alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

MARIO QUINTANILLA, #03470071 §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § SA-20-CV-563-DAE

§

CAPTAIN MARTIN GONZALES, §

SHERIFF DAVID SOWARD, AND § JURY DEMANDED

OFFICER AMANDA FAZ, §

§

Defendants. §

COUNTY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants Captain Martin Gonzales, Sheriff David Soward and Officer Amanda Faz,

(collectively, the “County Defendants”) file this Motion for Extension of Time to File Supplement 

to Motion for Summary Judgment and state as follows:

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND AND STATUS

The County Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF 

No. 14).

After construing the Motion to Dismiss as a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15), 

the Court ordered the County Defendants to file a supplement addressing Plaintiff’s claim 

construed under the Fourteenth Amendment on or before February 17, 2021 (ECF No. 21).

GROUNDS FOR RELIEF

Last week, Texas experienced a winter storm with widespread power outages, some 

planned and some not. The undersigned counsel were without internet, electricity and water for 

an extended period of time.

Case 5:20-cv-00563-DAE Document 22 Filed 02/23/21 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

The County Defendants request a 14-day extension of time to file a supplement to their 

motion for summary judgment. Under the County Defendants’ requested extension of time, the 

County Defendants’ new deadline would be Wednesday, March 3, 2021.

The County Defendants have not been able to communicate with Plaintiff. Plaintiff is, 

therefore, presumed opposed.

PRAYER

The County Defendants request the Court grant this Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Supplement to Motion for Summary Judgment by extending the deadline until March 3, 2021.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Ben Zinnecker

Larry J. Simmons – Attorney-in-Charge

Texas Bar No. 00789628

Federal I.D. No. 18830

ljsimmons@germer.com

Ben Zinnecker – Of Counsel

Texas Bar No. 24066504

Federal I.D. No. 1269224

bzinnecker@germer-austin.com

GERMER PLLC

America Tower

2929 Allen Parkway, Suite 2900

Houston, TX 77002

(713) 650-1313 – Telephone

(713) 739-7420 – Facsimile

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 23rd day of February, 2021, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing document was forwarded to all known counsel of record pursuant to the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure.

/s/ Ben Zinnecker

Ben Zinnecker

Case 5:20-cv-00563-DAE Document 22 Filed 02/23/21 Page 2 of 2
Final Rule: Deferred Reporting of Certain Data Elements under the GHG Reporting Rule 

Meeting Documentation: Non-Profit Environmental Organizations 4/19/11 

Date EPA Staff Contact 

Information (Name, email, 

phone #) 

Name of Organization (Attach 

list of all attendees names and 

emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, 

reporting requirements, etc.)

Written 

Comments 

Provided? 

Did they also 

submit to Docket? 

Date sent to

EPA-CCD 

4/19/11 Bill Irving, 

irving.bill@epa.gov

Joe Goffman, 

goffman.joseph@epa.gov

Beth Craig, 

craig.beth@epa.gov

Jessica Gordon, 

gordon.jessica@epa.gov

Jennifer Bohman, 

bohman.jennifer@epa.gov

Patricia Embrey, 

embrey.patricia@epa.gov

Gina McCarthy, 

mccarthy.gina@epa.gov

Reid Harvey, 

harvey.reid@epa.gov

NRDC: 

Meleah Geerstma 

Vickie Patton, 

vpatton@edf.org

Sierra Club: 

Craig Segall, 

Craig.Segall@sierraclub.org

Environmental Defense 

Fund: 

Mandy C. Warner 

Peter Zalzal, 

pzalzal@edf.org

Mark MacLeod, 

mmacleod@edf.org

Scope of content and length of 

proposed deferral of reporting of 

inputs to emission equations 

Comments 

previously 

provided and 

submitted to 

Docket 

3/7/11
InThe Matter Of: 

### SERVED: May 17,2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2014-0814 DELTA AIRLINES, INC. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2014S0670010 Respondent ORDERDISMISSING PROCEEDING OnMay 2, 2016, an Order Setting Deadlines for Parties' Informal Case Discussion and Report, and Setting a Pre-Hearing Status Conference was filed. Among otherthings, this Order set a June 3, 2016 deadline for the parties to file ajointreport regarding their informal discussions, and set a Pre-Hearing Status Conference for June 14, 2016. OnMay 16, 2016, the Respondent, DeltaAir Lines, Inc., filed its Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing and Answer, stating that the parties "have reached a settlement inthe

...matter" and "request[ing] that this proceeding be dismissed with prejudice." After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The June 3, 2016 deadline for the parties to file ajointreport is cancelled. 2. The Pre-Hearing Status Conference set for June 14, 2016, is cancelled. 2. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn its Request for Hearing and Answer, andthis proceeding is dismissed withprejudice.

Attachment: Service List Judg 

## u.s.

### DocketNo. FAA-2014-0814 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST- BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001



### Mr. Christopher R. 

### Stevenson Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Southern Region 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 

### Mr. Jon-Peter F. Kelly Respondent's Counsel 

### Assistant General Counsel Delta

### Air Lines, Inc. Department 981 1030 Delta Boulevard Atlanta, GA 30354-1989 TEL: 404-714-5631 FAX: 404-677-2972 Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 ONE COPY

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Defendant State Farm Life Insurance Company’s Notice for Attorney Withdrawal of Pflepsen Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

ANNA GONZALEZ and RONALD K. 

PAGE, on behalf of themselves and all others 

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

Civil Action No.: SA-20-CV-617-FB

NOTICE OF ATTORNEY WITHDRAWAL OF WALDEMAR J. PFLEPSEN, JR.

Defendant State Farm Life Insurance Company submits this notice to effectuate the 

withdrawal of additional named counsel Waldemar J. Pflepsen, Jr., effective June 30, 2021. Mr. 

Plfepsen had been admitted as counsel pro hac vice. [Dkt. 33]. There will be no interruption in the 

representation of State Farm as it is also represented in this case by Wayne B. Mason, Texas Bar No.

13158950, Susan E. Egeland, Texas Bar No. 24040854, and Shaunda A. Patterson-Strachan, admitted 

pro hac vice, to continue as counsel for Defendant. Mr. Pflepsen seeks to withdraw as he is retiring 

from Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP as of this date. 

Dated: June 30, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Susan E. Egeland

Susan E. Egeland

Texas Bar No. 24040854

susan.egeland@faegredrinker.com

FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

1717 Main Street, Suite 5400

Dallas, Texas 75201

Phone: (469) 357-2500

Fax: (469) 327-0860

Case 5:20-cv-00617-FB-ESC Document 85 Filed 06/30/21 Page 1 of 2
Defendant State Farm Life Insurance Company’s Notice for Attorney Withdrawal of Pflepsen Page 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on June 30, 2021, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document 

was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send 

notification of such filing to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service.

/s/ Susan E. Egeland

SUSAN E. EGELAND

Case 5:20-cv-00617-FB-ESC Document 85 Filed 06/30/21 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|Lower 48 States Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Lower 48 States Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 37    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 140    | 273    | 84     | 138    | 407    | 186    | 58     | 250    | 168    | 163   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 178    | 143    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Union Pacific
Railroad Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James R. Young, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ James R. Young
    ------------------------------
    James R. Young
    Chief Financial Officer
    Union Pacific Railroad Company

August 8, 2002
Exhibit 11


                           SONAT INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                           Three Months                  Nine Months
                                                    Ended September 30,           Ended September 30,
                                                    1996          1995          1996           1995
                                                        (In Thousands Except Per-Share Amounts)
<S>                                               <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>


   Primary Earnings Per Share(1)

Net Income                                        $ 48,034      $130,520       $134,198      $185,478
                                                  ========      ========       ========      ========


Common Stock and Common Stock Equivalents:

   Weighted Average Number of Shares
      of Common Stock Outstanding                   86,228        86,273         86,188        86,332
   Common Stock Equivalents Applicable
      to Outstanding Stock Options                   1,529           929          1,297           843
                                                    ------      --------         ------      --------

   Weighted Average Number of Shares
      of Common Stock and Common Stock
      Equivalents Outstanding                       87,757        87,202         87,485        87,175
                                                   =======      ========        =======      ========


Primary Earnings Per Share                           $ .55      $   1.50         $ 1.53      $   2.13
                                                     =====      ========         ======      ========
</TABLE>





















(1)   This  calculation  is submitted in  accordance  with  Regulation  S-K Item
      601(b)(11)  although  not  required by Footnote 2 to  Paragraph  14 of APB
      Opinion  No. 15 because it results in  dilution  of less than 3%. For this
      reason,  the primary  earnings per share  amounts  shown do not agree with
      primary earnings per share shown on the Condensed Consolidated  Statements
      of Income in Part I.
EXHIBIT A

Case 5:20-cv-00642-JKP Document 11-1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 1 of 5
Section 1.01 - Form of Government: 

The municipal government provided by this Charter shall be known as the "Council-Manager" form of 

Government. Pursuant to its provisions and subject only to the limitations imposed by the State 

Constitution, the statutes of this State and by this charter, all powers of the City shall be vested in an 

elective Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City Council," which shall enact local legislation, adopt 

budgets, determine policies and appoint the City Manager, who in turn shall be held responsible to the 

City Council for the execution of the laws and the administration of the government of the City. All power 

of the City shall be exercised in the manner prescribed by this Charter, or if the manner be not prescribed, 

then in such manner as may be prescribed by Ordinance, the State Constitution or the statutes of the 

State. 

Case 5:20-cv-00642-JKP Document 11-1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 2 of 5
Section 2.07 - General Powers and Duties: 

All powers of the City shall be vested in the Council, except as otherwise provided by law or this 

Charter, and the Council shall provide for the exercise thereof and for the performance of all duties and 

obligations imposed on the city by law. 

Case 5:20-cv-00642-JKP Document 11-1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 3 of 5
EXHIBIT B

Case 5:20-cv-00642-JKP Document 11-1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 4 of 5
Section 1.01 - Form of Government: 

The municipal government provided by this Charter shall be known as the "Council-Manager" form of 

Government. Pursuant to its provisions and subject only to the limitations imposed by the State 

Constitution, the statutes of this State and by this charter, all powers of the City shall be vested in an 

elective Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City Council," which shall enact local legislation, adopt 

budgets, determine policies and appoint the City Manager, who in turn shall be held responsible to the 

City Council for the execution of the laws and the administration of the government of the City. All power 

of the City shall be exercised in the manner prescribed by this Charter, or if the manner be not prescribed, 

then in such manner as may be prescribed by Ordinance, the State Constitution or the statutes of the 

State. 

Case 5:20-cv-00642-JKP Document 11-1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT 

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 31-16 Filed 10/02/20 Page 1 of 3
10/1/2020 Flights

https://www.google.com/flights?lite=0#flt=KOA.ACT.2020-10-30*ACT.KOA.2020-11-03;c:USD;e:1;sd:1;t:f 1/2

Nightly prices for 1 guest Nov 1–Nov 3 Search for hotels 

Best depaing ights

Other depaing ights

Hotels in Waco

Date grid Price graph Nearby airports

Travel update

Coronavirus (COVID-19) may impact travel. See travel advice

Additional bag fees and other fees may apply. Sort by:

10:35 PM – 3:21 PM

Ameri... · Operated by Envoy Air as Ameri...

36h 46m

KOA–ACT PHX, SAN, DFW

$529

round trip

+2 3 stops

10:35 PM – 11:28 AM

Ameri... · Operated by Envoy Air as Ameri...

32h 53m

KOA–ACT PHX, DFW

$564

round trip

+2 2 stops

10:35 PM – 3:21 PM

Ameri... · Operated by Envoy Air as Ameri...

11h 46m

KOA–ACT

2 stops

PHX, DFW

$584

round trip

+1

11:15 AM – 11:28 AM

Hawaiian, A... · Operated by Envoy Air as ...

19h 13m

KOA–ACT

2 stops

OGG, DFW

$909

round trip

+1

4:15 PM – 11:28 AM

Hawaiian, A... · Operated by Envoy Air as ...

14h 13m

KOA–ACT

2 stops

HNL, DFW

$914

round trip

+1

11:15 AM – 3:21 PM

Hawaiian, A... · Operated by Envoy Air as ...

23h 6m

KOA–ACT

3 stops

OGG, PHX, DFW

$768

round trip

+1

3:22 PM – 3:21 PM

Alaska, A... · Operated by Envoy Air as A...

18h 59m

KOA–ACT SEA, DFW

$2,647

round trip

+1 2 stops

9:40 PM – 3:21 PM

Alaska, A... · Operated by Envoy Air as A...

12h 41m

KOA–ACT

2 stops

SEA, DFW

$3,479

round trip

+1

105 more flights

Round trip 1 passenger Economy

Kailua-Kona KOA Waco ACT Fri, Oct 30 Tue, Nov 3

Bags Stops Airlines Price Times Connecting airports More

Sign in

Exhibit 13, Page 1

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 31-16 Filed 10/02/20 Page 2 of 3
10/1/2020 Flights

https://www.google.com/flights?lite=0#flt=KOA.ACT.2020-10-30*ACT.KOA.2020-11-03;c:USD;e:1;sd:1;t:f 2/2

Hilton Waco

4.4 (900)

Hotel Indigo

W Bl 4.5 (765)

Holiday Inn

E &S i 4.4 (529)

Explore more destinations from Kailua-Kona

$94 $123 $106

Flights Language · English Country · United States Currency · USD

Find the cheapest and best flight for you.

About Google Privacy & Terms Help Center and Consumer Information

Displayed currencies may differ from the currencies used to purchase flights. Learn more.

Sign in

Exhibit 13, Page 2

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 31-16 Filed 10/02/20 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6145

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TOY BURTRON MADDEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CR-94-440-JFM)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Toy Burtron Madden, Appellant Pro Se. Joyce Kallam McDonald, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Toy Burtron Madden appeals the district court's order denying

his challenge to the district court's original criminal jurisdiction and venue. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Jurisdiction was

proper under 18 U.S.C. § 3231 (1994), and venue was proper under 18

U.S.C. § 3237 (1994), and Fed. R. Crim. P. 18. We deny Madden's motion to vacate his sentence with immediate release from custody. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5005 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6-Dichloroaniline. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6- 

Dichloroaniline. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,6-DICHLOROANILINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.17 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2,6-Dichloroaniline) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5005 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania :

:

v. : No. 1695 C.D. 2018

:

Gregoreos Giaffes, :

Appellant :

O R D E R

NOW, March 3, 2020, having considered Appellant’s application for 

reargument, the application is denied.

 

 MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

 President Judge
#### Hollis M. Hite, Respondent, v James N. Hite et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the trial court erred in granting plaintiff summary judgment. We agree. Accepting, as we must for the purposes of this motion, the nonmoving party’s evidence as true *(see, Hourigan v McGarry,*106 AD2d 845), summary judgment must be denied because there is at least arguably an issue of fact regarding the existence of the partnership *(see, Missan v Schoenfeld,*95 AD2d 198). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, J.—dissolution of partnership.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM    We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of The Standard Register Company for the period ended July 4, 2010, as indicated in our report dated August 2, 2010; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements File No.'s 333-02683, 333-05231, 333-15851, 333-43055, 333-51189, 333-51181, 333-57779, 333-84483 and 333-86492.  We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.    /S/BATTELLE & BATTELLE LLP  Dayton, Ohio August 2, 2010
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG   Document 35-40   Filed 01/15/21   Page 1 of 1