alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 3 Onshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 3 Onshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 360    | 639    | 449    | 83     | 176    | 110    | 389    | 577    | 59     | 190   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 199    | 204    | 182    | 130    | 171    | 22     | 225    | 249    | 232    | 314   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 8      | 61     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elizabeth Arden, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Scott Beattie, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Stephen J. Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(i)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Date:  February 8, 2008 |  | /s/ E. Scott Beattie                                                 
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |                                                                      
|                        |  | E. Scott Beattie
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer     
|                        |  |                                                                      
|                        |  |                                                                      
|Date:  February 8, 2008 |  | /s/ Stephen J. Smith                                                 
|                        |  |                                                                      
|                        |  | Stephen J. Smith
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  |                                                                      





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
**Exhibit 3.3**

 

**NORTHERN GROWERS, LLC****AMENDMENTAND ADDENDUM TO****OPERATINGAGREEMENT**

 

ThisAmendment and Addendum to Operating Agreement is made and effective as ofJuly 16, 2003.

 

**WHEREAS**, Northern Growers, LLC (the “Company”) desires to create a DisclosureCommittee for purposes of reviewing all necessary reports made to theSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

 

**WHEREAS**, Section 8.2(b) of the Operating Agreement requires members of acommittee to be comprised of one or more members of the Board of Managersand/or Members of the Company.

 

**WHEREAS**, the Company desires to allow non-members of the Company and non-Boardof Managers to serve on the Disclosure Committee.

 

**NOW, THEREFORE**, the Board hereby amends Section 8.2(b) of the OperatingAgreement to read as follows:

 

TheBoard of Managers may, from time to time, designate one or more committees,each of which shall be comprised of one or more members of the Board ofManagers, one or more members of the Company, and/or one or more non-members ofthe Board of Managers or of the Company. Any such committee, to the extent provided in such resolution shall haveand may exercise such authority as is designated by the Board of Managers,subject to limitations set forth in the Act. At every meeting of such committee, unless otherwise provided by theBoard of Managers, the presence of a majority of all the committee membersshall constitute a quorum, and the affirmative vote of the majority of thecommittee members present shall be necessary for the adoption of any resolutionor recommendation of any action. The Board of Managers may dissolve anycommittee at any time.

 

----
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted November 23, 2010

Decided November 30, 2010

Before

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

TERRENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

   

No. 10‐1631

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

MARK A. LEAZIER,

Defendant‐Appellant.                 

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Indiana,

South Bend Division.

No. 3:09‐CR‐00015(01)RM

Robert L. Miller, Jr.,

Judge.

O R D E R

Mark Leazier’s felony convictions made it a federal crime for him to possess a gun,

see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2006), but an Indiana law‐enforcement officer investigating Leazier

for hunting deer illegally caught him shooting a 9mm pistol.  The officer informed federal

agents, and Leazier was prosecuted under § 922(g)(1).  He pleaded guilty and was

sentenced to 60 months’ imprisonment, 10 months below the bottom of his guidelines

range.  Leazier filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed lawyer moves to withdraw

because he cannot identify any nonfrivolous argument to pursue.  See Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967).  Leazier has not responded to counsel’s submission.  See CIR. R. 51(b).

We confine our review to the potential issues identified in counsel’s facially adequate brief.

See United States v. Schuh, 289 F.3d 968, 973‐74 (7th Cir. 2002).  Counsel verified that Leazier

does not want his guilty plea set aside and thus appropriately omits possible challenges to

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

 FED. R. APP. P. 32.1
No. 10‐1631 Page 2

the plea colloquy or the voluntariness of the plea.  See United States v. Knox, 287 F.3d 667,

670‐72 (7th Cir. 2002).

Counsel reports that he searched the record for possible challenges to Leazier’s

sentence and considers arguing that the district court erred in counting two of his prior

convictions as felony crimes of violence, which yielded a base offense level of 24 under

U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(2).  Leazier had objected that one of those convictions, for robbery, was

reduced to misdemeanor theft, but, as counsel notes, Leazier withdrew that objection after

reviewing the written judgment.  He thus waived the objection, and so we agree with

counsel that an appellate claim would be frivolous. See United States v. Venturella, 585 F.3d

1013, 1019 (7th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 130 S.Ct. 1547 (2010).  

Counsel also considers arguing that Leazier’s prison sentence is unreasonably long.

But the prison term is below the guidelines range and thus is presumptively reasonable. See

United States v. Liddell, 543 F.3d 877, 885 (7th Cir. 2008); United States v. George, 403 F.3d 470,

473 (7th Cir. 2005).  No circumstance warrants disregarding that presumption here, so we

agree with counsel that it would be frivolous to challenge the reasonableness of Leazier’s

sentence.

The motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 2565 Lower Tribunal No. CF15

- 000502

- XX

_____________________________ L ORENZO M ARTINEZ , Appellant ,
v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141 (b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County

. Melissa Gravitt , Judge

. May 28, 2024
PER CURIAM

. AFFIRMED

. WHITE , MIZE and BROWNLEE , JJ., c oncur.

Lorenzo Martinez, DeFuniak Springs, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor , Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee

.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of George Ray et al., as Trustees of Samuel Weiser, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

November 7, 1957.

*Herbert A. Gone,*accounting trustee in person.

No other appearances.

Maximilian Moss, S.

The accountants are the executor of the deceased trustee, whose death terminated the trust herein, and two surviving trustees. They ask that they he instructed concerning the disposition of two bonds and mortgages held as estate assets.

The testator gave power to his ‘‘ executors and/or trustees, or the survivor of them * * * in the distribution of my estate or any part thereof to distribute the same in kind and in lieu of cash solely in their or his discretion.” That power permits deviation by the trustees from the usual rule that testamentary benefits are ordinarily payable in cash rather than in kind *(Villard*v. *Villard,*219 N. Y. 482; *Camp*v. *Smith,*49 Hun 100, affd. 117 N. Y. 354; *Matter of Denari,*165 Misc. 450). The remaindermen’s reaction to distribution in kind is not disclosed by them or by the trustees.

The two bonds and mortgages cover two separate parcels of realty, one of which is owned by a sister of one of the surviving trustees, and the other is owned by the wife of the same trustee and in which premises the trustee resides. The nonexercise of the power is alleged to be occasioned by the fact that the executor of the deceased trustee favors distribution in kind, while the trustee, whose sister and wife are the owners of the mortgaged premises, seeks to have the mortgages sold at a discount, and *114the other surviving trustee states he is indifferent as to which course of action is followed.

The liquidation of these estate assets is not however the concern of the executor of the deceased trustee. That duty is cast solely upon the surviving trustees. Unanimity of action by the trustees, which is the rule in the absence of an express testamentary provision or exceptional circumstances *(Matter of Luckenbach,*303 N. Y. 491), is, therefore, possible in the matter of the disposition of these two mortgages. The relationship, however, of the owners of the mortgaged premises to the surviving trustee who seeks to sell the mortgages at a discount is very close. A sale at discount to either one or both of the owners of the mortgaged premises, or to other persons so related to either of the trustees would raise a doubt as to its validity and would be presumed to be in violation of the trust and of the duty of undivided loyalty by the trustees to the trust *(Matter of Fulton,*253 App. Div. 494).

There is not present in this case any honest difference of opinion, in view of the willingness of one of the surviving trustees to follow either course of action suggested with respect to the disposition of the mortgages. The trustees therefore are authorized to exercise their discretion, the exercise of which is not likely to be overruled by the court. Proceed accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

V.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, AND VMWARE, INC.,

Defendants.

Case Numbers:

6:20-cv-00473-ADA

6:20-cv-00475-ADA

6:20-cv-00476-ADA

6:20-cv-00477-ADA

6:20-cv-00480-ADA

6:20-cv-00481-ADA

6:20-cv-00482-ADA

6:20-cv-00485-ADA

6:20-cv-00486-ADA

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

V.

ZTE CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Case Numbers:

6:20-cv-00487-ADA

6:20-cv-00488-ADA

6:20-cv-00489-ADA

6:20-cv-00490-ADA

6:20-cv-00491-ADA

6:20-cv-00492-ADA

6:20-cv-00493-ADA

6:20-cv-00494-ADA

6:20-cv-00495-ADA

6:20-cv-00496-ADA

6:20-cv-00497-ADA

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

V.

GOOGLE, LLC,

Defendant.

Case Numbers:

6:20-cv-00572-ADA

6:20-cv-00579-ADA

6:20-cv-00580-ADA

6:20-cv-00584-ADA

6:20-cv-00585-ADA

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 167-1 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 3
WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

V.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case Numbers:

6:20-cv-00725-ADA

6:20-cv-00726-ADA

6:20-cv-00728-ADA

6:20-cv-00730-ADA

6:20-cv-00783-ADA

GOOGLE, LLC,

Petitioner,

V.

TERRIER SSC, LLC,

Respondent.

Case Number:

6:21-cv-01269-ADA

GOOGLE, LLC,

Petitioner,

V.

BP FUNDING TRUST,

Respondent.

Case Number:

6:21-cv-01270-ADA

GOOGLE, LLC,

Petitioner,

V.

AQUA LICENSING, LLC,

Respondent.

Case Number:

6:21-cv-01309-ADA

DECLARATION OF CASEY J. MCCRACKEN 

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 167-1 Filed 03/14/22 Page 2 of 3
1

I, Casey J. McCracken declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney permitted to practice law before this Court pro hac vice and am 

licensed to practice law in the state of California. I am an associate with the law firm of Gibson, 

Dunn & Crutcher LLP and counsel of record for Defendants Dell Technologies, Inc., Dell Inc., 

and EMC Corporation in the above-captioned matters. I submit this declaration in support of the 

Joinder of the Dell Defendants in Google’s Motion to Compel Responses to Subpoena from 

BasePoint. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated below, and, if called as a witness, could 

and would testify to them under oath.

2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the subpoena served to 

BasePoint dated August 20, 2021. 

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of an email from 

BasePoint’s counsel to Dell’s counsel, dated October 8, 2021. 

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of a letter from 

BasePoint’s counsel to Dell’s counsel, dated November 11, 2021.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is

true and correct and that this declaration was executed in Irvine, California on March 14, 2022.

Casey J. McCracken

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 167-1 Filed 03/14/22 Page 3 of 3
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1573

DIANE PETTY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Frank D. Whitney , District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv

- 00012

- FDW )

Submitted : January 26, 2021 Decided: February 24, 2021

Before AGEE, KEENAN , and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

George C. Piemonte , MARTIN JONES & PIEMONTE, PC , Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. David Nathaniel Mervis , Office of General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION , Balt imore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Diane Petty seeks to appeal the district court’s order upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of Petty’s application s for disabil ity insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party in a civil case, the notice of appeal m ust be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court entered its order on March 20, 2020 , and the notice of appeal was due on May 19, 202 0 . Petty filed the notice of appeal on May 20, 2020. Because Petty failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, w e deny the Commissioner’s motion for abeyance a nd Petty’s motion to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



AMENDMENT   Mountain National Bank
Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement
 THIS AMENDMENT
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 The Following Articles Amended in their Entirety:
 ARTICLE IV: DEFINITIONS
 I. Disability
  ARTICLE V: RETIREMENT BENEFIT AND POST-RETIREMENT DEATH BENEFIT
 th




---



##### 



ARTICLE X: CHANGE OF CONTROL
 th
 IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE
 WITNESS:
    
    FOR MOUNTAIN NATIONAL BANK:Michael Patterson
    
    /s/ Michael L. Brown(name)
    
    (signature of authorized officer of Plan Sponsor)/s/ Michael Patterson
    
    Michael L. Brown(signature of witness)
    
    (print name)VP/HR
    
    Executive Vice President(title if any)
    
    (title of signing officer)THE EXECUTIVE:/s/ Dwight B. Grizzell(signature)Dwight B. Grizzell(print name)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC
FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS. </LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>               OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                 19,935
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         202,343
<ALLOWANCES>                           (4,302)
<INVENTORY>                           191,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      450,273
<PP&E>                                279,314
<DEPRECIATION>                       (155,828)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        618,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 197,748
<BONDS>                                78,436
<COMMON>                               47,722
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                            277,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          618,522
<SALES>                               624,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      624,267
<CGS>                                 527,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         527,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       81,465
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      8,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        15,297
<INCOME-TAX>                            5,673
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    12,512
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           12,512
<EPS-BASIC>                            0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.45



</TABLE>
Exhibit 15



November 5, 2004



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, Northwest

Washington, D.C. 20549

Attn: Document Control



Commissioners:



We are aware that our report dated October 28, 2004, on our review of the interim condensed consolidated financial information of 7-Eleven,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 2004, and for the three-month and nine-month periods then ended, and included in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended, is incorporated by
reference in the following Registration Statements:





|                                                                             |  |                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|On Form S-8 for:                                                             |  | Registration No.      
|                                                                             | 
|7-Eleven, Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan                                     |  | 33-63617and 333-107574
|                                                                             | 
|7-Eleven, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Eligible Employees |  | 333-42731             
|                                                                             | 
|7-Eleven, Inc. Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors            |  | 333-68491             



Very truly yours,



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Dallas, Texas