alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Fuller Coal & Oil Corp., Appellant, *v.*Dayton Holding Corp., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 7, 1957.

*342
      *Howard Penser*for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Upon a demand seasonably made, a party is entitled to a jury trial on a retrial, notwithstanding that a jury was not originally demanded. *(Asbestolith Mfg. Co.*v. *Howland,*143 App. Div. 418.)

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

Hofstadter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.
EXHIBIT 99.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sports Arenas,  Inc. and
susidiairies  (the "Company") for the quarterly  period ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  Harold S. Elkan, Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Steven R. Whitman, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the
Company,  each hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to the best of his
knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


    /s/ HAROLD S. ELKAN
    --------------------
        Harold S. Elkan
        Chief Executive Officer

        May 15, 2003



     /s/ STEVEN R. WHITMAN
     -----------------------
         Steven R. Whitman
         Chief Financial Officer

         May 15, 2003

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                          58,835
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    808,210
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               983,057
<PP&E>                                         228,209
<DEPRECIATION>                               (116,474)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,142,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          961,412
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    244,500
<COMMON>                                       122,603
<OTHER-SE>                                   (185,966)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,142,549
<SALES>                                        172,221
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               172,221
<CGS>                                          174,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  424,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (447,906)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (447,906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (447,906)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 198 (Thursday, October 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26232]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Applicant

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicant has filed with 
the Federal Maritime Commission an application for a license as a Non-
Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicant should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
D.C. 20573.

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicants

Helayel Inc., 235 West 37th Street, #1502, New York, NY 10001, Officer: 
Daniella Helayel, President (Qualifying Individual).

    Dated: October 6, 2000.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26232 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cytation Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin J. High, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/Kevin J. High                               Kevin J. High
President
August 19, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60970-60971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26104]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4557-N-41]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 13, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clifford Taffet, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 
20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis,

[[Page 60971]]

identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal 
buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for 
use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of 
announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable 
or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: October 5, 2000.
John D. Garrity,
Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
[FR Doc. 00-26104 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00052-CR

Pervis Lee Andrews Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County (1436114D)

July 12, 2018

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Wade Birdwell_________________

 Justice Wade Birdwell
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT McMILLEN and 

DENISE WHITE,

Petitioners,

v.

HLBF LLC, a Limited liability 

company,

Respondent.

No. 2D23-1370

February 23, 2024

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the County Court for Hillsborough 

County; Miriam Valkenburg, Judge.

Robert McMillen and Denise White, pro se.

Whitney H. Daly of The MGFD Law Firm, Clearwater, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed as moot.

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
# Classified Information Concerning the Air Force's Operating Location Near Groom Lake, Nevada

# Memorandum for the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency [and] the Secretary of the Air Force

                    I find that it is in the paramount interest of the United States to exempt the United States Air Force's operating location near Groom Lake, Nevada, (the subject of litigation in                     *Kasza v. Browner*                     (D. Nev. CV-S-94-795-PMP) and                     *Frost v. Perry*                     (D. Nev. CV-S-94-714-PMP)), from any applicable requirement for the disclosure to unauthorized persons of classified information concerning that operating location. Therefore, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6961(a), I hereby exempt the Air Force's operating location near Groom Lake, Nevada, from any Federal, State, interstate, or local provision respecting control and abatement of solid waste or hazardous waste disposal that would require the disclosure of classified information concerning that operating location to any unauthorized person. This exemption shall be effective for the full one-year statutory period.                

Nothing herein is intended to: (a) imply that in the absence of such a Presidential exemption, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) or any other provision of law permits or requires disclosure of classified information to unauthorized persons; or (b) limit the applicability or enforcement of any requirement of law applicable to the Air Force's operating location near Groom Lake, Nevada, except those provisions, if any, that would require the disclosure of classified information.

                    The Secretary of the Air Force is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 00-25742

Billing code 5001-05-M
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 528 

To require the submission of a report to the Congress on parasitic disease 

among poor Americans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2011 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia (for himself, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, and Mr. 

GENE GREEN of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the submission of a report to the Congress on 

parasitic disease among poor Americans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Neglected Infections 

5 of Impoverished Americans Act of 2011’’. 


srobinson on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 528 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE CURRENT STATE OF 

2 PARASITIC DISEASES THAT HAVE BEEN 

3 OVERLOOKED AMONG THE POOREST AMERI4 CANS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 12 months after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 

7 Health and Human Services shall report to the Congress 

8 on the epidemiology of, impact of, and appropriate funding 

9 required to address neglected diseases of poverty, includ10 ing neglected parasitic diseases such as— 

11 (1) Chagas disease; 

12 (2) cysticercosis; 

13 (3) toxocariasis; 

14 (4) toxoplasmosis; 

15 (5) trichomoniasis; 

16 (6) the soil-transmitted helminths; and 

17 (7) other related parasitic diseases, as des18 ignated by the Secretary. 

19 (b) REQUIRED INFORMATION.—The report under 

20 subsection (a) should provide the information necessary to 

21 guide future health policy to— 

22 (1) accurately evaluate the current state of 

23 knowledge concerning diseases described in such 

24 subsection and define gaps in such knowledge; and 

25 (2) address the threat of such diseases. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4509 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Benzene, 2,4-dichloro-1,3- 

dinitro-5-(trifluoromethyl). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Benzene, 

2,4-dichloro-1,3-dinitro-5-(trifluoromethyl). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENZENE, 2,4-DICHLORO-1,3-DINITRO-5- 

4 (TRIFLUOROMETHYL). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.56 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 Benzene, 2,4-dichloro-1,3-dinitro-5-(trifluoromethyl)) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4509 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 3989 Directorate Identifier: 

### 201 4

- NM

- 250

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 / h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### In spection and

replacement of

discrepant COG per

container 2 .0 $ 170.00 $ 

### 390 $ 560.00 

### 953 $ 533,680.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance: 

### 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 533,680



### Costs covered under warranty ( i f known ) $ 

### 0

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvi ous. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Re gulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS UNAUDITED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-05-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-02-2000
<CASH>                                          29,750
<SECURITIES>                                     5,340
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,430
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,783
<INVENTORY>                                    103,844
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               259,773
<PP&E>                                         139,017
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 355,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,913
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,312
<OTHER-SE>                                     247,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   355,712
<SALES>                                        290,601
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               295,761
<CGS>                                          170,545
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,971
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,465
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,506
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,506
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.51<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT REPORTED IS ACTUALLY "EPS-PRIMARY".
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

United States of America

v.

(1) Cyril Laurence Lartigue

NO: AU:20-M -00501(1)

WITNESS LIST for PRELIMINARY / DETENTION HEARING held on June 18, 2020

BY GOVERNMENT BY DEFENDANT

1. Reynaldo Alatorre, Jr., ATF 1. 

2. 2. 

3. 3.

4. 4. 

5. 5. 

6. 6. 

7. 7. 

8. 8. 

9. 9. 

10. 10. 

11. 11. 

12. 12. 

13. 13. 

14. 14. 

15. 15. 

16. 16. 

17. 17. 

18. 18. 

Case 1:20-mj-00501-AWA Document 18 Filed 06/18/20 Page 1 of 1
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. 

AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00507-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF ERRATA REGARDING NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC’S

[81] RESPONSIVE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF AND EXHIBITS

Neonode is filing this Notice of Errata to correct two things in the filings made last Friday, 

May 19, 2023. First, the Declaration of Craig Rosenberg [Dkt. 81-1] was submitted in support of 

Plaintiff’s [Dkt. 81] Responsive Claim Construction Brief. His resume was referenced as 

Appendix A in the Rosenberg Declaration but unintentionally omitted. Second, Neonode is 

providing a replacement Exhibit 5 [Dkt. 81-7], which includes page numbers on the bottom righthand corner of the document that correspond with the citations within its Brief [Dkt. 81] and the 

Declaration of Dr. Rosenberg [Dkt. 81-1]. Both documents are attached. 

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 83 Filed 05/23/23 Page 1 of 3
2

Dated: May 23, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Philip J. Graves

Philip J. Graves (Pro Hac Vice)

CA State Bar No. 153441

Greer N. Shaw (Pro Hac Vice)

CA State Bar No. 197960

GRAVES & SHAW LLP

355 S. Grand Ave., Suite 2450

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: (213) 204-5101

Email: pgraves@gravesshaw.com

Email: gshaw@gravesshaw.com 

Brian D. Melton, Attorney-in-charge

(TX Bar #24010620)

Kalpana Srinivasan (CA Bar # 237460)

Rocco Magni (TX Bar # 24092745)

Bryce T. Barcelo (TX Bar # 24092081)

SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.

1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100

Houston, Texas 77002-5096

Telephone: (713) 651-9366

Facsimile: (713) 654-6666

bmelton@susmangodfrey.com

ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com

rmagni@susmangodfrey.com

bbarcelo@susmangodfrey.com

Craig D. Cherry (TX Bar No. 24012419)

ccherry@cjsjlaw.com 

Mark D. Siegmund (TX Bar No. 24117055)

msiegmund@ cjsjlaw.com

CHERRY JOHNSON SIEGMUND 

JAMES, PLLC

400 Austin Ave., 9th Floor

Waco, Texas 76701

Telephone: (254) 732-2242

Facsimile: (866) 627-3509

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF NEONODE 

SMARTPHONE LLC

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 83 Filed 05/23/23 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered electronically 

via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, on this 23rd

day of May, 2023.

\s\ Philip Graves

Philip Graves

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 83 Filed 05/23/23 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL 

INC., EMC CORPORATION,

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00473-ADA

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL

OF ATTORNEY BRIAN BARNES

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Withdrawal of Attorney 

Brian Barnes (“Defendants’ Motion”). This Court having considered Defendants’ Motion and 

noting it is unopposed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion be GRANTED. 

It is therefore ORDERED that Brian Barnes is permitted to withdraw as counsel of record 

for Defendants in this case. ECF notifications to Brian Barnes are to be terminated in this case.

SIGNED this ________ day of ____________________, 2021

HONORABLE ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 70-1 Filed 02/05/21 Page 1 of 1