SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST 

(In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V) 

SIP Submitted by: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 

Date Submitted: September 24, 2012 

Subject: 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard 110(a)(2) Infrastructure SIP 

Completeness Review 

Completed by: Ruth Knapp J$~ Date Completed: January 29,2013 

Administrative Materials 

ACCEPTABLE 

- - -

I· EPA REQUIREMENT I STATE SUBMITTAL I (X) I 

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his 1. SIP transmittal letter dated September 24, 2012 from X 

designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision Michael L. Krancer, Secretary PADEP to Shawn M. 

thereof. Garvin of EPA. - 2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code 2. Applicable portions of 11 O(a)(2) are found in the PA X 

pr body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent SIP at 40 CFR Part 52 or in the state code/body of 

~greement in final form. That evidence shall include the date regulations. 

of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the 

tplan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. 

Check to see if the regulation, permit, order or consent decree 

has a sunset or expiration date. If so it is not acceptable as a 

SIP submission. 

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority 3. Pennsylvania's Air Pollution Control Act provides X 

under State law to adopt and impJement the plan. authority to adopt and implement the plan. 

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for 4. The infrastructure submittal which references other 

~pproval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including rules already in the SIP is dated September 2012. X 

~ndicatio.n of the changes made to the existing approved plan, 
--- -

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) 

!Where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official 

State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the 

~ppropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable 

by the State. The effective date ofthe regulation/document 

shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. _ 

15. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural 5. Yes the transmittal letter and additional materials X 

requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting indicate that Pennsylvania followed the procedural 

I and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. requirements for adoption of the plan. 

6 Public notice dated June 9, 2012 indicated a public comment 

16. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed period lasting until July 13, 2012 was provided. X 

i change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including 

the date of publication of such notice. 

17. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance 7. Yes a public hearing was held as per the public notice of the X 

with the information provided in the public notice and the hearing and comment period. 

State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response 8. Public comments and the Commonwealth's response are X 

hereto. included. 

Technical Materials 

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affect~d by the plan. 1 The plan pertains to Lead. X 

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including 2. Generally the plan affects sources statewide and a map of X 

the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations lead sources is provided. 

1

and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 

13. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions 3. No changes will occur to emissions since no new regulations X 

from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current are included in this plan. 

~ctual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, 

quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected 

1 sources through calculations of the differences between certain 

baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result 

of the revision. 

,14. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air 4. Since the plan does not modify emissions it will not effect X 
EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) 

quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration these items. As applicable, air protection programs are certified 

increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and and discussed in the plan. 

rvisibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved 

~d implemented. 

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed 

5 No actual modeling is required but the ability to do modeling 

is discussed in the plan under element K. x 

trevision, including input data, output data, models used, 

!ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, 

~ustification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of 

models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the I 

determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are 6 This information is found in the Pennsylvania SIP under X 

based on continuous emission reduction technology. applicable portions of 40 CPR Part 52. I 

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 7. This information is found in the Pennsylvania SIP under X 

practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, applicable portions of 40 CPR Part 52. I 

!Where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how 8 This information is found in the Pennsylvania 1 SIP under X 

jcompliance will be determined in practice. applicable portions of 40 CPR Part 52. I 

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by 9.NA 

any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, 

explain why.) . 

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a 10.NA 

maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant I 

NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.