alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To: Federal Aviation Administration

From: Jesse Werle Subject: Petition to Amend Exemption No. 13612 Date: 30 November 2015 This letter is to create an amendment to the current FAA Section 333 Exemption granted to Jesse Werle granted on the 16 day of November 2015 . The Exempt ion Number is 13612 , and the R egulatory Docket N o. FAA - 2015 - 3761
. I would like to amend the following airframes: Airframe Manual Inspire 1 http://download.dji

innovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.0_en.pdf Phantom 3 Professional http://download.dji

innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_ v1.0_en.pdf S900 http://dl.djicdn.com/downloads/s900/en/S900_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf S1000 ` http://download.dji

innovations.com/downloads/s1000/en/S1000_User_Manual_v1.00_en.pdf Iris+ https://3drobotics.com/wp

- content/uploads/2014/04/IRIS

- Operation
- Manual

- v6.pdf 3DR x8 https://3drobotics.com/wp

- content/uploads/2014/03/RTF

- X8
- Manual

- V2.pdf Allowing these aircraft to be am ended to the current 333 request would allow us to expand to a more useful service. The Inspire one wil l be used to fly high

- end Real

- Estate missions, while the Phantom 3 is used for the low er - end Real

- Estate production. The s 900 and s1000 are also used to film large ranches, and film high value targets. These could include ranches, estates , historical m onuments, and events. The iris+ as well as the x8 are examples for our sensory platforms. Both machines allow us to carry differen t se nsor platforms that we develop, and aid in future devel opment.
# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 12 to the Treasury Department Circular 570; 1999 Revision, published July 1, 1999, at 64 FR 35864.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6779.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable reinsurer on Federal bonds is hereby issued to the following Company under 31 U.S.C. 9304 to 9308. Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 1998 Revision, on page 35895 to reflect this addition:                     *Gerling Global Reinsurance Corporation of America. Business address: 717 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10022.*                     Phone: (212) 754-7500. Underwriting Limitation b/: $34,265,000. Incorporated in: New York.                

Certificates of Authority expire on June 30 each year, unless revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (31 CFR Part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1 in Treasury Department Circular 570, with details as to underwriting limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety business and other information.

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     Start Printed Page 5930http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570/​index.html. A hard copy may be purchased from the Government Printing Office (GPO) Subscription Service, Washington, DC, Telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use the following stock number: 048000-00527-6.                

Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6A04, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: January 24, 2000.

Wanda J. Rogers,

Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial Management Service.

[FR Doc. 00-2603 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

___________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 133858 Justices 

TIMOTHY TERRY, #327307 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 133858 

 CoA: 272976 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

On order of the Chief Justice, it appearing that appellant has failed to tender 

the entry fee prescribed by MCR 7.319 (B)(7) and has failed to provide documentation to 

permit the calculation of an appropriate partial fee, the Clerk is directed to close this file. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 21, 2007 

Clerk
#### WYATT v. STATE.

No. 25340.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1951.

*320Croslin & Pharr, Lubbock, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for transporting liquor for the purpose of sale with a 'fine of $100.

We find no final judgment in this case and no notice of appeal. Following the judgment a motion for new trial was filed, but no action was taken thereon. The recognizance entered into, as it appears in the record, is designated as “notice of appeal” but merely states that a notice had been given. We find none in the transcript. Consequently, we are without jurisdiction to consider the matters involved.

The appeal is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 198 (Thursday, October 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60657-60658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP94-367-011]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Pro Forma 
Compliance Filing

October 5, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 29, 2000, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) tendered for filing pro forma tariff sheets to 
be part

[[Page 60658]]

of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, to implement the 
Gathering Settlement, approved by the Commission on February 16, 1996. 
National Fuel states that, pursuant to the Gathering Settlement, the 
revised rates are to be effective on April 1, 2001.
    National states that, pursuant to Article IV, Section 2, of the 
Gathering Settlement, National is required to submit a Compliance 
filing to eliminate the Amortization Surcharge from its transmission 
rates by removing the gathering A&G costs, the interest and taxes 
related to the amortization of the ``Plant to be Amortized,'' and the 
amortization component of the transmission cost-of-service. Also, 
National is revising the Gathering cost-of-service to reflect 
$1,575,000 of A&G costs.
    National states that copies of this filing were served upon its 
current customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26124 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Joseph Gallo, Michael Ciccarelli and Victor Venezia, Defendants.

County Court, Kings County,

November 18, 1957.

*David F. Price*for *Victor Venesia,*defendant.

*Edward S. Silver, District Attorney (Albert V. De Meo*of counsel), for plaintiff.

Carmine J. Marasco, J.

Motion for a bill of particulars is granted to the following extent: Item 1: The District Attorney is to specify whether or not defendants or either of them compelled the complainant to do or abstain from doing an act as specified in the language of section 530 of the Penal Law. Items 2, 3 and 4 are disposed of by directing the District Attorney to specify the subdivisions of section 530 of the Penal Law upon which he intends to rely on the trial so that the defendants can properly prepare for trial. Items 5, 6 and 7 are also disposed of by directing the District Attorney to specify the subdivisions of section 244 of the Penal Law upon which he intends to rely on the trial so that defendants can properly prepare for trial.

Settle order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       7,012,000
<SECURITIES>                                    48,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               46,449,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   476,000
<INVENTORY>                                 95,325,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           137,670,000
<PP&E>                                      12,440,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,455,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             175,116,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       55,157,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,566,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,444,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               175,116,000
<SALES>                                     93,535,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            96,036,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,775,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            40,642,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             289,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,330,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,284,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,046,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,046,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
        

</TABLE>
## ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# Ifrfr7*/ft
COA# 01-13-01022-CR 

### OFFENSE: 29.03 (Aggravated Robbery) Steve Lee Dorseyv. The State of 

### STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Harris COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 209th District Court DATE: 11/20/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1249910



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Steve LeeDorseyv. The State of 

### STYLE: Texas 

## APPBLlAS/t\ Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: CCA#: 

# tWI'tt DATE: _ JUDGE: 

### CCA Disposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC RECORD
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC, d/b/a

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT

Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00458

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR

DEFENDANT MICROSOFT CORPORATION

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, defendant Microsoft Corporation 

(“Microsoft”) states that it is a publicly held corporation, has no parent corporation, and no 

publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. 

Dated: September 3, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Suite 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

(512) 263-2165 (Telephone)

(512) 263-2166 (Facsimile)

Michael J. Bettinger 

Irene Yang

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

555 California Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94104

mbettinger@sidley.com

irene.yang@sidley.com

Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 21 Filed 09/03/20 Page 1 of 3
2

(415) 772-1200 (Telephone)

(415) 772-7400 (Facsimile)

Richard A. Cederoth 

John W. McBride 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

One South Dearborn Street

Chicago, IL 60603

rcederoth@sidley.com

jwmcbride@sidley.com

(312) 853-7000 (Telephone)

(312) 853-7036 (Facsimile)

Attorneys for Microsoft Corporation

Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 21 Filed 09/03/20 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on September 3, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 

Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all counsel of 

record.

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

 Barry K. Shelton

Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 21 Filed 09/03/20 Page 3 of 3
(Proposed Sur-Reply)

Exhibit A

FULLY REDACTED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.5

PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES

      [PHH LOGO]

February 25, 2005

Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc,
One Belvedere Place, Suite 330
Mill Valley, CA 94941

HSBC Bank USA
452 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10018

RE:   Annual Statement as to Compliance

Investor number(s)/Deal name(s); 168/ SEQUOIA 2003-6

Dear Investor, Master Servicer or Trustee,

The undersigned officer certifies the following for PHH Mortgage Corp. f/k/a
Cendant Mortgage Corp., for the 2004 calendar year. To the best of Our
knowledge:

      a)    The activities and performances of the Servicer during the
            preceding Fiscal year under the terms of the above Servicing
            Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or
            Servicer Guide and to the best of my knowledge the Servicer has
            fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities or obligations under
            this Agreement throughout such year, or if there has been default or
            failure of the Servicer to perform any such duties, responsibilities
            or obligations, a description of each default or failure and the
            nature and status thereof has been reported to HSBC Bank USA;

      b)    The Servicer is currently an approved FNMA or FHLMC Servicer in good
            standing;

      c)    The Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions Insurance Policy and any
            other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing Agreement,
            Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer
            Guide are in full force and effect;

      d)    All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood Insurance
            Policy (if applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if
            applicable), with respect to each Mortgaged Property, have been paid
            and that such insurance policies are in full force and effect;

      e)    All real estate taxes, governmental assessments and any other
            expenses accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or
            encumbrance on any Mortgage Property, have been paid, or if any such
            costs or expenses have been paid with respect to any Mortgaged
            Property, the reason for the non-payment has been reported to HSBC
            Bank USA:

      f)    All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded;
            and

      g)    All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgaged
            Property required per section 6050H, 6050J and 6050P of the Internal
            Revenue Code, respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified by

/s/ William E. Fricke, Jr.
--------------------------
William E. Fricke, Jr.
Assistant Vice President

FEB 25, 2005
--------------------------
Date: February 25, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Safety and Occupational Health Study Section, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), of the Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period beginning June 30, 2000, through June 30, 2002. 

For further information, contact Charles N. Rafferty, NIOSH Scientific Review Administrator,Safety and Occupational Health Study Section, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4114, MSC 7816, Bethesda, MD 20892 (20817 overnight mail), 301/435-3562 FAX 301/480-2644—Email: Raffertc@csr.nih.gov. 

The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 

Dated: October 4, 2000. 

Carolyn J. Russell, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 00-26138 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Union Pacific
Railroad Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Richard K. Davidson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



By:   /s/ Richard K. Davidson
     ------------------------------
      Richard K. Davidson
      Chairman and
      Chief Executive Officer
      Union Pacific Railroad Company


November 13, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5580 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5580

     To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic and natural beta 
                               carotenes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic and natural beta 
                               carotenes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SYNTHETIC AND NATURAL BETA CAROTENES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Synthetic and       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        natural beta                                                       31/2015.......
                        carotenes (CAS
                        No. 7235-40-7)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3204.19.35)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

EDWARD JOHNSON, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

v. § 1:20-CV-600-RP

§

SHERIFF SALLY HERNANDEZ, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

Before the Court is the order and report and recommendation of United States Magistrate 

Judge Mark Lane concerning Petitioner Edward Johnson’s (“Johnson”) Application for Writ of 

Habeas Corpus Reduction of Excessive Bail, (Dkt. 1). (R. & R., Dkt. 14). Judge Lane granted 

Johnson’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, (Dkt. 2), severed Johnson’s Supplemental 

Complaint, (Dkt. 8), into a new case, and substituted Sheriff Hernandez as the respondent in this 

case. (Id. at 7). In his report and recommendation, Judge Lane recommends that the Court dismiss 

without prejudice Johnson’s Application. (Id.). Johnson timely filed objections to the report and 

recommendation. (Objs., Dkt. 18). 

A party may serve and file specific, written objections to a magistrate judge’s findings and 

recommendations within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report and 

recommendation and, in doing so, secure de novo review by the district court. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(C). Because Johnson timely objected to each portion of the report and recommendation, 

the Court reviews the report and recommendation de novo. Having done so, the Court overrules 

Johnson’s objections and adopts the report and recommendation as its own order.

Case 1:20-cv-00600-RP Document 19 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the report and recommendation of United States 

Magistrate Judge Mark Lane, (Dkt. 14), is ADOPTED. Johnson’s Application for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus Reduction of Excessive Bail, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SIGNED on December 14, 2020.

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00600-RP Document 19 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 2