alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5694 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5694

      To extend the suspension of duty on certain fluoropolymers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

 Mr. Paulsen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the suspension of duty on certain fluoropolymers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FLUOROPOLYMERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.62 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain fluoropolymers) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 21, 2011

h1114 

# Order

November 21, 2011

142930 & (21)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 142930

COA: 298508

RITA WILSON, Wayne CC: 88

- 007896

- FC

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2011 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

m otion for remand is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5613 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5613

  To suspend temporarily the duty on cellular plastic sheets for nano-
                           retention filters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Ellison introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on cellular plastic sheets for nano-
                           retention filters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CELLULAR PLASTIC SHEETS FOR NANO-RETENTION FILTERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Cellular plastic    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          sheets of poly-                                                   12/31/2015
                          tetrafluoroethyle
                          ne with retention
                          rating of 10-30
                          nanometers, for
                          use in
                          manufacturing
                          filters of
                          heading 8421
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3921.19.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Robin J. Harvey, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Rival Technologies Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.  Date:   July 2, 2007/s/ Robin J. Harvey
Robin J. Harvey
Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1

























CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries for the period ended April 3, 2005, as indicated in our report dated April 26, 2005; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.



We are aware that our report referred to above, is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements File No.'s 333-02683, 333-05231, 333-15851, 333-43055, 333-51189, 333-51181, 333-57779, 333-84483 and 333-86492.



We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.







/S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP







Dayton, Ohio

May 2, 2005
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 4, 2017

No. 04-16-00732-CR

Gerardo GUTIERREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR4590

Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant attempts to appeal the trial court’s “decision to deny by operation of law his 

motion requesting appointment of counsel pursuant to article 64, Code of Criminal Procedure.” 

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 64.01(c) (West Supp. 2015).

A trial court’s denial of a request for appointed counsel to file a postconviction motion 

for DNA testing is not immediately appealable. Gutierrez v. State, 307 S.W.3d 318, 319, 323 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2010). “Such an appeal is premature; a motion for appointed counsel is a 

preliminary matter that precedes the initiation of Chapter 64 proceedings.” Id. at 323. Thus, it 

appears that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because there is no final judgment or order 

subject to appeal. See id. We therefore ORDER appellant to show cause in writing why this 

appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction within thirty days from the date of this 

order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the 

jurisdictional issue.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of January, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### NICHOLS v. STATE.

No. 25361.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 20, 1951.

Rehearing *Denied Oct*10, 1951.

•Reynold M.- Gardner, Amarillo, for, appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $200. ,

The sole question presented' for review is whether an indictment charging one with driving an automobile while intoxicated will support a conviction when the proof shows that he was driving a truck. As will be seen, a disposition of this case hinges upon the definition of the word “automobile.”

Ballentine’s Law Dictionary with Pronunciations defines an automobile as “a wheeled vehicle, propelled by steam, electricity, or gasoline, and used for the transportation of *persons*or *merchandise,”*

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Rawle’s 3rd Edition; says that an automobile is “a vehicle for the carriage of *passengers*or *freight,*propelled 'by its own motor.” ■

Black’s Law Dictionary, 3rd Edition, defines automobile as “a vehicle for the transportation of *persons*or *property*on the highway, carrying its own motive power and not operated upon fixed tracks.”

Webster’s New International Dictionary, 2d Edition, Unabridgéd, gives us the following definition: “An automobile vehicle or mechanism; esp., a self-propelled vehicle suitable for use on a street or roadway.”

Other jurisdictions have given the term “automobile” a broad interpretation. In Stanley v. Tomlin, 143 Va. 187, 129 S.E. 379, 380, it was held that “ ‘Automobile’ is general name, adopted by proper approval for *all*forms'of self-propelling vehicles for use on highways and streets for general *freight*and *passenger*service; a wheeled *397vehicle propelled ¡by gasoline, steam, or electricity.”

The term “automobile”, has been held to include a “truck” in the following cases: Kellaher v. City of Portland, 57 Or. 575, 110 P. 492, 112 P. 1076; Wiese v. Polzer, 212 Wis. 337, 248 N.W. 113; Bethlehem Motors Corporation v. Flynt, 178 N.C. 399, 100 S.E. 693; Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Roland, 45 Ga.App. 467, 165 S.E. 293.

The Kansas City Court of Appeals in Hoover v. National Casualty Co., 236 Mo.App. 1093, 162 S.W.2d 363, approved the Bouvier’s Law Dictionary definition set forth above.

- In'the light of the foregoing definitions and decisions, it is the holding of this Court- that the term “automobile” ás used by the Legislature in defining the offense of driving while intoxicated is a generic term which includes the motor vehicle commonly known as a “truck.”

Finding'no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1




Certification of Chief Executive Officer


of Skinny Nutritional Corp.


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Skinny Nutritional Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Salaman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 15, 2011





/s/ Michael SalamanMichael SalamanChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 195 (Friday, October 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Correction

AGENCY: Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, Department of 
Labor.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In document 00-25231 on page 58822 in the issue of Monday, 
October 2, 2000, make the following correction:
    In the first column in the third paragraph, the approval expires on 
March 3, 2000. It should be changed to read on March 31, 2000.

    Dated: October 3, 2000.
Gerald B. Lindrew,
Deputy Director, Office of Policy and Research, Pension and Welfare 
Benefits Administration, Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 00-25775 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                          61,901
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  229,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (11,421)
<INVENTORY>                                    151,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               469,776
<PP&E>                                         280,585
<DEPRECIATION>                               (168,431)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 605,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          185,825
<BONDS>                                         58,043
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           47,727
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     297,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   605,155
<SALES>                                        524,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               524,272
<CGS>                                          441,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  441,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,258
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,291
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,014
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,277
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,277
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54


</TABLE>
##### 



AMENDMENT   Mountain National Bank
Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement
 THIS AMENDMENT
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 The Following Articles Amended in their Entirety:
 ARTICLE IV: DEFINITIONS
 I. Disability
  ARTICLE V: RETIREMENT BENEFIT AND POST-RETIREMENT DEATH BENEFIT
 th




---



##### 



ARTICLE X: CHANGE OF CONTROL
 th
 IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE
 WITNESS:
    
    FOR MOUNTAIN NATIONAL BANK:Michael Patterson
    
    /s/ Dwight B. Grizzell(name)
    
    (signature of authorized officer of Plan Sponsor)/s/ Michael Patterson
    
    Dwight B. Grizzell(signature of witness)
    
    (print name)VP/HR
    
    President & CEO(title if any)
    
    (title of signing officer)THE EXECUTIVE:/s/ Michael L. Brown(signature)Michael L. Brown(print name)
| Michael      W. Clarke                                                                |   | $      | 315,000 |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------|--------|
|   President      and Chief Executive Officer                                |   |   |    |   |
|                                                                                  |   |   |    |   |
| Dean      Hackemer                                                                    |   | $      | 302,000 |   |
|   President      and Chief Executive Officer, Access National MortgageCorp. |   |   |    |   |
|                                                                                  |   |   |    |   |
| Robert      C. Shoemaker                                                              |   | $      | 252,000 |   |
|    Executive      Vice President and Chief Credit Officer              |   |   |    |   |
|                                                                                  |   |   |    |   |
| Charles      Wimer                                                                    |   | $      | 200,000 |   |
|    Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer           |   |   |    |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of operations and consolidated balance sheet and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000094679
<NAME> STORER COMMUNICATIONS INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,282
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,935)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         703,413
<DEPRECIATION>                               (329,182)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,868,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        126,086
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,191,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,868,870
<SALES>                                        321,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               321,077
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (279,089)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (12,474)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,738
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (15,508)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,230
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The company utilizes an unclassified balance sheet. As a result, a zero value
is reported for both current assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26287]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-28-000]


Mojave Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

October 6, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 4, 2000, Mojave Pipeline Company 
(Mojave) tendered for filing to its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective date of 
November 4, 2000:

First Revised Sheet No. 242
First Revised Sheet No. 506

    Mojave states that the tariff sheets delete Mojave's pro forma 
Trading Partner Agreement and implement the use of the Gas Industry 
Standards Board's Model Trading Partner Agreement.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26287 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M