alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-1357

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Rene Ramos Galvan, also known as * District of Minnesota. Victor Reyes, also known as Victor * Galvan Reyes, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 9, 2002 Filed: August 14, 2002

___________ Before BOWMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Rene Ramos Galvan appeals from the sentence imposed by the District Court 1 following his guilty plea to a drug charge. Galvan’s counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Galvan has filed a supplemental brief, asserting that his counsel was ineffective, that the District Court should not have held the plea hearing on September 11, 2001, because the-2- hearing resulted in a “coerced confession” and the district judge’s “actions and statements would show his mind was on the Twin Towers and not [Galvan’s] due process.” We affirm. As to the issue raised by counsel, we conclude that the District Court properly sentenced Galvan in accordance with the unobjected-to drug quantities set forth in the presentence report. See United States v. Beatty , 9 F.3d 686, 690 (8th Cir. 1993). Galvan’s pro se arguments are also unavailing. His challenge to his counsel’s effectiveness should be brought in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, if at all. SeeUnited States v. Clayton , 210 F.3d 841, 845 n.4 (8th Cir. 2000). Further, he has not explained how he was prejudiced from the Court’s unobjected-to decision to proceed with the September 11, 2001 plea hearing, and the hearing transcript does not support his assertion that the Court coerced his guilty plea or otherwise violated his rights. We have reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

     The undersigned  officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage  Securities Corp., a
Delaware  corporation (the "Company")  hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE  SECURITIES
CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-MS4, as follows:

     1. I am a duly appointed and qualified First Vice President of the Company.

     2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

     3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate
on behalf of the Company.

     4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

     5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 29, 2005.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         First Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6486

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

REGGIE EUGENE HICKS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District

Judge. (CR-99-316, CA-01-235)

Submitted: June 4, 2002 Decided: June 21, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reggie Eugene Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant

United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Reggie Eugene Hicks seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the

reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hicks, Nos.

CR-99-316, CA-01-235 (E.D. Va. Jan. 11, 2002). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 25, 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00305

- CV

JAYPAL C. REDDY A/K/ A JAIPAL C. REDDY AN D APARNA CHERUKUPALLI , Appellant s

V.

NARASIMHA REDDY CHAN DAMURI , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 1 Jefferson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 125718

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed December 17 , 201 4 . No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant s did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On April 17 , 2015, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days,2 appellant s p aid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Appellant s have not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CUR IAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, McCally, and Donovan
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-158494, 333-154579 and
333-148483 on Form S-3, Registration Statement Nos. 333-171748, 333-169622, and 333-165388 on Form S-1, and
Registration Statement No. 333-128094 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 24, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Advanced Life
Sciences Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on the consolidated financial statements and includes explanatory paragraphs referring to uncertainty
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and that the Company is in the development stage) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2010.

/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
March 24, 2011

79

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5472 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5472

 To suspend temporarily the duty on preformed iodide pellets or powder 
 composed of iodides of dysprosium, thallium sodium, holmium, thulium 
                              and calcium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on preformed iodide pellets or powder 
 composed of iodides of dysprosium, thallium sodium, holmium, thulium 
                              and calcium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREFORMED IODIDE PELLETS OR POWDER COMPOSED OF IODIDES OF 
              DYSPROSIUM, THALLIUM SODIUM, HOLMIUM, THULIUM AND 
              CALCIUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Preformed iodide    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          pellets or powder                                                 12/31/2015
                          composed of
                          iodides of
                          dysprosium,
                          thallium sodium,
                          holmium, thulium
                          and calcium (CAS
                          Nos. 7681-82-5,
                          7790-30-9, 15474-
                          63-2, 13813-41-7,
                          13813-43-9, and
                          10102-68-8)
                          (provided for in
                          sub-heading
                          2827.60.51)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00454-ADA

ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY DISCOVERY HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

DISCOVERY HEARING by Zoomoom on Tuesday, September 07, 2021 at 03:30 PM.

set

IT 2nd day of September, 2021.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 84 Filed 09/02/21 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5388 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5388

     To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Solvent Yellow 131.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Ms. Fudge introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Solvent Yellow 131.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOLVENT YELLOW 131.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Solvent Yellow 131  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 52821-24-                                                12/31/2015
                          6) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          3204.19.25)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

MEMORANDUM

Subject: Meeting Minutes from Borate Taskforce Meeting on Use Information

To: Boric Acid and Sodium Borate Salts Registration Review Docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0306

Date: April 22, 2015 

Contents:

Meeting Minutes

Sign-in Sheet of Meeting Attendees

Meeting Minutes:

The Taskforce briefed the Boric Acid and Sodium Borate Salts Registration Review Team through previously provided 

use information of their member’s products and provided a presentation on wood preservative uses. The Taskforce 

agreed to provide EPA updated use information, additional label clarification for Taskforce member’s products, and the 

maximum application rates being supported by Taskforce members. The Taskforce is made up of the following boric 

acid and sodium borate salt registrants: Koppers Performance Chemicals (PKA Osmose Inc.), Pro-Serve, Quality 

Borate/National Boraxx, Drexel Chemical Co., Makhteshim Agan of North America, Searles Valley Mineral, Nisus 

Corp., American Borate Co., U.S. Borax Inc., Societá Chimica Larderello SpA, and Genics Inc. Boric acid and sodium 

borate salts are used as acaricides, algaecides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, miticides, and wood preservatives. The 

boric acid and sodium borate salts registration review preliminary risk assessments are scheduled to publish for public 

comment in late 2015.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6486

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus REGGIE EUGENE HICKS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-99-316, CA-01-235) Submitted: June 4, 2002 Decided: June 21, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reggie Eugene Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Reggie Eugene Hicks seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hicks , Nos. CR-99-316, CA-01-235 (E.D. Va. Jan. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00487-CR

KODY AUSTIN LOTT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 30th District Court

Wichita County (58029-A)

and

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1

Tarrant County (C009529)

November 7, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgments. It is ordered that the judgments

of the trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
Exhibit 31.2

                            ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

     I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates,
News America Debenture-Backed Series 2002-9 Trust (the "Trust"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing
          reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in respect of
          periods included in the year covered by this annual report of the
          Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
          report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
          provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
          under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in
          such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee
          under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my
          knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has
          fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

Date: March 21, 2007



     /s/ DAVID J. KOLIBACHUK
-----------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
EXHIBIT 1

Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 29-17 Filed 10/02/20 Page 1 of 3
10/1/2020 Flights

https://www.google.com/flights?lite=0#flt=KOA.AUS.2020-10-30*AUS.KOA.2020-11-03;c:USD;e:1;sd:1;t:f 1/2

Best depaing ights

Other depaing ights

Date grid Price graph Nearby airports

Travel update

Coronavirus (COVID-19) may impact travel. See travel advice

Additional bag fees and other fees may apply. Sort by:

11:15 PM – 9:04 PM

United

16h 49m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

SFO, IAH

 $452

round trip

+1

11:15 PM – 2:25 PM

United

10h 10m

KOA–AUS

1 stop

1h 37m SFO

 $492

round trip

+1

10:35 PM – 2:00 PM

American

10h 25m

KOA–AUS

1 stop

2h 11m PHX

$562

round trip

+1

Prices are currently typical for your trip. Details

9:15 AM – 11:17 AM

Uni... · Operated by Mesa Airlines DBA Un...

21h 2m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

SFO, IAH

 $452

round trip

+1

9:15 AM – 2:25 PM

United

24h 10m

KOA–AUS 15h 36m SFO

 $452

round trip

+1 1 stop

9:50 PM – 1:24 PM

Unit... · Operated by Skywest DBA United ...

10h 34m

KOA–AUS

1 stop

1h 35m DEN

 $522

round trip

+1

10:35 PM – 5:34 PM

A... · Operated by Skywest Airlines as A...

13h 59m

KOA–AUS

3 stops

PHX, ABQ, DFW

$543

round trip

+1

3:22 PM – 1:20 PM

Alaska

16h 58m

KOA–AUS 7h 3m SEA

$631

round trip

+1 1 stop

4:15 PM – 11:34 AM

Hawaiian, American

14h 19m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

HNL, DFW

$671

round trip

+1

Round trip 1 passenger Economy

Kailua-Kona KOA Austin AUS Fri, Oct 30 Tue, Nov 3

Bags Stops Airlines Price Times Connecting airports More

Sign in

Exhibit 14, Page 1

Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 29-17 Filed 10/02/20 Page 2 of 3
10/1/2020 Flights

https://www.google.com/flights?lite=0#flt=KOA.AUS.2020-10-30*AUS.KOA.2020-11-03;c:USD;e:1;sd:1;t:f 2/2

Nightly prices for 1 guest Oct 31–Nov 3 Search for hotels 

Hotels in Austin

JW Marriott

Austin

4.6 (5485)

Hilton Austin

4.4 (4128)

Fairmont Austin

4.5 (3039)

Explore more destinations from Kailua-Kona

7:03 PM – 2:00 PM

Hawaiian, American

13h 57m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

HNL, PHX

$671

round trip

+1

7:03 PM – 2:00 PM

Hawaiian, American

13h 57m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

HNL, PHX

$671

round trip

+1

11:15 PM – 2:59 PM

United, A... · Operated by Horizon Air as A...

10h 44m

KOA–AUS

1 stop

2h 12m SFO

$827

round trip

+1

7:20 PM – 2:30 PM

Hawaiian, Delta

14h 10m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

HNL, LAX

$1,065

round trip

+1

9:40 PM – 3:43 PM

Alaska, Amer... · Operated by American A...

13h 3m

KOA–AUS

2 stops

SEA, DFW

$1,577

round trip

+1

49 more flights

$155 $131 $150

Flights Language · English Country · United States Currency · USD

Find the cheapest and best flight for you.

About Google Privacy & Terms Help Center and Consumer Information

Displayed currencies may differ from the currencies used to purchase flights. Learn more.

7 03 PM 2 00 PM 13h 57 2 $671 +1 7 03 PM 2 00 PM 13h 57 2 $671 +1

Sign in

Exhibit 14, Page 2

Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 29-17 Filed 10/02/20 Page 3 of 3
|                                                                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                                  
|Louisiana (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                                  
|Louisiana (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5      | 11     | 6      | 3     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 2      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023