UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

United States of America

vs.

David Thomas Steinbach (14)

§

§

§

§

§

NO. 1:20-CR-47-RP-14

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

TO: THE HONORABLE ROBERT PITMAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Magistrate Judge submits this Report and Recommendation to the District Court 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). The District Court referred this case to the United States 

Magistrate Judge for the taking of the defendant’s felony guilty plea and for his allocution 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11.

On May 2, 2022, the defendant and counsel appeared before the Magistrate Judge. Counsel 

were admonished as required by the Due Process Protection Act. The undersigned addressed the 

defendant personally in open court, informed him of the admonishments under Rule 11 of the 

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and determined that he understood those admonishments.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, the defendant pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute 

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C). 

The Magistrate Judge finds the following:

1. The defendant, with the advice of his attorney, consented to enter this guilty plea 

before the Magistrate Judge, subject to final approval and sentencing by the District 

Judge;

2. The defendant fully understands the nature of the charge against him and possible 

penalties;

Case 1:20-cr-00047-RP Document 649 Filed 05/02/22 Page 1 of 2
3. The defendant understands his constitutional and statutory rights, understands that his

constitutional and statutory rights can be waived, and understands the meaning and 

effect of the waiver of his constitutional and statutory rights;

4. The defendant waived prosecution by indictment;

5. The defendant’s plea was made freely and voluntarily;

6. The defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; and

7. There is a factual basis for this plea. 

RECOMMENDATION

The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the District Court accept the defendant’s guilty 

plea and, after reviewing the presentence investigation report, enter a Final Judgment of guilt 

against him.

WARNING

The parties may file objections to this Report and Recommendation. A party filing objections 

must specifically identify those findings or recommendations to which objections are being 

made. The District Court need not consider frivolous, conclusive, or general objections. See

Battle v. United States Parole Comm’n, 834 F.2d 419, 421 (5th Cir. 1987). A party’s failure to 

file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations contained within this 

Report within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Report shall bar that party 

from de novo review by the District Court of the proposed findings and recommendations and, 

except on grounds of plain error, shall bar the party from appellate review of proposed factual 

findings and legal conclusions accepted by the District Court to which no objections were filed. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-53, 106 S. Ct. 466, 472-74 

(1985); Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

SIGNED on May 2, 2022.

SUSAN HIGHTOWER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cr-00047-RP Document 649 Filed 05/02/22 Page 2 of 2