alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000,000
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            $    98
<SECURITIES>                                          134
<RECEIVABLES>                                         591
<ALLOWANCES>                                            4
<INVENTORY>                                            63
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    1,078
<PP&E>                                             13,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                      4,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     11,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1,094
<BONDS>                                               577
<COMMON>                                              167
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                          5,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       11,166
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    1,046
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       71
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       202
<INCOME-TAX>                                           74
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   128
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                          128
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        

</TABLE>
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,087  | 307    | 1,052  | 852    | 1,323  | 1,238  | 6,278  | 376    | 192    | 292   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 419    | 1,078  | 115    | 594    | 62     | 2,427  | 361    | 9,189  | 1,416  | 146   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 398    | 1,969  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7945

LONNIE BOYD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District 

Judge. (2:09-cv-00337-JBF-TEM)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lonnie Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lonnie Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Boyd has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 12

Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-13 Filed 07/31/20 Page 1 of 2
7/14/2020 Cases Search

https://search.docketnavigator.com/patent/binder/0/0?print=true 1/1

Cases Search

Cases Search 14 Results

Judges: Lucy H. Koh Case Status: Active

Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless v. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.

5-20-cv-03092 (NDCA)

May. 05, 2020

AT&T Corp. et al v. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.

5-20-cv-02995 (NDCA)

Apr. 30, 2020

Proven Networks, LLC v. F5 Networks, Inc.

5-20-cv-02521 (NDCA)

Apr. 13, 2020

Apple Inc v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.

5-20-cv-02460 (NDCA)

Apr. 10, 2020

Twitter, Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.

5-20-cv-02397 (NDCA)

Apr. 08, 2020

Proven Networks, LLC v. Extreme Networks, Inc.

5-20-cv-02067 (NDCA)

Mar. 24, 2020

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Capella Photonics, Inc.

3-20-cv-01858 (NDCA)

Mar. 16, 2020

Uniloc USA Inc et al v. LG Electronics USA Inc et al

5-18-cv-06738 (NDCA)

Nov. 06, 2018

Illumina, Inc. et al v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. et al

3-18-cv-02847 (NDCA)

May. 15, 2018

Corephotonics, Ltd. v. Apple Inc.

5-18-cv-02555 (NDCA)

Apr. 30, 2018

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.

5-18-cv-00357 (NDCA)

Jan. 17, 2018

PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Atlassian, Inc.

5-18-cv-00154 (NDCA)

Jan. 08, 2018

PersonalWeb Technologies LLC et al v. Venmo, Inc.

5-18-cv-00177 (NDCA)

Jan. 08, 2018

Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

3-17-cv-00939 (NDCA)

Feb. 23, 2017

Case Case Filing Date

Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-13 Filed 07/31/20 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 5
 

 

 

Page 2 of 5
 

 

 

Page 3 of 5
 

 

Page 4 of 5
 

Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 3

Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-3 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-3 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-3 Filed 01/29/21 Page 3 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-3 Filed 01/29/21 Page 4 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-3 Filed 01/29/21 Page 5 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-3 Filed 01/29/21 Page 6 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-3 Filed 01/29/21 Page 7 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-3 Filed 01/29/21 Page 8 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-3 Filed 01/29/21 Page 9 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-3 Filed 01/29/21 Page 10 of 10
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Western District of Texas ✔

6:20-cv404 5/19/2020 Western District of Texas

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., AND EMC 

CORPORATION 

7,212,536 5/1/2007 WSOU Investments, LLC Print Save As... Reset
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|Wyoming Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Wyoming Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 9      | 9     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 19     | 29     | 32     | 37     | 41     | 49     | 52     | 105    | 129    | 125   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 86     | 94     | 68     | 73     | 61     | 28     | 41     | 74     | 84     | 29    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 11     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### YOUNG v. STATE.

No. 25388.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 17, 1951.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is unlawfully transporting whiskey and beer in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $350.

No notice of appeal appears in the record.

The appeal is dismissed.
Unopposed Motion for Withdrawal Page | 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00454-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00455-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00456-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00457-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00458-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00459-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00460-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00461-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00462-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00463-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00464-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00465-ADA

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF 

COUNSEL FROM CASE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC (“WSOU”), James L. Etheridge, Ryan S. 

Loveless, Travis L. Richins, Brett A. Mangrum, Jeffrey Huang, Brian M. Koide, and Nathan K. 

Cummings, and their firm Etheridge Law Group, PPLC, hereby move to withdraw as counsel of 

record for Plaintiff.

The lawyers with Sussman Godfrey, LLP and Mark Siegmund with Steckler Wayne 

Cochran Cherry will remain as counsel for Plaintiff.

This withdrawal will not cause a continuance or delay and will not prejudice WSOU or any 

other party to this action.

Defense counsel is not opposed to this motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff respectfully requests 

the Court enter an order reflecting this withdrawal and that all necessary changes be made to the 

Court’s records and ECF.

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 107 Filed 11/30/21 Page 1 of 3
Unopposed Motion for Withdrawal Page | 2

DATED: November 30, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge

Texas State Bar No. 24059147

Ryan S. Loveless

Texas State Bar No. 24036997

Travis L. Richins

Texas State Bar No. 24061296

Brett A. Mangrum

Texas State Bar No. 24065671

Jeffrey Huang

Brian M. Koide

Nathan K. Cummings 

ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Telephone: (817) 470-7249

Facsimile: (817) 887-5950

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com

Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com

JeffH@EtheridgeLaw.com

Brian@EtheridgeLaw.com

Nathan@EtheridgeLaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

Certificate of Conference

I hereby certify that on November 30, 2021, I, James Etheridge, conferred with 

Defendant regarding Etheridge Law Group’s withdrawal from the case. Defendants are 

unopposed to this motion.

By: /s/James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 107 Filed 11/30/21 Page 2 of 3
Unopposed Motion for Withdrawal Page | 3

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on November 30, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing using the 

Court’s Case Management and Electronic Case Filing system, which will send notification of 

such filing to counsel of record as registered in the Court’s system. 

By: /s/James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 107 Filed 11/30/21 Page 3 of 3
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5519 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Acrylate Modified Vinyl acetateVinyl chloride copolymer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. WALBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Acrylate Modified 

Vinyl acetate-Vinyl chloride copolymer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACRYLATE MODIFIED VINYL ACETATE-VINYL 

4 CHLORIDE COPOLYMER . 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylate Modified Vinyl acetate-Vinyl chloride copolymer (CAS No. 32650–26– 

3) (provided for in subheading 3904.30.60) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5519 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

From: Jonathan Lee 

Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 5:02 PM

To: ZroBlack, LLC_003

Subject: Fwd: Zroblack.com

Sent from my iPhone 

Begin forwarded message: 

From:

Date: August 15, 2019 at 5:54:36 PM CDT 

To: jsaenz

Subject: Zroblack.com

Hey man, 

Can you transfer the zroblack.com website to this email address. 

 

Let me know if you run into any issues. 

Thanks, 

Jonathan 

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-20 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 1
#### HYMAN v. BRADY et al.

No. 12092.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 10, 1950.

David A. Grose, Alice, for appellant.

William E. Remy, San Antonio, for ap-pellees.

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment for $5,558.04, in favor of Kathryn Brady (formerly Kathryn Hyman) and against Vance Hyman. Of this amount, $3,308.04 was the balance due upon a promissory note dated February 27, 1946, executed by Vance Hyman and payable to Kathryn Hyman. Appellant makes no complaint as to this portion of the judgment. The court, however, awarded Mrs. Brady the sum of $2,-250, representing fifteen delinquent payments of $150 each, as and for the support of the minor Blanche Kay Hyman.

Appellant and appellee were divorced by decree dated February 27, 1946. In contemplation of this divorce, a settlement agreement was executed. This contract and its legal effect are discussed by us in the opinion this day handed down in Cause No. 12090, styled Brady v. Hyman, Tex.Civ. *346App., 230 S.W.2d 342, to which we now refer.

Appellant contends that the agreement and the decree of February 27, 1946, will not support a money judgment against him.

In Cause No. 12090 we held that the provisions of the divorce decree relating to child support and based upon Article 4639a, § 1, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats., and enforcible by contempt proceedings, were subject to subsequent modification by the court as provided for in said article. We also held that such modification did not affect the contractual obligation evidenced by the decree and the agreement adopted as a part thereof. It follows from these holdings that Mrs. Brady as plaintiff below was entitled to recover judgment in an action based upon the contract.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

BROETER, J., did not participate in this decision.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18
United States Code

The
undersigned, being the Principal Financial Officer of Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. ("Enbridge Management"), hereby certifies that the Enbridge Management Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in such
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Enbridge Management.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Enbridge Management and will be retained by Enbridge Management and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:
February 25, 2005

|/s/MARK A. MAKIMark A. Maki
Vice President, Finance and Principal Financial Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00816

- CV

Daniel A. BASS

, Appellant

v.

COMMISSION FOR LAWYE R DISCIPLINE

, Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 19911

The Honorable Mollee Bennett Westfall, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is VACATED without consideration of the merits, and the cause is R EMANDED to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreed judgment. Costs of appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.

SIGNED March 26, 2014.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice