alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Frampton, Appellant, *v.*Pierce.

*Elections*— Ballot—Objection *to name on ballot*— Bill *in equity.*

Where a bill in equity to enjoin the county commissioners from printing the name of a certain candidate upon the official ballot to be voted for at a primary election was dismissed by the lower court a few days before such election, the question raised on an appeal from such decree taken six months thereafter is purely academic and the appeal will be quashed.

Argued Sept. 28, 1915.

Appeal, No. 27, Oct. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from decree of O. P. Clarion Co., in Equity, May T., 1914, No. 3, dissolving preliminary injunction *187in. case of B. H. Frampton v. J. K. Pierce, Peter Zacherl and D. C. Hindman, County Commissioners of the County of Clarion, and B. W. Thompson.

October 28, 1915:

Before Brown, C. J., Mestrezat, Potter, Stewart, Moschzisker and Frazer, JJ.

Appeal quashed.

Bill in Equity to enjoin the County Commissioners from printing the names of certain candidates on an official ballot. Before King, P. J., specially presiding.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

The lower court dissolved a preliminary injunction which it had granted. Plaintiff appealed.

*Error assigned,*among others, was the decree of the court.

*J. V. Frampton,*for appellant.

*A. A. Geary,*with him *Don O. Oorbett, H. E. Hugh*and TP. TP. *Hindman,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

The question raised on this appeal is now purely academic. The bill of the complainant sought to enjoin the county commissioners of Clarion County from printing the name of B. W. Thompson upon the official ballot to be voted for at the primary election May 19, 1914, as a candidate for the office of chairman of the Democratic County Committee of said county. The bill was dismissed May 11, 1914. The primary election was held eight days later, and this appeal was taken November 11,1914, — just sis months after the dismissal of the bill. Even if the court erred in its decree — which we do not intimate — a reversal of it would not now, in any manner, profit the appellant.

Appeal quashed.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 12(b)


           UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY
                             AND AFFILIATE COMPANIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                   (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              Nine Months Ended Sept. 30,
Millions, Except Ratios                                                                2001             2000
<S>                                                                            <C>                   <C>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings:
     Net income........................................................               $ 757            $ 752
     Undistributed equity earnings.....................................                 (34)              44
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Total earnings....................................................                 723              796
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income taxes...........................................................                 450              429
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed charges:
     Interest expense including amortization of debt discount..........                 441              444
     Portion of rentals representing an interest factor................                  30              127
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Total fixed charges...............................................                 471              571
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings available for fixed charges...................................             $ 1,644          $ 1,796
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.....................................                 3.5              3.1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR

CHOICE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GREG ABBOTT, in his official capacity as

Governor of Texas, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:20-cv-00323-LY

NOTICE OF RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(i) DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs hereby dismiss all

claims against all Defendants in this case.

Dated: March 5, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Patrick J. O’Connell

Patrick J. O’Connell

Texas Bar No. 15179900

Law Offices of Patrick J. O’Connell PLLC

5926 Balcones Dr., Ste. 220

Austin, Texas 78731

(512) 852-5918

pat@pjofca.com

Attorney for All Plaintiffs

Julie Murray*

Hannah Swanson*

PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION

OF AMERICA

1110 Vermont Ave., NW Ste. 300

Washington, D.C. 20005

(202) 973-4800

julie.murray@ppfa.org

hannah.swanson@ppfa.org
Jennifer Sandman*

PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION

OF AMERICA

123 William Street

New York, NY 10038

(212) 541-7800

jennifer.sandman@ppfa.org

Attorneys for Planned Parenthood Center for

Choice, Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas

Surgical Health Services, and Planned

Parenthood South Texas Surgical Center

Molly Duane*

Rabia Muqaddam*

CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS

199 Water St., 22nd Floor

New York, NY 10038

(917) 637-3631

mduane@reprorights.org

rmuqaddam@reprorights.org

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Southwestern

Women’s Surgery Center, Brookside Women’s

Medical Center PA d/b/a Brookside Women’s

Health Center and Austin Women’s Health

Center, Robin Wallace, M.D., Alamo City

Surgery Center PLLC d/b/a Alamo Women’s

Reproductive Services, and Houston

Women’s Reproductive Services

Stephanie Toti

Rupali Sharma*

Sneha Shah*

LAWYERING PROJECT

25 Broadway, Fl. 9

New York, NY 10004

(646) 490-1083

stoti@lawyeringproject.org

rsharma@lawyeringproject.org

sshah@lawyeringproject.org

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Whole Woman’s

Health and Whole Woman’s Health Alliance

Andre Segura, TX Bar No. 24107112*

2
ACLU FOUNDATION OF TEXAS, INC.

5225 Katy Freeway, Suite 350

Houston, TX 77007

Tel. (713) 942-8146

Fax: (713) 942-8966

asalvador@aclutx.org

asegura@aclutx.org

Brigitte Amiri*

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION

FOUNDATION

125 Broad Street, 18th Floor

New York, NY 10004

Tel. (212) 549-2600

bamiri@aclu.org

Attorneys for Plaintiff Houston Women’s

Center

*Admitted Pro Hac Vice

3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on March 5, 2021, I filed a copy of the foregoing with this Court’s CM/ECF

system, which will serve a copy on all attorneys of record.

/s/ Julie Murray

Julie Murray

4
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the amended annual report of Data Call Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Larry Mosley, CFO and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Larry Mosley

Larry MosleyCFO and DirectorDated: September 25, 2008

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Data Call Technologies, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-50246

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDGAR ANTUNEZ-PEREZ, also known as Edgar Julian Antunez, also known 

as Edgar Perez, also known as Carlos Garcia Rodriguez, also known as Carlos 

Hernandez-Garcia, also known as Edgar Antunez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:13-CR-496-1

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar AntunezPerez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Antunez-Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-50246 Document: 00512873655 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2014
No. 14-50246

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-50246 Document: 00512873655 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2014
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5387 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Solvent Orange 115. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Ms. FUDGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Solvent Orange 

115. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SOLVENT ORANGE 115. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Solvent Orange 115 (CAS 

No. 53304–32–8) (provided for in subheading 

3204.19.25) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5387 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 55-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 1 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 55-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 2 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 55-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 3 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 55-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 4 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 55-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 5 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 55-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 6 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 55-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 7 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 55-1 Filed 12/03/20 Page 8 of 8
June 12, 2015 

Mr. Stephen Valiquet 

P.O. Box 85 

Bradford, NH 03221 

Dear Mr. Valiquet: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 1, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

2023), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
|                                                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                              
|                                                                                                           
|No chart available.                                                                                        
|No chart available.                                                                                        
|                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                           
|Louisiana--South Onshore Shale Proved Reserves New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5484 

To suspend temporarily the duty on light emitting diode (LED) drivers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on light emitting diode 

(LED) drivers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) DRIVERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5484 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Light emitting diode 

(LED) drivers which contain diodes, transistors and 

other semiconductor material designed to work with 

an LED array to deliver 

constant current and to 

prevent transients of current from damaging the 

LED, specifically designed 

to withstand extreme temperatures of 55 °C at a 

case temperature of 80 °C 

and a full operating ambient temperature range of 

¥40 °C to 55 °C, offering 

at least 50,000 hours operating life in whole temperature range (provided 

for in subheading 

8504.40.95) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5137 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5137

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain brass lamp-holder 
                               housings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain brass lamp-holder 
                               housings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN BRASS LAMP-HOLDER HOUSINGS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.32 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain brass lamp-holder 
housings) is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, 

 Plaintiff 

-vVMWARE INC., 

 Defendant

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

A-20-CV-00457-ADA 

 

ORDER TO PAY TECHNICAL ADVISOR 

The Court previously appointed Dr. Joshua J. Yi to serve as a technical advisor on this 

case. The Court has reviewed Dr. Yi’s invoice for services through December 31, 2020 and finds 

the requested amount ($31,275.00) to be reasonable and necessary. As such, the Court ORDERS

payment to be promptly made as follows: 

Plaintiffs: $15,637.50 

Defendant: $15,637.50 

Dr. Yi will separately provide deposit instructions. 

SIGNED this 1st day of January, 2021. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:20-cv-00457-ADA Document 56 Filed 01/04/21 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                              
|                                                                                                           
|Louisiana State Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                           
|Louisiana State Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 102    | 182    | 17     | 109    | 63     | 30     | 27     | 52     | 5      | 4     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 44     | 144    | 9      | 0      | 21     | 6      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023