alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 198 (Thursday, October 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26190]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2443]


Petition for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

October 5, 2000.
    Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's 
rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of this document is 
available for viewing and copying in Room CY-257, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to this petition must 
be filed by October 27, 2000. See section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's 
rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 
10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.

Subject

Toll Free Service Access Codes (CC Docket No. 95-155)
Database Services Management, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling
Beehive Telephone Company Petition for Declaratory Ruling

    Number of Petitions Filed: 3.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26190 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
#### William Pennington, Appellant, *v.*Howard H. Blake, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

May 2, 1957.

*Solomon Fisher*for appellant.

*Warhurton & Connolly*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

It was established from the oral and documentary evidence herein that plaintiff produced a customer for defendant’s business in accordance with the terms of his employment and that there was a meeting of the minds on all the *271essential terms of the transaction. Defendant’s written representation that he had a five-year lease on the premises at an indicated graduated rental over the term of the lease was clear and unequivocal. Plaintiff’s right to commissions may not be defeated by reason of the fact that the transaction failed of consummation because of defendant’s inability to produce such a lease.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to plaintiff, and judgment directed for the plaintiff in the sum of $600, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5441 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5441

  To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on formulations of [3-(4,5-
 dihydro-1,2-oxazol-3-yl)-4-mesyl-o-tolyl](5-hydroxy-1-methylpyrazol-4-
                             yl)methanone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on formulations of [3-(4,5-
 dihydro-1,2-oxazol-3-yl)-4-mesyl-o-tolyl](5-hydroxy-1-methylpyrazol-4-
                             yl)methanone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORMULATIONS OF [3-(4,5-DIHYDRO-1,2-OXAZOL-3-YL)-4-MESYL-O-
              TOLYL](5-HYDROXY-1-METHYLPYRAZOL-4-YL)METHANONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Formulations of [3- Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (4,5-dihydro-1,2-                                                 12/31/2015
                          oxazol-3-yl)-4-
                          mesyl-o-tolyl](5-
                          hydroxy-1-
                          methylpyrazol-4-
                          yl)methanone (CAS
                          No. 210631-68-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3808.93.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00339

- CR

IN RE GARY DWAYNE BA RNETT

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis , and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opi nion delivered and filed November 13, 2014

[OT06]In re Gary Dwayne Barnett Page 2
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG   Document 44-2   Filed 02/25/21   Page 1 of 1
# AGENCY:

 National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

# ACTION:

 Notice of Availability of Booker T. Washington National Monument Abbreviated Final General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement.

# SUMMARY:

                         The National Park Service has prepared and released an Abbreviated Final General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement for the management, protection, use, and development of Booker T. Washington National Monument in Hardy, Virginia. A record of decision will be signed by the Regional Director, Northeast Region, National Park Service thirty days after this notice is published in the                         **Federal Register**                        . Copies of the Booker T. Washington National Monument Abbreviated Final General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement are available at Booker T. Washington National Monument and at the Franklin County Public Library in Rocky Mount, Virginia. The document can be viewed on the monument's web site (http://www.nps.gov/​bowa).                    

For more information, contact the Superintendent, Booker T. Washington National Monument, 12130 Booker T. Washington Highway, Hardy, VA 24101-9688. The superintendent's phone number is 540-721-2094.

Dated: December 17, 1999.

Dale Ditmanson,

Associate Regional Director, Operations, NER.

[FR Doc. 00-2611 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL 

INC., AND EMC CORPORATION,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00473-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00474-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00475-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00476-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00477-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00478-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00479-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00480-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00481-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00482-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00485-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00486-ADA

PATENT CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

Having considered Defendants’ Motion for Intra-District Transfer of Venue to the Austin 

Division of the Western District of Texas (the “motion”), the Court finds the motion should be 

DENIED. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is DENIED.

Date:

Presiding Judge

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 51-6 Filed 11/18/20 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 15

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 42-17 Filed 11/04/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 42-17 Filed 11/04/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 42-17 Filed 11/04/20 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5655 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5655

  To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1-Propanone, 2-hydroxy-2-
                           methyl-1-phenyl-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2012

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1-Propanone, 2-hydroxy-2-
                           methyl-1-phenyl-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-PROPANONE, 2-HYDROXY-2-METHYL-1-PHENYL-.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1-Propanone, 2-     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          hydroxy-2-methyl-                                                 12/31/2015
                          1-phenyl- (CAS
                          No. 7473-98-5)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2914.40.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
----

 EXHIBIT 31.1

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 I, Gordon Watts, certify that: 

      1. I have reviewed this annual  report on Form 10-KSB of Wood Products, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2004;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this  annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit  to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of  the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with  respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

      3. Based on my knowledge, the  financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results  of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented  in this annual report. 

      4. The registrant’s other  certifying offering officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)  and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls  and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within  those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is  being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the  period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed  in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that  has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting; and 

      5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal  control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit  committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent  function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design  or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably  likely to adversely effect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize  and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the  registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: June 29, 2004

/s/ Gordon William Watts  Gordon William Watts  President 

----
[4910-I3-PI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 

## ,-1/& 

# .~-.

-II (., ~" 

## ~f-; ;-CjL-



### ~" EMB-135ER, -135KE. -135KL. and -135LR AUpIanes. and Model EMB-145, -145ER (pI ,s-\ '0 Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) M 14 CFR Part 39 lDocket~O. FAA-2008-1079; Directol":llte Identifier 2008-NM-116-AD; Amendme 

# 3J-If·r AD 

# .'1'-

# ;]DI0- 

# 11,0- 0I RIN Z120-AA64

-145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP Ai']llanes (DOl). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation 

# -T 

# ""CF.'"~ SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for the ""'t I 

# '7/IYVllo products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness """'''''''MO.

# *
informalion (MeAl) issued by an 'ilWOrthin,,! authority of Mothe, country to identif 

# 77'1;,':;;, '" andcorrect anunsafe condition on an aviation JrOdUct.The earlier MeAl. 

### Brazilian ""// 

# f (i) I """'_ •• ,,""'- AiI"'Northincss Directive 2007-08-02, effective September 27, 2007. describes the uns 

## e - (0 

## I condition as; Fuel system reassessment., pcrfonned according to RBHA-E88/SF AR-88 (Regulamento Brasileiro de Homologacao Aeronautica 88/Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88), requires the inclusion of new maintenance tasks inthe Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL) and in the Fuel System Limitations (FSL), necessary to preclude ignition sources inthe fuel system.•••

FAA Form 1:160-14.1 (6-S9) OFFICIAL FILE COPY
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 00-124] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space Science Advisory Committee, Solar System Exploration Subcommittee. 

# DATES:

Monday, October 30, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Tuesday, October 31, 2000, 8:30 a.m. 5 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, (IPAC), Conference Room 102, in Building 22, 770 South Wilson Road, Pasadena, California 91125. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jay Bergstralh, Code SR, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-0735. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows:

—Mars Architecture Development 

—Europa Mission Update 

—Outer Planets Science Strategy 

—Pluto Science Drivers 

—Future Outer Planets Mission Options

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 

Dated: October 5, 2000.

Beth M. McCormick,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-26203 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
CERTIFICATION
 
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (SUBSECTIONS
(a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
 TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE)
 
 
 Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of 2-Track Global, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of 2-Track on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "10-KSB Report") that:
 
 (1)  the
10-KSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the
information contained in the 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
2-Track.
 
 Dated:  March 29,
2005    2-Track
Global, Inc.
 
 
 /s/
Woosun Jung
 Woosun
Jung
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 /s/
Jimmy Millard
 Jimmy
Millard
 Chief
Financial Officer
#### Martha HABLE, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 26813.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 16, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of marijuana; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

Appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified, requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The motion is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed.
#### BELL v. STATE.

No. 23534.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 15, 1947.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1947.

*657No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for murder without malice with a punishment of four years in the penitentiary. The facts of the case are much the same as in the former trial (see Bell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 189 S.W.2d 1022) in which the sentence was two years in the penitentiary.

 The record is before us without-bills of exception. The charge of the court is quite lengthy, but we believe that when considered in its entirety it fairly presents the law on all issues, raised by the testimony. Lengthy exceptions to the court’s charge were filed, but they are of such general nature that they do not advise us with sufficient clarity the grounds for such general exceptions. No brief has been filed in behalf of the appellant and we are unable to determine with certainty the complaint which he may have in mind. We are furnished with no authorities in support of the exceptions.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

In connection with his motion for rehearing, appellant presents a-brief and .argument in which he insists that his exception and objection to the charge on self-defense as being too restrictive should have been sustained.

, Apparently, as a result of the exception ; mentioned, the trial court submitted self-defense not only from the standpoint of a deadly'attack on the part of the deceased, but also from a lesser attack, as prescribed in Article 1224, P.C.

We are unable to agree with appellant that his right of self-defense was not fully presented by the trial court in his charge.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court
#### Ex parte George OUTLAW.

No. 27275.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 13, 1954.

John Cutler, Houston, for appellant,

Ewing Werlein, Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY/ Judge.

Appellant is held in custody by the sheriff of Harris County, Texas, to answer an indictment charging him with felony theft after two previous convictions for felonies less than capital.

Bond having been set in the sum of $10,000, appellant made his application to Hon. Langston King, District Judge, for a reduction of bail, alleging his ability to make bond in the sum of $500.

At the hearing the state rested after offering in evidence the indictment, appellant having testified that he was unable to make a $10,000 bond but, perhaps, could make one in the sum of $500.

Judge King ordered that the bond be reduced and set at $5,000, from which order notice of appeal was given.

Thereafter appellant filed a motion to further reduce said bail, alleging that neither he nor his attorney had been able to procure bail in the amount .of $5,000. He again prayed that the bond be reduced to $500, or that he be released on his own recognizance. If any evidence was heard upon this motion it is not shown in the record. It is shown, however, that Judge King endorsed the motion “Refused”.

The motion, though sworn to, was but a pleading and did not prove the allegations therein. Ex parte Bowers, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 273, 98 S.W.2d 191; Ex parte Ambrose, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 582, 170 S.W.2d 731.

But even though said motion be sufficient to show an unsuccessful effort on the part of appellant to make bond in the sum of $5,000, we are unable to agree that bond in that amount' is unreasonable and excessive.

As appellant points out, Art. 281, C.C.P. sets forth the rules which govern the exercise of discretion by the judge or officer in- determining the amount of bail to be required, one of which includes the circumstances under which the offense was committed. It does not follow that in every case wherein a reduction of bond is sought the state is required to offer proof *666as to the facts surrounding the commission of the offense.

The contention of appellant that the state is required to offer evidence as to the commission of the offense is answered in Ex parte Davis, Tex.Cr.App., 261 S.W.2d 322, and Ex parte Cascio, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 288, 144 S.W.2d 886.

$5,000 bail, in a case charging felony theft after two previous convictions for felonies less than capital, is not as a matter of law unreasonable or excessive.

The judgment is affirmed.