alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTORS, Inc., v. SHEARER.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 23, 1952.

Funk, Chancellor & Marshall, Frankfort, for appellant.

Gilbert Burnett, Frank W. Burke, Louisville, for appellee.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

The appellant, Beverage Distributors, Incorporated, filed this declaratory judgment action seeking to have the court determine whether it may legally sell and distribute in Kentucky a product labeled “Apple Vat 36” without complying with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, KRS, Ch. 241, or the Local Option Law, KRS, Ch. 242. The circuit court’s judgment declared “Apple Vat 36” to be an alcoholic hard cider, subject to and within the purview of these laws.

Appellant argues for reversal that “Apple Vat 36” is not a preserved hard cider, but is a preserved sweet cider which is specifically excluded from regulation as an alcoholic beverage by subsection (f) of KRS 242.010.

KRS 242.010 provides:

> “(1) ‘Alcoholic beverage’ means alcoholic brandy, whiskey, rum, gin, beer, ale, porter, wine and all other spirituous, vinous, malt or fermented liquors, liquids and compounds, whether medicated, proprietary, patented or not, and by whatever name called, containing more than one percent of alcohol by volume, which are fit for use for beverage purposes. It does not include :

> 

> “(f) Vinegar and preserved sweet cider; * *

We will not pursue appellant’s contention further as it is predicated upon the *154fallacious premise that the product in question is preserved sweet cider when in fact it is an alcoholic hard cider and an intoxicating beverage. The distiller represents on the label of the container that “Apple Vat 36” is a hard cider; that its alcoholic strength is not less than 3.2 nor more than 7 per cent by volume; and that its alcoholic content is “10-12 proof.” The exhibits filed by the chemist show that its alcoholic content is between 6 and 7 per cent by volume.

We will not permit the unregulated sale or distribution of this product, which we find is an intoxicating beverage, in violation of our laws governing same. KRS, Chapters 241, 242, 243 and 244. The judgment of the circuit court was correct.

Judgment affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the annual report of Merchandise Creations, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert B. Turner, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange

|   | Act of 1934; and |
|--------|------------------|

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition

|   | and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Robert B. Turner  

|   | Robert B. Turner |  
 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

March 29, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|--------|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 195 (Friday, October 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25717]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR Sec. 50.7, 38 FR 
19029, and 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), notice is hereby given that on September 
6, 2000, a proposed consent decree in United States v. Alcoa, Inc. et 
al., Civil Action No. 83-CV-1623 (N.D.N.Y.), was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The 
proposed consent decree resolves the claims of the United States 
against Alcoa, Inc. (``Alcoa'') and twenty-one other potentially 
responsible parties listed below (``collectively the Settling 
Parties'') at the York Oil Superfund Site located in Moira, New York 
(``Site''), under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. 
Pursuant to the proposed settlement, the Settling Parties shall 
reimburse the United States for certain past and future response costs; 
implement the remedial measures, including any contingent remedies, 
selected in the Record of Decision for the Second Operable Unit at the 
Site. The consent decree includes a covenant not to sue by the United 
States under Sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, 
and under section 7003 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 
(``RCRA''), 42 U.S.C. 6973. The total value of the settlement is 
estimated at approximately $4.4-7.5 million, depending upon whether the 
contingent remedy is implemented at the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, 
DC 20044, and should refer to United States v. Alcoa, Civil Action No. 
83-CV-1623 (N.D.N.Y.), D.J. Ref. 90-5-2-1-585/1. Commenters may request 
an opportunity for a public meeting in the affected area, in accordance 
with Section 7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6973(d).
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at EPA Region II, 
Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, 
New York 10007-1866. A copy of the consent decree may also be obtained 
in person or by mail (without attachments) from the Department of 
Justice Consent Decree Library, 13th floor, 1425 New York Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20005. In requesting a copy of the consent decree 
(without attachments), please enclose a check in the amount of $27.00 
(25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree 
Library.

Bruce Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-25717 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATIONS





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Standard Microsystems Corporation (the Company), does
hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2008 of the
Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
                  /s/ Christine
      King(signature)Christine
      KingPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive
      Officer)




By:
                    /s/ Joseph
      S. Durko(signature)Vice
      President, Corporate Controller andChief Accounting
      Officer(Principal Financial Officer)





Dated:
January 8, 2009
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 1, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00800

- CV

Tina Carloni , Appellant

v.

Jeffrey Shields , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA , AN D KELLY

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’ S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the final judgment sign ed by the tr i a l court on August 29, 202 3. Appellant

has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion , the Court agrees that

the motion should be granted . Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismiss es the app eal

.

Becau se appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
ex_283426.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


 


	
			

				
			1609 W VALLEY BLVD STE 338 ALHAMBRA CA 91803 USA


			TEL.1-888-988-1333 FAX.1-626-576-1582 WWW.AAGHUS.COM

			



 


 


Supplemental Agreement


 


Party A: AMERICA GREAT HEALTH (CA)


Add: 1609 W Valley Blvd. STE 338, Alhambra, CA 91803 


Chairman of the Board: Mike Qingkun Wang


EIN#: 32-0522173


E-mail: mike@aaghus.com


 


Party B: WANG'S PROPERTY INVESTMENT & MANAGEMENT LLC


Add: 527 5thStreet Peru IL 61354 


President: Da Wang


EIN#: 45-1988266


E-mail: dawang03@yahoo.com


 


 


After negotiation between both parties, the following agreement was reached, which is a supplementary agreement to the Assets Acquisition Agreement signed by America Great Health CA and Wang's Property Investment & Management LLC on September 3, 2021.


 


1.    Party A purchases 19 properties that include 53 units under Party B's name at a price of 7 million U.S. dollars.


 


2.    Party A does not purchase the equity of Party B. Due diligence on assets, liabilities, contingent liabilities, heavy contracts, litigation, arbitration, etc. will no longer be conducted.


 


3.    This supplementary agreement is in duplicate, with the same legal effect, and it will become effective after both parties sign it. This agreement contains both Chinese and English bilingual versions. If there is any difference in content, the English version shall be deemed legally binding.


 





1 of 2










 








 


 


	
			

				
			1609 W VALLEY BLVD STE 338 ALHAMBRA CA 91803 USA


			TEL.1-888-988-1333 FAX.1-626-576-1582 WWW.AAGHUS.COM

			



 


 


[The following is the signature content]


 


 


 


	
			Party A: America Great Health (CA)

				
			Party B: Wang’s Property Investment & Management LLC

			
	
			Sign: MIKE QINGKUN WANG

				
			Signatory: Da Wang

			



 


 


	
			Date: 09-09-2021

				
			Date: 09-09-2021

			



 


 





2 of 2
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5399 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Caramba Fungicide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Caramba Fungicide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CARAMBA FUNGICIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 5-amino-1-[2,6-dichloro-4- 

(trifluoromethyl) phenyl]- 

4-[(trifluoromethyl) sulfinyl]-1H-pyrazole-3- 

carbonitrile (Caramba 

Fungicide) (CAS No. 

125116–23–6) (provided 

for in subheading 

3808.92.50) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5399 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|No chart available.                                           
|No chart available.                                           
|                                                              
|                                                              
|New York Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. 

and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00507-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 

7.1 

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Neonode 

Smartphone LLC discloses the following: Aequitas Technologies LLC owns 10% or 

more of Plaintiff Neonode Smartphone LLC. 

DATED: October 23, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Philip J. Graves 

Philip J. Graves (CA State Bar No. 153441) 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

301 North Lake Avenue, Suite 920 

Pasadena, CA 91101 

Telephone: (213) 330-7147 

Facsimile: (213) 330-7152 

Email: philipg@hbsslaw.com

 

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 23 Filed 10/23/20 Page 1 of 3
2 

Greer N. Shaw (CA State Bar No. 197960) 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

301 North Lake Avenue, Suite 920 

Pasadena, CA 91101 

Telephone: (213) 330-7150 

Facsimile: (213) 330-7152 

Email: greers@hbsslaw.com 

Craig D. Cherry 

State Bar No. 24012419 

ccherry@haleyolson.com 

Justin W. Allen 

State Bar No. 24081977 

jallen@haleyolson.com 

HALEY & OLSON, P.C. 

100 N. Ritchie Road, Suite 200 

Waco, Texas 76712 

913 Franklin Ave., Suite 201 

Waco, Texas 76701 

Telephone: (254) 776-3336 

Facsimile: (254) 776-6823 

Counsel for Plaintiff Neonode Smartphone LLC 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 23 Filed 10/23/20 Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on the 23th day of October 2020, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification 

of such filing to the following: 

 /s/ Philip Graves 

 Philip Graves

John Michael Guaragna 

DLA Piper LLP 

401 Congress Suite 2500 

Austin, TX 78701 

(512) 457-7125 

Fax: 512/457-7001 

John.Guaragna@dlapiper.com 

Benjamin Mueller 

DLA Piper LLP 

444 West Lake Street, Suite 900 

Chicago, IL 60606 

(312) 368-4000 

Fax: (312) 236-7516 

Benjamin.Mueller@dlapiper.com

Mark D. Fowler 

Erik R. Fuehrer 

DLA Piper LLP 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 

(650) 833-2000 

Fax: (650) 833-2001 

Mark.Fowler@dlapiper.com 

Erik.Fuehrer@dlapiper.com 

Susan Acquista 

DLA Piper LLP 

401 B Street, Suite 1700 

San Diego , CA 92101 

(619) 699-2700 

Fax: (619) 699-2701 

Susan.Acquista@dlapiper.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 23 Filed 10/23/20 Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0183

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

ISAIAH JAMES PEHRINGER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 30, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 25 2024

07/25/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0183
State of California 

AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

EXECUTIVE ORDER R-10-004

Relating to the Rulemaking to Consider Amendments to the Current Regulations for 

Small Off-Road Engines 

WHEREAS, on November 20, 2008, the Air Resources Board (ARB or Board) 

conducted a public hearing to consider amendments to the current regulations for small 

off-road engines, as set forth in the Initial Statement of Reasons released to the public 

on October 3, 2008; 

WHEREAS, following the public hearing on November 20, 2008, the Board adopted 

Resolution 08-41 in which the Board approved sections 2403, 2405, 2406, 2408, and 

2409, title 13, California Code of Regulations as set forth in Attachment A-1 thereto, and 

the “California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2005 and Later 

Small Off-Road Engines” as set forth in Attachment A-2 thereto; 

WHEREAS, on September 8, 2009, ARB submitted the rulemaking package to the 

Office of Administrative Law (OAL) for review in accordance with the California 

Administrative Procedure Act (APA); 

WHEREAS, on October 27, 2009, the OAL issued a decision of disapproval for the 

regulatory action; 

WHEREAS, modifications to the approved regulations were made in order to correct the 

deficiencies specified in the Decision of Disapproval by the OAL; 

WHEREAS, the modifications were made available for a 15-day comment period 

starting February 4, 2010, in accordance with the provisions of section 44, 

title 1, CCR, with the modifications clearly indicated; and 

WHEREAS, two comments were received during the 15-day comment period and those 

comments have been considered by the Executive Officer. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the recitals and findings contained in 

Resolution 08-41 are incorporated by reference herein. 
Executive Order R-10-004 -2- 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that California Code of Regulations, title 13, sections 2403, 

2405, 2406, 2408, and 2409, and the incorporated “California Exhaust Emission 

Standards and Test Procedures for 2005 and Later Small Off-Road Engines,” are 

adopted as set forth in Attachments 1 and 2 hereto.

Executed this 24th day of February 2010, at Sacramento, California. 

 

 /s/ 

__________________________

James N. Goldstene 

Executive Officer 

Attachments
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cytation Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Fisher, Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/Richard Fisher                      Richard Fisher
Chairman and General Counsel
May 13, 2004
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Movie Star, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2006                            /s/ Melvyn Knigin
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Melvyn Knigin
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 13, 2006

                                                    /s/ Thomas Rende
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Thomas Rende
                                                    Chief Financial Officer and
                                                    Principal Accounting Officer
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

October 31, 2005

Before

Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Chief Judge,

Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 04-2959

MARIA DOLORES CUELLAR LOPEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

ALBERTO R.GONZALES, AttorneyGeneral

of the United States,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

No. A78-125-697

O R D E R

The Court, sua sponte, corrects its Opinion of October 26, 2005, to read as follows:

Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and BAUER and WOOD, Circuit Judges.

SO ORDERED.
Memorandum 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meetings 

From: John Bradfield 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

To: Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-6002, EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0603, and EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495 

This memorandum summarizes meetings held with stakeholders in the month of September, 2014 

On September 19, Associate Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air Joseph 

Goffman, Sector Policy, Programs Division Director Peter Tsirigotis and Associate Director Kevin Culligan 

Sector Policy, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director Sarah Dunham and Clean Air Markets Division 

Director Reid Harvey met with Tom Lawler of General Electric. EPA generally answered basic questions 

about the clean power plan proposal for existing sources. 

On September 23, Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan met with Janet 

Gellici of the National Coal Council. EPA generally answered basic questions about the clean power plan 

proposal for existing sources. 

On September 26, Clean Air Markets Division Director Reid Harvey and Sector Policy and Programs 

Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan met with Tomas Carbonell of the Environmental Defense Fund. 

EPA generally answered basic questions about the clean power plan proposal for existing sources. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper