60684 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 198 / Thursday, October 12, 2000 / Notices

should contact Barbara Isaac,

Repatriation Coordinator, Peabody

Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology,

Harvard University, 11 Divinity Avenue,

Cambridge, MA 02138, telephone (617)

495–2254, before November 13, 2000.

Repatriation of the human remains to

the Klamath Indian Tribe of Oregon may

begin after that date if no additional

claimants come forward.

Dated: October 4, 2000.

John Robbins,

Assistant Director, Cultural Resources,

Stewardship and Partnerships.

[FR Doc. 00–26145 Filed 10–11–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337–TA–437]

Certain Synchronous Dynamic

Random Access Memory Devices and

Modules and Products Containing

Same; Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a

complaint was filed with the U.S.

International Trade Commission on

September 11, 2000, under section 337

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,

19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Rambus

Inc. of Mountain View, California. A

supplemental letter was filed on

September 26, 2000. The complaint, as

supplemented, alleges violations of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

and the sale within the United States

after importation of certain synchronous

dynamic random access memory

devices and modules and products

containing same by reason of

infringement of claims 1–24, 27, and

32–39 of U.S. Letters Patent 6,038,195,

claims 1–5, 14–17, 27–28, and 30–33 of

U.S. Letters Patent 5,953,263, and

claims 1–3, 6–10, 13–16, 18–21, 24–26,

29–31, 33–34, and 37–38 of U.S. Letters

Patent 6,034,918. The complaint further

alleges that there exists, or is in the

process of being established, an industry

in the United States as required by

subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

The complainant requests that the

Commission institute an investigation

and, after the investigation, issue a

permanent exclusion order and a

permanent cease and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint and

supplement, except for any confidential

information contained therein, are

available for inspection during official

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC

20436, telephone 202–205–2000.

Hearing impaired individuals are

advised that information on this matter

can be obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility

impairments who will need special

assistance in gaining access to the

Commission should contact the Office

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may be obtained by

accessing its Internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karin J. Norton, Esq., Office of Unfair

Import Investigations, U.S. International

Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–

2606.

Authority: The authority for institution of

this investigation is contained in section 337

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10

(2000).

Scope of Investigation: Having

considered the complaint, the U.S.

International Trade Commission, on

October 5, 2000, ordered that—

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, an investigation be instituted

to determine whether there is a

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

or the sale within the United States after

importation of certain synchronous

dynamic random access memory

devices or modules or products

containing same by reason of

infringement of claims 1–24, 27, or 32–

39 of U.S. Letters Patent 6,038,195,

claims 1–5, 14–17, 27–28, or 30–33 of

U.S. Letters Patent 5,953,263, or claims

1–3, 6–10, 13–16, 18–21, 24–26, 29–31,

33–34, or 37–38 of U.S. Letters Patent

6,034,918, and whether there exists, or

is in the process of being established, an

industry in the United States as required

by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

(2) For the purpose of the

investigation so instituted, the following

are hereby named as parties upon which

this notice of investigation shall be

served:

(a) The complainant is—Rambus Inc.,

2465 Latham Street, Mountain View, CA

94040.

(b) The respondents are the following

companies alleged to be in violation of

section 337, and are the parties upon

which the complaint is to be served:

Hyundai Electronics Industries Co.,

Ltd., San 136–1, Amiri, Bubal-eub

Ichon-kun, Kyoungki-do, Korea

Hyundai Electronics America, 3101

North First Street, San Jose, California

95134

(c) Karin J. Norton, Office of Unfair

Import Investigations, U.S. International

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,

Room 401–A, Washington, DC 20436,

who shall be the Commission

investigative attorney, party to this

investigation; and

(3) For the investigation so instituted,

the Honorable Sidney Harris is

designated as the presiding

administrative law judge.

Responses to the complaint and the

notice of investigation must be

submitted by the named respondents in

accordance with section 210.13 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such

responses will be considered by the

Commission if received no later than 20

days after the date of service by the

Commission of the complaint and the

notice of investigation. Extensions of

time for submitting responses to the

complaint will not be granted unless

good cause therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely

response to each allegation in the

complaint and in this notice may be

deemed to constitute a waiver of the

right to appear and contest the

allegations of the complaint and to

authorize the administrative law judge

and the Commission, without further

notice to the respondent, to find the

facts to be as alleged in the complaint

and this notice and to enter both an

initial determination and a final

determination containing such findings,

and may result in the issuance of a

limited exclusion order or a cease and

desist order or both directed against

such respondent.

Issued: October 5, 2000.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–26217 Filed 10–11–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P