alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5570 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on synthetic indigo powder, 

(3H-indol-3-one, 2-(1,3-dihydro- 3-oxo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)–1,2-dihydro-). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on synthetic 

indigo powder, (3H-indol-3-one, 2-(1,3-dihydro- 3-oxo2H-indol-2-ylidene)–1,2-dihydro-). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SYNTHETIC INDIGO POWDER, (3H-INDOL-3-ONE, 

4 2-(1,3-DIHYDRO- 3-OXO-2H-INDOL-2-YLIDENE)- 

5 1,2-DIHYDRO-). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.66 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 synthetic indigo powder, (3H-indol-3-one, 2-(1,3-dihydro9 3-oxo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-)) is amended by 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5570 IH

1 striking the date in the effective period column and insert2 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q DATED MARCH 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000094673
<NAME> STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1997
<CASH>                                         521,651
<SECURITIES>                                    16,962
<RECEIVABLES>                                  420,979<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    289,339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,248,931
<PP&E>                                         328,138<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,867,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          484,195
<BONDS>                                         21,692
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,332,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,867,122
<SALES>                                        297,670
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               438,595
<CGS>                                          165,405
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  241,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,699
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,289
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,589
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,589
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Asset values for the interim period represent net amounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```
**RETENTION AWARD
                                                   Harold B. Ray

                                                       Terms****Amount**
$600,000 present value, equally divided between deferred cash and EIX stock units.

**Vesting**
The deferred cash and EIX stock units will vest 100% on the first day of the month in which HBR attains age 65
(August 2005).  The award is forfeited if HBR voluntarily terminates his employment earlier.

**Deferred Cash**
Deferred cash will be credited under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (EDCP) on January 2, 2003.  This
retention award is not subject to the double death benefit provided in Article 8 of the EDCP.

**Stock Units**
$300,000 will be converted to EIX stock units based on the average of the closing prices of EIX common stock for
the last 60 days of 2002, and the EIX stock units will be credited to an unfunded bookkeeping account on January
2, 2003.  The EIX stock units will accrue dividend equivalents if dividends are paid on EIX common stock and will
accumulate without interest.  The EIX stock units and dividend equivalents will be paid in cash on the first day
of the month in which HBR attains age 65 at a value equal to the average of the closing prices of EIX common
stock for the 60 days prior to that date.  At least six months prior to the scheduled payment date, HBR may elect
to defer payment under the terms of the DCP.

**Involuntary Severance, Death or Disability**
In the event HBR's employment is terminated due to involuntary severance, death or disability, a pro rata portion
of the retention award will vest and be paid based on the number of full months worked prior to such termination
divided by the total number of months in the vesting period.  The EIX stock units so vested will be paid at a
value equal to the average of the closing prices of EIX common stock for the 60 days prior to the date employment
ends.
```
#### GOLDSMITH v. STATE.

No. 25134.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 7, 1951.

*250Ramey & Ramey, by J. R. Ramey, Sul-phur Springs, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The information contained two counts, one alleging that appellant, while intoxicated, drove and operated a motor vehicle upon a public highway, the other alleging that the motor vehicle was driven upon a public highway by appellant, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

Both counts were - submitted to the jury and appellant’s guilt was maije to depend upon a finding that he was both intoxicated and under the influence of intoxicating liquor at the time.

The jury assessed the punishment at a fine of $50.

The information was not defective in failing to allege or describe the public highway upon which appellant was alleged to have driven the motor vehicle, and appellant’s motion to quash because of a failure to give a description thereof was properly overruled. Allen v. State, 149 Tex.Cr. R. 612, 197 S.W.2d 1013.

A police patrolman of the City of Sulphur Springs, attracted by the manner in which appellant was driving his automobile, stopped him. According to his testimony, appellant was drunk at that time. Witness further testified that appellant staggered when he walked, and that he smelled alcohol upon appellant’s breath.

The jury was authorized to believe the testimony of the patrolman, and the facts are therefore sufficient to sustain the conviction.

There was no variance between the allegation of the information that the motor vehicle was driven upon a public highway and the proof showing that the motor vehicle was driven upon a public street, for a “street” is a public highway. Lamkin v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 99, 123 S.W.2d 662.

Appellant presents several bills of exception, each complaining of argument of state’s counsel. The argument complained of violated no mandatory statutory provision, nor was it of such nature as to manifest reversible error, in view of the infliction by the jury of the minimum punishment in this case.

The information alleged and the facts showed that the event out of which the prosecution arose occurred on June 11, 1950. In submitting the case to the jury, the trial court authorized appellant’s conviction of the offense charged if such was found to have been committed “on or before the 11th day of June, 1950.”

To such instruction an exception was duly reserved as authorizing appellant’s conviction at any time prior to the date fixed *251in the information and beyond’the period of limitation.

It would have been the better practice to use the term, “on or about,” rather than “on or before,” yet, under the particular facts here presented, we are unable to conclude that reversible error is reflected, especially in view of the fact that there was only one transaction before the jury where the state insisted that appellant, while intoxicated, operated his 'automobile.

Other bills of exception have been examined and are overruled without discussion.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
Case 6:20-cv-00505-ADA Document 10 Filed 03/24/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 6:20-cv-00505-ADA Document 10 Filed 03/24/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Transition Report of Elizabeth Arden, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Scott Beattie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Stephen J. Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge: 

(i)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5486 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5486

 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on outer soles and heels, of 
                          rubber or plastics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on outer soles and heels, of 
                          rubber or plastics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OUTER SOLES AND HEELS, OF RUBBER OR PLASTICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Outer soles and     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          heels, of rubber                                                  12/31/2015
                          or plastics
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          6406.20.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### GILLUM v. GILLUM.

No. 9938.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

Jan. 17, 1951.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 7, 1951.

*193Harry S. Pollard, of Austin, for appellant.

Albert G. Walker, of Austin, for appel-lee.

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the district court directing the appellant to contribute the sum of $25 per month for the support of William Clark Gillum, Jr., age about one year.

The appellant and appellee were divorced in September 1949, and provision was made in the judgment for the support of Billie Ruby Gillum, a child about eighteen months old.

William Clark Gillum, Jr., was born on February 4, 1950, some five months after the divorce between the parties.

On May 26, 1950, appellee filed a motion to amend the judgment made in the divorce suit to require the appellant to pay the appellee $50 each month thereafter for the support of William Clark Gillum, Jr.

The defendant in the proceeding, appellant herein, filed an answer denying any responsibility for the support of said child and questioned the custody of the child but offered no suggestion as to a better custody arrangement.

The trial was before the court, who heard the testimony of the several witnesses, most of which, unless it bore on the custody of the child, was not admissible, and an order was entered on July 27, 1950, amending th'e judgment of September 26, 1949, and directing the appellant to contribute the sum of $25 per month toward the support of William Qark Gi.lum, Jr., beginning on August 5, 1950.

We believe that the trial court had the right and duty to exercise its sound discretion in determining what was for the best interest of the child, and doubtless, in a subsequent proceeding, if instituted, will award the custody of the child finally as to the court appears to be for the best interest of the child. Trevino v. Trevino, Tex.Civ.App., 193 S.W.2d 254.

The testimony disclosed that appellant earns approximately $300 per month, and an order fixing the sum of $25 was a proper exercise of discretion. Ex parte Roberts, 139 Tex. 644, 165 S.W.2d 83; Mahaffey v. Mahaffey, Tex.Civ.App., 219 S.W.2d 519.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5358 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5358

  To suspend temporarily the duty on placebos to be used in clinical 
                      trials for the drug ASP0777.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Dold introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on placebos to be used in clinical 
                      trials for the drug ASP0777.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLACEBOS TO BE USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS FOR THE DRUG ASP0777.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Placebos, composed  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          of D-mannitol,                                                    12/31/2015
                          sodium starch
                          glycolate, and
                          magnesium
                          stearate, to be
                          used in clinical
                          trials for the
                          drug ASP0777
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2106.90.99)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60903-60904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Addition to the procurement list.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List a service to be 
furnished by a nonprofit agency employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 13, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louis R. Bartalot, (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 25, 2000 the Committee for 
Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published 
notice (61 F.R. 51794) of proposed addition to the Procurement List. 
After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of the qualified nonprofit agency to provide the service and 
impact of the addition on the current or most recent contractor, the 
Committee has determined that the service listed below is suitable for 
procurement by the

[[Page 60904]]

Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 46-48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the service to the 
Government.
    2. The action will not have a severe economic impact on current 
contractors for the service.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the service to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the service proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Accordingly, the following service is hereby added to the 
Procurement List:

Janitorial/Custodial

Backbay National Wildlife Refuge, 4005 Sandpiper Road, Virginia 
Beach, Virginia

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to 
the effective date of this addition or options that may be exercised 
under those contracts.


Louis R. Bartalot,
Deputy Director (Operations).
[FR Doc. 00-26362 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-U
Forwarded by Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/06/2010 08:51 PM

| From: |

|Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US

|

| To: |

|Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

| Cc: |

|Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven Silverman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Susan

Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA |

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > | Date: |

|

|07/29/2010 05:56 PM

|

| Subject: |

||PCA and Ash Grove Meetings

Dear Courtney:

I am sure you already understand this but I wanted to go on the record on some of

the things said during the meeting with PCA and Ash Grove. I do not generally

comment during those meetings because I see them as opportunities for

stakeholders (industry and otherwise) to present their views to OMB. I get lots

of opportunities to talk to OMB, so I don't want t use up their time. Several

times in both meeting statements were made that implied I would be in agreement

with what was said. The fact that I remained silent did not signify agreement.

I will be glad to provide our opinions on any of the issues raised by PCA or Ash

Grove with you in the next call.

Keith W. Barnett

USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

Mail Code D243

‐ 02

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

919

‐ 541

‐ 5605

barnett.keith@epa.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5421 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5421

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electric storage batteries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Mr. Honda introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electric storage batteries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ELECTRIC STORAGE BATTERIES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Lead-acid storage   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          batteries of                                                      12/31/2015
                          other voltages
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8507.20.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
China Properties Developments, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of the undersigned’s knowledge, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:
                                      April
      15, 2009
                                      
                                      By:
                                      /s/ Ping’an
      WuPing’an
      Wu, Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal
      Executive Officer)Dated:
                                      April
      15, 2009
                                      
                                      By:
                                      /s/
      Shuo (Steven) LouShuo
      (Steven) Lou, Chief Financial Officer,Chief
      Accounting Officer and Executive VP(Principal
      Financial Officer)