alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 198 (Thursday, October 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26130]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-633-000]


Southern Natural Gas; Notice of Tariff Filing

October 5, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 28, 2000, Southern Natural Gas 
Company (Southern), tendered for filing to part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Seventh Revised Volume No. 1, Second Revised Sheet No. 191. Southern 
requests that the Commission approve the revised tariff sheet effective 
November 1, 2000.
    Southern states that the filed tariff sheet is being filed to 
reference the revised reporting requirements in Section 161.3(1)(2) of 
the Commission's Regulations with respect to marketing affiliates.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26130 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach, Appellant, v Maker Water Taxi, Inc., Respondent.

In an action, *inter alia,*to enjoin the defendant’s operation of a “water taxi” service without complying with the licensing requirements of the plaintiffs village code, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), entered July 31, 1989, which converted the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction into a motion for summary judgment and, upon searching the record, granted summary judgment to the defendant dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The complaint sought, *inter alia,*to enjoin the continued operation of the respondent’s business in the absence of a license granted by the appellant. The Supreme Court correctly determined that the respondent is engaged in the operation of a ferry *(see, Mayor of N.Y. v Starin,*106 NY 1; *see also, Alaska S. S. Co. v Federal Mar. Commn.,*399 F2d 623; 36A CJS, Ferries, § 1 [1]). Since the power to grant a license and franchise for the operation of a ferry is vested in Suffolk County and not in the appellant, the court properly dismissed the action *(see, Matter of Ocean Beach Ferry Corp. v Incorporated Vil. of Ocean Beach,*298 NY 30). Harwood, J. P., Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 8.1
 Name of Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationMining Investments Jersey Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold Resources (UK) Limited
    
    United KingdomMorila Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsSociété des Mines de Morila SA
    
    Republic of MaliRandgold Resources (Côte dIvoire) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold Resources (Côte dIvoire) SARL
    
    Côte dIvoireSociété des Mines de Tongon SA
    
    Côte dIvoireRandgold Resources (Mali) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold Resources Mali SARL
    
    Republic of MaliKankou Moussa SARL
    
    Republic of MaliRandgold Resources (Senegal) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold Resources (Somilo) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsSociété des Mines de Loulo SA
    
    Republic of MaliRandgold Resources Tanzania (T) Limited
    
    TanzaniaSeven Bridges Trading 14 (Proprietary) Limited
    
    Republic of South AfricaRandgold Resources (Burkina) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold Resources Burkina Faso SARL
    
    Burkina FasoRandgold Resources T1 Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold Resources T2 Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold
Resources (Jersey) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRandgold Resources (Kibali) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsRAL 1 Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel Islands




---



##### 



Name of Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationKibali (Jersey) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsKibali 2 (Jersey) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsKibali Services Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsMoto Goldmines Australia (Pty) Limited
    
    AustraliaBorder Energy (Ptd) Limited
    
    AustraliaWestmount Resources NL
    
    AustraliaBorder Resources NL
    
    AustraliaMoto Goldmines Limited
    
    Canada0858065 BC Limited
    
    CanadaKibali Goldmines SPRL
    
    Democratic Republic of CongoKibali Cooperatief UA
    
    The NetherlandsBorder Energy East Africa (Pty) Limited
    
    UgandaRandgold
Resources (Gounkoto) Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsMoto
(Jersey) 1 Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel IslandsMoto
(Jersey) 2 Limited
    
    Jersey, Channel Islands
|                                                                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                           
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore (Western) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                                           
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore (Western) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 27    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 15     | 26     | 30     | 14     | 32     | 13     | 2      | 1      | 1      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 5      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Order entered January ~ 2013

In The 

## Court of ppeaI 

## ifth istritt of gexa at aIla

Nos. 05-12-00261-CR 05-12-00738-CR 05-12-00739-CR ERICH DOUGLAS LEE, Appellant



### V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. Fll-41203-H



### ORDER Before the Court is the State’s second motion for extension of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion. The time to file the State’s brief is extended to January 9, 2013. We ORDER the State’s brief tendered on January 9, 

### of the of this order.



### JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               46,012
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       102,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                          5,926
<INVENTORY>                                         111,794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    369,021
<PP&E>                                            2,694,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,327,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2,031,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               655,737
<BONDS>                                           1,901,977
<COMMON>                                                 41
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (724,452)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2,031,785
<SALES>                                           5,260,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5,326,897
<CGS>                                             3,736,076
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3,736,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,415,620
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   67,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     107,329
<INCOME-TAX>                                         42,706
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  64,623
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         64,623
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.15
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 13



                                  CERTIFICATION


           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                        ---------------------------------


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Viatel Holding (Bermuda)
Limited (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacity set forth below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her
knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/S/ Lucy Woods
------------------------------
Name: Lucy Woods
Title: Chief Executive Officer

/S/ Stephen Grist
------------------------------
Name: Stephen Grist
Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: 29 March 2004



A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting each of the signatures appearing in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company in accordance with the
applicable provisions of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and the related rules and regulations.

This written statement accompanies the Annual Report on Form 20-F in which it
appears as an Exhibit pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 or other applicable law, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Philip L. Carter, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 of Rotech Healthcare Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:  March 30, 2005
#### In the Matter of Meyer Greenberg et al., Appellants, v *217Richard Higgins, as Commissioner of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent, and Marie McDonough, Intervenor-Respondent.

Judgment (denominated order), Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered April 23, 1990, which dismissed petitioners’ CPLR article 78 proceedings, seeking to annul a determination by respondent denying petitioners’ application to alter the dwelling space of intervenor tenant, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

The intervenor tenant lives in a small studio apartment. The landlord’s plans to renovate the building included the installation of an elevator shaft that would require 50 square feet of the tenant’s apartment, constituting most of what is now the tenant’s kitchenette area and protruding into the tenant’s living area. Division of Housing and Community Renewal denied the landlord’s application, determining that the proposed extension of the intervenor’s apartment into part of another apartment was not an adequate substitution of dwelling space.

The IAS court properly confirmed respondent’s determination. The record shows that the proposed elevator shaft would occupy virtually all of what is now the tenant’s kitchenette space, as well as a significant part of her single, small living area. The proposed "sliver” extension would completely alter the shape and character of the apartment. Accordingly, the determination has a rational basis *(see, Matter of Vento v Prince,*73 AD2d 884, 885, *affd*51 NY2d 899). Petitioners’ constitutional arguments, which were not presented in the administrative proceedings, are without merit. Petitioners have not shown that the determination deprives them of all reasonable use of their property and thus constitutes an unconstitutional taking of property *(Modjeska Sign Studios v Berle,*43 NY2d 468, *appeal dismissed*439 US 809). Nor were petitioners denied equal protection, since respondent’s determination is rationally related to a legitimate State interest *(Golden v Clark,*76 NY2d 618) of tenant protection.

We have reviewed petitioners’ other arguments, and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.
EXHIBIT 9

Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 1 of 15
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

DELL INC., AND EMC 

CORPORATION,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00473-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00474-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00475-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00476-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00477-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00478-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00479-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00480-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00481-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00482-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00485-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00486-ADA

PATENT CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTIONS

Plaintiff WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos License and Development ( “Plaintiff”)

submits the following preliminary constructions pursuant to the Order Governing Proceedings 

(“OGP”) and the Scheduling Order entered in this case. Plaintiff reserves the right to update, 

supplement, revise, or otherwise modify these preliminary constructions in light of further 

investigation and discovery, including evidence not yet produced by Defendants, or in light of 

modification or supplementation of Defendants’ invalidity contentions. Plaintiff reserves the right 

to argue that the plain and ordinary meaning should apply to any of the claim terms. 

Plaintiff notes that, for certain claim language, Defendants identify entire phrases, without 

specifying which ones of the terms included within those phrases Defendants seeks to have the 

Court construe. Plaintiff can presently only guess as to whether Defendants will seek construction 

of only certain terms included in those phrases.

Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 2 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 3 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 4 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 5 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 6 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 7 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 8 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 9 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 10 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 11 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 12 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 13 of 15
Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 14 of 15
14

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered electronically 

to all counsel of record via email on January 20, 2021.

/s/ Ryan S. Loveless

Ryan S. Loveless

Case 6:20-cv-00480-ADA Document 82-11 Filed 03/17/21 Page 15 of 15
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5608 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain bamboo kitchen devices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. ELLISON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain bamboo 

kitchen devices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN BAMBOO KITCHEN DEVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Forks, spoons, spatulas, 

turners and scrapers designed for use with 

stovetop cookwear (provided for in subheading 

4419.00.40 or 

4419.00.80), the foregoing 

made entirely of bamboo ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5608 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS