alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Spectrum
Control, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited) at February 28,
1999 and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited) for the three
months ended February 28, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to its Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 1999
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000092769
<NAME> SPECTRUM CONTROL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                              43
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                       403
<INVENTORY>                                      13990
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 26399
<PP&E>                                           33766
<DEPRECIATION>                                   17520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   46129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6984
<BONDS>                                           2481
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         14470
<OTHER-SE>                                       20062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     46129
<SALES>                                          15325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 15325
<CGS>                                            10913
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    10913
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  53
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1390
<INCOME-TAX>                                       527
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                863
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       863
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
#### Ex parte LEWIS.

No. 26782.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 13, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Charles S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Relator is held by the Sheriff of Dallas County by virtue of an extradition warrant issued by the Governor of the State of Mississippi, and upon the hearing of her application for a writ of habeas corpus, she was remanded by the trial court to the said •sheriff to be delivered to an agent of the authorities of said state.

To this ruling the relator excepted and .gave notice of appeal to this court.

We find no statement of facts of any kind in the record. However, the trial court, in his judgment herein, after having heard the .testimony offered relative to the matter, ■was of the opinion that the relator was legally held in custody' and under restraint by the Sheriff of Dallas County.

There .being, no statement of facts or stipulation of any kind in the record, we think the court was correct in thus holding the relator in custody.

The judgment of:the trial court is therefore affirmed.
----
                                                 | RH |
                                                  ----
______________________________________________________________________________
ROBISON, HILL & CO.                               Certified Public Accountants
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION





                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors
Geraco, Inc..


     We have issued a report dated July 26, 2001, accompanying the financial
statements of Geraco, Inc.. included in the Registration Statement Form SB-2
and the related prospectus.

     We consent to the use of this report, as stated above in the
Registration Statement.  We also consent to the use of our name in the
statement with respect to us appearing under the heading"Experts" in the
Registration Statement.

Respectfully submitted,



/s/ Robison, Hill & Co.

Salt Lake City, Utah







1366 East Murray-Holladay Road, Salt Lake City, Utah 84117-5050
Telephone (801) 272-8045 Facsimile (801) 277-9942

September 18, 2001
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Upstream
Biosciences Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that:

| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the
      period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                       

|Dated: February 2, 2009 | By: /s/ Tim Fernback                      
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|                        | Tim Fernback                              
|                        | Chief Financial Officer                   
|                        | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
|                        | Accounting Officer)                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Upstream
Biosciences Inc. and will be retained by Upstream Biosciences Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Standard Motor Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form


10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence I. Sills, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Lawrence I. SillsLawrence I. SillsChief Executive OfficerMay 6, 2011





*           A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Standard Motor Products, Inc. and will be retained by Standard Motor Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59018-59019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25370]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to section 1301.33(a) of title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on July 27, 2000, Chattem 
Chemicals, Inc., 3801 St. Elmo Avenue, Building 18, Chattanooga, 
Tennessee 37409, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
N-Ethylamphetamine (1475)..................  I
4-Methoxyamphetamine (7411)................  I
2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamine (7396)............  I
Difenoxin (9168)...........................  I

[[Page 59019]]

 
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II
Pentobarbital (2270).......................  II
Secodbarbital (2315).......................  II
Diphenoxylate (9170).......................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to bulk manufacture the listed controlled substances 
to produce products for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than December 4, 2000.

    Dated: September 25, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-25370 Filed 10-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of North State Bancorp (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Larry D. BarbourLarry D. BarbourPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Kirk A. WhorfKirk A. WhorfChief Financial OfficerMarch 28, 2005
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 12.1

         RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
                DIVIDENDS AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

The following table sets forth our ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
and preferred share dividends and our ratio of earnings to fixed charges for
each of the periods indicated:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                -----------------------------------------
                                2004   2003   2002(A)   2001(A)   2000(A)
                                ----   ----   -------   -------   -------
<S>                             <C>    <C>    <C>       <C>       <C>
Ratio of Earnings to
   Combined Fixed Charges and
   Preferred Stock Dividends    1.63   1.64     1.67      2.01     1.89
Ratio of Earnings to
   Fixed Charges                1.70   1.74     1.72      2.16     2.00
</TABLE>

(A)  Represents the operations of our predecessor through the date of
     commencement of our operations, July 12, 2002.

For purposes of calculating the above ratios, (i) earnings represent "Income
before equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries" from our consolidated
statements of income, as adjusted for fixed charges and distributions from
unconsolidated subsidiaries, and (ii) fixed charges represent "Interest expense"
from our consolidated statements of income. The ratios are based solely on
historical financial information.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6886

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

DAVID ISAAC MCGAHA, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III, 

Chief District Judge. (7:09-cr-00131-D-1; 7:12-cv-00068-D) 

Submitted: November 15, 2013 Decided: December 6, 2013 

Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Katherine Elaine Shea, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas Gray Walker, 

United States Attorney, Kristine L. Fritz, Jennifer P. 

May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

David Isaac McGaha seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that McGaha has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny McGaha’s motion to 

extend the time for filing a reply brief, and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sterling Group Ventures, Inc. (the
  Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2003, as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic
  Report), I, James M. Hutchison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

| | By: | /s/ James M. Hutchison
| | --- | ------------------------
| |     |                         
| |     | James M. Hutchison      
| |     | Chief Financial Officer 
| |     |                         
| |     | Date: August 28, 2003   

---
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5346 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Macroporous 

poly(divinylbenzene). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. DOLD (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Macroporous 

poly(divinylbenzene). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MACROPOROUS POLY(DIVINYLBENZENE). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.11 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Macroporous poly(divinylbenzene)) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5346 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
F ederal National Mortgage s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 20, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00233

- CV

Jeremiah MARTIN

, Appellant

v.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar Co unty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CV01933 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The clerk ’s record in this appeal was due on June 8, 2015 , but was not filed. On June 11,

2015 , this court notified Bexar County Clerk, Mr. Gerard Rickhoff

, by letter that he is the clerk responsible for timely filing the clerk ’ s record , and the record had not been filed. Our notice required Mr. Rickhoff to file the record no later than July 13, 2015

, unless appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record and is not entitled to the record without paying the fee, in which case Mr. Rickhoff was required to file a notice so advising the

court no later than June 22, 2015

. We received no response to our letter.

We ORDER Bexar County Clerk, Mr. Gerard Ri ckhoff, to file the record in this court on

or before August 19, 2015

.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the Bexar County Clerk, Mr. Gerard Rickhoff, and all counsel. Because “ [t]he trial and appellat e courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed, ” T EX .R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c), we

also order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial court.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Hughes & Company, Inc., Assignor, to Herbert P. Wilson, Assignee. 

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

October 29, 1957.

*William M. Kahn*for assignee.

*Edwin L. Smith*for Republic of Argentina.

Owen McGivern, J.

Motion for reargument granted and upon reargument the original decision denying a stay is adhered to.

When the original decision was issued the court was aware that the provisions of the Debtor and Creditor Law dealing with discharges in assignment proceedings were not presently effective, in view of the existence of the National Bankruptcy Act. These provisions were cited merely to indicate the legislative intent as to the limited scope of assignment proceedings. Such intent is no less manifest now than it would have been had the Bankruptcy Act not been passed.

The jurisdiction of this court to enter an order in the assignment proceeding enjoining a foreign sovereign is not established by cases such as *National Bank*v. *Republic of China*(348 U. S. 356) authorizing counterclaims against such sovereigns. The *17motion *sub judice*was made in the assignment proceeding, not in the action brought by the Republic of Argentina. By bringing an action in this court, the Republic did not consent that motions be made against it in all actions and proceedings pending in this court.

In his affidavit in support of the motion for reargument, the assignee for the first time, cites *United States*v. *Bank of New York Co.*(296 U. S. 463). In that case the Supreme Court of the United States held that the United States could not sue in the Federal courts the assignee for the benefit of creditors of a Russian insurance company, which assignee was functioning under the orders of this court. A principal basis for this decision was stated to be the duty of the United States Supreme Court *‘*to give effect to suc*h*methods of procedure as shall serve to conciliate the distinct and independent tribunals of the States and of the Union, so that they may cooperate as harmonious members of a judicial system coextensive with the United States’” (pp. 477-478). No such consideration is applicable here since both the assignment proceeding and the plenary action are pending in this court. The issue here is the scope of the assignment proceeding, a question purely of the law' of this State. The authorities cited in this court’s original opinion herein indicate that under New York law the stay should be denied.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Group Ventures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report"), I, Richard (Xuxin) Shao, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | By: | /s/ Richard (Xuxin) Shao
| | --- | ------------------------
| |     | Richard (Xuxin) Shao    
| |     | President & CFO         
| |     |                         
| |     | Date: August 28, 2013   

---