alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12

Dated:  June 26, 2006

I, David Balai, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F,and all reports on Form 6-K containing distribution or servicingreports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annualreport, of Permanent Financing (No. 8) PLC, Permanent Funding (No. 1)Limited and Permanent Mortgages Trustee Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information inthese reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distributionor servicing information required to be provided to the trustee by the servicerunder the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in thesereports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annualcompliance statement included in the report and required to be delivered to themortgages trustee in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, orsimilar, agreement and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer hasfulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significantdeficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards based upon the report provided by an independent accountant, afterconducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Programfor Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling andservicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliatedparties: Halifax plc

Date: June 26, 2006
| By:                                                      | /s/ David Balai |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------|
| Title: Director,  Permanent Funding (No. 1) Limited |

 

----
#### DORGAN v. STATE.

No. 24819.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 21, 1950.

Arturo C. Gonzalez, of Del Rio, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was given a sentence of five years in the penitentiary for swindling with a worthless check.

The only question raised by the appeal is the insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. The one bill of exception and the brief base their contention on the claim of failure to present legal evidence showing that the check was presented for payment.

This contention is not supported by the evidence. A banker in Del Rio testified to receiving the check for deposit, transferring it to San Antonio and receiving it, in due process of business, returned to his bank unpaid with a code mark which meant “unable to locate account”. The assistant cashier of the Bexar County National Bank, on which the check was drawn, appeared as a witness with the records showing that the check was presented and payment refused because appellant had no funds in the bank at that time.

We find no reversible error and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
## "bockg.- ( iXrr-(b'^T-7jboZ-(lS^S i

"— 1 c 3 

# A jT^C ^ ATHEN S ( I CLARK

E ^ ^ ^ COUNT Y July 22 , 2 0 i

O Mr
. Deimi s J
. DeVan

y Chief , Essentia l Ai i Servic e Division , X-5 3 Offic e o f Aviation Analysi s Departmen

t o f Tianspoilation , s" ' Floor , Roo mW86-47 2 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : June 25 , 201 0 Lette r Requestin g Comment s o

n Essentia l Ai r Servic e fo

r Athen s Georgia
. Dea r MJ'
. DeVany , Than k yo u fo r you r assistanc e in requestin g proposal s fo r ai r carrier s t o provide EA S supported au - servic e t o the Athens-Be

n Epp s Airport
. Continuin g it s connectio n wit h the Nationa

l Ai r Transportatio n Syste

mi s ver y importan t t o thi s community
. Ou

r citizen s have no

t onl y expresse d thei

r interes t i n continuin g th e service , bu t als o impro\'iii g th

e level s o f sei'vic e provided
. A t th e reques t

o f the Essentia

l Ai r Service , fou

r airline s submitte d proposal s to provid e EAS subsidized ai

r servic e t o Athens ; Pacifi c Wings , LL C d/b/a / Georgi aSkie s (Georgi aSkies) , Alask aJunea u Aeronautics , Inc
. d/b/a / Seapor t Airline s (Seaport) , Charte r Ai r Transport , Inc. , an

d Sovereig n Air , Inc
. The Athen s Airpor

t Authorit y establishe d ase

t o f goal s fo r evaluatin g the proposal s whic h shoul d resul

t i n th e growl h an d improvemen

t o f the ai r servic e provided u

i Athens
. Thes e goal s include recruitmen t an d retention o f a n ai r carrie r tha t wil l provide sei-vice to amajo r hub airpor

t meetin g the following criteria ; aprove n custome r sei-vice/marketin

g program , affordable pricing , interlinin g o r cod e shar

e agreement s wit

h majo r carriers , interne

t ticketm g availabilit>' , baggag e transfers , an d abusines s mode

l designe d t

o minimize an

d eventuall y eliminat e th e nee d fo r operationa

l subsidies
. Afte r carefu l consideratio n which include d meetin g the abov e state d goals , contrac t bi d price , comment

s fro m are acitizen s an

d busines s representatives , amajorit y vot e o f th e Airpor

t Authorit) ' Board , i

t i s recommende

d tha t Alask aJunea u Aerouautics , Inc
. d/b/a / Seapor t Airline s (Seaport ) b e awarde d th e contrac t t o provid e servic e bebvee

n Athen s Be

n Epp s Airpor

t an d Atlant aHartsfield Jackso n Uiternationa l Aiiport
. Not

e tha t Seapor t Airline s ha s agreed to amend their proposed destinatio n o f Nashvill e Internationa

l t o Atlant a International
. Again , than

k yo u fo r you r assistanc e wit

h ou r ai r servic e an

d shoul d yo

u hav e an y question s pleas e fee

l fre e t o contac t m e o r th e Airpor t Manager
. 

# SMm d Heid i Davison , Mayo r
c : Athen s Airpor

t Authorit y Seapor t Airline s Charte r Ai r Transport , Inc
. Sovereign Air , Inc
. Pacifi c Wings , LL

C
_ , , , _ ^ MAYO R HEID I DAVISO N UNIFIE D GOVERNMEN T O F ATHENS-CLARK E COUNTY , GEORGI A 

### 30 1 Colleg e Avenu e • Athens , Georgi a3060 1 • (706 ) 613-301 0 • FA X (706 ) 613-303 3
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of North State Bancorp (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Larry D. BarbourLarry D. BarbourPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Kirk A. WhorfKirk A. WhorfChief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2011
Arkansas Environmental Support

425 West Capitol Avenue

Entery Lthle Rock AR 72203

Tel 501-377-4033

Fax 281-297-6128

G. Tracy Johnson, Manager

Arkansas Environmental Support

AR-i 3-019

February 21, 2013

Mr. Mike Bates

Chief, Air Division

Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality

5301 Northshore Drive

North Little Rock, AR 72118

RE: Entergy Arkansas, Inc. — White Bluff Plant

BART Five-Factor Analysis

Permit No. 0263-AOP-R7, AFIN 35-00110

Dear Mr. Bates:

Please find attached the Best Avalable Retrofit Technology (BART) Five-Factor Analysis (FFA)

for the Entergy Arkansas, Inc — White Bluff Plant. This analysis has been completed in

accordance with the BART Guidelines established by the US EPA in Appendix Y to 40 CFR

Part 51.

Please note that the attached hard copy does not contain the Continuous Emissions Monitoring

(CEM) data of Appendix D to the analysis. Due to significant number of pages necessary to

include this information, it will be provided electronically instead of as a hard copy. All

CALPUFF air modeling files for this analysis will similarly be provided to your staff via a

download link to be provided via email.

We appreciate ADEQ’s consideration of this analysis. Should you or your staff have any

questions regarding this submittal, please contact me at (50i) 377-4033 or David Triplett at

(501) 377-4030.

Sincerely,

/

N

G. Tracy Johnson

Manager, Arkansas Environmental Support

GTJ/dct

CC: Mary Pettyjohn. ADEQ (via email)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

USA, et al.

Vv.

wervenvev

IRS, et al.

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

No. 20-cv-000362

FILED

February 08, 2021

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT CLERK
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BY Akeita Michael

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, the Plaintiff and relator, John Adams, provides notice of
the voluntary dismissal of this action.

Respectfully Submitted,

=

foun ADAMS

Dated: February 2, 2021

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Thereby certify that | served a copy of the foregoing document on the following by first class

mail:

United States Attorney
Western District of Texas
903 San Jancinto Boulevard
Suite 334

Austin, Texas 78701

(=
rons ADAMS

Dated: February 2, 2021


3 FEB 2021 PM7 L
Dict Cou

Maken ae, ity
Weske an FAs Wek cr =( Ke
x OO < Ca acl Avei\we

Wee, TX 1610\
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

KENNETH BELL, et al., §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§

v. § 1:20-CV-461-RP

§

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC., et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the Court is the State of Texas’s Motion to Intervene. (Dkt. 126). The State seeks to 

intervene by right under Rules 5.1 and 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Mot. 

Intervene, Dkt. 126, at 2–4). The State argues that under Rule 24(a)(1), it has the right to intervene 

because 28 U.S.C. § 2403(b) gives a state a right to intervene when the constitutionality of a state 

statute is challenged. (Id. at 2–3). That State further argues it has the right to intervene under Rule 

24(a)(2) “since Texas has a unique interest in defending the constitutionality of its statutes [as 

recognized by] Section 2403(b) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.” (Id. at 3–4) (citing Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 5.1(c)). Additionally, the State provided the arguments that they intend to present in defense 

of the statute being challenged in this case. (Id. at 4). 

Intervention by right is governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a). To intervene by 

right, the prospective intervenor either must be “given an unconditional right to intervene by a 

federal statute,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(1), or must meet each of the four requirements of Rule 

24(a)(2):

(1) the application for intervention must be timely; (2) the applicant must have an interest 

relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action; (3) the applicant 

must be so situated that the disposition of the action may, as a practical matter, impair or 

impede his ability to protect that interest; (4) the applicant’s interest must be inadequately 

represented by the existing parties to the suit.

Case 1:20-cv-00461-RP Document 140 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Texas v. United States, 805 F.3d 653, 657 (5th Cir. 2015). “Although the movant bears the burden of 

establishing its right to intervene, Rule 24 is to be liberally construed.” Id. (citations omitted).

“Federal courts should allow intervention where no one would be hurt and the greater justice could 

be attained.” Sierra Club v. Espy, 18 F.3d 1202, 1205 (5th Cir.1994) (internal quotation marks 

omitted).

The Court finds that the State meets the requirements of Rule 24 to intervene in this case by 

right. The Court also notes that Plaintiffs consented to the State’s intervention, and no party, 

including Defendants, filed a response or opposition to the State’s motion. The motion is therefore 

unopposed. For those reasons, the Court will permit the State to intervene.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the State of Texas’s Motion to Intervene, (Dkt. 

126), is GRANTED. 

SIGNED on December 2, 2020.

_____________________________________

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00461-RP Document 140 Filed 12/02/20 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|Montana Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Montana Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Barney A. Richmond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge, the
Annual Report of A Super Deal.com, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2009, (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) that the information contained in such Form
10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
A Super Deal.com, Inc.



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date:
September 9, 2010 |  | /S/    BARNEY
A.
RICHMOND    
|                        |  | Barney A. Richmond           
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Richard C. Turner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge, the
Annual Report of A Super Deal.com, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended
May 31, 2009, (i) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) that the information contained in such Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
A Super Deal.com, Inc.



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date:
September 9, 2010 |  | /S/    RICHARD
C.
TURNER     
|                        |  | Richard C. Turner            
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                        |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit F

Case 1:20-cv-00560-RP Document 113-6 Filed 09/29/21 Page 1 of 2
El Campo Ventures, LLC

El Campo Ventures, LLC - 213B West 8th Street - Georgetown, Texas 78626

August 12, 2019

Via Email: MJones@HenryandJones.com

Michael L. Jones

Henry & Jones, LLP

16901 Dallas Parkway, Suite 202

Addison, Texas 75001

RE: Stratton Securities / El Campo Ventures Agreement

Dear Mike,

It is our belief that the Agreement between Stratton and El Campo and the resulting Lease 

w/ Option to Purchase Contract entered into with the Federal Government by Stratton made El 

Campo a full partner in the property once Stratton received the initial agreed upon $4 Million

referenced in the Stratton/El Campo Agreement. As such, we believe we are fully entitled to 50% 

of any and all profits of the venture under any sale or lease of the property as well as fully entitled 

to all the rights and privileges of such 50% ownership in the property.

We understand that Dan and Shannon Stratton disagree with our contention and they desire 

to settle this matter in an amicable manner which would allow them to resolve any and all 

ownership issues regarding the property and to retain full ownership thereof. Per our previous 

conversations regarding this matter please see below our proposed settlement options regarding 

the Agreement between Stratton Securities, Inc. and El Campo Ventures, LLC:

Option 1 - Walk Away Number: $3 Million paid today (Full Settlement w/ no future 

participation) – Total Value of $3 Million to El Campo.

Option 2 – Discounted Lease Value + Reduced Contingent Purchase Option Payment: $2.25

Million paid today w/ additional $1.75 Million contingent upon exercising of purchase option –

Total Potential Value of $4 Million to El Campo.

Option 3 - Full Federal Contract Participation: 50% of Net Proceeds for 3 year contract 

discounted to today (estimated approx. $500K after deduction of $4 Million paid to Stratton and 

verified operations expenditures) + 50% of Yr4 proceeds if and when exercised (estimated $1.1 

Million) + 50% of Yr5 proceeds if and when exercised (estimated $1.1 Million) + 50% of Sale 

Proceeds if and when option is exercised (estimated $5 Million after deduction of verified capital 

expenditures) – Total estimated Potential Value of $7.7 Million to El Campo.

Respectfully,

Dan Gattis

Case 1:20-cv-00560-RP Document 113-6 Filed 09/29/21 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Louisiana State Offshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Louisiana State Offshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 5      |        |        |        |        | -41    | 290    | -12    | 57    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | -137   | 103    | -121   | 229    | 38     | -24    | -1     | 40     | -85    | 183   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 67     | 6      | -19    | 32     | -59    | 29     | -22    | 12     | 4      | -7    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -228   | 0      | 213    | -83    | -51    | -23    | 179    | -30    | 46     | 138   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 141    | 122    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023