alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

AND EMC CORPORATION, 

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00477-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

LETTER OF REQUEST FOR FOREIGN DISCOVERY
1

Defendants Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., and EMC Corporation, (collectively 

“Defendants”) seek foreign discovery from third party witnesses residing in France. Defendants 

have attached an Appendix with a Letter of Request which includes Document Requests and

Deposition Topics. Defendants respectfully request that the Court execute the Letter of Request

attached as Appendix D. Defendants further request that, after the Court has signed the Letter of 

Request, the Clerk of this Court authenticate the Court’s signature under the seal of this Court, and 

return the original signed and sealed executed Letter, and two certified copies of the signed and 

sealed executed Letters, to Defendants’ counsel, Barry K. Shelton, for delivery to the proper 

authority.

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, indicated 

that it reserves the right to serve its own foreign discovery in the future.

Dated: November 6, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Attorneys for Defendants
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 6, 2020, all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the 

Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 479 

To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor 

of George Henry White. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2011 

Mr. BUTTERFIELD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage 

stamp in honor of George Henry White. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GEORGE HENRY WHITE COMMEMORATIVE 

4 POSTAGE STAMP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Postmaster General shall 

6 issue a commemorative postage stamp in honor of George 

7 Henry White. 

8 (b) SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.—Such stamp— 

9 (1) shall be issued in the denomination used for 

10 first class mail up to one ounce in weight; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 479 IH

1 (2) shall bear such designs as the Postmaster 

2 General shall determine; and 

3 (3) shall be placed on sale as soon as prac4 ticable after the date of the enactment of this Act 

5 and shall be sold for such period thereafter as the 

6 Postmaster General shall determine. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                                         
|Louisiana Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                         
|Louisiana Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,996  | 5,811  | 6,193  | 2,842 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5,168  | 3,902  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7023

DANIEL LEVERN STALEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARION COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; MR. WT, Head Jailer; JANE DOE, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (9:05-cv-03113-PMD) Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 11, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Levern Staley, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Albert Baroody, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Daniel Levern Staley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Staley that failure to file timely and specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. As the district court found, despite this warning, Staley failed to file specific objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see alsoThomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Staley has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of TSR Consulting Services, Inc., Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 14, 1989, which assessed TSR Consulting Services, Inc. for additional unemployment insurance contributions.

The record supports the determination that the computer consultants engaged by TSR Consulting Services, Inc. (hereinafter TSR) were its employees and not independent contractors. The contract agreements the consultants signed with TSR restricted their activities with TSR’s clients, they were required to keep time sheets and were paid by TSR, and TSR alone solicited the clients who were to be serviced by the consultants *(see, Matter of Gentile Nursing Servs. [Roberts], 65*NY2d 622). The powers reserved by TSR sufficiently established the necessary direction and control for the consultants to be considered employees and therefore there is substantial evidence to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s determination *(see, Matter of Concourse Ophthalmology Assocs. [Roberts],*60 NY2d 734, 736). TSR’s remaining contentions have been addressed and found lacking in merit.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the annual report of Midnight Candle Company (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Helen C. Cary, acting
in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Patrick
Deparini, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Helen C.
Cary


Helen
C. Cary


Chief
Executive Officer


March
31, 2009





/s/Patrick
Deparini


Patrick
Deparini


Chief
Financial Officer


March
31, 2009
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2396

_____________________________

DEREK HIGHT,

Appellant,

v.

LINDA CAMPBELL, RODERICK 

CAMPBELL, IVY RENEE WEBB,

RICKY CAMPBELL, REGINALD 

CAMPBELL, RONALD CAMPBELL 

and TORONTO CAMPBELL, In Re: 

Estate of Kelly W. Campbell, 

Appellees.

___________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Victor L. Hulslander, Judge.

February 22, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Rose v. Sonson, 208 So. 3d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2016).

RAY, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Taso M. Milonas of Taso M. Milonas, P.A., Sarasota and JudyAnn Smith of Judy-Ann Smith Law Firm, P.A., Jacksonville, for 

Appellant.

Jordan Hammer and Jeffrey H. Skatoff of Clark Skatoff P.A., 

Palm Beach Gardens, for Appellees Roderick Campbell, Ivy 

Renee Webb, Ricky Campbell, Reginald Campbell, Ronald 

Campbell, and Toronto Campbell.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00458-ADA 

PATENT CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF READINESS

Pursuant to the Standing Order Regarding Notice of Readiness in Patent Cases issued by 

this Court, Plaintiff hereby notifies the Court that this case is ready for an initial Case Management 

Conference.

The following cases in this District are related in that they involve the same Plaintiff and 

the same Defendant. However, the patents asserted are unique to each case and unrelated to each 

other. 

6:20-CV-00454-ADA

6:20-CV-00455-ADA

6:20-CV-00456-ADA

6:20-CV-00457-ADA

6:20-CV-00458-ADA

6:20-CV-00459-ADA

6:20-CV-00460-ADA

6:20-CV-00461-ADA

6:20-CV-00462-ADA

6:20-CV-00463-ADA

6:20-CV-00464-ADA

6:20-CV-00465-ADA

Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 22 Filed 09/04/20 Page 1 of 2
Dated: September 4, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Ryan S. Loveless

James L. Etheridge

Texas State Bar No. 24059147

Ryan S. Loveless

Texas State Bar No. 24036997

Travis L. Richins

Texas State Bar No. 24061296

Brett A. Mangrum

Texas State Bar No. 24065671

Jeffrey Huang

ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Telephone: (817) 470-7249

Facsimile: (817) 887-5950

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com

Brett@EtheridgeLaw.com

JeffH@EtheridgeLaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document was served upon all counsel of record via email in 

accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on September 4, 2020.

/s/ Ryan S. Loveless

Ryan S. Loveless

Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 22 Filed 09/04/20 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2113

JOYCE S. KIMBLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; MONTGOMERY

COUNTY GOVERNMENT,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA00-234-PJM)

Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joyce S. Kimble, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Prestigiacomo Via,

Assistant County Attorney, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joyce S. Kimble appeals the order of the district court granting motions to dismiss her complaint as to Defendants Montgomery

County Public Schools and the Montgomery County Government, and

deferring action on a motion to dismiss the Montgomery County Board

of Education to allow Kimble to amend her complaint. We dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The

order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas,*                    the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for “the establishment * * * of * * * foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for other purposes,” and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) to grant to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;                

*Whereas,*                    the Board's regulations (15 CFR part 400) provide for the establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results in a significant public benefit and is in the public interest;                

*Whereas,*                    the Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 7, has made application for authority to establish special-purpose subzone status at the steel can processing facilities of Mani Can Corporation (Inc.), located in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico (FTZ Docket 36-96, filed May 7, 1996);                

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (61 FR 24271, May 14, 1996); and,                

*Whereas,*                    the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations have not been satisfied, and that approval of the application is not in the public interest;                

*Now, therefore,*                    the Board hereby disapproves the application for subzone status at the easy-open steel can processing facilities of Mani Can Corporation (Inc.), located in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico.                

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of January 2000.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Dennis Puccinelli,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-2588 Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 60361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26076]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD11-00-011]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Sacramento River, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District has approved a 
temporary deviation to the regulations governing the opening of the 
Isleton bascule drawbridge at mile 18.7 over the Sacramento River, 
Solano County, CA. The approval specifies that the bridge need not open 
for vessel traffic from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. on 23 October 2000. This 
deviation is to allow California Department of Transportation to 
perform essential maintenance on the bridge.

DATES: Effective period of the deviation is from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. on 23 
October 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David H. Sulouff, Chief, Bridge 
Section; Eleventh Coast Guard District, Bldg 50-6 Coast Guard Island, 
Alameda, CA 94501-5100, telephone (510) 437-3516.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Isleton Drawbridge, mile 18.7, over the 
Sacramento River, Solano County, CA, provides 18 feet vertical 
clearance above Mean Lower Low Water when closed. Vessels that can pass 
under the bridge without an opening may do so at all times. This 
deviation has been coordinated with commercial operators and various 
marinas on the waterway. No objections were received. The normal 
drawbridge regulation requires the bridge to open on signal from May 1 
through October 31 from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., and from November 1 through 
April 30 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. At all other times, the draws shall open 
on signal if at least four hours notice is given.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed 
with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as 
soon as possible. This deviation from the normal operating regulations 
in 33 CFR 117.5 is authorized in accordance with the provisions of 33 
CFR 117.35.

    Dated: September 29, 2000.
C.D. Wurster,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 00-26076 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSNG AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

 Plaintiff,

-vsMICROSOFT CORPORATION,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 6:20-CV-00454-ADA

CASE NO. 6:20-CV-00461-ADA

CASE NO. 6:20-CV-00465-ADA

ORDER SETTING VOIR DIRE AND PRE-VOIR DIRE CONFERENCE

This matter is before the Court on its own Motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for a Video Conference to discuss 

voir dire protocol with the Honorable Judge Jeffrey C. Manske at 1:30 p.m., Thursday, June

16, 2022. The conference will be conducted by video at https://txwduscourts.zoomgov.com/j/1611260782?pwd=SXhoWHAvUWxTWW5JUy8vbWU1N1dsZz09

and will be attended by at least one counsel for each party having appeared as of the date of this 

Order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that voir dire is set before the undersigned for 9:00 a.m., 

Tuesday, June 21, 2022 in District Courtroom #1, on the Third Floor of the United States 

Courthouse, 800 Franklin Ave., Waco, TX.

SIGNED this 7th day of June, 2022.

JEFFREY C. MANSKE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 181 Filed 06/07/22 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(b)

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (Amendment) is entered into as
of June 25, 2001, between JACOBSON STORES INC., a Michigan corporation of
Jackson, Michigan (the "Company"), and P. GERALD MILLS, of Chelsea, Michigan
("Mills").

         THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE that the restated Employment Agreement between
them dated as of June 11, 1998, as amended effective April 11, 1999, April 16,
2000 and April 3, 2001 (the "Agreement"), is further amended effective June 25,
2001, as follows:

         1. EMPLOYMENT AND TERM. Paragraph 1 of the Agreement is amended to read
as follows:

                  "1. EMPLOYMENT AND TERM. The Company employs Mills as Chairman
         of the Board, and Mills agrees to serve in that capacity and/or in such
         other capacity or capacities as the Board of Directors of the Company
         deems advisable, for a term commencing October 31, 1996 and continuing
         through April 15, 2002, unless terminated sooner pursuant to the
         provisions of paragraph 5, for the compensation and on the terms set
         forth in this Agreement."

         Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue in
full force and effect.


IN THE PRESENCE OF:                JACOBSON STORES INC.


/s/ Lynne A. Gatz                  By:      Paul W. Gilbert
-----------------------                     ------------------------------
                                            Paul W. Gilbert
                                            Its:  Vice Chairman of the Board


/s/ Margaret Crandall                       /s/ P. Gerald Mills
-----------------------                     -------------------
                                                P. Gerald Mills