# EMISSIONS TESTING FOR THE

WOOL FIBERGLASS MANUFACTURING MACT ICR

ON THE

MELT FURNACE (EU 002)



# OWENS CORNING INSULATING SYSTEMS, LLC

DECEMBER 20-22, 2011

PROJECT NO.: 511250

Prepared for


# OWENS CORNING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, LLC

2222 West Bella Vista Street

Lakeland, Florida 33810-0601



# ENTEC SERVICES, INC.

30 Monroe Drive Pelham, Alabama 35124 (205) 358-1011

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 2 of 20 

# EMISSIONS TESTING FOR THE

WOOL FIBERGLASS MANUFACTURING MACT ICR

ON THE

MELT FURNACE (EU 002)


# OWENS CORNING INSULATING SYSTEMS, LLC

DECEMBER 20-22, 2011

PROJECT NO.: 511250

I certify that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained herein. Based on my inquiries of the individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, I believe the contents of this report deliverable to be true, accurate, and complete, to the best of my knowledge.

Entec Project No. 511250 Report Submitted: February 1, 2012

Completed By: Reviewed By:

_________________________ __________________________ 

## W. Keith Poole Manager, Reporting Division Troy Burrows QA / QC Manager

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 3 of 20 

# TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................... 6

2.0 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS .......................................................................... 7

2.1 SAMPLING ISSUES AND METHOD DEVIATIONS .................................. 7

3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ................................................................................. 10

4.0 REFERENCE METHOD TEST PROCEDURES ................................................. 11

4.1 US EPA REFERENCE TEST METHOD 1 -TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT ................................................................ 11 4.2 US EPA REFERENCE TEST METHOD 2 – VELOCITY ......................... 11 4.3 US EPA REFERENCE TEST METHOD 3 – DRY GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT (CARBON DIOXIDE) ................................................................ 11 4.4 US EPA REFERENCE TEST METHOD 4 – MOISTURE CONTENT ..... 12 4.5 US EPA REFERENCE TEST METHOD 5 WITH 29- PARTICULATE AND METALS. ......................................................................................... 12 4.6 SW-846 DETERMINATION OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES ...................................... 13

5.0 QA / QC PROCEDURES..................................................................................... 18

6.0 CALIBRATION PROCEDURES .......................................................................... 20

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 4 of 20 

# LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX PAGE

A RAW TEST DATA AND EMISSION CALCULATIONS MELT FURNACE (EU 002) – US EPA METHODS 1 – 4, 5/29 AND 0061 ........... 1

A.1 US EPA METHODS 1 - 4, 5/29 .................................................................... 2 A.2 US EPA METHOD 0061 ............................................................................ 19

B QA/QC DOCUMENTS AND CHECKLISTS ......................................................... 36

C LABORATORY DATA ......................................................................................... 50

C.1 ENTHALPY REPORT #1211-69 – METHOD 5 MULTIPLE METALS AND PM ......................................................... 51 C.2 ELEMENT ONE REPORT #18035 – METHOD 29 CHROMIUM ................................................................................... 66 C.3 ELEMENT ONE REPORT #17933 – METHOD 0061 – TOTAL CHROMIUM AND HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM ..................................... 95

D CALIBRATION DATA ........................................................................................ 135

E QSTI CERTIFICATIONS ................................................................................... 140

F SAMPLE CALCULATIONS AND NOMENCLATURE ........................................ 145

G EPA ICR DOCUMENTS .................................................................................... 149

G.1 EPA LETTER AND ENCLOSURES 1 AND 2 ........................................ 150

H CONFIDENTIAL PRODUCTION DATA (submitted separately by CD) ...................

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 5 of 20 

# LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE

2-1 EMISSIONS SUMMARY – METHOD 29 ............................................................... 8

2-2 EMISSIONS SUMMARY – METHOD 0061 ........................................................... 9



# LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE PAGE

4-1 TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT .............................................................................. 15

4-2 METHOD 5 / 29 SAMPLE TRAIN DIAGRAM ...................................................... 16

4-3 METHOD 0061 SAMPLE TRAIN DIAGRAM ....................................................... 17

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 6 of 20 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In October of 2011 the U. S. Environmen tal Protection Agency (US EPA) issued an Information Collection Request (ICR) to Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC. Within the Fiberglass Manufacturing ICR, Enclosure 2 specified the emission sources and pollutants that were required to be tested. Table 1.2 presented a Summary of Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing Source Test Methods and Alternate Methods and specified the test methods and parameters for each pollutant to be tested. These enclosures are included as attachments to this report and can be located in Appendix G.

Testing was conducted at Owens Corning Insulation LLC, Lakeland facility on December 20-22, 2011 by Mr. Stewart Meadows, Mr. Flavel Smith (Gabby), Mr. Andrew Imes and Mr. Ed Brown of Entec Services, Inc. Representing OC IS was Mr. Rick Cooper who coordinated testing with plant production personnel.

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 7 of 20 2.0 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS

Emission testing was conducted on the furnace stack for filterable particulate and total chromium per US EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 3a, 4, 5 and 29 of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A. Method 0061 of “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods” was utilized to quantify Hexavalent chromium (CR +6 

## ) and total chromium.

2.1 SAMPLING ISSUES AND METHOD DEVIATIONS

In section 7.4 of Method 0061, it states that the sample should be filtered through a 0.45 micron acetate filter immediately following recovery to remove any insoluble material. This procedure was inadvertently not done by the field crew but was completed in the lab. The samples were received cold and basic by Element One.

No difficulties or problems were encountered during sampling on the furnace stack. The emissions test summaries on the following pages provide a detailed summary of each test.

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 8 of 20 Test Performed For: Testing Performed By:
Carolinas Division

Source(s) Tested: Project Manager:
Test Condition: Flavel Smith Test(s) Performed:

Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

Date of Run 12/20/11 12/21/11 12/22/11

-

Emission Test Run Time Began - Ended 1253-1713 1320-1737 1225-1632

-

102.04 97.84 100.13 100.00

122 129 125 125

2.53 2.74 2.67 2.65

45.78 47.32 47.05 46.72
3,960 4,004 4,012 3,992
4,330 4,475 4,450 4,418
3,859 3,894 3,905 3,886



### Particulate Concentration gr/dscf 1.26E-03 2.74E-03 9.42E-04 1.65E-03

Particulate Concentration mg/m3 2.88 6.27 2.16 3.77

Particulate Concentration mg/m3 @ 7% O 2 

### 57.14 124.53 42.82 74.83

Particulate Emissions Lbs/Hr 4.16E-02 9.15E-02 3.15E-02 5.49E-02
Vaporous Chromium Concentration gr/dscf 1.59E-07 8.77E-08 4.98E-08 9.88E-08
Vaporous Chromium Concentration mg/m3 3.64E-04 2.01E-04 1.14E-04 2.26E-04 Vaporous Chromium Concentration mg/m3 @ 7% O2 7.22E-03 3.98E-03 2.26E-03 4.49E-03 Vaporous Chromium Emissions Lbs/Hr 5.26E-06 2.93E-06 1.67E-06 3.28E-06

Filterable Chromium Concentration gr/dscf 2.79E-07 1.72E-07 1.41E-07 1.97E-07

Filterable Chromium Concentration mg/m3 6.38E-04 3.93E-04 3.23E-04 4.52E-04 Filterable Chromium Concentration mg/m3 @ 7% O2 1.27E-02 7.81E-03 6.42E-03 8.97E-03

Filterable Chromium Emissions Lbs/Hr 

### 9.22E-06 5.73E-06 4.73E-06 6.56E-06

Total Chromium Concentration gr/dscf 4.38E-07 2.59E-07 1.91E-07 2.97E-07

Total Chromium Concentration mg/m3 1.00E-03 5.94E-04 4.37E-04 6.79E-04

Total Chromium Concentration mg/m3 @ 7% O2 1.99E-02 1.18E-02 8.69E-03 1.35E-02

Total Chromium Emissions Lbs/Hr 1.45E-05 8.66E-06 6.40E-06 9.88E-06 Stack Gas Flow, ACFM Stack Temperature, o F

Stack Gas Flow, SCFM Stack Gas Velocity, F/S Moisture Content, % volume 

# Table 2-1 Emissions Summary

Volumetric Flow Rate, DSCFM 

### Owens Corning Lakeland Plant Lakeland, FL

Section 114 Testing Melt Furnace (EU 002)

Method 29 Total Chromium and Filterable Particulate

Isokinetic Sampling Rate, %Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLCProject No. 511250Page9of20Test Performed For:Testing Performed By:Carolinas DivisionSource(s) Tested:Project Manager:Test Condition:Flavel SmithTest(s) Performed:Run NumberRun 1Run 2Run 3AverageDate of Run12/20/11 12/21/11 12/22/11-Emission Test Run Time Began - Ended0810-1215 0751-1223 0747-1153-102.99102.49103.04102.841111271261214.545.427.535.8345.5846.0446.8546.164,0193,9133,9853,9724,3114,3544,4314,3653,8363,7013,6853,741Hexavalent Chromium Concentrationgr/dscf2.42E-07 1.20E-06 1.20E-075.20E-07Hexavalent Chromium Concentrationmg/m35.54E-04 2.74E-03 2.74E-041.19E-03Hexavalent Chromium Concentration mg/m3 @ 7% O21.15E-02 4.89E-02 7.20E-032.25E-02Hexavalent Chromium EmissionsLbs/Hr7.95E-06 1.05E-06 4.60E-073.16E-06Total Chromium Concentrationgr/dscf2.65E-06 1.20E-06 1.20E-071.32E-06Total Chromium Concentrationmg/m36.07E-03 2.74E-03 2.74E-043.03E-03Total Chromium Concentrationmg/m3 @ 7% O2 1.26E-01 4.89E-02 7.20E-036.07E-02Total Chromium EmissionsLbs/Hr8.72E-05 3.80E-05 3.79E-064.30E-05=DLL (detection level limited)Table 2-2Emissions SummaryFurnaceHex/Total Chrome per method 0061Isokinetic Sampling Rate, %Volumetric Flow Rate, DSCFMOwens Corning Lakeland PlantLakeland, FLSection 114 TestingStack Temperature,oFStack Gas Flow, SCFMStack Gas Velocity, F/SMoisture Content, % volumeStack Gas Flow, ACFM

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 10 of 20 3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION

Raw Material Handling (Emission Unit (EU) 001)

Raw materials are delivered via rail car or truck for large volume supplies and in drums or bags for smaller volume supplies. Pneumatic and vibrator/gravity systems are used to unload the bulk raw materials to silos, with two common bin vent fabric filters. Bulk raw materials are gravity-fed through a fabric tube to a weigh station and then dropped to a mixer for blending. These operations take place inside the manufacturing building.

Particulate matter (PM/PM10) emissions from raw material handling operations (EU 001) are controlled by two Model No. 49S-8- 20-TR-B Mikropul–Mikro-Pulsaire Bin Vent fabric filter baghouses each with a design gas flow rate of 2,800 acfm; and one (1) Model 16AVS6 AirLanco Bin Vent fabric filter baghouse with a design gas flow rate of 1,250 acfm.

Melting (EU 002) – Melting Furnace

After weighing and mixing, the raw materials are conveyed pneumatically to the two (2) cold top electric melting furnaces where molten glass is formed. The molten glass leaves the furnace and passes through the enclosed riser and the forehearth where it is cooled to the proper temperature for forming.

Particulate matter (PM/PM10) emissions from raw material transfer to and operation of the two (2) melting furnaces (EU 002) are controlled by two (2) Model No. 64S-8-20-TR-B Mikropul–Mikro-Pulsaire high temperature fabric filter baghouses (one for each furnace), each with a design gas flow rate of 3,600 acfm.

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 11 of 20 4.0 REFERENCE METHOD TEST PROCEDURES

Emission rates were determined using US EPA Reference Test Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 29 of US EPA 40 CFR 60, Appendix A and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods Method 0061. Calibration and quality assurance procedures of US EPA 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A and the “Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement System” Volume III Stationary Source-Specific Methods were followed throughout the duration of field and laboratory testing for all methods. The most current version for each method (as described in the Federal Register) was used.

4.1 US EPA REFERENCE TEST METHOD 1 - TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT

For Information on stack dimensions, traverse points, distance to disturbance and other relevant data, refer to the drawing presented in Figure 4-1, “Stack Drawing and Traverse Point

Location”.

4.2 US EPA REFERENCE TEST METHOD 2 – VELOCITY

The velocity of the gas stream was determined according to US EPA Reference Method 2 by reading the instantaneous velocity head with an inclined manometer at each sampling pointwith a calibrated S-type pitot. The stack pressure was measured with the static side of an Stype pitot tube. A calibrated pyrometer was used to measure stack temperature at each sampling point. All test data, worksheets, and spreadsheets presenting the calculations are included in Appendix A. Calibration procedures for the velocity equipment are located in Section 6.0 of this report. Pitot tube, thermocouple, and other measurement device calibration worksheets used for the test series are presented in Appendix D.

4.3 US EPA REFERENCE TEST METHOD 3 - DRY GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT-CARBON DIOXIDE

Dry Gas molecular weight (carbon dioxide) was determined using US EPA Reference Test Method 3 (Fyrite Method). A sample of the flue gas was extracted from the gas stream during each test. These samples were analyzed with a Fyrite gas analyzer. The molecular weight of the gas was calculated using the moisture, oxygen and carbon dioxide content, and the measured stack gas temperature.

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 12 of 20 4.4 US EPA REFERENCE TEST METHOD 4 - MOISTURE CONTENT

The moisture content used for calculating the gas stream flow rate was determined by measuring the moisture in a series of glass impi ngers and silica gel impin ger gravimetrically with an analytical balance with a tolerance of 0.1 g. The volume of gas drawn was corrected to dry standard conditions. The dry gas meter and thermocouple calibration forms are contained in Appendix I.

4.5 US EPA REFERENCE TEST METHOD 5 WITH METHOD 29 – PARTICULATE AND
METALS DETERMINATION

The particulate/multiple metals sample train consisted of a heated stainless steel sample probe with a glass liner equipped with an S-type pitot tube and thermocouple. The probe was attached to a sample module consisting of a heated filter compartment, which houses the in-line filter holder equipped with a pre-weighed quartz filter for the collection of the particulate, and a series of glass impingers to collect metals and determine moisture. The sample module was connected to a control module by means of an um bilical cord. The control module consisted of a dry gas meter, calibrated orifice, leak free pump, two inclined manometers, and temperature controllers for the heated filter compartment, the probe, and a thermocouple indicator to monitor the required temperatures during the testing.

Gas samples were collected as follows: the sample gas was drawn through the sampling probe isokinetically and passed through a 3-inch quartz filter on to which particulate matter was deposited. The sample gas was then passed through a series of ice-cooled impingers. The first and second impingers contained exactly 100 ml each of an absorbing solution (5% HNO 3 

## 10%

H 2 

## O 2 

## ). The third impinger was empty. The fourth impinger contained exactly 250 g of silica gel, which absorbed any remaining moisture. These impingers were placed in an ice-bath to maintain a maximum exit temperature of < 68 o 

## F. The sample gas then passed through a vacuum pump followed by a dry gas meter. The dry gas meter integrated the sample gas flow throughout the duration of the test. A calibrated orifice attached to the outlet of the dry gas meter provided real time flow rate data.

A representative gas sample was acquired by sampling for equal periods of time at the centroid of a number of equal area regions in the exhaust stack. The sampling rate was adjusted at each test point maintaining an isokinetic sampling condition.

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 13 of 20 After the sampling was complete, the filter was removed and placed in a storage container. The nozzle, probe liner, and inlet side of the filter holder were quantitatively washed with exactly 100 ml of reagent grade acetone and stored in a marked and sealed container. The nozzle, probe liner, and inlet side of the filter holder were rinsed again with 0.1N HNO 3 

## and placed into another marked and sealed container. The nozzle and probe liner were then rinsed with DI water and followed by another acetone rinse. These rinses were not retained and were a QA/QC step to ensure clean glassware prior to starting another run. The liquids from the first and second impingers were weighed and added to a third marked and sealed container. The back half of the filter holder and these two impi ngers were rinsed with exactly 100 ml of 0.1N
HNO 3 

## and the rinses were added to the same container. The contents of the third impinger were weighed and then rinsed with exactly 100 ml of 0.1N HNO 3 

## and the rinses were placed in a fourth marked and sealed container. All the samples were shipped to Enthalpy Analytical for particulate analysis. Enthalpy sub-contracted the metals analysis to Element One of Wilmington, NC for metals analysis. The fourth impinger was weighed to determine moisture catch of the silica gel.

4.6 SW-846 DETERMINATION OF HEXA VALENT CHROMIUM EMISSIONS FROM
STATIONARY SOURCES

SCOPE AND APPLICATION This method provides procedures for the determination of hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) emissions from hazardous waste incinerators, m unicipal waste incinerators, municipal waste combustors, and sewage sludge incinerators. With the approval of the Administrator, this method may also be used to measure total chromium. The sampling train, constructed of Teflon components, has only been evaluated at temperatures of less than 300 o 

## F. Trains constructed of other materials, for testing at higher temperatures, are currently being evaluated.

Range: If employing a preconcentration procedure, the lower limit of the detection range can be extended to 16 nanograms per dry standard cubic meter (ng/dscm) with a 3 dscm gas sample (0.1 ppb in solution). With sample dilution, there is no upper limit. Follow your manufacturer's specific instructions on employing the preconcentration procedure for these analyses.

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 14 of 20 SUMMARY OF METHOD

For incinerators and combustors, the Cr +6 

## emissions are collected isokinetically from the source: To eliminate the possibility of Cr +6 

## reduction between the nozzle and impinger, the emission samples are collected with a recirculatory train where the impinger reagent is continuously recirculated to the nozzle. Recovery procedures include a post-sampling purge and filtration. The impinger train samples are analyzed for Cr +6 

## by an ion chromatograph equipped with a post-column reactor and a visible wavelength detector. The IC/PCR separates
the Cr +6 

## as chromate (CrO 4 = 

## ) from other diphenylcarbazide reactions that occur in the postcolumn reactor. To increase sensitivity for trac e levels of chromium, a preconcentration system may also be used in conjunction with the IC/PCR.

INTERFERENCES

Components in the sample matrix may cause Cr +6 

## to convert to trivalent chromium (Cr +3 

## ) or cause Cr +3 

## to convert to Cr +6 

## . A post-sampling nitrogen purge and sample filtration are included to eliminate many of these interferences.

The chromatographic separation of Cr +6 

## using ion chromatography reduces the potential for other metals to interfere with the post-column reaction. For the IC/PCR analysis, only compounds that coelute with Cr +6 

## and affect the diphenylcarbazide reaction will cause
interference.

Sample cross-contamination that can occur when high-level and low-level samples or standards are analyzed alternately is eliminated by thorough purging of the sample loop. Purging can easily be obtained by increasing the injection volume of the samples to ten times the size of the sample loop.

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 15 of 20 Client: Job No. :

Source: Input By:

P Port Type Nipple Port Diameter

17

80

Inches Duct Diameters

154.0 9.06

240.0 14.12 4 4

Point No.

1 1.1 7.1

2 4.3 10.3

3 12.8 18.8

4 15.9 21.9

* Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch * Adjusted points diameter < 24" no point closer than 0.5 inch

Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 ; 4 points per port if the 8 / 2 diameters downstream and upstream criteria is met. Furnace

Distance "A"



### Distance "B" 2

6.00

Total Number of Traverse Points:

Number of Points per port / traverse: Number of Ports:

Length of Port, inches:

Inches Inside Stack Outside Nipple
Inches 8 

# Figure 4-1 Entec Services, Inc

30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124

Stack Area, Ft 2 : Stack Diameter, inches:

Stack Properties: Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate (P): 

### STACK DRAWING & TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION

511250 Stewart Meadows

4

1.576 Owens Corning Lakeland Plant

Stack Height, feet:

Upstream From Flow Disturbance (A):

Downstream From Flow Disturbance (B):

INCHES 

### 17.0 INCHES

INCHES



### 240.0 154.0

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 16 of 20Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLCProject No. 511250Page17of20

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 18 of 20 5.0 QA / QC PROCEDURES

Specific Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA / QC) procedures were adhered to during this test project to provide valid and scientifically defensible data. For any environmental field and laboratory measurement, a degree of uncertainty exists in the data due to inherent limitations of the measurement sy stems employed. Entec Services, Inc. objective of the QA / QC program is to produce data of known precis ion, accuracy, representation, completeness, and comparability. Special Entec-designed QA/QC checklists are contained in Appendix B.

For purposes of the ICR, US EPA outlined procedures for quantifying measured values below the detection limit in Enclosure 2, Section 2.2. Identify the status of measured values relative to detection levels on the spreadsheet or in the ERT using the following descriptions:

• BDL (below detection level) – all analytical values used to calculate and report an instack emissions value are less than the laboratory’s reported detection level(s);

• DLL (detection level limited) – at least one but not all values used to calculate and report an in-stack emissions value are less than the laboratory’s reported detection level(s); or

• ADL (above detection level) – all analytical values used to calculate and report an instack emissions value are greater than the laboratory’s reported detection level(s).

For each reported emissions value, insert the appropriate flag (BDL, DLL, or ADL) in the

Notes line of Excel emission test spreadsheet template or in the Comments line of the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT).

When reporting and calculating individual test run data: • For analytical data reported from the lab as “nondetect” or “below detection level;”

− Include a brief description of the procedures used to determine the analytical detection

and in-stack detection levels:
o In the Notes line of Excel emission test spreadsheet template; or

o In the Comments line of Lab Data tab in the Run Data Details in the ERT.

− Describe these procedures completely in a separate attachment including the measurements made, the standards used, and the statistical procedures applied.

− Calculate in-stack emissions rate for any analytical measurement below detection level using the relevant detection level as the “real” value.

− Report the calculated emissions concentration or rate result:

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 19 of 20 o As a bracketed “less than” detection level value (e.g., [<0.0105]) in the Excel emission test spreadsheet template and include the appropriate flag in the Notes line; or o As a “real” value in the ERT with the appropriate flag in the Comments line.

− Report as “real” values (i.e., no brackets or < symbol) any analytical data measured above the detection level including any data between the analytical detection level and a laboratory-specific reporting or quantification level (i.e., flag as ADL).

• For pollutant measurements composed of mu ltiple components or fractions (e.g., Hg and other metals sampling trains) when the result for the value for any component is measured below the analytical detection level:

− Calculate in-stack emissions rate or concentrations as outlined above for each component or fraction;

− Sum the measured and detection level values as outlined above using the in-stack emissions rate or concentrations for all of the components or fractions; and

− Report the sum of all components or fractions: o As a bracketed “less than” detection level value (e.g., [<0.0105]) in the Excel emission test spreadsheet template and include the appropriate flag in the Notes line; or o As a “real” value in the ERT with the appropriate flag in the Comments line.

− Report also the individual component or fraction values for each run if the Excel emission test spreadsheet template or ERT format allows; if not (i.e., the format allows reporting only a single sum value):

o For the Excel emission test spreadsheet template, next to the sum reported as above report in the Notes line the appropriate flag along with the values for the measured or detection level value for each component or fraction as used in the calculations (e.g., 0.036, [<0.069], 1.239, [<0.945] for a four fraction sample).

o For the ERT, next to the sum reported as above, report on the Comments line the appropriate flag and the measured or detection level value for each

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC Project No. 511250 Page 20 of 20 6.0 CALIBRATION PROCEDURES

All of the emission testing equipment used was calibrated according to the procedures outlined in the EPA 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix “A” and the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems , Volume III, EPA-600/4-94-038b. Complete calibration records are located in the appendix of this report.

# APPENDIX A

RAW TEST DATA AND EMI SSIONS CALCULATIONS

MELT FURNACE (EU 002)

US EPA METHODS 1-4, 5/29 AND 0061

# APPENDIX A.1

RAW TEST DATA AND EMI SSIONS CALCULATIONS

MELT FURNACE (EU 002)

US EPA METHODS 1-4, 5/29

### EPA Method 1

EPA Method 2

EPA Method 3

EPA Method 4

EPA Method 5/29

12/20/11 12/21/11 12/22/11 

# SOURCE OVERVIEW

Sample Location 0.1N NaOH

PM & Metals (Total Cr) SOURCE(S) SHAPE: Circular 

# Entec Services, Inc.

SOURCE OWNER:

PLANT LOCATION:

SOURCE(S) CONDITION: Owens Corning Lakeland Plant

Section 114 Testing Lakeland, FL

SOURCE(S) NAME(S): Furnace

Rick Cooper REFERENCE METHOD TESTS:

Moisture Content Molecular Weight

Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST - ASSISTANT Kyle Vaughan

ENTEC PROJECT NUMBER: DATES TESTS CONDUCTED:

511250 RULING AGENCY : ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST - ASSISTANT Stewart Meadows PROBE WASH CHEMICAL:

Volumetric Flow

PROJECT MANAGER Flavel Smith TEST PERFORMED: Method 29 Total Chromium

ADDITIONAL TEST REQUIREMENTS: Minimum Run Time (240 minutes) SOURCE PERMIT NUMBER: FDEP 1050375-006-AOClient:

Source:
Symbol Units

- - 1 2 3A V E R A G E

- - 12/20/11 12/21/11 12/22/11

- Military Time 1253-1713 1320-1737 1225-1632

 minutes 240 240 240 240

A s Ft 2 1.576 1.576 1.576

P ba r in. Hg 30.22 29.91 29.91 30.01

P g in. H 2 0 -0.37 -0.37 -0.37 -0.37

Pitot Tube Correction factor C p - 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Meter Correction Factor Y - 0.937 0.937 0.937 0.937

 H@ in. H 2 0 2.002 2.002 2.002 2.002

D n inches 0.220 0.220 0.220 0.220

V m dcf 173.663 170.940 175.499 173.367

t m o F 90.0 93.9 94.1 92.7

 H in. H 2 0 1.49 1.53 1.55 1.52

W imp grams 55.0 65.0 65.0 61.7

W sg grams 32.4 26.5 26.4 28.4

O 2 % 20.2 20.2 20.2 20.2

CO 2 % 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.9

(sqrt  P) avg (in. H 2 0) 1/2 0.777 0.794 0.793 0.788

t s o F 122.4 129.1 124.6 125.4

Cr mg C r 0.0045 0.0026 0.0019 0.0030

m n mg 12.9 27.2 9.6 16.6 

# ENTEC Services, Inc.

INPUT TEST DATA

Field Data Test Data Data Input By: 511250

Stewart Meadows Job No.:

Emission Test Run Time Began - Ended
Sampling Time Owens Corning Lakeland Plant

Furnace

Stack Area Run Number

Test Date

Meter Volume

Meter Temperature
Avg. Orifice Delta H
Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) Barometric Pressure

Stack Static Pressure

Meter Delta H @

Nozzle Diameter

Total Chromium Collected Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture)
Oxygen Concentration, dry basis
Carbon Dioxide Concentration, dry basis 

### 30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124

Filterable Particulate Collected Avg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P

Stack TemperatureClient: Owens Corning Lakeland Plant 511250

Source: Furnace
Formulas Symbol Units

- - 1 2 3A V E R A G E

- - 12/20/11 12/21/11 12/22/11

- Military Time 1253-1713 1320-1737 1225-1632

1. Stack Pressure = P ba r + P g / 13.6 P s in. Hg 30.19 29.88 29.88 29.99

2. Meter Pressure = P ba r +  H / 13.6 P m in. Hg 30.33 30.02 30.02 30.13

3. Standard Meter Volume = 17.64* Y* (V m /T m )* (P ba r +  H / 13.6) V m(std) dscf 158.287 153.150 157.184 156.207
4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed =0.04706*W imp V wc(std) scf 2.588 3.059 3.059 2.902

4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel =0.04715*W s g V wsg(std) scf 1.528 1.249 1.245 1.341

5. Moisture Fraction =(V wc ( std ) + V ws g( std ) )/(V wc ( std ) + V ws g( std ) + V m ( std ) ) B ws fraction 0.0253 0.0274 0.0267 0.0265
6. Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (Theoretical) =10 [6.37-(2827/(ts+460-95.2)] /P s TB ws fraction 0.1223 0.1483 0.1313 0.1340
7. Standard Water Volume @ Saturation (Theoretical) =V m ( std ) * (TB ws )/(1-TB ws ) TV W(std) scf 22.063 26.659 23.767 24.163
8. Volume of Water @ Saturation (Theoretical) =TV w ( std ) /0.04707 TV lc ml 468.7 566.4 504.9 513.3
9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis = 0.32*(O 2 )+ 0.44*(CO 2 )+0.28*(100-(O 2 )-(CO 2 )) M d g/g-mole 28.920 28.952 28.968 28.947
10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis = M d *(1-B ws )+18.0*(B ws ) M s g/g-mole 28.643 28.652 28.676 28.657
11. Average Stack Gas Velocity = 85.49*C p *(sqrt  P) av g *SQRT((T s ) / (P s *M w )) v s ft/s 45.78 47.32 47.05 46.717

12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions = 60*v s *A s Q a acfm 4,330 4,475 4,450 4,418

13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions = Q a *(T std /T s )*(P s /P std ) Q s scfm 3,960 4,004 4,012 3,992
14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions = Q a *(1-B ws )*(T std /T s )*(P s /P std ) Q std dscfm 3,859 3,894 3,905 3,886

15. Total Chromium concentration @ Std. Conditions =0.01543*m C r /V m ( std ) c sCr gr/dscf 4.38E-07 2.61E-07 1.91E-07 2.97E-07

15. Particulate concentration @ Std. Conditions, Filterable =0.01543*m n /V m ( std ) c s gr/dscf 1.26E-03 2.74E-03 9.42E-04 1.65E-03

21. Total Chromium emissions = (60/7000)*c sCrl *Q sd PMR Cr lb/hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

21. Particulate emissions, Filterable = (60/7000)*c s *Q sd PMR lb/hr 0.04 0.09 0.03 0.05

22. Volume collected through nozzle =T s /P s *[0.002669*V lc + V m *Y*P m /T m ] V n acf 177.587 175.976 179.100 177.554

23. Particulate concentration, @ actual conditions =0.01543*m n /V n c a gr/acf 0.0011 0.0024 0.0008 0.0014
24. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent = 100*Vn / (60*v s *A n *  ) I % 102.04 97.84 100.13 100.00

Post Meter Orifice Cal. (EMC ALT-009 Yqa) y q a 0.9073 0.9426 0.9246 0.9248

1.30% % Difference, (Calibration must be within 5% of original Y-factor) Description Calculated Data

Run Number

Test Date

Emission Test Run Time Began - Ended Data Input By: Stewart Meadows Job No.: 

## ENTEC Services, Inc.

30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124

CALCULATED TEST DATAClient: Test Date: 12/20/2011

Source: Run Number: 1

Traverse Point Delta P Sq. Rt. Delta P Delta H Stack Temp. (°F) Meter Temp. (°F)

1-1 0.68 0.8246 1.66 128 84

1-1 0.71 0.8426 1.73 121 84

1-1 0.72 0.8485 1.76 119 84

1-2 0.72 0.8485 1.76 126 85

1-2 0.72 0.8485 1.76 126 86

1-2 0.71 0.8426 1.73 129 87

1-3 0.55 0.7416 1.34 128 88

1-3 0.55 0.7416 1.34 129 89

1-3 0.55 0.7416 1.34 126 90

1-4 0.44 0.6633 1.07 123 90

1-4 0.43 0.6557 1.05 121 91

1-4 0.43 0.6557 1.05 118 91

2-1 0.71 0.8426 1.73 121 91

2-1 0.73 0.8544 1.78 119 92

2-1 0.73 0.8544 1.78 119 92

2-2 0.74 0.8602 1.81 120 92

2-2 0.71 0.8426 1.73 124 93

2-2 0.71 0.8426 1.73 126 93

2-3 0.59 0.7681 1.44 129 93

2-3 0.59 0.7681 1.44 127 93

2-3 0.59 0.7681 1.44 126 93

2-4 0.40 0.6325 0.98 108 93

2-4 0.45 0.6708 1.10 114 92

2-4 0.47 0.6856 1.15 117 92

116 92

K-Factor

2.44 0.61 0.7769 1.49 122.4 90.0 

# ENTEC Services, Inc.

Owens Corning Lakeland Plant

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 5/29 Furnace 

### 30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124Client: Test Date: 12/21/2011

Source: Run Number: 2

Traverse Point Delta P Sq. Rt. Delta P Delta H Stack Temp. (°F) Meter Temp. (°F)

1-1 0.68 0.8246 1.65 140 85

1-1 0.69 0.8307 1.67 139 86

1-1 0.67 0.8185 1.62 132 87

1-2 0.66 0.8124 1.60 131 88

1-2 0.67 0.8185 1.62 130 89

1-2 0.67 0.8185 1.62 133 90

1-3 0.58 0.7616 1.40 131 91

1-3 0.58 0.7616 1.40 133 92

1-3 0.58 0.7616 1.40 135 93

1-4 0.54 0.7348 1.31 123 93

1-4 0.53 0.7280 1.28 122 94

1-4 0.53 0.7280 1.28 122 94

2-1 0.72 0.8485 1.74 122 95

2-1 0.72 0.8485 1.74 131 95

2-1 0.72 0.8485 1.74 130 96

2-2 0.69 0.8307 1.67 129 97

2-2 0.69 0.8307 1.67 131 97

2-2 0.67 0.8185 1.62 140 98

2-3 0.63 0.7937 1.52 129 99

2-3 0.63 0.7937 1.52 122 99

2-3 0.63 0.7937 1.52 120 99

2-4 0.58 0.7616 1.40 120 99

2-4 0.56 0.7483 1.36 124 99

2-4 0.56 0.7483 1.36 130 98

K-Factor

2.42 0.63 0.7943 1.53 129.1 93.9 

# ENTEC Services, Inc.

Owens Corning Lakeland Plant

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 5/29 

### 30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124

FurnaceClient: Test Date: 12/22/2011

Source: Run Number: 3

Traverse Point Delta P Sq. Rt. Delta P Delta H Stack Temp. (°F) Meter Temp. (°F)

1-1 0.71 0.8426 1.75 117 88

1-1 0.71 0.8426 1.75 114 89

1-1 0.72 0.8485 1.77 115 90

1-2 0.69 0.8307 1.70 124 90

1-2 0.69 0.8307 1.70 129 91

1-2 0.70 0.8367 1.72 134 92

1-3 0.60 0.7746 1.48 124 92

1-3 0.62 0.7874 1.53 121 93

1-3 0.62 0.7874 1.53 123 93

1-4 0.51 0.7141 1.25 130 94

1-4 0.52 0.7211 1.28 125 94

1-4 0.50 0.7071 1.23 124 95

2-1 0.69 0.8307 1.70 127 95

2-1 0.68 0.8246 1.67 126 95

2-1 0.70 0.8367 1.72 124 95

2-2 0.69 0.8307 1.70 121 96

2-2 0.66 0.8124 1.62 123 97

2-2 0.67 0.8185 1.65 123 97

2-3 0.61 0.7810 1.50 128 97

2-3 0.60 0.7746 1.48 126 97

2-3 0.61 0.7810 1.50 125 97

2-4 0.56 0.7483 1.38 128 97

2-4 0.55 0.7416 1.35 127 97

2-4 0.54 0.7348 1.33 133 97

K-Factor

2.46 0.63 0.7933 1.55 124.6 94.1 

# ENTEC Services, Inc.

Owens Corning Lakeland Plant

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 5/29 

### 30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124

Furnace

# APPENDIX A.2

RAW TEST DATA AND EMI SSIONS CALCULATIONS

MELT FURNACE (EU 002)

US EPA METHODS 0061

### EPA Method 1

EPA Method 2

EPA Method 3

EPA Method 4

SW846 Method 0061

12/20/11 12/21/11 12/22/11 PROBE WASH CHEMICAL:

Volumetric Flow

PROJECT MANAGER Flavel Smith TEST PERFORMED: Hex/Total Chrome per method 0061

ADDITIONAL TEST REQUIREMENTS: Minimum Run Time (240 minutes) SOURCE PERMIT NUMBER: FDEP 1050375-006-AO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST - ASSISTANT Stewart Meadows

ENTEC PROJECT NUMBER: DATES TESTS CONDUCTED:

511250 RULING AGENCY : Rick Cooper REFERENCE METHOD TESTS:

Moisture Content Molecular Weight

Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST - ASSISTANT Kyle Vaughan PLANT LOCATION:

SOURCE(S) CONDITION: Owens Corning Lakeland Plant

Section 114 Testing Lakeland, FL

SOURCE(S) NAME(S): Furnace

Circular 

# Entec Services, Inc.

SOURCE OWNER: 

# SOURCE OVERVIEW

Sample Location 0.1N NaOH

Hex/Total Chrome SOURCE(S) SHAPE:Client:

Source:
Symbol Units

- - 1 2 3A V E R A G E

- - 12/20/11 12/21/11 12/22/11

- Military Time 0810-1215 0751-1223 0747-1153

 minutes 240 240 240 240

A s Ft 2 1.576 1.576 1.576

P ba r in. Hg 30.22 29.91 29.91 30.01

P g in. H 2 0 -0.37 -0.37 -0.37 -0.37

Pitot Tube Correction factor C p - 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Meter Correction Factor Y - 0.937 0.937 0.937 0.937

 H@ in. H 2 0 2.002 2.002 2.002 2.002

D n inches 0.220 0.220 0.220 0.220

V m dcf 170.066 165.361 166.378 167.268

t m o F 76.8 78.1 80.9 78.6 

# ENTEC Services, Inc.

INPUT TEST DATA

Field Data Test Data Data Input By: 511250

Ben Rogers Job No.:

Emission Test Run Time Began - Ended
Sampling Time Owens Corning Lakeland Plant

Furnace

Stack Area Run Number

Test Date

Meter Volume

Meter Temperature Barometric Pressure

Stack Static Pressure

Meter Delta H @

Nozzle Diameter 

### 30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124

 H in. H 2 0 1.47 1.41 1.48 1.45

W imp grams 55.0 147.0 137.0 113.0

W sg grams 105.4 38.5 127.0 90.3

O 2 % 20.23 20.12 20.37 20.24

CO 2 % 0.52 0.92 0.82 0.75
Chromium (VI) mass detected Cr V I ug CrVI 2.49 0.33 0.14 0.99

Total Chromium in 0.1 M HNO3 Cr HNO3 ugCr HNO3 0.81 9.79 0.36 3.65

Total Chromium in 0.5 M KOH Cr KOH ugCr KOH 24.00 1.72 0.685 8.80

Cr total ugCr total 27.304 11.838 1.186 13.4 

## = non-detect
=DLL (detection level limited) Avg. Orifice Delta H
Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture)
Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture)
Oxygen Concentration, dry basis
Carbon Dioxide Concentration, dry basis

Total Chromium mass detectedClient: Owens Corning Lakeland Plant 511250

Source: Furnace
Formulas Symbol Units

- - 1 2 3A V E R A G E

- - 12/20/11 12/21/11 12/22/11

- Military Time 0810-1215 0751-1223 0747-1153

1. Stack Pressure = P ba r + P g / 13.6 P s in. Hg 30.19 29.88 29.88 29.99

2. Meter Pressure = P ba r +  H / 13.6 P m in. Hg 30.33 30.01 30.02 30.12

3. Standard Meter Volume = 17.64* Y* (V m /T m )* (P ba r +  H / 13.6) V m(std) dscf 158.815 152.456 152.613 154.628
4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed =0.04706*W imp V wc(std) scf 2.588 6.918 6.447 5.318

4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel =0.04715*W s g V wsg(std) scf 4.970 1.815 5.988 4.258

5. Moisture Fraction =(V wc ( std ) + V ws g( std ) )/(V wc ( std ) + V ws g( std ) + V m ( std ) ) B ws fraction 0.0454 0.0542 0.0753 0.0583
6. Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (Theoretical) =10 [6.37-(2827/(ts+460-95.2)] /P s TB ws fraction 0.0896 0.1385 0.1366 0.1216
7. Standard Water Volume @ Saturation (Theoretical) =V m ( std ) * (TB ws )/(1-TB ws ) TV W(std) scf 15.625 24.509 24.153 21.429
8. Volume of Water @ Saturation (Theoretical) =TV w ( std ) /0.04707 TV lc ml 331.9 520.7 513.1 455.3
9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis = 0.32*(O 2 )+ 0.44*(CO 2 )+0.28*(100-(O 2 )-(CO 2 )) M d g/g-mole 28.892 28.952 28.946 28.930
10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis = M d *(1-B ws )+18.0*(B ws ) M s g/g-mole 28.398 28.359 28.121 28.293
11. Average Stack Gas Velocity = 85.49*C p *(sqrt  P) av g *SQRT((T s ) / (P s *M w )) v s ft/s 45.58 46.04 46.85 46.156

12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions = 60*v s *A s Q a acfm 4,311 4,354 4,431 4,365

13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions = Q a *(T std /T s )*(P s /P std ) Q s scfm 4,019 3,913 3,985 3,972
14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions = Q a *(1-B ws )*(T std /T s )*(P s /P std ) Q std dscfm 3,836 3,701 3,685 3,741
15 Chromium (VI) concentration @ Std Conditions =0 00001543 * ug C VI /V ( td) c C VI gr/dscf 2 42E

- 07 3 31E

- 08 1 46E

- 08 9 65E

- 08 Description Calculated Data

Run Number

Test Date

Emission Test Run Time Began - Ended Data Input By: Ben Rogers Job No.: 

## ENTEC Services, Inc.

30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124

CALCULATED TEST DATA

15

. Chromium (VI) concentration @ Std

. Conditions =0

. 00001543 ug C r VI /V m ( s td) c s C r VI gr/dscf 2

. 42E 07 3

. 31E 08 1

. 46E 08 9

. 65E 08

15. Total Chromium concentration @ Std. Conditions =0.00001543*ug C r /V m ( std ) c Cr gr/dscf 2.65E-06 1.20E-06 1.20E-07 1.32E-06
21. Chromium (VI) emissions = (60/7000)*c sCR ( VI ) *Q sd PMR CR(VI) lb/hr 7.95E-06 1.05E-06 4.60E-07 3.16E-06

21. Total Chromium emissions = (60/7000)*c sC r *Q sd PMR BH lb/hr 8.72E-05 3.80E-05 3.79E-06 4.30E-05

22. Volume collected through nozzle =T s /P s *[0.002669*V lc + V m *Y*P m /T m ] V n acf 178.453 179.369 183.500 180.441
23. Chromium (VI) concentration, @ actual conditions =0.00001543*m n /V n c a gr/acf 2.15E-07 1.02E-06 9.97E-08 4.44E-07
24. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent = 100*Vn / (60*v s *A n *  ) I % 102.99 102.49 103.04 102.84

Post Meter Orifice Cal. (EMC ALT-009 Yqa) y q a 0.9094 0.9232 0.9397 0.9241

1.38%

=DLL (detection level limited) % Difference, (Calibration must be within 5% of original Y-factor)Client: Test Date: 12/20/2011

Source: Run Number: 1

Traverse Point Delta P Sq. Rt. Delta P Delta H Stack Temp. (°F) Meter Temp. (°F)

1-1 0.67 0.8185 1.61 106 61

1-1 0.70 0.8367 1.69 105 62

1-1 0.70 0.8367 1.69 105 64

1-2 0.72 0.8485 1.74 107 67

1-2 0.70 0.8367 1.69 108 69

1-2 0.70 0.8367 1.69 111 71

1-3 0.60 0.7746 1.45 111 72

1-3 0.58 0.7616 1.40 110 74

1-3 0.56 0.7483 1.35 113 75

1-4 0.45 0.6708 1.08 112 76

1-4 0.45 0.6708 1.08 110 78

1-4 0.44 0.6633 1.06 110 78

2-1 0.67 0.8185 1.61 111 79

2-1 0.67 0.8185 1.61 113 80

2-1 0.67 0.8185 1.61 116 81

2-2 0.70 0.8367 1.69 115 82

2-2 0.71 0.8426 1.71 113 83

2-2 0.70 0.8367 1.69 117 83

2-3 0.60 0.7746 1.45 114 84

2-3 0.60 0.7746 1.45 112 84

2-3 0.60 0.7746 1.45 114 84

2-4 0.46 0.6782 1.11 112 85

2-4 0.50 0.7071 1.21 113 85

2-4 0.46 0.6782 1.11 113 86

K-Factor

2.41 0.61 0.7776 1.47 111.3 76.8 

# ENTEC Services, Inc.

Owens Corning Lakeland Plant

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 0061 Furnace 

### 30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124Client: Test Date: 12/21/2011

Source: Run Number: 2

Traverse Point Delta P Sq. Rt. Delta P Delta H Stack Temp. (°F) Meter Temp. (°F)

1-1 0.65 0.8062 1.54 124 63

1-1 0.67 0.8185 1.59 118 64

1-1 0.67 0.8185 1.59 118 65

1-2 0.64 0.8000 1.52 129 67

1-2 0.65 0.8062 1.54 124 69

1-2 0.63 0.7937 1.49 129 71

1-3 0.53 0.7280 1.26 131 73

1-3 0.53 0.7280 1.26 129 75

1-3 0.55 0.7416 1.30 122 76

1-4 0.45 0.6708 1.07 118 78

1-4 0.45 0.6708 1.07 118 79

1-4 0.45 0.6708 1.07 118 80

2-1 0.66 0.8124 1.56 117 81

2-1 0.68 0.8246 1.61 121 82

2-1 0.68 0.8246 1.61 123 83

2-2 0.67 0.8185 1.59 122 84

2-2 0.69 0.8307 1.64 122 84

2-2 0.68 0.8246 1.61 124 85

2-3 0.64 0.8000 1.52 120 86

2-3 0.63 0.7937 1.49 130 86

2-3 0.50 0.7071 1.19 174 86

2-4 0.52 0.7211 1.23 143 85

2-4 0.54 0.7348 1.28 133 86

2-4 0.56 0.7483 1.33 131 86

K-Factor

2.37 0.60 0.7706 1.41 126.6 78.1 

# ENTEC Services, Inc.

Owens Corning Lakeland Plant

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 0061 

### 30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124

FurnaceClient: Test Date: 12/21/2011

Source: Run Number: 3

Traverse Point Delta P Sq. Rt. Delta P Delta H Stack Temp. (°F) Meter Temp. (°F)

1-1 0.68 0.8246 1.64 125 66

1-1 0.70 0.8367 1.69 117 66

1-1 0.69 0.8307 1.66 115 68

1-2 0.69 0.8307 1.66 114 69

1-2 0.66 0.8124 1.59 125 71

1-2 0.66 0.8124 1.59 133 73

1-3 0.57 0.7550 1.37 131 75

1-3 0.55 0.7416 1.33 136 77

1-3 0.57 0.7550 1.37 137 78

1-4 0.51 0.7141 1.23 138 80

1-4 0.51 0.7141 1.23 124 82

1-4 0.51 0.7141 1.23 120 83

2-1 0.67 0.8185 1.61 124 84

2-1 0.65 0.8062 1.57 125 85

2-1 0.67 0.8185 1.61 127 86

2-2 0.65 0.8062 1.57 127 87

2-2 0.65 0.8062 1.57 135 88

2-2 0.65 0.8062 1.57 129 88

2-3 0.62 0.7874 1.49 128 88

2-3 0.63 0.7937 1.52 125 89

2-3 0.63 0.7937 1.52 123 89

2-4 0.53 0.7280 1.28 122 90

2-4 0.52 0.7211 1.25 120 90

2-4 0.52 0.7211 1.25 126 90

K-Factor

2.41 0.61 0.7812 1.48 126.1 80.9 

# ENTEC Services, Inc.

Owens Corning Lakeland Plant

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 006 

### 30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124

Furnace

# APPENDIX B

QA/QC DOCUMENTS AND CHECKLISTS

### Deg. Rankin 537.0



## 1.249

Date: 0.753 Equation: 10/(Volume)*SQRT((0.0319*(Tm/Pbar))
10/Volume= SQRT((0.0319*(Tm/Pbar))= 

# Y = 0.940

Meter Calibration % Difference -0.35% Meter Volume: 8.007 Average Temperature: 77.0 Final Volume: 205.007 Final Meter Temperature: 78.0 Initial Volume: 197.000 Initial Meter Temperature: 76.0 Calibration Date: 12/20/2010 Original Y Factor: 0.937 Meter Box: C#2887 Original Delta H @: 2.002

Source: Furnace 

### Job Number: 511250 Client: Owens Corning Lakeland Plant Location: Lakeland, FL 

# ENTEC Services, Inc.

Initial Meter Box 10 Minute Calibration 30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124

Signature: W. Stewart Meadows 12/19/2011 Barometric Pressure: 30.22Client: Job No. :

Source: Input By:

P Port Type Nipple Port Diameter

17

80

Inches Duct Diameters

154.0 9.06

240.0 14.12 4 4

Point No.

1 1.1 7.1

2 4.3 10.3

3 12.8 18.8

4 15.9 21.9

* Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch * Adjusted points diameter < 24" no point closer than 0.5 inch

Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 ; 4 points per port if the 8 / 2 diameters downstream and upstream criteria is met. Furnace

Distance "A"



### Distance "B" 2

6.00

Total Number of Traverse Points:

Number of Points per port / traverse: Number of Ports:

Length of Port, inches:

Inches Inside Stack Outside Nipple
Inches 8 

# Figure 4-1 Entec Services, Inc

30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124

Stack Area, Ft 2 : Stack Diameter, inches:

Stack Properties: Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate (P): 

### STACK DRAWING & TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION

511250 Stewart Meadows

4

1.576 Owens Corning Lakeland Plant

Stack Height, feet:

Upstream From Flow Disturbance (A):

Downstream From Flow Disturbance (B):

INCHES 

## 17.0 INCHES

INCHES



## 240.0 154.0Client:Source:Traverse PointDelta PSq. Rt. Delta PStack Temp. (°F)1-10.650.80621281-20.650.80621291-30.610.78101291-40.470.68561292-10.690.83071292-20.750.86601302-30.570.75501302-40.460.6782130Average0.610.7761129.3Note: Based on the preliminary traverse the flow is not considered cyclonic8.6315ENTEC Services, Inc.Test Date:Run No.:12/20/11Preliminary TestPreliminary Traverse & Cyclonic Flow VerificationFurnace30 Monroe Dr. Pelham, AL 35124Null Reading (Angle)15535610Owens Corning Lakeland Plant10

# APPENDIX C

LABORATORY DATA

# APPENDIX C.1

ENTHALPY REPORT #1211-69

METHOD 5 MULTIPLE METALS AND PM

# APPENDIX C.2

ELEMENT ONE REPORT #18035

METHOD 29 CHROMIUM

# Enthalpy 800 Capitola Dr., Ste. 1 Durham, NC 27713



# Project Number: 511250

Chromium

EPA Method 29 Analysis

Analytical Report 18035

Element One, Inc. 5022-C Wrightsville Av., Wilmington, NC 28403 910-793-0128 FAX: 910-792-6853 e1lab@e1lab.com 

# el 1

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 3 of 22 

# SUMMARY OF RESULTS

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 4 of 22 

# Summary of Analysis

Front Half - Summary of Method 29 Metals Analysis

Run 1 Run 2 Run 2 Run 3 Blank e18035-1FH e18035-2FH e18035-2FH dup e18035-3FH e18035-4FH 

## Element Total μg Total μg To tal μg Total μg Total μg

----------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- 

## Chromium 2.86 1.71 1.70 1.44 1.74

Back Half - Summary of Method 29 Metals Analysis

Run 1 Run 2 Run 2 Run 3 Blank e18035-1BH e18035-2BH e18035-2B H dup e18035-3BH e18035-4BH 

## Element Total μg Total μg To tal μg Total μg Total μg

----------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- 

## Chromium 1.63 0.881 0.859 0.507 0.861

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 5 of 22 

# ANALYTICAL NARRATIVE

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 6 of 22 

# Element One Analytical Narrative

Client: Enthalpy 

## Element One #: 18035 

## Client ID: 511250/OC – Lakeland 

## Analyst: DBW 

## Method: Method 29 

## Dates Received: 01/17/12 

## Analytes: Cr 

## Dates Analyzed: 01/19/12



## Summary of Analysis

The Method 29 samples were digested, prepared, and analyzed according to Method 29 protocol. Samples were analyzed for total chromium on a PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS.

Detection Limits

The ICP-MS instrument reporting lim it was 1.0μg/L for total chromium.

Analysis QA/QC

Duplicate analyses relative percent diffe rence (RPD), spike sample recovery, and second source calibration verification data are summarized in the Quality Control Section. All QA/QC data was within the criteria of the method.

Additional Comments

The reported results have not been correct ed for any blank values or spike recovery values. The ICP analysis of the Blank samples revealed detectable concentrations of chromium.

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 7 of 22 

# QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 8 of 22 

# Summary of Quality Control Data

Metals Duplicate Analysis RPD (Method 29 QC limits: < 20% for RPD) 

## Run 2 Front Half Run 2 Back Half Element RPD RPD

------------------ ----------------- ----------------- 

## Chromium 0.6% 2.5%

Metals Analysis Spike Recoveries

(Method 29 QC limits: ±25% for Spike Recoveries) 

## Run 3 Front Half Run 3 Back Half Element Recovery Recovery

------------------ ----------------- ----------------- 

## Chromium 124% 105% *See Analytical Narrative, page 12.



## Second Source Calibration Check Recoveries (Method 29 QC limits: ±10% for Second Source Continuing Check Standard*) 

## Element 1 ppb 50 ppb 100 ppb* 250 ppb

----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- 

## Chromium 116% 103% 101% 99%

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 9 of 22 

# SAMPLE CUSTODY

## element One 18035 Enthal 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 10 of 22

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 11 of 22

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 12 of 22 

# ANALYTICAL DATA

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 13 of 22 

# Analytical Calculations

MetalsElement Results (μg) =ICP Result s (μg/L)*Dilution*Final Volume (L)

WhereICP Results= Raw sample concentration (ppb)-- ICP-Data Sheet



## Dilution= Diluted Volume

-- ICP-MS Run Sheet 

## Aliquot

Final Volume=FH=Final Volume (FV)-- Sample Submission 

## BH=Received Volume (BV) .*Final Volume (FV)-- Sample Submission 

## Aliquot (Used) Combined Results=FH+BH

MercuryMercury Results (μg) =CVAA Results (μg) *Final Volume (ml) Aliquot (ml)

WhereCVAA Results= Raw sample reading (μg)-- Hg-Data Sheet


## Aliquot= Sample Aliquot (Alq.)-- Hg-Data Sheet


## Final Volume=Final Volume (FV)*-- Sample Submission 

## * With the exception of the BH fraction where- =Received Volume (BV)-- Sample Submission

# Analytical Calculations

Spike RecoverySpike (%) = (Spiked Result (μg/ L) – Sample Result (μg/L)) X100 Spike Amount (μg/L)

WhereSpike Result = Raw sample concentration (ppb)-- ICP-Data Sheet


## Sample Result = Raw sample concentration (ppb)-- ICP-Data Sheet


## Spike Amount-- ICP-MS Spike Table



## Duplicate Analysis RPDRPD (%) = (Duplicate Result (μg/ L) - Sample Result (μg/L)) X100 Average (μg/L)

WhereSample Result and Duplicate Result s=Raw sample concentration (ppb)-- ICP-Data Sheet


## Average= (Duplicate + Sample Results) 2

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 15 of 22

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 16 of 22

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 17 of 22

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 18 of 22

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 19 of 22

## element One 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 20 of 22

## element One 18035 Enthal 18035 Enthalpy M29 Report Packet Page 21 of 22s n

s n

s n

103 1170324 6

s n

s n Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: Blan k Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:32:0 2 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 140709.3 ppb |- Sc 45 506153.1 ppb | Cr 52 26563.1 ppb | Cr 53 38935.2 ppb |> Rh 103 1108623. 8 ppb Ho 165 1830420. 4 ppb Kr 83 222.3 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: Standard 1 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:33:1 3 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 148541. 8 ppb |- Sc 45 537253.7 ppb | Cr 52 48967.9 1.0759 ppb | Cr 53 44384.1 1.2297 ppb |> Rh 103 1182176.2 ppb Ho 165 193828 0 ppb Kr 83 -178.4 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: Standard 2 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:34:2 3 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 147510.2 ppb |- Sc 45 534745. 8 ppb | Cr 52 1945179.1 100.9631 ppb | Cr 53 274407 100.636 5 ppb | > Rh 103 1170324. 6 pp b Ho 165 1934981 ppb Kr 83 -33837.3 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: Standard 3 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:35:3 4 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 132134.2 ppb |- Sc 45 517907.1 ppb | Cr 52 9013217.2 499.8072 ppb | Cr 53 1136070. 9 499.8722 ppb |> Rh 103 1108129. 6 ppb Ho 165 1861296. 4 ppb Kr 83 -165009.6 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:36:4 4 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 132269.6 ppb |- Sc 45 502821. 9 ppb | Cr 52 30031.4 0.17486 ppb | Cr 53 41795.6 1.1064 ppb |> Rh 103 1120004. 5 ppb Ho 165 1807601.2 ppb Kr 83 210.1 mg/Ls n

s n

s n

103

s n

s n Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 2 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:37:5 5 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 146878.3 ppb |- Sc 45 548221.3 ppb | Cr 52 50545.2 1.16122 ppb | Cr 53 46307.4 2.0712 ppb |> Rh 103 1180618. 4 ppb Ho 165 193371 9 ppb Kr 83 -155.5 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 3 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:39:0 6 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 128581. 5 ppb |- Sc 45 499699.7 ppb | Cr 52 4348975. 3 246.6691 ppb | Cr 53 557112.2 242.704 9 ppb |> Rh 103 1079896.2 ppb Ho 165 1808368.1 ppb Kr 83 -76656.6 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:40:1 7 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 143836.2 ppb |- Sc 45 538950. 9 ppb | Cr 52 1969264 100.5613 ppb | Cr 53 281939. 5 101.959 9 ppb | > Rh 103 118922 3 pp b Ho 165 1945932.2 ppb Kr 83 -34795.1 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 5 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:41:2 9 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 137093. 9 ppb |- Sc 45 525156 ppb | Cr 52 970513. 5 51.56261 ppb | Cr 53 156445.3 52.31851 ppb |> Rh 103 1127492. 7 ppb Ho 165 1853456. 9 ppb Kr 83 212.1 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 7 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:42:4 0 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 156822.2 ppb |- Sc 45 622547.3 ppb | Cr 52 265569.2 11.88387 ppb | Cr 53 67623.1 10.1391 ppb |> Rh 103 1224854. 3 ppb Ho 165 2028980. 8 ppb Kr 83 98.2 mg/Ls n

s n

s n

103 1216509 2

s n

s n Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 2 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:43:51 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 144225.6 ppb |- Sc 45 543443.6 ppb | Cr 52 53978.2 1.26158 ppb | Cr 53 54771.5 5.03318 ppb |> Rh 103 1214735. 6 ppb Ho 165 1954746. 3 ppb Kr 83 -181.2 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: LRB FH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:45:0 3 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 153946.1 ppb |- Sc 45 596280.4 ppb | Cr 52 95224.3 3.2471 ppb | Cr 53 26107.6 -7.12532 ppb |> Rh 103 1242210.2 ppb Ho 165 2009366. 7 ppb Kr 83 146.2 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: LRB FH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:46:1 3 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 164127.2 ppb |- Sc 45 625801.4 ppb | Cr 52 114541 7 56.5413 ppb | Cr 53 147396. 5 43.4368 8 ppb | > Rh 103 1216509.2 pp b Ho 165 2044334.1 ppb Kr 83 141.9 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 18035-1 FH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:47:2 3 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 164903. 9 ppb |- Sc 45 753148. 9 ppb | Cr 52 531266.3 28.6431 ppb | Cr 53 73255.3 16.29204 ppb |> Rh 103 1086762. 7 ppb Ho 165 1969906. 8 ppb Kr 83 -4911.9 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 18035-2 FH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:48:3 4 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 160947.2 ppb |- Sc 45 826288.6 ppb | Cr 52 294321.7 17.12587 ppb | Cr 53 45028.3 5.58341 ppb |> Rh 103 97493 5 ppb Ho 165 1898400. 9 ppb Kr 83 -6749.5 mg/Ls n

s n

s n

103 1092614 2

s n

s n Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 18035-2 FH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:49:4 4 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 172578. 8 ppb |- Sc 45 869150.6 ppb | Cr 52 311135.7 17.02263 ppb | Cr 53 46356.2 4.85373 ppb |> Rh 103 1036341. 8 ppb Ho 165 1948980.2 ppb Kr 83 -7154.6 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 18035-3 FH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:50:5 4 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 170383.4 ppb |- Sc 45 940116.1 ppb | Cr 52 268198.3 14.4312 9 ppb | Cr 53 43154.2 3.24105 ppb |> Rh 103 1038852. 5 ppb Ho 165 1938710. 6 ppb Kr 83 -4352.1 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 18035-3 FH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:52:0 5 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 172903 ppb |- Sc 45 960055. 8 ppb | Cr 52 1377502. 5 76.216 ppb | Cr 53 173696.7 62.53274 ppb | > Rh 103 1092614.2 pp b Ho 165 1993662. 6 ppb Kr 83 -4473.2 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 18035-4 FH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:53:1 5 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 183870.2 ppb |- Sc 45 974372.3 ppb | Cr 52 354491. 5 17.39613 ppb | Cr 53 55442.2 6.45239 ppb |> Rh 103 1157432. 3 ppb Ho 165 2134297. 9 ppb Kr 83 -1390.3 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: LRB BH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:54:2 6 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 176769. 9 ppb |- Sc 45 640798.3 ppb | Cr 52 52124.4 1.15457 ppb | Cr 53 17493.3 -10.50206 ppb |> Rh 103 1220714.1 ppb Ho 165 2112425.1 ppb Kr 83 120.5 mg/Ls n

s n

s n

103 1250624 5

s n

s n Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: LRB BH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:55:3 6 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 177042.1 ppb |- Sc 45 658284 ppb | Cr 52 1203308. 6 57.06276 ppb | Cr 53 150575.2 42.28071 ppb |> Rh 103 1266697. 5 ppb Ho 165 2167348. 8 ppb Kr 83 158.1 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:56:4 9 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 134017.1 ppb |- Sc 45 511075. 9 ppb | Cr 52 22953.3 -0.2861 ppb | Cr 53 39733.6 -0.84531 ppb |> Rh 103 1188105.2 ppb Ho 165 1965279. 6 ppb Kr 83 273.9 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:58:0 0 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 141292.3 ppb |- Sc 45 545424.2 ppb | Cr 52 2066259. 6 100.3314 ppb | Cr 53 294910 101.313 9 ppb | > Rh 103 1250624. 5 pp b Ho 165 1987134. 6 ppb Kr 83 -37142 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 18035-1 BH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 09:59:1 3 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 126394. 8 ppb |- Sc 45 317581.6 ppb | Cr 52 349040.6 16.31131 ppb | Cr 53 56519.9 5.85769 ppb |> Rh 103 1209144.2 ppb Ho 165 1968891. 9 ppb Kr 83 -1161.3 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 18035-2 BH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:00:2 3 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 129125. 9 ppb |- Sc 45 506503. 5 ppb | Cr 52 205141.6 8.80964 ppb | Cr 53 36449.7 -2.76127 ppb |> Rh 103 1228923. 8 ppb Ho 165 1953583.2 ppb Kr 83 -1212.9 mg/Ls n

s n

s n

103 1197041 2

s n

s n Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 18035-2 BH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:01:3 4 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 129189.3 ppb |- Sc 45 491072.2 ppb | Cr 52 200371 8.59431 ppb | Cr 53 35427.6 -3.1434 ppb |> Rh 103 1225962. 4 ppb Ho 165 1952599. 3 ppb Kr 83 -1200.1 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 18035-3 BH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:02:4 4 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 124464. 8 ppb |- Sc 45 462006 ppb | Cr 52 130401. 5 5.07442 ppb | Cr 53 27007.8 -6.61776 ppb |> Rh 103 1226513.2 ppb Ho 165 1970931. 6 ppb Kr 83 -811.7 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 18035-3 BH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:03:5 5 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 122797.6 ppb |- Sc 45 454135.7 ppb | Cr 52 1148108. 3 57.6244 ppb | Cr 53 146638.7 44.11051 ppb | > Rh 103 1197041.2 pp b Ho 165 1951398. 9 ppb Kr 83 -813.2 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 18035-4 BH Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:05:0 5 Sample De Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 122557.6 ppb |- Sc 45 482921.1 ppb | Cr 52 160590.3 8.61261 ppb | Cr 53 29332.7 -2.6354 ppb |> Rh 103 980860. 9 ppb Ho 165 1696805. 4 ppb Kr 83 -131.7 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:06:1 7 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 128537 ppb |- Sc 45 496150.2 ppb | Cr 52 24056.1 -0.22352 ppb | Cr 53 46914.1 2.29111 ppb |> Rh 103 1183246. 5 ppb Ho 165 194587 3 ppb Kr 83 241.9 mg/Ls n Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da t Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:07:2 8 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten Conc. Mea Report Uni t Li 6 133121.4 ppb |- Sc 45 522147. 8 ppb | Cr 52 2011929.1 98.86711 ppb | Cr 53 285273.1 98.8326 ppb |> Rh 103 123535 3 ppb Ho 165 1962113. 3 ppb Kr 83 -36679 mg/L

# APPENDIX C.3

ELEMENT ONE REPORT #17933

METHOD 0061 TOTAL CHROMIUM AND HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM

# Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. 800 Capitola Dr., Ste. 1 Durham, NC 27713



# Project No: 511250

Total Chromium and Hexavalent Chromium

EPA Method 0061 Analysis

Analytical Report 17933

Element One, Inc. 5022-C Wrightsville Av., Wilmington, NC 28403 910-793-0128 FAX: 910-792-6853 e1lab@e1lab.com 

# el 1

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 3 of 30 

# SUMMARY OF RESULTS

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 4 of 30 

# Summary of Analysis

Fibertek Furnace - Summary of Chromium (VI) Analysis

Run 1 Run 2 Run 2 Run 3 e17933-5 e17933-6 e17933-6 du p e17933-7 

## Element Total μg Total μg Total μg Total μg

----------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- 

## Chromium(VI) 2.49 0.317 0.338 0.144 Duplicate RPD, % 0.5% 0.0% 8.4% 9.5% Spike Recovery, % ------------ ------------ ------------ 99%

0.5M KOH RB e17933-8 

## Element Total μg

----------------- --------------- 

## Chromium(VI) < 0.128 Duplicate RPD, % NA

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 5 of 30 

# Summary of Analysis

0.1M HNO 3 

## Rinse - Summary of Method 0061 Total Chromium Analysis

Run 1 Run 2 Run 2 Run 3 Reagent Blank e1 Sample ID e17933-1 e17933-2 e17933-2 dup e17933-3 e17933-4 

## Element Total μg Total μg Total μg Total μg Total μg

----------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- 

## Total Chromium 0.814 9.67 9.91 0.357 < 0.24

0.5M KOH - Summary of Method 0061 Total Chromium Analysis

Run 1 Run 2 Run 2 Run 3 Reagent Blank e1 Sample ID e17933-5 e17933-6 e17933-6 dup e17933-7 e17933-8 

## Element Total μg Total μg Total μg Total μg Total μg

----------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- 

## Total Chromium 24.0 1.69 1.75 < 0.685 < 0.255

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 6 of 30 

# ANALYTICAL NARRATIVE

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 7 of 30 

# Element One Analytical Narrative

Client: Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. 

## Element One #: 17933 

## Client ID: 511250/O.C. Lakeland 

## Analyst: DBW & LAL


## Method: M0061 

## Dates Received: 12/15/11 

## Analytes: Total Chromium & Chromium (VI) 

## Dates Analyzed: 12/16-20/11, 01/04-06/12



## Summary of Analysis

For Total Chromium analysis the Method 0061 samples were acidified with trace metals grade concentrated nitric acid and digested on a hotplate according to method protocol. Samples were analyz ed for total chromium on a PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS. For Chromium VI analysis the samples were prepared and analyzed according to SW-846 Method 0061 protocol. Samples we re analyzed for chro mium (VI) using a Shimadzu 2010 HPLC unit and a Ti mberline RDR-1 Reaction Module.

Detection Limits

The ICP-MS instrument reporting lim it was 1.0μg/L for total chromium. The Shimadzu 2010 HPLC instrument r eporting limit for chromium (VI) was 0.1μg/L.

Analysis QA/QC

For Total Chromium analysis duplicate analysis relative percent difference (RPD), spike sample recovery and second source calibration verification data are summarized in the Quality Control Summary. For Chromium VI analysis, duplicate analyse s relative percent difference (RPD) and spike sample recovery data are summarized with the results. All other QA/QC data was within t he criteria of the method.

Additional Comments

The reported results have not been correct ed for any blank values or spike recovery values. Due to matrix interferences it wa s necessary to analyze all samples at a minimum two-fold dilution. Per the client’s request the 0.5M KOH samples were analyzed for both chromium (VI) and total chromium.

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 8 of 30 

# QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 9 of 30 

# Summary of Quality Control Data

Metals Duplicate Analysis RPD (Method 0061 QC limits: < 10% for RPD) 

## 0.1M HNO 3 

## Run 2 0.5M KOH Run 2 Element RPD RPD

------------------ ----------------- ----------------- 

## Total Chromium 2.5% 3.3%

Metals Analysis Spike Recoveries (Method 0061 QC limits: ± 25% for Spike Recoveries.) 

## 0.1M HNO 3 

## Run 3 0.5M KOH Run 3 Element Recovery Recovery

------------------ ----------------- ----------------- 

## Total Chromium 102% 90%

Second Source Calibration Check Recoveries (Method 0061 QC limits: ±10% for Second Source Continuing Check Standard*) 

## Element 1 ppb 50 ppb 100 ppb* 250 ppb

----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- 

## Total Chromium 95% 98% 100% 99%

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 10 of 30 

# SAMPLE CUSTODY

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 11 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 12 of 30 

# ANALYTICAL DATA

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 13 of 30 

# Analytical Calculations

MetalsElement Results (μg) =ICP Results (μg/L)*Dilution*Begi nning Volume (L)

WhereICP Results= Raw sample concentration (ppb)-- ICP-Data Sheet



## Dilution= Diluted Volume

-- ICP-MS Run Sheet 

## Aliquot

Beginning Volume= (BV)-- Sample Submission



## Cr (VI)-

Total Cr +6 

## (ug) =Cr +6 

## Results (μg/L)*Dilution*Final Volume (mL)/1000

WhereCr +6 

## Results= Raw sample concentration (ppb)— HPLC Data Sheet



## Dilution= Diluted Volume

— HPLC Data Sheet 

## Aliquot

Final Volume-- Sample Submission

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 14 of 30 

# Analytical Calculations

Spike RecoverySpike (%) = (Spiked Result (μg/ L) – Sample Result (μg/L)) X100 Spike Amount (μg/L)

WhereSpike Result = Raw sample concentration (ppb)-- ICP-Data Sheet


## Sample Result = Raw sample concentration (ppb)-- ICP-Data Sheet


## Spike Amount-- ICP-MS Spike Table



## Duplicate Analysis RPDRPD (%) = (Duplicate Result (μg/ L) - Sample Result (μg/L)) X100 Average (μg/L)

WhereSample Result and Duplicate Result s=Raw sample concentration (ppb)-- ICP-Data Sheet


## Average= (Duplicate + Sample Results) 2

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 15 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 16 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 17 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 18 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 19 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 20 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 21 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 22 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 23 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 24 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 25 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 26 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 27 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 28 of 30

## element One 17933 Enthalpy M0061 TCr and Cr6 Report Packet.doc Page 29 of 30

### PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: Blan k Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 10:54:2 5 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 11692.5 ppb |- Sc 45 104340 ppb | Cr 52 6723.2 ppb | Cr 53 18304.4 ppb |> Rh 103 452268.8 ppb Ho 165 999886.2 ppb Kr 83 60.1 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: Standard 1 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 10:55:3 5 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 13333.5 ppb |- Sc 45 112713.9 ppb | Cr 52 12860.8 1.1573 ppb | Cr 53 18857.6 -0.98413 ppb |> Rh 103 479969.6 ppb Ho 165 1060348.1 ppb Kr 83 -70.5 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: Standard 2 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 10:56:4 6 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 11957.2 ppb |- Sc 45 105092.4 ppb | Cr 52 484964.4 101.20494 ppb | Cr 53 73357.8 98.84085 ppb |> Rh 103 458475 ppb Ho 165 1036019.8 ppb Kr 83 -12175.3 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: Standard 3 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 10:57:5 6 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 10443.5 ppb |- Sc 45 96361.8 ppb | Cr 52 2150458.8 499.7587 ppb | Cr 53 268690.8 500.2358 ppb |> Rh 103 416266.3 ppb Ho 165 976412.5 ppb Kr 83 -57161.4 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 10:59:0 7 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 12892.9 ppb |- Sc 45 112415.3 ppb | Cr 52 6161.4 -0.20214 ppb | Cr 53 15754.3 -6.44112 ppb |> Rh 103 482058.6 ppb Ho 165 1081338.7 ppb Kr 83 61.2 mg/L

ICP-Data 1 of 10 

## element One

e 17933-Metals 

## 30.1

### PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 2 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:00:1 8 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 10787.5 ppb |- Sc 45 96133 ppb | Cr 52 9487.9 0.71713 ppb | Cr 53 15454.8 -3.48913 ppb |> Rh 103 426293 ppb Ho 165 956521.3 ppb Kr 83 -58 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 3 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:01:2 8 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 12355.6 ppb |- Sc 45 112438.1 ppb | Cr 52 1223987.5 247.04918 ppb | Cr 53 164413.4 250.98926 ppb |> Rh 103 477905.1 ppb Ho 165 1093345.5 ppb Kr 83 -31915.4 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:02:4 0 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 11395.9 ppb |- Sc 45 101765.4 ppb | Cr 52 465396.6 99.89192 ppb | Cr 53 69777.5 96.00467 ppb |> Rh 103 445603.8 ppb Ho 165 996959.9 ppb Kr 83 -11912 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 5 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:03:51 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 11392.2 ppb |- Sc 45 102113.4 ppb | Cr 52 229873.4 48.92653 ppb | Cr 53 41552.8 44.11998 ppb |> Rh 103 442891.3 ppb Ho 165 997924.8 ppb Kr 83 78.4 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 6 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:05:01 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 17624.2 ppb |- Sc 45 161079.1 ppb | Cr 52 11301 0.29091 ppb | Cr 53 14102.6 -15.03856 ppb |> Rh 103 632748.7 ppb Ho 165 1513800.8 ppb Kr 83 84.8 mg/L

ICP-Data 2 of 10 

## element One

e 17933-Metals 

## 30.2

### PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 7 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:06:1 2 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 17179.2 ppb |- Sc 45 149891.4 ppb | Cr 52 72241.3 10.39686 ppb | Cr 53 20550.6 -4.76575 ppb |> Rh 103 592025.8 ppb Ho 165 1423130.9 ppb Kr 83 45.8 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 9 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:07:2 3 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 11633.9 ppb |- Sc 45 89008.6 ppb | Cr 52 8162.7 0.45904 ppb | Cr 53 9524.7 -14.56183 ppb |> Rh 103 416184.6 ppb Ho 165 946396 ppb Kr 83 52.8 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 10 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:08:3 3 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 14301.3 ppb |- Sc 45 111481.7 ppb | Cr 52 236642.4 45.99996 ppb | Cr 53 35394.8 27.01939 ppb |> Rh 103 484067.2 ppb Ho 165 1093256.2 ppb Kr 83 28.3 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 2 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:09:4 5 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 12466.8 ppb |- Sc 45 97717.1 ppb | Cr 52 10563.1 0.94614 ppb | Cr 53 14700.6 -5.13881 ppb |> Rh 103 429092.9 ppb Ho 165 965683.3 ppb Kr 83 -75.2 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 17933-1 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:10:5 6 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 12013.4 ppb |- Sc 45 72700.3 ppb | Cr 52 21311.3 3.25475 ppb | Cr 53 10459.7 -13.82125 ppb |> Rh 103 440207.8 ppb Ho 165 991059.9 ppb Kr 83 -53.3 mg/L

ICP-Data 3 of 10 

## element One

e 17933-Metals 

## 30.3

### PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 17933-2 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:12:0 7 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 13835.6 ppb |- Sc 45 110347 ppb | Cr 52 187035.5 38.6834 ppb | Cr 53 29458.4 20.39599 ppb |> Rh 103 452256.5 ppb Ho 165 1039709.3 ppb Kr 83 -222.2 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 17933-2 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:13:1 7 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 15276.8 ppb |- Sc 45 125029.6 ppb | Cr 52 213354 39.64801 ppb | Cr 53 31902.2 18.8994 ppb |> Rh 103 503755.3 ppb Ho 165 1157595.2 ppb Kr 83 -253.1 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 17933-3 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:14:2 7 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 15389.7 ppb |- Sc 45 124695.5 ppb | Cr 52 15623.4 1.42864 ppb | Cr 53 8303.8 -20.45798 ppb |> Rh 103 527945.2 ppb Ho 165 1177797.1 ppb Kr 83 -116.4 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 17933-3 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:15:3 8 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 12392.2 ppb |- Sc 45 103870.1 ppb | Cr 52 251279 52.25205 ppb | Cr 53 36732.4 33.42513 ppb |> Rh 103 454039.9 ppb Ho 165 1017689.8 ppb Kr 83 -88.3 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 17933-4 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:16:4 8 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 15389.8 ppb |- Sc 45 126704.9 ppb | Cr 52 10004.2 0.37461 ppb | Cr 53 7616.5 -21.6823 ppb |> Rh 103 534253.8 ppb Ho 165 1178942.3 ppb Kr 83 0.4 mg/L

ICP-Data 4 of 10 

## element One

e 17933-Metals 

## 30.4

### PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:18:01 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 12679.2 ppb |- Sc 45 103917.9 ppb | Cr 52 7282.2 0.10595 ppb | Cr 53 15737.3 -4.95189 ppb |> Rh 103 456394.9 ppb Ho 165 999280.1 ppb Kr 83 58.9 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da t Friday, December 30, 2011 11:19:11 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 12330.3 ppb |- Sc 45 104715.3 ppb | Cr 52 484127.7 101.53648 ppb | Cr 53 72406.6 97.78586 ppb |> Rh 103 456109.3 ppb Ho 165 1016086.9 ppb Kr 83 -12129.7 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: Blan k Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:23:3 5 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 7562 ppb |- Sc 45 50003.2 ppb | Cr 52 3844.8 ppb | Cr 53 9461.6 ppb |> Rh 103 221790 ppb Ho 165 581640.1 ppb Kr 83 38.7 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: Standard 1 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:24:4 5 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 7253.1 ppb |- Sc 45 45870.4 ppb | Cr 52 6112.4 1.19937 ppb | Cr 53 9212.3 1.00888 ppb |> Rh 103 210142.8 ppb Ho 165 552459.4 ppb Kr 83 -24.9 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: Standard 2 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:25:5 6 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 7446.1 ppb |- Sc 45 46958 ppb | Cr 52 230422.5 109.99531 ppb | Cr 53 35291.1 107.31661 ppb |> Rh 103 210414.7 ppb Ho 165 566131.5 ppb Kr 83 -5821.3 mg/L

ICP-Data 5 of 10 

## element One

e 17933-Metals 

## 30.5

### PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: Standard 3 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:27:0 6 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 7662 ppb |- Sc 45 48429.3 ppb | Cr 52 1094598.6 498.00054 ppb | Cr 53 139383.6 498.53666 ppb |> Rh 103 223529 ppb Ho 165 627354 ppb Kr 83 -29503.6 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:28:1 7 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 7584.2 ppb |- Sc 45 47865.7 ppb | Cr 52 3278.9 -0.23254 ppb | Cr 53 7536.8 -6.90836 ppb |> Rh 103 217742.9 ppb Ho 165 571824.7 ppb Kr 83 28.7 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 2 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:29:2 8 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 7469.7 ppb |- Sc 45 47623.8 ppb | Cr 52 5665.4 0.95687 ppb | Cr 53 7893.4 -4.66458 ppb |> Rh 103 212050.9 ppb Ho 165 558104.1 ppb Kr 83 -30.9 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 3 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:30:3 8 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 6940.7 ppb |- Sc 45 43800.9 ppb | Cr 52 508835.2 257.30324 ppb | Cr 53 68269.5 255.68198 ppb |> Rh 103 200452.2 ppb Ho 165 546763.2 ppb Kr 83 -13186.7 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:31:5 0 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 7590.2 ppb |- Sc 45 49217.2 ppb | Cr 52 242176.7 110.36421 ppb | Cr 53 36120.6 104.02877 ppb |> Rh 103 220406.7 ppb Ho 165 590310.2 ppb Kr 83 -6094.2 mg/L

ICP-Data 6 of 10 

## element One

e 17933-Metals 

## 30.6

### PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 5 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:33:01 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 8179.3 ppb |- Sc 45 53318.9 ppb | Cr 52 124081.1 53.37283 ppb | Cr 53 21749.7 44.6569 ppb |> Rh 103 229661.7 ppb Ho 165 618003.2 ppb Kr 83 21.3 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 7 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:34:1 2 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 10.3 ppb |- Sc 45 254.3 ppb | Cr 52 1906.9 14003.895 ppb | Cr 53 3859.2 258739.85 ppb |> Rh 103 20 ppb Ho 165 47.7 ppb Kr 83 210.2 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 17933-5 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:36:3 6 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 7075 ppb |- Sc 45 57727.9 ppb | Cr 52 113318.7 42.09263 ppb | Cr 53 17254.4 19.55689 ppb |> Rh 103 263661.1 ppb Ho 165 679605.8 ppb Kr 83 -97.9 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 17933-7 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:40:0 7 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 8477 ppb |- Sc 45 62115.8 ppb | Cr 52 6732.2 0.73757 ppb | Cr 53 2947.1 -27.38322 ppb |> Rh 103 274091.2 ppb Ho 165 720592.7 ppb Kr 83 -237.2 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 17933-7 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:41:1 7 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 8931.2 ppb |- Sc 45 65379.6 ppb | Cr 52 136426.9 45.1477 ppb | Cr 53 19044.6 18.46084 ppb |> Rh 103 296760.3 ppb Ho 165 779079 ppb Kr 83 -270.8 mg/L

ICP-Data 7 of 10 

## element One

e 17933-Metals 

## 30.7

### PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 17933-8 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:42:2 8 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 6125.3 ppb |- Sc 45 49946.9 ppb | Cr 52 4508.8 0.54219 ppb | Cr 53 2194.9 -27.16255 ppb |> Rh 103 199080.9 ppb Ho 165 571235.9 ppb Kr 83 -48.1 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:47:1 2 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 13284.2 ppb |- Sc 45 66871.8 ppb | Cr 52 3547.7 -0.65796 ppb | Cr 53 3570.4 -27.20741 ppb |> Rh 103 325846.8 ppb Ho 165 802467.1 ppb Kr 83 49.1 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 14:48:2 3 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 12912.3 ppb |- Sc 45 64058.3 ppb | Cr 52 303833.3 97.40979 ppb | Cr 53 40107.3 73.47831 ppb |> Rh 103 312665.7 ppb Ho 165 784411 ppb Kr 83 -8504.2 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 15:13:1 3 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 13066.2 ppb |- Sc 45 54019 ppb | Cr 52 2983.8 -0.61845 ppb | Cr 53 3166.6 -26.34665 ppb |> Rh 103 264652.3 ppb Ho 165 644876.8 ppb Kr 83 38.4 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da t Wednesday, January 04, 2012 15:14:2 3 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 11566.1 ppb |- Sc 45 48297.6 ppb | Cr 52 229647.5 96.209 ppb | Cr 53 30275.7 72.01401 ppb |> Rh 103 239206 ppb Ho 165 599111.9 ppb Kr 83 -6558.7 mg/L

ICP-Data 8 of 10 

## element One

e 17933-Metals 

## 30.8

### PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 17933-6 Sample Da t Thursday, January 05, 2012 09:29:3 5 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 4741 ppb |- Sc 45 33986.1 ppb | Cr 52 7218.9 2.52983 ppb | Cr 53 3053.2 -21.31877 ppb |> Rh 103 171391.7 ppb Ho 165 438893 ppb Kr 83 -231.8 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da t Thursday, January 05, 2012 10:31:0 3 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 11092.4 ppb |- Sc 45 68658.6 ppb | Cr 52 5109.4 -0.18639 ppb | Cr 53 7501.8 -17.0675 ppb |> Rh 103 329455.2 ppb Ho 165 767095.6 ppb Kr 83 23.8 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da t Thursday, January 05, 2012 10:32:1 4 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 10792.8 ppb |- Sc 45 68115.2 ppb | Cr 52 308275.6 93.38726 ppb | Cr 53 41968.3 72.32628 ppb |> Rh 103 330651.9 ppb Ho 165 767071.6 ppb Kr 83 -8656.1 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da t Thursday, January 05, 2012 10:44:0 3 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 14874.5 ppb |- Sc 45 72640.8 ppb | Cr 52 4390.1 -0.41898 ppb | Cr 53 4152.6 -25.87464 ppb |> Rh 103 331975.7 ppb Ho 165 784485.7 ppb Kr 83 12.7 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da t Thursday, January 05, 2012 10:45:1 3 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 13321.7 ppb |- Sc 45 64274.4 ppb | Cr 52 293612.6 96.68435 ppb | Cr 53 39068.1 73.5435 ppb |> Rh 103 304377.9 ppb Ho 165 736773.7 ppb Kr 83 -8274.5 mg/L

ICP-Data 9 of 10 

## element One

e 17933-Metals 

## 30.9

### PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: LRB Sample Da t Thursday, January 05, 2012 14:18:4 9 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 11495.8 ppb |- Sc 45 71169.8 ppb | Cr 52 5989.3 0.10369 ppb | Cr 53 7591.2 -16.6446 ppb |> Rh 103 326369.5 ppb Ho 165 927662.1 ppb Kr 83 36.9 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: LRB Sample Da t Thursday, January 05, 2012 14:20:0 0 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 11965.9 ppb |- Sc 45 73724.7 ppb | Cr 52 206979.8 60.59096 ppb | Cr 53 31004.1 41.9387 ppb |> Rh 103 338745.8 ppb Ho 165 957016.7 ppb Kr 83 39.8 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: 17933-6 Sample Da t Thursday, January 05, 2012 14:21:1 0 Sample De s Enthalp y Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 6265.5 ppb |- Sc 45 43669.6 ppb | Cr 52 7973.5 2.44684 ppb | Cr 53 4111.6 -18.32476 ppb |> Rh 103 193025.8 ppb Ho 165 556747.2 ppb Kr 83 -268.4 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da t Thursday, January 05, 2012 14:30:3 6 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 13398.9 ppb |- Sc 45 71679.5 ppb | Cr 52 3386.3 -0.76334 ppb | Cr 53 4210.3 -26.09429 ppb |> Rh 103 343589.4 ppb Ho 165 876993.2 ppb Kr 83 41.9 mg/L Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Repor t Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da t Thursday, January 05, 2012 14:31:4 6 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inten s Conc. Mea n Report Uni t Li 6 14648.7 ppb |- Sc 45 79211.6 ppb | Cr 52 372160.2 100.84963 ppb | Cr 53 49634.5 78.47497 ppb |> Rh 103 370128.5 ppb Ho 165 954451.2 ppb Kr 83 -10131.8 mg/L

ICP-Data 10 of 10 

## element One

e 17933-Metals 

## 30.10

# APPENDIX D

CALIBRATION DATA

# TYPE S PITOT TUBE INSPECTION DATA SHEET

Certification I certify that the Type S pitot tube/probe ID # NC-PA-25-A meets or exceeds all specifications, criteria and/or applicable desi gn features and is hereby assigned a pitot tube calibration factor C p 

## of 0.84. NIST traceable digital thermometer serial num ber 111483849 was used as reference temperature.

Certified and Calibrated By: Ed Brown

Date Certified: 10 Jan.2012 Annual Calibration Parameter Value Allowable Range Assembly Level? YES Yes Holes Damaged? NO No

Obstructed? NO No

 1 0 -10  <  1 < +10 

 2 0 -10  <  2 < +10   1 0 -5  <  1 < +5   2 0 -5  <  2 < +5 

 0

 0

A 0.933 for 1/4” OD, 0.526 to 0.750 for 3/8” OD, 0.788 to 1.125



## Z = A sin  0 Z =  0.125”

W = A sin  0 W =  0.031”

P A 

## 0.467 for 1/4” OD, 0.263 to 0.375 for 3/8” OD, 0.394 to 0.563



## P B 

## 0.467 for 1/4” OD, 0.263 to 0.375 for 3/8” OD, 0.394 to 0.563


## P A 

## - P B 

## 0 -0.063 to 0.063”

D T 

## 0.373 0.188 to 0.375”
Thermocouple Cal. 64.2 Reference temp.
Thermocouple Cal. 63.7 Probe ThermocoupleCalibration Date: 8/4/2011 Calibrated by: Lalan Kirby

\

Entec Services Temperature **Reference Thermocouple Difference Within

ID Number Source Temperature Temperature Degrees F Tolerance

TC-1 ambient 68 68 0 Yes

TC-2 ambient 68 67 1 Yes

TC-6 ambient 68 68 0 Yes

TC-8 ambient 70 68 2 Yes

TC-9 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

TC-11 ambient 69 70 1 Yes

TC-14 ambient 68 67 1 Yes

TC-15 ambient 69 68 1 Yes

TC-16 ambient 69 68 1 Yes

TC-17 ambient 70 68 2 Yes

TC-20 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

TC-22 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

TC-23 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

TCS - 3 ambient 67 68 1 Yes

TCS - 4 ambient 67 68 1 Yes

TCS - 5 ambient 67 69 2 Yes

TSC -8 ambient 68 68 0 Yes

Fluke Hand Held 1 ambient 68 69 1 Yes

Fluke Hand Held 2 ambient 68 68 0 Yes

TCG - 001 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

TCG - 002 ambient 69 68 1 Yes

TCG - 003 ambient 70 70 0 Yes

TCG - 004 ambient 70 70 0 Yes

TCG - 005 ambient 69 70 1 Yes

TCG - 006 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

TCG - 007 ambient 69 68 1 Yes

TCG - 008 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

TCG - 009 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

TCG - 011 ambient 68 69 1 Yes

TCG - 012 ambient 68 68 0 Yes

TCG - 013 ambient 68 68 0 Yes

TCG - 014 ambient 68 68 0 Yes

TCG - 015 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

TCG - 016 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

TCG - 017 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

2947 ambient 68 68 0 Yes

2948 ambient 68 68 0 Yes

2958 ambient 68 67 1 Yes

3917 ambient 69 70 1 Yes

3918 ambient 69 70 1 Yes

3920 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

3923 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

3926 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

3927 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

3932 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

3933 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

3936 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

3938 ambient 69 69 0 Yes

Temperature tolerance within +/- 2 0 F of acceptable ranges for all thermocouples. ** Note: NIST Traceable Digital Thermometer Serial Number 101826260 was used as reference temperature 

# ENTEC Services, Inc.

30 Monroe Drive - Pelham, Al 35124

Annual Thermocouple Calibrations

### Calibration Date: 8/4/2011 Calibrated by: Lalan Kirby

\



### Entec Services Temperature **Reference Thermocouple Difference Within

ID Number Source Temperature Temperature Degrees F Tolerance

GN-1 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-2 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-3 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-4 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-5 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-6 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-7 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-8 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-9 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-11 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-13 ambient 66 66 0 Yes

GN-14 ambient 67 65 2 Yes
GN-15 (Mini HB ambient 67 65 2 Yes
GN-16 (Mini HB) ambient 67 68 -1 Yes

GN-17 ambient 67 67 0 Yes
GN-18 (Mini HB) ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-21 ambient 67 65 2 Yes
GN-22 (Mini HB) ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-23 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-24 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-26 ambient 67 66 1 Yes

GN-27 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-28 ambient 67 67 0 Yes

GN-29 ambient 67 66 1 Yes

GN-30 ambient 66 66 0 Yes

** Note: NIST Traceable Digital Thermometer Serial Number 101826260 was used as reference temperature 

# ENTEC Services, Inc.

30 Monroe Drive - Pelham, Al 35124



### Annual Gooseneck Thermocouple Calibrations

Temperature tolerance within +/- 2 0 

### F of acceptable ranges for all thermocouples.

# APPENDIX E

QSTI CERTIFICATIONS

# APPENDIX F

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS AND NOMENCLATURE

## NOMENCLATURE

A s 

## Cross-sectional area of stack, square feet A n 

## Cross-sectional area of nozzle, square feet ACFM Actual cubic feet of gas per minute at stack conditions B ws 

## Proportion by volume of water vapor in gas stream C s 

## Particulate concentration in stack gas, gr/dscf C a 

## Particulate concentration in stack gas, gr/acf C p 

## Pitot tube coefficient ∆ H Pressure drop across orifice meter, inches water ∆ P Velocity head of stack gas, inches water dscf Cubic feet of dry gas corrected to standard conditions EA Excess Air E/Btu Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/mmBtu F F-factor, 9640 dscf/MMBTU's of heat input K p 

## Constant (85.49) M n 

## Total particulate matter collected, mg M d 

## Molecular weight of stack gas; dry basis, lb/lb-mole M s 

## Molecular weight of stack gas; wet basis, lb/lb-mole I Percent of isokinetic sampling P bar 

## Barometric pressure, inches mercury P g 

## Stack static pressure, inches of water P m 

## Barometric pressure of dry gas meter, in. mercury PMR Particulate mass rate, pounds/hour P s 

## Absolute stack gas pressure, inches mercury P std 

## Barometric pressure, standard conditions, 29.92 inches Hg Q a 

## Volumetric flow rate, actual conditions, ACF/min Q s 

## Volumetric flow rate, standard conditions, scf/min Q std 

## Volumetric flow rate, dry standard conditions, dscf/min TB ws 

## Theoretical water vapor in the gas stream based on saturated stack conditions, proportion by volume (dimensionless) TV lc 

## Theoretical volume of water collected based on saturated stack conditions, ml TV wstd 

## Theoretical volume of water vapor in the gas sample based on saturated stack conditions, corrected to standard temperature and pressure, scf T m 

## Absolute average dry gas meter temperature, degree R (460) T s 

## Absolute average stack gas temperature, degree R (460) T std 

## Absolute temperature at standard conditions, 528 R Ө Total sampling time, minutes V lc 

## Total volume collected in impingers and silica gel, gr V m 

## Volume of gas sampled through gas meter, cubic feet V n 

## Volume collected at stack conditions through nozzle, ACF V ma 

## Stack gas volume sampled, ACF V mstd 

## Volume of gas sampled through gas meter, cubic feet V s 

## Average stack gas velocity, feet/sec V wcstd 

## Volume of water vapor in gas sampled from impingers, standard cubic feet V wsgstd 

## Volume of water vapor in gas sampled from silica gel, standard cubic feet W imp 

## Total volume collected in impingers, gr W sg 

## Total volume collected in silica gel, gr Y Dry gas meter calibration factor

### TEST CALCULATIONS Owens Corning Lakeland Plant Lakeland, FL Melt Furnace (EU 002) Run No. 1

Equations Equation Components Results

1 Ps = Pbar + (Pg/13.6) Pbar Pg Ps (in. Hg) (in. H2O) (in. Hg) 30.22 -0.37 30.19

2 Pm = Pbar + ( ∆ H/13.6) Pbar ∆ H P m (in. Hg) (in. H2O) (in. Hg) 30.22 1.49 30.329

3 Vmstd = 17.647 * Vm * Y * (Pm/Tm) Vm Y Pm Tm Vmstd (ft3) (in. Hg) (oR) (std. ft3) 173.663 0.937 30.33 550.00 158.287

4a Vwc(std) = 0.04706 * Wimp Wimp Vwc(std) (grams) (std. ft3)

55 2.588

4b Vwsg(std) = 0.04715 * Wsg Wsg Vwsg(std) (grams) (std. ft3)

32.4 1.528

5 Bws = Vwstd/(Vmstd + Vwstd) Vwstd Vmstd Bws (std. ft3) (std. ft3) (fraction)

4.12 158.29 0.0253

9 Md = (0.44*%CO2) + (0.32*%O2) + (0.28*((100-(%CO2 + %O2))) CO2 O2 Md (%) (%) (g/g-mole) 0.70 20.20 28.920

10 Ms = Md * (1-Bws) + 18* Bws Md Bws TBws Ms g/g-mole (fraction) % (g/g-mole)

28.92 0.0253 7.0385 28.643

11 Vs = 85.49 * Cp * ( ∆ pavg)^1/2 * (Ts/Ps*Ms)^1/2 Cp ( ∆ pavg)1/2 Ts Ps Ms Vs (in. H2O) (oR) (in. Hg) (g/g-mole) (ft/sec) 0.84 0.777 582.4 30.19 28.64 45.78

12 Qa = Vs * As * 60 Vs As Qa (ft/sec) (ft2) (acf/min) 45.78 1.576 4,330

13 Qs = Qa * (528/Ts) * (Ps/29.92) Qa Ts Ps Qs (acf/min) (oR) (in. Hg) (scf/min) 4,330 582.4 30.19 3,961

14 Qstd = Qa * (1-Bws)*(528/Ts)*(Ps/29.92) Qa Bws Ts Ps Qstd (acf/min) (fraction) (oR) (in. Hg) (dscf/min) 4,330 0.0253 582.4 30.19 3,861

15 Cs = 0.00001543 * (Mn/Vmstd) Mn Vmstd Cs (mg) (ft3) (gr/scfd) 12.900 158.287 1.26E-03

18 PMR = Cs * Qstd * (60/7000) Cs Qstd PMR (gr/scfd) (dscf/min) (lbs/hr) 1.26E-03 3,861 0.042

19 Vn = Ts/Ps * {(0.002669) * Vlc + (Vm * Y * Pm)/Tm)} Ts Ps Vlc Vm Y Vn (oR) (in. Hg) (gr) (ft3) (acf) 582.4 30.193 87.40 173.663 0.937 177.587

Pm Tm (in. Hg) (oR) 30.329 550.00

### TEST CALCULATIONS Owens Corning Lakeland Plant Lakeland, FL Melt Furnace (EU 002) Run No. 1

Equations Equation Components Results

21 I = Vn * 100/(60 * Θ * Vs * An) Vn Vs An Θ I (acf) (ft/sec) (ft2) (min) (%) 177.587 45.782 0.000264 240 102.04


### Equations for Metals Emissions Calculations

22 C Cr = 0.001 mg/ug * ug / dscm Meter Vol. C Cr Filterable Chromiuim concentration at standard conditions dscm mg/dscm 4.482 6.38E-04 Chromiuim Mass
ug 2.86

23 C Cr-7% =C Cr * ((20.9-7)/(20.9-%O2)) C Cr O 2 C Cr-7% Filterable Chromium concentration at 7% oxygen mg/dscm (%) mg/dscm @ 7% O2 6.38E-04 20.20 1.27E-02

24 Cr kg/hr = 0.000001 kg/mg * C Cr mg/dscm *Qsd m3/min * 60 min/hr C Cr Qstd Cr kg/hr Hourly Filterable Chromium emissions mg/dscm (dscm/min) kg/h r 6.38E-04 112 4.29E-06 Cr lbs/hr

9.47E-06

# APPENDIX G

ICR DOCUMENTS

# APPENDIX G.1

EPA LETTER AND ENCLOSURES 1 AND 2

# APPENDIX H

CONFIDENTIAL PR ODUCTION DATA

# Process information will be submitted electronically separately as Confidential Business Information (CBI).

# This is the last page of
this report.