alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BUMGUARDNER v. STATE (four cases).

Nos. 25049-25052.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 20, 1950.

On Rehearing March 14, 1951.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge,

Appellant was assessed a fine of $500 upon his conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area. ■ ;

The statement of facts fully supports the conviction. No question is raised on this appeal which requires our consideration.

The judgment is affirmed.

*310On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The record in the present instance contains the same defect and is subject to the same criticism as that discussed in the opinion on motion for 'rehearing this dáy delivered in Bumguardner v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 237 S.W.2d 308.

For the reasons stated in said opinion, the motion for a rehearing herein is granted, the order of affirmance heretofore entered is set aside, and this cause is now reversed and remanded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 61334)    
The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than October 31, 2000.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas**                     (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                

*1. Gene Allen Van Meter,*                     Beaumont, Texas; Barbara Van Meter, Beaumont, Texas; Gene Allen Van Meter, Jr. , Lumberton, Texas; and Gary Stephen Van Meter, Beaumont, Texas all to acquire additional voting shares of Lamar Bancshares, Inc., Beaumont, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Lamar Bank, Beaumont, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 11, 2000.

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 00-26542 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### In the Matter of Robert J. Podlas, Petitioner, and Gloria M. Wodarczak, Appellant, v Town of Cheektowaga et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Kane, J. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kane, J.—modify referendum.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Green, JJ. (Order entered Oct. 29, 1990.)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00474-CR

Godfrey A. Mark, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 55877, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s motion to withdraw notice of appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: February 22, 2005

Do Not Publish
Exhibit ‘I’

Subject to Protective Order. Provided to Court for in camera review pursuant to 

Order. 

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 118-9 Filed 11/04/22 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stone Container Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick J. Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/PATRICK J. MOOREPatrick J. Moore President
and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 12, 2003 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Stone Container Corporation and will be retained by Stone Container Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Standard Motor Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
J. Burke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/S/ JAMES J. BURKE
------------------------
James J. Burke
Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2008


* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Standard Motor Products, Inc. and will be retained by Standard Motor
Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
UNI T E D S T A T E S E N V IR O N M E N T A L P R O T E C T I O N A G E NC Y

R E G I O N I X

75 Ha w tho r n e S t r ee t

S a n F r a n ci s c o

, C A 9 4 10 5

January 25, 2012

M r

. R ob er t K ar d, A i r P o ll u ti on C on t r o l Off i ce r

S a n D i e g o C oun t y A i r P o ll u ti on C on t r o l D i s t r i c t

10124 O l d Gr ov e R o a d

S a n D i e g o, C A 9213 1

- 1 6 40

D ear M r

. K ar d :

Th a nk y o u f

o r y ou r sub m i ss i on o f t h e 2011 A m b i e n t A i r Mon it o r i n g N e t w o r k P l a n f o r S a n D i e g o

C oun t y

. W e h a v e r e v i e w e d t h e sub mitt e d do c u m e n t a nd h a v e f ound t h a t t h e p l a n i s c o m p l e t e

, i n f o r m a ti v e , d e t a il e d a n d m ee t s a ll o f t h e re qu i r e m e n t s f o r a nnu a l n e t w o r k p l a ns a s re qu i r e d b y o u r

r e g u l a ti ons s e t f

o r t h und e r

40 C F R P ar t 58.10. W h il e t h i s l e tt er s er v e s a s o ff

i c i a l a pp r o v a l o f t h e a n nu a l

n e t w o r k p l a n, it do e s no t c ons tit u t e a pp r ov a l o f t h e s y s t e m m od i f i ca ti ons t h a t are p r opos e d i n t h e p l a n

f o r t h e f u t u r e

. W e w ill c on ti nu e t o w o r k w it h y o u r d i s t r i c t t o re v i e w s y s t e m c h a n g e s a s t h e y p r o c ee d.

I f y ou h a v e a n y qu e s ti o n s r e g ar d i n g t h i s l e tt er , p l e a s e f e e l f r ee t o c on t a c t m e a t ( 415 ) 97 2

- 3851 o r

M ere d it h K u rp i us a t ( 41 5 ) 947

- 4534

.

S i n cere l y

,

/ s /

M a tt h e w L a k i n, M a n a g e r

A i r Q u a li t y A n a l y s i s Of

f i c e

A i r D i v i s i on

cc : M a h m ood H oss a i n, S a n D i e g o C oun t y A PC D

D a v i d S h i n a

, S a n D i e g o C oun t y A PC D

K are n M a g li a no, A R B
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**SKINNY
      NUTRITIONAL CORP.**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Skinny Nutritional Corp. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald J.
      McDonald, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
      that:





(1)
          The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company.




Date: April
                2, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Donald
                J. McDonaldDonald
                J. McDonaldChief
                Executive Officer




*This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
      date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
      contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.*
IN THE S UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22

- 0509

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ROBERT WINKOWITSCH

Appellee

,

- vs

GLACIER ELECTRIC

COOPERATIVE, I NC

. ,

Appellant

.

::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ORDER GRANTING MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR

FILING TRANSCRIPTS ON

APPEAL

Pursuant to the Appellant’s Rule 9(4) M.R.App.P. Motion for Extension of

Time for Filing Transcripts on Appeal, as accompanied by the Declaration of

Court Reporter Josie Loney setting forth in detail why the transcript has not been

provided and why the additional time sought is needed, and good cause

appearing, the Appellant and Court Reporter are given an extension of time until

March 1 , 2023, to serve and file the transcripts request on appeal herein.

DATED this day of January , 2023

.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 27 2023

01/27/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0509
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DARLENE M. BROUGHTON,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2014-3063

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. SF-0752-13-0101-I-1.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

The Department of the Veterans Affairs 

(“Department”) moves to reform the official caption to name 

the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) as the proper 

respondent, and to set the due date for the Board’s brief as 

21 days from the date of disposition of this motion.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The 

Case: 14-3063 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 03/12/2014
2 BROUGHTON v. MSPB

employing agency is designated as the respondent when the 

Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the 

Board dismissed Broughton’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for 

review.

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motions to reform the caption are granted. 

The revised official caption is reflected above. 

(2) The Board should calculate its brief due date from 

the date of filing of this order.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s21 

Case: 14-3063 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 03/12/2014
Exhibit  32


                              Certification
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
   and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of The  L.S. Starrett Company,  a Massachusetts
corporation  (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 25, 2004 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and  information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  February 3, 2005                     /s/ Douglas A. Starrett
	                                      Douglas A. Starrett
                                            Chief Executive Officer


Date:  February 3, 2005                     /s/ Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
                                            Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
                                            Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United  States Code) and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The L.S. Starrett Company and will be retained by The L.S.
Starrett Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Storage Technology Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert S.
Kocol, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Robert S. Kocol

Robert S. Kocol
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2002
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 2018

In re: RAYMOND C. MARSHALL , Petitioner

.

No. 19

- 2118

In re: RAYMOND C. MARSHALL,

Petitioner.

On Petition s for Writ s of Mandamus

. ( 5:18

- hc

- 02156

- FL )

Submitted : April 1, 2020 Decided: April 14, 2020

Before WILKINSON, AGEE , and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Petition s denied by unpublished per curiam opinion

.

Raymond C. Marshall , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Raymond C. Marshall petitions for writ s of mandamus seeking an order vacating
the transfer of his 28 U.S.C § 2254 (2018) petition, liberally constru ing the § 2254 petition
as a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion, and reduc ing his sentence to time served . We conclude

that Marshall is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) ; In re Murphy

Brown, LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018)

. Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795.
Here, the Eastern District of North Carolina transferred Marshall’s petition to the Middle

District of North Carolina in June 2018 , s ee 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d) (2018), and the Middle

District denied relief

. Because Marshall’s § 2254 petition is no longer pending in either

district court , th e relief sought by Marshall i s not available by way of mandamus. See In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007) (recognizing that m andamus

relief is not a substitute for appeal ). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition s for writ s of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION S DENIED
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 264 

To provide for semiannual actuarial studies of the FHA mortgage insurance 

program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development during 

periods that the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund does not meet minimum capital ratio requirements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2013 

Mr. LYNCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide for semiannual actuarial studies of the FHA 

mortgage insurance program of the Secretary of Housing 

and Urban Development during periods that the Mutual 

Mortgage Insurance Fund does not meet minimum capital ratio requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FHA Enhanced Over5 sight Act of 2013’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 264 IH

1 SEC. 2. SEMIANNUAL ACTUARIAL STUDIES OF MMIF DUR2 ING PERIODS OF CAPITAL DEPLETION. 

3 Paragraph (4) of section 202(a) of the National 

4 Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1708(a)(4)) is amended— 

5 (1) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘except as 

6 provided in subparagraph (B),’’ after ‘‘to be con7 ducted annually,’’; 

8 (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘, ex9 cept as provided in subparagraph (B),’’ after ‘‘annu10 ally’’; 

11 (3) by striking the paragraph designation and 

12 heading and all that follows through ‘‘The Secretary 

13 shall provide’’ and inserting the following: 

14 ‘‘(4) INDEPENDENT ACTUARIAL STUDY.— 

15 ‘‘(A) ANNUAL STUDY.—The Secretary 

16 shall provide’’; and 

17 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub18 paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(B) SEMIANNUAL STUDIES DURING PERI20 ODS OF CAPITAL DEPLETION.—During any pe21 riod that the Fund fails to maintain sufficient 

22 capital to comply with the capital ratio require23 ment under section 205(f)(2)— 

24 ‘‘(i) the independent study required by 

25 subparagraph (A) shall be conducted semi26 annually and shall analyze the financial poVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:49 Jan 16, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H264.IH H264

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HR 264 IH

1 sition of the Fund as of September 30 and 

2 March 31 of each fiscal year during such 

3 period; and 

4 ‘‘(ii) the Secretary shall submit a re5 port meeting the requirements of subpara6 graph (A) for each such semiannual 

7 study.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7941

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JAYLAR TASSMALL BYERS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

District Judge. (3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6) 

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009 

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Jaylar Tassmall Byers, Appellant Pro Se. Amy E. Ray, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Jaylar Tassmall Byers appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the 

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Byers, No. 

3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 2008). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3291] 

In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated September 26, 2000, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning on July 27, 2000 and continuing through September 26, 2000. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.,*                     the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is October 31, 2000 and for economic injury the deadline is June 1, 2001.                

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008)

Dated: September 29, 2000. 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 00-26245 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P