alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5206 

To suspend temporarily the duty on window shade material composed of 

woven fiberglass coated with ethyl vinyl acetate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. MULVANEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on window shade material 

composed of woven fiberglass coated with ethyl vinyl acetate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WINDOW SHADE MATERIAL COMPOSED OF 

4 WOVEN FIBERGLASS COATED WITH ETHYL 

5 VINYL ACETATE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5206 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Window shade material 

composed of woven fiberglass coated with ethyl 

vinyl acetate (provided for 

in subheading 7019.59.90) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10












 
	EXHIBIT 10(a)


	INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT





	
      We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment
        No. 10 to Registration Statement File No. 811-09049 on Form N-1A of Mercury
        Master Trust (the “Registration Statement”) of our report dated
        July 13, 2001 on Mercury Master International Portfolio appearing in the
        May 31, 2001 Annual Report of Mercury International Fund, our report dated
        July 12, 2001 on Mercury Master Pan-European Growth Portfolio appearing
        in the May 31, 2001 Annual Report of Mercury Pan-European Growth Fund,
        our report dated July 13, 2001 on Mercury Master U.S. Large Cap Portfolio
        appearing in the May 31, 2001 Annual Report of Mercury U.S. Large Cap
        Fund and our report dated July 13, 2001 on Mercury Master U.S. Small Cap
        Growth Portfolio appearing in the May 31, 2001 Annual Report of Mercury
        U.S. Small Cap Growth Fund.

      We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the
        Registration Statement of our report dated November 21, 2000 on Mercury
        Master Select Growth Portfolio appearing in the September 30, 2000 Annual
        Report of Mercury Select Growth Fund and our report dated January 18,
        2001 on Mercury Master Global Balanced Portfolio appearing in the November
        30, 2000 Annual Report of Mercury Global Balanced Fund.

    




	
       /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

       New York, New York

        September 20 ,
        2001
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Care Financing Administration

Part F, of the Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services, Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), 49 FR 34247, dated September 6, 1998, is amended to include the following delegation of authority from the Secretary to the Administrator, HCFA, for Title II of the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999.
    - Section F.30., Delegations of Authority is amended by adding the following paragraph:

UU. The authorities vested in the Secretary by Title II, “Expanded Availability of Health Care Services,” under the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999, Pub. L. 106-170, as amended hereafter, and as they relate to the mission of HCFA.

This delegation shall be exercised under the Department's existing delegation of authority and policy on regulations. In addition, I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by the HCFA Administrator or other HCFA officials which, in effect, involved the exercise of this authority prior to the effective date of this delegation.

This delegation is effective September 25, 2000.

Dated: September 25, 2000.

Donna E. Shalala,

The Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-25813 Filed 10-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4120-03-M
|                                                                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                      
|California - Coastal Region Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                      
|California - Coastal Region Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 3      | 2      | 3      | 0      | 72     | 4      | 6      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 56     | 0      | 8      | 0      | 11     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 11     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
5 C m iicf/k' C/is If 

4-Dct Fcç >' QL6) çj Jucftle/ y' ,7k Circtiit j 1 MAY 52020 

,L 

J; COMPLhINT OF JuDICIAL MiSCONDUCT OR DISABIL 

-- - gin the complaint process, TkPU1Y CLERK complete thisform and prepare the bnef statement of facts descibed in item 4 (below). The RULES FOR JUDICIAL-CONDUCT AND JUDI L-DIsABILrrY PROCEEDINGS, adóp by the Judicial Conference of the UthtedStaies;-contàin information on what to include in a complaint (Rule 6), where 

to file a complaint (Rule 7),.aad other iinportaiit matters. The Rules are available in federalcourt clerks' offices, on individual federal courI' websites; and onwww..uscourts.aov. 

Yourcomplaint (this fbnn and the statement of facts) should be typewiitten and must be legible. For thenumber of copies to file, consultthe local rules Or clerk's office of the court in which your cornplaintis-required tObeled. Enclose each copy of the complaint in an envelope mirlced 'COMPLAiNT OF MISCONDUCT" or "COMPLAINT:OF DISABILITY" and submit iflo the appropriate clerk of court. Donotput the name of any judge on the envelope. 1: 2 0 C V Q 5 3 4 LY 

1. : Name of Complainant 

Contact Address 

2. 

3. 

Daytime telephone: 

Name(s) of Judge(s): 

ourt 

Does tbis'complauit 

BYes [JNo 

If "yes," ve:thefollowing information-about each lawsuit 

1 

;'57 ,t,1&/2;?/ 1'I 

Court / 

Case Number! 

Docket number of anyappealto the Circuit 

Are (were) you a party or lawyer in the lawsuit? d 

[Party Lawyer flNeither 

If you are (were) a party and have (bad) a lawyer, give the lawyer's name, 

number: K/ 7rfl) 

Page 1. of 2 

'C fco,'i 

C/4ç c4-r 

and telephone 

Case 1:20-cv-00534-LY Document 1 Filed 05/15/20 Page 1 of 2
AO 310 (Rev. 03116) Judicial Côu±icitofthe L .cLifs i" 

4. Brief Statement of Facts. Attach a brief statement of the specific facts onwhich the claim of judicial 

rthsconductor disability isbaaed. Include what-happened, whenand where ithappened, and any 

rnformation that would help an investigator check the facts If the complaint alleges judicial disabthty, 

also include any additional facts that foba.ofaliegation.. 

Dec'Jaration andsignature: 

I declare under penalty of peijuiy th tthe statements madein this complaint are true and correct to the 

best ofmy knowledge. 

Signature: ________________Date:____ 

Page2of 2 

Case 1:20-cv-00534-LY Document 1 Filed 05/15/20 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This is a legend.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              66
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      480
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        343
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1106
<PP&E>                                           32656
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   28533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2531
<BONDS>                                           2571
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         27
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        8698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     28533
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2479
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    231
<INCOME-TAX>                                        82
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                149
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       149
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SHELDON LARRY, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-2474

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 25, 2020. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, 

Judge.

Sheldon Larry, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford 

Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tampa, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE 

SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.
AIRWARE INTERNATIONAL CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of AirWare International Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin J. Asher, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
Kevin J. AsherKevin J. AsherChief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Accounting OfficerMay 16, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AirWare International Corp. and will be retained by AirWare International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Begin forwarded message: 

From: jonathan lee 

Date: September 20, 2019 at 9:26:00 AM CDT 

To: Mike Villarreal 

Cc: "jsaenznext Rebekah Maldonado 

Subject: Re: White Flag Meeting

Good Morning Everyone,

As the owner of ZroBlack, LLC, this is a reminder that all items in the previously sent email are due at 5pm CST 

9/20/2019 (today), and Gun-Lee must have everything in their possession by that time. The return of cash 

payment can be sent via wire to Gun-Lee (call or email Gunn-Lee for instructions), or given to Gun-Lee in person 

or by courier via cashier check. 

Moreover, to ensure I have clearly documented this, on July 27th, John Saenz asked if I would make a claim to the 

IRS that $750,000 he had received from himself be formally recognized as a gift and not as a payment from 

ZroBlack. He mentions this is his intent, and it was not formalized yet. I mentioned that IRS fraud is something I 

will be party to. 

I had an obligation as the owner of ZroBlack,LLC to contact local law enforcement to make them aware that my 

company asset is being held ,and John is refusing to give back my company property. I have tried to resolve 

things amicably as noted with Mike Villarreal, yet I am being extorted for more money in the form of percentages 

of revenue to which I signed under duress. I have also spoken with the FBI for assistance and they will be looking 

into a possible investigation for corporate fraud. I was advised by the FBI today 9/20/2019 @ 6:47am via phone 

to let them know of any updates today pertaining to the recovery of all ZroBlack assets. 

Re-iteration: Only work done for the PSA 1-year contract can be claimed in a payment dispute since this is the 

only Contract ZroBlack had at the time, and the only source of revenue. Again, a dispute does not mean ZroBlack, 

LLC will or has to approve the claim. 

Lastly, after reviewing the 1st PSA Amendment, John Saenz released and all of its 

affiliates (Jonathan Villarreal) from any demands, payments etc. This renders the Release (which I signed under 

duress) between John and I NULL. 

I have expressed to Mike Villarreal, and John Saenz, through text, email, phone conversations, and in person at 

the law offices of Gunn-Lee, that because of John’s performance, my life's work is in jeopardy. Although John 

was released by , John's performance materially impacted the PSA and a decrease in 

percentage of revenue was warranted by the client since they would no longer be getting work from both parties 

meaning John and I. I will also be seeking damages for all revenue lost because of John’s Performance as a 

previous partner in ZroBlack. 

I am hopeful for a return of all ZroBlack assets by today at 5pm CST. 

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-24 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully,

Jonathan Villarreal 

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-24 Filed 01/15/21 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|U.S. Federal Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|U.S. Federal Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,737  | 1,605  | 747    | 2,077  | 1,408  | 885    | 2,772  | 924    | 720    | 162   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 910    | 332    | 618    | 1,079  | 348    | 255    | 311    | 142    | 193    | 1,379 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 95     | 2      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Delvas, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Examination of the five controlling factors enumerated in *People v Taranovich*(37 NY2d 442, 445) leads us to conclude that defendant was not denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. He entered a plea of guilty on the date set for trial, just over nine months from the date of indictment, at which time the People had announced their readiness for trial. A portion of the delay was attributable to defendant’s omnibus motion and subsequent motion to dismiss for insufficiency of the evidence before the Grand Jury. As found by the court, no portion of the delay was "asked for, *978granted or chargeable to the People.” Although defendant was incarcerated throughout, his incarceration was a consequence of a prior conviction. Indeed, it was during the course of that incarceration that the instant charges arose. Finally, defendant has neither claimed nor demonstrated any prejudice from the slight delay, nor do we perceive any. (Appeal from judgment of Oneida County Court, Cunningham, J.—attempted promoting of prison contraband, first degree.) Present —Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
#### McCURDY v. STATE.

Nos. 26875, 26876.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 3, 1954.

*601No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

These are companion cases, each charging possession of intoxicating liquor in a ■dry area for the purpose of sale. The cases were tried jointly before the same jury upon pleas of guilty.

There are no bills of exception or statement of facts.

Separate verdicts were returned in each of which the punishment was assessed at 30 days in jail and a fine,of $100.

■ A joint judgment was entered in which the two verdicts are set out, and it is ordered that the state recover “the sum of $100 and all costs in both cases” and that the defendant “be confined in the County Jail until the full amount of said fine and costs are paid.”

The verdicts being before us, we are authorized to reform the judgment so as to provide for the serving of the jail term in addition to the fine and costs in each case. See Gipson v. State, 58 Tex.Cr.R. 403, 126 S.W. 267.

The trial court having made no effort to cumulate the two jail terms, they may be served' concurrently. See Bristow v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 267 S.W.2d 415.

The judgments will be reformed in thé particulars mentioned and, as reformed, are affirmed. .
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5149 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5149

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Brown 25.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Kissell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Brown 25.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT BROWN 25.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.50 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Pigment Brown 25) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```