alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Randgold Resources Limited(the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the yearended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Roger A. Williams, Finance Director of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

|  |           |                                                                                                                    |
|--|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (4)  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (5)  | The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Roger A. Williams Roger A. WilliamsFinance Director October 26,2005

----
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 19, 2015

NO. 03

- 15

- 00646

- CV

Chet Edward Cunningham, Appellant

v.

Tara Michelle Cunningham, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICE S PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’ S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on September 22, 2015.

Chet Edward Cunningham has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the

motion, the Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the

motion and dismisses the appeal

. Each party shall bear their own costs rela ting to this appeal,

both in this Court and in the court below.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 4119

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. GIOVANNI OSWALDO AMAYA

- CORNEJO, a/k/a Califas , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. ( 8:16

- cr
- 00383

- DKC

- 1 )

Submitted : September 28, 2018 Decided: October 10, 2018

Before KING and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Michael D. Montemarano, MICHAEL D. MONTEMARANO, PA, Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellant. Ray Daniel McKenzie, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE O F THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Giovanni Oswaldo Amaya

- Cornejo seeks to appeal his conviction and sentence.
The Government has filed a notice s tating that the appeal should be dismissed as untimely. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within 14 days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to 30 days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The district court entered judgment on May 10, 2017. The notice of a ppeal was
filed on February 7, 2018. See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). Because Amaya

- Cornejo failed to file a timely notice of appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period, we agree with the Government’s position and dismiss the appeal as untimely

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### EDENS v. STATE.

No. 23525.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 8, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was assessed a penalty of Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars for violation of the liquor law upon her plea of guilty.

The record before us contains no notice of appeal. Consequently this court has no jurisdiction to consider the case.

The appeal is dismissed.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3600

_____________________________

JOSEPH LANCE MATHIS,

Appellant,

v.

YOMALIES WHITE NKA THON,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County.

William F. Williams, III, Judge.

May 21, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Lucas J. Taylor of Sellers, Taylor & Morrison, P.A., Live Oak, for 

Appellant.

Yomalies White Nka Thon, pro se, Appellee.
| NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                                                                      | FORMER NAME                                    | JURISDICTIONOF FORMATION |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                                                                                    |                                           |                     |
| Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership, LP                                                               | Hartman REIT Operating Partnership, LP         | Delaware                 |
| Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership III GP, LLC                                                       | Hartman REIT Operating Partnership III GP, LLC | Texas                    |
| Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership III LP                                                            | Hartman REIT Operating Partnership III LP      | Texas                    |
| Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership III LP, LTD                                                       | Hartman REIT Operating Partnership III LP, LTD | Texas                    |
| Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership II GP, LLC                                                        | Hartman REIT Operating Partnership II GP, LLC  | Delaware                 |
| Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership II LP                                                             | Hartman REIT Operating Partnership II LP       | Texas                    |
| Whitestone REIT Operating Company IV, LLC                                                               | HCP REIT Operating Company IV, LLC             | Texas                    |
| Whitestone Pima Norte LLC                                                                               | n/a                                            | Texas                    |
| Whitestone CP West LLC                                                                                  | n/a                                            | Texas                    |
| Whitestone Offices LLC                                                                                  | n/a                                            | Texas                    |
| Whitestone Centers LLC                                                                                  | n/a                                            | Texas                    |
| Whitestone Industrial-Office LLCWhitestone Retail Services, L.L.C.Whitestone Brokerage Services, L.L.C. | n/an/an/a                                      | TexasDelawareTexas       |
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40521

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICKY LEE LANDRY,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CR-73-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 15, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ricky Lee Landry challenges his sentence, arguing that the

district court erred in denying him a three-level reduction for

his acceptance of responsibility and erred in making drugquantity calculations. 

The defendant's failure to withdraw voluntarily from

criminal conduct remains an appropriate consideration under the

amended guideline's application notes. U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1,

comment. (n.1(b)). Continued criminal conduct is a sufficient
No. 97-40521

-2-

basis for denying a reduction for acceptance of responsibility. 

See United States v. Watkins, 911 F.2d 983, 985 (5th Cir. 1990). 

Because Landry admitted that he used methadone while on release

pending sentence and because the evidence also showed that Landry

attempted to fabricate the results of his urinalysis, the

district court did not err in denying the three-level reduction.

We further find that the district court’s determination that

Landry was accountable for 12.69 grams of heroin was not clearly

erroneous. United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1575 (5th Cir.

1994). 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2626 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2626

 To extend funding for the Corporation for Travel Promotion under the 
                     Travel Promotion Act of 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2013

  Ms. Titus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend funding for the Corporation for Travel Promotion under the 
                     Travel Promotion Act of 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORATION FOR TRAVEL PROMOTION.

    Section 9(d)(2)(B) of the Travel Promotion Act of 2009 (22 U.S.C. 
2131(d)(2)(B)) is amended by striking ``For each of fiscal years 2012 
through 2015,'' and inserting ``For fiscal year 2012 and each 
subsequent fiscal year,''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 The undersigned, David K. Holeman, Chief Financial Officer of Whitestone REIT (the “Company”), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ David K. HolemanDavid K. HolemanChief Financial Officer
 
 Date:  March 11, 2010
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGIONS 

Ms. Deidra Johnson 

Attorney Supervisor 

1445 ROSS AVENUE, SUITE 1200 

DALLAS TX 75202-2733 

JAN 1 4 2015 

Office of the Secretary, Legal Division 

Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality 

P.O. Box 4302 

Baton Rouge, LA 7082 I -4302 

RE: Additional U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Comments on Proposed Revisions to 

the Louisiana Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permitting Program (AQ349) 

Dear Ms. Johnson: 

Thank you for considering the EPA's comments on AQ349, submitte.d by me on December 2, 2014. 

Upon further review and discussion within our offices, the EPA needs to provide an additional comment 

that is critical to the rulemaking. Please consider the enclosed comment as a supplement to our initial 

comments from December 2, 2014. 

As always, we look forward to working with you in the upcoming year as you address our concerns. 

Please note that our comments today do not constitute final determinations concerning approvability of 

the revisions to the Louisiana PSD program or the State Implementation Plan. If you have any questions 

about the EPA's review of your proposed rulemaking, please feel free to contact me at (2 14) 665-6435 

or contact Ms. Adina Wiley of my staff at (2 14) 665-2 11 5. 

Enclosure 

cc: Mr. Bryan Johnston 

Sincerely, £/ 

9:-ffl\-l,-· 

Jeff Robinson 

Chief 

Air Permits Section 

Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov/region6 

-

Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
Enclosure 

The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) is proposing to remove the significant 

monitoring concentration (SMC) for PM2.s emissions at Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC) 

33:III.509(1)(5)(a) to be consistent with the changes the EPA has made to the federal PSD program as a 

result of the vacatur of that provision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on 

January 22,2013, in Sierra Club v. EPfj., 705 F.3d 458. However, unlike the changes to the federal 

program requirements at 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 51.166(i)(5)(1)(c) which set the PM2.s 

SMC to 0 )..lg/m3

, the LDEQ has proposed to delete the PM2.s SMC entirely. 

This proposed deletion will result in an application contrary to the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the intent 

of the EPA's changes to 40 CFR 51.166(i)(5)(i)(c). When read in concert with the existing requirements 

of the LDEQ's PSD program at LAC 33:III.509(1)(5)(c), the LDEQ PSD program could require no 

ambient moriitoring for emissions of PM2.s; whereas the federal PSD program now requires that any 

source or modification with emissions ofPM2.s greater than 0 )..lg/m3 conduct ambient monitoring for 

PM2.s. 

To maintain consistency with the CAA, the EPA recommends that the LDEQ should revise LAC 

33:III.509(I)(5)(a) to set the PM2.s SMC at 0 !lglm3

, rather than deleting the provision.
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# Certification Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) by Electro Energy Inc. (the Registrant), I, Michael E.
Reed, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

|1. |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Registrant.
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Michael E. Reed
| | -------------------
| |                    

| | Name: Michael E. Reed         
| | ------------------------------
| | Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  April 2, 2007

---
#### Ex parte PATTERSON.

No. 23561.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 16, 1946.

B. R. Reeves, of Palestine, and Festus Mangum, of Crockett, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, fo'r the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Relator was resting under an indictment -of a grand jury charging the voluntary killing with malice of W. H. Sanders, and upon a habeas corpus hearing before the District Judge, he was remanded to jail without bond, from which judgment he appeals.

The testimony herein presented shows that relator entered the store of Mr. Sanders and shot him, presumably firing five shots, one striking the deceased just back of the ear on the left-hand side of the head, and two other shots striking him in the back, leaving powder burns, and two shots going into some shelves. There seems to have been no spoken words heard between these men at the time of the shoot"ing, and we are given no reason for this killing. There seems to have been some intimation of ill will between the deceased and relator, but just to what extent is not shown. Under the facts - presented to this court, we see no reason to disturb the trial court’s refusal of bail.

The cause will therefore be affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5585 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Aminobenzoic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Aminobenzoic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-AMINOBENZOIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4-Aminobenzoic acid (CAS 

No. 150–13–0) (provided for 

in subheading 2922.49.10) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5585 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9742-9743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3814]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Jersey State 
Advisory Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that briefing and planning meetings will 
be convened by the New Jersey State Advisory Committee to the U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights on Friday, March 4, 2011 at the Legislative 
Annex, 125 West State Street, Committee Room 6, Trenton, New Jersey 
08625. In addition, the committee has scheduled a press conference at 1 
p.m. (EST) in Room 1 of the Legislative Annex.
    The purpose of the briefing is to review the accommodations that 
the New Jersey Department of Corrections provides to inmates with non-
apparent disabilities, including mental health, learning, and 
developmental disabilities, as required by the Americans with 
Disabilities Act. The purpose of the planning meeting is to plan future 
activities. The purpose of the press conference is to discuss the 
committee's recent report titled Overcoming the Barriers Faced by 
Immigrants.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by April 4, 2011. 
Written comments may be mailed, e-mailed, or faxed to the Eastern 
Regional Office (ERO). Persons who desire additional information may 
make their request by mail, e-mail, phone, or fax. See contact 
information below.
    Records generated from these meetings may be inspected and 
reproduced at the ERO, as they become available, both before and after 
the meetings. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee 
are directed to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or may 
contact the ERO. See contact information below.
    Persons who are deaf or hearing-impaired who will attend the 
meetings and require the services of a sign language interpreter should 
contact the ERO at least ten (10) days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting either by

[[Page 9743]]

e-mail or through the TDD relay service. See contact information below.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

Contact Information

    Mailing address: Eastern Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil 
Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Suite 740, Washington, DC 20425.
    Telephone #: 202-376-7533.
    Fax #: 202-376-7548.
    E-mail address: ero@usccr.gov.
    TDD: Dial 711 for relay services and dial 202-376-5533.

    Dated in Washington, DC, on February 15, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-3814 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6762

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARK ANTHONY REYNOLDS, a/k/a Mark Anthony

Fain, a/k/a Mark Anthony Wilson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CR-98-27, CA-00-65-1)

Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 18, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Anthony Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin W. Kahle, Jr.,

United States Attorney, Paul Thomas Camilletti, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mark Anthony Reynolds seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion to recuse the district court judge, his

motion for bail, and his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b),

seeking relief from the court’s judgment denying his motion filed

under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Reynolds, Nos. CR-98-27; CA-00-65-1

(N.D.W. Va. Mar. 23, 2001). We deny Reynolds’ motion for bail and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1 

### Sutton, Tia
From: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 1:48 PM To: Hengst, Benjamin; Sutton, Tia; Timothy.Mullins@dot. gov; james.tamm@dot.gov Cc: Achanta, Chandana L. Subject: RE: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on HD Phase II NO PR Attachments: EO 12866 Summary Comments on EPA-NHTSA Heavy Duty G HG and Fuel Economcy NOPR - 6_4_2015.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed


### All, Additional comments on HD Phase II as discussed earlier today. Chad