alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

May 12, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00268

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.R. AND S.M.R. , Childr en ,
From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- PA

- 00858 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal. Although the reporter’s record was due on May 9, 2016 , no reporter’s record has been filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1(b)

. We, therefore, ORDER the court reporter to file the reporter’s record on or before May 23, 2016.

If the reporter ’ s record is not received by such date, an order may be issued directing the court reporter to appear and show cause why she should not be held in contempt for failing to file the record. No motions for extension of time will be granted absent extenuating circumstances. See id. 35.3(c).

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 12th day of May, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2013 -**  **0980**
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of
Worldwide Biotech & Pharmaceutical Company (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wenxia Guo, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                   |                                                  
|------------------ | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: Nov 14, 2005 | /s/ Wenxia Guo
Wenxia Guo
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1503
JERRY W. GOINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM R. ENDICOTT, D.D.S.; ENDICOTT DENTAL CARE, Defendants - Appellees, and TOMMY MURPH, DMD, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-95-3922-4-22) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry W. Goings, Appellant Pro Se. Ruskin C. Foster, MCKAY, MCKAY, HENRY & FOSTER, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Jerry Goings appeals the district court's orders (1) entering judgment upon the jury's verdict in favor of the Defendants on his medical malpractice action and (2) denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Goings claims that the district court erred by excluding evidence pertaining to a prior conviction of Defendant William Endicott. Our review of the record discloses no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Hassan-El , 5 F.3d 726,731 (4th Cir. 1993) (district court's evidentiary rulings are reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Amendment to Service and Operations Agreement ("Agreement")
          Between Churchill U.S.A., Inc. ("CUSA") and Summit Overseas
          Exploration, Inc. ("Summit")


          Item 8.   Fees.     To be amended as follows:

                    (a)  Summit will pay CUSA  based on the monthly average
                         of the three preceding  months actual net payments
                         made  by Summit  to  CUSA (net  of any  reimbursed
                         costs from  CUSA back to Summit)  for each ensuing
                         calendar month on or before the  first day of each
                         calendar month  for  services to  be performed  by
                         CUSA during that month.

                    (b)  CUSA will submit an invoice  to Summit of its cost
                         plus five percent (5%) (the "Costs") for the month
                         in which services are  provided.  Should the Costs
                         be less than the computed average of the preceding
                         three  months, Summit will  be reimbursed  for the
                         difference  between the  Costs  and  the  computed
                         average of the preceding three months on or before
                         the  end of the following month.  Should the Costs
                         exceed the computed average of the preceding three
                         months amount, Summit will not be obligated to pay
                         such.  Any Costs in excess of the computed average
                         of the preceding three months amount will be borne
                         by CUSA.

          All other items within  the Agreement remain intact and  in force
          pursuant to the terms set forth in the Agreement.

          Amendment agreed to and accepted this 15th day of June, 1995:

                                        Churchill U.S.A., Inc.
                                        a Colorado Corporation





          By:/s/ Kellie M. Clark        By:/s/ Wendy A. Cribari       
             Secretary (Assistant)                President


                                        Summit Overseas Exploration, Inc.
                                        a Nevada Corporation



          By:/s/ Kimberley J. Love      By:/s/ Anthony J. Carroll     
             Secretary                            President
<PAGE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5388 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Solvent Yellow 131. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Ms. FUDGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Solvent Yellow 

131. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SOLVENT YELLOW 131. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Solvent Yellow 131 (CAS 

No. 52821–24–6) (provided for in subheading 

3204.19.25) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5388 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2650 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2650

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To allow the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa in the State of 
              Minnesota to lease or transfer certain land.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL OF CERTAIN LAND TRANSACTIONS.
    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law 
(including regulations), and without further approval, ratification, or 
authorization by the United States, the Fond du Lac Band of Lake 
Superior Chippewa in the State of Minnesota (referred to in this Act as 
the ``Band'') may lease, sell, convey, warrant, or otherwise transfer 
all or any portion of the interest of the Band in any real property 
that is not held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the 
Band.
    (b) No Effect on Trust Land.--Nothing in this Act--
        (1) authorizes the Band to lease, sell, convey, warrant, or 
    otherwise transfer all or any portion of any interest in any real 
    property that is held in trust by the United States for the benefit 
    of the Band; or
        (2) affects any Federal law (including regulations) relating to 
    leasing, selling, conveying, warranting, or otherwise transferring 
    any interest in the real property described in paragraph (1).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
AO 399 (01/09) Waiver of the Service of Summons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To:

(Name of the plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint,

two copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within

60 days from , the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the

United States). If I fail to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date:

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Printed name of party waiving service of summons Printed name

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons

and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff located in

the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure.

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the plaintiff

and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been served.

 Western District of Texas JACK MILLER, et al. CHIEF JOSEPH SALVAGGIO, et al. 20-cv-00642 Solomon M. Radner 06/30/2020 06/30/2020City of Kirby Patrick C. Bernal / Adolfo Ruiz 

2517 N. Main Avenue 

San Antonio, Texas 78212 pbernal@rampagelaw.com / aruiz@rampagelaw.com

Case 5:20-cv-00642-JKP Document 6 Filed 06/30/20 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mariano Lepore, Appellant.

County Court, Rensselaer County,

April 9, 1957,

*James II. Doran*for appellant.

*John T. Casey, District*Attorney, for respondent.

De Forest C. Pitt, J.

The defendant was convicted in a Court of Special Sessions of the Town of East Greenbush, Rensselaer County, New York, on January 7, 1957, for a violation of subdivision 4 of section 56 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law of the State of New York. The defendant appeals from this conviction and from the fine of $30 imposed thereon.

A certified copy of a State Traffic Commission order restricting the speed to 35 miles per hour was offered and received in evidence by the trial court. No evidence was offered on behalf of the People that signs had been erected and maintained in accordance with the standards of the State Traffic Commission to inform the public of the existence and limits of the 35 miles per hour speed restriction established along the State highway in question.

It is this court’s opinion that the erection of these signs is a condition precedent to the enforcement of the State Traffic Commission order that the speed of motor vehicles be reduced to 35 miles per hour. Proof of the erection and maintenance of these signs must be given by the People if this conviction is to *388be sustained. The transcript of the testimony of the People’s only witness does not show that this proof was offered.

Judgment of conviction is, therefore, reversed, fine remitted and a new trial ordered.

Submit accordingly.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                                                                    PO Box 84013
                                                          Columbus GA 31908-4013
                                                               Tel. 800.784.5566

                                                      [GREENPOINT MORTGAGE LOGO]

TO : RWT HOLDINGS, INC.

      Re : Annual Statement as to Compliance by the Seller

      Pursuant to Section 6.04 of the Mortgage Loan Flow Purchase, Sale, and.
Servicing Agreement between GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. as Seller (the
"Seller") and RWT Holdings, Inc. as Purchaser, dated as of August 1, 2002 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned officer of the Seller, hereby certifies as to the
following:

            (i) a review of the activities of the Seller during the calendar
      year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Applicable Period") and of the Seller's
      performance under the Agreement has been made under the direct supervision
      of the undersigned officer; and

            (ii) to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such
      review, the Seller has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      Agreement throughout the Applicable Period, and there has been no known
      default in the fulfillment of the Seller's obligations throughout such
      Applicable Period.

                                           Very Truly Yours

                                           GREENPOINT MORTGAGE
                                           FUNDING, INC.
                                           as Seller

                                           /s/ Roy Briggs
                                           --------------------
                                           Name: Roy Briggs
                                           Title: Vice President

                AVISO IMPORTANTE PARA LAS PERSONAS HABLA ESPANOL
       Si usted no entiendo el contenido de esta carts por favor obtongu
                            una traduccion immediamente
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  2300 BROOKSTONE CENTRE PKWY COLUMBUS GA 31904
       CUSTOMER SERVICE HOURS: MONDAY - FRIDAY, 8:30 AM - 8:00 PM, EASTERN
                            WWW.GREENPOINTSERVICE.COM
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elizabeth Arden, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Scott Beattie, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Stephen J. Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(i)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Date:  October 30, 2009 |  | /s/ E. Scott Beattie                                                 
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |                                                                      
|                        |  | E. Scott Beattie
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer     
|                        |  |                                                                      
|                        |  |                                                                      
|Date:  October 30, 2009 |  | /s/ Stephen J. Smith                                                 
|                        |  |                                                                      
|                        |  | Stephen J. Smith
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  |                                                                      





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Larrea BioSciences Corporation, formerly
known as Sonic Media Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Peter P. Smetek, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                Date: April 7, 2006

                                                /s/ Peter P. Smetek, Jr.
                                                ------------------------
                                                Peter P. Smetek, Jr.,
                                                Chief Executive Officer
#### Crider *v.*Crider.

Practice, *Supreme Court*— Appeals—Findings *of fact.*

Where upon petition for a rule to vacate a judgment and set aside a verdict (entered by agreement) in an action of ejectment, a finding of the lower court that the averments of fraud were false, and that the verdict was properly taken, is supported by evidence, an appeal from an order discharging the rule will be affirmed.

Argued Oct. 13, 1915.

January 3, 1916:

Appeal, No. 124, Oct. T., 1915, by Ella B. Crider, from final order of the District Court, now Common Pleas Court, Allegheny Co., July T., 1871, No. 3, discharging rule to set aside a, verdict in an action of ejectment, in case of John Crider, et al., v. William H. Crider.

Before Brown, C. J., Mestrezat, Potter, Stewart and Frazer, JJ.

Affirmed.

Buie to vacate a judgment and set aside a verdict rendered by agreement in an action of ejectment. Before Macfarlane, J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.

The court discharged the rule. Ella B. Crider appealed.

*Error assigned*was in discharging the rule.

*George J. Campbell,*with him *George O. Colder*and *Walter 8. Lobingier,*for appellant.

*John E. Winner,*with him *John N. English,*for appellees.

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from the refusal of the court below to set aside a verdict taken by agreement and to strike off the judgment entered on it. The court found from testimony taken before a commissioner that the averments *544of fraud in appellant’s petition to have the verdict set aside and the judgment stricken oft were false and that the verdict had been properly taken. This finding was amply justified, and the appeal is, therefore, dismissed at appellant’s costs.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Western District of Texas

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

6:20-CV-454-ADA

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

09/03/2020 /s/ Michael J. Bettinger

Michael J. Bettinger, CA 122196

Sidley Austin LLP

555 California Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA, 94104

mbettinger@sidley.com

(415) 772-1200

(415) 772-7400

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 16 Filed 09/03/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 3rd day of September, 2020, I 

electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the 

Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send notificationof such filing to all 

counsel of record who are registered to receive electronic notices.

/s/ Michael J. Bettinger

MICHAEL J. BETTINGER

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 16 Filed 09/03/20 Page 2 of 2