alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub L. 92-                          ( print page 58828)                        463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:                

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Integrative Activities (1373).                    

*Date and Time:*                         November 15, 2000, 7 p.m.-9 p.m., November 16-17, 2000, 8:30 a.m.- 5:30 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Rooms 130, 220, 340, 360, 365, 370, 380, 470, 530, 580, and 730, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts, Director, Office of Integative Activities, Room 1270, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA 22230; Telephone: (703) 292-8040.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate preproposals submitted to the Science and Technology Centers: Integrative Partnerships Program.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The meeting is closed to the public because the Panel is reviewing proposal actions that will include privileged intellectual property and personal information that could harm individuals if they were disclosed. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) of the Government Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: September 27, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-25218 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
**Exhibit
      99.4**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB of
      Standard Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the three months ended November
      30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, B. Gordon Brooke, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer
      and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.




Date:
      January 3, 2008





GORDON
      BROOKE


B.
      Gordon
      Brooke


Chief
      Accounting Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer and Director










-1-
#### HUFFMAN v. STATE.

No. 25646.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty.,. of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction as an habitual offender, with punishment assessed at life imprisonment in the penitentiary, as provided by Art. 63, P.C., the primary offense charged being that of burglary.

No statement of facts or bills of exception accompany the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court
Opinion issued October 17, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00944-CV

———————————

STEPHEN MCLEMORE, III, Appellant

V.

PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2012-10964

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a default judgment signed August 3, 2012. 

No motion for new trial was filed. Appellant, Stephen McLemore, filed his notice 

of appeal on October 3, 2012.
2

If no timely motion for new trial is filed, the notice of appeal is due within 

30 days after the judgment is signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. In a restricted appeal, 

however, the notice of appeal must be filed within six months after the judgment is 

signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(c). A restricted appeal is available to a party who did 

not participate, either in person or through counsel, in the hearing that resulted in 

the judgment complained of and who did not timely file a postjudgment motion or 

request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. TEX. R. APP. P. 30.

Appellant’s notice of appeal does not comply with the requirements for 

proceeding as a restricted appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(d)(7). Specifically, the 

notice (1) does not “state that the appellant is a party affected by the trial court’s 

judgment but did not participate—either in person or through counsel—in the 

hearing that resulted in the judgment complained of,” (2) does not “state that the 

appellant did not timely file either a postjudgment motion, request for findings of 

fact and conclusions of law, or notice of appeal,” and (3) is not verified by 

appellant. Id.

On July 19, 2013, this Court notified appellant of his failure to comply with 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1 and instructed appellant to file an 

amended notice of appeal within 10 days of the date of the notice. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.1(g). Appellant was also notified that failure to file an amended notice 
3

of appeal would result in dismissal of his appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Appellant did not file an amended notice of appeal.

Additionally, appellant has neither paid the required fees nor established 

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order 

Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of 

Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket 

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). 

After being notified on May 3, 2013 that this appeal was subject to dismissal, 

appellant did not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and for 

nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Massengale.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #11-2002 Ltd. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

                                       /s/ Freddie M. Kotek
                                       Freddie M. Kotek
                                       Chief Executive Officer of the Managing
                                       General Partner
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1347

CLAUDIA LOURDES GRANADOS-RUIZ,

 Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: March 15, 2024 Decided: June 17, 2024

Before GREGORY and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: James Doyle Brousseau, BROUSSEAU & LEE, PLLC, Falls Church, 

Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, 

Anthony P. Nicastro, Assistant Director, Timothy Bo Stanton, Office of Immigration 

Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, 

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1347 Doc: 28 Filed: 06/17/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Claudia Granados-Ruiz, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of 

an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the Immigration 

Judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under 

the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and Granados-Ruiz’s 

claims and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the 

administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence 

supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Granados-Ruiz (B.I.A. Mar. 3, 2023). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1347 Doc: 28 Filed: 06/17/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Suite 1500

700 Fifth Avenue

Seattle, Washington 98104-5044

Tel:. (206) 292-1800

Fax: (206) 343-7809

Deloitte& Touche

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REPORT ON 

COMPLIANCE WITH UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION

PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS

 

Board of**Directors Washington Mutual, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion about Washington Mutual, Inc. and subsidiaries' (the Company) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's *Uniform Single Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers* as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

February 18, 2003
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  November 9, 2009
    /s/ Carl J. GrivnerCarl J. GrivnerChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
RE: Proven Networks, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al

 1:20-CV-498-ADA, Formerly Case No. 6:20-CV-266-ADA

Dear Counsel:

This is to advise you that the above captioned case has been transferred from the Western

District of Texas, Waco Division, and filed in this office on May 8, 2020.

The case has been given case number 1:20-CV-498-ADA and assigned to the Honorable Alan D. 

Albright. It is requested that all future pleadings reflect the case number assigned in this court 

and that they be filed in the Office of the Clerk at the above address.

Please be sure to review the Local Rules for the Western District of Texas, standing orders for 

the Austin Division, and the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing. The 

E-Filing and E-Noticing Registration Form and various other forms are available on our 

website www.txwd.uscourts.gov. 

If you have any questions regarding the above information, please do not hesitate to call our 

office at (512) 916-5896.

Sincerely,

Deputy Clerk/CJ

JEANNETTE J. CLACK

CLERK OF COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS PHILIP J. DEVLIN

501 West 5th Street, Ste. 1100 CHIEF DEPUTY

Austin, TX 78701

May 8, 2020

Case 1:20-cv-00498-ADA Document 22 Filed 05/08/20 Page 1 of 1
|   | 1. | I      have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K of      Oragenics, Inc.; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  April      26, 2010 |   | /s/Brian B. Bohunicky        |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                                 |   | Brian      Bohunicky         |
|                                 |   | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 194 (Thursday, October 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59463-59464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NM-930-1430-ET; NMNM 52408, NMNM 52409, NMNM 52410]


Public Land Order No. 7462; Revocation of Three Secretarial 
Orders dated May 1, 1929, April 27, 1939, and May 24, 1939; New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order revokes three Secretarial orders in their entirety 
as to the remaining 240 acres of lands withdrawn for Air Navigation 
Site Nos. 29, 125, and 128. The lands are not needed for the purpose 
for which they were withdrawn. Eighty acres have been conveyed out of 
Federal ownership and revocation of the withdrawal on those lands is a 
record-clearing action only. The remaining 160 acres will be opened to 
all forms of appropriation under the public land laws.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 6, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanette Espinosa, BLM New Mexico 
State Office, 1474 Rodeo Road, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502, 505-438-
7597.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1994), it is ordered as follows:
    1. The Secretarial Orders dated April 27, 1939 and May 24, 1939, 
which withdrew lands for Air Navigation Site Nos. 125, and 128 are 
hereby revoked in their entirety as to the remaining lands described 
below:

New Mexico Principal Meridian

T. 4 S., R. 1 E.,
    Sec. 10, NW\1/4\SW\1/4\.
T. 13 S., R. 1 W.,
    Sec. 7, E\1/2\SW\1/4\;
    Sec. 18, NE\1/4\NW\1/4\.

    The areas described aggregate 160 acres in Sierra and Socorro 
Counties.
    2. The Secretarial Order dated May 1, 1929, which withdrew lands 
for Air Navigation Site No. 29, is hereby revoked in its entirety as to 
the remaining lands described below:

T. 4 N., R. 18 E.,
    Sec. 13, NW\1/4\SW\1/4\.
T. 3 N., R. 23 E.,
    Sec. 3, SE\1/4\NW\1/2\.

    The areas described aggregate 80 acres in Guadalupe and De Baca 
Counties.
    3. At 10 a.m. on November 6, 2000, the lands described in paragraph 
1 will be opened to all forms of appropriation under the public land 
laws.

[[Page 59464]]

    4. The land described in paragraph 2 has been conveyed out of 
Federal ownership and this is a record-clearing action only for those 
lands.

    Dated: September 12, 2000
Sylvia V. Baca,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 00-25579 Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
JENNIFER HILL, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED

, Appellant,

v.

THE HOOVER COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS IN ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND HOOVER COMPANY, I, A FOREIGN CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS IN ALACHUA C OUNTY, FLORIDA

, Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 0539

_____________________________/

Opinion file d November 6, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Toby S. Monaco , Judge

.
Paul S. Rothstein, Gainesville , for Appellant.

James Andrew Bertron, Jr., Tallahassee; Keith Hutto, Rachel M. Flynn, and Chris Genovese, Columbia, SC , for Ap pellee s

.PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, MARSTILLER

, and SWANSON

, J J

. , CONCUR.

2
EXHIBIT A

Case 1:20-cv-00485-RP Document 1-1 Filed 05/05/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-00485-RP Document 1-1 Filed 05/05/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 195 (Friday, October 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59821-59822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Additions to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List services to be 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

[[Page 59822]]


EFFECTIVE DATE: November 6, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, VA 22202-3259.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louis R. Bartalot, (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 30, August 11, and 18, 2000 the 
Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled 
published notices (65 FR 40607, 49217 and 50499) of proposed additions 
to the Procurement List. After consideration of the material presented 
to it concerning capability of qualified nonprofit agencies to provide 
the services and impact of the additions on the current or most recent 
contractors, the Committee has determined that the services listed 
below are suitable for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 
U.S.C. 46-48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the services to the 
Government.
    2. The action will not have a severe economic impact on current 
contractors for the services.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the services to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the services proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Accordingly, the following services are hereby added to the 
Procurement List:

Base Supply Center, Operation of Individual Equipment Element Store and 
HAZMART

MacDill Air Force Base, Florida

Janitorial/Custodial

Defense Systems Management College (DSMC), 9820 Belvoir Road, Fort 
Belvoir, Virginia

Wheelchair Maintenance

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 800 Zorn Avenue, Louisville, Kentucky

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
effective date of this addition or options that may be exercised under 
those contracts.

Rita L. Wells,
Deputy Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 00-25786 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P