alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J IMMY W ILLIAMSON , P ARTNER *

R OSS A. S EARS , II, P ARTNER *

C YNDI M OSS R USNAK , P ARTNER
M IKE K ERENSKY , O F C OUNSEL *

W ILLIAM W. D ILLS

, ASSOCIATE
J ESUS C HAPA

, ASSOCIATE
A MY B. A RCHAMBAULT

, A SSOCIATE
C HRISTINA S OILEAU

, A SSOCIATE

* CERTIFIED PERSONAL I NJURY

TRIAL LAW

- T EXAS BOARD OF

LEGAL SPECIALIZATION 

# W ILLIAMSON



# , S EARS


# & R USNAK



# , LLP

A TTORNEYS AT 

### L AW



### M ARCH 

### 31, 2015 JIMMY @ WSRLAWFIRM

. COM

ROSS @ WSRLAWFIRM

. COM

CYNDI @ WSRLAWFIRM

. COM

MIKE @ WSRLAWFIRM

. COM

WILLIAMSONSEARSRUSNAK

. COM

(713) 223

- 3330 (O FFICE ) (855) 972

- 7783 (T OLL F REE ) (713) 223

- 0001 (F AX )

4310 Y OAKUM B LVD

. H OUSTON

, T EXAS 77006



### Via e

- Filing

Supreme Court of Texas Attention: Blake Hawthorne, Clerk

PO Box 12248 Austin, Texas 78711

Re: No. 15

- 0205; In the Supreme Court of Texas; In re David Dow vs. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Dear Mr. Hawthorne,

After reading David Dow’s petition and supporting evidence, the undersigned attorneys respectfully request our names be added to the list of lawyers who join in its request for relief.

As members of the bar, we have a duty to stand against injustice. What the Court of Criminal Appeals has done to David Dow is a personal injustice, and an institutional wrong done to those least able to stand up for themselves, indigent s

. In these economic times, a s ystemic attack on lawyers who work pro bono to ensure that all Americans have equal access to the court system is disturbing.

We agree with Judge Alcala that the decision regarding Mr. Dow is: “unwise, excessive, unjust to victims, and chilling to defendants and other attorneys.” The decision was wrong.

Texas needs David Dow to continue his work representing those who have n owhere else to turn and providing the bar with an example of what it means to be a lawyer

- servant. Mr. Dow is the type of lawyer we should all aspire to be.

We are honored to add our names to support Mr. Dow’s petition, and urge the Supreme

Court to return Mr. Dow to his essential work.

Sincerely,

/s/ Jimmy Williamson Jimmy Williamson

SBN 21624100 /s/Cyndi Moss Rusnak Cyndi Moss Rusnak

SBN 24007964 /s/ Ross A. Sears, II Ross A. Sears, II

SBN 17960011 /s/ Michael Kerensky Michael Kerensky

SBN 11331500

/s/ William Dills

William Dills

SBN 24067421 /s/ Jesus Chapa Jesus Chapa

SBN 24075891 /s/ Amy B. Archambault 

### Amy Archambault

SBN 24055110 /s/ Christina Soileau

Christina Soileau

SBN 24085925

FILED

15-0205
3/31/2015 3:18:58 PM

tex-4714416
SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

### Supreme Court of Texas Attention: Blake Hawthorne, Cle rk March 31, 2015 Page 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5(d) and (e), I certify that I have served this document on all parties of record via electronic service on March 31, 2015.

/s/ Amy B. Archambault Amy B. Archambault
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

KIRK JOHNSTON, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 1:20-CV-497-RP

§

CHAD KROEGER, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the Court is the report and recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge 

Susan Hightower concerning Defendants Chad Kroeger, et al.’s Motion for Attorney Fees, (Dkt. 

74). (R. & R., Dkt. 81). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 1(d) of Appendix C of the Local 

Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Judge Hightower issued 

her report and recommendation on September 14, 2023. (Id.). As of the date of this order, no party

has filed objections to the report and recommendation.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), a party may serve and file specific, written objections to a 

magistrate judge’s proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen days after being served 

with a copy of the report and recommendation and, in doing so, secure de novo review by the 

district court. When no objections are timely filed, a district court can review the magistrate’s report 

and recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note (“When no 

timely objection is filed, the [district] court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the 

face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”).

Because no party has filed timely objections, the Court reviews the report and 

recommendation for clear error. Having done so and finding no clear error, the Court accepts and 

adopts the report and recommendation as its own order.

Case 1:20-cv-00497-RP Document 82 Filed 10/04/23 Page 1 of 2
2

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the Report and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. 81), is ADOPTED. Defendants’ motion for attorney fees is 

DENIED.

Defendants’ Bill of Costs, (Dkt. 75), is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to 

enter the Bill of Costs against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants. The Court will enter an amended 

final judgment separately to award costs to Defendants.

SIGNED on October 4, 2023.

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00497-RP Document 82 Filed 10/04/23 Page 2 of 2
# RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

 Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564-7167 OR www.epa.gov/​oeca/​ofa Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed January 24, 2000 Through January 28, 2000 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 000020, Final EIS, COE, FL, Lake Okeechobee Regulation Schedule Study, To Maintain or Improve Existing Water Storage, St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee River Estuaries, FL , Due: March 6, 2000, Contact: Elmar Kurzbach (904) 232-2325.

EIS No. 000021, Final EIS, USN, NV, Fallon Naval Air Station (NAS), Proposal for the Fallon Range Complex Requirements, Federal and Private Lands, Churchill, Eureka, Lander, Mineral, Nye and Washoe Counties, NV, Due: March 6, 2000, Contact: Terri Knutson (775) 885-6156.

EIS No. 000022, Final EIS, DOE, NM, The Conveyance and Transfer of Certain Land Tracts Administered by the US DOE and Located at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos and Santa Fe Counties, NM, Due: March 6, 2000, Contact: Elizabeth Withers (505) 667-8690.

EIS No. 000023, Draft EIS, SFW, CA, San Diequito Wetland Restoration Project, Implementation, Comprehensive Restoration Plan, COE Section 404 Permit, Cities of Del Mar and San Diego, San Diego County, CA, Due: March 20, 2000, Contact: Jack Fancher (760) 431-9440.

EIS No. 000024, Draft EIS, FHW, TX, TX-130 Construction, I-35 of Georgetown to I-10 near Seguin, Funding, COE Section 404 Permit, Williamson, Travis, Caldwell, Guadalupe Counties, TX, Due: March 20, 2000, Contact: Walter Waidelich (512) 916-5988.

EIS No. 000025, Final EIS, FHW, AR, MS, AR, Great River Bridge, Construction, US 65 in Arkansas to MS-8 in Mississippi, Funding, COE Section 404 Permit and US Coast Guard Bridge Permit, Desha and Arkansas Counties, AR and Bolivar County, MS, Due: March 6, 2000, Contact: Elizabeth A. Romero (504) 324-5625.

EIS No. 000026, Final EIS, UAF, LA, TX, NM, Realistic Bomber Training Initiative, Improve the B-52 and B-1 Aircrews Mission Training and Maximize Combat Training Time, Barksdale Air Force Base, LA, NM and TX, Due: March 6, 2000, Contact: Brenda Cook (757) 764-9339.

EIS No. 000027, Final EIS, FRC, FL, MS, Florida Gas Transmission Phase IV Expansion Project (Docket No. CP99-94-000), To Deliver Natural Gas to Electric Generator, FL and MS, Due: March 6, 2000, Contact: Paul McKee (202) 208-1088.

Dated: February 1, 2000.

B. Katherine Biggs,

Associate Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 00-2595 Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

MASTEROBJECTS, INC.

vs.

FACEBOOK, INC.

§

§ CIVIL NO:

§ WA:20-CV-00087-ADA

§

§

ORDER RESETTING DISCOVERY 

HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Zoom DISCOVERY HEARING in the above 

entitled and numbered case, which was originally set for Wednesday, April 7, 2021 

at 03:00 PM is now rescheduled for Wednesday, April 21, 2021 at 04:00 PM.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of April, 2021.

Case 6:20-cv-00087-ADA Document 79 Filed 04/07/21 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5409 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5409

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain wire containing 
   99.9 percent or more by weight of gold and with dopants added to 
                  control wirebonding characteristics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

  Mr. Honda introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain wire containing 
   99.9 percent or more by weight of gold and with dopants added to 
                  control wirebonding characteristics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WIRE CONTAINING 99.9 PERCENT OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF 
              GOLD AND WITH DOPANTS ADDED TO CONTROL WIREBONDING 
              CHARACTERISTICS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.7108 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to wire containing 99.9 percent 
or more by weight of gold and with dopants added to control wirebonding 
characteristics, having a diameter of 0.05 mm or less, for use in the 
manufacture of diodes, transistors or similar semiconductor devices or 
electronic integrated circuits) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5443 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Ethoxyquin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Ethoxyquin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHOXYQUIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.32 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Ethoxyquin) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00454-ADA 

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00456-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00457-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00458-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00460-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00461-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00462-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00463-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00464-ADA

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-CV-00465-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY BARRY K. SHELTON

Defendant Microsoft Corporation respectfully moves for Barry K. Shelton of Shelton 

Coburn LLP to be permitted to withdraw as counsel for Defendant in this case. The withdrawal of 

Mr. Shelton will not delay this proceeding and will not prejudice any party. Defendant will 

continue to be represented by Sidley Austin LLP and Gillam & Smith, L.L.P. Counsel for 

Defendant has conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, who indicated Plaintiff is not opposed to the 

granting of this motion.

Defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant this Motion and enter an order 

permitting Mr. Shelton to withdraw from this action as counsel for Defendant. Defendant further 

requests that the Court and all parties remove Mr. Shelton from all service lists, including ECF 

service lists, and cease to serve him with orders, motions, discovery, and all other documents 

subject to service and/or notice in this proceeding.

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 90 Filed 01/03/22 Page 1 of 3
2

Dated: January 2, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Texas State Bar No. 24055029

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com

SHELTON COBURN LLP

311 RR 620, Suite 205

Austin, TX 78734-4775 

Telephone: 512.263.2165

Facsimile: 512.263.2166 

Attorney for Defendant Microsoft Corporation

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 90 Filed 01/03/22 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document is being served via the Court’s CM/ECF system on 

January 2, 2022 on all counsel of record per Local Rule CV-5(a).

/s/ Barry K. Shelton

Barry K. Shelton

Case 6:20-cv-00463-ADA Document 90 Filed 01/03/22 Page 3 of 3
#### Ex parte SEYMOUR.

No. 24948.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 23, 1950.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

This is an original application for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus by relator, alleging that he is unlawfully held as an inmate of the state prison in that he was committed thereto for life as an habitual offender; that while serving such term, Governor Stevenson granted to him a conditional pardon and turned him over to a U. S. Marshal “conditioned that he be released to U. S. Marshall; conditioned upon his conducting himself in all things in an exemplary manner,” etc.; that he was taken by such marshal to Louisiana and there convicted finally and given a term of five years in some institution; that he was aft-erwards released from such institution and finally found in Houston, Texas; that the Governor revoked such conditional pardon and he is now in the state prison.

It is not shown what was contained in such revocation of the pardon, but it is shown in the pardon that the same was granted on condition of good behavior and was revokable upon any misconduct or violation of the law, or if the pardoned person failed in any way to comply with the terms thereof; or for any other reason that the Governor may deem sufficient, including any facts not known to the Governor at the time of the clemency, this conditional pardon should be and is subject to revocation at the Governor’s discretion, with or .without hearing as the Governor may determine ; and upon revocation by the Govern- or of this conditional pardon, the same shall become and be null and void and of no force and effect, and the said Eddie Sey*449mour shall be returned to serve his original sentence.

We have repeatedly held that a conditional pardon is a contract between the pardoned person and the State; that its acceptance is an agreement to be bound by the terms thereof, and same can be limited by the terms of the clemency. See Ex parte Davenport, 110 Tex.Cr.R. 326, 7 S.W.2d 589, 60 A.L.R. 1403, for a full discussion thereof; also 20 Ruling Case Law, p. 573, sec. 61; and Ex parte Redwine, 91 Tex.Cr.R. 83, 236 S.W. 96; Redwine v. State of Texas, 261 U.S. 608, 43 S.Ct. 433, 67 L.Ed. 825.

If the relator accepted this conditional pardon, he is bound thereby; if he did not accept such conditional pardon, then the same is no contract and would be ineffective. Therefore, we do not think such clemency would entitle him to his rer lease in view of the revocation thereof.

The writ will be refused.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

17 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of MidCarolina Financial Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
Randolph J. Cary, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Christopher B. Redcay, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|Randolph J. Cary, Jr.  
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 23, 2004         



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|Christopher B. Redcay  
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 23, 2004         



This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



96
Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water

April 2, 2013

Memorandum

Subject: Basis for Expedited Approval of Fast Phage for the determination of somatic and male specific 

coliphages under the Ground Water Rule

From: James L. Sinclair, Microbiologist

To: The Record

The Ground Water Rule (GWR) was proposed in May 2000 (67 FR 65888) and promulgated in 2006 (71 

FR 65574). One of the methods approved for use under the GWR for detection of coliphages is EPA 

Method 1601. 

After the GWR was promulgated an additional method for coliphage detection under the GWR was 

evaluated through the Alternative Test Procedures (ATP) program. This method was Fast Phage which 

was developed by Charm Sciences. The ATP evaluation compared Fast Phage to EPA Method 1601 and 

to performance criteria developed when EPA Method 1601 was validated. This evaluation determined 

that Fast Phage gave acceptable results for detection of both male specific and somatic coliphages. 

Since Fast Phage has been found to give equivalent results to EPA Method 1601, which is approved 

under the GWR, Fast Phage would give equivalent results for male specific and somatic coliphage 

determination under the GWR.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Legends Financial Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas E. Bates, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                            /s/ Thomas E. Bates, Jr.
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Thomas E. Bates, Jr.
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           Legends Financial Holdings, Inc.
                                           March 18, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.1


                 INTERSTAR SECURITISATION MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED
                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew Twyford, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed  this annual  report on Form 20-F,  and all reports on Form
     6-K  containing  distribution  or  servicing  reports  filed in  respect of
     periods  included in the year covered by this annual  report,  of Interstar
     Millennium Series 2003-1G Trust;

2.   Based on my knowledge,  the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
     does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
     material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in light of the
     circumstances  under which such  statements were made, not misleading as of
     the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge,  the distribution or servicing  information required
     to be  provided  to the  trustee  by the  servicer  under the  pooling  and
     servicing,  or  similar,  agreements,  for  inclusion  in these  reports is
     included in these reports;

4.   I am  responsible  for reviewing the  activities  performed by the servicer
     under the pooling and servicing,  or similar,  agreements and based upon my
     knowledge and the annual  compliance  review required under that agreement,
     and except as  disclosed in the reports,  the  servicer has  fulfilled  its
     obligations under that agreement; and

5.   The  reports  disclose  all  significant   deficiencies   relating  to  the
     servicer's  compliance with the minimum servicing  standards based upon the
     report provided by an independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting a
     review in  compliance  with the  Uniform  Single  Attestation  Program  for
     Mortgage  Bankers or similar  procedure,  as set forth in the  pooling  and
     servicing, or similar, agreements, that is included in these reports.




 /S/ ANDREW TWYFORD
-----------------------
Name:    Andrew Twyford
Title:   Chief Financial Officer, Interstar Securitisation Management Limited
Date:    January 12, 2004