alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Boston Life Sciences,Inc.****Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,****Unites States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, each of the undersigned officers of Boston Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to his knowledge: 

|  |   |                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|--|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 1)     | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|--|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2)     | the information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. |

 

|   |   |   |                                                                                       |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ ROBERT J. ROSENTHAL                                                                    |
|   |   |   |                                                                                            |
|   |   |   | **Robert J. Rosenthal****Director, Chief Executive Officer and President**                 |
|   |   |   |                                                                                       |
|        |   |   | /s/ JOSEPH P. HERNON                                                                       |
|   |   |   |                                                                                            |
|   |   |   | **Joseph P. Hernon****Executive Vice President, Chief****Financial Officer and Secretary** |
|   |   |   |                                                                                       |
|   |   |   | Dated: August 14, 2003                                                                     |
Exhibit13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RandgoldResources Limited (the "Company") on Form20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Roger A. Williams, FinanceDirector of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

|            |                                                                                                                     |
|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)   | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|            |                                                                                                                                                  |
|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)   | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ Roger A. WilliamsRoger A. Williams Finance Director

June 30,2004

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHARLOTTE L. BRADEN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3529

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 8, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; Joseph C. Fuller, Jr., Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Caroline Joan Picart, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. Jensen, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, VILLANTI, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 569 

To end unemployment payments to jobless millionaires. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2011 

Mr. LANKFORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To end unemployment payments to jobless millionaires. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ending Unemployment 

5 Payments to Jobless Millionaires Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENDING UNEMPLOYMENT PAYMENTS TO JOBLESS 

7 MILLIONAIRES. 

8 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, no Federal funds may be used to make pay10 ments of unemployment compensation (including such 

11 compensation under the Federal-State Extended Com12 pensation Act of 1970 and the emergency unemployment 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 569 IH

1 compensation program under title IV of the Supplemental 

2 Appropriations Act, 2008) in a year to an individual whose 

3 resources in the preceding year was equal to or greater 

4 than $1,000,000. For purposes of the preceding sentence, 

5 with respect to a year, an individual’s resources shall be 

6 determined in the same manner as a subsidy eligible indi7 vidual’s resources are determined for the year under sec8 tion 1860D–14(a)(3)(E) of the Social Security Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 1395w–114(a)(3)(E)). 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The prohibition under sub11 section (a) shall apply to weeks of unemployment begin12 ning on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

          - [STB Finance Docket No. 33931] 

                    Massachusetts Central Railroad Corporation (MCER), a Class III railroad, has filed a notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to acquire from New York Central Lines LLC and CSX Transportation, Inc. (collectively CSX) and operate approximately 1.4 miles ±                           ( print page 61374)                        of line from milepost QBR 0.205 to milepost QBR 1.605, in Palmer, MA.[1] 

The earliest the transaction could be consummated was October 6, 2000, the effective date of the exemption (7 days after the exemption was filed). Counsel for MCER has been contacted by telephone and has acknowledged that the transaction could not be consummated until October 6, 2000. 

                    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void                     *ab initio.*                     Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke does not automatically stay the transaction.                 

An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 33931, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each pleading must be served on James E. Howard, Esq., One Thompson Square, Suite 201, Charlestown, MA 02129. 

Board decisions and notices are available on our website at “WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.” 

Decided: October 10, 2000.

By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of Proceedings. 

Vernon A. Williams, 

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             MCER states that it currently leases the line from CSX and operates it.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-26653 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 26, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 26, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0177. WANDA NUCKLES v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 18CR14954
Exhibit 32
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
  /s/ Michael W. Clarke

Michael W. ClarkePresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 27, 2009/s/ Charles Wimer

Charles WimerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 27, 2009
Exhibit 10.3

As of March 31, 2008

StockerYale, Inc.

32
Hampshire Road

Salem, New Hampshire 03079

Attention:        Chief Financial Officer



| | Re: | Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Warrant No. 2003-2
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------

(Issue Date: February 20, 2004)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to (a) that certain Common Stock Purchase Warrant No. 2003-2 issued by StockerYale, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the Company) on February 20, 2004 in favor of
PSource Structured Debt Limited (as partial assignee of Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.) (the Holder), providing for the purchase of up to an aggregate amount of 700,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company (the
Warrant) and (b) that certain lockup agreement dated as of the date hereof, made by the Holder in favor of the Company with respect to the Securities defined therein. Capitalized terms used herein that are not defined shall
have the meanings given to them in the Warrant.

In consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree that Expiration Date (as defined in the Warrant) is hereby amended such that Expiration Date shall hereafter mean February 22, 2016.

This letter agreement shall become effective upon receipt by the Holder of a copy of this letter agreement executed by the Company.

Except as specifically amended herein, the Warrant shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and confirmed. The
execution, delivery and effectiveness of this letter agreement shall not operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of the Holder, nor constitute a waiver of any provision of the Warrant. This letter agreement shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]



---

This letter agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in one or more counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Any signature delivered by a party by facsimile transmission shall be deemed to be an original signature hereto.



Very truly yours,PSOURCE STRUCTURED DEBT LIMITEDBy:

Laurus Capital Management, LLC, its investment
managerBy:

/s/ Scott BluesteinName:

Scott BluesteinTitle:

Authorized Signatory




|                         |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|CONSENTED AND AGREED TO:
|                        
|STOCKERYALE, INC.       
|                         | 
|By:                      |  | /s/ Mark W. Blodgett                 
|Name:                    |  | Mark W. Blodgett                     
|Title:                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

AMENDMENT TO WARRANT NO. 2003-2

(ISSUE DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2004)
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Charles A. Hinrichs, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Charles A. Hinrichs |
|-------------------------|

Charles A. HinrichsSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 7, 2006

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Smurfit-StoneContainer Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 

----
Exhibit 10.26


 


Cadre
Holdings, Inc.


13386 International
Parkway


Jacksonville, Florida
32218


 


September 1,
2021


 


Brad Williams


12831 River Story Way


Jacksonville, FL 32223


 


		Re:	Employment
                                            Agreement (“Employment Agreement”) dated July 9, 2021, by and between Cadre
                                            Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and Brad Williams (“Employee”)



 


Dear Mr. Williams:


 


This
letter agreement sets forth our mutual agreement to amend the Employment Agreement in accordance with the terms hereof, and constitutes
an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement.


 


The Employment Agreement
is hereby amended as follows:


 


		1.	The reference
                                            to “September 30, 2021” in Section 1(y) of the Employment Agreement
                                            is hereby deleted and replaced with “December 31, 2021”.



 


Except
as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect in
accordance with its terms. This Amendment shall be governed by, and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware,
without regard to the conflicts of law principles thereof. The Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, sets forth the entire understanding
of the parties and merges and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous agreements between the parties pertaining to the subject matter
hereof. This Amendment may be executed by the parties in multiple counterparts and shall only become effective when each party shall
have executed and delivered a counterpart hereof, whether or not the same counterpart is executed and delivered by each party. When so
executed and delivered, each such counterpart shall be deemed an original and all such counterparts shall be deemed one and the same
document. Transmission of images of signed signature pages by facsimile, e-mail or other electronic means shall have the same effect
as the delivery of manually signed documents in person.


 


[signature page follows]


 









    	 	1	 



     


    

 





		Very
                                            truly yours,
	 	 	 
		Cadre
                                            Holdings, Inc.
	 	 	 
		By:	/s/ Warren
    B. Kanders
	 	 	Name:	Warren B. Kanders
		 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer




 


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Brad Williams	 	 
	BRAD WILLIAMS
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of St. Joseph, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth L. Johnson, as
Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

            (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date:  January 4, 2005

/s/ Kenneth L. Johnson
-------------------------------------------------
Kenneth L. Johnson
Title:  Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
#### HOLLEMAN v. STATE.

No. 26514.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 27, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The State moves to dismiss the appeal, because no notice of appeal is shown to have been entered of record in the trial court. Such is requisite in order for this Court to acquire jurisdiction. Ex parte Logan, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 129, 205 S.W.2d 994.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7191

HOWARD CLEVELAND, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus STEVE DOBSON, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-641-1) Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Howard Cleveland, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Howard Cleveland, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order and judgment denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 9, 2001. Cleveland’s notice of appeal was filed on July 4, 2001, the earliest date Cleveland could have submitted the notice to prison officials for mailing. Because Appellant failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 29, 2019

No. 04-18-00402-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF MARIA L. RAYNES, DECEASED,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013PC0369

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On July 26, 2019, Shannon K. Dunn, counsel for Appellant/Cross-Appellee Leah Raynes, 

and Renée Yanta, the proposed substitute as counsel of record, jointly filed an unopposed motion 

to substitute counsel. The motion states that Appellant/Cross-Appellee Leah Raynes has 

received a copy of the motion and has consented to the substitution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b). 

The motion to substitute Renée Yanta as counsel of record and allow Shannon K. Dunn 

to withdraw is GRANTED.

We DIRECT the clerk of this court to update this court’s records accordingly.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of July, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court