alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1998        JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      21,012                  0
<SECURITIES>                                     0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                              146,786                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                13,882                  0
<INVENTORY>                                 86,086                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           243,396                  0
<PP&E>                                      83,876                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                              49,117                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             395,350                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      170,514                  0
<BONDS>                                          0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0                  0
<PREFERRED>                                      0                  0
<COMMON>                                     3,154                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                 199,967                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               395,350                  0
<SALES>                                    245,389                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           245,389                  0
<CGS>                                      129,659                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              129,659                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            83,501                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,736                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,602                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             26,789                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                11,519                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         15,270                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,270                  0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .93              (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .92              (1.13)

<FN>
NOTE* AS PER FASB STATEMENT NO. 128, EARNINGS PER
      SHARE, "PRIMARY" IS NOW "BASIC".

        

</TABLE>
**                                                        **BANGLA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.**                                                        **

**EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATIONS**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE *SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

I, Ping’an Wu, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that this report on Form 10-KSB of Bangla Property Management,  Inc. for the  period ending March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in this report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the  financial  condition  and results of operations of  Bangla Property Management,  Inc. 				December 14, 2005/s/ Ping’an Wu  Ping’an Wu, Chief Executive Officer				of Bangla Property Management, Inc.

----

10KSB – Period Ending March 31, 2005                         Bangla Property Management, Inc.                      Page 35

----
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00057

- CV

In the Interest of N.W. and N.W.C.,

Children §

§

§

§ From the 431st District Court

o f Denton Co unty (2003

- 60522

- 393)

September 19, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gardner



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in part of the trial court’s order

. We dissolve the permanent

injunction and modif y t he trial court’s final order to omit any reference to the

permanent injunction . It is ordered that the order of the trial court is affirmed as

modified.

It is further ordered that each party shall bear his or her own costs of this

appeal, for which le t execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ Justice Anne Gardner
#### F. & T. DEVELOPMENT CO., Inc. v. MORRIS et ux.

No. 15340.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

April 4, 1952.

Gerald S. Gordon, of Houston, for appellant.

Tabor Stone and Ted Robertson, -both of Houston, for appellees.

CULVER, Justice.

Suit was brought in district court of Harris County by Morris and wife, ap-pellees, against F. & T. Development Company, Inc., and Commercial Title Company, seeking specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, and, in the alternative, for liquidated damages. F. & T. Development Company moved for summary judgment, and appeals from the trial court’s action in denying that motion.

For a determination of this cause, it is only necessary to pass upon the second point presented, namely, that the trial court erred in overruling defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

While there are no reported cases in Texas so far as we know on this point, it is to be observed that Rule 166-A, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, follows almost identically the language of the Federal Rule 56 for Civil Procedure, 28.U.S.C.A., and the Federal courts have held adversely to appellant’s contention.

The refusal of a summary judgment is interlocutory in character and is not a final judgment, because the case still remains to be tried, bio appeal, therefore, *234would lie from such refusal. Jones v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 5 Cir., 108 F.2d 123; Morgenstern Chemical Co., Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 3 Cir., 181 F.2d 160; and Hiroshi Muramato v. Blidberg Rothchild Co., Inc., D.C., 94 F.Supp. 131.

Inferentially, the trial court in this case found that there were one or more disputed issues of fact and held the case for trial on its merits. The appellant has not been harmed, even though he may be correct in his position that there are no fact issues, on which point we express no opinion, as he will have his right of appeal should the case ultimately be decided' against him in the trial court.

Being of the opinion that the appellant has no right of appeal from the denial of motion for summary judgment, this appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Union Pacific
Railroad Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Richard K. Davidson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Richard K. DavidsonRichard K. Davidson
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
Union Pacific Railroad Company


November 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Union Pacific
Railroad Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, James R. Young, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ James R. YoungJames R. Young
Chief Financial Officer
Union Pacific Railroad Company


November 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Group Ventures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report"), I, Richard (Xuxin) Shao, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | By: | /s/ Richard (Xuxin) Shao
| | --- | ------------------------
| |     | Richard (Xuxin) Shao    
| |     | President & CFO         
| |     |                         
| |     | Date: August 26, 2010   

---
----

| Dated:  | April 15, 2010 |   | By:       | /s/ Ping’an Wu                               |   |
|--------------|----------------|--------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|         |           |   |      | Ping’an Wu, Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
|         |           |   |      | (Principal Executive Officer)                           |   |
|         |           |   |      |                                                    |   |
|         |           |   |      |                                                    |   |
| Dated:  | April 15, 2010 |   | By:  | /s/ Shuo (Steven) Lou                                   |   |
|         |           |   |      | Shuo (Steven) Lou, Chief Financial Officer,             |   |
|         |           |   |      | Chief Accounting Officer and Executive VP               |   |
|         |           |   |      | (Principal Financial Officer)                           |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5527 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5527

     To suspend temporarily the duty on fuel injection pumps (for 
 compression-ignition engines), each weighing 60 kilograms or more and 
 functional in a common rail fuel system with a pressure greater than 
                               1200 bar.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on fuel injection pumps (for 
 compression-ignition engines), each weighing 60 kilograms or more and 
 functional in a common rail fuel system with a pressure greater than 
                               1200 bar.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUEL INJECTION PUMPS (FOR COMPRESSION-IGNITION ENGINES), 
              EACH WEIGHING 60 KILOGRAMS OR MORE AND FUNCTIONAL IN A 
              COMMON RAIL FUEL SYSTEM WITH A PRESSURE GREATER THAN 1200 
              BAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Fuel injection      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          pumps (for                                                        12/31/2015
                          compression-
                          ignition
                          engines), each
                          weighing 60 kg or
                          more and
                          functional in a
                          common rail fuel
                          system with a
                          pressure greater
                          than 1200 bar
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8413.30.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2002 of Norfolk Southern Railway Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Norfolk Southern Railway Company.

                                  

Signed:

/s/ David R. Goode

David R. Goode

President and Chief Executive Officer

Norfolk Southern Railway Company

Dated: November 4, 2002

I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2002 of Norfolk Southern Railway Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Norfolk Southern Railway Company.

                                  

Signed:

/s/ Henry C. Wolf

Henry C. Wolf

Vice President

Chief Financial Officer

Norfolk Southern Railway Company

Dated: November 4, 2002

25
Exhibit 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the
Quarterly Report), of Southern California Edison Company (the Company), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the best of
his knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 3 , 2006



/s/    ALAN J. FOHRERAlan J. Fohrer Chief Executive Officer Southern California Edison Company/s/    THOMAS M. NOONANThomas M. Noonan Chief Financial Officer Southern California Edison Company


This statement accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### BLACK v. STATE.

No. 22685.

Oourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 19, 1944.

E. T. Miller, of Amarillo, and R. A. DeFee, of Dalhart, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a penalty of five years in -the penitentiary on a charge of rape.

The prosecuting witness, Mrs. Ruth Eslinger, testified to a state of facts supporting the indictment which charged rape by force, on June 29, 1942.

An abstract view of her story is not impressive. ’ It was denied, in toto, by appellant. .In lieu thereof, he detailed the night out with the prosecuting witness, including their relationship, which he said was by mutual agreement. The jury found in favor of the prosecution, but assessed a penalty of only five years *in*the penitentiary. The State’s evidence, if given full faith and credit by the jury, would have supported the extreme penalty.

The record contains several bills of exception, none of which present a serious question for qur consideration. All are directed to objections leveled at the admissibility of testimony. Appellant has presented no brief in the case, and the grounds of objections found in the bills fail to direct our attention very pointedly to what he has in mind. We have carefully examined each of these bills in the light of the statement of facts and are impressed that they pertain, in- a large measure, to immaterial and unimportant matters that have nothing to do with an •issue in the case. There is nothing inflammatory or to any degree harmful shown. It may be said definitely that they do not show error.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Lindsa

ySal o 1104N . Walnu t St. , Apt . 1 Lansing , M I 4890 6 Februar y8 , 201 2 Docke t Managemen t Facilit

y U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n Docket No . FAA-2012-008 9 120 0 Ne w Jerse yAvenu e S

A Wes t Buildin g Gran d Floor , Roo m W-12014 0 Washington , D

C 2059 0 Subject : Su n Countr

yslo t exemptio n Docket No . FAA-2012-008 9 I a m writin g t o reques t additiona l slot s b e authorize d throug h thi s exemptio n proceedin g so tha t Su n Countr yca n continu e it s curren t service patter n i n th e LAN-DC A markets . I trave l t o Washington , D.C . ofte n an d enjo yth e convenience an d affordabilltytha t th e Su n Countr yfligh t t o DC

A offers . DO T grantin g th e Su n Countr yexemptio n woul d no t adversel yaffec t safety . Th e exemptio n merel yallows Su n Count yt o continu e t o operat e th e existin g safe service int o an d ou t o f DC A tha t ha s bee n successfull yprovide d since Apri l o f 2011 . Than k you , Lindsa ySal o
```

[Federal Register: February 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 24)]
[Notices]               
[Page 5995]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05fe10-42]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DoD-2009-OS-0158]

 
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by March 8, 
2010.
    Title and OMB Number: Physician Certificate for Child Annuitant, DD 
Form 2828, OMB License 0730-0011.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 120.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 120.
    Average Burden per Response: 2 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 240 hours.
    Needs and Uses: This form is required and must be on file to 
support an incapacitation occurring prior to age 18. The form provides 
the authority for the Directorate of Annuity Pay, Defense Finance and 
Accounting Service--Cleveland (DFAS-CL/JFRA) to establish and pay a 
Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP) or Survivor Benefit 
Plan (SBP) annuity to the incapacitated individual.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: January 26, 2010.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-2454 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
Exhibit 5

Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 3 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 4 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 5 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 6 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 7 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 8 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 9 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 10 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 11 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 12 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 13 of 14
Case 6:20-cv-00462-ADA Document 48-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 14 of 14
#### E. Joseph Fontanella, Respondent, v Diane Fontanella, Appellant.