alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, AND VMWARE, 

INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00486-ADA

DECLARATION OF BRIAN A. ROSENTHAL IN SUPPORT OF

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 32-1 Filed 10/05/20 Page 1 of 2
1

I, Brian A. Rosenthal, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney permitted to practice law before this Court pro hac vice and am 

licensed to practice law in New York and the District of Columbia. I am a partner with the law 

firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and counsel of record for Defendants Dell Technologies 

Inc., Dell Inc., EMC Corporation, and VMware, Inc. in the above-captioned action. I have 

personal knowledge and/or am directly informed of the matters stated below and, if called, would 

testify to them under oath.

2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are true and correct copies of excerpts from the file 

history of U.S. Patent No. 7,092,360, specifically from a May 18, 2006 Response and Amendment 

filed by the applicant. These excerpts were retrieved from the United States Patent Office’s 

website (https://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair) on October 3, 2020.

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of an article, Billaud, J.P. 

et al., “hClock: Hierarchical QoS for Packet Scheduling in a Hypervisor,” Association for 

Computing Machinery, April 15–17, 2003.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: October 5, 2020

/s/ Brian A. Rosenthal___ Brian A. Rosenthal

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 32-1 Filed 10/05/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5576 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5576

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-amino-6-niotrophenol-4-
                             sulfonic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-amino-6-niotrophenol-4-
                             sulfonic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-AMINO-6-NIOTROPHENOL-4-SULFONIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.37 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-amino-6-niotrophenol-4-
sulfonic acid) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### FERDIN v. STATE.

No. 25426.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 31, 1951.

*172No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAU CPI AMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for the -offense of assault with intent to rape. The penalty'assessed is four years in the penitentiary.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exception. All proceedings appear regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### William Lewis, Respondent, *v.*Wise Shops, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 27, 1957.

*338
      *Howard L. Klein*for appellant.

*Samuel D. Pressman*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff alleged a contract made in January, 1955, for his employment by defendant for a term expiring December, 1955, for which he was to receive $200 a week, and an additional sum of $2,500 as a bonus under certain specific circumstances. This contract was entire and not severable. Accordingly, by limiting the question before the jury solely to whether or not there was a promise by defendant to pay plaintiff a bonus of $2,500, defendant was deprived of the opportunity of having the jury consider whether or not there was sufficient evidence to sustain the entire contract upon which plaintiff’s first cause of action is predicated.

Where a charge is wrong in its essential elements and goes on a distinctly wrong theory, reversal and a new trial is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice *(Gales-Rojac Corp.*v. *Pennsylvania R. R. Co.,*2 Misc 2d 613).

The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant.

Hecht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5517 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Diacid Modified Vinyl acetateVinyl chloride copolymer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. WALBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Diacid Modified 

Vinyl acetate-Vinyl chloride copolymer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIACID MODIFIED VINYL ACETATE-VINYL 

4 CHLORIDE COPOLYMER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Diacid Modified Vinyl acetate-Vinyl chloride copolymer (CAS No. 28086–69– 

3) (provided for in subheading 3904.30.60) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5517 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 15





Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, Northwest
Washington, D.C.  20549
Attention:  Document Control

Re:  The Southland Corporation Form 10-Q

We are aware that our report dated April 21, 1997 on our review of the 
condensed consolidated balance sheet of The Southland Corporation and 
Subsidiaries as of March 31, 1997, and the condensed consolidated statements 
of earnings and cash flows for the three-month period then ended, included in 
this Form 10-Q, is incorporated by reference in the following registration 
statements:

                                                            REGISTRATION NO.

     On Form S-8 for:

          Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to The Southland
          Corporation Equity Participation Plan                  33-23312

          Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to The Southland
          Corporation Grant Stock Plan                           33-25327

          The Southland Corporation 1995 Stock Incentive Plan    33-63617

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should 
not be considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified 
by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Dallas, Texas
April 28, 1997



                                    Tab 2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105



## MEMO RANDUM

DATE: September 18, 2015

TO: EPA Region 9 Rulemaking File for the BAAQMD NSR SIP Submittal

FROM: Ann Lyons, EPA Region 9, Office of Regional Counsel

SUBJECT: September 1 8 , 20 15 Phone Call regarding EPA Proposed Limited Approval and

Limited Disapproval of Regulation 2, Rules 1 & 2

ATTENDEES

• Ann Lyons

, Region 9, Office of Regional Counsel

• Sandy Crockett, BAAQMD Counsel’s Office

SUMMARY

I recommended BAAQMD could look at Placer County Rule 305.2 or Sacramento Rule 214 for

examples of rules to implement 40 CFR 51.160. I also recommended reviewing Sacramento

Rule 214 as an example of a rule to implement 40 CFR 51.307.

ATTACHMENTS

• N one
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT 

OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) 

INC., AND ZTE (TX), INC.

Defendants.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-487-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-488-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-489-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-490-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-491-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-492-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-493-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-494-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-495-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-496-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-497-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER DENYING ZTE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION

Having considered ZTE Corporation’s (“ZTE”) respective Motions for 

Reconsideration of this Court’s Order Granting-in-Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 

in the above-titled cases, the Court finds that ZTE has failed to establish a manifest error 

of law or fact and has not presented newly discovered evidence. Because ZTE has failed 

to meet its burden as the movant, the Court finds the motion should be DENIED. 

The propriety of ZTE’s motions aside, the Court does recognize the possibility 

that WSOU will pursue parallel litigations against ZTE USA in another district, 

and therefore raises a possible judicial efficiency concern. However, to the 

Court’s knowledge, WSOU has yet to file such a suit. And while ZTE USA may be 

“likely to file a declaratory judgment action in a proper forum,” ZTE USA has yet to 

bring such an action. Thus, to the extent there is a judicial efficiency concern here, 

that concern remains hypothetical. 

Case 6:20-cv-00495-ADA Document 111 Filed 09/03/21 Page 1 of 2
2 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that ZTE Corporation’s motion is 

DENIED. 

It is further ORDERED that ZTE’s Answer to WSOU’s Amended Complaint is 

due on or before September 17, 2021. 

Signed on September 3, 2021.

Case 6:20-cv-00495-ADA Document 111 Filed 09/03/21 Page 2 of 2
<Page>

                          Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
                               1800 M Street, N.W.
                             Washington, D.C. 20036

Michael Berenson
(202) 467-7450
mberenson@morganlewis.com


September 19, 2001

The American Life Insurance Company of New York
The American Separate Account 5
435 Hudson Street, 2nd Floor
New York, New York 10014

Re:      Registration No. 333-62662
         --------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Statement of Additional Information contained in Pre-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-62662)
for The American Separate Account 5 filed by the Account with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933.

                                            Very truly yours,



                                            MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

                                            By: /s/ Michael Berenson
                                                --------------------
                                                Michael Berenson
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #11-2002 Ltd. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Nancy J. McGurk, Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

                                       /s/ Nancy J. McGurk
                                       Nancy J. McGurk
                                       Chief Financial Officer of the Managing
                                       General Partner
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATIONS





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections


(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)








Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of The L.S. Starrett Company, a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 25, 2010 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date
February 3, 2011

/S/ Douglas A. StarrettDouglas A. Starrett

Chief Executive OfficerDate
February 3, 2011

/S/ Francis J. O’BrienFrancis J. O’Brien

Chief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The L.S. Starrett Company and will be retained by The L.S. Starrett Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 19, 2015

NO. 03-15-00646-CV

Chet Edward Cunningham, Appellant

v.

Tara Michelle Cunningham, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on September 22, 2015. 

Chet Edward Cunningham has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the 

motion, the Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the 

motion and dismisses the appeal. Each party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, 

both in this Court and in the court below.
#### Ray Spector, Respondent, *v.*Philip Puglisi, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

October 25, 1957.

*Lillian E. Cuff*for appellant.

*Max Krongold*and *Ezekiel Jasper*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

In this action for personal injuries, plaintiff seeks a recovery from the owner of real property for his alleged negligence in failing to clean the public sidewalk in front of his property after receiving notice that strawberries and vegetable leaves had been strewn thereon. It clearly appears from the evidence that this condition was created by someone other than defendant owner. Absent any proof to connect this defendant with the person who was initially responsible for such condition, plaintiff failed to establish any basis for liability herein *(Frank*v. *Muller,*200 App. Div. 639, affd. 235 N. Y. 540). The duty to clean the sidewalk imposed on an owner of real property by section 755 (3)-2.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York is enforcible only at the instance of the city *(City of Rochester*v. *Campbell,*123 N. Y. 405; *Troeger*v. *Prudential Ins. Co. of America,*154 Misc. 537).

The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law, with costs to defendant-appellant and complaint dismissed with costs.

Pette, Habt and Di Gtovanna, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 1, 2024

NO. 03-23-00800-CV

Tina Carloni, Appellant

v.

Jeffrey Shields, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on August 29, 2023. Appellant

has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that 

the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. 

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
| 1. | Such Annual Report on Form      10-K for the year      ending December      31, 2008, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year      ending December      31, 2008, fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of MEDASORB TECHNOLOGIES      CORPORATION |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:        April 10, 2009           |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |
| /s/ David      Lamadrid                         |
| David      LamadridChief      Financial Officer |

----
### Request for Inform ation FAA-2014-0397 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Anderson: This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition for amendment dated June 23, 2016 (Docket No. FAA-2014-0397). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

z A detailed description of the Yamaha FAZER UAS helicopter design and configuration focusing on the UAS features and flight character istics to include, but not limited to: { Operational limitations, re strictions, and warnings (spray and non-spray use) { Operational history with supporting statis tics; particularly where Yamaha Motor Corporation was the principal operato r, or retained direct oversight { Results of analysis and flight testing of UAS, especially results that form the basis of the UAS operational envelope analysis { Log of repairs and alterations performed during operations to include design changes and fixes due to operational failure(s) (lessons learned) { Details of any injuries or property damage encountered during flight or ground operations { Details of any failure modes such as lost link, fly-away, loss of control, and etc. z Copies of company manuals, photographs, vide os/telemetry may be provided as support z Any other information to support operational safety with UAS in excess of 55 pounds. Please submit the additional informati on (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov
. Once your information is submitted, please save your tracking numbe r and submit your tracking number along with the information submitted to the docket, and any proprietary inform ation electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to pro cess your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/21/16 . If we do not receive the info rmation, we will close the docket without notifying you further. FAA Office o f Rulemakin g Sent : Monday , November 07, 2016 10:15 AM To: brad

_ [anderson@yama ha-motor.com] Page 1 of 1 Request for Information FAA -201 4 -039 7

11 / 7 /201 6 https://email.dot.gov/owa/ 9 -AWA -AV S -333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Not e ...
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. 

and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00507-ADA 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC’S MOTION FOR 

ISSUANCE OF LETTER OF REQUEST TO EXAMINE PERSONS AND INSPECT 

DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION ON THE TAKING OF 

EVIDENCE ABROAD IN CIVIL OR COMMERCIAL MATTERS 

Having considered Plaintiff Neonode Smartphone LLC’s (“Plaintiff’s”) Motion for 

Issuance of a Letter of Request to Examine Persons and Inspect Documents Pursuant to Hague 

Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters, the Court 

GRANTS the Motion. Accordingly, the Court will execute the submitted Request for International 

Judicial Assistance with an original signature, to which the clerk will affix an original seal. The 

Court will then transmit the executed Request to counsel for Plaintiff who will transmit the Request 

to the appropriate authorities. 

To the extent that leave is necessary, the parties are hereby granted leave to take discovery 

as requested in the Letter of Request. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________ ____________________________

 Honorable Judge Alan D. Albright 

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 39-2 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5466 

To suspend temporarily the duty on acifluorfen. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. PRICE of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on acifluorfen. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACIFLUORFEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Sodium 5-[2-chloro-4- 

(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]- 

2-nitrobenzoate 

(acifluorfen sodium) (CAS 

No. 62476–59–9) (provided for in subheading 

2918.99.20) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5466 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS