alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit  32


                              Certification
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
   and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of The  L.S. Starrett Company,  a Massachusetts
corporation  (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 2004 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and  information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 7, 2004                      	/s/ Douglas A. Starrett
	                                      Douglas A. Starrett
				               Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May 7, 2004                      	/s/ Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
	                                     	Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
				               Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United  States Code) and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The L.S. Starrett Company and will be retained by The L.S.
Starrett Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Exhibit  32


                              Certification
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
   and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of The  L.S. Starrett Company,  a Massachusetts
corporation  (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 26, 2005 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and  information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 5, 2005                          /s/ Douglas A. Starrett
	                                      Douglas A. Starrett
                                            Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May 5, 2005                          /s/ Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
                                            Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
                                            Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United  States Code) and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The L.S. Starrett Company and will be retained by The L.S.
Starrett Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### U. S. COAL & COKE CO. v. PARSONS et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 21, 1951.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 15, 1952.

James Sampson, Harlan, Middleton, Seel-bach, Wolford, Willis & Cochran, Louisville, for appellant.

George R. Pope, Harlan, for appellees.

MOREMEN, Justice.

The sole question presented by this appeal from a judgment approving an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board to appellee, Parsons, for disability, concerns whether he was injured by reason of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.

Appellee was injured while setting a cross-collar in appellant’s mine. A cross-collar is a beam used to support the roof of a mine. It is raised to the roof by means of a lifting jack, supports are placed at each end of the bar, and the jack is removed. The cross-collar of this incident was a round timber, 10 feet long, 6 inches in diameter, and weighed from 125 to 140 pounds. Parsons had one end of the beam on the jack and was lifting the other end of the bar up — a distance of about 3 feet— when pain struck him in the back. He said: “It was an awful pain, a dull, hard ache; I let the bar lay in the jack and went over and leaned against a timber.” The pain resulted from a herniated intervertebral disc. The record contains ample proof to the effect that a ruptured disc may be caused by severe strain, heavy lifting, or a twist of the back.

In the case of Harlan-Wallins Coal Corp. v. Lawson et al., Ky., 242 S.W.2d 999, we had before us the identical question presented here, with the exception that the injury was an inguinal hernia. We said: “The appellant contends that it is not sufficient simply to prove an injury to an employee, but that it must be shown that the disability resulted from a traumatic injury by accident. We take a different view of the case. Lawson described what he was doing, how he was performing his work, *443and said that, during the course of it, he felt a sudden, sharp pain in his left side. A hernia resulted. Should the reasoning of the appellant be accepted, it would be extremely difficult to show that a hernia resulted from the traumatic injury except in instances where the hernia was the result of an actual blow to one’s abdomen.”

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Florida Nonassociated Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Florida Nonassociated Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 4      | 0      | 14     | 0      | 0      | 0      | W      | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
HPV4 CHEMICAL DATA ADEQUACY REVIEW

T h e documents contained in this Data Set are data adequacy reviews for the 23 High

Production Volume chemicals listed for testing in the Test Rule for : Certain High Production

Volume Chemicals; Test Rule and Significant New Use R ule ; Fourth Group of Chemicals
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly report of Cytation Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin J. High, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company./s/  Kevin J. High
Kevin J. High
President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
August 5, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26382]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-475-819]


Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for 
the 1998 Countervailing Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce is extending the time limit for the 
final results of the third review of the countervailing duty order on 
certain pasta from Italy. The period of review is January 1 through 
December 31, 1998.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 13, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Matney or Annika O'Hara, Office 
of AD/CVD Enforcement I, Import Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
20230; telephone (202) 482-1778 or (202) 482-3798, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:

Applicable Statute

    Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are 
references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective 
date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the 
Uruguay Round Agreements Act. Unless otherwise indicated, all citations 
to the Department of Commerce's (the Department) regulations are to 19 
CFR part 351 (1999).

Background

    The preliminary results of this review were published in the 
Federal Register on August 8, 2000 (65 FR 48479). The final results are 
currently due no later than December 6, 2000.

Postponement

    Certain recent decisions by the United States Court of Appeals for 
the Federal Circuit have raised significant legal issues which must be 
considered in this case. Because of the complexity of these issues, it 
is not practicable to complete this review within the time limit 
mandated by section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Accordingly, the 
Department is extending the time limit for completion of these final 
results for 60 days (i.e., until February 5, 2001).
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).

    October 5, 2000.
Louis Apple,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-26382 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-106-005]


TransColorado Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

February 1, 2000.
    Take notice that on January 28, 2000, TransColorado Gas 
Transmission Company (TransColorado) tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, Fifth Revised Sheet No. 20, 
with an effective date of February 1, 2000.
    TransColorado states the filing is being made in compliance with 
the Commission's January 14, 2000, Order on Uncontested Settlement in 
Docket Nos. RP99-106-000 and -004 (the January 14 order). In the 
January 14 order, the Commission accepted the Interim Rates reflected 
on Sheet No. 20 to be effective February 1, 2000, as provided by 
Section II.A.6.b of the November 4, 1999, settlement that states 
Interim Rates will ``be in effect, subject to refund under Sec. III.F.1 
below, as maximum filed rates from the first day of the month following 
the date the Settlement is approved by the Commission until February 1, 
2001.''
    TransColorado states that a copy of this filing has been served 
upon parties to the proceeding TransColorado's customers, the Colorado 
Public Utilities Commission and the New Mexico Public Regulatory 
Commission.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://ww.fer.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-2660 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### SERVED: September2, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

In The Matter Of: GOLDRING, AARON Respondent 

### WASlllNGTON, DC ) ) ) ) 

### ) DocketNo. ·FAA-2015-1317 Case No. 2015EA150014
ORDERDISMISSING PROCEEDING On October 22,2015, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed. OnJanuary 4, 2016, the FAA filed an Amended Notice ofAppearance. On September 1, 2016, the FAA filed the Complainant's Withdrawal ofComplaint, stating that "[t]he Complainant
... withdraws the Complaint inthis case." After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Telephone Motion Conference set for September 21,2016, at 1:30 p.m Easterntime is canceled. 2. The Hearing set for December 6-8,2016, is canceled. 3. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the FAA has withdrawn its Complaint, and this proceeding is dismissed withprejudice.

Attachment: Service ListDocketNo. FAA-2015-1317 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST-BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001

Ms. Camille J. Castillo Complainant's Counsel Enforcement Division, Northeast Team 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3278 FAX: 718-995-5699 Mr. Aaron Goldring Respondent 1824 Henrickson Street Brooklyn, NY 11234 TEL: 718-840-9333 FAX: None Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation ONE COPY

1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00039

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.E.G. , B.M.A. Jr., and A.G.A., Children

From the 225th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021

- PA

- 00239

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order of Termination

is AFFIRMED. Because appellant is indigent, no costs of this appeal a re assessed against appellant.

SIGNED May 25, 2022.

_____________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
07/03/2012 08:34 FAX 2024835142 FAA "' OMS @001/002 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RECEIVED 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION JUN 2 ~ 20J2 

HEARING DOCK·ET 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 

Complainant, 

V. 

THE LIBERTY FOUNDATION, INC., 

Respondent. 

-------------------------------' 

FAA Case No: 

2011-GL-03-0070 

1 

aot~;fJ'-177; 

RESPONDENT'S HEARING REQUEST 

Respondent, THE LIBERTY FOUNDATION, INC., by and through its undersigned 

attorneys, pursuant to 14 CFR §13.16 and 14 CFR §13.21 0, herewith requests a 

hearing on the Administrator's Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty dated June 5, 

2012, received June 8, 2012. 

Stuart A. Goldstein, P. A. 

9350 South Dixie Highway, 1Oth Floor 

Miami, FL 33156 

Tel: (305) 670-1222 

Fax: (305) 670-7065 

Email: stuartgoldsteinpa@.~t1.J1!3J 

Attorney for Respondent : 

By: !ri;'l. 

Stuart A. 

~ib Goldstein 

$Illt\nTC'iPlQSCE!Nt'A("'AI IN!;! 

,' 

,., 
07/03/2012 08:34 FAX 2024935142 FAA + OMS 141002/002 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this 20th day of June, 2012, the original and one 

copy of this Request was served via United States mail on: Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D. C., 20591, attention 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-4301 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 000, and that a copy 

was served via facsimile (847) 294~7498 and regular United States Mail upon Adrianne 

Wojcik, Esq., Office of the Regional Counsel, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 

60018. 

By:_kmt_o_~ Stuart A. Goldstein 

$"CUABTGOLDSTEINPNIU>IJJ£I .
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1834 Prepped byKeeiaRichards



### Document

Number: 

# 3 ) VI-C-0 2 Docket Number: 

# A-90-07

Printed 11/10/20082:14:33 PM

Sheet 3 of 61P. 2

rf <» SM ,

r ^. UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y

NATIONA LVEHICL E AN D FUE LEMISSION S LABORATOR Y

256 5 PLYMOUT H ROA D AN N ARBOR , MICHIGA N 4810 5 

# 4-W-0 7

fin u •> 3 199 * OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N
Mr . Jonathan E . Rind e Manko , Gold , an

d Katche r Suit e 50 0 40 1 Cit yAvenu e Bal a Cynwyd , P A1900 4 Dea r Mr . Rinde : 

# ft 

# - -\99 5 \l ^

• i u\

- ^ T
I a mreplying t o you r lette r o f Novembe r 4 , 199 4 summarizing ou r conversation s regarding th e applicabilit yt o you r clien t o f th e term"fue l manufacturer" , a s use d i nth e Fuel s and Fue l Additive s (F/FA ) Registratio n rule . Base d o n th e descriptio no f you r clien t i n tha t letter , you r clien t i s no t viewe d a s a fue l manufacture r fo r th e purpose s o f EPA' s F/F Aregistratio nprogram . The reasoning behind thi s conclusio ni s that , regardles s o f you r client' s ownershi p statu s vis-a-vi s th e quantitie s o f fue l bein g additized , you r clien t i s acting a t th e directio no f it s gasolin e wholesaler s and retailer s i nan arrangemen t aki nt o a n"agency " relationship . B

yneithe r causing no r directing th e alteratio n o f th e fuel s unde r it s control , you r clien t doe s no t mee t th e requirement s o f th e definitio no f "fue l manufacturer " a t 4 0 CFR§ 79.2(d) . Th e gasolin e wholesaler s o r retailer s wh o ar e directing you r clien t t o additiz e fue l ar e "fue l manufacturers " unde r 4 0 CF R§ 79.2(d ) . I n ou r conversations , I misstate d EPA' s positio na s t o th e relevanc e o f you r client' s ownershi p o r "bar e titlehold " t o th e fue l (s ) whic hwer e bein g additized . Thi s facto r i s no t relevan t t o determining whethe r an entit yi s involve d i nth e "introductio n int o commerce " o f a fue l unde r 4 0 CFR§ 79.2(d) . I f I can b e o f furthe r assistance , pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t m e a t (313 ) 741
- 7825 , 8A

Mt o 4PM . Sincerely , VtA ^

Ken t M . Helme r cc : MaryElle n Levine , OGC Susmit a Dubey , OGC Jud yGray , OM S

Printed on Recycled

Paper
**Exhibit 10.5****Annual Compensation of Non-Employee Directors**On January 31, 2006, based on its review of the CEO’s recommendations, the Compensation Committeeapproved the following compensation for the Non-Employee Directors of the Company:               **2006**  **2005**  **2005** **Name/Position** **Retainer**  **Retainer**  **Cash Incentive** Jacques Rebibo, Non-Executive Chairman $38,875  $37,000  $25,000 J. Randy Babbitt, Non-Employee Director $26,875  $25,000  $25,000 Thomas Kody, Non-Employee Director $26,875  $25,000  $25,000 John W. Edgemond IV, Non-Employee Director $26,875  $25,000  $25,000 James L. Jadlos, Non-Employee Director $26,875  $25,000  $25,000 For the Non-Executive Chairman, $1,000 of the indicated 2005 and 2006 retainer amounts are paidmonthly, totaling $12,000 per year. The balance of the 2005 retainer and cash incentive for allNon-Employee Directors, including the Chairman, was paid in February 2006. The 2006 Retainer willbe paid by quarterly installments in the month following the end of each fiscal quarter for 2006.In addition, 1,000 options were issued to each non-employee director on December 30, 2005.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00339-CR

IN RE GARY DWAYNE BARNETT

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. 

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed November 13, 2014

[OT06]
In re Gary Dwayne Barnett Page 2
Exhibit 32(2)



CERTIFICATION BY
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



In connection with the Quarterly Report of 7-Eleven, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward W. Moneypenny, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    EDWARD W. MONEYPENNYEdward W. Moneypenny Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 7-Eleven, Inc.




Tab 5