61318 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 17, 2000 / Notices

negotiated placement requirements in

18 CFR 34.2.

MDU Resources also requests for this

authorization to supercede and replace

the authorizing granted in Docket Nos.

ES99–18–000 and ES99–18–001.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest such filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

in accordance with Rules 211 and 214

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

385.214). All such motions and protests

should be filed on or before October 31,

2000. Protests will be considered by the

Commission to determine the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection. This

filing may also be viewed on the

Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/

online/rims.htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–26556 Filed 10–16–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EL01–3–000]

Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.,

Complainant v. PJM Interconnection,

L.L.C., Respondent; Notice of Filing

October 11, 2000.

Take notice that on October 6, 2000,

Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.

(MSCG), tendered for filing a complaint

pursuant to Section 206 of the Federal

Power Act against PJM Interconnection,

L.L.C. (PJM) alleging that, in order to

advance the Commission’s goal of

regional uniformity and coordination

and to avoid other market problems,

PJM should eliminate (1) its bid cap by

the end of October 2000, to coincide

with the expiration of the New York and

New England bid caps and (2) eliminate

its ICAP requirement and deficiency

charge commensurate with ISO–NE’s

actions to date. Given the immediacy of

this date, MSCG requests fast track

procession of its complaint by the

Commission.

Copies of the filing were served upon

PJM and other interested parties.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest this filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

in accordance with Rules 211 and 214

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

385.214). All such motions or protests

must be filed on or before October 25,

2000. Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room. This filing may

also be viewed on the Internet a http:/

/www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call

202–208–2222) for assistance. Answers

to the complaint shall also be due on or

before October 26, 2000.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–26618 Filed 10–16–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EG01–1–000]

Quinnipiac Energy, LLC; Notice of

Application for Commission

Determination of Exempt Wholesale

Generator Status

October 10, 2000.

Take notice that on October 4, 2000,

Quinnipiac Energy, LLC (Quinnipiac),

with its address at 800 Village Walk

#324, Guilford, CT 06437, filed with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

(Commission) an application for

determination of exempt wholesale

generator status pursuant to part 365 of

the Commission’s regulations.

Quinnipiac is a Delaware limited

liability company that will be engaged

directly and exclusively in the business

of owning or operating, or both owning

and operating, all or part of one or more

eligible facilities to be located in New

Haven, Connecticut. The eligible

facilities will consist of an

approximately 75 MW oil-fired electric

generation project and related

interconnection facilities. The output of

the eligible facilities will be sold at

wholesale.

Any person desiring to be heard

concerning the application for exempt

wholesale generator status should file a

motion to intervene or comments with

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 888 First Street, NE,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

385.214). The Commission will limit its

consideration of comments to those that

concern the adequacy or accuracy of the

application. All such motions and

comments should be filed on or before

October 31, 2000, and must be served on

the applicant. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection or on the

Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/

online/rims.htm (please call (202) 208–

2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers

Secretary

[FR Doc. 00–26557 Filed 10–16–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EC00–144–000]

Reliant Energy Coolwater, LLC, et al.;

Notice of Filing

October 11, 2000.

Take notice that on September 27,

2000, Reliant Energy Coolwater, LLC,

Reliant Energy Desert Basin, LLC,

Reliant Energy Ellwood, LLC, Reliant

Energy Etiwanda, LLC, Reliant Energy

Indian River, LLC, Reliant Energy

Mandalay, LLC, Reliant Energy

Maryland Holdings, LLC, Reliant Energy

Mid-Atlantic Power Holdings, LLC,

Reliant Energy New Jersey Holdings,

LLC, Reliant Energy Ormond Beach,

LLC, Reliant Energy Osceola, LLC,

Reliant Energy Shelby County, LP,

Reliant Energy Services, Inc. and EL

Dorado Energy, LLC (collectively, the

Applicants), submitted an application

pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal

Power Act, seeking authorization for a

proposed corporate restructuring and

the resulting indirect transfer of

jurisdictional facilities, and requesting

expedited consideration and certain

waivers.

The Applicants state that, as a result

of a proposed corporate restructuring of

certain of the Applicants’ affiliates,

there will be a transfer of indirect contol

of Applicants’ jurisdictional facilities.

The Applicants further state that the

proposed corporate Restructuring will

have no effect on the jurisdictional

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 17, 2000 / Notices 61319

facilities, nor will it have any effect on

competition, rates or regulation.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest such filing a motion to intervene

or protest with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First

Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

385.214). All such motions and protests

should be filed on or before October 18,

2000. Protests will be considered by the

Commission to determine the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection. This

filing may also be viewed on the

Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/

online/rims.htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–26554 Filed 10–16–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket Nos. ER00–936–000 and ER00–936–

003; ER00–937–000 and ER00–937–003]

Southern Energy Delta, L.L.C. and

Southern Energy Potrero, L.L.C.;

Notice of Filing

October 11, 2000.

Take notice that on September 28,

2000, Southern Energy Delta, L.L.C. (SE

Delta) and Southern Energy Potrero,

L.L.C. (SE Potrero) (collectively the

Southern Parties) filed an Offer of

Settlement which represents an

integrated and complete resolution of

issues in the above-captioned

proceedings among and between the

following parties (the Supporting

Parties): the Southern Parties, the

California Independent System Operator

Corporation (CAISO), and Pacific Gas

and Electric Company (PG&E).

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest such filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

in accordance with Rules 211 and 214

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

385.214). All such motions and protests

should be filed on or before October 19,

2000. Protests will be considered by the

Commission to determine the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection. This

filing may also be viewed on the

Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/

online/rims.htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–26555 Filed 10–16–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EL00–62–006, et al.]

ISO New England, Inc., et al.; Electric

Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

October 11, 2000.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. ISO New England Inc.

[Docket No. EL00–62–006]

Take notice that on October 5, 2000,

the New England Power Pool (NEPOOL)

and ISO New England Inc. filed its

monthly update concerning its timetable

for implementation of the various

components of the Congestion

Management and Multi-Settlement

Systems, as directed by the Commission

in its June 28, 2000 Order in this

proceeding. Comment date: November 6, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER01–46–000]

Take notice that on October 5, 2000,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy),

tendered for filing a Service Agreement

under Cinergy’s Resale, Assignment or

Transfer of Transmission Rights and

Ancillary Service Rights Tariff (the

Tariff) entered into between Cinergy and

Merchant Energy Group of the

Americas, Inc. (MEGA). This Service

Agreement has been executed by both

parties and is to replace the existing

unexecuted Service Agreement. Comment date: October 26, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER01–47–000]

Take notice that on October 5, 2000,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy),

tendered for filing a Service Agreement

under Cinergy’s Resale, Assignment or

Transfer of Transmission Rights and

Ancillary Service Rights Tariff (the

Tariff) entered into between Cinergy and

Rainbow Energy Marketing Corporation

(REMC). This Service Agreement has

been executed by both parties and is to

replace the existing unexecuted Service

Agreement.

Comment date: October 26, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Powerex Corp.

[Docket No. ER01–48–000]

Take notice that on October 5, 2000,

Powerex Corp. tendered for filing Notice

of Succession pursuant to 18 CFR 35.16

and 131.51 of the Commission’s

Regulations. Powerex Corp. is

succeeding to the Rate Schedule FERC

No. 1, Market-Based Rate Schedule filed

by British Columbia Power Exchange

Corporation in Docket No. ER97–4024–

000, effective August 1, 1997.

Comment date: October 25, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. The Detroit Edison Company

[Docket No. ER01–49–000]

Take notice that on October 5, 2000,

The Detroit Edison Company (Detroit

Edison), tendered for filing, Service

Agreements (Service Agreements) for

Short-Term Firm and Non-Firm Pointto-Point Transmission Service under the

Open Access Transmission Tariff of

Detroit Edison, FERC Electric Tariff No.

1. These Service Agreements are

between Detroit Edison and DTE Energy

Trading, dated as of September 27,

2000. The parties have not engaged in

any transactions under the Service

Agreements prior to thirty days to this

filing.

Detroit Edison requests that the

Service Agreements be made effective as

rate schedules as of October 27, 2000.

Comment date: October 26, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. California Independent System

Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER01–50–000]

Take notice that on October 5, 2000,

the California Independent System

Operator Corporation (ISO), tendered for

filing the Middle Fork-Ralston Physical

Scheduling Plant Agreement

(Agreement) between the ISO and

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

(PG&E), for acceptance by the

Commission. The purpose of the

Agreement is to govern the treatment of

PG&E’s Middle Fork-Ralston Units,

which consists of three Generating