alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Philip L. Carter, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2003 of Rotech Healthcare Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:  April 13, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5597 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5597

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on C1-3 Perfluoroalkyl 
                          perfluoromorpholine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Ellison introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on C1-3 Perfluoroalkyl 
                          perfluoromorpholine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. C1-3 PERFLUOROALKYL PERFLUOROMORPHOLINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.89 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to C1-3 Perfluoroalkyl 
perfluoromorpholine) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Stephen J. Smith, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Elizabeth Arden, Inc. (the "registrant");

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: November 8, 2004
    
/s/ Stephen J. Smith
 
 
Stephen J. Smith
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)***
```

[Federal Register: February 24, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 36)]
[Notices]               
[Page 8425]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24fe10-158]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6902]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Masterpieces of European Painting From Dulwich 
Picture Gallery''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Masterpieces of European Painting from 
Dulwich Picture Gallery,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owner 
or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The Frick Collection, New York, NY, from on or about 
March 9, 2010, until on or about May 30, 2010, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 18, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-3711 Filed 2-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 99.1    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   Board of Directors The Standard Register Company Dayton, Ohio  We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company as of July 4, 2010, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009, and the related consolidated statement of cash flows for the twenty-six week periods ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.  Based upon our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company as of January 3, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 11, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of January 3, 2010 is fairly stated, in all material respects.   /S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP  Dayton, Ohio August 2, 2010
#### Royal Discount Corp., Appellant, *v.*Luxor Motor Sales Corp., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 19, 1957.

*308
      *Irving G. Schleimer*for appellant.

*Daniel Rosen*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

An assignment of a retail installment contract, by which the seller warrants that the cash down payment specified as having been paid by the purchaser was actually paid, is breached when the proof establishes that the down payment was in fact less than the amount so warranted *(Commercial Credit Corp.*v. *Third & Lafayette Sts. Garage,*226 App. Div. 235; *Northeast Discount Corp.*v. *Queens Hill Motors,*150 N. Y. S. 2d 848).

The terms “costs” and “expenses” as employed in the assignment agreement do not include attorney’s fees, and attorney’s fees are not recoverable in the absence of express language in the contract or statute *(Hayman*v. *Morris,*37 N. Y. S. 2d 884).

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for the plaintiff in the sum of $426.13, with interest and costs.

Hofstadter, Steher and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

STANDING ORDER REGARDING

FILING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN PATENT CASES AND REDACTED 

PLEADINGS

As a public forum, the Court has a policy of providing to the public full access to 

documents filed with the Court. Nevertheless, parties in patent cases routinely produce and rely 

on information that is confidential. Therefore, in all patent cases pending before the undersigned, 

the Court hereby grants leave for any party to file materials containing confidential information 

under seal without filing a separate motion seeking leave of the Court to do so. The filing party 

shall file a publicly available, redacted version of any motion or pleading filed under seal within 

seven days. The parties need not file redacted versions of exhibits to such documents. Exhibits 

that are nonconfidential in their entirety should not be filed under seal at all. The parties shall 

coordinate to make sure that the public version filing redacts information that any party deems 

confidential. Redactions should be targeted to redact only that information. The publicly 

available version shall be labeled “PUBLIC VERSION.” Cooperating to file the public version 

shall not be deemed as agreeing that the redacted information is actually confidential. 

This Order shall apply in all patent cases, but shall not require parties to file public 

versions of pleadings filed before the date of this Order. 

SIGNED this ___ day of February, 2021. 

_________________________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12th

FILED

DEPUTY 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BY: ________________________________ February 12, 2021 Reuben Amaro

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 41 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

DAVID GREECE, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 153 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q DATED
SEPTEMBER 26, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<CIK> 0000094673
<NAME> STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                       454,535
<SECURITIES>                                 246,010
<RECEIVABLES>                                492,689 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  276,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,469,241
<PP&E>                                       301,857 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,031,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        531,701
<BONDS>                                       20,352
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      12,446
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,434,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,031,736
<SALES>                                    1,038,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,480,787
<CGS>                                        567,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                810,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             149,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              203,003
<INCOME-TAX>                                  54,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          148,103
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 148,103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.19
<FN>
   <F1> Asset values for the interim period represent
        net amounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Green Dolphin Systems Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Nicholas
Plessas, Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fully presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Nicholas Plessas

--------------------

Nicholas Plessas

President and Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer

April 18, 2005
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5362 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain macroporus adsorpent polymers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. DOLD (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain macroporus 

adsorpent polymers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MACROPORUS ADSORPENT POLY4 MERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5362 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Macroporus adsorpent 

polymer composed of 

crosslinked phenol-formaldehyde polycondesate 

resin in granular form having a mean particle size of 

0.56 to 0.76 millimeters 

(CAS No. 9003–35–4) 

(provided for in subheading 3909.40.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### McDOWELL v. STATE (three cases).

Nos. 25053, 25054, 25056.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 20, 1950.

On Rehearing March 14, 1951.

*311None on appeal.

'George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a fine of $500 upon his conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area.

The statement of facts fully supports the conviction. No question is raised on this appeal which requires our consideration.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The record in the present instance contains the same defect and is subject to the same criticism as that discussed in the opinion on motion for rehearing this day delivered in Bumguardner v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 237 S.W.2d 308.

For the reasons stated in said opinion, the motion for a rehearing herein is granted, the order of affirmance heretofore entered is set aside, and this cause is now reversed and remanded.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JACQUELINE SCHWEIGART,

Petitioner

v.

KEVIN SCHMALENBERGER, M.D. AND 

WEST SHORE ANESTHESIA 

ASSOCIATES,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 444 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

§ 

§ 

§

v. § 

§

Civil No. 6:20-cv-00507-ADA 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD, and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.,

§ 

§ 

§

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

Defendant. §

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO STAY CASE

Having considered Plaintiff Neonode Smartphone LLC (“Neonode”) and Defendants 

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (“Samsung”) Stipulation 

to Stay Case Pending Final Written Decisions in Certain Inter Partes Review Proceedings, and 

good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS this case stayed, with the exception of any 

work related to discovery in Sweden, pending the final written decision in IPR2021-00145 and, 

if rehearing is granted in IPR2021-00144, a final written decision in IPR2021-00144. 

The parties shall file status reports every six months to report the status of the IPR cases. 

The parties shall file a joint motion to lift the stay within one week of the stay condition 

becoming fulfilled.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED this 11th day of April, 2021. 

HONORABLE ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 55 Filed 04/11/22 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT
      32 .1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Al
      Kraus, Chief Executive Officer of MedaSorb Technologies Corporation (the
      "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(i)
      The
      Company's accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)
      The
      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                April 15, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Al KrausAl
                Kraus,Chief
                Executive Officer