alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Movie Star, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Dated: May 13, 2004                           /s/ Melvyn Knigin
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Melvyn Knigin
                                              Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 13, 2004                           /s/ Thomas Rende
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Thomas Rende
                                              Chief Financial Officer (Principal
                                              Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO DIVISION

Sandra Julissa Santos Mejia, Izabetty Isaac

Donatien, Abigail Argueta Gutierrez, Maribel

Lopez Velazquez, Mariela Mesa Laverde,

Rosa Estela Temu Gonzalez

vs.

Jose A. Renteria, Corey Price, Matthew T.

Albence, Chad Wolf

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

EP:20-CV-00108-FM

ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING in District Courtroom, Room 422, on the 4th

Floor of the United States Courthouse, 525 Magoffin Avenue, El Paso, TX, on Tuesday, 

April 28, 2020 at 02:30 PM. All parties and counsel must appear at this hearing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of April, 2020.

______________________________

FRANK MONTALVO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-00108-FM Document 2 Filed 04/27/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32(2)


         CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of 7-Eleven,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June
30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward W. Moneypenny,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



                        /s/ Edward W. Moneypenny
                        ------------------------------------
                        Edward W. Moneypenny
                        Senior Vice President and Chief
                           Financial Officer
                        7-Eleven, Inc.






















                                       Tab 5
#### LITTERAL et al. v. SPURLOCK.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 5, 1952.

Grannis Bach, Steve C. Bach, Jackson, for appellants.

O. J. Cockrell, Jackson, for appellee.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

Mr. and Mrs. J. M. Litteral are appealing from a judgment holding that Edgar Spur-lock had not violated a coal mine lease which they executed to him. The Litterals contend on this appeal that the judgment should be reversed because (1) Spurlock had not installed scales at the mine as provided in the lease; (2) he had not paid all the royalties; and (3) he had unnecessarily gobbed the mine.

The Litterals own a truck mine on Highway 15, a few miles out of Jackson. They leased the mine to Spurlock in 1948. He was to pay 25 cents per ton for all coal taken from the mine. The lease provided that the coal should be weighed on scales placed at the mine by Spurlock. The royalties were to be paid on the 10th day of each month for the coal mined during the previous 30 days. Some of the coal was sold at the mine and the remainder was hauled to Jackson, where it was loaded in freight cars along with other coal which Spurlock had purchased. It was not until after this suit was instituted in October, 1950, that Spurlock installed scales at the mine.

Some of the proof was heard before the chancellor and some was taken by deposition. There is- conflicting proof as to the cause of the delay in the installation of the scales. The appellants said they made repeated attempts to get Spurlock to install them. On the other hand, he said it was difficult to obtain scales at that time; that he purchased a set in Jackson; and that they were not installed because the seller had lost the diagram for their installation. There is proof also that the Litterals agreed for Spurlock to go ahead and operate the mine until he could get a satisfactory set of scales at a reasonable price.

Even though no scales were installed, the Litterals knew firsthand that the mine was in operation and they accepted the royalties paid them. The royalties on coal shipped by rail were estimated from the railway weight sheets. Those on the coal sold at the mine were calculated on the basis of the number of truckloads. The Litterals contend that Spurlock failed to account to them for all the royalties due, but our examination of the record convinces us there was ample evidence to support the finding of the chancellor that all royalties were accounted for.

Spurlock was removing the pillars from the mine. Apparently, there had been some gob left in the mine before he began his operations and he left additional gob. The testimony of the Litterals, including that of an engineer, was to the effect that Spurlock had gobbed the mine so as to make it unfit for further mining operations. The engineer said it was virtually impossible for him to survey the mine and calculate the damage done. On the other hand, a senior State mine inspector said the mine was operated “a little -better than average,” and that the gobbing did not interfere with its operation, in his judgment. There was other proof to the same effect.

We think the chancellor made a proper disposition of the whole case.

Judgment affirmed.
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. S-6/A


Exhibit 4.3



 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated September 14, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 534 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-257109) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


September 14, 2021
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

For the following periods the registrant had no securities that were dilutive
for the calculation of earnings per share.

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                              Weighted average number of basic
      Summary from unaudited financial        Basic and diluted loss per       and diluted common stock shares
                 statements                          common share                        outstanding
      --------------------------------        --------------------------      --------------------------------
<S>                                           <C>                             <C>

   Nine months ended 2/28/02                             (0.14)                           13,667,381
   Three months ended 2/28/02                            (0.05)                           14,748,302
   Nine months ended 2/28/01                             (0.11)                           12,604,090
   Three months ended 2/28/01                            (0.04)                           12,967,287
</Table>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25318]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, October 5, 2000.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: September 28, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-25318 Filed 9-28-00; 10:36 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSEPH ALLEN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 432 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of February, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### ACOSTA v. STATE.

No. 26387.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 22, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for sale of beer in Lubbock County, a dry area; the punishment 60 days in jail and a fine of $300.

It was admitted that Lubbock County was dry and that appellant had been previously convicted of the offense of similar nature charged for the purpose of enhancing the punishment.

The state proved by its witnesses that appellant sold beer to the person named in the complaint and information, in Lubbock County, as alleged.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### David Lee HINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27180.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 17, 1954.

*515No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; the penalty assessed is á fine of $100 and confinement in the county jail for ten days.

All matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is présented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Stephen Grist, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Viatel Holding (Bermuda)
Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
         by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
         covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control
         over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):


<PAGE>


         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
         process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
         control over financial reporting.





Date: 29 March 2004


/S/ Stephen Grist
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATIONS 

I, Richard Fisher, certify that: 

1.  I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Cytation Corporation; 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: 

     (a)  Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; 

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

     (c)  Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

     (a)  All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 18, 2004

 

/s/ Richard Fisher
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 3149

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JOSE LUIS FLORES

- MEJIA, a/k/a JOSE FLORES MEJIA,

a/k/a JOSE LUIS MEJIA, a/k/a/ MANUEL MENDEZ

Appellant

( Crim. No. 2

- 11

- 00712

- 01 )

PRESENT: McK

EE, Chief Judge

, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER,

CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, Jr., VANASKIE,

SHWARTZ , SLOVITER* and ROTH *

, Circuit Judges

ORDER

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en ban c in the a bove

captioned case, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED.

The Clerk of this Court shall list the case for rehearing en banc at the convenience

of the Court. The opinion and judgment entered July 19, 2013 are hereby vacated.

By the Court,

/s/ Theodore A. McKee

Chief Circuit Judge

Date: September 18, 2013

cc: Jeffery W. Whitt, Esq.

Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq.

Robert Epstein, Esq.

________________________

* will participate as a member of the en banc court pursuant to 3d. Cir. I.O.P. 9.6.4.
Exhibit 99.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

      I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, Motorola Debenture-Backed Series 2002-12 Trust (the "Trust"),
certify that:

    1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
        Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing
        reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in respect of
        periods included in the year covered by this annual report of the
        Trust;

    2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
        whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
        omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
        in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
        not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
        report;

    3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
        provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
        under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in
        such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

    4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee
        under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my
        knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has
        fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.



Date: March 28, 2005


         /s/ David J. Kolibachuk
--------------------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 7, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00738

- CR

Aidan VITELA, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court

, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6023

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State’s brief was originally due on October 5, 2020. On the due date, the State filed an unopposed motion for a ninety

- day extension of time to file its brief until January 4, 2021.

The State’s motion is GRANTED. The State’s brief is due on January 4, 2021. Any further request for an extension of time to file the State’s brief may be disfavored.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have he reunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of October, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5445 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Captan technical. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. MEEHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Captan technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPTAN TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 3a, 4, 7, 7, a-tetrahydro-2- 

[(trichloromethyl)thio]-1Hisoindole-1,3(2H)-dione 

(Captan technical) (CAS 

No. 133–06–2) (provided 

for in subheading 

2930.90.43) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5445 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 198 (Thursday, October 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Air University Board of Visitors Meeting

    The Air University Board of Visitors will hold an open meeting on 
November 12-15, 2000, with the first business session beginning at 8 
a.m. in the Air University Conference Room at Headquarters Air 
University, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama (five seats are available).
    The purpose of the meeting is to give the board an opportunity to 
review Air University educational programs and to present to the 
Commander, a report of their findings and recommendations concerning 
these programs.
    For further information on this meeting, contact Dr. Dorothy Reed, 
Chief of Academic Affairs, Air University Headquarters, Maxwell Air 
Force Base, Alabama 36112-6335, telephone (334) 953-5159.

Janet A. Long,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-26099 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P