alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Robin J. Harvey, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Rival Technologies Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:   July 2, 2007/s/ Robin J. Harvey
Robin J. Harvey
Chief Financial Officer
#### C. B. BROWN, Appellant v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 26359.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 29, 1953.

Warren McDonald and Milton Greer Mell, Tyler, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of beer for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $500.

This is a’ companion case to and'grows out of the same facts and transactions shown in Phelps v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 257 S.W.2d 302.

For the reasons there stated, the judgment in this case is reversed and-the cause remanded.
KPMG

401 South Tryon Street

Suite 2300

Charlotte, NC 28202 1911

Independent Accountants' Report

 

The Board of Directors

Wachovia Bank National Association:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report, that Wachovia Bank National Association (the Bank) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.I., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. Management is responsible for the Bank 's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management 's assertion about the Bank 's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing standards specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank 's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank has complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

KPMG LLP

March 10, 2003

KPMG LLP, KPMG LLP, a US limeted liability partnership, is

A member of KPMG International, a Swiss association
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 200 (Monday, October 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26463]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[Docket No. 000616180-0269-02]
RIN 0648

NOAA Climate and Global Change Program, Program Announcement

AGENCY: Office of Global Programs (OGP), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Revisions to the Notice from NOAA Climate and Global Change 
Program, CLIVAR Element, FOR FY 2001; invitation to submit proposals.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NOAA amends the notice published in the Federal Register on 
August 25, 2000, regarding the NOAA Climate and Global Change Program 
to change the dates for receipt of Letters of Intent and Full Proposals 
(see DATES). NOAA also invites the submission of proposals.

DATES: Letters of Intent must be received no later than November 13, 
2000, with full proposals postmarked on or before January 26, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Proposals should be sent to Office of Global Programs, 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1100 Wayne Avenue, 
Suite 1201, Silver Spring, MD 20910-5603.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irma duPree at the above address or at 
phone: (301) 427-2089 ext 107, Internet: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NOAA Office of Global Programs published 
a notice describing the Climate and Global Change Program, and funding 
area descriptions on August 25, 2000. (65 FR 51799.) The program 
description, evaluation criteria, selection process, background and 
requirements, as well as guidelines for applications are in that notice 
and are not repeated here. The Office hereby revises the dates for the 
submission of the LOI and full proposals (See DATES). The office 
invites the submission of proposals for CLIVAR.

    Program authority: 49 U.S.C. 44720 (b); 33 U.S.C. 883D; 15 
U.S.C. 2904; 15 U.S.C. 2931 et seq.; (CFDA No. 11.431)--Climate and 
Atmospheric Research.

    Dated: October 10, 2000.
David L. Evans,
Assistant Administrator, OAR.
[FR Doc. 00-26463 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-KB-M
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lundie Brown, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that, if we reverse his March 10, 1988 conviction, the guilty plea underlying his July 7, 1988 conviction must be vacated because it was expressly conditioned on the court’s promise that the sentence imposed thereon would run concurrently with, and not exceed, that imposed on the prior conviction *(see, People v Fuggazzatto,*62 NY2d 862; *People v Clark,*45 NY2d 432, 440). Affirmance of defendant’s March 10, 1988 conviction *(see, People v Brown*[appeal No. 1], 167 AD2d 847 [decided herewith]) is dispositive of defendant’s *Fuggazzatto*claim. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J.— robbery, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                  OCT-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                                9848
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        29726
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         163816
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    439638
<PP&E>                                            24690341
<DEPRECIATION>                                      35,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    25385934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              4427486
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             90557
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      25385934
<SALES>                                              35882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     35882
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   1629366
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  688194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1593484)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1593484)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.02)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Spansion
Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i.) the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 26, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(ii.) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 2, 2011



/s/     JOHN H.
KISPERTJohn H. Kispert President and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Troy Miles, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On this appeal from convictions for burglary and criminal mischief, following a jury trial, defendant concedes that there was no objection made to any of the claimed improprieties of the prosecutor during summation. Thus, this issue has not been properly preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Jabbar,*166 AD2d 904; *People v Baris,*161 AD2d 1144; *People v Snyder,*161 AD2d 1205) and we decline to exercise our discretion in the interest of justice. At oral argument, the People candidly conceded that the prosecutor, on several occasions, "crossed the line”, but argued that the prosecutor’s summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial and that, in any event, any error was harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt. We agree. Although the prosecutor was overzealous and improperly vouched for the credibility of the police officers who appeared *937as prosecution witnesses and attacked the credibility of the defense case as a “story” which had been “made up to try to counter the truth”, we conclude that defendant was not deprived of a fair trial *(see, People v Morgan,*66 NY2d 255, 259; *People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396; *People v Dunn,*158 AD2d 941; *People v Widger,*126 AD2d 962, *lv denied*69 NY2d 1011). Moreover, the proof of guilt was overwhelming and any error was harmless *(see, People v Morgan, supra; People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230). The jury gave the evidence the weight it should be accorded and there is no basis in this record to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence *(People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). Given defendant’s prior criminal history, it cannot be said that the sentencing court abused its discretion in sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of 6 to 12 years. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.—burglary, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Den-man, Green and Balio, JJ.
ATTACHMENT 8 

Summary of Incident History 

(Referenced in August 2001 Response to Question 11) 

The following databases were searched for accident history on Paraquat: 

Department of Transportation's Hazardous Materials lncident Reporting System (HMIRS) 

EPA's Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) 

U.S. Coast Guard, National Response Center's Incident Reporting Information System 

(IRIS) 

EPA's Acute Hazardous Events (AHE) Database 

EPA's Accident Release Information Program (ARIP) 

OSHA's Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) 

While covering different time periods, collectively the databases reviewed contained data 

from over twenty years, 1980 to May 2001. The objective of the search was to identify nontransportation-related releases at fixed facilities that had potential for off-site consequences. 

Seven such incidents were found in the database. 

One of these incidents involved a number of chemicals, including Paraquat, which were 

released into sewers from plant tanks. Another involved a fertilizer plant at which cleaning 

tanks were flushed out resulting in runoff across a road. 

Of the five other incidents identified, three were at facilities were fires occurred but here were 

no evacuations, injures or death reported. One incident involved an explosion at a chemical 

facility where various pesticides were stored which resulted in an evacuation but no injuries. 

And one was reported at facility at which a fire occurred where there was an evacuation but 

no reported injuries or deaths.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enesco Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
F. Bradley, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.

May 15, 2003                               By: /s/ Thomas F. Bradley
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
KALAB MILES HENDRIX

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5941

____ _________________________/

Opinion filed June 2, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Edward P. Nickinson, III , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , f or Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J, WOLF and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Harold F. Zagunis, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Sequoia
Residential Funding, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of the
Certificates for periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
reports;

      4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the
terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed in the
reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement; and

      5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement, that is included
in these reports.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter Credit Corporation, as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.,
as Servicer, Cendant Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, Bank of America, N.A.,
as Servicer, and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., as Servicer.

Date: May 31, 2005

/s/ Harold F. Zagunis
---------------------
Signature
Name: Harold F. Zagunis
Title: Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
SERVED: SEPTEMBER 2, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ' ^i-f OPFR^T^^^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS '"" ^'^'="'^"^'^-^ 

WASHINGTON, DC 'ri-n ^cn -3 A A ^ r 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MARY WOOTEN 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09EA0010 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2009-0077 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2008EA070026) has been assigned 

to the undersigned. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding 

shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached 

Service List. 

Chief Administrative 

Attachment - Service List 
mmmmmmmmmmmmmtmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmimmmmmmi^^mmmmmmmmmm in i 11 .111,1111 . ii u ^i i . 1 —,,r-'y^^-^ 

FAA Docket No. tP09EA0010 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

c SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Buildmg - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Robert H. Waldman, Respondent's Counsel 

113 Ridgley Ave. 

Annapolis, MD 21401 

TEL: 410-268-5050 

FAX: 410-269-1541 

Mary Wooten, Respondent 

3851 Old Solomons Island Road 

Harwood, MD 20776 

Christian L. Lewerenz, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, EAL-7 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3273 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

1200 New Jersey AvQnue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Suite iWlOOO, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGrC-430. 

- 2 -
| Date   | November                8, 2007 |   | /S/                Douglas A. Starrett                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                            |   | Douglas                A. StarrettChief                Executive Officer |
|   |                            |   |                                                                     |
| Date   | November                8, 2007 |   | /S/                Randall J. Hylek                                      |
|   |                            |   | Randall                J. HylekChief                Financial Officer    |
#### MORALES v. STATE.

No. 25775.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 26, 1952.

*250
      *No*attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of cattle theft under an indictment alleging theft of two cattle belonging to Pedro Pena. The jury assessed the punishment at 2 years in the penitentiary and rejected his plea for suspension of sentence.

Pedro Pena testified that 2 heifers owned by one Vasquez disappeared from his pasture where he was taking care of them for the owner; that the cattle were in his possession and control and that he was in charge of them at the time they disappeared, under an agreement with Vasquez, who was away picking cotton.

The heifers, together with a calf born to one of them after they were taken away, were found by Ranger Bridge and were identified and returned to Pena’s farm.

Appellant’s confession was offered in evidence wherein he said that he and his brother took the cattle from Pena’s pasture and hauled them to Alice where the brother sold them at the sales barn.

There was other testimony corroborating the state’s theory which need not be discussed.

Appellant testified and denied any knowledge of the theft. He claimed also that he did not know what was in the confession when he signed it. The jury, under appropriate instructions from the court, accepted the state’s theory, and the evidence sustains their verdict.

We overrule appellant’s contention that ownership was not properly alleged. The state may allege ownership of personal property to be in the actual owner, or in one who exercises the actual care, control and custody thereof, known in law as the special owner. See Branch’s Ann.P.C. Sec. 2434, p. 1316.

Under the facts, Pedro Pena was shown to be the special owner of the cattle, and there was no variance between the indictment alleging ownership in him and in the proof to the effect that he exercised care, control and custody over the cattle for the true owner, Vasquez.

The evidence being sufficient to sustain the conviction and no reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.