p. 1



# OAR Box 1145
Prepped by Ollie Stewart



# Document

Number: 

# 9 ) F. R . Jun e
Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 5

Printed 4/23/2008 8:55:55AM 

# 27 , 198 9

Sheet 9of 88P. 2 

# A •ii-i*

Federa l Registe r

/ Vol : 54 , No

. 12 2 /

Tuesday , Jun e 27 , 198 9 / Rule s an dRegulation s 2701 5

existin g SI Plimi t

i s no t feasibl e an dals o tha t ther e ran o othe r

feasibl e limi t

mor e stringen t tha t wha t i s containe di nGM' s variance

. Thi s clai mo f infeasibilit y ha s no t bee n adequatel y documente d particularl y i nligh t

o f th e fac t tha t complying-coating'system s ar e available , boot hincineratio n i s i nus e b y G M (includin g a t

it s Arlington , Texas , plant) , an dspra y boot hrecirculatio n i s bein g use db y automotiv e manufacturer s outsid e th e Unite dState s an di s planne d fo r us e withi nth e Unite dStates

. 5

. USEP A disagree s wit hth e us e o f 2 7 percen t D La s th e baselin e fo r evaluatin g cost-effectiveness

. G M Lordstow nwa s usin g 1 7 percen t D La s o f thedat e o f

GM' s Yello w Boo k

an d adoptio no f

Ohio' s autocoatin g rule

. Th e leve l o f contro l durin g thi s perio dis , therefore , di e appropriat e baselin e fo r evaluatin g cost-effectiveness : Th e subsequen t

implementatio no f

an y partia l contro l measure s (e;g. , conversio nt o 2 7 percen t DL ) doe s no t constitut e avali dargumen t fo r th e economi c infeasibilit y o f achievin g complianc e wit ha nemissio n limi t previousl y establishe da s RACT

. A s state db y Ohi o i n it s Augus t 13,1986 , lette r t o GM , "[t]h e us e o f

incrementa l cost-effectivenes s woul dpromot e variance s b y allowing.entitie s t o emplo y marginall y unacceptabl e contro l technolog y o r

onl y g o partwa y i n achievin g complianc e wit ha n applicabl e emissio nlimitatio nan dthe n argu e tha t

t o achiev e ful l complianc e i s no t cost-effective. " Fina l Actio n Base dupo narevie w o f th e SI P revisio nreques t

an dth e publi c comment s raise do n behal f o f Genera l Motors ' Lordstow naut o assembl y plan t i nWarren , Ohio , USEP A i s takin g final actio nt o disapprov e thi s SI Previsio na s no t constitutin g RACT ; a s require db y th e CAA

. USEP A i s no t evaluatin g th e merit s o f thi s proposa l a s atemporar y relaxation , becaus e i t

wa s submitte da s apermanen t

relaxation

. However , USEP A wUl evaluat e an y complianc e dat e extensio n whic hi s submitte dfo r approval

. Unde r Executiv e Orde r

12291 , today' s actio ni s no t

"Major"

. Thi s actio ni s no t subjec t t o revie w b y th e Offic e o f Managemen t

an dBudget

. Unde r sectio n307(b)(1 ) o f

th e Act , petition s fo r

judicia l revie w o f

thi s actio nmus t

b e file di nth e Unite dState s Cour t of'Appeal s fo r

th e appropriat e circui t b y Augus t

28,1989

. Thi s actio n ma y no t b e challenged ' late r

i n proceeding s t o enforc e it s requirements

. (Se e § 307(b)(2). ) Lis t o f Subject s i n 4 0 CF RPar t 5 2 Environmenta l protection,

. Ai r pollutio n control , Ozone , Hydrocarbons

. Date d)un e 14,1989

. Valda s V

. Adamkus , Regional Administrator. Titl e 4 0 o f

th e Cod e o f

Federa l Regulations , Chapte r

I , Par t 52 , i s amende da s follows : PAR T52—APPROVA L AN D PROMULGATIO N O F IMPLEMENTATIO N PLAN S Subpar t KK—Ohi o 1

. Thi s notic e i s issue dunde r authorit y o f

th e Clea nAi r

Act , a s amended

. Authority : 4

2 U.S.C

. 7401—7642

. 2

. Sectio n 52.188 5 i s revise db y addin g ne w paragrap h(1 ) t o rea da s follows : § 52.188 5 Contro l strategy : Ozone

. **** * (l ) Disapproval. O nOctobe r 21,1986 , th e Ohi o Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y submitte darevisio n t o th e ozon e portio n o f

th e Ohi o Stat e Implementatio nPla n(SIP ) fo r Volatil e Organi c Compound s (VOC)

. Thi s revisio n reques t

i s fo r arelaxatio no f emissio nlimitatio n fo r

topcoa t an dfina l repai r coating s operation s fo r Genera l Motor s Lordstow naut o assembl y facilit y i n Warre n(Trumbul l County)

. Ohio

. A s aresul t

o f USEPA' s disapproval , th e sourc e remain s subjec t t o th e contro l requirement s o f th e Ohi o Administrativ e Cod e (OAC ) Rul e 3745

- 09(C)

. ' [F RDoc

. 89-1491 3 File d6-26-89 ; 8:4 5 am ] BILLIN G COD E 6560-50- M

4 0 CF R Part 6 0 [AD-FRL-3605-5 1 Standard s o f Performanc e fo r Ne w Stationar y Sources ; Amendmen t t o Tes t Method s an d Procedure s AGENCY : Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y (EPA)

. ACTION : Technica l Amendment

. SUMMARY : O n Octobe r

6,1988 , anotic e entitle d"Sewag e Treatmen t Plants " wa s publishe di n theFedera l Registe r (5 3 FR 39412)

. Thi s rul e adde d§ 60.154(d)

. A notic e entitle d"Amendment s t o Tes t Method s an dProcedures " wa s publishe di nth e Federa l Registe r o n Februar y 14,198 9 (5 4 FR6660)

. Thi s rul e consolidate dal l tes t

method s an d procedure s necessar y t o determin e complianc e wit hth e applicabl e standard s o r relate dmonitorin g requirement s an dclarifie dcertai n procedures

. Th e rul e revise d§ 60.15 4 (a) , (b ) an d(c ) int o § 60:15 4 (a ) an d(b ) an d appear s t o delet e § 60;l54(d)

. Th e purpos e o f

thi s action , i s t o reserv e § 60.154(c) , stat e tha t

§ 60.154(d ) remain s unchange dfro mth e Octobe r 6 , 1988 , rule , an dwil l mak e mino r corrections

. EFFECTIV EDATE : Jun e 27,1989

. FOR: FURTHE

RINFORMATIO

N CONTACT : Roge r Shigehara , Emissio n Measuremen t Branc h(MD-19) , Technica l Suppor t Division , U.S

. Environmental ' Protectio n Agency , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a27711 , telephon e numbe r (919 ) 541-1058

. SUPPLEMENTAR YINFORMATION : Lis t o f Subject s i n 4 0 CF RPar t 6 0 Ai r pollutio ncontrol

. Date : Jun e 15,1989

. DonR

. Clay , Acting Assistant

Administrator

for Air and Radiation. 4 0 CF RPar t

6 0 i s amende da s follows : PAR T60—[AMENDED ] 1

. Th e authorit y citatio n fo r Par t 6 0 continue s t o rea da s follows : Authority : Section s 101 , 111 , 114,116 , an d 30 1 o f th e CleanAir

Act , a s amende d(4

2 U.S.C

. 7401 , 7411 , 7414 , 7416 , an d7601)

. 2

. I n§ 60.154 , paragraph s (c ) an d(d ) ar e adde dt o rea da s follows : § 60.15 4 Tes t

method s an dprocedures

. * • + * * * (c ) [Reserved ] (d ) Th e owne r

o r operato r o f an y sludg e incinerato r

subjec t t o th e provision s o f

thi s subpar t

shal l conduc t aperformanc e tes t

durin g whic hth e monitorin g an drecordin g device s require dunde r

§ 60:153(a)(l) , (b)(1) , (b)(2) , (b)(3) , an d(b)(4 ) ar e installe dan d operatin g an dfo r

whic hth e samplin g an danalysi s procedure s require dunde r § 60.153(b)(5 ) ar e performed..Th e owne r o r operato r

shal l provid e th e Administrato r

a t leas t 3 0 day s prior

notic e o f th e performance-tes t

t o affor d th e Administrato r

th e opportunit y to

hav e a nobserve r

present

. (1 ) Fo r incinerator s tha t

commence d constructio no r

modificatio n o n o r befor e Apri l 18 ; 1986 , th e performanc e tes t shal l b e conducted' , withi n 36 0 day s o f th e effectiv e dat e o f

thes e regulation s unles s th e monitorin g an drecordin g device s require dunde r § 60.153(a)(l) : , (b)(1)

. (b)(2)

. (b)(3),.an d(b)(4) ; wer e installe dan doperatin g an dth e samplin g an danalysi s procedure s require dunde r § 60.153(b)(5 ) wer e performe ddurin g th eP. 3

2701 6 Federa l Registe r / Vol

. 54 , No

. 12 2 /

Tuesday , Jun e 27 , 198 9 / Rule s an dRegulation s

mos t recen t performanc e tes t

an da recor do f th e measurement s take n durin g th e performanc e tes t i s available

. (2 ) Fo r incinerator s (ha t

commenc e constructio no r

modificatio nafte r

Apri l 13,1986 , th e dat e o f

th e performanc e tes t shal l b e determine db y di e requirement s i n§ 60.8

. (3 ) Fo r th e initia l performanc e tes t require db y paragrap h(d ) o f thi s section , th e thre e sample s collecte db y Tes t Metho d5 shal l b e analyze dfirst fo r particulat e mas s an dthe ni non e o f th e followin g tw o ways : (i ) Tw o sample s shal l b e analyze db y neutro nactivatio nfo r

arsenic , cadmium , chromium , copper , nickel , selenium , an d zinc ; an don e sampl e shal l b e analyze d b y atomi c absorptio nfo r berylliu man d lead

. Th e sampl e analyze dfo r berylliu m an dlea dshal l b e analyze daccordin g t o Metho d104 an dMetho d12 , respectively

. (ii ) Thre e sample s shal l b e analyze d b y atomi c absorptio nfo r arsenic , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , copper , lead , nickel , selenium , an dzinc

. Th e sample s shal l b e analyze dfo r arsenic , beryllium , an dlea daccordin g t o Metho d 108 , Metho d104 , an dMetho d12 , respectively

. Th e sample s shal l b e analyze dfo r

cadmium , chromium , copper , nickel , selenium , an dzin c accordin g t o standar danalytica l procedure s a s recommende db y atomi c absorptio nequipmen t

manufacturers

. (4 ) Durin g th e initia l performanc e tes t require db y paragrap h(d ) o f thi s section , sludg e sample s shal l b e collecte dfo r

th e purpos e o f

determinin g th e metal s conten t

o f th e sludge

. Sample s shal l b e collecte dfro mth e sludg e charge dt o th e incinerato r a t th e beginnin g o f

eac hru nan da t approximatel y 3 0 minut e interval s thereafte r

unti l th e tes t

ru nends

. Th e sludg e sample s collecte ddurin g eac h tes t ru nshal l b e combine dint o asingl e composit e sample

. Durin g th e performanc e test , thre e composit e sample s shal l b e generated

. Th e composit e sample s shal l b e analyze di n on e o f th e followin g tw o ways : (i ) Th e composit e sample s shal l b e analyze dfo r

arsenic , cadmium , chromium , copper , nickel , selenium , an d zin c b y neutro nactivatio nprocedures , an dfo r berylliu man dlea db y atomi c absorptio naccordin g t o Metho d10 4 an d Metho d12 , respectively

. (ii ) Th e composit e sample s shal l b e analyze db y atomi c absorptio nfo r arsenic , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , copper , lead , nickel , selenium , an dzinc

. Th e sample s shal l b e analyze dfo r arsenic , beryllium , an dlea daccordin g t o Metho d108 , Metho d104 , an dMetho d12 , respectively

. Th e sample s shal l b e analyze dfo r

cadmium , chromium , copper , nickel , selenium , an dzin c accordin g t o standar danalytica l procedure s a s recommende db y atomi c absorptio n equipmen t

manufacturers

. (5 ) Th e requirement s o f paragraph s (d)(3 ) an d(d)(4 ) o f

tiiis sectio n shal l appl y onl y durin g th e first performanc e tes t require dpursuan t

t o thes e regulations

. §60.33 5 [Amended ] 3

. I n§ 60.335(c)(1) , th e first equatio n i s revise dt o rea da s follows : NO,=[NO IO ) (P

r /P„ ) "e"""- 110118 " ! (288°K / T. ) *•» §60.47 4 [Amended ] 4

. I n§ 60.474(c)(4 ) introductor y tex t "20 0 lb/ton " i s revise dt o rea d"200 0 lb / ton"

. §60.48 5 [Amended ] 5

. I n§ 60.485(g)(4) , th e equatio ni s revise dt o rea da s follows :

H T = 

## K2 C ,

i= 1 ' 

## H :
[F RDoc

. 89-1468 0 File d6-26-89 ; 8:4 5 am ] BILLIN G COD E 6560-50- M

4 0 CF R Part 8 0 [AMS-FRL-3607-t ] 

# V 

# .

0 - ^

Volatilit y Regulation s fo r Gasolin e an d Alcoho l Blend s Sol d I n Calenda r Year s 198 9 an d Beyond ; Correctio n AGENCY : Environmenta l Protectio n Agency

. ACTION: Fina l rule ; correction

. SUMMARY

: Thi s notic e correct s mino r error s i nanotic e o f

final rulemakin g promulgatin g volatilit y regulation s fo r gasolin e an dalcoho l blends , whic hwa s publishe do nMarc h22,198 9 (5 4 F R 11868)

. FO R FURTHE R INFORMATIO N CONTACT : Rober t E

. Kenney , Senio r

Staf f Attorney , Fiel dOperation s an dSuppor t Divisio n (EN-397F) , EPA , 40 1 M Stree t SW: , Washington , D C 20460

. Telephone : (202 ) 382-2633

. SUPPLEMENTAR YINFORMATION : Thi s notic e correct s mino r

error s i n anotic e o f fina l rulemakin g promulgatin g volatilit y regulation s fo r gasolin e an d alcoho l blends , whic hwa s publishe do n Marc h22,198 9 (5 4 FR11868)

. Th e reason s fo r

thes e correction s ar e se t fort hbelow

. (1 ) I nth e fina l rulemaking , th e Agenc y adde dane w definitio n o f "ethano l blender " a t

4 0 CF R80.2(v)

. Thi s definitio ncreate daspecia l subcategor y o f refine r fo r person s wh o produc e gasolin e solel y throug hth e additio n o f ethano l t o finishedgasoline , wit h separat e liabilit y an ddefens e provision s fro mothe r

refiners

. Whe nth e fina l regulation s wer e drafted , thes e partie s wer e inadvertend y omitte dfro mcertai n provision s whic hshoul dhav e applie dt o them , specificall y 4 0 CF R80.27(a) , 80.27(d)(3)(ii) , an d80.28(g)(4)(iii)(F)

. Thi s notic e correct s thes e inadverten t omissions

. (2 ) Sectio n4. 1 o f

4 0 CF RPar t

80 , Appendi x D , describe s th e type s o f samplin g container s tha t ca n b e use da s par t o f th e promulgate dsamplin g procedures

. A s published , thi s sectio n provide s tha t

th e onl y can s tha t

ca n b e use dfo r thi s purpos e ar e "thos e wit hth e seam s soldere do nth e exterio r surfac e wit haflu x o f

rosini n asuitabl e solvent. " Sinc e publication , EP A ha s learne dtha t

suc hcan s ma y b e difficul t t o procure
. Therefore , th e languag e i n sectio n 4. 1 ha s bee nrevise dt o stat e tha t can s soldere di ndii s manne r ar e preferred , bu t

tha t i f suc hcan s ar e no t availabl e othe r

can s mad e wid i a welde dconstructio n ma y b e use da s lon g a s thei r

constructio n i s no t

affecte d b y (an di t

doe s no t

affect ) th e gasolin e bein g sampled

. (3 ) Sectio n12. 6 o f

Appendi x D set s fort hawate r

displacemen t

metho do f samplin g gasoline

. Thi s metho dwa s promulgate derroneousl y becaus e th e samplin g an dtestin g method s wer e intende dt o eliminat e al l contac t wit h wate r i n orde r t o allo w thei r

us e wit h alcoho l blends

. Th e wate r displacemen t method , however , allow s direc t contac t betwee n wate r

an dproduc t

bein g sampled

. Therefore , i t

i s bein g delete d a s a n acceptabl e samplin g method

. Th e Agenc y note s tha t

th e America n Societ y fo r Testin g an dMaterial s (ASTM ) doe s no t allo w us e o f

thi s samplin g metho di n conjunctio nwit halcoho l blends

. Se e AST M D-4814-88 , Anne x A2 , sectio n A2.6.2

. (4 ) Figur e 4 o f

Appendi x D wa s draw n incorrectly

. I n eac ho f

th e sampl e probe s illustrate di n thi s figure, th e cente r lin e notatio n appeare dt o b e a"w " rathe r tha n a"CL " (th e prope r notation)

. I n addition , i nProb e (C ) th e orific e facin g upstrea mshoul dhav e bee n asmoot h curv e instea do f

ashar p angle , an dther e shoul dno t

hav e bee n aspac e i n di e lin e facin g downstream

. A ne w Figur e 4 correctin g these.error s i s include di nthi s notice

. (5 ) Sectio n8. 1 o f

Metho d1 o f

4 0 CF R Par t 80 , Appendi x E , describe s th e sampl e transfe r

portio no f

th e volatilit y tes t procedures

. Languag e ha s bee n adde dt o thi s sectio nt o mak e clea r tha t th e fue l chambe r

shoul db e drie dprio r