alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|North Dakota Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|North Dakota Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 9      | 51     | 1      | 12     | 1      | 60     | 44     | 28     | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 53     | 126    | 264    | 15     | 626    | 180    | 275    | 241    | 115    | 3     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 500    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Prepared by R. Huntley, EMB EMC TID-009

Technical Support Division, OAQPS, EPA September 9, 1991

EMISSION MEASUREMENT CENTER

TECHNICAL INFORMATION DOCUMENT 

BACKGROUND

The methods for measuring PM10 emissions, Methods 201 and 201A, were

promulgated on April 17, 1990 (55 FR 14246). The Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) stated in the preamble that "The PM10 methods are not

recommended for stacks with entrained moisture droplets because water drops

larger than PM10, which are captured by the PM 10 cyclone, may contain

particles which normally would be counted as PM10."

Since promulgation, there have been many questions on how to measure PM10

emissions in the presence of water droplets, such as after a wet scrubber.

RECOMMENDATION

Methods 201 and 201A are not applicable for in-stack PM10 measurement in

stack gases containing water droplets. Where water droplets are known to

exist in the emissions and when PM10 measurement is desired, EPA recommends

that Method 5 (or a comparable method) be used and its particulate catch

be considered as PM10 emissions.
H. R. 514 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven 

An Act 

To extend expiring provisions of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 and Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 

relating to access to business records, individual terrorists as agents of foreign 

powers, and roving wiretaps until December 8, 2011. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FISA Sunsets Extension Act 

of 2011’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUNSETS OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO ACCESS 

TO BUSINESS RECORDS, INDIVIDUAL TERRORISTS AS 

AGENTS OF FOREIGN POWERS, AND ROVING WIRETAPS. 

(a) USA PATRIOT IMPROVEMENT AND REAUTHORIZATION ACT

OF 2005.—Section 102(b)(1) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement 

and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–177; 50 U.S.C. 

1805 note, 50 U.S.C. 1861 note, and 50 U.S.C. 1862 note) is amended 

by striking ‘‘February 28, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘May 27, 2011’’. 

(b) INTELLIGENCE REFORM AND TERRORISM PREVENTION ACT

OF 2004.—Section 6001(b)(1) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 108–458; 118 Stat. 

3742; 50 U.S.C. 1801 note) is amended by striking ‘‘February 28, 

2011’’ and inserting ‘‘May 27, 2011’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Donald ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27115.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 26, 1954.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is robbery; the punishment, 15 years.

Accompanying the record is an affidavit in proper form executed by appellant requesting the dismissal of the appeal.

The request, is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 4

Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 48-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 48-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

KPMG LLP
50 North Front Street, Suite 900
Memphis, TN 38103


February 27, 2004

Ladies and Gentlemen:

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, First Horizon Home
Loan Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Tennessee
Mortgage Services, Inc., which includes a consolidated investment
in FH-FF Mortgage Services, L.P., (the Company) complied in all
material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage Bankers Association of Americas Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same
period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond policy in the
amount of $100 million and an errors and omissions policy in
the amount of $75 million.


/s/ Peter F. Makowiecki
------------------------
Peter F. Makowiecki
Chief Financial Officer

First Horizon Home Loan Corporation
4000 Horizon Way
Irving, TX 75063
Phone: 214-441-5313
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC., 

AND ZTE (TX), INC. 

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-487

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-488

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-489

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-490

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-491

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-492

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-493

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-494

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-495

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-496

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-497

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY OPPOSING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER

Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC doing business as Brazos Licensing and 

Development (“WSOU”) respectfully requests leave to file the attached Sur-reply 

Opposing Defendants’ Motions to Transfer. Plaintiff’s request leave to file a sur-reply 

because Defendants make new arguments and allegations in their reply brief. Because these 

allegations and arguments were not included in Defendants’ opening brief, Plaintiff had no 

opportunity to address them in its response. Plaintiff’s proposed sur-reply is 5 pages and 

addresses only allegations and arguments raised for the first time in Defendants’ reply 

brief. The parties conferred regarding this motion by phone on November 20, 2020 and by 

email on November 22, 2020. Defendants’ oppose this motion.

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 43 Filed 11/27/20 Page 1 of 3
2

Dated: November 27, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Ryan Loveless

James L. Etheridge

Texas State Bar No. 24059147

Ryan S. Loveless

Texas State Bar No. 24036997

Brett A. Mangrum

Texas State Bar No. 24065671

Travis Lee Richins

Texas State Bar No. 24061296

ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Telephone: (817) 470-7249

Facsimile: (817) 887-5950

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com

Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com

Mark D. Siegmund

State Bar No. 24117055

mark@waltfairpllc.com

Law Firm of Walt, Fair PLLC.

1508 North Valley Mills Drive

Waco, Texas 76710

Telephone: (254) 772-6400

Facsimile: (254) 772-6432

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on November 27, 2020 a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

document was served upon all counsel of record via email under this Court’s Local Rules.

/s/ Travis Richins

Travis Richins

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 43 Filed 11/27/20 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that the parties conferred regarding this motion by phone on November 20, 

2020 and by email on November 22, 2020. Defendants oppose this motion.

/s/ Travis Richins

Travis Richins

Case 6:20-cv-00487-ADA Document 43 Filed 11/27/20 Page 3 of 3
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Group Ventures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report"), I, Raoul Tsakok, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | By: | /s/ Raoul Tsakok     
| | --- | ---------------------
| |     | Raoul Tsakok         
| |     | Chairman & CEO       
| |     |                      
| |     | Date: August 26, 2010

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, 

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00474-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

LETTERS OF REQUEST FOR FOREIGN DISCOVERY FROM CANADA
1 

Defendants’, Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., and EMC Corporation, (collectively 

“Defendants”), seek foreign discovery from third party witnesses residing in British Columbia, 

Canada. Defendants have attached Appendices with Letters of Request which include Document 

Requests and Deposition Topics. The chart below outlines the names of the witnesses or entities

Defendants seek foreign discovery from, the relevant case number, and the Patent at issue. 

Appx. Name of Witness 

Entity

Relevance of 

Witness/Entity Case No. U.S. Pat. No. 

A Radu C. Ungureanu Named Inventor 6:20-cv-00474 7,212,536 

B Yuming Wen Named Inventor 6:20-cv-00474 7,212,536 

Defendants respectfully request that the Court execute the Letters of Request attached as 

Appendices A–B. Defendants further request that, after the Court has signed the Letters of 

Request, the Clerk of this Court authenticate the Court’s signature under the seal of this Court, 

and return the original signed and sealed executed Letters, and two certified copies of the signed 

and sealed executed Letters, to Defendants’ counsel, Barry K. Shelton, for delivery to the proper 

authority. 

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, indicated 

that it reserves the right to serve its own foreign discovery in the future. 
2 

Dated: November 6, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029 

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com 

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205 

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165 

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Benjamin Hershkowitaz 

bhershkowitz@gibsondunn.com 

Brian A. Rosenthal 

brosenthal@gibsondunn.com 

Allen Kathir

akathir@gibsondunn.com 

Kyanna Sabanoglu

ksabanoglu@gibsondunn.com 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Ave. 

New York, NY 10166-0193 

Telephone: (212) 351-4000 

Facsimile: (212) 351-4035 

Y. Ernest Hsin

ehsin@gibsondunn.com

Jaysen S. Chung

jschung@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

555 Mission St., Ste. 3000

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921

Telephone: (415) 393-8200

Facsimile: (415) 393-8306

Ryan K. Iwahashi

riwahashi@gibsondunn.com 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

1881 Page Mill Rd. 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1211 

Telephone: (650) 849-5300 

Facsimile: (650) 849-5333 

Attorneys for Defendants
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 6, 2020, all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the 

Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Deborah Laufer, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

TEMPLE JOINT VENTURE LLC, 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00390-

ADA-JCM

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL [FRCP 41(A)] AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby notifies this Court 

pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i) that this action is dismissed with prejudice as 

to all claims, causes of action, and parties, with each party bearing that party’s 

own attorney’s fees and costs.

Dated: June 3, 2020 

/s/ Tristan W. Gillespie

Tristan W. Gillespie, Esq.

THOMAS B. BACON, P.A.

5150 Cottage Farm Rd.

Johns Creek, GA 30022

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, 

DEBORAH LAUFER

Case 6:20-cv-00390-ADA-JCM Document 8 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(i), IT IS ORDERED 

THAT THIS ACTION BE, AND HEREBY IS, DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE as to all claims, causes of action, and parties, with each party 

bearing that party’s own attorney’s fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to 

close the file. 

Dated: June 3, 2020

 ___________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00390-ADA-JCM Document 8 Filed 06/03/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Sterling Bancorp, a New York corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that: The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008 (the
Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. Dated:
August 11, 2008
/s/ Louis J. CappelliName: Louis J. CappelliTitle: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 49
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5522 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5522

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic 
 acid, polymer with N,N'Bis(2-aminoethyl)-1,2-ethanediamine, cyclized, 
                             methosulfate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic 
 acid, polymer with N,N'Bis(2-aminoethyl)-1,2-ethanediamine, cyclized, 
                             methosulfate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,4-BENZENEDICARBOXYLIC ACID, POLYMER WITH N,N'BIS(2-
              AMINOETHYL)-1,2-ETHANEDIAMINE, CYCLIZED, METHOSULFATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.93 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic 
acid, polymer with N,N'Bis(2-aminoethyl)-1,2-ethanediamine, cyclized, 
methosulfate) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
GO\ . .... {NMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF CO MBIA District Department ofthe Environment

Office ofthe Director

June 3, 2013 Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III (Mail Code: 3RAOO) 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

# *** JY

Subject: Submittal ofthe Washington DC-MD-VA 1997 Annual PM2.s Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan as a SIP Revision Dear Mr. Garvin: Pursuantto the authority set forth in the District ofColumbiaAir Pollution Control Act of 1984 as amended, effective March 15, 1985 (D.C. Law 5-165; D.C. Official Code§§ 8-101.01 etseq. (2008 Repl. & 2012 Supp.)), the District Department ofthe Environment Establishment Act of 2005, as amended, effective February 15,2006 (D.C. Law 16-51; D.C. Official Code§§ 8- 151.01 etseq. (2008 Repl. & 2012 Supp.)); Mayor's Order 98-44, dated AprillO, 1998, Mayor's Order 98-45, dated AprillO, 1998, and Mayor's Order 2006-61, dated June 14, 2006, the District ofColumbiais hereby requesting approval ofthe Washington DC-MD-VA Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for the 1997 annual fine particulate matter (PM2.s) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). The following are attached:
• One paper copy ofthe Redesignation Request; 

### RECFIVED 

## JUN 

## 12 2013
• One paper copy ofthe Maintenance Plan; Division [J ·el ·r (''APOO) • One paper copy ofeach ofAppendices B1, C1, D, and E; 11
,,u .:> • One electronic copy ofAppendices AI, A2, B2, and C2 (due to the nature ofthe content and the size ofthe files); • The Public Hearing Notice; • The Hearing Officer's Certification; and • One disk containing an electronic version ofthe entire SIP revision. The electronic version includes an exact duplicate ofthe paper copy ofthe SIP revision submittal. This plan is being submitted because the District ofColumbia (District, or DC), the State of Maryland (Maryland, or MD), and the Commonwealth ofVirginia (Virginia, or VA) request that the Washington DC-MD-VA nonattainment area be redesignated to attainment, pursuant to the provisions under § 107 ofthe federal Clean Air Act. The District, Maryland, and Virginia also request that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concurrently approve, as a revision to the state implementation plan (SIP) for each state, the related§ 175A maintenance plan.

DISTRiCT

# ~ .. greenforward 

# * DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1200 First St. NE, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 200021 tel: 202.535.2600 

### Iweb:ddoe.dc.govShould you have any questions orrequire additional information, please contact me at (202) 535- 2615, or Ms. Cecily Beall, Associate Director for the Air Quality Division, at (202) 535-2626.

Enclosure
cc: DianaEsher, Director, Air Protection Division, EPA Region 3 Cecily Beall, Associate Director, Air Quality Division, DDOE
Case 3:20-cv-00154-DB Document 42 Filed 05/07/21 Page 1 of 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5523 

To suspend temporarily the duty on fuel injectors each functional in a 

common rail fuel system with a pressure greater than 1200 bar. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on fuel injectors each functional in a common rail fuel system with a pressure 

greater than 1200 bar. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FUEL INJECTORS EACH FUNCTIONAL IN A 

4 COMMON RAIL FUEL SYSTEM WITH A PRES5 SURE GREATER THAN 1200 BAR. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5523 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Fuel injectors each functional in a common rail 

fuel system with a pressure 

greater than 1200 bar 

(provided for in subheading 8481.80.90) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5486 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on outer soles and heels, of rubber 

or plastics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on outer soles and 

heels, of rubber or plastics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OUTER SOLES AND HEELS, OF RUBBER OR 

4 PLASTICS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Outer soles and heels, of 

rubber or plastics (provided for in subheading 

6406.20.00) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5486 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS