alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Lend Lease

Asset Management, L.P.

 

Management Assertion

 

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, Lend Lease Asset Management L.P. (the Partnership) complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers set forth in Appendix A, to the extent such standards were applicable to the special servicing performed by the Partnership. A list of portfolios covered by this assertion is included in Appendix B. As of and for this same period, the Partnership had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $25,000,000.

 

 

/s/ David Altshuler			                 	 /s/ Elaine K. Miller			 
David Altshuler						Elaine K. Miller

Principal, Accounting					Principal, Asset Management

 

 

February 3, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
"This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and Income Statement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements."
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,168,032
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,507,710
<ALLOWANCES>                                   390,213
<INVENTORY>                                  5,088,855
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,804,449
<PP&E>                                       1,779,045
<DEPRECIATION>                                 976,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,875,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,323,943
<BONDS>                                        311,668
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       547,840
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,692,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,875,683
<SALES>                                      9,029,994
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,087,620
<CGS>                                        7,159,234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,891,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             297,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,498,944)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,498,944)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,498,944)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132458 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132458 

 COA: 261095 

Oakland CC: 2003-193756-FC;

KEITH FITZGERALD PERRY, 2003-193757-FC; 2003-193758-FC 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0122 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 29, 2007 

 Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

AND EMC CORPORATION,

 Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00473-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00474-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00475-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00476-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00477-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00478-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00479-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00482-ADA

PATENT CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, AND VMWARE, 

INC.,

 Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00480-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00481-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00485-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00486-ADA

PATENT CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING OPPOSED MOTION FOR DENIAL OF PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST 

FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ENTRY OF ACQUISITION BAR

The Court, having considered Defendants’ Opposed Motion for Denial of Plaintiff’s 

Request for Reconsideration of Entry of Acquisition Bar, hereby ORDERS that the motion is 

GRANTED and that Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration of the acquisition bar decided by the 

Court is DENIED.

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 129-6 Filed 12/15/21 Page 1 of 2
2

SIGNED this _________ day of _________________ 202__.

___________________________________

HONORABLE ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 129-6 Filed 12/15/21 Page 2 of 2
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Anthony Sorel Haywood v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00994

- CR

Trial court case number: 1373686

Trial court: 176th District Court of Harris Co unty

On March 28, 2014, appellant Anthony Sorel Haywood filed a motion for extension of

library time. The motion is DENIED

. Appellant is not entitled to “hybrid representation,”

which is defined as representation partly by counsel, partly by self. See, e.g., Robinson v. State

, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). Pro se motions filed by a criminal defendant

already represented by counsel may be disregarded. Id.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

X Ac ting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 8, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5392 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5392

     To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Solvent Yellow 195.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Ms. Fudge introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Solvent Yellow 195.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOLVENT YELLOW 195.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Solvent Yellow 195  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 440645-                                                  12/31/2015
                          24-9) (provided
                          for in subheading
                          3204.19.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:20-cv-00132-DB Document 2 Filed 05/21/20 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-00132-DB Document 2 Filed 05/21/20 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-00132-DB Document 2 Filed 05/21/20 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-00132-DB Document 2 Filed 05/21/20 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-00132-DB Document 2 Filed 05/21/20 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-00132-DB Document 2 Filed 05/21/20 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-00132-DB Document 2 Filed 05/21/20 Page 7 of 7
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 76698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30162]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8559]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Somalia

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), as carried forward by the Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Div. F, Pub. L. 113-6), and Department of 
State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it 
is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the 
requirements of Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act and similar provisions of 
law in prior year Acts with respect to Somalia and I hereby waive this 
restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 10, 2013.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-30162 Filed 12-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Hooks, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James Leff, J.), rendered May 17, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from *3Vz*to 7 years and one year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s right to a fair trial was not violated by the trial court’s ruling that defendant’s sole prior conviction was suppressed unless if, in testifying, he drew on his "long history of good works”. Defendant testified that he had managed his grandmother’s country store and tended to her 102 acres of land when she was ill. At the conclusion of defendant’s direct testimony the court further ruled that in light of defendant’s testimony about his sick grandmother the prosecutor could cross-examine him about an unexplained "time span” in defendant’s recital of his prior employment. The question ultimately asked revealed that the defendant had been incarcerated during that period after his conviction. We believe that the court’s order allowing the inquiry was an appropriate response to defendant’s violation of the court’s injunction against "gilding the lily”, and we find no ambiguity in the initial order concerning the permissible scope of his testimony. While we believe that the prosecutor’s summation unfairly *272exploited this area of inquiry, we note that defendant failed to make a timely objection. Given the overwhelming proof of guilt, we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction with respect to this point. In any event, the court, in its charge, emphasized that the prior conviction could be considered only in determining defendant’s credibility.

Although defendant was entitled to a charge that the statutory presumptions were permissive, not mandatory *(see, People v McKenzie,*67 NY2d 695), the issue is unpreserved. Moreover, since the charge did not contain any express burden-shifting language, we are not compelled to reach the issue as a matter of law. *(See, People v Thomas,*50 NY2d 467.)

We have examined defendant’s other claim and note that it is also unpreserved. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Milonas, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5612 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain plastic fittings of 

perfluoroalkoxy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. ELLISON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

plastic fittings of perfluoroalkoxy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASTIC FITTINGS OF 

4 PERFLUOROALKOXY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.78 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 plastic fittings composed of perfluoroalkoxy) is amended 

8 by striking the date in the effective period column and 

9 inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5612 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Richard Fisher, certify that: 

1.
 I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Cytation Corporation; 

2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.
The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 
a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) [Omitted];

c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.
The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. 

 
 
 
 
By:  
/s/ Richard Fisher
 
Chairman
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26250]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 91F-0170]


W.R. Grace & Co.; Withdrawal of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a food additive 
petition (FAP 1B4257) proposing that the food additive regulations be 
amended to provide for the safe use of styrene-n-butyl acrylate-acrylic 
acid terpolymer, 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, and sulfosuccinic acid 4-
ester with polyethylene glycol dodecyl ether, disodium salt as 
components in can end cements in contact with food.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Zajac, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3095.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal 
Register of July 16, 1991 (56 FR 32435), FDA announced that a food 
additive petition (FAP 1B4257) had been filed by W.R. Grace, Ltd., 
Cromwell Rd., St. Neots, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire PE 19 1QL, England 
(now W.R. Grace & Co., Darex Container Products, 62 Whittemore Ave., 
Cambridge, MA 02140). The petition proposed to amend the food additive 
regulations in Sec. 175.300 Resinous and polymeric coatings (21 CFR 
175.300) to provide for the safe use of styrene-n-butyl acrylate-
acrylic acid terpolymer, 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, and sulfosuccinic 
acid 4-ester with polyethylene glycol dodecyl ether, disodium salt as 
components in can end cements in contact with food. W.R. Grace & Co. 
has now withdrawn the petition without prejudice to a future filing (21 
CFR 171.7).

    Dated: September 26, 2000.
Alan M. Rulis,
Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 00-26250 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135076 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135076 COA: 279195 Monroe CC: 05-034472-FH LAWRENCE DAVI D FUQUA, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 22, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

l1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2008

Clerk
EXHIBIT 3

Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 85-4 Filed 03/17/21 Page 1 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 85-4 Filed 03/17/21 Page 2 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 85-4 Filed 03/17/21 Page 3 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 85-4 Filed 03/17/21 Page 4 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 85-4 Filed 03/17/21 Page 5 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 85-4 Filed 03/17/21 Page 6 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 85-4 Filed 03/17/21 Page 7 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 85-4 Filed 03/17/21 Page 8 of 8
The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court 1

for the Western District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3326

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Gerardo Garcia Hernandez, also *

known as Gerardo Garcia, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: January 7, 1999

 Filed: January 20, 1999

___________

Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD 

ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Gerardo Garcia Hernandez (Mr. Garcia) pleaded guilty to distribution of

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced 1

Mr. Garcia to 70 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Mr. Garcia

appeals, and we affirm.
-2-

For reversal, Mr. Garcia argues the district court erred in denying him a minimal

or minor role reduction under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.2 (1998). At

sentencing, a government witness testified that he observed Mr. Garcia enter a

laundromat after a brief conversation with a confidential informant (CI) in the CI&s

vehicle, and then return to the CI&s vehicle with a package containing 232 grams of

actual methamphetamine. Additionally, Mr. Garcia testified that he contacted a

supplier after agreeing to provide drugs for the CI, and that he expected to be

compensated for his role in the transaction. 

Based on this testimony, we conclude the district court did not clearly err in

concluding Mr. Garcia was neither a minor nor a minimal participant. Mr. Garcia does

not dispute that he arranged the transaction, that he accompanied the source to the

transaction, that he delivered the drugs to the CI, and that he expected to receive

compensation. See United States v. Chatman, 119 F.3d 1335, 1341 (8th Cir.), cert.

denied, 118 S. Ct. 434 (1997); United States v. Harris, 974 F.2d 84, 86 (8th Cir. 1992).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
From: Anderson, Wes Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:42:24 PM To: Edwards, Brenda Cc: Res_Central_AC_HP Subject: Note to File on DOE meeting with HARDI Auto forwarded by a Rule

Brenda,

Please put a note in the docket stating the below information.

Thanks,

WES

Wes Anderson

Mechanical Engineer

Building Technologies Program

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

U. S. Department of Energy

202-586-7335

Note to file:

The Department of Energy met with a few members of Heating, Air conditioning & Refrigeration Distributors International (HARDI, an industry trade organization dedicated to advancing the science of wholesale distribution in the HVAC-R industry) via conference call to gather information about the residential central air conditioner and heat pump distribution channel on December 18, 2008 from 2:00 PM – 4:00 PM (EST). The discussion centered on DOE developing an understanding of the current structure of wholesale distribution network and its economics in the United States.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 

Defendant.

CASE NO. 6:20-CV-00459-ADA

Jury Trial Demanded

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF CASE WITH PREJUDICE

This Court, having considered the parties’ Joint Stipulated Dismissal of Case with 

Prejudice, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS the following: 

Case No. 6:20-CV-00459 is dismissed with prejudice.

The parties’ claims for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses, if any, shall be preserved until 

resolution of the remaining cases (Case Nos. 6:20-CV-454, -456, -457, -458, -460, -461, -462, -

463, -464, and -465). 

SIGNED this 21st day of December, 2021. 

____________________________________ 

HONORABLE ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00459-ADA Document 90 Filed 12/21/21 Page 1 of 1