alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 10.4I



                              September 18, 1998



Mr. Peter J. Moerbeek
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Southwest Water Company
225 North Barranca Avenue, Suite 200
West Covina, California 91791
 

               Re: Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
                   -------------------------------------

Dear Mr. Moerbeek:

          Reference is hereby made to that certain Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of December 23, 1997 (the "Credit Agreement") between
                                              ----------------          
Southwest Water Company, a Delaware corporation ("Borrower"), and Wells Fargo
                                                  --------                   
Bank, National Association ("Bank").  Pursuant to Section 6.02(h) of the Credit
                             ----                                              
Agreement, Borrower has asked that Bank consent to an advance by Borrower to the
City of Sunland Park, New Mexico ("Sunland Park") in an amount not to exceed One
                                   ------------                                 
Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,800,000).  Bank hereby consents to
such advance, provided, however (a) no Event of Default has occurred and is
              --------  -------                                            
continuing, (b)such advance shall not exceed One Million Eight Hundred Thousand
Dollars ($1,800,000), (c) Sunland Park shall enter into a management agreement
with ECO Resources, Inc., a subsidiary of Borrower, (the "ECO - Sunland Park
                                                         -------------------
Agreement") and (d) Borrower agrees to immediately notify Bank of any payment
---------                                                                    
defaults by Sunland Park under the ECO - Sunland Park Agreement.

          The foregoing consent is not a continuing consent, and Bank does not
hereby amend the various terms and provisions of the Credit Agreement and shall
be free to exercise any and all of its various rights and remedies under the
Credit Agreement upon the conditions set forth therein.
<PAGE>
 
Southwest Water Company
September 18, 1998
Page 2 of 2


          Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by signing in the
space provided below.

 

Very Truly Yours,

WELLS FARGO BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


/s/ RANDALL J. REPP
-------------------
Randall J. Repp
Vice President



ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

SOUTHWEST WATER COMPANY,
A DELAWARE CORPORATION


/s/ PETER J. MOERBEEK
---------------------
Peter J. Moerbeek
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


/s/ STEPHEN J. MUZI
---------------------
Stephen J. Muzi
Corporate Controller
Dea r Si r o r ^adan) , Fetorua. ^ \± , aci l 5lc)i - a + •Reoi^a nN^ti^na l Hwor ^ Via

s recentl y b€-^

n5.tlflesi|"[<f<iiNi

^ b e •tulcE naioo u i n Kpril - 1 ^nn re^e5tin< i iViey b e arani^ d^-'6lo + una-e r cv n eyevvip-iiov

i rul e (pocK<

+ Wo . t^AN-Ioil-oo^'t) . X V\tf».v e b€-e nvASin P^tAv ^ Countr y - b -Fl

y horvi e -frt. mD

C -t o Avo dcos^ - €ffid€v\+ . rAAin

u othev - •people inf^^eKnq-frTYv i IOA-T H ~hoo5d"liA/rCo^AfHr y "ov^er^o-tvier " <XirTiFTB''fbr -tine5e " n!a5<5n5"~ ~ a s wCU . Iv i l\€i

A o f curren t €<:6norA'\(

i issue s i n tvi e 5+citr

ofpossibl e ^i " tJW^iioeSSeS , S+uden+S ; d6lle^ e ^cKl-tv , ^^"'^ j ^" ^ Mic^laan S CApi> l t o e'asil u ir3iv€ l t D ou r nation s capital , LAminci,micWicja nar e importsn + +z > M ^ pfvsoTcili u butal^z r —h^ve-^w-e^onmi c \^portr<v^6 t <^ 5 ujgil - P'Tgi5g^t?nsi'de r L^nsinet' s ftoK\c5yvik

develc5pmen + uoHe nmaKiii ^ ym r dea'S7"o n <A^o^ ^ S mCmn^' S ^lo + ^ + ^ea^ay ^ h)aiio^c \Mrpoy^ , SwhCown+Y V laa s -Fi6uo nApprby(yv7a-tcl u 60,00 6 pa_55en<^er s o niy\i 5 rou{.\

€ ^i^c e r€C€\v\y] a-noet r

S(o + a ^ R« ^ N^-fiOKu

l < A510 + a + mqa nN^om l sd

. ^c, + -fines e fif-^nt ^ t-^i

H S+^l l b e ^^.aOAb)e . TVi^n

K CJCO Afz^ r ^oA^idennq-tn^ f

idea s ^5y<7

M mdK e y^ r dirdsi'ov i c^^oix i Sai o 6^mry . Sf^weiu , 3^ 1 fr 5t5vv'*6i H
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

NCS MULTISTAGE INC.,

 Plaintiff,

§

§

§

§

vs. §

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-00277-ADA

NINE ENERGY SERVICE, INC.,

 

 Defendant.

§

§

§

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSED MOTION TO STRIKE

Before the Court is Plaintiff NCS Multistage Inc.’s Opposed Motion to Strike Defendant 

Nine Energy Service, Inc.’s (“Nine”) Preliminary Invalidity Contentions. Having considered the 

parties’ briefings, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion. 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Nine’s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions are stricken. 

Nine is ordered to re-serve Preliminary Invalidity Contentions within 7 days of this Order. 

SIGNED this ______ day of September, 2020

_____________________________

ALAN D. ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 31-2 Filed 09/16/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 12(b)

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Union Pacific Railroad Company and Consolidated Subsidiary Companies

(Unaudited)



|                                                          |  |                          |   |  |          |  
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | - |  | -------- | -
|                                                          |  | Six Months EndedJune 30, |  
|Millions of Dollars, Except for Ratios                    |  | 2007                     |   |  | 2006     |  
|Fixed charges:                                            |  |                          |   |  |          |  
|Interest expense, including amortization of debt discount |  | $    223                 |   |  | $    250 |  
|Portion of rentals representing an interest factor        |  | 119                      |   |  | 117      |  
|Total fixed charges                                       |  | $    342                 |   |  | $    367 |  
|Earnings available for fixed charges:                     |  |                          |   |  |          |  
|Net income                                                |  | $    832                 |   |  | $    682 |  
|Equity earnings net of distribution                       |  | (31                      | ) |  | (29      | )
|Income taxes                                              |  | 480                      |   |  | 418      |  
|Fixed charges                                             |  | 342                      |   |  | 367      |  
|Earnings available for fixed charges                      |  | $1,623                   |   |  | $1,438   |  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        |  | 4.7                      |   |  | 3.9      |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                              28,151
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      408,524
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        169,632
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   541,016
<PP&E>                                           5,189,473
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,724,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,775,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              719,825
<BONDS>                                            837,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           111,402
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,463,391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,775,007
<SALES>                                            583,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   746,580
<CGS>                                              460,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      482,605
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    85,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24,084
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    112,551
<INCOME-TAX>                                        37,102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 75,449
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        75,449
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .68
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 543 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 543

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for payments in lieu 
       of taxes for certain Department of Homeland Security land.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2011

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for payments in lieu 
       of taxes for certain Department of Homeland Security land.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT FOR DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY PROJECTS.

    Section 6901(1) of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (G), by striking ``or'' after the 
        semicolon at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (H), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(I) that is administered by the Secretary of 
                Homeland Security and at which individuals or goods are 
                examined for entry into the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### GALLOWAY v. STATE.

No. 25972.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 29, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for felony theft, with punishment assessed at five years in the penitentiary.

The record is without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
#### 974 Realty Corp., Appellant, *v.*Victoria Ledford, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

October 31, 1957.

*241
      *Emanuel Strauss*for appellant.

*Mario J. Aquino*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Landlord presented a prima facie case on its petition that tenant violated a substantial obligation of her tenancy by repeated and unjustified refusal to pay her rent, when due, which necessitated 30 separate summary proceedings for nonpayment. Furthermore, 10-day notice to cure, required by subdivision 1 of section 52 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations, is inapplicable to a situation, such as here, where there has been a contrived course of conduct of nonpayment of rent, payable in advance, which necessitated resort by the landlord to summary proceedings on 30 separate occasions *(Gilbert*v. *Becker,*142 N. Y. S. 2d 888; *Sanfilippo*v. *Coster,*91 N. Y. S. 2d 738, appeal dismissed 100 N. Y. S. 2d 144; *Beals*v. *Wideman*[App. Term, First Dept.], N. Y. L. J., April 12, 1957, p. 6, col. 5, motion for leave to appeal to Appellate Division denied N. Y. L. J., May 8, 1957, p. 6, col. 3).

The final order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs.

Hofstadter, Aurelio and Tilzee, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee At, Public Law (92-463) announcement is made of the next meeting of the Inland Waterways Users Board. The meeting will be held on November 3, 2000, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Doubletree Hotel—Pittsburgh at Liberty Center, 1000 Penn Avenue, adjacent to the convention center (Tel. (412) 281-3700). Registration will begin at 9 am and the                               ( print page 58058)                            meeting is scheduled to adjourn at 4 pm. The meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the committee at the time and in the manner permitted by the committee.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Norman T. Edwards, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CECW-PD, Washington, DC 20314-1000.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Gregory D. Showalter,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-24834  Filed 9-26-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
Exhibit 3.2



|DEAN HELLER                         
|------------------------------------
|Secretary of State                  
|204 North Carson Street, Suite 1    
|Carson City, Nevada 89701-4069      
|(775) 684-5708                      
|Website: secretaryofstate.biz       
|                                    
|                                    
|Certificate of Amendment            
|(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78, 390)
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY  



Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
                  For Nevada Profit Corporation



1.	Name of corporation:

2.	The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if available):

Article Five of the Articles of Incorporation has been amended to read as follows:  The total number of shares of
common stock which this Corporation is authorized to issue is Three Hundred Million (300,000,000) shares of Common Stock having a par value of
$0.001 per share and Two Hundred Million (200,000,000) shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001 per share.

The Preferred Stock, or any series thereof, shall have such designations, preferences, and relative, participating, optional or other special rights
and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof as shall be expressed in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issue of such stock
adopted by the board of directors and may be made dependent upon facts ascertainable outside such resolution or resolutions of the board of
directors, provided that the matter in which such facts shall operate upon such designations, preferences, rights and qualifications, limitations or
restrictions of such class or series of stock is clearly and expressly set forth in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issuance of such stock
by the board of directors.

3.	The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exercise
at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series,
or as may be required by the provisions of the* articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: 94%

4.	Effective date of filing (optional):

5.	Office Signature (required):

* If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative or other right
given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote otherwise
required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless of
limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.

IMPORTANT:



|This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees. | Nevada Secretary of State AM 38,385 Amend 2003
|-------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harold Rammelkamp, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, *561J.), rendered October 24, 1988, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of depraved indifference murder beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence established that the defendant went to a bar with an unlicensed gun and, knowing it was loaded, removed it from its holster and displayed it, while holding his finger on the trigger. When the defendant and the bartender struggled to gain control of the weapon *(see, People v Languena,*129 AD2d 587), it discharged four times *(see, People v Fenner,*61 NY2d 971), the first two shots going astray, but the latter two inflicting the wounds which were responsible for the bartender’s death. The defendant then fled from the bar without summoning medical aid *(see, People v Kanelos,*107 AD2d 764), and hid the gun in a crawl space in his father’s apartment building. The jury was thus entitled to find that the defendant created a grave risk of the bartender’s death and caused his death under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life *(see,*Penal Law § 125.25 [2]; *People v Roe,*74 NY2d 20; *People v Licitra,*47 NY2d 554; *People v Watson,*156 AD2d 403; *People v Languena, supra).*

The defendant’s challenge to the court’s refusal to charge criminally negligent homicide *(see,*Penal Law § 125.10) as a lesser included offense of murder in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 125.25 [2]) is foreclosed by reason of the jury’s verdict finding him guilty of murder in the second degree, the crime alleged in the indictment, and its implicit rejection of the charged lesser-included offenses of first and second degree manslaughter *(see, People v Boettcher,*69 NY2d 174, 180; *People v Kanelos, supra).*

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including the one raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Harwood, J. P., Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 514 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.514

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
            the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven

                                 An Act

 
    To extend expiring provisions of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and 
   Reauthorization Act of 2005 and Intelligence Reform and Terrorism 
     Prevention Act of 2004 relating to access to business records, 
 individual terrorists as agents of foreign powers, and roving wiretaps 
                         until December 8, 2011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``FISA Sunsets Extension Act of 
2011''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUNSETS OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO ACCESS TO 
BUSINESS RECORDS, INDIVIDUAL TERRORISTS AS AGENTS OF FOREIGN POWERS, 
AND ROVING WIRETAPS.
    (a) USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005.--
Section 102(b)(1) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization 
Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-177; 50 U.S.C. 1805 note, 50 U.S.C. 1861 
note, and 50 U.S.C. 1862 note) is amended by striking ``February 28, 
2011'' and inserting ``May 27, 2011''.
    (b) Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.--
Section 6001(b)(1) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention 
Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458; 118 Stat. 3742; 50 U.S.C. 1801 note) 
is amended by striking ``February 28, 2011'' and inserting ``May 27, 
2011''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
----

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Niebüll) — Standesamt Stadt Niebüll v Stefan Grunkin, Dorothee Regina Paul

(Case C-96/04) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Determination of a child's surname - Procedure to transfer that determination to one of the parents - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2006/C 143/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Niebüll

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Standesamt Stadt Niebüll

Defendant: Stefan Grunkin, Dorothee Regina Paul

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Amtsgericht Niebüll — Interpretation of Articles 12 EC and 18 EC — Interpretation of the principles of Community law relating to European citizenship and freedom of movement of persons — Minor child born and residing in one Member State and having the nationality of another Member State — Application in the latter Member State for the mother's name to be joined to that of the father — Refusal

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice of the European Communities has no jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Amtsgericht Niebüll in its decision of 2 June 2003.

----

(1)OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

----