alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Thomas F. Somogye, Respondent, v Sharon L. Somogye, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court did not abuse its discretion in terminating Mr. Somogye’s obligations to pay maintenance and utility expenses for the marital residence. Under a stipulation, those obligations were to continue only until Mrs. Somogye completed a course as a court stenographer and became fully employed. Since Mrs. Somogye quit the course before completing it, she prevented the occurrence of the condition upon which her husband’s obligations would cease. Family Court also properly denied Mrs. Somogye’s petition for upward modification of child support because she failed to establish that there had been a substantial change of circumstances *(see, Matter of Boden v Boden,*42 NY2d 210) or that the children’s needs are not being met *(see, Matter of Brescia v Fitts,*56 NY2d 132). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Sedita, Jr., J.—modify maintenance.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
#### STRALEY v. COMMISSIONERS’ COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY.

No. 10203.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

March 17, 1954.

J. J. Byrne, Lampasas, for appellant.

Abney, Hammett *&*Lynch, Gordon C. Cass, County Atty., Lampasas, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record in this cause should have been filed in this Court not later than September 28, 1953. It was received for filing by our Clerk on September 30, 1953.

Upon notification that the record had been received too late for filing appellant on October 1, 1953, filed a motion in this Court for an extension of time within which to file such record..

Proper notice of this motion was duly given appellee and no objection to the granting of such motion having been received we granted the motion on October 14, 1953.

Thereafter this case was set for submission and oral argument on the 10th day of February, 1954, attorney for appellee only appearing and arguing. Neither in such argument nor in its brief did appellee argue or assign as error our action in permitting this record to be filed.

On February 24, 1954, we handed down our opinion in which we reversed the judgment of the trial court and rendered judg*470ment protecting appellant from an unconstitutional deprivation of his property rights.

Appellee has now filed a motion for rehearing in which it for the first time complains of our action in granting an extension of time within which to file the record herein. This assignment is No. 66, the Motion for Rehearing containing 70 assignments of error. The prayer of the motion is only that we reconsider our original opinion and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Appellant’s motion for an extension of time set forth the following reasons as constituting good cause within the meaning of Rule 386, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure:

> “Appellant respectfully petitions this Court for permission to file the Transcript for the reason that the attorney representing the Appellant, J. J. Byrne of Lampasas, Texas, was laboring under the belief that the sixty days would not expire until September 30, 1953, as it did not occur to him that July and August had thirty one days in said months; that this Appellant would further show this Court that the Statement of Facts were not filed on time, and that an extension had to be obtained in the trial court for the filing of same, as will be reflected by said Transcript; that due to both factors the filing of the Transcript was delayed; that an extension of two days will permit this record to be heard by this Honorable Court.”

We do not believe these grounds meet the requirements of the Rule. Matlock v. Matlock, Tex.Sup., 249 S.W.2d 587.

We are also of the opinion that this is a matter which cannot be waived by the parties. Walker v. Cleere, 141 Tex. 550, 174 S.W.2d 956.

. The Motion for Rehearing is granted, our order granting appellant’s motion for an extension and our judgment heretofore rendered are set aside, our opinion withdrawn and judgment is now rendered" denying appellant’s Motion for an extension of time to file the record herein and dismissing his appeal.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with this annual report
on Form 10-KSB of Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings, Inc., I, Thomas E. Tuck,
Chief Executive Officer of Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings, Inc., certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




The
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and








/s/ Thomas E.
Tuck
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5266 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4,4’-Oxydiphthalic anhydride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. OLSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4,4’- 

Oxydiphthalic anhydride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4,4’-OXYDIPHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.13 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 4,4’-Oxydiphthalic anhydride) is amended by striking the 

7 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5266 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5445 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5445

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Captan technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Mr. Meehan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Captan technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPTAN TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         3a, 4, 7, 7, a-    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          tetrahydro-2-                                                      31/2015
                          [(trichloromethyl
                          )thio]-1H-
                          isoindole-1,3(2H)-
                          dione (Captan
                          technical) (CAS
                          No. 133-06-2)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2930.90.43)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Michigan Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Michigan Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 217    | 87     | 74     | 53    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 337    | 485    | 527    | 663    | 497    | 421    | 460    | 686    | 618    | 556   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 314    | 147    | 95     | 63     | 49     | 30     | 26     | 30     | 0      | 6     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145,040
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,813
<INVENTORY>                                     61,727
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               235,681
<PP&E>                                         664,672
<DEPRECIATION>                                 314,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 723,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          216,508
<BONDS>                                        142,941
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,922
<OTHER-SE>                                     263,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   723,400
<SALES>                                        276,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               276,237
<CGS>                                          245,815
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  265,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (534)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,459
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,604
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,855
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,855
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
        

</TABLE>
#### GOLDBERG v. SPENSE et ux.

No. 2747.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

June 12, 1947.

*331Clark & Seley, of Waco, for appellant.

J. A. Kibler and Tom M. Hamilton, both of Waco, for appellees.

TIREY, Justice.

This case is before this court on motion of appellees to affirm on certificate because of the failure of appellant to file transcript within the time provided by law. Appel-lees’ motion is subscribed and sworn to and in connection with said motion he has filed certified copy of the judgment entered by the court, together with certified copy of the supersedeas bond filed by the appellant. It appears that final judgment was entered in this cause in the court below on the 16th of January, 1947, and that appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled on February 8, 1947, and that appellant duly filed his supersedeas bond on the 28th day of February, 1947, which was duly approved by the Clerk of the District Court of Mc-Lennan County.

Under Rule 386, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure as amended by order of October 10, 1945, the sixty days therein provided for filing transcript and statement of facts expired on April 9, 1947, and no motion for extension of time in which to file same has been filed in this court, as may be done under the provisions of said Article. It follows that the time within which the transcript should have been filed in the Court of Civil Appeals has long since expired.

Appellees filed their motion to affirm on certificate on May 26, 1947, and it appearing to the court that the ten day notice provided for under Rule 387, T.R.C.P., has been given in this cause and this motion set for hearing on June 12, 1947, it follows, under the provisions of said Rule 387, that appellees are entitled to have the judgment of the trial court affirmed. See Texas State Life Ins. Co. v. Daiches, Tex.Civ.App., 149 S.W.2d 172, and authorities therein cited.

Appellees’ motion to affirm on certificate is granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as provided in Rule 387, aforesaid.
Exhibit 31

                               CERTIFICATION TO BE
                             PROVIDED WITH FORM 10-K

      Re:   Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2005-HE2 (the "Trust"),
            Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-HE2, issued pursuant
            to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2005,
            among Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Option One
            Mortgage Corporation, as a Servicer and a Responsible Party,
            Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as a Servicer, HomEq Servicing
            Corporation, as a Servicer, Decision One Mortgage Company LLC, as a
            Responsible Party, NC Capital Corporation, as a Responsible Party,
            Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., as a Responsible Party, Aames Capital
            Corporation, as a Responsible Party, Wells Fargo Bank, National
            Association, as Custodian, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,
            as Trustee, Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust, Series 2005-HE2
            --------------------------------------------------------------------

      I, Gail McDonnell, certify that:

            1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K (the "Annual
Report"), and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution reports
(collectively with this Annual Report, the "Reports") filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this Annual Report, of the Trust;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this Annual Report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the Trustee by each Servicer under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement, for inclusion in the Reports is included in the Reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in this Annual Report and required to be delivered to the Trustee in
accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and except as
disclosed in the Reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

            5. The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, that is
included in the Reports.


<PAGE>

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: the Trustee and the
Servicers.

Date:   March 30, 2006

/s/ Gail McDonnell
------------------
Gail McDonnell
President
#### GAINES v. STATE.

No. 24921.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 21, 1950.

No appearance for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for burglary, with the jury’s verdict assessing a penalty of three years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his affidavit to withdraw the appeal. We note, however, that the record contains an erroneous judgment in that it .first copies the jury’s verdict assessing the penalty of three years, based on the first count of the indictment. The judgment then recites “ * * * that he shall be punished, as has been determined by the jury, by confinement in the penitentiary of the State of Texas at hard labor for not less than Two (2) nor more than Three (3) years, * *

The judgment should read that he shall be confined in the penitentiary for a period of three years, as found by the jury, and it is now amended accordingly.

In the form which we find the record we decline to grant the motion to withdraw the appeal but affirm the judgment as amended.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5417 

To suspend temporarily the duty on insulated cable for a voltage of less 

than or equal to 1,000 volts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. HONDA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on insulated cable for a 

voltage of less than or equal to 1,000 volts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INSULATED CABLE FOR A VOLTAGE OF LESS 

4 THAN OR EQUAL TO 1,000 VOLTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Insulated cable for a voltage of less than or equal to 

1,000 volts (provided for in 

subheading 8544.42.90) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5417 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

Joseph Lanza

From: Jonathan Lee <jonathanvill00@gmail.com>

Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 5:25 PM

To: ZroBlack, LLC_003

Subject: Fwd: Sorry I missed your call

Sent from my iPhone 

Begin forwarded message: 

From: Jonathan Lee <jonathanvill00@gmail.com> 

Date: September 13, 2019 at 7:53:59 PM CDT 

To: Miguel.Villarreal@gunn-lee.com 

Subject: Sorry I missed your call

Hi Mike, 

Sorry I missed your call. 

I’m beside myself right now, and really struggling with everything, I can’t eat, I can’t sleep, my anxiety 

and stress is so high, and for the next 3 years if I continue like this I’ll end up losing my contracts and not 

be able to work. 

I have worked too hard to allow myself to slip like this. I need help Mike, this is not right. I’ve done 

nothing wrong. John got $750,000 cash, and there has to be a way for me to stop this madness, get him 

to give up the 2%, get my company website, my company documents, and my company computer. Like I 

said, I have a company that pays real taxes, has 10 real employees, we have a real physical location, and 

I can’t even put up my company website. 

I want to still see what you recommend but also, can you refer me to an attorney that can help me that 

you trust. I can’t deal with this stress anymore. 

Thank you, 

Jonathan 

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 2-21 Filed 05/08/20 Page 1 of 1
|   | 1. | I      have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K of      Oragenics, Inc.; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  April __, 2009 | /s/      David B. Hirsch     |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                            | David      B. Hirsch         |
|                            | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Standard Motor Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence I. Sills, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/S/ LAWRENCE I. SILLS
---------------------
Lawrence I. Sills
Chief Executive Officer
August 6, 2008


* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Standard Motor Products, Inc. and will be retained by Standard Motor
Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.