alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59174-59175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25466]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and 
Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651; 80 Stat. 
897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether 
instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which 
the instruments shown below are intended to be used, are being 
manufactured in the United States.
    Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the 
regulations and

[[Page 59175]]

be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Applications may be 
examined between 8:30 A.M. and 5 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 00-030. Applicant: Central Institute for the Deaf, 
4560 Clayton Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110. Instrument: Electron 
Microscope, Model H-7500. Manufacturer: Hitachi, Japan. Intended Use: 
The instrument is intended to be used for studies of the biological 
ultrastructure of the nervous system during research regarding the 
development of the olivocochlear innervation based on procedures that 
represent a refinement in established techniques and methods developed 
specifically to address issues concerning this application. In 
addition, the instrument will be used for educational purposes for the 
training of graduate students, medical students, postdoctoral fellows 
and medical residents. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: 
September 13, 2000.
    Docket Number: 00-031. Applicant: University of Georgia, The 
Applied Genetics Technology Resource and Business Facility (AGTEC), 111 
Riverbend Road, Athens, GA 30602. Instrument: (Two) Plant Growth 
Chambers, Model GC8-2H. Manufacturer: Enconair Ecological Chambers, 
Canada. Intended Use: The instrument is intended to be used for studies 
of plants that have been recovered from cell culture for the purpose of 
determining gene function by expressing the genes in genetically 
engineered plants. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: 
September 13, 2000.

Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 00-25466 Filed 10-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

FLASH-CONTROL LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00360-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

JOINT MOTION TO STAY ALL DEADLINES 

Plaintiff Flash-Control LLC (“Flash-Control”) and Defendant Intel Corporation. (“Intel”) 

(collectively, “the Parties”) respectfully request that the Court stay all pending deadlines in the 

case, until completion of the appeals process in Flash-Control, LLC v. Intel Corporation, 1:19-cv01107-ADA (“Flash-Control I”). That appeal relates to whether the asserted claims of U.S. Patent 

Nos. 8,531,880 (the ’880 patent) and 8,817,537 (the ’537 patent) have adequate written description 

support in their specification under 35 U.S.C. § 112. The two asserted patents in this case, U.S. 

Patent Nos. 9,257,184 (the ’184 patent) and 9,792,219 (the ’219 patent) are continuations of the 

’880 patent and the ’537 patent and share the same specification. Thus the appeal proceedings 

may have relevance to the ’184 and ’219 patents. The requested stay is not for delay but only to 

allow for an orderly resolution of this lawsuit.

Flash-Control is concurrently filing a joint motion to stay Flash-Control, LLC v. Micron 

Technology Inc., 6:20-cv-00361, which is the only other action in which Flash-Control is asserting 

the’184 and ’219 patents. Accordingly, granting both joint motions will preserve the Court’s and 

Case 6:20-cv-00360-ADA Document 14 Filed 08/20/20 Page 1 of 4
parties’ resources by suspending all district court activity on the ’880, ’537, ’184, and ’219 patents 

until resolution of the above appeal proceedings. 

Case 6:20-cv-00360-ADA Document 14 Filed 08/20/20 Page 2 of 4
DATED: August 20, 2020

DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC

By: /s/Alex Chan ________

Timothy Devlin 

tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com 

Jim Lennon 

jlennon@devlinlawfirm.com 

Derek Dahlgren

ddahlgren@devlinlawfirm.com

Alex Chan 

Texas State Bar No. 24108051 

achan@devlinlawfirm.com 

1526 Gilpin Ave.

Wilmington, Delaware 19806

Telephone: (302) 449-9010

Facsimile: (302) 353-4251

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Flash-Control LLC 

KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP

By: /s/_Stephen Ravel_______________

J. Stephen Ravel

Texas State Bar No. 16584975

KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP

303 Colorado Street, Suite 2000

Austin, TX 78701

Telephone: (512) 495-6429

Facsimile: (512) 495-6401

steve.ravel@kellyhart.com

James E. Wren 

Texas State Bar No. 22018200

1 Bear Place, Unit 97288

Waco, Texas 76798

Tel: (254) 710-7670

Email: james.wren@baylor.edu

Attorneys for Defendant,

Intel Corporation.

Case 6:20-cv-00360-ADA Document 14 Filed 08/20/20 Page 3 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system on August 20, 

2020.

/s/ Alex Chan

Alex Chan

Case 6:20-cv-00360-ADA Document 14 Filed 08/20/20 Page 4 of 4
#### JONES v. STATE.

No. 22869.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 17, 1944.

Rehearing Denied June 14, 1944.

W. E. Pinkston and A. S. Baskett, both of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is robbery. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

Appellant, in due time, filed a motioii to quash the indictment upon two grounds: First, that it was vague, uncertain and ambiguous ; and second, because Judge Grover Adams, the duly elected, qualified and acting judge of the Criminal District Court of Dallas County, Texas, had died before the indictment in this case was returned; that by reason thereof the Criminal District Court of Dallas County had no qualified judge presiding over said court to receive the indictment.

We have examined the indictment with reference to the first contention made by the appellant and reached the conclusion that it is sufficiently definite and certain in its allegations so as to apprise him of the nature of the accusation against him.

With reference to the second contention, we deem it only necessary to here refer to the well-considered opinion by Judge Davidson in the case of Pierson v. State, Tex.Crim.App., 177 S.W.2d 975, which disposes of that question adversely to him.

No bills of exception appear in the transcript. Neither is there a statement of facts accompanying the same.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the trial court be,'and the same is,-in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant in his motion, we think, confuses the statute now found as Section 5, Article 200a, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., passed at the Regular Session 48th Legislature, c. 22, page 25, with Art. 5, Sec. 28, of our State Constitution, Vernon’s Ann.St., which latter provision merely authorizes the governor of the State to appoint district judges to succeed those resigned or deceased.

Under the above act of the 48th Legislature, p. 25, there is no appointment of any person to take the place of a judge, deceased or resigned. The act merely provides, among other things, as follows:

> “ * * * and Judges may also be assigned in' the manner herein provided for the holding of a District Court, when by reason of the death, resignation, or from any cause whatsoever, the office of District *76Judge of the District is or has become vacant.”

We think the judge assigned by the Presiding Judge of the Administrative District was not an appointment as is contemplated by Art. 5, Section 28, of the State Constitution. We think this matter was correctly settled in the case of Pierson v. State, referred to in the original opinion, and the motion will be overruled.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DR. JEROME CORSI, et al

 Plaintiffs

v.

INFOWARS, LLC, et al

Defendants.

 Case Number: 1:20-cv-298-LY

 

 

PLAINTIFFS JEROME CORSI’S AND LARRY KLAYMAN’S REQUEST FOR

HEARING

Plaintiffs Jerome Corsi and Larry Klayman (“Plaintiffs”) hereby respectfully request that

the Court set and expedited hearing on their Motion for Reconsideration and Reply to the 

Infowars Defendants’ Response to Objections to Report and Recommendation of Magistrate 

Andrew W. Austin, ECF No. 124, given the constitutional and other rights at issue and the 

ongoing harm to Plaintiffs as a result of the defamation and the illegal actions of the Defendants

Dated: July 8, 2021 Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/Sanjay Biswas 

SANJAY BISWAS, Esq.

#24061235—Texas

#24966--Louisiana

11720 Duxbury Dr.

Frisco, Texas 75035

Telephone: (972)-866-5879

Email:sanjaybiswas41@gmail.com

Fax: 1-800-506-6804

Counsel for Dr. Jerome Corsi

/s/Larry Klayman 

Larry Klayman, Esq.

7050 W. Palmetto Park Rd

Boca Raton FL, 33433

Email:leklayman@gmail.com

Case 1:20-cv-00298-LY Document 131 Filed 07/08/21 Page 1 of 2
2

Tel: 561-558-5336

Plaintiff Pro Se

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 8, 2021, a true copy of the foregoing was filed via 

ECF and served to all counsel of record though the Court’s ECF system.

/s/ Sanjay Biswas

Case 1:20-cv-00298-LY Document 131 Filed 07/08/21 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Wyoming Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Wyoming Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 165    | 492    | 648   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 683    | 541    | 546    | 503    | 634    | 391    | 2,354  | 425    | 617    | 619   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 543    | 893    | 437    | 523    | 1,026  | 505    | 569    | 1,368  | 1,774  | 2,910 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 753    | 1,488  | 1,161  | 2,704  | 3,586  | 1,822  | 2,281  | 1,818  | 4,383  | 3,535 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5,540  | 3,033  | 6,715  | 1,737  | 6,530  | 7,628  | 1,067  | 1,354  | 1,089  | 3,346 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4,869  | 125    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                          
|California Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                                          
|California Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1      | 23     | 0      | 37    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
THIS AGREEMENT is dated for reference the 28th day of February 2001.

BETWEEN:

             INFORMATION  HIGHWAY.COM,  INC.
             #185,  10751  Shellbridge  Way
             Richmond,  BC  V6X  2W8

             ("IHWY")

                                                               OF THE FIRST PART

AND:

             SMR  INVESTMENTS  LTD./SUSANNE  ROBERTSON
             185  -  10751  Shellbridge  Way
             Richmond,  B.C.  V6X  2W8

             ("SMR"  and  "Sue")

                                                              OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS:

     Information  Highway.com,  Inc.  wishes to sell its 100% interest in Pavlik
     Travel  Agency  for  $125,000  and  SMR Investments, Ltd./Susanne Robertson
     agrees to purchase Pavlik Travel Agency for $125,000 on the following terms
     and  conditions:

1.   SMR  agrees  to  pay the Bank of Montreal loan for Information Highway.com,
     Inc.

2.   SMR  agrees to option Pavlik Travel Agency back to Information Highway.com,
     Inc.  within  a 12 month period for the $125,000 effective the date of this
     Agreement.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and  year  first  above  written.




     /s/  John  Robertson                           /s/  John  Robertson
-------------------------------               -------------------------------
INFORMATION  HIGHWAY.COM,  INC.                    SMR  INVESTMENTS,  LTD.



     /s/  Susanne  Robertson
-------------------------------
SUSANNE  ROBERTSON


<PAGE>
#### RATLIFF v. STATE.

No. 26271.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 18, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*201MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is áffirmed.
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

19 June 2006

(2006/C 144/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25921]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, App. 2, and section 101-6.1015(a), title 41, Code of 
Federal Regulations, and following consultation with the Committee 
Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is 
hereby given that the Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee has 
been renewed for a two-year period beginning October 2, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Rachel M. Samuel at (202) 586-
3279.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee will continue to provide 
advice to the Director, Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and 
Technology, on long-term planning and priorities in the national 
nuclear energy research and development program. The Secretary of 
Energy has determined that renewal of the Committee is essential to the 
conduct of the Department's business and in the public interest in the 
connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Department 
of Energy by law. The Committee will continue to operate in accordance 
with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 
Number 92-463), section 624 of the Department of Energy Act (Public Law 
Number 95-91), the General Services Administration Final Rule on 
Federal Advisory Committee Management, and other directives and 
instructions issued in implementation of those acts.

    Issued in Washington D.C. on October 2, 2000.
James N. Solit,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25921 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-454 

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-461 

PUBLIC VERSION

MICROSOFT CORPORATION’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO STANDING 

Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 163 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 163 Filed 05/10/22 Page 2 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 163 Filed 05/10/22 Page 3 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 163 Filed 05/10/22 Page 4 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 163 Filed 05/10/22 Page 5 of 8
4 

Finally, WSOU’s reliance on what may or may not have been Wade’s or WSOU’s intent 

at some point prior to the effective date of the is irrelevant. (Opp. Br., 

5.) The 

III. CONCLUSION

Wade holds title to the Wade Patents. WSOU lacks Article III standing to bring these

cases. This Court should enter judgment of no liability to Microsoft, and dismiss Case No. 6:20-

cv-454 (involving the ’160 Patent) and Case No. 6:20-cv-461 (involving the ’702 Patent).

DATED: May 3, 2022 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Richard A. Cederoth (by permission) 

Melissa R. Smith, Bar No. 24001351 

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com 

James “Travis” Underwood, Bar No. 

24102587 

travis@gillamsmithlaw.com

GILLAM & SMITH, LLP 

303 South Washington Avenue 

Marshall, Texas 75670 

Tel: (903) 934-8450 

Fax: (903) 934-9257 

Michael J. Bettinger

mbettinger@sidley.com 

Irene Yang 

irene.yang@sidley.com 

Brooke S. Boll 

brooke.boll@sidley.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street, Suite 2000 

Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 163 Filed 05/10/22 Page 6 of 8
5 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Tel: (415) 772-1200 

Fax: (415) 772-7400 

Richard A. Cederoth 

rcederoth@sidley.com 

John W. McBride 

jwmcbride@sidley.com 

Richard M. Chen 

rchen@sidley.com 

Kevin Robert Oliver

kevin.oliver@sidley.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

1 South Dearborn St. 

Chicago, IL 60603 

Tel: (312) 853-7000 

Fax: (312) 853-7036 

ATTORNEYS FOR MICROSOFT 

CORPORATION 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 163 Filed 05/10/22 Page 7 of 8
6 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Richard M. Chen, certify that on May 3, 2022 this document and related exhibits 

(unless previously-filed or non-confidential) were filed under seal with the Clerk of Court via the 

Court’s CM/ECF system. This documents and the applicable exhibits were subsequently served 

on all counsel of record by electronic mail. 

DATED: May 3, 2022 /s/ Richard M. Chen 

Richard M. Chen 

rchen@sidley.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

1 South Dearborn St. 

Chicago, IL 60603 

Tel: (312) 853-7000 

Fax: (312) 853-7036 

ATTORNEY FOR MICROSOFT 

CORPORATION 

Case 6:20-cv-00461-ADA Document 163 Filed 05/10/22 Page 8 of 8