alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: September 16, 2009
    By:
    /s/   Christian B. RagotChristian B. RagotPresident and Chief Executive Officer 92
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|U.S. Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|U.S. Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 19,051 | 13,756 | 10,185 | 10,638 | 12,571 | 10,235 | 25,122 | 14,620 | 7,910  | 3,477 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 10,879 | 45,989 | 5,941  | 8,630  | 23,705 | 12,933 | 15,529 | 39,366 | 29,793 | 25,059
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 17,509 | 25,680 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 11



                           NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE


The following  table presents the  information  needed to compute primary income
per common share:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                                       (Unaudited)                                (Unaudited)
                                               For the Three Months Ended                   For the Six Months Ended
                                              12/28/96             12/30/95              12/28/96              12/30/95
                                             (13 Weeks)           (13 Weeks)            (26 Weeks)            (26 Weeks)
                                             ----------           ----------            ----------            ----------

<S>                                     <C>                      <C>               <C>                       <C>          
Net income (loss)                       $        321,140         $    (358,107)    $         829,369         $   (737,145)

Weighted average shares
   outstanding                                 3,262,866             3,236,199             3,249,826            3,236,199
Less: Treasury Shares                            (27,600)              (27,600)              (27,600)             (27,600)
Add:  Assumed exercise of
   options reduced by the
   number of shares purchased
   with proceeds                                 124,075                36,236               116,662               69,336
                                             -----------          ------------           -----------         ------------
Adjusted weighted average of
   shares outstanding                          3,359,341             3,244,835             3,338,888            3,277,935
                                             ===========            ==========             =========           ==========

Net income (loss) per share                     $ 0.10               $  (0.11)                $ 0.25             $ (0.23)
                                                 =====                =======                  =====              ======
</TABLE>

                                                                        Page 13

<PAGE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1349-1350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31569]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0335; FRL-9905-04-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; 
Procedures for Stringency Determinations and Minor Permit Revisions for 
Federal Operating Permits

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 10, 2013, the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA)

[[Page 1350]]

published a direct final rule approving portions of three revisions to 
the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning the Texas Federal 
Operating Permits Program. EPA received timely, adverse comments on the 
direct final rule and withdrew the direct final rule on November 6, 
2013. In our withdrawal of the direct final rule, we indicated we would 
address the comments received through the proposed rule published on 
September 10, 2013. Subsequent to our withdrawal of the direct final, 
EPA received a letter dated December 19, 2013, from the Texas 
Commission on Environmental Quality stating that the December 17, 1999; 
October 4, 2001; and August 11, 2003 revisions specific to stringency 
determinations and minor permit revisions for Federal Operating Permits 
have been withdrawn from our consideration as revisions to the Texas 
SIP. Accordingly, EPA is withdrawing the proposed approval and finds 
that no further action is necessary on the portions of the three SIP 
revisions specific to stringency determinations and minor permit 
revisions for the Texas Federal Operating Permits Program. The State's 
action also withdraws from EPA's review the Federal Operating Permits 
Program component of the January 22, 2010 Consent Decree between EPA 
and the BCCA Appeal Group, Texas Association of Business, and Texas Oil 
and Gas Association. This withdrawal is being taken under section 110 
and parts C and D of the Federal Clean Air Act.

DATES: The proposed rule published on September 10, 2013 (78 FR 55234), 
is withdrawn as of January 8, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Adina Wiley (6PD-R), Air Permits 
Section, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue 
(6PD-R), Suite 1200, Dallas, TX 75202-2733. The telephone number is 
(214) 665-2115. Ms. Wiley can also be reached via electronic mail at 
wiley.adina@epa.gov.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    Dated: December 20, 2013.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2013-31569 Filed 1-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4845 

To suspend temporarily the duty on TFM. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on TFM. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TFM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 3-trifluoromethyl-4- 

nitrophenol (TFM) (CAS No. 

88–30–2) (provided for in 

subheading 2908.99.90) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4845 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
*** E.O. 12866 Review

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review ***



## Updated **NHTSA and EPA Responses to Interagency Line**  **Item Comments on H**  **DV Phase 2 NPRM Preamble Received** 

**on June 5**  **, 2015**

**NHTSA and EPA Response**  **:** The agencies believe we have s ubstantivel y concurred with these interagency

recommended edits, with only minor editorial revisions for clarity

. **Edits the Agencies Have**  **Confirmed are Present in the Current Preamble File**  **:** Page 46 : Deletion in the first bullet

. Agencies have confirmed this deletion in the Preamble. Page 48: Add a request for comment

. Agencies have confirmed that the Preamble now reads: “As discussed throughout this document, the agencies believe Alternative 4 has potential to be the maximum feasible alternative, however, based on the evidence currentl y before us, the agencies have outstanding questions regarding relative risks and benefits of that option in the timeframe envisioned. We are seeking comment on these relative risks and benefits. ” Page 219: EO12866 suggested e dits. Agencies have confirmed that the Preamble now reads: “ The agencies also regard these reductions as cost

- effective, even without considering pay back period. The agencies estimate the cost per metric ton of CO2eq reduction without considering fuel savings to be $20 in 2030, and we estimate the cost per gallon of avoided fuel consumption to be about $0.25 per gallon, which compares favorably

with the levels of cost effectiveness the agencies found to be re asonable for light duty trucks. Footnote: “ If using a cost effectiveness metric that treats fuel savings as a negative cost, net costs per ton of GHG emissions reduced or per gallon of avoided fuel consumption would be negativ e under the proposed standards.” Page 848: T echnical edits to re gulation

. Agencies have confirmed that the Regulation text in §1068.301 now reads: “ (d) Complete the appropriate EPA declaration form before importing any engines or equipment. These forms may be submitted and stored electronicall y and are available on the Internet at http://www.epa.gov/OTAQ/imports/ or by phone at 734

- 214

- 4100. Importers must keep the forms these records for five years and make them available promptl y upon request. ”
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

ECREDIT SOLUTIONS LLC, §

§

Plaintiff, § Case No. 6:20-cv-304-ADA

§

v. §

§

VYZE, INC., § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

§

Defendant. §

§

§

ORDER 

 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss. Having reviewed the briefings 

of the parties, the Court GRANTS the motion. 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT Plaintiff’s claims are hereby dismissed with prejudice, and 

Defendant’s counterclaims are hereby dismissed without prejudice. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT each party bear its own costs and fees. 

 The Clerk is directed to close the case. 

 SO ORDERED.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We
consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Oragenics, Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2011, with respect to the 2010 financial statements of Oragenics, Inc. We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8
Registration Statements (Nos. 333-110646, 333-150716 and 333-163083) of Oragenics, Inc. pertaining to the Oragenics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan;



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
|                             
|Certified Public Accountants 
|                             
|Clearwater, Florida          
|                             
|March 25, 2011
#### PREMIER PETROLEUM CO. v. BOX.

No. A-4082.

Supreme Court of Texas.

April 15, 1953.

Rehearing Denied May 13, 1953.

Turner & Seaberry, Eastland, for petitioner.

Scarborough, Yates, Scarborough & Black, Abilene, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The two points of error in petitioner’s application for writ of error present in different form the same question, thus .stated by the second point: “The Court of Civil Appeals erred in holding that petitioner is liable for damages shown to have been suffered by Box regardless of any negligence by petitioner.”

•We approve the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals on that question. 255 S.W.2d 298. See also Meyer v. Cox, Tex.Civ.App., 252 S.W.2d 207, in which application for writ of error was refused.

Several other questions were decided by the Court of Civil Appeals, but no points in the application attack the decision of those questions, and we have no jurisdiction of them. Hence, the application is refused, no reversible error.'
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Julien Signès, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Envivio, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Julien SignèsJulien SignèsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 29, 2015
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                                                      
|No chart available.                                                                                      
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Nebraska Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

June 5, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 134070 (15) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices WALTER GIVANS, #239124

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 134070 CoA: 276852 PAROLE BOARD,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $110.00, shall s ubmit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order. Failure to comply wi th this order shall res ult in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partia l fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $265.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file furth er appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of th is order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 5, 2007

Clerk
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5234 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bayhydur XP 2547. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bayhydur XP 2547. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BAYHYDUR XP 2547. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5234 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 A water-dispersible 

polyisocyanate product 

based on hexamethylene 

diisocyanate (HDI) trimer 

(CAS No. 28182–81–2) 

and Cyclohexanamine, 

N,N-dimethyl-, compds. 

with 3-(cyclohexylamino)-1- 

propanesulfonic acidblocked 1,6- 

diisocyanatohexane 

homopolymer (CAS No. 

666723–27–9) (Bayhydur 

XP 2547) (provided for in 

subheading 3911.90.90) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

Memo 

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

From: Joseph McDonald, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD 

CC: Ed Nam, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD 

Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 

Re: ANL BatPaC Model 

The attached spreadsheet entitled “ANL BatPaC Model Beta.xls” contains the initial beta version of the 

Argonne National Laboratory Battery Performance and Cost Model along with default sample input 

variables.