alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certification under Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Thomas F. Bradley, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Enesco Group, Inc.(the “Registrant”). 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the Registrant andwe have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect , the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of the internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s Board of Directors:
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.                                                  /s/ Thomas F. Bradley   Interim Chief Executive Officer     
33
#### STEVENSON v. STATE.

No. 24899.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 25, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of felony theft, and the jury assessed his punishment at six years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record contains no notice of appeal to this court from the conviction, in the absence of which we are without jurisdiction to enter any order other than to dismiss the appeal. See Art. 827, C.C.P.; Patton *307v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 521, 203 S.W.2d 224; Vaughn v. State, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 240, 179 S.W.2d 980.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
n/09/201 1 15:19 FAX 2024935142 FAA - DMS 0002/00 2 

,Jhl^^,1ENT OF 

-j'^fA'SPORTATION 

NOV. 2, 2011 

NOV - o p J, 2 1 

My name is Srice Thompson. I am answering to a complaint of proposed civil penalty 

1. 1 was on southwest airlines flight 251 from Boston,mass to Reno,nv. 

3. My mother asked for tomatoe juice to attendent for vodka and he would't give it to her, he 

• - ~ laughed at" her. He said she should have asked for that in first 

place. She asked for bloody mary in first place. 

5. I did not strike anyone. I just told flight attendant to leave my mom alone. By the time my mom 

had the drink the attendants arm was in aisle with attendant aligned with the back of my mom's 

row. I was in seat in front by window. It is not possible for me to be in seat by window in front 

and hit attendant who is in aisle aligned with row behind me on the back side of row. My mom 

was last to get served in her row. So attendents arm is in aisle with attendant and he is moving 

to next row. Besides, if attendents arm was still serving my mom, he would have spilt drink. 
n/09/201 1 15:1 9 FAX 202493514 2 FAA - DMS @]001/00 2 

_ _ _ ^ - ~ - ^ •. 0004/00 6 

10/\3/20 n 13:00 FAI 3107256816 A.WP-7 ^^^ ^ 

V.S. DEPARTMEPfT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC ^ ^ 

In the Matter of Brie* E. Thompsoo: FAA DOCKET UNASSIGNED 

FAA CASE NO. 2onwpnooH 

Respondeat. 

JUDGE NOT ASSIGNED 

COMPLAINT 

The Complainanr files its Complami, pursuani to Rule 208 of the Rules of Practice 

(14 C.F.R. 13.208). and states as follows; 

I 

Respondent- Bri.ce E. Thompson, was advised through a Final Notice of Priiposed 

Civil Penalty (Final Notice), dated September 23, 2011, that the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) proposed to assess a civil penalty in the amount of 55,000.00. 

On October 3,201], Respondent submitted a wrinen request for a hearingIF. 

1. On or about January 4, 2011, Respondent was a passenger on board 

Southwest Airlines flighi 251 from Salt Lake City. Utah, TO Reno, Nevada. 

2. On the above occasion, Southwest AiiUncs flight 251 was operaiing under 

part 121 of the Federal Aviatroji Regulations. 

3. During the flight referenced in paragraph I, a flight attendant served an 

alcoholic beverage To a passenger sitting one TO"^ behind Respondcitt. 

4. The passenger referenced in paragraph 3 complained to the flight atLcndant 

about her alcoholic beverage. 

5. Respondent then Turned around in Respondent's scat /ind struck the fiiglit 

attendant's arm.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40102

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ABRAHAM ORTEGA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-1587-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Abraham Ortega raises 

arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 

204-05 (5th Cir. 2015), petition for cert. filed (June 19, 2015) (No. 14-10355), in 

which this court held that an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) 

for a prior felony conviction that is a drug trafficking offense is warranted 

regardless whether the prior conviction required proof of remuneration or 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40102 Document: 00513242575 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
No. 15-40102

2

commercial activity, and United States v. Rodriguez-Escareno, 700 F.3d 751, 

753-54 (5th Cir. 2012), in which this court held that a federal conviction for 

conspiracy to commit a drug trafficking offense qualifies for the 

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) enhancement. Accordingly, the motion for summary

disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-40102 Document: 00513242575 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-4172

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TAVON MCPHAUL, a/k/a Block,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District 

Judge. (1:12-cr-00616-MJG-3)

Submitted: November 7, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Beth M. Farber, HARRIS O’BRIEN, New York, New York, for 

Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Benjamin 

M. Block, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, 

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tavon McPhaul seeks to appeal his conviction and 

sentence. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal as 

untimely. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice 

of appeal within fourteen days after the entry of judgment. 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a 

showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court 

may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of 

appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 

F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

The district court entered judgment on January 13, 

2014. McPhaul filed the notice of appeal on February 26, 2014,

after the fourteen-day period expired but within the thirty-day 

excusable neglect period. Because the notice of appeal was 

filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to 

the district court for the court to determine whether McPhaul

has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an 

extension of the fourteen-day appeal period. The record, as 

supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further 

consideration. We defer action on the Government’s motion to 

dismiss the appeal.

REMANDED
This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in

the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12

- 405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer

generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Filing Date: March 21, 2022

N o . S

- 1

- SC

- 37745

ENOUGH , An Unincorporated Student Advocacy Group,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. RAY JARAMILLO, in his capacity as a member of the Las Cruces Public School District Board of Education,

Defendant

- Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY James T. Martin, District Judge
Walsh Gallegos Treviño Kyle & Robinson P.C. Elena Martinez Gallegos Albuquerque, NM
InAccord, P.C. Daniel A. Ivey

- Soto Daniel M. Hill Albuquerque, NM
for Appellant
Kemp Smith LLP CaraLyn Banks Las Cruces, NM
for Appellee

DISPOSITION AL ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL{1} WHEREAS this matter came on for consideration by the Court under Rule 12

-

603 NMRA, and the Court having considered the record proper and the pleadings filed with the Court; Chief Justice Michael E. Vigil, Justice C. Shannon Bacon , Justice David K. Thomson, Justice Julie J. Vargas, and Justice Briana H. Zamora concurring;
{2} NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the issues presented by this appeal are moot, the district court’s order finding probable cause to begin recall proceedings pur suant to the recall act filed on June 11, 2019 is also moot, and Defendant

Appellant’s appeal is hereby dismissed.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Justice

C. SHANNON BACON, Justice

DAVID K. THOMSON, Justice

JULIE J. VARGAS, Justice

BRIANA H. ZAMO RA, Justice
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 23, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 23, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0031. ANITA-RAE PANKEY JOYNER AS TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF CAESAR-TITUS ALLEN PANKEY v. NAVICENT HEALTH 

BALDWIN, INC et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

20SCCV091781
##### 



Exhibit 31(b)

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, James R. Young, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Union Pacific
Railroad Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2003/s/ James R. YoungJames R. Young
Chief Financial Officer
Union Pacific Railroad Company
#### Elbie BEAN, Appellant, v. R. V. DARNELL, Appellee. Guy BEAN, Appellant, v. R. V. DARNELL, Appellee. Tom WILKERSON, Appellant, v. R. V. DARNELL, Appellee. William Dean GARRIGUS, Appellant, v. R. V. DARNELL, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 10, 1954.

Nat Ryan Hughes, Murray, for appellants.

George Ed Overbey, Murray, Waller, Threlkeld & Whitlow, Paducah, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal in each of the above captioned actions from judgments entered in favor of the appellee in the Call-oway Circuit Court. These suits were instituted by the appellants to recover damages as a result of a collision involving two automobiles and a truck. The facts, ques*573tions raised, authorities cited, and applicable law have been carefully considered by the court, and we find no prejudicial error.

The motions for an appeal are overruled, and the judgments are affirmed.
#### Mario Alcalde, Appellant, *v.*Robert Butler, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

October 31, 1957.

*270
      *Jules Ornstein*for appellant.

*Charles B. Lewis*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Since the court below found the summons was not served upon defendant, it was compelled to vacate and set aside the judgment, pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 129 of the Municipal Court Code. Subdivision 2 of this section refers to the opening of a judgment taken by default after proper service of a summons.

The orders should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

Hoestadter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Orders affirmed, etc.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

###### **Certification ofChief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. § 1350)**

 

In connectionwith the quarterly report of Southwest Water Company (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Anton C. Garnier,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that:

 

1)              to my knowledge, the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 10, 2006 | /s/ ANTON C. GARNIER    |   |
|--------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|               | Anton C. Garnier        |
|               | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, James J. Fiedler, CFO of Larrea
Biosciences Corporation, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following certification as
required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the
following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934: Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2006.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in
all respects, the financial condition of Larrea Biosciences Corporation and results of its
operations.

Date: October 26, 2006/s/ James J. FiedlerCFO
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 30

 32

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
|                                                                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                                                       
|California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                                                       
|California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 3     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                       AGREEMENT DATED AS OF JUNE 26, 2002


                    BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-F


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. (the
"Servicer"), the Servicer in connection with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2002-F, do hereby certify that (i) a review of the activities of the
Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of its performance under this
Agreement (the "Agreement") has been made under my supervision, (ii) to the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled in all
material aspects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                       BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                       By:
                                          ------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President


Inv D41
#### In the Matter of Jack Henderson et al., Petitioners, and Noell Carr, Appellant, v David Klasfeld, as Chairman of the New York City Loft Board, et al., Respondents.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.), entered on April 24, 1990, unanimously affirmed, for the reasons stated by Stanley Sklar, J., without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Milonas, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.