alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

JENAM TECH, LLC, 

 Plaintiff 

v. 

GOOGLE LLC, 

 Defendant. 

Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-00453 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

PATENT CASE 

PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Plaintiff Jenam Tech, LLC state that they have no parent 

corporation and that no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. 

Dated: June 1, 2020 /s/ James M. Lennon 

James M. Lennon (Bar No. 4570) 

Timothy Devlin (Bar No. 4241) 

Derek Dahlgren (Bar No. 983624) 

Cory Edwards (Bar No. 6329639) 

DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC 

1526 Gilpin Avenue 

Wilmington, DE 19806 

Telephone: (302) 449-9010 

Facsimile: (302) 353-4251 

jlennon@devlinlawfirm.com 

tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com 

ddahlgren@devlinlawfirm.com 

cedwards@devlinlawfirm.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

Jenam Tech, LLC

 

Case 6:20-cv-00453-ADA Document 4 Filed 06/01/20 Page 1 of 2
 2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on June 1, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 

Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to all counsel of 

record in the above-referenced matter. 

Dated: June 1, 2020 /s/ James M. Lennon 

James M. Lennon 

Case 6:20-cv-00453-ADA Document 4 Filed 06/01/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
4.1


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 3 TO THE GAUCHO GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.


(FORMERLY
ALGODON WINES & LUXURY DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.)


2018
AWLD EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


Section
4(a) of the Plan, as previously amended, is hereby further amended as follows:


 


	Section
    4.	Shares
    Available for Awards


 


	(a)	Shares
    Available. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) of the Plan, the aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under
    the Plan, excluding shares issued under the Pre-Existing Plans, shall be 1,775,730 Shares (15% of the Common Stock outstanding on
    a fully-diluted basis as of the date of stockholder approval of August 26, 2021), plus an automatic annual increase to be added on
    January 1 of each year equal to 2.5% of the total number of Shares outstanding on such date (including for this purpose any Shares
    issuable upon conversion of any outstanding capital stock of the Company).
	 	 
	(i)	Any
    Shares subject to an Award issued under this Plan or the Pre-Existing Plans that are canceled, forfeited or expire prior to exercise
    or realization, either in full or in part, shall be added to the total number of Shares available for an Award to be made under the
    Plan.
	 	 
	(ii)	Shares
    to be issued under the Plan must be authorized but unissued Shares.
	 	 
	(iii)	Notwithstanding
    the foregoing, (A) the number of Shares available for granting Incentive Stock Options under the Plan shall not exceed the aggregate
    number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan not taking into account any automatic increase in the share reserve, subject to
    adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) of the Plan and subject to the provisions of Section 422 or 424 of the Code or any successor
    provision and (B) the number of Shares available for granting Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall not exceed 500,000,
    subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) of the Plan. Shares tendered by Participants as full or partial payment to the
    Company upon exercise of an Award, and Shares withheld by or otherwise remitted to the Company to satisfy a Participant’s tax
    withholding obligations with respect to an Award, shall not then become available for issuance under the Plan. Any Shares withheld
    or otherwise remitted to the Company to satisfy tax withholding obligations, to pay the exercise price of an Award, or Shares of
    Common Stock subject to a broker-assisted cashless exercise of an Award shall reduce the number of Shares available for issuance
    under the Plan.
	 	 
	(iv)	The
    maximum number of Shares subject to an Award granted during a Fiscal Year to any Director (exclusive of Shares subject to an Award
    issued to any Director in his or her capacity as an Employee of the Company), together with any cash fees paid to such Director during
    the Fiscal Year shall not exceed a total value of $100,000 (calculating the value of any Awards based on the grant date fair value
    for financial reporting purposes).
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|Florida Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|Florida Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 98     | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 4      | 0      | 14     | 0      | 0      | 0      | W      | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                               
|                                                               
|Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 115    | 62     | 2      | 0      | 0      | 7      | 83     | 0      | 32     | 79    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 239    | 4      | 71     | 0      | 40     | 1,326  | 0      | 2,821  | 7,029  | 8,020 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,544  | 342    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 23



Independent Auditors Consent



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-97419, No. 333-110775, No. 333-110777 and 333-107337) on Form S-8 of North State
Bancorp and Subsidiary of our report dated January 23, 2004 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of North State Bancorp and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
shareholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the annual report on Form 10-KSB of North State Bancorp and Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2003.



/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC

---

Dixon Hughes PLLC

Sanford, North Carolina

March 25, 2004
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Ohio Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Ohio Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 6     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 1      | 10     | 9      | 38     | 70     | 49     | 69     | 79     | 54    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 31     | 57     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### JORDAN v. STATE.

No. 26441.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 20, 1953.

Robert Kirk, Littlefield, for appellant.

Curtis R. Wilkinson, County Atty., Little-field, and Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of whiskey in a dry area; the punishment, a fine ■of $1,000.

From the statement of facts on motion for new trial,- it' is obvious that the juror Lambert, while the jury was deliberating, told his fellow jurors that he had on a. prior occasion bought whiskey from the appellant. The State sought to avoid the effect of this receipt of new evidence by eliciting from the jurors the assurance that-, such new evidence, though discussed, was' not “considered” by them in reaching their verdict.

The presumption arising from the receipt of testimony damaging to the accused after the jury had retired may not be rebutted by testimony of the jurors to the effect that they were not' influenced by such new evidence. Article 753, subd. 7, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; McCoy v. State, 113 Tex.Cr.R. 302, 21 S.W.2d 516; and cases cited.

In Green v. State, 116 Tex.Cr.R. 203, 34 S.W.2d 280, we said

> *86“The declarations of the jurors that they were influenced by the occurrence taking place in the jury room are not regarded as of any weight on appeal.”

In Pafford v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 299, 135 S.W.2d 990, we held that the receipt of new and harmful facts by the jury during their deliberations which indicated that the accused may have been a bootlegger violated his constitutional rights to be confronted by the witnesses against him.

The statement by the juror that he had on a prior occasion bought whiskey from the appellant was new and harmful evidence improperly presented before the jury and calls for a reversal of this cause.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
6:20-cv-00348

Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 1 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 2 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 3 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 4 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 5 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 6 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 7 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 8 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 9 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 10 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 11 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 12 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 13 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 14 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 15 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 16 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 17 of 18
Case 6:20-cv-00348-ADA Document 1-3 Filed 04/30/20 Page 18 of 18
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the DoD Healthcare Quality Initiative Review Panel

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: An executive/administration meeting for DoD Healthcare Quality 
Initiatives Review Panel has been scheduled for October 12 & 13, 2000.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice set forth the meeting of the DoD Healthcare 
Quality Initiatives Review Panel. Notice of meeting is required under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

DATES: October 12 & 13, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Sheraton Crystal City, 1800 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Arlington, 
VA 22202.

TIME: October 12th, 8:00 am to 5:30 pm; October 13th, 8:00 am to 5:30 
pm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact Gia Edmonds at (703) 933-8325.

    Dated: September 25, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-25099 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Oragenics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the periodended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Stanley B. Stein, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

A signed original of this written certification has been providedto the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

Dated thisMarch 4, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rotech Healthcare Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Philip L. Carter, as
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven P. Alsene, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of each such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/    PHILIP L.
CARTER              
|Name:  |  | Philip L. Carter                     
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | February 28, 2011                    
|       | 
|       |  | /s/    STEVEN P.
ALSENE              
|Name:  |  | Steven P. Alsene                     
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|Date:  |  | February 28, 2011                    

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## MARYLANDDEPARTMENTOFTHE ENVIRONMENT 1800 WashingtonBoulevard.BaltimoreMD 21230 

# MDE 410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101

Martin O'Malley RobertM. Summers, Ph.D Governor Secretary Anthony G. Brown LieutenantGovernor**JU.~** 

### '- 2

## :>on

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator (3RAOO) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650Arch Street Philadelphia PA 19103-2029
Dear Mr. Garvin:
The purpose ofthis letter is to submitthe enclosed State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision # 11-03 concerning adoption ofthe Environmental Protection Agency's Control Technique Guidelines for miscellaneous metal and plastic parts coating. This SIP Revision includes amendments to Regulation .07 and new Regulation .07-2 under COMAR 26.11.19 Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes.
The Notice of Proposed Action for this SIP Revision was published in the Maryland Register on January 14, 2011. A public hearing was held on February 15, 2011. The action was adopted on April 14, 2011. The Notice of Final Action was published on May 6, 2011 and the amendments and new regulation became effective on May 16, 2011. All administrative procedures were properly followed throughout the adoption process. I certify that the electronic copy ofthis SIP submittal (enclosed) is an exact duplicate ofthe official hard copy. Ifyou have any questions concerning this SIP submittal, please feel free to call me at (410) 537-4187 or Mr. George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director ofthe Air and Radiation Management Administration, at (410) 537-3255. Sincerely,

Robert M. Summers, PhD Secretary RMS:dhr Enclosures

Recycled Paper www.mde.state.md.us TIV Users 1-800-735-2258 ViaMaryland Relay Service
#### SPRADLIN v. WILLIAMSON.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 13, 1953.

Rehearing Denied May 8, 1953.

F. M. Spradlin, pro se, for appellant.

W. R. McCoy, Jr., Inez, for appellee.

DUNCAN, Justice.

By this action, appellee sought to quiet his title to approximately five acres of land in Martin County. From a judgment declaring appellee to be the owner of the land and dismissing appellant’s counterclaim, the appeal is prosecuted.

By a prior action in the Martin Circuit Court, the appellant sought to quiet his title to the same land against James A. Williamson, appellee’s predecessor in title. Appellant was unsuccessful in that action, and the judgment was affirmed upon appeal to this Court. Spradlin v. Williamson, 298 Ky. 93, 182 S.W.2d 335.

The parties claim through a common grantor, M. C. Dingus, who conveyed to appellant a'tract of land in Johnson County adjoining the Martin County line. Subsequently, the same grantor conveyed to ap-pellee’s predecessor a tract in Martin *67County, calling for a corner common to appellant’s tract on the county line. There is some controversy concerning the proper location of the county, line at the point where it divides the land between the parties, but neither of the judgments sought to determine its location.

The opinion on the first appeal recites that after the execution of their deeds the parties took possession of their respective boundaries to the line now claimed by appellee and fixed by the court and that possession on the part of appellee and his predecessor continued for the statutory period. As between the parties and their privies, any fact or issue expressly, or by necessary implication, determined in a former suit is final and conclusive in any subsequent action involving the same fact or issue. Vaughn’s Adm’r v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 297 Ky. 309, 179 S.W.2d 441, 152 A.L.R. 1060. The opinion on the first appeal is conclusive and precludes our reexamination of the facts which were there determined.

The judgment is affirmed.