alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

 
| **Entity ****(1)**                           | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|---------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|
| BHR  Partners, LLC                                |       | Delaware                                    |
| BHR, Inc.  (2)                               |       | Delaware                                    |
| BHR  BT, Inc.                                |       | Delaware                                    |
| BHR  Business Trust                               |       | Maryland                                    |
| Behringer  Harvard Operating Partnership I LP (3) |       | Texas                                       |

 

----

(1) Doesnot include subsidiaries of Behringer Harvard Operating Partnership I LP, whichholds our investment assets.

 

(2) BHRBT, Inc. owns 100% of the interests of BHR Business Trust.

 

(3) As of December 31, 2008, BHR, Inc. was the solegeneral partner and owner of 17 general partnership units in Behringer HarvardOperating Partnership I LP, our operating partnership.  As of December 31, 2008, BHR BusinessTrust was a limited partner and owner of approximately 254.2 millionpartnership units in Behringer Harvard Operating Partnership I LP.  As of December 31, 2008, BHR Partners,LLC was a limited partner and owner of approximately 34.6 millionpartnership units in Behringer Harvard Operating Partnership I LP.  Minority interest not owned by us consists of432,586 partnership units in Behringer Harvard Operating Partnership I LP.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 I, James M.
Papada, III, Chief Executive Officer of Technitrol, Inc., certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
the
  quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 29, 2007 (the
  Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and(2)
information
  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the financial condition and results of operations of Technitrol, Inc.  Dated: August
  6, 2007
/s/ James M.
  Papada, IIIJames M.
  Papada, III A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Technitrol, Inc., and will be
retained by Technitrol, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies
the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### L. K. BOWEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27173.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 17, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

EER CURIAM.

The unlawful sale of whisky in a dry area is' the offense; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5661 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5661

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1-Hydroxy cyclohexyl phenyl 
                                ketone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1-Hydroxy cyclohexyl phenyl 
                                ketone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-HYDROXY CYCLOHEXYL PHENYL KETONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1-Hydroxy           Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          cyclohexyl phenyl                                                 12/31/2015
                          ketone (CAS No.
                          947-19-3)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2914.40.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2724 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2724

 To exclude from gross income compensation provided for victims of the 
       March 29, 2013, pipeline oil spill in Mayflower, Arkansas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2013

Mr. Griffin of Arkansas (for himself, Mr. Womack, Mr. Crawford, and Mr. 
   Cotton) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To exclude from gross income compensation provided for victims of the 
       March 29, 2013, pipeline oil spill in Mayflower, Arkansas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mayflower Oil Spill Tax Relief Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. MAYFLOWER, ARKANSAS OIL SPILL COMPENSATION EXCLUDED FROM GROSS 
              INCOME.

    For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986--
            (1) the March 29, 2013, pipeline rupture and oil spill in 
        Mayflower, Arkansas, shall be treated as a qualified disaster 
        under section 139(c) of such Code, and
            (2) any compensation provided to or for the benefit of a 
        victim of such disaster shall be treated as a qualified 
        disaster relief payment under section 139(b) of such Code.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132998 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132998 

 COA: 263559 

Gratiot CC: 04-004889-FC 

JOHN DAVID HENDRICKSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 12, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 6, 2014.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D13-1396 & 3D13-1274

Lower Tribunal No. 10-45095

________________

Bay Point Schools, Inc., etc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Bay Point School Properties, Inc.,

Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marcia B.

Caballero and Antonio Arzola, Judges.

Rasco Klock Perez & Nieto, and Joseph P. Klock, Jr. and Roberto E. Moran,

for appellant.

White & Case LLP, and Raoul G. Cantero, David P. Draigh, and Jesse L.

Green; Law Offices of Thomas Manick, P.A., and Thomas E. Manick, for

appellee.

Before SUAREZ, SALTER, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Coral Reef Drive Land Dev., LLC v. Duke Realty Ltd.

P’ship, 45 So. 3d 897, 902 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Room 940. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register.**

*Agreement No.:*                     011728.                 

*Title:*                     Maersk Sealand/APL Mediterranean Slot Charter Agreement                 

*Parties:*

 A.P. Moller-Maersk Sealand (“MSL”) 

APL Co. Pte. Ltd. and American President Lines, Ltd. (collectively, “APL”)

*Synopsis:*                     The proposed agreement authorizes MSL to charter slots to APL in the trade between U.S. East and Gulf Coasts ports and ports in the Mediterranean, including ports in Spain, Malta, and Italy.                 

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: October 6, 2000.

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26231  Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
**Exhibit 99.6**

 

**Consentof Meyers Norris Penny LLP, Chartered Accountants**

** **

** **

To the Board of Directors

CANADIAN SUPERIOR ENERGYINC.

 

 

We hereby consent to the use in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of:

 
|   | – |   | our Auditors’ Report dated March 27, 2008 with respect  to the consolidated balance sheets of Canadian Superior Energy Inc. (the  “Company”) as at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the consolidated statements  of operations, comprehensive loss and deficit and cash flows for each of the  years in the three year period ended December 31, 2007; and |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | – |   | our Report of Independent Registered Public  Accounting Firm dated March 27, 2008 on the effectiveness of internal control  over financial reporting as at December 31, 2007;                                                                                                                                                                                           |

 

each of which is contained in this annual report on Form 40-F of theCompany for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

 

 

/s/ Meyers Norris Penny LLP

Chartered Accountants

 

 

Calgary, Canada

March 27, 2008

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6135

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BARRINGTON ISAACS, a/k/a Orville Griswold,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(2:98-cr-00356-DCN-3)

Submitted: May 20, 2014 Decided: May 23, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barrington Isaacs, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Peter Thomas 

Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Barrington Isaacs appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing and denying his 

motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. 

Isaacs, No. 2:98-cr-00356-DCN-3 (D.S.C. Dec. 16, 2013 & Jan. 8, 

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5698 

To suspend temporarily the duty on S-(2-benzothiazolyl)-2-(2-amino-thiazol4-yl)-2-acetoxyimino thioacetate (Thioester). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself and Mr. GERLACH) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on S-(2-benzothiazolyl)- 

2-(2-amino-thiazol-4-yl)-2-acetoxyimino thioacetate 

(Thioester). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. S-(2-BENZOTHIAZOLYL)-2-(2-AMINO-THIAZOL-4- 

4 YL)-2-ACETOXYIMINO THIOACETATE 

5 (THIOESTER). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5698 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 S-(2-benzothiazolyl)-2-(2- 

amino-thiazol-4-yl)-2- 

acetoxyimino thioacetate 

(Thioester) (CAS No. 

104797–47–9) (provided 

for in subheading 

2934.20.40) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(b)

                       AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION
                          ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE


         I, John Weisickle, do hereby certify that I am the Vice
President/Finance of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California
corporation (the "Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its
capacity as servicer (the "Servicer") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement") dated as of July 1, 2002 among the Servicer, American Honda
Receivables Corp., as Seller, Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as
Owner Trustee of Honda Auto Receivables 2002-3 Owner Trust and U.S. Bank
National Association as Indenture Trustee as follows:

                  (i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the nine
         month period ended March 31, 2003, and of its performance under the
         Agreement has been made under my supervision;

                  (ii) To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon
         such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the
         Agreement throughout such period; and

                  (iii) To the best of my knowledge and information, no Event of
         Default nor any event which with the giving of notice or lapse of time,
         or both, would become an Event of Default under the Agreement, has
         occurred or is continuing.

         This certificate is being delivered to the Trustee pursuant to Section
3.11 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement effective July 1, 2002, which terms and
conditions are incorporated in the Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 19th day of May,
2003.



/s/ John I. Weisickle
Name:    J. I. Weisickle
Title:   Vice President/Finance
#### Tawna Provoncha et al., Respondents, v 128771 Canada, Ltd., et al., Appellants.

Casey, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Viscardi, J.), entered November 16, 1989 in Saratoga County, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order.

The protective order challenged by defendants on this appeal concerns those portions of defendants’ notice of inspection which sought disclosure of copies of the pleadings of the divorce action between plaintiffs and disclosure of medical records pertaining to a hysterectomy which plaintiff Tawna Provoncha underwent prior to the accident that is the subject of this personal injury action. According to defendants, plaintiffs’ complaint, which is not included in the record on appeal, attributes plaintiffs’ sexual and marital problems to the subject accident. Thus, defendants argue that information concerning the earlier hysterectomy and subsequent divorce action is relevant and material to this action. Plaintiffs’ bill of particulars, however, does not include any reference to sexual or marital problems in the list of items for which damages are *594sought, and in their brief on appeal plaintiffs state that neither their marital discord nor diminished sexual relations are claimed as having any causal connection to the accident. Supreme Court, therefore, had an adequate basis for granting plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order.

Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To
the Board of Directors of
Xplore Technologies Corp.

We
hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-161890) and the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-164741) of Xplore Technologies Corp. of our report dated June 2, 2010, related to the consolidated balance
sheets of Xplore Technologies Corp. and subsidiary as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of loss, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended,
which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xplore Technologies Corp. for the year ended March 31, 2010.

/s/
PMB Helin Donovan, LLP
PMB Helin Donovan, LLP

Austin,
TX
June 2, 2010

---



QuickLinks
#### BOROQUEZ v. STATE.

No. 26447.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 3, 1953.

Richard C. White and Richard Burges Perrenot, El Paso, for appellant.

William E. Clayton, Dist. Atty., Owen H. Ellington, Asst. Dist. Atty., C. Rutledge Isaacks, Asst. Dist. Atty., El Paso, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

.DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Appellant, who a few months prior had been honorably discharged from the army, occupied, with his mother, Josefa Alpuente, one room of a five-room house. The remainder of the house was .occupied by two other parties and their families.

Appellant stands here convicted of the wilful burning of the house of Josefa Alpuente, with punishment assessed at three years in the penitentiary.

The sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction is challenged.

Shortly after midnight, appellant came home drunk. He awakened his mother and began teasing her and, as she testified, acting “like Dracula.” The mother became frightened, left the room, and went to the room of another occupant of the house. She later went to the house of a neighbor. About the time she left the house, appellant was seen carrying some personal effects and a small table out of the room, from which smoke was issuing.

Alvarez, a special officer, testified that when he arrived at the scene of the fire appellant was standing in front of the house watching the fire. Upon his asking if there was any one in the housé, appellant replied, “I don’t give a damn if the whole place burns down with everybody in it.” The witness further testified that appellant made no effort to help in getting people out of the burning house.

The fire was confined to the one room of house and was soon put out.

A strong odor of kerosene permeated appellant’s clothing -when he was apprehended at the. fire. There was also a strong odor of kerosene in the room as well as on the mattress and bedclothes, and- kerosene was found at different places on the floor.

The mother testified that she kept a brown gallon-bottle of kerosene on a shelf in the room, which she used in a lantern and also to burn trash in the back yard.

It is upon these facts that this conviction rests.

The jury disregarded the appellant’s defense that the burning of the room was accidental and riot the result of any wilful *319intent or purpose on his part to set fire to and burn the house of his mother. His testimony seems to suggest that the fire started from a cigarette after he had fallen asleep and that a can- of kerosene turned over in the room after the fire had started.

We are constrained to agree that the facts stated warranted the jury’s conclusion of guilt.

The conclusion that the house was in-cendiarily set afire- is authorized by the presence of kerosene in various places and on different objects of the room. Appellant’s immediate presence there, as well as his acts and conduct at the time of the fire, warrant the conclusion that he was criminally connected therewith.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.