alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Movie Star, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated: February 13, 2006              /s/ Melvyn Knigin
                                      -------------------------------
                                      Melvyn Knigin
                                      Chief Executive Officer

Dated:   February 13, 2006

                                      /s/ Thomas Rende
                                      -------------------------------
                                      Thomas Rende
                                      Chief Financial Officer and
                                      Principal Accounting Officer
```
Exhibit 99.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Standard Register Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis L. Rediker, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 7, 2003





/S/ DENNIS L. REDIKER

Dennis L. Rediker

President and Chief Executive Officer







Exhibit 99.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Standard Register Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig J. Brown, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(3)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(4)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 7, 2003





/S/ CRAIG J. BROWN

Craig J. Brown

Senior Vice President, Treasurer and

Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26323]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems 
(1190).
    Date and Time: October 30, 2000; 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 310, 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. M. C. Roco, Program Director, Division of 
Chemical and Transport Systems (CTS), Room 525, (703) 292-8370.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations for the FY 2000 
Career Panel of proposals as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.


    Dated: October 10, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-26323 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2632 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2632

To amend section 399Z-1 of the Public Health Service Act to extend for 
  5 years the authorization of appropriations for operational grants 
             under the school-based health centers program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2013

   Mrs. Capps (for herself, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Rangel, Ms. Lee of 
California, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Sarbanes, Ms. Brownley 
  of California, Mr. Farr, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Levin, Ms. DeLauro, Ms. 
    Schakowsky, Mr. Polis, Mr. Honda, and Ms. Esty) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 399Z-1 of the Public Health Service Act to extend for 
  5 years the authorization of appropriations for operational grants 
             under the school-based health centers program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``School-based Health Centers Program 
Reauthorization Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. 5-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR 
              OPERATIONAL GRANTS UNDER THE SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH CENTERS 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 399Z-1(l) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280h-
4(l)) is amended by striking ``through 2014'' and inserting ``through 
2019''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kirill Poliakov, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered September 11, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of manslaughter in the second degree, one count of reckless endangerment in the first degree, and two counts of leaving the scene of an accident without reporting, and sentencing defendant to concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 5 to 15 years (two counts), *2Ys*to 7 years, and 1 *Ys*to 4 years (two counts), respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s criminal liability for the motor vehicle accident that caused the death of two pedestrians was established *116beyond a reasonable doubt. Defendant’s conduct constituted a "gross deviation” from the standards that a reasonable person would have followed in the circumstances presented (Penal Law § 15.05 [3]; § 125.15 [1]). The evidence at trial showed that defendant, at night on a wet roadway, drove at an excessive speed, changing lanes rapidly. Though warned by an angry taxi driver that his misconduct could lead to a fatal accident, defendant "peeled away” from a red light. Defendant’s flight from the accident, the wrong way on a one-way street, was further evidence that defendant’s conduct was reckless, and not merely the result of carelessness, lack of skill or foresight.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony. Although the witness was told that another witness had selected either someone else or the wrong person from a photographic array, more than 3 Vi months elapsed between that occurrence and the lineup. *(People v Rodriguez,*64 NY2d 738, 740-741.)

Further, testimony by police officers that the witness had given a detailed description was properly admitted at trial. The details of the witness’s description were probative in their own right *(People v Huertas,*75 NY2d 487), and were admissible to rebut defendant’s claim at trial that the identification testimony was fabricated. *(Cf., People v McClean,*69 NY2d 426).

The introduction of evidence of the victims’ background was harmless error. *(Cf., People v Miller,*6 NY2d 152.) We also find no merit to defendant’s claim that the prosecutor’s summation deprived defendant of a fair trial or that the court abused its discretion in sentencing. We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them lacking in merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.
Inventory Expert Service 

A divisior of the American Chemical Society Phone:800-631-1884,614-447-3870 

Fax: 614-447-3747 

E-mail: answers@cas.org 

Web: www.cas.org/products/client/ 

INVENTORY.EXPERT SERVICE REPORT 

IES-ORDER NUMBER: 135516-1 

REGISTRY NUMBER: 

CAS 

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN, 

0 If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to 

your IES order; Please make the same correction(s) to your PMN before 

submitting it to the EPA. 

2540 Olentangy River Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus, Ohio 43210-0334 USA
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Frederick’s of Hollywood Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 29, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  March 15, 2011
/s/ Thomas J. LynchThomas J. LynchChief Executive Officer andPrincipal Executive OfficerDate:  March 15, 2011
/s/ Thomas RendeThomas RendeChief Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              23
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     19,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,487
<PP&E>                                       2,770,460
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,548,694
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,662,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,654
<BONDS>                                        500,234
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                     806,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,662,829
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               291,255
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,831
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             57,440
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,440
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7189

DENNIS BAYSDEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA; MACK

JARVIS,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-574-3)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Baysden, Appellant Pro Se. Kendrick C. Fentress, Assistant

Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Baysden seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting a magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Respondents’

motion for summary judgment and deny relief on Baysden’s petition

filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and a

subsequent order denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error in the court’s orders. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Baysden v. Attorney General of

North Carolina, No. CA-97-574-3 (M.D.N.C. July 1, 1998; Dec. 10,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5702 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5702

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Diiodomethyl-p-
                             tolylsulfone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

 Mr. Paulsen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Diiodomethyl-p-
                             tolylsulfone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIIODOMETHYL-P-TOLYLSUFONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.90 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Diiodomethyl-p-tolylsulfone) 
is amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5703 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Propenoic acid, polymer 

with diethenylbenzene. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. PAULSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Propenoic 

acid, polymer with diethenylbenzene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-PROPENOIC ACID, POLYMER WITH 

4 DIETHENYLBENZENE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.95 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 2-Propenoic acid, polymer with diethenylbenzene) is 

8 amended by striking the date in the effective period col9 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5703 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### HILTON v. STATE.

No. 24974.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 15, 1950.

Rehearing *Denied Jan.*17, 1951.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s A tty., of Austin, for the state.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant was found guilty of the offense of assault with intent to murder with malice, under a count of the indictment charging such an assault by shooting a gun into a private residence. The jury assessed the punishment at 10 years in the penitentiary.

The injured party, Myrtle Payne, and appellant, though not married, had been living together. They separated, and Myrtle Payne went to live with her sister in an upstairs apartment.

Appellant came to the apartment at night, armed with a shotgun, which he testified he had for the purpose of threatening suicide if Myrtle refused to return to him. Myrtle was sleeping on a pallet. Lonnie Bess, the owner of the apartment, went to the door and told appellant that Myrtle did not care to see him. Appellant fired through the screen door, the shot striking Myrtle Payne in the region of the lower back and buttocks, as she lay on the pallet. Some of the shot were removed at the hospital and others were not removed because of their depth in the body.

Appellant testified that he fired into the floor, without any intent to hit anyone, and that he did not see Myrtle and did not know that she was on the pallet on the floor.

Bess testified that appellant asked him if that was Myrtle lying on the pallet, and immediately fired when told that it was.

The court properly submitted the issues thus raised and the jury by their verdict decided against appellant’s contention.

By his Bill of Exception No. 1, appellant complains that the court refused to submit the law of self-defense in his charge. The trial court in his qualification to this bill expresses the opinion that such issue was not raised by the evidence. We are in accord with the trial court’s view, and find no error shown by this bill.

The remaining hill of exception complains of the argument of the dis*179trict attorney wherein he said “within six months after he comes out of the penitentiary he commits this offense.” This bill is insufficient to show reversible error.

It is not shown that the argument complained of was not provoked or invited by the argument of appellant’s counsel. See Trammell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 232 S.W.2d 719.

Also appellant’s objection was sustained by the court, the remark withdrawn by the district attorney, and the court instructed the jury that the evidence as to prior conviction was admitted solely on the question of the credibility of the witness.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT A

Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-6 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 2
Materials and Other Information Considered

• Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Construction Brief (6:20-cv-00544) and associated exhibits

• U.S. Pat. No. 8,429,480 (’480 Patent)

• Prosecution History of the ’480 Patent 

• Prosecution History of the EP2201717 (EP counterpart patent of the ’480 Patent)

• Plaintiff’s Preliminary Constructions (6:20-cv-00544)

• Huawei’s Preliminary Constructions (6:20-cv-00544)

• 3GPP TS 36.300 v8.1.0 (2007-06), “Technical Specification Group Radio Access 

Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) and Evolved Universal 

Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); Overall Description Stage 2 (Release 8)

• 3GPP TS 36.321 v8.2.0 (2008-05), “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical 

Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access 

(E-UTRA) and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Access Network (E-UTRAN); Medium 

Access Control (MAC) protocol specification (Release 8)

• 3GPP TS 36.213 v8.3.0 (2008-05), “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical 

Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access 

(E-UTRA) and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Access Network (E-UTRAN); Physical 

layer procedures (Release 8)

• 3GPP meeting document, R2-070476, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #57, 12-16 Feb. 

2007, St. Louis, Miss., USA, “Uplink Scheduling for VoIP

Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-6 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0093

IN THE MATTER OF:

M.J.W.,

A Youth In Need of Care.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Nancy Skurvid is 

granted an extension of time to and including May 6, 2021, within 

which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 2 2021

04/02/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0093
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00984-CV

Tiffany Thomas 

v.

T. Jayakumar, First Street Hospital, and First Surgical Partners, LLC

NO. 2014-22071 IN THE 334TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

SUPP CLK RECORD

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

STATEWIDE EFILING

FILING

MT FEE

$34.00

$10.00

$189.00

$20.00

$175.00

$10.00

03/05/2015

01/30/2015

01/20/2015

01/08/2015

01/08/2015

12/17/2014

PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

E-PAID

UNK

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$438.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 
First District of Texas, this April 22, 2016.