alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          44,605
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,300
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    122,086
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         231,603
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           231,755
<LOANS>                                        531,670
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 965,802
<DEPOSITS>                                     665,834
<SHORT-TERM>                                   116,515
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             46,900
<LONG-TERM>                                     41,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,472
<COMMON>                                         8,265
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 965,802
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,259
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,715
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   214
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,188
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,405
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,432
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,756
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      844
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,268
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,003
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,003
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35<F1>
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.77
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,229
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,075
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,415
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,678
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      970
<RECOVERIES>                                        43
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,595
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,911
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,684
        
<FN>
<F1>
*Effective December 31, 1997, the Company adopted SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per
Share." Accordingly, the Company has restated EPS for March 31, 1997 as follows:
      BASIC           $.32
      DILUTED         $.30
</FN>

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2094

HANNA DESTAW,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: March 24, 2010 Decided: April 2, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed in part and denied in part by unpublished per 

curiam opinion.

Hanna Destaw, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel Eric Goldman, Senior 

Litigation Counsel, Eric Warren Marsteller, Office of 

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Hanna Destaw, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration 

judge’s denial of her requests for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

Destaw first argues that she established extraordinary 

circumstances to excuse her failure to file her asylum 

application within one year of her arrival in the United States. 

We lack jurisdiction to review this determination pursuant to 8 

U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2006), and find that Destaw has failed to 

raise a constitutional claim or question of law that would fall 

under the exception set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) 

(2006). See Gomis v. Holder, 571 F.3d 353, 358-59 (4th Cir. 

2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 1040 (2010). Given this 

jurisdictional bar, we cannot review the underlying merits of 

Destaw’s asylum claim. Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of 

her petition for review.

Destaw also contends that the Board and the 

immigration judge erred in denying her request for withholding 

of removal. “Withholding of removal is available under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1231(b)(3) if the alien shows that it is more likely than not 

that her life or freedom would be threatened in the country of 

removal because of her race, religion, nationality, membership 
3

in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Gomis, 571 

F.3d at 359; see 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3) (2009). Based on our 

review of the record, we find that substantial evidence supports 

the denial of Destaw’s request for withholding of removal.*

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review in 

part and deny the petition for review in part. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

 

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART 

AND DENIED IN PART

 * Destaw has failed to raise any challenges to the denial of 

her request for protection under the Convention Against Torture. 

She has therefore waived appellate review of this claim. See

Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004) 

(finding that failure to raise a challenge in an opening brief 

results in abandonment of that challenge); Edwards v. City of 

Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999) (same).
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000006

11-MAY-2018

08:37 AM
# Court of Appeals

First District of Texas

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01

- 14

- 00984

- CV

Tiffany Thomas

v

.

T. Jayakumar, First Street Hospital, and First Surgical Partners, LLC

NO. 2014

- 22071 IN THE 334TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS C OUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/ DUE STATUS PAID BY

SUPP CLK RECORD

MT FEE
CLK RECORD
STATEWIDE EFILING
FILING

MT FEE $34.00

$10.00 $189.00 $20.00 $175.00 $10.00 03/05/2015

01/30/2015
01/20/2015
01/08/2015
01/08/2015
12/17/2014 PAID

E

- PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

E

- PAID UNK

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT



### The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are $4 3 8 .00.

Cou rt costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine , Clerk o f the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHERE OF, witness my hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for theFirst District of Texas, this April 22, 2016

.
Exhibit 10.8


              AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE SPECIAL STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
             BETWEEN VON HOFFMANN CORPORATION AND ROBERT A. UHLENHOP
             -------------------------------------------------------


                     Von Hoffmann Holdings Inc. (formerly named Von Hoffmann
Corporation, the "Company") and Robert A. Uhlenhop (the "Executive") hereby
enter into and agree to this Amendment No. 2 to the Special Stock Option
Agreement previously executed by the Company and Executive, dated as of May 22,
1997 (as amended on March 15, 2001, the "Special Stock Option Agreement"),
pursuant to which the Executive was granted a nonqualified option to purchase
1,200,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company under
the 1997 Stock Option Plan.

                     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

1. Section 2.b.(ii) of the Special Stock Option Agreement is hereby deleted in
its entirety and replaced with the following:

                     "(ii) your employment with the Company and its subsidiaries
           shall have terminated during the Fiscal Year by reason of your death
           or your Permanent Disability (as such term is defined in the
           Employment Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2001, among the
           Company, Von Hoffmann Corporation (formerly named Von Hoffmann Press,
           Inc.) and you (the "Employment Agreement"))."

2. Except as provided in this Amendment No. 2, the rights and duties of the
parties pursuant to the Special Stock Option Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.



                     [signatures appear on following page]

<PAGE>
                     This Amendment No.2 to the Special Stock Option Agreement
is effective this 31st day of January, 2002.


                                               VON HOFFMANN HOLDINGS INC.


                                               By: /s/ Peter Mitchell
                                                   ----------------------------



                                               ROBERT A. UHLENHOP


                                               /s/ Robert A. Uhlenhop
                                               --------------------------------














                                       2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60342 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus CHARLES MASON WHITLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:94-CR-133 - - - - - - - - - - February 22, 1996 Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Charles Mason Whitley appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute it. 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction and that the district court abused its discretion in not delivering a proffered jury instruction. We have reviewed the record and Whitley's contentions and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, Whitley's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC. 

AND ZTE (TX), INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00487-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00488-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00489-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00490-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00491-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00492-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00493-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00494-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00495-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00496-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00497-ADA

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR IMPROPER VENUE

The Court, having considered Defendants ZTE Corporation’s, ZTE (USA) Inc.’s, and 

ZTE (TX), Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for improper venue, hereby 

ORDERS that this motion is GRANTED, and WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing 

and Development’s Amended Complaint is hereby DISMISSED.

SIGNED AND ENTERED this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.

________________________________

ALAN D. ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 47-8 Filed 12/04/20 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

      ( print page 61150)    
In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following Committee Meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                     Army Science Board (ASB).                

*Date of Meeting:*                     18 October 2000.                

*Time of Meeting:*                     0730-1700.                

*Place:*                     Presidential Towers.                

*Agenda:*                     The Army Science Board's (ASB) Study Group on “Countermine” will meet to have subgroup briefings and overall group discussion on October 18.. This meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 552b(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., specifically subparagraph (1) thereof, and Title 5, U.S.C., Appendix 2, subsection 10(d). (Please see attached Agendas.) The classified preclude opening any portion of this meeting. For further information, please contact Ms. Debbie Butler at (703) 601-1552.                

Wayne Joyner,

Program Support Specialist, Army Science Board.

## Army Science Board Countermine Study—Presidential Towers, Crystal City, VA, 18 October 2000.

### Agenda

0800-0900—Introduction—CLASSIFIED—Frank Kendall

0900-0945—Wide Area Surveillance—CLASSIFIED—Dr. Irene Peden

0945-1030—Maneuver Unit Support and Route Clearing—CLASSIFIED—Joanna Lau

1030-1115—Physical Security and Humanitarian Demining—CLASSIFIED—Buddy Beck

1115-1230—LUNCH

1230-1315—Breaching—CLASSIFIED—Dr. Luyten

1315-1415—Basic Research and Phenomenology—CLASSIFIED—Dr. Canavan

1415-1515—Open Discussion/Closing Remarks—CLASSIFIED—Frank Kendall

[FR Doc. 00-26416 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Liberatore, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Judgment *956unanimously reversed on the law, motion to suppress granted, plea vacated, and matter remitted to Ontario County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Same memorandum as in *People v Liberatore*([appeal No. 1 ] 167 AD2d 955 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court, Reed, J.—criminal sale of controlled substance, third degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 542 

To eliminate the learned intermediary defense to tort claims based on product 

liability, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2011 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To eliminate the learned intermediary defense to tort claims 

based on product liability, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Protection 

5 Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LEARNED INTERMEDIARY DEFENSE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—It shall not be a defense to any 

8 tort claim in any court in the United States that a manu9 facture of a product has fulfilled that manufacturer’s duty 

10 of care when the manufacturer provides all of the necVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:44 Feb 10, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H542.IH H542

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 542 IH

1 essary information to a learned intermediary who then 

2 interacts with the consumer of the product. 

3 (b) DEFINITION.—In this section— 

4 (1) the term ‘‘learned intermediary’’ means a 

5 person, licenced under applicable State or Federal 

6 law, to advise a consumer whether or not to use the 

7 product in question; and 

8 (2) the term ‘‘State’’ includes the District of 

9 Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any other common10 wealth, possession, or territory of the United States. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 115TH DISTRICT COURT OF MARION COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 25th 

day of February, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Skie Jordan Smith, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00071-CR

Trial Court No. F14369

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Skie Jordan Smith, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 29th day of May, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5516 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5516

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Vinyl acetate-Alkeneoic acid 
                               Copolymer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Walberg introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Vinyl acetate-Alkeneoic acid 
                               Copolymer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VINYL ACETATE-ALKENEOIC ACID COPOLYMER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Vinyl acetate-      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Alkeneoic acid                                                    12/31/2015
                          Copolymer (CAS
                          No. 25609-89-6)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3905.19.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# OAR Box 1170 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 87 ) INDE X Docket Number: 

# A-88-2 4

Printed 4/30/200810:49:06

AM Sheet 87 of 182 P. 1P. 2

DocketNumberA-8 8 -2 4 Categor yIII- A DocumentNumberDescriptio n III-A- 1 Notic e o fPropose d Rulemakin g III-A- 2 

# li) . 

# 1 Notic e o fTechnica l Amendmen t 

# seiiwii D tttf|6 » li l EP AAI R DOCKE

TP. 3

DOCKET : A-88^2 4 CATEGORY : IV- D

NUMBE R IV-^O l IV-^0 2 IV^D-^0 3 IV^D-04 IV-^0 5 IV^-D-06 IV-^D-^0 7 DAT EREC'D AI RDOCKE T 03^27^8 9 05-^15^8 9 05-^16-8 9 05^16^8 9 07^14-^8 9 07^17^8 9 07-28-^8 9 Correspondenc e Receive d Fro m Person s Outsid e th e Agenc y
DAT E O F COMMENTE RO R ADDRESSEE , TITLE , DESCRIPTION , ETC . DOCUMEN T Kec o R& D Inc. , Charle s L . Kimbell ; Lette r w/attach . 03-^23-^8 9 Diamon d Shamrock , Alla n A . Grigg s 05-*12-*8 9 Commonwealt ho f Pennsylvani a Departmen t o f 05-^09^8 9 Environmenta l Resources , Be n A . Brodovic z Tosc o Corporation , Michae l M . DeLeo n 05-17^8 9 Ohi o Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , 07-^12-^8 9 Patrici a P . Walling ; Lette r w/attachmen t Chevro n U.S.A. , Inc. , W.E . Dun n 07^11-^8 9 Texac o Inc. , Fran k W . Mille r 07^25-8 9P. 4

Docke t Numbe r A-88-2 4 Categor yIV- H Amendment s t o Subpar t J and Additio n o f Performanc e Specificatio n 7 t o Appendi xB Documen t Numbe r IV-H- 1 Descriptio n Re d Borde r Revie wPackag e

1D j i—— — ! 

### ! S AP R 2 3 199 0 li) l EP AAI R DOCKE T

^^J.T"-^r * -• IVCf.-rj^T.- 'P. 5

Docke t Numbe r A-88-2 4 Categor yV- A Amendment s t o Subpar t J and Additio n o f Performanc e Specificatio n 7 t o Appendi xB 

### ' 1

Documen t Numbe r V-A- 1 V-A- 2 Descriptio n Notic e o f Fina l Rulemakin g FRCorrectio n Notic e
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              209
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          233
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
                                               


</TABLE>