alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5461 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5461

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Tetraconazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Price of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Tetraconazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TETRACONAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.15 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Tetraconazole) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 11**

**STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS**

Basic earnings per common share of $0.66 for the year endedDecember 31, 2008 were calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders of $3.3 million for the period January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding of 4,915,350.

Diluted earnings per common share of $0.66 for the year ended December 31, 2008 were calculated by dividing net income available to commonshareholders of $3.3 million for the period January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 by the weighted-average number of diluted potential common shares outstanding of 4,916,876.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, and VMWARE, INC.

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00475-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

LETTERS OF REQUEST FOR FOREIGN DISCOVERY FROM CANADA
1

Defendants’, Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., EMC Corporation, and VMware, Inc.,

(collectively “Defendants”), seek foreign discovery from third party witnesses residing in Quebec, 

Canada. Defendants have attached an Appendix with a Letter of Request which includes

Document Requests and Deposition Topics. The chart below outlines the names of the witness 

Defendants seek foreign discovery from, the relevant case number, and the Patent at issue. 

Appx. Name of Witness 

Entity

Relevance of 

Witness/Entity Case No. U.S. Pat. No.

A Georges Jabbour

Named Inventor of a 

Related Application of 

the Patent

6:20-cv-00475 7,453,888

Defendants respectfully request that the Court execute the Letter of Request attached as 

Appendix A. Defendants further request that, after the Court has signed the Letter of Request, 

the Clerk of this Court authenticate the Court’s signature under the seal of this Court, and return 

the original signed and sealed executed Letter, and two certified copies of the signed and sealed 

executed Letter, to Defendants’ counsel, Barry K. Shelton, for delivery to the proper authority.

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, indicated 

that it reserves the right to serve its own foreign discovery in the future.
2 

Dated: November 6, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029 

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com 

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205 

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165 

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Benjamin Hershkowitz 

bhershkowitz@gibsondunn.com 

Brian A. Rosenthal

brosenthal@gibsondunn.com 

Allen Kathir

akathir@gibsondunn.com 

Kyanna Sabanoglu 

ksabanoglu@gibsondunn.com 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Ave. 

New York, NY 10166-0193 

Telephone: (212) 351-4000 

Facsimile: (212) 351-4035 

Y. Ernest Hsin

ehsin@gibsondunn.com

Jaysen S. Chung

jschung@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

555 Mission St., Ste. 3000

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921

Telephone: (415) 393-8200

Facsimile: (415) 393-8306

Ryan K. Iwahashi

riwahashi@gibsondunn.com 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

1881 Page Mill Rd. 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1211 

Telephone: (650) 849-5300 

Facsimile: (650) 849-5333 

Attorneys for Defendants
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 6, 2020, all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the 

Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

BRYCE RINKHOFF, INDIVIDUALLY AND

AS A MEMBER OF RINKHOFF AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, L.L.C.,

Petitioner

v.

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, GREENE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, PRESIDENT JUDGE, FARLEY TOOTHMAN,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 11 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of May

, 2018, the Application for Permission to Reply, to

the extent it seeks leave to respond to the no

- answer letter, is GRANTED. In all other

respects, the Application for Permission to Reply is DENIED. The Petition for Writ of

Prohibition is DENIED. The Applicati on for Intervention is DISMISSED. The Prothonotary

is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-117037 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements No. 333-128072, 333-124090, 333-117828, 333-112490 and 333-103671 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 30, 2005, relating to the consolidated financialstatements as of December 31, 2004 and for the two years then ended of Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co., and of our report dated March 30, 2005 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphrelating to economic and operational dependency on its parent) related to the financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and for the period inception (May 4, 2004) to December 31, 2004 of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust all appearingin this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co. for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

San Diego, California 

March 15, 2006
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

KENNETH BELL, et al., §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§

v. § 1:20-CV-461-RP

§

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC., et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Kenneth Bell’s (“Bell”) Notice of Dismissal, in which he 

dismisses his claims against Defendant Albertson’s Companies, Inc. (“Albertson’s”) without 

prejudice. (Dkt. 97). In his Notice, Bell cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), which

allows a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal 

before the opposing party serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. (Id. at 1). Though 

Rule 41 speaks of dismissing an “action,” the Fifth Circuit has interpreted it to allow plaintiffs to 

dismiss all of their claims against individual opposing parties. See Oswalt v. Scripto, Inc., 616 F.2d 191, 

194–95 (5th Cir. 1980); Plains Growers ex rel. Florists’ Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ickes-Braun Glasshouses, Inc., 474 

F.2d 250, 254–55 (5th Cir. 1973); see also 9 Charles A. Wright, et al. Federal Practice and Procedure § 2362 

(3d ed. Aug. 2019 update).

Albertson’s has not served an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Bell’s notice is 

therefore “self-effectuating” and “no order or other action of the district court is required.” In re 

Amerijet Int’l, Inc., 785 F.3d 967, 973 (5th Cir. 2015), as revised (May 15, 2015).

Case 1:20-cv-00461-RP Document 100 Filed 08/27/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall TERMINATE 

Albertson’s as a party in this case.

SIGNED on August 27, 2020.

_____________________________________

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00461-RP Document 100 Filed 08/27/20 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

STANDING ORDER REGARDING

FILING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN PATENT CASES AND REDACTED 

PLEADINGS

As a public forum, the Court has a policy of providing to the public full access to 

documents filed with the Court. Nevertheless, parties in patent cases routinely produce and rely 

on information that is confidential. Therefore, in all patent cases pending before the undersigned, 

the Court hereby grants leave for any party to file materials containing confidential information 

under seal without filing a separate motion seeking leave of the Court to do so. The filing party 

shall file a publicly available, redacted version of any motion or pleading filed under seal within 

seven days. The parties need not file redacted versions of exhibits to such documents. Exhibits 

that are nonconfidential in their entirety should not be filed under seal at all. The parties shall 

coordinate to make sure that the public version filing redacts information that any party deems 

confidential. Redactions should be targeted to redact only that information. The publicly 

available version shall be labeled “PUBLIC VERSION.” Cooperating to file the public version 

shall not be deemed as agreeing that the redacted information is actually confidential. 

This Order shall apply in all patent cases, but shall not require parties to file public 

versions of pleadings filed before the date of this Order. 

SIGNED this ___ day of February, 2021. 

_________________________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12th

FILED

DEPUTY 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BY: ________________________________ February 12, 2021 Reuben Amaro

Case 6:20-cv-00194-ADA Document 93 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Texas Offshore Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Louisiana (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Texas Offshore Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Louisiana (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 296    |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 May 2006

(2006/C 112/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
#### Harold Elsis et al., Respondents, v Trans World Airlines, Inc., et al., Appellants, and Go-Go and Liberty Travel, Inc., Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered on January 10, 1990, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Elliott Wilk, J., without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Carro, Asch and Ellerin, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5446 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5446

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on thiophanate methyl.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Mr. Meehan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on thiophanate methyl.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THIOPHANATE METHYL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.77 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to thiophanate methyl) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER § 

FOR CHOICE, et al., § 

§ 

Plaintiffs § 

§ 

V. § 

§ 

GREG ABBOTT, et al. § 

§ 

Defendants. § 

ORDER 

2020 MAY26 PM 12:31 

Civil Action No 1:20-cv-00323-LY 

Before the Court is Defendant Travis County District Attorney Margaret Moore's 

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiffs' Second Amended 

Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief. After careful consideration of the Motion, 

Plaintiffs' response, if any, and the pleadings filed by the parties, the Court is of the opinion that the 

Motion has merit and should be GRANTED. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Margaret Moore shall file a response to 

Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint on or before June 25, 2020. 

SIGNED this4..day of 2020. 

ED STAT DIST CT JUDGE 

Case 1:20-cv-00323-LY Document 111 Filed 05/26/20 Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00084

- CR

Gabriel MARTINEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR7552

Honorable Ron Rangel

, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED October 14, 2020.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5260 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5260

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Dilauroyl peroxide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Olson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Dilauroyl peroxide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DILAUROYL PEROXIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.82 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Dilauroyl peroxide) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### EASTHAM v. FARMER.

No. 11591.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Feb. 27, 1946.

Whitaker, Turpin, Kerr, Smith *&*Brooks, of Midland, for appellant.

Morriss & Morriss, of San Antonio, for appellee.

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a plea of privilege. Exception 12 of Article 1995, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats.,. which is here involved, ’ reads as follows,, to-wit:

“A suit for the foreclosure of a mortgage or other lien may be brought in the-county where the property or any part: thereof subject to such lien is situated.”

. When the nature of the suit is pertinent upon a venue inquiry, the issue is-determined by an inspection of the petition. Tennessee Gas & Transmission Co. v. Heard, Tex.Civ.App., 190 S.W.2d 518. The-claim asserted by the petition in this casé-is in the nature of , a suit for the foreclosure of a purchase money lien against land. It was stipulated that said land was located in. Real County, Texas, where this suit was filed.

 We hold that the trial court correctly overruled the plea of privilege. The: *569only venue facts under exception 12 of Article 1995 are that the action as made by the petition is in the nature of a suit Ifor the foreclosure of a mortgage or other lien; and that the property which the petition alleges is subject to the mortgage or lien is, in fact, situated in the county where the suit is brought. George v. Northwest Engineering Company, Tex.Civ.App., 156 S.W.2d 576.

The order appealed from is affirmed.
#### SPINKS v. STATE.

No. 25939.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 22, 1952.

Thomas L. Blanton, Albany, T. R. Odell, Lubbock, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, ten days in jail and a fine of $50.

The contested issue in the trial was whether the appellant or one Bunkey Bowman was the driver of the automobile at the time of the accident. Each of them testified that they were intoxicated, but each claimed that the other had been the driver.

Bill of exception No. 5 shows that, when cross-examining Bowman, appellant’s counsel asked him if immediately after the' accident he had not told one Lieb that he himself had been driving, to which Bowman replied that he didn’t say anything. Then Lieb was called as a witness and testified that at such time Bunkey had said that he was the driver.

Upon objection by the County Attorney, the court instructed the jury not to consider the question to Lieb or his answer.

In this, the court was clearly in error, as this evidence was admissible as impeachment of the witness Bowman.

Bill of exception No. 7 reflects manifest error in the argument of the County Attorney. In his closing argument, he told the jury, in part, as follows: “ * * * I would not have filed the charge against this man if I had not known that he was guilty.”

Such argument is never proper.

Time will not permit us to discuss the other questions raised.

For the errors shown, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                                 
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Nebraska Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023