alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>                                    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY
                                            FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
                                            FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE
                                            30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
                                            ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                                            FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000090045
<NAME>                                      PARAGON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000


<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      6,769
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               9,048
<ALLOWANCES>                                62
<INVENTORY>                                 2,684
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,702
<PP&E>                                      10,340
<DEPRECIATION>                              7,089
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,231
<BONDS>                                     14,826
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    4,185
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,144
<SALES>                                     35,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,033
<CGS>                                       26,085
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             2,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                1,033
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,557
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                1,557
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .36


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

DROPBOX, INC., 

Plaintiff/CounterDefendant, 

v. 

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Defendant/CounterPlaintiff. 

 

Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-00251-ADA 

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DROPBOX, INC., 

Defendant. 

 

Civil Action No.: 6:21-cv-758-ADA 

NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION TO FILE REDACTIONS 

Dropbox, Inc. hereby notifies the Court that the parties have agreed to extend the deadline 

to file redactions to their March 17, 2023 responses to dispositive and Daubert motions. See Dkt. 

Nos. 235-240 (Dropbox, Inc.’s Responses) and Dkt. Nos. 241, 243-245, 247 (Motion Offense, 

LLC’s Responses). The parties have agreed to extend the current March 24, 2023 deadline to file 

redacted, public versions by two business-days to March 28, 2023. All other deadlines will remain 

in effect. 

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 248 Filed 03/24/23 Page 1 of 3
2

March 24, 2023 

/s/ Kelly Ransom 

Kelly Ransom 

Texas State Bar No. 24109427 

KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP 

303 Colorado, Suite 2000 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Tel: (512) 495-6464 

Kelly.ransom@kellyhart.com 

Gregory H. Lantier 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

& DORR LLP 

2100 Pennsylvania Avenue 

Washington DC 20037 

Tel: (202) 663-6327 

gregory.lantier@wilmerhale.com 

Liv Herriot 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

& DORR LLP 

2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400 

Palo Alto, California 94306 

Tel: (650) 858-6138 

liv.herriot@wilmerhale.com 

Attorneys for Dropbox, Inc. 

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 248 Filed 03/24/23 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that all counsel of record are being served with a copy of the foregoing 

document via the Court’s CM/ECF system on March 24, 2023. 

 /s/ Kelly Ransom 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 248 Filed 03/24/23 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC

vs.

DROPBOX INC

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00251-ADA

LIST OF WITNESSES

FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANT

1. Robert Paul Morris 1. Jason Terk

2. Andrew Gordon 2. Maxime Lareabie-Belanger

3. Pearl Shu via deposition 3. Phillip Gibbons

4. Deborah Holstein via

deposition

4. Pranesh Pandurangan via

deposition

5. Robert Akl 5. Kevin Zilka via video

deposition

6. Stephen Dell 6. Patrick Caldwell via video

deopsition

7. Robert Akl - recalled 7. Micahel Shamos

8. 8.

9. 9.

10. 10.

11. 11.

12. 12.

13. 13.

14. 14.

15. 15.

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 383 Filed 05/19/23 Page 1 of 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5253 

To suspend temporarily the duty on reaction product of 3,5-dimethyl-1,2- 

diazole with polymer of hexane-1,6-diyl diisocyanate in organic solvent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on reaction product of 

3,5-dimethyl-1,2-diazole with polymer of hexane-1,6-diyl 

diisocyanate in organic solvent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REACTION PRODUCT OF 3,5-DIMETHYL-1,2-DIA4 ZOLE WITH POLYMER OF HEXANE-1,6-DIYL 

5 DIISOCYANATE IN ORGANIC SOLVENT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5253 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Reaction product of 3,5-dimethyl-1,2-diazole with 

polymer of hexane-1,6-diyl 

diisocyanate (CAS No. 

163206–31–3), in organic 

solvent (provided for in 

subheading 3911.90.90) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Standard Motor Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence I. Sills, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/S/ LAWRENCE I. SILLS
---------------------
Lawrence I. Sills
Chief Executive Officer
November 6, 2008


* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Standard Motor Products, Inc. and will be retained by Standard Motor
Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.11

                                    Schedule

                  Information on seven substantially identical
                                 Deeds of Trust
                            dated as of June 20, 2001
                  with First Union National Bank as Beneficiary

      (Seven additional documents are identical, except as set forth below,
                    to the document included as Exhibit 4.3)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           Principal Amount
        Apartment Property                  Grantor                         of Debt Secured
        ------------------                  -------                         ---------------
        <S>                                 <C>                            <C>
        Deerfield Apartments                CRIT-NC IV, LLC                      10,220,000
        Durham, North Carolina

        Meadow Creek Apartments             CRIT-NC IV, LLC                       9,590,000
        Pineville, North Carolina

        Pinnacle Ridge Apartments           CRIT-NC IV, LLC                       5,005,000
        Asheville, North Carolina

        Cottonwood Crossing Apartments      CAC V Limited Partnership             6,055,000
        Arlington, Texas

        Main Park Apartments                CAC V Limited Partnership             8,465,000
        Duncanville, Texas

        Paces Cove Apartments               CAC V Limited Partnership            11,165,000
        Dallas, Texas

        Wildwood Apartments                 CAC V Limited Partnership             3,400,000
        Eucless, Texas
</TABLE>
1 IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

DANIEL VADNAIS

V. NO. 03

- 14

- 00578

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

APPELLANT’S THIRD MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Daniel Vadnais , by and through his attorney of record, Dal

Ruggles , and files this

, his Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief , and

in support thereof would show the Court the following:

I.

That the above styled and numbered cause is styled The State of Texas v.

Daniel Vadnais, Cause Number CR

- 13

- 0651 in the 2 2 nd Judic ial District Court of

Hays County, Texas. Appel la nt was sentenced on August 13 , 2014

.

II.

Appellant was convicted on one count of Fraudulent Use or Possession of

Identifying Information

. Punishment was assessed at ten (1 0) years

imprisonment

.

III.

Appellant’s notic e of appeal was filed on August 28, 2014 and a motion for ACCEPTED 03-14-00578-CR 4721799 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/1/2015 9:43:43 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2 new trial was filed on September 11 , 2014

. T he clerk’s record and reporter ’ s

record were file d on December 11, 2014 . The due date for the brief is

Wednesday, April 1 , 2015

.

IV.

This is Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file his brief.

Appellant re spectfully requests a thirty day extension of time to file the brief,

which would make su ch brief due on Friday, May 1 , 2015

.

V.

The undersigned attorney has been unable to complete the brief due t o lack

of time. Counsel has completed his review of the record and the research

associated with several legal issues in his case and is the process of drafting his

brief. He has not been able to devote sufficient time to complete the final draft

however due to a demandin g workload that includes numerous cases and

appeals in several counties. Counsel is currently working on four felony

appeals, two of which are due within the next week, and one misdemeanor

appeal that will possibly require a hearing on a motion for new tri al. Counsel’s

active caseload beyond appellant work includes approximately thirty

- five cases

in three different counties. For this reason the undersigned attorney asks that

this extension be granted so that he may devote the additional time necessary to

effectively represent Appellant and so that justice may be done in this case.3 Respectfully Submitted,

_/s/

_ Dal Ruggles_

_______ _________ DAL RUGGLES Attorney at Law 1103 Nueces St. Austin, Texas 78701 Phone: (512) 477

- 7991 Facsimile : (512) 477

- 3580 SBN: 24041834 Email: dal@ruggleslaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Dal Ruggles , hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing

Appellant’s Third Motion for Extension of Time to Brief was e

- served to Ms.

Kathleen Magee Arnold of the Hays County District Att orney's Office on this the

1 st day of April , 2015

.
_/s/

_ Dal Ruggles_

___________ DAL RUGGLES
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5289 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chloro-1,8-naphthalic anhydride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. ROE of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chloro-1,8-naphthalic 

anhydride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-CHLORO-1,8-NAPHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4-Chloro-1,8-naphthalic 

anhydride, (CAS No. 

4053–08–1) (provided for 

in subheading 2917.39.30) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5289 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
cq 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: leanne bula [zurichny@hotmail.com1 

', .. Sent: Sat~rday, February 13, 2010 8:15 AM , To: Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Subject: cape air 

Dear sTr,'., 

I am writing to you to express my frustration with the local legislatures decision to abandon Cape Air for 

Colgan. I have flown Cape Air numerous times since its arrival in Plattsburgh. I have always found 

extremely competitive rates. The airlines competitive rates are what caught my eye in the first place. I 

was able to fly to Boston less expensively than if I drove (tolls, gas, and hotel garage fees). The staff was 

always extremely curteous and professional. The size of the plane while small was comfortable for a quick 

45 miriute flight. All the flights I was on were full or nearly full. However, I was always able to purchase 

my tickets last minute. The flights I took were always on time or even early! 

After watching the PBS Frontline documentary, I am even more convinced that Cape Air not Colgan is the 

right choice for Plattsburgh. Colgan's record of safety, cost cutting incentives, and response to the horrific 

crash in Buffalo make it clear that customer satisfaction and more importantly safety are not number one. 

Getting the airplane to the next gate no questions asked is their primary concern. Cape Air's reliability . 

and impeccable safety record are most important to me. 

I was planning to take my husband and young children to Boston to experience the wonderful museums. 

We will be driving if Colgan Air is in place at the Plattsburgh airport. I am not willing to give my business 

to a company that treats its employees unfairly and provides little regard for the safety of their employees 

or their customers. 

I urge you to reconsider the legislatures decision and reconsider Cape Air for providing air service from 

Plattsburgh NY to Boston. It. is in the best interest of those who fly and the Plattsburgh Airport's future. 

Sincerely, 

Leanne Bula 

Chazy, NY 

Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. 

1,
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

34 36 38 40 42 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/10 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 10 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.56 N 76.20 WMeters AGL
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5120 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5120

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on calcium chloride 
                          phosphate phosphor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Huelskamp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on calcium chloride 
                          phosphate phosphor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CALCIUM CHLORIDE PHOSPHATE PHOSPHOR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.72 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to calcium chloride phosphate 
phosphor) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Klamath Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on October 11, 2000, at the Northern California Service Center, Training Room 1, 6101 Airport Road, Redding, California. The meeting will start at 9 A.M. and adjourn at 5 P.M. Agenda items for the meeting include: (1) Discussion on topics of general interest to the PAC (Implementation Monitoring Field Trips); (2) the President's Fire and Fuels Report; (3) Socio-Economic Issues: and (4) Public Comment Periods. All Provincial Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Connie Hendryx, USDA, Klamath National Forest, 11263 N. Hwy 3, Fort Jones, California 96032; telephone 530-468-1281 (voice), TDD 530-468-2783.

Dated: September 27, 2000.

Constance J. Hendryx,

PAC Support Staff.

[FR Doc. 00-25385 Filed 10-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### Ex parte PRINCE.

No. 24486.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 22, 1949.

On Motion for Rehearing Oct. 19, 1949.

Fred Whitaker and Thomas A. Bank-head, Carthage, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant is under indictment for the murder of his wife. Upon his application, bail was refused, pending trial. The appeal is. from that order. ■

It is the policy of this court in cases of this character not to state the facts at length. It is sufficient here to say that from the record before us appellant’s guilt of the crime charged depends upon his written confession.

The admissions of the officers who had appellant in custody and to whom the confession was made are such as to substantially raise a fact question as to the admissibility of the confession. The length of time appellant was questioned and the different places to which he was carried are, under the circumstances shown, such that a jury would be warranted in concluding that the confession was not voluntary — all of which is shown by the State’s testimony, as the appellant did not testify.

Such being true, we cannot say that the record before its shows a capital offense upon proof evident, within the meaning of Art. 1, Sec. 11, of the Constitution of this State, Vernon’s Ann.St.

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and bail is fixed at the sum of Seventy-five Hundred Dollars.

GRAVES, Judge.

I dissent from the allowance of bail.

Opinion approved by a majority of the court.

On Motion for Rehearing

GRAVES, Judge.

The District Attorney representing the State in this cause filed a motion for a rehearing herein within the time allowed by *242law, and later filed an instrument in writing requesting the privilege of withdrawing such motion.

The request is granted, and the State’s motion for a rehearing is dismissed.