alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2921

___________ Winston Morrison, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: February 18, 1999 Filed: February 24, 1999

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Winston Morrison, a citizen of Freeport, Grand Bahamas, appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, in which he claimed his counsel was ineffective at resentencing for failing to raise his deportable-alien status as a basis for downwarddeparture. Upon de novo review, see United States v. Duke , 50 F.3d 571, 576 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 516 U.S. 885 (1995), we conclude denial was warranted. Among other things, Morrison cannot show he suffered prejudice by his counsel’s alleged deficient performance, because the district court indicated it would not have-2-

granted Morrison a downward departure on the basis of his alien status. See Au man v. United States , 67 F.3d 157, 162 (8th Cir. 1995) (counsel’s failure to object at sentencing to use of prior conviction as predicate offense was not ineffective assistance because no credible evidence pointed to conclusion that district court would have changed its ruling based on objection from counsel). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
NUMBER 13-13-00148-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

PROGRESSIVE COUNTY

INSURANCE CO., Appellant,

v.

RAUL ARANA, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 23rd District Court

of Matagorda County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Progressive County Mutual Ins. Co., filed an appeal from a judgment 

entered by the 23rd District Court of Matagorda County, Texas, in cause number

11-H-0260-C. Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds the appeal 

is moot. Appellee has not filed a response to the motion to dismiss.
2

The trial court signed a judgment in favor of appellee and against appellant on 

February 20, 2013. The trial court, on its own motion, granted a new trial on March 13, 

2013, while it still had plenary jurisdiction over the case. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b (c), (e). 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to 

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby 

DISMISSED AS MOOT. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). 

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

13th day of June, 2013.
Record of Disc ussion Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifi er: -AD



### With whom outside the FAA h as this AD action been discus sed ( i .e . , Design Approva l Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA , GAMA, e tc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DI SCUSSED BOErNG BRADY MITCHELL 9 / 23 /2015 RELEAS E OF SB REV. CALL MADE BY NICOLE PO TIER BOEING TIM HEN DRIX 9/30/2015 DLEE REQUEST FOR CONFIRMATION OF PART /SOFT WARE COSTS

Other / Additional Informati on:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cytation Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin
J. High, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Kevin J.
High                Kevin
J. HighPresident

August 1, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6441

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CLEVELAND LAQUINCY GRIFFIN, a/k/a Q,

 Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District 

Judge. (3:07-cr-00926-JFA-1; 3:10-cv-70281-JFA)

Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 31, 2012

Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cleveland Laquincy Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. John David Rowell, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cleveland LaQuincy Griffin seeks to appeal the 

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2011) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on April 25, 2011. The notice of appeal was filed on March 8, 

2012.*

 Because Griffin failed to file a timely notice of appeal 

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

 *

For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988). 
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gary Vogel, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Date: April 21, 2017





|By | /s/ Gary Vogel          | 
|-- | ----------------------- | 
|   | Gary Vogel,             | 
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5073 

To extend the suspension of duty on styrene, ar-ethyl-, polymer with 

divinylbenzene and styrene beads having low ash content and specifically 

manufactured for use as a specialty filler in lost wax mold casting 

applications in a variety of other specialty filler applications. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. GERLACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on styrene, ar-ethyl-, polymer with divinylbenzene and styrene beads having low 

ash content and specifically manufactured for use as 

a specialty filler in lost wax mold casting applications 

in a variety of other specialty filler applications. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5073 IH

1 SECTION 1. STYRENE, AR-ETHYL-, POLYMER WITH 

2 DIVINYLBENZENE AND STYRENE BEADS HAV3 ING LOW ASH CONTENT AND SPECIFICALLY 

4 MANUFACTURED FOR USE AS A SPECIALTY 

5 FILLER IN LOST WAX MOLD CASTING APPLI6 CATIONS IN A VARIETY OF OTHER SPECIALTY 

7 FILLER APPLICATIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.40 of the Har9 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

10 styrene, ar-ethyl-, polymer with divinylbenzene and sty11 rene beads having low ash content and specifically manu12 factured for use as a specialty filler in lost wax mold cast13 ing applications in a variety of other specialty filler appli14 cations) is amended by striking the date in the effective 

15 period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

18 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

19 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               4
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1262
<PP&E>                                             475
<DEPRECIATION>                                     128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              152
<BONDS>                                              2
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         15
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                        1395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1619
<SALES>                                            299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   299
<CGS>                                              148
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     65
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 40
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        40
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2023 WY 117

 October Term, A.D. 2023

December 7, 2023

LEANNA ROSE LaFLEUR,

Appellant

(Defendant),

v.

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee

(Plaintiff).

S-23-0186

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S 

ORDER TO REVOKE PROBATION

[¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that 

Appellant has not filed a pro se brief in the time allotted. Appellant took this appeal to 

challenge the district court’s June 8, 2023, Order to Revoke Probation. Appellant admitted 

she violated her probation. The district court revoked probation and imposed a sentence of 

two to four years on Appellant’s conviction for possession of a felony amount of 

methamphetamine. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-7-1031(c)(ii). The district court suspended that 

sentence in favor of two years of supervised probation.

[¶2] On October 2, 2023, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel e-filed a Motion 

to Withdraw as Counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 

1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently entered an Order Granting 

Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief. This Court ordered that, on or before 

November 16, 2023, Appellant may file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues 

for the Court to consider in this appeal. This Court also provided notice that, after the time 

for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would make its ruling on counsel’s motion to 

withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this appeal. This Court notes that 

Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted.
[¶3] Now, following a careful review of the record and the Anders brief submitted by 

appellate counsel, this Court finds appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be 

granted and the district court’s Order to Revoke Probation should be affirmed. It is, 

therefore, 

[¶4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel 

for Appellant Leanna Rose LaFleur, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record 

for Appellant; and it is further

[¶5] ORDERED that the Natrona County District Court’s June 8, 2023, Order to Revoke

Probation, be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

[¶6] DATED this 7th day of December, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

KATE M. FOX

Chief Justice
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

130314 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver & (74) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, ADRIAN ENERGY ASSO CIATES, L.L.C., Justices CADILLAC RENEWABLE ENERGY L.L.C., GENESEE POWER STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, GRAYLING GENERATING STATION, L.P., HILLMAN POWER COMPANY L. L.C., T.E.S. FILER CITY STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, VI KING ENERGY OF LINCOLN, INC., a nd VIKING ENERGY OF MCBAIN, INC., Appellants, SC: 130314 COA: 261718 MPSC Case No. 00-013917

v

MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, MIDLAND COGENERATION VENTURE, L.P., and ATTORNEY GENERAL, Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to a ppeal the January 11, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not p ersuaded that the question presented
should be reviewed by this Court.

l0221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2006

Clerk
#### Azid Ayad, Respondent, *v.*American Foreign Steamship Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

May 23, 1957.

*344
      *Corydon B. Dunham*and *Vine H. Smith*for appellant.

*Silas B. Axtell*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

At the opening of the trial the court was apprised of the plaintiff’s intention to amend his complaint so .as to include an additional cause of action in negligence. The denial of defendant’s motion for an adjournment, made before .any testimony was taken, and the granting of plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint at the close of his case over the objection of the defendant was an improper exercise of discretion. The defendant was entitled to a reasonable opportunity to ¡prepare its defense with respect to the new cause of action.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law .and new trial granted, with costs to the defendant to abide the .event.

Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

          - [I.D. 101000B]

The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of  Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for  collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork  Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

*Agency*: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).                

*Title*: Information for Share Transfer in Wreckfish Fishery.                

*Form Number(s)*: None.                

*OMB Approval Number*: 0648-0262.                

*Type of Request*: Regular submission.                

*Burden Hours*: 1.                

*Number of Respondents*: 4.                

*Average Hours Per Response*: 15 minutes.                

*Needs and Uses*:  The individual transferable quota system in the Southeast wreckfish fishery is based on percentage shares.  Persons holding shares may sell or otherwise transfer them to others, but information about the proposed transfer must be provided to NOAA.  The information is needed to manage the quota system, and information about the sales price is used in economic analyses.                

*Affected Public*: Business and other for-profit organizations, and  individuals.                

*Frequency*: On occasion.                

*Respondent's Obligation*: Mandatory.                

*OMB Desk Officer*: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.                

Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by calling or writing Madeleine Clayton, DOC Forms Clearance Officer,  (202) 482-3129, Department of Commerce, Room 6086, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at MClayton@doc.gov).

Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

Dated: October 6, 2000

Madeleine Clayton,

Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.

FR Doc. 00-26356 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,930,952
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      781,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        121,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,006,917
<PP&E>                                           4,519,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,266,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,805,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,240,156
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           272,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      (5,851,695)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,805,770
<SALES>                                          2,023,341
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,013,092
<CGS>                                            1,811,292
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,774,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 551,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (133,335)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (133,335)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (133,335)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .00
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 8.1
 Name of Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationMining Investments Jersey Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold Resources (UK) Limited
    
    United KingdomMorila Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsSociété des Mines de Morila SA
    
    Republic of MaliRandgold Resources (Côte dIvoire) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold Resources (Côte dIvoire) SARL
    
    Côte dIvoireSociété des Mines de Tongon SA
    
    Côte dIvoireRandgold Resources (Mali) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold Resources Mali SARL
    
    Republic of MaliKankou Moussa SARL
    
    Republic of MaliRandgold Resources (Senegal) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold Resources (Somilo) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsSociété des Mines de Loulo SA
    
    Republic of MaliRandgold Resources Tanzania (T) Limited
    
    TanzaniaSeven Bridges Trading 14 (Proprietary) Limited
    
    Republic of South AfricaRandgold Resources (Burkina) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold Resources Burkina Faso SARL
    
    Burkina FasoRandgold Resources T1 Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold Resources T2 Limited
    
    Republic of MaliRandgold Resources T3 Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel Islands
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5666 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Topramezone technical. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Topramezone technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TOPRAMEZONE TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 [3-4,5-dihydro-isoxazol-3- 

yl)-4-methylsulfonyl-2- 

methylphenyl](5-hydroxy-1- 

methyl-1H-pyrazole-4- 

yl)methanone 

(Topramezone technical) 

(CAS No. 210631–68–8) 

(provided for in subheading 2934.99.15) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5666 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS