alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HICKS v. STATE.

No. 22655.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 8, 1943.

Polk Shelton, of Austin, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Murder is the offense; the punishment, three years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### Herbert COLLINS, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 23, 1951.

J. M. Wolfinbarger, Irvine, for movant.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Estill Circuit Court convicting mov-ant of selling whiskey in Local Option Territory and imposing a fine of $100 and confinement in the County Jail for thirty days. The motion is overruled, appeal denied, and the judgment is affirmed.
Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 98 Filed 08/11/22 Page 1 of 2
Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 98 Filed 08/11/22 Page 2 of 2
#### Bonnie ENGEL, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 25807.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 2, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of a narcotic drug known as nem-butal ; the punishment assessed is a fine of $1,000, and confinement in the county jail for a term of two years.

Upon the written motion of the appellant, duly verified by her affidavit, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

Pursuant to section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on August 3, 2000, Guilford Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 6611 Tributary Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of cocaine (9041) a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule II.

The firm plans to manufacture methyl-3-beta-(4-trimethylstannylphenyl)-tropane-2-carboxylate as a final intermediate for the production of dopascan injection.

Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration.

Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than December 12, 2000.

Dated: September 26, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-26373 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26326]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Social and Political Sciences; Notice of 
Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, and amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meetings of the Advisory Panel for Social and Political 
Sciences (1761).
    Date and Time: November 15-16; 9 am to 5 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
920, Arlington, VA.
    Contact Person: Dr. Frank Scioli and Dr. Marianne Stewart, 
Program Directors for Political Science, National Science 
Foundation. Telephone: (703) 292-8762.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the political science proposals 
as a part of the selection process for awards.

    Date and Time: November 5-6; 9 am to 5 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
970, Arlington, VA.
    Contact Person: Dr. Marie Provine, Program Director, Law and 
Social Science, National Science Foundation. Telephone: (703) 292-
8762.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Law and Science Proposals as 
a part of the selection process for awards.

    Date and Time: December 11-12; 9 am to 5 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
970, Arlington, VA.
    Contact Person: Dr. Patricia White and Dr. Fred Pampel, 
Department of Sociology, National Science Foundation. Telephone: 
(703) 292-8762.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Sociology proposals as a part 
of the selection process for awards.

    Type of Meetings: Closed.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning support for research proposals submitted to the NSF for 
financial support.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 10, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-26326 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-128370 on Form S-8 of Mountain National Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated
March 3, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Mountain
National Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary as of and for the year ended December
31, 2004 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005.

/s/ Hazlett, Lewis & Bieter, PLLC

Chattanooga, Tennessee
March 30, 2006
#### Farash Construction Corporation, Appellant, v Gregory D. Ferentino & Associates, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs cause of action for fraudulent concealment *878was properly dismissed. Defendant designed and supervised the construction of an apartment complex in 1970 and 1971. The complex was sold in 1974 and again in 1975 before plaintiff purchased the property in 1977. Following a fire in 1981, plaintiff alleged that defendant architect fraudulently concealed information that the complex was not constructed in accordance with accepted engineering and architectural standards. Plaintiff, however, has failed to allege or demonstrate a contractual, fiduciary or confidential relationship giving rise to a duty upon defendant to impart such information to plaintiff or upon which liability for fraud may be imposed *(see generally,*60 NY Jur 2d, Fraud and Deceit, §§ 94-96; *see also, Ossining Union Free School Dist. v Anderson LaRocca Anderson,*135 AD2d 518). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Willis, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
EXHIBIT 7 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00505-ADA Document 53-5 Filed 04/02/21 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

APPLE INC.,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00505-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DECLARATION OF DOOYONG LEE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION 

TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE NORTHERN 

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

I, Dooyong Lee, declare as follows:

1. I am over 18 years of age and competent to make this declaration. I am 

Manager of Neonode Smartphone LLC and Chief Executive Officer of Aequitas 

Technologies LLC. My residence and primary place of work is in Seoul, Republic of 

Korea. 

2. Any paper documents pertinent to this litigation that are in my possession 

or under my control are located at my place of work in South Korea. Documents in 

electronic format are stored in one or more servers or databases and are generally 

accessible from anywhere in the United States, including the Western District of Texas, 

where there is a reliable internet connection capable of supporting a virtual private 

network.

3. I have not traveled to the Northern District of California in the past three 

years in connection with this litigation, the Asserted Patents or any product that allegedly 

practices the Asserted Patents.

DocuSign Envelope ID: C6D669BC-AC04-4E99-AE11-7120E0DE1702 Case 6:20-cv-00505-ADA Document 53-5 Filed 04/02/21 Page 2 of 3
2

4. I am willing to travel to the Western District of Texas for trial or other 

purposes as required by this litigation, at the request of either party. 

5. I declare that the foregoing is true and correct under penalty of perjury.

DATED: March __, 2021 Signed in _________, Republic of Korea by:

_________________

 Dooyong Lee

DocuSign Envelope ID: C6D669BC-AC04-4E99-AE11-7120E0DE1702

28 Seoul

Case 6:20-cv-00505-ADA Document 53-5 Filed 04/02/21 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
MARCH 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS REPORTED ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED 
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,643,311
<SECURITIES>                                13,603,700
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,416,207
<PP&E>                                         203,694
<DEPRECIATION>                                 107,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,127,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,695,802
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        611
<COMMON>                                     1,239,324
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,191,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,127,624
<SALES>                                         50,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,042,037
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,664,888)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,664,888)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,664,888)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00392-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.R.G.L., ET AL., MINOR CHILDREN

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2011-FAM-61598-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed as appellants are 

exempt from payment due to their inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 9, 2014
Deloitte & Touche LLP                                             Exhibit 2
750 College Road E.
Princeton, NJ  08540

Tel:   (609) 514-3600
Fax:  (609) 514-3603


INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

To Cendant Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about Cendant Mortgage Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002
included in the accompanying management assertion.  Management is
responsible for Cendant Mortgage Corporation's compliance with those minimum
servicing standards.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about Cendant Mortgage Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on Cendant Mortgage Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Cendant Mortgage Corporation
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

February 21, 2003


By:  /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
     -------------------------
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick J. Moore,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Patrick J. Moore    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Patrick J. Moore        |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| August 6, 2008     |   |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc.and will be retained by Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 13
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 13
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 13
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from Stone Container
Corporation and Subsidiaries' March 31, 1997 Consolidated Balance Sheet and
Consolidated Operations and Retained Earnings and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              94
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      590
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                        779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1570
<PP&E>                                            4907
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2349
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              810
<BONDS>                                           4126
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        115
<COMMON>                                           955
<OTHER-SE>                                       (416)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6234
<SALES>                                           1181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1181
<CGS>                                              988
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    14
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (57)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (97)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (97)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.99)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<LEGEND>                                       
    TRANSMITTING STV GROUP'S FISCAL 1999 SECOND QUARTER FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>                                      
<CIK> 0000095045                               
<NAME> STV GROUP, INC                          
                                                     
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                              MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                      7,053,000
<SECURITIES>                                                    2,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                              27,244,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  470,000
<INVENTORY>                                                16,447,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           50,450,000
<PP&E>                                                      6,055,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                              4,479,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             54,637,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      35,925,000
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                    2,031,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                 13,295,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               54,637,000
<SALES>                                                    67,566,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           67,566,000
<CGS>                                                      39,357,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              43,220,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            114,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             3,434,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                1,612,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         1,822,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                1,822,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.44
        
 

</TABLE>
#### HUFF v. STATE.

No. 26408.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 29, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEDCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $50.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.