[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedman, 121 Ohio St.3d 1222, 2009-Ohio-1352.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FRIEDMAN. 

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedman, 

 121 Ohio St.3d 1222, 2009-Ohio-1352.] 

(No. 2006-2341 — Submitted March 2, 2009 — Decided March 9, 2009.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, Benjamin Stuart Friedman, Attorney 

Registration No. 0074348, last known business address in Kingman, Arizona. 

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 6, 2007, 

wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 

period of two years, with the final six months stayed on conditions, finds that 

respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of 

Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). 

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that respondent is 

placed on probation from the date of this order until October 2010 with the 

following conditions: (1) respondent must successfully complete his Ohio 

Lawyers Assistance Program contract, (2) respondent shall continue to be 

evaluated and follow the course of treatment recommended by a mental health 

professional, (3) respondent shall submit a report from a mental health 

professional certifying that he is fit to practice law, and, (4) respondent shall 

commit no further misconduct. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before thirty days from the date of 

this order relator shall file with the Clerk of this court the name of the attorney 

who will serve as respondent's monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9). It is 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

further ordered that at the end of respondent's probationary period, relator shall 

file with the Clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the 

probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation. 

{¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period 

respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. 

V(9). It is further ordered that respondent's probation shall not be terminated until 

(1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance 

with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders 

issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government 

of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the Clerk of this court a report indicating 

that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court 

orders that the probation be terminated. 

{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified 

copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the 

costs of publication. 

{¶ 7} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedman, 114 Ohio 

St.3d 1, 2007-Ohio-2477, 866 N.E.2d 1076. 

 MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 

______________________