alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice
127212 & (50)(53) Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. SHERRY COMBEN, ANTRIM COUNTY Stephen J. Markman, TREASURER, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 127212 COA: 248963 Antrim CC: 02-007860-PS STATE OF MICHIGAN, and DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendants-Appellants,

and

PURE RESOURCES, L.P., DOMINION RESERVES, INC., WOLVERINE GAS AND OIL COMPANY, INC., EUGENIE R. ANDERSON, STEPHEN WARD DEVINE, ELIZABETH PALMER DEVINE, MICHAEL EDMUND DEVINE, SUZANNE LEE DEVINE, WILLIAM W. DUNN, DAVID W. FAY, EDWIN R. FAY, PETER W. FAY, RO BERT A. FAY, ROSAMOND S. FISHER, FREDERICK T. GOLDING, NANCY HAMILTON, LISA MARRIOTT JONES, DAPHNE FAY LANDRY, GEORGE S. LEISURE, JR., PETER R. LEISURE, FLORA NINELLES, MARJORIE S. RICH ARDSON, JAMES W. RILEY, JR., WILLIAM A. RILEY, BARBARA F. ROSENBERG, ELIZABETH
R. P. SHAW, ANN WARD SPAETH, FREDERICK S. STRONG, III, A. W. ROBERT, STRONG REVO CABLE TRUST, and EUGENIE S. KAUFFMAN, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/_______________________________________ __ 2

By order of May 27, 2005, the parties were directed to file supplemental briefs. On order of the Court, the briefs having been filed, the application fo r leave to appeal the August 31, 2004 judgmen t of the Court of Appeals is c onsidered, and it is GRANTED. The parties are directed to in clude among the issues bri efed: (1) whether the state

defendants have standi ng to prosecute this appeal, and (2) whether a lessee of mineral rights who has leased the righ ts from the surface estate own er is (a) entitled to notice in foreclosure proceedings under the General Property Tax Act, MCL 211.78k(5)(e), or (b)

has a “severed” mineral interest that is un affected by foreclosure proceedings involving

the surface estate. The motion to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED.

We invite amicus briefing from intereste d persons and organiza tions, including the Real Property Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan an d the Michigan Oil and Gas

Association.

W EAVER , J., concurs and states as follows:

I concur in the order g ranting leave to appeal, but write separately because it appears unnecessary to include among the issu es to be briefed the question whether the state of Michigan, defendant-appellant, has standing to pursue this appeal.

l1031 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 27, 2005

Clerk
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG-RBF   Document 71-3   Filed 09/21/21   Page 1 of 1
#### REYNOLDS v. STATE.

No. 26680.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 2, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

William H. Scott, Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of theft, a felony, and the punishment is assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

*510The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear to be in regular form.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000

<S>                                                      <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            9-MOS
<CASH>                                                   11,118
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           139,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                             11,910
<INVENTORY>                                              68,062
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        223,910
<PP&E>                                                   80,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                           50,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          331,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   185,326
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                  3,154
<OTHER-SE>                                              105,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            331,259
<SALES>                                                 296,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        296,263
<CGS>                                                   158,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           158,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        105,183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          2,610
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        2,386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          26,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                             10,257
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      16,567
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             16,567
<EPS-BASIC>                                              1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              1.13

<FN>
Note: As per FASB Statement No. 128, earnings per share, "Primary"
is now "Basic"
</FN>




</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2309

_____________________________

AUSHEA WILLIAMS,

Petitioner,

v.

RICKY DIXON, Secretary, 

Department of Corrections,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

July 24, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004); 

Green v. State, 975 So. 2d 1090, 1115 (Fla. 2008).

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Aushea Williams, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.
#### GRIMES v. STATE.

No. 25671.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful transportation of alcoholic liquor in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $500.00.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

The complaint and information appear regular on their face; and nothing being presented for review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### George W. KENNEDY et ux., Appellants, v. WALGREEN DRUG COMPANY OF TEXAS, Appellee.

No. 6077.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

Sept. 25, 1950.

Singleton, Trulove & Edwards, Amarillo, for appellants.

Simpson, Clayton & Fullingim, Amarillo, (Cleo G. Clayton, Jr., Amarillo, of counsel), for appellee.

PITTS, Chief Justice.

This is a companion case to Latimer v. Walgreen Drug Company of Texas, Tex.Civ.App., 233 S.W.2d 209. The transcript and statement of facts are the same in both cases except for the names of the plaintiffs or appellants in the two cases. There is no material difference in the two cases in so far as the facts and law are concerned. The cases were consolidated and tried together in the trial court and the issues are the same in both cases. The cases were consolidated by motion of the parties in this court and the same issues are presented on the same briefs. The opinion handed down today in the case styled Latimer v. Walgreen Drug Company of Texas, applies to all of the issues raised and presented in this case and that case is here referred to for all purposes in so far as this case is concerned.

For all of the reasons stated in the opinion rendered in Bertha Latimer v. Walgreen Drug Company of Texas, the judgment of the trial court in this case is affirmed.
Case 5:20-mj-00643-FB Document 1 Filed 05/07/20 Page 1 of 5
Case 5:20-mj-00643-FB Document 1 Filed 05/07/20 Page 2 of 5
Case 5:20-mj-00643-FB Document 1 Filed 05/07/20 Page 3 of 5
Case 5:20-mj-00643-FB Document 1 Filed 05/07/20 Page 4 of 5
Case 5:20-mj-00643-FB Document 1 Filed 05/07/20 Page 5 of 5
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1572

EDGAR A. HILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (2:06-cv-00032-GMW)

Submitted: June 30, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008

Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph E. Wolfe, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael

McGaughran, Regional Chief Counsel, William B. Reeser, Supervisory

Attorney, Craig B. Ormson, Special Assistant United States

Attorney, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John L. Brownlee, United

States Attorney, Sara Bugbee Winn, Assistant United States

Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Edgar A. Hill appeals the district court’s order

affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny disability benefits.

We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is

supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied.

See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589

(4th Cir. 1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs,

administrative record, and the materials submitted in the joint

appendix, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.

Hill v. Astrue, No. 2:06-cv-00032-GMW (W.D. Va. Apr. 19, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MUHAMMAD AHMAD ABDALLAH :

AL-ANSI, :

:

Petitioner, :

:

v. : Civil Action No. 08-1923 (GK) 

 :

BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., :

:

Respondents. :

ORDER

Based upon an on-the-record conference call with all counsel,

and with the Government taking no position, the Court grants

Petitioner’s request for a continuance, and it is hereby

ORDERED, that there will be a conference call with all counsel

on June 9, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. The Court will expect Petitioner’s

counsel, after consulting with Petitioner, to have made final

decisions about how they wish to proceed on all aspects of the

Complaint filed.

 /s/ 

March 30, 2011 Gladys Kessler

United States District Judge

Copies to: Attorneys of Record via ECF
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5384 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5384

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 11:1.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Ms. Fudge introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 11:1.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASIC VIOLET 11:1.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.25 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Basic Violet 11:1) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Case No. 5D 22

- 554 LT Case No. 2020

- CF

- 008217

- A

- O JAVONTAE DAVIS ,

Appellant ,
v. STATE O F F LORIDA ,

Appellee

. ______________________________/ Decision filed Novem ber 1, 2022 Appeal f rom t he Circuit C ourt for Orange County , Elaine A. B arbour , Judge. Matthew J. M etz , P ubli c Defender, and Allis on A. H avens, A ssistant P ubli c Defender, Day t ona Beac h, f or Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CUR IAM. A FFIRMED.

TRAVER, NARDELLA and WOZNIAK , JJ. , co nc ur.
Exhibit 12(a)

         UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY
                         AND AFFILIATE COMPANIES

              COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                 (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended June 30,
Millions of Dollars Except Ratios                       1999           1998
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>           <C>
Earnings:
   Net Income (Loss).................................   $206          $(122)
   Undistributed equity earnings.....................    (10)           (10)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Total.............................................    196           (132)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income Taxes.........................................     93            (92)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense including amortization
      of debt discount...............................    155            147
   Portion of rentals representing an
      interest factor................................     45             44
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Total.............................................    200            191
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings Available for Fixed Charges.................    489            (33)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed Charges -- as above............................   $200          $ 191
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (Note 6)..........    2.5              -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

HARMONY HAUS WESTLAKE, L.L.C., §

LING ZHOU, and FENGLIN DU, §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-cv-00486

§

PARKSTONE PROPERTY OWNERS §

ASSOCIATION, INC., §

§

 Defendant. §

§

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR TEMPORARY 

RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

On this day came on to be heard Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and 

Preliminary Injunction (the “Motion”). Having considered the Motion, all relevant briefing and 

arguments of counsel, and all evidence presented, the Court is of the view that the Motion is 

meritorious and should be GRANTED. The Court specifically determines that Plaintiffs face a 

substantial threat of irreparable harm in that Defendant’s actions will likely lead to the closure of 

the sober living residence at issue in this matter.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant is 

preliminarily enjoined from enforcement of Defendant’s parking restrictions against Harmony 

Haus until further order of this Court and on collection of fines imposed on the basis of such 

restrictions until further order of this Court. 

DONE THIS _____ day of ________, 2020

__________________________

JUDGE PRESIDING
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 

Defendant.

CASE NO. 6:20-CV-00456-ADA

Jury Trial Demanded

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF CASE WITH PREJUDICE

This Court, having considered the parties’ Joint Stipulated Dismissal of Case with 

Prejudice, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS the following: 

Case No. 6:20-CV-00456 is dismissed with prejudice.

The parties’ claims for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses, if any, shall be preserved until 

resolution of the remaining cases (Case Nos. 6:20-CV-454, -457, -460, -461, -463, -464, and -

465). 

SIGNED this 3rd day of March 2022. 

____________________________________ 

HONORABLE ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 112 Filed 03/03/22 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4980 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4980

        To suspend temporarily the duty on 1.3G grade fireworks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Benishek introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on 1.3G grade fireworks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1.3G GRADE FIREWORKS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1.3G grade          Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          fireworks                                                         12/31/2015
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3604.10.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5452 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 11-Aminoundecanoic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. MEEHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 11-Aminoundecanoic 

acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 11-AMINOUNDECANOIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.49 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 11-Aminoundecanoic acid) is amended— 

7 (1) in the general rate of duty column, by strik8 ing ‘‘2.6%’’ and inserting ‘‘Free’’; and 

9 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

10 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5452 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to goods entered, 

3 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of 

5 this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5267 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5267

       To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4'-Sulfonyldiphenol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Pascrell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4'-Sulfonyldiphenol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4,4'-SULFONYLDIPHENOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        4,4'-               Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Sulfonyldiphenol                                                  12/31/2015
                          (CAS No. 80-09-1)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2930.90.29)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Synergy  Financial  Group,
Inc.(the  "Company")  on Form  10-KSB for the year ending  December  31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the  "Report"),  we, John S.
Fiore,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Ralph A.  Fernandez,  Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                       <C>


/s/John S. Fiore                              /s/Ralph A. Fernandez
-------------------------------------         --------------------------------------------
John S. Fiore                                 Ralph A. Fernandez
President and Chief Executive Officer         Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                 (Principal Financial amd Accpimtomg Officer)


Date: March 26, 2003                           Date: March 26, 2003

</TABLE>