alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Airspace Docket No. 00-ACE-13]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of a direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Fairfield, IA.

# DATES:

The direct final rule published at 65 FR 40991 is effective on 0901 UTC, November 30, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2525.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 3, 2000 (65 FR 40991). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on November 30, 2000. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO on September 6, 2000.

Richard L. Day,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.

[FR Doc. 00-25642  Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25826]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel Meeting for Ecological Studies; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name and Committee Code: Advisory Panel for Ecological Studies 
(#1751).
    Date and Time: October 11, 2000, 8 a.m.-5 p.m. thru October 13, 
2000, 8 a.m.-Adjourn.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
375, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Scott L. Collins, Program Officer or Mr. 
Aaron Kinchen, Program & Technology Analyst, Ecological Studies 
Cluster, Room 640N, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8481.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals to the National Science Foundation (NSF) for 
financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted in response 
to the Ecological Studies Ecology Program Solicitation (99-2).
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 3, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25826 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.6


            AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS OF FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC.


     Bylaw 3.2 of the Bylaws of First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. is amended
in its entirety as follows:

               3.2 NUMBER, TENURE AND QUALIFICATIONS OF DIRECTORS

(a)  The number of directors of the corporation shall be at least five and not
     more than eighteen. The initial number of directors shall be nine. The
     shareholders or the board of directors may increase or decrease the number
     of directors within that range; provided, however, that no decrease shall
     have the effect of shortening the term of any incumbent director. After
     expiration of a director's term, the director shall continue to serve until
     a successor has been elected and qualified or until there is a decrease in
     the number of directors. Directors need not be residents of Montana or
     shareholders of the corporation. At all times that the terms of bylaw
     3.2(b) are not in effect, each director shall hold office until the next
     annual meeting of shareholders or until a director dies, resigns, or is
     removed.

(b)  At any time that there are nine or more directors, the shareholders or the
     board or directors may stagger the terms of the directors by dividing the
     total number of directors into two or three groups, with each group
     containing as near as possible to one-half or one-third of the total. If
     the terms of directors are staggered, the terms of directors in the first
     group expire at the first annual shareholders' meeting after their
     election, the terms of the second group expire at the second annual
     shareholders' meeting after their election, and the terms of the third
     group, if any, expire at the third annual shareholders' meeting after their
     election. At any shareholders' meeting held thereafter, directors shall be
     chosen for a term of two or three years, as the case may be, to succeed
     those whose terms expire. If the number of directors is reduced below nine,
     the staggered terms must be removed and the terms of directors shall be
     returned to those described under bylaw 3.2(a).







                 CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS

     The undersigned, secretary of the above Montana corporation, does
hereby certify that the foregoing amendment to bylaws was adopted and as of this
date the same is now incorporated into the bylaws of the corporation.

         DATED:  May 18, 2001.


                                       /s/ CAROL STEPHENS DONALDSON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Carol Stephens Donaldson, Secretary
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Radium Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ernest Peter, the Treasurer and Director (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 28, 2004

Ernest Peters

_/s/ Ernest Peters______________________
Treasurer and Director 
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
#### In the Matter of David B., a Person Alleged to be in Need of Supervision.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings. Same memorandum as in *Matter of David B.*([appeal No. 1] 167 AD2d 885 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family *887Court, Killeen, J.—PINS.) Present—Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
#### LOPEZ v. STATE.

No. 26269.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 18, 1953.

*200No attorney on appeal..

George P. Blackburn', State’s Atty-., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for .the1 offense of driving - an automobile upon-' a- public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at a-fine of $100.

' The record contains no notice of appeal, in the absence of which we' are' without jurisdiction' ■ to enter any ' order except a dismissal of the appeal.

The appéal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                 CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paragon Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard
S. Yurkovic, President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                             /s/ Leonard S. Yurkovic
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Leonard S. Yurkovic
                             President and Chief Executive Officer
                              May 13, 2005
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 511 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the importation of various 

injurious species of constrictor snakes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2011 

Mr. ROONEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the 

importation of various injurious species of constrictor snakes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPORTATION OR SHIPMENT OF INJURIOUS 

4 SPECIES. 

5 Section 42(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended in the first sentence by inserting after 

7 ‘‘polymorpha;’’ the following: ‘‘of the Indian python of the 

8 species Python molurus, including the Burmese python of 

9 the species Python molurus bivittatus; of the reticulated 

10 python of the species Broghammerus reticulatus or 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 511 IH

1 Python reticulatus; of the Northern African python of the 

2 species Python sebae; of the Southern African python of 

3 the species Python natalensis; of the boa constrictor of the 

4 species Boa constrictor; of the yellow anaconda of the spe5 cies Eunectes notaeus; of the DeSchauensee’s anaconda 

6 of the species Eunectes deschauenseei; of the green ana7 conda of the species Eunectes murinus; of the Beni ana8 conda of the species Eunectes beniensis;’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### BYARS v. STATE.

No. 24484.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 12, 1949.

Carter & Stiernberg and Travis Smith, Harlingen, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction was for murder, punishment assessed at five years in the penitentiary. Appeal was perfected to this court.

It is made to appear by proper proof that pending such appeal, on, to-wit: the 1st day of September, 1949, appellant died. The State therefore moves for abatement of the appeal. It is therefore ordered that said appeal be and the same is hereby abated.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**Capital One Auto Finance Trust2005-A**

 

Aggregate Data for year ended December 31, 2005

 
| Defaults                                     |   | $ | 47,200,475.17  |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|---|----------------|--------|
| Total  Collections                           |   | $ | 558,076,014.50 |   |
| Scheduled  and Prepayment Principal Received |   | $ | 375,442,339.11 |   |
| Collection  of Interest and Fees             |   | $ | 163,094,738.07 |   |
| Annual  Servicing Fee                        |   | $ | 27,804,658.59  |   |
| Class A  Investor Charge-Offs           |   | $ | 0.00           |   |

 

----
Gina McCarthy 

Commissioner 

The Honorable Robert W. Varney 

Regional Administrator 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 1, EPA New England 

One Congress Street, Suite 1100 

Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2023 

Re: 8-Hour Ozone Attainment Measures 

Dear Mr. Varney: 

December 8, 2006 

In accordance with the provisions of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Section 51 Appendix 

V, the enclosed revision to Connecticut's State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality is being 

submitted for your approval. The revision, 8-Hour Ozone Reasonably Available Control Technology 

State Implementation Plan Analysis for the State of Connecticut, includes a detailed description and 

analysis of Connecticut's reasonably available control technology (RACT) controls. Also included, 

in accordance with Appendix V, are copies of the hearing notice and hearing certification. All 

documents are submitted in quintuple as required . 

As you are aware, Connecticut has moved well beyond merely implementing RACT, and we 

have included in this SIP revision a discussion of additional 8-hour ozone attainment measures 

currently in development that pertain to the RACT category sources but go beyond the RACT 

requirements . We will be submitting these rules in support of the state's 8-hour ozone attainment 

demonstration. You may access our progress with respect to these, and other attainment measures, at 

our web site at the following location: http://www.dep.state .ct.us/air2/regs/index .htm. 

If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Gary Rose, the Air 

Bureau's Director of Engineering and Technical Services, at 860-424-4152 . 

Enclosures 

cc: David Conroy, EPA Region 1 

Kiernan J . Wholean, CT DEP 

STATE OF CONNECTICUT 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

79 ELM STREET HARTFORD, CT 06106-5127 

PHONE: 860-424-3001 

(Printed on Recycled Paper) 

http ://dep .statcct .us 

An Equal OpporlunitY Emplover
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Windrose Medical
Properties Trust (the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred S. Klipsch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Fred S. Klipsch
--------------------
Fred S. Klipsch
Chief Executive Officer
March 12, 2004
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, William Fox, certifythat:

 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K,and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reportsfiled in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report,of Lehman ABS Corporation, on behalf of Corporate Backed Trust Certificates,AIG Debenture-Backed Series 2002-10 Trust****(the“Trust”);

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, the information inthese reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the distributionor servicing information required to be provided to the Depositor by theTrustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusionin these reports is included in these reports; and

 

4.              I am responsible for reviewing theactivities performed by the Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling andservicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annualcompliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the Depositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its obligations underthat agreement.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonablyrelied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S.Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee.

 

Date:  July 20,2009

 
| By:    | /s/ William Fox |                                     |
|--------|-----------------|------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:           | William Fox                              |   |
|   | Title:          | Chief Financial  Officer, Controller and |   |
|   |            | Senior Vice President                    |   |

 

----
#### HINES v. STATE.

No. 25835.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 23, 1952.

Crunk & Morgan, W. H. Crunk, Green-ville, for appellant.

George P. ■ Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Lester Plines was assessed a fine of $25 in the county court upon a complaint alleging that he drove a motor vehicle upon the highways of the state after having “heretofore had his operator’s license suspended on the 3rd day of May, 1951, for a period of six months.”

 The first contention is that this is an invalid complaint in that it does not allege that he was a licensee. Reliance is had on Holloway v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 237 S.W.2d 303. In that case the complaint charged that he had a “Driver’s License revoked.” We held that there is no such license provided for in the statute and, therefore, there was no allegation that he was a licensee. In the case now before us it is charged that he had his “operator’s license” suspended. We think this allegation is sufficient. If he had a license suspended it follows that he had such a license.

The proof in the case shows some kind of proceeding was had before a justice of peace on the 3rd day of May, 1951, by which it was determined that a person named Lester Hines was an habitual traffic violator. The evidence does not show that it was the same person as appellant. The Lester Hines proceeded against in the justice court did not appear in person. It is further shown by a member of *157the State Highway Patrol that he “* * had learned from a letter or written list sent out by the Department of Public Safety, that Lester Hines’ name was listed among others whose driver’s licenses were suspended.” No other evidence was presented to support the charge.

A strenuous, objection was made to the foregoing evidence and we think the court erred in admitting it, for which the judgment of the trial court must be reversed.

We do not wish to be understood as holding that the proceeding before the justice of the peace and the order he made thereon were within his constitutional power. That question is not before us.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is r.emanded.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

PEARL IP LICENSING LLC §

§ 

Plaintiff, § Case No: 6:20-cv-00348-ADA

§

vs. § PATENT CASE

§

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A §

VERIZON, §

§

Defendant. §

_____________________________________ §

JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE ALL DEADLINES

Now comes Plaintiff, Pearl IP Licensing, LLC, and Defendant Cellco Partnership d/b/a 

Verizon by and through undersigned counsel, and hereby requests the Court continue all deadlines 

in this case for an additional twenty-one (21) days to November 5, 2020, or such other later date 

as is convenient for the Court. For cause, the parties are in discussions to resolve the case, and 

seek an extension of any activities in the case pending those discussions to avoid any unnecessary 

expenditures of the parties’ resources.

The parties stipulate, subject to the Court’s agreement, that all normally-scheduled dates 

will be extended for the 21-day period to avoid prejudicing any party’s rights.

This Motion is not made for purpose of delay.

Dated: October 15, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/George Pazuniak

George Pazuniak (PHV)

O’Kelly & Ernst LLC

824 N. Market Street, Suite 1001A

Wilmington, DE 19803

302-478-4230

gp@del-iplaw.com

Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 15 Filed 10/15/20 Page 1 of 2
Jay Johnson

1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 13000

Dallas, Texas 75201

Phone: (214) 451 -0164

Facsimile: (214) 451-0165

jay@kjpllc.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

/s/_ Geoffrey M. Godfrey

Geoffrey M. Godfrey

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Columbia Center 

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6100

Seattle, Washington 98104-7043

godfrey.geoff@dorsey.com

Attorney For Defendant 

Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 15 Filed 10/15/20 Page 2 of 2