alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM    We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries for the period ended July 2, 2006, as indicated in our report dated July 26, 2006; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements File No.'s 333-02683, 333-05231, 333-15851, 333-43055, 333-51189, 333-51181, 333-57779, 333-84483 and 333-86492.  We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.     /S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP    Dayton, Ohio August 1, 2006
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 12.1

                         WESTERN UNITED HOLDING COMPANY
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

     The ratio of adjusted earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock
dividends was computed using the following tabulations to compute adjusted
earnings and the defined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends.

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                      (Dollars in
                                                                       Thousands)
                                        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Year ended September 30
                                        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            2002           2001           2000           1999           1998
<S>                                       <C>            <C>           <C>             <C>            <C>
Net income                                $27,937        $12,421       $1,372         $ 11,128       $ 3,753
Add:
  Interest                                  1,293          1,169         1,617            2,692         4,449
  Interest credited to policyholders       53,132         47,473        46,123           43,495        46,267
  Taxes (benefit) on income                16,522         (8,412)        2,357          (10,684)        1,943
                                          -------        -------       -------         --------       -------
Adjusted earnings                         $98,884        $52,651       $51,469         $ 46,631       $56,412
                                          =======        =======       =======         ========       =======
Fixed charges
  Interest                                  1,293          1,169         1,617            2,692         4,449
  Interest credited to policyholders       53,132         47,473        46,123           43,495        46,267
    Capitalized interest                    1,226            606           660              535           223
                                          -------        -------       -------         --------       -------
Total fixed charges                       $55,651        $49,248       $48,400         $ 46,722       $50,939
                                          =======        =======       =======         ========       =======
Ratio of adjusted earnings
to fixed charges                             1.78          1.07           1.06             *             1.11
</Table>
--------
* Earnings were insufficient to meet fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
  by approximately $0.1 million for the year ended September 30, 1999.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Movie Star,  Inc.(the  "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  each  of  the  undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1. the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Dated: November 12, 2003              /s/ Melvyn Knigin
                                      ----------------------
                                      Name:  Melvyn Knigin
                                      Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 12, 2003              /s/ Thomas Rende
                                      -----------------------
                                      Name:  Thomas Rende
                                      Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal
                                             Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>


                                                                       EXHIBIT 8


            LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF VIATEL HOLDING (BERMUDA) LIMITED



     - VTL-TP (Bermuda) Limited (Bermuda)
     - Viatel Belgium NV (Belgium)
     - Viatel Operations SA (France)
     - VTL, Inc. (U.S.)

          O Viatel Finance Company LLC (Delaware, U.S.)
          O Viatel Belgium Limited
          O Investeringsmaatschappij Westkappelle BV (The Netherlands)
          O Viatel Circe Asset Limited
          O Viatel s.r.l (Italy)
          O VTL (UK) Limited (UK)

               - Viatel Internet Limited (UK)

          O Viatel Global Communications S.p.A (Italy)

               - Viatel Communications GmbH (Germany)

          O Viatel GmbH (Germany)
          O Viatel Holding (Luxembourg) SARL (Luxembourg)
          O Viatel German Holding GmbH (Germany)

               - Viatel Global Communications GmbH (Germany)

          O Viatel U.K. Limited (UK)
          O Viatel SA (France)
          O VPN SARL (France)

     - Viatel Holding (Europe) Limited (UK)

          O Viatel Equipment Limited (UK)
          O Viatel Global Communications BV (The Netherlands)

               - Viafoperations Communications BV
                    - Accountants en Belastingadviesbureau Strijk BV

          O Viaphone AG
          O Cybernet (Schweiz) AG
          O VTL Telecom GmbH (Germany)
          O Viatel German Asset GmbH (Germany)

               - ViCaMe Infrastructure Development GmbH (Germany)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC.,

EMC CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00473-ADA

ORDER SETTING HEARING ON MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

MOTION HEARING by Zoom on Monday, February 14, 2022 at 10:30 AM. This hearing is

for all cases listed in bold font on the underlying motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of February, 2022.

______________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 154 Filed 02/09/22 Page 1 of 1
#### Garesché, *Appellant,*v. Lewis, *Administrator.*

1. Administration: limitations : exhibition op demands. Under the statute, unmatured demands running to certain maturity are barred, unless they are exhibited to the administrator within two years after the publication of notice of the grant of letters,

3. -: corporations : stockholders. The claim of a creditor ' of a corporation against a stockholder for unpaid stock matures on dissolution of the corporation, and must be exhibited within two years.

8. --: -:--. The liability of a stockholder to a creditor of the corporation for unpaid stock becomes fixed by the insolvency and dissolution of the corporation, and then becomes a primary liability.*

*Appeal from St. Lords Court of Appeals.*

ÁEEIBMED.

*Smith & Harrison*and *A. B. Taylor*for appellant.

*G. A. Finkelnburg*and *G. L>. Bantz*for respondent.

*

 These syllabi are taken from 15 Mo. App. 565.

Brace, J.

This case is before us on appeal from the judgment of the St. Louis Court of Appeals, affirming *198the judgment *of the*St. Louis circuit court, and, after a careful consideration of the views urged by counsel for appellant, we are of opinion that tbe doctrine asserted by the court of appeals is correct, and tbe judgment of said court is affirmed on tbe grounds and for tbe reasons stated in tbe opinion of said court. *15*Mo. App. 565.

All concur, except Judge Sherwood, not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5640 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5640

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pyridaben Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2012

  Mr. Gosar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pyridaben Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PYRIDABEN TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Pyridaben Technical) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 15



November 10, 2000


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, Northwest
Washington, D.C.  20549
Attention:  Document Control

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated October 26, 2000, on our review of
the condensed consolidated interim financial information of 7-Eleven,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of and for the period ended
September 30, 2000, and included in the Company's quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended, is incorporated by reference in
the following Registration Statements:


                                                   REGISTRATION NO.
                                                   ----------------
       On Form S-8 for:

       7-Eleven, Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan        33-63617

       7-Eleven, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement
         Plan for Eligible Employees                  333-42731

       7-Eleven, Inc. Stock Compensation Plan for
         Non-Employee Directors                       333-68491



Very truly yours,

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Dallas, Texas





                                  Tab 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5500 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on Methylionone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. SCHMIDT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 

Methylionone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METHYLIONONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.10 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Methylionone) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘0.6%’’ and inserting ‘‘1.1%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

10 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5500 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 3.3





CERTIFICATE
OF CORRECTION


TO
THE


CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT


TO
THE


CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION


OF


HAWK
SYSTEMS, INC.






——————————————




March 17,
2010


——————————————




Hawk
Systems, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), does hereby
certify as follows:




1.           The
name of the Corporation is Hawk Systems, Inc.




2.           That
a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation was filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on January 2,
2009 (the “Certificate”)
and that the Certificate requires correction as permitted by Section 103 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.




3.           The
inaccuracy or defect of the Certificate is that the Certificate was erroneously
filed and is to be declared null and void. The amendment described in the
Certificate was not intended to be effective on January 9, 2009.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Corporation has caused this Certificate of Correction to the Certificate of
Amendment to be executed as of the date first above written.





HAWK
      SYSTEMS, INC.By:
            /s/
      Michael DiamantName:  Michael
      DiamantTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA), INC.,

ZTE (TX), INC.

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00488-ADA

ORDER SETTING MOTION HEARING HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

MOTION HEARING by Zoomoom on Friday, July 16, 2021 at 11:00 AM.

set

IT 15th day of July, 2021.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and to which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Robert E. Lowder, the
principal executive officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 8, 2006



/s/    ROBERT E. LOWDERRobert E. LowderChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and will be retained by The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
R-141 

~~ATTORNEY GENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

4pril 15, 1947 

Honorable Sam Sellera, 

Penitentiary Committee, 

House of Representatives, 

Austin, Texas 

opinion No, v-142 

Be: Validity ai House 

Bill Ne, 215 authorizing the Priaon 

3yatemtp bid on 

contract e for priatim&, binding stationexy and eupplies of 

like oharaoter with 

: the Board 0r Control. 

You have requested an opinion from this orrice as to the ralldity or Heuse Bilk No, 215. 

Ganerally, the bill meets the constitutional 

requirements ot being limited to one subject which is 

expressed in its title, and of being sufrioiently certain 

and definite it ita terms. 

SpeoifiCally, Article XVI, Seotion 21 Of the 

Constitution of Texas directs that all printing and binding used by the various departments of the State "shall 

be perforined under contract to be given to the lowest re- 

,sponsible bidder, o L o under suOh reguJ,at$.eaes shal.J 

be prescribed by lawp* The constitutional provisionvery 

clearly leaves it to the Legislature to prescribe who may 

be *the lowest responsible bidder" within the aonetitutlonal requlremento At present, Article 608, R.C.S. preecribes,the methods to be used in the award of this type 

of+ aontract, and defines *the lowest responsible bidilsr* 

aa used in the Constitution as 

corporations or associatioas*n 

"responsible peraens,rirma, 

House Bill 215 is assigned 

to tinlarge this derinition to iacluds the State Prima 

Board and, beoause such Beard 48 an agency of the State, 

very properly exempts it rrom the present requirement or 

.Article 608 that bidders bn these oontraets shall make 

bzuldc .',. 

It is the opinion or this office that there 

is no specific legal objection to the Legislature autherizing the Prison Bear& to bid on printing contracts with 
Honorable Sara Sellem - Page 2 

the Board or Control as provided by the House Bill presented. Accordingly, you are advised that House Bill No. 

215 would be valid if enacted. 

There is no legal objeotion to House 

Bill No. 215, which authorizes the Prison 

Board to bid on contracts ror State printing ana supplies. The bill would be valid 

if enacteb. 

Tours very truly, 

ATTORNEY GhmRAL ,OF TEXAS 

JL:wb 

APPROVED APRIL 15, 1947 

ZL Qhi!d 

ATTORN2X GF3ERA.L OF TFXAS
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-15 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 
**- 6494** 

LARRY LYLE LASKO ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; MR. J. CARAWAY, Warden, is sued in his Individual and Official Capacities; MR. D. CARPENDER, Captain, is sued in his Individual and Official Capacities; MR. BRIGHT, Special Investigative Agent, (SIA) is sued in his Individual and Official Capacities; MR. K. LILLER, Senior Officer, is sued in his Individual and Official Capacities; WITH OTHER MR. AND MS. JANE AND JOHN DOES, as named in the Previously filed TORT Action Exhibited. Is sued in Their Individual and Official Capacities for Unveiling Professional Norms ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Alexander Williams, Jr

. , District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv
- 00597

- AW )

Submitted : June 6, 2013 Decided: June 18, 2013

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Larry Lyle Lasko, Appellant Pro Se.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Larry Lyle Lasko appeals the district court ’ s order
dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

(200 6 ) . We have re viewed the r ecord and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Lasko v. United States , No. 8:13

- cv
- 00597

-
AW (D. Md. Mar. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# FILED
February 17, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk 

### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF T ENNESSEE

AT JA CKSON STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) FOR PUBLICATION ) Filed: February

17, 1998 Appellee, ) ) DYER CRIMINAL v. ) ) Hon. Joe G. Riley, GLENN BERNARD MANN, ) Judge ) Appellant, ) Supreme Court ) No. 02-S01-9609-CC-00077
ORD ER O N PE TIT ION TO RE HEAR A petition for rehearing has been filed on behalf of app ellant, Glenn Bernard Mann in which he requests the opportunity to rebrief and reargue the issue that his sentence is disproportionat e under this Court’s rec ent decision in State v. Bland , __ S.W.2d __ (Tenn. 1997). He asserts that “the failure to allow him the ben efit of the new Bland procedures . . . would violate the Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and Article I, Section 8 of the Tennessee Constitution.”
We disagree. The opinion in Bland plainly states that the enumerated factors had been drawn from “a r eview of the comparativ e proportionality discussions contained in our prior decisions.” Ther efore, the procedures are not “new.”

An amicus curiae brief on comparative propor tionality review

has been submitted by Professor Dw ight Aarons, of the Univ ersity of Tennessee College of La w a nd Pr of es so r M ic ha el Bl an ke ns hi p, of East Te nn es se e S ta

te Un iv er si ty . We note that the brief was due before the decisions in Bland and Mann were released, but it was not filed until after their relea se. The amicus curiae submits that the pool of similar cases should include all first degree murder cases. In addition, they argue that some of the factors enumerated in the Bland decision do not aid the analysis, and others are irrelevant to the proportionality q uestion. A majority of this Court ag reed upon the analysis set forth in Bland . Though theCourt did not have the benefit of the amicus curiae brief, the decision in Bland addressed the issues raise d therein. The members of the Court c ontinue to adhere to their respectiv e opinions in Bland

.
Accordingly, a major

ity of this Court had deter mined that the petition to rehear should be denied. Justi ce Reid would grant the petition to rehear and utilize some of the material in the amicus curiae brief to refine the procedures announced in Bland

. For the foregoing reasons , the petition to rehear is denied.

FOR THE COU RT:

_____________________________________

Frank F. Drowota, II I, Justice

Concur: Anderson, C. J. Birch, Holder, JJ. Reid, J. - Dissents from the denial of the petition to rehear.