L & B 03554/0014/L1897755.DOCX/ 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

JONATHAN VILLARREAL,

Individually and derivatively on behalf

Of ZROBLACK, LLC

 Plaintiffs,

v.

JOHN SAENZ, et al., 

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 No. 5:20-cv-00571-OLG

 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS

TO THE HONORABLE RICHARD FARRER,

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

COME NOW Defendants MIGUEL VILLARREAL, JR., and GUNN, LEE, & CAVE, 

P.C. and move this Court for entry of an order authorizing the Parties (as defined herein) to file 

motions, responses, and replies pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 that exceed the 

page limits established under Local Rule CV-7. Plaintiffs JONATHAN VILLRREAL, 

individually and derivatively on behalf of ZROBLACK, LLC and Defendants JOHN SAENZ, 

MIGUEL VILLARREAL, JR., and GUNN, LEE, & CAVE, P.C. (collectively, the “Parties”) have 

reached an agreement related to the extension of page limits for motions to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ 

First Amended Verified Complaint, as well as the responses and replies thereto.

1. The Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Verified Complaint [Dkt. 35] that contains 322 

paragraphs and is 56 pages long. It asserts 11 causes of action and, in addition to monetary relief, 

requests multiple forms of declaratory, equitable, or injunctive relief.

2. The Defendants will be filing responsive motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12. Local Rule CV-7(d)-(f) mandates that such motions are limited to 20 pages, 

responses thereto are limited to 20 pages, and replies are limited to 10 pages. 

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 38 Filed 01/22/21 Page 1 of 3
L & B 03554/0014/L1897755.DOCX/ 2

3. Given the length and scope of the First Amended Verified Complaint, the Parties 

respectfully request that the page limits for the motions, responses, and replies be extended as 

follows:

a. The Motions shall not exceed 30 pages. 

b. The Responses shall not exceed 30 pages. 

c. The Replies shall not exceed 15 pages. 

4. Counsel has conferred regarding the requested relief via email. All Parties are in 

agreement with the extensions of page limitations set forth above.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Parties pray that the Court enter an order 

substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A permitting the Parties to exceed the page 

limits set forth in Local Rule CV-7, and for such other relief to which they may be entitled at law 

or equity. 

Dated January 22, 2021. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Natalie F. Wilson

LANGLEY & BANACK, INCORPORATED

745 E. Mulberry, Suite 700

San Antonio, Texas 78212

(210) 736-6600 Telephone

(210) 735-6889 Telecopier

Email: nwilson@langleybanack.com

GEORGE H. SPENCER, JR.

State Bar No. 18921001

NATALIE F. WILSON

State Bar No. 24067769

COUNSEL TO MIGUEL VILLARREAL, JR., and

GUNN, LEE & CAVE, PC

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 38 Filed 01/22/21 Page 2 of 3
L & B 03554/0014/L1897755.DOCX/ 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 22, 2021, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

instrument was served via the Court’s electronic transmission on:

Charles M.R. Vethan

Joseph L. Lanza

Steven A. Castello

VETHAN LAW FIRM

11459 Huebner Road, Suite 101

San Antonio, TX 78230

Counsel to Plaintiffs

David A. Vanderhider

Ryan J. Sullivan

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC

112 E. Pecan Street - Suite 1800

San Antonio, TX 78205

Counsel to Defendant John Saenz

/s/ Natalie F. Wilson

NATALIE F. WILSON

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 38 Filed 01/22/21 Page 3 of 3