alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 14.1

ENBRIDGE ENERGY MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.  ENBRIDGE ENERGY COMPANY, INC.    CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS

Applicability

For purposes of this code, the term "Company" includes 1) Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. ("EEM") in its individual capacity and in its capacity as
delegate of the general partner of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. ("EEP"), 2) EEP and 3) Enbridge Energy Company, Inc., the general partner of EEP.

While
all directors, officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries are required to adhere to the Company's Statement on Business Conduct, the Company's Senior Financial
Officers are further subject to the following additional, specific policies. For purposes of this code, "Senior Financial Officers" shall include the principal executive officer, the principal
financial officer, the principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. In the event of the change of an officer's title or designation as a principal officer, or
the addition of an officer to the foregoing definition, an officer performing a similar function shall be included.

Standards of Conduct



1

---



The
Board of Directors (the "Board") shall determine, or designate appropriate persons to determine, appropriate actions to be taken in the event of violations of these policies by the
Company's Senior Financial Officers. Such actions shall be reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote accountability for adherence to these policies, and may include written notices to the
individual involved that the Board has determined that there has been a violation, censure by the Board, demotion or re-assignment of the individual involved, suspension with or without
pay or benefits (as determined by the Board) and termination of the individual's employment. In determining what action is appropriate in a particular case, the Board of Directors or its designee
shall take into account all relevant information, including the nature and severity of the violation, whether the violation was a single occurrence or repeated occurrences, whether the violation
appears to have been intentional or inadvertent, whether the individual in question had been advised prior to the violation as to the proper course of action and whether or not the individual in
question had committed other violations in the past.

The
Board shall have the sole and absolute discretionary authority to approve an deviation or waiver from this code. Any amendment to or waiver from, and the grounds therefor, this code
shall be promptly posted on EEP's website at www.enbridgepartners.com and EEM's website at www.enbridgemanagement.com.

2

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP98-391-005]

Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG), tendered for filing its report of revenues and credits during the first year of service under Rate Schedule SS-1, CIG's Swing Service.

CIG states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all parties on the Commission's official service list in this docket.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before October 12, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call (202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26041 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
                               CREDIT CORPORATION

                              Michael J. Gillespie
                               Accounting Director

                              Officer's Certificate

Pursuant to the Servicing Agreement between Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Credit
Corporation, formerly known as NOVUS Financial Corporation, as seller and
servicer (referred to herein in such capacity as the "Servicer"), and Sequoia
Mortgage Trust 6,7,8,9,11,12; 2003-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8;
2004-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12, the undersigned, hereby states that:

      (1) A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance
under the Servicing Agreement during the calendar year ended December 31, 2004
has been made under my supervision; and

      (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

                                        MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
                                        CREDIT CORPORATION

                                        BY /s/ Douglas J. Bush
                                           ---------------------------
                                               Douglas J. Bush

                                        Title Director

                                        Dated as of December 31, 2004

                                        By /s/ David Bianucci
                                           ------------------------------
                                               David Bianucci

                                        Title Vice President

                                        Dated as of December 31, 2004

  2500 Lake Cook Road, 1 East, Riverwoods, Illinois 60015 Tel (224) 405-1903
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., et al.

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00480-ADA

ORDER RESETTING JURY SELECTION SELECTION AND TRIAL

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is reset for

JURY SELECTION AND TRIAL in District Courtroom #1, on the Third Floor of the United

States Courthouse, 800 Franklin Ave, Wacoaco, TX, on Monday, October 03, 2022 at 09:00 AM.

reset

IT 20th day of April, 2022.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 188 Filed 04/20/22 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-21-000]

Take notice that on October 2, 2000, Midwestern Gas Transmission Company (Midwestern), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Third Revised Sheet No. 80 and First Revised Sheet No. 124, with an effective date of November 1, 2000.

Midwestern states that the purpose of this filing is to revise its tariff in order to modify the applicability of the right of first refusal as directed by the Commission in Order Nos. 637, 637-A, and 673-B.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a  party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26132 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHIRLEY BROWN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 18

- 56625

D.C. No. 2:18

- cv

- 03418

- DDP

- AGR

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 19, 2019 **

Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges

.

Shirley Brown appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

her action alleging federal and state law claims arising from the foreclosure sale of

her property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dism issal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Kwan v. SanMedica

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 26 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 56625

Int’l , 854 F.3d 1088, 1093 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Brown’s wrongful foreclosure and

fraud claim s under California law because Brown failed to allege facts sufficient to

state a plausible claim

. See Hebbe v. Pliler , 627 F.3d 338, 341

- 42 (9th Cir. 2010)

(although pro se pleadings are construed liberally, a plaintiff must present factual

allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief); Robinson Helicopter Co.

v. Dana Corp ., 102 P.3d 268, 274 (Cal. 2004) (elements of fraud claim); Sciarratta

v. U.S. Bank Nat ’ l Assn , 202 Cal. Rptr. 3d 219, 226 ( Ct. App. 2016) ( elements of

wrongful foreclosure claim)

. Brown’s contention that the bankruptcy of

LandAmerica Financial Group, the parent company of the original trustee under

the deed of trust, rende red the se foreclosure proceedings wrongful is unpersuasive.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raise d for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3 d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         $39,033
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             515
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    150,498
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         306,882
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           297,202
<LOANS>                                        658,253
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,449
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,195,953
<DEPOSITS>                                     825,942
<SHORT-TERM>                                   190,849
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             62,822
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,443
<COMMON>                                         8,726
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,195,953
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,182
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,745
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    36
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                22,963
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,099
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,864
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,413
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,609
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,418
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,879
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,879
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.85
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,587
<LOANS-PAST>                                       208
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    318
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,117
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,185
<RECOVERIES>                                       104
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,449
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,159
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            290


</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 26, 2010

s0519 

# Order

May 26, 2010

140290

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140290 COA: 293561 Saginaw CC: 07-029101-FC MARLO ALEXANDER MEDINA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 30, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH



### , J., would grant leave to appeal.
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (NOPR) 

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT (TSD) 

ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL 

AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT: 

Small Electric Motors 

November 24, 2009
 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Assistant Secretary 

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

Building Technologies Program 

Appliance and Commercial Equipment Standards 

Washington, DC 20585 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 33
 

 

This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy
 

by staff members of
 

Navigant Consulting, Inc., 

and 

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 33
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4801 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4801

   To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain portable slow 
                                cookers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain portable slow 
                                cookers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PORTABLE SLOW COOKERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Portable Slow       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Cooker with                                                       12/31/2015
                          single locking
                          clip lid
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8516.79.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOHN LYNCH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 45 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOHN LYNCH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 46 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of July, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25990]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Agency Holding Meeting: National Science Foundation, National 
Science Board.
    Date and Time: October 19, 2000: 11:45 a.m.-12:00 Noon, Closed 
Session; October 19, 2000: 1:00 p.m.-3:30 p.m., Closed Session; October 
19, 2000: 3:30 p.m.-6:00 p.m., Open Session.
    Place: The National Science Foundation, Room 1235, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Status: Part of this meeting will be closed to the public; Part of 
this meeting will be open to the public.

Matters to be Considered

Thursday, October 19

Closed Session (11:45 a.m.-12:00 Noon)
--Closed Session Minutes, August 2000
--Personnel
Closed Session (1:00 p.m.-3:30 p.m.)
--Awards and Agreements
--FY 2002 Budget
Open Session (3:30 p.m.-6:00 p.m.)
--Swearing-in, NSB Nominees
--Open Session Minutes, August 2000
--Closed Session Items for December 2000
--Chairman's Report
--Director's Report
--NSF Planning Issues
    Mathematics Initiative
    Workforce Initiative
    NSF Stipends
--NSB 50th Anniversary Commemorative Booklet
--Committee Reports

Marta Cehelsky,
Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25990 Filed 10-4-00; 4:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
CAPITO L OFFIC E

STAT E CAPITO L ROO M 406 2 SACRAMENT O C A9581 4 TE L (916 ) 651-401 9 FA X 1916 ) 32 4 754 4 DISTRIC TOFFICE S 265 5 FIRS TSTREE T SUIT E 23 0 SIM I VALLEY , C A9306 5 TEL(805 1 306-888 6 FA X (805 ) 306-889 9 61 0 ANACAP ASTREE T UNI TB- 4 SANT ABARBARA , C A9310 1 TE L (805 ) 965-OS6 2 FA X (805 ) 965-070 1 SENATO R TON YSTRICKLAN D ASSISTAN TMINORIT YLEADE R NINETEENT H SENAT E DISTRIC T

February 24 , 201 0

Th e Honorabl e Raymon dH

. LaHoo d Secretary U.S

. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Docke t DOT-OST-2010-001 8 COMMITTEE S HEALT H VICE-CHAJ R BUDGE T& FISCA L REVIE W ENERGY , UTILITIE S & COMMUNICATION S ELECTIONS , REAPPORTIONMEN T& CONSTITUTIONA L AMENDMENT S SELEC TCOMMITTE E O N CALIFORNIA' S WIN E INDUSTR Y



### S I 0-100302-03 6 CONTRO L N O

Dea r Mr

. Secretary : I I respectfull y as k

yo u t o approv e America nAirlines ' reques t for allocatio no f

tw o dail y U.S.-Haned aslo t

pair s t o operat e year-roun dschedule dai r transportatio nfromNew'York an dLo s Angele s t o Toky o Haneda

. American' s propose dservic e clearl y representslit^ e bes t publi c interes t

us e fo r tw o o f th e four frequencie s t o b e awarde di nthi s proceeding , a s Ne w Yor

k an dLo s Angele s ar e fa

r an daway th e larges t

trave l market s betwee nth e U.S

. mainlan dan dTokyo

. Furthermore , American' s propose dservic e wil l provid e significan t connectin g opportunities , providin g benefit s t o eve nmor e consumers . A tota l o f 1 7 U.S

. citie s wil l enjo y on-lin e servic e beyon dNew Yor k i non e o r bothdirections , an d2 0 beyon dLo s Angeles

. Al l 1 0 o f

th e larges t

U.S

. mainland-Toky o market s wil l gai non-lin e servic e t o Haned aunde r

American' s proposal , includin g Sa nFrancisco , Chicago , La s Vegas , Seattle , Washington , Boston , Orlando , an dPortlan dthroug hroundtri p connections

. I encourage th e Departmen t o f Transportatio nt o approv e American' s application , a s i t wil l benefi t

th e broades t

publi c interes t

an dwil l hav e apositiv e impac t o nai r trave l b y offerin g customer s mor e service , schedulin g an dpricin g option s t o choos e from

. ; • • • o

c 5

Sincerely ,

Senatoria l Distric t