alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Alex Werber, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Oramed
      Pharmaceuticals Inc. for the annual period ended August 31, 2007 (the
      "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc.                                                                        

Dated: December 12, 2007





*/s/ Alex Werber*
  Alex Werber 
  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 
  (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Oramed
Pharmaceuticals Inc. and will be retained by Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES L. MACKLIN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

MATTHEW HOLLINGSWORTH, Select

Portfolio Servicing, Inc.; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 15

- 16034

D.C. No. 2:10

- cv

- 01097

- MCE

- KJN

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 26, 2017 **

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges

.

James L. Macklin appeals from the district court’s order den ying his motion

for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo a district court’s order denying a motion to vacate a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provi ded by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Macklin’s request for oral

argument

, set forth in his opening brief

, is denied. 

# FILED

OCT 4 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 16034

judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4). Exp. Group v. Reef Indus., Inc. , 54 F.3d

1466, 1469 (9th Cir. 1995) . We affirm.

The district court properly denied Macklin’s motion to vacate its order under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (4) because Macklin fail ed to demonstrate that the district

court “lacked jurisdiction, either as to the subject matter of the dispute or over the

parties to be bound, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process of law.”

United States v. Berke , 170 F.3d 882, 883 (9th Cir. 1999).

To the extent Macklin seeks relief from the bankruptcy court’s judgment in a

separate proceeding

, such relief is outside the scope of this appeal. Moreover, t he

bankruptcy court entered an order den ying Macklin’s request for relief under Fed.

R. Civ. P. 60(b) and Macklin unsuccessfully appealed th at order

. See Macklin v.

Deutsche Bank Nat ’l Trust Co.

, No. 16

- 15366 (9th Cir. Dec. 14, 201 6)

.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL 

INC., EMC CORPORATION, AND 

VMWARE, INC., 

Defendant.

Case No.: 6:20-cv-00485-ADA 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

DECLARATION OF JOSHUA A. WHITEHILL IN SUPPORT OF 

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO AMEND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS 

I, Joshua A. Whitehill, declare as follows: 

1. I am Special Counsel with the law firm of Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP. I am one 

of the attorneys responsible for the representation of Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a 

Brazos Licensing and Development in the above-captioned litigation, and make this Declaration 

in support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity 

Contentions. 

2. If called to testify under oath in court, I could and would testify competently to the 

facts stated herein. 

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of a document produced by 

Defendants bearing production numbers VMW_DELL-WSOU-PA-000653-657. 

Case 6:20-cv-00485-ADA Document 173-1 Filed 03/30/22 Page 1 of 2
4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of a document produced by 

Defendants bearing production numbers VMW_DELL-WSOU-PA-002230-2234. 

5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of a document produced by 

Defendants bearing production numbers VMW_DELL-WSOU-PA-002235-2242. 

6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the 

Declaration of Mary K. Bolin, Ph.D. in Support of Request for Ex Parte Reexamination, along 

with Exhibits 2-A, 3-A, and 5-A thereto, all of which were extracted from the image file wrapper 

for Control No. 90/019,048 (a reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,636,309), as maintained and 

downloaded from the USPTO's Public Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. 

PAIR indicates that these documents were filed with the USPTO on December 17, 2021. 

I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America 

that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, formed 

after reasonable inquiry under the circumstances. 

Executed on the 30th day of March, 2022, in Bloomfield, New Jersey. 

Joshua A. Whitehill 

Case 6:20-cv-00485-ADA Document 173-1 Filed 03/30/22 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60978-60979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26430]



[[Page 60979]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Public Meeting; Federal Committee on Registered Apprenticeship

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. APP.1), notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the Federal Committee on Registered Apprenticeship (FCRA).
    Time and Date: The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. Thursday, 
October 26, 2000, and will continue until approximately 5:00 p.m. The 
meeting will reconvene at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, October 27, 2000, and 
will continue until approximately 12 noon.
    Place: The Capital Hilton, 1001-16th Street NW, Washington, D.C. 
(202) 393-1000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Anthony Swoope, Administrator, 
Office of Apprenticeship Training, Employer and Labor Services, 
Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room 
N-4649, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210. Telephone: 
(202) 693-2796, (this is not a toll-free number).

Matters To Be Considered

    The agenda will focus on the following topics:
(1) Reports on the FCRA Work Groups:

    Marketing
    Quality
    Diversity
    Resources/Data
    Legislative

(2) School to Work Technical Assistance Providers Bank
(3) Discuss FCRA Recommendations for submission to the Secretary of 
Labor
(4) Progress Report on OATELS/BAT activities
(5) Next Meeting Dates and Location
(6) Public Comment

Status

    Members of the public are invited to attend the proceedings. 
Individuals with disabilities should contact Marion Winters at (202) 
219-5921 no later than October 16, 2000, if special accommodations are 
needed.
    Any member of the public who wishes to file written data or 
comments pertaining to the agenda may do so by sending it to Mr. 
Anthony Swoope, Administrator, Office of Apprenticeship Training, 
Employer and Labor Services, Employment and Training Administration, 
U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-4649, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20210. Such submissions should be sent by October 16, 
2000, to be included in the record for the meeting.
    Any member of the public who wishes to speak at the meeting should 
indicate the nature of the intended presentation and the amount of time 
needed by furnishing a written statement to the Designated Federal 
Official by October 16, 2000. The chairperson will announce at the 
beginning of the meeting the extent to which time will permit the 
granting of such request.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of October 2000.
Raymond L. Bramucci,
Assistant Secretary of Employment and Training.
[FR Doc. 00-26430 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2647 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to provide eligibility for public broadcasting facilities to receive certain disaster assistance, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2013 

Mr. HIGGINS (for himself, Mr. PALAZZO, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. COLE, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. NADLER, Mr. SIRES, and Mr. YOUNG of Alaska) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to provide eligibility for public 

broadcasting facilities to receive certain disaster assistance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Informa5 tion Improvement Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2647 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF PUBLIC BROADCASTING FACILI2 TIES FOR CERTAIN DISASTER ASSISTANCE. 

3 (a) PRIVATE NONPROFIT FACILITY DEFINED.—Sec4 tion 102(11)(B) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

5 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122(10)(B)) 

6 is amended by inserting ‘‘public broadcasting facilities,’’ 

7 after ‘‘workshops,’’. 

8 (b) CRITICAL SERVICES DEFINED.—Section 

9 406(a)(3)(B) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

10 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5172(a)(3)(B)) 

11 is amended by striking ‘‘communications,’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘communications (including broadcast and telecommuni13 cations),’’. 

14 (c) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this 

15 section shall apply to a major disaster declared by the 

16 President under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

17 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) 

18 on or after October 28, 2012. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION





I, Khurram R. Qureshi, Chief Financial Officer of Lingo Media Inc., certify that:



I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Lingo Media Inc.



Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.



Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in the report.



I and the other certifying officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the Company.



I and the other certifying officers have designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information is made known to us, particularly during the period in which the periodic report is being prepared.



I and the other certifying officers have evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report; and



I and the other certifying officers have presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required evaluation as of that date.



I and the other certifying officers have disclosed to the Companys auditors and to the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):



(i)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



(ii)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and



I and the other certifying officers have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Dated:  July 30, 2003







BY: /s/ KHURRAM R. QURESHI

Khurram R. Queshi

Chief Financial Officer
#### PETERSON v. STATE.

No. 23665.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 11, 1947.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 15, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Cr. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., both of Houston, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for aggravated assault upon a plea of guilty, punishment assessed being six months in jail.

No statement of facts or bills of exception appear in the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing in which he raises the question as to the .construction *to be given to*that part of Section 10 of Article I of the Constitution, Vernon’s Ann.St., reading as follows:

> “* * * and no person shall be held to answer for a criminal offense, unless on an indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases in which the punishment is by fine, or imprisonment, otherwise than in the penitentiary, * *

His position is very clearly stated and the contention made is that all complaints must be lodged by indictment by a grand jury except those in which the punishment is *by fine or imprisonment otherwise than in the penitentiary.*By Article 1148 of the Penal Code the punishment may be by fine or imprisonment, or by both such fine and imprisonment. The conclusion is that for aggravated assault the punishment may be both fine and imprisonment. It is the contention that because both may be assessed he can be charged only by indictment of a grand jury.

There have been many attacks made on proceedings because not in compliance with this section of the Constitution, but this, to the writer, is the first one in which we find this particular question raised. Thousands of cases have come to this Court in which convictions were had for aggravated assault and battery. Usually they were charged by complaint and information. All courts have acted upon the assumption this was proper. We think they have been right and are, therefore, unable to give effect to the distinction which appellant seeks to make.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Rick Hubbs, certify that:          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Mountain National Bancshares, Inc.;          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;          4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]          (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and          (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and          5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reportingDate: April 2, 2007                                                         /s/ Richard A. Hubbs   Richard A. Hubbs   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.12

LOGO





CONSENT OF MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.

The
Board of Directors

Paramount Energy Operating Corp., as Administrator of

Paramount Energy Trust

We hereby consent
to the reference to us in the registration statement on Form 40-F of Paramount Energy Trust and to the incorporation by reference therein of our reports dated February 9, 2010.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd.
|                                      
|/s/ P. A. Welch                       
|P. A. Welch, P. Eng.                  
|President & Managing Director         

March 9, 2010

Calgary, Alberta

2200, Bow Valley Square 3, 255 - 5 Avenue SW, Calgary AB   T2P 3G6    Tel: (403) 262-5506    Fax: (403) 233-2744    www.mcdan.com
#### HEMPHILL v. STATE.

No. 25986.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 29, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for possession of whiskey in a dry area for the purpose of sale; ' the punishment, a fine of $1,000.

The record contains no notice of appeal, without which we are without jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              209
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          233
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
                                               


</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00062-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.B., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 325th District 

Court

of Tarrant County (325-621544-17)

June 9, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel