alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3439] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Department of State. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the Dresden Green Diamond, imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign lender. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the object at the Harry Winston Research Foundation, Inc., New York, New York, on October 11, 2000, and at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, from on or about October 12, 2000, to on or about January 15, 2001, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, contact Lorie J. Nierenberg, Assistant Legal Adviser for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-5078). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301-4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: October 3, 2000. 

William B. Bader, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 00-25975 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5335 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain drive axles designed 

for use in off-road construction loaders and backhoes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. BRALEY of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain drive 

axles designed for use in off-road construction loaders 

and backhoes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN DRIVE AXLES DESIGNED FOR USE IN 

4 OFF-ROAD CONSTRUCTION LOADERS AND 

5 BACKHOES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


rfrederick on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5335 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Drive axles with differential, whether or not provided with other transmission components (provided for in subheading 

8708.50.61) designed for 

use in off-road construction loaders and backhoes Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00465-ADA

PATENT CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF THE FILING OF A 

PETITION FOR INTER-PARTES REVIEW 

Pursuant to the Court’s Published Standard Order Governing Proceedings – Patent Case 

(“Order Governing Proceedings, version 3.3”),1 namely General Issue No. 4, Plaintiff WSOU 

Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development hereby provides notice that Defendant 

Microsoft Corporation filed a petition requesting inter-partes review of the patent in-suit, U.S. 

Patent No. 8,274,902, on April 14, 2021. See IPR2021-00751, attached as Exhibit A. The PTAB 

has not yet issued a Notice of Filing Date Accorded. The following represents the expected 

schedule of the IPR proceeding if such a notice were issued today.

April 29, 2021 PTAB issues a Notice of Filing Date Accorded

October 29, 2021 PTAB decision on institution expected

October 29, 2022 If PTAB trial instituted, then PTAB final written 

decision expected

1 See https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/wpcontent/uploads/Standing%20Orders/Waco/Albright/Order%20Governing%20Proceedings%20-

%20Patent%20Cases%20022321.pdf

Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 71 Filed 04/29/21 Page 1 of 2
Dated: April 29, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Ryan Loveless

James L. Etheridge 

Texas Bar No. 24059147 

Ryan S. Loveless 

Texas Bar No. 24036997 

Brett A. Mangrum 

Texas Bar No. 24065671 

Travis L. Richins 

Texas Bar No. 24061296 

Jeffrey Huang

Brian M. Koide

Etheridge Law Group, PLLC 

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324 

Southlake, TX 76092 

Tel.: (817) 470-7249 

Fax: (817) 887-5950 

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Jhuang@EtheridgeLaw.com 

Brian@EtheridgeLaw.com

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered electronically 

via the U.S. District Court [LIVE]-Document Filing System to all counsel of record on April 29, 

2021.

/s/ Ryan Loveless

Ryan S. Loveless

Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 71 Filed 04/29/21 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.11

                                                              [COUNTRYWIDE LOGO]

                                                     400 Countrywide Way
March 15, 2005                                Simi Valley, California 93065-6298

RWT HOLDINGS, INC.
591 Redwood Hwy, # 3140
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Attn: Gloria Li

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am the First Vice President, Loan
Administration of Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., fka Countrywide Funding
Corporation. I further certify, with respect to the Servicing Agreements for
Countrywide Mortgage Obligations, Inc., the following:

I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004 under the Agreements and, to the best of my
knowledge, based on my review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties,
responsibilities or obligations under the Agreements throughout the fiscal year.

/s/ Joseph Candelario              March 15, 2005
------------------------           ----------------
Joseph Candelario                  Date
First Vice President
Compliance Officer
Loan Administration

re: Investor Numbers: 7001476, 7001629, 7001755
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

***Certificationpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

***(18 U.S.C.Section 1350)***

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of American States Water Company and Golden State Water Company (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RobertJ. Sprowls, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| /s/ ROBERT J. SPROWLS                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert J. Sprowls                      |   |
| President and Chief Executive  Officer |   |
|                                   |   |
| Date: November 9, 2010                 |   |

 

----
June 18, 2020

Case 1:20-mj-00501-AWA Document 19 Filed 06/18/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:20-mj-00501-AWA Document 19 Filed 06/18/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:20-mj-00501-AWA Document 19 Filed 06/18/20 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Sterling Bancorp, a New York corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|       |                  |  |                                                             
|------ | ---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: | November 4, 2010 |  | /s/ John W. Tietjen                                         
|       |                  |  |                                                             
|       |                  |  | Name: John W.
 Tietjen                                      
|       |                  |  | Title: Executive Vice President
 and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is  being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

61

---
#### MANSELL v. STATE.

No. 25738.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 26, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is felony theft; the punishment, two years.

Three members of the Najar family, the operators of El Charro Inn, testified that appellant came into their place of business on the night charged in the indictment, in company with others; ordered food; asked directions to the rest room; came back therefrom; cancelled his order; and left the place of business alone. They further testified that, at approximately the time of appellant’s visit, it was discovered that $90 had been taken frortí a billfold belonging to Mrs. Najar, which she had left on the commode in the rest room. Among the bills taken, there had been a $10 bill with a certain tear and bearing a pencilled date “October 7, 1950”.

Mr. Holland, the operator of a cafe near El Charro, testified that, on the night in question, appellant had come to his place of business and paid a debt with a torn $10 bill bearing a notation “October 7, 1950”. Mrs. Holland testified that, on the same *248occasion, appellant gave her $25 and asked her to keep the same for him. Appellant was arrested later that night, and approximately $61 taken from his person.

Appellant testified, corroborating the State’s witnesses, hut claimed that he had found the money lying on the rest room floor, had looked in the purse for more, but denied that he took anything from the purse.

We find the evidence sufficient to support the conviction.

No formal bills of exception appear in the record, and none are indexed in the statement of facts.

The proceedings appearing regular, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTEE OF TREASURE ISLAND ROYALTY TRUST
             PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Treasure Island Royalty Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the
Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust.

                                       WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
                                       Trustee for Treasure Island Royalty Trust

Date: March 31, 2005               By:      /s/ Kevin M. Dobrava
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kevin M. Dobrava
                                       Vice President
UAVRG, LLC Maintenance CheckList 

Customer Name 

Customer Location 

Mission Flight #

Date/Time

Checked 

Airframe

Check that all the screws on the frame, gimbal and motor mounts are still securely fastened.

Check that all the ABS parts are still intact and do not show signs of wear or fatigue, particularly the inner mounts

Check the carbon plates and tubes for wear and damage that would reduce the structural integrity of the frame.

Motors

Check that the prop holder is still secure fastened to the motor with all three screws and that the nut and tread that secures the prop is still in good condition.

Check that the motor is still securely fastened to the motor mount with all 4 screws.

Check that the motor runs smooth when turned by hand and that there is not any play in the bearings.

Check that the motors are free of dust and any other foreign particles.

Check that the motor windings do not show any damage or bubbling/melting. Also check that the motor wires are not damaged.

Check that the motor windings do not show any damage or bubbling/melting. Also check that the motor wires are not damaged.

Electronics 

Check that the battery connector is in good condition and that the soldering is still secure. Also make sure the wires are not damaged.

Check that the wires between the ESC and the motors are not damaged.

Check that all the different electronic modules are still securely fastened. Check the ESC, Gimbal Control Board, Receiver, Flight Controller, GPS/Compass, etc.

Check that all the various plugs that connect all the electronics are still securely plugged in.

Check that all the electronics are free of dust or dirt.

Check sensor readings for abnormalities. (Check in Mission Planner, Compass reading, GPS, attitude, etc. See 

Radio 

Check that the control gimbals are free from dust and other particles.

Check that the battery is still in good condition.

Perform a radio range check. (See radio manual for details)

Lipo Batteries

Check that the battery is not punctured or does not have any other physical damage. The battery should also not be swollen at all.

Check that all the cells of the battery are balanced. (Within 0.1V of each other)

Check that the battery connector is in good condition and that the soldering is still secure. Also make sure the wires are not damaged.

Signature 2 

Signature 1
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Kronos International, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harold C. Simmons,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Gregory M. Swalwell, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/ Harold C.
Simmons


Harold C.
Simmons


Chief Executive Officer








/s/ Gregory M.
Swalwell


Gregory
M. Swalwell


Chief Financial Officer








March 12,
2008








Note:  The
certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly
stated in such filing.
Certificate as to Compliance


         I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of Household Finance Corporation
(the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 3.10 of
the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 20, 2002 among HFC Revolving
Corporation, as Depositor, Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2002-2, the Master
Servicer and Bank One, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, that:

         1.    A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from June 20
         through December 31, 2002 (the "Period") and of its performance under
         the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision;
         and

         2.    To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master
         Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Sale
         and Servicing Agreement throughout the Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 31st day of March, 2003.


                                            /s/ Steven H. Smith
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Steven H. Smith
                                            Servicing Officer


HEL 2002-2
AUG-21-2015 09:19

U.S. Deportment of Tronspartotlon Federcsl Aviation Administration 

## AUG 1 82015
Mr. Thomas A. 

### Enyart The Boeing Company FAA RENTON

Southern CaliforniaEngineering Design Center 2401 E. Wardlow RoacL Mail Code DS00-0022 Long Beach, California**90807~1515** 

### Dear Mr. 

### Enyart: ; ! Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. P.02/02

Renton, Washington S8057·335a

We have received Boeing's petition letter (CP-L4L-15-00278) dated June 29, 2015, requesting an exemption from§§ 25.901(c) Amendment 25-126, and 25.981(a)(3) Amendment 25-125 ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations. 

### This exemption, ifgranted, would allow planned type-design changes to the Model 747-400 (freighters only) and Model 747-400 BCF center wing 

### tank Fuel 

### Quantity Indication System (FQIS) fuselage wiring installation. This request was posted on the Department ofTransportation's Federal Docket Management 

### System.(at Regulations.gov) on

### August 11, 2015, 

### and has

# been assigned Docket

### No. 

### FAA20 15-3166. We are 

### in. 

### the process ofreviewing your request We will contact you ifwe 

### need additional information. A summary ofyour petition will be 

### published in the Federal Register for public comment, in accordance with the requirements of§ 11.85. You will be advised ofthe agency's decision on yourpetition as soon as possible. Ifyou bave any questions

# or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please contact Mr. Mike Dostert at (425) 227-2132, orby e-mail at Mike.Dostert@faa.gov. Sincerely,



# ff(J.;rv:Jhpt.! 

# fr

# ti) DeanaM. Stedman
. 

## \t Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service

TOTAL P.02
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **6 527** 

ROY HASKELL PRICE , P etitioner

– Appell ant ,
v. MCKITHER BODISON , Respondent

– Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Sout h Carolina , at Rock Hill
. Terry L. Wooten , District Judge. ( 0 :0 8

- cv - 0 3451

- TLW )

Submitted : November 30 , 2010 Decided: December 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, K EENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judge s .
Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
. Roy Haske ll Price , Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General , Columbia, South Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Roy Haskell Price seeks to appeal the district cour t’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstratin g that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court den ies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independe ntly reviewed the record and conclude that Price has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately present ed in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. 487


Exhibit 4.3



Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated September 14, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 535 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-257107) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


September 14, 2021