alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JORDAN et ux. v. MADISON et al.

No. 14371.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

June 8, 1951.

*194Charles F. Umphress and Clarence Carpenter, both of Dallas, for appellants.

Ely Straus and A. H. McCulloch, both of Dallas, for appellees.

CRAMER, Justice.

Appellants, Willie Jordan et ux., as plaintiffs filed this suit against appellee Dillie B. Madison and her husband T. B. Madison, and also against T. B. Madison as trustee, to set aside a trustee’s deed dated May 3, 1949, executed by Leo Nevitt, substitute trustee, to Thomas B. Madison, trustee, as grantee, conveying Lot 16, Block B-2240 of Southland Addition to the City of Dallas, Texas, and seeking to quiet appellants’ title to said property; said trustee’s deed having been executed under the terms of a deed of trust dated March 19, 1945 securing a note in the original principal sum of $3,550 due and payable to Dil-lie B. Madison in monthly installments of $40 each including interest; the first installment due on or before April 19, 1945 and containing acceleration of maturity provision. After a trial before a jury, the trial court sustained a motion for an instructed verdict in favor of appellees and thereafter on July 19, 1950, rendered, signed and entered judgment thereon decreeing that appellants, plaintiffs there, take nothing. Appellants filed their original motion for new trial July 20, 1950. Such motion was not amended within 20 days after the filing of the original motion. The amended motion was filed August 10, 1950, 21 days after the filing of the original motion and therefore could not be considered. The original motion was not submitted within 30 days after it was filed; therefore overruled by operation of law at the expiration of such 30 day period, on August 19, 1950. Rule 330 (j), Vernon’s Texas Rules of Civil Procedure; Bowman v. Traders & General Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 219 S.W.2d 148 (Syl. 1), error refused. The appeal bond was not filed within 30 days after August 19, 1950; in fact was not filed until October 16, 1950, 58 days thereafter. The filing of the appeal bond within the 30 day period after the motion for new trial was overruled, whether by the court or by operation of law, was jurisdictional. Rule 356, V.T.R. C.P.; Bruce v. San Antonio Music Co., Tex.Civ.App., 165 S.W.2d 243, error refused; Grant v. Hughes, Tex.Civ.App., 198 S.W.2d 630.

But appellant says we should consider the amended motion as an original motion. No jurisdiction is shown under such contention. The amended motion for new trial was filed August 10, 1950, or 22 days after the judgment. It was therefore 12 days late. Rule 330(k), V.T.R.C.P. It was not thereafter again amended, and was not presented to the court until September 15, 1950, which was not within 30 days after it was filed. Considered as an original motion, it would have been overruled by operation of law on the 30th day after it was filed, or on September 9, 1950. Bowman v. Traders & General Ins. Co., supra. Too, the appeal bond was filed October 16, 1950, six days after the 30 day limit. Rule 356, supra.

The motion to dismiss is sustained.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Order entered November 12, 2012 

fiftb 

In The 

Court of Rppea1.5 

i5tritt of Texa5 at alia5 

No. 05-12-01158-CR 

CLAUDE CHARLES POWELL, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F11-62508-H 

ORDER 

We GRANT Official Court Reporter Crystal R. Jones's November 7, 2012 request for an 

extension of time to file the reporter's record to the extent the reporter's record shall be due 

THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order. 

721 

LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000092195
<NAME> SOUTHERN INDIANA GAS AND ELECTRIC CO

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      735,915
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      2,561
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         105,046
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        45,453
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 888,975
<COMMON>                                        78,258
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            255,903
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 334,161
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,282
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           249,299
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              21,458
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   53,700
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 211,075
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  888,975
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      286,933
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            22,638
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     213,590
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     236,228
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         50,705
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 314
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  51,019
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        12,754
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,265
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        809
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   37,456
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        21,965
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       11,601
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          78,602
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Aries Dewitt Associates, Respondent, v WIXT-TV, Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Murphy, J. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J.—partial summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
#### HICKS v. STATE.

No. 23927.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 11, 1948.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of child desertion and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception. There being nothing presented for our consideration, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5308 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5308

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Cypermethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Ms. Schwartz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Cypermethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYPERMETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.74 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Cypermethrin) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4721 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on monocarboxylic 

fatty acids derived from palm oil. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. HOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 

monocarboxylic fatty acids derived from palm oil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MONOCARBOXYLIC FATTY ACIDS DERIVED 

4 FROM PALM OIL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.32 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 monocarboxylic fatty acids derived from palm oil) is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘1.2%’’ and inserting ‘‘1.4%’’; 

10 and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4721 IH

1 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

2 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
---

Exhibit 99.10

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 40-F of Hudbay Minerals Inc. (Hudbay) for the year ended
December 31, 2016, and any amendments thereto (the Form 40-F), I, Cashel
Meagher, P.Geo., hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the
references to and summaries of scientific and technical information relating to
Hudbays mineral properties (collectively, the Incorporated Information) and
to the inclusion of the Incorporated Information in the Annual Information Form
and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition for the year ended December 31, 2016, each filed as an exhibit to the
Form 40-F and incorporated by reference therein.

I do also hereby consent to the
use of my name and the incorporation by reference of the Incorporated
Information in Registration Statement Nos. 333-170295, 333-197080 and 333-212750
on Form S-8 (including, in each case, any amendments thereto).

Yours very truly

/s/ Cashel MeagherCashel Meagher, P.Geo.Dated: March 31, 2017


---
Exhibit 13.1


                    INTERSTAR MILLENNIUM SERIES 2003-1G TRUST

      Quarterly Noteholders Report Related to the May 27, 2003 Distribtion


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                     <C>

Aggregate  principal amount of each class of notes as at the            A2 Notes:  USD $750,000,000.00
first  day after  the  Payment  Date  occurring  during  the                       AUD $1,313,962,000.39
collection period:                                                      B1 Notes:  USD $15,500,000.00
                                                                                   AUD $25,900,365.62


Aggregate  amount of interest payable on each class of notes            A2 Notes:  USD $2,985,208.33
on the Payment Date being 27th May 2003:
                                                                        B1 Notes:  USD $83,919.58


Aggregate  of  principal  payments  to be made in respect to            A2 Notes:  USD $19,749,525.00
each class of notes on the Payment Date being 27th May 2003:
                                                                        B1 Notes:  USD $408,156.85


Income for the collection period:                                       AUD $22,731,639.89


The Mortgage Principal Repayments for the collection period:            AUD $57,483,096.80


Expenses of the trust for the collection period:                        AUD $19,265,463.34


Aggregate  of all redraws on the  housing  loans made during            AUD $20,272,532
the collection period:


Interest  rates  (US all in) applicable for interest period             A2 Notes: 1.5500%
ending 26th August 2003:                                                B1 Notes: USD 2.1300%

The scheduled and unscheduled  payments of principal  during            Scheduled:      AUD $1,489,412
the collection period:                                                  Unscheduled:    AUD $55,993,685


Aggregate of outstanding balances of housing loans as at the            16 May 2003:    AUD $1,361,523,177.55
last of day of the collection period:


Delinquency  and loss statistics with respect to the housing            Loss:
loans as at the last day of the collection period                       Nil
                                                                        Delinquency:
                                                                        0-29     1.55%
                                                                        30-59    0.19%
                                                                        60+      0.06%
</TABLE>

                                  Page 1 of 1
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 79     | 202    | 89    
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 123    | 84     | 99     | 42     | 257    | 83     | 78     | 144    | 277    | 84    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 101    | 83     | 99     | 24     | 201    | 74     | 79     | 34     | 110    | 322   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 110    | 606    | 490    | 767    | 278    | 112    | 502    | 325    | 564    | 491   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 219    | 341    | 1,926  | 444    | 617    | 3,125  | 342    | 268    | 130    | 962   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 519    | 28     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO DIVISION

BRANDON CALLIER,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SUNPATH LTD.; NORTHCOAST 

WARRANTY SERVICES, INC.; and 

JOHN DOES 1-4,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 

EP-20-CV-00105-FM

ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE 

On this day, the court considered the case’s status. On April 20, 2020, Brandon Callier 

filed two cases in the Western District of Texas: the above-captioned cause and 20-CV-00106-

FM.

1

 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42 (“Rule 42”) empowers a district court to consolidate 

actions “[i]f the actions before the court involve a common question of law or fact.”2 The court 

has discretion to determine whether consolidation “promote[s] the administration of justice.”3 

After careful consideration, the court finds consolidation of these two causes appropriate. 

Consistent with Rule 42(a), both cases arise from a common question of law and fact—violations 

of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The only difference between the two cases are the 

addition of another defendant in 20-CV-00106-FM. Allowing the suits to proceed separately 

would result in waste of judicial resources, increased costs of litigation, and the risk of 

1 The second cause is Callier v. SunPath et.al, No. EP-20-CV-00106-FM.

2 FED. R. CIV. P. 42(a); Frazier v. Garrison I.S.D., 980 F.2d 1514, 1531 (5th Cir. 1993). 

3 Gentry v. Smith, 487 F.2d 571, 581 (5th Cir. 1973).

Case 3:20-cv-00105-FM Document 11 Filed 08/17/20 Page 1 of 2
2

inconsistent adjudications. The court also notes the parties would not be prejudiced by 

consolidation whatsoever because one suit would resolve the entirety of the dispute. Hence, 

consolidation is proper, as it will “eliminate unnecessary repetition and confusion.”4

III. CONCLUSION AND ORDERS

Accordingly, the court enters the following orders:

1. It is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL consolidate cause 

numbers EP-20-CV-00105-FM and EP-20-CV-00106-FM into one cause for all 

purposes. This matter SHALL proceed under cause number EP-20-CV-00106-

FM.

2. It is FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions in EP-20-CV-00105-FM 

are DENIED AS MOOT.

3. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is instructed to CLOSE

cause number EP-20-CV-00105-FM.

SIGNED AND ENTERED this ___17th____ day of August, 2020.

FRANK MONTALVO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4 Dupont v. S. Pac. Co., 366 F.2d 193, 195 (5th Cir. 1966). 

Case 3:20-cv-00105-FM Document 11 Filed 08/17/20 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                    
|Louisiana--North Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves New Reservoir in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5329 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Poly(urea/formaldehyde/ 

isobutyraldehyde). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. DINGELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Poly(urea/formaldehyde/ 

isobutyraldehyde). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLY(UREA/FORMALDEHYDE/ 

4 ISOBUTYRALDEHYDE). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Poly(urea/formaldehyde/ 

isobutyraldehyde) (CAS 

No. 28931–47–7) (provided for in subheading 

3909.10.00) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5329 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Larry Dale Smith

, * From the 104 th District

Court of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 18117B

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00067

- CR * March 20, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.