Exhibit 99.3

LOGO

Managements Discussion and Analysis

(All figures are in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share and convertible debenture values or where otherwise noted)

Management of Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (APUC), the corporation continuing the business of the Algonquin Power Income Fund (the Fund), has prepared the following
discussion and analysis to provide information to assist its shareholders understanding of the financial results for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2009. This Managements Discussion and Analysis
(MD&A) should be read in conjunction with APUCs audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the notes thereto. This material is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com
and on the APUC website at www.AlgonquinPowerandUtilities.com. Additional information about APUC, including the most recent Annual Information Form can be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

This MD&A is based on information available to management as of February 27, 2010.

Caution concerning forward looking statements and non-GAAP Measures

Certain statements
included herein contain forward-looking information within the meaning of certain securities laws. These statements reflect the views of APUC with respect to future events, based upon assumptions relating to, among others, the performance of
APUCs assets and the business, interest and exchange rates, commodity market prices, and the financial and regulatory climate in which it operates. These forward looking statements include, among others, statements with respect to
the expected performance of APUC, its future plans and its dividends to shareholders. Statements containing expressions such as outlook, believes, anticipates, continues, could,
expect, may, will, project, estimates, intend, plan and similar expressions generally constitute forward-looking statements.

Since forward-looking statements relate to future events and conditions, by their very nature they require APUC to make assumptions and involve inherent
risks and uncertainties. APUC cautions that although it believes its assumptions are reasonable in the circumstances, these risks and uncertainties give rise to the possibility that our actual results may differ materially from the expectations set
out in the forward-looking statements. Material risk factors include the continued volatility of world financial markets; the impact of movements in exchange rates and interest rates; the effects of changes in environmental and other laws and
regulatory policy applicable to the energy and utilities sectors; decisions taken by regulators on monetary policy; and the state of the Canadian and the United States (U.S.) economies and accompanying business climate. APUC cautions
that this list is not exhaustive, and other factors could adversely affect results. Given these risks, undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of their dates. APUC reviews material forward-looking
information it has presented, at a minimum, on a quarterly basis. Although APUC believes that the assumptions inherent in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on these statements, which apply only as
of these dates. APUC is not obligated to nor does it intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by law.

The terms adjusted net earnings and adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (Adjusted
EBITDA) are used throughout this MD&A. The terms adjusted net earnings and Adjusted EBITDA are not recognized measures under Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). There is no standardized measure
of adjusted net earnings and Adjusted EBITDA, consequently APUCs method of calculating these measures may differ from methods used by other companies and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other
companies. A calculation and analysis of adjusted net earnings and Adjusted EBITDA can be found throughout this MD&A.



---

Conversion to a Corporation

On October 27, 2009, the Fund completed a transaction (the Unit Exchange Offer) which provided the Funds unitholders the opportunity to exchange their trust units of the Fund, on a
one-for-one basis, for common shares of an existing corporation. This existing corporation, Hydrogenics Corporation, transferred all of its operations and existing shares to a new corporation pursuant to a Plan of Arrangement prior to completion of
the Unit Exchange Offer. The name of Hydrogenics Corporation was changed to Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. following closing of the transaction.

The transaction resulted in the unitholders of the Fund becoming shareholders of APUC, with no changes to the Funds underlying business operations. Under the continuity of interest method of
accounting, APUCs transfer of assets, liabilities and equity of the Fund are recorded at their net book value in APUCs financial statements as at October 27, 2009. As a result of this conversion, certain terms such as
shareholder/unitholder and dividend/distribution may be used interchangeably throughout this MD&A. Prior to October 27, 2009, all distributions to unitholders were in the form of trust unit distributions. References to APUC shall mean the
Fund with respect to activities and results occurring prior to October 27, 2009 and shall mean APUC with respect to activities and results occurring on or after October 27, 2009.

Overview

APUC is a corporation
incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act. APUC produces stable earnings through a diversified portfolio of renewable energy and utility businesses owned and operated by its subsidiary entities. APUC conducts its business primarily
through two businesses:

The first, conducting business as Algonquin Power Co. (APCo), generates electrical energy through a
diverse portfolio of clean, renewable power generation and thermal power generation facilities across North America. As at December 31, 2009, APCo owns 41 hydroelectric facilities operating in Ontario, Québec, Newfoundland, Alberta, New
York State, New Hampshire, Vermont and New Jersey with a combined generating capacity of 140 MW. APCo also owns a 99 MW wind farm in Manitoba. The renewable energy facilities are generally facilities operating under long term power purchase
agreements with major utilities and have an average remaining contract life of 16 years. APCos 11 thermal energy facilities operate under power purchase agreements (PPAs) and have an average remaining contract life of 7
years with a combined generating capacity of 321 MW.

The second, Liberty Water Co. (Liberty Water) provides water and wastewater
utility services through 18 water distribution and wastewater utility systems in the United States. Liberty Water provides regulated water distribution and wastewater facilities in Arizona, Illinois, Missouri and Texas. These utility operating
companies are regulated investor-owned utilities subject to regulation, including rate regulation, by the public utility commissions of the states in which they operate.

Business Strategy and Recent Developments

APUCs business strategy is to maximize
long term shareholder value as a dividend paying, growth oriented corporation actively competing within its clearly defined business sectors. APUC is committed to delivering a total shareholder return comprised of a dividend augmented by capital
appreciation arising through growth in earnings and dividends. Through an emphasis on sustainable, long view renewable power and utility investments, over a medium term planning horizon APUC strives to deliver annualized earnings growth
exceeding 5% and is committed to growing its dividend supported by such earnings.

Independent Power:APCo develops and operates a
diversified portfolio of electrical energy generation facilities. Within this business there are three distinct divisions: Renewable Energy, Thermal Energy and Development. The Renewable Energy division operates APCos hydroelectric and wind
power facilities. The Thermal Energy division operates co-generation, energy from waste, steam production and other thermal facilities. The Development division seeks to deliver continuing growth to APCo through the development of



2



---

APCos greenfield power generation projects, accretive acquisitions of electrical energy generation facilities as well as development of organic growth opportunities within APCos
existing portfolio of renewable energy and thermal energy facilities. The renewable power and thermal energy generation business of APCo is managed with an emphasis on growth through the development of green-field projects and opportunities within
APCos existing portfolio. This involves building on APCos expertise in the origination of greenfield renewable energy projects, building upon APCos existing portfolio of assets for further growth, and capitalizing on opportunities
that may emerge in the current turbulence of the capital markets.

Regulated Water Utilities: In 2009, APUC branded all of its
utilities under the Liberty Water brand. Liberty Water is committed to being the leading utility provider of safe, high quality and reliable water and wastewater services while providing stable and predictable earnings from its utility operations.
Liberty Water delivers long term shareholder value by profitably owning and operating investor owned water and wastewater utilities providing safe, reliable transportation and delivery of water and wastewater treatment in its service areas. It is
also focused on delivering continued growth in earnings by identifying opportunities which accretively expand its business portfolio.

Regulated Electrical Utilities:APUC has announced its plan to establish a third distinct business subsidiary focused on the provision of local regulated electrical generation and distribution utilities within a new business
subsidiary to be called Liberty Electric. In this regard APUC announced plans to co-acquire an electrical generation and regulated distribution utility through a strategic partnership with Emera Inc. (Emera) (see Electrical
Distribution Utility Acquisition).

During fiscal 2009, APUC made monthly cash dividends/distributions to shareholders/unitholders of
$0.02 per share/trust unit per month or $0.24 per share/trust unit per annum. This level of dividends/cash distributions allows for both an immediate return on investment for shareholders/unitholders and retention of sufficient cash within APUC to
fund growth opportunities, debt repayment and mitigate the impact of volatility in foreign exchange rates. APUC strives to achieve its results within a moderate risk profile consistent with top-quartile North American power, utility, and
infrastructure operations. Effective January 1, 2010, APUC changed to a quarterly dividend from a monthly dividend. As a result, APUC anticipates declaring a per share dividend for the first quarter of 2010 of $0.06, which is the equivalent of
the current per share dividend of $0.02 per month. The first quarterly record date is expected to be March 31, 2010, with a payment date on or about April 15, 2010.

Major Highlights in 2009

Converted to a Corporation

During 2009 APUC completed its conversion from an income trust to a corporation. The conversion was completed through a series
of transactions more fully described below.

On October 27, 2009 the Funds unitholders exchanged 100% of the
outstanding trust units of the Fund for a new class of common shares (New Common Shares) of APUC (formerly Hydrogenics Corporation or Hydrogenics), an existing corporation. Immediately prior to this exchange (the Unit Exchange
Offer), Hydrogenics, under a Plan of Arrangement, transferred all of its operations and substantially all of its assets and liabilities to New Hydrogenics. The pre-existing publicly traded shares of Hydrogenics were contemporaneously redeemed
for shares of New Hydrogenics and thus the pre-existing publicly traded shares of Hydrogenics no longer exist.

The transaction
resulted in the unitholders of the Fund holding their interest in the Fund as shareholders of APUC. Excluding shares issued under the CD Exchange Offer (as defined and described below), the number of common shares of APUC outstanding immediately
after completion of the Unit Exchange Offer was exactly the same as the number of the Funds trust units outstanding immediately before the Unit Exchange Offer.



3



---

The Unit Exchange Offer was accounted for as a change in business form using the continuity
of interests method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, the transfer of the assets, liabilities and equity of the Fund are recorded at their net book values in the financial statements of APUC as at October 27, 2009, the effective
date of the transaction. As a result, APUC is required to be accounted for as though it were a continuation of the Fund but with its capital reflecting the exchange of APUC shares for trust units. For the periods reported up to the effective date of
the Unit Exchange Offer all payments to unitholders were in the form of trust unit distributions and after that date all payments to shareholders were in the form of dividends.

APUC paid New Hydrogenics $10,813 and has accrued an additional amount of $494 as a final closing adjustment. As a result of the Unit
Exchange Offer, together with substantively enacted changes in tax rates in December 2009, APUC recognized a future income tax asset of $60,014 and a deferred credit in relation to this asset of $49,879 as at December 31, 2009. For accounting
purposes the deferred credit is recorded as a credit to tax expense when the future tax assets are realized.

Also as a result
of the completion of the Unit Exchange Offer, APUC recorded an increase to its recorded future tax liability. This adjustment reflects the tax impact of recording future tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences in APUCs
flow-through entities that are reversing or settling prior to 2011 which were previously not recorded since prior to the transaction these temporary difference reversals were not expected to be taxed in APUC.

APUC expensed allocated transaction costs of $3,460 during 2009 in relation to the Unit Exchange Offer.

Internalized APUC Management

On December 21. 2009, the Board of Directors of APUC (the Board) reached agreement with the shareholders of Algonquin Power Management Inc. (the Manager or APMI)
to internalize all management functions of the Fund which were provided by the Manager. APUC will acquire the interest previously held by the Manager in the management services agreement, subject to regulatory and shareholder approval, with
consideration to be paid in the form of issuance of 1,158,748 APUC shares (the Shares). An independent advisor retained by the Board concluded that the consideration to be paid by APUC pursuant to the transaction is fair, from a
financial point of view. The expense has been measured at $4,693 using a price for each share of $4.03, the adjusted closing market price on December 21 2009, the date the agreement was ratified.

Effective as of December 21, 2009, Mr. Ian Robertson assumed overall responsibility for APUCs operations as Chief Executive
Officer and will be invited to join the Board. Mr. Robertson previously held the position of Executive Director, Business Development with the Fund. Mr. Chris Jarratt has joined the Strategy Development Committee where he is co-directing
the development of strategy with APUC management and will be invited to join the Board in the role of Vice Chairman. Mr. David Kerr has been retained to provide transitional services to APUC.

In accordance with the policies of the Toronto Stock Exchange, approval of the issuance of the Shares will be sought from shareholders at the
next annual general meeting. The beneficial interest in the Shares of those individuals who are continuing in management roles with APUC is intended to create and maintain alignment with the interests of APUCs shareholders.

Addressed Near Term Debt Maturities - Exchange of Convertible Debentures

During the second quarter of 2009, the Board of Trustees of the Fund also announced that, in conjunction with the Unit Exchange Offer,
holders of the Funds convertible debentures would be provided the opportunity to exchange their debentures for new debentures of APUC (the CD Exchange Offer).



4



---

Contemporaneously with the Unit Exchange Offer on October 27, 2009, holders of the
Funds convertible debentures exchanged their convertible debentures for convertible debentures or common shares of APUC resulting in the Funds debentureholders becoming debentureholders and shareholders of APUC and the maturity date of
the Series 1 Debentures being extended from 2011 to 2014.

Pursuant to the CD Exchange Offer, $63,755 of the outstanding Series
1 Debentures were exchanged for Series 1A Debentures in a principal amount of $66,943, and $21,209 of the outstanding Series 1 Debentures were exchanged for 6,607,027 shares of APUC. In addition, all of the outstanding Series 2 Debentures were
exchanged for Series 2A Debentures in a principal amount of $59,967. (See Shareholders Equity and Convertible Debentures).

Strengthened Balance Sheet - $75 Million Offering of Common Shares and Convertible Debentures

On December 2, 2009, APUC completed, on a bought deal basis, an offering of 5,980,000 common shares at $3.35 per common share for gross proceeds of $20,033 and an offering for $55,000 principal
amount of 7% convertible unsecured subordinated debentures due June 30, 2017 (the Series 3 Debentures). The underwriters of the offering also exercised in full an over-allotment option to purchase an additional 897,000 common shares
and $8,250 principal amount of Series 3 Debentures on the same terms. As a result of the closing of the main offering and the over-allotment option, APUC raised an aggregate of $82,606 in net proceeds after underwriting expenses and before
additional issuance costs ($86,288 in gross proceeds).

The Series 3 Debentures bear interest at a rate of 7% per annum
payable semi-annually in arrears on the last day of June and December in each year commencing on June 30, 2010, and will mature on June 30, 2017. The Series 3 Debentures will be convertible at the holders option into common shares of
APUC at a conversion price of $4.20 per common share (See  Shareholders Equity and Convertible Debentures).

Expanded Regulated Utility Business - Electrical Distribution Utility Acquisition

On
April 23, 2009, APUC announced that it plans to co-acquire an electrical generation and regulated distribution utility through a strategic partnership with Emera Inc. (Emera). APUC and Emera will each own 50% of the newly
formed California Pacific Electric Company, LLC (Calpeco), a California limited liability company, which intends to acquire the California-based electricity distribution and related generation assets (the California Utility)
of NV Energy, Inc. for the purchase price of approximately US $116 million, subject to certain working capital and other closing adjustments. APUC and Emera will jointly own and operate the California Utility through Calpeco. The California
Utility currently provides electric distribution service to approximately 47,000 customers in the Lake Tahoe region. In October 2009, an application was filed with the California Public Utilities Commission requesting approval of the
transaction in which NV Energy has agreed to sell its California electric distribution and generation assets to Calpeco. The transaction is subject to state and federal regulatory approval which is expected to occur in the latter half of 2010.

As an element of the California Utility strategic partnership, Emera has also agreed to a conditional treasury subscription of
approximately 8.5 million shares of APUC at a price of $3.25 per share. Delivery of the shares under the subscription receipts is conditional on and is planned to occur simultaneously with the closing of the acquisition of the California
Utility.

As of December 31, 2009, APUC has incurred costs of $1.1 million related to the acquisition of the California
Utility. These costs are recorded as deferred transaction costs in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.



5



---

Expanded Renewable Energy Portfolio  Tinker Hydro-electric Generating Asset
Acquisition

Subsequent to December 31, 2009, on January 12, 2010, APUC completed the acquisition of 36.8
MW of electrical generating assets (the Tinker Assets) that was announced on November 10, 2009. The Tinker Assets are located in New Brunswick and Maine and were purchased after satisfying the conditions of the acquisition,
including regulatory approval.

Through the purchase of shares and assets, APCo has acquired three hydroelectric generating
stations, the 34.5MW Tinker Hydro, a hydroelectric generating facility with sufficient reservoir storage capability to move significant amounts of energy from off-peak to on-peak generation located on the Aroostook River near the Town of
Perth-Andover, New Brunswick, Caribou Hydro, a 0.9MW run-of-river hydroelectric generating facility located in Northern Maine and Squa Pan Hydro, a 1.4MW run-of-river hydroelectric generating facility located in Northern Maine.

APCo has also acquired five thermal generating facilities with a rated capacity of 40MW in Northern Maine and New Brunswick utilized for
installed reserve capacity, not continuous generation, New Brunswick Public Utilities Board regulated transmission lines and interconnections which allow direct and indirect access to multiple electricity markets (Northern Maine ISA, New Brunswick
ISO, New England ISO).

In connection with the acquisition of the Tinker Assets, on February 4, 2010, APCo acquired a
number of load supply and energy procurement contracts in northern Maine and the Independent System Operator New England (ISO-NE) market (Energy Services Business). It is anticipated that the majority of the energy sold by
the Energy Services Business will be supplied through generation from the Tinker Assets, based on historical long term average levels of hydroelectric energy generation of these facilities. The Energy Services Business involves Standard Offer
contracts for the supply of energy to commercial and industrial customers in northern Maine, as well as energy purchase obligations with the ISO NE required to supplement self-generated energy.

The Energy Services Business is based on a series of short-term energy supply agreements which generally will expire within the next 14
months. These include energy sales to a town in New Brunswick, Standard Offer Service contracts with three local electric utilities in northern Maine, and a series of direct energy contracts with commercial buyers also in northern Maine.

The hydroelectric and thermal generation assets offer capacity to support the energy services obligations in northern Maine. The
acquisition improves hydrologic diversification through a new geographical area to the APCo generation portfolio and builds APCos Eastern Canadian generating presence.

Improved Utility Customer Service  Developed Liberty Water Brand

During the 2009, the 18 individual water and waste water utilities owned by APUC were reorganized under the consolidated brand of Liberty
Water with the objective of improving the quality and consistency of services provided to the organizations approximately 70,000 regulated water/wastewater utility customers through updated web customer service, paperless electronic billing
and expanded service hours. A secondary objective of aggregating APUCs water utility operations under the Liberty Water brand is to support the transparent analysis of APUCs water utility business as compared to other publicly traded US
based water utility businesses.

Improved Corporate Governance  Expanded Board

At the annual general meeting of unitholders of the Fund held on July 27, 2009, in addition to the re-election of existing trustees,
Mr. Huskilson was elected as a trustee of the Fund. As part of the Unit Exchange Offer, the trustees of the Fund also became directors of APUC. The Board and management of APUC believe that Mr. Huskilsons utility and power
experience will make a strong addition to the Board and will support APUCs long term strategy and corporate governance activities. As part of the management internalization process, Mr. Robertson and Mr. Jarratt have been invited to
join the Board.



6



---

APUCs slate of proposed Directors in respect of the election of Directors by
shareholders at the annual general meeting shall continue to be determined by the Directors in accordance with APUCs governance policies and procedures. It is contemplated that Mr. Robertson and Mr. Jarratt will stand for election as
Directors at the next annual general meeting of shareholders.

Annual consolidated results from operations

Key Selected Annual Financial Information



|                                                     |  |                        |           |      |   |         |      |  |   |        
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | -------
|                                                     |  | Year ended December 31
|                                                     |  | 2009                   |           | 2008 |   |         | 2007
|Revenue                                              |  | $                      | 187,265   |      | $ | 213,796 |      |  | $ | 186,175
|Adjusted EBITDA2                                     |  | $                      | 79,368    |      | $ | 90,028  |      |  |   | 86,169 
|Cash provided by Operating Activities                |  |                        | 50,022    |      |   | 77,223  |      |  |   | 40,427 
|Net earnings (loss)                                  |  |                        | 31,257    |      |   | (19,038 | )    |  |   | 24,763 
|Adjusted net earnings2                               |  |                        | 30,503    |      |   | 18,788  |      |  |   |        
|Dividends/Distributions to Shareholders/Unitholders1 |  |                        | 19,322    |      |   | 57,755  |      |  |   | 69,923 
|Per share/trust unit:                                |  |                        |           |      |   |         |      |  |   |        
|Net earnings                                         |  | $                      | 0.39      |      | $ | (0.25   | )    |  |   | 0.34   
|Adjusted net earnings2                               |  | $                      | 0.38      |      | $ | 0.25    |      |  |   |        
|Diluted net earnings (loss)                          |  | $                      | 0.39      |      | $ | (0.25   | )    |  |   | 0.31   
|Cash provided by Operating Activities                |  | $                      | 0.63      |      | $ | 1.03    |      |  |   | 0.55   
|Dividends/Distributions to Shareholders/Unitholders  |  | $                      | 0.24      |      | $ | 0.75    |      |  |   | 0.92   
|Total Assets                                         |  |                        | 1,013,413 |      |   | 978,515 |      |  |   | 954,067
|Long Term Debt                                       |  |                        | 241,412   |      |   | 293,590 |      |  |   | 281,725



|1 | Includes dividends/distributions to APUC shareholders/unitholders and distributions to Airsource units exchangeable into Fund units.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2 | APUC uses Adjusted EBITDA to enhance assessment and understanding of the operating performance of APUC without the effects of depreciation and
amortization expense which are derived from a number of non-operating factors, accounting methods and assumptions. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure - see applicable section later in this MD&A and the caution regarding non-GAAP measures
on page 1.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the year ended December 31, 2009, APUC reported total revenue of $187.3 million as compared to $213.8
million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $26.5 million or 12.4%. The decrease in APUC revenue in the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 was primarily the result of $23.3 million in lower APCo revenue due to reduced average
energy rates, lower demand for steam at the Sanger and Windsor Locks facilities in the Thermal Energy division, and $6.8 million lower revenue due to lower weighted average energy rates and lower average hydrology and wind resources in the Renewable
Energy division, as compared to the same period in 2008. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $2.5 million due to the Brampton Cogeneration Inc. (BCI) facility being operational in the APCo Thermal Energy division as
compared to the same period in 2008 as BCI commenced operations in June 2008. APUC reported increased revenue of $5.3 million from U.S. operations as a result of the weaker Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008. A more detailed
analysis of these factors is presented within the business unit analysis. APCo attributes the reduced average energy rates to the overall effect the economic slow down has had on energy prices primarily in New York and New England where its hydro
electric plants sell merchant power. APCo attributes lower revenue at its Sanger and Windsor Locks facilities to lower gas prices and to lower demand from the steam hosts resulting from the recession in the U.S.



7



---

For the year ended December 31, 2009, APUC experienced an average U.S. exchange rate of approximately
$1.142 as compared to $1.067 in the same period in 2008. As such, any year over year variance in revenue or expenses, in local currency, at any of APUCs U.S. entities are affected by a change in the average exchange rate, upon conversion to
APUCs reporting currency. Although a weaker Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar has an impact on both revenue and expenses generated by its U.S. subsidiaries, APUCs foreign exchange forward contracts partially offset the impact
on earnings (see Risk Management).

Adjusted EBITDA in the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 totalled $79.4 million as compared to
$90.0 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $10.7 million or 12%. The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA is primarily related to $8.8 million in lower earnings from operations primarily resulting from lower gas prices and reduced demand for
steam in the APCo Thermal Energy division and lower average energy rates earned by the APCo Renewable Energy divisions U.S. facilities. A more detailed analysis of these factors is presented within the reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net
earnings set out below (see Non-GAAP Performance Measures).

For the year ended December 31, 2009, net earnings totalled $31.3 million as
compared to net loss of $19.0 million during the same period in 2008. Net earnings per share/trust unit totalled $0.39 for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to net loss per share/trust unit of $0.25 during the same period in 2008.

The increase in net earnings as compared to 2008 was primarily the result of a change in income of $65.5 million due to unrealized mark to
market gains on derivative financial instruments partially offset by losses on derivative financial instruments contracts settled in the period, as a result of decreased interest rates and the weaker Canadian dollar.

Unrealized mark to market losses on derivative financial instruments resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates relate to contract periods which
extend to fiscal 2013. Unrealized mark to market losses on derivative financial instruments resulting from changes in interest rates relate to contract periods which extend to fiscal 2015. The following chart provides a summary of the period over
period changes between realized and unrealized mark to market gains and losses of derivative financial instruments:



|                                                                          |  |                       |         |   |      |   |        |        |  |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------ | ------ |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                          |  | Year endedDecember 31 |         |   |      |  
|                                                                          |  | 2009                  |         |   | 2008 |   |        | Change | 
|Foreign Exchange Contracts:                                               |  |                       |         |   |      |   |        |        |  |   |         |  
|Unrealized mark to market loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments |  | $                     | (15,682 | ) |      | $ | 25,473 |        |  | $ | (41,155 | )
|Realized loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments                  |  |                       | 284     |   |      |   | (5,077 | )      |  | $ | 5,361   |  
|                                                                          |  |                       |         |   |      |   |        |        |  |   |         |  
|                                                                          |  | $                     | (15,398 | ) |      | $ | 20,396 |        |  | $ | (35,794 | )
|Interest Rate Swap Contracts:                                             |  |                       |         |   |      |   |        |        |  |   |         |  
|Unrealized mark to market loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments |  | $                     | (7,424  | ) |      | $ | 16,953 |        |  | $ | (24,377 | )
|Realized loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments                  |  |                       | 5,504   |   |      |   | 399    |        |  | $ | 5,105   |  
|                                                                          |  |                       |         |   |      |   |        |        |  |   |         |  
|                                                                          |  | $                     | (1,920  | ) |      | $ | 17,352 |        |  | $ | (19,272 | )
|                                                                          |  |                       |         |   |      |   |        |        |  |   |         |  
|Derivative Financial Instruments Total:                                   |  |                       |         |   |      |   |        |        |  |   |         |  
|Unrealized mark to market loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments |  | $                     | (23,106 | ) |      | $ | 42,426 |        |  | $ | (65,532 | )
|Realized loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments                  |  |                       | 5,788   |   |      |   | (4,678 | )      |  | $ | 10,466  |  
|                                                                          |  |                       |         |   |      |   |        |        |  |   |         |  
|Total loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments                     |  | $                     | (17,318 | ) |      | $ | 37,748 |        |  | $ | (55,066 | )
|                                                                          |  |                       |         |   |      |   |        |        |  |   |         |  

In addition, net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2009 increased $4.9 million from reduced interest expense due
to lower rates on APUCs variable interest rate debt booked in the period, $5.3 million due to non-cash gains on foreign exchange resulting from the weaker Canadian dollar and $18.8 million related to a recovery in future income taxes primarily
due to the conversion to a corporation from an income trust, changes in future income tax rates, tax losses on U.S. operations resulting from bonus depreciation and lower energy and natural gas prices as compared to the same period in 2008 and the
recovery of non-deductible interest expense related to U.S. operations. These increases were partially offset by $6.5 million related to the write down of certain thermal assets, $4.7 million related to the costs associated with the internalization
of management, $3.5 million related to corporatization costs, $2.0 million due to increased amortization expense, $8.8 million due to



8



---

lower earnings from operating facilities, $1.3 million due to increased administrative expenses and $5.9 million resulting from increased minority interest gains at the St. Leon facility
primarily due to unrealized gains on financial instruments.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, cash provided by operating
activities totalled $50.0 million or $0.63 per share/trust unit as compared to cash provided by operating activities of $77.2 million, or $1.03 per share/trust unit during the same period in 2008. Cash provided by operating activities exceeded
dividends/distributions by 2.6 times during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 1.4 times during the same period in 2008. The change in cash provided by operating activities after changes in working capital in the twelve
months ended December 31, 2009 is primarily due to increased realized losses from derivative instruments and decreased earnings from operating facilities, as compared to the same period in 2008.

2009 Fourth quarter results from operations

Key Selected Quarterly Financial Information



|                                                    |  |                               |           |   |      |   |         |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | --------- | - | ---- | - | ------- | -
|                                                    |  | Three months endedDecember 31 |          
|                                                    |  | 2009                          |           |   | 2008 |  
|Revenue                                             |  | $                             | 43,441    |   |      | $ | 56,505  |  
|Adjusted EBITDA2                                    |  | $                             | 18,027    |   |      | $ | 23,256  |  
|Cash provided by Operating Activities               |  |                               | 12,549    |   |      |   | 24,752  |  
|Net earnings                                        |  |                               | (1,366    | ) |      |   | (21,095 | )
|Adjusted net earnings2                              |  |                               | 11,504    |   |      |   | 8,839   |  
|Dividend/distributions to Shareholders/Unitholders1 |  |                               | 4,998     |   |      |   | 5,312   |  
|Per share/trust unit                                |  |                               |           |   |      |   |         |  
|Net earnings                                        |  | $                             | (0.03     | ) |      | $ | (0.28   | )
|Adjusted net earnings2                              |  | $                             | 0.14      |   |      | $ | 0.12    |  
|Diluted net earnings                                |  | $                             | (0.03     | ) |      | $ | (0.28   | )
|Cash provided by Operating Activities               |  | $                             | 0.15      |   |      | $ | 0.32    |  
|Dividends/distributions to Shareholders/Unitholders |  | $                             | 0.06      |   |      | $ | 0.06    |  
|Total Assets                                        |  |                               | 1,013,413 |   |      |   | 978,515 |  
|Long Term Debt                                      |  |                               | 241,412   |   |      |   | 293,590 |  



|1 | Includes dividends/distributions to APUC shareholders/unitholders and Airsource units exchangeable into Fund units.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2 | APUC uses Adjusted EBITDA to enhance assessment and understanding of the operating performance of APUC without the effects of depreciation and
amortization expense which are derived from a number of non-operating factors, accounting methods and assumptions. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure - see applicable section later in this MD&A and the caution regarding non-GAAP measures
on page 1.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the three months ended December 31, 2009, APUC reported total revenue of $43.4 million as compared to
$56.5 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $13.1 million or 23%. The decrease in APUC revenue in the three months ended December 31, 2009 was primarily the result of a decrease of $4.1 million due to reduced average energy
rates and lower demand for steam at the Sanger and Windsor Locks facilities in the APCo Thermal Energy division and a $2.8 million decrease due to lower weighted average energy rates and lower average hydrology and wind resources in the APCo
Renewable Energy division, as compared to the same period in 2008. In addition, APUC reported decreased revenue of $4.4 million from U.S. operations as a result of the stronger Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008. A more detailed
analysis of these factors is presented within the business unit analysis.

For the three months ended December 31, 2009, APUC experienced
an average U.S. exchange rate of approximately $1.057 as compared to $1.212 in the same period in 2008. As such, any year over year variance in revenue or expenses, in local currency, at any of APUCs U.S. entities are affected by a change in
the average exchange rate, upon conversion to APUCs reporting currency. Although a stronger Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar has an impact on both revenue and expenses generated by its U.S. subsidiaries, APUCs foreign exchange
forward contracts in place partially offset the impact on earnings (see Risk Management).



9



---

Adjusted EBITDA in the three months ended December 31, 2009 totalled $18.0 million as compared to $23.3
million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $5.2 million or 22%. The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA is in part due to lower earnings from operations primarily resulting from lower gas prices and reduced demand for steam in the Thermal Energy
division and lower average energy rates earned by the Renewable Energy divisions U.S. facilities. A more detailed analysis of these factors is presented within the reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net earnings set out below (see Non-GAAP
Performance Measures).

For the three months ended December 31, 2009, net loss totalled $1.4 million as compared to a net loss of $21.1
million during the same period in 2008. Net loss per share/trust unit totalled $0.03 for the three months ended December 31, 2009, as compared to net loss per share/trust unit of $0.28 during the same period in 2008.

The increase in net earnings as compared to 2008 was primarily the result of a change in income of $33.5 million due to unrealized mark to market gains on
derivative financial instruments partially offset by losses on derivative financial instruments contracts settled in the period, as a result of increased interest rates and the stronger Canadian dollar.

Unrealized mark to market losses on derivative financial instruments resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates relate to contract periods which
extend to fiscal 2013. Unrealized mark to market losses on derivative financial instruments resulting from changes in interest rates relate to contract periods which extend to fiscal 2015. The following chart provides a summary of the period over
period changes between realized and unrealized mark to market gains and losses of derivative financial instruments:



|                                                                          |  |                               |        |   |      |   |        |  |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------ |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                          |  | Three months endedDecember 31 |        |   |     
|                                                                          |  | 2009                          |        |   | 2008 |   | Change | 
|Foreign Exchange Contracts:                                               |  |                               |        |   |      |   |        |  |   |         |  
|Unrealized mark to market loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments |  | $                             | (1,261 | ) |      | $ | 17,583 |  | $ | (18,844 | )
|Realized loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments                  |  |                               | (148   | ) |      |   | 345    |  | $ | (493    | )
|                                                                          |  |                               |        |   |      |   |        |  |   |         |  
|                                                                          |  | $                             | (1,409 | ) |      | $ | 17,928 |  | $ | (19,337 | )
|Interest Rate Swap Contracts:                                             |  |                               |        |   |      |   |        |  |   |         |  
|Unrealized mark to market loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments |  | $                             | (1,627 | ) |      | $ | 13,058 |  | $ | (14,685 | )
|Realized loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments                  |  |                               | 1,520  |   |      |   | 139    |  | $ | 1,381   |  
|                                                                          |  |                               |        |   |      |   |        |  |   |         |  
|                                                                          |  | $                             | (107   | ) |      | $ | 13,197 |  | $ | (13,304 | )
|                                                                          |  |                               |        |   |      |   |        |  |   |         |  
|Derivative Financial Instruments Total:                                   |  |                               |        |   |      |   |        |  |   |         |  
|Unrealized mark to market loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments |  | $                             | (2,888 | ) |      | $ | 30,641 |  | $ | (33,529 | )
|Realized loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments                  |  |                               | 1,372  |   |      |   | 484    |  | $ | 888     |  
|                                                                          |  |                               |        |   |      |   |        |  |   |         |  
|Total loss/(gain) on derivative financial instruments                     |  | $                             | (1,516 | ) |      | $ | 31,125 |  | $ | (32,641 | )
|                                                                          |  |                               |        |   |      |   |        |  |   |         |  

In addition, net earnings for the three months ended December 31, 2009 increased by $6.7 million related to a recovery
in future income taxes primarily due to the reasons outlined in the discussion of the annual results, above and $2.6 million due to non-cash gains resulting from the stronger Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008. These items were
partially offset by decreases of $1.1 million due to lower earnings on portfolio investments, $4.4 million due to lower earnings from operating facilities, $6.5 million related to the write down of certain thermal assets, $4.7 million related to the
internalization of management, $3.5 million related to corporatization costs, $2.1 million resulting from increased minority interest gains at the St. Leon facility primarily due to unrealized gains on financial instruments and $0.2 million due to
increased amortization expense as compared to the same period in 2008.



10



---

During the three months ended December 31, 2009, cash provided by operating activities totalled $12.5
million or $0.15 per share/trust unit as compared to cash provided by operating activities of $24.8 million, or $0.32 per share/trust unit during the same period in 2008. Cash provided by operating activities exceeded dividends/distributions by 2.4
times during the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 5.3 times during the same period in 2008. The change in cash provided by operating activities after changes in working capital in the three months ended December 31, 2009, is
primarily due to increased realized losses from derivative instruments and decreased cash flow from operating facilities, as compared to the same period in 2008.

Outlook

APCo

APCos Renewable Energy division is expected to perform at or below long term average resource conditions in the first quarter of 2010 with the
exception of the Quebec and New England regions where APCo anticipates at or above long term average resource conditions. APCo is expecting an improvement in weighted average energy rates at its U.S. renewable facilities as compared to the rates
experienced in the first quarter of 2009. The 2010 first quarter results will include results from the acquisition of three hydroelectric generating stations with a capacity of 36.8 MW located in New Brunswick and Maine. The energy produced by
these facilities will be shown as the Maritime Region.

APCo Thermal Energy divisions Energy-From-Waste (EFW) facility
is expected to operate below APCos expectations during the first quarter of 2010 due to an unplanned outage in January 2010 related to problems with boiler and economizer tubes. The facility is expected to be operational in
spring 2010 once the boiler and economizer tube issues are resolved. APCo is accelerating capital maintenance originally planned for the second and third quarters of 2010 during this outage which should allow the facility to make up some of
the income expected to be lost in the first quarter in the remainder of 2010.

APCo Thermal Energy divisions Sanger
facility is expected to operate at or above APCos expectations for the first quarter of 2010 in line with 2009 results. APCos power development team will continue to pursue new opportunities for power generation projects in
both Canada and the U.S. APCo will continue to focus on cost containment and productivity improvement measures that will maximize margins and EBITDA throughout 2010.

APCo Thermal Energy divisions Windsor Locks facility is expected to operate at or above APCos expectations for the first quarter of 2010 and in line with 2009 results. In the second
quarter APCo expects Windsor Locks to perform in line with 2009 results until the power purchase agreement with Connecticut Light & Power (CL&P) expires in April 2010 after which APCo expects to be able to sell between 10MW
and 40MW of electrical capacity to a local utility or provide ancillary services such as spinning reserves to the ISO-NE. For a more detailed description of the options and expected impact see Development Division - Windsor Locks.

Liberty Water

Liberty Water has ongoing rate cases at a number of its utilities and will continue to process these rate cases throughout 2010. These rate cases are discussed in further detail within this MD&A (see Liberty Water:
Outlook). An exact determination of increased revenues from all rate case applications is not possible at this time as the timing of conclusion to the rate cases and the final decision on rate increases are determined by the regulator. As
a result of delays in the progress of rate cases through the regulatory processes, Liberty Water now anticipates that approximately $7 million of additional revenue from rate cases will be achieved in 2010 but the full annualized increase in
revenues determined through the rate case processes is expected to be achieved in 2011.

The regulatory reviews of the rates and tariffs for
these facilities are expected to conclude in early 2010, with the new rates and tariffs implemented and/or going into effect in the first half of 2010, depending on the state in which the relevant facility operates. The business unit will also
continue to consider accretive water and wastewater utility acquisition opportunities, as well as acquisitions in other regulated utilities, such as electricity distribution.



11



---

With respect to growth, Liberty Water is expecting limited organic expansion due to the slowdown in the U.S.
housing market. Liberty Water expects to deliver growth through the acquisition of an additional small utility system.

LOGO

APCo: Renewable Energy



|                                                   |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |           |   |  |   |           |  
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ------- | - | ------------------------------ | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | --------- | - |  | - | --------- | -
|                                                   |  | Three months endedDecember 31 |         |   | Twelve months endedDecember 31 |  
|                                                   |  | 2009                          |         |   | 2008                           |   |         | 2009 |  |   | 2008      |  
|Performance (MW-hrs sold)                          |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |           |   |  |   |           |  
|Quebec Region                                      |  |                               | 73,650  |   |                                |   | 78,720  |      |  |   | 299,900   |   |  |   | 320,025   |  
|Ontario Region                                     |  |                               | 32,775  |   |                                |   | 33,072  |      |  |   | 141,825   |   |  |   | 147,125   |  
|Manitoba Region                                    |  |                               | 89,625  |   |                                |   | 105,643 |      |  |   | 364,500   |   |  |   | 377,450   |  
|New England Region                                 |  |                               | 16,200  |   |                                |   | 21,066  |      |  |   | 81,725    |   |  |   | 84,950    |  
|New York Region                                    |  |                               | 24,750  |   |                                |   | 25,461  |      |  |   | 95,000    |   |  |   | 92,000    |  
|Western Region                                     |  |                               | 10,875  |   |                                |   | 12,790  |      |  |   | 58,200    |   |  |   | 69,050    |  
|                                                   |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |           |   |  |   |           |  
|Total                                              |  |                               | 247,875 |   |                                |   | 276,752 |      |  |   | 1,041,150 |   |  |   | 1,090,600 |  
|Revenue                                            |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |           |   |  |   |           |  
|Energy sales                                       |  | $                             | 16,604  |   |                                | $ | 19,175  |      |  | $ | 68,227    |   |  | $ | 75,549    |  
|Expenses                                           |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |           |   |  |   |           |  
|Operating expenses                                 |  |                               | (6,619  | ) |                                |   | (6,160  | )    |  |   | (22,279   | ) |  |   | (22,015   | )
|Other income                                       |  |                               | 433     |   |                                |   | 507     |      |  |   | 1,226     |   |  |   | 1,477     |  
|                                                   |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |           |   |  |   |           |  
|Division operating profit (including other income) |  | $                             | 10,418  |   |                                | $ | 13,522  |      |  | $ | 47,174    |   |  | $ | 55,011    |  

As APCos hydroelectric
generating facilities in the New York and New England regions primarily sell their output at market rates, the average revenue earned per MW-hr sold can vary significantly from the same period in the prior year. APCos facilities in the other
regions are subject to varying rates, by facility, as set out in each facilitys individual power purchase agreement (PPA). As such, while most of APCos PPAs include annual rate increases, a change to the weighted average
production levels resulting in higher average production from facilities which earn lower energy rates can result in a lower weighted average energy rate earned by the division, as compared to the same period in the prior year.

2009 Annual Operating Results

For the year
ended December 31, 2009 the Renewable Energy division produced 1,041,150 MW-hrs of electricity, as compared to 1,090,600 MW-hrs produced in the same period in 2008, a decrease of 4.5%. The production level in 2009, while slightly lower than the
previous year still represents production levels above long term averages. The production in the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 represents sufficient renewable energy to supply the equivalent of 57,800 homes on an annualized basis with
renewable power.

Using new standards of thermal generation, as a result of renewable energy production, the equivalent of 575,000 tons of CO2
gas was prevented from entering the atmosphere in 2009.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, the division generated electricity equal
to 102% of long term projected average resources (wind and hydrology) as compared to 107% during the same period in 2008. In 2009, a number of regions experienced resources at significantly higher levels than long term average, including the Quebec
region which was 8% above long term averages, the New England region, which was 33% above long



12



---

term averages and the New York region, which was 9% above long term averages. Several regions experienced resources at or below long term averages, including the Western region which was 13%
below long term average resources, the Ontario region which was 7% below long term average resources and the Manitoba region which was 2% below long term average resources.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, revenue from energy sales in the Renewable Energy division totalled $68.2 million, as compared to $75.5 million during the same period in 2008. Revenue from
APCos U.S. facilities decreased $4.0 million due to a decrease in weighted average energy rates of approximately 36% in the New England and New York regions, partially offset by an increase of $0.1 million due to higher than average hydrology,
as compared to the same period in 2008. Revenue from APCos Canadian hydroelectric facilities decreased $2.2 million due to lower average hydrology, partially offset by an increase of $0.3 million due to an increase in weighted average energy
rates of approximately 0.9% and, as compared to the same period in 2008. Revenue from the Manitoba region decreased $0.8 million due to a weaker wind resource and $0.2 million due to a decrease in weighted average energy rates of approximately 0.7%,
as compared to the same period in 2008. The division reported an increase in revenue of $0.4 million from U.S. operations as a result of the weaker Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, operating expenses totalled $22.2 million, as compared to $22.0 million during the same period in 2008, an
increase of $0.2 million. Operating expenses were impacted by $0.4 million of increased repair and maintenance costs at the St. Leon facility resulting from scheduled payments under the extended warranty and operation and maintenance agreements with
Vestas-Canadian Wind Technology Inc. (Vestas), increased operational and administrative expenses of $0.3 million, an increase of $0.2 million resulting from increased Canadian property taxes, an increase of $0.2 million resulting from
increased repair and maintenance expenses incurred on Canadian facilities, partially offset by decreased variable operating costs of $0.9 million tied to lower revenue associated with U.S. facilities as compared to the same period in 2008. Operating
expenses include costs of $2.1 million associated with the pursuit of various growth and development activities, a reduction of $0.2 million as compared to the same period in 2008. The division reported increased expenses of $0.5 million from U.S.
operations as a result of the weaker Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008.

For the year ended December 31, 2009,
Renewable Energys operating profit totalled $47.2 million, as compared to $55.0 million during the same period of 2008, representing a decrease of 14.2%. For the year ended December 31, 2009, Renewable Energys operating profit did
not meet APCos expectations primarily due to lower than expected weighted average energy rates in the U.S.

2009 Fourth Quarter
Operating Results

For the quarter ended December 31, 2009 the Renewable Energy division produced 247,875 MW-hrs of electricity, as
compared to 222,700 MW-hrs produced in the same period in 2008, an increase of 11.3%. The level of production in 2009 represents sufficient renewable energy to supply the equivalent of 55,100 homes on an annualized basis with renewable power. Using
new standards of thermal generation, as a result of renewable energy production, the equivalent of 138,000 tons of CO2 gas was prevented from entering the atmosphere in the fourth quarter of 2009.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the division generated electricity equal to 93% of long term projected average resources (wind and
hydrology) as compared to 105% during the same period in 2008. A number of regions experienced resources at significantly higher levels than long term averages, including the New York region, which was 8% above long term averages and the New England
region, which was 16% above long term averages. The Western region experienced results 18% below long term average resources, the Manitoba region experienced results 16% below long term averages, and the Ontario region experienced results 15% below
long term averages in the quarter ended December 31, 2009.



13



---

For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, revenue from energy sales in the Renewable Energy division
totalled $16.6 million, as compared to $19.2 million during the same period in 2008. Revenue from APCos U.S. facilities decreased $0.3 million due to a decrease in weighted average energy rates of approximately 17% in the New England region
and $0.3 million due to decreased average hydrology, as compared to the same period in 2008. Revenue from the Manitoba region increased $0.1 million due to an increase in weighted average energy rates of approximately 1.3%, offset by a decrease of
$1.0 million due to a weaker wind resource, as compared to the same period in 2008. Revenue from APCos Canadian facilities decreased $0.7 million due to lower energy production, partially offset by $0.4 million due to an increase in weighted
average energy rates as compared to the same period in 2008. The division reported decreased revenue of $0.5 million from U.S. operations as a result of the stronger Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008.

For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, operating expenses totalled $6.6 million, as compared to $6.2 million during the same period in 2008, a
decrease of $0.4 million. Operating expenses were impacted by $0.3 million of increased expenses at the St. Leon facility, primarily resulting from scheduled payments under the extended warranty and operation and maintenance agreements with Vestas,
increased operational and administrative expenses of $0.2 million, $0.1 million resulting from increased U.S. property taxes, partially offset by decreased variable operating costs of $0.1 million tied to lower revenue associated with U.S.
facilities, as compared to the same period in 2008. Operating expenses include costs of $0.9 million associated with the pursuit of various growth and development activities, as compared to $0.8 million in the same period in 2008. The division
reported decreased expenses of $0.3 million from U.S. operations as a result of the stronger Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008.

For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, Renewable Energys operating profit totalled $10.4 million, as compared to $13.5 million during the same period of 2008, representing a decrease of 23.0%. For the quarter ended
December 31, 2009, Renewable Energys operating profit did not meet APCos expectations primarily due to lower than expected weighted average energy rates in the U.S. and a lower wind resource.

Divisional Outlook  Renewable Energy

The APCo Renewable Energy division is expected to perform at or below long term average resource conditions in the first quarter of 2010 with the exception of the Quebec and New England regions where APCo anticipates at or above long
term average resource conditions.

On January 12, 2010, APCo completed the acquisition of three hydroelectric generating stations located
in New Brunswick and Maine with installed capacity of 36.8MW, which include, most notably, the 34.5MW Tinker Hydroelectric station located on the Aroostook River near the Town of Perth-Andover, New Brunswick. The energy produced by these facilities
will be shown as the Maritime Region in the first quarter of 2010.

In connection with the Tinker acquisition which closed January 12,
2010, on February 4, 2010, APUC acquired the Energy Services Business which provides energy to commercial and industrial customers in the northern Maine and New Brunswick markets. The Energy Services Business anticipates that, based on the
expected load forecast for its existing contracts, it will provide approximately 150,000 MW-hrs of energy to its customers at an average rate of $80/MW-hr on an annualized basis. Based on historical long term average levels of hydroelectric energy
generation, the Tinker Assets are anticipated to provide greater than 80% of the energy required by the Energy Services Business to service its customers which provide a natural hedge on supply costs of the Energy Services Business.

In addition to the energy generation provided by the Tinker Assets, the Energy Services Business anticipates buying additional energy on the open market in
order to services its customer demand. APCo manages the risk associated with this business through internally generated energy from the Tinker Assets, as well as, through the purchase of fixed volume/prices from the ISO NE market. In
addition, APCO negotiates appropriate consumption volumes and pricing indexes with large retail and wholesale consumers in northern Maine to ensure risk associated with volatility of consumption by the consumer is mitigated.



14



---

As a result of certain legislation passed in Quebec (Bill C93), APCos Renewable Energy division is
required to undertake technical assessments of eleven of the twelve hydroelectric facility dams owned or leased within the Province of Quebec. In the first quarter of 2010 APCo expects to complete the required assessments necessary to determine
the work required and estimate capital cost of compliance with the legislation. APCo is required to submit plans for undertaking any remedial measures that are identified to comply with the legislation. As a result of nine completed and
two partially completed assessments, APCo has estimated capital expenditures of approximately $17.5 million related to compliance with the legislation. The timing of when the actual capital costs need to be made is determined as part of the
technical assessments.

APCo anticipates that these expenditures will be invested over the next five years as follows:



|                                         |  |        |  |       |  |       |  |       |  |       |  |      
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----- |  | ----- |  | ----- |  | ----- |  | -----
|                                         |  | Total  |  | 2010  |  | 2011  |  | 2012  |  | 2013  |  | 2014 
|Estimated Bill C-93 Capital Expenditures |  | 17,500 |  | 5,000 |  | 6,000 |  | 1,200 |  | 2,800 |  | 2,500

The majority of these capital costs
are associated with the Donnacona, St. Alban and Mont-Laurier facilities. APCo does not anticipate any significant impact on power generation or associated revenue while the dam safety work is ongoing. APCo continues to explore several
alternatives to mitigate the capital costs of the modifications, including cost sharing with other stakeholders and revenue enhancements which can be achieved through the modifications.

APCo: Thermal Energy Division



|                                                                  |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ------- | - | ------------------------------ | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                  |  | Three months endedDecember 31 |         |   | Twelve months endedDecember 31 |  
|                                                                  |  | 2009                          |         |   | 2008                           |   |         | 2009 |  |   | 2008    |  
|Performance (MW-hrs sold)                                         |  |                               | 147,482 |   |                                |   | 145,050 |      |  |   | 571,505 |   |  |   | 597,923 |  
|Performance (tonnes of waste processed)                           |  |                               | 42,189  |   |                                |   | 42,348  |      |  |   | 161,102 |   |  |   | 161,198 |  
|Revenue                                                           |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Energy sales                                                      |  | $                             | 13,819  |   |                                | $ | 21,806  |      |  | $ | 62,209  |   |  | $ | 82,959  |  
|Less:                                                             |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Cost of Sales  Fuel *                                            |  |                               | (5,224  | ) |                                |   | (11,597 | )    |  |   | (26,517 | ) |  |   | (44,706 | )
|                                                                  |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net Energy Sales Revenue                                          |  | $                             | 8,595   |   |                                | $ | 10,209  |      |  | $ | 35,692  |   |  | $ | 38,253  |  
|Waste disposal sales                                              |  |                               | 3,786   |   |                                |   | 3,998   |      |  |   | 14,468  |   |  |   | 15,706  |  
|Other revenue                                                     |  |                               | 545     |   |                                |   | 1,691   |      |  |   | 3,848   |   |  |   | 4,349   |  
|                                                                  |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Total net revenue                                                 |  | $                             | 12,926  |   |                                | $ | 15,898  |      |  | $ | 54,008  |   |  | $ | 58,308  |  
|Expenses                                                          |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Operating expenses *                                              |  |                               | (7,121  | ) |                                |   | (8,807  | )    |  |   | (30,782 | ) |  |   | (32,515 | )
|Interest and other income                                         |  |                               | 872     |   |                                |   | 868     |      |  |   | 3,749   |   |  |   | 3,665   |  
|                                                                  |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Division operating profit(including interest and dividend income) |  | $                             | 6,677   |   |                                | $ | 7,738   |      |  | $ | 26,975  |   |  | $ | 31,053  |  



|* | Cost of Sales  Fuel consists of natural gas and fuel costs at the Sanger and Windsor Locks facilities, where changes in these costs are passed to the customer in
the energy price.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2009 Annual Operating Results

In 2009, the EFW facility processed 161,102 tonnes of municipal solid waste as compared to 161,198 tonnes processed in the same period of 2008. This level of production resulted in the diversion of
approximately 117,600 tonnes of waste from landfill sites in 2009.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, the business unit
produced 571,505 MW-hrs of energy as compared to 597,923 MW-hrs of energy in the comparable period of 2008, a decrease of 4.4%. The business units performance decreased by 4,300 MW-hrs at the Sanger facility resulting from power curtailment by
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) due to line loading issues on the utility side and 7,500 MW-hrs at the Windsor Locks facility due to reduced demand for steam from its steam host customer, as compared to the same period in
2008. The overall decrease in energy production at the EFW facility is due to steam generated



15



---

by the incineration process at the facility now being utilized by BCI for steam sales to a nearby industrial customer rather than being used to generate electricity. During the twelve months
ended December 31, 2009, the business units BCI steam sales facility was operating for the full period having reached commercial operation in June 2008. Although this has resulted in the decrease in electrical generation from EFWs
steam turbine of 16,300 MW-hrs, the decrease was more than offset by the new steam sales by BCI. Throughput at the EFW facility remained consistent with the same period in 2008.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, gross revenue in the Thermal Energy division totalled $80.5 million, as compared to $103.0 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $22.5 million.
As natural gas expense is a significant revenue driver and component of operating expenses, the division compares net energy sales revenue (energy sales revenue less natural gas expense) as a more appropriate measure of the
divisions results. During the year ended December 31, 2009, net energy sales revenue at the Thermal Energy division totalled $35.7 million, as compared to $38.3 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $2.6 million. The
decrease in revenue from net energy sales, as compared to the first twelve months of 2008, was primarily due to the Sanger facility experiencing a decrease of $5.6 million as a result of decreased energy rates, in part due to lower natural gas
prices, and $0.7 million as a result of decreased production and decreased revenue at the Windsor Locks facility of $16.1 million as a result of lower energy rates, in part due to lower natural gas prices, and $0.9 million as a result of decreased
demand for steam production as compared to the same period in 2008. The offsetting reduction in natural gas expense at the Sanger and Windsor Locks facilities is discussed in detail below. In addition, revenue decreased $1.1 million at the
landfill-gas (LFG) facilities primarily as a result of lower energy rates and $1.0 million at the EFW facility as a result of a portion of the steam generated by the incineration process being used by BCI instead of being used to
generate electricity. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $2.5 million as a result of the BCI steam sales facility achieving commercial operation in June 2008, as compared to the same period in 2008. The division reported
increased revenue of $2.2 million from operations as a result of the weaker Canadian dollar, as compared to the same period in 2008.

Revenue
from waste disposal sales for the year ended December 31, 2009 totalled $14.5 million, as compared to $15.7 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $1.2 million. The facility earned lower average rates for each tonne of waste
processed in the quarter, primarily the result of the arrangement to process higher priced airline waste at the facility ceasing in December 2008.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, fuel costs at Sanger and Windsor Locks totalled $26.5 million, as compared to $44.7 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $18.2 million. Natural gas expense at Sanger decreased $4.9
million (52%), primarily the result of a 50% decrease in the average price for natural gas as compared to the same period in 2008. In addition, production decreased 3%, primarily as a result of production curtailments by PG&E, decreasing the
volume of natural gas used in ongoing operation of the facility as compared to the same period in 2008. Natural gas expense at the Windsor Locks facility decreased $14.2 million (44%), primarily the result of a 44% decrease in the average price for
natural gas as compared to the same period in 2008. The division reported increased fuel costs of $0.9 million as a result of the weaker Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, operating expenses, excluding fuel costs at Windsor Locks and Sanger, totalled $30.8 million, as compared to
$32.5 million in the same period in 2008. Operating expenses for the period were impacted by decreased operating expenses of $0.6 million at the EFW facility primarily as a result of lower natural gas expenses and repair and maintenance expenses,
$0.5 million at the hydro-mulch facility primarily resulting from reduced repair and maintenance costs and $0.5 million primarily due to decreased repair and maintenance costs at the Valley Power facility, as compared to the prior period. Expenses
at the LFG facilities decreased $2.2 million due to lower operating, royalty, repair, maintenance and natural gas expenses as compared to the same period in 2008. In 2008 expenses at the LFG facilities included $0.6 million of costs associated with
its investment in the landfill gas tax credit program which did not occur in 2009. These decreases were partially offset by increased expenses at the Windsor Locks facility primarily due to $0.4 million in costs associated with compliance with the
greenhouse gas initiatives and $0.7 million of operating costs of the BCI steam facility as compared to the same period in 2008. The reported operating costs at the BCI facility exclude the cost of purchasing steam from the EFW facility as this is
eliminated upon consolidation. The division reported increased operating expenses of $0.7 million from U.S. operations as a result of the weaker Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008.



16



---

For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Thermal Energy divisions operating profit totalled
$27.0 million, as compared to $31.1 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $4.1 million or 13.1%. Operating profit in the Thermal Energy division did not meet overall expectations for 2009, due to weaker gas prices and lower demand
for steam from the divisions co-generation assets resulting from the current economic slow down in the U.S.

2009 Fourth Quarter
Operating Results

In the fourth quarter of 2009, the EFW facility processed 42,189 tonnes of municipal solid waste as compared to 42,348
tonnes processed in the same period of 2008, a decrease of 0.4%. This level of production resulted in the diversion of approximately 30,700 tonnes of waste from landfill sites in the fourth quarter of 2009.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the business unit produced 147,482 MW-hrs of energy as compared to 145,050 MW-hrs of energy in the
comparable period of 2008. During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the business units performance increased by 700 MW-hrs at the Windsor Locks facility, 2,100 MW-hrs at the Sanger facility and 1,500 MW-hrs at the Valley Power facility
as compared to the same period in 2008. During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the BCI steam facility used more EFW steam in its operations, resulting in a decrease in electrical generation from EFWs steam turbine of 1,000 MW-hrs.
Throughput at the EFW facility was consistent with the same period in 2008.

For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, revenue in the
Thermal Energy division totalled $18.2 million, as compared to $27.5 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $9.3 million. As natural gas expense is a significant revenue driver and component of operating expenses, the division
compares net energy sales revenue (energy sales revenue less natural gas expense) as a more appropriate measure of the divisions results. For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, net energy sales revenue at the Thermal Energy
division totalled $8.6 million, as compared to $10.2 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $1.6 million. The decrease in revenue from energy sales was primarily due to a decrease of $0.7 million at the Sanger facility as a result of
decreased energy rates, in part due to lower natural gas prices, partially offset by $0.3 million as a result of increased production, and a decrease of $4.8 million at the Windsor Locks facility as a result of decreased energy rates, in part due to
lower natural gas prices, partially offset by $0.1 million as a result of increased demand for steam production, as compared to the same period in 2008. The offsetting reduction in natural gas expense at the Sanger and Windsor Locks facilities is
discussed in detail below. The division reported decreased revenue of $2.7 million from operations as a result of the stronger Canadian dollar, as compared to the same period of 2008.

Revenue from waste disposal sales for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 totalled $3.8 million, as compared to $3.9 million during the same period in 2008. The facility earned lower average rates
for each tonne of waste processed in the quarter, primarily the result of the arrangement to process higher priced airline waste at the facility ceasing in December 2008.

For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, fuel costs at Sanger and Windsor Locks totalled $5.2 million, as compared to $11.6 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $6.4 million. Natural
gas expense at Sanger decreased $0.3 million (18%), primarily the result of a 22% decrease in the average price for natural gas as compared to the same period in 2008. Natural gas expense at the Windsor Locks facility decreased $4.4 million (55%),
primarily the result of a 56% decrease in the average price for natural gas as compared to the same period in 2008. The division reported decreased fuel costs of $1.7 million as a result of the stronger Canadian dollar as compared to the same period
in 2008.

For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, operating expenses, excluding fuel costs at Windsor Locks and Sanger, totalled $7.1
million, as compared to $8.8 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $1.7 million. The decrease in operating expenses for the quarter was primarily due to reduced operating costs of $0.5



17



---

million at the LFG facilities resulting from lower repair, maintenance, royalty and operating expenses, $0.2 million at BCI resulting from lower natural gas expenses and $0.3 million in lower
consumables and repair and maintenance expenses at the hydro-mulch facility as compared to the same period in 2008. The division reported decreased operating expenses of $0.6 million from U.S. operations as a result of the stronger Canadian dollar
as compared to the same period in 2008.

For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the Thermal Energy divisions operating profit totalled
$6.7 million, as compared to $7.7 million during the same period in 2008, representing a decrease of 13.0%. Operating profit in the Thermal Energy division did not meet overall expectations for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, due to weaker gas
prices and lower demand for steam from the Divisions co-generation assets resulting from the current economic slow down in the U.S.

Divisional Outlook  Thermal Energy

The EFW facility is expected to operate below expectations during the first quarter
of 2010 due to an unplanned outage in late January 2010 due to a failure with boiler and economizer tubes, some of which were scheduled for replacement as part of the current year capital expenditure plan. APCo intends to accelerate this replacement
and simultaneously advance capital maintenance originally planned for the second and third quarters of 2010 during the outage which should allow the facility to make up some of the income expected to be lost in the first quarter in the remainder of
2010. APCo estimates the outage will negatively impact operating profit from EFW in 2010 by approximately $1.2 million compared to its operating profit in 2009.

The Thermal Energy divisions Sanger facility is expected to operate at or above expectations for the first quarter of 2010 in line with 2009 results.

Windsor Locks is expected to operate at or above APCos expectations for the first quarter of 2010 and in line with 2009 results. In the second quarter
APCo expects Windsor Locks to perform in line with 2009 results until the power purchase agreement with Connecticut Light & Power (CL&P) expires in April 2010 after which APCo expects to be able to sell between 10MW and 40MW of
electrical capacity to a local utility or provide ancillary services such as spinning reserves to the ISO-NE. For a more detailed description of the options and expected impact see Development Division - Windsor Locks.

APCo: Development Division

The Development
division works to identify, develop and construct new, renewable and efficient energy generating facilities, as well as to identify, develop and construct other accretive projects that maximize the potential of APCos existing facilities.
Development is focused on projects within North America with a commitment to working proactively with all stakeholders, including local communities. The Development division is led by five full time employees who have access to, and support from,
all of APCos available resources to assist it in the development of projects. Typically, the division draws upon the support of the finance, engineering, technical services, and environmental and regulatory compliance groups. It also utilizes
existing industry relationships to assist in the identification, evaluation, development and construction of projects, and retains expertise, as required, from the financial, legal, engineering, technical, and construction sectors.

The Development division may also create opportunities through the acquisition of operating assets with accretive characteristics and prospective projects
that are at various stages of development. The Development division believes that the prevailing economic climate has also created opportunities for APCo to acquire third party development projects on terms that require the experience and financial
resources that APCo has at its disposal. The strategy is to focus on high quality renewable and high efficiency thermal energy generation projects that benefit from low operating costs using proven technology that can generate sustainable and
increasing cash flows in order to achieve a high return on invested capital.



18



---

APCos approach to project development is to maximize the utilization of internal resources while
minimizing external costs. This allows development projects to evolve to the point where most major elements and uncertainties of a project are quantified and resolved prior to the commencement of project construction. Major elements and
uncertainties of a project include the signing of a power purchase agreement, obtaining the required financing commitments to develop the project, completion of environmental permitting, and fixing the cost of the major capital components of the
project. It is not until all major aspects of a project are secured that APCo will begin construction.

Current Development Projects

Red Lily

APCo
continues to advance the Red Lily Wind Project in south-eastern Saskatchewan (the Project or Red Lily). In July 2008, a 25 MW PPA for the first phase of the Project (Phase I) was executed with SaskPower after
Phase I was successfully bid into a SaskPower Environmentally Preferred Power Strategy Request for Proposal. In June 2009, APCo and Natural Resources Canada (NRC) executed a Contribution Agreement under the ecoENERGY for Renewable
Power Program for Phase I, securing funding for the project in advance of the expectation of the program being fully subscribed later in 2009. APCo has submitted to NRC the Environmental Impact Assessment documentation for review in relation to
obtaining funding under the federal ecoENERGY program and is following up with NRC, as the lead agency, on comments received from other agencies. Notably, on April 13, 2009 Saskatchewan Environmental Assessment Branch confirmed that APCo
had satisfied the requirements under the Provincial Environmental Assessment Act for Phase I. APCo is currently awaiting confirmation of a development permit from the regional municipality of Martin.

APCo is considering a number of financing alternatives for Red Lily. Currently, the most likely alternative will see the Project financed through an
equity injection from a third party together with APCos participation arising in the Project solely through a subordinated debt commitment of up to $19.0 million. APCo would retain responsibility and receive fees in respect of the development,
construction, operation and supervision of the Project. After 5 years, APCo would have an option to subscribe for a 75% equity interest in the Project in exchange for its subordinated debt commitment.

On behalf of Red Lily, APCo is in the process of finalizing the contracts necessary to construct the project and has executed term sheets to secure all of
the required financing, with the anticipation that the funding will be available in the first quarter of 2010. The earliest expected commissioning date of the project is December 31, 2010. In addition to the focused effort on Phase I, APCo has
secured additional property and is assessing the viability of an expanded project. The viability of the expanded project will be conditional upon actual operating results from Phase I.

Successful development of wind projects such as Red Lily are subject to significant risks and uncertainties including the ability to obtain financing on
acceptable terms within deadlines imposed by the utility, reaching agreement with any other external parties involved in the project, currency fluctuations affecting the cost of major capital components such as wind turbines, price escalation for
construction labour and other construction inputs and construction risk that the project is built without mechanical defects and is completed on time and within budget estimates. Assuming the Project is developed, it is currently estimated to
require 16 turbines with a capital investment of approximately $65 million. Annual energy production from the wind farm is estimated to be 88,100 MW-hrs and annual gross revenue is estimated to be $8.5 million.



19



---

Windsor Locks

The Windsor Locks facility is a 54MW natural gas power generating station located in Windsor Locks, Connecticut. The facility was acquired in 2003 and currently has an outstanding net book value to APCo
of approximately US$17.2 million. The facility has two key energy agreements. The first agreement is the PPA with CL&P which expires in April 2010. The second agreement is the Energy Services Agreement (ESA) with Ahlstrom Windsor
Locks, LLC (Ahlstrom), a leading paper and non woven materials manufacturer, which, if not further extended by mutual agreement, will continue until 2017. The expiration of the CL&P PPA will impact operations beyond April 2010.

Commencing in April 2010, APCo will maximize net revenue by serving the steam and power requirements of Ahlstrom pursuant to the ESA together
with bidding the remaining available capacity of approximately 40 MW into the thirty minute forward operating reserve market (TMOR). APCo has entered into an agreement with Emera Energy Services Inc. to manage the off-take sales from
this facility into the ISO NE market.

APCo is continuing the preliminary engineering and environmental permitting work for the installation
of a new combustion gas turbine more appropriately sized to meet the electrical and steam requirements of Ahlstrom. APCo believes it is eligible to receive a one-time non-recurring grant from the State of Connecticut equivalent to US $450/KW to a
maximum of US $6.6 million to offset the cost of such re-powering. In addition to installing the new gas turbine, APCo would expect to continue to operate and maintain the existing equipment. Any investment in new capital for this site will be based
on an assessment of the incremental earnings against such additional investment.

The Development division currently anticipates operating
cash flow at the Windsor Locks facility for 2010 to be approximately U.S. $4.5 million compared to a historical cash flow of approximately U.S. $8.0 million. This operating cash flow estimate assumes participation in the summer 2010 and the winter
2010/2011 forward reserve auctions. TMOR has cleared at US $14 per MW month for the last 7 forward reserve procurement periods (two periods annually). During 2010, it is expected that APCo will earn revenue from steam and electrical sales to
Ahlstrom, steam and electrical capacity payments made by Ahlstrom, energy sales to ISO-NE, capacity payments made by ISO-NE and TMOR payments made by ISO-NE. Under this operating protocol APCo will need to acquire 750,000MMBTU to 835,000MMBTU of
natural gas annually in addition to the natural gas purchases reimbursed by Ahlstrom.

Other

APCo has completed preliminary engineering and a financial feasibility analysis on a 12 MW combined cycle high efficiency thermal energy generation project
located in Ontario. APCo believes this project is an excellent fit for the Minister of Energy and Infrastructures Directive to procure electricity from combined heat and power projects.

Future Development Projects  Greenfield Projects

There are a number of future greenfield development projects which are being actively pursued by the Development division. These projects encompass several new wind energy projects having a potential
generation capacity of over 250 MW, hydroelectric projects at different stages of investigation, and thermal energy generation projects. The projects being examined are located both in Canada and the United States.

In addition to the second phase of the Red Lily project, APCo is currently collecting wind data on three other sites in Saskatchewan and expects to respond
to the Provinces Request for Qualifications to procure up to 175MW of wind power from one or more independent power producers.

APCo
owns the rights, including land options, meteorological towers and historical wind data related to a potential 80 MW Canadian wind project. In the event the project is developed, it is currently estimated to require an investment of up to $250
million and is expected to require 2 to 3 years to complete.



20



---

In 2008, APCo made a strategic decision to maintain land option agreements for two wind projects in Quebec
in anticipation of future provincial tenders. In May 2009, Hydro Quebec released details in relation to a tender request for wind projects of a 25 MW maximum size. In addition, APCo has developed a relationship with two development
co-operatives comprised of landowners and other small investors for the potential development of a third and fourth project in response to the expected call for tender. Algonquin will assess the economics of these projects individually and will bid
into the RFP accordingly.

Discussions with the Ontario Power Authority indicate that energy procurement initiatives will be positively
influenced by the Green Energy Act (GEA) which received Royal Assent on May 14, 2009. The GEA is intended to provide the catalyst for the development of 50,000 new green economy jobs and is viewed by APCo as positive for the
development of renewable energy in Ontario. The Development division is maintaining relationships with potential partners for the development of a number of projects that could qualify under anticipated procurement initiatives undertaken by the
Ontario Power Authority in accordance with the GEA. In addition, APCo has applied to become applicant of record for three crown land sites under the Ministry of Natural Resources wind power site release programme, and has recently submitted 42
MW of on-shore wind energy projects in eastern Ontario under the GEAs Feed-in Tariff program (FIT). The on-shore wind price set by the FIT program is $0.135 per kWH.

Each project being contemplated is subject to a significant level of due diligence and financial modeling to ensure it satisfies return and diversification objectives established for the Development
division. Accordingly, the likelihood of proceeding with some or all of these projects depends on the outcome of due diligence, material contract negotiations, the structure of future calls for tender, and request for proposal programs. To
maximize APCos opportunities for development, new renewable and high efficiency thermal energy generating facilities are being pursued utilizing a variety of technologies and in diverse geographic locations.

Future Development Projects  Existing Facilities

The following sets out a summary of potential development projects at existing facilities which are being examined by the Development division.

Renewable Energy

The St. Leon Wind
Project achieved commercial operation status under its PPA with the Manitoba Hydro Electric Board in June 2006, and has been performing at or above expected levels of production. APCo is exploring multiple options to continue to build on the
success of this project including pursuing a future adjacent project and/or pursuing an increase in the installed capacity of the existing facility. The projects being reviewed have a potential generation capacity of over 85 MW. In the
event these projects are developed, it is currently estimated to require an investment of approximately $250 million.

Thermal Energy

The EFW facility in the Thermal Energy division of APCo is designed to incinerate over 500 tonnes per day of municipal solid waste
from the Region of Peel to produce steam that is used in the production of electricity and to supply the internal steam load for a nearby recycled paper board manufacturing mill. APCo established BCI to operate the required facilities to supply
steam to the nearby paper board customer and pursue additional steam load customers.

The Development division is currently reviewing several
proposals at the EFW facility to expand its power generation and waste processing throughput capacity. Throughput capacity could be expanded by between 40,000 and 100,000 tonnes annually depending on the proposal that is selected. If the
expansion is pursued, depending on the alternative chosen, an investment of between $60 million to $250 million would be required. APCo is currently evaluating the feasibility of an expanded facility including associated capital and operating costs
and financing terms. APCo is also engaged in discussions with the Region of Peel to establish a new long term contract for a reliable supply of municipal solid waste.



21



---

Divisional Outlook  Development

APCo believes that future opportunities for power generation projects will continue to arise given that many jurisdictions, both in Canada and the United States, continue to increase targets for renewable
and other clean power generation projects. In the past year the Ontario government passed the Green Energy Act. Accordingly the Ontario Power Authority has issued standard pricing for electricity from renewable sources under a Feed-in Tariff.
Included within this legislation is the requirement for Ontario Power Authority to purchase power generated from green energy projects, and an obligation for all utilities to grant priority grid access to such projects. The intention of the
legislation is to make development of renewable energy projects significantly easier than the prior process of formal bids in response to requests for proposals from the responsible power authority.

LOGO

LIBERTY WATER



|                                                        |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ------- | - | ------------------------------ | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                        |  | Three months endedDecember 31 |         |   | Twelve months endedDecember 31 |  
|                                                        |  | 2009                          |         |   | 2008                           |   |         | 2009 |  |   | 2008    |  
|Number of                                               |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Wastewater connections                                  |  |                               | 34,441  |   |                                |   | 34,190  |      |  |   | 34,441  |   |  |   | 34,190  |  
|Wastewater treated (millions of gallons)                |  |                               | 500     |   |                                |   | 450     |      |  |   | 1,925   |   |  |   | 1,850   |  
|Water distribution connections                          |  |                               | 36,919  |   |                                |   | 36,297  |      |  |   | 36,919  |   |  |   | 36,297  |  
|Water sold (millions of gallons)                        |  |                               | 1,400   |   |                                |   | 1,400   |      |  |   | 5,900   |   |  |   | 5,750   |  
|Assets for regulatory purposes (U.S. $)                 |  |                               | 147,767 |   |                                |   | 149,295 |      |  |   | 147,767 |   |  |   | 149,295 |  
|Revenue                                                 |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Wastewater treatment                                    |  | $                             | 4,872   |   |                                | $ | 5,393   |      |  | $ | 20,809  |   |  | $ | 19,120  |  
|Water distribution                                      |  |                               | 3,719   |   |                                |   | 4,336   |      |  |   | 17,179  |   |  |   | 15,609  |  
|Other Revenue                                           |  |                               | 96      |   |                                |   | 107     |      |  |   | 525     |   |  |   | 504     |  
|                                                        |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|                                                        |  | $                             | 8,687   |   |                                | $ | 9,836   |      |  | $ | 38,513  |   |  | $ | 35,233  |  
|Expenses                                                |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Operating expenses                                      |  |                               | (4,976  | ) |                                |   | (6,041  | )    |  |   | (23,158 | ) |  |   | (21,243 | )
|Other income                                            |  |                               | (43     | ) |                                |   | 55      |      |  |   | 1,368   |   |  |   | 102     |  
|                                                        |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Business Unit operating profit (including other income) |  | $                             | 3,668   |   |                                | $ | 3,850   |      |  | $ | 16,723  |   |  | $ | 14,092  |  

In 2009, Utility Services branded all
of its utilities under the Liberty Water brand. Liberty Water is committed to being the leading utility provider of safe, high quality and reliable water and wastewater services while providing stable and predictable earnings from its utility
operations.

Liberty Water reports total connections, inclusive of vacant connections rather than customers. Liberty Water had 34,441
wastewater connections as at December 31, 2009, as compared to 34,190 as at December 31, 2008, an increase of 251 year over year or 0.7%. Liberty Water had 36,919 water distribution connections as at December 31, 2009, as compared to
36,297 as at December 31, 2008, representing a year over year increase of 622 or 1.7%. Total connections include approximately 2,025 vacant wastewater connections and 1,475 vacant water distributions connections. Liberty Waters marginal
change in water distribution and wastewater treatment customer base during the period continues to primarily relate to limited organic growth at Liberty Waters facilities resulting from the slow down in U.S. new residential home sales in areas
served by the division.



22



---

Liberty Water has investments in regulatory assets of U.S. $147.8 million across four States as at
December 31, 2009, as compared to U.S. $149.3 million as at December 31, 2008 and has active proceedings in Texas and Arizona to allow it to earn its full regulatory return on its investment in regulatory assets.

2009 Annual Operating Results

During the
twelve months ended December 31, 2009, Liberty Water provided approximately 5.9 billion U.S. gallons of water to its customers, treated approximately 1.9 billion U.S. gallons of waste-water and sold approximately 475 million U.S. gallons
of treated effluent.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, Liberty Waters revenue totalled $38.5 million as compared to $35.2
million during the same period in 2008, an increase of $3.3 million. Revenue from wastewater treatment totalled $20.8 million, as compared to $19.1 million during the same period in 2008, an increase of $1.7 million. Revenue from water distribution
totalled $17.2 million, as compared to $15.6 million during the same period in 2008, an increase of $1.6 million. Liberty Water reported increased revenue from operations of $2.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2009 as a result of the
weaker Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, revenue increased U.S. $0.6 million or 1.8% as compared to the same period in 2008.

The twelve month water distribution revenue was impacted by increased revenue of $0.2 million at the four Texas Silverleaf facilities primarily due to the
ongoing rate cases and the related implementation of interim rate increases, in conjunction with increased customer demand and limited organic growth, $0.2 million at the Litchfield Park facility (LPSCo) primarily due to higher
commercial water sales, and $0.2 million due to organic growth and increased customer demand at 9 water distribution facilities as compared to the same period in 2008. Liberty Water reported increased water distribution revenue of $1.2 million in
the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 as a result of the weaker Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008.

The twelve
month wastewater treatment revenue was impacted by increased revenue of $0.4 million at the four Texas Silverleaf facilities and the Tall Timbers facility, primarily due to the ongoing rate cases and the related implementation of interim rate
increases in conjunction with increased customer demand and limited organic growth, $0.4 million at LPSCo primarily due to higher treated effluent revenue as compared to the same period in 2008. These increases were partially offset by decreased
wastewater treatment revenue of $0.4 million primarily resulting from a regulator imposed reduction in rates at the Gold Canyon facility and a decrease of $0.1 million due to decreased demand at the Rio Rico facility as compared to the same period
in 2008. Liberty Water reported increased wastewater treatment revenue of $1.4 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 as a result of the weaker Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, operating expenses totalled $23.2 million, as compared to $21.2 million during the same period in 2008. Liberty
Water reported higher expenses from operations of $1.7 million as a result of the weaker Canadian dollar, as compared to the same period in 2008. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, overall expenses increased U.S. $0.5 million or 2.3% as
compared to the same period in 2008.

Operating expenses increased $0.6 million as a result of increased wages, salary and other operating
costs, $0.3 million in reduced contracted service expenses, $0.2 million in reduced transportation costs, $0.2 million in reduced utilities and consumables and $0.2 million in decreased repair and maintenance costs as compared to the same period in
2008.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, Liberty Water earned other income of $1.4 million on the disposition of non-utility assets
with a book value of $1.1 million. During the comparable period in 2008, Liberty Water did not dispose of any significant other assets.

For
the year ended December 31, 2009, Liberty Waters operating profit totalled $16.7 million as compared to $14.1 million during the same period in 2008. Excluding the gain on disposition of other assets, operating profits increased by 9.0%.
Liberty Water operating profit exceeded expectations for the year ended December 31, 2009.



23



---

2009 Fourth Quarter Operating Results

During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, Liberty Water provided approximately 1.4 billion U.S. gallons of water to its customers, treated approximately 500 million U.S. gallons of wastewater
and sold approximately 100 million U.S. gallons of treated effluent.

For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, Liberty Waters
revenue totalled $8.7 million as compared to $9.8 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $1.1 million. Revenue from wastewater treatment totalled $4.9 million, as compared to $5.4 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of
$0.5 million. Revenue from water distribution totalled $3.7 million, as compared to $4.3 million during the same period in 2008, a decrease of $0.6 million. Liberty Water reported decreased revenue from operations of $1.2 million in the fourth
quarter of 2009 as a result of the stronger Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, revenue was consistent with the same period in 2008.

The fourth quarter water distribution revenue was impacted by increased revenue of $0.1 million at the four Texas Silverleaf facilities primarily due to the
ongoing rate cases and the related implementation of interim rate increases, offset by a decrease of $0.1 million at the Litchfield Park facility (LPSCo) primarily due to lower commercial water sales and $0.1 million due to lower
customer demand at 4 water distribution facilities as compared to the same period in 2008. Liberty Water reported decreased water distribution revenue of $0.5 million in the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as a result of the stronger Canadian
dollar as compared to the same period in 2008.

The fourth quarter wastewater treatment revenue was impacted by increased revenue of $0.3
million at the four Texas Silverleaf facilities and the Tall Timbers facility, primarily due to the ongoing rate cases and the related implementation of interim rate increases, $0.1 million at LPSCo primarily due to higher treated effluent revenue
as compared to the same period in 2008. These increases were partially offset by decreased wastewater treatment revenue $0.1 million primarily resulting from a regulator imposed reduction in rates at the Gold Canyon facility and $0.1 million due to
lower customer demand at the Rio Rico facility as compared to the same period in 2008. Liberty Water reported decreased wastewater treatment revenue of $0.7 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 as a result of the stronger
Canadian dollar as compared to the same period in 2008.

For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, operating expenses totalled $5.0
million, as compared to $6.0 million during the same period in 2008. Liberty Water reported lower expenses from operations of $0.8 million as a result of the stronger Canadian dollar, as compared to the same period in 2008. Excluding the impact of
foreign exchange, overall expenses decreased U.S. $0.3 million or 5.5% as compared to the same period in 2008.

Operating expenses decreased
$0.1 million in reduced contracted services expenses, $0.1 million in reduced utilities and consumables expenses and $0.6 million as a result of the capitalization of rate case costs of multiple rate cases which were previously expensed due to the
adoption of rate regulated accounting during the quarter, partially offset by an increase of $0.4 million as a result of increased wages, salary and other operating costs as compared to the same period in 2008.

For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, Liberty Waters operating profit totalled $3.7 million, comparable to the same period in 2008. Liberty
Waters operating profit exceeded expectations for the three months ended December 31, 2009.



24



---

Outlook  Liberty Water

Notwithstanding the slowdown in the U.S. economy, Liberty Water is not expecting any material reduction in customers in fiscal 2010. Liberty Water continues to provide water distribution and
wastewater collection and treatment services, primarily in the southern and southwestern U.S., in communities that have traditionally experienced long term growth and that provide continuing future opportunities for organic growth.

Liberty Water is proceeding through the regulatory process with rate cases relating to a number of its facilities. The Black Mountain facility filed a
rate case in December 2008 using a June 30, 2008 test year. The LPSCo facility filed a rate case in March 2009 using a September 2008 test year. The Rio Rico facility filed a rate case in May 2009, using a test year ended
December 31, 2008. The Bella Vista, Northern Sunrise and Southern Sunrise facilities filed rate cases in August 2009 using a March 31, 2009 test year. All of these facilities are located in Arizona. Five Texas facilities filed
rate cases in April 2009, and Woodmark in Texas filed in July 2009, all with test years ended December 31, 2008.

The following table
sets out some particulars with respect to the status of the rate cases as at February 15, 2010:



|                                           |  |                 |  |                                                                                  |  |                                                |  |                                       
|------------------------------------------ |  | --------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                                           |  | Test YearEnding |  | Status of Rate Case Application                                                  |  | EstimatedAnnual U.S. $RevenueIncrease as Filed |  | Estimated Timing of Rate
Increase     
|Facility                                   |  |                 |  |                                                                                  |  |                                                |  |                                       
|Arizona                                    |  |                 |  |                                                                                  |  |                                                |  |                                       
|Black Mountain                             |  | Q2 2008         |  | Hearing has concluded.Awaiting RecommendedOrder & Opinion                        |  | $ 0.9 million                                  |  | Q2 2010                               
|LPSCo                                      |  | Q3 2008         |  | Hearing has concluded.Awaiting RecommendedOrder & Opinion                        |  | $ 12.5 million                                 |  | Q2/Q3 2010                            
|Rio Rico                                   |  | Q4 2008         |  | Direct Testimony filed onFebruary 1, 2010 hearingscheduled for March 10-12, 2010 |  | $ 2.0 million                                  |  | Q3 2010                               
|Bella Vista, Northern and Southern Sunrise |  | Q1 2009         |  | Responding tointerrogatories, hearingscheduled for June 28  July 1, 2010        |  | $ 1.5 million                                  |  | Q4 2010                               
|Texas                                      |  |                 |  |                                                                                  |  |                                                |  |                                       
|Texas Utilities (Silverleaf  4 utilities) |  | Q4 2008         |  | Awaiting administrativehearing date                                              |  | $ 1.2 million                                  |  | Interim rates implemented October 2009
|Tall Timbers                               |  | Q4 2008         |  | Discovery period                                                                 |  | $ 0.2 million                                  |  | Interim rates implemented July 2009   
|Woodmark                                   |  | Q4 2008         |  | Public consultation period                                                       |  | $ 0.1 million                                  |  | Interim rates implemented January2010 

Rate cases ensure that a particular facility has the opportunity to recover its operating costs and earn a fair and reasonable return on its capital
investment as allowed by the regulatory authority under which the facility operates. Liberty Water monitors current and anticipated operating costs, capital investment and the rates of return in respect of each of its facility investments to
determine the appropriate timing of a rate case filing in order to ensure it fully earns a rate of return on its investments.

In Texas, the
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) allows the utilities customers a period of 90 days from the effective date of the proposed rates to object to the imposition of interim rates pending final rates determination. If
greater than 10% of a specific Texas utilitys customers object to the new proposed rates, the proposed rates would be subjected to a full regulatory hearing process administered over by the TCEQ in order to finalize the rates. If fewer than
10% of the customers record an objection to the proposed rates, those proposed rates are likely to be adopted and declared final as proposed. Any difference between the interim rates charged and collected and the final rates as approved by TCEQ
will be subject to a retroactive adjustment and refund on the customers subsequent monthly bill.



25



---

In July 2009, Tall Timbers implemented interim rates to customers in a portion of its service area as
applied for in its rate case application. The interim rates are being contested by various homeowner associations in Tall Timbers service area affected by the increase. These rates are expected to be finalized before the end of 2010 as
part of the normal regulatory process administered by the TCEQ.

In October 2009, the Texas Silverleaf utility began charging interim rates
based on its rate case applications. The interim rates are being contested by greater than 10% of the customers in the service area. These rates are expected to be finalized before the end of 2010 as part of the normal regulatory process
administered by the TCEQ.

In Arizona, the Arizona Corporate Commission requires a full regulatory process for all rate cases using a historic
test year. It is anticipated that the regulatory review of the proposed rates and tariffs for the Arizona facilities would be completed by mid-2010, with the new rates and tariffs in Arizona going into effect throughout 2010.

An exact determination of increased revenues from all rate case applications is not possible at this time as the timing of conclusion to the rate cases and
the final decision on rate increases are determined by the regulator. As a result of delays in the progress of rate cases through the regulatory processes, Liberty Water now anticipates that approximately $7 million of additional revenue from
rate cases will be achieved in 2010 but the full annualized increase in revenues determined through the rate case processes is expected to be achieved in 2011.

APUC: Corporate



|                                                |  |                               |   |  |                                |   |  |         |   |  |        |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | - |  | ------------------------------ | - |  | ------- | - |  | ------ | -
|                                                |  | Three months endedDecember 31 |   |  | Twelve months endedDecember 31 |  
|                                                |  | 2009                          |   |  | 2008                           |   |  | 2009    |   |  | 2008   |  
|Corporate and other expenses:                   |  |                               |   |  |                                |   |  |         |   |  |        |  
|Administrative expenses                         |  | 2,531                         |   |  | 2,812                          |   |  | 10,712  |   |  | 9,419  |  
|Management costs                                |  | 211                           |   |  | 224                            |   |  | 850     |   |  | 893    |  
|Write down of property and notes                |  | 6,457                         |   |  |                               |   |  | 6,457   |   |  |       |  
|Management internalization expense              |  | 4,693                         |   |  |                               |   |  | 4,693   |   |  |       |  
|Other corporatization expenses                  |  | 3,460                         |   |  |                               |   |  | 3,460   |   |  |       |  
|Loss / (Gain) on foreign exchange               |  | (258                          | ) |  | 2,339                          |   |  | (1,261  | ) |  | 4,018  |  
|Interest expense                                |  | 5,645                         |   |  | 5,711                          |   |  | 21,387  |   |  | 26,288 |  
|Interest, dividend and other Income             |  | (6                            | ) |  | (962                           | ) |  | (58     | ) |  | (1,779 | )
|Loss (gain) on derivative financial instruments |  | (1,515                        | ) |  | 31,126                         |   |  | (17,318 | ) |  | 37,748 |  
|Income tax expense (recovery)                   |  | (10,662                       | ) |  | (4,438                         | ) |  | (17,927 | ) |  | 308    |  

OVERVIEW

2009 Annual Corporate and Other Expenses

During the year ended December 31, 2009, administrative expenses totalled $10.7 million as compared to $9.4 million in the same period in 2008. The expense increase in the twelve months ended
December 31, 2009 was primarily due to increased costs associated with additional staff added requirements to administer APUCs operations as compared to the same period in 2008.

In December 2009, APCo decided to dispose of its investments in its remaining LFG facilities and its 50% ownership in the Drayton Valley facility. APCo
tested its investments for recoverability using a net realizable value valuation technique. As a result, Algonquin determined that these assets were impaired as at December 31, 2009. Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2009,
APCo recognized an impairment charge of $1.1 million against the outstanding principal balance of a note receivable related to its LFG operations. APUC also wrote down the carrying value of its remaining LFG facilities and its 50% investment in the
Valley Power facility to their estimated current fair value. This resulted in a write down of property and equipment of $4,854 in the period representing the difference between the carrying value of the assets and their net realizable values. Both
of these assets are currently reported under the Algonquin Power  Thermal Division reporting segment. These assets generated gross revenues of $4.3 million in 2009.



26



---

For the year ended December 31, 2009, APUC recorded an expense of $4.7 million with regards to an
agreement to acquire the Managers interest in the management services agreement and internalize management as compared to nil in the same period in 2008. On December 21, 2009, APUCs Board ratified an agreement in principal with the
shareholders of APMI to acquire the management contract and internalize management. Senior management expenses will be recorded within the Administrative Expense category on a go forward basis (See  Major highlights in 2009  Management
Internalization).

During the year ended December 31, 2009, APUC recorded an expense of $3.5 million associated with costs of converting
the Fund to a corporation as compared to nil in the same period in 2008. The expense in the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 primarily consists of $1.5 million related to professional fees associated with the unit exchange transaction
completed on October 27, 2009, increased capital taxes of $0.8 million as a result of the conversion to a corporation and an expense of $1.3 million associated with the exchange of the Series 1 Debentures for Series 1A Debentures (See 
Shareholders Equity and Convertible Debentures).

Foreign exchange gains and losses primarily represent unrealized gains or losses on U.S.
dollar denominated debt and do not impact APUCs current cash position. For purposes of evaluating divisional performance, APUC does not allocate the foreign exchange gains or losses to specific divisions as the change does not impact
APUCs current cash position or cash generated from operations. For the year ended December 31, 2009, APUC reported a foreign exchange gain of $1.3 million as compared to a loss of $4.0 million during the same period in 2008. The twelve
months ended December 31, 2009 experienced a decrease in value of the U.S. dollar of 15% which resulted in unrealized gains on APUCs U.S. denominated debt and working capital balances from its integrated U.S. operating facilities. The
comparable period in 2008 experienced an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar of 22%, which resulted in unrealized losses on APUCs U.S. denominated debt. As at December 31, 2009, APUC had approximately $32.5 million in U.S. dollar
denominated debt.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, interest expense totalled $21.4 million as compared to $26.3 million in the same
period in 2008. Decreased interest expense was primarily related to lower interest rates charged on APUCs variable interest rate credit facilities and lower average borrowings, as compared to the prior year.

Loss on derivative financial instruments consists of realized and unrealized mark to market losses on foreign exchange forward contracts and interest rate
swaps during the period. The unrealized portion of any mark to market gains or losses on derivative instruments does not impact APUCs current cash position.

On October 27, 2009, as a result of the Unit Exchange Offer, the Fund converted from a publicly traded income trust to a publicly traded corporation (see Major Highlights in 2009 - Conversion
to a Corporation). APUCs calculation of current and future income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2009 is based on the conversion to a corporate structure effective October 27, 2009, whereas APUCs calculation of
current and future income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2008 is based on APUC being a publicly traded income trust. An income tax recovery of $17.9 million was recorded in 2009, as compared to an expense of $0.3 million during the same
period in 2008. The primary reasons for this recovery relates to the conversion to a corporation from an income trust, decreases in expected future income tax rates, tax losses on U.S. operations resulting from bonus depreciation and lower energy
and natural gas prices as compared to the same period in 2008 and the recovery of non-deductible interest expense related to U.S. operations, partially offset by additional future income tax liabilities resulting from the temporary differences in
tax expenses related to CD and unit exchange issue costs and the reversal in the current year of unrealized losses on derivative financial instruments booked in the prior fiscal year. This resulted in an increased future tax recovery recorded in the
twelve months ended December 31, 2009. (see Risk Management  Changes to income tax laws).

2009 Fourth Quarter Corporate and
Other Expenses

During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, administrative expenses totalled $2.5 million, as compared to $2.8 million
in the same period in 2008. The expense increase in the three months ended December 31, 2009 primarily relates to added requirements to administer APUCs operations as compared to the same period in 2008.



27



---

In December 2009, APCo decided to exit its underperforming investments LFG facilities and Valley Power. See
the discussion in the annual corporate results section, above, for details related to this expense.

For the quarter ended December 31,
2009, APUC recorded an expense of $4.7 million with regards to an agreement to acquire the Managers interest in the management contract and internalize management as compared to nil in the same period in 2008. See the discussion in the annual
corporate results section and Major highlights in 2009  Management Internalization, above, for details related to this expense.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, APUC recorded an expense of $3.5 million associated with costs of converting the Fund to a corporation as compared to nil in the same period in 2008. The expense is discussed in more detail
in the annual corporate results section, above.

Foreign exchange gains and losses primarily represent unrealized gains or losses on U.S.
dollar denominated debt and do not impact current cash position. For purposes of evaluating divisional performance, APUC does not allocate the foreign exchange gains or losses to specific divisions as the change does not impact APUCs current
cash position or cash generated from operations. For the three months ended December 31, 2009, APUC reported a foreign exchange gain of $0.3 million as compared to a loss of $2.3 during the same period in 2008. The three months ended
December 31, 2009 experienced a decrease in value of the U.S. dollar of 2% which resulted in unrealized losses on APUCs U.S. denominated debt and working capital balances from its integrated U.S. operating facilities. The comparable
period in 2008 experienced an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar of 16%, which resulted in unrealized losses on APUCs U.S. denominated debt.

For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, interest expense totalled $5.6 million as compared to $5.7 million in the same period in 2008. Decreased interest expense was related to lower interest rates
charged on APUCs variable interest rate credit facilities and lower average borrowings, as compared to the prior year.

Loss on
derivative financial instruments consists of realized and unrealized mark to market losses on foreign exchange forward contracts and interest rate swaps during the quarter. The unrealized portion of any mark to market gains or losses on derivative
instruments does not impact APUCs current cash position.

An income tax recovery of $10.7 million was recorded in the three months ended
December 31, 2009, as compared to a recovery of $4.4 million during the same period in 2008. The primary reasons for this recovery are discussed in the annual income tax expense section above (see Risk Management  Changes to income tax
laws).

NON-GAAP PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net earnings

EBITDA is a non-GAAP metric used by many investors to compare companies on
the basis of ability to generate cash from operations. APUC uses these calculations to monitor the amount of cash generated by APUC as compared to the amount of dividends paid by APUC. APUC uses Adjusted EBITDA to assess the operating performance of
APUC without the effects of depreciation and amortization expense which are derived from a number of non-operating factors, accounting methods and assumptions. APUC believes that presentation of this measure will enhance an investors
understanding of APUCs operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be representative of cash provided by operating activities or results of operations determined in accordance with GAAP.



28



---

The following table is derived from and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Statement of
Operations. This supplementary disclosure is intended to more fully explain disclosures related to Adjusted EBITDA and provides additional information related to the operating performance of APUC. Investors are cautioned that this measure should not
be construed as an alternative to GAAP consolidated net earnings.



|                                                  |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ------- | - | ------------------------------ | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                  |  | Three months endedDecember 31 |         |   | Twelve months endedDecember 31 |  
|                                                  |  | 2009                          |         |   | 2008                           |   |         | 2009 |  |   | 2008    |  
|Net earnings (loss)                               |  | $                             | (1,366  | ) |                                |   | (21,095 | )    |  | $ | 31,257  |   |  | $ | (19,038 | )
|Add:                                              |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Income tax provision (recovery)                   |  |                               | (10,662 | ) |                                |   | (4,438  | )    |  |   | (17,927 | ) |  |   | 308     |  
|Write down of property and notes                  |  |                               | 6,457   |   |                                |   |        |      |  |   | 6,457   |   |  |   |        |  
|Management internalization expense                |  |                               | 4,693   |   |                                |   |        |      |  |   | 4,693   |   |  |   |        |  
|Other corporatization expenses                    |  |                               | 3,460   |   |                                |   |        |      |  |   | 3,460   |   |  |   |        |  
|Interest expense                                  |  |                               | 5,645   |   |                                |   | 5,712   |      |  |   | 21,387  |   |  |   | 26,288  |  
|(Gain) / loss on derivative financial instruments |  |                               | (1,515  | ) |                                |   | 31,126  |      |  |   | (17,318 | ) |  |   | 37,748  |  
|(Gain) / loss on foreign exchange                 |  |                               | (258    | ) |                                |   | 2,339   |      |  |   | (1,261  | ) |  |   | 4,018   |  
|Amortization                                      |  |                               | 11,350  |   |                                |   | 11,536  |      |  |   | 45,883  |   |  |   | 43,846  |  
|Other                                             |  |                               | 223     |   |                                |   | (1,924  | )    |  |   | 2,737   |   |  |   | (3,142  | )
|                                                  |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Adjusted EBITDA                                   |  | $                             | 18,027  |   |                                | $ | 23,256  |      |  | $ | 79,368  |   |  | $ | 90,028  |  
|                                                  |  |                               |         |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  

For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $5.2 million compared to the same period in 2008.
The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA in the quarter ended December 31, 2009 is primarily due to $4.4 million in lower earnings from operations and $1.1 million in decreased interest, dividend and other income earned in the year as compared to the
previous quarter.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $10.7 million compared to the same period in 2008.
The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA in the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 is due to $8.8 million in lower earnings from operations, $1.3 million in increased administration expenses and $0.6 million in decreased interest, dividend and other
income earned in the year.

Reconciliation of adjusted net earnings/(loss) to net earnings/(loss)

Adjusted net earnings is a non-GAAP metric used by many investors to compare net earnings from operations without the effects of certain volatile primarily
non-cash items that generally have no current economic impact and are viewed as not directly related to a companys operating performance. Net earnings/(loss) of APUC can be impacted positively or negatively by gains and losses on derivative
financial instruments, including foreign exchange forward contracts, interest rate swaps as well as to movements in foreign exchange rates on foreign currency denominated debt and working capital balances. APUC uses adjusted net earnings to assess
the performance of APUC without the effects of gains or losses on foreign exchange, foreign exchange forward contracts, interest rate swaps as these are not reflective of the performance of the underlying business of APUC. APUC believes that
analysis and presentation of net earnings or loss on this basis will enhance an investors understanding of the operating performance of APUCs businesses. It is not intended to be representative of net earnings or loss determined in
accordance with GAAP.

The following table is derived from and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
This supplementary disclosure is intended to more fully explain disclosures related to adjusted net earnings and provides additional information related to the operating performance of APUC. Investors are cautioned that this measure should not be
construed as an alternative to consolidated net earnings in accordance with GAAP.



29



---

The following table shows the reconciliation of net earnings/(loss) to adjusted net earnings exclusive of
these items:



|                                                            |  |                               |        |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------------ | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                            |  | Three months endedDecember 31 |        |   | Twelve months endedDecember 31 |  
|                                                            |  | 2009                          |        |   | 2008                           |   |         | 2009 |  |   | 2008    |  
|Net earnings                                                |  | $                             | (1,366 | ) |                                | $ | (21,095 | )    |  | $ | 31,257  |   |  | $ | (19,038 | )
|Add:                                                        |  |                               |        |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Loss (gain) on derivative financial instruments, net of tax |  |                               | (757   | ) |                                |   | 27,595  |      |  |   | (13,378 | ) |  |   | 33,808  |  
|Write down of property and notes, net of tax                |  |                               | 6,379  |   |                                |   |        |      |  |   | 6,379   |   |  |   |        |  
|Management internalization expense, net of tax              |  |                               | 4,693  |   |                                |   |        |      |  |   | 4,693   |   |  |   |        |  
|Other corporatization expenses, net of tax                  |  |                               | 2,813  |   |                                |   |        |      |  |   | 2,813   |   |  |   |        |  
|Loss (gain) on foreign exchange, net of tax                 |  |                               | (258   | ) |                                |   | 2,339   |      |  |   | (1,261  | ) |  |   | 4,018   |  
|                                                            |  |                               |        |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Adjusted net earnings                                       |  | $                             | 11,504 |   |                                | $ | 8,839   |      |  | $ | 30,503  |   |  | $ | 18,788  |  
|Adjusted net earnings per share/unit *                      |  | $                             | 0.14   |   |                                | $ | 0.12    |      |  | $ | 0.38    |   |  | $ | 0.25    |  
|                                                            |  |                               |        |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  



|* | The Fund converted to a corporation on October 27, 2009. Earnings prior to this date represent earnings per trust unit.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The increase in adjusted net earnings in the three months ended December 31, 2009 is primarily due to future income tax recoveries in the current year
compared to future income tax expenses in the previous year, partially offset by lower earnings from operations. The reasons for future income tax recoveries are discussed in the APUC  Corporate section above.

The increase in adjusted net earnings in the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 is due primarily to by future income tax recoveries in the current
year compared to future income tax expenses in the previous year partially offset by lower earnings from operations. The reasons for future income tax recoveries are discussed in the APUC  Corporate section above.



30



---

SUMMARY OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURES BY BUSINESS SUBSIDIARY



|                                        |  |                               |       |                                |      |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|--------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ----- | ------------------------------ | ---- | - | ----- |  | ---- | ------ |  | - | ------
|                                        |  | Three months endedDecember 31 |       | Twelve months endedDecember 31
|                                        |  | 2009                          |       |                                | 2008 |   | 2009  |  | 2008
|ALGONQUIN POWER CO.                     |  |                               |       |                                |      |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Renewable Energy Division               |  |                               |       |                                |      |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Maintenance expenditures                |  | $                             | 472   |                                |      | $ | 353   |  | $    | 902    |  | $ | 1,280 
|Growth and other expenditures           |  |                               | 8     |                                |      |   | 439   |  |      | 212    |  |   | 8,144 
|                                        |  |                               |       |                                |      |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Total                                   |  | $                             | 480   |                                |      | $ | 792   |  | $    | 1,114  |  | $ | 9,424 
|Thermal Energy Division                 |  |                               |       |                                |      |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Maintenance expenditures                |  | $                             | 664   |                                |      | $ | 1,212 |  | $    | 2,398  |  | $ | 3,457 
|Growth and other expenditures           |  |                               |      |                                |      |   | 1,853 |  |      | 1,123  |  |   | 4,985 
|                                        |  |                               |       |                                |      |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Total                                   |  | $                             | 664   |                                |      | $ | 3,065 |  | $    | 3,521  |  | $ | 8,442 
|                                        |  |                               |       |                                |      |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|LIBERTY WATER CO.                       |  |                               |       |                                |      |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Capital Investment in regulatory assets |  | $                             | (477  | )                              |      | $ | 4,785 |  | $    | 6,174  |  | $ | 35,712
|                                        |  |                               |       |                                |      |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Consolidated (includes Corporate)       |  |                               |       |                                |      |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Maintenance expenditures                |  | $                             | 1,136 |                                |      | $ | 1,713 |  | $    | 3,407  |  | $ | 4,995 
|Capital investment in regulatory assets |  |                               | (477  | )                              |      |   | 4,785 |  |      | 6,174  |  |   | 35,712
|Growth and other expenditures           |  |                               | 8     |                                |      |   | 2,291 |  |      | 1,335  |  |   | 13,128
|                                        |  |                               |       |                                |      |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Total                                   |  | $                             | 667   |                                |      | $ | 8,789 |  | $    | 10,916 |  | $ | 53,835

APUCs consolidated capital
expenditures in 2009 remained lower than in 2008 due to a number of large capital projects that were completed in 2008. The larger capital projects completed in 2008 were APCos BCI project, the Sanger re-powering project, and the acquisition
of the Campbellford hydroelectric facility. Liberty Water in 2008 incurred larger growth related capital projects particularly at the LPSCo facility.

Property, plant and equipment expenditures for the 2010 fiscal year are anticipated to be between $14.0 million and $20.0 million, including approximately $2.0 million related to ongoing requirements in Liberty Water, $6.7 million related
to the APCo Thermal division, and $4.0 million related to the APCo Renewable Energy division.

APUC anticipates that it can generate
sufficient liquidity through internally generated operating cash flows, working capital and bank credit facilities to finance its property, plant and equipment expenditures and other commitments.

2009 Annual Property Plant and Equipment Expenditures

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, APUC incurred growth and other property, plant and equipment expenditures of $1.3 million, as compared to $13.1 million during the comparable period
in 2008. APCo invested $3.4 million in property, plant and equipment during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $5.0 million during the comparable period in 2008. In addition, Liberty Water invested $6.2 million in
property, plant and equipment during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $35.7 million during the comparable period in 2008.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, APCo Renewable Energy divisions expenditures primarily relate to investments in the Great Falls and Franklin hydroelectric facilities. During
the comparable period in 2008, the APCo Renewable Energy divisions expenditures primarily relate to the Campbellford acquisition, a 4MW hydroelectric generating facility located on the Trent-Severn Waterway approximately four kilometres north
of Campbellford, Ontario, and projects at Great Falls and Dickson Dam.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, APCo Thermal
Energy divisions expenditures primarily related to investments at the Dynafibres, EFW and BCI facility. In the comparable period, the expenditures primarily related to the completion of the Sanger re-powering project, investment in the Windsor
Locks facility, the BCI steam sales facility and the EFW facility.



31



---

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, Liberty Waters investment in property, plant
and equipment primarily relate to completion and commissioning of projects initiated in 2008, additional well capacity and engineering work, including approximately $4.1 million of advances from developers and an investment in certain non-utility
assets, a portion of which was sold during the year. During December 2009, Liberty Water refunded an advance from a developer which resulted in a $3.4 million reduction of in the book value of property plant and equipment and a corresponding
reduction in net property plant and equipment expenditures recorded in the period.

As previously noted, these investments, other than
non-utility assets, have been included in the rate case applications currently underway. In the comparable period, the expenditures primarily related to investment in additional wells, engineering work regarding wastewater treatment operations and
arsenic treatment at the LPSCo facility. The expenditures in the comparable period are included in the rate case applications which are currently in process.

2009 Fourth Quarter Property Plant and Equipment Expenditures

During the quarter ended
December 31, 2009, APUC incurred growth and other property, plant and equipment expenditures of nil, as compared to $2.3 million during the comparable period in 2008. APCo incurred net investment in property, plant and equipment $1.1 million
during the quarter ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $1.7 million during the comparable period in 2008. In addition, Liberty Water incurred negative net investment in property, plant and equipment of $0.5 million during the quarter ended
December 31, 2009, as compared to net investment of $4.8 million during the comparable period in 2008.

During the three months ended
December 31, 2009, the Renewable Energy divisions expenditures were not significant. During the comparable period in 2008, the Renewable Energy divisions expenditures primarily related to various projects at Great Falls and Dickson
Dam.

During the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Thermal Energy divisions expenditures were not significant. During the
comparable period in 2008, the Thermal Energy divisions expenditures primarily related to investments in the Sanger, BCI and Windsor Locks facilities.

During the three months ended December 31, 2009, Liberty Water investment in property, plant and equipment primarily related to a number of general projects including approximately $2.5 million of
advances from developers, less the refund of an advance from a developer noted in the discussion of annual expenditures above. In the comparable period, the expenditures primarily related to investment in additional wells, engineering work regarding
wastewater treatment operations and arsenic treatment at the LPSCo facility. As previously noted, these investments have been included in the rate case applications which are currently in process.



32



---

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESERVES

The following table sets out the amounts drawn, letters of credit issued and outstanding amounts available to APUC and its subsidiaries under the senior banking credit facilities previously arranged by
the Fund (the Facilities):



|                                               |  |        |         |   |        |   |          |        |  |   |          |   |  |        |          |   |  |   |          |  
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------ | ------- | - | ------ | - | -------- | ------ |  | - | -------- | - |  | ------ | -------- | - |  | - | -------- | -
|                                               |  | 2009Q4 |         |   | 2009Q3 |   |          | 2009Q2 |  |   | 2009Q1   |   |  | 2008Q4 |         
|Committed and available bank credit facilities |  | $      | 179,500 |   |        | $ | 176,700  |        |  | $ | 189,050  |   |  | $      | 192,750  |   |  | $ | 192,750  |  
|                                               |  |        |         |   |        |   |          |        |  |   |          |   |  |        |          |   |  |   |          |  
|Funds Drawn on credit facilities               |  |        | (94,000 | ) |        |   | (129,000 | )      |  |   | (134,000 | ) |  |        | (129,500 | ) |  |   | (137,000 | )
|Letters of Credit issued                       |  |        | (33,100 | ) |        |   | (33,400  | )      |  |   | (35,250  | ) |  |        | (37,600  | ) |  |   | (37,500  | )
|                                               |  |        |         |   |        |   |          |        |  |   |          |   |  |        |          |   |  |   |          |  
|Remaining available bank facilities            |  | $      | 52,400  |   |        | $ | 14,300   |        |  | $ | 19,800   |   |  | $      | 25,650   |   |  | $ | 18,250   |  
|                                               |  |        |         |   |        |   |          |        |  |   |          |   |  |        |          |   |  |   |          |  
|Cash on Hand                                   |  |        | 2,800   |   |        |   | 7,700    |        |  |   | 6,900    |   |  |        | 900      |   |  |   | 5,900    |  
|                                               |  |        |         |   |        |   |          |        |  |   |          |   |  |        |          |   |  |   |          |  
|Total liquidity and capital reserves           |  | $      | 55,200  |   |        | $ | 22,000   |        |  | $ | 26,700   |   |  | $      | 26,550   |   |  | $ | 24,150   |  
|                                               |  |        |         |   |        |   |          |        |  |   |          |   |  |        |          |   |  |   |          |  

As at and for the period ended December 31, 2009, APUC and the Fund are in compliance with the covenants under its
Facilities.

As at December 31, 2009, $94.0 million had been drawn on the Facilities as compared to $137.0 million as at
December 31, 2008. In addition to amounts actually drawn, there was $33.1 million in letters of credit currently outstanding as at December 31, 2009. As at December 31, 2009, APUC and its subsidiaries had $52.4 million of committed
and available bank facilities remaining and $2.8 million of cash resulting in $55.2 million of total liquidity and capital reserves.

The term
of the Facilities matures on January 14, 2011. Subsequent to December 31, 2009, APUC initiated discussions with its senior lenders with regards to entering into a new multi-year term senior debt facility.

As at December 31, 2009, in addition to the liquidity and capital reserves noted above, APUC also had $40.0 million in short term investments available
to complete the acquisition of three hydroelectric generating assets located in New Brunswick and Maine having a capacity of 36.8 MW, most notably the 34.5MW Tinker Hydroelectric station located on the Aroostook River near the Town of Perth-Andover,
New Brunswick.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Information concerning contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009 is shown below:



|                                       |  |       |         |                     |   |                 |  |                 |         |  |                  |         |   |  |   |        
|-------------------------------------- |  | ----- | ------- | ------------------- | - | --------------- |  | --------------- | ------- |  | ---------------- | ------- | - |  | - | -------
|                                       |  | Total |         | Due less than1 year |   | Due 1 to 3years |  | Due 4 to 5years |         |  | Due after 5years
|Long term debt obligations             |  | $     | 244,772 |                     | $ | 3,360           |  | $               | 166,051 |  | $                | 3,594   |   |  | $ | 71,767 
|Convertible Debentures                 |  | $     | 190,160 |                     |   |                |  |                 |        |  |                  | 66,943  |   |  |   | 123,217
|Interest on long term debt obligations |  | $     | 157,705 |                     |   | 21,685          |  |                 | 38,555  |  |                  | 39,723  |   |  |   | 57,742 
|Purchase obligations                   |  | $     | 33,219  |                     |   | 33,219          |  |                 |        |  |                  |        |   |  |   |       
|Derivative financial instruments:      |  |       |         |                     |   |                 |  |                 |         |  |                  |         |   |  |   |        
|Currency forward                       |  | $     | 1,469   |                     |   |                |  |                 | 1,475   |  |                  | (6      | ) |  |   |       
|Interest rate swap                     |  | $     | 8,226   |                     |   | 5,775           |  |                 | 2,025   |  |                  | 417     |   |  |   | 9      
|Capital lease obligations              |  | $     | 456     |                     |   | 145             |  |                 | 302     |  |                  | 5       |   |  |   | 4      
|Other obligations                      |  | $     | 10,143  |                     |   | 515             |  |                 | 1,025   |  |                  | 1,025   |   |  |   | 7,578  
|                                       |  |       |         |                     |   |                 |  |                 |         |  |                  |         |   |  |   |        
|Total obligations                      |  | $     | 646,150 |                     | $ | 64,699          |  | $               | 209,433 |  | $                | 111,701 |   |  | $ | 260,317
|                                       |  |       |         |                     |   |                 |  |                 |         |  |                  |         |   |  |   |        

Long term obligations include regular payments related to long term
debt and other obligations.



33



---

SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES

On October 27, 2009, pursuant to the Unit Exchange Offer, all the Funds trust units were exchanged for shares of APUC that began to be publicly
traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange while the Funds trust units concurrently ceased trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

As at
December 31, 2009, APUC had 93,064,120 issued and outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis.

APUC may issue an unlimited number of
common shares. The holders of common shares are entitled to: dividends, if and when declared; one vote for each share at meetings of the holders of common shares, and upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of APUC, to receive a pro rata share
of any remaining property and assets of APUC. All shares are of the same class and with equal rights and privileges and are not subject to future calls or assessments.

On December 2, 2009, APUC issued 6,877,000 common shares at $3.35 each for net proceeds of $21.9 million after underwriting expenses and before additional issuance costs (gross proceeds of $23.0
million).

Pursuant to the takeover bid of AirSource Power Fund I LP (Airsource), on September 29, 2006 the Fund issued trust
units and a subsidiary issued limited partnership units which were exchangeable into trust units of the Fund at the holders option (the Exchangeable Units). The Fund issued 1,021,449 trust units during the fourth quarter on
and prior to October 27, 2009, and 1,473,647 trust units during the period ended October 27, 2009 pursuant to the conversion of Exchangeable Units. These trust units were converted to shares of APUC as a result of the Unit Exchange Offer.

At a special meeting of Exchangeable Unitholders of Airsource in December 2009, amendments were approved to amend the agreements related to
the Exchangeable Units to allow the exchange of Exchangeable Units for common shares of APUC, as opposed to units of the Fund, and to change the definition of Redemption Date as set out in the Airsource partnership agreement. As a result
of these changes, APUC exercised the compulsory acquisition provisions contained in the documentation relating to the Exchangeable Units on December 31, 2009 and all of the remaining outstanding Exchangeable Units were exchanged for 532,074
common shares of APUC, as per the formula set out in the original agreements. As a result, there are no outstanding Exchangeable Units as of December 31, 2009.

On August 1, 2008, the Fund issued 3,507,143 trust units in exchange for cash and securities of approximately $27.0 million or $7.69 per unit. The unit issue was pursuant to an agreement entered into
on September 27, 2008 between the Fund, Highground Capital Corporation (Highground) (previously Algonquin Power Venture Fund) and CJIG Management Inc. (CJIG). Under the agreement CJIG acquired all of the issued and
outstanding common shares of Highground, and the Fund issued 3,507,143 trust units, of which 3,065,183 trust units were received by Highground shareholders as part of the agreement with the remaining trust units being retained by CJIG.

During 2009, the Fund received $983 from CJIG as additional proceeds of the share issuance from assets obtained in the transaction and from the
Funds share of the additional proceeds from the further liquidation of the assets held by Highground in excess of $26,970. This has been recorded as an increased amount assigned to the trust units originally issued. The remaining investments,
formerly held by Highground, currently consist of two non-liquid debt assets having a book value of $2.4 million. The payments on these assets are current and the debt matures in 2010 and in 2012. The Funds 50% share of any additional proceeds
from liquidation of the remaining Highground assets will be recorded when received as additional proceeds from the issuance of units in future periods.

In July 2004, the Fund issued 85,000 convertible unsecured debentures at a price of $1,000 for each debenture maturing on July 31, 2011 (Series 1 Debentures). The Series 1 Debentures bore
interest at 6.65% per annum and were convertible into trust units of the Fund at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $10.65 per trust unit, being a ratio of approximately 93.9 trust units for each $1,000 principal. On
October 27, 2009, there were 84,964 convertible debentures outstanding with a face value of $84,964.



34



---

Pursuant to the CD Exchange Offer, on October 27, 2009, $63,755 of the outstanding Series 1 Debentures
were exchanged for convertible debentures bearing interest at 7.5%, maturing on November 30, 2014 (Series 1A Debentures) convertible unsecured subordinated debentures in a principal amount of $66,943. The Series 1A Debentures pay
interest semi-annually in arrears on January 1 and July 1 each year and are convertible into shares of APUC at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $4.08 per share, being a ratio of approximately 245.1 shares for each $1,000
principal. The Series 1A Debentures may not be redeemed by APUC prior to January 1, 2011. During the period of January 2, 2011 until January 1, 2012, the debentures may be redeemed by APUC if the underlying share price is equal to or
exceeds a price of $5.10 (125% of the conversion price of $4.08). During the period of January 2, 2012 until the debentures maturity, APUC can redeem the debentures for 100% of the face value of debenture with cash, or for 105% of the
face value of debenture with additional shares. On December 31, 2009, there were 66,943 Series 1A Debentures outstanding with a face value of $66,943.

The remaining Series 1 Debentures having a face value of $21,209, not converted to Series 1A Debentures pursuant to the CD Exchange Offer, were exchanged for 6,607,027 shares of APUC.

In November 2006, the Fund issued 60,000 convertible unsecured debentures at a price of $1,000 for each debenture maturing on November 30, 2016
(Series 2 Debentures). The Series 2 Debentures bore interest at 6.2% per annum and were convertible into trust units of the Fund at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $11.00 per trust unit, being a ratio of
approximately 90.9 trust units for each $1,000 principal. During the three months ended December 31, 2009 and prior to October 27, 2009, Series 2 Debentures valued at $33,000 were exchanged into 3,000 trust units. These trust units were
converted to shares of APUC as a result of the Unit Exchange. On October 27, 2009, there were 59,967 Series 2 Debentures outstanding with a face value of $59,967.

Pursuant to the CD Exchange Offer, on October 27, 2009, all of the outstanding Series 2 Debentures were exchanged for convertible unsecured subordinated debentures bearing interest at 6.35%, maturing
on November 30, 2016 (Series 2A Debentures) in a principal amount of $59,967. The Series 2A Debentures pay interest semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 each year and are convertible into shares of APUC at the
option of the holder at a conversion price of $6.00 per share, being a ratio of approximately 166.7 shares for each $1,000 principal. The Series 2A Debentures may not be redeemed by APUC prior to January 1, 2011. During the period of
January 2, 2011 until January 1, 2012, the debentures may be redeemed by APUC if the underlying share price is equal to or exceeds a price of $7.50 (125% of the conversion price of $6.00). During the period of January 2, 2012 until
the debentures maturity, APUC can redeem the debentures for 100% of the face value of debenture with cash, or for 105% of the face value of debenture with additional shares. On December 31, 2009, there were 59,967 Series 2A Debentures
outstanding with a face value of $59,967.



35



---

On December 2, 2009, APUC issued 63,250 convertible unsecured debentures at a price of $1,000 for each
debenture maturing on June 30, 2017 (Series 3 Debentures). APUC received net proceeds of $60.7 million after underwriting expenses and before additional issuance costs (gross proceeds of $63.3 million). The Series 3 Debentures bear
interest at 7.0% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 30 and December 30 each year, and are convertible into common shares of APUC at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $4.20 per common share, being a
ratio of approximately 238.1 common shares for each $1,000 principal. The Series 3 Debentures may not be redeemed by APUC prior to December 31, 2012. During the period of January 1, 2013 until December 31, 2014, the Series 3
Debentures may be redeemed by APUC only if the underlying share price is equal to or exceeds a price of $5.25 (125% of the conversion price of $4.20). During the period of January 1, 2015 until the Series 3 Debentures maturity, APUC can
redeem the Series 3 Debentures for 100% of the face value of the Series 3 Debentures with cash, or for 105% of the face value of the Series 3 Debentures with additional shares. On December 31, 2009, there were 63,250 Series 3 Debentures
outstanding with a face value of $63,250.

MANAGEMENT OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE

APUC views its capital structure in terms of its debt levels, both at a project and an overall company level, in conjunction with its equity balances.

APUCs objectives when managing capital are:



| |  |  | To maintain appropriate debt and equity levels in conjunction with standard industry practices and to limit financial constraints on the use of
capital;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To ensure capital is available to finance capital expenditures sufficient to maintain existing assets;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To ensure generation of cash is sufficient to fund sustainable dividends to shareholders as well as meet current tax and internal capital requirements;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To maintain sufficient cash reserves on hand to ensure sustainable dividends made to shareholders; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To have proper credit facilities available for ongoing investment in growth and investment in development opportunities.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

APUC monitors its cash position on a regular basis to ensure funds are available to meet current normal as well as capital and other expenditures. In
addition, APUC continuously reviews its capital structure to ensure its individual business units are using a capital structure which is appropriate for their respective industries.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The following related party transactions occurred during the
year ended December 31, 2009:



| |  |  | APMI provided management services including advice and consultation concerning business planning, support, guidance and policy making and general
management services to APUC. In 2009 and 2008, APMI was paid on a cost recovery basis for all costs incurred and charged $850 (2008 - $893). As discussed above (see  Management Internalization), on December 21, 2009, subject to
regulatory and shareholder approval, APUC ratified the agreement to acquire this management contract from the shareholders of APMI. During 2009 $nil (2008 - $nil) was earned by APMI as an incentive fee.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | APUC has leased its head office facilities since 2001 from an entity owned by the shareholders of APMI on a net basis. Base lease costs for 2009 were
$331 (2008 - $296). APUC believes the lease is on terms equivalent to fair market value for prime office space of similar size and quality at the time the lease was executed.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | APUC and its subsidiaries utilize chartered aircraft, including the use of an aircraft owned by an affiliate of APMI, Airlink. In 2004, the Fund
entered into an agreement and remitted $1.3 million to the affiliate as an advance against expense reimbursements (including engine utilization reserves) for APUC and its subsidiaries business use of the aircraft. Under the terms of this
arrangement, APUC and its subsidiaries will have priority access to make use of the aircraft for a specified number of hours at a cost equal solely to the third party direct operating costs incurred when flying the aircraft. During the year,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



36



---

| | APUC incurred costs in connection with the use of the aircraft of $367 (2008 - $332) and amortization expense related to the advance against expense reimbursements of $153 (2008 -
$90). At December 31, 2009, the remaining amount of the advance was $666 (2008 - $818). APUC believes the amounts paid for chartering the aircraft are equivalent to or better than fair market value terms otherwise available for chartering a
similar aircraft.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | As part of the project to re-power the Sanger facility, APUC entered into an agreement with APMI, whereby APMI undertook certain construction
management services on the project. The project was substantially completed in the fourth quarter of 2007 and APMI was entitled to a development supervision fee plus a performance based contingency fee for its construction management role on the
project. During 2009, APMI was paid $nil (2008 - $23) for development supervision. During 2008, the Fund accrued $674 as the final fee owed to APMI with respect to this project. This fee has been accrued and is included in accounts
payable on the consolidated balance sheet.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In accordance with the construction services agreement related to the St. Leon facility a company controlled by APMI, was paid a final payment of $134
in 2008 for construction services.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Affiliates of APMI hold 60% of the outstanding Class B limited partnership units issued by the St. Leon Wind Energy LP (St. Leon LP), an
indirect subsidiary of APUC and the legal owner of the St. Leon facility. The holders of the Class B Units are entitled to 2.5% of the income allocations and cash distributions from St. Leon LP for a 5 year period commencing June 17, 2008
growing to a maximum of 10% by year 15. In any particular period, cash distributions to the holders of the Class B Units are only to be made after distributions have been made to the other partners, in an aggregate amount, equal to the debt
service on the outstanding debt in respect of such period. The related holders of the Class B units are entitled to cash distributions of $292 for the year ended December 31, 2009 (2008 - $173).
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | APMI is entitled to 50% of the cash flow above 15% return on investment for the BCI project pursuant to its project management contract. During 2009
and 2008, no amounts were paid under this agreement. However, APMI earned a construction supervision fee in 2008 of $100 in relation to the development of this project.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On March 10, 2008, the Fund advanced $225 to the Trustees for purposes of enabling the Trustees to purchase additional trust units of the
Fund. The loans were subject to promissory notes issued in favour of the Fund which were repayable upon demand and were recorded as a reduction in trust units on the consolidated balance sheet. On October 22, 2009 the loans were fully
repaid. During 2008 a principal repayment of $8 was made.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On June 27, 2008, the Fund entered into an agreement with Highground and CJIG to issue trust units in exchange for cash and securities held by
Highground (see  Shareholders Equity and Convertible Debentures). Pursuant to the agreement APMI was entitled to a fee of approximately $240 from the Fund. This fee was paid in 2009.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Up to August 1, 2008, APUC had project debt from Highground in the amount of $3,000 related to the St. Leon facility. Highground advanced $1,600
at a rate of 11.25% as part of the initial financing of the St. Leon facility and advanced $1,400 at a rate of 9.25% during the first quarter of 2007. These amounts have now been eliminated on the consolidated balance sheet due to the acquisition of
securities held by Highground.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Up to July 31, 2008, Highground was paid $150 (2007 - $150) in interest related to debt associated with the St. Leon facility. Some
of the directors and shareholders of APMI were also directors, officers and shareholders of the manager of Highground.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TREASURY RISK MANAGEMENT

APUC attempts to proactively manage the risk exposures of its subsidiaries in a prudent manner. APUC
ensures that each of APCo and Liberty Water maintain insurance on all of their facilities. This includes property and casualty, boiler and machinery, and liability insurance. It has also initiated a number of programs and policies including currency
and interest rate hedging policies to manage its risk exposures.



37



---

There are a number of risk factors relating to the business of APUC and its subsidiaries. Some of these
risks include the U.S. versus Canadian dollar exchange rates, energy market prices, any credit risk associated with a reliance on key customers, interest rate, liquidity and commodity price risk considerations. The risks discussed below are not
intended as a complete list of all exposures that APUC may encounter. A further assessment of APUC and its subsidiaries business risks is also set out in the 2009 Annual Information Form.

Foreign currency risk

Currency fluctuations may affect the cash flows APUC would realize from its consolidated operations, as certain APUC subsidiary businesses sell electricity or provide utility services in the United States
and receive proceeds from such sales in U.S. dollars. Such APUC businesses also incur costs in U.S. dollars. At the current exchange rate, approximately 45% of EBITDA and 60% of cash flow from operations is generated in U.S. dollars. APUC estimates
that, on an unhedged basis, a $0.10 increase in the strength of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar would result in increased reported revenue from U.S. operations of approximately $9.6 million and increased reported expenses from U.S.
operations of approximately $6.4 million or a net impact of $3.2 million ($0.035 per share) on an annual basis.

The Fund
previously managed this risk primarily through the use of forward contracts as it required U.S. dollar cash inflows to meet Canadian dollar cash outflows. As a result of the current business strategy and lower payout ratio, APUC has determined that
the prior practice of hedging 100% of its U.S. currency exposure is no longer appropriate and is taking steps to eliminate its existing forward currency contract program and during the quarter ended December 31, 2009, APUC terminated forward
contracts of $37.2 million for net proceeds of $0.1 million. APUCs policy is not to utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. For the year ended December 31, 2009 APUC realized a $0.3 million loss on
forward contracts settled during the period.

The following chart sets out the amount of foreign exchange forward contracts
outstanding as at December 31, 2009, hedge proceeds and average hedged rates over the term of the contracts:



|                                         |  |       |        |   |      |   |      |  |   |        |   |  |      |        |   |  |   |      
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ---- |  | - | ------ | - |  | ---- | ------ | - |  | - | -----
|                                         |  | Total |        |   | 2010 |   | 2011 |  |   | 2012   |   |  | 2013
|Total U.S. $ Hedged                      |  | $     | 39,760 |   |      | $ |     |  | $ | 26,450 |   |  | $    | 12,560 |   |  | $ | 750  
|Total Can. $ Proceeds                    |  | $     | 40,460 |   |      |   |     |  |   | 26,793 |   |  |      | 12,864 |   |  |   | 803  
|                                         |  |       |        |   |      |   |      |  |   |        |   |  |      |        |   |  |   |      
|Average Hedged Rate                      |  | $     | 1.018  |   |      |   | n/a  |  | $ | 1.013  |   |  | $    | 1.024  |   |  | $ | 1.070
|Unrealized Gain (loss)                   |  | $     | (1,469 | ) |      |   | n/a  |  |   | (1,084 | ) |  |      | (391   | ) |  |   | 6    
|Impact of a $0.10 move in exchange rates |  | $     | 3,976  |   |      |   | n/a  |  | $ | 2,645  |   |  | $    | 1,256  |   |  | $ | 75   

Based on the fair
value of the forward contract using the exchange rates as at December 31, 2009, the exercise of these forward contracts will result in the use of cash of $1.1 million in fiscal 2011 and result in the use of cash of $0.4 million for the
remainder of the hedged period beyond 2011. Assuming a decrease in the strength of the US dollar relative to the Canadian dollar of $0.10 at December 31, 2009, with a corresponding increase in the forward yield curve, the fair value of the
outstanding forward exchange contracts would increase by $4.0 million, resulting in the generation of additional cash of $1.6 million in fiscal 2011, and the generation of $0.9 million in cash for the remainder of the hedged period beyond 2011.



38



---

Market price risk

The majority of APCos electricity generating facilities sell their output pursuant to long term PPAs. However, certain of APCos
hydroelectric facilities in the New England and New York regions sell energy at current spot market rates. In this regard, each $10.00 per MW-hr change in the market prices in the New England and New York regions would result in a change in revenue
of $1.0 million on an annualized basis.

Subsequent to December 31, 2009, as a result of the acquisition of the Energy
Services Business on February 4, 2010, APCo provides the short-term energy requirements to various customers at fixed rates. These customers include energy sales to a town in New Brunswick, Standard Offer Service contract with three local
municipal electric utilities in northern Maine, and a series of direct energy contracts with commercial buyers also in northern Maine. The energy requirements of these customers are estimated at approximately 150,000 MW-hrs on an annualized
basis. While the Tinker Assets are expected to provide the majority of the energy required to service these customers, the Energy Services Business anticipates having to purchase a portion of its energy requirements at the ISO NE spot rates to
supplement self-generated energy. In the event that the Energy Services Business was required to purchase all of its energy requirements at ISO NE spot rates, each $10.00 change per MW-hr in the market prices in ISO NE would result in a change in
expense of $1.5 million on an annualized basis.

This risk is mitigated though the use of short term energy hedges contracts.
APCo has committed to acquire 12,500 MW-hrs of energy over the next 13 months at an average rate of approximately $75 per MW-hr.

Credit/Counterparty risk

APUC and its subsidiaries are subject to credit risk through its trade
receivables. APUC does not believe this risk to be significant as approximately 90% of APCo Renewable Energy divisions revenue, approximately 80% of APCo Thermal Energy divisions revenue, and over 65% of total revenue is earned from
large utility customers having a credit rating of BBB or better, and revenue is generally invoiced and collected within 45 days.



39



---

The following chart sets out APCos significant counterparties, their credit ratings and percentage of
total revenue associated with the counterparty:



|                                          |  |                 |  |                           |        |                             |    |  
|----------------------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------ | --------------------------- | -- | -
|Counterparty                              |  | Credit Rating * |  | ApproximateAnnualRevenues |        | Percent ofDivisionalRevenue |   
|Renewable Energy Division                 |  |                 |  |                           |        |                             |    |  
|Manitoba Hydro                            |  | AA              |  |                           | 19,800 |                             | 29 | %
|Hydro  Quebec                            |  | A+              |  |                           | 21,700 |                             | 32 | %
|Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation |  | A+              |  |                           | 10,800 |                             | 16 | %
|Public Service Company of New Hampshire   |  | BBB             |  |                           | 4,400  |                             | 7  | %
|National Grid                             |  | A-              |  |                           | 3,500  |                             | 5  | %
|Total                                     |  |                 |  | $                         | 60,200 |                             | 88 | %
|Thermal Energy Division                   |  |                 |  |                           |        |                             |    |  
|Connecticut Light and Power Company       |  | BBB             |  |                           | 23,200 |                             | 29 | %
|Pacific Gas and Electric Company          |  | BBB+            |  |                           | 16,300 |                             | 20 | %
|Ahlstrom                                  |  | 1R3**           |  |                           | 11,700 |                             | 15 | %
|Regional Municipality of Peel             |  | AAA             |  |                           | 14,500 |                             | 18 | %
|Total                                     |  |                 |  | $                         | 65,700 |                             | 82 | %



|* | Ratings by Standard & Poors as of January 2010
|- | -----------------------------------------------

|** | Ratings by Dunn & Bradstreet as of February 2010
|-- | ------------------------------------------------

The remaining revenue is primarily earned by Liberty Water. In this regard, the credit risk related to Liberty Water accounts receivable balances of US $2.9 million is spread over approximately 68,000
customers, resulting in an average outstanding balance of less than $50.00 per customer. Liberty Water has processes in place to monitor and evaluate this risk on an ongoing basis including background credit checks and security deposits from new
customers.

Interest rate risk

APUC and its subsidiaries have a number of project specific and other debt facilities that are subject to a variable interest rate. These facilities and the sensitivity to changes in the variable interest
rates charged are discussed below:



| |  |  | The Funds senior debt facility had a balance of $94.0 million as at December 31, 2009. Assuming the current level of borrowings over an
annual basis, a 1% change in the variable rate charged would impact interest expense by $0.9 million annually. The Fund has fixed for floating interest rate swaps in an amount of $100.0 million which fix the interest expense on $100.0 million of
borrowings at approximately 4.125% for 2010. This reduces volatility in the interest expense on this debt. The financial impact of any changes in interest rates are partially offset between the change in interest expense and the change in the
underlying value of the interest rate swap. At December 31, 2009, the mark to market value of the interest rate swap was a net $3.3 million liability (December 31, 2008  net $5.5 million liability).
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | APCos project debt at the St. Leon facility had a balance of $70.5 million as at December 31, 2009. Assuming the current level of borrowings
over an annual basis, a 1% change in the variable rate charged would impact interest expense by $0.7 million annually. Although the underlying debt with the project lenders carries variable rate of interest tied to the Canadian banks prime
rate, APCo has entered into a fixed for floating interest rate swap on this project specific debt until September 2015 which mirrors the underlying debts interest and principal repayment schedule. This minimizes volatility in the interest
expense on this debt. The financial impact of interest rate changes are effectively offset between the change in interest expense and the change in value of the interest rate swap. APCo has effectively fixed its interest expense on its senior debt
facility at 5.47%. At December 31, 2009, the mark to market value of the interest rate swap was a net liability of $5.0 million (December 31, 2008  liability of $11.3 million).
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



40



---

| |  |  | APCos project debt at its Sanger cogeneration facility has a balance of U.S. $19.2 million as at December 31, 2009. Assuming the current
level of borrowings over an annual basis, a 1% change in the variable rate charged would impact interest expense by $0.2 million annually.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that APUC and its
subsidiaries will not be able to meet their financial obligations as they become due. APUCs approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure, to the extent possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when due.

APUC currently pays a dividend of $0.24 per share per year. The Board determines the amount of dividends to be paid,
consistent with APUCs commitment to the stability and sustainability of future dividends, after providing for amounts required to administer and operate APUC and its subsidiaries, for capital expenditures in growth and development
opportunities, to meet current tax requirements and to fund working capital that, in their judgment, ensure APUCs long-term success. Based on the current level dividends paid during the year ended December 31, 2009, cash provided by
operating activities exceeded dividends declared by 2.6 times.

As at December 31, 2009, APUC had cash on hand of $2.8
million and $52.4 million available to be drawn on committed credit facilities from its bank syndicate. The term of the Facilities matures on January 14, 2011. Subsequent to December 31, 2009, APUC initiated discussions with its senior
lenders with regards to entering into a new multi-year term senior debt facility. See the Liquidity and Capital Reserves section for a more detailed discussion and chart of the funds available to APUC and its subsidiaries under its credit
facilities.

The Facilities and project specific debt total approximately $244.8 million with maturities set out in the
Contractual Obligation table above. In the event that APUC was required to replace these Facilities with borrowings having less favourable terms or higher interest rates, the level of cash generated for dividends and reinvestment into the company
may be negatively impacted. APUC attempts to manage the risk associated with floating rate interest loans through the use of interest rate swaps.

The cash flow generated from several of APUCs operating facilities is subordinated to senior project debt. In the event that there was a breach of covenants or obligations with regards to any of
these particular loans which was not remedied, the loan could go into default which could result in the lender realizing on its security and APUC losing its investment in such operating facility. APUC actively manages cash availability at its
operating facilities to ensure they are adequately funded and minimize the risk of this possibility.

Commodity price
risk

APCos exposure to commodity prices is primarily limited to exposure to natural gas price risk. In this
regard, a discussion of this risk is set out as follows:



| |  |  | APCos Sanger facilitys PPA includes provisions which reduce its exposure to natural gas price risk. In this regard, a $1.00 increase in the
price of natural gas per mmbtu, based on expected production levels, would result in an increase in expenses of approximately $1.1 million on an annual basis. However, because the facilitys energy price is linked to the price of natural gas,
this increase would result in a corresponding increase in revenue of $1.2 million or a net increase in operating profits of approximately $0.1 million.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



41



---

| |  |  | APCos Windsor Locks facilitys PPA includes provisions which reduce its exposure to natural gas price risk. In this regard, a $1.00 increase
in the price of natural gas per mmbtu, based on expected production levels, would result in an increase in expenses of approximately $0.8 million on an annual basis.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | APCos BCI facilitys energy services agreement includes provisions which reduce its exposure to natural gas price risk. In this regard, a
$1.00 increase in the price of natural gas per mmbtu, based on expected production levels, would result in an increase in expenses of approximately $0.3 million on an annual basis. However, because the facilitys energy price is linked to the
price of natural gas, this increase would result in a corresponding increase in revenue of $0.4 million or a net increase in operating profits of approximately $0.1 million.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RISK MANAGEMENT

APUC attempts to
proactively manage its risk exposures in a prudent manner and has initiated a number of programs and policies such as employee health and safety programs and environmental safety programs to manage its risk exposures.

There are a number of risk factors relating to the business of APUC and its subsidiaries. Some of these risks include the dependence upon APUC businesses,
regulatory climate and permits, tax related matters, gross capital requirements, labour relations, reliance on key customers and environmental health and safety considerations. The risks discussed below are not intended as a complete list of all
exposures that APUC and its subsidiaries may encounter. A further assessment of APUCs business risks is also set out in the 2008 Annual Information Form.

Mechanical and Operational Risks

APUC is entirely dependant upon
the operations and assets of APUCs businesses. Accordingly, dividends to shareholders are dependent upon the profitability of each of APUCs businesses. This profitability could be impacted by equipment failure, the failure of a major
customer to fulfill its contractual obligations under its PPA, reductions in average energy prices, a strike or lock-out at a facility and expenses related to claims or clean-up to adhere to environmental and safety standards. The water distribution
networks of the Liberty Water operate under pressurized conditions within pressure ranges approved by regulators. Should a water distribution network become compromised or damaged, the resulting release of pressure could result in serious injury or
death to individuals or damage to other property.

These risks are mitigated through the diversification of APUCs
operations, both operationally (APCo and Liberty Water) and geographically (Canada and U.S.), the use of regular maintenance programs, maintaining adequate insurance and the establishment of reserves for expenses. In addition, APCos existing
long term PPAs minimize the risk of reductions in average energy pricing.

Regulatory Risk

Profitability of APUC businesses is in part dependant on regulatory climates in the jurisdictions in which it operates. In the case of some
APCo hydroelectric facilities, water rights are generally owned by governments who reserve the right to control water levels which may affect revenue.

The utility facilities are highly regulated and are subject to rate settings by State regulators. The operating companies are regulated utilities subject to the full regulation of the public utility
commissions for the states in which they operate. The respective public utility commissions have jurisdiction with respect to rate, service, accounting procedures, issuance of securities, acquisitions and other matters. These utilities operate under
cost-of-service regulation as administered by these State



42



---

authorities. The utilities use a historic test year subject to certain adjustments for known and measureable changes in the establishment of rates for the utility and pursuant to this method the
determination of the rate of return on approved rate base and deemed capital structure, together with the reasonable and prudent costs, establishes the revenue requirement upon which each utilitys customer rates are determined. These
regulatory bodies have the authority to establish the allowed rate of return on approved rate base and also determine which investments are approved for inclusion in the rate base which in both cases can affect the profitability of the division. If
the utilities are unable to obtain government approval of requested rate increases, or if rate increases are untimely or inadequate to cover capital investments and to recover expenses, profitability could be affected.

Federal, State and local environmental laws and regulations impose substantial compliance requirements on water and wastewater utility
operations. Operating costs could be significantly affected in order to comply with new or stricter regulatory requirements.

Water and wastewater utilities could be subject to condemnation or other methods of taking by government entities under certain conditions. While any taking by government entities would require compensation be paid to Liberty Water, and
while Liberty Water believes it would receive fair market value for any assets that are taken, there is no assurance that the value received for assets taken will be in excess of book value.

Liberty Water regularly works with these authorities to manage the affairs of the business.

Asset Retirement Obligations

APUC and its subsidiaries complete periodic reviews of potential asset retirement obligations that may require recognition. As part of this process, APUC and its subsidiaries consider the contractual
requirements outlined in their operating permits, leases and other agreements, the probability of the agreements being extended, the likelihood of being required to incur such costs in the event there is an option to require decommissioning in the
agreements, the ability to quantify such expense, the timing of incurring the potential expenses as well as business and other factors which may be considered in evaluating if such obligations exist and in estimating the fair value of such
obligations. Based on its assessments, APUCs businesses do not have any significant retirement obligation liabilities and has not recorded any liability in its financial statements.

Generally, APCos hydroelectric facilities are subject to some form of a water use agreement. The terms of these agreements vary by
facility as they are agreements made with the local government body that regulates electrical energy generators and can extend over many years. Certain of the agreements contain clauses which allow the regulating body the option to require APCo to
decommission the facility upon the expiry or termination of the agreements. Other facilities have no specific obligations other than to maintain the facility in good working order. APCo has options in many of its existing water use agreements to
renew or extend the agreements and anticipates being in a position to extend the majority of its agreements and continue to operate its facilities. Based on historical general practice within the regions in which APCo has facilities, APCo has
assessed the probability of being required to decommission a facility upon the expiry of a water use agreement to be remote. As such, any potential asset retirement obligation expense has been assessed as insignificant as the obligation would be
incurred well into the future and there is a remote likelihood of being required to decommission a facility.

The Renewable
Energy divisions St. Leon facility does not own the property on which its turbines are located. In 2004, St. Leon entered into long term right of way agreements with land owners which allowed it to construct and maintain the wind turbines used
by the facility on their property. These agreements are for minimum terms of 40 years and, upon expiry or termination, provide the land owners with title to the equipment if it is not decommissioned by APCo at its option. While APCo anticipates
being in a position to renew or extend the existing PPA in 2025, in the event that APCo is unable to



43



---

renew or extend the agreement, or identify another purchaser of the energy, APCo may choose to decommission the facility. APCo has assessed there to be a remote likelihood of incurring any cost
to decommission the wind farm.

The APCo Thermal Energy divisions EFW facility owns the property on which its facility
operates. EFWs current waste incineration agreement expires in 2012 with two five year options to extend. While APCo anticipates being in a position to renew or extend the existing contract in 2012, in the event that APCo is unable to renew or
extend the agreement, APCo may choose to close the facility but has no legal obligation to remove the assets. Under the terms of the contract, the responsibility for removal of the bulk of any hazardous material generated in the operation of the
facility remains with EFWs primary customer. As such, the potential expense to bring the facility in line with current environmental standards in the event it is eventually closed has been assessed as insignificant based on the quantification
of costs to remediate the facility, expectation that the existing contract can be extended or renewed and that the potential timing of such an event, although unlikely, would be well in the future.

Liberty Waters facilities operate under agreements with a state or municipal regulator to provide the sole water distribution and/or
wastewater treatment services in its area of operations, as set out in the agreements. In general, these facilities are operated with the assumption that their services will be required in perpetuity and there are no contractual decommissioning
requirements. In order to remain in compliance with the applicable regulatory bodies, Liberty Water has regular maintenance programs at each facility to ensure its equipment is properly maintained and replaced on a cyclical basis. These maintenance
expenses, expenses associated with replacing aging wastewater treatment facilities and expenses associated with providing new sources of water can generally be included in the facilitys rate base and thus Liberty Water is allowed to earn a
return on its investment.

Environmental Risks

APUC and its subsidiaries face a number of environmental risks that are normal aspects of operating within the renewable power generation,
thermal power generation and utilities business segments which have the potential to become environmental liabilities. Many of these risks are mitigated through the maintenance of adequate insurance which include property, boiler and machinery,
environmental and excess liability policies. APCo has assessed the likelihood of these risks becoming a contingent environmental liability as remote; therefore APCo has not recorded any contingent liabilities on its financial statements.

To manage these risks responsibly, APUC has ensured the Environmental and Compliance departments have been established within the
different subsidiaries which are responsible for monitoring all of each subsidiarys operations, ensuring all operating facilities are in compliance with environmental regulations and preparing regulatory submissions as required. In the
aggregate, the departments comprise 7 full time equivalent positions based out of head office and have an annual budget of approximately $1.0 million, which includes wages, travel and other costs. Facility specific permitting and compliance expenses
are direct operating expenses of each facility and are excluded from these expenses.

APUC and its subsidiaries have procedures
to prevent and minimize any impact of possible oil spills and soil contamination that meet generally accepted industry practices. APCos field personnel perform inspections of oil and chemical storage areas on a minimum of a quarterly basis.
Each of APUCs businesses have 24 hour, 365 day emergency response and spill procedures in place in the event there is an oil or chemical spill.

The APCo Renewable Energy division faces a number of environmental risks that are normal aspects of operating within its business segment. The primary environmental risks associated with the operation of
a hydroelectric facility include possible dam failure which results in upstream or downstream flooding; equipment failure which result in oil or other lubricants being spilled into the waterway. In addition, the



44



---

operation of a hydroelectric facility may cause the water in the associated waterway to flow faster, or slower, which could result in water flow issues which impact fish population, water quality
and potential increases in soil erosion around a dam facility. In order to monitor and mitigate these risks, APCo completes facility inspections at minimum on an annual basis and ensures its facilities are in compliance with the appropriate
regulatory requirements for the specific facility. Federal regulators in the U.S. inspect certain hydroelectric facilities on an annual basis and complete an environmental inspection every 3-5 years.

The primary environmental risks associated with the operation of a wind farm include potential harm to the local and migratory bird
population, harm to the local bat population as well as concerns over noise levels and visual harm to the scenic environment around the wind farm. As part of the Federal and Provincial approval of the St. Leon wind project, certain
pre-construction and post construction monitoring studies were required. No significant issues were identified as a result of these studies. In order to monitor and mitigate these risks, APCo completes facility inspections at minimum on an annual
basis and ensures its facilities are in compliance with the appropriate regulatory requirements for the specific facility.

The
APCo Thermal Energy division faces a number of environmental risks that are normal aspects of operating within its business segment. The primary environmental risks associated with the operation of a cogeneration facility include potential air
quality and emissions issues, soil contamination resulting from oil spills and issues around the storage and handling of chemicals used in normal operations. In order to monitor and mitigate these risks, and to remain within the regulatory
requirements appropriate for the specific facility, APCo maintains continuous emissions monitoring systems, performs regular stack testing and tests the calibration of monitoring. The primary environmental risks associated with the operation of an
incineration facility include potential air quality, odour and emissions issues, soil contamination resulting from oil or other chemical spills and issues around the storage and handling of municipal solid waste. In order to monitor and mitigate
these risks, and to remain within the regulatory requirements appropriate for the specific facility, APCo maintains continuous emissions monitoring systems, performs annual stack testing and completes an annual technical evaluation of ash
composition.

Liberty Water faces a number of environmental risks that are normal aspects of operating within its business
segment. The primary environmental risks associated with the operation of a wastewater treatment facility include potential air quality and odour management issues, wastewater spills and surface and ground water contamination. In order to
monitor and mitigate these risks, and to remain within the regulatory requirements appropriate for the specific facility, Liberty Water maintains ongoing sampling and testing programs as required in its operational jurisdiction, including annual
field investigations by management. It also has a preventative maintenance program to reduce the risk of leaks and other mechanical failures within the wastewater collection system and at the wastewater treatment plants that it
operates.

The primary environmental risks associated with the operation of a water distribution facility include risk of
groundwater contamination by contaminants such as bacterial, synthetic, organic and inorganic pollutants, consumption and availability of groundwater and ensuring water quality continues to meet and exceed Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and state standards. In order to monitor and mitigate these risks, and to remain within the regulatory requirements appropriate for the specific facility, Liberty Water maintains a regular sampling and testing program as
required in its operational jurisdiction. It also has a preventative maintenance program to reduce the risk of leaks and other mechanical failures within the water distribution systems that it operates.

Federal drinking water legislation in the United States requires all drinking water systems to meet specific standards. The costs of
complying with drinking water standards form part of a facilitys rate case applications.



45



---

Water distribution facilities depend on an adequate supply of water to meet present and
future demands of customers. Drought conditions could interfere with sources of water supply used by the utilities and affect their ability to supply water in sufficient quantities to existing and future customers. An interruption in the water
supply could have an adverse effect on the results of operations of the utilities. Government restrictions on water usage during drought conditions could also result in decreased demand for water, even if supplies are adequate, which could adversely
affect revenues and earnings.

Specific Environmental Risks

Greenhouse Gas Initiatives:

Several Northeastern US States have formed a coordination group to develop a multi state green house gas mitigation action plan. This group, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), has
received backing from several states where APCo operates facilities including Connecticut and New Jersey. RGGI drafted a model cap and trade legislation that has been endorsed by all of the states involved in the initiative. The cap and trade
program will be implemented to regulate CO2 emissions from large electrical generation facilities, including the Windsor Locks facility. The RGGI regulation to implement a greenhouse gas cap and trade program was passed in Connecticut in late August
2008.

The Windsor Locks facility is the only APCo site that is currently affected by the RGGI regulations. As such APCo will
be required to purchase approximately 250,000 tons of CO2 allowances per year, equivalent to the total annual CO2 emissions from the Windsor Locks facility for the 2009 to 2012 fiscal years. APCo is entitled to apply for allowances and/or purchase
allowances at a base price of $2.00 per tonne from the state of Connecticut. APCo submitted an application on October 31, 2008 for allowances under the available programs. For 2010, APCo has currently estimated the cost of compliance with the
RGGI requirements for the Windsor Locks facility to be between $0.2 and $0.4 million.

Seven U.S. States (including Arizona and
California) and four Canadian provinces (including Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec) have formed a group called the Western Climate Initiative (WCI). This group recently released details of its Regional Cap-and-Trade Program, which is
scheduled to start on January 1, 2012. Each member state/province is now responsible for developing the draft design of the Regional Cap-and-Trade Program and taking the necessary steps to implement the Program within its jurisdiction. APCo
owns and operates the Sanger facility in California and the EFW facility in Ontario and holds investments in two others in Ontario which could be impacted by this program. As this process has just begun, it is too early to determine the potential
financial impact on APCo and means available to mitigate this financial impact, if any.

The Carbon Disclosure Project
(CDP) is an independent non-profit organization that represents institutional investors managing over $57.0 trillion of assets. The CDP is specifically working to encourage companies world wide to quantify and disclose their greenhouse
gas emissions and to outline what actions the companies are taking to address climate change risk, both from potential physical impacts but also from regulatory changes that may result in an effort to address climate change.

APCo submitted a baseline greenhouse gas emissions inventory to the CDP at the end of June 2008. The emissions data includes both direct
emissions from our processes as well as indirect emissions from purchased power. The emissions inventory has been developed based on guidance from the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. This submission will allow comparisons with other firms to be made, and
will also be useful as a baseline for addressing climate change regulations.



46



---

Renewable Energy Division:

As a result of certain legislation passed in Quebec (Bill C93), APCo is undertaking technical assessments of its hydroelectric facility dams
owned or leased within the Province of Quebec. This is discussed in greater detail within the analysis of results in the Renewable Energy Division.

The province of Ontario is considering enacting new legislation similar to Bill C93. APCo operates four hydroelectric facilities in Ontario. While it is too early to assess the costs of compliance, it is
possible that modifications to certain dam structures may be required in order to be compliant with any new regulations should they come into effect. Any capital costs associated with the anticipated modifications are expected to be significantly
lower than the expected capital costs related to the Quebec facilities, as there are fewer facilities in Ontario and they are of newer construction.

Liberty Water:

Liberty Water owns and operates the LPSCo facility, a water
distribution and waste-water treatment utility servicing the City of Litchfield Park,and parts of the City of Goodyear, the City of Avondale and the County of Maricopa, Arizona, where groundwater pollutants, namely trichloroethylene
(TCE) originally employed by a former aerospace manufacturing plant in the nearby City of Goodyear are progressing toward three of the twelve wells that provide water to the LPSCo service area. The EPA began monitoring TCE in 1981 and
has been tracking the gradual underground movement since. In addition to actively participating in EPA regular technical meetings in regards to this monitoring program, LPSCo closely monitors its wells for this groundwater pollutant through the
sampling and testing of water from wells that are potentially at risk of contamination. To date there have not been any detectable levels of TCE in the water from wells used by LPSCo. EPAs monitoring and control efforts have not indicated
that the concentrations are being reduced or fully captured. Additional remedial efforts by the EPA to stop advancement and reduce TCE concentrations are underway. In the event that any wells exceed EPA permitted TCE level, LPSCo would
undertake the appropriate actions which may include installing appropriate treatment facilities or removing the well from the water distribution system of the utility. In the event of removal of a well, there would remain sufficient production
and reservoir capacity within the balance of the water distribution system to adequately service the needs of all of LPCSos customers. In addition, LPSCo has identified alternate sites where replacement wells can be established to replace
this lost capacity. The cost of establishing a new well is estimated to be between $2.0 million and $3.5 million depending on the location, depth and other factors. The cost of commissioning a well forms part of the rate base for the
utility. Other factors that can impact the cost of a well include, but are not limited to, any requirement to construct wellhead treatment for pollutants, volume of water available at the new site, and acquisition of land and groundwater
rights. Liberty Water does not believe it is exposed to a material liability and has not recorded a contingent environmental liability on its financial statements.

APUCs policy is to record estimates of environmental liabilities when they are known or considered probable and the related liability is estimable. There are no known material environmental
liabilities as at December 31, 2009.

Seasonal fluctuations and hydrology

The hydroelectric operations of APCo are impacted by seasonal fluctuations. These assets are primarily run-of-river and as such
fluctuate with the natural water flows. During the winter and summer periods, flows are generally lower while during the spring and fall periods flows are generally higher. The ability of these assets to generate income may be impacted by changes in
water availability or other material hydrologic events within a watercourse. It is, however, anticipated that due to the geographic diversity of the facilities, variability of total revenues will be minimized. For Liberty Waters water
utilities, demand for water is affected by weather conditions and temperature. Demand for water during warmer months is generally greater than cooler months due to requirements for irrigation, swimming pools, cooling systems and other outside water
use. If there is above normal rainfall or rainfall is more frequent than normal the demand for water may decrease adversely affecting revenues.



47



---

Wind resource

The strength and consistency of the wind resource will vary from the estimate set out in the initial wind studies that were relied upon to
determine the feasibility of the facility. If weather patterns change or the historical data proves not to accurately reflect the strength and consistency of the actual wind, the assumptions underlying the financial projections as to the amount of
electricity to be generated by the facility may be different and cash could be impacted.

Litigation risks and other
contingencies

APUC and certain of its subsidiaries are involved in various litigations, claims and other legal
proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Any accruals for contingencies related to these items are recorded in the financial statements at the time it is concluded that a material financial loss is likely and the
related liability is estimable. Anticipated recoveries under existing insurance policies are recorded when reasonably assured of recovery.

As reported in previous public filings of the Fund, Trafalgar Power, Inc. and Christine Falls Power Corporation (collectively, Trafalgar) commenced an action in 1999 in U.S.
District Court against the Fund, APMI and various other entities related to them in connection with, among other things, the sale of the Trafalgar Class B Note by Aetna Life Insurance Company to the Fund and in connection with the foreclosure
on the security for the Note which includes interests in Trafalgar entities that own hydroelectric generating facilities in New York. In 2006, the District Court decided that Aetna had complied with the provisions concerning the sale of
the B Note, that the Fund was therefore the holder and owner of the B Note, and that all other claims by Trafalgar with respect to the transfer of the Note were without merit. In 2008 Algonquin filed for summary judgement seeking
dismissal of Trafalgars remaining claims, and the District Court granted this motion on November 6, 2008. On October 22, 2009 Trafalgar filed an appeal from the November 6, 2008 summary judgement to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit. Financial loss to the Fund is not expected to result from the appeal.

Although APMI paid one
half of the external legal fees incurred up to July 1, 2002 with respect to the Trafalgar dispute, APUC is funding the litigation. In the event of a recovery by APUC of all or part of the funds, APUC and APMI will divide such amounts in
proportion to the amount of legal fees funded, after reimbursement of expenses.

On December 19, 1996, the Attorney
General of Québec (Québec AG) filed suit in Québec Superior Court against Algonquin Développement Côte Ste-Catherine Inc. (Développement Hydromega), a predecessor company to an APUC
subsidiary. The Québec AG at trial claimed $5.4 million for amounts that the APUC entities have been paying to the federal authority under its water lease with the authority. The APUC entities brought the Attorney General of
Canada into the proceedings. On March 27, 2009, the Superior Court dismissed the claim of the Québec AG. Québec AG appealed this decision on April 24, 2009. The Côte Ste-Catherine Facility currently pays
water lease dues to the federal government, but if the Québec AG is successful in any appeal, an adjustment and/or increase of such amounts is possible.

Obligations to serve

Liberty Waters utility facilities may be
located within areas of the United States experiencing growth. These utilities may have an obligation to service new residential, commercial and industrial customers. While expansion to serve new customers will likely result in increased future cash
flows, it may require



48



---

significant capital commitments in the immediate term. Accordingly, Liberty Water may be required to solicit additional capital or obtain additional borrowings to finance these future
construction obligations.

Tax risks associated with the Unit Exchange Offer

There is a possibility that the Canada Revenue Agency could successfully challenge the tax consequences of the Unit Exchange or prior
transactions of Hydrogenics or that legislation could be enacted or amended resulting in different tax consequences from those contemplated in the Unit Exchange Offer for APUC. While APUC is confident in its position, such a challenge or legislation
could potentially and materially affect the availability or amount of the tax attributes or other tax accounts of APUC.

Critical
Accounting Estimates

APUC prepared its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP. An understanding of APUCs
accounting policies is necessary for a complete analysis of results, financial position, liquidity and trends. Refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on accounting principles. The Consolidated Financial
Statements are presented in Canadian dollars rounded to the nearest thousand, except per unit amounts and except where otherwise noted.

Financial statements prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP require management to make estimates and assumptions relating to reported amounts of revenue and expenses, reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. APUC regularly evaluates the assumptions and estimates that are used in the preparation of APUCs Consolidated Financial Statements. Estimates and assumptions used by management are based on past experience
and other factors deemed reasonable in the circumstances. Since these estimates and assumptions involve varying degrees of judgment and uncertainty, the amounts reported in the financial statements could in the future prove to be inaccurate.

APCo recognizes revenue derived from energy sales at the time energy is delivered. Revenue from waste disposal is recognized on an actual
tonnage of waste delivered to the plant at prices specified in the contract. Certain contracts include price reductions if specified thresholds are exceeded. Revenue for these contracts are recognized based on actual tonnage at the expected price
for the contract year and any amount billed in excess of the expected is deferred. Liberty Water revenue is recognized when processed and delivered to customers.

APUC records as other liabilities amounts received by Liberty Water which relate to advances from developers for water distribution and water reclamation main extensions received. These advances usually
carry repayment terms based on the revenue generated by the development in question ranging over a specified period of time. At the end of the payment term, the unpaid portion of the advance converts to contribution in aid of construction and is not
required to be repaid to the developer. The amount recorded as other liabilities is based on Liberty Waters expected repayments as determined by historical experience and industry practice.

Estimates are also made related to the useful life of long-lived assets. These estimates are used to determine amortization expense. Estimates of an
assets useful life are based on past experience with similar assets taking into account technological or other changes. If these estimates prove to be inaccurate, management may have to shorten the anticipated useful life of the assets
recorded in the financial statements resulting in higher amortization expense in future periods or possibly an impairment charge to reflect the write-down in the value of the asset.

APUC and its subsidiaries also regularly assess whether there has been an impairment to long term investments, notes receivable, capital and intangible assets, and recoverability of future tax assets
based on circumstances that may indicate APUC will not be able to recover the assets entire carrying value. Should impairment be deemed to have occurred, APUC would reduce the carrying value of that asset in the financial statements and deduct this
amount from earnings. APUC cannot predict future events that could create impairment, or how future events might affect the carrying value of the assets values reported in the financial statements.

Controls and Procedures

APUCs
management is responsible for preparation and presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and MD&A. APUCs Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. This MD&A has been prepared in accordance
with the requirements of the Ontario Securities Commission including National Instrument 51-102 of the Canadian Securities Administrators.

Disclosure Control and Procedures

In accordance with the
requirements of the Securities Act (Ontario)and other provincial securities legislation, the CEO and CFO of the Company certify interim quarterly and annual filings that they have designed APUCs disclosure controls and
have evaluated their effectiveness for the applicable period. Disclosure controls are those controls and procedures which ensure that information that is required to be disclosed by Multilateral Instrument 52-109, the Ontario Securities Commission
and other provincial regulators is recorded, processed and reported within the time frames specified by regulators. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by APUC is appropriately
accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and the CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of APUCs disclosure controls and procedures was carried out, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including the CEO and the CFO, as appropriate, and was presented to the Disclosure Committee and to the Audit Committee. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of such
period.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The CEO and CFO of APUC are responsible for designing internal controls over financial reporting or causing them to be designed under their
supervision in order to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

Under the supervision and with the participation of the CEO and the CFO, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2009, based on the framework set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on its evaluation
under this framework, management concluded that the internal control over financial reporting was effective as of that date.

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human
diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations,
there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is
possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

Changes in Internal Control
over Financial Reporting

There were no changes made in the year ended December 31, 2009 to the internal control over
financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting.



49



---

Quarterly Financial Information

The following is a summary of unaudited quarterly financial information for the two years ended December 31, 2009.



|                                               |  |                 |       |   |                 |   |                 |  |   |                 |   |  |   |         |  
|---------------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | ----- | - | --------------- | - | --------------- |  | - | --------------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|Millions of dollars (except per share amounts) |  | 1st Quarter2009 |       |   | 2nd Quarter2009 |   | 3rd Quarter2009 |  |   | 4th Quarter2009 |  
|Revenue                                        |  | $               | 52.2  |   |                 | $ | 46.5            |  | $ | 45.1            |   |  | $ | 43.4    |  
|Net earnings /(loss)                           |  |                 | 4.2   |   |                 |   | 15.3            |  |   | 13.1            |   |  |   | (1.4    | )
|Net earnings / (loss) per share/trust unit     |  |                 | 0.05  |   |                 |   | 0.20            |  |   | 0.17            |   |  |   | (0.03   | )
|Total Assets                                   |  |                 | 974.2 |   |                 |   | 952.4           |  |   | 925.7           |   |  |   | 1,013.4 |  
|Long term debt*                                |  |                 | 457.6 |   |                 |   | 456.2           |  |   | 445.4           |   |  |   | 439.9   |  
|Dividend/distribution per share/trust unit     |  |                 | 0.06  |   |                 |   | 0.06            |  |   | 0.06            |   |  |   | 0.06    |  
|                                               |  |                 |       |  
|                                               |  | 1st
Quarter2008 |       |   | 2nd
Quarter2008 |   | 3rd
Quarter2008 |  |   | 4th
Quarter2008 |  
|Revenue                                        |  | $               | 48.0  |   |                 | $ | 54.2            |  | $ | 55.1            |   |  | $ | 56.5    |  
|Net earnings / (loss)                          |  |                 | (1.6  | ) |                 |   | 8.0             |  |   | (4.4            | ) |  |   | (21.1   | )
|Net earnings / (loss) per trust unit           |  |                 | (0.02 | ) |                 |   | 0.10            |  |   | (0.06           | ) |  |   | (0.27   | )
|Total Assets                                   |  |                 | 948.5 |   |                 |   | 950.0           |  |   | 962.7           |   |  |   | 978.5   |  
|Long term debt*                                |  |                 | 460.6 |   |                 |   | 469.6           |  |   | 460.9           |   |  |   | 462.9   |  
|Distribution per trust unit                    |  |                 | 0.23  |   |                 |   | 0.23            |  |   | 0.23            |   |  |   | 0.06    |  



|* | Long term debt includes long term liabilities, convertible debentures and other long term obligations
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The quarterly results are impacted by various factors including seasonal fluctuations and acquisitions of facilities as noted in this MD&A.

Quarterly revenues have fluctuated between $43.4 million and $56.5 million over the prior two year period. A number of factors impact quarterly results
including seasonal fluctuations, hydrology and winter and summer rates built into the PPAs. In addition, a factor impacting revenues year over year is the significant fluctuation in the strength of the Canadian dollar which has resulted in
significant changes in reported revenue from U.S. operations.

Quarterly net earnings have fluctuated between net earnings of $15.3 million
and a net loss of $21.1 million over the prior two year period. Earnings have been significantly impacted by non-cash factors such as future tax expense due to the enactment of Bill C-52 and gains and losses on financial instruments due to
APUCs adoption of Section 3855 and the discontinuation of hedge accounting under Section 3865.

Changes in Accounting
Policies

APUCs accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended
December 31, 2009. There have been no changes to the critical accounting policies as disclosed in APUCs audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended December 31, 2008 except as disclosed below.

Goodwill and intangible assets

Effective January 1, 2009, APUC has adopted the CICA Handbook Section 3064, Goodwill and intangible assets. Section 3064 states that upon their initial identification, intangible assets are
to be recognized as assets only if they meet the definition of an intangible asset and the recognition criteria. This section also provides further information on the recognition of internally generated intangible assets. As for subsequent
measurement of intangible assets, goodwill, and disclosure, Section 3064 carries forward the requirements of the old Section 3062, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.



50



---

Accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation

Effective October 1, 2009, APUC retrospectively adopted rate regulated accounting for its Liberty Water utilities following the
principle of U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 980 Regulated Operations (ASC 980). Under ASC 980, regulatory assets and liabilities that would not be recorded under Canadian GAAP for non-regulated entities are recorded.
Regulatory assets and liabilities represent probable future revenues or expenses associated with certain charges or credits that will be recovered from or refunded to customers through the rate making process. Items to which regulatory accounting
requirements apply include deferred rate case costs, and equity return component on regulated capital projects.

Deferred rate
case costs relate to costs incurred by Liberty Waters utilities to file, prosecute and defend rate case applications and which the utility expects to receive prospective recovery through its rates approved by the regulators. Under ASC 980
these costs are capitalized and amortized over the period of rate recovery granted by the regulator while they are expensed under Canadian GAAP for non-regulated entities.

Under ASC 980, allowance for funds used during construction projects included in rate base is capitalized. This allowance is designed to enable a utility to capitalize financing costs during periods of
construction of property subject to rate regulation. It represents the cost of borrowed funds (allowance for borrowed funds used during construction) and a return on other funds (allowance for equity funds used during construction). Prior to the
adoption of ASC 980, APUC capitalized interest costs directly attributable to the construction of these assets but did not capitalize the allowance for equity funds used during constructions.

The effect of adopting rate regulated accounting on previously reported amounts is as follows:



|                             |  |                               |   |  |            |   |  |                    |  
|---------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | - |  | ---------- | - |  | ------------------ | -
|                             |  | Year-ended December 31, 2008  |  
|                             |  | Balance aspreviously reported |   |  | Adjustment |   |  | Balance asrestated |  
|Other assets                 |  | 971                           |   |  | 1,053      |   |  | 2,024              |  
|Property plant and equipment |  | 804,965                       |   |  | 385        |   |  | 805,350            |  
|Future tax asset             |  | 3,304                         |   |  | (410       | ) |  | 2,894              |  
|Future income tax liability  |  | 85,654                        |   |  | 150        |   |  | 85,804             |  
|Deficit                      |  | (359,547                      | ) |  | 878        |   |  | (358,669           | )

Credit
Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

Effective January 1, 2009, APUC adopted EIC
173, Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which clarifies that the credit risk of counterparties should be taken into account in determining the fair value of derivative instruments. EIC 173 has been applied
retrospectively without restatement of prior periods to all financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value. The impact of adopting EIC 173 was a decline of $2,542 to the recorded amount of the financial derivative liability and an increase
of $494 in future income tax liability at December 31, 2008 and a $2,048 decrease in deficit.

Business
Combinations

In January 2009, the CICA issued Handbook Section 1582, Business combinations, which replaces the
existing standards. This section establishes the standards for the accounting of business combinations, and states that all assets and liabilities of an acquired business will be recorded at fair value. Estimated obligations for contingent
considerations and contingencies will also be recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The standard also states that acquisition-related costs will be expensed as incurred and



51



---

that restructuring charges will be expensed in the periods after the acquisition date. This standard is equivalent to the International Financial Reporting Standards on business combinations.
This standard is applied prospectively to business combinations with acquisition dates on or after January 1, 2011. Earlier adoption is permitted. APUC is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial
statements.

Non Controlling Interests

In January 2009, the CICA issued Handbook Section 1602, Non-controlling interests, which establishes standards for the accounting of
non-controlling interests of a subsidiary in the preparation of consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. This standard is equivalent to the International Financial Reporting Standards on consolidated and separate
financial statements. This standard is effective for 2011. Earlier adoption is permitted. APUC is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Financial Statements

In January 2009, the CICA issued Handbook Section 1601, consolidated financial statements, which replaces the existing standards. This section establishes the standards for preparing consolidated
financial statements and is effective for 2011. Earlier adoption is permitted. APUC is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

Changeover to International Financial Reporting Standards

In
2011, APUC is required to change the accounting framework under which financial statements are prepared in Canada to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). For the quarter ended March 31, 2011, APUC will report
quarterly comparative financial information using IFRS. While the exact impact on APUCs financial statements of moving to IFRS is not completely known at this time; APUC conducted a high level diagnostic and qualitative assessment of its
operations in order to identify the main areas where IFRS conversion will have the largest impact. Based on the analysis to date, areas of potential change may involve the valuation of property, plant and equipment, business combinations,
translation of financial statements of foreign operations, income taxes, financial statement disclosure and initial adoption of IFRS under the provisions of IFRS 1, First-Time Adoption of IFRS. Experience in other jurisdictions has shown that
earnings may tend to become more volatile and there will be an increase in the volume and complexity of financial disclosures.

APUC has developed a conversion plan in order to be prepared for the conversion and to minimize any disruption the conversion may cause. APUCs conversion plan, detailed below, addresses matters including detailed assessment of the
effect of IFRS on its financial statements preparation, information systems requirements, internal control over financial reporting (ICOFR) as well as disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P), in addition to training and
other related business matters. This conversion plan is subject to change as a result of ongoing and subsequent changes to IFRS standards and interpretations. APUCs Audit Committee is involved with this process and will be provided formal
updates on a quarterly basis and as required.

Financial Statement preparation

APUC has begun to prepare IFRS format Financial Statements to highlight note disclosure differences between IFRS and Canadian GAAP. Following
the company wide high-level analysis, detailed analyses are being performed for each of the main areas of differences. At that point, detailed accounting differences will be identified and quantified, the impact on information systems and the need
for training will be assessed and the resulting changes to ICOFR and DC&P will be evaluated, designed and implemented area by area. The company-wide impact will then be summarized and finalized. The adjustments that arise on retrospective
conversion from Canadian GAAP to IFRS will be recognized directly in opening retained earnings. Four key areas of differences are described below.



52



---

Property, Plant & Equipment (PP&E)

The plan focuses initially on its greatest area of required effort being PP&E. IFRS and Canadian GAAP contain the same basic principles
for PP&E; however, there are some differences. Specifically, there may be changes in accounting for PP&E relating to:



| |  |  | Component accounting, including periodic overhaul costs (power generation); and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Rate-regulated entities.
| | - |  | ------------------------

IFRS requires PP&E to be measured at cost in accordance with IFRS, breaking down material items into components and amortizing each one separately. This method of componentizing PP&E may result in
an increase number of component parts for the power generation facilities that are separately recorded and depreciated and, as a result, may impact the calculation of depreciation expense. Libery Water already follows component accounting under
Canadian GAAP. Significant progress has been made in this area, although the work is not yet completed.

In addition, IFRS
permits PP&E to be measured at fair value or amortized cost. In this regard, APUCexpects to continue to reflect PP&E at amortized costs.

In July 2009, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued an exposure draft providing guidance on accounting for rate-regulated activities. In light of the responses
received on the exposure draft, the IASB decided to further analyze the technical merits as to whether regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities can be recognized in accordance with the Conceptual Framework and to provide a revised project
timeline when their analysis is completed. This revised approach, will likely result in Canadian utilities such as APUC having to convert to IFRS before an IFRS standard for rate-regulated activities is finalized, if any. In this context, the IASB
tentatively decided to approve an IFRS 1 exemption which would allow Liberty Water to use the carrying amount of PP&E as its deemed cost at the date of transition to IFRSs.

Impairment of long-lived assets

Canadian GAAP impairment testing for long-lived assets involves two steps, the first of which compares the asset carrying values with undiscounted future cash flows to determine whether impairment exists.
If the carrying value exceeds the amount recoverable on an undiscounted basis, then the carrying values are written down to estimated fair value. IFRS uses a one-step approach for both testing for and measurement of impairment, with an asset
carrying value compared directly with the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use (which uses discounted future cash flows). This may result in more frequent write-downs where carrying values of assets were previously considered
recoverable under Canadian GAAP on an undiscounted cash flow basis, but could not be supported on a discounted cash flow basis. The work in this area will be performed once the carrying value of assets, namely PP&E, under IFRS as been assessed
and finalized.

Translation of foreign currency operations

IFRS does not have the same concept of self-sustaining or integrated operations, as under Canadian GAAP. IFRS requires each entity to
determine its functional currency using a hierarchy of criteria. Under Canadian GAAP, the power generation facilities operating in the U.S. are considered integrated operations and translated into Canadian dollars using the temporal method whereby
current rates of exchange are used for monetary assets and liabilities, historical rates of exchange for non-monetary assets and liabilities and average rates of exchange for revenues and expenses, except amortization which is translated at the
rates of exchange applicable to the related assets. Gains and losses resulting from these translation adjustments are included in income. Under IFRS, APUC expects that its U.S.



53



---

operations will all be considered to have a U.S. dollar functional currency. The assets and liabilities of these operations will be translated into Canadian dollars at the rate prevailing at the
balance sheet date while revenues and expenses to be converted using average rates for the period. Unrealized gains or losses arising as a result of the translation of the operations of self-sustaining operations will be reported as a component of
Other Comprehensive Income in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

APUC also intends to avail itself of the
IFRS 1 exemption to reset its foreign currency translation account to nil by transferring the amount to retained earnings on transition.

Business combinations

No significant immediate impact on the
financial statements is anticipated on adoption of IFRS as APUC expects to take advantage of the IFRS 1 exemption which avoids the requirement to retrospectively restate all business combinations prior to the date of transition to IFRS, subject to
certain balance sheet adjustments. Going forward, a number of differences between IFRS and Canadian GAAP will affect APUCs business acquisitions. Under IFRS, all assets and liabilities of an acquired business are recorded at fair value.
Estimated obligations for contingent considerations and contingencies are also recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. In addition, acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred. Under Canadian GAAP, acquisition-related costs form part
of the consideration paid for the acquisition and contingent considerations are recorded as part of the cost of the acquisition when the contingency is resolved and the consideration is issued or becomes issuable.



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |                                                                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Activity                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  | Milestone/Deadlines                                                                                                                                                                                                |  | Progress to date                                                                                                                                                   
|Identify relevant differences between IFRS and Canadian GAAP, design and implement solutions.  Evaluate and select one-time and ongoing accounting policy alternatives.  Quantify the effects of changeover to IFRS.  Prepare draft IFRS format financial statements. |  | Assessment and quantification of the significant effects of the changeover completed by approximately the third quarter of
2010.  Final selection of accounting policy alternatives by the fourth
quarter of 2010. |  | Fundamental IFRS/GAAP differences identified.  Assessment and quantification is underway.  Draft IFRS format financial statements presented to the Audit Committee.

Financial reporting expertise

APUC hired subject matter experts to co-ordinate, manage and execute the changeover process. APUCs key personnel and Audit Committee members have received and will continue to invest in various
training courses with regards to IFRS rules and the impact it will have on APUCs reporting requirements. Internal training will be developed for accounting employees involved with the implementation as well as employees in the operating
facilities whose processes and procedures will be affected by IFRS.



|                                                          |  |                                                                                                                                                                |  |                                                                                               
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Activity                                                  |  | Milestone/Deadlines                                                                                                                                            |  | Progress to date                                                                              
|Define and introduce appropriate level of IFRS expertise. |  | Audit Committee training in advance of accounting policy decisions.  Training for accounting and operations as each area is rolled out, no later than Q4
2010. |  | Key areas training presented to Audit Committee members in 2009.  Other areas are in progress.



54



---

Information systems

APUC is reviewing the needs for systems upgrades and modifications. However, APUC does not expect combining the IFRS conversion with major IT
system conversion.



|                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |                                                                                            |  |                                                   
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Activity                                                                                                                                                                                    |  | Milestone/Deadlines                                                                        |  | Progress to date                                  
|Identify and address changes required to IT systems.  Evaluate and select methods to address need for dual record-keeping during 2010 for comparative and budget planning purposes in 2011. |  | Changes to significant systems and dual reporting completed for the third quarter of 2010. |  | IT assessment for the critical areas is under way.

Internal controls

The Internal Control group is involved every step of the way in the assessment of
changes. Investor relations will be updated once the impacts of the transition to IFRS are better understood which will most likely be sometime in 2010 or 2011.



|                                                                                                                             |  |                                                                                                                            |  |                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Activity                                                                                                                     |  | Milestone/Deadlines                                                                                                        |  | Progress to date                                            
|Identify and address changes required to ICOFR and DC&P to financial systems.  Assess design and effectiveness implications. |  | Changes to significant systems assessed and designed by Q3 2010. Effectiveness of internal controls signed off by Q4 2010. |  | ICOFR & DC&P assessment for the critical areas is under way.

Business matters

APUCs senior secured revolving operating and
acquisition credit facilities mature on January, 14, 2011. Accordingly, APUC will be in a position to review and amend any financial covenants impacted by IFRS during the renewal process.



|                                                                                                                                                     |  |                                                                                             |  |                                      
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Activity                                                                                                                                             |  | Milestone/Deadlines                                                                         |  | Progress to date                     
|Identify and address changes required to business matters such as bank covenants, compensation, internal reporting, budgeting and rate case filings. |  | Changes to significant systems and dual reporting completed for the fourth quarter of 2010. |  | Bank discussions have been initiated.



55