alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 20
- 00061
- CR

Melvin Auston, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 390TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- DC
- 11
- 300068, THE HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant Melvin Auston, proceeding pro se, has filed a notice of appeal from the district court ’ s order denying his motion for DNA testing. On September 17 , 2020, Auston filed

a two

- page appellant ’ s brief , along with a letter in w hich he indicated that prior to filing his brief , he had been un able to review the appellate record

. O n this Court ’ s own motion, we extended the brie fing deadline to provide Auston additional time to obtain the record and file an amended brief prepared wi th reference to the record

. We instructed Auston to request a copy of the record from the Travis County clerk ’ s office and provided him with conta ct information for that office

. We extended the briefing deadline to November 16, 2020 and informed Auston t hat i f an amended brief or a motion for extension of time to file an amended brief wa s not filed by that date, hi s case may be considered on the in itial brief and the appellate record alone

.2 Prior to the deadline, Auston filed a motion for extension of tim e to file hi s amended brief , a s serting that he had not yet received a copy of the record

. W e grant Auston ’ s motion and order Au ston to file his amended br ief no later than January 15, 2021

. Once again, we instruct Auston to request a copy of the record f rom the Travis County clerk ’ s office. N o further extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order will result in
Auston ’ s appeal being decided on his initial brief , any b rief filed by the State, and the appellate record

. It is ordered on December 11, 2020

.

Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Smith Do Not Publish
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC,

 Plaintiff 

-vHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., 

LTD., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES 

USA INC. 

 Defendants 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

W-20-CV-00534 

W-20-CV-00536 

W-20-CV-00538 

W-20-CV-00542 

ORDER TO PAY TECHNICAL ADVISOR 

The Court previously appointed Dr. Joshua J. Yi to serve as a technical advisor on this 

case. The Court has reviewed Dr. Yi’s invoice for services through today and finds the requested 

amount to be reasonable and necessary. As such, the Court ORDERS payment to be promptly 

made as follows: 

Plaintiff: $8,113.33 

Defendant: $8,113.33 

Dr. Yi will separately provide deposit instructions. 

SIGNED this 2nd day of June, 2021. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00536-ADA Document 68 Filed 06/02/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.1    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   Board of Directors The Standard Register Company Dayton, Ohio  We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of March 29, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the thirteen week periods ended March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.  Based upon our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of December 28, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 6, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 28, 2008 is fairly stated, in all material respects.   /S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP   Dayton, Ohio April 29, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6274

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEROME FIELDS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-84-115-A, CA-96-1667-AM)

Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 19, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Patrice Tandy, Assistant

United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Fields, Nos. CR-84-115-A; CA-96-1667-AM

(E.D. Va. Nov. 19, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification under Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Thomas F. Bradley, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Enesco Group, Inc.(the “Registrant”). 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the Registrant andwe have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect , the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of the internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s Board of Directors:
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting. /s/ Thomas F. Bradley Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
30
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                                                                    PO Box 84013
                                                          Columbus GA 31908-4013
                                                               Tel. 800.784.5566

                                                    [GREENPOINT G MORTGAGE LOGO]

TO : RWT HOLDINGS, INC.

      Re: Annual Statement as to Compliance by the Seller

      Pursuant to Section 6.04 of the Mortgage Loan Flow Purchase, Sale, and
Servicing Agreement between GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. as Seller (the
"Seller") and RWT Holdings, Inc. as Purchaser, dated as of August 1, 2002 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned officer of the Seller, hereby certifies as to the
following:

            (i) a review of the activities of the Seller during the calendar
      year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Applicable Period") and of the Seller's
      performance under the Agreement has been made under the direct supervision
      of the undersigned officer; and

            (ii) to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such
      review, the Seller has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      Agreement throughout the Applicable Period, and there has been no known
      default in the fulfillment of the Seller's obligations throughout such
      Applicable Period.

                                        Very Truly Yours

                                        GREENPOINT MORTGAGE
                                        FUNDING, INC.
                                        as Seller

                                        /s/ Roy Briggs
                                        -------------------------
                                        Name: Roy Briggs
                                        Title: Vice President

                AVISO IMPORTANCE ARA LAS PERSONAS HABLA ESPENOL

     Si usted no entiendo el contenido do esta carts por favor obtonga una
                            trnduckion immediamente

                 2300 BROOKSTONC CENTRE PKWY COLUMBUS GA 31904
       CUSTOMER SERVICE HOURS: MONDAY - FRIDAY, 8:30 AM - 8:00 PM, EASTERN
                           WWW.GREENPOINTSERVICE.COM
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

 v.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.; 

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO.6:20-cv-00541-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF THE FILING OF A 

PETITION FOR INTER-PARTES REVIEW 

Pursuant to the Court’s Order Governing Proceeding – Patent Case (“Order Governing 

Proceeding”), namely General Issue No. 6, Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos 

Licensing and Development (“WSOU”) hereby provides notice that defendant Huawei 

Technology Co, Ltd. filed a petition requesting inter-partes review of the patent in-suit, U.S. Patent 

No. 9,084,199, on November 30, 2020. See IPR2021-00227. The USPTO has not yet accorded a 

filing date, but one is expected soon. Based on a file accord date of December 15, 2020, the 

expected time for an institution decision is June 15, 2021. If instituted, the expected time for a 

final written decision is June 15, 2022.

Dated: December 14, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Ryan S. Loveless

James L. Etheridge

Texas Bar No. 24059147

Ryan S. Loveless

Texas Bar No. 24036997

Brett A. Mangrum

Texas Bar No. 24065671

Travis L. Richins

Texas Bar No. 24061296

Jeff Huang

Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 36 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Etheridge Law Group, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, TX 76092

Tel.: (817) 470-7249

Fax: (817) 887-5950

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com

Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com

Jeff@EtheridgeLaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR WSOU

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record, who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this December 14, 2020, with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

ECF system.

/s/ Ryan S. Loveless

Ryan S. Loveless

Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 36 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT T 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00505-ADA Document 27-20 Filed 11/05/20 Page 1 of 2
Cases Filters HIDE

Judges

Case Status

EDIT FILTERS

Related Filters

Judges

Courts

Patents

Patent Types

Determinations

Remedies

Case Filing Date

Case Termination Date

Case Outcome

Document Filing Date

Alan D. Albright

Active

Open filter drawer by default

PRINT Cases 544 Results

WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. TP-Link Technology Co., Ltd.

6-20-cv-01012 (WDTX)

Oct. 31, 2020

WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. TP-Link Technology Co., Ltd.

6-20-cv-01013 (WDTX)

Oct. 31, 2020

WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. TP-Link Technology Co., Ltd.

6-20-cv-01014 (WDTX)

Oct. 31, 2020

WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. TP-Link Technology Co., Ltd.

6-20-cv-01015 (WDTX)

Oct. 31, 2020

WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. TP-Link Technology Co., Ltd.

6-20-cv-01016 (WDTX)

Oct. 31, 2020

WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. TP-Link Technology Co., Ltd.

6-20-cv-01017 (WDTX)

Oct. 31, 2020

WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. TP-Link Technology Co., Ltd.

6-20-cv-01018 (WDTX)

Oct. 31, 2020

WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. TP-Link Technology Co., Ltd.

6-20-cv-01019 (WDTX)

Oct. 31, 2020

WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. TP-Link Technology Co., Ltd.

6-20-cv-01020 (WDTX)

Oct. 31, 2020

WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. TP-Link Technology Co., Ltd.

6-20-cv-01021 (WDTX)

Oct. 31, 2020

WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. TP-Link Technology Co., Ltd.

6-20-cv-01022 (WDTX)

Oct. 31, 2020

Fairway IP LLC v. Delta Electronics, Inc. et al

6-20-cv-01023 (WDTX)

Oct. 31, 2020

Fairway IP LLC v. Ultra Electronics Advanced Tactical Systems, Inc. et al

6-20-cv-01024 (WDTX)

Oct. 31, 2020

Gladiator IP LLC v. Ricoh USA, Inc.

6-20-cv-01008 (WDTX)

Oct. 30, 2020

ParkerVision, Inc. v. Buffalo Inc.

6-20-cv-01009 (WDTX)

Oct. 30, 2020

ParkerVision, Inc. v. ZyXEL Communications Corporation

6-20-cv-01010 (WDTX)

Oct. 30, 2020

Murolet, LLC v. Schindler Group, AG

6-20-cv-01011 (WDTX)

Oct. 30, 2020

FILTERS OPTIONS VIEW

Case Case Filing Date

Binder Information

Add New Tab

Table of Contents

Summary

Time to Milestones

Cases

Cases by Year

Timeline

Orders

Motion Pendency

Determinations

Claim Constructions

Remedies

Motion Success for Preliminary

Injunction

Motion Success for Stay Pending

IPR

Motion Success for Early

Challenges

Motion Success for Personal

Jurisdiction

Motion Success for MSJ by

Patentee

Motion Success for MSJ by

Challenger

© 2008 - 2020 Hopkins Bruce Publishers Terms of Use Report an Issue LOAD ALL

FILE Judge Alan D. Albright Case 6:20-cv-00505-ADA Document 27-20 Filed 11/05/20 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

March 29, 2004


        Management Report on Internal Control over the administration of
       the Chase Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2002-3 (the "Owner Trust")

Management of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the "Bank") is responsible for
establishing and maintaining effective internal control over its Administration
of the Certificates held by the Owner Trust and the Notes issued by the Owner
Trust ("Administration" of the Owner Trust), which is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the proper Administration of the Owner Trust. The
Bank's internal control system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions
are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in any internal control, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls.
Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to Administration of the Owner Trust. Further, because of
changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

Management of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. assessed its internal control over
its Administration of the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003 in relation to the
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management
believes that Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained effective internal
control over the Administration of the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003,
based on the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ Keith Schuck
-------------------------
Keith Schuck
Senior Vice President/CFO
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.

/s/ Patricia Garvey
-------------------------
Patricia Garvey
Senior Vice President
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC 

 

v. Case No.: 6:20-cv-00479-ADA 

 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ET AL 

ORDER 

BE IT REMEMBERED on this day, there was presented to the Court the Motion for Admission 

Pro Hac Vice filed by Jayita Guhaniyogi (“Applicant”), counsel for , and the Court, having reviewed 

the motion, enters the following order: 

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED, and Applicant 

may appear on behalf of in the above case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately 

tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local 

Court Rule AT-1(f)(2). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the corresponding Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice was 

e-filed, the attorney who filed the Motion on behalf of the Applicant is directed to notify the Applicant 

of this order. 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Applicant, pursuant to the Administrative Policies and 

Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal cases in the Western District of Texas, shall 

register as a filing user within 10 days of the date of this Order, if he/she has not previously done so on 

a prior case in this District. 

SIGNED this the 28th day of December, 2021. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00479-ADA Document 153 Filed 12/28/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB (the  "Report")  of
Downside Up, Inc.  (the  "registrant")  for the year ended April 30,  2003,  the
undersigned  James  B.  Wiegand,  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  and the  Chief
Financial  Officer of the  registrant,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.

         Date:  July __, 2003               By:   /s/ James B. Wiegand
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  James B. Wiegand,
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer



                                    * * * * *


     A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.