alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION 8
 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

DENVER, CO 80202-1129 

Phone 800-227-8917 

http://www.epa.gov/region08 

October 7, 2010 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT:	 Revised Modeling Files from the State of Colorado for the Attainment Demonstration 

for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard and Related Revisions 

FROM:	 Mark Komp, Colorado State Coordinator 1I-tdc~~

TO:	 Docket Number: EPA - R08-0AR-2010-0285 

Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment has submitted to EPA Region revised 

modeling files pertaining to the Attainment Demonstration for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard and 

Related Revisions for the Denver Metro Area and Northern Front Range (DMA/NFR). The results of 

the modeling and the modeling files have been placed in docket number EPA-R08-2010-0285. 

On October 7, 2010, Colorado submitted revised photochemical modeling results to EPA 

Region 8's Air Program and radiation Division for the DMA/NFR ozone SIP. Colorado re-ran the 

photochemical model because in September 2010 the State discovered that errors had been made in 

specifying the location of certain point sources in the 2008 modeling. Latitude/longitude locations for 

some point sources in the original modeling effort were mistakenly derived using the degree-minutesecond coordinate system rather than the correct decimal degree coordinate system. As a result, some 

point source locations were displaced in the grid-coordinate system used by the model. Thus, 

Colorado re-ran the model with the correct coordinates to determine whether the errors made in 

locating some point sources affected the reliability of the model results. 

The modeling and the modeling results were placed on portable 1 terabyte hard drive labeled 

"Denver SIP CAMX Updated LatiLon Windows FAT-32 File System". The hard drive was filed as 

part of docket number EPA-R08-201 0-0285. 

*Pn'nted on Recycled Paper
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN S. HASKELL, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-690

)

UNNI HASKELL, PCP GROUP, LLC, )

FLORIDA INVESTMENT TRUST )

ENTERPRISES, LLC, MATERIAL )

CONNECTION FLORIDA, INC., and )

HASKELL TEXTILES CORP., INC, )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed November 21, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Amy M. Williams, Judge.

Nicole Deese Newlon, William P. Cassidy, 

Jr., and John E. Johnson of Johnson & 

Cassidy, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Richard C. Alvarez, and Eric R. Maier, of 

Older Lundy & Alvarez, Tampa, for 

Appellee Unni Haskell.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
steam

_ record - Re: Questionaire for Steam Electric Power Generatin g Effluent Guidelines:Extension Request

Greetings,
This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an ex tension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agre es to the extension and establishes a new date.
Sincerely,

-----"Hoang, Boi V" <HoangBV@gru.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Hoang, Boi V" <HoangBV@gru.com> Date: 07/01/2010 12:10PM cc: "Klemans, Robert W" <KLEMANSRW@gru.co m>, "Regan, Edward J" <REGANEJ@gru.com> Subject: Questionaire for Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines:Extension Request From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Hoan g , Boi V" <Hoan g BV @g ru.com> Date: 7/2/2010 7:52 PM Sub j ect: Re: Questionaire for Steam Electric Power Generatin g Effluent Guidelines:Extension Request Pa g e 1 of 2

4/25/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C2E4395DO

...Dear Ms. Alicea,

The City of Gainesville, Gainesville Regional Utilities, has studied th e USEPA’s Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guid elines sent to our power generating stations, JR Kelly (Plant ID 4211) and Deerhaven (Plant ID 2623). Due to the volume of quest ions requiring extensive data collection, calculations, competing projects and timelines, we request an extens ion of 180 days. Please advise if this request is approved.

Thank you in advance for your consideration.

Sincerely,



### Boi Hoang

Utility Design Engineer
Strategic Planning

Gainesville Regional Utilities (GRU)

P.O. Box 147117

A136

Gainesville , FL 32614-7117

Phone: 352-393-1304

Fax: 352-334-3151 Pa g e 2 of 2

4/25/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C2E4395DO

...
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

For the following periods the registrant had no securities which were dilutive
for the calculation of earnings per share.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Weighted average number of basic
Summary from year-end audited         Basic and diluted loss per common   and diluted common stock shares
financial statements                  share                               outstanding
------------------------------        ---------------------------------   --------------------------------
<S>                                   <C>                                 <C>
Three months ended 8/31/2000          (0.04)                              12,231,494

Three  months ended 8/31/1999         (0.01)                              10,040,000
</TABLE>
#### Bruce MOYE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27152.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 10, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

■ The conviction is for a violation of the liquor law in Navarro County. The pen-, alty assessed is a fine of $150 and confinement in the county jail for ten days.

*527All matters of procedure appear regular. The record is 'before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence thereof nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1784 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 53 ) ll-B-1 2 Docket Number: 

# A-84-4 4

Printed 10/31/2008 8:05:40 AM Sheet 53 of 143P. 2

Date : Augus t

8 , 198 6

MEMORANDU M TO : Docke t A-84-4 4 FROM : Wm . Larr yElmore , P.E . Industria l Studie s Branc h SUBJECT : SO 2 Emissio n Calculation s Th e attache d informatio n wa s develope d b yNanc yMcLaughlin , EPA:ISB , t o comput e SO 2 emission s fro mrefiner yfue l ga s and potentia l reduction s b ylowerin g th e NSPS . Thi s i s th e procedur e use d t o deriv e th e SO 2 emissio n number s tha t ar e presente d i n th e revie wdocument .P. 3



# ^Jc u A? cW/ ^ A?4O ^ W4A/

V ike q [

fl/nic/i 

### frcr. kf - ? Shlkr



# Jk g-oO V 

### /•Wf 

# ? - ? p •/*?/' / ?g< ; Jy^J^r 

# ^fXfc -h

/trYl r/& 

# i _ tkrriUit*/ 

# SJL r^

i > 

### 'he- removal

effec t yJ

\ 7 ^ 5/?^ fA l ff/

^. / •?£•£/£te.'f&rdbi £!±L 

### fyD z 

### ^^ i * l/flgd'c / ^ M <>// £W^lmK

rJgyj V S M ife^cy Wi AA o .^/j/f r5 

# 7 /A V y/y Q r^A M y l {oWy^r ) V
r - /J- i Ttnmt^o I 

# ^ ) ^ fc

o & / ^ fe;> ^" 6 

# ^ yv 

# A%*ii2)

' M3& A

*

# z C D J ^ 3>,2£ Q 

### $Z?it> 

## is/ , P J^

_ £g?6 6 £ 7 ^ P. 4 ^ 

# ftLcV AVUJ^ s /^Wj U



# ? M^ ; 

# pu 4 s ^ ^O T£/*&*/fro KtcLcyi'oyS 

## hy^/ ) (it/A?/

) 5,0 ? h 

## ^jj/yr ) ^ X 

# -IIM : s ^ l !E,l( p 

## /

o ? 0 

# <#te
Exhibit 32(2)



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of 7-Eleven, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward W. Moneypenny, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, , pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    EDWARD W.
MONEYPENNYEdward W. Moneypenny Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 7-Eleven, Inc.




Tab 5
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Charles A. Hinrichs, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Charles A. Hinrichs                    |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Charles  A. Hinrichs                        |
| Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
| November  8, 2004                           |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. and will beretained by Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


EXHIBIT 32.1

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Downside Up, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10K-SB for the period ending April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Michael J. Cavaleri,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

______/s/______________
Michael J. Cavaleri
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0340[1]

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:44PM -----

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: <Sarah.Merrill@CH2M.com> 

Date: 10/19/2009 12:24PM 

cc: <scheng@ebmud.com>, <Jim.Sandoval@CH2M.com>, <Jacqueline.Kepke@CH2M.com> 

Subject: RE: NESHAP Comments (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708)

Hello Ms. King,

I am submitting the BACWA AIR Committee response to your questions, as listed below, on behalf of 

the Committee Chair, Stephanie Cheng.

Please see the attached letter and attachments.

Thank you again for this opportunity to comment on the proposed NESHAP for RICE.

Our committee looks forward to further discussion with the EPA on this topic.

Regards,

Sarah Merrill 

Staff Engineer 

CH2M HILL

Tel: (408)436-4936 x37437

-----Original Message----- 

From: King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 8:18 AM 

To: Cheng, Stephanie 

Cc: Jim.Sandoval@CH2M.com; rschmidt@centralsan.dst.ca.us 

Subject: Re: NESHAP Comments (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708) 

Hi, 

Thank you for your comments on the proposed rule. I have a few 

questions: 

1) Do your member agencies have any stack test data from their engines 

that they would be willing to share with EPA? In order to change the 

emission limit from what was proposed, we really need additional 

emissions data that supports the comments that the limit is not 

achievable. 

2) Are the engines that are operated by your members located at a major 

source of HAP emissions or an area source of HAP emissions? A major 

source is a plant site that emits >10 tons/year of a single HAP or >25 

tons/year of combined HAPs. Anything that is not a major source is an 

area source. 

3) We are exploring the possibility of requiring work practice standards 

rather than an emission limitation for these engines. Can you provide 

any information on work/operational practices that are used for these 

engines in order to minimize emissions? 

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Page 1
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0340[1]

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov 

|------------> 

From: Cheng, Stephanie" <scheng@ebmud.com> 

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 08/19/2009 04:52 PM 

Subject: NESHAP Comments (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708) 

Dear Melanie - 

Please find attached a letter on behalf of the Air Issues and 

Regulations Committee of the Bay Area Clean Water Agencies regarding the 

proposed national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for 

stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines. If you have any 

questions on the content of the letter, please feel free to contact me. 

Stephanie Cheng, P.E.| Resource Recovery Program | East Bay Municipal 

Utility District | phone 510.287.1337 | fax 510.287.0621 

[attachment "AIR Letter - NESHAP RICE (2009-08-19).pdf" deleted by 

Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US] 

Page 2
3851552-1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

BRYNNE SOUKUP § 

Plaintiff § 

§ 

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-648-RP 

§ 

FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. and § 

FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS, LLC § 

Defendants § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

ORDER

Considering the foregoing Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to File a 

Responsive Pleading filed by Defendant, Flight Services & Systems, LLC; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant, Flight Services & Systems, LLC, is hereby 

granted an additional 30 days, or until October 7, 2020, within which to file pleadings responsive 

to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand. 

Austin, Texas, this ______ day of __________________________, 2020. 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 13-1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 1 of 1
Order entered February 26, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00029
- CR
EX PARTE FRANK DELVI S MAY, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. 003
- 2371
- 2012



### O RDER Appellant’s February 20, 2013 motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief is
GRANTED to the extent of the following relief. The Court has received information that the court reporter has undergone medical

tr eatment and will need an extension of time to prepare the reporter’s record. We EXTEND the time to file the reporter’s record to April 25, 2013 . Appellant’s brief shall be due by May 24,
2013

. The State’s brief shall be due by June 24, 2013 . If any par ty does not file its brief by the date specified, the appeal will be submitted without that party’s brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 31.1. The appeal is REMOVED from its current submission date of April 1, 2013 . The appeal
will be submitted without oral argume nt on August 1, 2013 before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Evans. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 31.2.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Denise

Condran, official court reporter, County Court at Law No. 3, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1



                                                                       EXHIBIT B
                      STARRETT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                EXHIBIT SETTING FORTH THE COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY
                         EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION
                     (In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                        SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                    ---------------------
                                                      1996         1995
                                                    --------      -------
<S>                                                 <C>            <C>   


Weighted average number of shares outstanding
 during the period ..........................          6,261        6,261
                                                    ========       ======





Net Income ..................................       $  1,512       $1,796
                                                    ========       ======





Primary earnings per share:

     Net Income .............................       $    .25       $  .28
                                                    ========       ======
</TABLE>


                                       14
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6476

MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

HUTTONSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER; WILLIAM S.

HAINES, Warden; JAMES T. PARKER, Administrator, Huntington Work Release Center; PAUL

KIRBY, Commissioner, Division of Corrections,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior

District Judge. (CA-00-15-2)

Submitted: October 17, 2001 Decided: December 12, 2001

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2001), pursuant to Williams’ request for voluntary dismissal. A Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) voluntary dismissal

without prejudice is not appealable. Unioil, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton

& Co., 809 F.2d 548, 555 (9th Cir. 1986). We accordingly deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss Williams’ appeal of this

nonappealable order. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cytation Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard Fisher, Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard
Fisher                            Richard
FisherChairman of the Board and Chief Financial Officer

January 5, 2006
#### Alvin W. Fenzel, Individually and as Executor of Florence J. Fenzel, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v St. Francis Hospital et al., Defendants, and Robert M. Barone, Appellant.

Order affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Gossel, J.

All concur, except Boomer and Pine, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse, in the following memorandum.

Boomer and Pine, JJ.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. The court erred in denying defendant Dr. Barone’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against him for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The cause of action stemmed from Dr. Barone’s allegedly false statements to plaintiffs, who are the husband and children of the decedent, and his failure to disclose allegedly relevant information to them. In August 1986, defendant Dr. Sperazza had *824performed a hysterectomy on decedent. During subsequent surgery on decedent in December 1986, Dr. Barone found a laparotomy pad inside decedent’s small bowel. Dr. Barone told decedent’s family that, based on his findings, it appeared that decedent had swallowed the cause of the obstruction. Plaintiffs alleged that Dr. Barone failed to inform them that the object found was a laparotomy pad, that such pads are used during hysterectomies and that they measure 15 by 15 inches, and that he told them, in order to protect Dr. Sperazza, that decedent had swallowed the material. Dr. Barone moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs’ allegations did not rise to the level of intentional infliction of emotional distress. In opposition, plaintiffs submitted the affidavit of Dr. Thomas Kerenyi, who stated "with medical certainty” that the laparotomy pad had been left in decedent during the hysterectomy, that decedent had not swallowed it, and that Dr. Barone’s attempt to place the responsibility on the decedent is outrageous and inexcusable.

Plaintiffs do not allege that Dr. Barone is chargeable with medical malpractice. We find that the conduct with which he is charged does not rise to the level of extreme and outrageous conduct necessary to support a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress *(see, Luciano v Handcock,*78 AD2d 943; *see generally, Freihofer v Hearst Corp.,*65 NY2d 135, 143; *Fischer v Maloney,*43 NY2d 553). Even if plaintiffs were able to prove that Dr. Barone knowingly lied to them, his conduct would not rise to the necessary level *(see, Clark v New York Tel. Co.,*52 AD2d 1030, *affd*41 NY2d 1069; *see also, Robinson v Paramount Pictures Corp.,*122 AD2d 32, 33). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J. —summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.
Exhibit
10.13


 


 Certain
information has been excluded from this agreement (indicated by blacked out wording) because such information (i) is not material (ii)
would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed.