alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 Attachment

Hi Colleen,

I have attached the spreadsheet that you requested containing the emission inputs and modeling results for the Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) analysis for N avajo Generating Station (NGS). If you need anythi ng else, please
let us know.

Thanks,

Grant

--------------------------------------------------- ------ Grant Smedley Manager, Environmental Policy & Innovation Salt River Project Tel: (602) 236-2928 Fax: (602) 236-6690 grant.smedley@srpnet.com

--------------------------------------------------- ------

NGS Modeling Spreadsheet Smedley Grant M

to: Colleen McKaughan 02/28/2012 08:48 AM Cc: Anita Lee, Scott Bohning, Eugene Chen, Barr Kelly J Hide Details From: Smedley Grant M <Grant.Smedley@srpnet.com>

To: Colleen McKaughan/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Anita Lee/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Bohning/R9/USE PA/US@EPA, Eugene Chen/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Barr Kelly J <Kelly.Barr@srpn et.com>

Navajo BART Emissions & Results for Jan 2012 Archiv e.xls 

### Page 1 of 1

4/12/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settings\ALEE07\Local Setti ngs\Temp\notesBAAA25\~web3122.

...
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60342

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES MASON WHITLEY,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:94-CR-133

- - - - - - - - - -

February 22, 1996

Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Mason Whitley appeals his conviction for possession

of cocaine base with intent to distribute it. 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(a)(1). He argues that there was insufficient evidence to

support his conviction and that the district court abused its

discretion in not delivering a proffered jury instruction.

We have reviewed the record and Whitley's contentions and we

find no reversible error. Accordingly, Whitley's conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.
#### OLAN MILLS, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF MAYSVILLE, Kentucky, et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 29, 1954.

*461M. C. Redwine, Jr., Redwine &'Redwine', Winchester, D. Bernard Coughlin, Mays-' ville, for appellant.

M. Hargett, Maysville, for appellees.

' STEWART, Chief Justice.

This action attacks the validity of an ordinance of the City of Maysville, enacted in 1953, by the terms of which that municipality imposed an annual license fee of $35 on any resident, transient or itinerant person, firm or corporation engaging in the ■occupation or profession of commercial photography, or any business related thereto in whole or part, within the corporate limits. The ordinance also imposed an additional license fee of $25 per day on each “outside solicitor or salesperson” and further required an indemnity bond of $1000 of •each person, firm or corporation before so ■engaging in the business above described.

Whether the ordinance can be enforced against the photographers, solicitors, and employees of appellant, Olan Mills, Inc., a Tennessee corporation, is the single issue involved in this appeal. It was claimed below that the ordinance imposes an undue and discriminatory burden upon interstate commerce in violation of Article I, Section 8, Claus'e 3 of the Constitution of the United States, commonly known as the “commerce clause,” and is therefore unenforceable as to ‘appellant, a nonresident corporation doing business in Kentucky. The chancellor refused the 'inju’nctive relief sought by áppellant against appellee to enjoin the enforcement of thé ordinance against it and it's employees. "

The facts in this case, except as to the cities where the business in controversy was undertaken to be. carried oij, .are identical, with those set forth in detail in Olan Mills, Inc., v. City of Elizabethtown, etc., Ky., 269 S.W.2d 201; and Cordell v. Commonwealth, Ky., 254 S.W.2d 484, and reference is made' to these two cases for the . factual back-|, ground applicable to the case at bar.

In the opinion- handed down in the City of Elizabethtown cáse this Court declared, and set forth the reasons why, the tax attempted' to be enforced there, which is the same kind, of tax involved in this.appeal; cannot be imposed upon a nonresident, the reason being that it is a regulation of, and a burden upon,-' interstate commerce which is prohibited by the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution. ......

The City of Elizabethtown case fully discusses and decides- the question before us and we deem it unnecessary to repeat here what was written there, and on the authority of that case we conclude appellant was entitled to the injunctive relief it sought.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed with directions that it be set aside and a rte'w one entered declaring the ordinance void to the extent that it applies to appellant and any nonresident person, firm' or corporation engaged in interstate commerce .in the City of Maysville.

CAMMACK, J., dissenting.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 200 (Monday, October 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26423]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-920-1310-01; WYW142080]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

October 5, 2000.
    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), an 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
lease WYW 142080 for lands in Campbell and Johnson Counties, Wyoming, 
was timely filed and was accompanied by all the required rentals 
accruing from the date of termination.
    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year 
and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively.
    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $158 
to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of 
the lease as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management 
is proposing to reinstate lease WYW142080 effective July 1, 2000, 
subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the 
increased rental and royalty rates cited above.

Theresa M. Stevens,
Acting Chief, Leasable Minerals Section.
[FR Doc. 00-26423 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The inventions listed below are assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and are available for licensing by the Department of the Navy. 

U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/207,891 entitled, “RESOURCE MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY”, filing date: May 25, 2000, Navy Case No. 82185. 

U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/224,381entitled, “PAYLOAD DISPENSING SYSTEM PARTICULARLY SUITED FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES”, filing date: August 8, 2000, Navy Case No. 82210. 

U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/229,063 entitled, “CLOCK SYNCHRONIZATION USING QUANTUM MECHANICAL NON-LOCALITY EFFECTS”, filing date: August 31, 2000, Navy Case No. 82343. 

# ADDRESSES:

Requests for copies of the provisional patent applications cited should be directed to the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Laboratory, Code CD222, 17320 Dahlgren Road, Building 183, Room 015, Dahlgren, VA 22448-5100, and must include the Navy Case number. Interested parties will be required to sign a Confidentiality, Non-Disclosure and Non-Use Agreement before receiving copies of requested patent applications. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James B. Bechtel, Patent Counsel, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Laboratory, Code CD222, 17320 Dahlgren Road, Building 183, Room 015, Dahlgren, VA 22448-5100, telephone (540) 653-8016. 

                            (                            **Authority:**35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404)                        

Dated: September 29, 2000.

J.L. Roth,

Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-26271 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
Exhibit 23.1        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM    We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries for the period ended March 29, 2009, as indicated in our report dated April 29, 2009; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements File No.'s 333-02683, 333-05231, 333-15851, 333-43055, 333-51189, 333-51181, 333-57779, 333-84483 and 333-86492.  We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.   /S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP   Dayton, Ohio April 29, 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RANDY JOSEPH SIMMONS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 191 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit (11)

                        STERLING BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                               March 31,         
                                                         1999            1998   
                                                       ----------     ----------
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>       
Net income                                             $3,464,622     $3,002,965
Less: preferred dividends                                  16,632         12,807
                                                       ----------     ----------
NET INCOME AVAILABLE FOR COMMON SHAREHOLDERS            3,447,990      2,990,158
Add: interest on convertible subordinated debt                 --             -- 
                                                       ----------     ----------
NET INCOME ADJUSTED FOR DILUTED COMPUTATION            $3,447,990     $2,990,158
                                                       ==========     ==========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING              8,184,916      8,218,288
Add dilutive effect of:
   Stock options                                          138,891        200,165
   Convertible preferred stock                            243,929        244,691
                                                       ----------     ----------
ADJUSTED FOR ASSUMED DILUTED COMPUTATION                8,567,736      8,663,144
                                                       ==========     ==========

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE                               $     0.42     $     0.36
                                                       ==========     ==========
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                             $     0.40     $     0.35
                                                       ==========     ==========
</TABLE>


                                       26
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5407 

To suspend temporarily the duty on parts of machines for punching. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. HONDA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on parts of machines for 

punching. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PARTS OF MACHINES FOR PUNCHING. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Parts of machines for 

punching (provided for in 

subheading 8207.30.60) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5407 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-703 Rev. 1, 11/2013



### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 10/3/2014 Sample Number: 143369-001 Date Collected:09/23/2014 08:41 Date Received:9/23/2014 

### WWTP Inlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 209000 10000 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 4000 09/27/2014 

### Sample Number: 143369-002 Date Collected:09/23/2014 08:35 Date Received:9/23/2014 

### Primary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 367 10 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 4 09/27/2014 

### Sample Number: 143369-003 Date Collected:09/23/2014 08:07 Date Received:9/23/2014 

### Primary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 462 10 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 4 09/27/2014 

### Sample Number: 143369-004 Date Collected:09/23/2014 08:28 Date Received:9/23/2014 

### Secondary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 14.2 2 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 0.8 09/27/2014 

### Sample Number: 143369-005 Date Collected:09/23/2014 08:30 Date Received:9/23/2014 

### Secondary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 17.1 2 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 0.8 09/27/2014 

### Sample Number: 143369-006 Date Collected:09/23/2014 08:32 Date Received:9/23/2014 

### WWTP Outlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 15.0 0.5 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 0.2 09/27/2014

Amos Plant, 143369 Page 1 of 2

### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 10/3/2014

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Dave Conover, Senior Chemist Email dpconover@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4219 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4219

Amos Plant, 143369 Page 2 of 2
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5291 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Poly-Pale, 25 KG Bag, China. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. ROE of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Poly-Pale, 25 KG Bag, 

China. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLY-PALE, 25 KG BAG, CHINA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Dimerized gum (100%) 

rosin, catalyzed with sulfuric acid, softening point 

not less than 92 degrees 

centigrade, acid number 

not less than 140 (CAS 

No. 65997–05–9) (provided for in subheading 

3806.90.00) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5291 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 13

- 00010

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF N .L. , L.S., and J.A.T. From the 225th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012

- PA

- 01411 Honorable Richard Garcia , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Delivered and Filed: March 20, 2013
DIS MISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION This is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory Permanency Hearing Order signed December 11, 2012, after a permanency hearing in a suit by the Department of Family and Protective Services seeking termination of the parental rights of app ellant to his child. No final judgment of termination has been entered. The permanency order states that trial is scheduled for May 16, 2013. The Texas Family Code permits a party to appeal “a final order” in a suit affecting the parent

- child relationshi p. T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN
. § 109.002(b) ( West Supp. 2012). The Family Code expressly precludes a n interlocutory appeal from a trial court ’ s temporary orders

. See T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN
. § 105.001(e) (West 2008)

. Accordingly, b ecause it appear ed this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, on January 16, 2013, this court ordered a ppellant to show cause in04

- 13

- 00010

- CV

- 2

- writing why this appeal should not be dismissed. No response has been filed. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for l ack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.A

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2003, of Southern Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John W. Somerhalder II, Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer),
certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                             /s/ John W. Somerhalder II
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             John W. Somerhalder II
                                             Chairman of the Board
                                             (Principal Executive Officer)

                                             May 14, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Southern Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Southern
Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### Jeff HARPER, Appellant, v. Norma Lee SMITH, Appellee. Jeff HARPER, Appellant, v. Lois CAMPBELL, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

April 23, *1954.*

Craft & Stanfill, Hazard, for appellant.

W. M. Melton, Hazard, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Perry Circuit Court in consolidated actions which stem from a collision involving two motor vehicles.

We are affirming the judgment entered in favor of the appellee, Norma Lee Smith, for $1,862.19, and the judgment in favor of appellee, Lois Campbell, for $216, because there was sufficient evidence to submit the cases to the jury, and because we find no error prejudicial to the appellant’s substantial rights.

Wherefore, the motion for an appeal is overruled and each judgment stands affirmed.
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before HOUTZ , MYERS , and KISOR

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Jeffrey D. NTIAMOA Private (E

- 1 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 20 22 00 064

_________________________

Decided: 31 October 2022
Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge s : Keaton H. Harrell (arraignment and motions ) Glen R. Hines (motions) Nicholas S. Henry (trial)

Sentence adjudged 16 November 2021 by a general court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune , North Carolina , consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 345 days , forfeiture of $ 800 .00 pay per month for five months , and a bad

- conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Commander C. Eric Roper , JAGC, USNUnited States v. Ntiamoa , NMCCA No. 202200064 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________

PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant ’s substantial rights occurred. 1
T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.