alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit8.1

|                                                 |  |  |                              |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|--|------------------------------|
| Nameof Subsidiary                               |  |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation |
| Mining Investments (Jersey)Limited              |  |  | Jersey, Channel Islands      |
| MorilaLimited                                   |  |  | Jersey, ChannelIslands       |
| Société des Mines de MorilaSA     |  |  | Republic of Mali             |
| Randgold Resources(Côte d'Ivoire) Limited |  |  | Jersey, ChannelIslands       |
| Randgold Resources Côte d'IvoireSARL      |  |  | Côte d'Ivoire          |
| RandgoldResources (Mali) Limited                |  |  | Jersey, ChannelIslands       |
| Randgold Resources Mali LimitedSARL             |  |  | Republic of Mali             |
| Randgold Resources(Senegal) Limited             |  |  | Jersey, ChannelIslands       |
| Randgold Resources (Somilo)Limited              |  |  | Jersey, ChannelIslands       |
| Société des Mines de LouloSA      |  |  | Republic of Mali             |
| Randgold ResourcesTanzania (T) Limited          |  |  | Tanzania                     |
| Seven BridgesTrading 14 (Proprietary) Limited   |  |  | Republic of SouthAfrica      |
| Randgold Resources (Burkina)Limited             |  |  | Jersey, ChannelIslands       |
|                                                 |

----
#### In the Matter of Richard W. Brown, Petitioner, v John Doyle, as Justice of the Supreme Court of County of Monroe, Respondent.

Petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition disqualifying respondent, a Supreme Court Justice, from sitting as Judge or as the trier of fact on petitioner’s posttrial motion, pursuant to CPL 440.10, to vacate the judgment entered against him in a criminal action. Petitioner seeks to disqualify respondent, who presided over petitioner’s criminal trial, because respondent "has previously exhibited a propen*980sity for prejudice against him” and because petitioner intends to call respondent as a witness at any hearing held on his CPL article 440 motion.

"[T]he extraordinary remedy of prohibition lies only where there is a clear legal right, and only when a court (if a court is involved) acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers in a proceeding over which it has jurisdiction *(Matter of Steingut v Gold,*42 NY2d 311, 315; *Matter of Dondi v Jones,*40 NY2d 8, 13; *La Rocca v Lane,*37 NY2d 575, 578-579; *Matter of State of New York v King,*36 NY2d 59, 62; *Matter of Proskin v County Ct.,*30 NY2d 15, 18; *Matter of Lee v County Ct.,*27 NY2d 432, 436-437)” *(Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 352-353). Under the circumstances of this case, the writ of prohibition does not lie.

Moreover, the petition alleges no basis for the disqualification of the Justice pursuant to Judiciary Law § 14 *(see, Matter of Katz v Denzer, 70*AD2d 548, 549). Petitioner only asserts a claim of alleged actual bias of the Trial Justice. With respect to that claim, “the judge himself is the sole arbiter” *(People v Patrick,*183 NY 52, 54; *see also, People v Moreno, 70*NY2d 403, 405-406). "Even if actual bias or prejudice is shown, it would not be grounds for disqualification but would only be reviewable on appeal on a showing that it had unjustly affected the result” *(Matter of Katz v Denzer, supra,*at 549). (Original art 78 proceeding.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
#### DYE v. STATE.

No. 25876.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 4, 1952.

W. E. Pinkston, Dallas, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a conviction for murder, with punishment assessed at ten years in the penitentiary.

Notice of appeal to this court was given on March 11, 1952, at the time of passage of sentence.

The state moves to dismiss the appeal because of appellant’s escape from custody pending the appeal. As supporting the motion, the state presents the affidavit of the sheriff- of Kaufman County showing that on April 22, 1952, appellant escaped from his jail cell and was thereafter recaptured in another *county*and returned to custody.

Under the express and mandatory provisions of Art. 824, Vernon’s C.C.P., an escape from custody automatically operates to terminate the jurisdiction of this court over an appeal by the escapee. The statute also provides for setting aside the order of dismissal upon the voluntary return of *203the escapee within ten days to the officer from whom he escaped.

The direct question here involved was before this court in Pendergrass v. State, 92 Tex.Cr.R. 467, 244 S.W. 513, wherein we held that a recapture after being at liberty one day was not a voluntary return within the meaning of the statute.

Accordingly, the state’s motion to dismiss the appeal is well taken and the appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
P.1 

OAR Box 1252 

Prepped by Candice Davis 

Document Number: 

46) ll-B-6 

Docket Number: 

A-90-22 

Printed 5/21/2008 11:46.01 AM Sheet 46 of 184 
P.2 

MEMORANDU M 

DATE: August 28, 1991 

TO: HON Project File 

FROM: Julie Anne Probert 

SUBJECT: Annual Electricity /Co^ts for Motors that Power Fans in 

a Vapor Collection System for Transfer Loading Racks 

The purpose of this memorandum is to document the 

assumptions made in estimating the electricity costs for 

operating the motor that powers the fan in a vapor collection 

system for transfer racks. Costs are presented as a function of 

vent stream flow rate, pressure drop through piping, and hours of 

operation. Pressure drop is a function of the distance between 

the transfer rack and the control device. 

The fan and motor must operate during loading operations and 

for a time afterward to remove VOC vapors that evaporate from 

residual liquid in the loading arms. As a conservative estimate, 

it is assumed that the fan and motor will operate for a period 

twice that of actual loading operations. 

Equations for estimating the capital cost of the fan and 

motor are presented in a separate memorandum. 

t^gnn ^21 
P.3 

&<Srj8l2 ><S)Ra'7l!®M 

CALCULATION SHEET 

<firtMATtrapWN'i. j P~TXV; /^^\ i ^^ ~ DATE , CHECKED, 

pun icr/ W OK \ Ini ^ S-t-Clr^ JOB NO 

CALC. NO. 

, DATE 

SUBJECTJ gety\ain/) Cosbs -fey- UOVT^ S 

r 

SHEET=_ 0F= .SHEETS 

ClAixpV 3>; o f M^JL Q/VQPS Co^-W. Cost MA^LXAX <?L«£Ws\ 

6[e.c4war^ 

rv\p-W € -(-fl ci €v-t C 

"> 

"TlrU, »wob/ - i ^ "HAJL. \l&J{?Ovx C^>[\tcJrioy\ SvxsUirvo , &>r <X- ^a-.*2£ ^ vrvCUL 

V^LStduU ^ llflLMtet 1 W -VUc. ...lofirVfiUvvA. ..flUOVxC, j i __. ... J_ ; 

.. of.. io.D^o^/miAsA.I^J., _+ L !,„. .j U._s? 

Co^b &/- .M^>Hvr_ .^Ls: , .:

 :

 .

:

 '. ...... : J..- , ,—. 

^ ^8fl&) _ oU&Q i _.j _j j _j ;. . l^vA/L/' ; J. 

._. AjckUib^:: _ L_j__i L..' \ £TM.L/^Jl^Hapl A ^Ws 

w^pja-s?- ! '...': j j_ ! :J i 1 1 L 

dctinte, 

' \urb: 2E,mL CfcjJ^^ ^ ffi^&citeiiLUfe^U 

J . t £~\ i • i i H>J Rlifccfc*. 

8
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                     $    45,625
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             515
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    139,178
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         280,520
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           275,592
<LOANS>                                        647,315
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,147,040
<DEPOSITS>                                     778,639
<SHORT-TERM>                                   173,129
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             60,449
<LONG-TERM>                                     31,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,443
<COMMON>                                         8,325
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,147,040
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 40,716
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               16,249
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   446
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                57,411
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,301
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,217
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           39,194
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,118
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 30,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,775
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,701
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,701
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.12
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,470
<LOANS-PAST>                                        71
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,458
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,156
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,125
<RECOVERIES>                                       281
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,430
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,218
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            212


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|Name of Entity                               |  | State/Country of Organization
|-------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|BladeLogic Deutschland GmbH                  |  | Germany                      
|BladeLogic France, Sarl                      |  | France                       
|BladeLogic Italy srl.                        |  | Italy                        
|BladeLogic Japan Kabushiki Kaisha            |  | Japan                        
|BladeLogic Netherlands B.V.                  |  | Netherlands                  
|BladeLogic Software Services Private Limited |  | India                        
|BladeLogic Switzerland GmbH                  |  | Switzerland                  
|BladeLogic UK, Limited                       |  | United Kingdom               

---



QuickLinks
CONCRETE
CASTING INCORPORATED




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Concrete Casting Incorporated (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Kevin J. Asher, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
            Kevin
      J. AsherKevin
      J. AsherChief
      Executive Officer
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              Chief
      Accounting OfficerMay
      15, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Concrete Casting Incorporated and will be retained by Concrete
Casting Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 75103-75104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29606]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

25 CFR Parts 81 and 82

[BIA-2014-0006; K00103 12/13 A3A10; 134D0102DR-DS5A300000-
DR.5A311.IA000113]
RIN 1076-AE93

Secretarial Election Procedures

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that the Department of the Interior will 
extend the comment period on the proposed amending regulations 
governing Secretarial elections and petitioning procedures to January 
16, 2015.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule published October 9, 2014 (79 FR 
61021) must be received by January 16, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:

--Federal rulemaking portal: http://www.regulations.gov. The rule is 
listed under the agency name ``Bureau of Indian Affairs.'' The rule has 
been assigned Docket ID: BIA-2014-0006.
--Email: laurel.ironcloud@bia.gov. Include ``Part 81'' in the subject 
line of the message.
--Mail or hand-delivery: Chief, Division of Tribal Government Services, 
Office of Indian Services, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of the 
Interior, 1849 C Street NW., Mail Stop 4513--MIB, Washington, DC 20240.

    We cannot ensure that comments received after the close of the 
comment period (see DATES) will be included in the docket for this 
rulemaking and considered. Comments sent to an address other than those 
listed here will not be included in the docket for this rulemaking.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laurel Iron Cloud, Chief, Division 
of Tribal Government Services, Central

[[Page 75104]]

Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs at telephone: (202) 513-7641.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  On October 9, 2014, we published a proposed 
rule amending 25 CFR parts 81 (Secretarial Elections) and 82 
(Petitioning Procedures), combining them into one Code of Federal 
Regulations part at 25 CFR part 81. See 79 FR 61021. On October 20, 
2014, we published a notice announcing three consultation sessions. See 
79 FR 62587.
    The proposed rule is available at: http://www.bia.gov/WhoWeAre/AS-IA/ORM/SecElections/index.htm.

    Dated: December 10, 2014.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-29606 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4J-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4987 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4987

       To suspend temporarily the duty on wide angle reflectors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on wide angle reflectors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WIDE ANGLE REFLECTORS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Wide angle          Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          reflectors                                                        12/31/2015
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8714.99.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-383-011]


Dominion Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Negotiated Rate Filing

October 4, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Dominion Transmission, Inc. 
(DTI) (formerly CNG Transmission Corporation) tendered for filing to 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) the following 
tariff sheet for disclosure of a recently amended negotiated rate 
transaction.

First Revised Sheet No. 1400

    DTI requests an effective date of October 1, 2000, for the 
negotiated rate.
    DTI states that copies of the filing have been served on all 
parties on the official service list created by the Secretary in this 
proceeding, DTI's customers, and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance 
with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and 
Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance 
with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call (202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26064 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, William J. Fox, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K,and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reportsfiled in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report,of Lehman ABS Corporation, on behalf of Corporate Backed Trust Certificates,Motorola Debenture-Backed Series 2002-12 Trust****(the“Trust”);

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, the information in thesereports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicinginformation required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under thepooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports isincluded in these reports; and

 

4.               I am responsible for reviewing the activitiesperformed by the Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing, orsimilar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance reviewrequired under that agreement, and except as disclosed in these reports, theDepositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust NationalAssociation, as Trustee.

 

Date:  March 31, 2010

 
| By:    | /s/ William J Fox |                                                 |
|--------|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:             | William J. Fox                                       |   |
|   | Title:            | Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5512 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5512

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to realign divisions within two 
                          judicial districts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Divisional Realignment Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. REALIGNMENT WITHIN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.

    Section 105(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Iron,'' and ``Saint 
        Genevieve,''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) by inserting ``Iron,'' after ``Dunklin,''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``Saint Genevieve,'' after 
                ``Ripley,''.

SEC. 3. REALIGNMENT WITHIN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI.

    Section 104 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking 
subsection (a) and inserting the following:
    ``(a) The northern district comprises three divisions.
            ``(1) The Aberdeen Division comprises the counties of 
        Alcorn, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Clay, Itawamba, Lee, Lowndes, 
        Monroe, Oktibbeha, Prentiss, Tishomingo, Webster, and Winston.
            ``Court for the Aberdeen Division shall be held at 
        Aberdeen, Ackerman, and Corinth.
            ``(2) The Oxford Division comprises the counties of Benton, 
        Calhoun, DeSoto, Lafayette, Marshall, Panola, Pontotoc, 
        Quitman, Tallahatchie, Tate, Tippah, Tunica, Union, and 
        Yalobusha.
            ``Court for the Oxford Division shall be held at Oxford.
            ``(3) The Greenville Division comprises the counties of 
        Attala, Bolivar, Carroll, Coahoma, Grenada, Humphreys, Leflore, 
        Montgomery, Sunflower, and Washington.
            ``Court for the Greenville Division shall be held at 
        Clarksdale, Cleveland, and Greenville.''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act take effect on the 60th day after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 30, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5512

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 28, United States Code, to realign divisions within two 
                          judicial districts.
```