alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5295 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5295

   To suspend temporarily the duty on Sodium Benzoate, ODR/FLV Comp.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Roe of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on Sodium Benzoate, ODR/FLV Comp.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SODIUM BENZOATE, ODR/FLV COMP.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Sodium benzoate     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (Benzoic acid,                                                    12/31/2015
                          sodium salt),
                          (CAS No. 532-32-
                          1) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2916.31.11)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
' i 

l 

• 

236 Airport Hangar Drive 

Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 

Phone/Fax 715-424-3737 ·J=?~~RTi,AENI OF 

· :f._:.:;sPOilfAT_IO, ·.i\l,l e-mait: wings@wctc.net 

: 'I c• r);J rl_ nr A r I()' J s website: http://www. wingsaircharter.com 

-~~~~~--~~-~~~.J.-4· ~· i__i. I - L \ ''.:____----~~~-~-----.---., 

Winas.Air_Charte;;~JLGR·~j '/:::)_. LL1J ;,t \ \ r;, 

v ___ p_ t=sz. ___ --~--------·-------- --~----.--.--J 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington DC 20590 

Pear Sirs; 

I am requesting an extension to FAA-2011-0938 which is our request for an Exemption. 

I received a postcard (copy enclosed) saying that I needed to request and extension. Please 

acce~t-thJs letter as my request. 

/

. '""c~ 

(

' .. ·.·.:.:. . ) ·' . <'' ., ) i \ .·· ! My 0ngtnal request was as follows: 

: ..~ We, '1-'ings AirChafter LLC, ~ir Carrier Certificate # W9SA686Y and LOA #WKGJGL 13, 

/would like to apply for a grant of exemption from Title 14, Part 120, to permit us, operating under 

(\'' 

:~e~arate parts of the regulations, to cover, with an equivalent level of safety, our safety-sensitive 

employees under one drug and alcohol testing program . 

. We are currentlycovered for both our 135 and our Air Tour programs by an approved FAA/DOT 

, drug a~d alcohol testing program, through a Consortiumfrhird Party Administrator: 

\ Professional Air Charter Services, Inc. ' \ ~........._ 

(progran])manager John Carpenter) 

Drug~A6atement I AMPP Consortium 

Kt(nsas City: MO 

816 942 2144 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

~~ Kurt Gross 

Manager 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
Date: 3/29/2013 ·------------·-----;--------------

Exemption No: 10354 from 14 CFR (FAR Section)-

Part:120 

will expire on 9/30/2013. If appropriate, please submit 

your request to extend this exemption (including the 

docket number FAA-2011-0938) within 30 days of the 

date of this notice. Otherwise, the FAA may not be able 

to process your request for extension befoie the 

expiration date. You may either submit your request 

electronically through the internet using the Doc!<et 

Management System web site at: 

http://Regulations.gov/ or mail your request to: 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Submission to other locations may delay piOcessing. 

Any request for extension must meet the 

requirements of 14 CFR part 11. If you have already 

requested an extension for this exemption .or no longer 

need this exemption, please igr.ore this notice. 

~/,.r.c.,· r.~ ',. -;., _y· :. 0""l6!-~2-:.E<Z2.C?'": 

~(~~~,"~; r, " -c' n 

~l~!~~t~:~~i 04iDii2ui3 

t,'j:~i(ort;R.r'Gross r.1r.;;;.;o From 20591 

i::~ W}f;g_~:;Alr Charter,tL:~C f;•O 37' tl.GC:: 

236 Airport Hangar Drive 

Wisconsin Rapids, WI 

54494 

p 1 ji ,,iii/i1j1ji ;j i' ''Jii//ii Iii jjj;iu'Jliiii, !lj1.j1Ji1j 'liJ,,i
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 194 (Thursday, October 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25608]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-04129]


Imaging Technologies, Inc., Cookeville, TN; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act and in accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, 
Chapter 2, Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 
2331), an investigation was initiated on August 28, 2000, on behalf of 
workers at Imaging Technologies Inc., Cookeville, Tennessee.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 26th day of September, 2000.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-25608 Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 31.2



SPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, William M. Shockley, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of SPS Technologies, Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SPS Technologies, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	[Omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: August 4, 2003              /s/ William M. Shockley                                  William M. Shockley
                                  Vice President and Chief Financial                                   Officer
Exhibit 

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 50-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 50-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 50-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 3 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 50-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 4 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 50-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 5 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 50-4 Filed 01/29/21 Page 6 of 6
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCEREPORT**

** **

I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. BankTrust National Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate BackedTrust Certificates, AIG Debenture-Backed Series 2002-10 Trust****(the “Trust”), certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kin respect of the Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporationin respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report of theTrust;

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, the information inthose reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the distributioninformation required to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholdersby the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement forinclusion in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

 

4.              I am responsible for reviewing theactivities performed by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similaragreement and based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, theTrustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

 

 

Date:  July 20, 2009

 

 
| /s/ David Kolibachuk                 |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| David J. Kolibachuk,  Vice President |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 542 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 542

 To eliminate the learned intermediary defense to tort claims based on 
               product liability, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2011

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To eliminate the learned intermediary defense to tort claims based on 
               product liability, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consumer Protection Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. LEARNED INTERMEDIARY DEFENSE.

    (a) In General.--It shall not be a defense to any tort claim in any 
court in the United States that a manufacture of a product has 
fulfilled that manufacturer's duty of care when the manufacturer 
provides all of the necessary information to a learned intermediary who 
then interacts with the consumer of the product.
    (b) Definition.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``learned intermediary'' means a person, 
        licenced under applicable State or Federal law, to advise a 
        consumer whether or not to use the product in question; and
            (2) the term ``State'' includes the District of Columbia, 
        Puerto Rico, and any other commonwealth, possession, or 
        territory of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATIONSPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of StandardMicrosystems Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2007 of the Company fullycomplies, in all material respects, with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Dated: September 25, 2007 By: /s/ Steven J. Bilodeau                (signature)    Steven J. Bilodeau    Chairman of the Board, President and    Chief Executive Officer           By: /s/ David S. Smith                (signature)    David S. Smith    Senior Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer  
29
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 2-27 Filed 05/08/20 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



I, James A. Konrath, Chief Executive Officer of Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co. (the
Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                      |  |  |  |                         |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Dated: March 25, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ James A. Konrath   
|                      |  |  |  | James A. Konrath       
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co. and will be retained by Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 8
 CERTIFICATION
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND
SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
   1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Neil McMillanName:
    Neil McMillanTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND
SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
   1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Rick JohnsonName:
    Rick JohnsonTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer and
Vice President Finance
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-50623

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jose Angel Bonilla-Pineda, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CR-89-1

Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Jose Angel Bonilla-Pineda appeals his conviction and sentence for 

illegal reentry into the United States under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). 

For the first time on appeal, Bonilla-Pineda contends that the recidivism 

enhancement in § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it permits a sentence 

above the otherwise-applicable statutory maximum established by § 1326(a), 

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 28, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-50623 Document: 00516591500 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/28/2022
No. 22-50623

2

based on facts that are neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury 

beyond a reasonable doubt. While Bonilla-Pineda acknowledges this 

argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 

(1998), he nevertheless seeks to preserve it for possible Supreme Court 

review. In addition, Bonilla-Pineda has filed an unopposed motion for 

summary disposition.

This court has held that subsequent Supreme Court decisions such as 

Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 

U.S. 466 (2000), did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. 

Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019). Thus, Bonilla-Pineda is correct 

that his argument is foreclosed, and summary disposition is appropriate. See

Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

Bonilla-Pineda’s motion is GRANTED, and the district court’s 

judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-50623 Document: 00516591500 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/28/2022
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

2007 Infiniti G35X Motor Vehicle, VIN 

JNKBV61E17M708556, Appellant

No. 06-13-00057-CV v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 71st District Court of 

Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 11-

0038). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and 

Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED MARCH 13, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
120206.000001 4873-0310-0955.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION 

JONATHAN VILLAREAL, 

individually and derivatively on behalf of

ZROBLACK LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

JOHN SAENZ; MIGUEL VILLAREAL, 

JR.; and GUNN, LEE & CAVE, P.C., 

Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

No. 5:20-CV-00571-OG

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RECOVER ATTORNEYS’ FEES 

Before the Court is the Motion to Recover Attorneys’ Fees (the “Motion”) filed by 

Defendant John Saenz (“Saenz”). After considering the Motion, any responses or replies to the 

Motion, the arguments of counsel, if any, and all other matters properly before the Court, the Court 

believes that the Motion should be granted in its entirety. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Saenz is hereby awarded the sum of $161,606.00 in 

attorneys’ fees from and against Plaintiffs Jonathan Villareal (“Villareal”) and ZroBlack, LLC 

(“ZroBlack”), jointly and severally. 

SIGNED AND ENTERED this _____ day of __________________, 2022. 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

ORLANDO L. GARCIA 

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 86 Filed 04/14/22 Page 1 of 1
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 2-1 Filed 06/02/20 Page 1 of 1