alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5589 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Yellow 241. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Yellow 241. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISPERSE YELLOW 241. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 (3-Pyridinecarbonitrile,5-[2- 

(3,4-dichlorophenyl)diazenyl]- 

1,2- dihydro-6-hydroxy-1,4- 

dimethyl-2-oxo-) (Disperse 

Yellow 241) (CAS No. 

83249–52–9) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.11.35) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5589 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 13.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of ChemGenex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the “Company”)on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dr.Greg R. Collier, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(i)            the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(ii)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/Greg R. Collier

Name:  Dr. Greg R. Collier

Title:Chief Executive Officer

 

November23, 2007

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to ChemGenex Pharmaceuticals Limited and will be retained by ChemGenexPharmaceuticals Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 31.2

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust
National Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Motorola Debenture-Backed Series 2002-12 Trust (the Trust), certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed by
Lehman ABS Corporation in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report of the Trust;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or
similar agreement for inclusion in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my knowledge, except as
disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2012               
|                                   
|/s/ David J. Kolibachuk            
|David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
AIR RESOURCES BOARDVENTURA COUNTY APCD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 10 I. GENERAL INFORMATIONDistrict: Ventura County APCD Rule Nos.: 54 and 42Date Adopted: January 14, 2014Rule Titles: Sulfur Compounds (54), Permit Fees (42)Date Submitted to ARB: February 10, 2014 If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended: Rule 54 on June 14, 1994 and Rule 42 onApril 9, 2013Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA asa SIP Revision? (X) Yes ( ) NoIf NO, do not complete remainder of form.District Contact: Tyler Harris Phone No.: 805/645-1407Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: () New Rule (X) Amended: Amended Rule 54 will addthe 2010 sulfur dioxideNAAQS to the ground or sea level concentration limits, clarify the sulfur dioxide emission limit for combustion sources, clarify the excessemission fee calculation for exempt flaring, correct typographical errors and update references. Amended Rule 42 will clarify the excessemission fee calculation for exempt flaring to maintain consistency with Rule 54.Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): ROG NOxSO2PM10 CO TACII. EFFECT ON EMISSIONSComplete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emission. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s) and otherinformation. Attach calculation sheet showing howthe emissions information provided below was determined. See staff report Appendix A for emission calculations.Net Effect on Emissions: ( ) Increase ( ) Decrease ( X ) N/A No impact on emissions.II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONSEmission Reduction Commitment in SIP (Control Measure ) for this source category:Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: Area Affected:Future Year Control Profile Estimate:YearTons/yearReductions2012 BaselineTons/yearSubject to RuleControlLevelPercentControlControlLevelControl FactorAIR RESOURCES BOARDVENTURA COUNTY APCD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUSDistrict is: ( X ) Attainment ( ) Nonattainment () SplitApproximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: 185Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0 %Number of Large (>100 TPY) Sources Controlled: None Percent in Nonattainment Area: Not ApplicableIV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGYDo the Rules Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes.V. OTHER REQUIREMENTSRULE 54 (Sulfur Compounds) Amended Requirements include:Emission Limits (SO2Emission Limits): Section B.1Ground or Sea Level SO2Concentration Limits: Section B.2Test Methods: Section DExemptions: Section C.2.f.VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN(X) No Impact ( ) Impacts RFP ( ) Impacts attainmentDiscussion: Amendments to Rule 54 will update emission limits and ambient concentration limits for sulfur dioxide. Therefore,maintenance of attainment status for the sulfur dioxide and particulate matter NAAQS will be supportedbyamendments to both rules.
**EXHIBIT 31.3**

​

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a),**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

​

I, Cyrus Arman, Ph.D., certify that:

​
|  | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CytoDyn Inc.; and |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

​
|  | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

​

​

| ​                  |              |                    |
|--------------------------|--------------|--------------------|
| Date: September 28, 2022 | CYTODYN INC. |
| ​                  | (Registrant) |
| ​                  | ​      |
| ​                  | By:          | /s/ Cyrus Arman    |
| ​                  | ​      | Cyrus Arman, Ph.D. |
| ​                  | ​      | President          |

​

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5383 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5383

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 11.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Ms. Fudge introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 11.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASIC VIOLET 11.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.24 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Basic Violet 11) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1503

JERRY W. GOINGS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM R. ENDICOTT, D.D.S.; ENDICOTT DENTAL

CARE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

TOMMY MURPH, DMD,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-95-3922-4-22)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry W. Goings, Appellant Pro Se. Ruskin C. Foster, MCKAY, MCKAY,

HENRY & FOSTER, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Goings appeals the district court's orders (1) entering

judgment upon the jury's verdict in favor of the Defendants on his

medical malpractice action and (2) denying his motion for judgment

notwithstanding the verdict. Goings claims that the district court

erred by excluding evidence pertaining to a prior conviction of

Defendant William Endicott. Our review of the record discloses no

abuse of discretion. See United States v. Hassan-El, 5 F.3d 726,

731 (4th Cir. 1993) (district court's evidentiary rulings are reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26317]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering and Environmental 
Systems: Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering and Environmental 
Systems (1189).
    Date and Time: November 30-December 1, 2000; 8:00 am-5:00 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Room 580, 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Fred G. Heineken and Dewey Ryu, Program 
Directors, Division of Bioengineering and Environmental Systems, 
National Science Foundation; 4201 Wilson Boulevard; Arlington, 
Virginia 22230; Telephone: (703) 292-8320.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Biochemical Engineering/
Biotechnology CAREER proposals as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 10, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-26317 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-5 Filed 03/17/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-5 Filed 03/17/21 Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAREN VANESSA ROJASHERNANDEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 12-73752 

Agency No. A097-808-964 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2018**

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Karen Vanessa Rojas-Hernandez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, 

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying

her motion to reconsider its prior denial of her motion to reopen removal 

proceedings conducted in absentia. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 21 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-73752

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. 

Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We dismiss in part 

and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Rojas-Hernandez’s challenges to the 

agency’s denial of her motion to reopen, because this petition is not timely as to 

the BIA’s August 2012 order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (petition for review must 

be filed within 30 days of the order under review).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Rojas-Hernandez’s motion 

to reconsider on the ground that she did not meet her burden to show she provided 

an address at which she could be contacted, where all immigration court notices 

sent to the address on file were returned as undeliverable. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) (a motion to reopen in absentia proceedings based on lack of 

notice may be filed at any time); 8 U.S.C. §1229(a)(1)(F)(i) (“the alien must 

immediately provide . . . a written record of an address . . . at which the alien may 

be contacted . . . ”); 8 U.S.C. § 1229(c) (“Service by mail [of a hearing notice] 

shall be sufficient if there is proof of attempted delivery to the last address 

provided by the alien . . .”)

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                          ( print page 60672)    

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applicants must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 26, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Maria Villanueva, Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:                

*1. Greater Bay Bancorp,*                     Palo Alto, California; to acquire the Matsco Companies, Inc., Emeryville, California, and thereby engage in commercial lending, equipment lease financing, and management consulting and counseling activities, pursuant to §§ 225.28(b)(1), (2), (3), and (9)(i)(A)(2) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 6, 2000.

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-26229 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5639 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5639

        To reduce temporarily the duty on Hexythiazox Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

  Mr. Gosar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To reduce temporarily the duty on Hexythiazox Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HEXYTHIAZOX TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Hexythiazox Technical) is 
amended--
            (1) in the general rate of duty column, by striking 
        ``Free'' and inserting ``4.7%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

Maurin, Lawrence

From: Maurin, Lawrence

Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 8:58 AM

To: 'tbillie@navajo-nsn.gov'

Subject: SRP Navajo Gen. Station - Coal Treatment System Project - NHPA Initiation of 

Consultation

Attachments: Attachment 3 NGS SRP Minor Mod Application 2-20-2015.pdf; Attachment 4 

NGSMinorModModeling.pdf; Initiation_of_Consultation_10_23_2015.pdf

Dear Tamara,

I have attached U.S. EPA’s request for initiation of consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act for Salt

River Project’s proposed Coal Treatment System project at Navajo Generating Station near Page, AZ.

I have also included for your reference the application for a Minor New Source Review Permit and Air Emissions

Modeling Analysis. We request that your office review the attached information and express interest in any further

consultation with EPA by November 30, 2015.

Attachments 1 and 2 have been omitted due to attachment size limits, however, these maps are contained within

attachments 3 and 4.

We have also forwarded hard copies of these documents to your office addressed to:

Ora Marek‐Martinez

Department Manager

Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department

PO Box 4950

Window Rock, Arizona 86515

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Larry Maurin

Larry Maurin

Air Permits Office (AIR‐3)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

(415) 972-3943 (phone) / (415) 947-3579 (fax) 

Maurin.Lawrence@epa.gov