alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00456-ADA

ORDER RESETTING MARKMAN MARKMAN HEARING HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is reset for

MARKMAN HEARING by zoomoom on Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 10:00 AM.

reset

IT 22nd day of March, 2021.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 57 Filed 03/22/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25861]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-611-000]


Sea Robin Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

October 3, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Sea Robin Pipeline Company 
(Sea Robin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet to be 
effective November 1, 2000:

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 30a

    Sea Robin states that the purpose of this filing, made in 
accordance with the provisions of Section 154.204 of the Commission's 
Regulations, is to reflect a reduction in the standard fuel percentage 
in Section 5.1(b) of the General Terms and Conditions.
    Sea Robin further states that copies of this filing are being 
served on all affected customers and applicable state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-25861 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1153

RICHARD A. PATTERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE CITY OF COLUMBIA, a municipality of the

State of South Carolina; PAUL MEAD, Detective;

G. STINNEY, Officer; JOE CRONIN, Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-02-2336-3)

Submitted: June 24, 2004 Decided: June 29, 2004

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard A. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Gordon Cooper,

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, David Leon

Morrison, Matthew Blain Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN,

P.A., Columbia, South Carolina for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Richard A. Patterson appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Patterson v. The

City of Columbia, No. CA-02-2336-3 (D.S.C. Dec. 29, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
                     The Standard Register Company

                       Financial Data Schedule


This schedule contains summary financial information from The
Standard Register Company for the six months ended September 29,
1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                                87,849
<SECURITIES>                                           1,215
<RECEIVABLES>                                        159,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                           5,944
<INVENTORY>                                           81,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     340,071
<PP&E>                                               385,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                       151,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       585,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 89,257
<BONDS>                                                8,322
<COMMON>                                              28,922
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                           418,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         585,033
<SALES>                                              697,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     699,878
<CGS>                                                431,509
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        622,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       1,145
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       77,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                          31,444
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   45,714
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                          45,714
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           1.59
        

</TABLE>
| Date   | February      4, 2010 |   | /S/      Douglas A. Starrett                              |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                  |   | Douglas      A. StarrettChief      Executive Officer      |
|   |                  |   |                                                      |
| Date   | February      4, 2010 |   | /S/      Francis J. O’Brien                         |
|   |                  |   | Francis      J. O’BrienChief      Financial Officer |

----
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               EXHIBIT 11

                         THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER-SHARE EARNINGS
                          (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER-SHARE DATA)

                         CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


                                                                    THREE MONTHS
                                                                   ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                           ------------------------------
                                                                1997             1996
                                                           -------------    -------------
<S>                                                        <C>              <C>
Net earnings  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  $      5,522     $      5,489
Add interest on Convertible Debt, net of tax * .  .  .  .          -                -
                                                           -------------    -------------
Net earnings applicable to common stock and
    equivalents outstanding  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  $      5,522     $      5,489
                                                           =============    =============

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding .  .       409,923          409,923
Weighted average number of common shares issuable
    upon conversion of Convertible Debt *.  .  .  .  .  .          -                -
                                                           -------------    -------------
Weighted average number of common shares and
   equivalents outstanding.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .       409,923          409,923
                                                           =============    =============

Net earnings per common share and equivalents
    (Primary and Fully Diluted) .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .          $.01             $.01
                                                                   =====            =====


*  The Convertible Quarterly Income Debt Securities are common stock equivalents but are not 
included in the first quarter earnings per share calculations because they have an antidilutive 
effect.  While the first quarter 1996 earnings per share calculations ($.02 as previously 
reported) have been restated, this issue only affects the first quarter calculation and no other 
1996 earnings per share calculations will require restatement.
</TABLE>


                                            Tab 1
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DOUGLAS L. JAMES, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-266 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed July 6, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, Judge. Douglas L. James, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Smith v. State, 537 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 1989); Hart v. State, 464 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

The next meeting of the Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for October 19, 2000, at 10 a.m., in the Commission's offices at the National Building Museum (Pension Building), Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 441 F Street, NW., Washington, DC, 20001-2728. Items of discussion will include designs for projects affecting the appearance of Washington, DC, including buildings and parks.

Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be addressed to Charles H. Atherton, Secretary, Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.

Dated in Washington, DC, October 2, 2000.

Charles H. Atherton,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26098  Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
GMAC

Commercial Mortgage

 

 

Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance

                                           With Minimum Master Servicing Standards

March 17, 2003

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation has complied, in all material respects, with the minimum master servicing standards set forth in the Company's master servicing standards (Exhibit B), which were derived from the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers.

As master servicer for the transactions included in Exhibit A, the Company performs certain functions with respect to loan servicing, however, other servicing functions are  performed by various subservicers.

As of December 31, 2002, the company was covered by various General Motors Corporation insurance policies providing $400 million of fidelity bond insurance and $400 million of errors and omissions insurance.

 

Robert D. Feller

Robert D. Feller

Chief Executive Officer

 

Wayne D.  Hoch

Wayne D.  Hoch

Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
*Michael I. Lipson

Michael I. Lipson

Executive Vice President, Global Servicing

 

200 Witmer Road P.O. Box 1015 Horsham, PA 19044 8015*
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5656 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on methyl-4-trifluoro 

methoxyphenyl-N-(chlorocarbonyl) carbamate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on methyl4-trifluoro methoxyphenyl-N-(chlorocarbonyl) carbamate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METHYL-4-TRIFLUORO METHOXYPHENYL-N4 (CHLOROCARBONYL) CARBAMATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.91 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 methyl-4-trifluoro methoxyphenyl-N-(chlorocarbonyl) car8 bamate) is amended by striking the date in the effective 

9 period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5656 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Re:	Petition	for	Amendment	to	Add	Aircraft	to	Exemption	No.	#	12315	Issued	to	

AirFrame	LLC	(Regulatory	Docket	No.	FAA-2015-1710

Dear	Sir	or	Madam:

AirFrame	LLC	was	granted	exemption	(Exemption	No.	12315,	Docket	No.	FAA-2015-

1710)	to	use	UAS	for	aerial	data	collection	using	the	DJI	S800	and	Tarot	680Pro.		

AirFrame	LLC	requests	for	an	amendment	to	that	exemption	to	add	the	DJI	Inspire	1,	

DJI	Phantom	3,	Tarot	650	and	Tarot	810	aircraft.		AirFrame	LLC	agrees	to	operate	

these	aircraft	under	the	same	restrictions	in	the	exemption.

These aircraft	have	been	previously	granted	in	other	exemptions	and	would	not	set	

any	precedent.		All	proposed	aircraft	are	of	the	same	or	smaller	size	and	weight	as	

the	DJI	S800	and	would	utilize	the	identical	flight	and	ground	station	components	

used	in	the	original	exemption.

Sincerely,

Nathan	Richards
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.16.2           Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement Renewal
                          and Extension Acknowledgment between Quaker City Bank
                          and Jerrold S. Perisho dated July 1, 2001.

                                QUAKER CITY BANK
                          CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
                      RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT



Name of Participant:              Jerrold S. Perisho
                    ----------------------------------------------------------




The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly
scheduled meeting  on June 21, 2001, the Board of Directors of Quaker City Bank
acted to renew and extend the Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement with
the undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until June
30, 2003.


Dated this ___1st___ day of ____July____, A.D., ______2001_____.



                              QUAKER CITY BANK


 /s/ Jerrold S. Perisho         By:  /s/ Frederic R. McGill
--------------------------          --------------------------
Participant                         President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          21,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,973
<INVENTORY>                                    112,448
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               263,698
<PP&E>                                         339,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                 146,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 551,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,168
<BONDS>                                        110,791
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,890
<OTHER-SE>                                     252,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   551,991
<SALES>                                        539,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               539,454
<CGS>                                          416,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  416,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,335
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,665
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.59
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5703 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5703

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Propenoic acid, polymer 
                         with diethenylbenzene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

 Mr. Paulsen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Propenoic acid, polymer 
                         with diethenylbenzene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-PROPENOIC ACID, POLYMER WITH DIETHENYLBENZENE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.95 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-Propenoic acid, polymer 
with diethenylbenzene) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 31.1

Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Peter P. Smetek, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Larrea BioSciences
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. Larrea BioSciences Corporation's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Larrea
BioSciences Corporation and, have:

a. Have caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Larrea BioSciences
is made known to us by others within this entity, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared; and,

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of Larrea BioSciences' disclosure controls and
procedures and present in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report, and the date of this report, based on such evaluation.

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

    Date: April 7, 2006                         /s/ Peter P. Smetek, Jr.
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Peter P. Smetek, Jr.
                                                Chief Executive Officer