alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Harold F. Zagunis, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Sequoia
Residential Funding, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of the
Certificates for periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
reports;

      4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the
terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed in the
reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement; and

      5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement, that is included
in these reports.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter Credit Corporation, as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.,
as Servicer, Cendant Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, Bank of America, N.A.,
as Servicer, and GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer.

Date: March 31, 2005

/s/ Harold F. Zagunis
--------------------------------------
Signature
Name: Harold F. Zagunis
Title: Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Filed 8/3/05 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2005 ND 148

In the Matter of the Application for Disciplinary Action Against 

John T. Korsmo, a Member of the Bar of the State of North Dakota

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court, Petitioner

v.

John T. Korsmo, Respondent

No. 20050251

INTERIM SUSPENSION ORDERED.

Per Curiam.

[¶1]On July 27, 2005, an Application for the Interim Suspension of John T. Korsmo, a member of the Bar of North Dakota, and a certified copy of the Judgment in a Criminal Case in United State of America v. John T. Korsmo, United States District Court, District of Columbia, Case No. CR05-104-01, was filed under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.1(D) by Paul W. Jacobson, Disciplinary Counsel.  The Judgment in a Criminal Case shows that Korsmo was found guilty of one count of false and fictitious statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2), a felony.

[¶2]N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.1(D) provides that upon the filing with the court of a certificate or other satisfactory evidence of conviction demonstrating that a lawyer has been convicted of a serious crime, the court shall enter an order immediately suspending the lawyer pending final disposition of a disciplinary proceeding predicated upon the conviction.

[¶3]Under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.1(C), a serious crime is any felony and any lesser crime a necessary element of which, as determined by the statutory or common law definition of the crime, involves interference with the administration of justice, false swearing, misrepresentation, fraud, willful failure to file income tax returns, deceit, bribery, extortion, misappropriation, theft, or an attempt or a conspiracy or solicitation of another to commit any of those crimes.

[¶4]ORDERED, under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.1(D), John T. Korsmo’s certificate of admission to the Bar of the State of North Dakota is SUSPENDED effective immediately and until further order of this Court, pending final disposition of a disciplinary proceeding predicated upon the conviction.

[¶5]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

[¶6]The Honorable Dale V. Sandstrom and the Honorable Daniel J. Crothers, deeming themselves disqualified, did not participate in this decision.
EXHIBIT 32.2



                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sports Arenas,  Inc. and
susidiairies (the "Company") for the six months ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
Steven R. Whitman, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,  hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




     /s/ STEVEN R. WHITMAN
     -----------------------
         Steven R. Whitman
         Chief Financial Officer

         February 17, 2004
         ----------------
This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 1

Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 1 of 3
6/4/2020 Texas

https://www.cypress.com/country/texas 1/2

Home › USA

Cypress Semiconductor – Texas (Excluding El Paso)

Contact: Americas-Sales-South-Central@cypress.com

Read more

Cypress Semiconductor – Austin

5204 East Ben White Boulevard

Austin, TX 78741

Read more

O'Donnell Associates Southwest - Texas (El Paso only)

300 Thunderbird Drive

Suite 18

El Paso, TX 79912

Phone: 915-778-2581

Fax: 915-778-6429

www.odonnellsw.com

Contact: cypress@odonnellsw.com

Read more

SOLUTIONS

Automotive

Industrial

Consumer

PRODUCTS

Wireless

Microcontrollers (MCUs)

Memory

Universal Serial Bus (USB)

Power Management

Touch Sensing

Clocks & Buers

DESIGN SUPPORT

Community

Videos

Quality & Reliability

Product Roadmaps

ABOUT US

Investors

Careers

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

Cypress Semiconductor Corp.

198 Champion Court

San Jose, CA 95134 USA

Tel: +1-408-943-2600

Enter Your Keywords  Community  English

Cart

 Log in

SOLUTIONS PRODUCTS DESIGN SUPPORT BUY & SAMPLE

ABOUT CYPRESS



F

e

e

d

b

a

c

k

Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 2 of 3
6/4/2020 Texas

https://www.cypress.com/country/texas 2/2

CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPPORT

+1-800-541-4736

Hours:

8:00AM - 5:00PM (local time)

Create a MyCase

Cypress Developer Community

INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT

+1-408-943-2600

United States +1-800-541-4736

Hours:

4:30AM - 1:30PM (pacic time)

7:30PM - 4:30AM (standard time)

OTHER REQUESTS

Contact Us

Report a Website Problem

Report a Security Vulnerability

ABOUT US CAREERS INVESTORS LEGAL

© Cypress Semiconductor Corporation. All rights reserved.



F

e

e

d

b

a

c

k

Case 6:20-cv-00523-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 3 of 3
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5549 

To suspend temporarily the duty on recombinant staphylococcal protein A 

(56kDa). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. BENISHEK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on recombinant 

staphylococcal protein A (56kDa). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RECOMBINANT STAPHYLOCOCCAL PROTEIN A 

4 (56KDA). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Recombinant staphylococcal protein A (56kDa) 

(provided for in subheading 3913.90.02) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5549 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Ben Estates Corporation, Appellant, *v.*Salvatore Giampiccolo, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 24, 1957.

*Emanuel Brachfeld*for appellant.

*Anthony Valenti*and *Paul Morton*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

A summary proceeding based upon a certificate of eviction presupposes the landlord’s right thereto as having been established to the satisfaction of the Rent Administrator *(83 Ridge St. Corp.*v. *Schnitzer,*199 Misc. 826). The court below should not have permitted a review of the evidence upon which the landlord had based its application for the certificate of eviction.

The record does not indicate that the landlord did not in fact desire tenant’s space for occupancy by a resident superin*192tendent and the verdict of the jury was contrary to the weight of the admissible evidence and should not be permitted to stand.

Tenant’s remedy is by way of application to the Bent Administrator for reconsideration based upon the alleged new facts.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in petition, with costs.

Hecht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur .

Final order reversed, etc.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

MEMORANDUM

DATE: September 18, 2015

TO: EPA Region 9 Rulemaking File for the BAAQMD NSR SIP Submittal

FROM: Ann Lyons, EPA Region 9, Office of Regional Counsel

SUBJECT: September 18, 2015 Phone Call regarding EPA Proposed Limited Approval and 

Limited Disapproval of Regulation 2, Rules 1 & 2

ATTENDEES

• Ann Lyons, Region 9, Office of Regional Counsel

• Sandy Crockett, BAAQMD Counsel’s Office

SUMMARY

I recommended BAAQMD could look at Placer County Rule 305.2 or Sacramento Rule 214 for 

examples of rules to implement 40 CFR 51.160. I also recommended reviewing Sacramento 

Rule 214 as an example of a rule to implement 40 CFR 51.307.

ATTACHMENTS

• None
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTEE OF TREASURE ISLAND ROYALTY TRUST
             PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Treasure Island Royalty Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the
Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust.

                                       WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
                                       Trustee for Treasure Island Royalty Trust


Date: March 30, 2004                   By:        /s/ Kevin M. Dobrava
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Kevin M. Dobrava
                                           Vice President


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Treasure Island Royalty Trust and will be retained by the
Treasure Island Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50877

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Juan Reynaldo Rodriguez-Morales, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:20-CR-1232-1

Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Juan Reynaldo Rodriguez-Morales appeals his conviction and 

sentence for illegal reentry after deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 

(b)(1). He argues that his sentence exceeded the statutory maximum because 

the enhanced penalty provisions of § 1326(b) are unconstitutional.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 28, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50877 Document: 00516255785 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2022
No. 21-50877

2

Rodriguez-Morales has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

disposition and a letter brief conceding correctly that this issue is foreclosed 

by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States 

v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553–54 (5th Cir. 2019). He states that he has raised 

the issue only to preserve it for possible further review. Because summary 

disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 

1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Rodriguez-Morales’s motion is GRANTED, and the 

district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-50877 Document: 00516255785 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2022
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5591 

To modify and extend the temporary reduction of duty on β-cyfluthrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To modify and extend the temporary reduction of duty on 

β-cyfluthrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. β-CYFLUTHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.64 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 β-cyfluthrin) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘4.8%’’ and inserting ‘‘2.1%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5591 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

 v.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.; 

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO.6:20-cv-00534-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF THE FILING OF A 

PETITION FOR INTER-PARTES REVIEW 

Pursuant to the Court’s Order Governing Proceeding – Patent Case (“Order Governing 

Proceeding”), namely General Issue No. 6, Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos 

Licensing and Development (“WSOU”) hereby provides notice that defendant Huawei 

Technology Co, Ltd. filed a petition requesting inter-partes review of the patent in-suit, U.S. Patent 

No. 7,095,713, on November 30, 2020. See IPR2021-00223. Based on the file accord date of 

December 9, 2020, the expected time for an institution decision is June 9, 2021. If instituted, the 

expected time for a final written decision is June 9, 2022.

Dated: December 14, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Ryan S. Loveless

James L. Etheridge

Texas Bar No. 24059147

Ryan S. Loveless

Texas Bar No. 24036997

Brett A. Mangrum

Texas Bar No. 24065671

Travis L. Richins

Texas Bar No. 24061296

Jeff Huang

Etheridge Law Group, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Case 6:20-cv-00534-ADA Document 36 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Southlake, TX 76092

Tel.: (817) 470-7249

Fax: (817) 887-5950

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com

Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com

Jeff@EtheridgeLaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR WSOU

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record, who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this December 14, 2020, with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

ECF system.

/s/ Ryan S. Loveless

Ryan S. Loveless

Case 6:20-cv-00534-ADA Document 36 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7682

CLINTON R. BEDELL, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VT. D.O.C.; JOHN GORCZYK; J. LABRIOLA; DR.

CURRY-EL, Psychologist; DR. GENERAL; DR.

FIELDING; B. BLAKELY; E. WILLIAMS; F. ROACH;

C. MITCHELL; C. DAVIS; M. MILLARD; M. BOONE;

K. DAVIS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

RON ANGELONE, F.T.C.A. Official Capacity;

INTERSTATE COMPACT CONTRACT; GREENSVILLE; VA.

D.O.C.; K. CLARK; TERRY MOSHER, (VtDoc);

SHAUNA LEWIS; DR. LEWIS; R. SPENCE; G.

GARRAGHTY, 

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (CA-01-780-2)

Submitted: December 19, 2003 Decided: February 11, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
- 2 -

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clinton R. Bedell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Philip Carlton

Hollowell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,

Virginia; John David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond,

Virginia; Michael Eugene Ornoff, ORNOFF & ARNOLD, P.C., Virginia

Beach, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Clinton R. Bedell, Jr., appeals the district court’s

judgment dismissing his complaint against various defendants,

including prison authorities in Virginia and Vermont. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and orders

disposing of Bedell’s claims and find no error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bedell v.

Vermont Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-01-780-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2003).

We deny Bedell’s motion for leave to file a supplemental brief and

we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-60604

Summary Calendar

Awdrey Jamileth Martinez-Hernandez, 

Petitioner,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A208 778 063

Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Awdrey Jamileth Martinez-Hernandez, a native and citizen of 

Honduras, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (“BIA”). The BIA dismissed her appeal from a decision of the 

Immigration Judge (“IJ”) concluding that she was ineligible for asylum, 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 2, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-60604 Document: 00516340913 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/02/2022
No. 21-60604

2

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture 

(“CAT”). She challenges the BIA’s conclusions that she has not shown 

eligibility for asylum and withholding of removal because she failed to provide 

reasonably available corroborating evidence, show past persecution or a wellfounded fear of future persecution, establish membership in a particular 

social group, show that the Government is unable or unwilling to protect her, 

and show that she could not reasonably relocate within Honduras. She also 

challenges the BIA’s conclusion that she had not shown eligibility for CAT 

relief. These arguments are reviewed under the substantial evidence 

standard. See Zhang v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005). 

Additionally, we review the decision of the BIA and consider the IJ’s decision 

only insofar as it influenced the BIA. See Singh v. Sessions, 880 F.3d 220, 224 

(5th Cir. 2018).

Martinez-Hernandez has not shown that substantial evidence 

compels a conclusion contrary to that of the BIA on the issue whether she 

showed past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution or 

showed that future persecution is more likely than not. See INS v. 

Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992); Zhang, 432 F.3d at 344. 

Accordingly, we need not consider her remaining arguments related to the 

BIA’s ruling as to her asylum and withholding claims. See INS v. 

Bagamasbad, 429 U.S. 24, 25 (1976) (per curiam); see also Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 

F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 2002). Finally, we are not compelled to find that 

Martinez-Hernandez will more likely than not be tortured if repatriated 

because the record primarily reflects general conditions of danger and the 

specific harm described does not qualify as persecution and thus cannot 

qualify as torture. See Qorane v. Barr, 919 F.3d 904, 911 (5th Cir. 2019). 

The petition for review is DENIED.

Case: 21-60604 Document: 00516340913 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/02/2022
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350**
     I, David H. Fleischman, Chief Financial Officer of TradeStation Group,Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:
     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation Group, Inc. for thequarter ended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of TradeStation Group, Inc.
     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separatedisclosure document.        November 8, 2004 /s/ David H. Fleischman  Date David H. Fleischman   Chief Financial Officer,