alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED UNDER SEAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) 

INC., AND ZTE (TX), INC. 

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-487-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-488-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-489-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-490-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-491-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-492-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-493-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-494-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-495-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-496-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-497-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

FILED UNDER SEAL

REPLY SUPPORTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA Document 97 Filed 07/21/21 Page 1 of 4
1 

There is no merit to ZTE’s argument that WSOU is somehow to blame for the delay in the 

addressing The delay was caused by ZTE’s failure to produce it. 

There is also no merit to ZTE’s argument that it will be prejudiced by WSOU’s sur-reply 

because WSOU allegedly failed to (a) timely produce or (b) respond to ZTE’s 

request for “clarification” about the before ZTE’s deadline to file its reply. See 

Resp. at 3.

. ZTE could not possibly 

have been prejudiced by WSOU’s alleged failure to timely produce ZTE’s own document to ZTE. 

Regardless, there is no truth to ZTE’s allegation. 

.

1

 

ZTE also could not have been prejudiced by WSOU’s alleged failure to give ZTE

“clarification” about the before ZTE filed its reply brief. ZTE is a party to 

 Although WSOU 

did produce it to ZTE before ZTE’s deadline to file a reply, ZTE did not need WSOU to produce 

1

 To preserve resources, Exhibit A is being file only in the -487 case. 

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA Document 97 Filed 07/21/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA Document 97 Filed 07/21/21 Page 3 of 4
3

Therefore, WSOU respectfully requests the Court grant WSOU’s Motion for Leave to File 

Sur-Reply. 

Dated: July 14, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Ryan Loveless

James L. Etheridge 

Texas Bar No. 24059147 

Ryan S. Loveless 

Texas Bar No. 24036997 

Etheridge Law Group, PLLC 

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324 

Southlake, TX 76092 

Tel.: (817) 470-7249 

Fax: (817) 887-5950 

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered electronically 

via the U.S. District Court [LIVE]-Document Filing System to all counsel of record July 14, 2021.

/s/ Ryan Loveless

Ryan S. Loveless 

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA Document 97 Filed 07/21/21 Page 4 of 4
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134751 & (53) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

SHERITA WHITE and DERRICK WHITE, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134751 

 COA: 272114 

Oakland CC: 2005-064307-NI 

TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., 

PENSKE TRUCK LEASING COMPANY, L.P., 

and JAMES J. BIRKENHEUER,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed 

whether the Court of Appeals majority correctly ruled that MCR 2.116(C)(10) permits a 

trial court to deny summary disposition to the moving party even though the opposing 

party did not present countervailing evidence, on the ground that judgment is not 

appropriate under MCR 2.116(G)(4). 

The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this case on the March 2008 session 

calendar for argument and submission. Appellants’ brief and appendix must be filed no 

later than January 14, 2008, and appellees’ brief and appendix, if appellees choose to 

submit an appendix, must be filed no later than February 7, 2008. 

The Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., and the Michigan Association of 

Justice are invited to file briefs amicus curiae, to be filed no later than February 21, 2008. 

Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this 

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. 

t1128 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 30, 2007 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - Public Notice No. 3434] 

The Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC) will conduct an open meeting at 1 p.m. on Friday, November 3, in Room 24115, at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001. The purpose of the meeting is to finalize preparations for the 49th Session of the Technical Cooperation Committee (TCC 49) and 85th Session of Council of the International Maritime Organization (IMO). 

The TCC 49 meeting will be held at IMO Headquarters from 15-16 November 2000. The Technical Cooperation Committee will discuss the Integrated Technical Co-operation Program (ITCP) for 2002-2003. The committee will also discuss the Partnerships for Progress and the status of technical assistance activities provided by member States. Elections will be held for Chairman and Vice-Chairman for 2001. 

The 85th Session of the Council is scheduled for 13-17 November 2000, at the IMO Headquarters in London. Items of interest include Committees reports; the Report on the International Conference on the Revision of the International Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage, 1971; Work Program and Budget for 2001; and a review of the Organization's financial framework in accordance with Assembly resolution A.877(21). 

Members of the public may attend these meetings up to the seating capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by writing: Director, International Affairs, U. S. Coast Guard Headquarters, Commandant (G-CI), Room 2114, 2100 Second Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling: (202) 267-2280.

Dated: October 10, 2000. 

Stephen M. Miller, 

Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee. 

[FR Doc. 00-26494 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-07-U
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 29, 2017

No. 04-17-00657-CV

IN RE Mary Melinda Palacio AKA Melinda PALACIO,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PC2950

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Bernard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On October 10, 2017, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The Court is of the 

tentative opinion that a serious question concerning the requested relief requires further 

consideration. Therefore, the Court requests the filing of a response on or before December 20, 

2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1).

PER CURIUM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 15





Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, Northwest
Washington, D.C.  20549
Attention:  Document Control

Re:  The Southland Corporation Form 10-Q

We are aware that our report dated August 4, 1997 on our review of the 
condensed consolidated balance sheet of The Southland Corporation and 
Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997, and the related condensed consolidated 
statements of earnings for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 
30, 1997 and 1996, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows 
for the six-month periods ended June 30, 1997 and 1996, included in this Form 
10-Q, is incorporated by reference in the following registration statements.

							    REGISTRATION NO.
							    ----------------
     On Form S-8 for:

	  Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to The Southland
	  Corporation Equity Participation Plan                  33-23312

	  Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to The Southland
	  Corporation Grant Stock Plan                           33-25327

	  The Southland Corporation 1995 Stock Incentive Plan    33-63617

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should 
not be considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified 
by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Dallas, Texas
August 7, 1997



				    Tab 3
Exhibit 31.2  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Robin J. Harvey, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Rival Technologies Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:   July 6, 2007/s/ Robin J. Harvey
Robin J. Harvey
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1994
<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              209
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          233
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
                                               


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. (Five
Prime) for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Aron Knickerbocker, President and Chief Executive Officer of Five Prime, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Five Prime.

Dated: March 12, 2018



/s/ Aron KnickerbockerAron KnickerbockerPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
ex10-18_01

 

 

 



 

 

ex10-18_02

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

ex10-18_03

 

 

 



 

ex10-18_04

 

 

 



 

ex10-18_05

 

 

 



 

ex10-18_06

 

 

 



 

ex10-18_07

 

 

 



 

ex10-18_08

 

 

 

 



 

ex10-18_09

 

 

 

 



 

ex10-18_10

 

 

 



 

ex10-18_11

 

 

 



 

ex10-18_12

 

 

 



 

ex10-18_13

 

 



 

 

 

ex10-18_14

 

 



 

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Storage Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 26, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Patrick J. Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ PATRICK J. MARTIN 
Patrick J. MartinChief Executive Officer November 7, 2003
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

DIAMOND FLOORPLAN, INC., a New York Corporation

, Appellant,

v.

WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SERVICES d/b/a WESTLAKE SERVICES, LLC , Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 101

[ July 3, 2019 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; David E. French , Judge; L.T. Case
No. 50

- 2018

- CA

- 001528

.
Nathan D. Clark of Coral Reef Law Offices, P.A., Palmetto Bay, for appellant.

Tricia J. Duthiers a nd Elizabeth A. Henriques of Liebler Gonzalez & Portuondo, Miami, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , G ERBER and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```
Exhibit 3
```

```
CDMC Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates  Series
2002-4
```

```
Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions to
Certificateholders for 2002
```

```
Class   Interest          Principal PaidRealized    Ending Balance
        Distribution                    Losses
```

```
A1      3,177,998.43      11,485,213.23 0.00        88,514,786.77
A2      108,904.51        1,757,077.46  0.00        8,022,922.54
A3      291,721.24        0.00          0.00        8,022,922.54
A4      478,552.92        0.00          0.00        14,724,705.00
A5      1,131,179.88      7,028,309.87  0.00        32,091,690.13
A6      0.00              0.00          0.00        10,329,432.96
B1      87,541.03         14,088.48     0.00        2,685,343.52
B2      35,016.42         5,635.28      0.00        1,074,137.72
B3      20,426.26         3,287.24      0.00        626,580.76
B4      11,672.13         1,878.43      0.00        358,045.57
B5      8,754.13          1,408.82      0.00        268,535.18
B6      11,672.19         1,878.12      0.00        358,047.49
P       0.00              26,138.12     0.00        912,378.88
RI      0.27              50.00         0.00        0.00
RII     0.27              50.00         0.00        0.00
X       221,404.71        0.00          0.00        5,963,232.31
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5737 

To provide that a former Member of Congress receiving compensation as 

a highly paid lobbyist shall be ineligible to concurrently receive Federal 

retirement benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2012 

Mr. ISRAEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight 

and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that a former Member of Congress receiving 

compensation as a highly paid lobbyist shall be ineligible 

to concurrently receive Federal retirement benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Double 

5 Dipping Pension Prevention Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5737 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TAXPAYER-FUNDED PENSIONS 

2 FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS WHO BECOME 

3 HIGHLY PAID LOBBYISTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any former Member of Congress 

5 who is registered as a lobbyist, and whose annual income 

6 from lobbying activities exceeds $1,000,000, shall not be 

7 eligible to receive benefits under either the Civil Service 

8 Retirement System or the Federal Employees’ Retirement 

9 System for the period of time during which such former 

10 Member is employed as such a lobbyist and receiving from 

11 lobbying activities an annual income that exceeds 

12 $1,000,000. 

13 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the 

14 term ‘‘former Member of Congress’’ means an individual 

15 who becomes a former Member of Congress after the date 

16 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                           1,761
<SECURITIES>                                    32,056
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,264
<INVENTORY>                                     72,865
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,507
<PP&E>                                         133,008
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,924
<BONDS>                                          6,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,881
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,467
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,024
<SALES>                                        133,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,851
<CGS>                                           89,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,832
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,028
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,804
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,804
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.71
        

</TABLE>