alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James T. Connolly, an Executor of Sylvester G. Connolly, Appellant, *v.*Eugene Connolly et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

April 24, 1957.

*Edward J. 8. Farrell*for appellant.

*Lester G. Knopping*for Eugene Connolly and another, respondents.

*Peter Campbell Brown, Corporation Counsel (Edward A. Doberman*of counsel), for City of New York and another, respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Title to the checks issued to the decedent during his lifetime passed to his legal representative upon his death (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 202, subd. 8). The executor, alone, had *292the power to deal with the checks, either to negotiate or to surrender them. The individual defendants have been unjustly enriched by the receipt of funds which belonged to the estate of the decedent.

Whether the decedent, by failing to cash the checks, retained the right to change his option up to the date of his death is immaterial. The fact is that he did not change his option. .Moreover, the individual defendants’ rights spring from the option chosen by the decedent, under the terms of which certain payments were to be made to him during his lifetime, and ■the balance of the fund paid to the designated beneficiaries at (his death. Insofar as checks were issued, title thereto passed to the decedent upon their delivery to him and, like any other asset, to his executor upon his death.

Two judgments, each dismissing plaintiff’s complaint in an action submitted on agreed state of facts, should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and judgment granted in favor of the ¡plaintiff in the sum of $1,323.36 against all defendants and in favor of the defendants the City of New York and the New York City Employees’ Retirement System on their cross claim in the sum of $661.68 against each individual defendant, without costs.

Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26366]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated May 19, 2000, and published in the Federal Register 
on May 30, 2000, (65 FR 34498), Chemic Laboratories, Inc., 480 Neponset 
Street, Building 7C, Canton, Massachusetts 02021, made application to 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of cocaine (9041), a basic class of controlled substance 
listed in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to bulk manufacture small quantities of cocaine 
derivative for a customer.
    DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, 
Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Chemic 
Laboratories, Inc. to manufacture is consistent with the public 
interest at this time. DEA has investigated Chemic Laboratories, Inc. 
to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public 
interest. These investigations have included inspection and testing of 
the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's 
compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's 
background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 
0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 
Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the 
above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class 
of controlled substance listed above is granted.

    Dated: August 18, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-26366 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Exhibit
23.1




Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm




We
consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Oragenics, Inc. of
our report dated March 31, 2009, with respect to the 2008 financial statements
of Oragenics, Inc.  We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-110646) of Oragenics, Inc.
pertaining to the Oragenics, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan;




/s/
      Kirkland, Russ, Murphy & Tapp,
PA




Certified
Public Accountants




Clearwater,
Florida




March 31,
2009
#### CARD v. STATE.

No. 25283.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 14, 1951.

Grady Hazelwood, Amarillo, for appellant. . '

Tom Braley, Dist. Atty., Pampa, and George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on an indictment charging removal of mortgaged property out of Wheeler County' and was assessed two years in the penitentiary.

On original submission the appeal was dismissed because of a defective record. Tex.Cr.App., 239 S.W.2d 395. Correction has now beén made and the appeal is considered on its merits.

It will be necessary to discuss only one of the errors pointed out by the appeal. The indictment alleges the injured party to be the “Farmers and Merchants Bank of Shamrock, Texas.” There is no allegation that it is a corporation. The proof shows that the injúred party is‘an incorporated bárik.

There is a further variance between the allegation and the' proof in that the evidence introduced by the state shows the name of the bank to be “Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Shamrock, Texas.” Williams v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 386, 39 S.W.2d 79; Reese v. State, 119 Tex.Cr.R. 582, 44 S.W.2d 679; and Nichols v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 41, 123 S.W.2d 672.

Because of the variance between the allegation and the proof the-judgment of the trial court is reversed and the'cause is remanded.
#### Orville MILLER and Robert Monk, Appellants, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 22561.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 19, 1943.

Aubrey Davee, of Brady, for appellants.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellants were convicted of robbery by assault, and their punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years each.

Since their appeal was perfected, appellants have filed their application, duly verified, asking the privilege of withdrawing the same. The request is granted and the appeal ordered dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

For the following periods the registrant had no securities that were dilutive
for the calculation of earnings per share.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             Weighted average number of
Summary from unaudited      Basic and diluted loss per        basic and diluted common
 financial statements        common share                     stock shares outstanding
----------------------      --------------------------       --------------------------
Three months ended
<S>                         <C>                              <C>
02/28/2001                                       (0.04)                      12,967,287

Three months ended
02/29/2000                                       (0.04)                      10,514,283

Nine months ended
02/28/2001                                       (0.11)                      12,604,090

Nine months ended
02/29/2000                                       (0.10)                      10,215,912
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26577]



[[Page 61352]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, September 26, 2000, 12:30 
p.m. to September 26, 2000 2:30 p.m., NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 
20892 which was published in the Federal Register on September 21, 
2000, 65 FR 57201-57202.
    The meeting will be held October 24, 2000, from 11 a.m. to 12:30 
p.m. The location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: October 6, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-26577 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enesco Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
W. Lemajeur, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
          the Securties Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the
          operations of the Company.


August 14, 2002                      By: /s/ Jeffrey W. Lemajeur
                                         ---------------------------
                                     Chief Financial Officer










                                       31
NUMBER 13-10-00018-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF 

AGNES WILLEMIN MEELER

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

of Victoria County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Barbara Hennig and William W. Matthews, perfected an appeal from a 

judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 1 of Victoria County, Texas, in cause 

number GDN 1-119. On February 4, 2010, this Court abated the case to allow the 

parties the opportunity to engage in settlement negotiations. The case is hereby 

REINSTATED.

Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, with prejudice. Appellants

request that this Court dismiss the appeal.
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion to 

dismiss the appeal, with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is 

hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against 

the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants= request, no motion for 

rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

22nd day of April, 2010.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-19-0000085 24-FEB-2020 08:11 AM
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the report of Worldwide Biotech & Pharmaceutical Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wenxia Guo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Wenxia Guo


Wenxia Guo


Chief Executive Officer


August 14, 2009
##### 



Exhibit 99.3 (GREENPOINT LETTERHEAD) (GREENPOINT MORTGAGE LOGO)  To: RWT Holdings, Inc. Re: Annual Statement as to Compliance by the Seller Pursuant to Section 6.04 of the Mortgage Loan Flow Purchase, Sale, and
Servicing Agreement between Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. as Seller (the
Seller) and RWT Holdings, Inc. as Purchaser, dated as of August 1, 2002 (the
Agreement), the undersigned officer of the Seller, hereby certifies as to the
following: (i) a review of the activities of the Seller during the calendar year ended
December 31, 2003 (the Applicable Period) and of the Sellers performance
under the Agreement has been made under the direct supervision of the
undersigned officer; and (ii) to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such review,
the Seller has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout
the Applicable Period, and there has been no known default in the fulfillment
of the Sellers obligations throughout such Applicable Period. Very Truly YoursGREENPOINT MORTGAGE
FUNDING, INC.
As Seller-s- Roy BriggsRoy Briggs
Title: Vice President
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0517

DCN:_____07479A22

__________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
OFFICEOFTHEATTORNEYGENERALOFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

!:on. 5. B. Fwohir,soa 

coufity Xudltor 

Powis CouAtp 

?JOdiOA, %UEm 

OpinloA NO. O-7336 

A 

Toter lettea date4 Baa 

Tosea Ranger forass and tha 

ji.triw0ti0n and 00tm0i 0r 

department of the Stata northat Sire6 aa6 provided by the 

ation bill, 8. 3. 317, ah. 378, 

on or thu lorsgol~ bill tll~~olosss appmprlt of ?ublio ‘hi&y for the bimalum ending 

1~ ~~al~rlsrr and, In addition, aontalnlng apthe mein or haadpuartom dlvlrlon at the 

bepartrrrent, limluding the Toran Ruqora, cr~uthorimd tar travel an6 

tranapo rtet ion oxpmuwa , aatolPoblla mmlntenanoe, portago, ~upplles, 

contingent, etc., rfd any other AbOW8~ry aepal%lmnt oxp*Ases, inoludlng equSpmant. tikewi8a,, amounta (~$8 appmprlated for the Texas 

H~RI~.NBS ?etrol ?lvlslon for aslarlts and subatantlally the mum authorlzei: eqmnsea.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00001

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

File Name Description

00001\00001_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 00001\00001_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00001\Certification Statement Plant ID_00001.pdf Plant certification statement

00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_MAP_WB.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_POND-1.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_Study Ash Pond Berm Stability.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_Study Ash Pond Berm Stability.zip Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_Table C-6 revision _1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_TEC Cinder Pit Overflow Drain Evaluation.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_Well_diagram.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00001\00001_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00001\00001_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 00001\00001_questions.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03187

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03187\03187_Checklist_102810_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03187\03187_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03187\03187_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03187\03187_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03187\03187_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03187\03187_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03187\Certification Statement Plant ID 03187.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03187\Supplemental Documents\SRB Aerial Maps.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03187\Supplemental Documents\SRB Water Balance Diagrams.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick J. Moore,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Patrick J. Moore    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Patrick J. Moore        |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| November 7, 2006        |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. and will beretained by Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Exhibit 15




Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, Northwest
Washington, D.C.  20549
Attention:  Document Control

Re:  7-Eleven, Inc. (formerly The Southland Corporation) Form 10-Q

We are aware that our report dated October 27, 1999, on our review of the
condensed consolidated balance sheet of 7-Eleven, Inc. and Subsidiaries as
of September 30, 1999, and the related condensed consolidated statements of
earnings for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
1999 and 1998, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for
the nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999 and 1998, included in this
Form 10-Q, is incorporated by reference in the following registration
statements:

                                                         REGISTRATION NO.
                                                         ----------------
     On Form S-8 for:

       Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Grant Stock Plan        33-25327

       1995 Stock Incentive Plan                                 33-63617

       Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
            for Eligible Employees                              333-42731

       Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors       333-68491


Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report
should not be considered a part of the registration statement prepared or
certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 12, 1999




                                     Tab 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricky West, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), both rendered June 13, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree under indictment No. 87-00813, after a nonjury trial, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree under indictment No. 87-01230, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the expert testimony at trial was not based entirely on comparative tests using "known” but uncertified standards, but on a series of different tests, using other scientific means. Thus, the court properly allowed the expert to express her opinion that the substance sold by the defendant was cocaine and it was for the trier of fact to determine what weight to give her opinion *(see, People v Hushie,*145 AD2d 506; *People v Flores,*138 AD2d 512; *People v Wicks,*122 AD2d 239).

The People clearly established a prima facie case against *441the defendant on each of the crimes charged under indictment No. 87-00813. Thus, the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for a trial order of dismissal was proper *(see, People v Levine,*106 AD2d 471; CPL 290.10 [1]).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

 

 

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO REQUIRED BYRULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OFTHE U. S. CODE

 

 

 

I certify,to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2004 of Norfolk Southern Railway Company fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofNorfolk Southern Railway Company.

 

 

 
| Signed: | /s/ David  R. Goode                    |
|---------|----------------------------------------|
|    | David R.  Goode                        |
|    | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|    | Norfolk Southern Railway Company       |

 

Dated: April 26, 2004

 

 

 

 

I certify,to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2004 of Norfolk Southern Railway Company fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofNorfolk Southern Railway Company.

 

 

 
| Signed: | /s/ Henry  C. Wolf                          |
|---------|---------------------------------------------|
|    | Henry C.  Wolf                              |
|    | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
|    | Norfolk Southern Railway Company            |

 

Dated: April 26, 2004