alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS AND INCOME STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED
HEREWITH.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000092116
<NAME> SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      471,013
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     11,418
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          54,481
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        29,259
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 566,171
<COMMON>                                        25,195
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      100,193
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             67,529
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 192,917
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              400
<PREFERRED>                                      1,600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           166,921
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              14,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      180
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           40
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        462
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    40
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 190,131
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  566,171
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      139,425
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            12,004
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     101,902
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     113,906
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         25,519
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  67
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  25,586
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        10,553
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,033
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         64
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   14,969
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         8,955
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          24,483
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.63


</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5398 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Topremazone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Topremazone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TOPREMAZONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 [3-(4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazol3-yl)-4-mesyl-o-tolyl](5-hydroxy-1-methylpyrazol-4- 

yl)methanone 

(Topremazone) (CAS No. 

210631–68–8) (provided 

for in subheading 

2934.99.15) ....................... 3.5% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5398 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* The State of Illinois notified this court that it was never served with process in the district court and would not be filing a brief or otherwise participating in this appeal. After examining the appellant’s brief and the record , we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Accordingly, the appeal is submi tted on the appellant’s brief and the record. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 34(a)(2). 

# United 

# States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted December 19, 2007 *

Decided December 26, 2007

Before Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge No. 07-3049 LARRY M. BANKS, Petitioner-Appellant ,

v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Defendant-Appellee

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division No. 07 C 0547 Ronald A. Guzman, Judge

. O R D E R In November 2006 Larry Banks was indicted in Illinois state court on fourteen different charges, including four counts of attempted first-degree murder. While being held at the Elgin Mental Health Center awaiting trial, Banks filed what he styled as a petition for a writ of mandamus, see 28 U.S.C. §§ 1361, 1651, in NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 07-3049 Page 2 federal district court. He argued only that the state prosecution violates his rights under the Illinois constitution, and that accordingly the federal court should intervene and stop the ongoing state proceedings. The district court allowed Banks to proceed in forma pauperis but then dismissed the action sua sponte for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court reasoned that it did not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against state officials for violations of state law. Our review is de novo, see Hoskins v. Lenear , 395 F.3d 372, 375 (7th Cir. 2005), and we agree that the district court lacked “jurisdiction to issue a mandamus against state officials for violating their duties under state law,” Coniston Corp. v. Vill. of Hoffman Estates , 844 F.2d 461, 469 (7th Cir. 1988); see also In re Campbell , 264 F.3d 730, 731 (7th Cir. 2001). The district court warned Banks that if a “prisoner has had a total of three federal cases or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious or failing to state a claim, he may not file suit in federal court without prepaying the filing fee unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury.” See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); see also Martin v. United States , 96 F.3d 853, 854 (7th Cir. 1996) (holding that Prisoner Litigation Reform Act applies to civil mandamus actions). Despite this warning, Banks brought this appeal. Banks incurred one of his allotted three “strikes” for his petition in the district court, and this appeal counts as a second. AFFIRMED.
----

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 February 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling by the Bundesfinanzhof — Hans-Jürgen Ritter-Coulais, Monique Ritter-Coulais v Finanzamt Germersheim

(Case C-152/03) (1)

(Tax legislation - Income tax - Article 48 EEC (subsequently Article 48 EC, now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) - National rules restricting recognition of rental income losses from immovable property situated in another Member State)

(2006/C 131/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Hans-Jürgen Ritter-Coulais, Monique Ritter-Coulais

Defendant: Finanzamt Germersheim

Re:

REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Articles 43 and 56 EC — National legislation on personal income tax limiting the right to deduct rental income losses from immovable property and applying the negative tax progression clause only to those losses relating to property situated in the national territory

Operative part of the judgment

Article 48 of the EEC Treaty (subsequently Article 48 of the EC Treaty and now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which does not permit natural persons in receipt of income from employment in one Member State, and assessable to tax on their total income there, to have income losses relating to their own use of a private dwelling in another Member State taken into account for the purposes of determining the rate of taxation applicable to their income in the former state, whereas positive rental income relating to such a dwelling is taken into account.

----

(1)OJ C 158, 05.07.2003

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2148

RENEE L. MCCRAY,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Respondent – Appellee,

and

CHARLES R. GOLDSTEIN,

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:20-cv-00973-SAG)

Submitted: April 1, 2021 Decided: April 14, 2021

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Renee L. McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah E. Meyer, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON 

(US) LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Renee L. McCray appeals the district court’s orders (1) affirming the bankruptcy 

court’s denial of McCray’s motion to reopen her bankruptcy proceeding, and (2) denying 

her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCray v. Wells Fargo 

Bank, N.A., No. 1:20-cv-00973-SAG (D. Md. Sept. 17, 2020; Oct. 16, 2020). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 03, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 03, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0233. DANIEL ERIC COBBLE v. DENICE D. FACHINI. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: NONE
**Exhibit      23.1**

**Consent      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

|  | (i) | Registration                Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-110646) of Oragenics, Inc. pertaining                to the                Oragenics, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive                Plan; |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (ii) | Post                Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3                to                Form SB-2 (No. 333-100568) and related Prospectus of Oragenics, Inc.                for                the registration of 297,724 shares of its common stock issuable upon                exercise of warrants; and |
|--|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (iii) | Registration                Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-131015) and related Prospectus of Oragenics,                Inc. for the registration of 7,205,000 shares of its common                stock. |
|--|-------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 195 (Friday, October 6, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 59796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25736]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2215, MM Docket No. 00-184, RM-9955]


Digital Television Broadcast Service; Sheridan, WY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by 
Duhamel Broadcasting Enterprises, licensee of Station KSGW-TV, NTSC 
Channel 12, Sheridan, Wyoming, proposing the substitution of DTV 
Channel 13 for Station KSGW-TV's assigned DTV Channel 21. DTV Channel 
21 can be allotted to Sheridan, Wyoming, in compliance with the 
principle community coverage requirements of section 73.625(a) at 
reference coordinates (44-37-20 N. and 107-06-57 W.). As requested, we 
propose to allot DTV Channel 13 to Sheridan with a power of 50 and a 
height above average terrain (HAAT) of 372 meters.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before November 27, 2000, and reply 
comments on or before December 12, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with 
the FCC, interested parties should serve the petitioner, or its counsel 
or consultant, as follows: Richard R. Zaragoza, Colette M. Capretz, 
Shaw Pittman, 2300 N Street, NW, Washington, DC 20037-1128 (Counsel for 
Duhamel Broadcasting Enterprises).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 00-184, adopted October 
3, 2000, and released October 4, 2000. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that from the 
time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no 
longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all ex 
parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this 
one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules 
governing permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-25736 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<TABLE>

                                                                                                                   EXHIBIT 12

                                            SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
                                  COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                                   Dollars in Millions


                                          SIX MONTHS ENDED 
                                              JUNE 30,                               YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
<CAPTION>
                                        -----------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------
                                             1998        1997        1997       1996         1995         1994         1993
                                        -----------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                      <C>          <C>        <C>         <C>          <C>        <C>           <C>

Income Before Income Taxes,
Extraordinary
   Loss and Cumulative Effect of
   Accounting Changes                     $  1,278    $    996   $   1,888   $   2,168    $   1,688   $    1,586   $    1,424
     Add:Interest Expense                      182         169         343         327          340          358          385
         1/3 Rental Expense                     21          19          41          33           26           25           23
                                          ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------   ----------  -----------  -----------

     Adjusted Earnings                    $  1,481    $  1,184   $   2,272   $   2,528    $   2,054   $    1,969   $    1,832
                                          =========   =========  ==========  ==========   ==========  ===========  ===========

Total Interest Charges                    $    194    $    181   $     370   $     348    $     340   $      358   $      385
1/3 Rental Expense                              21          19          41          33           26           25           23
                                          ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------   ----------  -----------  -----------

     Adjusted Fixed Charges               $    215    $    200   $     411   $     381    $     366   $      383   $      408
                                          =========   =========  ==========  ==========   ==========  ===========  ===========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges            6.89        5.92        5.53        6.64         5.61         5.14         4.49

</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5256 

To suspend temporarily the duty on hand tools designed for securing plastic 

fasteners. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. NEAL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on hand tools designed 

for securing plastic fasteners. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HAND TOOLS DESIGNED FOR SECURING PLAS4 TIC FASTENERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Hand tools designed for securing plastic fasteners 

(provided for in subheading 8205.59.80) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5256 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC 

 

v. Case No.: 6:20-cv-00454-ADA 

 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 

ORDER 

BE IT REMEMBERED on this day, there was presented to the Court the Motion for Admission 

Pro Hac Vice filed by Shawn Blackbum (“Applicant”), counsel for WSOU Investments LLC, and the 

Court, having reviewed the motion, enters the following order: 

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED, and Applicant 

may appear on behalf of WSOU Investments LLC in the above case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately 

tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local 

Court Rule AT-1(f)(2). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the corresponding Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice was 

e-filed, the attorney who filed the Motion on behalf of the Applicant is directed to notify the Applicant 

of this order. 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Applicant, pursuant to the Administrative Policies and 

Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal cases in the Western District of Texas, shall 

register as a filing user within 10 days of the date of this Order, if he/she has not previously done so on 

a prior case in this District. 

SIGNED this the 8th day of October, 2021. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 100 Filed 10/08/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACOACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL

INC., EMC CORPORATION

Defendant

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00477-ADA

ORDER SETTING MotionOTION Hearing HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is SETET for

MOTION HEARING, in U.S. Magistrate Court, Courtroom No. 2, Third Floor, 800 Franklin Avenue,

Waco,aco Texas, on August 11, 2022 at 02:00 PM.

14th day of July, 2022.

Derek T. Gilliland

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA-DTG Document 218 Filed 07/14/22 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99(i)(1)


           CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of 7-Eleven, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, James W. Keyes, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, as required by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



                              /s/ James W. Keyes
                              ---------------------
                              James W. Keyes
                              President and Chief Executive Officer
                              7-Eleven, Inc.

















                                   Tab 3
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Double Diamond, Inc., * From the 29 th District Court

Double Diamond Management of Palo Pinto County

Corporation, Double Diamond Trial Court No. C47833

Utilities Co., Cliffs Golf, Inc.,

and Mike R. Ward,

Vs. No. 11

- 18

- 00105

- CV * January 10, 2019

Dan Dipprey, Curtis Priddy, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Ken Hill, and Ken Hill Investment (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Group, Inc. Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

( Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, in accordance with this

court’s opinion, the appe al is dismissed.