alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark W. Blodgett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of StockerYale, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report.

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark W. Blodgett                 
|Mark W. Blodgett                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Willard DAMRON, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Sept. 26, 1952.

V. R. Bentley, Pikevilley for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal 'from the Pike Circuit Court by Willard Damron from a judgment convicting him of possessing whiskey for sale in local option territory, and fixing his fine at $100 and thirty days in jail. We have considered the record and feel that the judgment should be and it is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
6/15/11 page of

POSTFOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Updated based on Initial Review Engineering Report, Post-Focus Draft Revision 1, 

6/15/2011 

Chemical ID: P-11-0280 Reviewer: Delpire 

 

 

Results Table: Dose, Concentration, and Days Exceeded Results Summary

Exposure Scenario1 Water Landfill Stack Air Fugitive Air

Drinking Water Fish Ingestion

ADR LADD ADR LADD 7Q104

CC = 50

PDM 

Days 

Exceede

d 

LADD ADR LADD ADR LADD

Release 

activity(ies)2; 

exposure 

calculation(s)3 

mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day μg/l # Days mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/d

ay

mg/kg/day

USE: max LADD

1 Exposure scenario titles consist of release activity followed by exposure calculation abbreviation.

2 Release activities are from engineering report's Manufacturing (Mfg), Processing (Proc) and Use release 

activity labels.Multiple release activities are combined in one exposure scenario if their releases occur at 

same location.

3 Exposure calculations are Acute Dose Rate (ADR), Lifetime Average Daily Dose (LADD), and 

Probabilistic Dilution Model (PDM). There may be one, two, or all three exposure calculations per exposure 

scenario.CC is the aquatic concentration of concern.

4 This column displays concentration values for the 7Q10 streamflow, which is defined as the average daily 

streamflow of the seven consecutive days of lowest flow within a ten year period.

Fate Test Recommendation 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 4
6/15/11 page of

POSTFOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-0280 Assessor: Delpire

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#:3 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: USE: Max LADD

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL

Non-sludge/Sludge 

STACK FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge

Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release:

(kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day)

Remarks: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 4
6/15/11 page of

POSTFOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-0280

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 4
6/15/11 page of

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 4
Exhibit C

Case 6:20-cv-00544-ADA Document 31-3 Filed 10/30/20 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., 

LTD. and HUAWEI 

TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00533-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00534-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00535-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00536-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00537-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00538-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00539-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00540-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00541-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00542-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00543-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00544-ADA

[DRAFT] DISCOVERY ORDER

Following the Markman hearings, and pursuant to the Court’s Order Governing Proceedings,

the following discovery limits will apply to the twelve cases referenced above:

 Interrogatories: 8 common interrogatories per side (which can be used across all of the

twelve cases above) and 12 case-specific interrogatories (which can be used only for that

specific case);

 Requests for Admission: 10 common RFAs (which can be used across all of the twelve

cases above) and 20 case-specific RFAs (which can be used only for that specific case);

 Requests for Production: 10 common RFPs (which can be used across all of the twelve

cases above) and 35 case-specific RFPs (which can be used only for that specific case);

 Fact (Party) Depositions: 10 common hours per side (which can be used across all of the

twelve cases above) and 21 case-specific hours (which can be used only for that specific

case);

 Fact (Third-Party) Depositions: 21 case-specific hours (which can be used only for that

specific case);

Page | 1

Case 6:20-cv-00544-ADA Document 31-3 Filed 10/30/20 Page 2 of 3
Page | 2

 Expert Depositions: 7 hours per expert/per report (unless the expert is opining in 

numerous cases, in which case expert depositions are limited to 7 hours per expert/per 

report for the first case, and 4 additional hours for each additional case in which the expert 

provides a report). 

Case 6:20-cv-00544-ADA Document 31-3 Filed 10/30/20 Page 3 of 3
Page | 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,

LTD. and HUAWEI 

TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00533-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00534-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00535-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00536-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00537-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00538-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00539-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00540-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00541-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00542-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00543-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00544-ADA

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE REGARDING 

EXCHANGE OF PROPOSED CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s Version 3.2 of the Court’s Order Governing proceedings entered 

November 9, 2020, and in accordance with the Court’s Scheduling Order, Plaintiff hereby notifies 

the Court Plaintiff has served its proposed claim constructions on Defendants Huawei 

Technologies Co., LTD and Huawei Technologies USA Inc. via electronic mail on January 8, 

2021.

Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 39 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 2
Page | 2

DATED: January 8, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Mark D. Siegmund_____ 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered 

electronically via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, 

on this the 8th day of January 2021.

/s/ Mark D. Siegmund

Mark D. Siegmund

Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 39 Filed 01/08/21 Page 2 of 2
#### 52-54 East End Associates, Respondent, v Herbert Weinstein Associates Incorporated et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered March 19, 1990, which modified a prior order of same court entered January 22, 1990, reducing the amount of an undertaking from $500,000 to $250,000, as a condition for vacatur of default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The appeal from an order of the same court entered January 22, 1990, which, *inter alia,*granted defendants’ motion to vacate the default on condition that defendants post an undertaking in the amount of $500,000, is dismissed as superceded.

Plaintiff retained defendants to act as the construction manager on a 40-story residential building. After several delays and cost overruns, plaintiff terminated defendants’ services and commenced an action seeking recovery of $396,470 arising out of defendants’ alleged conversion and misap*235propriation of construction funds. After defendants’ default, and plaintiff’s application for entry of a default judgment in the sum of $459,579, for which an inquest was scheduled, defendants moved to vacate the default. The motion was granted on condition that defendants post an undertaking in the sum of $500,000, which the court reduced, on a subsequent motion, to $250,000. Under the facts presented, the imposition of a bond did not constitute an abuse of discretion. Although defendants argue that that modified undertaking serves to deprive them of their day in court because their financial status prevents them from obtaining the bond, no documentary proof was submitted in support of this claim. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 200 (Monday, October 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26532]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1343-DR]


Ohio; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Ohio, (FEMA-1343-DR), dated September 26, 2000, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Ohio is hereby amended to include Public Assistance for the 
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President 
in his declaration of September 26, 2000:

    Greene County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-26532 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7543

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN MARQUIS JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(4:08-cr-01258-RBH-5)

Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: February 5, 2014

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Marquis Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker 

Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Marquis Johnson appeals the district court’s text 

order denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence. 

Johnson argues that he should be resentenced in light of this 

Court’s decision in United States v. Simmons, 649 F.3d 237 (4th 

Cir. 2011) (en banc). However, Johnson’s claim is not 

cognizable under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). Accordingly, we 

affirm the district court’s order denying relief. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Allan Block, hereby certify that the annual
report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



| |                         
| | ------------------------
| | /s/ ALLAN BLOCK         
| |                         
| | Name: Allan Block       
| | Title: Managing Director

Dated: March 23, 2004
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elizabeth Arden, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 26, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E.
Scott Beattie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Stephen J. Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our
knowledge:

     (i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  September 8, 2003              /s/ E. Scott Beattie
       -----------------              --------------------
                                      E. Scott Beattie
                                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



                                      /s/ Stephen J. Smith
                                      --------------------
                                      Stephen J. Smith
                                      Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Elizabeth Arden, Inc. and will be retained by Elizabeth Arden,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 10.9

LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD.

c/o Laurus Capital Management, LLC

335 Madison Avenue

New York, New
York 10017

July 31, 2007

StockerYale, Inc.

32 Hampshire Road

Salem, New Hampshire 03079

Attention: Chief Financial Officer

Re: Registration
Rights Agreement Amendment

Gentlemen:

Reference is made to (a) the Registration Rights Agreement (Agreement) dated June 19, 2007 between StockerYale, Inc. (the Company) and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (Laurus);
Capitalized terms used herein that are not defined shall have the meaning given to them in the Agreement.

The Company has requested that
Laurus amend the Agreement and Laurus is willing to do so on the terms and conditions set forth below.

In consideration of the agreements
set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree that:

1. the definition of Effectiveness Date appearing in Section 1 of the Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

Effectiveness Date means the 60thday following the Filing Date.

Except as specifically
amended herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and is hereby ratified and confirmed. The execution, delivery and effectiveness of this letter agreement shall not operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of Laurus, nor
constitute a waiver of any provision of the Agreement.

This letter agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties
hereto and their respective administrators, successors and assigns and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

[Remainder of the page intentionally blank.]



---

This letter agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in one or more counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Any signature delivered by a party by facsimile transmission shall be deemed to be an original signature hereto.



Very truly yours,LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD.By:

/s/ David GrinIts:

Director


CONSENTED AND AGREED TO:



|                  |  |                     
|----------------- |  | --------------------
|STOCKERYALE, INC.
|                  | 
|By:               |  | /s/ Mark W. Blodgett
|                  |  | Mark W. Blodgett    
|                  |  | President           



|                         |  |                       
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------
|STOCKERYALE CANADA, INC.
|                         | 
|By:                      |  | /s/ Mark W. Blodgett  
|                         |  | Name: Mark W. Blodgett
|                         |  | Title: President      



|                       |  |                     
|---------------------- |  | --------------------
|LASIRIS HOLDINGS, INC.
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ Mark W. Blodgett
|Name:                  |  | Mark W. Blodgett    
|Title:                 |  | President
Exhibit13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Randgold Resources Limited(the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the yearended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, D. Mark Bristow, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                  |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ D. Mark Bristow D.Mark Bristow Chief Executive Officer October 26,2005

----
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Storage Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Patrick J. Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ PATRICK J. MARTIN 
Patrick J. MartinChief Executive Officer May 5, 2004
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 1 of 20
 

 

Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 2 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 3 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 4 of 20
 

Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 5 of 20
 

 

Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 6 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 7 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 8 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 9 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 10 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 11 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 12 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 13 of 20
 

Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 14 of 20
 

Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 15 of 20
 

Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 16 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 17 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 18 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 19 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-00170-DB-ATB Document 119 Filed 10/03/22 Page 20 of 20