alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5657-5658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2514]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-030-00-2822-M948: GPO-0099]


Emergency Motor Vehicle Use Limitations; Lincoln Fire; Oregon

AGENCY:  Bureau of Land Management, Vale District, Oregon, Department 
of the Interior.

ACTION:  A temporary closure to motor vehicle use on public lands 
within the area of the Lincoln Fire (M948) administered by the Bureau 
of Land Management (BLM), Malheur Resource Area, Vale District, Oregon.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  One June 24, 1999 the Lincoln Fire burned 1415 acres of 
public and private land within T.19S., R.46E., Williamette Meridian, 
Sections 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33. Because of the damage caused by 
the fire, this closure is necessary to prevent erosion and enhance the 
fire rehabilitation efforts within the burned area. The authorized 
officer has determined that vehicle use other than on designated routes 
will cause considerable adverse effects upon recovering soil and 
vegetation resources in the burned area and may also limit the 
successful establishment of desirable vegetation or other proposed 
rehabilitation actions.
    Open roads within the fire area will be clearly identified. A map 
designating those routes which will remain open to vehicle use is 
included in the Vale District Bureau of Land Management, Lincoln Fire 
Rehabilitation Plan M948, Environmental Assessment (EA No. OR-030-99-
021). The map and plan can be reviewed at: Vale District Office, USDI 
Bureau of Land Management, 100 East Oregon Street, Vale, Oregon 97918.
    Prohibited Act: Pursuant to 43 CFR 8364.1, motorized vehicle use is 
prohibited on public land within the

[[Page 5658]]

boundaries of the Lincoln Fire (M948), except on designated roads.
    Penalties: The authority for this closure is found under section 
303(a) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 
1733 (a)) and 43 CFR 8360.0-7. Any person who knowingly and willfully 
violates this closure may be tried before a United States Magistrate 
and fined no more than $1,000 or imprisoned no more than 12 months, or 
both. Such violations may also be subject to the enhanced fines 
provided for by Title 18 U.S.C. 3571.

DATES:  This closure will take effect upon the published date of this 
notice and will continue for one year.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Roy L. Masinton, Field Office 
Manager, Malheur Resource Area, Vale District Office, 100 Oregon 
Street, Vale, OR 97914, Telephone--(541) 473-3144.

    Dated: January 28, 2000.
Roy L. Masinton,
Field Office Manager, Malheur Resource Area.
[FR Doc. 00-2514 Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-3909

___________

In re: Marilyn M. Moss, also *

known as Marilyn M. Bryant, *

also known as Marilyn Margaret *

Bryant, also known as Marilyn Moss *

Bryant, also known as M. Margaret *

Bryant, also known as Marilyn Wall *

Bryant, also known as Margaret *

Whitman Bryant, also known as *

Margaret “Peggy” Whitman, also *

known as Margaret Whitman “Peggy” *

Bryant, also known as Margaret *

Bryant, also known as Marge Bryant, *

also known as Mari Bryant, also known *

as Mary Bryant, also known as Anne * Appeal from the United States

Bryant, also known as Ann Whitman, * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

also known as P. M. Whitman, also * for the Eighth Circuit.

known as Anne Margaret Whitman, *

also known as Anne M. Whitman * [UNPUBLISHED]

Bryant, also known as Anne Margaret *

Whitman Bryant, also known as Anne *

Margaret Whitman Bryant Trust, also *

known as M. Whitman Bryant, also *

known as M. Margaret Whitman *

Bryant, also known as Catherine L. *

Whitman, also known as Bryant Family *

Trust, also known as Solutions, Inc., *

also known as Santa Barbara Mortgage *

Co., Inc., also known as National *

Supply Corporation, also known as TCI *

Industries, also known as TCI *

Investments, also known as T.N. Ayrb *
1

The Honorable Jerry W. Venters, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.

-2-

Inv. Co., also known as *

Transpacific Conservancy, Inc., also *

known as M. Margaret Whitman *

Bryant Trust Dated April 18, 1997, *

also known as M. Margaret Whitman *

Bryant Trust Dated May 18, 1997, *

*

Debtor, *

*

----------------------------- *

*

Marilyn M. Moss, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Burton & Norris; Gronemeier & *

Barker, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: July 2, 2002

 Filed: July 9, 2002

___________

Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Debtor Marilyn Moss appeals the bankruptcy appellate panel’s affirmance of

the bankruptcy court’s1

 order overruling her objections to her creditors’ proof of
-3-

claim. Reviewing the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact for clear error and its

conclusions of law de novo, see In re Zepecki, 277 F.3d 1041, 1045 (8th Cir. 2002)

(per curiam), we find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF
2002

I, D. MARK BRISTOW, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Randgold Resources Limited; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 31, 2012



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/s/ D. Mark Bristow                    
|                                       
|D. Mark Bristow Chief
Executive Officer
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Mann, Chief Financial Officer of Amarc Resources Ltd.
(the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 (the Annual Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:  | September 30, 2009     
|------ | -----------------------
|       |                        
|       | /s/ Paul Mann          
|       |                        
|By:    | Paul Mann              
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
Exhibit 5.2   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the annual report of Canadian Superior Energy Inc.
(the Company) on Form 40-F/A for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert A. Pilling, Vice President and Secretary,  the principal financial officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.  Dated:  May 23,  2003  /s/ Robert A. PillingName:
  Robert PillingTitle:
  Vice President and Secretary  A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Canadian
Superior Energy Inc. (the Company) and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



                                               Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Stephan Co. (the "Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Frank F. Ferola, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



/s/ Frank F. Ferola
__________________________________
Frank F. Ferola
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2004
NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ CARYN C. SCHWAB,

Claimant

- Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2022

- 1981

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 20

- 7178, Judge Coral Wong Pietsch.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K ENNETH M. C ARPENTER , Law Offices of Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant

- appellant.

G ALINA I. F OMENKOVA , Commercial Litigation Branch,Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent

- appellee. Also represented by B RIAN M. B OYNTON , M ATTHEW J UDE C ARHART , E LIZABETH M ARIE H OSFORD , P ATRICIA M. M C C ARTHY ; J ULIE H ONAN , Y. Case: 22-1981 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 12/06/2023K EN L EE , Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (M OORE , Chief Judge

, H UGHES and S TARK , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 6, 2023 Date Case: 22-1981 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 12/06/2023
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard Fisher, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Cytation Corporation; 
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2004

/s/Richard Fishser____________ 
Richard Fisher 
Chairman and General Counsel
**PROMISSORY
        NOTE**
 TO
 MRS.
        PHYLLIS L. BELL
 
 
 $35,000.00
              February
                  22, 2005
 
 
 For
        value
        received, STAF*TEK SERVICES, INC., of Tulsa, Oklahoma, (herein referred to
        as
‘maker’) promises to pay to the order of PHYLLIS L. BELL, (herein referred to as
        ‘payee’) on or before March 1, 2005, the principal sum of Thirty Five Thousand
        and No/100 Dollars ($35,000.00), plus $100.00.
 
 Payment
        of this note shall be as follows: One lump sum payment of $35,000.00 plus
        $100.00 interest.
 
 Maker
        may
        prepay this note in whole or in part without penalty or surcharge at any
        time
        prior to the maturity date.
 
 The
        maker
        hereby severally waives presentment for payment, notice of nonpayment, protest
        and notice to protest, and aggress that extensions of the time for payment
        may
        be granted without notice. In case of legal proceedings to collect this note,
        maker agrees to pay all court costs including reasonable attorneys’ fees to
        payee as prevailing parties in the suit.
 
 IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is signed the 22 nd day of
        February, 2005.
 
 
 
 /s/
                  John H. SimmonsJohn
                  H. Simmons, President, C.E.O.Staf*Tek
                  Services, Inc.4870
                  S. Lewis St., Ste. 250Tulsa,
                  Oklahoma 74105[notary
                  stamp]/s/
                  Shelia Hobens2/22/05
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26729]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,600 and NAFTA-03998]


Trinity Industries, Incorporated, Mt. Orab, OH; Notice of 
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By letter of September 25, 2000 the petitioner requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of 
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance, 
applicable to petition numbers TA-W-37,600 and NAFTA 03998, 
respectively. The denial notices were signed on August 16, 2000 and 
published in the Federal Register on September 12, 2000 (65 FR 55049 
and 55050, respectively).
    The petitioner provided additional information about imports of 
coal cars which should have been considered by the Department in its 
survey of customers.

 Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 4th day of October 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-26729 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXHIBIT 28

Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 103-4 Filed 08/20/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 103-4 Filed 08/20/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 103-4 Filed 08/20/21 Page 3 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 103-4 Filed 08/20/21 Page 4 of 4
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2736 

To allow entities required to comply with orders or directives under the 

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to publicly report every 

90 days certain aggregate information related to the compliance with 

such orders or directives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2013 

Mr. LARSEN of Washington (for himself and Mr. AMASH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and 

in addition to the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To allow entities required to comply with orders or directives 

under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 

to publicly report every 90 days certain aggregate information related to the compliance with such orders or 

directives. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Government Surveil5 lance Transparency Act of 2013’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2736 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN AGGREGATE INFORMA2 TION RELATED TO ORDERS UNDER THE FOR3 EIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 

4 1978. 

5 (a) DISCLOSURES.—The Foreign Intelligence Surveil6 lance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following new title: 

8 ‘‘TITLE IX—DISCLOSURE OF CER9 TAIN AGGREGATE INFORMA10 TION 

11 ‘‘SEC. 901. DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN AGGREGATE INFOR12 MATION. 

13 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, 

14 each entity required to comply with an order or directive 

15 under this Act may, every 90 days with respect to the pre16 ceding 90-day period, make publicly available the following 

17 information: 

18 ‘‘(1) The aggregate number of orders or direc19 tives under this Act with which such entity was re20 quired to comply. 

21 ‘‘(2) A general description of the types of as22 sistance, information, or tangible things such entity 

23 was required to provide pursuant to such orders or 

24 directives. 

25 ‘‘(3) The aggregate number of each type of as26 sistance, information, or tangible things such entity 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2736 IH

1 was required to provide pursuant to such orders or 

2 directives. 

3 ‘‘(4) The aggregate number of user accounts 

4 with respect to which such entity was required to 

5 provide assistance, information, or tangible things 

6 pursuant to such orders or directives.’’. 

7 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS AMENDMENT.—The table 

8 of contents in the first section of such Act is amended 

9 by adding at the end the following new items: 

‘‘TITLE IX—DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN AGGREGATE INFORMATION 

‘‘Sec. 901. Disclosure of certain aggregate information.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 22-330C

(Filed: August 23, 2022)

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

***************************************

ARTHUR LOPEZ, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

v. *

*

THE UNITED STATES, *

*

Defendant. *

*

***************************************

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Arthur Lopez — proceeding pro se — seeks monetary relief on claims 

arising from loss of his house. See Compl. at 4 (ECF 1). The government has moved 

to dismiss. See Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss (ECF 14); Pl.’s Resp. (ECF 17); Def.’s Reply 

(ECF 20). The motion is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.

Plaintiff alleges that the loss of his house involved a taking of property without 

the just compensation required by the Fifth Amendment. This Court has jurisdiction 

over takings claims. But Plaintiff must plead facts that — if taken as true — would 

plausibly “establish that [a] government action caused the injury.” St. Bernard Par. 

Gov’t v. United States, 887 F.3d 1354, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2018); Adams v. United States, 

391 F.3d 1212, 1218 (Fed. Cir. 2004); see generally Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 

678 (2009). Plaintiff provides no such facts. 

At most, he pleads that a former federal official was on the board of a bank 

that deprived him of his property. Assuming that is true — and making allowances 

for Plaintiff’s pro se status, see Scott v. United States, 134 Fed. Cl. 755, 758 (2017) —

it does not support a reasonable inference that the government itself took any action.

Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678. The United States, moreover, is “the only proper defendant for 

any matter before this [C]ourt,” see Stephenson v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 186, 190 

(2003) (citing United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 588 (1941)), so Plaintiff cannot 

proceed in this case against either the bank or the former federal official. 

In his response to the motion to dismiss, Plaintiff refers to an alleged 

conspiracy between the United States and the bank. Pl.’s Resp. at 5. Even forgiving 
- 2 -

Plaintiff’s failure to present those theories in his Complaint, “the allegations are 

conclusory and not entitled to be assumed true.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 681.

Another problem with the Complaint is that “[a] takings claim must be 

premised on otherwise lawful government action.” Scott, 134 Fed. Cl. at 764. Plaintiff 

argues that his property was taken illegally. Pl.’s Resp. at 5–6. That precludes 

Plaintiff from pursuing a takings theory as well. 

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 

The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Stephen S. Schwartz

STEPHEN S. SCHWARTZ

Judge