alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5658 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Reactive Red 264. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Reactive Red 

264. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REACTIVE RED 264. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5658 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic 

acid, 5-[[4-chloro-6-[[2-[[4- 

chloro-6-[[7-[[4- 

(ethenylsulfonyl)phenyl]azo]-8-hydroxy3,6-disulfo-1- 

naphthalenyl]amino]-1,3,5- 

triazin-2-yl]amino]ethyl](2- 

hydroxyethyl)amino]-1,3,5- 

triazin-2-yl]amino]-3-[[4- 

(ethenylsulfonyl)phenyl]azo]-4-hydroxy-, 

sodium salt (Reactive Red 

264) (CAS No. 171599– 

85–2) (provided for in subheading 3204.16.30) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAREN VANESSA ROJAS

HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 12

- 73752

Agency No. A097

- 808

- 964

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and WATFORD , Circuit Judges.

Karen Vanessa Rojas

- Hernandez , a native and citizen of El Salvador

,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order d enying

her motion to reconsider its prior denial of her motion to reopen removal

proc eedings conducted in absentia. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 21 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 12

- 73752

§ 1252. We review for a buse of discretion the denial of a motion to re consider.

Mohammed v. Gonzales , 400 F.3 d 785, 791

- 92 (9th Cir. 2005). We dismiss in part

and d eny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Rojas

- Hernandez’s challenges to the

agency’s denial of her motion to reopen, because this petition is not timely as to

the BIA’s August 2012 order

. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) ( petition for review must

be filed within 30 days of t he order under review).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Rojas

- Hernandez’s motion

to re consider on the ground that she did not meet her burden to show she provided

an address at which she could be contacted , where all immigration court notices

sent to the address on file were returned as undeliverable

. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) (a motion to reopen in absentia proceedings based on lack of

notice may be filed at any time); 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)(1)(F)(i) ( “the alien must

immediately provide

. . . a written record of an address

. . . at which the alien may

be contacted . . . ”); 8 U.S.C. § 1229(c) (“Service by mail [of a hearing notice]

shall be sufficient if there is proof of attempted delivery to the last address

provided by the alien . . .”)

PETITION FOR REVIEW D ISMISSED in part; DENIED in part

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (1171).                    

*Date and Time:*                         November 8, 2000; 1:00 p.m.—5:00 p.m.; November 9, 2000; 8:30 a.m.—5:00 p.m.                              ( print page 60222)    

*Place:*                         NSF, Room 1235, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Kenneth M. Brown, Executive Secretary; Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, NSF, Suite 905; 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8741.                    

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation on major goals and policies pertaining to SBE programs and activities.                    

*Agenda:*                         Discussions on issues, role and future direction of the NSF Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences.                    

Dated: October 3, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-25820  Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eddie Surdak, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), rendered February 10, 1988, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We disagree with the defendant’s contention that he could not have formed a conscious intent to cause physical injury because of his mental illness, and therefore, that the People failed to adduce legally sufficient evidence of his guilt of assault in the first degree. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 *437NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). While the defendant’s pyschiatric experts testified at trial that he suffered from a "schizo-affective” disorder, the People’s expert diagnosed his condition as a borderline personality disorder, and opined that at the time the defendant stabbed the victim, he had substantial capacity to understand and appreciate the nature and consequences of his conduct, and to know that his conduct was wrong.

As a general rule, where conflicting expert testimony is presented, the question of whether the defendant suffered from a mental disease or defect at the time of the crime is primarily for the jury, which has the right to accept or reject the opinion of any expert *(see, People v Hull,*162 AD2d 550; *People v Enchautegui,*156 AD2d 461; *People v Briecke,*143 AD2d 1025). Where, as here, there is no serious flaw in the testimony of the People’s expert, the resolution of the trier-of-fact on the issue of mental disease or defect will not be disturbed *(see, People v Hull, supra; People v Ludwigsen,*159 AD2d 591).

The sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive under the circumstances of this case *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contention, and find that it is not preserved for appellate review. Eiber, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5400 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on p-Toluenesulfonamide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Ms. HOCHUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on pToluenesulfonamide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. P-TOLUENESULFONAMIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 p-Toluenesulfonamide 

(CAS No. 70–55–3) (provided for in subheading 

2935.00.95) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5400 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC

vs.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.,

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.,

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00535-ADA

ORDER RESETTING TIME OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

 The Court hereby sets and directs the parties, or counsel acting on their behalf, to appear by

phone for a telephone conference on October 16, 2020 at 01:00 PM . Please call (866) 434-5269

with access code 9678090 to be included in the hearing. 

 SIGNED on 16th day of October, 2020.

______________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00535-ADA Document 24 Filed 10/16/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 The undersigned, James C. Mastandrea, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Whitestone REIT (the “Company”), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ James C. MastandreaJames C. MastandreaChairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
 Date:  March 11, 2010
NWF et al Comments on EPA White Papers

To Whom It May Concern:

On behalf of National Wildlife Federation, Environmental Advocates of New York, New Mexico Wildlife 

Federation, Pennfuture, and West Virginia Rivers Coalition, please accept the attached comments on EPA’s 

white papers on methane emissions in the oil and gas sector.

Thank you.

Jim Murphy

National Wildlife Federation

Senior Counsel 

149 State Street

Montpelier, VT 05602

802.552.4325 (Phone); 802.229.4532 (Fax); 802.595.5268 (Cell)

jmurphy@nwf.org

If urgent, cell phone is the best number.

Inspiring Americans to protect wildlife for our children's future.

Read my blog.

Jim Murphy <jmurphy@nwf.org>

Mon 6/16/2014 5:02 PM

To:OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov>; 

 1 attachment

EPA methane WP NWF Comments_FINAL.pdf; 

NWF et al Comments on EPA White Papers - OilandGas.Whitepapers Page 1 of 1

https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/ 8/27/2014
```

[Federal Register: November 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 228)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 72963]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29no10-11]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0594; FRL-9231-9]

 
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Maryland; Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions From 
Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations; Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing the direct final 
rule to approve revisions to Maryland's State Implementation Plan 
(SIP). This SIP revision consists of an addition to Maryland's Volatile 
Organic Compounds from Specific Processes Regulation. Maryland 
Department of the Environment (MDE) adopted standards for industrial 
solvent cleaning operations that satisfy the reasonably available 
control technology (RACT) requirements for sources of volatile organic 
compounds (VOCs) covered by control techniques guidelines (CTG). In the 
direct final rule published on September 29, 2010 (75 FR 59973), we 
stated that if we received any adverse comments by October 29, 2010, 
the rule would be withdrawn and would not take effect. EPA received an 
adverse comment within the comment period. EPA will address the comment 
received in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed action 
also published on September 29, 2010 (75 FR 60013). EPA will not 
institute a second comment period on this action.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 75 FR 59973, September 29, 
2010, is withdrawn as of November 29, 2010.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0594 for 
this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at 
http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at Air Protection Division, 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Lewis, (215) 814-2037, or 
by e-mail at lewis.jacqueline@epa.gov.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Dated: November 16, 2010.
W.C. Early,
Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III.

0
Accordingly, the amendment to the table in 40 CFR 52.1070(c), published 
on September 29, 2010 (75 FR 59973) on page 59975 is withdrawn as of 
November 29, 2010.

[FR Doc. 2010-29815 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit 24.1

Power of Attorney



Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Gregory E. Lawton, Michael J. Bailey and Clive A. Newman, and each of them, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full power of and substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign JohnsonDiversey, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3,
2003 and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits and schedules thereto, and other documents therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and hereby grants unto such attorneys-in-fact and agents full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or his or her substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



This Power of Attorney may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same document.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have
hereunto set their hands as of the 3rd day of April, 2003.



|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    GREGORY E.
LAWTONGregory E. Lawton Chief Executive Officer,President and Director
|                                                                                        
|/S/    CLIVE A.
NEWMANClive
A. Newman Vice Presidentand Corporate Controller            
|                                                                                        
|/S/    TODD C.
BROWNTodd
C. Brown Director                                              
|                                                                                        
|/S/    ROBERT M.
HOWERobert
M. Howe Director                                            
|                                                                                        
|/S/    CLIFTON D.
LOUISClifton D. Louis Director                                        
|                                                                                        
|/S/    RETO
WITTWERReto
Wittwer Director
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

BRYNNE SOUKUP, § 

§ 

Plaintiff, § 

§ 

v. § 1:20-CV-648-RP

§ 

FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. and § 

FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS, LLC, § 

§ 

Defendants. § 

ORDER

 

On September 14, 2021, Defendant Flight Services & Systems, LLC, and Plaintiff Brynne 

Soukup filed a joint and agreed motion to dismiss stating that the parties have resolved their dispute. 

(Dkt. 41). The Court construes the parties’ motion as a joint stipulation of dismissal pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). “Stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) . . . 

require no judicial action or approval and are effective automatically upon filing.” Yesh Music v. 

Lakewood Church, 727 F.3d 356, 362 (5th Cir. 2013). As nothing remains to resolve, IT IS 

ORDERED that the case is CLOSED. 

SIGNED on September 17, 2021. 

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 42 Filed 09/17/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 198 (Thursday, October 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-124]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Space Science Advisory Committee 
(SScAC), Solar System Exploration Subcommittee

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space 
Science Advisory Committee, Solar System Exploration Subcommittee.

DATES: Monday, October 30, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Tuesday, 
October 31, 2000, 8:30 a.m. 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, (IPAC), Conference 
Room 102, in Building 22, 770 South Wilson Road, Pasadena, California 
91125.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay Bergstralh, Code SR, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-
0735.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows:

--Mars Architecture Development
--Europa Mission Update
--Outer Planets Science Strategy
--Pluto Science Drivers
--Future Outer Planets Mission Options

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: October 5, 2000.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-26203 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
### Your Weekly Address

Speeches & Remarks Press Briefings Statements & Releases White House Schedule Presidential Actions Executive Orders Presidential Memoranda Proclamations Legislation Nominations & Appointments Disclosures For Immediate Release June 25, 2013 The White House Office of the Press Secretary Presidential Memorandum -- Power Sector Carbon Pollution Standards |... https://www.whitehouse.gov/the- press-office/2013/06/25/presidential-m...

1 of 5 8/28/2015 2:43 PMPresidential Memorandum -- Power Sector Carbon Pollution Standards |... https://www.whitehouse.gov/the- press-office/2013/06/25/presidential-m...

2 of 5 8/28/2015 2:43 PMPresidential Memorandum -- Power Sector Carbon Pollution Standards |... https://www.whitehouse.gov/the- press-office/2013/06/25/presidential-m...

3 of 5 8/28/2015 2:43 PMPresidential Memorandum -- Power Sector Carbon Pollution Standards |... https://www.whitehouse.gov/the- press-office/2013/06/25/presidential-m...

4 of 5 8/28/2015 2:43 PMView the Full PDF of the President's Climate Action Plan

Watch President Obama's Climate Change Speech HOME BRIEFING ROOM ISSUES THE ADMINISTRATION PARTICIPATE 1600 PENN

En Español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy USA.gov Presidential Memorandum -- Power Sector Carbon Pollution Standards |... https://www.whitehouse.gov/the- press-office/2013/06/25/presidential-m...

5 of 5 8/28/2015 2:43 PM
EXHIBIT 29

Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 111-4 Filed 08/20/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 111-4 Filed 08/20/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 111-4 Filed 08/20/21 Page 3 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 111-4 Filed 08/20/21 Page 4 of 4
Order entered September 11, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00240-CV

TIFFANY POLLARD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE 

MARIE MERKEL CHILDREN’S TRUST, Appellant

V.

RUPERT M. POLLARD, Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-12515

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 10, 2019 unopposed motion for an extension of 

time to file her reply brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to October 17, 2019.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE