alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yf i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f

orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). A R / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T T O M A S R E Y E S -T O R R E S ; M E L A N IA O R T E G A - M O N D R A G A N ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v . E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 73870 A ge nc yN os . A 096- 066- 887

A 096- 066- 854 A 096- 066- 855 A 096- 066- 856 A 096- 066- 888 ME MOR AN DU M * O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r17, 2009 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , T R O T T , an dT A S H IM A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T o m a s R e y e s - T o rr e s , h is w if e , M e lan iaO rte g a - M o n d r a g an , an dth e ir c hi l dr e n, na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of M e xi c o, pe t i t i on f

orr e vi e w of

an or de rof

the 

# FI LED DE C 09 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA R/ Res ea r ch 06- 73870 2 B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s ( “ B IA ”) denyi ng thei r m ot i on t o reopen rem ov al pr oc e e di ngs . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f

am o tio n to r e o p e n , O rdo n ezv . I NS , 345 F . 3d 777, 782 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on by denyi ng R ey es ’ m ot i on t o reopen because the B IA consi dere d the evi dence s ub m i tt ed and act ed w i thi n i t s broad d is c r e tio n in d e te rm in in g th a t th e e v id e n c e w a s in s u f f ic ie n t to w arr an t r e o p e n in g . Se e S i n gh v . I

NS , 29 5 F . 3d 10 37 , 10 39 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( the B IA ’ s deni alof a m ot i on t o reopen shal l be re vers ed i f i ti s “ arbi trary , i rr at i on al , or contraryt o l aw ”) . In hi s openi ng bri ef

, R ey es do es no tchal l enge the B IA ’ s det erm i nat i on that h e u n tim e lyf

ile dh is m o tio n to r e c o n s id e rth e m e r its o f th e u n d e r ly in g c a s e . See M a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 12 56 , 12 59 -60 (9th C i r. 19 96 ) ( i ss ues w hi ch ar e no tspec i fi ca l l y r ai se d and ar gu ed i n a party’ s openi ng bri ef ar e w ai ved). P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D .
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4595 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4595

          To extend the suspension of duty on Glyoxylic Acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the suspension of duty on Glyoxylic Acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GLYOXYLIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.01 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Glyoxylic Acid) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### CHESAPEAKE & O. RY. CO. v. MILES.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 23, 1952.

Browning & Gray, Ashland, Wells & Wells, Paintsville, for appellant.

Jasper H. Preece, Inez, for appellee.

*161CULLEN, Commissioner.

The C. & O. Railway Company appeals from a $1,500 judgment against it, in favor ,of Jack D. Miles, for personal injuries súsr tained by Miles while in the employ of the railway company.

Miles’ petition purported to state a cause of action at common law arising out of the negligence of his employer in failing to provide a safe place of employment and in failing to warn him of the dangers incident to the work in which he was engaged, which consisted of replacing rails on a spur track. However, it was clearly established by the evidence on the trial that Miles’ employment was in ’ interstate commerce, and therefore, if Miles had any cause of action, it necessarily was under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. See Louisville & N. Railroad Co. v. Brandenburg, 207 Ky. 689, 270 S.W. 1; Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Rucker, 246 Ky. 161, 54 S. W.2d 642.

The Federal 'Employers’ Liability Act provides, 45 U.S.C.A. § 56:

> “No action shall be maintained under this ' chapter unless commenced within three years from the day the cause of action accrued.”

The accident in which Miles was injured occurred on September 24, 1945, and his action was not commenced until April 28, 1949, which was more than three years after the cause of action accrued. In his petition, Miles sought to escape the bar of the statute by alleging that he was an infant at the time of the accident, and that he became of age less than one year before the action was commenced, thus bringing himself within the provisions of the Kentucky limitation statute, ICRS 413.-170, which, suspends the running of limitations during infancy.

Because the plaintiff’s petition did not allege facts showing that the parties were engaged in interstate commerce at the time of the accident, the defendant railway company was not able to raise by demurrer the question of limitations under the Federal statute, 'but the company properly raised the question by answer. The lower court'ruled that the action was not barred by limitations.

. It appears to be the uniform rule that state statutes of limitation have no application, to an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. See Bell v. Wabash Ry. Co., 8 Cir.; 58 F.2d 569; Shannon v. Boston & M. R. R., 77 N.H. 349, 92 A. 167; Vaught v. Virginia, etc., R. Co., 132 Tenn. 679, 179 S.W. 314; Osbourne v. United States, 2 Cir., 164 F.2d 767. It has -been specifically held that the-Federal statute is not tolled by infancy, Gillette v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 91 N.J.L. 220, 102 A. 673; Link v. Carolina & N. W. Ry. Co., 198 N.C. 78, 150 S.E. 672; or by insanity, Alvarado v. Southern Pac. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 193 S.W. 1108.

It is our opinion that the Federal statute is' exclusive on the question of limitations, and that the plea of limitations in the case before us should have been upheld,

The judgment is reversed, with directions to sustain the plea of limitations.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfred Teixeira, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J.), rendered on or about January 28, 1988, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of attempted assault in the first degree and sentencing him to a determinate term of six months’ imprisonment and 4 *Vz*years of probation, is unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting of the Advisory Panel for Cognitive, Psychological and Language Sciences (                    #                    1758);                

*Date and Time:*                         October 11-13, 2000; 8:00 a.m.-6:30 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 390, Arlington, VA.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Catherine Ball, Program Director for Linguistics, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 995, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8731.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning support for research proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support.                              ( print page 60220)    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate linguistics proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: October 3, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-25821  Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SELF STRAWDER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 126 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2018, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, which 

Petitioner restyled Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis, is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 12

                           SONAT INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        Computation of Ratios of Earnings
                   from Continuing Operations to Fixed Charges
                              Total Enterprise (a)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          Nine Months Ended Sept 30,                       Years Ended December 31,


                                            1997           1996            1996        1995         1994         1993        1992
                                            ----           ----            ----        ----         ----         ----        ----

                                                                                              (In Thousands)

Earnings from Continuing Operations:
<S>                                      <C>            <C>             <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>     
   Income (loss) before income taxes     $170,951       $196,513        $294,304    $282,497     $154,871     $364,198    $133,728
Fixed charges (see computation below)     112,881        115,551         152,830     165,154      127,909      129,160     156,428
   Less allowance for interest 
     capitalized                           (2,905)        (3,918)         (5,094)     (6,540)      (6,692)      (4,101)     (8,422)
                                         --------       --------        --------    --------     --------     --------    --------
Total Earnings Available for 
   Fixed Charges                         $280,927       $308,146        $442,040    $441,111     $276,088     $489,257    $281,734
                                         ========       ========        ========    ========     ========     ========    ========


Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense before deducting
      interest capitalized               $107,048       $110,339        $145,406    $157,653     $120,295     $122,204    $149,165
   Rentals(b)                               5,833          5,212           7,424       7,501        7,614        6,956       7,263
                                         --------       --------        --------    --------     --------     --------    --------
                                         $112,881       $115,551        $152,830    $165,154     $127,909     $129,160    $156,428
                                         ========       ========        ========    ========     ========     ========    ========


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges            2.5            2.7             2.9         2.7          2.2          3.8         1.8
                                         ========       ========        ========    ========     ========     ========    ========


</TABLE>


----------------

(a)  Amounts  include the  Company's  portion of the  captions as they relate to
     persons accounted for by the equity method.

(b)  These  amounts  represent  1/3 of rentals  which  approximate  the interest
     factor  applicable to such rentals of the Company and its  subsidiaries and
     continuing unconsolidated affiliates.
#### HANCOCK v. STATE.

No. 25920.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 28, 1952.

Burks & McNeil, by Burton S. Burks, Lubbock, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*221BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Tlie appeal is from a. conviction for driving a motor. vehicle upon a public highway while appellant’s license was suspended. The fine was $25.

The complaint and information do not allege that he had an operator’s license at the time of his conviction in the former offense. There is no allegation upon which proof may be admitted to show that he did, and there is no such proof in the record.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed. Barber v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.App., 18, 191 S.W.2d 879; Holloway v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 237 S.W.2d 303.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5135 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain tamper resistant ground fault 

circuit interrupters. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. ISRAEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain tamper resistant 

ground fault circuit interrupters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN TAMPER RESISTANT GROUND FAULT 

4 CIRCUIT INTERRUPTERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5135 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) receptacles 

designed to prevent insertion of foreign objects, 

each with internal shutters 

and clearly marked TR 

(‘tamper resistant’), certified by the importer as 

meeting the 2008 National 

Electric Code Section 

406.11 for 15 ampere or 

20 ampere receptacles 

(provided for in subheading 8536.30.80) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

         The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of Community Financial Holding Company, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby each certify as follows:

         The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company (the "Report"), which
accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This 24th day of March 2003.


/s/ Thomas J. Martin
-----------------------------------------
Thomas J. Martin, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


/s/ Ann K. Marshall
-----------------------------------------
Ann K. Marshall, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Community Financial Holding Company, Inc. and will be retained by
Community Financial Holding Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00454-ADA

ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY DISCOVERY HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

DISCOVERY HEARING by Zoomoom on Tuesday, March 30, 2021 at 09:30 AM.

set

IT 26th day of March, 2021.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 66 Filed 03/26/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 12(b)



Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Union Pacific Railroad Company and Consolidated Subsidiary and Affiliate Companies

(Unaudited)



|                                                         |  |         |   |  |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------- | - |  | ------- | -
|Nine Months Ended Sept. 30,                              | 
|Millions of Dollars, Except
Ratios                       |  | 2005    |   |  | 2004    |  
|Earnings:                                                |  |         |   |  |         |  
|Net income                                               |  | $   739 |   |  | $   536 |  
|Equity earnings net of distributions                     |  | (38     | ) |  | (47     | )
|Total
earnings                                           |  | 701     |   |  | 489     |  
|Income
taxes                                             |  | 239     |   |  | 238     |  
|Fixed charges:                                           |  |         |   |  |         |  
|Interest expense including amortization of debt discount |  | 369     |   |  | 374     |  
|Portion of rentals representing an interest factor       |  | 162     |   |  | 144     |  
|Total fixed
charges                                      |  | 531     |   |  | 518     |  
|Earnings available for
fixed charges                     |  | $1,471  |   |  | $1,245  |  
|Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges                       |  | 2.8     |   |  | 2.4     |
Exhibit 31.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

         I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, AIG Debenture-Backed Series 2002-10 Trust (the "Trust"), certify
that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
         Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
         servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in
         respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report
         of the Trust;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
         omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
         in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
         not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
         annual report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
         provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
         under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in
         such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

     4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
         based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
         Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.



Date: March 27, 2006


      /s/ DAVID J. KOLIBACHUK
-----------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5257 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5257

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on product mixtures 
                    containing mesosulfuron-methyl.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Neugebauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on product mixtures 
                    containing mesosulfuron-methyl.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MESOSULFURON-METHYL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.48 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Mesosulfuron-methyl) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```