alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         248,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,561,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,240,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,074,000
<PP&E>                                     168,353,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              45,864,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             149,803,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,374,000
<BONDS>                                     28,000,000
<COMMON>                                        65,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    517,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,134,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               149,803,000
<SALES>                                     20,557,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,557,000
<CGS>                                       16,073,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,183,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                34,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             788,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                717,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   287,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            430,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   430,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Deborah Laufer, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

KHUSHBU INVESTMENT LLC, 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00383-

ADA-JCM

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL [FRCP 41(A)] AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby notifies this Court 

pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i) that this action is dismissed with prejudice as 

to all claims, causes of action, and parties, with each party bearing that party’s 

own attorney’s fees and costs.

Dated: June 2, 2020 

/s/ Tristan W. Gillespie

Tristan W. Gillespie, Esq.

THOMAS B. BACON, P.A.

5150 Cottage Farm Rd.

Johns Creek, GA 30022

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, 

DEBORAH LAUFER

Case 6:20-cv-00383-ADA-JCM Document 7 Filed 06/02/20 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(i), IT IS ORDERED THAT 

THIS ACTION BE, AND HEREBY IS, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to 

all claims, causes of action, and parties, with each party bearing that party’s own 

attorney’s fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to close the file. 

Dated: June 2, 2020

 ___________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00383-ADA-JCM Document 7 Filed 06/02/20 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ARNOLD KING,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 399 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 30th day of September, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal and Motion to Strike Respondent’s Response are** DENIED

**.**
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Western District of Texas

WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing

Microsoft Corporation

6:20-cv-00456-ADA

WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development

10/05/2021 /s/ Kalpana Srinivasan

Attorney’s signature

Kalpana Srinivasan 237460

Printed name and bar number

Susman Godfrey L.L.P.

1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Address

ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com

(310) 789-3100

(310) 789-3150

Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 82 Filed 10/05/21 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on October 5, 2021, I electronically filed this document with 

the Clerk of Court via the Court’s CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to 

all counsel of record, all of whom have consented to electronic service in this action.

/s/ Kalpana Srinivasan

Kalpana Srinivasan

Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 82 Filed 10/05/21 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                        
|                                                                                                     
|U.S. Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                     
|U.S. Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8 | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         | 33,049  | 33,157  | 36,047 | 36,873 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 42,834  | 52,948  | 49,974  | 49,068  | 51,412  | 59,658  | 66,714  | 78,094  | 85,543 | 98,092 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 113,439 | 118,224 | 110,351 | 115,915 | 147,732 | 104,116 | 110,476 | 167,486 | 19,212 | 184,044
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 140,213 | 16,833  |         |         |         |         |         |         |        |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Southwest Water Company (the “Company”)for the period endingMarch 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Richard J. Shields, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

 

(1)                the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)               theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   May  10, 2004 | /s/ Richard J.Shields                                                                                                   |   |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                             |                                                                                                                    |
|                             | **Richard J. Shields****Chief Financial  Officer**

******(Principal Financial Officer and Chief  Accounting Officer)** |

 

----
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Group Ventures,
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2004, as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
  Report"), I, Richard (Xuxin) Shao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

|By: |  | /s/ Richard (Xuxin) Shao
|--- |  | ------------------------
|    |  | Richard (Xuxin) Shao    
|    |  | President & CFO         
|    |  | Date: September 7, 2004 

---
Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 57-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 1 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 57-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 2 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 57-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 3 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 57-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 4 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 57-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 5 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 57-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 6 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 57-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 7 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 57-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 8 of 8
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Howard Bobo, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J.), rendered January 20, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the first degree, two counts of robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment aggregating from 10 to 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

In this robbery of two complainants by defendant and two accomplices, defendant contends that an impermissible showup was conducted. At the time the identification was made, the officers did not know that a robbery had been committed and therefore the subsequent identification by witnesses who came over to the police car and identified defendant was spontaneous, and not police arranged.

Defendant’s argument that he should have been permitted to examine the identifying witness at the *Wade*hearing is without merit. Defendant never requested the identifying witness to be present at the first portion of the hearing dealing with the propriety of the pretrial viewing. Nor did defendant have standing to participate in the independent source hearing as to the codefendant. The court did not abuse its discretion by not requiring the victim to testify at the *Wade*hearing where the pretrial identification was shown not to be suggestive *(People v Peterkin,*151 AD2d 407, *affd*75 NY2d 985; *People v Chipp,*75 NY2d 327, *cert denied*— US —, 112 L Ed 2d 70).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00 181 -CR Ri c har d Eug e ne P igg , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee
F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF B ELL COUNTY , 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 6018 2 , HO NORAB LE JO E CARROLL , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E MO R

A N D UMO P I N I O N Richard Eu gen e P i ggseeks to appe al his conviction for e ng ag ing in or g anized criminal ac tivity . The trial c ourt has cer tified that Pigg waived the right of appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P. 2 5. 2( a )( 2) ; M

o n r e a l v . Stat e , 99 S.W. 3d

61 5, 62 2 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 03 ); see also Blanco v . Sta te , 18 S.W .3d 218, 220 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The appe al is dismis sed. SeeTe x. R. A pp . P. 25.2(d).

_____________________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _______ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and He nson Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Apr il 11, 2007 Do No t Pu

bli sh
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-126211) pertaining to the 2004 Global Share
Option Plan of Zone 4 Play, Inc. of our report dated April 10, 2006 with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Zone 4 Play, Inc. included in its
Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                              /s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
                                              --------------------------------
Tel Aviv, Israel                              KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
March 29, 2007                                A Member of Ernst & Young Global
iN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

MAXIMILLIAN TREMBLAY, § 

PLAINTIFF, § 

§ 

V. § 

§ 

NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC., § 

DEFENDANT. § 

CAUSE NO. 1:20-CV-361-LY 

ORDER CLOSING CASE 

Before the court is the above entitled cause. On May 9, 2022, the parties filed a Stipulation 

of Dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)( 1 )(A)(ii) (Doc. #60). 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case is CLOSED. 

SIGNED this day of May, 2022. 

UNI ED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:20-cv-00361-LY Document 61 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 198 (Thursday, October 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26129]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-506-001]


Northwest Pipeline Corp.; Notice of Correction Filing

October 5, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 2, 2000, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest) tendered for filing and acceptance the following tariff 
sheets as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, to 
be effective as indicated:

To Be Effective March 27, 2000

Substitute Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 5-A

To Be Effective July 1, 2000

Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 
5-A

    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to correct 
errors on Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 5-A. Fourteenth Revised Sheet 
No. 5-A was accepted by the Commission on September 22, 2000 in Docket 
No. RP00-506-000.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26129 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) 

INC., AND ZTE (TX), INC. 

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-487-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-488-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-489-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-490-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-491-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-492-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-493-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-494-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-495-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-496-ADA

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-497-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER DENYING ZTE CORPORATION’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER

Having considered ZTE Corporation’s Motion to Reconsider (the “motion”), the Court 

finds the motion should be DENIED. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that ZTE 

Corporation’s motion is DENIED.

Date: 

PRESIDING JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 108-4 Filed 08/18/21 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-119008 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 16, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Rotech Healthcare Inc. and our report dated March 16, 2007relating to management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rotech Healthcare Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Certified PublicAccountants 

Orlando, Florida 

March 16, 2007
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5228 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chloro-3-nitrobenzoic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. MURPHY of Connecticut (for himself and Mr. HIMES) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chloro-3-nitrobenzoic 

acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-CHLORO-3-NITROBENZOIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4-Chloro-3-nitrobenzoic 

acid (CAS No. 96–99–1) 

(provided for in subheading 2916.39.08) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5228 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                                             
|No chart available.                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                
|Alabama (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Order entered August 27, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00310
- CV
MOLLY FREYER , ET AL. , Appellant s

V. LYFT, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judic ial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 17
- 14517

ORDER Before the Court is appellee’s August 25, 2020 unopposed second motion
for an extension of time to file its brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and
extend the time to O ctober 14, 2020 . We caution appellee that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE