51806 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Notices 

Nevertheless, the FAA notes potential 

pitfalls that could accompany the 

recommendations of the anonymous 

commenter. For example, the 

commenter’s definition of an aviation 

community user could include the flight 

department of a company that is 

interested in the aircraft movements of 

a competitor’s aircraft. This could 

presumably thwart a reason that the 

competing airspace user sought ASDI 

blocking in the first place. In addition, 

the FAA has not previously agreed that 

ASDI subscribers can display the 

historical movements of blocked 

aircraft. Aside from the absence of a 

clear line as to when such data becomes 

historical, the FAA did not propose to 

permit ASDI subscribers to retransmit 

the historical movements of blocked 

aircraft, and the commenter’s suggestion 

therefore falls outside the scope of the 

proposal. 

III. Conclusions 

With respect to the procedures for 

aircraft owner and operator requests to 

block and unblock aircraft from 

inclusion in the FAA’s ASDI data feed, 

the FAA concludes as follows: 

1. Requestors. The FAA will honor 

each written request of an aircraft owner 

and operator, submitted in accordance 

with paragraphs 2 and 3 to block or 

unblock their aircraft’s appearance in 

the FAA’s public ASDI data feed. 

Aircraft owners and operators may 

submit their request on their own 

behalf, or they may do so through a 

legally authorized agent, including an 

attorney or an aircraft management 

company with a fiduciary duty to carry 

out the owner’s or operator’s express 

wishes with respect to the aircraft. 

2. Substance of Requests. To assist the 

FAA in processing aircraft owner or 

operator requests promptly, all requests 

related to an aircraft’s ASDI blocking or 

unblocking must include the following 

information: 

• The name of the requestor; 

• the registration number(s) of the 

aircraft to be blocked or unblocked; 

• a certification that the requestor is 

the owner or operator of the specified 

aircraft or is a legally authorized 

representative of the aircraft owner or 

operator; 

• a telephone number or electronic 

mail address to which the FAA can 

direct any questions about the request; 

and 

• for a request to block one or more 

aircraft, a statement indicating the 

requestor’s desired level of ASDI 

blocking—either at the FAA source or at 

the ASDI subscriber level. 

3. Addresses. The FAA’s primary 

electronic mailbox for all aircraft 

blocking and unblocking requests and 

for related inquiries directed to the 

ASDI blocking program is ASDIBlock@

faa.gov. The FAA also will accept 

aircraft block and unblock requests 

submitted by regular mail at: FAA ASDI 

Blocking Request; ATO System 

Operation Services, AJR–0; Wilbur 

Wright Building, Room 3E1500; 600 

Independence Avenue SW; Washington, 

DC 20597. 

4. FAA Monthly Implementation. The 

FAA implements the ASDI block list 

updates on the first Thursday of each 

month. As a result, requests that the 

FAA receives on or before the 15th of 

the preceding month are likely to be 

processed in time to take effect in the 

month after the FAA receives them. 

However, it is possible that the volume 

of requests in a given month, a 

requestor’s timeliness, or issues with the 

completeness and accuracy of the 

information that the FAA receives could 

preclude the FAA from processing some 

requests in time for them to take effect 

in the month following their 

submission. In that event, the FAA will 

process all requests in the order in 

which the FAA receives them, to the 

extent that it is possible. 

5. FAA Treatment of Aircraft That Are 

Currently Blocked. Any aircraft that is 

currently on the ASDI block list, either 

by virtue of a certified security concern 

submitted after June 3, 2011, or a 

request submitted under the FAA’s 

interim ASDI block policy, will remain 

indefinitely on the ASDI block list when 

the policies in this document take effect. 

It is not necessary for the owners or 

operators of these aircraft to resubmit 

their requests, unless they wish to 

change the blocking status of their 

aircraft or amend the level at which 

their aircraft is blocked. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 14, 

2013. 

J. David Grizzle, 

Chief Operating Officer, ATO. 

[FR Doc. 2013–20375 Filed 8–20–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Requests for Comments; 

Clearance of Renewed Approval of 

Information Collection: Certification 

and Operations 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 

invites public comments about our 

intention to request the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

approval to renew an information 

collection. 14 CFR part 125 prescribes 

requirements for issuing operating 

certificates and for appropriate 

operating rules. In addition to the 

statutory basis, the collection of this 

information is necessary to issue, 

reissue, or amend applicant’s operating 

certificates and operations 

specifications. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

submitted by October 21, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kathy DePaepe at (405) 954–9362, or by 

email at: Kathy.DePaepe@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 2120–0085. 

Title: Certification and Operations. 

Form Numbers: There are no FAA 

forms associated with this collection. 

Type of Review: Renewal of an 

information collection. 

Background: 14 CFR part 125 

prescribes requirements for leased 

aircraft, aviation service firms, and air 

travel. A letter of application and 

related documents which set forth an 

applicant’s ability to conduct operations 

in compliance with the provisions of 14 

CFR part 125 are submitted to the 

appropriate Flight Standards District 

Office (FSDO). Inspectors in FAA 

FSDO’s review the submitted 

information to determine certificate 

eligibility. 

Respondents: Approximately 163 

certificated operators. 

Frequency: Information is collected 

on occasion. 

Estimated Average Burden per 

Response: 1.33 hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 

61,388 hours. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA 

at the following address: Ms. Kathy 

DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation 

Administration, AES–200, 6500 S 

MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 

73169. 

Public Comments Invited: You are 

asked to comment on any aspect of this 

information collection, including (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for FAA’s 

performance; (b) the accuracy of the 

estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to 

enhance the quality, utility and clarity 

of the information collection; and (d) 

ways that the burden could be 

minimized without reducing the quality 

of the collected information. The agency 

will summarize and/or include your 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Notices 51807 

comments in the request for OMB’s 

clearance of this information collection. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 14, 

2013. 

Albert R. Spence, 

FAA Assistant Information Collection 

Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business 

Services Division, AES–200. 

[FR Doc. 2013–20372 Filed 8–20–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Requests for Comments; 

Clearance of Renewed Approval of 

Information Collection: Airports Grants 

Program 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 

invites public comments about our 

intention to request the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

approval to renew an information 

collection. The FAA collects 

information from airport sponsors and 

planning agencies in order to administer 

the Airports Grants Program. Data is 

used to determine eligibility, ensure 

proper use of Federal Funds, and ensure 

project accomplishment. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

submitted by October 21, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kathy DePaepe at (405) 954–9362, or by 

email at: Kathy.A.DePaepe@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 2120–0569. 

Title: Airports Grants Program. 

Form Numbers: FAA forms 5100–100, 

5100–101, 5100–108, 5100–125, 5100– 

126, and 5370–1. 

Type of Review: Renewal of an 

information collection. 

Background: Codification of Certain 

U.S. Transportation Laws at 49 U.S.C. 

(Pub. L. 103–272), which is referred to 

as the ‘‘Act,’’ provides funding for 

airport planning and development 

projects at airports included in the 

National Plan of Integrated Airport 

Systems. The Act also authorizes funds 

for noise compatibility planning and to 

carry out noise compatibility programs. 

The information required by this 

program is necessary to protect the 

Federal interest in safety, efficiency, and 

utility of the Airport. Data is collected 

to meet report requirements of 49 CFR 

part 18 for financial management and 

performance monitoring. Information is 

collected in the application, and grant 

agreement amendments; financial 

management; and performance 

reporting. 

Respondents: Approximately 1,950 

sponsors and planning agencies for 

grant projects. 

Frequency: Information is collected 

on occasion. 

Estimated Average Burden per 

Response: 6.75 hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 

80,569 hours. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA 

at the following address: Ms. Kathy 

DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation 

Administration, AES–200, 6500 S. 

MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 

73169. 

Public Comments Invited: You are 

asked to comment on any aspect of this 

information collection, including (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for FAA’s 

performance; (b) the accuracy of the 

estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to 

enhance the quality, utility and clarity 

of the information collection; and (d) 

ways that the burden could be 

minimized without reducing the quality 

of the collected information. The agency 

will summarize and/or include your 

comments in the request for OMB’s 

clearance of this information collection. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 14, 

2013. 

Albert R. Spence, 

FAA Assistant Information Collection 

Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business 

Services Division, AES–200. 

[FR Doc. 2013–20369 Filed 8–20–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Requests for Comments; 

Clearance of Renewed Approval of 

Information Collection: Experimental 

Permits for Reusable Suborbital 

Rockets 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 

invites public comments about our 

intention to request the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

approval to renew an information 

collection. The FAA collects 

information from applicants for 

experimental permits in order to 

determine whether they satisfy the 

requirements for obtaining an 

experimental permit under 14 CFR part 

437. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

submitted by October 21, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kathy DePaepe at (405) 954–9362, or by 

email at: Kathy.DePaepe@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 2120–0722. 

Title: Experimental Permits for 

Reusable Suborbital Rockets. 

Form Numbers: There are no FAA 

forms associated with this collection. 

Type of Review: Renewal of an 

information collection. 

Background: 14 CFR part 437 

established requirements for the FAA’s 

authority to issue experimental permits 

for reusable suborbital rockets to 

authorize launches for the purpose of 

research and development, crew 

training and showing compliance with 

the regulations. The information 

collected includes data required for 

performing a safety review, which 

includes a technical assessment to 

determine if the applicant can launch a 

reusable suborbital rocket without 

jeopardizing public health and safety 

and the safety of property. This 

information collection requirement is 

intended for incorporating acquired data 

into the experimental permit, which 

then becomes binding on the launch or 

reentry operator. The applicant is 

required to submit information that 

enables FAA to determine, before 

issuing a permit, if issuance of the 

experimental permit would jeopardize 

the foreign policy or national security 

interests of the U.S. 

Respondents: Approximately 10 

applicants for experimental permits. 

Frequency: Information is collected 

on occasion. 

Estimated Average Burden per 

Response: 18.6 hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden: An 

estimated 2,567 hours annually. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA 

at the following address: Ms. Kathy 

DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation 

Administration, AES–200, 6500 S. 

MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 

73169. 

Public Comments Invited: You are 

asked to comment on any aspect of this 

information collection, including (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for FAA’s 

performance; (b) the accuracy of the 

estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to 

enhance the quality, utility and clarity 

of the information collection; and (d) 

ways that the burden could be 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES