alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Emissions Modeling Data Files for Final 2017-2025 Light Duty Vehicle GHG Rule

FROM: Margaret Zawacki

Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality

Rich Mason

Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group, Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799-DRAFT-XXXXX

DATE: August 6, 2012

The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit emissions modeling data files which were used 

to prepare air quality modeling inventories for the final 2017-2025 light duty vehicle greenhouse 

gas rule. The emissions modeling analyses are discussed in the Emissions Inventory for Air 

Quality Modeling Technical Support Document: 2017-2025 Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas 

Final Rule. The air quality modeling analysis results are able to be replicated by using the data 

files provided here and the information in the Air Quality Modeling Technical Support 

Document: 2017-2025 Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards Final Rule. 

Following is a brief description of the information contained on the enclosed DVD.

The files contain county level delimited summaries for criteria pollutants and select hazardous air 

pollutants (e.g. benzene, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, acrolein, 1,3-butadiene, ethanol, 

naphthalene) by emissions modeling sector for the scenarios listed below. Summaries are 

included by month using average day emissions and separately with annual totals. 

1) 2005 base

2) 2030 Reference

3) 2030 Control

The files contained on the enclosed disc are “ldghg_database_description final.docx” and “LD 

GHG county-sector-month reports with ctl2 02jul2012.accdb”.

Attachments

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Jolley, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J.—burglary, second degree.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
----

Action brought on 21 March 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland

(Case C-154/06)

(2006/C 131/59)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and K. Nyberg, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Finland

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for implementation of the directive expired on 13 August 2004.

----

(1)OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 106.

----
Last Name First Name Company

Anderson Michael TRC Environmental Corporation Beane Samuel Wentworth Institute of Technology Biton Leiran NESCAUM Bolduc Mark UCONN- Office of Environmental Policy Bourdon Judy AECOM Bravo Sandra CB&I Breiter-Wu Andres Wentworth Institute of Technology Calabrese Ruthanne Northeast Utilities DelRossi Jennifer Trinity Consultants Deva Villareal Shanta Wentworth Institute of Technol ogy Devita Philip Harris Miller Miller & Hanson, Inc. do Canto Marco Wentworth Institute of Technology Dudziak Norman E and I Services, LLC Ernst David ICF International Fagan Tim Business & Legal Resources (BLR) Guveyan Steven CT Petroleum Council/ API Hartman Lisa Genzyme Corporation, a Sanofi Company Hoffnagle Gale TRC Environmental Corporation Jones Jennifer Genzyme Corporation, a Sanofi Company Jones Matthew TRC Environmental Corporation Jones Nicholas Wentworth Institute of Technology Krochko David Woodard & Curran, Inc. Lemus Samantha Wentworth Institute of Technology Lipka George Tetra Tech Matheson Ryan Wentworth Institute of Technology McCarthy Cole Wentworth Institute of Technology Mitra Sugato GZA GeoEnvironmnetal, Inc. Murphy Paul CAAssociates Nelson Brandon Wentworth Institute of Technology Rivera Tanya Wentworth Institute of Technology Romanski James Yale University- EH&S Scarchilli David OccuHealth, Inc. Scelfo Thomas Woodard & Curran, Inc. Schenck Paula UCONN Health Center Silman Ruth Nixon Peabody LLP Simcox Alison US EPA Region 1 Skelly Brian GEI Consultants, Inc. Stewardson Ian Wentworth Institute of Technology Tino Vinny Epsilon Associates, Inc, Tran Kristen DSG Solutions LLC Vaughan Ardis Shawmut Environmental Wallace Marc Tech Environmnetal, Inc.Wong Shutsu US EPA Region 1 Skoglund Chris NH DES Cash David MassDEP Johnson Eric ISO- NE Sinclair Jaimeson CTDEEP Evanich Christopher S&C Electric Company Douglas Ellen Umass Boston Stratton Jessie CTDEEP Cool Ellen Levitan Associates Brydges Andrew Connecticut Energy Finance Investment Authority Hanson Elizabeth MassDEP Reitsma Jan Special Adviser for Policy and Legislative Affairs, Office of Governor Lincoln Chafee Speakers
5560 Overland Avenue  Suite 210  San Diego, California 92123  T 858 565 7285  F 858 565 7290  www.LoweEnterprises.com

March 21, 2012 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Alaska Airlines’ application for SAN-DCA, Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029. 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

Lowe Enterprises fully supports the application of Alaska Airlines for air service between San 

Diego and Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA). San Diego is the largest region without 

direct service to DCA. Additionally, due to the profound community of interest between San 

Diego and the nation’s capital, the region generates the largest passenger market demand 

without nonstop service to the convenient and close-in airport serving our nation’s capitol. 

San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington coupled with the fact that San Diego to Dulles 

average airfares are the highest of west coast cities, should qualify for the limited slots available 

for this flight. The high airfare is exacerbated when factoring in taxi fares from Dulles to 

Washington’s city center that average about $60 each way. This means travelers between 

Washington’s city center and San Diego via Dulles can pay on average close to $400 one-way. 

There are also countless other San Diego-based and Washington-based businesses that are 

engaged in health science, telecommunications, and national defense that need quick and 

convenient access to Reagan National Airport. Lowe Enterprises has an immediate need for 

additional nonstop air service to our nation’s capital. Alaska Airlines service would add a 

needed nonstop option to a primary gateway to Washington, DC. Lowe Enterprises joins with 

the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, the San Diego Regional Economic 

Development Corporation, the World Trade Center San Diego, and the San Diego Regional 

Chamber of Commerce in support of Alaska Airlines’ application for San Diego – Washington 

Reagan National slots. 

We thank the Department of Transportation for the opportunity to comment on the above 

referenced docket and we hope to hear of a favorable review of Alaska Airlines’ San Diego – DCA 

proposal soon. 

Sincerely, 

Lowe Enterprises Real Estate Group 

Michael McNerney 

Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Sean P. McGrath

Sean P. McGrathTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    March 30, 2011
EXHIBIT 23



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings, Inc.
Oak Ridge, Tennessee

As independent public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the use of our report,
dated January 31, 2003, related to the consolidated  balance sheets of Tennessee
Valley Financial Holdings, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2002 and 2001,
and the related  consolidated  statements of earnings,  changes in stockholders'
equity,  cash  flows and  comprehensive  income in the Form  10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2002, for Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings, Inc.

                                          /s/ Pugh & Company, P.C.

                                          Pugh & Company, P.C.
                                          Certified Public Accountants
                                          Knoxville, Tennessee
March 26, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5145 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5145

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Reactive Black 31.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Kissell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Reactive Black 31.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REACTIVE BLACK 31.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Reactive Black 31   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 85585-91-                                                12/31/2015
                          7) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          3204.16.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.19.2


                                   Amendment
              to the Contract of Employment of 30.08.1996 between

                                 PAREXEL GmbH
               Independent Pharmaceutical Research Organization
                           Klinikum Westend, Haus 18
                              Spandauer Damm 130
                                D-14050 Berlin

   represented by the sole shareholder PAREXEL Unternehmensbeteiligung GmbH,
represented by the Managing Directors Joe von Rickenbach and Prof. Dr. Werner M.
                                   Herrmann
                  -hereinafter referred to as the "Company"-

                                      and

                     Dr. Ulf Schneider, born on 02.06.1957
                     BrunckernerstraBe 49, D-12247 Berlin

             -hereinafter referred to as the "Managing Director"-

  The following amendments come into operation with effect from 01 July 1999:

                                     (S) 4
                                 Remuneration

(1) Basic salary

With effect from 01.07.1999 the Managing Director will receive a fixed annual
salary of DM 323.812.--, payable in twelve equal installments, one at the end
of each month, plus the employer's contributions (statutory social security
pension insurance, health insurance, unemployment insurance and care insurance).
Here the different locations will retain the aforementioned percentage split for
the salary payments.

Additionally, the Managing Directors will receive a monthly contribution of 99
DM towards the expenses of his children's childcare institution (after
presenting a proof of payment). The MD is obliged to inform the company, with
sufficient notice, of any changes to the cost of childcare. In the case of a
decrease in costs or cessation, this reduction will be taken into account in the
yearly salary.

The other provisions of the contract remain unchanged.

Berlin, 22.11.1999

PARAEXEL Unternehmensbeteiligung GmbH                    Managing Director

<PAGE>

                 Amendming contract page 2/2 Dr. U. Schneider

Prof. Dr. W. M. Herrmann                         Dr. U. Schneider
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ESTATE OF CLYDE L. HARRIGER

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 16

- 1708

ALICE JEAN ROGERS HARRIGER

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed March 24, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Vo lusia County

, Karen Adams Foxman , Judge.

Allison J. McC abe and Susanne D.
McCabe, of McCabe Law Firm , Port Orange, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The estate of Clyde L. Harriger (“Former Husband”) appeals the Final Judgment

of Dissolution of Marriage regarding Former Husband and Alice Jean Rogers Harriger

(“Former Wife”). Former Husband raises three issues on appeal, contending that the trial

court erred in: 1) considering the subject of nonmarital property despite Former Wife’s

failure to raise it in her pleadings; 2) determining that Former Wife possessed nonmarital

property and categorizing two Bank of America accounts as nonmarital; and 3) failing to2 make factual findings re garding six Wells Fargo accounts. We affirm as to the first two

issues without further discussion.

As to the third issue, we reverse and remand for the trial court to make factual

findings regarding the Wells Fargo bank accounts. See Winney v. Winney , 9 79 So. 2d

396, 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“ A trial court’s failure to make adequate factual findings in

a final judgment of dissolution of marriage is typically reversible error because, in most

circumstances, this failure precludes meaningful appellate revi ew.”). Specifically, the trial

court is directed on remand to make written findings stating whether these accounts are

marital or nonmarital property.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA, TORPY and BERGER, JJ., concur.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5382 

To suspend temporarily the duty on poly(vinyl alcohol), whether or not 

containing unhydrolyzed acetate groups. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on poly(vinyl alcohol), 

whether or not containing unhydrolyzed acetate groups. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLY(VINYL ALCOHOL), WHETHER OR NOT 

4 CONTAINING UNHYDROLYZED ACETATE 

5 GROUPS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5382 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Poly(vinyl alcohol), whether or not containing 

unhydrolyzed acetate 

groups (CAS No. 9002– 

89–5) (provided for in subheading 3905.30.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
S 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

SARA SHANNON and ROSA PALACIOS § 

and DEBRA CORBELLO, Individually § 

and on behalf of all others similarly § 

situated, § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § § THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION, § § Defendant. 

2026MM 2g M 2:12 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1 :20-cv-00448-LY 

ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO ANSWER 

Pending before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to 

Answer Plaintiffs' Class Action Complaint. After considering the Motion, the attached 

Declarations, and the relevant arguments and information contained therein, the Court finds that 

there is good cause for the Motion and the requested extension. The Court therefore GRANTS 

Defendant's Motion and ORDERS that Defendant shall file its response to Plaintiffs' Class 

Action Complaint on or before June 26, 2020. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 2020. 

ted Distrt Judge 

Case 1:20-cv-00448-LY Document 11 Filed 05/28/20 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|New Mexico Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|New Mexico Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 11     | 8     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 18     | 13     | 9      | 8      | 15     | 10     | 12     | 11     | 25     | 13    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 17     | 22     | 33     | 28     | 20     | 30     | 51     | 35     | 54     | 65    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 31     | 121    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel Meeting for Ecological Studies: Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name and Committee Code: Advisory Panel for Ecological Studies 
(#1751).
    Date and Time: October 12, 2000, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. thru 
October 13, 2000, 8:00 a.m.-Adjourn.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
373, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Penelope Firth, Program Officer or Dr. Carol 
Johnston, Program Officer, Ecological Studies, Room 640N, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 
22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8481.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals to the National Science Foundation (NSF) for 
financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted in response 
to the Ecological Studies Ecosystem Studies Program Solicitation 
(99-2).
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4), and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 3, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25823 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 1

Bank of America

Bank of America Mortgage

101 E. Main Street, Suite 400

P.O.Box 35140

Louisville, Kentucky 40232 5140

 

Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance

with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards

March 7, 2003

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, BA Mortgage LLC, and the Mortgage

division of Bank of America, N.A. (collectively, the "Company"), which together comprise an operating division of Bank of America, N.A., has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's            Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP").
As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and              omissions policy in the amounts of $400,000,000 and $475,000,000 respectively.

 
***Kevin M. Shannon		***H. Randall Chestnut
Kevin M. Shannon				H. Randall Chestnut

President					Senior Vice President

Consumer Real Estate				Bank of America, N.A.

Bank of America, N.A.
***David H. Rupp				***Gary K. Bettin
David H. Rupp					Gary K. Bettin

Senior Vice President				Senior Vice President and

Bank of America, N.A.				National Servicing Executive

						Bank of America, N.A.	
***J. Mark Hanson                          

J. Mark Hanson

Senior Vice President

Bank of America, N.A.

 

 

 

 

 

USA***************