alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5345 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5345

 To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-[8-Amino-1-(2-phenyl-quinolin-7-
   yl)-imidazo[1,5-a]pyrazin- 3-yl]-1-methyl-cyclobutanol (OSI-906).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Dold introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-[8-Amino-1-(2-phenyl-quinolin-7-
   yl)-imidazo[1,5-a]pyrazin- 3-yl]-1-methyl-cyclobutanol (OSI-906).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-[8-AMINO-1-(2-PHENYL-QUINOLIN-7-YL)-IMIDAZO[1,5-A]PYRAZIN-
              3-YL]-1-METHYL-CYCLOBUTANOL (OSI-906).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        3-[8-Amino-1-(2-    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          phenyl-quinolin-7-                                                12/31/2015
                          yl)-imidazo[1,5-
                          a]pyrazin-3-yl]-1-
                          methyl-
                          cyclobutanol (OSI-
                          906) (CAS No.
                          867160-71-2)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2933.49.2600)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 13056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04292]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9784-5]

Proposed CERCLA Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement; in re: 
Factory H Superfund Site, Meriden, Connecticut

AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
administrative settlement for recovery of response costs under CERCLA 
Section 122(h)(1) concerning the Factory H Superfund Site in Meriden, 
Connecticut (``Site'') with the following settling party: MidState 
Medical Center, Inc. The settlement requires the settling party to pay 
$100,000 to the Hazardous Substance Superfund. The settlement includes 
a covenant not to sue the settling party pursuant to Section 107(a) of 
CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), relating to the Site. The settlement has 
been approved by the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the 
United States Department of Justice. For thirty (30) days following the 
date of publication of this notice, the Agency will receive written 
comments relating to the settlement. The Agency will consider all 
comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the 
settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which 
indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 
The Agency's response to any comments received will be available for 
public inspection at 5 Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109-
3912.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 28, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Hugh W. Martinez, Senior 
Enforcement Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, 5 
Post Office Square, Suite 100 (OES 04-3), Boston, MA 02109-3912 
(telephone (617) 918-1867) and should refer to the Factory H Superfund 
Site, U.S. EPA Docket No. CERCLA-01-2012-0112.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of the proposed settlement may 
be obtained from Hugh W. Martinez, Senior Enforcement Counsel, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 
100 (OES 04-3), Boston, MA 02109-3912 (telephone no. (617) 918-1867; 
email Martinez.hugh@epa.gov).

    Dated: December 19, 2012.
Nancy Barmakian,
Acting Director, Office of Site Remediation and Restoration.
[FR Doc. 2013-04292 Filed 2-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 50877 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Juan Reynaldo Rodriguez**

**- Morales,** 
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:20

- CR

- 1232

- 1

Before **Southwick, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  * Juan Reynaldo Rodriguez

- Morales appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal re entry after deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). He argues that his sentence exceeded the statutory maximum because the enhanced penalty provisions of § 1326(b) are unconstitutional.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 28, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50877 Document: 00516255785 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2022No. 21

- 50877

2 Rodriguez

- Morales has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition and a letter brief conceding correctly that this issue is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis , 937 F.3d 546, 553

– 54 (5th Cir. 2019) . He st ates that he has raised the issue only to preserve it for possible further review. Because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Rodriguez

- Morales ’s motion is **GRANTED** , and the distric t court’s judgment is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 21-50877 Document: 00516255785 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2022
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5300 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain single yarns of 

viscose rayon. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain single 

yarns of viscose rayon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SINGLE YARNS OF VISCOSE RAYON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.54.04 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain single yarns of viscose rayon) is amended by strik7 ing the date in the effective period column and inserting 

8 ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5300 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Connecticut Department of 

## ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL 

## PROTECTION March 12, 2012 Mr . David Conroy EPA Region 1 Office of EcosystemProtection 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston MA 02109-3912 Re: Clarification ofConnecticut's 2008 PM2 .sAttainment Demonstration Dear Mr . Conroy: By this correspondence, l request the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) accept the enclosed text ofsection 22a-174-22 ofthe Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies (RCSA) as a supplement and clarification to the Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Attainment Demonstration submitted to EPA by the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection' (Department) on 18 November 2008. The Department, while citing RCSAsection 22a-174-22(e)(3) as a post-2002 control measure in Table 4-3 of the 2008 PM2.s Attainment Demonstration, did not include the regulatory text in the Control Measure Appendix (Appendix) . The Appendix should have included all of the post-2002 control measures not previously submitted as revisions to Connecticut's State Implementation Plan (SIP) . Furthermore, all ofthe documentation necessary to satisfy the public participation requirements of 40 CFR 51 with respect to RCSA section 22a-174-22(e)(3) were already included within the Appendix because it included RCSAsection 22a-174-19a, which was adopted in the same public process as RCSA section 22a-174-22(e)(3) . The only document not included in the Appendix is the regulatory text of RCSAsection 22a-174-22(e)(3), which is enclosed herewith. 1 thankyour stafffor bringing this oversight to the Department's attention, and I look forward to this submission assisting EPAwith the reviewof Connecticut's Regional Haze SIP. Sincerely,

Anne Gobin, Chief Bureau ofAir Management cc: Anne Arnold (via electronic mail to arnold anne epamail .epa.aov ) Anne McWilliams (via electronic mail to mcwilliams.annena,epa .m ail .e a.&ov

)

' On July l, 2011, pursuant to Public Act 11-80, the Department of Environmental Protection became the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. 79 ElmStreet " Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www .ct .gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12(b)


           UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY
                             AND AFFILIATE COMPANIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                   (UNAUDITED)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                           Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                                          ----------------------------
Millions, Except Ratios                                                       2001           2000
                                                                          ------------    ------------
<S>                                                                       <C>             <C>
     Earnings:
          Net income ..................................................   $        471    $        478
          Undistributed equity earnings ...............................            (15)             60
                                                                          ------------    ------------
          Total earnings ..............................................            456             538
                                                                          ------------    ------------
     Income taxes .....................................................            279             270
                                                                          ------------    ------------
     Fixed charges:
          Interest expense including amortization of debt discount ....            293             298
          Portion of rentals representing an interest factor ..........             20              84
                                                                          ------------    ------------
          Total fixed charges .........................................            313             382
                                                                          ------------    ------------
     Earnings available for fixed charges .............................   $      1,048    $      1,190
                                                                          ------------    ------------
     Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ...............................            3.3             3.1
                                                                          ------------    ------------
</Table>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Annual Report of DDI International Inc. (DDI) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. Brooke Mitchell, President and Chief Executive Officer of DDI and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Dr. Brooke Mitchell
 Dr. Brooke Mitchell
 Chief Executive Officer
 March 29, 2004
  pAGE - 27 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Annual Report of DDI International Inc. (DDI) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rene Daignault, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of DDI, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Rene Daignault
 Rene Daignault
 Chief Financial Officer
 March 29, 2004
# Obadal, Filler, MacLeod & 

# Klein, P.L.C.
117 NorthHemy Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-2903 Telephone 703.299.0784 Fax703.299.0254 www.potomac-law.com 

# RECEIVED

March 17, 2015 

## H Original Delivered by: Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested Return Receipt Number: 70141200000028716867 70110110000132594782 Federal Aviation Administration 800 IndependenceAvenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite2W1000 RE: Requestfor hearing in FAA case no. 2014CE070023 ToWhom It May Concern: 

## MAR 202015 

## DOCKET

Ourfirm represents the Triumph Group Operations, Inc. d/b/a Triumph Accessory Services in connection with a final notice of proposed civil penalty dated Feb. 27, 2015, in case number2014CE070023. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. 

### §§ 13.16(g)(2)(ii) and 13.16(h) we hereby request a hearing in this matter. Thank you foryour assistance. Sincerely,

6rJ{ arshall S. Filler ' I

**~** Counsel forTriumph Group Operations, Inc. d/b/a Triumph Accessory Services

cc: Mark G. Camacho, Esq. March 17, 2015Case No. 2014CE070023 Triumph Group Operations, Inc. d/b/a Triumph Accessory Services, Wellington, Kansas
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this date placed in the United States mail, by certified mail, return receipt requested, a signed original and one copy ofa requestfor hearing, addressed to: Federal Aviation Administration 800 IndependenceAvenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1 000 AND one copy, by United States mail, return receipt requested, addressed to: Central Region Office ofthe Regional Counsel 901 Locust, Room 506 Kansas City , Missouri 64106-2641 Attn: Mark G. Camacho, Esq.

# o~:;Jio"/ Laura Vlieg - v

# 0 Associate Dated this 17th day of March, 2015.
EXHIBIT 23

Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-24 Filed 07/31/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-24 Filed 07/31/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-24 Filed 07/31/20 Page 3 of 3
#### John M. McGowan, Appellant, v Sears Roebuck & Company, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Hughes, J.), entered April 19, 1990 in Albany County, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on his first cause of action.

Even if it is assumed that plaintiff presented sufficient evidence linking defendant to the application of the pesticide at issue and that such application was negligent, the evidence submitted by defendant in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was sufficient to raise triable issues of fact to warrant denial of the motion *(see, MTB Computer Corp. v Chase Manhattan Bank,*135 AD2d 616; *see also, Krupp v Aetna Life & Cas. Co.,*103 AD2d 252). We have addressed plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them either unpreserved for review or lacking in merit.

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

26
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4961 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4961

        To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Oleo Ginger.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

Mr. Ruppersberger introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Oleo Ginger.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OLEO GINGER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Oleo Ginger (CAS    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          No. 8002-60-6)                                                    12/31/2015
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3301.90.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**OfficerCertification**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SPS on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended Sept. 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (Form 10-Q), each of the undersigned officers ofthe SPS certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’sknowledge:

 

(1)                      The Form 10-Qfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                       The informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of SPS as of the dates andfor the periods expressed in the Form 10-Q.

 
| Date: Oct. 31, 2005                        |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                       |
| /s/ GARY L. GIBSON                         |   |
| Gary L. Gibson                             |
| President and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                                       |
| /s/ BENJAMIN G.S. FOWKE III                |   |
| Benjamin G.S. Fowke III                    |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thisstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to SPS and will beretained by SPS and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit 4**KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants
600 - 128 Fourth Avenue South
Saskatoon SK S7K 1M8
Telephone (306) 934-6200Telefax (306) 934-6233*www.kpmg.ca*


Accountants Consent
 
 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
 
 The Board of Directors
 Claude Resources Inc.
 200,224-4 th Avenue S.
 Saskatoon, SK S7K 5M5
 
 We consent to the use of our report dated March 1, 2004, included in this annual report on Form 40-F of Claude Resources Inc.
 
 
 Saskatoon, Canada
 May 12, 2004
59396 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 194 / Thursday, October 5, 2000 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 00–73]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation

Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of Public

Law 104–164 dated 12 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604–

6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 00–73 with

attached transmittal and policy

justification.

Dated: October 2, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 194 / Thursday, October 5, 2000 / Notices 59397

59398 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 194 / Thursday, October 5, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 194 / Thursday, October 5, 2000 / Notices 59399

[FR Doc. 00–25576 Filed 10–4–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–C

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 00–74]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense

Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of Public

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604–

6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 00–74 with

attached transmittal and policy

justification.

Dated: October 2, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M
#### RODRIGUEZ v. STATE.

No. 25490.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 7, 1951.

No 'attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The offense is murder; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

There are no statement of facts and no bills of exception in the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.