alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1


                   INTERSTAR SECURITISATION MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

The undersigned  officer of Interstar  Securitisation  Management Pty Limited, a
company  organized  under  the  laws  of  Victoria,  Australia  ("ISM"),  hereby
certifies on behalf of ISM and on his own behalf for  purposes of the  Interstar
Millennium  Series 2003-1G Trust Class A2 and B1 Mortgage  Backed  Floating Rate
Notes (the "Notes"), as follows:

1.   I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Officer of ISM,

2.   I am duly  authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's  Certificate on
     behalf of ISM; and

3.   To the best of my  knowledge,  the Issuer  Trustee  has  complied  with all
     conditions and covenants under the Transaction Documents, for the Interstar
     Millennium Series 2003-1G issue of Notes for the period between 27 February
     2004 and the end of the Manager's fiscal year on June 30, 2003. Capitalized
     terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings  assigned to such
     terms in the Note  Trust  Deed  related  to the  above-referenced  issue of
     Notes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of January 12, 2004.



 /S/ SAM KYRIACOU
----------------------------
Name:    Sam Kyriacou
Title:   Director, Interstar Securitisation
         Management Pty
Case 1:20-cr-00122-RP Document 23 Filed 07/15/20 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|New Mexico Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in New Mexico (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|New Mexico Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in New Mexico (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | -------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 57,890  | 58,861 | 60,762 | 62,130 | 61,771 | 64,714 | 82,974 | 106,638
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 116,909 | 119,909 | 138,520 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Santos, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J., at plea and sentence), rendered on June 17, 1988, which convicted defendant, upon *278his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Additionally, we have reviewed the points raised in defendant’s *pro se*supplemental brief and find that these issues are also frivolous. Specifically, as the record clearly indicates that defendant entered a knowing and voluntary plea aided by counsel at all stages of the proceedings, there is no merit to defendant’s *pro se*allegations that he was coerced into entering the plea and was denied effective assistance of counsel.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that court and by submitting such application to the clerk of that court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

***Certificationpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

***(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)***

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of American States Water Company andGolden State Water Company (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I Robert J. Sprowls, Chief Executive Officerof the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| /s/ ROBERT J. SPROWLS                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert J. Sprowls                      |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                                   |
| Date: August 7, 2009              |

 

----
Case 6:20-cv-00366-ADA Document 34-10 Filed 08/31/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 6:20-cv-00366-ADA Document 34-10 Filed 08/31/20 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit32.1**

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. § 1350)**

In connection withthe quarterly report of Southwest Water Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Mark A. Swatek, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that:

1)              to my knowledge, theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)              the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: August 9, 2007 |   | /s/ MARK A. SWATEK      |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                  |   | Mark A. Swatek          |
|                  |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6073

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ASHANTI RHAN HENRY, a/k/a A-1,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:12-cr-00024-JPJ-RSB-1)

Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ashanti Rhan Henry, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Mary Kathleen Carnell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ashanti Rhan Henry appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Henry, No. 1:12-cr-00024-JPJ-RSB-1 (W.D. Va. Dec. 15, 

2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JACK MILLER, ANNABEL CAMPBELL, 

MATTHEW PESINA, LISA PESINA, M.P., a minor, 

and J.G., a minor,

Plaintiffs, Case No.: 5:20-cv-642-JKP

v.

JOSEPH SALVAGGIO; JIM WELLS; OFFICER 

ANDERSON, OFFICER SAUCEDO; OFFICER J. 

VASQUEZ; OFFICER BROOKS; OFFICER KING; 

OFFICER MUNOZ; OFFICER RIVERA; STATE 

POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE; CITY OF KIRBY 

and CITY OF LEON VALLEY, 

Defendants.

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COME NOW Attorneys Brandon J. Grable and Austin M. Reyna of Grable Grimshaw 

Mora PLLC, 1603 Babcock Rd, Ste 280, San Antonio, TX 78229 who are admitted to practice in 

the US District Court Western District of Texas, and file this entry of appearance as counsel for 

Plaintiffs Jack Miller, Annabel Campbell, Matthew Pesina, Lisa Pesina, M.P., a Minor, and J.G., 

a Minor, and hereby advise the Court of their representation of the above-named Plaintiffs, and 

request notice of all future filings, settings, correspondence, and communication from the Court 

and other parties to the undersigned in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Case 5:20-cv-00642-JKP Document 26 Filed 05/20/21 Page 1 of 2
______________________________________________________________________________

Case No: 5:20-cv-642-JKP Notice of Entry of Appearance of Counsel Page 2 of 2

Respectfully Submitted,

GRABLE GRIMSHAW MORA PLLC

____________________________

BRANDON J. GRABLE

Texas State Bar No. 24086983

brandon@ggm.law 

AUSTIN M. REYNA

Texas State Bar No. 24118645

austin@ggm.law

1603 Babcock Road, Suite 280

San Antonio, Texas 78229

Telephone: (210) 963-5297

Facsimile: (210) 641-3332

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby affirm that on this 20th day of May 2021, that the foregoing document was

filed with the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system, and that a copy of said document 

was served upon all parties of record, via electronic service.

______________________________

Brandon J. Grable

Case 5:20-cv-00642-JKP Document 26 Filed 05/20/21 Page 2 of 2
STEPHANIE HUDNALL

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3352

________ _________________/

Opinion filed February 6, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

.

Stephanie Hudnall, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, C.J., WOLF and B.L. THOMAS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
1

Mears, Gilbert

From: ME N JOE <he_n_eye@yahoo.com>

Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 8:51 AM

To: Lueckenhoff, Dominique; Schulingkamp, Cristina; Group R3Public; EPA; EPA; EPA; EPA; 

EPA; EPA; eyesondrilling; Hydraulic Fracturing; EPA.; Dewey, Amy; Briskin, Jeanne; EPA 

EPA; Foster, Rebecca; dbubbenmoy@state.pa.us; R3 RA; EPA.Abraham Ferdas; Arnold, 

David; Pomponio, John; Capacasa, Jon; Libertz, Catherine; Mulkey, Marcia; 

Schulingkamp, Cristina; Garing, Ken; Ripp, Thomas; eyesondrilling; Hoover, Michelle; 

Wisniewski, Patti-Kay; Rizzo, George; Bennett, Andrea; Meadows, Anthony; saxe, jennie; 

Pine, Jacqueline; Khaled, Ghassan; Bennett, Andrea; EPA.kanetsky.charles@epa.gov; 

Tymchenko, Nick; Schmitt, Ellen; Johnson, WandaF; Dean, Jill; epa.Gustafson Staci; 

DEP.LORI.MCNABB; DEP.Sunday Kevin; DEP.Chambers Laura M.; Wisniewski, Patti-Kay; 

Mears, Gilbert; lgmarcucci@environmentalintegrity.org

Subject: Tell the US EPA to Close the TRI (Toxic Release Inventory) Loophole for the Oil and Gas 

Industry; Email Your Message Today

Attachments: TRI_Fact_Sheet.pdf

Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

please pass this on to everyone. here are the addresses for some 

of the EPA AND DEP . TO SEND YOUR MESSAGE JUST HIT 

REPLY TO ALL AND SEND YOUR MESSAGE ON.... THANK 

YOU 

TRI (Toxic Release Inventory) Action Alert: 

We need your help!! Please send an email to the US EPA urging them to "Close the TRI Loophole that the oil and 

gas industry currently enjoys". 

We all deserve to know exactly what these operations are releasing into our air, water and onto our land. Our goal is to 

guarantee the publics right to know. 

Please let the US EPA know how important TRI reporting will be to you and your community: 

 

Mr. Gilbert Mears

Docket #: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281 (must be included on all correspondence)

Mears.gilbert@epa.gov

Toxics Release Inventory Program Division 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

 

Please take a moment to review the attached brief fact sheet to learn more and to see how you can help. 

And, please share this message far and wide. It is important for the US EPA to hear from folks throughout the 

United States.

 

Thanks, in advance, for supporting this important call for accountability. 

 

 
2

 

Lisa Graves Marcucci 

Environmental Integrity Project 

PA Coordinator, Community Outreach 

lgmarcucci@environmentalintegrity.org

412-653-4328 (Direct) 

412-897-0569 (Cell)
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Aron Lapidus, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

July 2, 1957.

*J ohm, J. O’Grady, Jr., and Joseph, Feinstein*for Eleanor Shaw, petitioner.

*Jack Gross*and *Max Berey*for Sylvia Wolfson, respondent.

Joseph A. Cox, S.

Application is made to compel an accounting in the estate of tMs intestate who died in 1929. Letters of administration were granted on June 7, 1929 to the decedent’s mother-in-law and his brother-in-law. The administratrix died in 1932 and letters testamentary under her will were issued in *40the same year. The other administrator died on August 10, 1947 and letters testamentary in his estate were granted on September 8,1947. This application is directed to the executrix so appointed in 1947.

The petitioner herein, the daughter of the decedent, was an infant at the time of his death and distribution from the estate was made to her general guardian during her infancy. The petitioner attained her majority in July, 1939 and in 1944 she executed a general release to the surety on the administrators’bond. There is some indication that a release also was given to the administrators but this has not been proved.

It is safe to assume that the representative of the estate of the administratrix who died in 1932 has not been made a respondent in this proceeding for the obvious reason that the Statute of Limitations would be a defense to the petition *(Matter of Rogers,*153 N. Y. 316; *Matter of McDonough,*279 App. Div. 362). The Statute of Limitations is not a defense to the respondent herein inasmuch as this application was brought shortly within the expiration of the 10-year period following the grant of letters to the respondent. However, it is beyond contradiction that the institution of this proceeding 27 years after the decedent’s death, 17 years after the petitioner attained her majority and 12 years following the release of the surety is an example of gross laches and to compel an accounting by the representative of the estate of a deceased administrator under these facts would be an injustice (4 Warren’s Heaton on Surrogates’ Courts, § 353, par. 3; *Matter of De Angelis,*286 App. Div. 1032).

The application is denied. Submit order on notice.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6906

RITCHIE CORDELL HOPE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-97-646-3-MU) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 20, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ritchie Cordell Hope, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ritchie Cordell Hope seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hope v. North Carolina , No. CA-97-646-3-MU (W.D.N.C. June 4, 1998); see also Brown v. Angelone , 150 F.3d 370 (4th Cir. 1998). We deny Hope’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                       AGREEMENT DATED AS OF MAY 23, 2002


                    BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-D


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. (the
"Servicer"), the Servicer in connection with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2002-D, do hereby certify that (i) a review of the activities of the
Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of its performance under this
Agreement (the "Agreement") has been made under my supervision, (ii) to the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled in all
material aspects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                       BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                       By:
                                          ------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President


Inv D37
**Exhibit 10.31**

**AMENDMENT TO THE**

**ROTECH HEALTHCARE INC. EMPLOYEES PLAN**

Amendment Number 2 to the January 1, 2003 Restatement 

WHEREAS, Rotech Healthcare Inc. (the “Company”) established the Rotech Healthcare Inc. Employees Plan (formerly known as the Rotech Medical Corporation Employees Plan) (the “Plan”), effectiveMarch 26, 2002; and 

WHEREAS, the Plan was last amended and restated, in its entirety, effective January 1, 2003; and 

WHEREAS, Section 9.01 of the Plan provides that the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may amend the Plan at any time andfrom time to time; and 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to provide for a two year eligibility period. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Board hereby amends the Plan as follows: 

FIRST: Effective January 1, 2008, a new section 1.42 is added to the Plan to read as follows: 

1.42 Year of Service – A one-year period of employment of an Employee with an Employer or Affiliated Entity, the computation of which shall commence with the Employee’s Employment Commencement Date andterminate with the Employee’s Separation from Service. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, service in the Armed Forces of the United States during the period the Employer is required to give reemployment rights by law shall be countedtowards Years of Service, if an Employee returns to work with the Employer or Affiliated Entity immediately after such termination of service. 

Notwithstanding the forgoing, Years of Service credited to a Member prior to the incurrence of a One-Year Break in Service shall be disregarded for all Plan purposes until the Member completes a Year of Servicefollowing the occurrence of the most recent One-Year Break in Service. 

SECOND, a new paragraph is added to the endof Section 2.01 to read as follows: 

Effective January 1, 2008, each Eligible Employee who is hired on or afterJanuary 1, 2008 shall become a Member on the Entry Date that coincides with, or next follows, the completion of two (2) consecutive Years of Service. 

THIRD: Except as herein provided, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect without furthermodification. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has caused this Amendment Number 2 tobe executed this 29th day of June, 2007. 

 
**ROTECH HEALTHCARE INC.**By:
EXHIBIT 31.A
CERTIFICATION
I, James C. Yardley, certify that:
1. I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern NaturalGas Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this Report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on suchevaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 11, 2005         /s/ James C. Yardley     James C. Yardley