alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
59402 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 194 / Thursday, October 5, 2000 / Notices

[FR Doc. 00–25577 Filed 10–4–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–C

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Defense Science Board

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee

meetings.

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board

(DSB) Task Force on High Energy Laser

Weapon Systems Applications will meet

in closed session on October 19–20,

2000, at Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601

Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22201.

The mission of the Defense Science

Board is to advise the Secretary of

Defense and the Under Secretary of

Defense for Acquisition, Technology &

Logistics on scientific and technical

matters as they affect the perceived

needs of the Department of Defense. At

this meeting, the Task Force will review

on-going or proposed programs in high

energy laser (HEL) applications;

examine recent supporting technology

advancements and their applications

with respect to supporting military HEL

weapon system developments; develop

potential military and strategic HEL

system applications and identify

processes required to implement these

potentials; determine what needs to be

done to ‘‘weaponize’’ these systems; and

assess HEL operational concepts,

impacts and limitations, considering

legal, treaty and policy issues

concerning HEL employment.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act,

Public. Law. 92–463, as amended (5

U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has been

determined that these Defense Science

Board meetings, concern matters listed

in 5 U.S.C. § 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that

accordingly these meetings will be

closed to the public.

Dated: October 2, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00–25573 Filed 10–4–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

U.S. Strategic Command Strategic

Advisory Group

AGENCY: Department of Defense,

USSTRATCOM.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Strategic Advisory Group

(SAG) will meet in closed session on

November 2 and 3, 2000. The mission

of the SAG is to provide timely advice

on scientific, and policy-related issues

to the Commander in Chief, U.S.

Strategic Command, during the

development of the nation’s strategic

war plans.

At this meeting, the SAG will discuss

strategic issues that relate to the

development of the Single Integrated

Operational Plan (SIOP). Full

development of the topics will require

discussion of information classified

TOP SECRET in accordance with

Executive Order 12958, April 17, 1995.

Access to this information must be

strictly limited to personnel having

requisite security clearances and

specific need-to-know. Unauthorized

disclosure of the information to be

discussed at the SAG meeting could
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 22, 2020 s0519

Order 

Clerk

May 22, 2020

161306-7 & (152)(153)(154)(155)(156)

GREAT LAKES CAPITAL FUND FOR 

HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP XII,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161306-7

COA: 349763; 349931

Saginaw CC: 18-035570-CB

ERWIN COMPANIES, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

STACY ERWIN OAKES,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED, in 

part, to the extent that they seek expedited review of the application and the other 

motions. The request for a stay of proceedings is DENIED. The application for leave to 

appeal the May 5, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, 

because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this 

Court. The motions for miscellaneous relief are DENIED.
#### SESSUMS v. STATE.

No. 24543.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 14, 1949.

E. A. Blair, Lubbock, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty.,. of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a violation of the local- liquor laws in Lubbock County, and under a complaint and information charging him as a third offender, he was fined the sum of $1250, and given a term of 90 days in jail. He appeals from a judgment thereunder.

Complaint is made relative to the charge of the court in that appellant 'was charged as a third offender, it being alleged that in 1945 and 1947, he was in each instance convicted of an offense of like character, and that thereafter, in 1949; he committed the present offense. The trial court, in order to instruct the jury as to the consideration to be given to the two preceding convictions and to inform them that such convictions could only be used in determining the amount of punishment relative to each such prior conviction, gave the following charge: “The allegation that the defendant was duly and, legally convicted on the 21st day of February, 1945, in the County Court of Lubbock County, Texas, of an offense of like character is no evidence of the guilt of the defendant in this case now on trial, and is not to be considered by you as evidence o,f such guilt, for you are instructed as a. matter of law that the defendant must be found guilty of having heretofore, to-wit: on or about March 28, 1949, of committing the crime of transporting an alcoholic beverage, to-wit: whiskey, in a dry area, to-wit: Lubbock County, Texas, and such guilt of the defendant must be established by legal and competent testimony to your satisfaction beyond a reasonable doubt.”

To the same effect as the above a similar charge was given relative to the charged prior offense in 1947. ,

These charges were timely objected to as being on the weight of the evidence, and appellant requested the court to give the following charge to the jury: “Gentlemen of the Jury, in this,case the State has introduced evidence' to the effect that the defendant has been convicted of two prior offenses of like character. You are instructed that you cannot consider these two prior offenses in passing upon his guilt *420or innocence in this case, but can only consider the evidence of the two prior offenses of like character, if you consider it at all, in arriving at the amount of punishment you assess in the event you find him guilty of the present offense.”

We are of the opinion that the charge complained of was upon the weight of the evidence, and being timely objected to and a proper charge relative thereto having been submitted to and by the court refused, we think the court was in error.

The judgment will therefore be reversed and the cause remanded.
#### Ex parte WILLIS.

No. 24872.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 10, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Relator, in original application to this court, alleges that he is illegally restrained of his liberty because he has served his full sentence of three years, received in Bexar County on June 23, 1948. It is also shown that he received a three year sentence in Wilbarger County on July 2, 1948. No claim is made in the petition that his prison record is such as to give him credit sufficient to have satisfied either of these sentences.

This court will not take evidence in a matter of this character unless substantial allegations are made raising a question which, if settled according to relator’s contention, would warrant the relief prayed for.

Attached to relator’s application is a certified copy of the sentence in Cause No. 4496, State of Texas v. L. B. Willis, in Wilbarger County. A paragraph attempting to make this sentence cumulative with some other sentence reads as follows: “And this sentence is here made accumulative with the sentence in the District Court of Bexar County, Texas, as where he was sentenced as Leonard B. Willis, or with any other sentence that he may have received. It shall not be concurrent.”

Under the many decisions of this court, the description of the sentence to which the one before us should be cumulative is not sufficient to identify the same with that degree of certainty which will direct the penitentiary authorities in its observation. See Bland v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 267, 167 S.W.2d 761. This indefiniteness seems to be relied upon by relator as grounds for his discharge. While we think it is not effective, the application for writ of ■habeas corpus is refused because no ground is alleged which would authorize evidence in support of the application.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of the Secretary

In order to comply with the mandate of section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of countries which may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

On the basis of the best information currently available to the Department of the Treasury, the following countries may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986): Bahrain, Iraz, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates, Republic of Yemen.

Dated: September 29, 2000. 

Philip West,

International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).

[FR Doc. 00-25758  Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5565 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5565

To reduce temporarily the duty on mixtures containing Imidacloprid and 
                 Cyfluthrin or its b-Cyfluthrin isomer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mrs. Capito introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce temporarily the duty on mixtures containing Imidacloprid and 
                 Cyfluthrin or its b-Cyfluthrin isomer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING IMIDACLOPRID AND CYFLUTHRIN OR ITS B-
              CYFLUTHRIN ISOMER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Mixtures            Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          containing 1-[(6-                                                 12/31/2015
                          Chloro-3-
                          pyridinyl)methyl]-
                          N-nitro-2-
                          imidazolidinimine
                          ) (Imidacloprid)
                          (CAS No. 138261-
                          41-3) and (R)-
                          cyano-(4-fluoro-3-
                          phenoxy)phenyl)me
                          thyl (1R,3R)-3-
                          (2,2-
                          dichloroethenyl)-
                          2,2-
                          dimethylcycloprop
                          ane-1-carboxylate
                          (cyfluthrin) (CAS
                          68359-37-5) or
                          its beta-
                          cyfluthrin isomer
                          (RS)-a-cyano-4-
                          fluro-3-
                          phenoxybenzyl-
                          (1RS,3RS;1RS,3SR)-
                          2-(2,2-
                          dichlorovinyl)-
                          2,2-
                          dimethylcycloprop
                          anecarboxylate,
                          including
                          application
                          adjuvants
                          provided for in
                          subheading
                          3808.91.25.......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 11-1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 11-1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 11-1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 3 of 3
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Western District of Texas

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

6:20-CV-458-ADA

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

09/03/2020 /s/ Richard A. Cederoth

Richard A. Cederoth, IL 6185199

Sidley Austin LLP

1 S Dearborn

Chicago, IL, 60603

rcederoth@sidley.com

(312) 853-7000

(312) 853-7036

Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 17 Filed 09/03/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 3rd day of September, 2020, I 

electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the 

Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send notificationof such filing to all 

counsel of record who are registered to receive electronic notices.

/s/ Richard A. Cederoth

RICHARD A. CEDEROTH

Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 17 Filed 09/03/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5603 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5603

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Copoly(acrylic acid/itaconic 
                                 acid).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Ellison introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Copoly(acrylic acid/itaconic 
                                 acid).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COPOLY(ACRYLIC ACID/ITACONIC ACID).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Copoly(acrylic      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          acid/itaconic                                                     12/31/2015
                          acid) (CAS No.
                          25948-33-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3906.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cytation Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Fisher, Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard
Fisher                    Richard
FisherChairman of the Board and Chief Financial Officer

August 1, 2005
AO 399 (01/09) Waiver of the Service of Summons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To:

(Name of the plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint,

two copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within

60 days from , the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the

United States). If I fail to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date:

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Printed name of party waiving service of summons Printed name

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons

and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff located in

the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure.

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the plaintiff

and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been served.

 Western District of Texas JACK MILLER, et al. CHIEF JOSEPH SALVAGGIO, et al. 20-cv-00642 Solomon M. Radner 06/30/2020 06/30/2020 City of Leon Valley Patrick C. Bernal / Adolfo Ruiz 

2517 N. Main Avenue 

San Antonio, Texas 78212 pbernal@rampagelaw.com / aruiz@rampagelaw.com

Case 5:20-cv-00642-JKP Document 7 Filed 06/30/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Charles M. Weaver, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Motorola Debenture-Backed
          Series 2002-12 Trust (the "Trust") and all reports on Form 8-K
          containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report of the Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
          pooling and servicing or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
          reports is included in these reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the Depositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its
          obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2006


         /s/ CHARLES M. WEAVER
----------------------------------------
Charles M. Weaver, Senior Vice President