alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THREET v. STATE.

No. 25926.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1952.

Ray Martin, Wichita Falls, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Drunk driving is the offense; the punishment, ten days in jail.

On the afternoon of May 16, 1951, a highway patrolman was called to the scene of an automobile wreck just beyond the city limits of the city of Wichita Falls. There he found that a Ford pick-up truck had overturned. As a result of information then received, he went to> a hospital where he found appellant, who admitted to the witness that he was the driver of the pickup truck that had overturned. The witness testified that appellant was drunk at the time, with a strong odor of alcohol on his breath. The jailer into whose custody appellant was delivered testified that he was drunk at the time.

It is upon this testimony the conviction is predicated.

Appellant did not testify.

It is appellant’s contention that the facts are insufficient to support the conviction, in that the corpus delicti was not established outside of and other than his extrajudicial confession. To support his contention, appellant relies chiefly upon the fact that it is only by his statement that he is shown to have been the driver of the pick-up truck or, for that matter, of any other motor vehicle.

The corpus delicti of this offense consists of the fact that someone drove and operated a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated. The accused’s confession cannot, itself, establish such fact.

Outside of appellant’s confession, we have only a turned-over or wrecked pick-up on the highway to establish his guilt. Except for such confession, there is no testimony that he was the driver of the truck, that he owned the truck, or that he was seen at the place of the wreck.

That the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction is sustained by Pena v. State, 153 Tex.Cr.R. 637, 224 S.W.2d 258.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 5

Case 6:20-cv-00243-ADA Document 35-5 Filed 09/04/20 Page 1 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00243-ADA Document 35-5 Filed 09/04/20 Page 2 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00243-ADA Document 35-5 Filed 09/04/20 Page 3 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00243-ADA Document 35-5 Filed 09/04/20 Page 4 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00243-ADA Document 35-5 Filed 09/04/20 Page 5 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00243-ADA Document 35-5 Filed 09/04/20 Page 6 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00243-ADA Document 35-5 Filed 09/04/20 Page 7 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00243-ADA Document 35-5 Filed 09/04/20 Page 8 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00243-ADA Document 35-5 Filed 09/04/20 Page 9 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00243-ADA Document 35-5 Filed 09/04/20 Page 10 of 10
#### Herschel C. Patton, Plaintiff, *v.*Compania Aerea Viajes Expresos de Venezuela, S. A. also Doing Business as Aerovias Venezuela Europa, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 23, 1958.

*Melvin L. Bobbins*for plaintiff.

*Hale, Stimson, Bussell $ Nickerson*for defendant.

*Dickstein, Shapiro <& Friedman*for TJ. S. Overseas Airlines, Inc.

Samuel H. Hoestadter, J.

The defendant, a corporation organized under the laws of Venezuela, moves to vacate an ex parte order made pursuant to section 977-b of the Civil Practice Act, which provides, in substance, that upon an affidavit reciting the necessary facts the plaintiff may apply, without notice, for the appointment of a temporary receiver and that the court “ must thereupon appoint such receiver ”. The plaintiff here followed the procedure so prescribed. Though the defendant on this motion impugns the plaintiff’s motives in applying for the appointment of the receiver, the court is not persuaded that it should summarily vacate the order. The statute is aimed to protect the rights of local creditors. (See *Oliner*v. *American-Oriental Banking Corp.,*252 App. Div. 212; *Talmon*v. *Societatea Romana Pentru Industria De Bumbac,*206 Misc. 449.) The papers show that, aside from the plaintiff, there are or may be other local creditors; the defendant’s offer to post security as a condition of granting its motion furnishes no assurance that the rights of all creditors will thereby be fully protected. The statute contemplates a judicial administration of the assets in the interest of all creditors. The action being in the nature of a class action, the rights of all creditors for whose benefit it has been brought must be safeguarded. Their rights, as well as those of the plaintiff, should be provided for. (See *Young*v. *Higbee Co.,*324 U. S. 204, 214.) *334The court has now no clear or definite knowledge of the identity of the creditors or of the amounts of their claims; obviously the assets should not be released in the absence of dependable proof of the foregoing. The defendant’s assertion that it still is actively engaged in business merely presents an issue for trial ; the defendant may by promptly filing an answer obtain an early trial of this or any other issue in the case and is entitled to an order setting the case for trial on a day certain as a preferred cause (Civ. Prac. Act, § 977-b, subd. 9). The motion is accordingly denied.
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Siboney Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy J. Tegeler, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/ Timothy J.
Tegeler
 Timothy J.
Tegeler
 Chief Executive
Officer
 
 
 May 16, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE )

COMMISSION, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

V. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-20-CA-598-FB

)

PAUL R. MONTGOMERY, JR.; )

MICHAEL D. FISHER; and JAMES )

H. WILLINGHAM, JR., )

)

 Defendants. )

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS

Before the Court is the status of the above-styled and numbered cause. A Final Judgment by

Default has been entered against Defendants Montgomery and Fisher (Dkt. No. 17), and a Final

Judgment against Defendant Willingham (Dkt. No. 21) has been entered, incorporating the previously

agreed-upon and entered injunctive relief and other relief in the Judgment entered against Defendant

Willingham (Dkt. No. 5) on May 21, 2021. As it appears there are no remaining issues to be resolved, 

the Court is of the opinion that this case can be dismissed pursuant to a final judgment as to all

defendants. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the above styled and

numbered cause is DISMISSED. Motions pending with the Court, if any, are Dismissed as Moot and

this case is CLOSED.

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED this 31st day of March, 2021.

 _________________________________________________

 FRED BIERY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00598-FB Document 22 Filed 03/31/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Gold Billion Group Holdings Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014 (the Report), I, Kok Seng Yeap Eddy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: August 27, 2015 /s/ Kok Seng Yeap Eddy
 Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25819]



[[Page 60221]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

National Science Foundation


Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L.92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Committee on the NSF Niche in K-16 Education, a 
subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Education and Human 
Resources (#1119).
    Date and Time: October 17, 2000; 1:30 p.m.-5:30 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
1235 Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Daryl Chubin, NSB Senior Policy Officer, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 1220, 
Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703)292-7000.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources.
    Agenda: To discuss NSF's niche in K-16 Education.
    Reason for Late Notice: Coordinating members of committee to 
accommodate meeting schedules. This meeting needs to be held before 
the Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources meeting on 
November 8-9.

    Dated: October 3, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25819 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
UNDER SECTION 906




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Fortress International Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:




The
Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-K”) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




Dated: March
      31, 2010
              /s/ Thomas P. RosatoThomas
      P. RosatoChief
      Executive Officer(Principal Executive
      Officer)Dated:
      March 31, 2010
              /s/ Timothy C. DecTimothy
      C. DecChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT 

OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION 

DROPBOX, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 6:20-cv-00251-ADA 

ORDER 

 This Court, after considering Dropbox, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion for Withdrawal of 

Counsel, is of the opinion that the Unopposed Motion should be GRANTED. 

IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion for Withdrawal is GRANTED and Yvonne 

Lee is hereby withdrawn as Dropbox, Inc.’s counsel of record. 

SIGNED THIS ____ day of ________ 2023. 

 ___________________________________ 

 ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 233-1 Filed 03/13/23 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act that a meeting of the Mojave National Preserve Advisory Commission will be held on October 17, 2000. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. at the Primm Valley Resort in Primm, Nevada. 

The agenda will include updates on park activities, Kelso Depot design status, Hole-in-the-Wall Interagency Fire Center design status, Comprehensive Interpretive Planning overview, and the status of the revised draft General Management Plan. 

The Advisory Commission was established by Public Law 103-433 to provide advice on the development and implementation of the general management plan for the Preserve. 

Current members of the Commission are: Irene Ausmus, Rob Blair, Peter Burk, Donna Davis, Kathy Davis, Gerald Freeman, Willis Herron, Eldon Hughes, Claudia Luke, Clay Overson, Norbert Riedy, Mal Wessel. 

This meeting is open to the public. 

Dennis Schramm, 

Acting Superintendent, Mojave National Preserve. 

[FR Doc. 00-25565 Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
DENIED and Opinion F iled November 17, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01217-CV IN RE PAUL A. PR OPES, JR., Relator Original Proceeding from the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-82537-08 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Nowell Before the Court is relator’s Novemb er 14, 2022 petition seeking a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to re spond to, hold a hearing on, and rule on relator’s motion for “Coram Nobis.” To establish a right to mandamus relief in a criminal case, the relator must show that the trial court violated a minist erial duty and there is no adequate remedy at law. In re State ex rel. Weeks , 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Cr im. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). Relator bears the burden of provi ding the Court with a sufficient record to show he is entitled to relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).–2– Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in numerous respects. See, e.g. , T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.3(a)–(h), (j)–(k), 52.7(a). For instance, relator’s petition is not properly certified. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.3(j); In re Phillips , No. 05-21-01068-CV, 2022 WL 278240, at *1 (Tex. App.— Dallas Jan. 31, 2022, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Butler , 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, orig. proceed ing). Relator’s petition is also not supported by an appendix or record. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1); Butler , 270 S.W.3d at 759. Without a certif ied petition and appendix or record, relator has not carried his burden. See In re Jones , No. 05-22-01113-CV, 2022 WL 12338493, at *1 (Tex. App.—D allas Oct. 21, 2022, orig . proceeding) (mem. op.); Butler , 270 S.W.3d at 758–59. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

221217F.P05 /Erin A. Nowell / ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
Exhibit 1

Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 11
Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 11
Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 3 of 11
Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 4 of 11
Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 5 of 11
Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 6 of 11
Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 7 of 11
Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 8 of 11
Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 9 of 11
Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 10 of 11
Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 47-1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 11 of 11
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Western District of Texas

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

6:20-CV-458-ADA

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

09/03/2020 /s/ Michael J. Bettinger

Michael J. Bettinger, CA 122196

Sidley Austin LLP

555 California Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA, 94104

mbettinger@sidley.com

(415) 772-1200

(415) 772-7400

Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 16 Filed 09/03/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 3rd day of September, 2020, I 

electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the 

Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send notificationof such filing to all 

counsel of record who are registered to receive electronic notices.

/s/ Michael J. Bettinger

MICHAEL J. BETTINGER

Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 16 Filed 09/03/20 Page 2 of 2
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4806 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain battery operated ice 

cream makers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain battery 

operated ice cream makers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN BATTERY OPERATED ICE CREAM 

4 MAKERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Battery operated single 

serve ice cream makers 

(provided for in subheading (8509.40.00) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4806 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5205 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5205

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain PCBTF with antioxidant.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Mulvaney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain PCBTF with antioxidant.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PCBTF WITH ANTIOXIDANT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1-Chloro-4-         Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (trifluoromethyl)                                                 12/31/2015
                          benzene (CAS No.
                          98-56-6)
                          containing an
                          antioxidant
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2903.99.08 or
                          3824.90.92)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Mark Tripp, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Easton-Bell Sports, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions based uponthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date:April 6, 2007 /s/ Mark Tripp     Mark Tripp  Chief Financial Officer
108
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04 331A0 32