alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                                
|                                                                                                             
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                             
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 57     | 24     | 236    | 216   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 227    | 374    | 466    | 333    | 448    | 456    | 639    | 714    | 696    | 2,282 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5,472  | 13,069 | 17,236 | 21,500 | 24,089 | 17,145 | 18,431 | 25,136 | 36,435 | 41,577
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 27,478 | 37,198 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

APPLE INC.

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00505

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having considered Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern 

District of California and the related briefing, the Court hereby GRANTS Apple’s Motion. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), the Court hereby transfers this case to the Northern 

District of California.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to transfer the case to the Northern District of 

California.

SIGNED this ___ day of November, 2020

UNITED STATES JUDGE ALAN D. ALBRIGHT

Case 6:20-cv-00505-ADA Document 27-23 Filed 11/05/20 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 12
              BellSouth Telecommunications Inc.
          Computation Of Earnings To Fixed Charges
                    (Dollars In Millions)



                                             
                                              For the Nine
                                              Months Ended
                                             September 30,
                                                  1996
1. Earnings                                  
                                             
   (a) Income from continuing operations     
before deductions for taxes and interest         $2,876
                                             
   (b) Portion of rental expense             
representative of interest factor                    44
                                             
     TOTAL                                       $2,920
                                             
2. Fixed Charges                             
                                             
   (a) Interest                                    $424
                                             
   (b) Portion of rental expense             
representative of interest factor                    44
                                             
     TOTAL                                         $468
                                             
   Ratio (1 divided by 2)                           6.2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

COURTNEY COX,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 434 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of March, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
In the Missouri Court of Appeals 

Eastern District 

APRIL 29, 2014 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b). 

1. ED99476 SAMER Z. MURATOVIC, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, 

RES 

2. ED99669 ETHEL MCFARLAND, APP V. ROBERT TRAME, ET AL, RES 

3. ED99939 AM BUILDERS CONTRACT, RES V. R.G. ROSS, APP 

4. ED100219 CHARLES NUNLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2630 

To require a report from the Comptroller General of the United States 

regarding implementation of the Immigration Reform and Control Act 

of 1986, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2013 

Mr. BARLETTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require a report from the Comptroller General of the 

United States regarding implementation of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘1986 Amnesty Trans5 parency Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GAO REPORT. 

7 Not later than the date that is 1 year after the date 

8 of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2630 IH

1 United States shall submit to the Committee on the Judi2 ciary of the House of Representatives, the Committee on 

3 the Judiciary of the Senate, the Committee on Homeland 

4 Security of the House of Representatives, and the Com5 mittee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

6 of the Senate a report on the implementation of the Immi7 gration Reform and Control Act of 1986 that includes in8 formation on the following: 

9 (1) What employer requirements were imple10 mented. 

11 (2) How the Federal Government enforces the 

12 laws that prohibit hiring aliens who were unlawfully 

13 present in the United States or unauthorized to 

14 work in the United States. 

15 (3) How many individuals were denied employ16 ment. 

17 (4) Were any employers sanctioned. 

18 (5) What border enforcement mechanisms were 

19 enhanced to prevent an increase of illegal immigra20 tion. 

21 (6) How visa overstay issues were addressed. 

22 (7) The added cost to society through increased 

23 social benefits provided to aliens who were unlaw24 fully present in the United States. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2630 IH

1 (8) How implementation of the Act impacted 

2 United States workers, including any impact on 

3 wages of workers by industry sector and on the un4 employment rate. 

5 (9) The cost of implementation of the Act. 

6 (10) The rates of fraud that took place as a re7 sult of the Act, including the controls and mecha8 nisms implemented to address and prevent illegal 

9 immigrants from using fraudulent documents to 

10 claim amnesty. 

11 (11) How could similar incidents be prevented 

12 in any future program to provide for legalization of 

13 presence. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5628 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures or coprecipitates 

of yttrium oxide and europium oxide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures 

or coprecipitates of yttrium oxide and europium oxide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OR COPRECIPITATES OF YTTRIUM 

4 OXIDE AND EUROPIUM OXIDE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.04 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 mixtures or coprecipitates of yttrium oxide and europium 

8 oxide) is amended by striking the date in the effective pe9 riod column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5628 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1


MOVIE STAR, INC.
136 Madison Avenue
New York, NY  10016


Gentlemen:

     We hereby agree that the Financing Agreement between us dated April 24,
1996 be and the same is hereby amended by:

     Amending the affirmative Financial Covenants in Paragraph 6.9 to read as
follows:

     Affirmative Financial Covenants.  Borrower shall until payment in full of
all Obligations to Lender and termination of this Agreement (a) cause to be
maintained at the end of each fiscal quarter (i.e., December, March, June and
September), Tangible Net Worth in an amount not less than $1,500,000; and (b)
cause to be maintained at the end of each fiscal quarter, Working Capital of
not less than $12,500,000.

The foregoing amendment shall be effective as of September 27, 1996.  In all
other respects, the terms and conditions of the aforesaid agreement as the same
may heretofore been amended, shall remain unchanged.


                                            ROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL, INC.



                                            By:  /s/ Jerry Sandak
                                                -----------------------------
                                                     Jerry Sandak, Exec. V.P.
                                                     10/24/96

THE FOREGOING IS ACKNOWLEDGED &
AGREED TO 
MOVIE STAR, INC.



By:  /s/ Saul Pomerantz
   -------------------------------
         Saul Pomerantz, Sr. V.P.
         10/28/96
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        8388
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             41139
<PP&E>                                    19243251
<DEPRECIATION>                               26437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            19277953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      4937818
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     83465
<OTHER-SE>                                14256670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              19277953
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            352809
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          593428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (946172)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (946172)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (946172)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.02)


</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5631 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rolling travel bags with a 

removable backpack or daypack. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. POLIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rolling travel 

bags with a removable backpack or daypack. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ROLLING TRAVEL BAGS WITH A RE4 MOVABLE BACKPACK OR DAYPACK. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5631 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Travel bags of manmade 

fibers, with wheels, a telescoping handle, stowable 

shoulder straps, and a removable separate backpack 

or daypack attached by 

zipper or other means, valued over $30, not to exceed 

85 liters in volume, and removable separate backpack 

or daypack not to exceed 

26 liters in volume (provided for in subheading 

4202.12.80) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q DATED
JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<CIK> 0000094673
<NAME> STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000


<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                            248,135
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     484,112 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       223,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,079,192
<PP&E>                            272,528 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,556,125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             650,497
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           10,157
<OTHER-SE>                        882,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,556,125
<SALES>                           650,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  972,146
<CGS>                             399,248
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     607,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  396,459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 10,264
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (59,837)
<INCOME-TAX>                      (20,950)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (38,887)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (38,887)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.39)

<FN>
<F1> Asset values for the interim period represent net amounts.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### HUNTER v. STATE.

No. 23889.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1948.

No attorney for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Cr. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., both of Houston, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is murder. The punishment assessed is confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of five years.

There are no bills of exception nor is there a statement of facts in the record. In the absence of a bill of exception to the overruling of the motion for a continuance, the matter is not properly before this Court for review. See Branch’s Ann. P.C., Sec. 304, page 183.

The indictment seems to be in due form. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Banks, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rienzi, J.), rendered August 22, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was arrested after he sold two vials of crack cocaine to an undercover police officer. The undercover officer then radioed a description of the defendant to a backup team, which apprehended the defendant within five minutes. Approximately *3Vz*hours later, the undercover *officer*identified the defendant at the police precinct. The defendant argues that both the precinct identification and in-court identifications should have been suppressed as a result of the suggestive showup procedure employed by the police. We disagree. The undercover officer’s viewing of the defendant was for the purpose of assuring that the right man had been arrested and did not constitute an impermissible identification procedure *(see, People v Morales,*37 NY2d 262; *People v Hill,*147 AD2d 500). In addition, the possibility of misidentification was lessened since the undercover officer who made the identification was trained to be both accurate and objective in his observations *(see, People v Wharton,*74 NY2d 921; *People v Hill, supra).*

The defendant argues that he was denied a fair trial when the prosecutor postulated in his summation that the defendant may have made change during other drug sales. This argument was to explain the failure to locate on the defendant the prerecorded money used by the undercover officer to purchase the crack cocaine from the defendant when he was arrested. We find that most of the comments to which the defendant now objects are unpreserved for appellate review due to his failure to object to the remarks at the trial, or his acceptance of the curative instructions given by the trial court *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Williams,*46 NY2d 1070). To the *551extent that the alleged errors are preserved for appellate review, they either did not constitute error, or were harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230). Harwood, J. P., Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code) Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Sterling Bancorp, a New York corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that: The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008
(the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. Dated:
November 7, 2008

/s/ Louis J. CappelliName:   Louis J.
 CappelliTitle:
   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 50