alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.29

                             UNIVERSAL CORPORATION

                         AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AND
                        EQUITY ACCUMULATION AGREEMENTS

     This Amendment dated this 15th day of March, 1999, is made to the Agreement
or Agreements listed on Exhibit A (the "Option Agreements", whether one or more)
between Universal Corporation (the "Company") and __________ (the "Optionee").

     The Company and the Optionee agree to amend each of the Option Agreements
as follows:

1.   Subparagraph 6.F. of each Option Agreement is hereby deleted and amended to
read in its entirety as follows:

          F.   Exercise in the Event of Retirement, Death, or Disability or
               ------------------------------------------------------------
     Approval by the Committee. Subject to the provisions of subparagraph 6H
     -------------------------
     which shall apply to exercise in the event the Optionee terminates his or
     her participation in the Automatic Exercise Program as provided in
     subparagraph 5G(i), all unexercised Long Term and Reload Options that have
     vested pursuant to paragraph 3 shall be exercisable in whole or in part in
     the event that prior to the Expiration Date (i) the Optionee retires
     (early, after age 55, normal, at age 65, or delayed) or, (ii) the Optionee
     dies or becomes permanently and totally disabled (as defined in the
     Disability Benefits Plan of Universal Leaf Tobacco Company, Incorporated
     and Domestic Subsidiaries) while employed by the Company or an Affiliate or
     (iii) for any reason approved by the Committee in its absolute discretion.
     In the event of death, such Options may be exercised by the Optionee's
     estate, or the person or persons to whom his or her rights under this
     Agreement shall pass by will or the laws of descent and distribution.
     Options that become exercisable pursuant to this subparagraph 6F will
     continue to be exercisable for the remainder of the period preceding the
     Expiration Date.

2.   Except as expressly amended hereby, the Option Agreements shall remain in
full force and effect in all respects and are hereby ratified and affirmed.

     In Witness Whereof, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by a
duly authorized officer, and Optionee has affixed his or her signature hereto.

UNIVERSAL CORPORATION                         OPTIONEE


By: _______________________________________   __________________________________
     William L. Taylor, Vice President and             [Optionee Name]
          Chief Administrative Officer
<PAGE>


                                 EXHIBIT A TO

                             UNIVERSAL CORPORATION

                         AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AND
                        EQUITY ACCUMULATION AGREEMENTS


1.   1991 Stock Option and Equity Accumulation Agreement dated December 5, 1991,
as amended by an Amendment dated April 27, 1992.

2.   1994 Stock Option and Equity Accumulation Agreement dated December 1, 1994.
**Exhibit 31.2**

***Certificate of ChiefFinancial OfficerPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

** **

I, Paul R.M. Demmink, certify that:

1.                Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September27, 2003 of Speizman Industries, Inc.(the “registrant”);

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report.

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;

b.  Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure control’s andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.  Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

  

Date:     November 12, 2003

 

|   | */s/ Paul R.M.    Demmink*                          Paul R.M. DemminkChief Financial Officer |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

LUIS EDGARDO MARTINEZ-NIEVES,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

ANDREW SAUL, SOCIAL SECURITY 

COMMISSIONER,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

SA-20-CV-00538-ESC

FINAL JUDGMENT

On this day, the Court granted the Commissioner’s unopposed motion to reverse and 

remand this action under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative 

proceedings. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the final 

decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff’s application for benefits under Title II of the 

Social Security Act is reversed and this case is remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 

405(g) for further administrative proceedings. Upon remand, the Appeals Council is to direct the 

administrative law judge to take any steps necessary to develop the administrative record, 

provide the claimant an opportunity for a new hearing, and issue a new decision. 

SIGNED this 5th day of March, 2021.

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00538-ESC Document 18 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 138    | 397    | 250   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 206    | 251    | 171    | 63     | 113    | 108    | 108    | 71     | 626    | 502   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 562    | 289    | 413    | 461    | 264    | 127    | 106    | 108    | 361    | 430   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 274    | 2,120  | 1,222  | 1,215  | 1,017  | 1,795  | 1,980  | 2,812  | 2,294  | 3,346 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,838  | 2,015  | 1,563  | 1,352  | 1,070  | 874    | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
  
           COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
           -------------------------------------------------
                (In Millions of Dollars, Except Ratios)
                              (Unaudited)
  
                                                          Three Months  
                                                         Ended March 31,
                                                         ---------------
                                                       1998           1997 
                                                       ----           ---- 
  Earnings:
    Income from continuing operations. . . . . . . .   $(32)          $170 
  
    Undistributed equity earnings. . . . . . . . . .    (10)            (8)
                                                       ----           ---- 
    Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    (42)           162 
                                                       ----           ---- 
  Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    (31)            98 
                                                       ----           ---- 
  Fixed Charges:
  
    Interest expense including amortization         
         of debt discount. . . . . . . . . . . . . .    135            122 
    Portion of rentals representing an interest
         factor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     43             47 
                                                       ----           ---- 
         Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    178            169 
                                                       ----           ---- 
  
  Earnings available for fixed charges . . . . . . .    105            429 
                                                       ====           ==== 
  
  Fixed Charges -- as above. . . . . . . . . . . . .   $178           $169 
   
  Interest capitalized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      -              - 
                                                       ----           ---- 
  
         Total fixed charges . . . . . . . . . . . .   $178           $169 
                                                       ====           ==== 
  
  
  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (Note 4). . . .     .6            2.5 
                                                       ====           ====
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SPECTRUM CONTROL, INC. CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT FEBRUARY 29,
1996, AND CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE-MONTH
PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFER-
ENCE TO ITS FORM 10-Q FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000092769
<NAME> SPECTRUM CONTROL INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-1996
<CASH>                                             309
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,162
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,245
<PP&E>                                          38,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,951
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        13,545
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,666
<SALES>                                         13,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,869
<CGS>                                            9,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,104
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    990
<INCOME-TAX>                                       277
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                713
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with section 3(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (62 Stat. 906 as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1274), notice is hereby given that the official, detailed boundary maps, drawing number 651-80000, dated March 6, 2000, for the Missouri National Recreational River are completed and available. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Superintendent Missouri National Recreational River, P.O. Box 591, O'Neill, Nebraska 68763-0591, telephone 402-336-3970. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On November 10, 1978, the 59-mile segment of the Missouri River from Gavins Point Dam, South Dakota to Ponca State Park, Nebraska, was designated a recreational river by Public Law 95-625, an amendment to the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. In accordance with section 3 (c) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, notice is hereby given that the above said maps are now available for inspection at the following locations: The Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Land Resources Division, 1849 C Street NW, Room 2444, Washington, D.C.; National Park Service, Midwest Regional Office, Office of Planning, 1709 Jackson St., Omaha, Nebraska; Missouri National Recreational River Headquarters, 114 N. 6th St., O'Neill, Nebraska; Cedar County Courthouse, County Clerk's Office, 101 S. Broadway Hartington, Nebraska; Clay County Courthouse, County Clerk's Office, 211 W. Main St., Vermillion, South Dakota; Dixon County Courthouse, County Clerk's Office, 302 3rd St., Ponca, Nebraska; Union County Courthouse, County Clerk's Office, 209 E. Main, Elk Point, South Dakota; Yankton County Courthouse, County Clerk's Office, 321 W. 3rd St., Yankton, South Dakota. Copies of the maps are also available in public libraries in Hartington and Ponca, Nebraska, and Yankton, Vermillion, and Elk Point, South Dakota. Please address any questions or requests to the Superintendent at the address given above. 

Dated: September 22, 2000.

Catherine A. Damon, 

Acting Regional Director. 

[FR Doc. 00-25252 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
STEPHANIE HUDNALL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3352

_________________________/

Opinion filed February 6, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Stephanie Hudnall, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., WOLF and B.L. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 6 

Case 6:20-cv-00245-ADA Document 48-4 Filed 11/09/21 Page 1 of 3
1526 Gilpin Avenue

Wilmington, Delaware 19806

United States of America

Tel: 302-449-9010

Fax: 302-353-4251

www.devlinlawfirm.com

OCTOBER 25, 2021

Travis Jensen

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015

Telephone: (650) 614-7458

Facsimile: (512) 263-2166

tjensen@orrick.com

Re: Caddo Systems, Inc. Et al. V. Microchip Technology Incorporated, C.A. No. 6:20-

cv-00245-ADA (W.D. Tex.)

Travis,

We write in response to Microchip’s October 15, 2021 letter (“Letter”) regarding 

Caddo Systems Inc.’s and 511 Technologies Inc.’s (“Caddo”) June 11, 2021 Final 

Infringement Contentions (“FICs”). Caddo addresses Microchip’s concerns in its Letter 

below. 

As stated in Caddo’s October 1, 2021 letter (“October 1 Letter”), once again 

Microchip’s alleged concerns regarding Caddo’s FICs are not directed to whether Caddo

has provided sufficient notice of its infringement theories, but rather to arguments about 

Microchip’s non-infringement theories. But because Microchip does not dispute that it is 

on notice, nothing more is required. See, e.g., Motion Games, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., 

No. 6:12-cv-878, 2015 WL 1774448, at *2 (E. D. Tex. Apr. 16, 2015) (“Infringement 

contentions are not intended to act as a forum for argument about the substantive issues 

but rather serve the purpose of providing notice to the Defendants of infringement 

theories beyond the mere language of the patent claim”). 

Here, for the first time ever in this ligation and more than six months after the 

Court issued its claim construction order, Microchip raises issues pertaining to the 

meaning of the claim term “browse” in the ’301 and the ’836 patents. Microchip could 

have construed this term during claim construction but chose not to do so. Microchip has 

therefore waived all arguments regarding what the term “browse” should or should not 

mean. Also, Caddo maintains that Microchip’s Accused Instrumentalities, redesigned or 

otherwise, still infringe the asserted claims of the ’301 and ’836 patents, as clearly set 

forth in Caddo’s FICs. 

Case 6:20-cv-00245-ADA Document 48-4 Filed 11/09/21 Page 2 of 3
Devlin Law Firm

October 25, 2021

Page 2 of 2

Caddo notes this is the second letter from Microchip which provides noninfringement arguments under the guise of disputing the sufficiency of Caddo’s FICs. 

Caddo maintains it has sufficiently demonstrated its infringement theories in its FICs, and 

will not be withdrawing its asserted claims against Microchip’s Accused 

Instrumentalities, redesigned or otherwise, in connection with the ’301 and ’836 patents.

* * *

If Microchip prefers to meet and confer again on any of the issues identified 

herein, Caddo is available. 

Sincerely,

/s/ Alex Chan

 Alex Chan

Case 6:20-cv-00245-ADA Document 48-4 Filed 11/09/21 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7782
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT L. MACKEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-01-457, CA-02-1314-0) Submitted: March 7, 2003 Decided: March 27, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert L. Mackey, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert L. Mackey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mackey has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , U.S. , 2003 WL 431659, at *10 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2003) (No. 01-7662). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report of NuRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Harin
Padma−Nathan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
December 24, 2008


/s/
                  Harin
      Padma−NathanName:
                  Harin
      Padma−NathanTitle:
                  President
      & Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)