alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MARTIN v. MARTIN.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 13, 1952.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 1952.

See also, 313 Kentucky 797, 233 S.W.2d 999.

L. B. Alexander, Paducah, for appellant.

Terrell & Schultzman, Paducah, for appellee.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

Hunter Hart Martin appeals from a judgment which denied his motion for reduction of the amount of the payments he is required to make for the support of his children, under the terms of a divorce judgment.

The children are boys, ages 11 and 13, and the support payments are $40 per week. Martin claims insufficient income and assets to meet the payments.

Martin operates a job printing business in Paducah, and he owns the building and equipment used in the business. He has from six to eight regular employes.

Martin testified that he is losing money in his business, and he introduced in evidence financial statements which purport to show a loss of $1,750 during the period of five months immediately preceding the date of his motion for reduction of the support payments.

An examination of the financial statements discloses a salary item, in addition to the payroll, totalling $5,250 for the five-month period. It is reasonably apparent that this item represents salary drawn by Martin. In addition, the payroll item shown for the last month appears to be excessive, because in order to have a payroll as large as that shown, each of the six employes Martin said he had for that month would have to be paid a monthly wage of $960.

*303Martin claims to have outstanding debts of $4,400, but at the time the divorce judgment was entered he had debts of $5,000, so he has shown no prejudicial change of condition in this regard.

Martin makes some contention that the support payments should be reduced because, since the divorce, his former wife has inherited $100,000 from an aunt. However, it is well settled that the financial condition of the mother may not be considered in determining the amount the father should contribute to the maintenance of his children. Beutel v. Beutel, 300 Ky. 756, 189 S.W.2d 933.

The judgment is affirmed.
LEA-NC• No screen changes were made for EASIE 6.0.• All footers were updated to EASIE 6.0.5/21/2012 EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NC1Part IA Main Menu - Managing User(Man)05/19/20102EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NC“How to Print” Pop-Up05/19/20103EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCList of Part I Steps (Man)05/19/20104EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NC1.1 Part IA Step 1: Type ofApplicant (Man)05/19/20105EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NC1.2 Part IA Step 2: Indian Student Countand Count Period (Man)05/19/20106EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NC1.3 Part IA Step 3: Total StudentCounts (Man)05/19/20107EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NC1.4.1 Part IA Step 4: Review Data(Man)05/19/20108EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NC‘Data Finished?’ Screen (Man)05/19/20109EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCStart Certification Screen (Man)05/19/201010EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCI Certify Screen (Man)05/19/201011EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NC“Help on Certification” Pop-Up05/19/201012EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCCertified Screen (Man)05/19/201013EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCMain Menu After Certification(Man)05/19/201014EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCCreate New Version (Man)05/19/201015EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCNew Version Created Screen (Man)05/19/201016EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCNew Version Created – Main Menu(Man)05/19/201017EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCPart IA Main Menu (GeneralUser)05/19/201018EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCAll Sections Finished Screen without“I Certify” (Gen)05/19/201019EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCMain Menu After Certification(Gen)05/19/201020EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCNot Ready to Certify Screen(Certifying Official User)05/19/201021EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NC“I Certify” Screen (Cert)05/19/201022EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCCertified Screen (Cert)05/19/201023EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCMain Menu After Certification(Cert)05/19/201024EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCMain Menu After Certification(Cert)05/19/201025EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NCContact Support05/19/201026EASIE 6.0 As Is Part IA Screens -LEA_NC
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

TRIVA FIGUEROA, ) 

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 6:20-cv-00181-ADA-JCM

)

COLLECTO, INC. d/b/a EOS CCA, FOSTER )

AND MONROE LLC, and COASTAL )

RECOVERY GROUP LLC, )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AS TO COLLECTO, INC. 

Plaintiff, TRIVA FIGUEROA, (“Plaintiff”), through her attorney, Michael S. Agruss, 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), voluntarily dismisses Defendant, 

COLLECTO, INC. d/b/a EOS CCA, only, without prejudice. Case remains as to Defendants, 

FOSTER and MONROE, LLC, COASTAL RECOVERY GROUP, LLC and COMPLETE 

CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC.

DATED: May 13, 2020 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

By:_/s/ Michael S. Agruss

Michael S. Agruss 

SBN: 6281600

Agruss Law Firm, LLC

4809 N. Ravenswood Ave., Suite 419

Chicago, IL 60640

Tel: 312-224-4695

Fax: 312-253-4451

michael@agrusslawfirm.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 6:20-cv-00181-ADA-JCM Document 9 Filed 05/13/20 Page 1 of 2
2

I certify that on May 13, 2020, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was 

electronically filed with the Court’s CM/ECF system to be sent via the electronic notification 

system to all counsel of record.

By: /s/ Taylor Kosla

Taylor Kosla

Case 6:20-cv-00181-ADA-JCM Document 9 Filed 05/13/20 Page 2 of 2
GO\ . .... {NMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF CO MBIA 

District Department of the Environment 

Office of the Director 

June 3, 2013 

Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region III (Mail Code: 3RAOO) 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

*** 

JY 

Subject: Submittal ofthe Washington DC-MD-VA 1997 Annual PM2.s Redesignation 

Request and Maintenance Plan as a SIP Revision 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

Pursuant to the authority set forth in the District of Columbia Air Pollution Control Act of 1984 

as amended, effective March 15, 1985 (D.C. Law 5-165; D.C. Official Code§§ 8-101.01 et seq. 

(2008 Repl. & 2012 Supp.)), the District Department of the Environment Establishment Act of 

2005, as amended, effective February 15,2006 (D.C. Law 16-51; D.C. Official Code§§ 8-

151.01 et seq. (2008 Repl. & 2012 Supp.)); Mayor's Order 98-44, dated AprillO, 1998, Mayor's 

Order 98-45, dated AprillO, 1998, and Mayor's Order 2006-61, dated June 14, 2006, the District 

of Columbia is hereby requesting approval of the Washington DC-MD-V A Redesignation 

Request and Maintenance Plan for the 1997 annual fine particulate matter (PM2.s) national 

ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). 

The following are attached: 

• One paper copy of the Redesignation Request; 

RECFIVED 

JUN 1 2 2013 

• One paper copy of the Maintenance Plan; Division [J ·el ·r (''APOO) 

• One paper copy of each of Appendices B 1, C 1, D, and E; 11 ,,u .:> 

• One electronic copy of Appendices AI, A2, B2, and C2 (due to the nature ofthe content 

and the size of the files); 

• The Public Hearing Notice; 

• The Hearing Officer's Certification; and 

• One disk containing an electronic version of the entire SIP revision. The electronic 

version includes an exact duplicate of the paper copy of the SIP revision submittal. 

This plan is being submitted because the District of Columbia (District, or DC), the State of 

Maryland (Maryland, or MD), and the Commonwealth of Virginia (Virginia, or VA) request that 

the Washington DC-MD-VA nonattainment area be redesignated to attainment, pursuant to the 

provisions under § 107 of the federal Clean Air Act. The District, Maryland, and Virginia also 

request that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concurrently approve, as 

a revision to the state implementation plan (SIP) for each state, the related§ 175A maintenance 

plan. 

DISTRiCT ~ .. greenforward * 

DEPARTMENT 

OF THE 

ENVIRONMENT 1200 First St. NE, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 200021 tel: 202.535.2600 I web:ddoe.dc.gov 
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (202) 535-

2615, or Ms. Cecily Beall, Associate Director for the Air Quality Division, at (202) 535-2626. 

Enclosure 

cc: Diana Esher, Director, Air Protection Division, EPA Region 3 

Cecily Beall, Associate Director, Air Quality Division, DDOE
Exhibit 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned officers of Standard  Microsystems  Corporation (the Company),  does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended May 31,  2005 of the
Company fully  complies,  in all material  respects,  with the  requirements  of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and  information
contained  in the Form 10-Q  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: July 11, 2005                     By: /s/ Steven J. Bilodeau
                                         --------------------------
                                                (signature)

                                         Steven J. Bilodeau
                                         Chairman of the Board, President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer


                                         By: /s/ Andrew M. Caggia
                                         ------------------------
                                                (signature)

                                         Andrew M. Caggia
                                         Senior Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### MOTE v. STATE.

No. 26755.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 13, 1954.

No attorney on appeal.

Wesley Dice, -State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

■ WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for passing a forged instrument; the punishment having been assessed by the jury at 2 years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts appears in the record and there are no bills of exception.

The sentence - found in the record. provides that appellant be confined in the penitentiary fpr a term of not less than 2 years nor more than 10 years, this notwithstanding the jury assessed a two year term and the court’s judgment correctly sets out such verdict. Also it is observed that the maximum punishment provided by law for the offense of passing a forged instrument is five years! confinement in the penitentiary. Art. 996, P.C.

The judgment and verdict being before us, the sentence will be reformed so as to provide that appellant be confined in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 11

                           SONAT INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                          Three Months
                                                                                         Ended March 31,
                                                                                  1997                       1996
                                                                                      (In Thousands Except
                                                                                       Per-Share Amounts)
         Primary Earnings Per Share(1)

<S>                                                                              <C>                        <C>    
Net Income                                                                       $66,846                    $45,569
                                                                                 =======                    =======


Common Stock and Common Stock Equivalents:

    Weighted Average Number of Shares
       of Common Stock Outstanding                                                86,229                     86,128
    Common Stock Equivalents Applicable
       to Outstanding Stock Options                                                1,670                      1,097
                                                                                 -------                    -------

    Weighted Average Number of Shares
       of Common Stock and Common Stock
       Equivalents Outstanding                                                    87,899                     87,225
                                                                                 =======                    =======



Primary Earnings Per Share                                                       $   .76                    $   .52
                                                                                 =======                    =======

</TABLE>













(1)      This  calculation is submitted in accordance  with  Regulation S-K Item
         601(b)(11)  although  not required by Footnote 2 to Paragraph 14 of APB
         Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%. For this
         reason,  the primary  earnings per share amounts shown for both periods
         do not agree with  primary  earnings  per share shown on the  Condensed
         Consolidated Statements of Income in Part I.
#### SANFORD v. STATE.

No. 26265.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 25, 1953.

W. J. Baldwin,, Beaumont, for appellant.

Dudley Davis, Dist. Atty., Center, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judgq.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, two years.

The sole question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.

Parker Jordan testified that the appellant had, been to his home on several occasions prior to the day in question, and that on said day appellant drove up in his automobile and borrowed some tools in order to fix his brakes. Jordan stated that he and his widowed sister, who was living with him, drove off in a wagon loaded with corn; that appellant was working on his automobile and that he promised to stay there until tjiey got back.

Jordan testified that he drove the wagon to the home of his landlord, emptied the corn, and returned to his home. He stated that upon his return the appellant was gone, the wire netting over one window had been pulled loose, the dresser drawer prized’ open, and the money he had therein was gone.

Several other witnesses testified, but they added no criminative fact pointing to the accused as, the burglar, other than that •he was in the vicinity on the day in question and that no one else was seen thereabouts.

The State, evidently realizing the weákness of its case, asks us to look to the transcript to find that the accused was not arrested until some time after the burglary. This we are not at liberty to do. If the State had evidence of flight, the same would have been very helpful in making out its case, but should have been introduced before the jury in order to warrant our consideration.

The evidence herein may raise a strong suspicion of appellant’s guilt, but we conclude that it does not measure up to the demands of the law of circumstantial evidence.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25887]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel Comparative Medicine.
    Date: October 12, 2000.
    Time: 3:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 
6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Sybil A. Wellstood, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research 
Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7965; 301-435-0814.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 
93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: September 29, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-25887 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy. 

# ACTION:

Subsequent arrangement.

# SUMMARY:

This notice has been issued under the authority of Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The Department is providing notice of a  proposed “subsequent arrangement” under the Agreement for Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Atomic Energy between the United States and Canada and Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between the United States and the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM). 

                        This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 40,168.3kg of U.S.-origin natural uranium, 27,153.8kg of which is in the form of UF6, from the Cameco Corporation, Ontario, Canada to Urenco Almelo, Netherlands. The material, which is now located at Cameco Corp., Port Hope, Ontario, will be transferred to Urenco for toll enrichment. Upon completion of the  toll enrichment, the material will be transferred to the Northern States Power, Minneapolis, MN for use as fuel. The uranium hexafluoride was originally obtained by the Cameco Corp. from  IMC—Agrico Bannockburn, Il pursuant to export license number XSOU8714.                     

In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, we have determined that this subsequent arrangement is not inimical to the common defense and security. 

This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen days after the date of  publication of this notice. 

For the Department of Energy.

 Trisha Dedik,

 Director, International Policy and Analysis for Arms Control and Nonproliferation Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.

[FR Doc. 00-25454 Filed 10-3-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450-01-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SPRINGS INDUSTRIES, INC., FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 27, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                             680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  363,687
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    401,304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               807,822
<PP&E>                                       1,350,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                 815,806
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,425,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          251,822
<BONDS>                                        168,835
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,066
<OTHER-SE>                                     811,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,425,913
<SALES>                                      1,651,176
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,651,176
<CGS>                                        1,348,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,348,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,841
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 81,419
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,682
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,737
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,737
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.62
        

</TABLE>