### 18425 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules

1 The Report on the 2008 analysis is available on
the DOE Web site at: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/ buildings/appliance

_ standards/residential/pdfs/ five

_ lamp

_ types

_ report.pdf. * * * * *

Dated: March 29, 2011. David R. Shipman, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing

Service.

[FR Doc. 2011–7826 Filed 4–1–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–02–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY**

**10 CFR Part 430**

**[Docket No. EERE–2011–BT–NOA–0013]**

**Energy Conservation Program: Data Collection and Comparison With**  **Forecasted Unit Sales of Five Lamp Types** 

**AGENCY :**  Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.

**ACTION :**  Notice of data availability.

**SUMMARY :**  The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is informing the public of its collection of shipment data and creation of spreadsheet models to provide comparisons between actual
and benchmark estimate unit sales of five lamp types ( i.e., rough service lamps, vibration service lamps, 3-way incandescent lamps, 2,601–3,300 lumen general service incandescent lamps, and shatter-resistant lamps), which are currently exempt from energy
conservation standards. As the actual
sales do not exceed the forecasted estimate by 100 percent for any lamp type ( i.e., the threshold triggering rulemaking for an energy conservation standard for that lamp type has not been exceeded), DOE has determined that no regulatory action is necessary at this time. However, DOE will continue to track sales data for these exempted lamps. Relating to this activity, DOE has prepared and is making available on its Web site a spreadsheet showing the comparisons of anticipated versus actual sales, as well as the model used to generate the original sales estimates. The spreadsheet is available at: http:// www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ appliance

_ standards/residential/ five

_ lamp

_ types.html

.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ms. Tina Kaarsberg, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies, EE–2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 287–1393. E-mail: Tina.Kaarsberg@ee.doe.gov

.

Mr. Eric Stas, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel, GC–71, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–9507. E-mail: Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov

.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Definitions

A. Rough Service Lamps B. Vibration Service Lamps C. Three-Way Incandescent Lamps D. 2,601–3,300 Lumen General Service

Incandescent Lamps E. Shatter-Resistant Lamps III. Comparison Methodology IV. Comparison Results

A. Rough Service Lamps B. Vibration Service Lamps C. Three-Way Incandescent Lamps D. 2,601–3,300 Lumen General Service

Incandescent Lamps E. Shatter-Resistant Lamps
V. Conclusion

I. Background

The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007) (Pub. L. 110–140) was enacted on December 19, 2007. Among the requirements of subtitle B (Lighting Energy Efficiency) of title III of EISA 2007 were provisions directing the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to collect, analyze, and monitor unit sales of five lamp types ( i.e., rough service lamps, vibration service lamps, 3-way incandescent lamps, 2,601–3,300 lumen general service incandescent lamps, and shatter-resistant lamps). In relevant part, section 321(a)(3)(B) of EISA 2007 amended section 325(l) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA) by adding paragraph (4)(B) which generally directs DOE, in
consultation with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), to: (1) Collect unit sales data for each of the five lamp types for calendar years 1990 through 2006 in order to determine the historical growth rate for each lamp type; and (2) construct a model for each of the five lamp types based on
coincident economic indicators that closely match the historical annual growth rates of each lamp type to provide a neutral comparison
benchmark estimate of future unit sales. (42 U.S.C. 6295(l)(4)(B)) Section 321(a)(3)(B) of EISA 2007 also amends section 325(l) of EPCA by adding paragraph (4)(C), which in relevant part,
directs DOE to collect unit sales data for calendar years 2010 through 2025, in consultation with NEMA, for each of the five lamp types. DOE must then compare the actual lamp sales in that year with the benchmark estimate, determine if the unit sales projection has been exceeded, and issue the findings within 90 days after the end of the analyzed calendar year. (42 U.S.C. 6295(l)(4)(C))

On December 18, 2008, DOE issued a notice of data availability for the Report
on Data Collection and Estimated Future Unit Sales of Five Lamp Types (hereafter ‘‘ the 2008 analysis ’’ ) 1 which was published in the Federal Register on December 24, 2008. 73 FR 79072. The 2008 analysis presented the 1990 through 2006 shipment data collected in consultation with NEMA, the spreadsheet model DOE constructed for each lamp type, and the benchmark unit sales estimate for 2010 through 2025. Today’s NODA presents the first of the mandated follow-up comparisons. Section IV of this report compares the actual unit sales against benchmark unit
sales estimates for 2010.

EISA 2007 also amends section 325(l) of EPCA by adding paragraphs (4)(D) through (4)(H) which state that if DOE finds that the unit sales for a given lamp type in any year between 2010 and 2025
exceed the benchmark estimate of unit sales by at least 100 percent ( i.e., more than double the anticipated sales), then DOE must take regulatory action to establish an energy conservation standard for such lamps. (42 U.S.C. 6295(l)(4)(D)–(H)) For 2,601–3,300 lumen general service incandescentlamps, DOE must adopt a statutorilyprescribed energy conservation standard, and for the other four types of lamps, the statute requires DOE to initiate an accelerated rulemaking to establish energy conservation standards. If the Secretary does not complete the accelerated rulemakings within one year of the end of the previous calendar year,
there is a ‘‘ backstop requirement ’’ for each lamp type, which would establish energy conservation standard levels and related requirements by statute. Id.

As in the 2008 analysis, in this NODA, DOE uses manufacturer shipments as a surrogate for unit sales, because manufacturer shipment data is tracked and aggregated by the trade organization, NEMA. DOE believes that annual shipments track closely with actual unit sales of these five lamp types, as DOE presumes that retailer inventories remain constant from year to year. DOE believes this is a reasonable assumption because the markets for these five lamp types have existed for many years, thereby enabling
manufacturers and retailers to establish appropriate inventory levels that reflect market demand. Furthermore, in the long-run, unit sales could not increase


### 18426 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules

2 ‘‘ General service incandescent lamp ’’ is defined as a standard incandescent or halogen type lamp that—(I) is intended for general service applications; (II) has a medium screw base; (III) has a lumen range of not less than 310 lumens and not more than 2,600 lumens; and (IV) is capable of being operated at a voltage range at least partially within 110 and 130 volts. (42 U.S.C. 6291(30)(D))

3 The Federal Trade Commission issued the lamp labeling requirements in 1994 ( see 59 FR 25176 (May 13, 1994)). Further amendments were made to the lamp labeling requirements in 2007 ( see 16 CFR 305.15(b); 72 FR 49948, 49971–72 (August 29, 2007)). The package must display the lamp’s light output (in lumens), energy use (in watts), and lamp life (in hours). in any one year without manufacturer shipments increasing either that year or the following one. In either case, increasing unit sales must eventually result in increasing manufacturer shipments. This is the same methodology presented in DOE’s 2008 analysis, and the Department did not receive any comments challenging this assumption or the general approach.

II. Definitions

A. Rough Service Lamps

Section 321(a)(1)(B) of EISA 2007 amended section 321(30) of EPCA by adding the definition of a ‘‘ rough service lamp. ’’ The statutory definition reads as
follows: ‘‘ The term ‘rough service lamp’ means a lamp that—(i) has a minimum of 5 supports with filament configurations that are C–7A, C–11, C–17, and C–22 as listed in Figure 6–12
of the 9th edition of the IESNA [Illuminating Engineering Society of North America] Lighting handbook, or similar configurations where lead wires are not counted as supports; and (ii) is designated and marketed specifically for ‘rough service’ applications, with—(I) the designation appearing on the lamp packaging; and (II) marketing materials that identify the lamp as being for rough

service. ’’ (42 U.S.C. 6291(30)(X))

As noted above, rough service incandescent lamps must have a minimum of five filament support wires (not counting the two connecting leads at the beginning and end of the filament), and must be designated and
marketed for ‘‘ rough service ’’ applications. This type of incandescent lamp is typically used in applications where the lamp would be subject to
mechanical shock or vibration while it is operating. Standard incandescent lamps have only two support wires (which also serve as conductors), one at
each end of the filament coil. When operating ( i.e., when the tungsten filament is glowing so hot that it emits light), a standard incandescent lamp’s filament is brittle, and rough service applications could cause it to break prematurely. To address this problem, lamp manufacturers developed lamp designs that incorporate additional support wires along the length of the filament to ensure that it has support not just at each end, but at several other points as well. The additional support protects the filament during operation and enables longer operating life for incandescent lamps in rough service applications. Typical applications for these rough service lamps might include commercial hallways and stairwells, gyms, storage areas, and security areas. B. Vibration Service Lamps

Section 321(a)(1)(B) of EISA 2007 amended section 321(30) of EPCA by adding the definition of a ‘‘ vibration service lamp. ’’ The statutory definition
reads as follows: ‘‘ The term ‘vibration service lamp’ means a lamp that—(i) has filament configurations that are C–5, C–7A, or C–9, as listed in Figure 6–12 of the 9th Edition of the IESNA Lighting Handbook or similar configurations; (ii) has a maximum wattage of 60 watts; (iii) is sold at retail in packages of 2 lamps or less; and (iv) is designated and marketed specifically for vibration
service or vibration-resistant applications, with—(I) the designation appearing on the lamp packaging; and (II) marketing materials that identify the lamp as being vibration service only. ’’ (42 U.S.C. 6291(30)(AA))

The statute mentions three examples of filament configurations for vibration service lamps in Figure 6–12 of the IESNA Lighting Handbook, one of which ( i.e., C–7A) is also listed in the statutory definition of ‘‘ rough service lamp. ’’ The definition of ‘‘ vibration service lamp ’’ requires that such lamps have a maximum wattage of 60 watts and be sold at a retail level in packages of two lamps or less. Similar to rough service lamps, vibration service lamps must be designated and marketed for
vibration service or vibration-resistant applications. As the name suggests, this type of incandescent lamp is generally used in applications where the incandescent lamp would be subject to a continuous low level of vibration, such as in a ceiling fan light kit. In such applications, standard incandescent lamps without additional filament support wires may not achieve the full rated life, because the filament wire is brittle and would be subject to breakage at typical operating temperature. To address this problem, lamp manufacturers typically use a more malleable tungsten filament to avoid damage and short circuits between coils.

C. Three-Way Incandescent Lamps

Section 321(a)(1)(B) of EISA 2007 amended section 321(30) of EPCA by adding the definition of a ‘‘ 3-way incandescent lamp. ’’ The statutory
definition reads as follows: ‘‘ The term ‘3-way incandescent lamp’ includes an incandescent lamp that—(i) employs 2 filaments, operated separately and in combination, to provide 3 light levels; and (ii) is designated on the lamp packaging and marketing materials as being a 3-way incandescent lamp. ’’ (42 U.S.C. 6291(30)(Y))

Three-way lamps are commonly found in wattage combinations such as 50, 100, and 150 watts or 30, 70, and 100 watts. These lamps use two filaments ( e.g., a 30-watt and a 70-watt filament) and can be operated separately or together to produce three different lumen outputs ( e.g., 305 lumens with one filament, 995 lumens with the other, or 1,300 lumens using the filaments together). When used in 3-way sockets, these lamps allow users to control the light level. Three-way incandescent lamps are typically used in residential multi-purpose areas, where consumers may adjust the light level to be appropriate for the task they are performing.

D. 2,601–3,300 Lumen General Service Incandescent Lamps

The statute does not provide a
definition of ‘‘ 2,601–3,300 Lumen General Service Incandescent Lamps ’’ ; however, DOE is interpreting this term to be a general service incandescent lamp 2 that emits between 2,601 and 3,300 lumens. In this lumen range, the wattages of covered general service incandescent lamps are between 140 and 170 watts. Within that range, the only commonly made lamp that meets other general service incandescent lamp
criteria is rated at 150 watts. Should other rated wattages enter the market that fall within this lumen range, they will be immediately recognizable because as required by the Energy Policy Act of 1992, Public Law 102–486, all general service incandescent lamps must be labeled with lamp lumen output. 3 These lamps are used in general service applications when high light output is needed.

E. Shatter-Resistant Lamps

Section 321(a)(1)(B) of EISA 2007 amended section 321(30) of EPCA by adding the definition of a ‘‘ shatterresistant lamp, shatter-proof lamp, or shatter-protected lamp. ’’ The statutory
definition reads as follows: ‘‘ The terms ‘shatter-resistant lamp,’ ‘shatter-proof lamp,’ and ‘shatter-protected lamp’ mean a lamp that—(i) has a coating or equivalent technology that is compliant with [National Sanitation Foundation/


### 18427 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules

4 NSF/ANSI 51 applies specifically to materials and coatings used in the manufacturing of equipment and objects destined for contact with
foodstuffs.

5 The least squares function is an analytical tool that DOE uses to minimize the sum of the squared
residual differences between the actual historical data points and the modeled value ( i.e., the linear curve fit). In minimizing this value, the resulting curve fit will represent the best fit possible to the data provided. 6 See DOE’s 2008 forecast spreadsheet models of the lamp types for greater detail. The spreadsheet
models are available at: http:// www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ appliance

_ standards/residential/docs/ five

_ lamp

_ types

_ models.xls. American National Standards Institute] NSF/ANSI 51 and is designed to contain the glass if the glass envelope of the lamp is broken; and (ii) is designated
and marketed for the intended application, with—(I) the designation on the lamp packaging; and (II) marketing materials that identify the lamp as being shatter-resistant, shatter-proof, or shatter-protected. ’’ (42 U.S.C. 6291(30)(Z)) Although the definition provides three names commonly used to refer to these lamps, DOE simply refers to them collectively as ‘‘ shatter-resistant lamps. ’’

Shatter-resistant lamps incorporate a special coating designed to prevent glass shards from being strewn if a lamp’s glass envelope breaks. Shatter-resistant lamps incorporate a coating compliant with industry standard NSF/ANSI 51, 4

‘‘ Food Equipment Materials, ’’ and are
labeled and marketed as shatterresistant, shatter-proof, or shatterprotected. The coatings protect the lamp from breakage in applications subject to heat and thermal shock that may occur from water, sleet, snow, soldering, or welding.

III. Comparison Methodology

In the 2008 analysis, DOE reviewed each of the five sets of shipment data
that were collected in consultation with NEMA and applied two curve fits to generate unit sales estimates for the five lamp types after calendar year 2006. One curve fit applied a linear regression
to the historical data and extends that
line into the future. The other curve fit applied an exponential growth function to the shipment data and projects unit
sales into the future. For this calculation, linear regression treats the year as a dependent variable and shipments as the independent variable. The linear regression curve fit is modeled by minimizing the differences among the data points and the best curve-fit linear line using the least squares function. 5 The exponential curve fit is also a regression function and uses the same least squares function to find the best fit. For some data sets, an exponential curve provides a better characterization of the historical data, and, therefore, a better projection of the
future data. For 3-way incandescent lamps, 2,601– 3,300 lumen general serviceincandescent lamps, and shatterresistant lamps, DOE found that the linear regression and exponential growth curve fits produced nearly the same estimates of unit sales ( i.e., the
difference between the two forecasted values was less than 1 or 2 percent). However, for rough service and vibration service lamps, the linear regression curve fit projects lamp unit
sales would decline to zero for both lamp types by 2018. In contrast, the exponential growth curve fit projected a more gradual decline in unit sales, such that lamps will still be sold beyond 2018, and it was, therefore, considered
the more realistic forecast. While DOE
would be satisfied that either the linear regression or exponential growth spreadsheet model would generate a
reasonable benchmark unit sales estimate for 3-way incandescent lamps, 2,601–3,300 lumen general serviceincandescent lamps, and shatterresistant lamps, DOE is selecting the exponential growth curve fit for these lamp types for consistency with the selection made for rough service and vibration service lamps. 6 DOE examines
the benchmark unit sales estimates and actual sales for each of the five lamp types in the following section and also makes the comparisons available in a spreadsheet online at: http:// www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ appliance

_ standards/residential/ five

_ lamp

_ types.html.

IV. Comparison Results

A. Rough Service Lamps

For rough service lamps, the exponential growth forecast projected
the benchmark unit sales estimate for2010 to be 6,395,000 units. The NEMAprovided shipment data reported shipments of 7,971,000 rough service lamps in 2010. As this finding exceeds the estimate by only 24.6 percent, DOE will continue to track rough service lamp sales data and will not initiate regulatory action for this lamp type at
this time.

B. Vibration Service Lamps

For vibration service lamps, the exponential growth forecast projected
the benchmark unit sales estimate for2010 to be 3,341,000 units. The NEMAprovided shipment data reported shipments of 674,000 vibration service lamps in 2010. As this finding is only 20.2 percent of the estimate, DOE will continue to track vibration service lamp
sales data and will not initiate regulatory action for this lamp type at
this time.

C. Three-Way Incandescent Lamps

For 3-way incandescent lamps, the exponential growth forecast projected
the benchmark unit sales estimate for2010 to be 51,177,000 units. The NEMAprovided shipment data reported shipments of 29,140,000 3-way incandescent lamps in 2010. As this finding is only 56.9 percent of the estimate, DOE will continue to track 3-way incandescent lamp sales data and will not initiate regulatory action for this lamp type at this time.

D. 2,601–3,300 Lumen General Service Incandescent Lamps

For 2,601–3,300 lumen general service incandescent lamps, the exponential growth forecast projected
the benchmark unit sales estimate for2010 to be 33,848,000 units. The NEMAprovided shipment data reported shipments of 7,140,000 2,601–3,300 lumen general service incandescent lamps in 2010. As this finding is 21.1 percent of the estimate, DOE will continue to track 2,601–3,300 lumen general service incandescent lamp sales data and will not initiate regulatory action for this lamp type at this time.

E. Shatter-Resistant Lamps

For shatter-resistant lamps, the exponential growth forecast projected
the benchmark unit sales estimate for2010 to be 1,655,000 units. The NEMAprovided shipment data reported shipments of 848,000 shatter-resistant lamps in 2010. As this finding is only 51.2 percent of the estimate, DOE will continue to track shatter-resistant lamp
sales data and will not initiate regulatory action for this lamp type at
this time.

V. Conclusion

None of the shipments for the rough service lamps, vibration service lamps, 3-way incandescent lamps, 2,601–3,300 lumen general service incandescent lamps, or shatter-resistant lamps crossed the statutory threshold for a standard.
DOE will monitor the situation for these five currently exempted lamp types and will reassess 2011 sales by March 31, 2012, in order to determine whether energy conservation standards rulemaking is required, consistent with 42 U.S.C. 6295(l)(4)(D)–(H).


### 18428 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 30,

2011. Kathleen B. Hogan, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Office of Technology Development, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

[FR Doc. 2011–7939 Filed 4–1–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6450–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY**

**10 CFR Part 431**

**[Docket No. EERE–2010–BT–TP–0036]**

**RIN 1904–AC38**

**Energy Efficiency Program for Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment:** 
**Test Procedures for Automatic**
**Commercial Ice Makers**

**AGENCY :**  Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking.

**SUMMARY :**  The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to revise its test procedure for automatic commercial ice makers (ACIM) established under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. This notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) proposes to update the incorporation by reference of industry test procedures to the most current published versions. The current DOE test procedure applies to automatic commercial ice makers that produce cube type ice. This NOPR proposes to expand coverage of the test procedure to all batch type and continuous type ice makers with capacities between 50 and 4,000 pounds of ice per 24 hours. A batch type ice maker is defined as an ice maker with alternate freezing and harvesting periods, including machines that produce cube type ice, tube type ice, and fragmented ice. A continuous type ice maker is defined as an ice maker that continually freezes and
harvests ice at the same time. Continuous type ice makers primarily produce flake or nugget ice. DOE also proposes amendments to standardize test results based on ice quality for continuous type ice makers, clarify the test methods and reporting requirements for automatic ice makers designed to be connected to a remote compressor rack, and provide test methods for modulating capacity ice makers. Furthermore, DOE proposes to discontinue the use of a clarified energy use equation.

The test procedure applies to
automatic commercial ice makers as defined in section 136 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Use of any amended test procedures will be required on the compliance date of any standards developed in the associated energy conservation standard rulemaking. This notice announces a public meeting to
discuss and receive comments on the proposed test procedure amendments.

**DATES :**  DOE will hold a public meeting in Washington, DC on April 29, 2011 from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Additionally, DOE plans to make the public meeting available via webinar. See section V,

‘‘ Public Participation, ’’ of this NOPR for webinar registration information, participant instructions, and information about the capabilities available to webinar participants.

DOE will accept comments, data, and other information regarding this NOPR before or after the public meeting, but no later than June 3, 2011. See section V, ‘‘ Public Participation, ’’ for details.

**ADDRESSES :**  The public meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 8E–089, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. To attend, please notify Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202) 586–2945. Please note that foreign nationals planning to participate in the public meeting are subject to advance security screening procedures. Any foreign national wishing to participate in the meeting should advise DOE as soon as possible by contacting Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202) 586–2945 to initiate the necessary procedures.

Any comments submitted must identify the NOPR for test procedures for automatic commercial ice makers, and provide docket number EERE– 2010–BT–TP–0036 or Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) 1904–AC38. Comments may be submitted using any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• E-mail: ACIM-2010-TP0036@ee.doe.gov. Include the docket
number EERE–2010–BT–TP–0036 and/ or RIN 1904–AC38 in the subject line of the message.

• Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. If possible, please submit all items on CD. It is not necessary to include printed copies.

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, 950 L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 586–2945. If possible, please
submit all items on CD. It is not necessary to include printed copies. Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this proposed rule may be submitted to Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy through the methods listed above and by e-mail to
Christine

_ J.

_Kymn@omb.eop.gov.
Docket: The docket is available for review at regulations.gov, including Federal Register notices, framework documents, public meeting attendee lists and transcripts, comments, and other supporting documents/materials.
All documents in the docket are listed in the regulations.gov index. However,
not all documents listed in the index may be publicly available, such as information that is exempt from public disclosure. The regulations.gov web page will contain instructions on how to access all documents in the docket, including public comments.

The rulemaking web page can be
found at: http://www.eere.energy.gov/ buildings/appliance

_ standards/
commercial/automatic

_ ice

_ making

_ equipment.html. This web page contains
a link to the docket for this notice on regulations.gov.

For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see section V, ‘‘ Public Participation, ’’ of
this document.

For further information on how to submit or review public comments, participate in the public meeting, or view hard copies of the docket in the Resource Room, contact Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202) 586–2945 or e-mail: Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mr. Charles Llenza, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies, EE–2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–2192,
Charles

_Llenza@ee.doe.gov.

In the Office of General Counsel contact Mr. Ari Altman, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of General Counsel, GC–71, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585– 0121, (202) 287–6307, Ari.Altman@hq.doe.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. Background and Legal Authority II. Summary of the Proposed Rule

A. Proposed Test Procedure Amendments B. Association With Energy Conservation

Standards Rulemaking

III. Discussion

A. Summary of the Test Procedure

Revisions