alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2  March 14, 2005




Securities and Exchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20549

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, John Townsend, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cellco Partnership (the Partnership), certify that:

| | (1) | the report of the Partnership on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                   
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership as of the dates and for the periods presented in the
Report.
|

|/s/ John Townsend                         
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|John Townsend                             
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cellco Partnership and will be retained by Cellco Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5405 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5405

To suspend temporarily the duty on solder spheres containing 2 percent 
                     or more, by weight, of silver.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Mr. Honda introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on solder spheres containing 2 percent 
                     or more, by weight, of silver.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOLDER SPHERES CONTAINING 2 PERCENT OR MORE, BY WEIGHT, OF 
              SILVER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Solder spheres      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          containing 2                                                      12/31/2015
                          percent or more,
                          by weight, of
                          silver (provided
                          for in subheading
                          7115.90.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

ZTE CORPORAION, ZTE (USA) 

INC, AND ZTE (TX), INC.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00487-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00488-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00489-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00490-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00491-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00492-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00493-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00494-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00495-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00496-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00497-ADA

WSOU’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF EXTRINSIC 

EVIDENCE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s Version 3.2 of the Court’s Order Governing proceedings entered 

November 9, 2020, and in accordance with the Court’s Scheduling Order, Plaintiff hereby notifies 

the Court Plaintiff has disclosed its extrinsic evidence for use in claim construction on Defendants 

ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc., and ZTE (TX), Inc. via electronic mail on February 19, 2021.

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 57 Filed 02/19/21 Page 1 of 2
DATED: February 19, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Mark D. Siegmund_____ 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered 

electronically via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, 

on this the 19th day of January 2021.

/s/ Mark D. Siegmund

Mark D. Siegmund

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 57 Filed 02/19/21 Page 2 of 2
ORDER PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Cause No. DA 22-0239

CITY OF BILLINGS,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

vs.

MERCEDES A. BENNICK,

 Defendant and Appellant.

 

______________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendant’s counsel’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s counsel is granted an extension of 

time to and including July 10th, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s

Opening Brief on appeal. 

_____________________________________

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 1 2023

06/01/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0239
EPA Registration Number

87290-9

Volume 1 Part II
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
_____________________________________

Page 25 is not included in this copy.

Pages through are not included in this copy.

_______________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of 

information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities.

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process.

_____ Description of quality control procedures.

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

_____ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending registration action.

_____ FIFRA registration data.

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______.

_X____ The document is not responsive to the request.

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical 

 composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source 

 of the ingredient.

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege.

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency.

_____ Internal Deliberative Information.

 

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who 

prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________
26
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, AND VMWARE, INC.

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00480-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

LETTER OF REQUEST FOR FOREIGN DISCOVERY

Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 48 Filed 11/06/20 Page 1 of 3
1

Defendants Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., EMC Corporation, and VMware, Inc. 

(collectively “Defendants”) seek foreign discovery from third party witnesses residing in the 

Netherlands. Defendants have attached Appendices with Letters of Request which include 

Document Requests and Deposition Topics. Defendants respectfully request that the Court execute 

the Letters of Request attached as Appendices A, B, and G. Defendants further request that, after 

the Court has signed the Letters of Request, the Clerk of this Court authenticate the Court’s 

signature under the seal of this Court, and return the original signed and sealed executed Letters, 

and two certified copies of the signed and sealed executed Letters, to Defendants’ counsel, Barry 

K. Shelton, for delivery to the proper authority.

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, indicated 

that it reserves the right to serve its own foreign discovery in the future.

Dated: November 6, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 48 Filed 11/06/20 Page 2 of 3
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 6, 2020, all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the 

Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 48 Filed 11/06/20 Page 3 of 3
----

Notice regarding the scope of the partial interim review on imports of Polyethylene Terephthalate (‘PET’) originating in, inter alia, the Republic of Korea

(2006/C 129/05)

On 1 December 2005, the Commission published in the Official Journal of the European Union a Notice of Initiation of an expiry review on the anti-dumping measures in force against imports of Polyethylene Terephthalate (‘PET’) originating in India, Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Taiwan and Thailand and a partial interim review on the same measures against imports originating in Taiwan and the Republic of Korea (1).

This scope of the present Notice is limited to the partial interim review and concerns only the Republic of Korea.

Clarification regarding the scope of the partial interim review

In point 4.2 of the Notice of Initiation, the following three companies are mentioned as being subject to the partial interim review: Daehan Synthetic Fibre Co. Ltd, SK Chemicals Co. Ltd and KP Chemicals Corp.

In the light of information gathered as part of the questionnaire response to the Notice of Initiation, it has come to the attention of the Commission that companies related to the three abovementioned companies also produce and/or distribute PET.

In order to avoid any misunderstanding about the exact scope of the investigation, it is hereby clarified that all companies related to (2) Daehan Synthetic Fibre Co. Ltd, SK Chemicals Co. Ltd and KP Chemicals Corp are also part of the scope of this investigation. If anti-dumping duties are called for by the outcome of this investigation, they will be calculated on the basis of the information obtained from the group of all related companies involved in the production and distribution of PET and will be set accordingly.

----

(1)OL C 304, 1.12.2005, p. 9.

(2)  For the notion of relationship reference is made to Article 143(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 (give full reference).

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12


           UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY
                             AND AFFILIATE COMPANIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                   (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                                        ----------------------------
Millions, Except Ratios                                                      2001         2000
                                                                         ----------    ----------
<S>                                                                      <C>           <C>
Earnings:
     Net income ......................................................   $      209    $      214
     Undistributed equity earnings ...................................          (14)           73
                                                                         ----------    ----------
     Total earnings ..................................................          195           287
                                                                         ----------    ----------
Income taxes .........................................................          122           120
                                                                         ----------    ----------
Fixed charges:
     Interest expense including amortization of debt discount ........          147           151
     Portion of rentals representing an interest factor ..............           10            43
                                                                         ----------    ----------
     Total fixed charges .............................................          157           194
                                                                         ----------    ----------
Earnings available for fixed charges .................................   $      474    $      601
                                                                         ----------    ----------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ...................................          3.0           3.1
                                                                         ----------    ----------
</TABLE>
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/03/20 Page 1 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/03/20 Page 2 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/03/20 Page 3 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/03/20 Page 4 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/03/20 Page 5 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/03/20 Page 6 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/03/20 Page 7 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/03/20 Page 8 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/03/20 Page 9 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/03/20 Page 10 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/03/20 Page 11 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00474-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/03/20 Page 12 of 12
JEFFERY SCOTT SEWARD,

SR.

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5016

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 13, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. John F. Simon, Jr. , Judge

.

Jeffery Scott Seward, Sr., pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appel lee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, AND VMWARE, 

INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00480-ADA 

Case No. 6:20-cv-00481-ADA 

Case No. 6:20-cv-00485-ADA 

Case No. 6:20-cv-00486-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DEFENDANT VMWARE, INC.’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

(FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1)

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned states that 

VMware, Inc. is a publicly traded company with no majority stockholder, no parent corporation, 

and no publicly held company directly or indirectly owning 10% or more of VMware’s stock.

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 154 Filed 01/05/22 Page 1 of 4
2

Dated: January 5, 2022 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton 

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Benjamin Hershkowitz

bhershkowitz@gibsondunn.com

Brian A. Rosenthal

brosenthal@gibsondunn.com 

Allen Kathir

akathir@gibsondunn.com

Kyanna Sabanoglu

ksabanoglu@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Ave.

NY, NY 10166-0193 

Telephone: 212.351.4000

Facsimile: 212.351.4035 

Y. Ernest Hsin

ehsin@gibsondunn.com

Jaysen S. Chung

jschung@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

555 Mission St., Ste. 3000

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921

Telephone: 415.393.8200

Facsimile: 415.393.8306

Ryan K. Iwahashi

riwahashi@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

1881 Page Mill Rd.

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1211

Telephone: 650.849.5300

Facsimile: 650.849.5333

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 154 Filed 01/05/22 Page 2 of 4
3

Emily M. Whitcher

ewhitcher@gibsondunn.com

Andrew P. Blythe

ablythe@gibsondunn.com

Nathaniel R. Scharn

nscharn@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

3161 Michelson Drive

Irvine, CA 92612-4412

Telephone: 949.451.3800

Facsimile: 949.451.4220

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 154 Filed 01/05/22 Page 3 of 4
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 5th day of January, 2022, I caused the preceding 

document to be served on all counsel through the Court’s ECF system.

/s/ Barry K. Shelton 

Barry K. Shelton

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 154 Filed 01/05/22 Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, AND VMWARE, 

INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00485-ADA

DECLARATION OF BRIAN A. ROSENTHAL IN SUPPORT OF

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

Case 6:20-cv-00485-ADA Document 32-1 Filed 10/05/20 Page 1 of 2
1

I, Brian A. Rosenthal, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney permitted to practice law before this Court pro hac vice and am 

licensed to practice law in New York and the District of Columbia. I am a partner with the law 

firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and counsel of record for Defendants Dell Technologies 

Inc., Dell Inc., EMC Corporation, and VMware, Inc. in the above-captioned action. I have 

personal knowledge and/or am directly informed of the matters stated below and, if called, would 

testify to them under oath.

2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are true and correct copies of excerpts from the file 

history of U.S. Patent No. 7,636,309, specifically from a June 5, 2009 Response and Amendment

filed by the applicant. These excerpts were retrieved from the United States Patent Office’s 

website (https://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair) on October 3, 2020.

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B are true and correct copies of excerpts from the file 

history of U.S. Patent No. 7,636,309, specifically from an August 12, 2009 Examiner Interview 

Summary. These excerpts were retrieved from the United States Patent Office’s website 

(https://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair) on October 3, 2020.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: October 5, 2020

/s/ Brian A. Rosenthal___ Brian A. Rosenthal

Case 6:20-cv-00485-ADA Document 32-1 Filed 10/05/20 Page 2 of 2
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1196, -1197

TILLOTSON CORPORATION,

Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee,

and

SMART GLOVE HOLDIN GS, SDN. BHD,
SMART GLOVE CORPORATION SDN. BHD., HENRY S CHEIN, INC., and HSI GLOVES, INC.,

Intervenors.

William D. Belanger , Pepper Hamilton LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Gregory C. Dorris , of Washington, DC. Of counsel

was Alison L. McCarthy , of Boston, Massachusetts; and Daniel C. Winston , Choate Hall & Steward LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts.

Paul M. Bartkowski , Attorney, Office of the Gener al Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washin gton, DC, argued for appel lee. With him on
the brief were James M. Lyons , General Counsel, and Andrea C. Casson , Assistant General Counsel for Litigation. Of counsel was Wayne W. Herrington , Attorney.

Scott M. Daniels , Westerman Hattori, Daniels & Ad rian LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for intervenors.

Appealed from: United States International Trade CommissionNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1196,-1197

TILLOTSON CORPORATION,

Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee,

and

SMART GLOVE HOLDINGS, SDN. BHD,
SMART GLOVE CORPORATION SDN. BHD., HENRY SCHEIN, INC., and HSI GLOVES, INC.,

Intervenors.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States International Trade Commission

in INVESTIGATION NOS. 337-TA-608 and 612.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (BRYSON, ARCHER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges .)

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: December 14, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of TraceGuard Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      David Ben-Yair, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(3)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(4)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





Date: March
                29, 2007
            By:
            /s/ David
              Ben-YairDavid
                  Ben-YairChief
                    Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      TraceGuard Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by TraceGuard Technologies,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Exhibit A-1 

Case 1:20-cv-00589-LY Document 1-4 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 3
6/2/2020 Online Case Information - Details

https://www.traviscountytx.gov/district-clerk/online-case-information 1/2

Details

Updated : Tuesday, June 2, 2020 4:35:48 AM

New Search (/OnlineCaseInformationWeb/)

Request Documents (https://www.traviscountytx.gov/district-clerk/records-request)

Cause Number

Case Status

Style

Filed Date

Hearing Date

D-1-GN-20-002206

PENDING

FREEMAN V. WYNDEN STARK LLC

4/20/2020

--

Attorney Type Full/Business Name First Name Middle Name Last Name

HASH PAUL E. DEFENDANT WYNDEN STARK LLC

SANFORD BRIAN PAUL PLAINTIFF DANIEL FREEMAN

Event Date Party Type Description

5/29/2020 DF ORIG ANSWER/SPECIAL APPEARANCE

4/28/2020 DF ISS:CITATION

4/20/2020 PL ORIGINAL PETITION/APPLICATION

New Search (/OnlineCaseInformationWeb/)

Case 1:20-cv-00589-LY Document 1-4 Filed 06/03/20 Page 2 of 3
6/2/2020 Online Case Information - Details

https://www.traviscountytx.gov/district-clerk/online-case-information 2/2

Case 1:20-cv-00589-LY Document 1-4 Filed 06/03/20 Page 3 of 3