alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
December 14 Teleconference with EPA on an Upcoming Regulation in OW

Felicia Wright to:

acabillo, bcladoosby, billy, csmith, daragon, 

dhill, dlekanoff, dmosley, dnieto, donbay, ecruz, 

ehelms, envplanner, gwagner, jamilong, 

john.banks, jrodwan, julias, ktimbana, ltyler, 

marie.barry, mcgerman, mdanforj, mdespain, 

mfsundown, naturalresources1, nezperceina, 

njohn, nweber, pballer, rhill7, ronwassillie, 

r_azuretmepa, santeeenvirodept, 

stephenbetsitty, stevecrawford, stevet, 

VrWshngtn

11/30/2010 05:31 PM

Cc:

Alfreda Mitre, Bill Patton, David Janik, Grant Jonathan, Janice 

Whitney, Jean Gamache, Lois Adams, Randy Gee, Sally Thomas, 

Willie Harris, Wolfgang Brandner, Elvira Dixon, Chris Hoff, David 

Guest, Jeff Besougloff, David Jones, Fred Leutner, Thomas Gardner, 

Chelsea Morris

Dear National Tribal Caucus,

I am writing to request your immediate assistance in spreading the word electronically to tribes in your 

Region about an upcoming tribal consultation teleconference. The consultation concerns an Office of 

Water rulemaking that would propose a set of targeted changes to the water quality standards regulation. 

Tribes-Only Session #2: "Water Quality Standards Regulatory Changes "

December 14, 2010

4:00 - 5:30 pm EDT

Teleconference phone number : (888) 689-4723

Conference ID: 27877415

This is the second consultation opportunity on this topic. The first consultation call took place on August 

19, 2010. About 80 tribes participated. EPA is holding this second call to enable a more detailed 

discussion of the regulatory changes being considered. 

I would like to invite the National Tribal Caucus to participate, as well as all tribes with an interest in water 

quality standards. The rulemaking would directly affect tribes that have been found eligible to be treated in 

the same manner as a state (TAS) for administering a water quality standards program.

The attached document contains a fact sheet about the call and a list of questions that will be discussed 

during the call. The fact sheet includes detailed instructions for the call. The questions are designed to 

obtain tribal views on the details of EPA's proposal. 

This email is part of a broader effort to notify tribes about the December 14 call. I would appreciate your

forwarding this notification to tribes as soon as possible.

We particularly want to be sure the 45 tribes with TAS for water quality standards know as soon as 

possible about the teleconference. These tribes are listed at 

http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/waterquality/standards/wqslibrary/approvtable.cfm.

We are also sending separate emails to the National Tribal Water Council, the tribal participants on the 

national August 19 teleconference,and the EPA Regional Indian Coordinators. 
I hope that you will participate, and can help us get the word out. If you have questions or concerns, 

please let us know right away.

Thank you in advance for your assistance, and please let me know if you need more information.

Felicia

Felicia Wright, Tribal Coordinator

EPA Office of Water (OW)

Phone: 202-566-1886

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Mailcode 4101M

Washington, DC 20460
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended on March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and to which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Robert E. Lowder, the
principal executive officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 5, 2008



/s/    ROBERT E.
LOWDERRobert E. Lowder Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and will be retained by The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99a


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned, as chief executive officer of The L.S. Starrett
Company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's
knowledge:

1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Douglas A. Starrett
Douglas A. Starrett
Chief Executive Officer


Dated: February 7, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. 

and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00507-ADA 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO 

EXTEND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS OF WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT AS TO 

BOTH PATENTS-IN-SUIT AND PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS OF INDIRECT 

INFRINGEMENT AND DIRECT INFRINGEMENT AS TO U.S. PATENT NO. 

8,812,993 

Before the Court is Plaintiff Neonode Smartphone LLC’s Unopposed Motion for 

Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claims of 

Willful Infringement as to Both Patents-In-Suit and Plaintiff’s Claims of Indirect 

Infringement and Direct Infringement as to U.S. Patent No. 8,812,993 (“Defendants’ 

Motion”). After consideration of the Unopposed Motion, this Court is of the opinion that 

the Motion is meritorious. It is hereby GRANTED. 

Accordingly, the deadline for Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion is 

extended up to and including October 23, 2020. 

 

Signed this day of , 2020. 

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 14-1 Filed 09/29/20 Page 1 of 2
2 

 

 Hon. Alan D. Albright, U.S.D.J. 

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 14-1 Filed 09/29/20 Page 2 of 2
----

Action brought on 13 April 2006 — DeTeMedien v OHIM (suchen.de)

(Case T-117/06)

(2006/C 143/66)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: DeTeMedien, Deutsche Telekom Medien GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany) (represented by: J. Fesenmair and I. Gehring, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘suchen.de’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38 and 42 (Application No 3 915 329)

Decision of the examiner: Partial rejection of the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: The mark applied for does have distinctive character and is not purely descriptive; thus, no absolute grounds for refusal under Article 7(1)(b) and (c) or Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) stand in the way of its registration.

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

----
#### John Brady et al., Appellants, v Public Service Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent.

In an action, *inter alia,*for a judgment declaring that the defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiff John Brady, D.D.S., in an underlying action entitled *Green v Brady*(index No. 75/85), pending in the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered November 17, 1988, which, *inter alia,*declared that the defendant was not obligated to defend or indemnify the plaintiff John Brady, D.D.S., in the underlying action.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

From May of 1980 through August of 1981, the appellant John Brady, D.D.S., was covered by a dental malpractice insurance policy issued by the respondent, Public Service Mutual Insurance Company. Beginning September 1,1981, Dr. Brady was covered by a dental malpractice insurance policy issued by the appellant Aetna Casualty & Surety Company. We agree with the Supreme Court that the failure of Dr. Brady to obtain a complete medical history from his patient, Thomas A. Green, Sr., on May 13, 1980, was not a proximate cause of the injuries suffered by Green as a result of an October *2,*1981, tooth extraction performed by Dr. Brady. Accordingly, the negligence, if any, committed by Dr. Brady occurred solely while the insurance policy issued by the appellant Aetna Casualty & Surety Company was in effect. Mengano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This is a Legend
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              69
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      403
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        334
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1025
<PP&E>                                           32934
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   28640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2536
<BONDS>                                           2470
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         26
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        8854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     28640
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4970
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    530
<INCOME-TAX>                                       175
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                355
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       355
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
UNITED STAYES EN\flRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY RGGNIX Th Hawthorna Straet San Francisco, CA041054901 

## NOV 21 2U12 Mr. JamesN. Goldstene Executive Officer CaliforniaAir Resources Board Post Office Box 2815 Sacramento, Comia 95812 /1 

### A/ Dear’i1c1stene OnNvember7, 2012, the Ci1itorntaAir Resources Board submittedrevisions to the California State 1mplientattonPlan We have revieed iriatenals submitted with the followingrules and lound that the) lullill the compktenes criteriain40 Code at Federal Regulations Part$1, Appendix V APCD/AQMJ) Rule# RuleTitle Impenul Couxny 800 General Requirements forControl ofFine Particulate Matter(PM-to) Imperial County 1804 Open Areas

-- Imperial County 805 Paved and Unpvcd Road Imperkt County 806 Conservaticn Management Practice5 This addresses all revisions in this submittal, In thecomingmonths we willreviev the complete reisious for action pursuantto Clean AirAct section 1 10(k). Questions regarding ourcompleteness review shouldbe directed to Cynthia

### G Allen at (415) 947-4120. Sincerely, 

# iihi borah Jordan/ Director, AirDiision

cc: Mr. Brad Poiriez, APCO Imperial Ciunty APCD Mr. Michael GuzzettaManager Rule Evaluation Section Stationary Source Division

1EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V
Submittal Date November 7, 2012 District Name Imperial County APCD Date Reviewed November 18, 2012 EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen Key: C NIA 0 = Complete

= Incomplete

= NotApplicable To Rule

= Material Missing 

# L 800 804 805 806 ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (perAppendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letterfrom Governor/designee X X X X (b) Evidence ofadoption X X X X (c) State/District legal authority to adopt X X X X (dl) Copyofactual rule/plan X X X X (d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out X X X X (e) Proofthat action met procedural requirements X X X X (f) Copy ofpublic notice X X X X (g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X X X X (h) Public comments & agency response X X X X TECHNICAL SUPPORT (perAppendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified X X X X (b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X X X X (c) Rule/plan emissions impact X X X X (d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A N/A N/A (e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A N/A N/A (f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions X X X X (g) Evidence oflimits & other needed requirements X X X X (i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A N/A N/A 

# J OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C C C Notes:
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Frederick’s of Hollywood Group Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  December
      13, 2010
            /s/ Thomas J. LynchThomas
      J. LynchChief
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Executive OfficerDate:  December
      13, 2010
            /s/ Thomas RendeThomas
      RendeChief
      Financial Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      Exhibit 11

                        STERLING BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Three Months Ended                Six Months Ended
                                                              June 30,                         June 30,
                                                    ----------------------------     -----------------------------
                                                       2003              2002           2003               2002
                                                    -----------      -----------     -----------       -----------
<S>                                                 <C>              <C>             <C>               <C>
Net Income                                          $ 5,860,002      $ 5,230,609     $11,706,425       $10,496,910
Less: preferred dividends                                31,351           28,178          63,144            56,554
                                                    -----------      -----------     -----------       -----------
Net income available for common
  shareholders and adjusted for
  diluted computation                               $ 5,828,651      $ 5,202,431     $11,643,281       $10,440,356
                                                    ===========      ===========     ===========       ===========
Weighted average common
  shares outstanding                                 11,867,207       12,012,021      11,863,240        12,044,270
Add dilutive effect of:
         Stock options                                  483,411          567,793         470,725           548,530
         Convertible preferred stock                    229,222          233,429         230,405           233,887
                                                    -----------      -----------     -----------       -----------
Adjusted for assumed diluted
     computation                                     12,579,840       12,813,243      12,564,370        12,826,687
                                                    ===========      ===========     ===========       ===========
Basic earnings per share                            $      0.49      $      0.44     $      0.98       $      0.87
                                                    ===========      ===========     ===========       ===========
Diluted earnings per share                          $      0.47      $      0.40     $      0.93       $      0.81
                                                    ===========      ===========     ===========       ===========
</TABLE>

                                       37
EXHIBIT C

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 47-6 Filed 12/04/20 Page 1 of 2
12/3/2020 Taxable Entity Search Results

https://mycpa.cpa.state.tx.us/coa/coaSearchBtn 1/1

Results

 Taxable Entity Search Results

 1 matches found for the search string : WSOU Investments 

If you have questions about the search results, send an email to tax.help@cpa.texas.gov. or call 1-800-

252-1386.



Name WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC

Taxpayers ID# 32073004080 

Zip 76701



Franchise Tax Account Status

As of : 12/03/2020 12:42:24

This page is valid for most business transactions but is not sufficient for filings with the Secretary

of State

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC

Texas Taxpayer Number 32073004080

Mailing Address 605 AUSTIN AVE STE 6 WACO, TX 76701-2050

 Right to Transact Business in Texas ACTIVE

State of Formation DE

Effective SOS Registration Date 01/07/2020

Texas SOS File Number 0803511650

Registered Agent Name CAPITOL CORPORATE SERVICES, INC

Registered Office Street Address 206 E 9TH STREET, STE. 1300 AUSTIN, TX 78701



Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 47-6 Filed 12/04/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 54 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 54

     To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to extend liability to 
    corporations, partnerships, and other persons having ownership 
       interests in responsible parties, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

  Mr. Connolly of Virginia (for himself and Mr. Tonko) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to extend liability to 
    corporations, partnerships, and other persons having ownership 
       interests in responsible parties, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stand by your Oil Pollution Act'' 
(or the ``STOP Act'').

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY.

    Section 1001(32) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 
2701(32)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(G) Person having ownership interest.--Any 
                corporation, partnership, or other person (other than 
                an individual) having an ownership interest (directly 
                or indirectly), in any person (including a lessee, 
                permittee, or licensee) described in any of 
                subparagraphs (A) through (F) if such ownership 
                interest is, in the aggregate, more than 25 percent of 
                the total ownership interests in such person.''.

SEC. 3. LIMITS ON LIABILITY.

    Section 1004 of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2704) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Limitation on Liability of Certain Persons.--The liability of 
a responsible party described in section 1001(32)(G) with respect to an 
incident shall not exceed the percentage of the aggregate ownership 
interests, determined at the time of such incident, of such responsible 
party in all other responsible parties with respect to such 
incident.''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply to an incident 
occurring on or after January 1, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/20

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 20 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
#### WARD v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 1, 1951.

Van Hoose & Vaughan, Paintsville, for appellant.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., Guy L. Dickinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

MOREMEN, Justice.

In the circuit court a motion for a new trial was overruled on October 4, 1950, and appellant was allowed until the last day of the next regular term of the Johnson Circuit Court to file a bill of exceptions. The bill of exceptions was approved and filed as a part of the record on the 10th day of February, 1951. The record of proceedings in the circuit court and a motion for appeal in this court were filed in the office of the clerk on April 12, 1951.

Section 348 of the Criminal Code of Practice' provides in part: “The party desiring a review of any such judgment shall cause to be prepared by the clerk of the circuit court a record of the proceedings in that court and file same with the clerk of the Court of Appeals within sixty days after the motion for a new trial in the' circuit court has been acted upon, or within sixty days after the bill of exceptions is approved and filed as a part of the record, and shall at the same time file a motion for an appeal from the judgment.” ' ,

In the instant case the record and motion for appeal were not filed within the *230time limits set out under Section 348 of the Criminal Code of Practice.

In the case of Shoupe v. Commonwealth, 309 Ky. 245, 217 S.W.2d 309, 311, it was said: “We have consistently held that Sec. 348 of the Criminal Code [of Practice] is mandatory and we do not acquire jurisdiction unless the procedure therein is followed. Gilbert v. Commonwealth, 265 Ky. 154, 95 S.W.2d 1118; Pickett v. Commonwealth, 293 Ky. 842, 170 S.W.2d 876.”

The motion for appeal is overruled.