alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 

Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 29-7 Filed 10/02/20 Page 1 of 3
,PSRUWDQW7KH3XEOLF5HFRUGVDQGFRPPHUFLDOO\DYDLODEOHGDWDVRXUFHVXVHGRQUHSRUWVKDYHHUURUV'DWDLVVRPHWLPHVHQWHUHG

SRRUO\SURFHVVHGLQFRUUHFWO\DQGLVJHQHUDOO\QRWIUHHIURPGHIHFW7KLVV\VWHPVKRXOGQRWEHUHOLHGXSRQDVGHILQLWLYHO\DFFXUDWH

%HIRUHUHO\LQJRQDQ\GDWDWKLVV\VWHPVXSSOLHVLWVKRXOGEHLQGHSHQGHQWO\YHULILHG)RU6HFUHWDU\RI6WDWHGRFXPHQWVWKHIROORZLQJ

GDWDLVIRULQIRUPDWLRQSXUSRVHVRQO\DQGLVQRWDQRIILFLDOUHFRUG&HUWLILHGFRSLHVPD\EHREWDLQHGIURPWKDWLQGLYLGXDOVWDWH
V

'HSDUWPHQWRI6WDWH7KHFULPLQDOUHFRUGGDWDLQWKLVSURGXFWRUVHUYLFHPD\LQFOXGHUHFRUGVWKDWKDYHEHHQH[SXQJHGVHDOHGRU

RWKHUZLVHKDYHEHFRPHLQDFFHVVLEOHWRWKHSXEOLFVLQFHWKHGDWHRQZKLFKWKHGDWDZDVODVWXSGDWHGRUFROOHFWHG

$FFXULQWGRHVQRWFRQVWLWXWHDFRQVXPHUUHSRUWDVWKDWWHUPLVGHILQHGLQWKHIHGHUDO)DLU&UHGLW5HSRUWLQJ$FW86&HWVHT

)&5$$FFRUGLQJO\$FFXULQWPD\QRWEHXVHGLQZKROHRULQSDUWDVDIDFWRULQGHWHUPLQLQJHOLJLELOLW\IRUFUHGLWLQVXUDQFHHPSOR\PHQW

RUDQRWKHUSHUPLVVLEOHSXUSRVHXQGHUWKH)&5$

<RXU'33$3HUPLVVLEOH8VH1R3HUPLVVLEOH3XUSRVH

<RXU*/%$3HUPLVVLEOH8VH1R3HUPLVVLEOH3XUSRVH

<RXU'0)3HUPLVVLEOH8VH1R3HUPLVVLEOH3XUSRVH

&RPSUHKHQVLYH%XVLQHVV5HSRUW

'DWH

5HIHUHQFH&RGH

&RPSDQ\1DPH:628,19(670(176//&

$GGUHVV$867,1$9(:$&27;0&/(11$1&2817<

3KRQH

7,1



1DPH9DULDWLRQV

&RPSDQ\1DPH:628,19(670(176//&

&RPSDQ\1DPH%5$=26'(9(/230(17$1'/,&(16,1*

&RPSDQ\1DPH%5$=26/,&(16,1*$1''(9(/230(17

7,19DULDWLRQV

&RPSDQ\7,1

&RPSDQ\1DPH:628,19(670(176//&

3DUHQW&RPSDQ\

>1RQH)RXQG@

%XVLQHVV)LOLQJV

,QGXVWU\,QIRUPDWLRQ

6,&&RGH

6,&'HVFULSWLRQ5DGLR%URDGFDVWLQJ6WDWLRQV

6,&&RGH

6,&'HVFULSWLRQ0LVF,QYHVWLQJ

%DQNUXSWFLHV

>1RQH)RXQG@

/LHQV	-XGJPHQWV

>1RQH)RXQG@

&RUSRUDWLRQ)LOLQJV

&RUSRUDWLRQ)LOLQJV

:628,19(670(176//&

1DPH7\SH/(*$/

Exhibit 4, Page 1

Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 29-7 Filed 10/02/20 Page 2 of 3
6WDWXV$&7,9(

)LOLQJ1XPEHU

)LOLQJ'DWH

)RUHLJQ,QFRUSRUDWLRQ'DWH

7\SH&5($7,21

)(,1

6WDWHRI,QFRUSRUDWLRQ7;

$QQXDO5HSRUW)LOLQJV

&RPPHQWV%5$=26'(9(/230(17$1'/,&(16,1*

)LOHG'DWH

&RPPHQWV:628,19(670(176

)LOHG'DWH

5HJLVWHUHG$JHQWV

&RPSDQ\1DPH&25325$7,216(59,&(&203$1<'%$&6&/$:<(56,1&25325$7,1*6(59,&(&2

$GGUHVV(7+6767($867,17;

'DWH/DVW6HHQ

%XVLQHVV5HJLVWUDWLRQ

1DPH:628,19(670(176//&

$GGUHVV$867,1$9(67(:$&27;

)LOLQJ1XPEHU

6WDWXV$FWLYH

&RUSRUDWLRQ&RGH6HFUHWDU\RI6WDWH

)LOLQJ'DWH

8&&)LOLQJVIRU%XVLQHVV

>1RQH)RXQG@

$VVRFLDWHG3HRSOH

%XVLQHVV&RQWDFWV

&XUUHQW,QGLYLGXDOV

1DPH678$576+$186

&RQWDFW7LWOH&217$&7

$GGUHVV$867,1$9(67(:$&27;

'DWH/DVW6HHQ

3ULRU,QGLYLGXDOV

>1RQH)RXQG@

([HFXWLYHV

&XUUHQW([HFXWLYHV

>1RQH)RXQG@

3ULRU([HFXWLYHV

>1RQH)RXQG@

7KLVSRUWLRQRIWKHUHSRUWFRQWDLQVLQIRUPDWLRQIURP'XQ	%UDGVWUHHW,QF

&RS\ULJKW'XQ	%UDGVWUHHW,QF$OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG

%XVLQHVV,QIRUPDWLRQIURP'XQ	%UDGVWUHHW

>1RQH)RXQG@

Exhibit 4, Page 2

Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 29-7 Filed 10/02/20 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) 

INC., AND ZTE (TX), INC. 

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-487

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-488

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-489

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-490

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-491

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-492

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-493

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-494

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-495

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-496

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-497

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Stay. After consideration of the Motion and the 

applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be DENIED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Stay is DENIED. 

SIGNED this _____ day of December, 2020. 

________________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 50-1 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL 

INC., AND EMC CORPORATION,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-404-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Please take notice that attorney Travis L. Richins of the law firm ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC 

appears as counsel of record for Plaintiff WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS LICENSING 

AND DEVELOPMENT. Mr. Richins hereby requests that all notices required to be given, and all papers 

required to be served in the above-entitled and numbered cause, be copied to and served upon him.

Dated: May 21, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Travis L. Richins

Travis L. Richins

Texas State Bar No. 24061296

ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Telephone: (817) 470-7249

Facsimile: (817) 887-5950

travis@etheridgelaw.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document was served upon all counsel of record via the 

Court's CM/ECF electronic filing system in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure on May 21, 2020.

/s/ Travis L. Richins

Travis L. Richins
WACO

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

NO: WA:20-CV-00473-ADA

ORDER

telephone telephone conference 12/07/2020

vs.

on at 10:00 AM

12/03/2020

Alan D Albright

SIGNED on

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

§

§

§

§

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., §

EMC CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

The Court hereby sets and directs the parties, or counsel acting on their behalf, to appear by

phone for a telephone conference on December 07, 2020 at 10:00 AM . Please call (866) 434-5269

with access code 9678090 to be included in the hearing.

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 56 Filed 12/03/20 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Spectrum Control, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited)
at August 31, 1999 and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited)
for the nine months ended August 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to its Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 1999
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000092769
<NAME> SPECTRUM CONTROL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                              82
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    18952
<ALLOWANCES>                                       577
<INVENTORY>                                      23295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 42583
<PP&E>                                           40482
<DEPRECIATION>                                   19488
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   78498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            17950
<BONDS>                                          20270
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         14548
<OTHER-SE>                                       23244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     78498
<SALES>                                          68758
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 68758
<CGS>                                            49261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    49261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6404
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2434
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3970
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3970
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5279 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5279

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain portable personal area 
                          mosquito repellents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Petri introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain portable personal area 
                          mosquito repellents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PORTABLE PERSONAL AREA MOSQUITO REPELLENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Continuous action,  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        self-contained,                                                    31/2015.......
                        refillable, fan-
                        motor driven,
                        battery-operated,
                        portable personal
                        area mosquito
                        repellents
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8414.59.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 12(b)


          UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY
                              AND AFFILIATE COMPANIES

              COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Six Months Ended June 30,
Millions of Dollars Except Ratios                       1999           1998
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>            <C>
Earnings:
   Net Income (Loss).................................   $355           $(154)
   Undistributed equity earnings.....................    (19)            (19)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Total.............................................    336            (173)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income Taxes.........................................    175            (123)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense including amortization
      of debt discount...............................    311             282
   Portion of rentals representing an
      interest factor................................     90              88
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Total.............................................    401             370
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings Available for Fixed Charges.................    912              74
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed Charges -- as above............................   $401           $ 370
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (Note 6)..........    2.3             0.2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1*****Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***In connection with the Quarterly Report of American States Water Company and Southern CaliforniaWater Company (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Floyd E. Wicks, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant./s/ Floyd E. WicksFloyd E. Wicks
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 31.02

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Doug Hanson, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Windrose Medical
Properties Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have;

         a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
                  that material information relating to the registrant,
                  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
                  by others within those entities, particularly during the
                  period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
                  controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
                  the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date");
                  and

         c)       Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
                  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
                  on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions);

         a)       All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
                  internal controls which could adversely affect the
                  registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
                  financial data and have identified for the registrant's
                  auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
                  or other employees who have a significant role in the
                  registrant's internal controls.

Date: March 15, 2004

                                      /s/ Doug Hanson
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 12




                  SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        Computation of Ratios of Earnings
                   From Continuing Operations to Fixed Charges
                              Total Enterprise (a)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Six Months Ended June 30,                        Years Ended December 31,


                                            1999           1998            1998        1997         1996         1995        1994
                                            ----           ----            ----        ----         ----         ----        ----

                                                                                               (In Thousands)


Earnings from Continuing Operations:
<S>                                       <C>           <C>             <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>
   Income before income taxes             $77,419       $ 97,059        $168,177    $170,227     $150,219     $134,124    $ 76,098
   Fixed charges (see computation below)   22,020         19,645          42,326      34,785       43,028       48,779      47,575
                                          -------       --------        --------    --------     --------     --------    --------
Total Earnings Available for Fixed
   Charges                                $99,439       $116,704        $210,503    $205,012     $193,247     $182,903    $123,673
                                          =======       ========        ========    ========     ========     ========    ========


Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense before deducting
      interest capitalized                $20,927       $ 18,573        $ 40,369    $ 33,130     $ 41,147     $ 46,859    $ 45,900
   Rentals(b)                               1,093          1,072           1,957       1,655        1,881        1,920       1,675
                                          -------       --------        --------    --------     --------     --------    --------
                                          $22,020       $ 19,645        $ 42,326    $ 34,785     $ 43,028     $ 48,779    $ 47,575
                                          =======       ========        ========    ========     ========     ========    ========


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges            4.5            5.9             5.0         5.9          4.5          3.7         2.6
                                          =======       ========        ========    ========     ========     ========    ========
</TABLE>




----------------

(a)   Amounts include the  Company's  portion of the  captions as they relate to
      persons accounted for by the equity method.

(b)   These  amounts  represent 1/3 of rentals  which  approximate  the interest
      factor  applicable to such rentals of the Company and its subsidiaries and
      continuing unconsolidated affiliates.
WACO

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

CIVIL NO:

vs. WA:20-CV-00454-ADA

ORDER SETTING MARKMAN HEARING

Waco 03/04/2021 01:30 PM

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

10/01/2020

Alan D Albright

IT IS SO ORDERED this

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

§

§

§

§

§

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

MARKMAN HEARING in District Courtroom #1, on the Third Floor ofthe United States

Courthouse, 800 Franklin Ave, Waco, TX, on Thursday, March 04, 2021 at 01:30 PM.

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 29 Filed 10/01/20 Page 1 of 1
#### DEAN v. STATE.

No. 25126.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 31, 1951.

Rehearing Denied March 21, 1951.

Burks & McNeil, by Clifford W. Browny Lubbock, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of fifty dollars.

Two highway patrolmen, while cruising,, noticed appellant’s panel truck weaving on the highway. They had some difficulty in bringing appellant to* a halt. They testified1 as to their experience in dealing with people under the influence of intoxicants, and that appellant was in such condition. They stated that appellant had a strong odor of alcohol about him, and one of them found a half full bottle of whiskey on the seat of his truck.

Appellant, while testifying, denied that he had had anything to drink on the occasion of his arrest and explained that the erratic appearance of his driving resulted from the roughness of the road.

Appellant in an able brief discussed his two Bills of Exception together. They both complain of that part of the information wherein it recites that the same is predicated “on the written affidavit of Frank Mitchell, a competent and creditable person”.

Appellant urges that such a statement is not essential for a valid information, amounts to a certification that the named affiant is worthy of belief and represents an effort on the part of the State to “bolster” its case.

*315A similar contention was held to be without merit by this Court in Ashley v. State, No. 25,085, Tex.Cr.App., 237 S.W.2d 311.

This being the only question presented, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The question presented in appellant’s motion for rehearing is identical with that first discussed in our opinion on rehearing in Ashley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 237 S.W.2d 311, wherein we overruled appellant’s contention. Further discussion would not be helpful. -

The motion for rehearing is therefore overruled.

Opinion approved by the Court.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6441** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. CLEVELAND LAQUINCY GRIFFIN, a/k/a Q , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr - 00926

- JFA

- 1; 3:10

- cv - 70281

- JFA )

Submitted : May 24, 2012 Decided: May 31, 2012

Before MOTZ and DAVIS , Ci rcuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Cleveland Laquincy Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. John David Rowell, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Cleveland LaQuincy Griffin seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction becaus e the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court ’ s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B ), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russe ll , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court ’ s order was entered on the docket

on April 25, 2011. The notice of appeal was filed on March 8, 2012
. * Because Griffin failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).3 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED