alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GMAC
Commercial Mortgage
550 California Street, 12th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel. 415 835 9200

Fax 415 391 2949

 

 

 

 

CDC Commercial Mortgage Trust

               Series 2002 FX1

                                              Annual Statement as to Compliance

                                For Period of June 10, 2002 through December 31, 2002

 

 

Pursuant to Section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement I attest that:

A review of the activities of GMAC Commercial Mortgage as Special Servicer during the period, and of its performance under this Agreement, has been made under my supervision.

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, GMAC Commercial Mortgage as Special Servicer, has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under this Agreement throughout the period. However, during the period of June 10, 2002 through December 31, 2002, GMAC Commercial Mortgage as Special Servicer did not service any Specially Serviced Mortgaged Loans.

GMAC Commercial Mortgage as Special Servicer has received no notice regarding qualifications, or challenging the status, of the Trust Fund as a REMIC or of the Grantor Trust as a "grantor trust" under the Grantor Trust Provisions from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or body.

 

GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION
* 

 

 

By: *Michele Heisler                    Date:     2/21/03
      Michele Heisler

      Vice President, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation

 

 

	**
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6122
JAMES DALLAS TOLBERT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE DEEDS, Respondent - Appellee.

No. 97-6774
JAMES DALLAS TOLBERT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE DEEDS, Respondent - Appellee.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-116-R)2 Submitted: August 5, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.James Dallas Tolbert, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Even if we were to construe Tolbert's notice of appeal as a motion for production filed in this Court, we note that the record on appeal transmitted to this court appears to contain all the materials encompassed by Tolbert's request. 3 PER CURIAM:James Dallas Tolbert seeks to appeal, in No. 97-6122, the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Tolbert v. Deeds , No. CA-96-116-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 23, 1996). Turning to Tolbert's appeal in No. 97-6774, we note that this is an appeal from a post-judgment motion for the provision of records and transcripts to aid in preparation of the appeal in No. 97-6122. Because Tolbert appeals directly from the magistrate judge's order, we find that this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. We therefore dismiss this appeal as well. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### GLOVER v. STATE.

No. 26279.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 25, 1953.

Wright Stubbs, Austin, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for the misdemeanor offense of swindling by worthless check, under Art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., with punishment assessed at 45 days in jail. '

As we pointed out in Pallage v. State, Tex.Cr.R., 253 S.W.2d 47, knowledge on the part of the drawer or maker of the check that he did not have sufficient funds on deposit with the bank to pay the check is an essential element of the offense denounced by Sec. 1 of Art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. See, also, Knight v. State, Tex.Cr.R. 254 S.W.2d 113.

The instant information contains no such allegation and therefore does not charge the offense for which appellant has been here convicted.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

NCS MULTISTAGE INC.

 

 Plaintiff,

§

§ 

§ 

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-00277 

vs. §

§

NINE ENERGY SERVICE

 

 Defendant.

§

§ 

§ 

§

NCS MULTISTAGE INC.’S RULE 7.1

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, NCS Multistage Inc. states that: 

1. The following are the parent corporations of Plaintiff NCS Multistage Inc.: 

a. NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc., which is the parent company of Pioneer 

Intermediate, Inc., which is the parent company of Pioneer Investment, Inc., 

which is the parent company of Plaintiff NCS Multistage Inc. 

2. The following are the publicly held corporations owning 10% or more of NCS’ 

stock. 

b. Advent International Corporation 

Dated: April 8, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

 

/s/ Domingo M. LLagostera

BLANK ROME LLP

Domingo M. Llagostera (Attorney-in-charge)

State Bar No. 24070157 

Tel.: (713) 632-8682 

DLLagostera@BlankRome.com 

717 Texas Avenue, Suite 1400 

Houston, TX 77002 

Attorneys for Plaintiff NCS Multistage Inc.

Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 2 Filed 04/08/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Frederick’s of Hollywood Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  June 13, 2011
/s/ Thomas J. LynchThomas J. LynchChief Executive Officer andPrincipal Executive OfficerDate:  June 13, 2011
/s/ Thomas RendeThomas RendeChief Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 15.2



|     |  |                                                                                                            
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | P O Box 621 Krugersdorp 1740
 Tel: +27 (011) 954 2756
Fax: +27 (0) 86 624 6027 Email: asgconsult@mweb.co.za

The Board of Directors of

Randgold Resources Limited (the Company)

March 28, 2013

Re:Consent

Gentlemen:

I, Shaun Gillespie, do hereby consent to the reference of myself in the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2012 (the Annual Report) to which this consent is an exhibit, to any reference to Mr. Shaun Gillespie under the heading Experts in any registration statement into which the Annual Report is
incorporated by reference, and to the citation and/or summarization of the reserve statement in the Annual Report as calculated by me for the Morila open pit mineral reserves, the Loulo and Gounkoto open pit mineral reserves and the Tongon open pit
mineral reserves

Dated this 28thday of March, 2013.

By: /s/ Shaun Gillespie

Name: Shaun
Gillespie

Title:
Consultant
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                             517
<SECURITIES>                                    26,719
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,423
<INVENTORY>                                     72,521
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               141,011
<PP&E>                                         124,227
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,497
<BONDS>                                          5,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,948
<OTHER-SE>                                     168,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,218
<SALES>                                        183,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,712
<CGS>                                          126,518
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 540
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,029
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,971
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,971
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.99
        

</TABLE>
July 14 , 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MICHAEL SHAWN RYALS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00435

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________ ______________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decis ion certified below for observance.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Larrea BioSciences Corporation, formerly
known as Sonic Media Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, David Kalenuik Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: August 25, 2004

/s/ David Kalenuik
------------------
David Kalenuik, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Lou Maki, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Technology Resources, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer=s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer=s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer=s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer=s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer=s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer=s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer=s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting.    Date: February 1, 2008 /s/ Lou Maki Lou Maki Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 12

VON HOFFMANN HOLDINGS INC.        Ratios: Calculation of Earnings to Fixed Charges  (In thousands)

|                                                     |  | Year Ended
December 31,
2001 |         | Year Ended
December 31,
2002 |   | Year Ended
December 31,
2003 |  
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ------- | ---------------------------- | - | ---------------------------- | -
|Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations |  | $                            | (11,512 | )                            | $ | (6,289                       | )
|Interest expense                                     |  |                              | 38,127  |                              |   | 39,086                       |  
|                                                     |  |                              |         |                              |   |                              |  
|Adjusted earnings                                    |  | $                            | 26,615  |                              | $ | 32,797                       |  
|                                                     |  |                              |         |                              |   |                              |  
|Interest expense                                     |  | $                            | 38,127  |                              | $ | 39,086                       |  
|                                                     |  |                              |         |                              |   |                              |  
|Adjusted fixed charges                               |  | $                            | 38,127  |                              | $ | 39,086                       |  
|                                                     |  |                              |         |                              |   |                              |  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   |  |                              | 0.70    |                              |   | 0.84                         |  
|                                                     |  |                              |         |                              |   |                              |  
|Deficiency in earnings                               |  | $                            | 11,512  |                              | $ | 6,289                        |  
|                                                     |  |                              |         |                              |   |                              |  

---

QuickLinks
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5405 

To suspend temporarily the duty on solder spheres containing 2 percent 

or more, by weight, of silver. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. HONDA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on solder spheres containing 

2 percent or more, by weight, of silver. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SOLDER SPHERES CONTAINING 2 PERCENT OR 

4 MORE, BY WEIGHT, OF SILVER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Solder spheres containing 

2 percent or more, by 

weight, of silver (provided 

for in subheading 

7115.90.40) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5405 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/10

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 10 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.56 N 76.20 W Meters AGL
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certification under Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Thomas F. Bradley, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Enesco Group, Inc.(the “Registrant”). 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the Registrant andwe have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect , the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of the internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s Board of Directors:
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.     /s/ Thomas F. Bradley   Interim Chief Executive Officer
29
EX-10.2





 Exhibit 10.2 

Execution Version 

September 13, 2021 
 Marquee Raine
Acquisition Corp. 
 65 East 55th Street 
 24th Floor 

New York, NY 10022 
 RE: Amendment to Sponsor
Agreement 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Reference is made to the letter agreement dated as of April 28, 2021 (the “Sponsor Agreement”), entered into and
delivered by Marquee Raine Acquisition Corp., a Cayman Islands exempted company (“MRAC”) and Marquee Raine Acquisition Sponsor LP, a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership (the “Sponsor”), in connection with
the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement dated as of April 28, 2021 and amended on July 23, 2021, by and among MRAC, MRAC Merger Sub Corp. and Enjoy Technology Inc. 

In consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
it is hereby agreed that the Sponsor Agreement is amended pursuant to Paragraph 9 thereof as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 Amendment to Paragraph 3. Paragraph 3 is hereby amended by deleting the number “1,121,250” and
replacing it with the number “2,201,250.” 


 Except as explicitly amended hereby, the Sponsor Agreement shall
continue, without amendment, in full force and effect from and after the date hereof. 
 The provisions of Sections 12, 13 and 14 of the
Sponsor Agreement are incorporated by reference into this letter agreement and shall apply mutatis mutandis to this letter agreement. 

This letter agreement may be executed in any number of original, electronic or facsimile counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for
all purposes be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. 
 [The
remainder of this page left intentionally blank.] 












 Please indicate your agreement to the terms of this Sponsor Agreement by signing where
indicated below. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	MARQUEE RAINE ACQUISITION SPONSOR LP
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Brandon W. Gardner

	Name:	 	Brandon W. Gardner
	Title:	 	Director
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas S. Ricketts

	Name:	 	Thomas S. Ricketts
	Title:	 	Director


 Acknowledged and agreed 

as of the date of this Sponsor Agreement: 
  

			
	MARQUEE RAINE ACQUISITION CORP.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Brett Varsov

	Name:	 	Brett Varsov
	Title:	 	Co-Chief Executive Officer

 [Signature Page to Amendment to Sponsor Agreement]