alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5110 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Methylimidazole. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. HIMES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Methylimidazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1-METHYLIMIDAZOLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1-Methylimidazole (CAS 

No. 616–47–7) (provided 

for in subheading 

2933.29.90) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5110 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

1 See United States v. Davis, 61 F.3d 291, 303-04 (5th Cir.

1995) cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 961 (1996).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20717

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT ARTHUR HALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 95-CR-201

- - - - - - - - - -

May 22, 1997

Before Wisdom, King, and Smith, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Arthur Hall appeals his conviction for being a felon

in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(1). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in failing to sua

sponte order a competency hearing because Hall did not raise a

“bona fide doubt” as to his competence.1 This court cannot

address his ineffective assistance of counsel claim because the
No. 96-20717

- 2 -

2 See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir.

1987).

3 See Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(f); United States v. Harrelson,

705 F.2d 733, 738 (5th Cir. 1983).

record is not sufficiently complete to fairly evaluate the merits

of such a claim.2 Hall cannot raise an illegal search and

seizure claim because he did not file a timely motion to suppress

and such failure constitutes a waiver of the issue.3

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5241 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5241

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain plasticizers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain plasticizers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASTICIZERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.61 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain plasticizers) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-31;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. Lamale
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 19-14844

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00080-KD-B-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

TARAS HODIVSKY, JR., 

a.k.a. Taras Hodivsky, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(September 4, 2020)

Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver 

in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 

Case: 19-14844 Date Filed: 09/04/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2

1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was 

made knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 

1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the 

right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).

Case: 19-14844 Date Filed: 09/04/2020 Page: 2 of 2
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Kentucky Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Kentucky Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 45     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | W      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4870 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4870

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain non-toric shaped polarized 
               materials of more than 80 mm in diameter.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Campbell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain non-toric shaped polarized 
               materials of more than 80 mm in diameter.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NON-TORIC SHAPED POLARIZED MATERIALS OF MORE THAN 80 MM IN 
              DIAMETER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Polarized lenses,   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          lens blanks,                                                      12/31/2015
                          wafers, sheets or
                          plates consisting
                          of polyvinyl
                          alcohol (PVA) and
                          polycarbonate to
                          be used in the
                          production of
                          lenses for
                          sunglasses, not
                          toric-shaped,
                          with an outer
                          profile diameter
                          of more than 80
                          mm (provided for
                          in subheadings
                          9001.20.00,
                          9001.50.00, or
                          9001.90.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 525 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to enhance and 

increase the number of veterinarians trained in veterinary public health. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 525 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterinary Public 

3 Health Amendments Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF VETERINARY PUBLIC HEALTH IN 

5 CERTAIN PUBLIC HEALTH WORKFORCE PRO6 VISIONS. 

7 (a) PUBLIC HEALTH WORKFORCE GRANTS.—Sub8 sections (b)(1)(A) and (d)(6) of section 765 of the Public 

9 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295) are amended by in10 serting ‘‘veterinary public health,’’ after ‘‘preventive medi11 cine,’’ each place it appears. 

12 (b) PUBLIC HEALTH WORKFORCE LOAN REPAY13 MENT PROGRAM.— 

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraphs (A) and (B) 

15 of section 776(b)(1) of the Public Health Service 

16 Act (42 U.S.C. 295f–1(b)(1)) are amended by strik17 ing ‘‘public health or health professions degree or 

18 certificate’’ each place it appears and inserting 

19 ‘‘public health (including veterinary public health) or 

20 health professions degree or certificate’’. 

21 (2) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Subparagraph 

22 (A) of section 776(b)(1) of the Public Health Service 

23 Act (42 U.S.C. 295f–1(b)(1)) is amended by adding 

24 ‘‘or’’ at the end. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 525 RFS 

1 (c) DEFINITION.—Section 799B of the Public Health 

2 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295p) is amended by adding at 

3 the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(27) VETERINARY PUBLIC HEALTH.—The 

5 term ‘veterinary public health’ includes veterinarians 

6 engaged in one or more of the following areas to the 

7 extent such areas have an impact on human health: 

8 biodefense and emergency preparedness, emerging 

9 and reemerging infectious diseases, environmental 

10 health, ecosystem health, pre- and post-harvest food 

11 protection, regulatory medicine, diagnostic labora12 tory medicine, veterinary pathology, biomedical re13 search, the practice of food animal medicine in rural 

14 areas, and government practice.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 8, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
# Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased

Equipment Costs:

Clarifiers

Purchased Equipment Costs are the sum of the following cost elements:

(1) Pump Costs

(2) Tank Costs

(3) Chemical Feed System Costs

(4) Mixer Costs

(5) Clarifier Costs

(6) Filter Press Costs

(7) Sand Filter Costs

Each cost component includes the cost of freight and associated ancillary equipment such as

piping, valves, and controllers.

The fol lowing email supports EPA’s development of cost element (5) by documenting EPA's

communication with a vendor regarding purchase costs for solids contact clarifiers used in the

Steam Electric cost model.From: "Bill Sute" <bsute@walker

- process.com>

To: <Kavya.Kasturi@erg.com>

CC: "'Jeff Thomas'" <jthomas@walker

- process.com>, <gweverhart@comcast.net>

Date: 7/6/2011 11:35 AM

Subject: Cost request for solids contact clarifiers

Attachments: 3321_001.pdf; 3322_001.pdf

Kavya:

Jeff Thomas requested that I respond to your June 30, 2011 email to Greg

Everhart.

First of all, I did a quick online search and found the following link

which was quite informative:

http://www.powermag.com/water/Flue

- Gas

- Desulfurization

- Wastewater

- Treatm

ent

- Primer_1739.html.

With reference to the Secondary Clarification paragraph, I assumed an

overflow rate of 0.25 gpm/ft2 for sizing the solids contact clarifiers

below to be on the safe side.

For the 30 gpm flow rate, use a general budgetary cost estimate of

$65,000. The hei ght and diameter of the associated tank are 12'

- 6" and

15'

- 0", respectively. The weight of the clarifier is approximately

10,000 lbs.

For the 75 gpm flow rate, use a general budgetary cost estimate of

$80,000. The height and diameter of the associated ta nk are 13'

- 6" and

20'

- 0", respectively. The weight of the clarifier is approximately

13,000 lbs.

The solids contact clarifiers for the above flow rates are typically

illustrated in the attachments.

The above cost estimates do not include the cost of the clarifier tank

and ancillary equipment. The clarifier is made of carbon steel and comes

with Walker's standard primer coating.

Finally, Walker's solids contact clarifiers typically do not require

flash mix tanks and/or flocculation tanks prior to was tewater entering

the clarifier. However, as Walker is not all that familiar with the

chemistry involved upstream of the secondary clarifier as indicated in

the above link, Walker suggests that jar and/or pilot scale tests be

conducted on a case

- by

- case bas is to verify that the tanks are not

required.

Please let me know if you have questions on any of this.

Thank you.

Bill
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief FinancialOfficer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. § 1350)**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of SouthWestWater Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2008 (the “Report”), I, Cheryl L. Clary, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that:

 

1)             to my knowledge, the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)             the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  August 11, 2008 | /s/  CHERYL L. CLARY     |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                         | Cheryl  L. Clary         |
|                         | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-460

STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the parties stipulate to voluntary 

dismissal, without prejudice, of all of Plaintiff’s claims in the amended complaint (ECF No. 46). 

Each party has agreed to be responsible for its own attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. 

Respectfully submitted this February 11, 2021.

/s/ Joshua Smith

MARY WHITTLE

Texas Bar No. 24033336

MARK GUERRERO

Texas State Bar No. 24032377

GUERRERO & WHITTLE, PLLC

2630 Exposition Blvd., Ste. 102

Austin, Texas 78703

SIERRA CLUB,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF 

ENGINEERS, et al.,

Defendants,

and 

KINDER MORGAN TEXAS PIPELINE 

LLC, and PERMIAN HIGHWAY 

PIPELINE, LLC,

Intervenor-Defendants.

Case 1:20-cv-00460-RP Document 50 Filed 02/11/21 Page 1 of 4
Telephone: (512) 605-2300

Fax: (512) 222-5280

mary@gwjustice.com

mark@gwjustice.com

JOSHUA D. SMITH

Ore. Bar No. 071757 (pro hac vice)

SIERRA CLUB

2101 Webster Street, Suite 1300

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (415) 977-5560

Fax: (510) 208-3140

joshua.smith@sierraclub.org

REBECCA L. MCCREARY 

Colo. Bar No. 54097 (pro hac vice)

SIERRA CLUB

1650 38th Street, Suite 102W

Boulder, Colorado 80301

Telephone: (303) 449-5595

Fax: (303) 449-6520

rebecca.mccreary@sierraclub.org

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

JEAN E. WILLIAMS 

DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL

/s/Jeffrey Neel Candrian_______________

JEFFREY NEEL CANDRIAN

Colorado Bar No. 43839

DEVON LEHMAN McCUNE

Colorado Bar No. 33223

United States Department of Justice

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division

Natural Resources Section

999 18th Street, South Terrace, Suite 370

Denver, CO 80202

(303) 844-1487 (McCune)

(303) 844-1382 (Candrian)

(303) 844-1350-Fax

Email: Devon.McCune@usdoj.gov

Email: Jeffrey.Candrian@usdoj.gov

ATTORNEYS FOR FEDERAL 

DEFENDANTS

Case 1:20-cv-00460-RP Document 50 Filed 02/11/21 Page 2 of 4
/s/ W. Stephen Benesh___________

W. Stephen Benesh

Texas State Bar No. 02132050

111 Congress Avenue, Suite 2300

Austin, Texas 78701-4061

Telephone: (512) 494-3680

Facsimile: (800) 404-3970

Email: steve.benesh@bracewell.com

and

Ann D. Navaro (admitted pro hac vice)

Brittany Pemberton (admitted pro hac vice)

2001 M Street NW, Suite 900

Washington, DC 20006

Telephone: (202) 828-5811

Facsimile: (800) 404-3970

Email: ann.navaro@bracewell.com

Email: brittany.pemberton@bracewell.com

COUNSEL FOR INTERVENOR 

DEFENDANTS

KINDER MORGAN TEXAS PIPELINE LLC 

AND

PERMIAN HIGHWAY PIPELINE, LLC

Case 1:20-cv-00460-RP Document 50 Filed 02/11/21 Page 3 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on this 11

th day of February, 2021, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing document was filed and served using the electronic case filing system (“ECF”) pursuant to 

the electronic filing requirements of the United States District Court for the Western District of 

Texas.

/s/ Joshua D. Smith 

Joshua D. Smith

Case 1:20-cv-00460-RP Document 50 Filed 02/11/21 Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 194 (Thursday, October 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25617]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL00-114-000]


Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc., Complainant v. Ameren Services 
Company, Respondent; Notice of Complaint

September 29, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 28, 2000, Dynegy Power Marketing, 
Inc. (Dynegy) tendered for filing a Complaint against Ameren Services 
Company, (Ameren).
    In its Complaint, Dynegy alleges that Ameren has violated its Open 
Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) by refusing to recognize rollover 
rights for existing Point-to-Point Transmission Services.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before October 10, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the 
complaint shall also be due on or before October 10, 2000.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-25617 Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2008 - 0415 Directorate Identifier: 2007NM256AD LINEAR MOTION 7901708, RB --- 7/26/05

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket **MA Y BE VIEWED AT:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008