alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
5560 Overland Avenue  Suite 210  San Diego, California 92123  T 858 565 7285  F 858 565 7290  www.LoweEnterprises.com March 21, 2012 The Honorable Ray LaHood U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Alaska Airlines’ application for SAN-DCA, Dock et No. DOT-OST-2012-0029.

Dear Secretary LaHood:

Lowe Enterprises fully supports the application of Alaska Airlines for air service between San Diego and Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA). San Diego is the largest region without
direct service to DCA. Additionally, due to the profound community of inte rest between San Diego and the nation’s capital, the region generate s the largest passenger market demand without nonstop service to the convenient and close -in airport serving our nation’s capitol

.

San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington coupled with the fact that San Diego to Dulles average airfares are the highest of west coast citi es, should qualify for the limited slots available for this flight. The high airfare is exacerbated w hen factoring in taxi fares from Dulles to Washington’s city center that average about $60 eac h way. This means travelers between Washington’s city center and San Diego via Dulles c an pay on average close to $400 one-way.

There are also countless other San Diego-based and Washington-based businesses that are engaged in health science, telecommunications, and national defense that need quick and convenient access to Reagan National Airport. Lowe Enterprises has an immediate need for additional nonstop air service to our nation’s capi tal. Alaska Airlines service would add a needed nonstop option to a primary gateway to Washi ngton, DC. Lowe Enterprises joins with the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, th e San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, the World Trade Center San Diego, and the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce in support of Alaska Airlines’ application for San Diego – Washington Reagan National slots.

We thank the Department of Transportation for the o pportunity to comment on the above referenced docket and we hope to hear of a favorabl e review of Alaska Airlines’ San Diego – DCA proposal soon.

Sincerely, Lowe Enterprises Real Estate Group

Michael McNerney
Senior Vice President
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Group Ventures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report"), I, Raoul Tsakok, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | By: | /s/ Raoul Tsakok     
| | --- | ---------------------
| |     | Raoul Tsakok         
| |     | Chairman & CEO       
| |     |                      
| |     | Date: August 25, 2011

---
|                                                                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                                        
|Texas - RRC District 9 Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                        
|Texas - RRC District 9 Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 73     | 15     | 252    | 620    | 587    | 405    | 1,433  | 6      | 223    | 21    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 44     | 1,519  | 282    | 20     | 0      | 254    | 318    | 309    | 483    | 75    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,129  | 204    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC.,

EMC CORPORATION, VMWARE, INC.

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00480-ADA

ORDER RESETTING Pretrial PRETRIAL Conference CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is reset for

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE in District Courtroom #1, on the Third Floor of the United States

Courthouse, 800 Franklin Ave, Waco,aco TX, on Wednesday, February 01, 2023 at 01:30 PM.

Reset

IT 11th day of January, 2023.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA-DTG Document 298 Filed 01/11/23 Page 1 of 1
#### PAUL v. ALLENDER BROWN CO. et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 23, 1952.

R. E. Lee Murphy, Lexington, for appellant.

Leer Buckley and I. J. Miller, Lexington, for appellees.

STEWART, Justice.

This case requires us to review the validity of an order sustaining a special demurrer to the petition in an appeal of Joe Paul from the Workmen’s Compensation Board to thfe Fayette Circuit Court for the reason that the appeal was not taken in time. Joe Paul has appealed from the judgment dismissing his petition after he declined to plead further.

The facts are that on September 5, 1950, appellant filed a motion before the Board, pursuant to KRS 342.125, to reopen an award previously made to him, alleging change of condition on -his part and fraud and mistake upon the part of appellees. An order overruling this motion was entered by the Board on September 19, 1950. On October 9, 1950, appellant filed a motion seeking to have the Board reconsider and set aside its order of September 19th. The last motion was ordered overruled by the Board on October 17, 1950. An appeal was prosecuted by appellant on October 26, 1950, from the Board to circuit court with the result that the case was dismissed because the lower court adjudged it was not filed before it within the 20-day period of time required by KRS 342.285(1).

The question to be decided is: Should the 20-day period of time be calculated from September 19th or from October 17th?

So much of KRS 342.285(1) as applies to this case is as follows:

> “ * * * An award or order of the board upon review * * *, shall be conclusive and binding as to all questions of fact, but either party may, within twenty days after the rendition of such final award or order of the board, by petition appeal to the circuit court that would have jurisdiction to try an action for damages for the injuries if this chapter did not exist, for the review of such order or award, the ■board and the adverse party being made respondents.”

It cannot he doubted that the order of the Board on September 19th overruling appellant’s motion to reopen his claim was a final disposition of his case. In interpreting KRS 342.285(1), we have held that when the Board enters a final order it is conclusive and binding and any attempt by it to change or modify the order is void and of no effect. The aggrieved *164party’s remedy is by an appeal to the circuit court within 20 days thereafter. See Washington v. Clover Fork Coal Co., 269 Ky. 604, 108 S.W.2d 502. Therefore, since more than 20 days had elapsed between September 19th, the date of the final order, and October 26th, the date the appeal was filed in circuit court, it follows that the appeal was barred by limitation.

Wherefore, the'judgment is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Plaintiff

v. 

DROPBOX, INC, 

Defendant

Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-00251-ADA

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

DROPBOX, INC., 

Defendant.

Civil Action No.: 6:21-cv-758-ADA

JUDGMENT

A jury trial commenced in the above-captioned matter on May 15, 2023. On May 19, 2023, 

the jury reached and returned its unanimous verdict finding: that Dropbox does not infringe any of 

claims 3, 6, or 14 of U.S. Patent No. 10,013,158, any of claims 12, 20, or 27 of U.S. Patent No. 

10,021,052, claim 46 of U.S. Patent No. 10,587,548, or claim 18 of U.S. Patent No. 11,044,215

(collectively, the “Asserted Claims”); that Motion Offense had not proven by a preponderance of 

the evidence that any Asserted Claim was entitled to a priority date of September 25, 2012; and 

that each Asserted Claim is invalid. See Dkt. No. 382.

Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in accordance with the 

jury’s unanimous verdict and the entirety of the record, the Court hereby ORDERS and ENTERS 

JUDGMENT as follows: 

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 439 Filed 08/29/24 Page 1 of 2
1. Dropbox does not infringe any of the Asserted Claims;

2. None of the Asserted Claims are entitled to a priority date of September 25, 2012;

3. Each of the Asserted Claims is invalid;

4. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), Local Rule CV-54, and 28 U.S.C.

§ 1920, Dropbox is the prevailing party in this matter and shall recover its costs from

Motion Offense; and 

5. All other requests for relief now pending and requested by either party but not

specifically addressed herein are DENIED.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to CLOSE the above-captioned matter. 

SIGNED this 29th day of August, 2024. 

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 439 Filed 08/29/24 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00454-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00455-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00455-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00456-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00457-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00458-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00459-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00460-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00461-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00462-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00463-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00464-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00465-ADA

JOINT MOTION TO ENTER FIRST AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s November 10, 2020 Order, the Parties jointly move to amend the 

scheduling ordering in accordance with Version 3.2 of the Court’s Order Governing Proceeding 

entered November 5, 2020. The Parties have adopted the Markman briefing format in OGP 3.2 in

the Proposed First Amended Scheduling Order attached as Exhibit A. 

Date: November 20, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge 

Texas Bar No. 24059147 

Ryan S. Loveless 

Texas Bar No. 24036997 

Brett A. Mangrum 

Texas Bar No. 24065671 

Travis L. Richins 

Texas Bar No. 24061296 

Jeff Huang 

Case 6:20-cv-00455-ADA Document 34 Filed 11/20/20 Page 1 of 3
Etheridge Law Group, PLLC 

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324 

Southlake, TX 76092 

Tel.: (817) 470-7249 

Fax: (817) 887-5950 

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Jeff@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

/s/ Irene Yang (with permission)

Barry K. Shelton 

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620 S, Suite 205

Austin, TX 78734

Telephone: (512) 263-2165

Fax: (512) 263-2166

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

Of Counsel

Michael J. Bettinger

Irene Yang

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

555 California St., Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 772-1200

Fax: (415) 772-7400

mbettinger@sidley.com 

irene.yang@sidley.com 

Case 6:20-cv-00455-ADA Document 34 Filed 11/20/20 Page 2 of 3
Richard A. Cederoth

John W. McBride

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

1 South Dearborn St.

Chicago, IL 60603

Telephone: (312) 853-7000

Fax: (312) 853-7036

rcederoth@sidley.com 

jwmcbride@sidley.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Microsoft Corporation

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered electronically 

via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, on November 

20, 2020.

/s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge 

Case 6:20-cv-00455-ADA Document 34 Filed 11/20/20 Page 3 of 3
!" ##

$

%&'()*+,**)'-.

,

//&

.0#0!1!"

234564.&.&.



	7789
8

:	77

;

;888<	

7
9



	

.0#0!1!"/==>0?@/==>0ABC0D0EFGD=, 10H!=" +0=#"C0D0+0!"I010D D+J "

10+ H =!KLMNOPQQRSNTTUH0=)*))VW*)*))XV'VYV-)?I01 DF)Y)*))B

?C0D0 !#"0D@KLMNPQQRSNAB""+C01H&ZC E "KLMNPQQRSN[H10+ 101=!F)Y)*))

#"0D+=\G0" =!=#ED 0# !>=!/==>0]HG0!1 !>3G1"01GG=H01=" =!"=6D!H#0D

?C0D0 !#"0D@/==>0]H=" =!"=6D!H#0DAB^NN._"')

KLMNPQQRSN HGD" +JDFD00,!""=/==>0]H=" =!"=6D!H#0D%G0+ # +F !KLMN

PQQRSN"C0I010D D+J "!F`01D>J\0!"H!10, 10!+0D0>D1 !>"C0+=!,0! 0!+0#+"=DH

J!10DI #"C D+J "[!1)a3%$VW*W?B !D0" =!"=/==>0]H?!1="C0DGD" 0H]B

D0bJ0H""="D!H#0D,0!J0"="C0=D"C0D!. H"D +"=# #=D! KLMNPQQRSN"c)de!

!F` !>"C0GJE +!1GD ,"0 !"0D0H"#+"=DH"C0I010D D+J "=D10D01"C0+H0"D!H#0DD01

"="C0.Kf"ce

"C=J>CKLMNPQQRSN H!=!GD0+010!"  " H !H"DJ+" ,0D0>D1 !>"C0GD=G0D

0,J" =!!1[0 >C" !>=#"C0,D =JH"D!H#0D#+"=DH !"C H+H0/==>0D0HG0+"#JFD0bJ0H"H

"C0=JD""_0!=" +0=#!1+=!H 10DKLMNPQQRSN !10+ 1 !>/==>0]H=" =!"=6D!H#0D

Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 94 Filed 05/24/22 Page 1 of 3
	




 	

	 !"#$%&'()!*

+,-./0123"4567(6!8

,+,019:0;.+ <+:0.=+;23"4567(6!8

>+:0+;9:0;.+ :?@023"4567(6!8

09:0;.+ A,	+0B.=+,0?23"4567(6!8

;,	+0+,0?9:0;.+ C/@DBEFAB@@C

GHB+:-1,,IJ:K++,

=:;+E@L
L
L

2MH
8NNOL




KP2MH
8NNOLH



+,.@,0Q23"4567(6!8

,+,,0Q9:0;.+ C/@DBEFAB@@C




C,1I0

F?R+,1FRH
HLL

2
H
8MHSOL




KP2
H
8MHNO
N


:.T,23"4567(6!8

:1,9:0;.+ C/@DBEFAB@@C

H
H=+,0B,S:K++,

B0K,0+=NHHH

2HJ8SJLOG




KP2HJ8SJLOGH



,F.,+023"4567(6!8

,,+09:0;.+ =+.,;23"4567(6!8

+,;9:0;.+ C/@DBEFAB@@C

GGPI,IH
:K++,

B0;+=N
H
H

2SJS8JSOM




KP2SJS8JSOM

J




Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 94 Filed 05/24/22 Page 2 of 3
	














  !"#$"%&' ()!!"*!"#''

!+ 

# 

,-



	#./

+01,2-13

401,2-13

56789:;<6=>:<:8?@8AB66C;:DD5

EFGHIJIEKHFLJMFGNIEF



	


O4+P
+Q!R+
	'+P
+!S31#*OTU
QU


O
#	)U,-#,,,#++
	+QVOOR	
OT	R

V
OUQ
OQ	R
O!

W!)XY!4U


Z9Z[6\:=A]^_8`a:;

PT
b%	c+



Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 94 Filed 05/24/22 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 15



August 3, 2001

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, Northwest
Washington, D.C.  20549
Attention:  Document Control

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated July 26, 2001 on our review
of condensed consolidated interim financial information of 7-
Eleven, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of and for the
six months ended June 30, 2001, and included in the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended, is
incorporated by reference in the following Registration
Statements:


                                         REGISTRATION NO.
                                         ----------------
On Form S-8 for:

  7-Eleven, Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive
    Plan                                      33-63617

  7-Eleven, Inc. Supplemental Executive
    Retirement Plan for Eligible Employees   333-42731

  7-Eleven, Inc. Stock Compensation
    Plan for Non-Employee Directors          333-68491


Very truly yours,

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Dallas, Texas





                                  Tab 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 92 DB 2020 (No. 56 RST 2020)

:

JOSEPH VERN ERWIN : Attorney Registration No. 79395

: 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

 FROM INACTIVE STATUS : (Out Of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of August, 2020, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated August 18, 2020, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Joseph Vern Erwin, who has been on Inactive Status, has demonstrated that he has the 

moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in 

the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of 

the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL 

INC., AND EMC CORPORATION,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00476-ADA

PATENT CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUSH SUBPOENA

Having considered the motion to quash and motion for protective order filed by William J. 

Tucker and Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC (“WSOU”), the Court finds the motion is well taken 

and should be GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED that Dell’s subpoena issued on May 27, 2021

against Mr. Tucker is quashed. 

Presiding Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-628-000]

Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC, (KMIGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1-A and Fourth Revised Volume 1-B, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing, to become effective November 1, 2000.

                    KMGT states that the proposed changes update the KMIGT tariff and clarify or simplify certain tariff provisions. Through the proposed changes KMIGT: revises the provisions regarding capacity release by small customer service (SCS) shippers;                           ( print page 60419)                        clarifies the provision concerning incidental purchases and sales of gas; and makes a number of housekeeping changes to various tariff sheets.                

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26050  Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M