alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
pententable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of person privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: October 27, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 am to 1 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Gaithersburg Holiday Inn, Gaithersburg, MD 20879.
    Contact Person: Vassil S. Georgiev, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID, NIH, Room 2217, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC, 
7610, Bethesda, MD 20892-7610, 301-496-2550.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)


    Dated: September 29, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-25888 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2921

___________

Winston Morrison, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri. 

United States of America, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: February 18, 1999

 Filed: February 24, 1999

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Winston Morrison, a citizen of Freeport, Grand Bahamas, appeals the district

court’s1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, in which he claimed his counsel was

ineffective at resentencing for failing to raise his deportable-alien status as a basis for

downward departure. Upon de novo review, see United States v. Duke, 50 F.3d 571,

576 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 885 (1995), we conclude denial was warranted.

Among other things, Morrison cannot show he suffered prejudice by his counsel’s

alleged deficient performance, because the district court indicated it would not have
-2-

granted Morrison a downward departure on the basis of his alien status. See Auman

v. United States, 67 F.3d 157, 162 (8th Cir. 1995) (counsel’s failure to object at

sentencing to use of prior conviction as predicate offense was not ineffective

assistance because no credible evidence pointed to conclusion that district court

would have changed its ruling based on objection from counsel).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
ORIX                                                                                                       

ORIX Capital Markets, LLC

March 14, 2003

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATION

SERVICER

Ladies & Gentlemen:

ORIX Capital Markets, LLC, f/k/a ORIX Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC ("OCM"), as Servicer, is providing you the required documentation pursuant to the terms outlined in that certain Pooling and Servicing  Agreement  ("Agreement") dated  as of  June 1, 2002,  relating  to  Morgan Stanley Dean Witter  Capital  I Inc.,  Commercial  Mortgage  Pass Through Certificates  Series  2002 IQ2.  The applicable sections of the Agreement are referenced in the attached Exhibit A.

The undersigned officer, on behalf of OCM, hereby informs you that  (i) a review of the activities of  OCM and of its performance under this Agreement has been made for the  period  commencing  January 1, 2002 and ending on December 31, 2002, (ii) to the best of undersigned's knowledge,  based on such review, OCM has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement throughout such period, (iii) there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation, (iv) to the best of undersigned's knowledge, each related sub servicer has fulfilled its obligation under its sub servicing agreement in all material respects, and (v) OCM has not received any notice regarding qualification, or challenging the status, of the Upper Tier REMIC or Lower Tier REMIC as a REMIC from the IRS or any other governmental agency or body.

Also, please find attached 1) an Annual Independent Public Accountants' Servicing Report performed by KPMG LLP, relative to the assets serviced by OCM for the period beginning January   1, 2002 through December 31, 2002, and 2) OCM's Servicing Officer list.

Duplicates of this Annual Performance Certification, and any supporting documents, are being simultaneously sent to all parties listed on Exhibit B for receipt by March 30, 2003.

If you have any questions or comments relative to the attached documents, please call me at 214       237 2192.

Sincerely,

ORIX Capital Markets, LLC

Servicer

By:  ***Shelia Thomas
	Shelia Thomas

	Portfolio Manager

Attachments:	Exhibit A

		Exhibit B

 

 

 

 

1717 Main Street, Suite 900, Dallas, Texas 75201

TEL: 800 887 6781  FAX: 214 237 2046***
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00454-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00455-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00455-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00456-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00457-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00458-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00459-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00460-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00461-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00462-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00463-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00464-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00465-ADA

WSOU’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE REGARDING EXCHANGE OF PROPOSED 

CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Pursuant to the Court’s Version 3.2 of the Court’s Order Governing proceedings entered 

November 5, 2020, and in accordance with the Court’s Scheduling Order, Plaintiff hereby notifies 

the Court Plaintiff has served its proposed claim constructions on Defendant Microsoft 

Corporation via electronic mail on December 4, 2020. 

Case 6:20-cv-00455-ADA Document 40 Filed 12/04/20 Page 1 of 2
Date: December 4, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Mark D. Siegmund_____ 

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive 

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

Counsel for Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered 

electronically via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, 

on this the 4th day of December 2020.

/s/ Mark D. Siegmund

Mark D. Siegmund

Case 6:20-cv-00455-ADA Document 40 Filed 12/04/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5310 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5310

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on sorbic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on sorbic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SORBIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.25 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to sorbic acid) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATIONS**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE *SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

I, Shuo Lou,  Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that this report on Form 10-KSB/A of China Properties Developments,  Inc. for the period ending December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in this report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the  financial  condition  and results of operations of  China Properties Developments,  Inc. September 27, 2006/s/ Shuo Lou                                           Shuo Lou, Chief Financial Officer and 				Chief Accounting Officer				China Properties Developments, Inc. 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.B** **CERTIFICATION**     I, John R. Sult, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of Southern Natural Gas Company;     2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this Report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this Report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this Report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 7, 2007 /s/  *John    R. Sult*    John R. Sult    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer    and Controller    (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)    Southern Natural Gas Company
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-48,559-18

EX P ARTE JAMES THO MAS G REEN, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 715266-H IN THE 248 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Tex as C o d e o f Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y o u n g , 4 1 8 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenc ed to thirty -five y ea rs’ imprisonment. The Four teenth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Gree n v. State , No. 14-96-01536- CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14t h Dist.] J an. 28, 1999, pet. re f’d) (not desig nated f or publication). In his prese nt application, Applicant raises four g rounds. This application, h o w e v e r , p r esents

a more serious question. This Court’s re co rd s re fl ect that Applicant has filed seven prior2

applications perta ining to this conviction. It is obvious from the rec ord that Applicant continues to raise issues that have been prese nted and reje cted in previous applications or that should have been prese nted in previous applications. The writ of habea s corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders v. U.S. , 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr , 511 S.W .2d 5 2 3 (T ex. Crim. App. 1974). Be cause of his repe titive claims, we hold that Applicant ’s claims are barr ed from revie w under Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandone d by his abuse of the writ

. This application is dismiss ed. There fore , we inst ruct the Clerk of the C ourt of C riminal Appea ls not t o ac ce p t or file the instant application for a writ of habea s corpus, or any future application perta ining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims prese nted have not been raised previously and that they could not have been prese nted in a previous application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Bilton , 602 S.W .2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980). Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Filed: January

30, 2019 Do not publish
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 4, 2018

p1126 

# Order

Clerk December 4, 2018

157502

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157502

COA: 335843

Lapeer CC: 15

- 012331

- FH

RICHARD CHARLES MALLORY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
1 

### Maurin, Lawrence

From: Maurin, Lawrence

Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 8:58 AM

To: 'tbillie@navajo-nsn.gov'

Subject: SRP Navajo Gen. Station - Coal Treatmen t System Project - NHPA Initiation of

Consultation

Attachments: Attachment 3 NGS SRP Minor Mod App lication 2-20-2015.pdf; Attachment 4

NGSMinorModModeling.pdf; Initia tion_of_Consultation_10_23_2015.pdf

Dear Tamara,

I have attached U.S. EPA’s request for initiation of consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act for Salt

River Project’s proposed Coal Treatment System project at Navajo Generating Station near Page, AZ.

I have also included for your reference the application for a Minor New Source Review Permit and Air Emissions

Modeling Analysis. We request that your office review the attached information and express interest in any further

consultation with EPA by November 30, 2015.

Attachments 1 and 2 have been omitted due to attachment size limits, however, these maps are contained within

attachments 3 and 4.

We have also forwarded hard copies of these documents to your office addressed to:

Ora Marek

‐ Martinez

Department Manager

Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department

PO Box 4950

Window Rock, Arizona 86515

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Larry Maurin

Larry Maurin

Air Permits Office (AIR

‐ 3)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

(415) 972-3943 (phone) / (415) 947-3579 (fax)

Maurin.Lawrence@epa.gov
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 29, 2021

No. 04-21-00228-CR

Jeffrey Allen CHANEY,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. A20152

Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 Appellant’s second motion for an extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s brief is due on or before November 24, 2021; however, no further extensions will be 

granted absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of October, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 17 , 2017

. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 00055

- CR No. 05

- 17

- 00056

- CR

TIMMIE LEE JENNINGS , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F15

- 76430

- R & F15

- 76431

- R



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Myers, and Brown Opinion by Justice Brown

Timme Lee Jennings plead ed guilty to two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child
younger than fourteen years of age

. Pursuant to plea agreement s , the trial court sentenced
appellant to twenty years’ imprisonment in each case. Appellant waived his right to appeal as

part of the agreements. See Blanco v. State , 18 S.W.3d 218, 219

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).
The trial court certified both that appellant has no right to appeal the plea bargains and that he
waived his right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a), (d); Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610
(Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
By letter dated January 25, 2017, we questioned our jurisdiction in light of the above
facts. Appellant conceded he waived his right to appeal, and the State agreed.– 2

– Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish
T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2

170055F.U05 /Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

TIMMIE LEE JENNINGS, Appellant

No. 05

- 17

- 00055

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F15

- 76430

- R. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Justices Bridges and Myers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered this 17th day of February, 2017.– 4

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

TIMMIE LEE JENNINGS, Appellant

No. 05

- 17

- 00056

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15

- 76431

- R. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Justices Bridges and Myers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered th is 17th day of February, 2017.
**Exhibit 12.2****Certification**I, David Mitchell, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Viatel Holding (Bermuda) Limited;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for thecompany and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting;5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting; andDate: December 14, 2005