alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### LEFTWICH v. STATE.

No. 23728.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1947.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 22, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*611HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for driving an automobile on a public highway while intoxicated.

There are no bills of exception in the record. A jury was waived and the trial was before the court. Two officers testified to the manner in which appellant was operating his car; that they smelled liquor on his breath, and that he was intoxicated. Appellant and his witnesses testified that he was not intoxicated. A question of fact thus arose, and the finding of the trial court was against appellant. This court is without authority to disturb the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Oh Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

We have re-examined the record in this case in the light of the motion for rehearing and are of the opinion that the correct order was made on original submission.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
#### CONINE v. STATE.

No. 25673.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 13, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from -a conviction of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated, the penalty being assessed at a fine of $150.

The record brought forward contains no statement of facts or bill of exception. All proceedings appear regular and nothing is presented for review by this court.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, AND VMWARE, INC.

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00480-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

LETTER OF REQUEST FOR FOREIGN DISCOVERY
1

Defendants Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., EMC Corporation, and VMware, Inc.

(collectively “Defendants”) seek foreign discovery from third party witnesses residing in France.

Defendants have attached an Appendix with a Letter of Request which includes Document 

Requests and Deposition Topics. Defendants respectfully request that the Court execute the Letter 

of Request attached as Appendix G. Defendants further request that, after the Court has signed the 

Letter of Request, the Clerk of this Court authenticate the Court’s signature under the seal of this 

Court, and return the original signed and sealed executed Letter, and two certified copies of the 

signed and sealed executed Letters, to Defendants’ counsel, Barry K. Shelton, for delivery to the 

proper authority.

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, indicated 

that it reserves the right to serve its own foreign discovery in the future.

Dated: November 6, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Attorneys for Defendants
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 6, 2020, all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the 

Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Standard Register Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 2, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis L. Rediker, President and Chief Executive Officer, and I, Craig J. Brown, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 3, 2006   /S/DENNIS L. REDIKER Dennis L. Rediker President and Chief Executive Officer   /S/ CRAIG J. BROWN Craig J. Brown Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

AND EMC CORPORATION, 

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00473-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STRIKE DUPLICATE LETTER OF REQUEST FOR

FOREIGN DISCOVERY

Defendants Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., and EMC Corporation, (collectively 

“Defendants”) filed a Motion for Letter of Request (Dkt. 44) for foreign discovery on November 

6, 2020, which was a duplicate of Motion for Letter of Request (Dkt. 43). Defendants respectfully 

request that the Court strike the Motion for Letter of Request (Dkt. 44).

Dated: November 10, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 45 Filed 11/10/20 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 10, 2020, all counsel of record who are 

deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document 

through the Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 45 Filed 11/10/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5532 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5532

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain woven fabrics of synthetic 
                             filament yarn.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

Mr. Young of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain woven fabrics of synthetic 
                             filament yarn.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF SYNTHETIC FILAMENT YARN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Woven fabrics of    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          synthetic                                                         12/31/2015
                          filament yarn,
                          including woven
                          fabrics obtained
                          from materials of
                          heading 5404:
                          Other woven
                          fabrics: Dyed:
                          Other (provided
                          for in subheading
                          5407.92.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 2/28/96 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

___________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ) v. ) No. 95-5180 ) CHARLES SAMUEL LANGHAM, ) ) Defendant-Appellant. )

___________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (D.C. No. 90-CR-103-C)

_____________________________________ James L. Swartz, Assistant United States Attorney, Tulsa, Oklahoma for Plaintiff-Appellee. Charles Langham, pro se.

_____________________________________ Before ANDERSON, TACHA, and KELLY.

_____________________________________ After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. **See** Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

The defendant was convicted of various drug offenses following a guilty plea in July 1991. The conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal in April 1993. On March 23, 1995, the defendant filed a motion for the transcripts of his sentencing hearing at government expense, contending that he needed the transcripts to prepare a post-conviction motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. That motion was denied on July 31 and the notice of appeal was filed on August 21. The defendant has not filed any collateral proceedings challenging this conviction.
We lack jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was untimely. **See** Fed. R. App. P. 4(b); United States v. Lanier , 604 F.2d 1157, 1159-60 (8th Cir. 1979).
A timely notice of appeal is both mandatory and jurisdictional. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978).
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James L. Rouse, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of murder in the second degree and attempted murder in the second degree, defendant argues that his appearance before the jury in leg shackles constitutes reversible error. We find that the court properly exercised its discretion in ordering the removal of defendant’s handcuffs while ordering that the leg shackles remain, in light of defendant’s two attempts to escape from the county jail and the fact there were five exits in the courtroom and insufficient security to guard each exit *(see, People v Mendola,*2 NY2d 270, 275; *People v Lundquist,*151 AD2d 505, *lv denied*74 NY2d 849; *People v Tedesco,*143 AD2d 155, 159, *lv denied*73 NY2d 860). The court erred in permitting Dr. Ewing to testify, over objection, to defendant’s ability to form the intent to commit the crimes charged *(see, People v Cronin,*60 NY2d 430, 433). However, because his testimony related to intent in relation to intoxication and defendant’s principal claim was that he was suffering from a mental disease or defect, the error was harmless *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242). We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find that none requires reversal. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J.—murder, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5301 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain single yarns of 

viscose rayon. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain single 

yarns of viscose rayon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SINGLE YARNS OF VISCOSE RAYON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.54.03 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain single yarns of viscose rayon) is amended by strik7 ing the date in the effective period column and inserting 

8 ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5301 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5470 

To suspend temporarily the duty on polycrystalline alumina tubes and shaped 

bodies designed for high intensity discharge (HID) lamps. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on polycrystalline alumina 

tubes and shaped bodies designed for high intensity discharge (HID) lamps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLYCRYSTALLINE ALUMINA TUBES AND 

4 SHAPED BODIES DESIGNED FOR HIGH INTEN5 SITY DISCHARGE (HID) LAMPS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5470 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Polycrystalline alumina 

tubes and shaped bodies 

designed for high intensity 

discharge (HID) lamps 

(provided for in subheading 8539.90.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### MOORING v. STATE.

No. 26205.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 11, 1953.

J. Q. Smith, Quanah, R. R. Donaghey, Vernon, for appellant.

Jim.W. Sowell, County Atty., Quahan, George. P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the sale of whiskey in a dry area, with prior offenses alleged to enhance the punishment; the punishment, a fine of $400.

The sole question presented for review grows out of the allegation and proof of the prior offenses in the instant case. Appellant contends that, since the same prior offenses were alleged and proven to enhance the punishment in another case against the appellant, they may not be used for the same purpose in the instant case, even though the prior case resulted in an acquittal of the appellant. Reliance is had upon the holding of this court in Kinney v. State, 45 Tex.Cr.R. 500, 79 S.W. 570.

Recently, in Johnson v. State, 253 S.W.2d 1006, we had occasion to review the holdings of this court in the Gooden cases, Gooden v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 347, 145 S.W.2d 177, Id., 140. Tex.Cr.R. 351, 145 S.W.2d 179, and in Sigler v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 200, 157 S.W.2d 903, which-cases presented more complicated variations of the same question.

We hold that, where the prior, convictions were alleged and .proven to enhance the punishment in a case which results in an acquittal, this does not constitute a successful use of the prior convictions so as to prevent their being used in a subsequent case for the same purpose.

• If the Kinney case be construed as holding in conflict with the decision here reached, it is expressly overruled to that extent.

We hold the doctrine of jeopardy does not apply to the case at bar.

The judgment of. the trial, court is affirmed.
Exhibit 10.3


 


Alpine
Acquisition Corporation


10141
N. Canyon View Lane


Fountain
Hills, Arizona 85268


 


August
30, 2021


 


Alpine
Acquisition Sponsor LLC


10141
N. Canyon View Lane


Fountain
Hills, Arizona 85268


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration
statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of securities of Alpine Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the
consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in
the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Alpine Acquisition
Sponsor LLC shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may be required by the
Company from time to time, situated at 10141 N. Canyon View Lane, Fountain Hills, Arizona 85268 (or any successor location) for $10,000
per month. Alpine Acquisition Sponsor LLC hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to
any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) to be established upon the consummation
of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out
of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 




     


     


    

 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 	 
	 	ALPINE ACQUISITION CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Kim Schaefer
	 	 	Name:  	Kim
    Schaefer
	 	 	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer


 


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 
	ALPINE ACQUISITION SPONSOR LLC	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Elan Blutinger 	 
	 	Name:  	Elan
    Blutinger	 
	 	Title:	Managing
    Member	 


 


 


[Signature
Page to Administrative Services Agreement]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Standard Motor Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James J. Burke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/S/ JAMES J. BURKE
------------------------------
James J. Burke
Chief Financial Officer
November 6, 2008


* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Standard Motor Products, Inc. and will be retained by Standard Motor
Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-920-1310-01; WYW111766]

      ( print page 60207)    
Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW111766 for lands in Converse County, Wyoming, was timely filed and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date of termination.

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively.                

                    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW111766 effective January 1, 2000, subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                

Mavis Love,

Acting Chief, Leasable Minerals Section.

[FR Doc. 00-25912  Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5501 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on mixtures of 1-(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8- 

octahydro-2,3,8,8-tetramethyl -2-naphthalenyl)-ethan-1-one (and isomers). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. SCHMIDT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on mixtures of 

1-(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-octahydro-2,3,8,8-tetramethyl -2- 

naphthalenyl)-ethan-1-one (and isomers). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF 1-(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-OCTAHYDRO4 2,3,8,8-TETRAMETHYL-2-NAPHTHALENYL)- 

5 ETHAN-1-ONE (AND ISOMERS). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5501 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures of 1- 

(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-octahydro2,3,8,8-tetramethyl-2- 

naphthalenyl)-ethan-1-one 

(and isomers)(CAS Nos. 

54464–57–2; 68155–66–8; 

68155–67–9) (provided for 

in subheading 2914.29.50) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS