alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enesco Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel
DalleMolle, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  the operations of the Company.

November 13, 2003                     By: /s/ Daniel DalleMolle
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       30
##### 



AMERICA FIRST COMPANIES L.L.C.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
              1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



To the Company:
    
    America First Companies LLC1004 Farnam StreetSuite 400Omaha, NE 68102Attention: Chief Executive Officer
 4




---



##### 



Telephone: (402) 444-1630Telecopy: (402) 930-3047To Employee:
    
    At the Employees regular place of business
         AMERICA FIRST COMPANIES L.L.C.By
    
    /s/ Lisa Y. RoskensLisa Y. Roskens, President and Chief Executive OfficerEMPLOYEE/s/ James EganJames Egan
 5
EXHIBIT A

 

Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 1 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 2 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 3 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 4 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 5 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 6 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 7 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 8 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 9 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 10 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 11 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 12 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 13 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 14 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 15 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 16 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 17 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 18 of 19
Case 6:20-cv-00277-ADA Document 1-1 Filed 04/08/20 Page 19 of 19
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 521 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prevent the approval 

of genetically engineered fish. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2011 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself, Mr. WU, Mr. JONES, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. 

STARK, and Mr. POLIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

prevent the approval of genetically engineered fish. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PREVENTING THE APPROVAL OF GENETICALLY 

4 ENGINEERED FISH. 

5 Section 512(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos6 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(a)) is amended by adding at 

7 the end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(7) Notwithstanding any other provision of 

9 this section, a genetically engineered fish shall be 


srobinson on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 521 IH

1 deemed unsafe under this section, including for pur2 poses of section 402(a)(2)(C)(ii).’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of Data Call Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Timothy E. Vance, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Timothy E. Vance

Timothy E. VanceCEODated: March 31, 2010

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Data Call Technologies, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             677
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,167
<PP&E>                                         142,559
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (30,149)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,214
<BONDS>                                         41,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           129
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,120
<SALES>                                          5,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,694
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,698
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (230)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,928
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,928
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5396 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5396

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl N-(2-[[1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-
          pyrazol-3-yl]-oxymethyl]phenyl)- N-methoxycarbanose.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

    Mr. Graves of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl N-(2-[[1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-
          pyrazol-3-yl]-oxymethyl]phenyl)- N-methoxycarbanose.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYL N-(2-[[1-(4-CHLOROPHENYL)-1H-PYRAZOL-3-YL]-
              OXYMETHYL]PHENYL)- N-METHOXYCARBANOSE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Methyl N-(2-[[1-(4- Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          chlorophenyl)-1H-                                                 12/31/2015
                          pyrazol-3-yl]-
                          oxymethyl]phenyl)-
                          N-
                          methoxycarbanose
                          (CAS No. 175013-
                          18-0) (provided
                          for in subheading
                          2933.19.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-578-000]

Take notice that on September 29, 2000, Transwestern Pipeline Company (Transwestern), tendered for filing to become part of Transwestern's FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Eighth Revised Sheet No. 5B.03, to be effective November 1, 2000.

Pursuant to section 25 of the General Terms and Conditions of Transwestern's FERC Gas Tariff, Transwestern is filing a tariff sheet which sets forth the new TCR II Reservation Surcharges that Transwestern proposes to put into effect on November 1, 2000.

Transwestern states that copies of the filing were served upon Transwestern's customers and interested State Commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-25841 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### MEHARG v. STATE.

No. 23532.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 8, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin,, for the State.

*576GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of two years.

The indictment and all other matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5130 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5130

       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain time switches.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain time switches.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN INDOOR/OUTDOOR PROGRAMMABLE AND COUNTDOWN TIME 
              SWITCHES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Indoor/outdoor      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          programmable and                                                  12/31/2015
                          countdown time
                          switches for
                          greater than 60
                          minute control,
                          valued over $5
                          each (provided
                          for in subheading
                          9107.00.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 32-35 Filed 12/16/20 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

RONALD K. PAGE, on Behalf of Himself §

and All Others Similarly Situated, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-20-CV-617-FB

§

STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE §

COMPANY, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO

OBJECT TO THE MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND ORDER OF STAY

Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Leave to Extend Time to Object to the Magistrate’s

Report and Recommendation filed on March 16, 2022 (docket #144). Currently any written

objections to the Report and Recommendation issued in this case on March 10, 2022 (docket #143)

is March 24, 2022. 

The parties jointly seek leave and request a two-week extension of time, until April 7, 2022,

for either party to file any written objections to the Report and Recommendation. The extension is

sought due to the breadth of issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation as well as the

“parties’ need to comply with numerous deadlines in other cases, including other pending cases

against Defendant brought by Plaintiff’s counsel asserting claims comparable to those here.” The

timing of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation creates an objection deadline for the

parties which is in conflict with pre-existing deadlines and needs in other cases. The Court finds the

joint motion has merit and should be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Joint Motion for Leave to Extend Time to

Object to the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation (docket #144) is GRANTED such that the

deadline for the filing of objections by either party is extended to Thursday, April 7, 2022. Having

Case 5:20-cv-00617-FB-ESC Document 146 Filed 03/21/22 Page 1 of 2
granted the extension request, the Court further finds that given the breadth of the issues pending

before the Court, this case should be stayed until such time as the parties have the opportunity to file 

their objections, if any, to the Report and Recommendation and any responses and replies thereto.

Therefore, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is STAYED until such time as the

parties have filed objections, responses, and replies to the Report and Recommendation filed on

March 10, 2022 (docket #143) .

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED this 21st day of March, 2022.

 _________________________________________________

FRED BIERY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-

Case 5:20-cv-00617-FB-ESC Document 146 Filed 03/21/22 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                               
|Kansas Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                               
|Kansas Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 51     | 1      | 1      | 7      | 3      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 1      | 0      | 23     | 23     | 0      | 15     | 0      | 0      | 42    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### GAINES v. GAINES.

No. 12185.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Oct. 25, 1950.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 22, 1950.

*251Leonard Brown, San Antonio, for appellant.

Jack F. Ridgeway, San Antonio, for ap-pellee.

POPE, Justice.

This is a divorce suit arising under Article 4629, Sections (1) and (6), Vernon’s Ann. Civ. Stats.

John P. Gaines, appellee, married Gwendolyn Barton Gaines, appellant, in April of 1930. Their marriage difficulties progressively increased until their permanent separation in August of 1945. About fifteen months later the Bexar County Court adjudged appellant to be a person of unsound mind and committed her to the San Antonio State Hospital. In March of 1950, after appellee filed this divorce suit, the trial judge appointed a guardian ad litem, who defended this cause on behalf of appellant in the trial court and has appealed from a judgment granting a divorce.

Appellee’s divorce petition alleged cruel conduct on the part of appellant which occurred prior to their separation. The evidence upon which the trial court acted was also limited to occurrences prior to the separation, adjudication and commitment. This evidence was fully corroborated and amply showed physical, mental and verbal abuse by appellant of such duration and degree as to support the trial court’s decree, unless the provisions of Article 4629, as amended in 1941, prohibit this divorce.

Since five years had not elapsed between the adjudication and commitment by the County Court and the filing of this suit, appellee could not and did not endeavor to seek his divorce under the provisions of Article 4629 (6), relating to insane persons. He asserted his claim for divorce under Article 4629 (1), pertaining to excesses, outrages and cruelty. Appellant has founded her appeal on the proposition that appellee was restricted to the provisions relating to insanity, and for that reason contends that no divorce should have been granted.

Other courts have already passed on this same problem and have carefully analyzed the legislative intent as drawn from the history and wording of the present and prior divorce statutes. We believe that these statutes have been correctly construed by these decisions, and that it is unnecessary to reiterate the reasoning which is already embodied in decided cases. We hold that under the existing statutes an action for divorce may be maintained against an insane spouse, represented by a guardian ad litem, where the acts con-constituting the grounds for divorce were committed by such spouse prior to becoming insane. Powell v. Powell, Tex.Civ. App., 199 S.W.2d *285;*Robinson v. Robinson, Tex.Civ.App., 199 S.W.2d 256; Young v. Young, Tex.Civ.App., 41 S.W.2d 367; Jordan v. Jordan, Tex.Civ.App., 257 S. W. 569.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.