alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q DATED
SEPTEMBER 26, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<CIK> 0000094673
<NAME> STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                       454,535
<SECURITIES>                                 246,010
<RECEIVABLES>                                492,689 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  276,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,469,241
<PP&E>                                       301,857 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,031,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        531,701
<BONDS>                                       20,352
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       6,223
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,441,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,031,736
<SALES>                                    1,038,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,480,787
<CGS>                                        567,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                810,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             149,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              203,003
<INCOME-TAX>                                  54,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          148,103
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 148,103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   2.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.00
<FN>
   <F1> Asset values for the interim period represent
        net amounts.
</FN>


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Enesco.
 May 12, 2006/s/ Cynthia PassmoreCynthia PassmorePresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Anthony G. TestolinAnthony G. TestolinChief Accounting Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO

______________________________________

MELODY JOY CANTU AND DR. RODRIGO 

CANTU,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DR. SANDRA GUERRA and DIGITAL 

FORENSICS CORPORATION, LLC,

Defendants.

5:20-CV-0746 JKP – HJB

______________________________________

PLAINTIFFS MELODY JOY CANTU AND DR. RODRIGO CANTU’S ADVISORY TO 

THE COURT REGARDING DR. GUERRA’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SCHEDULING 

ORDER AND FOR SANCTIONS.

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP-HJB Document 85 Filed 06/21/22 Page 1 of 4
1

Pursuant to the Court’s Order in Dkt. No. 75, Melody Joy Cantu’s and Dr. Rodrigo 

Cantu’s (“Plaintiffs”) counsel, conferred in good faith via Zoom meeting, regarding the specific 

relief requested in the motion filed by Co-Defendant Dr. Guerra in Dkt. No. 73. The following is 

Plaintiffs’’ advisory to the Court, as Co-Defendants opted to have their own Joint Advisory 

instead of a joint one including all parties:

1. Parties conferred via zoom meetings regarding the specific relief requested in the motion 

in Dkt. No. 73.

2. Parties could not come to an agreement on mediation and agreed to have the Court 

decide.

3. Parties then discussed the Joint Advisory. Plaintiffs’ counsel suggested filing one Joint 

Advisory. However, Counsel for Dr. Guerra, Ricardo G. Cedillo, stated he wanted to file 

a separate Joint Advisory, as that is the local practice in Texas.

4. Therefore, there are now two separate Advisories to the Court. One from Co-Defendants

and one from Plaintiffs.

5. Plaintiffs repeated their offer to mediate with Co-Defendant Digital Forensics 

Corporation, LLC (“DFC”). However, counsel for DFC stated they did not want to 

participate in mediation without Co-Defendant Dr. Guerra.

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP-HJB Document 85 Filed 06/21/22 Page 2 of 4
2

Dated: June 21, 2022

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Tor Ekeland

Tor Ekeland (NY Bar No. 4493631)

Pro Hac Vice

Tor Ekeland Law, PLLC

30 Wall Street, 8th Floor

New York, NY 

t: (718) 737 - 7264

f: (718) 504 - 5417

tor@torekeland.com

and

/s/ Rain Levy Minns

Rain Minns

State Bar No. 24034581

Minns Law Firm, P.C.

d/b/a Rain Minns Law Firm

4412 Spicewood Springs Rd., Suite 500

Austin, Texas 78759-8583

Tel.: 512-372-3222

Fax: 512-861-2403

rain@rainminnslaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs Melody Joy Cantu and 

Dr. Rodrigo Cantu

t

a

t

e 

B

a

r 

N

o

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP-HJB Document 85 Filed 06/21/22 Page 3 of 4
3

Certificate of Service

I certify that on this 21st of June 2022, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was electronically 

filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send electronic 

notification of such filing to the parties on record.

/s/ Tor Ekeland

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP-HJB Document 85 Filed 06/21/22 Page 4 of 4
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JESUS M ANUEL ZUNIGA, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-30095

D.C . No. 1:10-c r-00033-B LW M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ida

ho B . Ly nn W inm ill, C hie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 17, 2013 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, WALLAC E, a nd GR AB ER , C irc uit Judge s. Je sus M a n ue l Zuniga a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 24-m onth sta tutory m axim um se nte n c e im

pose d upon re voc ation of supe rvise d re le a se . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . Zuniga c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt proc e dura lly e rre d by c onfusing the 

# FIL ED JAN 03 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).24-m onth sta tutory m a xim um with thetop of the Guide line s ra nge whe n it im pose d the se nte nc e . W e re v ie w for pla in e rror, se e Unite d State s v . Vale nc iaBarragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th C ir. 2010), a nd find none . The re c ord re fle c ts that the distric t c ourt wa s a

ware of the a

pplic a ble Guide line s ra

nge and sim

p ly m isspokewhe n it sta

te d tha t 24 m onths wa s at the top of theGuide line s ra nge . Furthe rm ore , a

ny e rror did not a ffe c t Zuniga ’ s substa ntia l rights. Se eUnite d

State s v . Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 734-35 (1993) . W e de c line to c onside r Zuniga ’ s a rgum e nt tha

t the distric t c ourt fa ile d to e xpla in the se nte nc e , be c a use he ra ise d it for thefirst tim e in the re ply brie f. Se e Unite d State s v . Me jia-Pime ntal , 477 F.3d 1100, 1105 n.9 (9th C ir. 2007). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 3 0 0 9 5 2
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Securities and Exchange Commission Release
34-46427

I, Attila Reisz, the principal financial officer of 10Charge, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of 10Charge, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: July 7, 2004
                                                     /s/ Attila Reisz
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Principal Financial Officer


                                       1
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 0 5 8 7

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : M o n d a y

, A u g u s t 1 0

, 2 0 1 5 2 : 0 2 P M

T o : m a r c

. c a m e r a @ g m a i l

. c o m

D e a r M r

. W i e r c i o c h :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

− 2 0 1 5

− 0 5 8 7 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r

8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e

c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y

o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y

o u r i n t e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t e d

r e s p o n s e d a t e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f

e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 9 6 7 7

.

S i n c e r e l y

,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.9

                                                   [COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS LOGO]

                                                     400 Countrywide Way
March 15, 2005                               Simi Valley, California 93065-6298

RWT HOLDINGS, INC.
591 Redwood Hwy, # 3140
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Attn: Gloria Li

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am the First Vice President, Loan
Administration of Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., fka Countrywide Funding
Corporation. I further certify, with respect to the Servicing Agreements for
Countrywide Mortgage Obligations, Inc., the following:

I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004 under the Agreements and, to the best of my
knowledge, based on my review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties,
responsibilities or obligations under the Agreements throughout the fiscal year.

/s/ Joseph Candelario               March 15, 2005
---------------------               --------------
Joseph Candelario                   Date
First Vice President
Compliance Officer
Loan Administration

re: Investor Numbers: 7001476, 7001629, 7001755
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Boston Life Sciences, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:



|1) |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) |  | the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    ROBERT J.
ROSENTHALRobert J. Rosenthal Director, Chief Executive Officer and President/s/    JOSEPH P.
HERNONJoseph P. Hernon Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
SecretaryDated: May 15, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of StockerYale, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Marianne Molleur, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Marianne Molleur   
|Marianne Molleur       
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 15, 2006
.. 

SERVED: JANUARY 7, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TIMOTHY GAUNA 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0870 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On August 3, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed a 

Complaint. On July 19, 2012, Respondent Timothy Gatma ("Respondent") had requested a 

hearing. On January 7, 2013, Complainant moved to withdraw its Complaint and dismiss the 

case, citing settlement. 

14 C.F.K § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney 

may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the 

consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or 

a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative law judge 

shall dismiss the proceedings tmder this subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within tiled Withdrawal of Complaint having been read and 

considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 
2 

1. Complainant's Withdrawal of Complaint be and is hereby granted; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

(),_() I() 

10 2-0--J C. ~~.:._ BQ 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001 

Timothy Gauna, Respondent 

2516 Lincoln Street 

Evanston, IL 60201 

Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7B 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7862 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366:.7536 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0870 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration. 600 

Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing 

Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Fish Biomass_Conversion Factor.7.14.09.xls

Author: Abt Associates Inc. and Stratus Consulting

Created: 7/14/09

Purpose: Conversion factor to translate units from pounds to the number of fish.

Worksheet Description

Conversion Factor N Atl

Conversion Factor to translate units from pounds to

the number of fish. Calculated as estimated

regional total annual foregone recreational yield in

pounds divided by the estimate in the number of

fish.

File Info 1 of 2
Conversion Factor to translate units from pounds to the number of fish.

Source: Stratus Consulting Inc.

region species Conversion Factor

n. atlantic striped bass 3.840

n. atlantic atlantic cod 1.952

n. atlantic bluefish 1.978

n. atlantic butterfish 0.663

n. atlantic cunner 0.217

n. atlantic atlantic mackerel 0.707

n. atlantic pollock 6.754

n. atlantic rainbow smelt 0.073

n. atlantic scup 1.175

n. atlantic searobin 0.614

n. atlantic tautog 4.166

n. atlantic weakfish 3.372

n. atlantic white perch 0.321

n. atlantic windowpane 0.264

n. atlantic winter flounder 1.159

# of fish= pounds/Factor

Metric Ton to Pounds Conversion Factor

2,204.59

Pounds= metric ton* Factor

Available only for North Atlantic. Calculated as

estimated regional total annual foregone recreational

yield in pounds divided by the estimate in the number of

fish.

Conversion Factor N Atl 2 of 2
#### CAMPBELL CLEANING & DYE WORKS Inc., v. BARNWELL.

No. 4370.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

June 1, 1944.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1944.

Callaway & Reed and O. D. Montgomery, all of Dallas, for appellant.

Ellis P. House and Albert S. Reagan, both of Dallas, for appellee.

SUTTON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the County Court at Law, Number Two, of Dallas County.' It is a companion case with Campbell Cleaning & Dye Works, Inc., v. Jack Porter et ux., 183 S.W.2d 253, this, day decided by this Court. The trial was to the court without a jury. The appellant declined to accept the Statement of Facts prepared by the Reporter; the parties could not agree upon the facts, and the court prepared and filed a statement. On request the Court filed Findings and Conclusions.

The points presented are like those presented in the companion case. The essential facts necessary for a determination of the appeal are almost exactly the same as in the other case. What is said in the other case applies fully to this case and determines it, and it would serve no purpose to repeat what has been said there here.

There is one difference found in this case. An attorney’s fee of $20 was recovered. Appellee in her brief states the fee is remitted to avoid the point, but there is no release or entry found in the record. The contention here, as in the other case, is the fee is not recoverable, because no provision is made for it in Art. 5169, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., nor is it recoverable under any provision of law. To this we cannot agree. We think it recoverable under Art. 2226, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. The fee is recoverable on the basis, under the article as “personal services rendered” and “labor done.”

The judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Charles A. Hinrichs, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Charles A. Hinrichs                           |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Charles A. Hinrichs                               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| May 5, 2006                                       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,has been provided to Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. and will beretained by Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----