alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.9


 


Guaranty
of Pie Squared Pizza, LLC


 


IN
CONSIDERATION OF, and as an inducement for, PizzaRev Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Rev Acquisition”),
entering into that certain Unit Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2021 (the “Purchase Agreement”), with Pie
Squared Investment, LLC (“Squared Investment”), and Amergent Hospitality Group, Inc. (“AHG”), Pie
Squared Pizza, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Guarantor”), does hereby absolutely and unconditionally
guarantee the full payment of all monetary obligations (collectively, the “Guaranteed Obligations”) arising under
or in connection with the Note (this and each other capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning assigned thereto
in the Purchase Agreement) in accordance with the terms of the Note.


 


1.
The obligation of Guarantor hereunder may be enforced against Guarantor whether or not Rev Acquisition first proceeds against AHG
under the Note.


 


2.
 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, nothing in this Guaranty (this “Guaranty”) of Guarantor
shall grant to Rev Acquisition any right of action against the Guarantor unless an Event of Default (as defined in the Note) has
occurred and is continuing.


 


3.
Guarantor hereby consents that Rev Acquisition may, in its sole discretion, without affecting the liability of Guarantor, in
whole or in part and as often as Rev Acquisition may wish (a) renew, extend, modify, accelerate, reduce the amount of, change the
time for payment of, or otherwise change the terms of the Note, (b) waive, fail to enforce, settle, release (by operating of law or
otherwise), compromise, collect or liquidate in any manner any of the Guaranteed Obligations, and/or (c) take and hold security for
the payment of the Guaranteed Obligations.


 


4.
 Guarantor shall have no right of subrogation and does hereby waive any right to participate in any security now or hereafter
held by Rev Acquisition. Guarantor further does hereby waive any right to contribution from AHG.


 


5. Rev Acquisition may, without notice, assign this Guaranty or the Note in whole or in part, and no assignment or transfer of this
Guaranty or the Note shall operate to extinguish or diminish the liability of Guarantor hereunder. This Guaranty is binding on the
Guarantor, and its successors and assigns.


 


6.
This Guaranty is governed by the laws of the State of Delaware.


 


7.
This Guaranty may not be changed, modified, discharged or terminated except by a written agreement signed by Guarantor and Rev
Acquisition.


 


8.
Guarantor’s notice address is: 7621 Little Avenue, Suite 414, Charlotte, NC 28228.


 


[Remainder
of Page Intentionally Blank]


 



    	 



     


    




 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Guarantor is signing this Guaranty as of August 30, 2021.


 


	 	GUARANTOR:
	 	 	 
	 	PIE SQUARED PIZZA, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	 Jim
    Kepple    
	 	Its:	Authorized Signatory
#### GARZA v. STATE.

No. 25838.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 4, 1952.

Alaniz & Norris, Alice, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for murder without malice; the punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

This prosecution arose in Duval County. The venue for trial was transferred to Jim Wells County.

The record affirmatively reflects that the case was tried by and before a special judge because the regular judge was disqualified.

The special judge subscribed to the so-called old oath of office — that is, the oath of office prescribed by the Constitution of this State prior to the adoption of the amendment to Art. 16, Sec. 1, of the Constitution of this State in 1938, Vernon’s Ann.St. The special judge did not subscribe the oath presently prescribed by our Constitution.

It is insisted that the trial, as well as the acts done and performed by the special judge, was null and void because of his failure to subscribe the oath of office prescribed by our Constitution.

The case of Enloe v. State, 141 Tex.Cr.R. 602, 150 S.W.2d 1039, is directly in point, and sustains appellant’s contention. We had occasion to there point out the difference between the so-called old and new oath of office. It would serve no useful purpose to here re-state the oaths. The Enloe case has been followed in Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 238 S.W.2d 787.

It follows that the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct Of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. § 1350)**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of SouthWest Water Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”),I, David Stanton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that:

 

1)             to myknowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)             theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  November 9, 2009 | /s/ DAVID  STANTON       |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                          | David  Stanton           |
|                          | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 31.2

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S.
Bank Trust National Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, News America Debenture-Backed Series 2002-9 Trust (the Trust), certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed by
Lehman ABS Corporation in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report of the Trust;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or
similar agreement for inclusion in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my knowledge, except as
disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2011



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ David J. Kolibachuk            
|David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
EXHIBIT 15.5



|     |  |                                                                                           |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                       
|---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Registered Office: 51 Reserve Road Pickering Brook Western Australia 6076 ACN 120 266 999 |  |  |  | Telephone:    +61 (0)8 9293 7449 Facsimile:     +61 (0)8 9293
7459 E-Mail:    info@piranmining.com.au Website:  www.piranmining.com.au

The Board of Directors of

Randgold Resources Limited (the Company)

March 28, 2013



|Re: | Consent
|--- | -------

Gentlemen:

I, Timothy Peters, do hereby consent to the reference of myself in the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2012 (the Annual Report) to which this consent is an exhibit, to any reference to Mr. Tim Peters under the heading Experts in any registration statement into which the Annual Report is
incorporated by reference, and to the citation and/or summarization of the reserve statement in the Annual Report as calculated by me for the Kibali underground mineral reserves.

Dated this 28thday of March, 2013.



|       |  |               
|------ |  | --------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Tim Peters
|Name:  |  | Tim Peters    
|Title: |  | Consultant
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 117 
          - [CGD11-00-011] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of temporary deviation from regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

The Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District has approved a temporary deviation to the regulations governing the opening of the Isleton bascule drawbridge at mile 18.7 over the Sacramento River, Solano County, CA. The approval specifies that the bridge need not open for vessel traffic from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. on 23 October 2000. This deviation is to allow California Department of Transportation to perform essential maintenance on the bridge. 

# DATES:

Effective period of the deviation is from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. on 23 October 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David H. Sulouff, Chief, Bridge Section; Eleventh Coast Guard District, Bldg 50-6 Coast Guard Island, Alameda, CA 94501-5100, telephone (510) 437-3516. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Isleton Drawbridge, mile 18.7, over the Sacramento River, Solano County, CA, provides 18 feet vertical clearance above Mean Lower Low Water when closed. Vessels that can pass under the bridge without an opening may do so at all times. This deviation has been coordinated with commercial operators and various marinas on the waterway. No objections were received. The normal drawbridge regulation requires the bridge to open on signal from May 1 through October 31 from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., and from November 1 through April 30 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. At all other times, the draws shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given.

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as soon as possible. This deviation from the normal operating regulations in 33 CFR 117.5 is authorized in accordance with the provisions of 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: September 29, 2000. 

C.D. Wurster, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District.

[FR Doc. 00-26076 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 92 DB 2020 (No. 56 RST 2020)

:

JOSEPH VERN ERWIN : Attorney Registration No. 79395

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM INACTIVE STATUS : ( Out Of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26 th day of August

, 2020 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated August 1 8

, 2020

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Joseph Vern Erwin

, who has been on Inactive Status

, h as demonstrated that he has the

moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in

the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of

the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner

.
*** E.O. 12866 Review – Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review ***

Updated NHTSA and EPA Responses to Interagency Line 

Item Comments on HDV Phase 2 NPRM Preamble Received 

on June 5, 2015

NHTSA and EPA Response: The agencies believe we have substantively concurred with these 

interagency recommended edits, with only minor editorial revisions for clarity.

Edits the Agencies Have Confirmed are Present in the Current Preamble File:

Page 46: Deletion in the first bullet.

Agencies have confirmed this deletion in the Preamble.

Page 48: Add a request for comment.

Agencies have confirmed that the Preamble now reads: “As discussed throughout this document, 

the agencies believe Alternative 4 has potential to be the maximum feasible alternative, however, 

based on the evidence currently before us, the agencies have outstanding questions regarding 

relative risks and benefits of that option in the timeframe envisioned. We are seeking comment 

on these relative risks and benefits.”

Page 219: EO12866 suggested edits.

Agencies have confirmed that the Preamble now reads: “The agencies also regard these 

reductions as cost-effective, even without considering payback period. The agencies estimate the 

cost per metric ton of CO2eq reduction without considering fuel savings to be $20 in 2030, and 

we estimate the cost per gallon of avoided fuel consumption to be about $0.25 per gallon, which 

compares favorably with the levels of cost effectiveness the agencies found to be reasonable for 

light duty trucks.

Footnote: “If using a cost effectiveness metric that treats fuel savings as a negative cost, net costs 

per ton of GHG emissions reduced or per gallon of avoided fuel consumption would be negative 

under the proposed standards.”

Page 848: Technical edits to regulation.

Agencies have confirmed that the Regulation text in §1068.301 now reads: “(d) Complete the 

appropriate EPA declaration form before importing any engines or equipment. These forms may

be submitted and stored electronically and are available on the Internet at 

http://www.epa.gov/OTAQ/imports/ or by phone at 734-214-4100. Importers must keep the 

forms these records for five years and make them available promptly upon request.”
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 18-1513 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v. SIDNEY P. KILMARTIN, Defendant, Appellant.

**ERRATA SHEET** The opinion of this Court issued on December 6, 2019 is amended as follows: On page 16, line 1: replace "foregone" with "forgone"
ALD
- 173 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11

- 1032

___________ CONSPIRATORS

v. DR. CHANDAN S. VORA ,

A ppellant

____________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No. 09

- 00275 ) District Judge: Honorable Gustave Diamond

____________________________________ Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B ) or Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 April 28, 2011 Before: SCIRICA, HARDIMAN AND VANASKIE , Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : May 18, 2011 )

_____ ____ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM
Dr. Chandan S. Vora appeals from the order s of the United States District Court
for the Western District of Pennsylvania denying her motion to file a motion for re

hearing of the court’s prior order dismissing her peti tion for removal

.2

Dr. Vora filed a petition for removal, which the District Court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and as otherwise frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). This Court dismissed Dr. Vora’s appeal under § 1915(e)(2)(B)

. Conspirators v. Vora , C.A. No. 09

- 4608 (3d Cir. Mar. 4, 2010). O n November 22, 2010, Dr. Vora filed a motion for an
extension of time to file a motion f or re
- hearing of the District Court’s dismissal of her removal petition, which the District Court denied as moot in li ght of our judgment dismissing Dr. Vora’s related appeal, and pursuant to a pre
- filing injunction issued in
2008. See In re Chandan S. Vora , Misc . No. 08

- mc
- 00104 (W.D. Pa . Oct. 2 1 , 2008) (prohibiting Dr. Vora from filing “ any motions and pleadings and ot her documents in cases that have been dismissed and closed by the district court and that subsequently have
been appealed” to this Court )

. Dr. Vora filed this timely appeal

. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Upon de

novo review of the record and careful consideration of Dr. Vora’s notice of appeal and other submissions, we conclude that there is no substantial question presented on appeal and that summary action is warranted. See LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. We need not
de cide whether the pre

- filing injunction comports with Abdul

- Akbar v. Watson , 9 01 F.2d 329, 333 (3d Cir. 1990). Assuming without deciding that the pre

- filing injunction does not apply here, the District Court properly denied Dr. Vo ra’s motion for an extensi on of
time as moot based on our dismissal of her appeal of the same court order upon which
she ultimately sought a rehearing. Accordingly, we will summarily affirm the District Court judgment.
WACHOVIA        8739 Research Drive
	Charlotte, NC 28288
SECURITIES	
 

 
**OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

	Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement      dated as of June 11, 2002, by and among Structured Asset Securities Corporation, as Depositor, Wachovia Bank National Association, as Master Servicer, Lend Lease Asset Management L.P., as Special Servicer, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as   Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2002   C2 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have   the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

	Pursuant to Section 3.13 of this Agreement, Timothy E. Steward and Clyde M. Alexander, Directors of the Master Servicer, do hereby certify that:
-   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from July       9, 2002 through December 31, 2002 and of its performance under the   Agreement during such period has been made under our supervision; and
To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under this Agreement in all material   respects throughout the period July 9, 2002 through December 31, 2002; and
The Master Servicer has received no notice regarding qualification, or    challenging the status, of any REMIC Pool as a REMIC or the Grantor Trust         as a grantor trust, from the Internal revenue Service or any other          governmental agency or body.

             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of                        the _______ day of March, 2003.

 

*Timothy E. Steward  			***Clyde M. Alexander
Timothy E. Steward, Director 			Clyde M. Alexander, Director

Wachovia Bank National Association		Wachovia Bank National Association	

(Formerly known as First Union		(Formerly known as First Union

   National Bank)				   National Bank)

 

 

 

Wachovia Services is the trade name under which Wachovia Corporation conducts its investment banking, capital markets and institutional securities business 

Through First Union Securities, Inc. ("FUSI"), member NYSE, NASD, SIPC and through other bank and non bank and broker dealer subsidiaries of Wachovia Corporation,

Including Wachovia Bank, N.A. and First Union National Bank.******
**EXHIBIT
      31.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      David
      Lamadrid, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of MedaSorb Technologies
      Corporation; and





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




Date: April
              30,2007
            By:
            /s/ David
              LamadridDavid
              Lamadrid,Chief
              Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00454-ADA

ORDER CANCELLING TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case having been set

for TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE on Friday, September 18, 2020 at

03:00 PM is hereby CANCELLED until further order of the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2020.

______________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 26 Filed 09/17/20 Page 1 of 1