Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 27, 2000 / Notices 58045

On May 12, 1997, the CIT affirmed the

final revised remand determinations in

Thyssen Stahl AG v. United States Slip

Op. 97–55 (May 12, 1997). That decision

was appealed. On July 27, 1998, the

CAFC affirmed the decision of the CIT

in Thyssen Stahl AG v. United States,

Slip Op. 97–1509 (July 27, 1998).

In light of the final and conclusive

court decision in this action, we are

amending the ‘‘all others’’ cash deposit

rate from 19.03% to 21.66% ad valorem

for cold-rolled and from 4.18% to

10.02% ad valorem for corrosion

resistant carbon steel flat products from

Germany. We are not amending the cash

deposit rates for Thyssen because they

have been superseded by subsequent

administrative reviews for this

company.

Amended Final Determination

As there is now a final and conclusive

court decision in this action, we are

amending the amended final

determinations on certain cold-rolled

and corrosion resistant carbon steel flat

products from Germany, pursuant to

section 516A(e) of the Act. As a result

of these remand redeterminations, the

recalculated final weighted-average

margins are as follows:

Manufacturer/producer/exporter Margin

percentage

Cold-Rolled:

Klo ̈ckner Stahl GmbH ........... 23.54

Thyssen Stahl AG ................. 20.64

All Others .............................. 21.66

Corrosion Resistant:

Thyssen Stahl AG ................. 10.02

All Others .............................. 10.02

Cash Deposit Instructions

The ‘‘all others’’ cash deposit rates of

21.66% ad valorem for cold-rolled and

10.02% ad valorem for corrosion

resistant carbon steel flat products from

Germany will be effective upon

publication of this notice of amended

final determinations on all shipments of

the subject merchandise entered, or

withdrawn from warehouse, for

consumption on or after the publication

date.

These amended final determinations

and notice are in accordance with

sections 736(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C.

1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 353.20(a)(4)

(1994).

Dated: September 20, 2000.

Troy H. Cribb,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–24851 Filed 9–26–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–823–805]

Final Results of Full Sunset Review:

Silicomanganese From Ukraine

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of final results of full

sunset review: silicomanganese from

Ukraine.

SUMMARY: On May 30, 2000, the

Department of Commerce (‘‘the

Department’’) published a notice of

preliminary results of the full sunset

review of the suspended antidumping

investigation on silicomanganese from

Ukraine (65 FR 34440) pursuant to

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,

as amended (‘‘the Act’’). We provided

interested parties an opportunity to

comment on our preliminary results. We

did not receive comments from either

domestic or respondent interested

parties. As a result of this review, the

Department finds that termination of the

suspended antidumping investigation

would be likely to lead to continuation

or recurrence of dumping at levels

indicated in the Final Results of Review

section of this notice.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 27, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Martha V. Douthit, Office of Policy for

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5050

or (202) 482–3330, respectively.

Statute and Regulations

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the Act are references to the

provisions effective January 1, 1995, the

effective date of the amendments made

to the Act by the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act (‘‘URAA’’). In addition,

unless otherwise indicated, all citations

to the Department regulations are to 19

CFR Part 351 (1999). Guidance on

methodological or analytical issues

relevant to the Department’s conduct of

sunset reviews is set forth in the

Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3—

Policies Regarding the Conduct of Fiveyear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty

Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871

(April 16, 1998) (‘‘Sunset Policy

Bulletin’’).

Background

On May 30, 2000, the Department of

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)

published in the Federal Register a

notice of preliminary results of the full

sunset review of the suspended

antidumping investigation on

silicomanganese from Ukraine, pursuant

to section 751(c) of the Act. In our

preliminary results, we found that

termination of the suspended

antidumping investigation would be

likely to lead to continuation or

recurrence of dumping, and we

preliminarily determined the following

dumping margin likely to prevail if the

suspended antidumping investigation

were terminated:

Manufacturers/Exporters Margin

(percent)

Country-wide ............................... 163.00

We did not receive a case brief on

behalf of either domestic or respondent

interested parties within the deadline

specified in 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(i).

Scope of Review

The merchandise covered by this

sunset review is silicomanganese.

Silicomanganese, which is sometimes

called ferrosilicon manganese, is a

ferroalloy composed principally of

manganese, silicon, and iron, and

normally containing much smaller

proportions of minor elements, such as

carbon, phosphorous, and sulfur.

Silicomanganese generally contains by

weight not less than four percent iron,

more than 30 percent manganese, more

than eight percent silicon, and not more

than three percent phosphorous. All

compositions, forms, and sizes of

silicomanganese are included within the

scope of this review, including

silicomanganese slag, fines, and

briquettes. Silicomanganese is used

primarily in steel production as a source

of both silicon and manganese. This

sunset review covers all

silicomanganese, regardless of its tariff

classification. Most silicomanganese is

currently classifiable under subheading

7202.30.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff

Schedule of the United States

(‘‘HTSUS’’). Some silicomanganese may

also currently be classifiable under

HTSUS subheading 7202.99.5040.

Although the HTSUS subheadings are

provided for convenience and customs

purposes, our written description of the

subject merchandise remains

dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

The Department did not receive case

briefs from either domestic or

respondent interested parties. Therefore,

we have not made any changes to our

58046 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 27, 2000 / Notices

preliminary results of May 30, 2000 (65

FR 34440).

Final Results of Review

As a result of this review, the

Department finds that termination of the

suspended antidumping investigation

on silicomanganese from Ukraine would

be likely to lead to continuation or

recurrence of dumping at the level listed

below:

Manufacturers/Exporters Margin

(percent)

Country-wide ............................... 163.00

This notice also serves as the only

reminder to parties subject to

administrative protective orders

(‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility

concerning the return or disposition of

proprietary information disclosed under

APO in accordance with 19 CFR

351.305 of the Department’s regulations.

Timely written notification of the return

or destruction of APO materials or

conversion to judicial protective order is

hereby requested. Failure to comply

with the regulations and terms of an

APO is a violation which is subject to

sanction.

This five-year (‘‘sunset’’) review and

notice are in accordance with sections

751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

Dated: September 21, 2000.

Troy H. Cribb,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–24848 Filed 9–26–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Applications for Duty-Free Entry of

Scientific Instruments

Pursuant to section 6(c) of the

Educational, Scientific and Cultural

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.

L. 89–651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part

301), we invite comments on the

question of whether instruments of

equivalent scientific value, for the

purposes for which the instruments

shown below are intended to be used,

are being manufactured in the United

States.

Comments must comply with 15 CFR

301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and

be filed within 20 days with the

Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S.

Department of Commerce, Washington,

DC 20230. Applications may be

examined between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00

P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.

Docket Number: 00–021. Applicant:

University of Florida, Materials Science

and Engineering, Post Office Box

116400, Gainesville, FL 32611–6400.

Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model

JEM–2010F. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd.,

Japan. Intended Use: The instrument is

intended to be used to study the

microstructure of metals, metal alloys,

ceramics, high-temperature

superconductors, semiconductors,

polymers, clays, dental implants and

soot emissions while conducting the

following representative experiments:

1. Structure-property relationships in

semiconducting materials.

2. Interface phenomena in oxides.

3. Analysis of interfaces in advanced

polymers and photonic devices.

4. The structure of high-temperature

materials.

5. Mechanical properties of dental

implants.

6. Polymer-protein and polymer-cell

interactions.

7. Nanoscale properties of porous

silicon.

8. Structure and chemistry of oxide

minerals.

9. Structure-property relationships in

opto-electronic materials.

10. Strength/hardness enhancement

in superlattices.

In addition, the instrument will be

used on a one-to-one basis for training

of faculty, staff and graduate students.

Application accepted by Commissioner

of Customs: June 9, 2000.

Docket Number: 00–027. Applicant:

Emory University, Department of

Biology, 2006 Rollins Research Center,

1510 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322.

Instrument: Slice Physiology Setup.

Manufacturer: Luigs and Neumann,

Germany. Intended Use: The instrument

is intended to be used to do

electrophysiological studies using rat

brain slices. The experiments consist of

preparing slices of rat brain, putting

them under the microscope and

inserting microeletrodes into single

nerve cells. Once the microelectrode is

inserted, a fluorescent dye will be

injected into the cell body to visualize

fine dendritic processes. The

microscope will then be moved to focus

on one of the visualized fine processes,

and a second electrode can be inserted

into the same cell. The main objective

of this research is to understand

neuronal activity and information

processing in the mammalian brain. In

particular, nerve cells in brain

structures involved in a motor control

will be studied. In addition, the

instrument will be used for educational

purposes in the course Bio. 498 Guided

Research for Senior Undergraduate

Students. Application accepted by

Commissioner of Customs: September 5,

2000.

Docket Number: 00–028. Applicant:

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley

National Laboratory, One Cyclotron

Road, Berkeley, CA 94720. Instrument:

Electron Microscope, Model JEM–3010.

Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.

Intended Use: The instrument is

intended to be used for studies of the

microstructure and microstructural

evolution of metals, metal alloys,

ceramics, electronic and opto-electronic

materials and nanocomposites. The

experiments will include:

1. In-situ microscopy—real time

evolutions of structure/property/

processing relationships.

2. Real time high-resolution electron

microscopy.

3. Dislocation and defect studies in

materials.

4. Identification of phases and crystal

structure by electron diffraction and

convergent beam electron diffraction.

In addition, the instrument will be

used for significant one-to-one

educational use between the staff and

users on how to exploit transmission

electron microscopy to solve materials

problems. Application accepted by

Commissioner of Customs: September 5,

2000.

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 00–24850 Filed 9–26–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

[I.D. 092100D]

Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management

Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery

Management Council (MAFMC) and its

Comprehensive Management

Committee, Executive Committee, Law

Enforcement Committee, Demersal

Committee, Squid-Mackerel-Butterfish

Committee, and Habitat Committee will

hold a public meeting.

DATES: The meetings will be held on

Tuesday, October 10, 2000, to Thursday,

October 12, 2000.