alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5336 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5336

  To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on certain forged ring gear 
 components and certain other parts of crankshafts and connecting rods.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

Mr. Braley of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on certain forged ring gear 
 components and certain other parts of crankshafts and connecting rods.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FORGED RING GEAR COMPONENTS AND CERTAIN OTHER PARTS 
              OF CRANKSHAFTS AND CONNECTING RODS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Forged ring gear    1.5%            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          components                                                        12/31/2015
                          between 12 and 25
                          inches in outer
                          diameter and
                          other parts of
                          crankshafts and
                          connecting rods,
                          of iron or steel
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          7326.19.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Charles M. Weaver, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, News America Debenture-Backed
          Series 2002-9 Trust (the "Trust") and all reports on Form 8-K
          containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report of the Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
          pooling and servicing or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
          reports is included in these reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the Depositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its
          obligations under that agreement.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2006


         /s/ CHARLES M. WEAVER
----------------------------------------
Charles M. Weaver, Senior Vice President
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|Oklahoma Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|Oklahoma Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 70     | 107    | 103    | 181   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 116    | 198    | 121    | 121    | 80     | 72     | 110    | 154    | 169    | 171   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 432    | 1,030  | 1,683  | 1,810  | 3,043  | 2,955  | 4,177  | 5,942  | 5,704  | 4,629 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,855  | 3,381  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### CARROLL v. STATE.

No. 24928.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 14, 1950.

None on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*419WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was charged by complaint and information with the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area. Upon a plea of not guilty, the jury found him guilty and assessed his punishment at a fine of $100.00 and confinement in jail for 20 days.

No statement of facts, hills of exception, or exceptions to the court’s charge are found in the record. All other proceedings appear to be regular. Therefore nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT July Term 2014

HECTOR ROSA , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 1496

[August 27, 2014 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Stephen A. Rapp

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 1998

- CF

- 13522

- AXXXMB

.
Hector Rosa, Mayo, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
We affirm the trial court’s order which summarily denied appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 motion for DNA testing.

We disagree with the State’s position that the motion was barred as successive. Appellant filed a prior motion for DNA testing of different items which was denied and affirmed by this Court on appeal. Rosa v. State

, 881 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). “[A]ppellant sought different relief

.

. . and did not raise ‘substantially the same ground’ as previously raised.” Ochala v. State , 93 So. 3d 1167, 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Rule 3.853(c)(2) provides: “The court shall review the motion and deny it if it is facially insufficient.” The trial court provided no explanation for its denial in this case. The better practice is for the trial court to explain the basis for denial in its order. See Anderson v. State , 627 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 1993); Terry v. Sta te , 970 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Dieudonne v. State , 958 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Without an explanation, the movant may not have a meaningful opportunity to cure the deficiency.2

“Ordinarily, a facially insufficient rule 3.853 motion shou ld be dismissed or denied without prejudice to the refiling of a facially sufficient motion.” Bain v. State , 963 So. 2d 913, 914 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). The State acknowledges that typically our affirmance of a denial like this would be without prejudice to the refiling of a facially sufficient motion. See, e.g.

, Harvey v. State , 925 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Lemay v. State , 921 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

We agree that the motion was facially insufficient because it did not assert that identity was a genuinely disputed issue in this case. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(b)(4). Appellant’s motion alleged that none of his DNA would be found in the victim’s sexual assault kit. He does not explain how, under the circumstances of this case, this would exone rate him or mitigate the sentence that he received.

Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing a facially sufficient motion but only if he can do so in good faith. See Oquendo v. State

, 2 So. 3d 1001, 1005 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (citing Spera v . State , 971 So. 2d 754 , 762 (Fla. 2007)). We caution appellant, and all postconviction movants, that sanctions may be imposed for false, frivolous, or bad faith filing. Oquendo , 2 So. 3d at 1006

- 07.

Affirmed

.

D AMOORGIAN , C.J., L EVINE and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Hotel Outsource Management
      International, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Sigal
      Grinboim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
                /s/Sigal GrinboimSigal
                Grinboim, Chief Financial OfficerHotel
                Outsource Management International, Inc.February
                13, 2007
October 9, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

YANTSEY GONZALES , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00104

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

______ __________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this d ecision certified below for observance.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1071

In re: JOHN DOE,

Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ( 7:95

- cr

- 00076

- H

- 1 )

Submitted : April 24, 2020 Decided: May 28, 2020

Amended: November 4, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

J ohn Doe , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

John Doe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly

delayed ruling on a motion in his criminal case. He seeks an order from this court directing

the district court to act. Our review of the district cour t’s docket reveals that the district

court granted in part and denied in part Doe ’ s motion on March 11, 2020. Accordingly,

because the district court has recently ruled on the motion , we deny the mandamus petition

as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 2

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA-DTG Document 191-3 Filed 05/23/22 Page 1 of 9
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA-DTG Document 191-3 Filed 05/23/22 Page 2 of 9
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA-DTG Document 191-3 Filed 05/23/22 Page 3 of 9
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA-DTG Document 191-3 Filed 05/23/22 Page 4 of 9
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA-DTG Document 191-3 Filed 05/23/22 Page 5 of 9
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA-DTG Document 191-3 Filed 05/23/22 Page 6 of 9
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA-DTG Document 191-3 Filed 05/23/22 Page 7 of 9
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA-DTG Document 191-3 Filed 05/23/22 Page 8 of 9
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA-DTG Document 191-3 Filed 05/23/22 Page 9 of 9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

STANDING ORDER REGARDING

FILING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN PATENT CASES AND REDACTED 

PLEADINGS

As a public forum, the Court has a policy of providing to the public full access to 

documents filed with the Court. Nevertheless, parties in patent cases routinely produce and rely 

on information that is confidential. Therefore, in all patent cases pending before the undersigned, 

the Court hereby grants leave for any party to file materials containing confidential information 

under seal without filing a separate motion seeking leave of the Court to do so. The filing party 

shall file a publicly available, redacted version of any motion or pleading filed under seal within 

seven days. The parties need not file redacted versions of exhibits to such documents. Exhibits 

that are nonconfidential in their entirety should not be filed under seal at all. The parties shall 

coordinate to make sure that the public version filing redacts information that any party deems 

confidential. Redactions should be targeted to redact only that information. The publicly 

available version shall be labeled “PUBLIC VERSION.” Cooperating to file the public version 

shall not be deemed as agreeing that the redacted information is actually confidential. 

This Order shall apply in all patent cases, but shall not require parties to file public 

versions of pleadings filed before the date of this Order. 

SIGNED this ___ day of February, 2021. 

_________________________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12th

FILED

DEPUTY 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BY: ________________________________ February 12, 2021 Reuben Amaro

Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 51 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.7

                                  CERTIFICATION

                          Chase Credit Card Owner Trust
                           Series 2002-4 (the "Trust")

I, Patricia M. Garvey, a vice president in charge of the reports of the
servicing function of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association for the
above-referenced Trust, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the
         Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, for inclusion in
         these reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
         under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon
         my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, and except as
         disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
         under the pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement; and

5.       The report disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
         the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, that is included
         in this annual report.


Date:    March 30, 2004


       /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
------------------------------------
Name:    Patricia M. Garvey
Title:   Vice President
Company: Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Group
Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Periodic Report), Richard (Xuxin) Shao, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

| | By: | /s/ Richard (Xuxin) Shao
| | --- | ------------------------
| |     | Richard (Xuxin) Shao    
| |     | President & CFO         
| |     |                         
| |     | Date: August 29, 2007   

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-11357

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT ALVARADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:99-CR-28-2

- - - - - - - - - -

August 24, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Alvarado appeals his guilty-plea conviction for

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute

1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana. He argues that the trial

court plainly erred in failing to inquire further into his

competency to plead guilty in light of his continuing treatment

for alcohol and drug abuse.

Alvarado’s addiction to narcotics does not per se render him

incompetent to enter a guilty plea. See Jackson v. United

States, 512 F.2d 772, 773 (5th Cir. 1975) (28 U.S.C. § 2255
No. 99-11357

-2-

motion). The record reflects no history of irrational behavior

or any prior medical opinion on competency. During the

rearraignment, Alvarado appropriately answered the court’s

questions regarding his understanding of his plea agreement, the

nature of the charges against him, and the maximum penalty that

he faced. It is also significant that Alvarado’s counsel never

contended during any of the proceedings that Alvarado was

incompetent. Reese v. Wainwright, 600 F.2d 1085, 1092 (5th Cir.

1979). Under these circumstances, Alvarado has failed to show

that the district court plainly erred in failing to inquire

further as to Alvarado’s competency to plead guilty. 

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Group
Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended May 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Periodic Report), Richard (Xuxin) Shao, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

| | By: | /s/ Richard (Xuxin) Shao
| | --- | ------------------------
| |     | Richard (Xuxin) Shao    
| |     | President & CFO         
| |     |                         
| |     | Date: February 19, 2008 

---