alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Mark A. Maki, certify that:

1.    I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C.;

2.    Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:



5.    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of the registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 25, 2005

|/s/MARK A. MAKIMark A. Maki
Vice President, Finance and Principal Financial Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2



March 12, 2004



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Andrew N. Halford, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cellco
Partnership (the "Partnership"), certify that:

     (1)  the report of the Partnership on Form 10-K for the year ending
          December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
          of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership as of the dates and for the periods presented in
          the Report.



/s/ Andrew N. Halford
------------------------------------------
Andrew N. Halford
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cellco Partnership and will be retained by Cellco Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Hotel Outsource Management International, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2011as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jacob Ronnel, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, and I, Daniel Cohen, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






By: /s/Jacob RonnelJacob Ronnel, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting OfficerHotel Outsource Management International, Inc.January 28, 2013




By: /s/Daniel CohenDaniel Cohen, President, Principal Executive OfficerHotel Outsource Management International, Inc.January 28, 2013
EERE Information Center

Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version

Refrigerated Beverage

Vending Machines Notice of

Proposed Rulemaking

Technical Support Document

This page presents the chapters and

appendices of the technical support document,

which provides the analyses and results

supporting the information presented in the

notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) for

refrigerated beverage vending machines.

The following documents are available as

Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe Reader.

Title Page (PDF 20 KB)

Acronyms and Abbreviations (PDF 16

KB)

Chapters

Chapter 1: Introduction (PDF 52 KB)

Chapter 2: Analytical Framework

(PDF 136 KB)

Chapter 3: Market and Technology

Assessment (PDF 316 KB)

Chapter 4: Screening Analysis (PDF 40

KB)

Chapter 5: Engineering Analysis

(PDF 268 KB)

Chapter 6: Markups for Equipment Price

Determination (PDF 68 KB)

Chapter 7: Energy Use Characterization

(PDF 212 KB)

Chapter 8: Life-Cycle Cost and Payback

Period Analysis (PDF 312 KB)

Chapter 9: Trial Standard Levels

(PDF 48 KB)

Chapter 10: Shipments Analysis

(PDF 132 KB)

Chapter 11: National Impact Analysis

(PDF 144 KB)

Chapter 12: Life-Cycle Cost Sub-Group

Analysis (PDF 64 KB)

Chapter 13: Manufacturer Impact

Analysis (PDF 380 KB)

Chapter 14: Utility Impact Analysis

(PDF 208 KB)

Chapter 15: Net National Employment

Impact Analysis (PDF 40 KB)

Chapter 16: Environmental Impact

Analysis (PDF 144 KB)

Chapter 17: Regulatory Impact Analysis

(PDF 52 KB)

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Refrigerated Beverag... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial...

1 of 2 5/28/2009 8:10 AM

EERE-2006-STD-0125 COMMENT 46
Appendices

Appendix A: Instructions for Using the

Engineering Analysis Spreadsheet

(PDF 216 KB)

Appendix B: Engineering Data (PDF 76

KB)

Appendix C: Detailed Data for

Equipment Price Markups (PDF 36 KB)

Appendix D: Typical Meteorological Year

(TMY2) Assignments (PDF 2.7 MB)

Appendix E: User Instruction for

Life-Cycle Cost Spreadsheet (PDF 44

KB)

Appendix F: Detailed Life-Cycle Cost

Output (PDF 3.1 MB)

Appendix G: User Instructions for NIA

Spreadsheets (PDF 52 KB)

Appendix H: Detailed National Energy

Savings and National Net Present Value

Output (PDF 316 KB)

Appendix I: Estimation of Marginal Heat

Rates and Site to Source Conversion

Factors (PDF 172 KB)

Appendix J: Manufacturer Impact

Analysis Interview Guide and

Government Regulatory Input Model

(PDF 248 KB)

Appendix K: Estimation of Utility and

Environmental Results from NEMS-BT

Output (PDF 88 KB)

Contact Information

Charles Llenza

Project Manager

(202) 586-2192

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 05/21/2009

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Refrigerated Beverag... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial...

2 of 2 5/28/2009 8:10 AM

EERE-2006-STD-0125 COMMENT 46
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

** Each defendant-appellant has adopted the issues and arguments raised in the other appellant's brief. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(i).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-11072 Summary Calendar

__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHYANN FINE BRATCHER; BRENDA ROBERTSON FINE, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:95-CR-9

- - - - - - - - - - July 8, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Chyann Fine Bratcher and Brenda Robertson Fine appeal their convictions for conspiracy to commit mail fraud, several counts of mail fraud, conspiracy to commit murder, and aiding and abetting murder with premeditation and malice aforethought. **No. 95-11072 -2- Bratcher argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions for conspiracy to murder and for aiding and abetting murder. Our review of the record confirms that there was more than sufficient evidence to sustain these counts of conviction. See United States v. Pierre , 958 F.2d 1304, 1310 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 898 (1992). Fine's adoption of Bratcher's sufficiency argument is insufficient, without more, to raise the argument as to Fine. See United States v. Harris , 932 F.2d 1529, 1533 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 502 U.S. 897 (1991). Bratcher and Fine argue that the district court abused its discretion by disallowing the expert testimony concerning the polygraph examination of Thomas Earl Fine, Jr. (Tommy). The argument is premised upon caselaw being sufficient to establish the requisite reliability of proffered expert testimony pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702. This premise is contrary to United States v. Posado , 57 F.3d 428, 434 (5th Cir. 1995). Our review of the record detects no abuse of discretion in the district court's ruling. See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , 113 S. Ct. 2786, 2796-97 (1993). Bratcher and Fine argue that the district court abused its discretion by denying their joint motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, namely, Tommy's affidavit and hearing testimony recanting his earlier testimony. In light of theNo. 95-11072 -3- district court's credibility determination, made from the best position to evaluate the new evidence in light of the whole record of the trial over which the district court presided, we find no abuse of discretion. See United States v. MMR Corp. , 954 F.2d 1040, 1049-50 (5th Cir. 1992). Bratcher and Fine's remaining argument, that the prosecution should be barred, pursuant to the Due Process Clause, based on the purported outrageous government conduct, is without merit.
AFFIRMED.
#### LOPEZ v. STATE.

No. 25908.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1952.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 15, 1952.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from the order revoking the suspension of the execution of sentence and placing appellant upon parole.

The record before us does not contain a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
P 0 L Y U R E T H A N E S
Dalton , GA H i ckory, NC September 22 , 20 1 4
Ms. Margaret Shepperd U.S
. Environmenta l Protection Agency 1200 Penn sylvania Ave. (62 05T ) Washington , DC 20460 De a r Margaret: PO Box 1528 • Mount Airy, NC 27030-1528 800.346.8229 • Fax 336.789.9586 • www.NCFI. co m
Moun t A i ry , NC Sa l t L ake C i ty , U T

Thi s lette r is se n t in follow-up to our meeting in Washington , D C on Thur sday , August 28
. At t hat t i me Ci ndy Newberg requested that we sub mi t summary comments in wri t ing
. S ince Cindy did not ye t h ave cards with her new address, I a m sen d ing thi s to you f or review and inclu sion in the docket. I have highli gh t e d in ye ll ow those comments which contain CBI (Co nfi dent i a

l Bu siness Informatio n) and shoul d not be a part of t he pub li c record
. NCFI Polyure thanes is a s peci alty sys t ems hou se which produces a wide vari ety of polyurethane chemica l systems , bo t h s pra y and pour used in both insul ating an d non-insu l ating app li cat i ons f rom our two faci li t i es in Mount Airy, NC and Salt Lake City , Utah
. NCFI has manufactured liquid chemical sys t ems si nce 1967 and flexible slab s tock since 1 964
. We are a divis i on ofBamhardt Manuf acturing Company ba sed in Cha rl otte, NC , w hich has been in business since 1900. NCFI r eceived the EPA S t ratospheric Ozone Pro t ect i on Award in 2004 f o

r our work in developing to market formu l at ion s u t ilizing hydrocarbon blowing agents from Exxon. The introduct i on ofHFO based, l ow GWP blowing agents will mark our f ourth conversion of nonflammable liquid blowing agents into polyuret hane spray and pour chemistry. B ased on our exper i ence and extensive work so fa r , this mo l ecule will be the most difficul t to formu l at e successfull y into robu s t, shelf sta ble systems that perform in field and in pl ant over a wi de va rie ty of weather or plant condit i ons, alt i tude, customer and/or lis t ing agency requirements.

A Division of BMC , Inc

. NCFI since 1964 BARNHARDT MFG. CO

. since 1900Respec t fully Submitted , NCFI Polyurethane s

# ~~\0-**~** Clarence Tolbet t Vi ce Pre si dent

# if~~ Richard Stoehr Direc tor of Re sea rch & Development
#### MOON v. STATE.

No. 23656.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 14, 1947.

Rehearing Denied June 11, 1947.

No attorney for appellant.

• Ernest S. Goens,- State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a penalty of two years in the penitentiary upon a conviction for theft.

The record as presented contains neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts. The proceedings are regular and nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 50246 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
EDGAR ANTUNEZ

- PEREZ, also known as Edgar Julian Antunez, also known as Edgar Perez, also known as Carlos Garcia Rodriguez, also known as Carlos Hernandez

- Garcia, also known as Edgar Antunez , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:13

- CR

- 496

- 1

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar Antunez

Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Antunez

- Perez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 17, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-50246 Document: 00512873655 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2014No. 14

- 50246

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from furthe r responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-50246 Document: 00512873655 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2014
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

***Certificationpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

***(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)***

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of American States Water Company andGolden State Water Company (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Robert J. Sprowls, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| /s/ ROBERT J. SPROWLS                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert J. Sprowls                      |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|                                   |   |
| Date:  November 5, 2009           |   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                       Exhibit 8

            LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF VIATEL HOLDING (BERMUDA) LIMITED

- VTL-TP (Bermuda) Limited (Bermuda)

- Viatel Belgium NV (Belgium)

- Viatel Operations SA (France)

- VTL, Inc. (U.S.)

      -     Viatel Belgium Limited (UK)

      -     Viatel Circe Assets Limited (UK)

      -     VTL (UK) Limited (UK)

            - Viatel Internet Limited

- Viatel Broadband Limited (UK)

- Viatel Holding (Europe) Limited (UK)

      -     Viatel Equipment Limited (UK)

      -     VTL Telecom GmbH (UK)

      -     Viatel German Asset GmbH (Gemany)

      -     Viatel Global Communications BV (The Netherlands)

            - Viafoperations Communications BV (The Netherlands)

      -     Viaphone AG

      -     Cybernet (Schweiz) AG
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5226 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5226

  To suspend temporarily the duty on check valves of steel, having an 
 opening less than approximately 7.62 cm. in diameter and certified by 
 the importer as meeting ASME III certification requirements (but not 
meeting ASME B16.34 certification requirements) as approved for use in 
                          nuclear facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Mulvaney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on check valves of steel, having an 
 opening less than approximately 7.62 cm. in diameter and certified by 
 the importer as meeting ASME III certification requirements (but not 
meeting ASME B16.34 certification requirements) as approved for use in 
                          nuclear facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHECK VALVES OF STEEL, HAVING AN OPENING LESS THAN 
              APPROXIMATELY 7.62 CM. IN DIAMETER AND CERTIFIED BY THE 
              IMPORTER AS MEETING ASME III CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 
              (BUT NOT MEETING ASME B16.34 CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS) 
              AS APPROVED FOR USE IN NUCLEAR FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Check valves of     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        steel, having an                                                   31/2015.......
                        opening less than
                        approximately
                        7.62 cm. in
                        diameter and
                        certified by the
                        importer as
                        meeting ASME III
                        certification
                        requirements (but
                        not meeting ASME
                        B16.34
                        certification
                        requirements) as
                        approved for use
                        in nuclear
                        facilities
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8481.30.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00454-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00456-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00457-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00458-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00460-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00461-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00462-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00463-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00464-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00465-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO RESET PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND 

TRIAL DATES

The Court, having considered the Joint Motion to Reset Pretrial Conference and Trial 

Dates, hereby ORDERS that the motion is GRANTED. 

For Civil Action Nos. 6:20-cv-00454, -461, and -465, the final pretrial conference is reset 

to June 14, 2022 and trial is reset to June 21, 2022.

For Civil Action Nos. 6:20-cv-00-456, -458, -460, -462, and -464, the final pretrial 

conference is reset to July 12, 2022 and trial is reset to July 19, 2022.

For Civil Action Nos. 6:20-cv-00457 and 6:20-cv-00463, the final pretrial conference is 

reset to July 26, 2022 and trial is reset to August 2, 2022.

SIGNED this _________ day of _________________ 2022.

___________________________________

HONORABLE ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 104-1 Filed 01/11/22 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.7
 INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
2003 RESTRICTED STOCK DEFERRAL PLAN FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS
 As Amended and Restated Effective December 31, 2008
 PURPOSE
  DEFINITIONS
  Board
 Cause




---



##### 



Change in Control
  provided however
   -2-




---



##### 



Committee
 Corporation
 Disability
 Fair Market Value
     Outside Director
 Plan
 -3-




---



##### 



Restricted Stock
 Restricted Stock Units
 Retirement
 Section 409A
 Separation from Service
 Stock
  Stock
  Stock
  Stock
 -4-




---



##### 



Subsidiary
 STOCK RESERVED UNDER PLAN
  4.
    
    ELECTION TO RECEIVE SHARES OF RESTRICTED STOCK OR RESTRICTED STOCK
UNITS
      -5-




---



##### 



RESTRICTED STOCK
            -6-




---



##### 



RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
  Deferrals in Respect of Retainer and Meeting Fees
        -7-




---



##### 



Deferrals in Respect of Annual Equity Awards
           -8-




---



##### 



RECAPITALIZATIONS
   provided however
     SECURITIES LAW REQUIREMENTS
 Legality of Issuance
   -9-




---



##### 



Registration or Qualification of Securities
 Exchange of Certificates
 LEGENDS
  TAXATION
  -10-




---



##### 



ADMINISTRATION
  AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION
  EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM
  -11-




---



##### 



APPROVAL OF STOCKHOLDERS
  GOVERNING LAW
  EXECUTION
  -12-




---



##### 



INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.By
    /s/ Jeffrey C. SprecherJeffrey C. Sprecher,Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy
    /s/ Johnathan H. ShortJohnathan H. Short,Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary  -13-