alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION 

LINDA JANN LEWIS; MADISON LEE; 

ELLEN SWEETS; BENNY ALEXANDER; 

GEORGE MORGAN, VOTO LATINO, 

TEXAS STATE CONFERENCE OF THE 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE 

ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE; 

and TEXAS ALLIANCE OF RETIRED 

AMERICANS, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

RUTH HUGHS, in her official capacity as 

the Texas Secretary of State, 

Defendant. 

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20-cv-00577-OLG 

THE TEXAS SECRETARY OF STATE’S NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 3(a)(1) and 4(a)(1)(A), Defendant Ruth 

Hughs, in her official capacity as the Texas Secretary of State, gives this notice of appeal to the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from the Order entered in this action on July 28, 2020. 

[ECF No. 31] The Secretary moved to dismiss all claims based on sovereign immunity. The order 

denying the Secretary’s motion to dismiss is therefore immediately appealable under the collateralorder doctrine. See Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139, 141 (1993); 

City of Austin v. Paxton, 943 F.3d 993, 996 (5th Cir. 2019). Because the Secretary asserted sovereign 

immunity against all claims asserted by the plaintiffs, this notice of appeal divests this Court of 

jurisdiction during the pendency of the appeal. “[N]otice of interlocutory appeal following a district 

court’s denial of a defendant’s immunity defense divests the district court of jurisdiction to proceed 

against that defendant.” Williams v. Brooks, 996 F.2d 728, 729 (5th Cir. 1993) (per curiam); see also Wooten 

Case 5:20-cv-00577-OLG Document 32 Filed 08/07/20 Page 1 of 2
2 

v. Roach, 964 F.3d 395, 412 (5th Cir. 2020). Based on the foregoing Fifth Circuit precedent, proceedings 

in this Court, including all discovery matters, are suspended pending resolution of the appeal. 

Date: August 7, 2020 Respectfully submitted. 

KEN PAXTON

Attorney General of Texas 

JEFFREY C. MATEER

First Assistant Attorney General 

RYAN L. BANGERT

Deputy First Assistant Attorney General 

/s/Patrick K. Sweeten 

PATRICK K. SWEETEN

Associate Deputy for Special Litigation 

TODD LAWRENCE DISHER

Deputy Chief, Special Litigation Unit 

WILLIAM T. THOMPSON 

Special Counsel 

KATHLEEN HUNKER

Special Counsel 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

P.O. Box 12548 (MC-009) 

Austin, Texas 78711-2548 

Tel.: (512) 936-1414 

Fax: (512) 936-0545 

patrick.sweeten@oag.texas.gov 

todd.disher@oag.texas.gov 

will.thompson@oag.texas.gov 

kathleen.hunker@oag.texas.gov 

COUNSEL FOR THE TEXAS SECRETARY OF 

STATE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically (via 

CM/ECF) on August 7, 2020, and that all counsel of record were served by CM/ECF. 

/s/Patrick K. Sweeten 

PATRICK K. SWEETEN

Case 5:20-cv-00577-OLG Document 32 Filed 08/07/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Brad Bodenman, Chief Financial Officer of American Seafoods Group LLC (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2004                             
|                                                  
|/s/    BRAD BODENMAN                              
|                                                  
|Name: Brad Bodenman Title: Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Appendix E

ARB Board Meeting Agenda and Public Hearing Transcript
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5306 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on Cyazofamid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Ms. SCHWARTZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty 

on Cyazofamid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYAZOFAMID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by by striking heading 9902.24.56 (relating to 

7 Cyazofamid) and inserting in numerical sequence the fol8 lowing new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5306 IH

‘‘ 9902.24.56 4-chloro-2-cyano-N,N-dimethyl-5-(4-methylphenyl)- 

1H-imidazole-1-sulfonamide (Cyazofamid 

Technical) (CAS No. 

120116–88–3) (provided 

for in subheading 

2935.00.75) and any formulations containing such 

compound (provided for in 

subheading 3808.92.15) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the annual report of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ending December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary Vogel, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



Date: December 30, 2016





/s/ Gary Vogel

Gary Vogel

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer of the registrant)
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Miller Art Co., Inc., et al., Petitioners, and Benjamin Firestone et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

October 11, 1957.

*283
      *Milton Pollack*for petitioners.

*Edwin M. Slote*and *Max Lynne*for respondents.

Harold A. Stevens, J.

This is an application to stay arbitration proceedings demanded by respondents. The arbitration clause in the contract involved (par. 12) is phrased in broad comprehensive language. It embraces “ any difference, claim or matter in dispute arising between or among them out of this agreement or connected herewith ’ ’. It seems clear, by the language used, that the parties intended to dispose of all of their disputes by arbitration. This should be enforced *(Matter of River Brand Rice Mills*v. *Latrobe Brewing Co.,*305 N. Y. 36). There is no dispute presented as to the making of the contract. Petitioners seek to interpret the terms of the arbitration clause, and the intent of the parties under the contract, to a holding that the matters in dispute are not arbitrable. Since the papers disclose that there is a dispute, that there is a contract to arbitrate, and a refusal to arbitrate, the matters of fact and of law and issues are all within the exclusive jurisdiction of the arbitrators *(Matter of Crosett [Mt. Vernon Housing Auth.],*275 App. Div. 1051; *Matter of Lipman [Haeuser Shellac Co.],*289 N. Y. 76, 80; *Matter of Wenger & Co.*v. *Propper Silk Hosiery Mills,*239 N .Y. 199; *Matter of Spectrum Fabrics Corp. [Main St. Fabrics],*285 App. Div. 710, affd. 309 N. Y. 709; *Matter of Carlin Constr. Co. [Bartley Bros. Constr. Corp.],*280 App. Div. 801, affd. 305 N. Y. 784).

Petitioners’ application to stay arbitration proceedings is therefore denied. Settle order.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-60638

_____________________

GEORGE SHANO,

Petitioner,

v.

RENE CROSS CONSTRUCTION; LOUISIANA

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMPANY; DIRECTOR, 

OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

_________________________________________________________________

Petition for Review of an Order 

of the Benefits Review Board

(98-0166)

_________________________________________________________________

September 23, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner George P. Shano petitions for review of the

decision and order of the Benefits Review Board affirming the

decision and order of the Administrative Law Judge that

petitioner is excluded from coverage under the Longshore and

Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. § 901 et.

seq. (the “Act”). The Administrative Law Judge concluded that
2

petitioner, after his transfer to Cypress Cove Marina,

Incorporated, was a marina worker and, as such, was specifically

excluded from coverage under the Act by Section 2(3)(C) thereof. 

The Benefits Review Board correctly concluded that the decision

of the Administrative Law Judge was supported by substantial

evidence and affirmed that decision. Accordingly, the petition

for review is

DENIED.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5229 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,6-Diisocyanato-hexane homopolymer, 

polyethylene-polypropylene glycol mono-Bu ether blocked. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,6-Diisocyanato-hexane 

homopolymer, polyethylene-polypropylene glycol mono-Bu 

ether blocked. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,6-DIISOCYANATO-HEXANE HOMOPOLYMER, 

4 POLYETHYLENE-POLYPROPYLENE GLYCOL 

5 MONO-BU ETHER BLOCKED. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5229 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,6-Diisocyanato-hexane 

homopolymer, polyethylenepolypropylene glycol monoBu ether blocked (CAS No. 

125252–47–3) (provided 

for in subheading 

3911.90.90) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Alabama Dry Natural Gas Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Alabama Dry Natural Gas Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 40     | 4      | 13    
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 5      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 433    | 35     | 95     | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 10     | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 42     | 0      | 0      | 3      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 2      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 2      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Western District of Texas

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

6:20-CV-454-ADA

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

09/03/2020 /s/ John W. McBride

John W. McBride, IL 6294453

Sidley Austin LLP

1 S Dearborn

Chicago, IL, 60603

jwmcbride@sidley.com

(312) 853-7000

(312) 853-7036

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 09/03/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 3rd day of September, 2020, I 

electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the 

Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send notificationof such filing to all 

counsel of record who are registered to receive electronic notices.

/s/ John W. McBride

JOHN W. MCBRIDE

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 18 Filed 09/03/20 Page 2 of 2
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5378 

To suspend temporarily the duty on dimethylisopropylamine (DMIPA). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. FITZPATRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on dimethylisopropylamine 

(DMIPA). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIMETHYLISOPROPYLAMINE (DMIPA). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Dimethylisopropylamine 

(DMIPA) (CAS No. 996– 

35–0) (provided for in subheading 2921.19.6090) ..... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5378 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### HUNT v. STATE.

No. 25748.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 12, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area. Appellant, having plead guilty, was assessed a fine of $200.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

The complaint and information and proceedings appearing regular, and nothing being presented for review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
Exhibit 

Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 48-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 2
From: mark waltfairpllc.com

To: Yang Irene

Cc: Barry Shelton; Sidley - WSOU Litigation; Ryan Loveless; Jim Etheridge

Subject: RE: Re: WSOU - Microsoft - Markman Briefing

Date: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 8:20:21 AM

Attachments: Joint Stipulation Regarding Markman Briefing.docx

Irene,

Attached is a draft joint stipulation for submission to the Court. With the recent reduction in claim terms since yesterday, we think the

briefing limit should revert back to forty changes. This change is highlighted in the document.

Please confirm this is acceptable, add your signature block, and we will get this on file.

Sincerely,

Mark

 

Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 48-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 195 (Friday, October 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25723]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--HDP User Group International, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 30, 2000, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), HDP User Group 
International, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the 
purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA and NEC 
Corporation, Yokohama, JAPAN have been added as parties to this 
venture. Also, Abpac Inc., Phoenix, AZ has been dropped as a party to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and HDP User Group International, Inc. 
intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On September 14, 1994, HDP User Group International, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 23, 1995 (60 FR 15306).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 1, 
2000. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on August 17, 2000 (65 FR 50217).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-25723 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5379 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5379

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain reusable grocery 
                                 bags.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Fitzpatrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain reusable grocery 
                                 bags.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN REUSABLE GROCERY BAGS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.01 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to shopping bags of an outer 
surface of spun bonded polypropylene fabric or nonwoven polypropylene 
fabric) is amended by striking the date in the effective period column 
and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```