# Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District

Final 

# Staff Report

Rescis s ion of

Rule 1110 Emissions from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (Demonstration)

Adopted on January 15 , 201 3

43301 D IVISION 

### S T



### ., S UITE 

### 206,

L ANCASTER



### , C ALIFORNIA 

### 93535

- 4649

P HONE 

### (661) 723

- 8070

FAX (661) 723

- 3450This page intentionally left blank.AVAQMD Rule 1110 TC

- 1

Final Staff Report , 01/15/13 

### STAFF REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rule 1110

- Emissions from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (Demonstration)

I. PURPOSE OF STAFF REPORT

................................ ................................ ........................... 1

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

................................ ................................ ................................ .... 1

III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION

................................ ................................ ............................ 2

IV. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST

................................ ................................ .......... 3

V. DISCUSSION OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

................................ ................................ ... 4

A. REQUIRED ELEMENTS/FINDINGS

................................ ................................ .......... 4 1. State Findings Required for Adoption of Rules & Regulations

...................... 4 a. Necessity

................................ ................................ .............................. 4 b. Authority

................................ ................................ .............................. 4 c. Clarity

................................ ................................ ................................ .. 4 d. Consistency

................................ ................................ .......................... 4

e. Non

- duplication

................................ ................................ ................... 5

f. Reference

................................ ................................ .............................. 5 g. Publi c Notice & Comment, Public Hearing

................................ ........ 5 2. Federal Elements (SIP Submittals, Other Federal Submittals)

........................ 5 a. Satisfaction of Underlying Federal Requirements

............................... 5

b. Public Notice and Comment

................................ ................................ 5 c. Availability of Document

................................ ................................ .... 5 d. Notice to Specified Entities

................................ ................................ . 6 e. Public Hearing

................................ ................................ ..................... 6 f. Legal Authority to Adopt and Implement

................................ ............ 6 g. Applicable State Laws and Regulations Were Followed

.................... 6

B. WRITTEN ANALYSIS OF EXISTING REQUIREMENTS

................................ ........ 6

C. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

................................ ................................ .............................. 6

1. General

................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 6

2. Incremental Cost Effectiveness

................................ ................................ ....... 7

D. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS (CEQA)

................................ ................................ .. 7

E. SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

................................ ................. 7 1. Potential Environmental Impacts

................................ ................................ ..... 7 2. Mitigation of Impacts

................................ ................................ ...................... 7 3. Alternative Methods of Compliance

................................ ................................ 7TC

- 2 AVAQMD Rule 1110 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 F. PUBLIC REVIEW

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 8

VI. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION

................................ ................................ ............................... 8

A. SOURCE DESCRIPTION

................................ ................................ ............................. 8

B. EMISSIONS

................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 8

C. CONTR OL REQUIREMENTS

................................ ................................ ..................... 8

D. PROPOSED RULE SUMMARY

................................ ................................ .................. 8

E. 110(l) ANALYSIS

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 8

E. SIP HISTORY

................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 9

1. SIP History

................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 9 2. SIP Analysis

................................ ................................ ................................ ... 10

Appendix A

– Rule 1110 Iterated Version

................................ ................................ ................. A

- 1

Appendix B

- Public Notice Documents

................................ ................................ ..................... B

- 1

Appendix C

- Public Comments and Responses

................................ ................................ ......... C

- 1

Appendix D

- California Environmental Quality Act Documentation

................................ ....... D

- 1

Appendix E

- Bibliography

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... E

- 1AVAQMD Rule 1110 1
Final Staff Report, 07 / 30 /13 

### STAFF REPORT

Rule 1110

- Emissions from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (Demonstration)

I. PURPOSE OF STAFF REPORT

A staff report serves several discrete purposes. Its primary purpose is to provide a summary and background material to the members of the Governing Board. This allows the members of the Governing Boar d to be fully informed before making any required decision. It also provides the documentation necessary for the Governing Board to make any findings, which are required by law to be made prior to the approval or adoption of a document. In addition, a st aff report ensures that the correct procedures and proper documentation for approval or adoption of a document have been performed. Finally, the staff report provides evidence for defense against legal challenges regarding the propriety of the approval or adoption of the document.

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

On July 1, 1997 the Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District (AVAPCD) was created pursuant to statute (former H&S Code §40106, A.B. 266

- Knight Ch. 542, statutes of 1996) and assumed all air pollution control responsibilities from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for the area of Los Angeles County outside the South Coast Air Basin. The SCAQMD rules in effect within the jurisdiction of the AVAPCD remained in effect until the AVAPCD Governing Board superceded, amended, or rescinded them. On January 1, 2002 the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD) was created pursuant to statute (H&S Code §41300 et seq.) to replace the AVA PCD. Once again the rules in effect at the time of the change remained in effect until the AVAQMD Governing Board superceded, amended or rescinded them. SCAQMD adopted Rule 1110 on November 6, 1981, and is the effective rule in the AVAQMD Rule Book

Rule 1110

- Emissions From Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (Demonstration) was adopted by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on November 6, 1981 to set up a demonstration program to collect emission s data for SCAQMD Rule 1110.1

- Emissio ns from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines. The SCAQMD demonstration program was completed on or about November 1991. This was prior to the formation of the Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District on 7/1/1997. Rule 1110 was subsequently resci nded by the SCAQMD on November 14,

1997. Due to the provisions of the implementing statute and the subsequent statutory creation of the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District the rule remained in the AVAQMD rule book though it was inapplicable du e to the termination of the program and the fact that none of the program engines were located within what is now the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD. The AVAQMD is proposing to rescind this rule due to its inapplicability

.

Rule 1110 is a State Implementation Plan (SIP) rule. Removal from the SIP will not cause any

increase in emissions since the demonstration program was completed prior to the formation of the AVAQMD and the rule is inapplicable

.2 AVAQMD Rule 1110 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends that the Governing Board of the AVAQMD adopt, after conducting a public hearing, a resolution approving the rescission of Rule 1110

- Emissions from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (Demonstration)

.

The Governing Board of the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District rescinded Rule 1110 on January 15, 2013.AVAQMD Rule 1110 3
Final Staff Report, 07 / 30 /13 IV. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS C HECKLIST

The findings and analysis as indicated below are required for the procedurally cor rect rescission of

Rule 1110

- Emissions from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (Demonstration)

. Each item is discussed, if applicable, in Section V below. Copies of documents are included in the appropriate Appendix.

FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR

RULES & REGULATIONS

X Necessity

X Authority

X Clarity

X Consistency

X Non

- duplication

X Reference

X Public Notice & Comment

X Public Hearing

REQUIREMENTS FOR STATE

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN SUBMISSION (SIP):

X Public Notice & Comment

X Availability of Document

X Notice to Specified Entities (State, Air Districts, USEPA, Other States)

X Publ ic Hearing

X Legal Authority to adopt and implement the document.

X Applicable State laws and regulations were followed. ELEMENTS OF A FEDERAL

SUBMISSION

N/A Elements as set forth in applicable Federal law or regulations.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT REQUIREMENTS (CEQA):

N/A Ministerial Action

X Exemption

N/A Negative Declaration

N/A Environmental Impact Report

X Appropriate findings, if necessary.

X Public Notice & Comment

SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL

A NALYSIS (RULES &

REGULATIONS ONLY):

X Environmental impacts of compliance.

N/A Mitigation of impacts.

N/A Alternative methods of compliance.

OTHER:

N/A Written analysis of existing air pollution control requirements

N/A Economic Analysis

X Public Review4 AVAQMD Rule 1113 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /2013 V. DISCUSSION OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

A. REQUIRED ELEMENTS/FI NDINGS

This section discusses the State of California statut ory requirements that apply to the proposed

rescission of Rule 1110

. These are actions, that need to be performed, and/or information, that must be provided in order to amend the Rule in a procedurally correct manner.

1. State Findings Required for Adopti on of Rules & Regulations:

Before adopting, amending, or repealing a rule or regulation, the AVAQMD Governing Board is required to make findings of necessity, authority, clarit y, consistency, non

duplication, and reference based upon relevant information presented at the hearing. The information below is provided to assist the Board in making these findings.

a. Necessity:

The proposed rescission of Rule 1110 is necessary to remove a rule that is inapplicable. Rule 1110 was adopted by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on November 6, 1981 to set up a demonstration program to

collect emission s data for SCAQMD Rule 1110.1

- Emissions from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines

. The SCAQMD demonstration program was completed on or about November 1991. This was prior to the formation of the Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District on 7/1/1997. Rule 1110 was subsequently rescind ed by the SCAQMD on November 14, 1997. Due to the provisions of the implementing statute and the subsequent statutory creation of the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District the rule remained in the AVAQMD rule book though it was inapplicable due to the termination of the program and the fact that none of the program engines were located within what is now the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD

b. Authority:

AVAQMD has the authority pursuant to Calif ornia Health and Safety Co de (H& S Code) §40702 to adopt, amend or repeal rules and regulations.

c. Clarity:

The proposed rescission is clear in that it is written so that the persons subject to

the r ule can easily understand why the rule is being rescin ded

.

d. Consistency:

The proposed rescission of Rule 1110 is in harmony with, and not in conflict with or contradictory to, any s tate law or regulation, federal law or regulation, orAVAQMD Rule 1110 5
Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 court decisions because this rescission removes a rule that is inapplicable because the demonstration program has been completed.

e. Non

- duplication:

The proposed rescission of Rule 11 10 removes a rule that is inapplicable because the demonstration program has been completed

, and thereby do es not impose the same requirements as an existing s tate or federal law or regulat ion

.

f. Reference:

AVAQMD has the authority pursuant to H& S Code §40702 to adopt, amend or repeal rules and regulations

.

g. Public Notice & Comment, Public Hearing:

Notice for the public hearing for the proposed rescission of Rule 1110 was published on 12/14/12 . See Appendix “B” for a copy of the publ ic notice. See Appendix C for copies of comments, if any, and AVAQMD responses.

2. Federal Elements (SIP Submittals, Other Federal Submittals).

Submittals to USEPA are require d to include various elements depending upon the type of document submitted and the underlying f ederal law which requires the submittal. The information below indicates which elements are required for the proposed

rescission of Rule 1110 and how they were satisfied.

a. Satisfaction of Underlying Federal Requirements:

The proposed rescission of Rule 11 10 is subject to all the requirements for a SIP

submittal because Rule 1110 is included in the AVAQMD SIP. The AVAQMD will be requesting that CARB ask USEPA to remove Rule 1110 from the SIP

since this rule is inapplicable because the demonstration program has been completed

.

b. Public Notice and Comment:

Notice for the public hearing for the proposed rescission of Rule 1110 was published on 12/14 /2012 . See Appendix “B” for a copy of the public notice.

c. Availability of Document:

Copies of the proposed rescinded Rule 1110 and the accompanying draft staff

report were made available to the public on 11/28 /2012

.6 AVAQMD Rule 1110 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 d. Notice to Specified Entities

Copies of the proposed rescinded Rule 1110 and the accompanying d raft staff

report were mailed to all affected agencies, including but not limited to CARB

and USEPA on 11/29 /2012

.

e. Public Hearing:

A public hearing to consider the proposed rescission of Rule 1110 was held on

1/15/201 3

.

f. Legal Authority to Adopt and Implement:

The AVAQMD has the authority pursuant to H&S Code §40702 to adopt, amend, or repeal rules and regulations and to do such acts as may be necessary

or p roper to execute the duties imposed upon the AVAQMD.

g. Applicable State Laws and Regulations Were Followed:

Public notice and hearing procedures pursuant to H&S Code §§40725

- 40728

ha ve been followed. See Section (V)(A)(1) above for compliance with state findings required pursuant to H&S Code §40727. See Section (V)(B) below for compliance with the required analysis of existing requirements pursuant to H&S Code §40727.2. See Section (V)(C) for compliance with economic analysis requirements pursuant to H&S Code §40920.6. See Section (V)(D) below for compliance with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

B. WRITTEN ANALYSIS OF EXISTING REQUIREMENT S

H& S Code §40727.2 requires air districts to prepare a written analysis of all existing federal air pollution control requirements that apply to the same equipment or source type as the rule proposed for res cission by the D istrict. The proposed rescission of Rule 1110 removes a rule that is inapplicable because the demonstration program has been completed. Therefore

, the preparation of a written analysis of existing pollution control requirements that apply to the same equipment or source type is not required.

C. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

1. General

There is no economic impact anticipated by the rescission of Rule 1110

. There are no sources subject to the provisions of the rule because this demonstration program was completed before the formation of the AVAQMD, and none of the program engines were located within what is now the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD

.AVAQMD Rule 1110 7 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 2. Incremental C ost Effectiveness

Pursuant to H&S Code §40920.6, incremental cost effectiveness calculations are required for rules and regulations which are adopted or amended to meet the California Clean Air Act require ments for Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) or “all feasible measures” to control volatile compounds, oxides of nitrogen or oxides of

sulfur.

The proposed rescission of Rule 1110 is not subject to incremental cost effectiveness

calculation s because this rule does not impose BARCT or “all feasible measures”.

D. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYS IS (CEQA)

Through the process described below, it was determined that a Notice of Exemption would be the appropria te CEQA process for the proposed rescission of Rule 1110

.

1. The proposed rescission of Rule 1110 meet s the CEQA definition of “ project. ” They are not “ ministerial ” actions.

2. The proposed rescission of Rule 1110 is exempt from CEQA review because

this d emonstration program was completed before the formation of the AVAQMD, and none of the program engines were located within what is now the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD . T here is no potential that the rescission might

cause the release of additional air contaminants or create an y adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, a Class 8 categorical exemption (14 Cal. Code Reg. §15308) applies.

E. SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRON MENTAL ANALYSIS

1. Potential Environmental Impacts

The proposed rescission of Rule 1110 removes a demonstration program that was completed before the formation of the AVAQMD, and none of the program eng ines were located within what is now the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD

. There is no potential that the rescission might cause the release of additional air contaminants or create any adverse environmental impacts

.

2. Mitigation of Impacts

N/A

3. Alternative Methods of Compliance

N/A8 AVAQMD Rule 1110 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 F. PUBLIC REVIEW

See Staff Report Section (V)(A)(1)(g) and (2)(b), as well as Appendix B.

VI. TECHNIC AL DISCUSSION

A. SOURCE DESCRIPTION

Rule 1110 is a rule that was designed to demonstrate the effectiveness of methods for the reduction of oxides of nitrogen emissions from sta tionary internal combustion engines. The demonstration program was implemented over a ten

- year period, ending on or before

November 1991.

B. EMISSIONS

The proposed rescission of Rule 1110 removes a demonstration program that w as completed before the formation of the AVAQMD, and none of the program engines were located within what is now the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD

. There is no potential that the rescission might cause the release of additional air contaminants or create any adverse environmental impact

. Therefore, Rule 1110 can be rescinded with no impact on emissions.

C. CONTROL REQUIREMENTS

The proposed rescission of Rule 1110 removes a demonstration program that was completed

befor e the formation of the AVAQMD, and none of the program engines were located within what is now the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD

. There is no potential that the rescission might cause the release of additional air contaminants or create any adverse environme ntal impact

. Therefore, Rule 1110 can be rescinded with no relaxation of control requirements

.

D. PROPOSED RULE SUMMAR Y

Rule 1110 is a rule that was designed to demonstrate the effectiveness of methods for the reduction of oxides of nitrogen emissions from stationary internal combustion engines. The demonstration program was implemented over a ten

- year period, ending on or before

November 1991

.

E. 110(l) Analysis

Rule 1110 has been ap proved by USEPA into the SIP (49 FR 18822, 5/03/1984 ). Therefore, the District will perform the 1 10(l) determination

.

T he requirements in Rule 1110 are inapplicable due to the termination of the demonstration program and the fact that none of the program engines were located within what is now the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD.AVAQMD Rule 1110 9 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 E. SIP HISTORY

1. SIP History.

Prior to 1975 the original air district for the Antelope Valley region was th e Los Angeles County APCD that had jurisdiction covering the entire county of Los Angeles. In 1975, the Southern California Air Pollution Control District (So. Cal. APCD) was created. The So. Cal. APCD was created by a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) betwee n Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties to replace the previous countywide air pollution control districts for those counties. On 02/01/77, pursuant to statute (Cal. Stats. 1976, Ch 324 p. 815) the South Coast Air Quality Management

D istrict (SCAQMD) was created with an initial jurisdiction that only included areas of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties contained within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). Outlying areas remained under the So. Cal. APCD (The legisl ation was thereafter amended to allow non SCAB areas to “opt in”. Los Angeles County exercised this option and thus the Antelope Valley became a part of SCAQMD). Also on 02/01/77 the California Air Resources Board (CARB) issued

Executive Order G

- 73 (1977 ) which adopted a “rule book” for those non

- SCAB areas of Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. CARB submitted the G

- 73 rulebook on behalf of the “county” districts.

By its terms Executive Order G

- 73 (1977) was only effective until the non

- SCAB areas took other action. On 02/22/77 the JPA forming the So. Cal. APCD was formally dissolved. By the terms of the JPA upon dissolution each county would regain its county air pollution control district with a jurisdiction of the non

- SCAB areas of the county and the applicable rules being the So. Cal. APCD’s rules in effect upon the date of dissolution. On 07/01/97 the Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District (AVAPCD) replaced the SCAQMD as the agency with jurisdiction over the Los Angeles Co unty portion of the Mojave Desert Air Basin (MDAB). On 01/01/02 the AVAPCD was replaced by the AVAQMD. Pursuant to both statutory changes, the rule and regulations of the predecessor district were retained until the Governing Board adopted, amended or re scinded them. At the first meeting of the both the AVAPCD and the AVAQMD, the respective Governing Boards reaffirmed all the rules and regulations in effect at the time the agency changed.

The jurisdiction of the AVAPCD and the AVAQMD were specified in th e statutes as the portion of the Los Angeles County contained within the MDAB. The MDAB was formerly known as the Southeast Desert Air Basin (SEDAB). In 1997 the SEDAB was split into the MDAB and the Salton Sea Air Basin. Descriptions of these air basin s can be found in 17 Cal. Code Regs. §§60109 and 60144. Since USEPA adopts SIP revisions in California as effective within jurisdictional boundaries of local air districts, when the local air district boundaries change the SIP as approved by USEPA for tha t area up to the date of the change remains as the SIP in that particular area. Thus, upon creation of the AVAPCD on 07/01/97 the AVAPCD acquired the SIP applicable to the Antelope Valley portion of the SCAQMD that was effective as of 06/30/97. Likewise10 AVAQMD Rule 1110 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 the AVAQMD acquired the SIP that was effective in the jurisdiction of the AVAPCD as of 12/31/01. Therefore, the SIP history for this region is based upon the rules adopted, effective, and approved for the Antelope Valley by SCAQMD.

Rule 1110 was originall y ado pted by the SCAQMD on 11/06/1981

. Rule 1110 w as

ap proved by USEPA into the SIP (49 FR 18822, 5/03/1984 ) , and is the current version in the AVAQMD rulebook

.

2. SIP Analysis.

The District will request that CARB submit t o USEPA a request to remove R ule 1110 from the SIP for the AVAQMD since the rule is inapplicable due to the termination of the program prior to the formation of the AVAQMD, and the fact that none of the program engines were located within the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD.AVAQMD Rule 1110 A

- 1
Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 

### APPENDIX "A"

Rule 1110

- Emissions from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (Demonstratio n)

Iterated Version

The iterated version is provided so that the changes to an existing rule may be easily found. The manner

of differ entiating text is as follows:

1. Underlined text identifies new or revised language.

2. Lined out text identifies language which is being deleted.

3. Normal text identifies the current language of the current rule which will remain unchanged by the adoption of the proposed amendments.

4. Italicized text identifies explanatory material that is not part of the proposed language.A

- 2 AVAQMD Rule 1110

Final Staff Report , 0 7 / 30 /2013 This page intentionally left blank.( Adopted : 11/06/81 ; Rescinded: mm/dd/yy)

A VAQMD Rule 1110 1110

- 1
Emissions From Stationary IC Engines (Demonstration)

D1: 11/15/12 

## RULE 1110 Emissions From Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (Demonstration)

(a) Definitions

For purposes of this rule, the following definitions shall apply:

(1) A Stationary Internal Combustion Engine (engine) is any spark ignition (Otto cycle) internal combustion engine that is operated at a specific site for more than one year or is

attached to a foundation at that site.

(2) A Rich

- Burn Engine is an engine that is operated with an ex haust stream oxygen concentration of less than one percent by volume.

(3) A Lean

- Burn Engine is an engine that is operated with an exhaust stream oxygen concentration greater than one percent by volume.

(4) An Existing Engine is an engine that prior to Nov ember 6, 1981:

(A) has been issued a valid Permit to Construct or Operate by the District, or

(B) Is in operation, including those operating pursuant to the provisions of District Rule 219(b)(1), or

(C) Is subject to review due to submittal of an applicati on for Permit to Construct or Operate which has been deemed complete by the Executive Officer.

(5) Output is the shaft output form the engine plus energy reclaimed by any heat recovery system, subject to the approval of the Executive Officer.

(6) Rated Bra ke Horsepower is the rating specified by the engine manufacturer.



### (b) Requirements

(1) Owners and/or operators of more than 5,000 total installed rated brake horsepower of existing engines shall participate in a program to demonstrate the effectiveness of methods for the reduction of oxides of nitrogen emissions from such engines, where:

(A) Rich

- burn engines demonstrate that:1 110

- 2 AVAQMD Rule 11 10 Emissions From Stationary IC Engines (Dem onstration)

D1: 11 / 15/ 12 (i) Oxides of nitrogen emissions do not exceed 0.28 microgram per joule output (0.75 g/bhp

- hr), or (ii) These engines have been modified or equipped with control devices to reduce oxides of nitrogen emissions by 90 percent, or (iii) Alternate emission limits of 48 ppm by volume oxides of nitrogen, corrected to 15 percent oxygen by volume, or limits as allowed by

Attachment "A" are not exceeded, or (iv) With control equipment installed and operating the emission limits of

rich

- burn engines, subsection (i), (ii) and (iii) above, cannot be met. For such engines the Executive Officer may alter emission limits and require continuatio n of testing, after studying costs, to provide meaningful information.

(B) Lean

- burn engines demonstrate that:

(i) Oxides of nitrogen emissions do not exceed 0.56 microgram per joule output (1.5 g/bhp

- hr), or (ii) These engines have been modified or equi pped with control devices to reduce oxides of nitrogen emissions by 80 percent, or (iii) Alternate emission limits of 96 ppm by volume oxides of nitrogen, corrected to 15 percent oxygen by volume, or limits as allowed by Attachment "A" are not exceeded, o r (iv) With control equipment installed and operating the emission limits of

lean

- burn engines, subsections (i), (ii) and (iii) above, cannot be met. For such engines the Executive Officer may alter emission limits and require continuation of testing, af ter studying costs, to provide meaningful information.

(C) The number of demonstration engines to be selected for testing by each owner and/or operator are determined from the Table of Sample Requirements Rich

Burn Engines and Table of Sample Requirements Lean

- Burn Engines below, except for substitutions allowed by the Executive Officer, but the total test engine horsepower shall not exceed five percent of the total horsepower of all engines under the control of the same owner and/or operator.

The engines s elected for testing shall show as much diversification of engine model and control system as possible and the selection shall be subject to the approval of the Executive Officer.A VAQMD Rule 1110 1110

- 3
Emissions From Stationary IC Engines (Demonstration)

D1: 11/15/12 (i) TABLE OF SAMPLE REQUIREMENTS

RICH

- BURN ENGINES

No. of Rich

- Burn Engines Operated Ranges of

In District Each Rated Brake No. of Operated At Least Horsepower Demonstration 2,000 hr/yr Per Engine Engines Required

20 or less 50 to 200 None

21 to 50 50 to 200 1

51 to 80 50 to 200 2

over 80 50 to 200 3

7 or less 201 to 500 None

8 to 15 201 to 500 1

over 15 201 to 500 2

7 or less 501 to 1,000 None

8 to 15 501 to 1,000 1

over 15 501 to 1,000 2

4 or less over 1,000 None

5 to 10 over 1,000 1

over 10 over 1,000 2

(ii) TABLE OF SAMPLE REQUIREMENTS FOR

LEAN

- BURN ENGINES

No. of Lean

- Burn Engines Operated Ranges of

in District Each Rated Brake No. Lean

- Burn Operated At Least Horsepower Demonstration 2,000 hr/yr Per Engine Engines Required

6 or less 500 and over 500 None

7 to 15 500 and over 500 1

16 to 24 500 and over 500 2

Over 24 500 and over 500 3

(D) Notwithstanding provisions of section (C), where an owner and/or operator has engines totaling more than 5,000 installed rated brake horsepower which operate more than 2,000 hours per yea r each, he shall provide at least one demonstration engine for the test program.1 110

- 4 AVAQMD Rule 11 10 Emissions From Stationary IC Engines (Dem onstration)

D1: 11 / 15/ 12 (E) The hours operated by test engines in the demonstration program shall be recorded in log books or by elapsed time recorders.

(F) The owner and/or operator shall submit to the Executive Officer the list by model and rating of all his engines, the list of selected test engines which are to be retrofitted with control devices or engine modifications, and the test plan, prepared following the guidelines provided by the Executi ve Officer, for the demonstration program by January 5, 1982. After approval of the selected test engines and test plan by the Executive Officer, the owner and/or operator shall:

(i) Have rich

- burn engines modifications completed and control systems installed and operating within six months, and (ii) Have lean

- burn engines modifications completed and control systems installed and operating within twenty

- four months, or (iii) Have received approval from the Executive Officer for an extension in progr am schedule because of nonavailability of control equipment and/or support services, or (iv) Received approval from the Executive Officer for delay in program implementation, not to exceed 12 months, because of funding problems (for Public Service Agencie s).

(G) Sequential measurements for oxides of nitrogen reduction, along with measurements of concentrations of oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, total hydrocarbons, and non

- methane hydrocarbons by method referenced in Attachment "B" or equivalent, a re made by the owner and/or operator within the first month of operation and, at a minimum, after each 2,000 hours of operation or each 6 months of operation, whichever comes first. Measurements of ammonia shall be made if deemed necessary by the Executiv e Officer.

(H) The test program continues for at least 12 consecutive months or until 4,000 hours of operation are accumulated for each test engine, whichever occurs first.

(I) Breakdown or failure of control equipment to control oxides of nitrogen

emissio ns within allowable limits of this rule during the program for periods exceeding forty

- eight hours shall be summarized in a monthly report to the Executive Officer, together with a description of the corrective measures

undertaken and/or to be undertaken.

(J) Test results shall be reported to the Executive Officer within sixty days after completion of each test period.

(2) After oxides of nitrogen control device installation or engine modifications a person shall not operate a test engine without periodic manual air

- fuel ratio adjustments or automatic controls to minimize the discharge of carbon monoxide (CO) into the atmosphere.A VAQMD Rule 1110 1110

- 5
Emissions From Stationary IC Engines (Demonstration)

D1: 11/15/12 (3) Notwithstanding Rule 219, owners and/or operators of demonstration engines and/or control devices shall apply for permits to construct and operate the demonstration engines and/or control devices. A test engine with control equipment will be considered a single permit unit.

(4) If an owner and/or operator participating in the test program meets the other requirements of this rule, the failure of his control equipment to meet the specified

emission limits will not constitute a violation of the rule.

(5) Owners and/or operators may apply engine test program results from this District and from other adjacent counties provided:

(A ) That the subject engine is, or would be considered in the case of an adjacent county, an existing engine; and

(B) That other requirements of this rule are met; and

(C) The control was not installed to comply with the requirements of any other non

demonst ration rule or regulation, including mitigations provided as offsets or emission reductions credits for New Source Review, Prevention of Significant Deterioration, or Emission Banking.

(6) Owners and/or operators may appeal to the South Coast Air Quality Manag ement Hearing

Board:

(A) Any decision of the Executive Officer to continue a test program when costs are

excessive.

(B) A requirement to test selected engines which are deemed to be obsolete for purposes of application of NO x control technology.

(C) Any decision of the Executive Officer to include an owner/operator in the test program, if such owner/operator is included in the program due to engines which will be permanently removed from service no later than three months after the dates specified in sub section (b)(1)(F)(i) or (b)(1)(F)(ii), as appropriate.

(7) Engines tested in this Demonstration Program shall be permitted to operate with the

No x control system used under this rule for a period of ten years from November 6,
1981 and shall not be subject to conditions of any other subsequent NO x rule during

that ten

- year period.1 110

- 6 AVAQMD Rule 11 10 Emissions From Stationary IC Engines (Dem onstration)

D1: 11 / 15/ 12 

### (c) Exemptions

(1) The provisions of this rule shall not apply to:

(A) Existing engines with less than 50 brake horsepower rating.

(B) Existing non

- carbureted turbocharged four

- s troke and existing two

- stroke Otto cycle engines all less than 500 brake horsepower rating.

(C) Engines used directly and exclusively for agricultural operation necessary for the growing of crops, or the raising of fowl or animals.

(D) Diesel cycle engines or gas turbines.

(E) Emergency standby engines which operate only as temporary replacements for primary mechanical or electrical power sources during periods of fuel or energy shortage or while the primary power source is undergoing repairs.

(F) Engines u sed exclusively for fire fighting operations.

[SIP: Approved 5/3/84, 49 FR 18822, 40 CFR 52.220(c)(121)(i)(C)]A VAQMD Rule 1110 1110

- 7
Emissions From Stationary IC Engines (Demonstration)

D1: 11/15/12 ATTACHMENT A

Alternative Emission Limit to Limit

the Oxides of Nitrogen (NO x ) Emissions

from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines

For stationary internal combustion engines, emissions of oxides of nitrogen shall not exceed an emission limit as determined by the following equation:

EMISSION LIMIT = STANDARD x UNIT EFFICIENCY

STANDARD EFFICIENCY

The STANDARD is 48 ppm NO x for rich

- b urn or 96 ppm for lean

- burn as corrected to 15 percent
oxygen at an engine STANDARD EFFICIENCY of 30 percent.

UNIT EFFICIENCY equals the total shaft output and reclaimed heat from any heat recovery system

divided by the energy input (as determined by a fuel measuring device accurate to + 5 percent and based on the higher heating value of the fuel). Any engine which has a tested efficiency greater than 30 percent is allowed a 30 percent unit efficiency for the purpose of this limitation.

The volume conc entration (ppm) of the oxides of nitrogen (NO x ) shall be corrected to 15 percent

oxygen (O 2 ) on a dry basis as follows:

20.9%

- 15%

PPM NO x (15% O 2 ) = PPM NO x (measured) x measured

20.9%

- % O 21 110

- 8 AVAQMD Rule 11 10 Emissions From Stationary IC Engines (Dem onstration)

D1: 11 / 15/ 12 ATTACHMENT B

Modified EPA Method 20

For the purpose of this rule, the following modifications shall be applied to EPA Reference Method 20 as published in the Federal Register on September 10, 1979.

(1) General Note

- All references to SO 2 of sulfur measurement shall be deleted.

(2) Section 4 .1.4

- The NO x to NO converter as shown in Figure 20.1 is normally integrated into

the NO x analyzer. In addition, the deletion of the converter shall not be an option as it presently is in

Method 20.

(3) Section 4.3

- Calibration gases shall be at 0, 50 percent, and 90 percent of full scale. The full scale value shall be selected so that the measured value is approximately 50 percent of scale.

(4) Section 6.1.2

- Delete all references to a preliminary O 2 traverse; however, O 2 shall be

measured continuous ly during the test.

(5) Section 6.1.2.1

- To allow for very small cross sections the minimum number of points shall be adjusted at the discretion of the Executive Officer.

(6) Section 6.2

- Testing shall be at actual load conditions. The test period shall be a minimum of fifteen minutes per load condition to determine compliance initially. However, if the source is not in compliance after the initial fifteen minutes, the test shall be continued for at least one hour and forty

five minutes. The stack shal l be traversed initially to determine the degree of stratification in the stack.

Sampling time at each traverse point shall be a minimum of two minutes plus system response time. The remainder of the test period shall be with the probe inlet at the avera ge point.

(7) An ultimate analysis or equivalent shall be performed on the fuel fired using ASTM Method

D3178

- 74 or D3176 (liquid fuels) or D1946

- 67 (72) (gaseous fuels) as applicable, to determine the theoretical maximum concentration in the flue gases sh all not deviate by more than an amount specified by the Executive Officer, from the predicted O 2 concentration based on the concurrent CO 2 measurement and the ultimate analysis.AVAQMD Rule 1110 B

- 1
Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 

### APPENDIX "B"

PUBLIC NOTICE DOCUMENTS

(to be included when available)

1. Proof of Publication for Notice of Public Hearing

– Antelope Valley Press

, 12/14/2012B

- 2 AVAQMD Rule 1110 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 This page intentionally left blank.AVAQMD Rule 1110 B

- 3
Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13B

- 4 AVAQMD Rule 1110 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 This page intentionally left blank.AVAQMD Rule 1110 C

- 1

Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 

### APPENDIX "C"

PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

No comments received to date.C

- 2 AVAQMD Rule 1110 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 This page intentionally left blank.AVAQMD Rule 1110 D

- 1
Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 

### APPENDIX "D" CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

DOCUMENTATION
(to be included as available)

1. Notice of Exemption

– Los Angeles CountyD

- 2 AVAQMD Rule 1110 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 This page intentionally left blank.AVAQMD Rule 1110 D

- 3
Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13D

- 4 AVAQMD Rule 1110 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13AVAQMD Rule 1110 E

- 1
Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 

### APPENDIX "E"

BIBLIOGRAPHY

The following documents were consulted in the preparation of this staff report and the proposed

rescission of Rule 1110 :

1. South Coast Air Quality Management District rescission package, from November 14, 1997.E

- 2 AVAQMD Rule 1110 Final Staff Report, 0 7 / 30 /13 This page intentionally left blank.