alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ZUNIGA v. ZUNIGA.

No. 12349.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 28, 1951.

G. Woodson Morris, San Antonio; for appellant.

Schlesinger, Goodstein & Semaan, San Antonio, for appellee.

W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This is a divorce suit. The trial began to a jury, but after the plaintiff, Benito Zuniga, rested his case the trial court granted defendant, Theresa Zuniga’s motion for an instructed verdict and, based upon the instructed verdict, rendered judgment for defendant, denying the divorce. Benito Zuniga has prosecuted this appeal.

Appellee has not favored ¡us with a brief and accordingly we will accept appellant’s statements as to the record and the evidence as being correct. Gonzales v. Gonzales, Tex.Civ.App., 224 S.W.2d 520. Rule 419, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Appellant sought a divorce on the ground set forth in Sec. 2 of Art. 4629, Vernon’s Ann.Giv.Stats., commonly called “cruel treatment.” Appellant offered evidence if believed which established that:

(1) Defendant had syphilis before and at the time she married plaintiff and withheld same from him;

(2) Defendant constantly picked quarrels with plaintiff;

(3) Defendant threatened to go out with other men.

(4) Defendant insisted on plaintiff’s coming home from a military post 300 miles away every week-end;

(5) Defendant left the domicile provided for by plaintiff;

(6) Defendant refused plaintiff his marital rights with respect to conjugal relations ;

(7) Defendant refused to> cook for and wash military uniforms for plaintiff;

(8) Defendant cursed and used abusive language toward plaintiff;

(9) Defendant has an unusually vile temper;

*271(10) Defendant caused plaintiff’s family mail to be sent to her address;

(11) Defendant admitted that s'he was “no good.”

This proof was sufficient to raise issues which should have been submitted to the jury. The trial judge made no independent finding as to whether or not the evidence was full and satisfactory.

While findings of a jury in a divorce case are advisory only, yet it is the duty of the court, where the evidence warrants, to submit such issues to the jury and secure jury findings on such facts. His failure to do so is reversible error. Baker v. Baker, Tex.Civ.App., 104 S.W.2d 531, 533; Skop v. Skop, Tex.Civ.App., 201 S.W.2d *77.*

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 10.(ii)

                                    AMENDMENT

               Agreement made as of the 6th day of February, 2002 between
Sterling Bancorp, a New York corporation (the "Company") and ______________ (the
"Executive").


                               W I T N E S S E T H

               WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have previously entered in to
a Change in Control Severance Agreement (the "Severance Agreement"); and

               WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the definition of "Change
in Control" in the Severance Agreement to align its effects with the underlying
intent of the Severance Agreement to protect the Executive in the event of a
consummation a Change in Control; and

               WHEREAS, in consideration of Executive's continued employment
with the Company and Executive's receiving a stock option grant from the Company
for calendar year 2002, Executive has agreed to amend the definition of "Change
in Control" in the Severance Agreement.

               NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the parties
hereto agree as follows:

1. Section 4(c) of Appendix A to the Severance Agreement is amended by deleting
the first eight words thereof and inserting the words "of the Company"
immediately following the first appearance of the word "consolidation" therein.

2.      A new Section 4(d) to Appendix A to the Severance Agreement is inserted
which reads:  "Approval by the shareholders of the Company of a complete
liquidation or dissolution of the Company; or"

3. Former Section 4(d) to Appendix A to the Severance Agreement is renumbered as
new Section 4(e) and former Section 4(e) to Appendix A to the Severance
Agreement is hereby renumbered as new Section 4(f).

4. New Section 4(e) to Appendix A to the Severance Agreement is hereby amended
by deleting the first phrase of that section from the word "Approval" up to and
including the symbol "(2)".


                                       59
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 10.(ii)


               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be
executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company and Executive has executed
this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.




                                              STERLING BANCORP


                                          By:  /s/     JERROLD GILBERT
                                              ---------------------------
                                              Name:  Jerrold Gilbert
                                              Title:  Executive Vice President &
                                                      General Counsel


                                              ---------------------------
                                              Executive


                                       60
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siliconix incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William M. Clancy, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.

|/s/ WILLIAM M. CLANCY          | 
|------------------------------ | 
|                               | 
|William M.   Clancy            | 
|Principal   Accounting Officer | 
|August 10, 2004                |
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5463 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Sethoxydim/Nicobifen. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. PRICE of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Sethoxydim/Nicobifen. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SETHOXYDIM/NICOBIFEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 (5RS)-2-[(EZ)-1- 

(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5- 

[(2RS)-2- 

(ethylthio)propyl]-3- 

hydroxycyclohex-2-en-1-one 

(CAS No. 74051–80–2) 

(Sethoxydim/Nicobifen) 

(provided for in subhead 

3808.93.05) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5463 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60421-60422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26045]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-425-001]


Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc.; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 4, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Williams Gas Pipelines 
Central, Inc. (Williams) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become 
effective September 1, 2000.

First Revised Original Sheet No. 215
Substitute Original Sheet No. 299
Substitute Original Sheet No. 300

    Williams states that this compliance filing is being made pursuant 
to Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act and in compliance with Ordering 
Paragraph B of the Commission's August 31, 2000 Order Accepting Tariff 
Sheets Subject to Conditions and Clarification in Docket No. RP00-425-
000. Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc., 92 FERC para. 61,190 (2000).
    In its August 31, 2000 Order, the Commission accepted, subject to 
conditions and clarification, tariff sheets filed by Williams on July 
31, 2000 proposing to permit Williams to charge negotiated rates 
pursuant to the Commission's Alternative Rates Policy Statement and to 
implement generic discount conditions. In this compliance filing, 
Williams hereby provides the clarifications and/or tariff modifications 
required by the August 31, 2000 Order.
    Williams states that copies of the revised tariff sheets are being 
mailed to Williams's jurisdictional customers, all parties appearing on 
the official service list, and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://

[[Page 60422]]

www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call (202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26045 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 1

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 31-17 Filed 10/02/20 Page 1 of 3
10/1/2020 Flights

https://www.google.com/flights?lite=0#flt=KOA.AUS.2020-10-30*AUS.KOA.2020-11-03;c:USD;e:1;sd:1;t:f 1/2

Best depaing ights

Other depaing ights

Date grid Price graph Nearby airports

Travel update

Coronavirus (COVID-19) may impact travel. See travel advice

Additional bag fees and other fees may apply. Sort by:

11:15 PM – 9:04 PM

United

16h 49m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

SFO, IAH

 $452

round trip

+1

11:15 PM – 2:25 PM

United

10h 10m

KOA–AUS

1 stop

1h 37m SFO

 $492

round trip

+1

10:35 PM – 2:00 PM

American

10h 25m

KOA–AUS

1 stop

2h 11m PHX

$562

round trip

+1

Prices are currently typical for your trip. Details

9:15 AM – 11:17 AM

Uni... · Operated by Mesa Airlines DBA Un...

21h 2m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

SFO, IAH

 $452

round trip

+1

9:15 AM – 2:25 PM

United

24h 10m

KOA–AUS 15h 36m SFO

 $452

round trip

+1 1 stop

9:50 PM – 1:24 PM

Unit... · Operated by Skywest DBA United ...

10h 34m

KOA–AUS

1 stop

1h 35m DEN

 $522

round trip

+1

10:35 PM – 5:34 PM

A... · Operated by Skywest Airlines as A...

13h 59m

KOA–AUS

3 stops

PHX, ABQ, DFW

$543

round trip

+1

3:22 PM – 1:20 PM

Alaska

16h 58m

KOA–AUS 7h 3m SEA

$631

round trip

+1 1 stop

4:15 PM – 11:34 AM

Hawaiian, American

14h 19m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

HNL, DFW

$671

round trip

+1

Round trip 1 passenger Economy

Kailua-Kona KOA Austin AUS Fri, Oct 30 Tue, Nov 3

Bags Stops Airlines Price Times Connecting airports More

Sign in

Exhibit 14, Page 1

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 31-17 Filed 10/02/20 Page 2 of 3
10/1/2020 Flights

https://www.google.com/flights?lite=0#flt=KOA.AUS.2020-10-30*AUS.KOA.2020-11-03;c:USD;e:1;sd:1;t:f 2/2

Nightly prices for 1 guest Oct 31–Nov 3 Search for hotels 

Hotels in Austin

JW Marriott

Austin

4.6 (5485)

Hilton Austin

4.4 (4128)

Fairmont Austin

4.5 (3039)

Explore more destinations from Kailua-Kona

7:03 PM – 2:00 PM

Hawaiian, American

13h 57m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

HNL, PHX

$671

round trip

+1

7:03 PM – 2:00 PM

Hawaiian, American

13h 57m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

HNL, PHX

$671

round trip

+1

11:15 PM – 2:59 PM

United, A... · Operated by Horizon Air as A...

10h 44m

KOA–AUS

1 stop

2h 12m SFO

$827

round trip

+1

7:20 PM – 2:30 PM

Hawaiian, Delta

14h 10m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

HNL, LAX

$1,065

round trip

+1

9:40 PM – 3:43 PM

Alaska, Amer... · Operated by American A...

13h 3m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

SEA, DFW

$1,577

round trip

+1

49 more flights

$155 $131 $150

Flights Language · English Country · United States Currency · USD

Find the cheapest and best flight for you.

About Google Privacy & Terms Help Center and Consumer Information

Displayed currencies may differ from the currencies used to purchase flights. Learn more.

7 03 PM 2 00 PM 13h 57 2 $671 +1 7 03 PM 2 00 PM 13h 57 2 $671 +1

Sign in

Exhibit 14, Page 2

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 31-17 Filed 10/02/20 Page 3 of 3
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5365 

To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on certain machinery for molding 

unvulcanized rubber for tires. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on certain machinery 

for molding unvulcanized rubber for tires. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MACHINERY FOR MOLDING 

4 UNVULCANIZED RUBBER FOR TIRES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5365 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Numerically controlled machinery for molding or otherwise forming uncured, 

unvulcanized rubber to be 

used in production of radial tires, the foregoing not 

containing in a single 

housing both components 

for processing rubber, assembling tire components, 

and for curing green tires 

of subheading 4011.10.10 

designed for use on motor 

cars (including stations 

wagons), such tires with 

rim diameters measuring 

38.10 cm or more but not 

greater than 50.8 cm, and 

tires of subheading 

4011.20.10 designed for 

use on on-highway light 

trucks, and parts thereof 

(provided for in subheading 8477.20.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 11, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 06-50789

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

MIGUEL ROCHA-BELMONTES

Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, El Paso

---------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

sentence of the district court is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand case for resentencing is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed alternative

motion to extend time to file Appellee’s brief 30 days from the
Court’s denial of Appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is

DISMISSED AS MOOT.
# AGENCY:

 Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

 Proposed rule; extension of public comment period.

# SUMMARY:

 On October 5, 1999, the Forest Service published a proposed rule to guide land and resource management planning on national forests and grasslands (64 FR 54074). The agency extended the public comment period for this proposed rule, which is scheduled to end on February 3, 2000 (64 FR 70204). In response to Congressional requests and the need to provide the public more time to review and evaluate the proposed regulations, the Forest Service is extending the public comment period until February 10, 2000.

# DATES:

 Comments must be submitted in writing and must be received by February 10, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

 Send written comments on the proposed planning rule to the CAET-USDA Team, Attn. Planning Rule, Forest Service, USDA, 200 East Broadway, Room 103, Post Office Box 7669, Missoula, MT 59807; or via email to planreg/wo_caet@fs.fed.us; or via facsimile to (406) 329-3021.

Comments, including names and addresses when provided, are subject to public inspection and copying. The public may inspect comments received on this proposed rule in the Office of Deputy Chief, National Forest Systems, Third Floor, Southwest Wing, Yates Building, 14th and Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC between the hours of 8:30 AM and 4:00 PM.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Bob Cunningham, Ecosystem Management Coordination Staff, telephone: (202) 205-7820.

Dated: February 1, 2000.

Barbara C. Weber,

Acting Associate Chief for Natural Resources.

[FR Doc. 00-2597 Field 2-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5454 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Problad Plus fungicide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. MEEHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Problad Plus fungicide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROBLAD PLUS FUNGICIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures containing at 

least 20 percent by weight 

β-conglutin plant derived 

polypeptide, with an average molecular weight of 

20,000 daltons (BLAD) 

(provided for in subheading 3808.92.50) ......... 3.7% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5454 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ElderTrust Operating Limited Partnership (the Partnership) for the period ended December
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Schweinhart, Chief Financial Officer of ElderTrust, the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2005                                           
|                                                               
|/s/ Richard A. Schweinhart                                     
|Richard A. Schweinhart                                         
|Chief Financial Officer of ElderTrust,                         
|the General Partner of ElderTrust Operating Limited Partnership



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying quarterly report of Union Pacific Railroad Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard K. Davidson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|    |  |                               
|--- |  | ------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Richard K. Davidson       
|    |  | Richard K. Davidson           
|    |  | Chairman and                  
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer       
|    |  | Union Pacific Railroad Company



May 6, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying quarterly report of Union Pacific Railroad Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Knight, Jr., Executive Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|    |  |                                       
|--- |  | --------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Robert M. Knight, Jr.             
|    |  | Robert M. Knight, Jr.                 
|    |  | Executive Vice President - Finance and
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer               
|    |  | Union Pacific Railroad Company        



May 6, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.