alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVED: October28, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

In The Matter Of: Redemption Air, Inc. Respondent 

### OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## DEPARTMENT OF WASHINGTON, DC 

## TRANSPORTATION ) ) ) ) ) 

## 201• OCT 28 

## P ll: 55 Docket



## RRq)fl-9cft~M1**~NS** Case No. 2013AL030106
NOTICE OF HEARING Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(1) and§ 13.221, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Location a. The hearing will be held atthe James M. FitzgeraldU.S. Courthouse and Federal Building, 222 West7th Avenue, Room 229, Anchorage, AK99513 b. Briefcases, purses, packages, and other items will be subject to searchupon entry to the building. All individuals mustpresent a valid government-issued I.D. to enter. 2. Date a. The hearing will begin on April17, 2017. b. The courtroom is reserved through April 18, 2017. 3. Time a. The hearing will begin at 9:00 a.m. local time and endby 4:00 p.m. each day. b. The parties shall vacate the courthouse by 5:00 p.m. each day.

Attachment: Service List 0UGCAS M. RA WALD Administrative LawJudgeSERVICE LIST
- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001

Brent R. Cole,Respondent's Counsel Law Office ofBrent R. Cole, P.C. 821 N Street, Suite 208 Anchorage AK 99501 TEL: 907-277-8001 FAX: 907-277-8002 Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Enforcement Division, Western Team 222 West 7th Avenue, #14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-5271 FAX: 907-271-2800 ONE COPY

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant

**F~:** 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0115 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

PARKERVISION, INC.

vs.

INTEL CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00108-ADA

ORDER SETTING Discovery DISCOVERY HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

DISCOVERY HEARING in District Courtroom #1, on the Third Floor of the United States

Courthouse, 800 Franklin Ave, Waco, TX, on Wednesday, September 07, 2022 at 01:30 PM.

All parties and counsel must appear at this hearing.

Waco

set

IT 23rd day of August, 2022.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 157 Filed 08/23/22 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP99-327-003]

Take notice that on September 28, 2000, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing a reconciliation report that compares Order No. 528 (TOP) costs with amounts recovered through the TOP recovery surcharge.

Texas Gas states that this reconciliation filing is being made in accordance with Section 29.3(c) as found in Texas Gas's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, and in compliance with Commission Order dated July 20, 2000. Texas Gas states that it has over-recovered its TOP costs by $35,367, which will be refunded on October 19, 2000.

Texas Gas states that copies of the reconciliation report are being mailed to Texas Gas's jurisdictional customers, interested state commissions, and all parties appearing on the official service list.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before October 12, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call (202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26042 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Western District of Texas

Austin Division

TIFFANY MCKAY, §

§

Plaintiff § CASE # 1:20-cv-00547-RP

§

v. §

§

NATIONAL MANAGEMENT §

RECOVERY CORPORATION §

§

& §

§

HARTFORD CASUALTY §

INSURANCE COMPANY §

§

Defendants. §

STATUS REPORT AND NOTICE OF SETTLEENT

Plaintiff Tiffany McKay hereby files a status report pursuant to 

the Court’s July 13, 2020 Order (Dkt. 13).

Plaintiff and Defendant National Management Recovery 

Corporation (“NMRC”) have executed an agreement to resolve all 

claims against all parties.

Plaintiff’s counsel had anticipated and hoped settlement would 

be complete by this date but NMRC has experienced delays. Plaintiff 

believes the delays are not in bad faith but due to staff working 

remotely at NMRC. Plaintiff anticipates completing settlement and 
- 2 -

filing a notice of voluntary dismissal within 30 days. Plaintiff 

requests the Court retain this case on its docket for a further 30

days.

Respectfully Submitted,

By: /s Tyler Hickle

Plaintiff’s Attorney

Tyler Hickle, SBN 24069916

Law Office of Tyler Hickle, PLLC

4005C Banister Lane, Ste. 120C

Austin, TX 78704

Tel: (512) 289-3831 Fax: (512) 870-9505

tyler@hicklepllc.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Tyler Hickle, certify that a copy of this document was served 

on Defendant National Management Recovery Corp.’s attorney via 

email on July 27, 2020.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25899]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. Therm-
O-Rock West, Inc., Civil No. 00-1849 was lodged on September 28, 2000, 
with the United States District Court for District of Arizona.
    The consent decree settles claims for civil penalties and 
injunctive relief against Therm-O-Rock for: civil penalties and 
injunctive relief pursuant to Section 113(b) of the Clean Air Act, 42 
U.S.C. 7413(b), based on Therm-O-Rock's violations of Subparts A and 
UUU of the New Source Performance Standards (``NSPS''), 40 CFR Part 60. 
Pursuant to the consent decree Therm-O-Rock will pay a civil penalty of 
$25,000.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Therm-O-Rock West, Inc., DOJ Ref. #90-5-2-1-2233.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, for the District of Arizona, 230 North First 
Ave Phoenix, AZ 85025; and the Region IX Office of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA. A copy of the 
proposed consent decree may be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, D.C. 20044-7611. In requesting a 
copy please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the 
amount of $3.00 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the 
Consent Decree Library.

Walker B. Smith,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-25899 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
### NUMBER 13
- 16
- 00 313
- CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ LOUIS A. OLIVAREZ , A ppellant ,

v. WEST OSO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 319 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Louis A. Olivarez, proceeding pro se, filed a document entitled “Right of Notice and Appeal” in this Court on June 8, 2016. According to this pleading, the trial court had dismissed his case on February 26, 2013 without providing notice to appellant. Appellant requested this Court to grant reinstatement of the underlying cause. On June2

9, 2016, the Clerk of this Court informed appellant that his pleadin g did not meet the requirements for an original proc eeding and, if the document were construed as a notice of appeal, the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26, 52. Appellant was advised that the matter would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court ’ s directive. On June 28, 2016, appellant filed a response to this Court’s notice asserting that he had not filed any pleadings with this Court and contending that this Court “h as nothing to do with my civil case at this time” and does not “have jurisdiction over this case.” The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s response, and appellant ’ s failure to timely perfect his appeal, is of th e opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(a).

PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 14th day of July , 20 1 6

.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00482-ADA

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., §

EMC CORPORATION

ORDER CANCELLING DISCOVERY DISCOVERY HEARING HEARING BY ZOOM

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case having been set

for DISCOVERY HEARING BY ZOOM on Wednesday,

hereby CANCELLED until further order of the court.

April 13, 2022 at 01:30 PMis

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2022.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 176 Filed 04/12/22 Page 1 of 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5121 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on small particle calcium chloride 

phosphate phosphor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. HUELSKAMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on small particle 

calcium chloride phosphate phosphor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SMALL PARTICLE CALCIUM CHLORIDE PHOS4 PHATE PHOSPHOR. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.74 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 small particle calcium chloride phosphate phosphor) is 

8 amended by striking the date in the effective period col9 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5121 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5433 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5433

 To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital camera lenses 
                 measuring approximately 10 mm or more.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital camera lenses 
                 measuring approximately 10 mm or more.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIGHTWEIGHT DIGITAL CAMERA LENSES MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 10 
              MM OR MORE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Lenses designed     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          for digital                                                       12/31/2014
                          cameras, the
                          foregoing with a
                          focal length
                          measuring
                          approximately 10
                          mm or more but
                          not over 24 mm
                          and weighing
                          between 455 and
                          465 grams
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          9002.11.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 65-1 Filed 11/09/20 Page 1 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 65-1 Filed 11/09/20 Page 2 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 65-1 Filed 11/09/20 Page 3 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 65-1 Filed 11/09/20 Page 4 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 65-1 Filed 11/09/20 Page 5 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 65-1 Filed 11/09/20 Page 6 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 65-1 Filed 11/09/20 Page 7 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 65-1 Filed 11/09/20 Page 8 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 65-1 Filed 11/09/20 Page 9 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 65-1 Filed 11/09/20 Page 10 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 65-1 Filed 11/09/20 Page 11 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 65-1 Filed 11/09/20 Page 12 of 12
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,598  | 2,794  | 891    | 604    | 2,397  | 1,767  | 1,540  | 450    | 1,346  | 437   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 229    | 1,218  | 445    | 953    | 567    | 354    | 1,670  | 4,836  | 880    | 2,461 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4,464  | 2,898  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Zone 4 Play, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 29, 2005

                                                                  /s/ Uri Levy
                                                                  ------------
                                                                  Name: Uri Levy
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: TMC LEGACY TRUST

PETITION OF: LOUIS M. CERTO, M.D. :

:

:

:

: No. 129 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of October, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 31.1
  CERTIFICATION
  I, Robert F. Kirk, certify that:
  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Avistar Communications Corporation;
  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.           The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.           The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  
  
  
 
 Date: November 3, 2009By:
/s/ Robert F. KirkRobert F. KirkChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)