alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

MELODY JOY CANTU and

DR. RODRIGO CANTU,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. SA-20-CV-0746-JKP

DR. SANDRA GUERRA and 

DIGITAL FORENSICS 

CORPORATION, 

Defendants.

ORDER DENYING CONTINUANCE

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion for an Ends of Justice Continuance of Trial

(ECF No. 125). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), Plaintiffs seek to continue the September 11, 

2023 trial set in this case. Defendants have filed a response (ECF No. 127) to oppose the continuance, but they also state that, if the Court grants the continuance, it should leave the other deadlines 

in place, including the final pretrial conference set for September 7, 2023. The Court finds no need 

for a reply brief. 

Plaintiffs assert that the currently scheduled trial date conflicts with a previously scheduled 

criminal trial that requires the attention of two of their attorneys. The criminal case is set for hearing on August 30, 2023, and for trial to commence September 14, 2023. Counsel also has a scheduled pretrial conference in that same criminal case for September 6, 2023. Plaintiffs do not address 

the availability of their local counsel for trial. 

Given the nature of trials, the Court DENIES the motion for continuance without prejudice. Should the conflict remain through the date of the final pretrial conference in this case Plaintiffs may file another such motion. Within any such filing, Plaintiffs shall explain (1) why the 

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 128 Filed 08/15/23 Page 1 of 2
2

Court should not consider the availability of local counsel to handle trial and (2) why one of the 

two conflicted attorneys cannot handle this civil case. Although the present motion does not directly indicate any conflict with the currently scheduled pretrial conference in this case, if the 

pretrial conference poses logistical issues for counsel, the Court may permit counsel to appear via 

Zoom on proper motion. 

Two years ago, Plaintiffs and Dr. Guerra previously participated in unsuccessful mediation. 

See ECF No. 60. At the time, the mediating parties had no intent to further mediate the case. Notably, Defendant Digital Forensics Corporation did not participate in the prior mediation because 

it was without counsel. The contours of this case have changed materially since the Court’s recent 

rulings on summary judgment motions. If all parties jointly request a mediation referral to a United 

States Magistrate Judge, the Court will consider such motion and ascertain whether any magistrate 

judge has availability to conduct such a mediation before the scheduled pretrial conference in this 

case. But, with the rapidly approaching pretrial conference, mediation by a United States Magistrate Judge may not be feasible. Thus, if the parties are interested in further mediation, they are 

also encouraged to engage in private good faith settlement efforts. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of August 2023.

JASON PULLIAM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 128 Filed 08/15/23 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.2


 


 


 






    	 	1	 



     


    

 


 


 






    	 	2	 



     


    

 


 


 






    	 	3	 



     


    

 


 


 






    	 	4	 



     


    

 


 


 






    	 	5
**-.~**

'> 

### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICEOFHEARINGS 

# REC.EI·V·ED

WASHINGTON, D.C. · . 

## APR 2920t3 IN THE MATTER OF 

# HEARING DOCKET SCOTT NOVAK FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Proceeding) FDMS NO. FAA-20 12-0206



### COMPLAINANT'S NOTICE OF APPEAL
Pursuant to§ 13.233(a) ofthe Rules ofPractice, 14 C.P.R. § 13.233(a), Complainant hereby gives notice that it appeals the written initial decision served on April 11, 2013.
Submitted this the 19th day ofApril 2013. HOWARD L. MARTIN, JR Regional Counsel

# By:~ H. Brown Senior Attorney

1

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Re: Scott Novak FAA DocketNo. FDMS NO. FAA--=-20::-:-l-::-2--::-c02c-::-06 I hereby certify that onthis date I have served a copy ofthe Complainant's Notice ofAppeal by postage-prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested to the following: Joseph W. Geldhof 2 Marine Way, Suite 207 Juneau, AK 99801 I further certify that on this date I have served the original and two copies ofthe Complainant's Notice ofAppeal by postage-prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 DATED: 

# A.' , . __**j/~/**

## dZ:Z~~r: 

# LJatlP2f-4f,j Federal Aviation Administration 11 ;[ ti ' I Office ofRegional Counsel i/ 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, AAL-7 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         400,306
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  360,991
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,478
<INVENTORY>                                    308,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,080,424
<PP&E>                                       1,147,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                 681,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,047,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          666,118
<BONDS>                                        573,918
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        797
<COMMON>                                        11,006
<OTHER-SE>                                     664,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,047,132
<SALES>                                      1,256,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,256,817
<CGS>                                        1,004,506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,004,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (12,057)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,604
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,938
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,338
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,483)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,855
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.96


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Synnott B. Durham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sunair Electronics, Inc.;
1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thereport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
3. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) forthe registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
DATE: May 16, 2005   /s/ Synnott B. Durham  Synnott B. Durham  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer  
 - 23 -
EXHIBIT 32.2


          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunair Electronics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 16, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Synnott
B. Durham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Synnott B. Durham
-------------------------------------
Synnott B. Durham
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
August 16, 2004
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.3 PO Box 84013
Columbus GA 31908-4013
Tel. 800.784.5566 (GREENPOINT MORTGAGE LOGO) To : RWT Holdings, Inc. Re: Annual Statement as to Compliance by the Seller Pursuant to Section 6.04 of the Mortgage Loan Flow Purchase, Sale, and
Servicing Agreement between Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. as Seller (the
Seller) and RWT Holdings, Inc. as Purchaser, dated as of August 1, 2002 (the
Agreement), the undersigned officer of the Seller, hereby certifies as 10
the following: (i) a review of the activities of the Seller during the calendar
year ended December 31, 2003 (the Applicable Period) and of the
Sellers performance under the Agreement has bean made under the direct
supervision of the undersigned officer; and (ii) to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on
such review, the Seller has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement throughout the Applicable Period, and there has been no known
default in the fulfillment of the Sellers obligations throughout such
Applicable Period. Very Truly Yours
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE
FUNDING, INC.
As Saller/s/ Roy BriggsRoy BriggsTitle : Vice President [SPANISH LANGUAGE] 2300 Brookstone Centre Pkwy Columbus GA 31904
Customer Service Hours: Monday - Friday, 8:30 AM - 8:00 PM, Eastern
 www.greenpointservice.com
#### ARISPE v. STATE.

No. 24010.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 18, 1948.

Mayen & Kennedy, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*558HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for felony theft, punishment two years in the penitentiary. Appellant filed a motion advising this court that he desired to have his appeal dismissed. Later, for reasons satisfactory to the court he requested permission to withdraw his motion to dismiss the appeal, which permission was granted.

The case is before us on the record which contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. What purports to be a bill of exception complaining of the refusal of a continuance appears in the transcript but the bill is not approved by the trial judge. It therefore cannot be considered.

Nothing being presented for review the judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 99.9**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report ofCanadian Superior Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ross A. Jones, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  March 31, 2006

 
|   | By:    | /s/ ROSS A.  JONES |                     |
|--------|--------|--------------------|--------------------------|
|   |   | Name:              | Ross A. Jones            |
|   |   | Title:             | Chief  Financial Officer |
|        |        |                    |                          |  |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Al
      Kraus, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of MedaSorb Technologies
      Corporation; and





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report.




Date: April
              30,2007
            By:
            /s/ Al
              KrausAl
              Kraus,Chief
              Executive Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2682 

To prohibit the funding of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2013 

Mr. GRAVES of Georgia (for himself, Mr. BRIDENSTINE, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. 

STOCKMAN, Mr. JONES, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. COTTON, Mr. 

PALAZZO, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. 

PITTENGER, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. 

WENSTRUP, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. GINGREY of 

Georgia, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. MULVANEY, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. BARTON, Mr. OLSON, Mr. HALL, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. DESANTIS, Mr. 

HUELSKAMP, Mr. POSEY, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. SCALISE, and Mr. YOHO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and 

Means, Education and the Workforce, Natural Resources, the Judiciary, 

and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the funding of the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2682 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defund Obamacare 

3 Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, no Federal funds shall be made available to 

7 carry out any provisions of the Patient Protection and Af8 fordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148) or title I and 

9 subtitle B of title II of the Health Care and Education 

10 Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152), or of 

11 the amendments made by either such Act. 

12 (b) LIMITATION.—No entitlement to benefits under 

13 any provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable 

14 Care Act (Public Law 111–148) or title I and subtitle B 

15 of title II of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation 

16 Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152), or the amendments 

17 made by either such Act, shall remain in effect on and 

18 after the date of the enactment of this Act, nor shall any 

19 payment be awarded, owed, or made to any State, District, 

20 or territory under any such provision. 

21 (c) UNOBLIGATED BALANCES.—Notwithstanding any 

22 other provision of law, all unobligated balances available 

23 under the provisions of law referred to in subsection (a) 

24 are hereby rescinded. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 7

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 1 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 2 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 3 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 4 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 5 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 6 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 7 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 8 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 9 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 10 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 11 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 12 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 13 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 14 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 15 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 16 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 17 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 18 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 19 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 20 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 21 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 22 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 23 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 24 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 25 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 26 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 27 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 28 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 29 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 30 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 31 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 32 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 33 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 34 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 35 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 36 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 37 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 38 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 39 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 40 of 41
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 71-24 Filed 04/14/23 Page 41 of 41
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Scott W. Fordham, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of TIER REIT, Inc.; and

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Dated this   16th day of April, 2019 | /s/ Scott W. Fordham |
|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                      | Name:                | Scott W. Fordham |
|                                      | Title:               | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elizabeth Arden, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Scott Beattie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Stephen J. Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge: 

(i)**      **The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii)**      **The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

of

Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Brian
P. MacDonald, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sunoco, Inc., certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sunoco, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 5, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Brian P. MacDonald                           
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Brian P. MacDonald                               
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer