alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**RB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0066 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL JOSEPH MCCOY ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including April 6 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 4 2021

03/04/2021
Case Number: DA 20-0066
### Fw: Follow-up calls on SO2 NAAQS--need some help understanding what we're doing on Thursday Michael Stewart to: Tricia Crabtree 05/03/2010 01:56 PM Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D. Environmental Protection Specialist Health and Environmental Impacts Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 (919) 541-7524 stewart.michael@epa.gov ----- Forwarded by Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US on 05/03/2010 01:56 PM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US To: Richard Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi

_ R.

_ King@omb.eop.gov>, Heidi King <hking@omb.eop.gov>, James Hemby/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Mathias/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/03/2010 01:47 PM Subject: RE: Follow-up calls on SO2 NAAQS--need some help understanding what we're doing on Thursday Either way is fine with me, as I plan to attend both meetings. It seems to me that it would make sense to have everyone on the first call, and begin discussion of the monitoring, etc. issues once we complete the standard discussion, which I don't believe will take too long, and then have the second hour to discuss whatever we don't get to in the first meeting. I think because the standard discussion should be relatively short in this meeting, it makes sense to have the whole team on the phone and get through as much of the package as we can in the first meeting, and have the second to complete the discussion if need be. Then, in subsequent meetings, where we anticipate a fuller discussion of NAAQS issues, we can have separate meetings on monitoring and modeling, as need be. Does that make sense to you? Richard Wayland 05/03/2010 01:39:29 PM I had assumed the first was on the standard and...
From: Richard Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi

_ R.

_ King@omb.eop.gov>, Heidi King <hking@omb.eop.gov>, James Hemby/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Mathias/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/03/2010 01:39 PM Subject: RE: Follow-up calls on SO2 NAAQS--need some help understanding what we're doing on Thursday I had assumed the first was on the standard and the second on the implementation, which covers the monitoring/modeling. Whatever works best, but when we try and do all together, we never get time for the implementation side, so that's why we proposed 2 separate meetings. Plus, we would not have to have all the implementation folks on the first call if we're focusing just on the standard. Hoping to maximize folks time as well. Chet

_

______________________________________ _ Richard A. "Chet" Wayland Director, Air Quality Assessment Division U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards (919) 541-4603 Lydia Wegman 05/03/2010 01:35:16 PM I need some clarification of what we're doing on... Richard Wayland 05/03/2010 12:30:38 PM Great! We'll set it up for 2pm Thursday. ______..."King, Heidi R." 05/03/2010 12:13:41 PM 2pm sounds pretty good! heidi
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        614,364
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 160,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                   217,354
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,256,689
<PP&E>                                      5,343,541
<DEPRECIATION>                              2,108,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              6,923,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       6,152,382
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      272,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,730,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                6,923,409
<SALES>                                       281,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,993,956
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,820,395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            312,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,867,202)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,867,202)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,867,202)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)



</TABLE>
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT

CASE NUMBER: P03-0633

RELATED CASES:

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 1 3

KEYWORDS:

AQUATOX-C

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT

FATE: Solid LogKow = 7.97(E); S (mg/L, 25 E C) < 0.001(E); H < 1.00E-8(E)
MP (C) = 82-84(M); BP (C) > 400(E); VP @ 25C (mm) < 1.0E-6(E) LogKoc = 5.72(E); LogBCF = 1.98(E); POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption & part biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk

PBT Potential: P1B1T1 Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

HEALTH: Absorption is nil through the skin based on physical/chemical properties and poor through the lungs and GI tract based on analogs. No significant health concerns. *CEB HEALTH: Low concern (No exposures needed).

TOXICITY DATA: negative in Salmonella and E coli, study used an inadequate protocol with only one plate per dose level acute oral study in rats - no deaths or signs of toxicity at 500 or 2000 mg/kg

not a skin irritant

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) are:

fish 96-h LC50 = * P daphnid 48-h LC50 = * P green algal 96-h EC50 = * P
fish 30-d ChV = 0.001 or * P daphnid ChV = 0.001 or * P algal ChV = 0.002 or * P Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical class = ; MW362; log Kow = 8.3 (ClogP), 8.0 (EPI); solid with mp = 83 C and S <0.001 to 0.001 mg/L at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measuredconcentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; high concern for toxicity;

assessment factor = 10.0 concern concentration = 0.001 mg/L (ppm) or *
*CEB ECOTOX: All releases to water;

Becky Jones 564-8919
GMAC

Commercial Mortgage

 

 

Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance

                                           With Minimum Servicing Standards

March 17, 2003

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation has complied in all material respects, with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the company's minimum servicing standards (Exhibit A), which were derived from the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers.

As of December 31, 2002, the company was covered by various General Motors Corporation insurance policies providing for $400 million of fidelity bond insurance and $400 million of errors and omissions insurance.

 

Robert D. Feller

Robert D. Feller

Chief Executive Officer

 

Wayne D.  Hoch

Wayne D.  Hoch

Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
*Michael I. Lipson

Michael I. Lipson

Executive Vice President, Global Servicing

 

200 Witmer Road P.O. Box 1015 Horsham, PA 19044 8015*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
-0260 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DANIELLE WOOD,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 9, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 4 2022

04/04/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0260
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5127 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5127

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on coarse yttrium 
                            oxide phosphor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Huelskamp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on coarse yttrium 
                            oxide phosphor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COARSE YTTRIUM OXIDE PHOSPHOR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.63 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to coarse yttrium oxide 
phosphor) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Yttrium oxide phosphor, activated by 
        europium of a kind'' in the article description column and 
        inserting ``Coarse yttrium oxide phosphor with a median 
        particle size greater than 4.9 microns, containing between 4.5 
        and 5.9 percent by weight of europium,''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                          90,445
<SECURITIES>                                     1,003
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                       400
<INVENTORY>                                     16,294
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               141,258
<PP&E>                                         107,842
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,542
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,671
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,546
<SALES>                                         38,219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,219
<CGS>                                           22,480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,614
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (80)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  60
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,851
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,424
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,419
<DISCONTINUED>                                   4,765
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,184
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 29

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 71-3 Filed 02/05/21 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

XILINX, INC., 

Defendant. 

C.A. No. 20-1228-CFC 

C.A. No. 20-1229-CFC 

C.A. No. 20-1231-CFC 

C.A. No. 20-1232-CFC 

C.A. No. 20-1233-CFC 

DECLARATION OF STUART A. SHANUS IN SUPPORT OF 

PLAINTIFF WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC 

d/b/a BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT’S 

OPPOSITION TO XILINX, INC.’S MOTION TO TRANSFER 

I, Stuart A. Shanus, hereby declare and state as follows: 

1. I currently serve as President of WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a 

Brazos Licensing and Development (“WSOU”), in Waco, Texas. I have been 

President of WSOU since in or about August 2017. 

2. I submit this Declaration in Support of WSOU’s Opposition to 

Defendant Xilinx, Inc.’s (“Xilinx”) Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1404. The statements set forth below are true and correct to the best of 

my knowledge and belief based upon information available to WSOU and, if called 

to do so, I could and would testify competently as to the same. 

Case 1:20-cv-01228-CFC Document 24 Filed 01/20/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1349 Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 71-3 Filed 02/05/21 Page 2 of 4
2 

3. WSOU is a limited liability company that is incorporated in Delaware. 

WSOU has been incorporated in Delaware since July 2017. WSOU’s principal 

place of business is located at 605 Austin Avenue, Suite 6, Waco, Texas 76701. 

4. WSOU is the assignee of all right, title, and interest in U.S. Patent 

Nos. 6,784,653, 7,068,950, 7,613,938, 7,903,971, and 9,312,838 (collectively, 

“Patents-in-Suit”). 

5. WSOU’s documents concerning the Patents-in-Suit and its business 

operations are located in or accessible from its Waco office as well as the office of 

WSOU’s vendor, Network Consultants, located at 703 Willow Grove Road, Waco, 

Texas 76712. 

6. The WSOU representatives most knowledgeable about WSOU’s 

licensing practices include Craig Etchegoyen and me. He and I are willing to 

appear for trial in Wilmington, Delaware. 

7. WSOU does not maintain any offices, facilities, or employees in the 

Northern District of California. 

I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States 

of America that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, 

information, and belief, formed after reasonable inquiry under the circumstances. 

Executed on the 20th day of January, 2021. 

Case 1:20-cv-01228-CFC Document 24 Filed 01/20/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1350 Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 71-3 Filed 02/05/21 Page 3 of 4
3 

Case 1:20-cv-01228-CFC Document 24 Filed 01/20/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1351 Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 71-3 Filed 02/05/21 Page 4 of 4
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

l1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

138209(44)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138209 COA: 280127 Macomb CC: 07-001571-FC KIP C. SCHMIDT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s June 12, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, becau se it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

K ELLY 

### , C.J., would grant reconsideration a nd, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5342 

To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphonic acid, maleic anhydride sodium 

salt complex. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphonic acid, maleic 

anhydride sodium salt complex. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHONIC ACID, MALEIC ANHYDRIDE SO4 DIUM SALT COMPLEX. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5342 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Phosphonic acid, maleic 

anhydride sodium salt 

complex (CAS No. 

180513–31–9) (provided 

for in subheading 

3824.90.92) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
June 25, 2015

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0111

Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mailcode: 2822T

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

To Whom It May Concern: 

My name is Abby Bertz, I live in Mayview, Missouri and I am a member of the FFA, where I currently 

serve as Area VI President. Today, we have heard previous panels speak a lot about sons coming back 

to the farm, but it is also important to remember the financially healthy farms bringing daughters back as 

well. I am speaking in support of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and I hope you will consider my 

comments when making your decision. 

We need a renewable replacement to fossil fuels that will keep our economy standing strong and 

protect the family budget. The ethanol industry supports the consumer, industrial manufacturing, grain 

producers, transporters, and companies leading technological advancements to further prove and 

enhance this renewable fuel. For every 100 million gallons produced, two thousand jobs are created. 

According to the Energy Future Coalition, the US saw a $16.8 billion economic impact in our nation's 

Gross Domestic Product due solely to the production of ethanol.

As a child of parents that both contribute to ethanol, grain and livestock industries, I see firsthand the jobs the industry supports. If our country’s families can find jobs within the industry and take 

advantage of the cost effective resource, we in turn see economic relief and economic expansion due to 

higher disposable income, ultimately saving consumers.

The benefits of ethanol span further than the economy, it also includes a positive impact on our 

environment. With a society that seems to understand the value of sustaining our planet, it is interesting 

that the idea of gasoline alternatives aiding in environmental progress is often overlooked. Ethanol 

serves as a high octane, high performance fuel emitting 51% fewer greenhouse gases than gasoline, 

and 34% fewer carbon dioxide emissions, as studied by the Renewable Fuels Association. With ethanol 

we can breathe easier knowing we are using a cleaner, high performing fuel.

In today’s society, we are all looking for better alternatives and technologies. With a reliable, 

renewable, raw material source grown in every state, ethanol is an efficient Made in the USA product. I 

firmly believe in a product that supports our local growers, continues to decrease fuel costs, is 

environmentally friendly and supports job growth. An industry that supports us all is one to embrace. I 

strongly support a stable RFS and ask that you change the final proposal to comply with the 

existing law. The RFS works for America - and American families. 

Sincerely,

Abby Bertz

Abby Bertz

12113 Prairie Valley Road

Mayview, MO 64071
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|Ohio Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Ohio Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 84     | 62     | 2      | 0      | 0      | 7      | 83     | 0      | 32     | 78    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 185    | 4      | 71     | 0      | 35     | 1,229  | 0      | 2,883  | 7,198  | 8,183 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,598  | 349    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023