alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5611 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain swimming pools. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. ELLISON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain swimming pools. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SWIMMING POOLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Children’s inflatable swimming pools of polyvinyl 

chloride, not exceeding 

1.651 meters in diameter 

(provided for in subheading 9506.99.55) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5611 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1   Rival Technologies, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Rival Technologies,
Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:  1. the annual report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and  2. the information contained in the Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.  Date:  April 2, 2008
/s/ Douglas B. Thomas
Douglas B. Thomas
Chief Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

BRYANT C. JONES, Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD Respondent.

____________________

2010-3074

______________________ Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in Case No. CH0752090905-I-1.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

G REGORY T. M ITCHELL , Law Office of Gregory T. Mitchell, of Homewood, Illinois, argued for petitioner.

D AVID S. B ROOKS , Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were J AMES M. E ISENMANN , General Counsel, and K EISHA D AWN B ELL , Deputy General Counsel.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (B RYSON
, S CHALL , and PROST
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

November 2, 2010

—————————— Date /s/ Jan Horbaly

—————————— Jan Horbaly Clerk
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132616 & (16) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132616 

 COA: 270185 

Ingham CC: 97-072941-FH

DANIEL RAY WITHERELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED. 

d0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
<TABLE>

                                                     Exhibit 11.1

                SEQUA CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
      COMPUTATIONS OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
              FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
          (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>
                                                1998       1997
                                                ----       ----
<S>                                           <C>        <C>    
BASIC
-----
 Earnings
   Net income                                 $ 4,818    $ 1,525
   Preferred dividends                           (625)      (763)
                                              -------    -------

   Net income available to common
     stockholders                             $ 4,193    $   762
                                              =======    =======

 Shares
   Weighted average common shares
     outstanding                               10,067      9,917
                                              =======    =======
 
 Basic earnings per share                     $   .42    $   .08
                                              =======    =======

DILUTED *
-------
  Earnings
    Net income                                $ 4,818    $ 1,525
    Preferred dividends                          (625)      (763)
                                              -------   --------

    Net income available to common
      stockholders                            $ 4,193    $   762
                                              =======    =======

  Shares
    Weighted average common shares
      outstanding                              10,067      9,917
    Stock options, with a dilutive effect          68         42
                                              -------    -------
    Adjusted weighted average common
      shares outstanding                       10,135      9,959
                                              =======    =======

  Diluted earnings per share                  $   .41    $   .08
                                              =======    =======



<FN>
*  The conversion of the Company's preferred stock is
   antidilutive in all periods presented when the preferred stock
   dividends are added back to income applicable to common stock.
</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.3 PO BOX 84013
Columbus GA 31908-4013
Tel. 800,784,5566 (GREENPOINT MORTGAGE LOGO) To: RWT Holdings, Inc. Re: Annual Statement as to Compliance by the Seller Pursuant to Section 6.04 of the Mortgage Loan Flow Purchase, Sale, and
Servicing Agreement between Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. as Seller (the
Seller) and RWT Holdings, Inc. as Purchaser, dated as of August 1, 2002 (the
Agreement), the undersigned officer of the Seller, hereby certifies as to
the following: (i) a review of the activities of the Seller during the calendar
year ended December 31, 2003 (the Applicable Period) and of the
Sellers performance under the Agreement has been made under the direct
supervision of the undersigned officer; and (ii) to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on
such review, the Seller has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement throughout the Applicable Period, and there has been no known
default in the fulfillment of the Sellers obligations throughout such
Applicable Period. Very Truly YoursGREENPOINT MORTGAGEFUNDING, INC.As Seller/s/ Roy BriggsRoy BriggsTitle: Vice President
 [SPANISH LANGUAGE]  2300 Brookstone Centre Pkwy Columbus GA 31904Customer Service Hours: Monday - Friday, 8:30 AM - 8:00 PM, Eastern www.greenpointservice.com
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26008]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Appointments to Recertification Performance Review Boards for the 
Senior Executive Service

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Appointment to Recertification Performance Review Boards for 
the Senior Executive Service.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has announced the 
following appointments to NRC Recertification Performance Review 
Boards.
    The following individuals are appointed as members of the NRC 
Recertification Performance Review Board (PRB) responsible for making 
recommendations to the appointing and awarding authorities on 
recertification for Senior Executives:

Appointees

Patricia G. Norry, Deputy Executive Director for Management Services, 
Chair
Ellis Merschoff, Regional Administrator, Region IV
Stephen G. Burns, Deputy General Counsel
    The following individuals are appointed as members of the NRC 
Recertification PRB Panel responsible for making recommendations to the 
appointing and awarding authorities on recertification of 
Recertification PRB members:

Appointees

Jesse L. Funches, Chief Financial Officer, Chair
Frank Miraglia, Deputy Executive Director for Reactor Programs
Dennis Rathbun, Director, Office of Congressional Affairs
    All appointments are made pursuant to section 4314 of chapter 43 of 
title 5 of the United States Code.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 11, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn J. Swanson, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 (301) 415-7530.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of September, 2000.

    For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Carolyn J. Swanson,
 Secretary, Executive Resources Board
[FR Doc. 00-26008 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         584,184
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,692,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,997
<INVENTORY>                                    998,248
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,353,950
<PP&E>                                       2,760,045
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,348,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,765,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,138,022
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,051,149
<COMMON>                                     3,243,230
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,765,411
<SALES>                                      2,671,438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,671,438
<CGS>                                        1,260,153
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,260,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,406,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,686
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,686
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,686
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Order filed September 27, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00404

- CR

____________ ISAAC ZUNIGA GUTIE RREZ , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1514075



### ORDER
The reporter’s record was due June 26, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. A partial reporter’s record consisting of one of seven volumes was filed by court reporter Lindsay Arredondo on July 2, 2018. We have not received a request for
extension of time to file the remainder of the record.

We order Gail Rol en, the official court reporter of the 178th District Court, to file the remainder of the reporter’s record by October 12, 2018

. PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Nadav Kidron, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 10-KSB of Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to date
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated
financial statements, and other financial information included this annual
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this annual report;

4. The small business issuers other
certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period which this report
is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in
the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the
small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
small business issuers control over financial reporting.

5. The small business issuers other
certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
small business issuers internal controls and procedures for financial
reporting.

Date: December 14, 2006

By: /s/ Nadav Kidron

Nadav Kidron, Chief Executive Officer
and President (Principal Executive Officer)

---
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Peter G. Savas, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Life Sciences, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) [Not Applicable];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        DATE: May 15, 2007 /s/ Peter G.Savas   **Peter G. Savas**   **Chief Executive Officer**
**Exhibit 32**

**NORTHERN GROWERS, LLC**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

The undersigned, Robert Narem, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer and the Chief Financial Officer of Northern Growers, LLC (the “Company”),has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

·                  the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

·                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thisCertification as of the 16th day of March, 2007.

 
|        | /s/ Robert Narem                            |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | Robert Narem                                |
|   | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial |
|   | Officer                                     |

 

1

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2751 

To amend the Small Business Act to prohibit the use of reverse auctions 

for design and construction services procurements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2013 

Mr. HANNA (for himself, Mr. GRAVES of Missouri, and Ms. MENG) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to prohibit the use of 

reverse auctions for design and construction services procurements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commonsense Con5 struction Contracting Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REVERSE AUCTIONS PROHIBITED FOR CONTRACTS 

7 FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES. 

8 The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) is 

9 amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2751 IH

1 (1) by redesignating section 47 as section 48; 

2 and 

3 (2) by inserting after section 46 the following: 

4 ‘‘SEC. 47. REVERSE AUCTIONS PROHIBITED FOR CON5 TRACTS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 

6 SERVICES. 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any contract for 

8 design and construction services, reverse auction methods 

9 may not be used if the contract— 

10 ‘‘(1) is suitable for award to a small business 

11 concern; or 

12 ‘‘(2) if the award is to be made under— 

13 ‘‘(A) section 8(a); 

14 ‘‘(B) section 8(m); 

15 ‘‘(C) section 15(a); 

16 ‘‘(D) section 15(j); 

17 ‘‘(E) section 31; or 

18 ‘‘(F) section 36. 

19 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— 

20 ‘‘(1) The term ‘reverse auction’ means, with re21 spect to procurement by an agency, a real-time auc22 tion on the Internet between a group of offerors who 

23 compete against each other by submitting bids for a 

24 contract or task order with the ability to submit re25 vised bids throughout the course of the auction, and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2751 IH

1 the award being made to the offeror who submits 

2 the lowest bid. 

3 ‘‘(2) The term ‘design and construction serv4 ices’ means— 

5 ‘‘(A) site planning and landscape design; 

6 ‘‘(B) architectural and interior design; 

7 ‘‘(C) engineering system design; 

8 ‘‘(D) performance of construction work for 

9 facility, infrastructure, and environmental res10 toration projects; 

11 ‘‘(E) delivery and supply of construction 

12 materials to construction sites; and 

13 ‘‘(F) construction, alteration, or repair, in14 cluding painting and decorating, of public build15 ings and public works.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS