alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex parte TERWILLINGER.

No. 24940.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 23, 1950.

Bracewell & Wright, Huntsville, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Relator filed his application for writ of habeas corpus before Hon. Max M. Rogers, Judge of the 12th Judicial District of Texas, alleging the invalidity of the judgment of conviction under which he is incarcerated in the penitentiary. The basis of such contention was that the judgment was upon a plea of guilty upon trial before the court of the capital felony of robbery with firearms. A copy of the judgment certified as correct, and showing such a trial without a jury, was offered on the hearing before Judge Rogers. Certified copies of the judgment and sentence and the certificate of the judge who presided at the trial showing it to have been a trial by jury was offered by respondent.

Relator appealed from the judgment of conviction in question, and the transcript in our Cause No. 23,206 reveals that the trial *448was had before a jury. The opinion on said appeal (Terwillinger v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 79, 191 S.W.2d 481) discloses also that the trial of Relator was a trial before a jury.

Being records of this court, we are authorized to consider the same.

We are unable to account for the existence of the incorrect copy showing a trial before the court. Nor can we understand how Relator, .who was present at the trial, can explain his allegation that he was tried without a jury.

Judge Rogers granted the writ and made it returnable before this court as provided in Art. 119, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

Relator being lawfully restrained, the relief prayed for is refused and Relator is remanded to the custody of the penitentiary authorities.

Opinion approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5315 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5315

    To suspend temporarily the duty on other non-threaded articles 
                  (fasteners) of iron or steel, nesoi.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on other non-threaded articles 
                  (fasteners) of iron or steel, nesoi.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NON-THREADED ARTICLES (FASTENERS) OF IRON OR STEEL, NESOI.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         Non-threaded       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          articles                                                          12/31/2015
                          (fasteners) of
                          iron or steel,
                          NESOI (provided
                          for in subheading
                          7318.29.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
4:20

cv

00042

DC

DBF
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5161 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber tow. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mrs. LUMMIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber 

tow. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC FIBER TOW. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5161 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic fiber tow containing 

98 percent or more by weight 

of acrylonitrile units, 2 percent or more but not more 

than 4 percent of water, and 

not more than 30 ppm sodium, the foregoing 

consisiting of up to 3 subbundles each containing 

50,000 filaments and with 

average filament measuring 

1.2 decitex (plus or minus 

0.1) (provided for in subheading 5501.30.00) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1071

In re: JOHN DOE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:95-cr-00076-H-1)

Submitted: April 24, 2020 Decided: May 28, 2020

Amended: November 4, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Doe, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Doe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly 

delayed ruling on a motion in his criminal case. He seeks an order from this court directing 

the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district 

court granted in part and denied in part Doe’s motion on March 11, 2020. Accordingly, 

because the district court has recently ruled on the motion, we deny the mandamus petition 

as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
WACO

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs. NO: WA:20-CV-00456-ADA

ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC TELEPHONIC DISCOVERY HEARING

11/30/2020

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

at 03:30 PM

11/28/2020

Alan D Albright

SIGNED on

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

§

§

§

§

§

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

The Court hereby sets and directs the parties, or counsel acting on their behalf, to appear by

phone for a telephone conference on November 30, 2020 at 03:30 PM . Please call (866) 434-5269

with access code 9678090 to be included in the hearing.

Case 6:20-cv-00456-ADA Document 38 Filed 11/28/20 Page 1 of 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5485 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain narrow woven fabrics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain narrow 

woven fabrics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN NARROW WOVEN FABRICS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Narrow woven fabrics 

(other than ribbons), not 

pile, of man-made fibers, 

not containing by weight 

5% or more of elastomeric 

yarn or rubber (provided 

for in subheading 

5806.32.20) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5485 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
AO 399 (01/09) Waiver of the Service of Summons 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC 

Plaintiff 

V. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 

Defendant 

for the 

Western District of Texas 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 6:20-CV-454-ADA 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: James L. Etheridge, Esq. 

(Name of the plaintiff's attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, 

two copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court's 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 06/05/2020 , the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the 

United States). If I fail to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: 06/05/2020 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 

Printed name of party waiving service of summons 

Barry K. Shelton 

Printed name 

Shelton Coburn LLP 

311 RR 620 S, Suite 205 

Austin, TX 78734 

Address 

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com 

E-mail address

(512) 263-2165

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons 

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons 

and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff located in 

the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

"Good cause'' does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant's property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections. but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the plaintiff 

and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been served. 

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 9 Filed 06/05/20 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 532 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 532

  To eliminate certain provisions relating to Texas and the Education 
                               Jobs Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2011

   Mr. Burgess (for himself, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Paul, Mr. Carter, Mr. 
 McCaul, Mr. Barton of Texas, Ms. Granger, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Culberson, 
 Mr. Olson, Mr. Canseco, Mr. Hall, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Sam Johnson of 
Texas, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Flores, Mr. Poe of Texas, Mr. Marchant, 
 Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Neugebauer, and 
 Mr. Farenthold) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To eliminate certain provisions relating to Texas and the Education 
                               Jobs Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness for Texas Schools Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO TEXAS.

    Section 101 of Public Law 111-226 (124 Stat. 2389) is amended by 
striking paragraph (11).
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|New Mexico Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|New Mexico Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 17     | 22     | 26     | 4      | 12     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report
(Form 10-KSB) of Oragenics, Inc. of our report dated February 19, 2007, with respect to the 2006 financial statements of Oragenics, Inc.

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (i) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-110646) of Oragenics, Inc. pertaining to the Oragenics, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan;
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | Post Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 to Form SB-2 (No. 333-125660) and related Prospectus of Oragenics, Inc. for the registration of
4,109,689 shares of its common stock issuable upon by Fusion Capital; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (iii) | Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-131015, 333-132516 and 333-140097) and related Prospectus of Oragenics, Inc. for the registration of 7,205,000, 3,000,000 and 185,186
shares of its common stock, respectively.
| | ----- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated February 19, 2007, with respect to the financial statements of Oragenics,
Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) of Oragenics, Inc.

/s/ Kirkland, Russ, Murphy & Tapp, PA

Certified Public Accountants

Clearwater, Florida

March 23, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

HARMONY HAUS WESTLAKE, L.L.C., §

et al., §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§

v. § CIVIL NO. 1-20-CV-486-XR

§

PARKSTONE PROPERTY OWNERS §

ASSOCIATION, INC., §

§

Defendant. §

§

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE 

TO FILE OUT OF TIME

CAME ON TO BE CONSIDERED Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Out of Time (the 

“Motion”). Upon consideration of the Motion and any relevant arguments or evidence 

presented, this Court is of the opinion that the Motion is meritorious and should be GRANTED.

ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Out of Time is GRANTED. 

Plaintiffs are hereby permitted to file responses to file their responses to Defendant’s Opposed 

Motion to Strike Dr. Beare (Dkt. No. 40) and Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 

(Dkt. No. 42) on February 16, 2021.

_____________________

JUDGE PRESIDING

Case 1:20-cv-00486-XR Document 44-1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5416 

To suspend temporarily the duty on parts and accessories of microscopes 

other than optical. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. HONDA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on parts and accessories 

of microscopes other than optical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PARTS AND ACCESSORIES OF MICROSCOPES 

4 OTHER THAN OPTICAL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Parts and accessories of 

microscopes other than optical (provided for in subheading 9012.90.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5416 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACOACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00464-ADA

ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY DISCOVERY HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

DISCOVERY HEARING by Zoomoom on November 04, 2021 at 01:00 PM.

set

IT 3rd day of November, 2021.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00464-ADA Document 92 Filed 11/03/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Paul Mitrokostas, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
         Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, News America Debenture-Backed
         Series 2002-9 Trust (the "Trust") and all reports on Form 8-K
         containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed in
         respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report
         of the Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
         omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
         in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
         not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
         annual report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
         pooling and servicing or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports; and

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar
         agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
         review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
         reports, the Depositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its
         obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 29, 2004


         /s/ PAUL MITROKOSTAS
--------------------------------------------
Paul Mitrokostas, Senior Vice President

                                      7
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.A


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2003, of Southern Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John W. Somerhalder II, Chairman of the Board, certify (i) that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ John W. Somerhalder II
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John W. Somerhalder II
                                           Chairman of the Board
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

                                           August 13, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Southern Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Southern
Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.