alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 25 , 2015

Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2015

- 0111

Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mailcode: 2822T 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

To Whom It May Concern:

My name is Abby Bertz

, I live in Mayview, Missouri and I am a member of the FFA, where I currently

serve as Area VI President

. Today, we have heard previous panels speak a lot about sons coming back to the farm, but it is also important to remember the financially healthy farms bringing daughters back as

well. I am speaking in support of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and I hope you will consider my comments when making your decision.

We need a renewable replacement to fossil fuels that will keep our economy standing strong and protect the family budget. The ethanol industry supports the consumer

, industrial manufacturing

, grain producer s

, transporter s

, and companies leading technological advancements to further prove and

enhance th i s renewable fuel. For every 100 million gallons produced, two thousand jobs are created. According to the Energy Future Coalition, the US saw a $ 16.8 billion economic impact in our nation's

Gross Domestic Product due solely to the production of ethanol

.

As a child of parents that both contribute to ethanol , grain and livestock industries , I see first

hand the jobs the industry s upports. If our country’s families can find jobs within the industry and take advantage of the cost effective resource, we in tur n see economic relief and economic expansion due to higher disposable income, ultimately saving consumers.

The benefits of ethanol span further than the economy, it also includes a positive impact on our

environment. With a society that seems to understa nd the value of sustaining our planet, it is interesting that the idea of gasoline alternatives aiding in environmental progress is often overlooked. Ethanol serves as a high octa ne, high performance fuel emitting 51% fewer greenhouse gases than gasoline,

and 34% fewer carbon dioxide emissions, as studied by the Renewable Fuels Association. With ethanol

we can breathe easier knowing we are using a cleaner, high performing fuel.

In today’s society, we are all looking for better alternatives and t echnologies . With a reliable,

renewable

, raw material source grown in every state, ethanol is an efficient Made in the USA product. I firmly believe in a product that supports our local growers, continues to decrease fuel costs , is environmentally friendly and suppo rts job growth . An industry that su pports us all is one to embrace. I strongly s upport a stable RFS and ask that you change the final proposal to comply with the existing law. The RFS works for America

- and American families.

Sincerely,

Abby Bertz

Abby Bertz 12113 Prairie Valley Road Mayview, MO 64071
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 12(b)

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

Union Pacific Railroad Company and Consolidated Subsidiary and Affiliate
Companies (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Nine Months Ended September 30,
Millions of Dollars, Except Ratios ...............           2002            2001
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                      <C>              <C>
Earnings:
   Net income ....................................        $   973         $   757
   Undistributed equity earnings .................            (39)            (34)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total earnings ...................................            934             723
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income taxes .....................................            575             450
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed charges:
   Interest expense including amortization of debt
     discount ....................................            412             441
   Portion of rentals representing an interest
     factor ......................................             32              30
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges ..............................            444             471
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings available for fixed charges .............        $ 1,953         $ 1,644
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ...............            4.4             3.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

DROPBOX, INC.,

Plaintiff/CounterDefendant,

v.

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC,

Defendant/CounterPlaintiff.

Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-00251-ADA

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DROPBOX, INC.,

Defendant.

Civil Action No.: 6:21-cv-758-ADA

ORDER

This Court, after considering Dropbox Inc.’s Response (ECF No. 177) to Motion

Offense’s Rule 72(a) Objections and Appeal from Judge Gilliland’s November 1, 2022 NonDispositive Order (ECF No. 173, “Objections to Non-Dispositive Order”), is of the opinion

that the Objections to Non-Dispositive Order Motion to Stay should be denied. Motion 

Offense filed its objections before Judge Gilliland entered his Discovery Dispute Order (ECF 

No. 180) on January 6, 2023. In his Order, Judge Gilliland provides additional reasons that 

compel this Court to affirm his rulings from the bench on November 1, 2022.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Motion Offense’s Objections to the Non-Dispositive 

Order are DENIED, and Judge Gilliland’s November 1, 2022 Non-Dispositive Order and his 

January 6, 2023 Discovery Dispute Order are hereby AFFIRMED. 

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 182 Filed 01/10/23 Page 1 of 2
SIGNED this 10th day of January, 2023.

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 182 Filed 01/10/23 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southwest Water Company (the “Company”)for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anton C. Garnier,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledgethat:

 

(1)               theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | November 12, 2003                                |   | /s/ ANTON C. GARNIER |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------|
|   | **Anton C. Garnier****Chief Executive  Officer** |

 

 

1

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4812 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on open top, electric indoor 

grills. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on open top, 

electric indoor grills. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OPEN TOP, ELECTRIC INDOOR GRILLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.45 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 open top, electric indoor grills) is amended by striking the 

7 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4812 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### COLEMAN v. STATE.

No. 23737.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 29, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Gocns, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated. The punishment is assessed at a fine of $50.

The record is before us without any bills of exception. The statement of facts accompanying the transcript does not bear the approval of the trial judge, and therefore cannot be considered by us. Under the statute, art. 760, Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C.C.P., it is necessary that such statement be approved and signed by the judge trying the case. See Lynch v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 199 S.W.2d 172, and cases cited under Note 24, art. 760, supra, including the Pocket Part.

We have examined the remaining portion of the record and find no error shown therein.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.
#### MOORE v. STATE.

No. 25559.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 12, 1951.

Thomas & Thomas, Big Spring, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The information upon which this prosecution rested was sufficient to charge the unlawful transportation of beer in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $500.

That there were other charges in the same count of the.information charging or attempting to charge the unlawful transportation of the beer, without reference to the dry or wet status of the area, would not render the information duplicitous, because different phases of the same offense; that is, the unlawful transportation of beer, may be charged conjunctively *241in the same count. Branch’s Penal Code, Section 508.

The statement of facts fails to evidence the dry status of Martin County, especially the publication order putting local option in effect. Baldridge v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 590, 106 S.W.2d 700; Craig v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 186, 167 S.W.2d 523; Langston v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 35, 171 S.W.2d 371.

The facts being insufficient to support the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5231 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on Desmodur HL 

BA. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty 

on Desmodur HL BA. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESMODUR HL BA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.18 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Desmodur HL BA) is amended— 

7 (1) by amending the article description to read 

8 as follows: ‘‘2,4-Diisocyanato-1-methylbenzene, poly9 mer with 1,6-diisocyanatohexane (CAS No. 26426– 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5231 IH

1 91–5) dissolved in organic solvent (provided for in 

2 subheading 3911.90.45)’’; and 

3 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

4 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

7 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

MidCarolina Financial Corporation and Subsidiary

Burlington, North Carolina

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-146523 filed as of October 5, 2007; 333-153802 and 333-153803 both filed as of October 2, 2008) on Form S-8 of MidCarolina Financial Corporation and Subsidiary (the
Company) of our report dated March 15, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company, which report appears in the Companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC

Raleigh, North Carolina

March 15, 2011
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Estimated Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Estimated Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 5,567  | 5,151  |        |        |        | 4,620  | 4,517  | 4,590  | 4,568 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4,478  | 4,480  | 4,545  | 4,645  | 4,775  | 4,724  | 4,889  | 4,942  | 4,855  | 4,897 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5,072  | 5,138  | 5,038  | 5,166  | 5,318  | 5,424  | 5,608  | 6,263  | 7,009  | 7,017 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6,974  | 7,139  | 7,570  | 7,607  | 7,877  | 8,031  | 7,514  | 7,324  | 8,314  | 9,217 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 9,223  | 9,486  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




In connection with the annual report of
NuRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), I, Steven Gershick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and




2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Date: January28, 2010


/s/ Steven
      GershickName:
              Steven
    GershickTitle:
              Chief Financial
      Officer(principal financial
      officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5370 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5370

         To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Ethylhexylamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Fitzpatrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Ethylhexylamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-ETHYLHEXYLAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        2-Ethylhexylamine   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 104-75-                                                  12/31/2015
                          6) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2921.19.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**OFFICERCERTIFICATION**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Southwestern Public Service Company (SPS) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (Form 10-Q), each of theundersigned officers of SPS certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to such officer’s knowledge:

 

(1)           The Form 10-Qfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of SPS as of the dates andfor the periods expressed in the Form 10-Q.

 
| Date: May 3, 2010 |                                       |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                       |
|                   | /s/ C. RILEY HILL                          |
|                   | C. Riley Hill                              |
|                   | President and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                   |                                       |
|                   | /s/ DAVID M. SPARBY                        |
|                   | David M. Sparby                            |
|                   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to SPS and will be retained by SPS andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### REZA v. STATE.

No. 23752.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 29, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s A-tty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Felony theft is the offense';' the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The sole question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence.

Rushing, the injured party, was building a house. A lumber company had delivered to him five windows, four panel doors, one kitchen door, and two screen doors of the aggregate value of $63.30. The windows had been nailed to the frames. .The doors were on the premises. All this property was stolen from the premises the night of March 2, 1946. Appellant had been employed in the laying of the floor in the house. The witness Robinson was also constructing a house. The original contractor having failed in his contract, Robinson engaged appellant to complete the construction. Appellant drew money in advance on the work. Robinson complained and threatened prosecution if he did not get the material as he had agreed. Shortly thereafter, appellant brought to Robinson five windows, four doors, two screen doors and a kitchen door. This, according to Robinson’s testimony, was “sometime in the last part of March.” The four doors would not fit in the frames and were carried away-by appellant. Rushing identified the five windows and the screen and kitchen doors as those which were stolen from him. Appellant did not *371testify. He offered no explanation of his possession of a part of the stolen property nor presented any affirmative defense.

 The rule is well established that the unexplained possession of property recently stolen is a sufficient circumstance to authorize a jury to convict for theft of the property. Branch’s P.C., Sec. 2463 ; 41 Tex.Jur., Sec. 128, p. 206 ; 25 Tex.Dig., Larceny, and authorities there cited. It is equally well settled that from the possession of a part of the stolen property, theft of the whole may be inferred. 41 Tex.Jur., Sec. 128, p. 206; Dean v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 411, 154 S.W.2d 459, and authorities there cited.

When tested in the light of the rules stated, the facts are deemed sufficient to support the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.