alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC. 

AND ZTE (TX), INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

C.A. NO. 6:20-cv-00487-ADA

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO WITHDRAW 

ATTORNEYS OF RECORD 

Before the Court is Defendants ZTE Corporation’s, ZTE (USA) Inc.’s and ZTE (TX), 

Inc.’s (collectively “ZTE”) Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Attorneys of Record, David Royce 

Keesling, Erick Scott Robinson, and Timothy Scott Kittle, each of Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig 

PLLC. Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be and 

hereby is GRANTED.

It is therefore ORDERED that David Royce Keesling, Erick Scott Robinson, and 

Timothy Scott Kittle, the attorneys of Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC are permitted to witdraw 

as counsel of record for Defendants in this case. ECF Notifications to David Royce Keesling, 

Erick Scott Robinson, and Timothy Scott Kittle are to be terminated in this case. 

SIGNED AND ENTERED this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.

________________________________

ALAN D. ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 35-1 Filed 11/06/20 Page 1 of 1
#### The State v. Roscoe *et al., Appellants.*

Practice : appeal, when dismissed. Where the record shows that no order, granting an appeal, was ever made, and that the affidavit for an appeal was not made until in vacation, after the adjournment of the term of court at which final judgment was entered, the cause will be stricken from the docket of the Supreme Court.

*Appeal from Jaclcson Criminal Court.*— Hon. *H. P.*White, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.

*Sherry & Hughes*and *W. M. Burris*for appellants.

*B. Q.*Boone, Attorney Gf-eneral, for the state.

Sherwood, J.

The merits of this cause cannot be considered, for the reason that the record shows that no order granting an appeal was ever made, and that the affidavit for an appeal was not made until in vacation, after the adjournment of the term of court at which final judgment was entered. *State ex rel. v. Keuchler,*83 Mo. 193; *State*v. *Rhodes,*86 Mo. 635; *Brown v.*Railroad, 83 Mo. 478; *Cissell v.*Cissell, 77 Mo. 371; *Stavely v. Kunkel, 27*Mo. 422; *Lengel v. Smith,*48 Mo. 276; *Clelland*v. *Shaw,*51 Mo. 440; *State ex rel. v. Lewis,*71 Mo. 170; *Randolph v. Mauck,*78 Mo. 468; R. S., 1879, sec. 1973.

For these reasons, we have no jurisdiction of this cause, and, therefore, order the same stricken from the docket.

All concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60428-60429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26063]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Draft Application for Nonpower License and Preliminary 
Draft Environmental Assessment (PDEA) and Request for Preliminary Terms 
and Conditions

October 4, 2000.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a, Type of Application: Nonpower License (Draft).
    b. Project No.: 2852.
    c. Applicant: New York State Electric & Gas Corporation.
    d. Name of Project: Keuka.
    e. Location: On Waneta and Lamoka Lakes, Keuka Lake, Mud Creek, in 
Steuben and Schulyer Counties, New York.
    f. Applicant Contact: Carol Howland, New York State Electric & Gas 
Corporation, Corporate Drive, Kirkwood Industrial Park, P.O. Box 5224, 
Binghamton, NY 13902-5224.
    g. FERC Contact: William Guey-Lee (202) 219-2808, Email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f48565353565e5211584a5a46535a5a7f595a4d5c11595a5b114a4c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9dec0c5c5c0c8c487cedcccd0c5cccce9cfccdbca87cfcccd87dcda">[email protected]</span></a>.
    h. New York State Electric & Gas Corporation (NYSEG) mailed a copy 
of the Draft Nonpower License Application and PDEA to interested 
parties on September 15, 2000. The Commission received a copy of the 
Draft Application and PDEA on September 21, 2000. Copies of the 
documents are available from NYSEG at the above address.
    i. With this notice we are soliciting preliminary terms, 
conditions, recommendations, prescriptions, and comments on the PDEA 
and draft license application. All comments on the PDEA and draft 
license application should be sent to the address above in item (f) 
with one copy filed with the Commission at the following address: 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, David P. Boergers, Secretary, 888 
First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426. All comments must include the 
project name and number and bear the heading ``Preliminary Comments,'' 
``Preliminary Recommendations,'' ``Preliminary Terms and Conditions,'' 
or ``Preliminary Prescriptions.'' Any party interested in

[[Page 60429]]

commenting on the draft license application and the PDEA, must do so on 
or before December 15, 2000.
    j. With this notice, we are initiating consultation with the STATE 
HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER (SHPO), as required by Section 106, 
National Historic Preservation Act, and the regulations of the Advisory 
Council on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR 800.4.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26063 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1227

BEDES TAMASANG NDENGE,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. 

Submitted: August 22, 2008 Decided: September 15, 2008

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bedes Tamasang Ndenge, Petitioner Pro Se. Andrew Brinkman, Craig

William Kuhn, Trial Attorney, Elizabeth Joanne Stevens, Senior

Litigation Counsel, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Office of Immigration

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bedes Tamasang Ndenge, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) denying his second motion to reopen. We have

reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board

did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, although we grant leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for review for the

reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ndenge (B.I.A. Jan. 30,

2008). We deny Ndenge’s motion to reopen and remand to the

immigration judge. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
|                                                                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                          
|New Mexico - West Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                                          
|New Mexico - West Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 2      | 29     | 0      | 0      | 5      | 8      | 5      | 1      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 25     | 0      | 1      | 11     | 0      | 1      | 34     | 1      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         637,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,412,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   538,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,638,000
<PP&E>                                     128,488,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              35,786,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             113,089,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,234,000
<BONDS>                                     30,700,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    517,000
<COMMON>                                        31,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,737,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               113,089,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,432,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,628,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (55,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                59,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             782,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                110,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    46,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             64,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    64,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL 

INC., EMC CORPORATION,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO. W-20-CV-00476-ADA

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 

Derek T. Gilliland. ECF No. 262. The report recommends Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 

244, be GRANTED-IN-PART and that the case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE without 

deciding whether to award attorneys’ fees. The report and recommendation was filed on January 

4, 2024. 

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations 

of the magistrate judge within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report and recommendation, thereby securing de novo review by the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 72(b). As of today, neither party has filed objections.

When no objections are timely filed, a district court reviews the magistrate judge’s report 

and recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note (“When no 

timely objection is filed, the [district] court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on 

the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). The Court has reviewed the report 

and recommendation and finds no clear error.

Case 6:20-cv-00476-ADA-DTG Document 265 Filed 04/18/24 Page 1 of 2
2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States 

Magistrate Judge Gilliland, ECF No. 262, is ADOPTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC’s Motion, ECF No. 

244, is GRANTED-IN-PART in accordance with the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of Plaintiff’s claims in the above-captioned case 

are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, without resolving the question of attorneys’ fees.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as agreed by the parties, Defendants shall be allowed 

to seek their costs as the prevailing parties.

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the 

case.

SIGNED this 18th day of April, 2024.

Case 6:20-cv-00476-ADA-DTG Document 265 Filed 04/18/24 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of TraceGuard Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dr. Ehud Ganani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



Date:  March 30, 2006                             By: /s/ Dr. Ehud Ganani
                                                     --------------------
                                                  Dr. Ehud Ganani
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5321 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide for the more accurate 

and complete enumeration of members of the Armed Forces in any 

tabulation of total population by the Secretary of Commerce, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. WHITFIELD (for himself and Mr. GUTHRIE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide for the 

more accurate and complete enumeration of members 

of the Armed Forces in any tabulation of total population 

by the Secretary of Commerce, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service Members and 

5 Communities Count Act of 2012’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5321 IH

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVED ENUMERATION OF MEMBERS OF THE 

2 ARMED FORCES IN ANY TABULATION OF 

3 TOTAL POPULATION BY SECRETARY OF COM4 MERCE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 141 of title 13, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub8 section (h); and 

9 (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(g) Effective beginning with the 2020 decennial cen12 sus of population, in taking any tabulation of total popu13 lation by States, the Secretary shall take appropriate 

14 measures to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, 

15 that all members of the Armed Forces deployed abroad 

16 on the date of taking such tabulation are— 

17 ‘‘(1) fully and accurately counted; and 

18 ‘‘(2) properly attributed to the State in which 

19 their permanent duty station or homeport is located 

20 on such date.’’. 

21 (b) CONSTRUCTION.—The amendments made by sub22 section (a) shall not be construed to affect the residency 

23 status of any member of the Armed Forces under any pro24 vision of law other than title 13, United States Code. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 15.6



LOGO

The Board of Directors of

Randgold Resources Limited (the Company)

March 30, 2012



|Re: | Consent
|--- | -------

Gentlemen:

I, Timothy Peters, do hereby consent to the reference of myself in the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2011 (the Annual Report) to which this consent is an exhibit, to any reference to Mr. Tim Peters under the heading Experts in any registration statement into which the Annual Report is incorporated by
reference, and to the citation and/or summarization of the reserve statement in the Annual Report as calculated by me for the Kibali project underground mineral reserves.

Dated this
30thday of March, 2012.



|                   |  |                  
|------------------ |  | -----------------
|By: /s/ Tim Peters
|Name:              |  | Tim Peters       
|                   |  | Title: Consultant
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-591-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

October 3, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 29, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company 
(``ANR'') tendered for filing, as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the Fourth Revised Sheet No. 45E.01, to be 
effective November 1, 2000.
    ANR states that the purpose of this filing is to designate in its 
tariff a new point eligible for service under its existing Rate 
Schedule IPLS.
    ANR states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boerger,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-25854 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit
      99.2**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB of
      Standard Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the three months ended November
      30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, Alexander B. Magallano, Chief Executive Officer, President and
      Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
      and belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.




Date:
      January 3, 2008





ALEXANDER
      B. MAGALLANO


Alexander
      B. Magallano


Chief
      Executive Officer,


President
      and Director








-1-