Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 198 / Thursday, October 12, 2000 / Notices 60615

shipments of certain circular welded

carbon steel pipes and tubes from

Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from the

warehouse, for consumption on or after

the publication date of the final results

of these administrative reviews, as

provided by section 751(a)(1) of the

Tariff Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for

Yieh Hsing will be zero, in light of its

de minimis weighted-average margin;

(2) for previously reviewed or

investigated companies not listed above,

the cash deposit rate will continue to be

the company-specific rate published for

the most recent period; (3) if the

exporter is not a firm covered in this

review, a prior review, or the original

less-than-fair-value (LTFV)

investigation, but the manufacturer is,

the cash deposit rate will be the rate

established for the most recent period

for the manufacturer of the

merchandise; and (4) if neither the

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm

covered in this review, the cash deposit

rate will be 9.70 percent. This rate is the

‘‘all others’’ rate from the amended final

determination in the LTFV

investigation.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to importers of their responsibility

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a

certificate regarding the reimbursement

of antidumping duties prior to

liquidation of the relevant entries

during these review periods. Failure to

comply with this requirement could

result in the Secretary’s presumption

that reimbursement of antidumping

duties occurred and the subsequent

assessment of double antidumping

duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective orders (APOs) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with sections 351.305 and 351.306 of

the Department’s regulations. Timely

written notification of the return/

destruction of APO materials or

conversion to judicial protective order is

hereby requested. Failure to comply

with the regulations and terms of an

APO is a violation which is subject to

sanction.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with section 751(a)(1)

of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1))

and 19 CFR 351.221.

Dated: October 5, 2000.

Troy H. Cribb,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–26243 Filed 10–11–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–588–838]

Clad Steel Plate From Japan:

Rescission of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of rescission of

antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: In response to notification by

Dana Glacier Daido America LLC that it

is not an interested party in this

proceeding, we are rescinding the 1999–

2000 administrative review of clad steel

plate from Japan.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 12, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James Nunno or Christopher Priddy,

AD/CVD Enforcement Group I, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;

telephone (202) 482–0783 or (202) 482–

1130, respectively.

Applicable Statute and Regulations

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the Act are references to the

provisions effective January 1, 1995, the

effective date of the amendments made

to the Act by the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act (URAA). In addition,

unless otherwise indicated, all citations

to the Department’s regulations are to 19

CFR part 351 (1999).

Background

On July 31, 2000, Dana Glacier Daido

America LLC (Dana), requested that the

Department conduct an administrative

review of the antidumping duty order

on stainless steel sheet and strip in coils

from Japan for subject merchandise

produced and exported by Daido Metal

Corp. (Daido) during the period January

4, 1999, through June 30, 2000. On

August 3, 2000, and August 9, 2000,

Dana revised this request to correct and

clarify the case name and number for

which it requested an administrative

review (i.e., Dana intended to request a

review of clad steel plate from Japan

produced and/or exported by Daido to

the United States). On August 31, 2000,

Dana informed the Department that the

merchandise that it imported is not

subject to the antidumping duty order

on clad steel plate from Japan, and

withdrew its request for an

administrative review. On September 6,

2000, the Department published in the

Federal Register a notice of initiation of

administrative review with respect to

Daido. See Initiation of Antidumping

and Countervailing Duty Administrative

Reviews and Request for Revocation in

Part; 65 FR 53980 (Sept. 6, 2000).

Rescission of Review

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(b)(3), the

Department will initiate an

administrative review based on a

request from an importer of the subject

merchandise. Given that Dana withdrew

its request for review, notified the

Department that it was not an importer

of the subject merchandise during the

period of review, and that no other party

requested a review of this order, we are

rescinding this review.

This rescission of the administrative

review and notice are in accordance

with section 751 of the Act and 19 CFR

351.213(d).

Dated: October 2, 2000.

Richard W. Moreland,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–26242 Filed 10–11–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–583–824]

Polyvinyl Alcohol From Taiwan: Final

Results of Third Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review and

Determination Not To Revoke Order in

Part

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of final results of third

antidumping duty administrative review

and determination not to revoke order

in part.

SUMMARY: On June 6, 2000, the

Department of Commerce published the

preliminary results in the third

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on polyvinyl

alcohol from Taiwan and intent not to

revoke the order in part. The review

covers Chang Chun Petrochemical Co.,

Ltd., a manufacturer/exporter of the

subject merchandise. The period of

review is May 1, 1998, through April 30,

1999.

Based on our analysis of the

comments received, we have made one

change in the margin calculations to

correct a ministerial error. However, the

final results do not differ from the

preliminary results as a result of that

change. The final weighted-average