alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 1347

CLAUDIA LOURDES GRANADOS

- RUIZ , Petitioner ,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of a n Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : March 15, 2024 Decided: June 17, 2024

Before GREGORY and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

ON BRIEF: James Doyle Brousseau, BROUSSEA U & LEE, PLLC, Falls Church, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General , Anthony P. Nicastro, Assistant Director, Timothy Bo Stanton, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1347 Doc: 28 Filed: 06/17/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Claudia Granados

- Ruiz , a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing h er appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of h er applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and Granados

- Ruiz ’s claims and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substant ial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Granados

- Ruiz (B.I.A. Mar. 3 , 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1347 Doc: 28 Filed: 06/17/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4995 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4995

 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain leathered footwear 
                                for men.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Ms. Bonamici introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain leathered footwear 
                                for men.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEATHERED FOOTWEAR FOR MEN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Footwear for men,   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          with uppers of                                                    12/31/2015
                          leather other
                          than of pigskin
                          (other than house
                          slippers, work
                          footwear, tennis
                          shoes, basketball
                          shoes, gym shoes,
                          training shoes,
                          and the like, and
                          other than slip-
                          on footwear),
                          valued $27/pair
                          or higher,
                          designed to be
                          worn in lieu of,
                          but not over,
                          other footwear as
                          a protection
                          against water,
                          oil, grease or
                          chemicals or cold
                          or inclement
                          weather where
                          such protection
                          includes
                          protection
                          against water
                          that is imparted
                          by the use of a
                          coated or
                          laminated textile
                          fabric (provided
                          for in subheading
                          6403.99.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

KERR MACHINE CO., 

Plaintiff,

v.

VULCAN INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS, LLC, 

VULCAN ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, and 

CIZION, LLC d/b/a VULCAN 

INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING,

Defendant.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-200-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DECLARATION OF BARRY J. HERMAN IN SUPPORT OF 

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSIVE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF

I, Barry J. Herman, hereby declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney with the law firm Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, counsel for 

Defendants Vulcan Industrial Holdings, LLC, Vulcan Energy Services, LLC, and Cizion, LLC 

d/b/a Vulcan Industrial Manufacturing (collectively, “Vulcan”) in the above-entitled action. I 

submit this Declaration in support of Vulcan’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief. 

2. I make this declaration on the basis of personal knowledge, and if called to testify 

as witness, I would and could testify competently hereto.

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of Cizion, LLC d/b/a Vulcan 

Industrial Manufacturing v. Kerr Machine Co., PGR2020-00065, Paper 7 (Patent Owner’s 

Preliminary Response) (PTAB Sept. 11, 2020).

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart showing relatedness between U.S. Patent 

No. 10,591,070, U.S. Patent Application No. 16/876,414, and U.S. Patent Application No. 
16/897,659, along with true and correct copies of PTO filing receipts for each of the applications 

establishing relatedness.

5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the October 21, 2020 

Office Action regarding U.S. Patent Application No. 16/876,414. 

6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the Merriam-Webster 

definition of Annular. Annular, MERRIAM-WEBSTER, https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/annular (last visited Oct. 29, 2020). 

7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the Merriam-Webster 

definition of Bounded. Bounded, MERRIAM-WEBSTER, https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/bounded (last visited Oct. 29, 2020).

8. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of the Merriam-Webster 

definition of Bound. Bound, MERRIAM-WEBSTER, https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/bound (last visited Oct. 29, 2020).

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United Sates that the forgoing is 

true and correct. 

Dated: October 29, 2020 /s/ Barry J. Herman 

 Barry J. Herman
<PAGE>                                                      EXHIBIT 10(j)
                            SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                  STANHOME INC. SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN



      WHEREAS, Stanhome Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"),
has heretofore adopted and maintains a supplemental pension plan for the
benefit of certain of its employees designated the "Stanhome Inc.
Supplemental Pension Plan" (the "Plan"); and

      WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend in certain respects;

      NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in
Section 5 of the Plan, Section 3 of the Plan is amended, effective January
1, 1997, to add a new paragraph at the end thereof to read as follows:

            Notwithstanding any provision of this Section 3 to the
      contrary, the retirement benefits payable to a Participant (or his
      beneficiary) under the Plan shall be paid in a lump sum upon the
      occurrence of (i) a termination of Participant's employment under
      circumstances that entitle Participant to payment of a severance
      benefit under Paragraph 1 of the "Change in Control Agreement"
      between the Company and the Participant (or, if at the time of such
      termination the Change in Control Agreement is no longer in effect,
      under circumstances that would entitle the Participant to such
      payment if such Agreement were in effect), or (ii) a Change in
      Control (as defined in the Change in Control Agreement) at any time
      following the Participant's termination of employment from the
      Company.  Such lump-sum payment shall be the present value of the
      Supplemental Pension benefit payable to the Participant under the
      Plan using the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation immediate annuity
      interest rate as is in effect for the month in which the payment is
      made and the mortality table based on the UP-1984 Table, all as in
      accordance with generally acceptable actuarial principles.
      
      
      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be
executed by its duly authorized officers this 5th day of June, 1997.

                                    STANHOME INC.


                                By:/s/G. William Seawright
                                Title:President & CEO

ATTEST:

/s/Bruce H. Wyatt
Title:Secretary
EXHIBIT 2 

Sound recording of Nickelback’s 

musical composition Rockstar

(flash drive)

Case 1:20-cv-00497-RP Document 17-2 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

David Lopez-Guzman,

Petitioner,

v. No. 5:20-cv-00224-XR-RBF

Daniel Bible, Field Office Director, 

Immigration and Customs (ICE), Enforcement 

and Removal Operations, in his official 

capacity; Raymundo Castro, Warden, South 

Texas Detention Complex, in his official 

capacity; William P. Barr, Attorney General, 

in his official capacity; and Chad Wolf, 

Acting Secretary of the Department of 

Homeland Security,

Respondents.

ORDER

The Court enters the following Order:

1. Notwithstanding any prior decisions rendered by the immigration court 

regarding bond, Respondents shall, within ten (10) days of the date of this order, provide 

Mr. Lopez-Guzman with a new, de novo individualized bond hearing before an immigration 

judge, weighing all appropriate factors. The parties may submit evidence and present 

arguments at the bond hearing. The immigration judge shall consider the evidence and 

arguments, consistent with Matter of Guerra, I. & N. Dec. 37, 40 (BIA 2006). The 

immigration judge shall articulate a complete, de novo decision concerning bond.

2. This action shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, with each party 

to bear its own costs and/or attorney’s fees;
3. Nothing in this Order or the Stipulation between the parties shall be construed

as a concession of any rights or arguments by any Respondent or Petitioner; nor shall they

be construed to require Respondents to provide additional bond hearings to any other alien 

in similar or dissimilar circumstances, nor shall this Order or the Stipulation undermine any 

party’s litigation position in any other case in any federal or immigration court.

SIGNED this ____ day of ______________, 2020. 

________________________________

XAVIER RODRIGUEZ

United States District Judge

15th July
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5162 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber tow. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mrs. LUMMIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber 

tow. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC FIBER TOW. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5162 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic fiber tow consisting of 

a continuous filament acrylic 

tow with a nominal 320,000 

filaments, containing 98 percent or more by weight of acrylonitrile units, 2 percent or 

more but not more than 4 

percent of water, and not 

more than 2500 ppm sodium, 

with average filament measuring 1.67 decitex (plus or 

minus 0.08) (provided for in 

subheading 5501.30.00) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### RAYMOND V. LAMBERSON v. JAMES A. WHITCOMB.1

October 27, 1911.

Nos. 17,278—(53).

Defective sidewalk — verdict sustained by evidence.

In an action to recover for personal injuries caused by an alleged defective sidewalk constructed and maintained by defendant in front of his premises under permission of the city council, it is *held*that the verdict is supported by sufficient competent evidence and that the damages awarded by the jury are not excessive.

Action in the district court for Ramsey county against the city of St. Paul and James A. Whitcomb to recover $5,150 for personal injuries. The answer alleged that if plaintiff was injured it was through his own carelessness and through conditions of climate and season over which defendant had no control. The reply was a general denial. When plaintiff rested at the trial, the motion of defendant city to dismiss the action as to it was granted. The case was tried before Orr, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $1,000. Erom an order denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, he appealed.

Affirmed.

*Deuisch, Allen & Breding*and *Sol Fligelmmi,*for appellant.

*Wondra & Helm*and *J.*W. *Pinch,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 132 N. W. 991.

Brown, J.

Action to recover for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff from a defective sidewalk in front of the place of business of defendant Whitcomb, in which plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant Whit-comb appealed from an order denying a new trial.

The evidence justified the jury in finding that the sidewalk, alleged to have been in a defective condition and the cause of plaintiff’s injuries, was laid by defendant Whitcomb in front of his prem*496ises with the consent of the city, and that he was under obligation to keep and maintain the same in safe condition for use. On this theory the action was dismissed as to defendant city, of which order no complaint is made. The evidence further tends to show that the walk was defective and out of repair, in consequence of which plaintiff was caused to fall, resulting in a broken arm, and, it is claimed, .a dislocated shoulder. The jury awarded a verdict of $1,000. The ■only questions presented on this appeal are: (1) Whether the sidewalk was defective and out of repair, and the cause of plaintiff’s injury; and (2) whether the damages awarded by the jury are excessive. We have examined the record with care, and find therein ■evidence sufficient to justify the verdict upon all elements essential to plaintiff’s right of action. We also conclude that the verdict is not excessive. A discussion of the evidence would serve no useful purpose.

Order affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 524 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the provisions of 

the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that limit distributions 

from medical-related tax-preferred accounts for medicines only if the 

medicines are prescribed drugs or insulin and to repeal the increase 

in additional tax on distributions from health savings accounts and 

Archer MSAs not used for qualified medical expenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2011 

Mr. QUAYLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act that limit distributions from medical-related 

tax-preferred accounts for medicines only if the medicines 

are prescribed drugs or insulin and to repeal the increase 

in additional tax on distributions from health savings 

accounts and Archer MSAs not used for qualified medical 

expenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 524 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Consumer3 driven Health Care Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORD5 ABLE CARE ACT RULE LIMITING DISTRIBU6 TIONS FOR MEDICINE QUALIFIED ONLY IF 

7 FOR PRESCRIBED DRUG OR INSULIN. 

8 (a) HSAS.—Subparagraph (A) of section 223(d)(2) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik10 ing the last sentence. 

11 (b) ARCHER MSAS.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

12 220(d)(2) of such Code is amended by striking the last 

13 sentence. 

14 (c) HEALTH FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS

15 AND HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS.—Sec16 tion 106 of such Code is amended by striking subsection 

17 (f). 

18 (d) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

19 (1) DISTRIBUTIONS FROM SAVINGS AC20 COUNTS.—The amendments made by subsections (a) 

21 and (b) shall apply to amounts paid with respect to 

22 taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010. 

23 (2) REIMBURSEMENTS.—The amendment made 

24 by subsection (c) shall apply to expenses incurred 

25 with respect to taxable years beginning after Decem26 ber 31, 2010. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 524 IH

1 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF INCREASE IN ADDITIONAL TAX ON DIS2 TRIBUTIONS FROM HSAS AND ARCHER MSAS 

3 NOT USED FOR QUALIFIED MEDICAL EX4 PENSES. 

5 (a) HSAS.—Section 223(f)(4)(A) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘20 per7 cent’’ and inserting ‘‘10 percent’’. 

8 (b) ARCHER MSAS.—Section 220(f)(4)(A) of such 

9 Code is amended by striking ‘‘20 percent’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘15 percent’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to distributions made after Decem13 ber 31, 2010. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eastern Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin M. Shook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/    KEVIN M. SHOOK                 
|Kevin M. Shook Chief Financial Officer
|

Dated: March 13, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5462 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5462

      To extend a temporary reduction of duty on Isoxadifen-Ethyl.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Price of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend a temporary reduction of duty on Isoxadifen-Ethyl.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ISOXADIFEN-ETHYL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.45 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Isoxadifen-Ethyl) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``Free'' in the general rate of duty column 
        and inserting ``0.5%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5003 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Dimethyl malonate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Dimethyl 

malonate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIMETHYL MALONATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.49 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Dimethyl malonate) is amended by striking the date in 

7 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5003 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-119008 on Form S-8 of our reports, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Rotech Healthcare Inc. and subsidiaries and on the effectiveness of
Rotech Healthcare Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting, dated March 5, 2010, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rotech Healthcare Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2009.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP
|                            
|Certified Public Accountants
|Orlando, Florida            
|March 5, 2010