alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00623-CV

In re J. B.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Relator J.B. has filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to have this Court 

(1) vacate the trial court’s temporary order granting the Texas Department of Family and 

Protective Services temporary conservatorship of J.B.’s child, (2) instruct the trial court to return 

the child to J.B., and (3) instruct the trial court to dismiss the Department’s case. In the 

mandamus petition, J.B. asserts that the trial court abused its discretion by issuing the 

July 15, 2019 temporary order without making a finding based on sufficient evidence that 

“reasonable efforts, consistent with the circumstances and providing for the safety of the child,

were made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child.” Tex. Fam. Code 

§ 262.102(a)(4). However, J.B. states that the trial court held a hearing on August 8, 2019, at 

which it denied motions filed by J.B. and allowed the Department to maintain control over the 

child. When J.B.’s petition for writ of mandamus was filed, the Court instructed him that the 

petition did not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.7(a)(2), which establishes 

that “Relator must file with the petition: . . . (2) a properly authenticated transcript of any 
2

relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, 

or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complained.” No 

transcript from the hearing has been submitted to this Court, nor has a statement been submitted 

that no testimony was adduced in connection with the complained-of matter. As the party

seeking relief, J.B. has the burden of providing this Court with a sufficient record to establish his

right to mandamus relief. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). He has 

failed to do so, and in the absence of an adequate record, we are unable to determine that J.B. is 

entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, on this record, we deny the petition for writ of 

mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Filed: September 27, 2019
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-4119

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GIOVANNI OSWALDO AMAYA-CORNEJO, a/k/a Califas,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cr-00383-DKC-1)

Submitted: September 28, 2018 Decided: October 10, 2018

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael D. Montemarano, MICHAEL D. MONTEMARANO, PA, Ellicott City, 

Maryland, for Appellant. Ray Daniel McKenzie, Assistant United States Attorney, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Giovanni Oswaldo Amaya-Cornejo seeks to appeal his conviction and sentence. 

The Government has filed a notice stating that the appeal should be dismissed as 

untimely.

In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within 14 days after 

the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a 

showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of 

up to 30 days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 

759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

The district court entered judgment on May 10, 2017. The notice of appeal was 

filed on February 7, 2018. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). Because 

Amaya-Cornejo failed to file a timely notice of appeal or obtain an extension of the 

appeal period, we agree with the Government’s position and dismiss the appeal as 

untimely.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register: August 10, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 153)]
[Notices]               
[Page 48320]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10au10-30]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 
National Petroleum Council

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the National Petroleum 
Council. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 
770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in the 
Federal Register.

DATES: Tuesday, September 14, 2010, 9 a.m.-11 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The Willard Hotel, 1401 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Johnson, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Oil and Natural Gas (FE-30), Washington, DC 20585. 
Phone: 202-586-5600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Committee: To provide advice, information, and 
recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on matters relating to oil 
and natural gas, or the oil and natural gas industry.

Tentative Agenda

 Call to Order and Introductory Remarks
 Remarks by the Honorable Daniel B. Poneman, Deputy Secretary 
of Energy
 Progress Report of the NPC Committee on Future Transportation 
Fuels
 Progress Report of the NPC Committee on Prudent Development of 
North America Resources
 Administrative Matters
 Discussion of Any Other Business Properly Brought Before the 
Council
 Adjournment

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The 
Chairman of the Council will conduct the meeting to facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Any member of the public who wishes to 
file a written statement to the Council will be permitted to do so, 
either before or after the meeting. Members of the public who wish to 
make oral statements pertaining to agenda items should contact Nancy 
Johnson at the address or telephone number listed above. Request must 
be received at least five days prior to the meeting and reasonable 
provisions will be made to include the presentation on the agenda.
    Transcripts: Available for public review and copying at the Public 
Reading Room, Room 1G-033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on August 4, 2010.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-19711 Filed 8-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
##### 



Exhibit 99.4 (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP350 S. Grand Ave.Los Angels CA 9007lTelephone (213) 236 3000
 Report of Independent Auditors To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of GreenPoint Financial Corporation: We have examined managements assertion
about GreenPoint Financial Corporation and
its subsidiaries, including GreenPoint
Mortgage Funding, Inc. (the Company)
compliance with the minimum servicing
standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of Americas Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
(USAP) as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2003 included in the
accompanying management assertion (see
Exhibit I). Management is responsible for
the Companys compliance with those minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on managements
assertion about the Companys compliance
based on our examination. Our examination was made in accordance with
attestation standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about
the Companys compliance with the minimum
servicing standards and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not
provide a legal determination on the
Companys compliance with the minimum
servicing standards. In our opinion, managements assertion that
the Company complied with the aforementioned
minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly
stated, in all material respects. (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP)
March 25, 2004




---



##### 



Exhibit I Managements Assertion Regarding Compliance
With Minimum Servicing Standards As of and for the year ended December 31,
2003, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.
(the Company), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of GreenPoint Financial Corporation, has
complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of
Americas Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period, GreenPoint
Financial Corporation maintained on behalf
of the Company, errors and omissions and
employee fidelity bond insurance policies
in the amount of $20,000,000 and
$50,000,000, respectively. March 25, 2004 /s/ Becky Poisson  
 /s/ Nathan Hieter  
 /s/ David Petrini  
 /s/ S.A Ibrahim
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA

INC. ET AL.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00541-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00544-ADA

DECLARATION OF BRETT MANGRUM

My name is Brett Mangrum. I am over the age of 21 and am competent to make this 

declaration. The facts stated herein are within my personal knowledge and are true and correct. I 

am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Texas. I am with Etheridge Law Group in 

Southlake, Texas.

1. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of a petition for inter partes review, 

dated Nov. 30, 2020, filed by Huawei in Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. WSOU Investments LLC 

d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, Case No. IPR2021-00229. 

2. Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Exhibit 1003 (declaration of Mr. 

Peter Rysavy) attached to the petition identified in paragraph 1, supra.

3. Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the specification 3GPP TS 36.321 

v.8.2.0 (2008 May), as retrieved online at:

https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/36_series/36.321/36321-820.zip. 

Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 44-1 Filed 02/05/21 Page 1 of 2
4. Attached as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of TSG-RAN Working Group 1 

meeting #14, as retrieved online at:

ftp://www.3gpp.org/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_14/Docs/PDFs/R1-00-0869.pdf.

5. Attached as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of Huawei’s Invalidity Contentions 

dated Dec. 7, 2020, as served in the above-captioned matters.

6. Attached as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of a petition for inter partes review, 

dated Nov. 30, 2020, filed by Huawei in Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. WSOU Investments LLC 

d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, Case No. IPR2021-00227. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is 

true and correct and executed on February 5, 2021.

/s/ Brett A. Mangrum

Brett A. Mangrum

Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 44-1 Filed 02/05/21 Page 2 of 2
| Subsidiary and Name Under WhichBusiness is Done |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporationor Organization |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                          |   |                                                        |
| Access National Bank                                                          |   | United States                                               |
| Access National Leasing Corporation (inactive)                                |   | Virginia                                                    |
| Access National Mortgage Corporation                                          |   | Virginia                                                    |
| Access Capital Management LLC                                                 |   | Virginia                                                    |
| Acme Real Estate LLC                                                          |   | Virginia                                                    |
| Access National Real Estate LLC                                               |   | Virginia                                                    |
| United First Mortgage Corporation (inactive)                                  |   | Virginia                                                    |
| Access National Capital Trust I (inactive)                                    |   | Virginia                                                    |
| Access National Capital Trust II                                              |   | Virginia                                                    |

----
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MFW Wine Co., LLC, A6 Wine : Company, and GECC2 LLC : d/b/a/ Bloomsday Cafe : Petitioners :

:

v. : No. 251 M.D. 2020

: Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, : Respondent :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 2 7 th day of May , 20 20

, pursuant to this Court’s

authority under Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 1701(b)(1) to clarify or

correct an order on appeal, it is hereby ORDERED that the Court’s Opinion and

Order filed on May 1, 2020

, 1 is AMENDED to corre ct a typographical error on

page 7 in footnote 9 of the O pinion . Specifically, the phrase “ should not be

construed ” is amended to read “should only be construed.” Footnote 9 of the

O pinion , subsequent to the amendment, now provides in its entirety :

In ad dition to focusing on the General Assembly’s use of the word “may,” PLCB also directs the Court to the opening phrase of Section 1799.2

- E of the Fiscal Code

— “Notwithstanding the provisions of section 305”

— as further support of its proffered construction. 72 P.S.
§ 1799.2

- E. This language, however, is clearly used to indicate the General Assembly’s intent that what follows

should only be construed to override conflicting provisions in Section 305(a) of the Liquor Code, if any. As noted above, the only pos sible conflict between the

1 Initially, the Court designated the Opinion and Order as an unreported M emorandum

O pinion and Order

. By order dated May 7, 2020, the Court chan ged the designation to

“ reported

. ”two sections is the compliance date by which PLCB must implemen t a procedure to process direct

- delivery special

orders.

In all other respects, the Court’s Opinion and Order remains intact, and a corrected

copy is attached.

P. KEVIN BROBSON, Judge
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5478 

To suspend temporarily the duty on light emitting diode (LED) Tubular 

LED (TLED). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on light emitting diode 

(LED) Tubular LED (TLED). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) TUBULAR LED 

4 (TLED). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Light emitting diode 

(LED) Tubular LED 

(TLED) (provided for in 

subheading 9405.40.80) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5478 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.5

PHH Mortgage Services

[PHH LOGO]

February 25, 2005

Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.
One Belvedere Place, Suite 330
Mill Valley, CA 94941

HSBC Bank USA
452 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10018

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

Investor number(s)/Deal name(s): 168/ SEQUOIA 2003-6

Dear Investor, Master Servicer or Trustee,

The undersigned officer certifies the following for PHH Mortgage Corp. f/K/a
Cendant Mortgage Corp., for the 2004 calendar year. To the best of our
knowledge:

      a)    The activities and performances of the Servicer during the preceding
            Fiscal year under the terms of the above Servicing Agreement, Trust
            Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer Guide and
            to the best of my knowledge the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
            duties, responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement
            throughout such year, or if there has been default or failure of the
            Servicer to perform any such duties, responsibilities or
            obligations, a description of each default or failure and the nature
            and status thereof has been reported to HSBC Bank USA;

      b)    The Servicer is currently an approved FNMA or FHLMC Servicer in good
            standing;

      c)    The fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions Insurance Policy and any
            other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing Agreement,
            Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer
            Guide are in full force and effect;

      d)    All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood Insurance
            Policy (if applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if
            applicable), with respect to each Mortgaged Property, have been paid
            and that such insurance policies are in full force and effect;

      e)    All real estate taxes, governmental assessments and any other
            expenses accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or
            encumbrance on any Mortgage Property, have been paid, or if any such
            costs or expenses have been paid with respect to any Mortgaged
            Property, the reason for the non-payment has been reported to HSBC
            Bank USA;

      f)    All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded;
            and

      g)    All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgaged
            Property required per section 6050H, 6050J and 6050P of the Internal
            Revenue Code, respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified by

/s/ William E. Fricke, Jr.
--------------------------
William E. Fricke, Jr.
Assistant Vice President
      FEB 25, 2005
Date: February 25, 2005
Exhibit 15.3



| | Registered
    Office:51
    Reserve RoadPickering
    BrookWestern
    Australia 6076ACN
    120 266 999 | Telephone:
    +61 (0)8 9293 7449Facsimile:
    +61 (0)8 9293 7459E-Mail:info@piranmining.com.auWebsite:www.piranmining.com.au
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The
Board of Directors of

Randgold
Resources Limited (the “Company”)



March
30, 2016



|Re: |  | Consent
|--- |  | -------



Ladies
and Gentlemen:



I,
Timothy Peters, do hereby consent to the reference of myself in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2015 (the “Annual Report”) to which this consent is an exhibit, to any reference to Mr.
Timothy Peters under the heading “Experts” in any registration statement into which the Annual Report is incorporated
by reference, and to the citation and/or summarization of the reserve statement in the Annual Report as calculated by me for
the Gounkoto underground Ore Reserves and Kibali underground Ore Reserves.



|Dated
    this 30th day of March 2016. |                  
|-------------------------------------- | -----------------
|                                       |                  
|By:                                    |                  
|Name:                                  | Timothy Peters   
|                                       | Title: Consultant








PIRAN
MINING PTY LTD ATF the T & A Peters Family Trust ABN 14 330 471 566
From: “Eric Waither” <EWalther@sierraresearch.com>

To: Gerardo Rios/R9/USEPA/LIS@EPA, Shirley Rivera/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, TylerFox/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Roger Brode/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: “Jim Rexroad” <Jim.Rexroadmacquarie.com>, “Holmstead, Jeff’

<Jeff.Holmsteadbg11p.com>, “Gary Rubenstein” <GRubenstein@sierraresearch.com>

History: This message has been forwarded.

4 Attachments

imageOOl .jpg imageOO2.gif APC_N02_TransmittalLetter.pdf Hourly_N02_Standard_Compliance.pdf

On behalf of Avenal Power Center, LLC, please find the transmittal letter and the report

“Supplemental NO2Air Quality Impact Analysis” for the Avenal Energy Project.

Eric Walther

sierra research

1801J Street

Sacramento, CA 95811

916-444-6666 x121 Office indirect

file://C:\Documents and Settings\SRIVERO2\Local Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\web98... 5/24/2011
file :1/C :\Documents and Settings\SRIVERO2\Local Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\web98.. 5/24/201 1
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 14, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131511-2 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan GLENN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131511-2 COA: 268429; 268430 Montcalm CC: 97-000354-NF; 05-006169-NF AAA MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to ap peal the March 31, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the March 31, 2006 or der of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the C ourt of Appeals for plenary consideration. Because the February 2, 2006 order of th e Montcalm Circuit Court is a postjudgment order awarding attorney fees and costs, it is a final order under MCR 7.202(6 )(a)(iv) that is appealable as a matter of right under MCR 7.203(A)(1).

We do not retain jurisdiction.

p0907 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 14, 2006

Clerk
#### BENNETT v. STATE.

No. 25875.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 4, 1952.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The primary offense is driving while intoxicated, with counts charging prior convictions for the purpose of enhancing the punishment; the punishment, 2 years in jail and a fine of $1,000.

The witnesses for the State testified that an automobile driven by appellant, while on his left-hand side of the road, collided with an automobile containing some high school boys, causing injuries to them and to appellant. They further testified that appellant was intoxicated.

The appellant and his witnesses testified that he was not intoxicated.

The jury resolved this issue of fact, and we find the evidence sufficient to support their verdict.

No bills of exception appear in the record, and the proceedings appear regular; the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.