alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 194 (Thursday, October 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25560]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Experts' Meeting on High-Burnup Fuel Behavior Under Postulated 
Accident Conditions

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a meeting to 
complete the Phenomena Identification and Ranking Tables (PIRTs) for 
three accidents. PIRTs have been used at NRC since 1988, and they 
provide a structured way to obtain a technical understanding that is 
needed to address certain issues. About twenty of the world's best 
technical experts are participating in this activity, and the experts 
represent a balance between industry, universities, foreign 
researchers, and regulatory organizations. The current PIRT activity is 
addressing high-burnup fuel behavior for a PWR control rod ejection 
accident, a BWR failure to scram accident with power oscillations, and 
a loss of coolant accident for a BWR and a PWR.

DATES: October 26-27, 2000, 8:30 am-5:30 pm.

ADDRESSES: Room T10A1 (TWFN) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting agenda will be posted on the NRC 
Web site at www.nrc.gov/RES/meetings.htm by October 17, 2000. The 
meeting is open to the public. Attendees will need to obtain a visitor 
badge at the TWFN building lobby.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ralph Meyer, SMSAB, Division of 
Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness, Office of Nuclear 
Regulatory Research, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-
6789.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of September 2000.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John H. Flack,
Acting Director, Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory 
Effectiveness, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 00-25560 Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Case 1:20-cv-00434-DAE-ML   Document 68-2   Filed 08/26/21   Page 1 of 5

Case 1:20-cv-00434-DAE-ML   Document 68-2   Filed 08/26/21   Page 2 of 5

Case 1:20-cv-00434-DAE-ML   Document 68-2   Filed 08/26/21   Page 3 of 5

Case 1:20-cv-00434-DAE-ML   Document 68-2   Filed 08/26/21   Page 4 of 5

Case 1:20-cv-00434-DAE-ML   Document 68-2   Filed 08/26/21   Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Standard Motor Products, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence I. Sills, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
Lawrence I. Sills


Lawrence
I. Sills


Chief
Executive Officer


August 6,
2009








*           A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Standard Motor Products, Inc. and will be retained by Standard Motor
Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5356 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-[8-Amino-1-(2-phenyl-quinolin-7-yl)- 

imidazo[1,5-a]pyrazin- 3-yl]-1-methyl-cyclobutanol (OSI–906). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. DOLD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-[8-Amino-1-(2-phenylquinolin-7-yl)-imidazo[1,5-a]pyrazin- 3-yl]-1-methylcyclobutanol (OSI–906). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3-[8-AMINO-1-(2-PHENYL-QUINOLIN-7-YL)- 

4 IMIDAZO[1,5-A]PYRAZIN-3-YL]-1-METHYL5 CYCLOBUTANOL (OSI–906). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5356 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 3-[8-Amino-1-(2-phenylquinolin-7-yl)-imidazo[1,5- 

a]pyrazin-3-yl]-1-methylcyclobutanol (OSI–906), 

(CAS No. 867160–71–2) 

(provided for in subheading 2933.49.26) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### BATTLE et al. v. STATE.

No. 24060.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 26, 1948.

No attorney for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant Clifton Battle was convicted of murder and assessed a penalty of ten years. Houston Battle, Jr., who was tried jointly as a principal, was assessed a penalty of five years, from which they appeal.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. The proceedings appear regular. Nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Milton Goodman, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), rendered January 8, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the lineup was tainted because the detective told the two witnesses that he would be trying to apprehend the suspect and that when and if he did they would view a lineup. We disagree. The suggestion of a law enforcement official to a witness that the person identified in a photograph will be in a lineup does not by itself give rise to a substantial likelihood of misidentification *(see, People v Rodriguez,*64 NY2d 738, 740-741; *People v Bolling,*142 AD2d 733; *353
      *People v Ballard,*140 AD2d 529; *People v Thomas,*133 AD2d 867). Similarly, in the case at bar, the detective’s comment did not give rise to a substantive likelihood of misidentification. We also find that the lineup was not unduly suggestive *(see, People v Scott,*114 AD2d 915).

The testimony of the defendant’s accomplice regarding defendant’s prior criminal activity and drug use was proper since it was relevant to show his motive *(see, People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233; *People v Molineux,*168 NY 264, 293; *People v Velez,*159 AD2d 665; *People v Johnson,*155 AD2d 924, 925). Moreover, in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, any error was harmless *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242).

The defendant’s claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel in choosing to reject a plea agreement and proceed to trial is based on matters dehors the record and is not reviewable on this appeal *(see, People v Hamlin,*153 AD2d 644; *People v Walker,*152 AD2d 644; *People v Reyes,*150 AD2d 620).

Finally, the defendant’s remaining allegations of error are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit, or the errors are harmless beyond a reasonable doubt *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*55 NY2d 474, *cert denied*459 US 846; *People v Bailey,*155 AD2d 262; *People v Patterson,*106 AD2d 520; *People v Smith,*100 AD2d 857, 858; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242, *supra).*Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5431 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women’s footwear. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. HUELSKAMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women’s 

footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN’S FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5431 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Footwear valued over $3 

but not over $6.50/pair, 

with uppers of vegetable fibers and having outer soles 

of textile materials having 

the greatest surface area 

in contact with the ground, 

but not taken into account 

under the terms of additional U.S. note 5 to chapter 64 of the HTSUS, for 

women (provided for in 

subheading 6404.11.71) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATIONS**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE *SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

I, Ping’an Wu,  Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that this report on Form 10-KSB/A of China Properties Developments,  Inc. for the  period ending December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in this report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the  financial  condition  and results of operations of  China Properties Developments,  Inc. September 27, 2006/s/ Ping’an Wu                                           Ping’an Wu, Chief Executive Officer, 				China Properties Developments, Inc. 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Oragenics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the periodended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Dorothy J. Delfino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

A signed original of this written certification has been providedto the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

Dated thisMarch 4, 2008
NO. 12-08-00020-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JAIMAR DESEAN SMITH, § APPEAL FROM THE 

APPELLANT

V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Jaimar Desean Smith appeals his conviction for misdemeanor driving while intoxicated, for

which he was sentenced to confinement for one hundred eighty days, probated for sixteen months.

Appellant’s counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.

1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967) and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). We

affirm.

BACKGROUND

Appellant was charged with misdemeanor driving while intoxicated and pleaded “not

guilty.” The matter proceeded to a jury trial. Ultimately, the jury found Appellant “guilty” as

charged. Thereafter, the trial courtsentenced Appellant to confinement for one hundred eighty days,

but probated Appellant’s sentence and placed Appellant on community supervision for sixteen

months. The trial court further imposed on Appellant a fine of one thousand five hundred dollars

and ordered that Appellant pay court costs of three hundred thirty-nine dollars. This appeal

followed.

ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO ANDERS V. CALIFORNIA
 Counsel for Appellant certified in his motion to withdraw that he provided Appellant with a copy of this 1

brief. Appellant was given time to file his own brief in this cause. The time for filing such a brief has expired and

we have received no pro se brief.

2

Appellant’s counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California and Gainous v.

State. Appellant’s counsel states that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and is of the

opinion that the record reflects no reversible error and that there is no error upon which an appeal

can be predicated. He further relates that he is well acquainted with the facts in this case. In

compliance with Anders, Gainous, and High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.]

1978), Appellant’s brief presents a chronological summation of the procedural history of the case

and further states that Appellant’s counsel is unable to raise any arguable issues for appeal. We 1

have likewise reviewed the record for reversible error and have found none.

CONCLUSION

As required by Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991), Appellant’s

counsel has moved for leave to withdraw. We carried the motion for consideration with the merits.

Having done so and finding no reversible error, Appellant’s counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is hereby granted and the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Opinion delivered September 24, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Louisiana - South Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Louisiana - South Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 343   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 342    | 328    | 370    | 396    | 405    | 335    | 333    | 323    | 299    | 298   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 267    | 278    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4944 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4944

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Sensomer CT-400.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

Mr. LaTourette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Sensomer CT-400.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENSOMER CT-400.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      D-Galacto-D-        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        mannan, 2-hydroxy-                                                 31/2015.......
                        3-
                        (trimethylammonio
                        )propyl ether,
                        chloride (CAS No.
                        83589-59-7), 1-
                        Propanaminium,
                        2,3-dihydroxy-
                        N,N,N-trimethyl-,
                        chloride (CAS No.
                        34004-36-9) and
                        water (provided
                        for in subheading
                        1302.39.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### NEAL v. STATE.

No. 25660.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Murder is the offense; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for twenty years.

Neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception accompany the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is 'affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

17 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MidCarolina Financial Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Randolph J. Cary, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Christopher B. Redcay, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ RANDOLPH J. CARY, JR.
|Randolph J. Cary, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer  
|March 27, 2007           
|                         
|/s/ CHRISTOPHER B. REDCAY
|Christopher B. Redcay    
|Chief Financial Officer  
|March 27, 2007           

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBE R 6, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 00199

- CV

Steven Gregory Sloat, Ed Bryan, Churc h of Scientology International,

David J. Lubow, and Monty Drake, Appellant s

v.

Monique Rathbun, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on March 14, 2014.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was reversible

error in the portion of the trial court’s order awarding attorneys’ fees to appellee . Therefore, the

C ourt reverses the portion of the trial court’s order awarding attorneys’ fees to appellee, but

affirms the portion of the trial court’s order denying appellants’ motions to dismiss. A ppellant s

shall pay all costs relating to th is appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/ A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., 

EMC CORPORATION, AND VMWARE, INC., 

Defendants. 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/ A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/ A 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

GOOGLE, LLC, 

Defendant. 

Case Numbers: 

6:20-cv-00473-ADA 

6:20-cv-00474-ADA 

6:20-cv-00475-ADA 

6:20-cv-00476-ADA 

6:20-cv-00477-ADA 

6:20-cv-004 78-ADA 

6:20-cv-004 79-ADA 

6:20-cv-00480-ADA 

6:20-cv-00481-ADA 

6:20-cv-00482-ADA 

6:20-cv-00485-ADA 

6:20-cv-00486-ADA 

Case Numbers: 

6:20-cv-00487-ADA 

6:20-cv-00488-ADA 

6:20-cv-00489-ADA 

6:20-cv-00490-ADA 

6:20-cv-00491-ADA 

6:20-cv-00492-ADA 

6:20-cv-00493-ADA 

6:20-cv-00494-ADA 

6:20-cv-00495-ADA 

6:20-cv-00496-ADA 

6:20-cv-00497-ADA 

Case Numbers: 

6:20-cv-00571-ADA 

6:20-cv-00572-ADA 

6:20-cv-00573-ADA 

6:20-cv-00575-ADA 

6:20-cv-00576-ADA 

6:20-cv-00579-ADA 

6:20-cv-00580-ADA 

6:20-cv-00583-ADA 

6:20-cv-00584-ADA 

6:20-cv-00585-ADA 

1

1

This Order is only filed in the above- and below-captioned cases that are in bold font. 

However, any substantive order resulting from the hearing will be filed in each of the aboveand below-captioned cases.

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 155 Filed 02/11/22 Page 1 of 2
ORDER SETTING HEARING ON MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered cases in bold font are reset 

for MOTION HEARING by Zoom on Monday, February 14, 2022 at 9:00 AM.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of February, 2022.

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 155 Filed 02/11/22 Page 2 of 2