### 1596 VOLUME 115 | NUMBER 11 | November 2007 • Environmental Health Perspectives 

# Research

Concern about exposure of the ecosystem, including humans, to halogenated persistentorganic pollutants (POPs) has existed for several decades. Many of these chemicals are persistent and toxic, tend to bioaccumulate, andcan undergo long range atmospheric transport; for these reasons, their production has been banned or reduced worldwide, leading
to their decreased concentrations in theecosystem. In addition, adherence to provisions set forth in the Stockholm Convention on POPs for 12 organochlorine chemicals (United Nations Environment Programme 2004) probably will result in continued decreasing environmental concentrations. More recently, the focus of environmental and public health concern has shifted from
chlorinated chemicals to brominated and
fluorinated chemicals. Among the fluorinated chemicals, the polyfluoroalkyl chemicals (PFCs) have beenused extensively since the 1950s in commercial applications, including surfactants, lubricants, paper and textile coatings, polishes, food packaging, and fire-retarding foams.Some of these PFCs, including perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), persist in humans and
the environment and have been detected worldwide in wildlife (Houde et al. 2006 and references therein). Exposure to PFOS andPFOA in the general population also is widespread, although demographic, geographic, and temporal differences may exist (Calafat et al. 2006b, 2007; Fromme et al. 2007; Guruge et al. 2005; Hansen et al. 2001; Harada et al. 2007; Kannan et al. 2004; Karrman et al. 2006; Olsen et al. 2005; Taniyasu et al. 2003; Yeung et al. 2006).
No definite association has been established between exposure to PFOS and PFOAand adverse health effects in several occupational studies (Alexander et al. 2003; Gilliland and Mandel 1993; Grice et al. 2007; Olsen et al. 2004a) and in one population exposed to PFOA through contaminated drinkingwater (Emmett et al. 2006). Negative associations between cord serum concentrations of both PFOS and PFOA and birth weight and ponderal index, but not newborn length or gestational age, have been reported in a nonoccupational population (Apelberg et al. 2007). By contrast, no association has been reported between employment in jobs with high exposure to PFOS before the end of pregnancy and maternally reported birthweight (Grice et al. 2007). In animals, exposure to PFOS and PFOA is associated with adverse health effects (Kennedy et al. 2004; Lau et al. 2004; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2002) albeit at serum concentrations orders of magnitude higher than the concentrations observed in the general population (Butenhoff et al. 2004; Luebker et al. 2005). Because of these compounds’ known toxicity to animals, their ubiquitous presence, and their persistence in humans, wildlife, and the environment, PFCsresearch is of interest to toxicologists, epidemiologists, and environmental and public
health scientists. Biomonitoring data for these PFCs in thegeneral population are needed to assess current exposures and to determine whether technologic changes affect human exposuresto these compounds. As part of the continuous U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), urine and serum samples are collected and analyzed for selected environmental chemicals [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2005]. NHANES participants also provide sociodemographic information and medical history and undergo standardized physical examinations (CDC 2003). We recently reported the concentrations of PFOS, PFOA, and nine other PFCs in 1,562 participants from NHANES 1999–2000 (Calafat et al. 2007). The high frequency of detection of PFOS and PFOA suggested highly prevalent exposures to these compounds at a time when both were being manufactured in the United States. In 2002, the 3M Company (St. Paul,MN), the sole U.S. producer of PFOS, discontinued its production of PFOS and related perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride

Address correspondence to A.M. Calafat, Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, NE, Mailstop F53, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. Telephone: (770) 488- 7891. Fax: (770) 488-4371. E-mail: Acalafat@cdc.gov

Supplemental Material is available online at http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2007/10598/suppl.pdf

The authors thank J. Pirkle for useful discussions, and J. Tully, K. Kato, A. Wanigatunga, and J. Ekong for technical assistance.

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent
the views of the Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention.

The authors declare they have no competing
financial interests.

Received 25 June 2007; accepted 29 August 2007. 

## Polyfluoroalkyl Chemicals in the U.S. Population: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2004 and Comparisons with NHANES 1999–2000

Antonia M. Calafat, Lee-Yang Wong, Zsuzsanna Kuklenyik, John A. Reidy, and Larry L. Needham

**Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA** 

BACKGROUND : Polyfluoroalkyl chemicals (PFCs) have been used since the 1950s in numerous commercial applications. Exposure of the general U.S. population to PFCs is widespread. Since 2002, the manufacturing practices for PFCs in the United States have changed considerably.

O BJECTIVES: We aimed to assess exposure to perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and eight other PFCs in a representative 2003–2004 sample of the general U.S. population ≥ 12 years of age and to determine whether serum concentrations have changed since the 1999–2000 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

METHODS: By using automated solid-phase extraction coupled to isotope dilution–high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, we analyzed 2,094 serum samples collected from NHANES 2003–2004 participants.

R

ESULTS: We detected PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFNA in > 98% of the samples. Concentrationsdiffered by race/ethnicity and sex. Geometric mean concentrations were significantly lower (approximately 32% for PFOS, 25% for PFOA, 10% for PFHxS) and higher (100%, PFNA) than the concentrations reported in NHANES 1999–2000 ( p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: In the general U.S. population in 2003–2004, PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFNA serum concentrations were measurable in each demographic population group studied. Geometric mean concentrations of PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS in 2003–2004 were lower than in 1999–2000. The apparent reductions in concentrations of PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS most likely are related to discontinuation in 2002 of industrial production by electrochemical fluorination of PFOS and related perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride compounds.

KEY WORDS : biomonitoring, C8, exposure, PFCs, PFOA, PFOS, prevalence, serum. Environ Health Perspect 115:1596–1602 (2007). doi:10.1289/ehp.10598 available via http://dx.doi.org/ [Online 29 August 2007](POSF)–based chemistries by electrochemical fluorination. Although PFOA and its saltsand precursors still are manufactured by others by a different process, reductions in their manufacturing emissions have been proposed [Prevedouros et al. 2006; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2006]. We now report the serum concentrations of 12 PFCs,including PFOS and PFOA, in 2,094 participants from NHANES 2003–2004 and compare these data with data from NHANES 1999–2000 (Calafat et al. 2007). The 2003–2004 data provide the first estimates of serum PFC concentrations in a representative U.S. population since implementation of the changes in manufacturing practices for some
PFCs in the United States.



### Materials and Methods
We obtained serum samples analyzed for PFCs from 2,094 participants ≥ 12 years of age from NHANES 2003–2004. The
National Centers for Health Statistics
Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved the study protocol. All participants provided informed written consent; parents or guardians provided consent for participants < 18 years of age (CDC 2006a). We measured perfluorooctane sulfonamide (PFOSA), 2-(N-ethyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetic acid (Et-PFOSA-AcOH), 2-(N

methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetic acid (Me-PFOSA-AcOH), perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBuS), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), PFOS, PFOA, perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDeA),perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUA), and perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) in 1 mL of serum, using a modification of the method ofKuklenyik et al. (2004), which involved automated solid-phase extraction coupled toreversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. We
used 18O2-PFOS (for all sulfonic acids and all amides) and 13 C2-PFOA (for all carboxylic acids) for quantification. To compensate for the lack of isotope-labeled internal standards for the other analytes and to partially account for matrix effects, the calibration standards were spiked into calf serum. The limits of detection (LODs) ranged from 0.1 to 1.0 μg/L; the accuracy ranged from 84 to 135% at three concentrations (Kuklenyik et al. 2004); and the precision ranged from around 10 to 26% at two different levels (Table 1). Low-concentration (~ 3 μg/L to ~ 9 μg/L) and high-concentration (~ 10 μg/L to ~ 30 μg/L) quality-control (QC) materials, prepared from a base calf serum pool, were analyzed with reagent blank, serum blank, and NHANES samples (Kuklenyik et al. 2004). Standard, blank, QC, and NHANES samples were analyzed by the procedure described above. We analyzed the data using SAS (version 9.1.3; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and SUDAAN (version 9.0.1; Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC).
SUDAAN calculates variance estimates after incorporating the sample population weights,designed for the one-third subset of the full survey, which account for unequal selection probabilities and planned oversampling of certainsubgroups resulting from the complex multistage area probability design of NHANES.Race/ethnicity was defined on the basis of selfreported data as non-Hispanic black, nonHispanic white, and Mexican American. Persons not defined by these groups were included only in the total population estimate. Age was reported in years at the most recentbirthday. We estimated the weighted percentage of detection and calculated weighted geometric means and percentiles for the serum concentrations (in micrograms per liter) of the
various PFCs. For concentrations below the LOD, as recommended for the analysis of NHANES data (CDC 2006b), we used a value equal to the LOD divided by the square root of 2 (Hornung and Reed 1990). Parametric statistics were computed only for analytes for which the frequency of detection was ≥ 60%. Because PFC concentrations were not normallydistributed, we used the natural log transformation. Weighted Pearson correlation coefficients
and related p- values were calculated in SAS. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. We used analysis of covariance to examinethe influence of demographic and socioeconomic variables on the log-transformed serum concentrations of PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFNA. For multiple regression, we calculated the least square geometric means (LSGM) and compared them for each categorical variable.
The variables included in the initial model were as follows: age as a continuous variable, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking status (yes/no), and education (less than high school, high school diploma, more than high school). Participantswere categorized as smokers if their serum cotinine concentrations were > 10 μg/L. We chose
to include education in the model without household income to minimize the possibility of collinearity because a ) income and education are strongly associated (chi-square p = 0.001) and b) the final model yielded comparable results with either variable separately (except forPFOS, which included one additional significant term between income and smoking status). We assessed all possible two-way interaction
terms in the model. To reach the final reduced model, we
used backward elimination with a threshold
of p < 0.05 for retaining the variable in the model, using Satterwaite adjusted F statistics. We evaluated for potential confounding by adding each of the excluded variables backinto the final model one by one and examining changes in the β coefficients of the statistically significant main effect. If addition of
one of these excluded variables caused a change in a β coefficient by ≥ 10%, the variable was re-added to the model.



### Results

The distribution of PFC serum concentrations is reported stratified by age, sex, and race/ethnicity (Tables 2–5). Four analytes were detected in > 98% of the samples (PFOS, 99.9%; PFOA, 99.7%; PFHxS, 98.3%; PFNA, 98.8%). Concentrations of these four PFCs ranged from < 0.4 μg/L to 435 μg/L (PFOS), < 0.1 μg/L to 77.2 μg/L (PFOA), < 0.3 μg/L to 82.0 μg/L (PFHxS), and < 0.1 μg/L to 11.5 μg/L (PFNA). Sixother analytes were detected at lower frequencies: PFDeA (31.3%), Me-PFOSA-AcOH (27.5%), PFOSA (22.2%), PFUA (9.7%), Polyfluoroalkyl chemicals in the United States in 2003–2004

Environmental Health Perspectives • VOLUME 115 | NUMBER 11 | November 2007 

### 1597 Table 1. LOD and precision data for the 12 polyfluoroalkyl compounds included in this study and a comparison of these parameters to the previously reported data for NHANES 1999-2000

.
Precision a LOD (μg/L) b QCL QCH
NHANES NHANES NHANES NHANES NHANES NHANES Analyte 2003–2004 1999–2000 2003–2004 1999–2000 2003–2004 1999–2000

PFOSA 0.2 0.05 2.7 (14.9) 2.4 (14.1) 13.0 (16.3) 12.4 (12.5) Me-PFOSA-AcOH 0.6 0.2 3.4 (15.5) 3.1 (14.2) 9.1 (16.7) 9.0 (13.5) Et-PFOSA-AcOH 0.4 0.2 3.8 (17.2) 3.5 (14.3) 8.3 (19.2) 8.1 (15.6) PFBuS 0.4 ND 4.4 (18.2) ND 14.6 (15.1) ND PFHxS 0.3 0.1 2.5 (16.4) 2.1 (16.6) 11.9 (12.9) 11.2 (12.3) PFOS 0.4 0.2 8.9 (10.4) 8.8 (8.4) 31.4 (10.1) 31.6 (7.1) PFHpA 0.3 0.4 7.6 (17.0) 6.8 (13.5) 15.8 (14.3) 15.5 (12.0) PFOA 0.1 0.1 3.2 (10.0) 3.1 (8.5) 14.7 (10.9) 15.1 (7.3) PFNA 0.1 0.1 2.5 (15.0) 2.6 (15.4) 12.7 (13.2) 13.0 (10.9) PFDeA 0.3 0.2 2.4 (17.5) 2.2 (13.9) 8.5 (18.2) 8.4 (13.1) PFUA 0.3 0.2 1.9 (22.0) 2.0 (19.1) 9.9 (19.8) 10.6 (16.2) PFDoA 1.0 0.2 2.2 (25.6) 2.4 (22.4) 8.5 (25.7) 9.1 (19.3)

ND, not determined.

aMean concentration (% coefficient of variation) of repeated measurements (minimum of 20) over time of quality-control calf serum materials of low (QCL) and high (QCH) concentrations. b The NHANES 1999–2000 samples were analyzed by using the approach described in Kuklenyik et al. (2005), whereas the NHANES 2003–2004 samples were analyzed by using the Kuklenyik et al. (2004) approach.PFHpA (6.2%), and Et-PFOSA-AcOH, (3.4%); their geometric mean and selected percentile concentrations are given as Supplemental Material in Tables S1–S6 (online at http://www.ehponline.org/docs/ 2007/10598/suppl.pdf). For the two analytes detected in < 1% of the samples (PFDoA,< 0.1%; PFBuS, 0.4%), we could not calculate the 95th percentile of concentrations. Statistically significant correlations ( p < 0.001) existed between the log-transformed concentrations of PFOS and PFOA (Pearson
correlation coefficient r = 0.66), PFHxS ( r = 0.56), and PFNA ( r = 0.50); between PFOA and PFHxS ( r = 0.46) and PFNA ( r = 0.55); and between PFHxS and PFNA ( r = 0.17). The final models included sex ( p < 0.01), age, race/ethnicity, and age-by-race/ethnicity interaction ( p = 0.01) for PFOS; sex, race/ ethnicity, age, education, sex-by-age ( p < 0.01), sex-by-race/ethnicity ( p = 0.03), and education-by-age ( p = 0.04) interactions for PFOA; sex, race/ethnicity ( p = 0.01), age, and sex-by-age interaction ( p = 0.02) for PFHxS; and sex ( p < 0.01), race/ethnicity, age, education ( p = 0.02), smoking status ( p = 0.02), and race/ethnicity-by-age (p < 0.01) and Calafat et al.



### 1598 VOLUME 115 | NUMBER 11 | November 2007 • Environmental Health Perspectives Table 2. Geometric mean and selected percentiles (95% confidence intervals) of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) concentrations in serum ( μg/L) for the U.S. population 12 years of age and older: data from NHANES 2003–2004.

Variable Geometric mean 10th percentile 25th percentile 50th percentile 75th percentile 90th percentile 95th percentile No.

All 20.7 (19.2–22.3) 9.8 (9.0–10.8) 14.6 (13.8–15.2) 21.1 (19.8–22.4) 29.9 (27.5–32.8) 41.2 (35.5–48.9) 54.6 (44.0–65.9) 2,094 12–19 years 19.3 (17.5–21.4) 9.9 (9.5–10.9) 14.4 (12.5–15.7) 19.9 (17.6–21.9) 27.1 (23.6–30.2) 36.5 (28.6–45.6) 42.2 (35.1–52.1) 640 20–39 years 18.7 (17.3–20.1) 8.9 (8.2–10.2) 12.6 (11.2–14.2) 18.7 (17.7–20.4) 27.4 (24.9–29.7) 36.9 (33.6–41.3) 44.3 (38.6–60.8) 490 40–59 years 22.0 (19.7–24.5) 10.6 (9.2–12.3) 15.3 (14.1–18.0) 22.2 (20.2–24.2) 32.2 (27.4–35.4) 43.8 (33.5–62.7) 61.5 (43.8–81.8) 387

≥ 60 years 23.2 (20.8–25.9) 9.9 (7.7–13.0) 16.6 (15.0–17.9) 23.9 (20.9–27.2) 34.7 (30.0–39.3) 50.3 (40.8–68.9) 69.4 (49.6–90.0) 577 Mexican American 14.7 (13.0–16.6) 7.4 (5.6–7.9) 10.3 (8.3–11.8) 15.9 (13.4–17.9) 21.1 (18.7–23.5) 28.1 (24.1–35.0) 35.5 (28.9–38.5) 485 Non-Hispanic black 21.6 (19.1–24.4) 9.9 (7.5–11.9) 14.8 (12.5–16.8) 22.0 (19.5–24.9) 32.2 (28.1–36.2) 43.8 (37.2–57.3) 57.5 (43.8–78.4) 538 Non-Hispanic white 21.4 (19.9–23.1) 10.5 (9.5–11.5) 15.0 (14.4–16.0) 21.9 (20.5–23.0) 30.2 (27.7–33.0) 41.3 (35.7–49.6) 55.9 (44.0–69. 4) 962 Female 18.4 (17.0–20.0) 9.0 (7.8–9.9) 12.4 (11.5–13.8) 18.2 (16.8–19.7) 27.3 (23.6–30.0) 39.7 (34.4–42.6) 45.7 (42.3–61.5) 1,041 Male 23.3 (21.1–25.6) 12.3 (10.4–13.5) 17.7 (15.9–18.9) 23.9 (22.3–25.3) 32.1 (28.7–35.7) 45.3 (35.5–62.7) 62.7 (43.8–81.8) 1,053

Table 3. Geometric mean and selected percentiles (95% confidence intervals) of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) concentrations in serum (μg/L) fo r the U.S. population 12 years of age and older: data from NHANES 2003–2004.

Variable Geometric mean 10th percentile 25th percentile 50th percentile 75th percentile 90th percentile 95th percentile No.

All 3.9 (3.6–4.3) 1.9 (1.8–2.1) 2.7 (2.6–3.0) 4.0 (3.8–4.4) 5.8 (5.2–6.3) 7.8 (6.7–9.6) 9.8 (7.4–14.1) 2,094 12–19 years 3.9 (3.5–4.4) 2.2 (1.9–2.3) 2.9 (2.6–3.2) 3.9 (3.3–4.4) 5.4 (4.6–6.1) 6.9 (5.6–9.2) 8.6 (5.9–12.6) 640 20–39 years 3.9 (3.6–4.2) 1.8 (1.5–2.1) 2.7 (2.5–3.0) 4.1 (3.7–4.5) 5.8 (5.4–6.1) 7.6 (7.3–8.4) 9.6 (8.4–11.1) 490 40–59 years 4.2 (3.8–4.8) 2.0 (1.8–2.4) 2.9 (2.6–3.2) 4.2 (3.9–4.8) 6.3 (5.3–7.2) 8.2 (6.8–10.7) 10.6 (7.4–16.9) 387

≥ 60 years 3.7 (3.3–4.1) 1.8 (1.5–2.1) 2.7 (2.4–2.9) 3.9 (3.5–4.3) 5.4 (4.9–5.9) 7.2 (6.0–9.5) 9.5 (6.9–14.1) 577 Mexican American 3.1 (2.8–3.4) 1.4 (1.1–1.8) 2.2 (1.9–2.5) 3.3 (3.0–3.6) 4.4 (4.1–5.1) 6.7 (5.7–7.3) 7.6 (6.7–10.5) 485 Non-Hispanic black 3.4 (3.0–3.8) 1.2 (1.1–1.6) 2.2 (1.9–2.5) 3.7 (3.1–4.2) 5.1 (4.4–6.1) 7.7 (5.3–10.9) 9.3 (6.5–13.9) 538 Non-Hispanic white 4.2 (3.9–4.5) 2.1 (2.0–2.3) 3.0 (2.6–3.2) 4.2 (3.9–4.6) 5.9 (5.4–6.6) 7.8 (7.2–9.1) 9.8 (7.6–13.3) 962 Female 3.5 (3.2–3.8) 1.6 (1.5–1.9) 2.5 (2.2–2.7) 3.6 (3.2–3.9) 5.2 (4.6–5.7) 7.1 (6.3–8.2) 8.4 (7.4–10.6) 1,041 Male 4.5 (4.1–4.9) 2.3 (2.0–2.4) 3.2 (3.1–3.5) 4.6 (4.2–5.0) 6.3 (5.6–7.1) 8.3 (6.8–11.8) 10.4 (7.4–17.5) 1,053

Table 4. Geometric mean and selected percentiles (95% confidence intervals) of perfluorohaxanesulfonate (PFHxS) concentrations in serum (μg/L) for the U.S. population 12 years of age and older: data from NHANES 2003–2004.

Variable Geometric mean 10th percentile 25th percentile 50th percentile 75th percentile 90th percentile 95th percentile No.

All 1.9 (1.7–2.2) 0.7 (0.6–0.7) 1.0 (0.9–1.2) 1.9 (1.6–2.1) 3.3 (2.8–3.9) 5.9 (4.8–7.2) 8.3 (7.1–9.7) 2,094 12–19 years 2.4 (2.1–2.9) 0.6 (0.5–0.8) 1.2 (1.0–1.4) 2.3 (1.7–3.0) 4.8 (3.9–6.0) 9.5 (6.8–12.5) 13.1 (9.9–19.6) 640 20–39 years 1.8 (1.6–2.0) 0.5 (0.5–0.6) 1.0 (0.9–1.2) 1.7 (1.5–2.0) 2.8 (2.5–3.3) 4.8 (3.9–6.1) 6.7 (4.9–9.4) 490 40–59 years 1.9 (1.6–2.2) 0.7 (0.5–0.8) 1.0 (0.9–1.2) 1.6 (1.4–2.0) 3.1 (2.3–4.5) 5.5 (4.3–6.9) 6.7 (5.5–8.2) 387

≥ 60 years 2.0 (1.7–2.4) 0.8 (0.5–0.9) 1.1 (1.0–1.3) 1.9 (1.6–2.1) 3.2 (2.6–3.7) 7.2 (4.3–9.7) 10.2 (7.0–12.6) 577 Mexican American 1.4 (1.2–1.7) 0.5 (0.3–0.7) 0.7 (0.5–0.9) 1.4 (1.2–1.7) 2.3 (1.9–2.7) 4.2 (3.1–5.1) 5.4 (4.0–8.9) 485 Non-Hispanic black 1.9 (1.6–2.3) 0.5 (0.3–0.7) 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 1.9 (1.5–2.2) 3.4 (2.7–4.3) 6.0 (5.0–7.1) 8.2 (6.3–12.0) 538 Non-Hispanic white 2.0 (1.8–2.3) 0.7 (0.6–0.8) 1.1 (1.0–1.3) 1.9 (1.6–2.1) 3.3 (2.8–4.0) 6.0 (4.6–7.8) 8.1 (6.9–10.1) 962 Female 1.7 (1.6–1.9) 0.6 (0.5–0.6) 0.9 (0.8–1.0) 1.5 (1.4–1.8) 2.9 (2.5–3.5) 5.8 (4.6–6.9) 8.2 (6.7–10.0) 1,041 Male 2.2 (1.9–2.5) 0.8 (0.7–1.0) 1.3 (1.1–1.4) 2.0 (1.8–2.4) 3.3 (2.8–4.4) 6.1 (4.6–8.1) 8.5 (6.4–10.5) 1,053

Table 5. Geometric mean and selected percentiles (95% confidence intervals) of perfluorononanoate (PFNA) concentrations in serum (μg/L) fo r the U.S. population 12 years of age and older: data from NHANES 2003–2004.

Variable Geometric mean 10th percentile 25th percentile 50th percentile 75th percentile 90th percentile 95th percentile No.

All 1.0 (0.8–1.1) 0.4 (0.3–0.4) 0.6 (0.5–0.6) 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 1.5 (1.2–1.7) 2.2 (1.6–3.8) 3.2 (1.8–7.7) 2,094 12–19 years 0.9 (0.7–1.0) 0.3 (0.3–0.4) 0.5 (0.5–0.6) 0.7 (0.6–0.9) 1.2 (0.9–1.5) 1.9 (1.2–3.3) 2.7 (1.3–6.3) 640 20–39 years 1.0 (0.8–1.1) 0.3 (0.2–0.5) 0.6 (0.6–0.7) 0.9 (0.8–1.1) 1.4 (1.2–1.7) 2.1 (1.7–2.7) 2.8 (1.9–6.1) 490 40–59 years 1.1 (0.9–1.4) 0.5 (0.4–0.5) 0.7 (0.6–0.7) 1.0 (0.9–1.2) 1.7 (1.2–2.4) 2.7 (1.6–5.9) 4.3 (1.7–9.3) 387

≥ 60 years 0.8 (0.7–1.0) 0.3 (0.2–0.3) 0.5 (0.5–0.6) 0.9 (0.8–1.0) 1.3 (1.1–1.5) 1.9 (1.5–3.0) 3.0 (1.6–6.5) 577 Mexican American 0.7 (0.6–0.8) 0.2 (0.1–0.2) 0.5 (0.4–0.5) 0.7 (0.5–0.8) 1.0 (0.9–1.3) 1.6 (1.2–1.8) 2.0 (1.6–2.8) 485 Non-Hispanic black 1.1 (0.8–1.5) 0.4 (0.3–0.6) 0.6 (0.5–0.8) 1.0 (0.8–1.4) 1.6 (1.2–2.7) 3.1 (1.5–6.5) 4.7 (2.1–9.3) 538 Non-Hispanic white 1.0 (0.8–1.1) 0.4 (0.3–0.4) 0.5 (0.5–0.6) 0.8 (0.8–0.9) 1.5 (1.2–1.7) 2.2 (1.6–3.4) 2.9 (1.8–6.2) 962 Female 0.9 (0.7–1.0) 0.4 (0.3–0.4) 0.6 (0.5–0.6) 0.9 (0.7–0.9) 1.2 (1.0–1.6) 2.2 (1.4–3.3) 3.0 (1.7–6.1) 1,041 Male 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 0.5 (0.4–0.5) 0.6 (0.6–0.7) 1.0 (0.9–1.2) 1.6 (1.3–1.8) 2.4 (1.7–4.8) 4.0 (1.8–8.7) 1,053Polyfluoroalkyl chemicals in the United States in 2003–2004

Environmental Health Perspectives • VOLUME 115 | NUMBER 11 | November 2007 

### 1599 age-by-smoking status ( p = 0.04) interactions for PFNA. Because of these interactions with age, concentrations were compared at the 25th (age = 26 years), 50th (age = 41 years), 75th (age = 55 years), and 90th (age = 70 years) percentiles of age. LSGM concentrations provide geometric mean estimates for a demographic variable after adjustment for the model covariates (Table 6). The statistical significance values when comparing these LSGM concentrations are shown in the Supplemental Material, Table S7 (online at http://www.ehponline. org/docs/2007/10598/suppl.pdf). PFOS LSGM concentrations were significantly higher ( p < 0.01) in males than in females. Similarly, for PFOA and PFHxS, males had significantly higher LSGM concentrations than females except at the 90th percentile of age (Table 6). LSGM concentrations of PFHxS were significantly lower for Mexican Americans than for non-Hispanic blacks ( p = 0.01) and non-Hispanic whites ( p < 0.01);LSGM concentrations did not differ significantly between non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks ( p = 0.49). PFOS andPFNA LSGM concentrations were significantly lower in Mexican Americans than in non-Hispanic blacks (PFOS, p < 0.01; PFNA,

p < 0.01–0.03) and non-Hispanic whites (PFOS, p < 0.01; PFNA, p < 0.01–0.02), regardless of age; LSGM concentrationsbetween non-Hispanic whites and nonHispanic blacks differed significantly only at the 75th and 90th percentiles of age (Table 6). Non-Hispanic whites had significantly higher PFOA LSGM concentrations (p < 0.01), regardless of sex, than Mexican
Americans. The differences between MexicanAmerican males and non-Hispanic black males and between non-Hispanic white malesand non-Hispanic black males were not statistically significant. We used a two-sample t -test to compare the difference of the two geometric mean concentrations (on the log scale) of PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFNA during NHANES 1999–2000 and NHANES 2003–2004 (Table 7), taking into account their associated standard errors and degrees of freedom, by age, sex, and race/ethnicity, using SAS. The differences were all statistically significant ( p < 0.05), except for PFHxS in Mexican Americans ( p = 0.21) (Table 7). We analyzed the NHANES 2003–2004 samples first and then the NHANES 1999–2000 samples (Calafat et al. 2007) using two methods that
differed in the manner in which PFCs were extracted and preconcentrated from the serum (Kuklenyik et al. 2004, 2005). In both methods, we used tandem mass spectrometry
with 18 O 2 -PFOS, 13 C 2 -PFOA, and 18 O 2 - PFOSA (only for NHANES 1999–2000) for quantification, the same multiple reaction monitoring transitions for quantification for PFOA (413/369) and PFOS (499/99), the same QC materials and analytical standards.

18O 2-PFOSA was not commercially available when the 2003–2004 NHANES samples were analyzed. Except for PFNA and PFOA, for which the LODs were the same regardless of the method, the method used for NHANES 1999–2000 (Kuklenyik et al. 2005) had slightly lower LODs than the method used for NHANES 2003–2004(Kuklenyik et al. 2004) (Table 1). To estimate whether method differences could account for the differences in concentrations, we analyzed QC samples from low and high concentration pools and 124 split samples using both methods. The two methods showed good agreement from the results of the split sample analysis [presented for PFOA in Figures S1 and S2 in Supplemental

Table 6. Least-square geometric mean concentrations (μg/L) (95% confidence intervals) of PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, and PFNA in various demographic groups.

Group PFOA PFOS PFHxS PFNA

Female 18.5 (17.1–20) 0.9 (0.7–1) Male 23.6 (21.8–25.7) 1.1 (0.9–1.3) Female: age P25 3.4 (3.1–3.7) 1.7 (1.5–1.9) Female: age P50 3.5 (3.3–3.8) 1.7 (1.5–1.9) Female: age P75 3.7 (3.4–4) 1.7 (1.5–2) Female :age P90 3.8 (3.4–4.2) 1.7 (1.5–2) Male: age P25 5.1 (4.7–5.5) 2.4 (2–2.8) Male: age P50 4.5 (4.2–4.9) 2.2 (1.9–2.6) Male: age P75 4.1 (3.7–4.5) 2.1 (1.8–2.4) Male: age P90 3.7 (3.2–4.2) 1.9 (1.6–2.3) MA 1.4 (1.1–1.7) NHB 1.9 (1.6–2.3) NHW 2.0 (1.8–2.3) Female, MA 2.6 (2.3–3) Female, NHB 2.8 (2.5–3.2) Female, NHW 3.8 (3.5–4.1) Male, MA 3.6 (3.3–3.9) Male, NHB 4.1 (3.5–4.8) Male, NHW 4.6 (4.2–5.1) MA: age P25 13.9 (12.5–15.5) 0.7 (0.6–0.8) MA: age P50 15.1 (13.6–16.8) 0.7 (0.6–0.8) MA: age P75 16.3 (14.4–18.4) 0.7 (0.5–0.8) MA: age P90 17.7 (15.3–20.6) 0.6 (0.5–0.8) NHW: age P25 20.1 (18.6–21.8) 1 (0.8–1.2) NHW: age P50 21.2 (19.6–22.9) 1 (0.8–1.1) NHW: age P75 22.3 (20.5–24.3) 0.9 (0.8–1.1) NHW: age P90 23.5 (21.3–26) 0.9 (0.8–1) NHB: age P25 19.9 (17.9–22.1) 1.1 (0.8–1.4) NHB: age P50 22.6 (20.1–25.5) 1.2 (0.9–1.6) NHB: age P75 25.5 (22.1–29.5) 1.3 (1–1.9) NHB: age P90 29.0 (24.3–34.7) 1.5 (1–2.1) NonSMK: age P25 1 (0.8–1.1) NonSMK: age P50 1 (0.8–1.1) NonSMK: age P75 1 (0.8–1.1) NonSMK: age P90 1 (0.8–1.2) SMK: age P25 1.1 (0.9–1.3) SMK: age P50 1 (0.8–1.1) SMK: age P75 0.9 (0.8–1) SMK: age P90 0.8 (0.7–1)
< HS 0.7 (0.6–0.8)
= HS 1 (0.8–1.1)
> HS 1.2 (0.9–1.7) < HS: age P25 3.7 (3.4–4.1) < HS: age P50 3.7 (3.4–4.1) < HS: age P75 3.7 (3.3–4.1) < HS: age P90 3.7 (3.3–4.2) = HS: age P25 4.4 (4.1–4.7) = HS: age P50 4 (3.7–4.3) = HS: age P75 3.7 (3.3–4.1) = HS: age P90 3.3 (2.8–4) > HS: age P25 4.2 (3.8–4.6) > HS: age P50 4.1 (3.7–4.5) > HS: age P75 4.1 (3.6–4.6) > HS: age P90 4 (3.4–4.7)

Abbreviations: HS, high school; MA, Mexican American; NHB, non-Hispanic black; NHW, non-Hispanic white; NonSMK, nonsmoker; P25, 25th percentile of age = 26 years; P50, 50th percentile of age = 41 years; P75, 75th percentile of age = 55 years; P90, 90th percentile of age = 70 years; SMK, smoker.Calafat et al.



### 1600 VOLUME 115 | NUMBER 11 | November 2007 • Environmental Health Perspectives Material (online at http://www.ehponline. org/docs/2007/10598/suppl.pdf)]. Results were similar for all other analytes (data not shown). In general, analysis of the QC pools
showed mean concentrations and coefficients
of variation which were similar between the two methods (Table 1).



### Discussion

We detected PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, andPFNA in > 98% of persons in this representative sample of the civilian, noninstitutionalized U.S. population, ≥ 12 years of age. Thesefindings confirm that measurable serum concentrations of these compounds were prevalent in the United States in 2003–2004, even after 3M in 2002 discontinued its industrial production of PFOS and related compounds, including the ammonium salt of PFOA.
Direct and indirect sources of PFOA still exist in the United States, although since 1999, global emissions of PFOA reportedly have decreased by more than half as of 2004(Prevedouros et al. 2006), and current producers have committed to reducing manufacturing emissions of PFOA and its salts and precursors (U.S. EPA 2006). Other PFCs, however, were detected infrequently. For example, PFBuS was detected in < 0.5% of the samples. PFBuS is afinal degradation product of perfluorobutanesulfonyl fluoride, now used in the manufacture of materials as a replacement for POSF-related chemicals [C-6 (e.g., PFHxS) and C-8 (e.g., PFOS)] that were phased out beginning in 2000. Similarly, in a study involving 18 volunteer employees from 3MCompany, PFBuS was detected only in workers with production-related duties, whereas PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS were detected in most workers (Ehresman et al. 2007). The lower frequency of detection of PFBuS than PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS suggests that human exposures to PFBuS are indeed lower, and/or that pharmacokinetic factors, which might include increased urinary elimination,
are different. PFOS showed the highest geometricmean and 95th percentile concentrations, followed by PFOA, PFHxS, and PFNA. For PFOS, PFOA, and PFNA, however—unlike lipophilic POPs whose serum concentrations increase with age (Needham et al. 2006)— concentrations were quite similar among the four age groups (Tables 2–5), a finding that agrees with previous data (Calafat et al. 2007;Olsen et al. 2003, 2004b, 2004c). By contrast, for PFHxS, the geometric mean and 95th percentile concentrations were higher for adolescents than for adults, as previously reported (Calafat et al. 2007; Olsen et al. 2004b). The higher concentrations of PFHxS
in children and adolescents could be related to their increased contact with carpeted floors containing PFHxS, which is used for specific postmarket carpet-treatment applications (Olsen et al. 2004b). In agreement with previous reports (Calafat et al. 2006a, 2007; Fromme et al. 2007; Harada et al. 2004; Midasch et al. 2006; Yeung et al. 2006), we observed sex andrace/ethnicity differences. Females had significantly lower LSGM concentrations of PFOS than did males (Table 6). For PFOA and PFHxS, sex differences also existed but were not as pronounced for the elderly (Table 6).
Mexican Americans had the lowest LSGM concentrations of PFHxS and non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks had similar concentrations (Table 6). Racial differences for PFOS and PFNA were age dependent, whereas those for PFOA were sex dependent (Table 6). These sex and racial differences may reflect variability in exposure patterns as a result of differences in factors such as lifestyle, diet, and use of products containing PFCs that may contribute to the observed serum
concentrations of PFCs.To evaluate whether the discontinued production of PFOS and related compounds by 3M Company in 2002 and technologic changes implemented by other companies have led to a subsequent decrease in serum PFC concentrations in the general U.S. population (Olsen et al. 2007b), we compared NHANES data of 1999–2000 with NHANES data of2003–2004. The distribution of serum concentrations of PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFNA by sex, race/ethnicity, and age in 2003–2004 (Tables 2–5) was similar to that for the general U.S. population in 1999–2000 (Calafat et al. 2007). However, the geometric mean concentrations for PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS in 2003–2004 were lower than for 1999–2000. For PFNA, 2003–2004 levels were higher than those found in 1999–2000. These concentrations differed significantly for all demographic groups except for PFHxS inMexican Americans (Table 7). Various concentration percentiles similarly decreased for PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS. We analyzed theNHANES 1999–2000 and 2003–2004 samples by using two different methods; however, these approaches provided equivalent results[Table 1; Figures S1 and S2 in the Supplemental Material (online at http://www. ehponline.org/docs/2007/10598/suppl.pdf)], indicating that the differences cannot be attributed to changes in the analyticalmethodology. The decrease in serum concentrations of PFOS and PFOA during this time interval agreed with the reported reductions in PFOS and PFOA concentrations for a group
of Red Cross blood donors in the UnitedStates (Olsen et al. 2007b) and in PFOS (temporal trends for PFOA were not examined) in Arctic ringed seals in the same time (Butt et al.2007). These decreases in serum concentrations of PFOS and PFOA in humans and wildlife had been related to the phaseout of POSF-based materials in 2000–2002 (Butt et al. 2007; Olsen et al. 2007b). For PFHxS, although the geometric mean concentrations were lower in 2003–2004 than in 1999–2000, the differences were less evident, and in some cases they reversed at the higher concentration percentiles for some demographic categories. These findings may
be related to the lower concentrations of
PFHxS than of PFOS or PFOA and to differences in the estimated geometric mean serum

Table 7. Geometric mean concentrations (95% confidence intervals) of PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, and PFNA in NHANES 1999–2000 and NHANES 2003–2004 for the whole population and different demographic groups. a

PFOS PFOA PFHxS PFNA
Variable 1999–2000 2003–2004 1999–2000 2003–2004 1999–2000 2003–2004 1999–2000 2003–2004

All 30.4 (27.1–33.9) 20.7 (19.2–22.3) 5.2 (4.7–5.7) 3.9 (3.6–4.3) 2.1 (1.9–2.4) 1.9 (1.7–2.2) 0.5 (0.5–0.7) 1.0 (0.8–1.1) 12–19 years 29.1 (26.2–32.4) 19.3 (17.5–21.4) 5.5 (5.0–6.0) 3.9 (3.5–4.4) 2.7 (2.1–3.4) 2.4 (2.1–2.9) 0.5 (0.4–0.5) 0.9 (0.7–1.0) 20–39 years 27.5 (24.9–30.2) 18.7 (17.3–20.1) 5.2 (4.7–5.7) 3.9 (3.6–4.2) 2.0 (1.7–2.3) 1.8 (1.6–2.0) 0.5 (0.4–0.6) 1.0 (0.8–1.1) 40–59 years 33.0 (28.0–38.8) 22.0 (19.7–24.5) 5.4 (4.7–6.2) 4.2 (3.8–4.8) 2.1 (1.8–2.3) 1.9 (1.6–2.2) 0.6 (0.4–0.7) 1.1 (0.9–1.4)

≥ 60 years 33.3 (28.5–38.8) 23.2 (20.8–25.9) 4.8 (4.3–5.5) 3.7 (3.3–4.1) 2.2 (1.9–2.5) 2.0 (1.7–2.4) 0.6 (0.5–0.8) 0.8 (0.7–1.0) Female 28.0 (24.6–31.8) 18.4 (17.0–20.0) 4.8 (4.3–5.3) 3.5 (3.2–3.8) 1.8 (1.6–2.1) 1.7 (1.6–1.9) 0.5 (0.4–0.6) 0.9 (0.7–1.0) Male 33.4 (29.6–37.6) 23.3 (21.1–25.6) 5.7 (5.2–6.3) 4.5 (4.1–4.9) 2.6 (2.3–3.0) 2.2 (1.9–2.5) 0.6 (0.5–0.7) 1.1 (0.9–1.3) Mexican American 22.7 (19.8–25.9) 14.7 (13.0–16.6) 3.9 (3.6–4.2) 3.1 (2.8–3.4) 1.5 (1.1–1.9) 1.4 (1.2–1.7) 0.3 (0.3–0.4) 0.7 (0.6–0.8) Non-Hispanic black 33.0 (26.2–41.6) 21.6 (19.1–24.4) 4.8 (4.1–5.6) 3.4 (3.0–3.8) 2.2 (1.6–2.9) 1.9 (1.6–2.3) 0.8 (0.6–1.0) 1.1 (0.8–1.5 ) Non-Hispanic white 32.0 (29.1–35.2) 21.4 (19.9–23.1) 5.6 (5.0–6.2) 4.2 (3.9–4.5) 2.3 (2.0–2.5) 2.0 (1.8–2.3) 0.6 (0.5–0.7) 1.0 (0.8–1.1 )

aFor PFOS, PFOA, and PFNA, all differences between NHANES 1999–2000 (Calafat et al. 2007) and NHANES 2003–2004 geometric mean con centrations are statistically significant ( p < 0.001). For PFHxS, except for Mexican Americans ( p = 0.209), all other differences are also statistically significant with p < 0.001, except for females ( p = 0.037), persons ≥ 60 years of age ( p = 0.016), persons 12–19 years of age ( p = 0.004), and non-Hispanic blacks ( p = 0.004).elimination half-life (PFHxS, 7.3 years; PFOA, 3.5 years; and PFOS, 4.8 years)(Olsen et al. 2007a). Furthermore, the correlation between the serum concentrations ofPFOS and PFOA was higher than correlations of PFHxS and either PFOA or PFOS,suggesting potential common exposure pathway(s) for PFOA and PFOS, but probablynot for PFHxS (mostly used in carpet-treatment applications (Olsen et al. 2004b). Pharmacokinetic factors may also contribute
to these differences. The transformation of
certain POFS-related sulfonamides to PFOS and potentially to PFOA in the atmosphere was suggested as a common mechanism for formation of both PFOS and PFOA, whichwould account at least partly for the high correlation in serum concentrations (Olsen et al. 2007b). On the other hand, PFOA and other perfluorocarboxylates (e.g., PFNA), but notPFOS, might be formed from the biodegradation of the volatile fluorotelomer alcohols (Ellis et al. 2004).Current manufacturing practices exclusively use fluorotelomers for the synthesis of perfluorocarboxylates (Prevedouros et al. 2006). Perfluorocarboxylates, including PFNA, were present as reaction by-products in POSF-based materials (Prevedouros et al. 2006). Interestingly, our data suggest that PFNA geometric mean concentrations in 2003–2004 approximately doubled over those of 1999–2000. However, because human exposure data for PFNA are more limited than they are for PFOS, PFOA, and even PFHxS, these results must be interpreted with caution. In 2004, the estimated annual production of the ammonium salt of PFNA, primarily used as a processing aid in the manufacture of such fluoropolymers as polyvinylidene fluoride, was 15–75 tonnes (Prevedouros et al. 2006).
Information about efforts to reduce manufacturing emissions for PFNA, estimated at about 10% of the amount produced, was not found (Prevedouros et al. 2006). As a comparison, global manufacturing emissions of PFOA were about 15 tonnes in 2004, down from about 45 tonnes in 1999 (Prevedouros et al. 2006). For most PFCs, these NHANES 2003–2004 results are consistent with reduced population exposure because of recent effortsof industry and government. U.S. and worldwide efforts continue in attempts to reduce exposures to PFCs, including PFOS andPFOA, and many halogenated POPs, including polybrominated diphenyl ethers. We will continue to assess exposure to these and other chemicals in the U.S. population through NHANES, an effort that will provide unique information on trends of exposure to these chemicals over time. In addition, we are analyzing pooled serum samples from 3- to 11-year-old children to fill data gaps for mean PFC concentrations in this age range. R EFERENCES

Alexander BH, Olsen GW, Burris JM, Mandel JH, Mandel JS.2003. Mortality of employees of a perfluorooctanesulphonyl fluoride manufacturing facility. Occup Environ Med

60:722–729. Apelberg BJ, Witter FR, Herbstman JB, Calafat AM, Halden RU,Needham LL et al. 2007. Cord serum concentrations of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in relation to weight and size at birth. Environ Health Perspect 115:1670–1676; doi:10.1289/ehp.10334 available via http://dx.doi.org/ [Online 31 July 2007]. Butenhoff JL, Kennedy GL, Frame SR, O’Connor JC, York RG.2004. The reproductive toxicology of ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO) in the rat. Toxicology 196:95–116. Butt CM, Muir DCG, Stirling I, Kwan M, Mabury SA. 2007. Rapidresponse of arctic ringed seals to changes in perfluoroalkyl production. Environ Sci Technol 41:42–49. Calafat AM, Kuklenyik Z, Caudill SP, Reidy JA, Needham LL. 2006a. Perfluorochemicals in pooled serum samples from
United States residents in 2001 and 2002. Environ Sci

Technol 40:2128–2134. Calafat AM, Kuklenyik Z, Reidy JA, Caudill SP, Tully JS,Needham LL. 2007. Serum concentrations of 11 polyfluoroalkyl compounds in the US population: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2000. Environ Sci Technol 41:2237–2242. Calafat AM, Needham LL, Kuklenyik Z, Reidy JA, Tully JS,Aguilar-Villalobos M, et al. 2006b. Perfluorinated chemicals in selected residents of the American continent. Chemosphere 63:490–496. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2003. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. National Center for Health Statistics. Available: http:// www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/intro_mec.htm [accessed 11 June 2007]. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2005.

NHANES 2003–2004 Public Data General Release File Documentation. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ data/nhanes/nhanes_03_04/general_data_release_doc_ 03-04.pdf [accessed 12 March 2007]. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2006a. Analytic and Reporting Guidelines. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_03_04/ nhanes_analytic_guidelines_dec_2005.pdf [accessed 12 March 2007]. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2006b. General Documentation on Laboratory Data. General Information about the NHANES 2003-2004 Laboratory Methodology and Public Data Files. Available: http:// www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_03_04/lab_c_ generaldoc.pdf [accessed 30 July 2007]. Ehresman DJ, Froehlich JW, Olsen GW, Chang SC, Butenhoff JL. 2007. Comparison of human whole blood, plasma, andserum matrices for the determination of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), and other

fluorochemicals. Environ Res 103:176–184. Ellis DA, Martin JW, De Silva AO, Mabury SA, Hurley MD,Sulbaek Andersen MP, et al. 2004. Degradation of fluorotelomer alcohols: a likely atmospheric source of perfluorinated carboxylic acids. Environ Sci Technol 38:3316–3321. Emmett EA, Zhang H, Shofer FS, Freeman D, Rodway NV, Desai C, et al. 2006. Community exposure to perfluorooctanoate: Relationships between serum levels and certain health parameters. J Occup Environ Med 48:771–779. Fromme H, Midasch O, Twardella D, Angerer J, Boehmer S, Liebl B. 2007. Occurrence of perfluorinated substances in an adult German population in southern Bavaria. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 80:313–319. Gilliland FD, Mandel JS. 1993. Mortality among employees of a perfluorooctanoic acid production plant. J Occup Environ

Med 35:950–954.Grice MM, Alexander BH, Hoffbeck R, Kampa DM. 2007. Selfreported medical conditions in perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride manufacturing workers. J Occup Environ Med

49:722–729. Guruge KS, Taniyasu S, Yamashita N, Wijeratna S, Mohotti KM,Seneviratne HR, et al. 2005. Perfluorinated organic compounds in human blood serum and seminal plasma: a study of urban and rural tea worker populations in Sri

Lanka. J Environ Monit 7:371–377. Hansen KJ, Clemen LA, Ellefson ME, Johnson HO. 2001. Compound-specific, quantitative characterization of organic: fluorochemicals in biological matrices. Environ
Sci Technol 35:766–770. Harada K, Koizumi A, Saito N, Inoue K, Yoshinaga T, Date C, et al. 2007. Historical and geographical aspects of theincreasing perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctane sulfonate contamination in human serum in Japan. Chemosphere 66:293–301. Harada K, Saito N, Inoue K, Yoshinaga T, Watanabe T, Sasaki S, et al. 2004. The influence of time, sex and geographicfactors on levels of perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoate in human serum over the last 25 years. J Occup Health 46:141–147.Hornung RW, Reed LD. 1990. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 5:46–51. Houde M, Martin JW, Letcher RJ, Solomon KR, Muir DCG. 2006. Biological monitoring of polyfluoroalkyl substances: a
review. Environ Sci Technol 40:3463–3473. Kannan K, Corsolini S, Falandysz J, Fillmann G, Kumar KS, Loganathan BG, et al. 2004. Perfluorooctanesulfonate and

related fluorochemicals in human blood from several
countries. Environ Sci Technol 38:4489–4495. Karrman A, Mueller JF, van Bavel B, Harden F, Toms LML, Lindstrom G. 2006. Levels of 12 perfluorinated chemicals in pooled Australian serum, collected 2002–2003, in relation to age, gender, and region. Environ Sci Technol

40:3742–3748. Kennedy GL, Butenhoff JL, Olsen GW, O’Connor JC, SeacatAM, Perkins RG, et al. 2004. The toxicology of perfluorooctanoate. Crit Rev Toxicol 34:351–384. Kuklenyik Z, Needham LL, Calafat AM. 2005. Measurement of 18 perfluorinated organic acids and amides in human serum using on-line solid-phase extraction. Anal Chem

77:6085–6091. Kuklenyik Z, Reich JA, Tully JS, Needham LL, Calafat AM. 2004. Automated solid-phase extraction and measurement of perfluorinated organic acids and amides in human serum
and milk. Environ Sci Technol 38:3698–3704.Lau C, Butenhoff JL, Rogers JM. 2004. The developmental toxicity of perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 198:231–241. Luebker DJ, York RG, Hansen KJ, Moore JA, Butenhoff JL.2005. Neonatal mortality from in utero exposure to perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) in Sprague-Dawley rats: Doseresponse, and biochemical and pharamacokinetic parameters. Toxicology 215:149–169. Midasch O, Schettgen T, Angerer J. 2006. Pilot study on theperfluorooctanesulfonate and perfluorooctanoate exposure of the German general population. Int J Hyg Environ

Health 209:489–496. Needham LL, Patterson DG Jr, Calafat AM, Sjodin A, Turner W,Kuklenyik Z. 2006. Distribution of halogenated environmental chemicals among people of different ages, races, and sexes in the United States. Organohalogen Compounds

68:484–487. Olsen GW, Burlew MM, Marshall JC, Burris JM, Mandel JH.2004a. Analysis of episodes of care in a perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride production facility. J Occup Environ Med

46:837–846. Olsen GW, Burris JM, Ehresman DJ, Froehlich JW, Seacat AM, Butenhoff JL, et al. 2007a. Half-life of serum elimination of perfluorooctanesulfonate, perfluorohexanesulfonate, and perfluorooctanoate in retired fluorochemical production workers. Environ Health Perspect 115:1298–1305. Olsen GW, Church TR, Hansen KJ, Burris JM, Butenhoff JL,Mandel JH, et al. 2004b. Quantitative evaluation of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and other fluorochemicals in

the serum of children. J Child Health 2:53–76. Olsen GW, Church TR, Larson EB, van Belle G, Lundberg JK,Hansen KJ, et al. 2004c. Serum concentrations of perfluorooctanesulfonate and other fluorochemicals in an elderly population from Seattle, Washington. Chemosphere

54:1599–1611. Olsen GW, Church TR, Miller JP, Burris JM, Hansen KJ, Lundberg JK, et al. 2003. Perfluorooctanesulfonate and
other fluorochemicals in the serum of American Red Cross adult blood donors. Environ Health Perspect 111:1892–1901. Olsen GW, Huang HY, Helzlsouer KJ, Hansen KJ, Butenhoff JL,Mandel JH. 2005. Historical comparison of perfluorooctanesulfonate, perfluorooctanoate, and other fluorochemicals in human blood. Environ Health Perspect 113:539–545. Olsen GW, Mair DC, Reagen WK, Ellefson ME, Ehresman DJ, Polyfluoroalkyl chemicals in the United States in 2003–2004

Environmental Health Perspectives • VOLUME 115 | NUMBER 11 | November 2007 

### 1601Butenhoff JL, et al. 2007b. Preliminary evidence of adecline in perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) concentrations in American Red Cross blood donors. Chemosphere 68:105–111. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2002. Co-Operation on Existing Chemicals. Hazard Assessment of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Its Salts. 1-362. Available: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/23/ 18/2382880.pdf [accessed 20 April 2007]. Prevedouros K, Cousins IT, Buck RC, Korzeniowski SH. 2006. Sources, fate and transport of perfluorocarboxylates.
Environ Sci Technol 40:32–44. Taniyasu S, Kannan K, Horii Y, Hanari N, Yamashita N. 2003. A survey of perfluorooctane sulfonate and related perfluorinated organic compounds in water, fish, birds, and humans from Japan. Environ Sci Technol 37:2634–2639. United Nations Environment Programme. 2004. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) [Press Release]. Available: http://www.pops.int/documents/ press/pr2-04SC.pdf [accessed 20 April 2007]. U.S. EPA. 2006. 2010/15 PFOA Stewardship Program. Available: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/pfoa/pubs/pfoastewardship.htm [accessed 20 April 2007]. Yeung LWY, So MK, Jiang GB, Taniyasu S, Yamashita N, SongMY, et al. 2006. Perfluorooctanesulfonate and related fluorochemicals in human blood samples from China. Environ
Sci Technol 40:715–720. Calafat et al.



### 1602 VOLUME 115 | NUMBER 11 | November 2007 • Environmental Health Perspectives