alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 28, 2019

No. 04-19-00267-CR

John Marshall LEE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 2nd 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 00-0495-CR

Honorable Gus J. Strauss, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s record, which was filed in this appeal on April 29, 2019, does not contain a 

trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal, pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 

On May 3, 2019, we ordered that the trial court cause the trial court clerk to file a supplemental 

clerk’s record containing a certification by May 23, 2019. On May 23, 2019, the trial court clerk 

notified this court that the supplemental clerk’s record will be late due to appellant’s attorney’s

failure to file a trial court certification of the defendant’s right to appeal. The trial court clerk 

noted that appellant’s attorney indicated that the trial court certification will be signed and filed 

soon. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant’s attorney provide the trial court clerk with a 

signed trial court certification of the defendant’s right to appeal within twenty days from the date 

of this order. It is further ORDERED that the trial court cause the trial court clerk to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing a trial court certification within ten days from the date the 

trial court clerk receives the signed trial court certification of the defendant’s right to appeal.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of May, 2019.
___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 31.b
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Roger U. Wellington, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The L.S. Starrett
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
(b) [Intentionally Omitted]
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial report;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors;

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date:  February 6, 2004                /s/  Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
                                        Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
                                        Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. 

LTD., ET AL.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00533-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00534-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00535-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00536-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00537-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00538-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00539-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00540-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00541-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00542-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00543-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00544-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00889-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00891-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00892-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00893-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00916-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00917-ADA

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and 

Development (“WSOU”) and Defendants Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Technologies 

USA, Inc., Huawei Device Co. Ltd. (f/k/a Huawei Device (Dongguan) Co.), Huawei Device 

(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (f/k/a Huawei Device Co. Ltd.) and Huawei Device USA.’s (together 

“Huawei”) Joint Notice of Settlement and Motion to Stay all Deadlines. 

Having fully considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be 

GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that all unreached case deadlines for the litigations 

referenced above are hereby stayed until October 21, 2021 to allow the parties to finalize and 

execute a formal settlement agreement, and to submit appropriate dismissal papers.

SO ORDERED.

Case 6:20-cv-00533-ADA Document 70-1 Filed 09/21/21 Page 1 of 1
SERVED: OCTOBER 31, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

... _f -=-.-:.-

In The Matter Of: 

PROTHERAGEN, INC. 

DIB/ A ALF A CHEMISTRY COMPANY 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0406 

Case No. 2013NE700150 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On September 30, 2014, an Order Granting Continuance of the Rule 16 Litigation 

Scheduling Conference was filed. This Order noted that the parties had reached a settlement 

agreement in principle, but needed time to accomplish certain provisions of the agreement. 

On October 31, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Withdrawal of Appeal & Complaint. 

After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, 

statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

.··.! 

~- o· 

1. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, set for November 14, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. 

Eastern time, is cancelled. 

2. The November 7, 2014 deadline for the parties to submit a Rule 26(f) Proposed 

Scheduling and Discovery Plan is cancelled. 

3. Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn its Request for Hearing, 

the FAA has withdrawn its Complaint, and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Mr. R. Bennett Sargent 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

12 New England Executive Park 

Burlington, MA 01803 

TEL: 781-238-7058 

FAX: 781-238-7055 

Ms. Linda Thompson 

ONE COPY 

Protheragen, Inc. d/b/a Alfa Chemistry, Respondent 

1360 Stony Brook Road 

Stony Brook, NY 11790 

TEL: 201-478-8534 

FAX: 516-927-0118 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0406 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence A venue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
CHAMNESS	SURVEYING,	INC									

588	SOUTH,	CR	600	WEST	•	ROCKPORT,	INDIANA	47635	•	812-499-4470

December 15, 2015 

Petition for exemption/rulemaking 

As a land surveyor I wish to offer aerial photography from a UAV/drone for a fee. This would in most 

all circumstances be located in rural areas on clients property. As a land surveyor I deal with the public 

on a daily basis and am very sensitive to respect the privacy of not only my clients but also to 

adjoining property owners. I respectfully request this exemption in order that I may offer this service 

to the public. 

Thank You 

Mark Chamness
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC,

 Plaintiff 

-vMICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

 Defendant 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

W-20-CV-00454-ADA 

W-20-CV-00461-ADA 

W-20-CV-00465-ADA 

ORDER TO PAY TECHNICAL ADVISOR 

The Court previously appointed Dr. Joshua J. Yi to serve as a technical advisor on this 

case. The Court has reviewed Dr. Yi’s invoice for services through March 16, 2021 and finds the 

requested amount ($26,370.36) to be reasonable and necessary. As such, the Court ORDERS

payment to be promptly made as follows: 

Plaintiffs: $13,185.18 

Defendant: $13,185.18 

Dr. Yi will separately provide deposit instructions. 

SIGNED this 17th day of March, 2021. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 61 Filed 03/17/21 Page 1 of 1
### Team5, LLC. 16303 Waterman Drive Van Nuys, California 91406 Tel: +1 818.925.1500 Fax: +1 818.925.1501 www.team5.rentals



## February 3, 2016 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Managment System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 

### Re. Petition To Amend FAA Exemption No. 11158 (the “Exemption”)

Dear Sir or Madam: Team5, LLC, hereby requests approval to amend the Exemption to permit Team5 to operate additional models of UAS - the Shotover U1, the DJI Inspire, and the DJI Phantom. The FAA has previously authorized use of the DJI Inspire for commercial purposes on multiple occasions ( e.g. , Exemption Nos. 11318,11447,11458,11461, and 11463). The additional models will be operated in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption that Team5, LLC has been issued. On February 2, 2015, the FAA issued the Exemption to Team5, LLC to utilize the DJI S1000 and Gryphon Dynamics X8 UAS for motion picture and television filming. Team5’s amended Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) is being submitted separately pursuant to 14 CFR §11.35(b). Section 6 (pages 1-13) of the FOPM contains the proposed amendment. Team5, LLC also request approval of the addition and description of the UAS Technician in Section 3. The purpose is merely to elaborate on our crew member requirements and responsibilities. Section 3 (pages 1-7) of the FOPM contains the proposed amendment. All UAS operations will continue to fully adhere to the conditions of the Exemption and all operations will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption. Thank you for your consideration of our request. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 818.925.1500 Sincerely yours,

Kevin LaRosa II Chief Pilot and Manager of UAS Operations Team5, LLC
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


September 14, 2021


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2088


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, NY 10286


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2088 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined the Registration
Statement File No. 333-257063 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references
to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	 /s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3443] 

# AGENCY:

Department of State. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “The Majesty of Spain Exhibition: Royal Collections from the Museo del Prado & Patrimonio Nacional” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with a foreign lender. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Mississippi Arts Pavilion, Jackson, Mississippi, from March 1, 2001, through September 3, 2001, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Jacqueline Caldwell, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-6982). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: October 8, 2000. 

William B. Bader, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 00-26497 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-U
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5642 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5642

   To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing Fenazaquin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

  Mr. Gosar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing Fenazaquin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING FENAZAQUIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Mixtures            Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          containing 4-[2-                                                  12/31/2015
                          (4-tert-
                          Butylphenyl)ethox
                          y]quinazoline
                          (Fenazaquin) (CAS
                          No. 120928-09-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3808.91.25)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of St. Joseph, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth L. Johnson, as
Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o
            (d)); and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  March 31, 2006                           /s/ Kenneth L. Johnson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Name:  Kenneth L. Johnson
                                                Title: Treasurer and Principal
                                                       Financial Officer
#### CAMPBELL v. STATE.

No. 22653.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 8, 1943.

C. C. McKinney, of Cooper, for appellant.

*175Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of possessing intoxicating liquor in a dry area for the purpose of salé, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100, from which judgment he has appealed to this court.

Quite a number of complaints are brought forward for review. However, in view of the disposition we are making of the appeal, it will not be necessary to discuss all of them.

Appellant’s first contention is that the evidence is wholly insufficient to sustain his conviction. With this contention we are in accord. The record shows that on or about the 23rd day of October, 1942, the sheriff of Hopkins County, accompanied by two of his deputies, armed with a search warrant, went to the home of the appellant and searched the same for intoxicating liquor. As a result of the search they found a jug containing a gallon of wine which, according to the testimony of the. State’s chemist, contained twenty-two per cent of alcohol by volume.

The State also introduced in evidence the minutes of the Commissioners’ Court showing that on the 20th day of September, 1901, the court convened in special session for the purpose of canvassing the result of the election held within and for said county on September 7, 1901, to determine whether or not the sale of intoxicating liquor should be prohibited within said county. The canvass of the returns disclosed that 2,776 votes were cast for prohibition and 1,660 votes against it, whereupon the court declared the result of said election to be for prohibition and ordered that the sale of intoxicating liquor within and for said county be prohibited; but the State wholly failed to show that the county judge of said county ever published his proclamation putting the law in effect. This being a local law, the Commissioners’ Court was required to comply with every statutory requirement to put prohibition in effect. In support of what we have said, we refer to the following cases: Watson v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 632, 122 S.W.2d 311; Humphreys v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 383, 99 S.W.2d 600; Green v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 552, 101 S.W.2d 241; Dixon v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 221, 115 S.W.2d 414.

Many objections were addressed to the court’s charge, some of which are well founded because the charge is too restrictive.

For the error herein pointed outi, iihe judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                       EXHIBIT A

                      STARRETT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                EXHIBIT SETTING FORTH THE COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY
                         EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION
                     (In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                              1997        1996
                                                             ------       -----

<S>                                                          <C>          <C>   
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
 during the period ....................................        6,261       6,261
                                                             =======      ======

Net Income ............................................      $ 2,292      $4,046
                                                             =======      ======

Primary earnings per share:

     Net Income .......................................      $   .37      $  .65
                                                             =======      ======
</TABLE>


                                       16