alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Charles A. Hinrichs, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Charles A. Hinrichs                           |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Charles A. Hinrichs                               |   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| May 7, 2008                                  |   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided toSmurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained bySmurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     Exhibit 11

                       STERLING BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Three Months Ended
                                                                      March 31,
                                                                 -------------------
                                                               2000               1999
                                                            ----------         ----------
<S>                                                        <C>                <C>
Net income                                                 $ 3,878,559        $ 3,464,622
Less: preferred dividends                                       20,987             16,632
                                                            ----------         ----------
NET INCOME AVAILABLE FOR COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
            AND ADJUSTED FOR DILUTED COMPUTATION           $ 3,857,572        $ 3,447,990
                                                           ===========        ===========



WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING                   8,356,065          8,585,237
Add dilutive effect of:
            Stock options                                       80,135            145,708
            Convertible preferred stock                        241,883            243,929
                                                            ----------         ----------
ADJUSTED FOR ASSUMED DILUTED COMPUTATION                     8,678,083          8,974,874
                                                            ==========         ==========

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE                                         $0.46              $0.40
                                                                 =====              =====
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                                       $0.44              $0.38
                                                                 =====              =====
</TABLE>

                                       26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,734
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                       269
<INVENTORY>                                     71,864
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,957
<PP&E>                                         100,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 393,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,377
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,400
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                      (5,541)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   393,660
<SALES>                                        108,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,334
<CGS>                                           80,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (82)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,321)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,677)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,677)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5729 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5729

To amend the Small Business Act to permit Native Hawaiian Organizations 
   to have status as HUBZone small business concerns, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2012

 Ms. Hanabusa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Small Business Act to permit Native Hawaiian Organizations 
   to have status as HUBZone small business concerns, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Native Hawaiian HUBZone Opportunity 
Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. IN GENERAL.

    (a) Eligibility for Status.--Section 3(p)(3) of the Small Business 
Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(3)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following:
                    ``(F) a small business concern--
                            ``(i) that is wholly owned by one or more 
                        Native Hawaiian organizations (as such term is 
                        defined in section 8(a)(15)), or by a 
                        corporation that is wholly owned by one or more 
                        Native Hawaiian organizations; or
                            ``(ii) that is owned in part by one or more 
                        Native Hawaiian organizations, or by a 
                        corporation that is wholly owned by one or more 
                        Native Hawaiian organizations, if all other 
                        owners are either United States citizens or 
                        small business concerns;''.
    (b) Regulatory Authority.--Not later than the date that is 1 year 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small 
Business Administration shall make rules to carry out the amendments 
made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5464 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5464

 To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)-3-
              [2-(dimethylcarbamoyl) phenylsufamoyl]urea.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Price of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)-3-
              [2-(dimethylcarbamoyl) phenylsufamoyl]urea.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-(4,6-DIMETHOXYPYRIMIDIN-2-YL)-3-[2-(DIMETHYLCARBAMOYL) 
              PHENYLSUFAMOYL]UREA.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         1-(4,6-            Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          dimethoxypyrimidi                                                 12/31/2015
                          n-2-yl)-3-[2-
                          (dimethylcarbamoy
                          l)
                          phenylsufamoyl]ur
                          ea (CAS No.
                          213464-778)
                          (provided for in
                          subhead
                          3808.93.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Form 10-QSB of Worldwide Biotech & Pharmaceutical
      Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Wenxia Guo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








**/s/
      Wenxia Guo**


Wenxia
      Guo


Chief
      Executive Officer




November
      19, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



                                               Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Stephan Co. (the
"Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David Spiegel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the company.

/s/ David Spiegel
__________________________________
David Spiegel
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5530 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain woven fabrics of synthetic 

staple fibers, containing 85 percent or more by weight of polyester 

staple fibers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. YOUNG of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain woven 

fabrics of synthetic staple fibers, containing 85 percent 

or more by weight of polyester staple fibers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF SYNTHETIC STA4 PLE FIBERS, CONTAINING 85 PERCENT OR 

5 MORE BY WEIGHT OF POLYESTER STAPLE FI6 BERS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5530 IH

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Certain woven fabrics of 

synthetic staple fibers, containing 85 percent or more 

by weight of polyester staple fibers (provided for in 

subheading 5512.19.00 ) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

5 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### SANDLICK COAL CO. et al. v. HUGHES.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 4, 1951.

*259Mahan, Davis & Mahan and Armer H. Mahan, all of Louisville, P. H. Hyden, Pikeville, for appellants.

Napier & Napier, Hazard, for appellee.

CLAY, Commissioner.

In this Workmen’s Compensation case the only issue raised by the appellant employer is whether or not the lower Court had jurisdiction of the appeal from the Workmen’s Compensation Board, because it was not filed within 20 days after the rendition of the Board’s order. Appellee cross-appeals and asks us to consider a former judgment involving the same controversy.

In April 1948 the Workmen’s Compensation Board made an award. The following May appellee moved to re-open the case, which was overruled. Thereafter on appeal to the Letcher Circuit Court, in January 1949, a judgment was entered dismissing the petition for review.

Without appealing from that judgment, appellee renewed his motion to re-open before the Board. On August 16, 1949 the Board overruled the motion. On September 6 appellee filed his petition to review this last order in the Circuit Court. Appellant generally demurred to the petition. The Circuit Court (apparently without passing on the demurrer) sustained the petition for review and remanded the case to the Board with directions to re-open it.

KRS 342.285 gives a party twenty days within which to appeal from an order of the Board. We have consistently held that the Circuit Court does not acquire jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal not taken within the prescribed time. Department of Highways v. Matney, 290 Ky. 440, 161 S.W.2d 617, and cases cited therein.

Appellee points out that the twentieth day fell on Sunday, September 4, 1949, and that the following day was Labor Day. He argues that he was entitled to a full twenty days within which to file his appeal, and since he could not do so on the twentieth or twenty-first day because they were a Sunday and a holiday respectively, he should be allowed twenty-two days. This question has been decided adversely to ap-pellee in Shaver v. Sparks, 277 Ky. 581, 126 S.W.2d 1110, and the cases cited therein.

Appellee insists KRS 446.030(2) is applicable. It provides: “If any proceeding is directed by law to take place, or any act is directed to be done, on a particular day of a month and that day is Sunday, the proceeding shall take place, or the act *260shall be done, on the next day that is not a legal holiday.”

This statute would not affect the appeal time limit because no proceeding or act was directed to take place or be done on a particular day.

Appellee attempts to cross-appeal from a former judgment of the Letcher Circuit Court, which of course we cannot consider on this record.

We conclude the lower Court erroneously entertained the petition for review.

The judgment is reversed.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1096 KA 12-01463**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

JAMES F. O’DELL, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA, THE ABBATOY LAW FIRM, PLLC, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (ROBERT C. JEFFRIES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J.), rendered August 24, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of marihuana in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: November 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick J. Moore,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Patrick J. Moore                                    |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Patrick J. Moore  Chief Executive Officer  May 10, 2007 |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. and will beretained by Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

***Certificationpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

***(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)***

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of American States Water Company andGolden State Water Company (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I Robert J. Sprowls, Chief Financial Officerof the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| /s/  Robert J. Sprowls                                                              |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                |   |
| Robert  J. Sprowls                                                                  |   |
| Executive  Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |
|                                                                                |   |
| Date: May 9, 2008                                                              |   |

 

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133515 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

CHASE EQUIPMENT LEASING, INC.,

Successor in interest to National Bank of 

Detroit, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133515 

 COA: 272281 

Ct of Claims: 04-000238-MT 

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 13, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 25, 2011

p0718 

# Order

July 25, 2011

142733

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142733 COA: 295366 St Clair CC: 08-001985-FH GARY LAVERNE KAUFMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 13, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.