alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Consent of Independent Accountants    
  



We hereby consent to the use, in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-63328) of our report dated March 1, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedules of Protective Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the use in this Registration Statement of our
report dated March 22, 2001, on our audit of the financial statements of The Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement. 



	 	/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 





Birmingham, Alabama

September 18, 2001 









QuickLinks


Consent of Independent Accountants
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION

TERRY MEEKS,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

IBN UTHMAN KEARSE, et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

MO:20-CV-00113-RCG

FINAL JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED the above-styled and numbered cause is DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and based upon the Joint 

Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice filed on August 30, 2022. (Doc. 77). 

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ENTERS FINAL JUDGMENT as follows:

It is ORDERED that the claims in this matter are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

It is further ORDERED attorney fees, expenses and court costs shall be borne by the 

party incurring same, except as otherwise provided in the settlement agreement.

It is further ORDERED that all other relief not expressly granted herein is DENIED.

It is finally ORDERED that all pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT.

The Court VACATES the Final Pretrial Hearing and Trial Setting, if any.

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED this 15th day of September, 2022.

RONALD C. GRIFFIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00113-RCG Document 78 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.1

	
	

GENIUS GROUP LIMITED
Company Registration No. 201541844C
Incorporated in Singapore under the Companies Act. Cap. 50

 Registered Office:  8 AMOY STREET,                              Certificate No.:  [CERTIFICATE NO]
#01-01,
SINGAPORE 049950        No. of Shares:  [NO OF SHARES]




This is to certify that

Is the Registered Holder(s) of [NO OF SHARES IN WORDS] Ordinary Shares, fully paid in Genius Group Limited,
subject to the Constitution of the Company.

Given under the Common Seal of the Company on [DATE].
                ____________________________________
          Director


          ____________________________________
             Director/Secretary

Note: No transfer of any portion of the shares comprised in this Certificate will be registered unless accompanied by this Certificate
[ENTITY NAME]
 (ENTITY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)
[ADDRESS]
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4167 — Mitsui/Vopak)

(2006/C 145/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 June 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
|   | Exhibit      32.01 |
|--------|--------------------|

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August      5, 2008      |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                      |   |
|  /s/William      B. Timmerman        |   |
| William      B. Timmerman                 |   |
| Chairman      of the Board, President and |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer              |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Upstream Biosciences Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     (1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K (Amendment No. 1) of the Company for
          the year ended September 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with
          the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: May 29, 2012       By: /s/ Charles El-Moussa
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                              Charles El-Moussa
                              Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
                              Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer and
                              Director
                              (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
                              Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Upstream Biosciences Inc. and will
be retained by Upstream Biosciences Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5298 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5298

To suspend temporarily the duty on petroleum resins, coumarone, indene 
               or coumarone-indene resins; polyterpenes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Roe of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on petroleum resins, coumarone, indene 
               or coumarone-indene resins; polyterpenes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PETROLEUM RESINS, COUMARONE, INDENE OR COUMARONE-INDENE 
              RESINS; POLYTERPENES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Petroleum resins,   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          coumarone, indene                                                 12/31/2015
                          or coumarone-
                          indene resins;
                          polyterpenes
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3911.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered January ~ 2013

In The

Court of ppeaI 

 ifth istritt of gexa at aIla 

Nos. 05-12-00261-CR

05-12-00738-CR

05-12-00739-CR

ERICH DOUGLAS LEE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. Fll-41203-H

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s second motion for extension of time to file its brief. We

GRANT the motion. The time to file the State’s brief is extended to January 9, 2013. We

ORDER the State’s brief tendered on January 9, of the of this order.

JUSTICE
<TABLE>
                                                                                                                   EXHIBIT 12
                       SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                               Dollars in Millions


                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                              MARCH 31,                            YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
<CAPTION>
                                        -----------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------
                                             1999        1998        1998       1997         1996         1995         1994
                                        -----------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                       <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>

Income Before Income Taxes and
Extraordinary Loss                        $    737    $    639   $   2,410   $   1,888    $   2,168   $    1,688   $    1,586
     Add:Interest Expense                       94          89         374         343          327          340          358
         1/3 Rental Expense                     12          10          45          41           33           26           25
                                          ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------   ----------  -----------  -----------

     Adjusted Earnings                    $    843    $    738   $   2,829   $   2,272    $   2,528   $    2,054   $    1,969
                                          =========   =========  ==========  ==========   ==========  ===========  ===========

Total Interest Charges                    $     98    $     96   $     392   $     370    $     348   $      340   $      358
1/3 Rental Expense                              12          10          45          41           33           26           25
                                          ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------   ----------  -----------  -----------

     Adjusted Fixed Charges               $    110    $    106   $     437   $     411    $     381   $      366   $      383
                                          =========   =========  ==========  ==========   ==========  ===========  ===========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges            7.66        6.96        6.47        5.53         6.64         5.61         5.14

</TABLE>
Order entered May 27 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00168
- CV
CHERYL DENISE SCHULDENBERG , Appellant
V. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUBROGEE FOR KURT S. JOHNSON AND LAURA KLINGER , Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 19
- 15270

O RDER The reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated April
1 6 , 2021 , we informed appellant the court repor ter notified us that the reporter’s

reco rd had not been filed because appellant had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid fo r o r made arrangements to pay for the record. We directed appellant to provide the Court with written verification showing the reporter’s record had been requested and that appellant had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the
record or had been foun d e ntitled to proceed without payment of costs. Wecautioned appellant that failure to p r ovide the required documentation withi n ten

days might result in the appeal be ing ordered submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has not provide d t he Court with documentation showing she has requested the reporter’s record, nor other w ise corresponded with the Court regard ing the status of the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. Appellants’ br ief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JU STICE
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southwest WaterCompany (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Anton C. Garnier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to my knowledge that:

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:     | August 9,  2005 |                        |   | /s/  ANTON C. GARNIER |   |
|------------|----------------------|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|       |                 | **Anton C. Garnier**        |
| ** ** | ** **           | **Chief Executive Officer** |

 

1

----
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF IDEX BIOMETRICS ASA 

Corp. ID no. NO 976 846 923 VAT 

(last amended on 20 August 2021) 
  

	§  1	 The name of the company is IDEX Biometrics ASA and it is a public limited company. 



 

	§  2	 The objective of the Company is to deliver identification systems and other activities related to this.



  

	§  3	 The business offices are in the Oslo municipality, Norway. 



 

	§  4	 The company’s shares shall be registered in the Norwegian Registry of Securities. 



 

	§  5	 The share capital is NOK 137,789,098.50 divided into 918,593,990 shares each with a nominal value of NOK 0.15
per share and issued in name. 


  

	§  6	 The board of the Company consists of from three to seven members in accordance with the annual general
meeting’s instruction. 


  

	§  7	 The annual general meeting shall convene in or near Oslo at the board’s decision, and shall consider:



  

	 	•	 	 Determination of the annual financial statements 



 

	 	•	 	 Appropriation of (net) profit or covering of losses 



 

	 	•	 	 Election of chair of the board and board members 



 

	 	•	 	 Election of chair and members of the nomination committee 



 

	 	•	 	 Election of auditor 


  

	 	•	 	 Determination of remuneration to the board of directors, members of the nomination committee and the auditor



  

	 	•	 	 Other matters which are governed by law 



 

	 	•	 	 Other matters which are mentioned in the notice of the annual general meeting. 



 

	§  8	 a. The company shall have a nomination committee. The nomination committee shall have three members, including
a chairman. Members of the nomination committee shall be elected by the annual general meeting for a term of two years. 



b. The nomination committee shall: 
  

	 	•	 	 Propose candidates for election to the board of directors 



 

	 	•	 	 Propose the remuneration to be paid to the board members 



 

	 	•	 	 Propose candidates for election to the nomination committee 



 

	 	•	 	 Propose the remuneration to be paid to the nomination committee members 



c. The guidelines for the nomination committee shall be resolved by the annual general meeting. 

 

	§  9	 Documents which timely have been made available on the Internet site of the company and which deal with matters
that are to be considered at the general meeting need not be sent to the company’s shareholders. 


  

	§  10	 As a general rule, the company’s general meetings shall be conducted in Norwegian. The general meeting may
however resolve by a simple majority vote that English shall be used. Shareholders may present their points of view in the Norwegian or English language. 


  

	§  11	 A shareholder who wishes to attend the general meeting, in person or by proxy, shall notify his/her attendance
to the company no later than 2 days prior to the general meeting. If the shareholder does not notify the company of his/her attendance in a timely manner, the company may deny him/her access to the general meeting.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5530 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5530

  To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain woven fabrics of 
  synthetic staple fibers, containing 85 percent or more by weight of 
                        polyester staple fibers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

Mr. Young of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain woven fabrics of 
  synthetic staple fibers, containing 85 percent or more by weight of 
                        polyester staple fibers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF SYNTHETIC STAPLE FIBERS, CONTAINING 
              85 PERCENT OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF POLYESTER STAPLE FIBERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Certain woven       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          fabrics of                                                        12/31/2015
                          synthetic staple
                          fibers,
                          containing 85
                          percent or more
                          by weight of
                          polyester staple
                          fibers (provided
                          for in subheading
                          5512.19.00 ).....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BISMARCK M. BRITO

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 881

[ June 11, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Rosemarie Scher

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502018CF010970A

.

Michael P. Mirer, Miami, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, G ERBER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-20-00192-CV 

________________________

NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC. F/K/A CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC., 

AND CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC., PETITIONERS 

 

V. 

 

PETER BALDERAS AND MARTHA BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

ON BEHALF OF THEIR INJURED AND DECEASED MINOR CHILDREN, 

P.B., JR. AND E.B., INJURED MINORS, AND F.B., J.B., J.B., AND Y.B., DECEASED 

MINOR CHILDREN, AND JACQUELINE BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND 

CASANDRA BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY, RESPONDENTS 

 

On Petition for Permissive Appeal from the 108th District Court 

Potter County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 106,846-E-CV; Honorable Doug Woodburn, Presiding 

 

September 14, 2020 

 

ORDER DENYING PERMISSIVE APPEAL 

Before PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

Pending before this court is the Petition for Interlocutory Appeal filed by Petitioners, 

Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. (f/k/a Crop Production Services, Inc.) and Crop Production 

Services, Inc., seeking permission to appeal the trial court’s Amended Order Denying 
2

Defendant Nutrien’s Amended No-Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment and 

Amended Order Denying Defendant Nutrien’s Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment. 

Respondents have filed an objection to the petition.

To be entitled to a permissive appeal from an interlocutory order not otherwise 

appealable, the petitioner must establish that (1) the order appealed involves “a 

controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of 

opinion” and (2) immediate appeal from the order “may materially advance the ultimate 

termination of the litigation.” TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d) (West Supp. 

2019); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3(e)(4). Because the petition fails to establish each of these

requirements, we deny the petition for permissive appeal.

Per Curiam
----

----

|             |   |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ Ziv Haft                        |
|------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|             |   |   |   |   |   |   | Certified Public Accountants (Isr.) |
|             |   |   |   |   |   |   | BDO Member Firm                     |
| Tel-Aviv, Israel |   |   |   |   |   |   |                                |
| April 15, 2011   |   |   |   |   |   |   |                                |   |   |

----

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

                    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called the optional “peg” rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. This                           ( print page 59883)                        rate will be 6.125 (6                    1/8                    ) percent for the October—December quarter of FY 2001.                 

LeAnn M. Oliver,

Deputy Associate Administrator for Financial Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 00-25798 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-U