alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

DELL INC., AND EMC 

CORPORATION,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00473-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00474-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00475-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00476-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00477-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00478-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00479-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00480-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00481-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00482-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00485-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00486-ADA

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE REGARDING 

EXCHANGE OF CLAIM TERMS FOR CONSTRUCTION

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s Version 3.2 of the Court’s Order Governing proceedings entered 

November 9, 2020, and in accordance with the Court’s Scheduling Order, Plaintiff hereby notifies 

the Court Plaintiff has served its proposed claim terms for construction on Defendants Dell 

Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., and EMC Corporation via electronic mail on January 6, 2021. 

Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 75 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 2
Date: January 6, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Mark D. Siegmund_____ 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered 

electronically via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, 

on this the 6th day of January 2021.

/s/ Mark D. Siegmund

Mark D. Siegmund

Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 75 Filed 01/06/21 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 99

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Union Pacific
Railroad Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Richard K. Davidson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|    |  |                                | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------ | 
|By: |  | /s/ Richard K. Davidson        | 
|    |  |                                | 
|    |  | Richard K. Davidson            | 
|    |  | Chairman and                   | 
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer        | 
|    |  | Union Pacific Railroad Company | 

May 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Union Pacific
Railroad Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, James R. Young, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|    |  |                                | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------ | 
|By: |  | /s/ James R. Young             | 
|    |  |                                | 
|    |  | James R. Young                 | 
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer        | 
|    |  | Union Pacific Railroad Company | 

May 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Graphic Omitted]
    [NUMBER]                                                         [SHARES]
               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA



                             ONLINE PROCESSING, INC.

The Corporation is authorized to issue 25,000,000 Common Shares-Par Value $0.001
each


                                    SPECIMEN
This Certifies that ___________________________________________  is the owner of
_______________________________________________________________   fully paid and
non-assessable  Shares  of  the  above  Corporation  transferable  only  on  the
books of  the Corporation by  the holder hereof in person or  by duly authorized
Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

In Witness  Whereof,  the said  Corporation  has caused this  Certificate  to be
signed by its duly  authorized  officers  and to be sealed  with the Seal of the
Corporation.

Dated____________________


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Arkansas Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Arkansas Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1     
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 3      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 1      | 1      | 2      | 1     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 3      | 3      | 2      | 4      | 2      | 2     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 2      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 2      | 1      | 2      | 2      | 1      | 1      | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-579-000]

Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. (Iroquois) tendered for filing its Deferred Asset Surcharge report covering the period commencing November 1, 2000.

Iroquois states that this report is filed pursuant to part 154 of the Commission's regulations and section 12.3 of the General Terms and Conditions of its tariff. Iroquois further states that the report reflects no change in the Deferred Asset Surcharge for the period commencing November 1, 2000.

Iroquois states that copies of its filing were served on all jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before October 11, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-25839  Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the annual report of TraceGuard Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ending December 31,
        2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the “Report”), I, David Ben-Yair, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, that:
 
 (3)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (4)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 
 Date:
                  April 28, 2008
              By:**/s/
                  David Ben-YairDavid
                  Ben-YairChief
                  Financial Officer
  
  This
        certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        with
        this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
        shall
        not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company
        for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange of 1934, as amended,
        or
        otherwise subject to the liability of that
        section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             902
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,653
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,251
<PP&E>                                         143,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                (33,326)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,340
<BONDS>                                         41,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           129
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,779
<SALES>                                         11,856
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,897
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (312)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (686)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (686)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
1 

US 8609673 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

NCS MULTISTAGE INC.,

NCS MULTISTAGE, LLC,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NINE ENERGY SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant. 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00277-ADA 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

DEFENDANT NINE ENERGY SERVICE, INC.’S 

THIRD RULE 50(A) MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW 

Defendant Nine Energy Service, Inc. (“Nine”) hereby submits this motion for judgment as 

a matter of law under Federal Rule of Procedure 50(a). Claims 28 and 29 of the U.S. Patent No. 

10,465,445 (the “’445 Patent”) are anticipated by the TCO TDP-PO Plug. A prior art reference 

anticipates a patent’s claim under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) if the prior art “discloses each and every 

element of the claimed invention arranged or combined in the same way as the claim.” Monsanto 

Tech. LLC v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 878 F.3d 1336, 1342-43 (Fed. Cir. 2018). 

The TCO TDP-PO Plug discloses each of the elements of Claims 28 and 29. Dr. Meehan 

testified the TCO TDP-PO Plug includes the limitations of claims 28 and 29. Rough TR 635:16-

636:29. Dr. Meehan understood and explained that the TCO TDP-PO tool is configured for casing 

string, and Dr. Meehan has personal experience using casing smaller than 4.5 inches. Rough TR 

609:6-25; 613:15-19. Dr. Rodgers disagrees that the TCO TDP-PO tool was configured for casing 

string because of the size of the tool, but nothing in this court’s construction of casing string 

requires a minimum size for the tool to be configured for casing. Rough TR 777:7-12; 779:14-19. 

Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 239 Filed 01/21/22 Page 1 of 3
2 

US 8609673 

The patent examiner was not aware of the TCO TDP-PO Plug at the time the ’445 Patent was 

issued. Rough TR 605:18-25. Accordingly, Nine has established that Claims 28 and 29 are 

anticipated as a matter of law. 

Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 239 Filed 01/21/22 Page 2 of 3
3 

US 8609673 

Dated: January 21, 2022 Respectfully submitted, 

VINSON & ELKINS LLP 

 /s/ Hilary L. Preston 

Hilary L. Preston 

Texas Bar No. 24062946 

hpreston@velaw.com 

Jeffrey T. Han 

Texas Bar No. 24069870 

jhan@velaw.com 

Corbin J. Cessna 

Texas Bar No. 24120753 

ccessna@velaw.com 

Erik Shallman 

Texas Bar No. 24113474 

Ethan Nutter 

Texas Bar No. 24104988 

enutter@velaw.com 

VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P. 

2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100 

Austin, TX 78746 

Telephone: +1.512.542.8400 

Fax: +1.512.542.8612 

Parker D. Hancock 

Texas Bar No. 24108256 

phancock@velaw.com 

VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P. 

1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2500 

Houston, TX 77002-6760 

Telephone: +1.713.758.2222 

Fax: +1.713.758.2346 

Attorneys for Defendant Nine Energy 

Service, Inc. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on the 21st day of January 2022, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing document was served on all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Hilary L. Preston

Hilary L. Preston 

Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 239 Filed 01/21/22 Page 3 of 3
August 25, 2021

YVONNE SANCHEZ §

Plaintiff §

V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-20-CV-0551-OLG

§

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. §

Defendant §

Dear Counsel, 

I have been made aware by Chief Judge Orlando Garcia that he presided over the above-mentioned case, and 

owned stock in the defendant’s company in a sum not greater than $10,000.00. However, his ownership of this stock 

neither affected nor impacted his decisions in the case. Had he known of his stock ownership at the time the case 

was assigned to him, he would have recused himself or divested his ownership of the stock as required by the Code 

of Conduct for U.S. Judges. Included below are the Committee on Code of Conduct Advisory Opinion Number 71 and 

69.

Advisory Opinion 71 provides the following guidance for addressing disqualification that is not discovered 

until after a judge has participated in a case:

“A judge should disclose to the parties the facts bearing on disqualification as soon as those facts are learned, 

even though that may occur after entry of the decision, the parties may then determine what relief they may seek and 

a court (without the disqualified judge) will decide the legal consequence, if any, arising from the participation of the 

disqualified judge in the entered decision.”

Although Advisory Opinion 71 contemplated disqualification after a Court of Appeals oral argument, the 

Committee further explained similar considerations would apply when a judgement was entered in a district court by 

a judge, and it is later learned that the judge was disqualified. On the other hand, in part, Advisory Opinion 69 

provides:

“Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Canon, if a judge to whom a matter has been assigned 

would be disqualified because of a financial interest in a party (other than and interest that could be substantially 

affected by the outcome, disqualification is not required if the judge (or the judge’s spouse or minor child) divests the 

interest that provided the grounds for the disqualification.”

JEANNETTE J. CLACK

CLERK OF COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS PHILIP J. DEVLIN

727 East Cesar E. Chavez Blvd., Suite A500 CHIEF DEPUTY

San Antonio, Texas 78206

Case 5:20-cv-00551-OLG Document 18 Filed 08/25/21 Page 1 of 2
With Advisory Opinion 71 and 69 in mind and given that Chief Judge Garcia neither disqualified himself nor 

divested his interest in the stock during the pendency of the case, you may respond to Chief Judge Garcia’s disclosure 

of this potential case conflict. Should you wish to respond please submit your response no later than 10 (ten) days 

from the date of this correspondence. Any response received will be reviewed by a judge independent of Chief Judge 

Garcia. 

Sincerely,

/s/ Jeannette Clack

Jeannette Clack

Clerk of Court 

Case 5:20-cv-00551-OLG Document 18 Filed 08/25/21 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC 

vs. 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., ET AL. 

MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

Comes now Nathaniel R. Scharn applicant herein, and 

moves this Court to grant admission to the United States District Court for the Western District of 

Texas pro hac vice to represent Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., and EMC Corp. in this case, 

and would respectfully show the Court as follows: 

1. Applicant is an attorney and a member of the law firm ( or practices under the name of)

2. 

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP with offices at:

Mailing address: 3 161 Michelson Drive

City, State, Zip Code: _

Irv_in_

e _

, _

C _

A_9_

2 _

6 _

12 ______________ _

Telephone: 949-451

-

3994 Facsimile: 9 __4_9-_4_5_

1

-_4_69_4 ____ _

Since December 1, 2015 Applicant has been and presently is a

member of and in good standing with the Bar of the State of _C_

a_lifo__rn_

1_· a ____ _

Applicant's bar license number is _

30_5__

83_

6 ______________ _

3. Applicant has been admitted to practice before the following courts:

Court: Admission date: 

U.S.C.O.A., Federal Circuit December 1 1, 201 7 

U.S.D.C., E.D. California November 6, 2019 

U.S.D.C., C.D. California November 20, 2019 

Case No.: 6:20-CV-475-ADA 

Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 118 Filed 11/11/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 118 Filed 11/11/21 Page 2 of 4
100

Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 118 Filed 11/11/21 Page 3 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC 

vs. Case No.: 6:20-CV-475-ADA 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., ET AL. 

ORDER 

BE IT REMEMBERED on this day, there was presented to the Court the Motion for 

Admission Pro Hae Vice filed by _

N_ath__an_ie_l_R_._S_c_h__arn __________ _., counsel for

-----------------� and the Court, having reviewed the motion, enters 

the following order: 

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Admission Pro Hae Vice is GRANTED, and 

_Na_th__an_ie_l_R_._S_ch_________ arn may appear on behalf of ____________ _

in the above case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ________________ 

Nathaniel R. Scharn _, if he/she 

has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S.

District Court, in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-l(f)(2). 

SIGNED this the ____ day of November

UNI TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00475-ADA Document 118 Filed 11/11/21 Page 4 of 4