alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00454-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00455-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00455-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00456-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00457-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00458-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00459-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00460-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00461-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00462-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00463-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00464-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00465-ADA

JOINT MOTION TO ENTER FIRST AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s November 10, 2020 Order, the Parties jointly move to amend the 

scheduling ordering in accordance with Version 3.2 of the Court’s Order Governing Proceeding 

entered November 5, 2020. The Parties have adopted the Markman briefing format in OGP 3.2 in

the Proposed First Amended Scheduling Order attached as Exhibit A. 

Date: November 20, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge 

Texas Bar No. 24059147 

Ryan S. Loveless 

Texas Bar No. 24036997 

Brett A. Mangrum 

Texas Bar No. 24065671 

Travis L. Richins 

Texas Bar No. 24061296 

Jeff Huang 

Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 35 Filed 11/20/20 Page 1 of 3
Etheridge Law Group, PLLC 

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324 

Southlake, TX 76092 

Tel.: (817) 470-7249 

Fax: (817) 887-5950 

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Jeff@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

/s/ Irene Yang (with permission)

Barry K. Shelton 

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620 S, Suite 205

Austin, TX 78734

Telephone: (512) 263-2165

Fax: (512) 263-2166

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

Of Counsel

Michael J. Bettinger

Irene Yang

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

555 California St., Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 772-1200

Fax: (415) 772-7400

mbettinger@sidley.com 

irene.yang@sidley.com 

Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 35 Filed 11/20/20 Page 2 of 3
Richard A. Cederoth

John W. McBride

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

1 South Dearborn St.

Chicago, IL 60603

Telephone: (312) 853-7000

Fax: (312) 853-7036

rcederoth@sidley.com 

jwmcbride@sidley.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Microsoft Corporation

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered electronically 

via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, on November 

20, 2020.

/s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge 

Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 35 Filed 11/20/20 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 15.1













CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







Randgold Resources Limited





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statements filed on Form S-8 (File No. 333-156150; No. 333-145013 and No. 333-103222) of our report dated March
30, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
of Randgold Resources Limited and its subsidiaries which appear in this Form 20-F. We also consent to the incorporation by reference
of our report dated March 30, 2015 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 20-F.











/s/ BDO LLP





BDO LLP

Registered Auditor

London

United Kingdom



30 March 2015



BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England
and Wales (with registered number OC305127).
### Jackson-Madiso n Count y Airpor t Authorit y .;(\/jj?f^^ll^lPiSl|^i^sil ? Novembe r15 , 201 1 Denni s DeVany , Chie f Essentia l Ai rServic e Divisio n Departmen t o f Transportatio n Wasiiington , D

C 2059 0 RE : DOT-OST-2000-785 7 Dea rMr . DeVany : Th e Jacl<so n Madiso n CountyAirpor t Authorit yappreciate s th e opportunit yt o submi t comment s regardin g Essentia l Ai rService fo rJackso n Tennessee . W e as k tha t Seapor

t Airline s b e chose n a

s th e carrie rfo rJackso n Tennessee . Seapor t propose d 3 option s fo rservic e i n Jackson . Th e Airpor t Authorit yfeel s tha t optio n # 2 give s Jackso n mor e opportunit yt o lowe rth e passenge rca p b yallowin g tw o hu b choice s fo rtravelers . Th e proposa l provide s fo r1 8 flight s pe rwee k wit h 6 roun d trip s t o Memphi s an d 1 2 roun d trip s t o Nashville . Th e optio n t o fl yt o Memphi s allow s traveler' s acces s t o Delt a Airline s an d th e optio n t o Nashvill e provide s access t o Southwes t Airlines . Th e Authorit yi s awar e tha t th e agreemen t fo rservic e wil l b e fo ronl yon e yea ran d th e abilit yt o increas e traffi c wil l b e critica l t o retainin g service . Thank s fo rconsiderin g ou rcomments . fiv e Smit h Jackson-Madiso n CountyAirpor t Authorit y

30 8 Grad yMontgomer

yDriv e • Jackson , Tennesse e 3830 1 • Phone : 731-423-099 5 • Fax : 731-423-099 7
EXHIBIT 99.1



                          [BANK OF NEW YORK LETTERHEAD]

                                BANK OF NEW YORK

                              Officer's Certificate
                              ---------------------

                                 March 28, 2003



MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC.
North Tower, 7th Floor
4 World Financial Center
New York, New York 10080

                   PREFERREDPLUS AND PPLUS TRUST CERTIFICATES

The undersigned, Kevin Cremin, Vice-President-Business Manager of The Bank of
New York, a New York corporation (the "Trustee"), hereby certifies in such
capacity that, based on his/her knowledge, the Trustee is in compliance with all
conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the Standard Terms for
Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill Lynch Depositor Inc. as
depositor (the "Depositor") and the Trustee, as successor to United States Trust
Company of New York, as trustee and securities intermediary (the "Securities
Intermediary"), in each case as amended by a series supplement between the
Depositor, the Trustee and the Securities Intermediary for each series of trust
certificates listed in the attached schedule.


                                       1
<PAGE>




                                                  Very truly yours,

                                                  BANK OF NEW YORK
                                                  not in its individual capacity
                                                  but as Trustee


                                                  By: /s/ Kevin Cremin
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                  Name: Kevin Cremin
                                                  Title:  Vice President



                                       2
<PAGE>


                                    SCHEDULE

Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 IBM Z-2 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 H-Z3 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 F-Z4 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 TRV-C1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 HLT-1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1999 REN-C1 Trust
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CCR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ATT-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series NAI-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series MSD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series UPC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FAR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GRC-1
PPLUS Trust Series PMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series VAL-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-1


                                        3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 16-0122

LAZO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., W&R

TECHNOLOGY LLC D/B/A ATS

SOUTH D/B/A ADVANCED

TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS SOUTH

AND EDDIE HILL D/B/A HILL

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

v.

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,

GARRETT GOETERS, DAN

WAMPLER, SHEARRARD THOMAS

AND DOES 1-5

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

April 22, 2016

Petitioners' petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having

been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that

the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the

case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under

the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioners, LAZO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., W&R TECHNOLOGY

LLC D/B/A ATS SOUTH D/B/A ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS SOUTH AND

EDDIE HILL D/B/A HILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, pay all costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the

2nd day of June, 2016.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC.,

EMC CORPORATION, VMWARE, INC.

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00480-ADA

ORDER SETTING Pretrial PRETRIAL Conference CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is Set set for

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE in District Courtroom #1, on the Third Floor of the United States

Courthouse, 800 Franklin Ave, Waco, TX, on Thursday, February 02, 2023 at 09:00 AM. All

parties and counsel must appear at this hearing.

Waco

28th day of December, 2022.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA-DTG Document 276 Filed 12/28/22 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|California Onshore Natural Gas Processed in California (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|California Onshore Natural Gas Processed in California (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 180,648 | 156,485 | 150,658 | 147,716 | 143,732 | 119,326 | 99,870 | 91,490 | 85,674
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 78,421 | 72,327  | 69,460  |         |         |         |         |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT A

Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/08/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/08/21 Page 3 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/08/21 Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

 

v. Case No.: 6:20-cv-00474-ADA 

 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ET AL 

ORDER 

BE IT REMEMBERED on this day, there was presented to the Court the Motion for Admission 

Pro Hac Vice filed by Emily M. Whitcher (“Applicant”), counsel for Dell Inc., Dell Technologies 

Inc., EMC Corporation, and the Court, having reviewed the motion, enters the following order: 

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED, and Applicant 

may appear on behalf of Dell Inc., Dell Technologies Inc., EMC Corporation in the above case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately 

tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local 

Court Rule AT-1(f)(2). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the corresponding Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice was 

e-filed, the attorney who filed the Motion on behalf of the Applicant is directed to notify the Applicant 

of this order. 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Applicant, pursuant to the Administrative Policies and 

Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal cases in the Western District of Texas, shall 

register as a filing user within 10 days of the date of this Order, if he/she has not previously done so on 

a prior case in this District. 

SIGNED this the 17th day of September, 2021. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 106 Filed 09/17/21 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Hewitt, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J.), rendered on April 17, 1987, convicting defendant of criminal sale of controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of six years to life, is unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that court and by submitting such application to the clerk of that court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350) I, Robert J. Sprowls, Chief Financial Officer of American States Water Company
and Southern California Water Company (the Registrant), do hereby certify,
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350),
that, to my knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant. /s/ Robert J. Sprowls Robert J. Sprowls
Chief Financial Officer Date: August 9, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4978 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4978

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to remove the maximum payment 
    amount for certain qualified losses under the Traumatic Injury 
   Protection under the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

   Mr. Baca introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to remove the maximum payment 
    amount for certain qualified losses under the Traumatic Injury 
   Protection under the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF MAXIMUM PAYMENT AMOUNTS FOR CERTAIN QUALIFIED 
              LOSSES UNDER TRAUMATIC INJURY PROTECTION UNDER 
              SERVICEMEMBERS' GROUP LIFE INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 1980A(d) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and the maximum 
        payment'' and inserting ``and, except as provided by paragraph 
        (3)(A), the maximum''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3)(A) The maximum payment amount described in paragraph (1) 
shall not apply to a qualifying loss directly caused by a traumatic 
event described in subparagraph (B). The Secretary shall determine the 
payment schedule for such qualifying losses as the Secretary determines 
appropriate without regard to such maximum payment amount.
    ``(B) A traumatic event described in this subparagraph is one of 
the following:
            ``(i) Armed conflict.
            ``(ii) Training under conditions simulating armed conflict.
            ``(iii) Hazardous service.
            ``(iv) A traumatic event caused through an instrumentality 
        of war.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 27

Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 103-3 Filed 08/20/21 Page 1 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 103-3 Filed 08/20/21 Page 2 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 103-3 Filed 08/20/21 Page 3 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 103-3 Filed 08/20/21 Page 4 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 103-3 Filed 08/20/21 Page 5 of 5
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                              EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN
                    COMMUNITY FINANCIAL HOLDING COMPANY, INC.


A non-discretionary Executive Bonus Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors
on January 15, 2004. The plan was created to promote the interest of the Bank
and the Company by providing additional incentives for executive management who
contribute to the growth, profitability and improvement in the operations
results of the Company. The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors.

The Plan places emphasis on meeting and exceeding strategic objectives of the
company. It provides for certain benchmarks to be obtained in order for the
executives to be eligible for the bonus program. These benchmarks include: an
earnings threshold and maintaining satisfactory levels of performance as
determined by our regulatory authorities.

The bonus percentage is based on three levels of attainment: threshold, meet and
exceed. The CEO can reach a maximum bonus of 35% of base salary if all goals are
exceeded. The other executives can achieve a maximum of 25% of base salary if
all goals are exceeded.

The goals are set annually by the Board of Directors once the Strategic Plan for
the bank has been approved. The Bonus Program will generally contain income and
growth targets which are based on a budget and the Strategic Plan and strategic
objectives which must be accomplished. Each component has a weight factor set by
the Board of Directors annually which places emphasis of the Company's strategic
plan.

The bonus is paid to the executive within 115 days of each fiscal year end. The
timing allows for the financial statements of the Company to be audited by the
independent auditors.
----

Action brought on 10 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-79/06)

(2006/C 86/30)

Language of the case: French

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 10 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by M. Heller, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The French Republic should have initiated, immediately after the Court's judgment, the necessary legislative process and adopted the appropriate amendments to comply with Directive 90/219/EEC.

Hitherto the amendments necessary at both the legislative and regulatory levels have still not been adopted, 14 years, and even ten and seven years respectively after the expiry of the period for compliance and more than two years after the Court's declaration of the failure to fulfil obligations.

----

(1)  [2003] ECR I-14355.

(2)  Council Directive 90/219/EEC of 23 April 1990 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms ‘GMMO’ (OJ 1990 L 117, p. 1).

----
#### WHIDDON v. STATE.

No. 26869.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 3, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted as a second offender for the offense of unlawfully operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and upon his plea of guilty to the court, he was fined the sum of $250.

All matters of procedure appear to he regular. The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence thereof, no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.