alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael Stanford, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 73742.)

In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims (McCabe, J.), entered April 24, 1989, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the claim.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

This claim arose from an automobile accident occurring on New York State Highway Route 208, in Orange County. On August 27, 1984, while traveling southbound on Route 208, the claimant was unable to negotiate a sharp left-hand curve. His vehicle struck a guardrail on the right-hand side of the roadway, crossed over both the southbound and northbound lanes and struck a tree beyond the shoulder of the northbound lane. As he entered the curve, the claimant was traveling at a high rate of speed. The claimant’s theory of recovery at trial was that the defendant had negligently permitted foliage to obscure a two-part warning sign consisting of an arrow curv*382ing left and beneath it, a 35-mile-per-hour speed-reduction warning. This sign was located approximately 400 feet before the curve.

It is well established that the State is not the insurer of the safety of its roads and no liability will attach unless the ascribed negligence of the State in maintaining its roads in a reasonable condition is a proximate cause of the accident *(see, Hearn v State of New York,*157 AD2d 883, 885). Here, the record established that the southbound lane of Route 208 was straight for approximately one-half mile leading into the curve where the accident occurred and that an arrow sign pointing left was situated at the beginning of the curve and was clearly visible from a substantial distance. A motorist exercising due care would have observed the arrow sign as well as the curving guardrail and telephone poles, making him aware of the contours of the roadway. An advisory sign blocked by foliage is equivalent to the absence of a warning sign. Here, however, the visible physical conditions and the unobstructed curve sign gave the claimant adequate warning that it was necessary for him to reduce his speed as he prepared to enter the curve *(cf., Koester v State of New York,*90 AD2d 357). The court properly determined that the alleged negligence of the State in permitting the warning sign to become obscured was not a proximate cause of the accident and that the only negligence shown to have caused or contributed to the accident was that of the claimant in failing to operate his vehicle with due care *(see, Lyle v State of New York,*44 AD2d 239).

In view of the court’s findings, which we conclude were supported by the weight of the evidence, we need not address the claimant’s remaining contentions that he was improperly precluded by certain evidentiary rulings from establishing that the defendant had negligently permitted the warning sign to become obscured. However, were we to reach the merits of these contentions, we would find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18
United States Code

The
undersigned, being the Principal Executive Officer of Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. ("Enbridge Management"), hereby certifies that the Enbridge Management Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in such
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Enbridge Management.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Enbridge Management and will be retained by Enbridge Management and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:
February 25, 2005

|/s/DAN C. TUTCHERDan C. Tutcher
President and Principal Executive Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
KPMG

717 North Harwood Street

Suite 3100

Dallas, TX 75201 6585

Independent Accountants' Report

 

The Board of Directors

ORIX Capital Markets, LLC

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management Assertion, that  ORIX Capital Markets, LLC (the Company) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in                the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) Uniform Single Attestation Program for      Mortgage Bankers, except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.I., which the MBA has interpreted    as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. Management is responsible for ORIX Capital Markets, LLC's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about    the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American   Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence   about ORIX Capital Markets, LLC's compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above     and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that      our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on ORIX Capital Markets, LLC's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that ORIX Capital Markets, LLC complied with the     aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly    stated, in all material respects.

KPMG LLP

January 24, 2003
### 539

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIdl** 

M2norable Frank 3. Euinn, **ExeO&-iVb %OZ?etWy**  ‘fsxar State Park8 Board betin 11, Tel*8

Re: Proper 

### die&ftion‘~t pro-

.,.GWI rrom sale **‘ bf**  

## s\ata ,..I’ p.roPWtY. ‘\J 70 have 

### your letter’ rrrraiwhioh we quote: Y?:noloaed 

### rind a **OOIXD~bt&~i~ “Or**  **correspood** enoe between Xon. ,iiM*er A.’ Saksf; Chairman OS the %erd of Contro$‘--ana this 3apartItent regarding the sale of so- LQfighoru oalvee end whether or not the proosdds,cher~rom oould’~be/lsod to pur

### ohaae a thoreu&red to0ghor.p bull:

-. “Our **pro&em'Jg** thid‘ j l&s herd Or **Long** horns wse. donatd ti..,tha,;Teus State **Parka Board,**  **an a&enoy**  **of** th titbor mxaa. ?a reoogaizo

. thm fact. **t&t** the ra,le ofB’~oelves should **bo** 

### handled by the State 306~Yof Control, but would it not be permlaa~ble to depoeit the 

### proobcda to the oredlt ‘or 0~. 3poolsl **Park** Pun3 rather than to ths,~Genoral iUnd i purohaslng the bull whloh we deal&e 

### 12o=.the,~peoial Pfirk 

### Fund?

. . .-* , *It the money receive4 **from** the sala of the oalves is-a&posited in the General Fund, it till be no bbnafit aoorulng to the TeXer State Parks 3oard, and we rill aul’fer the loss of whatb~er money it la neoeear.ry to pay to **sooure** 

### a sood bull. Y’s woilll thank you to advise ~8 if there Is’ any’way possible to use the money obtained fr3= the sale ot the oalves for the purchase of n bull.

. . .II.:onorable Frank 9. quiml, Amongothers la the oorreapondenor 111s enolossd 1s n latter a;tdrbssed to you by Chairman Baker ln whloh he ed- -~lses that ii the oalves are sold bT 

### the Board of ContrcQ, 

### mthe money must be deposited to the orsdlt of the Qeneral Rsrenue hnd or the State.*

3s agree with Judge Baker. 

### Article 666, on thl8 ?olnt, 1s too olear and unequlrooal to admit of w other’oonStruotlon. In **pleln term**  **10** prorldes that when the property or a state agsoy is sold by the Board of Control “thr ammy 

### I'roa the mle or auah property
.. . shall bo deposited lo the -tats 

### Trsaruryto the oredlt of tho General Revenue 

### Fund.* Very 

### truly youre, ATTORNST

UMJBRAL

O? TEXAS



### APPROVE1 **OPINION**

**c** 

### COYYIlzr0I %2%9
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Standard Register Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 4, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph P. Morgan, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, and I, Robert M. Ginnan, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 2, 2010   /S/ JOSEPH P. MORGAN, JR. Joseph P. Morgan, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer   /S/ ROBERT M. GINNAN Robert M. Ginnan Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 128A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2547 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 128A |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 49ό έτος1 Ιουνίου 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2547

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 128A

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

49ό έτος1 Ιουνίου 2006

---

| Ανακοίνωση αριθ | Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Πληροφορίες |
| | CEPOL |
| 2006/C 128A/1 | Ανακοίνωση πρόσληψης | 1 |

Ανακοίνωση αριθ

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

III   Πληροφορίες

CEPOL

2006/C 128A/1

Ανακοίνωση πρόσληψης

1

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

III Πληροφορίες

CEPOL

| 1.6.2006 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | CA 128/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2006

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

CA 128/1

---

ΑΝΑΚΟΊΝΩΣΗ ΠΡΌΣΛΗΨΗΣ

(2006/C 128 Α/01)

Ζητείται άτομο με ευρεία θεωρητική μόρφωση και επαγγελματική εξάσκηση, το οποίο να έχει εμπειρία σαν ηγετικό στέλεχος και γνώσεις στον εκπαιδευτικό και επιμορφωτικό τομέα, για να αναλάβει τη θέση του προϊσταμένου της Γραμματείας της Ευρωπαϊκής Αστυνομικής Ακαδημίας (CEPOL) στο Bramshill, Hampshire, Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο

ΔΙΕΥΘΥΝΤΗΣ

Η CEPOL αποτελεί θεσμικό όργανο των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων, όπου εκπαιδεύονται ανώτεροι αστυνομικοί αξιωματούχοι (Senior Police Officers) από την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση. Επικεφαλής της Γραμματείας, που ενισχύει την Ακαδημία σε θέματα εκπαιδευτικά, διοικητικά, οικονομικά και οργανωτικά/διοικητικής μέριμνας, είναι ένας διευθυντής. Το προσωπικό της Γραμματείας περιλαμβάνει 22 συνεργάτες.

Ο φορέας του διευθυντικού αξιώματος είναι υπεύθυνος για την υποστήριξη και συμβουλευτική συμπαράσταση του προέδρου, των μελών του διοικητικού συμβουλίου και των επιτροπών. Αυτός/αυτή επιβλέπει την προετοιμασία και κατάρτιση του ετήσιου προγράμματος, του ετήσιου οικονομικού προϋπολογισμού και της ετήσιας έκθεσης. Είναι αρμόδιος/αρμόδια για τις διαπραγματεύσεις που αποσκοπούν στη σύναψη των συμφωνιών συνεργασίας και αντιπροσωπεύει την Ευρωπαϊκή Αστυνομική Ακαδημία (CEPOL) στις επιτροπές της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης για αστυνομικά και εκπαιδευτικά θέματα.

Από τη θέση σε ισχύ των νέων κανονισμών της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης περί προσωπικού πρέπει οι υποψήφιοι να είναι, μεταξύ άλλων, υπήκοοι κράτους μέλους της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και να έχουν ευρύτατες γνώσεις μιας από τις γλώσσες των Κοινοτήτων και επαρκείς γνώσεις μιας δεύτερης κοινοτικής γλώσσας. Επίσης πρέπει οι επιτυχόντες υποψήφιοι να υποστούν τοπικό έλεγχο ασφαλείας.

Περισσότερες πληροφορίες και τα έντυπα υποβολής υποψηφιότητας μπορείτε να βρείτε στην ιστοσελίδα της CEPOL www.cepol.net. Ενδεχόμενα ερωτήματα παρακαλούμε να τα απευθύνετε μόνο μέσω ηλεκτρονικού ταχυδρομείου στη διεύθυνση: janos.fehervary@bmi.gv.at

| CEPOL SECRETARIAT |
| --- |
| CEPOL House, Bramshill, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 0JW, United Kingdom |
| Τηλ.: (44-1256) 60 26 68, Φαξ: (44-1256) 60 29 96 |
| Ιστοσελίδα: www.cepol.net |

CEPOL SECRETARIAT

CEPOL House, Bramshill, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 0JW, United Kingdom

Τηλ.: (44-1256) 60 26 68, Φαξ: (44-1256) 60 29 96

Ιστοσελίδα: www.cepol.net

---
## THEA~TORNEY GENERAL OF XAS

April 10, 1962

HonorableEarl C. Fitts OpinionNo. W-1304 County Attorney Montague County Re: Whetherwitness fees Montague, Texas may be paid towitnesseswho reside in the countywhere a felony is tried, Dear Mr. Fltts:

Your request for an opinion on the above question is as follows:

"Is there any provision in the law for payment of fees towitnesses in felony cases that live in the county?" "The right ofwitnesses to for their attendance is statutory to such fees only as the statutes 981. receive compensation and they are entitled provide." 44 Tex.Jur.
In Attorney General's Opinion o-1567 there is the following language: "The State does not pay the fees of witnesseswithin the county in felony cases." Also'from Attorney General'sOpinionNo. 0-6456 we quote: "There is no provision for payment of fees in felony cases to witnesseswho reside in the county of trial.

It is therefore our opinion that there is no provision in the law for payment of fees in felony cases towitnesseswho live in the county.
SUMMARY There is no statutoryauthority forHonorable Earl C. Fitts Page 2 OpinionNo. Ww-1304
payment of fees in felony cases to witnesseswho reside in the county of trial. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas BYJ-b.dJdL IrwinR. Saimanson AssistantAttorney General 1RS:sh APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE: W. V. Geppert, Chairman William Hemphill Jack Price Bill Allen REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Houghton Brownlee, Jr.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60251-60252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25940]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

October 4, 2000.
    The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) has submitted the following 
public information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Interested persons may obtain copies of the submission(s) by calling 
the OTS Clearance Officer listed. Send comments regarding this 
information collection to

[[Page 60252]]

the OMB reviewer listed and to the OTS Clearance Officer, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552.

DATES: Submit written comments on or before November 9, 2000.
    OMB Number: 1550-0077.
    Form Number: OTS Form 1579.
    Type of Review: Regular review.
    Title: Operating Subsidiary.
    Description: 12 CFR Part 559 requires a savings association 
proposing to establish or acquire an operating subsidiary or conduct 
new activities in an existing operating subsidiary to either notify the 
OTS or obtain the prior approval of the OTS. The regulation also 
requires a savings association to create and maintain certain 
documents.
    Respondents: Savings and Loan Associations and Savings Banks.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 139.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: 10 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Once per year.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 1,390 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Ralph E. Maxwell, (202) 906-7740, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 1700 Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.

John E. Werner,
Director, Information & Management Services.
[FR Doc. 00-25940 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
Exhibit 

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 50-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 50-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 50-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 3 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 50-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 4 of 5
Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 50-5 Filed 01/29/21 Page 5 of 5
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 99-31356

Summary Calendar

________________________

TIMO ERIC VON HELIN, III,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION

SERVICE; US BUREAU OF PRISONS,

 Respondents-Appellees.

-------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:99-CV-1087

-------------------------------------------------------

July 14, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

Timo Eric Von Helin, III, a native and citizen of Finland, appeals the dismissal of his 28

U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged his detention by the Immigration and Naturalization

Service (INS) after he completed a criminal sentence for mailing threatening communications.

Apparently, he has been charged as removable as an alien who has remained in the United States for

a time longer than permitted. He has since been released on bond.

The district court construed Von Helin’s § 2241 petition as a request for release from

detention without bond or on a reduced bond pending the resolution of his immigration proceeding,

as well as a petition for a favorable ruling on his request for cancellation of removal and adjustment
 

ofstatus. Von Helin does not challenge the bases for the district court’s dismissal of his petition, but

rather, argues that he has been subjected to inhumane conditions of confinement and inadequate

medical care, and requests monetary compensation. These claims should have been and probably

were made in Von Helin’s corresponding civil rights complaint. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S.

477, 481 (1994). Moreover, to the extent he is challenging his former detention, that claim is moot

because he has been released on bond. 

VonHelin’s allegationsthat his conviction resulted fromlies and fabrications are conclusional

and speculative and Von Helin provides no factual basis for them whatsoever. Moreover, under 8

U.S.C. §§ 1252(g) and 1226(e), this court lacks jurisdiction to hear Von Helin’s claims relating to

his detention by the INS and/or his removability. The district court did not err in dismissing Von

Helin’s § 2241 petition. 

AFFIRMED.
N ovember 19, 2015

Exemption No. 12135A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA− 20 15− 1631

Mr. Mark H. Smith

President

Due North Productions

2204 Euclid Street

Santa Monica, CA 90405

Dear Mr. Smith :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter dated August 11, 2015

, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

on behalf of Due North Productions (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment to

your current exemption . That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5),

61.113(a), 61.315(a)

, 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

allows the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection

. You requested an

amendment to conduct closed

- set motion picture and television filming to your operations.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting th e original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition w ould be detrimental to the petitioner

. T he

unmanned aircraft authorized in the original grant are comparable in type, size, weight, speed

and operating capabilities to those in this petition

.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 12135

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is2

granted an amendment to add closed

- set motion picture and television filming to its UAS

operations.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 12135 remain in effect exc ept

as follows. Condition No. 2 has been updated to permit closed

- set motion picture and

television filming

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be

grounds for the immediate suspension or resciss ion of this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming

are permitted.

T his exemption terminates on July 31, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5119 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on calcium chloride phosphate 

phosphor activated by manganese and antimony. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. HUELSKAMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on calcium 

chloride phosphate phosphor activated by manganese and 

antimony. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CALCIUM CHLORIDE PHOSPHATE PHOSPHOR 

4 ACTIVATED BY MANGANESE AND ANTIMONY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.70 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 calcium chloride phosphate phosphor activated by man8 ganese and antimony) is amended by striking the date in 

9 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5119 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS