60176 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 10, 2000 / Notices

provided in the following OMB

circulars:

A–21 Cost principles applicable to grants,

contracts, and other agreements within

institutions of higher education.

A–87 Cost principles applicable to grants,

contracts, and other agreements with

State and local governments.

A–102 Uniform administrative requirements

for grants in aid to State and local

governments, and the common rule.

A–110 Grants and agreements with

institutions of higher education,

hospitals and other nonprofit

organizations.

A–122 Cost principles applicable to grants,

contracts, and other agreements with

nonprofit organizations.

A–133 Audits of States, Local Governments

and Non-Profit Organizations.

BPA’s solicitations include notice of

applicability and availability of the BPI

and the BFAI, as appropriate, for the

information of offerors on particular

purchases or financial assistance

transactions.

Issued in Portland, Oregon, on September

26, 2000.

Kenneth R. Berglund,

Manager, Contracts and Property

Management.

[FR Doc. 00–25923 Filed 10–6–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP00–591–000]

ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of

Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

October 3, 2000.

Take notice that on September 29,

2000, ANR Pipeline Company (‘‘ANR’’)

tendered for filing, as part of its FERC

Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No.

1, the Fourth Revised Sheet No. 45E.01,

to be effective November 1, 2000.

ANR states that the purpose of this

filing is to designate in its tariff a new

point eligible for service under its

existing Rate Schedule IPLS.

ANR states that copies of the filing

have been mailed to all affected

customers and state regulatory

commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Sections

385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission’s

Rules and Regulations. All such motions

or protests must be filed in accordance

with Section 154.210 of the

Commission’s Regulations. Protests will

be considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceedings.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room. This filing may be viewed on the

web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/

rims.htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance).

David P. Boerger,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–25854 Filed 10–6–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP00–589–000]

ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of

Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

October 3, 2000.

Take notice that on September 29,

2000, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR)

tendered for filing, as part of its FERC

Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No.

1, the following sheets to be effective

October 1, 2000.

Primary Proposal

Forty-fourth Revised Sheet No. 8

Forty-fourth Revised Sheet No. 9

Forty-third Revised Sheet No. 13

Fifty-third Revised Sheet No. 18

Alternate Proposal

Alternate Forty-fourth Revised Sheet No. 8

Alternate Forty-fourth Revised Sheet No. 9

Alternate Forty-third Revised Sheet No. 13

Alternate Fifty-third Revised Sheet No. 18

ANR states that this filing is being

submitted by ANR for the purpose of

recovery certain gas supply realignment

(GSR) costs incurred as a result of

restructuring under Order No. 636. This

filing includes both a primary and an

alternative set of tariff sheets. In its

primary case, which is ANR’s preferred

case, ANR seeks to implement a GSR

surcharge of $0.007, applicable to each

Dth of MDQ, over a three (3) year

period. In the alternative case, ANR

proposes to collect a GSR surcharge of

$0.018 per Dth over a 1 year period,

resulting in lower interest costs to its

customers, and a lower overall recovery

amount.

ANR states that copies of the filing

have been mailed to each of ANR’s

Second Revised Volume No. 1

customers, and interested State

Commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Sections

385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission’s

Rules and Regulations. All such motions

or protests must be filed in accordance

with Section 154.210 of the

Commission’s Regulations. Protests will

be considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceedings.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room. This filing may be viewed on the

web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/

rims.htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–25858 Filed 10–6–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP00–596–000]

Colorado Interstate Gas Company;

Notice of Tariff Filing

October 3, 2000.

Take notice that on September 29,

2000, Colorado Interstate Gas Company

(CIG), tendered for filing to become part

of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised

Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in

Appendix A to the filing, to be effective

March 27, 2000.

CIG states that tariff sheets reflect the

change in Right-of-First Refusal

provisions permitted by the

Commission’s Order No. 637, 637–A

and 637–B (collectively referred to as

Order No. 637). Specifically, effective

on or after March 27, 2000, the firm

shipper’s contract must be for service

for twelve consecutive months or more

at applicable maximum rate for that

service, except that a contract for more

than one year, for a service which is not

available for 12 consecutive months,

would be subject to the Right-of-First

Refusal.

CIG also states it is making some

clarifications concerning incremental

rates and a shipper not having the right