alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60420-60421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26044]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-260-003]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

October 4, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 27, 2000, Texas Gas Transmission

[[Page 60421]]

Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 13, 
with an effective date of June 1, 2000.
    Texas Gas states that the filing is being made because Texas Gas's 
April 28, 2000, filing inadvertently omitted Thirteenth Revised Sheet 
No. 13 reflecting the revised rates for Rate Schedules FFS and ISS as 
presented on Schedule J-2, Parts 28 and 29, respectively, of the above 
referenced filing. Texas Gas respectfully requests that the tariff 
sheet be accepted for filing and be subject to the provisions of the 
Commission's May 31, 2000 ``Order Accepting and Suspending Tariff 
Sheets Subject to Refund and Conditions, Rejecting Other Tariff Sheets, 
and Establishing a Hearing and Settlement Procedures,'' 91 FERC para. 
61,215 (2000) which includes being suspended and permitted to become 
effective November 1, 2000, subject to refund, and subject to the 
conditions set forth in the body of the order.
    Texas Gas states that copies of the filing have been served upon 
Texas Gas's jurisdictional customers, interested state commissions, and 
all parties appearing on the official restricted service list in this 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call (202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26044 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

 v. 

ZTE CORPORATION; ZTE (USA), INC.; 

AND ZTE (TX), INC., 

Defendant. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00490-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND RESPONSE 

BRIEF DEADLINES TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development (“WSOU”) 

files this unopposed motion to extend the deadline to file a response to Motions to Dismiss4 filed 

by defendants ZTE Corporation; ZTE (USA), Inc.; and ZTE (TX), Inc. (“Defendants”), and would 

show as follows: 

1. On October 9, 2020, Defendants filed Motions to Dismiss, respectively, at Dkt. 

Nos. 21, 22, 23 (corrected by Dkt. 24). 

2. Pursuant to the Local Rules, WSOU’s deadline to file responses to the Motions is 

October 24, 2020. WSOU requests a three-week extension of its deadlines to November 6, 2020. 

3. This is the first extension WSOU has requested. The requested extension should 

cause no delay in the schedule.

4. WSOU has consulted with counsel for Defendants, and Defendants have indicated 

that they do not oppose this extension request. 

4 The motions were additionally styled with an alternative relief to transfer. For simplification, the 

motions will be styled herein as Motions to Dismiss. 

Case 6:20-cv-00490-ADA Document 25 Filed 10/13/20 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, WSOU respectfully requests that the deadline to file a respond to 

Defendant’s Motions, Dkt. Nos. 21, 22, 23 (corrected by Dkt. 24) be extended to November 6, 

2020. 

Dated: October 13, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Ryan S. Loveless

 James L. Etheridge

 Texas Bar No. 24059147 

Ryan S. Loveless 

Texas Bar No. 24036997 

Brett A. Mangrum 

Texas Bar No. 24065671 

Travis L. Richins 

Texas Bar No. 24061296 

Jeff Huang

Etheridge Law Group, PLLC 

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324 

Southlake, TX 76092 

Tel.: (817) 470-7249 

Fax: (817) 887-5950 

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Jeff@EtheridgeLaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR WSOU

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record, who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this October 13, 2020, with a copy of this document via email.

/s/ Ryan S. Loveless

Ryan S. Loveless 

Case 6:20-cv-00490-ADA Document 25 Filed 10/13/20 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|Michigan Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|Michigan Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 20     | 10     | 6      | 1     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 15     | 17     | 15     | 30     | 29     | 25     | 24     | 12     | 28     | 21    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 1      | 0      | 15     | 15     | 16     | 10     | 14     | 0      | 6     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Enesco.
  November 14, 2006/s/ Basil A. ElliottBasil ElliottPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Marie Meisenbach GraulMarie Meisenbach GraulExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL 

INC., AND EMC CORPORATION

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-00410

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(i) NOTICE OF 

DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff in the above-captioned action 

give notice that Defendants are voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. Defendants have not filed 

an answer or a motion for summary judgment in this matter. 

Dated: June 2, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Ryan S. Loveless

James L. Etheridge

Texas State Bar No. 24059147 

Ryan S. Loveless

Texas State Bar No. 24036997 

Travis L. Richins

Texas State Bar No. 24061296

ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Telephone: (817) 470-7249

Facsimile: (817) 887-5950

Case 6:20-cv-00410-ADA Document 7 Filed 06/02/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document was served upon all counsel of record via the 

Court's CM/ECF electronic filing system on June 2, 2020. 

/s/ Ryan S. Loveless

Ryan S. Loveless

Case 6:20-cv-00410-ADA Document 7 Filed 06/02/20 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2010-1276 SNPRM

Directorate ID: 2010-NM-092-AD

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 
Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
Exhibit  32


                              Certification
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
   and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of The  L.S. Starrett Company,  a Massachusetts
corporation  (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 27, 2003
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  February 6, 2004                 	/s/ Douglas A. Starrett
	                                      Douglas A. Starrett
				               Chief Executive Officer


Date:  February 6, 2004                 	/s/ Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
	                                     	Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
				               Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The L.S. Starrett Company and will be retained by The L.S.
Starrett Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

AND EMC CORPORATION,

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00473-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DECLARATION OF BRIAN A. ROSENTHAL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ 

NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF

OPPOSED MOTION FOR INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER OF VENUE 

TO THE AUSTIN DIVISION OF THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 71-1 Filed 02/05/21 Page 1 of 2
1

I, Brian A. Rosenthal, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney permitted to practice law before this Court pro hac vice and am 

licensed to practice law in New York and the District of Columbia. I am a partner with the law 

firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and counsel of record for Defendants Dell Technologies 

Inc., Dell Inc., and EMC Corporation in the above-captioned action. I have personal knowledge 

and/or am directly informed of the matters stated below and, if called, would testify to them under 

oath.

2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 28 is a true and correct copy of WSOU Investments, 

LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development’s Opposition Brief to Xilinx, Inc.’s Motion to

Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404, which was filed as Docket Number 23 in Case No. 

1:20-cv-01228-CFC (D. Del.), on January 20, 2021.

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 29 is a true and correct copy of the Declaration of Stuart 

A. Shanus in Support of Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and 

Development’s Opposition to Xilinx, Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1404, which was filed as Docket Number 24 in Case No. 1:20-cv-01228-CFC (D. Del.), on January 

20, 2021.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: February 5, 2021

/s/ Brian A. Rosenthal___ Brian A. Rosenthal

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 71-1 Filed 02/05/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 11 STERLING BANCORP AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,2008

2007

2008

2007Income from continuing
 operations, net of tax

$
3,785,503

$
3,841,057

$
11,957,461

$
11,204,168Loss from discontinued
 operations, net of tax





(774,315
)




(795,034
)Net income available for
 common shareholders

$
3,785,503

$
3,066,742

$
11,957,461

$
10,409,134Weighted average common
 shares outstanding


18,015,871


17,910,268


17,972,517


18,329,750Add dilutive effect
of:Stock options


210,940


311,287


246,858


420,116Adjusted for assumed
 diluted computation


18,226,811


18,221,555


18,219,375


18,749,866Income from continuing
 operations, net of tax, per average common share:Basic

$
0.21

$
0.21

$
0.67

$
0.61Diluted

$
0.21

$
0.21

$
0.66

$
0.60Loss from discontinued
 operations, net of tax, per average common share:Basic

$


($
0.04
)
$


($
0.04
)Diluted

$


($
0.04
) (1)
$


($
0.04
)Net income per average
 common share:Basic

$
0.21

$
0.17

$
0.67

$
0.57Diluted

$
0.21

$
0.17

$
0.66

$
0.56  (1)
Due to a loss
for the period, zero incremental shares are included because the effect would
be antidilutive. 47
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT / L WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS D 

DEL RIO DIVISION JUN1 

.1 2O 

§ 

IN THE MATTER OF § 

ALFONSO OTERO. 

bR 2Oii4 

On June 9, 2020 at 9:00 a.m., the case of United States v. Rodriguez-Herrera, DR-19-CR2908-AM, was set for docket call before this Court. Alfonso Otero, counsel for the Defendant, 

was scheduled to appear on behalf of his client. Mr. Otero was not present at this proceeding and 

neglected to explain his absence to the Court beforehand. 

Mr. Otero is hereby ORDERED to show cause why a sanction of criminal contempt should 

not be imposed pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 42 for his failure to appear in Court 

as required. Mr. Otero is ORDERED to appear at a hearing before the Court, sitting in Del Rio, 

Texas, on July 14, 2020, at 10:15 a.m. to show cause why he should not be held in contempt and 

fined and/or imprisoned as mentioned herein. The Court requests that the prosecutor for the 

Government in the aforementioned case prosecute this contempt proceeding. 

In lieu of personally appearing in Court, Mr. Otero may deposit $750.00 with the registry 

of the Court before the date and time of his contempt hearing. Failure to comply will result in the 

imposition of sanctions. 

SIGNED and ENTERED on this 11th day of June, 2020. 

ALIA MOSES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:20-mc-00041-AM Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5306 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5306

  To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on Cyazofamid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Ms. Schwartz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on Cyazofamid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYAZOFAMID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by by striking heading 
9902.24.56 (relating to Cyazofamid) and inserting in numerical sequence 
the following new heading:

``     9902.24.56        4-chloro-2-cyano-   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          N,N-dimethyl-5-(4-                                                12/31/2015
                          methylphenyl)-1H-
                          imidazole-1-
                          sulfonamide
                          (Cyazofamid
                          Technical) (CAS
                          No. 120116-88-3)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2935.00.75) and
                          any formulations
                          containing such
                          compound
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3808.92.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32011-32012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13697]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7467]

Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of the United 
States of America and the Government of the Republic of Bolivia

    Notice of Proposal to Extend the Memorandum of Understanding 
Between the Government of the United States of America and the 
Government of the Republic of Bolivia Concerning the Imposition of 
Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material from the Pre-Columbian 
Cultures and Certain Ethnological Material from the Colonial and 
Republican Periods of Bolivia.
    The Government of the Republic of Bolivia has informed the 
Government of the United States of its interest in an extension of the 
Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of the United States 
of America and the Government of the Republic of Bolivia Concerning the 
Imposition of Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material from the 
Pre-Columbian Cultures and Certain Ethnological Material from the 
Colonial and Republican Periods of Bolivia (MOU), first entered into in 
2001 and extended in 2006.

[[Page 32012]]

    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Assistant Secretary for 
Educational and Cultural Affairs, and pursuant to the requirement under 
19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1), an extension of this MOU is hereby proposed.
    Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(2), the views and recommendations of 
the Cultural Property Advisory Committee regarding this proposal will 
be requested.
    A copy of the MOU, the Designated List of restricted categories of 
material, and related information can be found at the following Web 
site: http://exchanges.state.gov/heritage/culprop.

    Dated: May 25, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2011-13697 Filed 6-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 32(2)


         CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of 7-Eleven,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward W.
Moneypenny, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, as required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



                        /s/ Edward W. Moneypenny
                        ------------------------------------
                        Edward W. Moneypenny
                        Senior Vice President and Chief
                           Financial Officer
                        7-Eleven, Inc.






















                                       Tab 5