Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 199 / Friday, October 13, 2000 / Notices 60975

known individuals were identified. The

66 associated funerary objects include a

stone bead, bear claws, bone awls or

hairpins, a bone tube fragment, a

perforated bone artifact fragment, a

quartz crystal, and flaked stone artifacts.

Based on the condition of the remains

and material culture found with the

burials, these individuals have been

identified as Native American. The

remains were determined to date to the

late prehistoric period. Ethnographic,

historical, and geographic information

establishes that the Konkow Maidu

people were occupants of the region at

the time of contact and European

colonization. Oral history of the Maidu

Indians also indicates they were in the

region prior to contact and European

colonization.

Based on the above-mentioned

information, officials of the Mendocino

National Forest, USDA-Forest Service

have determined that, pursuant to 43

CFR 10.2 (d)(1), the human remains

listed above represent the physical

remains of four individuals of Native

American ancestry. Officials of the

Mendocino National Forest, USDAForest Service also have determined

that, pursuant to 43 CFR 10.2 (d)(2), the

66 objects listed above are reasonably

believed to have been placed with or

near individual human remains at the

time of death or later as part of the death

rite or ceremony. Lastly, officials of the

Mendocino National Forest, USDAForest Service have determined that,

pursuant to 43 CFR 10.2 (e), there is a

relationship of shared group identity

that can be reasonably traced between

these Native American human remains

and associated funerary objects and the

Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians

of California; Enterprise Rancheria of

Maidu Indians of California; Mechoopda

Indian Tribe of Chico Rancheria,

California; Mooretown Rancheria of

Maidu Indians of California; and Round

Valley Indian Tribe of the Round Valley

Reservation, California.

This notice has been sent to officials

of the Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu

Indians of California; Enterprise

Rancheria of Maidu Indians of

California; Mechoopda Indian Tribe of

Chico Rancheria, California; Mooretown

Rancheria of Maidu Indians of

California; and Round Valley Indian

Tribe of the Round Valley Reservation,

California. Representatives of any other

Indian tribe that believes itself to be

culturally affiliated with these human

remains and associated funerary objects

should contact James D. Fenwood,

Forest Supervisor, Mendocino National

Forest, 825 North Humboldt Avenue,

Willows, CA, telephone (530) 934–3316,

before November 13, 2000. Repatriation

of the human remains and associated

funerary objects to the Mechoopda

Indian Tribe of Chico Rancheria,

California may begin after that date if no

additional claimants come forward.

Dated: October 5, 2000.

John Robbins,

Assistant Director, Cultural Resources

Stewardship and Partnerships.

[FR Doc. 00–26346 Filed 10–12–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–F

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731–TA–556 (Review)]

Dynamic Random Access Memory

Semiconductors of One Megabit and

Above From Korea

AGENCY: United States International

Trade Commission.

ACTION: Termination of five-year review.

SUMMARY: The subject five-year review

was initiated in November 1999 to

determine whether revocation of the

antidumping duty order on dynamic

random access memory semiconductors

of one megabit and above from Korea

would be likely to lead to continuation

or recurrence of dumping and of

material injury to a domestic industry.

On October 5, 2000, the Department of

Commerce published notice that it was

revoking the order ‘‘[b]ecause no

domestic interested party is now

participating in this sunset review’’ (65

FR 59391). Accordingly, pursuant to

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930

(19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)), the subject review

is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 5, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bonnie Noreen (202–205–3167), Office

of Investigations, U.S. International

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that

information on this matter can be

obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility

impairments who will need special

assistance in gaining access to the

Commission should contact the Office

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may also be obtained by

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov).

Authority: This review is being terminated

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to

section 207.69 of the Commission’s rules (19

CFR 207.69).

Dated: October 6, 2000.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–26277 Filed 10–12–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7010–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337–TA–438]

In the Matter of Certain Plastic Molding

Machines With Control Systems

Having Programmable Operator

Interfaces Incorporating General

Purpose Computers, and Components

Thereof; Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a

complaint was filed with the U.S.

International Trade Commission on

September 8, 2000, under section 337 of

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Milacron Inc.

of Cincinnati, Ohio. Supplements to the

complaint were filed on September 25

and 27, 2000. The complaint, as

supplemented, alleges violations of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

and the sale within the United States

after importation of certain plastic

molding machines with control systems

having programmable operator

interfaces incorporating general purpose

computers, and components thereof, by

reason of infringement of claims 1–4

and 9–13 of U.S. Letters Patent

5,062,052, as amended by

Reexamination Certificate B1 5,062,052.

The complaint further alleges that an

industry in the United States exists as

required by subsection (a)(2) of section

337.

The complainant requests that the

Commission institute an investigation

and, after the investigation, issue a

permanent exclusion order and a

permanent cease and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint and

supplements, except for any

confidential information contained

therein, are available for inspection

during official business hours (8:45 a.m.

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Room

112, Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone

202–205–2000. Hearing-impaired

individuals are advised that information

on this matter can be obtained by

contacting the Commission’s TDD

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons

60976 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 199 / Friday, October 13, 2000 / Notices

with mobility impairments who will

need special assistance in gaining access

to the Commission should contact the

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may be obtained by

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steven A. Glazer, Esq., Office of Unfair

Import Investigations, U.S. International

Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–

2577.

Authority: The authority for institution of

this investigation is contained in section 337

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10

(2000).

Scope of Investigation

Having considered the complaint, the

U.S. International Trade Commission,

on October 6, 2000, ordered that—

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, an investigation be instituted

to determine:

(a) Whether there is a violation of

subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the

importation into the United States, the

sale for importation, or the sale within

the United States after importation of

certain plastic molding machines with

control systems having programmable

operator interfaces incorporating general

purpose computers, or components

thereof, by reason of infringement of

claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, or 13 of

U.S. Letters Patent 5,062,052, as

amended by Reexamination Certificate

B1 5,062,052, and whether there exists

an industry in the United States as

required by subsection (a)(2) of section

337.

(2) For the purpose of the

investigation so instituted, the following

are hereby named as parties upon which

this notice of investigation shall be

served:

(a) The complainant is Milacron Inc.,

2090 Florence Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio

45206.

(b) The respondents are the following

companies alleged to be in violation of

section 337, and are the parties upon

which the complaint is to be served:

Ube Industries, Ltd., Tokyo Head Office,

Seavans North Bldg., 1–2–1, Shibaura,

Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan 140–8449

Ube Machinery, Inc., 5700 S. State

Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108

(c) Steven A. Glazer, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, S.W., Room 401–K, Washington,

D.C. 20436, who shall be the

Commission investigative attorney,

party to this investigation; and

(3) For the investigation so instituted,

the Honorable Sidney Harris is

designated as the presiding

administrative law judge.

Responses to the complaint and the

notice of investigation must be

submitted by the named respondents in

accordance with section 210.13 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a) of the

Commission’s Rules, such responses

will be considered by the Commission

if received not later than 20 days after

the date of service by the Commission

of the complaint and the notice of

investigation. Extensions of time for

submitting responses to the complaint

will not be granted unless good cause

therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely

response to each allegation in the

complaint and in this notice may be

deemed to constitute a waiver of the

right to appear and contest the

allegations of the complaint and this

notice, and to authorize the

administrative law judge and the

Commission, without further notice to

the respondent, to find the facts to be as

alleged in the complaint and this notice

and to enter both an initial

determination and a final determination

containing such findings, and may

result in the issuance of a limited

exclusion order or a cease and desist

order or both directed against such

respondent.

Issued: October 6, 2000.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–26278 Filed 10–12–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Manufacturer of Controlled

Substances; Notice of Application

Pursuant to section 1301.33(a) of Title

21 of the Code of Federal Regulations

(CFR), this is notice that on August 11,

2000, B.I. Chemical, Inc., 2820 N.

Normandy Drive, Petersburg, Virginia

23805, made application by renewal to

the Drug Enforcement Administration

(DEA) for registration as a bulk

manufacturer of the basic classes of

controlled substances listed below:

Drug Schedule

Amphetamine (1100) .................... II

Methadone (9250) ........................ II

Methadone-intermediate (9254) ... II

Drug Schedule

Levo-alphacetylmethadol (LAAM)

(9648).

II

The firm plans to bulk manufacture

the listed controlled substances for

formulation into finished

pharmaceuticals.

Any other such applicant and any

person who is presently registered with

DEA to manufacture such substance

may file comments or objections to the

issuance of the proposed registration.

Any such comments or objections

may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to

the Deputy Assistant Administrator,

Office of Diversion Control, Drug

Enforcement Administration, United

States Department of Justice,

Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA

Federal Register Representative (CCR),

and must be filed no later than

December 12, 2000.

Dated: September 28, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement

Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–26370 Filed 10–12–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–09–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Importation of Controlled Substances;

Notice of Application

Pursuant to Section 1008 of the

Controlled Substances Import and

Export Act (21 U.S.C. 958(I)), the

Attorney General shall, prior to issuing

a registration under this Section to a

bulk manufacturer of a controlled

substance in Schedule I or II and prior

to issuing a regulation under Section

1002(a) authorizing the importation of

such a substance, provide

manufacturers holding registrations for

the bulk manufacture of the substance

and opportunity for a hearing.

Therefore, in accordance with Section

1301.34 of Title 21, Code of Federal

Regulations (CFR), notice is hereby

given that on August 11, 2000, B.I.

Chemical, Inc., 2820 N. Normandy

Drive, Petersburg, Virginia 23805, made

application by renewal to the Drug

Enforcement Administration to be

registered as an importer of

phenylacetone (8501), a basic class of

controlled substance listed in Schedule

II.

The firm plans to import the

phenylacetone for the bulk manufacture

of amphetamine.

Any manufacturer holding, or

applying for, registration as a bulk