alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2678 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2678

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  10360 Southwest 186th Street in Miami, Florida, as the ``Larcenia J. 
                     Bullard Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LARCENIA J. BULLARD POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10360 Southwest 186th Street in Miami, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Larcenia J. Bullard Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Larcenia 
J. Bullard Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Opinion filed April 19 , 201 2



## In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ 

### No. 11

- 12

- 00104

- C R

__________ IN RE HORACIO JOSE DOHNAL

O riginal Mandamus Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appearing pro se, relator Horacio Jose Dohnal, a prison inmate, has filed a petition for
writ of mandamus. In his petition, relator asserts that the district judge of the 35th District Court of Brown County has failed to rule on his motion for an out

- of

- time appeal. He requests an order from this court directing the district judge to rule on his motion. Finding we lack jurisdiction, we will dismiss the petition. We first note that relator has not filed a proper record or appendix wi th his petition. In an original mandamus proceeding, the petition must be accompanied by a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to a relato r’ s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.7(a)(1). R elator has not filed any documents supporting his mandamus petition. Thus, relator ’ s petition states facts not supported by evidence included in an appendix or record. A relator ’ s burden on mandamus includes meeting the requirement that “[e ]very statement of fact in the petition [is] supported by citation to competent evidence included in the appendix or record.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.3(g). In short, a relator must supply a2

record sufficient to establish the right to mandamus relief. See Wal ker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992).
While relator ’ s failure to comply with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52 would ordinarily require denial of his petition, we must dispose of this proceeding on a different ground. The substance of the
relief that relator seeks by mandamus is essentially a request for postc onviction habeas corpus relief because he is seeking an order from this court in support of his request for an out

- of

- time appeal. Article 11.07 vests complete jurisdiction over postconviction relief fro m final felony convictions in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN . art. 11.07 ( West Supp. 2011 ); Hoang v. State , 872 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Ater v. Eighth
Ct

. of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is the only court with jurisdiction to consider a motion for an out

- of

- time appeal. See
Ater , 802 S.W.2d at 243 . The appropriate vehicle for seeking an out

- of

- time appeal is by

purs u ing a writ of habeas corpus from the Court of Criminal Appeals pursuant to A rticle 11.07. Portley v. State , 89 S.W.3d 188, 189 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana 2002, no pet.)

. The courts of appeals have no authority to issue writs of mandamus in criminal law matters perta ining to proceedings under A rticle 11.07. In re McAfee , 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1 st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we dismiss relator ’ s petition for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

April 19 , 2012 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Kalenak , J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                             5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1000

<S>                                                 <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            29157
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    286944
<ALLOWANCES>                                       5828
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 412502
<PP&E>                                           373110
<DEPRECIATION>                                   152935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   851892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            541711
<BONDS>                                           21241
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          17731
<OTHER-SE>                                       218173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     851892
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 576408
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    602417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 3915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (62480) <F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (10000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (52480)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (52480)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (4.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.02)
<FN>
<F1>Includes General and Administrative Expenses of  $33,639 and interest income
of $1,083 not reflected on this tag list.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

             CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND
             FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of St. Joseph, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I John H. Simmons,
President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


/s/John H. Simmons
------------------
John H. Simmons
President/Director
April 14, 2004
WACO

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00474-ADA

ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY DISCOVERY HEARING HEARING BY ZOOM

January 19, 2021 01:30 PM

vs.

14th day of January, 2021.

Alan D Albright

IT IS SO ORDERED this

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

§

§

§

§

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., §

EMC CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

DISCOVERY HEARING BY ZOOM on Tuesday, January 19, 2021 at 01:30 PM. The link

for the hearing will be sent by e-mail.

Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 73 Filed 01/14/21 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5387 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5387

     To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Solvent Orange 115.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Ms. Fudge introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Solvent Orange 115.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOLVENT ORANGE 115.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         Solvent Orange     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          115 (CAS No.                                                      12/31/2015
                          53304-32-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3204.19.25)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Sam BANKS et al., Appellants, v. Crockett WATSON, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 5, 1954.

Faulkner & Faulkner, W. E. Faulkner, Hazard, for appellants.

S. M. Ward, Don A. Ward, E. C. Wooton, Hazard, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Perry Circuit Court. R. C. Littleton, Special Judge.

We are affirming the judgment for $500 in this case because we think (1) there was sufficient evidence to submit the case to the jury; (2) the verdict was not excessive; and (3) it was not error to refuse tp grant a continuance because of Witt’s absence at the trial.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 9, 2010 

d0830 

Order 

 

September 9, 2010 

141194 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141194 

 COA: 296562 

Genesee CC: 07-020153-FC 

CECIL RAY THORNTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I 

was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
SEATTLE	SEAPLANES

1325	Fairview	Ave	E

Seattle,	WA		98102

February	28th 2013

To	Whom	It	May	Concern:

Please	accept	this	letter	as	an	exemption	request	from	the	requirement	for	a	

separate	testing	program	for	our	air	tour	operations.

Per	the	exemption	instructions	the	following	information	is	being	provided:

						A)			Seattle	Seaplanes

							1325	Fairview	Ave	E

						 Seattle,	WA	 98102

							Telephone	:		 206-329-9638

								Fax:															 		206-325-5885

								E-mail:												lindachrysler@hotmail.com

B)	This	request	letter	is	for	exemption	from	14	CFR	91.147	titled:	Passenger	

carrying	flights	for	compensation	or	hire.

							C) Extent	of	relief	is	to	combine	Seattle	Seaplanes	Part	191	tour	pilots	with																																								

Chrysler,	James	safety	sensitive	personnel	in	the	same	DOT	random	drug	and	

alcohol	testing	pool.		This	would	allow	better	control	of	Seattle	Seaplanes	

employees	as	a	whole	and	allow	our	small	company	with	limited	personnel	the	

ability	to comply	with	regulations	in	a	more	efficient	manner.		

						 D)	This	request	will	benefit	the	public	as	a	whole	by	allowing	our	small	staff	

to	utilize	its	experts	to	oversee	a	single	drug	and	alcohol	program.		It	will	

prevent	us	from	assigning	the	responsibilities	to	personnel	that	are	less	suited	to	

oversee	such	a	large	regulatory	requirement	such	as	drug	and	alcohol	testing	

program	and	all	of	the	regulations	that	go	with	it.

			

													 E) As	paragraph	D states,	safety	would	be	increased	by	allowing	are	

designated	experts	to	handle	those	duties	they	are	suited	for.		The	level	of	safety	

would	be	at	least	equal	to	if	not	increased	by	better	over	sight	and	compliance.
February	28,	2013

Page	Two

Exemption Request	

Seattle	Seaplanes

								F) To	summarize	for	the	Federal	Register;	Seattle	Seaplanes	would like	to	

request	an	exemption	from	14	CFR	91.147	by	being	allowed	to	combine	Seattle	

Seaplanes	part	91	pilots	with	Chrysler	James	Part	135, safety	sensitive	personnel,	in	

the	same	DOT	Random	Drug	and	Alcohol	testing	pool.			All	of	the	same	drug/alcohol	

testing	rules	and	regulations	will	still	apply	to	all	pilots	and	mechanics	in	the	

combine	pool.

					G) This	request	for	a	combined	drug	program	should	be	fairly	common	for	a	

company	such	as	Seattle	Seaplanes	that	have	multiply	departments	that	contain	

safety	sensitive	positions.		Simply	stated,	why	have	3	or	4	people	performing	the	

same	exact	functions	for	a	company	that	has	so	few	safety	sensitive	employees?

This	exemption	will	prevent	this	and	allow	a	more	complete	oversight	of	the	

regulations	and	a	much	easier,	therefore,	safer	compliance.

					H) Although	Aviation	is	a	World	Wide	industry, Seattle	Seaplanes	will	only	

conduct	our	drug/alcohol	testing	within	the	50	states	of	the	USA.		Any	flights	

beyond	US	borders	will	be	conducted	by	employees	tested	and	regulated	here	

within	the	US.

Thank	you	for	your	consideration.

Sincerely	yours,

Linda	D.	Chrysler
Exhibit 23.2
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
  We refer to our report entitled "Report on Reserves Data by Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor" dated February 23, 2012, evaluating the reserves attributable to Sonde Resources Corp. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2011 (the "Report").
  We hereby consent to references to our name and to the Report in the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We also confirm that we have read the Annual Information Form included in the Annual Report on Form 40-F and that we have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained in it that are derived from the Report or that are within our knowledge as a result of the services we performed in connection with the Report. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of the Report into the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-176261).
   Yours truly,GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD./s/ John H. StillingJohn H. Stilling, P. Eng.Vice-President
  Calgary, Alberta
  March 22, 2012
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5629 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cerium sulfide pigments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cerium 

sulfide pigments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERIUM SULFIDE PIGMENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.90 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 cerium sulfide pigments) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5629 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2444]

Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification have been filed in the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by October 30, 2000. See section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired.

*Subject:*                     Amendment of Section 73.202(b) of the Commission's Rules FM Broadcast Station Johannesburg and Edwards, California (MM Docket No. 99-239).                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                

*Subject:*                     Amendment of Part 1 of the Commission's Rules—Competitive Bidding Procedures (WT Docket No. 97-82).                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     5.                

Federal Communications Commission. 

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26399  Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50387 Summary Calendar

LYNN C. GUTHRIE; GINA LYNN GUTHRIE,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants

v. DITECH FINANCIAL, L.L.C., formerly known as Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C.,

Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:16

- CV

- 171

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Proceeding pro se as they did in the district court, Plaintiffs

- Appellants appeal the April 20, 2017 Final Judgment of that court dismissing all of their claims and causes of action without prejudice. We have carefully reviewed
the record on appeal, including the briefs of the parties , the exhaustive April 20, 2017 Order of the district court , and the even more exhaustive Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge to whom the district court initially

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 24, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50387 Document: 00514208110 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2017No. 17

- 50387

2 assigned this matter. A s a result , we are convinced beyond cav i l that the aforesaid Final Judgment of the dist rict court is not only free of error but

e minently correct . For essentially the same reasons as explicated by the district court and the magistrate judge, the judgment a ppealed from is, in all respects,

AFFIRMED. Case: 17-50387 Document: 00514208110 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5424 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear for girls with outer 

soles of rubber, plastics, leather, or composition leather and uppers 

of leather, not covering the ankle. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. HUELSKAMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear for 

girls with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather, or composition leather and uppers of leather, not covering the 

ankle. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR FOR GIRLS WITH OUTER 

4 SOLES OF RUBBER, PLASTICS, LEATHER, OR 

5 COMPOSITION LEATHER AND UPPERS OF 

6 LEATHER, NOT COVERING THE ANKLE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5424 IH

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Nonenumerated footwear 

with outer soles of rubber, 

plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of 

leather, not covering the 

ankle, for girls (provided for 

in subheading 6403.59.90) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS