alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-24-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1999
<CASH>                                           2,194
<SECURITIES>                                    16,387
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,487
<INVENTORY>                                     76,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,604
<PP&E>                                         147,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 250,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,075
<BONDS>                                          3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,712
<OTHER-SE>                                     185,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   250,088
<SALES>                                        119,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,657
<CGS>                                           85,317
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,873
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,181
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,692
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,692
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

AND EMC CORPORATION, 

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00482-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

LETTER OF REQUEST FOR FOREIGN DISCOVERY

Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 47 Filed 11/06/20 Page 1 of 3
1

Defendants Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., and EMC Corporation, (collectively 

“Defendants”) seek foreign discovery from third party witnesses residing in France. Defendants 

have attached an Appendix with a Letter of Request which includes Document Requests and

Deposition Topics. Defendants respectfully request that the Court execute the Letter of Request

attached as Appendix I. Defendants further request that, after the Court has signed the Letter of 

Request, the Clerk of this Court authenticate the Court’s signature under the seal of this Court, and 

return the original signed and sealed executed Letter, and two certified copies of the signed and 

sealed executed Letters, to Defendants’ counsel, Barry K. Shelton, for delivery to the proper 

authority.

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, indicated 

that it reserves the right to serve its own foreign discovery in the future.

Dated: November 6, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 47 Filed 11/06/20 Page 2 of 3
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 6, 2020, all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the 

Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 47 Filed 11/06/20 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 99a


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned, as chief executive officer of The L.S. Starrett
Company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's
knowledge:

1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Douglas A. Starrett
Douglas A. Starrett
Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 9, 2003


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906
HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE L.S.STARRETT COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY
THE L.S.STARRETT COMPANY AND FURNISHED THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

ex99adascertDEC02amend.doc	-2-
Exhibit 99.1



















INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REPORT





Board of Directors

The Standard Register Company

Dayton, Ohio



We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of March 30, 2003 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the thirteen weeks ended March 30, 2003 and March 31, 2002.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.



We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.



Based upon our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of December 29, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 12, 2003, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 29, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/S/

BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP



BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP



April 22, 2003
Household Mortgage Loan Trust 2002-HC1


Original Principal Class A               $892,791,000.00
Number of $1,000 Class A Bonds                   892,791
Original Principal Class M               $158,216,000.00
Number of $1,000 Class M Bond                    158,216

                                                                           Total
                                                                            2002

CLASS A
Principal Payment                                                 151,356,654.52
Class A Interest Payment                                            8,114,601.32

Total Payment Amount - Class A                                    159,471,255.84


CLASS M
Principal Payment                                                  26,822,676.81
Class M Interest Payment                                            1,683,181.69

Total Payment Amount - Class M                                     28,505,858.50
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      2,216,000
<SECURITIES>                                6,032,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              55,023,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  476,000
<INVENTORY>                               106,413,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          155,954,000
<PP&E>                                     13,273,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              9,427,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            198,998,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      73,630,000
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    6,566,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 49,744,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              198,998,000
<SALES>                                   169,147,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          169,147,000
<CGS>                                     121,402,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             121,402,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           42,960,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            431,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             4,354,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                2,062,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                2,292,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .37
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the report of Worldwide Biotech & Pharmaceutical Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peiyi Tian, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Peiyi Tian


Peiyi Tian


Chief Financial Officer


August 14, 2009
EXHIBIT 99.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        OF METROPOLIS REALTY HOLDINGS LLC

      This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, and accompanies the annual report
on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the year ended December 31, 2002 of
Metropolis Realty Holdings LLC (the "Issuer").

      I, Stuart Koenig, the Treasurer of Issuer, certify that to the best of my
knowledge:

      (iii) the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
              (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (iv)  the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

Dated: March 28, 2003
                                             /s/ Stuart Koenig
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Stuart Koenig
                                            Vice President and Treasurer
### Adams, Kevin (OST)
From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject:

The Honorable Kathryn Murray, Crescent City, CA 95531 Dear Mayor Murray, Adams, Kevin (OST) Monday, April 30, 2012 9:50 AM 'cityclerk@crescentCity.org' James Bernard (JBernard@co.del-norte.ca.us); Devany, Dennis (OST)**~::;;** Request for Comment re Essential Air Service at Crescent City,**Califorfii~** "' '(:',1 ::r.>

0 0 Attached above is a copy ofthe proposal ofSkyWest, Inc., d/b/a United Express, to provide Crescent City's Essential Air Service (EAS) forthe two-year period from August 1, 2012, though July 31, 2014. We notethatthe service level SkyWest proposes-- aircraft type (30-seat Brasilia), hub (San Francisco), numberofintermediate stops (nonstop), and frequency (14 perweek)-- is the same as it is currently providing, as shown in the Orderattached above thattwo years ago selected SkyWest through July 31, 2012. The service SkyWest provides to Arcata/Eureka is provided bythe carrier on it's own motion and is not partofits proposal and can be dropped by the carrier at any point in time ifit so chooses- unlike its proposed service. While SkyWest was the only carrier to submit a proposal, and there was only one option in its proposal, we are nevertheless requesting your comment, as community comments from elected officials are acritical part ofthe carrierselection decision. Please look over SkyWest's proposal and get back to us by May22, 2012, with your comments. Replying with a signed PDF, preferably upon the city's own letterhead, is the fastest and probablythe best wayto respond. Ifyou have any questions, please do not hesitateto contact me. Best, Kevin Adams 202-366-1047 P.S. The earlier email Ijustsent bounced back as undeliverable, so I am resending.

1
Exhibit 32.1



Boston Life Sciences, Inc.

Certification of the President and Chief Operating Officer and the Chief Financial Officer

pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Boston Life Sciences, Inc. (the
Company), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:



|1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|DATE:    November 14, 2003 |  | /s/ MARC E. LANSER                                                                                                        
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           |  | Marc E. Lanser President and Chief Operating Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                                        
|                           | 
|                           |  | /s/ JOSEPH P. HERNON                                                                                                      
|                           |  | Joseph Hernon Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# ACTION:

Notice and request for comments. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to request approval on a new, and/or currently approved information collection. 

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before December 12, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send all comments regarding whether this information collection is necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency, whether the burden estimate is accurate, and if there are ways to minimize the estimated burden and enhance the quality of the collection, to Delorice P. Ford, Associate Administrator/BD, Office of Business Development, Office of Government Contracting and Business Development, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 8000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Delorice P. Ford, Associate Administrator/BD, 202-205-5852 or Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, (202) 205-7030. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title:*                    Small Disadvantaged Business(SDB) Recertification Application.                 

*Form No.:*                     2179                           ( print page 61017)    

*Description of Respondents:*                    Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) eligible companies.                 

*Annual Responses:*                     1,785.                 

*Annual Burden:*                     3,000.                 

Curtis B. Rich, 

Acting Chief, Administrative Information Branch. 

[FR Doc. 00-26276 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
StockerYale, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard P. Lindsay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Richard P. Lindsay 
|Richard P. Lindsay     
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 16, 2005
#### WILLIS v. STATE.

No. 26410.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 29, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. - ' ‘

DAVIDSON, Commissioner..

Drunk driving is the-offense; the punishment, a fine of $50.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception, without ■which nothing is presented for our consideration.- ...

The judgment of the trial court -is affirmed. ' ■ "

Opinion approved by the Court,
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1468
LASZLO GEORGE PALMAI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOSEPH CAMMARATA; GERALD B. LEE, Judge; GILBERT K. DAVIS & ASSOCIATES, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-97-100-A) Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Laszlo George Palmai, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Cammarata, Washington, D.C.; Gregory E. Lucyk, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Henry St. John Fitzgerald, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' m otions to dismiss Appellant's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Palmai v. Cammarata , No. CA-97-100-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### 1080 Warburton Corp. et al., Appellants, v John V. Torrisi et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to RPAPL 1921, *inter alia,*to cancel and discharge a purchase-money mortgage, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered April 26, 1989, which denied their application to declare a loan transaction null and void because of a usurious interest rate, and ordered the creation of replacement promissory notes, pledges and security agreements conforming to language and terms directed by the court.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioners’ contention, we find that the Supreme Court properly rejected their claim of usury. The so-called "loan transaction” in this case, a contractual arrangement between the parties, entitled the respondent sellers, John V. Torrisi, Joseph L. Torrisi and Angelo M. Torrisi, to receive an interest in a cooperative conversion plan upon their execution of a document evidencing a satisfaction of a purchase-money mortgage they took back as part of the sale of their apartment building to the petitioner purchasers. Thus, there was no loan or forebearance of money, a necessary requirement before there can be a finding of usury *(see,*General Obligations Law § 5-501; *Szerdahelyi v Harris,*67 NY2d 42, 46; *Orvis v Curtiss,*157 NY 657; *DeSimon v Ogden Assocs.,*88 AD2d 472, 477-481).

We have considered the petitioners’ remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.