59710 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 195 / Friday, October 6, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

§ 39.13 [Amended]

2. Section 39.13 is amended by

adding the following new airworthiness

directive:

2000–20–05 Empresa Brasileira de

Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER):

Amendment 39–11916. Docket 99–NM–

356–AD.

Applicability: Model EMB–120 series

airplanes as listed in EMBRAER Service

Bulletin 120–32–0077, Change 02, dated

December 23, 1997; certificated in any

category.

Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane

identified in the preceding applicability

provision, regardless of whether it has been

modified, altered, or repaired in the area

subject to the requirements of this AD. For

airplanes that have been modified, altered, or

repaired so that the performance of the

requirements of this AD is affected, the

owner/operator must request approval for an

alternative method of compliance in

accordance with paragraph (d) of this AD.

The request should include an assessment of

the effect of the modification, alteration, or

repair on the unsafe condition addressed by

this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not

been eliminated, the request should include

specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless

accomplished previously.

To prevent the landing gear doors from

becoming blocked from opening during

application of emergency procedures in the

event of a loss of hydraulics, accomplish the

following:

Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision

(a) Within 10 flight hours after the effective

date of this AD, revise the ‘‘Emergency

Procedures’’ and ‘‘Abnormal Procedures’’

sections of the FAA-approved AFM by

inserting into the AFM a copy of EMB–120

AFM 120/794, Revision 45, dated October 14,

1996.

(b) For airplanes on which the check valve

has been installed in accordance with

EMBRAER Service Bulletin 120–32–0077,

dated February 7, 1997: Within 100 hours

after the effective date of this AD, conduct a

visual inspection to detect the check valve

flow direction in accordance with Service

Bulletin 120–32–0077, Change 02, dated

December 23, 1997. If the check valve is

installed incorrectly, prior to further flight,

reinstall the check valve in the proper

position in accordance with Change 02 of the

service bulletin.

(c) For airplanes on which the check valve

has not been installed in accordance with

EMBRAER Service Bulletin 120–32–0077,

dated February 7, 1997; or Change 01, dated

September 25, 1997; or Change 02, dated

December 23, 1997: Within 2,000 flight hours

after the effective date of this AD, install

hydraulic tube assemblies incorporating a

check valve in accordance with Service

Bulletin 120–32–0077, Change 02, dated

December 23, 1997.

Note 2: Accomplishment of the installation

in accordance with EMBRAER Service

Bulletin 120–32–0077, Change 01, dated

September 25, 1997, prior to the effective

date of this AD, is acceptable for compliance

with this paragraph.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

(d) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager, Atlanta

Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA.

Operators shall submit their requests through

an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance

Inspector, who may add comments and then

send it to the Manager, Atlanta ACO.

Note 3: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Atlanta ACO.

Special Flight Permits

(e) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to

a location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

Incorporation by Reference

(f) Except as provided by paragraph (a) of

this AD, the actions shall be done in

accordance with EMBRAER Service Bulletin

120–32–0077, Change 02, dated December

23, 1997. EMBRAER Service Bulletin 120–

32–0077, Change 02, dated December 23,

1997 contains the following list of effective

pages:

Page No.

Revision

level

shown on

page

Date shown on page

1, 2, 11, 12 ............................................................................................................................................ 02 December 23, 1997.

3–10 ....................................................................................................................................................... 01 September 25, 1997.

This incorporation by reference was

approved by the Director of the Federal

Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)

and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained

from Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.

(EMBRAER), P.O. Box 343—CEP 12.225, Sao

Jose dos Campos—SP, Brazil. Copies may be

inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,

Washington; or at the FAA, Atlanta Aircraft

Certification Office, One Crown Center, 1895

Phoenix Boulevard, suite 450, Atlanta,

Georgia; or at the Office of the Federal

Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite

700, Washington, DC.

Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed

in Brazilian airworthiness directive 97–05–

03R2, dated March 16, 1998.

Effective Date

(g) This amendment becomes effective

on November 13, 2000.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on

September 26, 2000.

Donald L. Riggin,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 00–25150 Filed 10–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 99–NM–26–AD; Amendment

39–11902; AD 2000–19–01]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier

Model CL–600–1A11 (CL–600) and CL–

600–2A12 (CL–601) Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

SUMMARY: This document corrects a

typographical error that appeared in

airworthiness directive (AD) AD 2000–

19–01 that was published in the Federal

Register on September 20, 2000 (65 FR

56780). The typographical error resulted

in failure to reference an acceptable

method of compliance for a certain

requirement. This AD is applicable to

certain Bombardier Model CL–600–

1A11 (CL–600) and CL–600–2A12 (CL–

601) series airplanes. This AD requires

modification of the main landing gear

(MLG) brake units and inboard MLG

wheels; and a revision to the Airplane

Flight Manual (AFM) to include the

increased cooling times for the modified

brakes. This AD allows, for certain

cases, removal of the inboard and/or

outboard wheel discs by installation of

a placard to limit airplane operation on

the ground and a revision to the AFM

to include information for operating the

airplane with the wheel discs removed.

Additionally, this AD provides for an

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 195 / Friday, October 6, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 59711

acceptable method of compliance that

involves installation of a new revision

to the AFM.

DATES: Effective October 25, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James E. Delisio, Aerospace Engineer,

Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE–

171, FAA, New York Aircraft

Certification Office, 10 Fifth Street,

Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York

11581; telephone (516) 256–7521; fax

(516) 568–2716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2000–19–

01, amendment 39–11902, applicable to

certain Bombardier Model CL–600–

1A11 (CL–600) and CL–600–2A12 (CL–

601) series airplanes, was published in

the Federal Register on September 20,

2000 (65 FR 56780). That AD requires

modification of the main landing gear

(MLG) brake units and inboard MLG

wheels; and a revision to the Airplane

Flight Manual (AFM) to include the

increased cooling times for the modified

brakes. That AD allows, for certain

cases, removal of the inboard and/or

outboard wheel discs by installation of

a placard to limit airplane operation on

the ground and a revision to the AFM

to include information for operating the

airplane with the wheel discs removed.

Additionally, that AD provides for an

acceptable method of compliance that

involves installation of a new revision

to the AFM.

As published, paragraph (d) of the

existing AD specifies that installation of

a specific AFM revision is acceptable for

compliance with the requirements of

paragraphs (a) and (b) of that AD. The

FAA inadvertently did not specify that

installation of a specific AFM revision

is also acceptable for compliance with

the requirements of paragraph (c) of that

AD.

Since no other part of the regulatory

information has been changed, the final

rule is not being republished.

The effective date of this AD remains

October 25, 2000.

§ 39.13 [Corrected]

On page 56782, in the second column,

paragraph (d) of AD 2000–19–01 is

corrected to read as follows:

* * * * *

(d) For all airplanes: Installation of

the AFM revision specified in either

paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this AD, as

applicable, is acceptable for compliance

with the requirements of paragraphs (a),

(b), and (c) of this AD, as applicable.

(1) Bombardier Model CL–600–1A11

(CL–600) AFM Revisions A84 and 76,

both dated February 7, 2000; or

(2) Bombardier Model CL600–2A12

(CL–601) AFM Revisions 45, 48, 50, and

86, all dated February 7, 2000.

* * * * *

Issued in Renton, Washington, on October

2, 2000.

Donald L. Riggin,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 00–25684 Filed 10–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 00–ASO–28]

Amendment of Class E Airspace;

Picayune, MS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E

airspace at Picayune, MS. Picayune—

Pearl River County Airport has closed

and a new airport has been established

approximately 3.5 miles southeast of the

Picayune—Pearl River County Airport

site. The name of the new airport is

Picayune Municipal Airport. Area

Navigation (RNAV) Runway (RWY) 18

and RWY 36 Standard Instrument

Approach Procedures (SIAPs) have been

developed for Picayune Municipal

Airport. As a result, controlled airspace

extending upward from 700 feet Above

Ground Level (AGL) is needed to

accommodate the SIAPs at Picayune

Municipal Airport. This action also

changes the name of the airport in the

airspace description from Picayune—

Pearl River County to Picayune

Municipal Airport.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, January 25,

2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy B. Shelton, Manager, Airspace

Branch, Air Traffic Division, Federal

Aviation Administration, P.O. Box

20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320;

telephone (404) 305–5586.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

On August 18, 2000, the FAA

proposed to amend part 71 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 71) by amending Class E airspace

at Picayune, MS, (65 FR 50470) to

contain the RNAV RWY 18 and 39

SIAPs developed for the Picayune

Municipal Airport. Class E airspace

designations are published in Paragraph

6005 of FAA Order 7400.9H, dated

September 1, 2000, and effective

September 16, 2000, which is

incorporated by reference in 15 CFR

71.1, dated September 1, 1999. The

Class E airspace designations listed in

this document will be published

subsequently in the Order.

Interested parties were invited to

participate in this rulemaking

proceeding by submitting written

comments on the proposal to the FAA.

No comments objecting to the proposal

were received.

The Rule

This amendment to Part 71 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 71) amends Class E airspace at

Picayune, MS. This action also changes

the name of the airport in the airspace

description from Picayune—Pearl River

County to Picayune Municipal Airport.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore, (1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,

CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D AND

CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS;

AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING

POINTS

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

Part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,

40120; EO 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 14 CFR 11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation