alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4901 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain women’s sports 

footwear. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. CARNAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

women’s sports footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN’S SPORTS FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.90.01 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain women’s sports footwear) is amended by striking 

7 the date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/ 

8 31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4901 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 32-15 Filed 12/16/20 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Wyoming Dry Natural Gas Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Wyoming Dry Natural Gas Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,780  | 1,845  | 772    | 333    | 865    | 139    | 3,239  | 337    | 286    | 174   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,278  | 1,145  | 536    | 695    | 3,098  | 1,153  | 552    | 2,950  | 329    | 40    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 19     | 630    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5244 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphorus Sulfochloride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphorus 

Sulfochloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHORUS SULFOCHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Phosphorus Sulfochloride 

(CAS No. 3982–91–0) 

(provided for in subheading 2812.10.50) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5244 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5394 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5394

    To reduce temporarily the duty on 3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-N-
        (3',4',5'-trifluorobiphenyl-2-yl)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2012

    Mr. Graves of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To reduce temporarily the duty on 3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-N-
        (3',4',5'-trifluorobiphenyl-2-yl)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-(DIFLUOROMETHYL)-1-METHYL-N-(3',4',5'-TRIFLUOROBIPHENYL-2-
              YL)PYRAZOLE-4-CARBOXAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        3-(difluoromethyl)- 6.1%            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          1-methyl-N-                                                       12/31/2015
                          (3',4',5'-
                          trifluorobiphenyl-
                          2-yl)pyrazole-4-
                          carboxamide (CAS
                          No. 907204-31-3)
                          (provided for
                          subheading
                          2933.19.37)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AREVIK GHAZARYAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-72598

Agency No. A095-875-483

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Arevik Ghazaryan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

FILED

NOV 01 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-72598

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence an adverse credibility finding, Rivera v. Mukasey, 508 F.3d 1271, 1274

(9th Cir. 2007), and review de novo claims of due process violations, Colmenar v.

INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir. 2000). We deny the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination

because of the multiple inconsistencies within Ghazaryan’s testimony and between

her testimony and declaration concerning the years of her alleged encounters with

the police, see Don v. Gonzales, 476 F.3d 738, 741 (9th Cir. 2007) and based on

Ghazaryan’s voluntary return to Armenia in 2000, see Loho v. Mukasey, 531 F.3d

1016, 1018-19 (9th Cir. 2008). The IJ properly rejected Ghazaryan’s explanations

for the inconsistencies. See Rivera, 508 F.3d at 1275 (9th Cir. 2007). In the

absence of credible testimony, Ghazaryan’s asylum and withholding of removal

claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Because Ghazaryan’s CAT claim is based on the testimony the IJ found not

credible, and she points to no other evidence to show it is more likely than not she

would be tortured if returned to Armenia, her CAT claim fails. See id. at 1156-57.

Ghazaryan contends her due process rights were violated when the

government did not make the author of an investigative report available for crossexamination. The proceedings were not “so fundamentally unfair that [she] was
3 07-72598

prevented from reasonably presenting [her] case” because the IJ continued the

hearing so Ghazaryan could respond to the report and Ghazaryan did not seek to

cross-examine the report’s author. See Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d at 971 (internal

quotation and citation omitted).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# What is a capacity factor? Capacity factors describe how intensively a fleet of generators is run. A capacity factor near 100% means a fleet is operating nearly all of the time. It is the ratio of a fleet's actual generation to its maximum potential generation. 

# Today in Energy January 15, 2014 

# Monthly generator capacity factor data now available by fuel and technology

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly, Tables 6.7aand 6.7b Capacity factors are an important measure of electric gene rator usage. In December 2013, EIA began publishing ta bles of monthly capacity factors for 16 different fossil and non-fossil fuel and technology combinations in the Electric Power Monthly

. In the past, EIA published annual capacity factors for onl y a few fuel types, and several renewable fuel types were aggregated. With an u pdated methodology and more detailed technology breakout, these new tables allow readers to distinguish between generators having different roles within the electric power system. Baseload generators, like nuclear units, typically havehigh capacity factors, while peaking generators like natural gas-fired combustion turbines have low capacity factors.
Monthly data allow users to see seasonal patterns, such as pe riods of nuclear refueling outages in the shoulder seasons (spring and fall) and increased operation of peaking generators during the periods of highest electricity demand in the summer months (driven primarily by air conditionin g use).
EIA's new tables include capacity factors for individual ren ewable generating technologies (see chart below). Geoth ermal and waste technologies operate fairly steadily and at high capacity f actors. Intermittent renewable sources like solar and wind tend to have lower capacity factors, as their output varies with the availabili ty of the sun and wind on both a daily and seasonal basi s. Solar generators —particularly solar thermal—operate at a minimum during winter months, while the U.S. wind fleet on average h as a period of low production during the late summer. Hydroelectric generat ors show both seasonal and annual variations reflecting changing levels of precipitation, river flow, and snowmelt. 

### Monthly generator capacity factor data now availabl e by fuel and techno... http://www.eia.gov/todayinen ergy/detail.cfm?id=14611

1 of 2 8/31/2015 8:47 AM

### Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly, Tables 6.7aand 6.7b

Principal contributor: EIA Staff 

### Monthly generator capacity factor data now availabl e by fuel and techno... http://www.eia.gov/todayinen ergy/detail.cfm?id=14611

2 of 2 8/31/2015 8:47 AM
EXHIBIT 99.1 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Integrated Brand Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Johnny Michel, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Johnny Michel 

___________________________

Johnny Michel

Principal Executive Officer

July 1, 2003
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 22-0196

Filed September 21, 2022

IN THE INTEREST OF R.S., 

Minor Child,

R.B., Father,

Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Rachel E. Seymour, 

District Associate Judge.

A father appeals the termination of his parental rights. AFFIRMED.

John Audlehelm of Audlehelm Law Office, Des Moines, for appellant father.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Ellen Ramsey-Kacena, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee State. 

Nicole Garbis Nolan of the Youth Law Center, Des Moines, attorney and 

guardian ad litem for minor child. 

Considered by Ahlers, P.J., and Badding and Chicchelly, JJ.
2

AHLERS, Presiding Judge.

The child, R.S., was born in 2021. The father was incarcerated at the time 

of the child’s birth and remained incarcerated through the termination hearing that 

leads to this appeal. The juvenile court terminated the father’s parental rights to 

the child under Iowa Code section 232.116(1)(b) and (h) (2021).

1

 The court also 

terminated the parental rights of the child’s mother. Only the father appeals. 

We review termination-of-parental-rights proceedings de novo. In re Z.K., 

973 N.W.2d 27, 32 (Iowa 2022). The father raises only one issue—that the State 

failed to prove the statutory ground for termination by abandonment under Iowa 

Code section 232.116(1)(b). He makes no challenge to termination under section 

232.116(1)(h). 

We need not address the father’s challenge to termination under 

section 232.116(1)(b). When, as here, a parent’s rights are terminated under 

multiple statutory grounds, we may affirm on any ground supported by the record. 

See In re A.B., 815 N.W.2d 764, 774 (Iowa 2012). As the father fails to challenge 

termination under section 232.116(1)(h), he waives any claim of error on that 

ground. See In re N.N., No. 21-1978, 2022 WL 610318, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. 

Mar. 2, 2022) (holding failure to challenge one of the grounds for termination 

permits us to affirm on that ground without analyzing other grounds challenged). 

Accordingly, we affirm the juvenile court’s ruling that termination is appropriate 

1 The termination order states the father’s parental rights were also terminated 

under section 232.116(1)(e). This appears to be a typographical error, as the court 

dismissed that ground during the termination hearing.
3

under section 232.116(1)(h). As the father makes no other challenge to the 

termination order, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.
----

Corrigendum to Notice of open competitions EPSO/AST/14-15/06 to constitute a reserve of assistants (AST1) with Bulgarian and Romanian citizenship in the secretarial field

(Official Journal of the European Union C 145 A of 21 June 2006)

(2006/C 152 A/02)

On page 23, part A:

for:

‘Please note that you may only apply for one of these competitions. You must choose which one when you register online, and cannot change choice after the closing date for registration.’,

read:

‘The European Personnel Selection Office is simultaneously organising the following open competitions:

in the following fields: European public administration, law, economics, audit.

in the secretariat field.

Please note that you may apply for one of these competitions and only in one field. You must choose which one when you register online, and cannot change your choice after the closing date for registration.’

On page 24, part A II, 2(b):

for:

‘You must give details of your knowledge of languages in the electronic registration form (2) and in the application form. Your choice of languages for taking the tests may not be changed after the deadline for confirming registrations (see section D.1, NB).’,

read:

‘You must give details of your knowledge of languages in the electronic registration form (2) and in the application form.’

On page 29, part D. 1:

for:

‘NBWithin one month following the final date for registration, EPSO will invite you to:
—

confirm your application,

—

confirm your choice of languages,

—

and, where applicable, to choose the city in which you wish to sit the admission test and (if applicable) the written tests.
The invitation and your confirmation will take place via your EPSO profile only.If you do not confirm your application within two months following the final date for registration, EPSO will consider that you have withdrawn your application and it will be terminated.’,

read:

NB

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5103 

To adjust the boundary of the Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park 

to include the Wallis House and Harriston Hill, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. GINGREY of Georgia (for himself and Mr. LEWIS of Georgia) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To adjust the boundary of the Kennesaw Mountain National 

Battlefield Park to include the Wallis House and 

Harriston Hill, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kennesaw Mountain 

5 National Battlefield Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 

6 2012’’. 

7 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

8 The Congress finds the following: 

9 (1) Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield 

10 Park was authorized as a unit of the National Park 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5103 IH

1 System on June 26, 1935. Prior to 1935, parts of 

2 the park had been acquired and protected by Civil 

3 War veterans and the War Department. 

4 (2) Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield 

5 Park protects Kennesaw Mountain and Kolb’s 

6 Farm, which are battle sites along the route of Gen7 eral Sherman’s 1864 campaign to take Atlanta. 

8 (3) Most of the park protects Confederate posi9 tions and strategy. The Wallis House is one of the 

10 few original structures remaining from the Battle of 

11 Kennesaw Mountain associated with Union positions 

12 and strategy. 

13 (4) The Wallis House is strategically located 

14 next to a Union signal station at Harriston Hill. 

15 SEC. 3. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT; LAND ACQUISITION; AD16 MINISTRATION. 

17 (a) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—The boundary of the 

18 Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park is modified 

19 to include the approximately 8 acres identified as ‘‘Wallis 

20 House and Harriston Hill’’, and generally depicted on the 

21 map titled ‘‘Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield 

22 Park, Proposed Boundary Adjustment’’, numbered 325/ 

23 80,020, and dated February 2010. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5103 IH

1 (b) MAP.—The map referred to in subsection (a) 

2 shall be on file and available for inspection in the appro3 priate offices of the National Park Service. 

4 (c) LAND ACQUISITION.—The Secretary of the Inte5 rior is authorized to acquire, from willing owners only, 

6 land or interests in land described in subsection (a) by 

7 donation or exchange. 

8 (d) ADMINISTRATION OF ACQUIRED LANDS.—The 

9 Secretary of the Interior shall administer land and inter10 ests in land acquired under this section as part of the Ken11 nesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park in accordance 

12 with applicable laws and regulations. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to honor the parties request for a decision on the briefs without oral

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(A)(2). The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

DEC 7 2000

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 99-4247

MANUEL VILLAREAL-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

(D.C. No. 99-CR-215)

(D. Utah)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before BALDOCK, HENRY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.**

 

Defendant Manuel Villareal-Garcia pled guilty to illegal re-entry of a deported

alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The district court sentenced Defendant to 57

months imprisonment based upon a guideline range of 46-57 months. On appeal,

Defendant claims his sentence is excessive. Defense counsel has filed an Anders Brief,

suggesting the record contains no meritorious issues for appeal. See Anders v. California,
2

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Because we lack jurisdiction to review Defendant’s sentence, we

dismiss the appeal.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1) & (2), a defendant may appeal a sentence which

“was imposed in violation of law,” or “as a result of an incorrect application of the

sentencing guidelines.” See United States v. Brye, 146 F.3d 1207, 1214 (10th Cir. 1998)

(court of appeals is empowered to review a sentence within the applicable guideline range

where defendant demonstrates the district court misunderstood the guidelines or

its authority to act under them). This grant of jurisdiction does not include an “abuse of

discretion” review for sentences legally imposed within the guideline range. See

United States v. Garcia, 919 F.2d 1478, 1480-81 (10th Cir. 1990). In this case, Defendant

does not point to any error of law or misapplication of the sentencing guidelines. 

Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court,

Bobby R. Baldock

Circuit Judge
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5004 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on diphenyl sulfide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on diphenyl 

sulfide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIPHENYL SULFIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.06 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 diphenyl sulfide) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5004 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS