alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Panaro, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The hearing court properly denied defendant’s motion for a *Franks*hearing *(see, Franks v Delaware,*438 US 154) because defendant failed to make a "substantial preliminary showing that a false statement was knowingly and intentionally included” in Investigator Fuhrman’s affidavit in support of the application for an eavesdropping warrant *(People v Ingram,*79 AD2d 1088; *see also, People v Solimine,*18 NY2d 477).

The court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for a *Darden*hearing *(see, People v Darden,*34 NY2d 177) with respect to evidence supplied by secondary confidential informants because, apart from that evidence, sufficient independent evidence existed to establish probable cause for the issuance of the eavesdropping warrant. Further, the information provided by the primary confidential informant satisfied the *Aguilar-Spinelli*test *(see, Aguilar v Texas,*378 US 108; *Spinelli v United States,*393 US 410).

We reject defendant’s contention that the application for the eavesdropping warrant was not supported by a sufficient showing that the police exhausted normal investigative procedures *(see,*CPL 700.15 [4]; 700.20 [2] [d]). Finally, the record reflects that the hearing court reviewed de novo the affidavit presented on the application for the search warrant and found that it sufficiently supported his finding of probable cause. "This independent review under the facts presented is all that is required” *(People v Delgado,*134 AD2d 951, *lv denied*71 NY2d 895, citing *People v Fino,*14 NY2d 160, 163). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.— conspiracy, second degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5738 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5738

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 29, 2012

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 15285 Samohin Drive in Macomb, Michigan, as the ``Lance Cpl. Anthony 
               A. DiLisio Clinton-Macomb Carrier Annex''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CPL. ANTHONY A. DILISIO CLINTON-MACOMB CARRIER ANNEX.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 15285 Samohin Drive in Macomb, Michigan, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lance Cpl. Anthony A. DiLisio Clinton-Macomb 
Carrier Annex''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance Cpl. 
Anthony A. DiLisio Clinton-Macomb Carrier Annex''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 28, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<LEGEND>
     TRANSMITTING STV GROUP'S FISCAL 2000 THIRD QUARTER FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                               0000095045
<NAME>                                              STV GROUP, INCORPORATED

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                        72,000
<SECURITIES>                                                  39,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                             34,948,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 190,000
<INVENTORY>                                               18,612,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          54,670,000
<PP&E>                                                     7,489,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                             4,494,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            61,328,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     33,973,000
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                   2,052,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                20,557,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              61,328,000
<SALES>                                                  110,590,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         110,590,000
<CGS>                                                     70,849,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             77,412,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           130,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            6,985,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                               3,247,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        3,738,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                               3,738,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.90



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gerald
McIlhargey, Chief Executive Officer of St. Joseph, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of St. Joseph, Inc.





By:
              /s/GERALD MCILHARGEYName:  Gerald
      McIlhargeyTitle:  Chief
      Executive Officer and PresidentDate:  March
      30, 2010
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*





In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Martin Midstream Partners L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ruben S. Martin, Chief Executive Officer of Martin Midstream GP LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1)          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





/s/ Ruben S. MartinRuben S. Martin,Chief Executive Officer of Martin Midstream GP LLC,General Partner of Martin Midstream Partners L.P.March 28, 2013





*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60968-60969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26252]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 94G-0267]


Fuji Oil Co., Ltd.; Withdrawal of GRAS Affirmation Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a petition (GRASP 
4G0407) proposing to affirm that the use of a triglyceride containing 
behenic and oleic acids is generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a 
tempering aid and as an antibloom agent in chocolate and chocolate 
coatings.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Parvin M. Yasaei, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3023.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal 
Register of August 17, 1994 (59 FR 42278), FDA announced that a 
petition (GRASP 4G0407) had been filed by Fuji Oil Co., Ltd., Osaka, 
Japan. This petition proposed that the use of a triglyceride containing 
behenic and oleic acids as a tempering aid and as an antibloom agent in 
chocolate and chocolate coatings be affirmed as GRAS. Fuji Oil Co., 
Ltd., has now withdrawn the petition without

[[Page 60969]]

prejudice to a future filing (21 CFR 171.7).

    Dated: September 27, 2000.
Alan M. Rulis,
Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 00-26252 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 200 (Monday, October 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26565]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

Public Announcement

    Pursuant To The Government In the Sunshine Act (Public Law 94-409) 
[5 U.S.C. Section 552b].
    Agency Holding Meeting: Department of Justice, United States Parole 
Commission.
    Date and Time: 12 p.m., Tuesday, October 17, 2000.
    Place: U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th 
Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.
    Status: Closed--Meeting.
    Matters Considered: The following matter will be considered during 
the closed portion of the Commission's Business Meeting:
Appeals to the Commission involving approximately three cases decided 
by the National Commissioners pursuant to a reference under 28 CFR 
2.27. These cases were originally heard by an examiner panel wherein 
inmates of Federal prisons have applied for parole or are contesting 
revocation of parole or mandatory release.
    Agency Contact: Sam Robertson, Case Operations, United States 
Parole Commission, (301) 492-5962.

    Dated: October 10, 2000.
Michael A. Stover,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-26565 Filed 10-12-00; 11:05 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

The undersigned officerof StockerYale, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’squarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. This certification isprovided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 
| Date: August 14, 2002 | Name:  | /s/**Francis J. O’Brien            |   |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Francis J. O’Brien                 |
|                  |   |                                    |
|                  |   |                                    |
|                  | Title: | Chief Financial Officer  and  Treasurer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly report of Cytation Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin J. High, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company./s/  Kevin J. High
Kevin J. High
President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Life Sciences, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kenneth L. Rice, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ KENNETH L. RICE, JR.Kenneth L. Rice, Jr. Executive Vice President Finance and Administration and Chief
Financial Officer




Date: August 15, 2005
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3043806-JUN-201107:49 AM
Group 3 – Google’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief 

(Civil Case Nos. 6:20-cv-00573-ADA, 6:20-cv-00575-ADA, 

6:20-cv-00577-ADA, and 6:20-cv-00585-ADA) 

EXHIBIT #12

Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-12 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-12 Filed 02/12/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-12 Filed 02/12/21 Page 3 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00573-ADA Document 34-12 Filed 02/12/21 Page 4 of 4
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 12(a)

<Table>
<Caption>

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Consolidated Subsidiary and Affiliate Companies
(Unaudited)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Three Months Ended June 30,
Millions of Dollars, Except Ratios                                         2002              2001
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                    <C>               <C>
Earnings:
      Net income ................................................      $    316          $    262
      Undistributed equity earnings .............................           (10)               (1)
                                                                       --------          --------
Total earnings ..................................................           306               261
                                                                       --------          --------
Income taxes ....................................................           182               157
                                                                       --------          --------
Fixed charges:
      Interest expense including amortization of debt discount ..           137               146
      Portion of rentals representing an interest factor ........            10                10
                                                                       --------          --------
Total fixed charges .............................................           147               156
                                                                       --------          --------
Earnings available for fixed charges ............................      $    635          $    574
                                                                       --------          --------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ..............................           4.3               3.7
                                                                       --------          --------
</Table>
#### ROBINSON v. ROBINSON.

No. 11196.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

July 29, 1942.

Oliver W. Johnson, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Leonard Brown, of San Antonio, for ap-pellee.

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an attempted appeal from an order granting a motion for new trial under the provisions of Rule 329, Rules of Civil Procedure, formerly Article 2236, Vernon’s Ann.Stats.

The original action resulted in appellant’s obtaining a decree of divorce from appellee.

The order from which the appeal is prosecuted sets aside the former judgment and awards appellee a new trial. It does not determine the cause of action for divorce which was originally asserted by appellant.

The order is interlocutory in nature and consequently the appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Lovenstein v. Lovenstein, Tex.Civ.App., 35 S.W.2d 271; Trujillo v. Piarote, 122 Tex. 173, 53 S.W.2d 466.
Exhibit 6

Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-6 Filed 06/12/20 Page 1 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-6 Filed 06/12/20 Page 2 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-6 Filed 06/12/20 Page 3 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-6 Filed 06/12/20 Page 4 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-6 Filed 06/12/20 Page 5 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-6 Filed 06/12/20 Page 6 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-6 Filed 06/12/20 Page 7 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-6 Filed 06/12/20 Page 8 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-6 Filed 06/12/20 Page 9 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-6 Filed 06/12/20 Page 10 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-6 Filed 06/12/20 Page 11 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-6 Filed 06/12/20 Page 12 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-6 Filed 06/12/20 Page 13 of 13
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark Blodgett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StockerYale, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer
and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in
this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|Date: May 15, 2007                   
|                                     
|/s/ Mark W. Blodgett                 
|Mark W. Blodgett                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer