August 18, 2015

Exemption No. 12492

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–0520

Mr. Kaz Norvaisas

President

Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc.

3850 Norteast 21 Avenue Suite 10

Lighthouse Point, FL 33064

Dear Mr. Norvaisas:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

By letter dated February 18, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc. (hereinafter petitioner or operator) 

for an exemption. The exemption would allow the petitioner to operate an unmanned aircraft 

system (UAS) to conduct aerial videography and cinematography.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and 

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the DJI Spreading Wings S800 and DJI Phantom 2.
2

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products 

and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates. In accordance with the statutory criteria 

provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112−95 in reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in 

consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the 

aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft 

meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the requested relief from 

14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness 

Certificates, and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is 

not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection1. The FAA has issued grants of 

exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. 

In Grants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 

11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see

Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. 

FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned

aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or 

crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in 

addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled 

by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

• The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and 

• A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, 

delegated to me by the Administrator, Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc.is granted 

an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 

91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 

 

1 Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UA. 

Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF 

analysis, etc.), chemical measurement (particulate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by 

instruments aboard the UA.
3

91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform 

aerial data collection. This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed 

below.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc.is hereafter referred to 

as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI S800 and DJI 

Phantom 2 when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed 

operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this 

exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are 

not permitted. 

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The 

exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine 

compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at 

airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the 

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or 

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within 

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used 

to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS 

capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; 

electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC 

must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the 

duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties 

required of the VO.
4

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its 

operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of 

exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating 

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the 

Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, 

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. 

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating 

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the 

operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised 

documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The 

operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension 

or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update 

or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then 

the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s 

UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding 

updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics, e.g., replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo 

a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. 

Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at 

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such 

a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is 

in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the 

UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre-flight inspection must account for all 

potential discrepancies, e.g., inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the 

inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is 

prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the 

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and 

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer 

safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, 

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a 
5

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a 

state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal 

Government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the 

ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be 

operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC 

qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs 

(training, proficiency, and experience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to 

safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated 

under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, 

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During 

training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for 

flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA 

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights 

under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as 

denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not 

denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current 

FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption 

holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available 

to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a 

pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the 

intended operation and to operate after that for at least 5 minutes or with the reserve 

power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.
6

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All 

operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO-issued COA. The 

exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct 

operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification 

(N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must 

be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and 

any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the 

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. 

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement 

official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and 

activities at all times. 

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons 

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure 

that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises 

where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of 

the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety 

of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of 

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not 

present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered 

nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported 
7

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions 

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and 

television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) 

as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this 

exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards 

District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3-day 

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities 

must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted 

under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of 

the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners 

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those 

who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, 

town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes 

essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons 

consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the 

exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS 

operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, 

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.
8

This exemption terminates on August 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
Kaz Norvaisas,President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc. 

Section 333 Exemption Petition · 

Feb 18, 2015 

U.S. Department of 

Transportation Docket 

Management System 1200 

New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

1>/'"-:!0 -

,lv~kterans Helping Veterans 

,Foundation, Inc. 

~iis~elorg 

Kaz & Camille Norvaisas 

3850 NE 21 Ave. #10 

,Lighthouse Point 

Florida 33064 

561-325-8407 FL 

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal 

Aviation Regulations from 14 

C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R Part 21; 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a)&(b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b) (2); 

91.103(b); 91.109; 119.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a)&(b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a) (1); 

91.409(a) (2); 91.417(a)&(b) 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

I, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation,lnc.,am 

writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the 

procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. 11, to request that the Veterans Helping 

Veterans Foundation,lnc., an owner and operator of small unmanned aircraft, 

be exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations ("FARs") listed below so that 

I, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc., may 

operate a small ultra light weight unmanned aircraft system (''UAS") commercially 

in airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"). 

As described herein I, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans 

Foundation, Inc., am a FAA licensed Pilot with over 20 years experence in 

owning and operation private aircraft and also flying hobby helicopters for 

recreational purposes. I have a hobby grade quad-copter• UAS equipped with a 

video and still camera for aerial videography and cinematography to enhance 

academic community awareness for non profit organizations in the South Florida 

area, and to produce revenue to further the charitable goals of the Veterans 

Helping Veterans Foundation Inc. by producing real estate listing videos; 

following exemption and approval by the FAA. 

I have flown small RC electric helicopters for over six (6) years without incident. 

Page 1 
Kaz Norvaisas,President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc. 

Section 333 Exemption Petition 

Committed to safety with each flight. The Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, 

Inc.'s, exemption request would permit operation of ultra light weight, unmanned 

(piloted by remote control) and comparatively inexpensive UAS(s) in tightly 

controlled and limited airspace.sPredetermined in areas away from general 

public, airports, heliports and vehicular traffic for community videos, and within 

property boundaries for individual homeowner real estate listing videos/photos. 

Currently, similar lightweight, remote controlled UAS's are legally operated by 

unmonitored amateur hobbyists with no safety plan or controls in place to prevent 

catastrophe. I, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans 

Foundation, Inc., have personally instilled safety protocols and controls4 to avoid 

and prevent public hazard, as well as manned aircraft hazards/catastrophe. This 

will act to further safety protocols exclusive to lightweight UAS's specific to real 

estate video and photography usage as I, Kaz Norvaisas will record flight data 

and other information gained through permitted flight operations to share with the 

FAA through any required FAA reports to assist with future protocol and safety 

regulation. 

Granting the Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc.'s, request comports 

with the Secretary of Transportation's (FAA Administrator's) responsibilities and 

authority to not only integrate UAS's into the national airspace system, but to 

" ... establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems [UAS's] 

in the national airspace system" under Section 333(c) of the Reform Act specific 

to the use of UAS's for real estate/Realtor purposes. Further I, Kaz Norvaisas, 

President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc., will conduct my 

operations in compliance with the protocols described herein or as otherwise 

established by the FAA. 

For the reasons stated below I, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping 

Veterans Foundation, Inc., respectfully request the grant of an exemption 

allowing me to operate ultra light weight, remote controlled UAS's for academic 

community awareness to benefit local non profit organizationas and to enhance 

real estate listing videos for homeowners who cannot afford expensive manned 

aircraft for the same purpose. Both of which will promote local economic growth 

through increased employment and increased tax base. Both with public safety in 

mind by keeping heavier manned aircraft containing combustible fuel that that 

poses potential public hazard. 

Page 2 
Kaz Norvaisas,President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc. 

Section 333 Exemption Petition 

I. Contact Information: 

Kaz Norvaisas, Pilot SEL, President 

Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc. 

501(c)3 Non Profit EIN 452189-050 

18Vets.Org VeteransFoundationFL@Gmail.com 

3850 NE 21 Ave. Ste 10 

Lighthouse Point FL 33064 

561-235-8407 

II. The Specific Sections of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations 

FromWhich Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans 

Foundation, Inc. Requests Exemption are: 

14 CFR 21;14 C.F.R. 45.23(b);14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b);14 C.F.R. 91, et 

seq.;14 CFR 407 (a) (1);14 CFR 409 (a) (2); and, 14 CFR 417 (a) & (b). 

II. The Extent of relief Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping 

Veterans Foundation, Inc. seeks and the Reason He Seeks SuchRelief: 

I, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc., 

submit this application in accordance with the Reform Act, 112 P.L. 95 §§ 331-

334, seeking relief from any currently applicable FARs operating to prevent me, 

Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc., 

contemplated commercial cinematic, academic and other flight operations within 

the national airspace system. The Reform Act in Section 332 provides for such 

integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into our national airspace system 

as it is in the public's interest to do so. My, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans 

Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc.'s, ultra light weight UAS meets the definition of 

"small unmanned aircraft" as defined in Section 331 and therefore the integration 

of my ultra light weight UAS is expressly contemplated by the Reform Act. I 

would like to operate my ultra light weight UAS prior to the time period by which 

the Reform Act requires the FAA to promulgate rules governing such craft. 

Thereby, providing direct experience and valuable information for formal 

regulation that can be administered uniformly to all real estate related UAS aerial 

video and photography. The Reform Act guides the Secretary in determining the 

types of UAS's that may operate safely in our national airspace system. 

Considerations include: The weight, size, speed and overall capabilities of the 

UAS's; Whether the UAS will be operated near airports or heavily populated 

areas; and, Whether the UAS will be operated by line of sight. 112 P.L. 95 § 333 

(a). Each of these items reflect in favor of an exemption for me, Kaz Norvaisas, 

Page 3 
Kaz Norvaisas,President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc. 

Section 333 Exemption Petition 

President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc .. My UAS utilizes four (4) 

counter-rotating propellers for balance, control and stability. My UAS is equipped 

with GPS and auto return safety technology. Weighing less than five (5) pounds 

(far below the maximum 55 pound limit); including camera with gimbal. 

I, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc., 

considers safety as foremost with each flight. My small unmanned aircraft is 

designed to hover in place via GPS and operate in less than a 24 knot (15 mph) 

wind. For safety, stability and fear of financial loss I will not fly in winds exceeding 

16 kph (10 mph). Built in safety systems include a GPS mode that allows my 

UAS to hover in place when radio controls are released. With three modes to 

choose from, I utilize the Smart Mode for aerial videography/photography. This is 

the safest, most reliable and stable mode to prevent accident and hazard. When 

pilot communication is lost UAS is designed slowly descend to point of take off. I 

do not operate my UAS near airports, Hospitals nor Police heliports, and do not 

operate near areas where general public is within fifty to one hundred (50-100) 

yards depending on location, conditions and weather. I am constantly on alert for 

any manned aircraft (Police/Medical helicopters, etc.) and prepared to land/abort 

immediately to the nearest and safest ground point should a manned aircraft 

approach my location or I suspect manned aircraft may approach near my 

location. My UAS is capable of vertical and horizontal operations, and are flown 

only within my line of sight of me, as the remote control pilot. Utilizing battery 

power rather than combustible fuels, flights generally last between seven (7) and 

ten(10) minutes with an altitude under one hundred fifty (150) feet. I, Kaz 

Norvaisas utilize a fresh fully charged battery with each flight as a safety 

precaution; full flight time limit for each battery is twenty (20) to twenty five (25) 

minutes as tested. I do not operate my UAS at or below manufacture recommend 

minimum charge levels for operation; preferring to remain well within a safe 

operating range to insure adequate communication between radio control and 

UAS to eliminate potential for crash, loss of control or hazard. Reserve batteries 

are at hand with each exercise to insure replacement for sufficient safe level of 

operation. I do not believe in taking risk that may cause a crash, that could create 

hazard to the public/property/manned aircraft, and have no desire to lose an 

investment. I have clocked numerous practice flights in remote areas as a 

hobbyist simulating flights for future commercial use to gain familiarization with 

the characteristics of this specific UAS's performance under different temperature 

and weather conditions. I also practice computerized simulated flights to maintain 

adequate skills and response reflex time. All for the sake of safety. 

I, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc.'s, am 

extremely cautious when operating of my UAS/ultra light weight unmanned 

aircraft and will not "create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or 

the public." 112 P.L. 95 § 333 (b). Given the small size and weight of my UAS it 

Page4 
Kaz Norvaisas,President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc. 

Section 333 Exemption Petition 

falls well within Congress's contemplated safety zone when it promulgated the 

Reform Act and the corresponding directive to integrate UAS's into the national 

airspace system. Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans 

Foundation, Inc.'s UAS, used in hobby flight, has a demonstrable safety record 

and does not pose any threat to the general public or national security. 

IV. How Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, 

Inc.'s Request Will Benefit the Public As A Whole: 

Aerial videography for geographical awareness and for real estate marketing has 

been around for a long time through manned fixed wing aircraft and helicopters. 

For small budget non profits as ours and average homeowners the expense of 

such aerial videography is cost prohibitive. Only large companies and high end 

Realtors or luxury homeowners can afford to absorb such expense. Depriving 

non-luxury homeowners and local non profts from attracting exposure to there 

fundraising activities with this valuable marketing tool. , 

Congress has already proclaimed that it is in the public's interest to integrate 

commercially flown UAS's into the national airspace system, hence the passing 

of the Reform Act. Granting my, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping 

Veterans Foundation, Inc.'s, exemption request furthers the public interest 

through academic/visual awareness of the geographical benefits in and around 

the South Florida area. My ultra light weight UAS is battery powered and creates 

no emissions that can harm the environment. The consequence of my ultra light 

weight UAS crashing is far less than a full size helicopter or fixed wing aircraft; 

which are heavy, contain combustible fuel and can cause catastrophic 

devastation to the public. 

The public's interest is furthered by minimizing ecological and crash threat by 

permitting aerial video/photo capture through my battery operated ultra light 

weight UAS's. Permitting me, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping 

Veterans Foundation, Inc., to immediately fly within national air space furthers 

economic growth. Granting my exemption request substantially will improve the 

publics awareness of the Veterans Helping Veterans Foundations mission to help 

our forgotten homeless veterans who have slipped through the cracks. 

V. Reasons Why Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans 

Foundation, Inc.'s Exemption Will Not Adversely Affect SafetyOr How The 

Exemption Will Provide a Level of Safety At Least Equal To Existing Rule: 

My, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc.'s, 

exemption will not adversely affect safety. Quite the contrary, for the reasons 

Page 5 
Kaz Norvaisas,President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc. 

Section 333 Exemption Petition 

stated permitting me, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans 

Foundation, Inc., to log more flight time in FAA controlled airspace, with 

communication with the FAA, will allow me to contribute to the innovation and 

implementation of new and novel, as of yet undiscovered safety protocols for 

cooperation with the FAA. In addition I, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans 

Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc., submit the following representations of 

enhancements to current aerial videography and photography for real estate: 

a. My UAS weighs less than 5 pounds complete with a small ultra light 

weight high quality camera; 

b. I only operate my UAS below 200 feets (well within the 400 foot permissible 

ceiling set by the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012); 

c. my UAS only operate for 7-10 minutes per flight; 

d. I land my UAS prior to manufacturer recommended minimum level of 

battery power; 

e. I pilot my UAS through remote control only by line of sight; 

f. My UAS has GPS a flight safety feature whereby it hovers and then slowly 

lands if communication with the remote control pilot is lost; 

g. I actively analyze flight data and other sources of information to constantly 

update and enhance safety protocols; 

h. I only operate in reasonably safe environment that are strictly controlled, 

are away from power lines, elevated lights, airports and actively populated areas; 

i. I conduct extensive pre-flight inspections and protocol, during which safety 

carries primary importance; 

j. I always obtains all necessary permissions prior to operation; and, 

k. I have procedures in place to abort flights in the event of safety breaches 

or potential danger. 

My safety protocols provide a level of safety equal to or exceeding existing rules. 

It is important to note that absent the integration of commercial UAS into our 

national airspace system, helicopters are the primary means of aerial video and 

photography for community awareness and real estate. While the safety record 

of such helicopters is remarkably astounding, there has been local incident 

involving loss of life as well as extensive property damage; it is far safer to 

operate a battery powered ultra light weight UAS. First, the potential loss of tife 

is diminished because UAS's carry no people on board and I only operates my 

UAS in specific areas away from mass populations. Second, there is no fuel on 

board a UAS and thus the potential for fire or explosions is greatly diminished. 

Third, the small size and extreme maneuverability of my UAS allow me to 

remotely pilot away from and avoid hazards quickly and safely. Lastly, given its 

small size and weight, even when close enough to capture amazing images, my 

UAS need not be so close to the objects they are focused on through the 

technology and use of post editing software allowing pan and zoom. Accordingly, 

my UAS has been experimentally operated for familiarization/competency and 

will continue to operate at and above current safety levels. 

Page 6 
Kaz Norvaisas,President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc. 

Section 333 Exemption Petition 

VI. A Summary The FAA May Publish in the Federal Register: 

A. 14 C.F.R. 21 and 14 C.F.R. 91: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and The 

Like. 

14 C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth 

requirements for procurement of necessary airworthiness certificates in 

relation to FAR § 91.203(a)(1 ). The size, weight and enclosed operational 

area of my, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans 

Foundation, Inc.'s, UAS permits exemption from Part 21 because my UAS 

meets (and exceeds) an equivalent level of safety pursuant to Section 333 of 

the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraft from the 

airworthiness certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 44701 

(f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the 

FAA to exempt UAS's from the airworthiness certificate requirement in 

consideration of the weight, size, speed, maneuverability and proximity to 

areas such as airports and dense populations. My, Kaz Norvaisas, President 

of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc.'s, current and projected UAS's 

meet or exceed each of the elements. 

14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an 

airworthiness certificate. As no such certificate will be applicable in the form 

contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation is inapplicable. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As 

there are no on board pilots or passengers, and given the size of the UAS's, 

this Regulation is inapplicable. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved 

by maintaining a 

safety/flight manual delineating areas of where safety can be defined.•a The 

FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation in Exemption Nos. 

8607,8737, 8738,9299,9299A,9565,9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602,10700 

and 32827. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.121 regarding altimeter settings is inapplicable insofar as my 

UAS utilizes electronic global positioning systems with a barometric sensor. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) and (b) provides for the carrying of civil aircraft 

certifications and registrations. They are inapplicable for the same reasons 

described above. The equivalent level of safety will be achieved by 

maintaining any such required certifications and registrations by me, Kaz 

Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc .. 

B. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23: Marking of The Aircraft. 

Page 7 
Kaz Norvaisas,Pr$sident of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc. 

Section 333 Exemption Petition 

Applicable Codes of Federal Regulation require aircraft to be marked 

according to certain specifications. My UAS are, by definition, unmanned. 

They therefore do not have a cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which to 

mark certain words or phrases. Further, two-inch lettering is difficult to 

place on such small aircraft with dimensions smaller that minimal lettering 

requirement. Regardless, I will mark its UASs in the largest possible 

lettering by placing the word "EXPERIMENTAL" on its fuselage as 

required by 14 C.F.R. §45.29 (f) so that I the pilot, or anyone assisting me 

as a spotter with the UAV will see the markings. The FAA has previously 

issued exemptions to this regulation through Exemptions Nos. 8738, 

10167, 10167A and 10700. 

C. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113: Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: PIC. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113 (a) & (b), private pilots are limited to noncommercial operations. I, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping 

Veterans Foundation, Inc., can achieve an equivalent level of safety as 

achieved by current Regulations because my UAS does not carry any 

pilots or passengers. Further, I Kaz Norvaisas hold a airmans certificate 

private pilot SEL for more than twenty (20) years with a perfect saftey 

record. The risks attended to the operation of my UAS is far less than the 

risk levels inherent in the commercial activities outlined in 14 C.F.R. § 61, 

et seq. Thus, allowing me, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping 

Veterans Foundation, Inc., to operate my UAS meet and exceed current 

safety levels in relation to 14 

C.F.R. §61.113 (a) & (b). 

D. 14 C.F.R. 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.119 prescribes safe altitudes for the operation of civil 

aircraft. It allows helicopters to be operated at lower altitudes in certain 

conditions. My UAS will never operate at an altitude greater than 150AGL; 

safely below the standard of 400 AGL. I, Kaz Norvaisas, President of 

Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc., will however operate my UAS 

in safe areas away from public and traffic, providing a level of safety at 

least equivalent to or below those in relation to minimum safe altitudes. 

Given the size, weight, maneuverability and speed of my UAS, an 

equivalent or higher level of safety will be achieved. 

E. 14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance 

Inspections. 

The above-cited Regulations require, amongst other things, aircraft 

Page 8 
Kaz Norvaisas,President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc. 

Section 333 Exemption Petition 

owners and operators to "have [the] aircraft inspected as prescribed in 

subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as 

provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as 

prescribed in part 43 of this chapter .... " 

These Regulations only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. They 

will not, therefore, apply to my, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping 

Veterans Foundation, Inc.'s, UAS. However, as a safety precaution I inspect my 

UAS before and after each flight. 

A Summary The FAA May Publish in the Federal Register: A. 14 C.F.R. 21 and 

14 

C.F.R. 91: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and The Like. 14 C.F.R. 21, 

Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for 

procurement of necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR § 

91.203(a)(1). The size, weight and enclosed operational area of my UAS permits 

exemption from Part 21 because my, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans 

Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc.'s, UAS meets an equivalent level of safety 

pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt 

aircraft from the airworthiness certificate requirement under both the Act (49 

U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation 

permit the FAA to exempt UAS's from the airworthiness certificate requirement in 

consideration of the weight, size, speed, maneuverability and proximity to areas 

such as airports and dense populations. My UAS meets or exceeds each of the 

elements. 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an 

airworthiness certificate. As no such certificate will be applicable in the form 

contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation is inapplicable. 14 

C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As there are 

no pilots or passengers, and given the size. of the UAS's, this Regulation is 

inapplicable. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining a 

manual. The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation in 

Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 95658, 10167, 

maintenance program that involves regular software updates and curative 

measures for any damaged hardware. Therefore, an equivalent level of safety 

will be achieved. 

In summary, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans 

Foundation, Inc. seeks an exemption from the following Regulations: 

14 C.F.R. 21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113 (a) & (b); 14 

C.F.R. § 

91.7 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.1 03(b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.1 09; 14 

C.F.R. § 91.119; 14 C.F.R. § 91.121; 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a); 14 C.F.R. §§ 

91.203(a) and (b); 14 

C.F.R. § 91.405 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.407 (a)(1); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a)(2); 14 

Page9 
Kaz Norvaisas,President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc. 

Section 333 Exemption Petition 

C.F.R. § 

91.409 (a) (2); and, 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.417 (a) & (b) to commercially operate my, 

Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc.'s, small 

unmanned vehicle/lightweight unmanned aircraft vehicle in communityawareness 

and real estate operations, and real estate aerial videography/photography relies 

primarily on the use of larger aircraft runninQ on combustible fuel. Posingpotential 

risk to the pub~ic. Granting my, Kaz Norva1sas, President of Veterans Helping 

Veterans Foundation, Inc.'s, request for exemption will reduce current risk levels 

and thereby enhance safety. My UAS craft does not contain potentiallyexplosive 

fuel, is smaUer, lighter and more maneuverable than conventional real estate 

video and photographic aircraft with much less flight time. Further, I operate at 

rower altitudes and in controlled airspace eliminating potential public risk flying to 

and from established air fields. I, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping 

Veterans Found,ation, Inc., have been informally analyzing flight information and 

will compile safety protocols and the implementation of a flight operations manual 

for real estate usage that exceeds currently accepted means and methods for 

safe flight. Formal collection of information shared with the FAA will enhance the 

FAA's internal efforts to establish protocols for complying with the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. There are no personnel on board my, 

Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc.'s, UAS 

and therefore the likelihood of death or serious bodily injury is significantly 

diminished. My, Kaz Norvaisas, President of Veterans Helping Veterans 

Foundation, Inc.'s, operation of my UAS, weighing less than 5 pounds and 

travelling at lower speeds within limited areas will provide an equivalent level of 

safety as that achieved under current FARs. Accordingly I, Kaz Norvaisas, 

President of Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc., respectfully request 

that the FAA grant my exemption request and am willing to cooperate in sharing 

information to benefit the FAA, safety of manned aircraft, and the general public 

at large. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Kaz Norvaisas, Veterans Helping Veterans Foundation, Inc., 

Page 10 

Veterans Helping Veterans 

Foundation, Inc. 

18Vets.Org 

Kaz & Camille N orvaisas 

Director - President 

VeteransFoundationFL@Gmail. 

: 3850 NE 21 Ave. #10 

Lighthouse Point 

Florida 33064 

561-325-8407 FL 
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 

...---- P. 0. BOX 2508 

CINCINNATI, OH 45201 

Date: NOV 0 8 2012 

VETERANS HELPING VETERANS 

FOUNDATION INC 

3850 NE 21 AVE STE 10 

LIGHTHOUSE POINT, FL 33064 

Dear Applicant: 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Employer Identification Number: 

45-2689050 

DLN: 

17053066342012 

Contact Person: 

GARY MUTHERT 

Contact Telephone Number: 

(877) 829-5500 

Accounting Period Ending: 

July 31 

Public Charity Status: 

170 (b) (1) {A) {vi) 

Form 9~0 Re911ired: 

Yes 

Effective Date of Exemption: 

July 4, 2011 

Contribution Deductibility: 

Yes 

Addendum Applies: 

No 

ID# 31518 

We are pleased to inform you that upon review of your application for tax 

exempt status we have determined that you are exempt from Federal income tax 

under section 50l{c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions to you are 

deductible under section 170 of the Code. You are also qualified to receive 

tax deductible bequests, devises, transfers or gifts under section 2055, 2106 

or 2522 of the Code. Because this letter could help resolve any questions 

regarding your exempt status, you should keep it in your permanent records. 

Organizations exempt under section 501{c) {3) of the Code are further classified 

as either public charities or private foundations. we determined that you are 

a public charity under the Code section(s) listed in the heading of this 

letter. 

Please see enclosed Publication 4221-PC, compliance Guide for 50l(c) (3) Public 

Charities, for some helpful informatio~ about your responsibilities as an 

exempt organization. 

Letter 947 (DO/CG)