alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1000

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                       Jul-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                               2,801
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        11,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,210
<INVENTORY>                                          11,046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     26,195
<PP&E>                                               8,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                       4,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       32,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                6,223
<BONDS>                                              15,073
<COMMON>                                             169
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           10,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         32,302
<SALES>                                              42,573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     42,573
<CGS>                                                30,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        30,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8,344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      2,745
<INCOME-TAX>                                         55
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  2,690
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      150
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,690
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.18



</TABLE>
Fw: Follow-up calls on SO2 NAAQS--need some help understanding what 

we're doing on Thursday

Michael Stewart to: Tricia Crabtree 05/03/2010 01:56 PM

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-7524

stewart.michael@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US on 05/03/2010 01:56 PM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Richard Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>, Heidi King <hking@omb.eop.gov>, James 

Hemby/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott 

Mathias/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/03/2010 01:47 PM

Subject: RE: Follow-up calls on SO2 NAAQS--need some help understanding what we're doing on Thursday

Either way is fine with me, as I plan to attend both meetings. It seems to me that it would make sense to 

have everyone on the first call, and begin discussion of the monitoring, etc. issues once we complete the 

standard discussion, which I don't believe will take too long, and then have the second hour to discuss 

whatever we don't get to in the first meeting. I think because the standard discussion should be relatively 

short in this meeting, it makes sense to have the whole team on the phone and get through as much of 

the package as we can in the first meeting, and have the second to complete the discussion if need be. 

Then, in subsequent meetings, where we anticipate a fuller discussion of NAAQS issues, we can have 

separate meetings on monitoring and modeling, as need be. Does that make sense to you?

Richard Wayland I had assumed the first was on the standard and... 05/03/2010 01:39:29 PM

From: Richard Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>, Heidi King <hking@omb.eop.gov>, James 

Hemby/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott 

Mathias/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/03/2010 01:39 PM

Subject: RE: Follow-up calls on SO2 NAAQS--need some help understanding what we're doing on Thursday

I had assumed the first was on the standard and the second on the implementation, which covers the 

monitoring/modeling. Whatever works best, but when we try and do all together, we never get time for 

the implementation side, so that's why we proposed 2 separate meetings. Plus, we would not have to 

have all the implementation folks on the first call if we're focusing just on the standard. Hoping to 

maximize folks time as well.

Chet

________________________________________

Richard A. "Chet" Wayland

Director, Air Quality Assessment Division

U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

(919) 541-4603

Lydia Wegman I need some clarification of what we're doing on... 05/03/2010 01:35:16 PM

Richard Wayland Great! We'll set it up for 2pm Thursday. ______... 05/03/2010 12:30:38 PM
"King, Heidi R." 2pm sounds pretty good! heidi 05/03/2010 12:13:41 PM
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 17-10478

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Latroy Leon Burris, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:16-CR-163-1

ON REMAND FROM

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before Wiener, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

This case is back before us because the U.S. Supreme Court granted 

Mr. Burris’s petition for certiorari, vacated our earlier decision, and 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 19, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 17-10478 Document: 00515985375 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/19/2021
No. 17-10478

2

remanded the case for further consideration in light of Borden v. United 

States, 141 S. Ct. 1817 (2021). 

Mr. Burris pleaded guilty to a two-count federal indictment charging 

him with possessing a firearm after a felony conviction and possessing a 

substance containing heroin. Because Mr. Burris had three prior Texas 

convictions that the district court considered violent felonies under the

Armed Career Criminal Act, it applied the Act’s three-strike enhancement, 

and its corresponding fifteen-year mandatory minimum, to the felon-inpossession count. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1), (2)(B). We initially affirmed.

But one of Mr. Burris’s convictions was for simple robbery under 

Texas Penal Code § 29.02(a)(1). And Burton now makes it clear that simple 

robbery is not a violent felony for purposes of applying the ACCA’s 

mandatory fifteen-year minimum enhancement because it could be 

committed simply by recklessly causing another to suffer injury during a 

theft. 141 S. Ct. at 1825; United States v. Ybarra, No. 20-10520, 2021 WL 

3276471, at *1 (5th Cir. July 30, 2021).

Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s unopposed motion to vacate the 

decision of the district court, VACATE the decision, and REMAND for 

resentencing. All other motions are DENIED as moot. 

Case: 17-10478 Document: 00515985375 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/19/2021
#### Alexander Friedman, Respondent, *v.*United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 19, 1957.

*307
      *John J. O’Connor*and *James M. Gilleran*for appellant.

*Louis Solomon*and *Arthur C. Parker*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The action here is predicated on the statutory right conferred upon plaintiff by the provisions of section 167 of the Insurance Law. It does not flow to plaintiff from the rights which accrued to the policyholder and plaintiff is not a person deriving his title through or under deceased by assignment or otherwise. Consequently, section 347 of the Civil Practice Act is not a bar to the receipt in evidence of the testimony adduced during the trial of the City Court action, nor does it prohibit the admission of the statement signed by deceased.

In its attempt to prove non-co-operation defendant was also entitled to adduce the testimony of its witness Dubrowski to show if it could that Berkowitz acknowledged the truth of the written statement but testified otherwise at the trial. Plaintiff’s inability to contradict Dubrowski because of Berkowitz’ death, unfortunate as it may be for plaintiff, does not render Dubrowski’s testimony inadmissible.

It was error, therefore, for the court below to exclude the items indicated, and the judgment should be reversed so that defendant may have the opportunity of developing its defense at a new trial.

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant.

Hofstadter, Steubr and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                                1000

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   360
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         15,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                           1,791
<INVENTORY>                                           14,975
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      31,177
<PP&E>                                                 8,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                         5,033
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        36,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 19,726
<BONDS>                                                4,460
<COMMON>                                                 169
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                            12,393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          36,748
<SALES>                                               18,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      18,594
<CGS>                                                 12,738
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         12,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       4,126
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        1,296
<INCOME-TAX>                                              26
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    1,270
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           1,270
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.08


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q DATED
SEPTEMBER 27, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<CIK> 0000094673
<NAME> STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-27-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-27-1996
<CASH>                                       282,907
<SECURITIES>                                  87,017
<RECEIVABLES>                                436,587  <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  263,174
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,070,733
<PP&E>                                       328,965  <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,801,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        511,154
<BONDS>                                      172,605
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      11,366
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,090,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,801,123
<SALES>                                    1,006,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,418,871
<CGS>                                        607,568
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                826,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             135,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            21,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              140,349
<INCOME-TAX>                                  37,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          102,949
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                9,535
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 112,484
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.95

<FN>
  <F1> Asset values for the interim period
       represent net amounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58764-58765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25121]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-559-000]


Reliant Energy Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

September 26, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 22, 2000, Reliant Energy Gas 
Transmission Company (REGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be 
effective November 1, 2000:

First Revised Sheet No. 71
First Revised Sheet No. 72
First Revised Sheet No. 74
First Revised Sheet No. 75
First Revised Sheet No. 76
Original Sheet No. 77
Original Sheet No. 78
Second Revised Sheet No. 311
First Revised Sheet No. 317

    REGT states that the purpose of this filing is to implement an in-
kind option for Shippers electing service under REGT's Rate Schedule 
ANS.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public

[[Page 58765]]

inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on 
the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-25121 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 12 

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 81-14 Filed 05/19/23 Page 1 of 5



Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 81-14 Filed 05/19/23 Page 5 of 5
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                           MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
                               CREDIT CORPORATION

                              Michael J. Gillespie
                              Accounting Director

                              Officer's Certificate

Pursuant to the Servicing Agreement between Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Credit
Corporation, formerly known as NOVUS Financial Corporation, as seller and
servicer (referred to herein in such capacity as the "Servicer"), and Sequoia
Mortgage Trust 6,7, 8, 9,11,12; 2003-1, 2, 3,4,5,6,7, 8; 2004-1,2,3,4,5,6,7, 8,
9,10,11,12, the undersigned, hereby states that:

      (1) A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance
under the Servicing Agreement during the calendar year ended December 31, 2004
has been made under my supervision; and

      (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

                                            MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
                                            CREDIT CORPORATION

                                            By: /s/ Douglas J. Bush
                                                -------------------
                                                     Douglas  J. Bush
                                            Title Director

                                            Dated as of December 31, 2004

                                            By: /s/ David Bianucci
                                                -------------------------
                                                    David Bianucci
                                            Title Vice President

                                            Dated as of December 31, 2004

    2500 Lake Cook Road. J East, Riverwoods, Illinois 60015 Tel (224) 405-1903
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995<F2>
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                       0
<CASH>                                       6,970,412
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,176,516
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,089,770<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,176,516
<PREMIUMS>                                     171,103
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         24,909,308<F1>
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           (408,498)
<OTHER-INCOME>                               2,780,160<F1>
<BENEFITS>                                  19,352,997
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  2,971,790
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (255,578)<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (139,834)<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (115,744)<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (115,744)<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.39)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0

<FN>
<F1>January 01, 1995 through May 31, 1995.
<F2>The Company is currently using Liquidation Accounting.
<F3>Net assets in liquidation.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             38
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     433
<ALLOWANCES>                                       42
<INVENTORY>                                       546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,108
<PP&E>                                          4,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                    357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  8,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             779
<BONDS>                                         3,883
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                        78
<COMMON>                                        2,545
<OTHER-SE>                                        344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    8,984
<SALES>                                         4,039
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,039
<CGS>                                           3,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   177
<INCOME-TAX>                                       95
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                82
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     1
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                       83
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .00



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5277 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5277

        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on D-Mannose.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Pascrell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on D-Mannose.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. D-MANNOSE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.19 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to D-Mannose) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```