alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 3)) 

# AERIAL

U.S. Department ofTransportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 

### Application to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 11193 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0872 7 March2016 Petitioner: 3D Aerial Solutions, LLC BretGivens, PMP, President 4725 Constitutional Court Dayton, OH 45440 (937) 510-6836 [office] (937) 620-5359 (cell] bgivens@3daerial.com website: www.3daerial.com
Dear Sir or Madam: ,. : ' ,·' '' ;**~** .· ;,


# - '**~-**

:,.,- . "'. '.... "

By lerler from the FAA dated 4 March 2015, an exemption was granted to 3DAerial for relief under Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 ExemptionNo. 11193 Docket No. FAA-2014-0872.
. . ·::

.. _

... .I !
·-r. •"i.. :-:)
. . './'**~<**

# ·.. "I
. .' ·••**~' ;~-~~:**  . • • :'_; ' ;:_ ' 3DAerial hereby requests that the ·exemption'so graiitea be amended to now further includethe 3D Robotics X8, 3D Robotics Y6, 3D Robotics Solo, SenseFly Exom, DJI Phantom 2 ,DJI Phantom 2+, DJI Phantom 3, DJI Phantom 4, AgEagle, PrecisionHawk, Altavian, 3D Blue, 3D Crimson, 3D Blue Rotor, and Storm Drone AntiGravity. In addition, we request that the PIC qualifications be amended to include holders ofprivate, recreational or sport pilot certificates with applicable medical certificates. Thank you for your consideration ofthis important matter. Please contact us at any time ifyou require additional information or clarification. Sincerely,

President
#### ROBERTS v. STATE.

No. 22936.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 1, 1944.

E. C. Overall, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. ' ’ '

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is murder. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for life.

The record in this case is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears to be in due and legal form. Consequently there is nothing presented for review.

Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enesco Group, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas
F. Bradley, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the
operations of the Company. May 10, 2004
    
    By: /s/ Thomas F. BradleyChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 32
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No. 20-cv-00642

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Western District of Texas

JACK MILLER, ANNABEL CAMPBELL, MATTHEW 

PESINA, LISA PESINA, M.P., a minor, and 

J.G., a minor, CHIEF JOSEPH SALVAGGIO, et al.

Officer Anderson

Leon Valley Police Department

6400 El Verde Road

Leon Valley, TX 78238

Solomon M. Radner, Esq.

Excolo Law, PLLC

26700 Lahser Rd., Suite 401

Southfield, MI 48033

(866) 939-2656

sradner@excololaw.com

Case 5:20-cv-00642-JKP Document 1-4 Filed 05/28/20 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 5:20-cv-00642-JKP Document 1-4 Filed 05/28/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 15




Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, Northwest
Washington, D.C.  20549
Attention:  Document Control

Re:  7-Eleven, Inc. (formerly The Southland Corporation) Form 10-Q

We are aware that our report dated July 22, 1999, on our review of the
condensed consolidated balance sheet of 7-Eleven, Inc. and Subsidiaries as
of June 30, 1999, and the related condensed consolidated statements of
earnings for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 1999 and
1998, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-
month periods ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, included in this Form 10-Q, is
incorporated by reference in the following registration statements:

                                                         REGISTRATION NO.
                                                         ----------------
     On Form S-8 for:

       Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Grant Stock Plan        33-25327

       1995 Stock Incentive Plan                                 33-63617

       Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
            for Eligible Employees                              333-42731

       Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors       333-68491


Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report
should not be considered a part of the registration statement prepared or
certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Dallas, Texas
August 2, 1999




                                     Tab 1
|**EXHIBIT 32.2**
      **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350,**
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**                                                        
|**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**                           

In connection with the Annual Report of MCG Diversified, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof or immediately thereafter
(the "Report"), I, Jay D. Solomon, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, and
Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company

|/s/ JAY D. SOLOMON                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Jay D. Solomon, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal
      Accounting Officer
|March 30, 2004                                                                        

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
to be filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

|
|
Exhibit A 

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 42-1 Filed 02/04/21 Page 1 of 6
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 42-1 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 6
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 42-1 Filed 02/04/21 Page 3 of 6
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 42-1 Filed 02/04/21 Page 4 of 6
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 42-1 Filed 02/04/21 Page 5 of 6
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 42-1 Filed 02/04/21 Page 6 of 6
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 4, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00732

- CR

Gerardo GUTIERREZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR4590 Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez

- Gardner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant attempts to appeal the trial court’s “decision to deny by operation of law his motion requesting appointment of counsel pursuant to article 64, Code of Criminal Procedure.”

See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 64.01(c) (West Supp. 2015).

A trial court’ s denial of a request for appointed counsel to file a postconviction motion for DNA testing is not immediately appealable. Gutierrez v. State, 307 S.W.3d 318, 319, 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). “Such an appea l is premature; a motion for appointed counsel is a preliminary matter that precedes the initiation of Chapter 64 proceedings.” Id. at 323. Thus, it appears that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because there is no final judg m ent or order subject to appeal. See id

. W e therefore ORDER appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction within thirty days from the date of this

order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 43.2(f).

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the jurisdictional issue.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, JusticeIN WITN ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of January, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10c


December 9, 1996


The Standard Products Company
2401 South Gulley Road
Dearborn, Michigan 48124


Attention:  Mr. Charles F. Nagy
            Treasurer


Dear Sir:

The undersigned are the holders of $75,000,000 aggregate principal amount of
the 6.55% Senior Notes due December 16, 2003, as amended (the "Notes"), issued
pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, dated December 16, 1993 (the
"Agreements"), between The Standard Products Company (the "Company") and the
undersigned.

As holders of the Notes and parties to the Agreements, and subject to the
Company's agreement herewith as evidenced by the signature of an authorized
officer of the Company at the foot hereof, Metropolitan hereby agrees with the
Company that Section 8.3 ("Current Ratio") of the Notes shall be amended by
deleting the percentage "one hundred twenty-five percent (125%)" appearing
therein and replacing it with the percentage "one hundred percent (100%)".

It is understood that no compensation has been paid to any other senior lenders
of the Company for agreement to the amendments referred to in this letter and
that all senior lenders have agreed to such amendments.  It is further
understood that if any bank lenders of the Company subsequently increase the
current ratio required by such bank lenders to be maintained by the Company,
the current ratio referred to in Section 8.3 of the Notes shall be raised to
such levels.

If you are in agreement with the foregoing amendment please sign below and
return three of the enclosed copies of this letter to Metropolitan Life
Insurance Company, 334 Madison Avenue, Convent Station, New Jersey 07961-0633,
to the attention of Morian Mooers, whereupon such amendment shall be effective
as of the date first above written.

Very truly yours,


METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE                   METROPOLITAN INSURANCE AND
COMPANY                                       ANNUITY COMPANY
        
By:  /s/ Joe A. Augustini                     By:  /s/ James A. Wiviott
------------------------------------          --------------------------
   Vice President        
                                              METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND
                                              CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
        
                                              By:  /s/ James A. Wiviott
                                              --------------------------
The foregoing amendment to the        
Agreement is accepted and agreed to.        
        
THE STANDARD PRODUCTS COMPANY.        
        
By:  /s/ Charles F. Nagy        
------------------------------------        
     Treasurer
Exhibit 99(b)


                         Independent Accountants' Report
                         -------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Household Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of consumer
automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust 2002-1 has
been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in
compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of
the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated May 15, 2002 (the Agreement), as
supplemented, for the period of May 15, 2002 to December 31, 2002. Household
Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the
servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and
conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Agreement, as supplemented,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has
been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in
compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of
the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated May 15, 2002, as supplemented, for
the period of May 15, 2002 to December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all
material respects.



                                       /s/ KPMG LLP
                                       KPMG LLP

February 28, 2003
Chicago, Illinois
<PAGE>

                              Management Assertion
                              --------------------


For the period of May 15, 2002 to December 31, 2002, the servicing of consumer
automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust 2002-1 has
been conducted by Household Auto Finance, a division of Household Finance
Corporation, in its capacity as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation,
as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in
Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated May 15, 2002,
as supplemented.



/s/ TIM CONDON                              /s/ JOHN O'BRIEN
----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Tim Condon                                  John O'Brien
Chief Financial Officer-                    Group Director- Asset Management-
Household Auto Finance                      Household Auto Finance



February 28, 2003                           February 28, 2003
----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Date                                        Date
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ElderTrust Operating Limited Partnership (the Partnership) for the period ended December
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Debra A. Cafaro, President and Chief Executive Officer of ElderTrust, the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2005                                           
|                                                               
|/s/ Debra A. Cafaro                                            
|Debra A. Cafaro                                                
|President and Chief Executive Officer of ElderTrust,           
|the General Partner of ElderTrust Operating Limited Partnership



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.A
 
 
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, of Southern Natural Gas Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Norman G. Holmes, President, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
   
 /s/ Norman G. HolmesNorman G. HolmesPresident(Principal Executive Officer)Southern Natural Gas CompanyAugust 6, 2010
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Southern Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
PASTIFICIO LUCIO GAROFALO, S.P.A. Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee,

and

AMERICAN ITALIAN PASTA COMPANY, DAKOTA GROWERS PASTA COMPANY,

and NEW WORLD PASTA COMPANY

, Defendants-Appellees,

____________________

2011-1533

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in consolidated Case Nos. 10-CV-0095 and 10-CV-0097, Judge Donald C. Pogue.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

R ICHARD P. F ERRIN , Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was D OUGLAS J. H EFFNER

.

C ARRIE A. D UNSMORE , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. With her on the brief were T ONY W EST , Assistant Attorney General, J EANNEE. D AVIDSON , Director, and R EGINALD T. B LADES , J R ., Assistant Director.

D AVID C. S MITH , J R ., Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee American Italian Pasta Company, et al. With him on the brief was P AUL C. R OSENTHAL

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , M AYER , and D YK , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 14, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
|                                                                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                                 
|Louisiana - North Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                                 
|Louisiana - North Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,837  | 5,738  | 6,091  | 2,800 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5,118  | 3,864  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023