alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT TO
                             SPLIT-DOLLAR AGREEMENT

         THIS AMENDMENT TO SPLIT-DOLLAR  AGREEMENT is executed on July 12, 2001,
effective  as of March 28,  2001,  by and among  Sharper  Image  Corporation,  a
Delaware Corporation, with principal offices in the State of California, Richard
J. Thalheimer, and Alan Thalheimer,  Trustee of the Richard and Elyse Thalheimer
Irrevocable  Trust of 1995,  who are hereafter  collectively  referred to as the
"Parties" and individually as a "Party".)

         WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a Split-Dollar  Agreement on July 30,
1997, effective as of May 22, 1997 with respect to certain Policies insuring the
life of Richard J. Thalheimer; and

         WHEREAS,  the  Policies  that  were  the  subject  of the  Split-Dollar
Agreement  have been replaced by Prudential  Life  Insurance  Company of America
Variable Universal Life Insurance Policy Number V9601360 (the "New Policy"); and

         WHEREAS, the Parties intend that the New Policy shall be subject to the
Split-Dollar Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

         1. All references in the Split-Dollar  Agreement to the "Policies" or a
"Policy" shall be deemed to refer to the New Policy.

         2. All references in the Split-Dollar  Agreement to the "Policies" or a
"Policy"  shall be deemed  to refer to  Prudential  Life  Insurance  Company  of
America.

         3. Exhibit A shall be modified to read as hereafter provided.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the Parties have executed multiple original copies
of this amendment on the date written in the introductory paragraph.


                                           Sharper Image Corporation


                                           By: /s/
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Secretary


                                      -1-

<PAGE>

                                               /s/ Richard J. Thalheimer
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Richard J. Thaleimer



                                               /s/ Alan Thalheimer
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Alan Thalheimer,  Trustee  of the
                                               Richard   and  Elyse   Thalheimer
                                               Irrevocable Trust of 1995


                                      -2-

<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT A

The  following  life  insurance  policy  is subject to the attached Split-Dollar
Agreement

Insurer:        Prudential Life Insurance Company of America

Insured:        Richard J. Thalheimer

Policy Number:  V9601360

Face Amount:    $15,737,572

Date of Issue:  March 28, 2001


                                      -3-
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES -0XLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Cal Alta
Auto Glass, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2008,as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Kirk Reed, President of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the
Company.

April 14, 2009                               /s/ Kirk Reed
                                         		  ---------
----------------------------

Kirk Reed

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

SCOTT MICHAEL KENNETH MCCLAIN 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM RETIRED STATUS 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 96 DB 2015 (No. 47 RST 2015) 

Attorney Registration No. 63981 

(Out of State) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 4th day of August, 2015, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated July 27, 2015, is approved and it is ORDERED that 

Scott Michael Kenneth McClain, who has been on Retired Status, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the 

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5313 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain parts suitable for use solely 

or principally with the apparatus of heading 8535, 8536 or 8537. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. SESSIONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain parts suitable 

for use solely or principally with the apparatus of heading 8535, 8536 or 8537. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PARTS SUITABLE FOR USE SOLELY 

4 OR PRINCIPALLY WITH THE APPARATUS OF 

5 HEADING 8535, 8536 OR 8537. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5313 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Parts suitable for use solely or principally with the 

apparatus of heading 

8535, 8536 or 8537, with 

metal contacts (provided 

for in subheading 

8538.90.60) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### PRATHER v. SOUTHERN EXPRESS, Inc.

No. 2872.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Sept. 29, 1949.

Owen F. Watkins, Mexia, for appellant.

Callaway & Reed, Dallas, for appellee.

LESTER, Justice.

Southern Express, Inc., instituted these proceedings to establish a foreign judgment it had obtained against the appellant C. G. Prather in the District Court of Atoka County, Oklahoma.

The appellant was operating his automobile in said county on a public highway when his car and a motor vehicle being operated on said highway by one of appel-lee’s employees collided. Appellee instituted suit in the District Court in Oklahoma to recover damages as the result of the alleged negligence of the appellant. Appellant employed counsel, and through his counsel filed an answer in said cause, in which he pleaded (1) a general demurrer; (2) special exceptions questioning the sufficiency of the allegations of negligence of appellee’s pleadings; (3) a general denial; and (4) a cross-action in which he sought to recover damages as the result of the alleged negligence of appellee’s employee; but he seems to have taken no further action in the matter in said court. Appellee, at the time suit was filed and judgment rendered, was domiciled in Dallas County, Texas, and appellant was a resident of Limestone County, Texas.

The appellant advances three propositions contending that the judgment rendered by the District Court of Oklahoma is void because: (1) it did not have active jurisdiction over the subject matter; (2) appellant being a resident of Texas at the time, the court did not acquire active jurisdiction over his person; and (3) both parties being residents of Texas, the proceedings to obtain a foreign judgment in Oklahoma were void.

We are unable to agree with either of the theories advanced. The District Court of Oklahoma is a court of general jurisdiction, and the appellant, by appearing and filing his answer and cross-action in said cause, submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the court and vested in the court ample power to render a personal judgment against him. Long Island Machinery & Equipment Co., Inc., et al. v. Baird, Tex.Civ.App., 117 S.W.2d 565; York v. State, 73 Tex. 651, 11 S.W. 869; Cassidy v. Willis & Connally, 33 Tex.Civ.App. 289, 78 S.W. 40; Svrcek v. Hahn, County Judge et al., Tex.Civ.App., 103 S.W.2d 840; Grizzard v. Brown, 2 Tex.Civ.App. 584, 22 S.W. 252; Peacock et al. v. Bradshaw et al., 145 Tex. 68, 194 S.W.2d 551, 555; Rogers v. Rodgers, 196 Okl. 478, 165 P.2d 986.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

G&G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC, 

AS BROADCAST LICENSEE OF THE 

MAY 6, 2017 ALVAREZ V. CHAVEZ, 

JR. FIGHT PROGRAM;

 Plaintiff,

vs.

NANCY C. GUERRERO,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

SA-20-CV-00525-JKP

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

Before the Court is the above-styled cause of action. The record reflects that Plaintiff 

served Defendant on May 22, 2020, making Defendant’s answer due by June 12, 2020. 

Defendant has failed to answer or otherwise respond in this action. Plaintiff has not moved for a 

Clerk’s Entry of Default or taken any other action in this case with respect to the default of 

Defendant. A district court may dismiss an action for failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed 

for failure to prosecute. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause why this case should not be 

dismissed for a failure to prosecute on or before August 24, 2020. 

SIGNED this 13th day of August, 2020.

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00525-JKP-ESC Document 7 Filed 08/13/20 Page 1 of 1
----

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 March 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France)) — Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie v Gillan Beach Ltd

(Case C-114/05) (1)

(VAT - Place of taxable transactions - Fiscal connection - Services provided in connection with boat shows)

(2006/C 131/45)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d'État (France)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie

Defendant: Gillan Beach Ltd

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Counseil d'Etat (France) — Interpretation of Article 9(2) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388 of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Determination of relevant place for tax purposes — Supply of services carried out in relation to boat shows.

Operative part of the judgment

The first indent of Article 9(2)(c) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted as meaning that an inclusive service provided by an organiser to exhibitors at a fair or in an exhibition hall falls within the category of services referred to in that provision.

----

(1)OJ C 115,14.05.2005.

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct Of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. § 1350)**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of SouthWest Water Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”), I,David Stanton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that:

 

1)     to myknowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)     theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: August 25,  2009 | /s/ DAVID STANTON       |   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                         | David Stanton           |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer |
#### RILEY v. STATE.

No. 26808.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 10, 1954.

Ayres K. Ross, Austin, for appellant

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. ■

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the possession of whiskey in a dry area for the purpose of sale, with a prior conviction alleged to enhance the punishment; the punishment, 18 months in jail and a fine of $1,500.

The statement of facts appearing in the record was not filed with the clerk of the trial court as required by Article 759a, § 4, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. Therefore, ■the statement of facts and the informal bills of exception indexed therein cannot be considered.

The complaint and . information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular; therefore, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment, of the trial court is affirmed. :.:
#### McDOWELL v. STATE.

No. 25055.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 20, 1950.

On Rehearing March 14, 1951.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP,. Judge.

• Appellant was convicted of a violation of the liquor laws in McCulloch County, and under an allegation of a prior conviction of like character, he was given a penalty of $500.

We find only one bill of exception in the record, and it relates to the overruling of a motion to quash the indictment on the general ground that same does not charge an offense under the law. To this we do not agree.

We find a statement of facts herein, and the facts support a judgment, as well as a former conviction of like character.

The judgment will therefore be affirmed!

On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The record in the present instance contains the same defect and is subject to the same criticism as that discussed in the opinion on motion for rehearing this day delivered in Bumguardner v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 237 S.W.2d 308.

For the reasons stated in said opinion, the-motion for a rehearing'herein is granted,, the order of affirmance heretofore entered is set aside, and this cause is noVv reversed and remanded.
#### CAMPBELL v. STATE.

No. 23586.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 12, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, «for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a jFifty Dollar fine.

The proceedings are regular and the record is brought forward without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
BRANSON JEWELRY (USA), INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATIONS
-----------------------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Kevan Attwood, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that this report on Form 10-KSB of Branson Jewelry
(USA),  Inc for the  period  ending  March  31,  2004  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in this report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents
in all material  respects the  financial  condition and results of operations of
Branson Jewelry (UAS), Inc.

July 1, 2004

/s/ Kevan Attwood
---------------------------------
Kevan Attwood, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
President & Director of Branson Jewelry (USA), Inc.




























--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form 10KSB - For the period ending March 31, 2004                      Page 27
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Lower 48 States Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Lower 48 States Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 6,592 
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 6,717  | 7,058  | 7,212  | 7,893  | 7,624  | 7,561  | 7,784  | 7,729  | 7,837  | 7,389 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 7,246  | 7,104  | 7,104  | 6,901  | 6,869  | 7,093  | 7,486  | 7,342  | 7,204  | 7,515 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 8,068  | 7,588  | 7,589  | 7,072  | 7,559  | 7,813  | 8,134  | 8,818  | 8,963  |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# DATE & TIME:

Wednesday, October 11, 2000 at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# DATE & TIME:

Thursday, October 12, 2000 at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Dole for President—Statement of Reasons (LRA#467).

Dole/Kemp '96, Inc.—Statement of Reasons (LRA#506).

Advisory Opinion 2000-25: Minnesota House of Representatives Democratic Farmer Labor Caucus by counsel, Allan W. Weinblatt.

Advisory Opinion 2000-26: Joel Deckard, Reform Party candidate, U.S. Senate, Florida.

Administrative Matters:

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-25707  Filed 10-3-00; 1:29 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5204 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5204

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain PCBTF 
                         with an acid acceptor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Mulvaney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain PCBTF 
                         with an acid acceptor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PCBTF WITH AN ACID ACCEPTOR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.36 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain PCBTF with an acid 
acceptor) is amended--
            (1) by amending the article description to read as follows: 
        ``1-Chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl) benzene (CAS No. 98-56-6) 
        containing an acid acceptor stabilizer (provided for in 
        subheading 2903.99.08 or 3824.90.92)''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```