alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99b


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned, as chief financial officer of The L.S. Starrett
Company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's
knowledge:

1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
Roger U. Wellington, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer


Dated: May 9, 2003

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906
HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE L.S.STARRETT COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY
THE L.S.STARRETT COMPANY AND FURNISHED THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

ex99bruwcertDEC02amend.doc	-2-
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,935-01

EX PARTE ANDREW LOUIS CANTU, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 12-11-27040-A-1 IN THE 24TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM VICTORIA COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of unlawful delivery of controlled substance in penalty group 1 (>4

grams, but <200 grams), and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. Applicant’s sentence was

suspended and he was placed on community supervision for five years. Applicant’s community

supervision was later revoked and he was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth

Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Cantu v. State, No. 13-17-00360-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus

Christi-Edinburg, May 31, 2018)(not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application

for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this

Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that the State’s prosecuting attorneyat his original trial where he received
2

a suspended sentence and community supervision was the judge presiding over his revocation of that

community supervision and was therefore disqualified. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true,

might entitle him to relief. Tex. Const. art. V, § 11.5; Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. § 30.01; Whitehead

v. State, 273 S.W.3d 285, 286 n.3 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); Gresham v. State, 66 S.W. 845, 43 Tex.

Crim. 466, 467 (1902); January v. State, 38 S.W. 179, 36 Tex. Crim. 488, 491 (1896). Accordingly,

the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 

The trial court shall orderthe State to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record,

the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a

hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. SeeTEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the judge at

the revocation of Applicant’s community supervision was the prosecuting attorney at the original

plea hearing. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate

in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
3

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: February 26, 2020

Do not publish
San loaquin Valley TM

ArR P0ttuTt0t{ cflt{TRflt DtsTRtcT HEATTHY AIR LIVINGFebruary 4,2015

Mr. Mike Guzzetta, Manager

Rule Evaluation Section

California Air Resources Board

P.O. Box 2815

Sacramento, CA 95812

Dear Mr. Guzzetta

Attached is the Rule Action Package for Rule 4905 (Natural Gas-fired, Fan-Type

central Furnaces) adopted by the District's Governing Board on January 22,

2015. We request the California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit this rule

and the appropriate documentation to the United States Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) as a revision to the state lmplementation Plan.

lncluded in this Rule Action Package are the following:

ARB SIP Completeness Checklist

ARB APCD/AQMD Rule Evaluation Form

Clean copy of Rule 4905

Underline/Strikeout Copy of Rule 4905

Governing Board Resolution

Governing Board Memo

Evidence of Public Hearing

Final Staff Report with appendices

lf you have any questions, please contact Jesse Madsen at (559) 230-6100 or by

e-mail at Jesse.Madsen@valleyair.org. The District thanks you and your staff for

your assistance.

Sheraz Gill

Director of Strategies and lncentives

Attachments

Seyed Sadredin

Executive DirectolÂir Pollution Control 0lf icer

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

I

fllorthern Region

4800 Enterprise Way

Modesto, CA 95356.8718

TeL (2091 557.6400 FAX: (2091 557.6475

Central Region (Moin 0fficol

1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue

Fresno, CA 93726.0244

TeL 1559) 230.6000 FAX: (5591 230.6061

Southern legion

34946 Flyover Court

Bakerslield, CA 93308.9725

Tsh 681.392.5500 FAX: 661.302.5585

www.valleyair.org www.healthyairliving.com

Pinr.dddyclodp¡ps, Íl
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5312 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5312

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain screws, bolts, nuts, 
                washers, and similar articles of steel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain screws, bolts, nuts, 
                washers, and similar articles of steel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SCREWS, BOLTS, NUTS, WASHERS, AND SIMILAR ARTICLES 
              OF STEEL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Screws, bolts,      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          nuts, washers,                                                    12/31/2015
                          and similar
                          articles of steel
                          having shanks or
                          threads with a
                          diameter of less
                          than 6 mm
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          7318.15.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000093566
<NAME> STANSBURY HOLDINGS CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          59,112
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,112
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,890,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,831,421
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,890,491
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  398,509
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             197,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. Section 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report of American States Water Company and Southern California
Water Company (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Robert J. Sprowls,
Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Robert J. Sprowls Robert J. Sprowls
Senior Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary Date: May 10, 2005
# j ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23-0575
RIKKI HELD; LANDER B., by and through his guardian Sara Busse; BADGE B., by and through his guardian Sara Busse; SARIEL SANDOVAL; KIAN T., by and through his guardian Todd Tanner; GEORGIANNA FISCHER; KATHRYN GRACE GIBSON-SNYDER; EVA L., by and through her guardian Mark Lighthiser; MIKA K., by and through his guardian Rachel Kantor; OLIVIA VESOVICH; JEFFREY K., by and through his guardian Laura King; NATHANIEL K., by and through his guardian Laura King; CLAIRE VLASES; RUBY D., by and through her guardian Shane Doyle; LILIAN D., by and through her guardian Shane Doyle; TALEAH HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiffs and Appellees,
v. STA'1E OF MONTANA, GOVERNOR GREG GIANFORTE, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION, and MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Defendants and Appellants. ORDER 

# F%LEO IAA 2E1 2024

reenvv000 Clerk. of SuprCi eme Court state of is/Winter-1P

Andrew B. Cashmore, ofBoston, Massachusetts, has petitioned for permission to appear pro hac vice before this Court in the above-entitled cause. Havingreviewedthe applicationandhavingdeterminedthat,asrequiredbyourRules for Admission to the Bar ofMontana, Petitioner is currently in good standing with another statejurisdiction in which Petitioner is adrnitted to the practice of law, Montana counsel 03/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0575listed in the application is in good standing with the State Bar ofMontana, and this is the

first appearance ofPetitioner andthe first appearance ofPetitioner's firm undertheprohac vice rules, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application ofAndrew B. Cashmore to appear pro hac vice in the above-entitled cause is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to Andrew B. Cashmore, to all counsel ofrecord in this appeal, and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this 26th day ofMarch 2024. For the Court,
By
Exhibit 31.1

                                  Section 1350

                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Peter P. Smetek, Jr., certify that:

1.    I have reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-KSB of Larrea  BioSciences
      Corporation;

2.    Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this annual report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the  registrant  as of, and for,  the  periods  presented  in this  annual
      report.

4.    Larrea  BioSciences  Corporation's  other  certifying  officer  and  I are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      Larrea BioSciences Corporation and, have:

      a.    Have caused such  disclosure  controls and procedures to be designed
            under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating
            to Larrea  BioSciences  is made  known to us by others  within  this
            entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being
            prepared; and,

      b.    Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  Larrea  BioSciences'   disclosure
            controls and procedures  and present in this report our  conclusions
            about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,
            as of the end of the period covered by this report,  and the date of
            this report, based on such evaluation.

Date:  July 28, 2005                            /s/Peter P. Smetek, Jr.
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Peter P. Smetek, Jr.
                                                Chief Executive Officer
#### Rita A. Switzman et al., Respondents, *v.*Aperion Catering Corp. et al., Appellants, and Seaberg Elevator Co., Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

May 2, 1957.

*Frank Kreitzberg*for appellants.

*Sidney Siller*for plaintiffs-respondents.

*Robinson <& Gales*for defendant-respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

In view of the evidence introduced by plaintiffs to establish specific acts of negligence which caused their injuries, it was error to submit the case to the jury on the theory of *res ipsa loquitur (Bressler*v. *New York R. T. Corp.,*270 N. Y. 409; *Bailey v. Bethlehem Steel Co.,*277 App. Div. 798, affd. 302 N. Y. 717; *Goodheart*v. *American Airlines,*252 App. Div. 660).

The judgment, as amended, should be unanimously reversed upon the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with $30 costs to appellants to abide the event.

Pette, Hart, and Brown, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-04-00474- CR G odfr e y A . M ar k, A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee
F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF BELL CO UNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 55877 , HO NORAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESI DING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Appellan t ’s m o t ion to withdraw notice of appea l is gra

nted. SeeTe x. R. A

pp . P. 42.2(a) . The a

ppeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and Pember

ton Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: F ebrua

ry 22, 2005 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Exhibit 8**List of Subsidiaries of Viatel Holding (Bermuda) Limited** – VTL-TP (Bermuda) Limited (Bermuda)– Viatel Belgium NV (Belgium)– Viatel Opérations SA (France)– VTL, Inc. (U.S.) **•** Viatel Belgium Limited (UK)  **•** Viatel Circe Assets Limited (UK)  **•** VTL (UK) Limited (UK)    – Viatel Internet Limited– Viatel Broadband Limited (UK)– Viatel Holding (Europe) Limited (UK) **•** Viatel Equipment Limited (UK)  **•** VTL Telecom GmbH (UK)  **•** Viatel German Asset GmbH (Gemany)  **•** Viatel Global Communications BV (The Netherlands)    – Viafoperations Communications BV (The Netherlands)  **•** Viaphone AG  **•** VTL Wavenet Limited
Exhibit
99.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Storage Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Robert S. Kocol, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ ROBERT S. KOCOL 
Robert S. Kocol Chief Financial Officer May 8, 2003
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARESEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONSCUSIP 85917T 10 9THIS CERTIFIES THATis the
owner ofFULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.01 PAR VALUE, OFSTERLING CHECK CORP. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this
certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned COMMON and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers. Dated:TITLE TITLECOUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER TRUST&    COMPANY New(Brooklyn,    York) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE













 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were
written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: UTMA    Custodian TEN COM – as tenants in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT – as tenants by entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors JT TEN – as
joint tenants with right of survivorship Act and not as tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For    value received _____ hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto PLEASE
INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute
and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. X X NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE
CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS
MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT
ACCEPTABLE.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5479 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5479

  To suspend temporarily the duty on light emitting diode (LED) down 
                          light modules (DLM).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on light emitting diode (LED) down 
                          light modules (DLM).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) DOWN LIGHT MODULES (DLM).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Light emitting      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          diode (LED) down                                                  12/31/2015
                          light modules
                          (DLM) (provided
                          for in subheading
                          9405.40.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Storage Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 26, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Robert S. Kocol, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ ROBERT S. KOCOL 
Robert S. Kocol Chief Financial Officer November 7, 2003