alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6194

EDSON FURTADO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE

DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.

(1:07-cv-02755-RDB)

Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Furtado’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. Montgomery

County, Md., No. 1:07-cv-02755-RDB (D. Md. filed Jan. 14, 2008 &

entered Jan. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-23-00013-CR

Jeffrey Wayne NEWMAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 13, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 658978

Honorable Rosie S. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

SIGNED April 10, 2024.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 

 

 

FORM 10-Q/A 

 

X  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF 

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

 

OR 

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-7107 

 

 

SOUTHERN SCOTTISH INNS, INC. 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 

 

   **LOUISIANA
 **72-0711739**(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
 **(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 
**1726 Montreal Circle

Tucker, Georgia 30084

(Address of principal executive offices) 

(Zip Code) 

 
**(770) 938-5966 

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) 

 
**(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)**
 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes            No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes         No 

 

   **CLASS

  **SHARES OUTSTANDING****************
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Mann, Chief Financial Officer of Amarc Resources Ltd.
(the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 (the Annual Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 30, 2010

/s/ Paul
Mann         
_______________________________By:    Paul MannTitle:
Chief Financial Officer

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 00-69] 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 00-69 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

Dated: October 5, 2000.

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 60626)          ( print page 60627)          ( print page 60628)    

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M 

[FR Doc. 00-26170  Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
#### CALLAHAN v. STATE.

No. 23290.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 20, 1946.

J. W. McCullough, of McKinney, and Floyd Harry, of Farmersville, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was convicted on a charge of theft and assessed a fine of $25 and five days in jail by a jury in the County Court. The appeal contains a number of bills of exceptions which can not be considered because they were filed too late under the rules.

The complaint charges that Harry Callahan “ * * * did then and there unlawfully and fraudently take from the possession of Lerline Robinson, * * * • One lady’s wrist watch of the value of Twenty-Two Dollars and Fifty cents, * , * * without the consent of said injured party, and with the intent then and there * * * to deprive the said injured party of the value thereof and to appropriate the same to the use and benefit of him, the said defendant, against the peace and dignity of the State.”

The evidence in the case shows that Lerline Robinson sent the watch to appellant to be repaired; that she and her husband called for it a number of times; that *563appellant and the members of his family, at numerous -times, admitted the watch was there, sometimes representing that it was not repaired, and again, that a member of the family had it out of the shop, or some other excuse for not being able to deliver it. Finally they presented another watch which the prosecuting witness would not accept as her own, and it appears that -there was an eventual admission that the watch had been sold.

The question here raised is that the State alleged theft by fraudulently taking from the possession of Lerline Robinson, under Article 1410 of the Penal Code, and that the proof showed theft by bailee as defined by Article 1429 of -the Penal Code. We have frequently called attention to the complications raised by the various statutes on the subject of theft, and the confusion that arises because of them. The legislature has not seen fit to remove these complications and it is not for this court to make the law, we can only interpret it. The contention -that there is a conflict between the proof and the allegation must be sustained. The decisions on the subject are so numerous and consistent that we do' not now deem it necessary to discuss them.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
#### In the Matter of Jemrock Realty Corp., Appellant, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, J.), entered February 7, 1990, which dismissed a petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul an order by respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal which found an overcharge by the petitioner, unanimously affirmed, without costs and disbursements.

The issues raised in this proceeding, including the argument

*166that a 1984 amendment to Rent Stabilization Law § 26-516 (g) should have been applied by respondent, were disposed of in a recent appeal to which petitioner was a party, and require no further explication. *(See, Matter of Jemrock Realty Co. v Division of Hous. & Community Renewal,*166 AD2d 222.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Smith, JJ.
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey R. Mason, Chief Financial Officer of Amarc Resources
  Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)          
  the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended March
  31, 2005 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and

(ii)          
  the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:  | September 12, 2005        | 
|------ | ------------------------- | 
|       |                           | 
|       |                           | 
|       | /s/
      Jeffrey R Mason | 
|By:    | Jeffrey R. Mason          | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer   | 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---



---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5439 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5439

        To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Dimethomorph.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Dimethomorph.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIMETHOMORPH.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        4-[3-(4-            Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          chlorophenyl)-3-                                                  12/31/2015
                          (3,4-
                          dimethoxyphenyl)-
                          1-oxo-2-
                          propenyl]morpholi
                          ne (Dimethomorph)
                          (CAS No. 110488-
                          70-5) (provided
                          for in subheading
                          2934.99.12)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 00-68]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 00-68 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

Dated: October 5, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 60623)          ( print page 60624)          ( print page 60625)    
 

 

 

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[FR Doc. 00-26169  Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
, J. REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND REMAND for proceedings consistent with this order. 1

Saitta PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring:

For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, NA., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal. 

### li s bamACknarrim=3,4J. Parraguirre cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd. Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Ballard Spahr, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk 'The injunction imposed by our March 3, 2014, order is vacated.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
#### WRIGHT v. STATE.

No. 26703.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 16, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of robbery by assault, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

vs. Case No.:

ORDER

BE IT REMEMBERED on this day, there was presented to the Court the Motion for 

Admission Pro Hac Vice filed by , counsel for 

 , and the Court, having reviewed the motion, enters

the following order: 

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED, and

 may appear on behalf of 

 in the above case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that , if he/she

has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S.

District Court, in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-l(f)(2).

SIGNED this the day of , 20 .

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Anna Gonzalez and Ronald K. Page, Plaintiffs

5:20-cv-00617

State Farm Life Insurance Company, 

Defendant Sophia G. Gold Anna Gonzalez and Ronald K. Page Sophia G. Gold Anna Gonzalez and Ronald K. Page Sophia G. Gold JanuaryUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

21

Case 5:20-cv-00617-FB-ESC Document 69-1 Filed 01/04/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.2

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust
National Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Motorola Debenture-Backed Series 2002-12 Trust (the Trust), certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed by
Lehman ABS Corporation in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report of the Trust;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or
similar agreement for inclusion in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my knowledge, except as
disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 1, 2013



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ David J. Kolibachuk            
|David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0583 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TAYLOR JAY DAMM,

Defendant and Appellant .

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until January 12, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court December 11 2023

12/11/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0583
p. 1 

# Or'/9'Zbo7-053/ The Dow

Chemical Company 727 Norristown Rd. PO . Box 904 Spring House, PA 19477

U.S .A. 

# RECD MAP 15 2011

March 7, 2011 Via FedEx 

# rn~333%ll

Document Control Office (7407M) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics ~ (D ~ EPA East Building, Rm6428 1201 Constitution Ave., NW 

### Washington, DC 20460 s' . `3 " C = Corn

- Attention: TSCA Section 4 - Subject : Methanone, diphenyl- (CASON 119-61-9) Dear Sir/Madam

: In response to the January 7, 2011 Final Rule on Testing of Certain High Production Volume Chemicals (76 FR 1067) and promulgated under TSCA Section 4(a), The Dow Chemical Company (Dow) is submitting this letter of intent to test methanone, diphenyl- (CASRN 119-61-9), also commonly known as benzophenone . The tests specified include: " Ready biodegradation " Aquatic toxicology Dow is an importer of benzophenone and based on the public information fromthe 2006 IUR report, imports about 10%of the total volume reported. Dow looks forward to working with other Tier 1 companies who will be identified through this test rule to share the costs of the required testing. If you have questions or require additional information please contact me. Sincerely, 

# ~ qA? 6~ ~IIII4IYIIIIIIIIIIIRIIIIIIIRIIIIIIII,I~IYIIII Jeffery H

. Hafer Global Product Leader Dow Coating Materials/The Dow Chemical Company Phone: (215) 619-5552/Fax# (215) 619-1675 jhafergdow

.com 

# CONTAINS NOCg1