alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 00-123] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration                               ( print page 60692)                            announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space Science Advisory Committee, Sun-Earth Connection Advisory Subcommittee.                     

# DATES:

Wednesday, October 25, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Thursday, October 26, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m; Friday, October 27, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to Noon. 

# ADDRESSES:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Conference Room 6H46, 300 E Street, SW, Washington, DC, 20546. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. George L. Withbroe, Code S, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-2150. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics: 

—Sun-Earth Connection Program Overview: Budget, Ongoing Program, Future Activities

—Research and Analysis Program 

—Solar Terrestrial Probe Program

—Living with a Star Program 

—Discussion and Writing Groups 

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 

Dated: October 5, 2000.

Beth M. McCormick,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

[FR Doc. 00-26202 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
- 1

- Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

s ascha.vanderbellen@ delta .com

August 2 2 , 2012

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc.

For a n Allocation of U.S.

- Chin a Frequencies

Docket DOT

- OST

- 2010

- 0285

Dear Ms. Rosenberg :

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above

referenced application and there are no objec tions. In these circumstances, we urge that the

applic ation be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois  60604

November 30, 2012

Before

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

ILANA D. ROVNER, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

Nos. 10‐3787, 10‐3990 & 11‐1123

IN RE:

SENTINEL MANAGEMENT GROUP,

INC.,

Debtor.

APPEAL OF: FREDERICK J. GREDE,

not individually but as Liquidation

Trustee of the Sentinel Liquidation

Trust.

Appeals from the United States District

Court for the Northern District

of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 1:08‐cv‐02582

James B. Zagel,

Judge.

The opinion of this court issued on August 9, 2012, is WITHDRAWN and the

judgment is VACATED. This appeal remains under consideration by the panel.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Union Pacific Railroad Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Richard K. Davidson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                               
|--- |  | ------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Richard K. Davidson       
|    |  | Richard K. Davidson           
|    |  | Chairman and                  
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer       
|    |  | Union Pacific Railroad Company



August 6, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Union Pacific Railroad Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Robert M. Knight, Jr., Executive Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|    |  |                                       
|--- |  | --------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Robert M. Knight, Jr.             
|    |  | Robert M. Knight, Jr.                 
|    |  | Executive Vice President - Finance and
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer               
|    |  | Union Pacific Railroad Company        



August 6, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



31
# AGENCY:

Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.

# ACTION:

Change starting time for information meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The information meeting scheduled to be held in Bradley Beach, New Jersey, on February 28, 2000, will begin at 7:30 p.m., and not 7:00 p.m., as previously announced in the                         **Federal Register**                         at Vol. 65, No. 6, Page 1413, “Outer Continental Shelf Request for Information and Interest in a Commercial Sand and Gravel Lease Sale Offshore Northern New Jersey.”                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Carol A. Hartgen, Chief, International Activities and Marine Minerals Division, (703) 787-1300.

Dated: February 1, 2000.

Carol A. Hartgen,

Chief, International Activities and Marine Minerals Division, Minerals Management Service.

[FR Doc. 00-2622  Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PEDRO COLON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 86 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PEDRO COLON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 87 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PEDRO COLON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 88 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 89 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court
[86 EAL 2020, 87 EAL 2020, 88 EAL 2020, 89 EAL 2020 and 90 EAL 2020] - 2

PEDRO COLON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PEDRO COLON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 90 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the decision or consideration of these matters.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0451 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-122-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 120L/2668/13

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### Anthony Covello, Plaintiff, *v.*County *of*Suffolk, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Suffolk County,

September 24, 1957.

*Lloyd P. Dodge*for defendant.

*Lindsay R. Henry*for plaintiff.

D. Ormonde Bitches, J.

Defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that the complaint is insufficient because it fails to allege that the plaintiff served the required notice of claim upon the defendant in the manner provided by statute. The action is one for damages as the result of the alleged invasion of plaintiff’s property rights. Paragraph second of the complaint alleges in substance the timely service of the notice of claim upon the county by service upon the clerk of the board of supervisors. The defendant claims that the motion must be granted because the plaintiff failed to serve the county attorney of Suffolk County with the notice of claim. There is no dispute but that the County of Suffolk has had a county attorney for many years, and concededly he was never served with the notice of claim, but the plaintiff contends that service upon him was *73not necessary and that service upon the clerk of the board of supervisors was sufficient. Section 52 of the County Law provides that in an action such as the instant one, a notice of claim must be served upon the county in compliance with section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. Subdivision 3 of such last-mentioned section requires that a notice of claim shall be served upon the county either personally or by registered mail, by delivering the notice, or a copy thereof, to the person, officer, agent, clerk or employee, designated by law as a person to whom a summons in an action in the Supreme Court issued against such party may be delivered. Subdivision 3 of section 228 of the Civil Practice Act, prescribes those persons upon whom service must be effected in an action against a county, namely, the chairman or clerk of the board of supervisors, the county clerk, or the county treasurer, and in addition thereto upon the county attorney, if the county has a county attorney, and otherwise upon the clerk of the board of supervisors of the county. The section is mandatory and the plaintiff has not complied with it. The notice of claim should be served upon the county attorney as well as the clerk of the board of supervisors. The complaint having failed to allege that he was served, it does not state facts sufficient to state a cause of action. Accordingly, the motion is granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection  with this annual  report on Form 10-KSB of Tennessee  Valley
Financial  Holdings,  Inc.,  I,  Thomas E.  Tuck,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of
Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings,  Inc., certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.   The report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of Tennessee
     Valley Financial Holdings, Inc.



Date:  March 28, 2005             /s/ Thomas E. Tuck
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Thomas E. Tuck
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
```

                                 STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
                             ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the
"Quarterly Report"), of Southern California Edison Company (the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the best
of his knowledge, that:

1.       The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
              Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2.       The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
              financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 8, 2004
                                                      /s/ Alan J. Fohrer
                                                      ---------------------------------------------
                                                      Alan J. Fohrer
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      Southern California Edison Company

                                                      /s/ W. James Scilacci
                                                      ---------------------------------------------
                                                      W. James Scilacci
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                                      Southern California Edison Company

This statement accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, AND VMWARE, INC.

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00481-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

LETTER OF REQUEST FOR FOREIGN DISCOVERY

Case 6:20-cv-00481-ADA Document 47 Filed 11/06/20 Page 1 of 3
1

Defendants Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., EMC Corporation, and VMware, Inc. 

(collectively “Defendants”) seek foreign discovery from third party witnesses residing in France. 

Defendants have attached Appendices with Letters of Request which include Document Requests

and Deposition Topics. Defendants respectfully request that the Court execute the Letters of 

Request attached as Appendices H and N. Defendants further request that, after the Court has 

signed the Letters of Request, the Clerk of this Court authenticate the Court’s signature under the 

seal of this Court, and return the original signed and sealed executed Letters, and two certified 

copies of the signed and sealed executed Letters, to Defendants’ counsel, Barry K. Shelton, for 

delivery to the proper authority.

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, indicated 

that it reserves the right to serve its own foreign discovery in the future.

Dated: November 6, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 6:20-cv-00481-ADA Document 47 Filed 11/06/20 Page 2 of 3
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 6, 2020, all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the 

Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Case 6:20-cv-00481-ADA Document 47 Filed 11/06/20 Page 3 of 3
| 1. | Such Annual Report on Form      10-K for the year      ending December      31, 2008, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year      ending December      31, 2008, fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of MEDASORB TECHNOLOGIES      CORPORATION |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:        April 10, 2009         |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                          |
| /s/ Phillip      Chan                         |
| Phillip      ChanChief      Executive Officer |

----
Exhibit 99.1    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   Board of Directors The Standard Register Company Dayton, Ohio  We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of July 1, 2007 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.  Based upon our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 6, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.   /S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP   Dayton, Ohio July 27, 2007