alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2650 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2650

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To allow the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa in the State of 
              Minnesota to lease or transfer certain land.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL OF CERTAIN LAND TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law 
(including regulations), and without further approval, ratification, or 
authorization by the United States, the Fond du Lac Band of Lake 
Superior Chippewa in the State of Minnesota (referred to in this Act as 
the ``Band'') may lease, sell, convey, warrant, or otherwise transfer 
all or any portion of the interest of the Band in any real property 
that is not held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the 
Band.
    (b) No Effect on Trust Land.--Nothing in this Act--
            (1) authorizes the Band to lease, sell, convey, warrant, or 
        otherwise transfer all or any portion of any interest in any 
        real property that is held in trust by the United States for 
        the benefit of the Band; or
            (2) affects any Federal law (including regulations) 
        relating to leasing, selling, conveying, warranting, or 
        otherwise transferring any interest in the real property 
        described in paragraph (1).

            Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2650

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To allow the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa in the State of 
              Minnesota to lease or transfer certain land.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5503 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5503

 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1,3-Propanediaminium, N-[3-
       [[[dimethyl[3-[(2-methyl-1-oxo-2-propenyl)amino] propyl] 
   ammonio]acetyl]amino]propyl]-2-hydroxy-N,N,N',N',N'-pentamethyl-, 
                trichloride, polymer with 2-propenamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mrs. Schmidt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1,3-Propanediaminium, N-[3-
       [[[dimethyl[3-[(2-methyl-1-oxo-2-propenyl)amino] propyl] 
   ammonio]acetyl]amino]propyl]-2-hydroxy-N,N,N',N',N'-pentamethyl-, 
                trichloride, polymer with 2-propenamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,3-PROPANEDIAMINIUM, N-[3-[[[DIMETHYL[3-[(2-METHYL-1-OXO-2-
              PROPENYL)AMINO]-PROPYL]AMMONIO]ACETYL]AMINO]PROPYL]-2-
              HYDROXY-N,N,N',N',N'-PENTAMETHYL-, TRICHLORIDE, POLYMER 
              WITH 2-PROPENAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1,3-Propanediamini  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          um, N-[3-                                                         12/31/2015
                          [[[dimethyl[3-[(2-
                          methyl-1-oxo-2-
                          propenyl)amino]pr
                          opyl]-
                          ammonio]acetyl]am
                          ino]propyl]-2-
                          hydroxy-
                          N,N,N',N',N'-
                          pentamethyl-,
                          trichloride,
                          polymer with 2-
                          propenamide (CAS
                          No. 916155-61-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3906.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.9

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Paramount Energy Trust (the Trust) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cameron R. Sebastian, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Paramount Energy Operating Corp., who performs the same function for the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Cameron R. Sebastian

Cameron R. Sebastian
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Paramount Energy Operating Corp.

March 11, 2008
Case 1:20-cv-00655-LY   Document 332   Filed 09/21/22   Page 1 of 6

Case 1:20-cv-00655-LY   Document 332   Filed 09/21/22   Page 2 of 6

Case 1:20-cv-00655-LY   Document 332   Filed 09/21/22   Page 3 of 6

Case 1:20-cv-00655-LY   Document 332   Filed 09/21/22   Page 4 of 6

Case 1:20-cv-00655-LY   Document 332   Filed 09/21/22   Page 5 of 6

Case 1:20-cv-00655-LY   Document 332   Filed 09/21/22   Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of StockerYale, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark
W. Blodgett, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark W. Blodgett                 
|Mark W. Blodgett                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|November 14, 2008                    



33
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00552

- CR

Lisa D. Wall

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 4

o f Denton County (CR

- 2012

- 01008

-

D )

May 7 , 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECON D DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

____________________ Justice Sue Walker
#### In the Matter of Huey B. Wright, Petitioner, v Howard Relin, as Monroe County District Attorney, et al., Respondents.

Motion to prevent Supreme Court Justice from hearing appellant’s CPLR article 78 proceeding denied. Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Docket No: Faa-2015-0075 Dir ID: 2014-NM-202-AD
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

BRYNNE SOUKUP,

 Plaintiff,

v.

FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. AND 

FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS, LLC,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 1:20-CV-648-RP

ORDER

ON THIS DAY came to be considered Defendant Frontier Airlines, Inc.’s Motion to 

Dismiss and Brief in Support. Having considered the motion, response, record of the case, and 

relevant law, the Court finds that the motion is not well-taken and should be DENIED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Compel is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED THIS _____ DAY OF _________________, 2020. 

________________________________

PRESIDING JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 12-3 Filed 08/18/20 Page 1 of 1
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 MICHAEL BURNS,

3 Worker-Appellant,

4 v. NO. 35,496

5 PROCLEAN OF ARIZONA and

6 TRAVELERS INSURANCE,

7 Employer/Insurer-Appellees.

8 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION

9 Leonard J. Padilla, Workers’ Compensation Judge

10 Rod Dunn

11 Rio Rancho, NM 

12 for Appellant

13 Sebastian A. Dunlap

14 Albuquerque, NM 

15 for Appellees

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 VIGIL, Judge.

18 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

19 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
2

1 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

2 {2} AFFIRMED.

3 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 _______________________________

5 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge

6 WE CONCUR:

7 ___________________________

8 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

9 ___________________________

10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

Teri Albright, Milton D Shaw, Max Fowler,

Paula Fowler, Trinity Edwards Springs

Protection Association

vs.

Permian Highway Pipeline LLC, Kinder Morgan

Texas Pipeline LLC

§

§

§

§

§

NO: AU:20-CV-00651-RP

ORDER

 The Court sets and directs the parties, or counsel acting on their behalf, to appear by phone

for an initial pretrial conference on September 28, 2020 at 09:20 AM . Counsel for Plaintiff shall

be responsible for coordinating the call and providing dial-in information at least 24 hours prior to

the hearing to opposing counsel and to the Courtroom Deputy at julie_golden@txwd.uscourts.gov.

The parties should be prepared to discuss potential trial settings as the Court intends to set a trial

date in this action at the initial pretrial conference.

Until the Court enters a scheduling order in this case and absent additional instruction from

the Court, the parties shall abide by all agreed deadlines set out in their proposed scheduling order

 SIGNED on 17th day of September, 2020.

______________________________

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00651-RP Document 18 Filed 09/17/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-00651-RP Document 18 Filed 09/17/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned officers of Standard  Microsystems  Corporation (the Company),  does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2003 of the
Company fully  complies,  in all material  respects,  with the  requirements  of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and  information
contained  in the Form 10-Q  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: January 13, 2004                     By: /s/ Steven J. Bilodeau
                                            ---------------------------
                                                    (signature)

                                            Steven J. Bilodeau
                                            Chairman of the Board, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                            By: /s/ Andrew M. Caggia
                                            ---------------------------
                                                    (signature)

                                            Andrew M. Caggia
                                            Senior Vice President - Finance
                                            and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       8,791,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,918,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                   199,756
<INVENTORY>                                 14,552,509
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,379,259
<PP&E>                                       4,837,785
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,741,622
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,460,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,851,045
<BONDS>                                     10,984,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,259
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,031,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,460,361
<SALES>                                      8,587,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,714,671
<CGS>                                        4,771,112
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,771,112
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,202,942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                32,041
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             204,606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                740,617
<INCOME-TAX>                                   273,060
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            467,557
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   467,557
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7189

DENNIS BAYSDEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA; MACK JARVIS, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-574-3) Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Baysden, Appellant Pro Se. Kendrick C. Fentress, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dennis Baysden seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting a magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Respondents’ motion for summary judgment and deny relief on Baysden’s petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and a subsequent order denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error in the court’s orders. Accordingly, we deny acertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Baysden v. Attorney General of North Carolina , No. CA-97-574-3 (M.D.N.C. July 1, 1998; Dec. 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
              -----------------------------------------------------

                   CHASE CREDIT CARD OWNER TRUST SERIES 2002-5

              -----------------------------------------------------



         The undersigned, an Authorized Officer of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, as Administrator pursuant to the Indenture for the Chase
Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2002-5 does hereby certify that:

                  1.       The undersigned is an Authorized Officer pursuant to
                  the Indenture to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
                  Indenture Trustee.

                  2.       This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.9
                  of the Indenture.

                  3.       A review of the activities of the Issuer during the
                  period from the closing date until December 31, 2003, and of
                  performance under this Indenture has been made under the
                  supervision of the undersigned.

                  4.       To the best of the undersigned knowledge, based on
                  such review, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and
                  covenants in all material respects under this Indenture
                  throughout the period from the closing date until December 31,
                  2003. No default in the compliance of any such condition or
                  covenant has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in
                  paragraph 5 below.

                  5.       The following is a description of each default in the
                  performance of the Issuer's obligations under the provisions
                  of the Indenture known to the undersigned to have been made
                  during such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature
                  of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Issuer, if
                  any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status
                  of each such default: NONE.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 30th day of March, 2004.

                                      By: CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                                          National Association, as Administrator




                                      By: /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
                                          --------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Patricia M. Garvey
                                      Title: Vice President
# InventoryExpertService A divisior oftheAmerican Chemical Society 

### Phone:800-631-1884,614-447-3870 Fax: 

### 614-447-3747 E-mail:answers@cas.org Web:www.cas.org/products/client/


### INVENTORY.EXPERT SERVICE REPORT IES-ORDER NUMBER: 135516-1 REGISTRY NUMBER:

CASPlease print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN, 

# 0 If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order; Please make the same correction(s) to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA.

2540 Olentangy River Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus, Ohio 43210-0334 USA
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6405

TRAVIS MANDELL KEMP, a/k/a Travis Kemp,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

OFFICER JOHNSON, GCDC; PHILLIP ANDERSON, Greenwood County 

Detention Center; SHARON MIDDLETON, Cpt GCDC; LUKE LARK, Lt 

GCDC; OFFICER BROOKS, GCDC,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(1:09-cv-03195-TLW)

Submitted: July 17, 2012 Decided: August 6, 2012

Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Travis Mandell Kemp, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, 

II, Joel Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South 

Carolina; Kristy Grafton Goldberg, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Travis Mandell Kemp appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kemp v. 

Johnson, No. 1:09-cv-03195-TLW (D.S.C. Feb. 2, 2012). We deny 

Kemp’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T J UNE 4, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 8

- 1 7 1 6 3 N o n
- A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 0

- 0 0 0 0 4

- C R

- 0 0 2

- W L S

- 7

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

T A J R I C K C O N A W A Y ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f G e o r g i a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( J u n e 4 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e T J O F L A T , B L A C K a n d B A R K E T T , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :

D e m e t r i a N i c o l e W i l l i a m s , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r T a j r i c k C o n a w a y , h a s f

i l e da m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w o n a p p e a l s u p p o r t e d b y a b r i e f p r e p a r e d p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s

v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r
i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e

r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e

e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s
G R A N T E D , a n d t h e d e n i a l s o f C o n a w a y ’ s m o t i o n t o r e d u c e h i s s e n t e n c e p u r s u a n t

t o 1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) a n d h i s m o t i o n s f o r r e c o n s i d e r a t i o n a r e A F F I R M E D

.

2