alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

# Time and Date:

10 a.m., Thursday, October 5, 2000. 

# Place:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551. 

# Status:

Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered: 

1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees. 

2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the Board; 202-452-3204. 

# Supplementary Information:

You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting. 

Dated: September 28, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-25318 Filed 9-28-00; 10:36 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5461 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Tetraconazole. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. PRICE of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Tetraconazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TETRACONAZOLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.15 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Tetraconazole) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5461 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 27, 2010

p0419 

# Order

April 27, 2010

140454

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140454 COA: 294606 Branch CC: 09-019231-FC JOHN HENRY CHANEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7078** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CALVIN FONVILLE, a/k/a Cal , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2 : 95

- cr - 00 049

- RBS

- 3 )

Submitted : October 21, 2014 Decided: October 24, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

A ffirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Calvin Fonville, Appellant Pro Se

. Kevin Michael Comstock , Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circui t.2 PER CURIAM:
Calvin Fonville appeals the district court ’ s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Fonville , No. 2:95

- cr - 00049

- RBS

- 3 (E.D. Va. July 1, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit
          99.4**
 
 
 CERTIFICATE
          PURSUANT TO
 18
          U.S.C.
          SECTION 1350
 AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
          connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB of
          Standard Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the nine months ended May 31,
          2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
          hereof,
          I, B. Gordon Brooke, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer
          and
          Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
          to
          Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
          knowledge
          and belief:
 
 1.
          The
          Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
          or 15
          (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
          The
          information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
          material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
          Company.
 
 
 Date:
          July 10, 2007
 
 GORDON
          BROOKE
 B.
          Gordon
          Brooke
 Chief
          Accounting Officer
 Chief
          Financial Officer and Director
  
 -1-
# Journal officiel C 128A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2563 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 128A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 49e année1 juin 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2563

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 128A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

49e année1 juin 2006

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Informations |
| | CEPOL |
| 2006/C 128A/1 | Avis de vacance | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

III   Informations

CEPOL

2006/C 128A/1

Avis de vacance

1

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

III Informations

CEPOL

| 1.6.2006 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 128/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2006

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 128/1

---

AVIS DE VACANCE

(2006/C 128 A/01)

Nous recherchons un expert de solide culture générale possédant des connaissances et des expériences approfondies en matière de gestion, d'éducation et de formation continue pour le poste de

DIRECTEUR

de son secrétariat permanent établi à Bramshill, Hampshire, Royaume-Uni.

CEPOL est un organe de l'Union européenne qui offre des cours de formation à l'intention des hauts responsables des services de police des États membres de l'UE. Les effectifs du secrétariat, au nombre de vingt-deux agents, sont subordonnés au directeur et appuient les activités du Collège dans les domaines administratif, financier et logistique.

Le directeur/la directrice soutiendra et conseillera les présidents et membres du conseil d'administration et des différentes commissions spécialisées, surveillera la préparation des programmes de travail, l'établissement du budget et l'élaboration des rapports annuels. Il/elle négociera des accords de coopération et représentera CEPOL auprès des instances communautaires chargées des affaires policières et de formation.

Conformément au régime d'embauche communautaire, les candidats au poste devront entre autres posséder la nationalité d'un des États membres de l'Union, avoir une excellente maîtrise d'une des langues communautaires et une connaissance satisfaisante d'une seconde langue officielle de l'Union européenne. Les candidats retenus seront soumis par ailleurs à un contrôle de sécurité par les services de sûreté locaux.

Pour de plus amples informations et pour les formulaires d'inscription, visitez la page d'accueil CEPOL: www.cepol.net

Les demandes devront être adressées uniquement par courrier électronique à: janos.fehervary@bmi.gv.at

| SECRÉTARIAT CEPOL |
| --- |
| CEPOL House, Bramshill, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 0JW, United Kingdom |
| Tél. (44-1256) 60 26 68, fax (44-1256) 60 29 96. |
| Page d'accueil: www.cepol.net |

SECRÉTARIAT CEPOL

CEPOL House, Bramshill, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 0JW, United Kingdom

Tél. (44-1256) 60 26 68, fax (44-1256) 60 29 96.

Page d'accueil: www.cepol.net

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of North State Bancorp (the Company) for the period ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Larry D. BarbourLarry D. BarbourPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Kirk A. WhorfKirk A. WhorfChief Financial OfficerMarch 28, 2007
#### SALINAS v. STATE.

No. 26932.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 7, 1954.

Earl Earp, Monahans, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, -Commissioner.

This is a conviction for possessing marijuana; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

A search, of appellant s residence revealed three separate containers of marijuana, consisting of a mixture of stems, leaves, and seeds.

Whether the search of the residence was or was not authorized need not be determined, for appellant, testifying as a witness in his own behalf, admitted the possession of the marijuana and claimed that he possessed it for medicinal purposes.

. Haying admitted the possession of the marijuana, appellant was in no position to complain o.f. proof of that same fact by the officers. Soble v. State, 153 Tex.Cr.R. 629, 218 S.W.2d 195; Schaefer v. State, 121 Tex.Cr.R. 220, 53 S.W.2d 302; Johnson v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 293, 42 S.W.2d 421.

The other questions briefed by appellant all center around the question above discussed and are determined thereby.

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-88,748-01

IN RE ANTHONY AG ADO, Relat or
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 1236042-A IN THE 180 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an a pplication for a

writ of mandamus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 180th District Court of Har ris County , that more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the application has not y et been forwa rded to this Court. Relator contends that the district court enter ed an or der de signating issues on May 11, 2018. Respondent, the J udg e of the 180 District Court of Har ris County , shall file a response with t h this Court by having the District Clerk submit the rec ord on such habea s corpus application. I n the alterna tive, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the order desig nating issues and then have the District Clerk submit the rec ord on such application. I n either case , Respondent’s answe r shall2

be submitt ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s of the date of this order

. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus will be held in abe y ance until R espondent ha s submitt ed his response

.
Filed: Aug ust 8, 2018 Do not publish
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

FRANCISCO MORELOS-GRACIDAS,

a.k.a. Francisco Moreles, a.k.a. Francisco

Morelos, a.k.a. Francisco MorelosGonzalez,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-10358

D.C. No. 4:13-cr-00025-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2014** 

Before: ALARCÓN, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Morelos-Gracidas appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

FILED

FEB 27 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
attempted reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Morelos-Gracidas contends that the district court erred by failing to discuss

its reasons for declining to give him a downward departure or variance for cultural

assimilation. We do not review this claim except as part of our review of the

substantive reasonableness of the sentence. See United States v. Vasquez-Cruz,

692 F.3d 1001, 1004-08 (9th Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 76 (2013). 

Contrary to Morelos-Gracidas’s argument, the district court did not abuse its

discretion in imposing his sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51

(2007). The below-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances,

including Morelos-Gracidas’s criminal and immigration history. See id.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-10358
Exhibit 32.2Certification of CFO pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002I, Paul L. Beldin, Chief Financial Officer of America First Apartment Investors, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that:(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.      Date: March 7, 2007     /s/ Paul L. Beldin     Paul L. Beldin  Chief Financial Officer  *A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AmericaFirst Apartment Investors, Inc. will be retained by America First Apartment Investors, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
#### GAINES v. STATE.

No. 24836.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 21, 1950.

*430B. R. Reeves, of Palestine, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of possessing whiskey for the purpose of sale in a dry area, and his punishment was assessed at 90 days in jail and a fine of $100.

The State relied on the testimony of the sheriff to the effect that he saw appellant in a car with two others, and that appellant was in the act of pouring some whiskey out of a pint bottle; that he mopped some of it up and produced it upon the trial.

The only other evidence was an agreement that the area was dry, and proof that some seven years previously, appellant had been convicted on a plea of guilty to possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale in a dry area in three cases.

Such evidence of prior convictions was not admissible for any purpose, and appellant’s objection thereto should have been sustained.

Proof of recent sales of liquor in a dry area by the accused has been held admissible on his trial for possession of liquor for the purpose of sale in such an area. See Smiley v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 342, 174 S.W.2d 973.

But a sale IS months prior to the possession by an accused of less than a quart of whiskey in a dry area has been held insufficient to prove possession for the purpose of sale. See Albin v. State, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 114, 185 S.W.2d 447.

The rule permitting proof of a prior sale has no application to testimony showing that the accused pleaded guilty to or was convicted of possessing whiskey for the purpose of sale on a prior occasion. See Brooks v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. *526,*137 S.W.2d 768.

No presumption of law is applicable here save the presumption of innocence, and there is no proof that the whiskey in the pint bottle was possessed by appellant for the purpose of sale.

The State has properly confessed in its brief that the conviction should not be sustained.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court
Exhibit
      23.1




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





To
      the
      Board of Directors


Interactive
      Television Networks, Inc. and Subsidiary





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement on Form
      S-8 (Nos.
      333-132300) of Interactive Television Networks, Inc. and Subsidiary **** of
      our
      report dated April 10, 2007, appearing
      in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Interactive
      Television Networks, Inc. and Subsidiary for the
      year ended December 31, 2006.







/s/ LOPEZ,
      BLEVINS, BORK & ASSOCIATES, LLP





Lopez,
      Blevins, Bork & Associates, LLP


REGISTERED
      PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


April
      19,
      2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL 

INC., AND EMC CORPORATION,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-404

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Plaintiff, WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, files this 

disclosure statement pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and states the 

following: WSOU Investments, LLC is a private corporation whose parent is WSOU Holdings, 

LLC. Neither entity is public traded.

Dated: May 19, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge

Texas State Bar No. 24059147 

Ryan S. Loveless

Texas State Bar No. 24036997 

Travis L. Richins

Texas State Bar No. 24061296

ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Telephone: (817) 470-7249

Facsimile: (817) 887-5950

Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com

Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com

Travis@EtheridgeLaw.com

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document was served upon all counsel of record via the Court's 

CM/ECF electronic filing system in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on May 

19, 2020.

/s/ James L. Etheridge

James L. Etheridge
Order entered October 17, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00760-CR

BERNARD ANDRE EDWARDS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1476339-Y

ORDER

Before the court are appellant’s October 13, 2016 pro se motion to designate additional 

exhibits and motion for extension of time to file a brief. Because the report’s record filed 

September 6, 2016 certified exhibits volume as complete, we DENY appellant’s motion to 

designate additional exhibits. 

We GRANT appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file a brief and extend the 

time to DECEMBER 1, 2016. We caution appellant that no further extension will be granted 

absent extenuating circumstances.

s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5242 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phosphoric acid, tris (2- 

ethylhexyl)ester). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phosphoric 

acid, tris (2-ethylhexyl)ester). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRIS (2- 

4 ETHYLHEXYL)ESTER). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.62 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 Phosphoric acid, tris (2-ethylhexyl)ester)) is amended by 

8 striking the date in the effective period column and insert9 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5242 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS