alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3.1

                            Certificate of Amendment

              CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                         FOR NEVADA PROFIT CORPORATIONS
          (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)

1. Name of Corporation:
   Old Goat Enterprises, Inc.

2. The articles have been amended as follows:

ARTICLE I
NAME AND PURPOSE

     The name of the Corporation, hereinafter called the "Corporation" is:

"Zone 4 Play, Inc."

3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the Corporation
entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote
by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of
incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: 33,270,000 of 35,500,000
issued and outstanding (93.7%).

4. Effective date of filing (optional): Upon Filing

5. Officer Signature (required):  /s/ Shimon Citron
                                  ------------------
                                  Shimon Citron, its CEO and President

Filed February __, 2004
In the Office of Dean Heller
Secretary of State

<PAGE>

                            Articles of Incorporation
                              (PURSUANT TO NRS 78)

Name of Corporation:             Old Goat Enterprises, Inc.

Resident Agency Name             CSC Services of Nevada, Inc.
And Street Address:              502 East John Street
                                 Carson City, Nevada  89705

Shares:                          Number of Shares  75,000,000
                                 Par value .001

Name, Addresses, Number of       Dennis Cox
Board of Directors/Trustee:      4525 Neville Street
                                 Burnaby, BC  Canada  VSJ2G8


Names, Addresses and Signatures  CSC Services of Nevada, Inc.
Of incorporations:               52 East John Street
                                 Carson City, NV  89706
                                 /s/ CSC Services of Nevada

Certificate of Acceptance of     I, CSC Services of Nevada, Inc.
                                 hereby appointment as
Appointment of Resident Agent:   Resident Agent for the above named corporation.

/s/ CSC Services of Nevada       Date: 4/22/2002
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4282

_____________________________

BRYAN LOWTHER and KELSEY 

LOWTHER,

Appellants,

v.

TIMOTHY D. LUCEY and KRISTINA 

M. LUCEY,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Steven M. Fahlgren, Judge.

August 13, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Christopher M. Costello of Brannon Brown Haley & Bullock, P.A., 

Lake City, for Appellants.

J. Thomas McKeel of J. Thomas McKeel, P.A., Fernandina Beach, 

for Appellees.
**Exhibit 31.2**
CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Ann K. Marshall, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Community Financial Holding Company,Inc. (the “small business issuer”);
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;
4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
               5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thesmall business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.
Dated this 24th day of March, 2005.     /s/ Ann K. Marshall Ann K. Marshall, Chief Financial Officer
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|New Mexico - East Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|New Mexico - East Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 748   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 891    | 921    | 1,029  | 1,215  | 1,466  | 1,497  | 1,579  | 2,584  | 3,349  | 3,577 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,420  | 4,812  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### CITIZENS FIDELITY BANK & TRUST CO. v. NORFLEET.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 24, 1952.

Smith & Blackburn, Ben D. Smith, Somerset, for appellant.

Russell Jones, Fritz Krueger, Somerset, for appellee.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

This is a declaratory judgment proceeding between a lessor and an assignee of the original lessee concerning the assignee’s right to sublease a part of the premises. The appeal is from a judgment upholding the assignee’s right to sublease.

In January, 1946, Mr. and Mrs. Beecher Smith executed a lease on a store building in Somerset to Butler Brothers. The lease runs to the last of February, 1957, and provides for a rental of $250 per month. In May, 1948, Butler Brothers assigned the lease to the appellee, J. E. Norfleet. The Smiths gave written consent to the assignment. In a short time Norfleet subleased the second floor of the building to the Commonwealth of Kentucky for office purposes. Approximately two years later the Smiths, through the Citizens Fidelity Bank & Trust Company as committee for Beecher Smith, notified Norfleet that he must either vacate the premises or pay a monthly rental of $500.

The original lease restricted the use of the premises to mercantile purposes and gave only Butler Brothers the right to sublease. Obviously, Norfleet had no right, under the original lease, to sublease a part of the premises. Norfleet contends, however, that, since the Smiths had knowledge of his sublease and accepted rentals from-him for nearly two years after it was made, they are estopped from enforcing the provision of the original lease against subleasing. An examination of the record, shows that the Smiths did have knowledge of Norfleet’s subleasing the second floor.. As we have noted, they continued to accept the rentals for approximately two- years.

The subleasing of the second floor of the building did not automatically terminate the lease, but rather it constituted a ground of forfeiture at the option of the-Smiths. As said in Cities Service Oil Co. v. Taylor, 242 Ky. 157, 45 S.W.2d 1039, 79 A.. *55L.R. 1374, such a ground of forfeiture is waived by the acceptance of rental from the assignee, with knowledge of the assignment, unless circumstances are shown to rebut the presumption arising from such a situation.

Under the circumstances, we think the judgment should be and it is affirmed.
Exhibit 10.7

|LOGO |  | S.I. HOLDINGS LIMITED
|---- |  | ---------------------

P.O. Box
HM 1179
Cedar House
41 Cedar Avenue
Hamilton HM 12
Bermuda

Tel.
(441) 295-2244
Fax. (441) 292-8666

October 31
2003

PERSONAL
AND CONFIDENTIAL

Dr. Michael
W.J. Smurfit
Le Florestan
35 Blvd du Larvotte
Monaco

Dear
Dr. Smurfit:

On
behalf of S.I. Holdings Limited ("SIH"), we are pleased to offer you, with effect from 1 January 2003, the following terms and conditions of employment by SIH.

---



---

| | S.I. HOLDINGS LIMITED     
| | --------------------------
| | By:                       
| | Its:                      
| | Acknowledged and Accepted:
| | DR. MICHAEL W.J. SMURFIT  
| |                           
| | Date:                     

---

QuickLinks
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG   Document 68   Filed 08/04/21   Page 1 of 1
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF RYAN LOVELESS

My name is Ryan Loveless. I am over the age of 21 and am competent to make this 

declaration. The facts stated herein are within my personal knowledge and are true and correct. I 

am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Texas. I am with Etheridge Law Group in 

Southlake, Texas.

1. I signed a declaration on June 18, 2021 in support of WSOU’s response opposing 

ZTE’s motion to dismiss or transfer. My June 18, 2021 declaration accurately states that Exhibit 

9 to the declaration is a true and correct copy of

. Citations within WSOU’s response brief to 

Exhibit 9 refer to replacement Exhibit 9 attached to this Supplemental Declaration of Ryan 

Loveless.

2. In my June 18, 2021 declaration, I also referenced public SEC filings made by Gogo 

(see ¶ 9) and attached several agreements between Gogo and ZTE as Exhibits 5 – 8. Paragraph 9 

of my declaration, and the Gogo exhibits, should have also included a copy of the SEC filing located 

at https://ir.gogoair.com/node/8991/html, which is a Form 8-K filing by Gogo disclosing the 

location of Gogo towers, including the towers at the locations listed in paragraph 11 of the 

Supplemental 30(b)(6) Notice on ZTE, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

/s/ Ryan S. Loveless

Ryan S. Loveless
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Windrose
Medical Properties Trust (the "Company") for the year ending December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred S. Klipsch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ C. Douglas Hanson
----------------------------
C. Douglas Hanson
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 14, 2005
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5533 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pile fabrics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. YOUNG of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pile fabrics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PILE FABRICS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Pile fabrics, including ‘long 

pile’ fabrics and terry fabrics, knitted or crocheted: 

Other: Of manmade fibers 

(provided for in subheading 6001.92.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5533 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5508 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on electrically operated pencil 

sharpeners. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. STIVERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on electrically 

operated pencil sharpeners. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELECTRICALLY OPERATED PENCIL SHARP4 ENERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.82 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 electrically operated pencil sharpeners) is amended by 

8 striking the date in the effective period column and insert9 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5508 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 11 STERLING BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings Three Months Ended
 June 30,

Six Months Ended
 June 30,2008

2007

2008

2007Income from continuing
operations, net of
 tax

$
4,170,067

$
3,791,438

$
8,171,958

$
7,363,111Income/(Loss) from discontinued
operations, net of
 tax





71,252





(20,719
)Net income available for
common
 shareholders

$
4,170,067

$
3,862,690

$
8,171,958

$
7,342,392Weighted average common
shares outstanding


17,988,970


18,439,318


17,950,095


18,524,871Add dilutive effect
of:Stock
options


133,277


417,585


288,765


469,754Adjusted for assumed diluted
computation


18,122,247


18,856,903


18,238,860


18,994,625Income from continuing
operations, net of
 tax, per average common share:Basic

$
0.23

$
0.21

$
0.46

$
0.40Diluted

$
0.23

$
0.20

$
0.45

$
0.39Income/(Loss) from discontinued
operations, net of
 tax, per average common share:Basic

$


$


$


$
Diluted

$


$


$


$
Net income per average common
share:Basic

$
0.23

$
0.21

$
0.46

$
0.40Diluted

$
0.23

$
0.20

$
0.45

$
0.39 46
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5376 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5376

   To suspend temporarily the duty on Altuglas BS 100 beads, BS 110 
                        beads, and BS 130 beads.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Fitzpatrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on Altuglas BS 100 beads, BS 110 
                        beads, and BS 130 beads.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALTUGLAS BS 100 BEADS, BS 110 BEADS, AND BS 130 BEADS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Altuglas BS 100    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          beads (CAS No.                                                    12/31/2015
                          9010-88-2)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3906.10.00), BS
                          110 beads (CAS
                          No. 25034-86-0)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3906.90.50), and
                          BS 130 beads (CAS
                          No. 9010-88-2)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3906.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC. 

AND ZTE (TX), INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00487-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00488-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00489-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00490-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00491-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00492-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00493-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00494-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00495-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00496-ADA

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00497-ADA

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE REGARDING EXCHANGE OF 

NARROWED CLAIM TERMS FOR CONSTRUCTION

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s First Amended Scheduling Order, Dkt. 45,1 Defendants hereby 

notify the Court that Defendants served their narrowed claim terms for claim construction on 

Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development via electronic mail 

on February 26, 2021.

1 There are 11 pending cases. Citations throughout refer to new WDTX Case Nos. -00487 through -00497, and 

specific citations reference to the docket for WDTX Case No. -00487.

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 59 Filed 02/26/21 Page 1 of 2
2

DATED: February 26, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

/s/Lionel M. Lavenue 

Lionel M. Lavenue 

Virginia Bar No. 49,005

lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

1875 Explorer Street, Suite 800

Reston, VA 20190

Phone: (571) 203-2700

Fax: (202) 408-4400

Attorney for Defendants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system on February 26, 2021.

/s/Lionel M. Lavenue 

 Lionel M. Lavenue

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 59 Filed 02/26/21 Page 2 of 2
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

ZTE CORPORATION,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00497-ADA

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF 

INVALIDITY FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER ELIGIBILITY 

UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101

Came on for consideration Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for 

Lack of Subject Matter Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The Court having considered the 

Motion, the authorities cited therein, and any response thereto, finds that the Motion should be 

GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED AND ENTERED this _______ day of ___________________, 2022.

________________________________

ALAN D. ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00497-ADA-DTG Document 253-3 Filed 11/18/22 Page 1 of 1