alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Victoria Chen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Barnabus Enterprises Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  September 3, 2004 | /s/  Victoria ChenVictoria Chen
President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 21.1**

**OPENENERGY CORPORATIONLIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**
| **Subsidiary**                  | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Organization** | ** ** | **Doing Business As**   | ** ** |
|---------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|------------|-------------------------|------------|
| 2093603 Ontario,  Inc.          |       | Ontario, Canada                  |       | N/A                     |       |
|                            |       |                             |       |                    |       |
| Solar Roofing  Systems, Inc.    |       | Ontario, Canada                  |       | Open Energy Corporation |       |
|                            |       |                             |       |                    |       |
| Barnabus Energy  Inc.           |       | Alberta, Canada                  |       | N/A                     |       |
|                            |       |                             |       |                    |       |
| Connect  Renewable Energy, Inc. |       | Nevada                           |       | Open Energy Corporation |       |
|                            |       |                             |       |                    |       |
| WaterEye  Corporation           |       | Nevada                           |       | WaterEye Corporation    |       |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 5465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2597]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

36 CFR Parts 217 and 219


National Forest System Land and Resource Management Planning

AGENCY:  Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION:  Proposed rule; extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  On October 5, 1999, the Forest Service published a proposed 
rule to guide land and resource management planning on national forests 
and grasslands (64 FR 54074). The agency extended the public comment 
period for this proposed rule, which is scheduled to end on February 3, 
2000 (64 FR 70204). In response to Congressional requests and the need 
to provide the public more time to review and evaluate the proposed 
regulations, the Forest Service is extending the public comment period 
until February 10, 2000.

DATES:  Comments must be submitted in writing and must be received by 
February 10, 2000.

ADDRESSES:  Send written comments on the proposed planning rule to the 
CAET-USDA Team, Attn. Planning Rule, Forest Service, USDA, 200 East 
Broadway, Room 103, Post Office Box 7669, Missoula, MT 59807; or via 
email to planreg/<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bdcad2e2e2dedcd8c9fddbce93dbd8d993c8ce">[email protected]</a>; or via facsimile to (406) 329-
3021.
    Comments, including names and addresses when provided, are subject 
to public inspection and copying. The public may inspect comments 
received on this proposed rule in the Office of Deputy Chief, National 
Forest Systems, Third Floor, Southwest Wing, Yates Building, 14th and 
Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC between the hours of 8:30 AM and 
4:00 PM.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Bob Cunningham, Ecosystem Management 
Coordination Staff, telephone: (202) 205-7820.

    Dated: February 1, 2000.
Barbara C. Weber,
Acting Associate Chief for Natural Resources.
[FR Doc. 00-2597 Field 2-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

AND EMC CORPORATION,

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00476-ADA

DECLARATION OF BRIAN A. ROSENTHAL IN SUPPORT OF

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

Case 6:20-cv-00476-ADA Document 36-1 Filed 10/30/20 Page 1 of 2
1

I, Brian A. Rosenthal, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney permitted to practice law before this Court pro hac vice and am 

licensed to practice law in New York and the District of Columbia. I am a partner with the law 

firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and counsel of record for Defendants Dell Technologies 

Inc., Dell Inc. and EMC Corporation in the above-captioned action. I have personal knowledge 

and/or am directly informed of the matters stated below and, if called, would testify to them under 

oath.

2. Attached here as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of a Workshare-generated 

redline comparison between the October 19, 2020 First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff WSOU 

Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development (“Plaintiff”) and Plaintiff’s June 2, 

2020 Original Complaint For Patent Infringement. This comparison was generated on October 25, 

2020.

3. Attached here as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of a letter sent via e-mail from 

Defendants to Plaintiff on September 30, 2020.

4. Attached here as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the docket report for WSOU 

Investments, LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc., Case No. 6:20-cv-00407-ADA (W.D. Tex.). This 

docket report was retrieved from PACER on October 30, 2020.

5. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: October 30, 2020

/s/ Brian A. Rosenthal___ 

Brian A. Rosenthal

Case 6:20-cv-00476-ADA Document 36-1 Filed 10/30/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I, Bertrand F. Cambou, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Spansion Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
companys most recent fiscal quarter (the companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: | March 13, 2006
|----- | --------------



/s/    BERTRAND F.
CAMBOUBertrand F. Cambou President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5378 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5378

   To suspend temporarily the duty on dimethylisopropylamine (DMIPA).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Fitzpatrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on dimethylisopropylamine (DMIPA).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIMETHYLISOPROPYLAMINE (DMIPA).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Dimethylisopropyla  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          mine (DMIPA) (CAS                                                 12/31/2015
                          No. 996-35-0)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2921.19.6090)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                                          
|View History:                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                              
|Wyoming Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                              
|Wyoming Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 152    | 221    | 313    | 231   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 89     | 302    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD.

# ACTION:

Delete a records system. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy proposes to delete two systems of records notices in its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

# DATES:

The action will be effective on November 6, 2000 unless comments are received that would result in a contrary determination.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to the Department of the Navy, PA/FOIA Policy Branch, Chief of Naval Operations (N09B30), 2000 Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350-2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Doris Lama at (202) 685-6545 or DSN 325-6545.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Department of the Navy's record system notices for records systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                

The Department of the Navy proposes to delete two systems of records notices in its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The deletions are not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system report.

## N07220-7

### SYSTEM NAME:

Travel Pay System (February 22, 1993, 58 Fr 10690).

### REASON:

These records are now under the cognizance of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service. See DFAS system of records notice T7333, Travel Payment System.

## N07431-1

### SYSTEM NAME:

Savings Deposit (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10690).

### REASON:

These records are now under the cognizance of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service. See DFAS system of records notice T7280, Uniformed Services Savings Deposit Program (USSDP).

Dated: October 2, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-25574  Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
#### Rose CADDEN, Appellant, v. James J. CADDEN, Sr., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 29, 1954.

Vincent J. Hargadon, Louisville, for appellant.

J. Walter Clements, Louisville, for ap-pellee.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

In the judgment granting James J. Cad-den, Sr., a divorce from bed and board under KRS 403.050, the Chancellor awarded Mrs. Cadden the custody of their infant son, subject to specified visitation of the *475child by Mr. Cadden/and allowed her $100 per month for the child’s support; ádjudged that Mr. Cadden pay the costs of the action, including the allowance of $1,000 to Mrs. Cadden’s attorney, and awarded Mrs. Cadden the use of certain furniture, furnishings and fixtures which the parties owned at the time of-their separation. The Chancellor dismissed Mrs. Cadden’s petition for *a*divorce “without prejudice to its being amended in due course to seek a divorce for five years’, separation,” and entered a similar order in dismissing Mr. Cadden’s counterclaim for an absolute divorce. The judgment also denied Mrs. Cadden alimony, but retained the action on the docket “for further appropriate proceeding concerning the custody and support of the infant child; for divorce by either party from the other when they have lived apart for five years without cohabitation; and for a settlement of the property rights of the parties.”

On this appeal Mrs. Cadden is insisting that she was entitled to an absolute divorce and alimony, and a settlement of her property rights. Since the applicable rules of law are well settled in this character of case, and the facts are-neither novel nor •of general interest, we shall not set forth the indecorous and multifarious charges made by Mrs. Cadden against her .husband .and certain members of his family. It is sufficient to say that the evidence offered in support of her charges of cruelty against her husband was wholly" insufficient to entitle her to a divorce.

The evidence offered in support of Mr. 'Cadden’s side of the case was amply sufficient for the Chancellor to grant him a divorce from bed and board, and in our opinion, the Chancellor would have been justified in giving him an absolute divorce.

Although Mrs. Cadden was denied alimony, the Chancellor has indicated by the order entered. that he will consider anew the “rights of the parties” when the case comes before him again. We observe that Mrs. Cadden will be benefited to some extent under the sum allowed for the maintenance of her infant son, and will also receive several thousand dollars from funds impounded in court when the Chancellor enters an. order. concerning the settlement of her property rights.

Considering all phases of the case, we think the Chancellor has proceeded to reach an equitable solution of the difficult problems presented by the parties, and at this stage of the case, we find that the Chancellor has not abused his discretion in entering the order appealed from.

Judgment affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 1, 2013

h0325 

# Order

April 1, 2013

145286

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145286

COA: 308278

Oakland CC: 2004

- 195148

- FH

DIONNE DAVON JORDAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2012 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).