alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT D 

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 1 of 15
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

DELL INC., AND EMC 

CORPORATION,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00473-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00474-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00475-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00476-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00477-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00478-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00479-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00480-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00481-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00482-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00485-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00486-ADA

PATENT CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTIONS

Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos License and Development ( “Plaintiff”)

submits the following preliminary constructions pursuant to the Order Governing Proceedings 

(“OGP”) and the Scheduling Order entered in this case. Plaintiff reserves the right to update, 

supplement, revise, or otherwise modify these preliminary constructions in light of further 

investigation and discovery, including evidence not yet produced by Defendants, or in light of 

modification or supplementation of Defendants’ invalidity contentions. Plaintiff reserves the right 

to argue that the plain and ordinary meaning should apply to any of the claim terms. 

Plaintiff notes that, for certain claim language, Defendants identify entire phrases, without 

specifying which ones of the terms included within those phrases Defendants seeks to have the 

Court construe. Plaintiff can presently only guess as to whether Defendants will seek construction 

of only certain terms included in those phrases.

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 2 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 3 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 4 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 5 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 6 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 7 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 8 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 9 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 10 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 11 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 12 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 13 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 14 of 15
14

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered electronically 

to all counsel of record via email on January 20, 2021.

/s/ Ryan S. Loveless

Ryan S. Loveless

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 172-4 Filed 03/23/22 Page 15 of 15
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5547 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Acetyltoluene. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. BENISHEK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Acetyltoluene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-ACETYLTOLUENE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4-Acetyltoluene (CAS No. 

122–00–9) (provided for in 

subheading 2914.39.90) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5547 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended on September 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and to which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Sarah H. Moore, the principal financial officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 4, 2005



/s/    SARAH H. MOORESarah H. Moore Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and will be retained by The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5066 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5066

      To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Frelinghuysen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-AMINO-1,2-PROPANEDIOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        3-Amino-1,2-        Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          propanediol (CAS                                                  12/31/2015
                          No. 616-30-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2922.19.95)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 4.1
                                   RESOLUTIONS

     WHEREAS, the Company is indebted Charlotte Given for services rendered and
expenses incurred in connection with the business of the Company.


RESOLVED, that in payment for services provided the Company grants 500,000
shares of the Company's common stock to be registered in a registration
statement on Form S-8 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC") promptly after the Company becomes current in all if its filing
obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00040-CV

Eldo E. FREZZA, M.D.,

Appellant

v.

Melissa FLORES,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CVB000655D1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant Eldo E. Frezza, M.D. 

SIGNED November 21, 2018.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Group Ventures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report"), I, Richard (Xuxin) Shao, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | By: | /s/ Richard (Xuxin) Shao
| | --- | ------------------------
| |     | Richard (Xuxin) Shao    
| |     | President & CFO         
| |     |                         
| |     | Date: August 25, 2011   

---
CERTIFICATIONS



I, John Plourde, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;



c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.





Date: May 29, 2017





By:    /s/  John Plourde



John Plourde,

President and CEO
EXHIBIT 6

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 42-8 Filed 11/04/20 Page 1 of 2
Wade+Co

About

01

Team

02

Portfolio

03

Contact

04

520 Newport Centre Boulevard

Newport Beach, California 92660

aliona(at)

wadeandcompany.com

Name

Organization

Email

Message

Submit

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 42-8 Filed 11/04/20 Page 2 of 2
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|---------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND                  
|CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER                      
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Marc Branson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Texada Ventures Inc.(the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended November 30, 2005, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       

| | By:    | /s/
      Marc Branson 
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | MARC BRANSON           
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        | Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:  | March 8, 2006          

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

 NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) ***Final Site*** September 2015 

ESTECHGENERAL

CHEMICALCOMPANY

Calumet City, Illinois

Cook County

 Site Location:

The Estech site is a 54-acre inactive facility located in a heavily industrialized area at 150 Marble Street, Calumet City,

Illinois.

 Site History:

Estech manufactured pesticides and fertilizers at the site from approximately 1952 to 1969. From the late 1980s until 1996,

the site was an open dump for auto fluff waste. The property is currently abandoned. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

Elevated levels of a range of contaminants have been found in site soils, sediment and ground water. The principal

contaminants are polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides, metals, and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs).

Auto fluff waste containing PCBs, pesticides, SVOCs and metals is present at the site, up to 20 feet in depth. Elevated

levels of these same contaminants can also be found at the former lagoon system area which covered approximately 7.5 

acres of the site.

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment:

An on-site wetland is contaminated. The Grand Calumet River borders the southern boundary of the site. There are fish

consumption advisories in the Calumet River system due to the presence of PCBs.

 Response Activities (to date):

In 1999, the EPA placed a six to twelve inch soil barrier over approximately 27 acres of auto fluff.

 Need for NPL Listing:

The state of Illinois referred the site to the EPA. There are no other programs available to effectively undertake a 

comprehensive site investigation or clean-up. The EPA received a letter of support for placing thissite to the NPLfrom the

state of Illinois. Calumet City also expressed support for NPL Listing to the state of Illinois.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change

as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, orsubsequentFRnotices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these

substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

GABRIEL R. RAMIREZ,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF 

SOCIAL SECURITY;

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

SA-20-CV-00457-ESC

FINAL JUDGMENT

On this day, the Court vacated the Commissioner’s decision finding Plaintiff not 

disabled. For the reasons set forth in the Court’s memorandum opinion, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this case is 

remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. 

SIGNED this 3rd day of June, 2021.

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00457-ESC Document 24 Filed 06/03/21 Page 1 of 1
A new paragraph is hereby inserted to read as follows:All payments provided hereunder are intended to constitute separate payments for purposes ofTreasury Regulation Section 1.409A-2(b)(2). If you are a “specified employee” of theCompany or any affiliate thereof (or any successor entity thereto) within the meaning ofSection 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) onthe date of a Covered Termination, then the Severance Payments shall be delayed until theearlier of: (i) the date that is six (6) months after the date of the Covered Termination,or (ii) the date of your death (such date, the “Delayed Payment Date”), and the Company (orthe successor entity thereto, as applicable) shall pay to you a lump sum amount equal to thesum of the Severance Payments thatotherwise would have been paid to you on or before the Delayed Payment Date, without anyadjustment on account of such delay. Any COBRA premiums paid hereunder are not intended tobe delayed pursuant to Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code and are intended to be paidpursuant to the exception provided by Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(9)(v)(B).     **In Witness Whereof**, the Company and Executive have executed this Amendment on thedates set forth below, to be effective immediately as of the Effective Date.     **Cavium Networks, Inc.**       By: /s/ Syed Ali            Its: CEO            Date: 12/23/08            **Executive**       /s/ Sandeep Vij              Date: 12/23/08
#### MUSGROVE v. STATE.

No. 26286.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 25, 1953.

Fred Whitaker and L. P. Caston, Carthage, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s. Atty., .of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated, as a second offender; the punishment, sixty days in jail and a fine of $500.

Two members of the Highway Patrol and a deputy sheriff testified that they observed a pickup truck being driven erratically and that they brought it to a halt and arrested the appellant, who was the driver thereof. Each of them testified that, in their judgment, appellant was under the influence of intoxicants. They stated that they found a full bottle and a half full bottle of bay rum in the pickup, smelled the contents thereof, and found it to have the same odor as appellant’s breath. The witness Clinton testified that appellant’s breath smelled strongly of alcohol.

Appellant was identified as being the same individual who had been convicted in the prior offense alleged. .

.Appellant did not testify, but offered several witnesses who had seen him before and after his arrest, and they: denied that appellant was intoxicated. The jury re-solyed this fact issue against the appellant, and we find the evidence sufficient to support their verdict.

By bills of exception Nos. 1-3, appellant complains of the testimony of the officers in which they told of finding the bay rum in the pickup truck. Appellant contends that such evidence was not admisr sible. This Court decided this question adversely to appellant’s contention in Wallace v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 625, 170 S.W.2d 762.

Appellant, in his brief, complains of the failure of the State to make certain proof concerning the term of court in which the prior conviction was had. We find a stipulation in the agreed statement of facts which covers such proof.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.