alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5343 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5343

    To suspend temporarily the duty on dimethyl hydrogen phosphite.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Cassidy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on dimethyl hydrogen phosphite.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIMETHYL HYDROGEN PHOSPHITE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Dimethyl hydrogen   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          phosphite (CAS                                                    12/31/2015
                          No. 868-85-9)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2920.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clarence Graham, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Supreme Court for resentencing, in accordance with the following memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and indulging in all reasonable inferences in the People’s favor *(People v Ford,*66 NY2d 428, 437), we conclude that the proof was legally sufficient to support defendant’s conviction for rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree *(see, People v Thompson,*72 NY2d 410; *People v Coleman,*42 NY2d 500, 505). The principal issue at trial was whether defendant acted with forcible compulsion, and the court, as fact finder, resolved credibility questions in favor of the prosecution. We have exercised our independent factual review power and perceive no reason to disturb the verdict *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495).

Defendant failed to preserve his contentions that the court erred in admitting testimony concerning his prior assaultive conduct towards the victim and in permitting the victim to *867testify that she had made a prompt complaint *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Dawson,*50 NY2d 311, 324). Those contentions, in any event, are without merit *(see, Boecio v People,*41 NY 265; *People v Velasquez,*141 AD2d 882, 883, *lv denied*72 NY2d 926).

Defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to an indeterminate term of 7 to 14 years for rape in the first degree and a concurrent indeterminate term of 1 to 3 years for sexual abuse in the first degree. The sentence imposed on the rape charge was not harsh or excessive, and we decline to modify that portion of the sentence. The sentence imposed for sexual abuse, however, was unlawful. Sexual abuse in the first degree is a class D violent felony (Penal Law § 70.02 [1] [c]), and the mandatory minimum indeterminate term of imprisonment that could be imposed upon a second felony offender was 2 to 4 years. Under the circumstances, we vacate the sentence imposed on the conviction for sexual abuse in the first degree and remit this matter for resentencing on that conviction. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Doyle, J.—rape, first degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

l1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

138209(44) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138209 

 COA: 280127 

Macomb CC: 07-001571-FC 

KIP C. SCHMIDT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 12, 2009 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

 KELLY, C.J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant 

leave to appeal.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

d1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

138488(55)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138488 COA: 280984 Jackson CC: 07-003583-FC DAVID DEWAYNE ALDRIDGE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s June 23, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
Exhibit 23.1

























CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS







We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries for the period ended September 26, 2004, as indicated in our report dated October 19, 2004; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.



We are aware that our report referred to above, is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements File No.'s 333-02683, 333-05231, 333-15851, 333-43055, 333-51189, 333-51181, 333-57779, 333-84483 and 333-86492.



We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.









/S/ BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP



BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP









Dayton, Ohio

October 25, 2004
Exhibit 21.1
 List of subsidiaries of the Registrant
 Subsidiary
    
    JurisdictionCavium Networks International, Inc.
    
    DelawareCavium International
    
    CaymanCavium Networks International
    
    CaymanCavium Networks (India) Private Limited
    
    IndiaCavium Networks Asia
    
    CaymanCavium Networks U.K. Limited
    
    EnglandCavium LLC
    
    CaliforniaCavium (Taiwan) Ltd.
    
    TaiwanCavium Semiconductor Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaCavium Networks Singapore PTE. LTD.
    
    SingaporeWWC I, LLC
    
    DelawareW&W Communications, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaBeijing WWCOMS Info Technology Ltd.
    
    China
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 198 (Thursday, October 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26167]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Department of Defense Wage Committee; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed 
meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on 
November 7, 2000; November 14, 2000; November 21, 2000; and November 
28, 2000, at 10 a.m. in Room A105, The Nash Building, 1400 Key 
Boulevard, Rosslyn, Virginia.
    Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the 
Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the 
criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be 
considered are related to internal rules and practices of the 
Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were 
obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that 
the data will be held in confidence.
    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to 
submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed 
to be deserving of the Committee's attention.
    Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by 
writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

    Dated: October 5, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-26167 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 15325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06043]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technical Advisory Committee (HTAC): 
Correction

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting: correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal 
Register on March 5, 2014, a notice of an open meeting for the Hydrogen 
and Fuel Cell Technical Advisory Committee (HTAC). The notice is being 
corrected to change the address of the meeting.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of March 5, 2014, in FR DOC. 2014-04834, on 
page 12501, please make the following corrections:
    In the ADDRESSES heading, second column, first paragraph, first 
line, please remove, ``U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence 
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, Room 6A-112 and in its place add 
``The Radisson Hotel--Reagan National Airport, 2020 Jefferson-Davis 
Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202''.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 13, 2014.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-06043 Filed 3-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5541 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5541

 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Rubberized textile fabrics 
              of cotton, other than those of heading 5902.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

Mr. Young of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Rubberized textile fabrics 
              of cotton, other than those of heading 5902.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RUBBERIZED TEXTILE FABRICS OF COTTON, OTHER THAN THOSE OF 
              HEADING 5902.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Rubberized textile  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          fabrics of                                                        12/31/2015
                          cotton, other
                          than those of
                          heading 5902
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          5906.99.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 566 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 566

            To close the National Drug Intelligence Center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2011

Mrs. Bono Mack introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Armed 
Services and Select Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To close the National Drug Intelligence Center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
any other provision of law, the Attorney General or the Secretary of 
Defense may not obligate funds for the National Drug Intelligence 
Center (NDIC) located in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, except for those 
activities related to the permanent closing of the NDIC and to the 
relocation of activities performed at NDIC determined to be necessary 
by the Attorney General, in consultation with the appropriate Federal 
agencies.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 14

- 14

- 00792

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AT HOUSTON, TEXAS

_________________________________________________________________ _

KHALED ALATTAR

, Appellant,

v.

KAY HOLDINGS, INC.

, Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Interlocutory Appeal of Ruling on Special Appearance

From t he 113 th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 54501

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Please take notice that effective Thursday June 25 , 2015, the suite number for

Brian M. Keller, State Bar No. 00784376, has changed and he r equests that service of

notices and all other documents be made upon him at:

K ELLER & A SSOCIATES

, P.C.

2500 West Loop South, Suite 308

Houston, TX 77027

281.853.9456 P hone

713.600.5804 F acsimile

bkeller@kellerattorneys.com ACCEPTED

14-14-00792-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

6/26/2015 8:52:13 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK2 Respectfully submitted,

K ELLER & A SSOCIATES

, P.C.

By: /s/ Brian M. Keller

Brian M. Keller

State Bar No. 00784376

2500 West Loop South, Suite 300

Houston, TX 77027

281.853.9456 P hone

713.600.5804 F acsimile

bkeller@ke llerattorneys.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVI CE

A copy of Appell ant’s Amended Brief was served electronically on counsel

of record on June 26 , 2015 , as follows:

J. Randle Henderson

16506 FM 529, Suite 115

- 107

Houston, Texas 77095

jrh@hendersonrandy.com

/s/ Brian M. Keller

B rian M. Keller
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5540 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5540

            To suspend temporarily the duty on pile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

Mr. Young of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on pile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PILE FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Pile fabrics,       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          including `long                                                   12/31/2015
                          pile' fabrics and
                          terry fabrics,
                          knitted or
                          crocheted: `Long
                          pile' fabrics: Of
                          man-made fibers
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          6001.22.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00459

- CR
Andrey Cardiel Martinez

v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 1445

- 16

- I

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause
remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinio n

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 27 , 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2018

In re: RAYMOND C. MARSHALL,

Petitioner.

No. 19-2118

In re: RAYMOND C. MARSHALL,

Petitioner.

On Petitions for Writs of Mandamus. (5:18-hc-02156-FL)

Submitted: April 1, 2020 Decided: April 14, 2020

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond C. Marshall, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond C. Marshall petitions for writs of mandamus seeking an order vacating 

the transfer of his 28 U.S.C § 2254 (2018) petition, liberally construing the § 2254 petition

as a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion, and reducing his sentence to time served. We conclude 

that Marshall is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court, 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re MurphyBrown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only 

when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795. 

Here, the Eastern District of North Carolina transferred Marshall’s petition to the Middle 

District of North Carolina in June 2018, see 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d) (2018), and the Middle 

District denied relief. Because Marshall’s § 2254 petition is no longer pending in either 

district court, the relief sought by Marshall is not available by way of mandamus. See In 

re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007) (recognizing that mandamus 

relief is not a substitute for appeal). 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the 

petitions for writs of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITIONS DENIED
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Storage Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 24, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Robert S. Kocol, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ ROBERT S. KOCOL 
Robert S. Kocol
Chief Financial Officer 
October 29, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6952
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus OLUMIDE OLADIPO HASSAN, a/k/a Alex R. Shoga, a/k/a Hassan A. Akintola, a/k/a Hassan Gallexy, a/k/a Gallexy, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, District Judge. (CR-93-186-A, CA-96-614-AM) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Olumide Oladipo Hassan, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard James Apperson, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hassan , Nos. CR-93-186-A; CA-96-614-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 30, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### WILSON et al. v. STATE.

No, 24341.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 13, 1949.

*460L. M. Kenyon' and Randolph Pierson, both of Galveston, for appellant.

■ Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellants were convicted of theft and sentenced to two years in the penitentiary.

The case was tried in the 10th Judicial District Court of Qalveston County at the term which, according to the caption, began on the 4th day of October and adjourned on the 30th day of November. On the 2nd day of November and during the term of court the appellants filed in the court appeal bonds approved by the sheriff and by the district judge. No recognizance appears in the record.

We are unable to consider this appeal because the provisions of Articles 816 and 818, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., have not been complied with. A recognizance and not an appeal bond is required during the term of court in order to give this court jurisdiction. See the foregoing articles of the Code of Criminal Procedure and annotations thereunder; also Gilmore v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 221, 109 S.W.2d 758.

The appeal is dismissed.