alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY, GILBERTO 

HINOJOSA, Chair of the Texas Democratic 

Party, JOSEPH DANIEL CASCINO, 

SHANDA MARIE SANSING, and 

BRENDA LI GARCIA 

Plaintiff,

v.

GREG ABBOTT, Governor of Texas; RUTH 

HUGHS, Texas Secretary of State, DANA 

DEBEAUVOIR, Travis County Clerk, and 

JACQUELYN F. CALLANEN, Bexar County 

Elections Administrator 

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO.

5: 20-CV-00438-FB

Proposed Order

On this day the Court reviewed Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Exceed the Page Limit for 

their filed motion for Preliminary Injunction and finds that good cause exists to grant the 

extension. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may file a 

Motion for Preliminary Injunction not to exceed 40 pages. These page limits are exclusive of the 

caption, signature block, any certificate, and accompanying documents.

_______________________

The Honorable Fred Biery

U.S. District Judge

Case 5:20-cv-00438-FB Document 11-1 Filed 04/29/20 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/ A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, AND VMWARE, INC., 

Defendants. 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/ A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/ A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

GOOGLE, LLC, 

Defendant. 

Case Numbers: 

6:20-cv-00473-ADA 

6:20-cv-00474-ADA 

6:20-cv-00475-ADA 

6:20-cv-00476-ADA 

6:20-cv-00477-ADA 

6:20-cv-004 78-ADA 

6:20-cv-004 79-ADA 

6:20-cv-00480-ADA 

6:20-cv-00481-ADA 

6:20-cv-00482-ADA 

6:20-cv-00485-ADA 

6:20-cv-00486-ADA 

Case Numbers: 

6:20-cv-00487-ADA 

6:20-cv-00488-ADA 

6:20-cv-00489-ADA 

6:20-cv-00490-ADA 

6:20-cv-00491-ADA 

6:20-cv-00492-ADA 

6:20-cv-00493-ADA 

6:20-cv-00494-ADA 

6:20-cv-00495-ADA 

6:20-cv-00496-ADA 

6:20-cv-00497-ADA 

Case Numbers: 

6:20-cv-00571-ADA 

6:20-cv-00572-ADA 

6:20-cv-00573-ADA 

6:20-cv-00575-ADA 

6:20-cv-00576-ADA 

6:20-cv-00579-ADA 

6:20-cv-00580-ADA 

6:20-cv-00583-ADA 

6:20-cv-00584-ADA 

6:20-cv-00585-ADA 

1

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 147 Filed 01/24/22 Page 1 of 3
WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/ A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant. 

GOOGLE, LLC, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

TERRIER SSC, LLC, 

Respondent. 

GOOGLE, LLC, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

BP FUNDING TRUST, 

Respondent. 

GOOGLE, LLC, 

Petitioner, 

V. 

AQUA LICENSING, LLC, 

Respondent. 

2 

Case Numbers: 

6:20-cv-00725-ADA 

6:20-cv-00726-ADA 

6:20-cv-00728-ADA 

6:20-cv-00730-ADA 

6:20-cv-00783-ADA 

Case Number: 

6:21-mc-01269-ADA 

Case Number: 

6:21-mc-01270-ADA 

Case Number: 

6:21-mc-01309-ADA 

ORDER ON BRIEFING DEADLINES

Pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(d)(2), which states in part: “A response to a discovery or case 

management motion shall be filed not later than 7 days after the filing of the motion,” the Court hereby 

ORDERS that responses to the Motion for Limited-Purpose Consolidation and Protective Order Filed

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 147 Filed 01/24/22 Page 2 of 3
 by Non-Party Subpoena Recipients BP Funding Trust; Basepoint Administrative, LLC; Terrier 

SSC, LLC; and Aqua Licensing, LLC; and Joined by Plaintiff WSOU shall by due no later than 7 days 

from the filing of the motion. The Court FURTHER ORDERS the parties to promptly contact chambers 

at the clerks' email address when the motion is ripe in all of the above-captioned cases.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 24th day of January, 2022.

3 

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 147 Filed 01/24/22 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 23.1           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM    We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of The Standard Register Company for the period ended October 3, 2010, as indicated in our report dated November 10, 2010; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements File No.'s 333-02683, 333-05231, 333-15851, 333-43055, 333-51189, 333-51181, 333-57779, 333-84483 and 333-86492.  We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.    /S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP  Dayton, Ohio November 10, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00456-ADA

ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY DISCOVERY HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

DISCOVERY HEARING by Zoomoom on Thursday, October 07, 2021 at 01:30 PM.

set

IT 6th day of October, 2021.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 84 Filed 10/06/21 Page 1 of 1
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO DIVISION

BRANDON CALLIER,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SUNPATH LTD; NATIONAL CAR CURE 

LLC; NORTHCOAST WARRANTY 

SERVICES, INC.; JOHN DOES #1-4,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

EP-20-CV-00106-FM

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is “Plaintiff’s Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice” [ECF No. 49], filed 

November 6, 2020 by Brandon Callier (“Plaintiff”). Therein, Plaintiff notifies the court that he wishes to 

voluntarily dismiss all claims against Defendant National Car Cure, LLC (“National Car Cure”) with 

prejudice.

1

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), “the plaintiff may dismiss an 

action without a court order by filing . . . a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an 

answer or a motion for summary judgment.” The record reflects National Car Cure has not filed an 

answer in this case.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against National Car Cure, LLC are

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SIGNED AND ENTERED this 9th day of November 2020.

____________________________________

 FRANK MONTALVO

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

“Plaintiff’s Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice” 1, ECF No. 49, filed Nov. 6, 2020.

Case 3:20-cv-00106-FM Document 50 Filed 11/09/20 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          58,143
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  256,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     26,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               404,075
<PP&E>                                       4,720,041
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,478,258
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,336,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          462,061
<BONDS>                                        771,258
<COMMON>                                        87,252
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,414,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,336,900
<SALES>                                        938,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,425,672
<CGS>                                          741,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  917,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               208,161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                283,523
<INCOME-TAX>                                    98,045
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            185,478
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   185,478
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.15
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-383-011]

Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Dominion Transmission, Inc. (DTI) (formerly CNG Transmission Corporation) tendered for filing to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) the following tariff sheet for disclosure of a recently amended negotiated rate transaction.

First Revised Sheet No. 1400

DTI requests an effective date of October 1, 2000, for the negotiated rate.

DTI states that copies of the filing have been served on all parties on the official service list created by the Secretary in this proceeding, DTI's customers, and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call (202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26064 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-97419, No. 333-107337, No. 333-110775, No. 333-110777, No. 333-123617, No. 333-123620, No. 333-137766, No. 333-137767, No. 333-144707, No. 333-144708, and No. 333-144710) on Forms S-8 of North
State Bancorp and subsidiary of our report dated March 23, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of North State Bancorp and subsidiary as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008 which report appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of North State Bancorp for the year ended
December 31, 2008.



|                           |  | 
|-------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC      |  | 
|Greenville, North Carolina |  | 
|March 23, 2009             |  |
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11471 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DARRELL WAYNE SAULS, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas

(4:96-CR-68-A)

July 15, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Darrell Wayne Sauls appeals his sentence following a guilty

plea conviction for money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §

1957. Sauls contends that the district court abused its discretion

when it upwardly departed from the applicable sentencing guidelines

range under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3. As Sauls did not object to the

departure in district court, our review is limited to plain error.

See United States v. Hawkins

, 87 F.3d 722, 730 (5th Cir.), c ert.

denied

, 117 S. C t. 408 (1996). In this case the court’s concern2

that Sauls’ plea agreement understated his involvement in the

offense was quelled by Sauls’ attorney who assured the court that

if the plea agreement was accepted, Sauls could be sentenced to ten

years. Under these circumstances, we find that any error did not

seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of

judicial proceedings. S ee United States v. Calverly

, 37 F.3d 160,

162 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995).

AFFIRMED.
# Living with Impacts from Oil and Gas Industry

Real Americans Fight Poisoning of Their Families 11/3/2015

1

# Ches apeake Energ y We ll Blow Out

U nco nt ro ll ed re l e ase of HA P's a nd 

## VOC's 

# BTEX = 

# Endocrine Disruption

Be nze n e - T o l uen e- Et hy lb e n ze n e- X y l e n e 632 known ch e mica ls 25% l inke d to Can ce r 37% affect Ho rm on es 40-50% linked t o Ki dney, Neurolog i cat I mmune System and Cardiovascu l ar iss u es 75% Sensory Organs, R es p i ratory, Gast rological System "Chemicals can have very negative effects in extremely small quantities," McKenzie said. Lisa McKenzie , an epidemiologist at the Colorado School of Public Health. 11/3/2015

2

# Introduction to Flarin

..... ______ !

When Wasting the gases tail, t he well vents methane into the atmosphere, creating ground level ozone 

# Impacts to Our Community from Flares

If the ce ll s in the plants die, what i s h appening to our ce ll s? 

### 11/3/2015

3

# Methane is over 80 times as potent at trapping solar radiation than 

# C02 SMOG in WY



# What is in the Black Smoke?

Carcinogens- 30%- 70% of Frack Fluid is not recovered, some comes out with the production flare 11/3/2015

4

# Co Benefit of Reducing CH4 Emissions When methane is released from o i l and gas sites , it is emitted with smog and soot formi n g p o llu tants, li ke VOC's and HAP's . Contro llin g methane em i ssion w i ll reduce ozone, which can cause respiratory illnesses, heart attacks, cancer and death . We need the Clean Air Act to cover a l l (new and exist i ng) product ion,

gathering and boosti ng, processing, and storage and transmiss i on m ents of indu 

# Fugitive Emissions, Venting 

# & Radiation Many times we could not see the pollutants but felt them with the headaches, bloody 

# noses, fatigue and every breathe we took 11/3/2015

5
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a )

BRAZOS LICENSING AND )

DEVELEOPMENT, ) Case Nos. 6:20-cv-00487, 00488,

) 00489, 00490, 00491, 00492,

Plaintiff, ) 00493, 00494, 00495, 00496,

v. ) and 00497-ADA

)

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA), INC., )

AND ZTE (TX), INC., )

)

Defendants )

DECLARATION OF YUMING KUANG

The undersigned Declarant, YUMING KUANG, of lawful age, hereby declares, deposes 

and states as follows, under penalty of perjury:

1. I am IPR Counsel for Defendant ZTE Corporation (“ZTE Corp.”) and therefore 

have personal knowledge of the matters asserted in this Declaration.

2. ZTE Corp. has its principal place of business at ZTE Plaza, Keji Road South, HiTech Industrial Park, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518057, P.R. China.

3. ZTE Corp. is a separate company and maintains all corporate formalities 

independently of all other companies (including its direct and indirect subsidiaries), maintaining 

separate books and records, separate bank accounts, and separate assets.

4. ZTE Corp. is a company organized under the laws of China. The books and 

records of ZTE Corp. are maintained outside the United States.

5. ZTE Corp. does not do business in the United States and does not pay any sales, 

property, or other taxes in the United States.

6. ZTE Corp. does not make, use, sell, offer for sale, or import into the United 

States, any products or services (whether for end use, distribution, third-party demonstrations, 

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 26-1 Filed 10/09/20 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

qualification testing, or any other commercial purpose; and whether accused in any of these 

cases or not). 

7. ZTE Corp. does not have any place of business (including without limitation any 

physical place of business, any regular and established place of business, or any place of 

business of ZTE Corp.) within the United States.

8. ZTE Corp. does not own, lease, operate, manage, maintain, or otherwise exercise 

possession or control over any offices, warehouses, stores, servers, storage facilities, distribution 

facilities, manufacturing facilities, or other facilities, or other real property in the United States.

9. ZTE Corp. does not now, and has never before, owned, leased, operated, 

managed, maintained, or otherwise exercised any possession or control over any facility in 

Austin, Texas. The “research-and-development center in Austin, Texas” mentioned in the 2010 

article in the complaints in the above-referenced cases was not a place of business of ZTE Corp. 

10. ZTE Corp. does not advertise or represent that it has any place of business, 

address, or telephone listing in the United States.

11. ZTE Corp. is not registered to do business within the United States.

12. ZTE Corp. established ZTE (USA) Inc. as a subsidiary in 1998 for the purpose of 

marketing, distributing, selling, installing, servicing and supporting telecommunications 

equipment in the U.S.

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 26-1 Filed 10/09/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 26-1 Filed 10/09/20 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *Therm-O-Rock West, Inc.*, Civil No. 00-1849 was lodged on September 28, 2000, with the United States District Court for District of Arizona.                

The consent decree settles claims for civil penalties and injunctive relief against Therm-O-Rock for: civil penalties and injunctive relief pursuant to Section 113(b) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413(b), based on Therm-O-Rock's violations of Subparts A and UUU of the New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”), 40 CFR Part 60. Pursuant to the consent decree Therm-O-Rock will pay a civil penalty of $25,000.

                    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Therm-O-Rock West, Inc.*, DOJ Ref. #90-5-2-1-2233.                

The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the United States Attorney, for the District of Arizona, 230 North First Ave Phoenix, AZ 85025; and the Region IX Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA. A copy of the proposed consent decree may be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, D.C. 20044-7611. In requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $3.00 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Walker B. Smith,

Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 00-25899  Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATE
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS**




This
      Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350
      of
      Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the
      United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other
      purpose.




The
      undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of
      Hartman Commercial Properties REIT (the “Company”), each hereby certify as
      follows:




The
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company (the “Report”), which accompanies this
      Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.




Dated
      this 31st day of March, 2006.






/s/
                Allen R. Hartman
              Allen
                R. Hartman, President
              
              
              /s/
                Terry L. Henderson
              Terry
                L. Henderson, Chief Financial
                Officer







In
      accordance with SEC Release No. 34-47986, this Exhibit is furnished to the
      SEC
      as an accompanying document and is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities
      of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any
      filing under the Securities Act of 1933. A signed original of this written
      statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been
      provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.