alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5498 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5498

  To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on plastic laminate sheets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mrs. Schmidt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on plastic laminate sheets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASTIC LAMINATE SHEETS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Plastic laminate    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          sheets consisting                                                 12/31/2015
                          of layers of
                          Polyethylene
                          Film;
                          Polyethylene
                          Coextrusion
                          Copolymer of Low
                          Density
                          Polyethylene and
                          Ethylene Acrylic
                          Acid; and
                          Aluminum Foil
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3920.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5459 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain smooth nonwoven fiberglass 

sheets. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. PITTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain smooth nonwoven 

fiberglass sheets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SMOOTH NONWOVEN FIBERGLASS 

4 SHEETS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5459 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Smooth nonwoven fiberglass sheets, approximately 

0.3 mm but not over 0.8 

mm in thickness, predominantly of glass fibers 

bound together in a polyvinyl alcohol matrix or 

modified acrylic—polyvinyl 

alcohol matrix with a formaldehyde emissivity below 

20 μgm·m¥2·hr¥1, in wide 

mats measuring between 

3.5 and 5 meters, the foregoing of a kind primarily 

used as carrier for cushion 

vinyl flooring (provided for 

in subheading 7019.32.00) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BERTHA SONIA CASTILLON

CAMPOSANO,

Petitioner,

v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
Respondent. No. 16

- 72476

Agency No. A072

- 810

- 969

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 12, 2018 **

Before: RAWLINSON, CLIFTON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Bertha Sonia Castillon

- Camposano , a native and citizen of Peru, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her
motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 15 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 72476

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a moti on to reopen.

Martinez

- Hernandez v. Holder , 778 F.3d 1086, 1088 (9th Cir. 2015) . We deny the
petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion or violate due process in denying

Castillon

- Camposano’s motion to reopen as untimely and in declining to equitably
toll the filing deadline for failure to show due diligence . T he motion was filed
more than three years after her final administrative order , and Castillon

Camposano did not sufficiently explain in her motion why she did not pursue her

ineffective assistance of c ounsel claim within 90 days of that order

. S ee 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2 ; Avagyan v. Holder
, 646 F.3d 672, 67 9 (9th Cir. 2011) (equitable tolling
of the filing deadline is available to aliens who act with due diligence in
discovering the deception, fraud, or error that prevented timely filing) ; Padilla

Martinez v. Holder
, 770 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014) (“ To prevail on a due

pr ocess claim, a petitioner must demonstrate both a violation of rights and
prejudice.” )

. Because the timeliness determination is dispositive, we do not address

Castillon

- Camposano’s contentions regarding the merits of her ineffective

assistance of counsel claim

. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir.
2004)

.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT F

Declaration of Richard M. Chen in Support of Microsoft Corporation’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment of No Infringement

Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 138-2 Filed 04/19/22 Page 1 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 138-2 Filed 04/19/22 Page 2 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 138-2 Filed 04/19/22 Page 3 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 138-2 Filed 04/19/22 Page 4 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 138-2 Filed 04/19/22 Page 5 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 138-2 Filed 04/19/22 Page 6 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 138-2 Filed 04/19/22 Page 7 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 138-2 Filed 04/19/22 Page 8 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 138-2 Filed 04/19/22 Page 9 of 10
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 138-2 Filed 04/19/22 Page 10 of 10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

SHAWN RAMSEY, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § C.A. NO. 1:20-cv-00494-RP

§

NORTHGATEARINSO, INC. et al. §

§ JURY DEMANDED

§

Defendants. §

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties

stipulate to the dismissal of the above-styled and numbered cause with prejudice, with each

party to bear his/her/its own attorneys’ fees and court costs.

Wherefore, Plaintiff and Defendant respectfully request that the Court enter an order of

dismissal with prejudice, with each party to bear her/its own court costs and attorneys’ fees.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kell A. Simon                

Kell A. Simon

State Bar No. 24060888

THE LAW OFFICES OF KELL A. SIMON

501 North IH-35, Suite 111

Austin, Texas 78702

(512) 898-9662 Telephone

(512) 368-9144 Facsimile

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

1

Case 1:20-cv-00494-RP Document 17 Filed 08/16/21 Page 1 of 2
/s/ Bruce Griggs               

Bruce Griggs

State Bar No. 08487700

Beth D. Adamek

Texas Bar No. 24097569

OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK

& STEWART, P.C.

301 Congress Ave., Ste. 1150

Austin, Texas 78701

512.344.4700

512.344.4701 Fax

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument has been served

electronically through the Court’s Electronic Case File Notification on this the 16th day of

August, 2021, to:

Bruce Griggs

bruce.griggs@ogletree.com

Beth D. Adamek

Beth.adamek@ogletree.com

OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK

& STEWART, P.C.

301 Congress Ave., Ste. 1150

Austin, Texas 78701

512.344.4700

512.344.4701 Fax

/s/ Kell A. Simon                   

Counsel for Plaintiff

2

Case 1:20-cv-00494-RP Document 17 Filed 08/16/21 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE

REBECCA MACIAS NELSON,

Relator.

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00175-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Relator Rebecca Macias Nelson’s unopposed

motion to dismiss original proceeding in mandamus and concludes the motion should be granted 

and Relator’s mandamus proceeding should be dismissed. We therefore dismiss this petition for 

writ of mandamus. We further order that each party shall be responsible for their own costs 

related to this proceeding.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2020.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2, 2017

a0424 

# Order

Clerk May 2, 2017

154248

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154248

COA: 332883

Oakland CC: 2015

- 254065

- FH

ANTHONY JEROME PITTMAN, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of January 31, 2017, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the

application for leave to appeal the June 17, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals. On order

of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented

should be reviewed by this Court.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 17, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0360

Lower Tribunal No. F07-12440A

________________

Ramon Pimental,

Petitioner,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.

Ramon Pimental, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Chief 

Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before MILLER, GORDO, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Denied. See Pimental v. State, 301 So. 3d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); 

Pimental v. State, 187 So. 3d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Pimental v. Jones, 

177 So. 3d 1270 (Fla. 2015); Pimental v. State, 195 So. 3d 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2015); Pimental v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 574 U.S. 980, 135 S. Ct. 473, 190 L. 

Ed. 2d 339 (2014); Pimental v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 560 F. App’x 942 (11th 

Cir. 2014); Pimental v. State, 83 So. 3d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Pimental v. 

State, 59 So. 3d 108 (Fla. 2011); Pimental v. State, 50 So. 3d 1148 (Fla. 3d 

DCA 2010); Pimental v. State, 20 So. 3d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); see also 

Knight v. State, 286 So. 3d 147, 151 (Fla. 2019) (“Properly understood, the 

fundamental error test for jury instructions cannot be met where, as in this 

case, there was no error in the jury instruction for the offense of conviction 

and there is no claim that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support that 

conviction. In such circumstances, one cannot plausibly claim that the 

conviction ‘could not have been obtained’ without the erroneous lesser 

included offense instruction or that the error vitiated the basic validity of the 

trial.”); Marshall v. State, 240 So. 3d 111, 118 n.7 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) 

(Generally, “appellate counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to predict 

future changes in the legal landscape that occur years after a defendant's 

sentence and conviction become final.”).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00454-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00461-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00465-ADA

PATENT CASE

FILED UNDER SEAL

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER DENYING MICROSOFT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE DAMAGES OPINIONS 

AND TESTIMONY OF WSOU’S EXPERTS

Before the Court is Microsoft Corporation’s Motion to Exclude Damages Opinions and 

Testimony of WSOU’s Experts. The Court, having considered the same, is of the opinion the 

motion should be DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this ____ day of _________________, 2022.

____________________________________

HONORABLE ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 161 Filed 04/27/22 Page 1 of 1
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

LIGHTING BALLAST CONTROL LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA 

CORPORATION,

Defendant,

AND

UNIVERSAL LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________ 

2012-1014

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas in case no. 09-

CV-0029, Judge Reed O’Connor. 

______________________ 

 

O R D E R

Oral argument, en banc, is scheduled for Friday, September 13, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 201. Each 

party will have 30 minutes to present oral argument. The 

parties shall notify the Clerk in writing by August 15, 

2013, of the name of the counsel who will present oral 

argument. 
2 LIGHTING BALLAST v. PHILIPS ELECTRON

 FOR THE COURT

Dated: May 10, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly

 Clerk
# NWF et al Comments on EPA White Papers

To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of National Wildlife Federation, Environm ental Advocates of New York, New Mexico Wildlife Federation, Pennfuture, and West Virginia Rivers Co alition, please accept the attached comments on EPA ’s white papers on methane emissions in the oil and ga s sector. Thank you. Jim Murphy National Wildlife Federation Senior Counsel 149 State Street Montpelier, VT 05602 802.552.4325 (Phone); 802.229.4532 (Fax); 802.595.5 268 (Cell) jmurphy@nwf.org If urgent, cell phone is the best number. Inspiring Americans to protect wildlife for our chi ldren's future. Read my blog
. 

### Murphy <jmurphy@nwf.org> Jim Mon 6/16/2014 5:02 PM
To: OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.go v>; 

###  1 attachment EPA methane WP NWF Comments_FINAL.pdf; 

### Page **1 of**  **1 NWF et al Comments on EPA White Papers** 
**- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 27/** **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             155
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,324
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,507
<PP&E>                                       2,605,474
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,517,040
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,544,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,501
<BONDS>                                        500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                     738,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,544,887
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               294,350
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                140,543
<INCOME-TAX>                                    53,944
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             86,599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    86,599
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5207 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain PCBTF with antistatic. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. MULVANEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain PCBTF with 

antistatic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PCBTF WITH ANTISTATIC. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1-Chloro-4- 

(trifluoromethyl) benzene 

(CAS No. 98–56–6) containing an antistatic (provided for in subheading 

3824.90.92) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5207 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Calif--San Joaquin Basin Onshore Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Calif--San Joaquin Basin Onshore Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 1      | 1      | -1     | -740   | 0      | 33     | -25    | W      |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5495 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5495

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain switchgear assemblies and 
    panel boards specifically designed for wind turbine generators.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

Ms. Schakowsky introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain switchgear assemblies and 
    panel boards specifically designed for wind turbine generators.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SWITCHGEAR ASSEMBLIES AND PANEL BOARDS SPECIFICALLY 
              DESIGNED FOR WIND TURBINE GENERATORS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Switchgear          Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          assemblies and                                                    12/31/2015
                          panel boards
                          specifically
                          designed for wind
                          turbine
                          generators in
                          excess of 2 MW;
                          designed to
                          transfer electric
                          power to and from
                          a utility power
                          grid at 2100 kW
                          at 600 V with a
                          nominal full load
                          of 2190 amperes;
                          each measuring
                          1950 mm or more
                          but not over 2050
                          mm in length, 550
                          mm or more but
                          not over 650 mm
                          in width and 1950
                          mm or more but
                          not over 2050 mm
                          in height;
                          capable of
                          monitoring
                          minimum wind
                          speed, yaw
                          position and
                          blade pitch angle
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8537.10.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```