alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Northrop Grumman Corporation ) ) Under Contract No. F 19628-00-C-O100 et al. ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59556

Karen L. Manos, Esq. Lindsay M. Paulin, Esq.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Washington, DC Linda T. Maramba, Esq.

Corporate Counsel

- Litigation E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Lawrence S. Rabyne, Esq.

Senior Trial Attorney Nygina T. Mills, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Arlington Heights, IL OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE PEACOCK It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b) and the parties' Settlement Agreement, dated 15 June 2016, resulting from an Alternative Dispute Resolution process and the parties' "STIPULATION FORENTRY OF JUDGMENT" (Stipulation), that the appeal is sustained. In the nature ofa consentjudgment, the Board determines that the government's share ofthe segment closing adjustment required by Cost Accounting Standard 413-50(c)(l2), resulting from the sale by Northrop Grumman Corporation ofits Data Systems Division-SanDiego, is $3,l 7 5,000, to be paid in accordance with the parties' Settlement Agreement and Stipulation. /, Dated: 7 July 2016

(Signatures continued) 

### /

R Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I concur

Administrative Judge Acting Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA No. 59556, Appeal ofNorthrop Grumman Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### Ex parte MALDONADO.

No. 23137.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 2, 1945.

See, also, 184 S.W.2d 859.

T. B. Monroe, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The proceeding is instituted for the purpose of securing the release of Charles Maldonado from the Gatesville State School for Boys.

The prosecution was instituted by complaint and information filed on the 25th day of May, 1943, in the County Court of Bexar County, Texas, at which time he plead guilty before the court and was by proper judgment declared to be a ward of the court and subject to his orders until he should reach the age of twenty-one years, which was found to be August 11, 1949. He was then committed to the Superintendent of the Bexar County School for Boys. We find no order in the record suspending his sentence but the record reflects that on the 29th day of August, 1944, a motion was filed by the Assistant Juvenile Officer asking that he be committed to the Gatesville State School for Boys. The motion sets out the conviction of May 27, 1943, as the basis for the commitment requested and says further that the sentence was suspended. It makes a charge that he “remains incorrigible, in that he continues to habitually so deport himself as to injure and endanger the morals and health of himself and others, * *

We are asked by the appellant’s brief to find from the above that relator was at the time of his conviction given a suspended sentence with the force and effect of a suspended sentence under our criminal procedure which, according to his contention, could not be revoked until he was convicted of another offense. It seems to be the interpretation given to the procedure that the motion filed on the 29th of August, 1944, was a new procedure and was in fact a complaint; that it was necessary to accompany this by information and to have a new trial. He cites Hogue v. State, 87 Tex.Cr.R. 170, 220 S.W. 96. We do not so interpret the procedure. It appears perfectly clear that this was only a motion filed in the court, by the proper authority, asking that whatever orders had been made relative to the juvenile be so modified as to then commit him to the State School for Boys at Gatesville. So understood the procedure is regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
[Letterhead of KPMG LLP]                Exhibit 99.2b



                         Independent Accountants' Report


The Boards of Directors
Countrywide Financial Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management Assertion, that Countrywide Financial Corporation and subsidiaries,
 including its wholly-owned subsidiary, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. ("CHL"),
and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL,
(collectively, the "Company") complied with the minimum servicing standards set
 forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended
 December 31, 2005. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
 compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing
 such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
 We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Countrywide Financial Corporation
 and subsidiaries, including its wholly-owned subsidiary, Countrywide Home
Loans, Inc. ("CHL"), and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a wholly-owned
 subsidiary of CHL, complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing
standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in
all material respects.


                               /s/ KPMG LLP


March 3, 2006












                                [Letterhead of Countrywide Home Loans]



                                Management Assertion


March 3, 2006


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, Countrywide Financial
Corporation and subsidiaries, including its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. ("CHL"), and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing,
 L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL, (collectively, the "Company") have
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set
forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
Attestation for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period, the Company
 had in effect a mortgage bankers' (fidelity) bond in the amount of $200
 million and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $100 million and
$130 million for the period January 1, 2005 to August 1, 2005 and for the
 period from August 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005, respectively.





/s/ Steve Bailey
---------------------------
Senior Managing Director and
Chief Executive Officer, Loan Administration


/s/ Kevin Meyers
---------------------------
Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer,
Loan Administration
Exhibit 99.1




                                 CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned officers of Standard  Microsystems  Corporation (the Company),  does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended May 31,  2003 of the
Company fully  complies,  in all material  respects,  with the  requirements  of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and  information
contained  in the Form 10-Q  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: July 15, 2003                       By: /s/ Steven J. Bilodeau
                                           --------------------------
                                                    (signature)

                                           Steven J. Bilodeau
                                           Chairman of the Board, President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer


                                           By: /s/ Andrew M. Caggia
                                           ------------------------
                                                     (signature)

                                           Andrew M. Caggia
                                           Senior Vice President - Finance
                                           and Chief Financial Officer




A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5475 

To suspend temporarily the duty on polycrystalline alumina discharge tubes 

prefilled with metal halide salts and designated for high intensity discharge (HID) lamps. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on polycrystalline alumina 

discharge tubes prefilled with metal halide salts and designated for high intensity discharge (HID) lamps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLYCRYSTALLINE ALUMINA DISCHARGE 

4 TUBES PREFILLED WITH METAL HALIDE 

5 SALTS AND DESIGNATED FOR HIGH INTEN6 SITY DISCHARGE (HID) LAMPS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5475 IH

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Polycrystalline Alumina 

discharge tubes prefilled 

with metal halide salts 

(CAS Nos. 65997–17–3, 

266–046–0, 7439–97–6, 

231–106–7, 7440–33–7, 

231–143–9, 7681–82–5, 

231–143–9, 7681–82–5, 

231–679–3, 7790–30–9, 

230–199–7, 10102–68–8, 

233–276–8, 15474–63–2, 

239–493–4, 13813–41–7, 

and 237–470–3) and designated for high intensity 

discharge (HID) lamps 

(provided for in subheading 8539.90.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

----

III Objave

Evropska agencija za zdravila

----

ZAPOSLOVANJE KADROV ZA EVROPSKO AGENCIJO ZA ZDRAVILA (LONDON)

(2006/C 155 A/01)

Agencija je odgovorna za usklajevanje vrednotenja in nadzora zdravil za uporabo v humani in veterinarski medicini v Evropski uniji (glej Uredbo (ES) št. 726/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004, Uradni list Evropske unijeL 136, z dne 30. aprila 2004). Evropska agencija za zdravila je bila ustanovljena januarja 1995. Agencija tesno sodeluje z Evropsko komisijo, 25 državami članicami EU, državami EGP/EFTA in številnimi drugimi skupinami v državnem in zasebnem sektorju.

Dodatne informacije o Evropski agenciji za zdravila in njenih dejavnostih so vam na voljo preko medmrežja na našem spletnem naslovu http://www.emea.europa.eu/.

Evropska agencija za zdravila organizira izbirne postopke za pripravo rezervnih seznamov za:

Izbrani kandidati se vključijo na rezervni seznam in lahko se jim, odvisno od stanja proračuna, ponudi petletna obnovljiva pogodba v skladu s Pogoji za zaposlovanje drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti (Uradni list Evropskih skupnostiL 56 z dne 4. marca 1968).

Kraj zaposlitve je London.

Kandidati morajo biti državljani države članice Evropskih skupnosti ali Islandije, Norveške ali Lihtenštajna, pod pogojem, da uživajo vse državljanske pravice.

Celotne pogoje, opis dela in potreben obrazec prijave si je treba prenesti s spletne strani EMEAhttp://www.emea.europa.eu/htms/general/admin/recruit/recruitnew.htm.Prijava mora biti ustrezno opremljena s podpisom in datirana ter mora biti skupaj z vso dokazno dokumentacijo poslana najkasneje do 15. avgusta 2006(datum poštnega žiga) na naslednji naslov:EMEA – Head of Personnel, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London E14 4HB, United Kingdom (tel. (44-207) 41 88 400; faks (44-207) 41 88 416).

V prihodnje Uradni list ne bo več samodejno poslan na naslove z e-seznamov. Če bi želeli prejemati obvestila o objavah, se, prosimo, vpišite v spletni register na naslovuhttp://www.emea.europa.eu"Online Mailing Service".

----
|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                
|Wyoming Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                
|Wyoming Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 20     | 27     | 254    | 11     | 15     | 18     | 3      | 62     | 87     | 9     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 17     | 17     | 4      | 55     | 25     | 53     | 33     | 1      | 35     | 9     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 8      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Gilford HALL, Appellant, v. Mrs. J. D. RAINEY, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 10, 1954.

Tackett & Tackett, Prestonsburg, for appellant.

Paul C. Combs and R. S. Wellman, Pres-tonsburg, for appellee.

' PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Gilford Hall, has made a motion for appeal from a judgment of the *569Floyd Circuit Court, which awarded appel-lee, Mrs. J. D. Rainey, damages in the sum of $803, resulting from the conversion of her property, and which dismissed a counterclaim filed by appellant.

We have reviewed the record and find no error which we consider to be prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights.

Motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Disclosure

1 David B. Kuznick

On June 25th, 1984 I was still a student at Hunter College High School. I was entering 

the subway at my home station, reached into my backpack, and pulled out my school-issued 

subway pass to show the attendant as I went through the gate (the normal way to use it in those 

days). A police officer stopped me and told me he was citing me for trespassing. At first, I did 

not know what he was talking about. Then I noticed that I had pulled my previous month's pass 

out of my backpack inadvertently, rather than the current month's pass. When I tried to explain 

this to the officer and ask him to let me get the correct one out, he told me if I said anything else 

he would take me to jail. My initial court date was at the Queens Criminal Courthouse, 125-01 

Queens Boulevard, Kew Gardens, NY, 11415. This was in early July 1984, most likely. When 

the judge arraigned me, he told me I should probably get an attorney because if I pled guilty in 

front of him he would put me in jail because I had the previous trespassing charge, even though 

it had been dismissed (see below). I hired the mother of a friend of mine, Eleanor Burstein, a 

local attorney who lived at 111-28 75th Rd., Forest Hills, NY, 11375. She is now deceased. At 

my next court date in August 1984, Attorney Burstein explained the situation to the judge and 

showed him that I in fact had the correct subway pass, and had nothing on my record other than 

these charges. The judge dismissed the charge.

The earlier incident took place around the fall of 1981 or 1982; I simply do not remember 

and do not have records from then. I was attending Hunter College High School at 94th Street 

and Park Avenue in Manhattan, NY. I was taking swimming for Physical Education, which took 

place at Hunter College, which is at 68th Street and Lexington Avenue. At that time, students 

were given subway passes that were technically only valid at their home station and at the High 

School's station. However, we were informed by school administration that we could use them 

at the Hunter College stop because we were attending a required school class. On one such 

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 1 of 2
Disclosure

2 David B. Kuznick

occasion, when using the pass at the Hunter College station after swimming class, I was stopped 

by police and given a citation for trespassing, I believe. I appeared in court in Manhattan a few 

months later on my court date (perhaps December, 1986 or 1987). I believe it was the New York 

Criminal Court at 100 Centre Street, NY, NY. At my arraignment, I explained my story to the 

judge. He told me that he would dismiss the charge, but that the school was wrong, and that I 

was not to use the pass like that again. I had stopped using the pass for swim class after the 

citation and never used it again like that.

David B. Kuznick

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 2 of 2
#### Antonio FIRO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27166.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 10, 1954.

R. Richard Thornton, Bryan F. Williams, Jr., Galveston, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, life imprisonment.

Bartender Alvarez testified that the appellant and deceased, who were man and wife, came to his place of business at four o’clock in the afternoon on the day of the homicide and that the appellant drank beer until approximately seven o’clock, when he departed, leaving the deceased in the bar. Alvarez stated that at about 8:30 the • appellant returned, went to the table where deceased was seated, had a few words with her, and then began to shoot her; that the deceased began to run, and the appellant continued to shoot her even after she had fallen to the floor, after which the appellant inquired of him if he had anything to say and then left the bar.

Appellant, testifying in his own behalf, stated that the fatal weapon belonged to the deceased, his common-law wife; that he had carried' it with him when he left the tavern; that upon his return he found the deceased sitting at a table with an old-man; that he asked her what she was doing; that she gave him an ugly reply; and that he -went out of his mind and shot her. He ' stated that he fired about two shots into the deceased while she was sitting down and then continued to shoot after she got up and after she was- on the floor. He stated that he -left, went to another bar and ordered another beer.

Bill of exception No. 1 complains of the refusal of the trial court to grant a inistrlal when the assistant county attorney, testifying for the State, stated that the deceased had come to see him on the day of the homicide and that she bore fresh bruise marks.

Upon the appellant’s objection, the careful trial court, out of an abundance of caution, instructed the jury not to consider the statement regarding the bruises.

Such a statement could have been injurious to the appellant only if the jury be*371lieved that the appellant had inflicted the injuries.

We think that any such injuries, if inflicted by the appellant, would be admissible by virtue of Article 1257a, Vernon’s Ann. P.C., which provides, in part: “In all prosecutions for felonious homicide the State or the defendant shall be permitted to offer testimony as to . * * , * the previous relationship existing between the accused and the deceased * * *.”

We commend the very able and conscientious court appointed counsel for their sincere representation of their .unfortunate client.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of .the trial court is affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James W. Martin, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.), rendered October 1, 1987, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the first degree.

Defendant’s plea of guilty to one count of burglary in the first degree was in full satisfaction of a six-count indictment. The plea was also made with the understanding that the prison sentence could range from 3 *Vs*to 10 years up to 5 to 15 years. Under these circumstances, the fact that defendant now admits that he has a drug and alcohol problem does not demonstrate either extraordinary circumstances or an abuse of discretion by County Court in imposing the lesser sentence of *3 Vs*to 10 years *(see, People v Mackey,*136 AD2d 780, *lv denied*71 NY2d 899).

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.