alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TAYLOR v. STATE.

No. 23321.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 3, 1946.

C. R. Carpenter, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of assault to murder and sentenced to two yea'rs in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exception. The proceedings appear regular. Nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF 
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Paul Mann, Chief Financial Officer of Amarc Resources Ltd.
(the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

(i)          
the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2014 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)          the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:  | July 17, 2014           | 
|------ | ----------------------- | 
|       |                         | 
|       | /s/ Paul
    Mann       | 
|       |                         | 
|By:    | Paul Mann               | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer | 



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00623
- CV

In re J. B.

OR I GINAL PROCEEDING FRO M BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator J. B. has filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to have this Court (1) vac a te t he trial court ’ s temporary order granting the Texas Department of Family and
Prot ective S ervices temporary conservatorship of J.B. ’ s child , (2) instruct the trial c ourt to return the child to J. B

. , and (3) instruct the trial court to dismiss the Depar t ment ’ s case . In the mandamus petition, J.B. asserts that the trial court abused its discr etion by issuing the July 15, 2019 temporary order without making a finding based on sufficient evidence that

“ reasonable efforts, consistent with the circumstances a nd providing for the safety of the child, were made to prevent or elimina te the need for removal of the child

. ” Tex. Fam. Code § 262.102 (a)(4). However, J.B. states that the trial court held a hearing on August 8, 2019, a t which it denied motions filed b y J.B. and allowed the Department to maintain control over the chil d. Wh en J.B. ’ s petition for writ of manda mus was filed, t he Court instructed him that the petition did not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.7(a)(2), which establishes that “ Relator must file with the petition:

. . . (2) a properly authenticated transcript of any2

relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence,

or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the m a tter complained. ” N o transcript from the hearing has been submitted to t his Court, nor has a statement been submitted that no testimony was adduced in connection with the complained

- of matter. As the part y seeking relief, J.B. has the bur den of providin g this C ourt with a sufficient record to establish his right to mandamus r elief. See Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). He has failed to do so, and i n the absence o f an adequ ate record, w e are unable to determine that J.B. is entitled to m andamus relief

. Accordingly, on this record, we deny the petition for wr it of mandamus

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8 (a)

.

____________ ___________________ ___________ Melissa Goodwin, J ustice Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly Filed: September 27, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                59,696
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        138,432
<ALLOWANCES>                           7,498
<INVENTORY>                          118,667
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     465,598
<PP&E>                             2,938,151
<DEPRECIATION>                     1,415,119
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     2,301,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                821,888
<BONDS>                            1,966,788
<COMMON>                                  41
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                          (683,762)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       2,301,168
<SALES>                            3,439,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   3,483,359
<CGS>                              2,439,345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      2,439,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     977,310
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    44,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       22,039
<INCOME-TAX>                           8,307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   13,732
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       17,871
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          31,603
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.08 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.07 <F2>
<FN>
<F1> BASIC EPS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS (BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM) IS .04
<F2> DILUTED EPS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS (BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM) IS .03
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ERIC FLORES,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 21

- 00133

- CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20110D01621)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We

further order this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30 TH DAY OF AUGUST , 20 21

.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Alley JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

906 CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE

The undersigned officer of SPS Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies to my knowledge that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date:     November 5, 2003    

Name:   /s/John S. Thompson
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel Comparative Medicine.                    

*Date:*                         February 10, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 PM to 3 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sybil A. Wellstood, PHD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965, 301-435-0814.                     

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. 

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 28, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-2625  Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
January 24, 2010

MEMORANDUM TO: Air Docket EP A - HQ - OAR- 2005 - 0161 SUBJECT: Domestic Agricultural Projections from the Forest and

Agricultural Sector Optimization Model (FASOM) This memorandum accompanies a spreadsheet on the docket that includes model results from the FASOM model. FASOM results were used to estimate lifecy cle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions produced by the domestic agricultural sector. These model results were input into a separate impact calculation spreadsheet to convert the results to GHG emissions estimates. For more information about FASOM modeling for l ifecy cle GHG anal ys is refer to RIA Chapter 2

.
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Peter P. Smetek, Jr., CEO and
Chairman of Larrea Biosciences Corporation, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the
following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
April 30, 2005.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in
all respects, the financial condition of Larrea Biosciences Corporation and results of its
operations.

Date: October 25, 2006/s/ Peter P. Smetek, Jr.CEO and Chairman
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

WAYNE E. DRIGGERS, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D22-647 

LT Case No. 2010-CF-003329-A 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed September 13, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Marion County, 

Lisa D. Herndon, Judge.

Wayne E. Driggers, Blountstown,

pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended on September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and to which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Sarah H. Moore, the principal financial officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 4, 2003



/s/    SARAH H. MOORE

---

Sarah H.
Moore

Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and will be retained by The Colonial
BancGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5556 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5556

       To suspend temporarily the duty on hybrid golf club heads.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Bilbray (for himself and Mr. Neal) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on hybrid golf club heads.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HYBRID GOLF CLUB HEADS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Hybrid golf club    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          heads (provided                                                   12/31/2015
                          for in subheading
                          9506.39.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### F. W. Woolworth Co., Appellant, *v.*Murray Menschik, Doing Business as Joell Mfg. Co., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 27, 1957.

*Edward Friedman*for appellant.

*Hyman J. Fliegel*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Defendant as a statutory tenant was required to serve upon the landlord a 30-day written notice by registered mail of his intention to vacate the space occupied by him. His failure to do so imposes upon him liability for the payment of an additional month’s rent (Business Rent Law, § 8, subd. [g]; L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.).

The judgment should be modified by increasing the recovery to the sum of $180, with costs, and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to appellant.

Hecht, Aubelio and Tilzeb, JJ., concur.

Judgment modified, etc.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 198 (Thursday, October 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Citizen Advocacy Panel, Brooklyn District

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Brooklyn District Citizen Advocacy 
Panel will be held in Brooklyn, New York.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, November 16, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen Cain at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-
488-3555.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an operational meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held 
Thursday, November 16, 2000, 6:00 p.m. to 9:20 p.m. at the Internal 
Revenue Service Brooklyn Building located at 625 Fulton Street, 
Brooklyn, NY 11201. For more information or to confirm attendance, 
notification of intent to attend the meeting must be made with Eileen 
Cain. Mrs. Cain can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555. The 
public is invited to make oral comments from 8:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on 
Thursday, November 16, 2000. Individual comments will be limited to 5 
minutes. If you would like to have the CAP consider a written 
statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555, or write Eileen 
Cain, CAP Office, P.O. Box R, Brooklyn, NY 11201.
    The Agenda will include the following: various IRS issues.

    Note: Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could 
prevent effective advance notice.


    Dated: October 5, 2000.
M. Cathy Vanhorn,
Director, CAP, Communications & Liaison, Taxpayer Advocate Service.
[FR Doc. 00-26205 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended on March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and to which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Robert E. Lowder, the
principal executive officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 9, 2007



/s/    ROBERT E.
LOWDERRobert E. Lowder Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and will be retained by The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### MAGGARD v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 4, 1953.

Isaac Turner, Hyden, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Atty. Gen., Zeb A. Stewart, Asst. Atty. Gen., G. R. Drinnon, Mid-dlesboro, for appellee.

DUNCAN; Justice.

Appellant was convicted and sentenced to one year in the penitentiary for the offense of issuing a worthless check payable to Luther Jamerson in the amount of $55.41. KRS 434.070. Several grounds are urged for reversal, only one of which will be discussed.

Appellant operated a coal mine under a lease from.Cutshin Coal Company, and the check was given in payment of wages previously earned by Jamerson for loading coal and working in the mines. A necessary element of the offense is an intent to defraud, and it is well settled that when a check is given in payment of a debt without simultaneously obtaining money or property, the offense is not complete. Commonwealth v. Hammock, 198 Ky. 785, 250 S.W. 85. The check in this case was merely in payment of a debt, and its issuance is not punishable under the statute.

The judgment is reversed.
#### RODRIQUEZ v. STATE.

No. 26470.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 17, 1953.

E. A. Blair, Lubbock, for appellant.

Wesley Dice,’State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to murder with malice upon Rudolph Vargas, and his punishment was assessed at three years in the penitentiary.

In view of the disposition we make of this case, it is not necessary to here set out the facts.

The evidence raised the issué of an attack upon appellant with an iron pipe. In the event the jury found that an attack was made upon appellant with an iron pipe, then the evidence raised the further issue of whether the character of the iron pipe and the manner of its use was reasonably calculated to produce death or serious bodily injury. If it was so found, then under Art. 1223, P.C., it would be presumed that the person using it designed to inflict injury.

Appellant timely directed his exception to the charge of the court, thereby pointing out the court’s failure to apply the law under Art. 1223, P.C., to the facts, and therein advise the jury that if they found that appellant was attacked with a pipe which, from the manner of its use, was an instrument calculated to produce death or serious bodily injury, then the law presumed that the person using it intended to injure or kill appellant. Such failure to so instruct the jury was error. Mason v. State, 88 Tex.Cr.R. 642, 228 S.W. 952; Hoobler v. State, 114 Tex.Cr.R. 94, 24 S.W.2d 413; Hawkins v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 32 S.W.2d 202; Pinkston v. State, 125 Tex.Cr.R. 472, 69 S.W.2d 60; Green v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 218, 97 S.W.2d 233; McFarland v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 309, 104 S.W.2d 879; Maxey v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 27, 133 S.W.2d 785; Branch’s Ann.P.C., p. 1068.

For the error pointed out above, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5395 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on E-5-(4-Chlorobenzylidene)- 

2,2-dimethyl-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol- 1-ylmethyl)cyclopentanol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on E-5-(4- 

Chlorobenzylidene)-2,2-dimethyl-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol- 1- 

ylmethyl)cyclopentanol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. E-5-(4-CHLOROBENZYLIDENE)-2,2-DIMETHYL-1- 

4 (1H-1,2,4-TRIAZOL- 1- 

5 YLMETHYL)CYCLOPENTANOL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.99 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 E-5-(4-Chlorobenzylidene)-2,2-dimethyl-1-(1H-1,2,4- 

9 triazol- 1-ylmethyl)cyclopentanol) is amended by striking 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5395 IH

1 the date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/ 

2 31/2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS