alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                   
|New Mexico Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                   
|New Mexico Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 240    | 39     | 117    | 53     | 122    | 129    | 213    | 113    | 118    | 64    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 57     | 126    | 244    | 34     | 4      | 124    | 21     | 146    | 267    | 339   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 125    | 335    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
SCWC-30059
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. CLARENCE STONE, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30059; CASE NOS. 2DTA-08-00722; 2DTA-08-01628;

2DTC-08-011610; 2DTC-09-009261)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Nakasone, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of the Motion for Reconsideration(motion) filed on March 10, 2014 by Petitioner/DefendantAppellant Clarence Stone, and the records and files herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, March 27, 2014. Hayden Aluli for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30059 27-MAR-2014 12:40 PM
#### Ex parte EDWARDS.

No. 25596.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 6, 1951.

Theo. P. Henley, San Antonio, for appellant; - • ' ' ’ ' ■=*■■■ - : ...■'

Willis E. Gresham, Asst. Atty. Gen., George P> Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

PER CURÍAM.

Relator, under sentence of death, affirmed by this Court in Edwards v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 239 S.W.2d 618, filed his application for habeas corpus before Hon. H. F. Kirby, Judge of the 77th Judicial District of Texas, alleging that hé was Illegally restrained by the Warden of the Penitentiary by reason óf certain allegations shown in the application.

The order entered by the District Judge granted this writ and .made it returnable before this Court as- provided by Arti 119, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. ■

The State-moves''that the writ be refused, or dismissed, because the facts' alleged; if true, would not entitle relator to relief, and moves that the cause be advanced and heard because the -date set for the execution is near and has not been stayed.

■ From an inspection of the transcript,' we are convinced that the facts alleged, if true, would not sustain a collateral attack upon the judgment.

In order to entitle relator to relief by habeas corpus, it was incumbent that he show that the judgment is void. See Ex parte Oliver, Tex.Cr.App., 240 S.W.2d 316.

*398The application for habeas corpus should have been denied by the trial judge.

For the reasons stated, the State’s motion is granted, the relief prayed for is denied, and no motion for rehearing will be permitted to be filed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a )

BRAZOS LICENSING AND )

DEVELEOPMENT, ) Case No. 6:20-cv-487-ADA

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA), INC., )

AND ZTE (TX), INC., )

)

Defendants )

ORDER

NOW this matter is before the Court on Defendant ZTE (TX) Inc.’s Unopposed Motion, 

filed on September 25, 2020, seeking an enlargement of time to answer or otherwise plead to the 

Complaint. The current deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise plead is September 29, 

2020. Defendant has requested an additional ten (10) days from the current deadline, until October 

9, 2020, to make its filing. Plaintiff offers no objection to the enlargement of time requested by 

Defendant.

The Court FINDS good cause exists to grant the relief requested.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Defendant shall have an additional ten (10) 

days, until Friday, October 9, 2020, to file their answer or responsive motion.

DATED THIS ____ day of _____________, 2020.

__________________________________________

ALAN D. ALBRIGHT

JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 20-1 Filed 09/25/20 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5637 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5637

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain golf bags.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

  Mr. Towns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain golf bags.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN GOLF BAGS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.24 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to golf bag bodies made of 
woven fabrics of nylon or polyester sewn together with pockets, and 
dividers or graphite protectors, accompanied with rainhoods) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5619 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on certain footwear with uppers 

of vegetable fibers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Ms. JENKINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on certain 

footwear with uppers of vegetable fibers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR WITH UPPERS OF VEGE4 TABLE FIBERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.91 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain footwear with uppers of vegetable fibers) is amend8 ed by striking the date in the effective period column and 

9 inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5619 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JUVENILE MALE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 07-50538

D.C. No. CR-07-02561-TJW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Thomas J. Whelan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Oscar F., a juvenile male, appeals from an adjudication of juvenile

delinquency, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 5032, after a finding of guilt by the district

court for multiple violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. We have jurisdiction under 28

FILED

OCT 05 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-50538

U.S.C. § 1291. We may affirm on any ground supported by the record, Dittman v.

California, 191 F.3d 1020, 1027 n.3 (9th Cir. 1999), and we affirm.

Oscar F. contends the district court lacked jurisdiction over him because the

18 U.S.C. § 5032 certification was inaccurate. The parties do not dispute that the

state authorities did not prosecute Oscar F. for the instant offenses. A de novo

review of the record reveals that the United States Attorney accurately certified

that “the State of California does not have jurisdiction” over Oscar F. See United

States v. Juvenile Male, 595 F.3d 885, 891-95 (9th Cir. 2010) (concluding that

when the appropriate state prosecutor decides not to prosecute a particular juvenile

for the specific crime at issue, the state court never obtains jurisdiction over the

juvenile); United States v. Male Juvenile, 280 F.3d 1008, 1014 (9th Cir. 2002)

(stating standard of review). Accordingly, the district court properly exercised

jurisdiction over Oscar F.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.b

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Randall J. Hylek, certify that:
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
                         STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
                         1995 EQUITY PARTICIPATION PLAN,
                  AS AMENDED THROUGH MARCH 5, 1999 (the "Plan")
               (As adopted by the Board of Directors on March 9, 2000)



Section 8.1 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and  replaced,  in lieu
thereof, with the following:


      "8.1  Option  Exercise  Price.  The  per  share  price  to be  paid by the
Participant at the time a Non-qualified  Option is exercised shall be determined
by the  Committee at the time the Stock Option is granted or amended,  but in no
event shall such  exercise  price per share be less than one hundred  percent of
the Fair Market  Value of one share of Common Stock on the date the Stock Option
is granted or amended."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations found on
pages 3, 4 and 5 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,591
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,381
<PP&E>                                      19,516,555
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (26,437)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,586,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,446,278
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        66,180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,074,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,586,599
<SALES>                                            358
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   358
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,500,911
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,966,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,467,380)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,467,380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,467,380)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.06)

</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5413 

To suspend temporarily the duty on parts and accessories of optical 

instruments and apparatuses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. HONDA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on parts and accessories 

of optical instruments and apparatuses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PARTS AND ACCESSORIES OF OPTICAL INSTRU4 MENTS AND APPARATUSES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Parts and accessories of 

optical instruments and 

apparatuses (provided for 

in subheading 9027.90.68) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5413 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5620 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5620

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to provide funding assistance to 
 State training centers certified by the Federal Emergency Management 
      Agency as capable of providing emergency response training.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

   Mr. Kind introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Defense to provide funding assistance to 
 State training centers certified by the Federal Emergency Management 
      Agency as capable of providing emergency response training.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ASSISTANCE FOR HOMELAND DEFENSE MISSION TRAINING.

    (a) Assistance Authorized.--Chapter 9 of title 32, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 909. Training assistance
    ``(a) Assistance Authorized.--To improve the training of National 
Guard units and Federal agencies performing homeland defense 
activities, the Secretary of Defense may provide funding assistance 
through a special military cooperative agreement for the operation and 
maintenance of any State training center certified by the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency as capable of providing emergency response 
training.
    ``(b) Merit-Based or Competitive Decisions.--A decision to commit, 
obligate, or expend funds under subsection (a) with or to a specific 
entity shall--
            ``(1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in 
        accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 
        of title 10 or on competitive procedures; and
            ``(2) comply with other applicable provisions of law.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``909. Training assistance.''.
                                 <all>
```
– 1 –

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

ZTE CORPORAION, ZTE (USA) 

INC, AND ZTE (TX), INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00487-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00488-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00489-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00490-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00491-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00492-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00493-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00494-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00495-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00496-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00497-ADA

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC and Defendants ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc, and 

ZTE (TX) Inc. jointly submit an Agreed Proposed Scheduling Order, attached hereto as Exhibit

A.

Date: October 29, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge 

Texas Bar No. 24059147 

Ryan S. Loveless 

Texas Bar No. 24036997 

Brett A. Mangrum 

Texas Bar No. 24065671 

Travis L. Richins 

Texas Bar No. 24061296 

Jeff Huang 

Etheridge Law Group, PLLC 

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324 

Southlake, TX 76092 

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA Document 29 Filed 10/29/20 Page 1 of 3
– 2 –

Tel.: (817) 470-7249 

Fax: (817) 887-5950 

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Jeff@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

/s/ Erick Robinson

Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig PLLC 

Erick Robinson

State Bar No. 24039142 

7215 Bosque Blvd., 

Waco, TX 76710

Telephone: (254) 870-7302

Facsimile: (713)583-9737

Email:erobinson@dbllawyers.com

David R. Keesling, 

OK Bar No. 17881

Timothy S. Kittle, 

OK Bar No. 219796660 

South Sheridan Road, Suite 250

Tulsa, Oklahoma 74133

(918) 998-9350 Telephone

(918) 998-9360 –Facsimile

dkeesling@dbllawyers.com

kittle@dbllawyers.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA Document 29 Filed 10/29/20 Page 2 of 3
– 3 –

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on October 29, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 

Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all counsel of 

record. 

/s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge 

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA Document 29 Filed 10/29/20 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5459 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5459

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain smooth nonwoven fiberglass 
                                sheets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Mr. Pitts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain smooth nonwoven fiberglass 
                                sheets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SMOOTH NONWOVEN FIBERGLASS SHEETS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         Smooth nonwoven    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          fiberglass                                                        12/31/2015
                          sheets,
                          approximately 0.3
                          mm but not over
                          0.8 mm in
                          thickness,
                          predominantly of
                          glass fibers
                          bound together in
                          a polyvinyl
                          alcohol matrix or
                          modified acrylic--
                          polyvinyl alcohol
                          matrix with a
                          formaldehyde
                          emissivity below
                          20 mgm.m^2.hr^1,
                          in wide mats
                          measuring between
                          3.5 and 5 meters,
                          the foregoing of
                          a kind primarily
                          used as carrier
                          for cushion vinyl
                          flooring
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          7019.32.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```