T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J EA N M I LLER, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. B U T T E C O U N T Y S H E R IF F ’S D E P A R T M E N T ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 17293 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 6 - c v - 0 0 4 8 9 - J A MDA D ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn A . M e nde z , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r27, 2011 ** B efo re: H A W K IN S , S IL V E R M A N , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Je an M i l l erappeal s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s s um m ary j ud gm enti n h er 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on al l egi ng const i tut i on alvi ol at i on s a ss oci at ed w i th h er i n c a r c e r a t i o n i n th e Bu tt e Co u n tyJ a i l . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. 

# FI LED OC T 07 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 17293 2 § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . Je t t v. P enner , 4 3 9 F .3 d1 0 9 1 , 1 0 9 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y grant ed sum m ary j ud gm enton M i l l er ’ s c l ai m that her pl ac em enti n j ai l ra ther than i n the S heri ff’ s W ork A l t ernat i ve P rogram ( “ S W A P ” ) vi ol a t e d he rdue pr oc e s s r i ght s be c aus e M i l l e rc onc e de d tha ts he di d not ha ve al i be rtyi nt e r e s ti n pa rt i c i pa t i ng i n S W A P , a nd the r e c or d e s t abl i s he d tha tthe p r o g r a m is ap r iv ile g e g r a n te da t th e d is c r e tio n o f th e S h e r if

f’s D e p a rtm e n t. See B d. o f R eg e n ts o

f S ta te C o lls . v . R o th , 4 0 8 U . S. 5 6 4 , 5 6 9 ( 1 9 7 2 ) ( du e p r o c e s s c l a i m cogn i zabl e onl y i f there i s aconst i tut i on al l y prot ec t ed l i berty or property i nt er es t ). T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y g ran t edsu m m ary j u d g m en to n M i l l er’ s F i rst A m endm entre t al i at i on cl ai m because M i l l erdi d n otra i se a tri abl e di sput e thather pl ac em enti n cou nty j ai l i nst ea d o f S W A P di d n otse rve al egi t i m at e c orre ct i on al g o a l. Se e R hodes v . R obi ns on , 4 0 8 F .3 d5 5 9 , 5 6 7 - 6 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) ( s e ttin g f o rth f iv e - f a c to rte s t f

o rF ir s t A m e n d m e n t r e ta lia tio n ) ; P rat t v . R ow land , 65 F . 3d 802, 8 0 6 - 0 7 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 5 ) ( p r is o n e rb e a r s b u r d e n o f p r o v in g ab s e n c e o f

le g itim a te corr ec t i on algo al s f

or al l eged ret al i at ory c on du ct ). T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyg r a n te ds u m m a ryju d g m e n t o n M ille r ’s E ig h th A m endm entcl ai m because M i l l erdi d n otra i se a genui ne di sput e of m at er i alfa ctas t o w hether any of the defendant s w er e del i bera t el y i nd i ff er entt o h erm edi ca l08- 17293 3 n e e d s . See W

i l son v. Sei ter , 50 1 U . S . 29 4, 29 7 (19 91 ) ( i nm at e m ustes t abl i sh that pr i s on of f i c i a l s “ pos s e s s e d as uf

f i c i e nt l yc ul pabl e s t a t e of m i nd” t o i m pl i c a t e the E i gh th A m endm ent ); Ja ckso n v. McIn to sh , 90 F . 3d 33 0, 33 2 (9th C i r. 19 96 ) ( a d if f e r e n c e o f o p in io n ab o u t m e d ic a l c a r e is “in s u f f ic ie n t, a s am a tte ro f

la w , to e s tab lis h d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e ” ) ; s e e a ls o C o ra les v . B e n n e tt , 567 F . 3d 554, 570 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( “ [ T ] he di s tr i c tc ourtha s the author i tyt o de c i de a n i s s ue on sum m ary j ud gm entsua s po nt e, i f the l osi ng party w as on no t i ce t o com e f orw ar d w ith its e v id e n c e .” ) . T h e d i stri ctco u rtd i dn o tab u se i t s d i scret i o n i n d ecl i n i n g t o ex erci se sup p l em en t al j u ri sd i ct i o n o v er M i l l er’ s st at e l aw m al p ract i ce cl ai m s ag ai n st C a lif o rn iaF o r e n s ic M e d ic a l G r o up a f te rd is m is s in g a ll o f

th e f e d e r a l c la im s . See A criv. V a ri a n A sso cs. , 11 4 F . 3d 99 9, 10 01 (9th C i r. 19 97 ). M i l l er’ s rem ai n i n g co n t en t i o n s, i n cl u d i n g al l eg at i o n s reg ard i n g j u d i ci al b i as, bo di l y pri vacy , and h erre qu es tfor the re vers alof her c on vi ct i on s, ar e u n p e r s u a s iv e . W e d o n o t c o n s id e ris s u e s r a is e df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. See Sm i th v. M a rsh , 1 9 4 F .3 d1 0 4 5 , 1 0 5 2 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 9 ) . M i l l e r ’ s pe ndi ng m ot i on t o c orr e c tthe r e c or d i s de ni e d. AF F I RME D.