alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Barry E. Stewart, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 of Rotech Healthcare Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:  March 30, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1572
EDGAR A. HILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (2:06-cv-00032-GMW) Submitted: June 30, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008 Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph E. Wolfe, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael McGaughran, Regional Chief Counsel, William B. Reeser, Supervisory Attorney, Craig B. Ormson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Sara Bugbee Winn, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Edgar A. Hill appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny disability benefits. We must uphold t he decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater , 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, administrative record, and the materials submitted in the joint appendix, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Hill v. Astrue , No. 2:06-cv-00032-GMW (W.D. Va. Apr. 19, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5351 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on fenpropathrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. DOLD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

fenpropathrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FENPROPATHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.22 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 fenpropathrin) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5351 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA), INC.,

ZTE (TX), INC.

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00492-ADA

ORDER SETTING MOTION HEARING HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

MOTION HEARING by Zoomoom on Friday, July 16, 2021 at 11:00 AM.

set

IT 15th day of July, 2021.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25988]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Office of Communications; Cancellation of Optional Forms

AGENCY: General Services Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture and the Department of Interior 
are cancelling the following Optional Forms because they do not collect 
the correct information:

OF 285, Warehouse Supplies Order
OF 290, Receipt for Property, Fire Suppression

    Both of these forms are replaced with the following new Optional 
Forms:

OF 316, Interagency Incident Waybill (NSN 7540-01-475-4307)
OF 326A, Interagency Incident Waybill--Continuation (NSN 7540-01-475-
4306)

    You can order the above mentioned forms from the Federal Supply 
Service, General Products Commodity Center, Fort Worth, TX (817) 978-
2508.

DATES: Effective October 11, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Barbara Williams, General Services 
Administration, (202) 501-0581.

    Dated: September 1, 2000.
Barbara M. Williams,
Deputy Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25988 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             119,606
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      536,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         42,760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   838,995
<PP&E>                                           7,607,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,186,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,945,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              961,129
<BONDS>                                          1,351,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           111,389
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,833,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,945,330
<SALES>                                          2,557,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,053,169
<CGS>                                            2,188,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,321,221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   290,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  72,476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    263,828
<INCOME-TAX>                                        87,636
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                176,192
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       176,192
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.58
        


</TABLE>
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 6 Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 6 Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 298    | 930    | 302    | 695    | 216    | 497    | 533    | 230    | 1,085  | 370   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 523    | 4,069  | 300    | 449    | 879    | 569    | 1,875  | 465    | 202    | 468   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6      | 89     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 10 Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 10 Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 92     | 71     | 318    | 281    | 365    | 610    | 216    | 838    | 422    | 57    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 99     | 639    | 692    | 647    | 1,936  | 5      | 1,614  | 520    | 155    | 3     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 569    | 27     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Rayex Corporation et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Max Sanchez, Individually and as President of Local 1614, I. B. E. W., AFL-CIO, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County,

August 23, 1957.

*Jacob J. Bosenblum*for plaintiffs.

*Henry Brickman*and *David I. Shivits*for defendants.

Nicholas M. Pette, J.

Motion by the plaintiffs for an order punishing the defendants, their agents, servants and employees, for violating the order of this court, dated December 14, 1956, which restrained the defendants from striking against the plaintiffs, interfering in an unlawful manner with the business and property of the plaintiffs, maintaining a picket line at or near their place of business and interfering in any way with delivery of merchandise to or shipment of merchandise from their place of business and creating a false impression that a labor dispute existed between the plaintiffs and the defendants, or, in the alternative, why an order should not be made and entered herein resettling the said order so as to extend its effective date until such time as the National Labor Relations Board has certified a collective bargaining agent of plaintiffs’ employees.

There is now pending in this action before an Official Referee a hearing on a previous motion made by the plaintiffs to punish the defendants for violation of the order involved, and a motion on behalf of the defendants to vacate that order. Inasmuch as issues of fact are presented herein as to whether that order has again been violated, and, indeed, whether it still subsists in view of the first ordering clause thereof which provides for the restraint “until the expiration of the term of the collective bargaining agreement presently existing between plaintiffs, Lenscraft Optical Corporation and Local 122, I. J. W. U., A. F. L.”, the motion to punish is respectfully referred to the same Official Referee to hear and determine.

*291It is to be noted that the plaintiffs contend that the contract referred to in the order of December 14, 1956 was, by its terms, automaticallly renewed and consequently the restraining order extended. The defendants urge, on the other hand, that the agreement, by its terms, expired and as a result the restraining order is no longer in effect. They point to a possible oral extension that may have been made on July 22, 1957 to extend the original agreement until such time as the National Labor Relations Board has certified a collective bargaining agent of the plaintiffs, but such an agreement they claim, however, was without the knowledge, consent or approval of plaintiffs’ employees and contrary to their best interests. All of these matters cannot be summarily disposed of and require a plenary hearing.

In view of the foregoing disposition, the court has no occasion to pass upon the alternative branch of the motion. In any event, the order cannot be resettled except by the Justice who made the original and whether there is any basis for resettlement depends upon the determination of the question whether that order still subsists.

Submit order.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00394-CV

ATIYA DHALA, M.D.

v.

ELIAZAR COSTILLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF KRISTY RENEE COSTILLA, DECEASED, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF 

A.J.C. AND C.K.C., MINORS; MELINDA RODRIGUEZ LEAL AND CAMILO TREVINO

On Appeal from the

197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-DCL-04542

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 6, 2022
EXHIBIT 32.B








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009
of Southern Natural Gas Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Sult, Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller, certify (i) that the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ John
      R. SultJohn R.
      SultSenior Vice
      President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)Southern
      Natural Gas Company






November 6,
      2009










A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern
Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Southern Natural Gas Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5576 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-amino-6-niotrophenol-4- 

sulfonic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-amino6-niotrophenol-4-sulfonic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-AMINO-6-NIOTROPHENOL-4-SULFONIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.37 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2-amino-6-niotrophenol-4-sulfonic acid) is amended by 

7 striking the date in the effective period column and insert8 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5576 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5566 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase the Federal 

medical assistance percentage for the territories. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mrs. CHRISTENSEN (for herself, Mr. PIERLUISI, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. SABLAN, 

and Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase 

the Federal medical assistance percentage for the territories. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicaid Payment 

5 Fairness to the Territories Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN THE FEDERAL MEDICAL ASSISTANCE 

7 PERCENTAGE FOR THE TERRITORIES. 

8 Section 1905(b)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 1396d(b)(2)) is amended by inserting after ‘‘55 

10 percent’’ the following: ‘‘(or, beginning with fiscal year 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5566 IH

1 2013, the highest such Federal medical assistance per2 centage applicable to any of the 50 States for the fiscal 

3 year involved)’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS