alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Newcastle Investment Corp.
(the "Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Debra A.
Hess, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Debra A. Hess
-------------------------------------
Debra A. Hess
Chief Financial Officer
March 16, 2005

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                  END OF FILING
EXHIBIT 32



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer



Certification of Periodic Financial Report



Jae Whan Yoo and Lonny D. Robinson hereby certify as follows:



1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of Center Financial Corporation.



2. The Form 10-K of Center Financial Corporation for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Center Financial Corporation.



|                      |  |                                                                                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Jae Whan Yoo                                                                                                 
|                      |  | Jae Whan Yoo                                                                                                     
|                      |  | President & Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                                                
|                      | 
|Dated: March 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Lonny D. Robinson                                                                                            
|                      |  | Lonny D. Robinson                                                                                                
|                      |  | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

ZTE CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00487-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00488-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00489-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00490-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00491-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00492-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00493-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00494-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00495-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00496-ADA-DTG

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00497-ADA-DTG

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES

This Court, having considered disputes raised by Defendant ZTE Corporation 

(“Defendant”) and Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development

(“Plaintiff”) during the June 21, 2022, Discovery Hearing, hereby ORDERS the following:

1. Defendant’s request to compel Plaintiff to tender its 30(b)(6) witnesses is DENIED 

AS MOOT. 

2. The current July 1, 2022 deadline for the close of fact discovery is extended to 

August 1, 2022. The parties will further meet-and-confer regarding respective extensions to the 

subsequent deadlines for the docket schedule for the Court’s consideration.

3. Defendant’s request to compel Plaintiff’s production of documents (1) responsive 

to Defendant’s initial 70 Requests for Production and (2) from sister WDTX cases is again 

DENIED; although the Court previously GRANTED Defendant’s request to compel by email 

Case 6:20-cv-00492-ADA-DTG Document 246 Filed 12/21/22 Page 1 of 2
order, the Court subsequently reconsidered and DENIED Defendant’s request to compel. (Case 

No. 6:20-cv-00487-ADA, Dkt. 185). 

4. Defendant’s request to compel Plaintiff’s production of unredacted versions of the 

sealed filings and respective attachments, declarations, exhibits, and affidavits thereto (including 

Dkts. 135, 155, and 167) in WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. 

Microsoft Corporation, Case No. 6:20-cv-00454-ADA (W.D. Tex.), is DENIED.

5. Defendant’s request to compel Plaintiff’s production of unredacted versions of the 

sealed filings and respective attachments, declarations, exhibits, and affidavits thereto (including 

Dkts. 53, 61, 67, 71, and 75) in WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development 

v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Case No. 6:20-cv-00730-ADA (W.D. Tex.), is DENIED.

6. Defendant’s request to compel Plaintiff’s production of security and loan 

agreements with BP Funding Trust and OT Terrier Holdings is DENIED.

7. Plaintiff’s request for costs and fees is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The 

Court is reluctant to award costs and fees at this time, but will consider them in the future should 

either party re-raise previously adjudicated disputes. 

Signed this 21st day of December, 2022.

____________________________________

DEREK GILLILAND

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00492-ADA-DTG Document 246 Filed 12/21/22 Page 2 of 2
#### Angelo Caiazzo, Plaintiff *v.*Hall Developers, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

August 7, 1957.

*Andrew J. Dritsas*for plaintiff.

*Caesar L. Pitassy*and *8. Gilmer Towel*for defendants.

Lloyd I. Hebzka, J.

Application for an injunction *pendente lite*enjoining the defendants, pending the determination of the action, from removing all miscellaneous pipes, radiators, kitchen and bathroom fixtures from the inside of certain vacant buildings.

Plaintiff’s action is predicated upon a written demolition contract between plaintiff and defendant Hall Developers, Inc., wherein plaintiff as contractor agreed to remove the above-mentioned fixtures at a stipulated price. Plaintiff charges that he has performed all the terms of the contract but that defendant Hall Developers, Inc., has prevented him from completing the contract and has contracted with the defendant Eagle Demolition Corp. to remove the aforesaid fixtures and has denied the plaintiff the right to go upon the premises to remove the equipment. Defendant Hall categorically denies that plaintiff *55has duly performed the terms of the contract and contends that plaintiff breached its terms necessitating its termination because of such breach and that plaintiff was notified to that effect. That the difficulties with plaintiff having seriously delayed the demolition work and time being of the essence, defendant entered into a new contract with one Promontory Construction Co., Inc., to complete the job, who in turn subcontracted the job to the defendant Eagle Demolition Corp.

The facts upon which the ultimate decision must be made are bitterly disputed and the truth of the matter is impossible of determination without a trial when the witnesses can be examined and cross-examined. The burden of establishing the undisputed right to the drastic relief of a temporary injunction is upon the party seeking it *(Pinehill-Kingston Bus Corp.*v. *Davis,*225 App. Div. 182), which the plaintiff has failed to establish. The right to the relief sought herein is dependent upon issues which can only be decided upon the trial *(Voorhees and Hobart, Inc.,*v. *Hobart,*251 App. Div. 111). As this action appears basically one for breach of contract seeking money damages and the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law, he is not entitled to obtain the relief he now seeks *(Eastern Rock Products*v. *Natanson,*239 App. Div. 529; *Perlin*v. *Greenberg,*196 Misc. 865; *Birn*v. *Childs Co.,*36 N. Y. S. 2d 250), particularly so where the ultimate relief sought is of doubtful nature *(Gittlin Bag Co.*v. *Bresky,*279 App. Div. 570).

Accordingly, the motion is denied. However, the court feels that the plaintiff should have an early trial and the plaintiff is directed to place the case on the calendar for the first available term at the head of the calendar for an immediate trial, subject to the approval of the Justice presiding thereat. Settle order on notice.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25212]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Biomolecular Structure and Function; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Panel for Biomolecular Structure and Function--
(1134) (Panel B).
    Date and Time: October 23-25, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 340, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Kamal Shukla and Dr. Dagmar Ringe, Program 
Directors, Molecular Biophysics, National Science Foundation, Room 
655, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 292-8444.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate research proposals submitted to 
the Molecular Biophysics Program as part of the selection process 
for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c),(4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 27, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25212 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
CONCRETE
CASTING INCORPORATED




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Concrete Casting Incorporated (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Kevin J. Asher, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
            Kevin
      J. AsherKevin
      J. AsherChief
      Executive Officer
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              Chief
      Accounting OfficerNovember
      13, 2008




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Concrete Casting Incorporated and will be retained by Concrete
Casting Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Basilio Scientific Spiritist Cult Association, Inc.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 29, 1958.

*Bertrand D: Gerber*for petitioner.

Matthew M. Levy, J.

Before me for approval as a membership corporation is a proposed certificate of incorporation of Basilio Scientific Spiritist Cult Association, Inc.

Section 10 of the Membership Corporations Law (which constitutes chapter 35 of the Consolidated Laws) provides for the organization of “ a membership corporation for any lawful purpose, or for two or more such purposes of a kindred or incidental nature ”, but it expressly excepts “a purpose for which a corporation may be created under any general law other than this chapter ’ ’. The Religious Corporations Law is such a general law. It is chapter 51 of the Consolidated Laws and provides, among other things, for the formation of religious corporations, described simply as “ created for religious purposes ”. (Religious Corporations Law, § 2.)

There is a critical distinction between a membership corporation and a religious corporation under our law, although some of the purposes of the former may be appropriately included as functions of the latter. The reason for the distinction is quite fundamental. There are certain governmental controls over lay corporations that would not be recognized as constitutionally *390permissible over religious societies (cf. *Kedroff*v. *St. Nicholas Cathedral,*344 U. S. 94). For “ [t]he free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed in this state to all mankind ” (N. Y. Const., art. I, § 3; see, also, U. S. Const., 1st Arndt.).

Some of the purposes for which the present corporation is to be formed are stated, in substance, to be the protection of the privileges of American residents, the fostering of a healthy interest in civic affairs, the development of good citizenship, the promotion of friendship, the alleviation of human suffering, and the study of spiritism. I note, however, as I read the other purposes set forth in the certificate, that the association seeks not merely to ‘ ‘ study spiritism ’ ’, but also ‘ ‘ to promulgate and promote the spiritist cult of the redemption of God, Jesus, Mary and Joseph * * * and to establish a positive and irrefutable scientific basis of the Cult of Trust and Justice on Earth ”. That cult — as affirmed in the supplemental data, historical and current, supplied by the petitioners at my request — is basically religious in purpose, and its major function is essentially religious in character.

It is not-for me to assume to pass judgment on the religious quality or spiritual probity of the faith here sought to be promulgated and established (cf. *Matter of New York Soul Clinic,*208 Misc. 612). It is my judicial responsibility solely to determine whether the proposed association is or is not in its essence truly to be a religious corporation. That, I am convinced it is, and, as such, I have concluded that the application to approve this association as a membership .corporation should be (and it is) denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
2ND QUARTER 1997 FORM 10-Q OF THE SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE
COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  308,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,100
<INVENTORY>                                     20,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               417,800
<PP&E>                                       4,397,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,026,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,886,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          444,000
<BONDS>                                        666,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       380,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     258,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,886,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               766,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  584,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                159,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                    62,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             97,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,700)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                               
|                                                                                                            
|North Dakota Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                            
|North Dakota Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 10     | 10     | 19     | 15    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 18     | 15     | 21     | 18     | 22     | 30     | 29     | 60     | 113    | 487   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 900    | 1,306  | 2,351  | 3,617  | 3,556  | 3,970  | 3,924  | 4,395  | 4,721  | 4,549 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,688  | 2,717  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
National Tribal Caucus Meeting 

December 8, 2009 

Meeting Note to the Docket 

NTC 

CONFERENCE CALL 

AGENDA 

 

Conference Call Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2009 

Call Time: 3:10-4:00pm (ET)TC/AIEO/NIWG Session 

Dial-In Number: (866) 299-3188 

Conference Code: 2025640378# 

Physical Location: EPA EAST BLDG. 

AIEO Conference Room 3324 

III. NTC/AIEO/NIWG Joint Session – 3:10 - 4:00 pm ET 

1. Roll Call 

2. AIEO Updates 

National Tribal Summit overview on tribal environmental concerns 

AIEO outreach activities to tribes 

 3. Peer matching/technical assistance method discussion – Garret Smith 

 NTC review of Chris’ memo 

 Voucher info submitted 

4. Tribal NSR Rule – Jessica Montanez 

Discussion Topics 

On December 8, 2009, representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) participated in a meeting to update the National Tribal Caucus on the status of the 

rule titled: “Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country.” 

Representatives from the US EPA updated the National Tribal Caucus on: 

• What is the purpose of the rule? 

• What types of sources will be regulated under the rule? 

• Projected Schedule for Finalizing the Rule
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

EL CAMPO VENTURES, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

STRATTON SECURITIES, INC., 

STRATTON OILFIELD SYSTEMS 

TEXAS, LLC, DANIEL STRATTON, 

SHANNON STRATTON,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 1:20-CV-00560-RP

ORDER

Before the court is El Campo Ventures, LLC’s Opposed Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt. 

#113). Upon review, the undersigned finds a hearing would be helpful to adjudicate this dispute.

The court hereby SETS the above motion for a hearing on Wednesday, December 1, 2021, at 

2:00 p.m. in Courtroom Eight on the seventh floor of the Federal Courthouse located at 501 W. 

5th Street, Austin, Texas 78701. 

To assist the court at the hearing, the parties are encouraged to bring a one-page summary 

or chart outlining: (a) the universe of claims originally filed, (b) against which parties, (c) the 

amount of damages sought pursuant to each claim and party, and (d) the final disposition for each 

claim. 

SIGNED November 19, 2021.

_______________________________

MARK LANE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE