alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


OF
SKINNY NUTRITIONAL CORP.


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Skinny Nutritional Corp. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald
J. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that:





(1)
    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date: March
      31, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Donald
      J. McDonaldDonald
      J. McDonaldChief
      Financial Officer





This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 31.2



I, F. F. Falls, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Community First Financial Corporation.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 29, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ F. F. Falls                         
|                     |  |  |  | F. F. Falls                             
|                     |  |  |  | Vice President Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of JohnsonDiversey, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 19, 2008 |  | /s/ Edward F. Lonergan                              
|                     |  | Edward F. Lonergan                                  
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                     | 
|                     |  | /s/ Joseph F. Smorada                               
|                     |  | Joseph F. Smorada                                   
|                     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-8
OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460



## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)

***Final Site*** September 2015



### ESTECH GENERAL

CHEMICAL COMPANY Calumet City, Illinois

Cook County

 **Site Location:** 

The Estech site is a 54- acre inactive facility located in a heavily industrialized area at 150 Marble Street, Calumet City,

Illinois.

 **Site History:** 

Estech manufactured pesticides and fertilizers at the site from approximately 1952 to 1969. From the late 1980s until 1996,

the site was an open dump for auto fluff waste. The property is currently abandoned.

 **Site Contamination/Contaminants:** 

Elevated levels of a range of contaminants have been found in site soils, sediment and ground water. The principal

contaminants are polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides, metals, and semi

- volatile organic compounds (SVOCs).

Auto fluff waste containing PCBs, pesticides, SVOCs and metals is present at the site, up to 20 feet in depth. Elevated

levels of these same contaminants can also be found at the former lagoon system area which covered approximately 7.5

acres of the site.

 **Potential Impacts**  **on Surrounding**  **Community/Environment:**

An on

- site wetland is contaminated. The Grand Calumet River borders the southern boundary of the site. There are fish

consumption advisories in the Calumet River system due to the presence of PCBs.

 **Response Activities**  **(to date):** 

In 1999, the EPA placed a six to twelve inch soil barrier over approximately 27 acres of auto fluff.

 **Need for**  **NPL Listing:** 

The state of Illinois referred the site to the EPA. There are no other programs available to effectively undertake a

comprehensive site investigation or clean

- up. The EPA received a letter of support for placing this site to the NPL from the

state of Illinois. Calumet City also expressed support for NPL Listing to the state of Illinois.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change

as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these

substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1- 888

- 42

- ATSDR or 1

- 888

- 422

- 8737.
#### MASSINGTON v. STATE.

No. 22899.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 14, 1944.

Everett H. O’Dowd, of Waco, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of Coryell County for the violation of the liquor law, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $225 and three months’ confinement in the county jail.

The complaint and information appear regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

JERRY BRIAN INWOOD, 

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 

Respondent

______________________

2024-1469

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. CH-0752-17-0461-I-1.

______________________

O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to file the required 

Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is 

Case: 24-1469 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 04/11/2024
2 INWOOD V. DHS

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the

same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

April 11, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 11, 2024

Case: 24-1469 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 04/11/2024
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6500

BILLY LEE LISENBY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHERAW CHRONICLE; OFFICER DEAVER; JOHN T. MAYFIELD; DOUGLAS CURTIS; NATE BURROUGHS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-96-2580-4-18BE)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Curtis, Appellee; L. Hunter Limbaugh, WILLCOX, MCLEOD, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A.,

Florence, South Carolina; Michael R. Sullivan, HOWSER, NEWMAN &

BESLEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error in the denial of relief

on Appellant's defamation claim. Accordingly, we affirm that portion of the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lisenby

v. Cheraw Chronicle, No. CA-96-2580-4-18BE (D.S.C. Mar. 19, 1997).

Appellant also appeals the district court's order dismissing

his claim of excessive force during arrest on res judicata grounds.

Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that

relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely

objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of

a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this

warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's

recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court denying

relief on Appellant's excessive force claim. We deny Appellant's
3

motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM    We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries for the period ended June 28, 2009, as indicated in our report dated July 29, 2009; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements File No.'s 333-02683, 333-05231, 333-15851, 333-43055, 333-51189, 333-51181, 333-57779, 333-84483 and 333-86492.  We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.    /S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP     Dayton, Ohio July 29, 2009
#### A. C. LOGGINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27241.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 1, 1954.

No appearance for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Houston, Eugene Brady, Asst. Dist. Atty., Wesley Dice,State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for the offense of passing a forged instrument, with a prior conviction alleged for enhancement purposes; the punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has now filed his personal affidavit requesting the dismissal of the appeal, which request is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1 

**CERTIFICATION**

          **Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

          Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Sterling Bancorp, a New York corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that: 

          The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|   |                                                               |                  |   |   |   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Dated: |   5/7/10                                                 | /s/ Louis J. Cappelli |
|   |                                                                    |                  |        |
|   | Name:  Louis J. Cappelli                                 |
|   | Title:    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|        |                                                                    |                       |        |        |        |        |  |  |

          The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 

58

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC

d/b/aBRAZOS LICENSING 

AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., 

DELL INC., EMC CORPORATION, 

and VMWARE, INC.

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00473-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00475-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00476-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00477-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00480-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00481-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00482-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00485-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00486-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES

This Court, having considered disputes raised by Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a 

Brazos Licensing and Development (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., 

EMC Corporation, and VMWare, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) during the March 11, 2022, 

Discovery Hearing, hereby ORDERS the following:

1. Defendants’ request to compel documents regarding Plaintiff’s offers to sell or

license the patents-in-suit, including pre-suit offers to license or sell the patents-in-suit by thirdparty AQUA, is DENIED;

2. Defendants’ request to compel Plaintiff to provide a privilege log is DENIED. 

Defendants’ request to compel Plaintiff to log any pre-suit investigation, or other infringement or 

technical analysis is DENIED. Neither party is required to search or log emails or email 

attachments, including, with respect to Plaintiff, emails and email attachments regarding any presuit investigation, or other infringement or technical analysis;

Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 174 Filed 03/21/22 Page 1 of 2
1 

3. Plaintiff’s request to compel Defendants to produce source code for all functions

listed in the submitted dispute chart and referenced in the produced source code for U.S. Patent 

Nos. 7,443,888 (6:20-cv-00475-ADA), 9,164,800 (6:20-cv-00481-ADA) and 7,092,360 (6:20-cv00486-ADA) is GRANTED. 

4. Plaintiff’s request to compel Defendants to produce source code on products

accused of infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 9,137,144 (6:20-cv-00473-ADA), 7,565,435 (6:20-cv00476-ADA) and 7,424,020 (6:20-cv-00482-ADA) is DENIED. 

5. Plaintiff’s request for relief from the stipulated schedule to serve subpoenas on

third-party chipmakers to produce source code on products accused of infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 

9,137,144 (6:20-cv-00473-ADA), 7,565,435 (6:20-cv-00476-ADA) and 7,424,020 (6:20-cv00482-ADA) is GRANTED. 

Signed this 21st day of March, 2022. 

____________________________________ 

HON. ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 174 Filed 03/21/22 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Randgold Resources Limited(the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the yearended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Roger A. Williams, Finance Director of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

|  |           |                                                                                                                    |
|--|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (4)  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (5)  | The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Roger A. Williams Roger A. WilliamsFinance Director October 12,2005

----
Docket No: Faa - 2015 - 0075 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 202 -AD
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 200 (Monday, October 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 61178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT-010-1220-HA]


Notice of Closure of Certain Public Lands to the Use of Motorized 
Vehicles

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of closure of certain public lands to the use of 
motorized vehicles.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that motorized vehicle use is allowed 
only on Crooked Creek Road and the parking lot of the 17-Mile Area. The 
remaining lands at the 17-Mile Area are closed to motorized vehicle 
use. The 17-Mile Area is located 12 miles north of Billings, Montana on 
Crooked Creek Road west of Montana Highway 87. This closure is 
necessary for public safety and resource protection on lands used for 
firearms target practice.
    Designation and location of public lands:

    Open to motorized vehicle use: Crooked Creek Road and the 
adjoining parking lot,

T. 3 N., R. 26 E., P.M.M.,
    Sec. 9, E\1/2\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 10, S\1/2\S\1/2\SW\1/4\.

    Closed to motorized vehicle use:

T. 3 N., R. 26 E., P.M.M.,
    Sec 4, all;
    Sec. 8, W\1/2\, SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 9, NE\1/4\, W\1/2\, NE\1/4\SE\1/4\, W\1/2\SE\1/4\, W\1/
2\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\;
    Sec 10. NW\1/4\, N\1/2\SW\1/4\, N\1/2\S\1/2\SW\1/4\.

    Exempted from this closure are Bureau of Land Management employees 
on official business, firefighting forces, law enforcement officers, or 
persons with a permit or written authorization allowing the otherwise 
prohibited act.

    Authority: Authority for this action is outlined in sections 
302, 303, and 310 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (43 
USC 1716) and Title 43 Code of Federal Regulations, subpart 8341 (43 
CFR 8341.2) and subpart 8364 (43 CFR 8364.1). Any person who fails 
to comply with this closure is subject to arrest and a fine of up to 
$1,000 or imprisonment not to exceed 12 months, or both.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This closure is effective year-around upon the date of 
publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra S. Brooks, Field Manager, BLM, 
Billings Field Office, 5001 Southgate Drive, P.O. Box 36800, Billings, 
Montana 59107-6800 or call 406-896-5013.

    Dated: October 6, 2000.
Sandra S. Brooks,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-26440 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P