alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 30596 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,** 
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Eriston Wilson,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:19

- CR

- 34

- 3

**____________________ __________**  Before **Smith, Higginson,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****

Eriston Wilson challenges his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery and aiding and abetting the brandishing of a firearm during a crime of violence , in connection with his role in a string of robberies.

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 12, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-30596 Document: 54-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/12/2024No. 23

- 30596

2 We affirm the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, as the motion was not timely filed. See **Fed. R. Crim. P.**  33(b)(1). We also affirm the court’s application of U.S.S.G. § 1B1.2(d) because Wilson has failed to show that the court clearly er red by implicitly finding that it would have still convicted him of the object offenses of the Hobbs Act robbery conspiracy despite the alleged newly discovered evidence. See United States v. Lockhart , 844 F.3d 501, 513 (5th Cir. 2016). Finally, Wilson has not demonstrated that the district court abused its discretion in denying his request for a downward variance. See United States v. Douglas , 957 F.3d 602, 609 (5th Cir. 2020). His within

- guideline s sentence is presumptively reasonable, and he has not show n that the sentencing court failed to account for a factor that should have received significant weight, gave significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or made a clear error of judgme nt in weighing the sentencing factors. See i d.

**AFFIRMED**

. Case: 23-30596 Document: 54-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/12/2024
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 43369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18292]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7529]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Turkmenistan

    Pursuant to Section 7086(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. 
L. 111-117) as carried forward under the Department of Defense and 
Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 (Div. B, Pub. L. 112-10) 
(``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of Authority Number 
245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the national interest 
of the United States to waive the requirements of Section 7086(c)(1) of 
the Act with respect to Turkmenistan, and I hereby waive such 
restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published 
in the Federal Register.

     Dated: June 24, 2011.
 Thomas Nides,
 Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011-18292 Filed 7-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-46-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000,000
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            $    15
<SECURITIES>                                          129
<RECEIVABLES>                                         586
<ALLOWANCES>                                            3
<INVENTORY>                                            58
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      957
<PP&E>                                             13,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                      4,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     11,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 984
<BONDS>                                               557
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                            55
<COMMON>                                              167
<OTHER-SE>                                          6,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       11,626
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    3,161
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       2,262
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       60
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       815
<INCOME-TAX>                                          281
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   534
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                          534
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        

</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 52
[CA 030-EOC; FRL-6885-8]
 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
 ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.
 SUMMARY: EPA is extending the comment period for action proposed on September 18, 2000 (65 FR 56284).
 DATE: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by November 17, 2000.
 ADDRESSES: Mail comments to David Wampler, Permits Office (Air-3), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Wampler, Permits Office (Air-3), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 744-1256.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 18, 2000, EPA proposed the following revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). Local agency
Rule No.
Proposed actionBay Area AQMD
Regulation 1
Approval.Bay Area AQMD
Regulation 2, Rules 1, 2, and 4
Limited Approval/Disapproval.
 
 
 The proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. In response to a request from California Council for Environmental and Economic Balance submitted by telephone and in writing on September 28, 2000, EPA is extending the comment period for an additional 30 days. Dated: October 3, 2000. Felicia Marcus, Regional Administrator, Region IX.


[FR Doc. 00-26506 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### CUNNINGHAM v. STATE.

No. 25872.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 4, 1952.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of’ Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, 5 years.

Our able State’s Attorney has called our attention to two fatal defects in the indictment herein.

Judge Davidson, in Robinson v. State, 71 Tex.Cr.R. 561, 160 S.W. 456, 457, said:

> “It is a familiar rule laid down by the authorities that where the burglary is charged to have been committed with the intent to commit some specific crime — and it must be a felony or theft — the allegations of the crime intended to be committed, or actually committed, must be charged in all of its elements.”

The instant indictment charges that the burglary was committed with the intent to commit the crime of theft, yet it fails to give the name of the person from whose possession the property was taken, and further fails to allege the lack of consent of such person.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution dismissed.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2405

_____________________________

JOHNEKA JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Paul S. Bryan, Judge.

October 16, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Johneka Johnson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32(2)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of 7-Eleven, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward W. Moneypenny, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, , pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Edward W. MoneypennyEdward W. MoneypennySenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer7-Eleven, Inc.




Tab 7
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J UV ENI LE M ALE, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 07- 50538 D . C . N o . C R -0 7 -0 2 5 6 1 -T JW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia T hom a s J . W he l a n, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an d N . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. O s c a rF ., aju v e n ile m a le , ap p e a ls f r o m a n a d

ju d ic a tio n o f

ju v e n ile del i nq uency, i n v i ol at i on of 18 U . S . C . § 5 03 2, af t era f i nd i ng of gu i l tby the di stri ct c ourtf orm ul t i pl e vi ol a t i ons of 8 U . S . C . § 1324. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28



# FI LED OC T 05 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 50538 2 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e m a y a f f irm o n a n yg r o u n d s u p p o rte d b yth e r e c o r d , D i t tm an v. Ca lifo rn ia , 1 9 1 F. 3 d 1 0 2 0 , 1 0 2 7 n . 3 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 9 9 ) , a n d w e a f f i rm. O s c a rF . c ont e nds the di s tr i c tc ourtl a c ke d j ur i s di c t i on ove rhi m be c aus e the 18 U . S . C . § 5032 c e rt i f

i c a t i on w a s i na c c ur a t e . T he pa rt i e s do notdi s put e tha tthe s t a t e author i t i e s di d notpr os e c ut e O s c a rF . f orthe i ns t a ntof

f e ns e s . A de novo re vi ew of the re cord revea l s thatthe U ni t ed S t at es A tt orney a cc urat el y c ert i fi ed th a t “th e S ta te o f

C a lif o rn iad o e s n o t h a v e ju r is d ic tio n ” o v e rO s c a rF . See U ni ted S ta te s v . J

u v e n ile M

a le , 59 5 F . 3d 88 5, 89 1-95 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( concl ud i ng that w h e n th e ap p r o p r ia te s ta te p r o s e c u to rd e c id e s n o t to p r o s e c u te ap a rtic u la rju v e n ile f orthe s pe c i f

i c c r i m e a ti s s ue , the s t a t e c ourtne ve robt a i ns j ur i s di c t i on ove rthe ju v e n ile ) ; U

n ite d S ta te s v . M

a le J u v e n ile , 280 F . 3d 1008, 1014 ( 9th C i r . 2002) (s t at i ng st andard of revi ew ). A cc ordi ng l y, the di stri ctcourtprop er l y e xerc i se d j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e rO s c a rF. AF F I RME D.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 194 (Thursday, October 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25707]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

DATE & TIME: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and Title 
26, U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.


DATE & TIME: Thursday, October 12, 2000 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Dole for President--Statement of Reasons (LRA#467).
    Dole/Kemp '96, Inc.--Statement of Reasons (LRA#506).
    Advisory Opinion 2000-25: Minnesota House of Representatives 
Democratic Farmer Labor Caucus by counsel, Allan W. Weinblatt.
    Advisory Opinion 2000-26: Joel Deckard, Reform Party candidate, 
U.S. Senate, Florida.
    Administrative Matters:

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-25707 Filed 10-3-00; 1:29 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              209
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          233
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
                                               


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Explorations Group, Inc., (the
        "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2004
        as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        "Report"), I, Eric Brown, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
        of
        the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
        the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32, fully
                  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Registrant
 
 Date:
                May 31, 2007
              
              /s/ Eric
                BrownEric
                BrownChief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                Officer
   A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be
        retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
        Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 This
        certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates, is not
        deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
        incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities
        Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or
        after
        the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
        language contained in such filing.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

36 38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
DEPUTY 

RECEIVED

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BY:_______________________________ April 26, 2021 lad

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 46-1 Filed 04/20/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 46-1 Filed 04/20/21 Page 2 of 2
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-16-00108-CR

TIMOTHY EDWARD DEPAEPE APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 372ND DI STRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 1387145D

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- On March 15, 2016, Appe llant Timothy Edward De paepe signed and filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’ s April 17, 2015 judgment (or perhaps from the trial court’s May 18, 20 15 judgment nunc pro tunc). Although we have notified Appellant of our concer n that we lack jurisdiction over this

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 appeal because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, we have not received a
response. 2 Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 3 PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: June 16, 2016

2 See Tex. R. App. P. 25 .2(b), 26.2(a)(1).

3 See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Ohio Nonassociated Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Ohio Nonassociated Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 19     | 6      | 38     | 142   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 75     | 102    | 107    | 98     | 92     | 124    | 115    | 125    | 110    | 67    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 14     | 50     | 246    | 1,015  | 3,498  | 7,359  | 7,284  | 12,741 | 12,770 | 15,477
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 14,244 | 16,533 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023