alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### POLLARD v. STATE.

No. 25213.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1951.

D. F. Sanders, J. A. Veillon, Beaumont, for appellant..

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. : ,

WOODLEY, Commissioner,

Appellant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder with malice, and the jury, rejected his plea for suspension of sentence and assessed his *302punishment at two years.confinement in the penitentiary. ■

Appellant stabbed Helen Johnson, the woman with whom 'he had lived for some two years, twenty times with an ice pick. Her left lung and liver were punctured and other stab wounds were inflicted in the upper part of her chest, abdomen, back and arm.'

Appellant, testifying in his own behalf, denied that he had threatened to kill Helen Johnson, as she testified, or that he intended to do so. He said that they had both been drinking; that Helen was threatening him with the law; that he picked up the ice pick and slapped her, then “blacked out.”

He further testified that they had been getting along all right and had had no trouble. He was unable to further explain why he stabbed her.

In his charge to the jury, the court submitted assault with intent to murder with and 'without malice, and aggravated assault.

Appellant excepted to the. charge submitting assault with intent to murder without malice upon the ground that the burden of proof was placed on the defendant'to prove'that the assault was committed without malice, and further because the court 'fáiled *to*instruct the jury that if they'found the defendant guilty of assault with intent to murder but had a reasonable doubt as to whether it was committed with malice they should give the defendant the benefit of the doubt, and find him guilty of assault with intent to murder without malice.

Following the application of the law of assault with intent to murder with malice, the trial court applied the law of assault with intent to murder without malice to the facts as follows: “But, if from the evidence you believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant, Garfield Pollard, on or about the 25 day of July, 1950, in the County of Jefferson and State of Texas, without malice, as that term has herein-before ¡been defined to you, did assault the said Helen Johnson with intent then and there to kill the said Helen Johnson, you will find the defendant guilty of an assault with intent to murder, and say so by your verdict and assess his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of not less than one nor more than three years, as you may determine and state in your verdict.”

Nowhere in the charge was the jury told that appellant should be given the benefit of any reasonable doubt as to the existence o'f malice.

The omission was called to the court’s attention in a timely manner, and the court erred in failing to amend his charge in this regard. See Richardson v. State, 91 Tex.Cr.R. 318, 239 S.W. 218, 20 A.L.R. 1249; Sparks v. State, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 367, 300 S.W. 938.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### Ex parte Lester Emmett BENNETT.

Nos. 24967, 25004.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 1, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant has in both cases filed a request to withdraw the appeal. The same is hereby granted and, accordingly, each case .is dismissed from the docket of this Court.
M E M O RAN D U M

T o : F il e

F r o m : M e r ed it

h K u r p i u s

, E P A R eg i on I X

, A ir Q ua lit y A na l y s i s O ffi c e

D a t e : M a y

10, 2013

RE : Sou t

h C oa s t P M 2 .5 A m

b i en t A ir M on it o ri ng D a t a C o m p l e t ene ss

C o m p l e t e Q ua r t e r s * f

or P M2. 5

S it e A Q S I D C o m p l e t e Q ua r t e r s * f or P M2.5 ( μg /m 3 )

200 2 200 3 200 4 200 5 200 6 200 7 200 8 200 9 201 0 201 1 201 2

A z u s a 06037000 2 4 3 2 2 2 3 4 3 1 4 4

B u r ban k

–

Pa l m A v e

. 06037100 2 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4

L A

– N o rt h

M a i n 06037110 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4

R e s ed a 06037120 1 4 4 3 3 2 2 4 4 3 4 4

L y n w ood 06037130 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 3

C o m p t on 06037130 2 0 4 4 4 4

P i co R i v e r a

#1 06037160 1 4 4 4 1

P i co R i v e r a

#2 06037160 2 1 4 3 4 4 4 4 4

Pa s ad e n a 06037200 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 2

L on g B eac h 06037400 2 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4

L on g B each

– P CH 06037400 4 2 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4

A nahe i m 06059000 7 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4

M i s s i o n

V i e j o 06059202 2 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4

R i v e rsi de 06065100 3 4 4 4 3 4 2 4 4 4 4 3

R ub i dou x 06065800 1 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4

M i r a L o m a 06065800 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 4

O n t a r i o 06071002 5 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4

Fon t a na 06071200 2 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4

B i g B ea r 06071800 1 3 4 3 2 1 3 4 4 3 4 3

San

B e r n a r d i no 06071900 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 2 4

* A qua rt e r i s con s i de r ed c o m p l e t e if da t a cap t u r e r a t e s a r e a t l ea s t

75 %

. Se e 40 C F R

pa rt 50, ap p end i x N

, s e c ti on 4.0

.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5428 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5428

      To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women's footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

Mr. Huelskamp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women's footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN'S FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Other footwear      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          with outer soles                                                  12/31/2015
                          and uppers of
                          rubber or
                          plastics, the
                          foregoing for
                          women, other than
                          house slippers,
                          work footwear,
                          tennis shoes,
                          basketball shoes,
                          gym shoes,
                          training shoes,
                          and the like
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          6402.99.31)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### JORDAN v. STATE.

No. 25976.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 29, 1952.

*160No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for possessing policy books and paraphernalia designed and adaptable for use in connection with a policy game, as denounced by Sec. 2 of Chap. 434, Acts of the Regular Session of the 52nd Legislature, in 1951, and appearing as Sec. 2 of Art. 642c, Vernon’s Penal Code. The punishment was assessed at thirty days’ confinement in jail.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22-0509

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ROBERT WINKOWITSCH

Appellee,

-vsGLACIER ELECTRIC 

COOPERATIVE, INC.,

Appellant.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ORDER GRANTING MOTION 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

FILING TRANSCRIPTS ON 

APPEAL

Pursuant to the Appellant’s Rule 9(4) M.R.App.P. Motion for Extension of

Time for Filing Transcripts on Appeal, as accompanied by the Declaration of

Court Reporter Josie Loney setting forth in detail why the transcript has not been

provided and why the additional time sought is needed, and good cause

appearing, the Appellant and Court Reporter are given an extension of time until

March 1, 2023, to serve and file the transcripts request on appeal herein.

DATED this day of January, 2023.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 27 2023

01/27/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0509
LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Structured Asset Securities Corporation, as depositor (the "Depositor"), for transactions under those certain Pooling and Servicing Agreements as listed in Exhibit A (the "PSA"), does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee under the PSA ("LaSalle"), as its true and lawful attorney-in-fact for the limited purpose of preparing, executing and filing, in the Depositor's name, SEC Form 10-K, and any amendments thereto, with all required attachments and any other items specifically provided in the PSA to be executed and filed by LaSalle on behalf of the Depositor.	

The Depositor hereby undertakes to ratify and confirm any and all action that LaSalle may do or cause to be done within the scope of the authority conferred hereby.  LaSalle is authorized to deliver copies of this Limited Power of Attorney to third parties, who may rely hereon.

This Limited Power of Attorney shall be governed by the laws of the State of Illinois and shall be irrevocable from the date hereof and shall remain in full force and effect until due written notice of its revocation is given by the undersigned to LaSalle by registered mail.

 

Dated: March 31, 2003	

					STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION			

					By: /s/ Tracy Dembicer

					Title: Authorized Signatory

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

 

STATE OF 	New York	)

		            	)  ss:

COUNTY OF 	   New York	)

 

	On the 31 day of March,  2003, before me, a notary public in and for said County and State, came Tracy Dembicer to me known to be the Authorized Signatory of Structured Asset Securities Corp. (the "Corporation"), who acknowledged that (s)he signed the foregoing instrument in the name and on behalf of the Corporation as its voluntary act and deed, pursuant to authority duly conferred upon him/her as an officer of the Corporation.

 

						/s/ Edna Lanahan
						Notary Public
**EDNA LANAHAN

Notary Public, State of New York

No. 01LA6070349

Qualified in New York County

Commission Expires March 4, 2006**
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Melvyn Knigin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Movie Star, Inc.;

2. based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. the registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) [intentionally omitted];

     (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. the registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2007

                                        /s/ Melvyn Knigin
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Melvyn Knigin
                                        Chief Executive Officer
```
EXHIBIT 32.02

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
April  1,  2006  of  Cytation  Corporation  (the  "Company"),  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
G.  Masters,  Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
Rule  13a-14(b)  or  15d-14(b)  of  the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best  of  my  knowledge:

1.   the Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

2.   the information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/  Charles  G.  Masters
 -------------------------
Charles  G.  Masters
Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer

Date: May 22, 2006


A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the amendment No. 1 to the annual report of Whitestone REIT, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James C. Mastandrea, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/ James C. MastandreaJames C. MastandreaChairman and Chief Executive Officer





Date: April 1, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5673 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5673

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Reactive Blue 235.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Reactive Blue 235.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REACTIVE BLUE 235.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.47 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to reactive blue 235) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5677 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Vat Black 25. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Vat Black 

25. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VAT BLACK 25. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.45 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Vat Black 25) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5677 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
10.9


 


This
loan agreement (this “Agreement”) is made on July 23, 2021 by and between 2622325 Ontario Limited, an Ontario corporation
(“Lender”), and Slinger Bag Inc., a Nevada corporation (together with its affiliates, “Borrower”).


 


WHEREAS,
Borrower requires a further infusion of U.S. $500,000 in cash (the “Loan”) in order to finance its operations and Lender
wishes to provide the Loan, subject to the terms and on the conditions of this Agreement;


 


Now,
therefore, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements of the Parties hereinafter set forth, it is hereby
agreed by and between the Parties hereto as follows:


 


1.
Loan. Lender hereby agrees to lend FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND USD ($500,000) in immediately available funds to the Borrower
on July 23, 2021 by wiring the same in accordance with instructions to be provided by the Borrower separately. Borrower agrees to accept
$500,000 as a loan to be repaid within 30 days of receipt of the Loan proceeds or such other date as may be accepted by the Lender in
writing (including by email). The Loan shall bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum on the outstanding amount until repaid in full.
Any payment of cash to be made by Borrower to Lender shall be applied first to accrued, but unpaid, interest and second to the outstanding
principal.


 


2.
Dividends or Distributions. The Parties agree that Borrower shall not be permitted to declare, make or pay any dividend or distribution
unless and until the Loan is repaid in full.


 


3.
Costs and Fees. Each Party will bear its own costs in connection with the entry into this Agreement and any payments to be made
or received hereunder.


 


4.
Amendments and Assignments. This Agreement may not be amended or assigned without the written consent of all Parties.


 


5.
Further Assurances. Each party hereto agrees to execute, on request, all other documents and instruments as the other party shall
reasonably request, and to take any actions, which are reasonably required or desirable to carry out obligations imposed under, and affect
the purposes of, this Agreement.


 


6.
Governing Law and Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed by the substantive law of the State of New York, without application
of any conflict of laws principle that would require the application of the law of any other jurisdiction


 




    	 



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 


	Slinger
    Bag Inc.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Mike Ballardie	 
	 	Mike Ballardie 	 
	 	Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	I have authority to bind the corporation	 
	 	 	 
	Agreed
    and accepted: 	 
	 	 
	2622325 Ontario Limited	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/
    Elisha Kalfa	 
	Name: 
    	Elisha
    Kalfa	 
	Title:
    	Authorized
    Signatory