alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.29


 





 


March 14, 2021


 


This document
confirms that HillCour, Inc. (the “Parent”) will provide additional capital as required to Continental Benefits, LLC ("Subsidiary
Company") as further indicated below:


 


		1.	Additional Capital. Parent will provide Subsidiary Company with additional capital,
in a form to be mutually determined, as required to enable Subsidiary Company to fund its working obligations. Such funds will be provided
to the Parent subsidiaries which hold equity interests in Subsidiary Company for contribution to Subsidiary Company. We will support the
Subsidiary Company’s operations as needed through April 30, 2022. Based on the Company’s current projections, we anticipate
the support may be in the range of $6.5 million to $8 million.



		2.	Term and Termination. This commitment is effective as of the date hereof and shall
continue in effect until April 30, 2022.



		3.	Governing Law. The provision of capital shall be made pursuant to and shall be
construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida without giving effect to principles regarding conflict of laws.



		4.	Entire Agreement; Amendment; Waiver. This commitment represents the entire understanding
and agreement among the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and, may be amended, supplemented, or changed, and any
provision hereof may be waived, only by a written instrument making specific reference to this Agreement signed by the party against whom
enforcement of any such amendment, supplement, modification, or waiver is sought.



		5.	Binding Effect. This commitment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
the successors, assigns, heirs and legal representatives of Parent and Subsidiary Company.



 


	  /s/ Damien Lamendola	 
	 	 
	By:	Damien Lamendola	 
	Its	Owner	 



 


4830 W. Kennedy Blvd, Suite 100,
Tampa, FL 33609 ∙ Phone: 863-825-4171
#### Sandra M. Lillard, as Administratrix of the Estate of Lamont C. Lillard, Deceased, Appellant, v Donald F. Carter et al., Defendants. Morris, Cantor, Ziller & Barnes, Non-party Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court, on reargument, properly adhered to its initial determination that the outgoing lawyer’s fee be determined at the conclusion of the case. That attorney unequivocally elected to have his contingent percentage fee determined upon settlement or at trial based on the proportionate share of the work performed on the whole case *(see, Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co.,*73 NY2d 454, 458).

Plaintiff also sought reargument or renewal upon the ground that the outgoing attorney was discharged for cause and was, therefore, not entitled to any fee. That issue was not raised on the initial application and was contrary to the position taken by plaintiff’s incoming counsel on the initial motion. A party may not use a motion to reargue as the vehicle to assert a new issue, particularly where the issue is contrary to the party’s earlier position *(see, Foley v Roche,*68 AD2d 558, 567-568; *De Blasio v Volkswagen of Am.,*124 Misc 2d 726). A motion to renew also was an inappropriate vehicle for this request. Facts essential to a determination whether an alleged conflict of interest existed were divulged on the initial application, and plaintiff has failed to demonstrate why the issue could not have been raised at that time *(see, Foley v Roche, supra).*In any event, the record is devoid of evidence that plaintiff actually discharged the outgoing attorney for cause, and absent evidence that the outgoing attorney acted contrary to plaintiff’s interests, the court properly rejected the effort to deprive counsel of a fee. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J.—renewal.) Present— Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5037 

To suspend temporarily the duty on chocolate crumb imported in bulk 

quantities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. DENT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on chocolate crumb 

imported in bulk quantities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHOCOLATE CRUMB IMPORTED IN BULK QUAN4 TITIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Chocolate crumb imported 

in bulk quantities (provided for in subheading 

1806.20.24) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5037 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6472

HAYWARD LEON ROGERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COLIE RUSHTON,

Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District for the District of South

Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(8:07-cv-00947-MBS)

Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 25, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hayward Leon Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy

Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Hayward Leon Rogers seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rogers has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-272-017]

Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern) tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, proposed to become effective on October 1, 2000:

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 66

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 66C

Northern states that the above sheets are being filed to implement a specific negotiated rate transaction with WPS Energy Services, Inc. in accordance with the Commission's Policy Statement on Alternatives to Traditional Cost-of-Service Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines.

Northern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to  intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the                           ( print page 60420)                        web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26058  Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# CHAMNESS	SURVEYING,	INC

588	SOUTH,	CR	600	WEST	•	ROCKPORT,	INDIANA	47635	• 812-499-4470

**December 15, 2015**

**Petition for exemption/rulemaking**

**As a land surveyor I wish to offer aerial photograp hy from a UAV/drone for a fee. This would in most** 

**all circumstances be located in rural areas on clie nts property. As a land surveyor I deal with the pu**  **blic**

**on a daily basis and am very sensitive to respect t he privacy of not only my clients but also to** 

**adjoining property owners. I respectfully request t his exemption in order that I may offer this servic**  **e to the public.** 

**Thank You**

**Mark Chamness**
**EXHIBIT 11**

**STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS**

Basic earnings per common share of $ 0.80 for the year endedDecember 31, 2006 were calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders of $3.5million for the period January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding of 4,348,128.

Diluted earnings per common share of $ 0.73 for the year ended December 31, 2006 were calculated by dividing net income available to commonshareholders of $3.5million for the period January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 by the weighted-average number of diluted potential common shares outstanding of 4,775,853.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5278 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on propoxur (2-(1- 

methylethoxy)phenol methylcarbamate). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. PASCRELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on propoxur 

(2-(1-methylethoxy)phenol methylcarbamate). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROPOXUR (2-(1-METHYLETHOXY)PHENOL 

4 METHYLCARBAMATE). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.57 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 propoxur (2-(1-methylethoxy)phenol methylcarbamate)) is 

8 amended by striking the date in the effective period col9 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5278 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5112 

To suspend temporarily the duty on copper peptide (GHK-Cu 1:1). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. HIMES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on copper peptide (GHKCu 1:1). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COPPER PEPTIDE (GHK-CU 1:1). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Copper peptide (GHK-Cu 

1:1) (CAS No. 49557–75– 

7) (provided for in subheading 2933.29.90) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5112 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5406 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5406

               To suspend temporarily the duty on Slurry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Mr. Honda introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To suspend temporarily the duty on Slurry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SLURRY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Organic Surface     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Agent                                                             12/31/2015
                          (Slurry)(provided
                          for in subheading
                          3824.90.28)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# T E C H N I C A L M E M O

TMUSA4148052015TM

This document and/or the documents accompanying this facsimile contain information from TURB OMECA, which may be confidential

and/or legally privileged. THE DOCUMENTS ARE INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE ADDRESSEE

IDENTIFIED ABOVE. Any other use, duplication or disclosure of said information remains subject to TURBOMECA prior written consent.

2709 Forum Drive www turbomeca.com Tel : +1 972.606.7600

Grand Prairie, Texas 75052 www.turbomeca

- usa.com Fax: +1 972.606.8166 To: NorthStar Trekking From: Mike Whiteman

Attn: Director of Operations Date: May 20, 2016

Ref: In Flight Shut Down Rate Pages: 1

Re: Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) cc: Bob Snow

Subject : Arriel 2D In Flight Shut Down Rat e

Sir:

The Arriel 2D un

- commanded IFSD rate is as follows;

 D uring the engine design, we predict (in the safety analysis done for the engine certification) the engine un

commanded IFSD rate, is assessed for 2D at 3.10

- 6 failure / engine flight hours (th is means 3 failure for 1

million of hours, that’s to say a Mean Time Between Failure of more than 300 000 hours),

 T he in service experience is followed through airworthiness following (IFSD annual rate assessed for EASA,

and for CAT POL (rate of sudden m ajor loss of power (loss higher than 30% of power)

The Arriel engine fleet data with the MTBUR removal information for the Arriel 2 single engine variants for the year

are calculated over a 12 month period and are based on the amount of hours flown during that 12 months period

divided by the reported engine removals . This information is updated every six months

.

The individual Arriel 2 D fleet flight data for the last 12 month period (June 2014 to June 2015) are a total

accumulated flight time /engine rem ovals based on a total flight hours of 163 000 hours

 MTBR: 3300 hours

 MTBUR: 5900 hours

 MTBF: 11000 h ours

The Arriel 2 single fleet flight data for the last 12 month period (June 2014 to June 2015) are a total accumulated

flight time/engine removals for the Arriel 2 single engine aircraft based on a total flight hours of 630 000 hours

 MTBR: 1600 hours

 MTBUR: 3400 hours

 MTBF: 6500 hours

These number s include all Arriel 2 single engines (Arriel 2B, 2B1, 2B1A, 2D) combined. The information provided is

to s how the Arriel 2D information relative to the global fleet has a higher availability.

Please contact your Field Representative or me directly, should you require any further information.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 16, 2018

NO. 03

- 18

- 00270

- CR

Ex parte Humberto Sanchez Bernal

APPEAL FROM THE 147TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AND BOURLAND

DISMISS ED ON A GREED MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the order denying habeas corpus relief e ntered by the trial court

. The

parties have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, the Court grants the motion, allows

Humberto Sanchez Bernal to withdraw his notice of appeal, and dismisses the appeal. The

appellant shall pay all costs relati ng to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 27 
          - [WT Docket No. 99-168] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction. 

      ( print page 60113)    

# SUMMARY:

This document makes clarifications and corrections to the service rules for the 746-764 and 776-794 MHz bands, as published at 65 FR 3139, January 20, 2000, and at 65 FR 17594, April 4, 2000. 

# DATES:

Effective October 10, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jane Phillips, 202-418-1310. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Commission, in the final rules of the First Report and Order (65 FR 3139, January 20, 2000), and the Second Report and Order, (65 FR 17594, April 4, 2000) inadvertently failed to make specific reference to the definitional criterion for the Gulf of Mexico Economic Area presently set forth in § 27.6(a)(2). 

In rule FR Doc. No. 00-8144 published on April 4, 2000 (65 FR 17594) make the following correction. 

§ 27.6 

1. On page 17602, in the third column, in § 27.6(b)(1) correct “paragraph (a)(1)” to read “paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2)”. 

In rule FR Doc. No. 00-1332 published on January 20, 2000 (65 FR 3139) make the following correction. 

2. On page 3145, in the third column, in § 27.6(b)(2), line 7, after the words “S *ee also”*                         add the phrase “paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section and”.                     

Federal Communications Commission. 

William F. Caton, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-25808 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 37-29 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.1









Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:





a.
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-145390), and


b.
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-157663);





of our reports dated March 4, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.
















New York, New York


March 4, 2011
Exhibit 15.2







CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Randgold Resources Limited

Jersey, Channel Islands

United Kingdom



We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-156150; No. 333-145013 and No. 333-103222) of Randgold Resources
Limited of our report dated 10 March 2017, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Kibali (Jersey) Limited and its
subsidiaries included in Randgold Resources Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2016.



/s/ BDO
LLP



BDO LLP

London, United Kingdom

28 March 2017
#### Harold Reape et al., Appellants, v Conrad J. Lynn, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court, Spodek, J. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Kings County, Spodek, J.—dismiss action.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.