alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-920-1310-01; WYW142080] 

Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), an 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW 142080 for lands in Campbell and Johnson Counties, Wyoming, was timely filed and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date of termination.

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively.                

                    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $158 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the  Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW142080 effective July 1, 2000, subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                

Theresa M. Stevens,

Acting Chief, Leasable Minerals Section.

[FR Doc. 00-26423  Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed August 31, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-505

Lower Tribunal No. 18-21048

________________

Janet Rodriguez,

Appellant,

vs.

US Bank Trust NA, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Migna Sanchez-Llorens, Judge.

Janet Rodriguez, in proper person.

No appearance, for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 

9.315(a). (“After service of the initial brief ..., the court may summarily affirm 
2

the order to be reviewed if the court finds that no preliminary basis for 

reversal has been demonstrated.”).

Affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5616 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain turn or turned 

footwear with outer soles of leather and uppers of leather. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Ms. JENKINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain turn 

or turned footwear with outer soles of leather and uppers 

of leather. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN TURN OR TURNED FOOTWEAR WITH 

4 OUTER SOLES OF LEATHER AND UPPERS OF 

5 LEATHER. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.48 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 certain turn or turned footwear with outer soles of leather 

9 and uppers of leather) is amended by striking the date 

10 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5616 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Gary C. Wetzel, as Chief Financial Officer of Von Hoffmann Holdings Inc. and Von Hoffmann Corporation (collectively, the
"Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:

(1)   the
accompanying Form 10-K report for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
March 30, 2004

| |  |  | /s/GARY C. WETZELGary C. Wetzel Chief Financial Officer of the
Company
| |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26542]



[[Page 61334]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors 
that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 
7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 31, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Gene Allen Van Meter, Beaumont, Texas; Barbara Van Meter, 
Beaumont, Texas; Gene Allen Van Meter, Jr. , Lumberton, Texas; and Gary 
Stephen Van Meter, Beaumont, Texas all to acquire additional voting 
shares of Lamar Bancshares, Inc., Beaumont, Texas, and thereby 
indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Lamar Bank, Beaumont, 
Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 11, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-26542 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACOACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00493-ADA

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA), INC., §

ZTE (TX), INC.

Defendant

ORDER SETTING Discovery DISCOVERY HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is SETET for

DISCOVERY HEARING, in U.S. Magistrate Court, Courtroom No. 2, Third Floor, 800 Franklin

Avenue, Waco,aco Texas, on November 01, 2022 at 01:30 PM.

28th day of October, 2022.

Derek T. Gilliland

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00493-ADA-DTG Document 242 Filed 10/28/22 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
GEORGE STONER, Petitioner

v.
PENN KLEEN, INC., K.E.W. INDUSTRIES LIMITED, PENN KLEEN EX-ITS, INC., NILFISK-ADVANCE, INC., NILFISK-ALTO CLEANING SYSTEMS, INC., ALTO CLEANING SYSTEMS, INC., NILFISK-ADVANCE GROUP, NILFISK-ALTO, EN DIVISION AF NILFI, AND K.E.W. INDUSTRI A/S, Respondents : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 15 EAL 2013
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 7th day of October, 2014, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 27

                           STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIER
                           FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Strawbridge & Clothier's condensed consolidated statement of net assets in
liquidation at November 2, 1996 and Strawbridge & Clothier's condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended November 2,
1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                           6,239
<SECURITIES>                                   212,946
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,496
<PP&E>                                           7,025
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,547
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     190,159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   253,706
<SALES>                                        392,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               407,704
<CGS>                                          316,813
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               105,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                57,906
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,917
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (78,829)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (59,619)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (59,619)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.61)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick J. Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/PATRICK J. MOOREPatrick J. Moore President
and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 8, 2002 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06

- 14

- 00030

- CV

Progressive Transportation, LLC

v.

Republic National Industries of Texas, LP, and Republic Corporation

(No. 2013

- 9369 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF HARRISON C OUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING FE E

SUPREME COURT CHAPTE R 51 FEE

INDIGENT

CLERK'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD $10.00
$100.00 $20.00
$50.00 $25.00
$516.00
$465.00 E

- PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID JADD F MASSO

STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP
STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP
STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP
SHACKELFORD, MELTON

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judg ment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, sh owing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of

the COURT OF APPEALS for the Sixth District of Texas, this April 23, 2015

.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___

________________________ Deputy
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Northrop Grumman Corporation ) 

) 

Under Contract No. F 19628-00-C-O 100 et al. ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59556 

Karen L. Manos, Esq. 

Lindsay M. Paulin, Esq. 

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 

Washington, DC 

Linda T. Maramba, Esq. 

Corporate Counsel - Litigation 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Lawrence S. Rabyne, Esq. 

Senior Trial Attorney 

Nygina T. Mills, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Arlington Heights, IL 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE PEACOCK 

It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b) and the parties' 

Settlement Agreement, dated 15 June 2016, resulting from an Alternative Dispute 

Resolution process and the parties' "STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT" 

(Stipulation), that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent judgment, the Board 

determines that the government's share of the segment closing adjustment required by 

Cost Accounting Standard 413-50(c)(l2), resulting from the sale by Northrop Grumman 

Corporation of its Data Systems Division-San Diego, is $3, l 7 5 ,000, to be paid in 

accordance with the parties' Settlement Agreement and Stipulation. /, 

Dated: 7 July 2016 

(Signatures continued) 

/ 

R 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I concur 

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59556, Appeal of Northrop Grumman 

Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.2 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
America First Apartment Investors, Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-116565) on Form
S-3 of America First Apartment Investors, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2004, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheet of America First Apartment Investors, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2003, and the consolidated
statements of income and comprehensive income, partners capital, and cash flows of America First
Apartment Investors, L.P. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2002, which report
appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of America First Apartment Investors,
Inc. /s/ KPMG LLP Omaha, Nebraska
March 15, 2005
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5587 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Solvent Violet 11. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Solvent Violet 11. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SOLVENT VIOLET 11. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 9,10-Anthracenedione, 1,4- 

diamino (Solvent Violet 11) 

(CAS No. 128–95–0) (provided for in subheading 

3204.11.25) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5587 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
*

The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, United States District

Court for the District of Minnesota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2726

___________

Alice David, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District

* of Minnesota.

Commissioner of Labor, State of *

New York, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: January 20, 2004

Filed: January 22, 2004

___________

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Alice David appeals the district court’s*

 dismissal of David’s civil complaint

seeking unemployment insurance benefits. After careful review of the record, we

conclude David’s complaint was properly dismissed as res judicata-barred. See

Migra v. Warren City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 465 U.S. 75, 81 (1984); Parker v.
-2-

Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 712 N.E.2d 647, 649-50 (N.Y. 1999). Accordingly, we

affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
##### 



Exhibit 99.4 (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP350 S. Grand Ave.Los Angeles CA 9007lTelephone (213) 236 3000
 Report of Independent Auditors To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of GreenPoint Financial Corporation: We have examined managements assertion
about GreenPoint Financial Corporation and
its subsidiaries, including GreenPoint
Mortgage Funding, Inc. (the Company)
compliance with the minimum servicing
standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of Americas Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
(USAP) as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2003 included in the
accompanying management assertion (see
Exhibit I). Management is responsible for
the Companys compliance with those minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on managements
assertion about the Companys compliance
based on our examination. Our examination was made in accordance with
attestation standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about
the Companys compliance with the minimum
servicing standards and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not
provide a legal determination on the
Companys compliance with the minimum
servicing standards. In our opinion, managements assertion that
the Company complied with the aforementioned
minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly
stated, in all material respects. (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP)
March 25, 2004




---



##### 



Exhibit I Managements Assertion Regarding Compliance
With Minimum Servicing Standards As of and for the year ended December 31,
2003, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.
(the Company), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of GreenPoint Financial Corporation, has
complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of
Americas Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period, GreenPoint
Financial Corporation maintained on behalf
of the Company, errors and omissions and
employee fidelity bond insurance policies
in the amount of $20,000,000 and
$50,000,000, respectively. March 25, 2004 /s/ Becky Poisson  
 /s/ Nathan Hieter  
 /s/ David Petrini  
 /s/ S.A Ibrahim
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 

**- 1967** 

CHADWICK DAVID MYERS
,

Petitioner

- Appellant
,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
,
Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court . ( Tax Ct. No. 30321

- 13L )

Submitted : January 14, 2016 Decided: January 19, 2016

Before A GEE
, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Chadwick David Myers, Appellant Pro Se. Michael J

. Haungs, Supervisory Attorney, Marion Elizabeth Erickson, U NITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Chadwick David Myers a ppeals from the tax court ’ s order

upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s proposed levy

action with respect to his income tax liability for the tax years

2003 through 2009, and imposing a penalty against Myers for making

frivolous arguments, 26 U.S.C. § 6673 (2012). We hav e reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the tax court. Myers v. Comm’r of

Internal Revenue , No. 30321

- 13L (U.S.T.C. May 28, 2015). We deny

the Commissioner’s motions to strike Myers’ brief and for

sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2


2002 ENESCO GROUP, INC.
ROA INCENTIVE PROGRAM 2002


The ROA Incentive Plan provides bonus opportunities for all exempt and
non-exempt employees. The ROA Incentive Plan is based entirely on company
profitability. The two financial measures that will be used are:

-   Operating income as a percent of Sales     50%
-   Return on Assets                           50%

If Enesco meets its financial goals in these two categories, employees will earn
a bonus that is calculated as a percent of their salary. Employee's bonus
opportunity amount depends on the employee's position in the company and
Enesco's attainment of goals.

Eligibility:               To be eligible for the award you must be employed by
                           September 30 of the current year. If hired during the
                           calendar year, the incentive award will be pro-rated
                           based on months employed. If salary adjustments occur
                           during the calendar year, the award will be
                           pro-rated. Employees must be active full-time through
                           the end of the year to be eligible for the annual
                           incentive award.

                           ROA payouts will be made during the 1st quarter of
                           the following year.

Enesco may at anytime and from time to time, amend, modify or suspend this plan
with/without prior notice.