alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 564 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 564

                  For the relief of Rigoberto Padilla.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2011

Ms. Schakowsky introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Rigoberto Padilla.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR RIGOBERTO PADILLA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Rigoberto Padilla shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Rigoberto Padilla enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Rigoberto Padilla, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Rigoberto 
Padilla shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5399 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5399

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Caramba Fungicide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

    Mr. Graves of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Caramba Fungicide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARAMBA FUNGICIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        5-amino-1-[2,6-     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          dichloro-4-                                                       12/31/2015
                          (trifluoromethyl)
                          phenyl]-4-
                          [(trifluoromethyl
                          ) sulfinyl]-1H-
                          pyrazole-3-
                          carbonitrile
                          (Caramba
                          Fungicide) (CAS
                          No. 125116-23-6)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3808.92.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### L. S. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Eva GRAMMER et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 10, 1954.

Fritz Krueger, Russell Jones, Somerset, Allen Prewitt, Frankfort, for appellant.

Merial Harris, Somerset, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Pulaski Circuit Court. R. C. Tartar, Judge.

We are affirming the judgment in this case which denied the appellant’s claim for $2,000 damages for an alleged breach of warranty in the sale of real estate, because we think the proof failed to show a breach of an express warranty and that the lower court properly directed a verdict in favor of the appellees.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
#### WYNNE v. STATE.

No. 25668.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1952.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for violation of the liquor law, with a fine of $1,000.00.

The record contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exception. The proceedings appear regular in every respect and nothing is presented for review by this court.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Harold F. Zagunis, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Sequoia
Residential Funding, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of the
Certificates for periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
reports;

      4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the
terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed in the
reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement; and

      5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement, that is included
in these reports.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter Credit Corporation, as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.,
as Servicer, Cendant Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, Bank of America, N.A.,
as Servicer, and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., as Servicer.

Date: March 31, 2005

/s/ Harold F. Zagunis
--------------------------
Signature
Name: Harold F. Zagunis
Title: Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
S ee T EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 4. 1 

## COURT OF APPEALS SEC OND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 07 2- CV I N R E L E OT I S AL L E N R E L AT OR

----- ----- -- OR I GI NAL P R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1

----- ----- -- T h e c o u r t h a s c o n s id e r e d r e la t o r ’s p e t it io n f o r w r it o f m a n d a m u s a n d is of th e o pi ni on t hatr el i ef s houl d be de ni ed. Accor di ngl y, r el at or ’ s pet i t i on f or w r i t of m and am us i s den i ed.
P E R CU R I AM P A N E L A : M C C O Y , J .; C A Y C E , C .J .; a n d D A U P H IN O T , J . DEL I VERE D: M a r c h 11, 2008
H. R. 5512 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to realign divisions within two judicial 

districts. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Divisional Realignment Act 

of 2012’’. 

SEC. 2. REALIGNMENT WITHIN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. 

Section 105(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Iron,’’ and ‘‘Saint Genevieve,’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (3)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘Iron,’’ after ‘‘Dunklin,’’; and 

(B) by inserting ‘‘Saint Genevieve,’’ after ‘‘Ripley,’’. 

SEC. 3. REALIGNMENT WITHIN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. 

Section 104 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 

striking subsection (a) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(a) The northern district comprises three divisions. 

‘‘(1) The Aberdeen Division comprises the counties of 

Alcorn, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Clay, Itawamba, Lee, Lowndes, 

Monroe, Oktibbeha, Prentiss, Tishomingo, Webster, and Winston. 

‘‘Court for the Aberdeen Division shall be held at Aberdeen, 

Ackerman, and Corinth. 

‘‘(2) The Oxford Division comprises the counties of Benton, 

Calhoun, DeSoto, Lafayette, Marshall, Panola, Pontotoc, 

Quitman, Tallahatchie, Tate, Tippah, Tunica, Union, and 

Yalobusha. 

‘‘Court for the Oxford Division shall be held at Oxford. 

‘‘(3) The Greenville Division comprises the counties of 

Attala, Bolivar, Carroll, Coahoma, Grenada, Humphreys, 

Leflore, Montgomery, Sunflower, and Washington. 

‘‘Court for the Greenville Division shall be held at Clarksdale, Cleveland, and Greenville.’’. 
H. R. 5512—2 

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

The amendments made by this Act take effect on the 60th 

day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000092066
<NAME> SOUTHERN ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         131,933
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,085
<PP&E>                                         208,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,083
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 372,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,130
<BONDS>                                         55,307
<COMMON>                                       521,347
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (215,562)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   372,222
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,498
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               118,619
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (100,121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (100,121)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (100,121)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yf i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f

orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). A K / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. T ON Y C AR Z E L L GR E E N, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 08- 30270 D. C . No . 3 : 9 8 - c r - 0 5 0 6 7 - B HS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on B e nj a m i n H . S e tt l e , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r17, 2009 ** B e f o r e : A L A R C Ó N , T R O T T , a n d T A S H I M A , C ir c u it J u d g e s . T onyC a r z e l l G r e e n appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rde ny i ng hi s 18 U . S . C . § 3582( c ) ( 2) m ot i on f orar e duc t i on of

s e nt e nc e . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on p u r s u a n tt o 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED FEB 03 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA K / Res ea r ch 08- 30270 2 G r e e n c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d i n de ny i ng hi s m ot i on f or r e s e nt e nc i ng pur s ua ntt o the r e tr oa c t i ve a m e ndm e nt s t o the c r a c k c oc a i ne S e nt e nc i ng G ui de l i ne s . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d note rri n de ny i ng the m ot i on b e c au s e G r e e n w a s s e n te n c e d a s ac a r e e ro f f e n d e rp u r s u a n t to U .S .S .G . § 4 B 1 .1 . Se e U ni te d State s v . W

e s s on , 58 3 F . 3d 72 8, 73 1 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). T o the e xt e nttha tG r e e n a r gue s tha the i s e nt i t l e d t o be r e s e nt e nc e d unde rthe a dvi s oryG ui de l i ne s pur s ua ntt o U ni ted Stat es v. Hi ck

s , 47 2 F . 3d 11 67 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 7 ) , th is a r g u m e n t a ls o la c k s m e r it. U .S .S .G § 1 B 1 .1 0 c m t. n .1 ( A ) ( 2 0 0 8 ) ; se e al s o U ni te d State s v . L e ni e ar , 5 7 4 F .3 d 6 6 8 , 6 7 3 - 7 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . AF F I RME D.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.

 

The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certify as follows:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company (the “Report”), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated   this 8th day of March, 2011 |                      |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                                |                      |
|                                |                      |
|                                | /s/   Robert S. Aisner    |
|                                | Robert   S. Aisner        |
|                                | Chief   Executive Officer |
|                                |                      |
|                                |                      |
|                                | /s/   Scott W. Fordham    |
|                                | Scott   W. Fordham        |
|                                | Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stuart Jenkins, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edward Davidowitz, J., at *Wade*hearing; Joan Sudolnik, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered June 8, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the first degree and sentencing him to concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 10 to 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

*274On successive days, defendant committed knifepoint robberies. Both incidents were joined in a single indictment. Each victim identified defendant in court and at a lineup.

We find no abuse of discretion in the denial of defendant’s motion for separate trials. The charges were properly joined (CPL 200.20 [2] [c]) and were severable only in the interest of justice for good cause shown (CPL 200.20 [3]). Although the crimes were similar in nature, the evidence in support of each was distinct and readily referable to the offense with respect to which it was introduced. Further, the trial court gave appropriate instruction to the jury on consideration of the separate offense *(People v Lombardi,*20 NY2d 266). Defendant’s untimely request for a missing witness charge in connection with the second incident was properly denied. There is nothing in the record to show that the youngster who did not testify was in a better position to identify defendant than complainant. *(People v Hill,*165 AD2d 691.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Standard Motor Products, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James
J. Burke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ James J. BurkeJames
      J. BurkeChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      6, 2010





*           A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Standard Motor Products, Inc. and will be retained by Standard Motor
Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-11-00443-CV

No. 04-11-00649-CV

Pamela SCHEEL and Gary M. Poenisch,

Appellants

v.

Brian ALFARO and Primera Energy Partners, L.L.C.,

Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2007-CI-11604 & 2007-CI-11604

Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, that portion of the trial court’s Order 

on Defendants’ Objections to Approval of Receiver’s Report, Motion to Set Aside Sale, Motion 

to Remove Receiver, and Motion for Sanctions sanctioning Gary Poenisch in the amount of 

$5,000.00 is REVERSED. The trial court’s (1) Order on Defendants’ Objections to Approval of 

Receiver’s Report, Motion to Set Aside Sale, Motion to Remove Receiver, and Motion for 

Sanctions and (2) Order Granting Motion to Set Aside Turnover Orders are both AFFIRMED in 

all other respects.

It is ORDERED that appellees recover their costs of appeal from appellants.

SIGNED May 15, 2013.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. and

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

 Defendants.

 

 Civil Action 6:20-cv-00507-ADA

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF GREG LOVE

Plaintiff, Neonode Smartphone LLC, files this Notice of Appearance and hereby notifies

the Court that Greg Love of Steckler Wayne Cherry & Love, PLLC, 107 East Main Street, 

Henderson, Texas 75652, greg@swclaw.com, is appearing on behalf of Neonode Smartphone 

LLC. The undersigned respectfully requests to be added as an attorney to be noticed so that he 

may receive copies of all filings in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Greg Love

Greg Love

Texas Bar No. 24013060

STECKLER WAYNE CHERRY

 & LOVE, PLLC

107 East Main Street

Henderson, Texas 75652

903.212.4444

903.392.2267 (Fax)

greg@swclaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Neonode Smartphone LLC

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 60 Filed 06/08/22 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served with a copy of this filing via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule 

CV-5(a) on June 8, 2022.

/s/ Greg Love

Greg Love

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 60 Filed 06/08/22 Page 2 of 2