alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25312]



[[Page 58990]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-450-001]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

September 27, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 22, 2000, Natural Gas Pipeline 
Company of America (Natural) tendered for filing to be part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Second Revised Sheet 
No. 62, to be effective September 11, 2000.
    Natural states that the tariff sheet was filed in compliance with 
the Commission's ``Order Accepting Tariff Sheets Subject to 
Conditions'' issued September 8, 2000, in Docket NO. RP00-450-000 
(Order) related to revisions to its General Terms and Conditions, Rate 
Schedules FRSS, FTS, IBS and DSS and the pro forma service agreement.
    Natural requests any waivers of the Commission's Regulations to the 
extent necessary to permit the tariff sheet submitted herein to become 
effective September 11, 2000, consistent with the Order.
    Natural states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
parties set out on the Commission's official service list in Docket No. 
RP00-450.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-25312 Filed 10-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
{00185477.1}

UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT

IN LIEU OF MEETING OF

THE MEMBERS OF ZROBLACK LLC

The undersigned members hereby adopt the following resolutions on behalf of 

ZroBlack LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

WHEREAS, the persons signing this consent are all the members of ZroBlack LLC 

entitled and required to vote and consent at the meetings and on the following 

resolutions; 

WHEREAS, the undersigned wish to memorialize John Saenz’s assignment of his entire 

interest in ZroBlack LLC to Jonathan Villarreal;

WHEREAS, the undersigned desire to execute this unanimous written consent in lieu of 

formally holding a meeting, and agree that the adoption of the following resolutions 

shall be valid and have the same force and effect as though such resolutions had been 

adopted at formal meetings; therefore, be it:

RESOLVED, that John Saenz hereby assigns his entire interest in ZroBlack LLC to 

Jonathan Villarreal pursuant to Article VII of the “Limited Liability Company 

Operating Agreement for ZroBlack LLC” dated January 14, 2019 and applicable laws; 

and

RESOLVED, that the undersigned authorize the law firm of Gunn, Lee & Cave, P.C. to 

prepare, execute and file any documents necessary to effectuate the resolutions stated 

herein with the Delaware Secretary of State on behalf of ZroBlack LLC.

The undersigned direct that this unanimous written consent may be executed in 

multiple counterparts, all of which shall be considered originals and that this 

unanimous written consent, including multiple counterparts, be filed with the minutes 

of the proceedings of ZroBlack LLC.

DATED effective on _________________________, 2019.

By: ______________________________

 Jonathan Villarreal, Member

By: ______________________________

 John Saenz, Member

DocuSign Envelope ID: BD22414D-0AA8-47DA-948B-B71A3B0495DD Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-17 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6551

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

QUINDELL FORD, a/k/a Nephew,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:09-cr-00219-RDB-1; 1:12-cv-02848-RDB)

Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 25, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quindell Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Quindell Ford seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter, amend, 

or vacate a prior judgment. Ford’s motion sought 

reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Ford has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 5
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 2 of 5
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 3 of 5
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 4 of 5
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 5 of 5
MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT REGULATION IX PUBLIC RECORDS

4/20/05 Rule 902 1 RULE 902. DISTRICT'S REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

(Adopted 3-8-84; and Repealed April 20, 2005)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5524 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5524

  To suspend temporarily the duty on cast-iron engine crankcases for 
   marine propulsion engines, each measuring more than 1.1 meters in 
                                length.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on cast-iron engine crankcases for 
   marine propulsion engines, each measuring more than 1.1 meters in 
                                length.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAST-IRON ENGINE CRANKCASES FOR MARINE PROPULSION ENGINES, 
              EACH MEASURING MORE THAN 1.1 METERS IN LENGTH.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Cast-iron engine    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          crankcases for                                                    12/31/2015
                          marine propulsion
                          engines, each
                          measuring more
                          than 1.1 meters
                          in length
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8409.99.92)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
99.2








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Standard
Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the three months ended November 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Alexander B. Magallano, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1.    The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.     The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.








Date:
December 29, 2008





ALEXANDER B.
MAGALLANO


Alexander
B. Magallano


Chief
Executive Officer,


President
and Director








-1-
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|No chart available.                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Alaska (with Total Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5377 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,5-dimethyl-2, 5 hexanediol 

(dimethylhexanediol). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. FITZPATRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,5-dimethyl-2, 5 

hexanediol (dimethylhexanediol). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,5-DIMETHYL-2, 5 HEXANEDIOL 

4 (DIMETHYLHEXANEDIOL). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5377 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2,5-dimethyl-2, 5 

hexanediol 

(dimethylhexanediol) (CAS 

No. 110–03–2) (provided 

for in subheading 

2905.39.90) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2006146EN.01S00301.xml

| 22.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 22 June 2006, in Official Journal of the European Union C 146 A, the ‘Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — Third supplement to the 24th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/......). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/sales_agents_en.html).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L,C,CA,CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu.

Image

---
Exhibit 

Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 48-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 2
From: mark waltfairpllc.com

To: Yang Irene

Cc: Barry Shelton; Sidley - WSOU Litigation; Ryan Loveless; Jim Etheridge

Subject: RE: Re: WSOU - Microsoft - Markman Briefing

Date: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 8:20:21 AM

Attachments: Joint Stipulation Regarding Markman Briefing.docx

Irene,

Attached is a draft joint stipulation for submission to the Court. With the recent reduction in claim terms since yesterday, we think the

briefing limit should revert back to forty changes. This change is highlighted in the document.

Please confirm this is acceptable, add your signature block, and we will get this on file.

Sincerely,

Mark

 

Case 6:20-cv-00465-ADA Document 48-2 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 2
#### Andrew’s Estate.

*Practice, Supreme Court*— Findings *of fact*— Appeals—Collateral *inheritance tax appraisement.*

On. appeal to the Orphans’ Court from an. appraisement of a decedent’s real estate for collateral' inheritance tax purposes, the finding's of the court will not he disturbed where they are amply supported by evidence.

Argued Sept. 30, 1915.

Appeal, No. 167, Oct. T., 1915, by the Commonwealth, from decree of O. C. Washington Co., Nov. T., 1914, No. 44, valuing real estate for the purpose of assessing collateral inheritance tax, in Estate of Robert M. Andrews, deceased.

Before Mestrezat, Potter, Stewart, Moschzisker and Frazer, JJ.

Affirmed.

Appeal from appraisement for collateral inheritance tax. Before McIevaine, P. J.

From the record it appears that Robert M. Andrews died November 9, 1914, seized of certain real estate which consisted in part of an undivided 137.75 acres, in a large block of the Pittsburgh vein of coal, located in South Franklin Township, Washington County, Pa.

The said Robert M. Andrews was not survived by any wife or lineal descendants, and his whole estate was, therefore, subject to the payment of a collateral inheritance tax.

The appraiser, appointed by the register of wills to appraise decedent’s real estate for collateral inheritance tax purposes, appraised the coal in question at $150 an acre. On appeal from the appraisement, the court heard the matter de novo. Witnesses for the Commonwealth fixed the value of the coal at from $150 to $200 per acre; witnesses called by the estate, valued the coal at $90 to $100 per acre; the court valued the coal at $100 per acre. The Commonwealth appealed.

*321January 3, 1916:

*Error, assigned*was the decree of the court.

*Blame Aiken, G. L. V. Aeheson*and *J. Boyd Grumrine,*submitted for appellant.

*W. A. H. Mcllvaine, Harry L. Williams*and *J. R. MeCreight,*submitted for appellee.

Per Curiam,

This was purely a question of fact and there being ample evidence to sustain the court’s findings, they will not be disturbed.

Decree affirmed.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                       EXHIBIT 11 
                            THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES 
                          STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER-SHARE EARNINGS 
                              (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER-SHARE DATA) 

                              CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE 
 
 
                                                          THREE MONTHS                NINE MONTHS 
                                                       ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,         ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 
                                                   -------------------------   -------------------------
                                                       1997         1996           1997         1996 
                                                   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                                                <C>          <C>           <C>           <C> 
Net earnings.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  $   33,471   $   37,686    $   64,623    $   73,562 
Add interest on Convertible Debt, net of tax            2,063        2,105         6,201         6,270 
                                                   -----------   -----------   -----------   ----------- 
Net earnings applicable to common 
    stock and equivalents outstanding  .  .  .  .  $   35,534   $   39,791    $   70,824    $   79,832 
                                                   ===========   ===========   ===========   =========== 
 
Weighted average number of common shares 
   outstanding .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .     409,923      409,923       409,923       409,923 
Weighted average number of common shares 
    issuable upon conversion of Convertible Debt.      72,112       72,112        72,112        72,112
Dilutive effect of stock options after application 
    of treasury stock method  .  .  .  .  .  .  .         -            -             227            99
                                                   -----------   -----------   -----------   ----------- 
Weighted average number of common shares 
   and equivalents outstanding.  .  .  .  .  .  .     482,035      482,035       482,262       482,134 
                                                   ===========   ===========   ===========   =========== 
 
Net earnings per common share and equivalents 
    (Primary and Fully Diluted)  .  .  .  .  .  .        $.07         $.08          $.15          $.17 
                                                         =====        =====         =====         ===== 
 
 
 
                                                      Tab 1 
</TABLE>
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification**

I, Simon Braeutigam,certify that: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Chase Issuance Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided underForm 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 
 4.
Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 ofRegulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

 
 5.
All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certificationabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National Association. 

Date: March 30, 2023 

 
By: 
/s/ Simon Braeutigam
Name: Simon BraeutigamTitle: Chief Executive Officer (senior officer of Chase Card Funding LLC in charge of securitization)**