alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 31257

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , P laintiff

− Appell ee,

versus THADDEUS RICHARDSON , Defendant

− Appell ant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana No. 2:14

- CV

- 1375

Before SMITH, WIENER, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Thaddeus Richardson, federal prisoner #32639

- 034, was convicted of

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 9, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-31257 Document: 00514188171 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/09/2017No. 16

- 31257

2 possession with intent to distribute a mixture or substance containing a detect

able amount of heroin and possession of firearms in furtherance of a drug traf

ficking crime. He seeks a certificate of appealability ( “ COA” ) to appeal the denial of a postjudgment motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He request in forma pauperis ( “ IFP ” ) status on appeal. The postjudgment motion is construed as a motion made under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)

. See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc. , 784 F.2d 665, 667

− 68 (5th Cir. 1986) (en banc); F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 60(b). In his m otion , Richardson , in an attempt to reopen the time limit for seeking relief from this court, sought to hav e the district court reinstate its order of dismissal of his § 2255 motion

. Because the motion merely sought to reinstate appellate jurisdiction, and did not constitute an attack on the district court’s resolution of his claims on the merits or add a new ground for relief, a COA is un

necessary. See Gonzalez v. Crosby , 545 U.S. 524, 532

− 33 (2005); Dunn v. Cockrell , 302 F.3d 491 , 491

− 92 & n.1 (5th Cir. 2002)

. Richardson’s case is therefore before this court on his motion to appeal IFP, and this court’s inquiry “is limited to whether the appeal involves ‘legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).’” Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5t h Cir. 1983) (citation omitted). T he district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Richardson’s motion

. See Perez v. Stephens , 745 F.3d 174, 177

− 79 (5th Cir. 2014 ) ; Hernandez v. Thaler, 6 30 F. 3 d 420, 428 (5th Cir. 2011); Dunn , 302 F.3d at 492− 93

. T his appeal lacks arguable merit and is DISMISSED. See Howard , 707 F.2d at 220 ; 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. The motion for a COA is DENIED as

unneces sary. The motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. Case: 16-31257 Document: 00514188171 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/09/2017
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5558 

To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on certain girls’ trousers and breeches. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on certain girls’ 

trousers and breeches. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN GIRLS’ TROUSERS AND BREECHES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5558 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Girls’ knitted or crocheted 

trousers and breeches of 

synthetic fibers, the foregoing containing 5 percent 

or more by weight of elastomeric yarn or rubber 

thread and not imported as 

parts of playsuits (provided 

for in subheading 

6104.63.20) ....................... 14.5% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 17, 2016

t1110 

# Order

Clerk November 17, 2016

154041

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154041

COA: 324856

Macomb CC: 2009

- 002637

- FC

DWAYNE EDMUND WILSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED , because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Adam Wasserman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Explorations Group,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
aspects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report.

4. Both myself and the chief executive officer are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this annual report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. Based on our most recent evaluation:

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. We have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls and in other factors that could significantly
affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date: March 29, 2004

/s/ Adam Wasserman
------------------
Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer
Explorations Group, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-454-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, files this 

disclosure statement pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and states the 

following: WSOU Investments, LLC is a private corporation whose parent is WSOU Holdings, 

LLC. Neither entity is public traded.

Dated: June 4, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge

Texas State Bar No. 24059147 

Ryan S. Loveless

Texas State Bar No. 24036997 

Travis L. Richins

Texas State Bar No. 24061296

ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Telephone: (817) 470-7249

Facsimile: (817) 887-5950

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 6 Filed 06/04/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document was served upon all counsel of record via the Court's 

CM/ECF electronic filing system in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on June 

4, 2020.

/s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 6 Filed 06/04/20 Page 2 of 2
#### DORSETT v. STATE.

No. 25658.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1952.

L. G. Mathews, Brownsville, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant was charged by complaint and information with the theft of two tires alleged to be of the value of $10, and upon a charge authorizing the assessment of a fine only because of the voluntary return of the property within a reasonable time and before any prosecution was commenced, the jury assessed the punishment at a fine of $200.

The sole question raised is as to the sufficiency of the evidence.

According to the testimony of the owner of the tires, he parked his car shortly after 6 o’clock A. M. and as he walked away he heard tires squeak, glanced over his shoulder and saw a car parking immediately 'behind his. He proceeded- on his way to the post office but again looked back and noticed the hood or trunk of a car raised. He again walked on but remembering he had two recapped tires in the trunk of his car, again looked and saw a man loading two tires into the rear seat of the car parked immediately behind his car.

He then started back and saw the car that was parked behind his pull out into the street and recognized appellant, known to him only as “Charlie”, as the driver of such car. He called out, “Charlie; wait a minute, I want to talk to you.” Appellant waved but did not stop.

Upon reporting the loss of the tires to the police headquarters, it was found that appellant had left the missing tires at the police station saying he had found them in the street.

Appellant testified that he did find the tires in the street and took them to the police. He denied that he removed them from the trunk of the car and was corroborated by a defense witness.

It was shown that appellant’s car was similar to that in which the owner left the tires, and that the tires in question would fit appellant’s car. If the owner’s testimony be accepted, there was no time during which the tires could have been removed before appellant arrived.

The jury accepted the state’s version, and the evidence sustains their verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00010-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.L., L.S., and J.A.T.

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PA-01411

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 20, 2013

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

This is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory Permanency Hearing Order signed 

December 11, 2012, after a permanency hearing in a suit by the Department of Family and 

Protective Services seeking termination of the parental rights of appellant to his child. No final 

judgment of termination has been entered. The permanency order states that trial is scheduled 

for May 16, 2013.

The Texas Family Code permits a party to appeal “a final order” in a suit affecting the 

parent-child relationship. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(b) (West Supp. 2012). The Family 

Code expressly precludes an interlocutory appeal from a trial court’s temporary orders. See TEX.

FAM. CODE ANN. § 105.001(e) (West 2008). Accordingly, because it appeared this court lacks 

jurisdiction over this appeal, on January 16, 2013, this court ordered appellant to show cause in 
04-13-00010-CV

- 2 -

writing why this appeal should not be dismissed. No response has been filed. Therefore, we 

dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Barney A. Richmond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Annual Report of Assurance Group, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, (i) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) that the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Assurance Group, Inc.



|                    |  |                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: April
8, 2011 |  | /S/    BARNEY
A.
RICHMOND    
|                    |  | Barney A. Richmond           
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Richard C. Turner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Annual Report of Assurance Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008, (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) that the information
contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Assurance Group, Inc.



|                    |  |                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: April
8, 2011 |  | /S/    RICHARD
C.
TURNER     
|                    |  | Richard C. Turner            
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                    |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          39,425
<SECURITIES>                                     9,915
<RECEIVABLES>                                  241,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,423
<INVENTORY>                                    262,163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               569,059
<PP&E>                                         255,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                 124,207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,000,790<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          283,529
<BONDS>                                         99,325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,218
<OTHER-SE>                                     493,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,000,790
<SALES>                                        629,677
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               629,677
<CGS>                                          400,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  400,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,820
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,866
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,240
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,311
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,929<F2>
<DISCONTINUED>                                   5,404
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,333
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
<FN>
<F1>Included in total assets is an investment in discontinued operations of
$60,699. 
<F2>Excluding a net after-tax charge of $26.9 million ($1.25 per diluted share)
from patent litigation and an after-tax gain of $4.2 million ($.20 per diluted
share) from a divestiture by Cylink Corporation, a 29 percent owned affiliate
of the Company, income from continuing operations would have been $28.6 million
($1.33 per diluted share).

</FN>
        


</TABLE>
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Kansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Kansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6      | 6      | 8      | 1      | 15     | 2      | 3      | 0      | 0      | 11    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60201-60202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25889]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Demonstration and Education Research 
Applications (R18s).
    Date: November 2, 2000.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton National Airport Hotel, 2399 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Contact Person: Louise P. Corman, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, Room 7180, Division of Extramural 
Affairs, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and

[[Page 60202]]

Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)


    Dated: September 29, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-25889 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

I, Floyd E. Wicks, Chief Executive Officer of American States Water Company and
Southern California Water Company (the Registrant), do hereby certify,
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350),
that, to my knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.                                                                                                                  

/s/ Floyd E. Wicks

Floyd E. Wicks
Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 14, 2003

65