alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION

JORDAN SMITH, individually and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated,

 Plaintiffs,

v. 

RETURN DISPOSAL, LLC and TOBEN 

SCOTT

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 

 

No. MO:20-CV-00145-DC-RCG

 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff Jordan Smith and Defendants Return Disposal LLC

and Toben Smith’s (collectively, “parties”) Joint Motion for Court Approval of Settlement 

Agreement. (Doc. 8). After due consideration, the Court GRANTS the parties’ Joint Motion for 

Court Approval of Settlement Agreement. Id.

Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. 

§ 201 et seq., by failing to pay him an overtime premium for hours worked in excess of forty 

hours in a workweek. (Doc. 1). On December 2, 2020 the Court granted the parties’ Joint Motion 

for Leave to File Settlement Agreement under Seal. (Text Order dated December 2, 2020). 

Subsequently, the parties’ filed a Consent to Trial by United States Magistrate Judge and the 

Sealed Settlement Agreement was docketed. (Docs. 9, 10). The parties now move the Court to 

approve their Settlement Agreement. (Doc. 8). 

The Court reviewed the proposed Settlement Agreement and finds that the settlement of 

this action is fair to all parties, reasonably resolves a bona fide disagreement between the parties 

concerning the merits of the claims asserted in this action, and demonstrates a good faith 

intention by the parties to fully and finally resolve all claims asserted. (Doc. 10).

Case 7:20-cv-00145-DC-RCG Document 11 Filed 12/08/20 Page 1 of 2
2

It is therefore ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement 

Agreement is GRANTED. (Doc. 8). 

Further, the Settlement Agreement is APPROVED. (Doc. 10).

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED this 8th day of December, 2020.

RONALD C. GRIFFIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00145-DC-RCG Document 11 Filed 12/08/20 Page 2 of 2
Served: May 2, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------ 

### ISLAND AIRLINES, LLC

-----------------------------------------------------------



### NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On April 2 7

, 2012

, Island Airlines, LLC (“ IA ”)

, a U.S. commuter air carrier, 1 request ed that the

Department regist e r the trade name “ Ocean Wings Air Charter ” for use in certain of its operations

.

Part 215 (14 CFR Part 215) of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier wishing to

use an alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule further

states that the Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly

named air carriers of the proposed use of the name.

In support of its request, IA states that Coastal Wings , Inc. d/b/a Ocean Wings , an air taxi operator

in Massachusetts, has given IA permission to use the requested trade name, and has voluntarily

surrender ed its Part 135 operating cer tificate issued by the Federal Aviation Administration

(“FAA”)

. 2

Since IA has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of the

trade name “ Ocean Wings Air Charter ” for use by IA

.

Dated at Washington, D.C.

, May 2, 2012

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http:// www.regulations.gov

1 See Order 2010

- 2

- 12 , issued on November 22, 2010.

2 The FAA states that Coastal Wings surrender ed its Part 135 Operating Certificate on April 23, 2012.Attachment A

SERVICE LIST FOR ISLAND AIRLINES, LLC.

MR GARY B. GAROFALO

MR VICTOR H. SMITH

GAROFALO GOERLICH HAINBACH

1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVENUE NW

WASHINGTON DC 20036 OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR STEPHEN K BROWN

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

ONE CRA NBERRY HILL SUITE 40 2

LEXINGTON MA 02421

- 7394 MR WILLIAM J WEBER

CERTIFICATION MANAGE R

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

MR PETER LYNCH

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR E NFORCEMENT

FAA

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591Subject: ACTION : Notice of Trade Name Registration

– Island

Airlines, LLC. Date:

From: Todd M. Homan

Office of Aviation Analysis Reply to

Attn. of: Katy O’Toole

X

- 56, x69998

To: Renee Wright

Program Manager, Docket Operations

Please issue the attached notice announcing the registration of the trade name “Ocean Wings Air

Charter” by Island Airlines, LLC. My staff will serve the notice.

Attachment
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5318 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5318

        To suspend temporarily the duty on ethylhexylglycerine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Smith of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on ethylhexylglycerine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Ethylhexylglycerin  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          e (3-(2-                                                          12/31/2014
                          ethylhexyloxy)pro
                          pane-1,2-diol)
                          (CAS No. 70445-33-
                          9) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2905.39.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cytation Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kevin J. High, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Kevin J.
High                Kevin
J. HighPresident

December 19, 2005
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE CONTRERAS

- CASTRO, AKA Jose Castro, AKA Jose Alfredo Contreras,

Petitioner,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 73568 Agency No. A205

- 310

- 240

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 26, 2016 **
Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Jose Contreras

- Castro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal

and relief under the Conven tion Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 3 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 73568

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039

- 40 (9th Cir. 2010) , and w e deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on Contreras

- Castro’s omission of a knife attack from his written statement
and his testimon y on direct and cross

- examination

. See Shrestha , 590 F.3d at 1048 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the “totality of circumstances.”) ; Kin v. Holder , 595 F.3d 1050, 1056

- 57 (9th Cir. 2010) (omission

of crucial facts from application constituted substantial evidence supporting

adv erse credibility determination)

. Contreras

- Castro ’s explanation for the

omission do es not compel a contrary result. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). In the absence of credible testimony , in this case, Contreras

Castro’s withholding of removal claim fail s
. See Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Contreras

- Castro ’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same testimony the agency found not credible, and the record does not otherwise compel the conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to3 14

- 73568

Mexico

. See id. at 1156

- 57.

PETI TION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-5237 September Term, 2022

1:21-cv-02968-CJN

Filed On: December 13, 2022

Larry Eugene Clark,

Appellant

v.

Merrick B. Garland, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Katsas and Walker, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit

Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s September 1, 2022, order

be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the case because appellant failed to

establish his standing to sue. See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 573-74

(1992) (“[A] plaintiff raising only a generally available grievance about government —

claiming only harm to his and every citizen’s interest in proper application of the

Constitution and laws, and seeking relief that no more directly and tangibly benefits him

than it does the public at large — does not state an Article III case or controversy.”). 

Appellant’s allegations about manipulated votes do not constitute a particularized injury. 

See Lance v. Coffman, 549 U.S. 437, 442 (2007) (per curiam).
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-5237 September Term, 2022

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Albert *Z.*Standik, Relator, against Harry T. Ashworth, as Warden of the Penitentiary of the City of New York, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County,

January 28, 1943.

John E. MoG-eehan, J.

The writ is dismissed and the relator is remanded. Notwithstanding the remarks of the sentencing court at the time sentence was imposed, this court cannot adjudicate that the sentencing court legally found the defendant beyond the realm of reformation contemplated by the Parole Commission Law (Correction Law, art. 7-A). An appellate court reviewing the matter of the sentence upon a direct appeal might arrive at a different conclusion but this court upon this *445application, cannot act in the capacity of an appellate court as to the sentence imposed and accordingly finds itself bound by the rule of law that the sentencing court pronouncing the sentence imposed impliedly found the defendant not to be insane or mentally or physically incapable of being substantially benefited by the correctional and reformatory purposes of the sentence imposed by the court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP99-301-007]

Take notice that on October 2, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets proposed to become effective October 1, 2000:

Original Sheet No. 14Q

ANR is filing the attached tariff sheet to reflect the implementation of a negotiated rate agreement with Anadarko Energy Services Company for service under Rate Schedule PTS-3. Anadarko's new agreement will be effective October 1, 2000, and will continue through the life of the reserve underlying such agreement. ANR requests that the Commission grant ANR any waivers of the Commission's regulations which are necessary in order to make this tariff sheet effective as of October 1, 2000, and to the extent necessary, moves pursuant to 18 CFR 154.7(a)(9) for the tariff sheet to go into effect on said date. Additionally, ANR requests all such further relief as is appropriate.

ANR states that a copy of this filing is being mailed to the affected shipper and to each of ANR's FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1 and Original Volume No. 2 customers, and interested State Commissions.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26125  Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5377 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5377

    To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,5-dimethyl-2, 5 hexanediol 
                         (dimethylhexanediol).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Fitzpatrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,5-dimethyl-2, 5 hexanediol 
                         (dimethylhexanediol).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,5-DIMETHYL-2, 5 HEXANEDIOL (DIMETHYLHEXANEDIOL).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        2,5-dimethyl-2, 5   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          hexanediol                                                        12/31/2015
                          (dimethylhexanedi
                          ol) (CAS No. 110-
                          03-2) (provided
                          for in subheading
                          2905.39.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 198 (Thursday, October 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Southwestern Region, Arizona, New Mexico, West Texas and 
Oklahoma; Proposed 115KV Transmission Line Project on the Tres Piedras 
Ranger District, Carson National Forest, Taos County, NM

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Based on a request made by the Kit Carson Electric 
Cooperative, the Carson National Forest is preparing an environmental 
impact statement (EIS) to analyze the effects of a proposal to 
authorize Kit Carson Cooperative to construct, operate and maintain a 
new 115 KV electric transmission line and fiber optic system on 
National Forest Lands from the existing Ojo to Taos 115 KV line to Ojo 
Caliente, New Mexico. The proposal also includes construction, 
operation and maintenance of a substation in Ojo Caliente.
    The proposal has several parts, most of which pertain directly to 
National Forest lands and for which the USDA Forest Service will make 
the decision. Other portions pertain to Bureau of Land Management 
administered lands including the proposed substation location, for 
which the responsible line officer in the Bureau of Land Management 
will be the deciding official. If any alternative should be selected 
that might include private holdings, Kit Carson Electric Cooperative 
will negotiate for approval. The purpose of the project is to improve 
existing service by reducing voltage fluctuations and the number of 
outages. It is also to provide fiber optic capabilities to a number of 
small communities in the area.

DATES: The proposed action is currently available for review and 
comment. It is estimated that the draft environmental impact statement 
(DEIS) will be completed and distributed for comments by the end of 
January, 2000. A 45 day comment period will follow. The final 
environmental impact statement and a record of decision is estimated to 
be released by the end of July 2001.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed action and DEIS will be available 
upon request from the Carson Forest Supervisor's Office, 208 Cruz Alta 
Road, Taos, NM 87571, Attn: Power Line Analysis Team. Comments related 
to the DEIS can be sent to the same address.
    Responsible Official: The Forest Supervisor, Carson National 
Forest, is the responsible official and will decide whether or not the 
project will be implemented on Forest Service lands. If so, the Forest 
Supervisor will decide where, how and when they will be implemented.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Power Line Team Leader, Carson Forest 
Supervisor's Office, (505) 758-6200.

40 CFR 1501.7

    Dated: September 27, 2000.
Gilbert Vigil,
Forest Supervisor, Carson National Forest.
[FR Doc. 00-26097 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-U
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5659 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Ethanone, 2,2-dimethoxy-1,2- 

diphenyl-. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Ethanone, 2,2- 

dimethoxy-1,2-diphenyl-. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHANONE, 2,2-DIMETHOXY-1,2-DIPHENYL-. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Ethanone, 2,2-dimethoxy1,2-diphenyl- (CAS No. 

24650–42–8) (provided for 

in subheading 2914.50.30) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5659 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 10076 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DUSTIN PULIDO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4 :1 2

- CR

- 249

- 4

Before JOLLY , HIGGINBOTHAM , and OWEN , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Dustin Pulido raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Hernandez , 633 F.3d 370, 374 (5th Cir. 2011 ), which held that a sentence within the statutory maximum that is based upon judge

- fo und facts does not violate the Sixth
Amendment. Accordingly, the unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 4, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-10076 Document: 00512825384 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated September 8, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2098 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-259114) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in
the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


September 8, 2021