alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.10


 


September
06, 2016


 


Re: Offer
Letter


 


Dear
Dakota,


 


On behalf
of Thor Trucks (the “Company”), I am pleased to offer you employment with Thor Trucks in the position of CEO, starting on
September 07, 2016. In that position, you will report to None.


 


During your
employment, you will be paid a base salary at the annual rate of $1.00. Your compensation will be paid in regular installments in accordance
with the Company’s regular payroll process, and subject to applicable tax and other withholdings. As an exempt employee, you will
not be eligible for any overtime pay. This position is a fulltime regular salary will be pro-rated based on a 60 hour work week.


 


At-Will
Employment: Your employment with the Company is “at will,” and thus you or Company may terminate our employment relationship
at any time, with or without cause or advance notice. The Company reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to change your compensation
and/or employee benefits at any time on a prospective basis.


 


Additional
Agreements: As a condition of your employment, you agree to execute any additional agreements required by the Company at the start
of your employment. This includes any agreements that relate to your confidentiality or intellectual property assignment obligations
to the Company. You further agree that at all times during your employment (and afterwards as applicable), you will be bound by, and
will fully comply with, these additional agreements.


 


Contingencies:
This offer is contingent upon the successful completion of any background or reference checks desired by the Company. For purposes
of federal immigration law, you will be required to provide to the Company documentary evidence of your identity and eligibility for
employment in the United States. Such documentation must be provided to us within three business days following the start of your employment,
or our employment relationship with you may be terminated.


 




     


     


    

 


Additional
Terms and Conditions of Offer:


 


Entire
Agreement: This employment agreement, along with the Confidentiality Agreement, sets forth the terms and conditions of your employment
with the Company, and supersedes any prior representations or agreements concerning your employment with the Company, whether written
or oral. You acknowledge and agree that you are not relying on any statements or representations concerning the Company or your employment
with the Company except those made in this agreement. This employment agreement may not be modified or amended except by a written agreement
signed by you and an authorized officer of the Company.


 


This offer
of employment will expire September 09, 2016 at 5:00 pm.


 


Dakota, we
are excited by the prospect of you joining the Company.


 


Sincerely,


 


	Thor Trucks	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Dakota
    Semler	 
	Name: 	 Dakota Semler	 
	Title:	 CEO	 



 


**********************************


I hereby
agree to and accept employment with the Company on the terms and conditions set forth in this offer letter.


 


	/s/ Dakota Semler		



 


Dakota Semler


Dated: 09/06/2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA), INC.,

ZTE (TX), INC.

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00487-ADA

ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY DISCOVERY HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

DISCOVERY HEARING by zoom on Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 10:30 AM. The link

for the hearing will be sent by e-mail.

zoom

set

IT 19th day of March, 2021.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 62 Filed 03/19/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2596]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m. on February 10, 2000.

PLACE: The Commission's National Office at One Lafayette Centre, 1120 
20th St., N.W., 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20036-3419.

STATUS: Pursuant to 29 CFR Sec. 2203.3(a) this meeting will be open to 
the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The meeting previously scheduled for February 
10, 2000 will be opened to allow the Commission to discuss the 
evaluation of the Commission's pilot program for the Settlement Part 
(29 CFR Sec. 2200.120) and of E-Z Trial (29 CFR Secs. 2200.200-211). 
The Commission also will consider whether to extend the pilot program 
for the Settlement Part in order to complete the evaluation.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Earl R. Ohman, Jr., General 
Counsel, (202) 606-5410.

Earl R. Ohman, Jr.,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-2596 Filed 2-1-00; 4:18 pm]
BILLING CODE 7600-01-M
Exhibit 99.1

                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

                  I, Janice Ott Rotunno, a duly elected and acting officer of
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby
certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that:

                  1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the
Indenture Trustee of the application of trust money collected by the Indenture
Trustee pursuant to Section 5.3 of the Indenture under which the Trust's notes
(the "Notes") were issued during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 (the
"Relevant Year"); and

                  2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above,
and except as provided in the information furnished by the Indenture Trustee for
purposes of the auditor's report delivered pursuant to Section 2.2(a)(x) of the
Amended and Restated Administrative Services Agreement dated as of August 16,
2005, between AMACAR Pacific Corp. and Allstate Life Global Funding, to the best
of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the Indenture
Trustee pursuant to Section 5.3 of the Indenture was performed in accordance
with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year.


J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as Indenture Trustee


By:      /s/ Janice Ott Rotunno
         -----------------------------------
         Name:  Janice Ott Rotunno
         Title:  Vice President


Date:     March 27, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC 

 

v. Case No.: 6:20-cv-00489-ADA 

 

ZTE CORPORATION ET AL 

ORDER 

BE IT REMEMBERED on this day, there was presented to the Court the Motion for Admission 

Pro Hac Vice filed by Julianne Laporte (“Applicant”), counsel for , and the Court, having reviewed the 

motion, enters the following order: 

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED, and Applicant 

may appear on behalf of in the above case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately 

tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local 

Court Rule AT-1(f)(2). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the corresponding Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice was 

e-filed, the attorney who filed the Motion on behalf of the Applicant is directed to notify the Applicant 

of this order. 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Applicant, pursuant to the Administrative Policies and 

Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal cases in the Western District of Texas, shall 

register as a filing user within 10 days of the date of this Order, if he/she has not previously done so on 

a prior case in this District. 

SIGNED this the 28th day of December, 2021. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00489-ADA Document 148 Filed 12/28/21 Page 1 of 1
#### MOORE v. STATE.

No. 22605.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1943.

W. M. Zachry, of Waco, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

For the offense of murder, the appellant was assessed two years in the state penitentiary.

No statement of facts accompanies the record. In the absence thereof, the exceptions to the charge cannot be appraised.

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MITCHELL D. DIVENTURA,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 19 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of March , 201 7

, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED , and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED

.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0001700 28-APR-2014 08:52 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5606 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5606

 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain children's wallets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Ellison introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain children's wallets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CHILDREN'S WALLETS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Children's wallets  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          with outer                                                        12/31/2015
                          surface of
                          plastic each
                          valued not over
                          $1.00 and with
                          dimensions not
                          exceeding 26 cm x
                          11.5 cm and with
                          artwork or
                          graphics using
                          cartoon
                          characters or
                          other children's
                          motif (provided
                          for in subheading
                          4202.32.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Western District of Texas

Plaintiff

v. 6:20-CV-00487-ADA

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT

12/16/2021

Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP

333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200

Redwood Shores, California 94065

ZTE CORPORATION ET AL.

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT

(650) 453-5171

(650) 453-5170

hkim@kasowitz.com

/s/ Heather S. Kim

Attorney’s signature

Heather S. Kim (CA Bar No. 277686)

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 136 Filed 12/16/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0477

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LAURA LEE HALE,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 12, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 29 2022

08/29/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0477
Exhibit ‘N’

Subject to Protective Order. Provided to Court for in camera review pursuant to 

Order. 

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 112-14 Filed 10/27/22 Page 1 of 1
1

PDR No. ____________________ 

Court of Appeals No. 11-12-00019-CR 

RICKEY ELLISON § IN THE TEXAS COURT OF 

§

v. § CRIMINAL APPEALS

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS § AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PRO SE

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: 

 Now comes RICKEY ELLISON, Petitioner in the above styled and 

numbered cause, and moves this Court for a 90-day extension to file his Pro Se 

Petition for Discretionary Review, and would show as follows: 

1. Petitioner has been convicted of the felony offense of Murder and 

assessed a sentence of life imprisonment in the 331st District Court of Travis 

County, Texas. 

2. The Eleventh District Court of Appeals issued an published decision 

in this case on August 13, 2015. Rickey Ellison v. State of Texas, 11-12-00019-

CR (Tex.App.- Eastland August 25, 2015). Petitioner did not file a motion for 

Rehearing. The PDR in this case is due on or before September 14, 2015. 

3. The undersigned counsel was appointed in the present case to 

PD-1157-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 9/3/2015 2:17:27 PM

Accepted 9/9/2015 9:17:11 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
2

represent Petitioner on direct appeal, but will not be continuing his representation 

in seeking a petition for discretionary review. 

4. In order to pursue his options, Petitioner needs time to retain counsel, 

or to obtain the record and other necessary documents in which to prepare a PDR 

on a pro se basis. Accordingly, the undersigned counsel request on Petitioner’s 

behalf a 90 day extension of time to file his Petition for Discretionary Review in 

this case.

5. Petitioner’s personal information for the purposes of notices by this 

Court is as follows:

Mr. Rickey Ellison

# 00333498

TDCJ Allred Unit

2101 FM 369 North

Iowa Park, TX 76367

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Petitioner prays that this 

Court grant this Motion, and grant an additional 90 days to file a PDR in this case

Respectfully submitted,

Law Office of Alexander L. Calhoun

4301 W. William Cannon Dr., Ste. B-150, # 260

Austin, TX 78749

Tele: 512/ 420-8850

Fax: 512/ 233 - 5946

Cell: 512/ 731-3159

Email: alcalhoun@earthlink.net
3

BY:_/s/ Alexander L Calhoun ___

Alexander L. Calhoun

State Bar No.: 00787187

Attorney for Rickey Ellison

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 4, 2015, a copy of the above and foregoing 

motion has been served upon the Travis County District Attorney's Office, BlackwellThurman Justice Complex, Austin, TX 78767 by email to opposing counsel at the 

following address: scott.talliaferro@co.travis.tx.us and by United States Mail to the 

State Prosecution Attorney by U.S. Mail at the following address:

P.O. Box 13046

Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711

by United States Mail.

 /s/ Alexander L Calhoun 

Alexander L. Calhoun
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC. 

AND ZTE (TX), INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00487-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00488-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00489-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00490-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00491-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00492-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00493-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00494-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00495-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00496-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00497-ADA

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A 

SUR-REPLY BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ REPLY BRIEF IN THE 

MOTION TO TRANSFER

This Court, having considered Plaintiff WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing 

and Development’s Opposed Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply Brief in Response to 

Defendants’ Reply Brief in the Motion to Transfer to the Northern District of Texas, hereby 

ORDERS that this motion is DENIED.

SIGNED AND ENTERED this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.

________________________________

ALAN D. ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 46-1 Filed 12/04/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.1    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   Board of Directors The Standard Register Company Dayton, Ohio  We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of March 30, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the thirteen week periods ended March 30, 2008 and April 1, 2007.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.  Based upon our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of December 30, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 10, 2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 30, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects.   /S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP   Dayton, Ohio April 30, 2008
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL 

INC., AND EMC CORPORATION,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00477-ADA

PATENT CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STAY PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW

Having considered Defendants’ Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (the 

“motion”), the Court finds the motion should be DENIED. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED 

that Defendants’ motion is DENIED.

Date: 

PRESIDING JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 113-2 Filed 08/25/21 Page 1 of 1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Stephen J. Smith, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Elizabeth Arden, Inc. (the "registrant");

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

The Estate of Raffaele Martini Pandozy, Deceased

No. 06

- 20

- 00104

- CV Appeal from the Probate Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. PR

- 18

- 03717

- 1 ). Opinion deli vered by Justice Stevens

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below. We affirm the trial court ’ s vexatious litigant order. We note that the appellant has adequately indicated h er inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 3, 2021 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K . Autrey , Clerk