alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
**CERTIFICATION**

I, W. JAMES SCILACCI, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, of Southern
California Edison Company;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 8, 2004

                                               /s/ W. JAMES SCILACCI
                         ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 W. JAMES SCILACCI
                                 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Amendment No. 2 to this Registration Statement of
InterGlobal Waste Management, Inc. on Form 10-SB of our report dated March 26,
2001 (August 21, 2001 as to Note 18) (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to InterGlobal Waste
Management, Inc.'s ability to continue as a going concern), appearing in Part
F/S, which is part of such Registration Statement.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Los Angeles, California
August 24, 2001
WACO

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

CIVIL NO:

vs. WA:20-CV-00464-ADA

ORDER RESETTING MARKMAN HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is reset for

MARKMAN HEARING by zoom on Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 09:00 AM. The link for

the hearing will be sent by e-mail.

reset

zoom

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

8th day of March, 2021.

Alan D Albright

IT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

§

§

§

§

§

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

Case 6:20-cv-00464-ADA Document 55 Filed 03/08/21 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Lydia S. Shailer, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Queens County,

December 5, 1957.

*63
      *Nelson Smith Kirie, 2nd,*for Robert M. Shailer, petitioner.

*A. Lionel Levy*for State Tax Commission.

*Palmer, Series, Delaney, Shaw & Pomeroy*for Russell H. Shailer, respondent.

Anthony P. Savabese, S.

Testatrix died a resident of Connecticut leaving tangible and intangible personal property in Queens County. Under her will the entire estate is to be divided equally between her two sons who are nonresidents. Decedent’s son, Robert M. Shailer, the named executor, filed a petition for probate in this court. After the institution of this proceeding his brother, Russell H. Shailer, who knew of the existence of the will received letters of administration on his mother’s estate in Connecticut. Russell H. Shailer now moves to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Although testatrix was admittedly a resident of Connecticut and the two legatees are nonresidents, this court may, in its discretion, permit original probate of a will of a nonresident who dies outside the State, leaving personal property within this county. (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 45, subd. 3.) Under similar circumstances, jurisdiction was entertained where the will named a New York bank as executor. *(Matter of James,*167 Misc. 142.) In the instant case, testatrix named her son Robert as executor. Although not a resident of this State, he has petitioned this court to probate his mother’s will. No persuasive reasons have been presented why he should not be permitted to do so. The motion to dismiss the present proceeding is, therefore, denied. Since there is no real property in this jurisdiction, the petition and papers herein will be deemed to be amended so as to limit the relief to the probate of the instrument as a will of personal property. Submit decree on notice.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00478-ADA

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., §

EMC CORPORATION

ORDER RESETTING MARKMAN MARKMAN HEARING HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is reset for

MARKMAN HEARING by zoomoom on Thursday, May 06, 2021 at 10:30 AM.

reset

IT 21st day of April, 2021.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00478-ADA Document 95 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 1
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF APPEARANCE ADDITIONAL COUNSEL PAGE 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., 

DELL INC., AND EMC 

CORPORATION,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00473-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00474-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00475-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00476-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00477-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00478-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00479-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00480-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00481-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00482-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00485-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6 :20-cv-00486-ADA

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF ADDITIONAL COUNSEL

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Please take notice that Justin Allen of the law firm of Steckler Wayne Cochran Cherry, 

PLLC hereby enters an appearance as additional counsel for the Plaintiff in the above captioned 

case. 

All counsel are requested to send copies of future pleadings, orders, notices, and 

correspondence to Justin Allen at the law firm of Steckler Wayne Cochran Cherry, PLLC. Mr. 

Allen’s contact information is provided below:

Steckler Wayne Cochran Cherry, PLLC

8416 Old McGregor Road

Waco, Texas 76712

Telephone: (254) 651-3690

Facsimile: (254) 651-3689

Email: justin@swclaw.com

Case 6:20-cv-00479-ADA Document 118 Filed 10/22/21 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF APPEARANCE ADDITIONAL COUNSEL PAGE 2

Respectfully submitted,

STECKLER WAYNE COCHRAN CHERRY, PLLC

8416 Old McGregor Road

Waco, Texas 76712

Telephone: (254) 651-3690

Facsimile: (254) 651-3689

BY: /s/ Justin Allen_________

JUSTIN ALLEN

Bar No. 24081977

Email: justin@swclaw.com 

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF WSOU 

INVESTMENTS, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered electronically 

via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, on this the 

22nd day of October 2021.

\s\ Justin Allen

JUSTIN ALLEN

Case 6:20-cv-00479-ADA Document 118 Filed 10/22/21 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11.1


         COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Quarter Ended         Quarter Ended
                                                         June 30, 1997         June 30, 1996
                                                     -------------------     -------------------   
                                                                  Fully                  Fully
                                                     Primary     Diluted     Primary    Diluted
                                                     -------------------     ------------------
<S>                                                  <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>   
Net Earning (loss)                                   $   551     $   551     $  620     $  620
                                                     ===================     =================

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                                   9,014       9,014      6,465      6,465

Excess of shares issuable upon exercise of stock
  options over shares deemed retired under the
  "treasury stock" method                              1,027       1,065        639        769
                                                     -------------------     -----------------
Weighted average number of common
  and dilutive common equivalent shares
  outstanding                                         10,041      10,079      7,104      7,234
                                                     ===================     =================

Earnings (loss) per common and common
  equivalent share                                   $  0.05     $  0.05     $ 0.09     $ 0.09
                                                     ===================     =================
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.3

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen A. Wynn, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Wynn Resorts, Limited;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2012



/s/ Stephen A. WynnStephen A. Wynn Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Radames Ortiz, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), rendered September 23, 1988, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the prosecutor did not engage in bolstering during her examination of two infant witnesses or subsequently, when she commented on the testimony of another witness during her summation. Further, the *360defendant failed to register objections to the majority of the prosecutor’s summation comments which he now contends are improper and, therefore, has failed to preserve these claims for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Medina, 53*NY2d 951; *People v Brown,*158 AD2d 461, 463; *People v Bailey,*155 AD2d 467, 468). The remaining comments complained of either constituted fair response to statements made by the defense counsel in her summation *(see, People v Hansen,*158 AD2d 542, 543) or did not deny the defendant a fair trial. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Louisiana - South Onshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Louisiana - South Onshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 374    | 370    | 362    | 237    | 281    | 121    | 388    | 175    | 141    | 44    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 69     | 586    | 52     | 85     | 209    | 45     | 106    | 44     | 31     | 34    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 45     | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Western District of Texas

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Plaintiff

 v. DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC, 

EMC CORPORATION, AND VMWARE, INC. 6:20-CV-00486-ADA WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT 12/17/2021 /s/ Heather S. Kim Heather S. Kim (CA Bar No. 277686)

Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP

333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200

Redwood Shores, California 94065

hkim@kasowitz.com (650) 453-5170 (650) 453-5171

Case 6:20-cv-00486-ADA Document 135 Filed 12/20/21 Page 1 of 1
TS-AMID10/20/40

Attachment #7

Pt. 2, Sec. B, 1a 

Processing Information on the New Chemical Substances at Industrial Sites 

Controlled by Others 
TS-AMID10/20/40

Attachment #7-A

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substances at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by Others – Direct Additives in Flotation Products
TS-AMID10/20/40

Attachment #7-B

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substances at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by Others – Adhesion Promoters
<Page>

[Arthur Andersen LLP Letterhead]

                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to use of our report(and
to all references to our firm) included in or made a part of Registration
Statement No.333-62662.


/s/Arthur Andersen LLP
Arthur Andersen LLP

New York, New York
September 20, 2001
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MAYKEL TORRES

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 599

[ September 30 , 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Boober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13

- 17425CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Elijah Giuliano, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, L EVINE and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32

 

 

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO REQUIRED BYRULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OFTHE U. S. CODE

 

 

 

I certify,to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2003 of Norfolk Southern Railway Company fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofNorfolk Southern Railway Company.

 

 

 
| Signed: | /s/ David  R. Goode                    |
|---------|----------------------------------------|
|    | David R.  Goode                        |
|    | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|    | Norfolk  Southern Railway Company      |

 

Dated: July 30, 2003

 

 

 

 

I certify,to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2003 of Norfolk Southern Railway Company fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofNorfolk Southern Railway Company.

 

 

 
| Signed: | /s/ Henry  C. Wolf                          |
|---------|---------------------------------------------|
|    | Henry C.  Wolf                              |
|    | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
|    | Norfolk  Southern Railway Company           |

 

Dated: July 30, 2003
#### EVANS v. BROWN.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 19, 1953.

*63B. M. Westberry, Marion, for appellant.

Roderick E. Keeney, Smithland, for ap-pellee.

STANLEY, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Livingston County Court granting custody of two children in a habeas corpus proceeding instituted by their father against their mother and maternal grandparents.

The father relied upon a judgment rendered April 16, 1952, by the circuit court of Warwick County, Virginia, awarding him a divorce and the custody of the children. A copy of such a judgment bearing attestation of the clerk and seal of the court was filed in the proceeding. It was not authenticated in the manner and form prescribed by the Act of Congress, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1738, or KRS 422.040, since it is not certified by the judge of the Virginia court. Compliance with this method of authentication is prerequisite where it is sought to have full faith and credit given a judgment of a court of a sister state and other evidence is not receivable. Jones v. Hodgkins, 233 Ky. 491, 26 S.W.2d 19; Allen v. Commonwealth, 272 Ky. 533, 114 S.W.2d 757. Of course, such requirement may be waived. In the present case the respondent vigorously and continuously objected to the introduction and use of the purported Virginia judgment but the court overruled the objections. That was the basis of this proceeding and the court should have sustained the objections and declined to consider the proffered copy of the judgment. The judgment awarding custody of the children under the writ will be reversed on this ground.

We may point out, however, the statement in Chamblee v. Chamblee, Ky., 248 S.W,2d 422, that where the ultimate custody of children has been theretofore adjudicated, the issue may be reopened only in a court of equity, although habeas corpus is a proper proceeding to determine immediate and temporary right to possession of children. See also Chamblee v. Rose, Ky., 249 S.W.2d 775.

Judgment reversed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4989 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4989

     To suspend temporarily the duty on bicycle speedometer parts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on bicycle speedometer parts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BICYCLE SPEEDOMETER PARTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Bicycle             Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          speedometer parts                                                 12/31/2015
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          9029.90.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```