alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-144661, 333-143381, 333-125502, 333-116141 and 333-109779 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-115153 on Form S-3 of our reports relating to the consolidated financial statements of Citadel
Broadcasting Corporation and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes a explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Paymentand the
adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109) and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting dated February 29, 2008, appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Citadel Broadcasting Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2007.



|                         
|-------------------------
|                         
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
|Los Angeles, California  
|February 29, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0010

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

DAWN E. PHILLIPS,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 and

FRANK M. BUCKNUM,

 Respondent and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Counsel for Appellant has filed an unopposed motion for extension to file an opening 

brief, because the parties have not been able to participate in mediation. Good cause 

appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extension is GRANTED. Appellant has until 

June 12, 2020, within which to file the opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 6 2020

04/06/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00454-ADA

ORDER RESETTING TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

 The Court hereby sets and directs the parties, or counsel acting on their behalf, to appear by

phone for a telephone conference on September 18, 2020 at 03:00 PM . Please call (866) 434-5269

with access code 9678090 to be included in the hearing. 

 SIGNED on 17th day of September, 2020.

______________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 25 Filed 09/17/20 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25850]

[[Page 60183]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. MT00-18-000]

Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

October 3, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised 
tariff sheet, with an effective date of September 29, 2000:

Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 187
    Williston Basin states that it is filing the proposed revision to 
its Tariff to reflect changes to the titles of two officers and/or 
board members currently listed in Section 7.1.1 of the General Terms 
and Conditions of Williston Basin's Tariff. Lester H. Loble was 
recently promoted from General Counsel and Secretary to Vice President, 
General Counsel and Secretary and Warren L. Robinson was promoted from 
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer to Executive Vice 
President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-25850 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**




Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
        S-3 No. 333-140840) of Newcastle Investment Corp. and in the related Prospectus
        of our reports dated February 22, 2007, with respect to the consolidated
        financial statements of Newcastle Investment Corp., Newcastle Investment
        Corp.
        management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
        reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
        of
        Newcastle Investment Corp., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
        the
        year ended December 31, 2006.
   /s/
        Ernst
& Young
  New
        York,
        NY
 February
        22, 2007
#### Erwin Clapp, Respondent, v Eastern Rock Products, Inc., Defendant, and Koppers Company, Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Special Term erred in denying defendant Hoppers’ motion for summary judgment. Hoppers is not an "owner” or "contractor” within the meaning of Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6). Plaintiff was injured when he fell from an elevated walkway while engaged in the installation of a conveyer belt at the plant owned by his employer, defendant Eastern Rock Products, Inc. Eastern *903Rock Products is a wholly owned subsidiary of defendant Hoppers Company, Inc. Plaintiff predicates Hoppers’ liability on the grounds that it violated Labor Law §§ 240 and 241. Plaintiff asserts that Hoppers was either an owner or a contractor within the meaning of those sections. It is uncontroverted, however, that Hoppers is not an owner. Eastern Rock owned both the land and building where the accident occurred. On appeal plaintiff contends that a question of fact exists whether Hoppers is a contractor within the meaning of these sections. We disagree.

No contract existed between defendant Eastern Rock and defendant Hoppers for Hoppers to undertake this construction project or to hire subcontractors for the project. Further, there is no evidence that Hoppers was obligated by any contract, either expressed or implied, to coordinate or supervise the various trades on the construction project, or to provide a safe workplace *(see, Kenny v Fuller Co.,*87 AD2d 183, 188-190). Indeed, the record does not show that there were any contractors involved in this project but, rather, shows that the work was performed solely by employees of Eastern Rock. Since Hoppers had no contract to supervise or coordinate the construction project, it cannot be deemed a “contractor” within the meaning of Labor Law §§ 240 and 241 *(cf., Kenny v Fuller Co., supra).*Further, the mere facts that, as part of Hoppers’ interrelationship with its subsidiary, it approved the capital expenditures for the construction project and provided general safety information to its subsidiary, do not raise a triable issue on the question of whether it is a contractor within the meaning of these sections. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Grow, J.—summary judgment.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5597 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on C1–3 Perfluoroalkyl 

perfluoromorpholine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. ELLISON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on C1–3 

Perfluoroalkyl perfluoromorpholine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. C1–3 PERFLUOROALKYL 

4 PERFLUOROMORPHOLINE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.89 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 C1–3 Perfluoroalkyl perfluoromorpholine) is amended by 

8 striking the date in the effective period column and insert9 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5597 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4819 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4819

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sound-isolating earphones 
               with multiple balanced armature speakers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

Ms. Schakowsky introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sound-isolating earphones 
               with multiple balanced armature speakers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SOUND-ISOLATING EARPHONES WITH MULTIPLE BALANCED 
              ARMATURE SPEAKERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Sound-isolating     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          earphones with                                                    12/31/2015
                          multiple balanced
                          armature
                          speakers, each
                          with non-porous
                          slow-recovery
                          black foam
                          attachment
                          sleeves,
                          detachable cable,
                          and with a
                          repeatable
                          frequency
                          response of 18 Hz
                          or more but not
                          over 19 kHz with
                          a deviation of +/-
                           3dB (provided
                          for in subheading
                          8518.30.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Randgold Resources Limited (the“Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Graham P. Shuttleworth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Graham P. Shuttleworth                 

Graham P. Shuttleworth 

Chief Financial Officer 

March 30, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          35,846
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     67,180
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         231,319
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           227,385
<LOANS>                                        364,713
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 739,902
<DEPOSITS>                                     491,154
<SHORT-TERM>                                   104,596
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             42,567
<LONG-TERM>                                     43,596
<COMMON>                                         6,497
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,651
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 739,902
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 23,828
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               15,174
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   438
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                39,440
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,574
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,356
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           25,084
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,234
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 19,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,490
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,046
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.49
<LOANS-NON>                                        503
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,623
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    515
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,136
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      319
<RECOVERIES>                                       182
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,233
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,233
        

</TABLE>
#### CASWELL v. STATE.

No. 24057.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 26, 1948.

No attorney for appellant.

*567Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated. The punishment assessed is a fine of Fifty Dollars.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The •complaint and information seem to be in due form. Consequently, there is nothing presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5589 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5589

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Yellow 241.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Yellow 241.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPERSE YELLOW 241.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      (3-                 Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        Pyridinecarbonitr                                                  31/2015.......
                        ile,5-[2-(3,4-
                        dichlorophenyl)di
                        azenyl]-1,2-
                        dihydro-6-hydroxy-
                        1,4-dimethyl-2-
                        oxo-) (Disperse
                        Yellow 241) (CAS
                        No. 83249-52-9)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3204.11.35)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

I, Michael D. Mulholland, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K/A of CytoDyn Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

Date:September 28, 2018 

 
/s/ Michael D. Mulholland
Michael D. Mulholland

Chief FinancialOfficer
**
PROPOSAL UNDER THE 

SMALL 

COMMUNITY 

AIR 

SERVICE 

DEVELOPMENT 

PROGRAM

ARCATA/EUREKA 

AIRPORT

Page 1

SUMMARY INFORMATION

A. Applicant Information: 

(Check all that apply)

X

Not a 

Consortium

Interstate 

Consortium

Intrastate 

Consortium

Community now receives EAS subsidy

X

Community (or Consortium member) previously 

received a Small Community Grant

If previous recipient, date of grant: 2004; 

Expiration date of grant: September 14, 2006

B. Public/Private Partnerships: 

(List organization names)

Public Private

Humboldt County

Arcata/Eureka Airport

Redwood Region 

Economic Development 

Commission

C. Project Proposal: 

(Check all that apply)

X Marketing X Start-Up Cost 

Offset

Travel Bank X Secure Additional 

Service

Surface 

Transportation X New Route

X Launch New Carrier Subsidy

Study X Revenue 

Guarantee

Upgrade Aircraft First Service

Service Restoration Other (specify): Regional Service

D. Existing Landing Aids at Local Airport:

X Full ILS X Published Instrument Approach

X Localizer X Outer/Middle Marker

X Other (specify): GPS

E. Project Cost:

Line Description

Sub 

Total

Total 

Amount

1 Federal amount 

requested $480,000

2 State cash financial 

contribution $0

Local cash financial 

contribution

3a. Airport cash funds $5,000

3b. Non-airport cash

funds $69,220

3 Total local cash funds 

(3a+3b) $74,220

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING 

(1+2+3) $554,220

In-Kind contribution

5a. Airport In-Kind 

contribution ** $37,545

5b. Other In-Kind 

contribution** $73,800

5

TOTAL IN-KIND 

CONTRIBUTION 

(5a+5b)

$111,345

6 TOTAL PROJECT 

COST (4+5) $665,565

F. In-Kind Contributions**:

For funds in lines 5a (Airport In-Kind contribution) and 5b 

(Other In-Kind contribution), please describe the source(s) of 

fund(s) for each.

Airport: Landing fee waiver; program administration

Other: Marketing; program administration

G. Is this application 

subject to review by 

State under Executive 

Order 12372 process?

c. Program is not 

covered by E.O. 

12372.

H. Is the Applicant 

delinquent on any 

Federal debt? (if “yes”, 

provide explanation)

X No

X
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Certification of
Periodic Financial Report

Jae Whan Yoo and Lonny D. Robinson hereby certify as follows:

1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Center Financial Corporation.

2. The Form 10-K of Center Financial Corporation for the Year Ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Center Financial Corporation.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                                                                   
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: February 22, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Jae Whan Yoo                                                                                  
|                         |  |  |  | Jae Whan Yoo President & Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                    
|                         |  | 
|Dated: February 22, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Lonny D. Robinson                                                                             
|                         |  |  |  | Lonny D. Robinson Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 198 (Thursday, October 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26098]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for 
October 19, 2000, at 10 a.m., in the Commission's offices at the 
National Building Museum (Pension Building), Suite 312, Judiciary 
Square, 441 F Street, NW., Washington, DC, 20001-2728. Items of 
discussion will include designs for projects affecting the appearance 
of Washington, DC, including buildings and parks.
    Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or 
oral statements should be addressed to Charles H. Atherton, Secretary, 
Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address or call 202-504-2200. 
Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing 
impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the 
meeting date.

    Dated in Washington, DC, October 2, 2000.
Charles H. Atherton,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26098 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M