# 0VGOU A ENVIRONMENTA L SERVICE S 

### Januar y28 , 201 4 Vi a FedE x 

# hl\ JA N

## 3 0 

## 201 4 \\ ] Attn : Complianc e Tracker , AE-17 J Ai rEnforcemen t an d Complianc e Assuranc e Branc h Unite d State s Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Regio n 5 7 7 W
. Jackso n Blvd. , AE-17 J Chicago , I L 6060 4
R E : Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C
. 163121AA P 4 0 CF R Par t 6 3 - Subpar t EE E Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo rHazardou s Ai rPollutant s fro m Hazardou s Wast e Combustor s Comprehensiv e Performanc e Tes t Report s an d Notificatio n o f Complianc e (NOC ) Complianc e Tracker , Pursuan t t o th e requirement s o f 4 0 CF R 63.1200 , subpar t EEE , Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , hereb ysubmit s th e Performanc e Tes t Report s fo rIncinerator s 2 , 3 an d 4 an d th e Notificatio n o f Complianc e (NOC)
. Th e NO C document s complianc e wit h th e emissio n standard s an d continuou s monitorin g syste m requirements , an d identifyin g operatin g parameter s define d i n 4 0 CF R 63.120 9 an d 63.1219
. Veoli a i s no wcomplyin g wit h al l operatin g requirement s specifie d i n thi s NOC
. Th e Performanc e Tes t Report s detai l complianc e wit h thes e standards
. I certif yunde rpenalt yo f la wtha t thi s documen t an d al l attachment s wer e prepare d unde rm ydirectio n o rsupervisio n i n accordanc e wit h a syste m designe d t o assur e tha t qualifie d personne l properl ygathe ran d evaluat e th e informatio n submitted
. Base d o n m yinquir yo f th e perso n o rperson s wh o manag e th e system , o rthos e person s directl yresponsibl e fo r gatherin g th e information , th e informatio n submitted , i s t o th e bes t o f m y
# 7 Mobil e Avenue , Sauget , I L 6220 1 (€18)271-280

4 www.veoliaes.co m

# Qveou A ENVIRONMENTA L 5ERVICE S 

### Complianc e Tracke r Januar y28 , 201 4 Pag e 2
knowledg e an d belief , true , accurate , an d complete
. I a m awar e tha t ther e ar e significan t penaltie s fo rsubmittin g fals e information , includin g th e possibilit yo f fin e an d imprisonmen t fo rknowin g violations
. Upo n revie wo f thi s submittal , shoul d th e Agenc yhav e a nee d fo radditiona l informatio n o rquestions , pleas e contac t Denni s Warcho l a t (618 ) 271-280 4 o rvi a e-mai l a t dennis.warchol@veolia.co m o rm e at (618 ) 271-280 4 o rvi a e-mai l a t douq.harris@veolia.com
. Sincerely , Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C
. Dou g Harri s Genera l Manage r Att
. cc : Mr
. Georg e Czerniak , Director , Ai ran d Radiatio n Divisio n USEP AFil e

# 7 Mobil e Avenue , Sauget , I L 6220 1 (618 ) 271-280

4 www.veoliaes.co m

# m i l

4 0 CF R §6 3 Subpar t EE E 4) 

## Comprehensiv e Performanc e Tes t Repo r Fixe d Heart h Incinerato r - Uni t 2 Fixe d Heart h Incinerato r - Uni t 3 Rotary Kil n Incinerato r - Uni t 4

Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C .

7 Mobil e Avenu e Sauget , I L 6220 1

Prepare d by : UR S Corporatio n 940 0 Ambergle n Blvd . Austin , T X 7872 9

Januar y 28 , 201 4 

## fo r

Prepare d for :

UR S Corporatio n 940 0 Ambergle n Boulevar d Austin , T

X 7872 9 P.O
. Bo x20108 8 Austin , T

X 78720-108 8 Tel : 512.454.479 7 Fax : 512.454.880 7 www.urscorp.co m

### Tabl e o f Content s Pag e 1. 0 Introduction 1- 1 1. 1 Incinerato r

Overvie w 1- 2 1. 2 Tes t

Objective s 1- 3 1. 3 Tes t

Protoco l Summary 1- 4 1. 4 CP T Schedul e 1- 9 1. 5 Summar

y o f Result s 1-1 0 1. 6 Repor

t Organizatio n 1-1 0 2. 0 Process Operations 2- 1 2. 1 Proces s Overvie w 2- 1 2. 2 Proces s Operatin g Dat aan dWast e Feedrate s 2- 6 2.2. 1 Uni t

2 2- 6 2.2. 2 Uni t

3 2- 6 2.2. 3 Uni t

4 2- 7 2. 3 Spikin g o f

Metal s an dChlorin e 2- 7 3. 0 Sampling , Analysis , and Monitorin g Procedure s 3- 1 3. 1 Samplin g Location s an dProcedure s 3- 1 3.1. 1 Liquid s Samplin g Procedure s 3- 1 3.1. 2 Solid s Samphn g Procedure s 3- 6 3.1. 3 Stac k

Ga s Samplin g Procedure s 3- 6 3.1.3. 1 Sampl e Port

Location s 3-1 0 3.1.3. 2 EP AMethod s 2 an d4 (Flowrat e an dMoisture ) 3-1 0 3.1.3. 3 EP AMetho d5 (PM ) 3-1 0 3.1.3. 4 Modifie dEP AMetho d26 A (HC1/C1 2 

### ) 3-1 1 3.1.3. 5 EP AMetho d2 9 (Metals ) 3-1 1 3.1.3. 6 SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A (Dioxins/Furans ) 3-1 2 3.1.3. 7 Continuou s Emission s Monitorin g (THC , C0 2 

### , C O an d0 2 

### ) 3-1 3 3. 2 Analysi s Procedure s 3-1 3 3.2. 1 Compositio n an dPhysica l Parameter s Analysi s 3-1 4 3.2. 2 Metal s Analysi s 3-1 4 3.2. 3 P M Analysi s 3-1 4 3.2. 4 HC1/C1 2

### Analysi s 3-1 4 3.2. 5 Dioxins/Furan s Analysi s 3-1 5 3. 3 Proces s Monitorin g Procedure s 3-1 5

i i i

### Tabl e o f Content s (continued ) Pag e 4. 0 Result

s 4- 1 4. 1 Wast e Feedstream s 4- 1 4. 2 Stac k

Ga s 4-1 8 4.2. 1 P M i n Stac k

Ga s 4-1 8 4.2. 2 HC1/C1 2

### i n Stac k Ga s 4-2 2 4.2. 3 Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s 4-2 6 4.2. 4 Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s 4-3 4 4.2. 5 TH C i n Stac k

Ga s 4-3 9 4. 3 Chlorine , Ash , an dMetal s Feedrate s 4-4 1 4.3. 1 Chlorin e Feedrate s 4-4 1 4.3. 2 As hFeedrate s 4-4 1 4.3. 3 Metal s Feedrate s 4-4 8 5. 0 Qualit

y Assurance/Qualit

y Contro l 5- 1 5. 1 Audi t

Sample s 5- 2 5. 2 Analysi s o f

Wast e Feed s 5- 2 5.2. 1 Analysi s o f

Wast e Feed s fo r

Metal s 5- 2 5.2. 2 Analysi s o f

Wast e Feed s fo r

Physica l an dChemica l Parameter s 5- 4 5. 3 Stac k

Ga s 5- 5 5.3. 1 Isokineti c Sampl e Collectio n 5- 5 5.3. 2 Analysi s o f

Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r

Determinatio n o f

P M 5- 6 5.3. 3 Analysi s o f

Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r

Determinatio n o f

HC1/C1 2 5- 6 5.3. 4 Analysi s o f

Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r

Determinatio n o f

Metal s 5- 7 5.3. 5 Analysi s o f

Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r

Determinatio n o f

Dioxins/Furan s 5- 8 5.3. 6 Monitorin g o f

Stac k Ga s fo r 0 2 

### , C0 2 

### , an dTH C 5- 9 5. 4 Proces s Dat a5- 9 5. 5 Spikin g 5-1 0

i v

### Lis t o f Appendice s

APPENDI X A -CEM S RAT AReport s APPENDI X B - Spikin g Report APPENDI X C - Proces s Operatin g Dat a APPENDI X D - CM S Performanc e Evaluatio n Tes t Repor t APPENDI X E - Chains-of-Custody/Fiel dLogboo k APPENDI X F - Samplin g Documentatio n APPENDI X G-Analytica l Dat aReport s

APPENDI X G l - Laborator y Report s - Analysi s o f Liqui dan dSoli dWast e Fee d Sample s fo r

Metals , Tota l Chlorine , Ash , an dPhysica l Parameter s APPENDI X G2

- Laborator y Report s - Analysi s o f Stac k Sample s fo r Dioxins/Furan s APPENDI X G 3 - Laborator y Report s - Analysi s o f Stac k Sample s fo r

Metal s APPENDI X G 4 - Laborator y Report s - Analysi s o f Stac k Sample s fo r

Particulat e Matter , Hydroge n Chloride , an dChlorin e APPENDI X G 5 - Laborator y Report s - Analysi s o f Spik e Material s APPENDI X G 6 - Audi t Repor t APPENDI X H- Dat aQualit y Assessment s APPENDI X I - Samplin g Equipment/Instrumentatio n Calibratio n Documentatio n

v

### Lis t o f Table s Pag e

1 - 1 Applicabl e HW C MAC T Emissio n Standard s 1- 3 1 - 2 Dat aUse dT o Establis hOPL s 1-8 1-3 Uni t

2 Complianc e Summary 1-1 1 1 - 4 Uni t

3 Comphanc e Summary 1-1 2 1

- 5 Uni t

4 Complianc e Summary 1-1 3
2

- 1 Uni t

2 - Summary o f

Proces s Dat aan dFeedrate s Durin g the EP AMetho d5 Stac k Samplin g fo r

P M 2- 8 2- 2 Uni t

2 - Summary o f

Proces s Dat aan dFeedrate s Durin g the Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A Stac k

Samplin g fo r

HC1/C1 2

### 2- 9 2- 3 Uni t

2 - Summary o f

Proces s Dat aan dFeedrate s Durin g the EP AMetho d2 9 Stac k Samplin g fo r

Metal s 2-1 0 2- 4 Uni t

2 - Summary o f

Proces s Dat aan dFeedrate s Durin g the SW-84 6 MethodO O 2 3 A Stac k Samplin g fo r

Dioxins/Furan s 2-1 1 2- 5 Uni t

3 - Summary o f

Proces s Dat aan dFeedrate s Durin g the EP AMetho d5 Stac k Samplin g fo r

P M 2-1 2 2- 6 Uni t

3 - Summary o f

Proces s Dat aan dFeedrate s Durin g the Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A Stac k

Samplin g fo r

HC1/C1 2

### 2-1 3 2- 7 Uni t

3 - Summary o f

Proces s Dat aan dFeedrate s Durin g the EP AMetho d2 9 Stac k Samplin g fo r

Metal s 2-1 4 2- 8 Uni t

3 - Summary o f

Proces s Dat aan dFeedrate s Durin g the SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A Stac k Samplin g fo r

Dioxins/Furan s 2-1 5 2- 9 Uni t

4 - Summary o f

Proces s Dat aan dFeedrate s Durin g the EP AMetho d5 Stac k Samplin g fo r

P M 2-1 6 2-1 0 Uni t

4 - Summary o f

Proces s Dat aan dFeedrate s Durin g the Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A Stac k

Samplin g fo r

HC1/C1 2

### 2-1 7 2-1 1 Uni t

4 - Summary o f

Proces s Dat aan dFeedrate s Durin g the EP AMetho d2 9 Stac k Samplin g fo r

Metal s 2-1 8 2-1 2 Uni t

4 - Summary o f

Proces s Dat aan dFeedrate s Durin g the SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A Stac k Samplin g fo r

Dioxins/Furan s 2-1 9 2-1 3 Uni t

2 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g the HC1/HC1 2

### Stac k Samplin g 2-2 0 2-1 4 Uni t

3 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g the HC1/HC1 2

### Stac k Samplin g 2-2 0 2-1 5 Uni t

4 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g the HC1/HC1 2

### Stac k Samplin g 2-2 0 2-1 6 Uni t

2 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g the Metal s Stac k Samplin g 2-2 1 2-1 7 Uni t

3 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g the Metal s Stac k Samplin g 2-2 1 2-1 8 Uni t

4 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g the Metal s Stac k Samplin g 2-2 1

v i

### Lis t o f Table s (continued ) Pag e 2-1 9 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r the Chromiu mSpikin g Solutio n 2-2 2 2-2 0 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r the Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n 2-2 2 2-2 1 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Result s fo r the Chromiu mSpikin g Solutio n 2-2 3 2-2 2 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Result s fo r the Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n 2-2 3 2-2 3 Uni t

4 - Analytica l Result s fo r the Chromiu mSpikin g Solutio n 2-2 4 2

- 2 4 Uni t

4 - Analytica l Result s fo r the Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n 2-2 4 3

- 1 Measuremen t

Frequenc y 3- 3 3- 2 Samplin g Method s 3- 4 3- 3 Uni t

2 - Summary o f

Isokineti c Samplin g 3- 7 3- 4 Uni t

3 - Summary o f

Isokineti c Samplin g 3- 8 3- 5 Uni t

4 - Summary o f

Isokineti c Samplin g 3- 9 3

- 6 Summary o f

Analytica l Method s 3-1 3 4

- 1 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , andPhysica l Parameter s i nthe Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Fee d4- 5 4- 2 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , andPhysica l Parameter s i nthe Ffigh-Bt u Liqui dWast e Fee d4- 6 4- 3 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s andPhysica l Parameter s i nthe Specialt y Liqui dWast e Fee d4- 7 4- 4 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an dPhysica l Parameter s i nthe Containerize dSolid s Waste Fee d4- 8 4- 5 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an dPhysica l Parameter s i nthe Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Fee d4- 9 4- 6 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , andPhysica l Parameter s i nthe Fligh-Bt u Liqui dWast e Fee d4-1 0 4- 7 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an dPhysica l Parameter s i nthe Specialt y Liqui dWast e Fee d4-1 1 4- 8 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an dPhysica l Parameter s i nthe Containerize dSolid s Wast e Fee d4-1 2

vi i

### Lis t of Table s (continued ) Pag e

4- 9 Uni t

4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an dPhysica l Parameter s i nthe Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Fee dto the Kil n4-1 3 4-1 0 Uni t

4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an dPhysica l Parameter s i nthe High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Fee dto the Kil n4-1 4 4-1 1 Uni t

4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an dPhysica l Parameter s i nthe Liqui dWast e Fee dto the SC C 4-1 5 4-1 2 Uni t

4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an dPhysica l Parameter s i nthe Containerize dSolid s Wast e Fee d4-1 6 4-1 3 Uni t

4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an dPhysica l Parameter s i nthe Bul k

Solid s Wast e Fee d4-1 7 4-1 4 Uni t

2 - Result s o f

P M i n Stac k

Ga s 4-1 9 4-1 5 Uni t

3 - Result s o f

P M i n Stac k

Ga s 4-2 1 4-1 6 Uni t

4 - Result s o f

P M i n Stac k

Ga s 4-2 2 4-1 7 Uni t

2 - Result s o f

HC1/C1 2

### i n Stac k

Ga s 4-2 3 4-1 8 Uni t

3 - Result s o f

HC1/C1 2

### i n Stac k

Ga s 4-2 5 4-1 9 Uni t

4 - Result s o f

HC1/C1 2

### i n Stac k

Ga s 4-2 5 4-2 0 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s 4-2 7 4-2 1 Uni t

2 - Result s o f

Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s 4-2 8 4-2 2 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s 4-2 9 4-2 3 Uni t

3 - Result s o f

Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s 4-3 0 4-2 4 Uni t

4 - Analytica l Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s 4-3 2 4-2 5 Uni t

4 - Result s o f

Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s 4-3 3 4-2 6 Uni t

2 - Result s o f

Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s 4-3 5 4-2 7 Uni t

3 - Result s o f

Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s 4-3 7 4-2 8 Uni t

4 - Result s o f

Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s 4-3 8 4-2 9 Uni t

2 - Result s o f

TH C i n Stac k

Ga s 4-3 9 4-3 0 Uni t

3 - Result s o f

TC H i n Stac k

Ga s 4-4 0 4-3 1 Uni t

4 - Result s o f

TH C i n Stac k

Ga s 4-4 0 4-3 2 Uni t

2 - Chlorin e Feedrate 3-4 2 4-3 3 Uni t

3 - Chlorin e Feedrate 3-4 3 4-3 4 Uni t

4 - Chlorin e Feedrate 3-4 4

vii i

### Lis t o f Table s (continued ) Pag e 4-3 5 Uni t

2 - As hFeedrate Durin g th e EP A Metho d5 Stac k

Samplin g fo r

P M 4-4 5 4-3 6 Uni t

3 - As hFeedrate Durin g th e EP A Metho d5 Stac k

Samplin g fo r

P M 4-4 6 4-3 7 Uni t

4 - As hFeedrate Durin g the EP A Metho d5 Stac k Samplin g fo r

P M 4-4 7 4-3 8 Uni t

2 - Metal s Feedrat

e 4-4 9 4-3 9 Uni t

2 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrat e 4-5 1 4-4 0 Uni t

3 - Metal s Feedrate 4-5 2 4-4 1 Uni t

3 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrat e 4-5 3 4-4 2 Uni t

4 - Metal s Feedrat

e 4-5 4 4-4 3 Uni t

4 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrat e 4-5 6 5 - 1 Result s o f

Analysi s o f

Audi t S ample s 5- 2


### Lis t of Figure s Pag e 2- 1 Uni t

2 Proces s Flo w Diagra m2- 3 2- 2 Uni t

3 Proces s Flo w Diagra m2- 4 2- 3 Uni t

4 Proces s Flo w Diagra m2- 5

i x

### 1. 0 Introductio n Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C
. (Veolia ) operate s thre e incinerator s a t it s Sauget , Hlinoi s facility
. Tw o o f th e incinerator s ar

e fixe dheart

hunit s (Unit s 2 an d3) , an dthe thir d incinerato r

i s arotary kil nuni t

(Uni t 4)
. Al l o f

the incinerator s trea

t certai n waste s tha

t ar e classifie da

s hazardou s under

stat e and/o r federa l regulations , an dar e subjec t to th e Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r

Pollutant s (NESHAPs ) fo r Hazardou s Wast e Combustor s (Titl e 4 0 o f th e Cod e o f

Federa l Regulations , Part 6 3 [4 0 CF RPart

63] , Subpar

t EEE) , (i.e. , the HW C MACT)
. I n Augus t

an dSeptember

o f 2008 , Veoli aconducte dtest s o f Unit s 2 , 3 , an d4 require db y th e informatio n collectio n request s fro mU.S
. EP A Regio n 5 date dJun e 5 , 200 8 an dSeptember 12 , 2008
. Thos e test s began o n Augus t 11 , 200 8 fo r

Uni t 2 , Augus t

5 , 200 8 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d Augus t 21 , 200 8 fo r

Uni t 4 followin g tes t

plan s approve db y U.S
. EP A Regio n 5
. Initia l Comprehensiv e Performanc e Test s (CPTs ) o f Unit s 2 , 3 , an d4 commence do n Decembe r 8 , 200 9 fo r Uni t 2 ; o n Decembe r

1 , 200 9 fo r

Uni t 3 ; an do n Decembe r

16 , 200 9 fo r

Uni t 4 , an dwere performe di n accordanc e wit hComprehensiv e Performanc e Tes t Plan s approve db y U.S
. EP A Regio n 5.Th e HW C MACT , a t 4 0 CF R§ 63.1207(d) , state s "The date of commencement

of the initial comprehensive performance test is the basis for

establishing the deadline to commence the initial confirmatory performance test and the next comprehensive performance test. You may conduct performance testing at any time prior

to the required

date. The deadline for commencing subsequent confirmatory and

comprehensive performance testing is based on the date of commencement

of the previous comprehensive performance test." EP A Regio n 5 consider s tha

t th e star t o f the subsequent

CPT s b e base do n th e initiatio n o f th e metal s test s performe di n 2008 , requirin g tha t th e subsequent

CP T b e starte db y September 5 , 2013 , an dtha

t asite-specifi c tes t

pla n b e submitte dbefor e thi s date
. Veoli aoriginall y submitte dto EP A it s notificatio n o f

intent an dsite-specifi c tes t

plan s (i.e. , comprehensiv e performanc e tes t plans ) fo r al l thre e unit s an daQualit y Assuranc e Projec t Pla n (QAPjP ) fo r

the subsequen

t CP T o n September

5 , 2012
. Revision s to the CP T Plan s an dQAPj Pwer e made base do n negotiation s wit h E P ARegio n 5
. Th e CP T Pla n an dQAPj Pdate dSeptember 25 , 201 3 were approve db y EP A Regio n 5
. EP ARegio n 5 consider s tha t testin g o f

the thre e incinerator s comprise s th e CP T fo r Veolia' s facilit y i n Sauget
. Veoli aSauge t starte dth e CP T o f

th e thre e incinerator s a t the Sauget facilit y o n September

4 , 201 3 wit hth e performanc e o f th e RAT Ao f

the C O an d0 2

### continuou s monitorin g system s (CEMS ) o f Uni t 4
. Th e RAT Ao f

th e C O an d0 2

### CEM S o f Uni t 3 wa s performe do n September 5 , 2013 , an dthe RAT Ao f th e C O an d0 2

### CEM S o f Uni t 2 wa s performe do n September 6 , 2013
. Testin g fo r

th e applicabl e parameter s o f the HW C MAC T includin g dioxins/furans , tota l hydrocarbon s (THC) , carbo n monoxid e (CO) , particulat e matter 1- 1(PM) , hydroge n chloride/chlorin e gas (HCI/CI2) , mercury , SVM , an dLV M wa s complete do n

Octobe r 30 , 2012
. I n accordanc e wit h4 0 CF R§63.1207(j)(l)(i ) an d§63.1207(j)(3) , th e Notificatio n o f

Complianc e (NOC ) an dCP T Report ar e bein g file dwithi n 9 0 day s o f completio n o f th e CPT
. Pe r 4 0 CF R§63.1206(b)(7)(i)(A) , complianc e wit hth e DR Estandardi s require dto b e demonstrate donl y one time , an dVeoli aSauget demonstrate dDR Edurin g RCR ATria l Burn s o f Unit s 2 , 3 , an d4 performe di n January 1993 , Novembe r 1996 , an dDecembe r

1995 , respectively
. Th e HW C MAC T require s tha t DR Eonl y b e demonstrate don e tim e as lon g as "yo u d o no t fee d hazardou s waste a

t alocatio n i n th e combustio n syste mother than the norma l flam e zone " (§63.1207(c)(2)(iv))
. Veoli adi dno t re-demonstrate DR Ei n the subsequent CPT
. DRE , an dthe associate dOPLs , were demonstrate ddurin g th e January 1993 , Novembe r 1996 , an dDecembe r 199 5 RCR ATria l Burns , respectivel y fo r Unit s 2 , 3 , an d4 , an doperation s o f th e incinerator s hav e no t significantl y change dsinc e tha t test . Thi s tes t (i.e. , th e subsequent

CPT ) demonstrate dapplicabl e emissio n standard s an d establishe dOPL s as require db y th e HW C MAC T fo r dioxins/furans , THC , CO , PM , HCI/CI2 , mercury , SVM , an dLVM
. Th e result s o f thi s ar e use dt o revis e the NO C fo r the thre e incinerators
. 1. 1 Incinerato r Overvie w Unit s 2 an d3 ar

e identica l fixe dheart

hincineratio n system s wit hprimary an dsecondar y combustio n chamber s tha t trea t soli dwaste s a

s wel l a s aqueou s an dorgani c liquids
. Th e processe s ar

e monitore dan dcontrolle db y individua l distribute dcontro l system s (DCS ) capabl e o f continuousl y monitorin g the processe s to assur e al l operational parameter s ar e withi n regulatory an dpermi t

hmit s whil e wast

e i s bein g fe dto the unit
. I n addition , Unit s 2 an d3 ar e equippe dwit haContinuou s Emission s Monitorin g Syste m(CEMS ) tha t continuousl y sample s th e exhaus t

gase s fo r

carbo n monoxid e andoxyge n i n the stac k ga s exhaus t

stream . Uni t 4 i s arotar

y kil nincineratio n syste mwit hprimar y an dsecondar y combustio n chamber s tha

t treat s soli dwaste s as wel l a s aqueou s an dorgani c liquids
. Th e proces s i s monitore dan dcontrolle db y aDC S capabl e o f continuousl y monitorin g the proces s t o assur e al l operationa l parameter s ar e withi n regulatory an dpermi t limit s whil e wast

e i s bein g fe dto the unit
. I n addition , thi s incinerato r i s equippe dwit haCEM S tha t continuousl y sample s th e exhaus t gase s fo r

carbo n monoxid e andoxyge n i n th e stac k gas exhaus t

stream .

1- 2

### 1.2 Tes t Objective s Thi s subsequent

CP T fo r th e Fina l Replacemen t

Standard s o f

th e HW C MAC T wa s designe dan dconducte dto demonstrate complianc e wit hth e standard s an dassociate dOPL s o f th e HW C MAC T fo r

existin g incinerator s a

t §63.1219
. Th e CPT :

• Demonstrate dtha

t th e incinerator s mee t

th e applicabl e HW C MAC T emissio n limit s whil e treatin g hazardou s waste ; an d

• Re-establishe doperatin g parameter limit s (OPLs ) o n ke y operatin g variable s tha t wil l ensur

e tha t th e incinerato r

operate s withi n the HW C MAC T emissio n limit s whil e treatin g hazardou s waste . Th e tes t programinclude dfeedin g liqui dan dsoli dwaste material s to the incinerators , samphn g an danalyzin g the feedstreams , spikin g wast e feedstream s wit hmetal s an dchlorine , monitorin g certai n proces s parameters , conductin g emission s testing , an d samplin g o f

wast e stream s an dspikin g materials
. Applicabl e emission s standard s under the HW C MAC T regulation s demonstrate ddurin g th e CP T ar e summarize di n Tabl e 1-1
. Tabl e 1-1 . Applicabl e HW C MAC TEmissio n Standard s Emission s Paramete

r Limit Citatio n Dioxins/Furan s (TE Q basis ) < 0.2 0 ng/dscm- Unit s 2 & 3 < 0.40 ng/dscm- Uni t

4 40CFR63.1219(a)(l)(i)(A ) 40CFR63.1219(a)(l)(i)(B ) Mercury < 13 0 ug/dscm 40 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(2) Semivolatil e Metal s (SVM ) (Cadmiuman d Lead) < 23 0 ug/dscm 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(3 ) Lo w Volatil e Metal s (LVM ) (Arsenic , Berylliu man

dChromium

) < 9 2 ug/dscm 40 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(4) Carbo n Monoxid e (CO ) < 10 0 ppmv , dr

y 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(5)(i) Total Hydrocarbon s (THC ) < 1 0 ppmv , dr y 40 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(5)(ii ) Hydroge n Chlorid e & Chlorin e (HC1/C1 2 ) < 3 2 ppm

v dry , a s C r 40 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(6) Particulat e Matte r (PM ) < 0.01 3 gr/dsc f 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(7 ) Destructio n an

dRemova l Efficienc y (DRE ) > 99.9 9 % 40 CF R§ 63.1219(c)(1 ) Note : Al l emissio n concentration s ar e correctedt

o 7 % oxygen .



### 1-3Th e objective s fo r th e subsequent

CP T fo r th e Fina l Replacemen t Standard s o f

th e HW C MAC T fo r

eac ho f th e thre e incinerator s were to :

• Demonstrate complianc e wit hstac k ga s emission s les s than o r equa l to the followin g limits , correcte dto 7 % O2 :

—Carbo n Monoxide : 100 ppmv , dry ;

—Tota l Hydrocarbons : 1 0 ppmv , dry ;

—Dioxins/Furans : 0.2 0 n g TEQ/dsc mfo r Unit s 2 an d3 , an d0.4 0 n g TEQ/dsc mfo r Uni t 4 ;

—Particulat e Matte r

(PM) : 0.01 3 grains/dscf ;

—Mercury : 13 0 |i.g/dscm ;

—Semivolatil e Metal s (SVM ) (C dan dP b combined) : 23 0 ix g /dscm ;

—Lo w Volatilit y Metal s (LVM ) (As , B e an dC r combined) : 9 2 (i, g /dscm ; an d

—Hydroge n Chloride/Chlorin e (HCI/CI2) : 3 2 ppm v a s C T equivalent , dry
.
• Complianc e wit hthe DR Estandard(99.99 % DRE ) i s demonstrate dusin g dat afro m previou s RCR Atria l burns
.
• Establis hlimit s fo r operatin g parameters .
• Conduc t

aContinuou s Monitorin g Syste m(CMS ) performanc e evaluatio n test .
• Conduc t

aRelativ e Accurac y Tes t Audi t (RATA ) fo r

th e C O an d0 2Continuou s Emission s Monitorin g System s (CEMS
. 1. 3 Tes t Protoco l Summar y Adefinitio n o f

the applicabl e emissio n limit s an dth e resultin g operatin g parameter limit s (OPLs ) are give n i n Sectio n 4. 0 o f the CP T plan s fo r

eac hincinerator
. Th e subsequent CP T o f eac ho f th e incinerator s include done tes t condition , an dth e tes t conditio n include done mod e o f operation
. On e se

t o f OPL s wa s develope dfo r eac hincinerator
. I n th e firs t

par t o f th e tes t fo r eac hincinerator , Veoli ademonstrate dcomplianc e wit hth e particulat e matter

standardo f

th e HW C MAC T whil e th e plan t wa s operate dto establis hth e maximu mas hfeedrat e an dmaximu mcombustio n ga s flowrat e OPL s as require db y the HW C MAC T fo r

the particulat e matter

standard
. Complianc e wit hthe standardfo r carbo n monoxid e wa s als o demonstrate ddurin g thi s portio n o f th e test . I n th e secon dpar

t o f the tes t fo r eac hincinerator , Veoli ademonstrate dcompliance , an d develope dOPLs , wit hthe HC1/C1 2 , dioxins/furans , THC , CO , LVM , SVM , an dmercury standard s o f

the HW C MAC T whil e th e plan t wa s operate dto establis hmaximu mtota l hazardou s waste feedrate , maximu mpumpabl e hazardou s waste feedrate , minimu mprimar y combustio n chamber

(PCC ) temperature , minimu msecondary combustio n chamber (SCC ) temperature , maximu mLVM , SVM , an dH g feedrates , maximu mchlorin e feedrate , maximu m

1- 4combustio n ga s flowrate , an dmaximu minle t temperature to th e baghouse
. As hwa s fe dto th e incinerator s a

t norma l (or

higher ) level s durin g thi s portio n o f th e test . Complianc e wit hth e standardfo r

carbo n monoxid e wa s als o demonstrate ddurin g thi s tes t Sample s o f

the waste s fe ddurin g the test s wer e sample devery 1 5 minute s an d composite dfo r

analysis
. Wast e fee dsample s were collecte di n coordinatio n wit hth e PM , HCI/CI2 , metals , an ddioxins/furan s stac k testing
. Composit e liqui dwaste fee dsample s associate dwit heac ho f th e fou r samplin g train s wer e analyze dfo r ash , total chlorine , hea

t content , moisture , density , an dviscosity
. Th e composite liqui dwast e fee dsample s collecte ddurin g the Metho d2 9 stac k

samplin g fro mthe secon dpar t o f th e tes t were als o analyze dfo r metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , an dmercury)
. Al l o f the composit e soli dwast e fee d samples , containerize dan dbulk , fro mthe firs t an dsecon dpart s o f

the tes t were analyze dfo r

total chlorine , ash , moisture , an dhea t content . Th e composit e containerize dwaste fee dsample s fo r Unit s 2 , 3 , an d4 , an dbul k

soli dwast

e fee dsample s fro mUni t 4 , collecte ddurin g the Metho d2 9 stac k samplin g fro mthe secon dpar t o f th e test were als o analyze dfo r metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , an dmercury)
. Th e incinerator s were operate dfo r 3 0 minute s a

t the desire dfeedrate s an doperatin g condition s befor e samplin g bega n fo r agive n conditio n o f

the testin g to assur

e al l operatin g parameter s were stabilize da t the desire dsetting s to achiev e stead y state . Spikin g wit hchromium , lead , mercury , an dchlorin e wa s initiate da t leas t 3 0 minute s befor e beginnin g samplin g i n th e secon dpart

o f eac htes t

ru n fo r HCI/CI2 , metals , an ddioxins/furan s to assur e tha t feedrate s o f spikin g material s ha dstabilize dbefor e samplin g began
. Spikin g o f the waste fee dwit h chromium , lead , mercury , an dchlorin e continue dthroug hth e completio n o f th e stac k

samplin g fo r dioxins/furans , the las t samplin g to b e completed
. Chlorin e an dthe metal s lead , chromiu man dmercur y wer e spike dint o eac ho f th e thre e incinerator s during , an dthroughout , the secon dpart o f eac htes t

run . Th e LV M categor

y fo r incinerator s include s arsenic , berylliu man dchromium
. Chromiu mwa s spike da s asolutio n o f chromi c aci dint o the PC C o f th e respectiv e incinerators
. Th e SV M categor y fo r incinerator s include s cadmiu man dlead
. Lea dwa s spike das soli dlea dnitrate fe dto the incinerator s i n pre measure dplasti c baggie s a t regula r interval s wit hth e containerize dsoli dwaste . Mercur y i s the onl y hig hvolatilit y metal o f the HW C MACT
. Mercur y wa s spike da s amercuri c nitrate solution , an dwa s fe di n vial s fe dto the incinerato r a t regular interval s wit hthe containerize dsoli dwaste . Th e concentratio n o f

the solutio n o f

mercuri c nitrate wa s differen t (higher) fo r

Uni t 4 tha n fo r Unit s 2 an d3
. On e via l containin g 1 0 mL s o f the mercuri c nitrate solutio n wa s fe dper charg e o f

the containerize dsoli dwast e to Unit s 2 an d3 , an done via l containin g 2 0 mL s were fe dwit heac h charg e o f

th e containerize dsoli dwaste s to Uni t 4
. 4 0 CF R§63.1207(g)(1)(A ) require s feedin g norma l (or higher ) level s o f

chlorin e durin g th

e test fo r dioxins/furans
. Chlorin e wa s spike dth e secon dpar

t o f the tes t an dthroughout

the dioxins/furan s testin g t

o provid e aconsisten

t feedrate o f

chlorin e throughout

th e dioxins/furan s 1- 5

### sampling
. Th e averag e feedrate o f chlorin e fo r

Uni t 2 fro mDecembe r

201 2 throug hMa y 201 3 wa s 3 5 lb/hr ; the averag e feedrate o f chlorin e fo r

Uni t 3 fro mDecembe r

201 2 throug hMa y 201 3 wa s 3 1 lb/hr ; an dth e averag e feedrate o f chlorin e fo r

Uni t 4 fro mDecembe r

201 2 throug hMa y 201 3 wa s 8 2 lb/hr
. Th e spikin g rat e o f chlorin e wa s abou

t 20 0 lbs/h r

fo r al l thre e incinerators
. Pursuant to 4 0 CF R§63.1209(m)(3) , Veoli ai s establishin g amaximu mas hfeedrate durin g th e CP T fo r

eac ho f th e thre e incinerators , develope di n associatio n wit hthe samphn g o f the stack ga s fo r particulat e matter . Th e desire das hfeedrate wa s achieve da s the ashfe dto th e incinerato r wit hthe wastes , primaril y soli dwastes . Th e requirement i n 4 0 CF R§63.120 7 (g) (1)(B ) fo r feedin g norma l (or

higher ) level s o f

as hdurin g the SV M an dLV M performanc e test s wa s achieve db y the feedin g o f

soli dwastes . Th e averag e solid s feedrate o f as hi n th e firs t

par t o f the tes t wa s 503. 0 lbs/h r fo r Uni t 2 , 525. 8 lbs/h r

fo r Uni t 3 , an d4,777. 2 lbs/h r

fo r Uni t 4
. Th e feedin g o f

soli d waste s continue dthroughou t the secon dpar

t o f th e tes t a t rate s simila r

to thos e i n th e firs t

par t o f th e test . Th e averag e feedrate o f as hfo r Uni t 2 fro mDecembe r

201 2 throug hMa y 201 3 wa s 102 lb/hr ; the averag e feedrate o f ashfo r Uni t 3 fro mDecembe r

201 2 throug hMa y 201 3 wa s 109 lb/hr ; an dthe averag e feedrate o f as hfo r Uni t 4 fro mDecembe r

201 2 throug hMa y 201 3 wa s 94 9 lb/hr
. 4 0 CF R63.1207(g)(l)(i)(C ) require s tha t test s fo r PM , SVM , LVM , mercury , an d dioxins/furan s includ e anorma l cleanin g cycl e o f the P M contro l device
. Fo r eac ho f th e thre e units , the baghous e i s th e uni t o f th e ai r pollutio n contro l trai n tha t i s designe dan doperate dto contro l particulat e matter . Testin g i n al l thre e run s fo r PM , SVM , LVM , mercury , an d dioxins/furan s wa s performe dincludin g acleanin g cycl e o f th e fabri c filte r

(i.e. , baghouse)
. Pe r 4 0 CF R§63.1206(b)(7)(i)(A ) complianc e wit hth e DR Estandardi s require dto b e demonstrate donl y on e tim e an dVeoli ademonstrate dDR Efo r eac ho f th e three incinerator s i n RCR Atria l burns
. Th e RCR Atria l burn fo r Uni t 2 wa s conducte di n Januar y 1993 , an dth e RCR Atria l bur n fo r

Uni t 3 wa s conducte di n Novembe r 1996
. Th e RCR Atria l bur n fo r Uni t 4 wa s conducte di n Decembe r 1995
. Veoli adi dno t

re-demonstrate DR Ei n the subsequent CP T fo r th e Fina l Replacemen t

Standard s o f

the HW C MAC T becaus e DRE , an dthe associate dOPLs , wer e demonstrate ddurin g th e RCR Atria l burns , an doperation s o f th e incinerator s hav e no t significantl y change dsinc e thos e tests . Th e operatin g limit s associate dwit hthe standardfo r D R Efo r Uni t 2 are :

• Maximu mTota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrate 3,107 lb/hr ;
• Maximu mTota l Wast e Feedrate 4,01 7 lb/hr ;
• Minimu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e 15,60 5 acfm ;
• Minimu mTemperature i n th e Primar y Combustio n Chambe r 1,658°F ; an d

• Minimu mTemperature i n th e Secondary Combustio n Chambe r 1,848°F
.

1-6Th e operatin g limit s associate dwit hthe standardfo r DR Efo r

Uni t 3 are :

• Maximu mTota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrate 4,04 5 lb/hr ;
• Maximu mTota l Wast e Feedrate 5,09 8 lb/hr ;
• Minimu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e 16,06 1 acfm ;
• Minimu mTemperature i n the Primar y Combustio n Chambe r 1,627°F ; an d

• Minimu mTemperature i n the Secondary Combustio n Chambe r 1,845°F
. Th e operatin g limit s associate dwit hthe standardfo r DR Efo r

Uni t 4 are :

Maximu mTota l Wast e Feedrate to th e SC C Maximu mTota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrate to th e Kil n Maximu mTota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrate to th e SC C Maximu mTota l Wast e Feedrate to th e Kil n Minimu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e 3,31 2 lb/hr ; 1,78 8 lb/hr ; 18,66 7 lb/hr ; 1,78 8 lb/hr ; 44,90 0 acfm ;
• Minimu mTemperature i n the Primar y Combustio n Chambe r 1,415°F ; an d

• Minimu mTemperature i n the Secondary Combustio n Chambe r 1,798°F
. Th e OPL s associate dwit heac ho f th e applicabl e emissio n standard s (i.e. , PM , HCI/CI 2 gas , metals , an ddioxins/furans ) were develope dusin g proces s dat ataken durin g the collectio n o f th e applicabl e samplin g trai n (i.e. , EP AMetho d5 fo r particulat e matter , Modifie dEP A Metho d26 Afo r

HC1/C1 2 , EP AMetho d2 9 fo r metals , an dSW-84 6 Metho d0023 A fo r dioxins/furans)
. Operatin g parameter datawere use das show n i n Tabl e 1-2 to develo p HW C MAC T OPLs
. TH C i s typicall y monitore di n CPT s durin g the measuremen t o f DRE
. Th e OPL s fo r TH C (i.e. , minimu mcombustio n chamber temperature i n th e primar y combustio n chamber , minimu mcombustio n chamber temperature i n th e secondar y combustio n chamber , maximu m flu e ga s flowrate , maximu mpumpabl e hazardou s wast e feedrate , an dmaximu mtota l waste feedrate ) ar

e th e sam

e as th e OPL s fo r

DR Ean ddioxins/furans
. Eve n thoug hDR Ewa s no t demonstrated , TH C wa s measure ddurin g th e secon dpar t o f eac htes t

ru n o f the CP T fo r

eac h unit
.

1- 7

### Tabl e 1-2 . Dat a Use d to Establis h OPL s

Demonstrate d OPL s Emissio n Standar d OPL s Developed Durin g th

e CP T Demonstrate d OPL s Emissio n Standar d Uni t2 Uni t3 Uni t4
Maximu mPumpabl e Wast e Feedrat e D R E 199 3 199 6 199 5 Maximu mPumpabl e Wast e Feedrat e TH C y y V

Pumpabl Feedrat Dioxins/Furan s •/ V Maximu mTota l Wast e Feedrat e D R E 199 3 199 6 199 5 Maximu mTota l Wast e Feedrat e T H C •/ •/ Maximu mTota l Wast e Feedrat e Dioxins/Furan s •/ V

Maximu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e S V M y •/ •/

Maximu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e L V M y Maximu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e P M y V •/ Maximu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e HC1/C1 2 y •/ Maximu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e D R E 199 3 199 6 199 5 Maximu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e T H C V • </ Maximu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e
Dioxins/Furan s •/ V Minimu mCombustio n Chambe r Temperatur e i n th e PC C D R E 199 3 199 6 199 5 Minimu mCombustio n Chambe r Temperatur e i n th e PC C T H C • / Minimu mCombustio n Chambe r Temperatur e i n th e PC C Dioxins/Furan s y •/ Minimu mCombustio n Chambe r Temperatur e i n th e SC C D R E 199 3 199 6 199 5 Minimu mCombustio n Chambe r Temperatur e i n th e SC C TH C • / •/ Combustio Temperatur Dioxins/Furan s •/ •/ Maximu mTota l Feedrat e o f LV M (As , Be , Cr ) L V M y •/ •/ Maximu mPumpabl e Feedrat e o f LV M (As , Be , Cr ) L V M •/ •/ Maximu mFeedrat e o f SV M (Pb , Cd ) S V M y V Maximu mFeedrat e o f Mercur y (Hg ) H g y •/ y Maximu mFeedrat e o f As h P M y •/ y Maximu mFeedrat e o f Tota l Chlorine/Chlorid e HC1/C1 2 y •/ y Maximu mFeedrat e o f Tota l Chlorine/Chlorid e L V M y y Feedrat e o f

Tota l Chlorine/Chlorid e S V M y y
Maximu mBaghous e Inle t Temperatur e T H C y •/ y Maximu mBaghous e Inle t Temperatur e Dioxins/Furan s y y Maximu mBaghous e Inle t Temperatur e L V M y y Maximu mBaghous e Inle t Temperatur e S V M y •/ y Minimu mCarbo n Feedrat e Dioxins/Furan s N A N A y Minimu mCarbo n Feedrat e H g N A N A y Minimu mSorben t

Feedrat e Hcyci 2 y • y Minimu mCarrie r

Flui dFlowrat e Hcyci 2 y 199 3 - Operatin g dat afro mth e Januar y 199 3 RCR ATria l Bur n fo r Uni t 2
. 199 6 - Operatin g dat afromth e Novembe r 199 6 RCR ATria l Bur n fo r Uni t 3
. 199 5 - Operatin g dat afromth e Decembe r 199 5 RCR ATria l Bu mfo r Uni t 4
.



### 1- 8

### 1.4 CP TSchedul e

Th e subsequent

CP T o f th e thre e incinerator s a t th e Sauge t

facilit y began wit hth e performanc e o f

RA T As
. Th e RAT Ao f the C O an d0 2

### continuou s monitorin g system s (CEMS ) o f Uni t 4 wa s performe do n September 4 , 2013
. Th e RAT Ao f th e C O an d0 2

### CEM S o f Uni t 3 wa s performe do n September 5 , 2013 , an dthe RAT Ao f th e C O an d0 2

### CEM S o f Uni t 2 wa s performe do n September 6 , 2013
. Th e CP T wit htestin g fo r dioxins/furans , THC , CO , PM , HCL/C1 2

### gas , mercury , SVM , an dLV M wa s conducte di n Octobe r 2013
. Th e CP T testin g fo r eac ho f th e thre e incinerator s wa s observe db y staf

f fro mth e Illinoi s Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y (IEPA)
. Du e to the federa l governmen t

shutdow n i n the earlie r stage s o f

Octobe r 2013 , staf

f fro mEP ARegio n 5 observe d th e CP T testin g onl y o f Uni t 4 , th e las t

uni t tested
. Th e subsequent

CP T o f Uni t 2 wa s begu n Octobe r

8 , 2013
. Ru n 1 o f

the tes t wa s successfull y complete do n thi s day
. Ru n 2 wa s performe do n Octobe r 9 , 2013
. Th e firs t

part o f Ru n2 wa s successfull y completed
. Durin g the secon dpar t o f Ru n2 , th e TH C monito r faile dan d drifte dwel l beyon dthe emissio n limi t o f th e HW C MAC T fo r

THC
. I t wa s recognize dtha

t the TH C monito r

use dto demonstrate complianc e wit hth e HW C MAC T ha dmalfunctione dbecaus e Veoli amonitor s stac k

gase s fo r

THC , an dth e concentratio n o f TH C monitore db y Veoli aha d no t increased
. Th e secon dpar t o f Ru n2 wa s stoppe dfo r thi s reason . Th e TH C monito r wa s replace dan dRu n 3 wa s performe do n Octobe r 10 , 2013
. Wit hth e successfu l completio n o f Ru n 3 , thre e run s fo r

P M ha dbee n successfull y completed
. Th e thir dru n o f th e secon dpar

t o f th e tes t o f Uni t 2 (i.e. , Ru n 4 ) wa s performe do n Octobe r 11 , 2013
. A t

th e completio n o f

Ru n4 , th e leakchec k o f th e pito t tube s o f th e dioxins/furan s samplin g trai n di dno t mee t the ful l requirement s o f th e applicabl e EP Ates t metho d(i.e. , EP AMetho d2 ) althoug hi t wa s considere dtha

t th e leak

chec k o f th e pito t tube s wa s acceptable
. Becaus e i t wa s fel t tha t th e result s o f

the dioxins/furan s samplin g trai n were acceptable , thi s ru n o f th e CP T o f

Uni t 2 wa s no t

re-done
. Personne l fro m EP ARegio n 5 declare dtha t th e dioxins/furan s samplin g trai n wa s unacceptabl e whe n on-sit e th e wee k o f Octobe r 21 , 2013
. Anothe r

ru n o f th e secon dpar

t o f th e test , fo r

HC1/C1 2 

### , metals , an d dioxins/furans , (i.e. , Ru n 5 ) wa s performe do n Octobe r 30 , 2013
. Th e subsequent

CP T o f Uni t 3 wa s begu n Octobe r

15 , 2013
. Th e firs t

par t o f Ru n 1 , fo r PM , wa s successfull y complete do n thi s day
. However , th e isokineti c samplin g rate o f the dioxins/furan s samplin g trai n di dno t meet metho dacceptanc e criteria , an dthe secon dpart

o f thi s run , fo r

HC1/C1 2 

### , metals , an ddioxins/furans , ha dt o b e repeate da s Ru n 4
. Ru n 2 wa s performe do n Octobe r 16 , 2013 , an dRu n 3 wa s performe do n Octobe r 17 , 2013
. Th e thir dsuccessfu l ru n o f th e secon dpart

o f the tes t o f Uni t 3 (i.e. , Ru n 4 ) wa s performe do n Octobe r

18 , 2013
.

1- 9

### Th e subsequent CP T o f Uni t 4 wa s begu n Octobe r

23 , 201 3 wit hth e successfu l completio n o f

Ru n1
. Ru n 2 wa s performe do n Octobe r 24 , 2013
. Th e glas s nozzl e o f th e P M samplin g trai n wa s chippe dwit hth e withdrawa l o f th e samplin g prob e fro mthe stac k a t th e completio n o f

th e run . Althoug hth e samplin g trai n me t al l acceptanc e criteria , includin g th e fina l leak-check , th e secon dru n fo r P M wa s repeated
. Ru n 3 wa s performe do n Octobe r 25 , 2013
. Th e thir d(accepted ) ru n fo r P M (i.e. , Ru n 4 ) wa s performe da t the conclusio n o f

Ru n3 fo r

PM
. Incinerato r

operatin g condition s require dfo r th e P M testin g were maintaine dthroug hbot ho f thes e tes t

runs . 1.5 Summar y o

f Result s Veoli asuccessfull y demonstrate dcomplianc e wit hal l o f th e applicabl e regulatory requirement s o f

th e HW C MAC T fo r

Uni t 2 , Uni t 3 , an dUni t

4 usin g the result s fro mth e singl e tes t conditio n o f

eac hunit
. Tabl e 1-

3 summarize s the result s o f th e emission s testin g o f Uni t 2
. Tabl e 1- 4 summarize s the result s o f th e emission s testin g o f Uni t 3 , an dTabl e 1-

5 summarize s the result s o f

th e emission s testin g o f Uni t 4
. Th e tes t

fo r eac huni t

consiste do f

thre e reporte d run s fo r eac hparameter

o f interest
. Th e ter m"tes t condition " refer s t o th e su mo f al l th e testin g activitie s designe dt

o demonstrate the operatio n o f th e waste incinerato r

under particular operatin g parameter s (e.g. , developmen t o f operatin g parameter

limits ) under

th e HW C MACT
. Th e term"tes t

run " refer s t o the replicat e testin g periods
. A complet e definitio n o f the tes t protoco l an dmethodolog y i s define di n th e CP T Pla n an dQAPjP
. 1.6 Repor t Organizatio n Th e remainde r

o f thi s repor

t present s th e followin g sections :

• Sectio n 2. 0 - Proces s Operations ;
• Sectio n 3. 0 - Sampling , Analysis , an dMonitorin g Procedures ;
• Sectio n 4. 0 - Results ; an d

• Sectio n 5. 0 - Qualit y Assurance/Qualit y Control
. Th e appendice s provid e ra w data , includin g chain-of-custod y forms , samplin g dat asheet s an dlogs , laborator y reports , proces s data , CM S PE T sheets , spikin g reports , an dsamplin g equipmen t

calibratio n forms
.

1-1 0

### Tabl e 1-3 . Uni t 2 Complianc e Summar y Uni t2 Paramete r HW C MAC T Limi t Run l 10-8-1 3 Ru n 2

10-9-1 3 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 Ru n 5

10-30-1 3 Averag e Particulat e Matte r

- EP A Metho d5 0.01 3 gr/dsc f correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 <0.0008 7 <0.0006 8 <0.0005 8 <0.0007 1 HC1/C1 2- Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A 3 2 ppm v dry , as CI" , correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 <2 9 <1 3 <1 8 <2 0 Metal s - EP A Metho d2 9 L V M 9 2 (xg/dsc mcorrecte dt o 7 % 0 2 <2. 8 <2. 4 <2. 5 <2. 6 S V M 23 0 [xg/dsc mcorrecte dto 7 % 0 2 <1. 1 <0.7 8 <1. 0 <0.9 5 Mercur y 13 0 ng/dsc mcorrecte dt o 7 % 0 2 <9 0 <12 0 <9 5 <10 0 Dioxins/Furan s - SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A 0.2 0 ng/dsc mcorrecte dt o 7 % 0 2 0.0054 3 0.0062 4 0.015 7 0.0091 2 Tota l Hydrocarbon s (THC ) - EP A Metho d25 A 1 0 ppmv , dr y correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 1. 6 0.1 8 0.4 9 0.7 5 Carbo n Monoxid e (CO) 1 10 0 ppmv , dr y correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.1 5 0.0 5

1 TH C an dC O result s collecte ddurin g th e stac k samplin g fo r

dioxins/furans
.



### 1-1 1

### Tabl e 1-4. Uni t 3 Complianc e Summar y Uni t3 Paramete r HW C MAC T Limi t Run l 10-15-1 3 Ru n 2

10-16-1 3 Ru n 3

10-17-1 3 Ru n 4

10-18-1 3 Averag e Particulat e Matte r

- EP A Metho d5 0.01 3 gr/dsc f correcte dto 7 % 0 2 0.0019 4 0.0020 2 0.0020 4 0.0020 0 HC1/C1 2- Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A 3 2 ppm v dry , as CI" , correcte dto 7 % 0 2 <4. 5 <4. 4 <1. 8 <3. 6 Metal s - EP A Metho d2 9 L V M 9 2 (xg/dsc mcorrecte dt o 7 % 0 2 <8. 6 <8. 9 <1 1 <9. 4 S V M 23 0 (xg/dsc mcorrecte dt o 7 % 0 2 <2 0 <1 4 <1 2 <1 5 Mercur y 13 0 (xg/dsc mcorrecte dt o 7 % 0 2 <5 9 <3 9 <4 6 <4 8 Dioxins/Furan s - SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A 0.2 0 ng/dsc mcorrecte dt o 7 % 0 2 0.0010 3 0.0011 5 0.0013 4 0.0011 8 Tota l Hydrocarbon s (THC ) - EP A Metho d25 A 1 0 ppmv , dr y correcte dto 7 % 0 2 0.4 4 0.2 6 0.5 7 0.4 3 Carbo n Monoxid e (CO) 1 10 0 ppmv , dr y correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0

1 TH C an dC O result s collecte ddurin g th e stac k samplin g fo r

dioxins/furans
.



### 1-1 2

### Tabl e 1-5 . Uni t 4 Complianc e Summar y Uni t4 Paramete r HW C MAC T Limi t Run l 10-23-1 3 Ru n 2

10-24-1 3 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 Ru n 4

10-25-1 3 Averag e Particulat e Matte r

- EP A Metho d5 0.01 3 gr/dsc f correcte dto 7 % 0 2 0.0026 9 0.0018 3 <0.001 9 <0.002 1 HCI/CI 2 - Modifie dEP A Metho d26A 3 2 ppm v dry , a s CI" , correcte dto 7 % 0 2 <1 1 <8. 0 <2 3 <1 4 Metal s - EP A Metho d2 9 L V M 9 2 [ig/dsc mcorrecte dt o 7 % 0 2 <1 2 <9. 8 <7. 5 <9. 7 S V M 23 0 |xg/dsc mcorrecte dt o 7 % 0 2 <8. 6 <4. 5 <1 0 <7. 8 Mercur y 13 0 [ig/dsc mcorrecte dt o 7 % 0 2 <7. 1 <8. 1 <1 5 <1 0 Dioxins/Furan s - SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A 0.4 0 ng/dsc mcorrecte dt o 7 % 0 2 0.13 8 0.13 2 0.13 9 0.13 7 Tota l Hydrocarbon s (THC ) - EP A Metho d25 A 1 0 ppmv , dr y correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 0.5 1 0.6 0 0.8 5 0.6 5 Carbo n Monoxid e (CO) 1 10 0 ppmv , dr y correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 0.0 7 0.0 6 0.0 8 0.0 7

1 TH C an dC O result s collecte ddurin g th e stac k samplin g fo r

dioxins/furans
.



### 1-1 3

### 2. 0 Proces s Operation s

Thi s sectio n present s brie f description s o f

th e thre e incinerator s a

t Veolia' s facilit y i n Sauget , IL , an dproces s an dfeedrate result s fro mth e CPT s o f the thre e incinerators
. 2. 1 Proces s Overvie w Veoli aoperate s tw o Fixe dHearthDua l Chambere dincinerator s (Unit s 2 an d3 ) an don e rotary kil nincinerato r

(Uni t 4 ) a t th e Sauget , I Lfacility
. Th e tw o fixe dheart hunit s ar

e rate da t 1 6 millio nBtu/h r

each
. Uni t

3 i s amirro r

imag e o f

Uni t 2
. Bot ho f

thes e unit s hav e thei r

ow n waste handlin g systems . Unit s 2 an d3 feature atwo-stag e combustio n process . Ignitio n o f wast e materia l take s plac e i n th e primar y (lower ) combustio n chamber (PCC)
. A secondar

y (upper ) combustio n chamber (SCC ) serve s a

s a n "afterburner " fo r

proces s gases . Liqui dwastes , organi c an daqueous , an dsoli dwaste s ar

e fe dto the PCC
. Air-atomizin g injector s ar e use dfo r

injectio n o f

high-Bt u liquids , low-Bt u liquid s an dspecialty fee dliquids
. Solids , usuall y package di n plasti c o r fiberboar d containers , ar

e introduce dint o the incinerato r throug haPL C controlle dairlock-ra msyste mlocate d a t the lowe r

fron t o f the PCC
. Th e ai r pollutio n contro l system s o f Unit s 2 an d3 consis t

o f aspray dryer

absorber an d fabri c filte r

baghous e modules
. Th e ai r pollutio n contro l systemneutralize s acidi c compound s an d remove s particulate matte r fro mth e exhaus t

gas . Tw o subsystems , the spra y dryer absorbe r an dth e fabri c filter , carry ou

t the chemica l neutralizatio n an dparticulate remova l functions , respectively
. A ninduce ddraf

t fa n an dstack

provid e th e mechanica l energ y require dto transpor t the flu e ga s tliroug hth e interconnectin g ductwork , to it s eventua l discharg e poin t to atmosphere
. Th e onl y differenc e between Unit s 2 an d3 i s tha t Uni t 2 i s equippe dwit hfou r (4 ) baghous e modules , whil e Uni t 3 i s equippe dwit hthre e (3 ) baghous e modules
. However , eac hincinerato r i s operate d identicall y wit honl y thre e baghous e module s i n servic e durin g operation
. Acomplete descriptio n o f Unit s 2 an d3 i s provide di n the CP T Plan
. A proces s flo w diagramfo r

Uni t 2 i s presente di n Figur e 2-1 , an daproces s flo w diagramfo r Uni t 3 i s presente di n Figur e 2-2
.

2- 1

### Uni t 4 i s rate da

t 5 0 millio nBtu/h r

an di s equippe dwit hit s ow n tank far msystem , dru m storage , bul k

solid s storag e an dfee dsystems . Uni t 4 include s arotar

y kil nas th

e PCC , an daSCC
. Liquid s ar

e fe dto eithe

r the kil nPC C o r

the SCC
. Bul k

soli dwaste s ar

e fe dto the kil nthroug hthe ra mfeeder
. Containerize dwaste s ar e fe dto the kil nthroug hthe ra mfeede r o r the auxiliar y ra m feeder
. Th e liqui dwast

e injector s use di n th e combustio n chamber s ar e air-atomizin g injectors , an d ar e use dfo r

injectio n o f

pumpabl e sludges , aqueou s waste s an dorgani c liqui dwaste s to the kil n an dfo r injectio n o f

organi c liqui dwast

e to the SCC
. Th e ai r pollutio n contro l syste mconsist s o f atemperin g chamber , tw o spra y dryer absorbers , an dfabri c filte r baghous e module s wit hcarbo n injection
. Th e ai r pollutio n contro l syste mneutralize s acidi c compound s an dremove s particulat e fro mthe exhaus t gas . Tw o subsystems , th e spra

y dryer absorber an dthe fabri c filter , carry out the chemica l neutralizatio n an d particulat e remova l functions , respectively
. A ninduce ddraf t fa n an dstac k

provid e the mechanica l energ y require dto transpor t the flu e gas throug hthe interconnectin g ductwork , to it s eventual discharg e poin t

to atmosphere
. Acomplet e descriptio n o f Uni t 4 i s provide di n the Comprehensiv e Performanc e Tes t Plan
. Aproces s flo w diagramfo r Uni t 4 i s presente di n Figur e 2-3
.

2- 2

### Figure 2-1 . Uni t 2 Proces s FlowDiagra m

TAN KFAR M DIREC T INJEC T HIG H

BT U UOOID S

SOLID S Mil l

lI I II •I. U T T COMBUSTIO N AI R BLOWE R

-UNBEJW

C AI R

iOQOOOO*- | "

TAN KFAR M f t LO W

8T U DIREC T INJEC T UQUIO S 

### X X rrr r TTTT , -SECONOAR T

AI R INCINERATO R LOWE R CHAMBE R

LIQUID CONTAINERS ^ G A S CYLINDERS .

PRIMAR Y FUE L SPECIALT Y

FEEDE R EMEROCHC Y STAC K LIM E

PREPARATIO N SYSTEM :

INCINERATO R UPPE R CHAMBE R
(Bute ] 

### p 1 \ MAI NSTACK -



### f STAC KOA S ANALYZER S •
SPRA Y DR Y ABSORBE R BAGHOUS E

laUKKOTURH W 

### T l 1.0 . FA N

V € T AS H DUMPSTE R II i i DR YSCRUBBE R

SOUD S ( DS S ) EN D DUM P DR YSCRUBBE R

SOLID S ( DS S ) EN D DUM P

ocooooJOOOO* - FUELS/UQUI D WAST E FLO W

COMBUSTIO N At R FLO W STAC KCA S FLO W AS H FLO W SOLI D WAST E FLO W LIM E SLURR YFLO W



### 2- 3

### Figure 2-2 . Uni t 3 Proces s Flo wDiagra m

TAN KFAR M Mil l Mil l 

### JJ.1 11
. DIREC T INJEC T

SOLID S -SECONDAR Y

toOOOOOH

TAN KFAR M DIREC T INJEC T LO W

8T U LIQUID S 

### rrr r T T T T

### y T INCINERATO R LOV.t R CHAMBE R EMERGENCY STAC K LIM E

PREPARATIO N SYSTE M 

### X. MAI NSTACK -

STAC K CA S AJiAlrZEK S •

INCINERATO R UPPE R CHAMBE R


### f f

WE T AS H OUMPSTE R SPRA Y DR Y A8S0R8E R BAGHOUS E 1.0 . FA N

SPECIALT YFEEDE R FUM E HOO D EMISSIO NCONTRO L SYSTE M PRIMAR Y FUE L OR YSCRUBBE R SOLID S ( DS S ) EN D DUM P DR YSCRUBBE R

ISOUD S ( OS S ) EN D DUM P 

### U

GLOV EBO X EMISSIO NCONTROL ( SYSTE M 

### caxxx> - iOCOO* - FUAS/UQUI D WAST EFLO W

COMBUSTIO NAI RFLO W STAC K OA S FLO W A S HFLO W SOU D WAST E FLO W U M ESLURR Y FLO W



### 2- 4

### Figure 2-3 . Uni t 4 Proces s Flo wDiagra m

TAN KFARM ^ DIREC T INJEC T

SOLID S

MAI N AUX . BULK . 

### |ooooocn»iPTAN KFAR M x LO W

B T U DIREC T INJEC T t LIQUID S SUR5 C 

### VEN T

KIL N D R YSCRUBBE R SOLID S { OS S ) EN D DUM P EMERGENC Y STACK

SECONDAR Y COMBUSTIO N CHAMBE R TEMPERIN G

CHAMBE R

PRIMAR Y FUE L 

## 2 A S H ROLL-OF F
COMBUSTIO N ATR BLOWER S SPRA Y D R Y ABSORBE R

LIM E PREPARATIO N SYSTE M 

# T
SPRA Y D R Y ABSORBE R
WE T AS H O R YAS H OUMPSTE R DUMPSTE R D R YSCRUBBE R SOLID S ( OS S ) E N D DUM P O R YSCRUBBE R SOLID S ( DS S ) EN D OUM P

6AGH0US E M A WSTACK -

CARBO N INJECTIO N SYSTE M

BAGHOUS E STAC KCA S ANALYZERS
I.D . FA N

O R YSCRUBBE R SO'JC S ( DS S ) EN D DUM P



### QXCD3-

- SOOOO* " FUaSAJOW O WAST EFLO W

COMBUSTIO NAI RaO W STAC K GA S FLO W A S H FLO W SOU 0 WASTE " FLO W LIM ESLURR Y FLO W



### 2- 52. 2 Proces s Operatin g Dat a an d Wast e Feedrate s

Proces s parameter s tha t were monitore dan drecorde ddurin g the tes t b y Veolia , an d feedrate s tha

t resul t fro mthe combinatio n o f waste feedrate s wit hth e respectiv e wast e fee d analyses , ar

e presente di n thi s section
. Proces s datarecorde db y Veoli aevery 1 5 second s ar e use dto creat e one-minut e average s (OMAs)
. Th e DC S calculate s hourl y rollin g average s (HRAs ) fo r applicabl e parameter s usin g the OM Afro mthe firs t minut e an dth e OMA s fro mpreviou s 5 9 minute s o f

data
. Th e raw datafro mVeolia' s DC S ar e provide di n Appendi x C
. 2.2. 1 Uni t 2 Proces s dat aan dwast

e an dparameter

feedrate s hav e bee n determine dan dar e presente dfo r th e tim e period s ove r

the collectio n o f

the stac k

ga s samplin g train s fo r particulat e matter

(EP A Metho d5) , HC1/C1 2(Modifie dEP A Metho d26A) , metal s (EP A Metho d29) , an ddioxins/furan s (SW-84 6 Metho d0023A ) an dTH C (EP A Metho d25A)
. Tabl e 2- 1 present s proces s dat asummarie s an dwaste feedrate s durin g th e particulat e matter (PM ) stac k

gas samplin g o f

the firs t part o f eac htes t

ru n fo r Uni t 2
. Tabl e 2- 2 present s proces s dat asummarie s an dwaste feedrate s durin g th e HCI/CI 2 stac k ga s samplin g o f

th e secon dpar

t o f eac htes t

ru n fo r Uni t 2
. Tabl e 2- 3 present s proces s dat asummarie s an dwaste feedrate s durin g th e metal s stac k ga s samplin g o f

the secon dpar

t o f eac htes t

ru n fo r Uni t 2
. Tabl e 2- 4 present s proces s dat asummarie s an dwaste feedrate s durin g th e dioxins/furan s an dTH C stac k

ga s samplin g an dmonitorin g o f the secon dpar

t o f eac htes t

ru n fo r Uni t 2
. 2.2. 2 Uni t 3 Tabl e 2- 5 present s proces s dat asummarie s an dwaste feedrate s durin g th e P M stac k gas samplin g o f

th e firs t par t o f eac htes t

ru n fo r Uni t 3
. Tabl e 2- 6 present s proces s dat asummarie s an dwaste feedrate s durin g th e HCI/CI 2 stac k ga s samplin g o f

the secon dpar

t o f eac htes t

ru n fo r Uni t 3
. Tabl e 2- 7 present s proces s dat asummarie s an dwaste feedrate s durin g th e metal s stac k gas samplin g o f

the secon dpar

t o f eac htes t

ru n fo r Uni t 3
. Tabl e 2- 8 present s proces s dat asummarie s an dwaste feedrate s durin g th e dioxins/furan s an dTH C stac k

ga s samplin g an dmonitorin g o f the secon dpar

t o f eac htes t

ru n fo r Uni t 3
.

2- 62.2. 3 Uni t 4

Tabl e 2- 9 present s proces s dat asurnmarie s an dwaste feedrate s durin g th e P M stac k gas samplin g o f

the firs t par t o f eac htes t

ru n fo r Uni t 4
. Tabl e 2-1 0 present s proces s dat asummarie s an dwaste feedrate s durin g the HCI/CI 2 stac k ga s samplin g o f

th e secon dpar

t o f eac htes t

ru n fo r Uni t 4
. Tabl e 2-1 1 present s proces s dat asummarie s an dwaste feedrate s durin g the metal s stac k ga s samplin g o f

the secon dpar

t o f eac htes t

ru n fo r Uni t 4
. Tabl e 2-1 2 present s proces s dat asummarie s an dwaste feedrate s durin g th e dioxins/furan s an dTH C stac k

ga s samplin g an dmonitorin g o f th e secon dpar

t o f eac htes t

ru n fo r Uni t 4
. 2. 3 Spikin g o f Metal s an d Chlorin e Durin g th e tes t

o f eac hincinerator , th e metal s chromium , lead , an dmercur y were spike dint o the incinerator
. Th e spikin g wa s performe db y Veolia
. Detail s concernin g the spikin g o f metal s an d chlorin e are presente di n Appendi x B
. Th e spikin g rate s o f

chlorin e durin g the HCI/CI 2 stac k samplin g o f

th e secon dpar

t o f eac h ru n ar e presente di n Tabl e 2-1 3 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 2-1 4 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d2-1 5 fo r

Uni t 4
. Th e spikin g rate s o f

chromium , lead , mercury , an dchlorin e durin g th e metal s stac k samplin g o f

the secon dpar

t o f eac hru n ar

e presente di n Tabl e 2-1 6 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 2-1 7 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d2-1 8 fo r

Uni t 4
. Th e spikin g solution s o f chromiu m(chromic acid ) an dmercur y (mercuri c nitrate ) were sample da

t the beginning , a

t port change , an da

t th e en do f

th e EP A Metho d2 9 stac k samplin g fo r metal s o f

eac hrun , an deac ho f

thes e sample s were analyze dfo r chromiu mo r

mercury , respectively
. Th e analytica l result s fo r chromi c aci dan dmercuri c nitrate solution s ar e presente di n Table s 2-1 9 an d2-2 0 fo r Uni t 2 , Table s 2-2 1 an d2-2 2 fo r Uni t 3 , an dTable s 2-2 3 an d2-2 4 fo r Uni t 4
.

2- 7

### Tabl e 2-1 . Uni t 2 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 

### an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M
Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-8-1 3 11:50-13:0 0 Ru n 2 10 - 9-1 3 09:45 -10:5 3 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 09:1 5 -10:2 3 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e ACF M H R A 15,01 5 14,95 5 14,87 6 15,52 9 15,43 0 15,32 4 15,69 0 15,37 4 15,24 0 15,41 2 15,25 3 15,14 7 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,947. 7 1,277. 2 899. 3 1,948. 6 1,353. 3 749. 5 2850. 8 1288. 3 299. 8 2,249. 0 1,306. 3 649. 5 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,009. 9 1,000. 2 982. 6 1,142. 2 997. 7 792. 3 1008. 4 998. 5 985. 5 1,053. 5 998. 8 920. 1 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 351. 7 270. 8 190. 5 424. 9 256. 5 131. 9 468. 9 296. 7 161. 2 415. 1 274. 6 161. 2 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 734. 9 738. 4 746. 0 739. 8 As h Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 501. 6 513. 2 494. 2 503. 0 P C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,73 5 1,70 8 1,64 0 1,73 3 1,69 1 1,65 0 1,75 9 1,69 8 1,63 8 1,74 2 1,69 9 1,64 3 S C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,89 4 1,88 0 1,86 7 1,89 3 1,88 0 1,86 9 1,90 0 1,88 2 1,87 0 1,89 6 1,88 1 1,86 9 CO , Correcte dto 7 % 0 2 ppmv d O M A 0.0 0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 Baghous e Inle t

Temperature 2 ° F O M A 44 0 42 0 39 6 44 4 42 0 40 0 43 8 42 1 39 3 44 1 42 0 39 6 Proces s dat aare th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g ru n fo r particulat e matter

i n stack
.

2Measure da s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature
. Note : Value s i n bol duse dt o develo p OPL
.



### 2- 8

### Tabl e 2-2 . Uni t 2 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 

### an d Feedrate s Durin g th e Modifie d EP A Metho d 26A Stac k Samplin g fo r HCI/CI 2 Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -16:4 0 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30 -13:3 0 Ru n 5 10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -13:4 5 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m H R A 15,41 0 15,27 8 15,14 2 15,85 4 15,65 2 15,31 0 15,40 7 15,22 5 15,03 8 15,55 7 15,38 5 15,16 3 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 2,546. 4 1,422. 1 299. 8 2,246. 8 1,500. 9 899. 6 2,321. 8 1,451. 9 374. 9 2371. 6 1458. 3 524. 8 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,424. 2 1,370. 8 1,191. 0 1,129. 5 1,098. 7 1,051. 6 1,226. 6 1,200. 0 1,163. 7 1260. 1 1223. 1 1135. 5 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Feedrat e Ib/h r O M A 586. 1 485. 9 410. 3 527. 5 398. 2 307. 7 615. 4 440. 8 263. 7 576. 3 441. 6 327. 2 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 Ib/h r 884. 8 902. 0 880. 4 889. 0 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e Ib/h r 208. 0 207. 5 202. 8 206. 1 Sorben tFeedrat e lb/l b Cl 2 H R A 2.3 2 2.1 8 2.2 1 2.2 4 Carrie rFlui d Flowrat e gal/l b Cl 2 H R A 1.9 3 1.8 5 1.9 2 1.9 0 P C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,77 2 1,70 7 1,64 8 1,81 3 1,72 1 1,63 1 1,75 3 1,70 3 1,60 8 1,77 9 1,71 0 1,62 9 S C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,95 8 1,89 1 1,86 6 1,91 0 1,87 8 1,86 5 1,89 7 1,88 2 1,87 2 1,92 2 1,88 4 1,86 8 C O , Correcte dt o 1%0 2 ppmv d O M A 0.0 0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.6

6 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2

2 0.0

3 0.0

0 Baghous e Inle t

Temperature 3 ° F O M A 44 7 42 1 39 2 43 9 41 8 39 9 43 9 41 9 39 4 44 1 42 0 39 5 Proces s dat aar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g ru n fo r HC1/C1 2i n stack
.

2Containerize dWast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane , lea dnitrate , an dmercuri c nitrat e solution
.

3 Measure da s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature
. Note : Value s i n bol duse dt o develo p OPL
.



### 2- 9

### Tabl e 2-3 . Uni t 2 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 

### an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 2 9 Stac k Samplin g fo r Metal s
Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -18:4 3 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30 -15:1 0 Ru n 5 10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -15:3 2 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m H R A 15,60 2 15,37 5 14,94 6 15,85 4 15,48 7 15,12 6 15,63 6 15,43 8 15,03 8 15,69 7 15,43 3 15,03 7 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e Ib/h r O M A 2,546. 4 1,474. 6 299. 8 2,246. 8 1,513. 3 899. 6 2,547. 3 1,396. 5 0. 9 2,446. 8 1,461. 5 400. 1 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,424. 2 1,289. 1 1,191. 0 1,129. 5 1,098. 9 1,051. 6 1,226. 6 1,164. 6 973. 4 1,260. 1 1,184. 2 1,072. 0 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 615. 4 432. 6 0. 0 586. 1 425. 4 307. 7 732. 6 445. 3 234. 4 644. 7 434. 4 180. 7 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h r 895. 0 883. 1 891. 2 889. 8 S V M Feedrat e lb/h r 61. 9 61. 7 62. 0 61. 9 L V M Feedrat e - Tota l lb/h r 45. 8 47. 3 45. 9 46. 3 L V M Feedrate - Pumpabl e Ib/h r 45. 9 47. 3 45. 9 46. 3 Mercur y Feedrat e lb/h r 0.0020 5 0.0020 6 0.0022 4 0.0021 2 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrate lb/h r 209. 6 203. 6 205. 1 206. 1 Baghous e InletTemperature 3 ° F O M A 44 7 42 0 39 2 43 9 41 9 39 9 43 9 41 9 39 4 44 1 42 0 39 5 P C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,77 2 1,70 1 1,62 2 1,82 1 1,70 8 1,60 7 1,79 8 1,70 5 1,60 8 1,79 7 1,70 5 1,61 2 S C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,95 8 1,87 5 1,71 4 1,96 2 1,88 6 1,86 5 1,89 7 1,88 2 1,85 7 1,93 9 1,88 1 1,81 2 CO , Correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d O M A 0.0 0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 1 .25 0.1 3 0.0 0 0.4

2 0.0

4 0.0

0

1 Proces s dat aare th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g ru n fo r Metal s i n stack
.

2Containerize dWast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane , lea dnitrate , an dmercuri c nitrat e solution
.

3 Measure da s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature
. Note : Value s i n bol duse dt o develo p OPL
.



### 2-1 0

### Tabl e 2-4 . Uni t 2 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 

### an d Feedrate s Durin g th e SW-846 Metho d 0023 A Stac k Samplin g fo r Dioxins/Furan s
Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -18:5 5 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30 -15:4 0 Ru n 5 Octobe r30,201 3 12:4 5 -16:0 2 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e ACF M H R A 15,60 2 15,34 5 14,86 2 15,85 4 15,46 2 15,12 6 15,63 6 15,41 6 15,03 8 15,69 7 15,40 8 15,00 9 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 2546. 4 1470. 7 299. 8 2,246. 8 1,510. 2 899. 6 254 7 138 3 1 2,446. 8 1,454. 7 400. 1 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1424. 2 1286. 7 1191. 0 1,129. 5 1,099. 2 1,051. 6 122 7 114 0 97 3 1,260. 1 1,175. 2 1,072. 0 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 615. 4 429. 8 0. 0 586. 1 425. 5 307. 7 73 3 44 5 23 4 644. 7 433. 6 180. 7 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h r 897. 9 867. 4 874. 1 879. 8 Tota l Waste Feedrate 3 lb/h r H R A 4,473. 4 4,317. 4 4 ,060. 4 4,369. 4 4,110. 4 2,944.5 4,446. 7 4,119. 3 3,707. 4 4,429. 8 4,182. 4 3,570. 8 Tota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrate 3 lb/h r H R A 3,564. 8 3,429. 5 3,241. 7 3,469. 0 3,276. 5 2,507.5 3,519. 5 3,267. 4 2,930. 6 3,517. 8 3,324. 5 2,893. 3 P C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,77 2 1,70 1 1,62 2 1,82 1 1,70 7 1,59 4 1,79 8 1,70 1 1,60 8 1,79 7 1,70 3 1,60 8 SC C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,95 8 1,87 5 1,71 4 1,96 2 1,88 4 1,86 5 1,89 9 1,88 3 1,85 7 1,94 0 1,88 1 1,81 2 Baghous e Inle tTemperature 4 ° F O M A 44 7 42 0 39 2 43 9 41 9 39 9 43 9 41 9 39 4 44 1 42 0 39 5 CO , Correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d O M A 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 1.6 2 0.1 5 0.0 0 0.5 4 0.0 5 0.0 0

1 Proces s dat aare th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samphn g ru n fo r Dioxins/Furan s i n stack
.

2Containerize dWast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane , lea dnitrate , an dmercuri c nitrat e solution
.

3 Tota l Wast e Feedrat e an dTota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrate , maximum , average , an dminimum , include s th e averag e chromi c aci dsolutio n feedrate
.

4Measure da s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature
. Note : Value s i n bol duse dt o develo p OPL
.



### 2-1 1

### Tabl e 2-5 . Uni t 3 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 

### an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M
Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-15-1 3 13:1 6 -14:2 5 Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 11:1 5 -12:2 5 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 09:50 -10:5 7 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e ACF M H R A 15,24 5 15,16 7 15,14 9 15,40 7 15,27 9 15,17 3 15,27 8 15,06 4 14,90 1 15,31 0 15,17 0 15,07 4 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,636. 3 1,292. 9 890. 5 1,635. 2 955. 4 368. 1 2,007. 3 1,357. 6 367. 9 1,759. 6 1,202. 0 542. 2 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 861. 1 847. 9 833. 4 887. 5 818. 2 742. 2 933. 0 875. 3 810. 1 893. 8 847. 1 795. 2 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 395. 6 307. 9 131. 9 381. 0 269. 1 190. 5 791. 2 457. 4 263. 7 522. 6 344. 8 195. 4 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 738. 3 742. 1 720. 7 733. 7 As h Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 499. 9 510. 9 566. 5 525. 8 P C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,76 6 1,70 7 1,65 0 1,72 6 1,704 1,68 4 1,74 2 1,70 4 1,61 4 1,74 4 1,70 5 1,64 9 S C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,89 9 1,89 0 1,88 3 1,89 5 1,88 5 1,87 8 1,90 2 1,88 5 1,86 3 1,89 9 1,88 7 1,87 5 CO , Correcte dt o 7 % O z ppmv d O M A 0.0 0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 Baghous e Inle t

Temperature 2 ° F O M A 43 1 42 0 40 7 43 1 42 1 40 1 43 4 42 0 40 2 43 2 42 0 40 3

1 Proces s dat aare th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g ru n fo r particulat e matter

i n stack
.

2Measure da s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperatur e Note : Value s i n bol duse dt o develo p OP L



### 2-1 2

### Tabl e 2-6 . Uni t 3 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 

### an d Feedrate s Durin g th e Modifie d EP A Metho d 26A Stac k Samplin g fo r HCI/CI 2
Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 14:0 0 -15:0 0 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:30 -13:3 3 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:35 -10:3 5 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m H R A 15,54 7 15,39 5 15,08 8 15,36 0 15,20 4 14,84 0 15,22 8 15,19 3 15,11 6 15,37 8 15,26 4 15,01 5 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 2,530. 5 1,783. 5 442. 9 2,008. 4 1,563. 4 0. 0 2,231. 4 1,725. 3 1,261. 8 2,256. 8 1,690. 7 568. 2 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,053. 0 977. 2 926. 8 1,212. 3 1,151. 9 1,039. 1 1,263. 1 1,163. 5 1,003. 3 1,176. 1 1,097. 6 989. 7 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 380. 9 177. 5 87. 9 556. 8 407. 7 322. 3 410. 3 248. 8 146. 5 449. 3 278. 0 185. 6 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h r 904. 4 893. 8 861. 3 886. 5 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/h r 207. 0 206. 0 201. 0 204. 7 Sorben tFeedrat e lb/l b Cl 2 H R A 2.1 3 1.9 9 2.1 3 2.0 9 Carrie rFlui d Flowrat e gal/l b Cl 2 H R A 1.8 6 1.7 8 1.8 8 1.8 4 P C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,74 6 1,70 9 1,67 5 1,77 0 1,71 5 1,69 1 1,74 3 1,71 9 1,69 4 1,75 3 1,71 4 1,68 6 S C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,90 9 1,88 7 1,86 7 1,93 1 1,88 4 1,84 2 1,92 3 1,88 1 1,86 4 1,92 1 1,88 4 1,85 8 CO , Correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d O M A 0.0 0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 Baghous e Inle t

Temperature 3 ° F O M A 43 0 42 0 39 5 43 3 42 0 38 0 42 9 41 5 38 5 43 1 41 8 38 6

1 Proces s dat aar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g ru n fo r HCI/CI 2 i n stack
.

2Containerize dWast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane , lea dnitrate , an dmercuri c nitrat e solution
.

3 Measure da s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature
. Note : Value s i n bol duse dt o develo p OPL
.



### 2-1 3

### Tabl e 2-7 . Uni t 3 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 

### an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 29 Stac k Samplin g fo r Metal s
Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 14:0 0 -16:5 0 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:30 -15:2 5 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:35 -12:2 0 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m H R A 15,54 7 15,27 4 15,08 8 15,42 9 15,23 0 14,84 0 15,27 7 15,13 3 14,98 3 15,41 7 15,21 2 14,97 0 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 2,531. 2 1,787. 6 442. 9 2,157. 8 1,685. 3 0. 0 2,231. 4 1,707. 4 1,261. 8 2,306. 8 1,726. 8 568. 2 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,114. 5 1,043. 9 926. 8 1,212. 3 1,166. 5 1,039. 1 1,263. 1 1,197. 7 1,001. 3 1,196. 6 1,136. 0 989. 1 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 410. 3 202. 9 0. 0 556. 8 350. 0 0. 0 410. 3 244. 8 146. 5 459. 1 265. 9 48. 8 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb /h r 890. 9 888. 0 873. 6 884. 2 S V M Feedrat e lb/h r 62. 1 62. 5 62. 2 62. 3 L V M Feedrat e - Tota l lb/h r 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 46. 1 L V M Feedrat e - Pumpabl e lb/h r 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 46. 0 Mercur y Feedrat e lb/h r 0.0022 1 0.0021 4 0.0022 7 0.0022 1 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/h r 204. 2 204. 6 203. 7 204. 2 Baghous e Inle tTemperature 3 ° F O M A 43 0 41 9 39 5 43 3 42 0 38 0 43 6 42 1 38 5 43 3 42 0 38 6 P C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,75 2 1,71 0 1,67 5 1,77 0 1,70 7 1,65 7 1,74 3 1,70 8 1,61 0 1,75 5 1,70 8 1,64 7 S C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,90 9 1,88 5 1,86 7 1,93 1 1,88 5 1,84 2 1,92 3 1,88 6 1,86 4 1,92 1 1,88 5 1,85 8 CO , Correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d O M A 0.0 0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0

1 Proces s dat aare th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samphn g ru n fo r Metal s i n stack
.

2Containerize dWast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane , lea dnitrate , an dmercuri c nitrat e solution
.

3 Measure da s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature
. Note : Value s i n bol duse dt o develo p OPL
.



### 2-1 4

### Tabl e 2-8 . Uni t 3 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 

### an d Feedrate s Durin g th e SW-846 Metho d 0023 A Stac k Samplin g fo r Dioxins/Furan s
Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ru n 2 10-161-1 3 14:0 0 -17:2 0 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:30 -15:5 5 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:35 -12:5 0 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e ACF M H R A 15,54 7 15,24 8 15,08 8 15,42 9 15,21 9 14,84 0 15,27 7 15,12 5 14,98 3 15,41 7 15,19 7 14,97 0 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 2,531. 2 1,806. 5 442. 9 2,157. 8 1,688. 0 0. 0 2,231. 4 1,718. 8 1,261. 8 2,306. 8 1,737. 7 568. 2 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,114. 5 1,052. 3 926. 8 1,212. 3 1,167. 4 1,039. 1 1,263. 1 1,188. 4 805. 7 1,196. 6 1,136. 0 923. 9 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 410. 3 199. 6 0. 0 556. 8 340. 4 0. 0 410. 3 246. 2 146. 5 459. 1 262. 1 48. 8 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h r 887. 2 870. 5 872. 5 876. 7 Tota l Wast e Feedrate 3 lb/h r H R A 4,288. 0 4,057. 1 2,491. 4 4,503. 5 4,250. 4 2,904. 3 4,437. 3 4,233. 2 3,734. 8 4,409. 6 4,180. 2 3,043. 5 Tota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrate 3 lb/h r H R A 3,412. 8 3,209. 1 2,055. 4 3,613. 3 3,410. 5 2,467. 1 3,556. 0 3,393. 0 3,238. 5 3,527. 4 3,337. 5 2,587. 0 P C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,75 2 1,70 9 1,67 5 1,77 0 1,70 7 1,65 7 1,75 7 1,71 2 1,61 0 1,76 0 1,70 9 1,64 7 SC C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,90 9 1,88 5 1,86 7 1,93 1 1,88 5 1,84 2 1,92 3 1,88 4 1,86 4 1,92 1 1,88 5 1,85 8 Baghous e InletTemperature 4 ° F O M A 43 0 41 9 39 5 43 3 42 1 38 0 43 6 42 0 38 5 43 3 42 0 38 6 CO , Correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d O M A 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0

1 Proces s dat aare th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samphn g ru n fo r Dioxins/Furan s i n stack
.

2Containerize dWast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane , lea dnitrate , an dmercuri c nitrat e solution
.

3 Tota l Wast e Feedrat e an dTota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrate , maximum , average , an dminimum , include s th e averag e chromi c aci dsolutio n feedrate
.

4Measure da s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature
. Note : Value s i n bol duse dt o develo p OPL
.



### 2-1 5

### Tabl e 2-9 . Uni t 4 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 

### an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M
Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-23-1 3 09:30 -10:4 2 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 09:35 -10:4 0 Ru n 4 10-25-1 3 10:50 -11:5 5 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e ACF M H R A 37,75 5 37,63 2 37,33 3 37,99 7 37,82 4 37,47 9 37,64 7 36,94 9 36,51 8 37,80 0 37,46 8 37,11 0 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil nFeedrat e lb/h r O M A 2,080. 6 1,899. 6 1,646. 9 2,180. 2 1,901. 0 1,730. 0 1,957. 9 1,896. 8 1,807. 7 2,072. 9 1,899. 2 1,728. 2 tligh-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil nFeedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,124. 8 1,101. 4 1,081. 3 1,403. 2 1,098. 1 1,010. 0 1,200. 5 1,108. 9 996. 8 1,242. 8 1,102. 8 1,029. 4 Liqui dWast e t o SC C Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,185. 5 1,095. 6 1,003. 0 1,158. 5 1,100. 7 1,026. 9 1,153. 8 1,102. 8 1,068. 8 1,166. 0 1,099. 7 1,032. 9 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 565. 8 568. 6 553. 8 562. 8 Bul k Solid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 6,286. 7 6,408. 0 5,992. 6 6,229. 1 As h Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 4 ,806. 0 4 ,835. 6 4,689. 9 4 ,777. 2 P C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,63 1 1,59 1 1,53 7 1,62 3 1,57 4 1,50 3 1,60 1 1,55 9 1,50 8 1,61 8 1,57 5 1,51 6 S C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,90 9 1,88 5 1,86 6 1,90 5 1,88 6 1,86 3 1,89 6 1,88 2 1,87 0 1,90 3 1,88 4 1,86 6 C O , Correcte dt o 1%0 2 ppmv d O M A 0.3 3 0.1 4 0.0

0 0.2

6 0.0

9 0.0

0 0.2 1 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2

7 0.1 0 0.0

0 Baghous e Inle t

Temperature 2 ° F O M A 40 2 39 8 39 2 40 3 39 7 39 1 40 7 40 1 39 6 40 4 39 9 39 3 Carbo n Injectio n Rat e lb/h r O M A 6. 7 6. 2 5. 9 6. 7 6. 2 5. 9 7. 0 6. 2 5. 7 6. 8 6. 2 5. 8

1 Proces s dat aar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g ru n fo r particulat e matte r

i n stack
.

2Measure das th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperatur e Note : Value s i n bol duse dt o develo p OP L



### 2-1 6

### Tabl e 2-10 . Uni t 4 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 

### an d Feedrate s Durin g th e Modifie d EP A Metho d 26A Stac k Samplin g fo r HCI/CI 2 Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-23-1 3 12:36 -13:3 6 Ru n 2 10-24-1 3 12:3 5 -13:3 5 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -14:3 5 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m H R A 38,04 2 37,93 5 37,85 7 37,26 5 37,17 0 37,06 3 36,87 2 36,75 4 36,57 2 37,39 3 37,28 6 37,16 4 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil nFeedrat e lb/h r O M A 2,105. 9 1,943. 7 0. 0 2,057. 1 1,996. 5 1,863. 0 2,068. 1 1,999. 6 1,942. 1 2,077. 0 1,980. 0 1,268. 4 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil nFeedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,224. 9 1,167. 0 0. 0 1,230. 8 1,205. 4 1,172. 2 1,294. 3 1,201. 0 1,094. 0 1,250. 0 1,191. 2 755. 4 Liqui dWast e t o SC C Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,261. 5 1,165. 6 0. 0 1,240. 6 1,203. 1 1,126. 5 1,238. 0 1,196. 3 1,171. 4 1,246. 7 1,188. 3 766. 0 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h r 860. 0 857. 0 843. 0 853. 3 Bul k Solid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h r 6,093. 0 5,448. 0 5739. 0 5,760. 0 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/h r 203. 0 203. 5 203. 2 203. 2 Sorben tFeedrate Lb/l b C l 2 H R A 2.2 3 2.0 7 2.0 7 2.1 3 Carrie rFlui d Flowrat e Gal/l b C l 2 H R A 3.1 6 3.0 7 3.0 7 3.1 0 P C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,63 5 1,58 9 1,49 3 1,62 3 1,56 9 1,50 7 1,56 7 1,51 3 1,46 0 1,60 9 1,55 7 1,48 7 S C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,90 9 1,88 3 1,80 1 1,90 1 1,88 0 1,83 8 1,90 5 1,87 8 1,84 7 1,90 5 1,88 0 1,82 8 C O , Correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d O M A 0.2 3 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2 1 0.0

6 0.0

0 0.2

7 0.0

9 0.0

0 0.2

4 0.0

8 0.0

0 Baghous e Inle t

Temperature 3 ° F O M A 40 9 39 8 38 3 40 3 39 9 39 3 40 6 40 0 39 2 40 6 39 9 38 9 Carbo n Injectio n Rat e lb/h r O M A 6. 7 6. 0 0. 0 6. 5 6. 2 6. 1 6. 7 6. 2 6. 0 6. 6 6. 1 4. 0 Proces s dat aar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samphn g ru n fo r HC1/C1 2i n stack
.

2Containerize dWast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane , lea dnitrate , an dmercuri c nitrat e solution
.

3 Measure da s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature
. Note : Value s i n bol duse dt o develo p OPL
.



### 2-1 7

### Tabl e 2-11 . Uni t 4 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 

### an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 2 9 Stac k Samplin g fo r Metal s
Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-23-1 3 12:36 -15:2 0 Ru n 2 10-24-1 3 12:35 -15:1 5 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 13:35 -16:1 1 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m H R A 38,04 2 37,65 9 37,01 0 37,26 7 37,08 7 36,86 4 38,29 7 37,19 9 36,57 2 37,86 9 37,31 5 36,81 5 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil nFeedrat e lb/h r O M A 2,105. 9 1,978. 5 0. 0 2,113. 9 1,986. 6 1,711. 7 2,072. 2 1,999. 0 1,939. 2 2,097. 3 1,988. 0 1,217. 0 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil nFeedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,232. 7 1,189. 2 0. 0 1,239. 1 1,201. 2 1,159. 0 1,340. 2 1,201. 8 1,094. 0 1,270. 7 1,197. 4 751. 0 Liqui dWast e t o SC C Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,261. 5 1,186. 2 0. 0 1,240. 6 1,201. 5 1,077. 4 1,238. 0 1,196. 2 1,167. 1 1,246. 7 1,194. 6 748. 1 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h r 862. 7 849. 0 856. 5 856. 1 Bul k Solid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h r 5,251. 5 5,598. 4 5345. 0 5,398. 3 S V M Feedrat e lb/h r 62. 2 61. 6 62. 2 62. 0 L V M Feedrat e - Tota l lb/h r 46. 2 46. 3 46. 0 46. 2 L V M Feedrat e - Pumpabl e lb/h r 46. 0 46. 0 45. 8 45. 9 Mercur y Feedrat e lb/h r 0.040 2 0.040 0 0.040 3 0.040 2 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/h r 205. 3 204. 1 205. 5 205. 0 Baghous e InletTemperature 3 ° F O M A 40 9 39 9 38 3 40 9 39 9 39 0 41 0 39 9 38 8 41 0 39 9 38 7 Carbo n Injectio n Rat e lb/h r O M A 6. 7 6. 1 0. 0 6. 7 6. 2 5. 9 6. 9 6. 2 5. 9 6. 8 6. 2 3. 9 P C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,66 6 1,58 2 1,49 3 1,62 3 1,57 1 1,50 7 1,60 2 1,52 5 1,46 0 1,63 1 1,55 9 1,48 7 S C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,92 8 1,88 5 1,80 1 1,90 1 1,87 9 1,83 8 1,91 2 1,87 9 1,83 1 1,91 4 1,88 1 1,82 3 C O , Correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d O M A 0.2 3 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2 1 0.0

6 0.0

0 0.2

7 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2

4 0.0

7 0.0

0 Proces s dat aare th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g ru n fo r metal s i n stack
.

2Containerize dWast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane , lea dnitrate , an dmercuri c nitrat e solution
.

3 Measure da s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature
. Note : Value s i n bol duse dt o develo p OPL
.



### 2-1 8

### Tabl e 2-12 . Uni t 4 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 

### an d Feedrate s Durin g th e SW-846 Metho d 0023 A Stac k Samplin g fo r Dioxins/Furan s
Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-23-1 3 12:36 -15:5 0 Ru n 2 10-24-1 3 12:35 -15:4 5 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 13:35 -16:4 1 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e ACF M H R A 38,04 2 37,54 7 36,88 1 37,26 7 37,02 8 36,45 4 38,29 7 37,32 5 36,57 2 37,86 9 37,30 0 36,63 5 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil nFeedrat e lb/h r O M A 2,105. 9 1,982. 8 0. 0 2,113. 9 1,950. 9 1,711. 7 2,072. 2 1,998. 3 1,939. 2 2,097. 3 1,977. 4 1,217. 0 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil nFeedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,232. 7 1,190. 9 0. 0 1,239. 1 1,201. 0 1,159. 0 1,340. 2 1,200. 9 1,094. 0 1,270. 7 1,197. 6 751. 0 Liqui dWast e t o SC C Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,261. 5 1,187. 5 0. 0 1,240. 6 1,201. 3 1,077. 4 1,238. 0 1,196. 9 1,167. 1 1,246. 7 1,195. 2 748. 1 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h r 862. 6 841. 6 854. 2 852. 8 Bul k Solid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h r 5,322. 4 5,090. 8 5,284. 2 5,232. 5 Tota l Waste Feedrat e t o PCC 3 lb/h r H R A 10,621. 4 9,551. 1 7,192. 1 10,662. 8 9,512. 7 7,097. 6 10,610. 4 9,407. 6 6,913. 6 10,631. 5 9,490. 5 7,067. 8 Tota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrat e t o PCC 3 lb/h r H R A 3,466. 7 3,418. 2 3,095. 1 3,465. 0 3,430. 7 3,151. 6 3,473. 2 3,447. 0 3,129. 6 3,468. 3 3,432. 0 3,125. 4 Tota l Waste Feedrat e t o SC C (Pumpable ) lb/h r H R A 1,201. 9 1,184. 2 1,078. 0 1,207. 0 1,197. 8 1,082. 2 1,199. 5 1,192. 4 1,077. 6 1,202. 8 1,191. 5 1,079. 3 P C C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,66 6 1,58 0 1,49 3 1,62 6 1,57 5 1,50 7 1,60 2 1,52 7 1,46 0 1,63 2 1,56 1 1,48 7 SC C Temperatur e ° F O M A 1,92 8 1,88 5 1,80 1 1,91 0 1,88 1 1,83 8 1,91 2 1,87 9 1,83 1 1,91 7 1,88 1 1,82 3 Baghous e InletTemperature 4 ° F O M A 41 0 40 0 38 3 40 9 39 9 39 0 41 3 39 9 38 8 41 1 39 9 38 7 Carbo n Injectio n Rat e lb/h r O M A 6. 8 6. 2 0. 0 7. 1 6. 2 5. 9 6. 9 6. 2 5. 9 6. 9 6. 2 3. 9 C O , Correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d O M A 0.2 3 0.0 7 0.0 0 0.2 1 0.0 6 0.0 0 0.2 7 0.0 8 0.0 0 0.2 4 0.0 7 0.0 0

1 Proces s dat aar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g ru n fo r Dioxins/Furan s i n stack
.

2Containerize dWast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane , lea dnitrate , an dmercuri c nitrat e solution
.

3 Tota l Wast e Feedrat e t o PC C an dTota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrat e t o PCC , maximum , average , an dminimum , includ e th e averag e chromi c aci dsolutio n feedrate
.

4Measure da s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature
. Note : Value s i n bol duse dt o develo p OPL
.



### 2-1 9Tabl e 2-13 . Uni t 2 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e HCI/CI 2 Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Ru n 1 Run 3 Ru n 5 Constituen

t Targe

t 10-8-1

3 10-10-1

3 10-30-1

3 15:4 0 -16:4 0 12:3

0 - 13:3 0 12:4

5 -13:4 5 Chlorin e 200-25 0 197. 9 203. 1 197. 9

Tabl e 2-14 . Uni t 3 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e HCI/Cl 2 Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Constituen

t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Constituen

t Targe

t Ru

n 2 10-16-1 3 14:00-15:0

0 Run 3

10-17-1 3 12:3 0 -13:3 3 Ru

n 4 10-18-1 3 09:3 5 -10:3 5 Chlorin e 200-25 0 203. 1 203. 3 197. 9

Tabl e 2-15 . Uni t 4 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e HCI/CI 2 Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Constituen

t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Constituen

t Targe

t Ru

n 1 10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -13:3 6 Run 2

10-24-1 3 12:3 5 -13:3 5 Ru

n 3 10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -14:3 5 Chlorin e 200-25 0 197. 9 197. 9 197. 9

2-2 0Tabl e 2-16 . Uni t 2 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Constituen

t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Constituen

t Targe

t Run l

10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -18:4 3 Ru

n 3 10-10-1 3 12:3 0 -15:1 0 Ru n 5 10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -15:3 2 Chromiu m 40-4 5 45. 8 47. 3 45. 8 Lead 60-6 5 61. 9 61. 7 62. 0 Mercury 0.00 1 - 0.00 3 0.0019 6 0.0019 6 0.0020 4 Chlorin e 200-25 0 199. 7 199. 2 200. 2

Tabl e 2-17 . Uni t 3 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Constituen

t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Constituen

t Targe

t Run 2

10-16-1 3 14:0 0 -16:5 0 Ru

n 3 10-17-1 3 12:3 0 -15:2 5 Ru

n 4 10-18-1 3 09:3 5 -12:2 0 Chromiu m 40-4 5 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 Lead 60-6 5 62. 1 62. 5 62. 2 Mercury 0.00 1 - 0.00 3 0.0020 4 0.00200 0.00209 Chlorin e 200-25 0 200. 3 201. 7 200. 7

Tabl e 2-18 . Uni t 4 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Run l Ru n 2 Ru

n 3 Constituen

t Targe

t 10-23-1

3 10-24-1

3 10-25-1

3 12:3 6 -15:2 0 12:3

5 -15:1 5 13:3

5 -16:1 1 Chromiu m 40-4 5 46. 0 46. 0 45. 8 Lead 60-6 5 62. 0 61. 1 62. 0 Mercury 0.02-0.0 6 0.039 3 0.038 8 0.0394 Chlorin e 200-25 0 200. 0 197. 2 200. 3

2-2 1

### Tabl e 2-19 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Chromiu m Spikin g Solutio n
Chromiu m Ru n 1 Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Chromiu m CO A

Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t CO A Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t CO A Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t Chromiu m (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) Beginnin g o f

Metho d29 Sample 178,88 1 178,000 178,87 1 178,000 178,88 1 174,000 Middl e o f

Metho d29 Sample 178,88 1 172,00 0 178,87 1 174,000 178,88 1 173,000 En do f Metho d29 Sample 178,88 1 169,000 178,87 1 178,000 178,88 1 170,000



### Tabl e 2-20 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n
Mercur y Ru n 1 Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Mercur y Calculate d Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t Calculate

d Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t Calculate

d Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t Mercur y (ug/ml ) (mg/kg

) (|jg/ml

) (mg/kg

) (Mg/ml

) (mg/kg

) Beginnin g o f

Metho d29 Sample 2,32 3 1,96 0 2,32 3 2,37 0 2,32 3 2,21 0 Middl e o f

Metho d29 Sample 2,32 3 2,05 0 2,32 3 2,15 0 2,32 3 2,120 En do f Metho d29 Sample 2,32 3 2,39 0 2,32 3 1,95 0 2,32 3 2,25 0



### 2-2 2

### Tabl e 2-21 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Chromiu m Spikin g Solutio n
Chromiu m Ru n 2 Run 3 Ru n 4 Chromiu m CO A

Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t CO A Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t CO A Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t Chromiu m (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) Beginnin g o f

Metho d29 Sample 179,13 7 176,000 179,13 7 176,00 0 179,13 7 176,00 0 Middl e o f

Metho d29 Sample 179,13 7 173,000 179,13 7 179,00 0 179,13 7 172,000 En do f Metho d29 Sample 179,13 7 177,000 179,13 7 174,00 0 179,13 7 173,000



### Tabl e 2-22 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n
Mercur y Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Run 4 Mercur y Calculate d Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t Calculate

d Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t Calculate

d Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t Mercur y (ug/ml ) (mg/kg

) (pg/ml

) (mg/kg

) (ug/ml

) (mg/kg

) Beginnin g o f

Metho d29 Sample 2,32 3 2,420 2,32 3 2,46 0 2,32 3 2,48 0 Middl e o f

Metho d29 Sample 2,32 3 2,38 0 2,32 3 2,39 0 2,32 3 2,500 En do f Metho d29 Sample 2,32 3 2,38 0 2,32 3 2,48 0 2,32 3 2,48 0



### 2-2 3

### Tabl e 2-23 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Chromiu m Spikin g Solutio n
Chromiu m Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Chromiu m CO A

Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t CO A Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t CO A Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t Chromiu m (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) Beginnin g o f

Metho d29 Sample 179,13 7 171,00 0 179,13 7 173,000 179,009 169,000 Middl e o f

Metho d29 Sample 179,13 7 175,000 179,13 7 172,000 179,009 172,000 En do f Metho d29 Sample 179,13 7 169,00 0 179,13 7 174,000 179,009 176,000



### Tabl e 2-24 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n
Mercur y Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Mercur y Calculate d Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t Calculate

d Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t Calculate

d Concentratio

n Analytica

l Resul t Mercur y (ug/ml ) (mg/kg

) (ug/ml

) (mg/kg

) (ug/ml

) (mg/kg

) Beginnin g o f

Metho d29 Sample 23,22 8 21,300 23,22 8 19,70 0 23,22 8 22,000 Middl e o f

Metho d2 9 Sample 23,22 8 18,70 0 23,22 8 19,90 0 23,22 8 21,300 En do f Metho d29 Sample 23,22 8 19,30 0 23,22 8 21,000 23,22 8 21,400



### 2-2 4

### 3. 0 Sampling , Analysis , an d Monitorin g Procedure s

Th e subsequent

CP T wa s performe da

t on e tes t conditio n o n eac ho f

the thre e incinerator s to demonstrate syste mperformanc e an dto establis happropriate operatin g parameter limit s (OPLs ) fo r

al l o f th e applicabl e standard s o f the HW C MACT
. Th e CP T include dthre e replicat e samplin g run s o n eac hincinerato r a t the on e tes t

condition
. Tabl e 3- 1 summarize s the parameter s tha t wer e measure ddurin g the tes t o f eac ho f th e thre e incinerator s an dthe frequenc y o f measurement . Th e CP T wa s conducte di n accordanc e wit hth e comprehensiv e performanc e tes t plan s fo r Unit s 2 , 3 , an d4 (i.e
. the CP T Plan ) an dQualit y Assuranc e Projec t Pla n (QAPjP ) date d September

25 , 201 3 tha

t were approve db y EP ARegio n 5
. 3. 1 Samplin g Location s an d Procedure s Sample s were collecte do f solid , liquid , an dga s stream s durin g the CPT
. Tabl e 3- 2 summarize s th e samplin g method s fo r eac hstreaman dth e parameter s tha t were detennined
. Refe r to th e QAPj Pfo r

mor e detaile ddescription s o f th e method s an dth e qualit y contro l activitie s fo r

eac hmethod
. Sectio n 5. 0 present s adiscussio n o f th e QA/Q C activitie s performe d fo r th e CPT
. 3.1. 1 Liquid s Samplin g Procedure s Sample s o f

the liqui dwaste feed s were collecte devery 1 5 minute s durin g eac ho f th e thre e run s o f

the CP T fo r

eac ho f the thre e incinerator s beginnin g a t th e star t o f stac k samplin g throug hcompletio n o f stac k samplin g fo r

bothth e firs t

an dsecon dpart s o f

the CPT
. Individua l sample s (i.e. , sub-samples ) were collecte devery 1 5 minute s throughou t th e test , an dcomposite dfo r

analysis
. Sample s o f

the liqui dwaste feed s were collecte da t 15-minute interval s durin g th e collectio n o f

the Metho d5 samplin g trai n o f the firs t par t o f eac hru n o f

the test , an ddurin g th e collectio n o f

th e Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an dMetho d0023 A samplin g train s o f the secon dpar

t o f eac hru n o f

the test . Composit e sample s were prepare do f th e sample s collecte ddurin g eac ho f th e Metho d5 , Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an dMetho d 0023 A samplin g times
. Al l o f the composit e liqui dwaste fee dsample s fro mthe firs t par t an d th e secon dpart

o f th e CP T were analyze dfo r ash , total chlorine , hea

t content , moisture , density , an dviscosity
. Th e composit e liqui dwast e fee dsample s collecteddurin g the Metho d2 9 stac k samplin g were als o analyze dfo r metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , an d mercury)
.

3- 1

### I n additio n to th e collectio n o f sub-sample s ever y 1 5 minute s o f th e liqui dwastes , individua l sample s were collecte dan darchive dfo r furthe r analysis , i f

required
. Sample s o f

the chromiu man dmercury spikin g solution s were collecte di n eac hru n o f the secon dpar

t o f the tes t o f eac hincinerator
. A t

the beginning , middl e (a t port change) , an d endo f th e Metho d2 9 samplin g o f th e secon dpar

t o f th e test , sample s o f

th e chromiu man d mercur y spikin g solution s were collected
. Th e individua l sample s o f th e chromiu man d mercur y spikin g solution s collecte ddurin g eac hMetho d2 9 samplin g ru n o f th e tes t o f eac h incinerato r

were analyze dfo r

chromiu mo r

mercury , respectively
. A fourt hsampl e o f the chromiu man dmercury spikin g solution s wa s collecte da t the completio n o f

the Metho d 0023 A samplin g train
. Thi s fourthsampl e wa s archived(i.e. , no t analyzed)
. Liqui dwaste sample s wer e collecte dupstreamo f any metal spikin g location
. Spli t sample s o f

th e composit e liqui dwaste fee dan dthe chromiu man dmercury spikin g solution s fro m on e ru n were take n b y th e Illinoi s EP Aand/o r U.S
. EP ARegio n 5
.

3- 2

### Tabl e 3-1 . Measuremen t Frequency Sampl e Frequenc

y fo r Stream/Parameter

s th e Subsequen

tCP T FirstPar t Secon

d Par t Liqui d Wast

e Fee d As h 3 3 Chlorin e ; 3 3 Moisture 3 3 Heatin g Valu e 3 3 Viscosity , Densit

y 3 3 Metal s 3 ' Soli d Wast e Fee d - Containerize

d an d Bul k(Uni t4 ) As h 3 3 Chlorin e 3 3 Moisture 3 3 Heatin g Valu e 3 3 Metal s 3 ' Spikin g Materials2 Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n 3 LeadSoli dSpikin g Material 3 ChromiumSpikin g Solutio n 3 Chlorin e Soli dSpikin g Material (i f spiked) 3 Stac k Ga s Metal s 3 1 Particulat e Matte r 3 HC1/C1 2 3 Dioxins/Furan s 3 

### co 2 

### ,0 2 Continuou s Continuous 3 Total Hydrocarbon s Continuous 3 Moisture Concurren t wit h Concurren

t wit h isokineti c samplin g isokineti c sampling CO , 

### o 2 4 Continuou s Continuou s

' Analysi s i s fo r

As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , an

dH g . 2Eac hcollecte dsampl

e o f th e mercur y an dchromiumspikin g solution s wer e analyzedfo r

th e targe t spikin g metal
. Sample s o f

th e lea dan dchlorine spikin g material s wer e archived
. 3 Allowin g fo r

hourly calibratio n o f

th e TH C monitor
. 4Plan t monitors
.



### 3- 3

### Tabl e 3-2 . Samplin g Method s Stream Samplin g Metho d Samplin g Frequenc y Compositin g Approac h Analytica l

Parameters Liqui dWast e Fee d Unit s 2 an d3 Low-Bt u High-Bt u Liqui d (Specialty ) Wast e Uni t 4 Low-Bt u t o Kil n High-Bt u to Kil n Liqui dWast e t o SC C Ta p (Metho dS004 ) Firs t part o f th e tes t conditio n - Ever y 1 5 Minute s Durin g Metho d5 samplin g Secon dpar t

o f th e tes t conditio n - Ever y 1 5 Minute s Durin g Modifie dMetho d 26A , Metho d29 , an d Metho d0023 A samplin g Subsample s fro m

eac htes t perio d composite d As h Chlorin e Moistur e Heatin g Valu e Densit y Viscosit y Metals 1

Soli dWast e Fee d Unit s 2 an d3 Containerize d Uni t 4 Containerize d Bul k Gra b o r Scoo p (Metho dS007 ) - Solid s Firs t par t o f th e tes t conditio n - Ever y 1 5 Minute s Durin g Metho d5 samplin g Secon dpar t

o f th e tes t conditio n - Ever y 1 5 Minute s Durin g Modifie dMetho d 26A , Metho d29 , an d Metho d0023 A samplin g Subsample s fro m

eac htes t perio d composite d As h Chlorin e Moistur e Heatin g Valu e Metals 1

Chromiu mSpikin g Solutio n Ta p (Metho dS004 ) Secon dpar t o f th e tes t conditio n - Beginning , middle , an den do f Metho d2 9 samplin g En do f Metho d0023 A samplin g Subsample s

collecte ddurin g Metho d2 9 samplin g analyze d Subsampl e collecte d a t en do f Metho d 0023 A samplin g archive d Chromiu m

Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n Gra b Secon dpart o f th e tes t conditio n - Beginning , middle , an den do f Metho d2 9 samplin g En do f Metho d0023 A samplin g Subsample s

collecte ddurin g Metho d2 9 samplin g analyze d Subsampl e collecte d a t en do f Metho d 0023 A samplin g archive d Mercur y



### 3- 4

### Tabl e 3-2 . (continued ) Samplin g Method s Strea m Samplin g Metho d Samplin g Frequenc y Compositin g Approac h Analytica l

Parameters

Lea dan dChlorin e Spikin g Material s Gra b Secon dpart o f th e tes t conditio n - Beginning , middle , an den do f Metho d2 9 samplin g En do f Metho d0023 A samplin g Non e - Archiv e Archiv e

Stac k Ga s E P AMetho d2 Concurren t wit h isokineti c samplin g fo r E P AMethod s 5 , 29 , an dSW-84 6 Metho d 0023 A N R Flowrat e

Stac k Ga s E P AMetho d3 A Concurren t wit h isokineti c samplin g - Firs t an dSecon dPart s o f th e Tes t N R 

### o 2 

### , co 2

Stac k Ga s E P AMetho d4 Concurren t wit h isokineti c samplin g - Firs t an dSecon dPart s o f th e Tes t N R Moistur e

Stac k Ga s E P AMetho d5 1 + hou r collecte d isokineticall y - Firs t Par t o f th e Tes t N R P M Stac k Ga s Modifie dEP AMetho d26 A 1 + hou r collecte d isokineticall y a

t singl e poin t - Secon dPar t

o f th e Tes t N R HC1/C1 2 Stac k Ga s

E P AMetho d2 9 2 + hou r collecte d isokineticall y - Secon d Par t o f th e Tes t N R Metal s 1 Stac k Ga s

SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A 3 + hou r collecte d isokineticall y - Secon d Par t o f th e Tes t N R Dioxins/Furan s Stac k Ga s

E P AMetho d25 A Concurren t wit h isokineti c samplin g - Secon dPar t

o f th e Tes t N R T H C Stac k Ga s

Plan t CEM S Continuou s N R CO , 

### o 2

1 Analysi s fo r

As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , an dH g onl y i n sample s fro mth e secon dpart o f th e tes t conditio n collecte ddurin g Metho d 2 9 stac k sampling
. N R= No t

Require d



### 3- 5

### 3.1. 2 Solid s Samplin g Procedure s Sample s o f

th e containerize dsoli dwaste fee dfe dto Unit s 2 , 3 , an d4 , an dthe bul k solid s fe dto Uni t

4 , were collecte devery 1 5 minute s durin g th e collectio n o f the Metho d5 samplin g trai n o f

th e firs t part o f eac hru n o f

the test , an ddurin g the collectio n o f the Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an dMetho d0023 A samplin g train s o f the secon dpar

t o f eac hru n o f

th e test . Composit e sample s were prepare do f th e sample s collecte ddurin g eac h o f th e Metho d5 , Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an dMetho d0023 A samplin g times
. Al l o f th e composit e soli dwaste fee dsample s fro mth e firs t par t an dthe secon dpar

t o f th e CP T wer e analyze dfo r

ash , tota l chlorine , hea

t content , an dmoisture
. Th e composite soli dwaste fee d sample s collecte ddurin g th e Metho d2 9 stac k

samplin g were als o analyze dfo r metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , an dmercury)
. I n additio n to th e collectio n o f sub-sample s every 1 5 minute s o f th e soli dwastes , individua l sample s were collecte dan darchive dfo r furthe r analysis , i f

required
. Spike s o f soli dlea dan dchlorin e were adde dto the containerize dsoli dwast e i n th e tes t

o f eac hincinerator
. Sample s o f the lea d(as lea dnitrate ) an dthe chlorin e (a s hexachloroethane ) were collecte ddurin g the Metho d2 9 stac k samplin g i n the secon dpar t o f the test . Thre e gra

b sample s o f th e chlorin e an dlea dspikin g material s wer e collecte da t the beginning , middl e (a t port change) , an dendo f

th e Metho d2 9 samplin g o f th e secon dpar

t o f th e test . A fourt hsampl e o f th e lea dan d chlorin e spikin g material s wa s collecte da t the completio n o f

th e Metho d0023 A samplin g trai n i n th e secon dpar

t o f the test . Al l sample s o f the lea dan dchlorin e spikin g material s were archive d (i.e. , no t analyzed)
. Sample s o f

th e composit e soli dwaste feed s an dth e chlorin e an dlea dspikin g solution s fro mone ru n wer e take n b y the Illinoi s EP Aand/or U.S
. EP ARegio n 5
. 3.1. 3 Stac k

Ga s Samplin g Procedure s Stac k ga s emission s were sample dfo r determinatio n o f

the parameter s indicate di n Table s 5- 1 an d5-2
. Th e stac k sample s collecte dusin g isokineti c samplin g method s wer e particulat e matter

b y EP AMetho d5 , HC l an dCl 2

### usin g aModifie dMetho d26A , metal s b y EP A Metho d29 , an ddioxins/furan s b y SW-84 6 Metho d0023A
. Tabl e 3-3 , Tabl e 3-4 , an dTabl e 3- 5 present summarie s o f

the samplin g datafo r

the isokineti c samplin g train s fo r the CP T testin g o f Uni t 2 , Uni t 3 , an dUni t

4 , respectively
.

3- 6

### Tabl e 3-3 . Uni t 2 - Summar y o f Isokineti c Samplin g

Ru n Analytica l Paramete r Dat e Tim e Averag e Stac k Temperatur e (°F ) Velocity

(ft/sec ) Flu e Ga s Moistur e (% ) 

### o 2 (vol % ) 

### co 2 (vol % ) Av g Flowrat e (acfm ) Av g

Flowrat e (dscfm) Volum e

a tMete r (dscf ) Isokineti c Samplin g Rate (% )

1 P M 10-8-1 3 11:50-13:0 0 39 0 30.5 0 41. 2 11.5 6 6.3 5 14,79 6 5,39 5 40.81 5 97. 9
1 HC1/C1 2 10-8-1 3 15:40-16:4 0 39 1 29.9 7 45. 1 10.0 8 7.9 5 14,53 7 4,94 2 37.38 4 103. 5 1 Metal s 10-8-1 3 15:40-18:4 3 38 9 31.4 1 45. 5 10.0 8 7.9 5 15,23 5 5,15 6 84.95 2 107. 1 1 Dioxins/Furan s 10-8-1 3 15:40-18:5 5 38 7 30.0 5 44. 7 10.0 8 7.9 5 14,57 8 5,01 7 121.16 4 104. 6 2 P M 10-9-1 3 09:45-10:5 3 39 0 31.0 7 41. 6 11.2 3 6.5 6 15,07 0 5,45 1 42.35 6 100. 5

3 P M
10-10-1 3 09:15-10:2 3 39 1 30.4 2 42. 0 11.4 8 6.2 8 14,75 3 5,28 7 41.27 8 101. 0
3 HC1/C1 2 10-10-1 3 12:30-13:3 0 39 6 31.9 5 45. 9 10.3 8 7.5 0 15,49 8 5,15 0 37.29 0 99. 0 3 Metal s 10-10-1 3 12:30-15:1 0 39 3 31.3 6 45. 8 10.3 8 7.5 0 15,21 2 5,08 1 78.95 1 101. 0 3 Dioxins/Furan s 10-10-1 3 12:30-15:4 0 39 6 32.0 5 45. 3 10.3 8 7.5 0 15,54 4 5,22 5 119.56 8 99. 1

5 HC1/C1 2 10-30-1 3 12:45-13:4 5 39 2 31.2 1 43. 8 10.5 0 7.2 5 15,13 8 5,22 5 36.87 9 96. 1 5 Metal s 10-30-1 3 12:45-15:3 2 38 6 31.0 6 43. 8 10.5 0 7.2 5 15,06 4 5,23 6 79.60 7 97. 9

Dioxins/Furan s 10-30-1 3 12:45-16:0 2 38 9 33.1 0 42. 9 10.5 0 7.2 5 16,05 6 5,65 0 124.92 1 95. 3



### 3- 7

### Tabl e 3-4 . Uni t 3 - Summar y o f Isokineti c Samplin g

Ru n Analytica l Paramete r Date Tim e Averag e Stack Temperatur e (°F ) Velocity

(ft/sec ) Flu e Ga s Moistur e (% ) 0 2 (vol % ) 

### co 2 (vol % ) Av g Flowrate (acfm ) Av g

Flowrat e (dscfm) Volum e

a tMete r (dscf ) Isokineti c Samplin g Rat e (% ) 1 P M 10-15-1 3 13:16-14:2 5 36 5 29.9 4 38.3 12.8 7 5.3 1 14,52 3 5,67 5 41.22 9 98. 9

2 P M 10-16-1 3 11:15-12:2 5 36 6 30.7 5 36. 2 13.3 8 4.9 6 14,91 6 6,03 4 42.46 1 96. 2
2 HC1/C1 2 10-16-1 3 14:00-15:0 0 36 8 30.9 8 41. 6 11.1 9 6.8 8 15,02 8 5,54 2 36.08 8 101. 6 2 Metal s 10-16-1 3 14:00-16:5 0 36 7 30.6 8 43. 5 11.1 9 6.8 8 14,88 2 5,31 9 71.70 8 103. 6 2
Dioxins/Furan s 10-16-1 3
14:00-17:2 0 36 7 30.9 2 42. 9 11.1 9 6.8 8 14,99 6 5,42 0 106.30 3 102. 5

3 P M
10-17-1 3 09:50-10:5 7 36 8 30.6 6 41. 0 11.7 4 6.0 2 14,87 0 5,54 9 41.92 1 103. 3
3 HC1/C1 2 10-17-1 3 12:30-13:3 3 36 6 30.3 5 43. 2 10.7 2 7.3 6 14,72 1 5,29 3 34.59 7 101. 9 3 Metal s 10-17-1 3 12:30-15:2 5 36 7 30.2 2 44. 5 10.7 2 7.3 6 14,65 8 5,15 0 69.01 6 102. 9 3 Dioxins/Furan s 10-17-1 3
12:30-15:5 5 36 7 30.7 2 44. 4 10.7 2 7.3 6 14,90 1 5,24 8 102.72 4 102. 3

4 HC1/C1 2 10-18-1 3 09:35-10:3 5 36 8 32.0 6 43. 4 10.8 7 7.2 6 15,54 9 5,57 9 35.24 1 98. 5 4 Metal s 10-18-1 3 09:35-12:2 0 36 8 31.5 2 44. 1 10.8 7 7.2 6 15,29 2 5,41 4 71.54 0 101. 5

Dioxins/Furan s 10-18-1 3 09:35-12:5 0 36 8 30.5 9 43. 7 10.8 7 7.2 6 14,83 9 5,29 0 102.62 4 101. 4



### 3- 8

### Tabl e 3-5 . Uni t 4 - Summar y o f Isokineti c Samplin g

Ru n Analytica l Paramete r Dat e Tim e Averag e Stac k Temperatur e CT ) Velocity

(ft/sec ) Flu e Ga s Moistur e (% ) 

### o 2 (vol % ) 

### co 2 (vol % ) Av g Flowrat e (acfm ) Av g

Flowrat e (dscfm) Volum e

a tMete r (dscf ) Isokineti c Samplin g Rate (% )

1 P M
10-23-1 3 09:30-10:4 2 3 7 4 57.5 5 39. 4 12.2 2 5.5 9 43,27 5 16,48 3 38.18 1 97. 9
1 HC1/C1 2 10-23-1 3 12:36-13:3 6 3 7 7 60.3 0 39. 6 12.2 7 5.8 6 45,34 5 17,15 7 39.93 5 99. 1 1 Metal s 10-23-1 3 12:36-15:2 0 37 1 57.2 6 39. 7 12.2 7 5.8 6 43,06 1 16,38 2 76.06 8 100. 1 1 Dioxins/Furan s 10-23-1 3 12:36-15:5 0 37 0 55.1 2 39. 2 12.2 7 5.8 6 41,45 5 15,91 9 110.79 1 100. 7

2 HC1/C1 2 10-24-1 3 12:35-13:3 5 37 7 57.9 1 38. 6 12.3 7 5.7 4 43,55 0 16,82 4 39.26 4 99. 3 2 Metal s 10-24-1 3 12:35-15:1 5 37 0 57.7 2 38. 6 12.3 7 5.7 4 43,41 0 16,91 7 76.49 8 97. 5

Dioxins/Furan s 10-24-1 3 12:35-15:4 5 37 0 55.3 2 38.3 12.3 7 5.7 4 41,59 8 16,28 4 112.80 3 100. 3

3 P M 10-25-1 3 09:35-10:4 0 37 2 57.3 5 38. 7 12.4 8 5.4 5 43,12 6 16,84 7 39.69 1 100. 3 3 HC1/C1 2 10-25-1 3 13:35-14:3 5 37 8 54.6 6 39.3 12.0 0 5.9 6 41,10 2 15,79 6 37.03 4 99. 8 3 Metal s 10-25-1 3 13:35-16:1 1 37 3 57.9 4 39. 8 12.0 0 5.9 6 43,57 5 16,72 3 76.84 6 99. 1 3 Dioxins/Furan s 10-25-1 3 13:35-16:4 1 37 4 56.9 5 39.3 12.0 0 5.9 6 42,82 9 16,55 0 115.28 4 100. 8 4 P M 10-25-1 3 10:50-11:5 5 37 4 54.5 2 39. 5 12.1 1 5.7 1 40,99 8 15,76 8 36.75 9 100. 5



### 3- 93.1.3. 1 Sampl e Port Locatio n Th e Uni t 2 an dUni t

3 stack s ar

e 90-fee t hig han dhav e an insid e diameter o f 3 9 inches
. Ther e ar e tw o sets o f

tw o orthogona l port s locate da t tw o slightl y differen t

levels
. Onl y th e upper se t o f orthogona l port s ar

e suitabl e for , an dwere use dfor , isokineti c sampling
. A n additiona l port locate dabout

fou r fee t belo w th e uppe r

orthogona l ports , an dabout 45 ° betwee n the orthogona l ports , wa s use dfo r the Modifie dMetho d26 A samplin g fo r HCI/CI2
. Th e numbe r

o f samplin g point s fo r

th e isokineti c samplin g b y Metho d5 , Metho d29 , an dMetho d0023 A wa s determine di n accordanc e wit hEP A Metho d1
. Th e Uni t 4 stac k i s 100-fee t

hig han dha s a

n insid e diameter

o f 4 8 inches
. Ther e ar

e fou r orthogona l port s locate da t one level
. A n additiona l port locate dabout

fou r fee t belo w the upper orthogona l ports , an dabou t 45 ° betwee n th e orthogona l ports , wa s use dfo r the Modifie dMetho d 26 A samplin g fo r

HCI/CI2
. Th e numbe r

o f samplin g point s fo r

th e isokineti c samplin g b y Metho d5 , Metho d29 , an dMetho d0023 A wa s determine di n accordanc e wit hEP A Metho d1
. 3.1.3. 2 EP A Method s 2 an d 4 (Flowrat e an d Moisture ) Concurren t

wit hthe performanc e o f the isokineti c samplin g trains , measurement s were mad e to determin e ga s velocit y b y 4 0 CF RPart 60 , Appendi x A , Metho d2 , an dmoistur e b y Metho d4
. Th e absenc e o f cycloni c flo w wa s determine db y performin g acycloni c flo w check , prescribe di n EP A Metho d2 , prio r to th e CP T testin g o f

eac hincinerator
. 3.1.3. 3 EP A Metho d 5 (PM ) Sample s fo r

th e determinatio n o f

particulat e matter

(PM ) i n stac k

emission s wer e collecte di n th e firs t

par t o f th e test s o f

eac hincinerato r

usin g EP A Metho d5
. Thi s sampl e trai n consiste do f

th e followin g components :

• Glas s (quartz ) nozzle ;
• Heated , glas s (quartz)-line dprobe ;
• Heate dfilte r

wit haTeflo n filte r

support ;
• Optiona l empty knockou t impinger ;
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit himpinge r containin g 10 0 m Lo f

D I water ;
• Greenburg-Smithimpinge r containin g 100 m Lo f

D I water ;
• Empt y Modifie dGreenburg-Smithimpinger ; an d

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit himpinge r containin g silic agel
. Th e procedure s specifie di n EP A Metho d5 protoco l were use dt o determin e particulat e matter . Thes e procedure s requir e th e isokineti c extractio n o f particulat e matter

o n afilte r

maintaine da

t a controlle dtemperature betwee n 223° Fan d273°F
. Th e particulat e mas s include s th e mas s

3-1 0determine dgravimetricall y i n th e prob e an dnozzl e rins e (PNR ) wit hacetone , afte r evaporatio n an ddesiccation , an dfilte r afte r desiccation
. 3.1.3. 4 Modifie d EP A Metho d 26 A (HCI/CI 2 ) Durin g th e secon dpart o f th e tes t o f eac hincinerator , sample s fo r the determinatio n o f HCI/CI 2 i n stac k

emission s wer e collecte dusin g amodificatio n o f EP A Metho d26 A propose d an dapprove db y EP A Regio n 5
. Thi s sampl e trai n consiste do f the followin g components :

• Glas s (quartz ) nozzle ;
• Heated , glas s (quartz)-line dprobe ;
• Heate dTeflo n ma

t filte r wit haTeflon ® filte r

support ;
• Teflon ® transfe r

line ;
• Optiona l empt

y knockou t

impinger ;
• Greenburg-Smithimpinge r containin g 10 0 m Lo f

0. 1 N H2SO4 ;
• Greenburg-Smithimpinge r containin g 10 0 m Lo f

0. 1 N H2SO4 ;
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smithimpinge r containin g 100 m Lo f

0. 1 N NaOH ;
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smithimpinge r containin g 10 0 m Lo f

0. 1 N NaOH ; an d

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smithimpinge r containin g silic agel
. Th e procedure s specifie di n EP A Metho d5 , as reference di n EP A Metho d26A , were use dfo r th e isokineti c collectio n o f th e sampl e excep t

tha t th e sampl e wa s collecte da t asingl e poin t locate da t th e center

o f the stack
. A Teflon ® unio n wa s use dto connec t th e glas s o r

quart z nozzl e to th e glas s o r

quartz prob e liner , an dth e filte r an dprob e were kep t

a t atemperature betwee n 248° Fan d273°F
. A Teflon®-backe dfilte r wa s used , a

s specifie di n EP A Metho d26A
. 3.1.3. 5 EP A Metho d 2 9 (Metals ) Sample s o f

the stac k

ga s emission s were collecte dfo r th e determinatio n o f

metal s durin g th e secon dpar

t o f th e tes t o f eac hincinerator
. Th e stac k ga s sample s were collecte d isokineticall y fo r

the HW C MAC T metal s As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , an dH g usin g Metho d2 9 fro m4 0 CF RPar t

60 , Appendi x A
. Thi s metho di s basicall y an EP A Metho d5 samplin g trai n wit hsome ver y specifi c modifications :

• Glas s nozzle ;

• Heated , glass-line dprobe ;

• Heate dfilter ;

3-1 1

### • Teflon ® transfe r line ;

• Empt y modifie dGreenburg-Smit himpinger ;

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit himpinge r containin g 100 m Lo f

5 % 

### HNO 3 an d10 % H 2 

### 0 2 

### ;

• Greenburg-Smit himpinge r containin g 10 0 m Lo f

5 % HN0 3 

### an d10 % H 2 

### 0 2 

### ;

• Empt y modifie dGreenburg-Smit himpinger ;

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit himpinge r containin g 10 0 m Lo f

4 % KMn0 4

### an d10 % H 2 

### S 0 4 

### ;

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit himpinge r containin g 100 m Lo f

4 % KMn0 4 an d10 % H 2 

### S 0 4 

### ; an d

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit himpinge r containin g silic agel
. ATeflon ® transfe r

lin e wa s use dbetwee n th e filte r an dth e firs t

impinger
. Thi s i s don e to addres s spac e limitation s o n th e stack , t o allo w fo r eas e i n prob e moving , an dto minimiz e potentia l hazard s movin g th e ver y larg e an dheav y impinge r box
. Followin g sampling , the prob e an dnozzl e o f the samplin g trai n were recovere dusin g a brus hcontainin g n o meta l usin g 0. 1 norma l nitri c acid
. 3.1.3. 6 SW-84 6 Metho d 0023 A (Dioxins/Furans ) Stac k ga s emission s were sample disokineticall y fo r dioxins/furan s i n th e secon dpar t o f th e tes t o f eac hincinerato r

usin g SW-84 6 Metho d0023A
. Th e samplin g trai n consist s o f th e followin g components :

• Glas s nozzle ;
• Heated , glass-line dprobe ;
• Heate dfilter ;
• Heate dTeflon ® transfe r line ;
• Sorben t

module ;
• Knock-ou t

impinger ;
• Greenburg-Smithimpinge r containin g 100 m Lwater ;
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smithimpinge r containin g 10 0 m Lwater ; an d

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smithimpinge r containin g silic agel
. Fro mthe heate dfilter , sampl e ga s wa s passe dthroug haheate dTeflon ® transfe r lin e befor e enterin g th e sorbent

module
. Th e sorbent

modul e consiste do f

awater-coole dcondenser an da
3-1 2

### resi n tra p containin g XAD-2 ® resin
. Th e condenser i s use dto ensure tha

t th e gas enterin g th e resi n tra p i s belo w 68°F
. Isotopically-labele ddioxins/furan s were spike dont o the XAD-2 ® resi n bothbefor e fiel d samplin g (surrogate standards ) an dint o appropriate place s i n th e preparatio n prio r t o analysi s afte r returnin g fro mthe field
. 3.1.3. 7 Continuou s Emission s Monitorin g (THC , C0 2 

### , C O an d 0 2 

### ) CEM s wer e use dto monito r the concentration s o f

tota l hydrocarbon s (THC) , carbo n dioxid e (CO2) , carbo n monoxid e (CO) , an doxyge n (O2 ) i n th e stac k gas . CO , correctedto 7 % 0 2

### i s reporte dfo r th e stac k gase s fro mpermanent

installatio n CEM S o n eac ho f

th e thre e incinerators
. Th e concentration s o f THC , CO2 , an dO 2 i n the stack ga s were determine dusin g EP AMethod s 25 A an d3A , respectively
. CO 2 an dO 2 were monitore dusin g Metho d3 A to determin e the stac k gas compositio n (i.e. , molecula r weight ) use dto determin e th e flowrat e o f

th e stac k

gas , an dto correc t

the stac k

samplin g result s to 7 % oxygen . Bot ho f thes e method s utiliz e continuou s monitors
. 3. 2 Analysi s Procedure s Sample s collecte ddurin g th e CP T were analyze dfo r the parameter s specifie di n Tabl e 3-6
. Al l analyse s were performe db y Tes t Americ aLaboratorie s i n Knoxville , TN
. Analytica l result s fo r

the wast e fee dsample s ar

e reporte do n a

n as-received

o r wet weight basis
. Sample s o f

th e waste fee dwere no t drie dprio r

to analysis
. Tabl e 3-6 . Summar

y o f Analytica l Method s Paramete

r Strea m Analytica l Metho d
Moisture Stac k Gas EP AMetho d4
Metal s Wast e Feeds , Spikin g Solutions , Stac

k Gas ICPE S - SW-84 6 Metho d6010B

CVAA S - Hg , SW-84 6 Metho d7470 A or7471 A P M Stac k Gas Gravimetri c - EP AMetho d5 HC1/C1 2 Stac k Gas I C - EP AMetho d26 A Dioxins/Furan s Stac k Gas HRGC/M S - SW-84 6 Metho d8290 A Composition/Physical Parameter s Wast

e Feeds EP Aand/o r AST M Standar

dMethod s



### 3-1 3

### 3.2. 1 Compositio n an d Physica l Parameter s Analysi s Sample s o f

the waste feed s wil l b e collecte dfo r determinatio n o f

anumbe r

o f chemica l an dphysica l parameters . Sample s o f th e waste feed s were analyze dfo r th e followin g parameters , b y th e reference dstandardmethods :

• As h- AST M Metho dAST M D-482 ;

• Tota l Chlorin e - SW-84 6 Method s 505 0 an d9056A ;

• Moistur e - AST M Metho dE-20 3 o r D-4017(Karl-Fische r

titration ) fo r

liqui dwaste , an dAST M Metho dD-514 2 o r D-160. 3 (los s o n drying ) fo r soli dwaste ;

• Calorifi c Valu e - AST M Metho dD-586 5 o r D-240 ;

• Densit y - AST M Metho dD-1475 ; an d

• Viscosit y - AST M Metho dD-445
. 3.2. 2 Metal s Analysi s Wast e fee dsample s were analyze dfo r metal s usin g atrac e leve l inductivel y couple d argo n plasm aemissio n spectroscop y (ICPES ) an datomi c absorptio n spectroscopy . Sample s wer e prepare dfo r

analysi s usin g SW-84 6 Metho d3050B
. Th e metal s analyze db y ICPE S (SW-84 6 Metho d6010B ) ar

e arseni c (As) , berylliu m(Be) , cadmiu m(Cd) , chromiu m(Cr) , an dlea d(Pb)
. Mercur y (Hg ) wa s analyze dusin g Metho d7471 A o f SW-846
. Spikin g solution s o f chromiu m an dmercury wer e analyze dfo r chromiu man dmercury , respectively
. Th e Metho d2 9 samplin g trai n use dto collec t sample s o f

th e stac k

gas fo r metal s wa s analyze dusin g ICPE S accordin g to SW-84 6 Metho d6010 B fo r arseni c (As) , berylliu m(Be) , cadmiu m(Cd) , chromiu m(Cr) , an dlea d(Pb) , an dmercury wa s analyze dusin g Metho d7470 A o f SW-846
. 3.2. 3 P M Analysi s Th e P M concentratio n o f the stac k

ga s wa s determine dfollowin g 4 0 CF R60 , Appendi x A , Metho d5 protocols
. Th e was hfro mthe nozzle , prob e liner , an dglasswar e prio r to th e filte r (PNR ) o f the samplin g trai n wa s evaporated , an dth e mas s determine do n an analytica l balance
. Th e filte r

recovere dfro mthe samplin g trai n wa s desiccated , an dweighe dto determin e th e mas s o f particulat e o n th e filter
. Th e combine dmas s fro mth e filte r an dthe evaporate dwas har e use d wit hth e tota l volum e o f gas sample dto determin e the particulat e loading
. 3.2. 4 HCI/CI 2 

### Analysi s Th e sulfuri c aci dan dsodiu mhydroxid e impinge r catche s an drinse s fro mthe Modifie d Metho d26 A samplin g train s were analyze dfo r chlorid e io n concentration s usin g the analytica l

3-1 4

### approac hspecifie di n Metho d26A
. Th e Modifie dMetho d26 A samplin g trai n wa s recovere dto

provid e arins e o f

the transfe r

lin e an dcontent s an drinse s o f th e acidi c impinger s (an dknockou t impinger ) fo r

determinatio n o f

hydroge n chloride ; an dth e content s an drinse s o f the alkalin e impinger s fo r

determinatio n o f

chlorine
. Bot hwere analyze dfo r chlorid e b y io n chromatograph y (IC ) fo r determinatio n o f

chloride
. Th e chlorid e foun di n the aci dimpinger s (an drinses ) i s reporte das HCl , an dth e chlorid e determine di n th e alkalin e impinger s (an drinses ) i s reporte das CI2
. Sodiu mthiosulfat e wa s adde dto th e collecte dalkalin e impinge r sample s i n the analytica l laboratory befor e analysis
. 3.2. 5 Dioxins/Furan s Analysi s Sample s o f

the stac k ga s were collecte dusin g SW-84 6 Metho d0023A , an dwere analyze dfo r

dioxins/furan s usin g SW-84 6 Metho d8290A , hig hresolutio n ga s chromatograph y (HRGC ) wit hhig hresolutio n mas s spectroscop y (HRMS ) analytica l technique
. Th e analytica l protoco l include s quantitatio n o f al l dibenzodioxin s an ddibenzofuran s includin g fou r o r mor e chlorin e atoms . Th e metho dprovide s congener clas s definitio n fo r

eac ho f th e fiv e congener group s (tetra- , penta- , hexa- , hepta- , an docta-)
. I n addition , eac hindividua l isome r containin g th e 2,3,7,8-substitutio n patter n wa s individuall y quantified
. Dioxins/furan s concentration s ar e reporte dfor :

• Combinatio n o f

th e filte r an dal l th e rinse s betwee n th e nozzl e an dfilter ; an d

• Combinatio n o f

th e sorbent

an dal l the rinse s betwee n the filte r an dsorbent
. 3. 3 Proces s Monitorin g Procedure s Th e incinerato r

system s ar

e monitore dt

o ensure operatio n i s i n accordanc e wit hthe permittedconditions
. Durin g th e performanc e test , th e automati c waste fee dcutof f system s wer e operational ; however , AWFC O limit s i n the current NO C were adjuste do r disable ddurin g th e performanc e testin g period s t o allo w target operation s to b e achieved
. Th e CP T Pla n prescribe da Continuou s Monitorin g Syste mPerformanc e Evaluatio n Tes t fo r eac ho f th e thre e incinerators
. Th e Continuou s Monitorin g Syste mPerformanc e Evaluatio n Tes t Report s (CMSPETR ) fo r the thre e incinerator s ar

e include da

s Appendi x D
. Th e ra w proces s monitorin g dat afro mth e CP T testin g o f

eac ho f th e thre e incinerator s ar e presente di n Appendi x C
.

3-1 5

### 4. 0 Result s

Thi s sectio n present s th e result s o f the comprehensiv e performanc e tes t o f Veolia' s incinerator s a

t Sauget
. Th e analytica l result s fo r th e waste fee dstream s an dstac k gas ar e presente di n Section s 4. 1 an d4.2
. Th e collectio n o f sample s an dth e method s use dfo r samplin g an danalysi s ar

e specifie di n th e CP T Pla n an dQAPjP
. Not e tha t value s presente di n thes e table s (an dthroughou t the report ) ar

e rounde dto displa y an appropriat e leve l o f significance
. Al l calculation s ar e don e wit hunrounde dvalues , an dtherefore , i t

ma y no t b e possibl e to reproduc e acalculate dvalu e exactl y fro mthe datashow n i natable
. I t

ma y b e necessar

y t o g o to earlie r

tables , o r

th e ra w dat ai n th e appendices , to reproduc e acalculate dvalu e exactly
. 4. 1 Wast e Feedstream s Fou r waste stream s wer e sample dan danalyze di n bothth e firs t par t an dthe secon dpart o f eac hru n o f

th e CP T test s o f

Unit s 2 an d3 , thre e liqui dwaste stream s an don e soli dwast e stream . Al l ar

e fe dto th e primar y combustio n chamber (PCC)
. Th e stream s sample dan d analyze dare :

• Low-Bt u Liqui dWaste ;
• Hig hBt u Liqui dWaste ;
• Liqui d(Specialty ) Waste ; an d

• Containerize dSoli dWaste
. Fiv e waste stream s wer e sample dan danalyze di n boththe firs t par t an dthe secon dpar

t o f eac hru n o f

th e CP T tes t

o f Uni t 4 , thre e liqui dwaste stream s an dtw o soli dwast e stream s includin g tw o liqui dwaste s an dtw o soli dwaste s tha t wer e fe dto the kil n(i.e. , the primar y combustio n chamber

- PCC) , an done liqui dwaste tha t wa s fe dto the secondary combustio n chambe r (SCC)
. Th e stream s sample dan danalyze dare :

• Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e to Kiln ;
• Hig hBt u Liqui dWast e to Kiln ;
• Containerize dSoli dWaste ;
• Bul k Soli dWaste ; an d

• Liqui dWast e to th e SCC
. Composit e sample s were prepare do f the sample s collecte ddurin g eac ho f th e Metho d5 samplin g tim e i n th e firs t par t o f eac htest , an dthe Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an d

4- 1

### Metho d0023 A samplin g time s o f th e secon dpar

t o f eac htest . Al l o f

th e composit e liqui d waste fee dsample s fro mth e firs t par t an dthe secon dpar

t o f th e CP T test s wer e analyze dfo r ash , total chlorine , hea

t content , moisture , density , an dviscosity
. Al l o f th e composit e soli d waste fee dsample s fro mthe firs t par t an dthe secon dpar

t o f th e CP T test s wer e analyze dfo r ash , total chlorine , hea

t content , an dmoisture
. Th e composit e liqui dan dsoli dwaste fee d sample s collecte ddurin g the Metho d2 9 stack samplin g wer e als o analyze dfo r metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , an dmercury)
. Eac hsampl e wa s give n auniqu e lo g numbe r tha t identifie s th e projec t

an dunit , ru n number , an da

n identificatio n cod e base dupo n the sampl e typ e an dfraction
. A n exampl e o f the lo g number

forma t follows : Proj-XY-AB C Where : Pro

j i s aprojec t

specifi c identification ; X Y represent

th e conditio n an dru n number ; an d A B C i s an alphanumeri c sequenc e describin g th e particular sample
. Her e i s adescriptio n o f th e sampl e code s use dfo r th e waste sample s i n th e CPT
. VS 2 (Veoli aSauge t

an duni t numbe r 2 , 3 , o r 4 ) - Strea mCod e - Tes t Condition/Ru n Number/Part A o r B - Sampl e Descriptio n Stream Codes ; L W F= Liqui dWast e Fee d(t o SC C Uni t

4 ) H B W= High-Bt u Liqui dWast e (t o Kil nUni t

4 ) L B W= Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e (t o Kil nUni t

4 ) C S = Containerize dSolid s (solid s materia l sample dfro mth e bo x containers ) B S = Bul k

Solid s (Uni t

4 only ) C L= Chlorin e Spikin g Materia l (sample s o f th e chlorin e spikin g materia l fro mthe bo x containers ) P B = Lea dSpikin g Materia l (sample s o f th e lea dsalt s containe di n the bo x containers ) H G= Mercur y Spikin g Materia l (sample s o f the vial s containin g the mercury spikin g solutio n i n th e bo x containers ) C R= Chromiu mSpikin g Solutio n

4- 2Tes tCondition/Ru n Number/PartA o rB : Tes t Conditio n i s "1 " fo r

al l sample s an dal l runs . Ru n Number s typicall y ar e 1,2, & 3 , howeve r

additiona l run s performe dto replac e aborte dand/o r

repeate drun s continu e i n sequence , 4 , 5 , etc . Part A refer s to the tes t

segment associate dwit hthe P M emission s testin g (i.e. , th e firs t par t o f th e test)
. Par t B refer s to the tes t

segment associate dwit hthe HCI/CI2 , Metals , and Dioxins/Furan s emission s testin g (i.e. , th e secon dpar t o f th e test)
. Sample Description : Wast e an dspikin g materia l sample s include dindividua l gra b sample s fo r archiving , an dcomposit e sample s specifi c to eac hemission s tes t period
. Thes e ar e labele das follows : Individua l gra

b sample s ar

e labele dwit hthe suffi x as : -Grab 1 , -Grab 2 , -Grab 3 , etc . i n sequentia l order
. Composit e sample s were collecte ddurin g eac hemission s samplin g perio dan dar e represente db y th e followin g I D suffix : COMP 1 = Composit e sampl e collecte ddurin g the P M emission s tes t

perio d COMP2 A = Composit e sampl e collecte ddurin g the HCI/CI 2 emission s

tes t perio d COMP2 B = Composit e sampl e collecte ddurin g the Metal s emission s

tes t perio d COMP2 C = Composit e sampl e collecte ddurin g the dioxins/furan s

emission s tes t

perio d Not e tha t ther e shoul dno t

b e an y COMP2A , B , o r C sample s labele dwit ha"

- xxA- " ru n number , no r shoul dther

e b e an y COMP 1 sample s wit ha"-xxB- " ru n number
. Examples : VS2-HBW-15B-Gra b 4 i s th e 4 t hgra b sampl e o f

High-Bt u liqui dwaste collecte d fo r archiv e durin g Ru n 5-Par t B o n Uni t

2
. VS3-LWF-12A-COMP 1 i s th e composit e sampl e o f th e liqui dwaste fee d collecte dfo r

analysi s durin g P M emission s Ru n 2 tes t perio d(Par

t A ) o n Uni t 3
. Tabl e 4- 1 present s the analytica l result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an dviscosit y i n the Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e fe dt o Uni t 2
. Tabl e 4- 2 present s the analytica l result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an dviscosit y i n the High-Bt u Liqui dWast e fe dt o Uni t 2
.

4- 3

### Tabl e 4- 3 present s the analytica l result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an dviscosit y i n th e Specialt y Liqui dWast e fe dto Uni t 2
. Tabl e 4- 4 present s the analytica l result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , an d moistur e i n th e Containerize dSoli dWast e fe dto Uni t 2
. Tabl e 4- 5 present s the analytica l result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an dviscosit y i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e fe dto Uni t 3
. Tabl e 4- 6 present s the analytica l result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an dviscosit y i n th e High-Bt u Liqui dWast e fe dto Uni t 3
. Tabl e 4- 7 present s th e analytica l result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an dviscosit y i n th e Specialt y Liqui dWast e fe dto Uni t 3
. Tabl e 4- 8 present s th e analytica l result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , an d moistur e i n th e Containerize dSoli dWast e fe dto Uni t 3
. Tabl e 4- 9 present s the analytica l result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an dviscosit y i n the Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e fe dto th e kil n(PCC ) o f Uni t 4
. Tabl e 4-1 0 present s th e analytica l result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an dviscosit y i n th e High-Bt u Liqui dWast e fe dto th e kil n(PCC ) o f Uni t 4
. Tabl e 4-1 1 present s the analytica l result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an dviscosit y i n th e Liqui dWast e fe dto th e SC C o f Uni t 4
. Tabl e 4-1 2 present s the analytica l result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , an d moistur e i n the Containerize dSoli dWast e fe dto Uni t 4
. Tabl e 4-1 3 present s the analytica l result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , an d moistur e i n th e Bul k

Soli dWast e fe dto Uni t 4
. Th e detaile danalytica l report s ar e presente di n Appendi x Gl
.

4- 4

### Tabl e 4-1 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameters i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui d Waste Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 2 A HCl / Q i 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s Chlorin e mg/k g 34 5 34 0 34 7 36 3 34 6 37 4 40 4 36 4 39 3 34 0 35 7 37 2 As h mg/k g 3,14 0 2,94 0 2,97 0 2,99 0 2,96 0 3,25 0 3,86 0 3,18 0 3,13 0 3,13 0 3,10 0 2,94 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A 2. 7 N A N A N A N A 3. 2 N A N A 2. 1 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A <0.09 7 N A N A N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A <0.09 7 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A 7. 2 N A N A N A N A 9. 0 N A N A 7. 0 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A 0. 8 N A N A N A N A 0.8 8 N A N A 0.7 4 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 1. 1 N A N A N A N A 1. 7 N A N A 1. 1 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.02 1 N A N A N A N A 0.04 2 N A N A 0.05 2 N A Percen t Wate r % 98. 1 98. 0 98. 2 98. 3 97. 9 98. 4 97. 5 96. 6 98. 2 99. 9 99. 0 99. 2 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 17 8 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 0.99 9 1.00 0 0.99 9 1.00 0 1.00 0 0.99 9 1.00 0 1.00 0 Viscosit y cS t 0.93 4 0.93 9 0.93 0 0.93 4 0.93 0 0.93 0 0.93 2 0.93 2 0.93 3 0.92 8 0.92 9 0.92 7



### 4- 5

### Tabl e 4-2 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameters i n th e High-Bt u Liqui d Waste Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 2 A HCI/CI 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k g 7,07 0 6,96 0 7,14 0 7,24 0 7,18 0 3,78 0 3,26 0 3,21 0 3,33 0 3,50 0 3,58 0 3,45 0 As h mg/k g 1,35 0 1,03 0 1,10 0 1,04 0 1,01 0 1,18 0 55 7 58 2 55 1 2,08 0 1,21 0 1,35 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A 8. 3 N A N A N A N A 2. 8 N A N A <0.3 2 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A N A N A <0.09 9 N A N A <0.09 6 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A <0.07 6 N A N A N A N A <0.07 8 N A N A <0.07 6 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A 0.2 6 N A N A N A N A <0.2 2 N A N A <0.2 1 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 1. 0 N A N A N A N A 0.6 7 N A N A 6. 7 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.02 6 N A N A N A N A 0.02 1 N A N A 0.09 6 N A Percen t Wate r % 22. 1 21. 9 22. 1 21. 9 21. 8 20. 6 20. 0 20. 2 20. 3 27. 6 28. 1 27. 8 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b 9,09 0 9,00 0 9,04 0 9,05 0 9,04 0 9,12 0 9,16 0 9,13 0 9,15 0 8,63 0 8,63 0 8,66 0 Densit y g/m 3 0.88 0 0.87 9 0.88 0 0.87 8 0.87 9 0.87 5 0.86 8 0.86 9 0.86 9 0.88 3 0.88 3 0.88 3 Viscosit y cS t 1.3 1 1.3 0 1.29 1.29 1.2 8 1.1 9 1.1 8 1.1 8 1.1 7 1.60 1.6 2 1.60



### 4- 6

### Tabl e 4-3 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameters i n th e Specialty Liqui d Waste Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Units Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Analytica l Paramete r Units 1 P M 2 A HCI/CI 2 2B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k g 91. 8 10 5 15 9 15 6 14 0 11 1 13 0 12 4 13 0 10 6 92. 4 10 8 As h mg/k g 64 9 60 0 57 5 1,01 0 59 9 59 8 65 7 59 2 57 9 90 4 83 2 83 2 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A N A N A <0. 3 N A N A <0.3 1 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A N A N A <0.09 2 N A N A <0.09 3 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A <0.07 6 N A N A N A N A <0.07 3 N A N A <0.07 3 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A <0.2 1 N A N A N A N A' <0. 2 N A N A <0. 2 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A N A N A <0.2 6 N A N A <0.2 6 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A <0.00 9 N A N A N A N A <0.008 6 N A N A <0.009 9 N A Percen t Wate r % 98. 1 98. 2 98. 2 99. 0 98. 8 98. 4 98. 5 98. 7 98. 3 101. 0 101. 0 100. 0 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 0.99 8 0.99 8 0.99 9 1.00 0 0.99 7 0.99 8 0.99 7 0.99 7 0.99 7 0.99 7 0.99 8 0.99 8 Viscosit y cS t 0.89 7 0.89 4 0.89 4 0.89 6 0.89 7 0.90 0 0.89 5 0.89 7 0.89 7 0.90 6 0.90 7 0.9 1



### 4- 7

### Tabl e 4-4 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameters i n th e Containerize d Solid s Waste Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 2 A

HCVC1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M 1

P M 2 A 

### Hcyci

2 2 B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s Chlorin e mg/k g 28 8 18 4 16 7 23 7 28 4 43 3 34 5 49 9 26 7 34 6 39 6 35 1 As h mg/k g 675,00 0 785,00 0 708,00 0 676,00 0 688,00 0 655,00 0 657,00 0 634,00 0 637,00 0 732,00 0 688,00 0 703,00 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A 8. 8 N A N A N A N A 7. 5 N A N A 8. 8 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A 0.4 8 N A N A N A N A 0.6 1 N A N A 0.7 3 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A 0.08 2 N A N A N A N A <0.07 7 N A N A 0.08 4 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A 12. 8 N A N A N A N A 19. 3 N A N A 16. 7 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 11. 6 N A N A N A N A 11. 7 N A N A 13. 5 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.04 5 N A N A N A N A 0.02 2 N A N A 0.01 6 N A Percen t Wate r % 20. 2 23. 4 21. 7 24. 5 26. 2 24. 9 25. 2 25. 1 25. 1 22. 6 25. 4 20. 8 Heatin g Valu e BtuA b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A Viscosit y cS t N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A



### 4- 8

### Tabl e 4-5 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameters i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui d Waste Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k g 40 9 44 0 56 3 41 9 40 8 42 7 40 9 42 9 40 0 38 8 40 8 42 4 As h mg/k g 3,09 0 4,07 0 4,86 0 3,70 0 3,28 0 3,65 0 3,20 0 3,20 0 3,00 0 2,94 0 3,46 0 3,10 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A N A 4. 8 N A N A N A 3. 2 N A N A 3. 3 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A N A <0.09 7 N A N A <0.09 6 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A N A 15. 2 N A N A N A 9. 4 N A N A 11. 3 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A N A 1. 3 N A N A N A 0.8 7 N A N A 0.9 7 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A N A 3. 1 N A N A N A 1. 9 N A N A 1. 9 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A N A 0.06 5 N A N A N A 0.04 9 N A N A 0.0 8 N A Percen t Wate r % 101. 0 99. 8 99. 3 99. 8 100. 0 98. 2 99. 3 100. 0 99. 2 99. 7 99. 5 99. 9 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 17 3 36 1 25 6 15 8 46 2 20 9 18 1 21 3 15 4 <13 0 13 2 Densit y g/m 3 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 0.99 9 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.01 0 1.00 0 Viscosit y cS t 0.93 2 0.93 1 0.93 3 0.93 2 0.93 5 0.93 5 0.94 0 0.93 3 0.93 7 0.93 5 0.93 2 0.93 4



### 4- 9

### Tabl e 4-6 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameters i n th e High-Bt u Liqui d Waste Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k g 3,45 0 2,41 0 2,46 0 2,72 0 2,43 0 1,73 0 1,69 0 1,65 0 1,62 0 1,91 0 1,81 0 1,83 0 As h mg/k g 1,26 0 93 7 1,10 0 1,16 0 73 0 59 9 47 8 58 6 64 8 73 4 69 3 73 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A N A 12. 4 N A N A N A 1. 7 N A N A 2. 4 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.09 5 N A N A N A <0. 1 N A N A <0.09 6 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.07 5 N A N A N A <0.07 9 N A N A <0.07 6 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.2 1 N A N A N A <0.2 2 N A N A <0.2 1 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A N A 1. 8 N A N A N A 1. 0 N A N A 1. 3 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A N A 0.02 7 N A N A N A 0.02 9 N A N A 0.02 2 N A Percen t Wate r % 24. 0 23. 9 23. 9 24. 1 24. 0 23.3 23. 0 23. 0 23. 1 25. 2 25. 2 25. 4 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b 8,68 0 8,82 0 8,70 0 8,70 0 8,80 0 8,84 0 8,87 0 8,79 0 8,86 0 8,55 0 8,62 0 8,56 0 Densit y g/m 3 0.87 9 0.87 8 0.87 7 0.87 7 0.87 8 0.87 4 0.87 4 0.87 3 0.87 4 0.87 9 0.87 9 0.88 0 Viscosit y cS t 1.3 3 1.3 0 1.3 0 1.3 1 1.3 0 1.2 8 1.2 6 1.27 1.2 6 1.3 5 1.3 5 1.3 6



### 4-1 0

### Tabl e 4-7 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameters i n th e Specialty Liqui d Waste Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 2 A

HCI/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s Chlorin e mg/k g 18 8 17 4 1,48 0 69 6 58 7 11 1 10 1 12 5 11 2 11 3 12 7 9 2 As h mg/k g 59 1 62 2 91 7 71 3 73 3 58 8 52 0 52 0 52 1 64 8 62 0 60 6 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A <0.3 3 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.09 8 N A N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A <0.09 9 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.07 7 N A N A N A <0.07 6 N A N A <0.07 8 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.2 2 N A N A N A <0.2 1 N A N A <0.2 2 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A <0.2 8 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A N A <0.008 8 N A N A N A <0.009 4 N A N A <0.009 9 N A Percen t Wate r % 98. 4 97. 7 97.3 98. 7 95. 8 97. 9 97. 2 98. 4 96. 2 97. 1 99. 2 97. 1 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 0.99 8 1.00 0 1.00 0 0.99 9 1.00 0 0.99 9 0.99 7 0.99 7 0.99 8 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 Viscosit y cS t 0.90 1 0.90 4 0.89 8 0.90 3 0.89 7 0.89 7 0.89 9 0.90 1 0.89 9 0.89 8 0.89 8 0.89 7



### 4-1 1

### Tabl e 4-8 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Tota l Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameters i n th e Containerize d Solid s Waste Fee d Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 1

P M 2 A 

### Hcyci

2 2 B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HC1/CI 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s Chlorin e mg/k g 25 3 22 9 48 2 19 5 12 9 34 7 11 5 27 1 20 4 38 2 25 5 29 7 As h mg/k g 670,00 0 682,00 0 663,00 0 775,00 0 737,00 0 778,00 0 655,00 0 715,00 0 682,00 0 721,00 0 686,00 0 698,00 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A N A 7. 5 N A N A N A 6. 4 N A N A 8. 4 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A N A 0.5 8 N A N A N A 0.5 5 N A N A 0.7 9 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.07 1 N A N A N A <0.07 6 N A N A <0.07 1 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A N A 13. 6 N A N A N A 13. 7 N A N A 18. 9 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A N A 11. 1 N A N A N A 10. 7 N A N A 14. 1 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A N A 0.02 8 N A N A N A 0.02 8 N A N A 0.02 6 N A Percen t Wate r % 18. 2 15. 8 22. 5 27. 4 22. 0 28. 7 20. 8 25. 0 19. 0 27. 5 24. 8 22. 6 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A Viscosit y cS t N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A



### 4-1 2

### Tabl e 4-9 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameters i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui d Waste Fee d t o th e Kil n
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M Chlorin e mg/k g 47 2 41 6 41 3 44 9 46 7 39 3 42 2 53 7 48 6 53 2 43 9 53 0 As h mg/k g 2,79 0 2,91 0 3,10 0 2,57 0 3,06 0 3,26 0 2,94 0 3,32 0 3,22 0 2,63 0 3,26 0 3,25 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A 5. 5 N A N A 4. 9 N A N A N A 2. 9 N A N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A <0.09 4 N A N A <0.09 8 N A N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A 13. 6 N A N A 12. 1 N A N A N A
. 9. 4 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A 1. 3 N A N A 1. 2 N A N A N A 0.8 4 N A N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 3. 3 N A N A 2. 9 N A N A N A 1. 6 N A N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.1 1 N A N A 0.1 4 N A N A N A 0.1 1 N A N A Percen t Wate r % 98. 8 97. 3 97. 7 97. 0 96. 5 95. 8 97. 3 97. 1 98. 1 98. 6 96. 9 98. 8 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 15 7 16 6 <13 0 19 7 <13 0 28 3 40 2 Densit y g/m 3 0.99 9 1.00 0 1.00 0 0.99 9 0.99 9 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 0.99 9 1.00 0 0.99 9 Viscosit y cS t 0.93 4 0.93 9 0.92 9 0.93 3 0.92 8 0.93 3 0.92 9 0.93 2 0.93 0 0.93 2 0.93 2 0.93 2



### 4-1 3

### Tabl e 4-10 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameters i n th e High-Bt u Liqui d Waste Fee d t o th e Kil n
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M Chlorin e mg/k g 1,47 0 1,45 0 1,49 0 1,42 0 1,39 0 1,36 0 1,36 0 1,35 0 1,36 0 1,35 0 1,35 0 1,33 0 As h mg/k g 1,61 0 2,35 0 2,11 0 1,82 0 89 8 1,01 0 1,02 0 1,50 0 97 3 93 1 1,02 0 98 9 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A 1. 4 N A N A 0.3 7 N A N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A <0.09 9 N A N A <0.09 3 N A N A N A <0.09 7 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A 0.1 2 N A N A <0.07 3 N A N A N A <0.07 7 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A 0.2 4 N A N A <0. 2 N A N A N A <0.2 1 N A N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 1. 1 N A N A 0. 4 N A N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.04 8 N A N A 0.02 1 N A N A N A 0.01 8 N A N A Percen t Wate r % 24. 0 24. 3 24. 0 23. 8 25. 0 24. 9 24. 5 25. 2 24. 8 25. 1 24. 7 24. 8 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b 8,74 0 8,70 0 8,69 0 8,75 0 8,78 0 8,76 0 8,73 0 8,76 0 8,79 0 8,75 0 8,78 0 8,81 0 Densit y g/m 3 0.87 6 0.87 7 0.87 6 0.87 7 0.87 7 0.87 7 0.87 7 0.87 7 0.87 7 0.87 8 0.87 7 0.87 7 Viscosit y cS t 1.29 1.2 8 1.2 8 1.29 1.3 7 1.3 7 1.3 7 1.3 8 1.3 6 1.3 7 1.3 6 1.3 6



### 4-1 4

### Tabl e 4-11 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameters i n th e Liqui d Waste Fee d t o th e SC C
Analytica l Paramete r Units Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Units 1 P M 2 A HCI/CI 2 2B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M Chlorin e mg/k g 1,25 0 1,23 0 1,25 0 1,21 0 1,26 0 2,50 0 1,24 0 1,27 0 1,28 0 1,25 0 1,28 0 1,32 0 As h mg/k g 74 4 51 1 48 5 47 8 69 4 67 3 67 2 78 7 65 1 60 4 59 1 74 3 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A <0. 3 N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A N A <0.3 1 N A N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A <0.09 2 N A N A <0.09 8 N A N A N A <0.09 4 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A <0.07 3 N A N A <0.07 7 N A N A N A <0.07 4 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A <0. 2 N A N A <0.2 2 N A N A N A <0.2 1 N A N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 0.2 6 N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A N A <0.2 6 N A N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.01 7 N A N A 0.01 9 N A N A N A 0.01 7 N A N A Percen t Wate r % 27. 0 26. 5 26. 5 26. 2 26. 9 26. 7 27. 0 26. 8 26. 6 25. 6 26. 6 26. 9 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b 8,83 0 8,81 0 8,79 0 8,81 0 8,76 0 8,80 0 8,76 0 8,78 0 8,86 0 8,86 0 8,87 0 8,83 0 Densit y g/m 3 0.87 9 0.87 8 0.87 8 0.87 8 0.87 9 0.87 8 0.87 7 0.87 9 0.87 7 0.87 8 0.87 8 0.87 8 Viscosit y cS t 1.5 4 1.5 2 1.5 2 1.5 2 1.5 3 1.5 2 1.5 2 1.5 2 j 1.5 2 1.5 2 1.5 1 1.5 2



### 4-1 5

### Tabl e 4-12 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameters i n th e Containerize d Solid s Waste Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M Chlorin e mg/k g 17 6 19 2 19 0 16 7 20 5 20 1 25 7 22 7 20 7 18 0 27 1 24 4 As h mg/k g 758,00 0 828,00 0 739,00 0 728,00 0 728,00 0 731,00 0 745,00 0 724,00 0 749,00 0 730,00 0 719,00 0 771,00 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A 2. 4 N A N A 2. 0 N A N A N A 2. 1 N A N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A 0.1 3 N A N A 0.1 6 N A N A N A <0. 1 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A 0.4 6 N A N A 0.4 3 N A N A N A 0.4 5 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A 45. 2 N A N A 58. 9 N A N A N A 35. 1 N A N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 35. 9 N A N A 21 2 N A N A N A 25. 4 N A N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.1 8 N A N A 0.2 4 N A N A N A 0.2 6 N A N A Percen t Wate r % 7.6 4 8.1 0 6.7 5 9.1 0 7.9 3 8.2 9 7.8 2 9.8 8 8.1 1 7.9 4 9.3 1 6.3 1 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A Viscosit y cS t N A N A N A N A • N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A



### 4-1 6

### Tabl e 4-13 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameters i n th e Bul k Solid s Waste Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 2 A

HCI/CI 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M 2 A

HCI/C b 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins/ Furan s 1

P M Chlorin e mg/k g 17 1 18 4 21 9 26 5 25 7 24 3 23 6 19 3 19 1 17 3 18 2 16 4 As h mg/k g 695,00 0 646,00 0 715,00 0 784,00 0 770,00 0 720,00 0 674,00 0 689,00 0 729,00 0 737,00 0 695,00 0 710,00 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A 2. 2 N A N A 3. 0 N A N A N A 2. 2 N A N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A 0.2 1 N A N A 0.2 8 N A N A N A 0.2 6 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A 0.2 8 N A N A 0.3 7 N A N A N A 0.3 0 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A 35. 6 N A N A 37. 9 N A N A N A 29. 8 N A N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 41. 0 N A N A 58. 1 N A N A N A 26. 6 N A N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.08 2 N A N A 0.1 2 N A N A N A 0.07 7 N A N A Percen t Wate r % 14. 2 18. 8 10. 3 11. 6 16. 6 19. 2 19. 9 13. 3 19. 3 17. 3 15. 6 24. 7 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A Viscosit y cS t N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A



### 4-1 7

### 4. 2 Stac k Ga s Sample s o f

stac k gas wer e collecte dfo r

determinatio n o f

th e followin g analytica l parameters :

• PM ;
• HC1/C1 2 

### ; • Metals ; an d
• Dioxins/Furans
. Th e stac k

ga s concentratio n o f

the tes t parameter s reporte das th e averag e o f thre e tes t run s ar e use dto documen t

compliance
. Stac k

ga s concentratio n fo r

aparameter

ma y includ e analytica l result s fo r

multipl e components . Fo r th e determinatio n o f

stac k ga s concentratio n measure di n an individua l sample , o r run , fo r thos e samplin g system s as applicabl e (other tha n SW-84 6 Metho d0023A) , the followin g conventio n i s use dto su mth e result s o f multipl e analyses :

• I n case s wher e al l analytica l result s ar e hit s (i.e. , no t

"non-detects") , al l analytica l result s wil l b e summed
.
• I n case s wher e al l analytica l result s ar e "non-detects, " al l metho ddetectio n limit s wil l b e summed , an dth e summe dresul t reporte das amaximu m("<") •

• I n case s wher e on e o r mor e analytica l result s ar e hits , an done o r

mor e analytica l result s ar e "non-detects, " th e hit s an dthe "non-detects " wil l b e summe dan dreporte d as amaximu m("<")
. Exampl e calculation s o f th e HW C MAC T emissio n limit s fo r PM , HC1/C1 2 

### , metals , dioxins/furans , an dTH C showin g the calculation s performe dfo r areporte dresul t

ar e presente d followin g th e respectiv e table
. 4.2. 1 P M i n Stac k

Ga s Stac k ga s sample s fo r

determinatio n o f

P M wer e collecte daccordin g to EP AMetho d5
. Thes e sample s wer e analyze dgravimetricall y fo r P M accordin g to EP AMetho d5
. Tw o sample s were recovere dfro meac htrai n fo r the determinatio n o f

PM
. The y wer e as follows :

• A n aceton e rins e o f th e prob e an dnozzl e (PNR) , and ;

• Filte r (FILT)
.

4-1 8Th e result s fo r P M ar e presente di n Tabl e 4-1 4 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-1 5 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d Tabl e 4-1 6 fo r

Uni t 4
. Th e concentratio n o f oxyge n measure dusin g CEM S an dEP A Metho d3 A durin g the collectio n o f th e EP A Metho d5 sample s ar e show n i n the tables , an dth e concentratio n o f

P M i n th e stac k

ga s correcte dto 7 % 0 2i s shown
. Th e analytica l result s fo r th e determinatio n o f

P M ar e include di n Appendi x G4
. Tabl e 4-14 . Uni t 2 - Result s o f P M i n Stac k

Ga s Dat e Tim e Run l 10-8-1 3 11:50-13:0

0 Run 2

10-9-1 3 09:45-10:5

3 Ru

n 3 10-10-1 3 09:15-10:2

3 Volum e Collecte

d (dscf ) 40.81

5 42.35

6 41.27

8 Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 11.5

6 11.2

3 11.4

8 P M Foun

d (mg ) Filte r <0. 5 <0. 5 <0. 5 Prob e an dNozzl e Rins e 1.0 5 0.8 0 0.5 5 Tota l <1.5 5 <1. 3 <1.0 5 Stac k Ga s Loadin g Particulat e Matte r (mg/dscf ) <0.03 8 <0.03 1 <0.02 5 Particulat e Matte r (mg/dscm

) <1. 3 <1. 1 <0.90 Particulat e Matte r (mg/dscm , correctedt

o 7 % 0 2 ) <2. 0 <1. 6 <1. 3 Particulat e Matte r (gr/dscf ) <0.0005 9 <0.0004 7 <0.0003 9 Particulat e Matte r (gr/dscf , correctedt

o 7 % 0 2 ) <0.00087 <0.0006 8 <0.0005 8 Particulat e Matte r (gr/dscf , correctedt

o 7 % 0 2 ) <0.0007 1

4-1 9

### Particulat e Matte r HW C MAC TSampl e Calculation , gr/dsc f @ 7% 0 2 

### Uni t 2 - Ru n 2

P M Stac k

Concentratio n (mg/dscf )

P M Stac k

Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) Tota l Mas s Loadin g

(mg ) Sampl e Volum e (dscf ) <1. 3 m g 42.35 6 dsc f <0.03 1

P M Stac k

Concentratio n (gr/dscf)

P M Stac k

Concentratio n (gr/dscf ) Stac k

Concentratio n X (mg/dscf )
<0.03 1 mg/dsc f X 0.0154 3 m g 1 grai n 0.0154 3 m g 1 grai n = <0.0004 7

P M Stac k

Concentratio n (gr/dscf @ 7%0 2 )

P M Stac k

Concentratio n (gr/dscf @ 7 % 0 2 ) Stac k (21 % - 7% ) Concentratio n X (gr/dscf ) (21%-Meas.0 2 )
0.000 6 gr/dsc f X (21-7 ) (21-11.23 ) 0.0006 8



### 4-2 0

### Tabl e 4-15 . Uni t 3 - Result s o f P M i n Stac k

Ga s Dat e Tim e Run l 10-15-1 3 13:16-14:2

5 Ru

n 2 10-16-1 3 11:15-12:2

5 Ru

n 3 10-171 3 09:50-10:5

7 Volum e Collecte

d (dscf ) 41.22

9 42.46

1 41.92

1 Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 12.8

7 13.3

8 11.7

4 Particulat

e Matte rFoun d (mg ) Filte r 1.0 5 1.3 1.1 5 Prob e an dNozzl e Rins e 1.9 5 1.

7 2. 5 Total 3.0 0 3.0

0 3.65 Stac k Ga s Loadin g - Front-Hal

f Onl y Particulat e Matte r (mg/dscf ) 0.072 8 0.070 7 0.087 1 Particulat e Matter (mg/dscm

) 2.5 7 2.5 0 3.0 7 Particulat e Matter (mg/dscm , correctedt

o 7 % 0 2 ) 4.4 5 4.6 1 4.67 Particulat e Matter (gr/dscf ) 0.0011 2 0.00109 0.0013 4 Particulat e Matte r (gr/dscf , correctedt

o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.00194 0.00202 0.0020 4 Particulat e Matte r (gr/dscf , correctedt

o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.00200



### 4-2 1Tabl e 4-16 . Uni t 4 - Result s o f P M i n Stac k

Ga s Dat e Tim e Run l 10-23-1 3 09:30-10:4

2 Run 3 10-25-1 3 09:35-10:4

0 Ru

n 4 10-25-1 3 10:50-11:5

5 Volum e Collecte

d (dscf ) 38.18

1 39.69

1 36.75

9 Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 12.2

2 12.4

8 12.1 1 Particulat

e Matte rFoun d (mg ) Filte r 1.9 5 0. 5 <0. 5 Prob e an dNozzl e Rins e 2. 2 2.3 5 2. 4 Front-Hal f

Total 4.1 5 2.8 5 <2. 9 Stac k Ga s Loadin g - Front-Hal

f Onl y Particulat e Matter (mg/dscf ) 0.109 0.071 8 <0.07 9 Particulat e Matter (mg/dscm

) 3.8 4 2.5 4 <2. 8 Particulat e Matter (mg/dscm , correctedt

o 7 % 0 2 ) 6.1 5 4.1 9 <4.4 Particulat e Matter (gr/dscf ) 0.0016 8 0.0011 1 <0.001 2 Particulat e Matter (gr/dscf , correctedt

o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.00269 0.0018 3 <0.001 9 Particulat e Matter (gr/dscf , correctedt

o 7 % 0 2 ) <0.002 1
4.2. 2 HCI/CI 2 i n Stac k Ga s Stac k ga s sample s fo r

determinatio n o f

HC/CI 2 were collecte dusin g aModifie dMetho d 26A
. Sample s wer e analyze dfo r th e chlorid e io n usin g I C accordin g t o EP A Metho d26A
. Eac h trai n wa s recovere dint o multipl e component s fo r analysi s a

s follows :

• Th e firs t

tw o impingers , whic hcontaine d0. 1 N sulfuri c aci d(ACIDIMP) ; an d

• Th e fourt han dfift himpingers , whic hcontaine d0. 1 N sodiu mhydroxid e (ALKIMP)
. Th e result s fo r

HC1/C1 2ar

e presente di n Tabl e 4-1 7 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-1 8 fo r

Uni t 3 , and Tabl e 4-1 9 fo r

Uni t 4
. Th e concentratio n o f oxyge n measure dusin g CEM S an dEP A Metho d3 A durin g th e secon dhal f

o f the ru n i s show n i n th e tables , an dth e concentratio n o f HC1/C1 2 converte dto chlorid e equivalent s (CT) an dcorrecte dto 7 % O 2 i s shown
. Th e analytica l result s fo r th e determinatio n o f

HCI/CI 2 ar

e include di n Appendi x G4
.

4-2 2

### Tabl e 4-17 . Uni t 2 - Result s o f HCI/CI 2 

### i n Stac k

Ga s Dat e Tim e Run l 10-8-1 3 15:40-16:4

0 Ru

n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30-13:3

0 Run 5

10-30-1 3 12:45-13:4

5 Volum e Collecte

d (dscf ) 37.38

4 37.29

0 36.87

9 Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 10.0

8 10.3

8 10.5

0 Hydrogen Chlorid e 36,600 15,50 0 21,600 Chlorin e <16 0 <180 <180 Concentratio

n (mg/dscf

) Hydrogen Chlorid e 0.97 9 0.41 6 0.58 6 Chlorin e <0.0043 <0.004 8 <0.004 9 Concentratio

n (chlorid

e equivalents

, ppmvd ) Hydrogen Chlorid e 22. 8 9.6 8 13. 6 Chlorin e <0.1 0 <0.1 2 <0.1 2 Total <2 3 <9. 8 <1 4 Concentratio

n (chlorid

e equivalents

, ppmvd, correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ) Total <2 9 <1 3 <1 8 Averag e <2 0



### 4-2 3

### HCI/CI 2 

### HW C MAC TSampl e Calculation , ppmv d Uni t 2-Ru n 2 Su m o f HC l Sampl e HC l Stac k

Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) = Fractio n Value s (u.g ) X HC l Stac k

Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) = Sampl e Volum e (dscf ) 15,50 0 p g 37.29 0 dsc f 

### 7 % 0 2 lm g 

### i ( r p g lm g 10' n g = 0.41 6 HC l Stac k

Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalents ppmvd )

HC l Stac k

Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalents ppmvd )

Cl 2Stac k Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) Cl 2Stac k Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) = Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) 28.31 7 L/c

f 2 4 L/g-mo l Molecula r Weight o

f HCl (g/g-mol ) 0.41 6 mg/dsc

f HCl 28.31 7 L/c

f 2 4 L/g-mo l 36. 5 g/g-mo l Su m o f Cl 2Sampl e Fractio n Value s (pg ) Sampl e Volum e (dscf

) <18 0 pg 37.29 0 dsc f 1 0 mg

10 6ppmv

d l g 1 0 mg 10 sppmv

d lm g 10 * u g lm g 9.6

8

1( T u g <0.004 8 CI 2 Stac k Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalents ppmvd )

CI 2 Stac k Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalents ppmvd ) Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) X 28.31 7 L/c

f 2 4 L/g-mo l X [Molecula r Weight o

f CI 2 (g/g-mol)

] / 2 Chlorid e Equivalent

s <0.004 8 mg/dsc

f CI 2 X 28.31 7 L/c

f 2 4 L/g-mo l X 35. 5 g/g-mo l l g 1 0 mg 10 6ppmv

d

l g 1 0 mg 10 sppmv

d <0.1 2

Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalents ppmvd ) Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalents ppmvd ) HCl Stack Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalent

s ppmvd ) 9.6 8 ppmv d CI 2 Stack Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalent

s ppmvd) <0.1 2 ppmv

d <9.

8
Concentratio n (ppmv

d @ 7 % 02 ) Concentratio n (ppmv

d @ 7% 02 ) Concentratio n (chlorid e

equivalent

s ppmvd ) <9.8 0 ppmv d (21 % - 7% ) (21 % - Meas . 02 ) (21-7 ) (21-10.38 ) <1 3



### 4-2 4

### Tabl e 4-18 . Uni t 3 - Result s o f HCI/CI 2 

### i n Stac k

Ga s Dat e Tim e Ru

n 2 10-16-1 3 14:00-15:0

0 Ru

n 3 10-17-1 3 12:30-13:3

3 Run 4

10-18-1 3 09:35-10:3

5 Volum e Collecte

d (dscf ) 36.08

8 34.59

7 35.24

1 Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 11.1

9 10.7

2 10.8

7 Mas s Foun d (ug ) Hydrogen Chlorid e 4,74 0 4,720 1,81 0 Chlorin e <13 0 <12 0 <14

0 Concentratio

n (mg/dscf

) Hydrogen Chlorid e 0.13 1 0.13 6 0.051 4 Chlorin e <0.003 6 <0.003 5 <0.004 0 Concentratio

n (chlorid

e equivalent

s ppmvd ) Hydrogen Chlorid e 3.06 3.1 8 1.2 0 Chlorin e <0.08 6 <0.08 3 <0.09 5 Total <3. 1 <3. 3 <1. 3 Concentratio

n (Chlorid

e equivalents

, ppmvd, correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ) Total <4. 5 <4.4 <1. 8 Averag e <3. 6



### Tabl e 4-19 . Uni t 4 - Result s o f HCI/CI 2 

### i n Stac k

Ga s Dat e Tim e Run l 10/23/201 3 12:36-13:3

6 Ru

n 3 10/24/201 3 12:35-13:3

5 Run 4

10/25/201 3 13:35-14:3

5 Volum e Collecte

d (dscf ) 39.93

5 39.26

4 37.03

4 Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 12.2

7 12.3

7 12.0

0 Mas s Foun d (ug ) Hydrogen Chlorid e 11,10 0 8,15 0 23,600 Chlorin e <13 0 <12 0 <14

0 Concentratio

n (mg/dscf

) Hydrogen Chlorid e 0.27 8 0.20 8 0.63 7 Chlorin e <0.003 3 <0.003 1 <0.003 8 Concentratio

n (chlorid

e equivalent

s ppmvd ) Hydrogen Chlorid e 6.4 7 4.84 14. 8 Chlorin e <0.07 8 <0.07 3 <0.09 1 Total <6. 6 <4. 9 <1 5 Concentratio

n (Chlorid

e equivalents

, ppmvd, correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ) Total <1 1 <8. 0 <2 3 Averag e <1 4



### 4-2 5

### 4.2. 3 Metal s i n Stac k Ga s Metal s were sample di n th e stac k ga s usin g EP AMetho d29
. Th e sample s were analyze d fo r th e si x (6 ) metal s regulate db y th e HW C MACT
. Fiv e metals , arsenic , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , an dlead ) wer e analyze dusin g ICPE S accordin g to Metho d60 1 O B o f SW-846
. Mercur y analysi s wa s performe db y col dvapo r atomi c absorptio n spectroscop y accordin g to Metho d7470 A o f

SW-846
. Th e Metho d2 9 samplin g train s were recovere dt o provid e the followin g fractions :

• Prob e an dnozzl e rins e wit h0. 1 N nitri c aci d(PNR) ;

• Filte r (FILT) ;

• Conten t

an drins e o f

th e acidifie dperoxid e impinger s wit h0. 1 N nitri c aci d(NPI) ;

• Content s an drins e o f th e empty impinge r

wit h0. 1 N nitri c aci d(EIR) ;

• Content s an drins e o f th e acidifie dpermanganate impinger s wit hdeionize dwater , 0. 1 N nitri c acid , an dpermanganate solutio n (Perm) ; and ;

• Rins e o f

th e permanganate impinger s wit hhydrochlori c aci d(HClRns)
. Th e analytica l result s fo r metal s i n th e individua l sampl e fraction s ar e presente di n Tabl e 4-2 0 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-2 2 fo r

Uni t 3 , an dTabl e 4-2 4 fo r

Uni t 4
. Th e concentration s o f the metal s i n th e stac k

gas ar e presente di n Tabl e 4-2 1 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-2 3 fo r

Uni t 3 , an dTabl e 4-2 5 fo r Uni t 4
. Th e concentratio n o f oxyge n measure dusin g CEM S an dEP AMetho d3 A durin g the secon dhal f

o f the tes t ar e show n i n Table s 4-21 , 4-23 , an d4-25 , an dthe concentratio n o f metal s i n th e stac k

ga s correcte dto 7 % O 2 i s shown
. Th e concentration s o f cadmiu man dlea d ar e show n summe das SVM , an dth e concentration s o f arsenic , beryllium , an dchromiu mar e show n summe da

s LVM
. Th e analytica l result s fo r the determinatio n o f

metal s i n th e stac k

gas are include di n Appendi x G3
.

4-2 6

### Tabl e 4-20 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s
Ru n Analyt

e Nitric Aci d PN R & Filter Nitric Aci d &

Hydroge n Peroxid e Impinger

s Empt

y Impinge r Rins e Potassiu

m Permanganat

e Impinge r HC l Rins e Tota

l

1 Arseni c <0.3 7 <0.2 5 <0.2

5 <0.87
1 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.045 1 Cadmiu m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.06 3 1 Chromiu m 3. 3 0.7 8 0.3 3 4.4 1 1 Lead 1.3 0.3 5 <0.2 7 <1. 9 1
Mercury <0.08 84. 2 51. 6 <31.13 6 1. 1 <170

3 Arseni c <0.7 4 <0.2

5 <0.99 3 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.03 3 Cadmiu m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.042 3 Chromiu m 2. 5 0.5 5 3.05 3 Lea d < 1 0.2 7 <1. 3 3
Mercur

y <0.0 8 182 0.5 7 0. 5 17. 2 <20 0

5 Arseni c 0.7 7 <0.2 5 < 1 5 Berylliu m 0.01 6 <0.01 5 <0.03 1 5 Cadmiu m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.042 5 Chromiu m 2. 3 0.8 1 3.1 1 5 Lea d < 1 0.6 6 <1. 7 5
Mercury <0.08 14 2 <0.1 5 3. 4 14. 3 <16 0

1 The empt

y impinger

wa s analyzedfo r

As , Be , Cd , Cr , an

dP b du e t o carry-ove

r fro mth e secon dnitri c aci dan

d hydroge n peroxide impinger
.



### 4-2 7

### Tabl e 4-21 . Uni t 2 - Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s Run l Ru

n 3 Ru

n 5 Dat e 10-8-1

3 10-10-1

3 10-30-1

3 Tim e 15:40-18:4

3 12:30-15:1

0 12:45-15:3

2 Averag

e Volum e Collecte

d (dscf ) 84.95

2 78.95

1 79.60

7 Averag

e Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 10.0

8 10.3

8 10.5

0 Averag

e
Mas s Foun d (ug ) Arseni c <0.87 <0.99 <1. 0 Berylliu m <0.045 <0.03 0 <0.03 1 Cadmium <0.06 3 <0.042 <0.042 Chromiu m 4.4 1 3.0 5 3.1 1 Lea d <1. 9 <1. 3 <1. 7 Mercur y <170 <20 0 <16

0 Stac k Ga s Concentratio

n (ug/dscf

) Arseni c <0.01 0 <0.01 3 <0.01 3 <0.01 2 Berylliu m <0.0005 3 <0.0003 8 <0.0003 9 <0.0004 3 Cadmium <0.00074 <0.0005 3 <0.0005 3 <0.0006 0 Chromiu m 0.051 9 0.038 6 0.039 1 0.043 2 Lead <0.023 <0.01 6 <0.02 1 <0.02 0 Mercur y <2. 0 <2. 5 <2. 0 <2. 2 Stac k Ga s Concentratio

n (ng /dscm ) Arseni c <0.3 6 <0.4 4 <0.45 <0.42 Berylliu m <0.01 9 <0.01 3 <0.01 4 <0.01 5 Cadmium <0.02 6 <0.01 9 <0.01 9 <0.02 1 Chromium 1.83 1.3 6 1.3 8 1.5 3 Lead <0.80 <0.5 7 <0.74 <0.7 0 Mercur y <70 <9 0 <7 1 <7 7 Stac k Ga s Concentratio

n (ng /dscm , 7 % 0 2 ) Arseni c <0.46 <0.5 9 <0.6 0 <0.5 5 Berylliu m <0.02 4 <0.01 8 <0.01 8 <0.02 0 Cadmium <0.03 4 <0.02 5 <0.025 <0.02 8 Chromium 2.3 5 1.8 0 1.8

4 2.00 Lea d <1. 0 <0.7 5 <0.9 8 <0.9 2 Mercury <9 0 <12

0 <9

5 <10

0 SV M (Cd , Pb ) <1. 1 <0.7 8 <1. 0 <0.95 L V M (As , Be , Cr) <2. 8 <2.4 <2. 5 <2. 6 Mercur y <9 0 <12

0 <9

5 <10

0



### 4-2 8

### Tabl e 4-22 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s
Run Analyt

e Nitric Aci d PNR & Filter Nitric Aci d

& Hydroge

n Peroxid e Impinger

s Empt

y Impinge r Rins e Potassiu

m Permanganat

e Impinge r HC l Rins e Tota

l

2 Arseni c <0.74 <0.2 5 <0.99 2 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.03 2 Cadmium <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.042 2 Chromium 10. 6 0.5 6 11. 2 2 Lead 28. 6 <0.2 7 <2 9 2
Mercur

y <0.0 8 8 1 0.29 0.2 1 2. 5 <8 4

3 Arseni c <0.74 <0.2 5 <0.99 3 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.03 3 Cadmium <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.042 3 Chromium 1 1 0.7 9 11. 8 3 Lead 19. 4 <0.2 7 <2 0 3 Mercur

y <0.0 8 52. 2 0.25 <0.04 8 2. 6 <5 5

4 Arseni c <0.3 7 0.8 3 <1. 2
4 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.03 4 Cadmium 0.9 1 <0.02 1 <0.9 3 4 Chromium 13. 7 0.7 2 14. 4 4 Lead 15. 7 0. 3 1 6 4
Mercur

y <0.0 8 5 4 0.1 8 0.1 6 12. 8 <6 7



### 4-2 9

### Tabl e 4-23 . Uni t 3 - Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s Dat e Tim e Ru

n 2 10-16-1 3 14:00-16:5

0 Run 3 10-17-1 3 12:30-15:2

5 Ru

n 4 10-18-1 3 09:35-12:2

0 Averag

e Volum e Collecte

d (dscf ) 71.70

8 69.01

6 71.54

0 Averag

e Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 11.1

9 10.7

2 10.8

7 Averag

e
Mas s Foun d (pg ) Arseni c <0.99 <0.9 9 <1. 2 Berylliu m <0.03 0 <0.03 0 <0.03 0 Cadmiu m <0.04 2 <0.042 <0.9 3 Chromiu m 11. 2 11. 8 14. 4 Lea d <2 9 <2

0 16. 0 Mercury <8 4 <5 5 <6 7 Stac k Ga s Concentratio

n (fig/dscf

) Arseni c <0.0T 4 <0.01 4 <0.01 7 <0.01 5 Berylliu m <0.00042 <0.0004 3 <0.00042 <0.00042 Cadmiu m <0.0005 9 <0.0006 1 <0.01 3 <0.004 7 Chromiu m 0.15 6 0.17 1 0.20 2 0.17 6 Lea d <0.4 0 <0.2

9 0.22

4 <0.3 0 Mercury <1. 2 <0.80 <0.9 4 <0.9

7 Stac k Ga s Concentratio

n (jig/dscm

) Arseni c <0.4 9 <0.5 1 <0.5 9 <0.5 3 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.01 5 Cadmium <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.46 <0.1 7 Chromiu m 5.5 0 6.0 3 7.1 2 6.22 Lea d <1 4 <1 0 7.9 0 <1 1 Mercur y <4 1 <28 <3 3 <3 4 Stac k Ga s Concentratio

n (ng /dscm, 7 % 0 2 ) Arseni c <0.70 <0.69 <0.8 2 <0.7 4 Berylliu m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.02 1 Cadmiu m <0.03 0 <0.029 <0.6 4 <0.23 Chromiu m 7.87 8.23 9.87 8.66 Lea d <2 0 <1 4 10. 9 <1 5 Mercury <59 <3 9 <46 <48 SV M (Cd , Pb ) <2 0 <1 4 <1 2 <1 5 L V M (As , Be , Cr) <8. 6 <8. 9 <1 1 <9.4 Mercury <59 <3 9 <46 <4 8



### 4-3 0

### Metal s HW C MAC TSampl e Calculation , ug/dsc m @ 7% 0 2 

### Tota l Mas s (pg) = Su m o f Masse s i n Individua l Sampl e Fraction s (Se e Tabl e 4-20

) Uni t 2 - Ru n 1 , Arseni c Arseni c Mas

s (u.g ) Metal s Stac k

Concentratio n (ug

/dscf )
Metal s Stac k

Concentratio n (ug/dscf ) Sample Volum e (dscf ) <0.8 7 u g <0.010 84.95 2 dsc

f

Metal s Stac k

Concentratio n (ug/dscm )
Metal s Stac k

Concentratio n (ug/dscm ) Arseni c Stac k Concentratio n (ug/dscf )
<0.01 0 ug/dscf 35.315 dsc f 1 dscm 35.315 dsc

f 1 dscm = <0.3 6

Metal s Stac k

Concentratio n (u.g/dsc m _ Arseni c Stac k

(21 % - 7% ) @ 7% 0 2 ) Concentratio n (ug/dscm ) ( 2 i % . Meas . 0 2 ) Metal s Stac k

Concentratio n (ug/dsc m _< o 3 6 X" 7 ^
_< Q 4f - @ 7 % 0 2 ) (2 i
_ 10.O8)



### 4-3 1

### Tabl e 4-24 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s
Ru n Analyt

e Nitric Aci d PN R & Filter Nitric Aci d

& Hydroge

n Peroxid e Impinger

s Empt

y Impinge r Rins e Potassiu

m Permanganat

e Impinge r HC l Rins e Tota

l

1 Arseni c 9. 1 <0.2 5 <9. 4
1 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.0 3 1 Cadmiu m 0.3 3 <0.02 1 <0.3 5 1 Chromiu m 5. 5 0.8 2 6.3 2 1 Lead 10. 4 0.7 1 11. 1 1
Mercur

y <0.08 9 <0.1 2 <0.04 8 0.2 2 <9. 5

2 Arseni c 7. 9 <0.2 5 <8. 2
2 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.03 2 Cadmiu m 0.1 5 <0.02 1 <0.1 7 2 Chromiu m 4. 2 0.6 6 4.8 6 2 Lead 5. 4 0.42 5.8 2 2
Mercur

y <0.08 10. 4 <0.1 2 <0.04 7 <0.08 2 <1 1

3 Arseni c 2. 7 <0.2 5 < 3
3 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.03 3 Cadmium 0.069 <0.02 1 <0.0 9 3 Chromiu m 6. 9 0.62 7.5 2 3 Lea d 1 4 0.4 4 14. 4 3
Mercur

y <0.08 19. 5 <0.1 2 <0.04 7 0.7 5 <2 0



### 4-3 2

### Tabl e 4-25 . Uni t 4 - Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s Dat e Tim e Ru

n 1 10-23-1 3 12:36-15:2

0 Run 2

10-24-1 3 12:35-15:1

5 Ru

n 3 10-25-1 3 13:35-16:1 1 Averag e Volum e Collecte

d (dscf ) 76.06

8 76.49

8 76.84

6 Averag

e Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 12.2

7 12.3

7 12.0

0 Averag

e
Mas s Foun d (jig ) Arseni c <9. 4 <8. 2 <3. 0 Berylliu m <0.03 0 <0.03 0 <0.03 0 Cadmiu m <0.3 5 <0.1 7 <0.090 Chromiu m 6.3 2 4.8 6 7.5 2 Lea d 11. 1 5.8 2 14. 4 Mercur y <9. 5 <1 1 <2 0 Stac k Ga s Concentratio

n (ug/dscf

) Arseni c <0.1 2 <0.1 1 <0.03 8 <0.08 9 Berylliu m <0.0003 9 <0.0003 9 <0.0003 9 <0.0003 9 Cadmium <0.0046 <0.0022 <0.001 2 <0.002 7 Chromiu m 0.083 1 0.063 5 0.097 9 0.081 5 Lea d 0.14 6 0.076 1 0.18 8 0.13 7 Mercur y <0.1 2 <0.1 4 <0.2 7 <0.1 8 Stac k Ga s Concentratio

n (ng /dscm ) Arseni c <4. 3 <3. 8 <1.4 <3. 2 Berylliu m <0.01 4 <0.01 4 <0.01 4 <0.01 4 Cadmium <0.1 6 <0.07 9 <0.04 1 <0.09 4 Chromiu m 2.9 3 2.2 4 3.46 2.8 8 Lea d 5.1 6 2.6 9 6.6 4 4.8 3 Mercur y <4. 4 <5. 0 <9.4 <6. 3 Stac k Ga s Concentratio

n (ug/dscm

, 7 % 0 2 ) Arseni c <7. 0 <6. 1 <2. 1 <5. 1 Berylliu m <0.02 2 <0.023 <0.02 2 <0.02

2 Cadmiu m <0.26 <0.1 3 <0.065 <0.1 5 Chromiu m 4.7 3 3.6 6 5.4 0 4.5 9 Lea d 8.3 1 4.3 8 10. 4 7.6 8 Mercur y <7. 1 <8. 1 <1 5 <10. 0 SV M (Cd , Pb ) <8. 6 <4. 5 <1 0 <7. 8 L V M (As , Be , Cr) <1 2 <9. 8 <7. 5 <9. 7 Mercur y <7. 1 <8. 1 <1 5 <10. 0



### 4-3 3

### 4.2. 4 Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s Stac k ga s sample s fo r

determinatio n o f

dioxins/furan s wer e collecte dusin g SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A an dwere analyze dusin g SW-84 6 Metho d8290 , ahig hresolutio n gas chromatograph y (HRGC ) wit hhig hresolutio n mas s spectroscop y (HRMS ) analytica l technique
. Th e samplin g trai n wa s recovere dto provid e the followin g fractions :

• Combine dprob e an dnozzl e rins e wit hacetone , methylen e chlorid e an dtoluen e (PNR) ;

• Filte r

(FILT) ;

• Condense r

rins e wit hacetone , methylen e chloride , an dtoluen e (CR) ; an d

• XA D sorbent

(XAD)
. Component s recovere dfro mthe trai n were combine da s follows :

• Combinatio n o f

th e filte r

an dal l th e rinse s betwee n th e nozzl e an dfilter ; an d

• Combinatio n o f

th e sorbent

an dal l the rinse s betwee n th e filte r an dsorbent
. Afte r sampl e cleanu p an dconcentratio n procedure s a t th e analytica l laboratory , an aliquo t o f th e front-hal f

extract s (i.e. , PN Ran dfilter ) i s combine dan danalyze dusin g SW-84 6 Metho d 829 0 fo r dioxms/furan s separat

e fro mth e back-hal f

component s (i.e. , condenser rinses , XA D sorbent)
. Dioxins/furan s result s ar e presente di n Tabl e 4-2 6 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-2 7 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d Tabl e 4-2 8 fo r

Uni t 4
. Th e concentratio n o f oxyge n measure dusin g CEM S an dEP AMetho d3 A durin g th e secon dhal f

o f the ru n ar

e show n i n the tables , an dth e concentratio n o f dioxins/furan s correcte dto 7 % O 2 i s shown
. Th e analytica l result s fo r th e dioxins/furan s analyse s ar e include di n Appendi x G2
. Result s fo r

dioxins/furan s ar

e converte dto 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-dioxi n toxicit y equivalent s (TEQ)
. Not e tha

t Sectio n §1208(b)(l)(iii ) o f th e HW C MAC T state s tha t non-detect s (al l result s precede db y a"<" ) o f

dioxins/furan s can b e assume dto b e a t zer o concentrations
. Additionally , result s followe db y an "* " ar e denote das Estimate dPossibl e Maximu mConcentrations , an dar e likewis e no t

include di n the calculatio n o f tota l mass .

4-3 4

### Tabl e 4-26 . Uni t 2 - Result s o f Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s
Dat e Tim e Run l 10-8-1 3 15:40-18:5

5 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30-15:4

0 Ru n 5 10-30-1 3 12:45-16:0

2 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 121.16 4 119.56 8 124.92 1 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 10.0 8 10.38 10.5 0 Analyt e Toxicity Equivalen tFactor 1 Mas s Foun d (pg) 2 Analyt e Toxicity Equivalen tFactor 1 PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m 2,3,7,8-TCD D 1 <2.9 3 <3. 6 <6. 5 <2. 8 < 3 <5. 8 <4. 6 <4. 7 <9. 3 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD D 0. 5 <1. 4 7.2 * <8. 6 <1. 6 6. 9 * <8. 5 <2. 1 2 3 * <25. 1 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCD D 0. 1 <1. 2 7. 3 <8. 5 <1. 2 5 <6. 2 <1. 7 2 0 <21. 7 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD D 0. 1 <1. 2 1 4 <15. 2 <1. 2 1 5 <16. 2 <1. 6 3 9 <40. 6 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD D 0. 1 <1. 2 1 2 <13. 2 <1. 2 1 7 <18. 2 <1. 7 4 8 <49. 7 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD D 0.0 1 3. 3 * 4 8 2 85. 3 * 2. 9 9 4 96. 9 < 2 25 0 <25 2 OCD D 0.00 1 9. 1 11 0 119. 1 8. 1 * 12 0 128. 1 * 7. 7 35 0 357. 7 2,3,7,8-TCD F 0. 1 <1. 7 9. 5 <11. 2 < 2 9. 3 <11. 3 < 3 4 9 <5 2 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD F 0.0 5 <1. 1 1 1 * <12. 1 <1. 1 1 2 * <13. 1 <2. 1 7 2 * <74. 1 2,3,4,7,8-PeCD F 0. 5 <1. 2 1 6 <17. 2 <1. 1 1 8 <19. 1 <2. 1 110 * <112. 1 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 <0.6 9 4 1 * <41.6 9 <0.8 2 4 6 * <46.8 2 <1. 1 190 * <191. 1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 <0.6 1 17 * <17.6 1 <0.7 3 1 7 * <17.7 3 < 1 130 * <13 1 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD F 0. 1 <0.7 5 2. 9 <3.6 5 <0.8 9 2. 1 <2.9 9 <1. 2 1 2 <13. 2 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 <0.6 5 1 3 * <13.6 5 <0.7 7 16 * <16.7 7 <1. 1 13 0 <131. 1 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD F 0.0 1 5 * 7 9 84 * 4 8 9 9 3 2.4 * 78 0 782. 4 * 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCD F 0.0 1 <1. 7 1 0 <11. 7 <1. 8 1 2 <13. 8 <1. 7 11 0 <111. 7 OCD F 0.00 1 1 1 * 11 0 12 1 * 1 1 9 8 * 10 9 * 9. 7 630 * 639. 7 *

Tota l Toxicit y Equivalents 0.0091 0 14. 5 14. 5 0.080 0 15. 9 16. 0 0.017 4 41. 6 41. 6 Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dscf ) 0.00012 0 0.00013 4 0.00033 3 Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dscm ) 0.0042 3 0.0047 2 0.011 8 Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 ) 0.0054 3 0.0062 4 0.015 7 Averag e Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dsc m @ 7

% 0 2 ) 0.0091 2

1 Toxi c Equivalenc y Facto r (TEF ) a s develope din : "Interi mProcedur e fo r Estimatin g Risk s Associate dWit hExposure s t o Mixture s o f Chlorinate dDibenzo-p-Dioxi n an d-Dibenzofuran s (CDD s an d CDFs ) an d198 9 Update" , Marc h1989 ; Va n de n Berg , M. , e t al
. "Toxi c Equivalenc y Factor s (TEFs ) fo r PCBs , PCDDs , PCDF s fo r Human s an dWildlife " Environmenta l Healt hPerspectives , Volum e 106 , Numbe r

12 , Decembe r

1998. , a s directe db y th e Preambl e t o th e HW C MACT
.
2Result s followe db y a n "* " are Estimate dMaximu mPossibl e Concentration s (EMPCs)
.
3 I n accordanc e wit hSectio n §1208(b)(l)(iii ) o f th e HW C MACT , non-detect s o f dioxins/furan s are assume dt o b e at zer o concentrations
.
4I n accordanc e wit hth e USEP A Analytica l Service s Branc hdocumen t National Functional

Guidelines for

Chlorinated

Dibenzo—p-Dioxins and Chlorinated

Dibenzofurans Data Review, EMPC s ar e no t include di n th e calculatio n o f TEFs
.



### 4-3 5

### Dioxins/Furan s HW C MAC TSampl e Calculatio n n g TEQ/dsc m @ 7% 0 2 

### (continued )

Uni t 2 - Ru n 1

Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dscf ) =

Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dscf ) = Su m o f al l TE Q Value s (pg ) Sampl e Volum e (dscf ) 14. 5 p g TE Q 121.16 4 dsc f 1 n g
10 3p g 1 n g 10 3 p g 0.00012 0

Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dscm ) =
Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dscm ) = Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dscf )
0.00012 0 35.31 5 dscf 1 dsc m 35.31 5 dsc f 1 dsc m 0.0042 3

Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 )

Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 ) Concentratio n

(n g TEQ/dscm ) 0.0042 3 (21%-7% )

(21%-Meas
. Q 2 ) (2 1 - 7 ) 0.0054 3 (2 1 -10.08 )



### 4-3 6

### Tabl e 4-27 . Uni t 3 - Result s o f Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s
Date Tim e Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 14:00-17:2

0 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:30-15:5

5 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:35-12:50 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 106.30 3 102.72 4 102.62 4 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 11.1 9 10.7 2 10.8 7 Analyt e Toxicit y Equivalen tFactor 1 Mas s Foun d (pg) 2 Analyt e Toxicit y Equivalen tFactor 1 PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m 2,3,7,8-TCD D 1 <0.14 3 1. 1 * <1.2 4 <0. 7 3. 8 * <4. 5 <0.2 9 1. 9 * <2.1 9 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD D 0. 5 0.2 3 4. 8 * 5.0 3 * 1.4 * 12 * 13.4 * <0.1 5 5 * <5.1 5 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCD D 0. 1 <0.1 5 2. 6 <2.7 5 <0. 7 4. 1 * <4. 8 <0.4 2 3 <3.4 2 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD D 0. 1 0.2 2 * 4 5. 3 5.52 * <0.6 7 1 1 * <11.6 7 <0. 4 5. 1 * <5. 5 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD D 0. 1 0.4 1 * 5. 6 6.0 1 * 1. 5 * 12 * 13. 5 * 1.4 * 8. 1 9. 5 * 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD D 0.0 1 1. 5 * 2 9 30. 5 * 1.6 * 5 7 58. 6 * 1. 9 2 9 30. 9 OCD D 0.00 1 7. 7 * 3 7 44. 7 * 1 2 4 0 5 2 5.6 * 2 8 33. 6 * 2,3,7,8-TCD F 0. 1 0.2 9 6. 8 * 7.09 * <0.4 7 1 4 <14.4 7 <0.2 9 1 1 <11.2 9 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD F 0.0 5 <0.1 1 9. 1 * <9.2 1 <0.7 8 2 0 * <20.7 8 <0.3 1 12 * <12.3 1 2,3,4,7,8-PeCD F 0. 5 <0.1 1 1 9 * <19.1 1 <0.7 8 3 6 * <36.7 8 <0.3 1 2 7 * <27.3 1 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 0.4 8 * 2 5 * 25.4 8 * 2. 5 * 6 1 * 63. 5 * 0.62 * 2 6 * 26.6 2 * 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 0.22 * 1 1 * 11.22 * <0.5 7 2 3 * <23.5 7 0.2 9 * 12 * 12.2 9 * 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD F 0. 1 0. 7 0.9 * 1. 6 * 1.4 * 2.4 * 3.8 * 0.56 * 1.2 * 1.7 6 * 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 0.4 2 * 1 1 * 11.42 * 1. 3 * 2 1 * 22.3 * 0.5 5 * 1 2 * 12.5 5 * 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD F 0.0 1 1. 1 * 2 8 29. 1 * <0.6 3 4 3 <43.6 3 0.7 8 * 2 2 22.7 8 * 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCD F 0.0 1 0.4 8 * 3. 8 * 4.2 8 * 1.9 * 5 * 6.9 * 0.66 * 4. 4 5.0 6 * OCD F 0.00 1 3. 8 8. 5 * 12. 3 * 5. 8 9.7 * 15. 5 * 4. 7 5.7 * 10.4 *

Tota l Toxicit y Equivalents 0.21 8 1.9 6 2.1 7 0.017 8 2.4 4 2.4 6 0.023 7 2.7 9 2.8 2 Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dscf ) 0.000020 5 0.000023 9 0.000027 4 Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dscm ) 0.00072 2 0.00084 5 0.00096 9 Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 ) 0.0010 3 0.0011 5 0.0013 4 Averag e Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dsc m @ 7 % Q 2 ) 0.0011 8

1 Toxi c Equivalenc y Facto r (TEF ) a s develope din : "Interi mProcedur e fo r Estimatin g Risk s Associate dWit hExposure s t o Mixture s o f Chlorinate dDibenzo-p-Dioxi n an d-Dibenzofuran s (CDD s an d CDFs ) an d198 9 Update" , Marc h1989 ; Va n de n Berg , M. , et al
. "Toxi c Equivalenc y Factor s (TEFs ) fo r PCBs , PCDDs , PCDF s fo r Human s an dWildlife " Environmenta l Healt hPerspectives , Volum e 106 , Numbe r

12 , Decembe r

1998. , a s directe db y th e Preambl e t o th e HW C MACT
.
2Result s followe db y a n "* " ar e Estimate dMaximu mPossibl e Concentration s (EMPCs)
.
3 I n accordanc e wit hSectio n §1208(b)(l)(iii ) o f th e HW C MACT , non-detect s o f dioxins/furan s are assume dt o b e at zer o concentrations
.
4I n accordanc e wit hth e USEP A Analytica l Service s Branc hdocumen t National Functional

Guidelines for

Chlorinated

Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Chlorinated

Dibenzofurans Data Review, EMPC s ar e no t include di n th e calculatio n o f TEFs
.



### 4-3 7

### Tabl e 4-28 . Uni t 4 - Result s o f Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s
Dat e Tim e Ru n 1 10-23-1 3 12:36-15:50 Ru n 2 10-24-1 3 12:35-15:4

5 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 13:35-16:4 1 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 110.79 1 112.80 3 115.28 4 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 12.2 7 12.3 7 12.0 0 Analyt e Toxicit y Equivalen tFactor 1 Mas s Foun d (pg) 2 Analyt e Toxicit y Equivalen tFactor 1 PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m 2,3,7,8-TCD D 1 <4.9 3 7 * <11. 9 <4.3 ' 9. 5 * <13. 8 <2. 5 8.2 * <10. 7 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD D 0. 5 <1. 9 120 * <121. 9 <2. 2 12 0 * <122. 2 2 120 * 12 2 * 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCD D 0. 1 < 2 23 0 <23 2 4. 3 23 0 234. 3 3.9 * 23 0 233. 9 * 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD D 0. 1 1 3 * 4 99 0 100 3 * 9. 4 * 93 0 939. 4 * 1 6 94 0 95 6 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD D 0. 1 10 * 64 0 650 * 12 * 65 0 662 * 1 2 63 0 64 2 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD D 0.0 1 16 0 610 0 626 0 13 0 550 0 563 0 16 0 590 0 606 0 OCD D 0.00 1 17 0 360 0 377 0 15 0 350 0 365 0 19 0 410 0 429 0 2,3,7,8-TCD F 0. 1 3. 8 * 7 8 81. 8 * <2. 9 7 0 <72. 9 3.6 * 7 0 73. 6 * 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD F 0.0 5 < 2 13 0 * <13 2 <2. 1 120 * <122. 1 <1. 2 11 0 * <111. 2 2,3,4,7,8-PeCD F 0. 5 4. 5 * 55 0 * 554. 5 * <2. 2 510 * <512. 2 4.7 * 430 * 434. 7 * 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 4.7 * 57 0 * 574. 7 * 5 510 * 51 5 * 3.6 * 26 0 263. 6 * 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 2. 3 * 310 * 312. 3 * 2. 7 * 29 0 * 292. 7 * 2.6 * 30 0 * 302. 6 * 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD F 0. 1 <1. 3 3 9 * <40. 3 <1. 4 3 8 * <39. 4 <0.8 2 4 3 * <43.8 2 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 7.9 * 600 * 607. 9 * 6. 9 510 * 516.9 * 8.4 * 560 * 568. 4 * 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD F 0.0 1 1 5 76 0 77 5 10 * 71 0 72 0 * 1 7 72 0 73 7 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCD F 0.0 1 4. 1 * 18 0 184. 1 * 3.5 * 16 0 163. 5 * 5. 9 * 20 0 205. 9 * OCD F 0.00 1 12 * 140 * 152 * 10 * 14 0 150 * 1 1 * 160 * 17 1 *

Tota l Toxicit y Equivalents 1.9 2 26 8 27 0 3.0 7 25 5 25 8 5.7 6 28 5 29 1 Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dscf ) 0.0024 3 0.0022 9 0.0025 2 Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dscm ) 0.086 0 0.080 9 0.089 2 Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 ) 0.13 8 0.13 2 0.13 9 Averag e Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dsc m @ 7 % Q 2 ) 0.13 7

1 Toxi c Equivalenc y Facto r (TEF ) a s develope din : "jriteri mProcedur e fo r Estimatin g Risk s Associate dWit hExposure s t o Mixture s o f Chlorinate dDibenzo-p-Dioxi n an d-Dibenzofuran s (CDD s an d CDFs ) an d198 9 Update" , Marc h1989 ; Va n de n Berg , M. , et al
. "Toxi c Equivalenc y Factor s (TEFs ) fo r PCBs , PCDDs , PCDF s fo r Human s an dWildlife " Environmenta l Healt hPerspectives , Volum e 106 , Numbe r 12 , Decembe r

1998. , a s directe db y th e Preambl e t o th e HW C MACT
.
2Result s followe db y a n "* " ar e Estimate dMaximu mPossibl e Concentration s (EMPCs)
.
3 I n accordanc e wit hSectio n §1208(b)(l)(iii ) o f th e HW C MACT , non-detect s o f dioxins/furan s are assume dt o b e at zer o concentrations
. I naccordanc e wit hth e USEP A Analytica l Service s Branc hdocumen t National Functional

Guidelines for

Chlorinated

Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Chlorinated

Dibenzofurans Data Review, EMPC s are no t include di n th e calculatio n o f TEFs
.



### 4-3 8

### 4.2. 5 TH C i n Stac k Ga s Tota l hydrocarbon s (THC ) were monitore di n th e stac k ga s usin g EP AMetho d25A
. TH C wa s monitore dthroughou t th e secon dhal f

o f eac hrun . Stac k

gas concentration s o f

TH C ar e presente di n Tabl e 4-2 9 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-3 0 fo r

Uni t 3 , an dTabl e 4-3 1 fo r

Uni t 4
. Th e concentratio n o f

oxyge n measure dusin g CEM S an dEP AMetho d3 Adurin g th e secon dhal f o f th e ru n ar

e show n i n the tables , an dth e concentratio n o f TH C correcte dto 7 % O 2 i s shown
. Tabl e 4-29 . Uni t 2 - Result s fo r TH C i n Stac k Ga s Dat e Tim e Run l 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -18:5 5 Ru

n 3 10-10-1 3 12:3 0 -15:4 0 Ru

n 5 10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -16:0 2 TH C (ppmv

, wet , a s propane

) 0.6 8 0.0 7 0.2 1 Moistur e (% ) 44. 7 45. 3 42. 9 TH C (ppmv

, dry , a s propane

) 1.

2 0.1 3 0.3 7 Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 10.0 8 10.3 8 10.5 0 TH C (ppmv

, dry, a s propane

, correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 1.

6 0.1 8 0.49 Averag e TH C (ppmv

, dry, a s propane

, correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.7 5


### TH C HW C MAC TSampl e Calculatio n ppmv d @ 7 % 0 2 

### (continued ) Unit2-Ru n 5
TH C Concentratio n 1 TH C Concentratio n (ppmvd ) = X (PP mv ) ( 1 - ( % Moistur

e /100%)) 1 TH C Concentratio n (ppmvd ) = 0.2 1 ppmvX = 0.3 7 ( 1 - (42.9 % / 100%) )

TH C Concentratio n ( 2 1 %" 7 % ) TH C Concentratio n (ppmvd) = X (PP mvd ) (21 % - Meas . 0 2 ) (21-7 ) TH C Concentratio n (ppmvd) = 0.3 7 X = 0.4 9 (21-10.50 )



### 4-3 9

### Tabl e 4-30 . Uni t 3 - Result s fo r TH C i n Stac k Ga s Ru n 2 Ru

n 3 Run 4 Dat e 10-16-1

3 10-17-1

3 10-18-1

3 Tim e 14:0 0 -17:2 0 12:3 0 -15:5 5 09:3 5 -12:5 0 TH C (ppmv

, wet , a s propane

) 0.1 8 0.1 1 0.2 3 Moistur e (% ) 42. 9 44. 4 43. 7 TH C (ppmv

, dry , a s propane

) 0.3 1 0.1 9 0.4 1 Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 11.1 9 10.7 2 10.87 TH C (ppmv

, dry, a s propane

, correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.4

4 0.26 0.5 7 Averag e TH C (ppmv

, dry, a s propane

, correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.43



### Tabl e 4-31 . Uni t 4 - Result s fo r TH C i n Stac k Ga s Run l Ru

n 2 Run 3 Dat e 10-23-1

3 10-24-1

3 10-25-1

3 Tim e 12:3 6 -15:5 0 12:3 5 -15:4 5 13:3 5 -16:4 1 TH C (ppmv

, wet , a s propane

) 0.1 9 0.23 0.3 3 Moistur e (% ) 39. 2 38. 3 39. 3 TH C (ppmv

, dry , a s propane

) 0.3 2 0.3 7 0.5 4 Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 12.2

7 12.3 7 12.0 0 TH C (ppmv

, dry, a s propane

, correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.5 1 0.6 0 0.8 5 Averag e TH C (ppmv

, dry, a s propane

, correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.6 5



### 4-4 04. 3 Chlorine , Ash , an d Metal s Feedrate s Thi s sectio n present s calculate dvalue s usin g th e analytica l result s presente dpreviously , waste feedrates , an dspikin g feedrates
. Feedrate s ar e calculate dfor :

• Tota l Chlorine/Chloride ;

• Ash ; an d

• Metals
. I n thos e circumstance s where aconstituen t i s no t detecte di n awaste fee d(i.e. , i s no t analyze dabov e th e detectio n limit) , the concentratio n o f tha t parameter

i s treate da

s zer o "0 " i n th e calculatio n o f

th e feedrate o f

tha t constituen t

tha t become s an OP Lfo r

tha t parameter . 4.3. 1 Chlorin e Feedrat e Feedrate o f

tota l chlorin e an dchlorid e (i.e. , chlorine ) i s an OP Lfo r th e emissio n standard s fo r

hydroge n chlorid e an dchlorin e ga s (HCI/CI2 ) an dfo r SV M an dLVM
. Th e feedrat e o f chlorin e ha s bee n determine ddurin g bothth e HCI/CI 2 an dmetal s (i.e. , SV M an dLVM ) stac k samplin g i n th e secon dpar t o f eac hrun . Tabl e 4-3 2 present s the chlorin e feedrate s calculate d durin g bothth e HC1/CI 2 an dmetal s stac k samplin g fo r

Uni t 2
. Chlorin e feedrate s fo r Uni t 3 ar e presente di n Tabl e 4-33 , an dchlorin e feedrate s fo r Uni t 4 ar e presente di n Tabl e 4-34
. Fo r th e calculatio n o f

the chlorin e feedrate , th e weigh t o f the Containerize dSoli dWast e use dt o calculat e th e feedrate s o f chlorin e wa s reducedb y th e weigh t o f th e box , an dth e spikin g material s lea dnitrate , hexachloroethane , an dth e solutio n o f mercuri c nitrat e to determin e the feedrat e o f

Containerize dSoli dWast e tha t wa s analyze dfo r

chlorine
. 4.3. 2 As h Feedrat e Feedrat e o f

as hi s a n OP Lfo r

th e emissio n standardfo r particulat e matter . Th e feedrate o f as hha s bee n determine ddurin g th e particulat e matter stac k samplin g i n th e firs t

par t o f eac hrun . Tabl e 4-3 5 present s the as hfeedrat e calculate ddurin g stac k samplin g fo r

particulat e matter

fo r Uni t 2
. As hfeedrate s fo r

Uni t 3 ar e presente di n Tabl e 4-36 , an das hfeedrate s fo r Uni t 4 ar e presente di n Tabl e 4-37
.

4-4 1

### Tabl e 4-32 . Uni t 2 - Chlorin e Feedrate HCI/C1 2Stac k Samplin g Metal s Stac k Samplin g Run l 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -16:4 0 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 12:3 0 -13:3 0 Ru n 5

10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -13:4 5 Run l

10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -18:4 3 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 12:30 -15:1 0 Ru n 5

10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -15:3 2
Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,422. 1 1,500. 9 1,451. 9 1,474. 6 1,513. 3 1,396. 5 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 34 0 40 4 34 0 34 7 36 4 35 7 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.4 8 0.6 1 0.4 9 0.5 1 0.5 5 0.5 0 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,370. 8 1,098. 7 1,200. 0 1,289. 1 1,098. 9 1,164. 6 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 6,96 0 3,26 0 3,50 0 7,14 0 3,21 0 3,58 0 High-Bt Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 9.5 4 3.5 8 4.2 0 9.2 0 3.5 3 4.1 7 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 485. 9 398. 2 440. 8 432. 6 425. 4 445. 3 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 10 5 13 0 10 6 15 9 12 4 92. 4 Specialt Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.0 5 0.0 5 0.0 5 0.0 7 0.0 5 0.0 4 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 540. 0 534. 3 535. 7 547. 0 536. 1 542. 4 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 18 4 34 5 34 6 16 7 49 9 39 6 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.1 0 0.1 8 0.1 9 0.0 9 0.2 7 0.2 1 Chlorin e Spikin g Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 197. 9 203. 1 197. 9 199. 7 199. 2 200. 2 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrate (lb/hr ) 208. 0 207. 5 202. 8 209. 6 203. 6 205. 1 Averag e Chlorin e Feedrate (lb/hr ) 206. 1 206. 1 Th e weigh t

o f th e Containerize dSoli dWast e use dt o calculat e th e feedrate s o f chlorin e an dmetal s ha s bee n reduce db y th e weigh t o f th e box , an dth e spikin g material s lea dnitrate , hexachloroethane , an dth e solutio n o f mercuri c nitrate
.



### 4-4 2

### Tabl e 4-33 . Uni t 3 - Chlorin e Feedrate HC1/C1 2Stac k Samplin g Metal s Stac k Samplin g Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 10-16-1 3 10-17-1 3 10-18-1 3 10-16-1 3 10-17-1 3 10-18-1 3 14:0 0 -15:0 0 12:3

0 -13:3 3 09:35 -10:3 5 14:0 0 -16:5 0 12:3

0 -15:2 5 09:35 -12:2 0 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,783. 5 1,563. 4 1,725. 3 1,787. 6 1,685. 3 1,707. 4 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 56 3 40 9 38 8 41 9 42 9 40 8 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 1.00 0.6 4 0.6 7 0.7 5 0.7 2 0.7 0 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 977. 2 1,151. 9 1,163. 5 1,043. 9 1,166. 5 1,197. 7 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 2,46 0 1,69 0 1,91 0 2,72 0 1,65 0 1,81 0 High-Bt Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 2.4 0 1.9 5 2.2 2 2.8 4 1.9 2 2.1 7 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 177. 5 407. 7 248. 8 202. 9 350. 0 244. 8 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 1,48 0 10 1 11 3 69 6 12 5 12 7 Specialt Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.2 6 0.0 4 0.0 3 0.1 4 0.0 4 0.0 3 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 550. 6 539. 6 516. 5 541. 9 536. 5 523. 9 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 48 2 11 5 38 2 19 5 27 1 25 5 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.2 7 0.0 6 0.2 0 0.1 1 0.1 5 0.1 3 Chlorin e Spikin g Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 203. 1 203. 3 197. 9 200. 3 201. 7 200. 7 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrate (Ib/hr ) 207.0 206.0 201.0 204.2 204. 6 203.7 Averag e Chlorin e Feedrate (lb/hr ) 204.7 204.2

1 Th e weigh t

o f th e Containerize dSoli dWast e use dt o calculat e th e feedrate s o f chlorin e an dmetal s ha s bee n reduce db y th e weigh t o f th e box , an dth e spikin g material s lea dnitrate , hexachloroethane , an dth e solutio n o f mercuri c nitrate
.



### 4-4 3

### Tabl e 4-34 . Uni t 4 - Chlorin e Feedrate HCI/CI 2Stack Samplin g Metal s Stac k Samplin g Run l 10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -13:3 6 Ru n 2

10-24-1 3 12:3 5 -13:3 5 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -14:3 5 Run l

10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -15:2 0 Ru n 2

10-24-1 3 12:3 5 -15:1 5 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 13:35-16:1 1
Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil n Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,943. 7 1,996. 5 1,999. 6 1,978. 5 1,986. 6 1,999. 0 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil n Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 41 6 46 7 48 6 41 3 39 3 53 2 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.8 1 0.9 3 0.9 7 0.8 2 0.7 8 1.0 6 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil n Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,167. 0 1,205. 4 1,201. 0 1,189. 2 1,201. 2 1,201. 8 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil n Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 1,45 0 1,39 0 1,36 0 1,49 0 1,36 0 1,35 0 High-Bt Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 1.6 9 1.6 8 1.6 3 1.7 7 1.6 3 1.6 2 Liqui dWast e t o SC C Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1165. 6 1203. 1 1196. 3 1186. 2 1201. 5 1196. 2 Liqui dWast e t o SC C Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 1,23 0 1,26 0 1,28 0 1,25 0 2,50 0 1,25 0 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 1.4 3 1.5 2 1.5 3 1.4 8 3.0 0 1.5 0 Containerize dSoh dWaste 1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 515. 3 512. 3 498. 3 514. 2 505. 4 507. 6 Containerize dSoh dWaste 1 Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 19 2 20 5 20 7 19 0 20 1 18 0 Containerize dSoh dWaste 1 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.1 0 0.1 1 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.0 9 Bul k Soli dWast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 6,093. 0 5,448. 0 5,739. 0 5,251. 5 5,598. 4 5,345. 0 Bul k Soli dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 18 4 25 7 19 1 21 9 24 3 17 3 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 1.1 2 1.40 1.1 0 1.1 5 1.3 6 0.9 2 Chlorin e Spikin g Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 197. 9 197. 9 197. 9 200. 0 197. 2 200. 3 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrate (lb/hr ) 203. 0 203.5 203.2 205.3 204. 1 205. 5 Averag e Chlorin e Feedrate (lb/hr ) 203.2 205. 0

1 Th e weigh t

o f th e Containerize dSoh dWast e use dt o calculat e th e feedrate s o f chlorin e an dmetal s ha s bee n reduce db y th e weigh t o f th e box , an dth e spikin g material s lea dnitrate , hexachloroethane , an dth e solutio n o f mercuri c nitrat e



### 4-4 4

### Tabl e 4-35 . Uni t 2 - As h Feedrate Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M Run l 10-8-1 3 11:5 0 -13:0 0 Ru

n 2 10-9-1 3 09:4 5 -10:5 3 Run 3 10-10-1 3 09:4 5 -10:5 3
Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 1,277. 2 1,353. 3 1,288. 3 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e As hConcentration (mg/kg) 3,140 2,960 3,25 0 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e As hFeedrat e (lb/hr ) 4.0 1 4.0 1 4.1 9 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 1,000. 2 997. 7 998. 5 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e As hConcentration (mg/kg) 1,350 1,01 0 1,18 0 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e As hFeedrat e (lb/hr ) 1.35 1.0 1 1.1 8 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 270. 8 256. 5 296. 7 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e As hConcentration (mg/kg) 64

9 59 9 59 8 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e As hFeedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.1 8 0.1 5 0.1 8
Containerize dSoli dWast e Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 734. 9 738. 4 746. 0 Containerize dSoli dWast e As hConcentration

(mg/kg) 675,000 688,000 655,000 Containerize dSoli dWast e As hFeedrat

e (lb/hr ) 496. 1 508. 0 488. 6 Tota l As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 501.

6 513.

2 494.

2 Averag e As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 503. 0



### 4-4 5

### Tabl e 4-36 . Uni t 3 - As h Feedrate Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M Run l 10-15-1 3 13:1 6 -14:2 5 Ru

n 2 10-16-1 3 11:1 5 -12:2 5 Ru

n 3 10-17-1 3 09:5 0 -10:5 7 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 1,292. 9 955. 4 1,357. 6 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e As hConcentration (mg/kg ) 3,09 0 4,07 0 3,65 0

As hFeedrat

e (lb/hr ) 4.00 3.89 4.9 6 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 847. 9 818. 2 875. 3 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e As hConcentration (mg/kg ) 1,26 0 93 7 59 9 High-Bt As hFeedrat e (lb/hr ) 1.0

7 0.7 7 0.5 2 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 307. 9 269. 1 457. 4 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e As hConcentration (mg/kg ) 59 1 622 58 8 Specialt As hFeedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.1 8 0.1 7 0.2 7 Containerize dSoli dWast e Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 738. 3 742. 1 720. 7 Containerize dSoli dWast e As hConcentration (mg/kg ) 670,000 682,000 778,000 Containerize As hFeedrat e (lb/hr ) 494. 7 506. 1 560. 7 Tota l As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 499. 9 510.

9 566.

5 Averag e As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 525. 8



### 4-4 6

### Tabl e 4-37 . Uni t 4 - As h Feedrate Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M Run l 10-23-1 3 09:3 0 -10:4 2 Ru

n 3 10-25-1 3 09:3 5 -10:4 0 Ru

n 4 10-25-1 3 10:5 0 -11:5 5
Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,899. 6 1,901. 0 1,896. 8 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e As hConcentration (mg/kg) 2,79 0 3,32 0 3,25 0 As hFeedrat

e (lb/hr ) 5.3 0 6.3 1 6.1 6 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,101. 4 1,098. 1 1,108. 9 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e As hConcentration (mg/kg ) 1,61 0 1,50 0 98 9 High-Bt As hFeedrat e (lb/hr ) 1.7

7 1.6

5 1.1 0 Liqui dWast

e t o SC C Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,095. 6 1,100. 7 1,102. 8 Liqui dWast

e t o SC C As hConcentration (mg/kg) 74 4 78 7 74 3 As hFeedrat

e (lb/hr ) 0.8 2 0.87 0.8 2 Containerize dSoli dWast e Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 565. 8 568. 6 553. 8 Containerize dSoli dWast e As hConcentration (mg/kg) 758,000 724,000 771,000 Containerize As hFeedrat e (lb/hr ) 428. 9 411. 7 427. 0 Bul k Soli dWast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 6,286. 7 6,408. 0 5,992. 6 Bul k Soli dWast

e As hConcentration (mg/kg ) 695,000 689,000 710,000

As hFeedrat

e (lb/hr ) 4,369. 2 4,415. 1 4,254. 8 Tota l As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 4,806.

0 4,835.

6 4,689.

9 Averag e As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 4,777. 2



### 4-4 7

### 4.3. 3 Metal s Feedrate s

Feedrate s o f

th e metal s regulate db y th e HW C MAC T (As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , an dHg ) are OPL s fo r

th e emissio n standard s fo r SVM , LVM , an dmercury . Th e feedrate s o f thes e si x metal s hav e bee n determine ddurin g the metal s stac k samplin g i n th e secon dpar t o f eac hrun . Th e stac k ga s concentration s o f

al l si x o f

the HW C MAC T metal s ar e determine db y EP AMetho d29
. Tabl e 4-3 8 present s th e feedrate s o f thes e metal s calculate ddurin g stac k samplin g fo r

metal s fo r Uni t 2
. Metal s feedrate s fo r Uni t 3 ar e presente di n Tabl e 4-40 , an dmetal s feedrate s fo r Uni t 4 are presente di n Tabl e 4-42. Th e OPL s fo r

metal s feedrate s are tota l LV M feedrat e (i.e. , tota l an dpumpable ) an d pumpabl e LV M fo r

th e emissio n standardfo r LV M (i.e. , arsenic , beryllium , an dchromium) ; (Total ) SV M feedrat e (i.e. , tota l an dpumpable ) fo r th e emissio n standardfo r SV M (i.e. , cadmiu man dlead) ; an d(Total ) mercur y feedrate (i.e. , tota l an dpumpable ) fo r th e emissio n standardfo r

mercury . Tabl e 4-3 9 present s the feedrate s o f tota l LV M an dpumpabl e LVM , tota l SVM , an dmercur y calculate ddurin g stac k samplin g fo r

metal s fo r

Uni t 2
. Tota l LV M an d pumpabl e LVM , tota l SVM , an dmercur y feedrate s fo r Uni t 3 ar e presente di n Tabl e 4-41 , an d tota l LV M an dpumpabl e LVM , tota l SVM , an dmercur y feedrate s fo r Uni t 4 ar e presente di n Tabl e 4-43
. Fo r th e calculatio n o f

the metal s feedrates , th e weigh t o f th e containerize dsoli dwaste use dto calculat e th e feedrate s o f metal s wa s reduce db y th e weigh t o f th e box , an dth e spikin g material s lea dnitrate , hexachloroethane , an dth e solutio n o f mercuri c nitrate to determin e th e feedrat e o f

containerize dsoli dwaste tha t wa s analyze dfo r

th e metal s As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , an d Hg
.

4-4 8

### Tabl e 4-38 . Uni t 2 - Metal s Feedrate s Run l Ru n 3 Ru n 5 10-8-1 3 10-10-1 3 10-30-1 3 15:4 0 -18:4 3 12:30 -15:1 0 12:4 5 -15:3 2 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,47 5 1,51 3 1,39 6 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 2. 7 3. 2 2. 1 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 7 <0.09 6 <0.09 7 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 7. 2 9 7 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0. 8 0.8 8 0.7 4 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 1. 1 1. 7 1. 1 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.02 1 0.04 2 0.05 2 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0039 8 0.0048 4 0.0029 3 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001 4 <0.0001 5 <0.0001 4 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.010 6 0.013 6 0.0097 8 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0011 8 0.0013 3 0.0010 3 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0016 2 0.0025 7 0.0015 4 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000031 0 0.000063 6 0.000072 6

Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,28 9 1,09 9 1,16 5 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 8. 3 2. 8 <0.3 2 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 6 <0.09 9 <0.09 6 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.07 6 <0.07 8 <0.07 6 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.2 6 <0.2 2 <0.2 1 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 1 0.6 7 6. 7 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.02 6 0.02 1 0.09 6 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.010 7 0.0030 8 <0.0003 7 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001 2 <0.0001 1 <0.0001 1 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00009 8 <0.00008 6 <0.00008 9 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00033 5 <0.0002 4 <0.0002 4 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0012 9 0.00073 6 0.0078 0 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000033 5 0.000023 1 0.00011 2

Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 43 3 42 5 44 5 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) <0.3 2 <0. 3 <0.3 1 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 6 <0.09 2 <0.09 3 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.07 6 <0.07 3 <0.07 3 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.2 1 <0. 2 <0. 2 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) <0.2 7 <0.2 6 <0.2 6 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Mercur y Con e (mg/k g <0.00 9 <0.008 6 <0.009 9 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001 4 <0.0001 3 <0.0001 4 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00004 2 <0.00003 9 <0.00004 1 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00003 3 <0.00003 1 <0.00003 3 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00009 1 <0.00008 5 <0.00008 9 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001 2 <0.0001 1 <0.0001 2 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.000003 9 <0.000003 7 <0.000004 4

Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 54 7 53 6 54 2 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 8. 8 7. 5 8. 8 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.4 8 0.6 1 0.7 3 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.08 2 <0.07 7 0.08 4 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 12. 8 19. 3 16. 7 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 11. 6 11. 7 13. 5 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.04 5 0.02 2 0.01 6 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0048 1 0.0040 2 0.0047 7 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00026 3 0.00032 7 0.00039 6 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000044 9 <0.00004 1 0.000045 6 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0070 0 0.010 3 0.0090 6 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0063 5 0.0062 7 0.0073 2 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000024 6 0.000011 8 0.0000086 8



### 4-4 9

### Tabl e 4-38 . (continued ) Uni t 2 - Metal s Feedrate s Run l 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -18:4 3 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 12:30 -15:1 0 Ru n 5

10-30-13 12:4 5 -15:3 2
Spikin g Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 45. 8 47. 3 45. 8 Spikin g Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 61. 9 61. 7 62. 0 Spikin g Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0019 6 0.0019 6 0.0020 4
Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.014 7 0.0079 2 0.0029 3 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.010 6 0.013 6 0.0097 8 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 45. 8 47. 3 45. 9 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0029 1 0.0033 1 0.0093 4 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2
Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000064 5 0.000086 6 0.00018 4

Tota l Feedrate 2 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.019 5 0.011 9 0.0077 1
Tota l Feedrate 2 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00026 3 0.00032 7 0.00039 6 Tota l Feedrate 2 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.010 7 0.013 6 0.0098 2 Tota l Feedrate 2 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 45. 8 47. 3 45. 9 Tota l Feedrate 2 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 61. 9 61. 7 62. 0 Tota l Feedrate 2
Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0020 5 0.0020 6 0.0022 4

1 Th e weigh t

o f th e Containerize dSoli dWast e use dto calculat e the feedrate s o f chlorin e an dmetal s ha s been reduce db y th e weigh t

o f th e box , an dth e spikin g material s lea dnitrate , hexachloroethane , an dth e solutio n o f mercuri c nitrate
.
2Non-detect s treate das azer o "0"
.



### 4-5 0

### Tabl e 4-39 . Uni t 2 - HWC MAC TMetal s Feedrate s
Units Run l

10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -18:4 3 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 12:3 0 -15:1 0 Ru n 5

10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -15:3 2 Averag e Arseni c (Total ) lb/h r 0.019 5 0.011 9 0.007 7 0.013 0 Berylliu m(Total ) lb/h r 0.0002 6 0.0003 3 0.0004 0 0.0003 3 Chromiu m(Total ) lb/h r 45. 8 47. 3 45. 9 46.3 Tota l LV M (Arsenic , Beryllium ,

Chromium ) lb/h r 45. 9 47.3 45. 9 46. 3 Arseni c (Pumpable ) lb/h r 0.014 7 0.007 9 0.002 9 0.008 5 Berylliu m(Pumpable ) lb/h r 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 Chromiu m(Pumpable ) lb/h r 45. 8 47. 3 45. 9 46.3 Pumpabl e LV M (Arsenic , Beryllium , Chromium ) lb/h r 45. 9 47.3 45. 9 46. 3 Cadmiu m lb/h r 0.010 7 0.013 6 0.009 8 0.011 4 Lea d lb/h r 61. 9 61. 7 62. 0 61. 9

Tota l SV M (Cadmium , Lead ) lb/h r 61. 9 61.7 62.0 61.9

Mercur y lb/h r 0.0020 5 0.0020

6 0.0022

4 0.00212



### 4-5 1

### Tabl e 4-40 . Uni t 3 - Metal s Feedrate s Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 10-16-1 3 10-17-1 3 10-18-13 14:0 0 -16:5 0 12:3

0 -15:2 5 09:3

5 -12:20 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,78 8 1,68 5 1,70 7 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 4. 8 3. 2 3. 3 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 6 <0.09 7 <0.09 6 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 15. 2 9. 4 11. 3 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 1. 3 0.8 7 0.9 7 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 3. 1 1. 9 1. 9 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.06 5 0.04 9 0.0 8 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0085 8 0.0053 9 0.0056 3 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001 7 <0.0001 6 <0.0001 6 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.027 2 0.015 8 0.019 3 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0023 2 0.0014 7 0.0016 6 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0055 4 0.0032 0 0.0032 4 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00011 6 0.000082 6 0.00013 7

Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,044 1,16 7 1,19 8 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 12. 4 1. 7 2. 4 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 5 <0. 1 <0.09 6 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.07 5 <0.07 9 <0.07 6 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.2 1 <0.2 2 <0.2 1 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 1. 8 1 1. 3 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.02 7 0.02 9 0.02 2 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.012 9 0.0019 8 0.0028 7 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00009 9 <0.0001 2 <0.0001 1 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00007 8 <0.00009 2 <0.00009 1 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.0002 2 <0.0002 6 <0.0002 5 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0018 8 0.0011 7 0.0015 6 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000028 2 0.000033 8 0.000026 3

Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 20 3 35 0 24 5 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) <0.3 2 <0.3 2 <0.3 3 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 8 <0.09 6 <0.09 9 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.07 7 <0.07 6 <0.07 8 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.2 2 <0.2 1 <0.2 2 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) <0.2 7 <0.2 7 <0.2 8 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Mercur y Con e (mg/k g <0.008 8 <0.009 4 <0.009 9 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00006 5 <0.0001 1 <0.00008 1 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00002 0 <0.00003 4 <0.00002 4 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00001 6 <0.00002 7 <0.00001 9 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00004 5 <0.00007 3 <0.00005 4 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00005 5 <0.00009 4 <0.00006 9 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.000001 8 <0.000003 3 <0.000002 4

Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 54 2 53 7 52 4 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 7. 5 6. 4 8. 4 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.5 8 0.5 5 0.7 9 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.07 1 <0.07 6 <0.07 1 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 13. 6 13. 7 18. 9 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 11. 1 10. 7 14. 1 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.02 8 0.02 8 0.02 6 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0040 6 0.0034 3 0.0044 0 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00031 4 0.00029 5 0.00041 4 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00003 8 <0.00004 1 <0.00003 7 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0073 7 0.0073 5 0.0099 0 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0060 1 0.0057 4 0.00739 3 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000015 2 0.000015 0 0.000013 6



### 4-5 2

### Tabl e 4-40 . (continued ) Uni t 3 - Metal s Feedrate s Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 10-16-1 3 10-17-1 3 10-18-1 3 14:0 0 -16:5 0 12:3

0 -15:2 5 09:35 -12:2 0 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 46.3 46. 1 45. 7 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 62. 1 62. 5 62. 2 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0020 4 0.0020 0 0.0020 9 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.021 5 0.0073 8 0.0085 1 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.027 2 0.015 8 0.019 3 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 46.3 46. 1 45. 7 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0074 2 0.0043 7 0.0048 0 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00014 4 0.00011 6 0.00016 3 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.025 6 0.010 8 0.012 9 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00031 4 0.00029 5 0.00041 4 Tota l Feedrate 2 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.027 2 0.015 8 0.019 3 Tota l Feedrate 2 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 46.3 46. 1 45. 7 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 62. 1 62. 5 62. 2 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0022 0 0.0021 3 0.0022 6

1 Th e weigh t

o f th e Containerize dSoli dWast e use dt o calculat e th e feedrate s o f chlorin e an dmetal s ha s bee n reduce db y th e weigh t o f th e box , an dth e spikin g material s lea dnitrate , hexachloroethane , an dth e solutio n o f mercuri c mtrate .

2Non-detect s treate da s azer o "0"
.



### Tabl e 4-41 . Uni t 3 - HWC MAC TMetal s Feedrate s
Unit s Ru n 2

10-16-1 3 14:0 0 -16:5 0 Ru n 3

10-17-1 3 12:3 0 -15:2 5 Ru n 4

10-18-1 3 09:3 5 -12:2 0 Averag e Arseni c (Total ) lb/h r 0.025 6 0.010 8 0.012 9 0.016 4 Berylhu m(Total ) lb/h r 0.0003 1 0.0003 0 0.0004 1 0.0003 4 Chromiu m(Total ) lb/h r 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 46. 0 Tota l LV M (Arsenic , Beryllium , Chromium ) lb/h r 46.3 46. 1 45. 8 46. 1 Arsem c (Pumpable ) lb/h r 0.0215 2 0.0073 8 0.0085 1 0.0124 7 Berylliu m(Pumpable ) lb/h r 0.0000 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 0 0.00000 0 Chromiu m(Pumpable ) lb/h r 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 46. 0 Pumpabl e LV M (Arsenic , Beryllium , Chromium ) lb/h r 46.3 46. 1 45. 7 46.0 Cadmiu m lb/h r 0.0271 7 0.0158 4 0.0192 9 0.0207 7 Lea d lb/h r 62. 1 62. 5 62. 2 62.3 Tota l SV M (Cadmium , Lead ) lb/h r 62. 1 62.5 62. 2 62. 3 Mercur y lb/h r 0.0022 0 0.0021 3 0.0022 6 0.0022

0



### 4-5 3

### Tabl e 4-42 . Uni t 4 - Metal s Feedrate s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 10-23-1 3 10-24-1 3 10-25-1 3 12:3 6 -15:2 0 12:3

5 -15:1 5 13:3

5 -16:1 1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,97 9 1,98 7 1,99 9 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 5. 5 4. 9 2. 9 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 4 <0.09 8 <0.09 6 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 13. 6 12. 1 9. 4 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 1. 3 1. 2 0.8 4 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 3. 3 2. 9 1. 6 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil n Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.1 1 0.1 4 0.1 1 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.010 9 0.0097 3 0.0058 0 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001 9 <0.0001 9 <0.0001 9 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.026 9 0.024 0 0.018 8 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0025 7 0.0023 8 0.0016 8 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0065 3 0.0057 6 0.0032 0 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00021 8 0.00027 8 0.00022 0

Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,18 9 1,20 1 1,20 2 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 1.4 0.3 7 <0.3 2 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 9 <0.09 3 <0.09 7 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.1 2 <0.07 3 <0.07 7 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.2 4 <0. 2 <0.2 1 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 1. 1 0. 4 <0.2 7 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil n Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.04 8 0.02 1 0.01 8 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0016 6 0.00044 4 <0.0003 8 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001 2 •cO.0001 1 <0.0001 2 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00014 3 <0.00008 8 <0.00009 3 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00028 5 <0.0002 4 <0.0002 5 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0013 1 0.00048 0 <0.0003 2 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000057 1 0.000025 2 0.000021 6

Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,18 6 1,20 2 1,19 6 Arsem c Con e (mg/kg ) <0. 3 <0.3 2 <0.3 1 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 2 <0.09 8 <0.09 4 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.07 3 <0.07 7 <0.07 4 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0. 2 <0.2 2 <0.2 1 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 0.2 6 <0.2 7 <0.2 6 Liqui dWast e to SC C Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.01 7 0.01 9 0.01 7 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.0003 6 <0.0003 8 <0.0003 7 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001 1 <0.0001 2 <0.0001 1 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00008 7 <0.00009 3 <0.00008 9 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.0002 4 <0.0002 6 <0.0002 5 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00030 8 <0.0003 2 <0.0003 1 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000020 2 0.000022 8 0.000020 3

Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 51 4 50 5 50 8 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 2. 4 2 2. 1 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.1 3 0.1 6 <0. 1 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.4 6 0.4 3 0.4 5 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 45. 2 58. 9 35. 1 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 35. 9 21 2 25. 4 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.1 8 0.2 4 0.2 6 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0012 3 0.0010 1 0.0010 7 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000066 8 0.000080 9 <0.00005 1 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00023 7 0.00021 7 0.00022 8 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.023 2 0.029 8 0.017 8 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.018 5 0.10 7 0.012 9 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000092 6 0.00012 1 0.00013 2



### 4-5 4

### Tabl e 4-42 . (continued ) Uni t 4 - Metal s Feedrate s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 10-23-1 3 10-24-1 3 10-25-1 3 12:3 6 -15:2 0 12:3

5 -15:1 5 13:3

5 -16:1 1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 525 1 559 8 534 5 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 2.2 3 2.2 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.2 1 0.2 8 0.2 6 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.2 8 0.3 7 0. 3 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 35. 6 37. 9 29. 8 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 4 1 58. 1 26. 6 Bul k Soli dWast e Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.08 2 0.1 2 0.07 7 Arsem c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.011 6 0.016 8 0.011 8 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0011 0 0.0015 7 0.0013 9 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0014 7 0.0020 7 0.0016 0 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.18 7 0.21 2 0.15 9 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.21 5 0.32 5 0.14 2 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00043 1 0.00067 2 0.00041 2 Arsem c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 46. 0 46. 0 45. 8 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 62. 0 61. 1 62. 0 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.039 3 0.038 8 0.039 4 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.012 5 0.010 2 0.0058 0 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.027 1 0.024 0 0.018 8 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 46. 0 46. 0 45. 8 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0081 5 0.0062 4 0.0032 0 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00029 5 0.00032 6 0.00026 2 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.025 3 0.028 0 0.018 6 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0011 7 0.0016 5 0.0013 9 Tota l Feedrate 2 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.028 8 0.026 3 0.020 6 Tota l Feedrate 2 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 46. 2 46.3 46. 0 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 62. 2 61. 5 62. 2 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.040 2 0.039 9 0.040 2

1 Th e weigh t

o f th e Containerize dSoli dWast e use dt o calculat e th e feedrate s o f chlorin e an dmetal s ha s bee n reduce db y th e weigh t

o f th e box , an dth e spikin g material s lea dnitrate , hexachloroethane , an dth e solutio n o f mercuri c nitrate
.
2Non-detect s treate das azer o "0"
.



### 4-5 5

### Tabl e 4-43 . Uni t 4 - HWC MAC TMetal s Feedrate s
Units Run l Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Averag e Units 10-8-1 3

15:4 0 -18:4 3 10-10-1 3

12:3 0 -15:1 0 10-30-13

12:4 5 -15:3 2 Averag e Arseni c (Total ) lb/h r 0.025 3 0.028 0 0.018 6 0.024 0 Berylliu m(Total ) lb/h r 0.0011 7 0.0016 5 0.0013 9 0.0014 0 Chromiu m(Total ) lb/h r 46. 2 46. 3 46. 0 46. 1 Tota l LV M (Arsenic , Beryllium , Chromium ) lb/h r 46.2 46. 3 46.0 46. 2 Arseni c (Pumpable ) lb/h r 0.012 5 0.010 2 0.005 8 0.009 5 Berylliu m(Pumpable ) lb/h r 0.0000 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 0 0.00000 0 Chromiu m(Pumpable ) lb/h r 46. 0 46. 0 45. 8 45. 9 Pumpabl e LV M (Arsenic , Beryllium , Chromium ) Ib/hr 46.0 46.0 45.8 45. 9 Cadmiu m lb/h r 0.028 8 0.026 3 0.020 6 0.025 2 Lea d lb/h r 62. 2 61. 5 62. 2 62. 0 Tota l SV M (Cadmium , Lead ) lb/h r 62. 2 61.6 62. 2 62. 0 Mercur y lb/h r 0.040 2 0.039

9 0.040

2 0.040 1



### 4-5 6

### 5. 0 Qualit y Assurance/Qualit y Contro l

A s par t o f the comprehensiv e performanc e test , aproject-specifi c qualit y assurance/quality contro l (QA/QC ) effor t wa s develope dan dimplemented
. Thi s QA/Q C effor t wa s documente di n th e QAPjP , an dwa s tailore dto meet th e specifi c need s o f

thi s tes t effort
. Th e result s o f th e QA/Q C activitie

s demonstrat

e tha tth e qualit y o f projec t measuremen

tdat ai s wel l documente

d an d tha tth e dat aar e reliable, defensible

, an d mee tprojec tobjectives

. Th e primar y objective s o f th e QA/Q C effor t

were to control , assess , an ddocumen t dat a quality
. T o accomplis hthes e objectives , th e QA/Q C approac hconsiste do f th e followin g ke y elements :

• Definitio n o f

qualit y assuranc e objective s tha t reflec t the overal l technica l objective s o f th e measurement

program ;

• Desig n o f

asampling , analytical , QA/Q C an ddat aanalysi s syste mto meet thos e objectives ;

• Evaluatio n o f

th e performanc e o f

th e measurement

system ; an d

• Initiatio n o f

correctiv e actio n whe n measurement syste mperformanc e doe s no t mee t the specification s Th e CP T o f

th e incinerator s a

t Veoli aSauge t

wa s conducte di n accordanc e wit hth e Q A procedure s describe di n th e Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Comprehensive Performance Test of the Units 2 and

3 Fixed Hearth Incinerators and the Unit 4 Rotary Kiln Incinerator, September

25, 2013. Thes e Q A procedure s includ e samplin g an danalytica l procedures , alon g wit hspecifie dcalibratio n requirements , Q C checks , dat areductio n an dvalidatio n procedures , an dsampl e tracking
. A revie w o f analytica l result s fo r

QA/Q C sample s an dassessment o f overal l dat aqualit y i s presente di n thi s section
. Detaile dQ C informatio n i s presente di n th e appendice s to thi s report . Th e section s belo w present discussion s o f

th e QA/Q C activitie s associate dwit hth e overal l qualit y o f

th e dataassociate dwit hthe CPT
. Althoug hsevera l mino r issue s ar e identifie d an ddiscusse di n the followin g sections , th e overal l conclusio n o f the QA/Q C assessmen t i s tha t the result s o f

th e testin g ar

e o f hig hquality , an dar

e appropriate fo r

thei r intende duse . Afe w mino r

issue s were identifie ddurin g th e QA/Q C assessment . Thes e issue s an dthei r impac t o n datausabilit y ar

e discusse di n greate

r detai l i n followin g sections
.
5- 1

### 5. 1 Audi t Sample s

Audi t sample s were acquire dfro maSigma-Aldric hRT C fo r metal s an dhydroge n chloride
. Thes e sample s were submitte dto th e analytica l laboratory alon g wit hth e sample s collecte ddurin g the CPT
. Thes e result s ar e include do n the laboratory report s generate db y Tes t America
. Th e evaluatio n o f the result s b y Sigm aAldric hRT C i s presente di n Appendi x G6
. Th e result s o f

the audi t sample s ar

e summarize di n Tabl e 5-1
. Laborator y analysi s o f eac haudi t sampl e wa s rate das "Acceptable"
.

Tabl e 5-1 . Result s o

f Analysi s o

f Audi t Sample s Resul t Assigne

d Valu e Evaluatio

n Metal s o n Filter Arseni c ((xg/filter

) 20.3 1 21. 0 Acceptabl e Berylliu m(u,g/filter

) 12.1 6 11. 3 Acceptabl e Cadmium(ng/filter

) 11.7 2 11. 2 Acceptabl e Chromiu m(u.g/filter

) 17.6 7 16. 1 Acceptabl e Lead(jxg/filter) 21.6 0 21. 0 Acceptabl e Metal s i n Impinge

rSolutio n Arseni c ([xg/ml

) 0.1884 0.20 1 Acceptabl e 

### Berylliu m(ug/ml

) 0.057 6 0.053 0 Acceptabl e 

### Cadmiu m(ug/ml

) 0.105 3 0.10 5 Acceptabl e Chromiu m(u,g/ml

) 0.201 7 0.202 Acceptabl e Lea d(u,g/ml

) 0.2102 0.202 Acceptabl e Mercury (ng/ml) 13. 9 15. 0 Acceptabl e Hydroge n Chlorid

e in Impinge

rSolutio n (mg/L ) 30. 4 27. 6 Acceptabl e


### 5. 2 Analysi s o f Wast e Feed s 5.2. 1 Analysi s o f Wast e Feed s fo r Metal s Sample s o f

waste fee dmaterial s wer e analyze dfo r mercur y usin g CVAA , accordin g t o SW-84 6 Metho d7470A
. Thes e sam e sample s were als o analyze dfo r arsenic , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , an dlea dusin g ICPES , accordin g to SW-84 6 Metho d6010B
. Thes e sample s wer e prepare dfo r analysi s usin g appropriat e extractio n o r dilutio n techniques
. Qualit y assuranc e an dqualit y contro l activitie s associate dwit hthes e analyse s included :

• Sampl e handlin g an dpreservation ;

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f laboratory blanks ;
5- 2

### • Preparatio n an danalysi s o f laboratory contro l samples ;

• Duplicat e preparatio n an danalysi s o f receive dsamples ;

• Analysi s o f

duplicat e samples ; an d

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f matri x spik e (MS ) an dmatri x spik e duplicat e (MSD ) samples
. Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar

e supportable , an duseable
. Se e the detaile ddat aqualit y assessment i n Appendi x H
. Th e followin g issue s were identifie da s par t o f thi s dat aqualit y assessment :

• Th e QAPj Pspecifie s the performanc e o f matri x spike/matri x spik e duplicate s wit h 75-125 % recovery , 0-20 % RP D fo r mercur y an d70-130 % recovery , 0-20 % RP D fo r other metals
. On e hundre deighty-seve n o f 20 4 M S o r

MS D met

the specification s fo r recovery . On e hundre do f 10 2 MS/MS D pair s me t th e specificatio n fo r

RPD
. Th e followin g sample s were outsid e th e specification :

—VS2-CS-11B-COMP2B : Arseni c recover y 67 % i n MS , arseni c RP D 23% , chromiu mrecovery 149 % an d172 % i n MS/MSD ;

—VS2-CS-15B-COMP2B : chromiu mrecover y 150 % i n MSD ;

—VS3-CS-12B-COMP2B : chromiu mrecover y 13 1 an d145 % i n MS/MSD ;

—VS4-BS-13B-COMP2B : chromiu mrecover y 13 2 an d134 % i n MS/MSD , lea d recover y 208 % i n MSD ;

—VS4-CS-13B-COMP2B : chromiu mrecovery 16 4 an d186 % i n MS/MSD , lea d recover y 406 % i n MS , lea dRP D 49% , mercury recover y 6 1 an d45 % i n MS/MSD ; an d

—VS4-L B W-12B-COMP2B : cadmiu mrecover y 145 % i n MSD , mercury recovery 7 1 an d66 % i n MS/MSD
. Metal s feedrate s ar

e develope das asu mo f total s fe dt o th e syste mas LV M (arsenic , berylliu man dchromium) ; SV M (cadmiu man dlead ) an dmercury . Th e MS/MS D outlier s detaile dabov e indicat e increase duncertainty i n th e concentration s o f th e metal s i n thos e streams . Th e contributio n o f thes e stream s to the total feedrate s o f LVM , SV M an dmercur y ar e negligible , an dth e increase duncertainty i n thes e concentration s ha s n o impac t o n th e conclusion s o f

th e report . N o dataar

e qualifie d o r invalidate dbase do n MS/MS D results
.

5- 3

### 5.2. 2 Analysi s of Wast e Feed s fo r Physica l an d Chemica l Parameter s Sample s o f

liqui dan dsoli dwaste fee dmaterial s wer e analyze dfo r as hcontent , tota l chlorine , density , gros s calorifi c value , kinemati c viscosity , an dpercen t moisture , usin g the followin g methods :

• As hContent : ASTMD482 ;
• Tota l Chlorine : KNOXWC-0016 ;
• Density : AST M D1963 ;
• Gros s Calorifi c Value : AST M D240 , AST M D5865 ;
• Kinemati c Viscosity : AST M D 445 ; an d

• Percen t

Moisture : Metho d160.3 , AST M D017
. Qualit y assuranc e an dqualit y contro l activitie s associate dwit hthes e analyse s included :

• Sampl e handlin g an dpreservation ;
• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;
• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f laboratory blanks ;
• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f laboratory contro l samples ;
• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f matri x spik e an dmatri x spik e duplicat e samples ;
• Collectio n an danalysi s o f duplicat e samples ; an d

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f selecte dsample s i n duplicate
. Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t dat aar e supportable , an dusabl e fo r th e purpos e o f demonstratin g regulatory compliance
. Se e the detaile ddat aqualit y assessment i n Appendi x H
. Th e followin g issue s were identifie ddurin g the cours e o f th e QA/Q C assessment :

• Selecte dsample s wer e analyze di n duplicate
. Ninet y o f 9 6 duplicat e analyse s me t th e QAP Pspecification s (see tabl e below)
. Th e outlier s are :

- As hi n VS2-HBW-13B-COMP2B ; result s o f 58 2 an d64 6 mg/kg ; RP D o f 10.4% ;

- Gros s Calorifi c Valu e i n VS2-LBW-15B-COMP2B ; result s o f 17 8 an d15 2 Btu/lb ; RP D o f

15.8% ;

- Chlorin e i n VS3-CS-11A-COM P1 ; result s o f 25 3 an d32 5 mg/kg ; RP D o f 24.9% ;

- Chlorin e i n VS4-BS-1 1 A-COM P1 ; result s o f 17 1 an d22 1 mg/kg ; RP D o f 25.5% ;

- As hi n VS4-HBW-12B-COMP2B-DUP ; result s o f 94 3 an d105 0 mg/kg ; RP D o f 10.7% ; an d

- As hVS4-HBW-13A-COM P1 ; result s o f 1,500 an d92 8 mg/kg ; RP D o f 47.1%
. Th e outlier s fo r

duplicat e analysi s hav e anegligibl e impac t o n the usabilit y o f

th e data
. Th e chlorin e carrie di n containerize dsolid s an dbul k solid s i s negligibl e (<1% ) compare dto the chlorin e provide db y th e spikin g material
. Th e as hcarrie di n high

Bt u waste i s negligibl e (<1% ) compare dt o th e as hprovide db y the bul k o r
5- 4

### containerize dsolids
. Th e hea t inpu t result s i n low-Bt u waste ar e nea r the detectio n limit
. Increase duncertainty i s expecte dclos e to th e detectio n limit
. N o dataar e qualifie do r

invalidate dbase do n th e result s o f duplicat e analysis
.
• N o duplicat e analysi s wa s performe dfo r moistur e i n soli dwaste streams . Thi s duplicat e analysi s wa s specifie di n th e QAPjP
. Thi s ha s n o impac t o n th e usabilit y o f th e data
. Moistur e result s ar e use donl y to characteriz e th e waste fee dmaterials , an d ar e no t use di n any demonstratio n o f compliance
. N o dat aar e qualifie dor

invalidate d base do n thi s omission
. 5. 3 Stac k

Ga s 5.3. 1 Isokineti c Sampl e Collectio n Isokineti c samplin g train s were use dfo r th e collectio n o f

sample s fo r

the determinatio n of :

• Particulat e matte r accordin g to EP AMetho d5 ;

• Hydroge n chlorid e an dchlorin e accordin g t o Modifie dEP AMetho d26A ;

• Metal s accordin g t

o EP AMetho d29 ; an dPolychlorinate ddibenzodioxin s an d polychlorinate ddibenzofuran s accordin g t o SW-84 6 Metho d0023A
. Qualit y assuranc e an dqualit y contro l activitie s associate dwit hth e collectio n o f thes e sample s included :

• Collectio n o f

the specifie dvolume s o f stac k gas ove r th e specifie dduration ;

• Collectio n o f

stac k gas withi n 90-110 % o f isokinetic ;

• Maintainin g the probe , filte r an d(o n applicabl e trains ) heate dtransfe r lin e a t th e specifie dtemperatures ;

• Maintainin g the impinge r exi t an d(o n applicabl e trains ) the condenser exi t a t th e specifie dtemperature ;

• Performin g samplin g trai n leak check s befor e sampl e collection , a t port changes , an d afte r sampl e collection ;

• Performin g pito t

tub e leak

check s befor e an dafte r sampl e collection ; an d

• Recordin g al l datao n pre-printe ddat asheets
. Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t samplin g wa s performe daccordin g to th e method s an dth e QAPjP
. Se e the detaile ddat aqualit y assessment i n Appendi x H
. Samplin g dat a sheets ar e presente di n Appendi x F
. Calibratio n documentatio n fo r al l fiel dequipment

i s presente di n Appendi x I
. N o issue s were identifie da s par t o f the dat aqualit y assessment .

5- 55.3. 2 Analysi s o f Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r Determinatio n o f P M Sample s o f

stac k gas fo r determinatio n o f

particulat e matter

(PM ) were collecte di n a samplin g trai n meetin g th e requirement s EP A Metho d5
. Qualit y assuranc e an dqualit y contro l activitie s associate dwit hthi s analysi s included :

• Sampl e handlin g an dpreservation;

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;
• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f laboratory blanks ;
• Collectio n an danalysi s o f fiel dblanks ;
• Repeatabilit y o f

sequential weighings ; an d

• Dail y balanc e calibration
. Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar

e supportable , an duseable
. Se e th e detaile ddat aqualit y assessmen t i n Appendi x H
. Th e followin g issu e wa s identifie ddurin g th e QA/Q C review :

• Th e fiel dblan k

prob e an dnozzl e rins e ha dobservabl e level s nea r the detectio n limit
. Th e level s o f

particulat e materia l observe di n the PN Rsample s wer e ver y low , an d nea r the detectio n limit
. Level s i n th e fiel dsample s were simila r to thes e results , an d ma y hav e apositiv e bias
. A s apositiv e bia s i s conservativ e relativ e to th e estimatio n o f emissions , n o dataar

e qualifie do r

invalidate dbase do n fiel dblan k results
. 5.3. 3 Analysi s o f Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r Determinatio n of HCI/CI 2 Sample s o f

stac k gas fo r determinatio n o f

hydroge n chlorid e an dchlorin e (HCI/CI2 ) were collecte di n aModifie dEP A Metho d26 A samplin g train
. Sample s recovere dfro mthi s samplin g trai n were analyze dfo r hydroge n chlorid e an dchlorin e usin g io n chromatography , accordin g t o E P A Metho d26A
. Qualit y assuranc e an dqualit y contro l activitie s associate dwit hthes e analyse s included :

• Sampl e handlin g an dpreservation;

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;
• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f laboratory blanks ;
• Collectio n an danalysi s o f fiel dblanks ;
• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f laboratory contro l samples ;
• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f matri x spik e an dmatri x spik e duplicat e samples ; an d

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f al l sample s i n duplicate
.

5- 6

### Revie w o f thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar

e supportable , an duseable
. Se e the detaile ddataqualit y assessment i n Appendi x H
. Th e followin g issu e wa s identifie ddurin g th e QA/Q C review :

• Hydroge n chlorid e wa s consistentl y detecte di n the fiel dblan k samples
. Th e level s o f hydroge n chlorid e observe d(approximatel y 6 0 fi g pe r sample ) ar

e wel l belo w th e level s observe di n the fiel dsample s (al l greater tha n 1,800 \ig

per sample)
. Thes e level s ar e negligibl e an dhav e n o impac t o n th e data
. N o dat aar e qualifie do r invalidate dbase do n blan k results
. 5.3. 4 Analysi s of Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r Determinatio n o f Metal s Sample s fo r

determinatio n o f

metal s i n stac k

gas were collecte daccordin g to EP A Metho d29
. Th e filters , impinge r solution s an drinse s were analyze dfo r mercury b y CVA A accordin g to SW-84 6 Metho d7470 A an dfo r arsenic , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , an dlea d b y ICPES , accordin g t o SW-84 6 Metho d6010B
. Qualit y assuranc e an dqualit y contro l activitie s associate dwit hthes e analyse s included :

• Sampl e handlin g an dpreservation;

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f laboratory blanks ;

• Collectio n an danalysi s o f fiel dblanks ;

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f medi achec k

samples ;

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f laborator y contro l sample s (LCS ) an dlaboratory chec k sampl e duplicate s (LCSD) ;

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f matri x spik e an dmatri x spik e duplicat e samples ; an d

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f pos t digestio n spik e (PDS ) an dpos t digestio n spik e duplicat e (PDSD ) samples
. Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar

e supportable , an duseable
. Se e th e detaile ddataqualit y assessment i n Appendi x H
. Th e followin g issue s were identifie ddurin g th e QA/Q C review :

• Arseni c wa s foun dabov e th e detectio n limi t i n laboratory blan k

sample s associate d wit hanalysi s o f

PNR/filte r

samples
. Th e blan k

result s fo r

arseni c i n the laboratory blank s ar e nea r th e detectio n limit , an dsimila r to or belo w the result s fo r

th e fiel d samples
. Thi s may indicat e asligh t positiv e bia s i n th e fiel dresults
. Sample s wer e no t correcte dfo r

fiel dblan k

results
. N o result s ar

e invalidate do r

qualifie dbase do n blan k results
.
5- 7

### • Cadmiu man dmercury were eac hfoun di n one fiel dblan k sample
. Th e singl e positiv e resul t

fo r cadmiu mi n on e fiel dblan k i s simila r

i n magnitud e to the fiel d results
. Th e singl e positiv e resul t fo r mercur y i n on e fiel dblan k i s nea r th e detectio n limit , an dwel l belo w man y o f th e fiel dresults
. Thes e ma y indicat e asligh t positiv e bia s i n the fiel dsamples
. Sample s wer e no t correcte dfo r

fiel dblan k

results
. N o result s ar e invalidate do r

qualifie dbase do n blan k results
.
• Chromiu mwa s consistentl y observe di n fiel dblank s an dmedi achec k samples
. Th e consisten t

observatio n o f

chromiu mi n fiel dblan k an dmedi achec k

sample s i s a

t a lowe r leve l tha n th e fiel dsamples
. Thi s ma y indicat e asligh t positiv e bia s i n th e result s fo r

th e fiel dsamples
. Sample s wer e no t correcte dfo r

fiel dblan k

results
. N o result s ar e invalidate do r

qualifie dbase do n blan k results
. 5.3. 5 Analysi s of Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r Determinatio n o f Dioxins/Furan s Sample s fo r

determinatio n o f

th e polychlorinate ddibenzodioxin s an ddibenzofuran s (dioxins/furans ) were collecte daccordin g to the methodolog y describe di n SW-84 6 Metho d0023A
. Th e filters , sorbent traps , an drinse s fro mthes e sample s were prepare dfo r analysi s accordin g to SW-84 6 Metho d0023A , an dth e resultin g extract s analyze dfo r dioxins/furan s b y high-resolutio n GCMS , accordin g to SW-84 6 Metho d8290
. Qualit y assuranc e an dqualit y contro l activitie s associate dwit hthes e analyse s included :

• Sampl e handlin g an dpreservation ;

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f laboratory blanks ;

• Collectio n an danalysi s o f fiel dblanks ;

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f medi achec k

samples ;

• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f laboratory contro l sample s an dlaboratory chec k sampl e duplicates ; an d

• Additio n o f

surrogat e compound s to eac hsample
. Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dataar

e supportable , an duseable
. Se e th e detaile ddat aqualit y assessment i n Appendi x H
. Th e followin g issu e wa s identifie ddurin g th e QA/Q C revie w o f

thes e data :

• Al l target

analyte s excep t

2,3,7,8-TCD D wer e observe di n amedi achec k sample , laboratory blan k

o r fiel dblank
. Th e level s observe di n th e blan k sample s ar

e ver y low , typicall y nea

r the detectio n limit
. Typicall y thes e level s ar e belo w th e level s observe di n the fiel dsamples
. Thi s indicate s apotentia l positiv e bia s i n th e fiel d samples , whic hi s conservativ e relativ e to the determinatio n o f emissio n rate . N o dat a ar e qualifie dor

invalidate dbase do n blan k results
. 5- 8

### 5.3. 6 Monitorin g o f Stac k Ga s fo r 0 2 

### , C0 2 

### , an d TH C Th e stac k

gas wa s monitore dfo r

oxyge n (0 2 

### ) , carbo n dioxid e (CO2) , an dtota l hydrocarbon s (THC ) accordin g to EP AMethod s 3 A an d25A , respectively
. Qualit y assuranc e an dqualit y contro l activitie s associate dwit hcontinuou s emissio n monitorin g include :

• Us e o f

calibratio n ga s standard s o f know n an dacceptabl e quality ;
• Us e o f

calibratio n ga s standard s i n th e specifie dranges , • Performanc e o f

syste mbia s checks , • Performanc e o f

calibratio n erro r

tests ; an d

• Performanc e o f

zer o an dspa

n drif t checks
. Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar

e supportabl e an dusable
. Se e th e dat aqualit y assessment i n Appendi x H Copie s o f certification s o f

calibratio n ga s standard s ar e presente di n Appendi x LRa w dat afo r continuou s emissio n monitor s ar e presente di n Appendi x F
. Th e followin g issu e wa s identifie ddurin g th e QA/Q C revie w o f thi s data :

• Seventy o f

7 2 drif t check s fo r

tota l hydrocarbon s met metho dspecifications
. Th e tw o outlier s were bothdurin g Uni t 2 Ru n IB
. A drif

t o f 8.0 % wa s seen a

t 1800 , an dadrif

t o f 8.3 % wa s observe da

t 1909
. I n accordanc e wit hEP AMetho d25A , th e tota l hydrocarbo n analyze r

wa s immediatel y re-calibrate dfollowin g eac ho f th e drif t excursions
. Th e dat afro mthe ru n wa s the n recalculate dusin g bothcalibratio n curve s an dth e highe r

(more conservative ) resul t reported
. A s the averag e TH C wa s wel l belo w the standard , an dtha t th e conservativ e recalculatio n approac hspecifie di n th e metho dwa s implemented , any uncertainty i n thes e dat aha s n o impac t o n th e conclusio n o f

th e repor

t an dth e demonstratio n o f compliance
. N o dat aar e flagge do r invalidate dbase do n the calibratio n drif t results
. 5. 4 Proces s Dat a I n accordanc e wit hthe MAC T requirements , al l proces s instrumentatio n wa s calibrated
. AContinuous Monitoring System Performance Evaluation Test Plan (CMSPETP ) wa s prepare d an ddefine s th e calibratio n procedure s an dacceptanc e criteria
. Th e testin g specifie di n th e CMSPET Pwa s performe dprio r to th e CPT
. Dat afro mth e CMSPE T i s presente di n Appendi x D
.

### 5. 5 Spikin g A s detaile di n Section s 1. 3 an d2. 3 an dAppendi x B , durin g the CPT , liquid s an dsolid s were spike dint o th e incinerato r feed
. QA/Q C activitie s associate dwit hthe spikin g included :

• Us e o f

spikin g material s o f

know n an dacceptabl e quality ;

• Collectio n o f

datao n dat asheets an dappropriat e dataacquisitio n systems ;

• Calibratio n o f

pumps ; an d

• Documentatio n o f

preparatio n o f

spikin g packets
. Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t th e spikin g dat aar

e supportabl e an duseable
.

5-1 0