alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                             
|Texas State Offshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                             
|Texas State Offshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 3      | 2      | 0      | 3      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
1 The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-2656

___________ Rahjah Jahhar, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Minnesota. * AT&T Communications, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 3, 2003 Filed: December 9, 2003

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Rahjah Jahhar appeals the district court’s 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review of the record, see Gordon v. Hansen , 168 F.3d 1109, 1113 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (de novo standard of review), we agree that Jahhar failed to state a claim because he did not allege any state action, seeYoungblood v. Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc. , 266 F.3d 851,-2- 855 (8th Cir. 2001) (“Only state actors can be held liable under Section 1983."), cert. denied , 535 U.S. 1017 (2002). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Union Trust Company of Rochester, as Executor of Louisa A. G. Liebeck, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Monroe County,

November 27, 1951.

*Jacob Ark*for Union Trust Company of Rochester, as executor, petitioner.

G. Robert Wither, S.

In order to complete the distribution of this estate the executor has asked the court to construe the effect of paragraph ‘ ‘ Second ’ ’ of the will herein, which is as follows: “I give and bequeath the sum of Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) to Rev. Sebastian B. Englerth, Rector of St. Johns Evangelist Church, Greece, New York, to be used as he may see fit for Church purposes. I also give and bequeath to the said Rev. Sebastian B. Englerth the sum of Two hundred dollars ($200.00), to be used for the saying of masses for the repose of my soul ”.

The Rev. Sebastian B. Englerth, named in said bequest, died 15 years before the testatrix’ death. The court is asked to determine the validity of the two gifts.

The first bequest “to be used as he may see fit for Church purposes ”, is clearly a gift in trust for religious or charitable purposes. (Personal Property Law, § 12; *Matter of Rupprecht, 271*App. Div. 376, affd. 297 N. Y. 462.)

Although there are many early decisions in the lower courts of this State holding that bequests for the purpose of saying masses are not for religious or charitable purposes, it has long since been held that they do constitute gifts for such purposes, and that the beneficiaries receive the gifts in trust therefor. *(Matter of Morris,*227 N. Y. 141; *Matter of Idem,*256 App. Div. 124, affd. 280 N. Y. 756; *Matter of Breckwoldt,*176 Misc. *959549; *Matter of Neary,*194 Misc. 200; *Matter of Lawless,*194 Misc. 844; 3 Jessup-Redfield on Surrogates’ Law & Practice, § 2821.)

Accordingly, the nominated beneficiary herein having predeceased testatrix, both of the said bequests are saved by the statute (Personal Property Law, § 12), and the trusts vest in the court to administer. *(Matter of Idem, supra,*pp. 126-127.)

As to the gift “ for Church purposes ”, the court will entertain the suggestions of the trustees and pastor of St. Johns Evangelist Church of Greece, N. Y. for the name or names of the person or persons to receive such fund in trust for the purpose specified. As to the gift for masses, the court designates the pastor of St. Johns Evangelist Church of Greece, New York to receive the bequest for such purpose, conditioned upon his filing before presentation of the decree hereon his duly acknowledged consent to receive the legacy and perform the masses in accordance with testatrix’ express wishes.

Submit decree accordingly.
NRS 17.115(4) and NRCP 68, the district court must analyze the factors

established inBeattie v. Thomas, 99 Nev. 579, 588-89, 668 P.2d 268, 274 (1983). Similarly, when determining the reasonable value of an attorney's services in a motion for attorney fees, the district court must analyze the factors established inBrunzell v. Golden Gate National Bank, 85 Nev. 345, 349-50, 455 P.2d 31, 33 (1969). The district court must then provide sufficient reasoning and findings concerning those factors in its order. Shuette, 121 Nev. at 865, 124 P.3d at 549. But if the district court's order fails to provide such reasoning and findings, we will nevertheless defer to the district court's discretion in awarding attorney fees if the record indicates that the district court properly evaluated the Beattie and Brunzell factors. Wynn v. Smith, 117 Nev. 6, 13, 16 P.3d 424, 428-29 (2001). In this case, appellant argues that attorney fees were improperly awarded because appellant's former counsel controlled the case, did not inform appellant about the case, took actions without appellant's knowledge or permission, and made mistakes during the case. Appellant's arguments, however, are not relevant to the attorney fees determination here. See Beattie, 99 Nev. at 588-89, 668 P.2d at 274; Brunzell, 85 Nev. at 349-50, 455 P.2d at 33; see also Lange v. Hickman, 92 Nev. 41, 43, 544 P.2d 1208, 1209 (1976) (holding that notice to an attorney is notice to the client, and if the attorney neglects the client's case, the client's recourse is an action against the attorney).

Here, although the district court failed to set forth any findings of fact or its reasoning in the order awarding attorney fees, respondent's motion for attorney fees contains a discussion of the Beattie andBrunzell factors and a detailed breakdown of incurred attorney fees,

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2

### J.

and the district court's order indicates that a hearing was held on the contested attorney fees motion. Thus, although written findings supporting an attorney fees award are preferred for appellate review, 

### Wynn, 117 Nev. at 13, 16 P.3d at 428-29, the record indicates that the district court evaluated the 

### Beattie and 

### Brunzell factors and awarded respondent approximately half of its requested fees as reasonable attorney fees. In this case, we will defer to the district court's discretion in awarding attorney fees. 

### Id. Accordingly, having considered appellant's arguments and the record on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. We therefore

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J. Douglas

Saitta
cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge Adrian Niculescu Littler Mendelson/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 

### 3
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Randgold Resources Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger
A. Williams, Finance Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     /s/ Roger A. Williams
     ----------------------------
     Roger A. Williams
     Finance Director
     June 25, 2007
```
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Win Gaming Media, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: April 15, 2011
  /s/ Shlomi ZedkiaShlomi ZedkiaChief Financial Officer
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-2565

Lower Tribunal No. CF15-000502-XX

_____________________________

LORENZO MARTINEZ,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County.

Melissa Gravitt, Judge.

May 28, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WHITE, MIZE and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Lorenzo Martinez, DeFuniak Springs, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Exhibit 10.3
 Director* Compensation Summary
 Meeting Fees
   Committee Meeting Fees
  Equity Compensation
   *
    
    Includes directors that are also employees of the Company. Named Executive Officer Compensation Summary
  Executive Officer
    
    Current Salary
    
    

BonusDwight B. Grizzell, President
    
    $
    247,910
    
    
    $
    600Grace D. McKinzie
    
    $
    159,697
    
    
    $
    5,600Michael Brown
    
    $
    160,294
    
    
    $
    5,600
  
    
    Participate in the Companys cash bonus plan;
    
    Participate in the Companys equity incentive programs, which currently
involves the award of stock options pursuant to the Companys Stock Option Plan; and
    
    Participate in the Companys broad-based benefit programs generally available
to its employees, including health, disability and life insurance programs and the
Companys 401(k) Plan.
Verizon I My Verizon IVerizon Message Center 7/28/14 11:48 PM I come to speak to you today as a concerned citizen and property owner in Richmond, Virginia. I have already seen some ofthe effects ofclimate change in my own small property. I have observed that we have had more intense storms with heavier rainfall and with more frequency in the pastfive years than in previous years.A few years ago when Hurricane Irene came through Richmond, I lost the entire fence along one side ofmy property. In another storm my next door neighbor had a tree fall onto the front ofthe house which damaged windows, a porch and part ofthe roof.It was a traumatizing experience to go through these storms and see the damage they caused. I have read thathaving more severe storms is one ofthe effects of

**-~l;~ate** change.Scientists have established that carbon pollution is the main contributor to climate

**change~** 1 >1 powerplants produce 40%ofthe carbon pollution in our country. Therefore itis important to set a \dstandard for the coal fired plants in orderto prevent more serious changes in our climate in the future. I am also concerned about the effects of climate change onVirginia's Coast.It is important to take measures to cut back oncarbon pollution in orderto prevent increased warming, sea level rise and flooding of Virginia's Coast.It would be devastating to the tourist business ofVirginia Beach and to the naval base in Norfolk ifwe had majorflooding there.I have read thatVirginia's coastis the second most vulnerable to flooding after the Gulf Coast. Lastly,I am concerned about health issues that are the consequence of carbon pollution in our environment.The state ofVirginia has the highest rates ofcases of asthma in the country.I thinkthat ifcarbon pollution can be reduced by having limits at coal fired powerplants thatthis will lower the number of asthma cases in our state and in the country. I fully supportthe E.P.A. in setting strong standards for limiting carbon pollution from coal fired power plants.Mary 

### E. Crutchfield 4315 Kensington Ave. Richmond, VA. 23221

https://mail.verizon.com/webmail/driver?nimlet=showmessages&view=emails#maii_Emails_INBOX Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration Washington, DC District Advisory Council, located in the metropolitan area of Washington, DC, will hold a public meeting from 9 a.m.-11 a.m., Wednesday, October 11, 2000, at The Washington Times, 3600 New York Avenue, NE., Washington, DC, to discuss such matters as may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present. 

For further information, write or call Anita L. Irving, Public Information Officer, U.S. Small Business Administration, 1110 Vermont Avenue, NW., Suite 900, (P.O. Box 34500), Washington, DC 20043-4500; telephone 202-606-4000, ext. 275. 

Bettie Baca, 

Counselor to the Administrator/Public Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 00-25795 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of St. Joseph, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth L. Johnson, as
Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o
            (d)); and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date:  April 15, 2005                           /s/ Kenneth L. Johnson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Name:  Kenneth L. Johnson
                                                Title: Treasurer and Principal
                                                       Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cytation Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard Fisher, Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard
Fisher                            Richard
FisherChairman of the Board and Chief Financial Officer

December 19, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5641 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5641

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Eptam Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

  Mr. Gosar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Eptam Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EPTAM TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        S-ethyl-N,N-di-n-   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          propylthiocarbama                                                 12/31/2015
                          te (Eptam
                          Technical) (CAS
                          No. 759-94-4)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2930.20.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RandgoldResources Limited (the "Company") on Form20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, D. Mark Bristow, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

/s/ D. Mark Bristow D. MarkBristow Chief Executive Officer June 30,2004

----