alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7461

DAVID BRIGHTWELL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
MCI

- J WARDEN J. PHILLIP MORGAN; COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION O. WAYNE HILL; F. TODD TAYLOR, Executive Director of the IGO; ROBIN WOOLFORD, Deputy Director of the IGO; AUDREY BROWN, Administrative Officer II, Inmate Grievance Office; C.O. II KELLEN KRANICH, a/k/a Bobby Hill; SGT. ABIODUN ADAMOLEKUN; ROBERT DEAN, Security Chief; SGT. SHEILA SCHMITT, Institutional Administra tive Remedy Procedure Coordinator for MCI

- J; MAJOR SHANEA ROSS, formerly Captain , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv
- 03807

- RDB )

Submitted : February 25, 2021 Decided: March 2, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN , Circuit Judge , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
David Brightwell, Appellant Pro Se.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: David Brightwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brightwell v. Morgan , No. 1:18

- cv
03807

- RDB (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2020). We also deny Brightwell’s motion for appointment
of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contention s are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification**

I, SimonBraeutigam, certify that: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Chase Issuance Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided underForm 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 
 4.
Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 ofRegulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

 
 5.
All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certificationabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. 

Date: March 30, 2020 

 
By: /s/ Simon BraeutigamName: Simon BraeutigamTitle: 
Chief Executive Officer

(senior officer ofChase Card Funding LLC in charge of securitization)
**
June 9, 2014

Mr. Anthony Costa

Sr. Quality Manager

Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation

P.O. Box 2206

Savannah, GA 31402-2206

Dear Costa:

We have received your May 28, 2014 correspondence submitted to the Federal Docket

withdrawing your January 14, 2014 petition on behalf of Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation 

for an exemption from § 145.107(a)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

Your letter has been placed in the public docket No. FAA-2014-0028. No further action will 

be taken on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda D. Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Zone 4 Play, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, as
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

     Dated: March 30, 2007

                                                             /s/ Shimon Citron
                                                             -----------------
                                                             Shimon Citron
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Edward F. Lonergan, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Diversey, Inc.; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                         
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 2, 2010 |  | /s/ Edward F. Lonergan                                  
|                   |  | Edward F. Lonergan
President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

PATRICK WOOD CRUSIUS,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

EP-20-CR-00389-DCG

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE BRIEF

On November 2, 2023, the United States filed a Motion to Unseal certain documents in 

the above-captioned case.

1

 In a prior Order, the Court vacated Local Rule CR-47(b)’s 11-day 

deadline due to the Court’s designation of this case as “complex.”2 Notwithstanding that Order, 

the Court orders Defendant to respond to the United States’ Motion to Unseal. 

Furthermore, on November 21, 2023, non-party El Paso Matters filed a Motion for Leave 

to file a Motion to Intervene and Unseal Judicial Records.

3

 So far, neither Defendant nor the 

United States has weighed in on either of El Paso Matters’ motions. Before the Court rules on El 

Paso Matters’ motions, the Court wants to provide the parties with an opportunity to respond. 

The Court thus orders the parties to respond and file any objections to El Paso Matters’ motions.

4

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Defendant to RESPOND to the United States’ Motion 

to Unseal by March 8, 2024. If Defendant does not respond, the Court will assume it is 

1 Mot. Unseal, ECF No. 308. 

2 Order, ECF No. 90 (“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Local Rule CR-47(b) of the Local 

Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas is VACATED in this case 

pursuant to the Court’s oral order on February 14, 2020, until further order from the Court.”). 

3 Mot. Leave, ECF No. 311; Mot. Intervene & Unseal, ECF No. 311-2. 

4 To be clear, the Court would like the parties to respond to El Paso Matters’ Motion for Leave 

and its Motion to Intervene and Unseal Judicial Records. See Mot. Leave; Mot. Intervene & Unseal. 

Case 3:20-cr-00389-DCG Document 313 Filed 02/23/24 Page 1 of 2
unopposed to the relief sought and the Court will consider granting the United States’ Motion as 

unopposed.5

The Court further ORDERS Defendant and the United States to RESPOND to El Paso 

Matters’ motions (ECF Nos. 311 and 311-2) by March 8, 2024. If the Court does not receive a 

response by that date, the Court will assume the parties are unopposed to the motions.

6

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 23rd day of February 2024.

____________________________________

DAVID C. GUADERRAMA

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

5 W.D. TEX. L.R. CR-47(b) (providing that a response is required within 11 days of the service of 

a motion, “if a party opposes a motion” (emphasis added)); cf. W.D. TEX. L.R. CV-7(d)(2) (providing, in 

the civil context, that if no response is filed, “the court may grant the motion as unopposed”).

6 Id.

Case 3:20-cr-00389-DCG Document 313 Filed 02/23/24 Page 2 of 2
#### Ex parte WYNN.

No. 26533.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 24, 1953.

Malcolm W. Tisdel, Plainview, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Justice.

In his application for a writ of habeas corpus to this court, the relator seems to have been charged with a violation of Article 1436c, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., which denounces the theft of engines, motors, water-well pumps or batteries used for irrigation or watering purposes, etc., and fixes the punishment by confinement in the penitentiary for not less than one year and not more than two years, or by imprisonment in jail not to exceed one hundred days, or by fine not to exceed two hundred dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment in jail.

This statute is found in the Acts of the 52nd Legislature, Regular Session, 1951, at page 600. The caption thereof reads as follows:

> “An Act making it unlawful to steal any internal combustion engine, electric motor, water well pump or battery used for irrigation or livestock watering purposes or any accessorial part of any such engine, motor, pump or battery; making such offense a felony or a misdemeanor ; prescribing punishment therefor; and declaring an emergency.”

We have heretofore held in the case of Redding v. State, 109 Tex.Cr.R. 551, 6 S.W.2d 360, that no offense can be both a felony and a misdemeanor, and that the taking of any chicken or turkey denounced as a felony or misdemeanor would be viola-tive of Section 35 of Article 3 of our State Constitution, Vernon’s Ann. St. See also Albrecht v. State, 8 Tex.Cr.App. 216, and Nichols v. State, 32 Tex.Cr.R. 391, 403, 23 S.W. 680.

Article 47 of the Penal Code reads in part as follows:

> “An offense is an act or omission forbidden by positive law, and to which is annexed, on conviction, any punishment prescribed in this Code. An offense which may — not must — be punishable by death or by confinement in the penitentiary is a felony; every other offense is a misdemeanor.”

The relator is charged herein with violating an article of the statute which is denominated as both a felony and a misdemeanor. This is not permissible under the Constitution and laws of the State. It must be either one or the other. Therefore,, we think that the relator is entitled to his discharge under the writ of habeas corpus, he being held under an indictment charging *192both a felony and a misdemeanor in the same count for the same offense. Such Article 1436c, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., thus offends against the Constitution and is void.

The relator is therefore ordered discharged from further restraint under the present indictment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 60671)    
The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than October 26, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (D. Michael Manies, Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                 

*1. JPM Trust II,*                     Okemah, Oklahoma; to retain voting shares of OK Bancorporation, Inc., Okemah, Oklahoma, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of The Okemah National Bank, Okemah, Oklahoma.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 6, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-26228 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 14

Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 44-16 Filed 11/04/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 44-16 Filed 11/04/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 44-16 Filed 11/04/20 Page 3 of 3
DATA SHEET

Mikro-Pulsaire Bin Vent

Economical, compact dust

collector for bins and

material receivers.

Two Basic Styles

• A Style with plenum only; bags

hang directly in the receiver.

• B Style includes plenum and

housing. Size ranges from four to

ten feet.

Features

• Shipped completely assembled for

rapid installation.

• Simple design for easy

maintenance.

• High efficiency: 99.9%

• Filter areas from 25 to 106 ft2

• All headers, pipes, and valves

shipped installed and wired to

solenoid valves and timer.

• Welded 12 gauge carbon steel

construction.

• Operating pressure to 30" w.g. std.

(higher levels available).

• Standard operating temperatures to

200°F.

Delivered with:

• Aluminum venturis

• Stainless steel bag clamps

• 1⁄8" 10 wire carbon steel smooth

retainers

• Compact mounted timer assembly

• Manometer or magnehelic gauge

with fittings ready for installation

• Door in housing (B Style) for easy

side bag removal

• Primed carbon steel surfaces

• NEMA 4 solenoid valve and timer

enclosures

Options

• Stainless steel tube sheet, housing,

and/or venturis

• Special interior or exterior coatings

to your specification

• Explosion proof electricals

• 425°F temperature capability

• Bag grid and/or man grid

• High quality Mikro bags in wide

variety of materials and finishes

• All surfaces that may come in

contact with dust or product can be

fabricated of stainless steel or other

materials

• All surfaces that may come in

contact with gas can be fabricated of

stainless steel or other materials
A member of Beacon Industrial Group

BIM514 5/01 5000

MikroPul Headquarters

4500 Chesapeake Dr.

Charlotte, NC 28216

Tel: 704-998-2600

Fax: 704-998-2601

Customer Service:

800-892-7278

info@mikropul.com

MikroPul Pittsburgh

2591 Wexford-Bayne Road, Suite 202

Sewickley, PA 15143

Tel: 724-934-3910

Fax: 724-934-3934

pittsburgh@mikropul.com

MikroPul Canada, Inc.

245 Matheson Blvd. E., Unit # 10

Mississauga, Ontario L4Z 3C9

Canada

Tel: 905-712-0722

Fax: 905-712-0027

info@ca.mikropul.com

MikroPul, S de RL de CV

Av. Lomas Verdes No. 480-302B

Col. Lomas Verdes

CP 53120 Naucalpan

Edo. de Mexico

Tel: 52-55-5343-8224

Fax: 52-55-5344-5081

info@mx.mikropul.com

Style A

Style B

Mikro-Pulsaire Bin Vent

Model Filter Area Bag length Weight A

ft2 in. lbs. in.

21⁄2A 25 30 100 32

4A 42 48 115 51

6A 63 72 130 75

8A 84 96 145 99

Model Filter Area Bag length Weight A

ft2 in. lbs. in.

21⁄2B 25 30 239 40

4B 42 48 375 58

6B 63 72 461 82

8B 84 96 547 106

NORTH AMERICAN LOCATIONS Visit our web site @ www.mikropul.com for other locations worldwide.

Dimensions are nominal.

Also available as 10A, using 10 ft. long filter bags.

A

24

A

12

24

12

Dimensions are nominal.

Also available as 10B, using 10 ft. long filter bags.
Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 378 Filed 05/19/23 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA), INC.,

ZTE (TX), INC.

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00496-ADA

ORDER SETTING MOTION HEARING HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

MOTION HEARING by Zoomoom on Friday, July 16, 2021 at 11:00 AM.

set

IT 15th day of July, 2021.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**Exhibit 12**

Dated:  June 26, 2006

I, David Balai, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F,and all reports on Form 6-K containing distribution or servicingreports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annualreport, of Permanent Financing (No. 6) PLC, Permanent Funding (No. 1)Limited and Permanent Mortgages Trustee Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information inthese reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distributionor servicing information required to be provided to the trustee by the servicerunder the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in thesereports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annualcompliance statement included in the report and required to be delivered to themortgages trustee in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, orsimilar, agreement and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer hasfulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significantdeficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards based upon the report provided by an independent accountant, afterconducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Programfor Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling andservicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliatedparties: Halifax plc

Date: June 26, 2006

 
| By:                                                      |   | /s/ David Balai |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------|--------|
| Title: Director,  Permanent Funding (No. 1) Limited |   |            |
|                                                          |        |                 |        |  |  |

 

 

----
October 27 , 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
APPROXIMATELY $5520. 00 , Appellant

NO. 14

- 16

- 00705

- CV V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on January 23, 2008. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5456 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5456

 To suspend temporarily the duty on methylated and butylated melamine-
                         formaldehyde polymer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on methylated and butylated melamine-
                         formaldehyde polymer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYLATED AND BUTYLATED MELAMINE-FORMALDEHYDE POLYMER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Methylated and      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        butylated                                                          31/2015.......
                        melamine-
                        formaldehyde
                        polymer (CAS No.
                        68036-97-5)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3909.20.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```