alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2351

In Re: CHARLES KEITH,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:97-cr-00004-IMK-JSK-1)

Submitted: March 13, 2009 Decided: April 6, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Keith, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: After this court in 2005 vacated seven of the eighteen counts on which Charles Keith was convicted in 1997, the district court denied Keith’s motion for resentencing. Keith now has filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to strike the vacated counts from his judgment, refund the special assessment imposed on the vacated counts, and resentence him under the advisory federal sentencing guidelines. We conclude that Keith is not entitled

to mandamus relief. Mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist.

Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus relief is available only where there is no other available remedy. In re Braxton , 258 F.3d 250, 261 (4th Cir. 2001). Because Keith had other means of pursuing the relief he sought, namely to file an appeal from the district court’s order denying his motion for resentencing, mandamus

relief is not available. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

23 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5503 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1,3–Propanediaminium, N-[3- 

[[[dimethyl[3-[(2-methyl-1-oxo-2-propenyl)amino] propyl] 

ammonio]acetyl]amino]propyl]-2-hydroxy-N,N,N’,N’,N’-pentamethyl-, trichloride, polymer with 2-propenamide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. SCHMIDT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1,3– 

Propanediaminium, N-[3-[[[dimethyl[3-[(2-methyl-1-oxo2-propenyl)amino] propyl] 

ammonio]acetyl]amino]propyl]-2-hydroxy-N,N,N’,N’,N’- 

pentamethyl-, trichloride, polymer with 2-propenamide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5503 IH

1 SECTION 1. 1,3–PROPANEDIAMINIUM, N-[3-[[[DIMETHYL[3- 

2 [(2-METHYL-1-OXO-2-PROPENYL)AMINO]- 

3 PROPYL]AMMONIO]ACETYL]AMINO]PROPYL]- 

4 2-HYDROXY-N,N,N’,N’,N’-PENTAMETHYL-, TRI5 CHLORIDE, POLYMER WITH 2-PROPENAMIDE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,3–Propanediaminium, N- 

[3-[[[dimethyl[3-[(2-methyl-1-oxo-2-propenyl)amino]propyl]- 

ammonio]acetyl]amino]propyl]-2- 

hydroxy-N,N,N’,N’,N’- 

pentamethyl-, trichloride, 

polymer with 2- 

propenamide (CAS No. 

916155–61–8) (provided 

for in subheading 

3906.90.50) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

12 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order entered February 26, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00029-CR

EX PARTE FRANK DELVIS MAY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 003-2371-2012

ORDER

Appellant’s February 20, 2013 motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief is 

GRANTED to the extent of the following relief.

The Court has received information that the court reporter has undergone medical 

treatment and will need an extension of time to prepare the reporter’s record. We EXTEND the 

time to file the reporter’s record to April 25, 2013. Appellant’s brief shall be due by May 24, 

2013. The State’s brief shall be due by June 24, 2013. If any party does not file its brief by the 

date specified, the appeal will be submitted without that party’s brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 31.1.

The appeal is REMOVED from its current submission date of April 1, 2013. The appeal 

will be submitted without oral argument on August 1, 2013 before a panel consisting of Chief 

Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Evans. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.2.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Denise 

Condran, official court reporter, County Court at Law No. 3, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.5
                                                      Pittway Corporation
                                                      September 30, 1999
                                                      Form 10-Q


                       PITTWAY CORPORATION
                     CHANGE OF CONTROL PLAN
                           ACCEPTANCE


     The undersigned, who is a party to an Employment Agreement
with Pittway Corporation ("Pittway") dated as of January 1, 1998,
as amended as of March 18, 1999, and who has been designated by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Pittway
to participate in the Pittway Corporation Change of Control Plan
that became effective September 15, 1999 (the "Plan"), hereby
accepts the terms of the Plan.

     Dated: October 24, 1999.


                              Edward J. Schwartz
# A p p e n d i x E



# D r a f t C o m p a n y R e p o r t : S u m m a r y o f B a s e l i n e

E m i s s i o n s a n d P r o d u c t C o n t e n t

O c t o b e r 2 0 1 1

N O N C B I2010/15PFOAGlobalStewardshipProgramDraftCompanyReport:SummaryofBaselineEmissionsandProductContentSECTION1:REPORTDATEOctober2011SECTION2:COMPANYIDENTIFICATIONCompanyNameSOLVAYSOLEXIS,INC.2aStreetAddress10LEONARDLANEWESTDEPTFORD,NJ08086SECTION3:SUMMARYOFEMISSIONSReportingPeriod(usecalendaryear-e.g.Jan1,2000toDec31,2000)JAN1,2010TODEC31,2010ReleasestoallenvironmentalmediafromfluoropolymerandtelomermanufactureOperationsChemicalcategorykgs1mersfluoropolyofkgscategoryofkgstelomersofkgscategoryofkgsPFOAandPFOAsaltsNANANAHigherhomologues>100kgs–1000kgs0.01–0.000001NA3aU.S.facilitiesPrecursorsNANANAPFOAandPFOAsaltsNANANAHigherhomologuesNANANA3bNon-U.S.facilitiesPrecursorsNANANAPleaseprovideinformationonthemethods,assumptions,uncertaintiesanddetectionlimitsforthedataprovidedabove.3cAnalyticalmethodsutilizedtodeveloptheyear2007datawerebasedonextraction,esterificationandLCMS.Limitsofdetectionrangefrom50ppbinwaterto4ppminsolidsandaqueousdispersions.SECTION4:SUMMARYOFPRODUCTCONTENTReportingPeriod(usecalendaryear-e.g.Jan1,2000toDec31,2000)JAN1,2010TODEC31,2010ProducttypeFluoropolymerdispersionsOtherfluoropolymers1Telomerbasedproducts4aProductionvolume(kgs/year)2>1,000,000>1,000,000NAConcentration3OperationsChemicalcategoryFluoropolymerdispersions4(ppmwet-weight)Otherfluoropolymers1,5(ppbdry-weight)Telomerbasedproducts6(ppbdry-weight)PFOA,PFOAsaltsandhigherhomologues<10ppm<5ppmNA4bU.S.facilitiesPrecursors000PFOA,PFOAsaltsandhigherhomologuesNANANA4cNon-U.S.facilitiesPrecursorsNANANAPleaseprovideinformationonthemethods,assumptions,uncertaintiesanddetectionlimitsforthedataprovidedabove.4dProductcontentisreportedforproductsmanufacturedand/orimportedbySolvaySolexis,Inc.in2009.1FluoropolymersmanufacturedwithPFOA.2Usethefollowingranges:(1)Zero(2)>0–10kgs;(3)>10kgs–100kgs;(4)>100kgs–1,000kgs;(5)>1,000kgs–10,000kgs;(6)>10,000kgs–100,000kgs;(7)>100,000kgs–1,000,000kgs;(8)Over1,000,000kgs.3Concentrationshouldreflecttheconcentrationofchemicalintheproductassoldbythereportingcompany.Ifthereportingcompanyhasinformationconcerningtheconcentrationofchemicalintheproductasusedbyothers–forexample,asincorporatedbydilutionintoaformulation–thatadditionalinformationwouldalsobehelpful.4Thisvalueshouldbeexpressedasaweightedaverageconcentrationandrange.5Thisvalueshouldbeexpressedasamaximumconcentration.6Thisvalueshouldbeexpressedasasimple(notweighted)averageandrange.
WACHOVIA          8739 Research Drive
	Charlotte, NC 28288
SECURITIES	
 
**Commercial Loan Servicing

 

Management's Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, Wachovia Bank National Association    (the Bank) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) *Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* (USAP), except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.I., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans. As of and for this same period, the Bank                        had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $200       million and $20 million, respectively.

 

 
*John M. Church					March 10, 2003
                  John M. Church					Date

Managing Director/ Senior Vice President

  Wachovia Bank National Association

 

 
*Timothy S. Ryan					March 10, 2003
                Timothy S. Ryan					Date

           Director/Vice President

  Wachovia Bank National Association

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wachovia Services is the trade name under which Wachovia Corporation conducts its investment banking, capital markets and institutional securities business 

Through First Union Securities, Inc. ("FUSI"), member NYSE, NASD, SIPC and through other bank and non bank and broker dealer subsidiaries of Wachovia Corporation,

Including Wachovia Bank, N.A. and First Union National Bank.****
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

BRYNNE SOUKUP,

 Plaintiff,

v.

FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. AND 

FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS, LLC,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 1:20-CV-648-RP

ORDER

ON THIS DAY came to be considered Defendant Flight Services & System’s LLC’s

Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support. Having considered the motion, response, record of the case, 

and relevant law, the Court finds that the motion is not well-taken and should be DENIED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Compel is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED THIS _____ DAY OF _________________, 2020. 

________________________________

PRESIDING JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 22-3 Filed 10/21/20 Page 1 of 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5630 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an increased penalty 

in certain cases of fraudulent understatement of a taxpayer’s liability 

by a tax return preparer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. BOUSTANY, and Mr. LEWIS

of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an increased penalty in certain cases of fraudulent understatement of a taxpayer’s liability by a tax return preparer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fighting Tax Fraud 

5 Act of 2012’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5630 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTY FOR CERTAIN FRAUDULENT 

2 UNDERSTATEMENTS OF TAXPAYER’S LIABIL3 ITY BY TAX RETURN PREPARER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6694 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating sub6 sections (c), (d), (e), and (f) as subsections (d), (e), (f), 

7 and (g), respectively, and by inserting after subsection (b) 

8 the following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(c) UNDERSTATEMENT DUE TO FRAUD.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Any tax return preparer 

11 who prepares any return or claim for refund with re12 spect to which any part of an understatement of li13 ability is due to conduct described in paragraph (2) 

14 shall pay (in addition to any other penalties) a pen15 alty with respect to each such return or claim in an 

16 amount equal to the greater of— 

17 ‘‘(A) $5,000, or 

18 ‘‘(B) the amount of such understatement 

19 of liability. 

20 ‘‘(2) FRAUDULENT CONDUCT.—Conduct is de21 scribed in this paragraph if such conduct consists 

22 of— 

23 ‘‘(A) a willful modification of any return or 

24 claim for refund which— 

25 ‘‘(i) creates an understatement of li26 ability, and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5630 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) is made by the tax return pre2 parer after such return or claim has been 

3 signed by the taxpayer, and 

4 ‘‘(B) a willful attempt by the tax return 

5 preparer to receive the proceeds of a refund any 

6 portion of which is attributable to such under7 statement of liability.’’. 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Subsections (d) 

9 and (e) of section 6694 of such Code, as redesignated by 

10 subsection (a), are each amended by striking ‘‘subsection 

11 (a) or (b)’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘subsection 

12 (a), (b), or (c)’’. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to returns and claims prepared 

15 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         531,383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               724,113
<PP&E>                                         528,266
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,230,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          790,616
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 12,709,980
<COMMON>                                         9,876
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,035,634
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,230,481
<SALES>                                        181,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               181,646
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,167,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,772,431)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,772,431)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2****CFO Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)**I, Charles Wimer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Access National Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.     Date: March 28, 2006 /s/ Charles Wimer     Charles Wimer    Executive Vice President and Chief    Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MONTAY LEE BAILEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 162 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MONTAY BAILEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 163 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of October, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133348-49 & (66) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff, Stephen J. Markman, Counter Defendant-Appellant, Justices v SC: 133348-49 

 COA: 260766, 261504 

Oakland CC: 02-039177-CZ 

A&A MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION 

SERVICES, INC., RENAISSANCE PHYSICAL

THERAPY, L.L.C., RAHAT MALIK, 

PHYSICIANS REHABILITATION, L.L.C., 

ZUBAIR RATHUR, IMAN FAWAZ, and FIRST

CHOICE REHAB, INC.,

Defendants, 

Counter Plaintiffs-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Miller v Allstate (After Remand) 

(Docket Nos. 134393, 134406), is pending on appeal before this Court and that the 

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case. 

t1114 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 21, 2007 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5671 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5671

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on methyl-4-trifluoro 
              methoxyphenyl-N-(chlorocarbonyl) carbamate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on methyl-4-trifluoro 
              methoxyphenyl-N-(chlorocarbonyl) carbamate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYL-4-TRIFLUORO METHOXYPHENYL-N-(CHLOROCARBONYL) 
              CARBAMATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to methyl-4-trifluoro 
methoxyphenyl-N-(chlorocarbonyl) carbamate) is amended by striking the 
date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CAUSE NUMBER 12-0006

CHADRffiMENSCHNEIDER,ETUX IN THE DISTRICT COURT

REBEKAH RIEMENSCHNEIDER

VS. OF

EVERETT PERRY RAMSEY, M.D., £3

EAST TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER .L o§

HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATES, INC., '->

TIM MEYER, INDIVIDUALLY r^

AND EAST TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER H?

CROCKETT, INC. HOUSTON COUNTY, TEXAg

ORDER ON DEFENDANT. EAST TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER CROCKETT. INC's.

74.35lfb) MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendant, East Texas Medical Center Crockett, Inc., presented its §74.3 l(b) Motion to

Dismiss. The court believes the same should be denied.

The Court specifically finds that Plaintiffs filed an Original Petition on January 12,2012

including East Texas Medical Center Crockett, Inc., as party Defendant, and that Plaintiffs'

First Amended Petition filed on February 14,2012 removing East Texas Medical Center

Crockett, Inc., occurred based upon representations by Defendant that East Texas Medical Center

Crockett, Inc. was not proper party. The Court further finds that Plaintiffs were informed by

Defendant on July 25, 2012 that the physician assistant, Tim Meyer, was in fact an employee of

East Texas Medical Center Crockett, Inc, and that Plaintiffs filed Second Amended Petition on

July 31, 2012 naming East Texas Medical Center Crockett, Inc. and Tim Meyer, P.A. as party

Defendants. The Court further finds Plaintiffs served on East Texas Medical Center Crockett,

Inc. and Defendant, Tim Meyer, an expert report on August 14, 2012. The Court finds that the

120 day deadline for filing an expert report as to East Texas Medical Center Crockett, Inc, began

on January 12,2012, the date of the Original Petition, and was tolled on February 14,2012.when

Plaintiffs amended out East Texas Medical Center, Crockett, Inc., based upon representations

made to Plaintiffs by Defendant and that the 120 clock resumed again on July 31, 2012 when

Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Petition renaming East Texas Medical Center Crockett,

Inc. and naming Tim Meyer, P.A.. Tho Court finds that Defend ants,-Bast Toxaa Medical Center ffr

-Gfockctt^ Inc. and Tim Meyer were ocrved with expert reports prior to the passage of 120 days.,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that East Texas

Medical Center Crockett, Inc.'s §74.351(b) Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.

Signed this the day of KjA^UA^I 2013.

Presiding Judge