alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MEREDITH v. SHARP et al.

No. A-4177.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 24, 1953.

Smead & Harbour, Longview, for petitioner.

David Moore, Criminal Dist. Atty., and Paul J. McClung, Asst. Criminal Dist. Atty., Longview, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Under our view petitioner has no interest, financially or otherwise, which would authorize him to maintain this suit. Yett v. Cook, 115 Tex. 205, 281 S.W. 837. The trial court should therefore have dismissed the suit rather than deny the writ, ■but since the practical effect of the two orders is the same, no purpose would be served in granting the writ to reform the judgment. The application is therefore stamped Refused. No Reversible Error.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

JONATHAN VILLAREAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF ZROBLACK, LLC;

Plaintiff, 

v.

JOHN SAENZ, MIGUEL VILLARREAL, 

JR., GUNN, LEE & CAVE, P.C.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO. SA-20-CV-00571-OLG

O R D E R

This case is before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer’s Order 

Granting the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiffs Jonathan Villareal and ZroBlack, LLC 

filed by attorneys Charles M.R. Vethan and Joseph Lanza. See Dkt. No. 62 (the “Order”). In the 

Order, Magistrate Judge Farrer directed Plaintiff ZroBlack to obtain counsel and have them enter 

an appearance on the docket within 30 days from the date of the Order to avoid dismissal of its 

claims. Id. On November 18, 2021, Magistrate Judge Farrer issued a report and recommendation 

(the “R&R”), in which he recommended that all claims asserted by Plaintiff ZroBlack against the 

remaining Defendant John Saenz be dismissed for failure to obtain counsel within the time prescribed, pursuant to the Order. See Dkt. No. 75. Magistrate Judge Farrer afforded the parties 

fourteen days to file written objections to the R&R from the date it was served. Id. No party has 

objected to the R&R in the time allotted.

When no party objects to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the Court need not conduct 

a de novo review of the entire record. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make 

a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and 

FILED

DEPUTY 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BY: ________________________________ December 09, 2021

 JU

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG-RBF Document 77 Filed 12/09/21 Page 1 of 2
2 

recommendations to which objection is made.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Rather, the Court need 

only review the magistrate judge’s recommendation to determine whether it is clearly erroneous 

or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). After reviewing 

the R&R and the papers on file in this case, the Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Farrer’s 

report and recommendation is correct and should be adopted. 

It is therefore ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Farrer’s recommendation (Dkt. No. 75) 

is ADOPTED IN FULL. 

It is FURTHER ORDERED that all claims asserted by Plaintiff ZroBlack’s against the 

remaining Defendant Saenz are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

It is so ORDERED. 

SIGNED this ____ day of December, 2021. 

 ____________________________ 

ORLANDO L. GARCIA

Chief United States District Judge

9th

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG-RBF Document 77 Filed 12/09/21 Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONAS FARIN NOGUERA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73974

Agency No. A072-677-018

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted November 5, 2013

San Francisco, California

Before: REINHARDT and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK, District

Judge.** 

Petitioner Jonas Farin Noguera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his

application for cancellation of removal. The IJ denied Noguera’s application on

FILED

NOV 19 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.
the basis that he filed a frivolous application for asylum under 8 U.S.C. §

1158(d)(6), but the BIA reversed the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) determination on

appeal. Instead, the BIA determined that Noguera was ineligible for cancellation

of removal because he provided false testimony under oath, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(6),

and, as a result, could not demonstrate the good moral character necessary to

obtaining cancellation of removal. 

Whether an individual is “under oath” for the purposes of section 1101(f)(6)

is a question of fact. See In re R-S-J-, 22 I. & N. Dec. 863, 871 (BIA 1999)

(remanding to IJ for determination whether individual was under oath). In order to

be “under oath,” an individual must understand the meaning and effect of being

“under oath.” United States v. Bueno-Vargas, 383 F.3d 1104, 1111 (9th Cir.

2004). Despite Noguera’s protests that he did not understand the meaning or effect

of the oath, the IJ failed to find whether or not Noguera met that requirement. 

The BIA’s conclusion that Noguera could not demonstrate good moral

character was based on its assumption that he was “under oath.” The conclusion

must, however, be based on a factual finding. The BIA does not have the authority

to find such facts in the first instance. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3)(iv). Such a finding

must be made by the IJ, and none was made here. Accordingly, we remand to the

BIA with instructions to remand to the IJ to determine in the first instance whether
Noguera understood the meaning and effect of the oath. See INS v. Orlando

Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16–18 (2002) (per curiam). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED.
7/7/2010 Page 1 of 1 

 

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Based on revised engineering report, 7/7/2010, there are no environmental releases, and the PMN is an EAB 

Drop. 

Case Number: P100246 Assessor: Delpire 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES 

Scenario#: Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: 

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE 

Total Releases: 

 

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

Release Days/yr: 

 

Per Site Release: 

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) 

Remarks: EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation 

of an exposure assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch=s (EAB) Initial Review 

Exposure Report (this report).
#### COLLINS v. STATE.

No. 22947.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 8, 1944.

Irwin T. Ward, of Cleburne, for appellant.

*178Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for rape; punishment assessed at five years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts is found in the record and no bills of exception are brought forward complaining of any proceeding during the trial. In this condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
60628 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 198 / Thursday, October 12, 2000 / Notices

[FR Doc. 00–26170 Filed 10–11–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–C

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 00–70]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense

Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of Public

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604–

6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 00–70 with

attached transmittal, policy justification,

and Sensitivity of Technology.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 198 / Thursday, October 12, 2000 / Notices 60629

60630 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 198 / Thursday, October 12, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 198 / Thursday, October 12, 2000 / Notices 60631

60632 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 198 / Thursday, October 12, 2000 / Notices

[FR Doc. 00–26171 Filed 10–11–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–C
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25877]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of this Special 
Emphasis Panel meeting.
    A Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) is a committee of experts selected 
to conduct scientific reviews of applications related to their areas of 
expertise. The committee members are drawn from a list of experts and 
designated to serve for particular individual meetings rather than for 
extended fixed terms of services.
    Substantial segments of this upcoming SEP meeting listed below will 
be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C., 
552b(c)(6). Grant applications are to be reviewed and discussed at this 
meeting. These discussions are likely to include personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the applications. This 
information is exempt from mandatory disclosure under the above-cited 
statutes.

    1. Name of SEP: Health Research Dissemination & Implementation.
    Date: October 23, 2000 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and closed 
for the remainder of the meeting).
    Place: 6010 Building, 4th Floor, Conference Room D, Rockville, 
Maryland 20852.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members or 
minutes of this meeting should contact Ms. Jenny Griffith, Committee 
Management Officer, Office of Research Review, Education and Policy, 
AHRQ, 2101 East Jefferson Street, Suite 400, Rockville, Maryland 
20852, Telephone (301) 594-1847.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: October 2, 2000.
John M. Eisenberg,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-25877 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
EX-10.6


  Exhibit 10.6

   

  April 29, 2021

    

  Richard G. Ghalie, MD, MBA 

  4755 Natalie Drive

  San Diego, CA  92115

   

  Dear Richard,

    

  In connection with your promotion to Chief Medical Officer, this Amendment 2021-1 to your February 17, 2016 employment letter agreement between MEI Pharm, Inc. (the "MEI") and you (the "Employment Letter") hereby amends certain of the terms of the Employment Letter, effective May 3, 2021, unless otherwise noted below, as follows:

    

  1.Your title is Chief Medical Officer.


  2.Your annual base salary will increase to $463,000 to be paid at the rate of $38,583.33 per month.


  3.Your target bonus under MEI's discretionary annual bonus plan will increase to 40% of your base salary, effective for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 2021.


  4.You will receive, effective May 3, 2021, a grant of a nonqualified stock option to purchase 75,000 shares of MEI's common stock, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Amended and Restated MEI Pharma, Inc. 2008 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan and MEI's standard form of nonqualified stock option grant agreement (the "Option"), which provides, in part, that the Option will vest and become exercisable as to 25% of the shares subject to the Option on the first anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining 75% of the shares subject to the Option will vest and become exercisable in substantially equal monthly installments for 36 months thereafter, subject to your continued employment or service through the applicable vesting dates.


  5.The provisions of the Employment Letter entitled "Termination by MEI Other than for Cause" and "Your Termination for Good Reason" are hereby amended to provide that you shall receive a payment in an amount of 12 months of your annual base salary (in effect at the time of termination) and accelerate the vesting of your stock options so that you will be vested in the same number of shares subject to the stock options as if you had continued to be employed by MEI for an additional 12 months.


    

  All other terms of the Employment letter not amended as set forth above shall remain in full force and effect.

    

  Sincerely,

   

  /s/ Daniel P. Gold                

  Daniel P. Gold, Ph.D.

  President & CEO

  MEI Pharma, Inc.

    

    

  							
	Agreed and accepted:
	 
	/s/ Richard G. Ghalie
	 
	Date:
	 
	April 29, 2021

	 
	 
	Richard G. Ghalie, MD, MBA
	 
	 
	 
	 



    

    

    

    

    

    

   

   

  11455 El Camino Real, Suite 250, San Diego, CA 92130

  Tel: 858 369 7100 Fax: 858 369 7101 Website: www.meipharma.com
#### Arthur JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27172.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 17, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

-The offense is the unlawful possession of wine for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of- $200.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 195 (Friday, October 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25783]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3430]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Painting Revolution: Kandinsky, Malevich and the 
Russian Avant-Garde''

AGENCY: United States Department of State.


ACTION: Amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 25, 2000, Notice was published on page 45814 of the 
Federal Register (Volume 65, Number 143) by the Department of State 
pursuant to Pub. L 3370 relating to the exhibit ``Painting Revolution: 
Kandinsky, Malevich and the Russian Avant-Garde.'' The referenced 
Notice is amended as follows. Replace ``July 9, 2001'' with ``July 29, 
2001.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Jacqueline Caldwell, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
619-6982). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: September 27, 2000.
William B. Bader,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-25783 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,384
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,730
<INVENTORY>                                     62,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               153,333
<PP&E>                                          82,887
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 258,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,940
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,154
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,666
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   258,126
<SALES>                                         71,884
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,884
<CGS>                                           37,854
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,854
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,328
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (686)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    274
<INCOME-TAX>                                       110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                164
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       164
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-27-000]

Take notice that on October 4, 2000 pursuant to Rule 206 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.206), Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) filed a Section 5 Complaint against El Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso).

Specifically, SoCalGas requests the Commission to issue an order: (1) Finding that the SoCalGas/Topock delivery point is fully subscribed on a firm primary basis (without determining which shippers hold firm primary capacity), and was fully subscribed when capacity was awarded commencing January 1, 2000 (Open Season) and subsequently; (2) directing El Paso to cease and desist violating express orders and regulations by continuing to sell firm primary capacity at the SoCalGas/Topock delivery point since no such capacity is available and (3) directing El Paso to schedule capacity acquired during the Open Season and subsequently into the SoCalGas/Topock delivery point on a secondary basis only.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests must be filed on or before October 25, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or before October 25, 2000.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-26285  Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Kof Advanced Life Sciences Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscalyear ending December 31, 2005 (the “Report”), I, Michael T. Flavin, Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to the extent applicable; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

|        | Date: March 15, 2006                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ MICHAEL T. FLAVIN                       |
|   | Michael T. Flavin                           |
|   | *Chief Executive Officer*                   |
|   | ADVANCED LIFE SCIENCES  HOLDINGS, INC. |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25842]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-581-000]


Transwestern Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

October 3, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Transwestern Pipeline 
Company (Transwestern), tendered for filing to become part of 
Transwestern's FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the 
following tariff sheet proposed to become effective on November 1, 
2000:

Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 5B.02

    Transwestern's Stipulation and Agreement filed on May 2, 1995, in 
Docket Nos. RP95-271 et al., as amended by Transwestern's Stipulation 
and Agreement filed on May 21, 1996, provided for adjustments to the 
Settlement Base Rates (SBRs) beginning November 1, 1998.
    Transwestern states that the purpose of this filing is to set forth 
the factors and calculations used in determining the adjustments to the 
SBRs and to revise the SBRs to be effective November 1, 2000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to be come a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-25842 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M