alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 159 meeting to be held October 24-27, 2000, starting at 9 a.m. each day. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

The agenda will include:

## Specific Working Group Sessions

### October 24

Working Group (WG-1), Third Civil Frequency and WG-2C, GPS/Inertial.

### October 25

9:00-12:00

WG-4, Precision Landing Guidance (GPS/LAAS) and WG-6, GPS/Interference;

1:30-4:30

WG-2, GPS/WAAS

SC-159 AD Hoc, Recommendation and WG5, Surface Surveillance

### October 26

WG-2, GPS/WAAS

WG-4, Precision Landing Guidance (GPS/LAAS) and WG-6, GPS/Interference

## October 27: Plenary Session

(1) Introductory Remarks; 

(2) Approve Summary of Previous Meeting;

(3) Review Working Group (WG) Progress and Identify Issues for Resolution:

(a) GPS/3rd Civil Frequency (WG-1);

(b) GPS/WAAS (WG-2);

(c) GPS/GLONASS (WG-2A);

(d) GPS/Inertial (WG-2C);

(e) GPS/Precision Landing Guidance (WG-4);

(f) GPS/Airport Surface Surveillance (WG-5);

(g) GPS Interference (WG-6);

(h) SC-159 Ad Hoc;

(4) Review of EUROCAE Activities;

(5) Review/Approve Final Draft, SC-159, Response to the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Recommendation Regarding Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring;

(6) Assignment/Review of Future Work;

(7) Other Business;

(8) Date and Location of Next Meeting;

(9) Closing.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, at (202) 833-9339 (phone), (202) 833-9434 (fax). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on October 2, 2000.

Janice L. Peters,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 00-26017  Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
UN I TED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGIO N S

Ms. Deidra Johnson Attorney Supervisor 1445 ROSS AVENUE , SU IT E 1200 DALLAS TX 75202-2733 

# JAN 14 2015

Office of the Secretary, Legal Division Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 4302 Baton Roug e, LA 708 2 I
- 4302 RE: A dditi o nal U.S. Environm e ntal Protectio n Agency (EPA ) Comme nts on Proposed Re visions to the Louisiana Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permitting Pro gram (AQ349 ) Dear Ms. John son : Thank you for considering the EPA's comme nts on AQ349, submitte.d by me on December 2, 201 4. Upon further review and discussion w ithin our office s, the EP A needs to provide an additional comment that i s c ritical to the rul e making. Pl e ase con sider the e ncl osed comment as a supplem ent to our initial comme nts from December 2, 2014. As a lways, we look forward to working with you in the upcoming year as you addre ss our concerns. Please note that o ur comments today do not constitute final determinations concerning approvability of the revisions to the L ouisian a PSD program or the State Implementation Plan. If you have any qu e stions about the EPA's revi ew of your proposed rulemakin g, please feel free to contact m e at (2 14) 665-6435 or contact Ms. Adina Wiley of m y staff at (2 14) 665-2 11 5.

Enclosure cc: Mr . Bryan John ston Sincere ly , 

# £/ 9:- ffl\- l,-· Jeff Robin so n Ch ief Air Permit s Sectio n

Louisiana Dep artment of Environmental Qu ality

Internet Address (UR L) • http :/ /www . epa . gov / region6 

# -

Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled PaperEnclosure The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) is proposing to remove the signi ficant mo nitoring co ncentration (SMC) fo r PM2 .s emissions at Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC) 33: III.509(1 )(5)(a) to be consistent with the changes the EPA has made to the federal PSD program as a result of the vacatur of that provision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on January 22,20 1 3, in Sierra Club v. EPfj., 705 F.3d 458. However, unlike the changes to the fed era l program requirements at 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 51.166(i)(5)(1 )(c) whic h set the PM2 . s SMC to 0 )..l g/m 3 , the LDEQ has proposed to delete the PM2.s SMC entirely. This proposed deletion will result in an application contrary to the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the inte nt of the EPA's changes to 40 CFR 51.166(i)(5)(i)(c). When read in concert with the existing requirements of the LDEQ's PSD program at LAC 33:III.509(1)(5)(c), the LDEQ PSD program could require no amb ient moriitoring for emissions of PM2.s ; whereas the federal PSD program now requires that any source or modification with emissions ofPM2 .s greater than 0 )..lg/m3 conduct ambient monitorin g for PM2.s. To maintain consistency with th e CAA, the EPA recommends that the LDEQ should revise LAC 33:III.509(I)(5)(a) to set the PM2.s SMC at 0 !lglm3, rather than deleting the provision.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 18, 2017

No. 04-17-00430-CR

San Juan GARCIA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR3674

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Carol N. Castillo’s notification of late record is hereby GRANTED. The reporter’s record 

is due on or before October 24, 2017.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of September, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a § 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND § 

DEVELOPMENT, § 

 § 

 Plaintiff, § 

 § 

 v. § 

 § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-543-ADA 

HUAWEI INVESTMENT & HOLDING § 

CO., LTD., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES § 

CO., LTD., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES § 

USA INC., HUAWEI DEVICE CO. LTD. § 

(f/k/a HUAWEI DEVICE (DONGGUAN) § 

CO.), HUAWEI DEVICE (SHENZHEN) § 

CO., LTD. (f/k/a HUAWEI DEVICE CO., § 

LTD.), HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC. § 

 § 

 Defendants. § 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

 Defendant Huawei Technologies USA Inc. (“Huawei USA”) through the undersigned 

counsel, respectfully moves the Court to extend the time for Huawei USA to answer, move, or 

otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. 1) until and including September 15, 2020. 

In exchange for executing a waiver of service for Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Plaintiff 

agreed to not oppose a motion to extend the deadline of Huawei USA to respond to the Complaint 

to September 15, 2020. See Dkt. 11 (waiver of service resulting in September 15, 2020 answer 

deadline). Thus, the requested extension will not cause delay in this action but, instead, greater 

efficiency for the Court and all parties. The undersigned counsel conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel, 

and Plaintiff does not oppose the requested extension. 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00543-ADA Document 16 Filed 08/10/20 Page 1 of 2
 2 

Dated: August 10, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Jason W. Cook 

Jason W. Cook 

Texas Bar No. 24028537 

Shaun W. Hassett 

Texas Bar No. 24074372 

MCGUIREWOODS LLP 

2000 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1400 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Telephone: (214) 932-6400 

Facsimile: (214) 932-6499 

jcook@mcguirewoods.com 

shasset@mcguirewoods.com 

Tyler T. VanHoutan 

Texas Bar No. 24033290 

MCGUIREWOODS LLP 

600 Travis St., Suite 7500 

Houston, TX 77002 

Telephone: (713) 571-9191 

Facsimile: (713) 571-9652 

tvanhoutan@mcguirewoods.com 

Counsel for Defendant Defendants Huawei 

Technologies Co., Ltd. and Huawei Technologies 

USA Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule CV-5, I hereby certify 

that on August 10, 2020, all counsel of record who have appeared in this case are being served 

with a copy of the foregoing via the Court’s CM/ECF system 

 /s/ Jason W. Cook 

 Jason W. Cook 

Case 6:20-cv-00543-ADA Document 16 Filed 08/10/20 Page 2 of 2
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5692 

To extend the suspension of duty on Interam mats. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. PAULSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Interam mats. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INTERAM MATS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.72 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Interam mats) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------



              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paragon Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald J. Semanick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                            /s/ Ronald J. Semanick
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Ronald J. Semanick
                            Chief Financial Officer and Vice President - Finance
                              and Treasurer
                            November 13, 2006
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Paradise Living Inc and Mary Arthur v. Blackburne & Brown

Mortgage Fund I

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00194

- CV

Trial court case number: 2017

- 56890

Trial court: 11th District Court of Harris County

On September 23, 2018, a ppellants filed a second motion requesting that we further extend

the deadline for filing their brief to September 23, 2018. Appellants failed to file a brief with their

motion and the extensio n date they request, September 23, 2018, passed without a brief being filed.

Accordingly, the motion is DENIED. Unless appellants file their brief within 10 days of this order,

the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting individually

Date: September 2 7 , 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5389 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5389

    To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Zinc sulfide, copper 
                            chloride doped.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Ms. Fudge introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Zinc sulfide, copper 
                            chloride doped.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ZINC SULFIDE, COPPER CHLORIDE DOPED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Zinc sulfide,       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          copper chloride                                                   12/31/2015
                          doped (CAS No.
                          68611-70-1)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3206.42.0000)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2002, of Southern Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                          /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Greg G. Gruber
                                          Senior Vice President,
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)

                                          November 13, 2002
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________
No. 00-50012 Summary Calendar

____________________ MICHAEL PUMMILL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS, NEW MEXICO & OKLAHOMA COACHES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(EP-99-CV-182-F)

_________________________________________________________________ June 6, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In con testing the F E D
. R. C IV
. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his
action against his employer for breach of a collective bargaining

agreement, Michael Pummill asks only that we reverse Supreme Court
precedent holding that the applicable statute of limitations is six

months. S ee DelCostello v. International Bhd. of T eamsters , 462

U.S. 151, 169 (1983). But, as Pummill concedes, we cannot do so.

No authority need to cited for the rule that s uch precedent is
binding on this court.- 2 -

For the reasons stated by the district court, P ummill v.

Texas, New Mexico & Oklahoma Coaches, Inc. , No. EP:9 9-CA-0182-F,
slip op. at 2-5 (W.D. Tex. 1 Dec. 1999), the judgment is

AFFIRMED

.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                         5

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                            268,053
<SECURITIES>                                      497,328
<RECEIVABLES>                                     933,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                      450,677
<INVENTORY>                                     2,760,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,909,624
<PP&E>                                          9,688,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                  6,267,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  9,106,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,298,989
<BONDS>                                         2,798,631
<COMMON>                                        2,806,482
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   -
<PREFERRED>                                             -
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,202,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    9,106,336
<SALES>                                         3,727,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,727,046
<CGS>                                           1,696,669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,568,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        -
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        -
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 66,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (580,049)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (196,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (384,049)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          -
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         -
<CHANGES>                                               -
<NET-INCOME>                                     (384,049)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.15)



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Frederick’s of Hollywood Group Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 24, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  
         The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





2.   
        The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.





Date:  June
      8, 2010
              /s/ Thomas J. LynchThomas
      J. LynchChief
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Executive OfficerDate:  June
      8, 2010
              /s/ Thomas RendeThomas
      RendeChief
      Financial Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting Officer
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-12770

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 0:13-cv-60948-DLB

SERGE BRALO, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee

 Cross Appellant,

 versus

SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellant

 Cross Appellee.

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(March 30, 2015)

Case: 14-12770 Date Filed: 03/30/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Before HULL and DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and BOWEN,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Spirit Airlines, Inc. appeals the denial of its Motion for New Trial 

as well as the partial denial of its Motion for Remittitur or, in the Alternative, 

Motion for New Trial as to excessive damages. Plaintiff Serge Bralo cross-appeals 

the district court’s denial of Bralo’s post-trial Motion for frontpay. After careful 

review of the briefs and record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no 

reversible error in the rulings of the district court. And we affirm the district 

court’s entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiff Bralo against the defendant Spirit 

Airlines, Inc. in the amount of $453,201.01, which includes: (1) $143,201.01 in 

back pay and prejudgment interest; (2) $10,000 in compensatory damages; and (3) 

$300,000 in punitive damages. Post-judgment interest shall accrue pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1961(a).

AFFIRMED.

 *

Honorable Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., United States District Judge for the Southern District 

of Georgia, sitting by designation.

 

Case: 14-12770 Date Filed: 03/30/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit
      23.2




CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
      333-119222 on Form S-8 of our report dated August 28, 2006, relating to the
      financial statements of Open Energy Corporation (formerly known as Barnabus
      Energy, Inc.) (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006, appearing
      in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company filed with the SEC on
      September 1, 2006.





/s/
      PETERSON & CO., LLP





San
      Diego, California


September
      1, 2006