alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                       STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
                   ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 (the "Quarterly Report"), of Southern California Edison Company (the
"Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the best of his knowledge,
that:

1.      The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2.      The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 4, 2005

                                             /S/ Alan J. Fohrer
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Alan J. Fohrer
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             Southern California Edison Company

                                             /s/ Thomas M. Noonan
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Thomas M. Noonan
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             Southern California Edison Company

This statement accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 562 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 562

  To amend the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Act to improve the Alaska 
    pipeline construction training program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2011

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Act to improve the Alaska 
    pipeline construction training program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALASKA PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION TRAINING PROGRAM.

    Section 113 of the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Act (15 U.S.C. 720k) 
is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1)(B), by striking ``support an 
        Alaska gas pipeline training program.'' and inserting 
        ``support--
                            ``(i) an Alaska gas pipeline training 
                        program; and
                            ``(ii) a program to train workers in the 
                        construction, operation, maintenance, and 
                        performance of all related environmental 
                        processes involving existing and future oil and 
                        gas infrastructure in Alaska.'';
            (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Requirements for Grants.--The Secretary shall make a grant 
under subsection (a) only if the Governor of the State of Alaska 
requests the grant funds and certifies in writing to the Secretary that 
there is a need for the funds in order to ensure an adequately skilled, 
safe, and competent workforce--
            ``(1) to construct, operate, and maintain an Alaska natural 
        gas pipeline system; or
            ``(2) to construct, operate, maintain, and perform all 
        related environmental processes involving existing and future 
        oil and gas infrastructure in Alaska.''; and
            (3) in the second sentence of subsection (c), by striking 
        ``15 percent'' and inserting ``50 percent''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended on September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and to which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Sarah H. Moore, the
principal financial officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 6, 2008



/s/    SARAH H.
MOORESarah H. Moore Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and will be retained by The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-5237 September Term, 2022 1: 21-c v -029 68-CJN Filed O n: Decem ber 1 3, 2 022 Larry Eugene Clark,

App ellant
v . Merrick B. Garlan d, e t al.,

App ellees ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Kat sas a nd W alker, Circuit Ju dges, a nd Sen telle, Sen ior Circuit

Judge J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P

. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s S ept em ber 1 , 20 22, orde r be af f irmed . T he district cou rt prop erly dism issed t he case beca use app ellantfailed to esta blish h is stan ding to sue. Se e L ujan v. Defend ers of W ildlife , 50 4 U.S . 55 5, 5 73-7 4 (199 2) (“[A] p laintif

f raising only a gene rally available grievance ab outgov ernm ent— claimin g only harm t o h is and every citiz en’s in terestin p rope r app lication of the Constitu tion and laws, and seekin g relief tha t no m ore d irectly

an d ta ngibly

be nef its him tha n it d oes the pu blic at large — do es n ot st ate an Article II I case or co ntroversy .”). App ellant ’s allegation s ab outm anip ulate d votes d o n ot co nstitu te a pa rticulariz ed injury

. See La nce v . Cof

f ma n, 5 49 U.S. 4 37, 44 2 (20 07) (pe r curiam ).

# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-5237 September Term, 2022
Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
Exhibit 32(1)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of 7-Eleven, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. Keyes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ James W. KeyesJames W. KeyesPresident and Chief Executive Officer7-Eleven, Inc.




Tab 4
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5716 

To establish a Skin Cancer Research Fund to increase funding for the 

conduct or support of research relating to skin cancer by the National 

Institutes of Health. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mr. BILBRAY (for himself and Mrs. MALONEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To establish a Skin Cancer Research Fund to increase funding for the conduct or support of research relating to 

skin cancer by the National Institutes of Health. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Melanoma Research 

5 Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SKIN CANCER RESEARCH FUND. 

7 (a) CREATION OF FUND.—There is established in the 

8 Treasury of the United States a trust fund to be known 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5716 IH

1 as the ‘‘Skin Cancer Research Fund’’, consisting of such 

2 amounts as may be deposited into the Skin Cancer Re3 search Fund under subsection (b). 

4 (b) TRANSFER TO FUND OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS.— 

5 For each of fiscal years 2013 through 2017, there shall 

6 be deposited into the Skin Cancer Research Fund amounts 

7 equivalent to the taxes received in the Treasury during 

8 the respective fiscal year under section 5000B of the In9 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 5000B; relating 

10 to taxes on indoor tanning services). 

11 (c) LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF AMOUNTS IN

12 FUND.—Amounts in the Skin Cancer Research Fund shall 

13 be available, as provided by appropriation Acts, exclusively 

14 for the conduct or support of research relating to skin can15 cer by the National Institutes of Health under title IV 

16 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 281 et seq.). 

17 (d) DEFINITION.—In this Act, the term ‘‘skin can18 cer’’ means any of the following: 

19 (1) Actinic keratosis. 

20 (2) Basal cell carcinoma. 

21 (3) Melanoma. 

22 (4) Kaposi’s sarcoma. 

23 (5) Squamous cell carcinoma. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NO. 07-10-00229-CR 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL C 

MARCH 14, 2011 

WILLIAM EARNEST KIRKHAM, JR., APPELLANT 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 FROM THE 31ST DISTRICT COURT OF HEMPHILL COUNTY; 

NO. 2702; HONORABLE STEVEN RAY EMMERT, JUDGE 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Appellant, William Earnest Kirkham, Jr., was convicted of theft of property of the 

value of $1,500 and less than $20,000,1 enhanced for punishment by proof of two prior 

felony convictions.2

 Appellant was sentenced to serve 18 years in the Institutional 

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant has appealed the 

judgment of the trial court. We affirm. 

 1

 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.03(a) (West Supp. 2010). 

2

 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.42(a)(2) (West Supp. 2010). 
2 

 Appellant=s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967). In support of his 

motion to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in 

his opinion, the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be 

predicated. Id. at 744-45. In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 

(Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel has candidly discussed why, under the controlling 

authorities, there is no error in the trial court=s judgment. Additionally, counsel has 

certified that he has provided appellant a copy of the Anders brief and motion to 

withdraw and appropriately advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response in this 

matter. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). The court has 

also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response. Appellant has not filed a 

response. 

By his Anders brief, counsel raises grounds that could possibly support an 

appeal, but concludes the appeal is frivolous. We have reviewed these grounds and 

made an independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any 

arguable grounds which might support an appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 

109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 

(Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We have found no such arguable grounds and agree with 

counsel that the appeal is frivolous. 
3 

Accordingly, counsel=s motion to withdraw is hereby granted and the trial court=s 

judgment is affirmed. 3 

 Mackey K. Hancock 

 Justice 

Do not publish. 

 3

Counsel shall, within five days after this opinion is handed down, send his client 

a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of appellant=s right to file a 

pro se petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5492 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain twisted yarn of viscose 

rayon. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

twisted yarn of viscose rayon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN TWISTED YARN OF VISCOSE RAYON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.54.04 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 single yarn of viscose rayon, with a twist exceeding 120 

7 turns/m) is amended by striking the date in the effective 

8 period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5492 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61302-61303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26561]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Changes to Section IV of the Field Office 
Technical Guide (FOTG) of the Natural Resources Conservation Service in 
Indiana

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in Section IV of the 
FOTG of the NRCS in Indiana for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 61303]]

SUMMARY: It is the intention of NRCS in Indiana to issue a revised 
conservation practice standard in Section IV of the FOTG. The revised 
standard is Wetland Enhancement (Code 659). This practice may be used 
in conservation systems that treat highly erodible land and/or 
wetlands.

DATES: Comments will be received on or before November 16, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Address all requests and comments to Jane E. Hardisty, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 6013 
Lakeside Blvd., Indianapolis, Indiana 46278. Copies of this standard 
will be made available upon written request. You may submit your 
electronic requests and comments to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#593d382b2b3c3535773b2b362e37193037772c2a3d38773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4125203333242d2d6f23332e362f01282f6f343225206f262e37">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane E. Hardisty, 317-290-3200.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that after enactment of the 
law, revisions made to NRCS state technical guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland 2 provisions of the law, shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS 
in Indiana will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. 
Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in 
Indiana regarding disposition of those comments and a final 
determination of changes will be made.

    Dated: October 2, 2000.
Ron Lauster,
State Resource Conservationist, Indianapolis, Indiana.
[FR Doc. 00-26561 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

ZTE CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00487-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00488-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00489-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00490-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00491-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00492-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00493-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00494-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00495-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00496-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00497-ADA-DTG

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES

This Court, having considered disputes raised by Defendant ZTE Corporation 

(“Defendant”) and Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development

(“Plaintiff”) during the June 21, 2022, Discovery Hearing, hereby ORDERS the following:

1. Defendant’s request to compel Plaintiff to tender its 30(b)(6) witnesses is DENIED 

AS MOOT. 

2. The current July 1, 2022 deadline for the close of fact discovery is extended to 

August 1, 2022. The parties will further meet-and-confer regarding respective extensions to the 

subsequent deadlines for the docket schedule for the Court’s consideration.

3. Defendant’s request to compel Plaintiff’s production of documents (1) responsive 

to Defendant’s initial 70 Requests for Production and (2) from sister WDTX cases is again 

DENIED; although the Court previously GRANTED Defendant’s request to compel by email 

Case 6:20-cv-00490-ADA-DTG Document 202 Filed 06/29/22 Page 1 of 2
order, the Court subsequently reconsidered and DENIED Defendant’s request to compel. (Case 

No. 6:20-cv-00487-ADA, Dkt. 185). 

4. Defendant’s request to compel Plaintiff’s production of unredacted versions of the 

sealed filings and respective attachments, declarations, exhibits, and affidavits thereto (including 

Dkts. 135, 155, and 167) in WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. 

Microsoft Corporation, Case No. 6:20-cv-00454-ADA (W.D. Tex.), is DENIED.

5. Defendant’s request to compel Plaintiff’s production of unredacted versions of the 

sealed filings and respective attachments, declarations, exhibits, and affidavits thereto (including 

Dkts. 53, 61, 67, 71, and 75) in WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development 

v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Case No. 6:20-cv-00730-ADA (W.D. Tex.), is DENIED.

6. Defendant’s request to compel Plaintiff’s production of security and loan 

agreements with BP Funding Trust and OT Terrier Holdings is DENIED.

7. Plaintiff’s request for costs and fees is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The 

Court is reluctant to award costs and fees at this time, but will consider them in the future should 

either party re-raise previously adjudicated disputes. 

Signed this 29th day of June, 2022.

____________________________________

DEREK GILLILAND

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00490-ADA-DTG Document 202 Filed 06/29/22 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) 

INC., AND ZTE (TX), INC. 

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-497-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Please take notice that attorney Brian M. Koide of the law firm ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, 

PLLC appears as counsel of record for Plaintiff WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC. Mr. Koide 

hereby requests that all notices required to be given, and all papers required to be served in the 

above-entitled and numbered cause, be copied to and served upon him.

Dated: November 3, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Brian M. Koide

Brian M. Koide 

Virginia Bar No. 46,329

ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Telephone: (703) 565-2852

Facsimile: (817) 887-5950 

brian@etheridgelaw.com

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA Document 31 Filed 11/03/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document was served upon all counsel of record via the 

Court's CM/ECF electronic filing system in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure on November 3, 2020.

/s/ Brian M. Koide

Brian M. Koide

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA Document 31 Filed 11/03/20 Page 2 of 2