alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CHASCO v. STATE.

No. 24632.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 1, 1950.

*448None on appeal for appellant.

William E. Clayton, Dist. Atty., El Paso, Rutledge Isaacks, Asst. Dist. Atty., El Paso, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Burglary is the offense; the punishment, four years in the penitentiary.

About four o’clock on the morning of March 24, 1949, two police officers of the city of El Paso, while cruising in a patrol car, noticed appellant and one Reynosa at a filling station and, because of their action and conduct, took them into custody. There were found, in appellant’s possession, a guitar and, in Reynosa’s, a typewriter. The two men were carried to the police station. At that time the police officers had no information that a burglary had been committed; they began an investigation and subsequently discovered that the drug store, or pharmacy, of Acosta had been broken into and burglarized that night. The typewriter -and guitar found in the possession of Reynosa and appellant were definitely identified as having been taken from the burglarized premises.

Appellant, testifying as a witness in his own behalf, denied any knowledge of or participation in the burglary. He explained his possession of the guitar by saying that just prior to the time the officers arrested them he chanced to meet Reynosa, who handed him the guitar and asked that he help him by carrying it. Appellant also testified to an alibi, in which he was corroborated by another witness.

The trial court pertinently submitted to the jury the defensive issues of alibi and explanation by appellant of his possession of the recently stolen property. These the jury rejected.

The jury’s rejection of appellant’s explanation of his possession of the recently stolen guitar constitutes a finding that the explanation made was not reasonable. The sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction must be tested in the light of this finding.

The unexplained possession of property recently stolen from a burglarized house is a sufficient circumstance upon which a jury may convict the possessor of the property for the burglary. Authorities attesting the rule are numerous, and will be found collated in 6 Texas Digest, Burglary,

The facts are sufficient to support the verdict. Appellant’s admission, while testifying as a witness in his own behalf, of his possession of the recently stolen guitar rendered untenable his objection to proof thereof because of an alleged unlawful arrest. Valenzuela v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 224 S.W.2d 239; Soble v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 218 S.W.2d 195.

Other bills of exception appearing in the record have been examined, and are overruled without discussion.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed. ■

Opinion approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*





In connection with the Annual Report of Martin Midstream Partners L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert D. Bondurant, Chief Financial Officer of Martin Midstream GP LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1)          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.








/s/ Robert D. BondurantRobert D. Bondurant,Chief Financial Officerof Martin Midstream GP LLC,General Partner of Martin Midstream Partners L.P.March 28, 2014





*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               3
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       71
<ALLOWANCES>                                         8
<INVENTORY>                                         66
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   960
<PP&E>                                             334
<DEPRECIATION>                                      92
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              126
<BONDS>                                              2
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         15
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                        1007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1207
<SALES>                                            213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   213
<CGS>                                              107
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     30
<INCOME-TAX>                                        12
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 18
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        18
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-28-1998
<CASH>                                           4,518
<SECURITIES>                                    53,631
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,080
<INVENTORY>                                     78,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               246,598
<PP&E>                                          95,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 322,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,678
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,260
<OTHER-SE>                                     248,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   322,639
<SALES>                                        418,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               426,493
<CGS>                                          218,208
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 81,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,025
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,051
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,051
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
        

</TABLE>
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

IDocket No. FAA-2010-0554; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-082-AD; Amen

10Lf76 ;L I- If,

39-**; AD 2010-**-**)

RlN 2120-AA64

UTIN(jHMIlOI.

\

c; 'Z., } (p

OUTlNCi 5YMIlOL A /V';I,f / rOo

INI'I'I~I.sr.;lO

A B'\\\r?"\~

1

'/0 (, 110

Oll11NQ SVMUOi..

.. ~

1

e

OlJmlG SYMIlOI.

I"rnALSISIC

r.we

ATI'

FlI11NOSl"Ml>OL

also

NI11Al.S1SIC;

's,

m

I .on

.'0(; S't0lll0L

~TIlfJ.S/Sj(i

m

This new AD requires these same actions, using corrected service information. Th

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for the

products listed above. That AD currently requirel modifying the auxiliary hydraul

and consequent loss of the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effee.ive [INSERT DATE B5 DAYS AFTER DATE OF

I

PUBLlCATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

power system (including doing all applicable related investigative and corrective a

ACTION: Final rule.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer, as well as r

of electrically shorted wires in the right wheel wbll and evidence of arcing on the

auxiliary hydraulic pump power cables, whieh,e routed within the tire burst area

are issuing this AD to prevent electrically shortetl wires or arcing at the auxiliary

hydraulic pwnp power cables, which could resull in a fire in the wheel well. We ar

issuing this AD to reduce the potential of an ignition source adjacent to the fuel tan

which, in combination with flammable fuel vapQrs, could result in a fuel tank exp
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.6.7      Quaker City Bank Three Year Employment Agreement Renewal and
                    Extension Acknowledgment between Quaker City Bank and
                    Frederic R. McGill dated July 1, 2001.


                                QUAKER CITY BANK
                        THREE YEAR EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                      RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT



Name of Executive:   Frederic R. (Rick) McGill
                    ---------------------------------------


The undersigned executive does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly
scheduled meeting on June 21, 2001, the Board of Directors of Quaker City Bank
acted to renew and extend the Quaker City Bank Three Year Employment Agreement
with the undersigned executive to a full thirty-six (36) month term, until
June 30, 2004.


Dated this     1st     day of        July           , A.D.,      2001          .
           ---     ---        ------      ----------        ----      ---------



                                            QUAKER CITY BANK



 /s/Frederic R. McGill                      By: /s/Jerome L. Thomas
----------------------------------------       -------------------------------
Executive                                      Chairman of the Board
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

CHELSEA D. EDWARDS,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 30127

D.C. No. 3:15

- cr

- 00112

- EJL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

Rosanna Malouf Peterson, District Judge, Presiding **

Submitted March 8, 2017 * * *

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Chelsea D. Edwards appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 18

- month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The Honorable Rosanna Malouf Peterson, United States District

Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation.

** * The panel unanimously con cludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 14 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 30127

Edwards contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to

explain the sentence adequately , justify its upward variance from the Guidelines

range, and respond to her mitigating arguments

. We review for plain error, see

United States v. Miqb el , 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), and hold that there is

none. The record reflects that the district court considered Edwards’s arguments

for a mid

- range sentence and sufficiently explained its reasons for the above

Guidelines sentence

. See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008)

(en banc).

Edwards next claims that her senten ce is substantively unreasonable . The

district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38,

51 (2007). The above

- Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of

the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances,

including Edwards’s extensive criminal history and her repeated breaches of t he

court’s trust. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51; United States v. Simtob , 485 F.3d 1058,

10 62

- 63 (9th Cir. 2007).

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC

vs.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.,

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,

INC.

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00507-ADA

ORDER RESETTING MARKMAN MARKMAN HEARING HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is reset for

MARKMAN HEARING by Zoomoom on Thursday, April 01, 2021 at 03:30 PM.

reset

IT 23rd day of March, 2021.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 42 Filed 03/23/21 Page 1 of 1
---

EXHIBIT 12.2

SARBANES-OXLEY CFO CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey R. Mason , Chief Financial Officer of Amarc
Resources Ltd. , certify that:

1.           I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Amarc Resources Ltd.

2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.           The
  Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
  and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
  Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a)          
  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
  controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
  material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
  period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated
  the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and
  presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
  controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
  based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed
  in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting
  that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
  affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal
  control over financial reporting; and

5.           The
  Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
  most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to
  the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board
  of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           All
  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
  of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
  adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and
  report financial information; and

(b)           Any
  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
  who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial
  reporting.

|Date:  | September 12, 2005        | 
|------ | ------------------------- | 
|       |                           | 
|       |                           | 
|       | /s/
      Jeffrey R Mason | 
|By:    | Jeffrey R. Mason          | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer   | 

---



---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5280 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5280

         To suspend temporarily the duty on certain alginates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Ms. Pingree of Maine introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on certain alginates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ALGINATES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Alginic acid (CAS   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          No. 9005-32-7),                                                   12/31/2015
                          ammonium alginate
                          (9005-34-9),
                          potassium
                          alginate (CAS No.
                          9005-36-1),
                          calcium alginate
                          (9005-35-0), and
                          magnesium
                          alginate (CAS No.
                          37251-44-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3913.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 19 - 00136 - CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF TERRI F . ADAMS AND TERRY R. ADAMS

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 1

Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016 - 523,388, Honorable Mark Hocker, Presiding



### May 6 , 2019 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and P ARKER , JJ. Appellant Terry R. Adams , appearing pro se , attempt s to appeal (1) the trial court’s

“ Agreed Order on Motion to Enforce Agreed Final Decree of Divorce & Order Clarifying Final Decree of Divorce ” and (2) the “Notice of Nonsuit of Motion to Enforce Protective Order” filed by appellee, Terri F. Adams . We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The agreed order enforcing and clarifying the divorce decree was signed by the trial court in January 2019 , but does not show the da y of signing . Because Adams did not file any timely post - judgment motions that extend ed the notice of appeal deadline, his notice of appeal was due thirty days after the order was signed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.1(a ). Assuming the trial court signed the order on the last day of January 2019, Adams’s notice of appeal was due , at the latest, by March 4, 2019 . See T EX . R. A PP . P.2

26.1 , 4.1(a). This deadline could have been extended by fifteen days to March 19 had Adams filed his notice of appeal and a motion for an extension of time by that date . See T EX . R. A PP . P . 26.3 . S ee also Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (implying a motion for extension when an appellant tenders a notice of appeal with in fifteen days after the notice deadline). Adams did not file a notice of appeal until April 8, 2019 . See T EX . R. A PP . P . 9.2(b) (mailbox rule). By letter of April 12, 2019, we notified Adam s that his notice of appeal appeared to have been filed untimely and directed him to file a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal or the appeal would be dismis sed for want of jurisdiction. Adams filed a response but failed to demonstrate grounds for continuing the appeal . A timely filed notice of appeal is required to invoke this c ourt’s appellate jurisdiction. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.1(b), 26.1; Verburgt , 959 S.W.2d at 617. Because Adams’ s notice of appeal was not timely filed, we must dismiss the appeal. As for Adams ’s appeal from the notice of nonsuit, o ur jurisdiction is dependent upon the existence of a final judgment or appea lable order. See Lehmann v. Har - Con Corp ., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Stary v. DeBord , 967 S.W.2d 352, 352 - 53 (Tex. 1998) (per curiam) . Because a notice of nonsuit is not a judgment or appealable order of the trial court , we lack jurisdiction over t he appeal . Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.3(a) . Per Curiam
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
COLLEGELINK.COM INCORPORATED 10QSB
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         355,095
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  677,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               279,877
<PP&E>                                       1,140,872
<DEPRECIATION>                                 407,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,268,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          659,301
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  8,584,980
<COMMON>                                        15,091
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,008,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,268,054
<SALES>                                        763,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               777,840
<CGS>                                          790,560
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,675,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                89,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,987,280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,987,280)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,987,280)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>