alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RE: EGU MACT -- Table of Costs and Benefits 

 Higgins, Cortney 

 to: 

 Ron Evans 

 12/16/2011 06:49 PM 

 Cc: 

 Bill Maxwell, RobertJ Wayland, Amy Cole 

 Hide Details 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 

To: Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Amy 

Cole/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

That looks right. This is what's currently in the system: 

 

Working Version of Costs and Benefits Statement 

 Units 

Category Primary Estimate Low Estimate High Estimate Year 

Dollars Disc Period Covered Notes 

Benefits 

 $33.00 $82.00 2007 7% 2016 

Annualized Monetized 

$millions/year $37.00 $91.00 2007 3% 2016 . 

 7% 

Annualized Quantified 3% . 

Qualitative . 

Costs 

 $9.20 2007 7% 2015 

Annualized Monetized 

$millions/year $9.20 2007 3% 2015 . 

 7% 

Annualized Quantified 3% . 

Qualitative . 

Transfers Not Estimated 

 7% 

Federal Annualized Monetized 

$millions/year 3% . 

From/To From: To: 

 7% 

Other Annualized Monetized 

$millions/year 3% . 

From/To From: To: 

Effects 

State, Local, and/or Tribal Government 

 

Not Applicable 

 
Small Business 

 EPA cannot certify that this proposal will have no SISNOSE 

(significant 

economic impacts on a substantial number of small entities). Of the 83 

affected small entities, 59 are projected to have costs greater than 1 

percent of revenues, and 45 are projected to have costs greater than 3 

percent of revenues. 

 

Wages 

 No estimates available regarding changes in wages. 

 

 

Growth 

 No estimate avaliable regarding changes in growth. 

 

 

 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Ron Evans [mailto:Evans.Ron@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 6:46 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Cc: Bill Maxwell; RobertJ Wayland; Coleman, Thomas (Volunteer) 

Subject: Re: EGU MACT -- Table of Costs and Benefits 

 

Cortney, this version was updated on the 8th. I will review it 

concurrently with you but I was told it was up to date. 

 

(See attached file: ROCIS_MATS_1216.xlsx) 

 

 

 

 

 From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 To: RobertJ 

Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

 

 

 Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

"Coleman, Thomas (Volunteer)" <Thomas_M_Coleman@ceq.eop.gov> 

 

 Date: 12/16/2011 06:38 

PM 

 

 

 

 Subject: EGU MACT -- Table of Costs and 

Benefits 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I want to remind you to also provide the updated costs and benefits 

table/spreadsheet of data that needs to be uploaded into ROCIS to Amy 

Cole, the person who will upload the documents. Both costs and benefits 

have changed since the rule was submitted for review.
**                                                             **BANGLA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.**                                                             **

**Exhibit 32.1 - Certifications**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE *SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

```

```

I, Shawn Erickson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that this report on Form 10-KSB of Bangla Property Management,  Inc. for the  period ending March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in this report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the  financial  condition  and results of operations of  Bangla Property Management,  Inc. 			June 30, 2005/s/ Shawn Erickson  Shawn Erickson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer			President & Director of Bangla Property Management, Inc.

----

10KSB – Period Ending March 31, 2005                         Bangla Property Management, Inc.                      Page 33

----
1 

### Mears, Gilbert

From: ME N JOE <he_n_eye@yahoo.com>

Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 8:51 AM

To: Lueckenhoff, Dominique; Schulingkamp, Cristi na; Group R3Public; EPA; EPA; EPA; EPA; EPA; EPA; eyesondrilling; Hydraulic Fracturing; EPA.; Dewey, Amy; Briskin, Jeanne; EPA EPA; Foster, Rebecca; dbubbenmoy@state.pa. us; R3 RA; EPA.Abraham Ferdas; Arnold, David; Pomponio, John; Capacasa, Jon; Libertz, Catherine; Mulkey, Marcia; Schulingkamp, Cristina; Garing, Ken; Ripp, Thomas; eyesondrilling; Hoover, Michelle; Wisniewski, Patti-Kay; Rizzo, George; Bennett , Andrea; Meadows, Anthony; saxe, jennie; Pine, Jacqueline; Khaled, Ghassan; Bennett, Andrea; EPA.kanetsky.charles@epa.gov; Tymchenko, Nick; Schmitt, Ellen; Johnson, WandaF; Dean, Jill; epa.Gustafson Staci; DEP.LORI.MCNABB; DEP.Sunday Kevin; DEP.Chambers Laura M.; Wisniewski, Patti-Kay; Mears, Gilbert; lgmarcucci@environmentalintegrity.org Subject: Tell the US EPA to Close the TRI (Toxic Release Inventory) Loophole for the Oil and Gas Industry; Email Your Message Today

Attachments: TRI_Fact_Sheet.pdf

Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged



# please pass this on to everyone. here are the addresses for some of the EPA AND DEP . TO SEND YOUR MESSAGE JUST HIT REPLY TO ALL AND SEND YOUR MESSAGE ON.... THANK YOU

TRI (Toxic Release Inventory) Action Alert:

We need your help!! Please send an email to the US EPA urging them to "Close the TRI Loophole that the oil and gas industry currently enjoys".

We all deserve to know exactly what these operations are rele asing into our air, water and onto our land. Our goal is to guarantee the publics right to know. Please let the US EPA know how important TRI reporting will be to you and your community:

Mr. Gilbert Mears Docket #: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281 (must be included on all correspondence) Mears.gilbert@epa.gov

Toxics Release Inventory Program Division Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

Please take a moment to review the attached brief fact sheet to learn more and to see how you can help.

And, please share this message far and wide. It is important for the US EPA to hear from folks throughout the United States.

Thanks, in advance, for supporting this important call for accountability.2 Lisa Graves Marcucci Environmental Integrity Project PA Coordinator, Community Outreach lgmarcucci@environmentalintegrity.org 412-653-4328 (Direct) 412-897-0569 (Cell)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC

vs.

VMWARE INC.

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

AU:20-CV-00457-ADA

ORDER RESETTING TIME OF MARKMAN HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is reset for

MARKMAN HEARING by Zoom on Friday, December 18, 2020 at 10:00 AM.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of December, 2020.

______________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00457-ADA Document 48 Filed 12/11/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.2



| |  | Certification Pursuant to                    |  | 
| |  | -------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,                      |  | 
| |  | As Adopted Pursuant to                       |  | 
| |  | Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxey Act of 2002 |  | 



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rotech Healthcare Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Janet L.
Ziomek, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the year ended, December 31, 2002.





/s/    JANET L. ZIOMEK

---

Janet L. Ziomek

Chief Financial Officer



Date:  March 31, 2003
14910-13-PJ 

### DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTAnON Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 

## 0'1'2.. [Docket No. FAA-2009-1 IIII; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-J52-AO;



## \{,,205 Amendment 39-**; AD 

## HJ 2.0 

## lO-oL{ -\

# 'L RIN 2120-AA64 CUl'CU""'NClo.' 1IQ'""'G~YM"()1. ANE-171 ,,.,.,.,MSI>l<l C ale:

"Olm"Q~"MIJ"'. ANI',-171 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-1 00 and DHC~8~200 Series Airplanes, and 

### Model DHC~8~301, -311, and -315 Airplanes AGENCY: FederalAviation Administration (FAA), DOT. 

### ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-100 and DHC-8-200 series airplanes, and DHC-8- 30I, -311, and -315 airplanes. This AD requires implementing a corrosion prevention and control 

### program (CPCP) 

### either by 

### accomplishing specific tasks orby 

### revising themaintenance inspection program to include a CPCP. This AD results from the determination that, as airplanes age, they are more likely to exhibit indications ofcorrosion. We are issuing this AD to prevent structural failure ofthe airplane due to corrosion. DATES: This AD is effective [inselt date 35 days after date of publication in the 

### FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., "A'" 

## ''''/.-1.(,4 

# M;;'"~\\ i' '""''''''~r--

"OUr",; ,y""oI. 

# A,J;'o

- 10 I 

# '"~I

UAI" 400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; /.. I' 0 fax 514-855-740 I; e-mail thd.gseries@aero.hombardieLcom; Internet http://www.bombardier.com. 

### Examining the ADDocket You may examine the AD docket on lhe Internet at http://www.regulations.gov;
or inperson atthe Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

### .ANtl-OO 

# '1?>":hvu••.• ; "A~" '- /I 10
Exhibit 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned officers of Standard  Microsystems  Corporation (the Company),  does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended May 31,  2004 of the
Company fully  complies,  in all material  respects,  with the  requirements  of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and  information
contained  in the Form 10-Q  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: July 2, 2004                      By: /s/ Steven J. Bilodeau
                                         ----------------------------
                                                 (signature)

                                         Steven J. Bilodeau
                                         Chairman of the Board, President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer


                                         By: /s/ Andrew M. Caggia
                                         ----------------------------
                                                 (signature)

                                         Andrew M. Caggia
                                         Senior Vice President - Finance
                                         and Chief Financial Officer
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. HECTOR CRUZ, Defendant - Appellant. No. 09-10328 D.C. No. 1:07-cr-00268-JMS-3
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii J. Michael Seabright, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 18, 2010 Honolulu, Hawaii Before: B. FLETCHER, PREGERSON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges. Appellant Hector Cruz pled guilty to distributing 50 grams or more of methamphetamine and agreed to a waiver of the right to appeal. In exchange, the government dropped all other charges agai nst him. His attorney has filed an 

# FILED
JUL 02 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS1 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 2 Anders 1 brief in this appeal and has moved to withdraw as counsel. Cruz has filed
no pro se supplemental brief in response to the court’s invitation to do so. Having examined the record, we concl ude that Cruz entered into the plea agreement and agreed to the waiver of appellate rights knowingly and voluntarily, and that the district court complied with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. See United States v. Nguyen , 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000)
. The waiver of appellate rights to whic h Cruz agreed waives any challenge to his sentence, unless the sentence exceed ed the applicable guideline range as determined by the district court, which it did not. Thus, the waiver applies to any possible challenge to Cruz’s sentence, w ith two recognized exceptions: a claim that the sentence did not comport with the term s of the plea agreement, and a claim that the sentence violated the law. See United States v. Bibler , 495 F.3d 621, 624 (9th Cir. 2007). Here, however, the sentence comported with the terms of the plea agreement and is not unlawful. Accordi ngly we dismiss the appeal. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. DISMISSED; COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED.
EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements (No. 333-97419, No. 333-107337, No. 333-110775, No. 333-110777, No. 333-123617, No. 333-123620, No. 333-137766, No. 333-137767, No. 333-144707, No. 333-144708, and
No. 333-144710) on Forms S-8 of North State Bancorp of our report dated March 30, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of North State Bancorp and subsidiary as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 which report appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of
North State Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2010.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC     
|Greenville, North Carolina
|March 31, 2011
Exhibit
      12.1





**RATIO
      OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS AND RATIO OF
      EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**





The
      following table sets forth our ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
      and
      preferred dividends and our ratio of earnings to fixed charges for each of
      the
      periods indicated:




Year
                  Ended December 31,2006
              
              2005
              
              2004
              
              2003
              
              2002
                  (A)Ratio
                  of Earnings to
                Combined
                  Fixed Charges and
                Preferred
                  Stock Dividends
              
              1.31
              
              1.46
              
              1.62
              
              1.62
              
              1.67Ratio
                  of Earnings toFixed
                  Charges
              
              1.34
              
              1.51
              
              1.69
              
              1.72
              
              1.72


(A)
              Represents
                  the operations of our predecessor through the date of commencement
                  of our
                  operations, July 12, 2002.




For
      purposes of calculating the above ratios, (i) earnings represent “Income before
      equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries” from our consolidated
      statements of income, as adjusted for fixed charges and distributions from
      unconsolidated subsidiaries, and (ii) fixed charges represent “Interest expense”
from our consolidated statements of income. The ratios are based solely on
      historical financial information.





These
      ratios are affected by increasing interest rates. As a result of our match
      funded financing strategy, increasing interest rates are expected to generally
      result in an increase to interest expense without a material effect on net
      income, thereby negatively impacting these ratios.
----

Action brought on 13 March 2006 — Arnaldos Rosauro and Others v Commission

(Case F-29/06)

(2006/C 121/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Andres Arnaldos Rosauro and Others (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Jaume, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants are all successful candidates of the internal competition for change of category COM/PB/04, the notice for which was published before the date when the new Staff Regulations entered into force. After that date, they were appointed by the defendant to the higher category but, because of the application of a multiplier, that did not entail an increase in their remuneration. In addition, their promotion points were re-set at zero.

In their action, the applicants submit three complaints, the first of which is that their appointment to grade B*3/B*4 is unlawful to the extent that the equivalent grades to those referred to in the competition notice are the grades B*5/B*6, in accordance with Article 2 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations.

So far as the second complaint is concerned, the applicants argue that the application of a multiplier to their remuneration is contrary to, on the one hand, the Staff Regulations, which make no mention of the application of such a factor in this instance, and, on the other hand, the principle of non-discrimination, the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations and the principle of acquired rights.

Lastly, as regards the third complaint, the applicants maintain that the cancellation of their promotion points is contrary to the spirit of Article 45a of the Staff Regulations and Article 5 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations, and the principle of equal treatment.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,504
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  106,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,163
<INVENTORY>                                    105,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               246,925
<PP&E>                                         310,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 503,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,676
<BONDS>                                        104,904
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,807
<OTHER-SE>                                     217,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   503,877
<SALES>                                        179,865
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,865
<CGS>                                          139,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,580
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,740
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,820
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,920
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,920
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .85
        

</TABLE>
#### EWING v. STATE.

No. 26324.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 25, 1953.

Clifton Tupper, San Angelo, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the sale of whiskey, in a dry area, with prior offenses alleged to enhance the punishment; the punishment, a fine of $750.

Inspector Ray, of the Liquor Control Board, testified that he went to appellant’s residence on the day in question and purchased one pint of whiskey from him. The witness stated that he later made several unsuccessful attempts to buy ardent spirits from the accused.

Appellant, testifying in his own behalf, admitted that Inspector Ray had been to his home several times, but denied that he had made the sale in question.

The jury resolved this issue of fact against the accused, and we find the evidence sufficient to support the verdict.

Appellant claims the trial court committed reversible error in overruling his objection to the charge. This being a misdemeanor case, it was incumbent upon the appellant, in addition to objecting to the charge and reserving an exception, to> also submit a substantially correct specially requested charge. This he did not do' and hence reversible error is not shown. Boedecker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 218 S.W.2d 198.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rotech Healthcare
Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Philip L. Carter, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Steven P. Alsene, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of each such officers
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|       | 
|       |  | /s/    PHILIP L.
CARTER              
|Name:  |  | Philip L. Carter                     
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | March 7, 2008                        
|       | 
|       |  | /s/    STEVEN P.
ALSENE              
|Name:  |  | Steven P. Alsene                     
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|Date:  |  | March 7, 2008                        

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.