alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# TIME AND DATE:

7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Monday, March 6, 2000 and 8:30 a.m. to 12 noon to Tuesday, March 7, 2000.

# PLACE:

Westin Hotel—Seattle, 1900 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101.

# STATUS:

 Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Tours/Presentations Concerning King County Crisis Triage Unit/Pre-Booking Diversion, Seattle Police Department Crisis Intervention Team, King County Mental Health Court Proceedings and Post-Booking Diversion Proceedings; Updates on Mentally Ill in Prisons and Jails, the NIC Strategic Plan, Interstate Compact Activities, Advisory Board Hearings; Reports by Program Divisions; FY 2001 Service Plan Recommendations; and FY 2002 Budget Recommendations.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Larry Solomon, Deputy Director, (202) 307-3106, ext. 155.

Morris L. Thigpen,

Director.

[FR Doc. 00-2515  Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-36-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACOACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC.,

EMC CORPORATION, VMWARE, INC.

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00485-ADA

ORDER RESETTING DISCOVERY DISCOVERY HEARING

reset

Zoom

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is reset for

DISCOVERY HEARING by Zoom on March 11, 2022 at 01:30 PM .

10th day of March, 2022.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00485-ADA Document 165 Filed 03/10/22 Page 1 of 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 557 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to move the 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection into the Department of the 

Treasury. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2011 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 

to move the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

into the Department of the Treasury. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Financial 

5 Protection Oversight Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MOVING THE BUREAU FROM THE FEDERAL RE7 SERVE TO THE TREASURY. 

8 The Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 is 

9 amended— 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 557 IH

1 (1) in section 1011(a), by striking ‘‘Federal Re2 serve System’’ and inserting ‘‘Department of the 

3 Treasury’’; 

4 (2) in section 1012(c)— 

5 (A) in paragraph (2)— 

6 (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

7 ‘‘Board of Governors under the Federal 

8 Reserve Act, the Board of Governors’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘Secretary of the Treasury, the 

10 Secretary’’; and 

11 (ii) in subparagraph (C), by striking 

12 ‘‘Board of Governors or the Federal re13 serve banks’’ and inserting ‘‘Department 

14 of the Treasury’’; 

15 (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘Board 

16 of Governors. The Board of Governors’’ and in17 serting ‘‘Secretary of the Treasury. The Sec18 retary’’; 

19 (C) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘Board 

20 of Governors’’ and inserting ‘‘Secretary of the 

21 Treasury’’; and 

22 (D) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘Board 

23 of Governors, and the Board of Governors’’ and 

24 inserting ‘‘Secretary of the Treasury, and the 

25 Secretary’’; and 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 557 IH

1 (3) in section 1013(a), by striking paragraph 

2 (3). 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                     
|North Dakota Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                     
|North Dakota Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 7      | 47     | 1      | 12     | 1      | 59     | 44     | 28     | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 51     | 125    | 264    | 15     | 626    | 180    | 275    | 241    | W      | 3     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 500    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 23.1              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM    We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of The Standard Register Company and subsidiaries for the period ended April 1, 2007, as indicated in our report dated April 27, 2007; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements File No.'s 333-02683, 333-05231, 333-15851, 333-43055, 333-51189, 333-51181, 333-57779, 333-84483 and 333-86492.  We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.     /S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP    Dayton, Ohio May 2, 2007
Exhibit
99.4
 
 
 CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Standard
Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the six months ended February 29, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, B.
Gordon Brooke, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
 
 1.    The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.     The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.
 
 
 
 Date:
March 17, 2009
 
 GORDON
BROOKE
 B. Gordon
Brooke
 Chief
Accounting Officer
 Chief
Financial Officer and Director
 
 
 -1-
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.A


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2004, of Southern Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John W. Somerhalder II, Chairman of the Board and Director, certify (i) that
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ John W. Somerhalder II
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John W. Somerhalder II
                                           Chairman of the Board and Director
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

                                           May 14, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Southern Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Southern
Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 2148

RENEE L. MCCRAY , Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. , Respondent

– Appellee , and
CHARLES R. GOLDSTEIN , Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Stephanie A. Gallagher , District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv - 00973

- SAG )

Submitted : April 1, 2021 Decided: April 14, 2021

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Renee L. McCray , Appellant Pro Se. Sarah E. Meyer , WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Renee L. McCray appeals the district court’s order s ( 1) affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of McCray’s motion to reopen her bankruptcy proceeding, and (2) denying
her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible err or. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCray v. Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. , No. 1:20

- cv - 00973

- SAG (D. Md. Sept. 1 7 , 2020; Oct. 16, 2020) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order entered May 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00378-CV

METHODIST RICHARDSON MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant

V.

TINA CELLARS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-09173

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s May 13, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file a 

brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to May 28, 2019.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
#### WHITE v. STATE.

No. 26174.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 21, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for the offense of burglary, with punishment enhanced to life imprisonment in the state penitentiary *by*reason of two prior convictions for offenses of like nature.

The statement of facts in this case was filed in the trial court long after the expiration of the ninety-day period allowed by Art. 759a, Sec. 4, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

The statement of facts, having been filed' too late, cannot be considered.

No bills of exception appear.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) Mail Stop 8 REPORT ON THE 

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN P.O. Box 1450 ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR 

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 TRADEMARK 

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been 

filed in the U.S. District Court Western District of Texas - Waco Division on the following 

0 Trademarks or Patents. ( 0 the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.): 

DOCKET NO. 

6:20-cv-351 

I DATE FILED 

4/30/2020 

'U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

I Western District of Texas - Waco Division 

PLAINTIFF 

BIG WILL ENTERPRISES INC. 

DEFENDANT 

UNALIWEAR, INC. 

PATENT OR 

TRADEMARK NO. 

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK 

HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK 

1 9,049,558 BIG WILL ENTERPRISES INC. 

2 8,737,951 BIG WILL ENTERPRISES INC. 

3 8,559,914 BIG WILL ENTERPRISES INC. 

4 8,452,273 BIG WILL ENTERPRISES INC. 

5 

In the aboveentitled case, the following patent(s)! trademark(s) have been included: 

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY 

0 Amendment 0 Answer 0 Cross Bill 0 Other Pleading 

PATENT OR 

TRADEMARK NO. 

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK 

1 2 

3 

4 

5 

In the aboveentitled case, the following decision has been rendered orjudgement issued: 

DECISION/JUDGEMENT 

See 

CLERK 

i.C\ 

(BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE 

c/z0/ 

Copy 1Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director 

Copy 2Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4Case file copy 

Case 6:20-cv-00351-ADA Document 8 Filed 05/20/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Randgold Resources Limited (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Graham P. Shuttleworth, Finance Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                      
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |    |                                                                                                                                                    
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Graham P. Shuttleworth
Graham P. Shuttleworth
Finance Director
June 20, 2008

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Douglas Lewis, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered April 18, 1989, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of assault in the second and third degrees and sentencing him, as a predicate felon, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 to 4 years and a concurrent term of one year conditional discharge, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The conviction arose out of a fight between an estranged husband and wife which occurred at the apartment of a mutual friend. The wife and an acquaintance testified that a shouting match degenerated into a scuffle during which defen*304dant said "Bitch, I’ll kill you”, repeatedly kicked and beat the victim, and ultimately stabbed her in the upper part of her thigh. The defendant testified that he was attempting to leave the apartment but was prevented from doing so by his wife who had started scuffling with him. He stated that during the struggle, he accidentally stabbed her in the leg with a knife he had been using to pry open the door lock. Evidence revealed prior physical altercations between the parties. The People’s medical evidence established that the wife’s stab wound was three to four inches deep, and that the victim had spent several days in the hospital, on intravenous medication, as a result of the stabbing. After defendant had testified and the parties had rested, counsel requested leave to call a medical witness. Counsel stated that the witness would testify that the wound was not of a nature which was deliberate. The application was denied, and the court noted counsel’s exception.

On appeal, defendant contends that he was deprived of an opportunity to call a material witness to challenge the People’s proof as to the depth of the wound. On the basis of the offer of proof, which only claimed that the witness would testify that the wound was not deliberate and did not specify how the witness reached that conclusion, we find this claim to be unpreserved for review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Zambrano,*114 AD2d 872, *lv denied*67 NY2d 659). Were we to review in the interest of justice, we would note that under the circumstances of this case, defendant was not denied his opportunity to present a defense. Evidence of guilt was overwhelming, and the proposed testimony, as elaborated for the first time in the brief, would not persuade us that defendant was deprived of a fair trial.

Defendant’s objection to any portion of the prosecutor’s cross-examination of defendant was sustained by the trial court. Inasmuch as no further or curative instruction was sought by defense counsel we find nothing therein preserved for review *(see, People v Medina,*53 NY2d 951, 953).

We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Ross, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Syed B. Ali, Chief Executive Officer of Cavium Networks, Inc., certify that:1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cavium Networks, Inc.;2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 10, 2008            /s/Syed B. Ali      Syed B. Ali  Chief Executive Officer
KARNOVA AUSTIN

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3425

Opinion filed August 12, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Karnova Austin, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. S ee Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5478 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5478

 To suspend temporarily the duty on light emitting diode (LED) Tubular 
                              LED (TLED).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on light emitting diode (LED) Tubular 
                              LED (TLED).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) TUBULAR LED (TLED).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Light emitting      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          diode (LED)                                                       12/31/2015
                          Tubular LED
                          (TLED) (provided
                          for in subheading
                          9405.40.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```