alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 02-7635



# 
L ARRY D ARNELL B ELCHER ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-70018, CA-01-39-7) Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 27, 2002 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Larry Darnell Belcher, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis,OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM:Larry Darnell Belcher, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion and his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). In this case, the district court dismissed Belcher’s § 2255 motion on the ground that it was untimely filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our review of the record in this case reveals that Belcher’s judgment of conviction became final on September 18, 2000, the date the Supreme Court denied certiorari relative to his direct appeal. Belcher signed his § 2255 motion on January 2, 2001, which is the date this court considers to be the filing date. See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).The motion was actually filed on January 12, 2001. Because Belcher’s § 2255 motion was filed within one year after the date his conviction became final, the district court erred in dismissing the motion as untimely, and further erred in denying Belcher’s Rule 59(e) motionfor reconsideration in which he raised the timeliness issue. Accordingly, we grant a certificate of appealability, vacate the district court’s dismissal of Belcher’s § 2255 motion, vacate the district court’s denial of Belcher’s Rule 59(e) motion for reconsideration, and remand the case to the district court for consideration of Belcher’s § 2255 claims on the merits. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. VACATED AND REMANDED 2 U NITED S TATES v. B ELCHER
Exhibit 32Certification of Periodic Financial Report (Section 906 Certification)



Seon Hong Kim and Yong Hwa Kim hereby certify as follows:



1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of Center Financial Corporation.



2. The Form
10-K of Center Financial Corporation for the Year Ended December 31, 2003 complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Center Financial Corporation.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |                                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 29, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    SEON HONG KIM
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                      | 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Seon Hong Kim President & Chief Executive Officer           
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    YONG HWA KIM 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                      | 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Yong Hwa Kim Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5509 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5509

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Vinylbenzenesulfonic acid, sodium 
                             salt hydrate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Stivers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Vinylbenzenesulfonic acid, sodium 
                             salt hydrate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-VINYLBENZENESULFONIC ACID, SODIUM SALT HYDRATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        4-                  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Vinylbenzenesulfo                                                 12/31/2015
                          nic acid, sodium
                          salt hydrate (CAS
                          No. 2695-37-6)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2904.10.37)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 28, 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 00705

- CV

John E. Rodarte, Sr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Department of Family and Pro tective Services and

Judge Mary Roman, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON A ND ROSE

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

– OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on September 17, 2013. Having

reviewed the record , the Court holds that John E. Rodarte, Sr. has not prosecuted his appeal and

th at the appeal is therefore subject to dismissal. T he Cour t dismisses the appeal for want of

prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the

court below.
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|New Mexico--East Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|New Mexico--East Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 35     | 67     | W      | 93     | 156   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 115    | 2,124  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC, d/b/a

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT

Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00454

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00455

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00456

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00457

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00458

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00459

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00460

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00461

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00462

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00463

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00464

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00465

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF IRENE YANG IN SUPPORT OF 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS 

MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 6:20-cv-00455-ADA Document 30-1 Filed 10/23/20 Page 1 of 2
1

I, Irene Yang, declare as follows:

19. This declaration follows my earlier declaration dated October 2, 2020 in support 

of Microsoft’s Motion for Intra-District Transfer to the Austin Division of the Western District 

of Texas and picks up where the numbering in my last declaration left off. I have personal 

knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and, if called as a witness, could and would 

testify thereto.

20. Attached hereto as Exhibit 18 is a true and correct copy of a page from Plaintiff’s 

website, including more legible versions of the company bios previously included in Exhibit 6, 

last visited on October 21, 2020.

21. Attached hereto as Exhibit 19 is a true and correct copy of printouts from job 

listings posted on various websites, with highlighting added to indicate the date of each posting, 

last visited on October 19 and 20, 2020.

22. Attached hereto as Exhibit 20 is a true and correct copy of a printout from a 

Baylor University webpage, last visited on October 19, 2020. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on October 23, 2020 in San Francisco, California.

Irene Yang

Case 6:20-cv-00455-ADA Document 30-1 Filed 10/23/20 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC,

 Plaintiff

-vsDELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION,

 Defendants

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

6-20-CV-00404-ADA

ORDER TO DISMISS

Plaintiff filed a notice to voluntarily dismiss the above-captioned action without prejudice

in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). ECF No. 7. Defendants have not filed an 

answer or a motion for summary judgment in this matter. The Court hereby Orders that this case 

be DISMISSED.

SIGNED this 24th day of June, 2021.

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT**

** **

I,David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association,the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, News AmericaDebenture-Backed Series 2002-9 Trust****(the “Trust”),certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kin respect of the Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporationin respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report of theTrust;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, the information inthose reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the distributioninformation required to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholdersby the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement forinclusion in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

 

4.               I am responsible for reviewing theactivities performed by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similaragreement and based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, theTrustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

 
| Date: March 31, 2010           |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                                |   |
|                                |   |
| /s/ David J. Kolibachuk             |   |
| David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President |   |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C.§ 1350)**

 

In connection with the quarterly report ofSouthwest Water Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Cheryl L. Clary, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that:

 

1)              to my knowledge, theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 9, 2007 | /s/  CHERYL L. CLARY |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                    | Cheryl L. Clary           |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99

 

 

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I certify, to the best of my knowledge,that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 ofNorfolk Southern Railway Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Norfolk SouthernRailway Company.

 

 

                                  
| Signed: | /s/ David R. Goode                    |
|---------|---------------------------------------|
|    | David R. Goode                        |
|    | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|    | Norfolk Southern Railway Company      |

 

Dated: April 30, 2003

 

 

 

I certify, to the best of my knowledge,that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 ofNorfolk Southern Railway Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Norfolk SouthernRailway Company.

 

 

                                  
| Signed: | /s/ Henry C. Wolf                           |
|---------|---------------------------------------------|
|    | Henry C. Wolf                               |
|    | Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |
|    | Norfolk Southern Railway Company            |

 

Dated: April 30, 2003
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Group
Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Periodic Report), Raoul Tsakok, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

| | By: | /s/ Raoul Tsakok     
| | --- | ---------------------
| |     | Raoul Tsakok         
| |     | Chairman & CEO       
| |     |                      
| |     | Date: August 28, 2008

---
<PAGE>
                                                              EXHIBIT 23



                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference  of our report  included in this quarterly report on Form 
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997, of Southern California Edison
Company into the previously filed Registration Statements which follow:

     Registration Form      File No.         Effective Date
     -----------------      --------         --------------

         Form S-3           33-53288         November 6, 1992
         Form S-3           33-50251         September 21, 1993
         Form S-3           33-59001         May 15, 1995
         Form S-3          333-00497         February 2, 1996



                                     
                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Los Angeles, California
May 14, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25920]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Notice of Inventions Available for License

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of General Counsel.

ACTION: Notice of inventions available for license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy hereby announces that the following 
patents are available for license, in accordance with 37 USC 207-209: 
U.S. patent No. 5,114,690, entitled ``Two Stage Sorption of Sulfur 
Compounds;'' U.S. Patent No. 5,324,661, entitled ``Chemotactic 
Selection of Pollutant Degrading Soil Bacteria''; U.S. Patent No. 
5,384,048, entitled ``Bioremediation of Contaminated Groundwater''; and 
U.S. Patent No. 5,326,703, entitled ``Method of Degrading Pollutants in 
Soil.'' A copy of the patents may be obtained, for a modest fee, from 
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC 20231.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Marchick, Office of the 
Assistant General Counsel for Technology Transfer and Intellectual 
Property, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20585; Telephone (202) 586-2802.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 35 U.S.C. 207 authorizes licensing of 
Government-owned inventions. Implementing regulations are contained in 
37 CFR 404. 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1) authorizes exclusive licensing of 
Government-owned inventions under certain circumstances, provided that 
notice of the invention's availability for license has been announced 
in the Federal Register.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 3, 2000.
Paul A. Gottlieb,
Assistant General Counsel for Technology, Transfer and Intellectual 
Property.
[FR Doc. 00-25920 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Alston, Chafin and Senior Judge Haley

NEW BELL TRUCK LINES, INC. AND

GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY

MEMORANDUM OPINION *

v. Record No. 0499

- 16

- 2 PER CURIAM

JULY 12, 2016

DANNY JENKINS

FROM THE VIRGIN IA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Brandi R. Howell; Franklin & Prokopik, P.C.

, on brief )

, for

appellant s

.

( Seth R. Carroll; Commonwealth Law Group, LLC, on brief )

, for

appellee.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1

- 413, this opinion is not designated for publ ication. New Bell Truck Lines, Inc. and Great West Casualty Company (empl oyer) appeal a

decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) finding that Danny Jenkins

(claimant) was an employee of employer, finding that claimant suffered a compensable injury by

accident arising out of his employment, and awarding medi cal and disability benefits for his

compensable injuries. On appeal, employer contends the Commission erred in finding :

(1) claimant was an employee an d not an independent contractor; (2) claimant sustained a

compensable injury by accident that arose out of claimant’ s employment; and (3) employer is not

entitled to a credit for payments made to claimant through the Occupational Accident disability

policy. We ha ve reviewed the record and the C ommission’s opinion and find that this appeal is

without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the C ommission in its final

opinion. See Jenkins v. New Bell Truck Lines, Inc. , VWC File No. VA02000018290 ( Feb. 25, UNPUBLISHED- 2

-

2016 ). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1

- 403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed

.