September 2 , 2014

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and

Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) and 14 C.F.R.

Part 11, Industrial Aerobotics (“IA”), the developer and operator of the SD02 Unmanned Aircraft System (“UAS”

or “SD02”), seeks an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) discussed later in this section.

The requested exemption would permit commercial operation of IA’s SD02, which weighs 5.5lbs to 23.5 lbs

(based on variable installed sensors) and performs precisio n aerial surveys that consist of still photographs

and moving images taken by onboard cameras. The SD02 takes a series of high quality, still digital images that

are used to pro vide inspection data for evaluation by a client . Applications for these UAS dev ices and

associated data processing functions include agriculture, power utility , and professional surveying. Use of the

SD02 for aerial inspections and data gathering reduces the need to operate conventional aircraft for the same

purpose , reduces risk to personnel, and provides very high quality imagery at a fraction of the cost of

inspections and surveys using conventional aircraft. These savings result in enhanced efficiency and

productivity for the affected activities, as well as environmental benefits and safety risk reductions

. 1 Operations

under the exemption will be subject to strict operating requirements and conditions to ensure at least an

equivalent level of safety to currently authorized operations using manned aircraft and under conditions as m ay

be modified by the FAA as required by Section 333.

As described more fully below, the requested exemption would authorize commercial operations of aerial

surveys and inspections using the SD02, which at up to 22.5 lbs. is small in size.

The SD02 will be operated under controlled conditions at low altitude in airspace that is limited in scope, as

described more fully herein; it will have automated control features, as described below. The SD02 also will be

operated by an individual who has passed an FAA approved t raining exam , certifications and a required

manufacturer’s training program for the UAS.

Finally, the a irspace in which the UAS will operate will be Class E or Class G, under 400’, over privately

owned, owner authorized land.

IA respectfully submits that because this small, unmanned aerial vehicle

— the SD02

— will be used in lieu of

comparatively hazardous o perations now conducted with fixed wing

, and rotary conventional aircraft, the FAA

can have confidence that the operations will achieve at least an equivalent level or greater level of safety.

Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and ful fill the Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA

Administrator’s) responsibilities under Section 333(c) of the Reform Act to “establish requirements for the safe

operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.”

The name and address of the applicant are:

Industrial Aerobotics LLC

Ph: 951

- 527

- 7544

Email: legal @industrialaerobotics.com

Address: P.O. BOX 11034

Glendale, Arizona 853 18The regulations from which the exemption is requested are as follows:

• 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H2 Airworthiness Certificates & 14 C.F.R. §

91.203(a)(1).

• 14 C.F.R. Part 27: Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category Rotorcraft.

Aircraft Marking and Identification Requirements: 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.9(c),

45.23(b) and 45.27(a).

• 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b): P rivate Pilot Privileges and Limitations:

Pilot in Command.

• 14 C.F.R. § 91.9(b)(2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft.

• 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness.

• 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight Action.

• 14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a): Flight Instruction.

• 14 C.F.R. § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes.

• 14 C.F.R. § 91.121 Altimeter Settings.

• 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions.

• 14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) & (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and

Registration.

• 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); 91.417 (a) & (b):

Maintenance Inspections.THE APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARD UNDER SECTION 333

IA submits that grant of this exemption application for use of the SD02 in precision aerial surveys will advance

the Congressional mandate in Section 333 of the Reform Act to accelerate the introduction of UASs into the

national airspace system (“NAS”) if it can be accomplished safely. This law directs the Secretary of

Transp ortation to consider whether certain UASs may operate safely in the NAS before completion of the

rulemaking required under Section 332 of the Reform Act. In making this determination, the Secretary is

required to determine which types of UASs do not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public or pose a

threat to national security in light of the following:

• The UAS’s size, weight, speed, and operational capability;

• Operation of the UAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas; and

• O peration of the UAS within visual line of sight of the operator.

Reform Act § 333(a)(1). If the Secretary determines that such vehicles “may operate safely in the national

airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft in the

national airspace system.” Id. §333(c)

IA submits that this provision places a duty on the Administrator to not only process applications for

exemptions under Section 333, but for the Administrator, if he deems the conditions prop osed herein require

modification in order to allow approval, to supply conditions for the safe operation of the UAS. IA welcomes the

opportunity to consult with FAA staff in order to address any issues or concerns that this proposal may raise

that they bel ieve may require modification.

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. This statutory authority,

by its terms, includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined under §40101 of the Act, from the

requirement that all civil aircraft mus t have a current airworthiness certificate and those regulations requiring

commercial pilots to operate aircraft in commercial service:

The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement of a regulation prescribed under

subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any of sections

- 4

– 44702

- 44716 of this title if the Administrator

finds the exemption is in the public interest.

49 U.S.C. §44701(f). See also 49 USC §44711(a); 49 USC §44704; 14 CFR §91.203(a)(1).

The grant of the requested exemptio n is in the public interest based on the clear direction in Section 333 of the

Reform Act; the additional authority in the Federal Aviation Act, as amended; the strong equivalent level of

safety surrounding the proposed operations; and the significant publ ic benefit, including enhanced safety and

cost savings associated with transitioning to UASs for aerial survey photography. Accordingly, the applicant

respectfully requests that the FAA grant the requested exemption without delay.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED OPERATIONS

The available SD02 Manual describes, in detail, the policies and procedures for Petitioner's

proposed sUAS operations. To assist the FAA in its safety assessment of Petitioner's proposed

sUAS operations, below is a summary of operational lim itations and conditions which will

ensure an equivalent or higher level of safety to operations conducted under current regulatory

guidelines:

1. The sUAS will weigh less than 26 lbs.

2. Flights will be operated within line

- of

- sight of a pilot and obs erver.

3. Flights will be terminated at 25% power reserve

.4. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level

("AGL").

5. Minimum crew for each operation will consist of the sUAS Pilot and an Observer.

6. The sUAS pilot will be an FAA licensed airman with a private and/or commercial pilot's

certificate with rotorcraft rating.

7. The sUAS pilot will be Pilot in Command (PIC). If a pilot certificate holder other than

the sUAS Pilot is present and possesses the necessary PIC qualifications, that person can

also be designated as PIC.

8. The UAS will only operate within a confined "Sterile Area" as defined in the Manual.8

9. A briefing will be conducted in regard to the p lanned sUAS operations prior to each day's

activities. It will be mandatory that all personnel who will be performing duties within

the boundaries of the safety perimeter be present for this briefing.

10. Pilot and Observer will have been trained in ope ration of UAS generally and will have

received up

- to

- date information on the particular UAS to be operated, as required in the

Manual.

11. Observer and Pilot will at all times be able to communicate by voice and/or text.

12. Written and/or oral permiss ion from the relevant property holders will be obtained.

13. All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or

city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate governmental agencies.

1 4. If the sUAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the sUAS is equipped with advanced safety

features that will allow the sUAS to automatically return to a pre

- determined safe location.

15. The sUAS will have the capability to abort a flight in case of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

REGULATIONS FROM WHICH EXEMPTION IS REQUESTED

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions.

By its terms, this statutory authority includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined

under §40101 of the Act, including sUASs, from its safety regulations and minimum standards

when the Administrator decides a requested exemption is in the pu blic interest.

Petitioner seeks an exemption from several interrelated provisions of 14 C.F.R. Parts 21,

45 and 91 for purposes of conducting aerial surveys and inspections using sUAS. Listed below

are:

(1) the specific sections of 14 C.F.R. for which exemption is sought; and

(2) the operating procedures and safeguards that Petitioner has established which will ensure a level of

safety equal to or better than the rules from which exemption is sought.

A. 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H2Airworthiness Certi ficates & 14 C.F.R. §

91.203(a)(1).

This petition seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, which establishes

the procedural requirements for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by 14

C.F.R. §91.203(a)(1). Given the size a nd limited operating area associated with the sUAS to be

utilized by the Petitioner, an exemption from Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of an

equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 of the Reform Act.The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§ 44701(f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act both

authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness certificate, upon

consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, and proximity to airports and

populated areas of the particular UAS.

In all cases, an analysis of these criteria demonstrates that the sUAS operated without an

airworthiness certificate, in the restricted environment and under the conditions proposed will be

at least as safe, or s afer, than a conventional rotorcraft operating with an airworthiness certificate

without the restrictions and conditions of the proposed sUAS operations.

Equivalent Level of Safety

The sUAS to be operated hereunder is less than 26 lbs. fully loaded, carries neither a pilot

nor passenger, carries no explosiv e materials , and operates exclusively

within a secured area as set out in the Manual. Unlike other civil aircraft, the proposed

operations in this petition for exemption will be controlled and monitored by the operator,

pursuant to the Manual's requirements. Moreover, the FAA will have advance notice of all

operations conducted under this exemption.

These safety enhancements, which already apply to civil aircraft operated in connection

with existing inspection operations, provide a greater degree of safety to the public and property

owners than conventional operations conducted with airworthiness certificates issued under 14

C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Lastly, application o f these same criteria demonstrates that there is no

credible threat to national security posed by the sUAS, due to its size, speed of operation,

location of operati on, lack of explosive materials, and inability to carry

a substantial external load.

B. 14 C.F.R. Part 27: Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category Rotorcraft.

14 C.F.R. Part 27 sets forth the procedural requirements for airworthiness certification of

normal category rotorcraft. To the extent the Petitioner's sUASs would otherwise require

certification under Part 27, as a rotorcraft, Petitioner requests an exemption from Part 27’s

airworthiness standards for the same reasons identified in the exemption request from 14 C.F.R.

Part 21, Subpart H.

C. Aircraft Marking and Identification Req uirements: 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.9(c),

45.23(b) and 45.27(a).

This petition seeks an exemption from the aircraft marking and identification

requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.9(c), 45.23(b) and 45.27(a).

14 C.F.R. § 91.9(c), Civil aircraft flight manual, marking, and placard requirements,

provides that:

No person may operate a U.S.

- registered civil aircraft unless that aircraft is

identified in accordance with part 45 of this chapter.

14 C.F.R. § 45.2 3(b), Markings of the Aircraft, states:

When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the registration

number is displayed on limited, restricted or light

- sport category aircraft or

experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the ope rator must also display

on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters

not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, the words "limited,"

"restricted," "light

- sport," "experimental," or "provisional," as ap plicable.14 C.F.R. § 45.27(a), Rotorcraft, states:

Each operator of a rotorcraft must display on that rotorcraft horizontally on both

surfaces of the cabin, fuselage, boom, or tail the marks required by §45.23.

Exemption from § 45.23(b) is warranted because the sUAV has no entrance to the cabin,

cockpit, or pilot station on which the word "Experimental" can be placed. Moreover, given the

size of the sUAV, two

- inch lettering would be impossible. The word "Experi mental" will be

placed on the fuselage in compliance with § 45.29(f).

Given the nature of the specific relief sought by this exemption request, Petitioner

requires relief from the associated marking and identification requirements of § 45.27(a) and §

9 1.9(c), which would require compliance with § 45.23(b).

Equivalent Level of Safety

An equivalent level of safety for exemptions to the aircraft marking and identification

requirements of §§ 91.9(c), 45.23(b) and 45.27(a), will be provided by having the sUAV marked

on its fuselage as required by §45.29(f) where the pilot, observer, and others working with the

sUAV will see the identification of the UAS as "Experimental." Additionally, Petitioner will

ensure compliance with any requests of sUAS marking by the FAA.

The FAA has issued the following exemptions to the aircraft marking requirements of §

45.23(b): Exemptions Nos. 10700, 8738, 10167 and 10167A.

D. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b): Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot

in Command.

This petition seeks an exemption from the private pilot privileges and limitations of §

61.113 (a) & (b), which states:

Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in Command.

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (h) of this section, no

person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as pilot in command of an

aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may

that person, for compensation or hire, act as pilot in command of an aircraft.

(b) A priv ate pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as pilot in command

of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if:

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or propert y for compensation or

hire.

Section 61.113(a) limits private pilots to being in command of non

- commercial flights.

Section 61.113(b)(1) provides an exception that allows a private pilot to command an aircraft

without passengers or property, in connect ion with business or employment if "[t]the flight is

only incidental to that business or employment." That exception likely does not apply to the

proposed operations under this petition for exemption, as the flights are not incidental to the

proposed ae rial surveys and inspections but rather essential to it. Accordingly, this petition seeks

an exemption to § 61.113(a)'s commercial limitation and/or § 61.113(b)(1)'s requirement that the

flight be incidental to the business to benefit from the exception.Equivalent Level of Safety

As required by the Manual, Petitioner's sUAS operators acting as PIC will hold a

commercial and/or private pilot certification and have a rotorcraft rating. Because the sUAS

will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the equivalent level of

safety to § 61.113 (a) and (b), by requiring the PIC operating the sUAS to have either a

commercial and/or private pilot certification with rotorcraft rating.

Unlike a conventional aircraft that carries the pilot and passengers, the sUAS is remotely

controlled with no living thing on board. Moreover, the area of operation is controlled and

restricted, and all flights are planned and coordinated in advance as set forth in the Manual.

The level of safety provided by the requirements included in the Manual exceeds that

provided by a single individual holding a commercial pilot's certificate operating a conventional

aircraft in accordance with § 61.113 (a) & (b ). The risks associated with the operation of small,

lightweight UAS are diminished from the level of risk associated with commercial operations

contemplated by Part 61 when drafted, that allowing the proposed operations in this petition for

exemption w ith a private pilot as the PIC exceeds the present level of safety achieved by §

61.113 (a) & (b).

**E. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9(b)(2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft.**

This petition seeks an exemption from the flight manual requirements of 14 C.F.R. §

91.9(b)(2), which states:

(b) No person may operate a U.S.

- registered civil aircraft

(2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by

§21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved airplane or Rotorcraft Flight

Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof.

Given its size, configuration, and load capacity, the sUAS has no ability to carry such a

manual on the aircraft, not only because there i s no pilot on board, but because there is simply no

room or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft.

Equivalent Level of Safety

The safety related purpose of this manual requirement can be equally satisfied by

maintaining the sUAS flight manual at the ground control point where the pilot flying the sUAS

will have immediate access to it. Accordingly, Petitioner requests an exemption from §

91.9(b)(2)'s flight manual requirements, on the condition that the sUAS flight manu al be

available at the control point during each operation.

The FAA has issued the following exemptions to this regulation: Exemption Nos. 8607,

8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602, 32827, and 10700.

**F. 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness.** 

This petition seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a), which requires that a civil

aircraft be in an airworthy condition to be operated. Inasmuch there will be no airworthiness

certificate issued for the sUAS, should this ex emption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard

will exist for determining airworthiness.Equivalent Level of Safety

IA pilots that will be flying the sUAS have over 12,000 flight hours and a stellar safety record. Given the size of

the sUAS and the requirements contained in the Manual for maintenance and use of safety checklists prior to

each flight, an equivalent level o f safety will be provided.

The FAA has issued the following exemptions to this regulation: Exemption Nos. 8607,

8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602, 32827, and 10700.

G. 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight Action

This petition seeks an exemption from m § 91.103, which requires a PIC to become familiar with specific

information before each flight, including information contained in the FAA

- approved Flight Manual on board

the aircraft. Inasmuch as an FAA approved flight manual will not be provided for the sUAS, an exemption will

be needed.

Equivalent Level of Safety

An equivalent level of safety will be provided by following the Aircraft Operations Manual comprehensive

preflight checklist. The PIC will take all actions, including reviewing weather, flight battery requirements,

landing and takeoff distances, and aircraft performance data, before initiation of flight.

**H. 14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a): Flight Instruction.**

This petition seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a), which pr ovides that “[n]o person may operate a

civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully

functioning dual controls.” sUASs and remotely piloted aircraft, by their design do not have fully functional dual

controls. Instead, flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates with the

sUAS via radio communications.

Equivalent Level of Safety

Given the size and speed of the sUAS, an equivalent level of safe tr aining can still be performed without dual

controls because no pilot or passengers are aboard the sUAS, and all persons will be a safe distance away

should the sUAS experience any difficulties during flight instruction.

The FAA has approved exemptions fo r flight training without fully functional dual controls for a number of

aircraft and for flight instruction in experimental aircraft. See Exemption Nos. 5778K & 9862A.

I. 14 C.F.R. § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes.

This petition seeks an exemption from the minimum safe altitude requirements of 14

C.F.R. § 91.119. Section 91.119 prescribes the minimum safe altitudes under which aircraft may

not operate, including 500 feet above the surface and away from any person, vessel, vehicle, or

structure in non

- congested areas. See 14 C.F.R. § 91.119(c). Section § 91.119(d)(1) allows for a helicopter to

operate at less than those minimum altitudes when it can be operated “without hazard to persons or property

on the surface,” provided that “each person op erating the helicopter complies with any routes or altitudes

specifically prescribed for helicopters by the FAA

To provide the intended inspections, the sUAS will normally need to be operated within a

range of approximately 50 feet from the utility

- power generation line being inspected.

Accordingly, due to the nature of the proposed operations, the PIC and the designated spotter

may at times be less than 500 feet away from structures during the operation, a nd an exemption

is therefore required.Equivalent Level of Safety

Compared to flight operations with rotorcraft weight ing far more than the maximum 26

lbs. proposed herein, any risk associated with these operations is far less than those presently pre sented with

conventional aircraft. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed of the UAS as

well as the location where it is operated. As set forth in the Manual, the sUAS will be operated in a restricted

area, where build ings and people will not be exposed to operations witho ut their pre

- obtained consent. No

flight will be taken without the permission of the property owner and/or local officials. Because of the advance

notice to the property owner and participants, all af fected individuals will be aware of the planned flight

operations as set forth in the Manual. Furthermore, by operating at such lower altitudes, the sUAS will not

interfere with other aircraft that are subject to the minimum safe altitude regulations.

J. 14 C.F.R. § 91.121 Altimeter Settings.

This petition seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.121, which requires a person

operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude or flight level by reference to an altimeter that

is set to the elevation of th e departure airport or barometric pressure. An exemption is required

because the sUAS does not have a barometric altimeter, but rather a GPS altitude read out.

Equivalent Level of Safety

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by following the procedures set forth in the

Manual. As prescribed in the Manual, the operator will confirm the altitude of the launch site

shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight. Moreover, the PIC will use the GPS altitude

indicator to constantly monitor the sUASs height, thus ensuring operation at safe altitudes.

K. 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in V FR Conditions.

This petition seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a)'s fuel requirements for

flight in VFR conditions. Section 91.151 states:

(a) No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless

(considering wind and forecast weather cond itions) there is enough fuel to fly to

the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed

(1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or

(2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes.

The powering source for the sUAS provides approximately 25 minutes of powered flight.

An exemption from the 30 minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR §91.151 is therefore required.

Equivalent Level of Safety

An equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to 25% of battery power, whichever happens

first. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the sUAS to its planned landing zone from

anywhere within its limited operating area. Operation of the sUAS with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel

does not engender the type of risks that Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed

of the small UAS. Moreover, operation will be limited to controlled areas where only people and property

owners, or official representatives who have sign ed waivers will be allowed.

This request for exemption falls within the scope of prior exemptions. See e.g. Exemption

10673 (allowing Lockheed Martin Corporation to operate without compliance with § 91.151 (a));

see also Exemptions 2689F, 5745, 10673, a nd 10808.L. 14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) & (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and

Registration.

This petition seeks an exemption from civil aircraft certification and registration

requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) and (b). The regulation provides in pertinent part:

(a) Except as provided in §91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it

has within it the following:

(1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate«

(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate

required by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued

under §91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to

passenger s or crew.

In addition to the fact that Petitioner is seeking an exemption from the airworthiness certificate requirements,

an exemption to this regulation is necessary because (a) the sUAS’s load capacity and size does not allow it to

carry certificatio n and registration documents; (2) the sUAS does not have a cabin or cockpit entrance at which

the documents could be displayed; and (3) there are no passengers or crew for whom the certificates need be

displayed.

Equivalent Level of Safety

To the extent these regulations are applicable to the proposed sUAS operations, an

equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping these documents at the ground control

point where the pilot flying the sUAS will have immediate access to them.

Th e FAA has issued numerous exemptions to this regulation. A representative sample of

other exceptions includes Exemption Nos. 9565, 9665, 9789, 9789A, 9797, 9797A, 9816A, and

10700.

M. 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); 91.417 (a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections.

This petition seeks an exemption from the maintenance inspection requirements of 14

C.F.R. §§ 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); 91.417 (a) & (b). These regulations specify

maintenance and inspection standards in reference to 14 C.F.R. Part 43. See, e.g., 14 C.F.R. §

91.405(a) (stating that each owner or operator of an aircraft “[s]hall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in

subpart E of this part and shall between required insp ections . . . have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in

part 43 of this chapter”). An exemption to these regulations is needed because Part 43 and these sections

apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, which the sUAS will not have.

Eq uivalent Level of Safety

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because maintenance and inspections will

be performed in accordance with the Aircraft Operations Manual as referenced in the available Manual.

As provided in the Manual, the operato r will ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight,

perform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. The operator is the person most

familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the

equivalent level of safety.

If mechanical issues arise, the UAS can land immediately and will be operating from no higher than 400 feet

AGL. Moreover, the UAS's small size, carrying capacity, and the fact that flight ope rations will only take place

in restricted areas for limited periods of time, create less risk than the same factors associated with

conventional fixed

- wing aircraft and rotorcraft performing the same operation.PUBLIC INTEREST

Consistent with the requirements of 14 C.F.R. §11.81(d), Petitioner offers the following

reasons why granting this petition for exemption is in the public interest, i.e., how granting it

would benefit the public as a whole.

Approval of exemptions allow ing commercial operations of small and lightweight sUAS

in the utility aerial services industry benefits the public as a whole in the following ways:

• It helps fulfill Congress' goal in passing Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform

Act, namely, the FAA Administrator's assessment of whether certain UAS may

operate safely in the National Airspace System before completion of the rulemaking

required under Section 332 of the Reform Act.

• The operation significantly improves safety and reduces risk by alleviating human

exposure to danger associated with current aerial survey and inspection methods,

namely, full size helicopters. Manned helicopters performing utility

- power generation

inspe ctions and patrols have experienced an exceedingly high number of accidents

and fatalities. The public's interest is furthered by reducing human exposure to death

or serious injury associated with manned aircraft performing utility

- power generation

insp ections and patrols.

• Petitioner's sUASs are battery powered and create no emissions. If Petitioner's sUAS

crashes, there is no fuel to ignite and explode. Any impact of Petitioner's lightweight

sUASs is, obviously, far less than a full size helicopter. The public's interest is

furthered by minimizing ecological impact of an accident and by reducing human

exposure to potentially harmful emissions associated with manned aircraft.

• Aerial surveys are valuable tools for utility

- power generation inspection s. However,

problems with safety, cost, statistical integrity, and logistics continue to impede aerial

surveys and inspections from conventional manned aircraft. The use of sUAS

addresses these problems and is a powerful tool for performing a wide

- range of

utility

- power generation inspection and patrol applications. The public as a whole

will benefit from the safer and more cost

- effective utility aerial services that sUAS

operations pro vide.

PRIVACY

All flights will occur over Petitioner's property or the Utility Customer's property with the

Utility Customer's prior consent and knowledge.FEDERAL REGISTAR SUMMARY

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the

FEDERAL REGISTER, should it be determined that publication is needed:

Industrial Aerobotics

, LLC . seeks an exemption from the following rules:

14 CFR Part 21, Subpar t H; 14 CFR Part 27; 14 CFR 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) &

(b); 14 CFR 91.7(a); 14 CFR 91.9(b)(2); 14 CFR 91.103; 14 CFR 91.109(a); 14 CFR 91.119; 14

CFR 91.121; 14 CFR 91.151(a); 14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b); 14 CFR 91.405(a); 14 CFR

91.407(a)(1); 14 CF R 91.409(a)(2); 14 CFR 91.417 (a) & (b).

Approval of exemptions will allow commercial operations of small and lightweight unmanned aircraft ("sUAS")

in the utility

- power inspection industry will enhance safety by reducing risk. Conventional operations in this

industry using manned operations, rotorcraft or fixed

- wing aircraft present the risks associated with vehicles

that weigh in the neighborhood of several thousand pounds and carrying large amounts of fuel. Such aircraft

must fly to and from the survey or inspection location and operate at l ow altitudes.

In contrast, a sUAS weighing fewer than 26 lbs. and powered by batteries eliminates virtually all of that risk,

given the reduced mass and lack of combustible fuel carried on board. The sUAS is transported, not flow n , to

the designated surv ey area and set up. The sUAS carries no passengers or crew and, therefore, does not

expose them to the risks associated with manned aircraft flights.

The operation of small UASs, weighting less than 26 lbs., provides an equivalent level of safety and thus

supports the grant of the exemptions requested herein, including exempting the applicant from the

requirements of Part 21 and allowing commercial operations. These lightweight sUASs operate at slow

speeds, close to the ground, and in a sterile environment . As a result, they are far safer than conventional

aerial survey and inspection operations conducted with fixed

- wing aircraft or helicopters.

CONCLUSION

Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Sectio n 333 of the Reform Act of 2012

- size,

weight, spee d, operating capabilities, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation

within visual line of sight and national security2provides more than adequate justification for

the grant of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of Ind ustrial Aerobotics, LLC sUAS in the

utility

- power transmission inspection and patrol industry in accordance with the available Manual

If additional information is required, or if you have any questions regarding this Petition

for Exemption, please contact the undersigned at:

Industrial Aerobotics, LLS

Phone: 951

- 527

- 7544

Email: legal @ industrialaerobotics.com

Very truly yours,

John J. Wolcott