U.S

.DepartmenT ofTransportOiion Federal Aviation Administration


### June 13 , 2014

Mr. Dennis and Mrs. Danaca Gumaer Parent ofKatelynn Bocanegra 116 Melrose Drive Wheeling, WV 26003 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gumaer: Exemption No. 11004 800 Independence Ave

. . S W

. Washington

. DC 2059i



### Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-02 12

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations ofthe exempt ion, including the date it ends
. The Basis for Our Decision 

### By letter dated March 27 and received March 28, 2014, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalfofKatelynn Bocanegra for an exemption from 

### § 121.3 1 1 

### (b) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, ifgranted, would allow Katelynn to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use ofthat child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft. 

### In Katelynn 's case, since she will be an adult before this exemption expires, an exemption must also be granted from the requirement in 

### § 121.311 

### (b) that the individual be a " child"
. However, the reasons for requesting this exemption do not differ materially from those presented by other petitioners and the reasons stated by the FAA for granting other exemptions also apply to the situation you present.

AFS-14-232-EThe FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary ofthe petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Katelynn. 2

The FAA has issued grants ofexemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grants ofExemption Nos. 7831 and 8264 (copies enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems. The use ofthese restraint systems addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner ofoperations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition would not set any new precedents regarding the use ofrestraint systems by persons with disabilities. Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I ftnd that- • they are similar in all material respects to reliefpreviously requested in the enclosed Grant ofExemption Nos. 7831 and 8264; • the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant ofExemption Nos. 7831 and 8264 also apply to the situation you present; and • a grant ofexemption is in the public interest. 

### Our Decision Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Katelynn Bocanegra an exemption from 

### § 121.311 (b). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Katelynn is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR 

### § 121.311 (b) to the extent necessary to allow her to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use aboard a U.S. aircraft
. All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one ofKatelynn's parents or a caregiver accompanying her. Katelynn Bocanegra may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind her. In addition, Katelynn's parent or caregiver must carry a copy ofthis exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents ofthe exemption at least 48 hours before the date ofeach flight.

### 3 This exemption terminates on June 30,2019, unless sooner superseded or rescinded
. Sincerely, 

# r**f]~ft** John Barbagallo Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service



### Enclosures