alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I

N T H E C O U R

T O F C R I M I N A L A P P EA L S O F T EX A S
N O . A P - 75, 873

EX PA R TE D A G M A R FE H R M A N N G A H A G A N , A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 9 9 5 2 0 6 - A I N T HE 3 3 8 TH DI S TR I CT COURT

FROM HA RRI S CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursu an t t o t h e provisions of Article 11.07 of the Te x as Code of Criminal Proce dure, the cler k of t he trial court tra

nsmitt ed to this Court thi s application for writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted of manslaug hter and sentenc ed to five y ears’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appea ls affirme d her conviction. Ga haga n v . S

tate , No. 01-06-062- CR (Tex. App. - Houston [1 ], deliver ed September 27, 2007, no st pet.). Applicant conte nds that her appe l l at e c o un s el re n d er edi n ef fe ct i v e a s s i s t an ce b ec au se counse l failed to timely file a petition f or discretionar

y revie w afte r ag ree ing to f ile one. Appe llate counse lGAHAG AN - 2

filed an a ffidavit with the trial c ourt. Ba sed on that af fidavit, the trial cour

t has enter ed finding s of fac t and conc lusions of law that ap p el l at e counsel failed to timely file a pe tition for discretionar y revie w af ter a g ree ing to f

ile one. See Ex parte W

ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, theref

ore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of -time petition fo r d isc re tio na

ry re vie w o f t

he jud g me nt o f the F ir st Court of Ap pe a ls i n Ca us e No
. 01 -0 6- 06 2- CR that a ff ir me d he r c on vic tio n in

Ca se No
. 99 52 06 fr om t he 33 8th Judic ia l D istri c t Co ur

t o f Ha rr is County . App lic ant s ha ll f ile he r pe tit ion for di sc re tio na

ry re vie w w iththe F ir st

Court of Ap pe a ls wi thi n 3 0 d ay s o f t

he date on

wh ic h th is C ourt ’s mand a te iss ue s.

Deliver ed: Marc h 19, 2008 Do no t pu bli sh
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Western District of Texas

Plaintiff

v. 6:20-CV-00487-ADA

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT

12/16/2021

Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP

333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200

Redwood Shores, California 94065

ZTE CORPORATION ET AL.

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT

(650) 453-5171

(650) 453-5170

mbarber@kasowitz.com

/s/ Marcus A. Barber

Attorney’s signature

Marcus A. Barber (CA Bar No. 307361)

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 133 Filed 12/16/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









I, David
Coriaty, Chief Executive officer (and Principal Financial Accounting Officer) of
Explorations Group Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Explorations Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Explorations Group, Inc. and its
subsidiaries.




Pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished
and is not deemed filed.




Date:
      April 15, 2009
            /s/
      David Coriary
              David
      Coriary
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              and
      Principal Financial Accounting
Officer
EXHIBIT 32

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA-DTG Document 212-2 Filed 08/15/22 Page 1 of 4
Exhibit Z

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA-DTG Document 212-2 Filed 08/15/22 Page 2 of 4 Case 6:21-cv-00128-ADA Document 95-3 Filed 08/01/22 Page 1 of 3
Contact

www.linkedin.com/in/stuart-as-60a7695 (LinkedIn)

Top Skills

Commercial Litigation

Trade Secrets

Intellectual Property

Stuart A. S.

President at Brazos Licensing and Development

Los Angeles, California, United States

Summary

Prior to co-founding WSOU Investments and its affiliate companies,

Stuart served as the General Counsel for Wade & Company, a

venture capital firm and as the managing partner of the Los Angeles

and Century City offices of the international law firm, Reed Smith

LLP. As a 20-year partner in Reed Smith, he was a member of

the commercial litigation group where he specialized in complex

commercial and intellectual property disputes. He serves on the

Board of Directors, The Campbell Hall School and served on the

Board of Directors of the Los Angeles Urban League from January

2005 until December 2017. He received a B.A. from Boston College

and a J.D. from George Washington University.

Experience

Brazos Licensing and Development

President

August 2017 - Present (5 years 1 month)

Waco, Texas, United States

President, Brazos Licensing and Development

Wade & Company

General Counsel

March 2016 - May 2019 (3 years 3 months)

Greater Los Angeles Area

Reed Smith

Partner

January 1997 - March 2016 (19 years 3 months)

Greater Los Angeles Area

Bell, Boyd & Lloyd

Summer Associate, Associate, Partner

September 1989 - December 1996 (7 years 4 months)

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Page 1 of 2

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA-DTG Document 212-2 Filed 08/15/22 Page 3 of 4 Case 6:21-cv-00128-ADA Document 95-3 Filed 08/01/22 Page 2 of 3
Education

The George Washington University Law School

JD  · (1986 - 1989)

Boston College

BA, Economics, Philosophy · (1982 - 1986)

Page 2 of 2

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA-DTG Document 212-2 Filed 08/15/22 Page 4 of 4 Case 6:21-cv-00128-ADA Document 95-3 Filed 08/01/22 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 15.3**

*RegisteredOffice: 51 Reserve Road Telephone: +61 (0)8 9293 7449 Pickering Brook Facsimile: +61 (0)8 9293 7459 Western Australia 6076 E-Mail:*info@piranmining.com.au *ACN120 266 999 Website:*www.piranmining.com.au The Board of Directors of Randgold Resources Limited (the “Company”)March 28, 2017 Re: Consent Ladies and Gentlemen: I, Timothy Peters, do herebyconsent to the reference of myself in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the“Annual Report’) to which this consent is an exhibit, to any reference to Mr. Timothy Peters under the heading “Experts”in any registration statement into which the Annual Report is incorporated by reference, and to the citation and/or summarizationof the reserve statement in the Annual Report as calculated by me for the Gounkoto underground ore reserves and Kibali undergroundore reserves. Dated this 28lh day of March 2017. By: Name: TimothyPeters Title: Consultant 56361137.1 Piran mining pty ltd atf the T & A petersfamily trust abn 14 330 471 566
NO. 07-02-0342-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

APRIL 14, 2003

______________________________

LUIS IGNACIO AGUIRRE, APPELLANT

V.

NORTHWEST TEXAS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. AND

UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 108th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 88,725; HONORABLE ABE LOPEZ, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

OPINION

Luis Ignacio Aguirre appeals from an order of dismissal in his suit against Northwest

Texas Healthcare Systems, Inc. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
2

In May, 2001, Luis Ignacio Aguirre sued Northwest Texas Healthcare Systems, Inc.,

and Universal Health Services. Northwest answered the suit on May 16, 2001. Universal

filed a Special Appearance on December 12, 2001. In due course, Northwest filed a

Motion to Dismiss, subsequently amended, by which it asserted Aguirre’s alleged

noncompliance with TEX. REV. CIV. STAT. ANN. art. 4590i (Vernon Supp. 2002). The trial

court dismissed Aguirre’s claim with prejudice by order signed on July 10, 2002. The order

did not address Aguirre’s claims against Universal. The order contained a Mother

Hubbard clause that “All relief requested and not expressly granted herein is DENIED.”

Aguirre’s claims against Northwest were not severed from his claims against Universal. 

Aguirre appealed the dismissal. Northwest has moved to dismiss the appeal.

Northwest asserts that the order of July 10, 2002, is interlocutory and not appealable.

To be a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken, the judgment must

dispose of all parties and all issues in the case. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39

S.W.3d 191, 205 (Tex. 2001). Whether a judicial decree is a final judgment must be

determined from its language and the record in the case. Id.at 195. The inclusion of a

Mother Hubbard clause--the statement, "all relief not granted is denied," or essentially

those words–is not conclusive indication that a judgment rendered without a conventional

trial is final for purposes of appeal. Id. at 203-04. An order that disposes of claims against

one of multiple defendants does not adjudicate claims by or against other defendants. Id.

at 205. If the record reveals the existence of parties or claims not mentioned in the order,

the order is not final. Id. at 206. 
3

Aguirre’s claims against Universal were not addressed by the July 10th order.

According to the record before us, those claims continue. The order from which Aguirre

appeals is not final for purposes of appeal. We do not have jurisdiction. Northwest’s

motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. 

Per Curiam
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

Pursuant to section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on August 4, 2000, Irix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 101 Technology Place, Florence, South Carolina 29501, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of methylphenidate (1724), a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule II.

The firm plans to manufacture methylphenidate for demonstration purposes and for dosage form development and stability studies.

Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration.

Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than December 12, 2000.

Dated: September 28, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-26371 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5438 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5438

         To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Fipronil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Fipronil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIPRONIL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.16 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Fipronil) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated May 1, 2000, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on May 12, 2000, (65 FR 30614), Dupont Pharmaceuticals, 1000 Stewart Avenue, Garden City, New York 11530, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of 
                    ( print page 60978)
                    the basic classes of controlled substances listed below: Drug
ScheduleOxycodone (9143)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
II
 The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances to make finished products. DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Dupont Pharmaceuticals to manufacture the listed controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Dupont Pharmaceuticals on a regular basis to ensure that the company's continued registration is consistent with the public interest. These investigations have included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed above is granted. Dated: August 18, 2000. John H. King, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 00-26367 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 October 31, 2005 Before Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Chief Judge , Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge No. 04-2959 MARIA DOLORES CUELLAR LOPEZ, Petitioner , v. ALBERTO R.GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent . On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. No. A78-125-697

O R D E R The Court, sua sponte , corrects its Opinion of October 26, 2005, to read as follows: Before F

LAUM , Chief Judge , and B AUER and W OOD , Circuit Judges . S O O RDERED .
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 548 

To repeal a rule of the National Mediation Board relating to representation 

election procedures. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2011 

Mr. GINGREY of Georgia (for himself, Mr. KLINE, and Mr. ISSA) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To repeal a rule of the National Mediation Board relating 

to representation election procedures. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Democracy 

5 in the Workplace Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RULE. 

7 Effective January 1, 2011, the rule prescribed by the 

8 National Mediation Board relating to representation elec9 tion procedures published on May 11, 2010 (95 Fed. Reg. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 548 IH

1 26062) and revising sections 1202 and 1206 of title 29, 

2 Code of Federal Regulations, shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

FINJAN, INC., §

§

Plaintiff/Movant, §

§

v. § 1:20-CV-652-RP

§

SONICWALL, INC., §

§

Defendant, §

§

DELL, INC., §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

United States Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower ruled on the motion to compel giving rise 

to this case (which was formerly designated a miscellaneous rather than civil case) on July 2, 2020. 

(Mot. Compel, Dkt. 1; Docket Entry, July 1, 2020; Order, Dkt. 29; see also Text Order, June 23, 2020 

(referring the motion to compel to Judge Hightower for disposition)). In her Order, Judge 

Hightower instructed Respondent Dell, Inc. to produce responsive documents by July 15, 2020,

1

and 

returned the case to the undersigned’s docket. (Order, Dkt. 29, at 3–4). No party filed any motions, 

notices, or other documents after Judge Hightower’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the case is CLOSED.

SIGNED on July 23, 2020.

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 The order listed “July 15, 2000”; the Court interprets that date from context as July 15, 2020. (Order, Dkt. 

29, at 3).

Case 1:20-cv-00652-RP Document 30 Filed 07/23/20 Page 1 of 1
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Win Gaming Media, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 8, 2009

                                                       /s/ Jacob Bar-Shalom
                                                       --------------------
                                                       Jacob Bar-Shalom
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
```
|**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**                                           
|**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**                    

In connection with the Annual Report of MCG Diversified, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof or immediately
thereafter (the "Report"), I Marguerite Godels, President, Chairman of the Board
of Directors, and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company

|/s/ MARGUERITE GODELS                                                                          
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Marguerite Godels, President, Chairman of the Board of Directors,
      Chief Executive Officer
|November 25, 2003                                                                              

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
to be filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

|
|
Case 5:20-cv-00678-OLG-HJB Document 159 Filed 10/04/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 5:20-cv-00678-OLG-HJB Document 159 Filed 10/04/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 5:20-cv-00678-OLG-HJB Document 159 Filed 10/04/21 Page 3 of 4
Case 5:20-cv-00678-OLG-HJB Document 159 Filed 10/04/21 Page 4 of 4