alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5616 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5616

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain turn or turned 
      footwear with outer soles of leather and uppers of leather.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

 Ms. Jenkins introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain turn or turned 
      footwear with outer soles of leather and uppers of leather.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TURN OR TURNED FOOTWEAR WITH OUTER SOLES OF LEATHER 
              AND UPPERS OF LEATHER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.48 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain turn or turned 
footwear with outer soles of leather and uppers of leather) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### 32nd Street Delicatessen, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*Culinary Workers Union of New York, Local No. 923, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

November 15, 1957.

*Maxwell E. Blinder*for plaintiff;

*Katz <& Wolchok*for defendants.

Irving H. Saypol, J.

The action is against an unincorporated association, its proper officers are designated in the caption (General Associations Law, § 13) and the complaint has survived the defendants’ attack under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that required allegations of adoption and ratification by the' membership were lacking (N. Y. L. J., Nov. 1, 1957, p. 6, col. 8).

The jurisdiction of the subject matter is now attacked because service was made on a person other than either of the named and authorized officers. After the service of the summons and complaint, the plaintiff’s application for a temporary injunction was unsuccessfully opposed by the defendants appearing generally through their present counsel (N. Y. L. J., Oct, 24, 1957, p. 6, col. 2). As has been stated, the same lawyers for the same clients had moved against the complaint.

The prior conduct of the defendants in opposing the application for a temporary injunction — meeting the general issue on *70the merits, and their attack on the complaint on a point of law, constituted a voluntary general appearance, the equivalent to personal service of the summons (Civ. Prac. Act, § 237). By analogy the defendants under authority of section 12 of the General Associations Law could maintain a jural relationship as plaintiff *(Westcott*v. *Fargo,*61 N. Y. 542). There is established precedent to support the conclusion that the defendants could voluntarily waive the defect in service by making a general appearance *(Schivera*v. *Long Is. Light. Co.,*61 N. Y. S. 2d 430, revd. on other grounds 270 App. Div. 852, affd. 296 N. Y. 26; *Mack*v. *American Express Co.,*20 Misc. 215). The Court of Appeals has held that failure to designate the officer in his proper capacity is a corrective irregularity *(Matter of Motor Haulage Co. [Teamsters’ Union],*298 N. Y. 208). That being so, and if the amorphous aggregation *(Martin*v. *Curran,*303 N. Y. 276, 280) without existence, independent of its individual membership, nevertheless can sue under section 12 of the General Associations Law through its designated officers, it seems logical that by defending through them on the merits it must be held capable of waiving the prior defect in service.

The defendants’ citation and quotation from the opinion of Rabin, J., in *Caines*v. *Prudential Ins. Co.*(8 Misc 2d 789) seems to ignore the opening statement in the opinion where Judge Rabin said that the defendant was appearing specially to attack the complaint for legal insufficiency. It is clear that the latter case involved no question of the effect of any prior general appearance.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of China Runji Cement Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xiangfei Zeng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented.








Date: December 14, 2010
By: /s/Xiangfei Zeng

Xiangfei Zeng

Chief Financial Officer
#### Krause & Krause et al., Appellants, v Marcia L. Gelman et al., Respondents. Marcia L. Gelman, Plaintiff, v Scott Levy et al., Defendants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Edwards, Jr., J.), entered on February 7, 1990, which, *inter alia,*dismissed the ninth, eleventh, thirteenth, fifteenth, seventeenth, twentieth, twenty-second and twenty-third causes of action of plaintiffs’ amended verified complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This dispute involves a small law firm and one of its former associates. Those causes of action sounding in fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress, abuse of process, prima facie tort and tortious interference were dismissed by the IAS court. We agree.

The cause of action for fraud fails to detail the facts and circumstances of the alleged fraud with respect to the misrepresentations alleged to have been made by the defendant *(see, Mance v Mance,*128 AD2d 448, 449, *lv dismissed*70 NY2d 668) and represents an attempt to sue for fraud based upon a breach of contract *(Metropolitan Transp. Auth. v Triumph Adv. Prods.,*116 AD2d 526, 527).

*300A breach of contract may sustain a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress only in certain narrow circumstances *(see, Hoheb v Pathology Assocs.,*146 AD2d 919) which are not pleaded here and it cannot be said that the conduct alleged exceeds all reasonable bounds of decency *(James v Saltsman,*99 AD2d 797, 798). Likewise, the claim of abuse of process is without foundation. The service of a summons and complaint or a counterclaim is not "process” susceptible of tortious abuse, even if maliciously motivated *(see, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan v Beltramini,*157 AD2d 590, 591).

Plaintiffs’ conclusory allegations do not satisfy the pleading requirement of specificity as to special damages *(Freihofer v Hearst Corp.,*65 NY2d 135, 143) or evince a disinterested malevolence *(Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v Lindner,*59 NY2d 314, 333). Nor is there any allegation that any third party was directly induced to breach their contract with the plaintiffs by the defendant so as to support a claim of tortious interference *(see, Novak v Rubin,*129 AD2d 780, 782). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 3.4
                                                 PITTWAY CORPORATION
                                                       JUNE 30, 1998

                                                           FORM 10-Q


                      CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                TO
               RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                              ********

    In accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General
              Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

                              ********

     Pittway Corporation, a corporation duly organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST:    That the Board of Directors of said corporation, on 
March 12, 1996, at a meeting duly called and constituted, adopted 
the following resolutions proposing an amendment to the Company's 
Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the shares of 
capital stock which the Corporation has authority to issue and 
directing that such amendment be submitted to the stockholders for 
consideration at said corporation's 1996 annual meeting:

               RESOLVED, that in the opinion of the Board of 
     Directors it is advisable that the Restated Certificate of 
     Incorporation, as amended, of Pittway Corporation be 
     further amended as follows:

               The first sentence of Article FOURTH shall be
     amended in its entirety to read as follows:

                    The total number of shares of all classes 
     of capital stock which the Corporation shall have 
     authority to issue is Eighty Million (80,000,000) shares,
     of which Two Million (2,000,000) shares shall be 
     designated Preferred Stock with no par value, Thirty-Six 
     Million (36,000,000) shares shall be designated Class A 
     Stock of the par value of $1.00 per share, and Forty-Two 
     Million (42,000,000) shares shall be designated Common 
     Stock of the par value of $1.00 per share.

               FURTHER RESOLVED, that such amendment be 
     submitted to the stockholders of Pittway Corporation for 
     consideration at Pittway Corporation's 1996 annual meeting 
     of stockholders.

     SECOND:   That at the annual meeting of stockholders of said 
corporation held May 9, 1996, the aforesaid amendment was approved 
by vote of a majority of each of: (i) the votes which the 
outstanding Common Stock and Class A Stock were entitled to cast at 
such annual meeting, (ii) the outstanding Common Stock, voting as a 
class, and (iii) the outstanding Class A Stock, voting as a class.

     THIRD:    That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in 
accordance with the applicable provisions of section 242 of the 
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Pittway Corporation has caused this 
certificate to be signed by King Harris, its President, this 9th day 
of May, 1996.

                                          Pittway Corporation

                                          By:___________________
                                          King Harris, President
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant
    to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b)
    of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant
    to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b)
    of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
    officer of Sterling Bancorp, a New York corporation (the Company),
    hereby certifies that: The
    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2007 (the
    Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:
August 9, 2007
/s/ Louis J.
  CappelliName:
Louis J.
  CappelliTitle:
Chairman and
  Chief Executive Officer The
    foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
    of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
    Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part
    of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 45
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siboney Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Timothy J. Tegeler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                   /s/ Timothy J. Tegeler
                                   ---------------------------------
                                   Timothy J. Tegeler
                                   Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                   Financial Officer




November 12, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6876-8]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C., App. 2) notification is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development (ORD), Board of Scientific Counselors (BOSC), will hold an Executive Committee Meeting.

# DATES:

The Meeting will be held on October 16-17, 2000. On Monday, October 16, the meeting will begin at 9 a.m., and will recess at 4:30 p.m. On Tuesday, October 17, the meeting will reconvene at 9 a.m. and will adjourn at approximately 4 p.m. All times noted are Eastern Time.

# ADDRESSES:

The Meeting will be held at the Loews L'Enfant Plaze Hotel, 480 L'Enfant Plaza Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20024 (202) 484-1000.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Agenda items will include, but not be limited to: Discussion of BOSC Subcommittee Draft Reports on ORD's Particular Matter 2.5                     Research Program, Welcome of new Executive Committee Members, and ORD SP2K Consultation.                

Anyone desiring a draft agenda may fax their request to Shirley R. Hamilton (202) 565-2444. The meeting is open to the public. Any member of the public wishing to make a presentation at the meeting should contact Shirley Hamilton, Designated Federal Officer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Board of Scientific Counselors, Office of Research and Development (8701R), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; or by telephone at (202) 564-6853. In general, each individual making an oral presentation will be limited to a total of three minutes.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Shirley R. Hamilton, Designated Federal Officer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development (8701R), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; (202) 564-6853.

Dated: September 19, 2000.

Peter W. Preuss,

Director, National Center for Environmental Research.

[FR Doc. 00-24670 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
#### BAKER v. STATE.

No. 26885.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 10, 1954.

Joe H. Jones, Dallas, for appellant.

Leighton Cornett, County Atty., Paris, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. ' •

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for possession of whis-ky in a dry .area for the .purpose of sale, the punishment assessed by the jury being six months'in jail and a fine-of . $750. .

In view of our disposition' of the appeal, a statement of the facts is deemed unnecessary. .

The information, purporting to rest upon the written affidavit of C. O. Shelton, was filed on September 29, 1953.

The complaint or affidavit of C. O. Shelton which appears in the transcript was sworn to and filed on September 30, 1953. It therefore was not in existence when the information was presented on September 29, 1953.

Art. 415, C.C.P. provides, in part:

> “No information shall be presented until affidavit has been made by some credible person charging the defendant with an offense. The affidavit shall be filed with the information.”'

The information must be preceded by, or accompanied by, a valid complaint. Branch’s Ann.P.C. p. 247, Sec. 476.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|New York Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|New York Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5      | 2      | 12     | 32    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 43     | 60     | 29     | 50     | 26     | 26     | 38     | 49     | 55     | 19    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 15     | 2      | 6      | 1      | 1      | 3      | 6      | 8      | W      | 9     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                              
|No chart available.                                                                              
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Illinois Nonassociated Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
From: Spurling, Rebecca [Rebecca.A.Spurling@tsocorp.com]

Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:41 PM

To: Body, Steve; Rose, Keith

Subject: Tesoro BART Modeling Protocol v2 (3-28-13)

Attachments: v2 BART Modeling Protocol (3-28-13).docx

Updated

Page 1 of 1

file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/Documentum/CTS/docbases/ProDocbase/config/temp_sessions/272538133... 6/16/2014