alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral
part of such statements and the condensed consolidated financial information in
this schedule.  Figures below are in thousands, except per-share data.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-01-2000             DEC-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUN-3-2000              DEC-4-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-01-2000             SEP-01-2000
<CASH>                                          42,762                  42,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,633                  86,633
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,055                   4,055
<INVENTORY>                                     78,766                  78,766
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               235,182                 235,182
<PP&E>                                         127,144                 127,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,818                  51,818
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 331,768                 331,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,096                  70,096
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        14,237                  14,237
<OTHER-SE>                                     242,326                 242,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   331,768                 331,768
<SALES>                                        144,760                 452,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,760                 452,956
<CGS>                                           92,700                 288,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,700                 288,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   482                   1,156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 394                   1,548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,630                  41,752
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,848                  15,874
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,782                  25,878
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,782                  25,878
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .18                     .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18                     .59



</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. IGNAC IO LOPEZ SOSA, a .k.a . C arlos Duran, a .k.a . Igna c io Tony Sosa , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-50489

D.C . No. 2:13-c r-00478-R M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia M anue l L. R e a l , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 17, 2015 * * B e fore : O’ SC ANNLAIN, LEAVY, a n d FER N ANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Igna c io Lope z Sosa

a ppe a ls from

the distric t

c ourt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha lle nge s the 36-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for 

# FIL ED FEB 25 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).be ing a

n ille g a l a lie n found in the Unite d State s following de porta tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. W e hav e jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . Lope z Sosa

c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt proc e d

ura lly e rre d by

fa iling to e xpla in these nte nc e a de quate ly . W e re v ie w for pla in e rror, se eUnite d State s v . Vale nc ia-Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th C ir. 2010), a nd find none . The distric t c o urt liste n e d to Lope z Sosa ’ s a rgum e nts, sta

te d tha t it ha d re vie we d the c rite ria se t forth in 18 U.S.C . § 3553(a), and im pose d a se nte nc e be low the Guide line s ra

nge . The fa ilure to do m ore doe s not c onstitute pla in e rror. Se eid. Lope z Sosa

a lso c onte nds tha

t his se nte nc e is substa

ntive ly unre a sona

ble . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in im

posing Lope z Sosa ’ s se nte nc e . Se eGall v . Unite d

State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The be low-Guide l ine s se nte nc e is substa ntive ly re a sona

ble in light of the

se c tion 3553(a

) se nte nc ing fa c tors a

nd the t ota lity of the c irc um sta n c e s, inc luding Lope z Sosa ’ s m ultipleprior re e ntrie s and his c rim i n a l history . Se eGall , 552 U.S. a t 51 . AFFIRM E D.

1

1 3 - 5 0 4 8 9 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darren Dodd, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), both rendered January 23, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 195/88, and robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 295/88, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunair Electronics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2004 (the "Report"), I,
James E. Laurent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ James E. Laurent
-------------------------------------
James E. Laurent
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 17, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended on June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and to which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Robert E. Lowder, the principal executive officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 7, 2003

|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|/s/ Robert E. Lowder                                              
|                                                                  
|Robert E. Lowder Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and will be retained by The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
p. 1 of 2

From: Bilskis, Patricia A. [ mailto:Patricia.Bilskis@alcoa.com ]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 1:31 PM
To: Putney, David; Palazzolo, Michael A. Subject: RE: Emission testing results for the Intalco facil ity

Dear Mr. PutneyThe following sources were tested at Intalco for th e following pollutants.

Source Control Device Pollutant(s) Tested

Potlines Alumina Injection Scrubber (Primary Control

Device) POM, HAP metals, PM

Potlines Wet Scrubber (Secondary Control Device) POM, HAP metals, PM

Green Mill Pitch Fume Treatment System PM Baking Furnace Alumina Injection Scrubber PM

All of the PM and POM source testing results appear normal with the exception of the POM results from the potline wet scrubbers. As you may recall, the potl ine wet scrubbers had previously been tested for PO M in November of 2011 (result 0.86 lb POM/ton Al), and M arch of 2012 (result 0.44 lb POM/ton Al). Results f rom the 2013 testing event showed a potline wet scrubbe r POM emission rate of 9.30 lb POM/ ton Al. Follow ing receipt of the results, Intalco immediately perform ed a root cause analysis. We were unable to identi fy the exact cause for the higher results, but suspect th e bias may be related to laboratory analytical proc edures. To confirm this suspicion, Intalco is planning to perf orm a limited retest on the potline wet scrubbers d uring the week of September 16. The results from this Septem ber testing event will be made available to you as soon as they are received.

Attached please find results, in pdf format, for th e green mill and baking furnace source testing requ ested under the primary aluminum testing ICR. Due to siz e, the potline source test results will be sent if a follow up
email.

Please do not hesitate to send me any questions you may have.

Thanks so much!
Patricia Bilskis Environmental Specialist Intalco Aluminum Corporation Ferndale WA, 98248
Office: 360-384-7267p. 2 of 2

From: Putney, David [ mailto:putney.david@epa.gov ] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 6:35 AM
To: Bilskis, Patricia A.; Palazzolo, Michael A. Subject: EXT: Emission testing results for the Intalco faci lity

Patricia/Mike,

Would you please give me an update on the emissions testing at the Intalco facility? Based on earlier correspondence the expected date of submittal of th e test report was 07/26/13. Has the lab encountered difficulties with the samples?

When should I expect to receive this test report?

Thanks,

David Putney, Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711 Mail Drop D243-02 Ph: (919) 541-2016 Fax: (919) 541-3207
Email: putney.david@epa.gov
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sequa Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin Weinstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Martin Weinstein

Martin Weinstein

Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





Dated:  October 29, 2007
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 570 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to enhance the 

roles of dentists and allied dental personnel in the Nation’s disaster response framework, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 570 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dental Emergency Re3 sponder Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DENTAL EMERGENCY RESPONDERS: PUBLIC 

5 HEALTH AND MEDICAL RESPONSE. 

6 (a) NATIONAL HEALTH SECURITY STRATEGY.—Sec7 tion 2802(b)(3) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 300hh–1(b)(3)) is amended— 

9 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

10 by inserting ‘‘and which may include dental health 

11 facilities’’ after ‘‘mental health facilities’’; and 

12 (2) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ‘‘(which 

13 may include such dental health assets)’’ after ‘‘med14 ical assets’’. 

15 (b) ALL-HAZARDS PUBLIC HEALTH AND MEDICAL

16 RESPONSE CURRICULA AND TRAINING.—Section 

17 319F(a)(5)(B) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

18 U.S.C. 247d–6(a)(5)(B)) is amended by striking ‘‘public 

19 health or medical’’ and inserting ‘‘public health, medical, 

20 or dental’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 8, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 570 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to enhance 

for other purposes. in the Nation’s disaster response framework, and the roles of dentists and allied dental personnel
EXHIBIT 15.7

Onno ten Brinke

La Chesnaie de Bas,

Mont de la Chesnaie

St. Lawrence

Jersey

The Board of Directors of

Randgold Resources Limited (the Company)

March 30, 2012



|Re: | Consent
|--- | -------

Gentlemen:

I, Onno ten Brinke, do hereby consent to the reference of myself in the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2011 (the Annual Report) to which this consent is an exhibit, to any reference to Mr. Onno ten Brinke under the heading Experts in any registration statement into which the Annual Report is incorporated by
reference, and to the citation and/or summarization of the reserve statement in the Annual Report as estimated by me for the Massawa open pit mineral reserves.

Dated this
30thday of March, 2012.



|                      |  |                    
|--------------------- |  | -------------------
|By:                   |  | /s/ Onno ten Brinke
|Name: Onno ten Brinke
|Title: Consultant
#### GREEN v. STATE.

No. 22262.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 4, 1942.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 1943.

Mel Janes, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area, and fined the sum of $100.

There are neither bills of exceptions nor statement of facts in the record. The proceedings appear tO' be in regular form, and we find nothing presented to us for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

At the time the judgment of affirmance was entered on November 4, 1942, there were neither bills of exception nor statement of facts in the record.

Appellant files a motion for rehearing and in connection therewith asks that a writ of certiorari issue directing the clerk of the trial court to send up the bills of exception and statement of facts. The bills of exception are before us in a supplemental transcript. An affidavit by R. W. (Dick) Webb states in positive terms that he filed with the clerk the bills of exception and statement of facts in this case on January 27, 1942, at the same time he filed the bills of exception and statement of facts in cause No. 22261 on our docket. 167 S.W.2d 180. The clerk makes affidavit that there is no statement of facts in the present cause on file in his office, and that “to the best of his knowledge and belief no statement of facts in said cause was ever filed” in his office. If the statement of facts was before us it would be considered notwithstanding the delayed filing in the trial court for the same reason that we considered the statement of facts in cause No. 22,261, against the same appellant. It *183appears from the motion for rehearing- that appellant relies on the claim that such statement of facts was filed in the court below, and presumably bases his request for a reversal upon the absence of the statement of facts from the record before this court. This would be no ground for a reversal. See Good v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 67 S.W. 102. The statement of facts could be substituted under our statute (Art. 828, C.C.P.), but no steps have been taken to- so substitute it, or if so, we have not been apprised of it.

The bills of exception have been examined. The only ones appearing to present a claim to consideration depend upon the facts proven upon the trial. These are not set out in the bills, and the facts are not otherwise presented.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
MEMORANDUM TO DOCKET

Docket No.: EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0588 

Date: January 27, 2014

Subject: Summary of Communications and Consultation between EPA, Phoenix Cement Company 

(PCC), and Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC) Regarding Potential Reasonable 

Progress (RP) Controls for Phoenix Cement Clarkdale Plant 

Date Description

2012-11-06 Email from Colleen McKaughan, EPA, to Verle Martz, PCC, providing contractor report 

(initial draft RP analysis) and seeking additional information

2012-11-28 Email from Verle Martz, PCC, to Colleen McKaughan, EPA, seeking clarification on 

EPA 2012-11-06 email 

2012-12-14 Email from McKaughan, EPA, to Martz, PCC, responding to 2012-11-28 email

2012-12-20 Letter from Diane Enos, SRPMIC to Jared Blumenfeld, EPA, regarding potential impacts 

of EPA’s proposed partial disapproval of Arizona SIP on SRPMIC

2013-01-29 Email from Colleen McKaughan to Gary Bohnee, SRPMIC, and Martz, PCC, et al. 

regarding extension of Public Comment Period

2013-02-04 Email from McKaughan to Bohnee, Martz, et al. regarding extension of public comment 

period and request for information.

2012-02-11 Email from McKaughan to Bohnee, Martz, et al. regarding consultation

2013-02-26 Email from McKaughan to Bohnee and Martz regarding extension of public comment 

period and request for information.

2013-02-28 Letter from Blumenfeld to Enos regarding EPA’s proposed partial disapproval of 

Arizona SIP and consultation

2013-03-06 Letter from Martz to Greg Nudd, EPA, commenting on EPA’s proposed partial approval 

and partial disapproval of Arizona SIP 

2013-06-19 Letter from Martz to Nudd commenting on EPA’s supplemental proposal 

2013-09-25 Letter from Blumenfeld to Enos regarding consultation

2013-10-18 Letter from Enos to Blumenfeld regarding consultation

2013-11-06 In-person consultation between Enos, Blumenfeld, et al 

2013-11-14 Phone call between SRPMIC, PCC and EPA staff

2013-11-25 Email from Charlotte Withey, EPA, to Jennifer Giff, SRPMIC, et al. regarding draft 

regulatory text 

2013-12-10 Email from Withey to Giff, et al. regarding draft regulatory text

2013-12-11 Email from George A. Tsiolis, Counsel to SRPMIC-PCC to Withey, et al. regarding draft 

regulatory text and cost analysis

2013-12-11 Email from Withey to Tsiolis, et al. regarding cost analysis

2013-12-17 Phone call between Brett Lindsay, PCC, and Eugene Chen regarding cost analysis

2013-12-20 Email from Tsiolis to Withey, et al. regarding RP analysis

2013-12-21 Email from Withey to Tsilois, et al. regarding RP analysis

2014-01-09 Email from Withey to Tsilois, et al. regarding RP analysis

2014-01-10 Email from Tsilois to Withey, et al. regarding RP analysis
Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATION OF
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Lingo Media Corporation (the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Date: March 13, 2012
 
 /s/ Michael KraftMichael Kraft

President & Chief Executive Officer
 
 This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rotech Healthcare
Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Philip L. Carter, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Steven P. Alsene, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of each such officers
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|       |  | /S/    PHILIP L. CARTER              
|Name:  |  | Philip L. Carter                     
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | March 6, 2009                        
|       | 
|       |  | /S/    STEVEN P. ALSENE              
|Name:  |  | Steven P. Alsene                     
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|Date:  |  | March 6, 2009                        

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.