alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5250 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5250

  To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1,6-Hexanediol-dimethyl 
                          carbonate copolymer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1,6-Hexanediol-dimethyl 
                          carbonate copolymer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,6-HEXANEDIOL-DIMETHYL CARBONATE COPOLYMER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1,6-Hexanediol-     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          dimethyl                                                          12/31/2015
                          carbonate
                          copolymer (CAS
                          No. 126773-01-1)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3907.99.01)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### MITCHELL v. STATE.

No. 27072.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 23, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $350.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

*377The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

No motion for rehearing will be entertained and mandate will issue forthwith.

Opinion approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5473 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5473

 To suspend temporarily the duty on frit rings composed of dysprosium 
              oxide, dysprosium monosilicate, and mullite.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on frit rings composed of dysprosium 
              oxide, dysprosium monosilicate, and mullite.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FRIT RINGS COMPOSED OF DYSPROSIUM OXIDE, DYSPROSIUM 
              MONOSILICATE, AND MULLITE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Frit rings          Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          composed of                                                       12/31/2015
                          dysprosium oxide,
                          dysprosium
                          monosilicate, and
                          mullite (CAS Nos.
                          12161-58-9, 235-
                          295-7, 1302-93-8,
                          215-113-2, 1308-
                          87-8, and 215-164-
                          0) (provided for
                          in sub-heading
                          8539.90.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1:20-MJ-131-ML

Case 1:20-mj-00131-ML Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 1 of 4
1:20-MJ-131-ML

Case 1:20-mj-00131-ML Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:20-mj-00131-ML Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:20-mj-00131-ML Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 4 of 4
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5191 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5191

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mechanics' work gloves.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. McKeon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mechanics' work gloves.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MECHANICS' WORK GLOVES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) by striking heading 9902.14.03; and
            (2) by inserting in numerical sequence the following new 
        heading:

``     9902.14.03        Mechanics' work     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          gloves, valued                                                    12/31/2015
                          over $3.65 per
                          pair but not over
                          $5.58 per pair
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          6216.00.58)......

    (b) Amendment to U.S. Note.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 is amended 
by striking existing U.S. Note 18 to such subchapter and by inserting 
in such subchapter the following new U.S. Note:
    ``18. For purposes of heading 9902.14.03, the term `mechanics' work 
gloves' means gloves having the following characteristics: imitation 
leather palms and fingers with fourchettes; backs comprising either one 
layer of synthetic knitted fabric or three layers with the outer layer 
of synthetic knitted fabric, the center layer of foam and the inner 
layer of tricot fabric.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 18, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00430

- CR

San Juan GARCIA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227 th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR3674

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Carol N. Castillo ’ s notification of late record is hereby GRANTED. The reporter ’ s record

is due on or before October 24, 2017.

________________ _________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of September, 2017

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

APPLIANCE COMPUTING III, INC.

d/b/a SUREFIELD,

Plaintiff,

v.

REDFIN CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 6:20-cv-00376-ADA

ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO AMEND/CORRECT ORDER ON JOINT MOTION 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (DKT. 260)

Before the Court is Plaintiff Appliance Computing III, Inc. d/b/a Surefield’s and 

Defendant Redfin Corporation’s Joint Motion to Amend/Correct Order (Dkt. 260) on Joint 

Motion for Extension of Time (the “Motion”). Having reviewed the Motion and finding good 

cause exists, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the dates reflected in Dkt. 260 be amended as 

follows: 

Current Deadline Further Amended 

Deadline

Event

September 29, 2022 October 3, 2022 Deadline by which to file Rule CV-54.a.3 

motion.

September 29, 2022 October 3, 2022 Earliest date by which the clerk may tax 

costs if no motion is filed by this date. See 

Rule CV-54.a.4. (“The clerk shall not tax 

costs until the expiration of 21 days after 

the filing of the proposed bill of costs. If 

no motion is filed in that time period, the 

clerk shall proceed to tax costs.”) 

Case 6:20-cv-00376-ADA Document 263-1 Filed 10/03/22 Page 1 of 2
3

October 6, 2022 October 10, 2022 Date by which costs will be deemed taxed 

as proposed if bill of cost is uncontested 

and if clerk fails to tax costs by this date. 

See Rule CV-54.a.4 (“In a case involving 

an uncontested bill of costs, if the clerk 

fails to tax costs within 28 days after the 

proposed bill of costs is filed, costs will be 

deemed taxed as proposed.”)

ORDERED this ______ day of ________________, 2022. 

____________________________________

ALAN D. ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00376-ADA Document 263-1 Filed 10/03/22 Page 2 of 2
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

EL CAMPO VENTURES, LLC, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 1:20-CV-560-RP

§

STRATTON SECURITIES, INC., et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the Court is the amended report and recommendation1 of United States Magistrate 

Judge Mark Lane concerning Plaintiff El Campo Ventures, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for 

Attorneys’ Fees, Prejudgment Interest, Post-Judgment Interest and Costs, (Dkt. 113), and related 

briefing, (Dkts. 116, 117, 128, 129). (Am. R. & R., Dkt. 131). In addition to taking supplemental 

briefing, Judge Lane also had two hearings on Plaintiff’s motion. (Minute Entries, Dkts. 124, 127). 

In his report and recommendation, Judge Lane recommends that the Court grant in part and deny in 

part the motion. (Id. at 13). Plaintiff and Defendant both timely filed objections to the report and 

recommendation. (Objs., Dkt. 132, 133). 

A party may serve and file specific, written objections to a magistrate judge’s findings and 

recommendations within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report and 

recommendation and, in doing so, secure de novo review by the district court. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(C). Because the parties timely objected to the report and recommendation, the Court

reviews the report and recommendation de novo. Having done so, the Court overrules the parties’

objections and adopts the report and recommendation as its own order.

1 The amended report and recommendation corrected a typo in the post-judgment interest rate in the original report 

and recommendation. (Am. R. & R., Dkt. 131, at 1).
2

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the amended report and recommendation of United 

States Magistrate Judge Mark Lane, (Dkt. 131), is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ 

Fees, Prejudgment Interest, Post-Judgment Interest and Costs, (Dkt. 113), is GRANTED IN 

PART and DENIED IN PART. 

Accordingly, the Court awards to Plaintiff:

A. Attorney’s Fees in the in the amount of $358,980.00.

B. Prejudgment Interest in the amount of $369,699.00.

C. Post-Judgment Interest at the rate of 0.08%.

D. Costs in the amount of $14,472.49.

SIGNED on August 23, 2022.

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 12



                  SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        Computation of Ratios of Earnings
                   from Continuing Operations to Fixed Charges
                              Total Enterprise (a)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        Three Months Ended March 31,                        Years Ended December 31,


                                            1998           1997            1997        1996         1995         1994        1993
                                            ----           ----            ----        ----         ----         ----        ----

                                                                                               (In Thousands)

Earnings from Continuing Operations:
<S>                                       <C>            <C>            <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>     
   Income before income taxes             $55,156        $46,625        $171,503    $150,219     $134,124     $ 76,098    $127,618
   Fixed charges (see computation below)   10,230          8,379          34,785      43,028       48,779       47,576      58,250
                                          -------        -------        --------    --------     --------     --------    --------
Total Earnings Available for Fixed 
   Charges                                $65,386        $55,004        $206,288    $193,247     $182,903     $123,674    $185,868
                                          =======        =======        ========    ========     ========     ========    ========


Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense before deducting
      interest capitalized                $ 9,698        $ 8,019        $ 33,130    $ 41,147     $ 46,859     $ 45,900    $ 56,600
   Rentals(b)                                 532            360           1,655       1,881        1,920        1,676       1,650
                                          -------        -------        --------    --------     --------     --------    --------
                                          $10,230        $ 8,379        $ 34,785    $ 43,028     $ 48,779     $ 47,576    $ 58,250
                                          =======        =======        ========    ========     ========     ========    ========


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges            6.4            6.6             5.9         4.5          3.7          2.6         3.2
                                          =======        =======        ========    ========     ========     ========    ========
</TABLE>




----------------

(a)  Amounts  include the  Company's  portion of the  captions as they relate to
     persons accounted for by the equity method.

(b)  These  amounts  represent  1/3 of rentals  which  approximate  the interest
     factor  applicable to such rentals of the Company and its  subsidiaries and
     continuing unconsolidated affiliates.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

DROPBOX INC

vs.

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, MOTION

OFFENSE, LLC, DROPBOX INC

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00251-ADA

ORDER RESETTING ZOOM POST-TRIAL MOTIONS HEARING 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is reset for

ZOOM POST-TRIAL MOTIONS HEARING by Zoom on January 03, 2024 at 04:00 PM . 

 IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of December, 2023.

______________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 423 Filed 12/26/23 Page 1 of 1
#### HEBERT et al. v. STATE.

No. 26236

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 18, 1953.

Martin & Shown, by W. E. Martin, Houston, for appellants.

William H. Scott, Crim. Dist. Atty., and King C. Haynie, Asst. -Crim. Dist.' Atty., Houston, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

-WOODLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a bond forfeiture.

The state moves to dismiss the appeal because brief for appellants' was not filed within the time provided by law. Under the provisions of Art. 866, C.C.P. and Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 414, appellants’ brief should have been filed within thirty days after the filing of the transcript in this court.

The transcript wás filed on December 22, 1952, and the only brief filed by appellants wás filed on February 10, 1953, the day .prior to the submission of the appeal.

Appellants made no request for .extension of time for filing their brief, and good cause has not been shown for failure to file same within the time allowed by law.

Under the authority of Gaither v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 244 S.W.2d 209, and cases cited therein, the state’s motion to dismiss is well taken. ,.

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Standard Motor Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
J. Burke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/S/ JAMES J. BURKE
--------------------------
James J. Burke
Chief Financial Officer
August 6, 2008


* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Standard Motor Products, Inc. and will be retained by Standard Motor
Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November                2, 2007                 |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                             |   |
|  /s/Jimmy                E. Addison                         |   |
| Jimmy                E. Addison                                  |   |
| Senior                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5207 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5207

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain PCBTF with antistatic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Mulvaney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain PCBTF with antistatic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PCBTF WITH ANTISTATIC.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1-Chloro-4-         Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (trifluoromethyl)                                                 12/31/2015
                          benzene (CAS No.
                          98-56-6)
                          containing an
                          antistatic
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3824.90.92)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 4, 2011 

0427 

Order 

 

May 4, 2011 

142266 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142266 

 COA: 293239 

Kent CC: 09-001677-FH 

CHARLES DAVID POST, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 19, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Order entered November 12, 2012



### fiftb In The 

## Court of Rppea1.5 i5tritt of Texa5 at alia5 No. 05-12-01158-CR CLAUDE CHARLES POWELL, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-62508-H



### ORDER We GRANT Official Court Reporter Crystal R. Jones's November 7, 2012 request for an extension of time to file the reporter's record to the extent the reporter's record shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order. 

# 721 LANA MYERS JUSTICE