alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, David W. Hockenbrocht, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sparton Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.          Date: February 14, 2007 /s/ DAVID W. HOCKENBROCHT         David W. Hockenbrocht, Chief Executive Officer  
**31**
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                        STERLING BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED                  SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                JUNE 30,                            JUNE 30,
                                      -----------------------------       -----------------------------
                                          2002              2001              2002              2001
                                      -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------
<S>                                   <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
NET INCOME                            $ 5,230,609       $ 4,705,227       $10,496,910       $ 9,241,512
LESS: PREFERRED DIVIDENDS                  28,178            24,461            56,554            49,244
                                      -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------
NET INCOME AVAILABLE FOR COMMON
  SHAREHOLDERS AND ADJUSTED FOR
  DILUTED COMPUTATION                 $ 5,202,431       $ 4,680,766       $10,440,356       $ 9,192,268
                                      ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========


WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON
  SHARES OUTSTANDING                   10,038,682        10,103,651        10,070,931        10,068,938
ADD DILUTIVE EFFECT OF:
    STOCK OPTIONS                         473,517           381,045           457,419           252,176
    CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK           233,429           236,646           233,887           237,174
                                      -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------
ADJUSTED FOR ASSUMED DILUTED
    COMPUTATION                        10,745,628        10,721,342        10,762,237        10,558,288
                                      ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========



BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE              $      0.52       $      0.46       $      1.04       $      0.91
                                      ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE            $      0.48       $      0.44       $      0.97       $      0.87
                                      ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========
</TABLE>

                                      49
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-21129

Conference Calendar

 

LAWRENCE STEPHEN MAXWELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CV-623

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lawrence Stephen Maxwell appeals from the district court’s

dismissal of his petition to quash four administrative thirdparty summonses issued by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 

Maxwell argues that the district court erred by refusing to quash

the summonses because the summonses were issued outside the

territorial jurisdiction of the United States, Acts Of Congress

are not applicable to the independent State of Texas, he was not

subject to the administrative authority of the United States
No. 96-21129

-2-

Federal Corporation, the summonses were issued in violation of

the regulations promulgated under the Administrative Procedures

Act, and the United States did not have the authority to

prosecute him for activities investigated by the IRS. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5632 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5632

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rolling travel bags without 
                    a removable backpack or daypack.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

  Mr. Polis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rolling travel bags without 
                    a removable backpack or daypack.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ROLLING TRAVEL BAGS WITHOUT A REMOVABLE BACKPACK OR 
              DAYPACK.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Travel bags of      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          manmade fibers,                                                   12/31/2015
                          with wheels, a
                          telescoping
                          handle and
                          stowable shoulder
                          straps, without a
                          removable
                          separate backpack
                          or daypack
                          attached by
                          zipper or other
                          means, valued
                          over $30, and not
                          to exceed 85
                          liters in volume
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          4202.12.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25912]



[[Page 60207]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-920-1310-01; WYW111766]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

September 27, 2000.
    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
lease WYW111766 for lands in Converse County, Wyoming, was timely filed 
and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date 
of termination.
    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 
16\2/3\ percent, respectively.
    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 
to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of 
the lease as set out in section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management 
is proposing to reinstate lease WYW111766 effective January 1, 2000, 
subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the 
increased rental and royalty rates cited above.

Mavis Love,
Acting Chief, Leasable Minerals Section.
[FR Doc. 00-25912 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald W. Thiessen, Chief Executive Officer of Amarc
Resources Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 (the Annual Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  | September 30, 2009     
|------ | -----------------------
|       |                        
|       | /s/ Ronald W. Thiessen 
|       |                        
|By:    | Ronald W. Thiessen     
|Title: | Chief Executive Officer

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
### NUMBERS 13
- 10
- 00 394
- CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF R.E.S., III, J.D.S. AND A.E.S., CHILDREN

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36 th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides , and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, R.S. 1 , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 36t h District
Court of San Patricio County, Texas, in cause number S

- 09

- 5052

- FL

- A. On June 15, 2010, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on March 5, 2010 , and that the deputy district clerk, Ernestina Roblez , had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the

1 In appeals from cases involving the termination of parental rights, the rules of appellate procedure require the use of an alias to refer to a minor, A and if necessary to protect the minor = s identity, to the minor = s parent or other family member. ” Tex. R. App. P. 9.8.2

clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not correcte d within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant failed to respond to the Court = s notices. The Court, having considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal s hould be dismissed for want of prosecution

. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUT ION . Any pending
motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 24 th day of August, 20 10

.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5068 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5068

      To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-ethylhexyl salicylate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Frelinghuysen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-ethylhexyl salicylate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        2-ethylhexyl        Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          salicylate, (CAS                                                  12/31/2015
                          No. 118-60-5)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2918.23.53)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 10610 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

FELIX GUTIERREZ

- MARTINEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14

- CR

- 381

- 1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Felix Gutierrez

- Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gutierrez

- Martinez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 29, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-10610 Document: 00513777224 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2016No. 15

- 10610

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leav e to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-10610 Document: 00513777224 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/29/2016
APPEAL NO. ___________

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

IN RE EMMANUEL ARMENDARIZ, PETITIONER

Appeal from Eighth Court of Appeals, No. 08-13-00125-CR

Appeal from the 409th District Court of El Paso County, Texas (TC#20100D06116)

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO

FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

To the Honorable Justices of Said Court:

Now comes Emmanuel Armendariz, Appellant in the above styled and 

numbered cause, and moves for an extension of time of 30 days to file a petition 

for discretionary review, and for good cause shows the following:

1. On May 8, 2015, the Court of Appeals affirmed appellant's 

conviction. Emmanuel Armendariz v. State, 08-13-00125-CR. This petition is 

therefore due on June 8, 2015.

2. Counsels will be unable to complete the petition for the following 

reasons: Petitioner's attorneys will not be able to complete the Petition for 

Discretionary Review by the due date because of the 1) complexity of the legal 

issues requiring extensive research and writing; 2) counsels' responsibilities on 

other urgent client matters, and 3) Petitioner's counsels have complex briefs due 

before the Eighth Court of Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court due in June and 

PD-0646-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 5/28/2015 2:43:28 PM

Accepted 5/28/2015 4:47:04 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
July, that require extensive research and drafting.

3. Defendant is currently free on bond.

Wherefore, Premises Considered, Petitioner respectfully requests an 

extension of 30 days, i.e. until July 9, 2015, to file a petition for discretionary 

review.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Eduardo N. Lerma, Sr.

Eduardo N. Lerma, Sr. 

SBOT 13331200

enl1417@aol.com

Law Offices of Eduardo N. Lerma, Sr.

1417 Montana Avenue

El Paso, Texas 79902-5617

T / 915.533.0177

F / 915.533.7236

By: /s/ Veronica Teresa Lerma

Veronica Teresa Lerma

SBOT 24062846

vtlerma@gmail.com

Lerma Law 

1417 Montana Avenue

El Paso, Texas 79902-5617

T / 915.533.4779

F / 915.533.7236

Attorneys for Emmanuel Armendariz
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned counsel certifies that this pleading was served by electronic 

service on opposing party: Tom Darnold, Appellate lead attorney for the District 

Attorney's Office, El Paso County, 500 East San Antonio St., Room 201, El Paso, 

Texas 79901, at t.darnold@epcounty.com and the State Prosecuting Attorney at 

information@spa.texas.gov.

By: /s/ Eduardo N. Lerma, Sr.

Eduardo N. Lerma, Sr. 

SBOT 13331200

enl1417@aol.com

By: /s/ Veronica Teresa Lerma

Veronica Teresa Lerma

SBOT 24062846

vtlerma@gmail.com

Attorneys for Emmanuel Armendariz
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

On May 28, 2015, the undersigned attorney conferred with Respondent’s 

counsel by telephonic communication, Tom Darnold, who does not oppose this 

extension.

By: /s/ Eduardo N. Lerma, Sr.

Eduardo N. Lerma, Sr. 

SBOT 13331200

enl1417@aol.com

By: /s/ Veronica Teresa Lerma

Veronica Teresa Lerma

SBOT 24062846

vtlerma@gmail.com

Attorneys for Emmanuel Armendariz
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Lucy Woods, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Viatel Holding (Bermuda)
Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the company and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the company's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date:  June 30, 2005

/s/ Lucy Woods
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer