65938 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

process, including a final financial 

review and management compensation. 

In an interim rule published in the 

Federal Register on July 23, 2010, and 

effective on July 24, 2010 (75 FR 43040, 

Doc. No. AMS–FV–10–0054, FV10–924– 

2 IR), §§ 924.160 and 924.236 were 

suspended. 

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 

Pursuant to requirements set forth in 

the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 

U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural 

Marketing Service (AMS) has 

considered the economic impact of this 

action on small entities. Accordingly, 

AMS has prepared this final regulatory 

flexibility analysis. 

The purpose of the RFA is to fit 

regulatory actions to the scale of 

business subject to such actions in order 

that small businesses will not be unduly 

or disproportionately burdened. 

Marketing orders issued pursuant to the 

Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are 

unique in that they are brought about 

through group action of essentially 

small entities acting on their own 

behalf. 

There are six handlers of WashingtonOregon fresh prunes subject to 

regulation under the order and 

approximately 56 fresh prune producers 

in the regulated area. Small agricultural 

service firms are defined by the Small 

Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 

121.201) as those having annual receipts 

of less than $7,000,000, and small 

agricultural producers are defined as 

those having annual receipts of less than 

$750,000. 

Based on information compiled by 

both the Committee and the National 

Agricultural Statistics Service, the 

average producer price for fresh prunes 

in 2009 was approximately $385 per 

ton. With 4,260 tons of fresh prunes 

shipped from the Washington and 

Oregon production areas in 2009, this 

equates to average producer revenue of 

about $30,000. In addition, AMS Market 

News Service reported that 2009 f.o.b. 

prices ranged from $12.00 to $18.00 per 

30-pound container, thus the entire 

Washington-Oregon fresh prune 

industry handled less than $7,000,000 

worth of prunes last season. In view of 

the foregoing, the majority of 

Washington-Oregon fresh prune 

producers and handlers may be 

classified as small entities. 

The Committee made the 

recommendation to suspend the 

reporting and assessment requirements 

as an adjunct to the recommendation to 

terminate the order. As such, the only 

other alternative would have been to 

continue to assess handlers and to 

require reports, options not seriously 

considered since additional funds are 

not required. 

This action continues in effect the 

action that suspended the reporting and 

assessment obligations imposed on 

handlers. During any period when 

effective, assessments are applied 

uniformly on all handlers and some of 

the costs may be passed on to 

producers. This suspension of the 

reporting and assessment requirements 

reduces the burden on handlers and 

should also reduce the burden on 

producers. 

This rule will not impose any 

additional reporting or recordkeeping 

requirements on either small or large 

prune handlers. As with all Federal 

marketing order programs, reports and 

forms are periodically reviewed to 

reduce information requirements and 

duplication by industry and public 

sector agencies. In addition, USDA has 

not identified any relevant Federal rules 

that duplicate, overlap or conflict with 

this rule. 

The Committee’s meeting was widely 

publicized throughout the WashingtonOregon fresh prune industry and all 

interested persons were invited to 

attend the meeting and participate in 

Committee deliberations. Like all 

Committee meetings, the June 1, 2010, 

meeting was a public meeting and all 

entities, both large and small, were able 

to express their views on this issue. 

Comments on the interim rule were 

required to be received on or before 

September 21, 2010. No comments were 

received. Therefore, for the reasons 

given in the interim rule, we are 

adopting the interim rule as a final rule, 

without change. 

To view the interim rule, go to: 

http://www.regulations.gov/search/ 

Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=

0900006480b1fd84. 

This action also affirms information 

contained in the interim rule concerning 

Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44 

U.S.C. 101). 

After consideration of all relevant 

material presented, it is found that 

finalizing the interim rule, without 

change, as published in the Federal 

Register (75 FR 43039, July 23, 2010) 

will tend to effectuate the declared 

policy of the Act. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 924 

Prunes, Marketing agreements, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

PART 924—FRESH PRUNES GROWN 

IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN 

WASHINGTON AND IN UMATILLA 

COUNTY, OREGON 

■ Accordingly, the interim rule that 

amended 7 CFR part 924 and was 

published at 75 FR 43039 on July 23, 

2010, is adopted as a final rule, without 

change. 

Dated: October 21, 2010. 

David R. Shipman, 

Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27196 Filed 10–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

14 CFR Part 97 

[Docket No. 30750; Amdt. No. 3397] 

Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums 

and Obstacle Departure Procedures; 

Miscellaneous Amendments 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, 

suspends, or revokes Standard 

Instrument Approach Procedures 

(SIAPs) and associated Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle Departure 

Procedures for operations at certain 

airports. These regulatory actions are 

needed because of the adoption of new 

or revised criteria, or because of changes 

occurring in the National Airspace 

System, such as the commissioning of 

new navigational facilities, adding new 

obstacles, or changing air traffic 

requirements. These changes are 

designed to provide safe and efficient 

use of the navigable airspace and to 

promote safe flight operations under 

instrument flight rules at the affected 

airports. 

DATES: This rule is effective October 27, 

2010. The compliance date for each 

SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, 

and ODP is specified in the amendatory 

provisions. 

The incorporation by reference of 

certain publications listed in the 

regulations is approved by the Director 

of the Federal Register as of October 27, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter 

incorporated by reference in the 

amendment is as follows: 

For Examination— 

1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA 

Headquarters Building, 800 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 65939 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; 

2. The FAA Regional Office of the 

region in which the affected airport is 

located; 

3. The National Flight Procedures 

Office, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., 

Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or 

4. The National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, 

or go to: http://www.archives.gov/ 

federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Availability—All SIAPs are available 

online free of charge. Visit nfdc.faa.gov 

to register. Additionally, individual 

SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP 

copies may be obtained from: 

1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA– 

200), FAA Headquarters Building, 800 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; or 

2. The FAA Regional Office of the 

region in which the affected airport is 

located. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Harry J. Hodges, Flight Procedure 

Standards Branch (AFS–420) Flight 

Technologies and Programs Division, 

Flight Standards Service, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Mike 

Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 

South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, 

OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 

25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125) 

telephone: (405) 954–4164. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule 

amends Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by 

amending the referenced SIAPs. The 

complete regulatory description of each 

SIAP is listed on the appropriate FAA 

Form 8260, as modified by the National 

Flight Data Center (FDC)/Permanent 

Notice to Airmen (P–NOTAM), and is 

incorporated by reference in the 

amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 

1 CFR part 51, and § 97.20 of Title 14 

of the Code of Federal Regulations. 

The large number of SIAPs, their 

complex nature, and the need for a 

special format make their verbatim 

publication in the Federal Register 

expensive and impractical. Further, 

airmen do not use the regulatory text of 

the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic 

depiction on charts printed by 

publishers of aeronautical materials. 

Thus, the advantages of incorporation 

by reference are realized and 

publication of the complete description 

of each SIAP contained in FAA form 

documents is unnecessary. This 

amendment provides the affected CFR 

sections and specifies the types of SIAP 

and the corresponding effective dates. 

This amendment also identifies the 

airport and its location, the procedure 

and the amendment number. 

The Rule 

This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is 

effective upon publication of each 

separate SIAP as amended in the 

transmittal. For safety and timeliness of 

change considerations, this amendment 

incorporates only specific changes 

contained for each SIAP as modified by 

FDC/P–NOTAMs. 

The SIAPs, as modified by FDC P– 

NOTAM, and contained in this 

amendment are based on the criteria 

contained in the U.S. Standard for 

Terminal Instrument Procedures 

(TERPS). In developing these changes to 

SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied 

only to specific conditions existing at 

the affected airports. All SIAP 

amendments in this rule have been 

previously issued by the FAA in a FDC 

NOTAM as an emergency action of 

immediate flight safety relating directly 

to published aeronautical charts. The 

circumstances which created the need 

for all these SIAP amendments requires 

making them effective in less than 30 

days. 

Because of the close and immediate 

relationship between these SIAPs and 

safety in air commerce, I find that notice 

and public procedure before adopting 

these SIAPs are impracticable and 

contrary to the public interest and, 

where applicable, that good cause exists 

for making these SIAPs effective in less 

than 30 days. 

Conclusion 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. For the same reason, the 

FAA certifies that this amendment will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97 

Air Traffic Control, Airports, 

Incorporation by reference, and 

Navigation (Air). 

Issued in Washington, DC, on October 15, 

2010. 

John M. Allen, 

Director, Flight Standards Service. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ Accordingly, pursuant to the authority 

delegated to me, Title 14, Code of 

Federal regulations, part 97, 14 CFR part 

97, is amended by amending Standard 

Instrument Approach Procedures, 

effective at 0901 UTC on the dates 

specified, as follows: 

PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT 

APPROACH PROCEDURES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 97 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 

40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 

44719, 44721–44722. 

■ 2. Part 97 is amended to read as 

follows: 

§§ 97.23, 97.25, 97.27, 97.29, 97.31, 97.33, 

and 97.35 [Amended] 

By amending: § 97.23 VOR, VOR/ 

DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME 

or TACAN; § 97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, 

LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; 

§ 97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; § 97.29 ILS, 

ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV; 

§ 97.31 RADAR SIAPs; § 97.33 RNAV 

SIAPs; and § 97.35 COPTER SIAPs, 

Identified as follows: 

Effective Upon Publication 

AIRAC date State City Airport FDC No. FDC date Subject 

18–Nov–10 ... AK Kotzebue ............... Ralph Wien Memorial ............ 0/0475 10/5/10 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 9, Amdt 2. 

18–Nov–10 ... WI Prairie Du Chien .... Prairie Du Chien Muni ........... 0/1058 10/5/10 Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle 

Dp, Amdt 3. 

18–Nov–10 ... VA Manassas .............. Manassas Rgnl/Harry P. 

Davis Field.

0/3905 10/5/10 ILS or LOC Rwy 16L, Amdt 4D. 

18–Nov–10 ... RI North Kingstown .... Quonset State ....................... 0/5262 10/5/10 VOR A, Amdt 5. 

18–Nov–10 ... AL Bay Minette ........... Minette Muni .......................... 0/6129 10/5/10 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 26, Orig-A. 

18–Nov–10 ... AL Bay Minette ........... Minette Muni .......................... 0/6131 10/5/10 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 8, Orig. 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
65940 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

AIRAC date State City Airport FDC No. FDC date Subject 

18–Nov–10 ... AL Huntsville ............... Madison County Executive/ 

Tom Sharp Jr Fld.

0/6169 10/5/10 VOR/DME B, Amdt 6A. 

18–Nov–10 ... AL Huntsville ............... Madison County Executive/ 

Tom Sharp Jr Fld.

0/6175 10/5/10 ILS or LOC/DME Rwy 18, Orig. 

18–Nov–10 ... AL Huntsville ............... Madison County Executvie/ 

Tom Sharp Jr Fld.

0/6184 10/5/10 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 18, Amdt 1. 

18–Nov–10 ... TN Smyrna .................. Smyrna .................................. 0/6782 10/5/10 NDB Rwy 32, Amdt 9. 

18–Nov–10 ... TN Smyrna .................. Smyrna .................................. 0/6785 10/5/10 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 14, Orig. 

18–Nov–10 ... TN Smyrna .................. Smyrna .................................. 0/6786 10/5/10 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 32, Orig. 

18–Nov–10 ... TN Smyrna .................. Smyrna .................................. 0/6787 10/5/10 VOR/DME Rwy 14, Amdt 7. 

18–Nov–10 ... TN Smyrna .................. Smyrna .................................. 0/6788 10/5/10 VOR/DME Rwy 32, Amdt 13. 

18–Nov–10 ... OH Painesville ............. Concord Airpark .................... 0/6793 10/5/10 VOR or GPS A, Orig-A. 

18–Nov–10 ... CA Monterey ............... Monterey Peninsula .............. 0/6914 10/5/10 ILS or LOC Rwy 10R, Amdt 27A. 

18–Nov–10 ... SC Summerville ........... Summerville ........................... 0/7008 10/5/10 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 24, Orig-A. 

18–Nov–10 ... SC Summerville ........... Summerville ........................... 0/7009 10/5/10 NDB Rwy 6, Amdt 1. 

18–Nov–10 ... SC Summerville ........... Summerville ........................... 0/7010 10/5/10 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 6, Orig. 

18–Nov–10 ... ID Idaho Falls ............. Idaho Falls Rgnl .................... 0/7136 10/5/10 RNAV (RNP) Z Rwy 20, Orig. 

18–Nov–10 ... NY White Plains .......... Westchester County .............. 0/7137 10/5/10 VOR/DME A, Amdt 4. 

18–Nov–10 ... MS Indianola ................ Indianola Muni ....................... 0/7258 10/5/10 NDB Rwy 35, Amdt 5. 

18–Nov–10 ... MS Indianola ................ Indianola Muni ....................... 0/7261 10/5/10 NDB Rwy 17, Amdt 5. 

18–Nov–10 ... WI Madison ................. Dane County Rgnl–Truax 

Field.

0/7436 10/5/10 RADAR–1, Amdt 17A. 

18–Nov–10 ... FL Orlando .................. Kissimmee Gateway ............. 0/7453 10/5/10 VOR/DME or GPS A, Orig-B. 

18–Nov–10 ... MN International Falls .. Falls Intl ................................. 0/7456 10/5/10 ILS or LOC/DME Rwy 13, Amdt 

1A. 

18–Nov–10 ... MS Grenada ................ Grenada Muni ....................... 0/7465 10/5/10 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 31, Orig. 

18–Nov–10 ... MS Meridian ................. Key Field ............................... 0/7466 10/5/10 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 19, Orig. 

18–Nov–10 ... TN Springfield ............. Springfield Robertson County 0/7467 10/5/10 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 22, Orig. 

18–Nov–10 ... PA Lancaster ............... Lancaster ............................... 0/7468 10/5/10 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 31, Orig. 

18–Nov–10 ... PA Lancaster ............... Lancaster ............................... 0/7470 10/5/10 VOR/DME Rwy 31, Amdt 4. 

18–Nov–10 ... RI Providence ............ Theodore Francis Green 

State.

0/7473 10/5/10 VOR Rwy 34, Amdt 4D. 

18–Nov–10 ... FL Hollywood .............. North Perry ............................ 0/7474 10/5/10 GPS Rwy 9R, Orig-A. 

18–Nov–10 ... VA Clarksville .............. Lake Country Regional ......... 0/7483 10/5/10 GPS Rwy 4, Orig-A. 

18–Nov–10 ... NY Dunkirk .................. Chautauqua Cnty/Dunkirk ..... 0/7488 10/5/10 GPS Rwy 24, Orig. 

18–Nov–10 ... SC Pageland ............... Pageland ............................... 0/7494 10/5/10 GPS Rwy 23, Orig-A. 

18–Nov–10 ... NY Buffalo ................... Buffalo Niagara Intl ............... 0/7499 10/5/10 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 5, Amdt 1. 

18–Nov–10 ... TX Longview ............... East Texas Rgnl .................... 0/7564 10/5/10 ILS or LOC Rwy 13, Amdt 13. 

18–Nov–10 ... OH Caldwell ................. Noble County ........................ 0/7836 10/5/10 VOR or GPS A, Amdt 1. 

18–Nov–10 ... CA Hawthorne ............. Jack Northrop Field/Hawthorne Muni.0/9210 10/5/10 LOC Rwy 25, Amdt 11. 

[FR Doc. 2010–26948 Filed 10–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 97 

[Docket No. 30749; Amdt. No. 3396] 

Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums 

and Obstacle Departure Procedures; 

Miscellaneous Amendments 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This establishes, amends, 

suspends, or revokes Standard 

Instrument Approach Procedures 

(SIAPs) and associated Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle Departure 

Procedures for operations at certain 

airports. These regulatory actions are 

needed because of the adoption of new 

or revised criteria, or because of changes 

occurring in the National Airspace 

System, such as the commissioning of 

new navigational facilities, adding new 

obstacles, or changing air traffic 

requirements. These changes are 

designed to provide safe and efficient 

use of the navigable airspace and to 

promote safe flight operations under 

instrument flight rules at the affected 

airports. 

DATES: This rule is effective October 27, 

2010. The compliance date for each 

SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, 

and ODP is specified in the amendatory 

provisions. 

The incorporation by reference of 

certain publications listed in the 

regulations is approved by the Director 

of the Federal Register as of October 27, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters 

incorporated by reference in the 

amendment is as follows: 

For Examination— 

1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA 

Headquarters Building, 800 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; 

2. The FAA Regional Office of the 

region in which the affected airport is 

located; 

3. The National Flight Procedures 

Office, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., 

Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or 

4. The National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, 

or go to: http://www.archives.gov/ 

federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Availability—All SIAPs and Takeoff 

Minimums and ODPs are available 

online free of charge. Visit http:// 

www.nfdc.faa.gov to register. 

Additionally, individual SIAP and 

Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may 

be obtained from: 

1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA– 

200), FAA Headquarters Building, 800 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES