alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.17


 


Explanatory
Note: This document has been translated from the Chinese-language original for reference purposes only. While this English translation
is believed to be generally accurate, it is subject to, and qualified by, in its entirety, the Chinese-language original. Such Chinese-language
original shall be the controlling document for all purposes.


 


Purchase
Advance Payment Contract


 


Party
A (payer): Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party
B (Payee): Yuyun Wang


 


Party
B is Party A’s raw material supplier. In order to reduce operating costs and enhance the partnership between the two parties, Party
A agrees to prepay certain prices for the purchase of corresponding raw materials for Party B’s obligation to provide Party A with
Camellia seeds. After full negotiation by both parties, the following contracts have been concluded:


 


1.
Purpose of advance payment: Party B can only use the advance payment paid by Party A to purchase camellia seed raw materials, and shall
not use it for other purposes.


 


2.
Prepaid amount: RMB 8,000,000


 


3.
As Party B’s business scope also involves Camellia seed oil, Party A may also provide Party B with Camellia seed oil of the same
value as the advance payment to offset the advance payment. The price of Camellia seed oil shall be in accordance with Party A’s
regulations.


 


4.
Repayment method: Party B will deduct the advance payment in the form of Camellia seeds or equivalent currency to Party A. The repayment
period shall not exceed twelve months per year, and special circumstances shall be negotiated separately.


 


5.
Party B promises to provide Party A with Camellia Seeds at a price that is 2% lower than the actual price of Camellia Seeds on the actual
delivery date. After the prepayment is deducted, the settlement will be based on the actual market price.


 


6.
If Party B fails to use the advance payment as required by the agreement, Party A has the right to recover the advance payment and impose
a penalty interest of three thousandths per day for the breached part.


 


7.
For matters not covered, the two parties can negotiate and conclude a supplementary contract. The supplementary contract has the same
legal effect as this contract. Any party who fails to negotiate can bring a lawsuit to the people’s court in China.


 


8.
This contract is valid for one year, and it will automatically terminate when it expires.


 


9.
This contract has two copies, with each party holding one copy, and it will take effect from the date of signing.


 


/s/
Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party
A: Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Date:
May 20, 2020


 


/s/
Yuyun Wang


Party
B: Yuyun Wang


Date:
May 20, 2020
Exhibit
23




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-110552 and 333-131455) and S-8 (Nos. 333-114897, 333-118771
and 333-160867) of Access National Corporation of our reports dated March 29,
2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which appear in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP





BDO
Seidman, LLP


Richmond,
Virginia


March 29,
2010
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                                                                    PO BOX 84013
                                                          Columbus GA 31908-4013
                                                               Tel. 800.784.5566

                                                      [GREENPOINT MORTGAGE LOGO]

TO : RWT HOLDINGS, INC.

      Re: Annual Statement as to Compliance by the Seller

      Pursuant to Section 6.04 of the Mortgage Loan Flow Purchase, Sale, and
Servicing Agreement between GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. as Seller (the
"Seller") and RWT Holdings, Inc. as Purchaser, dated as of August 1, 2002 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned officer of the Seller, hereby certifies as to the
following:

            (i) a review of the activities of the Seller during the calendar
      year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Applicable Period") and of the Seller's
      performance under the Agreement has been made under the direct supervision
      of the undersigned officer; and

            (ii) to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such
      review, the Seller has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      Agreement throughout the Applicable Period, and there has been no known
      default in the fulfillment of the Seller's obligations throughout such
      Applicable Period.

                                                   Very Truly Yours

                                                   GREENPOINT MORTGAGE
                                                   FUNDING, INC.
                                                   as Seller

                                                   /s/ Roy Briggs
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Name: Roy Briggs
                                                   Title: Vice President

                AVISO IMPORTANTE PARA LAS PERSONAS HABLA ERPANOL
      Siusted no entiendo el contenido de esta carta por favor obtonga una
                             traduccion immediamente

                  2300 BROOKSTONE CENTRE PKWY COLUMBUS GA 31904
       CUSTOMER SERVICE HOURS: MONDAY - FRIDAY, 8:30 AM - 8:00 PM, EASTERN
                            WWW.GREENPOINTSERVICE.COM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          44,984
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             515
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    151,133
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         302,044
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           293,576
<LOANS>                                        670,953
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,207,636
<DEPOSITS>                                     788,331
<SHORT-TERM>                                   239,841
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             60,398
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,414
<COMMON>                                         8,734
<OTHER-SE>                                      97,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,207,636
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 31,801
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               15,200
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   238
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                47,239
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,448
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,667
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           30,572
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,040
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 24,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,333
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,456
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,877
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .91
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.93
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,510
<LOANS-PAST>                                       553
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    302
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,117
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,427
<RECOVERIES>                                       194
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,924
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,709
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            215


</TABLE>
Order filed May 9, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00519-CV

____________

STATE FARM COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS AND 

STATE FARM LLOYDS, Appellants

V.

ROYA BADAVI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-28043

ORDER

On May 1, 2013, the parties notified this court that the parties had reached 

an agreement to settle the issues on appeal, and requested that the appeal be abated 

for completion of the settlement. The motion is granted. Accordingly, we issue 

the following order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket until June 10, 2013. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s 
active docket at that time, or when the parties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or 

other dispositive motion. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to 

reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its 

own motion.

PER CURIAM
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5661 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1-Hydroxy cyclohexyl phenyl 

ketone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1-Hydroxy 

cyclohexyl phenyl ketone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1-HYDROXY CYCLOHEXYL PHENYL KETONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1-Hydroxy cyclohexyl 

phenyl ketone (CAS No. 

947–19–3) (provided for in 

subheading 2914.40.40) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5661 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                             5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1000
       
<S>                                                 <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           90,625
<SECURITIES>                                     34,829
<RECEIVABLES>                                   244,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3,271
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                514,780
<PP&E>                                          289,019
<DEPRECIATION>                                  159,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  824,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           405,255
<BONDS>                                          23,464
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         17,731
<OTHER-SE>                                      309,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    824,448
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                635,783
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   579,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 34,719
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  22,855<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                      7,805
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              15,050
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     15,050
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.17
<FN>
<F1>Includes General and Administrative Expenses of $34,719 and interest income
of $1,877 not reflected on this tag list.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### HOWELL v. STATE.

No. 22665.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 15, 1943.

Nolen L. Sewell, of Decatur, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Upon his pica of guilty to the offense-of possessing whisky for the purpose of sale, appellant was, by a jury, convicted,, and his punishment was assessed at nine months in the county jail.

Appellant, testifying as a witness in his-own behalf, appealed to the jury for a light punishment, asserting that, ií the jury would grant his request, he would not again, be guilty of violating the law; that, had he-known that his case would be called for trial at the time it was called, he could' and would have had witnesses present who-could and would have attested his good reputation and character; that he had only a few hours’ notice that his case would be called for trial.

All this testimony on the part of the appellant was admitted without objection by the State. However, to rebut appellant’s-testimony, and especially that part relative-to previous notice of the day of trial, the county judge before whom the case was-being tried testified, “that he had just talked' to Brink Poore of Bridgeport, Texas over the telephone long distance and that Brink Poore told him in such conversation that he had informed the defendant that his case was set for trial a week before the date-same was tried, and that what the defendant said about not being informed it was-set was not true.”

Appellant objected to this testimony-for the reason, among others, that same-was hearsay. That the testimony was hearsay is not debatable.

*187We note also that the bill of exception presenting this matter certifies that the county judge, in giving this testimony, was not sworn as a witness. A judge presiding at a trial may testify as a witness in the case; but, to be eligible to do so, he must be sworn as any other witness. Valentine v. State, 6 Tex.App. 439; 44 Tex. Jur. 1077.

For the errors pointed out, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the report of Worldwide Biotech & Pharmaceutical Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wenxia Guo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Wenxia Guo


Wenxia Guo


Chief Executive Officer


November 15, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunair Services Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on August 14, 2006 (the “Report”), I, John J. Hayes, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.         /s/ John J. Hayes   John J. Hayes   President and Chief Executive Officer   August 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for period
ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, George Drazenovic, the Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 14, 2006

By: /s/ George
Drazenovic

George Drazenovic, Chief Financial
Officer(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Parsons Corporation ) ASBCA No. 59500 ) Under Contract No. DAAA09-99-C-OO 16 

### et al. ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: Kevin J. Slattum, Esq. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Los Angeles, CA APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Carol L. Matsunaga, Esq.

Senior Trial Attorney Srikanti Schaffner, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Carson, CA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 20 June 2017

Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59500, Appeal ofParsons Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Docket Management System 1200

New Jersey Ave., SE Washington DC 20590 Re: Amendment of Earl Dunbar Harrisons Exemption No. 12501 Dear Sir or Ma’am, Earl Dunbar Harrison respectfully requests amendmen t to FAA Exemption # 12501 Thank you for the approval of the exemption. There was a mistake on the exemption and a small bit of misunderstanding on our behalf. We would like the operator to be peak Perspective LLC. As for the operations un der the amendment currently everything would remain the same and it would be no threat to the public safety to change the operator’s name to Peak Perspective LLC. Furthermore we request for the additional UAS listed below to be added to our exemption fo r continued safe operation:

• Altavian F6500 • Altavian R8400 • sense fly eXom • Aibotix X6 • Turbo ace Matrix quad rotor • 3d robotics solo quad • 3d robotics X - 8m • 3d robotics aero 8m • H20 Quad • X-fold mapper x8 • Vulcan x8 The drones proposed on this amendment meet the FAA regulations for small unmanned aircraft. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Should you have any questions, please contact us. Respectfully, Earl Dunbar Harrison Peak Perspective LLC 1833 18 th St Santa Monica, CA (503) -410 -4638
HOLE_DIRECTION_TYPE HOLE_DIRECTION

D DIRECTIONAL

H HORIZONTAL

P PINNATE

V VERTICAL
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Andre, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Dwyer, J.), rendered May 18, 1989, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*344Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A person may commit a larceny when he steals property "with intent to deprive another of [the] property” (Penal Law § 155.05 [1]). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we conclude, contrary to the defendant’s assertions, that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish that the defendant intended permanently to deprive another of his property *(see, People v Welsh,*124 AD2d 301, 303; *see also, People v Kirnon,*39 AD2d 666, *affd*31 NY2d 877; *People v Reed,*124 AD2d 836). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find that they are unpreserved for appellate review. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Steak n Shake Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Sardar Biglari


Sardar Biglari, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President


August 10, 2009




/s/ Duane E. Geiger


Duane E. Geiger, Interim Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Controller


August 10, 2009