alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               50,571
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       108,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                          5,582
<INVENTORY>                                         101,684
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    355,362
<PP&E>                                            2,608,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,264,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2,018,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               647,481
<BONDS>                                           1,963,152
<COMMON>                                                 41
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (786,356)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2,018,486
<SALES>                                           1,604,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,626,023
<CGS>                                             1,154,633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,154,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    438,288
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   23,899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       9,203
<INCOME-TAX>                                          3,681
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   5,522
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          5,522
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.01
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit (11)

                        STERLING BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended                   Six Months Ended
                                                                 June 30,                           June 30,
                                                         1998               1997             1998               1997
                                                         ----               ----             ----               ----
<S>                                                   <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Net income                                            $3,113,472        $2,633,116        $6,116,437        $5,095,592
Less: preferred dividends                                 12,735             9,579            25,585            19,157
                                                      ----------        ----------        ----------        ----------
NET INCOME AVAILABLE FOR COMMON SHAREHOLDERS           3,100,737         2,623,537         6,090,852         5,076,435
Add: interest on convertible subordinated debt                --            55,639                --           130,629
                                                      ----------        ----------        ----------        ----------
NET INCOME ADJUSTED FOR DILUTED COMPUTATION           $3,100,737        $2,679,176        $6,090,852        $5,207,064
                                                      ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========


WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING             8,279,458         7,791,977         8,253,079         7,758,583
Add dilutive effect of:
      Stock options                                      167,657           117,372           131,626           100,508
      Convertible preferred stock                        244,357           246,963           245,152           247,493
      Convertible subordinated debt                           --           455,500                --           471,268
                                                      ----------        ----------        ----------        ----------
ADJUSTED FOR ASSUMED DILUTED COMPUTATION               8,691,472         8,611,812         8,629,857         8,577,852
                                                      ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE                              $     0.37        $     0.33        $     0.74        $     0.65
                                                      ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARES                           $     0.36        $     0.31        $     0.71        $     0.61
                                                      ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========
</TABLE>

                                       30
Exhibit 10.3


 


FORM OF JOINDER


JOINDER TO

REVENUE LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT


Reference is made to that certain Amended and
Restated Loan Agreement dated as of August 31, 2021 (the “Agreement”), by and between Teal Drones, Inc., a Delaware
corporation and Decathlon Alpha IV, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Lender”). Capitalized terms used but not
defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Agreement, as amended.


This joinder agreement (this “Joinder”),
dated as of August 31, 2021, is delivered by Red Cat Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Red Cat” or “Guarantor”).


By executing and by delivering this Joinder,
as provided in Section 5.8 of the Agreement, each Guarantor hereby becomes a party to the Agreement, as amended from time to time,
in the same manner and with the same force and effect as if such Guarantor were an original signatory to the Agreement as a party thereto
for the following purposes: (i) such Guarantor shall be deemed to be a “Company Entity” for all purposes under the Agreement,
(ii) such Guarantor shall be deemed to have granted a security interest to Lender as contemplated under Section 2.4 of the Agreement
in all of such Guarantor’s Collateral described in Schedule 11.1 of the Agreement, and Lender will be permitted to take such actions
and make such filings as are contemplated in Section 2.4 of the Agreement with respect to such Guarantor for the such Guarantor’s
Collateral; and (iii) such Guarantor acknowledges and agrees that it is subject to and shall comply with all covenants and agreements
applicable to a Company Entity as set forth in the Agreement. such Guarantor hereby further agrees to deliver such other documents that
Lender may reasonably request pursuant to the Agreement.


Each Guarantor hereby represents and warrants
that each of the representations and warranties contained in Section 3.1 of the Agreement applicable to a Company Entity is true
and correct in all material respects on and as of the date hereof as if made on and as of such date.


Signature page follows




    	 



    	 



    

GUARANTOR:


Red
cat holdings, inc.


 


By:________________________

Jeffrey Thompson, CEO
##### 



America First Fresno Apartment Investors, L.P. and Operating
    
    Interstate Limited PartnershipCompany
    
    J.H.C CorpAmerica First PM Group, Inc.
    
    Lakes of Northdale, Ltd.Apollo Associates, Ltd.
    
    Littlestone LLCApollo Associates GP, LLC
    
    Morganton Place Apartments, LLCArbor Knoll-Crest, LLC
    
    Northdale GP Corp.Arbors of Dublin Apartments GP Corp.
    
    Oakhurst Apartments Limited PartnershipArbors of Dublin Apartments Limited Partnership
    
    Oakhurst GP, LLCArizona Coral Point Apartments Limited Partnership
    
    Oakwell Farms Limited PartnershipBelvedere Apartments Limited Partnership
    
    Oyster Cove Limited PartnershipBelvedere GP, LLC
    
    Park at 58 Limited PartnershipBluff Ridge Associates Limited Partnership
    
    Park at 58 Operating CompanyBrentwood Oaks Apartments L.P.
    
    Park Trace Apartments Limited PartnershipBrentwood Oaks Operating Company
    
    Park Trace Operating CompanyCapital Source GP, L.L.C.
    
    Ponds at Georgetown Limited PartnershipCentrum Monticello Limited Partnership
    
    The Park at Countryside Limited PartnershipCoral Point Apartments Operating Company
    
    The Park at Countryside Operating CompanyCSI LLC
    
    The Reserve at Wescott Phase II GP Corp.CS Properties I, Inc.
    
    The Reserve at Wescott GP Corp.CS Properties II, Inc.
    
    The Reserve at Wescott L.P.Cumberland Trace Apartments, LLC
    
    The Reserve at Wescott Phase II L.P.Cypress Landings II, Ltd.
    
    Tregaron Oaks Apartments, L.P.Delta Crossing Limited Partnership
    
    Tregaron Oaks GP Corp.EC Apartments Limited Partnership and Operating Company
    
    Tulsa-Greenbriar Apartments, Inc.Fox Hollow, Ltd.
    
    Village at Cliffdale Apartments, LLCGreenbriar-Hunt Holding Corp.
    
    Waters Edge Limited PartnershipGreenhouse Holding LLC
    
    Woodberry Asheville Apartments, LLCHunt Apartments Inc.
    
    WCH Services LLCHunts View Apartments Limited Partnership
 75
Exhibit 99.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

     I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, Motorola Debenture-Backed Series 2002-12 Trust (the "Trust"),
certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
         Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
         servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in
         respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report
         of the Trust;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
         omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
         in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
         not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
         annual report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
         provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
         under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in
         such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

     4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
         based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
         Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.



Date: March 29, 2004


       /s/ David J. Kolibachuk
-----------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President



                                      8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

EL PASO DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

V. No. EP-20-CR-00582-DCG 

MARIA LUISA CUELLAR SANTILLAN 

WAIVER OF RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY . 

The undersigned hereby waive the right to a trial by jury in this cause and hereby 

agree that all matters of fact, as well as oflaw, be determined by the Court. 

By: 

Date: 

ni 

\ \_ ~AJ J ct t A ;,ADco t ~ It t 0~ ! o-+! 

ARIA LUISA CUELLAR SANTILLAN 

✓ Mary Stilli er 

Attorney for the Defendant 

Agreed: 

United States Attorney 

#7=& 

THE COURT APPROVES THE FOREGOING. 

DAVID C. GUADERRAMA 

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

March 16, 2022

Case 3:20-cr-00582-DCG Document 77 Filed 03/16/22 Page 1 of 1
AO 442 (REV. 12/85)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, DEL RIO DIVISION

United States of America

vs.

(1) Jonathan Rivera-Bravo

§

§

§

§

§

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

CASE NUMBER: DR:20-M -00711(1)

 I, the undersigned complainant being duly sworn state the following is true and correct to the best

of my knowledge and belief. On or about February 28, 2020 in Maverick county, in the WESTERN

DISTRICT OF TEXAS defendant(s) did, Jonathan RIVERA-Bravo, an alien, entered, or was found in the

United States at or near Eagle Pass, Texas, after having been denied admission, excluded, deported, or

removed from the United States through Hidalgo, Tx on 12/29/2019, and not having obtained the express

consent of the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security or the Attorney General of the United

States to reapply for admission thereto. Defendant being voluntarily in the United States unlawfully , a

felony,

in violation of Title 8 United States Code, Section(s) 1326(a)(1)

.

 I further state that I am a(n) Border Patrol Agent and that this complaint is based on the

following facts: "The defendant, Jonathan RIVERA-Bravo, was arrested by Border Patrol Agents, on February

28, 2020 for being an alien illegally present in the United States. Investigation and records of

Continued on the attached sheet and made a part of hereof.

Sworn to before me and subscribed in my presence,

Signature of Complainant

Labori, Luismiguel

Border Patrol Agent

03/03/2020 at DEL RIO, Texas

File Date City and State

VICTOR ROBERTO GARCIA ______________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Signature of Judicial Officer

Case 2:20-cr-00708-AM Document 1 Filed 03/03/20 Page 1 of 2
CONTINUATION OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case Number: DR:20-M -00711(1)

(1) Jonathan Rivera-Bravo

Continuation of Statement of Facts:

the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services reveal the defendant was previously deported from the United

States on 12/29/2019 through Hidalgo, Tx. The defendant was found in the Western District of Texas without

having obtained permission from the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General of the United States

to re-apply for admission after being deported. The defendant is unlawfully present in the United States.

"

______________________________

Signature of Judicial Officer Signature of Complainant

Case 2:20-cr-00708-AM Document 1 Filed 03/03/20 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
             -------------------------------------------------------

                         CHASE CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST
             (formerly known as Chemical Master Credit Card Trust I)

             -------------------------------------------------------

         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of JPMorgan Chase
Bank (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), a banking corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York ("JPMCB"), as
Servicer pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated as of November 15, 1999 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement")
by and among JPMCB, Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, National Association and The Bank
of New York, as trustee (the "Trustee") does hereby certify that:

         1.       JPMCB is the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing
                  Agreement.

         2.       The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Pooling and
                  Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to
                  the Trustee.

         3.       This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.5 of the
                  Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

         4.       A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar
                  year ended December 31, 2003 was conducted under the
                  supervision of the undersigned.

         5.       Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of the
                  knowledge of the undersigned, fully performed all its
                  obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
                  throughout such period and no default in the performance of
                  such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set
                  forth in paragraph 6 below.

         6.       The following is a description of each default in the
                  performance of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions
                  of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, including any
                  Supplement, known to the undersigned to have been made during
                  such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each
                  such default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any,
                  to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status of
                  each such default: NONE


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 30th day of March, 2004.

                                         JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,
                                         as Servicer,


                                         By: /s/ Miriam K. Haimes
                                             -----------------------------------
                                         Name:  Miriam K. Haimes
                                         Title: Senior Vice President
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Saro Mogavero, Defendant.

Court of General Sessions of County of New York,

November 27, 1957.

*Matthew H. Brandenburg*for defendant.

*Frank 8. Hogan, District Attorney (Bernard*L. *Friedman*of counsel), for plaintiff.

Thomas Dickens, J.

This motion for *coram nobis*relief is denied.

*198The minutes of what took place at the sentencing of defendant on December 14, 1953, refute defendant’s belated claim asserted in Ms affidavit.

TMs refutation is materially enhanced in forcefulness by the following papers on file in the clerk’s office: Three letters, dated June 26, 1955, August 22, 1955 and August 29, 1955, respectively, two addressed by defendant to the sentencing Judge and one to the clerk; motion papers, dated August 22, 1955, for an inspection of the Grand Jury minutes; defendant’s affidavit thereon in reply to that from the District Attorney’s office; and the opimon of the sentencing Judge who, incidentally, heard and thereafter denied that motion. In not any one of these documents does a single word appear indicating any promise or agreement by either the sentencing Judge or the District Attorney of a specified sentence as a compromise for defendant’s plea of guilty during trial. And all these documents came about after defendant’s sentence on December 14, 1953.

Moreover, the affidavit of defendant lacks any indication that the essential assertions therein emanate from personal knowledge, let alone the absence of an appropriate affidavit to lend corroborative support to these assertions or to bolster their legal effect.

It follows, therefrom, that when these documents on file are aligned against defendant’s bare affidavit, they conclusively destroy the efficacy of Ms claim of a promise, and therefore, a hearing is not warranted. (See Frank on Coram Nobis [1957 Supp., p. 23, n. 6, 8; p. 14, n. 72] and cf. *People*v. *King,*thereunder.)

The District Attorney is directed to enter an order in conformance with the decision herein and to forward a certified copy to defendant and his attorney.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL

INC., EMC CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00477-ADA

 Defendant

ORDER CANCELLING MOTION HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case having been

set for MOTION HEARING, on August 11, 2022 at 02:00 PM is hereby CANCELLED as it was

erroneously filed in this case and should have been set in the companion case of WA:20-CV-473.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of August, 2022.

______________________________

DEREK T. GILLILAND

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA-DTG Document 225 Filed 08/11/22 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40848 Conference Calendar

DARRYL LAMAR REED, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus MICHAEL PURDY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-01-CV-264

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Darryl Lamar Reed (“Reed”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Reed asserts that because the jury was not required to find the drug quantity beyond a reasonable doubt, his conviction and sentence are invalid under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review, and an Apprendi violation does notNo. 02-40848 -2- establish that a petitioner was convicted of a nonexistent offense. Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont, TX , 305 F.3d 343, 347 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied , 123 S. Ct. 1374 (2003).
AFFIRMED.
Request for Information FAA-2014-0397 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Anderson: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition for amendment 

dated June 23, 2016 (Docket No. FAA-2014-0397). This information is necessary for the Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

z A detailed description of the Yamaha FAZER UAS helicopter design and configuration focusing 

on the UAS features and flight characteristics to include, but not limited to:

{ Operational limitations, restrictions, and warnings (spray and non-spray use)

{ Operational history with supporting statistics; particularly where Yamaha Motor 

Corporation was the principal operator, or retained direct oversight

{ Results of analysis and flight testing of UAS, especially results that form the basis of the 

UAS operational envelope analysis 

{ Log of repairs and alterations performed during operations to include design changes and 

fixes due to operational failure(s) (lessons learned)

{ Details of any injuries or property damage encountered during flight or ground operations

{ Details of any failure modes such as lost link, fly-away, loss of control, and etc.

z Copies of company manuals, photographs, videos/telemetry may be provided as support

z Any other information to support operational safety with UAS in excess of 55 pounds.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov.

Once your information is submitted, please save your tracking number and submit your tracking number 

along with the information submitted to the docket, and any proprietary information electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive 

the information described above by 11/21/16. If we do not receive the information, we will close the 

docket without notifying you further.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 10:15 AM 

To: brad_ [anderson@yamaha-motor.com]

Request for Information FAA-2014-0397 Page 1 of 1

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note... 11/7/2016