alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2650 

AN ACT 

To allow the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 

in the State of Minnesota to lease or transfer certain land. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2650 EH

1 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL OF CERTAIN 

2 LAND TRANSACTIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sion of law (including regulations), and without further 

5 approval, ratification, or authorization by the United 

6 States, the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 

7 in the State of Minnesota (referred to in this Act as the 

8 ‘‘Band’’) may lease, sell, convey, warrant, or otherwise 

9 transfer all or any portion of the interest of the Band in 

10 any real property that is not held in trust by the United 

11 States for the benefit of the Band. 

12 (b) NO EFFECT ON TRUST LAND.—Nothing in this 

13 Act— 

14 (1) authorizes the Band to lease, sell, convey, 

15 warrant, or otherwise transfer all or any portion of 

16 any interest in any real property that is held in trust 

17 by the United States for the benefit of the Band; or 

18 (2) affects any Federal law (including regula19 tions) relating to leasing, selling, conveying, war-
3 

•HR 2650 EH

1 ranting, or otherwise transferring any interest in the 

2 real property described in paragraph (1). 

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2650 

AN ACT 

To allow the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior 

transfer certain land. Chippewa in the State of Minnesota to lease or
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.5

PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES

                [PHH LOGO]

February 25, 2005

Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.
One Belvedere Place, Suite 330
Mill Valley, CA 94941

HSBC Bank USA
452 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10018

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

Investor number(s)/Deal name(s): 168/ SEQUOIA 2003-6

Dear Investor, Master Servicer or Trustee,

The undersigned officer certifies the following for PHH Mortgage Corp. f/k/a
Cendant Mortgage Corp., for the 2004 calendar year. To the best of our
knowledge:

      a)    The activities and performances of the Servicer during the preceding
            Fiscal year under the terms of the above Servicing Agreement, Trust
            Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer Guide and
            to the best of my knowledge the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
            duties, responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement
            throughout such year, or if there has been default of failure of the
            Servicer to perform any such duties, responsibilities or
            obligations, a description of each default or failure and the
            nature and status thereof has been reported to HSBC Bank USA;

      b)    The Servicer is currently an approved FNMA or FHLMC Servicer in good
            standing;

      c)    The Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions Insurance Policy and any
            other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing Agreement,
            Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer
            Guide are in full force and effect;

      d)    All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood Insurance
            Policy (if applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if
            applicable), with respect to each Mortgaged Property, have been paid
            and that such insurance policies are in full force and effect;

      e)    All real estate taxes, governmental assessments and any other
            expenses accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or
            encumbrance on any Mortgage Property, have been paid, or if any such
            costs or expenses have been paid with respect to any Mortgaged
            Property, the reason for the non-payment has been reported to HSBC
            Bank USA;

      f)    All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded;
            and

      g)    All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgaged
            Property required persection 6050H, 6050J and 6050P of the Internal
            Revenue Code, respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified by

/s/ William E. Fricke, Jr.
--------------------------
William E. Fricke, Jr.
Assistant Vice President
Date: February 25, 2005
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

SHOLA MCCARTHY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3232 ) STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 24, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Wayne M. Durden, Judge. Shola McCarthy, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. Jensen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 38 Filed 06/15/21 Page 1 of 3
Thomas

P. Marotta

Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 38 Filed 06/15/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:20-cv-00648-RP Document 38 Filed 06/15/21 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5594 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5594

      To suspend temporarily the duty on plastic mesh for filters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Ellison introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on plastic mesh for filters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLASTIC MESH FOR FILTERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Woven mesh of       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          perfluoroalkoxy                                                   12/31/2015
                          copolymer resin
                          with fibers
                          measuring 100 to
                          120 microns in
                          diameter, for use
                          in manufacturing
                          filters of
                          heading 8421
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          5407.71.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Pilot In Command & Visual Observer Training Procedures

Candidate Review

# Overview

 

### Initial Qualifications Check  Pilot’s License/Certificate, Medical, Valid Driver’s License?  

### In
-Person Interview  Mental Check

 Establish an understanding for the importance of both the PIC and VO Roles  Discussion of the responsibilities assigned to each role  

### PIC & VO

– Training Seminar  What is perception?  How is it influenced?  Strategies of Observance  

### Classroom Training  Introduction to the Role  Responsibilities Review  Terminology  FAA Regulation Review for Applicable Airspace  COA Provisions Review  

### Flight Training  Beginner Flight Training  Real World Simulations

# Initial Qualifications Check

 

## Initial Qualifications Check  

### Preliminary check to make sure PIC and VO meet qualification standards  

### Pilot In Command  AT LEAST
- Pilot’s License/Certificate and a Valid Driver’s License  

### Visual Observer  AT LEAST
- Valid Driver’s License

# In
- Person Interview

 

## Mental Check  

### Establish an understanding of the importance of the roles  

### Why are PIC’s & VO’s necessary?  

### Why do they need training?  

### PIC’s & VO’s are crewmembers  

### Mission
-Critical Responsibilities  Assessment of airspace  Air traffic  Obstacles  Flight Hazards  

### Ensure the safety of sUAS flights  Avoid manned aircraft  Prevent accidents with obstacles

# Visual Observance

– Learning Seminar

 

## Learning Objectives  

### Challenges to human visual perception  

### Limits of human visual perception  

### Describe how orientation, context, and extraneous cues impact our visual 

### perception  

### Describe how relative motion, altered light angles, contrast, and loss of depth cues can impact visual perception

# Classroom Training

 

## Classroom

– PowerPoint and/or Video Training Module  

### Introduction to the Role  What is a Pilot In Command/What is a Visual Observer?  

### Responsibilities Review  Ensure the Safety of the Flights  

### Terminology  Return to Home  Land Immediately  Avoidance Dive  

### FAA Regulation Review for Applicable Airspace  Right of Way  Weather Minimums  Operations near other aircraft  

### Aircraft/Operating General Rules Review  Height, Weight, Speed, Proximity Rules, etc.

# Flight Training

 

## Pilot In Command/Visual Observer Joint Operations  

### Review Pre
- Flight Checklists  

### Review Aircraft Maintenance  

### Review Weather Minimum Rules and make current weather observation  

### Review flight logs and log the flights  

### Take
-Offs & Landings  

### In
-Flight Operations and Communication  

### Evasive Maneuvers  

### Emergency Action Plan Steps and Execution
Exhibit 32.1  Rival Technologies Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned officer of Rival Technologies Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:   July 6, 2007/s/ Robin J. Harvey
Robin J. Harvey
Principal Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

March 29, 2004


        Management Report on Internal Control over the administration of
       the Chase Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2002-4 (the "Owner Trust")

Management of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the "Bank") is responsible for
establishing and maintaining effective internal control over its Administration
of the Certificates held by the Owner Trust and the Notes issued by the Owner
Trust ("Administration" of the Owner Trust), which is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the proper Administration of the Owner Trust. The
Bank's internal control system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions
are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in any internal control, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls.
Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to Administration of the Owner Trust. Further, because of
changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

Management of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. assessed its internal control over
its Administration of the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003 in relation to the
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management
believes that Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained effective internal
control over the Administration of the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003,
based on the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ Keith Schuck
-------------------------
Keith Schuck
Senior Vice President/CFO
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.

/s/ Patricia Garvey
-------------------------
Patricia Garvey
Senior Vice President
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5101 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain AC electric motors of an output 

exceeding 37.5 W but not exceeding 72 W designed to be operated 

by means of an infrared remote control. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. GERLACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain AC electric motors 

of an output exceeding 37.5 W but not exceeding 72 

W designed to be operated by means of an infrared 

remote control. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN AC ELECTRIC MOTORS OF AN OUT4 PUT EXCEEDING 37.5 W BUT NOT EXCEEDING 

5 72 W DESIGNED TO BE OPERATED BY MEANS 

6 OF AN INFRARED REMOTE CONTROL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5101 IH

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 AC electric motors of an 

output exceeding 37.5 W 

but not exceeding 72 W, 

single phase, each equipped 

with a capacitor, a motor 

mount of plastics, a selfcontained gear mechanism 

for oscillation, and a speed 

control mechanism designed to be operated by 

means of an infrared remote control (provided for 

in subheading 8501.40.20) 1% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document

AMENDMENT NO. 3 
TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN 
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION 
AND ROBIN HAYES


This AMENDMENT NO. 3 (the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement, dated February 16, 2015 and amended on February 16, 2017 and on February 13, 2020 (collectively, the “Prior Agreement”), by and between JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and ROBIN HAYES (the “Executive”), is hereby entered into this 5th day of September 2021.


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive previously entered into the Prior Agreement; and


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to provide for the continued employment of the Executive on the terms and conditions contained in the Prior Agreement, as modified by this Amendment;


NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:


1. Section 2 of the Prior Agreement is replaced in its entirety by the following:


“2.    Term of Employment. The Executive’s employment under this Agreement commenced on February 16, 2015 (the “Effective Date”). On September 5, 2021, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) exercised its discretion to extend the initial term of the Agreement (the “Term”), such that this Agreement shall terminate on the earlier of (i) September 1, 2023 or (ii) the termination of the Executive’s employment under this Agreement.”


2. All remaining terms of the Prior Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, as amended hereby.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer pursuant to the authority of its Board, and the Executive has executed this Amendment, as of the date set forth above.


			
	JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION
	
	



By: /s/ Laurie Villa                

	Name: Laurie Villa
	Chief People Officer






									
	EXECUTIVE	
			
	



By: /s/ Robin Hayes            
	
	Name: Robin Hayes	
	Dated: September 5, 2021
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R.47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-20027

Summary Calendar

 

DAVID ALLEN MARTIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-CV-464

 

September 10, 2002

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Allen Martin (Martin) appeals the district court’s

dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of his Social

Security Act case. He maintains that the district court erred when

it concluded that he had not asserted a constitutional claim

sufficient to establish jurisdiction.

This court conducts a de novo review of a Rule 12(b)(1) lack
2

of subject matter jurisdiction dismissal and applies the same

standard used by the district court. Ramming v. United States, 281

F.3d 158, 161 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S.Ct. 2665 (2002).

When, as in this case, a litigant fails to object to the magistrate

judge’s report and recommendation, which contains a clear statement

of the consequences of failing to object, this court may review the

district court’s decision for plain error. See Douglas v. United

Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en

banc). Jurisdictional questions, however, such as those presented

by Martin, cannot be waived and may be raised at any time. See

United States v. Lopez-Vasquez, 227 F.3d 476, 482 n.11 (5th Cir.

2000). Because the district court’s decision was appropriate under

either standard, we decline to choose between them. Id.

Martin seeks review of a Social Security Administration

decision not to reopen prior proceedings and that res judicata

precluded relitigation of the issues Martin raised. This decision

is not subject to judicial review unless challenged on

constitutional grounds. See Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99, 107-

09 (1977). A claimant must make a colorable claim of a

constitutional violation to vest a court with jurisdiction to

review a refusal to reopen or a res judicata determination by the

Administration. See Robertson v. Bowen, 803 F.3d 808, 810 (5th

Cir. 1986). Martin has failed to assert anything other than a

conclusory allegation of a constitutional violation and thus has
3

failed to comply with the directive set forth in Robertson.

We fail to discern any error, plain or otherwise, in the

district court’s decision. Finding no error, we AFFIRM.
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Technology Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Seth Gambee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:  1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /S/ SETH GAMBEE Seth Gambee Chief Financial Officer April 15, 2009 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

David Duane Bryant, Appellant

No. 06-21-00152-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of 

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 29164). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Stevens and Justice 

van Cleef participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, David Duane Bryant, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 8, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA), INC. 

and ZTE (TX), INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00487-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00488-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00489-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00490-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00491-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00492-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00493-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00494-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00495-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00496-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00497-ADA

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

Defendants ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA), Inc. and ZTE (TX), Inc., (collectively

“ZTE”), notify the Court and the parties of the appearance of Bradford C. Schulz as counsel on 

its behalf. Defendants respectfully request that Mr. Schulz, who is enrolled in the Court’s 

CM/ECF system and whose contact information is set forth below, be included on the Court’s 

and parties’ service lists. 

DATED: July 2, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

/s/Bradford C. Schulz 

Bradford C. Schulz

Virginia Bar No. 91,057

bradford.schulz@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

1875 Explorer Street, Suite 800

Reston, VA 20190

Phone: (571) 203-2700

Fax: (202) 408-4400

Attorney for Defendants, 

ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA), Inc.,

ZTE (TX), Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system on July 2, 2021. 

/s/Bradford C. Schulz 

Bradford C. Schulz