alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the financial statements of Union Pacific Railroad and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             43
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     438
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                       315
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  938
<PP&E>                                          33847
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2383
<BONDS>                                          2364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                        25
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                       9405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28914
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2637
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   334
<INCOME-TAX>                                      120
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               214
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      214
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1



























CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS







We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial information of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries for the period ended March 30, 2003, as indicated in our report dated April 22, 2003; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.



We are aware that our report referred to above, is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements File No.'s 333-02683, 333-05231, 333-15851, 333-43055, 333-51189, 333-51181, 333-57779, 333-84483 and 333-86492.



We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.









/S/ BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP



BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP









Dayton, Ohio

May 1, 2003
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

HECTOR CRUZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10328

D.C. No. 1:07-cr-00268-JMS-3

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

J. Michael Seabright, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 18, 2010

Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: B. FLETCHER, PREGERSON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Hector Cruz pled guilty to distributing 50 grams or more of

methamphetamine and agreed to a waiver of the right to appeal. In exchange, the

government dropped all other charges against him. His attorney has filed an

FILED

JUL 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

2

Anders1 brief in this appeal and has moved to withdraw as counsel. Cruz has filed

no pro se supplemental brief in response to the court’s invitation to do so.

Having examined the record, we conclude that Cruz entered into the plea

agreement and agreed to the waiver of appellate rights knowingly and voluntarily,

and that the district court complied with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. 

See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

The waiver of appellate rights to which Cruz agreed waives any challenge to

his sentence, unless the sentence exceeded the applicable guideline range as

determined by the district court, which it did not. Thus, the waiver applies to any

possible challenge to Cruz’s sentence, with two recognized exceptions: a claim that

the sentence did not comport with the terms of the plea agreement, and a claim that

the sentence violated the law. See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 624 (9th

Cir. 2007). Here, however, the sentence comported with the terms of the plea

agreement and is not unlawful. Accordingly we dismiss the appeal. We grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw.

DISMISSED; COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**OPEN ENERGYCORPORATION**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

 
| **Subsidiary**                       | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Organization** | ** ** | **Doing Business As**   |
|--------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|------------|-------------------------|
| 2093603  Ontario, Inc.          |       | Ontario, Canada                  |       | N/A                     |
|                                 |       |                             |       |                    |
| Solar Roofing  Systems, Inc.    |       | Ontario, Canada                  |       | Open Energy Corporation |
|                                 |       |                             |       |                    |
| Barnabus Energy Inc.                 |       | Alberta, Canada                  |       | N/A                     |
|                                 |       |                             |       |                    |
| Connect Renewable  Energy, Inc. |       | Nevada                           |       | Open Energy Corporation |
|                                 |       |                             |       |                    |
| WaterEye Corporation                 |       | Nevada                           |       | WaterEye Corporation    |

 

**1**

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0159

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TYLER FREDERICK ERICKSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 23, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 17 2020

11/17/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0159
Exhibit 99.2


                       SECRETARY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-QSB of
Standard  Capital  Corporation (the "Company") for the six months ended February
28,  2002,  as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof,  I,  Mary  Anne  Thachuk,  Secretary  Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best of my knowledge and belief:

1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
     or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The  information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
     material  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.


Date: July 8, 2003
                                            /s/  "Mary  Anne  Thachuk"
                                              --------------------------
                                                Mary  Anne  Thachuk
                                                Secretary  Treasurer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Movie Star, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                      
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |    |                                                                                                                                                    
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2007


/s/ Melvyn KniginMelvyn Knigin
Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 14, 2007


/s/ Thomas RendeThomas Rende
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer


---
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Group
Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended May 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Periodic Report), Raoul Tsakok, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

| | By: | /s/ Raoul Tsakok       
| | --- | -----------------------
| |     | Raoul Tsakok           
| |     | Chairman & CEO         
| |     |                        
| |     | Date: September 4, 2008

---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60927-60928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26286]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR00-9-000]


PG&E Texas Pipeline, L.P.; Notice of Staff Panel

October 6, 2000.
    Take notice that a Staff Panel shall be convened in accordance with 
the Commission order \1\ in the above-captioned docket to allow 
opportunity for written comments and for the oral presentation of 
views, data, and arguments regarding the fair and equitable rates to be 
established for transportation service under section 311 of the Natural 
Policy Act of 1978 on PG&E Texas Pipeline, L.P.'s system. The Staff 
Panel will not be a judicial or evidentiary-type hearing and there will 
be no cross-examination of persons presenting statements. Members 
participating on the Staff Panel before whom the presentations are made 
may ask questions. If time permits, Staff Panel members may also ask 
such relevant questions as are submitted to them by participants. Other 
procedural rules relating to the panel will be announced at the time 
the proceeding commences.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See PG&E Texas Pipeline, L.P., 93 FERC para. 61,012 (2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Staff Panel will be held on Friday, October 13, 2000, at 10 
a.m. in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory

[[Page 60928]]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26286 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 12, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00515

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF V.S., A CHILD,

From the 285th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA00518

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee’s motion for an extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. Appellee’s

brief is due on or before March 2, 2021

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justic e

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of February, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________ No . 07 - 20 - 00192 - CV

________________________ NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC. F/K/A CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. ,

AND CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC., PETITIONERS V. PETER BALDERAS AND MARTHA BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR INJURED AND DECEASED MINOR CHILDREN, P.B. , J R. AND E.B., INJURED MINORS, AND F.B., J.B., J.B., AND Y.B., DECEASED MINOR CHILDREN, AND JACQUELINE BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY , A ND CASANDRA BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY, RESPONDENTS O n Petition for Permissive Appeal from the 108th District Court

Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 106,846 - E - CV ; Honorable Doug Woodburn , Presiding September 14 , 20 20 

### ORDER DENYING PERMISSIVE APPEAL Before PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. Pending before this court is the Petition for Interlocutory Appeal filed by Petitioners, Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. (f/k/a Crop Production Services , Inc.) and Crop Production Services , Inc., seeking permission to appeal the t rial court’s Amended Order Denying2

Defendant Nutrien’s Amended No - Evidence Motion for Summary Jud gment and Amended Order Denying Defendant Nutrien’s Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment . Respondents have filed an objection to the petition. To be entitled to a permissive appeal from an interlocutory order not otherwise appealable, the petitioner m ust establish that (1) the order appealed involves “ a controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion ” and (2) immediate appeal from the order “ may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigati on. ” T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE A NN . § 51.014(d) (West Supp. 2019 ) ; T EX . R. A PP . P . 28.3 (e)(4). Because the petition fails to establish each of these requirement s , we deny the petition for permissive appeal. Per Curiam
EXHIBIT 15.6

The Board of Directors of

Randgold Resources Limited (the Company)

March 28, 2013



|Re: | Consent
|--- | -------

Gentlemen:

I, Onno ten Brinke, do hereby consent to the reference of myself in the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2012 (the Annual Report) to which this consent is an exhibit, to any reference to Mr. Onno ten Brinke under the heading Experts in any registration statement into which the Annual Report is incorporated by
reference, and to the citation and/or summarization of the reserve statement in the Annual Report as calculated by me for the Massawa open pit mineral reserves.

Dated this
28thday of March, 2013.



|       |  |                    
|------ |  | -------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Onno ten Brinke
|Name:  |  | Onno ten Brinke    
|Title: |  | Consultant
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00402-CV

In re Leon Posada

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

 

Jeff Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Filed: June 27, 2018
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7648

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee,

v. ROBERT SMITH, a/k/a Boo Boo, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:03-cr-00369-CCB-4)

Submitted: April 27, 2009 Decided: June 4, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Paul M. Tiao, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Smith’s motion to compel the district court to produce his plea agreement and transcript of his arraignment, deny Smith’s motion to place his case in abeyance, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith , No. 1:03-cr-00369-CCB-4 (D. Md. May 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Certification ofChief Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Gary W. McGann,Chief Executive Officer of JSG Funding plc, now known as Smurfit Kappa Fundingplc, a public limited company organized under the laws of Ireland (“JSG Funding”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(i)            the Annual Report ofJSG Funding on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Annual Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)        the information containedin the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of JSG Funding.

Thiscertification will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of thatsection. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, except to the extent that JSG Funding specifically incorporates it byreference.
| Date: November 24, 2006 |
|------------------------------|
| By:                          | /s/ GARY W. MCGANN |   |
| Name:                        | Gary W. McGann |
| Title:                       | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

  

----

**Certification ofChief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Ian J. Curley, Chief Financial Officer of JSGFunding plc, now known as Smurfit Kappa Funding plc, a public limited companyorganized under the laws of Ireland (“JSG Funding”), certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(i)            the Annual Report ofJSG Funding on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Annual Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)        the information containedin the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of JSG Funding.

This certification willnot be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,except to the extent that JSG Funding specifically incorporates it byreference.
| Date: November 24, 2006 |
|------------------------------|
| By:                          | /s IAN J.  CURLEY |   |
| Name:                        | Ian J. Curley |
| Title:                       | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

2

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ROBERT J. RECKLEIN and CURTIS ) B. RECKLIN, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-947 ) THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON ) TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ) ASSOCIATION FKA THE BANK OF ) NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, ) N.A., AS SUCCESSOR TO JP MORGAN ) CHASE BANK, N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR ) RAMP 2004RS2; WACHOVIA BANK, ) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; AND THE ) ORCHARDS COMMUNITY ) ASSOCIATION, INC., ) ) Appellees. ) ) ) Opinion filed February 1, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Hugh Hayes, Judge.
Richard J. Hollander and Melissa H. Jeda of Miller, Hollander and Jeda, Naples, for Appellants. Kimberly S. Mello and Joseph H. Picone of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association FKA The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.,- 2 -

as successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Trustee for RAMP 2004RS2. No appearance for the remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
#### MORENO v. STATE.

No. 23322.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 3, 1946.

J. Earl Barnhouse, of Alice, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is under Art. 1341, P.C., for driving an automobile upon a public road without the consent of the owner of said automobile, punishment assessed at confine-rtnent in the county jail for six months.

Our State’s Attorney moves for dismissal of the appeal because: First, the caption is defective in failing to state the adjourning date of the trial court; second, no notice of appeal is found in the record. Art. 827, C. C. P.; third, the appeal bond is defective in that it does not comply with the provisions of the statute for either a recognizance or an appeal bond, but is in the nature of an appearance bond.

The motion is sustained, and the appeal dismissed.