alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Newcastle Investment Corp. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kenneth M. Riis, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Kenneth M. Riis

Kenneth M. Riis

Chief Executive Officer

March 3, 2011

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

AND EMC CORPORATION, 

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00477-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

LETTER OF REQUEST FOR FOREIGN DISCOVERY
1

Defendants Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., and EMC Corporation, (collectively 

“Defendants”) seek foreign discovery from third party witnesses residing in Canada. Defendants 

have attached an Appendix with a Letter of Request which includes Document Requests and

Deposition Topics. Defendants respectfully request that the Court execute the Letter of Request

attached as Appendix P. Defendants further request that, after the Court has signed the Letter of 

Request, the Clerk of this Court authenticate the Court’s signature under the seal of this Court, and 

return the original signed and sealed executed Letter, and two certified copies of the signed and 

sealed executed Letters, to Defendants’ counsel, Barry K. Shelton, for delivery to the proper 

authority.

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, indicated 

that it reserves the right to serve its own foreign discovery in the future.

Dated: November 6, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Attorneys for Defendants
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 6, 2020, all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the 

Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Standard Motor Products, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence I. Sills, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Lawrence I. SillsLawrence
      I. SillsChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      7, 2009





*         
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Standard Motor Products, Inc. and will be retained by
Standard Motor Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
CONCRETE
CASTING INCORPORATED




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Concrete Casting Incorporated (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Kevin J. Asher, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
            Kevin
      J. AsherKevin
      J. AsherChief
      Executive Officer
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              Chief
      Accounting OfficerJuly
      31, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Concrete Casting Incorporated and will be retained by Concrete
Casting Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Upstream
Biosciences Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that:

| | (1) | the Transition Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for
      the transition period from January 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006 (the
      Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                              



|Dated: January 4, 2007 | By: */s/ Joel Bellenson*            
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------
|                       | Joel Bellenson                      
|                       | Chief Executive Officer and Director
|                       | (Principal Executive Officer)       



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Upstream
Biosciences Inc. and will be retained by Upstream Biosciences Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name and Committee Code:*                         Advisory Panel for Ecological Studies (                        #                        1751).                    

*Date and Time:*                         October 11, 2000, 8 a.m.-5 p.m. thru October 13, 2000, 8 a.m.-Adjourn.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 375, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Scott L. Collins, Program Officer or Mr. Aaron Kinchen, Program & Technology Analyst, Ecological Studies Cluster, Room 640N, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8481.                    

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals to the National Science Foundation (NSF) for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate proposals submitted in response to the Ecological Studies Ecology Program Solicitation (99-2).                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                     

Dated: October 3, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-25826  Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|No chart available.                                                           
|No chart available.                                                           
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Michigan Shale Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 26281.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 28, 1953.

Louis Graves, Jr., Joe Harris, Houston, for appellant.

William H. Scott; Cr. Dist. Atty. arid King C. Haynie, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., Houston, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The offense is unlawfully carrying a pistol; the punishment, a fine of $250.

Testimony of the state shows that on the morning o.f August 13, 1952, appellant was riding in an automobile along one of the streets in Houston; that he stopped by a lot on which several men were building a fence. Appellant got out and went on the lot where the men were, and the testimony shows that he had a pistol on his person. He later returned with it to the car in the street.

Appellant and his witnesses testified that he was not carrying a pistol.

The issue of guilt was resolved against the appellant by the court.

The informal bills of exception have been examined and are deficient in that they go to the exclusion of testimony, and it is not shown what the answer or answers would have been if given by the witness.

The evidence is sufficient to support the conviction.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
#### GARLAND v. STATE.

No. 25538.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 5, 1951.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 13, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated, the jury having assessed a $50 fine as punishment.

There are two bills of exception, both relating to the admission of testimony of George M. Knox, one of the arresting officers, as to statements made by appellant which the witness testified followed his detention or arrest.

The testimony complained of in bill No. 1 appears to be identical with that of Officer Truill on the same matter. The latter testimony having been admitted without objection, no reversible error is shown by this bill. See Mershon v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 575, 155 S.W.2d 372.

Bill No. 2 complains that Knox was permitted to testify that he asked appellant if he -had had anything to drink, and that appellant replied, “I have had a few social drinks.”

In the absence of a showing in the bill that the conversation was not part of the res gestae, no error is shown. See Enix v. State, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 106, *299*S.W. 430.

*205The ' State’s testimony shows the guilt of appellant as charged. Appellant offered witnesses as to his good reputation as a law-abiding citizen, but did not testify or offer testimony showing any defense to the charge for which he was on trial. The jury assessed the minimum punishment.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing

MORRISON, Judge.

Appellant urges us to reconsider his bill of exception No. 2 on the grounds that the statement made by appellant to the arresting officer was not a part of the res gestae. We have re-examined the bill and find the only grounds of objection set forth therein to be: “that the oral statements made by the defendant after he had been detained and stopped by the officers were made while under arrest and inadmissible”. It follows that the question of whether the statements were or were not a part of the res gestae was not before the trial court and therefore cannot be raised here.

On the question of statements made at the time of arrest, we recently had this to say in Clifton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 246 S.W.2d 201:

> “However, for the purpose of clarification, it appears that appellant is laboring under the impression that no witness may be allowed to testify as to anything he observed subsequent to the moment of arrest. In this, he is mistaken. It has long been the holding of this Court that, ‘If such acts or declarations were part of the res gestae they are admissible notwithstanding the fact that they may not be admissible as confessions or as admissions, for the rule of res gestae is independent of, superior to and cannot be limited by the rules relating to confessions or admissions after arrest.’ 18 Tex.Juris., Sec. 193, p. 313.”

Remaining convinced that our original disposition of this cause was correct, appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
Section 1350

                             As Adopted Pursuant to

                  Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert Sinnott, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Larrea
            BioSciences Corporation;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
            untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
            necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
            under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
            to the period covered by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
            information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
            material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
            cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
            in this annual report.

      4.    Larrea BioSciences Corporation's other certifying officer and I are
            responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
            procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
            15d-15(e)) for Larrea BioSciences Corporation and, have:

            a.    Have caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
                  designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
                  information relating to Larrea BioSciences is made known to us
                  by others within this entity, particularly during the period
                  in which this report is being prepared; and,

            b.    Evaluated the effectiveness of Larrea BioSciences' disclosure
                  controls and procedures and present in this report our
                  conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
                  and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
                  report, and the date of this report, based on such evaluation.

Date:  August 13, 2004                      /s/Robert Sinnott
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert Sinnott
                                            Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00454-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00455-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00455-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00456-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00457-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00458-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00459-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00460-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00461-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00462-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00463-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00464-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00465-ADA

JOINT MOTION TO ENTER FIRST AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s November 10, 2020 Order, the Parties jointly move to amend the 

scheduling ordering in accordance with Version 3.2 of the Court’s Order Governing Proceeding 

entered November 5, 2020. The Parties have adopted the Markman briefing format in OGP 3.2 in

the Proposed First Amended Scheduling Order attached as Exhibit A. 

Date: November 20, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge 

Texas Bar No. 24059147 

Ryan S. Loveless 

Texas Bar No. 24036997 

Brett A. Mangrum 

Texas Bar No. 24065671 

Travis L. Richins 

Texas Bar No. 24061296 

Jeff Huang 

Case 6:20-cv-00457-ADA Document 34 Filed 11/20/20 Page 1 of 3
Etheridge Law Group, PLLC 

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324 

Southlake, TX 76092 

Tel.: (817) 470-7249 

Fax: (817) 887-5950 

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Jeff@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

/s/ Irene Yang (with permission)

Barry K. Shelton 

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620 S, Suite 205

Austin, TX 78734

Telephone: (512) 263-2165

Fax: (512) 263-2166

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

Of Counsel

Michael J. Bettinger

Irene Yang

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

555 California St., Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 772-1200

Fax: (415) 772-7400

mbettinger@sidley.com 

irene.yang@sidley.com 

Case 6:20-cv-00457-ADA Document 34 Filed 11/20/20 Page 2 of 3
Richard A. Cederoth

John W. McBride

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

1 South Dearborn St.

Chicago, IL 60603

Telephone: (312) 853-7000

Fax: (312) 853-7036

rcederoth@sidley.com 

jwmcbride@sidley.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Microsoft Corporation

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered electronically 

via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, on November 

20, 2020.

/s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge 

Case 6:20-cv-00457-ADA Document 34 Filed 11/20/20 Page 3 of 3