alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5681 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5681

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Reactive Yellow 7459.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Reactive Yellow 7459.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REACTIVE YELLOW 7459.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.46 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Reactive Yellow 7459) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Texas--RRC District 7B Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Texas--RRC District 7B Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 119   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 273    | 385    | 17     | 331    | 193    | 11     | 112    | 283    | 19     | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 109    | 309    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                        
|                                                                                                     
|Pennsylvania Nonassociated Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                     
|Pennsylvania Nonassociated Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 57     | 24     | 222    | 190   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 174    | 305    | 400    | 274    | 410    | 420    | 603    | 709    | 686    | 2,282 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5,472  | 13,067 | 17,236 | 21,500 | 24,087 | 17,143 | 18,431 | 25,136 | 36,435 | 41,577
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 27,478 | 37,198 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
QUENTIN B. ALLEN,

Appellant,

v.

CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3322

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Kevin J. Carroll, Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

Elizabeth T. Frau of Ronald R. Wolfe & Assoc., P.L., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., THOMAS, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26089]



[[Page 60493]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice Number 3412]


Notice of Meetings: United States International Telecommunication 
Advisory Committee (ITAC)--Telecommunication Standardization Sector 
(ITAC-T), National Committee & U.S. Study Groups A & D

    The Department of State announces meetings of the U.S. 
International Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC)--
Telecommunication Standardization (ITAC-T) National Committee and US 
Study Groups A and D. The purpose of the Committees is to advise the 
Department on policy and technical issues with respect to the 
International Telecommunication Union and international 
telecommunication standardization and development. Except where noted, 
meetings will be held at the Department of State, 2201 ``C'' Street, 
NW, Washington, DC.
    The ITAC-T National Committee will meet from 9:30 to noon on 
October 18, 2000, at the Department of State to review the results of 
the ITU-T World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA) and 
organize the national study program to support those results.
    The ITAC-T U.S. Study Group A will meet from 2:00 to 4:00 on 
November 14, 2000, at the Federal Communications Commission to prepare 
positions for the ITU-T Study Group 3 meeting starting in December.
    The ITAC-T U.S. Study Group D will meet from 9 a.m. to noon on 
October 19, 2000, at the Department of State to prepare positions for 
the next ITU-T Study Groups 8 and 16 and Study Group 9 Working Party 1.
    Members of the general public may attend these meetings. Directions 
to meeting locations and actual room assignments may be determined by 
calling the Secretariat at 202 647-0965/2592. Entrance to the 
Department of State is controlled; people intending to attend any of 
the ITAC meetings should send a fax to (202) 647-7407 not later than 24 
hours before the meeting. This fax should display the name of the 
meeting (ITAC-T, U. S. Study Group A or D) and date of meeting, your 
name, social security number, date of birth, and organizational 
affiliation. One of the following valid photo identifications will be 
required for admission: U.S. driver's license, passport, U.S. 
Government identification card. Enter the Department of State from the 
C Street Lobby; in view of escorting requirements, non-Government 
attendees should plan to arrive not less than 15 minutes before the 
meeting begins.
    Attendees may join in the discussions, subject to the instructions 
of the Chair. Admission of members will be limited to seating 
available.

    Dated: October 2, 2000.
John R. Gilsenan,
Chairman, ITAC-R, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-26089 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-P
**Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Richard Fisher, certify that: 

1.
 I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Cytation Corporation.; 

2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.
The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 
a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) [Omitted];

c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.
The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. 

 
 
 
 
By:  
/s/ Richard Fisher
 
Chairman
Order entered May 15, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00378

- CV

METHODIST RICHARDSON MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant

V.

TINA CELLARS, Appellee

On Appeal from th e 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 09173



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellee’s May 13, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file a

brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to May 28, 2019

.

/s/ KEN MO LBERG

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 12





                           SONAT INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


                        Computation of Ratios of Earnings
                   from Continuing Operations to Fixed Charges
                              Total Enterprise (a)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                        Three Months Ended March 31,                        Years Ended December 31,


                                             1997           1996            1996       1995         1994        1993        1992
                                             ----          ----             ----       ----         ----        ----        ----

                                                                                               (In Thousands)

Earnings from Continuing Operations:
<S>                                        <C>           <C>             <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>     
   Income (loss) before income taxes       $100,205      $ 66,183        $294,304    $282,497     $154,871    $364,198     $133,728
Fixed charges (see computation below)        36,578        39,746         152,830     165,154      127,909     129,160      156,428
   Less allowance for interest capitalized   (1,126)       (1,359)         (5,094)     (6,540)      (6,692)     (4,101)      (8,422)
                                           --------      --------        --------    --------     --------    --------     --------
Total Earnings Available for Fixed Charges $135,657      $104,570        $442,040    $441,111     $276,088    $489,257     $281,734
                                           ========      ========        ========    ========     ========    ========     ========


Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense before deducting
      interest capitalized                 $ 34,630      $ 37,854        $145,406    $157,653     $120,295    $122,204     $149,165
   Rentals(b)                                 1,948         1,892           7,424       7,501        7,614       6,956        7,263
                                           --------      --------        --------    --------     --------    --------     --------
                                           $ 36,578      $ 39,746        $152,830    $165,154     $127,909    $129,160     $156,428
                                           ========      ========        ========    ========     ========    ========     ========


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges              3.7           2.6             2.9         2.7          2.2         3.8          1.8
                                           ========      ========        ========    ========     ========    ========     ========
</TABLE>


----------------

(a)  Amounts  include the  Company's  portion of the  captions as they relate to
     persons accounted for by the equity method.

(b)  These  amounts  represent  1/3 of rentals  which  approximate  the interest
     factor  applicable to such rentals of the Company and its  subsidiaries and
     continuing unconsolidated affiliates.
No. 06-1 4-00201--CR

IN The Sixth Court of Appeals

Texarkana, Texas

MARK VICTOR DHEIL,

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Atr:.F'eJ'J'ant,

Ag>p'eJ.Jee.

MOTION TO WITHDRAW PURSUANT TO

ANDERS V. CALTFORNTA, 38 6 U. S . 738 (1'961 )

TO THE HONC)RABLE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS:

NOW COMES JEFF T. JACKSON, counsel for /tppellant Mark

Victor Dh.eil, and hereby moves to withdraw f rom

representat-ion of Appellant pursuant Lo Anders v.

Cafifornia, 386 u.s. 738 (1961). In support of this

motion, counsel shows as follows:

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 1/27/2015 4:34:52 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
I.

counse-L h;rs thoroughly reviewed the reco::d on appeal,

and, f or t.hese reasons, is thoroughly f amil-iar with the

Counse.I Ltas, in the exercj-se of his prof essionalr rrdr^rmant_ - cletermined that the instant case preSents no

J uvYrrrvrr e /

nonfrivolouS issues for appeal, and, in accordlance with the

Supreme Court's decision in Anders v. CaLifornia, 386 U'S'

738 ftg67), now so advise the court and reques;ts permission

to withdraw. .Anders, id. at 1 44 -

In accordance

III.

with Anders, counsel 1^^ lId.D ^

7

contemporarLeously with this motion, filed a b::ief outlining

alt issues which might arguably support an appeal and

explaining why those issues are meritless. An<Cers, Id.

IV.

counsel has furnished Appellant with a copy of said

brief, and a (topy of this motion, thus appri:;ing Appellant

of counsel/'s actions. counsel has also furnished Appellant

wit.h the reco::d on appeal and inst.ructions orlL f iling a Pro

Se Appellant' s Bri-ef "
V.

Having determined that the instant appeal is who1ly

frivolous, and having complied with the briefing and notice

requirements of Anders v. Cafifornia, counsel- now requests

t.hat. he be allowed t.o withdraw, pursuant to Anc{ers.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, it is priayed t'hat. the

court grant. counsel's request. and allow couosol to withdraw

from this case, pursuant to Anders v. Cal-ifornia,386 U'S'

738 (1961) .

SBOT No. 24069916

735-A Hwy 259 N.

Kilgore, TX 15662

Phone: 903-65 4-3362

Fax: B1-1-887-4:333

Attorney for APPeT-Lant,

Mark Victor Dh.eiL

Respectful ly submit.ted,

Jackson
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to Tnx. R. App. P. 9.5, I certify that on

January 26, 2OL5 | a copy of t.his mot.ion was mailed via

first cl-ass U.S. mail, postaqe prepaid, to the following:

Micheal Jlmerson:

Rusk C()unt.y District AttorneY

SBOT: 00189406

1-15 N. Main St.

Henderson, TX '7 5652

Mark Victor Dheil

TDCJ No. 019651 61

SID No. 0634 4918

Choice Moore

Trans; f er Facility

17OO N. FM 81

Bonham, TX 1 54IB

Jeff T. Jackson

Af{-nrnarz Fnr Annol I rnl_ f1L U\JI.tlsy !vr nyll"
#### WOODMAN et al. v. PLOEGER et ux.

No. 11437.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Aug. 9, 1944.

Henry Greenberg, of Galveston, for appellants.

T. A. Graves, of Cuero, for appellees.

MURRAY, Justice.

This suit was instituted by Leslie Frank Ploeger of DeWitt County against Mrs. Stella Ploeger, also of DeWitt County, and ■ Mrs. Mollie Lillian Woodman and her husband, C. C. Woodman, both of Galveston County, seeking to have custody and care of his five-year-old daughter, Lillian Sylvia Ploeger awarded to him.

Mr. and Mrs. Woodman filed a plea of privilege to be sued in the county of their residence, to-wit, Galveston County. A controverting affidavit was filed invoking the provisions of Subdivision 4 of Art. 1995, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats.

The plea of privilege was overruled and the Woodmans have appealed.

Leslie Frank Ploeger and Mollie Lillian Woodman were formerly man and wife. They were divorced in a suit filed in De-Witt County. The custody of their child, Lillian Sylvia Ploeger, has been changed several times. Just prior to the time this suit was instituted there was a judgment in effect in the District Court of DeWitt County which gave the custody of this child to her mother for ten months of the year and to her father or grandmother, Mrs. Stella Ploeger, during the months of January and July of each year. When the child became of school age then the father and grandmother were to have her during the months of July and August.

On January 26, 1944, the trial judge en-' tered an order giving the father custody of the child for the month of February, 1944. The validity of this order was questioned because it was rendered without notice or hearing. However, this matter became moot on March 1, 1944, when the child was returned to its mother in Galveston County. The'present suit was filed February 21, 1944, while the child was visiting with its grandmother in DeWitt County. *266However, the hearing on the plea of privilege was not had until after March 1, 1944, when the child had been returned to her mother in Galveston County.

Appellees alleged that the grandmother was denying the father the custody of his child and depended upon this cause of action to hold venue in DeWitt County, under said Subdivision 4, requiring a resident defendant.

The findings of fact by the trial judge show that if appellees ever had a cause of action against Mrs. Stella Ploeger the same had become moot at the time of the hearing, because at that time the child had been returned to the custody of the mother in Galveston County.

The first step in retaining venue under Subdivision 4 of Art. 1995, supra, is to both allege and prove a cause of action against the resident defendant. Hammonds v. Houston Electric Co., Tex.Civ.App., 169 S.W.2d 765. The findings not only fail to show a cause of action against the resident defendant, but they affirmatively show that appellees did not have a cause of action against such resident defendant.

The order overruling the plea of privilege will be reversed and judgment here rendered transferring venue of this cause to the District Court of Galveston County, Texas.