alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard Fisher, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Cytation Corporation; 
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 19, 2004

/s/Richard Fishser____________ 
Richard Fisher 
Chairman and Acting Chief Financial
Officer
---

|EXHIBIT 13.1                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                      
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald W. Thiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Amarc Resources Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 (the Annual Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:  | July 29, 2013                               | 
|------ | ------------------------------------------- | 
|       |                                             | 
|       | /s/ Ronald
Thiessen                         | 
|       |                                             | 
|By:    | Ronald W. Thiessen                          | 
|Title: | President and Chief Executive
      Officer | 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
Exhibit
14.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the Randgold Resources
Limited Share Option Scheme of our report dated June 28, 2005 (except
for Note 5 which is as of September 22, 2005) relating to the financial
statements of Randgold Resources Limited and its subsidiaries and joint
venture which appears in this Form 20-F/A.

/s/
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Chartered AccountantsLondon United Kingdom
September 22, 2005

---
#### Board of Education of the Depew Union Free School District, Respondent, v Depew Teachers Organization, Inc., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 3.)

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court’s order granting plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment, declaring that the July 22, 1987 agreement is null and void, was proper. By expanding the statutory recall rights of teachers who have been laid off, that agreement contravened the express terms of Education Law § 2510 (3) *(see, Matter of Union Free School Dist. No. 2 v Nyquist,*38 NY2d 137, 144; *Matter of Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School Dist. Bd. of Educ.,*148 AD2d 621). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J.—dismiss complaint.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quest Group International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Craig Davis, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Craig Davis
------------------------------
Craig Davis
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
December 21, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC,

 Plaintiff 

-vDELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL 

INC., EMC CORPORATION, 

 Defendant 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

6-20-cv-00473 

6-20-cv-00474 

6-20-cv-00475 

6-20-cv-00476 

6-20-cv-00477 

6-20-cv-00478 

6-20-cv-00479 

6-20-cv-00480 

6-20-cv-00481 

6-20-cv-00482 

6-20-cv-00485 

6-20-cv-00486 

ORDER APPOINTING TECHNICAL ADVISOR 

The Court hereby appoints Dr. Joshua J. Yi to serve as the Technical Advisor for the Court 

in this case. Dr. Yi’s contact information is as follows: 

Dr. Joshua J. Yi 

13492 Research Blvd; Ste. 120 – #445 

Austin, TX 78750-2254 

josh@joshuayipatentlaw.com 

Dr. Yi will assist the Court with technical issues related to the claim construction process 

and advise the Court regarding preliminary and final claim constructions. Because a technical 

advisor serves essentially as a law clerk to the Court and will be familiar with the claim 

construction issues in this case, Dr. Yi may also assist the Court in drafting a claim construction 

order. 

The parties are instructed to mail a paper copy of the claim construction briefs and a USB 

drive with any exhibits and/or technology tutorials to the above address no later than at least 10 

days before the claim construction hearing. 

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 82 Filed 04/01/21 Page 1 of 2
Finally, depending on the needs of the case, Dr. Yi may also assist the Court with motions 

for summary judgment, Daubert motions, at trial, and with post-trial motions. 

SIGNED this 1st day of April, 2021. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 82 Filed 04/01/21 Page 2 of 2
#### Lyman E. Kipp, Plaintiff, *v.*Hill Road Home Corporation et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Westchester County,

October 11, 1957.

*Morrie SlifMn*for plaintiff.

*Howard Henig*for Hill Road Home Corporation, defendant.

Robert Dosoher, J.

This is an application, brought in an action for specific performance of a contract to convey real property for summary judgment or, in the alternative for the posting of bonds in connection with the *lis pendens.*

So much of the motion as deals with summary judgment can be readily denied. There are issues of fact in the case that may not be determined until the trial.

The alternative relief requested presents a more serious problem. It was the law, prior to September 1, 1957, that a *lis pendens*in an action for specific performance of a contract to convey real property could not be discharged or cancelled by a deposit or undertaking *(Bienstock*v. *Nista Constr. Co.,*225 App. Div. 534). On September 1, 1957 chapter 876 of the Laws of 1957 became effective and changed the prior concepts. Presently, “whether or not the court determines that adequate relief can be secured [in an action for specific performance of a con*52tract to convey real property] * * * by a deposit of money or the giving of an undertaking, the court may order that the notice be cancelled, upon the deposit of money or the giving of an undertaking ” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 124, subd. 2).

The case now before the court should be a classic example of when such relief should be granted. It involves a one-family dwelling in a development. Nothing in the papers shows this house to be extraordinary. Custom and precedent alone throw a mantle of uniqueness about this property; progress and today’s standards generally dictates that one development house is substantially as good as another in the same price range.

Pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 2 of section 124 of the Civil Practice Act, the plaintiff will be ordered to file within five days after the service of a copy of the order hereon, with notice of entry, a bond in the sum of $2,500 or deposit a like sum of money to indemnify the defendants for any and all damages that may be incurred if the notice of pendency is not cancelled. In the event of the failure of plaintiff to file such bond or deposit such money, defendants may have the notice of pendency can-celled by filing a bond in the sum of $5,000 or depositing a like sum to hold the plaintiff harmless for any damages he may sustain. Further, in accordance with the quoted section, either party may move to increase or decrease the amount of the bond or deposit.

Settle order on notice.
1

Mears, Gilbert

From: Kimberly Donovan <kimberlox@hotmail.com>

Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 2:04 PM

To: Mears, Gilbert

Subject: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281

Mr. Gilbert Mears

Docket#: EPA‐HQ‐TRI‐2013‐0281

Toxics Release Inventory Program Division

Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW  

Washington, DC 20460

Dear Mr. Mears: I am deeply concerned about the lack of regulation the shale gas industry receives in the

State of Pennsylvania. It is unbelievable to me that this industry is exempt from the safe water drinking act.

This industry uses toxic chemicals in their process but the general public who lives in the communities

containing theses wells have no right to know what these chemicals are. It is critically important that this

industry not be exempt from the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting. I live in Lawrence County, Western

Pennsylvania, where gas drilling is beginning. We drink well water. I feel like I have a 50/50 chance of my 

water being contaminated when drilling starts in our township. Then what do we do when we don't 

have water? Have you tried to live without clean water? Communities have clean water ... drilling 

begins ... their water is contaminated and they are told it is not due to the drilling. These people are 

not rich Mr. Mears. What are they supposed to do? Few families have the resources to start over 

somewhere else. Alot of people are elderly in these areas. They have no options when their land, air 

and water are contaminated.

It is my understanding that injection fluids can contain benzene (a carcinogen) and ethylbenzene (a 

probable carcinogen). Yet the drilling companies do not have to provide any safeguards for 

underground water supplies. 

Do you understand my concern? We need these companies to do chemical reporting so the people living in these 

communities know what their potential contamination may be. 

Sincerely,

Kimberly Donovan

771 Davis Road

Ellwood City, PA 16117
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-374-000]

                    In the Commission's order issued on August 23, 2000,[1]                                          the Commission directed that a technical conference be held to address issues raised by the filing.                

A technical conference was held on Thursday, September 14, 2000. At that conference the parties indicated that another conference is warranted.

Take notice that the technical conference will be held on Tuesday, October 17, 2000, at 10 a.m., in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426.

All interested parties and Staff are permitted to attend.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr., 

Acting Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             92 FERC 61,173 (2000).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-26127  Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5599 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on C5–8 Perfluorocarbonalkanes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. ELLISON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on C5–8 

Perfluorocarbonalkanes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. C5–8 PERFLUOROCARBONALKANES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.91 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 C5–8 Perfluorocarbonalkanes) is amended by striking the 

7 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5599 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5498 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on plastic laminate sheets. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. SCHMIDT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on plastic laminate 

sheets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASTIC LAMINATE SHEETS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Plastic laminate sheets 

consisting of layers of Polyethylene Film; Polyethylene Coextrusion Copolymer of Low Density 

Polyethylene and Ethylene 

Acrylic Acid; and Aluminum Foil (provided for 

in subheading 3920.10.00) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5498 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

AND EMC CORPORATION, 

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00479-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

LETTER OF REQUEST FOR FOREIGN DISCOVERY

Case 6:20-cv-00479-ADA Document 44 Filed 11/06/20 Page 1 of 3
1

Defendants Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., and EMC Corporation, (collectively 

“Defendants”) seek foreign discovery from third party witnesses residing in France. Defendants 

have attached an Appendix with a Letter of Request which includes Document Requests and

Deposition Topics. Defendants respectfully request that the Court execute the Letter of Request

attached as Appendix F. Defendants further request that, after the Court has signed the Letter of 

Request, the Clerk of this Court authenticate the Court’s signature under the seal of this Court, and 

return the original signed and sealed executed Letter, and two certified copies of the signed and 

sealed executed Letters, to Defendants’ counsel, Barry K. Shelton, for delivery to the proper 

authority.

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, indicated 

that it reserves the right to serve its own foreign discovery in the future.

Dated: November 6, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 6:20-cv-00479-ADA Document 44 Filed 11/06/20 Page 2 of 3
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 6, 2020, all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the 

Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Case 6:20-cv-00479-ADA Document 44 Filed 11/06/20 Page 3 of 3
CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








Board
      of
      Directors and the Shareholders


Tennessee
      Valley Financial Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
      Forms S-3 and S-8 of Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary
      of
      our report dated April 2, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial
      statements of Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary which
      reports appear in Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings Inc.’s 2006 Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB.





/s/
      Dixon
      Hughes PLLC





Asheville,
      North Carolina


January
      16, 2008
1

The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-4023

___________

Stacy Abram, Jr., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

State of Arkansas; City of Earle, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: September 7, 2005

Filed: September 12, 2005

___________

Before MELLOY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Stacy Abram, Jr. sought to remove a criminal case pending against him in Earle

City, Arkansas, to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1443. Upon the City of

Earle’s motion, the district court1

 remanded the action to state court. This appeal

followed.

We note our authority to review whether the district court erred in denying

removal under section 1443, see 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), and we agree with the district
-2-

court that Abram failed to show any grounds to support his invocation of section

1443, see 28 U.S.C. §1443; City of Greenwood v. Peacock, 384 U.S. 808, 828 (1966);

Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780, 788, 792, 803 (1966).

Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

      ( print page 59043)    
The U.S. Small Business Administration, North Florida District Office, Jacksonville, Florida, Advisory Council will hold a public meeting from 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m., October 26, 2000, located at the University Center, 12000 Alumni Drive, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, to discuss such matters as may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present. For further information write or call Claudia D. Taylor, U.S. Small Business Administration, 7825 Baymeadows Way, Suite 100-B, Jacksonville, Florida 32256 (904) 443-1933. 

Bettie Baca,

Counselor to the Administrator/Public Liaison.

[FR Doc. 00-25369 Filed 10-2-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P