York; N.Y.
Steitz, J. A. and Steitz, T. A. (1993) A general two-metal-ion mechanism for catalytic RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 6498-6502.
Trotta, C. R., Miao, F., Am, E. A., Stevens, S. W., Ho, C. K., Rauhut, R., and Abelson, J. N. (1997) The yeast tRNA splicing endonuclease: a tetrameric enzyme with two active site subunits homologous to the archaeal tRNA endonucleases. Cell 89, 849-58
Zamore P. D. (2001) Thirty-three years later, a glimpse at the ribonuclease III active site. Molecular Celi 8, 1158-1160
Watkins, N. J., Segault, V., Charpentier, B., Nottrott, S., Fabrizio, P., Bachi, A., Wilm, M., Rosbash, M., Branlant, C., and Luhrmann, R. (2000) A common core RNP structure shared between the small nucleolar box CID RNPs and the spliceosomal U4 snRNP. Cell 103, 457-466.

## Claims

1. An isolated nucleic acid comprising SEQ ID No 1.

2. A recombinant vector able to express the nucleic acid according to claim 1 in prokaryotes.

3. A recombinant vector able to express the nucleic acid according to claim 1 in eukaryotes.

4. An isolated nucleic acid sequence consisting of SEQ ID No 1.