alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|New Mexico--West Nonassociated Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|New Mexico--West Nonassociated Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,611  | 1,464  | 1,515  | 2,137 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,289  | 2,546  | 2,827  | 3,182  | 3,556  | 3,456  | 3,146  | 3,070  | 3,234  | 2,727 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,379  | 2,093  | 1,345  | 935    | 899    | 2,351  | 491    | 1,252  | W      | 1,318 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,217  | 2,109  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### In the Matter of David B., a Person Alleged to be in Need of Supervision.

(Appeal No. 4.)

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings. Same memorandum as in *Matter of David B.*([appeal No. 1] 167 AD2d 885 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, O’Donnell, J.—PINS.) Present—Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5401 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5401

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Zeta-cypermethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Ms. Hochul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Zeta-cypermethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ZETA-CYPERMETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.58 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Zeta-cypermethrin) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 198 (Thursday, October 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26131]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-20-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 5, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 2, 2000, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the 
filing, with an effective of November 1, 2000.
    Tennessee states that the purpose of this filing is to revise its 
tariff in order to modify the applicability of the right of first 
refusal as directed by the Commission in Order Nos. 637, 637-A, and 
637-B.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26131 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31(1)

                         CERTIFICATION
I, James W. Keyes, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, of 7-Eleven, Inc. (the
"registrant");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial
information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 7, 2003
/s/ James W. Keyes
---------------------------------

President and Chief Executive Officer



                                      Tab 2
#### Bee TUTTLE, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 29, 1954.

Lewis & Weaver and William J. Weaver, London, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

■ PER CURIAM. '

We are affirming the judgment in this case for a fine of $100 and 60 days in jail because we think (1) it was not error for the court to try the appellant in his absence; and (2) there was sufficient com? petent evidence showing • .that . Laprel County was local option territory at the time the appellant was. charged with-. the offense of selling whiskey therein.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed. ■ ¡ ■ ■ ,
#### MENDIOLA v. STATE.

No. 26456.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 17, 1953.

*Ruben R.*Lozano, San Antonio, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for murder; the punishment SO years in the penitentiary.

The sole question is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction for murder with malice.

Appellant admittedly fired three shots at close range with a 32-20 caliber pistol aimed at Manuel Pena, the deceased, while Pena was seated in a car. One shot passed through deceased’s chest entering under the armpit.

The jury rejected appellant’s claim of self-defense an'd, finding that the defendant acted with malice, assessed his punishment at SO years.

*The*killing occurred at the *store*and service station of appellant’s father late on Sunday afternoon, appellant and his companions having arrived in a pickup about the time the deceased and his companion stopped at the service station for water for their car. There was no previous acquaintance between appellant and the deceased and his companions. An argument ensued between appellant, seated in his pickup, and the deceased. A witness hearing the argument went into the store and advised appellant’s father of the difficulty. Mendiola, Sr., then armed himself, according to the state’s witnesses with a pistol or, as he testified, with a piece of pipe, and went to the front. He heard his son and the deceased cursing each other and told the deceased to leave.

Appellant got out of his pickup during the argument and was seen by his brother, who was one of his companions, to get the pistol from the glove compartment. The brother asked him not to get the gun and not to shoot the deceased, to which appellant replied that he was taking no chances as he had seen the deceased reach toward the glove compartment of the car he was in.

The deceased and his companions were unarmed. They had been to a beer joint and the deceased and some of those with him had been drinking.

As stated, the jury resolved the issue of self-defense against appellant.

The issue as to whether appellant acted under sudden passion arising from an adequate cause, or with malice, was also resolved against appellant by the jury.

The evidence showing that appellant shot with a pistol and killed the deceased is sufficient to support their finding that he acted with malice aforethought. See Harvey v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 332, 201 S.W.2d 42; Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 216 S.W.2d 226.

The judgment is affirmed.
Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (PL 92-463) that the Boston Harbor Islands Advisory Council will meet on Thursday, March 2, 2000. The meeting will convene at 6:00 PM at the University Club, University of Massachusetts, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Healey Library, 11th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts.

The Advisory Council was appointed by the Director of National Park Service pursuant to Public Law 104-333. The 28 members represent business, educational, cultural, and environmental entities; municipalities surrounding Boston Harbor; and Native American interests. The purpose of the Council is to advise and make recommendations to the Boston Harbor Islands Partnership with respect to the development and implementation of a management plan and the operation of the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area.

The Agenda for this meeting is as follows:

1. Approval of minutes from February 10, 2000

                    2. Present and review annual report                    Start Printed Page 5889

3. Nomination for Advisory Council seats.

4. Election of officers

5. Discussion on the draft General Management Plan

The meeting is open to the public. Further information concerning Council meetings may be obtained from the Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the Council or file written statements. Such requests should be made at least seven days prior to the meeting to: Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA, 408 Atlantic Ave., Boston, MA, 02110, telephone (617) 223-8667.

Dated: January 24, 2000.

George E. Price, Jr.,

Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA.

[FR Doc. 00-2610 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended on September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and to which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Robert E. Lowder, the
principal executive officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 6, 2008



/s/    ROBERT E.
LOWDERRobert E. Lowder Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and will be retained by The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### GHOLSON v. SIMMONS.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

April 30, 1954.

Henry Jack Wilson, Mayfield, for appellant.

• p. B. Martin and Sam Boyd Neely, May-field, for. appellee. .

■'CAMMACK, Justice. '

This is an .appeal from a judgment; on a directed verdict in -favor of Sherrill Simmons, defendant below, in an automobile negligence case. Simmons pleaded that Gholson’s injuries resulted from his own negligence. The Bill of Exceptions was properly stricken, so we have before us only the question of whether the pleadings support the judgment on the directed verdict. We have examined the record and conclude that they do.

The point is made for the appellant that the case shoulil be considered in the light of the Rules of Civil Procedure, which became' effective July 1, 1953. The case was tried prior to July 1, 1953, the appeal having been filed in this Court on April 1 of that year, so in no event would the new Rules be applicable.

. Judgment affirmed.
|                                                                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                                       
|U.S. Federal Offshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                                       
|U.S. Federal Offshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,001  | 1,319  | 693    | 1,723  | 1,021  | 787    | 2,317  | 763    | 672    | 142   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 827    | 266    | 413    | 757    | 235    | 192    | 186    | 8      | 32     | 323   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 95     | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 195 / Friday, October 6, 2000 / Presidential Documents 59699

Presidential Determination No. 2000–33 of September 29, 2000

Military Drawdown for Tunisia

Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Defense

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of

the United States, including Title III (Foreign Military Financing) of the

Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations

Act, 2000, as enacted in Public Law 106–113 (Title III), I hereby direct

the drawdown of defense articles from the stocks of the Department of

Defense, and military education and training of the aggregate value of $4

million for Tunisia, consistent with the authority provided under Title III,

for the purposes of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to report this determination

to the Congress and to publish it in the 

œ–

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, September 29, 2000.

[FR Doc. 00–25961

Filed 10–5–00; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patricia Walker, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Roberts, J.), rendered on April 10, 1989, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and sentencing her, as a predicate felon, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 to 4 years, is unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that court and by submitting such application to the clerk of that court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Milonas, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.