alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5585 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5585

        To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Aminobenzoic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Aminobenzoic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-AMINOBENZOIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      4-Aminobenzoic      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        acid (CAS No. 150-                                                 31/2015.......
                        13-0) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        2922.49.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 14-0941

ERWIN CRUZ

v.

CHERRY PETERSEN LANDRY

ALBERT

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

September 11, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, ERWIN CRUZ, pay all costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 23rd day of October, 2015.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
KPMG

 

401 South Tryon Street

Suite 2300

Charlotte, NC 28202 1911

Independent Accountants' Report

 

The Board of Directors

Wachovia Bank National Association:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report, that Wachovia Bank National Association (the Bank) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.I., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. Management is responsible for the Bank's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the       Bank's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing standards specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank has complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

KPMG LLP

March 10, 2003

KPMG LLP, KPMG LLP, a US limeted liability partnership, is

A member of KPMG International, a Swiss association
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 25293.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1951.

See also 153 Tex.Cr.R. 619, 224 S.W.2d 240.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of burglary and his punishment assessed at 12 years in the-penitentiary.

It appears by proper proof that after perfecting his appeal to this court appellant escaped from jail. It follows that this court is without jurisdiction to do other than dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JACQUELINE SCHWEIGART,

Petitioner

v.

KEVIN SCHMALENBERGER, M.D. AND

WEST SHORE ANESTHESIA

ASSOCIATES,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 444 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of February, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

JONATHAN VILLAREAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF ZROBLACK, LLC;

Plaintiff, 

v.

JOHN SAENZ, MIGUEL VILLARREAL, 

JR., GUNN, LEE & CAVE, P.C.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO. SA-20-CV-00571-OLG

FINAL JUDGMENT

On this day, the Court considered Defendant John Saenz’s Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims without Prejudice and to Enter Judgment. See Dkt. No. 81 (the “Motion”). After considering the Motion and all other matters properly before the Court, the Court believes that the Motion 

should be granted in its entirety. 

It is THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion (Dkt. No. 81) is GRANTED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that all claims and causes of action asserted against John 

Saenz by Jonathan Villareal, individually, and ZroBlack, LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are 

hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that Saenz’s counterclaims asserted against Plaintiffs are 

hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants Miguel Villareal, 

Jr. and Gunn, Lee & Cave, P.C. are hereby SEVERED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c).

FILED

DEPUTY 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BY: ________________________________ March 29, 2022

 JU

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 83 Filed 03/29/22 Page 1 of 2
2 

This Order disposes of all claims and causes of action asserted by the parties and is a final, 

appealable judgment. This judgment does not dispose of or otherwise affect Saenz’s recovery of 

attorneys’ fees, which will be considered separately by this Court. 

It is so ORDERED. 

SIGNED this ____ day of March, 2022. 

 ____________________________ 

ORLANDO L. GARCIA

Chief United States District Judge

 

29th

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 83 Filed 03/29/22 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 6, 2000, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), The International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium for Toxicology Testing of HFA-134a (“IPACT-I”) filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing a change in name of some of its members.                

The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Astra AB, a member of IPACT-I, is now known as AstraZeneca AB, Sodertalje, Sweden; Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a member of IPACT-I, is now known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals Products, Inc., Collegeville, PA; and Fisons plc, a member of IPACT-I, is now known as Fisons Ltd., Holmes Chapel, England, United Kingdom.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of IPACT-I. Membership in this joint research project remains open, and IPACT-I intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On August 7, 1990, IPACT-I filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 6, 1990 (55 Fed. Reg. 36710).                 

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on December 3, 1997. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 19, 1998 (63 FR 8477).                

Constance K. Robinson, 

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-25896  Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bruce Gage, Director of Alternative Energy Sources, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


<PAGE>


6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  March 30, 2005

By: /s/ Bruce Gage
    ----------------
    Bruce Gage
    Director
EXHIBIT 99.1

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

          Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Southwest Water Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), doeshereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

          The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the“Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

| Dated:  November 11, 2002 | /s/ ANTON C. GARNIER |  
  
 
 
**Anton C. Garnier Chief Executive Officer**

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dated:  November 11, 2002

/s/ PETER J. MOERBEEK

 
 
 
 
**Peter J. Moerbeek Chief Financial Officer through October 23, 2002**

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dated:  November 11, 2002

/s/ RICHARD J. SHIELDS

 
 
 
 
**Richard J. Shields Chief Financial Officer effective October 24, 2002**

 
          The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title18, United States Code). |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Open Energy Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DavidSaltman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
| (6)    |   | The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and                      |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (7)    |   | The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company. |

 
| /s/  David Saltman       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| David  Saltman           |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|                     |   |
| September 15,  2008 |   |

 

1

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, AND VMWARE, INC.

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00480-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

LETTER OF REQUEST FOR FOREIGN DISCOVERY
1

Defendants Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., EMC Corporation, and VMware, Inc. 

(collectively “Defendants”) seek foreign discovery from third party witnesses residing in Canada.

Defendants have attached an Appendix with a Letter of Request which includes Document 

Requests and Deposition Topics. Defendants respectfully request that the Court execute the Letter 

of Request attached as Appendix S. Defendants further request that, after the Court has signed the 

Letter of Request, the Clerk of this Court authenticate the Court’s signature under the seal of this 

Court, and return the original signed and sealed executed Letter, and two certified copies of the 

signed and sealed executed Letters, to Defendants’ counsel, Barry K. Shelton, for delivery to the

proper authority.

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, indicated 

that it reserves the right to serve its own foreign discovery in the future.

Dated: November 6, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Attorneys for Defendants
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 6, 2020, all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the 

Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton
**                                                        **BANGLA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.**                                                        **

**EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATIONS**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE *SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

I, Shuo Lou, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that this report on Form 10-KSB of Bangla Property Management,  Inc. for the  period ending March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in this report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the  financial  condition  and results of operations of  Bangla Property Management,  Inc. 				December 14, 2005/s/ Shuo Lou  Shuo Lou, Chief Financial Officer				and Director of Bangla Property Management, Inc.****

----

10KSB – Period Ending March 31, 2005                         Bangla Property Management, Inc.                      Page 34

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL 

INC., AND EMC CORPORATION, 

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-474-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Please take notice that attorney Brian M. Koide of the law firm ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, 

PLLC appears as counsel of record for Plaintiff Uniloc 2017. Mr. Koide hereby requests that all 

notices required to be given, and all papers required to be served in the above-entitled and 

numbered cause, be copied to and served upon him.

Dated: November 2, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Brian M. Koide

Brian M. Koide 

Virginia Bar No. 46,329

ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Telephone: (703) 565-2852

Facsimile: (817) 887-5950 

brian@etheridgelaw.com

Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 38 Filed 11/02/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document was served upon all counsel of record via the 

Court's CM/ECF electronic filing system in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure on November 2, 2020.

/s/ Brian M. Koide

Brian M. Koide

Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 38 Filed 11/02/20 Page 2 of 2
## ..



## SERVED: JANUARY 7, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTEROF 

### TIMOTHY GAUNA FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS No. FAA-2012-0870


### ORDER OF DISMISSAL OnAugust 3, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed a Complaint. OnJuly 19, 2012, Respondent Timothy Gatma ("Respondent") had requested a hearing. OnJanuary 7, 2013, Complainant moved to withdraw its Complaint and dismiss the case, citing settlement. 14 C.F.K 

### § 13.215 states: "Atany time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings tmder this subpart with prejudice." WHEREFORE, the within tiled Withdrawal ofComplaint having beenread and considered, itis ORDERED as follows:

### 2 1. Complainant's Withdrawal ofComplaint be and is hereby granted; and 2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice.


### (),_() I() 

# 10

# 2-0--J C.**~~.:._** BQ Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative LawJudge Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY 

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, WilburWright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1


### Timothy Gauna, 

### Respondent 2516 Lincoln Street Evanston, IL 60201 Kate Barber, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel GreatLakes Region, AGL-7B Federal Aviation Administration 2300 EastDevon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7862 FAX: 847-294-7498 ONE COPY



### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366:.7536 FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0870 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration. 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.