alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
December 16, 2014

Wienke Tax

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

tax.wienke@usepa.gov

Sent Via e-mail 

Re: EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0708: Clean Data Determination for 1997 PM2.5 Standards; California—South 

Coast; Applicability of Clean Air Act Requirements

Dear Ms. Tax:

On behalf of Communities for a Better Environment (“CBE”), I am requesting a 14-day extension to the 

submit comments in the above-captioned rulemaking.

The Proposed Determination was published on December 9, 2014 and comments are due January 8, 2015. 

The comment period is occurring over the holiday period, and CBE is closed from December 23-January 5. 

As a result, we will be unable to work on comments for 14 days. In addition, CBE anticipates making 

technical comments that will require a highly specialized expert. It is difficult to find such an expert 

available during this time of year. 

CBE therefore respectfully requests that the EPA use its discretionary authority to extend the public 

comment period to January 22, 2015, for the above caption rulemaking.

Sincerely,

/s/

Maya Golden-Krasner

Staff Attorney

Communities for a Better Environment

maya@cbecal.org

Ext. 121

COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT

6325 Pacific Blvd Suite 300· Huntington Park, CA 90255 · P: (323) 826-9771 // F: (323) 588-7079

1904 Franklin Street Ste 600 · Oakland, CA 94612 · P: (510) 302-0430 // F: (510) 302-0437

1
COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT

6325 Pacific Blvd Suite 300· Huntington Park, CA 90255 · P: (323) 826-9771 // F: (323) 588-7079

1904 Franklin Street Ste 600 · Oakland, CA 94612 · P: (510) 302-0430 // F: (510) 302-0437

2
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rotech Healthcare
Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Philip L. Carter, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Steven P. Alsene, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of each such officers
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|       | 
|       |  | /s/    PHILIP L. CARTER              
|Name:  |  | Philip L. Carter                     
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | March 16, 2007                       
|       | 
|       |  | /s/    STEVEN P. ALSENE              
|Name:  |  | Steven P. Alsene                     
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|Date:  |  | March 16, 2007                       

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                          
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 1      | 9      | 1      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Texas--RRC District 3 onsh Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Texas--RRC District 3 onsh Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 7      | 53     | 51     | 1      | 64     | 29    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 152    | 17     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Pablo Valentin, Jr., Respondent, v Mila T. Valentin, Appellant.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated May 17, 1990, as, after a hearing, denied those branches of her motion which were to dismiss so much of the plaintiff husband’s complaint as seeks custody of the parties’ child, and to compel the plaintiff husband to return the child to her pending a determination of the issue of custody by a court of competent jurisdiction, and granted temporary custody of the child to the plaintiff husband.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, those branches of the defendant’s motion which were to dismiss so much of the plaintiff husband’s complaint as seeks custody of the parties’ child, and to compel him to return the child to her pending determination of the issue of custody by a court of competent jurisdiction, *391are granted, and so much of the complaint as demands custody is severed and dismissed.

The record reveals that the parties’ child resided in California with the defendant wife from about November 1987 to August 1988 when the child was taken to New York by the plaintiff husband. Shortly thereafter, on or about August 30, 1988, the plaintiff husband commenced the instant action for a divorce, and included a demand for custody in his complaint. The defendant wife moved to dismiss the custody demand on the ground that the court did not have subject matter jurisdiction over custody pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 75-d. The court conducted a hearing and determined, for reasons unstated, that the New York court did have jurisdiction over the demand for custody, and granted temporary custody to the plaintiff husband. The defendant wife appeals, contending that the courts of New York did not have jurisdiction over this custody matter. We agree and reverse.

At the time of the commencement of the instant action by the plaintiff husband, the "home state” of the child was California since the child had been continuously residing in that State with her mother since November 1987 (Domestic Relations Law § 75-c [5]; § 75-d [1] [a]). New York cannot assume jurisdiction over the custody demand pursuant to Domestic Relations Law §75-d (1) (b), since this section may not be utilized if the child has a "home state” other than New York *(see,*Domestic Relations Law §75-d [1] [b]; 28 USC § 1738A [c] [2] [B]; *Matter of Beddow v Beddow,*162 AD2d 598). Domestic Relations Law § 75-d (1) (c) is also inapplicable, since the record does not support the contention that the child was abandoned by her mother or that the child was abused or mistreated by the mother. As such, New York does not have jurisdiction over the custody demand. So much of the plaintiff’s complaint as demands custody is severed and dismissed, and the plaintiff is directed to return the child to the mother *(see, Matter of Michael P. v Diana G.,*156 AD2d 59). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). JT K / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B E RNA R DO GU Z MAN- AR AN DA , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74272 A ge nc yN o. A 047- 347- 949 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 16, 2010 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , P R E G E R S O N , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B e rnar do G uz m an- A r anda , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s ( “I J ” ) r e m o v a l o r d e r . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u an t to 

# FI LED MA R 24 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ T K / Res ea r ch 07- 74272 2 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew de no vo w hether the st atut ory r i gh tt o cou nselw as v io la te d . Mendo za-M

azari egos v. Mukasey , 5 0 9 F .3 d1 0 7 4 ,1 0 7 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) . W e g ran tth e p et i t i o n fo r rev i ew an drem an dfo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s. G uzm an-A rand a w as deni ed hi s s t atut ory r i gh tt o cou nselbecause the IJ f a ile dto s e c u r e h is k n o w in g a n dv o lu n taryw a iv e ro f th e r ig h t, s e e H

e rn a n dez - G il v. G on zales , 47 6 F . 3d 80 3, 80 6 (9th C i r. 20 07 ), and d i d n ot“ i nq ui re w hether there [w as ] go od cause t o g rant[G uzm an-A rand a] m ore t i m e t o o bt ai n cou nsel , ” B i w ot v. G on zales , 403 F . 3d 1094, 1100 ( 9th C i r . 2005) . M or e ove r , the abs e nc e of c o u n s e l a t G u z m an - A r an d a ’s h e a r in g r e s u lte din p r e ju d ic e . See T

aw adrus v . A s h c r o ft , 36 4 F . 3d 10 99 , 11 06 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( al i en dem on strat ed prej ud i ce w here an att orney c ou l d h ave a ss i st ed hi m i n h i s t es t i m on y and coul d h ave m ade l egal obj ec t i on s t o the adm i ss i on of ce rt ai n evi dence). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**OfficerCertification**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSPS on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Form 10-Q), each of theundersigned officers of the SPS certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tosuch officer’s knowledge:

 

(1)                      The Form10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                       Theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of SPS as of thedates   and for the periodsexpressed in the Form 10-Q.

 
| Date: May 2, 2005                          |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                       |
| /s/ GARY L. GIBSON                         |   |
| Gary L. Gibson                             |
| President and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                                       |
| /s/ BENJAMIN G.S. FOWKE III                |   |
| Benjamin G.S. Fowke III                    |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                            |  |  |

 

The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed aspart of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this statement required by Section 906, has been providedto SPS and will be retained by SPS and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 15



August 8, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, Northwest
Washington, D.C.  20549
Attn:  Document Control

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated July 25, 2002 on our
review of the interim condensed consolidated financial
information of 7-Eleven, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
"Company") as of June 30, 2002 and for the three-month and
six-month periods then ended, and included in the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended, is
incorporated by reference in the following Registration
Statements:


                                         REGISTRATION NO.
                                         ----------------
On Form S-8 for:

  7-Eleven, Inc. 1995 Stock
     Incentive Plan                           33-63617

  7-Eleven, Inc. Supplemental
     Executive Retirement Plan for
     Eligible Employees                      333-42731

  7-Eleven, Inc. Stock Compensation
    Plan for Non-Employee Directors          333-68491


Very truly yours,

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Dallas, Texas





                                  Tab 1
Exhibit 10.4
                                                      Pittway Corporation
                                                      September 30, 1999
                                                      Form 10-Q


                       PITTWAY CORPORATION
                      CHANGE OF CONTROL PLAN
                           ACCEPTANCE


     The undersigned, who is a party to an Employment Agreement
with Pittway Corporation ("Pittway") dated as of January 1, 1998,
as amended as of March 18, 1999, and who has been designated by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Pittway
to participate in the Pittway Corporation Change of Control Plan
that became effective September 15, 1999 (the "Plan"), hereby
accepts the terms of the Plan.

     Dated: October 22, 1999.


                                Paul R. Gauvreau
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000092066
<NAME> EFFICIENCY LODGE, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,114,597
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  622,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     90,804
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      19,279,394
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,816,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,060,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     18,960,270
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       104,369
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,060,595
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,233,670
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,649,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             674,727
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                969,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                   349,614
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            619,693
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   619,693
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08


</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5497 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain warp knit open-work 

fabrics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. SCHMIDT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain warp 

knit open-work fabrics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WARP KNIT OPEN-WORK FABRICS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Warp knit open-work fabrics (provided for in subheading 6005.31.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5497 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS