alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT


OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF


INTERNET SCIENCES, INC.


 


The undersigned, being the sole director (the
"Board of Directors") of Internet Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby adopts, pursuant
to the By-Laws of the Corporation and the applicable laws of the State of Delaware, the following resolutions on behalf of the Corporation:


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors
deems it in the best interest of the Corporation to appoint Matthew Liotine to serve as the Chief Technology Officer and Senior Managing
Director of the Corporation.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
that Matthew Liotine is hereby appointed as Chief Technology Officer and Senior Managing Director of the Corporation, effective September
13, 2021; and


 


BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that
the officers of the Corporation are, and each acting alone is, hereby authorized to do and perform any and all such acts, including execution
of any and all documents and certificates, as said officers shall deem necessary or advisable, to carry out the purposes of the foregoing
resolutions; and


 


BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that
any actions taken by such officers prior to the date of the foregoing resolutions adopted hereby that are within the authority conferred
thereby are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved as the acts and deeds of the Corporation.


 


This Action by Written Consent shall be filed
in the Minute Book of the Corporation and become a part of the records of the Corporation as of the date first appearing above. This Action
by Written Consent may be signed electronically, by counterpart, and by fax.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed
this Action by Written Consent as of the date first written above.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed
this Action by Written Consent on the 8th of September 2021.


 


 


	 	/s/ Lynda Chervil	 
	 	Lynda Chervil, Director	 


 


 


 





 



.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MITCHELL D. DIVENTURA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 19 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of March, 2017, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
Exhibit 99.1



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Board of Directors

The Standard Register Company

Dayton, Ohio



We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of April 3, 2005 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the thirteen week periods ended April 3, 2005 and March 28, 2004.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.



We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.



Based upon our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of January 2, 2005 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 10, 2005, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of January 2, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP







Dayton, Ohio

April 26, 2005
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00459-CR

Andrey Cardiel Martinez

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-1445-16-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court 

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 27, 2017
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

NCWPCS MPL 19-YEAR SITES TOWER HOLDINGS, LLC; CCATT, LLC; 

and GLOBAL SIGNAL ACQUISITIONS, IV, LLC,

Appellants,

v.

ROBERT DANIEL KEENE, an individual, D&B LANDSCAPING, LLC, and 

MBD TOWER ENTERPRISES, LLC,

Appellees.

No. 2D22-4094

March 20, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Rex Martin 

Barbas, Judge.

Jack J. Aiello, Christopher P. Benvenuto, and John A. Schifino of 

Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellants.

Raymond T. Elligett, Jr. and Amy S. Farrior of Buell & Elligett, P.A., 

Tampa, for Appellees.

Mark A. Linsky of Mark A. Linsky, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees Robert 

Daniel Keene and D&B Landscaping, LLC.

Walter O. Hobbs of Hobbs and Hobbs, P.L., Tampa, for Appellee MBD 

Tower Enterprises, LLC.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
2

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATIONS Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 
2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of Sterling Bancorp, a New York
corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that: The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2005
(the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Dated: November 8, 2005
  
  /s/ Louis J.
  CappelliName:
  Louis J.
  CappelliTitle:
  Chairman and
  Chief Executive Officer Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Sterling Bancorp, a New York corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that: The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2005
(the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: November 8, 2005
  
  /s/ John W.
  TietjenName:
  John W.
  TietjenTitle:
  Executive
  Vice President andChief Financial Officer The
foregoing certifications are being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and are not being filed as part of
the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 45
#### Theresa McGuire, Respondent, v Joseph A. Epstein et al., Defendants, and Hayt, Hayt & Landau, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages based on allegations of abuse of process and malicious prosecution, the defendant Hayt, Hayt & Landau appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Goldstein, J.), dated March 14,1989, as denied that branch of its motion which was to dismiss the plaintiffs second cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) insofar as it is asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

According every favorable inference to the allegations of the plaintiffs second cause of action *(see generally, Sanders v Winship,*57 NY2d 391; *Pollnow v Poughkeepsie Newspapers,*107 AD2d 10, *affd*67 NY2d 778), we conclude that a prima facie claim based on the tort of malicious prosecution has been stated. As noted by the Supreme Court, the plaintiffs allegations, construed liberally, allow for proof that the underlying action brought by the appellant was " 'abandoned at the instance of the [appellant] under circumstances which fairly imply the plaintiffs innocence’ ” *(Pagliarulo v Pagliarulo,*30 AD2d 840, quoting 1 Harper and James, Law of Torts § 4.4, at 307; *see also, Loeb v Teitelbaum,*77 AD2d 92, 97-101; *Louvad Realty Corp. v Anfang,*267 App Div 567; 59 NY Jur 2d, False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution, § 63, at 325; Annotation, *Nature of Termination of Civil Action Required to Satisfy Element of Favorable Termination to Support Action for Malicious Prosecution,*30 ALR4th 572). We also agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs complaint adequately alleges the remaining elements of the tort of malicious prosecution. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.
MATRICE 600 SPECS

AIRCRAFT

STRUCTURE

Diagonal Wheelbase 1133 mm

Aircraft Dimensions ● 1668 mm x 1518 mm x 759 mm

(Propellers, frame arms and GPS mount

unfolded)

● 640 mm x 582 mm x 623 mm (Frame arms

and GPS mount folded)

Package Dimensions 620 mm x 320 mm x 505 mm

Intelligent Flight Battery Quantity 6

Weight (with six TB47S batteries) 9.1 kg

Weight (with six TB48S batteries) 9.6 kg

Max Takeoff Weight 15.1 kg

PROPULSION SYSTEM

Motor Model DJI 6010

Propeller Model DJI 2170

OTHER

Supported DJI Gimbals Zenmuse X3; Zenmuse X5 series; Zenmuse XT;

Ronin­MX; Zenmuse Z15 series HD gimbals:

Z15­A7, Z15­BMPCC, Z15­5D III, Z15­GH4

Retractable Landing Gear Standard

Operating Temperature 14° to 104° F (­10° to 40° C)

CHARGER

Model A14­100P1A

Voltage Output 26.3 V
Power Rating 100 W

BATTERY (OPTIONAL)

Model TB48S

Capacity 5700 mAh

Voltage 22.8 V

Type LiPo 6S

Energy 129.96 Wh

Net Weight 680 g

Operating Temperature 14° to 104° F (­10° to 40° C)

Storage Temperature ● Less than 3 months: ­4° to 113° F (­20° to

45° C)

● More than 3 months: 72° to 82° F (22° to

28° C)

Charge Temperature 41° to 104° F (5° to 40° C)

Max Charging Power 180 W

PERFORMANCE

Hovering Accuracy (P­Mode, with

GPS)

Vertical: ±0.5 m, Horizontal: ±1.5 m

Max Angular Velocity Pitch: 300°/s, Yaw: 150°/s

Max Pitch Angle 25°

Max Speed of Ascent 5 m/s

Max Speed of Descent 3 m/s

Max Wind Resistance 8 m/s

Max Flight Altitude above Sea

Level

2500 m

Max Speed 18 m/s (No wind)

Hovering Time (with six TB47S

batteries)*

No payload: 35 min, 6 kg payload: 16 min
Hovering Time (with six TB48S

batteries)*

No payload: 40 min, 5.5 kg payload: 18 min

* The hovering time is based on flying at 10 m

above sea level in a no­wind environment and

landing with 10% battery level.

FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM

Model A3

REMOTE CONTROLLER

Operating Frequency ● 920.6 MHz to 928 MHz (Japan)

● 5.725 GHz to 5.825 GHz

● 2.400 GHz to 2.483 GHz

Max Transmission Distance

(unobstructed, free of interference)

● FCC Compliant: 3.1 miles (5 km)

● CE Compliant: 2.1 miles (3.5 km)

EIRP ● 10 dBm @ 900 M/li>

● 13 dBm @ 5.8 G

● 20 dBm @ 2.4 G

Video Output Port HDMI, SDI, USB

Dual Users Capability Master­and­Slave control

Mobile Device Holder Supports smartphones and tablets

Output Power 9 W

Operating Temperature 14° to 104° F (­10° to 40° C)

Storage Temperature ● Less than 3 months: ­4° to 113° F (­20° to

45° C)

● More than 3 months: 72° to 82° F (22° to

28° C)

Charge Temperature 32° to 104° F (0° to 40° C)

Built­in Battery 6000 mAh, 2S LiPo

Max Tablet Width 170 mm

BATTERY (STANDARD)

Model TB47S

Capacity 4500 mAh
Voltage 22.2 V

Type LiPo 6S

Energy 99.9 Wh

Net Weight 595 g

Operating Temperature 14° to 104° F (­10° to 40° C)

Storage Temperature ● Less than 3 months: ­4° to 113° F (­20° to

45° C)

● More than 3 months: 72° to 82° F (22° to

28° C)

Charge Temperature 41° to 104° F (5° to 40° C)

Max Charging Power 180 W
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00462-ADA

ORDER RESETTING MARKMAN MARKMAN HEARING HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is reset for

MARKMAN HEARING by zoomoom on Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 09:00 AM.

reset

IT 23rd day of March, 2021.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 60 Filed 03/23/21 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00454-ADA

PATENT CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL

RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6)

Having considered Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12(b)(6), the Court finds the motion should be DENIED. It is, therefore, DENIED.

Date: 

PRESIDING JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 27-1 Filed 09/17/20 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7814

JEFFREY ALLEN CARTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE; LONNIE SAUNDERS, Warden;

WARDEN HOLLAR; MAJOR REDMAN, Grievance Officer; LIEUTENANT SANTIAGO; SERGEANT SCOTT; SERGEANT HARDIN; SNYDER, C/O; OFFICER JONES; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CONNER; SERGEANT THOMPSON,

Investigator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-00-951-7)

Submitted: April 6, 2001 Decided: July 9, 2001

Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Jeffrey Allen Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Allen Carter appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint

and denying reconsideration of that order. The district court

dismissed Carter’s sexual harassment claims without prejudice

because he did not allege physical injury pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 1997e(e) (West Supp. 2000). Because Carter may re-file his complaint to allege physical injury, the order in question is not a

final, appealable order as to those claims. See Domino Sugar Corp.

v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.

1993). Accordingly, we dismiss Carter’s appeal as to the sexual

harassment claims for lack of jurisdiction.

We have reviewed the record as to the remaining claims and the

district’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court as to

all other claims. Carter v. Angelone, No. CA-00-951-7 (W.D. Va.

Dec. 11 and 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5476 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5476

  To suspend temporarily the duty on ceramic bases designed for high 
   intensity discharge (HID) lamps, with metal locking pins to allow 
                   passage of an electrical current.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on ceramic bases designed for high 
   intensity discharge (HID) lamps, with metal locking pins to allow 
                   passage of an electrical current.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERAMIC BASES DESIGNED FOR HIGH INTENSITY DISCHARGE (HID) 
              LAMPS, WITH METAL LOCKING PINS TO ALLOW PASSAGE OF AN 
              ELECTRICAL CURRENT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Ceramic bases       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          designed for high                                                 12/31/2015
                          intensity
                          discharge (HID)
                          lamps, with metal
                          locking pins to
                          allow passage of
                          an electrical
                          current (provided
                          for in subheading
                          8536.61.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Parts 36
          - [Docket No. FAA-2000-7958; Notice No. 00-12]
          - RIN 2120-AH10 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

 Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to the notice of proposed rulemaking, published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on October 5, 2000 (65 FR 59634). That NPRM proposed changes to the noise certification regulations for helicopters. Those proposed  changes are based on a joint effort by the FAA, the European Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA), and Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC), to harmonize the U.S. noise certification regulations and the European Joint Aviation Requirements (JAR) for helicopter. The harmonization of the noise certification standards would simplify airworthiness approvals for import and export purposes.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandy Liu, (202) 493-4864.

## Correction of Publication

                        In NPRM FR Doc. 00-24634, beginning on page 59634 in the                         **Federal Register**                         issue of October 5, 2000, make the following corrections:                    

1. On page 59634, in column 1, in the heading section, beginning on line 4, correct “Notice No. 00-11” to read “Notice No. 00-12”.

Issued in Washington, DC on October 10, 2000.

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel, Regulations Division.

[FR Doc. 00-26513  Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Union Pacific
Railroad Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Richard K. Davidson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/ Richard K. Davidson
    ------------------------------
    Richard K. Davidson
    Chairman and
    Chief Executive Officer
    Union Pacific Railroad Company

August 8, 2002
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sterling Group Ventures Inc. (the
  Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2003, as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic
  Report), I, Brian C. Doutaz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

| | By: | /s/ Brian C. Doutaz  
| | --- | -----------------------
| |     |                        
| |     | Brian C. Doutaz        
| |     | Chief Executive Officer
| |     |                        
| |     | Date: August 28, 2003  

---