alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5687 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5687

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Red 185.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

 Mr. Hultgren introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Red 185.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT RED 185.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.26 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Pigment Red 185) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.5

STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION    
2004 PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN

The
purpose of the Storage Technology Corporation Performance-Based Incentive Plan is to provide certain employees of the Company and its affiliates with incentive compensation based upon the level of
achievement to financial, business and other performance criteria.

As
used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:

p.1

---

income,
operating income or net operating income, operating profit or net operating profit, operating margin, return on operating revenue, market share, overhead or other expense reduction, credit
rating, strategic plan development and implementation, succession plan development and implementation, customer satisfaction indicators, and/or employee metrics.

Persons
employed by the Company or any of its Affiliates during the Performance Period and in active service are eligible to be Participants under the Plan for such Performance Period (whether or not
so employed or living at the date a Bonus is paid) and may be considered by the Committee for a Bonus. An individual is not rendered ineligible to be a Participant by reason of being a member of the
Board.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Committee shall have sole discretion to designate or approve the Participants for any given Performance Period.

Prior
to the Predetermination Date, the Committee shall designate or approve (a) the positions or employees who will be Participants for a Performance Period, (b) the minimum and maximum
Bonuses and the Target Bonuses for the position or employee, (c) the applicable Performance Measures and combination of Performance Measures and percentages allocated to applicable Performance
Measures, and (d) the Performance Period. All Performance Measures pertaining to a Covered Officer shall be of such a nature that an objective third party having knowledge of all the relevant
facts could determine whether performance results with respect to such Performance Measures have been achieved. With respect to the Covered Officers, the determination of the

p.2

---

minimum
and maximum Bonuses and the Target Bonus will include a peer/performance factor to be determined by the Committee at this same time.

p.3

---

p.4

---

Participants.
It is expressly agreed and understood that employment is terminable at the will of either party and, if such Participant is a party to an employment contract with the Company or one of
its Affiliates, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Participant's employment contract.

p.5

---

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Plan to become effective as of the date it is approved by the Stockholders of the Company.

p.6

---
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

 
| **Entity (1)**                               | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|---------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|
| BHR   Partners, LLC                               |       | Delaware                                    |
| BHR, Inc.   (2)                              |       | Delaware                                    |
| BHR   BT, Inc.                               |       | Delaware                                    |
| BHR   Business Trust (2)                          |       | Maryland                                    |
| Behringer   Harvard Operating Partnership I LP(3) |       | Texas                                       |

 

----

(1) Does not include subsidiaries of Behringer Harvard Operating Partnership I LP, which holds our investment assets.

 

(2) BHR BT, Inc. owns 100% of the interests of BHR Business Trust.

 

(3) As of December 31, 2010, BHR, Inc. was the sole general partner and owner of 17 general partnership units in Behringer Harvard Operating Partnership I LP, our operating partnership.  As of December 31, 2010, BHR Business Trust was a limited partner and owner of approximately 259.9 million partnership units in Behringer Harvard Operating Partnership I LP.  As of December 31, 2010, BHR Partners, LLC was a limited partner and owner of approximately 35.4 million partnership units in Behringer Harvard Operating Partnership I LP.  Noncontrolling interest not owned by us consists of 432,586 partnership units in Behringer Harvard Operating Partnership I LP.

 

----
#### BROADHEAD v. STATE.

No. 26011.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1952.

'No attorney on appeal for appellant,

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*195BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale with allegations of former convictions for enhancing the penalty. The jury assessed a fine of $1,500.

The record shows that objection was duly made to the complaint, in' so far as it alleged former convictions, because they were not alleged as facts by the sheriff, who signed the complaint, but consisted of “presentations” made by the county attorney in the same instrument. To correct this error the court permitted the county attorney to amend the affidavit of the sheriff, inserting the sheriff’s name instead of his own. This was done after the affidavit had been filed and before an announcement by the defendant in the case.

We have -so frequently held that affidavits cannot be amended after being filed that it is hardly necessary to cite the cases. The reason is perfectly apparent and especially in the case now before us, because one person cannot change another’s affidavit. The attempt to amend is fatal and it is accordingly ordered that the judgment rendered thereon be reversed and the prosecution upon the complaint be dismissed, without prejudice to the right of the state to file a new complaint.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of the Census 

          - [Docket Number 000913261-0261-01]

# AGENCY: 

Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION: 

Notice of publication program change. 

# SUMMARY: 

The Bureau of the Census (Census Bureau) will cease printed publication of the “Monthly Product Announcement” (MPA) with the December 2000 edition. The publication's information and additional data will be available at <www.census.gov> and as a free Internet subscription. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE: 

December 31, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Les Solomon, Marketing Services Office, Customer Services Center, Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233, telephone:  301-457-1224. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The MPA lists all Census Bureau publications and data files for a 30-day period. It includes product ordering information and order forms. The MPA does not describe every data product, but usually does discuss one or two new ones in each issue. 

The Census Bureau has decided to provide product information to the customer on a more timely basis. The new format will give the customer product information daily and allow the customer to purchase products immediately. We believe that changing to Internet access will not significantly affect the MPA's users. We will, however, address the needs of customers adversely affected by this change. Customers may request a paper copy that lists the Census Bureau's monthly releases by contacting the Customer Services Center at 301-457-4100. 

Dated:  October 11, 2000. 

Kenneth Prewitt, 

Director, Bureau of the Census. 

[FR Doc. 00-26641 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-01-P
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

MELODY JOY CANTU and

DR. RODRIGO CANTU, 

Plaintiffs

V.

DR. SANDRA GUERRA and

DIGITAL FORENSICS 

CORPORATION, LLC

Defendants

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO 5:20-CV-00746-JKP (HJB)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MEMORANDUM IN 

SUPPORT TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY

On this date came on to be considered Plaintiffs’ Notice of Motion and Memorandum in 

Support to Compel Defendants’ Discovery [Doc. 78] (the “Motion”). Upon due consideration of 

the Motion and Defendant, Dr. Sandra Guerra’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Notice of Motion and 

Memorandum in Support to Compel Defendants’ Discovery [Doc. ___ ], the Court finds that the 

Motion should be DENIED in its entirety. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Notice of Motion and Memorandum in 

Support to Compel Defendants’ Discovery is DENIED in all respects. 

It is so ORDERED.

Dated: ____________________ __________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 80-1 Filed 06/16/22 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99b


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned, as chief financial officer of The L.S. Starrett
Company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's
knowledge:

1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer


Dated: May 9, 2003

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906
HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE L.S.STARRETT COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY
THE L.S.STARRETT COMPANY AND FURNISHED THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

ex99bruwcertMAR03.doc	-2-
SCWC-30059

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

CLARENCE STONE, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. 30059; CASE NOS. 2DTA-08-00722; 2DTA-08-01628; 

2DTC-08-011610; 2DTC-09-009261)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and

Circuit Judge Nakasone, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the Motion for Reconsideration

(motion) filed on March 10, 2014 by Petitioner/DefendantAppellant Clarence Stone, and the records and files herein, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 27, 2014.

Hayden Aluli

for petitioner

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-30059

27-MAR-2014

12:40 PM
----

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned officer of StockerYale, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that   the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached, as filed   with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the   requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as   amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is   provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item   601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and   the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall   not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the   liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any   filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company   specifically incorporates it by reference.

| Date: August 13, 2003Name:/s/**                                                                                                 Francis J. O'Brien                        Francis  J. O'Brien                                                         Title:Chief                                                                                                 Financial                                                                                                 Officer                                                                                                 andTreasurer 
 Exhibit 32.2  /  STKR    2003 Form 10-Q |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                             5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1000
       
<S>                                                 <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            82125
<SECURITIES>                                       2003
<RECEIVABLES>                                    238671
<ALLOWANCES>                                       2798
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 481762
<PP&E>                                           284732
<DEPRECIATION>                                   156147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   787408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            375320
<BONDS>                                           23866
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          17731
<OTHER-SE>                                       301446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     787408
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 349525
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    323670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    9205<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                       3637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                5568
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                       5568
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.43
<FN>
<F1>Includes General and Administrative  Expenses of (17053) and interest income
of 830 not reflected on this tag list.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
              CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, David Walters, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Monarch Staffing,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.  The small business issuers other certifying officer and I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the
audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 10, 2007        /s/ David Walters
                              ---------------------------------------
                                  David Walters
                                  Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2668 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2668

  To delay the application of the individual health insurance mandate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2013

    Mr. Young of Indiana (for himself, Mr. Griffin of Arkansas, Mr. 
   Boustany, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mrs. Black, Mr. Camp, Mr. Kelly of 
 Pennsylvania, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Reichert, Mr. 
Schock, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Renacci, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Reed, Mr. Tiberi, 
Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. Paulsen, Mr. Roskam, Ms. Jenkins, Mr. Smith 
  of Nebraska, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. Price of Georgia, and Mrs. Blackburn) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To delay the application of the individual health insurance mandate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness for American Families 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DELAY IN APPLICATION OF INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE MANDATE.

    (a) In General.--Section 5000A(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2014''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 5000A(c)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986 is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``2014'' in clause (i) and 
                inserting ``2015'', and
                    (B) by striking ``2015'' in clauses (ii) and (iii) 
                and inserting ``2016''.
            (2) Section 5000A(c)(3)(B) of such Code is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``2014'' and inserting ``2015'', 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``2015'' (prior to amendment by 
                subparagraph (A)) and inserting ``2016''.
            (3) Section 5000A(c)(3)(D) of such Code is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``2016'' and inserting ``2017'', 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2016''.
            (4) Section 5000A(e)(1)(D) of such Code is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``2014'' and inserting ``2015'', 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2014''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in section 1501 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act.
                                 <all>
```