alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

***Certification pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

***(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)***

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of American States Water Company andGolden State Water Company (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I Floyd E. Wicks, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| /s/ Floyd E. Wicks |   |
|--------------------|--------|

 

Floyd E. WicksChief Executive Officer

Date: November 8, 2006

** **

 

1

----
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 26883.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 10, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

■ The conviction is for possession of whis-ky for the purpose of sale in a dry area, the jury having assessed a fine of $100.

The statement of facts shows that two deputy sheriffs found five half-pint bottles of. whisky in appellant’s car, they having searched the car with appellant’s permission in the City of Tyler.

Appellant testified admitting his possession of the whisky, but contending that he had no intention of selling it.

Nowhere in the record do we find any proof of the dry status of Tyler or of Smith County.

In the absence of this proof the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2190

WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE STATE OF MARYLAND; THE STATE OF WEST

VIRGINIA; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-01-778-2)

Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lee Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William Lee Richardson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss

the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Richardson

v. Maryland, No. CA-01-778-2 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.12



Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement



Reference is made to the Employment Agreement, made and entered into as of January 28, 2000 among American Seafoods, L.P.,
American Seafoods Group LLC and Bernt O. Bodal (the Employment Agreement).



The parties hereto agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows, effective as of March 25, 2005:



Section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:



3. Compensation.



(b) Bonus. In addition to Base Salary, Executive may receive an annual
bonus of an amount to be determined by the Board in its sole discretion, taking into consideration individual and corporate performance. Further, Executive shall be entitled to receive with respect to each fiscal year during the Employment Term a
nondiscretionary bonus if the EBITDA (as defined on Schedule I hereto) of Parent and its subsidiaries in such fiscal year exceeds certain targets. The amount and calculation of such bonus are described with particularity on Schedule I hereto. In no
event will (i) the nondiscretionary bonus be payable if at the time of payment or at any time during the year of measurement the Company was in default under any credit agreement relating to indebtedness for borrowed money or (ii) the annual bonus
(including discretionary and nondiscretionary portions thereof) in any year exceed 300% of Executives Base Salary. The annual bonus with respect to any year, if any, shall be paid within 30 days after the receipt by the Board of audited
financial statements for Parent and its subsidiaries for the pertinent year.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of March 29, 2005.



AMERICAN SEAFOODS GROUP LLC:By:

/s/    BRAD BODENMANName:

Brad BodenmanTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




EXECUTIVE:/s/    BERNT O. BODALBernt O. Bodal




AMERICAN SEAFOODS:  AMERICAN SEAFOODS, L.P.  By: ASC Management, Inc.By:

/s/    BERNT O. BODALName:

Bernt O. BodalTitle:

Director
#### MORGAN v. STATE.

No. 23895.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1948.

R. H. Dent, of Hemphill, for appellant.

L. E. King, County Atty., of Hemphill, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*413DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquor in a dry area.

The information charges only that Sabine County, where the offense was alleged to have been committed, was a dry area. This is not sufficient. There must be allegations showing the dry status — that is, an election and the order canvassing the returns and declaring the result and the publication of the result. See Kight v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 590, 101 S.W.2d 258; Ballew v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 534, 106 S.W.2d 284; Trapp v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 235, 167 S.W.2d 525.

Because the information fails to charge an offense, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice
133348-49 & (66) Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff, Stephen J. Markman, Counter Defendant-Appellant, Justices v SC: 133348-49 COA: 260766, 261504 Oakland CC: 02-039177-CZ A&A MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., RENAISSANCE PHYSICAL THERAPY, L.L.C., RAHAT MALIK, PHYSICIANS REHABILITATION, L.L.C., ZUBAIR RATHUR, IMAN FAWAZ, and FIRST CHOICE REHAB, INC., Defendants, Counter Plaintiffs-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Miller v Allstate (After Remand) (Docket Nos. 134393, 134406), is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolv e an issue raised in the pres ent application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in

that case.

t1114 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 21, 2007

Clerk
n/09/201 1 15:1 9 FA X 202493514 2 FA A - DM S 0002/00 2 

## ,Jhl^^,1EN T O F -j'^fA'SPORTATIO N NOV . 2 , 201 1 

## NO V - o p J , 2 1 M ynam e i s Sric e Thompson . I a m answerin g t o a complain t o f propose d civi l penalt y

1 . 1 wa s o n southwes t airline s fligh t 25 1 from Boston,mas s t o Reno,nv . 3 . M ymothe raske d fo rtomato e juic e t o attenden t fo rvodk a an d h e would' t giv e i t t o her , h e

• - ~ laughe d at " her . H e sai d sh e shoul d hav e aske d fo rtha t i n firs t place . Sh e aske d fo rblood ymar yi n firs t place . 5 . I di d no t strik e anyone . I jus t tol d fligh t attendan t t o leav e m ymo m alone . B yth e tim e m ymo m ha d th e drin k

th e attendant s ar m wa s i n aisl e wit h attendan t aligne d wit h th e bac k o f m ymom' s row . I wa s i n sea t i n fron t b ywindow . I t i s no t possibl e fo rm e t o b e i n sea t b ywindo w i n fron t an d hi t attendan t wh o i s i n aisl e aligne d wit h ro w behin d m e o n th e bac k sid e o f row . M ymo m wa s las t t o ge t serve d i n he rrow . S o attendent s ar m i s i n aisl e wit h attendan t an d h e i s movin g t o nex t row . Besides , i f attendent s ar m wa s stil l servin g m ymom , h e woul d hav e spil t drink .n/09/201 1 15:1 9 FA X 202493514 2 FA A - DM S @]001/00 2

___^ - ~ - ^ • . 0004/00 6 10/\3/20 n 13:0 0 FA I 310725681 6 A.WP- 7 ^^^ ^



## V.S . DEPARTMEPf

T O FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C ^ ^ I n th e Matte r

o f Brie * E . Thompsoo : FAA DOCKE T UNASSIGNE D 

# FA A CAS E 

# NO. 2onwpnoo H Respondeat . JUDGE NO T ASSIGNE D COMPLAINT The Complainanr

files it s Complami , pursuan i to Rul e 20 8 o f th e Rule s o f

Practic e (1 4 C.F.R . 13.208) . an dstate s a s follows ; I Respondent - Bri.c

e E . Thompson , wa s advise dthroug h aFina l Notic e of

Priipose d Civi l Penalt

y (Final Notice) , date dSeptembe r 23 , 2011 , that

th e Federa

l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA ) propose dt o asses s acivi l penalty i n th e amount o f 55,000.00 . O n October

3,201] , Respondent

submitte dawrine n reques t fo r ahearing IF . 1 . O n or

abou t Januar y 4 , 2011 , Respondent

wa s apassenger

o n boar d Southwes t Airline s fligh

i 25 1 fromSal

t Lak e City . Utah , T

O Reno , Nevada . 2 . O n th e abov e occasion , Southwes t AiiUnc s fligh

t 25 1 wa s operaiin g under part 12 1 o f th e Federa

l Aviatroj i Regulations . 3 . Durin g th e fligh

t reference di n paragrap h I , aflight attendant serve da n alcoholi c beverag e T

o apassenger

sittin g on e TO"^ behin dRespondcitt . 4 . Th

e passenger

reference di n paragrap h 3 complaine dto th e fligh t atLcndan t about her alcoholi c beverage . 5 . Responden t

the n Turne

daroun di n Respondent' s sca t /in dstruck the fiigli t attendant' s arm .
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of North State Bancorp (the Company) for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Larry D. BarbourLarry D. BarbourPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Kirk A. WhorfKirk A. WhorfChief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2009
The defendants then filed a notice on December 31, 2008, indicating that the plaintiff’s copy of 1

the defendants’ motion for summary judgment had initially been returned as undeliverable, and

that another copy of the motion was served on the plaintiff at his new address. Notice (Dec. 31,

2008). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JAIME CARVAJAL, :

:

Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 06-2265 (RMU)

:

v. : Re Document No.: 10

:

DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY et al., :

:

Defendants. :

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRANTING THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On December 29, 2006, the pro se plaintiff filed suit against the defendants in the abovecaptioned matter, asserting that the defendants had withheld material that he was entitled to

receive under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. See generally Compl. 

On November 25, 2008, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, urging the court 1

to dismiss the case because (1) the first named defendant, the Drug Enforcement Agency,

properly withheld the requested documentation from release under several exemptions

established in FOIA; (2) the second, third, fourth and fifth named defendants (the Federal Bureau

of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of the Treasury, and the Bureau of

Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) were not sent any FOIA requests; (3) the sixth

named defendant, the Attorney General, is not a proper defendant to this action; and (4) there is

no such entity as the “Freedom of Information/Privacy Agency for the United States,” the last
The defendants’ motion also advised the plaintiff to “take notice that any factual assertions 2

contained in the declarations and other attachments in support of defendants’ motion will be

accepted by the Court as true unless plaintiff submits his own declarations or other documentary

evidence contradicting the assertions in the defendants’ attachments.” Defs.’ Mot. at 1.

2

named defendant. See generally Defs.’ Mot. for Summ. J. 2

Because the plaintiff failed to oppose the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the

court issued an order on May 7, 2009, directing the plaintiff to respond to the motion on or

before May 18, 2009, and warning him that failure to do so could result in the court granting the

motion and entering judgment in favor of the defendants. Order (May 7, 2009). To date, the

plaintiff has failed to oppose the defendants’ motion. Accordingly, pursuant to Local Civil Rule

7(b), the court treats the defendants’ motion for summary judgment as conceded and grants the

motion. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is separately and

contemporaneously issued this 10th day of June, 2009.

 RICARDO M. URBINA

 United States District Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [AZ-040-00-1040-XX]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# SUMMARY:

The purpose of this notice is to announce the next meeting of the Gila Box Riparian National Conservation Area Advisory Committee Meeting. The purpose of the Advisory Committee is to provide informed advice to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Safford Field Manager on management of public lands in the Gila Box Riparian National Conservation Area. The committee meets as needed, generally between two and four times a year.

The meeting will begin at the BLM Safford Field Office on November 3, 2000, commencing at 7 a.m. and ending at 5 p.m. The meeting's agenda will consist of a tour of portions of the Gila Box RNCA with community leaders from Graham and Greenlee counties to build support for the implementation of the Gila Box RNCA management plan. A public comment period will begin at 7 a.m. and may continue for the duration of the meeting at the discretion of the Gila Box Advisory Committee. The public may accompany the Committee and invited guests on the tour, but must provide their own transportation and lunch.

# DATES:

Meeting will be held on November 3, 2000, starting at 7 a.m.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jon Collins, Gila Box RNCA Project Coordinator, BLM, Safford Field Office, 711 14th Avenue, Safford, Arizona 85546; telephone number: (520) 348-4400.

Dated: September 28, 2000.

Wayne King,

Acting Field Office Manager.

[FR Doc. 00-25911  Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
Exhibit 5

Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 28

Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 111-3 Filed 08/20/21 Page 1 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 111-3 Filed 08/20/21 Page 2 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 111-3 Filed 08/20/21 Page 3 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 111-3 Filed 08/20/21 Page 4 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 111-3 Filed 08/20/21 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                  ------------

                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2005-12
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-12


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                    Dated: March 24, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                    Dated: March 24, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
From: Chris Bullock

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Cc: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: IIG CBI information

Date: Friday, January 27, 2012 5:06:41 PM

Attachments: Emission Calc vs EPA Proposed Non CBI 26jan12.xlsx



### Ms. Hancy,

Please find enclosed a non-CBI version of our emissions spreadsheet. As soon as I receive a hard

copy of the full report, I will mail it along with a copy of the CBI spreadsheet. If you have any

questions please feel free to contact me at 205-603-8498.

Sincerely,

Chris Bullock

V.P. MinWool

Industrial Insulation Group, LLC

From: Hancy, Cindy Wang [mailto:chancy@rti.org]

Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:31 PM

To: Chris Bullock

Cc: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov; Reeves, David

Subject: IIG CBI information



### Chris,

Per our phone conversation, below are the directions on sending CBI materials.

Clearly mark the disk and/or the materials with the words “Confidential Business Information” and

send either via U.S. Postal Service Express Mail, registered mail, or private courier to:

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

US EPA Mailroom (C-404-02)

Attn: Mr. Roberto Morales, DCO (Project 0-10)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

We will also be waiting for the non-CBI version of the spreadsheet sent on 12/28/2011 to Susan

Fairchild (see below).

Regards,

Cindy Wang Hancy

RTI International

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541-6623

### Fax: (919) 316-3420

From: "Chris Bullock" < bullockc@iig-llc.com >

To: Susan Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/28/2011 03:12 PM

Subject: Emission Data

Ms. Fairchild,

Please find the enclosed spreadsheet for our test data from 11/17/2011.

These tests points were taken from the stacks and not duct work within the

plant. Stack 1 has emissions from the Cupola and the Collection Drum. Stack

2 has emissions from the oven. The oven and the collection drum are not tied

together anywhere so there is no way to pull a single combined sample. If

you have any questions please call me at 205-603-8498.

Sincerely,

Chris Bullock

V.P. MinWool

Industrial Insulation Group, LLC(See attached file: Emission Calc vs EPA

Proposed 12.11.11.xlsx)(See attached file: No 1 Stack HCl and HF

midget.pdf)(See attached file: No 1 Stack NCASI 98 01.pdf)(See attached

file: No 2 Stack NCASI 98 01.pdf)
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended on June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and to which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Robert E. Lowder, the principal executive officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 4, 2005



/s/    ROBERT E.
LOWDERRobert E. Lowder Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and will be retained by The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection  with this annual  report on Form 10-KSB of Tennessee  Valley
Financial  Holdings,  Inc.  I,  Thomas E. Tuck,  President  and Chief  Executive
Officer of Tennessee  Valley  Financial  Holdings,  Inc.,  certify,  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in this report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings, Inc.

Date: March 31, 2003                                /s/ Thomas E. Tuck
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Thomas E. Tuck
                                                    President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer