alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 470 (01/09) Order Scheduling a Detention Hearing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

United States of America

v.

(1) Cyril Laurence Lartigue

 Case Number: AU:20-M -00501(1)

 Defendant

ORDER SCHEDULING A DETENTION HEARING

 A X detention hearing and a X preliminary hearing in this case is/are scheduled as follows:

Place: 501 West 5th Street, Austin, Texas, 78701 Courtroom No.: 3, 4 Floor

Presiding Judge: Magistrate Judge Andrew W. Ausitn Date and Time: June 12, 2020, at

10:00 AM

IT IS ORDERED: Pending the hearing, the defendant is to be detained in the custody of the

United States Marshal or any other authorized officer. The custodian must bring the defendant to the

hearing at the time, date, and place set forth above.

 If defendant chooses to waive hearing, a written waiver (see attached) must be signed by

defendant and his/her counsel and filed by 4:00 p.m. the day before scheduled hearing.

June 10, 2020 ______________________________

Date ANDREW W. AUSTIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-mj-00501-AWA Document 6 Filed 06/10/20 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

United States of America

v.

(1) Cyril Laurence Lartigue

Case Number: AU:20-M -00501(1)

 Defendant

DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF DETENTION HEARING

 Defendant, (1) Cyril Laurence Lartigue, files this response to the Notice of Detention

Hearing which was issued by the Court. After further investigation, Defendant wishes at this

time to waive his/her right to the detention hearing, subject to his/her right to bring a motion

concerning detention at a later date.

Respectfully submitted,

Defendant

Date Attorney for Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was hand 

delivered to the Assistant United States Attorney on the day of , 20 .

Attorney for Defendant

Case 1:20-mj-00501-AWA Document 6 Filed 06/10/20 Page 2 of 3
AO 468 (Rev. 01/09) Waiver of a Preliminary Hearing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

United States of America

v.

(1) Cyril Laurence Lartigue

NO: AU:20-M -00501(1)

WAIVER OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING

 I understand that I have been charged with an offense in a criminal complaint filed in this court,

or charged with violating the terms of probation or supervised release in a petition filed in this court. A

magistrate judge has informed me of my right to a preliminary hearing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 5, or to a

preliminary hearing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1.

 I agree to waive my right to a preliminary hearing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 5 or Fed. R. Crim. P.

32.1.

Date:

Defendant's signature

Signature of defendant's attorney

Case 1:20-mj-00501-AWA Document 6 Filed 06/10/20 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-3-000]

                    Take notice that on October 2, 2000, Dominion Transmission, Inc. (DTI) tendered for filing a notice of termination of service of uncertificated gathering lines in North Mahoning Township, Indiana County, Pennsylvania. The proposed effective date of the termination is November 1, 2000.                          ( print page 60418)    

DTI states that the lines for which termination of service is being requested are being sold to Dominion E & P. The date will also be the effective date of the abandonment by sale to Dominion E & P. DTI states that the lines being abandoned are listed in Exhibit A attached to the filing.

DTI states that copies of the filing have been sent to the affected producers, which are listed on Exhibit A. DTI also states that copies of the filing are being mailed to DTI's customers and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before October 12, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26053  Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 23

- 00013

- CR

Jeffrey Wayne NEWMAN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 13

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 658978

Honorable Rosie S. Gonzalez , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED. Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

SIGNED April 10, 2024.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44137

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

SARA M. KUIPER

- BOLES

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 786

Filed: November 22, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho,
Canyon County. Hon. Davis F. Vandervelde , District Judge.

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy , Deputy
Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney Gen eral; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Sara M. Kuiper

- Boles pled guilty to injury to a c hild . Idaho Code § 18

- 1501(1) . The

district court sentenced Kuiper

- Boles to a unified term of ten years with four years determinate

.
Kuiper

- Boles filed an untimely Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court denied.

Kuiper

- Boles appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by denying her

Rule 35 motion.

An I.C.R. 35 motion must be filed within 120 days of the entry of the judgment.

I.C.R. 35(b). The 120

- day filing limit is jurisdictional and deprives the district court of authority

to entertain an untimely motion. State v. Fox , 122 Idaho 550, 552, 835 P.2d 1361, 1363 (Ct.2

App. 1992). Kuiper

- Boles ’ Rule 35 motion was not timely filed . Therefore, the district court’s

order denying Kuiper

- Boles ’ Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00454-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00455-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00456-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00457-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00458-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00459-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00460-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00461-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00462-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00463-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00464-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00465-ADA

WSOU’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF FINAL 

INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s Version 3.2 of the Court’s Order Governing proceedings entered 

November 5, 2020, and in accordance with the Court’s Scheduling Order, Plaintiff hereby notifies 

the Court Plaintiff has disclosed its final infringement contentions on Defendant Microsoft 

Corporation via electronic mail on April 30, 2020. 

Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 72 Filed 05/03/21 Page 1 of 2
Date: May 3, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Mark D. Siegmund_____ 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered 

electronically via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, 

on this the 3rd day of May 2021.

/s/ Mark D. Siegmund

Mark D. Siegmund

Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 72 Filed 05/03/21 Page 2 of 2
1N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTiN DIVISION 20 J 30 ? 2: t8 

JASON LEE VAN DYKE, § 

PLAiNTIFF, § 

§ CAUSENO. 1:20-MC-657-LY 

V. § (CASE NO. 4:1 8-CV-24-ALM, 

§ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

THOMAS CHRISTOPHER RETZLAFF § FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF 

AIKIA DEAN ANDERSON D/B/A § TEXAS, SHERMAN DIVISION) 

BV FILES, VIA VIEW FILES L.L.C., § 

AND VIAVIEW FILES, § 

DEFENDANTS. § 

S) 1I) * 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all pending and future discovery motions as well as all 

other nondispositive motions in this case are REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Mark 

Lane for resolution pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and 

Rule 1(c) of Appendix C of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Texas, as amended. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending and future dispositive motions are 

REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Mark Lane for Report and Recommendation 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Rule 1(d) of 

Appendix C of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, 

as amended. 

SIGNED this day of June, 2020. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

Case 1:20-mc-00657-LY-ML Document 20 Filed 06/30/20 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE OF ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-12-00984-CV

Style: Walter L. Boyaki, Ruben P. Hernandez & Miranda & Boyaki

v John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC d/b/a The O'Quinn Law Firm, and Musslewhite & 

Associates, P.C.

Date motion filed*: January 25, 2013

Type of motion: Extension of time to file Clerk’s Record

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Clerk’s Record

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: November 26, 2012

Number of previous extensions granted: -0- 

Date Requested: Until February 28, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: February 28, 2013

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack



Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: February 21, 2013
#### SIMS v. STATE.

No. 25690.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 6, 1952.

On Rehearing March 26, 1952.

Bennett & Bennett, by Mac L. Bennett, Jr., Normangee, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor and was assessed a fine of $300 from which he appeals.

The evidence in the case sustains the jury’s verdict. There are two bills of exception, neither of which raises a question of law of sufficient importance to require discussion. They have been considered and are overruled.

Finding no reversible error the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Our attention is directed to the fact that there is no evidence to be found in the statement of facts establishing the dry status of Leon County.

The state offered in evidence certain pages of the minutes of the district court which the clerk identified as containing the judgment in the election contest adjudging the sale of intoxicating liquor in Leon County to be unlawful, and the objection offered by appellant was overruled. The record is silent as to whether the judgment was then read or admitted as an exhibit, and the statement of facts does not show such judgment.

In the absence of proof of the dry status of Leon County in the record, the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted, the order of affirmance is set aside, and the judgment is now reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the court.
Exhibit 15

November 7, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, Northwest
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attn:  Document Control


Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated October 23, 2003, on our
review of the interim condensed consolidated financial
information of 7-Eleven, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
"Company") as of September 30, 2003, and for the three-month
and nine-month periods then ended, and included in the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then
ended, is incorporated by reference in the following
Registration Statements:


                                             Registration No.
                                             ----------------
  On Form S-8 for:

    7-Eleven, Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan        33-63617
                                              and 333-107574

    7-Eleven, Inc. Supplemental Executive
      Retirement Plan for Eligible Employees       333-42731

 7-Eleven, Inc. Stock Compensation Plan
   for Non-Employee Directors                  333-68491


Very truly yours,


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Dallas, Texas





                               Tab 1
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research.

The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commrcial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research.                    

*Date:*                         February 28-29, 2000.                    

*Open:*                         February 28, 2000, 8:30 AM to 3:00 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         Discussion of matters of program relevance.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Conference Rooms E1 & E2, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Closed:*                         February 28, 2000, 3:00 PM to Adjournment on Tuesday, February 29, 2000.                    

*Agenda:*                         to review and evaluate grant applications and/or proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Conference Rooms E1&E2, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Elke Jordan, Deputy Director, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, PHS,                         Start Printed Page 5876                        DHHS, 31 Center Drive, Building 31, Room 4B09, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301 496-0844.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 28, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-2626 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 12





                  SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


                        Computation of Ratios of Earnings
                   from Continuing Operations to Fixed Charges
                              Total Enterprise (a)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                        Three Months Ended March 31,                        Years Ended December 31,


                                            1997           1996            1996        1995         1994         1993        1992
                                            ----           ----            ----        ----         ----         ----        ----

                                                                                               (In Thousands)

Earnings from Continuing Operations:
<S>                                        <C>            <C>            <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>     
   Income (loss) before income taxes       $46,638        $41,897        $150,219    $134,124     $ 76,098     $127,617    $126,691
   Fixed charges (see computation below)     8,375         12,401          43,028      48,779       47,575       58,249      47,995
                                           -------        -------        --------    --------     --------     --------    --------
Total Earnings Available for Fixed Charges $55,013        $54,298        $193,247    $182,903     $123,673     $185,866    $174,686
                                           =======        =======        ========    ========     ========     ========    ========


Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense before deducting
      interest capitalized                 $ 8,019        $11,920        $ 41,147    $ 46,859     $ 45,900     $ 56,599    $ 46,298
   Rentals(b)                                  356            481           1,881       1,920        1,675        1,650       1,697
                                           -------        -------        --------    --------     --------     --------    --------
                                           $ 8,375        $12,401        $ 43,028    $ 48,779     $ 47,575     $ 58,249    $ 47,995
                                           =======        =======        ========    ========     ========     ========    ========


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges             6.6            4.4             4.5         3.7          2.6          3.2         3.6
                                           =======        =======        ========    ========     ========     ========    ========
</TABLE>




----------------

(a)  Amounts  include the  Company's  portion of the  captions as they relate to
     persons accounted for by the equity method.

(b)  These  amounts  represent  1/3 of rentals  which  approximate  the interest
     factor  applicable to such rentals of the Company and its  subsidiaries and
     continuing unconsolidated affiliates.
Exhibit 99.2


                                 CERTIFICATION

     I, Andres E. Serrano, Vice President of The Bank of New York, acting as
trustee under the trust agreement described below, hereby certify that
pursuant to the Core Investment Grade Bond Trust I Trust Agreement, dated as
of November 20, 2002, among Core Bond Products LLC, as Depositor, The Bank of
New York, as Trustee and Securities Intermediary (the "Trustee") and Banc of
America Securities LLC, as Administrative Agent (the "Trust Agreement"), the
Trustee has complied with all servicing obligations and all distribution
obligations pursuant to the Trust Agreement for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2003.


                                        /s/ Andres E. Serrano
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Andres E. Serrano
                                       Title: Vice President
                                       Date:  March 15, 2004
#### Ex parte KING.

No. 26520.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 24, 1953.

H. E. Tarpley, Dallas, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

Relator, an inmate of the Texas. Prison System, again seeks his discharge, alleging a faulty cumulation in Cause No. 7810 in the District Court of Bowie County.

Upon his former application we declined to pass upon the question, because relator was under sentence from Wichita County. Ex parte King, Tex.Cr.App., 240 S.W.2d 777.

The authorities of the Prison System have now made it known to this Court that relator has at this time satisfied the sentence in Cause No. 8582 from Wichita County and that if we hold the Bowie County cu-mulation ineffectual the relator is entitled to be discharged.

The provision for cumulation in the Bowie County case reads as follows: “It is *the further*by the court that sentence in this cause shall not begin to run until all other sentences against this defendant in the State of Texas shall have expired.”

This is insufficient to effect cumulation. Ex parte Stewart, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 479, 236 S.W.2d 799.

The relief prayed for is now granted, and the relator is ordered discharged.
30 Wall Street, 8th Floor New York, NY 10005-2205

www.torekeland.com

Tor Ekeland

Managing Partner

(718) 737-7264

tor@torekeland.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SAN ANTONIO 

Attention: Clerk of the Court

U.S.D.C. Western District of Texas San Antonio Division

Clerk of the Court 

655 East César E. Chávez Blvd, Room G65

San Antonio, TX 78206

August 28, 2020

RE: Melody Joy Cantu and Dr. Rodrigo Cantu v. Dr. Sandra Guerra and Digital 

Forensics Corporation, 5:20-CV-0746 (JKP)

In the matter of Melody Joy Cantu and Dr. Rodrigo Cantu v. Dr. Sandra Guerra and 

Digital Forensics Corporation, 5:20-CV-0746 (JKP). Plaintiffs’ counsel had a change of

address, and therefore, are re-filing the Summons with the new address.

The original Summons was filed on July 15, 2020, Dkt. 4 and then issued by the 

court on July 16, 2020, Dkt. 5.

In addition, Defendant Digital Forensics Corporation is registered with the 

Secretary of State in Ohio under multiple fictious names with several registered agents, all 

of which are added to the Summons. 

Sincerely,

Tor Ekeland

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 8-1 Filed 08/28/20 Page 1 of 1