alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58983-58984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Commodity Credit Corporation


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m., October 10, 2000.

PLACE: Room 104-A, Jamie L. Whitten Building, U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Approval of the Minutes of the Open Meeting of May 17, 1999.
    2. Memorandum re: Update of Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC)-
Owned Inventory.
    3. Memorandum re: Settlement Actions Report.
    4. Memorandum re: CCC Stocks Available for Donation Overseas Under 
Section 416(b) of the Agricultural Act of 1949, as Amended, for Fiscal 
Years 1998, 1999, and 2000.

[[Page 58984]]

    5. Docket A-POL-98-007, Rev. 1, re: Commodity Credit Corporation 
Claims Policy.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Juanita B. Daniels, Acting 
Secretary, Commodity Credit Corporation, Stop 0571, U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-0571.

    Dated: September 28, 2000.
Juanita B. Daniels,
Acting Secretary, Commodity Credit Corporation.
[FR Doc. 00-25420 Filed 9-28-00; 4:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-U
BRANSON JEWELRY (USA), INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATIONS
-----------------------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Kevan Attwood, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that this report on Form 10-KSB of Branson Jewelry
(USA),  Inc for the  period  ending  March  31,  2004  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in this report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents
in all material  respects the  financial  condition and results of operations of
Branson Jewelry (UAS), Inc.

June 28, 2004

/s/ Kevan Attwood
---------------------------------
Kevan Attwood, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
President & Director of Branson Jewelry (USA), Inc.




























--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form 10KSB - For the period ending March 31, 2004                      Page 27
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 195 (Friday, October 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25666]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

September 28, 2000.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before November 6, 
2000. to be assured of consideration.

Customs Service (CUS)

    OMB Number: 1515-002.
    Form Number: Customs Form 4315.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Application for Allowance in Duties.
    Description: This collection is required by the Customs Service in 
instances of claims of damaged or defective merchandise on which an 
allowance in duty is made in the liquidation of the entry. The 
information is used to substantiate importers claims for such duty 
allowances.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Individuals or 
households, Not-for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 12,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 8 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 1,600 hours.
    Clearance Officer: J. Edgar Nichols (202) 927-1426, U.S. Customs 
Service, Information Services Branch, Ronald Reagan Building, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 3.2.C, Washington, DC 20229.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25666 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-U
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5135 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5135

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain tamper resistant ground 
                      fault circuit interrupters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain tamper resistant ground 
                      fault circuit interrupters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TAMPER RESISTANT GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Ground fault        Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          circuit                                                           12/31/2015
                          interrupter
                          (GFCI)
                          receptacles
                          designed to
                          prevent insertion
                          of foreign
                          objects, each
                          with internal
                          shutters and
                          clearly marked TR
                          (`tamper
                          resistant'),
                          certified by the
                          importer as
                          meeting the 2008
                          National Electric
                          Code Section
                          406.11 for 15
                          ampere or 20
                          ampere
                          receptacles
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8536.30.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
----

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1) (2)

(2006/C 135/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

GERMANY

Operating licences granted

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

----

(1)OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

----
|                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                  
|Calif--San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                  
|Calif--San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 2      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 32-32 Filed 12/16/20 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Texas--RRC District 8A Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Texas--RRC District 8A Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 156    | 3      | 4      | 0      | 23     | 3     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 26     | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Merit Systems Protection Board

          - 5 CFR Part 1201 

# AGENCY:

Merit Systems Protection Board. 

# ACTION:

Final rule.

# SUMMARY:

The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or the Board) is amending its rules of practice and procedure in this part to reflect the relocation of its Washington Regional Office. On September 11, 2000, the Board relocated its Washington Regional Office from 5203 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, Virginia, to 1800 Diagonal Road, Alexandria, Virginia. Appendix II of this part is amended to show the new address. The facsimile number and the geographical areas served by the Washington Regional Office are unchanged. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 3, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert E. Taylor, Clerk of the Board, (202) 653-7200. 

The Board is publishing this rule as a final rule pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1204(h). 

# List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 1201.

        - Administrative practice and procedure
        - Civil rights
        - Government employees

Accordingly, the Board amends 5 CFR part 1201 as follows: 

# PART 1201—PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES 

1. The authority citation for part 1201 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:5 U.S.C. 1204 and 7701, unless otherwise noted. 

2. Amend Appendix II to 5 CFR part 1201 in item 4. by removing “5203 Leesburg Pike, Suite 1109, Falls Church, Virginia 22041-3473” and adding, in its place “1800 Diagonal Road, Alexandria, Virginia 22314”. 

Dated: September 27, 2000. 

Robert E. Taylor,

Clerk of the Board.

[FR Doc. 00-25282 Filed 10-2-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7400-01-P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-116141 on Form S-8 and Registration StatementNo. 333-109779 on Form S-8 of our reports relating to the financial statements of Citadel Broadcasting Corporation and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting dated March 11, 2005, appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Citadel Broadcasting Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 11, 2005
Case 6:20-cv-00393-ADA Document 7 Filed 03/24/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 6:20-cv-00393-ADA Document 7 Filed 03/24/20 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Joseph Armone, Petitioner, against Thomas J. McHugh et al., as Commissioners of Correction of the State of New York, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

December 9, 1957.

*259
      *Harris B. Steinberg*for petitioner.

*Louis J. Lefkowits, Attorney-General,*for respondents.

Harold A. Stevens, J.

This article 78 proceeding raises the question whether respondents acted properly in determining that certain crimes of which petitioner was convicted in the Federal jurisdiction are such as are felonies under the laws of New York State, and pursuant to section 219 of the Correction Law, petitioner must be compelled to serve in State prison the portions remaining of the maximum terms of sentences imposed heretofore by New York State courts. Respondents cross-move for dismissal of the petition for failure to state facts sufficient to justify the institution of an article 78 proceeding and that petitioner’s remedy is solely by way of habeas corpus, that the petitioner does not state facts sufficient to entitle the petitioner to any relief, that the determination is not reviewable and, finally, that no jurisdiction exists for the maintenance of the proceeding in New York County. They contend that the application must be made by habeas corpus, and that it is premature in any event *(People ex rel. Dote*v. *Martin,*294 N. Y. 330; *Matter of Mello*v. *Board of Parole,*282 App. Div. 940 [see order of Special Term, Brisach, J.], N. Y. L. J., July 23, 1953, p. 129, col. 2) and that jurisdiction of the matter does not lie in New York County *(Matter of Hines*v. *State Board of Parole,*267 App. Div. 99; *Matter of Mello*v. *Board of Parole,*283 App. Div. 1028 [see order of Special Term, Corcoran, J.], N. Y. L. J., Feb. 16, 1954, p. 7, col. 8). Petitioner has submitted no points in opposition to those raised by respondents in support of their cross motion. The cross motion is granted upon the ground of lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice to renewal in the proper county, or petitioner may, if he so elects, settle an order for transfer.
**Exhibit32.01**

 

**OfficerCertification**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SPS on Form10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (Form 10-Q), each of the undersignedofficers of SPS certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’sknowledge:

 

(1)                      TheForm 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                       Theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of SPS as of thedates and for the periods expressed in the Form 10-Q.

 
| Date: Oct. 30, 2006                        |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                       |
| /s/ DAVID L. EVES                          |   |
| David L. Eves                              |
| Chief Executive Officer                    |
|                                       |
| /s/ BENJAMIN G.S. FOWKE III                |   |
| Benjamin G.S. Fowke III                    |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SPS andwill be retained by SPS and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Domingo Cruz, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered on February 8, 1989, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of six years to life, is unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, “among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. “Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Ross, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

DR. JEROME CORSI, et al §

§

V. § 1-20-CV-298-LY

§

INFOWARS, LLC, et al. §

ORDER

Before the Court are Defendant Roger Stone’s Motion to Stay Discovery, Quash Plaintiffs’

Deposition Notices, and for Protective Order (Dkt. No. 93), Defendant Free Speech Systems, LLC’s

Opposed Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. No. 94), and Defendant David Jones’ Motion to Stay

Discovery and for Protective Order (Dkt. No. 95). The District Court referred the above motions to

the undersigned forresolution pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), FED.R.CIV.P. 72, andRule 1(c)

of Appendix C of the Local Rules. 

Having considered the motions, the Court hereby GRANTS the motions in part and

QUASHES the depositions set for February 24, 25, and 26 (Dkt. Nos. 93, 94, 95). The Court

ORDERS the parties to appear on Tuesday, March 23, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. for a hearing on the

motions to stay discovery in this case. The Court FURTHER ORDERS that no further discovery

shall take place in this matter until the hearing on March 23, 2021.

SIGNED this 23rd

 day of February, 2021.

_____________________________________

ANDREW W. AUSTIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00298-LY-AWA Document 96 Filed 02/23/21 Page 1 of 2
2

Case 1:20-cv-00298-LY-AWA Document 96 Filed 02/23/21 Page 2 of 2