alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
City Clerk

Page 1 of 1

Contents. Search -

No Frames Chaoter 15.40 FIREPLACES

Homi.

Henderson Municipal Section 15.40.010 Fireplaces in new

Code

construction and new fireplaces a .

in existing construction. Preface

6.ver.mesl

Effective upon publication of the ordinance

CHARTER

codified in this section, no fireplace

constructed shall be

in any residential dwelling unit In

Title 1 GENERAL Henderson unless it is one of the following:

qutr.ac

—:

PROVISIONS

with

A.

a nationally

A fireplace equipped with gas logs

ADMINISTRATION by

recognized listing approved

the building official;

AND PERSONNEL

factory-built

B. A dedicated natural gas burning

fireplace with a nationally

Title 3 (RESERVED)

official;

recognized llstlng approved by the building

Title 4 BUSINESS C. A dedicated woodburnlng factory-built REGULATIONS PND fireplace that conforms to the Phase II

UCENSES

Enronmantal Protlon Agency Standards

.e

for Wood Heaters, as presented by NSPS,

Title S HEALTH

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart M.A (emitting less

SANiTATION

as

than 7.5 grams per hour of particular matter),

verified by a nationally recognized listing Title 6 CIVIL approved by the building official; SERVICE

0. A masonry fireplace

with

that complies

Section 3102.7 of the Uniform Building

TItle 7 ANIMALS

Code, 1994 editIon; or

Title 8 PUBUC PEACE E. A decorative electrical appliance with

AND SAFETY

the

a nationally

building

recognized listing approved by

official. (Ord. 1697

Title 9 (RESERVED)

§ 1, 1996)

Title 10 VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC V

Title it STREETS

AND SIDEWALKS

Title 12 (RESERVED)

ml. 13 UTILITIES

TItle 14 (RESERVED)

Title 15 BUILDINGS ‘

AND

CONSTRUCTION

Title 16 TRAILER

PARKS

Title 17 TRAVEL TRAil ER PLRIC _j

911912002
#### GAINES v. STATE.

No. 27077.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

June 26, 1954.

Reid & Reid, by J. W. Reid, Abilene, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for the sale of beer in a dry area; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $500.

The complaint alleged the sale of beer to James L. Douglas on or about October 15, 1953, but such complaint was sworn to, according to the record, on October 3, 1953, which was before the date the offense was alleged to have been committed.

The state confesses error under, the authority of Bradshaw v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 243 S.W.2d 586.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0093 IN THE MATTER OF: M.J.W., A Youth In Need of Care
. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Nancy Skurvid is granted an extension of time to and including May 6, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 2 2021

04/02/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0093
Exhibit 10.8
 INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
2004 RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN
 As Amended and Restated, effective December 31, 2008
 PURPOSE
   DEFINITIONS
  Act
 Award
 Award Agreement
 Board
 Committee
 Corporation
 Employee
   Grantee




---



##### 



Plan
 Share
 Stock
 Subsidiary
 EFFECTIVE DATE
  STOCK RESERVED UNDER PLAN
  ADMINISTRATION
  TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AWARDS
 -2-




---



##### 



Award Agreements
 Number of Shares
 Consideration for Awards
 Vesting and Forfeiture
 Time of Issuance
 Withholding
 Nontransferability of Awards
 -3-




---



##### 



Rights as Stockholder
 Modification, Extension, and Renewal of Awards
 Cancellation and Rescission
 Other Provisions
 Specific Amendments of Outstanding Awards
 TERM OF PLAN
  RECAPITALIZATIONS
  -4-




---



##### 



RESTRICTIONS ON SHARES ISSUED
  SECURITIES LAW REQUIREMENTS
 Legality of Issuance
  -5-




---



##### 



Registration or Qualification of Securities
 Exchange of Certificates
 LEGENDS
  -6-




---



##### 



AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN
  NUMBER AND GENDER
  GOVERNING LAW
  EXECUTION
   INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.By
    
    /s/ Jeffrey C. Sprecher

Jeffrey C. Sprecher, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy
    
    /s/ Johnathan H. Short

Johnathan H. Short, Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary
 -7-
Take notice that on January 24, 2000, CNG Transmission Corporation (CNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with an effective date of February 1, 2000:

Twenty-Eight Revised Sheet No. 31

Fifty-Fifth Revised Sheet No. 32

Forty-Seventy Revised Sheet No. 33

Twenty-First Revised Sheet No. 34

Twenty-Fourth Revised Sheet No. 35

Third Revised Sheet No. 130

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 346

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 347

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 348

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 349

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 350A

Third Revised Sheet No. 380 

CNG states that the purpose of this filing is to implement the Stipulation and Agreement Amending Rate Case Settlement filed October 5, 1999, (Settlement) that was approved by the Settlement Order. To implement the Settlement, CNG is required to make two types of tariff revisions: (1) It must reduce its rates as required by the Settlement for services that are subject to the Transportation Cost Rate Adjustment (TCRA); and (2) it must revise certain tariff language that is affected by the Settlement.

CNG states that copies of its letter of transmittal and enclosures have been served upon CNG's customers and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-2652  Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Louisiana - North Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Louisiana - North Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 277    | 189    | 254    | 242    | 281    | 141    | 189    | 1,242  | 1,148  | 51    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 562    | 5,046  | 176    | 1,153  | 4,217  | 417    | 3,362  | 2,950  | 1,572  | 7,061 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 945    | 13,276 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60922-60923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26269]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License; Daniel G. Jablonski

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy gives notice of its intent to grant 
Daniel G. Jablonski, a revocable, nonassignable, exclusive license in 
the United States to practice the Government-owned invention, U.S. 
Patent Number 4,881,080 Apparatus for and a Method of Determining 
Compass Headings.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting

[[Page 60923]]

evidence, if any not later than December 12, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with Carderock Division, 
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Code 004, 9500 MacArthur Blvd., West 
Bethesda MD 20817-5700.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Dick Bloomquist, Director 
Technology Transfer, Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, 
Code 0117, 9500 MacArthur Blvd., West Bethesda, MD 20817-5700, (301) 
227-4299.

    Dated: September 26, 2000.
J.L. Roth,
Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison 
Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-26269 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 200 (Monday, October 16, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 61125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26513]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 36

[Docket No. FAA-2000-7958; Notice No. 00-12]
RIN 2120-AH10


Noise Certification Regulations for Helicopters; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION:  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the notice of proposed 
rulemaking, published in the Federal Register on October 5, 2000 (65 FR 
59634). That NPRM proposed changes to the noise certification 
regulations for helicopters. Those proposed changes are based on a 
joint effort by the FAA, the European Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA), 
and Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC), to harmonize the 
U.S. noise certification regulations and the European Joint Aviation 
Requirements (JAR) for helicopter. The harmonization of the noise 
certification standards would simplify airworthiness approvals for 
import and export purposes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandy Liu, (202) 493-4864.

Correction of Publication

    In NPRM FR Doc. 00-24634, beginning on page 59634 in the Federal 
Register issue of October 5, 2000, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 59634, in column 1, in the heading section, beginning on 
line 4, correct ``Notice No. 00-11'' to read ``Notice No. 00-12''.

    Issued in Washington, DC on October 10, 2000.
Donald P. Byrne,
Assistant Chief Counsel, Regulations Division.
[FR Doc. 00-26513 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
No. 89-565 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

MIKE MIGHT, 

Appellant, 

-vsERMINDO ZAVARELLI and AMVETS POST NO. 4, 

Petitioner and Respondents, 

- 

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, --i r- 3 

I.-,, =3 

LIQUOR DIVISION and LEO MIGHT, - - -.- 5-l 

- 

Respondents and Respondents. 

c-2 ; . 

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fourth ~udicia~~is<~ct, 

In and for the County of Missoula, 5 

The Honorable Douglas G. Harkin, Judge presiding. 

COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

For Appellant (s) : 

Timothy D. Geiszler; Geiszler & Newcomer, Missoula, 

Montana 

For Respondent (s) : 

John C. Schulte, Missoula, Montana 

Eric Fehlig, Tax Counsel, Dept. of Revenue, Helena, 

Montana 

Leo Might, Pro Se, Missoula, Montana 

Filed: 

Submitted on Briefs: Jan. 25, 1990 

Decided: March 9, 1990 

{ Clerk 
Justice John C. Sheehy delivered the Opinion of the Court. 

Mike Might appeals the partial summary judgment granted by the 

District Court, Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County to 

petitioners/respondents Ermindo Zavarelli and Amvets Post No. 4, 

allowing the status of the premises located at 411 N. California, 

Missoula, Montana, to continue as a legal nonconforming use. This 

Court finds substantial evidence in the record which supports the 

District Court's judgment. Further, we accept the District Court's 

determination that, an earlier declaratory judgment of the District 

Court controlled, the lapse of time was beyond the control of 

petitioners, and there is no evidence of abandonment to trigger the 

90-day lapse provision of the zoning ordinance. Petitioners are 

not barred from applying for a new beverage license. 

Affirmed. Let remittitur issue forthwith. See Rules 34 and 

35, M.R.App.P. 

Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 

1988 Internal Operating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as 

precedent and shall be published by its filing as a public document 

with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and by a report of its result 

to Montana Law Week, State Reporter and West Publishing Company. 

Justice ' 

We Concur: / 

7 .q , Chief Justice // 

Justices '
Disclosure

1 David B. Kuznick

On June 25th, 1984 I was still a student at Hunter College High School. I was entering 

the subway at my home station, reached into my backpack, and pulled out my school-issued 

subway pass to show the attendant as I went through the gate (the normal way to use it in those 

days). A police officer stopped me and told me he was citing me for trespassing. At first, I did 

not know what he was talking about. Then I noticed that I had pulled my previous month's pass 

out of my backpack inadvertently, rather than the current month's pass. When I tried to explain 

this to the officer and ask him to let me get the correct one out, he told me if I said anything else 

he would take me to jail. My initial court date was at the Queens Criminal Courthouse, 125-01 

Queens Boulevard, Kew Gardens, NY, 11415. This was in early July 1984, most likely. When 

the judge arraigned me, he told me I should probably get an attorney because if I pled guilty in 

front of him he would put me in jail because I had the previous trespassing charge, even though 

it had been dismissed (see below). I hired the mother of a friend of mine, Eleanor Burstein, a 

local attorney who lived at 111-28 75th Rd., Forest Hills, NY, 11375. She is now deceased. At 

my next court date in August 1984, Attorney Burstein explained the situation to the judge and 

showed him that I in fact had the correct subway pass, and had nothing on my record other than 

these charges. The judge dismissed the charge.

The earlier incident took place around the fall of 1981 or 1982; I simply do not remember 

and do not have records from then. I was attending Hunter College High School at 94th Street 

and Park Avenue in Manhattan, NY. I was taking swimming for Physical Education, which took 

place at Hunter College, which is at 68th Street and Lexington Avenue. At that time, students 

were given subway passes that were technically only valid at their home station and at the High 

School's station. However, we were informed by school administration that we could use them 

at the Hunter College stop because we were attending a required school class. On one such 

Case 6:20-cv-00481-ADA Document 50-1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 1 of 2
Disclosure

2 David B. Kuznick

occasion, when using the pass at the Hunter College station after swimming class, I was stopped 

by police and given a citation for trespassing, I believe. I appeared in court in Manhattan a few 

months later on my court date (perhaps December, 1986 or 1987). I believe it was the New York 

Criminal Court at 100 Centre Street, NY, NY. At my arraignment, I explained my story to the 

judge. He told me that he would dismiss the charge, but that the school was wrong, and that I 

was not to use the pass like that again. I had stopped using the pass for swim class after the 

citation and never used it again like that.

David B. Kuznick

Case 6:20-cv-00481-ADA Document 50-1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2


                            ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

         I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates,
AIG Debenture-Backed Series 2002-10 Trust (the "Trust"), certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the Trust
         and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing
         reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in respect of
         periods included in the year covered by this annual report of the
         Trust;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
         provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
         under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in
         such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

     4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee
         under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my
         knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has
         fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.



Date: March 26, 2008


/s/ David Kolibachuk
-----------------------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
n 

## X X -

Cy H (2y+1) C y H (2y+1) - Cy H (2y+1)
EXHIBIT 31.2

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Stephen J. Smith, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Elizabeth Arden, Inc. (the "registrant");

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 6, 2005
    
/s/ Stephen J. Smith
  
Stephen J. Smith
  
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 

 ***
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0460 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRANDON LEE BLACK,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 1 4, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 9 2023

07/10/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0460
Exhibit 10.5


 


   



    	 	1	 



    	 	 	 



    




 


    



    	 	2	 



    	 	 	 



    




  


  


 



    	 	3
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Robert E. Barberee * From the 266th District Court

and Jane Barberee, of Erath County,

 Trial Court No. CV31048.

Vs. No. 11-16-00316-CV * October 4, 2018

Todd Fanning and * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

Fanning Construction, Inc., (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.;

 Gray, C.J., sitting by assignment;

and Wright, S.C.J., sitting by 

assignment) 

 (Willson, J., not participating)

 

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal are taxed against Robert E. Barberee and Jane Barberee.