alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# AGENCY:

 Surface Transportation Board.

# ACTION:

 Notice of exemption.

# SUMMARY:

                         The Board, under 49 U.S.C. 10502, exempts the trackage rights described in STB Finance Docket No. 33833 [1]                                                  to permit the trackage rights to expire on February 7, 2000, in accordance with the agreement of the parties.                    

# DATES:

 This exemption is effective on February 7, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

 An original and 10 copies of all pleadings referring to STB Finance Docket No. 33833 (Sub-No. 1) must be filed with the Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of all pleadings must be served on petitioners' representatives (1) Yolanda Grimes Brown, The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, 2500 Lou Menk Drive, P.O. Box 961039, Fort Worth, TX 76161-0039, and (2) Robert Opal, Esq., Union Pacific Railroad Company, 1416 Dodge Street, Room 830, Omaha, NE 68179.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Joseph H. Dettmar (202) 565-1600. [TDD for the hearing impaired (202) 565-1695.]

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                     Additional information is contained in the Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, call, or pick up in person from: Da                    ̄                    -To-Da                    ̄                     Office Solutions, Suite 210, 1925 K Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 289-4357. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD services 1-800-877-8339.]                

Board decisions and notices are available on our website at “WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.”

Decided: January 28, 2000.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                 On December 29, 1999, BNSF filed a notice of exemption under the Board's class exemption procedures at 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). The notice covered the agreement by Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) to grant temporary overhead trackage rights to The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company over UP's rail line between Stockton, CA, in the vicinity of UP's milepost 82.3 (Fresno Subdivision), and Fresno, CA, in the vicinity of UP's milepost 207.0 (Fresno Subdivision).                             *See The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company—Trackage Rights Exemption—Union Pacific Railroad Company,*                            STB Finance Docket No. 33833 (STB served Jan. 18, 2000). The trackage rights operations under the exemption became effective and were scheduled to be consummated on January 15, 2000.                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-2566 Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Randgold Resources Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Roger A. Williams, Finance Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

                                             /s/ Roger A. Williams
                                             ---------------------
                                             Roger A. Williams
                                             Finance Director

         June 27, 2003
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

ROBERT J. ESQUIVEL,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

DAVID KENDRICK, BADGE #0567, 

PATROL DIVISION, SAN ANTONIO 

POLICE DEPARTMENT; TROOPER 

FNU EASTBURN, #14720, TEXAS 

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; 

TROOPER FNU BIBBY, #14593, TEXAS 

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; 

TROOPER FNU WINDGATE, #13157, 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC 

SAFETY; SAN ANTONIO POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, TEXAS HIGHWAY 

PATROL DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC 

SAFETY,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

SA-20-CV-00377-OLG

ORDER

Before the Court in the above-styled cause of action is Plaintiff’s pro se Motion for 

Continuance [#5], by which he asks for an extension of time to file his More Definite Statement 

ordered by the Court. Plaintiff explains in his motion that he lacks information to answer all of 

the questions posed by the Court in its previous order and requests discovery of evidence of all 

state-court documents pertaining to the arrest underlying this lawsuit. 

The Court will grant Plaintiff the requested extension of time. However, this federal 

Court does not have the ability to provide Plaintiff with state-court documents to assist him in 

understanding the criminal proceedings at issue. But Plaintiff does not need these documents to 

answer the questions posed in the Court’s order for a more definite statement. Plaintiff should 

answer the Court’s questions based on his own personal knowledge and memory of the events on 

Case 5:20-cv-00377-OLG-ESC Document 6 Filed 04/28/20 Page 1 of 2
2

the day of his arrest and surrounding his detention and any criminal proceedings that followed 

his arrest and detention. All the Court requires at this stage of the proceedings are facts from the 

perspective of Plaintiff. If the Court needs to review the state-court documents, Plaintiff has 

provided the Court with his SID number, and the Court can review these public records after 

receiving Plaintiff’s More Definite Statement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s pro se Motion for Continuance [#5] is 

GRANTED IN PART as follows: Plaintiff must file his More Definite Statement on or before

May 19, 2020. 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that in all other respects the motion is DENIED. 

SIGNED this 28th day of April, 2020.

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00377-OLG-ESC Document 6 Filed 04/28/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Whitestone REIT (the "Company") on Form
10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James C. Mastandrea, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
      James C. MastandreaJames
      C. MastandreaChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer





Dated
this 29th day of April, 2008
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-90756-03, 333-101598-03, 333-107942-05 and 333-119261-27 and Form S-4 No. 333-131342-56) of ElderTrust Operating Limited Partnership of our report dated March 22, 2006, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of ElderTrust Operating Limited Partnership (the Partnership) included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

April 3, 2006
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.8.7      Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement Renewal and
                    Extension Acknowledgment between Quaker City Bank and
                    Harold Rams dated July 1, 2001.


                                QUAKER CITY BANK
                          CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
                      RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT



Name of Participant:              Harold Rams
                    ------------------------------------------



The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly
scheduled meeting on June 21, 2001, the Board of Directors of Quaker City Bank
acted to renew and extend the Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement with
the undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until
June 30, 2003.


Dated this     1st     day of        July           , A.D.,      2001          .
           ---     ---        ------      ----------        ----      ---------



                              QUAKER CITY BANK


  /s/ Harold Rams             By:  /s/ Frederic R. McGill
--------------------             --------------------------
Participant                      President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA), INC. 

and ZTE (TX), INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00497-ADA

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

Defendants ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA), Inc. and ZTE (TX), Inc., (collectively

“ZTE”), notify the Court and the parties of the appearance of Lionel M. Lavenue as counsel on 

its behalf. Defendants respectfully request that Mr. Lavenue, who is enrolled in the Court’s 

CM/ECF system and whose contact information is set forth below, be included on the Court’s 

and parties’ service lists. 

DATED: November 5, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/Lionel M. Lavenue 

Lionel M. Lavenue

Virginia Bar No. 49,005

lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

1875 Explorer Street, Suite 800

Reston, VA 20190

Phone: (571) 203-2700

Fax: (202) 408-4400

Attorney for Defendants, 

ZTE Corporation

ZTE (USA), Inc.

ZTE (TX), Inc.

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA Document 32 Filed 11/05/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system on November 5, 2020. 

/s/Lionel M. Lavenue 

Lionel M. Lavenue

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA Document 32 Filed 11/05/20 Page 2 of 2
#### EVERETT v. STATE.

No. 23536.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 8, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was charged by indictment in the District Court of Shelby County, Texas, with the offense of obtaining a narcotic drug by a forged prescription. Appellant waived a jury and entered his plea of guilty before the court. After hearing said plea and the evidence in said cause, appellant was found guilty and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record, as brought forward, contains neither bills of exceptions nor a statement of facts. The proceedings are regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### COWSERT v. STATE.

No. 25664.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1952.

*264No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Possession of beer for sale in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $500 and ninety days in jail.

No statement of facts and no bills of exception accompany the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-119008 on Form S-8 of our reports, dated March 7, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Rotech Healthcare Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) andon the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rotech Healthcare Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Certified PublicAccountants 

Orlando, Florida 

March 7, 2008
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., §

Plaintiff, §

§

§ 6:20-CV-00272-ADA

v. §

§

AMAZON.COM, INC.; 

AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC; and 

AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.,

§

§ 

Defendants. §

§

FINAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE COURT

On February 8, 2023, the parties in the above captioned case submitted a First Amended 

Joint Claim Construction Statement, in which the parties agreed on the following previously 

disputed claim terms: “network element(s),” ““identifier(s),” “first participant profile,” and 

“private network.” ECF No. 84 at 1–2. The parties also identified the following two terms as 

disputed claim terms that still needed construction: “routing message” and “gateway.” Id. at 2–3.1

The Court provided preliminary claim constructions on February 14, 2023, for U.S. Patent No. 

10,218,606. Because the Court preliminarily construed the term “gateway” as “a device that 

connects networks and can adjust a protocol of traffic moving between the networks,” the parties 

agreed not to argue this term. The Court held a claim construction hearing on February 15, 2023, 

in which the Court heard argument on the following claim term: “routing message.” After careful 

1 The Court construed the identical term “gateway” to mean “a device that connects networks 

and can adjust a protocol of traffic moving between the networks” in the Claim Construction 

Order issued on June 3, 2022, in VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al., No. 6:21-cv00668-ADA, ECF No. 67 (W.D. Tex.). Although the parties maintained the assertion of their 

proposed constructions, the parties agreed that they would not argue this term at the claim 

construction hearing if the Court preliminarily adopted the same construction as in the other 

matter.

Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 87 Filed 02/17/23 Page 1 of 3
2

consideration of the parties’ briefs, oral argument, and the applicable law, the Court enters its final 

constructions for each term as shown below.

Claim Term Court’s Final Construction

“routing message” 

claims 1, 8, 14, 19, 21, 26, 27, 32

“a message that includes a callee user name 

field, a route field, and a time to live field”

Claim Term Court’s Final Construction

“gateway”

claims 14, 26

“a device that connects networks and can 

adjust a protocol of traffic moving between 

the networks”

Claim Term Court’s Final Construction

“network element(s)” 

claims 1, 4, 8, 14, 19-21, 23, 24, 27, 32

Plain and ordinary meaning.

Claim Term Court’s Final Construction

“identifier(s)” 

claims 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 19, 21, 22, 27, 

32, 42, 44

Plain and ordinary meaning.

Claim Term Court’s Final Construction

“first participant profile” 

claims 1, 3, 19-21, 42, 44

Plain and ordinary meaning.

Claim Term Court’s Final Construction

“private network” 

claim 8

Plain and ordinary meaning.

Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 87 Filed 02/17/23 Page 2 of 3
3

SIGNED this 17th day of February, 2023.

Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 87 Filed 02/17/23 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 10.28


 


 


 


March 14, 2021


 


 


This document confirms that HillCour, Inc. will provide additional
capital as required to Marpai Health (“Company”) until at least April 2022.


 


Background and support:


 


	1.	Hillcour is currently the largest single investor of Marpai Health representing
an ownership of 23% of the Company’s outstanding equity (if our convertible notes are converted).



	2.	We are committed to the success of our investment and realize that we may need to
commit additional funding to the entity as it continues in its current path.



	3.	We will soon sign an agreement whereby Marpai will acquire our wholly owned company,
Continental Benefits. We believe that this acquisition will give us a path to recover our investment in Continental Benefits and hopefully
make a profit on it. The acquisition would close simultaneously with the IPO of Marpai.



	4.	In the case that Marpai does not complete its initial public offering, which is
planned for late Q2 2021, we are prepared to fund the operating expenses of the entity so that it has liquidity until April 2022.



	5.	The Company currently has a cash position as of 3/3/21 of $1.05 million. This amount
is projected to cover the Company’s operating expenses until June 2021. If the Company has not: 1) completed its IPO, 2) secured
another private round of financing; 3) or secured enough revenue to fund its operations, then we are prepared to fund the gaps so that
it has enough liquidity to operate at least until April 2022. If none of the three events mentioned above happen, we understand that the
total un-funded operating expenses until April 2022 are planned to be in a range of $3.5 million to $4.5 million based on the Company’s
current projections.



	6.	The personal financial statements of the principal of Hillcour have been sent under
separate cover. These are unencumbered assets, which may be used to satisfy the liabilities of Continental Benefits as well as Marpai
Health as memorialized in this letter.



 


	/s/ Damien Lamendola	 
	 	 
	By:	Damien Lamendola	 
	Its	Owner	 
	 	 









 


4830 W. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 100, Tampa,
FL 33609 ∙ Phone: 863-8255-4171
Exhibit 13.4

PRINCIPAL COLLECTIONS INFORMATION IN AUD (AND USD WHERE INDICATED) AGGREGATED TO
THE DATE OF THE LAST PAYMENT


Aggregate coupon interest paid to noteholders of  each class of notes
Class A2: USD 13,051,700.52

Aggregate of Principal payments made in respect to each class of notes:
Class A2: USD 136,586,200.00

Aggregate Mortgage Principal Repayments received for the period:
Scheduled     AUD 14,161,942.48
Unscheduled   AUD 301,511,551.73

Aggregate of all redraws on housing loans:
AUD 71,773,846.37

Aggregate of outstanding balance of housing loans at the end of the period:
AUD 1,665,151,544.80

Aggregate Income of the trust for the period:   AUD 87,137,984.42
Aggregate Expenses of the trust for the period: AUD 73,963,041.85

Interest rates for the period:

Class A2 Notes(average):      1.6900%

Delinquency and loss statistics with respect to the housing loans:

Loss:             Nil
Delinquency:      0-29 days     1.42%
                  30 -59 days   0.34%
                  60+ days      0.24%
WACHOVIA        8739 Research Drive
	Charlotte, NC 28288
SECURITIES	
 
**Commercial Loan Servicing

 

Management's Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, Wachovia Bank National Association    (the Bank) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) *Uniform Single**Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* (USAP), except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.I., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans. As of and for this same period, the Bank                        had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $200       million and $20 million, respectively.

 

 
*John M. Church					March 10, 2003
                  John M. Church					Date

Managing Director/ Senior Vice President

  Wachovia Bank National Association

 

 
*Timothy S. Ryan					March 10, 2003
                Timothy S. Ryan					Date

           Director/Vice President

  Wachovia Bank National Association

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wachovia Services is the trade name under which Wachovia Corporation conducts its investment banking, capital markets and institutional securities business 

Through First Union Securities, Inc. ("FUSI"), member NYSE, NASD, SIPC and through other bank and non bank and broker dealer subsidiaries of Wachovia Corporation,

Including Wachovia Bank, N.A. and First Union National Bank.****
EXHIBIT A

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 78-1 Filed 05/02/23 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.

And SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS

AMERICA, INC.,

 Defendants.

Civil Case No. 6:20-cv-00507-ADA

ORDER

The Court has reviewed Neonode’s Unopposed Motion, accompanying exhibit, and the 

relevant legal authorities and, there being good cause, GRANTS the Motion to Amend the Court’s 

Amended Scheduling Order (ECF No. 65) as follows:

Original 

Deadline

Amended 

Deadline

Item

May 5, 2023 May 19, 2023 Plaintiff files Responsive claim construction brief.

May 19, 2023 June 9, 2023 Defendant files Reply claim construction brief.

May 19, 2023 June 9, 2023 Parties to jointly email the law clerks (see OGP at 1) to 

confirm their Markman date and to notify if any venue or 

jurisdictional motions remain unripe for resolution

June 2, 2023 June 22, 2023 Plaintiff files a Sur-Reply claim construction brief.

June 7, 2023 June 27, 2023 Parties submit Joint Claim Construction Statement and 

email the law clerks an editable copy. 

See General Issues Note #7 regarding providing copies of the 

briefing to the Court and the technical advisor (if appointed).

June 9, 2023 June 27, 2023 Parties submit optional technical tutorials to the Court and 

technical adviser (if appointed).

June 23, 2023 July 7, 2023 Markman Hearing at 9:00 a.m. This date is a placeholder and

the Court may adjust this date as the Markman hearing 

approaches.

June 26, 2023 July 10, 2023 Fact Discovery opens; deadline to serve Initial Disclosures 

per Rule 26(a)

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 78-1 Filed 05/02/23 Page 2 of 3
All other deadlines in the Court’s Amended Scheduling Order (ECF No. 65) remain in 

effect. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this ______ day of , 2023.

Alan D Albright

United States District Judge

Case 6:20-cv-00507-ADA Document 78-1 Filed 05/02/23 Page 3 of 3
#### GEORGE H. EBERT v. W. DALE STEIN and Others.1

October 27, 1911.

Nos. 17,261—(52).

bindings sustain the decision.

The findings support the conclusion of law. [Reporter.]

Action in the district court for St. Louis county by the trustee in bankruptcy •of the estate of Maximilian J. Stein, to set aside a certain deed made by M. •J. Stein and his wife to their son, W. D. Stein, within four months immediately .preceding the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, as a preferential transfer to the extent it paid the bankrupt’s indebtedness to defendant W. D. Stein and ■fraudulent as to the excess over such payment, and to set the same aside as fraudulent, in respect to creditors. The case was tried before Ensign, J., who made findings of fact and as conclusions of law found that the deed was a preferential transfer and adjudged that it be canceled and that plaintiff as "trustee was the owner of the land. Prom the judgment entered pursuant to the ¡findings, defendants appealed.

Affirmed.

*J. Be La Motte,*for appellants.

*Courtney & Courtney*and *John Brown,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 132 N. W. 1134.

Tee Cueiam.

Appeal from a judgment. There is no case or bill of exception, the only question presented is whether the findings of fact support the conclusions of law. We hold that they do. No discussion is necessary.

Order affirmed.