alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 26374.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 22, 1953.

Pat Beadle, Clarksville, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, ninety days in jail and a fine of $150.

Officers, armed with a search warrant, searched the home and premises of the appellant during his absence. They found five pints of whiskey under the floor of a storage room, which was a part of the garage located a few feet from the appellant’s home. ;

Other whiskey was found adjacent to- the barn, but a discussion of the admissibility of evidence thereof will not be necessary because that mentioned above is sufficient to sustain the conviction herein.

We will now discuss the contentions raised by appellant’s counsel in his able brief.

The complaint alleged that the local option election had been held on the 5th day of June, 1952. Appellant objected to the introduction into evidence of the order of the Commissioners Court canvassing the results of the prohibition election, because such order recites that the election was -held on the 5th day of June, 1902, which he contends constitutes a fatal' variance. This exact contention was decided adversely to appellant in the recent case of Rowlett v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 238 S.W.2d 781, 783. There we said:

> “ * * * there being in the information ample allegation that the-prohibition election had been held, canvassed, the result declared and published prior to the commission of the offense charged, then the date on which said election was held was sur-plusage.”

Appellant next contends that the affidavit for the search warrant is insufficient in that it does not appear therefrom that the act or event upon which probable cause was based occurred within a reasonable time antecedent thereto. In the affidavit before us, we find the recitation that the affiants were “this day” informed by a credible person of Red River County “that alcoholic beverages are kept, stored, *116passed and sold in and upon the above described premises in violation of the law.” This is adequate.

We find the description of the location of appellant’s house sufficient.

^pp.ellant complains of the failure of the trial court to give his requested charge on possession. He contends that Nailing v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 498, 203 S.W.2d 221, is authority supporting him. We . do not agree. In the .Nailing case, the illicit liquor was found in a creek bed in a thickly wooded section. There was no testimony as to the possession of the Íaíid upon which the same was found. The instant record is replete with' testimony showing that the appellant lived in the house immediately adjacent to the garage where the whiskey was found.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC.**

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

I,Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AffinityGroup Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify asfollows:
| 1.     |   | This statement is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 in connection with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for  the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Periodic Report”);        |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     |   | The Periodic Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934, as amended; and                                                                          |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 3.     |   | The information contained in the Periodic Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods  indicated therein. |

 

 

Date:  March 20, 2007

 

 
|        | /s/ Thomas F. Wolfe       |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas F. Wolfe           |
|   | Senior Vice President and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

1

----
#### COMBS v. STATE.

No. 25887.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 4, 1952.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for the offense of robbery. The appellant having twice theretofore been convicted of a felony less than capital, his punishment was assessed at confinement for life.

There is neither a statement of facts nor bill of exception in the record brought forward on appeal. All proceedings appear regular and nothing is presented for review by this court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

PARKERVISION, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTEL CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00108-ADA 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORDER 

To narrow the issues in the pending action, Plaintiff ParkerVision, Inc. and Defendant 

Intel Corporation have agreed and jointly moved the Court to enter the following stipulations

(ECF No. 202). 

As a result of the foregoing, the Court ORDERS that each of the following stipulations 

shall be binding on the parties for all purposes in this case: 

 With regard to interviews of Ulrich Klepser and Werner Schelmbauer located in

Europe, Intel and ParkerVision agree not to raise at trial or in motions that the

interview was not taken under oath as a basis for challenging the admissibility

or credibility of statements made at the interview. In addition, Intel and

ParkerVision agree not to reference that the proceedings were interviews instead

of depositions before the fact finder, and further agree not to use the fact that the

proceedings were interviews instead of depositions to challenge the admissibility

of statements from the interviews. To avoid any confusion, the parties agree to

refer to the interview as a "deposition" in front of the fact

finder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, both parties reserve the right to raise the

Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 203 Filed 11/15/22 Page 1 of 2
2 

same objections they could raise with regard to deposition testimony taken in the 

United States with regard to statements made at interviews of witnesses located 

in Europe.

 With regard to deposition hours, each side may take up to 88 hours of testimony

(for both party and non-party witnesses combined);

 With regard to the parties’ final infringement and invalidity contentions, Intel’s

Final Invalidity Contentions shall include Intel’s May 16, 2022 Supplemental Final

Invalidity Contentions and Ex. 66 thereto (Rockwell RF 100 claim chart) and

ParkerVision’s Final Infringement Contentions shall include ParkerVision’s April

11, 2022 Amended Disclosure of Final Infringement Contentions, May 6, 2022

Second Amended Disclosure of Final Infringement Contentions, May 24, 2022

Final Infringement Contentions Related to SMARTi[TM] 4 Family of Products, and

ParkerVision’s June 9, 2022 Supplemental Disclosure of Final Infringement

Contentions Related to SMARTi[TM]4 Family of Products.

SIGNED this 15th day of November, 2022.

Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 203 Filed 11/15/22 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26090]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3440]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Dangerous Curves: The Art of the Guitar''

AGENCY: United States Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
[79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459], the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 [112 Stat. 2681 et seq.], Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999 [64 FR 56014], and Delegation of 
Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999 [64 FR 57920], as amended by 
Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 [65 FR 53795], I 
hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibit, 
``Dangerous Curves: The Art of the Guitar,'' imported from abroad for 
the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are 
of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that the temporary 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Fine 
Arts, Boston, Massachusetts from on or about November 5, 2000, to on or 
about February 24, 2001, is in the national interest. Public Notice of 
these determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, 202/619-5997, and the address is Room 700, 
United States Department of State, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20547-0001.

    Dated: September 29, 2000.
Helena Kane Finn,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United 
States Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-26090 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 May 2006

(2006/C 126/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Randgold Resources Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, D. Mark Bristow, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/ D. Mark Bristow     | 
|----------------------- | 
|D. Mark Bristow         | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|March 28, 2017          |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000092066
<NAME> SOUTHERN ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         163,424
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,903
<PP&E>                                         165,487
<DEPRECIATION>                                 127,220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,826
<BONDS>                                         35,996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       521,347
<OTHER-SE>                                   (365,999)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   202,170
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,045
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               108,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (89,188)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (89,188)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (89,188)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.017)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.017)
        

</TABLE>
#### DIXON v. STATE.

No. 24898.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 25, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary, and upon conviction, his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of "two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. '-All matters of procedure appear regular, and no question has been presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This section contains summary financial information extracted from the Standard
Register Company financial statements for the six months ended July 2, 2000 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                          52,254
<SECURITIES>                                       295
<RECEIVABLES>                                  250,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,094
<INVENTORY>                                    136,490
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               462,194
<PP&E>                                         644,966
<DEPRECIATION>                                 299,106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 970,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,857
<BONDS>                                        202,930
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,224
<OTHER-SE>                                     515,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   970,600
<SALES>                                        634,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               635,322
<CGS>                                          391,980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  597,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,931
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,187
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,699
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,488
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,488
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31


</TABLE>
iN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

DANIEL FREEMAN, § 

PLAINTIFF, § 

§ 

V. § 

§ 

WYDEN STARK, LLC D/B/A § 

GQR GLOBAL MARKETS, § 

DEFENDANT. § 

21 çci 2 A ¶: 5L 

CAUSE NO. 1:20-CV-589-LY 

ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered cause is SET for JURY 

SELECTION AND TRIAL on Monday, October 18, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No.7, on 

the Seventh Floor of the United States Courthouse, 501 West 5th Street, Austin, Texas. 

SIGNED this day of September, 2021. 

TED STAT 

Case 1:20-cv-00589-LY Document 45 Filed 09/21/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 194 (Thursday, October 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25565]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Mojave National Preserve, Advisory Commission; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that a meeting of the Mojave National Preserve Advisory 
Commission will be held on October 17, 2000. The meeting will begin at 
9 a.m. at the Primm Valley Resort in Primm, Nevada.
    The agenda will include updates on park activities, Kelso Depot 
design status, Hole-in-the-Wall Interagency Fire Center design status, 
Comprehensive Interpretive Planning overview, and the status of the 
revised draft General Management Plan.
    The Advisory Commission was established by Public Law 103-433 to 
provide advice on the development and implementation of the general 
management plan for the Preserve.
    Current members of the Commission are: Irene Ausmus, Rob Blair, 
Peter Burk, Donna Davis, Kathy Davis, Gerald Freeman, Willis Herron, 
Eldon Hughes, Claudia Luke, Clay Overson, Norbert Riedy, Mal Wessel.
    This meeting is open to the public.

Dennis Schramm,
Acting Superintendent, Mojave National Preserve.
[FR Doc. 00-25565 Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of Data Call Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, James Ammons, CEO and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ James Ammons

James AmmonsCEO and DirectorDated: April 14, 2008

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Data Call Technologies, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
#### FLORES v. STATE.

No. 26494.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 27, 1953.

L. R. Pearson, Ranger, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for selling whisky in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $150 and 30 days in jail.

The undisputed evidence shows that the appellant acted as the agent of the purchaser in buying the whisky, rather than as the seller of the whisky, as alleged in the information.

.Such facts do not warrant the conviction for selling whisky. Harris v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 233 S.W.2d 123; Branch’s P. C., Sec. 1248.

The state’s attorney before this court confesses the insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, for the reason stated.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the court.
#### GARCIA v. STATE.

No. 26275.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 25, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

■The offense is. driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.

■ The- record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of "the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
      Adopted Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
      connection with this annual report
      on Form 10-KSB of Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings, Inc., I, Thomas E. Tuck,
      Chief Executive Officer of Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings, Inc., certify,
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




1. The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
      information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Tennessee Valley Financial
      Holdings, Inc.








Date:  January
                16, 2008
            
            /s/
                Thomas E.
                TuckThomas
                E. TuckPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer