alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT D

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 66-4 Filed 02/03/23 Page 1 of 2
FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22

Overall 

Median 

per Origin

District Court 11.8 12.0 12.0 13.0 13.0 14.0 16.0 13.0 12.0 12.0 12.5

Court of Federal Claims 10.4 10.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 11.0 12.0 15.0 12.0 18.0 10.7

Court of International Trade 12.4 13.0 12.0 13.0 15.0 14.0 14.0 15.0 13.0 13.0 13.0

Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 11.2 10.0 7.0 7.5 6.0 14.0 12.0 7.5 10.0 10.0 10.0

Board of Contract Appeals 13.3 16.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 13.5 16.0 14.0 11.5 13.0 13.2

Department of Veterans Affairs n/a n/a 16.0 13.0 17.0 19.0 17.0 15.5 28.0 20.0 17.0

Department of Justice 9.7 12.0 5.9 12.0 13.0 12.0 15.0 11.5 4.5 7.5 11.8

International Trade Commission 13.7 16.0 13.0 17.0 13.0 11.0 17.0 17.0 14.5 18.0 15.3

Merit Systems Protection Board 7.4 6.0 6.5 7.0 6.0 12.0 12.5 11.0 10.0 10.0 8.7

Office of Compliance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 14.0 13.0 n/a n/a n/a 13.5

Patent and Trademark Office 10.1 10.0 11.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 15.0 14.0 14.0 15.0 13.5

Government Accountability Office n/a n/a n/a 11.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 11.0

Overall Median per Fiscal Year 11.2 12.0 10.5 11.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 14.0 12.0 13.0 12.5

1

 Excludes cross and consolidated appeals, writs, and OPM petitions

2

 Calculated from Date of Docketing or Date of Reinstatement, whichever is later

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Median Time to Disposition in Cases Terminated After Hearing or Submission1

Docketing Date2 to Disposition Date, in Months

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 66-4 Filed 02/03/23 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC,

 Plaintiff 

-vMICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

 Defendant 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

W-20-CV-00454-ADA 

W-20-CV-00455-ADA 

W-20-CV-00456-ADA 

W-20-CV-00457-ADA 

W-20-CV-00458-ADA 

W-20-CV-00459-ADA 

W-20-CV-00460-ADA 

W-20-CV-00461-ADA 

W-20-CV-00462-ADA 

W-20-CV-00463-ADA 

W-20-CV-00464-ADA 

W-20-CV-00465-ADA 

ORDER APPOINTING TECHNICAL ADVISOR 

The Court hereby appoints Dr. Joshua J. Yi to serve as the Technical Advisor for the Court 

in this case. Dr. Yi’s contact information is as follows: 

Dr. Joshua J. Yi 

8650 Spicewood Springs Road, Suite 145, #226 

Austin, TX 78759 

josh@joshuayipatentlaw.com 

Dr. Yi will assist the Court with technical issues related to the claim construction process 

and advise the Court regarding preliminary and final claim constructions. Because a technical 

advisor serves essentially as a law clerk to the Court and will be familiar with the claim 

construction issues in this case, Dr. Yi may also assist the Court in drafting a claim construction 

order. 

The parties are instructed to mail a paper copy of the claim construction briefs and a USB 

drive with any exhibits and/or technology tutorials to the above address no later than at least 10 

days before the claim construction hearing. 

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 47 Filed 02/01/21 Page 1 of 2
Finally, depending on the needs of the case, Dr. Yi may also assist the Court with motions 

for summary judgment, Daubert motions, at trial, and with post-trial motions. 

SIGNED this 1st day of February, 2021. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 47 Filed 02/01/21 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v.

ZTE CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO. W-20-CV-00491-ADA

ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Before the Court is the parties’ discovery dispute concerning the timing of expert witness 

depositions. On February 2, 2023, the Court heard oral argument on the dispute. The close of 

rebuttal expert reports is today, February 2, 2023, and Defendant requested Brazos tender its experts for depositions prior to today’s deadline, while Brazos argued that, under the OGP and local rules, expert depositions need not occur before rebuttal reports are submitted. Given the impeding deadline, the Court ORDERS as follows: 

All remaining case deadlines are unchanged—including the Feb. 2, 2023 rebuttal report 

deadline—and any request of an extension is DENIED. Any expert or declarant relied on by an 

expert whose deposition is requested during expert discovery must be made available on or before the close of expert discovery. This includes Roy Weinstein, Dr. William Mangione-Smith, 

Stephen Gray, and the declarant, Shauna Wiest. The deposing party is permitted to supplement 

it’s rebuttal expert’s report within 2 days of completion of the deposition of an expert who filed 

an opening report. Any depositions requested before February 10, 2023, must be completed by 

Case 6:20-cv-00491-ADA-DTG Document 319 Filed 02/02/23 Page 1 of 2
2

the close of expert discovery. Failure to present an expert whose deposition was timely requested 

will result in the expert being barred from testifying at trial. 

The parties can agree to take depositions after the expert discovery deadline, but the 

Court will not entertain any motions to enforce such agreements. 

All case deadlines will remain unchanged.

SIGNED this 2nd day of February, 2023.

DEREK T. GILLILAND

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00491-ADA-DTG Document 319 Filed 02/02/23 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and Industrial Innovation (1194).                    

*Date and Time:*                         November 3, 2000, 8:00 am-5:30 pm.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Room 340, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Ronald Rardin, Program Directors, DMII, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 292-8330.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate CAREER proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters that are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 522b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-26322  Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41176

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN ALLEN WALTER,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:97-CR-28-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

May 15, 1998

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Allen Walter appeals his sentence for bank robbery,

assaultive conduct during the robbery, and using or carrying a

gun while committing a crime of violence. He argues that he

should not have been sentenced as a career offender because his

prior convictions for robbery were for robberies which occurred

within 19 days of each other and were for the common plan to

obtain money for housing. The district court did not err when it
No. 97-41176

-2-

sentenced Walter as a career offender. See United States v.

Garcia, 962 F.2d 479, 481-82 (5th Cir. 1992); U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines § 4B1.1. 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 12

Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 44-14 Filed 11/04/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 44-14 Filed 11/04/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 44-14 Filed 11/04/20 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Margaret M. Taylor, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Access National Corporation; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: May 1, 2017 |                                   
|----------------- | ----------------------------------
|                  |                                   
|                  | /s/  Margaret M. Taylor           
|                  | Margaret M. Taylor                
|                  | Executive Vice President and Chief
|                  | Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5397 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5397

      To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Pyraclostrobin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

    Mr. Graves of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Pyraclostrobin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PYRACLOSTROBIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.21 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Pyraclostrobin) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
"incapacitated for the purpose of practicing law" and confirm the

transferof Shadek to disability inactive status. 

### See SCR 117(2). Shadek may resume the practice of law only after he complies with SCR 117(4) and (5). Docket No. 64280 is an automatic review under SCR 105(3)(b) of a disciplinary board hearing panel's recommendation that Shadek be disbarred from the practice of law due to violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. SCR 117(2) requires that any pending disciplinary proceedings against an attorney be suspended when he is transferred to disability inactive status, and this court suspended the proceedings in Docket No. 64280 in its February 27 order. As we have now confirmed the transfer to disability inactive status, we likewise confirm the suspension of the proceedings in Docket No. 64280. In order to avoid this matter lingering indefinitely on this court's docket pending Shadek's compliance with SCR 117(4) and (5), we conclude that judicial efficiency will be best served if Docket No. 64280 is dismissed without prejudice. Thus, Docket No. 64280 is dismissed without prejudice to the State Bar's ability to reinitiate such proceedings, if appropriate, upon Shadek's reinstatement to the active practice of law. Further, any other disciplinary proceedings pending against Shadek are suspended. SCR 117(2).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A 

### eCherry



## .-LA44 

## an The state bar shall effect notice of this order as required under SCR 121.1. Bar counsel shall provide this court with proof that notice has been served. It is so ORDERED...1

C.J. Gibbons

5 

# A O..A frea-4- 2 \ J Pickering Hardesty

Parraguirrer 

### \As s ) Douglas

cc: David A. Clark, Bar Counsel J. Thomas Susich, Chair, Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada John Shadek Perry Thompson, United States Supreme Court Admissions Office

'This constitutes our final disposition of these matters. Any new proceedings concerning Shadek shall be docketed as a new and separate matter.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3
(0) 1947A 54/1910
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project Nos. 2516 and 2517]

Allegheny Energy Supply, licensee for the Dam No. 4 Project No. 2516 and the Dam No. 5 Project No. 2517, currently is consulting with state and federal agencies concerning the relicensing of those projects. In this regard, Commission staff intends to participate with representatives of the licensee, resource agencies, and concerned non-governmental entities at a meeting to be held at the Hagerstown Corporate Center, 10435 Downsville Pike, Hagerstown, Maryland, at 10:00 a.m., Thursday, November 2, 2000. All interested persons are welcome to attend.

For further information, please contact Charles Simons, of Allegheny Energy Supply, on (724) 838-6397.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26551 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5611 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5611

       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain swimming pools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Ellison introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain swimming pools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SWIMMING POOLS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Children's          Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          inflatable                                                        12/31/2015
                          swimming pools of
                          polyvinyl
                          chloride, not
                          exceeding 1.651
                          meters in
                          diameter
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          9506.99.55)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE SPECTRUM CONTROL, INC. CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT
AUGUST 31, 1996 AND CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO ITS FORM 10-Q FOR THE THIRD QUARTER ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000092769
<NAME> JACK FREEMAN
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                             402
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,553
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,732
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,097
<PP&E>                                          38,045
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,040
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,653
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        13,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,247
<SALES>                                         42,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,441
<CGS>                                           28,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,875
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,551
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,417
<INCOME-TAX>                                       957
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,460
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,460
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
Order entered October 16, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00154-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

TERRANCE GERMAINE WILKINS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-62224-X

ORDER

On August 13, 2013, on the Court’s own motion, we abated this appeal pending receipt of 

a supplemental record. The materials have been received and this appeal is hereby 

REINSTATED.

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended on March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and to which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Sarah H. Moore, the principal financial officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 5, 2005



/s/    SARAH H. MOORESarah H. Moore Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and will be retained by The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 2

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009755

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009756

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 3 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009757

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 4 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009758

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 5 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009759

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 6 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009760

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 7 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009761

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 8 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009762

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 9 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009763

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 10 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009764

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 11 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009765

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 12 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009766

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 13 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009767

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 14 of 15
Microsoft_HoloLens_WSOU000009768

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 46-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 15 of 15