alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 00-74]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 00-74 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

Dated: October 2, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 59400)          ( print page 59401)          ( print page 59402)    

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[FR Doc. 00-25577  Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Oragenics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Robert T. Zahradnik,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written certification has been provided to the company and
      will
      be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated
      this March 23, 2006.




/s/
                Robert T. Zahradnik
              Robert
                T. Zahradnik
              Chief
                Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 514 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                     February 15, 2011.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
514) entitled ``An Act to extend expiring provisions of the USA PATRIOT 
Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 and Intelligence Reform and 
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 relating to access to business 
records, individual terrorists as agents of foreign powers, and roving 
wiretaps until December 8, 2011.'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 
      following:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FISA Sunsets Extension Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUNSETS OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO ACCESS TO 
              BUSINESS RECORDS, INDIVIDUAL TERRORISTS AS AGENTS OF 
              FOREIGN POWERS, AND ROVING WIRETAPS.

    (a) USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005.--
Section 102(b)(1) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization 
Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-177; 50 U.S.C. 1805 note, 50 U.S.C. 1861 
note, and 50 U.S.C. 1862 note) is amended by striking ``February 28, 
2011'' and inserting ``May 27, 2011''.
    (b) Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.--
Section 6001(b)(1) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention 
Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458; 118 Stat. 3742; 50 U.S.C. 1801 note) 
is amended by striking ``February 28, 2011'' and inserting ``May 27, 
2011''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H.R. 514

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

November 1, 2011 Session

 CYNTHIA RHEA HELTON V. GREGORY HERBERT HELTON 

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Anderson County

No. 10CH1508 William E. Lantrip, Chancellor

No. E2011-01237-COA-R3-CV-FILED-NOVEMBER 1, 2011

This is a divorce case. Gregory Herbert Helton appeals from the “final” judgment of divorce

entered April 29, 2011. That judgment is not a final judgment. Accordingly, the appellant’s

appeal is hereby dismissed.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., D. MICHAEL SWINEY, AND JOHN W. MCCLARTY, JJ.

Gregory Herbert Helton, Knoxville, Tennessee, appellant, pro se.

Patty Jane Lay, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Cynthia Rhea Helton.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

1

The trial court’s judgment of April 29, 2011, decrees, among other things, that the

marital residence is to be disposed of “through auction/sale.” The judgment further decrees

that “[t]he Court reserves the division of any profits or deficiencies associated with the sale.”

Therefore the judgment is not a final judgment. “A final judgment is one that resolves all the

issues in the case, ‘leaving nothing else for the trial court to do.’ ” In re Estate of

Henderson, 121 S.W.3d 643, 645 (Tenn. 2003) (quoting State ex rel. McAllister v. Goode,

968 S.W.2d 834, 840 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997)). Tenn. R. App. P. 3(a) provides, in relevant

Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides as follows: 1

ThisCourt, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may

affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum

opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When

a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated

“MEMORANDUM OPINION,” shall not be published, and shall not be

cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.
part, that “any order that adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of

fewer than all the parties is not enforceable or appealable. . . .” “Such an order is

interlocutory or interim in nature and generally cannot be appealed as of right.” In re Estate

of Henderson, 121 S.W.3d at 645. This court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to

adjudicate an appeal if there is no final judgment. See Bayberry Assocs. v. Jones, 783

S.W.2d 553, 559 (Tenn. 1990) (“Unless an appeal from an interlocutory order is provided

by the rules or by statute, appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments only.”).

As this appeal was taken from a judgment that was not final, we lack subject matter

jurisdiction. Accordingly, we must dismiss the appeal.

The appeal of this matter is dismissed and this case is remanded to the trial court.

Costs on appeal are taxed to the appellant, Gregory Herbert Helton.

PER CURIAM

-2-
Ǧ
ͶͶȋǤͻȀʹͲͳͻȌ   ͳ



		



 
ͶͶ  

  

 ̵ first business day 

 Ǥ    Ǥ

MUST Ǥ

STATE COURT INFORMATIONǣ

ͳǤ ǢǢ

Ǥ

ʹǤ ǫ     

ǡǫ

       

STATE COURT INFORMATIONǣ

ͳǤ ǡǡǤǡ

ȋȌ̵ǡǡ

ǡȋȌǤ

ʹǤǡȋȌǦǤ

 

161st District Court, Ector County, Texas; Cause No. B-20-04-0425-CV; Yariel Figueroa Guzman v. Knight

Transportation Services, LLC and Family Dollar Stores of Texas, LLC

Midland-Odessa

Family Dollar Stores of Texas, LLC 5/15/2020

See attached additional page

N/A

Case 7:20-cv-00136 Document 1-3 Filed 05/27/20 Page 1 of 5
Ǧ
ͶͶȋǤͻȀʹͲͳͻȌ   ʹ

͵Ǥ ǦǡǡǡȋȌ

Ǥ

COUNTERCLAIMS, CROSS-CLAIMS, and/or THIRD-PARTY CLAIMSǣ

ͳǤ ǡǦǡǦ

Ǥ	ǡǦǡǦǡ

ǡǡǤǡȋȌ

̵ǡǡ

ǡȋȌǤ

VERIFICATIONǣ

    

Ȁ



ȋǣ͵Ȍ

 

N/A

N/A

/s/ Kenneth C. Riney

Family Dollar Stores of Texas, LLC

Case 7:20-cv-00136 Document 1-3 Filed 05/27/20 Page 2 of 5
Ǧ
ͶͶȋǤͻȀʹͲͳͻȌ   ͵

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (As necessary)ǣ

Case 7:20-cv-00136 Document 1-3 Filed 05/27/20 Page 3 of 5
______________________________________________________________________________

LIST OF ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD Page | 1

7686514v1 (79656.00078.000)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

YARIEL FIGUEROA GUZMAN,

 Plaintiff,

§

§

§

§

vs. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:20-cv-136

§

KNIGHT TRANSPORTATION 

SERVICES, INC., AND FAMILY 

DOLLAR STORES OF TEXAS, LLC,

§

§

§

§

§

§

Jury Demand

§

Defendants. §

LIST OF ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Counsel for Plaintiff

Milad K. Farah

State Bar No.: 24055466

Geoffrey A. Borschow

State Bar No.: 24082708

FARAH LAW GROUP, PLLC

1231 E. Missouri

El Paso, Texas 79902

TEL: (915) 533-0880

FAX: (915) 533-1155

mkf@gflawoffices.com

gab@gflawoffices.com

Counsel for Defendant Family Dollar Stores of Texas, LLC

Kenneth C. Riney

State Bar No.: 24046721

Johnathan D. Jordan

State Bar No.: 24100509

KANE RUSSELL COLEMAN LOGAN PC

901 Main Street, Suite 5200

Dallas, Texas 75202

TEL: (214) 777-4200

FAX: (214) 777-4299

Case 7:20-cv-00136 Document 1-3 Filed 05/27/20 Page 4 of 5
______________________________________________________________________________

LIST OF ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD Page | 2

7686514v1 (79656.00078.000)

kriney@krcl.com

jjordan@krcl.com

Counsel for Defendant Knight Transportation, Inc. 

Michael P. Sharp

State Bar No. 00788857

Jeff C. Wright

State Bar No.: 24008306

J. Taylor Shaw

State Bar No. 24106422

FEE, SMITH, SHARP & VITULLO, LLP

Three Galleria Tower

13155 Noel Road, Suite 1000

Dallas, Texas 75240

TEL: (972) 616-7614

FAX: (972) 934-9200

msharp@feesmith.com

jwright@feesmith.com

tshaw@feesmith.com

Case 7:20-cv-00136 Document 1-3 Filed 05/27/20 Page 5 of 5
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Export Administration

The Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory Committee will meet on October 25, 2000, 9 a.m., at the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th Street between Pennsylvania & Constitution Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical question that affect the level of export controls applicable to transportation and related equipment or technology.

### Agenda

1. Opening remarks by the Chairman.

2. Consultation with Committee on renewal of charter.

3. Review of pending regulatory revisions.

4. Update on missile technology issues.

5. Update on Wassenaar Arrangement negotiations.

6. Presentation of papers or comments by the public.

7. Review of status of actions items from previous meeting.

8. Member assignments for Wassenaar Arrangement proposals.

                    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of seats                           ( print page 60168)                        will be available. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests that you forward your public presentation materials two weeks prior to the meeting to the following address: Ms. Lee Ann Carpenter, OSIES/EA/BXA Ms: 3876, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th & Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.                

For more information or copies of the minutes, please call Lee Ann Carpenter on (202) 482-2583.

Dated: October 4, 2000.

Lee Ann Carpenter,

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-25937 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Janet L. Ziomek, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 of Rotech Healthcare Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:  April 13, 2004
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5384 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 11:1. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Ms. FUDGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 11:1. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BASIC VIOLET 11:1. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.25 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Basic Violet 11:1) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Arkansas Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Arkansas Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 156    | 146    | 99     | 195   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 221    | 257    | 264    | 253    | 325    | 420    | 623    | 1,047  | 2,183  | 5,872 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7,274  | 5,919  | 3,520  | 4,844  | 4,011  | 635    | 369    | 1,106  | 335    | 273   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 269    | 72     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5098 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5098

 To renew the temporary suspension of duty on AC electric motors of an 
            output exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 95 W.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Gerlach introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To renew the temporary suspension of duty on AC electric motors of an 
            output exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 95 W.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AC ELECTRIC MOTORS OF AN OUTPUT EXCEEDING 74.6 W BUT NOT 
              EXCEEDING 95 W.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.85.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to AC electric motors of an 
output exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 95 W) is amended by striking 
the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```