alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster 
                    #
                    3299]
 As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on September 26, 2000, I find that Greene County, Ohio constitutes a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and a tornado that occurred on September 20, 2000. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on November 25, 2000 and for economic injury until the close of business on June 26, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308. In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in the contiguous counties of Clark, Clinton, Fayette, Madison, Montgomery, and Warren in the State of Ohio may be filed until the specified date at the above location. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners with credit available elsewhere
7.375Homeowners without credit available elsewhere
3.687Businesses with credit available elsewhere
8.000Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere
4.000Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit Available elsewhere
6.750For Economic Injury:Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere
4.000
 The numbers assigned to this disaster are 329911 for physical damage and 9J1500 for economic injury. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) Dated: September 28, 2000. Herbert L. Mitchell, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 00-25796 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5404 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5404

        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Clomazone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Ms. Hochul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Clomazone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLOMAZONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.21 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Clomazone) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00454-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00455-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00456-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00457-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00458-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00459-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00460-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00461-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00462-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00463-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00464-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00465-ADA

PATENT CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

Having considered Defendant’s motion to transfer venue to the Austin Division and the 

briefing related to it, the Court finds the motion should be DENIED. The motion is hereby 

DENIED.

Date: 

Judge Alan Albright

Case 6:20-cv-00455-ADA Document 28-2 Filed 10/16/20 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                        
|                                                                                                     
|Utah Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                     
|Utah Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 365    | 441    | 669    | 1,278 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,567  | 1,578  | 1,202  | 983    | 1,263  | 1,457  | 2,118  | 2,439  | 2,799  | 2,110 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,476  | 3,646  | 3,573  | 3,100  | 2,837  | 821    | 950    | 800    | 427    | 147   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 495    | 886    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

SAM MAVERICK SPIRITS, LLC,

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,

v.

ALAMO PREMIUM DISTILLERY, INC. 

d/b/a ALAMO DISTILLING COMPANY,

Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff, and 

Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

KENNETH MAVERICK and MAVERICK 

WHISKEY, LLC,

Third-Party Defendants.

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Civil No. SA-20-cv-00333-OLG

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE

On February 23, 2021, the parties’ counsel notified the Court that the parties had settled 

this case in mediation. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSES this case 

pending the filing of dismissal papers. The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to close this case upon 

entry of this Order. If the parties wish to reopen this case, they may do so by filing a motion to 

reopen.

It is so ORDERED.

Signed this day of March, 2021.

ORLANDO L. GARCIA 

Chief United States District Judge

26th

FILED

DEPUTY 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BY: ________________________________ March 26, 2021

 JU

Case 5:20-cv-00333-OLG Document 22 Filed 03/26/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 

Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 48-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 48-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 48-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 3 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 48-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 4 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 48-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 5 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 48-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 6 of 6
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

AUDREY DUFF, 

Plaintiff,

v.

BETTY BEWLEY,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CAUSE NO. 1:20-CV-00375-RP

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

Defendant Betty Bewley recently filed an unopposed Motion to Compel Compliance 

with a Third-Party Subpoena. A true and correct copy of that Motion was served on the third 

party in question, Doug Duff, but he did not respond. As a result, the Court granted the 

Motion to Compel. 

Given the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that third party Doug Duff provide the 

following documents to Defendant on or before March 12, 2021: 

1. All of his communications with Audrey Duff related to Betty Bewley from 2017 to

the present.

2. All of his communications with Audrey Duff related to this lawsuit, including

communications related to the underlying state court lawsuit.

3. All of his communications with Audrey Duff’s counsel, including but not limited to

any lawyers at Grissom & Thompson, related to Betty Bewley from 2017 to the

present.

4. All of his communications with Audrey Duff’s counsel, including but not limited to

any lawyers at Grissom & Thompson, related to the lawsuit, including

communications related to the underlying state court lawsuit.

5. All of his communications with any third party related to Betty Bewley from 2017

to the present.

6. All of Mr. Duff’s phone records reflecting text messages and/or calls with Audrey

Duff from 2017 to the present.

Case 1:20-cv-00375-RP Document 29 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 2
2

7. All of Mr. Duff’s phone records reflecting calls and/or text messages with Audrey

Duff’s counsel, including but not limited to any lawyers at Grissom & Thompson,

from 2017 to the present.

8. All documents and communications that reflect any allegation that Mr. Duff engaged

in any sexual and/or inappropriate relationship with Audrey Duff.

9. All communications exchanged between Mr. Duff and Audrey Duff regarding any

text messages exchanged between Mr. Duff and Betty Bewley in May 2018.

10. All communications exchanged with Audrey Duff or any other person regarding any

false statements made by Betty Bewley about Audrey Duff.

SIGNED on the ____ of ____________, 2021.

_________________________

HON. ROBERT PITMAN

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

5th March

Case 1:20-cv-00375-RP Document 29 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 2
|                                  |             | Exhibit 99(a) 
|--------------------------------- | ----------- | --------------
|Household Finance Corporation     |             |               
|Household Automotive Trust 2002-1 |             |               
|                                  |             |               
|                                  |             |               
|Original Principal Class A        |             |               
|Class A-1                         | 229,000,000 |               
|Class A-2                         | 267,000,000 |               
|Class A-3                         | 286,000,000 |               
|Class A-4                         | 218,000,000 |               
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)   |             |               
|Class A-1                         | 229,000     |               
|Class A-2                         | 267,000     |               
|Class A-3                         | 286,000     |               
|Class A-4                         | 218,000     |               
|                                  |             |               
|                                  |             |               
|                                  |             | 2003 Totals   
|                                  |             |               
|                                  |             |               
|CLASS A                           |             |               
|Class A-1 Principal Distribution  |             | 26,710,159.48 
|Class A-1 Interest Distribution   |             | 47,382.89     
|                                  |             |               
|Class A-2 Principal Distribution  |             | 267,000,000.00
|Class A-2 Interest Distribution   |             | 4,046,193.61  
|                                  |             |               
|Class A-3 Principal Distribution  |             | 2,851,299.58  
|Class A-3 Interest Distribution   |             | 10,725,000.00 
|                                  |             |               
|Class A-4 Principal Distribution  |             | 0.00          
|Class A-4 Interest Distribution   |             | 9,570,200.04
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Citadel Broadcasting Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy L. Taylor, Vice President-Finance and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)    the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
March 16, 2004

| |  |  | /s/RANDY L. TAYLORRandy L. Taylor
Vice PresidentFinance and Secretary
| |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Citadel Broadcasting Corporation and will be retained by Citadel Broadcasting Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul Pompeit, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New *221York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.), rendered May 15, 1989, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of six years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the court coerced him into pleading guilty has no merit. The court did not abuse its authority by denying defendant’s request for one more week to consider the outstanding plea offer. Defendant acknowledged that he was pleading guilty voluntarily and admitted his guilt; nor did defendant move to withdraw the plea prior to sentence. *(People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662.)

The negotiated sentence imposed on defendant was not an abuse of discretion. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302.) Defendant admitted a serious crime, and his prior criminal record is not insignificant. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5346 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5346

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Macroporous 
                         poly(divinylbenzene).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

    Mr. Dold (for himself and Mr. Young of Indiana) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Macroporous 
                         poly(divinylbenzene).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MACROPOROUS POLY(DIVINYLBENZENE).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.11 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Macroporous 
poly(divinylbenzene)) is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5049 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5049

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sector molds and tooling.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Duncan of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sector molds and tooling.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SECTOR MOLDS AND TOOLING.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Sector molds and    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          tooling certified                                                 12/31/2015
                          for use in
                          production of
                          very large
                          radial,
                          ``earthmover''
                          tires, designed
                          for off-the-
                          highway use,
                          primarily in
                          commercial mining
                          and oil sands
                          extraction
                          operations tires
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8480.79.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### CURRIE et ux. v. HERGOTZ et al.

No. 10062.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

June 18, 1952.

Rehearing Denied July 2, 1952.

Ayers K. Ross, Horace H. Shelton, Austin, for appellants.

John C. Butler, Austin, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment in this case was that Agnes Hergotz, William A, Hergotz, Adeline Hergotz Sedgwick, Nora Hergotz Gaddy and Fannie Hergotz Templeton, appellees, recover of and from appellants, Dr. R. F. Currie and wife, Lillie Dale Currie, the title to and possession of the West 6.6 feet of Lot No. Seven, Block No. Four (4) of the Harrington Addition, in Outlot No. Seventeen, in Division “O” of the City of Austin, describing the same by metes and bounds.

Trial was without a jury. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were made and filed by the trial judge.

No statement of facts has been filed in this Court.

Appellants only compliant is that appel-lees did not establish by a preponderance of the testimony their plea of adverse possession of the above tract of land for a period of ten years.

Obviously it is impossible for us to appraise the preponderance of the evidence when the evidence is not 'before us.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law filed by the trial court and not excepted to by' appellants, fully support the judgment.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.'
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5418 

To suspend temporarily the duty on lithium-ion batteries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. HONDA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on lithium-ion batteries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Lithium-ion batteries (provided for in subheading 

8507.60.00) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5418 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

JOSEFINE KILUNDU, § 

PETITIONER, § 

§ 

V. § 

§ 

CHARLOTTE COLLINS, ET AL., § 

RESPONDENTS. § 

2020 MAY I I PM 3: 39 

CAUSE NO. 1:20-CV-476-LY 

ORDER CLOSING CASE 

Before the court is the above-styled and numbered cause. On May 8, 2020, Petitioner 

Josefine Kilundu filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. #3) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 

IT IS ORDERED that the case is hereby CLOSED. 

SIGNED this day of May, 2020. 

UN ED STATE DIST CT JUDGE