alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Logistics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB as of August 31, 2002 and for the three months ended August 31,
2002 and 2001 (the "Quarterly Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen M. Harris, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

By:  /s/ Stephen M. Harris                               October 21, 2002
     --------------------------------------
        Stephen M. Harris
        President, Chief Executive Officer
        and Interim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Randgold Resources Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, D. Mark Bristow, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ D. Mark Bristow     | 
|----------------------- | 
|D. Mark Bristow         | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|March 31, 2016          |
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DOUGLAS L. JAMES, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-266

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed July 6, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, 

Judge.

Douglas L. James, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Smith v. State, 537 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 1989); Hart v. State, 

464 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 12

Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-20 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-20 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-20 Filed 03/05/21 Page 3 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-20 Filed 03/05/21 Page 4 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-20 Filed 03/05/21 Page 5 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-20 Filed 03/05/21 Page 6 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-20 Filed 03/05/21 Page 7 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-20 Filed 03/05/21 Page 8 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-20 Filed 03/05/21 Page 9 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-20 Filed 03/05/21 Page 10 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-20 Filed 03/05/21 Page 11 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-20 Filed 03/05/21 Page 12 of 13
Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 46-20 Filed 03/05/21 Page 13 of 13
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,493
<INVENTORY>                                     66,013
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,805
<PP&E>                                          83,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,938
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,154
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,328
<SALES>                                        143,623
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               143,623
<CGS>                                           79,356
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,923
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (923)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,787)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,515)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,272)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,272)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00406

- CV

T HE P ARKS OF D EER C REEK

H OMEOWNERS A SSOCIATION

, I NC

. , Appellant

V

.

A VANTI N. H UNTER , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from t he 141st District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 141

- 315132

- 20 )

July 29, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant The Park s of Deer Creek Home o wners

Association, Inc. shall pay all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

Justice Dabney Bassel
# Pe

# n o b s 

# c

# o tt II 

# n d ii 

# a 

# n 

# N a tt ii 

# o n Trr ii 

# b a ll 

# L a 

# n 

# d s Map Created by Christina Stringer July 

## 242013 Data Source Base 

### Map Bing 

### Maps Tribal Boundaries 

## US 2010 Census Penobscot Indian Nation Department of Natural Resources 0 5 10 20 30 40Miles

0 4 8 16 24 32 Miles 

### Fee Land
Trust Land
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Patrick J. Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Patrick J. Moore    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Patrick J. Moore        |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| May 11, 2009       |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc.and will be retained by Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7750
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SAMUEL CLIVE PHILLIPS, a/k/a Jungle, a/k/a Culture, a/k/a David, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-131, CA-97-408-2) Submitted: February 24, 1998 Decided: March 17, 1998 Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Clive Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Arenda L. Wright Allen, Assistant United States Attorney, Kevin Michael Comstock, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the court's previous order denying him relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Phillips , Nos. CR-93-131; CA-97- 408-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


OF
SKINNY NUTRITIONAL CORP.


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Skinny Nutritional Corp. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald Wilson,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1)
    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date: April
      7, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Ronald WilsonRonald
      WilsonChief
      Executive Officer




This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 32.01

DEER VALLEY CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of Deer Valley Corporation (the Company), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles G. Masters, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Charles G. Masters               
|Charles G. Masters                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 9, 2010
### National Tribal Caucus Meeting December 8, 2009 Meeting Note to the Docket

NTC CONFERENCE CALL AGENDA

Conference Call Date : Tuesday, December 8, 2009 Call Time: 3:10-4:00pm (ET)TC/AIEO/NIWG Session Dial-In Number: (866) 299-3188 Conference Code: 2025640378# Physical Location: EPA EAST BLDG. AIEO Conference Room 3324

III. NTC/AIEO/NIWG Joint Session – 3:10 - 4:00 pm ET 1. Roll Call 2. AIEO Updates National Tribal Summit overview on tribal environme ntal concerns AIEO outreach activities to tribes 3. Peer matching/technical assistance method disc ussion – Garret Smith NTC review of Chris’ memo Voucher info submitted 4. Tribal NSR Rule – Jessica Montanez

Discussion Topics

On December 8, 2009, representatives from the US En vironmental Protection Agency (EPA) participated in a meeting to update the Natio nal Tribal Caucus on the status of the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and Modificatio ns in Indian Country.” Representatives from the US EPA updated the Nationa l Tribal Caucus on:

• What is the purpose of the rule?

• What types of sources will be regulated under the r ule?

• Projected Schedule for Finalizing the Rule
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C ATALINO DELGADILLO-GARC IA, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-72323 Age n c y No. A073-419-050 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d M arc h 10, 2015 ** B e fore : FARRIS, WARDLAW , a nd PAEZ, C irc uit Judge s. C ata lino De lga dillo-Ga

rc ia , a nat ive an d c itiz e n of Gua t e m a la , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ation for a sy lum , withholding of rem o v a l, a nd re lie f unde r the C onve ntion Aga inst Torture(“ C AT” ).



# F IL ED MAR 17 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, Ze haty e v . Gonzale s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th C ir. 2006), a

nd we de ny the pe tition for re v i e w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the B IA’ s finding tha

t De lga dillo-Ga

rc ia ’ s e xpe rie nc e s with theGuate m a la n gue rrilla s a

nd the Guate m a la

n Na v y did not rise to the le v e l of pe rse c ution. Se e Hox ha v . Ashc roft , 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th C ir. 2003). In thea

bse nc e of pa s t pe rse c ution, De lga d illo-Ga rc ia ’ s hum anita

rian a sy lum c la im

ne c e ssa rily fa i ls. Se e 8 C .F.R . § 1208.13(b)(1)(iii). De lga dilloGarc ia doe s not c la i m

a w e ll-founde d

fe ar of future pe rse c ution ba se d on his pa st e xpe rie nc e s in Gua

te m a l a and doe s not othe rwise c ha lle n ge the B IA’ s de te rm i nation tha

t he ha s fa i l e d to e s ta

blish a we l l-founde d fe ar of pe rse c ution. Se e Martine

z-Se rrano v . IN

S , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th C ir. 1996) (issue s not spe c ific a lly

ra ise d a nd a rgue d in a pa rty ’ s ope ning brie f are wa ive d). Thus, De lga dillo-Ga

rc ia ’ s a sy lum

c la im fa ils. B e c a use De lga dillo-Ga

rc ia fa i le d to m e e t the lowe r sta nda rd of proof for a sy lum , he ne c e s sa

rily fa ile d to m e e t the m ore stringe nt sta n da rd for withholding of re m ova l. Se e Ze h aty e , 453 F.3d a t 1190.

1 1 - 7 2 3 2 3 2Fina lly , De lga dillo-Ga rc ia doe s not c ha lle n ge the B IA’ s de n ia l of his C AT c la im . Se e Martine

z-Se rrano , 94 F.3d a

t 1259-60. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 1 - 7 2 3 2 3 3
#### LOVE v. STATE.

No. 22618.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 10, 1943.

*81Shelburne H. Glover, of Jefferson, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors for the purpose of sale in a dry area. The punishment assessed is a fine of $100.

No notice of appeal appears in the record, in the absence of which this court is without jurisdiction to consider the case. See Art. 827, C.CP., and cases cited in Vernon’s Ann.Tex.C.C.P., Vol. 3, note 2; also Branch’s Ann.Tex.P.C., sec. 588, and cases cited.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the forthcoming regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board). 

# DATE AND TIME:

The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on October 12, 2000, from 9:00 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kelly Mikel Williams, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4025, TDD (703) 883-4444. 

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available). In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are: 

## Open Session 

###                     1.                    *Approval of Minutes*

September 14, 2000 (Open and Closed). 

###                     2.                     *Report*

Corporate Approvals Report. 

### 1. New Business—Other 

Corporate and Chartering Approvals (Consent Action). 

                    A.                     *ACA Formations*

1. Valley AgCredit, PCA/FLCA 

2. FCS of Eastern Missouri, PCA/FLCA 

3. Eastern Arkansas, PCA/FLCA 

                    B.                     *ACA Restructuring*

1. Farm Credit of South Florida, ACA 

                    C.                     *Conversions to ACAs*

1. Heritage Land Bank, FLCA 

2. Panhandle Plains PCA 

3. AgTexas FCS 

4. AgriLand FCS 

Dated: October 5, 2000.

Kelly Mikel Williams, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-26105 Filed 10-5-00; 4:25 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC. 

AND ZTE (TX), INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00487-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00488-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00489-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00490-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00491-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00492-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00493-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00494-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00495-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00496-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00497-ADA

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF 

EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s First Amended Scheduling Order, Dkt. 45,1 Defendants hereby 

notify the Court that Defendants disclosed their extrinsic evidence to Plaintiff WSOU Investments, 

LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development via electronic mail on February 19, 2021.

1 There are 11 pending cases. Citations throughout refer to new WDTX Case Nos. -00487 through -00497, and 

specific citations reference to the docket for WDTX Case No. -00487.

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 56 Filed 02/19/21 Page 1 of 2
2

DATED: February 19, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

/s/Lionel M. Lavenue 

Lionel M. Lavenue 

Virginia Bar No. 49,005

lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

1875 Explorer Street, Suite 800

Reston, VA 20190

Phone: (571) 203-2700

Fax: (202) 408-4400

Attorney for Defendants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system on February 19, 2021.

/s/Lionel M. Lavenue 

 Lionel M. Lavenue

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 56 Filed 02/19/21 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

March 22, 2013

s0319

Order 

March 22, 2013

146490

KELLI SINTA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 146490

COA: 313868

Washtenaw CC: 12-001604-DC

MARTIN McDONALD,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 9, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.