alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Lingo Media Corporation (the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: May 1, 2013


/s/ Khurram QureshiKhurram Qureshi

Chief Financial Officer





This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smurfit-Stone ContainerEnterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Patrick J. Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 
|   /s/ Patrick J. Moore                  |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   Patrick J. Moore                      |
|   President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   August 8, 2005                   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided toSmurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained bySmurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# t oXcel LLC

Toxicology & Regulatory Affairs 7140 Heritage Village Plaza

P.O. Box 363 Gainesville, VA 20156 Phone: (703) 754-0248 Fax: (703) 310-6950



### VIA E-MAIL and HAND-DELIVER HARDCOPY

July 23, 2010

Ms. Cynthia Giles-Parker FB/RD (7505P) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

One Potomac Yard 2777 S. Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202

RE: Furfural Technical (Reg. No. 75753-2) ;

MULTIGUARD PROTECT ® EC (Reg. No. 75753-1)

Dear Cynthia:

On behalf of the registrant, Agriguard Company, LLC (“Agriguard”), we would like to thank you and your colleagues within RD for thoroughly consid ering Agriguard’s comments in response to the issues raised in the RD Proposed Decision and t he Agency’s supporting science documents that were in the Furfural Registration Actions dock et (EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0722). While some of these issues raised by our comments appear to have been resolved through revisions of the draft label for Multiguard Protect ® EC, we appreciate the fact that further review by science staff within HED and EFED may be required to address some remaining issues including risk characterization, conditional data requirements, th e methyl bromide alternative status of Furfural, and clarity on golf course tee and green acreage size. Following discussions with RD, Agriguard believes that these and other issues can be satisfactorily resolved through further discussions and/or PRIA actions following registrat ion.

Accordingly, we request that any remaining comments set forth by the registrant during the Public Comment period ending June 21, 2010 be reser ved for consideration by the Agency following the proposed registration for use on golf course turf (tees and greens) and sod farms.

Sincerely,

Alan C. Katz Authorized Representative for Agriguard Company, LL C

cc: M. Waller (PM-21; 7505P) T. Gibson (7505P) J. Herndon (7505P) J. Myers (Agriguard) G.Burger (Agriguard) J. Hensley (Agriguard) P. Quinn (The Accord Group)
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50689

USDC No. A-93-CV-310

 

STEPHEN C. KUHNS, Individually and as next

friend of Jesse Kuhns, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

STEPHEN C. KUHNS, Individually and as next

friend of Jesse Kuhns, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEAM BANK, doing business as Bank One,

Defendant-Appellee,

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,

as Receiver for Bank of the Hills Austin,

 Intervenor-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - -

February 4, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that Stephen C. Kuhns’s motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is DENIED, because his appeal
No. 96-50689

-2-

lacks arguable merit and is therefore frivolous. See Howard v.

King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal

is frivolous, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The district court did not abuse its

discretion by denying Kuhns’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, and

he failed to file a notice of appeal relative to the district

court’s sanction order. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Kuhns’s motions for appointment

of counsel and preparation of the trial transcript at government

expense are DENIED.

We caution Kuhns that any additional frivolous appeals filed

by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions Kuhns is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                         364,550
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24,356,664
<ALLOWANCES>                                   559,862
<INVENTORY>                                    17,377,555
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               45,526,650
<PP&E>                                         3,847,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,962,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 54,450,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          27,290,111
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       335,741
<OTHER-SE>                                     22,264,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   54,450,025
<SALES>                                        48,676,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               48,676,720
<CGS>                                          41,438,836
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  48,865,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             497,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (686,362)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (268,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (418,362)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (418,362)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
Pursuant to the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing in 

Civil and Criminal Cases, the following pleading has been filed. However, it is 

deficient in the area(s) checked below. Please correct the deficiency(ies), as 

noted below, and re-file document IMMEDIATELY. When re-filing document, 

other than a motion, please ensure you add ‘corrected’ to the docket text. If 

the document you are re-filing is a motion, select ‘corrected’ from the dropdown list. 

If an erroneous filing results in failure to meet a deadline, you will need 

to seek relief, for any default, from the presiding judge. 

(1) Other

 Remarks: Pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Proceedings Dated 10/8/2021. This Extension must be done

in the form a Motion and Not a Notice. The Motion should include a Proposed Scheduling Order. The proposed

Order shall omit the word “Proposed” from the title.

United States District Court

Western District of Texas

Waco

Deficiency Notice

To:

From:

Date:

Re:

Siegmund, Mark D.

Court Operations Department, Western District of Texas

Monday, December 20, 2021

06:20-CV-00488-ADA / Doc # 132 / Filed On: 12/17/2021 06:00 PM CST

Case 6:20-cv-00488-ADA Document 133 Filed 12/17/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Newcastle Investment Corp. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Brian C. Sigman, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Brian C. Sigman    
|Brian C. Sigman        
|Chief Financial Officer

February 19, 2010

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

End of Filing
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 3, 2013

t0826 

# Order

Clerk September 3, 2013

146992

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146992

COA: 309492

Eaton CC: 10

- 020234

- FH

CHARLES PATRICK CRATTY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EG01-1-000]

Take notice that on October 4, 2000, Quinnipiac Energy, LLC (Quinnipiac), with its address at 800 Village Walk #324, Guilford, CT 06437, filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) an application for determination of exempt wholesale generator status pursuant to part 365 of the Commission's regulations. 

Quinnipiac is a Delaware limited liability company that will be engaged directly and exclusively in the business of owning or operating, or both owning and operating, all or part of one or more eligible facilities to be located in New Haven, Connecticut. The eligible facilities will consist of an approximately 75 MW oil-fired electric generation project and related interconnection facilities. The output of the eligible facilities will be sold at wholesale.

Any person desiring to be heard concerning the application for exempt wholesale generator status should file a motion to intervene or comments with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). The Commission will limit its consideration of comments to those that concern the adequacy or accuracy of the application. All such motions and comments should be filed on or before October 31, 2000, and must be served on the applicant. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection or on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (please call (202) 208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers

Secretary

[FR Doc. 00-26557  Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                                                              EXHIBIT 27
                          STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIER
                          FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Strawbridge & Clothier's condensed consolidated financial statement of net
assets in liquidation at May 3, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statement.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                           9,222
<SECURITIES>                                   208,936
<RECEIVABLES>                                      308
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,708
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,750
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     184,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,832
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (0)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (0)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (0)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (0)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1609

PAUL E. CHILDRESS,

Petitioner,

versus

BEATRICE POCAHONTAS COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR,

OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(94-2267-BLA)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul E. Childress, Petitioner Pro Se. Douglas Allan Smoot, JACKSON

& KELLY, Charleston, West Virginia; C. William Mangum, Patricia May

Nece, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision

and order and order on reconsideration affirming the administrative

law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A.

§§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence

and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Childress v. Beatrice Pocahontas Coal Co., No.

94-2267-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Marianne Molleur, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StockerYale, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer
and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in
this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007
|                       
|/s/ Marianne Molleur   
|Marianne Molleur       
|Chief Financial Officer