alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex parte Ernest HERRING.

No. 27260.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 13, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.'

Relator is confined in the penitentiary having been convicted of several felonies. A previous application for release was denied by this court in Ex parte Herring, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 624, 245 S.W.2d 705.

■ One of the convictions against relator is a sentence dated October 28, 1939, in Cause No. 47,672 in Criminal District Court No. 2 of Harris County, for a term of not less than five nor more than twenty-five years.

Application for habeas corpus was presented to Hon. Langston King, Judge of Criminal District Court No. 2 of Harris County, who presided at the trial in 1939, and after hearing, the writ was granted and mader returnable before this court in accordance with Art. 119, V.A.C.C.P,

Judge King correctly construed the twenty-five year sentence above mentioned as running concurrently with other sentences against relator.

We overrule the contention that relator was entitled to credit on this sentence for time served prior to its pronouncement on October 23, 1939.

This court is not authorized tp enter a declaratory judgment, but only to inquire into the legality of the confinement or restraint of the prisoner. Ex parte King, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 231, 240 S.W.2d 777.

When relator can show that he has credit from and after the date of the twenty-five year sentence sufficient to satisfy it as a concurrent sentence he may seek relief against further incarceration.

The relief prayed for is denied.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 02-4309



# 
P ATRICK S TEVENS , Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-98-462) Submitted: September 27, 2002 Decided: November 5, 2002 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Parks N. Small, Federal Public Defender, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Patrick Stevens appeals his conviction of one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (2000) and sentence to 140 months in prison and three years of supervised release. We affirm. Stevens’ counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). In the Andersbrief, Stevens’ counsel briefed two issues, both of which counsel ultimately concluded were not meritorious: whether the district court fully complied with the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, and whether the district court erred in applying the sentencing guidelines. Stevens was informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but failed to do so. We review violations of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 for plain error. See United States v. Martinez , 277 F.3d 517, 524-27 (4th Cir. 2002). Under this standard, we exercise our discretion only to correct errorsthat are plain, material, or affecting substantial rights, and which seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Id. at 524 (citing United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 731- 32 (1993)). We have reviewed the record and find no error.We review the district court’s application of the sentencing guidelines for clear error as to factual findings; we review legal determinations de novo. United States v. Blake , 81 F.3d 498, 503 (4th Cir.1996). We have reviewed the district court’s application of the guidelines and find no error. In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record andhave found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Stevens’ conviction and sentence. We require that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such petition would be frivolous,then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served 2 U NITED S TATES v. S TEVENSon the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3 U NITED S TATES v. S TEVENS
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Virginia Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Virginia Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 7      | 3      | 15     | 15     | 16     | 8      | 32     | 17    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 6      | 2      | 1      | 21     | 0      | 9      | 6      | 15     | 79     | 81    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 295    | 145    | 166    | 37     | 69     | 3      | 14     | 36     | 246    | 87    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 560    | 255    | 332    | 271    | 167    | 183    | 120    | 31     | 168    | 216   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 308    | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
P 0 L Y U R E T H A N E S 

Dalton, GA Hickory, NC 

September 22, 2014 

Ms. Margaret Shepperd 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. (6205T) 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Margaret: 

PO Box 1528 • Mount Airy, NC 27030-1528 

800.346.8229 • Fax 336.789.9586 • www.NCFI.com 

Mount Airy, NC Salt Lake City, UT 

This letter is sent in follow-up to our meeting in Washington, DC on Thursday, August 28. At that time 

Cindy Newberg requested that we submit summary comments in writing. Since Cindy did not yet have 

cards with her new address, I am sending this to you for review and inclusion in the docket. I have 

highlighted in yellow those comments which contain CBI (Confidential Business Information) and should 

not be a part of the public record. 

NCFI Polyurethanes is a specialty systems house which produces a wide variety of polyurethane chemical 

systems, both spray and pour used in both insulating and non-insulating applications from our two 

facilities in Mount Airy, NC and Salt Lake City, Utah. NCFI has manufactured liquid chemical systems 

since 1967 and flexible slab stock since 1964. We are a division ofBamhardt Manufacturing Company 

based in Charlotte, NC, which has been in business since 1900. NCFI received the EPA Stratospheric 

Ozone Protection Award in 2004 for our work in developing to market formulations utilizing hydrocarbon 

blowing agents from Exxon. 

The introduction ofHFO based, low GWP blowing agents will mark our fourth conversion of nonflammable liquid blowing agents into polyurethane spray and pour chemistry. Based on our experience 

and extensive work so far, this molecule will be the most difficult to formulate successfully into robust, 

shelf stable systems that perform in field and in plant over a wide variety of weather or plant conditions, 

altitude, customer and/or listing agency requirements. 

A Division of BMC, Inc. 

NCFI since 1964 

BARNHARDT MFG. CO. since 1900 
Respectfully Submitted, 

NCFI Polyurethanes 

~~\0- ~ 

Clarence Tolbett 

Vice President 

if~~ Richard Stoehr 

Director of Research & Development
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5442 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5442

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Prohexadione calcium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Prohexadione calcium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHEXADIONE CALCIUM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.03 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Prohexadione calcium) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

★

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5522 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,4–Benzenedicarboxylic acid, 

polymer with N,N’Bis(2–aminoethyl)–1,2–ethanediamine, cyclized, 

methosulfate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,4– 

Benzenedicarboxylic acid, polymer with N,N’Bis(2– 

aminoethyl)–1,2–ethanediamine, cyclized, methosulfate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,4-BENZENEDICARBOXYLIC ACID, POLYMER 

4 WITH N,N′BIS(2-AMINOETHYL)-1,2- 

5 ETHANEDIAMINE, CYCLIZED, 

6 METHOSULFATE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.93 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

9 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, polymer with N,N′Bis(2- 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5522 IH1S 

1 aminoethyl)-1,2-ethanediamine, cyclized, methosulfate) is 

2 amended by striking the date in the effective period col3 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

6 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

7 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP97-255-013]

Take notice that on September 27, 2000, TransColorado Gas Transmission Company (TransColorado) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 21 and Ninth Revised Sheet No. 22. to be effective September 16, 2000.

TransColorado states that the filing has been filed in compliance with the Commission's letter order issued March 20, 1997, in Docket No. RP97-255-000. The tendered tariff sheets revised TransColorado's Tariff to amend its negotiated-rate firm transportation service agreement with Dominion Exploration & Production. TransColorado requested waiver of 18 CFR 154.207 so that the tendered tariff sheets may become effective September 16, 2000.

TransColorado stated that a copy of this filing has been served upon all parties to this proceeding, TransColorado's customers, the Colorado Public Utilities Commission and the New Mexico Public Utilities Commission.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-25512 Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 5

Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 44-7 Filed 11/04/20 Page 1 of 2
Contact

www.linkedin.com/in/craigetchegoyen-aa8a07199 (LinkedIn)

Craig Etchegoyen

Chairman at WSOU investments

Kailua-Kona

Experience

PARTIE 

Chief Executive Officer

WSOU investments 

Chairman 

January 2017 - Present (3 years 11 months)

Hawaii, United States

Page 1 of 1

Case 6:20-cv-00482-ADA Document 44-7 Filed 11/04/20 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          50,362
<SECURITIES>                                       570
<RECEIVABLES>                                  234,126<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F2>
<INVENTORY>                                    305,334
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               594,949
<PP&E>                                         145,253<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 801,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          397,176
<BONDS>                                        189,316
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,161
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   801,526
<SALES>                                        833,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               833,356
<CGS>                                          741,781
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  741,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,365
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,412
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,056
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,468
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09
<FN>
<F1>SHOWN NET IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<F2>NOT SHOWN SEPARATELY UNDER MATERIALITY GUIDELINES
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26043]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-169-001]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

October 4, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Natural Gas Pipeline 
Company of America (Natural) tendered for filing to be a part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute First Revised 
Sheet No. 75, Original Sheet No. 75A and Original Sheet No. 75B, to be 
effective November 1, 2000.
    Natural states that these tariff sheets were filed in compliance 
with the Commission's ``Order Following Technical Conference'' issued 
September 15, 2000 in Docket No. RP00-169-000, relating to capacity 
release of rights under Natural's Rate Schedule FRSS (Firm Reverse 
Storage Service).
    Natural requests waiver of the Commission's Regulations to the 
extent necessary to permit the tariff sheets submitted herein to become 
effective November 1, 2000.
    Natural states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
parties set out on the Commission's official service list in Docket No. 
RP00-169.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us./online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26043 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of %, along with costs.

’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

’ other:

.

This action was (check one):

’ tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

’ tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

’ decided by Judge 

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Western District of Texas Alexander Molina Smurfit Kappa North America, LLC 5:20-cv-626-OLG ✔

The Court finds that Plaintiff’s claims should be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

✔ Orlando L. Garcia 02/03/2021

FILED

DEPUTY 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BY: ________________________________ February 02, 2021 MGR

Case 5:20-cv-00626-OLG Document 14 Filed 02/02/21 Page 1 of 1
#### John Rankin et al., Appellants, v Vincent J. Milazzo, Jr., Doing Business as Two Guys Service Center, et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), entered December 30, 1988, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

*457The plaintiffs have failed to preserve for appellate review their claim that the trial court should have instructed the jury that it could only use the plaintiff John Rankin’s prior pleadings for the limited purpose of impeaching his credibility (see, CPLR 4110-b; *Up-Front Indus. v U. S. Indus.,*63 NY2d 1004). We decline to reach this claim in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, *Veal v New York City Tr. Auth.,*148 AD2d 443). Sullivan, J. P., Harwood, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Win Gaming Media, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 8, 2009

                                                        /s/ Shimon Citron
                                                        -----------------
                                                        Shimon Citron
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
```