alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense (DoD) announces a meeting of the Defense Partnership Council. Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This meeting is open to the public. The agenda will include: an update on the Blue Collar Wage Setting project and other topics related to the enhancement of Labor-Management partnerships throughout DoD.

# DATES:

The meeting is to be held on November 9, 2000, in room 1E801, Conference Room 7, the Pentagon, from 1 p.m. until 3 p.m. Comments should be received by November 1, 2000, in order to be considered at the November 9 meeting.

# ADDRESSES:

We invite persons and organizations to submit written comments or recommendations. Mail or deliver your comments or recommendations to Ben James at the address shown below. Seating is limited and available on a first-come, first-serve basis. Individuals wishing to attend who do not possess an appropriate Pentagon building pass should call the below listed telephone number to obtain instructions for entry into the Pentagon. Handicapped individuals wishing to attend should also call the below listed telephone number to obtain appropriate accommodations.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ben James, Chief, Labor Relations Branch, Field Advisory Services Division, Defense Civilian Personnel Management Service, 1400 Key Blvd., Suite B-200, Arlington, VA 22209-5144, (703) 696-6301, ext. 730.

Dated: October 5, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-26168 Filed  10-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
#### McDANIEL v. STATE.

No. 22646.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 8, 1943.

Aubrey Davee, of Brady, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale *173in a dry area. The punishment assessed is a fine of $150.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question has been presented for review. The information and all matters of procedure appear to be in regular form.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
| Subsidiary and Name Under WhichBusiness is Done |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporationor Organization |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                          |   |                                                        |
| Access      National Bank                                                     |   | United      States                                          |
| Access      National Leasing Corporation (inactive)                           |   | Virginia                                                    |
| Access      National Mortgage Corporation                                     |   | Virginia                                                    |
| Access      National Real Estate LLC                                          |   | Virginia                                                    |
| United      First Mortgage Corporation (inactive)                             |   | Virginia                                                    |
| Access      National Capital Trust I (inactive)                               |   | Virginia                                                    |
| Access      National Capital Trust II                                         |   | Virginia                                                    |

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5363 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-(1-Ethoxyethoxy) styrene-4- (tbutylcarbonyloxy) styrene-4-hydroxystyrene copolymer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. DOLD (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-(1-Ethoxyethoxy) styrene-4- (t-butylcarbonyloxy) styrene-4-hydroxystyrene copolymer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-(1-ETHOXYETHOXY) STYRENE-4- (T4 BUTYLCARBONYLOXY) STYRENE-4- 

5 HYDROXYSTYRENE COPOLYMER. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5363 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4-(1-Ethoxyethoxy) styrene-4- (tbutylcarbonyloxy) styrene4-hydroxystyrene copolymer (CAS No. 177034– 

75–2) (provided for in subheading 3903.90.5000) ..... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5571 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-methyl-5- 

nitrobenzenesulfonic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-methyl5-nitrobenzenesulfonic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-METHYL-5-NITROBENZENESULFONIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.23 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2-methyl-5-nitrobenzenesulfonic acid) is amended by strik7 ing the date in the effective period column and inserting 

8 ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5571 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26555]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER00-936-000 and ER00-936-003; ER00-937-000 and ER00-937-
003]


Southern Energy Delta, L.L.C. and Southern Energy Potrero, 
L.L.C.; Notice of Filing

October 11, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 28, 2000, Southern Energy Delta, 
L.L.C. (SE Delta) and Southern Energy Potrero, L.L.C. (SE Potrero) 
(collectively the Southern Parties) filed an Offer of Settlement which 
represents an integrated and complete resolution of issues in the 
above-captioned proceedings among and between the following parties 
(the Supporting Parties): the Southern Parties, the California 
Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO), and Pacific Gas and 
Electric Company (PG&E).
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before October 19, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26555 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### AUSTIN v. STATE.

No. 23114.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 2, 1945.

Jack Carter and W. E. Myres, both of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a sentence of five years in the penitentiary on a charge of theft.

*223The .appellant brings forward three bills of exception in the transcript but *the*record is before this court without a statement of facts. Therefore, the court is unable to appraise said bills of exception. Article 760, Vernon’s Ann. Code of Criminal Procedure, (cases cited under Note 6.)

Further, the bills are in question and answer form. The judge does not certify that it is necessary to have them in this form. Under the rules they cannot be considered. Jones v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 426, 154 S.W.2d 456; Hyde v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 457, 136 S.W.2d 850; Kodak v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 55, 165 S.W.2d 908.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-QPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

***Not Filed Pursuantto the Securities Exchange Act of 1934***

 

Solely for the purpose ofSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent thiscertification may be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersignedhereby certify that this report on Form 10-Q of Stewart & StevensonServices, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in thisreport on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Stewart & Stevenson Services,Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/  Michael L. Grimes |                                        |
|--------|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:                       | Michael L. Grimes                           |
|   | Title:                      | President and Chief  Executive Officer      |
|   |                        |                                        |
|   |                        |                                        |
|   | /s/  John B. Simmons   |                                        |
|   | Name:                       | John B. Simmons                             |
|   | Title:                      | Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                             |                                             |  |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

STANDING ORDER REGARDING

UPDATED ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS – PATENT CASES

On November 5, 2020, the Court published its latest Order Governing Proceedings for 

Patent Cases (OGP version 3.2).1 To improve judicial efficiency, the Court ORDERS that OGP 

version 3.2 shall apply retroactively to the Markman briefing in patent cases that are at least one 

week before the filing of the opening Markman brief. 2 The parties are directed to file an 

amended proposed scheduling order based on OGP version 3.2.

SIGNED this 9th day of November, 2020.

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 Available at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/wpcontent/uploads/Standing%20Orders/Waco/Albright/Sample%20Order%20Governing%20Proce

edings%20-%20Patent%20Cases110520.pdf

2

In other words, if the deadline for the parties’ opening Markman briefs is more than a week 

after the date of this standing order, the Markman briefing shall be governed by OGP version 

3.2.

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 32 Filed 11/09/20 Page 1 of 1
#### David Malacow, Appellant, v Consolidated Rail Corporation, Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Francis Pécora, J.), entered on March 23, 1989, after a jury trial, in favor of defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation, dismissing the plaintiffs complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, a former brakeman-conductor for the defendant, commenced the underlying action seeking monetary damages for personal injuries he allegedly sustained on November 13, 1984 when he tripped and fell on a broken step that was allegedly bent at a 45-degree angle, while attempting to board defendant’s engine No. 7546. Specifically, plaintiff alleged that the accident and resulting injuries were due solely to the negligence of the defendant, its agents, servants and employees, in failing to inspect and properly maintain its equipment, in violation of the Boiler Inspection Act (45 USC § 22*et seq.)*After hearing extensive testimony from both sides as to the alleged cause of the accident and the nature and extent of the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant, dismissing plaintiffs complaint.

On this record we find that there is no basis to disturb the jury verdict, and accordingly reject plaintiffs *pro se*challenge as to the credibility of the defendant’s witnesses and the propriety of the verdict itself. It is well settled that the *124resolution of conflicting evidence and the credibility of the witnesses is for the jury to determine. *(Boyle v Gretch,*57 AD2d 1047, 1048.)

The pertinent evidence adduced at trial consisted of conflicting testimony. A jury verdict in favor of a defendant will not be set aside unless the jurors could not have reached such a verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence. *(Niewieroski v National Cleaning Contrs.,*126 AD2d 424, 425, *lv denied*70 NY2d 602.) An examination of the record establishes that such is not the case herein.

We have reviewed the plaintiffs challenge with respect to the court’s refusal to give a missing document charge and find it to be without merit since the plaintiff has failed to sustain his burden of demonstrating that the documents in question actually existed and were in the control of the defendant *(Matter of Levine v Levine,*60 AD2d 652, 654). We decline to review plaintiffs challenge to the admissibility of certain videotaped evidence as unpreserved. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5712 

To authorize the Secretary of Labor to establish a pilot program to have 

community business leaders mentor members of the Armed Forces under 

the Transition Assistance Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois, and Mr. REICHERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Labor to establish a pilot 

program to have community business leaders mentor 

members of the Armed Forces under the Transition Assistance Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Jobs Act of 

5 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BUSINESS LEADER MENTOR PILOT PROGRAM. 

7 (a) PILOT PROGRAM.—In carrying out the Transition 

8 Assistance Program (including the Disabled Transition 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5712 IH

1 Assistance Program) under section 1144 of title 10, 

2 United States Code, the Secretary of Labor, in coopera3 tion with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 

4 Veterans Affairs, may establish a pilot program to assess 

5 the feasibility and advisability of using community busi6 ness leaders as mentors to facilitate the transition of mem7 bers of the Armed Forces who are being separated from 

8 active duty and the spouses of such members. 

9 (b) DURATION.—If the Secretary carries out the pilot 

10 program established under subsection (a), such program 

11 shall be carried out for a two-year period. 

12 (c) REPORT.— 

13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 18 months 

14 after the date on which the Secretary commences the 

15 pilot program established under subsection (a), the 

16 Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congres17 sional committees a report on such program, includ18 ing the findings of the Secretary with respect to the 

19 feasibility and advisability of using business leaders 

20 as mentors as described in subsection (a). 

21 (2) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMIT22 TEES DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘ap23 propriate congressional committees’’ means— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5712 IH

1 (A) the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs 

2 and Armed Services of the House of Represent3 atives; and 

4 (B) the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs 

5 and Armed Services of the Senate. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.a
                                CERTIFICATIONS

I, Douglas A. Starrett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The L.S. Starrett
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
(b) [Intentionally Omitted]
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial report;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date:  February 3, 2005             /s/  Douglas A. Starrett
                                    Douglas A. Starrett
                                    Chief Executive Officer
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 147 Filed 12/20/21 Page 1 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 147 Filed 12/20/21 Page 2 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 147 Filed 12/20/21 Page 3 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 147 Filed 12/20/21 Page 4 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 147 Filed 12/20/21 Page 5 of 5
Hon.Sam T. Holt

County Attorney Panola County Carthage,Texas Dear Sir: OpinionNo. O-I.230 Re: Does.

a man who,became 60 years of age.ln October, 1939, and who is not otherwiseexempt,have:topay a poll tax in order .to vote in the '1940 July primary? Your letter of recent date requestingthe opinion of this departmenton the above questionhas been given our careful consideration. Article 7046, Revised Civil8 Statutesof Texas, as pertinent to your Inquiry,provides: "There shall be levied and collectedfrom every person between the ages-of twenty-oneand sixty years, realdentwithin this state on the first day of January of~eachyear ~. an annual 011 tax of one dollar and fifty ($1.50)cents, one'dollar $1.00) for the benefit .ofthe free schoolsand fifty ($:50) cents for general revenuepurposes. Said taxshall be collected and accountedfor by the tax collectoreach year and appropriated as herein required.

. ." Article 2959, Revised Civil Statutesof Texas, provides, In part: "A poll~tax shall be collected from every person between the ages of twenty-oneand sixty years who resided In this state on the first day of Januarypreceding Its levy,

. It shall be paid at any time between the first day of October'andthe first day of February following;

. . ." Article 2960, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, provides, In part: "Everyperson who Is more than sixty years old. shall be entitled to vote without being required to pay a'poll tax, IfHon. Sam T. Halt, Page 2, O-1230

he has obtainedhis certificateof exemption from the courity tax collectorwhen the same Is requiredby the pi?ovlslons of this title." The clear effect of,these statutes Is that the poll tax Is levied as of January 1st of each year; Is payable at any time between the following 1st day 'of,:,October and lst,~day

of February; and confersupon the poll tax payer, when paid In accordance with the statutes,the rlght,tovote In the electionyear followingthe year of the.levy.~ In order to be exempt from the levy of the poll tax, and.hence from the payment)thereof, the individual

must have'beenexempt before January 1st of the year of the levy. Therefore,ln order to be exempt from the payment of the poll tax levied as of January lst, 1939, payable between October lst, 1939,.andFebruary lst, 190, whereby the voter may vote in 1940, the Individual must have been sixtyyears of age, or over, before January lst, 1939. It follows that your questionmust be answered In the afflrmatlve; namely, that the man who..becsme sixtyyears of age in October, 1939, must pay a poll tax In order to be entitled to vote in the July, 1940, pr3mary. Yours very truly, ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS By /s/ Zollle C. Steakley
ZCS:ob;egw;cge APPROVEDJAN 29, 1940 /a/ Gerald C. Mann ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TFXAS APPROVED:Opinion Committee

gY BWB, Chairman Zollle C. Steakley Assistant