alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                             5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1000

<S>                                                 <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            45017
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    273083
<ALLOWANCES>                                       5247
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 403926
<PP&E>                                           367974
<DEPRECIATION>                                   148244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   839324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            539511
<BONDS>                                           21736
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          17731
<OTHER-SE>                                       213768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     839324
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 254646
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    307283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (70,650)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (10000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (60650)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     1956
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (58694)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (4.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.50)


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cytation Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Fisher, Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard
FisherRichard Fisher
Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2005

---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cytation Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin J. High, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Kevin J.
High                              
Kevin J. High
President and Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2005
#### Linda Talley, Respondent, v Montefiore Hospital, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered July 6, 1989, which conditionally granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s action based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with a prior order dated November 3, 1988, is unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed on default for plaintiff’s failure to serve the complaint after demand. Subsequently, the court vacated the default on condition that plaintiff pay costs of the motion and serve the complaint within 30 days of order. It is disputed whether the complaint was then timely served. Alleging that it had not received the complaint until approximately 60 days after the date of the conditional order, defendant then moved to dismiss the action. The IAS court granted the motion conditionally, allowing plaintiff one more opportunity to serve the complaint.

This court adheres to liberally excusing nonprejudical defaults *(Shure v Village of Westhampton Beach,*121 AD2d 887). Even if we were to find that plaintiff failed to comply with the first conditional order, under the circumstances presented, plaintiff has demonstrated both a reasonable excuse and a meritorious defense, such that there was no abuse of discretion in permitting plaintiff a further opportunity to serve the defendant. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 10.21


 


Explanatory Note: This document has been translated
from the Chinese-language original for reference purposes only. While this English translation is believed to be generally accurate, it
is subject to, and qualified by, in its entirety, the Chinese-language original. Such Chinese-language original shall be the controlling
document for all purposes.


  


Purchase Advance Payment Contract


 


Party A (payer): Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party B (Payee): Wenhao Zhang


 


Party B is Party A’s raw material supplier. In order to reduce
operating costs and enhance the partnership between the two parties, Party A agrees to prepay certain prices for the purchase of corresponding
raw materials for Party B’s obligation to provide Party A with Camellia seeds. After full negotiation by both parties, the following
contracts have been concluded:


 


1. Purpose of advance payment: Party B can only use the advance payment
paid by Party A to purchase camellia seed raw materials, and shall not use it for other purposes.


 


2. Prepaid amount: RMB 2,000,000


 


3. As Party B’s business scope also involves Camellia seed oil,
Party A may also provide Party B with Camellia seed oil of the same value as the advance payment to offset the advance payment. The price
of Camellia seed oil shall be in accordance with Party A’s regulations.


 


4. Repayment method: Party B will deduct the advance payment in the
form of Camellia seeds or equivalent currency to Party A. The repayment period shall not exceed twelve months per year, and special circumstances
shall be negotiated separately.


 


5. Party B promises to provide Party A with Camellia Seeds at a price
that is 2% lower than the actual price of Camellia Seeds on the actual delivery date. After the prepayment is deducted, the settlement
will be based on the actual market price.


 


6. If Party B fails to use the advance payment as required by the agreement,
Party A has the right to recover the advance payment and impose a penalty interest of three thousandths per day for the breached part.


 


7. For matters not covered, the two parties can negotiate and conclude
a supplementary contract. The supplementary contract has the same legal effect as this contract. Any party who fails to negotiate can
bring a lawsuit to the people's court in China.


 


8. This contract is valid for one year, and it will automatically terminate
when it expires.


 


9. This contract has two copies, with each party holding one copy,
and it will take effect from the date of signing.


 


/s/ Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd. 


Party A: Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Date: May 21, 2020


 


/s/ Wenhao Zhang


Party B: Wenhao Zhang


Date: May 21, 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2766 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2766

 To make improvements to the transitional program for covered business 
                method patents, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2013

Mr. Issa (for himself and Ms. Chu) introduced the following bill; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make improvements to the transitional program for covered business 
                method patents, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping the Offensive Use of 
Patents Act'' or the ``STOP Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO TRANSITIONAL PROGRAM FOR COVERED BUSINESS 
              METHOD PATENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 18 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act 
(35 U.S.C. 321 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (3); and
            (2) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ``a financial product 
        or'' and inserting ``an enterprise, a product, or a''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) Removal of sunset.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) 
        of subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Definition of covered business method patent.--The 
        amendment made by paragraph (2) of subsection (a) shall apply 
        as if included in the enactment of the Leahy-Smith America 
        Invents Act.

SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF PRO BONO PROGRAM AT THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND 
              TRADEMARK OFFICE.

    (a) In General.--The Director of the Office shall work with and 
support intellectual property law associations throughout the United 
States, within established pro bono programs, to assist financially 
under-resourced resellers, users, implementers, distributors, or 
customers of an allegedly infringing product or process.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Director.--The term ``Director'' means the Under 
        Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of 
        the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
            (2) Office.--The term ``Office'' means the United States 
        Patent and Trademark Office.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Thomas Eric Gill, an Attorney, Resignor.

Second Department,

May 28, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Stephen A. Grossman*for resignor.

*Frank A. Finnerty, Jr.,*for Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Thomas Eric Gill has submitted an affidavit dated February 18, 1991, wherein he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law (22 NYCRR 691.9). Mr. Gill was admitted to the practice of law by this court on March 16, 1977.

Mr. Gill acknowledges that he is the subject of an investigation by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District concerning allegations that he converted $90,000 of client funds for his own purposes. The respondent has made restitution and promises to refund any interest owing or *94confess judgment for the interest when funds are available to do so.

Mr. Gill indicates that he could not successfully defend himself on the merits against charges predicated upon the misconduct outlined in his affidavit of resignation, that his resignation is freely and voluntarily tendered, that he is not being subjected to coercion or duress, and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation.

The chief counsel for the Grievance Committee recommends that the court accept the resignation. Under the circumstances herein, the resignation of Thomas Eric Gill as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed. Accordingly, Thomas Eric Gill is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the resignation of Thomas Eric Gill is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Thomas Eric Gill is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that Thomas Eric Gill shall promptly comply with this court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Thomas Eric Gill is commanded to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of First Point Minerals Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|Date:  February 24, 2004 | Signed:  /s/ Peter Bradshaw_________
Peter Bradshaw,
President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |                                                                                           
|                         |                                                                                           
|                         |                                                                                           
|                         |                                                                                           
|                         |                                                                                           
|Date:  February 23, 2004 | Signed:  /s/ J. Christopher Mitchell___
J. Christopher Mitchell
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2

                                CERTIFICATION
          Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Kemmeth L. Johnson, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of St. Joseph, Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
    make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
    statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
    this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
    material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
    cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
    this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
    amended) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
    information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
    particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
    prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
    annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
    evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
    committee of the registrant's board of directors:

    a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
    controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
    process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
    registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
    and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
    annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
    controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
    controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
    corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
    weaknesses.

Dated:  April 14, 2004

/s/Kenneth L. Johnson
Kenneth L. Johnson
Secretary/Treasurer/Director
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

SOUTH TEXAS FRAC, LLC §

Plaintiff §

§

V. § CIVL ACTION NO. 20-cv-00678

§

PHOENIX PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO. § 

Defendant §

AGREED ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY

Upon consideration of the parties’ Agreed Motion for Continuance and request for 

additional discovery, the Court hereby ORDERS the following:

• The Court GRANTS Defendant Phoenix Process Equipment’s request to take the 

depositions of Cesar Saenz and Matt King and ORDERS that Defendant Phoenix 

Process Equipment, Co. may take the depositions of Cesar Saenz and Matt King on 

an agreeable date and time.

• The Court DENIES Defendant Phoenix Process Equipment’s request to take the 

deposition of Collin McCurley.

• The Court GRANTS Defendant Phoenix Process Equipment’s request to take the 

deposition of David Durrett and ORDERS that Defendant Phoenix Process 

Equipment, Co. may take the deposition of David Durrett on an agreeable date and 

time.

• The Court DENIES Defendant Phoenix Process Equipment’s request to take the 

deposition of Brandon White of PropTester, Inc.

• The Court GRANTS Defendant Phoenix Process Equipment’s request to continue 

attempts to secure compliance of its issuance of Deposition on Written Question 

and Subpoena issued to ThermalKinetics, including the issuance of Letters 

Rogatory. The Court DENIES Defendant Phoenix Process Equipment’s requests to 

depose a representative of Thermal Kinetics at this time.

• The Court GRANTS Defendant Phoenix Process Equipment’s request to continue 

the Court mandated inspection and collection of samples at the site of the plant at 

issue, which is to be limited to one round of sample collections from the wet and 

dry plant on an agreeable date and time.

Case 5:20-cv-00678-OLG-HJB Document 161 Filed 10/15/21 Page 1 of 2
SIGNED on the ____ day of _________________________, 2021.

________________________________________________ 

THE HONORABLE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00678-OLG-HJB Document 161 Filed 10/15/21 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5423 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5423

 To suspend temporarily the duty on footwear for men with outer soles 
 and uppers of rubber or plastics, covering the ankle, other than work 
                               footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

Mr. Huelskamp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on footwear for men with outer soles 
 and uppers of rubber or plastics, covering the ankle, other than work 
                               footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FOOTWEAR FOR MEN WITH OUTER SOLES AND UPPERS OF RUBBER OR 
              PLASTICS, COVERING THE ANKLE, OTHER THAN WORK FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Footwear with       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          outer soles and                                                   12/31/2015
                          uppers of rubber
                          or plastics,
                          covering the
                          ankle, other than
                          work footwear,
                          the foregoing for
                          men (provided for
                          in subheading
                          6402.91.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

May 7, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Ferrari Meeting with EPA Regarding Proposal for 2017-2025 Light-Duty (LD) 

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Standards

FROM: Robin Moran, Senior Policy Advisor

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

This memo documents a meeting held on May 3, 2012 between representatives of Ferrari and 

EPA to discuss EPA’s request for comment on a concept of operational independence in the LD 

GHG proposed rule. The meeting attendees included the following:

Ferrari

David Wertheim, Roberto Fedeli, Jean Jacques His, Sabina Fascioli, Brad Stott, and Richard 

Penna (outside counsel)

EPA

Chet France, William Charmley, Robin Moran, Linc Wehrly

The discussion centered on Ferrari’s interest in a provision that would allow a company to apply 

to EPA for status as operationally independent from its parent company and thereby receive 

status as a small volume manufacturer. Ferrari provided the attached 3 pages of information (2 

additional pages were provided but claimed as confidential business information). EPA 

indicated that no decisions have been made yet regarding the final rule provisions on this issue.

Attachment