alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5410 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5410

To suspend temporarily the duty on power supplies between 150 watts and 
                               500 watts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Mr. Honda introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on power supplies between 150 watts and 
                               500 watts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POWER SUPPLIES BETWEEN 150 WATTS AND 500 WATTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Power supplies      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          between 150 watts                                                 12/31/2015
                          and 500 watts
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8504.40.95)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.3

                           Report of Arthur Andersen

To the Board of Directors and the Shareholders of
NTT DoCoMo, Inc.:

  We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of NTT DoCoMo, Inc. (a
Japanese corporation and a majority-owned subsidiary of Nippon Telegraph and
Telephone Corporation) and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2001, and the related
consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audit.

  We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

  In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NTT
DoCoMo, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2001, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

/s/ Arthur Andersen

Tokyo, Japan
August 3, 2001
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.25

                                 THIRD AMENDMENT
                             THE EXCESS BENEFIT PLAN
                                       OF
                          THE PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION


WHEREAS, the Applera Corporation ("Company") last restated The Excess Benefit
Plan of The Perkin-Elmer Corporation ("Plan") effective October 1, 1995; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company pursuant to Section 6.1 of the
Plan reserves the right to amend the Plan from time to time; and

WHEREAS, it has been determined that an amendment is required at this time.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan be amended with the effective date as stipulated below:


1.       Effective January 1, 2001, Section 4.2 of the Plan is amended in its
         entirety and shall now reads as follows:

         "Section 4.2 - Form of Benefit Payment. Benefits payable to or on
         behalf of an Employee or his Beneficiary resulting from the provisions
         of Section 4.1 shall be payable as follows:

         a)       A benefit payable under Section 4.1(a) shall be paid in
                  monthly installments after adjustment in accordance with the
                  optional form of benefits elected under the Pension Plan.
                  Notwithstanding, if the lump sum present value of an
                  Employee's benefit at time of payment is equal to or less than
                  $5,000, such benefit shall be paid in a lump sum.

         b)       The form of a benefit payable under Section 4.1(b) shall be
                  subject to the discretion of the Committee. It may be paid in
                  the form of a lump sum, a term certain annuity, single life
                  annuity, joint and survivor annuity or by a combination of
                  such methods. Notwithstanding, if the Employee's Account at
                  time of payment is equal to or less than $5,000, such Account
                  shall be paid in a lump sum."
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5490 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain injection-molded ABS or PP 

cases or containers to be used for electronic drawing toys or electronic 

games. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. REICHERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain injection-molded 

ABS or PP cases or containers to be used for electronic 

drawing toys or electronic games. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN INJECTION MOLDED ABS OR PP 

4 CASES OR CONTAINERS TO BE USED FOR 

5 ELECTRONIC DRAWING TOYS OR ELEC6 TRONIC GAMES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5490 IH

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Cases or containers (provided for in subheading 

4202.99.90), made of injection molded ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) 

or PP (polypropylene), specially shaped or fitted for, 

and with labeling, logo or 

other descriptive information on the exterior of the 

case or container indicating an intention to be 

used for, electronic drawing toys or electronic 

games of heading 9503 or 

9504. ................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2016 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### RANDALL v. STATE.

No. 24555.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 14, 1949.

Edward L. Dunlap, Victoria, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was charged with an aggravated assault, and upon his plea of guilt, he was assessed a fine of $500 and six months in jail.

He filed a motion for a new trial setting forth many matters as erroneous in such trial, some of which will not be herein discussed.

He does show that the date of this alleged offense was shown in the complaint as June 28, 1949, but it appears from the information that such date is set forth as July 28, 1949. It also appears that this trial was had on June 30, 1949, lacking two days of a month prior to the alleged date of the offense as shown in the information. Therefore, it would be an impossibility for the appellant to -have been tried on June 30, 1949, for an offense committed 28 days thereafter, or on July 28, 1949. Such information also fails to allege that such offense was committed anterior to the date of the filing thereof. See Art. 414, subd. 6, C.C.P.; Cobb v. State, 139 Tex.Cr.R. 337, 139 S.W.2d 272; Hoot v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.App. 316, 194 S.W.2d 97; Martini v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 205 S.W.2d 988.

A failure of the complaint and information to correspond may be considered in the absence of a bill of exception. See 4 Tex.Jur. p. 208, sec. 149.

Because of the failure in such correspondence, this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7859

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL C. BARSON, a/k/a Dusty Rhodes, a/k/a

Skip Town, a/k/a Michael Charles, a/k/a Bill

Daley,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CR-94-327)

Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 30, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael C. Barson, Appellant Pro Se. Randy I. Bellows, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We note that Barson's notice of appeal evinces a desire to

appeal from the denial of his prior § 2255 motion as well. His

notice, however, falls far outside the appeal period specified by

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). His attempt to appeal from that order is

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

2

PER CURIAM:

Michael C. Barson appeals from the district court's order

denying, as successive, his motion brought under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error in its determination that Barson's instant motion is successive and properly

denied for failure to obtain leave from this Court to file a

successive motion. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Barson, No. CR-94-327 (E.D. Va. June 24 & Oct. 25, 1996).* We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### JOHNSON v. CRAVENS.

No. 2830.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Nov. 3, 1950.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 1, 1950.

*288John O. Harris, Coleman, for appellant.

William O. Breedlove, Brownwood, for appellee.

LONG, Justice.

H. L. Cravens sued Dr. Jane L. Johnson in Brown County upon an open account for premiums on a liability insurance policy. Dr. Johnson filed a plea -of privilege to be sued in Coleman County which she alleged was the county of her residence. Mr. Cravens controverted this plea and alleged the residence of Dr. Johnson to be in Brown County. Upon a hearing to the court, the plea of privilege was overruled. Dr. Johnson has appealed.

Appellant contends the evidence is insufficient to sustain the finding of the trial court that she was a resident of Brown County. We have carefully considered the evidence and have concluded that this point should be overruled.

Appellant owned a residence and a swimming pool at a place in Brown County known as Hot Wells. She also owned an office building in the City of Coleman in Coleman County. About one year before the filing of this suit, appellant appeared at the office of appellee and represented to him that she lived in Brownwood and that she wanted to make a loan with Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Company upon her Coleman property. She advised appellee many times that her home was in Brownwood. Mr. Cravens testified that she made this representation as to her place of residence at the time he sold her the insurance involved here; that thereafter on each month he mailed her a statement of the account to her address in Brown-wood; that none of these letters were returned to him; furthermore, the evidence discloses that appellant, at the date of the trial, had some furniture in the home owned by her in Brownwood.

Appellant was not present at the trial of this case. There is no explanation of her absence. Her son testified that he did not know where she was at that time. She did not see fit to appear and submit herself to cross-examination on the question of the place of her residence. This, together with the other facts and circumstances in the record, we deem -sufficient to sustain the finding of the trial court that she resided in Brown County. There was evidence that Dr. Johnson made her home in Coleman but it 'is our duty to view the evidence in its most favorable light in support of the judgment.

 Appellant also contends the court erred in overruling the plea of privilege because appellee failed to prove a cause of action against appellant. We recognize the rule that in order to overcome a plea of privilege plaintiff -must introduce evidence sufficient to show a meritorious cause of action against the defendant. This rule, however, does not apply unless the existence of a cause of action is a venue fact. This being a suit on an open account, we are of the opinion that the existence of cause of action is not a venue fact and that it. was not necessary for appellee to show that he had a meritorious cause of action against appellant. Hermer v. Monnig Dry Goods Co., Tex.Civ.App., 77 S.W.2d 895.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000092195
<NAME> SOUTHERN INDIANA GAS AND ELECTRIC CO

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      731,611
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      5,961
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          90,864
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        45,780
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 874,216
<COMMON>                                        78,258
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            246,127
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 324,385
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,282
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           169,799
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             104,084
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   53,700
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 202,966
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  874,216
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      185,003
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            11,865
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     143,653
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     155,518
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         29,485
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 286
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  29,771
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         9,378
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,393
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        539
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   19,854
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        16,191
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        7,381
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          54,356
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2003, of Southern Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,
certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                          /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Greg G. Gruber
                                          Senior Vice President,
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)

                                          May 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Southern Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Southern
Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, 

Defendants.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00479-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

LETTERS OF REQUEST FOR FOREIGN DISCOVERY FROM ISRAEL
1

Defendants’, Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., and EMC Corporation, (collectively 

“Defendants”), seek foreign discovery from a third party witness residing in Israel. Defendants 

have attached an Appendix with a Letter of Request which includes Document Requests and 

Deposition Topics. The chart below outlines the name of the witness Defendants seek foreign 

discovery from, the relevant case number, and the Patent at issue. 

Appx. Name of Witness 

Entity

Relevance of 

Witness/Entity Case No. U.S. Pat. No.

A Danny Raz Named inventor 6:20-cv-00479 8,402,129

Defendants respectfully request that the Court execute the Letter of Request attached as 

Appendix A. Defendants further request that, after the Court has signed the Letter of Request, the 

Clerk of this Court authenticate the Court’s signature under the seal of this Court, and return the 

original signed and sealed executed Letter, and two certified copies of the signed and sealed 

executed Letter, to Defendants’ counsel, Barry K. Shelton, for delivery to the proper authority.

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, indicated 

that it reserves the right to serve its own foreign discovery in the future.
2 

Dated: November 6, 2020 By: /s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029 

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com 

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Ste. 205 

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165 

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Benjamin Hershkowitz 

bhershkowitz@gibsondunn.com 

Brian A. Rosenthal 

brosenthal@gibsondunn.com 

Allen Kathir

akathir@gibsondunn.com 

Kyanna Sabanoglu 

ksabanoglu@gibsondunn.com 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Ave. 

New York, NY 10166-0193 

Telephone: (212) 351-4000 

Facsimile: (212) 351-4035 

Y. Ernest Hsin

ehsin@gibsondunn.com

Jaysen S. Chung

jschung@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

555 Mission St., Ste. 3000

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921

Telephone: (415) 393-8200

Facsimile: (415) 393-8306

Ryan K. Iwahashi

riwahashi@gibsondunn.com 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

1881 Page Mill Rd. 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1211 

Telephone: (650) 849-5300 

Facsimile: (650) 849-5333 

Attorneys for Defendants
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 6, 2020, all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the 

Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). 

/s/ Barry K. Shelton 

Barry K. Shelton
# ^4^^ee - (4-j.e £

/ ATTORNE Y 

# IV I JAN- ^ 211)0 . 

# HEARJM G DOCKE T Decembe r 20 , 201 1 Hearin g Docke t

Cler k Federal Aviatio n Administratio n SO O Independenc e Ave , S W Roo m924 A Washington , D C 2059 1 Re : /// th e Matte r

o/K.S . Aviation , Inc . (l/b/aSierr aAcadem y o f Aeronautic s FDMSNo . FAA-20n-048 3 82 8 STRATFOR D COUR T DE L ^AAR.C A 92014-272 7 DIREC T 858.792.178 9 FA X 858.792.179 9 MOBIL E 858.401.988 2

f

> c/ 5 Dea r Clerk : I n connectio n wit

h th e abov e matter , pleas e ad dm y name t o th e Servic e Lis t a s Respondent' s counsel , anddelet e Cyri l Lawrence . Than k you . Ver> ' truj y yours , Rober t J . Flaje k /ds b .. -

Offjcf s i n Del Mar , Rniidi o Sant aFe , L ajolla , an dDmoioTt'

n Sa n Die^^ o
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 1 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 2 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 3 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 4 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 5 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 6 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 7 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 8 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 9 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 10 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 11 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 12 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 13 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 14 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 15 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 16 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 17 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 18 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 19 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 20 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 21 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 22 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 23 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 24 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 25 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 26 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 27 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 28 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 29 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 30 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 31 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 32 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 33 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 34 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 35 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 36 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 37 of 38
Case 5:20-cv-00603-JKP Document 1-1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 38 of 38