alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5547 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5547

          To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Acetyltoluene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Benishek introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Acetyltoluene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-ACETYLTOLUENE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        4-Acetyltoluene     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 122-00-                                                  12/31/2015
                          9) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2914.39.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

APRIL 29, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WIT H RULE

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED99476 SAMER Z. MURATOVIC, APP V. STATE OF MISS OURI,

RES

2. ED99669 ETHEL MCFARLAND, APP V. ROBERT TRAME, ET AL, RES

3. ED99939 AM BUILDERS CONTRACT, RES V. R.G. ROSS, APP

4. ED100219 CHARLES NUNLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI , RES
#### Norstar Bank of Upstate New York, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Bennett Funding Group, Doing Business as Aloha Leasing, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against defendant for recovery of collateral pursuant to a security agreement between the Bank of New York and Cole Copy Systems, Inc. Plaintiff failed to establish, by evidence in admissible form, that it was an assignee of the Bank of New York’s perfected security interest. Moreover, plaintiff has not established that the collateral was in fact transferred, or that defendant is in possession of the collateral or the proceeds from the sale of it. Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for an order limiting issues of fact for trial *(see,*CPLR 3212 [g]; *Newell Co. v Rice,*158 AD2d 993). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Miller, J.— summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              209
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          233
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
                                               


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 3(iv)

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION                          RECEIVED
Form 205  Revised October 1, 2002                  2003 NOV-6 PM 1:07
Fling fee: $25.00                                  SECRETARY OF STATE
Deliver to Colorado Secretary of State             STATE OF COLORADO
Business Division
1560 Broadway, Suite 200
Devnver, CO 80202-5169                          Above space for office use only
This document must be typed or machine printed
copies fo filed documens may be obtained at www.sos.state.co.us


Pursuant to ss. 7-110-106 and part 3 of article 90 of title 7, Colorado Revised
Statutes (C.R.S.), these Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation
are delivered to the Colorado Secretary of State for filing.

1.  The name of the corporation is St. Joseph Energy, Inc.
      (If changing the name of the corporation, indicate name of corporation
      BEFORE the name change)

2.  The date the following amendment(s) to the Articles of Incorporation
    was adopted: 11/04/03

3.  The text of each amendment adopted (include attachment if additional
    space needed):___________________________________________________________

4.  If changing the corporation name, the new name of the corporation is:
        St. Joseph, Inc.

5.  If providing for an exchange, reclassification, or cancellation of issued
    shares, provisions for implementing the amendment if not contained in the
    amendment itself:______________________________________________________

6.  Indicate manner in which amendment(s) was adopted (mark only one):

    [ ]  No shares have been issued or Directors Elected -
         Adopted by lncorporator(s)

    [ ]  No shares have been issued but Directors Elected -
         Adopted by the board of directors

    [X]  Shares have been issued but shareholder action was not required -
         Adopted by the board of directors

    [ ]  The number of votes cast for the amendment(s) by each voting gorup
         entitled to vote separately on the amendment(s) was sufficient for
         approval by that voting group - Adopted by the shareholders

7.  Effective date (if not to be effective upon filing)_______
    (Not to exceed 90 days)

8.  The (a) name or names, and (b) mailing address or addresses, of any one
    or more of the individuals who cause this document to be delivered for
    filing, and to whom the Secretary of State may deliver notice if filing
    of this document is refused, are:
       Sara Porter 555 E. 10th Ave., Suite 105, Denver, CO 80203

Causing a document to be delivered to the secretary of state for filing shall
constitute the affirmation or acknowledgment of each individual causing such
delivery, under penalties of perjury, that the document is the individual's
act and deed or the act and deed of the entity on whose behalf the individual
is causing the document to be delivered for filing and that the facts stated
in the document are true.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5670 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5670

 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-
                          piperidyl)sebacate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-
                          piperidyl)sebacate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BIS(2,2,6,6-TETRAMETHYL-4-PIPERIDYL)SEBACATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Bis(2,2,6,6-        Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          tetramethyl-4-                                                    12/31/2015
                          piperidyl)sebacat
                          e (CAS No. 52829-
                          07-9) (provided
                          for in subheading
                          2933.99.82)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

FINAL AGENDA

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)

CHEMICAL SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CSAC)

OPEN INTERNET VIRTUAL MEETING

MAY 11, 2016

MEETING URL (for video):

https://epawebconferencing.acms.com/oscp_csac/

TELECONFERENCE # (for audio):

Conference ID: 96883891

Pre-registered participants: 844-294-0065

Participants not pre-registered: 844-297-0156

CSAC WEB SITE

http://www.epa.gov/csac

DOCKET NUMBER: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2015–0234

Orientation Session for the Chemical Safety Advisory Committee (CSAC)

Please note that all times are approximate.

1:00 P.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures – Scott Lynn,

Ph.D., Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy

(OSCP), EPA

1:05 P.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members – Kenneth Portier,

Ph.D., Chair, Chemical Safety Advisory Committee

1:10 P.M. Welcome and Opening Remarks – Laura Bailey, M.S., Supervisory Physical 

Scientist, OSCP, EPA

1:15 P.M. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Overview – Jeff Morris, 

Ph.D., Deputy Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), EPA

2:00 P.M. TSCA Work Plan Chemicals – Tala Henry, Ph.D., Director, Risk Assessment 

Division (RAD), OPPT

2:35 P.M. OPPT’s Risk Assessment Process – Tala Henry, Ph.D., Director, RAD, OPPT

3:10 P.M. Break

Wednesday, May 11, 2016
2

3:25 P.M. Public Comments

5:00 P.M. Adjourn
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. 487


Exhibit 4.1



 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


240 Greenwich
Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286


 


 


 


September 10, 2021


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 533 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York Mellon
is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in the Registration
Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated
therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on September 9, 2021, in accordance with the valuation method
set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New
York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-257106) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this
consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                        


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
**Exhibit 10.4(b)**

**STOCKERYALE, INC.**

**AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE2000 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN**

 

             This AMENDMENT NO. 1 dated as ofJune 26, 2001 (this “Amendment”) to the StockerYale, Inc. 2000 Employee StockPurchase Plan (the “Plan”), is adopted by the Board of Directors on the datehereof.  All capitalized terms used andnot defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan.

             Pursuant to Section 18 of the Plan,the Board of Directors hereby amends Section 3 of the Plan by deleting it inits entirety and replacing it with the following:

 
|   | 3. | Eligibility. All employees of the  Company (including employees who are also directors of the Company) and all  employees of each Designated Subsidiary (as defined in Section 11) are  eligible to participate in any one or more of the Offerings under the Plan,  provided that they are customarily employed by the Company or a Designated  Subsidiary for more than twenty (20) hours a week and they are employed by  the Company prior to the first day of the relevant Offering Period. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

             Except as so amended, the Plan inall other respects is confirmed and ratified and shall remain and continue infull force and effect.

Adopted by theBoard of Directors: June 26, 2001
Page | 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,

LTD. and HUAWEI 

TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00533-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00534-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00535-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00536-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00537-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00538-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00539-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00540-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00541-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00542-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00543-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00544-ADA

JOINT MOTION TO ENTER SCHEDULING ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s Order to meet and confer in advance of the Rule 16 case 

management conference and the Court’s Order Governing Proceedings (“OGP”), the Parties have 

conferred on a proposed scheduling order and have exchanged competing scheduling orders. The 

Parties have reached an agreement concerning the Scheduling Order, which is attached as Exhibit 

A. The Parties respectfully request entry of Exhibit A submitted herewith, and Exhibits C and D 

from Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-0053-ADA, Dkt. No. 29, for all the above-referenced cases.

Case 6:20-cv-00542-ADA Document 32 Filed 11/04/20 Page 1 of 3
Page | 2

DATED: November 4, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ James L. Etheridge 

James L. Etheridge

Texas Bar No. 24059147

Ryan S. Loveless

Texas Bar No. 24036997

Brett A. Mangrum

Texas Bar No. 24065671

Travis L. Richins

Texas Bar No. 24061296

Jeff Huang

Etheridge Law Group

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120/324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Tel.: (817) 470-7249 

Fax: (817) 887-5950 

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Jeff@EtheridgeLaw.com

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

/s/ Jason W. Cook 

Jason W. Cook

Texas Bar No. 24028537

Shaun W. Hassett

Texas Bar No. 24074372

MCGUIREWOODS LLP

2000 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1400

Dallas, TX 75201

Telephone: (214) 932-6400

jcook@mcguirewoods.com

shassett@mcguirewoods.com

Tyler T. VanHoutan

Case 6:20-cv-00542-ADA Document 32 Filed 11/04/20 Page 2 of 3
Page | 3

Texas Bar No. 24033290

MCGUIREWOODS LLP

600 Travis St., Suite 7500

Houston, TX 77002

Telephone: (713) 571-9191

tvanhoutan@mcguirewoods.com

J. Mark Mann

Texas Bar No. 12926150

G. Blake Thompson

Texas Bar No. 24042033

MANN | TINDEL | THOMPSON

300 West Main Street

Henderson, Texas 75652

Telephone: (903) 657-8540

mark@themannfirm.com

blake@themannfirm.com

Counsel for Defendants Huawei Technologies Co.,

Ltd., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., Huawei

Device Co. Ltd. (f/k/a Huawei Device (Dongguan)

Co.), Huawei Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (f/k/a

Huawei Device Co. Ltd.) and Huawei Device USA

Case 6:20-cv-00542-ADA Document 32 Filed 11/04/20 Page 3 of 3
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D . C . ^^P'RTMEN TO F •^•lomRWlO N -"• [0?ER/^!0N 3


### : \'. r - 8 P2

- O U

Motio no f AMERICANEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . fo r confidentia l treatmen t unde r Rul e 1 2 (Form

41 , Schedul e B-7 ) DOT-OST-1995-56 9

MOTIO NO F AMERICANEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . FO RCONFIDENTIA L TREATMEN T UNDE RRUL E 1 2 Communication s wit hrespec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t to ; DANIE L P . CARTO N Presiden t America nEagl e Airlines , Inc . P.O . Bo x619616 , M D 549 4 DF WAirport , Texa s 7526 1 KATHLEE NSOLE D Vic e Presiden t & Genera l Counse l America nEagl e Airlines , Inc . P.O . Bo x619616 , M D 549 4 DF WAirport , Texa s 7526 1 (817 ) 967-157 4 kate.soled@aa.co m CAR L B . NELSO N Associat e Genera l Counse l America nAirlines , Inc . 110 1 17t hStreet , N.W . Suit e 60 0 Washington , D.C . 2003 6 (202 ) 496-564 7 carl . nelson(aa a . co m

Novembe r 10 , 201 0BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D . C .

Motio no f AMERICANEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . fo r confidentia l treatmen t unde r Rul e 1 2 (Form41 , Schedul e B-7 ) DOT-OST-1995-56 9

MOTIO NO F AMERICANEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . FO RCONFIDENTIA L TREATMEN T UNDE RRUL E 1 2 America nEagl e Airlines , Inc. , unde r 1 4 CF R302.12 , herebymove s tha t th e enclose d For m41 , Schedul e B- 7 fo r 3Q1 0 b e accorde d confidentia l treatmen t and b e withhel d fro mpubli c disclosure . Th e informatio nfo r whic hconfidentia l treatmen t i s requeste d pertain s t o America nEagle' s airframe s an d air

craf t engin e acquisition s and retirements . A s provide d i nRul e 12 , thi s informatio ni s i na seale d envelop e marke d "Confi

dentia l Treatmen t Requeste d Unde r Rul e 12. "2 -
OnJun e 5 , 1995 , bylette r o f Jame s W . Mitchell , Director , Offic e o f Airlin e Statistics , th e Departmen t grante d confidentia l treatmen t fo r a 10-yea r perio d t o simila r dat a file d byAmerica nAirlines , Inc . Fo r th e reason s state d i nMr . Mitchell' s letter , th e Departmen t shoul d als o gran t confiden

tia l treatmen t fo r 1 0 year s t o 7\merica nEagle' s data . WHEREFORE , America nEagl e move s tha t th e schedule s submitte d unde r sea l wit hthi s motio nb e withhel d fro mpubli c disclosur e unde r Rul e 1 2 fo r a perio d o f 1 0 years . Respectfull ysubmitted .

Novembe r 10 , 201 0 CAR L B . NELSO N Associat e Genera l Counse l America nAirlines , Inc . O nbehal f o f America nEagl e Airlines , Inc .
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-4350

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus ROBERT EDWARD WILLIAMS, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CR-04-70001) Submitted: November 2, 2005 Decided: November 15, 2005 Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph A. Sanzone, SANZONE & BAKER, P.C., Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Jennie L. M.Waering, Assistant United States Attorney, Sarah J. Beatty, ThirdYear Practice Law Student, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The sentence was imposed after the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), and the district court properly applied the Sentencing Guidelines in an advisory manner. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert Edward Williams, Jr., appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for altering money orders in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 500, 2 (2000); forging securities in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 513(a), 2 (2000); credit card fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1029(a), 2 (2000); mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 2 (2000); and conspiracy to commit mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2000). Williams was sentenced to fifty-one months of imprisonment and ordered to pay $82,833.55 in restitution. *Williams alleges that the district court erred in including a debt of $17,687.71 on a First USA credit card in the calculation of the amount of loss under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2B1.1 (2004) because the evidence was insufficient to support a finding of fraud as to that amount. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. In fraud cases, the Government bears the burden of proving the amount of loss for sentencing purposes by a preponderance of evidence. United States v. Pierce , 409 F.3d 228, 234 (4th Cir. 2005). With respect to sentencing, the district court makes a “reasonable estimate of the loss, given the available information.” United States v. Miller , 316 F.3d 495, 503 (4th Cir. 2003). Here, the Government met its burden by introducing- 3 - documentary evidence regarding the amount of loss from First USA, and establishing through testimonial evidence the connection between the losses sustained and Williams’s use of the credit card at issue. The district court fairly relied on this information in its assessment of the loss amount. We therefore find that a preponderance of evidence supports the Government’s allegation regarding the amount of loss, and that the district court did not make an unreasonable estimate of the loss. We affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED